This will be the most important election in
the history of our country. This election
is not only
the most important
of our lives,
It is one of the most
important
in the life of our nation. Together, we
will restore vision, strength, competence, and
we're gonna have a thing called common sense.
A president who leads
and listens,
who is realistic,
practical,
and has common sense.
No nation will question our power. No enemy
will doubt our might. That we strengthen,
not abdicate our global leadership.
An economy the likes of which nobody no
nation had ever seen China. We were beating
them. That America, not China, wins the competition
for the 21st century. Our borders will be
totally secure. Our economy will soar.
We will return law and order to our
streets. After decades in law enforcement,
I know the importance
of safety
and security,
especially at our border.
Last year, Joe and I brought together Democrats
and conservative Republicans
to write the strongest border bill in decades.
We want people
to come into our country, but they have
to come into our country legally.
We
can create an earned pathway to citizenship
and secure our border. I tell you this,
we want our hostages back, and they better
be back before I assume office,
where you will be paying a very big
price. I will always ensure
Israel has the ability
to defend itself. And now Iran is very
close to having a nuclear weapon.
I will never hesitate
to take whatever action is necessary
to defend our forces and our interests against
Iran and Iran backed terrorists. We gave our
military
almost $800,000,000,000.
As commander in chief,
I will ensure
America
always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force
in the world.
America is on the cusp of a new
golden age. I will make sure
that we lead the world
into the future.
Just like our ancestors,
we must now come together. It is now
our turn
to do what generations
before us have done.
We will press forward, and together, we will
win win.
We are charting
a new way
forward.
Forward.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
That was a great start. If you didn't
hear, I actually didn't pair my mute off,
and I made 2 mistakes in that first
sentence, but I'm glad you didn't hear it.
I said the wrong month and the wrong
day. Monday, September 2, 2024. Thank you for
joining me today.
Now a lot of important stuff to talk
about today. I thought that some of these
things we've been following,
in regard to specifically around polio, the manufacturing
of disease
in Gaza. But we're gonna focus on some
really important developments in this story. A great
article put out by n y Plaid and
and some other, you know, Vanessa Bealey had
a really great take on this as well,
really breakdown
how important this really is to a larger
discussion. And one thing that really worries me
that we've seen
I've been talking a while throughout, like, pretty
much around the time of the COVID 19
illusion and as that build in and kind
of overlapped with a lot of different things.
I was worried about how these agendas would
sort of merge together, and that doesn't always
mean it's gonna happen instantaneously. And a lot
of times we sense certain things that we
predict and ultimately doesn't happen for a year
or so, and we kinda forget that that
you know, the point is that these things
are there for a reason, at least in
my opinion. And what I'm saying is that
I was worried about the overlap of the
biowarfare
aspect of all this with foreign policy, with
sort of an a domestic terrorism angle. And
so what I'm seeing is this overlap now,
which does worry me. And it's worrisome
either way about the idea of manufacturing illness
for for vulnerable people anywhere in the world
is is monstrous. It's
terrorism.
But using this location to
I as well as testing things, we've talked
about a lot in this conversation around Gaza
and Israel and that dynamic. But creating this
this illness and and then this overlapping with
these other issues and seeing this tie back
to a WHO overlap, the the idea of
the oral polio vaccine, the strain that is
present. It's very concerning how this is all
building forward, and so I wanna make sure
we talk about that. We're gonna talk about
that early in the show today.
But we're also gonna get into some I
started with that clip for a reason, some
2 party conversation that overlaps with all the
stuff we're getting into. But we're gonna talk
a lot about in the Israel conversation, the
ceasefire, the hostage
discussion in general, but around the 3 that
were recently killed. And I really wanna break
this down. Now the way I framed this
in the show today,
the obvious discussion about the weaponization of illness,
which is undeniable. They've said this openly about
using these things,
but also around the killing of these hostages.
Now the way I framed it is very
important.
Let's be very, very clear about this to
start. Israel has already been caught,
exposed for by their own media, by their
own people for killing their own hostages,
their own civilians
around that conversation in the kibbutz areas or
or just in general, their own military personnel,
the Hannibal directive. That's not up for debate.
We're not even gonna get into that today.
We've talked about that. As far as I'm
concerned, that is nailed to the wall. The
evidence is undeniable
from their own media, their own tank drivers,
their own helicopter pilots, their own IDF members.
It's undeniable.
Then we can sow many different examples of
hostages within this dynamic.
The 3 that BBC and plenty of others
covered that were shot while escaping and trying
to
telling them, look. We're Israelis. Don't shoot us.
And they killed all 3 of them, one
of them 15 minutes after the other 2.
I'll point that out when we get there.
Or examples of IDF,
hostages or rather most of them are detainees,
by the way. The word, hostages in the
title, are much easier to use to make
sure nobody's confused. But let's be clear, the
vast majority of the people that were taken
were
detainees, POWs. They were military personnel or other
overlapping entities within that concept,
like, official settler aspects or police. These are
all considered military targets in the context of
the way Israel's conducting itself.
Not civilians is the point.
But people that were in Gaza
and then came back and admitted, Noah Arghamani
who just made a big point about this
yet again, even because they were lying about
her,
They were more afraid of IDF bombs than
Hamas
explicitly stated more than once. So all that's
to say that it's not even up for
debate that they have been killing their own
hostages. Now the recent ones that were killed,
there's interesting developments of information that suggest one
of 3 things in my mind. I mean,
I guess, techno the point is that there
are statements going around that I can't seem
to verify that suggest that there's a source
coming from Palestinian
resistance that's that are claiming that they
put out a mandate that essentially that they
would shoot these people if they were coming
and it was essentially a public basically, that
Israel was aware that they were gonna be
executed should they go into this location. Now
I'm not I can't I can't verify that,
but I'm putting it out there because that's
something that's circling. My opinion is much more
centered around the idea.
As I'm sure you can tell, regardless of
this, that it seems very clear that Israel
did this kind of knowing that this would
happen or did this intentionally. This is my
opinion. I'm gonna give you all the facts
for you to come to your conclusions about.
The reason I started with what I just
said before that is because that shouldn't even
be something you balk at. It's happened already.
It's been admitted to.
So my point is that the the the
possible situation here, the many the options we're
looking at in my opinion, which is probably
gonna shock some people, but I think it's
easy to prove. Either this was done with,
the met the bodies of these people that
were collected by Israel throughout this process that
were simply used in this moment, and that's
gonna shock people, but this is something that
they are very capable of and have done
before
just since October 7th. But also, or rather,
the alternative would be that this was something
that was done in the process of their
bombing indiscriminately,
which literally everybody has covered. Israeli media, the
the Israelis themselves, highlighting that they're killing hostages
by indiscriminately bombing where they may be.
Rafa, for example, is where they're claiming they
were found, which I still don't even buy
at all. I don't take anything they claim
at face value.
But then the other possibility could be that
they were going in this location, were aware
that they were gonna be killed, or at
least that it was likely, and did not
do anything to try to stop that from
happening. I actually think that's the least likely
in these pa in in these discussions.
But the reality is,
all of that put aside, the Israeli conversation,
the media and the general majority of the
population,
not because they care about Palestinians by and
large, but the majority of the population are
clear in the fact that they're blaming Netanyahu
explicitly for the deaths of these people. They're
openly calling them out. Whether it's because they
did not take the deal, the 14 different
times they had the option, which is what
they're openly saying, or the fact that their
bombings themselves killed them and they're simply lying
about it. These are being publicly expressed in
Israel.
So before we peep people watching this ex
essentially
hear what we're saying and act like it's
somehow outrageous to put these out there, realize
that it's being, openly discussed in Israeli media
and circles around this of people that have
family members involved in this conversation. So I
thought it was important that we go through
this in-depth
in in the sense of that one discussion
point, but I'm gonna include the rest of
the conversations we've had about how many times
they've disregarded ceasefire deals, lied about it, killed
their own hostages, so you can paint a
picture for yourself with the facts.
And if you disagree with my conclusions on
it, please. I I want that as long
as we're engaging with the facts at hand
and not the different hyperbolic and, you know,
unverifiable
narratives coming out of Israel, the United States
government or Hamas for that matter. Something we
can prove. Now we're gonna get into a
few other things. If we have time, we'll
leave it there to start. So I wanna
start off today
with a conversation about
the 2 party paradigm since I started with
that clip in general. And I really think
it's important for us to to consider
how much of this is being used. And
you're gonna see a very clear overlap in
this with foreign policy in Israel which is
why I'm sort of starting with this. We
did recently, which I'll include right here
Oh actually that's the wrong one. This Shoot,
where was it? Here.
Just recently on our last show on the
31st talked about this almost exclusively
around as well as the digital ID overlap
and kind of the technocracy around it all.
Bipartisan digital ID, because that's one of the
main points there and I'm gonna make that
again today.
Partisan managers which I can't believe I actually
misspelled when I first put this out, really
just a, you know, rushed typo and I
didn't pick it up, missed an a in
there.
Partisan managers circle wagons as the 2 party
illusion begins to break down.
This is what I
very strongly feel is happening.
That there are a lot of us out
there who have been consistent with this opinion
for a very long time. Like James Corbett
for example, who's been talking about the 2
party illusion and the your votes don't transit
for a very long time. It's very strange
that all of a sudden this has become
such a threat. I only I think it's
because of what we keep talking about, and
I'll make this point as we go through
again.
That we are reaching people more than ever,
not just we as in TLAB or we
as independent media. Just people that are making
these arguments
or any number of arguments that really do
cut at the the core, the base of
the problem,
in my opinion anyway, and it's being heard.
People are going, well, this does make sense.
I mean, look at all these problems. And
what they keep saying, going through the same
motions because there's somebody new, we're told. It
just doesn't seem look look at look back.
If anybody has the wherewithal to look back
through literally any of the previous elections, you'll
see all the same hallmarks. That's why I
started with that same clip, they're saying the
same oh, and by the way, I'll show
it as we get through here today. That
was Jill Stein's clip and I did put
my TLav logo over the corner just because
I ever I wanna play in the future.
I don't wanna constantly be promoting
her her campaign. I'm not I don't promote
any poll politicians but I do wanna make
sure I give her credit for the clip
that she put together. Simply highlighting that
look at the 2 people supposedly,
the antithesis of each other saying the exact
same thing.
So the point that we need to make
sure, at least we're considering, is that there's
a reason this is becoming so
problematic for the status quo because people are
waking up to these larger problems. And that's
always gonna feel more problematic. Right now, the
the heat, the volume is being turned up
because people are seeing things or asking questions
they usually haven't, whether it's around Israel, COVID
19, medical freedom, vaccines, whatever.
As much as they try to repackage and
frame and move these things around, it definitely
is a problem for the establishment.
And so that's why I think, in my
opinion, we are seeing things
turned up. And it does make the average
person feel like things are worse than ever.
And in a sense, they are because they're
making that the case. But their only reason
I think it's being driven that way is
because they want you to fall back into
line.
So consider for yourself. But really recognize that
if we keep doing the same thing, we're
not gonna get anything different.
Simple as that.
Now this was something just put out and
it just kinda makes this point. This accentuates
the same old hyperbolic nonsense we get every
time. Now just to be clear for those
that may not be, you know, maybe new
to my show, or what I'm my opinion
in general, I think Kamala Harris is a
monster, a maniac,
an authoritarian capitalist. And they're all gonna try
to control your life for the interest of
the US government. And the larger agenda is
likely more important to them than your country.
And I say that in the sense of,
you know, my country, our country because I
don't think they truly care about any of
this. And that could be because of maybe
Zionist influence, it could be because of a
globalist influence which I think is the same
thing, or it could be because they're just
opportunists that don't really care about you which
is really what we're talking about. You know,
we just played George Carlin's flip yesterday, that's
what the reality is guys. And it's funny
when you hear it in that context, but
it's also pretty depressing when you realize that
it's funny only because we all know it's
true. It's the basic reality.
And so my point in all of this
is that Trump is just the same in
my opinion. They're all Now look, as I've
said before, whoever side, whether you think Kamala's
gonna save the day or whatever, which I
don't even actually know anybody that thinks that
way, which is interesting. And I I know
a lot of democrats out there, just as
many republicans, that
I just think it's interesting that I hear
a lot about the Trump discussion,
but I don't hear much about people thinking,
like, Kamala, it's gonna save us all. So
I actually think the design is to drive
you in the direction of Trump. That's my
personal opinion.
But that I see them both as
rep different flavors of the same problem.
And maybe they don't even know that. But
when I see stuff like this,
Donald Trump put this out on Twitter yesterday.
No one is safe. Which by the way,
doesn't that draw to certain things? Like,
no one is safe until everybody's
safe?
No one is safe until x, y, and
z. You're either with us or you're against
us. Those kind of things. Right? Why? Because
that's just what we always see. Because it
works to the the lowest common denominator, the
people that are trying to scare into position.
But it says, no one is safe with
Kamala's open border.
What does that even mean? Kamala's open border?
Well, didn't we go through this with the
whole Texas conversation where they kept going, oh
my god. The doors. Look. Look. It's bro
everything's coming. And then Republicans went, like, 3
miles down the road and were, like, there's
not even a fence right here. There's this
gate is wide open. Why is nobody talking
about that? Because we're all being played. That's
why. Because it's easy to see that these
things are being used to get people that
are either already aware that it doesn't matter
and they're doing it to trick the people
below them, go along with it, or the
people that are not paying attention enough to
lean into something like this because it's about
control of the way you see things.
Then you may well think it's because of
voting. Again, don't think your vote translates to
the outcome if you believe it makes a
difference. I support your choice as long as
you're voting for what you actually want.
The lesser of evils is not voting for
what you actually want.
If you see another option, then try that.
The idea that you pretend that that doesn't
mean anything is then you're just falling into
line.
Frankly, I think we should be considering a
lot of other things. And I'll I went
into that a lot in the last show
yesterday, so or day before yesterday if you
wanna hear more on that. But the idea
here is that the border conversation is all
the same from both sides and I'll show
you next. They're both pushing the biometric control
structure. Right now, they're both saying that. Now
both parties act like they're the party that's
gonna push the right thing and the other
sides, you know, like, right now the democrat
conversation if I hear in in in the,
you know, the point is the team sport
politics part of it. My show, if you
guys have been following along, you know what
I'm talking about. The democrat, republicans that really
don't care about anything other than their team
winning. I don't see it as the same
as conservatives and liberals at large.
The point is that they're probably pointing over
and my point is I've seen some of
this conversation saying, well, Trump, he wants the
medieval wall and he wants to keep out
all the immigrants. Well, yeah. There was a
time when that was the point, but not
anymore. He's openly saying biometric control structure
And so is she. So what's this about?
And so is right now, is this Kamala's
border? Well, no. It's technically Biden's administration, but
I know the game is to play that
she's always been in control. And frankly, that
wouldn't surprise me at all. Frankly, I think
there are people control above both of these
people, Trump or Kamala. But
it's no different than it was that much
more I mean, at the end of the
day, it's pretty much the same situation it's
been. But now no one is safe in
with Kamala's open border because the argument they're
making is she's gonna just open the border.
Well, no. The argument they're making is a
bunch of floated extreme comments that I don't
even know how they can back up. Frankly,
I don't even believe it. The idea that
they're gonna say like, even in California, they're
just gonna buy all their houses or they're
gonna like, even let's even do it in
reverse. The idea that Trump is gonna deport
all of them. Like, both sides of this
argument are almost irrationally impossible.
I shouldn't say that. Impossible.
But the idea of what it would take
and the type of effort. And, I mean,
how about the idea that even if they
really wanted to, there's still a political dynamic
and the other side's gonna push back and
it's gonna take years for it to be
by the way, that's pretty much by design.
In my opinion, anyway. So all I'm pointing
out is that when they put these kind
of ridiculous statements, and this is a Trump
campaign ad,
it's all about going all or nothing.
Absolutes.
She's gonna kill you. I'm gonna save you.
Right? She's the enemy. I'm your friend. It's
it's always the all extreme everything government because
guess what? You have to pick 1.
But you don't, though. How about we recognize
they're all ridiculous and do something different? But
see, that's apparently black pill today to ask
for anything other than the 2 control choices
that have always given you what you're always
gonna get.
It kills me. And I simply said, we
truly do live in a cartoon. Hat tip
to slow to Steve. Because he says that
all the time and I agree. Because it's
hyperbolic. Like, if this was outside of the
context, this would be laughable.
It's over the top. And, of course, what
you see in the picture,
I guarantee is going is supposed to be
a an immigrant.
An immigrant with a knife about to stab
a woman in an alleyway because that's just
what they all do. Right? I mean, do
you not realize how absurd it is to
continue to frame this all as it's all
the e the evil this is a pull
right out of the whole Jim Crow black
man raping your wives.
Was there was there some aspect in any
context there is? But quite frankly, if you
want my opinion, I would argue that your
wife or whoever's walking down that alleyway is
far more in danger from a thousand other
things that are constant in our lives than
the random person who might have been forced
out of their home from Venezuela because of
US foreign policy or whatever else. But
I could go off on that forever. I
just think it's kind of a sign of
how childishly simplistic this has become.
And I don't think that's everybody.
But I think people are being driven to
take sides because they don't know what else
to do.
Now, of course, the idea we've talked about
a lot to take that further is the
idea of weaponized migration and the idea of
how obvious that is. And I just played
the clip just the other day of the
this was just these are rabbis in Israel
saying, how else are we gonna get the
end times? We have to drive the immigration
into Europe and destroy these areas. No. That
doesn't mean that's what they're doing from an
Israeli government perspective, but what it very clearly
shows you is people like Smotrich and Ben
Gavir in Israel
I shouldn't say that shows you but the
case is, they've openly said this. They openly
endorsed these ideas and openly said that this
is what they want, a multi front regional
war, destabilization. And here they want to drive
the end times, but nobody listens to them.
I would rather the media doesn't point to
it. They openly say it in podiums and
in front of media, but yet the western
press does never highlight the Greater Israel Project,
what they openly tell you they want, the
destabilization of the West Bank in order to
continue to illegally steal the land, the building
of territory, or settlements inside of Gaza, which
is already sort of beginning.
They just don't want you to see it.
Now all that's to say, the point is
weaponized migration is their mindset of driving what
they ultimately want to achieve on a global
scale.
Even if it's irrational or not possible, The
idea is they clearly
expressed that they wanted.
All that's to say that we should at
least consider whether some of this might be
because of what they're trying to accomplish. Maybe
if simply enough because they just don't want
you to recognize their genocide or because they're
desperate.
But realize there's open discussion from Israel's side
about how they drive these kind of convert
these actions. And there's articles written from think
tanks about how Israel's already done this in
the past. And how on top of that,
one was written, I think it was the
end of 2023 about how they're doing it
already with people in Gaza.
So we remember that in Venezuela, Israel was
on in communication with the one of the,
well, I forget her name off the top
of my head. The one of the not
Gonzales, but the woman that was working with
him in regard to that election.
She reached out to Netanyahu
personally in 2018 and said, regime change this
government. I showed you the document right on
the show, it's a public discussion.
So we should at least ask whether there's
something else happening here that's driving this conversation.
The reason I mention Venezuela is because we're
gonna get to that point in a second.
But remember, Venezuela is one of the largest
reasons for the caravan and the whole it's
it's all
it with direct connected, obviously. But there's another
word that we can't think of, you know.
They they drive each other, is the word
I'm looking for and I can't think of
it. But here's that clip I played. So
if you wanna watch it again, it's right
here.
Now on top of that, remember there you
and this one this one I mean. How
did all one thing leads to another.
The the the immigration conversation that they're creating
with their policy working in and as well
as foreign entities
is being used to push on you the
digital ID.
The save act.
Real ID and ID 2020. Remember, we just
went over this in the last show. The
the real ID compliant identification is what they're
pushing on the side of the mobile driver's
licenses. And they're telling you it's gonna eventually
be for all of your identification,
birth certificates, everything. So what that effectively does
is you got the SAVE Act which includes
at least the majority of the choices under
this real ID compliant, digital ID, and a
couple of other choices. But those couple of
other choices become removed when the mobile driver's
license or store of your identification
happened under Biden.
So as usual, the left and the right
work together, and boom, you get digital IDs.
They point at each other. It's a Trojan
horse.
Reub Republicans are falling for it.
Now the biometric wall is one of the
aspects of how this all works. So not
only digital ID, but it's getting you to
call for that without knowing it, as well
as getting you to call for
biometric control structures. And by the way, both
of those are sustainable development goals.
The digital digital identification, the biometric tracking system,
these are all part of exactly what they
pretend they're fighting. As long as they don't
point to it, you're I guess we can't
piece that together. Right?
Trump on the biometric tracking system, and the
other clips I won't play right now when
he says the it's a very good vaccine,
and how he also end up by the
way, he says it saves lives and how
nobody gets hurt when they take it. This
was a not this was not long. This
was Candace Owens not that long ago. He
also talks about how Israel should rightfully have
control over US congress. He said that in
3 different interviews now. And it said and
that and my point was this this video
or this rather this tweet was you might
not be surprised to know that Kamala Harris
shares all of these stances.
That's the point. It's not an attack on
Trump. It's to show you that people that
are thinking he's the savior versus the bad
guy is that they're both the same thing.
Different flavors. They're both bringing forward the same
ideas.
Now I wanted to show you this.
So, so SOS USA says nothing new. This
is from 1956.
It's a quote from 1956.
I believe that democracy and this is from,
w e b,
oh, how would you say that? I've seen
that before. Duboe, maybe? D u, space, b
o I s.
1956.
I believe that democracy has so far disappeared
in the United States that no
2 evils
exist.
There is but one evil party with 2
names, and it will be elected despite all
I can do or say. Funny how far
back the 2 evils game goes. You know
why? Because this is the same old thing.
Different people, different focal points, shifting wedge issues,
same control structure.
I just think it was important that we
consider that because we're seeing the same. That's
why I started with that clip. We're seeing
the same thing.
Now let's play this biometric control structure, the
the biometric clip real quick. Then I'll read
to you what, or and I'll play for
you a couple other clips that I think
are important to build off of.
Alright.
We will finally complete
the biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
And remember what what Derek broke down in
his recent article, which you'll it'll be beneath
on one of these, links we have.
That in that conversation, they make it clear
that the,
the border patrol
has already made it clear that from 2,074
in our Trump's administration, which is where this
really this push began,
that they were gonna be taking the face
of everyone leaving and coming through the airports.
Right? So this is not just about immigrants,
guys, and these things were all getting face
the the the biometrics, they're getting the facial
ID scans. That's what this all comes down
to. And so this is part of a
larger agenda no matter how you spin it,
even if you don't think that. So you
it was protect look. We can't factor in
that this could be built and then the
next person gets in power and uses it
for the wrong thing. That's how this always
works, and they want you to lean into
that idea that somehow they'll make sure it's
protect no. Even if you think that, it's
so eventually gonna end up in the wrong
hands. But the reality is they're all the
wrong hands.
For years, congress has required
biometric
entry exit visa tracking systems,
but it has never been completed. The politicians
are all talk, no action, never happens,
never happens.
Hillary Clinton,
all talk. Unfortunately,
when there is act Do you see how
easy that is? Do you see how easy
that is to just go, oh, yeah. Hillary
didn't do it.
And all of a sudden their minds are
going, yeah. Trump's gonna do what Hillary couldn't
do. You do it. Give us the biometric
control structure because that's what Hillary didn't want
us to have.
Like, I it's almost it's almost it's almost
become too simplified. Like, I don't know how
we took this many steps backward, but it
seems like people and you know what? Maybe
I hope I'm wrong. Hopefully, that nobody's falling
for this and I and we've already you
know, that they're desperate and no one's falling
for it. But frankly, I see too many
at the very least of people out there
that, you know, have good intentions that still
fall for this stuff. Like, it's it's become
like if they say he didn't do it
then he therefore, he did. Or if they're
telling you not to look, we're supposed to
look. It's not that simple, and I think
that they can think past that kind of
a basic manipulation. Right? So at least consider
that it's you're being played with something as
simple as that. Either way, whether or not
he knows that, the point is we do
not or should not want a biometric tracking
system. You'd think that would've like, imagine if
Biden had brought this up during COVID 19,
the illusion they're in. What do you think
the Republicans would've said? It's the same thing,
by the way. It doesn't just change because
Trump's holding it. At least, I mean, the
same way when they were talking about the
injection during the during the illusion.
Where who well, you Trump's gonna put a
vaccine for you. Who's gonna take it? You're
gonna take it? Remember all that? And then
it shifted and they just were like, now
it's good. And or or vice versa where,
Alex Jones told everybody it was Trump's sugar
water, so it's good. But then Demst took
hold, well, now it's bad. It's like these
are childishly obvious manipulations. I mean, David,
Knight and I talked about in our interview
about how that's one of the reasons why
he pulled away from that platform because it's
just that's just simply disarming. People died because
of these things. They still do because he
tells you it's okay, right to this very
day.
It's always the wrong decision. Do you ever
notice?
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land. Yep. It will be on sea.
Yep. It will be in air. We will
Okay. So explain for me how that makes
sense if it's about the immigration.
Right? Are are are they flying in jets?
Or how's that working?
All he really did right there was slip
it in so you ultimately cheer for the
fact that you're going to be controlled. Your
biometric control structure, under the guise of immigration,
with your digital ID that'll make it all
work, is all driving forward because Trump told
you it was a good thing. Have a
proper tracking
system. Yeah. Isn't that what we all scream
for?
No.
Interesting how this how easy it is for
some people to be manipulated. Now here are
some others.
This one, this one, this was shared by
Todd with me online, but ultimately, what he
I didn't agree with half of what he
said essentially on it. But the idea is
that this is a clip
that is old. I think it's 8 years
or so, but the bottom line is it
shows you the same kind of conversations.
And the one the one on the right,
we've already shown you about the about the
guns. Now all if you haven't seen this
other clip, the point again is that he's
talking biometric tracking systems. He's talking about the
injections,
goods, saving lives. He's talking about Israel should
have rightly rightly have control over congress.
This clip now talks about how we should
potentially
shut down or control the Internet because of
bad actors,
And Bill Gates can help with that. Funny
how much things shift around. And the other
one is, you know, take the guns, due
process later. I don't know why we can't
at least think about how bad all of
this looks.
But, yeah, of course, look, he might have
changed all of his opinions, but I think
that my point is almost all of these
I can already show you, that's not the
case.
Narrative shift around, but every like, these bottom
two,
you could argue that maybe these things have
shifted up until recently, but the top 3
at the very least are right up until
now. All three of these, right this moment,
he stands by. Now these ones, you can
decide for yourself, but this is least should
give you pause. And I'm not saying Kamal
is any different. They're all the same is
my point. The 2 of the 2 part
of people we're talking about, I still argue
that in general, you know, my opinion about
voting, but I would I can almost I
could guarantee
that most people out there right now, based
on even the conversation online,
would rather pick somebody else like Jill Stein
than one of the other 2. That's not
what I'm doing. I don't think any of
them are any different quite frankly. I've given
those opinions in the previous show. But I'm
my point would be as always, if you
feel it makes a difference,
if you believe in the outcome, then follow
through with it. Just don't think that's the
only thing you need to do. And recognize
that at the end of the day, if
you're quibble if you're balking at both choices
and falling into line because they told you
you'd waste it otherwise,
that is failing yourself.
Do do cares what other people think? Do
what you believe in. All this talk about
how that's somehow not what adults I mean,
this is it's painful to watch people who
are otherwise, at least in my opinion, intelligent
act like fault just
like, the idea that going, what else are
we gonna do? This this one's worse than
the other one. There's no other choice. Adults
would just act it's it kills me Because
it's it's ignorance masquerading as intelligence.
I mean, plain and simple.
The arguments themselves contradict each other. Your vote
always matters. Your vote is accept. Accept. No.
That's not how that works. That's like saying,
you have constitutional rights and freedom of speech.
Accept.
Right? You can have medical freedom. Accept with
the shot. Accept because everyone's in danger. Like,
it's the same game. That's what your government
does. And you're doing it to yourself in
some ways. But here's a clip of Donald
Trump telling you about the Internet. Think about
where this might lead.
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the internet. And we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them maybe in certain areas
closing that Internet up in some way. Somebody
will say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of
speech.
Oh, freedom of speech.
Really? I mean, I don't I don't care
what time that was. I don't care what
has changed. This is a man that you're
voting for.
At any point in time, his opinion was,
oh, there'll be people that'll say freedom of
speech. Guess what he says next about those
people screaming about their freedom of speech.
These are foolish people.
A lot of foolish people. We Foolish people.
Sounds pretty quiet in there when he's talking
about that. A lot of these constitutional freedom
loving gun owners going, woah, what now?
Stupid really foolish people because your guts have
shut the Internet down because, you know, Russian
things or whatever the point was at the
time. That's all it is. It's about concern.
If if I heard her correctly, it's about
the same the bad actor conversation. Right? That
we're people or the idea that people are
being taken, like, by, like, joining ISIS or
whatever. It's crazy
that they would argue in any context. This
is like saying I mean, you could apply
this anywhere. Shutting down your ability to for
free speech because that speech might get you
in trouble. You may be fooled by somebody
online.
He's telling you you're foolish
for thinking that that might be a problem
with free speech.
Areas closing that Internet up in some way.
Somebody will say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom
of speech.
Wow. These are foolish people. We have a
lot of foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. We've gotta maybe do something
with the Internet because they are recruiting by
the 1,000. Yeah.
I mean, okay. Are we really under the
impression that ISIS is recruiting by the 1,000?
Didn't he say he defeated ISIS, like, 45
times and then also just attacked Iran yesterday?
You know how that works?
Not yesterday but your point is the same.
Because it's it's just embarrassing how these things
cycle around and people that don't wanna see
it just don't care to see it. In
other words, just accept their
think there's some kind of an error that
explains it a way. People that don't wanna
see things just simply won't within the team
sport politics.
And that's problematic. But he certainly could've changed
his mind, but the fact that he ever
held a position that people were foolish for
having concerns about free speech when your point
was to shut the Internet down in some
ways. Guys, that's just who he is. Either
he does not understand
or he didn't care.
Either way, that concerns me. And I know
one of the arguments is, well, he's learned
and he's willing to and he's up to
smart. I mean, all these things are just
narratives, excuses.
He's showing you what he is as he
still stands by the shot that's killed a
lot of people right to this moment. Now
here's the one about the guns. Again, I
don't understand how people who are calling themselves
patriots are not worried about this conversation that
he's not far as I know, there's never
been a deviate he's never walked this back
and said I was wrong about that.
The firearms
first and then go to court because that's
another system. Because a lot of times, by
the time you go to court, it takes
so long to go to court
to get the due process
procedures.
To go to court would have taken a
long time. So you could do exactly what
you're saying, but take the guns first, go
through due process second.
No. It it be cut for time. Point.
The point is he ultimately says that the
person, you know, crazy people or whatever, which
is usually the point. You know, oh, well,
he's talking about crazy people. Like, guys, it
doesn't make a difference. That's why the the
point the the what was said there is
the main idea. It doesn't matter to them,
oh, he's crazy, therefore.
The excuses that we made were people that
wanna pretend like he's got good intentions, but
what happens with the democrats take control?
Simple. Right? And I don't think that the
point is they're all the same to me.
Am I making the point that might reach
somebody that by saying that, then who then
2 seconds later, they decide that because you
wear a red hat, that means that you're
actually crazy. You see how easy that is?
And we all know that's how this works.
In the minds of some republicans, it only
happens when democrats do it. But either way,
the idea of ever framing it as we'll
take the guns first, deal with the process
later because
no. There is nothing that fills that gap.
The idea is you are you it if
if the guy was if if the point
is if you have an issue that is
legally bar like, the idea that you're crazy,
which by the way, there's a fair argument
to make that somebody is schizophrenic, so we
should be discussing whether they can have access
to certain things. It's a def it's a
difficult conversation.
Because at the end of the day, you
end up having to decide with what you
you know, like, for instance, with freedom of
speech, fire in a theater. It's a hard
conversation. You tend to you know where my
stance is. But I'm always open to people
making logical arguments for why it may be
better to have limited speech instead of freedom
of speech because that's what that would be.
Same conversation here. There's a we can have
these conversations.
But to simply go, well,
blanket statement. Shut it down. Right? Take them
and deal with that later. That is what
governments do
every day of your life. And they abuse
those things every day of your life. And
maybe sometimes the person who initiated it had
good intentions,
but it all ultimately doesn't matter and I
don't think they do, quite frankly.
Now on these points,
here are some things I wanna include. Here
is the actual just link to this that
had somebody had on Rumble so you can
watch it about him saying that and he's
talking about the mentally ill guy and you
gotta go to court and all this, and
you know, the point is that clearly we
should not be able to circumvent your due
process. Technically, they're not
able to. Period.
They're inherent rights. They can ignore them.
I I should say that back. Or they're
able to circumvent, they can ignore them. But
the point is, they're always present. It's a
god given inherent right. It's always present whether
they ever wrote those things down on a
piece of paper.
Here
is the Internet aspect of it. Because my
even myself, I saw that. I was like,
I don't remember that exactly.
And I don't I would I like, you
know, deep fakes today. Anything can be faked.
Even even making it look like an older
clip. Right? These things are not hard to
do these days.
So yeah. And it was because ISIS recruits
kids from the Internet. Really? Come on.
So Trump says closing the Internet is a
good way to fight terrorism. That's 2,015.
2,015,
Donald Trump wants Bill Gates to close that
Internet up.
This is crazy to me. And here's 2023.
Somebody this is about the current situation where
he might get reelected. Now this is somebody
that worked with him, former staffer. Now you
could take that for what you want. That
could be somebody trying to, you know, call
him out for things that he didn't do.
Maybe it's a secret democrat. Whatever you wanna
think to ignore it, which is usually how
that works. Whatever I can make up in
my mind to make sense of why that
probably isn't the case. Either way, he said
it, and I think that's concerning. And the
overall point, as I'm sure you probably already
forgot, who wants pretend that I'm attacking Donald
Trump, is that Kamala is exactly the same.
Every single one of them are doing the
same things. And same point that I made
in that last clip. Whether it's about taking
the guns due process later, whether it's about
shutting down the Internet, they are sharing these
stances.
That's pretty much a 2 party illusion, isn't
it?
Now, again,
I recommend you watch this if you wanna
understand our stance on this or talking about
the the con the new alliance conversation or
a lot of different things.
Now American Values posted this. Tulsi Gabbard says,
this election is an opportunity for us to
change elections from being solely republican versus democrat.
How exactly, Gabbard? Why? Because you have people
that are saying they used to be democrats
who are now republicans on the republican administration
running as a republican. That sure and they're
running against democrats. Sure sounds like the same
old dumb thing to me with a bunch
of narratives around it but, you know, the
the idea is that she obviously played a
lot of people just like Bernie Sanders and
the rest of them because if you can
make an entire campaign around the idea that
this person is the worst person who's gonna
get us into wars and then ultimately endorse
them, you have no principles.
I don't care how nice they look or
how good they say things. I cannot stand
behind that. I say the same thing about
RFK at this point. It's ridiculous to me
that you could pretend that that move was
anything other than political.
I I just I don't wanna make I'll
make a point about this right now actually.
And she says, well, yeah, that's the point
ultimately. Her making the claim that this will
change the dynamic. I hope it does. I
don't see how that's possible.
But and this is River r saying, we
need a populist party. RFK Junior could have
been that candidate. Maybe we should start one
now for next time, which is arguably what
I think he should have done. Instead, if
we still have a sovereign country, not, you
know, whatever the party called, meaning
try for that 5%, start a new party,
which what I think he should have done.
And what his people wanted him to do,
at least try. Right? Because who knows what
ultimately would happen? Are we really pretending the
poll show us what we wanna know? Really?
My god. And it says, in the meantime,
to prevent the absolute worst, we need to
vote for the second worst. Fabulous. He's there
he's calling it ridiculous. I agree.
Lesser of evils sure sounds fun to vote
for evil, doesn't it? Now ask yourself if
that was the whole point and we always
could vote our way out of this problem.
It's funny how that's never happened.
Every time we get the same shtick and
every time we go, oh, that's gotta do
it because it's the most important this time.
Silly.
This person says, Bobby, and this is interesting.
RFK Junior is still on the ballot in
40 states. Now I don't know how that
is cur I I don't know what the
current accuracy of that is right now. I
know, but I know the point in the
discussion is that he is going to be
staying on the ballots. I don't I mean,
I don't know how we can say this
if it hasn't technically happened yet. Right?
But either way, I know that even he
and they they floated the idea that he's
gonna stay on some of these ballots.
Now I myself, and even, like, Sam Musani,
I just called this out. Like, that seems
very manipulative and very strange. Right? Now here's
2 things I wanna say about this statement
he's gonna make. 1, it explains
it seems like it might explain,
on from one side of it, why.
On the other side of it, I think
it's interesting that
this can't make sense if you really think
it out.
He's saying they're staying
on 40 states or some of them, again,
I can't back I don't know the accuracy
of the number, to give Americans the opportunity
to get to 5%.
Okay. So at face value, I thought, I'm
like, oh, oh, okay. Well,
at first, I'm like, that kinda makes sense.
But then then you think it out for
a second, and maybe you're thinking about it
too.
How could that possibly make sense?
Because on just on the first claim, well,
yeah, then okay. Maybe they could still get
the 5%. So then you could say, well,
yeah. We're
trying to make the best of a situation,
leaning into Trump's campaign. Maybe we can make
a difference for health during the next 4
years. But also, we can prob maybe still
get 5% and start a new party. Sounds
perfect, doesn't it accept for the fact that
that's never possible? Because Trump's administration
would never
allow somebody on their administration to potentially take
votes away from him.
Because that's ultimately what it would do.
I mean, the whole what's think about how
crazy it is, and it could come from
either side, but the entire argument
from any other dynamic, about even third party,
about what we're saying is, oh, you're only
gonna take a vote away. If you're voting
third party, you're gonna give it to the
other person. Isn't that all we hear? Like,
that's been like this smug not mantra from
the Republicans about everything we've been saying for
the last week. Now suddenly, the idea is
that RFK is gonna do that though, but
it's good because RFK and maybe 5% for
a different party that's not Trump's and that,
yay. I mean, how does that even make
sense from a republican or a conservative supports
a position where you're supporting Trump?
I again, I think I I've seen this
a few times now.
Frankly, I think this is a ploy put
out to get republic
people supporting RFK Junior to think that, oh,
good. He didn't sell us out in order
to eventually make them miss that he ultimately
sold them out.
I don't even know if it's gonna happen.
But if it does, I don't know how
in the world we can pretend that Trump's
administration would have ever allowed that if the
entire mantra was that any other vote is
gonna be simply giving it to Kamala.
So wouldn't that be the same? Yes. It
would. Simple logic here, guys. So I think
it's pretty strange to me how this is
all playing out. And, again, it only continues
to point to what I think is happening.
Because this is an obvious, in my opinion,
drive to make you think Trump was the
one.
Now, on that same point about censorship and
so on, I mean, the whole, you know,
contradicting dynamic,
These other news put this out on the
on the 31st, which is a pretty important
contradiction.
It says well, the point he tweeted on
the 31st, RFK Junior did. Freedom of speech
without freedom of reach is not freedom of
speech. Period.
Well, that's not gonna make Elon Musk too
happy, and he seems to be a central
dynamic of this whole push for Trump and
everything else. I mean, it seems like he's
even gonna have a cabinet position or some
kind of a role.
And the whole point is that free speech
for republicans is all about Twitter right now
and that that's the I mean, so this,
no matter how you look at it, is
it doesn't jive with the rest of what's
going on. And, also, wait. Also, it's true.
Exactly what we've been saying. Well, you're not
fighting for free speech if you're actually fighting
freedom of reach because that's a central part
of freedom of speech. It's it's a precedent
set. Sam Musseini's talked about this. So they
knew that. They lied to you. They tricked
you into thinking that that's all to say.
It's not. Right? You you can say what
you want, but you're in this dark corner
screaming to nobody. Well, that's exactly what was
going on before. Shadow banning. That's what they're
doing. They haven't changed.
Different types of control, very surreptitious, but we're
dealing with this very something almost worse in
my opinion.
But the point of him saying that seems
crazy to me. Right? And then he then
Decentured News says, then why did you praise
x? Which he did right here on
16th. So 2 weeks later. So he says,
the bastion of free speech called x. Okay.
You're beginning to see the point. That's crazy.
That's a that means that he's either completely
shifted his opinion because he didn't know that.
I don't know how it's possible. When 2
weeks ago he was saying, they're saving free
speech over here on the platform you just
explicitly said isn't because they're doing what you
just said doesn't make free speech.
So at the minimum that should be in
a popular post because you're going, woah. Yeah.
He's something's shifting or he's challenging the party
he's now a part of or he's lying
to us. And here's Elon making clear, freedom
of speech but not freedom of reach. And
Jacarino, in her clip we played says the
same thing.
And he go I think that's right here.
The clip he's done right
there. Okay.
So my point is, I sure do wonder
why this massive and important contradiction that is
being highlighted by Censored News, you know, who
regularly gets very solid engagement for these exact
type of posts.
I wonder why it's getting so low engagement.
Can anyone think of any reason why that
might be the case? I'm totally baffled, guys.
Sure you get my point.
But here's what's interesting.
Johnny
goes, hey. Kennedy is fully aware. Now this
but this is on the same day, mind
you. So I don't know why this was
happening on 31st. But Bitshoot comes over and
says, we at Bitshoot respect the courage of
Elon Musk, which I almost kinda feel like
this might have been sarcastic. I don't know.
And I I I
I like BitChute. And I think what they're
doing is is genuine, like even our cases
down here, which I agree with. I think
they're doing real free speech dynamic over here.
And also I like what they're working on,
I'm I'm in the back end kind of
working with the, one of the early adopters
of their kind of,
Patreon style for Bitshoot, and I'm hoping to
work with Bitshoot more in general. I like
what they're doing. The point is that I
that statement I don't agree with. I don't
think Elon's doing that at all. But here's
what RFK says.
Unlike
Twitter and Rumble,
BitChute does not impair or interfere with reach.
Guys, that's crazy. That's he's talking about Twitter
and Rumble.
And he's saying so in case you're missing
the alternative, he's saying Twitter and Rumble
impair
or interfere
with your reach.
Am I am I the only one that
finds that to be kind of
jarringly
out of
I don't know. That's that's very interesting to
me. And he says, does 0 shadow banning
so BitChute, as as opposed to X and
Rumble, Twitter and Rumble, which do,
actually backs up that claim by offering a
10,000 k reward for anyone demonstrating they've been
shadowbanned.
No one can pay for amplifying engagement.
All of these things mean Rumble and Twitter
are doing them. All natural, all organic, unfiltered,
unfettered.
I
it's crazy.
So I think it's very interesting that on
the platform he's calling out, this tweet is
getting basically zero engagement for what he usually
gets for these kind of tweets.
I don't need to say I mean, the
point is obvious. Twitter is censoring. It's obviously
very personal and subjective and categor
cat,
categorical.
They're choosing based on certain things. And I
think that's blatantly obvious. And if you think
Elon Musk is not personally involved,
you're lying to yourself. I think these people
are all very petty, very insecure
people. Typically, people in these positions tend to
be in their own ways. Either way,
not getting a lot of reach. Oh, in
case you forgot, by the way, here's APAC
tracker exposing that also got you know, should've
gotten a lot more reach. That TLab, out
of literally anybody else that was shown, had
60 different,
tags,
flags that were put on my Twitter account,
all of them suppressing my reach on this
platform. Until they removed the way to see
this and now you can no longer check.
It was all circulating for a while, but
of course, all the republicans screaming how he's
saving free speech just happened to miss it,
you know? Must have been the one of
those days.
Now,
talking about foreign policy.
I think this is interesting before we get
into the larger Israel conversation.
Decentral News points out, yesterday, as people of
Turkey prepared for a today's national election and
again, this was posted on the,
September 2, 2024. And this is this is
from an older May 14, 2023
saying Twitter was busy with a project of
their own, selectively censoring content on in the
new country at the behest of the Turkish
government.
Interesting. Right? Now here is what tray Michael
Tracy said 7 hours ago.
And because this is
easy to show. I mean, it's it's and,
there's a I'll make a few points coming
up next. He says, can anyone explain why
Elon Musk
has dutifully complied
with censorship orders? Because he has, and it's
in their own lawsuit, they made this clear.
From countries like India,
Turkey,
but has bombastically
defied comparable comparable
orders from Brazil?
It's a good question.
I mean, the simple obvious point is that
it's not consistent. So you only seem to
care about it in one location and the
rest you comply with. So that means you
don't care about censorship. That means you don't
care about free speech. You care about the
presentation of it in a very specific way
or working with certain interests. I mean, that
should be self evident based on the fact
that they're still literally censoring on this platform.
But
I think that's an important point
and realizing that it's already been done.
Now, on top of that, this Turkey has
formally asked to join BRICS, such as wanna
include that, which I find very interesting. I
I've made this point many times over the
years, like, why
NATO or, Turkey has a very
part of NATO. Right? So Turkey seems to
be able to all Erdogan in particular seems
to be able to do kind of anything
he wants all the time, and nobody ever
makes this case about how he's not part
of NATO. Against Israel, but this, this. I
don't know how this is gonna ever make
sense in that context. Maybe this will be
the move that but I it's interesting, nonetheless.
I don't know why he's given side of
this carte blanche. Maybe they'll change. But to
join this is a very it's a huge
challenge to the kind of, you know, US
preeminence in this conversation. We'll see how this
plays out. But either way, I think it's
important to think about the censorship around this
platform and how it seems to be selectively
applied. Now I made this point just in
the last show briefly.
So as they're screaming about Brazil and as
they're screaming and by the way, every act
of censorship we should care about. I'm not
saying we shouldn't care more or less we
shouldn't care more about some and less about
others. That's what Elon's doing, apparently.
The point is we should care about all
of them. But I think what's interesting is
as they point to Brazil,
and he frames himself as this counterbalance to
what's happening, I don't think that's the case
at all. I mean, you I'm not I'm
sorry to be getting into why. There's a
lot of arguments flying around about why Brazil
is happening. Some people argue that Elon's essentially
in the case making it happen. But either
way, it could just be that that government
doesn't like what he's saying on Twitter. That's
blatant censorship. The point is he's using that
to make it seem as if he's the
one saving free speech when you can prove
it's not even remotely the case. Both of
those things can exist. It's the way it's
again, it's like we said earlier. If it's
not this, then it's that. It's this very
simple binary thinking they've tricked everyone into doing
all the time. But My point is that
as you're over here pointing at certain things
now I'm going to make a deeper point
about the Telegram discussion. I wanna make sure
I had more time to go into this.
Nawal,
Majeed, I believe he did a great breakdown
of this.
About that kind of honey track that it
really is, but at the same time, it
is censorship at the same point. But I
wanna make sure we've written more time on
that. The point is that it's the same
kind of manipulative aspect. Ties to Israel, ties
to the reality of this being used for
control of information, manipulating people, but then they're
also trying to censor him. And the point
is that they're giving you half of that
story from Elon, the rest of this half
narrative people. But over here, we've got a
whole bunch of examples of Israel blatantly taking
action against Americans.
Also on Twitter, by the way. So ask
the free speech savior why he's allowing ADL
and APAC and everyone else to influence the
conversation on a platform that's pretend pretends to
be free speech. Or if you care about
other people being centered around the world by
other governments,
why don't you care about this Australian journalist
that got,
essentially,
under the
Australia's Radical Discrimination Act, fat facing facing
charges
because of what they say about Israel?
Isn't that the exact same thing you're making
about people in the UK or France making
claims and and and statements about the immigrants?
And then being arrested for it, and you
guys I mean, and it's I that also
is censorship, and it shouldn't be allowed. But
it's funny how it's only selectively framed. Now
that you don't have to care about everything
all over the place. But when you can
see it this prevalent,
this clear in the conversation, the only things
you highlight are the ones that seem to
be selectively focused on a a conversation that
you're using to funnel people into your narrative
and ignoring anything that challenges
I mean, all over the world, Israel is
taking actions like this, and you're and you're
not seeing any conversation about it. Things that
directly overlap on Twitter, like the CHEQ bots
they've used over on the platform, or still
to this day using Authentix to verify identities
on Twitter.
Again, it's amazing to me that nobody, not
Republicans, Democrats, or anybody seems to care about
that point. He lied to us. They're still
using Authentics and stealing your biometric data to
confirm he who you are on Twitter right
now.
He said Stripe was gonna be the case
and everyone just let it go. Guess not.
I can't I showed censored man, by the
way, the one that was really breaking that
down, and I had yet to see a
point about it. It's easy to prove. But,
see, that's how it happens when you're
freedom of speech, but not reach. It's how
that works.
But this one is for Mary,
Costa cost,
costacitus.
She's being facing charge in Australia for calling
this out, calling Israel out for what they're
doing. Professor Danny Shaw,
FBI DHS, so we're talking about the United
States, detained and interrogated this person in Chicago
because he came from a free Palestine festival.
No one cares about that though. Right?
You get my point.
Richard Bedhurst.
Getting arrested, getting a
electronic seized, and how and who goo knows
how long they hold them. And by the
way, I just recently saw a story of
somebody getting arrested like this for being a
journalist and then finding a device in their
phone that they were using to spy on
them. Because that's what they do today. We're
literally living under the most authoritarian control structure.
I mean, I think we're just beginning to
see these people for what they really are.
And, of course, what I was gonna point
out yesterday, and I real I'm gonna do
it for a moment. I wanna play this
clip for you. Or really just I think
this was, I'll just
read it.
Sarah will, Sarah,
Wilkinson.
She put this post out on the 30th.
We hold the UK government fully responsible for
its intimidation and oppression of pro Palestinian journalists
and demand that it stops terrorizing our reporters.
Now as I understand it, she's out, but
she was taken.
Seized through electronic, the same thing, just because
she is advocating for Palestine.
It's everywhere.
Now the gray zone also put this out
on the 29th. Funny how this doesn't get
attention. Leaked chats obtained by the gray zone
reveal massive corruption by Ecuador's top prosecutor.
Okay.
Who coordinated with the United States government to
undermine investigations
into the current and last president and help
Washington restore control?
So it's funny how the screening about who
should be in control in Venezuela
there because Elon just cares about democracy. Right?
But weird how the Biden administration is openly
manipulating the outcomes of this country, but no
one wants to talk about it. Wonder why.
Because it's only about the interest of the
empire,
which Elon is a part.
You know, the oligarch military contractor who literally
is currently working for the Biden administration as
a military contractor because that's the administration in
control of all these kind yep.
But don't be who cares because he's working
for Trump now, apparently. That's how easy we
are to get played, it seems.
Now this
is an important overlap to Venezuela.
Lord Biel put this out. That's one of
the reasons the global south is distancing itself
from the United States. Why? Because the US
can just seize your stuff if it's in
the mood.
Exactly. They're literally just seizing Maduro's plane because
they I guess they're mad they didn't get
their way.
Because apparently, his plane, in some way, violated
their sanctions.
That's completely
that that is totalitarian.
The United States government first has no legal
authority to just hand down independent sanctions unilaterally.
They do it. Now they all seem to
do it because the US really kinda started
that boat,
but that's supposed to go through an international
body.
I made this point forever. And it doesn't
seem to get the point is there these
are unilateral sanctions from a state. Why one
country is allowed to go, you're sanctioned? Why?
I can tell you because they have control
over the dollar, which is the that's the
whole BRICS dynamic, which is what they're desperately
trying to push back on and all Republicans
call communism and certainly maybe an overlap of
some of these things. But at the end
of the day, it's a normal reaction, I
would argue,
to the overwhelming control of one country over
everybody's influence. Now I'm not saying it's I
mean, I'd almost guarantee
it is probably gonna anger some that wanna
see this as the positive rise, and I
hope it is. Like, I hope Trump will
change the world. I see it as becoming
the same thing in the future. It's just
my point is any power structure with enough
power will can ultimately end up in the
same position. And that's why it's on us
as people to stop the problem of government
in general coalescing power at the top. That's
where, again, as I said the other day,
we're seem seemingly not ready for the conversation
that government is the problem.
But here we are with them just taking
Maduro's plane
because he's in power now because he got
elected by the people, which all the 800
different international observers all testified to, including members
of the opposition except the ones that were
completely working for the CIA and US government
in Israel. I'm not saying that hyperbolically.
And the point about this is twofold. I
said in addition to being one of the
most powerful,
the US government and its partners in crime
is simply the most underhanded and malicious gang
amongst the many gangs of the world that
we call governments. I genuinely believe that, by
the way. And I also include the link
to James Corbett and I there are
watch along with his 3 part documentary on
Al Qaeda and how the US government created
Al Qaeda, ISIS, the rest of it.
Easy to prove, but it's still shocking for
some people apparently.
Now Casey makes a good point.
Here's what Elon Musk said.
Tagging the same tweet, by the way, about
the seizing of the plane.
It says, unless
the Brazilian government
returns,
excuse me, the illegally seized property of x
and SpaceX,
we will seek which by the way, the
idea that this government is seizing like, this
whole thing to me is all these governments
are completely
There's a reason these governments are allowed to
be in these positions just like the US
government. Like, the way like, the fact with
Colombia, for example, where they allow them to
be the leading exporter of cocaine in the
world and no one calls them narcodrome. But
then over here, Venezuela is a narcoterrorist
capital.
Not even remotely as much, but it's because
they're an ally with Colombia. Right? It's the
same point. Like, why
my point in general is these governments are
gangsters,
whether it's Brazil or either the rest of
them. So the point about this and him
taking from the I think it's all these
games they're playing in power. But at the
end of the day, of course, what they're
doing is wrong, same with the censorship. But
he says, unless the Brazilian government returns the
illegally seized property of x and SpaceX,
we
will seek reciprocal seizure of government assets too.
Okay. Wait. We as in who, Elon? Are
we talking about
you as in Twitter? You in SpaceX?
Or you in the government?
Like, I think there's only one way to
take this. I don't think there's any other
dynamic in which Elon Musk, and whatever else
he's a part of, can seize government assets
unless you're the US government,
or some power structure.
Right?
So here's Elon Musk speaking
for the deep state, apparently. Or whatever you
wanna call the government because we're not just
talking about Biden's administration here. But even if
you wanna just make it about Biden's administration,
who else is he talking about?
It says, hope Lula enjoys flying commercial.
I
mean, guys, this is it's crazy to me
how this person puts himself out there like
the leader of I mean, Elon Musk is
clearly an alarming character for just about anyone
that cares about freedom and liberty at this
point. And I know might be shocking to
some to buy all the narratives. But what
he's doing is rapidly chain and again, some
people might frame this sort of like what
the left frames about him. I don't but
what they say about him is also equally
ridiculous in many cases. But some of the
things about the way that he's the way
I put it is he is becoming,
I think intentionally,
what they frame him as. Pre it's it's
some kind of engineered concept. He's turning you
into what they said you'd become when he
took over. I I don't even think it's
the majority. Quite frankly, I think most conservatives
are a little concerned about what's happening. Overall,
this
is just it's it's it's
I can't think of the right word for
it.
Hubris, obviously.
But the idea that it's it's authoritarian I
mean, ultimately, he's acting as a government and
saying, we will seize your assets because you
did this to us. Now that's all to
say, as e as Casey does, why would
the deep state
seize Brazilian assets for their sworn enemy?
Right? Okay. So he's talking about the government.
I think that's self evident.
But Biden's in power. Okay? So we're supposed
to believe that's the deep state even though
it's your government, or rather specifically the power
structure that controls our governments. But either way,
that they're the ones gonna be seizing assets.
So why would they do that for the
person who's supposed to be the sworn enemy
of them with Trump fighting back from the
inside?
Well, he again, he's literally a contractor
for them right now. So that doesn't make
sense. Or why would they have sold them
these platforms that if he he was gonna
change it all and they would just give
over their
it's as simple as thinking 1, 2, 3
to recognize that that doesn't make sense.
But it says, shouldn't the US government be
trying to take his stuff?
Now the idea of Venezuela,
we talked about this just recently in regard
to the Aurora
complexes. Now I wanted to make a point
about this before we went forward because this
also overlaps
with an interesting way with Israel in different
conversations. Now we just pointed this out. The
big conversation from the right, and I argue
a completely manufactured agenda, which I've shown many
times doesn't add up with the facts, doesn't
mean it wasn't happening. It just could have
been. But the data and the facts in
front of us
all pointed in the same direction. This was
a wildly rundown building and has been for
a very long time that was being
shut down essentially or be or or, you
know, all the problems because of the people
that were not complying with
taking care of it the right way.
And the narrative became, Venezuelan gangs took over
the building. Well, at the end of the
day, the only thing the police are saying
is that there's a gang problem in this
area, in Aurora, in general.
And here is Fox News telling you
that the department have said that there's no
They're not aware of any apartment buildings that
have been taken over by the Venezuelan gang.
Again, they could've been lying about it because
they didn't want you to see it. But
here's where this gets more interesting today. My
point was the what we can see and
prove,
there's no evidence other than this random video
circulating that is like a 4 second clip
of somebody going into a door with a
gun. You can't tell where it is, what
building it is, the other clips are all
just trash it's very strange. And New York
post seems to gobble it up and spit
it back out for all the blind followers.
But at the end of the day there's
no facts to back it up.
Polly found something very interesting. Now, this there's
a a Google Drive that was in one
of these articles that she shared with me.
And I was just,
what about the Venezuelan gangs? Property management company
was about to face a jury trial. And
I can I'll show it all to you.
It's very clear. Well before this,
for serious code violations in Aurora, Colorado, in
specifically this complex, the one that we're focusing
on. Now it says, Zev Baumgarten
bought the property 4 years ago. He's normally
a Brooklyn, New York slumlord.
Now this says all of the buildings which
have been taken over by quote, Venezuelan gangs,
are under the same management company. And again,
I'll show this to you. That also seems
a little bit odd. Right?
So are they facilitating the takeover of these
buildings?
And why would they do that if this
wasn't for some other agenda? Or is it
just being allowed? Or is it all lied
about? Who knows?
But it says, do the math. Now, to
check whether or not anything's happening with this
guy's buildings in New York City. And guess
what? They are Shabad Lubavitch.
Wow. We'll post more later. Now we haven't
gotten into that deep over the years.
Ultimately, it's a, you know, there's a it's
a Jewish religious sort of Israel, Russia kind
of overlap. I recommend looking at people like
Adam Green, for example, who have covered this
in-depth and talked about the overlaps. My point
about this is specifically
about the Zionist
potential overlap to this.
But overall, the idea that I think this
very clearly shows that it's not about Venezuelan
gangs no matter how you look at it.
Now here,
this is the drive in general, by the
way, that has and it this is the
property.
Nome Apartments 1568,
which is right here.
Just so you could see it. That that
this is the building, and I'll show you
all this.
But this the drive has a bunch of
different photos, breakdowns, and the apartment records.
Now this is the September 26, 2023 document.
Specified crime property determination notice.
Zev Baumgarten.
And you can see the address right here.
Now it says this notice is sent to
ZEV
and NOME Properties LLC as the owner of
the property located at 1568
NOME North NOME Street, Aurora, Colorado.
Criminal activity on a property is a public
nuisance
under the Aurora municipal code. Property owners expect
to be vigilant in, you know, keeping this
up.
Now it says there's an extensive criminal call
history to this property this property to include
motor vehicle theft, aggravated assault, arson, and dispute.
So the point is, as everyone's been telling,
there's crime all over this place.
But that's not what the real issue is
here.
Now the this is this one goes into
the background of just problems in the area,
disturbing the peace, threat, theft, so on, which
is is what everyone's been reporting. Even the
Denver police, Denver post, they've all made sure
this is a large city problem,
and this is one of those main locations.
Here
is what was reported
and one of the larger reasons why
actually, I'll just read this verse for
you. Why this was happening. And, this is
pretty disgusting, by the way. And I'm not
gonna go through it all. Here's, like, a
dead rat under a a fridge.
These were all reported through this municipal discussion.
And there's I'm just showing you violation after
violation of not gang related stuff but just
rundown buildings,
disgusting overrun trash, nobody doing what they're supposed
to for a really long time. Now it's
really disgusting. You can look through this stuff
and this is a really really rundown I
mean, stuff like that, that's wildly dangerous for
the podcast. It's just, like, there's
just complete disconnect from the wall and the
floor.
Anyway,
it's wild how much information this goes on
forever, and it goes on for years.
Now here's what I think is interesting. Under
this guy's name, Zev Baumgarten,
based on the search this is this is
from the,
Brave
search results.
He is a property manager associated with CBZ
Management. He is facing a trial
on 99 counts in Aurora Municipal Court in
late August according to the city of Aurora.
Additionally, the search results prove provide information
that he,
where was it?
His numbers in a New York code. We'll
get to that in a second. He's also
mentioned that the city of Aurora has been
pursuing legal action against him, citing his failure
to address substantial
long standing code violations. So you see how
easy it is to just miss repackage one
of these conversations as something that use is
useful for a political narrative?
People get lied to, and people gobble this
stuff up with no question. And my point
never has been that just not the case,
but really just what does the evidence show
us? And if there's no just explicit evidence
that proves that there's a gang that's taken
over this building, then we shouldn't keep saying
that.
But the bottom line is this is a
person based out of New York
who is basically
under serious investigation for completely letting these buildings,
more than one by the way, as Paulie
put it, a slumlord, completely get run down.
All over. Not even just this location.
And if you really wanna go through and
look at all this disgusting stuff, it's there.
And here's the full drive that has all
of these.
All these different images and different things you
can look at. Different reports from before.
So the point,
back to her
tweet, is that ultimately this guy, if you
and you can if you can oh, it's
right here. It's the so this is his,
at LinkedIn.
Hampton New, East Hampton, New York, development director
Chabad of the Hamptons.
Now that in and of itself, I'm not
in my opinion, is is just an overlap
with the Jewish conversation.
But my point is and yet there's a
lot of weird history around that conversation you
should definitely look into. Again, Adam Green's a
good person to look to for that. But
my point is simply the idea of how
obvious it is that that intersects with Zionism.
And so my point is if we weirdly
find out, as Polly showed, and check her
out for her, she's I think she's gonna
do a report on it, that they're all
owned by the same guy.
How so is it just coincidence that we're
talking about these being overtaken by Venezuelan gangs?
Or is it being allowed to happen? And
we have to overlap that with the conversation
of the interest of Israel and the conversation
of Venezuela, their interest of having that person
in power versus Maduro. And And by making
it look like Venezuelan gangs are running over
the United States, you have the United States
push to drive to make that happen. I
mean, these are all certainly possible. At the
end of the day, one thing I want
you to walk away from this conversation is
that there is republican
influencers out there that are pushing an idea
that seems to be pretty explicitly not true.
And there's also weird overlaps with the group
that they seem to not wanna focus on,
Zionism.
Now we talked about the idea of weaponized
migration. Again, that's very clear how that's a
part of this. And I think that is
examples of what we're seeing here. And if
we wanna talk about them bringing in military
age males and all this conversation, you should
direct it at the entity that I think
is truly driving this, which is like by
the way,
I actually forgot about that.
We saw the
suspected terrorist
that the republicans all jumped on and really
hyped about during this post October 7th and
said, this guy is a Hamas terrorist. See?
That's why we gotta shut the border down
until it got very quickly shown to be
not a Hamas terrorist, but in fact, a
guy that used to work for Mossad, who
was sent there and saying a lot of
suspicious things like you'll know my name.
Weird how the conversation just got dropped. Watch
it for yourself.
Because that's the point. So you only care
if it works for your narrative or you
just care about other countries using the border
to bring in people you don't want. You
see the point?
You should care about all of it, not
just or not ignore it if it happens
to tie back to Israel.
Now we also talked about the idea of
the rise of partisan psychological warfare. And I
think this is a central part of what
we're talking about as well as just the
general idea of 5th generation warfare. And I
think a lot of this is exactly what
we're dealing with. Now lastly, on the foreign
policy point
this is just interesting and I want to
include.
As Glenn writes, as we tear up the
informal rules of proxy wars, as if there
were ever any informals
as this point, by supporting the invasion of
Russian territory, which has been going on for
a while now, we should remember that one
day, the shoe will be on the other
foot.
The assumption of moral righteousness blinds us to
the disaster we are inviting. I did I
don't think it's about moral righteousness at all,
frankly. I think that ship has sailed, even
the illusion of it. But the point is
NATO approves Ukraine's advance to Russia.
We've already talked about the Kirks the the
the many times now. I think the UK
Times was reporting the US was flying in
Azov members into Russia to carry out assassinations.
They've been going after Russian territory, not defending
Ukraine, but invading.
All this shows you is this is not
about anything other than maintaining this complete mire.
They want this to be a quagmire. They
want this to be something that never goes
away.
Russia's called it out. They don't care about
Ukrainians. But at the end of the day,
Israel has a very explicit role in all
this by funding the Azov movement to create
exactly what the US is doing as well.
That's not my assumption. That's not because I'm
focusing on Israel. It's because it's simply the
fact. It's easy to prove. I've talked about
it a 1000 times. Now before we go
back into that, and this will overlap with
the polio conversation to Israel, let's talk about
one brief moment about the US conversation for
the new injections
actually around COVID 19,
which is actually happening.
And close these. I wasn't closing them as
I was going along.
This is Novavax.
They posted this on August 30th.
I've I've I've I've wanted to jump on
and talk about this on the 30th, and
I I you know, as you guys know,
there's been
reasons why I couldn't.
But I've only seen like 1 or 2
people even make this point, which I'm blown
away about. Because to me, and I I
retweeted one of them. This should be s
this should be huge right now. And maybe
I missed them, if you've seen them, let
me know. Because I wanna make sure I
promote people that are catching this point.
Novavax updated, it says, 2024
to 2025
formula.
COVID 19 vaccine now
authorized
in the United States.
It says Novavax has received
emergency use authorization
from the United States FDA, mhmm,
for its updated COVID vaccine for individuals 12
and older.
Emergency use authorization?
So do we really have to rehash this
whole conversation?
The idea that the only reason in any
sense there should be an emergency use authorization
is if we're in an emergency? And even
then, my point is that it's ridiculous and
shit the idea
ever, if it ever was done in an
honest way where it ever made sense, was
that you're in a position where things were
so dangerous
and there was no option.
So you were it was worth trying
something that might not have been tested well
enough. That's the reality of it. If you
read through the documentation, it's explicit, they still
lie about it. They even, for a moment,
tried to pretend that it's the same as
approval.
Then why wouldn't it just be approval? I
mean, they really think we're that stupid. And
you can read on their own documents where
it says exactly that. That the idea is
that you we know the risks, as that's
why they kept saying that, outweigh
or the the benefits outweigh the risks in
that moment. That ultimately or however you wanna
frame it. That the the the current risk
is so high that we're willing to chant
something that might not be ready. But then,
of course, you don't force that on people.
But either way, they did all of those
things. So now we're in a position where
we're not in an emergency, even though technically
on the books there is and they think
that's the political game.
We all know that's not what's going on.
We're not focusing on some COVID 19 pandemic.
And so the idea would be that that
would be something you would do in order
to rush it through because we're in such
danger. But again, even though that wasn't the
case, because this was never worse than the
flu if it ever existed at all based
on the current peer reviewed science.
So what's the logic here? Why are they
arguing they can rush this through
when there's no emergency?
Now the answer is this was always what
was happening.
Or going to happen. And you know this
because we've been saying it for 4 years.
Well, here they go. MRNA platform. We don't
need safety testing anymore. Yep. But then that
didn't really make sense for the bigger so
they they used the FDA, as we showed
you at the time, to extend
the emergency use authorization
forever.
Essentially.
They said, well, the emergency's over, but we're
gonna extend this part of it. I don't
remember the numbers off the top of my
head. I think it was 359,
I think. I don't wanna say it out
wrong. Whatever the the measure number was, they
were gonna extend this
essentially indefinitely.
But that didn't make sense, and I said
that at the time. There's no logical reason
to do this other than to extend out
this broken system
forever.
And that's what they're doing.
I mean, this genuinely I mean, obviously, it
should worry me, but this this is a
actually a very concerning step that I wasn't
expecting to see this soon.
Now I'll include some of these. FDA's, quote,
future framework means no more safety testing.
That was Sept June 2022.
And then, of course, the time and CIA
exposed in Kyiv as, quote, Russian bombs fall.
Same old thing every other day, isn't it?
Same thing's happening then. Oops. There's a CIA
and they've, we saw Russia do this every
single time. But also,
HHS to extend the UAE jab indemnity to
2024, and it just goes on forever. We
have I mean, we're we're technically still under
an opioid emergency. Like, these things give them
powers that they would do with whether they
whether we allowed it or not, but this
gives them a legal protection.
So we're at a point now where they're
literally pushing this forward and they're going, here,
it's for 12 and older.
Does anybody need this? Like, realize they even
broadened out the emergency in regard to bird
flu to emergency use authorized just a simple
flu shot for the seasonal flu. If we
can't piece together how obvious this is, we
don't wanna see it.
MRA platforms allow them to no longer need
safety testing. They can emergency use authorize anything
they want, it seems, without age any they
don't need safety testing, clearly. So what ultimately
is the process here? Well, we told you
that the last shot was proven safe and
effective. That's not a joke by the way.
Therefore, we can just build on that back.
We can just move from that one, change
the new protein, and you're all good. Can
you imagine anybody standing up and pretending that
what they just did was safe and effective,
so therefore, we're gonna stand on his back
and do it again at with a straight
face? That's what they're doing.
I just don't understand how this is even
possible, but here we are.
Now, on top of that, we're seeing them
give injections
to people in Gaza.
And guess what they're giving them?
The oral polio vaccine. That's not a joke.
I actually am blown away by these choices
because where is everybody? I mean, here's what's
so crazy to me, is everyone seems to
know these conversations, and yet everything seems to
keep going. I mean,
what we're always bumping up against here, guys,
is the same old thing. It's the same
old people telling you right now to vote
lesser to evil. It's the same old thing
telling you not to look at the genocide.
It's the same thing. We always get here.
Whether it's Lahaina, East Palestine,
whether it's any number of other conversations, we
get there. We see it. We go, yep.
That's it. We can prove it. And I'm
not saying every time all the time, but
I'm saying with these conversations,
the ones I'm listing off is what I'm
saying. We get to the point to where
we're like, look. This is obvious.
Israel's killing these children. They're starving and we
can prove it. They've even told you they're
doing that. Right? Here's East Palestine. We can
prove to you. They've admitted in court now.
They made it happen. They lied about it.
But guess what? The people in power don't
care. The problem is that the people in
leadership positions of the paradigm
will never let these things shift because they
don't want it to. They get you distracted
by the BS that they're pushing on the
political talking points of the day, and we
miss the large picture.
Keeps going. Glyphosate,
dioxins,
PFAS, whatever we're talking about that day. Keep
wearing sunscreen, guys, even though we know it
causes cancer. Right? Keep eating all those g
I mean, everything in front of us.
Here we are, doing the same thing over
again, expecting a different result. Welcome to the
country we're living in right now. The bottom
line is David Icke is highlighting
2 things I think are important. 1,
they're using essentially a bioweapon on these kids.
But on top of that, that he's pointing
out in his opinion, and I'll I'll give
my point on this at the end, and
I'm in the middle on this, that this
shows you that Hamas is still fully under
control of Israel,
which is one of the points I keep
pointing out on this that I don't think
we should just
accept
that it is something different. And it's certainly
possible that it simply has grown into an
actual resistance entity despite the fact that Israel
funded them until October 7th,
which is very easy to prove.
But I don't know. I think that's important
to leave it there because we don't know.
I mean, I think there's genuine action through
this entity that's pushing back against the resistance
or through the occupation.
But I'm also very worried about the fact
that they may still have ability
to pull strings here and there. Here's what
David Icke said. If anyone still needs proof
that the cutter based Hamas leadership and that's
a point that I pick all the time.
That's the most obviously stupid thing about this
whole dynamic that they're they literally have the
Hamas leadership in comfortable rooms in Qatar when
Qatar is part of the the supposed ceasefire
talks,
and we can't piece that together and knowing
that they've had them funded for a long
time. I mean, I think they're completely
that would be the difference if I had
to pinpoint it. That the leadership is still
under the control of Israel. The group is
no longer that.
But I can't know for sure. But it
says, if you need it, here it is.
The cult owned Israeli government and the cult
owned Hamas leadership see, I think he actually
I think we're saying the same thing now
that I read this more explicitly. I read
it over once the other earlier, have both
agreed to a pause in the slaughter of
Gaza children so they can be vaccinated for
polio
by the cult owned World Health Organization run
by Bill Gates on behalf of the WHO
creators and Rockefellers.
Now, I mean, the idea that they and,
like, this is what everybody would point out
and a lot of people are. How insulting
it is to pretend like they're gonna try
to murder all these people and then go,
but wait. We We wanna make sure you
don't get polio.
Or, that they can pause all of this
to bring in shots, but not food.
I mean, it's just everything in this is
the point that I I was just making.
We all know what's going on. Do we
really need to pretend like they're not just
murdering, torturing, testing,
gleefully hurting these kids, hurting everybody in front
of them, destroying their lives, wearing their clothing,
burning their houses down, laughing about it, sharing
high fives about it, and we're all supposed
to talk intellectual about how they're we're gonna
raise the issue and then come on. We
all know what's going on. Everybody knows what's
going on. Everybody everywhere knows what's going on.
And that's what's so disgusting about how clear
this is.
But the point is obvious that this is
not about helping these kids. He says, are
we supposed to believe that the leaders of
Hamas, an organization
brought brought into being by Israel are so
brain dead that they allow the same force
that is bombing Gaza kids to vaccinate them?
He makes a good point.
How does that make sense?
Because they care about the children? He says
it's insane. Hamas, of course, was all for
the fake COVID vaccines for Gazans, which most
of the Palestinians, it seems, were resistant against.
So he makes an excellent point.
Or it could just be that the people
certain positions are able to be manipulated. Right?
But it says the Hamas leadership condemns Israel's
mass murder in Gaza,
then they if
then
it says the the Hamas leadership condemns Israel's
mass murder in Gaza when they would have
known
when they were allowed to okay. I'm not
reading that wrong. Hamas leadership condemns Israel's mass
murder in Gaza
when they would have known when they were
allowed by Israel to breach the fence on
October 7th that the consequences would be for
Gaza's civilians and children. It's a poorly written
sentence, but the point is they would have
known it would have blown back on them.
We have seen it over and over in
response to the pop gun rockets delivered by
Hamas into Israel.
What did the Hamas leadership living in luxury
Qatar think was going to happen after what
they ordered in the attack on Israeli civilians?
It was obvious what was going to happen
and when the Israeli government sought an excuse
to happen.
Why hasn't Cutter, allies of the west and
controlled by the cult like
all those these Arabs god. I'm gonna have
the hard time reading these things right now.
I'm sorry.
Now the bottom line he's making, as you've
already made clear, is that it doesn't make
sense for this to happen.
Why hasn't Qatar, allies of the west and
controlled by the cult,
like all these Arab fake royals in as
in Saudi Arabia, been sanctioned by targeted
I'm just reading terribly, I guess. Been sanctioned
and targeted by Israel and its allies for
harboring the Hamas leadership in hotels
down the road from the Al Ulloud base
airbase, home to the US military central command
in the Middle East. Qatar has indeed been
designated by the White House as a major
non NATO ally of the United States.
All these questions can be answered when you
see that the Israeli government and Hamas leadership
are on the same cult team. Gaza and
Israeli citizens, civilians,
have to realize that they are both being
played by the same force that controls the
Israeli government. Hamas leadership, the United States, Europe,
NATO, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the EU a the
UAE,
UAE, excuse me, and and the whole bloody
lot of them. So, again, I'm pretty sure
we're talking this about the same point. We're
talking about the leadership, not necessarily all of
Hamas. Until that penny drops, nothing can change
as 2 civilian populations controlled by the same
evil force are played off of each other.
The cult hates you both, Arab and Jew,
and that's the game that almost no one
can see. So sorry for my reading that
terribly. The bottom line, he got the point.
I just wanna make sure I read his
thoughts.
Now here is Tedros saying that we're gonna
bring these in. Now the scary part about
this is they're actually agreeing, and that's what
he's talking about.
Israel's military and Palestinian group, Hamas, have agreed
to 3 separate zone 3 day pauses. Now
you could one thing you could argue is
that they did this in order to benefit
from the pauses, and maybe they'll do it.
But at the end of the day, you're
still allowing, which seems to already be happening,
Israel to give these children something that I
can almost guarantee is not in their benefit.
So so three pauses apparently in Gaza to
allow for the first round of vaccination of
almost 650,000
children.
That's terrifying to me because of for multiple
reasons.
1st,
here is, I'm I'm blanking on the it's
the that vaccinology,
podcast.
But listen to what they had to say
about this. They're telling you that they're
explicitly that these things are almost guaranteed
to spread polio, which, by the way, shouldn't
be that shocking, seeing as how we already
know this.
This is The Washington Post
from 2020.
UN says new polio outbreak in the Sudan
was caused by the oral polio vaccine, which
even then wasn't news. We knew that in
India. We knew that from Gates doing this.
And how is it now possible that we
keep forgetting this is gonna actually get people
sick? That's why we have to recognize
this is a weapon.
There's no way around that. This is something
that is spreading people's illness.
Here's what they had to say.
Allow the, the vaccines in. But what vaccine
are they using, Vincent?
Well, unfortunately, they're using OPV 2 and OPV
2, which, is the infectious attenuated Sabin vaccine
derivative. And this is being used because it's
easy. You just have it in a vial
and the kid drinks it. But, it reintroduces
Sabin. I mean, the the case of polio
in Gaza is caused by vaccine derived poliovirus
type 2.
So first,
he's telling you right there,
the thing that caused this in Gaza, just
like all the other ones, just so happened
to be the exact same thing they're giving
them to treat it.
That in and of itself seems ridiculous, or
it is ridiculous.
It's in fact, I think, demeant to be
harmful.
So the more you put OPV 2 into
the population, the more such cases you have.
And what should be done is to use
an activated injected polio vaccine,
but they've decided to use an Now now
even then, arguably, I think a lot of
people are also gonna say, well, you know,
nothing at this point because of how skeptical
they are and rightly so. Either way,
the point is that they chose to give
them thing that was seemingly guaranteed to increase
their illness. L p v 2. So it
will just perpetuate this endless cycle of vaccine
derived viruses causing paralysis because there always are
people who are not immunized everywhere for such
cases you have. And what should be done
is to use an activated injected polio vaccine,
but they've decided to use the nlpv2. So
it will just perpetuate this endless cycle of
vaccine derived viruses causing paralysis because there always
are people who are not immunized everywhere. Yeah.
So the me the point is that you're
giving this to a population where it's going
to spread to others because they don't have
it. So this is a weapon, guys. So
in and of itself, you could argue that
this thing is sort of here's what's important
to think about, though.
What he's saying is twofold.
Taking this thing, you can get polio. But
somebody around you taking it, it can shed
and give you polio. How this I mean,
how do we pretend this is anything other
than a bioweapon?
I mean, it's incredible to me. But so
the bottom line is this is going I
mean, these are experts. These are people that
have spoken about, and I believe this guy,
if I remember correctly, on his podcast was
the one that was not not necessarily
saying the vaccine
from COVID was hurt at killing everybody. Maybe
it's changed now. I don't know. My point
would be that this isn't somebody that's, like,
perceived as the conspiracy theorist. And here they
are telling you the reality based on the
scientific literature that these things will spread polio.
Now the real question is, did that happen
already? I think the answer is an unequivocal
yes. The reason this is even there to
begin with comes from Israel. Let's get into
that. And don't forget, this is not up
for debate. What's funny is you can show
this to people as the United Nations, or
that it's on the Washington Post, and they're
telling you that this very injection, or I
shouldn't call it that, this
it's hard because I don't wanna call it
a vaccine either. This jab the jab doesn't
make sense because you're putting it in their
mouth. But this oral,
contraceptive I don't know. This oral vaccine
is proven to cause polio. But yet when
you talk about it, even though you show
this and even though you can have the
people still call you anti vaxx
because people are crazy. It's as simple as
that. But here, shadowed out who put this
out. This is new footage from the massive
vaccine effort in Gaza. This is from yesterday.
It's already happening,
which frankly scares the this terrifies me, guys.
So why is anybody doing this? I mean,
they're scared. They don't know any better.
You get it. Just I mean, that that
shot alone right there. You know?
That's that's too late. It's out there.
Now Vanessa Bailey writes,
around 45% of Gaza population would be considered
children
under 18.
Out of a population of 1,200,000,
that's 600,000.
It's slight very slightly varying depending on where
you get the figures. Israel has been slaughtering
children without a ceasefire for 11 months.
And and you could argue deliberately, which I
definitely think is the case, or just because
it's indiscriminate. Either way, her point is the
same. That you're there's so all these children
are suffering, And that means they don't care
about them, quite obviously.
Whatever your vaccine perception,
why would Israel suddenly allow 1,000,000 polio vaccines
into Gaza and agree to a vax ceasefire
to quote, save the children?
When they themselves, this is me adding this,
have explicitly
said in the Knesset, mind you, most of
them that I've seen, that these people simply
grow up to be terrorists so we can't
allow them to live. Or that the children
are guilty, the children are responsible. I've seen
them say these things. I've shown you on
the show in their in in their in
this case, for the people of the United
States, in their version of the congress. Openly
saying this.
To her point,
why would they do this?
Why would they save the children they have
publicly declared they want to exterminate?
That's why I said that. So you don't
think she's made that's provable.
Not just all not just Palestinians, but children
explicitly.
She writes, some may say that the international
community has put pressure on them.
What pressure have they put so far that's
ended the genocide? Or even slowed down weapon
sales?
Now you could argue the ICCICJ,
but not basically anybody else. Who is controlling
genocide, who's who is controlling genocide? Israel.
Ask yourself these questions and never trust a
genocidal Zionist. Nothing ever will be done for
the benefit of a Palestinian child.
1,000,000 vaccines,
600,000
children.
Half the population.
Children are the next Palestinian generation.
Children are the Zionist target.
And the siege and the genocide provide clean
water, sanitation, food, fuel, medicine, and the occupation,
and the Zionist regime, no more polio. Simple
as that.
Now Arnab Petran writes, the Orwellian language of
calling, quote, humanitarian
a pause to vaccinate kids against polio in
Gaza when they'll resume killing and displacing them
in their sick version of Hunger Games immediately
afterwards.
So on top of it all, you know
they're gonna go right back to bombing them,
so what is the point?
So either that means that it's just a
sick joke, or that I genuinely think there's
something far darker happening here.
What are they doing to these kids?
N y plaid has a great article here
or played. I've already pronounced that.
So Israeli, bioterrorism, and the UN's complicity.
It says the emergence of circulating vaccine derived
poliovirus type 2, which is what they were
talking about in that clip, in Gaza, a
a region previously polio free for 33
years, should raise the question,
how did it get there?
Polio type 2 entered Gaza through the Israeli
occupation. This isn't up for debate. This is
easy to show. The methods include their soldiers
shedding post vaccination
and through the sewage from a settlement
which redirected its waste in Northern Gaza.
And you know what that's talking about?
That's talking about
the bray
the hubris for the the boastful
Eric Prince saying, we gave them the technology
to flood Gaza. And do you know how
many times I made that point while it
was happening? I said, look at all this
flooding in the streets when there's not even
raining. Why? They were doing it on purpose.
And they've admitted it now. I made that
point while it was happening.
And what does that mean? It's full of
sewage and full of all and
possibly even what they put in there. Shouldn't
be something you back at right now. But
the point is that you can this is
what he's highlighting, and you can this is
the all the source materials in in this
article.
That they're redirected
sewage, not water.
Sewage from a settlement into Gaza because they
wanted to flood it. That was part of
the way they did this, but that is
almost guaranteed in a place without any way
to clean, any way to sanitize, any way
to heal that you're going to get people
sick.
And then you add in your oral polio
vaccine to either giving to people in Israel
or maybe just putting it in the water,
that you end up getting them sick.
That's what happened.
It says all major media outlets that reported
on the first case of polio 2 in
Gaza from the July 2024 simply neglected to
mention its origins.
Israel was the origin of the out of
both the outbreak and the vaccine campaigns in
2022, which was publicly written about.
And it's it lit literally says that they
found it in the sewage in the location
that they have diverted into Gaza.
Then it goes on to say, our colleague
reported on polio being extinct from Gaza over
for over 33 years.
Guess who that was? Guess who started pointing
out that Israel
was turning this into a biowarfare campaign?
Sarah Wilkinson.
Sarah and other MENA uncensored roving reporters initiated
a campaign raising awareness on the need for
a vaccine campaign
with the appropriate conditions to save Palestinians from
increased mortality. The, quote, Israeli occupation
is using polio vaccine to intentionally spread the
disease.
Traces of polio found in Gaza sewage, health
ministry says. IDF to ensure all troops serving
Gaza are vaccinated or given booster shots. She
says after the Israel flooded Gaza with polio
after 33 years of being synced, she called
this in July 21st.
This think about how crazy that is, guys.
This is exactly what happened. Now and my
point is, I think this has to do
with her well, she probably tells this article,
being arrested.
The deliberate omission of Israelis'
use of chemical and biological warfare is nothing
new. It's really not. People like Vanessa Bieli
and Eva Bartlett have been covering this for
a very long time. Abby Martin.
It says Leila Hatoum was has covered Israeli
use of chemical weapons for years,
And it was one of the first to
report such use not long after operation O
Aksa flood.
This is just horrifying. You can see this
image
for yourself.
It says the agent in the bombs left
this young girl blind. Look at her face.
Now they've been doing this for a very
long time. Abby Martin's been writing about this.
You whatever the supposed tear gas they use,
it kills people.
It it people go into seizures. They never
are the same afterward. Literally, all those things
have happened. And they dump this stuff in
streets full of children and women.
And they say it's tear gas. We don't
know. And they're they're explicitly lying to you.
It's easy to prove.
This is what they've been doing. That's why
they use weapons that they've never used before.
And they sell them and they call them
battle tested. As they're bombing into areas full
of children.
Watch watch this not play.
Okay. Yep. See?
Maybe that's me moving it.
What I keep noticing is Twitter
yeah. Maybe that's just me moving it. Yeah.
So what I keep noticing though, sometimes it'll
just auto stop the video constantly. Anyway,
it says Israel using chemical agents in in
Gaza. We're warned of this 2 weeks ago.
And by the way, in case you are
confused, white force white phosphorus is chemical warfare.
Period. There's no way around it. And they've
been exposed for doing that,
I don't know,
10 times?
Here's just Human Rights Watch from before and
after October 7th.
Reign of Fire, 2009.
Israel's unlawful use of white phosphorus. It it'll
literally melt the skin off your body, And
that's what they use it for. Here's October
12th. Israel, white phosphorus in Gaza and Lebanon.
It's funny how these things just keep happening
and nobody cares. Right?
God, this is what I'm talking about in
the beginning, guys.
It's the same controlling entities that are telling
you right now to vote the lust of
2 evils and allow this stuff to keep
going without concern.
Now
goes on. Israel's use of biological weapons on
civilians has been, reported from January.
From January 8th. So according to my medical
sources from behind enemy lines, so take that
with a grain of salt, you know, who
knows what what her sources are in in
Gaza. We now know that it is not
a fungal infection. And by the way, I've
heard this from doctors who have come back
and spoken about this on BBC and anywhere
else that they literally have some kind of
weird infection
that they just can't deal. Largely because they
don't have what they need. Right? But this
has caused something to go out of control.
I remember remember these there it's worse than
it ever been, but there was a moment
when people really focusing on the numbers.
There's something like 600,000
people with with ex like, explosive diarrhea.
Hundreds of thousands of people with extreme
bacterial infections and all sorts I mean, it's
that's that's just the stuff that's I mean,
even that could be deadly with what you're
dealing with. That's not even getting into the
stuff that's, like, life altering forever. But this
is the whole place. They're being tortured simply
by being left in a position that this
stuff is rampant or by driving it intentionally,
which I'm convinced is happening.
So what we know now is that not
a fungal infection. It is certainly not a
parasite bite. That it that is killing Israeli
occupation soldiers at hospitals and causing many to
lose their limbs.
Now that, you could argue oops. Gosh darn
it.
Okay. Good. I didn't want to
Okay. Good. For the podcast, I thought I
actually highlighted everything and lost my place.
Where were we? Here.
So So the point is, if you remember
this, there the be and this this point
is simply about the
no water, no no medical care. Just a
any situation like this where there's no walking
water, no sewage, and you don't have any
way to clean, it's guaranteed to eventually cause
something bad. And so that's the point, is
even when they were there, the soldiers themselves
were getting sick. And so Sarah Wilkerson
was punished, they write, for raising awareness on
Israel's use of Poldigo type 2 as a
bioweapon, meant to inflict pain, suffering, and death
on the children in Gaza. Sarah
was then interestingly detained, held, and subsequently prevented
from ever using social media to report on
crimes committed by apartheid Israel.
As you can see here, we talked about
this at the time, pro genocide and and
right now for that same point because she
apparently, she's been released, but she's not I
mean, I think she's done an interview, but
I think at the most part, she's not
allowed to use any of her work, you
know, which in and of itself. Think about
how they can argue you're not allowed to
use electronics.
So it's a Sarah's awareness
efforts live on through Mina uncensored team. Before
she was detained, Sarah and Mina uncensored team
recorded a space, which you should listen to,
covering Israeli use of biological chemical weapons use
in Gaza. That was August 26th.
August 26th. Certainly could be a coincidence, but
I find it hard to believe.
She makes a big point about this. They
make an entire discussion where she's gonna start
breaking down how they're using polio to infect
it. Boom. She gets arrested.
In her absence online, we will, they write,
continue to be breaking down Israel's debt Israel's
definition of victory being closer
when the mass spread of disease hits Gaza.
The point they're the the point they're making
here is that, ultimately, these
officials were speaking about how we're now getting
closer and at the same time as well
as the fact that they publicly said if
it were to happen, that this would bring
their the end of the war closer.
Robert wrote about the same thing in this
article right here.
Israel was deliberately causing the spread of infectious
disease in Gaza. Look at that. July 20,
2024. He was way ahead of the story,
like Sarah was, like a lot of people
were, because we're paying attention.
Now it says when it says, let's spell
it out for you, it says the Israelis
were behind the spread of the lab manufactured,
that's what it is, polio type 2 virus
in occupied Palestine. Sounds like a weapon to
me. Which originate originally spread in apartheid Israel
controlled areas in 2022.
The same people that brought you COVID 19
are back at it again with polio type
2. Now to me, you could argue I
I more argued that this was not so
much a I mean, look. You could the
way he's framing it, you could argue this
was an accident.
But my point would be that this is
either being done to their own people in
order to spread it into Gaza, or it
wasn't ultimately spread through Israel. That was the
narrative and it was dumped into Gaza. However
you wanna put this, it's obvious to me
as their own statement show that this is
being done to Gaza
in every possible way.
Now he goes on talking about WHO overlap.
Interest of time, I'll let you read this
for yourself, but the points are obvious. Same
things we would discuss. The obvious overlap of
the Gates' influence and what WHO is complicit
in regard to the vaccination process and what
they've allowed because they're the ones facilitating the
transfer of these. But I'll be more worried
about the idea of Israel because they're the
middle man.
They're the ones that are gonna take these
and use them.
They they're the they're the ones in between.
So how do we know they're not doing
something? How do we know they're not just
letting them sit out too long in order
to hurt them even more? I mean, that's
where I come from with this, and that
that really does worry me. And I think
wait there one more point, I think.
Maybe not. So, great work on this. Make
sure you check it out for yourself.
Here again was Eric Prince telling you that
he told them or showed them, gave them
a tech how on how to flood it.
So he's responsible in a way, in part.
Now doctor Ali Tawil, which by the way
everyone I think feels right now, and it's
not because you're anti anything, it's simply because
it's logical to feel this way. He says,
I don't trust the polio vaccines that have
entered the Gaza Strip, which nobody should. They're
dangerous. They don't work. They're clearly the worst
that they're causing polio. So why would you
use them to stop polio?
And he says, I don't trust WHO. I
don't trust the United Nations. I don't trust
drug companies. I'm terrified, he said.
I mean, I this this is where a
lot of people are because look at what's
happening.
Nothing seems to change anything. Now, here's what
Elon Levy put out. And I wanna make
a quick point about this. One, about the
idea that you now have Elon Levy
using well, really the larger point. How many
times I brought up the idea of the
Bemis children?
It's it's,
incessant.
And they all do it when the whenever
time it rises, you'll see it trickle through
all of them. The Israeli main account, Elon
Levy, Elvira Klompas, Hen Bzseg, they all all
these major ones out there will jump out
and make the same points.
UNICEF says we're bringing vaccines for the children.
And he says, among those 640,000
children, what preparations are you making to vaccinate
Kaffir and Arial Bivas?
Well, first of all, the idea that you've
been starving everybody in this country and then
you act like they're now responsible for the
game is it's absurd
that this is the focal point.
There's no indication that the the I mean,
in fact, put it the other way. Every
indication so far that shows you that these
people are not only taking care of their
hostages, but in fact, going out of their
way to make sure they get food when
nobody else does.
That's not my opinion, guys. Listen to the
people that have come home. Listen to what
the I mean, look at what you can
see right now based on all the evidence.
But that's not even the point I'm making.
The point is, every time there's an opportunity,
these absolute
sociopathic
monsters
use the name of children that the father
already told us have been killed by IDF
bombs.
Which, by the way, will bring us into
the next point about how IDF bombs are
killing the hostages.
Here is their father.
Now, yes, it's a video that was put
out while he was in while while he's
in their custody.
But the point is, at whether hostage, p
d or POW, whatever the reality is.
But guess what?
Every single one of these videos have later
been shown to be true. Every single one
of them.
Every time we get one, they go, oh,
they forced them to say that. It's propaganda.
Well, guess what? They come out and they
maintain their story. Every single one of them.
The one that said their family were killed
while they were there came out and said,
yep. They were killed by IDF bombs. We
were terrified. I lost my hearing by the
IDF bombs. And they just scramble and deflect.
They come out and say they treated me
kindly. They bought us a pizza. They took
us shopping. I mean, my god. It's ridiculous.
And they screech about how they made her
clean dishes.
Oh, oh, wait a minute. I thought it
was rape and torture. Now it's dishes?
Meanwhile, here you are giving children rape and
torture and dried rice and acting like that's
somehow the right way to do things.
I'm not supporting any dynamic here as I
thought I made clear in regard to the
fact that Israel is funding Hamas. But the
facts matter. So my point is, as I
wrote here, all of well, I'll I'll say
that in a second just so I'll make
it out the point of what he's saying
because here they are doing that.
But they know that the father came out
and said IDF bombs killed these children.
So at best, they don't know. But the
bottom line is, they keep, at every opportunity,
using them because one, right in the beginning,
they made this weird creepy push about them
being the redheads,
and they used them all over the place.
It was really weird.
On top of
that,
they're using them right now to make it
about their the only example of kids that
they still have in this dynamic. The lie
about the children were killed on October 7th
was shown. There's only 2 in that entire
dynamic. 1 of them was shot by IDF,
and the other one was, I think died
in the hospital later about and both of
them overlap with whatever happened at the Hannibal
directive.
They've lied about 40 petted babies. They've lied
about babies in an oven. They've lied about
15 babies on a clothesline. I mean, their
obsession with this is disgusting.
Now to be very clear as again, as
always,
Hamas taking these kids was a crime, and
they should be held accountable for it. That's
never been up for debate. They weren't POWs.
They weren't members of the military. They that's
a crime.
But the fact that they bomb indiscriminately and
kill their own hostages and shoot at them
as they flee shows you that they don't
care about them. So, yes, nobody's saying Hamas
is somehow not the culprit in regard to
who took them. But the fact that people
like Elon Levy continue to use their names
even though they know they're dead
shows you that they don't care about anything
but their agenda. And frankly, I think they
would kill them if they got the opportunity.
That's not my opinion. Look at what they've
done. They've been killing children everywhere. On top
of, they can kill their own people every
chance they get. We'll get into that next.
But ask yourself,
how?
They all keep doing it. I said, what
did I keep telling you? The monster is
referring to the Beavis kids, who we damn
well know were killed by the IDF bombs,
as even Noah just reiterated, is the case
while they were there.
The bombs, we're afraid of. That's what everyone's
scared of. The bombs are killing people. They're
hostages. Yep. I'll show you these provable examples.
Now the again, that's according to their father,
who said this openly,
yet they continue to use them for propaganda.
Doesn't that just creep you out?
Here's Elijo Klompas.
Israel has agreed to pause the fighting for
polio vaccine. Same exact thing. And again, and
they know because I posted this because it's
they know these videos have come out. They've
all seen them. They were the ones going,
they made them say it. They know it's
there.
All I said all of these Zionists continue
to use the Biba's children for their genocidal
propaganda, even though their father publicly admitted they
were killed by IDF bombs months ago, which
they know. How to pray if can you
be? And here's Dan Cohen, making sure we
know that in the reporting by CBS News,
they were forced to admit.
They were forced to acknowledge that they were
killed by I Israeli air strikes.
Doesn't matter though. You see my point? They
don't care. It's about getting you emotionally invested
because you think those kids are suffering, even
though they're the ones that bomb them.
Here's the main Israel account. Your daily reminder,
apparently, about these 2 children. Well, how about
the daily reminder of the 2 children that
died in Gaza because you murdered them while
I was just speaking?
And the 2 children just got killed during
that pause. What about those children?
Because that's what's happening, guys. A child every
10 minutes currently is for at least the
last time I checked, is being killed by
Israel. And let's not forget that those are
children being shot
by sniper fire that even the doctors have
admitted. When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. What you're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have two children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest. I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately.
And
Now, I've played that before. I'll maybe play
it again later. I think it's one of
the most impactful clips I've seen in this
conversation of a Jewish doctor from Gaza who
is not a Palestinian, who is telling you
how they're explicitly
executing children.
Oh, but here's Israel going, care we care
about these children even though we bomb them.
Kills me. Absolutely kills me. So when you
see this come up, make a point about
it. Tag me in it. These guys are
using these children
while they murder children. Now in case you
wanna in case you're confused about how
sociopathic,
psychopathic these maniacs are,
here's an Israeli journalist,
Apparently, a PhD. And guess what? An expert
on Arab affairs.
That's not a joke.
So in case you didn't see the story
oh, did I not grab that? I swear
I grabbed that. Hold on. The story is,
a this was from yesterday, I believe.
A contract A UN worker
was killed Oh, really?
By Israeli airstrikes.
It's a public story.
I was just hoping to get you the
whatever. Also, I want to get you a
version you can actually read. I don't know
why this is not on the way back
machine
or any of the archives, but you the
contractor killed in Israel in in Israeli strike.
You can see that at least, the Washington
Post. This is from yesterday.
Here
is what this journalist wrote about it. That's
the car.
You know, hold on. I swear I had
an article oh well.
You could see it right there. I just
wanted to read I think I I I
maybe this wasn't on there before. The point
is the first line talks about, you know,
where it was and so on. I'll read
you from their articles as well.
Let's do this.
Let's see. Here we go.
That's just one of the other articles I
had up. UN contract worker killed in Israel
is in Israeli strike over southern Lebanon. So
it's in Lebanon.
So that's the point then. This is from
Associated Press, just so you know. So this
this
definitely happened.
They bombed a car with UN workers in
it.
Nothing new there. Right? Seems to happen every
day right now. Weird how you don't hear
this in the western press.
Guess what the journalist said?
Grilled kebab with grilled onions.
I mean, how is it possible these people
are able to get away with such impunity?
I mean, this is this is something that
needs to jolt you free from what the
world is like. Like, or rather what you
currently the the stupor we're in that we
believe, like, the way to frame it is
we are all trapped in this illusion of
what we think is really going on.
The reality for someone to be able to
be as a as a public journalist on
Twitter come out and point at a murder
of UN workers
and say grilled onions and kebab,
laugh about it, and have the medium is
the government officials come on, go, is it
we don't we'll look into it. We're investigating.
And they're all laughing and cheering it on
because they are calling the UN hamas.
It really is something so there's something it's,
it's more than just wrong. Right? There's something
very unnerving about how the world, rather specifically
the power structures, are pretending like, this is
the thing I said from the very beginning.
It's not just that it's happening, it's that
they're looking at it and going, that's a
good thing. Right? No. No. No. It's not
genocide. We're we're fighting for ourselves. We're in
the we're fighting for the freedom of Jews.
No. You're not. You're murdering children.
And the Jews in the world are starting
to call that out.
But there's just something specifically dark about this
that I, you know, that it's happening so
often. Right? And so it does it's not
even deleted. Usually, they delete these things. I
have it on the archive in case he
does.
Tigrid Al Mawid
says a Zionist entity's drone killed 2 Lebanese
civilians by targeting a car in Nakur. The
vehicle belonged to the service company with a
UN contract. Lebanon insists that the UN must
stop Israel's aggression,
citing past attacks on UN forces.
Roger Blackwell says, and this is citing Vanessa
Bealey, quote, there are 2 deaths reported in
the targeted assassination in Al Makwahr,
both in a clearly marked vehicle who operates
as a civilian contractor to the UN forces.
David Roth Roth Lindbergh, 2 deaths reported, same
location. Southern Lebanon. They were traveling in a
clearly marked UN vehicle.
It doesn't matter.
I've talked about this before as well.
Think this is the one. Right in the
beginning, I think this was like 3 days
past October 7th,
Israel bombed a Reuters journalist
in Lebanon.
No. It's not the one.
That one.
And the point is that it was explicit.
I called it out the day it happened
because it was undeniable. All of the factors
lined up and there's no way around it.
Israel, Reuters journalists killed by Israeli bombing. It
took Reuters, like, more than a week to
even acknowledge it.
What about that guy? What about the person's
family?
Right? So part going back to collateral damage,
apparently. They can just murder journalists from Reuters,
and no one cares. Maybe you should stop
working for Reuters then.
The bottom line is they're getting away with
this right in front of us. Now the
only reason I argue that the genocide is
being called out is because there's just no
ignoring it. But this is just straight up
assassination, guys. This is who the Israeli government
is. And they're journalists, and a lot of
the people in that society are going, yay.
Kebabs and onions. Who cares about human life
if they're Palestinian?
That's something that is a learned
psychopathy.
Now let's talk about the hostages that they
claim were killed.
BBC writes, Israel recovers bodies of 6 Gaza
hostages.
Now you'll find it interesting in this article,
and along with pretty much a lot of
the Western press, that they're not going they
were killed or assassinated.
They're saying they died.
And what's interesting is that I think a
part of it is the fact that they've
been burned so many times. Not not not
that they care about the truth, I don't
think they do. But Israel keeps giving them
narratives they dump out in the a doubt
out in their papers, then 30 seconds later,
there's people like us going, look at how
stupid you are for blindly reporting what they
told you when you can look right there
and see that they lied. Or here, they
shot them. Here's the evidence. Here, they are
laughingly posting videos about how they did the
opposite.
And the BBC and Fox News and CNN,
all the rest of them,
they're like, they like, they've been embarrassed, like,
15 times since this started. Since post October
7th, anyway.
So here, they're like, they died because I
think we're all very aware that Israel lies
about everything.
Literally everything. Even sometimes it seems like there's
no reason they lie about it. That lie
later shoots them in the foot. Let me
let me preface these remarks with I never,
never, ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars
in their intelligence community, in their propaganda community,
certainly,
and in their leadership.
They are inveterate
liars.
Yep. Wilkers and tell them the truth. They
are. I mean, it's it's what they do.
Through Like, what is it the I said
this last time, I forgot. The the the
masaad motto is Or motto
is, through through deceit, thou shall wage war
or something like that. It's it's their actual
motto, right? I mean, so so the bottom
line is that I
think everybody was thinking like, who we don't
know. If all we know is that they're
dead,
you saying that they were all killed when
the evidence isn't there, we we know you
lied to us. So we don't and I
think to some degree, it might be part
of what's happening. But here's what the BBC
wrote. Israel says its forces have recovered the
bodies of 6 hostages held by Hamas in
the Gaza Strip. In a statement, the IDF
said the bodies were located on Saturday
in an underground tunnel in Rafa. Of course,
they are. Now right there,
I find that very hard to believe. This
is a location that Israel claims they had
secured which is why they moved them into
the area.
Right? Or you could pretend that they didn't
and they said move into an area where
there might be Hamas, they will bomb you
later, which might as well make sense anyway.
The point is they bomb, they don't care
anyway. They bomb all the safe zones, there
is no safe zone. My point though is
that they claimed that this was something that
they were in some control of. And then
eventually, it came back around to where was
the focal point. And that was what we
all knew because it wasn't about any one
location. It was about destroying all Palestinians.
But to pretend
that somehow the last focal point like, their
argument is Hamas kept moving down the line
and moving in these areas. Every single hostage
that has come home
has told you a very different story than
what they keep telling us. They were in
houses. They were on donkey carts moving around.
So it but they just keep tripling down.
So I don't believe for a second that
they just happened to be in the one
location everybody was pushing back on. And you're
seeing that everywhere. Oh, yeah? All rise all
eyes on Rafa, Too bad we found them
there. Too bad we couldn't do it sooner.
Their whole narrative is you stopped us and
they were die they killed they were killed
because you were pushing back on us going
into Rafa.
Well, what about all the other 40 hostages
you've killed in the process? You've only actually
rescued 4, and then I don't even believe
that's what happened. Some of these people stumbled
out, and you just happened to not shoot
them like the other 3 you killed. I'll
show you in a second. It's right here.
We've talked about it plenty of times.
My point is this none of this makes
any sense.
So Rafa in and of itself, I think,
stands out as an obvious point of them
using
the whole situation. Which is why one of
the things that I my gut tells me
is that these people were probably killed a
long they probably found them a long time
ago, and they've been waiting to use them.
If you don't think they're capable of that,
then you're not paying attention. Now, I'm not
saying I that's just my my pin my
opinion. And I'm always very clear when I
give my opinion.
And I'm allowed to give my opinion. That's
free speech. But my point is in regard
to facts, we don't
know. And when you have a situation where
Israel is screaming a narrative that very clearly
is all about their interest when
you know where I'm going. Probably at least
question that they might be lying to you
because that's what usually seems to be the
case. And if you just go from October
7th forward, that's a damn near guarantee. They've
lied about almost everything.
It's not my opinion.
Look.
It's very clear. Now spokesman,
Daniel Hagari.
What a perfect person to insert in this
conversation. He's the one that said an initial
assessment was that they were brutally murdered by
Hamas terrorists shortly after we reached them.
Or shortly before.
Well, so one of the narratives right there
is that this is something that people are
arguing is they were this was made aware
that if you come in, we're gonna shoot
them. So you could argue simply that they
did this in order to make that happen.
And the very least, you know Hannibal directive
shows you they don't care about these people.
That's what their own people are saying before
you start calling me a racist. The bottom
line,
this is Daniel Hagari.
There is a list. Oh, you mean that
calendar with Hebrew writing that didn't say anything
other than days of the week? Yes.
Like, if they actually think that people are
that stupid,
well, that's makes sense. Like, just recognize the
guy who's telling you that they were murdered
is the guy who told you a calendar
in Hebrew was a list of how to
kill children, or whatever he said it was,
how to murder Jews. It was a ridiculous
claim like the chemical weapons book, like the
mind conf book, like the idea that they
had instructions on how to rate people. And
these people are really bad at this. I
don't know how they ever influenced anybody. Bottom
line, I don't know why we'd ever trust
this person when this guy explicitly
has been caught lying routinely in this conversation.
He's a he is literally a meme today.
A senior Hamas official, of course, insisted Israel
was responsible for their deaths. Well, there you
go. Consider which one you want. Obviously, that's
how it's gonna go. Hamas killed them, they
wouldn't say, yes. We did. They I mean,
maybe. But at the end of the day,
usually, you have you can't take them at
face value, whatever the sides are. Right? But
just for the sake of con the sake
of the point, Hamas is claiming they didn't.
They're saying that Israel was responsible. Now you
could argue it's because of them coming in.
Right? But it says Israel prime minister Benjamin
Netanyahu said Israel would not rest until those
responsible were killed and brought to justice. So
right there, you can at least argue that's
Netanyahu
using what he made happen to continue to
do what he wants, which by the way
is what the Israeli media has been saying
about him and war in Gaza as far
back as you can look.
Lying about bombs in order to justify something
to get him elected,
that they I mean, I could pull up
5 different articles of them saying that for
the last 20 years, that he would fake
something in Gaza to benefit himself or that
he would lie or he would murder people,
judge, start a war just to benefit. Yep.
That's who he is. They know that. Seems
like the west can't
really grasp that at least in their one
side of the conversation.
But if you if him using this to
say we won't rest, well, guess what? The
only person he wants is that is it
who wants that is Netanyahu.
I'll get to it in a second in
regard to the Israeli population by and large
wants him to take a deal. Not because
of Palestinians. I'll make that point in a
second. But because they want their families home
or because they think that
Netanyahu is allowing them to die for his
benefit. They're all saying these things. So when
he stands up or BBC quotes him as
saying, we're not gonna rest until,
nobody wants that. Literally nobody other than him.
Even half of his government's telling him not
to do that.
But here we are in this stupid dynamic
where the West pretends like this makes sense.
Now it says, whoever murders hostages does not
want a deal. Okay. Let's take that at
face value. What about all the hostages you've
killed?
Your own hostages. 40 plus of them. What
about all the hostages you have in your
own prisons you kill on a regular basis?
What about the guy you you literally raped
to death? What about that guy?
So apparently, you don't wanna deal, which by
the way, he's right because he doesn't. That's
clear.
I actually don't know whether or not Hamas
was part of the one responsible for killing
these people. But I also it's very clear
whether or not they have killed some of
these people, which does seem to be the
case, that they do wanna deal. They've been
explicitly doing so and they've even agreed where
had they taken it, it would've been done.
Rather not even taken it. Technically, they're agreeing
should've been the end of it, but Israel
backed away every time. We're gonna get into
a second. So Netanyahu's literally trying to use
the murder of the people he allowed to
die to continue to allow more of them
to die.
It's very clear in the Israel conversation. They're
all screaming about it. They're literally, right now,
carrying out all sorts of,
labor protests and strikes because he did this,
because he doesn't take a deal.
And yet Netanyahu stands up and speaks to
the west and he goes, we're doing this
for you.
I mean, it's so incredible how the people
in the west can't see how clear that
is. It's the one that can't anyway. Maybe
it's nobody. I don't know. The group representing
the families of those held hostages in Gaza
has demanded
that Netanyahu, quote, address the nation and take
responsibility
for abandoning the hostages.
How can we even pretend
like it's on I mean, BBC
never even used to include stuff like this.
Now they're they're telling you point blank. They're
screaming, you're responsible, Netanyahu.
But here's what's funny. All of these childish
and feckless liars like Elon Levy
will take the protest,
take one quote of them going,
take you know, bring the hostages back. But
they're screaming at Netanyahu.
And then
stand in front of the west and say,
see? We're all in solidarity with the we're
all together in Israel, and we want you
to get the Hamas. Give them back. See?
We're all agreeing. He's done that, like, 3
different times. They're speaking to you, moron. They're
speaking to Israel. They're saying, you take a
deal. Bring them back. And they pretend.
And they're doing it for the interest of
the western audiences. Why? Because that's the central
role here. That's why they influence your politics.
That's why they control your elections. That's how
this is working. Now it says, quote, the
delay in signing the deal has led to
their deaths, they write, and those of many
other hostages. That or that's the family speaking.
The delay in the deal has led to
their deaths. So they're blaming Netanyahu no matter
what.
The group has also announced plans to, quote,
bring the nation to a halt.
That's for,
yesterday and into today. Asking the Israeli public
to join protests in Jerusalem, in Tel Aviv,
and elsewhere
it to call for the hostage exchange deal.
So as we speak, they're literally protesting and
picketing to get Israel to take the deal
that Israel tells us the West is stupid
for asking for, or that we shouldn't do,
or that we're racist for thinking the extent
while they're forcing them to do it.
I mean, it's just it's such a it's
in a way entertaining, but it's so macabre
and disgusting because people are dying.
Where was I? It says, one of Israel's
most prominent opposition politicians,
Lapid,
joins the call for a general strike to
put renewed pressure on the government to great
make a deal. Now to me, that's a
more opportunism. It's like the media in this
country suddenly telling the truth. He sees that
they're not gonna get this. He sees that
Netanyahu is being led by them, like,
just fanatical lunatics
who don't care about their own people, don't
care about the outcome. Who knows? So he's
going, well, screw it. We're gonna lean this
way and look like I'm the one on
the sane side even though end of the
day, they all want Palestinians dead, it seems.
It says he accused
Netanyahu's cabinet of death, is what he called
it, of deciding against
saving the hostages
to avoid conflict with his far right allies.
Well, look at that.
All these Republicans telling you that you're wrong
for supporting anything again, you know, hurt. That's
not a genocide. You're wrong. You're being played
by woke leftist and Muslim terrorists.
The Israeli
government
is telling
you that they avoided getting them home, which
allowed them to die, so he could appease
his lunatic far right cabinet.
It says, quote, he prefers saving the coalition,
which is what we keep telling you, with
Smotrich, Ben Gavir,
rather than saving our children's
lives. This blood is on their hands, says
mister Lappin.
Goes on to say,
Sharon Lipschitz,
whose father, Oded, is being held in Gaza.
So she's got a family member there right
now. Said the hostages were killed because of
delays in getting a deal.
Now that just means simply that however they
died, it's it's it's Netanyahu's fault.
But I actually wonder whether or not they
were actually killed because of them, and I'll
show you my points.
Now it says meanwhile, after the death of
mister Goldberg in Poland, an American citizen, I'll
make a point about that too,
not the first, whether if there's been plenty
in Gaza no one talks about, was confirmed.
US president Biden said he was devastated and
outraged.
Of course, because it's an Israeli
American.
It's not a joke. There there I mean,
there's been countless examples. I'll show them to
you. Not a peep from Biden about Americans
being killed in Gaza. Why? Because they're Palestinian
Americans. Even in some cases, they're just Americans,
but they're in Palestine.
Not by hostage, but they're because they live
there with somebody else. Nobody cares. They're suffering.
They're dying, getting houses stolen, getting raped and
tortured, getting nope. Doesn't matter. Only matters if
it's one we can use on a BBC
headline about hostages in Israel.
UK prime minister Keir Starmer expressed shock at
the horrific and senseless killing of 6 hostages
in Gaza. Let's think about this statement. You
mean, what about the 40 that Israel's killed
by bombing? What about the 100 or tens
of 1,000
of people that have been killed because of
Israel?
He doesn't express shock and horror
when a child dies every 10 minutes. Well,
we're gonna talk about children starving to death
while we're speaking.
It's almost like their lives don't matter.
Says quote, Hamas must release all the hostages
now. And a ceasefire deal must be agreed
on by all sides, he
says. Well, who are you talking to, bud?
You better be talking to Netanyahu because literally
everybody else is agreeing with you. Everybody. Everybody.
Hamas, the Israeli public. Other than, I guess,
republicans and Netanyahu, everybody is on the same
page.
But see, here's the point. It seems like
this entire charade is is aimed at the
political central this political spectrum in the America
in the United States and specific leadership in
the world.
How does that make sense? I mean, the
only way you can break that down is
that specifically the outcome of the American influence
of politics,
has that much of an influence over the
rest of what the world does. Why? Because
the US government is an authoritarian
control structure that is working against the interest
of countries all around the world with Israel,
the UK, and the rest of them. That's
the truth. So right now, they are desperately
trying to hold on to a a glimmer
of some kind of control over the narrative
in this country
while their own people burn things down in
the streets.
Try to make sense of that without recognizing
that they're everything is aimed at convincing you,
American, that you are supposed to blindly acquiesce.
That you're supposed to want digital IDs. You're
supposed to walk into the the technocratic control
structure, you want Maduro out of there, and
you want Israel controlling our congress. Right?
So what's going on? If you're paying attention,
it says more than 40,738
people have been killed in Gaza.
According
to The Lancet,
estimates are up upwards of a 186,000 when
all said and done.
It comes to a UN led, multi day,
polio vaccine campaign
following discovery of potentially deadly virus.
Right. So we're we're gonna talk about all
these different conversations. They're not gonna give in
any which way, but they're gonna break for
that. Same point. Obviously, that stands out as
something that does not make sense.
Very worried about that.
First infection more than 25 years. 33 in
fact. Good journalism.
I was being sarcastic in case you didn't
catch that. But so here's what I find
interesting. About the deal first. So there's 3
main points to make here. 1st is the
deal.
In general. And you know we have been
screaming about this since the the first week.
And this is kinda why this frustrates me.
And again, I guess, just the way things
work with the way we've reached. But, I
mean, I think we're at obvious point where
we can tell, as I'm making the point
earlier today, and it's not just Twitter. That
there is a very,
very clear control of information in the world.
And and platforms are a part of it.
Your governments are by at the end of
the day, my point is that it's so
frustrating that we can have a
conversation about this.
Whether it's whether it's this show or any
other clips or things that have gone that
have that have a lot of reach and
talked about this going all the way back
to the 1st week.
And this is what we pointed out. Remember?
I mean, I've seen major platforms make these
points, and they still don't go anywhere. That's
my point. Is that ultimately, the idea
that Hamas had already offered
complete exchanges of the hostages,
complete.
If only they would stop their what they're
doing in the strip. Not enter the Gaza
strip.
And Israel said no.
Over and over. I've shown I mean, we
we were showing this the 1st week. Remember?
And this was the point I'll show you
real quick.
This is this goes back to that 1st
week. This is from,
Canadian news
from 10 months ago.
Defeating Hamas is priority, everything else is secondary.
Now they've said that many times until they
started realizing that their own people were, like,
what did you just say?
So my point is, here's kim.com,
here is lord bibo, both going, woah, look
at this. Screenshot.
No. Neither of them giving you the source
material. Neither of them giving the article to
read for yourself. I guess my point in
first is just like it's frustrating that we
can have this point and be ins, and
yet it takes a screenshot a la Twitter
files for this to start being talked about.
How do we not see that as a
control flow of information? It's frustrating. Now, skipping
that, I'll include this headline for you.
Let's talk about the point of what that
screenshot they're sharing actually shows you in the
article it comes from. And this is from
April 26, 2024.
No doubt Netanyahu preventing hostage deal. Yeah. You
should know this by now, or I should
include this one too.
The Harrettes article about how Netanyahu is systematically
foiling talks to release hostages.
So many examples of everybody telling you that
it's all that. When all the people that
are on one side or the other because
they've chosen political teams or politics don't want
to acknowledge the facts.
But here's this one saying, no doubt he's
preventing the deal.
The point was
lost it. Here we go.
It says, the first official we met
oh, that's the wrong one.
Here.
It says, we later found out that Hamas,
and this is speaking from, who was this
again? An official
Where was it? It's not relevant actually, but
I think it's Galantor. The point is that
Singh was saying, we later found out that
Hamas had offered
on the 9th October
10th October
to release
all hostages
or civilian hostages in order for the IDF
not to enter the strip.
Now that was just 9th 10th. You read
this article,
that's the point of not just getting a
screenshot of something you can't verify, is that
you go on to recognize that there were
countless
examples.
Countless examples of different times they've offered more
agreements.
And every single time Israel shut it down
because at this time, nobody was paying attention.
They were the ones screaming, no. We're not
gonna do that. We're not gonna work with
terrorists.
But the point is the families wanted that,
but they didn't know this was happening. Because
what was Netanyahu saying publicly?
Hamas doesn't want a deal. The same thing
he's pretending now.
But they were lying.
And they're lying now.
As everybody everywhere other than some part of
our political spectrum and Netanyahu is telling us.
Twiled.
Systematically foiling the talks. And so what that
meant is that made sure those people never
left Gaza, which now they're dead. How do
you not blame that on them? As Salrad
points out, Israeli media is more critical of
Netanyahu than US media or the Biden administration.
I don't see these headlines in the US.
Hostage families tell prime minister to stop hiding
behind the IDF spokesperson, take responsibility for the
hostage deaths. Well, look at that.
Hostage families forums blames Netanyahu for deaths of
captives.
Was holding Philadelphia corridor worth the lives of
6 more hostages?
Because guess what? They're planning on holding that
corridor
indefinitely.
Like we said, like we predicted. They're illegally
occupying territory everywhere because that's what they do.
That's part of the Greater Israel Project.
Last one, hostage families forum Netanyahu abandoned the
hostages.
We're all lied to. Biden steps up and
says that they're working into a deal and
it's Hamas' fault. Right?
As I said, one of the reasons I
believe more are waking up than ever is
because of how clearly the power structures have
simply lost control of these narratives.
Everywhere.
Even the most willfully blind person can see
how obviously contradictory this story is. Yet they
just double down. Muhammad Shahada points this out.
Israeli media is near unanimously blaming Netanyahu.
This is right now. And Israel's government for
the death of those 6 hostages whose bodies
were found yesterday. And remember, the one even
before that, the Muslim hostage that they said
they found, it their own media proved that
they just randomly stumbled across him. Then they
they cobbled together this whole narrative of how
they this big operation where they saved him.
Their own media told us that they just
found him.
Western media didn't care. Just ran with the
narrative that Netanyahu cobbled together for them because,
clearly, there's some level of control there.
It's not a Jewish thing. It's a Zionist
Israeli government thing. Hopefully, that's clear by now.
But it says Israel media admits that Netanyahu
is the one refusing the deal.
Why it says, why is none of that
being reported in the United States? Really ask
yourself that. Not Fox, not CNN, not MSNBC,
not any of them. Not any of the
mainstream alternative media.
Then Yahoo, reverse.
Reverse. They're saying they're telling them to reverse.
Military pressure does not return abductees. It kills
them.
Yeah. Just like anybody with a brain's been
saying from the very beginning because you don't
know where they are and you're bombing in
the area. Duh. A
A dramatic change for the worst in abductees
chances for survival.
The state of Israel condemns them to death.
That's a direct quote.
You get it?
But we're all being lied to
by the very people who have an who
have,
might be capable of actually stopping this.
Now Robert's written about this more than 2
times. Here's the ones that I grabbed. May
7th, Hamas agreed to cease fire. Israel attacks
Rafa in response. Right? The very place that
they claimed these people were killed. So isn't
it possible they killed them right there? Yes.
Next one.
Israel once again refused his own cease fire
deal after Hamas accepts. Both times, it was
embarrassingly obvious to prove. Remember, Blinken both times
stood up and said, Hamas better take it.
Israel gave them everything. And then they stand
up and go, we accept. And Israel goes,
woah, never mind. You didn't do this or
that. Okay. Then somebody was misleading somebody because
Blinken said, we're all good. They accepted. What
do you say, Hamas? They said yes. And
all of a sudden everything changed. No. It
was obvious. They don't want this deal.
Or Netanyahu and his extremist maniacal cabinet doesn't
want this deal.
And by the way, it's be no it'd
be in my opinion anyway, it would be
no different if Trump was there or Kamala.
Now Ryan Grim says a scoop from Jeremy
scale Scahill. Drop site news.
International internal ceasefire documents show, as you, by
the way, should already know if you watch
this show or, you know, have a brain,
that talks ought to have effectively revolved on,
revolved on I think maybe resolved on October
2nd when Hamas accepted the deal,
which you already know.
The US has since allowed Netanyahu to undermine
the deal with the horrifying consequences we see.
Now the point was that the framework originally
with the UN kinda set, then they went
to discuss.
From that point forward, it's been very clear.
And, eventually, they got to a point where,
like I said, the last two times we
just pointed to where they essentially put something
out, thought thinking Hamas would say no, they
accept it. Now from that point forward,
the only thing that's changed is Netanyahu has
added things that are ridiculous. Like, we wanna
ceasefire, but we wanna keep doing this until
we kill we defeat Hamas.
So then you don't wanna ceasefire because they're
not they're not ceasefire with nobody.
So it's just a stupid game they're playing,
and they all know that. They're just straight
up dishonest people.
But he writes in here, at at the
time I mean, you know what? Frankly, you
know this stuff. They were the the the
game they played, the 3 phase thing, and
the the 3rd phase was the manipulation about
it. Every the Hamas point was, if we're
gonna go into this process and by phase
3 we have to hope they follow through,
we they keep telling you they're not gonna
follow through so we're not gonna take this
3 phase dynamic when they've admitted they're not
gonna do the last part which makes it
all point which would make it all pointless.
And then they go, oh, it doesn't want
it. Nope. The only thing that changed was
Israel adding something they knew would basically create
a situation where it would it's the same
thing with the Oslo Accords and whatever else
we've talked about. They've made sure that, ultimately,
it would fail because of what they wanted,
blaming Hamas the entire time as by design,
remember.
Here's the actual article, how the US enabled
Netanyahu to sabotage a god's ceasefire.
Arnab Batran writes, if you somehow still buy,
and it's the same article, if you somehow
still buy into the propaganda that that it
is Hamas,
not Israel, that's blocking a ceasefire deal, read
this piece.
As the article details,
if you draw a timeline for the negotiations
along the last 10 months, you will observe
a consistent pattern of the Israelis.
Each time we are near to a reach
agreement, either they commit new massacres or backtrack
from the deal and add new conditions. It
really is a shame, you know, and, like,
they're just good work. But it's a shame
that you guys couldn't have known this and
it couldn't have been a viral conversation
4 months ago, 3 months ago, when we
were covering this explicitly on the t on
TLAF.
So I'm telling you guys, there's it's I'm
I'm 1, demonstrating our value. If you were
following this platform, you'd know all this explicitly.
You could write a book about it by
now.
But at the same time, to demonstrate how
weird this control like, we're not a small
platform. We're not as influential as some of
these larger ones, but we are not small
by any means. And yet, it's no matter
how far ahead we are in a story,
no matter how much information or how well
it's put together, and how long it sits
there, it all it always takes somebody
else to repackage it, put it out in
a way that's usually half the story for
it to ever get acknowledged by some of
these larger conversations.
That's not by accident.
I just think that's important to always point
out. There's a very clear control there, and
I think it's always about not letting people
that are actually nonpartisan
and truly objective to be in any position
where they can influence the the 2 party
illusion. And I think that's why we got
so much pushback when we started something new.
Now as I said in this regard, they
by the way, this is a real picture
of a massive protest against Netanyahu and for
them to take whatever deal is being offered.
As the as war monitor puts the largest
demonstration since the beginning of the October 7th
forward part of the war. I said, if
you're
listening to western politicians,
most any of them, on most any topic,
you are likely being manipulated.
It's not I'm not trying to make a
joke. I genuinely believe that. And the point
is they're all screaming at you about how
Hamas is the one that won't take the
deal. You're being lied to.
It's plain as day.
Now, Mariam Zonzen from 972 magazine
speaks up on this to make sure you
know, 1, that they're all protesting
Netanyahu and the Israeli government. But, 2, the
sad part of this, that most of them
don't really care about Palestinians. That's not why
they're doing this.
Doctor Yara says, let's be very clear about
something.
The 100 of 1000 marching in Tel Aviv
that we just showed you, again, confirming that
is real, demanding a ceasefire deal,
and as well as the resignation of Netanyahu,
there's no misunderstanding that, are not, she says,
doing so in protest of the genocide. That's
important and sad.
They are doing so in protest of how
the genocide has been carried out.
No military victory and the hostage is still
not home. So they failed in the objectives.
Not that they care necessarily about all the
murdering of Palestinians. Now some of them do.
And it's not it's not a small group,
but it's not even remotely the majority.
I think that's important to note.
Now she writes this is correct, as one
of the journalists.
Israeli apathy to Palestinian suffering remains consistent, and
that's sad. That's by design. That's because of
Zionism and their long term
social engineering and straight up brainwashing of people
in Israel. Same thing US government does around
war, but they're both failing. I think that's
a sign of the times that we need
to see as a positive change.
Palestinian fa fatalities have not factored in to
their demands, sadly enough. That's worth knowing, though,
to recognize the full breadth of the problem.
Now here's what Horetz wrote. This is from
yesterday. After 6 bodies of Israeli hostages were
retrieved from Gaza, Netanyahu said that, quote, Hamas
refuses to negotiate. See how that works? You
realize he knows that nobody believes him. He
you realize he knows people are, like, banging
on his door as he's making this fake
statement.
Now those who murder hostages don't wanna deal,
he says.
These guys just don't care. So all that's
aimed at is you. Right now, you listening
likely as a republican. That's who he's trying
to get you out of sheer desperation to
believe what he's saying.
And ask yourself how in the world with
how clear the momentum is that people like
Biden, Trump, RFK, and Kamala all
lie to you about it.
He says and then Benny Gantz, by the
way, showing you the counterbalance,
right after that says, or rather in the
way they're writing it, it's time to replace
this total failure of a government. Go out
and protest. That's part of their government.
It's just It's so crazy how this is
all working out. And of course, he has
to get up and he apologizes for their
deaths.
Defends the occupation of an area that part
of which why they just continue to happen.
Apologize. He said, I ask your apology that
we did not succeed bringing them home. They
don't care. This didn't This went over like
What is the Oh, opposite. What's the term?
I don't know. Can't think of a good
analogy. It didn't go over well. And the
the point is because they don't believe this.
They've been try he they know and they're
accusing him of doing this for his own
benefit. So this did not work.
And CNN says, Israeli American hostage has died.
Funny how you get a major headline
about one of these people.
And Breanne Wu says, has died.
Interesting. As she says, if you're if you're
ever been upset when passive voice has been
used to minimize police violence,
you can surely manage some indignation when it's
used to run cover for terrorists.
Wow.
You'd think that they might be able to
recognize the shocking level of hypocrisy for someone
to say that and not acknowledge
every 1,000 the I mean, literally every article
since the begin since October 7th forward.
Palestinians
die
in a vent in Israel. It's like, what
do you mean? Did they just randomly die
from heart attacks? No. They were murdered by
Israel bombs. But it's it's like, I don't
even think these peep I think these people
are so so
disconnected.
There's more of time this this is somebody
who is speaking from the Israeli perspective.
Saying that
I'm angry they used a passive voice to
hide. What about the thousands of articles that
have done that forever? I don't even think
they recognize that.
Has died is accurate because we don't know
what happened.
But you see, Israel said they were murdered,
so we're supposed to take their word for
it that they're so used to that dynamic.
The point is that BBC, for example, will
write an article about how Gaza you know,
this child just was died
because of something that happened. And the the
point is the explicit evidence shows they were
killed by an Israeli airstrike. Even Israel takes
credit for it, but gives you Hamas narrative.
They were a pal human shield. Whatever. But
they that that is a passive voice. I
just find that to be insulting as hell.
That this is what you're I mean, really?
You have the nerve to come out and
say, I'm insulted by passive voice and frame
it as police violence? That's the focal point?
My god.
Now Aviva Clampas
comes out and says not a word from
amnesty.
Not a word from Human Rights Watch. Not
a word from Red Cross, which I don't
even know why Red Cross would be kinda
it's weird. But the point is Human Rights
Watch and Amnesty have spent endless amounts of
time over the last 10 months exposing how
you're murdering children, how you're starving people to
death, how you're raping people in prisons. So
maybe,
bear with me here, they just don't think
you're gonna tell the truth. But either way,
the point is not that they're ignoring, they're
simply going,
we don't know
yet. Because it just happened and the evidence
doesn't come out. Israel going, here's the fact
without anything other than a word means nothing.
That might as well be a blank statement
because of how many times you've lied.
Because they call themselves human rights organizations.
So all it is is you going after
the group that have clearly said you're a
genocidal maniac because they didn't screen the narrative
that you put out there with no facts.
Sounds like a logical thing to do.
Here she is doing that same thing. Fix
the headline for you, just literally doing what
people have been doing to her since the
beginning, or them as Zionists covering this whole
thing up. Israeli American hostage has died. Yeah.
Because that's all we know.
We don't know what actually happened. All we
know is Israel said things happened and you've
lied about damn near everything.
Senator John Fetterman. Again, so are we to
believe that Fetterman knows more than the media?
Knows more than what any like, so the
point I'm making is clearly Fetterman was going
they they said, Fetterman,
say this, man. And he said, yes. Here's
the thing.
Now you can argue that's just because he's
a moron. And I'm not talking about because
he got a stroke. I'm talking about because
he was a moron before that. I'm talk
or you could simply argue it's because he's
being paid by APAC to do that. Because
he is.
Doesn't really matter.
He comes out and says, they did this
and we owe that's their response. How in
the world do you know? Frankly, most of
these people in these positions are completely unaware
of what's going on in the real world,
but on top of that, nobody,
nobody other than what Israel is telling you
do we know what happened, but that's my
point. These are people in American positions of
power who are simply going, whatever Israel just
said.
That makes sense, right? To what he actually
does, but then what we understand. Well, here,
going back to June 9th.
Aviva Clampus tries to use the same thing
they're using now.
45 Americans were murdered on October 7th. 12
Americans were taken hostage. 8 okay. She cares
about Americans, apparently. Well, I said over 600
Americans are trapped in occupied Gaza.
It's true here's here's the m NPR article.
It's I've been talking about this from the
beginning. 600 Americans, some Palestinian Americans, some just
Americans, both of which matter, all of which
human life matters,
are trapped in Gaza.
Guess what though? Briefly, they talked about it.
Biden was saying, well, you know, we might
need to help them get out of the
board. Then then they just gave up on
it. Never mentioned it again. Many of which
have died. You don't see BBC headlines for
that. You don't see CNN single headline articles
about how one of these American Palestinians died.
I wonder why.
And some of which have been publicized, guys.
Some of which there's an American, I thought,
was from I think it was Chicago, who
was on a deathbed dying.
She was there because her family lives in
Gaza and she literally was dying in Gaza
because she didn't have medical treatment equipment she
needed. Nobody cared. They didn't even nobody even
talked about it. Not CNN, not Fox News.
Only some side Palestinian platforms covered it.
My point was, here are 600 Americans in
Gaza, many of whom are likely already dead.
The point is, you don't care about Americans,
or anyone for that matter, not even Israelis
or Jews. You only care about using all
of them to achieve your Zionist goals.
The truth.
Here she is again doing it today.
Or actually, I think it's the next one.
But anyway, here is
Oh, that's right. So, this point is about
Americans.
Right? So, I think Aviva's right here in
one of these next ones, I think. Maybe
not. Maybe I'll maybe I'll ruin it. The
point is, they're always they're all pointing at
the fact that here's an American.
I mean, is they just killed an American
in Gaza. Don't you care, Americans? Ask yourself
why all this is so focused on you.
But what's funny is they didn't care when
this American was killed was injured or his
sister was killed, who was also an the
point is
countless examples.
This is a child with an American passport
in Palestine.
I said, interesting how the US and Israeli
government only care about American citizens being bombed
or killed in Gaza when they're Israeli Americans.
Even if they were also killed by IDF
bombs.
Ryan Raspiani
always said, where's the Biden administration when the
Israeli warplanes bombed the home of this American
child?
Nobody cares. They still don't care. Funny how
that works.
I think you already know why. They don't
care about any of us.
They're just using the idea of an American
to get you outraged to think that Hamas
is your enemy.
Whether it is or not. It's about working
for Israel. That's the point.
Now here is an article from
February 2024.
Families of killed Palestinian Americans. Demand answers.
Did we hear about that? I mean, we've
gotta see an article about it. But do
we get the big discussion from Biden and
everybody else going, oh my god. These Americans
were killed by Israel.
No. We didn't. I I'm sure you can
piece that together on why.
Israel killed them with air strikes. That read
it for yourself. It's not up for debate.
Here,
CBS, this is from April 3, 2024.
Remember this one? World Central Kitchen names the
American Jacob,
flicking How do you say that? Flickinger?
As victim of Israeli airstrike.
That's not even up for debate. In fact,
they bombed 3 cars in a row to
make sure they killed them. And then called
it an accident, which we all know wasn't.
And by the way, just recently bombed their
their headquarters because it was all an accident
before apparently. Right?
That's what happened. In case you missed it,
they bombed the World Central Kitchen headquarters. It
just happened. Like, 3, 4 or maybe a
week ago. The point
is it's American. Not a Palestinian American, but
an American. Now we got a little bit
of coverage about how they accidentally hit this
thing, but nothing else after that. But does
that American life not matter?
American and Gaza feel Americans, in general, feel
abandoned by their government. This goes back to
October 27th. Same conversation. So those 600 Americans
and American Palestinians that were trapped,
nobody cared about them. They were saying, look.
We're through you're letting this happen. We're not
they're Israel's not letting us out.
So if there was ever a time where
Americans are supposed to be up in arms
about anybody protecting Amer that was the time.
And nobody said anything, other than people like
us.
Israel was bombing where they were, killing them
at will, and nobody seemed to care.
Pretty disgusting. Isn't it? Here's Washington Post from
October 12th. Going further back, few days after
October 7th. For American family trapped in Gaza
as bombs fall, there's no way out.
Guess we don't care about Americans, really. Just
care about what works for the American government,
which includes killing Americans.
Here,
January 23rd, 2024.
Nearly 2 dozen Americans have been killed in
Gaza Israel war, US says.
Hold on a minute.
It says,
as a result of the continued violence of
October 7th, we can confirm the death of
23 American citizens, 21,
who have served in the IDF.
Oh, okay.
Forgive me if I'm outraged at the fact
that in January of 2024,
the Washington Post, citing the US government, said
that only 20 only near 23 Americans.
But you know what they're only talking about?
The Israeli Americans because there's a hell of
a lot more than 23. There's 600 that
are probably all dead in Gaza. There was
multiple families that were telling you they were
trapped. I just went through all of them.
None of them are mentioned in this article.
So I guess we're not talking about Americans.
We're talking about Israeli Americans.
Ask yourself how it's possible the Washington Post,
the US government, and everybody else can write
about this and not consider that there are
other Americans than Israeli Americans.
That should scare you a little bit, quite
frankly.
Does me. That's horrifying.
I mean, there's no question that there's an
influence there. Ask I mean, you could put
connect those dots.
Now, Rami al Abdul posted this on September
1st.
Didn't see a headline for this guy.
2nd victim in 24 hours. The death of
Palestinian,
Arafat Al Khawaji Khawaja, has been announced at
the Sediemen military camp
due to torture by Israeli soldiers. So it's
like we all just gave up on that,
so we're focusing over here. Israel screams about
something that seems like they were involved with,
their own people tell you they're responsible for
and everything drops. We're not talking about the
rape prison that just got exposed for being
a rape prison and a guy just died
because of torture at that rape prison
and nothing.
Hey, CNN, Fox News, a Associated Press, Reuters.
Where you at?
Guess we don't care about them.
Surprise, surprise.
Tiberias says the people who murdered tens of
thousands of Palestinians,
including over 50 in the last 24 hours,
want you to support them killing even more
because they lost 6 of their own.
That they could have gotten back at any
time if they simply stopped killing Palestinians.
This is insane. I agree. That's Tiberias. He
says none of these people had to die.
None of them. Israel has prevented a ceasefire
and hostage deal since 2 days into this.
And it is not it is a it
is 1 year
next month.
That's incredible.
Caitlin Johnstone says that Israel has exponentially more
hostages than Hamas has. And murders them routinely.
And rapes and tortures them constantly.
That's not a hyperbolic statement, guys. It has
been I mean, it's unreal how much has
come out about this sense.
To their chagrin, of course, they're angry that
people are seeing it. But they literally just
spent weeks protesting to defend the rape of
prisoners.
And we're supposed to be outraged about what
they I mean, it's incredible as their own
people tell you they're responsible for this.
Ben Shapiro
has some wisdom to share with you. He
says the word evil
is not descriptive enough for Hamas.
They murdered in cold blood,
6 people.
They had taken hostage almost a year ago.
Again, remember, this has been my opinion, far
from verified. But even if they did just
kill these people, they took hostage. First of
all, we're talking about
military
captives.
Which doesn't make it any less of a
horrifying thing to see a person get killed,
but realizing that we're talking about a war
dynamic of an ongoing illegal occupation. And they've
been murdering, raping, and torturing people for 75
years. So they take these people hostage. And
there are these are
detainee POWs.
These are not civilians as much as they
push this idea. All of them are IDF
members.
And so my point is, I'm I'm of
the mind that this is something that Israel
did. And their own population is telling you
they're responsible.
And he goes on to make a case
about 6 people.
Cold blood.
And again, that while we're reading this, Israel
just starved children to death. Israel just probably
raped someone out of prison and just killed
more people in Gaza. And that's not an
issue for Ben Shapiro,
despite what the world seemed to think.
He says,
all in an attempt to sow seeds of
political chaos.
Oh, is that what they're doing?
Sowing seeds of political chaos or maybe just
trying to strive for their own independence? You
know, whatever. It's just a few points. Hamas
must be extirpated.
It is the only thing to do on
both a moral and practical ground. So the
whole conversation is about going back to the
idea that Netanyahu has to just keep going.
So that's your that's your answer. So your
the entirety of Israel population,
the the fat
the vast majority of them are screaming, deal,
deal, deal because you're killing our people.
You come in and go, we have to
keep going because of the people.
Yeah. That just pretty much makes you a
moron, Ben Shapiro, or a complete dishonest liar,
however you wanna look at it. Because if
you're telling them to keep going after Hamas,
and they're all telling you that because we
all know that's what's happening, going after them
is what's getting them killed,
And and they're not wanting you to do
that. The only people that want us to
keep going is you and Netanyahu apparently and
our government. Because you're genocidal maniacs? I don't
really know. It seems like that. He says,
no deal that leaves Hamas in place or
allows for the reharmacization,
some moron, of Gaza can have be more
morally justifiable.
Aside from which Hamas has rejected every deal.
You see my point? This guy is not
a journalist, guys. He is a propagandist,
a liar.
If you can pretend that Hamas rejects these
deals, he's either the worst. This guy can't
piece 2 dots together, can't break fast the
obvious lies of how clearly they've been deceiving
you, or he's knowingly deceiving you. There's really
only 2 ways to look at that. When
the world can recognize, including the entirety of
their conversation in Israel, that he has been
doing this, to systematically
foil the talks per the Israeli media, and
Ben Shapiro comes out and just blatantly lies
to you.
Please digest that. Recognize how dishonest this conversation
is,
and see that they've been doing it for
a long time.
He says the Biden White House spent months
delaying Israel's entry into Rafa.
Oh god. I mean, this guy is serious?
How is this possible that this guy is
in any way influencing people when this is
the kind of stuff he's putting out? It's
just narrative lies.
We all were talking about how the people
in the state department briefings, the white department,
White House briefings, were literally pushing back on
that. They're like, guys, this is they're going,
we need to wait for a serious operation.
Oh, yeah. Look at Rafa. It's completely destroyed.
God, this guy, how does anybody respect this
person? Including by withholding armaments.
Oh, you mean that one shipment they paused
but actually let through because that's what happened?
And then never stopped anything else?
I'm not making this up, guys. This is
so easy to prove. Ben Shapiro, clearly, for
whatever reason, like the rest of these maniacs,
has just completely committed to these lies.
I I mean, I don't know why it
should destroy his career. I don't think it
will with the way the world works, but
should because he's just blatantly lying to
you. And it says, if Biden administration hadn't
stood in the way of effective defense for
Hamas.
Wow. A tragic day for Israel and Americans.
Evil must not be fought. I mean, you
guys, you could this is embarrassing. Like, I'm
almost embar I'm embarrassed for him as much
as I think he's ridiculous. Omar Badar says,
the Israeli government murdered 16,000 children over the
past 10 months. They even raped and tortured
to death dozens of Palestinian hostages held without
charge.
Human rights groups have pointed this out. The
Israeli population just protested to say that's okay.
He says, who are a morally depraved dolt?
I think you are a morally depraved dolt
depraved dolt with bigotry driven selective outrage. I
that's well said.
It's unreal to me. In any case,
here's what Avi Maier, the, what was he
again? He's the former editor in chief of
Jerusalem Post.
He says all 6 Israeli hostages whose bodies
were recovered from Gaza yesterday have been shot
in the head, were executed.
Well, what's strange to me is I don't
see that anywhere.
Not in any of the coverage of this
talking. And most of them are simply saying
they died. Could
they I don't trust the corporate media, so
who knows? But that could be the point
is that the only thing saying that is
the former editor of the Jerusalem Post and
the Israeli media and the rally gov Israeli
government
seems suspicious.
From an for an obvious reason. Now Jerusalem's
Jerusalem Center For Foreign Affairs says, but CNN
and m b and I'm kinda can't talk
right now. But CNN and n m and
NBC only said they died, which is what
I said a second ago. LT says it
was the statement of the Goldberg Poland family
that they were quoting,
which referred to his death and not his
murder.
So I'm beginning to sense that the even
the families, which I think makes sense since
they're the ones talking to the ones coming
home, who are telling you the government's lying.
That have a different view on this.
Who may may not they may question that
he
anything they're being told. Don't forget, there's even
the example of the of the kid who
died because of gas. That Israel gassed.
The mom came out and exposed that story.
I think Grey zone broke that down. She
said, you killed my son using t probably
the tear gas they pretend isn't deadly.
And they eventually admitted that. That's one of
the many hostages that they killed.
War monitor points out, in his opinion, that
they were killed by Israeli soldiers who were
trying to rescue them, which is, by the
way, I'll show you next, happens
more times than not.
They were all Israeli soldiers, which is easy
to prove. There that means they're detainees, POWs.
Hamas has previously order offered as per the
Israeli media to release all of them, which
we just showed you.
Here is July 22nd. Israeli army itself, and
you and it does it has the source
material to their own report from Jerusalem Post.
Israeli army admits
troops likely killed
2 captives held in Gaza.
Now that's When they admit that, you can
almost be guaranteed that that's a hell of
a lot more. This is their admit to
try to make it seem like something's being
honest about the bottom line. They've killed a
lot of them. That's what the hostages coming
home have told us.
This one you've already seen.
This I I'll explain again in case you
haven't seen it. Blowed my mind.
This this is 3 hostages that escaped or
whatever ultimately happened. We don't know because they
were shot by IDF.
But they, were told they were us escaped.
Now 2 of them well, 3 of them
ran up and say, you know, where's really
hostages? They had a piece of cloth with
SOS written on it with food
or whatever SOS in Hebrew, whatever.
Immediately, they shot 2 of them. Now these
guys do not look like Palestinians.
Now then, one of them ran away.
Hit behind a corner saying, I'm a Israeli.
Don't shoot me in Hebrew.
And as the article writes, 15 minutes went
by, or I think it was even 20
minutes. He came back out around the corner,
and they shot him. 2 of them shot
him.
That's Hannibal directive, guys. It takes a special
kind of stupid to pretend that's not exactly
what that looks like. Either they have so
little control over their people, which very well
may be part of it, or they I
mean, I it's clear to me. They have
been killing their own people in every possible
turn, starting October 7th. And they've even admitted
they ordered Hannibal directive.
So and then here's the example of Noah
Arghamani, who we just told you. She reported,
and you could link it to this is
from Common Dreams.
Source material's in there. She publicly spoke out
about this. Slamming Israeli media lies.
Saying that it was the IDF strike, not
Hamas, that hurt her, that wounded her while
she was there. And they all lied about
it. Now that is not new as well.
We've talked about this from from forever,
since the very beginning of people coming back.
Freed Israeli hostages held by Hamas were terrified
by the IDF air strikes that would kill
them. More, they said, than the Hamas possible
of Hamas possibly hurting them. We even wrote
an article about it. Free Israeli captives admitted
they had more fear of the IDF bombs
than they did of Hamas.
The the do you see an Israeli protester?
BB, the destroyer of Israel.
On the record,
They're they're coming out going, we were terrified
of I mean, and and remember, Noah Arghamani
even said the Hamas member shielded her with
his body.
Sure sounds like what they wanna frame it
as. Right? Go ask Ben Shapiro. He probably
raped her while he did it. Right? Just
add some narrative to it. It's not the
truth though,
as she will tell you.
Now here is the example, Furkan shares this
about how many they've killed. And this we've
been talking about this from the very beginning.
It's exactly what it looks like. Now my
my point is these 4 that they supposedly
rescued, I don't think that this was a
I mean, I forget what the exact dynamic
was of these 2. But remember, some of
these were by accident. The one that just
claimed they rescued the the Hebrew guy, that
was they've stumbled across him.
But the bottom line is they have bombed
or killed according to the other hostages or
Hamas in in in in,
conjunction with them,
which have ever you have every right to
doubt. They could be lying. My point is
that the other hostages that have come out
have backed up what they've said and have
come it's all been true. And the videos
that they've said while they were there, they've
come out and they've admitted the same thing.
So the point is it seems more likely
than anything. They're continuing to tell the truth.
But the point is that they have been
killed by IDF bombs according to their own
hostages or rather mostly
POWs detainees.
So if their record is 4 while they've
killed 41
and 50,000
plus innocent people in Gaza, then clearly it's
not about the hostages.
Now here I'll include this tweet from BM,
which really it's just this is from
this account which I'm not familiar with that
is simply arguing that the Palestinian resistance is
saying that should they have come in, that
they made this public, that ultimately they would
shoot them. So my point was simply to
add that however you wanna look at this,
no matter how you wanna spin this,
either they did this knowing they were gonna
be killed or they used their bodies, they
lied about it from the beginning. The point
is that Israel is responsible, even according to
their own population, even if it was that
pow that Hamas shot them. Because they told
them, look, they wanted to give them back
and you wouldn't take them.
There's really no way to else to look
at it, in my opinion.
Now Avi Mayer, the former,
editor also says that if you posted all
eyes on Rafa, you have nothing to say
about the 6 Israeli hostages that they found
in Rafa.
Sure seems a little convenient to me.
Certainly possible. But according to literally every one
of the ones that came out, that's not
actually what was happening. But, I guess, we'll
just go along with the Israeli narrative because
that seems to have worked out so far.
Muhammad Shigada says, what are you talking about?
Every single one of them would have been
alive and released if Israel didn't go into
Rapha. Remember? Because that was the whole point.
Had they not invaded Rapha, the ceasefire deal
would have been happening. Because they invaded Rapha
instead of taking that deal.
It's so amazing how they contort this all.
Right? So they there was a deal. Hama
Israel said, no. We don't accept it even
though Hamas accepted what Israel put forward.
Then they invaded Rapha. Now they're blaming that
on the fact that they died, even though
they're the ones that didn't take the deal.
You see how dumb that is? He's right.
He says, how many living hostages were rescued
by the IDF going into Rafa and wiping
it out?
1.
And that was seemingly by accident.
And he was found.
So they went in and killed all these
people.
Including these ones to rescue one that they
accidentally found. I don't think they actually wanted
to rescue him.
Very easy to prove. Same thing here. He's
who Halil Fluid says, ruff Rapha has turned
out to be the place where they held
them. Why? Because they said so?
Mindless follower.
Remember how the US pressured up to go
in there? All eyes on Rafa. Right? Who
knows how many lives could've been saved? Same
stupid point. We do know how many because
if you would've done it, they would've survived.
So you killed them. Period.
And of course, Kamala Harris warns of consequences
of going to Rafa. There right now, there's
this desperate push to make Kamala look like
the one that's sort of not on Israel's
side, despite them blindly supporting everything Israel. Like,
she asked someone on her campaign that supposedly
said Zionists were bad, or I guess she
did. And now they're making her out to
be the anti semite. Isn't it funny how
that shifts?
30 seconds ago, Trump was the anti semite
because it worked for the narrative and now
it's switching back and forth. No. They're all
the same. It's all the same game.
Now here's the pushback.
Trita Parsi points out that Israelis are going
on strike. Now this is happening today.
To force Netanyahu to take the deal that
he's pretending that only racist wanted to take.
If Biden hadn't been so diff differential on
Netanyahu and enforced a ceasefire
deal, all of them would be alive. See
how different that is, you know, an an
a fact based narrative than all these screaming
Zionists telling you that you killed them all
because you didn't stop. I mean, I don't
even know how you say that without sounding
dumb. They chose not to take a deal,
then they went to the Roth to hide
it, they killed people while doing it, and
it's all our fault for not
what? Standing I don't even yeah. I don't
even know how to say that. The deal
was offered. We were on that side. You
didn't take it. You killed them. Now that's
our fault somehow. It's like, who knows? They
can make up whatever narrative they want.
The point is that, also, they're going to
be protesting from the union side of this,
the trade union, which I guarantee, with already
struggling economy, is going to really hurt what's
going on. With families of hostages behind him.
This is Maryov from 972 magazine. Announcing the
shutdown of the Israeli economy.
This is going to destroy what's already a
failing issue.
He says the most important thing is to
reach a deal.
Israeli
Israelis
strike and protest to demand a hostage deal.
This is happening as of the second. It's
going on right now.
Now Daniel Lemontis points out that Smotrich, of
course, you know, the patriot that he is,
accuses all of them of being terrorists.
They're all criminals now.
That's what he does. That's what your government
does. Right? You don't like what they know?
You're a terrorist.
You're a criminal.
This I wonder where they get the same
talking points from. The bottom line is that
he's saying you protesting water democracy because we
don't like what you're fighting for is illegal.
That's it. There's no law to it. There's
no logic. This guy does what he wants
because these are authoritarian
controllers.
Now Maryav is showing you what they're doing
to these people. Now this is technically before
the one going on today, but they have
been protesting for a long time.
And these people are getting now this one
is showing you there's right wing Israelis, the
blind supporters of Netanyahu's cabinet.
Some of them armed, by the way, who
are harassing and assaulting
Jews.
Funny how that works out. Israelis protesting for
the hostage deal.
Ah, so it's not about Jews. It's about
Zionism. Because here are Zionists who are
protesting or or or attacking
other Israeli Jews who want them to not
let their people die. Now you could argue
they're all Zionists, quite frankly. But the point
is, that in any case, when you push
back against the Zionist agenda, you are now
the pariah.
Whether you're a Jew or not. Right? There
are plenty of Ethiopian Jews in the country
that get treated like they don't matter. This
game where they pretend like it's all about
the Jews and they're supporting of them in
their plight, they're lying to you. There are
Jewish people around the world who are calling
out Zionism today more than ever because they're
lying to you.
But he says, well, cops are standing idly
by. Showing you, he says, this is a
copy and paste of how it looks when
settlers attack Palestinians. And soldiers just look on.
All these truths coming out left and right
because they are falling apart. Rightly so, because
it's an authoritarian apartheid regime.
And here
is what's happening to some of these people
protesting,
running over them. Israeli police ran over this
and guess what? This is the craziest part
to me. This is the sister of 1
of the hostages.
Here's Israel running over 1 of the hot
sisters of a hostage with a police horse.
Clearly, they care about them. Right? Happened in
the United States too. Remember? Ran over that
old one with a horse? They don't care.
Was that the UK? I forget.
Pretty clearly, they don't care about Israeli Jews
exclusively. Sorry. She's screaming there for the podcast.
It's just so gross how obvious this is.
Here they are spraying with whatever that foamy,
disgusting water is because trust me, it's not
normal. It's usually Israel's using the stink water
or whatever else they call it. Yeah. Skunk
water. That's what they're using. Guys, this stuff
is apparently so on so disgusting that you
almost can never get it off you. And
that it some people get sick and get
it get ill from this stuff. Like, literally
infections and whatever. Like, apparently they dump some
of the stuff in here. Like, I'm reading
this from people that have been talking about
this over the years.
It's not healthy for you. It is like
some disgusting concoction of very dangerous things. And
they spray this on people they want to
move.
These
are Israeli Jews
protesting for Netanyahu to take a deal that
he wants the west to think that only
racists wanted to take.
There they are, spraying them down. Here's another
angle.
Look at all this.
Oh, it's like coating their bodies.
Why is anybody in the world okay with
this stuff? These people are horrifying.
I'm talking about the Israeli government.
Why it read, tens of thousands protest as
they spray them with whatever that horrifying stuff
is. Israel forces are responding with stun grenades
as well. Israel Israel has been at war
with its neighbors since inception. Now it appears
to be at war with itself.
Foucron, this is where I got this image
from today. Netanyahu worried about protests as 280,000
rally in Tel Aviv against the government.
Israeli finance minister threatens to block labor strike,
which is happening today.
Police clash with the demonstrations in Israel, more
than 20 people arrested.
Literally, this guy has blood on his hands.
This guy these people are making statements about
how the Israeli government is responsible for killing
these people.
And all you government all your governments wanna
tell you is that you're wrong for not
supporting Israel blindly. Well, we are supporting Israel.
We're supporting the people of Israel.
I mean, in in so far as they
want this to stop in the moment. Again,
I'm not anyone supporting that this Palestinian suffering
should continue is not on any not on
our side. Now in regard to the suffering
of the starvation, they're creating
in general, but the deal continues.
Or rather than not not reaching a deal
allows to continue.
The starvation.
Tiberias points out, on top of that, that
they're targeting aid still to this very day.
It's funny how these conversations ebb and flow,
but these things never stop.
You realize they've never stopped targeting aid. They've
been stealing aid. They've been hurt they've been
shooting people that try to get aid.
People have been dying from air drops. And
this stuff happens every day.
Israeli military launches strike on a humanitarian aid
convoy. Remember when that was a huge story?
What happens constantly?
And, yes, they kill people. Tiberias says literally
every single time Israel commits a war crime,
they just blame somebody else. Here's the article.
IDF claims armed assailants tried to hijack the
vehicle, leading the convoy. Oh, really? You mean
the medical supplies that you keep refusing to
bring in? But the one time you tried,
oh, man. They came and stopped us. We
had to shoot everybody. Turns out that everybody
was a bunch of innocent civilians trying to
get what they needed. Right? Every single time.
It's not my opinion. It I mean, this
has been reported on. This one we've talked
about, the flower massacre.
That was, in my I mean, not I
could in my opinion, to be objective, but
the the facts were on the it was
all very easy to prove. Even the corporate
media called them out. They shot innocent people
just trying to get food. Caused a riot,
and then blamed them for not wanting to
get shot at.
And they drove over them with the trucks.
They literally set these people up to justify
shooting them because they were starving.
That's what you're that's the government you're supporting
if you support what the Israel's doing right
now.
Don points out the Israeli military launched a
fatal airstrike on a coordinated humanitarian aid convoy.
It's just Tuesday in Israel.
Organized by and this is specifically,
Ineera,
an American Near East refugee help group. And
it says, unconfirmed reports from Gaza said 5
people were killed.
It says, the attack occurred hours after Israeli
soldiers opened fire
on a World Food Program vehicle.
So 2 times in in twice in a
day, they fire on a World Food Program
vehicle, which by the way is right here.
And then they o air strike an 8
convoy. Whoopsie.
I guess we just confused you for Hamas.
It's what they're doing. It's what they're saying.
Here's what Owen Jones says. I bet Israel's
absolutely devastated that the World Food Programme has
suspended aid to Gaza's food deprived population after
Israeli forces accidentally fired on it.
Because that's what happens.
They're not gonna risk their people's lives when
they know Israel's gonna just shoot at them,
and they do it on purpose. And they
go, whoops. We missed we mistake.
We thought we were aiming over there. And
it doesn't matter. They do it every time.
And they know that. They know Israel's lying.
Everybody that's the thing. Everyone knows. Everybody everywhere
knows. It's only people in power structures that
are trying to keep this going.
Cabs of Gaza reports as of yesterday.
Another starving child.
Weighing less than 10 kilograms, little Gaza child
fights sickness and malnutrition
with his withering body.
This is, hardest part for me.
It just kills me. These kids are literally
starving to death in front of us, and
our government wants to act like you're the
problem.
These people need these people deserve to suffer.
Like, I I mean, it's like the the
people that are doing this.
Then it might the the problem is that
from a
from a humanitarian perspective,
Like, just the reflexive point of saying, like,
these people deserve to experience what they're dealing
with. But at the end of the day,
that can't be who we are.
We cannot be the kind of person that
goes do it back to them because then
you're just like they are. Despite the fact
that they clearly deserve it.
That's important.
We need to be better than them.
You know, actually have morals and principles. And
you can apply that to any conversation we're
talking about. The sad reality though is they're
doing this. So at the very least, they
deserve to be held accountable for it.
That doesn't seem to be happening.
I'll include this again from the United Nations,
showing you
how they've just systematically starved them from the
very beginning.
About, you know, a month about 3 weeks
of just basically nothing which kicked off the
the famine. And then pretended it trickled it
up, but ultimately never ever reached the amount
that was necessary.
The amount that was happening before, 500 plus
trucks a day.
And then trickled it down to near nothing.
I mean, it's it's and or by the
way, read these 2. Read all of these
when you get into the break the break.
This is the like the water, for example.
I mean, all the lies they tell you
about breaking this stuff down, you can read
this and it blows my mind how obvious
it is that they've completely,
deliberately shut down water systems. They've attacked the
nutrition, education, everything.
But then again, you know, UN is Hamas,
so let's just ignore it. Right?
Now here is Nora Erakat discussing the humanitarian
situation.
As BBC kind of wants her to address
it like some kind of a natural disaster.
Right. Well, precisely because housing
has been targeted, Israel has targeted
almost 90% of excuse me, 70% of residential
housing causing nearly the displacement of 90% of
the Palestinian population
of 2,000,000 people. Just last week, they received
5 evacuation
orders to go to places where there is
no quarter. There's been 16 evacuation orders just
in the month of August where people have
no place to go. They have been concentrated
into an area where no where there is
no infrastructure to sustain civilian life in a
bid either to remove them altogether
or to compel
Hamas to surrender. The targeting of civilians in
order to exact these political concessions
is textbook terrorism,
and we are allowing it to continue
rather than
right now what the US should be doing,
which is not just putting tremendous pressure on
Israel, but as the provider, the proviso of
arms transfers and its impunity within these international
multilateral institutions
has the lever to actually stop this right
now. They can continue negotiations over the details
over what happens, but there is no circumstance
where genocide
and and this military campaign of targeting civilians
and civilian infrastructure
should be permitted to continue. We're on a
daily be clear, just to be clear about
what the IDF says and what Israel says,
it does not target
You gotta love that. You literally had to
cut her off. He'd be like, just to
be clear, Israel denies that.
Well, of course they do. I mean, it's
it's ridiculous. Did you think do you think
South Africa was like, yeah. You got us.
Right?
Rwanda, Bosnia. Yeah. Yeah. You got us. We
did it. And by the way, weirdly enough,
Israel's involved with all every single one of
those. Rwanda, Bosnia,
and South Africa. What a weird coincidence.
Easy to look up.
It's really crazy to me though that they
just you know, that that shows you. There's
a clear agenda right there. Here is
clip news pointing out leaked diplomatic cables we
obtained show USAID
warning Biden
that the Israeli military has, quote, drastically increased
the pace of evacuation orders.
So they came out and said, look. This
is problematic, obviously. So that like we told
you the other day, there was 14 different
times, 12 different times in a week. Like,
they're just like, twice a day sometimes.
Moving them from location to location, no water,
no food, people suffering, people starving.
It's literal torture. Like, you show videos of
them laughing as they do this.
The point,
USAID actually reached out and said, this is
a problem.
They didn't care.
That's the overarching point here. They knew it
was happening. They knew it was being done
to do to torture them, and they they
didn't care. Or at least they didn't say
anything about it. Here is,
n NPR
from August 29th. US urges major changes to
Israel's evacuations in Gaza, a leaked memo says.
Now, they they said,
urge them, don't do the thing that is
designed to kill them,
and then did nothing.
That's the that's US for you right there.
Apparently, what that shows you is the US
government is well aware that there is no
for whatever blackmail, whatever control there is, whatever
it is that allows them to be able
to not listen despite the fact that they're
the ones supplying all the weapons.
From Israel's perspective, who knows what it is?
I can give plenty of examples. The point
is that the US just goes, don't please,
that might hurt them more and make us
look bad. And Israel goes, shut up.
And they don't do anything.
Please, we'll sanction the West Bank rapers because
they were starting to burn people alive. No,
Smotrich says. They go, okay, never mind.
That's what happened. We'll pause that shipment because
you're killing children. Don't do it. Okay. We
won't.
Every time. That's I'm I'm not making any
of that up. It's exactly what happened. Despite
Ben Shapiro's meek childish lies.
This is absurd that we can see them
say don't do that because you know that
it's going to cause them to die because
they don't have food, because they're already suffering,
and Israel just disregards.
So what that shows you more than anything
is not only are they complicit,
they're just feckless.
That they're allowing it to happen, knowing it,
and they're either too weak or too compromised
to do anything about it, or they don't
care.
But here we are, another corporate article proving
what's happening, and we're all going, maybe it's
not a joke. Maybe we should, you know,
not all of us, but some of us,
quibbling about how it might not be what
it looks like. Maybe Israel's actually fighting terrorism.
It's everywhere.
It's in your face. It's slapping you in
the cheek right now. Asal Rad points out
Israeli foreign minister says they must deal with
the West Bank like Gaza and calls for
temporary evacuations.
Yeah. Here we go. Who didn't see this
coming?
Where's Jordan? Didn't they say this would be
war if this happened? I haven't heard them
screaming about it. I haven't heard them speak
up about that. The bottom line is Israel
is now shifting into the West Bank as
we already told you. It's already happening.
They are now beginning to evacuate,
which simply is mass displacement from all these
areas.
We'll come back to this again as we
end, but, really, we just talked about this.
Israel invades the West Bank. They are raping
and torturing and murdering and burning houses down
and tearing up the streets. Literally, all that's
happening.
And
that's not a
red line.
The West Bank, which is supposed to be
part of Israel that you literally just marched
into. No. These are all still occupied territories
before this, but they physically marched in there
and started moving people from homes, tearing up
streets, burning things down.
The world just lets it happen.
I mean, apparently, there is no red line.
It says it was never about Hamas, it's
about occupation.
Ethnic cleansing.
Muhammad Sheihada points out, Israel keeps claiming
they're setting a gold standard for urban warfare
because they issue evacuation orders to warn civilians
about the areas, some of that lie from
the very beginning even though we showed you
that they deliberately
put they threw
contradictory
leaflets from the airplanes, told them to go
to an area that they then bomb that
day, and then claimed it was the other
one. Like, this is all psychological war, really
psychological torture.
Because they don't have to do this, they
can just bomb them. They're doing this to
literally torture these people.
Israel's I remember, even Israel wrote an article
about how they were allowing some level of
things on the ground because well, they needed
to get some steam out from October 7th.
Well, okay then. There you go. They're literally
letting them torture people everyday. They've admitted to
it. Now I think we already know this.
Israel's own channel 12 admits this is blatantly
false,
that they're setting a gold standard.
Evacuation orders are all about psychological
torture and collective punishment.
Rather than anything to do with policing civilians,
protecting civilians, which by the way again Israeli
media is telling you. Israel says Gazan's fine
displacement is a 1,000 times worse than the
war,
and that's precisely why the IDF toys with
civilians like ping pong and chess pieces to
burn them out. Every time Hamas attacks the
IDF from an area, Israel collectively punishes the
entire city with mass evacuation orders, just like
they've done the entire time they've existed, which
means that more than 84% of the entire
Gaza Strip is under such orders.
It's exactly what's happening. And Khan Yunus, as
soon as Hamas fired primitive projectiles,
Israel forced 250,000
people to flee to nowhere, indiscriminately shelling at
the city as well as where they were,
where they're going, and where they where they
went to.
But at zero intention of conducting any military
operations
that necessitate the evacuation.
This is coming from channel 12, Israeli media.
In Northern Gaza, Israel's most watched TV channel
says the IDF uses evacuation orders as psychological
warfare to pressure populations in Hamas. We just
reported this, 2 shows ago, I think.
The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially
against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims
is the literal definition of terrorism.
Here's the article.
Please
read it for yourself.
Now here, I'm thinking
man, we went longer than I thought today.
In general, I'll include this, so it played
this and then we see where I'm gonna
wrap up. So this is just the I
wanna go over some of the West Bank
stuff in general,
but I'll play this clip we just played
the other day and I'll map out where
we're gonna finish here. But this is a
CBS report,
Corporate media.
In fact,
I'll play this one first, which is used
in my opening.
There's so many of these guys. I think
this is what, the 5th or 6th one.
Actually, this is an American. American Jewish military
person who's telling you what they're doing.
There's been IDF, left and right, breaking off,
telling you we're killing people, we know it.
Happens been By the way, they've been doing
that for a long time.
You know, basically leaving the IDF and being
a whistleblower and telling you what's going on.
It's all over the place.
Damn it. Hold on.
I might have deleted it I guess. I
pretty was pretty certain I had that in
here.
I guess not.
So it's the video that I play just
the opening clip. I'll just play this one
first then.
Israel's response to October 7th troubled former army
major Do you think that you witnessed
war crimes taking place?
Probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're
bound to kill people that are not.
Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he
says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say? There
are no uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
7th trouble
Israel's response to October 7th troubled former army
major Harrison Mann from the start. They were
dropping 6,000 bombs a day. They were
Well, let me address something in the chat
real quick. So just so we're all on
the same page, guys.
All of Israel is Palestine.
I don't even know why that should be
up for dispute. Someone in the chat was
talking about West Bank. So we're clear, Gaza
and the West Bank, and
ultimately, the entire part was supposed to be
well, well, much more than it is today.
Part of the 2 state solution conversation, 67
forward.
Now, ultimately, Israel's continued. They boxed off all
of Gaza in 2006,
open air prison forward, anyway. And then West
Bank has been considered part of Israel proper.
Right? So Gaza is the open air prison.
West Bank, which is still essentially a controlled
occupied Palestinian area, even within Israel proper, there's
separate areas, separate water, separate everything. It's disgusting.
But it's still technically part of Israel and
the proper but not in reality, it's all
Palestine.
Hopefully, that makes sense. But we have to
realize that those two things are separate. Like,
that that's important to recognize. West Bank, despite
there being endless amounts of checkpoints, are still
technically part like most the people that have
Israeli citizenship and vice versa and go through
there, Gaza is
fucking not allowed. It's it's a that's why
it's important to recognize that it's in a
prison. They're trapped in there. They won't even
let them go out certain certain ways in
the in like, to fish. They'll shoot at
you. So that's the difference.
Burning through munition. October 7th, troubled former army
major Harrison Mann from the start. They were
dropping 6,000 bombs a day. They were
burning through munitions. Exhausting their supply. You know,
it was very easy to link
our support, which I was part of,
to
the the killing in Gaza. What bothered this
intelligence officer specializing in the Middle East the
most? His view that the Israelis were targeting
Palestinian civilians
indiscriminately
and that US weapons made it possible. Were
the Israelis
using American weapons
against civilians in Gaza?
I can say
almost certainly yes, but were they doing so
intentionally?
I don't know how you kill
35,000 civilians by accident.
Israel insists it's doing its best to limit
civilian casualties
and that Hamas uses civilians
as human shields, but that wasn't enough. Weeks
later, Mann resigned,
later explaining in a letter. At some point,
whatever the justification,
you're either advancing a policy that enables the
mass starvation of children
or you're not. You felt your work was
directly connected
to starving children.
Yes. There's gonna be times when there's members,
that that have different views. Certainly, you're right
to to go ahead and and get out,
and I'll just leave it at that. I
decided I would resign. More than a half
dozen government officials have publicly resigned
to protest US support for Israel's war.
Man is the first from the military,
the first from the intelligence community, and the
first who's Jewish. I think it's important to
understand just this is from a security
perspective.
Israel is not under existential threat. And what
do you say
to
American Jews who would say to you, what
are you talking about? If you are somebody
who
is really motivated by the concern to protect
Jewish life, you should be fighting for
them to conduct it in a way that
does not turn basically the whole world against
them. The great I mean, think about, as
always, what does Ben Shapiro call this man?
The same thing he called all the Jewish
voices for peace in that protest. Trash.
So is it about Judaism or is it
about Zionism?
Are you suddenly no longer a Jew because
you don't support the Zionist agenda?
I mean, we have to ask ourselves these
things. You can't keep pretending people are racist
when you can clearly show people like myself
literally, like,
symbolically walking hand in hand with all of
these Jewish people that are literally calling out
Zionism.
Right? It it it it best you can
say that we're against Zionism because clearly it's
not about Jewish people. I mean, the point
is there will be always racist overlaps in
any conversation.
As always, we could point out there's far
more Christian Zionists today that are simply Christians
that are Zionists, not Christians that believe in
Zionism or support Zionism rather. Christian Zionists. Then
there are Jewish Zionists, and that has to
matter for the conversation. So these people like
Ben Shapiro that are just desperate to scream
and screech about this racism, anywhere somebody calls
out this problem, it needs to show you
how vulnerable that problem is. Same thing I'm
saying about the 2 party illusion. These pea
these things are starting to I think the
timing of those two things coming down together
is not an accident.
Grandson of Jews who fled the anti semitism
of Eastern Europe
knows his stance will create some harsh blowback.
I didn't really feel like I had that
much of a choice. But he feels the
only way to influence US policy is to
no longer assist those who make it. He
said he no no longer had a choice
because he has principles.
He has morals. He did not want to
just go along and, you know, maybe the
lesser of evil. Right? No. He wanted to
do what he thought was right.
Gotta respect that.
Gavin,
Nascimento,
there's a great breakdown here that I think
you should watch. Thank you for Nicholas for
sharing this with me. I put together 50
former IDF soldiers detailing what's really going on
beyond all the BS and propaganda.
Testimony as follows. Brainwashing soldiers to hate, targeting
and terrorizing Palestinian civilians, Israeli settlers, insane behavior,
and apartheid policies.
It's 30 minutes long.
Worth the time because it is exactly what
we're talking about. Now, very quickly in general,
I'll play one more video as we or
2 technically, and then the last one is
on the way out. I'll include this link
again just because we're talking about this today.
By the way, anywhere.
I mean, literally anywhere. I was gonna include
it today, but just I pulled it for
time, which I guess would've taken half a
second to include.
Anywhere I post this, and then right now
there's at least 5 or 6 5 or
6 examples on Twitter right now. Twitter puts
this warning on it. Every time. Now really
it's this video, and you know why. Right?
I'll just play the beginning again. You know
why Israel and Twitter and Israel through Twitter
doesn't want this to be shown, and it's
suppressed literally every time
because it is very, very impactful. When were
you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 chill And the point is,
this is a Jewish doctor who gets choked
up, talking about children being shredded and smashed
and, like, it's it's horrifying.
It's very horrifying.
So the point is that when you play
this and, by the way, just saying those
things is not the point in regard to
this appeal warning. And I appealed all of
them. They don't care. I never get a
response.
When you read about what this may be
done for, it's about graphic content. It's about
sexual content, violence.
Not him talking about what Palestinians are doing.
Because you realize all the rest of these
do the same. Every one of these other
videos below with 4 other doctors doing the
same thing. Those don't get flagged. Why is
that?
Somebody in the conversation, the CHEQ Israeli bi
who knows what it is? Somebody's influencing Twitter's
a platform to put a warning on this
video
every single time. And even if I appeal,
they don't care. There's a reason for that
in my opinion. Oops.
Now, I keep posting at other people. They're
lying about this stuff. And I go, well,
here's a Jewish doctor telling you you're wrong.
Immediately put this warning on it. And it
gets zero engagement.
Like I said, this was exploding. This got
90% of that within the first 20 minutes
this was out. And they put the warning
on it, and then boom, it stopped.
Just like that.
Free speech. Yay. We're saving free speech.
Here is Mossad commentary point I've pointed out
many times,
saying, they won in a flood and we
gave them a hurricane.
Shefa's gone and with it, the IDF ended
the operation to Shefa.
Well, he says, well, went from, we didn't
bomb a hospital, to bragging about murdering 4
100 people while destroying a hospital.
Yep. Simple as that.
That's the that's that's Mas'ad literally saying, yeah.
Look what we did. That's not supposed to
be the narrative. And look at Shefa. They
literally destroyed it completely. They did not systematically
take out Hamas. They destroyed this. They pretended
there was a headquarters there. They never ended
up proving that because it doesn't exist. Not
there anyway if it exists somewhere.
They lied.
BBC and even I think it was was
it late corporate media
almost laughingly called them out about this. They
just didn't care. Nope. Doesn't matter. Genocide continues.
We have Jake Shields pointing out, Trump warns
America must stop,
being allies with England if they stop supplying
Israel.
So think about this. This is a this
is a Trump
aspect.
Trump,
special here here's the article.
Special relations at risk if UK bans arm
sales to Israel, says Trump adviser.
So that means that's through Trump's administration. It's
not somebody this is what the their administration
is saying. The our relationship is at risk
if you stop arms sales to Israel. Think
about saying that right now. And again, the
point is Trump or Kamala. It's the same
thing. They're both saying that. Doesn't that, oh,
isn't that crazy to you? And the idea
being is that they're literally murdering people as
we speak. They're killing American hostages, apparently. They're
killing Americans that are there in general. They're
killing children. They're starving people. And they're Trump
is saying, if you don't keep giving them
what they need,
we might not be friends with you anymore.
Oh, so we don't care about everything else,
but if you stop genocide
off the table, again, that's Kamala and the
rest of the it's all the same. That's
terrifying to realize that we're literally being worked
this is
these are our governments.
And we pretend like we're influencing a genocidal
maniac government that does what we want? Come
on. At the end of the day, guess
what? Today, UK suspends 30 arms export licenses
to Israel. Now what this shows me is
their government's at least not stupid enough to
keep pushing forward this genocide when they know
their people don't want it. I don't think
this government cares at all.
But for whatever reason, there is very clearly
more like immediate
I mean like life threatening influence over, this
government. I don't know how else to describe
it. How is it possible these people are
stressing the continuation of what everyone sees to
the point where people are like, maybe about
to go to jail.
And they're like, give them more. I just
it's just crazy to me. There must be
some kind of overwhelming influence that we need
to define.
Either way, the UK government pulled, and I
wonder what's gonna happen next. Is it Israel?
Is it Biden? Is it Kamala? Is it
Trump? Probably any one of them is gonna
say, you're the bad guy for not helping
Israel defend itself.
Either way, well, even the UK has ex
stopped exporting some of these weapons because some
of the weapons
because they see the writing on the wall.
Asal Rad points out, use and this this
is actually crazy. This is the the the
Guardian.
There was no mercy even on children.
This is from August
2024.
Few days ago.
Trauma in the West Bank after Israeli raids.
It says, Israel accused of using a 10
year old girl as a human shield as
it carried out its devastating attack on the
occupied territories.
Weird how that just went right under the
radar. Right? Even though it's literally at the
Guardian front page.
As she writes, using human shields is unacceptable.
Right? Wasn't that the was wasn't that the
thing we were all doing? Nobody's allowed to
use human shields. Bomb the air. Oh, except
except if it's Israel. I get it. I
get it. So she says, don't worry, Biden.
Officials will ask Israel to investigate themselves yet
again. I'm sure it'll all work out.
I just I mean, it's just so silly
how ridiculous I mean, it's, you know what?
It's makai
we're talking about human lives, so it shouldn't
be funny. But just I I pay you
to laugh at how dumb this all is.
That that, like, one of their driving
put conversations has been human shields. We can't
allow that. That's a terrorist act. And we
can literally, by the way, not this one
example, but endless examples throughout this entire process.
We've written entire articles about how many times
just since October 7th they've been caught with
human shields.
And then
Guardian writes an article about how they get
caught using one explicitly.
Crickets.
I mean, it's just incredible because the the
answer is not we care about human shields.
The answer is we care about using the
narrative to stop
whatever they're doing.
All through the article.
Oops.
And it's just that image alone. That's not
that long ago. They literally have a belt,
and he's literally tied to the front of
the cage on the on the truck.
Amnesty International,
a 100 and 79 health care workers have
gathered outside Saint Thomas Hospital to demand the
release of a 179
Palestinian
health workers
held in secret detentions by Israeli forces, probably
being raped and tortured.
Pretty good guess right now.
These brave health workers were taken by Israeli
forces while risking their lives to provide medical
care. There's the point. This outrages the Zionists
who are screaming about the hostages that, by
the way, Israel doesn't want back according to
their own people. Right?
And they're mad that Amnesty doesn't blindly sell
their narratives. The point is they're coming out
going, we're demanding these people back that you're
holding. All these 179 doctors.
More, by the way, than what you're claiming
you still have of people in Gaza. And
not even getting into the 10,000 plus people
you've taken from the West
Bank. The point is that this is they've
lost this.
That's why I've been saying everyone.
Everyone. The Zionist, the Israeli government, the US
government, you watching. We all know what's going
on. You can lie to yourself, you can
keep pretending like we're racist, but we all
know what's actually happening.
Everybody sees it because it's everywhere. It's never
been something more clear, ever.
I shouldn't say it like that. But right
now, in the last in my time covering
news, I've never seen something that had this
many like, this is everything.
Everything. From every institution,
every platform, every human rights group, a cry
it with it withstanding in the conversation. They've
come out and at the very least been
like, yeah, war crimes.
ICC, ICJ, Oxfam, UNICEF, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty
International, Doctors Without Borders. I mean, we literally
could keep going.
All of them. And yet,
we're debating.
Now
Israel plans to stay in Gaza. Do this
quickly, I forgot. So what the point is
that
great thread from VM.
The obvious reality, and here's the tweet themselves.
We are staying in Gaza. They're planning to
stay in Gaza. As it says, the prime
minister is not telling the truth. The truth
is that as far as Netanyahu is concerned,
Israel plans to stay in Gaza for the
next generation.
But we already know this. The sellers are
telling you this. Everybody except Netanyahu, they're all
telling you this. This is the plan. They're
gonna stay in Gaza forever.
Disclosed TV announces that Netanyahu has now said,
Israel will not withdraw troops from the border
between Gaza and Egypt for the foreseeable future.
What did I tell you? Occupying parts of
Egypt, which by the way it has been
forever going back in time, but the point
and it plans to
for greater Israel. So this is just one
more step in that direction.
Why is everybody okay with that?
That's that's illegal. There's no way around it.
But nobody cares because Israel is treated separate
from everybody else.
WikiLeaks points out, flash back 10 years ago,
Jerusalem post, Israeli strategic studies head calls for
complete destruction, depopulation of Gaza.
That's from 2,014.
I guess we just all make it about
October 7th. Right? Jonathan Cook points out the
same thing we've been showing recently. This is
a new Bloomberg article that's showing it. But
without question, guys, without question, the map showing
you the bombings in the area proves this
has been a indiscriminate
destruction campaign.
I mean, just based on the fact that
they bombed more than the major location throughout
World War 2 combined in this small location
in an 11 month period, there's no way
around it. It takes a a willful ignorance.
A genocidal willful ignorance to pretend like it's
not the most obvious destruction we've ever seen.
And West Bank, as we've talked about, is
part of that. Francesca Albanese shows you that
they're using the claim of self defense now.
I told I I said this jokingly.
They're saying that they have to go into
the West Bank to defend themselves.
I mean, this is getting this it was
absurd from the beginning. It was absurd 75
years ago. This is insulting.
So she's calling and announcing, look. They're now
they're gonna go after the West Bank. Like,
all of us who cared were telling you
from day 1.
They're gonna go after all of Palestine. That's
been the plan. And here they are showing
it to you, but new narrative. So it's
not the fact that you got it right.
They're just here there's why. Like, we've saw
we've talked about that with the 2 party
paradigm forever. We tell you, no. Here's what's
actually gonna happen. They go, no. Trump's gonna
do this. And then 6 months later, he
does it. And we go, see? He goes,
well, no. It's not because of that. He
did it because this makes sense and now
we need it.
Okay. Well, the point was not why. The
point was it would happen and we told
you. No. You're wrong. It's okay. It's just
it's the narrative is all they can comfortably
sit with. In this case, what did we
tell you? They're going to take all of
Palestine because that's what they've explicitly
been saying right to this very moment they
want. No.
You're racist.
Ryan Raspiani includes a great clip, and this
is the one I'll play about the West
Bank. Just a quick breakdown.
Is now launching a major assault against the
occupied West Bank in the latest step of
their genocidal campaign against the Palestinians.
The Israeli army deployed 100 of soldiers, armored
vehicles, bulldozers, drones, and fighter jets to try
to destroy what it claimed were militants in
the regions of Jenin, Tulkuqam,
and Tubas. At least 18 Palestinians were killed
by Israeli forces and dozens more have been
injured, bringing the total death toll in the
West Bank since October 7th to over 600.
On top of this, Israel's foreign minister has
now called for a voluntary evacuation of the
territory,
raising fears that Israel is going to do
the same thing to the West Bank that
it has been doing to Gaza.
Dude, just be clear, voluntary is the lie.
They say the same thing about Gaza. Voluntary
evacuation. But if they don't move, we'll shoot
at them, which is what they do. In
other words, ethnically cleansing Palestinians.
And these concerns are justified
as Israel has been slowly trying to take
over the West Bank since its illegal occupation
began in 1967.
Over half a 1000000 illegal Israeli settlers have
colonized the territory, supported financially and militarily by
the Israeli government in what is essentially a
land grab. It seems that the lack of
action over Israel's destruction of Gaza has emboldened
them to do what they want with the
West Bank without fear of consequence.
I remember when I used to report on
a new settlement development as some huge story,
And it was. It was illegal by everyone's
standards including the United States. And they And
now, it's just everyday. Everyday. Since October 7th,
they have gone crazy.
Mass displacement. I'm a talk about the West
Bank alone.
Here's why it reads showing you that the
Israeli settlers are oh, like, we've shown you
Daniella Weiss, who's just openly telling you, this
is what we're gonna do. They all know
it. We've had entire set of campaigns for
it. We've had Ben Gavir dancing with us.
We're gonna do it. It's clear. They're all
telling you. He's telling you Israeli settlers are
bragging. Here's the video you can watch for
yourself.
In Hebrew, openly bragging
about the massive territories in the West Bank
that they are currently stealing since October 7th.
Of course, with the Israeli army's help,
Previously, it says the Arabs were walking around
freely in the nearby fields and orchards. We
looked at them and we went crazy with
jealousy. That's what he said. Now all the
fields and all the greenhouses around us are
considered a closed military zone for Arabs.
That's what he this is the reality.
You think your government doesn't know this? You
think they can't look at Twitter? You can't
you can't watch what the Israeli media is
talking about? You think they can't look at
what's happening in the West Bank because the
human rights groups are pointing at it? They
don't care. They don't care about the law.
They don't care about you. They don't care
about these people. They care about themselves.
Here's Adam pointing out what the is where
the Palestinian,
in the West Bank go through.
This is a Palestinian police or, Israeli police
officer
beating a Palestinian, kicking him, bunching him. Right.
You know, democracy style,
simply because he's Palestinian, doesn't do what he's
told.
This is what they do.
Are are we gonna pretend like this is
somehow normal? Or is it I mean, sir
certainly can be in the context of US
police force who gets trained by Israel.
But realize what we're talking about is the
idea that Palestinian
people are treated like they don't count.
And the police know that. They'll tell you
that publicly.
Life is this is life under Israeli occupation.
The life they're told to just accept.
If that makes you mad, you're anti Semite.
As Al Rod points out or rather, Doctors
Without Borders says the scale and intensity of
Israel's 4 day incursion into Jenin,
the West Bank,
is a is very alarming. Israeli forces keep
obstructing access to health facilities, blocking even targeting
ambulances, delaying people's access to care. Here we
go again. Not Hamas and Gaza, but the
West Bank.
Okay. So there's all there's hundreds of people
all over Gaza and the West Bank. The
point is either place, why are they blocking
access to hospitals?
And now it's it's even more public because
it's not in Gaza.
They can't hide it, guys. They are ethnically
cleansing. They are torturing Palestinians. They laugh about
it. They know you see it, and they
think they can get away with it.
They go on to highlight the fact that
the different hospitals they're blocking, forcing people not
to get treatment. This is torture. This is
these are war crimes.
Anas Al Rod says, nothing to see here.
Just doctors without borders telling you Israel's obstructing
healthcare, targeting ambulances in the West Bank.
This is part of what's happening in Gaza
because it's an assault on Palestinian
life.
Here they are tearing up the streets.
Is that supposed is that Hamas tunnels? No?
No. Just the streets because we don't want
them to have infrastructure.
It's it's despicably
on the surface.
Like, do you realize how entertaining this is
for them to watch us see it, and
to watch our government pretend that's not happening,
and then just keep going?
That's literally trained impunity. They know they in
their minds, which hopefully is shown to be
false soon,
they believe that there are no consequences.
They're literally tearing up the streets with those
those things with the hook in the back
designed to just tear up the the rubble.
Why?
There's no even if it was hamant there's
no justifiable reason other than destroying their infrastructure
because they're going to destroying their infrastructure
because they're going to repurpose it for what
they're gonna do once they moved them out
of the way. That's what this is.
It's a and Al McLeod points out a
textbook case of ethnic cleansing, but this is
how BBC describes it. So this is what
passive voice actually looks like. Families leave Jenin
West Camp excuse me. Families leave Jenin Camp
in Israel, West Bank push.
Wow.
You mean ethnic cleansing and genocide? Murder? Which
has all happened? Robbery, rape, torture, theft?
Nah. Just West Bank push. Which, by the
way, is shockingly illegal, but, you know, West
Bank push. Like, some kind of, like, new
new tint dance move.
Francesca Albanese, the widespread
devastation,
and massacres
of the Israeli army in Jenin, which by
the way has happened. That's what BBC is
ignoring in that stupid title. And other parts
of occupied Northern West Bank where Hamas is
not ruling are a powerful reminder that Hamas
is just the last excuse for the state
of Israel to wreck to wreak
the Palestinian territory havoc. Everywhere for 57 years,
Israel has made life impossible for Palestinian under
the brutal military occupation,
seeking a to realize a greater Israel. An
agreement with the Palestinians in the occupied territories,
international protection presence must be immediately deployed
to stop the massacres, want the destruction and
forceful displacement. Now frankly, I mean, at this
point, I'd I'll take almost anything to stop
what dealing what they're dealing with. But I'm
also a little bit concerned about whether that
might be some kind of a ploy. I
don't trust the UN either.
But at the end of the day right
now, what something will stop these children from
starving tomorrow or right this moment kinda seems
like the most important concern. And I'll tell
you right now, they're better than Israel than
what the what's been going on. But overall,
I just I don't you know, I'm worried
about where that goes. Now here are the
numbers in case you wanna see from the
West Bank. 10,300
Palestinians have been arrested since October 7th.
The reason for that is because they will
then just they scoop up more before they've
leased some so they don't ultimately lose them.
An entire article was written about this the
last pause. They scooped up more than they
released in the first place. That includes 355
women, 720 children, 96 journalists.
8,000 plus are currently being held without charge.
None of this includes those who are being
held in Gaza.
Only democracy, most moral. Here's Elon Levy saying,
if you have Jewish friends, please give them
a hug. Send them a message to check
if they're okay. We're all crushed.
They said, well, these Jews are telling a
very different story.
Here's a holocaust survivor. I said, maybe don't
pretend you represent all Jews since bigoted Zionists
like yourself are opposite the biggest threat to
Jews on the planet.
Just in case you forgot,
here's a holocaust survivor telling you he's standing
with the people protesting Israel.
A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same,
and in the long term, we are going
to prevail.
Yep.
Here's that doc. When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're
Killing children. Right. He's he's a Jewish doctor.
There's a holocaust survivor. Here's the in this
in this other clip, here's a here's a
Jewish kid standing in the protest outside of
the Columbia campus where they're supposedly killing shoes
where they walk. Nope. Nope. They all lied
about that. Here is Avi Shlaim,
a very very prominent Israeli historian telling you
Zionism is racism.
But here's Elon Levy, apparently speaking for Jews
everywhere. This disgusting human being that nobody respects
is apparently speaking for all the Jews. No.
He's an idiot. No. I mean, it's it's
embarrassing to watch people stand up and act
like they have some kind of influence.
The point is,
everyone sees through these people.
I mean, I, like, I I shouldn't I'm
not saying that, like, everybody like, the point
is the conversation is obvious.
I think there are people that choose to
go along with the narrative that he's saying
because they're on that side, and then there's
everybody else that's, like, that's that's what I
think. I mean, I don't know. I mean,
I'm sure there's some sliver of category where
there are people that are just willfully ignorant
to it or don't care. But that's I'm
not including them. I'm talking about people that
are paying attention to this. And everyone in
the conversation,
I don't know how you can possibly look
at all of this and not see how
dumb that statement is. Right? But, you know,
maybe I'm wrong. I but I I'm thinking
more and more people are seeing through this.
This person says, you're an appeaser of evil.
It will not stop until you're dead.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. They're all the peaceful ones.
Right? Don't you get that?
Right. So
clearly, Twitter's okay with this guy wanting me
to die. But, you know, if I if
I call him a Palestinian or wear a
certain color shirt, oh my god, you get
racist and you get censored. The point is
I said, thank you for showing so clearly
to the world what you support. Murder, rape,
starvation of children, and what you really are.
Zionism is anti semitism.
He says, nice try, but the world knows
who Hamas is and what they want for
the world. And I said, oh, you mean
Hamas that Israel funds? That Hamas?
Yeah. Is that is that the one you
mean?
He said, by funds, you're referring to the
humanitarian aid Israel has given over the years?
If so, then yes. That's Hamas.
I said, do you mean the suitcase is
full of cash? The former Shin Bet head
describes in this video. You're so desperate. It's
sad. Explain how cash can buy humanitarian aid
in a place where it has to be
shipped in. Plus, the quote clearly shows it
was always about control. You know, that's the
quote from Netanyahu where it says, if anybody
wants to thwart the establishment of Palestinian state
has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money
to Moss. It's pretty obviously, you know this.
It's so it's fun to watch these people
flounder in the obvious.
He says, and you're a Jew hating anti
semite.
And there it is. I said, I'm the
cherry on top of the desperate deflection pie.
You are racist.
Classic desperate Zionist. You mean aside from the
many Jews I march alongside calling out your
genocide?
That doesn't seem to make sense. Maybe just
maybe you're the actual racist. We all see
you. And list a a
bunch of Israeli Jews speaking on the record
about how it's a a genocide in Hamas,
the whole thing. And weirdly, he doesn't respond.
And there's an artful class on how to
break down a ridiculous Zionist propagandist with the
facts. They can keep trying to deflect to
the next point long as you know what
you're gonna the point is they're lying about
all of it. It's easy. That's how dumb
it is. And Elon Musk, Pied Piper of
the dumb. Here,
Caitlin Johnstone writes out, when Palestinians say they
don't feel safe,
they mean they're afraid of being killed by
2,000 pound bombs.
When Zionists say they don't feel safe, they
mean they're afraid of experiencing the psychological discomfort
of encountering protests against the genocide that they
support.
Yeah, exactly.
Now, here is something I'm gonna skip just
speak for time. We're way longer than I
wanted today. But this is embarrassing.
This guy has a channel. Apparently, it's called
Charlie Charlie Veach.
He's this smug Zionist moron who walks up
to this girl wearing a kifa and says,
do you know what that represents rape or
torture? And starts, like, yelling at both of
them and acting like they're not he's not
yelling. He's smugly talking down to them, but
it's like telling them, you're wrong. And, you
know, that means rape, and you shouldn't be
able to wear that.
I mean, it's just And they're just calmly
going, no, you're wrong. Goodbye.
I I I love the way they respond
with this. But what I wanted to show
you in this, just for time, is that
overall,
this is everywhere.
People around the world, like, this this kind
of smug ass
person, I said for almost I guess I
said ass. You're going sorry. I didn't mean
to curse right there. This kind of smug
person
walks up to this random girl and just
goes, you're a bad person. You don't even
know it. And the reality is I think
most people right now are like, this this
guy, like, he's one of those guys. Like,
you're gonna act like you're higher high and
mighty when everyone seems to be aware of
what's really going on. And they seem that's
Adam says, are all Zionists like this? Offended
by everything? Ashamed of nothing? It sure seems
that way. Well, I'm sure I'll play that
in another video. The point was to make
sure we recognize that that's not what all
Jews believe. That's what Zionist want you to
think all Jews believe. Here, as I've shown
many times, Torah Judaism is one of many
groups around the world that are Zionists or
rather that are anti Zionist, anti Israel, but
are orthodox Jew. And I want you to
know that's not what all Jews think.
I'm talking in the name of orthodox Jewry.
Our message very clear as we can't as
as we can't go out to demonstrations this
year, so we need to keep social distance.
So but the message is very clear that
the social distance of Judaism and the Jewish
people are on the state of Israel and
the Zionists. We keep social distance against all
Zionists and against the Zionist state, And we
pray
we pray that there will be social distance
from the holy land. The Zionist state will
be totally removed from Palestine.
Now I I think he's trying to make
a play on the whole, you know, COVID
overlap. That because I think that that's what
I'm feeling from that, but you can decide
for yourself. Totally social distance,
and then then there will be peace on
the world. This is our message to the
al Quds march in the name of Jewish
people, in the name of the Jewish religion.
It is very clear. You need to you
need to be very clear that the state
of Israel
does not represent the Jewish people, does not
represent Judaism. They never represented the Jewish people
at all. And our message to the world,
especially to the Palestinian people, is that we're
feeling a suffering even we can't go out
in in mass in public this year
because of the because of the of the
virus.
But keep on keep on protesting.
Don't give up and free Palestine.
Right. That's so that's what I thought. Yeah.
So it's clearly a video from that time
frame. Right? There there there's plenty of these.
This is just one circulating from their accounts.
The point is clearly
I mean, and, again, there I've shown you
so many times and a lot of I
mean, I think was it Abby or some
others did some great work on that a
while back as well? The Zionist organizations are
I keep doing that. Anti Zionist organizations in
Israel. They're all Orthodox Jewish organizations because that's
ultimately the group that really sees it because
they're arguing Zionism is simply a manipulation of
the idea that the essentially, they're not supposed
to have Israel until the messiah returns.
They just skip that part. This is just
ridiculous. And act like god gave it. No.
This is Rothschilds, and there's and the British
government gave you it. And you pick between
multiple locations. So the point is they're offended
by that, and rightly so, because they're playing
the people of the world around their religion.
And the idea is that they do not
represent each other. They they they're calling out
Zionism as a ploy.
To finish,
Eva Bartlett, make sure you follow her, put
out a short compilation. Now for the for
the podcast, it's really just gonna be music,
but make sure you check it out on
the show. A short compilation of Zionist terror
gang activities
during the pre Nakba period.
So before the Nakba hour even happened, as
we keep telling you, there as as a
lot of these articles are framing Jewish terrorists
because these were Zionists
using Judaism even then before this. And remember,
even going back further, the point is that
Christian Zionists are what what the history shows
were the original of this. And the point
is that they thought they could basically use
the Jews to bring to, like, bring all
the Jews in this location
under the guy under Zionism and ultimately the
be the interesting thing today is it seems
the Jewish perspective of this is that when
the Christians are destroyed, they'll bring on the
end times. And then when the Christians believe
and the Jewish are destroyed, then that'll bring
on the end times. It's like as if
they're both sort of driving each other to
bring it happening. It's very it's a strange
conversation. Again, Adam's a good point for that.
But the overall idea
is that we can show Herzl, for example,
was a he's an atheist. All really, overtly,
almost anti
many statements are on board are basically whatever
you they would call antisemitism today. Disgusting sentiments
about Jews themselves. And the idea that clearly
you can see that he his statements where
he is an atheist.
You can argue he changed his mind.
But overall, you can see the origin point
with Christians. You can see the Jewish Zionism
that's taken over the idea of the Israeli
population as well as the world that believes
that, but it's now showing and diminishing. And
the orthodox Jews in Israel and around the
world are speaking up, it's some many of
them, and saying this is a play on
our religion.
So at the time, the point is they
were doing the same. Oh, I I kinda
I've got track. The point is that you
can see that they have these
countless examples. And this is at a time
when people weren't afraid to cover it because
it wasn't anything different. These were Jewish gangs.
Right? Jewish terrorism.
The problem is that we've been played into
that. That's why I was saying that the
idea of the illusion
that anybody highlighting the overlapping point, and that
it could be Christian as well, because there's
Christian Zionist, but that it's about that and
not the actual Zionist part of it. That's
the ploy.
So I'll blend with this to show you
this compilation. And she says, if only media
could report honest headlines like this today.
Thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I don't believe
Well, I'll leave it open. I'm not sure
based on timing tomorrow, but
hopefully I'm feeling a bit better. So I'm
hoping to get back into this more, more,
you know, consistently
as well as some other stuff I wanna
update you on, but in general, we'll leave
it there for today. Thank you for your
guys' support. If you are out there and
you want to help us succeed and you
want us to continue,
we're definitely in a place where we need
your support more than ever. So if you're
in a position to to to reach out,
donate, to support in some way, reach out
to me personally. Right? If you if you're
interested in in
Helping us not get taken down by the
attacks we're dealing with the lawsuits we're dealing
with. Right. Whatever you could spare in general,
but really more than anything,
sharing the content, because that gets it in
front of new people, which can then share
it with other people. And hopefully there'll be
somebody out there that's, you know, interest has
more than enough and is willing to help
us even more because that's ultimately what we
need because we don't have advertisers.
We don't sell things. I mean, we do
have our shirts we offer, but you guys
see it. I don't even bring it up
half the time. I just don't like marketing.
I don't like selling things. I like to
believe that if you build it, they will
come. Right? If you do the right thing
and you work hard enough with it and,
again, there's always a level of naivety with
that knowing that that's not gonna always happen.
But why not be the hardworking you know,
why not do those things anyway? I find
those to be good traits. But the point
being that I do believe with this field
in particular, that if you put it out
there
objective, nonpartisan, and just consistently do the work
as I think we've built this platform around,
people will recognize that. I mean, I the
the support base we've built has been built
around the idea that you guys can donate
if you want to. And I think that's
a powerful thing. And I do believe that
scares these other power structures because you how
do you stop that?
So ultimately out there, that's what we're saying
is share the work.
But if you can, the support is needed.
So I love you all. Thank you for
being here. As always, question everything. Come to
your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Let me
Let me preface these remarks with I never
never ever believe
Israeli figures.