First of all,
I I wanna point out there is no
traditional assessment of this vaccine.
As you know, it's approved for emergency purposes
based on the immunological
response, not on clinical outcomes
because
there weren't smallpox cases and the monkeypox outbreaks
before this were
not, large enough to really do a clinical
trial.
And so the immunologic response with the intradermal
approach is exactly the same as with the
sub q. Nevertheless,
in either case, we'd wanna collect outcome data
as we do with all vaccines. And I'd
also point out that the NIH will be
mounting,
a clinical trial and is working through the
logistics of that now. I know that,
both Peter and Rochelle have been involved
in that planning.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
August
28, 2024. Thank you for joining me today.
Now I was planning on covering the follow-up
from yesterday's show and a lot of stuff,
which I'm going to be doing no matter
what. But, of course, as you might have
seen, there's a major development
in the West Bank in occupied Palestine.
So today, we're gonna start with the update
around
the very, very large development in regard to
the central invasion of West Bank. Now it's
invasion is not necessarily the right term because
of the different dynamics around the reality of
the occupation and what West Bank is and
what Israel is in regard to occupy Palestine.
But it's important to recognize what a major
shift this is and what it ultimately shows
you about what Israel is trying to accomplish.
If if we're talking about Hamas and the
art the idea that this is the focal
point, then what's happening in the West Bank
simply doesn't make sense.
If you look at this or you understand
that this is about the ethnic cleansing of
all things Palestine,
then this begins to make sense. And the
world is it's impossible not to see this,
and this is causing a lot of frustration
for those that have been trying to build
a narrative, you know, during the genocide. So
we're gonna start with this to show you
how clear this is, what a major major
deviation from the narrative, what a major development
this is, and how, I mean, this is
just a simple continuation in a long string
of war crimes committed by the Israeli government.
We're gonna then talk about an important development
that we were gonna get to from yesterday
in regard to the
it's essentially a discussion of of, a town,
I think it's Plymouth, outside of Boston in
Massachusetts.
And and more than that, actually, it's broadened
out. There's now discussions in New York. Essentially,
that they're saying there's a growing problem of
what I'll just to to make it simple,
just e e e. It's an encephalitis
discussion. There's different versions of it. And claiming
this is a mosquito borne illness, which essentially
or at least the the historical understanding of
what this is is argued it's a mosquito
borne illness, depending on what you believe and
the validity of these things.
And that this is growing.
Now that in and of itself is the
story.
Now on top of that, they're gonna say,
well, we have a problem. Now we need
curfews.
You know, maybe another word of that could
be sort of like a lockdown conversation,
and this is building.
Multiple ideas of of shutting people in at
certain times and control based on a threat
of something that arguably is not a large
problem and never has been. And even within
the dynamic, it seems like it's an overreaction,
but, you know, let's just pretend like they're
being extra safe. I don't think that. But
then, of course, you overlap this conversation
with the with the discussion of what has
been going on up until this point. Now
right there, you could have conversations about what
this means. Could this be another rise in
the medical
another COVID 19 illusion type scenario? Could this
just be another way to develop the next
stage of this? Certainly possible. And we should
nobody should be dismissing these kind of possibilities.
So that right there is something to be
concerned about. The moment I'm seeing curfew, lockdown,
control around your life based on the threat
of some new illness,
I'm concerned. I'm skeptical. We all should be
based on what we just went through.
But then my point is you bring in
a conversation of something like the genetically modified
mosquito
program,
which despite the weird what I guess, actually,
the the expected coverage from corporate media, denying
that it exists despite the open converse I'll
show you all the direct statements from the
governments from their their
their application for their amendment of the experimental
trial of these mosquitoes in California and Texas
and Florida and all the East Coast. But,
you know, corporate media says fake news, but
here are the receipts
and how this is going on and what
that means.
Right there, the stage of whether or not
that is the responsibility.
Dumping mosquitoes around in in the country that
then
grow a mosquito borne illness. Now I'm not
saying that that's necessarily even by design. But
right there, wouldn't we ask that question? But
then you build further into the conversation around
what GM mosquitoes are, how they're developed,
the failures they've had, in quotes, around what
actually happened there, the conversation of tetracycline
inside the things they're using, or the idea
that these are not actually sound scientific practices
in how they're dealing with these GM mosquitoes,
and in fact, it's making them stronger. I
mean, this is all scientific studies directly from
nature, peer reviewed.
And then we could overlap that with a
conversation of things like
edible vaccines.
And I don't mean in the sense of
the new direction of where they're going with
this. I mean the ones they've been using
for a long time, Dumping these edible vaccines
in the wilderness for animals under the guise
that it's supposed to diminish the problems that
they have. And then realizing, but wait a
minute, those things are rife with tetracycline, which
is the problem of it's the it's the
chemical allowing these mosquitoes to essentially circumvent what
was supposed to kill them. I mean, we'll
go into all this. I'm just giving you
the outline very right in the beginning. We've
we've I've done multiple shows around this, which
is why I wanted to bring this back
around because I too see this building, and
it's very problematic for how large it's already
getting with something that's, I guess, as small
as what they're
talking about. And we're gonna go over how
that has been going on for quite a
long time and how I think this is
very much by design. And the other aspect
of it is the pesticide spraying.
It's all interconnected. Or even the idea of
the GM or the the flying
conversation. Another thing that gets laughing laughably dismissed
by the adults in the room when it's
a very obvious and provable conversation that they've
been re researching and conducting experiments around for
a decade or more. I mean, there's articles
in Nature. There's articles in corporate media platforms
where they say flying vaccinators could be the
new thing. And these are open real field
open field, real world experiments.
The point is all of these things tie
back into
aspects of why this thing might be happening,
and I just want you to have the
tools to be able to have this conversation
as this builds, and and hopefully doesn't, but
if it does go into something larger. Then
we're also gonna talk about the monkeypox conversation
and how these things intersect, obviously, and where
this seems to be going, the hype around
it, and a few other very important things
that I found in the in the research
of, you know, the current aspect. You know,
we've talked about monkeypox
the last time that I cleared the emergency,
the
a few times in between that around what
might be happening, how it's building, the lies
around it, the the injections they're pushing around
it, as the clip that played in the
beginning, that are really smallpox vaccines, which even
the corporate media at one point called the
most dangerous vaccine, or most deadly, I think
it might have actually said. And this is
because they're very, very dangerous, but they go,
well, but smallpox is just that much more
dangerous. So, you know, benefits and risks. Or,
you know, maybe we could just go, how
about we wait longer and do more research
now that we're not in the middle of
a smallpox epidemic and make something that doesn't
kill you half the time? You know? That's
just my thought. But at the end of
the day, no. It's because that's just so
dangerous, so we're willing to accept the dangerous
vaccine. But they're pushing that for this thing.
And I'm gonna show you some of these
overlaps that show that I think this is
I mean, at the very least, a deception.
I can see how this is being lied
about, how we're being played,
but that oh, there's a lot of concern
around this about whether it may be a
real thing this time, which we shouldn't dismiss
either. I have those share same concerns about
if this was what we all think it
was, why wouldn't the logical next step to
push it to be make it real?
In a controlled way even. Maybe that's what
happened last time. All these things we should
be asking. So leave it there to start.
We have a lot to get into.
Make sure
you're breaking these things up as we go
along, making notes, talking about it, share the
clips out, tag me, I'll share them myself.
So I wanted to start
with
West Bank and what's going on in Israel
because it really is a major development.
So And by the way, I was gonna
say too for those that didn't see the
show yesterday, I apologize for not having Not
that you guys even care quite frankly, but
I usually have my coat on. Ultimately, I'm
still dealing with this with my arm and
so, just in case you wanted to know
what's going on. Hopefully, by the next time
you see me, this should not have to
be there. I'm feeling like it's getting better.
But for those who don't know, I simply,
you know, stressed or hurt a tendon in
my arm a tendon in my arm, which
is the most frustrating thing I've ever had
to deal with in regard to work, but
we're getting through it. So let's let's talk
about West Bank and how important this really
is because you might be shocked to hear
this seeing as how I've I've not seen
this anywhere.
I've not seen a single conversation about this
in corporate media in the west right now,
anywhere. I guarantee it will come up and
I probably there probably are. I just haven't
seen them and usually the point is something
like this. I mean, let's be real about
this. No matter where you are in the
world, this is newsworthy. This is a major
step in a very I mean, let's talk
about the remember, like, for how long ago,
one of the mantras, hashtags, whatever you wanna
call it time was peace in the Middle
East. Right? This has been a central focal
point for their political,
like, manipulation, quite frankly, but it's been a
constant focal point around politics for a very
long time. And the central point of that
has been Israel, Palestine, and what they've been
doing in the area. So now we're at
a point where this is boiling over to
the point where they're literally committing genocide on
the surface of the conversation, and then they
invade the West Bank. An area where they
which we were being told I mean, even
Jordan came out early and said if you
cross that line, this will be war. So
we'll see what Jordan has to say about
this.
But what what what my point is is
the fact that this is getting so little
coverage,
even while it's a central topic for global
politics,
shows you that there are people that are
being coerced,
pressured, or falling in line to simply not
talk about this.
Because this is a major development.
In in just in the simple context of
what's newsworthy, it's it's a major invasion of
another location. Or really just look at it
like this.
They're we're being told this is part of
Israel. Right? I mean, imagine if if if
the Biden administration or depending on if it
was Trump at that point in time, the
Trump administration, decided to take military
forces
and invade a state. Or even let's just
say a a county somewhere. And literally invade
it, kill people in the process,
block off all the access to the exits,
shut down hospitals and seemingly prepare to attack
them. I mean, this is Gaza 2 point
o in the context of post October 7th.
It's all building. They've already killed people in
the West Bank.
Would you I mean, that should be huge.
They're invading themselves apparently. No, it's because they're
going after anything Palestinian and that's the real
point here. So Robert reported this yesterday, and
he's working on an article right now as
we speak. Israel launches a large scale military
operation in the Northern West Bank.
1,000 and, like, the Jenin West, refugee camp
area and different areas around there. Thousands of
soldiers will allegedly invade the air cover. Now
this is because they've discussed a division they're
gonna be using, and that usually, as Robert
points out, means somewhere between these numbers around,
you know, 1,000 of our least, potentially 10,000
or more. That's what they said. Doesn't mean
it's gonna be the what happens.
It says hospitals have already been besieged. Now
ask yourself why that makes sense.
They're I guarantee you the narrative is Hamas,
terrorists.
But just like we saw with Gaza, we
can already prove to you that this is
not even remotely the truth and 99%
of what they're doing. If even the other
1% is even like, my point is that
they have given the evidence they put forward
to justify that statement
almost roundly has been shown to be falsified,
lied about,
or some other horrible manipulation.
So when they're besieging hospitals
in the West Bank, and you start going,
oh, okay. That wasn't about Hamas Tunnels. That
was just because you were shutting down things
a Palestinians need. Or whatever you wanna fill
in the blank with, it simply means they
were not doing what they said they were
when they're besieging hospitals in an area where
Hamas is not a presence. Now to be
clear, there are fighters or rather people that
are associated with these groups
in in in gen in in outside of
Palestine in general. But the reality, even according
to Israel's information, is that there's a scattering
of individuals
who exist in these areas that are not
in some kind of mal grouping. Like, there's
not an armed group that's holding up in
these areas. Even according to Israel information, despite
what they're gonna now be telling you. And
Robert says the same.
So when they go after this, it's very
clear that this is not about what they're
going to be telling you in my opinion.
And he says they've been besieged in Jenin,
in Tuqorum, and 2 killed in Jenin so
far. As I understand, it's over 10 right
now they've killed. And realize this is just
right now. They've killed upwards of 10 800
people since just October 7th in the West
Bank. Funny how that doesn't get the conversation
from the people talking about this pretending to
care about what's going on. As it says,
fears of a 2,002 type operation. So just
more ethnic cleansing is what we're talking about.
Now, we're gonna get into this quickly because
I just I just wanna make sure you
see what's going on, it's only just kinda
building, we're gonna talk about this more. I
wanted to focus on the rest of this
today. But I had to show you this
and go through some of these clips so
you really see what's going on and see
how serious this is and how amazing it
is to watch in real time the Biden
administration stand up, Matt Miller in particular, and
say, we're sanctioning some of these settlers.
Oh, the settlers. You mean the settlers that
have been given official capacity by the Israeli
government because this is an Israeli government operation?
They're desperately trying to get you to think
it's a couple of rain sailors
that are hurting people in in the West
Bank. I'm gonna show you what's really going
on. And they think you're they think we're
that stupid that we can't look at what's
actually happening and see that this is an
organized military operation from the top highest ranking
of the Israeli government.
It kills me because these people are part
of this. And I don't see how they
can even pull back from this now. How
do you expect someone like Matt Miller or
Bill Barr Biden or Kamala or if they
were in the same position, Trump or RFK,
because they're all saying the same things, how
they could possibly back away from this now?
You are legally complicit.
Which almost help even if they wanted to,
I think from a from a political perspective,
they're going, well, we might as well see
this through because we're gonna go to jail
if we I I I actually get the
sense that might be where their mind is
at.
Decide for yourself because we're guessing at what
their mind their mindset is. I would never
tell you I know what they're thinking. But
look what we're talking about here.
A straight up, like,
dystopian marching style into I mean, look, there's
there's cars driving by. I mean, these people
ask ask yourself why this is the way
they would even conduct this. We're supposed to
believe that this is the area that they
don't like, the idea that in Gaza, we
left and we, you know, put them in
an open air prison, sealed them up around
walls. We don't let them come and go.
Also still control everything they can do. So,
yes, legally still occupied, but they they don't
have boots on the ground. In the West
Bank, there's checkpoints everywhere, they're not allowed to
live their lives without doing checking everything with
an Israeli control structure, but they pretend that
it's part of the larger area. And this
is how you act?
You march in like like stormtroopers into the
area, and, yes, and have begun killing people.
Lima points out in the West Bank right
now, Israel is imposing a siege on the
hospital in Jenin,
Literally cutting water pipes in Tel Karim. Settlers
are invading the Al Aqsa compound. Now don't
forget that Geben Gavir just literally said that
they're gonna do this. And by the way,
they do it all the time. Your corporate
western media just lies to you about it.
They go in the they it's let's be
clear.
Al Aqsa is a mosque.
It is not a it is not a
synagogue.
Now that irritates people that want it to
be that. But, yes, that's just currently what
it is. It is a synagogue. Or excuse
me. It is a it is a mosque.
So it is where Muslims go to pray.
Now the Jewish population believe that that this
is going to be a prophetic location where
once it's destroyed, the third temple will be
re re rebuilt and that'll bring on the
end times and blah blah blah, all the
narratives and prophecies.
So the point is that Ben Gavir, who
is one of the most prophetic lunatics out
there, is pushing the idea that they need
to do that. That we need to storm
the area. We're gonna turn it into a
synagogue. It's gonna be our all of these
things are huge deviations from the norm, at
least we pretend it's the norm, and crimes.
Bottom
line. And so now, when you can see
that there are settlers who are be giving
official capacity from the military are doing that,
we can't pretend like this is some independent
action. This is a coordinated
event.
A full scale assault on Palestinian lives and
sacred sites as she points out. I agree.
You got water running down these areas. Now
get this. If we jump forward a year
and you see the Israeli government going, look.
The West Bank, they can't even manage their
water. I wonder why. The same thing they
did to Gaza as the memory of the
western corporate media seems to last about half
a second. When they go, oh, yeah. Look.
They can't even manage themselves. Oh, did you
forget where they did this, where they told
you they were gonna do this? And I'm
not even talking about the post October 7th.
They do every time. Whether it's Yemen or
Syria,
they manufacture
destabilization and then turn around and go, look,
they can't even deal with their own problems.
They did it in Venezuela, they do it
everywhere.
The point is,
obviously, we're watching an a complete destabilization
occupation
of what's going on in the West Bay.
Sorry, I can't get the my my left
hand is killing me here. I'm gonna get
back. Get rid of that one. Okay. So
let's listen to Mustafa Vargutti telling you what's
going on. From his perspective, right, but I
agree with what his assessment is. Israel has
launched its biggest operation in the occupied West
Bank in the close to 2 decades
with troops raiding multiple towns and villages backed
by armored vehicles, bulldozers, fighter jets, drones,
literally using machines that we've seen Gaza to
just tear up the roads in the West
Bank.
How can you possibly explain that? If this
isn't kind of an operation to get the
bad guys out of the way, like they
pretend they're doing, why would you begin to
destroy immediately the infrastructure for the people that
live there to continue to live there?
I don't need to answer that. You all
well know. Anybody that even the people pretending
it's not the case, you know too. You
damn well know what they're trying to do.
It is
patently obvious.
Here's what he has to say about what's
going on. As he says, they're trying to
repeat the Nakba,
I guess, the 3rd time.
Vraguete, welcome back to Democracy Now. Can you
explain what's happening in the occupied West Bank?
Well, Amy, thank you for having me. But
what's happening is absolutely horrifying because what we
see here is Israel trying to transfer
the genocide war that is conducted in Gaza
and the war of ethnic cleansing from Gaza
to the West Bank.
And what we see here,
is is is a
unilateral
war
from the side of a huge Israeli army
which has airplanes,
which has tanks, which has
huge number of soldiers against basically civilian Palestinian
population.
You have to understand
that the West Bank is an area that
has been under Israeli military occupation continuously since
1967.
So it's an occupied territory,
and now the Israeli army, which is occupying
us all this time, is conducting a war
on occupied people.
And that's the thing I was saying before,
but also don't forget that what we're discussing
around the idea of Gaza and the West
Bank
and and way way more than the current
understanding of what those things represent.
This goes back to the the, the discussion
around 67 borders and the 2 state solution.
So this was agreed upon, on paper anyway.
That this was supposed to be what went
forward. Now Israel pretends that the Palestinians have
never allowed that to happen. But we now
know as we all should if we're even
remotely paying attention and care about the facts
that they have actively made that not the
case. They have funded Hamas to keep them
divided. That's their policy,
stated policy now.
So the point is they made sure that
the group they pretend they're currently fighting was
in power to make sure that they didn't
agree on what ultimately happened and then just
committed terrorist acts against them repeatedly and over
and over.
Now bottom line is that these things have
continued to shrink. Why? Because they've continued, based
on their public policy, despite what western governments
tell you, to take more of these areas.
That's the West Bank
displacement. They move them out of their homes.
They destroy the homes. They make a swimming
pool. And they go, yeah. It's because that's
our territory or whatever. The bottom line is
whatever you they think or to pretend they
think,
that every time they do that, even according
to the US government stance,
is illegal
because they're taking more territory
from the area that was supposed to be
given to them to make their 2 states
doesn't matter. They keep doing it. Right now,
since October 7th, has been the most the
largest
increase
in in mass displacement and occupied like, in
the West Bank explicitly.
Why? Because they're taking advantage of what's going
on. To do what they've always planned to
do. That's the only way you can read
this. And And I'm gonna show you in
a minute, statements explicitly from people like Smotra
saying, that's what we're gonna keep doing.
Now now counterbalance that with what Matt Miller
says where we're sanctioning a couple of these
settlers on the ground because, you know, they're
bad guys.
Oh, I guess you forgot about Netanyahu, Mozambangaveer,
and the entirety of their government, right, who
are actively ordering this to happen.
Yeah. But or or we I guess we
forgot that Matt Miller is a complete coward
and feckless
liar and misrepresenting the reality, or he's paid
to do that. Whatever you wanna think about
it.
It's,
the worst and gravest possible violation of international
law that governs the behavior of an occupying
power.
And their goal is very clear. It's as
Israeli minister
of foreign affairs said, it's ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians.
This is a fascist Israeli government governed by
fascists like Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Ben Gurir,
whose goal and aim is to annex the
West Bank, is to settle Israeli illegal settlers
in Palestinian territory and
displace the Palestinian population.
They are trying to repeat the Nakba. They
are trying to repeat the ethnic cleansing that
took place in 1948.
And this time, the Israeli army is invading
not only Jenin and Tulkarem and Nur Sham's
camp and Tubas and Farah camp. They are
invading in so many areas in the West
Bank.
So many villages tonight were attacked and continue
to be attacked.
Hundreds of people have been arrested in this
campaign.
And
the the the worst thing is that the
Israeli army and bulldozers
are destroying the infrastructure
in
many refugee camps, especially Nur Shams camp and
Jenin camp. They are destroying roads. They are
destroying power, infrastructure.
They are destroying water
pipelines. They are,
destroying
homes,
and there is no limit to what they
are doing. And, at the same time, the
world is watching and doing nothing.
It's a it's an absolute
absolute unacceptable,
horrible war crime that the Israeli army is
conducting once again inside the West
Bank. And I repeat, they are trying to
to to to to repeat the same ethnic
cleansing, the same genocide that is committed in
Gaza,
where, by the way, the war crimes continue.
And every day, we are, the Israeli army
is killing 40 or 50 Palestinians.
Most of them, of course, are civilians.
Now let's also not forget
the basic reality of international law. Like, there
is lit I mean, I don't even think
Israel can make an argument about how they
don't occupy the West Bank.
They can make an argument how they are
allowed to, but the reality is no matter
where you stand, they're occupying the West Bank.
They're also occupying Gaza, but that's a narrative
they always spin around. So the bottom line
is, knowing that, and knowing that everybody, for
every stretch, even the United States, even the
not all the United Nations, every international lawyer
you speak to, that this is an occupied
territory. So what that means is by default,
because you're the occupier,
you do not have a right to do
this
or defend yourself. They have a right to
fight you because that's their legal right under
the Fort Geneva Convention for International Law, armed
resistance against the occupier.
These things all matter.
So I don't need to explain to you
why this is illegal, it's easier to understand
why in one specific way it's up not
up for debate. This is illegal in every
stretch of the imagination. What they're gonna try
to turn this into is them defending themselves
still because of October 7th. It's already all
the narrative's already floating around.
Important to think about that because these things
are basic
incontrovertible
facts.
Now he this is the the point about
the hospitals in general. There's one more adding
it. There's videos of them. Those videos all
it's just crazy what look at these videos
of these kind of this stormtrooper kind of
mentality. But Israel block blockade of another hospital
in readiness for an attack. This is the
Jenin governmental hospital in the West Bank. Hamas
are not in the West Bank. And I
agree. That statement is accurate
in the sense of any kind of a
coordinated response or even a remote, like, other
than individuals that have some association with what
was currently the government or what was previously
the government in the area. Alright? That that's
not the same as saying you're an armed
combatant on in Hamas.
Either way,
remember that even let's just say somebody's part
of Hamas, if they're not acting in an
official capacity with a rifle or doing anything
military, you're still not a target. The same
in reverse.
Just because so but that's the same thing
applies to any of these people. Whether it's
in when again, same thing I make about
Hamas on October 7th. When they took children,
that's a crime. Period.
Anybody saying otherwise is is lying to you
or doesn't understand the reality of international law.
But that doesn't mean that the act of
armed resistance in a general sense was invalidated.
So the point in reverse is that Hamas,
let's just say there's an individual in the
West Bank, doesn't justify what they're doing
in any way, shape, or form. But it
says it's never been defense, and I agree
with that. He says it's always been oppression,
it's always been a land grab. 100% agree.
Now here's the example of what these I
mean, this is posted on Israeli media. Basically,
praising the idea. They're just run you've seen
these in Gaza. I've shown you many times.
These tractors they're using, or whatever you wanna
call it, where they drive down the street
with this big metal bar in the back
and just rip up the center of the
street.
There's only one reason you do that, to
make sure that they cannot use their public
streets.
I mean, you have to realize that e
that even diminishes what they can do on
those streets. So the point is they're willing
to hurt their accessibility
just to stop them from existing in this
area.
In In Gaza, they try to make an
argument about terrorism or whatever else. They're literally
doing this in the middle of a currently
massively populated area in the West Bank, which
is technically part of Israel in their mindset,
and they're driving down the road and tearing
the streets up.
It's the same thing they did in God.
They are demolishing
infrastructure of all things Palestine.
It says the roads in the West Bank
are Hamas. They're making a joke. Right? Because
that what what else are you gonna tell
us? This is how sick, evil, and twisted,
deranged, inbred supremacist mind thinks. That's what he
said. Destroy all infrastructure to force people out
as refugees after making their lives miserable. Right?
So then the rest of the the western
world can pretend like those refugees are now
are all you know, you know how it
goes. They drive them out and same thing
whether it's foreign policy of the US government
in Venezuela and then we blame them for
being refugees. Or some people do. Or right
now, for example, you destroy their lives back
in 19 forties. Right?
Create the entire conversation about how why they're
refugees, why UNRWA has to exist for the
right of return,
and now all these years later turn around
and say, oh, they're terrorists because they're refugees.
Oh, they're taking our resources because they want
to be refugees. It is and the whole
point is that if you just simply gave
them back the area which the UN the
UN and the international community already decided 67
and after before,
that that was what that would mean, you
give them back these territories, they can come
back to their homes, they still have the
keys, and we all put this to bed.
But Israel made sure that wouldn't happen. So
it's just criminal.
Criminal activity, no matter how you spin this,
in every possible direction.
Now now you could skim I wanna include
just kinda the search for West Bank. You
can look through some of these videos and
just show you what people are pointing out.
Some of these are ones I grabbed, but
just it's all over the place. Like, here's
just an example of settlers just stealing water
from Palestinians because no one cares. They get
away with whatever they want. It's it's just
this whole situation is disgusting
on a surface. Now, here's Matt Miller. The
US continues to take action. Oh, continues. Right?
You mean, like, the one time you flirted
with the idea of sanctioning settlers, but then
scurried away with your tail within your legs
when Smotrich said don't do that? That's what
happened. You you realize there's no other aspect
of them sanctioning. So it's not it's not
happening. But US continues
to take action to promote accountability
for those who commit and support extremist violence
in the West Bank. What does that even
mean?
You continue to take action,
that would mean something. But, no, Continue to
take action to promote accountability
for those who commit crimes. What does that
mean exactly? Does that mean standing on your
podium and saying we'll raise the issue? Because
that's all you're doing.
And so the state department is sanctioning Israeli
NGO,
Hashomer Yosh, an Israeli civilian security coordinator,
Flint Filant, in connection with such conduct. Oh,
right. Because a couple of random individuals not
connected is explicit to the government is obviously
what's happening right now. Right? Official military orders,
official military,
what would you call it? Like, I mean,
this is this is ordered from the top
down.
And this is what we get from the
cowardly US government? I mean, guys, these are
they're part of this. There's no other way
around it, or they know if they go
against this, something bad will happen. You can
read into that wherever you want.
This is PBT saying, a picture of these
sanctions.
It's the Cheeto blocking some kind of a
door opening. It's ridiculous. I mean, the point
is, it's toothless
by design.
And not even aimed, even remotely, at what's
actually happening. This is true what this is
designed to do is let you
ignore what's happening. Oh, it's just a couple
of random individuals acting out. Yeah. They got
it. No. It's a military operation to destroy
the West Bank.
UN announces sanctions on Israeli settlers
over vest West Bank violence. No. It's not
West Bank violence. This is a military invasion
of an area that is already occupied.
A little different than settler violence. But see,
it's funny how all this time there's been
rampant settler violence. Rape, torture, burning people alive,
and they don't even bring it up. Now
when there's military
operations,
now they talk about settler violence. Why? Because
they don't know what else to do. This
is pathetic.
We need to ridicule these people and hope
they end up in prison because this is
complicity and genocide.
Now get this. Matt Miller's over here going,
we're gonna sanction these settlers because they're allowing
this.
Meanwhile,
here is the president of Israel going, we're
gonna keep doing this. We're gonna keep taking
West Bank territory. We're gonna keep expanding our
illegal settlements.
You know, the same thing Matt Miller was
trying to convince you is a couple of
randos doing not doing their own thing. This
is incredibly stupid.
But again, I don't even need to convince
you. I think most people in the world,
including those that are lying about this, all
know that.
Yeah. I can I mean, I'll I'll I'll
play a code? It's only 17 seconds. It's
it's,
captioned.
He speaks in Hebrew. So he says,
settlement
has existed since the dawn of Zionism. Well,
yeah. Yeah. The that's funny. Good. Thank you
for making my point. You guys have been
illegally occupying Palestine from day 1. Not Jews,
but Zionism.
That's important.
And he says they are inseparable.
Think about saying that right now when the
narrative from the from the rest of the
world is, well, those are illegal.
And there's disputes on certain things, but, you
know, and man and they they they sanction
people for even doing this. And the the
international community has said that earlier, the US
government has said, please kinda tone down your
illegal actions. And they stand up and go,
we're gonna do this because it's inseparable from
who we are. And we're not supposed to
read into that.
I mean, I mean, that's that's not even
the right way to say that. There's no
even way to misunderstand that. He's saying, you're
wrong, US government. This is literally who we
are, and we're gonna do it either way.
But please keep lying about it so we
can keep doing it. It says this is
an opportunity to emphasize how much it has
been proven
and continues to be proven
that settlements
is vital for the people of Israel and
the security of Israel. You mean your human
shield dynamic? You mean building out illegal settlements
around the outskirts of where you are protecting
yourself on the inside so when something happens
like we saw with October 7th, you both
2 things, make them
illegal military targets as occupied territory and a
given official military capacity,
but also make sure that then you can
turn it into some kind of attack. This
it's again, you realize the core point is
this is illegal.
And he's openly, knowingly telling people this. This
is okay. It's who we are. Yeah. You're
right, actually. It is who you are.
As Khaleesi puts it, the president of Israel
encourages further creation of expansions of settlements, which
is illegal under national law. But Matt Miller
is telling you something else. Now Tiberius points
out the reality of this, and I've shown
you a 1,000 different ways of the same
point. And actually, I think we played this
video. But it's important to hear this. Because
this is
what Zionism is.
Full stop.
Quote, the Zionist out of Europe who laid
the foundation for Israel knew what would have
that they would have to ethnically cleanse Palestine.
Their their own documents say it publicly. It's
a the kind of willful ignorance around this
topic is I've never ever seen it as
this level anywhere else. It exists in other
conversations, but not to this level. To where
it's literally their own like, you know, like,
it's like having a video of Net and
Yahoo going, we're killing all the children, and
then people go, well, it's taken out of
context, or you don't understand, or you're racist.
That's what's happening on all these talking points.
It's that easy to prove.
He says they knew they would have to
do terrible things. The the record very clearly
shows this,
says John Mersheimer, American political scientist.
What Zionism
was supposed to be like or
you
think the Zionist ideology has evolved over the
last few decades? Zionism
from the get go was all about creating
a Jewish state.
But not to the extent of being genocidal
or cleansing
as you No. The Zionist understood from the
very beginning that you had to cleanse.
There's no way Okay.
Jews or Zionists
moving out of Europe can come into an
area that's filled with Palestinians
and create a Jewish state
without cleansing the area.
They understood that from the beginning.
This is very clear from the historical record.
The Zionists who came out of Europe and,
you know, laid the foundation
for what is Israel today were very smart
people. I mean, they're very smart, very clever.
They knew exactly what they were doing. And
they understood that they would have to do
horrible things to the Palestinians
in order to create a Jewish state. It
was just
inevitable.
There's no way you could create a Jewish
state otherwise.
Right. And as always, don't forget that at
the moment,
there are more Christian Zionists than there are
Jewish Zionists. And it's important to realize that
Zionism is simply a manipulation
of a lot of different things, primarily seemingly
religion at this point.
And there is a growing number of Jews
around the world that are calling that out
right now. As well as anybody else who
can see through it. But here is another
great clip, and there's a couple last points
this one includes since we're talking about it
to start.
The the this is much bigger than even
what's going on in the Middle East, or
what's going on in specifically the West Bank
or Gaza. The this is a world problem.
And that's not because we're over focusing or
because we hate Jewish people or we hate
Israelis. It's simply about the reality of what
this political organization has been doing.
And it's it can't it's not it's as
simple as that. And if you actually listen
to our arguments or look at the facts
on the table, it's undeniable what's really going
on. Here is Elon Poppe who's spoke talk
spoken a lot about this, exposes how these
rail lobbies have infiltrated American British governments.
And the my point is this is how
we ultimately get to a position where these
things are ignored
or where you have this kind of proven
record, whether it's UN discussions or whether it's
stated policy or if it's written out documents
about what they wanna accomplish or books they've
written. They explicitly lay this out. They call
themselves settler colonials. They I mean, it's everything
they pretend is not the case. You can
literally prove by their own statements it is.
And yet,
somehow,
the Bidens and Trumps and RFKs of the
world, they just go, fake news.
Why is that? How is that possible?
This is how.
New book coming out, which is called lobbying
for Zionism
across the Atlantic, and I show how from
1900,
both in America and in Britain, you target
politicians wherever they are. At the beginning of
their career, you commit them to Zionism and
later to Israel. And at first, of course,
they were not powerful enough to influence enough
people. But, you know, the more they grew
in numbers, they were able to influence more.
So when people say why does Biden so
automatically
supports Israel? The lobby doesn't need to ring
Biden and say to him, you better support
Israel. He knows the rules of Israel. He
knows the rules. He knows what happened to
anyone who even dare to slightly like Obama
or Carter, slightly challenged what happened to them.
You read Obama's memoirs,
you can see how he said, I suddenly
understood. Any word I'm saying in Israel can
bring down Congress. So, I had to be
very very careful. And, actually, what he says,
he admits, I could not be loyal to
my basic instinct, which was to be pro
Palestinian. I couldn't, because I wouldn't be a
president.
It's very important to understand that part of
this conversation.
And it's why it is the the the
only desperate screeching argument is to say, you're
a racist, which I'm sure at some point
that intersects just because it intersects anywhere with
anything. People are racist in the world. It
exists. But at the end of the day,
what they're highlighting here and in any number
of other discussions, and it's easy to prove,
is that there is obvious,
overwhelmingly
over the the influence of the Israeli government
on US policy to the detriment of Americans,
almost by by, like, by design, like, that
the actions they're taking are destabilizing.
But any case, the point is it's not
about what you want. You're pretending you vote
these people in. The point is they are
completely in line with something else. And it's
not hard to see if you're willing to
consider it. But of course, people get called
racist and they run screaming for many of
the truths that they'll, you know, think people
will call them racist for acknowledging.
Now I I'll I'll include
a general search for APAC,
which there's a lot. I mean, let's go
back to 2019, shows he did back then.
APAC, just the tip of the iceberg. This
one's from 2019 as well. Pointing out APAC's
influence over US is labeled anti semitic. Then
I think this was the time when it
was at AOC, I forget who said something,
or maybe it was Ilhan Omar, who basically
said, the Israeli lobby influences congress. And they
were like, oh my god. You're racist. It's
like, that's what lobbying is, guys. And it
it was it was a it it showed
you how sensitive they were to the idea
even though all you were it's like saying
lobbyists influence congress. That's what they do for
a living.
But when you said Israel's lobbyists do that,
you're suddenly racist. It really did begin to
expose this more than ever. RFK Zionist endorses
Trump Zionist. We talk about that in that
show. I'll include the link you can look
at. And I'll also include my great interview
with, James Lee who did a really great
little mini doc on ADL, which I think
is really well done. And so we talk
about this as he says himself, it's basically
a spy organization for Israel. And APAC being
an Israeli organization that you can prove ties
back to Israel's creation or the create Israel's
creating it. And then publicly saying we didn't
want this to be perceived as a middle
man for Israel, so they rebranded it. And
then rebranded it again in 59 to be
APAC pretending it's an American organization. It's literally
written on, like, Wikipedia, but let's lie to
ourselves because, you know, racist accusations.
Let me include these for you real quick.
Take a second with my
okay. I won.
Make sure you watch these too. I think
those are important
for this topic in general. And then lastly,
on this, I just wanna show you these
2 things that were interesting.
Brianna gray Joy Gray says working tirelessly because
the narrative is they're working tirelessly to reach
a ceasefire and end the war. Except that's
completely ridiculous when you realize, as we just
showed you the other show, they've just completed
their whoops. Their 500th,
500,
500th air delivery of weapons since October 7th.
But this is the point. If you break
that down, as Bryce Greene points out, that's
a delivery
about once every 16
hours since the genocide started.
I mean, this is the conversation of say
it's like saying, okay. Think about it like
this. All these statistics are breaking records everywhere.
Like, one child dies every 10 minutes. I
guarantee it's more than that right now. That's
the last time I looked. Every 10 minutes
a child is dying. Right? So we've been
live so far
for 40 minutes. That's 4 children have been
killed just since we've been on the show.
I guarantee it's more than that right now.
The point is that on top of that,
as they're highlighting here,
every 16 hours,
they're delivering another shipment of weapons as they
pretend they're trying to stop it all.
This is complicity.
Like, no matter on on paper, from a
from a legal standpoint, there is just no
taking that back.
The world sees it. And I think this
is part of the reason why it's become
so
I like, there I don't think there's gonna
be anything that the dislodges
is US government support for what's happening.
Ellen Jones, I'll include this thread, just shows
you, you know, just what these people are
doing. And we're talking about the Zionist IDF
members who are torturing Palestinians and posting things
on TikTok. This is a this this thing
this is just a the one of the
weirdest things.
The the it's like every other day we
see another picture of IDF members who are
in the homes of Palestinians
wearing women's lingerie,
spray painting on the walls. I mean, this
here here's the one that went around the
most. Israeli soldiers in Rafa looting and wearing
women's underwear and dresses belonging to displaced or
killed Palestinian women. Just sitting in their homes,
laughing it up.
I mean, there there is something in in
in
I don't know what's
it's evil, it's wrong, clearly. This is disgusting.
But there is something
broken about this.
Not just like, it's not some kind of
a running meme. I mean, even if you
were to pretend it's sort of like a
trend or a meme kind of thing, why
is it possible in a society for this
to become the trend? There's something wrong here.
It's disgusting.
And as
Owen Jones points out,
these are the Israeli soldiers posing in the
clothes of Palestinian women who they have displaced,
maybe maimed, maybe killed, maybe raped. Because that's
real, and we all know that now. Don't
miss the doll's head. They decapitated and hanged
in the corner.
You know, very very rational, sane minded people
we're dealing with here. Right?
There's something wrong, and we need to acknowledge
that. It's not about race or religion, guys.
It is about ideology.
And just like we can acknowledge that Nazism,
for example, is a clear problem, we need
to begin to highlight why this is also
a problem.
Now, we'll be coming back to that as
this continues to develop. So please let me
know what you see and what's going on.
As I said, maybe today, possibly tomorrow. Robert
will have an article breaking down what's going
on there. But my gut tells me, guys,
that this this is gonna spin out. Like,
we're gonna see this because of this action.
Like, I almost would be willing to argue
just a kind of a gut feeling that
this was done to force the hand of
the United States because they don't seem to
be doing so in regard to Lebanon or
any other dynamic.
Despite the way I mean, they're bombing in
Iran. They're bombing Lebanese territory. They're getting completely
shown that they can't do anything. Like, Israel
is failing in every field of war right
now. And the US just seems to not
I mean, we know they're involved. We know
that they actually have troops on the ground.
I mean, more so than the beginning. There's
been an official deploy in the Middle East,
in general, deployment. But
to me, there has still yet to be
this kind of symbolic, like, public idea that
they're standing alongside them, resisting or, you know,
attacking these countries.
But my point is that this,
almost by the idea that I think the
US feels like they might need to manage
how bad this looks, they might this might
draw them in. I hope not. Because I
I'm worried that this will escalate the problem.
I mean, escalate. I mean, we're watching a
world war play out in front of us,
but I think what we need to worry
about and I'm not saying that in the
context of, like, hyping that. Because, you know,
there's a lot of false hype around every
shadow being world war 3, but we need
to just be acknowledging the reality of this.
We're watching multiple fields of war, multiple countries
involved. I mean, that's what we that's what
I mean, there's far less in in that
in regard to these previous World War discussions.
I mean, this is what that would realistically
be if you're using the same metrics of
the previous conversation. But things have shifted. I
mean, obviously, war in general has shifted.
Anyway, the point is that I think I'm
worried about how this goes forward and how
Israel might be pushing
the the US government that can't seem to
tie its own shoes. I mean, like, I
think what it's what worries me is the
fact that the US government seems so easy
to manipulate.
I I how is that even possible with
the amount of
anyway, I'll I'll leave the hypothetical for later,
but we need to make sure we're aware
of this, making sure your neighbors and people
around you know what's going on in this
context because your tax dollars are paying for
this. Whether the US is on the ground
or not,
6 every 16 hours, your money, your tax
dollars are being used to give them weapons
to continue murdering children.
What kind of human being wouldn't care about
that? Especially when it's your money being used.
So make sure we're staying up on this.
Now let's talk about this conversation because I
do think this is important. Because I do
I continue to see this build.
And I've talked about this a lot over
the years.
Now,
to start off,
I think this is important because of how
these conversation I I honestly don't know how
to read some of these accounts, whether they
just share whatever comes in front of them.
Right? This one got a lot of reach
during COVID 19.
A lot of these groups did.
My point is that this is something we've
already seen, actually. I think this came out.
I saw this video circulating back the last
time, and this the same thing happens, whether
it's Lahaina or whoever else. Every time that
something like this happens, you get a lot
of these bigger kind of, like, only Twitter
type influencers that are just like a random
faced account. You don't even know who they
are. They don't have a website. But there's
the 100,000,000 of followers. They just dump out
videos that have been around from before. And
we ask every time. Like, how much anytime,
I guarantee you, mark my words, the next
time there's any even adjacent
kind of direct energy weapon conversation, you're gonna
yet again see those fake videos of the
green laser they keep telling. It's not these
are fake. I they've lied. You know that
these things exist. I'm the one that is
very clearly broken down how obviously there is
a real direction in this that is actively
part of their arsenal and that there was
very clearly a direct energy weapon location on
Mount Ohaina. I was the one that first
broke that down. Then, of course, the point
is that everyone dumps in these assumptions and
false information and videos from things that aren't
actually what they appear to be. You know?
And that that's free speech for you. I
I endorse that. I also endorse the idea
that I can call them wrong and say
that you're lying or you did this or
you have a you're a bad journalist. That's
all free speech. My point in saying that
is that this video whether deliberately or not
is actually an older video that's already been
circulating around. And and again, I noticed this
before this
reader note was added
because we've already talked about this. If you
remember, we've shown it. Now this video, at
least as they tell you, is supposedly some
kind of a gender reveal thing where they
dumped what what does look like a blue
string of smoke
when the video has not seemingly been changed
color to make it look darker. That's what
I also noticed. Remember when Snoop Peters and
them shared the information about Oprah's house and
said, look, look, it's a blue roof. In
fact, but they used the wrong house that
wasn't the location they said it was, and
they also changed the color of the picture
to make it look like it was blue
when it's actually brown.
That's what they do, guys. That's deliberate misinformation.
And, yeah, that's also under free speech, but
we have to call them out for it.
Now all that's to say that this went
around saying a town in Massachusetts prepared to
lock down well, really there's curfew is where
we're at for the next few months because
of deadly mosquitoes.
Here it says here's a flashback to just
recently when this helicopter was filmed releasing mosquitoes.
Now again, you can look this for yourself.
It's it's easy. Look, there's YouTube videos where
you can see that there's a date and
there was and it's clearly what it was.
Blah blah blah. The point is that that's
not that's not even the relevant point in
all this. I can prove to you that
they are releasing GM mosquitoes in the in
the the country. That's a fact.
Now what I I can't find anything that's
necessarily show that it's happened in Massachusetts.
And I don't even think that's the point
he's making here, just that it's happened. Right?
But I ask you this. When these things
start bubbling back up and there's a problem,
you have to at least ask yourself whether
something like this is being put out in
order to bury the conversation. Or so we
don't like, my point is that why would
we have to put something out that we
can already show is not what it appears
to be when you do have evidence of
the real thing?
All I'm highlighting is there's a very clear
concern from we've been bringing up a lot
of that there are partisan, or maybe not
partisan, just people out there who take advantage
of these things. And I'm not even trying
to say that's what he's doing. I don't
know.
But I do know that at the end
of the day,
every time this happens, there's something out there
that is
incorrect, let's say. Or they lie about it
or they alter it or whatever you wanna
look at it as. And that causes people
to look at it, go, oh, look. There's
the note. Oh, it's all fake.
And then ignore or even start thinking that
the entire conversation is actually fake.
Now that may not be the point of
this. It may have been my accident, but
that is I am convinced
something's happening. That that's they're out there. Whether
this or not, there's a deliberate effort
to muddy the waters
about around important conversations.
I made the same point about the whole
died suddenly overlap with how that worked, and
I made that point many times.
That actually hurt the truth around that conversation
despite what many people still probably think.
I I think it's very easy to see.
I you know my opinion about the people
that were behind most of that. Either way,
we just need to be on guard about
that. That's all I'm saying. So let's get
into the point about this. This is what
caught my attention.
And I've I realized immediately that this was
coming out, like, right as this conversation was
getting attention around what's going on in Massachusetts.
Now, yes, again, this video is not what
it appears to be. Now, here is Delania.
We we re we've referenced her many times.
She's do she's a great
investigative journalist.
Now, she points out something
around historic
research into doing this. Now I just wanna
play it first, since this is under the
clip we're starting with, and then we're gonna
get into
what's currently going on in the areas.
Really, it's broadened up to New York as
well at this point. And show you what
they're doing, show you what they're suggesting, what
they're pushing, and then we'll go into why
I think this is not what it appears
to be.
Oh, looks like I forgot
that video. Give me one second.
I know I've got that in there somewhere.
Let me just grab it real quick so
I don't have to take any more time.
So you guys remember, she she did some
great work around a lot of different things.
And one of the earliest ones around like
the bio bio labs
in Georgia,
or, you know, in in like the country,
and a lot of different discussions around that,
and, you know, just really highlighting a lot
of the important conversations that a lot of
people are afraid to touch on. I think
she does good work.
Okay, here we go.
And this one has to do with a
study that's been brought up more than once.
I think RFK Junior mentioned it in regard
to the the the the, you know, kind
of like a a really disgusting conversation about
cost benefit analysis around murdering people with bio
weapons. It's really interesting. So here's what she's
talking
about.
In my country I don't know.
If you want to read a lot about
more about the mosquitoes and their and the
test that the Pentagon,
has been performing on them,
on them,
in the past and now,
you you can follow these links. What shocked
me was one document in particular
in the past. The US
army
tested how to kill
625,000
people for just
29¢
caused by death.
And,
it turns out it's very cheap to kill
625,000
people.
Can you imagine,
what these people were doing in the past?
This Now think about this in the context
of all of these conversations start like this.
Everything. It always starts with a military purpose
around, you know, like what they're she's talking
about weaponizing mosquitoes to kill people. Just like
they tested ticks so they all they still
to this very day, test in these directions.
These are bio weapons.
That's and this is not a secret despite
all their narratives around how they're, you know,
working on vaccine technology. It's it's all the
same direction. It is always weaponized when they
can. Or really, I would argue that's what
it is, and then they give you a
narrative around the rest of it. And maybe
some people go in the direction of potentially
trying to use what they weaponize first to
help people. I don't I just don't know
why. It's hard for me to even accept
that with how much we've seen. But in
any case, we need to realize this started
like, a lot of these things start with
the idea of the government figuring out how
they can use them to hurt people, to
kill people, to suppress and again, you could
argue it's about foreign countries,
but all we have to realize is this
is a real thing. That's all this really
comes down to. This the very same what
they are doing now.
If,
this program
was
offensive,
this means that the current program is also,
for,
military needs for, offence, not for defense.
I want to compare
what they are doing now with what they
did in the past
Because this proves that their military program has
never ended.
Drone appeared.
This is very, very scary. This is,
another
Pentagon
agency working
and involved in the program.
It is called
the Safe Genes. This is the name of
the program, Safe Genes.
It is
$65,000,000
program in gene editing.
This is the sum that the Pentagon invests
in gene editing
gene editing of insects.
And you know we've talked about this a
lot. Insect allies and the conversation and this
predates this conversation. We've talked about the idea
of the self spreading vaccines. It's the same
overlapping conversation. And the insect allies part of
it was a was a I or and
it called out by scientists around the world.
They said this was a Trojan horse. You're
using this. It's a weapon. And you're phrase
you're framing it as some sort of tool
to help save crops.
And they pulled it back.
Like, that it's it's so transparent. And then
we got the mRNA injection. And I'm I'll
put you that clip actually because it'll make
it come together.
And, another military program called Insect Allies,
GM insects
are engineered
to transfer modified genes to plants.
The,
10,000,000 And part of it was about the
idea of using them to destroy crops to
hurt foreign countries, but also simply that you
could turn them into just things that could
deliver assassinations.
Anadolah's,
project includes both gene editing in insects in
and, in the viruses that they transmit.
Can you
imagine what we eat, actually?
They can produce,
GM insects.
They can produce
viruses.
And they can
insert these viruses,
GM viruses in the GM insects.
Target the plants
so that the plants would be pest free.
This is their justification,
of course.
This is against pests.
They just produce and they invest $65,000,000
to be, for us to eat pest free
plants.
Can you imagine if this is true and
if they really want
to solve the problem with the pests?
If this plant is infected with GM virus
through a GM insect, can you imagine what
will happen to us? Right. And when this,
vegetable
or fruit, when we eat it, what we
actually eat?
And realize this this already got rolled into
the conversation as we are hearing now of
vaccines and plants, of antidepressants or lithium or
psychotics, antipsychotics
being grown in vegetables and plants. This is
not a hypothetical.
It is it has been going on for,
I mean, a decade. I've I always bring
this up. I wrote about this in regard
to GMO cannabis a long time ago. A
company that I think no longer exists, it
came up on A and Wake Up recently
in Canada called Prairie City Prairie City Inc,
I think, and they were working on at
the time
growing genetically modified plants with antidepressants in it.
And they got given the contract to make
GMO cannabis in Canada.
Gee, that sounds concerning. I've ever since, I've
wondered if that was something that started happening.
My point is that this was it this
is the same program.
It's terrifying when you realize how dark this
is. And,
I don't believe this explanation because, otherwise, it
would not be the Pentagon,
that invests 65,000,000.
It would be their department for agriculture probably
if they have such a department.
So here,
after that, we're all here is the independent
article. US military plan to spread viruses using
insects could create new class of biological weapon,
scientists warn. Now if you read it, the
point is the scientists, the world around, signed
a document saying we can't allow this. Like,
it got a lot of attention and then
they quietly pulled it back. But they didn't
really is the point. It not only kept
getting used, it actually got rolled into all
sorts of other things. That's that's this is
how this always works.
Now here,
let me grab that. I'll I'll hope it'll
pop up. Let me see.
Is already
Shoot.
I think I had it in all something
is already generally modified, something like that.
For the podcast, I'm looking at the the
article about that. I guess I don't have
to include it, but it's it's an old
article that I wrote a long time ago.
And it was interesting
There it
is.
Looking for this while we're waiting.
And so this It's important to read this,
and it shows you This goes back to
2,015.
And right here, we talk about, oh, Prairie
Plant Systems Inc. Excuse me.
And how they were given this contract around
GMO cannabis.
And one of their primary goals was to
make plants with
antidepressants and other other
pharmaceuticals in it. And the point is that
that's that's just how you frame it. Right?
You could be anything.
And then think about something about how even
that could kill somebody. Right? I mean, if
if you wanted to make it that way
Oh, here we go. This is the one
I think. I think this comes from an
article
from, the free thought project in 2018.
I'll open both of these.
Okay. So here is the
article from the Free Thought Project, I think.
Yeah. Science This is from Matt Agaras. Scientists
accuse DARPA of genetically modifying insects for bio
weapon to spread agricultural diseases. It's a great
article. I'll include that for you to read
it so you can understand
more of the picture we're seeing. And then
also this article from Whitney Webb
for,
for TLav.
Ecogenocide
and the Genetically Engineered Mosquito Army.
It's an important one. Share this out as
well. Make sure people can read more about
this.
Now bringing this over into the current conversation
about what's going on in Massachusetts
or specifically,
Plymouth, I believe, outside of Boston.
The idea that they're now beginning to shut
everything down,
curfew wise anyway, at certain points towards, like,
6 PM and eventually be 5 PM because
of the mosquito threat. Now, again, the first
point they made was simply the idea that
we know this is happening.
Right there we should ask whether, you know,
I don't know, maybe dumping a lot of
weird genetically modified mosquitoes across the country might
cause mosquito borne illnesses. I don't know. Right?
Certainly sounds like it's plausible, but nope. Can't
consider that.
Now here
is the article from 4 days ago. Mosquito
spraying to be done in Milford due to
moderate
EEE risk.
Now that is eastern equine I think it's
equine? I say it's encephalitis. Now there's overlaps
to, like, Venezuelan equine, ecephalitis. There's encephal the
main point is the encephalitis. And it's just
different locations of where the same, what they
argue is saying, mosquito borne illness is happening.
And it typically means the swelling of the
brain is understanding what it's let's just look
up the full definition of encephalitis right here.
And it says, the inflammation of the brain
caused by infection or allergic reaction.
So this is 4 days ago. Now the
point I'm gonna get to is the spraying.
My point that I keep highlighting is the
the literal spraying that they're doing
for the the idea of using this to
stop the mosquitoes, I've already gone over this.
And there are so many articles and human
rights groups and anti, you know, like, the
what's the word for it? People that are
pushing back against the pesticides and they use
the the environmental activists
who have been screaming about this because it's
easy to prove that the pesticides they use
are not only super dangerous for you and
your family, and it's being drifted over everything
you do, but it also
is the opposite.
It kills the things that fight the mosquitoes.
And so even if it has an effect
on the mosquitoes in that moment, it actually,
in the long term, increases the population. Now
you could argue that that is an accident,
but you think maybe they might have recognized
that by now because the science shows that,
but no. So it makes you wonder whether
that's not by accident.
So consider that. We'll come back to the
pesticide point in a minute. Now I'm not
gonna go into this as in-depth as I
did in these past shows, because I did,
you know, 2 hours of discussion around these
exact points going through the scientific studies. But
I'll include the shows and give you the
basic breakdown so you can look into it
if you're more concerned about this. This one's
from 2 days ago. High mosquito borne encephalitis
risk prompts Massachusetts town to close parks. Now,
actually, let me see real quickly what this
one I believe this was
for those in the podcast yeah. So it's
also a central Massachusetts
neighboring town, central Massachusetts mosquito control project.
Milford.
I believe that's I I just if you
guys were to look up exactly where Milford
is, I'm trying to give you a good
location overlap. But so this one is specifically,
Plymouth.
Forty miles south of Boston. So all over
we're talking about Massachusetts and the point is
again, high risk
prompts them to close parks. So first they
say, oh, we gotta close the parks down.
Which okay. What's the point of that?
Like, mosquitoes only go around the parks? No.
The idea is they're going, we wanna incentivize
you not to go out to these areas.
Well, this is the kind of action that
became very prominent and this builds into what
we saw more so during COVID 19. Why
wouldn't you just go, hey, guys. You're free
individuals. There's a risk. Take that into consideration.
That's what a free society is
like. Even during the pandemic conversation.
Hey, there's a problem going on. If you
wanna risk it, that's up to you. You
don't get to go, your your actions are
making all of the rest of us unsafe.
That's not how freedom works. Or liberty.
Both of the same things. Right? The point
or in in the same conversation. So when
they started closing down the parks, that should've
be immediately a red flag. And people in
these towns were screwed already up in arms.
No. You're not gonna do that. They did
it anyway.
Now, right now, it's turning into curfews.
Very serious mosquito virus prompts US towns to
close parks. So it's just one more article
getting into the same thing.
Here is what I was telling what I
was saying is,
hold on. I jumped I have these jumped
around.
Here we go. Curfew.
Massachusetts, there's a curfew in these locations. I'll
come back to that. Just so you are
to see that we're getting into the point
where they're literally saying you're not allowed to
go outside.
Everyone should be on guard when those things
start happening right now.
Now here is the conversation we had in
2023.
Obligatory
pesticide spraying in New York City. Now I
think this was Tyler Fisher, I believe, who
played that video in New York City. It
was right outside of his own house. Where
he's like, look at this truck
driving down the street, spraying
right out in the open.
And that it's not it's very common in
fact, and it's pesticides. And I went very
deep on this. And we break this down,
and my point was, the spraying of New
York City, GM mosquitoes, and flying vaccinators. And
the question was, are they all connected? In
my opinion, it's obvious.
That all of these things are different facets
of the same kind of game. Oh, actually,
let me play this real quick before I
forget.
That that's a good point right there to
bring it back into. They're all different facets
of the same scientific
experimentation direction.
Using your environment and your bodies to figure
these things out or maybe just because there's
something else going on. But this is the
point. It's a larger,
multifaceted
type of agenda, which we already saw intersect
with the COVID 19 self spreading vaccine conversation.
Here's that clip you've seen many times.
Since the outbreak of COVID nineteen,
the word virus has been dominating
media headlines as well as our daily lives.
Did you know that one approach that has
been proposed to control virally transmitted diseases is
by releasing a virally transmitted vaccine.
Unlike traditional vaccines,
infectious vaccines do not require any individual consent.
Infectious solutions are also being developed for food
and agriculture.
Infectious
solutions.
That's what they're talking about. And are currently
making their way through the regulatory approval process.
It got shut down, but they did it
anyway because it's still happening. In all these
different facets, that's the point. This is all
part of the same kind of direction, scientifically
speaking, and they're doing it.
That should concern the hell out of all
of us.
Now the point is that these pesticides being
sprayed, as I've gone in I've shown you,
and I'll go over some examples,
are in fact hurt hurt not only hurting
the environment. And the the reality, I went
through explicitly not only the studies talking about
this, but the actual mysterious safety data sheets
of these chemical products and showed you the
the risks, showed you the obvious dangers to
your children, to your animals, to your to
your crops.
But who cares because, you know, the benefits
outweigh the risks. That's that's their mantra. Even
though it's that's not even true.
Because in fact, what we showed is that
this is actually hurting the environment and that
specifically the things that predominantly go after the
mosquitoes. And so over the years, we continue
to see it grow, and a lot of
people spoken out about that.
Right? So then you overlap that with the
GM mosquito conversation, and we'll show you right
now what that means. And that's something that
they've pushed into that. So consider these as
separate facets of this larger conversation. So you've
got the spraying, which actually increases the population.
You got the GM mosquitoes that get used.
And the very core point in that is
that they failed,
or rather
did this on purpose, but they never stopped
doing it.
Because the way they put out GMO mosquitoes,
then they're what the whole idea is that
these mosquitoes are supposed to spread something, that's
the same conversation, mind you, that spreads through
the mosquitoes and causes them not to be
able to reproduce.
The problem is that 15% of them are
shown to not actually die because of the
tetracycline
that ends up in what they use to
trap them. And the point is that that
has caused something that has spiraled back through
the population, which causes them to be resistant
to what they're using.
Even stronger is the point the studies have
made.
So now you've got increasing populations because of
the pesticides. You've got the actual GM mosquitoes
causing these things to become resistant to what
you might use anyway, and they're growing and
getting more stronger and getting more dangerous. And
and not even mentioning what they might be
spreading because of this exact conversation about GM
viruses and what they're spreading to each other.
And then you've got the flying vaccinators conversation,
which adds a whole layer of very dark
and dangerous things that we have been very
worried about.
So the next point
is after that just brief breakdown is to
realize that going back to 2023.
Norfolk County
to begin
helicopter aided mosquito control in Braintree, Massachusetts.
So right there my point is simple. That
if you wanna make this as as a
core a core re the the idea being
that if we know and I'm not asking
you to trust me, please look into the
research around this, that the spraying is actually
causing them in many cases to grow and
then overlapping that with the GM product
that or aspect of it, that causes them
to almost become resistant to what they're trying
to do. And in does the exact opposite
in both cases.
So you can clearly see that not only
the GM mosquito is being released in the
East Coast being a problem, but the idea
that they're spraying to stop it and acting
like this is a it's a compounding problem.
And now going, woah, we've got another problem
with this virus. So it's either by
negligence,
incompetence,
Or this is part of some kind of
manufactured thing? You guys can decide for yourself.
I'm not even saying that's necessarily what I
would lean into. But it's certainly possible.
This is a good one to watch right
here. Feb September 22nd, 2023. Obligatory pesticide spraying
in New York City, g m mosquitoes and
flying vaccinators, are they all connected?
So 2023
and this is just one example. This happens
all the time. Spraying specifically in Massachusetts to
to stop the mosquitoes.
I'll also include this general
search for any these pesticides.
Because we do a lot about this. Just
so you understand, it's not even just about
the fact that it causes the mosquitoes in
many cases to grow in population, but that
it just hurts you all over the place.
Yet another study links lower sperm count with
pesticides in general. US government's toxic pesticide program
seems deliberate
and and that's another different topic. So they
seems their toxic pesticide program seems deliberate. And,
again, I think this is actually directly connected.
Let me grab this one.
Pretty sure because this was on my mind
after this one on September 22nd.
And then I did this one on the
25th because I believe the pesticide conversation was
just on my mind. It was very clear
there's a larger problem here. Yeah. See, this
is them spraying over these areas, and they're
not only destroying the environment,
they're literally causing the exact I've already said
it many times, but it just blows my
mind how obvious this is.
Include that for you. But anyway, so the
the search on the website, which by the
way, don't forget, there's a wealth of knowledge
on the TLab website that goes back a
decade or more. Going up to all sorts
of conversations.
Every time something pops up, search the TLab
site. You'll find is that we've talked about
it many times in long, in-depth,
detailed source material conversation.
R and I gene silencing pesticides and vaccines,
their potential role in the COVID 19 illusion.
Study shows pesticide companies hid developmental neurotoxic data
from EU regulators. And this is what goes
on everywhere. Monsanto paying farmers to use controversial
pesticides. It goes back to 2017.
All over the place.
Now here is a court's article saying and
this is from
where was the date? September
2017.
Swarmed with mosquitoes
after Harvey, Texas calls or after Harvey, Texas
calls in the US Air Force.
To do what? To massively dump to pesticides
in the area. Right? So my and this
is this is in Texas, mind you, so
we're gonna overlap this with the Geo Mosquito
Point. I'm just trying to show you that
all of these locations, the primary locations is,
you know, pretty much the East Coast. We're
talking about
Florida,
specifically. We know in New York, those overlaps.
In California and in Texas, they have provably
released GM Mosquitoes, which my point is, with
that kind of a massive ongoing, continual release
for years, why we wouldn't? And knowing, as
I'm gonna show you next, that that actually
causes them to become resistant and stronger,
that why wouldn't that then populate throughout the
entire country?
So my point in showing you this is
that you'll see the Texas overlap, is they're
doing this everywhere, and it just keeps getting
worse. So here's the point about the g
m mosquito overlap.
Now, I'm glad I did this tweet because
this is like a one stop shop for
like 3 shows combined and the main points.
So it starts here.
A study
from science.com.
This is an important peer reviewed stu study,
excuse me, on one of the most respected
scientific publications.
Study authors, quote, collected mosquitoes
from several neighborhoods before,
during,
and in the 3 months after this trial.
Now realize, right there, and I'm gonna prove
to you this more next, the trial
is an ex is an open experiment on
you and your families using GM Mosquitoes. It's
not even it's not even hidden from you.
I mean, I'll I'll come back to it.
It's right here.
This is this is from 2022, and I'll
show you the ones after that.
Experimental
use permit
amended
for or to allow the release of specifically
the OxyTech
Gates funded
mosquitoes
in Florida and California. The point is they've
amended that. So what they're telling you, this
is an open air experiment
releasing GM mosquitoes. They don't know what it's
gonna do to your family, they're finding out.
And yet, this is an ongoing amendment that
continued all the way up until 2023, and
now I'm gonna prove to you, right up
until 2024 and after.
How is that okay? Did we are we
agreeing with that? Is your is it okay
that your children might get stung with some
kind of a GM mosquito that can do,
well, we don't know yet. We're finding out.
That okay with you? It shouldn't be. It's
wild that anybody thinks that's okay.
But it says, so they studied these mosquitoes
they collected before, during, and a and in
the 3 month period while this was being
focused on, there was an ongoing release happening
and they studied it. They estimate between 5
60%
of the insects
had some DNA from the Oxitec strain. Now,
that's exactly the opposite of what's supposed to
happen. You you understand? They're supposed to be
get this is supposed to kill them off.
The fact that they're finding this in their
DNA means that it's actually proliferating through the
species.
They found the DNA in the Oxitec strain,
that's that's Gates funding, in their genome. And
as much as 13% of the genome in
one case.
So right there, it shows you that this
is the opposite of what and it gets
much clearer than that. Now this says, we
just went over this in our recent show.
Interesting
that we see DNA contamination in the COVID
jobs, as well as DNA contamination in the
geo mosquitoes.
Both utilizing the same genetic manipulation technology. Hashtag
dual use. What do you know?
And that since the science article suddenly added
a paywall, here is an archive. It did.
Right after we did this, there's a paywall
added. Now
this says,
are you aware? This is the point I'm
just making. That the GM mosquitoes released in
California and Florida and elsewhere are an ongoing
experiment.
Are you okay with that? Considering that there's
a provable DNA contamination,
and that between 3 to 15% do not
die,
but actually get stronger.
And this is the the document we just
showed you,
tagging this. But then here is the actual
this is and what's funny is I put
that out, and you get people pushing back,
which rightly so question.
But the point is if you even took
the time to look at what I was
showing, it would be very quickly shown to
you that it's actually true, but I then
followed up and made sure that people actually
saw the point. The actual link to the
study material, the source material, put out by
the people conducting the experiment
proving this point.
Per an Oxitec confidential information document, that was
only released because they were forced to via
FOIA,
they knew
very early that 15% of the mosquitoes actually
did not die, but got stronger, which they
then spread to their offspring that they are
not supposed to be able to have.
So that point is that they're supposed to
give them this thing, which they're supposed to
then kill off the pea the the the
I think it was the males if I
remember correctly. So the point is they wouldn't
be able to procreate. The problem is 15%
of them didn't die. They got stronger. Then
they spread that to the next people, which
makes them stronger. So they make they start
having offspring that are not only stronger, but
in able to withstand whatever they're doing. See,
it's it's like think of it in the
context of like the,
antibiotic resistant conversation. Right? Where they've turned it
it continues to compound and they get stronger.
The point is now we've got things like
this that are
g n like, they got their DNA modification,
they're genetically modified organisms,
and what kind of virus protein aspect are
they spreading amongst themselves that ends up going
in your child's arm? That's never was supposed
to be the way this works, or maybe
it was.
But here's the actual link
to their information. It says this was highlighted
by a difference in results seen between our
laboratory and the collaborator.
They were getting 15%
survival of the transgenic line, and we were
getting 3%.
The point is no matter how you look
at this, there's an amount of mosquitoes that
don't die, so it's inevitable that this problem
was gonna happen. And they hid this from
everybody until somebody finally got a foyer release
and put it out.
Then, you add this aspect to it. Now
don't forget the point that I it's not
stated right there, but it is in this
article, is that the reason this was happening
is that what they were using to draw
them in had tetracycline in it.
It's just a chemical. And the food I
think it was the cat food or whatever
they were using. And that ended up causing
this problem to compound. But weirdly, they never
stopped doing that.
So my point is that we're at this
point now where that it's catheter's back. Too
late. No pun intended.
That that is spread around. They're they're no
matter what they do, they're using the same
dynamic, which like, the point would be if
they shift into something else. Like, how many
times do they get to do this until
we stop them from flooding our our environment
with all these different genetically modified
disease spreading concepts. You know, just to find
out what happens.
Can't believe we're even talking about that. Now
we then get into the conversation about and
I just happen to see this overlap. It
blew my mind.
I talked about this to set October 1,
20 23.
That they were releasing I forget what city
it was in. They were releasing edible
vaccines,
you know, for animals.
They I mean, that's what they was, but
the point is I think it was foxes
or something. Under the idea, they were using
this to stop them from spreading whatever else.
Now this is an early aspect of sort
of a self spreading concept. They would eat
these little packets they dropped. Right? And then
they would supposedly get vaccinated. But my point
is, well, what if they had 14 of
them? Oh, who cares? You know? So who
cares with the animals? But the point is
not just about animals. You're putting these things
out into the world. There are dogs. There
are children. And guess what? In my research,
I found
many examples of a child picking these things
up, a dog picking these things up. How
is it even possible that we allow this?
Well, guess what? That's the thing is we
don't even get involved in the conversation.
It's all for your best interest, we're told.
What I found
out is they had tetracycline in them.
So they're dropping these things in the same
areas they're conducting these experiments, mind you, that
has the very thing in it that actually
makes these mosquitoes not die. You think I
I don't know how that could even be
by accident.
But call me a conspiracy, there's plenty to
do. The point is that these are all
dangerous. These are all experimenting with your lives
and your families based on the idea that
they are I I mean, I how do
we even pretend this is about fighting the
pot mosquito population with where we're currently at
and what we know?
To me, it's one aspect of a much
larger experiment on the human population.
Now, here is just a clip of them
showing you this this dropping of the
edible vaccines. I mean, it's just unreal that
that's even something that's real. And I said
and I've I said this on the October
1st. We'll talk about this in the next
show. I found another aspect of Geo mosquito
topic that relates to air dropped rabies vaccines.
And, also, just that it's absolutely ridiculous and
dangerous made clear directly from the peer reviewed
science as usual.
Packets of vaccines
fell from the skies across East Tennessee today.
This is an ongoing project by state and
federal leaders to cut the cases of rabies
and How did I forget it was Tennessee?
That's crazy. Wild animals.
The disease is preventable, but it can be
deadly in humans. Tennis reporter Caitlin Kinahan joins
us with an effort that targets raccoons. Caitlin?
John, Cruz spent much of the day dropping
vaccine baits all across East Tennessee.
Rabies is rare. There was just one case
of raccoon rabies in East Tennessee in 2021.
One case.
One case, and you're dropping dangerous
edible vaccines all over populate. I mean, guys,
there are there are tons. I mean, get
they climb if you go through my show,
it's clear that they at least put forward
the effort to pop put this in rural
areas, but there are there is endless examples
of animals, people's animals, people's children picking these
things up for for one case of rabies.
Again, basic logic tells you that can't be
the real reason.
But the managers of this program want that
number to be 0.
Wow. At least a milliliter from what I
understand. This is an up close look at
the raccoon rabies
vaccine. The USDA wildlife services
team is loading millions of them into this
little plane. What we use Ask about the
cost.
A million? Do you who do you think
pays for that? Your tax dollars.
Imagine what else that could go to her
towards for one case of rabies.
Unbelievable.
Planes to get a majority of the base
out, and the reason for that is because
we are covering a really large area. On
Thursday afternoon, crews took flight over Cock, Green,
and Hawkins County.
The immediate goal of this project as well
as the the program as a whole is
to prevent the spread of raccoon rabies into
new areas where it doesn't currently exist. The
idea to spread those rabies vaccines by air
took root on the ground. Beginning in the
late 19 nineties, we started this oral rabies
vaccine program.
It is really the most effective way to
manage for and prevent rabies on the landscape.
19 nineties?
Well, good thing it's working. Right? I mean,
I guess the idea that one exists, but
realize that you can go back and I
wish I did in the show and and
look at the number. I mean, it's pretty
much exactly it was always been.
I I frankly don't I think that at
the end of the day, there's I I
already said it. I don't I don't think
this is what it appears to be. Success
on the forest floor propelled vaccine distribution
into the skies. Crews funnel those fishy smelling
vaccine baits to the hungry critters down below.
Yeah. And your dogs will, of course, seek
that out as they're made to attract animals.
They'll bite into them thinking it's, you know,
some other type of alternate food, and then
the vaccine will coat the back of their
throat, and that's how they'll become vaccinated. Yeah.
And, you know, if they eat 14 in
a row, they'll die. But, you know, who
cares? Right? Because the one case of rabies.
Wild idea to get rid of a wild
disease.
By vaccinating these animals, we're creating a barrier.
We're preventing the spread, which thereby reduces the
number of animals that could potentially spread the
disease
into, you know, into households through people's pets
or their livestock.
If your pet dog or cat finds and
eats a bait, don't worry. Federal managers say
they've tested those baits on 60 different species,
and they aren't harmful. And guess what? That's
completely false. Could you surprise, surprise. Now, again,
don't take my word for it. Go through
my show and watch the breakdown. It is
ridiculous.
I found the exact information about exactly what
they were. And guess what? It's dangerous for
animals. It's unreal how these things get I
mean, do you think this woman even looked?
No. They asked them and they said, you're
good. They said, okay. I'll blindly regurgitate what
you said. Great journalism. That's typical stuff from
the corporate media.
Now here again, ask yourself about this is
back to the mosquito concept.
All of this is happening without your do
do we vote for this? What else is
that? I mean, the raccoon aspect. I mean,
you go you can call it something other
than experiment.
But it's clearly dangerous to your environment, to
your families, which, again,
countless examples show.
Here, we have them knowingly using an experimental
amend or permit and amending that going forward
to dump genetically modified mosquitoes in your environment.
That in and of itself should be something
that, you know,
stops the entire process.
Where we go, hold on. We're not okay
with this. Why we're not we're not test
subjects for you. But, yeah, that is how
they see you. Historically, I've never seen a
more obvious example of whether it's admitting they
tested on Americans 200 plus times with biological
and chemical web. I mean, they've admitted these
things over the years. Operation sea spray, they've
always seen you as that. COVID 19,
we don't need to look at anything else.
It's obvious. And here we are right to
this very day, mind you, continuing to be
tested on.
This is the one from 2022,
following review of available data. Now they put
this out like they care what we thought,
but nobody even really knew what was happening.
So they have that moment where you're allowed
to speak up and say something.
Now it says, EPA has approved here here
it is, the experimental use permit.
It's the same kinda dynamic as the experimental
use authorization.
Ask yourself why this needs to be an
experimental per why wouldn't you test this in
a controlled area?
Use animals. Put them in a put them
in a lab. Test it because it's not
about what they're telling you in my opinion.
But here it is for Oxitec Limited.
And remember, I don't actually I don't think
I grabbed that.
I know I've got at least one as
I thought I did. Well, here's Oxitec just
for Bill and Melinda Gates.
So you can see that this is something
I know you guys all know this by
now, but that they invested over, $1,500,000
in specifically working on,
self limited mosquito mosquito
field trials.
Fee that's exactly what this is. Field trials
on your children. Why not? Sounds safe enough,
right? Well, I get the point is we
don't know because it's a test. We'll find
out.
Then it says the original
emergency use permit,
granted all the way back in May 2020,
that's what we're talking about,
Allowed Acutech to field test the use of
the o x five zero three four mosquitoes
in Florida
and Texas.
So, oh, I mean, it's Texas, it's Florida,
it's California, it's again, I don't know how
in the world that would not, over the
last 4 years,
populate across this country with what we just
showed you.
Extends the EUP until April
2024.
As far as I can tell, this is
still currently ongoing.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the 0 X
5034 mosquitoes at reducing mosquito populations,
evaluate.
It's a test using you as a subject.
Oxitec has not reported any adverse effects from
the field tests that have been conducted in
Florida since April 2021. Since April 2021.
A long that's a 3 year field test.
Does that sound like a test? What what's
what
results are you getting? Right? Where where where's
your data? Are you asking people whether they're
sick? Are you finding out whether they've got
a disease? Are they is it even about
you? Or is it a test around things
in the are the mosquitoes themselves and you're
just a a passing ex issue or rather
a
I don't know. A bystander
in the ongoing experiment in your environment. I
just think that's incredible.
Obviously, you can show some issues here because
it's having issues within the mosquito population themselves,
but we don't even wanna ask.
Nobody wants to just like with the COVID
19 injection, because guys, this is the same
technology overlap, they don't want to look at
the side effects. Because it's not about that.
They don't care what's happening to you. Just
like with this, I guarantee you there are
things happening as a result of this, and
we don't even wanna ask. We don't even
want you to look.
Expands the EUP in 4 counties in California.
For the first time in California.
All over the place.
Include this one.
Oh, and that's just what I was showing
you.
Now here is from
few days ago, August 23rd.
State health officials announced risk level changes for
West Nile virus in Massachusetts.
Weird. All seems to be focused in this
location. What's going on?
Right? I mean, I it is it what
what's the logic around all of a sudden?
Like, certainly something might come up that makes
it make sense, like always.
But I'm beginning to sense something very strange
around this. In this focused location,
and in in area that has been overwhelmed
with g m mosquitoes.
And spraying.
Right? And the flying back. All these overlapping
conversations have similar or in in the same
direction effects.
Now Oxford,
in Massachusetts, has now approved a curfew to
prevent this thing.
Now the point is the people in the
community are up in arms. They're here standing
up going, you can't do this. You can't
shut it, like, for I guess what the
main point some of them are making is
it'll destroy their their,
youth athletics. Because they're saying it's a curfew
after 6 PM. So there's not gonna be
football games, any baseball, they're gonna shut it
all down. Which it is flirting with a
very similar feeling from the COVID 19 lockdowns.
And they're not having it, but guess what?
The government doesn't care. One of the points
they're saying is, like, we've got a petition.
Got 100 of signatures saying you can't do
this. They don't care. That they don't ever
care about that. That's a that's a useless
action to make them think like, the same
thing with the comment period.
I made this point in California a long
time ago with senator Pan, his lunacy about
injections, where they put up this comment period
and said, give us your thoughts. And I
swear it was thousands of parents lined up
to say, we won't we don't want this.
This is wrong. You can't do this. And
I there was maybe a 100 people that
spoke up in in favor of it. It
passed immediately.
They don't care. They do not care. This
is to make it look like they're engaging
with the public. That's my opinion.
But look at the history. It's obvious.
Now hold on. I I think that there
was a point I was gonna make.
Make sure I didn't forget something.
It was this one.
Nah. I forget. Now, so going forward,
this is what they're putting out from corporate
media. Massachusetts health officials are advising residents to
stay indoors and imposing a 6 PM curfew
on outdoor activities until at least October after
detecting a human case.
A case.
Like, I just don't even know how this
logically makes sense from anybody's perspective.
Like, I guess they they what they're trying
to make it seem like is, you know,
we failed before even though we pretend it's
success in every other context, so we have
to be ahead of the game this time.
We have to jump up and is not
what you want from us to be on
it? To be and be getting ahead of
the problem? Well, no. It's not about you
removing our freedom or not acknowledging our freedom.
The point is simply tell people what's going
on. Allow them to make their own choices
without coercion. That's all anybody's asking for. Frankly,
from my perspective, I don't even care. I
don't even wanna hear what you have to
say. That's my personal opinion. But at the
end of the day, to begin to shut
people's lives, all that shows you is they
think they have that right. They do not.
No matter what we've seen, whatever what precedence
you think or been said, they don't have
the right to simply go you're not allowed
out of your house.
I I'm sure people disagree with that. But
this is what we have to understand as
core,
not just values, but rights.
Now there's a lot of these clips flying
around. I thought I might have had oh,
I do have that clip here.
Oxford, Massachusetts
and 3 neighboring towns have a reason for
concern as mosquitoes carrying a potentially deadly virus
called eastern equine encephalitis
or triple e and affected a resident who
is now fighting for his life. We don't
wanna see another human case of triple e
this year. The rare but dangerous disease can
cause swelling in the brain. There's no treatment,
and anyone can get infected. The death rate
is as high as 30%.
Even if you do survive,
usually, there are long
term significant health impacts, neurological
impacts.
Oxford has been declared a critical risk for
Triple E prompting health department officials to recommend
a 6 PM curfew for outdoor activities,
including club sports.
These are recommendations.
They're not hard and stop requirements.
We are definitely nervous about it. Sarah Fornier
is also worried her children's sports seasons,
football, and cheer could be jeopardized,
but they're taking precautions by wearing mosquito repellent
and long sleeve tops. We can't stop. Like
Which by the way, mosquito repellent is super
bad for you. Like like like sunscreen and
everything else they tell you is for your
benefit. Now re they realize they're saying it's
obviously not it's recommendation. But what else do
you remember they claim was just recommended? The
same thing happened before. Now I'm not trying
to over hype the current reality. I just
want you to have the tools to understand
what this is if it does go any
further. But realizing that it's the same thing
they did before. I mean, they're still pretending
they never force shots on anybody. Like, it's
ridiculous the way they play these games. Are
we gonna pretend that there's not gonna be
some pressure of local authorities going, hey. Get
inside. You might get sick. Like, the we
already saw this go to go on in
many other dynamics. So I'm concerned about how
this is setting even just the idea of
kind of pay the pressure around it
concerns me. They need to get out there
and play.
This is their time to be social with
their friends
and and be a part of a team.
Now triple e triple e symptoms usually begin
between 4 to 10 days after being bitten
by Right. And they're
interestingly very similar to what you might expect,
Which is another point to make, is how
this might just be called something else. But
realize what they told you.
One case. So we're back in the same
dynamic. Baby well, so we got one case.
We don't want there to be any more.
So think about the possible downside to what
they're doing, whether it's societal issues,
right, or the idea of what they're gonna
be doing to stop us spraying and everything
else based on one case.
And we'll get into what the what it
shows doesn't even seem to be like, the
argument is it can be deadly and problematic,
but the idea at the end of the
day is the overlapping risk in reality. The
likelihood of you getting bit, likelihood of if
you do, that will translate, likelihood of if
that does then happen, that it might be
deadly. The overall reality is it's ultimately a
low risk.
Now, you I'm not a doctor. Make up
your own decisions about what you're gonna do
with your
life outside of your house. But at the
end of the day,
it's very clear to me that this is
a wild overreaction, no matter objectively.
So to me, that's a big red flag
about what act what else is really going
on here. You guys can decide for yourselves.
Now this is where I think This is
an interesting overlap to this.
Now this is a Wikipedia page for
Eastern Equine Encephalitis which is the main name,
e e e.
Here's what it says on the Wikipedia page.
EEE was first recognized in Massachusetts
in 18/31.
Now, I don't even know exactly what I
think that means, but I find that really
odd
of what's the likelihood that it just so
happens to be the focal point of the
conversation. In fact, it it was first recognized
anywhere ever in 18/31 in Massachusetts. I just
find that be I don't know. That just
seems odd to me. It says when 75
horses
died mysteriously of viral encephalitis.
So now we're talking about some kind of
an overlap, like an animal jump species thing.
Like, I mean, everything about this just I
don't know. Not even exactly sure why I
just something just just, you know, as always,
question everything. Seems really odd. In Florida,
again, Florida
is one of the primary locations of the
GM mosquito released areas.
About 1 in 2 human cases are reported
a year. Okay. So then we start asking
that question. If it's more, we have more
cases happening in Florida than in Massachusetts even
though that's the focal point now. Like, there's
something to ask there. Like, why is this
happening there? And overall, the point being, we
know that there's an overlap in the East
Coast in general for the things that might
end up causing these things to be problems.
It says in years in which conditions are
favorable for the disease, the number of equine
cases over 200.
Now we're talking about 1 to 2
human cases a year in a general sense.
Does that sound like
in any way something that we should be
responding like this to?
Under this it says signs and symptoms. Symptoms
include,
surprise surprise,
fever, muscle pain,
altered mental states, headache,
meningeal
irritation,
photophobia, seizures. Like, so basically,
all of these things could be overlapped with,
you know,
COVID 19 vaccine injection.
That's the reality, but whatever we call COVID
19. Or just all the side effects of
the injections, which is actually a real point.
So in continually, these are something we could
consider whether it's just like
I honestly don't even think they have to
do that anymore. There are so many catchalls
out there already. Like,
what's it called? The
infant sudden the sudden death syndrome. I'm I'm
blanking on the term. Anyway, the point is
that it's it's it's basically a catchall for
we don't know. And yet they diagnose people
with we don't know how they died. That's
how dumb that is.
Sudden infant death syndrome, SIDS.
So the same kind of idea, my point
is that they they that's what we know
they've done.
Lumping things into something else when it's usual.
That that's been going on long before COVID
19 illusion.
My point simply is, I just don't like
how easily this could be overlapped. Down here,
it says prevention. The d's the the disease
can be prevented in horses with the use
of, guess what, vaccinations.
So I was just worried about how that
could fill a role here. And it says
for humans, no vaccine is available.
Okay.
So if we if we, and it's a
big if, if we start seeing a conversation
about how they're gonna rapidly develop an injection
to to meet this problem,
there's my biggest red flag.
Right now, it's just preventative. We're just giving
information to understand, one, why this is a
problem in any sense that's hurting your environment,
your family's health.
But having the tools to be able to
push back if this grows,
that would be the point right there that
would really show me that this is going
into something else.
And I think, honestly, they're gonna start doing
that with everything. Just the MRA platform direction.
But it says that under treatment,
about 4% of humans known to be infected
develop symptoms. So on top of everything else,
only 4% even develop symptoms, which arguably then
means that you would ultimately get sick. 4%.
That's what this is really? And it says
with a total of about 6 cases per
year in the entire country.
I just oh, we should laugh at how
silly that is, quite frankly.
Down here under biological weapon, and this is
where it gets more interesting.
EEEV
was one of the more than a dozen
and this is the same thing. Encephalitis overlap
is more of a more than a dozen
agents
that the United States researched as a potential
biological weapon before the nation suspended its biological
weapons program. What do you know about that?
A few years before signing it and then
ratifying it, which by the way, they never
stopped even doing it and you could easily
prove that. I mean, it's it's embarrassing. It's
like it's like Netanyahu pretending they don't have
nuclear weapons. We know that they're still doing
this. It's obvious. They call it vaccine research.
And I'm not even talking about that in
the sense that everything vaccine research is biological
weapon research. You could make an argument there.
My point is that it's easy to prove
that the
gain of function, or EPPPP,
or whatever they're calling it, yet that is
what this is.
So the point is,
just make a note that this exact point
was
studied by the US government as possibly being
a biological weapon.
I would think that's very relevant to this
conversation.
So let's look into that.
Oh, this is just those points so I
don't miss it.
Here is a study from January 2024.
Study reveals clues on how eastern equine encephalitis
virus invades brain cells. Now first, I just
think it's interesting that the now it's it's
brain swelling. Right? But this weird overlap of,
like, invasively bra blood brain barrier, invasive brain
com the same thing happened all throughout the
COVID conversation. And, you know, there is a
common overlap there with how these things tend
to work, but I don't know. With the
whole Lieber Langer overlap and all this technology,
something weird there feels, I don't know, worthy
of notation that all these things seem to
be invasively
invasive brain cells conversations. But the only point
I wanna pluck out of this, same thing
as we're just talking about. Certain aspects this
article notes and again, this was from the
Washington University Medicine website.
It says,
certain aspects of its biology
give eastern equine encephalitis virus the potential to
be weaponized,
making it particularly
important to find a way to protect against
it.
And guess what? That's the setup. You know,
you know, in subsequent experiments,
in which the mice were infected
by inhalation,
as would happen if the virus were aerosolized
and used as a bioweapon,
the decoy made from the first two domains
was still effective, reducing the mice's chance by
a death of 70%. So whatever. The point
is, what they just told you there, and
I'll give you the studies after this to
prove it, they weaponized
it. They took this thing in 2024
and they weaponized it, aerosolized it to see
what would happen. And, you know, that that's
the point they make with everything. Well, making
it important to find out how to protect
against it. You know, assuming that the 1
in a 1000000000 chance the exact thing you
made turns out to be what actually happens
organically. You know, as the the lie and
illusion around gain of function we always point
out.
But just think about how crazy that is.
That in 2024, this Washington University study is
telling you, whether in a lab or not,
they took the thing they're currently telling you
is blowing up around
Massachusetts,
or rather, not really blowing up, but this
they worry as it might,
that they just aerosolized
infected mice with to see what would happen.
That is the core of all of these
problems that we keep highlighting. Now this could
just be an overlapping coincidence.
But I think it's worth of no worth
noting.
Here is a bore overview of the Venezuelan
equine encephalitis.
And that's the v e e v. Right?
So there's all the the the main point
is either equine encephalitis and the just different
locations and the similar points.
Now it says,
this issue, e v e e v, can
cause a spectrum of disease from mild febrile
flu like illness or severe or fatal encephalitis,
which I think just the the flu like
overlap is always important. Then it says, look
at this. V e e v was developed
as a biological weapon by the United States
and this former Soviet Union, of which the
US absorbed a lot of the the ongoing
research and programs.
During the cold war, it is a classify
it is classified as a bio safety level
3 by the centers of the by the
CDC
and is a category b priority pathogen by
the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
Laboratory accidents have been reported
with infectious
with infections occurring from small volume
aerosolized samples.
I mean, I'm not seeing I mean, okay.
This could just be the fact that this
is you'll find these earmarks
everywhere because they're all ridiculous and dangerous and
irresponsible.
But is this not, like, exactly what we
see if we look back through the COVID
19 development conversation? I mean, this is the
same thing. They're working on aerosolizing and weaponizing
this thing, you know, just to find out
how to protect against it. And they even
tell you we had a couple of leaks.
Oops. We got out one time or 2,
and you know, some infections, but it's okay.
Or maybe not.
Maybe that's not what happened. Maybe it ended
up becoming a I don't know. But I
think this is absolutely ludicrous, that this is
how this is going on. Doesn't that scare
you that in the background right now, you've
got a bunch of mad scientists like Fauci
tooling with these things, and then just, oopsie,
got out our shoe, which by the way
is an actual story from Fort Detrick.
Trash cans and shoes bringing out very dangerous
things. Oops.
Well, this is from 2023.
I just, I mean, I'm kinda blown away
by how, and I'm just, you know, briefly
doing research into the overview of these things.
Oh, and this was that, in case I
missed it. Oh, and then here's an overview
from NIH. We're showing you that back in
2019, when they were kinda floating this conversation
already, that they said back in 2019 that
this specific thing was posing an emergent threat.
Why?
Why? There's 1 or 2 cases a year.
What is the threat?
Maybe the this is about predictive programming. I
don't know. Building it in your mind because
it's gonna become something. Just hypothetical.
But I just don't understand the logic of
why this is building right now. Unless it
is for something else.
Now this is the same thing, just a
thread so you can search the current information
going around around this point.
And oh, and the oh, and the points
about the bioweapon conversation around it. And one
more thing to add to this in general
is that I just it may not be
connected. But right now, there's also hyping
August 21st, a current dengue outbreak.
And I thought the point I think there
was one point that was interesting in here.
Maybe we oh, did it go away? Yeah.
I think so.
It simply said, locally acquired dengue cases have
been detected in, guess what?
Florida,
Texas, California.
Gotta be a coincidence. Right? Maybe maybe. Who
knows?
But I think that's very interesting. Also, Hawaii
and Arizona, the point is that this is
an interesting overlap.
Do everything every one of these things has
direct ties back to what they've been doing.
Doesn't mean that that's the exact cause.
But you can make connections here, and I'm
worried about what that shows us and just
if this is just another direction of their
same program. And frankly, I know it is.
We just proved to you that this exact
g m overlap is the same thing in
other directions of the science,
and I just worry about why that's not
I I you know, you get it. Where
this goes.
Here's is a couple of last things I'll
include on this segment before we get into
monkeypox in general, or I think, before that,
a quick point about the polio aspect.
2023.
A deployable mosquito tech
that can execute,
incapacitate,
or vaccinate.
That's literally this is peer reviewed science, and
it goes over it overlaps with the flying
vaccinator's conversation. And the point was that they
investigated
whether they can use the same GM Mosquito
technology
to use as weapons, to use as in
to to incapacitate somebody, or to vaccinate them
should they decide to.
Look at it for all as always, guys,
for those who don't know or new to
the show, every single thing I'm discussing will
always be linked below in the show, all
in in chronological order so you can look
at all the links we have. The point
is that this is scientifically back, they've done
this, they've researched it, and they're showing you.
We can use it like this. And yet,
it's conspiracy theory to all the big time
adult people in the room. Right?
And then this is a great clip that
Brock put out from one of these shows,
toxic geo mosquitoes and other dangerous patents.
Check it out. Now, one other quick point
before the polio thing is that I just
thought this was interesting.
Ginkgo Bioworks. So we've mentioned many times on
this show and in different interviews and different
work on articles from Derek and Whitney,
has been awarded, this is August 27th,
$93,700,000.
A CDC contract for a traveler based
genomic surveillance
program. Now, where did we just hear that?
Did we just hear that conversation coming from,
you know, Trump and Kamala and the biometric
overlapping g and it's all it's a biometric
discussion as well as a well, even just
biometric itself overlaps with your biometric identification, like
fingerprints and ident and your irises. But this
is about specifically genome surveillance. So overlapping that
with DNA surveillance and internal it's it's all
part of a larger technocratic,
internally invasive control structure.
And so our point my point is showing
you that this is a problem that's already
been there, and this overlaps with all the
usual suspects along Trump's side, along Kamala's side,
along Gates and everybody else.
And this is somebody who just highlights that.
This is, you know, Bill Gates investor, and
the point is yes. Here is an article
we put up, and I'll show you these
right here.
Well, actually first, here's the actual contracts, if
you wanna look into it further. Traveler based
genomics surveillance program.
Health and human services, CDC.
August 26th.
Ginkgo BioWorks.
$93,000,000.
It's crazy.
I I mean, is this, is this, mean,
this is what's interesting, is we always pretend
we like to, you know, fantasize about how
we're somehow a democracy, even if we want
a mob rule democracy as opposed to a
republic. But either way, I don't think any
of those things are what we are anymore,
if we ever were.
The point is, do do we ask for
these? Do we want this? Is this what
Americans want? I think it's pretty easy to
show they don't. Like, by and large. But
as always, the government says, we know what's
best for you. Let's pretend like that's you
voting for what we say, but we're telling
you you're gonna get this, so shut up.
Because we need to monitor you because you're
a risk to us, because that's really what
this is about.
Surveillance.
Now here's an article from Derek, from 2021.
Who is Ginkgo Bioworks and how do they
fit into the biosecurity transhumanist
agenda?
It's an important
article. Over this overlaps with basically everyone we've
been discussing.
And then here's an interview Derek and I
did about this. Ginkgo Bioworks and the future
of bioengineered
healthcare. So the fact that this is all
of a sudden kinda quietly in the background
getting a $93,000,000
contract from your government,
all of it, to surveil you and your
genomic information
while they're also talking about biometric control and
surveillance, all under some other narrative about immigration
or whatever else. We're goose stepping into this
control structure if we're not paying attention.
Now point is there's a lot of aspects
of this driving the rational like, why some
people go, we need something like this. Because
that would be whether it's about the idea
of surveilling these things in a worldwide sense
to avoid pandemics, that's what they want you
to think, or it's about immediate information about
you internally,
The point is that things like this are
already being used. And realizing that we know,
and this is for the podcast, is the
polio discussion in Gaza, which has been verifiably
manufactured and driven.
People are going, wait. Look. We need stuff
like this to fight things like that.
Even though they're hurting these people on purpose.
Now Sarah Wilkinson puts up a great article.
Polio, Israel's dirty bioweapon is bringing Gaza to
its knees. So this stuff is active around
the world right now. Polio,
vaccine derived, which is the truth.
A dirty Israeli bio weapon to bring Gaza
to its knees, spreading deadly diseases will bring
us victory, says Israeli general. That is exact
same thing that Robert highlighted in his article.
Israel's deliberately causing the spread of infectious disease
in Gaza. They've publicly said, the the this
is good. This will help us. And that
you can show that they have taken action
to make this happen. Don't forget, Eric Prince,
who is seemingly gonna be part of Trump's
whole thing, at least that's what the some
people have floated, hasn't happened yet,
is the perp he's taking credit for the
idea and it seems to be the case
that he gave them the technology to flood
the area. Why'd they do this? Because it's
spreading disease.
It's very easy to see. The game is
about the tunnels. The reality is about clearly
causing what we're seeing. I'm at this point
right in the beginning, the moment that happened.
I I said, look. It's not raining like
we've seen before, and yet the streets are
all flooded. They're making this happen to get
them sick. And boom. What do you know?
That's just what I saw. I gave you
my thoughts as usual.
The point is,
manufactured.
And she's right about the ole the oral
polio point. I have it up here in
the straight in a second. This is all
the the whatever we're dealing with here is
an oral polio vav vaccine derived strain that
they're using. It's, what do you call that,
but a bioweapon?
Here's the article. Israel's dirty bioweapon is bringing
Gaza to its knees. It's a good article,
make sure you read it.
Derek's or, Robert's article on this. Now here's
a here's a point that Luigi Daniel is
pointing out and this is coming from a
a caption he shared where it says, a
way to win the war faster and at
lower cost for us requires a system collapse
on the other side and not the mere
killing of more of us fighters. The intentional
community the international community warns us of a
humanitarian disaster in Gaza and of severe epidemics.
We must not shy away from this as
difficult as that may be. After all, severe
epidemics in the south of Gaza Strip will
bring victory closer and reduce casualties among IDF
soldiers. That's what that's what Wilkerson and Robert
are referencing.
That's a direct statement coming from a general
in the Israeli military. It says with polio
starting its spread in Gaza after being eradicated
25 years ago, whatever you think about the
reality of that. It says causing
severe epidemics proposed as a legitimate and necessary
means of warfare.
That's that's war crime stuff, guys.
Undeniable.
Broken Truth adds an interesting layer to this.
He says this just in. The FDA suddenly
lost the files
documenting
gain of function research on specifically s v
40.
A lot of overlap around that through the
HIV conversation. Doctor Mikovitz put this forward and
also showing up in the COVID 19 injection
conversation
because these things are not part of something
separate.
He says the tumor causing virus that, guess
what, is in the polio vaccine, which put
in 98,000,000
doses in the United States.
And guess what? He asked them for a
request for the information.
Oops. Guess we lost it.
Radiation enhancement
of the s v forty transformation
in 3 t 3 and human cells.
Yeah. They're literally
using gated function to experiment on the thing
that now oopsie. Now it's getting people to
say, this can't stop happening.
Or rather, it doesn't stop happening. And we
nope. It just doesn't it seems as if
there's an
far too many people
who act like
they're, you know, they look at this stuff
and say conspiracy theory that are just allowing
this to continue.
Out of just
a lack of understanding or just a desire
to or you know, I think that people
just are invested in their control structure because
it benefits them. But we need to see
how these things are being used.
Mikovitz was screaming about this the moment the
COVID 19 illusion started.
It says then this is his reply he
got. It says, this is our reply to
your recent inquiry
received in this office, October 24, 2022, regarding
obtaining a digital copy of the file you've
cited below, which you can see right there.
Radiation of enhancement of s p 40. And
it says, in regards to your inquiry, we
regret to inform you that the that although
this con this collection has a majority of
its original files oops.
It says there are also many missing files
including this one. Oops.
Right? They just accidentally misplaced that digital file.
Right? That makes sense. You know, the the
documented page in your website and your, that's
just you don't just misplace those things, guys.
Somebody deleted this.
That's the only way that makes sense.
File on not available online.
This is crazy to me. And I think
what that shows you is that there there
very well may be something building here. And
hiding the the paper trail around working on
these very things, and showing you an overlap
to this that goes right that goes right
back to the covid 19 injection con conversation.
Now, but oh, I forgot to remove this
actually. So I I forget what this was.
I just I I guess on a side
note, here we go. Here's sends Twitter continuing
to censor platforms
or people. It was somebody commenting on this
conversation.
Commenting on the idea of polio and and
bio weapons and it's gone now. Now I
tried to load this on the Wayback Machine,
which both of them had examples, but neither
of them showed up. That's not Wayback Machine
doing that. That's whoever like, we keep seeing
this with outside influence, with Israel or somebody
else, forcing the Wayback Machine to remove content
and you they may be complicit in it.
The point is that Twitter has done something
where they're most of the when they want
to,
they're the even the way back machine shows
up like this. No matter how long you
keep it there, no matter how many times
you refresh it, it doesn't show you even
though if you go back to the page,
it it does have an ex it shows
you that it's there.
Like on the or it shows you the
different days and shows you that there's a
file. But nope, don't get to see it.
Anyway, I once got deleted, I just forgot.
That's what these are.
Now, here's an overlap I thought interesting as
you might have seen. This is from the
Guardian 13 years ago. Oh, that okay. So
that's what it was now. I remember now.
So that he was pointing out this point
about the overlap of the of basically Afghanistan
or really specifically the CIA and and and,
Osama Bin Laden. And using the justification
of giving polio vaccines
to get in, take biometric information and DNA
stuff, and and eventually go after someone in
lawn or at least the narrative. Right?
But the interesting part about this is after
that, guess what? You saw an explosion in
polio in these locations.
You could argue that was by design or
that just they just gave them the things
to get them in the way and those
things got them sick, which by the way
we know.
It's not up for debate, guys. The oral
polio
conversation is a very prominent one.
New polio outbreak in the Sudan caused by
oral vaccine according to United Nations.
2020.
This is this is Bill Gates' discussion or,
like, the GMO conversation that failed and they're
more food secure insecure than ever. Oral polio
vaccines that actually give them polio. I mean,
how many times do we let these maniacs
work with their genetically modified games like the
insect allies conversation that they put before we
recognize this is not what it appears to
be?
Well, the point is we all recognize that.
Your supposed leaders just don't care.
All of them. Every side of them.
So the point is, here's the article going
back, showing you that this was something that
happened. CIA organized a fake vaccination drive to
get Osama bin Laden's family DNA.
That's a real thing, guys.
Here's what it says. The World Oil Organization
has rejected Pakistan's
claim
UN agencies were involved in a CIA fake
vaccination program to trace Osama bin Laden. And
it says the Global Health Agency recently warned
that polio has reemerged
as a public health crisis. Pakistan is particularly
badly affected as one of the 3 countries
where the virus is endemic.
Right. Okay. So you went to Pakistan
to do this
under a guise of giving
polio vaccines and did so.
And then all of a sudden, there's an
outbreak of polio in in Afghanistan. I mean,
rather, there's Pakistan. Which is what happened.
And ever since, it seems to have been
a problem in these locations.
Now you could argue that this is just
not connected, but I find that pretty interesting.
Here is the same thing under Wikipedia.
CIA transnational health and economic activities. Never. The
Guardian is going or rather the WHO is
going, we categorically
deny that we had it's true. It's in
the point is it's a 13 year old
13 year old article,
and and it's been basically admitted by now.
So just recognize that even then, you've got
the
WHO going, we we reject that claim.
Too late. Now we know it's true. So
just when you hear the WHO lying today,
ask yourself why or recognize that it's possible.
Now down here it says, some of the
humanitarian efforts by the CIA have been accused
of being false or all of them, or
merely as a means to get information using
the aid workers. Ask you to mean look.
Israel does the same thing. A CIA polio
vaccination program in Pakistan
came under fire after it's revealed the CIA
used the program to get Osama bin Laden.
There you go. Now, that's not because Wikipedia
says so, it's because it's true.
Again, oral polio, they're the ones in many
cases, behind why this happened. There's And we're
just gonna trust the next thing they put
out. Right? No.
Now here's the numbers from Pakistan. As of
2022, Pakistan reported 20 polio cases. A slight
increase from 1. The point is, pretty much
everywhere else we're told that it's been eradicated.
Funny how the location where they did that,
it's not.
You guys can decide for yourselves.
Now here is an article from UNICEF, October
18, 2021.
House to house polio vaccination set to recommence
across
Afghanistan. Oh, and that was I just I
closed the page, but Afghanistan
and
Pakistan are locations where this has not been
it's not gone away. And you could prove
that both those locations have been recipients of
their polio vaccines.
It's not about anti anything, just pointing out
facts. And that's what's funny how these facts
tend to become anti something when you don't
like what those facts show.
Now,
quick points about
the
I guess, and specifically
as I as my opinion again is that
I think Trump is the selection for the
next discussion. And make it clear, I think
Kamala is just as dangerous. I think they're
all just as crazy and just as authoritarian
and terroristic. But at the end of the
day, I believe that Trump is clearly the
winner right now and whether it's momentum or
the fact that he's the one that's been
selected, my opinion. So my point is these
what these next points are to show you
that
he and and RFK are framed as the
counter, like, we're against this direction, but I'm
gonna prove to you that he's not if
you're just paying attention. But then also recognizing
a couple of the dangerous points about just
broadly the COVID injections before we finish with
the monkeypox
focal point of where this might go next,
up for you to decide. But yet again
yeah. I know you just played just showed
it yesterday, but here's Donald Trump openly telling
you that the things that are absolutely
beyond question,
deadly across the board for everybody,
He says they're good in saving people.
People have died under COVID this year, by
the way, under Joe Biden Right. Than under
you. And more people took the vaccine this
year, so people are questioning how Oh, no.
The vaccine work, but Yeah. Some people aren't
telling you. The ones the ones that get
very sick and go to the hospital are
the ones that don't take their vaccine. Incorrect.
But it's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected.
Nope. Do you think he doesn't know that,
guys? You really think he's that uninformed
With all the conversations and mow all of
his bass saying otherwise, if so, what a
great choice.
If not, you should be very concerned about
why he's lying and convincing people that might
otherwise take him at his word that they
should give their children this very dangerous thing.
I just don't know how anybody can make
sense of that.
Look, the results of the vaccine are very
good. And it You get the point. So
here is David Ike.
This person points out Trump's most recent speech
addressed the possible return of lockdowns
and mandates,
and calling out the fear mongering and manipulation
attempts ahead of the 2024 election. Regardless of
if you're on Trump, it says it's refreshing
to see someone with significant influence calling out
this nonsense. Well, yeah. It's it's it's nice
to see them say these things,
But I don't get why people I mean,
I do get why it's TeamSport politics, but
that can't be everybody. There are people that
seem to go, look. Look. He said the
thing we like. Okay. Well, couldn't can't you
stand back and go, well, let's wait and
see if it happens.
Right?
Like, Ross Albright or any number of things.
Like, they can say a lot of things.
And the point is that as we've seen
both with left and right, all that happens
is that they come into power
and then they go, well, here's the narrative
around why that doesn't make sense anymore. And
all the people that are on board, no
matter what he says because the teams who
are positive go, oh, you're wrong. We chose
not to because it's the right thing to
do or whatever the narrative is. As Whitney
just put his tweet out saying, how long
until digital IDs and biometric surveillance becomes rationalized
by the right
because they are convinced or
or
or engineered into rationalizing it, like with the
save ID converse, save act conversation.
It's the same thing that's happening right now
with all these different overlaps. The idea of
Palantir and spying and biometric
biotechnology
overlaps. That is Teal and Vance and all
of them, Elon Musk.
And yet we go, Well, because they're the
good guys. That's her point. How long until
the next phase of the push that they're
all getting tricked into is suddenly going, Well,
you're you're crazy for thinking that the biometric
surveillance is somehow against us. It's all stopping
the bad immigrants.
I'm not for me it's not about the
narrative, it's about the actual function.
I used to believe that people were fighting
a function of surveillance and invasive biotechnology,
but apparently only if it's being presented by
the left or whatever. That's the frustration for
people like us that are seeing through all
of it. At least as I think. I
believe I see it.
So the problem
is when he stands up and goes back.
Lockdown's bad. These mandates, wrong. We all people
go, yes. That's he's the one. Well, what
happens when it doesn't actually happen? What happens
when he comes out and goes, guys, this
is a real outbreak. This is a real
problem, and I'm doing it for your safety.
You think his followers won't immediately follow suit?
Because they bought in. They believe that he's
the right guy. They believe he wouldn't lie
to them. Like, they actually know this person.
That's just embarrassing that people do this anymore.
I hope you're right. I believe you're wrong.
The problem
is that there's a 1,000 different ways that
this is just to get you to believe
in him. But in any case, I'll just
read to you what I sure I think
I have the clip. Yeah. It's right here.
Doing lunatics are trying very hard to bring
back COVID lockdowns and mandates with all of
their
sudden fear mongering
about the new variants that are coming.
Yeah. And guess what? All of those people
he just mentioned are all funded by the
same people funding him.
It's not a joke. Literally, every one of
them are funded by Israel just like he
is.
But they're all crazy, and they're the bad.
They're the lunatic bad. Oh, but, you know,
to them, it doesn't matter. We'll fund everybody
because that's the whole point.
Whiz. You know what else is coming? An
election.
They wanna restart the COVID hysteria so they
can justify more lockdowns, more censorship.
All of which you began, though, but I
guess we'll forget about that. More illegal drop
boxes, more mail in ballots, and 1,000,000,000,000 of
dollars in payoffs to their political allies heading
into
the 2024
election. Does it Funny how we mentioned political
payoffs when that's what you're all getting, a
$100,000,000,000
from Mary Madelson and APAC funding and all
the rest. That's only the ones that you
don't like about what they do. Right? You're
all the same, bud. You're all the same.
The problem
is the idea of, like, the voting aspect.
Now, yes, I look, I'm the first I
will openly, as I've many times, talk about
the like, I often point out pastas work
in other countries around the world, showing you
that the system we have is ridiculous. Like,
intentionally overcomplicated
and broken.
But that is, of course, if you think
your vote actually translates anymore, which you think
is embarrassingly not the case. But either way,
that's my point about saying these talking points.
All I care about is what he did
when he was president and what he does
next,
not what he says he's gonna do. Did
he lock her up? Did he end the
fed? Did he give you the information about
JFK? As Whitney pointed out, there's a big
difference between released and unredacted.
No. But guess what? It doesn't matter because
he's our guy. Right?
That sound familiar? These are bad people. These
are sick people we're dealing with. Yeah. And
they're all funded by the same people funding
you. But to every COVID tyrant who wants
to take away our freedom,
hear these words, we will not comply.
I just think it's hilarious. I was just
like and remember when he said in the
beginning, the the the solution will not be
worse than the problem. He really has a
way of fixating in on what people are
saying
and turning it into his mantra.
He's good. He's very tactful in that way.
But the point is, what happened then? Well,
guess what? The solution was literally the problem.
And he still lies about that. So when
he says, we will not comply, maybe we
shouldn't turn that into you must comply because
narrative. Because that's what it seems to happen
later when he actually comes into action.
So don't even think about it. We will
not shut down our schools. We will not
accept your lockdowns.
We will not abide by your mask mandates,
and we will not tolerate your vaccine mandates.
Good. I hope he's I hope he needs
it. Literally, I mean, there's no reason anybody
should disagree with that, but the problem is
whether it actually happens.
And I know people really wanna believe that
he's different. He's but I I what I'm
trying to hope people see is that they're
he's just one playing card in this on
this massive government deck. That's all it is.
And they're these are it's like I mean,
right now, in them frame themselves as, like,
the the justice league and I mean, guys,
they're pandering to you like you're 6 years
old.
It's it's it's embarrassing. And I'm just all
I'm trying to do is show people that
these people, through their actions and track records
and statements and history, are not what they're
pretending to be right now.
I I I know that's not fun. I
know that's not exciting. I know that's not
what you wanna hear. But it is the
truth, as I see it.
Here's what David Icke says.
For goodness sake, people, he sanctioned COVID lockdowns.
He tells you
what he thinks you want to hear. Same
with Harris and her potential voters.
Different rhetoric, same
masters. The quote, boy George Bush,
quote, there's an old saying in Tennessee. I
know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee, that
says, fool me once. Shame on shame on
you. Fool me. You can't fool me, get
in. That's he literally said that by the
way. It's so stupid. That's the point how
someone like that ever became president. He is
a lackey.
People voted for him as well, he says.
Exactly the point.
Now, Dana McAdams
shows you something else. Here's a more recent
statement from Trump. So here he is going,
we won't take your mask dunkdowns and your
mandates. So if you're only playing the game
where it only becomes a problem when you
say you have a mandate
versus allowing the build up of the same
control structure, then you might be missing the
bigger picture.
His point is,
he still points back at the ventilators,
the masks that they created,
as being some sort of a success.
I just don't even understand. Like, I mean,
the the only rational argument at or even
only one I seem to get from somebody
wanting to acknowledge this is that he's saying
these things just to get you to think
this or it's 4 d chess, or he's
doing that to trick them so he gets
x y and z. None of which acknowledges
that he actually did those things and he
actually means these things and you can see
it based on everything he still does.
I think it's alarming to me. So the
point is here, he's praising these things and
Daniel McAdams says, I'm starting to believe that
Trump really does want to lose the election.
Either that he is
so out of touch with his base that
he does not deserve to win. Either way,
this campaign is becoming a train wreck. He's
praising ventilators,
like the ones that killed several of my
family members who otherwise would be live would
be alive. Gee, thanks, Donald.
You realize the ventilator part of it was
one of the most undeniable aspects.
Almost everybody, the vast majority, up in the
90 percentile of people who were getting ventilated
were dying.
Doctor Rydell blew the whistle on this. We
are not treating what we think we are.
He was very clear about this, and they
kept doing it. And then they gave him
remdesivir that made it even more likely to
happen even though we know it's deadly. The
point is that these things were the core
of the problem outside of the injection.
And here he is
asking you to praise him for it.
We never really got the credit we deserved
for that with the
ventilate
ventilators and all of the different things that
we did, the outfits, a lot of things.
We were we were producing in New Hampshire
in different places, masks. We had mask factories
opening.
Yay. Thanks, Trump. Because masks work. Right? And
they're helpful? No.
There there are very clear aspects where those
things are useful. But what you're dead what
you're saying is you using the Defense Production
Act, which is martial law for production,
you you've coerced entities into producing masks
that we didn't need, that were actually hurting
people. In fact, which is part of the
reason why the illusion spread.
But, yeah, but let's just pretend like that's,
you know, whatever. 40 chest. Just whatever helps
you ignore that.
That's alarming to me.
And here,
are just is just one of the most
easy to see
byproducts
of that dangerous choice. Microplastics
are infiltrating brain tissue. Again, there's that interesting
overlap. Studies show there's nowhere left untouched.
That's August 2024.
That's so it's like glyphosate. Too late. It's
literally everywhere. It's it's in your body right
now.
And that's it's not just masks, understand? There's
a there's a very clear plastic problem in
all this that people like Trump are clearly
ignoring because they're into big business versus everything
else, which I guarantee is gonna be a
problem for RFK supporters.
But either way,
it is a problem and it is hurting
you. And this gets into endocrine disrupting chemicals,
this gets into all immune system suppression,
all of this overlaps.
And here's another example. This is from
March 6, 2024.
Scientists found tiny nano plastics in people's arteries.
Their presence was tied to a higher risk
of heart disease. And the whole point is
almost all of these are tied back to
the conversation
of this,
masks.
During the COVID mask mandate I've shown you
this exact image. Right? This was this was
during the COVID 19 illusion I was showing
you this.
During this whole mandate mandate era, a
129,000,000,000
disposable masks were thrown away every month. And
I made the point then, by and large,
by the very people that were screaming about
how we're ruining the environment.
And then they wore 35 masks and 10
pairs of gloves every day because
you're helping I I just this is the
same point on the other side. Just like
we're talking about with the right right now.
That was how the left got played. They're
screaming about the environment and here they are
destroying the environment because narrative. It's amazing that
anybody can fall for these kind of things,
but this is what we're trying to do.
We're trying to get ahead of this right
now.
An estimated
3,000,000,000
masks
that take 450
years to biodegrade,
now pollute the oceans. And yet, this is
overlooked by many politicians and so called environmentalists.
It's just depressing.
And there's a study down there by the
way, so we as always, James Melville is
doing a good job. Showing you the the
actual evidence of what he's saying. Now this
is very interesting. Oh, Derek adds this as
well. Does you guys remember this?
January 19, 2021.
Today, president Donald Trump awarded presidential commendations to
the below individuals
in recognition for their exceptional efforts on Operation
Warp Speed.
General Milley,
secretary Alex Azar, Jared Kushner,
Mansef Salaoui, general Gustav
Perna, Deborah fur Birx, Anthony Fauci.
Yeah. He gave them a presidential commendation for
their amazing work in giving you injections that
kill your children.
And he still prays this to this very
day.
I'm just I'm blown away that anybody out
there pretends this is not exactly what it
looks like. Now, here's a a good example
that I mean, I just wanted to include
this somewhere that were these are the injections
that he's telling you are okay to take.
Now what's interesting to me, this is a
new study
that appears to have already been removed.
It's just gone. Not even, like, redacted, it's
removed.
I find that to be very interesting. Let
me show you what this says.
This is an important study from,
was it ijvtpr.com?
Which is the International Journal of Vaccine Theory,
Practice, and Research.
Self time or excuse me. Real time self
assembly
of,
stereo microscopically
visible artificial constructions in incubated specimens of mRNA
products, mainly from Pfizer and Moderna. A comprehensive
longitudinal study. Now, you know, as always, take
this with a grain of salt. Like, if
we're you know, what's interesting is if we're
willing to go, I don't trust doctors anymore.
I don't trust science anymore, which is never
the that it's that's a little bit of
an overreaction. We should consider everything, question everything.
My point though is that it's weird how
a study comes out that says something that
we think don't align with, and now it's
easy to go, well, they're all liars and
scientists don't mind. But then if a study
comes out that aligns with what we do
think, it's like, there it is. There's the
evidence. And I find that to be a
little bit of a dishonest stance, right? We
have to engage with everything honestly
just because you know, whether it challenges our
views or not. So be skeptical of this
like you would of anything else because it's
also going through the same spheres of of
people and conversation.
But this is actually pretty important because of
all we've seen, like, the overlap. The con
the the going back to things like the
Graphene oxide conversation or going back to things
like,
in Japan,
multiple studies showing they found, like, black metal
aspects in these injections. That was publicly put
out by the Japanese government. But, you know,
it gets disputed as fake news because no
one wants to acknowledge these things. Here's what
this says in the study and what they
found. In addition to cellular toxicity
oh, shoot. Damn it.
I know where it was. It's right here.
In
addition to cellular toxicity,
our findings reveal numerous.
On the order of 3 to 4 times
10 to the 6 power per mill mill
milliliter of the injectable, it's incredible,
visible artificial self assembling
entities
ranging from 1
to 100,
microns. I believe that's what they've got. Mic
microns.
Or greater
of of many different shapes. Now that's, like,
microscopic.
It says there are animated worm like entities,
discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right angle structures containing
other artificial entities within them, and so forth.
Now you've heard this come up a lot.
Right? This conversation has come up many times.
And I will be the first to argue
that some of these are coming from people
with unverifiable claims that are far more like
99% of the injection is Graphene Oxide, as
we saw in the beginning,
mhmm, p supeter types of the world, that
I think were designed to scare you away
from possible realities like this. I genuinely think
that. Right in the beginning, our first conversation
about this was how what first came out
seemed
overrepresented
or rather based on a lot of subjective
things. And what Whitney and I both said
in the interview was this seems like something
that is very plausible. And in fact, there's
evidence to suggest that it's the future of
what they tell you they're working on.
So I my thought at the end of
that very show was this might be done
to hide that. And yet it got misrepresented
by people claiming we were saying it wasn't
real because that's always what happens. There are
people with vested interest in going after you
for whatever reason, like, happening right now despite
what I literally said in that conversation. And
I stand by that now. I think that
you you it's not hard to look up.
I've there's, like, 45 different peer reviewed studies
I have saved that literally say graphene oxide
is gonna be the next vaccination
hero. And yet we can't factor in like
they might have done it without our knowledge.
Now, again, the evidence, as far as I
can tell,
ultimately comes down to showing that there was
an example of Graphene oxide in the actual
trial, but it was a residual overlap from
one of the things they used in the
test. But I think it was,
expose
did a great job showing
that it proved that that right there in
the actual study admitted there was a residual
residue.
So right there, without question, there is a
residual residue of Graphene oxide in the injection.
They said that in the Pfizer data. But
that does not mean that it's what they're
claiming, but it could
it could that could also be a lie.
Maybe they're misrepresented. So that's that's the objective,
honest way to cover that. My point now
this study and again, this one is
where was it?
Just trying to give you the, breakdown. So
Young
Lee
dang it. Where is it?
The date and everything else. I don't know.
I can't almost go forward. The point is
about the debt, the information. But any case,
the point is that with stuff like this,
we just have to get into considering whether
this might be more prominent than we were
told. I mean, they lied about Dan and
everything, didn't they?
Now continuing,
it says all of these
are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels
of contamination of the COVID 19 injectables.
And incubation studies revealed the progressive self assembly,
that's like the graphene oxide overlap, of many
artificial structures.
As time progressed during incubation, simple 1 and
2 dimensional structures
over 2 or 3 weeks became more complex
in shapes and size. Now Whitney and I
have talked about this. She did articles on
this. Of the self assembling nanotubes,
the in vivo platforms, these were all these
were all DARPA projects.
So again, it's it's not even up for
debate that these things aren't real. It's whether
or not they were in that thing they
gave you is the question.
And now this is suggesting yes. And it's
saying, developing into stereo,
scopial what is that? How do you pronounce
that? Stereos
scopical.
Oh, that's interesting. Never even seen that before.
Scopical.
Stereoscopical
visible entities in 3 dimensions.
Let's see what that means.
That means
relating to or denoting a process by which
2 photographs of the same object taken at
slightly different angles are viewed together. Yeah. It
might be missed in you know, anyway. It
it means something probably different in the scientific
study in which it's being shown.
And says,
they resembled carbon nanotube filaments,
ribbons, and tapes. Some appearing as transparent,
thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals
and beaded chains. Some of these seem to
appear and then disappear over time.
Our observations suggest the presence of some kind
of nanotechnology
in the COVID 19 injectables.
This is terrifying.
It really is. If this this if based
on everything else we see, it's very clear
that this is not just possible, it's likely.
So we need to continue to look into
this, and highlight what we see next.
Because at this point, it's that that ship
has sailed, guys. Half the world has these
things in their body. So what this then
becomes is what we should be asking. But
just make sure people see this stuff. Make
sure they know that this is out there.
Now, David Ick just put this out on
27th. And this is He's referencing,
what was it?
This
article,
scientists control minds using switches in the brain,
world's first. Now this is 4 weeks ago.
Now realize that it's not really the world's
first. We've talked about this Lieber Langer in
in research, the overlap, but specifically Charles Lieber
in this case. Well, I I take it
back. They're both in different avenues of this
working on how they can use magno genetics,
elect optogenetics,
different things to
using light sources or magnets, something like that
to to influence
or control
how you think.
Now I guess I should grab this since
This is Let's see, what was it?
This one, and I'll grab the actual article
too.
So we've talked about this a lot. This
is a Guardian article going back to, you
know, 8 years ago. Genetically modified
genetically engineered magneto protein remotely controls brain and
behavior. Now this was this came from a
Rockefeller Institute study, I believe, and they they
did this on mice. They literally proved that
they could control them. Like, literally control them.
And this goes into the discussion of whether
it's more than just your actions. And they
make this case.
It feelings and thoughts. And you even going
to the point of, like, whether they can
control your insulin levels and use that to
kill you, use that to drive your actions.
I mean, guys, it's all on the record.
And I broke this down in this discussion.
Bio digital convergence, COVID magnetogenetic
ferritin vaccines, and big spikes in mass vaccine
areas. Now the point here is that they
have many different covid overlap,
ferritin vaccines, which is the point of this.
It's the ferritin,
basically
iron
containing ferritin proteins that exist already. They can
influence them because there's iron in them. Using
these different overlaps and use that to actually
manipulate your body. It's terrifying stuff. This goes
back 8 years ago.
Now, we've got all sorts of different overlaps.
There's universal ferritin nano and nanotechnology
injections for the flu. They're all some of
them are already, like, basically in the world.
Like, not just studies, but being beginning to
be used. That worries me.
Now back to his point. 4 weeks ago,
scientists control minds using switches in the brain.
Here's what he says about that. Exactly what
I have said in the is the plan
through the connection between the cloud and self
replicating nanotechnology
in the COVID jabs.
And that just think about that, what we
just read. Now think about who's out there
trying to push the idea of this kind
of technology.
Well, a combination of people like Elon Musk,
Peter Thiel, like, all these different overlaps of
using this direction
of
influencing or invasively in like, the idea of
whether it's a neural link or whether it's,
like, the stuff I've talked about, Lieber and
Langer. This is a very long term and
very clear agenda of the power structure.
And he's telling you, this is the plan.
Using this connection to you with the self
replicating technology that might already be in your
body. It says the electromagnetic cloud is being
created by 5g4g
towers,
with 6g7g
to come, and the low orbit satellites of
Musk and others. It says this is the
mass mind control AI connection to the human
brain, a hive mind,
that I have been warning about in the
books for decades.
Everyone loves to dismiss this stuff as he
just go
scientifically speaking, all of this is actually happening
yet to be pieced together.
Musk's Neuralink technology says, which requires a piece
of the skull to be removed for wires
to be connected, is a calculated diversion to
sell a fake cutting edge. Exactly what I'm
saying. Same thing I say when they hold
these big clunky things and go, this is
the new breaking chip.
No. It's not. You guys have had self
nanotech smart dust for, fucking, 10 20 years.
I've made many shows about this. And guys,
this is not my opinion.
I think it's called smart I mean, I
may bring that up too. It's called smart
dust, I believe.
Oh, this is actually a good show I'll
include.
No. It's called anyway, there's a company. I
think it was smart something Dust Dust Techno.
But the point is I covered it in
in all these shows, and this goes back
a decade or more. And they're openly discussing
the idea that they've already been testing this
for training routes. So what and it's on
the actual website. They show him spreading things
in the air. Like, it is literally the
case. Nanotechnology,
smart dust that you can't even see, the
size of dust that we spread in the
air and we use that to do all
sorts of things.
If they've been doing that for a decade
I mean, we can only imagine what's actually
going on right now, and that's what this
show is about. Is smart dust already in
the use of the population? The answer is
yes. And was COVID 19 an attempted experimental
next step? It seems plausible.
To his point,
this is how the AI human connection is
really being done. Remember, the technology in the
public arena is light years behind what they're
actually doing in secret. That's always the case.
Historically, you can prove it to yourself. Look
back at how long it took for them
to admit what they were doing for 20
years before that, or even longer.
I'm very concerned about where this goes.
Include these for you, and then we'll
finish with some monkeypox conversation about how this
might very well be the next push to
drive you into this direction. Oh, actually I
was gonna play this too. Hold on. Let
me save these articles.
Inversion isn't put this out. And again, it's
it's I just find this fascinating. I still
don't know whether I feel like this might
have been another effort to hide the bigger
picture, or may have just been an example
of how it's actually being shown.
But he goes back to make this case.
Because listen, considering what David Ick just said,
considering what,
that study was saying about nanotech in the
injection,
Can now consider what he says here. And
when this and even when this was going
around,
there was no reason to be so dismissive
about this with the overlap of what they
were telling you was the future of this
stuff. Magnetogenetics.
He says, which which explains oh, and he's
highlighting this first, this study, which we talked
about. The talk doctor the McCullough Foundation put
this out.
And it's doc showing you all these different
images of what they say they're finding. Be
skeptical, but don't dismiss them.
And he says, in this video of a
woman, which I'll show you next, he says,
which explains this magnet phenomenon
that people called him schizo for believing back
when they first rolled out. I'd like an
apology, please, he says. They use a small
portion of the vaccine. This is his opinion,
by the way. I'm not even sure if
I agree, but consider it. They use a
small portion of the vaccinated as guinea pigs
for some sick and twisted DARPA program that
is basically techno wall techno, technological possession.
Considering what we know and again, it seems
like what Eike is saying. Considering what we
know they did during MK Ultra with human
experimentation, which by the way, if you don't
know, is super dark. It's way more than
just mind control. And advanced mind control tech,
why is this reality so hard to believe
for some people?
Now think through the full scape
scope,
imp full scape in implications of this being
a reality.
If this technology exists
and is advanced as they brag about in
being their own papers and nanotech conferences,
then you better believe
that intelligence agencies and the technocratic elite breakaway
civilization, Colt,
now has the capability of capturing
any person in a position of influence and
power and steer their behavior and decision making
of their will. Don't forget that article I
showed you from the UK.
Right at the beginning, they put out this
whole thing about how there might be mental,
you know, like, like, it might be mentally
unstable due to the injection kind of a
conversation. Like, that was what was kinda floated.
So it's kind of set there where the
should they need to looking back, they can
say, oh, well, you're compromised. Because and that
may have been an effort to get ahead
of this. I don't know.
But it says, one minute, they're leading a
grassroots populist movement against the powers that be.
Then they walk into a room and get
dusted or injected with something by the CIA,
and now they're someone else entirely. That may
sound ridiculous, but, guys, like, it's not that
Farfetch'd.
We're I mean, all of this adds up
with what they're telling. You know, one possibility
is that all this is all fake.
I've I've listened to people I respect that
would argue that, like, nanotech, for example, are
it is more so a hype that they're
still trying to reach. Certainly possible.
But it says, and also guess what country
has been investing billions into advancing nanotech research
and is at the forefront of it. Israel,
which is very true.
You have no idea how bad things really
are, he says. Now watch watch this video,
just to draw you back to this. Now
you can decide for yourself. I'm not saying
I even necessarily
know for sure. But I do find it
interesting how quickly this got thrown away.
Thing. I would like a gentleman
with me
at my place.
That's just one.
Oh, wait. We forgot about this one.
I'll do it for all 3 of you.
K.
Hold on.
What else did we have? We had then
we just have a key.
Oh, for scissors.
What's wrong with me?
You've seen that before? No.
Come feel it. It has a pull.
What is it? It pulls. Like, he felt
that.
So does it stick on
both sides.
When you take it off and you go
to put it on,
you can't feel nothing.
Just to jump ahead to save time, she
tries multiple times, and it keeps sliding off,
and she keeps going. Oh, actually, I'm a
little play because I think she makes a
comment about her husband. I just try to
save time. So we can get no. But
she she eventually makes it happen, so you'll
see.
Sometimes you have to turn it around like
it it resists. You try to keep first.
Because when I was first watching this, I'm
like, okay. Maybe she's lying about it. But,
you know, watch the watch the nurse reaction
at the end.
It's, like, right under where you're just here.
I can feel it.
Something wrong with me. If you tell my
husband, so I'm videoing it so he'll see
it. He's like, you're you're just doing it
to yourself. I'm like, no. Other people can
do it to me. And by the way,
I do I
fully believe that happened. That there were people
out there that were lying about it, that
were convincing
themselves with things that just stuck to their
arm because they were sweaty or whatever. Right?
But on top of that, I did see
some of these that were very difficult to
dismiss. But I kinda left it up in
the air because they've just there are so
much more important things to talk about, but
it's very strange. And now with this circling
back around, I just think it's important to
consider that this might be part of a
larger thing. And experimentation on populations is just
like, that that might as well be number
1 for you at for governments around the
world.
I mean, you could literally see it right
there. It just jumped out of her hand.
See?
Okay. What is in you? Is he The
kid can't or the nurse just said, okay.
What's in you? She just said that. You
know? So it's just it's just fascinating to
me. And That's what I'm saying. If you
touch my skin, is there anything on my
skin?
Is there anything on the scissors?
No. What does n mean?
That's scary. Tell my husband.
His name is Brock.
Brock, your wife is magnetic. I'm an alien.
He says your wife is magnetic. Not funny
though, for real. You guys, it's a dream?
It's a dreamer? No. This,
It's crazy. And again, there's so many of
these going around. Right? And so the point
is with what we're saying now, it's really
not this I mean, the thing is my
opinion is that whether or not you were
literally were proving this explicitly,
there will be people that will dismiss it
anyway. Just because they've been trained to do
that. Oh, that's the thing we were told
is fake, so I'm gonna go ahead and
ignore it. Like, that's just how people are.
That's my opinion. That's the 2 party paradigm.
That's what they do.
Interesting point though. Right?
Consider all these things because I think these
are all very valid things to consider in
what in all of this. Now, to finish
this in general oh, actually, I forgot a
couple more points. Alright. We're gonna get to
the monkeypox no matter what. I'm not gonna
end the show. But let let's I wanna
include this part as well. This is the
same segment then for Kameh has put this
out. So showing you that this is not
going away. And, I mean, you all know
this, especially this audience, guys. You know.
The m r a platform is a inst
it's it's a fixation, it's a fixture.
Not left or right, but your government.
As always, that's the point you need to
recognize. Narrative over here. Narrative over there. But
what happens?
All of the things keep going. All of
the mRNA direction, they're all keeping work they're
all still working on. They're all still pushing
forward. They began in Trump's administration. They're continuing
to buy Biden's. They're gonna continue in Trump's.
That's how this will work, despite the narratives.
Here she is telling you this. This is
some random little show trying to, in a
c you know, some kind of,
you know,
casual way, tell you these things are hip
and new and fun, and mRNA is gonna
be the thing of the future. Like, that's
just all they do.
But listen to the lies that are put
forward and the misinformation
this is spreading. As Kamas says, for our
mRNA vaccines, COVID was just the beginning. MRNA
vaccines stopped the COVID pandemic. This is what
they're saying in its tracks. Now they're poised
to help us against the flu, rabies, cancer,
and more. Here's the full video of them
fawning over the platform. And here it is
right here.
RNA vaccines changed the course of the COVID
19 pandemic and saved countless millions of lives.
That's what Trump likes to say, but it's
pretty easily proven to be false. Then they
just dusted off their hands said, my work
here is done and rode off into the
sunset. Never to be heard from again. Kidding.
Nice. Obviously. The success of mRNA vaccines against
COVID 19 marks a sea change in how
we approach like health care. Except for the
fact that Fauci wrote an entire article about
how the thing failed, but I guess we'll
just ignore that and keep driving into the
experimentation. At least the diseases part. MRNA vaccines
worked once, and that means they have the
potential to keep working. Okay. Okay. So ask
you yourself this. If you're the one out
there going, oh, well, Trump's saying that for
alter ulterior motives. Okay. Well, how about the
fact that she just watched Trump go, they're
saving people. And she goes, hey. They've worked.
They've saved people. Okay. You know, who's a
liar in this conversation?
Well, they're both telling you a lie. Just
because you think Trump's got a reason for
it or you you give him the benefit
of the doubt, doesn't change the fact that
they're both lying to you. They're both telling
you they all work. But what's funny is
if a republican that we're talking about in
the teams who are politics watches this clip,
what are they gonna do? Oh, the democrats
and their and their vaccines. They're lying to
you. Trump says it, they go, oh, he's
got a reason.
How do we not see that? And guess
what? It's the same damn thing for Kamala
supporters or Biden or anybody else that pretends
that she's not a ridiculous cartoon of a
person. That she's the most inspiring person in
the world because they were told to think
that yesterday.
This is your 2 party paradigm. Again and
again and again and again. Here's why we
think mRNA vaccines are here to stay from
your yearly flu shot to cancer and beyond.
DNA may be the information that life is
based on, but it requires proteins to execute
that code. MRNA stands for messenger RNA, and
it's a bit of genetic information that acts
as a middleman between the 2. Since your
cells don't want to make every single protein
every single time, they make mRNA as like
a TLDR just for the proteins you need.
Yeah. She's talking about organic
m r mRNA, messenger RNA in your in
your body. Not we're not talking about the
mod RNA which is what we're people are
putting in their bodies. N1 methylpseuduarine
modified RNA that is the reason in part
that these are dangerous for you. They've already
shown. That is the reason that they did
this so this would last and it wouldn't
go away right away and that's why it
doesn't just stay in your arm and that's
why it continues to make more. It's and
everything about this is shown to be dangerous
from every possible angle, from the actual mod
RNA to the spike protein itself, to the
platform, to the lipid nanoparticles.
Every angle of this in its own way
is shown to be toxic for you. And
yet, it's a success.
And this is a neat little function to
exploit for vaccines. We've covered the nitty gritty
of how mRNA vaccines work in earlier episodes.
So if you're curious, you can check that
out. But for now, here's the TLDR. In
general, traditional vaccines deliver proteins from bad germs
called pathogens into your body, or they deliver
a killed or weakened version of the germ,
weakened version of the germ,
etcetera. The idea is to introduce the real
pathogens proteins to get your immune system to
recognize the bad guy. But mRNA vaccines don't
give you any of the actual virus.
All they do is deliver a little bit
of mRNA that codes for a viral protein.
Does that seems I don't how is that
even
well, I leave that a lie. I guess
the point is that they're telling you they've
they've because they have. They've engineered this. So
technically, I guess, my thought was gonna say
is that it seems like it does have
a part of it, but at the end
of the day, it's simply the instructions for
your body to create the same thing.
So, leave that alone. But the point you're
gonna get to next is what I think
is most important,
which is that
you just told us that you trained your
body to make the thing that your body
is supposed to attack. Now the the logic,
if you call it that, is supposed to
be that you do this and your body
then learns
to fight it. But we've already proven that's
not true. We've shown that this is not
the case.
What's happening, by and large, in a lot
of different multifaceted ways under this umbrella, is
self self attack. Your body is attacking itself.
It's the autoimmunity, it's the immunosuppression,
it is damn near everything we're talking about.
Because you're you're putting this in your body
and saying, make a cytotoxic psych protein. That
your body goes, that's dangerous and attacks your
body. And what's producing that? Your body. And
it's it's it's obvious. On top of that,
it makes a lot of them, which means
that your body continues to make more so
toxic and because the whole game was it
was supposed to make one of them. It's
not the reality. Because of the animal methylsutouridine
modified RNA. And many other thing, possible arguably
probably by design. But I think that's important
to consider.
You're ultimately and now on top of that,
the bigger point is that you're pretending that
you can give yourself a shot
with multiple aspects of that.
So here's a shot, and your body suddenly
makes 3 different kinds of proteins.
Well, you know what can happen when that
happens? We've reached I mean, there's so I've
still have pretty much all of these
just ready and lined up because I've, you
know, there's all these videos off to the
side. But they told you this
many many different times. That Fauci said this
in the beginning,
so did plenty of other scientists. I thought
I still had it right here.
Essentially, the idea was, yeah, right here. Here's
one of them. That if you give yourself
the wrong
protein,
then it could be very dangerous.
Okay. So that's that's you're all all play
Fauci saying that. But then the game is,
well, here's an injection that gives you a
couple different kinds. So by default, one of
them has to be the wrong one. Right?
But we just don't connect those logical dots.
Right?
They're trying to train the body's immune system
to target the right part of the virus
because getting it wrong can be dangerous.
We know that historically
with coronaviruses,
that if you do vaccinate with the wrong
kind of vaccine, for instance, in domestic cats
who have a similar viral infection,
that you can make the disease more severe.
There's another element to safety,
and that is if you vaccinate someone
and they make an antibody response
and then they get exposed
and infected,
does the response that you induce
actually enhance the infection
and make it worse?
And the only way you'll know that
is if you do an extended study,
not in a normal volunteer
who has no risk of infection,
but in people who are out there in
a risk situation.
Right. And that's what they did to you.
They used you in the world to do
this, or at least that's what happened whether
that was the design or not. And what
and that what did you say? So you
give somebody with an injection that has the
whatever might be the one you're supposed to
make, but then also has other one. Those
are your bivalent, your multivalent.
Multiple proteins. Or how about you just take
the one shot and it gives you the
protein that's not actually what you're fighting? The
point is this has the very clear potential
to lead to pathogenic priming, antibody dependent enhancement.
Very easy to see.
I I I'm not a scientist. I'm not
a doctor. But I can very clearly connect
these dots. That's what the reality is. We're
watching people die from it. I just wanna
make sure we understand how clear this is,
and they're all just going forward. And here's
a ridiculous cartoon video telling you why it's
gonna save your life. Then your cell's natural
protein making machines can go to work. Then
the cell can present the finished pathogen protein
to the immune system, so the immune system
knows who to beat up. And this is
a huge advantage because making mRNA is easier,
faster, and more flexible than growing a pathogen
in a lab, which is what's required for
more traditional vaccine approaches. As long as we
know the genetic sequence for the target protein,
making the corresponding mRNA is basically the world's
easiest cipher. There you go. So simple. 123.
Right? And that's the game they're talking about
for we don't have to do safety testing
anymore. We've already, they claim,
convinced you of the safety of the platform.
Right?
Well, no. They're murdering people, but the game
isn't as anyway. So shut up. And so
the game of the platform's great. So going
forward,
we just need to pump in the new
protein.
Right? That's what they're doing.
I mean, they they they we've jumped from
this idea where Fauci literally said, for never
go 4 years for a study. Now we're
happening in months. Because, well, this is the
mRNA direction.
Nobody seems to care about that within the
power structure that we're literally pushing forward as
something based on the idea of what we
just saw killed millions of people.
Maybe that's by design.
Now, I'll leave that there. You get the
point from this. We'll come back to
go back to the larger the main point
to finish, but I'll also include these
dual use, new aerosolized mRNA delivering nanoparticles can
vaccinate or they can eliminate. Now think about
the one we just talked about. The same
conversation we're just overlapping with. This is another
dimension of this. Where we're now at the
element of mRNA delivering nanoparticles that can be
aerosolized, that ultimately can be shown to do
any number of things. This is your GMO
aspect. This is your insect allies discussion. It's
all the same things. They're all the same
elements of the same type of thing being
experimented on in your world.
They can do this to deliver some kind
of protein or they can make it have
an insulin spike and they can kill you.
You know? And that's what the science says
in a peer reviewed study.
Here's another one from 2024.
Gain of function's newest brain virus.
And it's on the read it for yourself.
It's something that they were experimenting on that
caused this new thing. And genetically engineered proteins
to control everything.
That's what we just talked about. Now we're
not just delivering a protein in regard to
whatever they tell you they're gonna deal with,
but
engineered proteins, like the ferret nanoparticle injections that
can literally be used to control whatever they
want. And again, guys, these are not my
hypothetical points. These are coming from peer reviewed
scientific studies where these people who are working
on this are saying, this is the future.
And then the high minded journalists of the
world pretend like you're a child because they
don't know that and they're they know you
know, this is the game where it's politics
right now, it's a 2 party illusion, acting
like people highlighting that you're giving 2 choices
of the the here's Coke and Pepsi, and
we're like, well that's a ridiculous thing. That's
not the real choice. Then, well you're black
pilled.
No. We're just the actual we're we're seeing
through what you just per you don't want
to see. Same thing anywhere else. Now of
course I could be wrong, but to to
pretend that we're somehow,
you know,
that's almost like projection. It's the exact opposite
in many cases in the cons in this
context. Here's Stephanie Seneff and Denny Rancourt in
a round table we had, telling you this
is much broader than just the injection itself.
She her point was that glyphosate,
acts like a primer. And glyphosate is literally
drenched the world.
It's everywhere. I've made this point so many
times, and it's not it's scientifically backed. You'll
find it damn near everywhere. It's in the
clothes you're wearing. It's everywhere.
And that's kinda the thing we're trying to
get ahead of for what they're doing now.
This is what we've already been experimented on.
It's super dangerous for you. And it's also
an endocrine disrupting chemical. And apparently, it also
primes you for whatever the mRNA was doing
to your body according to Stephanie Senf, PhD.
Despite proteins destroying your body.
I forget why I had this included, but
I'll just it just this is just the
breakdown from the Moderna vaccine showing you this,
but I I forget why I had it
included. I think it was might have been
from her video, but we'll skip it for
today.
And then here, this is the I'll just
include it. One of the articles we put
out on our substack about what is the
difference between mRNA and mod RNA. Something which
they don't really address in that conversation of
the cartoon video. The reality being that it's
dangerous. It's an experimental entity of something something
that they've done that was never used before
in the context of sin going into people's
bodies around the world and it has caused
the problems.
Now they're just shifting to something else. Not
addressing the fact that they experimented on everybody
and killed a lot of people in a
lot of different ways. M one methylpseudouridine
mod m one methylpseudouridine
modified RNA is what it is. It's not
mRNA.
Anybody saying mRNA is simply misrepresenting the reality.
At best, it's mod RNA. That's what you
would call it.
Watch the whole thing. It's a quick breakdown
for one of my shows.
Now, Alan Martin makes a good point about
this where remember that conversation between Trump and
and Elon that all the followers, Sykka fans,
completely it's a lot of he's like, this
is the best they've ever seen, and it
was a really clumsy and heartless new conversation.
Alan says, the people overwhelmingly want to know
why president Trump still thinks the mRNA shots
were good vaccines.
Those shots killed my little girl and killed
and injured millions of others. Despite he plan
the plan he speaks seeking justice, does does
he plan on seeking justice for the injured
and bereaved?
I mean, seems like that would matter. Right?
Now I'd shared this, but I well, this
I did this to see him have, like,
basically little engagement before that.
He says, this is my comment in the
Trump space last night. It was seen over
15,000
times. And analytics
say it has 41 replies.
I can see 2 of them.
This is free speech everyone is so worked
up about?
60. Well, look at that.
I see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
See his point, guys?
I know you do. You're on you're here
because you know already.
We're being censored
by people on Twitter, by Elon, by Yacarino,
and everybody else in the sphere that's clearly
controlling a lot of different conversations. So if
you're only of the mind that, well, it's
Israel. No. No. It's about everything. That they
don't this is about social engineering.
But the what and we see this all
over. This is about Donald Trump criticism and
about the injection and a valid point. He's
going, what about the thing that's killing people
that he keeps saying good things about? Nobody
wants to address that. Sixty people responded and
you don't get to see any of them.
Free speech.
Now, lastly, I just on this segment before
we finish with monkeypox. I thought this was
interesting.
This is a one day ago. Why you
might not want to rush to get the
new COVID vaccine. That's just interesting. I rarely
see things like that pushed out, but if
you read into it, it's kind of more
of a wait, there might be something better
coming. Right? But nonetheless, I've rarely seen them
go don't do it. I don't know what
that means. Maybe probably nothing. Probably almost just
to make you think they're not pushing it.
But either way, I thought I'd include it.
Because
I guess really my mind was more so
going that this might be not the like
I said before, I find it really hard
to believe that it's gonna be another COVID
2.0.
Like, literally. That it will be something else
as opposed to a COVID conversation. I just
find it hard to believe they would go
right back to that.
But they seem to be pretty clumsy in
other ways. But either way, consider where this
goes. Now let's finish
with this conversation. Now, I already made points
about this.
Now, there's some things I really do wanna
go into today. But overall,
I I just wanna give you an update
on where this is at, and I wanna
I I I'm of the mind that this,
just like other conversations we've had,
has all the hallmarks of where this could
be used.
But I kinda don't get the sense I
mean, well, I I we'll have to wait
and see how it builds.
And I I guess I I guess what
I'm saying is I don't think this is
necessarily what is, like, the decided idea. It
might just be one of many things in
their tool belt they might want to use.
But at the end of the day,
like last time, it's already happened. There's already
been an emergency declared. It's already been brought
back. There's already been, you know, I just
don't see that it is there yet, but
it might be one aspect of
it. We'll go through it and you'll see
what I mean. But, nonetheless, worthy of conversation.
So I'm not saying we shouldn't be looking
at this. Just don't overhype it. I worry
that people out there are almost doing their
job for them in some cases.
So here he is saying,
global monkey pox emergency. I don't think I
even grabbed the clip.
Oh, wait. What was this one?
Oh, okay. That's for that's coming up next.
It's the clip I have down below. Yeah.
So I don't have this clip. It's not
worthless. Dude, he's just saying that they advised
me to do this and we did it.
So
health
emergency of international concern. That's the same kind
of thing they do every time. Now right
there, that seems ridiculous to me, obviously. Based
on the same kind of thing they do
with the rabies and everything else. One case.
Right now, there is, in my opinion, not
even remotely reason to argue this is a
global emergency.
Same thing with the rest of the stuff
we've discussed. So I that's the first indication.
As everybody else saw too. Right? They declared
an emergency, it's like oh, here we go.
Right? Everybody was on the guard about that.
Now I already talked about a lot of
these fake news websites out there that are
pushing
verifiable false things. Even if they may end
up being the case, the point is a
lot of these fake news sites are out
there immediately going, this just happened.
The WHO orders mega lockdowns or whatever else.
Now I'm look. I'm the first one that
will tell you lockdowns are very plausible based
on any of these conversations.
No. That didn't happen though. Not yet anyway.
The WHO did not order any lockdowns, let
alone mega lockdowns, whatever that means.
But a lot of these ridiculous people out
there are always trying to manipulate you using
what you care about. That should irritate or
at least insult you. But you know what
I'm talking about. Now the point here is
what they put out. Doesn't mean they won't
do it. But right now, they're saying that's
probably not gonna happen. Monkeypox is a global
emergency. Will it cause lockdowns like COVID? Experts
say no. And the point is the logical
points that it's not spreading the same way.
It's harder to spread in general. That it's
use it's only a specific area. I mean,
there's a lot of different points to make
that doesn't mean, I mean, I don't believe
it was logical to lock down during COVID.
Far less logical to lock down with something
that is harder to spread.
But
all it takes is a conversation about how
it mutated one day later, which is what
they're saying right now, to suddenly say, now
we have to.
No. I'm Yeah. I'm not saying I I
am quite certain that at some point we'll
see that revisited.
Very certain fact. But whether that's this, I'm
objective enough to tell you that we don't
know that yet. So think about the ones
pretending they know right now when they don't,
and ask why you listen to them. Now,
here's all these I'm I'm not I guess
I'll read about it highlighted, but these are
just in case you wanna look further, here's
the World Health Organization and what they said
about it. They declare monkeypox outbreak,
upsurge in monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of
Congo. Now I I think it was doctor
Boyle and plenty of others who made this
point, the Congo and a lot of places
in Africa are stomping grounds for US government
experimentation.
Every he made that point in the beginning
of COVID. He said literally, a stone every
single outbreak of Ebola in Africa is a
stone throw away from a US lab.
He believes, without question, these are all manufactured
pandemics. Now he could be wrong, but he's
a very educated person. He literally wrote the
US Biowarfare Act that they still use.
But they kind of ostracized him during COVID
because he stood up and called it out.
Consider that. So Congo, being the place,
you know, it it doesn't ring true for
a lot of these reasons. But it says
the director general will share the report of
the committee's meeting, and based on the advice
of the committee, issue temporary recommendations to countries.
Now that seems to be where it's at.
Last I'm saying is right now, it's just
saying we should be concerned. Keep an eye
on this. That's where it's at. Again, certainly
possible to go further, but anyone telling you
otherwise is simply trying to hype and probably
for an ulterior motive.
Here's WHO from the UN, declares monkeypox virus
a public health emergency.
A concern. Here it says, clade one
has been circulating in the DRC, the kind
the the I'm gonna say DRC going forward,
Republic of Congo, different from just the was
it the,
I'm forgetting the first part. There's 2 locations.
One's the DRC and another version of Congo,
but they're different locations. So we're talking about
the democratic republic of Congo or DRC,
has been circulating there, clade 1, for years.
While clade 2 was responsible for the global
outbreak of 2022, which was for global outbreak.
I mean, even if that's what it was
at the time, which is a lot of
reason to doubt whether that's simply just side
effects of the COVID injections, which is not
a hypothetical, guys. We went in this in-depth
at that time, showing you the side effect
of all sorts of lesions and and exactly
the same things coming from the side effects
of the
But it's also something that could've been another
conversation, but either way, the point is that
that wasn't this a global it was a
I mean, what happened? Did it spread and
go crazy? No. There's very few points and
very few conversations, especially in the United States,
but they still called it a global outbreak.
Which was declared the same thing as it
is now. A international concern.
Tedros said in the past month that around
90 cases
of clade 1 were reported.
Again, it to me, if what are we
what what are we ultimately talking about in
regard to what the illness is, whether that's
what it's what it really ends up being?
You know, it it it to me,
as before, this is an overreaction
for the very clear interest of maintaining their
public health emergency
control structure. Now the WHO and the HHS
are people working within it, as I've shown
many times
throughout the years, have called this out. That
they maintain these kind of things to keep
you in the mind that they're they're needed,
which we'll get to in a second as
they ask for $87,000,000
or whatever it is. I'll get to in
a second.
Supporting case investigation and contact tracing. So there
again is already what we're talking about. They're
already telling you we need to keep watching
people. Use case following contact tracing. No. Immediately
push back on all this, and we need
to start doing that now. This cannot be
what we allow them to do. This is
we talk we just talked about the genomic
tracing and the biosurveillance.
What do you think this is overlapping with?
They're all gonna lean into it. It is
more than just this. This is the excuse.
Now it says, last August, the WHO chief
released standing recommendations under the IHR
to monitor monkeypox cases.
How do you think they do that, by
the way? We'll get to that. These recommendations
were set to expire in 5 days.
August 20, 2024.
Isn't that weird? Isn't that interesting how they
have a recommendation set that was set to
expire and on almost on the nose, they
go, emergency.
Don't let it expire. Let's make it a
lasting emergency. That seems a little bit contrived.
Right?
But it will be extended for another year
to support countries to respond to the chronic
risks, the chronic risks of a very small
spreading thing. Some of the recommendations include enhancing
community protection through adapting public health and social
measures to local extents and context, providing guidance
and resources for delivering clinical monkeypox care and
more. What do you think that means? Vaccines.
Control.
So that's where we are with the state
statements from them, and then here's just the
World Economic Forum, of course, because they have
to chime in. Here's what you need to
know, and then same kind of things.
Originally published May 26th.
Think about that.
So wait a minute.
As cases of monkeypox
rise, here's what you need to know.
To ask yourself, how in the world this
could be put out on May 26th?
When there was my as far as I
could tell, there was no real indication that
there was anything to be concerned about, and
I still don't think there is now. And
yet this, suddenly we declare an emergency, and
they go, oh, updated. We were already calling
that. That seems a little fishy, if you
ask me. And it says, monkeypox is the
same family of viruses that causes smallpox. Now
here's an important point we're gonna show you.
There's a real a scientific argument for why
that's not
it's the same thing.
That this or, you know, that obviously there
was an overlap to the injection and different
side effects of many things. Including other things
that we could get into, but I'm not
gonna muddy the conversation right now. But the
point is that
those things
have been argued by doctors, scientists, that these
are essentially the same thing. But it says,
but but while similar symptoms are similar, it
is less severe.
Right. Monkeypox is less severe than what they're
giving you the same injection for. That's also
the point.
Largely what they're putting forward for this is
a smallpox adjacent cowpox injection, and they're working
on mRNA versions for this monkeypox focus. So
basically, all super dangerous things. This is vaccines
and drugs developed for smallpox
work well against monkeypox. But as with COVID
19, equitable distribution and access to vaccines will
be key challenges globally.
Let me see if I can grab this.
There it is. I mean, it's actually mind
blowing to me that this is this is
the case. This is the vaccine they're talking
about, guys.
The they literally, in 2002 called this the
most dangerous vaccine.
You read this, it'll blow your
mind. Why anybody, anywhere, for any reason, would
ever put this in their body.
The why they rationalize? Because, well, smallpox is
just that dangerous. Now what whatever you think
about that,
how do we actually pretend that they could
just keep this dangerous thing as it is?
Like, you can't make it better? Is it
just that has to be that danger? It
doesn't make sense to me.
Either way,
this is one of the things they were
floating at least during the first kinda push
around this during the covid 19 conversation.
But here come on. Here we go.
Going from this next.
Here is the US sun, mutant
monkeypox, declared global health emergency by WHO after
rapid spread to 13 countries. So here's the
point that we keep seeing. We were told
before all this that this is very rare.
Remember the COVID, I said, well, mutations are
very rare. That's why, like, dot Michael Yeaton
came out and so and said that these
were samians.
Right? That they were just minor, minor variations,
and they would freak out about it. And
the point is that it's super, ultimately, very
rare outside of gain of function for this
kind of thing to happen one after another,
rapidly change. Right?
But yet, weirdly enough, and actually to the
point,
every time these things start popping off, we're,
like, weird. It's like, one to the next.
Rapid change. That's not normal.
To me, that shows a very clear signature,
which I got I'm this is coming from
people, scientists, and doctors that are speaking about
these things. Like, when I say that, I
mean, like, just the community to tap into
on Twitter and people like the different doctors
we focused on during COVID 19 or high
health related communities on there that are discussing
these things. And I agree. I'm not using
it as, like, a valid, you know, do
your research.
Back it up with scientific studies and what,
you know, not just what I heard from
doctors. My point though is I'm saying that
the general thought process is that this is
not how this works.
And that that stands out as a red
flag as to why this might have been,
at the very least, nudged
if it's there at all.
Global mutate mute, mutation or mutant mut monkeypox
declared a global emergency. Experts fear Europe is
next.
All their fear mongering hype is always 13
countries. Now the question is, is that really
what's going on there?
It says in the past month, about 90
cases of clade 1 b have been reported
in 4 countries.
Even to me right there, that does not
sound so what happened after that? That like,
if this was what they tell you, it's
an exploding pandemic, well, did that means by
now, this should be all over the place.
Right? But, no, it didn't. It didn't really
go any further. We see other countries with
cases here and there. And, again, I question
whether that's really what's happening in the first
place. But if it's not just exploding on
the scene, why are we having this conversation?
It's just hype, as always.
Even if you think it's a genuine risk.
Here is the recent post. This is from
today.
WHO says, I'm confident that monkeypox can be
stopped if we work in unison
under the leadership of the affected government, says
Tedros.
So that may not sound alarming to some
people, but to me, I just I can
see I I read into that
globalism.
Right? A a global entity that is in
this go overlaps with the pandemic treaty. I
don't know, a lot of people just don't
see the same things we see in that,
but I I I sense that this is
about continuing to normalize the idea that there's
some kind of a central role playing entity
that jumps up and has some kind of
unchallenged, which is not the case now, but
that's what they're building toward, unchallenged authority during
some kind of a health emergency. And as
they always say, if you give the government
the power to declare emergencies
why the how's that go again? If you,
give the that ultimately
they'll they'll declare an emergency to take power.
I think that's what it is. It's I
mean, that's just the most logical thing in
the world.
So if we see as that there could
be getting to kinda lean into that, all
of a sudden, you give them the authority
to be like, well, when this happens for
your best interest, we get to decide what
ultimately happens. Well, how long until we're just
always in
a nonstop, never ending emergency? Which by the
way, that's already where we are.
If you look at the US government's list,
there's emergencies that have never ended. They give
them all sorts of unilateral power that are
outside the scope of con doesn't matter.
COVID, the opioid aspect, COVID 19, all these
things are still happening. They didn't even stop
the ultimate e way around the COVID injections,
the u the FDA. We've talked about this
many times. Now they also broadened out the
flu conversation. We just showed you that. They
made the flu emergency amended to open up
the door to just regular flu vaccines. Or
excuse me, regular flu illness. So now we're
just on this flu emergency forever, apparently. It's
not like we're using it just yet, but
it's there. That's my point.
Now, like I said before,
$87,000,000.
WHO
is asking for $87,000,000
to combat the outbreak.
Okay?
So this is an already funded entity. Why
are you asking for more money to do
what we already fund you to do? And
on top of that, why is this something
that people $87,000,000
is coming from your pockets.
To do what? To give people injections that
I think are gonna hurt them? I mean,
I there's a problem with how this is
working for me.
And again, the idea is don't forget, they've
already done this. And what they got last
time was similar things.
WHO declares monkeypox a global health emergency. This
was back in, August
oh, wait.
Oh, excuse me. I'm I'm just I forgot.
So this was just the fact that the
title says, the second time. In 2 years.
So my point was, now they're doing it
again, but they've declared it before. I forget
the exact date. We saw that it happened
around the COVID era.
They declared an emergency. But not much actually
happened
other than them getting consolidating power, getting funding
for it, and now we're doing it all
over again. Two points there is, 1, how
that works, but secondarily, recognize that just because
they make that statement doesn't mean it's gonna
roll into a COVID illusion type scenario.
Could,
but we don't know for sure.
Now I talked about this back in 2022,
July 24th, the push for the dangerous treatment
of nonemergency
monkeypox.
So I'll play a clip for you just
to kind of give your mind back to
this time frame. This was 2022.
This is from our, this was a clip
actually made. I think it was by Star
back in the day in regard to our
clips that was on Instagram, I believe.
Well, here's my discussion of this, the push
for dangerous treatment of nonemergency monkeypox.
That's what's happening. This is still the most
recent page, June 17, 2022. This is from
the CDC.
There are no treatments specifically for monkeypox virus
infections, period. They have a smallpox vaccine. They've
got a different smallpox newer vaccine, and they've
got tpox treatment. All of which are dangerous.
I've gone over every single one of them.
Watch this show for a more in-depth coverage
of this, but just the one that I
want you to see is what they're pushing.
Here is this this is one of the
injections, all of which have similar problems. Not
all are live virus scenarios, but these are
being given right now. These are some of
the things that they're using. As it says,
on the CDC website, guys, for every 1,000
vaccinated, one person experiences a life, but a
serious, but not life threatening reaction.
These reactions may require medical
every 1,000 people.
Think about how crazy that is. They can
I it it it says that every 1,000
people, a person will experience a serious reaction?
Now they say, not necessarily life threatening, but
serious.
Okay. Well, compare that to the the the
unlikely scenario of what you might think will
happen with this conversation.
Every 1,000 people? I mean, it's just this
is the point. And right now, it's a
little different, which we'll show you next, because
they have other versions they're putting forward. But
it's the same conversation.
If we now saw what happened during COVID
19,
I just don't know why anybody can take
this at face value.
I mean, this is from their scientific research,
showing you what they were pushing was super
dangerous for something that wasn't.
I mean, frankly, I don't think I need
to convince anybody. I think that most people
in any standing right now are a little
bit uncomfortable with this. But
the weird thing,
regardless of the narrative, is both sides of
your government seem to be pushing this agenda,
despite the narrative. Tension. Here's what they're talking
about. Spreading the vaccinia virus, the cowpox virus,
by touching the vaccination site and then touching
another part of the body or another person.
It usually occurs on the genitals of the
face, including the eyes. So the point is
you can take this vaccine, and 1 in
every 1,000 people will be potentially
spreading the very thing you're being vaccinated against.
And it says this explicitly in many different
versions of the literature around these these injections.
Like, explicitly says that you can actually get
take the injection and then spread the illness.
So add that to the absurdity of what
we're talking about for something that's not that
danger. I mean, it did this is mind
blowingly stupid. And it happened. People took these
things during that conversation.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. That's
for something that's not killing anybody. So all
you're gonna do is increase you're you're forcing
everyone to go out there and get these
injections. I mean, how many people will get
injected for 1 in every 1,000? They then
can get sick and spread that to how
many knows people after that. And we're talking
about cases that are so minimal with no
deaths and acting like that makes sense. You're
manufacturing a pandemic with that. On top of
that and are life threatening, it also says
that between 1452 people will die out of
every 1,000,000 vaccinated. Now that's ridiculous. Wow. The
argument is because smallpox is so dangerous. But
with something that's killing nobody,
nobody
that was the case at the time. Remember,
there was no deaths. We're gonna actually, I
don't even think there are now, quite frankly.
But either way, the point is when there
was none, they were giving something that was
guaranteed to cause death.
This is absurd. They give them something that
kills possibly 52 people out of every 1,000,000.
Yeah. 330,000,000 people in the country.
People die to take this for something that
doesn't kill you. How does that make sense?
Now the same thing goes for tpox, and
I've gone over all of them. You can
check it all out here. I went in-depth
on this.
They're using animal studies from the the cowpox
for smallpox vaccine and inferring that information without
human trials to say that this works for
monkeypox.
That yeah. I forgot about that actually. That's
crazy. Remember, this they they were talking about
a secondary thing that they for for monkey
or for for, palpox.
And then inferring the data they took into
the smallpox conversation and proving that 3rd into
monkeypox. And the game there being that how
in the world do you pretend that just
immediately translates? But it's right on the surface
of the conversation.
I mean, it it's so dishonest.
I just don't know how anybody ever falls
for this stuff. But I mean, I do
because it's propaganda.
Right? They they watch, they follow their ID
logs, the leaders that tell them you're supposed
to trust this or listen to that. And
people fall for it. That doesn't make sense.
That's assuming that's even what's happening.
Now, next
is a clip.
I wanna make sure I didn't lose that.
Oh, hold on.
Next is a clip
of a
conversation, I think it was the FDA.
Or it's a White House conversation, but I
believe the point is they're having a conversation
about the monkeypox vaccine. I played at the
start. Listen to what he says. They were
giving this to people despite the fact that
they based these with everything else we already
said, by the way. All the different lies
and overlaps and extensions of just complete nonsense.
Then, they make the point clear that, well,
we're basing whatever we claim is the efficacy
on not real world information.
I mean, but but well, let me explain
it so I don't say the wrong word.
But the point is that they're clearly
extrapolating this out to and and pushing this
in a way that in any other context
would be dangerous, but they argue it's okay
because this is more dangerous. It's the same
mantra of the COVID 19 lie. We saw
how that worked.
First of all,
I I wanna point out there is no
traditional assessment of this vaccine.
As you know, it's approved for emergency purposes
based on the immunological
response, not on clinical outcomes.
Based on an emergency authorization which somehow just
drifted forward, now we're just using it for
something else, based on not actual clinical outcomes.
Sure sounds like a safe scientific direction to
me.
Because
there weren't smallpox cases and the monkeypox outbreaks
before this were
not, large enough to really do a clinical
trial. Think about that. But sure enough, we're
pushing it now even though we've never just
never was big enough to even find out
if it works. Good times. And so the
immunologic response with the intradermal
approach is exactly the same as with the
sub q. Nevertheless,
in either case, we'd wanna collect outcome data
as we do with all vaccines. And I'd
also point That means you.
So guess what? They gave you this thing
under the guise of whatever lies they were
telling you, and then collected all the data.
That's an experiment, guys. Just like we saw
with COVID 19, Mansek Salawi, Warp Speed, and
pharmacovigilance
under Palantir. It all happened. They never showed
you that data.
Or like he's saying, we're gonna track and
we're gonna study.
So maybe that's all it was about. Announced
that the NIH will be mounting,
a clinical trial and is working through the
logistics of that now. I know that,
both Peter and Rochelle have been involved
in that planning. Oh, good. Rochelle Walensky. Because
you know she's a sound person to be
involved in anything. Right? Well, here's the other
one. Same conversation.
Let me begin with what I've said before.
Every American should take monkeypox seriously, and every
American must do their part to help us
beat back monkeypox.
Can you believe that?
See, that was that she just pulled the
narrative from the COVID nonsense. So now you're
telling every American they should get an injection
for monkeypox to do their part? I mean,
guys, that's lunacy.
Not only is it super dangerous, not only
is it unscientific,
it's lunacy.
But these I don't these people are just
marching along to whatever tune they're being given.
On May 18th,
the first case of monkeypox was reported in
the US.
Today,
we have some
8,900
cases that have been reported.
Reported cases
never really verified with what they actually were
other than people saying, I've got some weird
thing, and I think it's monkeypox.
That's what happened. And there's there was even,
like, a functional testing set up with this
just yet. The bottom line was this was
simply
circumstantial.
And at the time, like a lot of
us were showing,
very clear, peer reviewed science showing what looked
just like they were saying was monkeypox, but
it was actually a vaccine side effect.
We saw a lot of that.
Given the continued spread of the monkeypox virus
at a rate outpacing the availability of our
current vaccine supply,
The agency began exploring viable scientific options
that would allow for greater access to the
currently available vaccine.
After conversations over the past several days with
key federal partners,
the infectious disease community, and Bavarian Nordic,
Today, the FDA has issued an emergency use
authorization or EUA,
allowing health care providers to use an alternative
dosing regimen of the JYNNEOS vaccine.
Great. An alternative dosing regimen. So now we
take something that's already dangerous, that's already wildly
understudied, that is clearly not used for the
right thing. And now we're gonna let the
peep, the pharmacist, whoever's giving that decide how
they wanna dole it out. And on top
of that, under emergency use authorization, so ultimately,
there's no one accountable. You gotta love how
great these people are. They really care about
you. Right?
This will increase the total number of doses
available for With no deaths.
No deaths. Use by up to fivefold.
The EUA also allows for use of the
vaccine in individuals younger than 18 years of
age. Oh, good. For children. That makes sense.
Determined to be at high risk of monkeypox
infection.
And these individuals
How in the world
are you pretending that children are at high
risk from a sexually transmitted disease that is
largely among gay men?
Anybody?
Doesn't matter. This they they might as well
just take them point for point from the
COVID conversation and just vomit it right back
here. And guess what? Nothing even came with
this. They just put it away. Now it's
coming back up.
These I mean, it it's just these people
need to be in jail. These are flat
out lies. And ultimately, the EUA now is
a kind of a permanent fixture for the
FDA.
I mean, this stuff is actually very concerning.
And I know you guys know that. I'm
hoping there are new people that are just
finally hearing this and recognize this is not
some kind of hypothetical fear, guys. This is
straight up dishonesty. Now, I don't even know
if he knows that. It's irrelevant to me.
We can prove it with the data, the
scientific research, and what has happened since. JYNNEOS
is administered by subcutaneous injection.
Additionally, JYNNEOS
has been tested in individuals with immunocompromising
conditions
and has been found to be safe and
effective
in the trials that were performed to support
approval.
In grant But yet it still lingers in
an EUA. Right? Because even though I mean,
the guy get the game that that's like,
the point is they want it to stay
there because no one's accountable. Granting a temporary
unapproved use of an approved product.
The FDA is still ensuring the vaccine meets
high standards
for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality Hardly. That
the American public has come to expect.
Yeah. That's worthy of ridicule right there. So
let's finish off with some important points around
why I think this might be possibly something
even more.
As the defender wrote, 2022, May 23rd,
as monkeypox cases spread, report shows Gates Foundation,
WHO, pharma execs, took part in monkeypox pandemic
simulation.
Nothing new there. Happens every damn time, it
seems. But it's worthy of consideration about how
the with the event 201.
Right? With with,
Kim,
Crimson Contagion,
Dark Winter. I mean, TLav has covered every
one of these. Whether it's Whitney or Derek
or myself on the show, we've covered damn
near every angle of these, and usually way
ahead of the rest of the mainframe alternative
media.
I mean, the conversation of, for example, things
like parasite stress theory or these different overlapping
state. We've gone over these, then all of
a sudden, it gets, you know, broken through
with some new story later from the usuals.
The point is that this stuff is very
clear.
They put forward these games. They usually predicted
program you know, they put out the idea
of what ultimately happens. And the same this
you and this same point can be made
4 times over with any of this difference
pandemic exercise we've talked about. The point is,
let's just take event 201. They went through
the point of what was going to happen
which eerily was like almost exactly what ended
up happening right before. They then found at
the end of the ex ex exercise that,
well, we aren't prepared. We don't have enough
ventilators. We don't have enough masks. We don't
have enough x y and z. We don't
have And then what do you know?
They had time. They did the exercise, and
then they just went, like, okay. We'll just
do nothing. Now my point is not that
they're just incompetent. That's true all the time.
My point is that that was about telling
you that that was the reality. But ask
yourself if they did the exercise,
what purpose is it? Wouldn't you argue they
do that to skip prepared?
Such as a prep, a prepare,
what's the word I'm looking for? It's prepare,
preparatory?
It's it's about being prepared. And the idea
is
that they didn't do that. They just learned
that they were prepared and then just went,
okay.
And then after COVID 19 illusion, they what
was the point? We didn't have enough masks,
and we didn't have enough ventilators, and Trump
had to make these actions happen? Okay. The
point is that it never ends up where
they do anything about what they learned from
these studies or exercises because it's about predictive
programming. And on the other side of it,
it's almost eerie to me that when you
look through things like Crimson Contagion, that what
they actually find
I mean, in their own
exercise,
the argument is that they lied to the
public, the public finds out, and they have
to I mean, this is within their own
study. They're literally working into their exercise that
they're the dishonest bad guy. It blows my
mind. It's right on the surface.
That they have to hide these things, that
they have to, you you know, it's just
it's crazy to me. Like, it's say point
is general.
So here we have an example in 2022
or before where they did a pan monkeypox
exercise.
So, and clearly, it didn't happen then,
but that doesn't mean it's not the same
preparation for the how they can control this
or at least putting this in your mind.
So there's one point to consider. A WHO
overlap with pharma execs all flushing out what
seems to be building a little bit now.
Here's 2022 from December. A monkeypox mRNA
lipid nanoparticle vaccine
targeting virus binding entry and transmission
drives protection against lethal ortho orthopox
viral challenge. Now the orthopox is the version
of what this is.
My point is simply to show you that
in everything under the sun right now, they're
working on a specific mRNA version of it,
which is dangerous.
Because as I've actually grabbed I forgot to
grab this one.
As peer reviewed science has found, and by
the way, which even Fauci seems to acknowledge
for whatever reason, it's actually it I don't
think it's all, it's in part, but maybe
the largest part, the platform itself.
That is the problem.
Study finds mRNA platform itself is driving myocarditis.
But, you know, science only matters when it
says what you like, apparently, and especially for
the US government.
The problem is that they're building on this
platform, which is dangerous. Now, I think I
might as well grab this too since I've
mentioned it many times. Usually it's one of
the first ones to pop up. Yeah. Right
here.
Anthony Fauci.
What is why is it doing that? That
is so weird. Anyway, stupid highlighter. January 11,
2023. I was trying to highlight his name.
There we go.
It cut to the chase. I'm gonna do
this quickly as soon as I can't find
this to the bottom.
Doctor Fauci, or just Fauci, female, likes doesn't
deserve that.
It says,
challenges to developing next generation respiratory vaccines are
many and complex.
We must better understand why
multiple
sequential mucosal infections with the same circulating respiratory
viruses spread out over decades of life fail
to elicit natural protective immunity.
There's really no way to misunderstand that. And
the point that doctor Bakhti pointed out, which
again, I don't even think is a is
a this is not an accident. Doctor Bakhti
in 2020,
as far as I can tell, one of
the earliest people to take a very hard
stance on saying every one of these will
kill you.
That he said, look, when you take a
an injection in the arm,
there's no way that will have an effect
on your mucosal immunity, which is what's necessary
to stop a respiratory virus. And guess what?
Now he's like, look look look what we
discovered.
No. There were people in the first moment
of this saying, that does make sense. They
know this. So there's another example of how
they played you on the ignorance of what
most people don't know. Or played your ignorance
around something that we all don't know.
Here is
one of the many examples.
All
gene based vaccines,
independent of manufacturers,
produce the same result
in the vaccinees.
He has looked at 15
in the last 4 days. The number has
been increased to 70.
Now just to just to make it quick.
He he goes on and talks he just
tells you it's dangerous. Right? His point is,
in 2020, he said that. Every one of
them are dangerous for you, the gene based
vaccines. Other ones are dangerous for other reasons,
spike protein in included. But this is specific
about the platform direction they're building on. And
as he went on to say, want one,
that they failed to do what the only
thing they were supposed to do, protective immunity.
He says, especially
with viruses that lack significant antigenic drift.
And he says, if we are to rationally
develop vaccines that prevent them, he says, we
must think outside the box to make next
generation vaccines that elicit immune protection against viruses
that survive in human populations because of their
ability to remain significantly outside the full protective
reach of human innate and adaptive immunity. And
guess what? They said, let's keep doing that.
Let's not change anything. Let's work on the
same platform that he just said we need
to
think outside the box about because it's not
giving you immunity.
Sure. Makes sense to me. I mean, it's
just mind blowing. Now, I honestly think if
I had to guess why this would be
happening, I don't trust Fauci if anyway. It's
because they have it now on the record
that they ultimately were like, well, you know,
you should know that it doesn't work exactly
the way we think it does.
Sorta like the revelation of the method, the
other thing. So now they can admit, well,
we told you. We told you. It didn't
work. You chose to do it. You can
decide if you think that's the case. I
ultimately don't know. MRNA injections, though, are being
built around monkeypox and everything else as we
speak, and let it likely already being used.
Now here's an article from prophecy or Global
Newswire.
Monkeypox vaccine and treatment market shares set to
reach $215,700,000,000
by 2034.
Now why would that be?
Anybody wanna question why something that doesn't seem
to be prominent at all or causing death
at all would suddenly be projected to reach
$215,000,000,000
market by 2034? I'm sure you can guess.
I mean, that's pretty alarming to me. Out
of everything we discussed today, that seems to
be far more indicative of what's happening if
they're telling you this is going to be
and look. They're talking about the same ones.
Jennie O's, we were just talking about this.
These are the same exact things. Smallpox vaccines,
they're literally telling you they're gonna make $250,000,000,000
off giving you things that are super dangerous
based on something that doesn't kill anybody, at
least right now.
I that's crazy.
That's that's reading into these things around the
side. Like, this is something that shows you
what's going on. I mean, how else do
you explain this? What's the other logic about
why this would suddenly be popular?
And Camus points out that monkeypox vaccines are
already being set are already set to begin
in in Africa, in Congo, specifically, DRC,
because of this.
So in my opinion, this is where we
get to the idea of where they're testing
something next.
Us usually in a country like this where
most Americans look the other way, because, you
know, it's not us, or it's, people with
different color skin. If it's, you know, if
it's if it's Israel if it's Israelis, if
it's people in Europe, oh my god, we
care about it. But sadly, a lot of
people look the other way because it's something
like Africa.
The point?
Vaccine doses cost a $100 per dose, making
them unaffordable for many, it says. 24 people
have died in the region from the virus.
So we're told. So money,
lots of money,
and experimentation.
And whether these people died from this or
not, it's hard to tell right now because
there's such a lack of trust in what
we're dealing with. But either way,
it does not seem justifiable
to give them something that I think is
more dangerous. That's my opinion. You guys can
decide for yourself. As but I'm talking main
point is about the US interest from the
or rather just the, you know well, specifically,
I'm speaking for as as an American for
US interest. And the bottom line
is that there's no, in any stretch of
the imagination, justification for taking this right now
at all, in my opinion. I'm not a
doctor. You can decide for yourself, but that's
my opinion. Now here
is another article, zahoa.com.
US donates 10,000 monkeypox vaccines to Nigeria. Oh,
good. How nice of you to donate something
that you charge Americans for. Like, think about
what that might suggest.
I genuinely my first ink from that is
is experimentation.
Who knows what's going on there? You can
decide for yourself.
And concerned citizen points out, 17 year old
Alexander is being vaccinated for monkeypox.
Now as much as, again, just because this
person put out something before that we could
see as well, doesn't mean, you know, you
question everything and consider all things, as always.
It's just information flow. Like the idea that
you would no longer even look at something
because of 1 you know, that that's it's
the same game in reverse either way you
look at it. I still look at the
corporate media and share things they say when
it makes a relevant point. But I question
them more than anybody. Right? For that very
reason, since we know that they lie all
the time. Now, the point here is simply
to show you that this is an American.
This is an American
getting a monkeypox injection.
And I don't even know why in the
world and he's a kid, a 17 year
old kid.
I just think I don't even know how
you pretend this makes sense. It's these indications
begin to make me worse. Why I'm talking
about this now? That there may very well
be something going on here more than just
the usual.
And the point they it it briefly pointed
to earlier,
it's also using PCR tests. So that on
top of everything else is like, okay. This
is neat little bow. All they need to
do is just push that first domino.
Simian's health care unveils indigenous PCR kit for
rapid monkeypox detection. That's us from today.
And here's even another one.
VeraxBioLabs
announces distribution agreement to commercialize monkeypox PCR test.
Okay. So, obviously, with them projecting 215
or was that over $200,000,000,000
to into 2020 up to 2034 for this
market,
and we have them projecting this, giving injections,
kids in the US, and then they're telling
you they're giving,
contracts to 2 different groups to make these
PCR, something else is behind this.
I mean, there's no way you would put
this much effort and money into something that
is what you're showing right now. So I'm
actually concerned about where this may go.
But my like I said before, let's take
it as it goes. We're doing the work
right now. Put the tools out there so
we understand the conversation, so we're ready to
push back, but let's not jump the gun.
I think that's a really important thing to
point out. Now here, August 27th from Reuters.
New monkeypox strain is changing fast.
That point I made earlier? Right? So this
is based on something they're claiming already mutated.
Right?
Now it's mutating again.
That just does not make sense other than
my opinion than gain function, or something else
that's not natural. It says the African scientists
are working blind to respond. You gotta love
that. So they're already giving people injections. They're
already giving all sorts of points. And it's
and these people are telling you, we don't
even know what's going on. And realize, these
are the people working in real time on
the thing that they're telling you is spreading.
Let me show you what I mean.
It says, I worry that this is the
doctor speaking from the WHO committee. I worry
that in Africa, which is where this is
all spawning from, right,
we are working blindly, she says.
Quote, we don't understand our outbreak very well.
And if we don't understand our outbreak very
well, we will have difficulty addressing the problem
in terms of transmission dynamics,
the sensitivity of the disease, risk factors of
the disease,
quote, and I worry about the fact that
the virus seems to be mutating and producing
the strains.
Yeah. That doesn't make sense at all. Right?
The point I'm making already made about the
fact that it doesn't line up. Or that
the rapid mutation is an indication of something
much more not organic or, natural. But
what she's telling you
is because of that, they're chasing their tail
right now. And because she and the point
she makes, she doesn't have the resources to
do what they should, which by the way,
they're sure than hap they're more than happy
to dump 10,000 injections that are gonna hurt
people on you, which sure won't give you
the tools to help find out whether it's
dangerous. I wonder why.
The point is that you're clearly saying we
don't know how it transmits. We don't know
the severity. We don't know the risk factors.
But here, take a bunch of injections and
let's lock down or put cur you know,
whatever they're doing based on the unknown,
that is the premise of COVID 19 and
what they told you to be on the
watch out for in
excuse me. The WHO
flu is, health is more than influenza documents
I've shared before. It's always about hyping the
next thing about the unknown as opposed to
addressing what's really happening.
If they're giving people injections with that little
that lack of information,
do you know it's not about actual risk?
Because that means what you're giving them could
actually be a it could hurt them. And
we know if if I know these things
are dangerous. The point though is that this
could say, here's an injection for what we
claim we're fighting, and it could actually be
something that is so on the surface dangerous
because it's not even addressing what they're dealing
with. A whole different variant conversation or different
proteins.
But at the end of the day,
how do we pretend that they're addressing what
they're dealing with if they don't even know
what what's going on?
She says monkeypox is an orthopoxvirus
from the family that causes smallpox. So the
article says, genetic sequences of clade 1, b
infections, which the WHO estimates emerged mid September
2023,
show they carry a mutation known as
APOBEC3,
a signature
of adaptation in humans.
That's important.
So they're saying that specifically this APOBEC
3,
I believe this protein,
is a signature of adaptation from humans is
what they're saying.
To me,
if this is rapidly changing, that's something that
we should look into. Right? What is that?
What does that mean? We'll do that next.
It says the virus that causes monkeypox has
typically been fairly stable
and slow to mutate, which is pretty much
what we expect epidemiologically if you believe that's
really happening from people that talk about this
in the past.
But it says, APOBEC
dash driven mutations, so the APOBEC
3 is in a family we're talking about,
but specifically it's a category
of a p o b e c mutations.
And that they're when they're driven mutation from
this, that they can accelerate viral evolution.
Okay. Interesting. So they're saying this is why
it's rapidly changing. Okay. That's interesting.
And it says doctor Miguel,
who is studying the evolution of monkeypox and
other viruses at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
in Seattle is the one that pointed this
out. Quote, all the human to human cases
of monkeypox
have
APOBEC
signature of mutations,
Which means that it's mutating a little bit
more rapidly than we would expect. Oh, okay.
That's fascinating.
So what they're telling you is one, that
that's seemingly why, and that every example that
we're pointing to right now, in humans,
all have that signature.
Okay. So what is it?
A p b o c three g,
a, however you pronounce that,
apple
appleoprotein,
b m RNA editing enzyme.
It is an m r n o excuse
me. Enzyme. Not a protein. MRNA
editing
enzyme.
Enzyme.
Enzyme. I can't talk. It's just so weird.
I kept saying m first. MRNA editing enzyme.
Doesn't that seem a little bit interesting? And
it says, is a human enzyme encoded
by the APBEC3g
gene?
Which is what we're discussing.
That belongs to the APOBEC
superfamily of proteins. Okay. So wait a sorry.
It's getting all mixed up.
For it is a protein, but enzyme specifically,
and it says this family of proteins has
been suggested
to play an important role in innate antiviral
immunity.
Okay. So if we're if we're bring the
general idea is this is something that's been
studied for
antiviral immunity.
It's interesting, isn't it? This thing is the
reason they're claiming this is mutating to actually
infect humans. Seems to be a little bit
of the opposite in a general sense.
So first and foremost, an mRNA editing enzyme
that is encoded by what we're dealing with,
specifically, gene that belongs to this superfamily of
proteins.
Now here are 2 studies that seem relevant,
and you'll see where I'm going with this.
This is 2008.
Cytidine,
dreaminase
or demonase
as a weapon against retroviruses
and new target for antiviral therapy.
Well, guess what that is? Apbec3g
was identified
as an anti HIV
cellular factor for targeted CD 4 t cells.
Oh, I think I've got it.
Oh, that's the next one.
Anyways, the first point was just simply so
this is something that has been studied as
not just a natural thing, but something that's
been used
as a weapon just to against
retrovirus and a new target for antiviral therapy.
Here's the next one. 2010.
The antiviral factor,
a p o b e c three g,
improves CTL recognition of cultured HIV infected t
cells. Here's what it says.
We examined whether a 3g, it's a shortened
version to that, edited defective viruses,
meaning meaning they've done this,
which are known to express truncated
or misfolded
viral proteins.
That sounds familiar. Right?
Because we've interviewed Jessica Rose, PhD, about this
topic, about the weird in incurrence of truncated
spike proteins
from the injections.
Blotgate and the unknown risks of truncated spike
proteins.
So what I'm seeing here is an overlap.
And it says this which is this this
we examined whether the a three g edited
defective viruses, which are known to express truncated
or misfolded bioproteins,
activate HIV 1 specific
CD 8 plus
cytotoxic
t lymphocytes,
that's the CTLs,
to this end, we compared
the immunogenicity
of cells infected with wild type or
f
VIF deleted that's the
defective ones. D f VIF deleted viruses in
the presence or absence of cytotine
demonase. Now that's the that's what we're talking
about, the same overlap. It says enzymatically,
inactive a 3g mutants
failed to enhance
CTL activation.
We also engineered
provirus bearing premature stop codons
in their genome as scars of a 3g
editing. Oh, I'm highlighting,
they have been experimenting with this.
In order to use this,
specifically this point in the on the conversation
of HIV.
And the point is that this is present
in every single human mutation that we're seeing
from monkeypox right now.
It says, our results reveal a novel function
for a 3g,
acting not only as an intrinsic antiviral factor,
but also as an inducer of the adaptive
immune system.
So simply pointing out, it's interesting to me,
yet another example of something that's been already
studied and working on in these labs ends
up being present in something that is the
reason we're seeing mutations in a suddenly rising
conversation.
To me, that seems pretty damn relevant.
But the overall,
it could simply be just that these are
the people testing on whatever they don't they
don't care about the fallout. And this is
just a byproduct of ongoing experimentation, gain of
function, whatever else. I don't know. I thought
this'd be interesting.
My point though is that if we're talking
about the idea that this is the premise,
this is the point of what they're saying,
why this seems to be mutating, we should
simply ask whether this could've been done.
Which is, I think, is the whole point.
You don't see mutations like this outside of
some kind of
unnatural change.
And then we see something they've been experimenting
with as the present reason for why it's
changing.
Pretty simple.
Then we can realize that back in 2022,
a government lab, which we talked about at
the time,
in Maryland,
was planning to create a hybrid monkeypox brain
strain
that is more deadly than the one currently
spreading.
Is this fascinating? So you can draw this
back to the idea that they were in
a lab working on making let's gain a
function, by the way. No question. Making this
more dangerous.
Right? Then we weirdly have some mutating rapid
thing that they say is more dangerous that
happens to be floating around, and it happens
to have the marker of something they've worked
on in the past. I just to me,
hard to see the lines there. The strings.
But
it could just as well be something I
I genuinely think and I'm not saying they
wouldn't be capable of doing this to us.
My I think that at the end of
the day, they being the power structure, your
government, whatever,
that this gen this very well could just
be that they just experiment on everything. They
don't care. They test on us. They try
things out. And ultimately, see things that change,
and they just take advantage of what happens.
I I think we've seen that. I mean,
it's very obvious.
Now here's what I wrote here's what's in
this article. A government laboratory in Maryland plans
to make the circulating monkeypox, this 2022,
strain more lethal in highly controversial research. I
mean, not such not just highly controversial.
Like, the focal point of why the COVID
nineteen illusion conversation like, the fact that we're
worried about gaining function.
That Fauci's denying it ever even happened, and
then all of a sudden, we're like, gain
a function. Here we go. That's not controversial.
That's crazy that I mean, almost like they're
taunting you. It says that the the the
team wants to equip the dominant splayed.
Again, that's what we're talking about. They now
say that's changed in this problematic one. They
took that first one, which mostly causes a
rash or flu like symptoms, with genes from
another strain that caused severe disease.
Doesn't that sound like the overlapping of what
we just talked about? It says it comes
just a week after dailymail.com
revealed a similar experiment, so there's more than
one, involving a hybrid COVID strain was conducted
at Boston University.
But the modified virus poses, as they say,
an exceptionally high risk to the public if
it accidentally leaked, which seems to happen all
the time, accidentally,
according to doctor Richard Ebright.
Next, it says the Maryland experiment was exempt
from oversight,
as it should. Right? Of course. Let them
do the dangerous thing to kill everybody with
no oversight when it was given the green
light in 2018,
thank you, Donald Trump, because monkeypox did not
meet the threshold for the potential pandemic pathogen.
So the point is you can see all
of them. Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Kamala, all
of them. All of them are in it's
it's like I said before, despite the narratives
and the fighting, it's just one
linear
progression
of the agendas
as it cycles back and forth through the
illusion of left and right. To be considered
a PPP,
the pathogen,
that's pan potential pandemic pathogen,
has to be widely transmissible with the potential
of spreading uncontrollably and being highly dangerous. And
so what do you know? They boom, bing,
bing, boom, make it happen. And now we've
got the thing and we're baffled by it.
Guys, we're baffled. Now I'm kinda being facetious.
I don't know that for sure. But I
think it's kinda crazy to see these overlaps
and not ask that question, which you won't
get from the corporate media or largely the
mainstream alternative media. I would argue in context,
like, think about that, how interesting it is
that you'll see things like this drive.
And then, the very people that were seemingly,
like, got most of their their clout during
the COVID 19 conversation just don't really focus
on things that tie back to Donald Trump,
or alternatively to Biden. If they're on that,
you know, depending on what side they're on.
It shows you that they're not really there
for the truth. They're there for influence, control,
mainstream alternative media style. Now, Jicky Leakes brings
up a great point in all this. This
is back from 2022, mind you.
She says here is your monkeypox match, folks.
Now a lot of this is a little
bit scientific. It might go over some people's
heads in regard to the actual
images.
I'll read you what they say down here,
but the point is they're seeing the sequence
exam the information
in regard to the scientific research. Like, there's
the argue is the argument is that this
was manufactured.
It says, next question. What inserts did they
put in?
A prasint,
Pradin analysis would be great just now, but
I'm sure
that they're they're just they're calling on people
in their community to check things out. The
point is you can look. Again, it's not
gonna make sense to I mean, I don't
know necessarily know what I'm looking at when
I'm looking at these things. But I do
hold people in the community around Jiki Lease,
the rest of them, and I regard. I
think they've done good work around this. The
point is, you can look all those up.
They have the links included. And this person
simply says, dumb it down for me. And
JK Leagues says, yes, they released the 2018
Israel strain. The Israel strain of monkeypox.
That's the point made earlier. These things are
inextricable. Israel is included in this dynamic. Don't
forget, Pfizer's lab, they called it. There's a
reason for that because they tested out everybody
unconditionally
from Pfizer's injection.
But it says, the Israel strain of monkeypox
in a small number of countries at the
same time.
And travel has increased its reach.
That they're straight up telling you that their
the information shows you that they had this
in their bank, they released it, and that's
where this came from.
Next
is Jakey Leagues also pointing out, and I've
this overlap's fascinating.
The monkeypox outbreak, they argue, was a planned
release
by Israel
in 2018. Or rather specifically, the monkeypox Israel
strain in 2018.
And that's what they're saying. It's in GenBank,
m n 648-051,
for those that can look these things up.
Targeting social gatherings of gay men in order
to blame homophobic Russia. Ends in quotes.
The people behind these this are psychopaths.
And this is an article Russia this is
what the corporate media is putting out. Planned
to use monkeypox as a bioweapon, report warned.
So you could very well argue like I
point out with the Azov movement point. A
lot of these agendas kind of just dissolved
because they lost control of a lot of
other things. But the point is they seem
to be laying the groundwork to act like
this was the very bio biological attack that
we were predicting and blaming it on Russia.
Maybe that's what the plan was and this
fell apart for a lot of different reasons.
It's very plausible. Remember my point about this
throughout the whole conversation, which is still certainly
possible,
where this would all come together. Where you
would see some kind of a foreign entity
in working with, at the time, they were
saying the MAGA terrorist. Right?
Releasing some kind of a bio weapon, then
you bring together all of the agendas at
once.
There's your example right there of where this
seemed to have been building, and maybe they
just
pretty damn interesting.
Now here is a search again on the
on TLAB of just all the different monkeypox
examples and shows we've done. There's quite a
lot of them.
Biden's monkeypox emergency.
Oh, labs in Ukraine.
Right? The overlap to the Azov movement, the
Donald Trump administration, the Biden administration, the US
government, the Israeli government involved with this group
that has taken control that they've then used.
Now, of course, one of the stories that
takes the focus for a lot of people
is the Biden Hunter example, which you should
not ignore. It's very important.
But it's interesting how that then kind of
draws away from some of the bigger conversations,
especially when it crosses over the two party
line.
The point is your government
has been and again, I argue the Biden
aspect is it overlaps with this very clearly.
But a lot of it is just their
individual
profiteering. Right? Where these individuals, whether Trump or
Biden or anybody else in politics, are taking
advantage of this power to make money
and influence and so on. But the point
is that we can prove
that they were using these locations, not just
one side or the other, but your government,
through multiple administrations that went back and forth,
that they were using these locations to work
on biological
research.
Weapons, guys. I know Russia calls it out,
but you shouldn't discount it because Russia says
that. I think Russia and plenty of others
are working on similar things. My
worries me that they've allowed this to get
so far out of their control, even knowing
that they would do it anyway.
Now ending in general, I wanted to make
2 2 points about,
Taylor Hudak wants to make first, make sure
we point out her amazing work, which I'm
I'm she's gonna have more coming on TLAD
soon.
Her so she had some of my in
my opinion, some of the absolute best interviews
around the COVID 19 research with doctors and
experts, again, with with,
specifically,
Arna Burkhardt,
which, again, I'm I'm I'm this is one
of the things I'm most proud of from
TLav in all of our history so far.
I mean, we spent 1,000 of dollars on
this interview. You know, multiple cameras, teams to
be there with her, translate I mean, everything.
Which, I
mean
let me know if you guys if it's
freezing for you. It doesn't seem to be
freezing on my end.
Okay. Good.
But the point in saying that in general
is just that, you know, I've it's not
I 1, just to realize how much these
things mean to us. Like, if you think
for one second we gotta return from that
after how much we put in, it's not
the case. Not even remotely. But that's not
what I did it for. It's not what
Taylor put the effort in for. It's because
we believe in this. And we believe it's
important to put that time and that money
in to get this kind of work to
you because it changes opinions.
Right? This is the kind of stuff that
actually right now. If we were in somehow
tied into the 2 party paradigm, this probably
would have been the most viral thing in
the world. But, of course, it gets clipped
out and used by other people without giving
credit to either Taylor or T Lab because
we're not part of the paradigm team. Either
way, I'm glad this gets reached because it's
important.
Pathologist Artur Burkhart's final interview before he died,
very suspiciously,
revealing the grave dangers of mRNA vaccines. This
guy is somebody you do not wanna miss
if you haven't seen this.
But, some plenty of others were, you know,
just Zoom interviews and so on, and this
is the one specifically
with doctor Christian Perron where we talk where
she talks about monkeypox and the risk and
the
in 20 this is discussed in 2022.
Just showing you again, this is where, you
know, we're demonstrating our value of how hard
we work to get this information to you
well before it's a focal point. But here's
Taylor on a recent, TNT interview. I just
wanna let let you hear what she had
to say. August 16th. And this is important,
you know, think about the larger overlap and
We should just we need to show skepticism
no matter what's going on, no matter what
party seems to be involved, no matter where
you think it's going. Because
overall, it's just a power structure. And they're
always using that dynamic to get you to
miss something.
Here is oh, I think I still have
it. Hold on. I have to grab it.
There it is.
Whenever I see the WHO trying to push
vaccines on vulnerable populations, whether it be recently
with polio vaccines on those in Gaza, or
now with, pox vaccines with those in Africa,
it does give you a feeling that is
very, very deeply unsettling, I would say, because
of the WHO's history. In the past, this
has been well documented. There's a documentary about
it. It's called Infertility, A Diabolical Agenda. I
would encourage people to check it out. And
it outlines this very sinister
agenda where the WHO had pushed vaccines onto
the populations within Africa,
and these were, specifically tetanus shots that included
the HCG
hormone, that's a pregnancy hormone,
and by including these in the tetanus vaccines
without consent, without the knowledge of those who
took the vaccine,
what happened was is that those individuals then
developed an immune response to the HCG hormone,
and therefore were unable to have children. That
is accurate information, not speculation, well documented. That
is absolutely disturbing,
unsettling, it's criminal, and I think that because
of this, and that's just one small example
of the WHO engaging in nefarious activity. The
fact that this had happened, I think the
WHO has forfeited its right to any public
trust based on this fact. And again, I
would encourage the viewers to check it out
for themselves. There's a documentary.
Absolutely.
Well said. 100% agree. Right? There's no I
mean, frankly, I think you know I'm of
the mind that we never should have trusted
these people. Like, the idea that you should
have ever trusted people in positions of power
is ludicrous.
That's ex I mean, whether you think you
are able to or not, it will eventually
be abused. That's how this works. Or you
could they or they could make a mistake
and you trusted them. And then it turns
out that you went the wrong way because
they made a mistake. Either way, the reality
of how this should work is that you
push back and question people in positions of
power more than anybody,
especially if they're the people that are on
your supposed side. But that's we all know
that's not what happens today. Now, last thing
I wanna end with today on this point
is I don't want people to forget that
we're seeing this well, first, remember, they just
fleshed this out, opened this open this door
to influenza a in regard to the amended
emergency.
That's also there. That's they they literally amended
the emergency to include the normal seasonal flu.
That's currently the reality. And that now opens
the door to emergency use authorizations for even
the flu shot, which I'd argue you may
not even know you're getting. You go out
and get the seasonal flu, and the pharmacist
gives you that new shot that they is
they they've just opened up, even though it's
the one you always get that it's under
EUA. Now, you get something even from that
you can't sue. That's the reality of the
dynamic.
Either way, we're a never ending emergency whether
you know it or not. Now point is
that they've pushed this idea around the flu
vaccine. Remember the bird flu push that was
all just 30 seconds ago? Seems to have
dropped off the map now, but it's still
there. It's still bottling. They're still telling you
that might be happening. My point is they're
driving flu injections.
This is from August 2, 2024. Flu vaccine
will curb bird flu, which see, and the
idea that they just pretend like these all
have overlapping effects, it's ridiculous to me. But
it says, the bird it says, will occur
with the bird flu risk for US farm
workers, c to c deputy director says. So
they're pushing the flu vaccine
all over, all the time anyway. Right? And
here's the article for there. Just one point
says, the campaign will distribute,
of course, the seasonal flu shot, but not
an h five n one specific vaccine for
bird flu among communities that may have limited
access.
Why in the world does that make sense?
You're literally saying, bird flu might be a
problem, but here, take the the seasonal shot.
Not the one that might be directly affected
on this one thing.
You know why I think? Call me a
conspiracy theorist. Either way, the point is we
already know, like, that doesn't make any sense
to me. But we already know, as we've
shown you many times over the years. Here's
a Pentagon funded study from 2020,
influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among department
of defense personnel during 2017,
2018.
The main point here, as even the defender
covered at the time, Pentagon study, the flu
shot raises the risk of coronavirus
by 36%.
And really, if you look at the study,
it raises the risk of just illness in
the in in a lot of different ways.
Let me see if I I think I
had it highlighted, but let me grab this
real quick.
There it is. So the point here, and
this is just the cut cut to the
chase, examining non influenza viruses,
specifically,
it says the odds of both coronavirus,
in a general sense, which by the way
means the common cold,
and human metanumavirus,
in vaccinated individuals were significantly
higher
when compared to unvaccinated
individuals.
That means very clearly, when you took the
flu shot,
it ra it dramatically increased your risk to
human metapneumovirus
and coronaviruses.
And the point is, coronaviruses was 36% increase,
metapneumoviruses
were 51%.
Remember, they pushed a massive flu surge of
vaccinations rejections right before the COVID illusion. Now
if you read further in this, the point
is it goes on to generally point out
that it also just increases your risk of
illnesses in general.
No. They claim not the flu, but so
you're literally taking something that dramatically increases the
risk of much more dangerous things, but yours
that makes sense to you. Right? Shouldn't.
Overall, now we have another hype of the
flu discussion right before they're hyping something else,
and I simply wonder whether this might be
a means to an end. Either way, I
don't know why you would take these things
knowing this is the reality.
And I'll end with point from 5 Times
August saying, are you living in fear yet?
Most of these are just from the last
few days. Now, I know a lot of
people can can interpret what we're doing as
fear,
but it's really not. Like, the reality should
be that we are taking agency of our
own information. We are driving our own destiny
here. And the point is that people see
what they're doing. If you can't find inspiration
in the reality that people
of countries collecting in the world going, we
don't trust you anymore because we know what
you're doing. Even if they still have the
power to force things and circumvent, we are
building something around the world of people that
simply see that whether it's the 2 party
illusion or just the crumbling power structures of
the of even globe the global aspect,
We can change things
because of that. That is the simple reality
of the momentum of the majority that they've
tried to take from you. Doesn't mean we
can immediately win or that we might not
lose still. But end of the day, what
we're doing
is a positive thing. We are showing you
that there is momentum. That we can see
through it. That we can affect change.
Quite the opposite of black pill. The reality
is there are other options than the controlled
dynamic.
And so, if you take fear from what
we're doing, I think it's because you might
be hyperfixating on the things that I'm showing
you that I'm trying to tell you are
part of their deception, even if they're dangerous.
We need to see an end on the
reality of the positive, that there are so
many people out there that are standing up.
Five times August example. Standing up and, in
his case, to put putting out music, reaching
people, opening minds.
That momentum is terrifying to the power structure,
and that to me is inspiring.
I believe all of you in this chat
and everybody here are something that terrifies people
that try to control minds. Because you're independent
thinkers, because you have compassion, you care about
other people. And I don't know I don't
know what else I mean, that to me
is something that's powerful.
That is why I do this.
So what he's telling you is if you
listen to a lot of the mainstream alternative
media, which is like World War 3, end
of the day, everything kind of hyping to
the extreme, or corporate media, which by the
way I kinda see as the same thing.
What they're doing is EEE, West Nile, US
is experiencing COVID waves, sloth fever,
New York begins spraying for West Nile, curfews,
black plague, all these different types of things
that may many of you just following don't
even matter. It's all about just keeping you
in a state of, well, we're screwed.
So
blindly acquiesce to what the government tells you
is best.
Don't fall for it.
Know that you are powerful.
You have the ability to stand up and
decide
your own direction.
And they just want you to cower back
in the corner and listen to what they
tell you is in your best interest. Whether
it's Trump telling you or Biden or whoever
else gets you to fall into line.
I know you guys see it. Thank you
for 5 times August for sharing this and
get people to recognize that it's about keeping
you trapped in that fear.
But I know you guys see this, and
I know that you're helping other people see
this. Now again, there's a level of community
there a a level of community there that
they just can't take away from you.
So help us continue to build that and
help us show people that there is a
path here. Now you can see it as
sort of a light at the end of
the tunnel, maybe it's distant.
I frankly see it as something that is
right there. We are moments away from some
kind of shift that they are desperately trying
to shovel their own. Right now, they're trying
to stop us from seeing it. I believe
that. I could be wrong as always.
But how do you not see the COVID
19 illusion and how people were desperate? I
mean, they it it blew up in their
face.
And yet yet they still got people to
fall for it. They still coerced many of
them, most of them, to do it. Israel
and Gaza, people are seeing through something that
has been controlling minds for almost a century,
or 3 quarters of a century, and the
point is that's terrifying to them. I find
positive motivation in that.
The very least, being what you want people
to see in the world is something that
we should all live with.
Right? Always. And I'm used to say this
all the time. The reality is that every
single day, if I've just reached one more
person, if there's one more person out there
that is going, oh my god. I finally
see it. That's a success. We are a
success because of that. And at the end
of the day,
it's all about just being a little bit
better.
Right? Something I've lived by my whole life.
Like, it doesn't mean that you're gonna change
the world tomorrow, but if all you can
look back and say, you know what? I
I was a little bit better than yesterday.
In any number of ways.
That's a success. And I think that's what
we're striving for. So thank you for being
a part of this community. You inspire me
every day. I love you all, as always.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.