You're not real.
What? You are?
Is any of it real?
I mean, look at this.
Look at it.
A world built
on fantasy. Synthetic emotions in the form of
pills. Psychological
warfare in the form of advertising. Mind altering
chemicals in the form
of food. Brainwashing
seminars in the form of media. Isolated bubbles
in the form of social networks.
Real?
You wanna talk about reality?
We haven't lived in anything remotely close to
it since the turn of the century. We
turned it off, forgot the batteries, stacked on
a bag of GMOs while we tossed the
remnants in the ever expanding
dumpster
of the human killer. Branded houses, trademarked by
corporations
built on bipolar numbers,
jumping up and down on digital displays,
hypnotizing us into the biggest slum where mankind
has ever seen. You can dig pretty deep,
kiddo,
or you can find anything where you live
in a kingdom of bullshit.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
August 27,
2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, you have to bear with me and
forgive me for not wearing my coat today.
As you might have heard circulating on social
media, I hurt a tendon in my arm
which has been one of the reasons I
have been not getting to a show recently,
but I've got a lot to catch up
on. So it'll be momentary, hopefully, and I've
been trying to rest it in general, but
I I it's not in me to not
do a show for this long. And so,
essentially, a little stressed a little bit today,
but I think it's important to to continue
to do this.
Probably gonna take the tomorrow off I'm thinking
depending on how it feels but just bear
with me on that. But I've got a
lot of great stuff to talk about today.
Well, you know, a lot of terrible things
but also some good stuff to start with
today that I wanted to share with you.
So, first off, I wanted to say before
I forgot.
I we had some issues with the audio,
not just recently. And I did found out
that the audio wasn't as,
up to the usual standard that we expect.
And I it was a simple issue that
was something we'd do with the sound board.
In general, just let me know and make
it a a a usual
thing to let me know if something seems
amiss. If the audio, the video, which you
guys usually do, but let me know in
the chat. Let me know if everything sounds
like it should and not like I'm speaking
through some kind of a tin can because
I'm you know, put the effort in to
make this all the the as good as
it can be so let's make sure I
don't have a simple setting wrong. So, you
know, it doesn't sound as good. So let
me know on that. Now I also wanna
say for those of you in this community,
there's a part of our community who is
a central foundational part of this group, which
is which is Orwell in the chat. And
I want you guys to know if you
don't are in communication with her, that she's
going through a pretty tough time with with
her her animal in her life. And it's
I I don't know how you guys feel
about this, but to me, I mean, this
this part of my family. It's a really
difficult thing for people to go through.
Hopefully, everything will turn out okay, but I
just wanted you guys to know, send your
love, your thoughts, you know, just love and
and positive energy to her. Reach out to
her. Ultimately, she'll she'll need support with this
in general. So if, you know, you have
the ability to reach out to her, let
her know that you're there for her.
Now I also I wanna start with 2
things today. Now, generally, what we're gonna talk
about, it's a little bit all over the
place because I'm really just trying to get
back in the swing. I mean, I've been
trying to pay attention.
But as you know, at least the way
I like to be immersed in kind of,
like, the moment to moment of what's going
on.
And I'm just trying to kinda get caught
up and discuss a few things over the
last so little of the week, so many
days in general. But I'm gonna focus to
start because and I wasn't planning on this
because I just did a focus kind of
an on Israel in general. I wanted to
talk more about the medical side of this,
which honestly, I won't I mean, I I
I might end up getting into more of
the ongoing development in regard to the monkeypox
direction, if we have time. Otherwise, it'll be
on the next show, and I'll keep saying
that. But it it's more based on what
I think is most pressing in this moment,
and I'm sure people will disagree with that.
My point, though, is that,
or as I go, oh, that ultimately that
I I put a big focus on Israel
to start today because I wanna make a
point about that that gets into the second
part today. For the people that are leaning
in, I mean, really just the reality of
our our current political dynamic and the people
that are pretty much everybody it seems except
Chole Stein, openly supporting the ongoing genocide and
how alarming that is. So I wanna make
sure we're aware of some of the most
current things happening right now and then go
into that talking the the conversation about what
is I what I perceive to be this
very large manipulation taking place.
I mean, it it unprecedented
even from within the 2 party illusion. And
for me, and for those of you that
know my opinion on this,
I very strongly believe that we're dealing with
our government,
not different angles and parts. I mean, there
are definitely different vying positions and power shifts.
But at the end of the day, we're
just dealing with the government as a power
structure that recognizes they are
better equipped to manipulate us as a whole
when they're not battling each other where it
matters. And I think that's something we have
to consider. That's just power structures in a
general sense.
But I think
more than just the 2 party illusion in
general, we are watching this kind of filter
down into something that I've been talking about
pretty consistently over the last so many weeks.
The alarming reality of the drive for Donald
Trump and then his next election. Now look.
You you don't have to believe agree that
the that was selection conversation,
And and that it's between two sides of
the same government. That still makes the same
point for me. That what we need to
be concerned about, if you believe that's how
it goes and that your vote translates, which
is certainly possible. I disagree with the evidence,
but I could be wrong. But ultimately,
it's still two sides of the same entity.
Whether we're talking about Zionism, whether we're talking
about digital IDs, whether we're talking about any
number of important points that are outside the
wedge issues that really seem to stay the
same either way regardless.
But I'm watching this drift into a very
alarming direction, the point being where we need
to care about who these people really are.
Not just care about how bad the other
side is being projected to you, but care
about who they really are, about their principles,
their integrity, what they stand for, not just
what they say, but what their history shows
about them. And I think this is really
important to consider. So I wanna start with
a point about what I've mentioned this recently
about oh, and the other point is we're
gonna get into GM mosquitoes because I wanted
to talk about it based on a current
conversation going around. We're gonna talk about, if
we have time, the medical aspect, monkeypox, and
a couple of other related issues and and
digital IDs, obviously, from the title. All this
will tie in as you'll see throughout the
conversation for multiple reasons.
That being said, I wanna start with a
conversation about
this term black pill.
This seems to be late it's kind of
shifted toward it's being late, thrown at people
like us right now. Myself included in the
TLIVE community and plenty of others that are
historically
very active about calling out the 2 party
illusion.
Now two things to talk about here. 1
is the reality of what black pill means,
and then the reality of what we're actually
saying.
So black pill, if you don't know, I'm
not even fond of the term quite frankly.
I don't see a place for a term
that means we're all screwed. I mean, I
think that that it ultimately boils down to
the idea that you think there's no solving
the problem, that we're gonna fail, that it's
all screwed. Everything's I mean, there's a level
of that in the conversation,
but, obviously, I agree. There's no fruitful part
of that. Like, even if you think that,
then why are you adding it? The point
is we're all trying to solve things here.
We're trying to find paths forward that benefit
people. And that's obviously what we're trying to
do, despite what people are trying to frame
it as. My point in describing it first
is to see that that's clearly.
Anybody objective can see that that's not what
we're doing, even if we are on the
side that right now the choices being presented
are all bad.
That's very different than thinking, screw it. We're
all gonna lose anyway. The reality is, hypothetically,
let's just say we looked and we saw
all you know, just
I I mean, the I I quite frankly,
I think that's what we're dealing with, but
villains. Just any whatever you imagine as, like,
the most obvious example of murderers and thieves
and villains and whatever else, and you looked
up and every one of them were outwardly
obvious.
The cho the end the the point should
not be that that's all that exists.
The point is, why are those the only
choices we're being given?
And to say that that is a black
pilled response to it's really it's it's saying
that the reality is is accepting that you
failed. The reality,
which is what I see it as, that
these people are being it's coordinated and construct
in to get you to pick
within the chosen reality that goes in all
the same direction.
To say that that's not the direction and
say that that is you giving up is
to hide the other 99%
of what's going on in the world. This
is the 2 party paradigm.
Now we're gonna talk about this in the
context of the rep I've been saying this
for a while, actually. The Republican side of
this, rather more so calling themselves patriots and
saying, well, yes, all the Republicans are just
joining with the Democrats. So we see the
2 party illusion. It's all a unit party
and now we're but that's the 2 party
illusion. You're literally still voting for a Republican.
So all you're really doing is breaking off
in a smaller fraction of that same dynamic
and saying, we're the ones that see it.
The Republicans are just with the Democrats, so
you're just now the Democrats and the Patriots.
That's the 2 it's the say if you're
still voting in the same system, that's how
I see that. Now, yes, I could be
wrong. Frankly, I hope that I'm wrong. I
hope that somebody will change this for the
better simply by checking a box. Wouldn't that
be easy?
I don't think that's the reality. So I'm
gonna start with a point about what somebody's
saying to kinda set the tone for what
this conversation is and I'll go more into
the explanation. And then I'm gonna point out
something that we're announcing that was we that
Derek just recently tweeted. And I wanna make
sure you guys fully understand with full transparency
what it is that we're trying to accomplish
so it doesn't get misrepresented by the people
who are already trying to misrepresent what we
think. And it is everywhere. It's not just
in this current situation. In fact, I was
just bunting up against somebody about this. I'm
not even gonna name who the person is
that's been sharing this because, frankly, it's very
disappointing to me that somebody I used to
think was, I don't know, paid cared, was
honest, would make this kind of ridiculous accusation
without evidence.
But that somebody was putting out the idea
that I was somehow completely bought in to,
like, the Sound of Freedom movie. And reg
I know there are varying opinions about people,
in this community.
You guys know I covered that. I simply
highlighted the movie. I highlighted that clearly there
is a sex trafficking industry and clearly there
is a problem to be addressed. That, in
and of itself, was being labeled QAnon.
My point was, well, that's silly. There's obviously
a problem.
And then I was pointing out that the
the film was being alarmingly used in a
partisan sphere, which I stressed skepticism.
And that was it. That's all I really
covered on that. Because I felt like it
was weirdly being remember I told you guys
I didn't even watch it because I don't
see the interest in watching a not a
documentary, but a movie about something terrible like
that. I didn't enjoy it's something I wouldn't
enjoy. The point is that that is a
narrative going around that I'm somehow
promoting and bought into this psyop that was
this. And I it's not I keep seeing
it brought up. My point is that there
are people out there who are
invested
in misrepresenting
what very particular people have to say. And
that shouldn't, in the same vein of being
objective,
make you assume or blindly
say that that means that we're honest. I
know that we're honest. But the point is
that that's not the way to look at
things. It should be proven to you. But
my point is they're lying about us for
whatever interest that they have, whoever was doing
that. I personally think it is because we
are honest. It is because we are objective
and completely nonpartisan.
I think that's a threat. I think that's
an obvious and overwhelming threat to what is
currently dissolving.
We were watching the current control structure fall
apart in every possible way, and this is
about trying to consolidate that control. That's the
technocracy
conversation. During COVID 19, the pea the conservative
part of this, not the Republicans are are
only invested in TeamSport politics, but the conservatives
out there who identify in that way, you
know, the ideals around conservatism and and they
they believe in those things and they ultimately
still see parts of the lies.
They saw it during COVID 19. We saw
how they were trying to drive us into
this technocratic panopticon because we're now in a
position where we're able to circumvent their control
structure. So they wanna get past that. My
point is now we've skipped past this to
where the very same people, rather the people
trying to lead, the conservatives, are trying to
aggressively drive you into that same position using
different conversations,
using the border conversation, using immigration,
using all sorts of different overlaps. Kathryn Austen
Fitts has been talking about this a lot.
We're gonna be interviewing her here in the
studio coming up soon, and that's what we're
gonna focus on. Sort of lifting the veil
around Israel and the Trump conversation. And then,
it's very alarming to what we're seeing here.
With RFK joining and now Gabbard joining the
conversation. There's a very clear and interesting problem
there. And so what's important to see
is that people trying to misrepresent that conversation,
ask yourself what it is they're trying to
hide. Why would they have to lie about
what we think in order to keep that
from your view? I think it's because it's
an obvious threat. Now, leave it there for
now and we're gonna get into some other
points around this I think are important and
you'll see as we go through. But I
wanted to start with this. And by the
way, bear with me. I I'm gonna be
slower at moving things and you'll see. There's
gonna be a probably, I'm sure, little moments
where I make the wrong move. I only
got my left hand here right now, so
just bear with me. So
here's where I wanna start.
Now this it really, I don't really wanna
get into the actual conversation that that preceded
this. You guys can read it. It'll be
in the show notes. Just because I think
it'll it'll distract from the main point. But
I I I'd let just a thought here
is somebody who I respect. I think she's
very objective. I think she's got a very
clear handle on the 2 party illusion. And
my point is, if you look at just
look at her Twitter thread. I think she
has very clear principles that she upholds.
I think that's important. I think that's paramount,
quite frankly, in this conversation today. That doesn't
mean that we have to agree with everything
that a another person thinks, but we can
at least acknowledge that they stand by what
they think. Consistently. That should matter to all
of us. And, I I I do agree
with I mean, I I think her our
stance are very similar.
So she says this in regard to an
ongoing conversation. All this vitriol because I questioned
this person saying that, saying, like, things on
their show about what's gonna happen with RFK
and Trump is gonna change things as historic,
whatever. Right? So this person responds and by
the way my opinion is what she's saying
is pretty valid. I think ultimately what she's
highlighting is that there's a lot of people
and it I'm not gonna say all dishonest.
I think there are people that are just
being snowed by this that are falling into
the trap that's being presented by RFK and
Trump and this whole thing. It's all gonna
I mean, I hope, as always, I really
hope that I'm wrong and they're gonna change
everything for the better. But I think it's
quite obvious these people are not what they
pretend to be. Not RFK, not Trump, not
any of them. If we're being objective and
not blinded by the partisan game.
This person responds by saying, and this is
my point.
You're one of those black pillars. I'm telling
you, there's a real big thing going around
about this. Now before I even say it
read it all, the point about this has
been a comment. Black pill is a term.
Used to be something that was used as,
like, a at least as I saw it,
like, a po almost not a positive, but
sort of like I see it more than
you do. I'm black pill. Like, I get
it. You guys don't see the problem yet.
You don't see how bad it really is.
That's kinda how it first started.
But what I'm seeing now, and you'll see,
it's turned into an accusation from people who
are tapped into the paradigm,
saying, you're just black pill. Like, you just
don't see that we're the adults in the
room, and you have to make a rational
compromise to make this work. And sometimes that
can be the case,
but you'll see that how dishonest this is
about a lot of people like Derek primary
in this conversation
who is doing near almost the primarily
solutions
outside the political spectrum.
How in the world you can call that
black pill? That's beyond me. He's the best
example to make in this. But it says
you're one of those black pillars who that
thinks, it should be who thinks,
you're super edgy and clever for opposing everyone.
But she's not doing that. She's not opposing
everyone. She's only opposing the people within his
control paradigm.
One left or right.
If you actually ask her opinion, she'll give
you all sorts of other things to talk
about other than the controlled left right paradigm.
But it says, all and opposing everyone all
the time, nobody could pass your purity test.
You'll hear these two things. Purity test, black
pill. You're getting the same kind of this
is what happens when these things filter through
the 2 party controlled system and the people
that are lost in it. You get the
same recycled narratives.
And it says, for you and I'm I'm
not saying that's necessarily what he's dealing with,
he could've just come up with it on
his own. But kinda don't think so when
you can see the same things being said,
you guys can decide for yourselves. It says,
for you, the perfection,
it's for you, the perfection or bust. But
I I either way you get his point,
like, it's perfection or bust, like a utopian
Bolshevik. Of course, really trying to throw in
that the buzz word to get people to
reject the idea that we should want perfection.
Like, just to be clear, I highly doubt
we're ever gonna get perfection, but should should
we not strive for that? That's the second
point. My point is that that's not even
what she's actually saying. But it's interesting to
think about that. So we're genuinely being told
right now that if you can't find the
positive between the lesser of 2 evils, then
you're just a child. That you don't really
understand how this works.
Does that make do do you feel that
that's true? And everyone out there listening, do
you feel that we really are being told
by the adults in the room that the
only thing we should expect is one of
the 2 Zionists being given to us. I
can't and let's even remove the Zionist point.
Because I know in a lot of ways
that's gets people to drive the other direction
because it's so blinded. The the game has
been like, that is such a constant issue
right now that some people have chosen to
just oh, you say Zionist, then I'm on
the other side. But the point is
to get just
Trump and Kamala. Are we really gonna pretend
those are the 2 best people to run
this country? The I mean, there are other
options, you understand. They're not even considering those
things.
But for you, you just want good for
this country, you child. It's like, that seems
to be the present. Obviously, they think that
these things will drink good, but the reality
is the whole conversation
is the other side is just worse.
And we all know that right now. So
she responds by saying, you do not know
me. He's wrong about her. Your opinion on
my character has nothing to do with what
I posted. And that's usually how it goes.
Right? Strawmat attacks, subjective arguments, assumptive points. Either
debate what was said or move on.
He says, I scrolled your timeline.
Wow. You're against everyone and everything. No. Again,
I challenge you to look for yourself. She's
against the paradigm, the controlled
illusion that we're pretending represents everything.
Again, if you actually asked her opinion as
opposed to forcing what you think it is
onto her state, you would see that there
are other things that she would put forward.
And it says, who would you support? And
he finally gets to that. So wouldn't you
start with that? If you're gonna say, you
think this and that, Wouldn't you just start
by going, hey, I don't know what you
actually think. Why don't you let me know?
That's not how Twitter works. Right? It says,
who gets in before you call for a
purity spiral? I don't even know what that
means.
He says she says simply, I do not
want rulers.
I don't hide that. Why do you?
And funny how she he doesn't respond after
that, because what are you gonna say? The
point is that all we're really talking about
is that we want actual freedom and liberty,
not, you know, awful but law you know,
lawful or awful but lawful or whatever. You
know, the game where it's freedom of speech,
not freedom of reach. You know, we'll give
you a part of what you should actually
have without us being dictating what you like,
that's the game. These are not things that
they should have the right to say, we're
gonna limit this for you. Now I'm not
even really talking about the Twitter platform and
the illusion that this is some kind of
a individual company and not simply an extension
of the government. That's my opinion. I'm talking
about all of this together. And the idea
that what we're actually discussing is not
is is it's about control
versus actual liberty and freedom.
And I think that's what it comes down
to. Now you don't have to agree with
my opinion or with what she thinks, but
I'm I challenge you to stand back and
look at what we're actually discussing,
what we're talking about every day. And either
we're highlighting bigger problems in the world or
simply to saying that what we and, again,
it comes down to the finer point of
if you can't acknowledge that Trump,
Operation Warp Speed, and I mean, or or
or Kamala, and I mean, you could go
you can go off on both of their
track records and show how they've been caught
lying. Show how they are not what they
present themselves to be, or RFK Junior, or
Walls, or any of them. And if you
are unwilling to consider those things because, well,
you're just gonna let Kamala win, my point
is you don't really care about the truth.
Because you're ultimately hiding from it. And then
if you get pressed on it, the point
is, well, they're better anyway. But you ignore
those things. And I think this is the
larger problem. That these this is all just
my opinion about this. Now this is why
we're starting this.
Now I wanna be very clear about this.
I guarantee this will be misrepresented
as some kind of a coordinated, you know,
like we're working before somebody else. Always how
this works.
Feel free to dive through this. Feel free
to look at our track records. Feel free
to look at what we present, who we
get our funding from, which by the way
is you
for all of us.
I mean, the the or specifically speaking for
us, the t for TLAB in general, for
Whitney, for Derek, who have their own platforms
as well.
Look at the re if you're if if
this ends up being about how we're some
kind of insider manipulation and all it's based
on is that that that
influencer said so, maybe stand back and ask
if it's actually true. Seeing as how much
is being lied about today. I'm only saying
that because I already know where this is
going and I this is why we're doing
this. So let me read this first and
I'll have some more comments. So Derek put
this out. Whitney, Derek and I were talking
about this offline over yesterday or day before
yesterday into today. And we sent this out
to an a a big group of people.
Here's what it says. Basically, via email. That
I we both we all decided we wanted
to post it so you guys could see
what we're actually doing. Transparency is important.
It says myself, Whitney Webb, and TLav are
organizing an alliance of independent media specifically focused
on individuals who have been consistently correct
and principled. That's huge to me. In their
reporting on 3 core issues,
COVID 19, COVID 19 84, the illusion therein,
Israel's assault on Palestine,
and the 2 party deception.
We are reaching out
to several people who fit this bill
with the intention of forming an alliance. Now
that's not necessarily like a network per se,
really just an overlapping alliance of what we
all see going on and and helping promote
and and in some cases working on like,
we're talking about like a a news
feed kind of conversation, but it's all gonna
build as we go forward. And it says
our reasoning behind this is related to concerns
that already rampant social media censorship will continue
to sideline critical voices of dominant narratives as
well as concerns that is important to organize
to promote voices and viewpoints that focus more
on directly tackling dangerous policy agendas,
I e digital IDs, CBDCs,
etcetera,
and not on promoting branded politicians and related
distractionary drama. Now on that point, it's important.
Because you can argue, and I'm not gonna
you can have the mind that Trump genuinely
wants to fight those things and I disagree,
but you that's your opinion. The point is
not about debating whether Trump is the guy.
The point is removing that from the conversation,
not promoting branded politicians and related distractionary drama.
If somebody makes an action that we think
is in a good direction stopping the things
we disagree, then good. I promote that. Trump,
Kamala, I don't care. It's your government, guys.
If they do something based on what we're
driving to do as a positive action, we
will go, yes. That's good. Not blindly ignore
it because we hate Trump or Kamala which
is what we see in the 2 party
illusion and a lot of the people trapped
within this and a lot of the talking
heads that get pulled into that. A lot
of them I've seen over the years that
I think started with a genuine intention have
gotten pulled into the orbit of some of
these manipulators, and I think they self censor.
I really do. But the point
is avoiding all of these things. Having the
conversation where it's necessary about how they play
a factor,
but not choosing sides against each other.
And it says some of the potential actions
we are considering include it's all potential, it's
very new. A weekly, biweekly joint newsletter to
highlight alliance members' work relevant to exposing the
agendas above,
particularly over the next 2 months as we
approach the US election.
2, weekly or biweekly panel conversations about these
topics. I would argue by I would desire,
but it's based on everyone else's choice that
those be public. That would that's what I
would want. Joint investigations highlighting the co opting
of the freedom movement. That's important.
And how the US election is playing a
role.
We are specifically only interested in collaborating with
people who were correct from the beginning
on these issues. Now it's not the intention
to box out anybody that ultimately
recognized the problem and then really did call
it out, but this is just a starting
point to understand. It's about principle
and about people that have shown that they're
willing to stand by that. And it says
invitations to this small alliance have already been
sent and more will be likely sent. In
those in the audience to those in the
audience who see the insanity that we see,
Hold tight to your critical thinking. We are
going to do our best to unite the
independent media at the outlets within and individuals
who still have principles to collaborate how we
can push back against the quickly emerging mainstream
alternative media.
We need your support now more than ever.
Stay tuned for details on how to support.
Now we're very motivated about this. We're we're
the you're going to see things happening here.
We've already got a lot of response. But
I think it's very important that we get
ahead of what will no doubt be framed
around this conversation.
All I ask is that you do your
due diligence. That if you if some if
a claim is circulated about what this is
or what we
look into it.
I challenge you to actually look into the
nay the the narrative, the claim, and find
for yourself
that we are exactly what we present. We
are exactly what we put forward,
and it's easy to check.
I hope that I mean, I really feel
positive about where this is going even though
we're in a pretty
frustrating and dangerous time. Because I feel more
pressure to pull people into the paradigm now
more than ever. And again, my point in
the beginning, because
it's more possible than ever to actually change
it.
So thank you for your consideration on this.
I think it's important. Make sure you reach
out and share this if you got thoughts.
I wanna hear what you have to say.
Now Derek put out an article or, technically,
we had an interview that we just put
out on the 26th.
And it's a it just wanted to make
sure you saw it before we get into
everything else. It's a great discussion. And, of
course, if you haven't seen it oops. Realizing
that says with a lowercase s. Dang it.
US government's fluoride report finally released and 2
party and and the 2 party obsession. Now
I'm not gonna blame that on my sling,
but let's go ahead and say that anyway
since it was well, I had this small
sling in my arm. But, anyway,
this is a great conversation for 1, because
if you haven't seen it, the report that
came out, it's what Derek has been busting
his butt on around this conversation for years
or more,
well before he's been doing it for TLAF.
The reality of fluoride being dangerous for you,
which is exactly what it finds. And they're
still trying to water this down. They're still
desperately trying to hide the reality from this.
Your government,
all sides of it, are actively trying to
keep this in your water as we already
know and have for a long time because
of other peer reviewed studies that it's hurting
you and lowering your IQ of your children
and causing hormones or all sorts of things.
And then we also talk about this general
premise because it's on our minds. The 2
party obsession. The reality of what this means.
We talk about RFK and Trump and then
where that's going.
Now let's start with this point. Really, just
kind of a quick point about censorship of
Twitter. That yeah. I I feel like it's
important whether or not it's about the bigger
conversation we're having because of what a prominent
point this is right now. And then we're
gonna get into some Israel conversation and bring
this back around because all of this connects,
in my opinion, to the 2 party illusion
obsession. Now here's a clip I think is
important. Because here's what here and really, this
is the starting point for what I was
just saying. That if we are an incapable
of acknowledging
the contradiction here,
we need to rather people that can see
that and might still be on the side
of work we need to reflect on that.
If you can't acknowledge that what's going on
on Twitter is not what they're telling you
it is, now we can I look? Uh-uh.
Like I've said, I have my account back.
That's better than not having it, and I
would argue that there is differences in positive
ways right now. But I've always said, based
on what we can clearly see, that this
is a very, very surreptitious,
more manipulative time around this. It's not just
blanket blunt censorship. There's far more going on.
That's my opinion, but I think it's quite
obvious with bots and and 5th 5th generation
warfare type of tech,
directions.
So when we're seeing this,
and we see them continue to almost almost
try in to promote that we are the
ones fighting for free speech. We are pushing
back against censorship. Him tweeting things that seem
to suggest that, you know, laughing about how
everyone else is censoring. Well, we can prove
that they are censoring people right now in
particular around, Israel, but I've all I've seen
things centered around vaccine conversations. I've seen accounts
deleted for these things. We've talked about this.
It's just that the people who are invested
in him as an ideologue who the for
the next Trump selection
don't want to see it or don't want
to point it out. But that doesn't apply
to all the other conservatives out there that
recognize it and might just be uncomfortable pointing
it out because of that. There's where you
need to have principle and stand up and
say, no. This is wrong. I still believe
in Trump, but this is not true. Elon
is censoring people. They are suppressing them. They
are working with the Zionist genocidal government to
take your biometric data. Yes. That's still happening.
They're using CHEQ to flood this platform with
bots. Yes. Easy to prove.
I mean, we need to be clear about
that. And so this is a point about
general censorship. Here is what he posted on
25th.
He posted a clip of him blanket saying
moderation
is censorship.
Do you know what I mean? We realize
that they're moderating on this platform. Right? I'm
gonna play the clip next of Yaccarino that
was made by Casey Wright
showing her openly acknowledging that we're sending and
Elon nodding along.
So my point is simple. I'm not saying
you have to disagree with that moderation might
be needed in some cases, you can decide
that if you want. I disagree with the
real idea of free speech, but my point
is that you can't pretend over here
that moderation's bad and go, yay, he's saving
free speech, and then pretend that they're not
doing exactly that. Or partnering with Garm in
some kind of illusion of fighting back and
nothing go I mean, there's so many weird
dynamics here that people are trying to ignore.
So let's play this clip first.
Censorship is what you're saying? No. I don't
love censorship. Then why why you ask I
believe in moderation, but I I don't believe
in censorship is a is a moderation is
a propaganda word for censorship. Okay. Right there.
So by that logic and his pushback that
got him a lot of attention, yeah, Don
Lemon sucks, which I agree. And he's the
one pushing back because this is what we
should want. And then goes on to moderate.
Shouldn't that should that at least be kind
of ridiculed? Like, well, I mean or you
could maybe okay. Let's just be objective. He
could've gotten into this and go, you know
what? Well, I do think we do need
some. So I just realized I was wrong.
Well, I would respect that, except that's not
what's happening. Instead, you keep pretending like you're
not doing any of that and cheering on
the free speech warrior when that's not the
truth. I don't know why that wouldn't matter
to anybody. Doesn't mean you have to stop
supporting him. You could just laugh it off
and keep supporting him, but at least acknowledge
it. Recognize that there's a very dishonest game
being played right now. But don't you think
free speech is one thing. Right? Or not,
you know Look. If it's not illegal, we're
gonna take it down. If it's not illegal,
then we're putting our thumb on the scale
and we're bringing sensors.
Okay. So
the point, and this is what we all
pretended was gonna be happening in the first
place, that if it's illegal, it goes away.
If not, you're good. Well, that's not what's
happening. Even that's again, moderate Yackarino from the
World Economic Forum, who has now partnered with
GARM, who they pretend they're fighting,
claimed right away that we're gonna moderate. We
have to. And they all went along with
it. So it's just hypocrites and hypocrisy. Now,
my point is not that this was original
and they changed their mind, but he just
tweeted this out. Going, yeah.
So why would you do that if you
know that you're also moderating? That seems very
deceptive, very manipulative
if you ask me.
You're putting your thumb on the scale for
moderating hate speech. I mean, you don't God
Limon is such a moron. I didn't even
understand what he was saying to be clear.
What Elon was saying is that if it's
illegal, we take it down. But if it's
not, then that means we're putting our thumb
on the scale.
Sounded pretty clear to me, but, Don, you
know, the old entertainment news guy that got
forced into real news who should be laughed
at. But, anyway Put out child pornography.
That's not it's illegal. That some people would
say that's considered censorship. I'm just You know,
here another point. By the way, it's funny
that this is what happens when you put
some kind of fraud pretending to be a
journalist to try to make it look like
you're holding him accountable, and then it makes
him look that good.
Let's get a if you give someone who
has real questions, it might be a little
bit more challenging. Ting, you No. I literally
Donnie, I'll say I I literally said, if
if something is legal,
okay, we will obviously remove it. Okay?
But if it is not legal,
the the the laws in this country are
are put forward by the citizens. We are
a democracy.
If those laws put in place,
by the by the people, we adhere to
those laws. Okay. I agree. Yeah. But but
again, that's not what's ultimately happening. Even though
we just reshared this. I agree. Of of
others. If you go beyond the law, you're
actually going beyond the will of the people.
Well, it's really flowery words that he has
yet to hold up to at all.
Now, look, I'm not trying to be overly
critical. I just think it's important to highlight
this when it's in a with this weird
psychological I mean, this we are witnessing something
very unnerving.
We're an entire grouping of people, and it's
not new.
Cultish kind of things have happened all over
throughout history. But where we are, like, in
this dangerous mindset where the the reality right
in front of us is almost you're almost
being called a child for even highlighting it
because we know that will actually help the
bad guy.
So the facts don't matter is you you
it came to our politics. That's what it
means. Now, here is debating
as Casey Wright pointed out because this is
what she said in the beginning and what
she ultimately did, and it all contradicts what
he just said.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the house judiciary committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
More of an open feedback loop. And that's
scarred, by the way, that that they repartnered
with on July 1st. And as far as
I can tell, that never went away despite
the dissolving of the over umbrella
structure as Mike Benz pointed out. They're still
able to continue to function.
I guess all the republican screaming, I don't
wanna win this was, didn't wanna acknowledge that.
Which continues to show you that there's something
very dishonest happening here. Loop for the advertising
experts in this room
to help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,
ad safety,
content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what the influence is. Yeah. And if
you watch the full clip, there's no pushback.
That's that's yep.
Got it. And that's what they've gone on
to do. That puts your global town square,
the one place that you can express yourself
freely and openly. We have built content moderation
tools
that have never existed before at the Okay.
So it's clear. Now that was the early
one was them spitballing. Now it's her on
whatever,
you know, what is this?
Squawk on the street, whatever.
On on a mainstream channel
pointing out what they have done.
Hope that's clear because, yes, they are moderating.
This company, if you are gonna post something
that is lawful
but it's awful,
you get labeled
at long term risk.
People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted, and we've introduced a new policy
called
freedom
of speech,
not reach.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
what gets monetized.
Right. And she's talking about speak speaking about
GARM right there, which they partner with again.
But that's exactly what they're doing over here
on a smaller scale. Their little group decides
what's monetized. She just said that. What what
a hypocrite. I mean, it's just insulting.
But more importantly,
if you are gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled,
you get de amplified,
which means it cannot be shared,
and it is certainly
demonetized.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
what gets monetized.
It is certainly
demonetized.
Mhmm. Let's also make sure we remember that,
Sam Husseini, I interviewed him in the first
time a while ago about I'm gonna mention
our interview we just recently had later in
the show.
We discussed this and this is the this
is and he he makes she shows precedent
Historically,
legal precedent. That freedom of reach is a
part of freedom of speech. So again, the
legal precedent doesn't even matter. They only they
just knew that most people would not know
that, and so they just pretend like they're
oh, we still give you freedom of speech,
but no, you don't. Because that's a part
of it, legally speaking. But they don't care.
Because we're we're being manipulated by the government.
That's the reality. So here is another censorship
point that I think is interesting. You might
have seen I recently put this thread out.
And I'm gonna talk about it coming up
here. I don't wanna try to jump in
and find it. But you'll see it in
a minute. I've I've already shared a lot.
It's a thread that I've added, I mean,
about maybe 12 more videos to today, I
think. Or maybe 8, I forget. Of more
doctors speaking out about what they've seen in
Gaza. It's horrifying.
They're everywhere and every one of them has
the same opinion. And weirdly enough, we can't
just deduce, some people can't, what that really
means. But I put this thread out and
I got all sorts of comments. Some of
which said they could see it, but a
lot of people were show giving me shots
that said, look, I can't all I can
see is the link, the thread doesn't show
up or it says the unavailable
which we all have seen. I just bumped
up against that yesterday where someone shared a
link, I looked at it and said, video
unavailable or rather just said post unavailable. But
then I sent somebody sent me the direct
link and sure enough there it was. So
there's very weird social engineering kind of stuff
going on here. My point is that people
weren't able and I will I mean, actually,
let me see if I can't
I wanna show you for this point right
now. There it is. I'll come back to
this. Here is what they put on this
video.
We put a warning on this post because
of my sensitive content. No. Everyone here is
simply talking. It's people on shows. Everything they
list off as a possible sensitive thing is
not in this video. And again, it's not
speaking about graphic things. That's not what gets
this label. They put it on that dramatically
suppressed the reach because it was exploding.
Rightly so.
That's Twitter censoring, as we've talked about many
times.
So the point is Casey, on that point,
says the this is another example. He has
a post that he put out, and it
says a small taste of Israeli settler colonial
barbarism that predates October 7th.
And it says sensitive content. The author
labeled this post as containing sensitive content. No.
He didn't.
He says that's a lie. They most definitely
put that label on themselves. And he says
this proves what I was just saying about
this. And that's the point is that's dramatically
reduces what you see.
The reach on that goes away.
Right? And that is the ultimate point, guys.
It's about suppressing content.
So I think that's important. And he goes
through and scrolls and shows you.
Oh, and this was interesting, by the way.
Yeah. This might have changed. I put this
out earlier as I do sometimes saying setting
up the daily wrap up for today.
Now I know that we're being suppressed, like,
it it's it's very clear. And by the
way, we already saw this. I should've grabbed
that to include, but I could I don't
I don't wanna do it now. Where the
it got briefly, Grok ended up exposing that
they had all these labels on the different
accounts. I had more than literally anybody.
60 plus. I think it was 60 or
60 I think it was actually just 60.
Labels on my account. And of all the
people out there, many of them
speak who are censored.
Highlighting that not even close. And they were
arbitrary labels that were put on my account
to bog it down, to censor it, to
put it in the corner. That's what they're
doing. That's not even that's not even freedom
of speech not reach kind of game. That's
just straight up censorship.
They do this on purpose and we all
know it if we're being honest with ourselves.
My point is I put this out and
I pinned it to the very top. Let's
just see, it probably blew up now since
I'm gonna make the point. But as of
right before I went live, it had one
like on it. Now, see, I would personally
not mean anything, but I think it's really
weird for those to see the that's not
what you would expect on our platform or
really anybody's. Let's see if it went up.
No. That mean that is really crazy to
me. I gotta be honest. Now I'll tell
you right now, as you circle back, if
I if I retweet
it, which only does is throw it back
in the timeline, I'm willing to bet you
it'll start getting engagement. But how is it
possible that people who subscribe to this channel
who I are constantly,
many of them I see nonstop engaging with
our threat, wouldn't have seen this pinned to
the top? Again, subjective. My personal opinion.
But I think you all sense that, especially
if you're paying attention to this, that there's
a lot of this going on. Just straight
up
shadow banning, suppression, hiding particular posts, removing videos
that just so happen to show crimes being
committed in Israel. Right?
So let's come back to it and see.
Now, WikiLeaks put something out. Now, I'm not
gonna really touch so much just based on
time today around the Telegram overlap, but I
I've actually spoke a lot about that on
recent shows. I was on, I don't know,
since I since I have been doing the
show show recently in the last, like, 3
days, I was doing I've been on a
lot of radio shows. And I I was
talking about it because it brought it came
up. The one point I wanna make sure
we don't miss is that I think it's
very obvious despite sort of some portion of
the of the controlled structure wanting to make
you think it's somebody outside and that the,
like, republican Elon Musk kind of structure is
the ones fighting against all of the guys
censoring. It's it's the same thing you're trying
to do with with all of it, France
and UK. It's far more complicated than what
they want you to think it is because
frankly, I don't think they're even remotely on
the side of fighting for free speech.
But overall, we should care in any sense
that somebody like that is being attacked
for you allowing you to speak freely.
My point is that anything like a bit
shoot, for example, or Telegram,
if it's actually free speech, you're going to
find pretty undistasteful things. That's what free speech
will look like. You'll find the worst type
of speech because it's allowed and protected.
They're not breaking a law. They're allowed to
say what they want even it's disgusting. That's
what free speech is. So you're going to
find those things, but a lot of times
they're abused and, like, meant and people spam
it with bad things to make it look
worse than it really is because they don't
like the free speech zone. They're trying to
get that out of your view. But Telegram
is an important one to protect. But I
also wanna point out, don't forget, Israel just
got called got caught for using it to
identify
where, I'm blanking on his name, the person
they recently assassinated in Tehran. They they're the
ones that posted about that. So there's clearly
an issue there that I'm not talking about
censorship. But to consider why
some people might want it more controlled than
I think the US State Department, without question,
is involved in what's going on there despite
some of the narratives.
But I want you to just consider that
this is not so much, you know, the
way that it's being presented in the 2
party illusion, I think, is simply dishonest. And
I think I mean, even I I think
he was just recently speaking about this. I
think it was on the Tucker interview about
how they were trying to coerce him before.
And that's not and the game is always
to view that as, like, Biden's administration.
And it's, guys, it's it's not the reality
of how this works. So, yes, there's obvious
differences in administrations.
But if we
if you to see it as your government
doing this and looking at the track record
that left, right ultimately means nothing when you
look at the the way they've been doing
this about with every topic. I mean, literally
everything. It's just one linear continuation of what
they've been trying to accomplish. You'll begin to
see that it's just what they would have
done no matter who was there. It had
been framed with a different flavor. That's also
all I'll say. And the point is we
should care.
Like I said about anybody. Like, look, for
Alex Jones, for example, and what happened around
Sandy Hook. You know my opinions around the
entire platform, but I would still stand and
defend his right to say whatever he wants
around these things because that's what free speech
actually is.
Now this is why it relates. WikiLeaks put
this out, a Horetz
article. Anti Israel hackers stole troves of sensitive
Israeli data. Now it's funny how this isn't
being included in this conversation right now. And
they're now publishing gigabytes
of secret and classified information,
some of which are on these social media
platforms. And it says, unable to stop the
hacks,
Israel is waging a futile war against these
leaks. And here's the the title of this
article is, after Iran steals sensitive Israeli data,
our Israel tries to censor the Internet.
My point about all of this is it's
not just that there are people that are
trying to make it all about Israel. We
have to realize that Israel is making it
all about Israel. They are involved in all
of these discussions and the
the willful ignorance to ignore that.
Or or rather make people like us who
are highlighting
because it is the reality that they're involved
somehow hateful against Israel. It's just it's it
is dishonest.
The truth is that this whether this is
be connected to Telegram or not, this is
the larger conversation and we can see who
the censorship industrial complex is tied back to.
And it's not left or right. It's power
structures. I think that's important to think about.
Oh, and then one other thing I didn't
know just wanna include. I thought this was
interesting. I recently pointed out this fake Telegram
channel or excuse me, Rumble channel that was
made. It's just the last American Vagabond 1.
17 followers apparently. And I've I've already seen
them commenting pretending to be me because you
can't see the one in some cases or
you really just it's hard to see.
Look when this was made.
I just find that I'm telling you, I'm
not gonna jump to conclusions
about whether it's the the lawfare that I'm
dealing with and the attacks of the, you
know, lawsuits about thing. It's just everything
has com exponentially
increased by the true definition of the word
since October 7th. Now I've been talking about
Israel for a long time.
What's funny is October 8th, this channel was
created and ever I just think that I've
seen a clear increase there. I just thought
that was interesting on the note of censorship
and so on. Let's see if this already
went up.
Like one, not much more. I find that
strange, quite frankly. Usually, these get a lot
of engagement. Anyway, we'll look back later. Not
important, by the way. But let's get into
some of these real conversations. So what we're
gonna talk about right now is in in
really reasonably quick succession, hopefully. We're gonna just
show you some of the things currently going
on. The reality,
despite what you have with your political standing,
left, right, seeing through it all,
that what Israel is doing is objectively bad.
Not just bad. It's objectively terror.
It is terrorism.
In every stretch, in every definition of the
word, no matter how you bend it, that's
what they're doing right now.
And no matter how you think, how bad
even if every single thing Israel's ever said
is true,
what they're doing is still genocide.
That's not my opinion. That's a the reality
of international law.
So what I wanna show you is what
is currently happening just over the last so
many days to bring that into
the unnerving reality
that everybody,
again, maybe say for Jill Stein, and I
say maybe just because I don't trust any
of these people, are all blindly,
not just supporting Zionism or supporting Israel, but
openly almost declaring
that the war will go on should they
be in power.
I don't know why that is. I I
almost thought about framing the show today as
something like,
woah. Woah. I just I just lost it.
What was it? That,
the point was that all they all want
the war to go on no matter what.
I just lost it anyway. The point is
that that is alarming to me. That we
have a situation where pretty much every single
person you can look to is promoting the
the glorification
and sup and and,
continuity
of this ongoing genocide while clearly
the majority of the world, and that's not
up for debate, is calling this as it
is? How does that even possibly make sense
without some really unnerving
understanding there that this is control
or blackmail or something else?
It's terrifying to me that we did some
people are either refusing to acknowledge it, don't
care, or won't see it, or can't.
It's it's it really is an unnerving thing
because of how clear this all is.
Now Tiberias pointed this out, and we're gonna
make a quick point about Lebanon and Hezbollah.
He says Palestine has a right to defend
itself. And this is to say he's making
a point, anybody, everywhere, has a right to
defend themselves. That's reality. So does Israel. Everyone
has a right to defend themselves in a
objective kind of general reality.
Lebanon, he says, has a right to defend
itself. Yemen has a right to defend itself.
Syria, Iran, they have the right to defend
themselves.
And if anybody's gonna make any points about
that, you don't just get to say that
only one dynamic works or because we deemed
you bad guy doesn't apply,
Israel can bomb the location where no matter
what how you think is justified or not
and they're not allowed to in the moment
they're gonna respond even though they weren't planning
on immediately, the action is we express restraint
because if you did, it would be a
war a terror attack, which is basically the
narrative we got. He goes on to say,
though, despite all of them having the legal
right to defend themselves, this is the one
caveat and it applies to an occupier.
And it's not just because we wanna say
that because of Israel right now.
Well before this conversation, that was the static
reality.
If you're occupying an area,
you don't have the right to defend yourself.
It's it's the point of Fort Geneva Convention
and the right of armed resistance. Now I
I should've finished the sentence. It doesn't mean
in any context.
But when you're fighting the person that is
occupied by you,
the legal right to defense goes out the
window. And it says under international law, Israel
does not and this has been acknowledged by
UN members, by international law experts, lawyers.
Israel does not have the right to defend
itself from territories it occupies.
It's a simple reality. And if you could
look it up, it doesn't matter because you
wanna support one side or the other. If
you care about the law as Israel pretends
it's doing, then that should matter to you.
So the point in all of that is
that Lebanon is one of those groups, and
Israel is illegally occupying Lebanon.
It's very easy to prove. Same with Syria,
the Golan Heights. Same with Palestine in general.
Same with Egypt.
We're talking to the corridor right now. It's
just specifically throughout history. It's not a new
thing.
The point
is that Robert just wrote an excellent article.
Hezbollah and Hamas by the way, I spoke
about this on a radio show recently, hit
Tel Aviv.
Israel says it launched preemptive strikes on Lebanon.
How embarrassing this game they play about preemptive
strikes. No. That's called an attack. That's what
it's called.
But the point here, Hezbollah
clear and look. You can go back a
while and show things that, you know, it's
hard to pinpoint the starting point for how
long this has been going on. But clearly,
in an objective way, you can see that
this skirmish, it clearly started because of Israel's
actions. And then on top of it, whatever
you think, they're illegally occupying Lebanon, so same
point applies.
The point though is that they fired all
these locations, hit in provably hit civilian targets.
Lebanon responded by hitting
illegal settlements and military installations, all of which
would be considered
legal targets because they have given
legal official capacity
to these illegal settlers.
That's Israel's choice to make them a military
target. They gave them official capacity. They're armed.
They're acting under a level of the military
structure. So the point in all of that
is to say that they bombed back,
and it was a very successful attack. It
hit middle many locations, and Israel's been trying
to hide that. Now that is clearly going
to be, I think, exposed either way, I
think, because of things like Hezbollah are is
saying, you better acknowledge what happened or we're
going to strike again. Now Robert predicts that
Israel, and maybe it's already happening right now,
is going to strike again to try to
bury all of this in order to try
to drive the US to step in, which
is the only point.
Israel will it simply is not capable of
fighting
even Hamas, it seems, without the support of
the US and is still losing. So the
idea is that they desperately need the US
to step in in order to make this
something other than their destruction. And even then,
it seems like that's most likely what's happening
here or the removal of all the power
structure, essentially. However you wanna look at it,
they're failing in what they're doing.
And Hamas, which is the second important point,
fired from within a Gaza. Now you didn't
hear this damn near anywhere. You know why?
Because it's important for the narrative to show
that they have just deconstructed
Hamas. Right? What have they been doing for
10 months? If Hamas is able to fire
from one of the areas they say they
control
and hit specifically with higher level weaponry, which
shows you not only they've able to conceal
not just some flimsy rockets without aim, like
some legitimate ability to fight, which Robert has
been telling you the whole time they've been
holding back, but also that they were able
to do this in a way that did
get through their system from Hamas
inside of Gaza, which they are destroying.
I mean, what else do you need to
see? What they're doing, guys, is just destroying
everything in the area, destroying houses, murdering women
and children, raping and torturing.
I I frankly don't even think it has
anything to do with focusing on Hamas other
than they're just destroying whatever they come across.
We can see that they are
the bottom line, again, I I I always
get pulled into the point. I I wanna
get to the next point. That ultimately, it
shows you that Lebanon and and Hamas and
the rest of the people that are pushing
back against Israel's genocidal war are not even
remotely
at to the to the what's the word
for it? They are not losing. Put it
that way.
And I think it's important to understand the
dynamic. I'm worried that the US government will
get pulled in or that Israel will take
a very, very belligerent dangerous action that they
can't take back, which will force their supporters
who are, what, clearly complicit, to step in
either way. I worry about some kind of
a larger attack, whatever that may mean.
Now Robert simply highlighting this in the 25th.
Hamas had a military base in Tel Aviv
with m 90 rockets. The air defenses failed
to intercept the rockets, and one directly struck
a target.
11 months of all out war on Gaza
and Al Qasim can still hit Tel Aviv
with ease. Huge failure failure for the Israelis.
Now this just happened on 26th, which was
yesterday, an Israeli airstrike against the village of
Tirharfa
in southern Lebanon.
So what their response is what Robert said
when he predicted, another bombing of a civilian
location. That's what they do, you understand? They're
hoping, which is clearly not going to work,
that if they just keep murdering innocent people
that they might stop doing this.
But the reality is they're very aware, which
is what Israel projects on everybody else, that
they're like this. That these the military of
Israel, the government of Israel is belligerently genocidal
and are willing to hurt, murder, and torture,
and rape.
That's not object it's objectively true today. And
so would they they recognize that
if they don't stop them, that it's only
gonna have more opportunities in the future for
this to keep happening. And let's not forget,
they're illegally occupied, so this entire thing is
illegal from Israel's perspective no matter how you
spin it. But so here's what Tiberias put
out.
Israel rapes and massacres entire families, commits more
war crimes than the media can keep up
with. As I said, the most honest statement
there there of all day,
Bombs 7 countries on the same day with
Western support.
Paul Western politicians?
Silence.
1 of Israel's victims,
we will retaliate.
Western politicians, we urge restraint.
This is what we're this is the absurd
clown show that we are seeing.
Now on that note, let's talk about the
current daily, like, as of yesterday, today, what's
going on in Israel,
and how it's possible that anybody could pretend
this is not the most gruesome thing we've
ever seen.
Sarah Wilkerson.
And by the way, it's also something interesting
to see how some of these never show
images or flush out the data. I'm telling
you that these are small suppression tactics.
There it goes. The Israelis kill some 70
Palestinian people in just 24 hours, causing the
death toll to surge to 40,334
that we can prove, right, that we can
verify rather, because the amount of people that
we know are dead but can't truly verify
is a whole another aspect. And the injury
toll increased to 93,356.
This is on the 25th.
Every day this happens. One day,
murdering plenty of people
in real time.
And the conversation is I mean, are they
even giving you a narrative anymore?
Is there even like, oh, well, Hamas was
there, or tunnels, or Human Shield. Well, they
just don't even care. It's it's just drifting
into the background, especially since the election is
starting to take care of all the attention.
Oh, and that's what I was gonna say
earlier, actually. You could've framed this as, you
know,
got Israel's genocide
is the most important topic regard in regard
how I was gonna frame it. Like, in
regard to the election coming up,
it's amazing how there are a lot of
people oh, I get it. They're we're talking
about US and what's going on in our
lives immediately.
But even then, how is it possible that
we can't see how what's going on there
directly affects us?
In so many ways, it makes my head
spin.
The idea of like, again, generally speaking that
the Israeli genocide and really more so your
government, either side's support for it, should be
the primary vote the point in this 2024
election. And frankly, I kinda think that it
is no matter what they end up saying.
That seems to be the central point they
don't want us talking about, yet seems to
be on everyone's minds around it all.
And this is why.
It's not just because it is a genocide
of an entire civilization that we should care
about because we're human beings with compassion, but
it also should matter that your governments are
literally the lifeblood of why this is happening.
Your tax dollars are being used to do
this.
How is that not an American issue?
But, of course, because people who are invested
in the status quo and the 2 party
illusion want you to think we're children,
naive for pretending this matters.
Why don't you just pick the other evil?
Come on, Ryan. Grow up.
It's it's it's almost hard. You can't I
can't even say that without laughing. It's unreal
that there are people projecting that, presenting that,
as somehow the balanced adult view in the
room.
Especially with all that we know. All the
different examples of being cheated and lying and
and voting machine manipulation
and just flat out
illusion of any kind of voting process. That
makes that real to me. Anyway,
Mohammed Safa points out that Israel has dropped
almost 80,000 tons of explosives.
This means that Israel has dropped, now get
this, 36
kilograms of explosives
on Gaza
for every single man, woman, and child.
Think about that. And for the show, not
on the podcast, take a look at what
it actually looks like.
36
kilograms of explosives for every single person that
exists in this area.
I mean, god, that is just
unreal.
Eunice Sarawy has a great thread here, which
I hope you'll take the time to read
through.
He says, what happened yesterday
in Palestine?
Yesterday. Now this is the 25th he's talking
about.
Israeli military bombs in Gaza, kills dozens, including
women and children. Executes a 15 year old
with a sniper, which happens constantly in Miwasi,
in the safe zone.
Unleash settlers in a mass attack in a
Bethlehem village, killing 1, and strikes in Tukaram,
killing 5 people.
North Gaza, 3 Palestinians are bombed while on
Hocha Street in Jabali refugee camp. The target
was a food stall.
Two passerbys and the owner of the stall
were killed. No tunnel to be seen. No
human shield. Just, you know, food. Can't have
that.
7 people were killed in Gaza City by
Israel fire while
fishing.
I even had that coming up. I'll show
you. I mean, this it's like the whole
thing.
Same neighborhood over here, you got 3 people
killed, 3 or 3
the, attack was on the family
that left 3 killed, 2 killed in an
apartment building.
Israel military targets a house in West Gaza
near a patient's friend medical center
striking in,
Alijie residence and killing 5 civilians.
Among them were a father and 4 children,
3 of whom were his own, all sheltering
in the house.
Yeah. You're not gonna hear this
tying it back to their Twitter accounts where
they boast about it or their Telegram or
their Instagram
or their
TikTok.
Sharing it, laughing about it, high fiving about
it. I'll show you an example next.
Sarah Wilkinson shows this from the 26th
yesterday.
Israel's Israeli
Israel bombs a crowded street market, and guess
what?
Jibreel refugee camp. They they just nonstop.
Isn't this supposed to be somewhere they've already
cleared, that they controlled, they bombed relentlessly already?
They let them come back and rebuild and
they bomb them again?
North of Gaza, murdering at least 3 Palestinian
civilians and causing panic.
You can look for yourself. There's no indication
of tunnels or human shields. They've already done
what they were doing in this area.
They're not even trying to explain it. They're
just torturing these people.
Vanessa Bili, speaking of that torture, shows you
some horrifying
images.
This is what US bombs do to Palestinian
bodies on an hourly basis. We're we talked
about recently the butterfly bullets or the expanding
bullets. They use on the regular, which we
can verify, in some cases they boast about,
internationally illegal munitions. And we're not even talking
about chemical weapons like white phosphorus or biological
manipulation they use with the gas they use.
Nope. We're talking about weapons that are documented
to be illegal because they maximize suffering, usually
don't even kill in most cases because they
blow off your
arm, unless, I guess, you're shot in the
in the chest and so on. But the
idea being that they're meant to maim.
I mean, I even take it back because
at the end of the day, any bullet
all sets would kill, I think, in the
same way. But the point is they're meant
to maximize immediate suffering.
That's how they're designed.
Israel
primarily uses that.
That's and and it with the bombs they
use, the way they deploy them, guys, this
has been documented
by human rights groups for decades.
You know, if you're only just hearing about
this, ask yourself why.
These images should haunt every citizen of every
country complicit in genocide.
Ask yourselves. Is genocide being normalized? And if
the answer is yes, ask yourself why.
15 year old Dia al Adani
from Daya Daya Al Bala, Gaza dreamed of
being a photographer,
injured in an Israeli strike that severed both
of his arms.
He still hopes to pursue his passion with
pro prosthetic arms.
Daya is one of the tens of thousands
of Palestinian children who lost their limbs to
Zionist air strikes during the ongoing genocide in
Gaza and all occupied territories.
Sad.
Here's the fisherman we were talking about. 7
Palestinian fishermen were killed. This was on the
26th. An Israeli drone strike off the coast
of Gaza. The fishermen were attempting to get
some fish for their families. Israel continues to
blockade the strip. Right? So we're being told
that we're not restricting food, we're just stopping
if we're going to Hamas. But here are
fishermen trying to feed their families, and you
shoot them. Why? Because they're trying to get
food.
Try you do your best to try to
reconcile those two things, and you tell me
they're not trying to stop them from eating.
It's the same it's always been. I don't
need to convince you guys. It's embarrassing
that anybody out there, the ridiculous clowns like
Ben Shapiro of the world that are belligerently,
like, like, almost enjoying how they know they're
lying about how obvious this is. Anyone trying
to pretend that this is the most moral
army in the world, you should never forget
that they are not what they seem. This
is not a one issue thing, guys. This
is a principle thing. This is about who
they truly are.
If you can pretend that this many things
are obviously the opposite of what they are.
Benazibile.
And I just made this point about the
tents.
Multiple force displacements by genocidal Zionist forces have
resulted in Palestinian city tent cities
on beaches
west of Khanunis in Gaza. They pushed them
from the safe areas into basically the water.
Tanks right behind them, boats actually firing on
them from the water. There's multiple videos of
this. Helicopters, quadcopters, jets all above them, firing
when they see fit.
Death in every direction. No escape.
Sweltering heat. No food. No clean water. No
sanitation. No diggity. No safety.
Welcome to the Gaza genocide.
This is absolute torture.
Then the point is
or I mean, this is the image I
just showed the other day. As I made
the point the same, Palestinian families are literally
being pushed into the sea. Remember when they
kept telling you that? All the leaders of
Israel were saying push them into the sea,
drive them into the ocean. Well, there you
go.
Because the limit of the safe area is
now down to just 35 square kilometers
for millions of people
with no water, no food.
I mean, it's just I mean, it is
the worst
one of the worst parts of this is
the pretend that this is not as bad
as it is. The idea that this is
not not this is it's not just genocide.
It's torture.
Like, they are laughing about what they're doing
to these people, getting joy out of watching
them suffer because they're telling you that. They're
high fiving about it.
The point here
is that then they bomb these tents.
That's what this is. Lots of videos going
around, and this is on the 21st.
To ma so called safe zone and lord
largest displacement persons camp in southern Gaza, there
was an advance by the occupation forces in
the eastern region. At the same time, gunfire
was fired from warships,
in the ocean.
So you drive them to the ocean,
the shore,
then you bomb the shore, fire at them
from the ocean, watch them flee in every
direction without anywhere to go because there is
nowhere else to go, and we don't call
that what it is?
I mean, why if you're just if you
wanted to just you could just murder all
of them.
You're clearly getting away with it. This is
to watch them suffer. They are clearly doing
this for a reason, and it could just
be to kind of minimize the visual reality
of absolute murder.
But at the same time, again, like I
keep saying
oh, well, I thought I had it right
there. Here.
They're high fiving about it, guys. I mean,
this is everywhere. It's one example. But realize,
as I said, only monsters and the willfully
ignorant are still standing by the Zionist Israeli
rulership.
This is a video that's been going around.
You know why? Because it's been posted by
an IDF member. As Janis Tarawi and plenty
of others have called out. An Israeli occupation
soldier uploaded footage of himself
dapping,
handshaking,
another soldier in celebration right beside the body
of a Palestinian civilian that he just killed.
I mean, I don't even have the words
for how so psychopathic that is.
And I don't even you can't even argue
that these people have been so dehumanized that
they just can't recognize it. Human beings,
I don't think I think at some level,
you there's not this is who you are.
If you're able to do something personally, my
opinion.
That's my point. They're posting this on social
media, and we're not supposed to pretend be
I mean, we we're just supposed to ignore
that this is an obvious action,
deliberate torture.
And here's another example. Remember the World Central
Kitchen conversation as they pretended despite the fact
they bombed, I think it was 2 or
3 cars in a
row? That they bombed the car, they got
out another car, they bombed the next car.
All of them visually marked.
They said, oopsie, we didn't mean to murder
those were health care the aid workers.
And the US government pained her to the
lie about the whole thing. According to Matt
Miller, they're still investigating it. We'll get back
to you. We'll follow-up with the issue. We'll
raise the issue. Right?
But guess what?
On August 24th, injuries have been reported among
the staff of the World Central Kitchen.
You know why? They bombed their headquarters.
Oops.
As I said, so much for the accident
narrative, As they're targeting World Central Kitchen.
3, 2, 1, Hamas. They're working for Hamas.
Just wait.
It's probably already being said. A guarantee it's
being floated by all the sycophants online or
the bots they're using to justify why it
somehow makes sense to pretend that you accidentally
targeted them to then bomb their headquarters.
It it's just so transparent.
Daniel Lemotis points out a story that's been
going around that's obvious.
And it it's it's like the in the
countless examples of them pretending to give water
to a woman, and you find out they
shot her afterward. There's been so many examples
like that. It makes me
it makes me pain for the reality of
I mean, I I used I mean, I
I always know that there's bad people in
the world.
But this whole experience has shown me that
there is real evil in this world. Now
I've known that to a degree, but, like,
you just wonder. I mean, this is transparent.
I mean, they're showing you who they are.
In this case,
a Palestinian woman,
pregnant woman, and a man, his wife, rather
the pregnant woman is his wife and the
man with her, they were hanged to death
by Israel.
Thrown on a rooftop
to demonstrate to the rest of people what
they're gonna do.
I mean, it's again, these are everywhere.
Everywhere.
Matt Kennard.
He says it's so it's so bad that
even CNN are reporting it. My point, that's
opportunism. They recognize that they're no they're gonna
lose everything if they stick out the genocide.
So they're gonna give you some truth. Still
trying to panor to Israel when they can.
Here's what they say. This is on the
23rd August. It's the truth.
Children are drinking from puddles and wading through
sewage pools
as Israel pummels water systems in Gaza.
Yeah. I guess the old narrative has it
out of the way. Right? Oh, it's all
Hamas. No. No. It's not.
Not even remotely.
Now, again,
I'm only gonna play one of these. I
just wanna make a point about one they
said. But I want make sure you check
this out because this it was I mean,
this blew up within minutes, and then immediately
got labeled, and then it's barely grown since.
That's how this works. These are videos that
are shocking. Any one of these alone
should blow your mind.
And I'm not saying you blindly have to
trust every doctor. The point is that it's
it's you can see what's going on there
and then you can see these doctors coming
back and telling you what they're seeing, And
there are an endless amount of them. I
just added multiple more. I think it was
8 more today.
More doctors, more day by day coming home
and saying, genocide. I mean, they're they're shooting
children in the head. I'm watching their children
get attacked. They're torturing. They're raping. They're stealing.
Everyone, everything you're hearing, they're
explicitly telling you is happening.
Make sure you share these. There's a reason
they didn't want this going around because most
people,
this will convince them. Because it should. Because
it's real. It's what's happening. Now one of
the videos I wanna play is from this
guy talking about organ trafficking, organ harvesting, because
that's happening. It's obvious.
What is take
Oops.
It it captured. And when they've returned to
them, they've had all this all been harvesting.
So they've they've they've seen the evidence that
happens. Israel itself has said, for example, that
they have the largest skin bank Mhmm.
Throughout the world, and that much of that
skin is taken and harvested from the bodies
of their prisoners of their victims.
True. What we see is we live in
a world in which everything is commodified.
It's true. I mean, we've talked about this
many times. And all the different overlaps to,
like like, that's what he's talking about is,
like, the public part of it where they
act like there's some legal there is a
dark darker side of this where we've proven
this. In networks in the world, which I'll
play for you next, taking advantage of war
zones, we've talked about a lot. Now it's
not just organ trafficking. And I'm not gonna
say in this moment, we can highlight this
explicitly to Israel. I do know there's an
overlap. My point is that we also see,
in a general sense, in war zones, human
trafficking.
Syria made a big point about this, about
all the missing children. So all and my
point is to recognize that people like this
if people entities that are willing to use
war zones like Ukraine to harvest organs from
people that are, in some cases, alive because
they're so desperate. I mean, like willing so
willing to do so. We saw Rudy Giuliani
boast about this in regard to Iran. Remember
the clip where he goes, this is what
makes a good regime change, that their sanctions
have driven them to sell their organs. He
literally said that. I don't think he knew
that would get out. So the point is
the same. That they they're taking advantage of
situations to take organs. And you what else
do you think they're capable of? But there's
a doctor telling you, as of the many
different examples we've seen, and this is one
of the, articles,
that they're doing this. We saw this one,
Al Shefa. These are again, the point is
these are doctors from other parts of the
world who are there and saw it happen.
Israel's open secret of Palestinian organ theft. Happens
all the time.
Now we've also talked about the human shields
open for the the the I mean, everything
seems to be an open secret about what
Zionism really is and what they're doing.
But here is a video expat buys put
out. Now it's a it's a clip that
was put out around regarding the Ukraine war
and forward, Telling you that at least by
that report, they were taking organs from people
in Ukraine.
In Israel, who had ordered them in advance.
On Friday, Ukrainian authorities arrested a dozen people,
most of them Israelis, for taking part in
the scheme. The network which mostly sought kidneys
paid as much as 10,000 US dollars per
body part. The organs were then sold for
over $200,000.
Ukraine's interior ministry says most of the organ
donors were impoverished young women. This is not
the first time that reports have surfaced implicating
Israelis in organ trafficking.
Last year, a Swedish journalist published an article
claiming that Israeli soldiers
killed young Palestinians
for their organs.
It's the
Well, isn't that interesting?
Now,
obviously, people are they want to dismiss that
because they don't they say, oh, press TV.
It's gonna be, you know, it's it's what's
hilarious about things like that, it's a sound
of the topic we're just talking on the
beginning.
That it's the the information is what should
matter. And I'm just using this to make
a point because the obvious reality, if you
care to look,
is unbelievably obvious. I cover it in the
show. The information is everywhere. There's there's been
so many examples of both just generally Israelis
getting caught in trafficking organizations,
Oregon and people, but then specifically
intelligence agencies,
Mossad, the elements of that, or just specifically
even people that are part to hide the
Israeli government.
And we realized Epstein himself was tied according
to Acosta to Mossad and CIA.
There's a gay there's there's a clear overlap
to all of this. The point in showing
you this is just to see how dark
this really is, what they're actually doing.
Now wait. Please make sure you share this
doctor thread. I think it's important to get
this out because it will reach people.
Now as I said,
as they sit here and high five and
do a little handshake around the dead person,
only monsters in the willfully ignorant are actually
standing by the Zionist
government.
Now as BM points out, for those that
are saying, oh, he was a terrorist. Right?
He was a Hamas member.
Assuming you actually could know that somehow.
The point is that we've shown without a
question that they see every Palestinian
as a terrorist.
Now this I'm I'm not gonna say literally
every Israeli, but we have to see that
it's,
explicitly made clear that the the Israeli government
and and the military, the IDF, are openly
telling you this. They say this on air
I've I've I the only ones I've seen
saying the opposite are the ones that end
up whistleblowing.
That doesn't mean I'm I'm sure that this
exists somewhere. But realize that this is a
very clear majority.
And this is an example of that. As
he says and remember, BM is is a
as he as he says, an anti Zionist
Hebrew from Israel who's hauling this stuff out.
He says, this is what mister,
Badza
how do you say that? Badza,
who is a resident of Baqo al Gurbai,
sees every day when he goes in and
out of his workplace parking lot, which is
located in a Jewish town.
Right? So we're talking about a location in
Israel where he is is is is a
Palestinian,
and he is working and coming. So he
has all of the allowance to be there,
or most likely in his Israeli has Israeli
citizenship, which I think most of them do
are all do that actually are able to
be there. I well, I forget. Anyway, the
point is he's Palestinian. And he's allowed to
be there because he's coming and going and
working in these locations.
Right? So that means that he's not a
Hamas member. They're he is a guy who's
literally working in their homes or doing the
grunt work, which is usually how they utilize
people in these areas.
And every time he comes and goes from
this Jewish town, it literally says on the
screen,
bon voyage, Abu Sayed, the terrorist.
Or when he gets there, welcome, Abu Sayed,
the terrorist.
Yeah. But come on. Clean my house now.
Come on in and do your work in
this area,
terrorist.
You know why? Because it's just a derogatory
term because they think all Palestinians are terrorists.
So when you go back and realize that
they're murdering all the terrorists, they say they're
murdering all the Palestinians.
It says many Palestinian citizens in of Israel
working in Jewish towns have been facing threats,
discrimination, harassment, since October 7th.
And it's far worse than that, guys.
Here's even Human Rights Watch, who just made
a massive report on 26th about what we've
all been seeing. Everyone trying to downplay the
Sid Tienan rape scandal. And really, what we
now realize bay and this is a prime
a central part in that realization, that it
is not one location or one bad apple.
It is a systematic
forced rape, or rather just rape situation.
They are deliberately raping these people. Let's not
forget, we saw the guy on Israeli media,
one of the leading shows,
proudly,
aggressively arguing that we need to make this
systematic.
That way, they'll know if you do an
October 7th, we're gonna rape you. And if
you do anything wrong, this is what's gonna
happen to you. He was arguing. He was
pushing back. Some of the people came in
and said, that's not what he really means.
They go, yes, I do. We should be
raping them. Very clear. We saw people like
Gavir and Smoker say, that's their they should
be allowed to. We saw them have riots
saying that they should be allowed to rape
them if they're not Jewish.
This is what actually happened. Human Rights Watch
covers it all. On top of that, that
they prove that it was not just this
one example.
As the title says, Israel, Palestinian healthcare workers,
al Hamas,
Random Palestinians
tortured.
And, guys,
it is the worst thing you can imagine.
I mean, it really is something that I
never I don't even wanna go the the
disgusting nature of what they're doing, it'll sit
with me forever.
Here's one example. And read it if you
wanna understand what's going on. And you guys
know based on what I said, what the
show is about. But read it in your
own time if you wanna truly understand the
depth of evil we're talking about. Here's one
example. From Ravi Abdul from the human rights
group,
EuroMed human rights work, human rights,
EuroMed what was it again? I'm getting all
confused in my head. Human EuroMed human rights
monitor. Excuse me.
Quote, 3 soldiers took turns
raping him with an m sixteen rifle.
No one else knew, but he told me
as a paramedic.
He was terrified. His mental health was awful.
He started talking to himself.
They are breaking these people down.
This is this is the Guantanamo Bay stuff,
guys. This is where it came this is
the overlap.
There are so many examples like this. It
makes it's just
again, it's that dreadful reality that this is
in the world.
These people exist.
Now Rami Aria points out chilling United Nations
Security Council briefing from Save Our Children's Operations
lead in emergency health unit in Gaza.
Another doctor.
Am I it says, am told it's the
first briefing the security council has received via
video from the strip since the war began,
posted on 22nd.
It says speech focused
excuse me. Speech focus was on polio,
but this quote stands out as well. Quote,
our protect our protection teams in Gaza are
working with children
released from the Israeli military detention system.
Children.
These children report
sexual violence,
including rape.
They report being denied food, beaten,
attacked by dogs. Everything we're hearing. Don't forget
one of the worst parts of this, we've
a human rights, Yirr Ahmed Mader, proved they
were using dogs who were trained to rape
people.
That is the kind that is the the
peak that is so psychopathic.
Terrifying.
It says they report being denied food, attacked
by dogs. They report seeing their parents stripped
and beaten in front of them. That's psychological
torture, guys. On top of real torture. These
children are struggling to cope with the profound
trauma and mental physical harm that this has
caused. They're trying to destroy these people for
the future.
As you keep hearing them say, well, they're
gonna grow up to be terrorists. We should
kill them now. That's their logic.
They're
they being the psychopathic Zionist maniacs we're discussing,
anyone that doesn't feel that way wouldn't be
in that category.
Now BM also points out the settler aspect
of this. And this person asked, do you
know who said Tianan?
You know, the the rape prison we're talking
about?
Rape in the name of god? It says
they are proud of it.
They are proud of their judo Nazi barbarism,
he calls it. These people can't be reasoned
with. The state of Israel can't be reasoned
with.
These settlers again, the point is as Beth
Salem
highlights
look at that.
I'm telling you guys, this is my point.
Oh, you're are we really gonna pretend like
they just can't translate that one? Oops.
Oops.
Good thing I've got the translator on here.
Here's what it says.
It's just so transparent to me how obvious
they're censoring.
It says, the settler Shem Lokesky sexually harasses
a Palestinian and implicitly threatens him with rape.
See?
I wonder why Twitter doesn't wanna send wanna
wanna translate that for you. The point is,
you can watch them.
They're not only saying we should be able
to rape, they're saying it's good, as it
says before,
in the name of god.
What kind of god are we talking about
here? What kind of religion are we talking
about here when you're rationalizing that you're allowed
to rape people?
I mean, guys, this is a problem.
And again, if you speak of Jews of
the world, they'll they'll tell you that's not
the what they believe. Because it's not. And
there's plenty of weird things in any religion
you'll find that people the point is whether
it's Christians or Muslims, the reality is,
are rooted in the idea
of morals and kindness and compassion.
And, yes, you'll find things in the bible
or any of them that are explicit and
crazy.
But we all go, yeah. But that's not
it's not who we are today or whatever.
So the idea that we're pretending
that this is Judaism.
It's not a Zionism
that are bastardizing this. These people are have
lost themselves to this cultish mentality.
And and there's things like this in Christianity.
Things like this in in any religion. You'll
find people I mean, let's not forget. People
in the KKK
murdered people in the name of Christendom. That's
what works it doesn't mean that's what Christians
believe.
There's a problem here and we shouldn't associate
it with anything other than what they are
and what they're doing.
Now this is just a side note that
we're seeing this in. You're not gonna hear
this on the corporate media. Ask yourself why.
This is today it's being reported.
If every
hint at some kind of a hate crime
towards somebody who might even be Jewish adjacent
or, you know,
whatever, somehow is the biggest story in all
of Queps or Mister Media. A Palestinian man
found dead in Belgium with his hands and
feet tied to a tree.
All these are fake claims of lynching, and
here we go.
A a weird how nobody wants to talk
about that. Clearly, I think this is being
normalized around the world.
Here's the report if you wanna watch it.
It's it's it's, in a in other language,
but
what the media hides broke give you the
media report from Belgium.
Mohammed Shehada points out, despite all of this,
your government in the United States, if you're
in the United States, just proudly sent the
500th
plane full of bombs to keep the genocide
going.
Israel receives the 500th US airlift in in
325
days.
Let that sink in.
Right? It it it at least 1 a
day, if not more a day.
Delivery ammunition, armaments, armored vehicles, protective equipment, and
more for the IDF to continue its war
of extermination.
You think they could continue this war without
everything they need that's coming from another country?
It says, remember when Biden said in May
he'd stop sending bombs to Israel if it
launched a Rafa invasion? Yeah. How'd that work
out? Now for everyone that wants to jump
on this and say, see? That's why Biden
is back. Well, yes. They yeah. I agree.
He is back. He's a war criminal. All
of them are. But if you think for
one second this is what the left would
do and the right's any different, you're this
is the point from the beginning.
We need to rec recognize
that every single one of them
are supporting this.
The continuation of this. Even even going as
far as Tulsi Gabbard at this point and
RFK, seeing as how they just leaned in
with the group who made it clear this
was going to continue.
There's no denying this, guys. Here is Trump's
campaign video that just went out. Let drink
this in.
Before 1,000 were brutally killed,
including Americans.
Before Iran helped Hamas plan the attack,
killing Americans.
Before
There is no evidence whatsoever
that that took place, that Iran helped them
plan whatever.
I wouldn't be surprised if it happened. I'm
saying that that's just a claim that's been
floated, so he's using it politically. Gotta love
the honesty there. Right? They didn't give 1,000,000,000
of taxpayers' money to Iran. Nope. That was
Iran's money that the US seized, and it's
a very easy thing to prove. But even
if if you don't agree with that, then
then say that. But don't you don't need
to lie about what the reality is. If
you just don't want them to have the
money that they could have used for terrorism,
if you think that way, then say that.
We stole their money because they would use
it for terrorism. The game of playing that
Biden gave them all this money, it's embarrassing
and people are being willfully ignorant
or truly trying to deceive others.
And and this this there's this is the
point we're making. You should care about whether
these are true or not, even if you
still wanna support them.
That's the point we're making about principles here.
Trump played hardball with Iran.
Destroyed ISIS.
Oh, he did, did he? The ISIS just
attacked Iran. Isn't that funny how it works?
ISIS multiple times just attacked Iran, declared Iran
as the as a p n like, think
about how ridiculous this all is. Hamas overlap.
They claim that they think they're I mean,
the idea is clearly that ISIS and Al
Qaeda, which we can prove, is a proxy
element of the west, guys. It's not up
for debate. If we're not grown up enough
to talk about adults in the room to
acknowledge that, which means left and right of
your just your government are supporting these things,
then you're not the adult in the room
because these receipts
are obvious. Whether it's Ben Swan's great documentary,
whether it's James Corbett's 3 part documentary, it's
undeniable.
Whether the proof of them shuttling them around
using all sorts of,
you know, tr- transports to move them country
to country, moving their families around.
Bit Netanyahu giving them medical treatment in Syria,
but, yeah, let's ignore it. Or how about
the fact that we see ISIS patches on
the Azov movement that they're funding in Ukraine?
But, yeah, we're all just a bunch of
children. We don't get it. Right?
Kept the Middle East at peace.
Oh, did he?
My god. Kept is out of endless wars.
No. No. We continued all of them. He
even just boasted about that. He just didn't
I didn't start anew, which is a lie,
but we ended them. No. You didn't. They're
all still going. Afghanistan wasn't ended by you
and it's not it's not even ended. The
point is that's all a big fabrication. His
his followers love saying that. But let's realize
both with
Iran
as well as I I what was the
the other example was
have a play the point was Iran was
import he assassinated Soleimani. That could've easily in
Venezuela was one of the others. There's a
third one I can't remember right now. They
could've spun out into a massive war if
Iran decided to respond.
Just Just because it didn't doesn't mean he
didn't start. That would've been an example. Or
the obvious coup attempt multiple times in Venezuela.
Why? But, I mean, in and of itself,
that should be considered a war field. The
point is, Sudan wasn't talked about. They bombed
all over Sudan. That wasn't a new the
point is all these examples
are lies.
I mean, in the sense of what they're
putting forward. Like, they're putting forward narratives about
Iran, about that that are easily proven to
be false. Hey. But it makes fun talking
points, doesn't it? Let's all lean into that.
Through strength.
History shows very plainly that Wars
through strength.
Is us out of endless wars. Kept us
out of endless wars through strength. I mean,
this game they play where, like, acting militarily
is your peace movement, it's it's Orwellian.
It's preemptive strikes. It's whatever they wanna pretend
is them doing the good thing while in
fact what they're doing is what they would
call terrorism if anybody else did it. Good
times.
Through strength.
History shows very plainly that evil only respects
one thing,
unyielding strength. When I'm back in the White
House, our enemies will know if you How's
that worked out so far?
He had 4 years to show his unyielding
strength. What happened? Oh, what about the war
on terror? Isn't that just nothing but belligerent
military action? Okay. So if the argument is
that strength in what they've done this whole
time is supposed to be the one thing
they respect, why didn't that change anything? In
fact, as we understand it, terrorism's more prouder
than ever. Now that in itself could be
a narrative. The point is that the claim
that
the the war the terrorism president at least
is more than it ever was before the
war on terror began,
which, I mean, they could argue it's a
miscalculation and blowback and, you know, you killed
them and their children become terror. Whatever you
wanna explain. It doesn't matter. The point is,
if that's your narrative,
what are you basing that on?
Like, the idea that somehow that because you're
going to bomb things, that they're just not
gonna do what they're gonna do, That's a
very naive reality when you understand that most
of the people they're calling terrorists are the
ones that are fighting against tyranny and oppression.
I'm not saying that there aren't terrorists. I'm
not even talking about ISIS or any of
that. I'm talking about the ones they always
focus on. Not their own people that they
fund, but the reality of things like Ansar
Allah movement or the or or, the,
Hezbollah or any number of popular groups that
have been chosen by their peoples that aren't
clean. They have their clear problems.
But the idea of pretending that
that you need to,
I don't know, just
bomb and murder and attack and and invade,
and that's gonna stop. Then you're driving that
reality.
Those people are going to fight back because
their whole war it's the idea of pretending
like if some if China just took Florida
or whatever, we would just go, well, you
know, we're gonna leave it be
because we don't wanna cut no. You're going
to fight back because they took something from
you. And then the point is if you're
gonna fight back,
if they just started shooting at you, are
you gonna go, woah, okay, never mind, you're
pretty strong?
Well, no. Because you're fighting for what's yours.
And this is an inherent concept in what
we believe we are as Americans, and we're
supposed to pretend that nobody else has that
value? They're not gonna stand up and fight
for what they believe in?
I mean, this is the naive reality that
the only thing they're doing is fighting terrorism.
And that is genuinely what they're all talking
to. Even Tulsi Gabbard. How are you leaning
in? Your entire premise was on stopping the
endless wars, and all you you lean in
with somebody who is championing the Israel genocide?
Because the narrative is you don't like wars?
Is that all we want, is just a
statement?
If you're saying you're gonna continue, which this
is showing you, the fight in the ongoing
genocide in Gaza, you're not anti war. Not
RFK, not Tulsi Gabbard, and these are principles.
If you wanna go, well, he's better than
Kamala. Get out of the room because you're
not principled. You're pretending and you're buying into
your fake selection or rather your fake choice.
I or anybody else that can see through
it is wanting I don't want you to
present us with 2 false choices. I want
the real country to pick the real leader,
but that's not what we're getting. So to
pretend like the adults in the room are
the ones that lean in to the fact
that you're being played,
my god. That's naive.
Spill a drop of American blood. We will
spill a gallon of yours.
Press Now does that make is that what
we want?
Right. Okay. What happens if we're talking about
somebody like, what happens if an ally does
by accident? Like, or there's so many ways
to pretend that that's just bluster. But at
the end of the day, isn't that exactly
what they claim like the Soviet Union was?
The idea that you just belligerently act with
violence all the time. The old saying that
if if you're a hammer if if what
is it? They have they've hammered everything that
looks like a nail. Right? I mean, if
you only come at this with that mindset,
well, that's what you're gonna get. And guess
what? That's boon that's booting biz that's business
for the merchants of death,
which by the way, this government runs in
the blood of other countries. Much as they
wanna pretend otherwise, that's how you keep it
going as Thomas Massie just pointed out. If
we get if we take money away from
one field of war, it has to go
somewhere else. The whole thing will collapse. So
if you think for one second that these
are gonna stop,
you're blinded to the idea that Trump is
different.
He has nothing to back that up. His
history over 4 years has shown the exact
opposite. And I know the narrative doesn't support
that, but that's not the truth.
Look at what actually happened.
Look at what he's actually done.
Trump, the strength we need
to make America strong
again.
I'm Donald j Trump. And the point
is is that this is not about
everyone screwed and there's no good choice. The
point is that these are not the all
the choices.
I mean, it's just simple as that.
And pointing out that he is not what
he pretends to be is just being honest.
And if you don't like the honesty of
that look. And even if you disagree with
my opinion,
are you are you suggesting that we're I
mean, anyway, I don't wanna get too mired
in the hypothetical. The bottom line is that
I think everybody
understands. I mean, with operation warp speed or
any of these these things, that there's a
very clear problem here.
That they this guy represents
almost all of the problems that we've seen
other than what they say around what actually
happened. There are people out there now saying,
don't stop telling me operation warp speed. Same
kind of thing. Be an adult. Stop you
know, what what's the statement that, you know,
the
perfection is the enemy of good? It's like,
are we really pretending like we shouldn't like
I said before, striving for what's better and
that we're supposed to settle for war criminals
because he's less of a war criminal over
here?
I just I either think, you know, people
that are pushing this are either are
very, very naive or are manipulating you.
Now here is a couple of point again,
points about what's going on in Israel that
I wanna make sure you saw.
Right now they're going, hooray, look at this.
We can prove
Israel's not racist. It's not an apartheid state.
Because look, they just rescued a Muslim guy.
Put your kids as just almost kind of
laughably stupid to try to make that argument
right now. Where's Ben Shapiro being laughably stupid
as usual. He says, remember,
Israel supposedly a racist apartheid state. No. It
is. Verifiably so. Based on the law, based
on static reality, whether or not they rescued
a Muslim guy. But, you know, journalism, Ben,
it says, in which the IDF troops just
went to Gaza terror tunnels to rescue a
Bedouin Muslim.
Again, if let's assume that's even actually what
happened. We'll get there.
Now,
I said,
see, look, a Muslim guy. Now we can
go back to starving, torturing, and raping Palestinians?
I said, you're one
dense Zionist, Ben. You've got to be the
dumbest smart person on Twitter if you thought
this would swing your way. You are very
transparent.
And then it turns out there was something
to be said into this that isn't the
the full picture that they're presenting or if
what they're presenting is not the full picture.
As Muhammad Shehada points out, I just said,
and now we know you're also a liar
or very naive. They found him in by
accident, and this is not the first time.
Israel and Arab captive, it the Israeli Arab
captive, Israel is now desperately taking credit for
saying, look. We're not racist, which Ben dutifully
just bull
regurgitated what they said.
The report turns out that they escaped their
captors on their own, which again, you're gonna
see this filter through as they say this
when they're interviewed,
they were found by chance.
Just like before, guys, this is not new.
We talked about it, except this time, they
shot them instead.
This is the BBC from December 18th,
where 3 hostages were out and they got
away.
They were out there. They're speaking Hebrew. They're
saying, I'm Israeli. I'm a hostage.
And and most of them, you could argue,
don't look very clearly like they're not a
Palestinian.
And
immediately shot 2 of them. 1 of them
ran away. All this is documented in this
article.
15 minutes went by.
He's over there going, I'm not I'm I'm
a he I'm Israeli. Don't shoot me.
This is this this is not up for
debate.
He then gets coaxed out. They say, come
on out. Come on out. He walks out,
and 2 of these IDEA members shoot him.
Again, I say this every time. There is
simply no misunderstanding that.
Whatever, I can't speak to why.
They knew he was Israeli, they shot him.
And remember, they came out with a they
had a a a towel or a blanket
with written SOS.
I mean, guys, this is deliberate. They were
murdering. It's Hannibal's directive, I think. My opinion.
Either way, it shows you there's a very
clear directive that they don't want people coming
home and telling you that, no, that what
they keep telling you is not true. We
were more afraid of your bombings like even
Noah Arghamani has been making clear. No? I
I'm I'm struggling because of what you did
and the bombs you sent. They just recently
got caught lying about her.
So the point
is that this guy got found,
and the Israeli government does what it does.
They go, perfect. Let's lie about this. Let's
make let's use this to make it seem
like we're not what we know we are.
Which means they clearly recognize that they know
what they're doing.
And the Israeli military jumps up and goes,
hey. We rescued hostage.
After and they they literally said, in a
a complex
operation.
Like, so this is my point as always.
They can't just come out and say we
rescued the guy.
Make it simple. Knowing it's a lie, but
we rescued him. You could that that alone
would be interpreted as you did something. Right?
And and then at the very at the
very least, you could walk away going, oh,
we didn't say we'd we just we we
we found him if he got pushed, but
we rescued him. See my point? Is you
could've been very art tactful about it,
ins insinuated that you did do something, but
we rescued him, let the media run with
it like they would've, but no. What Israel
does.
We're not we're not and we're not only
not starving them, we're they're
drowning them in food. You see my point?
Instead of just going, no, we're giving them
more than they we're giving them enough.
They come out and say, no. It's a
complex operation. Took us 45 months to plan
it. You know, whatever nonsense they spit out.
And then they look really stupid when it
very quickly comes out that it wasn't at
all. You see my point? Like, this is
they're just bad at this. Every time it's
reactive. And every time it's way over the
top. I just don't know why. But it's
it's almost it's almost hilarious.
I know they found the guy, and now
they want you to think they're not racist
for finding the guy. Here's even Benjamin Netanyahu
coming out and going and this prime minister
of Israel's Twitter account. I commend the IDF
and the ISA for another successful rescue operation.
We're working relentlessly to return. No. You're not.
Even your own people are hounding you because
you're not doing that. They're all accusing you
of deliberately
circumventing the deal and keeping them there, killing
them. Guys, this is not up for debate.
There it's on it's on the Israeli media.
But here he is aiming this right at
you for very clear reasons.
They are desperate.
And here's even a US congressman. Here's what
it says.
It says, for 10 grueling months,
Israel has risked the lives of its soldiers
to rescue all the hostages held captive by
Hamas. That's what this guy is saying.
I mean, you could almost feel the Zionist
strings on this guy. I mean, think about
how crazy that is.
10 months of an ongoing genocide that the
world is calling out. This guy stands up
and goes, congratulations on their grueling, risking their
lives effort to save the guy that they
just found accidentally.
It says their bravery
secured the rescue of this guy. No. It
didn't.
And it says after here, a rare moment
of joy
made possible by Israel's indiscriminate
zeal for justice.
And a stark reminder that more works
work remains. Bring them home now. Yeah. That
has turned into a chant at the Israeli
government.
Bring them home now is saying stop effing
around and take any deal they offer. You
think I'm lying? Look it up. Look at
what the Israeli people are saying, by and
large.
Here's an American congressman
being funded by APAC, that's the reality,
telling you the opposite of even what Israelis
are saying. Because the whole propaganda game is
aimed at you, America. That's what it is.
This disgusting human being, or so blindly naive
he doesn't even know that he's lying,
is actually pretending that they rescued the guy
they had found, and that all of this
is because of their
indiscriminate zeal for justice.
As they're literally being accused by every international
entity as being a genocidal maniac who's raping
and torturing people.
I mean, how do we make sense of
this
other than to recognize how lost this government
is in this dynamic?
And on that point,
as La la points out, I 24 being
the channel that brought Euphoria Beheaded Babies. Remember
that? They put this out.
Sinwar reportedly hiding in plain sight, dressed as
a woman.
More of those every accusation is an admission.
Like, we just saw them dress up as
Palestinian women, and they and and more more
than once, mind you. And then break into
hospitals and murder people on their beds. That's
a crime no matter who you think they're
going after. Nobody cared.
The point is,
I guarantee you this is about trying to
rational make it look like when they murder
women, no. They're just probably Hamas members or
that's why we thought.
It's just disgusting what they're doing. And Rami
says the same thing. Is this an attempt
to justify the thousands of women Israel are
killing in Gaza?
And this point as well.
This is what we're talking about. This is
one of the most transparently,
dishonest. I mean, it's, Arnab Batran Batran made
a great thread about this.
Here's what the American Jewish Committee says. This
morning in southern France,
the Yaakov synagogue was the target of a
vile terrorist attack. Surveillance footage shows a man
wrapped in a Palestinian flag
walking away from the scene holding 2 gas
canisters.
Look at this guy.
I mean, come on, guys. I mean, I
mean, are we really this stupid?
So this guy has a very weirdly wrapped
keep well, it's a version of a keep
on his head, or rather I don't know.
Maybe it's a different name if it's red
and white. And a Palestinian flag tied around
his waist
to go in and attack the synagogue. I
mean, come on. I mean, of course, anything's
possible. But with all of the many, many,
many, many, many, many, many different lies we've
seen and they've been caught in, whether being
faking, stabbed in the eye, or lied about
stranting the Jews, we we kill all the
Jews, whatever.
Over and over, they keep getting caught and
saying that didn't happen or no, here's the
person didn't. He's an Israeli over and over.
I'm not saying racism does exist or doesn't
exist. I'm not saying there aren't that there's
no examples of people on the Palestinian
protesting side that have done acts of violence.
What I'm saying is it's overwhelmingly
clear how many of these have been deliberately
faked by the entity that has
built an identity around
psychological operations.
Absolute lie. I mean, what's the Mossad motto
legitimately?
Is through deception,
thou shalt conduct war or something like that?
That's what they are.
And now we have this example.
Here's what,
oh, you of course. And now you can't
see the image.
So funny.
See if it loads this time? There it
is. Of course.
And this is a Middle East article which
you should read and there's a lot of
background around this. The Israeli undercover agents with
a history of dressing like Palestinians.
It's a very very common tactic and I
quite frankly think that's responsible for a lot
of what we're talking about.
It's just crazy how often this is happening
right now. Now here's a clip from Ben
Swan that I wanna play.
It's a great we've talked a lot and
played the clip for you a lot about
the is former head of Shabbat, former prime
minister Barak openly telling you that they have
funded Hamas right up until October 7th. We
have the Mossad chief who went to Qatar
on in 2020
to petition Qatar to keep funding Hamas. And
we've shown you that they said it's because
their stated policy and their Lacud meeting and
their Lacud policy, Lacud being his Netanyahu's party,
That their policy
is to fund Hamas to keep them divided
and keep Palestinians divided so they don't have
to give them a 2 state solution.
It's literally on the record. Herets, as I've
shown you a 1000 times, wrote an article
about it. And yet here we are in
the United States where our government tells us
we're racist for pointing out that supposed lie.
Here's Ben doing an excellent 5 minute breakdown
of how this is clear.
Not only do they help create them, and
you could make the point about that they
created them. Now I'm not saying from whole
cloth, but there's an entity that they literally
turned into what this was
and then kept them in this position to
keep them from
to hurt the Palestinian people. And realize the
whole time in the media,
in the western sphere, they Israel Netanyahu was
pretending
to be fighting for a Tuesday solution.
Just straight up lying to you, and that
is an important thing around all of this.
More than 300 days ago, when Hamas carried
out their October 7th attack on Israel, Israeli
prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu likened the attack to
Pearl Harbor and even the holocaust.
Enemies of civilization,
bloodthirsty terrorists, savages,
genocidal barbarians, and Nazis, these are all words
that Netanyahu and other Israeli officials have used
to describe Hamas. So it might come as
a little bit of a surprise that Israel,
while designating Hamas a terrorist organization,
has been consistently supporting these genocidal barbarians
with suitcases filled with 100 of 1,000,000 of
dollars in cash.
I'm investigator journalist Ben Swan, and this is
reckoning Israel and Gaza.
Although Israeli support for Hamas was happening as
recently as last year, it began in the
19 eighties. See, in the 19 eighties, Israel
directly supported Hamas because they wanted it to
become more powerful as a governing authority than
the secular non religious PLO or Palestinian
Liberation
Organization. Now really quickly, that's an important point
that I've made a lot.
Right there, you have an example of a
less of a more moderate entity.
No matter what you think about the narratives
around it all, it's very easy to see.
Even if you think they're all crazy, the
point is they were far less extreme on
sir on paper. And the idea is, well,
extreme on sir on paper. And the idea
is, well, we don't wanna work with rather,
even more so that the group what doesn't
want to work with us because we're an
occupier, because we're a belligerent entity, because we're
rapists and
murderer. Whatever it is.
So the point is they are able to
be manipulated, and this is basically US foreign
policy.
So they seek out the radical
and go, hey. We'll give you money and
arms if you just start causing chaos for
that group we don't like. And then it
could even potentially just take power, and then
we get to work through you. And you
could do whatever rape and murder. I don't
care. As long as we get the resources
and we get control. If you think that's
not the reality, you're lying to yourself.
It may be a little bit more peppered
with some kind of lie about good things,
but it's the obvious truth. So in this
case, or any other dynamic of the Middle
East, Israel overlap, the US government and Israel
have funded the most radical elements of what
they claim they're fighting as far back as
you look
for this kind of purpose or simply to
conduct
destabilization
tactics against their enemies to be able to
either occupy them with another leader they want
or regime change or whatever.
That's the reality. And so right here, you
can see that happening.
Now from there forward, if you wanna pretend
that it's anybody else's fault other than the
people making that the reality, then you're lying
to yourself.
Palestinians
are left with I mean, look at it
like this. Even if you wanna pretend that
they voted in Hamas 2006, which I argue
I still don't think is even the idea
that they would've ever let them pick is
sort of naive, but I guess it's certainly
possible.
My point is, it's like at their own
2 party illusion.
You're presenting them with choices where they're desperate.
They don't have any they don't get to
really decide. It's ultimately something Israel manufactured. We
saw that. They gave them the money to
make this happen.
Then
turn that into their respond you'd basically make
it about the fact that they're terrorists because
of what they created.
And on top of that, realizing that if
you're in a Palestinian position, you've been occupied,
suppressed, raped, tortured, murdered for how for decades.
You might just lean into a group that's
willing to take out violence on the occupier.
But in any sense, the point is right
here, you can see that they manufactured
this current reality.
So when they scream and go look at
what Hamas is, and we can't allow people
that would support that to work, well, then
that's you. You support that. You are the
one using that group to stop what Palestinians
could be.
That is the real point, the real focal
point. It's a name you haven't heard in
a while. See, Israel knew that turning see,
in the 19 eighties, Israel directly supported Hamas
because they wanted it to become
more powerful as a governing authority than the
secular non religious PLO or Palestinian
Liberation Organization.
That's a name you haven't heard in a
while. See, Israel knew that turning the national
struggle into a religious struggle or jihad would
allow Israel to frame Palestinian Liberation as the
aim of only Islamic fanatics.
Former Israeli general Yitzhak Pandak told the New
York Times, quote, the Israeli government gave me
a budget, and the military government gave me
a budget, and I financed the opening of
as many mosques and schools as possible.
Just think about that for a second.
So everything we're talking about, whether these groups
that are being started, the, you know, Patriot
Front and all these different things, that's part
of this larger game.
I'm convinced or the Azov movement. I mean,
this is what they've done. They've been spreading
and funding and growing these radical entities to
be used and thrown at people they want.
I mean, the settler movement in Israel was
basically the same thing. Look at what they're
doing and what they've become. And they're even
using that as a threat from the Gavir
sort of what's his name? Lior, Dior,
Lior, like, the the the rabbi of of
the most extremist elements in their group. Even
Netanyahu called them sort of, like, the leadership
of this group. They they have this massive
settler belligerent movement. They're they'll attack Israelis.
That's what we're seeing. They have done this
everywhere. And they're telling you right there, we
have manufactured this. And then we point to
these things and say, look at how crazy
they are. And you've got right wing entities
in this country that are going, that's the
problem. Look at how it's overtaking the world.
Guess what? You're pointing to what Israel's doing.
And your government's funding
that. We wanted to strengthen Islamic institutions.
Well, for decades, this social support system cultivated
the political and religious ideologies
that now drive Hamas militants, adults who once
attended the very mosques and schools
directly funded
by Israel. It wasn't merely about supporting Islamism
and passively wishing it would yield religious leadership.
Israel actively engineered Hamas' takeover of Gaza. According
to a leaked diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks,
Israeli Defense Intelligence chief, Amos Yadlin,
explicitly said in 2007 that, quote, Israel would
be happy if Hamas took over Gaza because
the IDF could then deal with Gaza as
a hostile state, end quote. So in 2012,
with the explicit permission of Israel, the government
of Qatar began delivering suitcases filled with 1,000,000
of dollars in cash every month. Now this
is the important part.
Delivering cash in suitcases,
not going into some bank account. Right? Not
being used to buy humanitarian aid because in
this location, you you can't. It's shipped in
for the very reason that they don't have
because Israel's manufactured that.
Like and, really, it's the kinda same dynamic
we see of US government foreign policy
of occupying a nation and forcing them to
outsource everything and only produce what they need
for the US government's needs in the immediate
moment. So then they're in a position where,
should they need to, that rugs pulled and
they can't can they can't manage themselves anymore.
That's because they were driven there. Same idea
here.
Right? We're in a situation where they have
allowed that to be the reality. Right? So,
ultimately, they they the the aid or the
restrictions of water and food and resources
has driven them into desperate desperate position to
where they can bring in what they need
and let make it look like they're unable
to manage themselves.
Right? So they gave them money, and what
are they gonna get? Weapons.
It's what it is.
That's the it's the reality of what with
what this dynamic was. And so the point
is it shows you that this was the
creation of what they were growing. For the
ruling party in Gaza,
Hamas. According to Israeli newspaper, Heretz,
Qatar delivered 1,100,000,000
in US cash and Qatari riles from 2012
to 2019.
While working in Gaza, Reuters photographer Ibrahim Abu
Mustafa
took photos of Hamas government employees after they
received their monthly salary
in US dollars.
Israeli journalist Barak Ravid noted that, quote, Israel's
coordination with Qatar over the transfer of money
to Gaza is one of the most bizarre
elements of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. It's a
paradox where Israel allows funds to Hamas while
considering them a terrorist organization, end quote. So
so why?
Israel facilitated the transfer of more than a
$1,000,000,000
to Hamas for political reasons.
By bolstering Hamas and ensuring they remain the
dominant political force in Gaza,
Israel effectively minimized the chances of the more
secular Palestinian authority, which already controls the West
Bank from coming to power in Gaza.
Now I would add to that I think
that a lot has changed.
Right? So from 2006 forward
and and this is the confusing part about
where I don't even know for sure where
I feel like that group is or whether
it's kind of a fractured entity. That clearly,
I think there's a part of this where
people have gone grown up and and joined
this group and and the the phone the
very,
root of it, you know, it's changed. The
dynamic of the group has changed. I still
think very clearly that there are people that
are influenced by Israel within this group. But
I also think it's clear that there it
has
shifted into something that is part resistance entity
against what Israel is doing.
You know? So I mean, it's it's I
I for each viewer to decide based on
the facts. But it's important to see the
nuance there. But overall,
US money going to fund what they were
calling terrorism. Like, while they were saying that,
right up until before October 7th, guys, that's
mind blowing.
That's not part of the conversation. What it
really shows you is that people at the
core of this conversation, the western media, they
they all know this. They're ignoring it. What
does that show you? See, the strategy hinders
the formation of a unified
Palestinian state. And Netanyahu,
well, he actually said this during political party
meetings in 2019.
According to Heretz, Netanyahu told other members of
his party that, quote, anyone who is against
the Palestinian state should be for sending money
to Gaza
because keeping Hamas in Gaza and the Palestinian
authority in the West Bank helps to prevent
the establishment
of a Palestinian
state. In an interview with German media, former
Israeli prime minister Ehud Omer said, quote, Netanyahu
supported and advanced Hamas in Gaza. Netanyahu wanted
to keep Hamas alive because he thought that
if Hamas would remain in power in Gaza,
it would divide the Palestinians between the West
Bank and Gaza, And so it would prevent
the establishment
of a Palestinian state. Predict Every time all
these US politicians stand up and and scream
about how you're the one stop, they don't
want that or they're too dumb to know
they're being played. Simple as that. This strategy
of channeling 1,000,000,000 of dollars to their so
called greatest enemy
backfired on Israel when Hamas launched its cross
border attack on October 7th. And Now there's
another point to add there though that just
to consider. Now I honestly don't lean this
way. And if this feel like there's too
much to to kind of water this down.
But at the end of the day, it's
also possible,
at least possible, not likely in my opinion,
but possible that this was part of a
manufactured effort as well.
All the weird foreknowledge and stuff. But I've
spoken to a lot of people that I
highly respect that seem to feel that that's
just not the case. Now I have my
own opinion. I still think that there's some
openings there that are are that I won't
close until I feel that there's more definitive
information. Like, that the pot it's certainly possible
that some element of their government wanted this
to happen or part of it didn't know
it'd be what it was. I don't know.
But that's at least something to consider. Right?
If we know and we can see a
money trail to a group that later did
this and how they did it doesn't seem
to add up, we obviously should leave that
open for possibility. That's just being objective. For
Americans, not only are we not told this
incredibly crucial, maybe the most crucial part of
this entire story between Israel and Hamas,
but we're also left footing the bill using
billions of US taxpayer dollars to defend Israel
from a monster that Israel itself
helped to create.
As the former Israeli religious affairs head, Avner
Cohen said, quote, Hamas,
to my great regret,
is Israel's creation,
end quote. If you haven't already, you can
follow us on x@truth_inmedia,
or you can follow this series by signing
up to see each episode as it comes
out at truth in media.com.
And at truth in media, you'll find the
transcript of the story along with all the
source articles. Check them out for yourself, and
stay tuned as we continue to unveil the
truth around Israel's war on Gaza.
It's important. I think that I think Ben
did a great job.
I mean, I he never for the most
part, every point, he even added points there
that I don't think we've talked about. Right?
The idea is clearly that there's no question
that this was funding the group that they
claim was terrorists, but they did and they
funded them for the explicit purpose of stopping
what publicly they were saying that they were
wanting, and it was only because of the
Palestinians that they couldn't get it to happen.
How what more do we really need to
see to understand how bad this all is?
This is why people who are invested in
this just don't want you to see it.
And that goes to people in the paradigm
in the in this country, goes to international
entities, to our government in general, what they're
doing around the world. Israel, obviously, and what
they're doing to the Palestinians as we speak.
Now, here is a great clip I'm gonna
play before we get into the 2 party
illusion aspect of this. And there's a reason
I wanted you to see all this. Because
the people we're gonna talk about next,
you have to realize that they're o they're
not only okay with all this, they're supporting
all this. And if you think for one
second that they can't see what we're talking
about, you're lying to yourself.
So here on BBC,
Miriam Barghouti
is speaking with BBC
from Ramallah
and just lays it out. And very clearly
import she it's very the way she says
it is important, and the way that they
respond on BBC, I think, is also important.
And it really just shows you, not just
in Gaza, but the West Bank, or really
just 2 Palestinians
That this is a deliberate extermination campaign
out of hate,
wanting the people to suffer.
We have heard some Israeli politicians being vocal
in their opposition to what's going on. How
unusual is it to to hear that sort
of criticism?
So you have these Israeli
policy makers essentially enforcing a genocide
just
couple of dozen kilometers,
west of the West Bank. And at the
same time saying, oh, this is abhorrent or
we condemn this act. And again, you need
to remember that these settlers are part of
the Israeli system,
that the Israeli government has placed them illegally
in the West Bank as part of the
annexation.
Now
the the condemnation
from Israeli policy makers
comes from the strategy within the Israeli military
and that is called perception
shaping. This is really important. It's what we
keep talking about. The idea that they will
just come out and be like, that shouldn't
have happened and we're gonna investigate that guy.
Or occasionally give you one token to be
like, oh, we're gonna put him in jail
and then they quietly let him out like
3 days later and go tell you that.
Constantly happens.
So the point is that when she's highlighting,
look at what they said online, it it
people say a lot of things. Look at
what they continue to do. Look at how
they follow through with that action. Look at
how they gaslight you around the obvious. That's
what matters. So she's highlighting that they come
out and pretend they care. And BBC, that's
what they wanna hear. Well, they said that
they're sorry. Well, is that really what you
care about? The reality is they continue to
murder children and then they occasionally go, that
one was wrong.
That's all you get. That's see kind of
a similar dynamic we're seeing with the 2
party aspect. And it is a policy that
they enforce in order to maintain
a semi,
image of being,
a moral army or being a regime that
values human life and values,
legal regulation. I just must go back to
a word that you used a moment ago.
It is a fact that many international members
of the international community regard these settlements as
illegal,
But you just use the word genocide. Is
that in relation to what's happening in in
the West Bank? Are you really using that
word?
So I'm speaking about the genocide that is
happening in Beze. Now what is happening in
Palestine, and you need to remember Beze is
not a separate entity
from Palestine, which seems to be the trend
in media.
Israel is enforcing spatio side and that includes
the annexation of territory
and the depopulation of villages. In the West
Bank, we have witnessed
an unprecedented
rate of Israeli settler annexation of Palestinian lands
and actual depopulation
of of towns and areas within the West
Bank. So that does fall within the overall
Israeli strategy
of ethnic cleansing,
and if that word makes you uncomfortable, I
recommend that you go and actually see what
ethnic cleansing means because Israel has de facto,
implemented
every part
of what that phrase entails. Well, of course.
So yes, I do place it in that
same category. Well, of course, Israel would deny
that
completely
and even members of the international community would
would challenge some of what you've just said.
What is the mood? What is the anticipation
though in the West Bank and what might
happen next and how
is the temperature lowered?
Just briefly if you would. Of course Israel
would refute that in parts of the international
community. Like I said, this is part of
Israel's perception shaping strategy. Can we move on
to the question the question So the question
So
my question is, what's the anticipation in the
West Bank of what might happen next and
what needs to happen to bring this the
temperature down? Right.
So the anticipation in the West Bank is
part of how you just responded to it.
So Palestinians are expecting,
especially international media correspondents
to devalue what is happening here and semi
legitimize it. I didn't do that. I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. Mariam To be clear, what's funny
about it is she didn't say that she
was doing that. I'm just not with the
insinuation, but she just broadly said that they
that people in Palestine expect the media to
do that.
It's funny. And I see this a lot
lately, how people
they sense you know, even if you did
see she I'm not doing that. It's like,
well, she didn't really say you're doing that.
But the fact that you responded that way
makes it kinda seem like you know you're
doing that.
Think it's part of how you just responded
to me. So Palestinians are expecting,
especially international media correspondents
to devalue what is happening here and semi
legitimize it. I didn't do that at all.
I'm sorry. Mariamog, I didn't I did not
do that at all. I did not do
that at all. I'm asking you.
I'm asking you to tell me what the
anticipation
is. I'm asking you to tell me what
the mood is and the anticipation is of
Palestinians in the West Bank. That isn't devaluing
anything that has has happened at all. And
we have just reported that the British foreign
secretary
has
has condemned
the settler violence.
Please answer my question. As I said, perception
shaping. You can go back to this interview
and see how you devalued it. As in
for what is the situation in the West
Bank,
Palestinians are frightened.
They are terribly frightened. You have a population
that has gone rogue. This is a de
facto rogue regime
that has psychopathic
tendencies.
And at the same time, there is a
disregard to the fact that Palestinians are facing
this completely unprotected.
While on the one hand, you're having settlers
being armed with assault rifles, M16s,
Israeli military is using drone warfare of the
Hermes 450
specifically
from Elbit Systems within the UK
against Palestinians.
We have had nearly 700 Palestinians killed in
the last 10 months. So in terms of
anticip In the West Bank. It
it hinges
on what the international community
will allow to persist. My apologies. Notwithstanding
Israeli comments,
not withstanding
your coverage of who condemned what, but in
practice, in actual
my practice. Marianne Baghussi, thank you very much
for talking to us here on BBC News.
Mhmm.
I love it. I think she just absolutely
nailed her. She did a great job. I
like her, by the way.
That's I think it's important to see. Not
only how they're you know, they don't I'm
I don't even think people like her right
there really understand
fully what they're doing.
Like, they're just talking heads.
Now somebody in the chat said, I I
would say whoever funds some us is irrelevant.
I just wanna make sure we understand that
what we're I'm saying at the very least
is I'm not trying to say that that
I mean, there's part of it for sure,
about influence and action. I did make a
point about that. But I'm not saying that
that is the only point we're making. That
therefore, the person that funds them is responsible
for what happened. That's not what I'm even
getting at, really. There's a plight point there.
All I'm the I mean, rest of the
main point that I'm making there is that
if if Israel's gonna make take the stance
that they're fighting terrorism and that the people
who represent that are the ones that support
this group, that includes them
financially, which allowed them to be and grow
into the thing. And I think part of
that's what they grew them into as well.
That they then point at. So if that's
how is that's not the most relevant part
of the conversation? I don't know. Because what
you're showing is that Israel is lying about,
1, what they're creating to justify their action,
which is murder against innocent people, as well
as the fact that they're not this innocent
entity fighting against bad guy terrorism when they're
the ones that made sure it was the
case. I mean, that's the definition of of
of relevant, in my opinion, but we can
all have our opinions. Now here
is the point we're gonna get into next.
The idea of the 2 party illusion and
the concern we have that I started with.
And so realizing
how relevant it is, not only because of
your tax dollars all around the world for
that matter, but speaking to Americans going to
fund this, that your
I mean, every aspect of this is being
allowed
in in,
not insulated, but,
bolstered
and grown with US support. If US government
was not supporting this, it would be it
wouldn't be happening.
I mean, literally, they would not have the
means to continue.
So if we can't consider this as
a a a a a, relevant and important
talking point around the election, I mean, I
I don't even know how it's possible.
A genocide being conducted with your tax dollars
and them leading this and deriving I mean,
my god. That's, it's be that is this
is an American genocide
on top of Israel. There's no way around
that. Rather specifically, to be clear from my
opinion, and a US government genocide.
No question.
So when we can see that almost everybody
involved that we're supposedly choosing between are all
going, yep. That's gonna continue. Yeah. I support
that.
We have to recognize how un disconcerting that
is
For what they what they're presenting as what
we are when we're not them.
As well as the fact that there's really
no choice away from this with this control
dynamic, which should show you that it's not
honest.
But Trump
just tapped RFK Junior and Tulsi Gabbard for
his presidential transition
team.
Very interesting. Now I haven't addressed the other
part of the title today, which honestly I've
kind of put it out there to kind
of
I find it to be an very interesting
talking point. Now I'll actually wait. I'm gonna
get to it more in a second. But
the the idea that look. The democrats have
taken over the republican party. You know? You
guys all know my opinion about the illusion
within that. But what's fascinating to me is
this narrative that, you know, the democrats are
inherent evil and they're the bad guy. But
when it really I mean, they're all just
as ridiculous.
But then all of a sudden, you recognize
that they're now trying to promote. But guess
what? Everyone currently in the leadership, they all
used to be democrats.
Which shows you everyone's coming to the republican
party. But what's funny about that is, like,
okay. Well, wait a minute. Can't you wouldn't
you stand back and go, hold on.
Shouldn't I be at least suspicious that maybe
this is some kind of an internal democrat
coup of the republican party? Like, I don't
remember anything I think that. I think it's
funny that the willingness to ignore the kind
of in the the concern, it's it's just
a blind support.
That's what I'm trying to show you there.
And the reality that at the end of
the day,
none of these narratives really line up at
all. It's a bitch. It's it's ID log
support for what you pretend it's the team
sport politics.
And there's no consistency amongst these people at
all anymore.
Look at what they're actually pretending they stand
for of Gabbard and RFK. RFK and Gabbard
are much more in line, but the idea
is clearly that they are not the idea
is that, I guess, because they're there now,
that's gonna change Trump's policy. That's ridiculous.
If you think for one second that this
is now like like, I saw a tweet
that made me laugh.
No. This is great. Now we
add RFK, and now we got Trump's account.
Now we're pro health, and we're pro this,
and we're pro what do you mean you're
now that? It's like these are trading cards.
You just don't get the attributes of RFK
because he joined some kind of a team.
I mean, we are not can't be this
childish.
The reality is that they are simply people
and mostly are telling you a lot of
what you wanna hear. I'd like to believe
that some of them might be different, but
they've shown you that's not true.
To pretend that these are, like, attributes that
you're collecting, like, are there some notches on
your belt.
What they truly do in the administration
is what matters.
Rest of it's narrative. We already saw with
Trump's administration before or literally everyone before that
in history, or or I shouldn't say that,
but ultimately that we can see from what
we're dealing with here that they did not
follow through with what they said they were
gonna do.
So we're just holding on to what they
tell you from politicians that have been caught
lying over and over.
So we talked a lot about the idea
of RFK and the joining. I mean, quite
frankly, I think it's obvious. I think I
talked about it with Derek's interview.
It's it's it's a
your it's principle we're talking about.
Now I get
it. The what he put out in regard
to joining Trump's team, there's a logical statement
there. It made sense.
But I just don't understand how we can
pretend
that you're doing this to change the system,
1, to fight against the injection and medical
freedom and that kind of force dynamic when
Trump literally drove Operation Warp Speed and still
to this day defends the injection as a
positive thing,
that you're somehow gonna
fall into that.
And and and the guy, big business, authoritarian,
openly supporting Israel genocide. Like, how in this
any way I mean, Trump supports big business.
You think that's gonna end up supporting the
against big pharma?
I mean, it's amazing that we can't reconcile
these things. And at the end of the
day, people just don't want to. So my
point is if you're r k RFK,
you sacrificed your principles
to pretend or, I guess, to maybe hope
that may you could maybe influence in a
positive direction. Like, if you think that that's
the only way to make change, then maybe
you agree with that. But my point is
that is more of the same. If you
wanted something different, then he should've stuck this
out, tried to gain 5%, try to start
a new party, gain that extra money, and
then roll it into next year. Like, literally
try to change this. By the way, that's
what people who supported him were actually supporting.
Difference. Change.
Not the same thing. Not falling into the
same two parties that they were leaning into
him because of them.
Now I've seen a lot of people that
are shifting around because I I guess they
think this is some kind of monumental thing,
and I hope it is. I hope I'm
wrong.
The sad reality is him falling into that
turned it into the same old thing. And
I frankly, my gut tells me that that
was always gonna happen.
With our with now with Gabbard joining, I
mean, it just seems like as I said
before, I think it's right here.
If RFK, Elon, and Ed Elon, which by
the way is a part of this, ends
up in Trump's administration, I'll be convinced that
this was always the plan.
Either way, I feel like we're pretty screwed
with all this because
with
with what it will create. When the 3
and now the 4,
maybe you might just call her the most
worshiped but definitely high up there, people that
follow her,
the most worshiped political figures today merge their
sycophant followers into one obsessive hero worshiping blob.
I it's just terrifying. Like, the amount of
influence and control over the conversation with this
many I mean, again, and I you can
shoot prove
Gabbard supporters?
How in the world are they pretending they
align with Trump supporters?
I mean, like, at it from not like
the
ridiculous aspect of any supporting group, but I
mean, like, the people that stand by the
issues even. It does not make sense. Now
I would be the first to say that
that's if we're actually doing this, that's good.
We should have some kind of overlap in
conversation. But that's not what's gonna happen. They're
not they're not saying let's compromise. And what
you think the Republican leadership is gonna compromise
on what they believe, look at what they're
saying.
It's not the reality.
Now here's Eva Bartlett making a very obvious
point. And it well, first, here's RFK Junior.
This is how this is being presented like
we're like we're children.
Wonder Woman just joined the justice league.
Quite quite frankly, I find that to be
pretty
patronizing.
Maybe he's trying to make a funny point.
I don't know. But I I think this
feels ridiculous to me.
Especially when you see things like this.
Trump unit or team unity. That's what it
says.
It's got Vivek back there, Elon, RFK. No.
This is just a meme somebody made.
And then here's Viva Fray. Yes, sir.
Really?
I mean, I'm I'm embarrassed for people that
are falling into this is embarrassing.
This hero worship is is it's embarrassing. It
makes me feel uncomfortable for them. That anybody
is going, yeah.
Like, I'm like, oh my god. I mean,
this is not this is not some kind
of a high school election.
This is crazy to me that we're leaning
into this based on some kind of, like,
trading card lineup. It's weird to me.
Wonder Woman joined the Justice League, and Eva
Bartlett says the US is effing circus.
Justice League equals slavishly pro Zionist.
Because that's what we're talking about here.
Every single one of them
are willing to support what's going on in
Israel.
And the comedian says, yeah. They make everything
into a Hollywood movie, and people just gobble
it up. Both sides are bought by the
same lobby.
Exactly.
Now here, in case you were, for a
moment, going, but Tulsi Gabbard doesn't think that,
well, here's what she had to say.
Answer.
I think Israel's approach
has to be in in recognizing that delineation
as far as possible. And I know it's
tough when you have
a terrorist group like Hamas
that is so interwoven
within the community of people in Okay. So
here's where you would go, and Israel made
that funded that into reality,
but that's not part of the conversation. Doesn't
that seem like a why like, not just
relevant, but paramount?
That that's majorly consequential to the entire point,
but that never gets brought into it. In
Gaza
But to recognize
that there there should be and there is
a shared purpose there for the Palestinian people
to
be able to live free and in peace
and not under the oppression of this terrorist
group.
Right. So you're talking about Israel because that's
the oppression they're under. This game they play
where somehow Hamas has the Palestinian people under
their thumb,
it's just simply not true. Now you can
argue they're a terrorist group if you want,
but that's just simply not the reality that
they are somehow oppressing the Palestinian people. It's
not true.
It's just simple I mean, and this is
one of these things we're talking about. It's
an objective reality, and even if you wanna
pretend that,
Israel, more than anything I've ever seen in
my lifetime, is oppressing everything around it.
Most importantly, the Palestinian people. Based on everything.
International law, United I mean, but and she
doesn't know that, you think?
This whole facade, which I'm convinced it is
now based on these, I mean, many different
stances now that don't jive with the presentation
she puts forward, is just that it is
not real to me. How you can put
forward this very sane, measured, anti war perspective
and then make this argument?
I don't care if this is my this
hey. This is a good point to make.
There are some people right now thinking, oh,
she's just saying that because of politics.
You know that. The same thing. Oh, Trump
just said that because he wants to get
elected. Oh, our case supporting Israel just so
he gets in power.
I'm done with this.
These are these are people that do not
have principles if what you're gonna tell me
is, yeah. I'll let Israel murder some children.
And then once I get elected, I'll change
it. Or Trump saying, well, I'll just support
the injection until I get into power, then
so you're willing to accept genocide, murder, and
and whatever else you wanna call these things
just so then once we get power, we'll
we'll turn it back.
So they're just as bad as anybody else.
The idea that you can make this statement
make sense with what she pretends, she supports,
is beyond me.
Be able to live free and in peace
and not under the oppression of this terrorist
group
just as the people of Israel would like
to live in peace and free
from the threat of attack from a terrorist
group that wants to exterminate
Yeah. You mean the group that Israel funded
into reality, but we we won't get into
that part of it. Right? It's all the
Palestinians' fault all the time about the group
that Israel funded in the power to stop
the Palestinians.
I mean, guys, this cannot be a side
point. This has to be a a talking
point in this conversation. Why don't they bring
it up? Because they're not honest.
I mean or or god forbid, they're that
shockingly uninformed, and they're acting belligerently with military
force without knowing what's going on.
Either way, guys, we need to be honest
about this.
Principle matters.
Vanessa says, and Dolce Gabbard joins Zion's dream
team.
Now, same tweet from RFK Jr. And here's
James saying, let's go. We have a country
to save.
And there's this they they remember that weird
AI dancing thing that went out with Trump
and Elon? Well, now they've made it something
bigger. Now you got Vance and and,
Tulsi and I mean, it's this is it's
this is a clown show.
Remember, it's not one side or the other.
This is just embarrassing. This game acting like
this is all some kind of a fantasy
team pick.
Same thing. Team Unity assembled.
My god. You can't see this as hero
worship?
This is cult level.
Now on top of that, just as of
today, Trump indicted in the 2nd time in
election subver, subversion case.
Now look, I I I was said then,
and I'll say it now, this is clear
political persecution. But my point,
what ultimately happens with any of this?
I've never seen any of these people actually
get held accountable. Shouldn't that at least give
you pause to make you wonder whether or
not none of it's real?
I mean, or at the very least, that
this is all just flimsy because they can
work their way out of it since they're
powerful. However you look at it, once this
all passes, mark my words,
and whatever actually happens,
like, on what you're shown, however dirty it
gets and whatever moves you made and lawyer
speaking, things are said in front of congress.
If at the end of the day, nobody
gets held accountable or even if you think
this is completely baseless, if nothing happens at
all on either side and it all goes
forward, and the only thing that changed was
all the supporters go see, he's they're trying
to stop him because he's the one. He's
the good guy.
Couldn't you at least ask whether that wasn't
actually what happened?
I'm convinced that everything right now is driving
to support Trump. I know that's not even
popular within this community. I know a lot
of people don't think that that makes sense.
I'm just giving you my opinion. And I've
been clear about that being my opinion. But
at the end of the day, everything that
keeps trickling forward seems to be lined up
to go
I mean, even democrats as we all keep
talking about. We all know that they don't
think Kamala is what they pretend she is
right now. It's embarrassing.
They said she wasn't that 30 seconds ago.
So the point is it's almost like they're
trying to guilt, like, if they if they
come out with this fake narrative how Kamala
is gonna save the world and she's the
best, most worshiped hero, you're gonna have Democrats
that go, well, that's ridiculous.
We were all laughing about how dumb she
is. 30 seconds, now I'm supposed to pretend
that's not the case. Anybody honest is gonna
go, well, maybe Trump is the real guy.
Maybe they are the liars.
I feel like that's what's happening. Just at
least keep that open in your mind. Because
my point is, again, is that we the
election is a farce where our lecture our
supposed vote doesn't translate to the outcome, and
it should. And a real representative government, that's
paramount. I don't think I think that's been
stolen from us. As at some point, one
or everywhere,
whether it's left or right at some point,
everyone's willing to acknowledge it, but only on
the other side. So we all know we
don't wanna acknowledge it when we're winning. That's
a that's a that's a childish thing to
do.
So this to me is one more thing
in that step that's gonna drive people to
go, well, come on. He's clearly being persecuted,
so how can he be on their side?
Well, let's wait and see what happens.
Man, I I I mean this every time
I say it. I genuinely hope that you're
right about what you think he is. And
that he is gonna save us all from
what's coming. I really hope that.
Who wouldn't?
I just think there's too much going on
that shows us that's not real. And again,
that's not being black pilled. That's about highlighting
that the fake choice that the people that
are doing this to you are putting in
front of you is not the real choice.
Hey. You give me give me Ron Paul.
I'll vote for him right now. Give me
plenty of other people out there that I
believe actually have good intentions for positive change,
and I will support them whether or not
you think the vote's part of it. 100%.
That that's the illusion
that we pretend that one person from left
and right with 40 plus percent of the
population registers as independent is somehow your choices.
Guys, I mean, it's just so obvious, and
I know everybody who is not part of
the team smart politics mania sees it. But
most of you still get pulled into voting
one side or the other.
I'm not even trying to get into the
voting conversation now because that's an easy way
to scare people right back into it because
you don't feel like you have any other
options. All I'm trying to get at is
for people to be honest about what we're
dealing with. You wanna vote for them and
you think it's gonna make a difference? I'll
never dissuade you from that. Do what you
think is right.
But we need to be honest about who
these people are before you go into that.
Now here's Thomas Massie making a valid point.
I I like what he's been saying.
Elon Musk's, again, points out what Mike Lee
says. Chuck Schumer, remove the mask. Democrat victory
equals this, which okay. Don't you love how
these games go? Well, you know, peep people
say a lot of things,
especially politicians.
Now I'm not gonna say for we know
it's exactly what's gonna happen. But all I'm
saying is this is something he's somebody's saying,
when this happens, this will happen. And then
this whole narrative my point is, if you
think for one second
well, I get well, I should finish the
point. What they're saying is, what this means
is permanent Democrat rule forever.
Okay? I don't even know why in the
world that would only end of the day,
again, if you my opinion, they're all the
government. It's a game. Left and right making
you think you're fine. They're the government convincing
you to basically
justify why Trump is in power.
Because the point here is this is a
person who's saying, if this, we're gonna do
that. And the idea is that no more
filibuster. We're gonna make sure we always control
the
and Elon says, worth understanding that the implications
of of this turn America into a one
party state. Well, guess what? You're already there,
ladies and gentlemen. And what's funny about it
is even the Republicans are saying that because
that's my point from before. It's a uni
party. The Republicans have joined the Democrats, and
now we're fighting against that. Okay. So if
everybody believes we're already in a one party
uni party situation for the most part, what
makes how do you make sense of this?
That you're telling us that you're going to
continue to do that? And, like, I just
the narrative, they're so splintered, and it doesn't
make any it's all about saying,
side with the people we're justifying right now.
And every election that well, I mean, we
are I'm gonna play a clip in a
minute. Both sides are saying the most important
election of your lifetime. But guess what? Everyone
seems to think that now.
Funny how it happens every 2 years, literally
every 2 years, not just presidential elections. Every
2 years, somebody says this is the most
important election. And we used to all laugh
at how dumb that was, but apparently, everyone's
drinking it up right now, at least within
the paradigm.
Thomas Massie comes in with some logic
and says, to be honest, we kind of
already have that. Nancy Pelosi and Hakim Jeffries
voted to keep Mike Johnson as speaker. Uh-oh.
Hold on a minute.
So you mean there's an overlap and they're
helping keep a republican in power? Yeah. Because
it's not really what's going on. They're not
really as divided as they pretend. And it
says, a few months ago when we we
forced the question, thus exposing the unit party
that exists.
So Thomas Massie is holding out that they're
the illusion that you're the, you know,
dem the republican party is another last saving
grace against the democrats. They're gonna take over
the world. Do you realize this is the
narrative literally every time, but a different lep
different levels of concern?
And on top of that,
I just made this point. So we're we
have Dolce Gabbard, the democrat. Okay? Donald Trump,
he used to be a democrat. Okay. Elon
used to be a democrat. Hold on a
minute.
So are you saying now that the republicans
are are are supposed to be like the
democrats are the ones that see it? Or,
like, are are you saying the democrats
that have shifted are somehow the only ones
that are being are worthy of I just
don't even how you make sense of that
without laughing at how ridiculous this all is.
And now here, just a thought made a
good point in all this. Now I'll come
back to that because I I have the
tweet that I'll make a point about it.
She says, why would the most powerful empire
in the world allow a president to come
in and take the power? Now it's the
point a lot of people have made. George
Carlin has a famous joke about it. Right?
If voting had any effect, they wouldn't let
you do it. We love to love it.
We love to laugh about that, but it's
more honest and real than you realize.
Now it doesn't have to be that it's
always been that way. But let's ask ourselves
if you get to a position where we
all see it. This rising, like, your new
world order or one world governor. Whatever you
see building, you see the centralization of power.
And we're gonna pretend that when they've never
been more centralized, they're gonna go, okay. We
just hope we win this time.
I mean, really? I mean, we have to
acknowledge how naive that is.
I mean, we are we have decades long
plans, and they're gonna just hope they keep
winning and staying in power?
I mean, come on. I mean, we really
have to be honest about how
silly that sounds.
Just where is the logic in this? If
Trump or RFK Junior are such threats to
the establishment,
do you really think they would be allowed
to waltz in the White House and force
them to relinquish their power?
No. Somebody would go, well, they just tried
to kill him. Well, you know, I I
think there's very clear reason to ask what
actually happened there.
I'm not I'm not even saying that I'm
convinced that it was fake or whatever else.
I'm just saying for whatever, we we ended
up at a point where nothing adds up
and we're all moving forward.
Guy didn't even have an injury in his
ear for f's sake. I don't understand how
we have to convince people there's something wrong
there. But whatever. I'm the crazy one.
And it says, how would they do this?
In regard to forcing relinquished power? Guns? Drones?
Military?
Would they just ask nicely?
And this behemoth of power would say, sure.
Forget the centuries of war and genocide that
we've manufactured to attain this. Forget the 1,000,000
we've starved and the 1,000,000,000 we've hoarded in
resources. It's all yours now. It's what the
people want after all.
Supporting Trump or RFK or Kamala Harris or
any politician is not anti establishment.
That is the most true statement of the
day, guys. You're voting in the establishment.
People in positions of power don't get there
by being agitators,
or disruptors or dissidents, especially in the way
the world is now, especially the way the
US government is now.
And we and what's funny is we all
know that. In certain context, everyone points that
out, but not when it comes up against
your your chosen ideologue.
They said she says, they get there by
aligning and pledging allegiance.
If you don't see this, I'm sorry, but
you are still trapped.
I really agree with that.
Now again, that's what they would call black
pill.
But is it?
Like, I mean, she if if you let's
just take the sake of conversation that she's
correct, and I believe she is. How is
it black pilled if what you're trying to
do is show people the solution?
To say, look. We need to get away
from the trap we're in. We have been
we've fallen into this cave and all we
see are the shadows on the wall. And
if we can't step out of it,
we're only gonna ever be in this cave.
Like, we have to recognize the wall has
been pulled over our eyes.
To call it black pill to try to
save people from the illusion is unreal to
me. Now, again, even if we're wrong,
you can't call that black pill because the
in the inherent point is that we're trying
to pull you out of what we see
as the illusion.
Tiberias says, I don't think there's a single
reasonable argument to vote for either of the
mainstream parties in either the US or the
UK ever again. Okay. This brings it down
to a much more specific point, whether you
even wanna vote.
Now you know my opinion. I made it
very clear. I don't think I think the
evidence is shockingly obvious that we all acknowledge
again when the context is not works for
us. Whether they cheat, they steal, voting machines,
and other countries, or whatever we all love
to throw in there, we all always admit
it, accept what it matters.
Because we all go right back and cycle
through. Well, some people do.
The point here is that
a lot of people, as this guy would
do, is argue, well, you've just given up.
Is that what he's doing? He seems very
politically active to me.
The guy says, what a cop out.
Okay? And I said, the cop out is
pretending that you're more politically active than he
is because you check a box every 4
years. Or said every so often.
And that box represents the same government.
Whichever one.
You're on a hamster wheel. He's affecting change.
Now, yes. That's my opinion. I guarantee people
will disagree.
But the overall point is if you think
for one second that that voting process, even
if you are actually voting somebody in, is
the most politically active thing you can do?
My god. You are not paying attention.
And then realizing how obvious it is that
there are ways they can circumvent your vote.
That's not even up for debate.
Or going to the level I'm at, in
my opinion, well, I I believe, but I'm
what I what I'm giving for is my
opinion is that there is no translation. That
we have been manipulated to the point to
where you are not even engaging in this
process.
As they love to point at anybody, usually
actually fair elections, and say fake, fake, fake,
fake, fake. Why do you think that is?
One is control and destabilization, but also to
project away from looking at what they're doing
and acting like they're the ones calling out
fake elections. They can't be the ones
blatantly lying to you. Oh, yeah. I think
they are.
But that's the point is that there's so
many other things. So even if you think
this makes a difference,
realizing that to get you to fall back
into a position where that's the only thing
you do,
well, there's a whole 4 year period there
where there's more going on. My point is
that there are a lot of people that
act like that's the the only, if not
the most important thing.
I disagree.
He says, I don't see how being a
bystander is affecting change. Okay. So this is
the whole point.
He's of the mind that if you don't
vote, you're not doing anything.
That is a very prominent conversation right now,
and I think that's important to reflect on.
I simply said, if you take bystander from
what I wrote, I'm not sure how you
tie your shoes in the morning.
I mean, really, think about the idea that
you're out there trying I mean, at the
end of the day, if you can't recognize
that voting is only one part of this,
then you're falling for one of the many
illusions within this system.
Dave Smith says, now that RFK Junior has
effectively ended his campaign, a few thoughts on
the impact. As many of you know, I
was very critical of his position on Israel,
but leaving that aside, this campaign was truly
unique in many ways. He made health the
focus of his campaign. This is unprecedented. Polar
pole,
prioritizing human
health meant a full repudiation of the anti
science, anti human COVID lockdown and vaccine. It
also meant dealing with issues that never come
up in politics, namely that we lead the
world in chronic health issues. This is something.
I'm embarrassed to admit it. I paid far
too little attention. After Bobby's campaign, it's apparent
how insane it is that this is never
an issue in national politics.
What could possibly be more important than the
health of our children?
Now, again, realizing that, yes, he has made
made very good strides in this conversation before
this.
But realizing
how I mean, just Trump alone.
With the interest he has, the business he's
tied to. I I mean, these people don't
care about these things. They care about making
you think they do, which is part of
why they've brought, brought, brought, brought on the
token RFK. Look, now we're pro environment.
No. And that's not how that works. But
the end of the day,
I think it's important to recognize that just
because they're
doing this in other context doesn't mean I
mean, there's evidence of other overlaps. I mean,
just with Israel alone,
it's obvious that you can't pretend that you
support these things when Israel was look. I
mean, do you realize how much the environment
is being destroyed based on what they're using?
But it says he was heroic on the
war in Ukraine, which I don't necessarily agree
with. I think a lot of these are
statements, not action.
Free speech, 3 letter agencies, big pharma. Well,
again, a lot of this is just what
he said he would do. Now with after
what he's now done, I question all of
that.
Action is what I care about. And he's
got a lot of great action back before
all this. I agree with that. That's why
I promoted a lot of what he did
before. After his Israel statements, I just have
a lot of thought. But it says on
top of all of of all of this,
Bobby is genuinely smart and kind man. Well,
I don't know him, so I can't speak
to that. But that is but that was
so refreshing in contemporary politics. The fact that
someone who reads books and treats people with
decency was running such
a con so was such a contrast to
what we were used to. And, again, I
kinda start to feel like this, you know,
worship you know, the idea that I don't
know how we think we can get these
things
from people that it it's all you're showing
people things.
Realize that whether or not he was running
before, he's a Kennedy. They know they're in
the spotlight. A lot of these people are
always projecting what they want you to see
that they are.
I'm not saying I think that. I'm just
saying it's weird that we can start going,
he is this and he's a good person.
He did that. I don't agree with that.
I think it's dangerous.
We need to stand back and just treat
them like, you know, action matters. That's it.
What have you done? What's your track record?
It says,
I'm glad that RFK ran. I think we're
better off the country for it. I know
I've been hard on him at times, but
from the bottom of my heart, thank you
for him running. No. I mean, I generally
like what he said. I do. I just
I just wanna be clear that I I'm
very resistant to any idea of hero worship.
But I said, and this was the main
point for
me. All that, he would agree with everything
he just said, and then he drove all
that positive momentum and support right into the
hands of mister operation Warp Speed.
So what happened?
To me, that's a very hard thing to
to be okay with.
I said, I would love to agree with
your take, but that all flies out the
window when your last move
undermines all those principles.
Moves like this ensure the cycle will never
change, which as far as I'm concerned, was
the primary thing his followers thought he was
going to change.
This person says, Ryan, it would be amazing.
Let me go back. We'll make sure I
don't miss the
there we go. It says
oh, yeah. Because this is the one. I'm
glad I did that. So this is the
one. This person
so I just ended where I just said,
so the ensures the cycle never change. Conservative
nurse Kelly says, so, you would rather the
democrats win who mandated the vaccines on tons
of Americans?
Is that what happened?
The the ones who are destroying our country,
that who you truly hate Trump more than
you love our country? Okay. Obviously, you know
where I'm gonna go with this.
Assumption, obviously. That's no, dummy. I'm not saying
you have a 2 party illusion. I don't
want either of them. But the point is
they can't see
anything outside of the control. They have nothing
exists outside of her or him, Left or
right. A Republican or Democrat. That's all that
matters.
And just to be clear,
Trump
initiated the Warp Speed program, which is why
this all happened. He initiated the lockdowns. He
initiated the emergency.
That's the reality. They wouldn't have been able
to do any of the lockdowns without his
state of emergency and what he began. And
the, this, Production
Defense Act, which was martial law for production.
I mean, guys, these are bad moves
in every context, especially
now that we know we were all played.
And the mandates were only possible and happened
during his administration
because of what he initiated.
Now it's funny how literally everything anywhere, even
from governors that happens under Biden's administration, is
Biden did it, Biden did it. Which by
the way, kind of usually is the way
it goes. They're the president. They're responsible. Right?
But during Trump's, well, the governors made their
own choices and they did sure. There's a
level I mean, they're both are honest. The
point is that Trump's administration, he's the president.
At the end of the day, his choices
allowed that to happen.
If it was Biden and, like, that's what
we saw next, everything was his fault. The
point is, it's all your government's fault. Your
government allowed this to happen. Your government mandated
shots. Your government
is the problem.
So at the end of the day,
I don't want either of them. And that's
what I'm trying to highlight. The assumption that
I must want the opposite, that's back to
Trump and Clinton. It's the same thing. You
always want Clinton to win that. No. No.
No. I want a real choice.
But it said that she says, the ones
who are destroying your country, they all are.
To them, it's the democrats. That's it. They're
the bad guys. It's very naive. And it
says you truly hate Trump more than you
love our country. That seems like a statement.
No. That's not true. I don't hate any
of them really. I think at the end
of the day, hate is something reserved for
people that are committing genocide. I'll tell you
that right now. I hate all those people.
But at the end of the day, I
just acknowledge what they are. I think these
are war criminals
that have murdered people. He murdered Soleimani under
the cloak of diplomacy. That's a war crime,
guys. There's no way around it.
He occupied and murdered people in Syria under
the guise of fighting Assad, and they stole
the oil. These are bad criminal moves.
On top of that,
is Israel support is disgusting.
These are openly committing genocide people.
They're gloating about it.
And so my point is, if you wanna
talk about hating the country,
you know who hates the country more than
anybody where they realize it or not? The
people that are blindly acquiescing to the government
power structure. You wanna look at some of
our foreign presidents that go back to our
founding fathers, that's what they would tell you.
I think it,
I forget exactly who it was.
Was
it,
I got the name in my head anyway,
that that ultimately they blindly serve the president.
I mean, they could look it up real
quick
is servile.
Let me see if it pops up.
There it is, perfect.
It is Oh, that's right. Theodore Roosevelt. And
again, it's not that I'm saying I love
Theodore Roosevelt, which is always people always do
that. How to use the word? Anyway, the
quote words are true,
whoever says them, if they're true.
Let me bring this up so you can
see it. It's thick so you can I'll
include it in the show notes. Sorry, I'm
struggling with my left hand.
There we go.
So, the point
to announce that there must be no criticism
of the president, or that we are to
stand by the president, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but it is
morally treasonable to the American people.
Alright. So anyway, in the chat, I'm I'm
not supporting Theodore Roosevelt. But the point
is that the idea is that
that is what ultimately we're doing right now.
That you are blindly like, yeah. It doesn't
matter. She's worse. Well, that's that is morally
treasonable to the American people. That is I
agree with. But I said, nope. Embarrassing wrong
assumption. Typical response from one who's lost in
the 2 party illusion.
Trump is war operation warp speed. And despite
the the couched response that we all know
you're already typing, that they all put that
they all pushed excuse me. They all pushed
it on us, the government. Because the point
is they all wanna say, Trump didn't force
it. He let you choose. That's not the
reality. Narratives are one thing. At the end
of the day, the policy they put in
place is why this happened.
And I said, I hate all of them.
Well, I guess it challenges what I just
said. The point is that I equally dislike
all of them or you could say hate.
I did I just I tend to I
said that in response to what she said.
I tend to
dislike the word hate in general because it
it just I think it ultimately shows a
a an emotional response to something that's not
always supposed to be emotional. Like, we can
have you get the point. But it says,
equally, but okay. They they but okay. But
aren't they democrats?
Right? Just trying to make that point I
was saying before. Like, the the point is
at the end of the day, if your
whole idea is Democrats are bad and you're
fighting the Democrats, it's weird how all these
people are
just moments ago Democrats. I find that funny.
But she says, not at all. The American
people don't trust Republicans anymore
either because they are in unison with the
democrats creating a uni party. You see my
point?
It's why
we love Trump. He goes against the grain
as does Elon and RFK.
Okay. So they're all democrats, or at least
they were. So what's funny is the idea
is that 2, 1 is the democrat part,
but the 2 is that ultimately you're talking
about the unit party.
Like, isn't that's what all that's what we're
trying we are in a an illusion.
And the idea that you think these people
that break out of it for 10 seconds
and go, look, we're the ones fighting it,
and jump right back. It's you're just you're
being played by the same illusion. That's what
we're trying to reach you with.
That's it. And I said, you just described
the 2 party illusion. You guys pretend like
you see through it, then vote for a
Republican.
That's pretty willfully naive from where I'm standing.
I just hope that can I hope that
will reach somebody out there who doesn't see
the broken logic there?
Include this for you.
I like that quote.
Come on. There we go.
Here's another another statement. This person says supporting
Trump is no different than supporting Harris. You're
standing with Zionists who are doing the bidding
of corporate parasites.
Tai says, it may be an illusion of
choice.
So keep that in mind through the whole
comment. And it it's illusion of choice. Okay.
If that's what we get,
either pick the better illusion
or don't pick.
Okay. So it's an illusion,
which implies that they're not different
or being played,
but you might as well pick the better
illusion
or don't pick at all.
I can't even believe that wait. Now, again,
always remember these could be bots. That's per
I mean, that's a flip of the coin
these days. Legitimately, with how many bots are
online. 50% of the internet.
Way more on Twitter, so I think it's
more than that.
But this is the this is the point
I'm making. This is where people are. And
they even when seeing it, they can't break
away from it. That is a cult.
So I'm the one saying, well, don't pick
then. What difference does it make if it
doesn't if it's an illusion?
We shouldn't just not pick though. We should
be leaning in in every possible way and
making a big statement about how it's an
illusion. That's why I keep talking about abstention.
I wanna abstain on the record. I want
you to tally that. I want you to
show people that every single election,
now more than ever, more people don't partake
than anybody else. And they would love to
make that statement on the record to show
people at the end of the day if
you would actually tally it and be honest
about it.
We say this every time. The largest voting
block in the election, only growing to this
point, are people that do not participate. Not
because they're lazy or don't want to, but
because they're they see the
problem, by and large. Look around. Ask people.
They're like, I this is all broken. It's
all they're all stealing and everything's broken. The
the machines don't work. Whatever it is.
Then the largest block, usually 40 something percent
of the people that do, register as independent.
And we're still to pretend like the 2
minorities within all of that are the only
choices we get. We are lost in this.
So continuing, starting over, he says it may
be an illusion of choice. If that's what
we get, either pick the better choice or
don't pick.
Does it matter when it goes on with
or without your participation?
Well, yes. It would when you give them
the allowance to do so. Your vote within
the illusion, knowing it's an illusion, is you
going, yes.
Do it again next time. Which they may,
either way.
But if your whole point is that it
won't change either way, then maybe don't participate
in order to keep it going. Maybe try
a different path. Maybe stand up and protest
that whole thing. You see what I'm saying?
Any number of directions. But the idea that
this is the adult thing to do, it's
just embarrassing.
It says there is a real life affirming
movement behind Trump. That's the only thing to
hang your hat on. But wait, you just
said it was an illusion. You started the
statement by saying it's an illusion of choice
or maybe. So might as well pick the
better illusion, and then you end by saying,
but Trump is real. We get behind that.
I just I got it. I can't help
but laugh at how ludicrous this all is.
And I know you see it.
Here's Brad Miller. We read this before. I've
endorsed no one for president because no one
has earned my vote. And he goes on,
you know, I I guess we can oh,
it's I I don't wanna read the whole
thing. We read this before. He's simply saying
that he doesn't support any of them. Strategically,
from the perspective of putting a Trump in
the White House, Kennedy's speech was objectively great.
I thought he explained his decision ex exception
exceptionally well, but I disagree with the bedrock
premise. I fundamentally disagree with the premise that
real change in this country can come via
Trump. That's the important part. And he's simply
highlighting all these people. Yeah. He's right in
line with me. Alright. We had we had
a great conversation about this in our last
interview.
He's calling it out, just like we are.
This person says, Kennedy actually spoke to citizens
like they were real.
Harris
slammed back a Chardonnay. Giggled, yes, queen. Went
home.
Which is really just obviously, that's not exactly
what happened. That's them framing her as being
ridiculous. Right? Like the whole yes queen thing.
But and my point in showing you this,
are we really this easy to manipulate?
So all they have to do is come
out and just act like you matter?
Why? Because they counterbalance you with all these
creature morons that they there you go. Come
out and be like, you're real and I
care about you. And they go, wow. A
rogue guy pulled them in. They're gonna win.
Like, this is we can't be this simple.
And on top of that, realize that why
do you think she's so ridiculous?
Like, don't we at least consider that this
is all you know? I don't know. It
just it's funny how we all, at some
point, can see that there's clearly a manipulation
going on, but then when you have one
of the most obvious forms of it slapping
you in the face, you just don't wanna
see it.
Whitney Webb says, given all the hype about
the RFK Junior team up with Trump and
what it means for health care, I have
some questions.
Many funders of Trump, such as Joe Lonsdale
and Elon Musk, as well as JD Vance
himself, have major investments in biotechnology,
gene therapies, and companies deeply invested in mRNA
and DNA vaccine technology.
Trump stands by, right to this very day,
Operation Warp Speed, which produced mRNA vaccines and
do of dubious efficacy and safety, some of
which were made with the help of companies
tied to Lonsdale's VC among others.
And here,
since I'm I'm not gonna get to the
other part today, I don't think, I wanna
I'll play this really quickly.
Just so we don't forget
this is still what he's
saying.
All people have died under COVID this year,
by the way, under Joe Biden
than under you. And more people took the
vaccine this year, so people are questioning how
Well, no. The vaccine worked, but Yeah. Some
people aren't. The ones the ones that get
very sick and go to the hospital are
the ones that don't take their vaccine. But
it's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected.
Look. The results of the vaccine are very
good. And if you do get it, it's
a very minor form. People aren't dying when
they take the vaccine.
We all know that's false.
Everything he said there. No, it's not helping
them. Yes, they are. It's causing I mean,
it's incredible.
And even even Candace was trying to set
him up to be like, yeah, it's a
it was Biden made it worse. Nope. He
doesn't wanna do that. He wants to say,
I did it. I won. I did the
good thing. It's my hubris.
It's dangerous.
So she goes on to say, will RK
Jr be opposing the issue of these technologies
as he seeks to tackle the disease epidemic
in the US in a future Trump administration?
Will he allow the health, DARPA, ARPA h,
to continue to operate?
Which if you don't remember is a very
problematic entity that was created by Trump's daughter,
which is really just a extrapolation of the
same Or excuse me,
Began with her. Biden's administration just flipped the
h on the other side and told us
it was their thing. It's all that's that's
the point. It's all your government. Framed with
a left right slant that all goes in
the same direction. To get you from one
side or the other to keep the thing
going down the road.
It says to continue to operate the heart
DARPA for health, essentially, which should terrify all
of us.
He will he allow the Peter Thiel
and Joe Lonsdale cofounded Palantir to continue to
collect and analyze American's health data? Continue.
And genetic data. With no meaningful oversight into
how they use that data and if they
share it with other government agencies,
they contact for the CIA, contract for the
CIA. Now point is, people would love to
believe that RFK would be the one who
would step up and stop that. That's what
her point is. Do you really think that's
gonna happen? Do you think that there'd be
so much investment from these people? Or, you
know, with Israel overlap or any of these
things? That somehow having him there is gonna
change that dynamic?
I hope you're right. But it's pretty naive
to think that based on, I don't know,
the entire history of this country. Every presidential
administration looking I mean, it's always the same
thing.
These are interests of the government that go
long back before one administration or the other,
and it's all continued.
And you can see clearly that Trump is
leaning in. I mean, you're let's not pretend
like the Teal Vance
infusion into his administration is not gonna guide
the whole damn thing. You think that RFK
having a concern about Palantir and Health Data
is gonna suddenly change that major investment?
I just think we're being played. And it
says I she says I agree that there
is a major health care crisis in the
US, but identifying the problem is one thing.
Will these experimental technologies be used or promoted
as part of the solution?
I think we all know that's happening. He
won't give up on the shot. I she
says I think it's important to know, and
it will it seems like not many are
asking these questions. I was like, she framed
that perfectly. I'm giving you my thoughts on
it. The point is to frame this in
a way that gets people out there that
support this to go, well, we should ask
that.
Vote for Trump if you want, but at
least acknowledge that there's a problem here. There's
no stated solution from anybody. Not Kamala, not
Trump. It's very clear
that that should at least worry you if
you see the problem that he keeps hiding,
which is the entire point of the injection
and where that's all going.
But as long as you make it a
meme, apparently, they're gonna fall for it.
Maja. Make America healthy again.
That's this is it. For the podcast, it's
a
a picture of Trump and RFK, that famous
one with the kind of we can shake,
which I love.
Maha.
That's as simple as that. That's RFK posted
that.
Again, I I hope guys I really hope
that's in the bed. I mean, obviously,
I'm I'm a huge advocate for the change
in the health field, but I just sadly
don't think that's what's gonna happen. If I'm
wrong, I will
cheer for that being for that,
mischaracterization.
Because I mean, again, we should always want
that positive thing. And I'm just trying to
inform you based on what I think is
the reality.
Now here
is the point I was making before. This
is now interesting. I I framed it on
the title today.
Democrats take over the Republican party.
Now my whole point is that they're one
thing. Right? So if we can't stand back
for a second and go, wait a minute.
Isn't this interesting how they're sort of trade
look. We were just talking about the whole,
like, trading card dynamic where there's kinda swapping
players like some kind of fantasy football team.
It's funny to me. Now there's like, well,
look at this. They all used to be
democrats.
And,
Rothman says democrats are not liberal. They're left
as authoritarians, which Elon then shared and says,
yeah. That's what they're turning into.
Weird statement too, by the way too, because
you could be arguing he's talking about this.
It says 3 former Democrats who had enough.
Okay.
Isn't it interesting though that you have the
leading entities in this administration, at least as
it stands, you know, Vance being the aspect
of it not included that are
former
democrats, like, from inside the dynamic of how
the democrats are, like, the biggest boogeyman ever.
I find it strange that you wouldn't have
like, if this wasn't the ideologue situation,
like, it wasn't Trump that they've all put
their, like, faith in, like, literally,
I would think that a lot of Republicans
would be like, man, that's weird. Like, we
should be concerned about this. Like, if all
of a sudden, Biden and Kamala and everyone,
they just switched to Republican and said, we're
running for Republicans because we've seen the light.
They wouldn't want that. No. The point is
that these people have become invested in the
ideology
of the current,
you know, republican MAGA overlap.
So they just don't wanna see it. Now,
obviously, it may not be the case. I
just think that's interesting.
And overall, what it shows me is that
it's all the same damn thing. If they
can just swap sides, that means there's no
principles.
Again, it's not about some and this is
Team Smart politics.
If we're to pretend that you could just
jump to the other side, that means that
you never actually held the principles you said
or that they're all very similar, which makes
my point for me. Because the idea is
we're supposed to believe that the Republicans and
Democrats have very different principles.
And they list them off. I mean, I
think they swap all the time. But they
list it off. Here's what we stand for.
Here's what they stand for. And then you
wake up one day and go, well, all
these people over here are bad, so I'm
gonna jump to the other side?
No. If you actually believe you were a
democrat and it was based on your principles,
you would say, I am a Democrat. They
are not.
So let me be the lone person. And,
hey, I'll even work with the Republicans if
I believe that they're good people, but I'm
still a Democrat because these are my principles.
I don't know why I didn't explain that.
The way that they jump, this whole red
whale, Lord, I'm shifting sides. We should be
laughing at how ridiculous that is. But no,
it's because they're going, Wow, we're gonna win!
They're taking it out. We're on our it's
like a football game to half these people.
And I think we're all starting to see
that. Maybe that's what they like. Maybe I'm
the one that I mean, maybe we're out
of the conversation because everybody enjoys the game
and we just I hope not. Now, I
honestly have more faith in the human species
and especially Americans for because of that. I
mean, I don't mean it especially as any
other country, but I mean more so than
in this context. As an American election,
I have faith in Americans to see this.
That's even a unique thing within the independent
media.
Again, if you're gonna call me black pilled,
acknowledge that's simply not the reality. I have
faith in Americans to see the lie. I
believe the government
misrepresents the illusion. I believe that COVID during
COVID 19, everybody was seeing through it and
it wasn't a partisan thing. I think right
now with Israel, the world around is starting
to see through it. What's more positive than
that?
What I do think I see is that
the American
US dynamic is trying to pull us right
back in.
All of
it. So just a thought points out, thank
God that the guy who said Israel's genocide
in Gaza was a moral war, the guy
who pushed experimental vaccines on us, and the
guy who wants a microchip in our brains
are gonna save us from the deep state.
Hey, maybe. As the q went on go,
I'm gonna have gotta have insiders to fight
the inside or whatever the dumb thing is.
We still get stuff like that. That I've
already seen a tweet like that coming out
about some of these people.
But that's that's easy way to pacify people.
Right? Just trust the plan. They've got it
all figured out for you.
Well, here's Jill Stein making a great point,
but doesn't mean I believe that she's our
side. I'll be real honest about that is
that of all the people, she's the one
standout that seems to be really standing against
us.
But just the way I am,
I'm very jaded about all the political spectrum
because, I mean, look how long look how
far back. Show me one person throughout all
this time that we can see that really
stands out as the honest and to me.
And what I mean, again, maybe say for
a Ron Paul, which I do believe.
At the end of the day,
I just have a hard time grasping that.
But once if if she gives me the
proof and the actions going forward that that's
the case, I'll I'll support that. And I'd
be not at the point within a broken
voting system, but I'll still say I think
she has the right path.
Like, increasingly feeling that way about Thomas Massie,
and I'm probably gonna be let down again.
Because that's just how I feel as ghosts.
But either way, my point is that it
shouldn't be about you say the right thing,
we support you. It should be action.
And I think that she has a lot
of problematic things like all of them do.
Siding with the wrong person, but it's all
politics to them. They all rationalize compromise, which
to me is a basically dirty word in
politics.
The point, she makes an excellent point right
here about Democrats and Republicans. But, of that
could be in the interest of getting her
to be the one seen.
But listen to this, and she the point
is right. If it sounds like democrats and
republicans are reading from the same script,
it's because they both work for the same
donors.
Uh-oh. She must be a racist. No. No.
She just recognizes the
static and obvious reality that they're being funded
by lobbyists.
Will be the most important election in the
history of our country. Oh my god. There
it is. Everyone says it. This election
is not only
the most important
of our lives. I double down.
It is one of the most
important in the life of our nation. Oh
my god. Now it's now it's it's the
same thing. It's just our our lives, the
history of this country, it's we hear it
every single time.
You'd think there was even a moment when
I started going, I know we say it
every time, but this time, they just skip
past that this time. This is the one
forever until the next one. And that one's
the most aborted lifetime.
Like, I got we it's just kinda point
that hope it breaks through to some people.
We're just like, well, yeah, it's pretty stupid.
It's pretty dumb. They keep saying every time.
And every time, it's like fever pitch. It's
because it's the only way they can get
people buying in to such a ridiculous illusion.
That's the reality in my opinion. Together we
will restore vision, strength, competence, and
we're gonna have a thing called common sense.
A president who leads
and listens,
who is realistic,
practical,
and has common sense.
No nation will question our power. No enemy
will doubt our might. That we
strengthen, not abdicate our global leadership.
An economy the likes of which nobody no
nation had ever seen China. We were beating
them. That America, not China, wins the competition
for the 21st
century. Isn't this interesting, guys? I mean, it
keeps going.
The point is the same. It's that it's
the same thing. Oh, they're communist. No. They're
fascist. They're the same thing. Like I said,
in my opinion, they're all authoritarian capitalists at
the end of the day. The Derek made
a great post about today.
The the complete, like, essentially miss like, I
don't even think it's misunderstanding. I think it's
a deliberate misrepresentation
of what those two things are.
Neither of them, not the republican party nor
the democrat party, are those things.
But that works for narratives and everyone loves
to get all worked up about the other
side,
but they're not the other side. They're the
same thing. They're pushing. And and what's funny
about this is they all like I showed
you the democrat convention and the republican convention.
They're all doing like, you saw the democrats
chanting over a Palestinian protest. You're going, USA.
USA. You'd be forgiven for not being able
to tell the difference between the two locations.
Of course, they would love to say that,
but it's all about personal issues. And at
the end of the day, government policy is
what we're talking about, not the identity that
they've convinced you of as individuals. Not talking
about the teams or politics. There's clear differences,
like, on the surface of republicans and democrats
in this paradigm. I think that's because they're
being engineered in their own way through this
paradigm.
But whatever it is, the point is that
from policy,
Kamala and Trump, whatever we're talking about, it
goes in the same direction. Do we we
can look back through history.
Narrative shift,
agenda stays the same. Our borders will be
totally secure. Our economy will soar.
We will return law and order to our
streets. After decades in law enforcement,
I know the importance
of safety and security,
especially at our border.
Last year, Joe and I brought together Democrats
and conservative Republicans
to write the strongest border bill in decades.
We want people to come into our country,
but they have to come into our country
legally.
We Hey. Enter the Save Act. I'll show
you that next. That's a digital ID Trojan
horse. Can
create an earned pathway to citizenship and secure
our border. I tell you this. We want
our hostages back,
and they better be back before I assume
office.
Oh, threat. Uh-oh. Otherwise, he's gonna drive peace
in the between in the Middle East. Right?
Yeah. That must be what he means. Well,
you will be paying a very big price.
Oh, never mind. He meant violence. My bad.
Obviously, you better give us back. What what?
I mean, think about what a dumb thing
it is to say. Who are you talking
to, Trump? You talking to Hamas?
Give us back our hostages. You mean the
Israeli Americans that got taken from illegal settlements?
Give them back to who? What are you
talking about? Everybody wants them back other than
the Israeli government.
But it doesn't matter because it's a good
cheer moment to go, yay. He's gonna fight
bad guys.
It's just sad. I'm embarrassed
by what a lot of these people do
on all sides of the paradigm.
If you recognize the reality that they've been
intentionally breaking some kind of a deal so
that they could stay in power her and
killing their own people. That's what Israelis are
saying. And he stands up and gets a
cheer line from Americans who are too stupid
to see what's really going on. I shouldn't
say that. I'm frustrated by that. But at
the end of the day, don't know the
reality.
It kills
me. It kills me. Oh, and he's got
a bandage on a year without an injury
because clearly, 12 days later, it's completely good
to go. I will always ensure Israel has
the ability to defend itself. And now Iran
is very close to having a nuclear weapon.
Oh, yes. Here here we go again. Despite
the US government saying otherwise and the I
the International Atomic Energy Agency saying otherwise.
But who I I wonder where he got
that from. Who was the one prominently saying
that lie for vast 50? Oh, yeah. Or
Israel. That's right. I will never hesitate
to take whatever action is necessary
to defend our forces and our interests against
Iran and Iran backed terrorists. We gave our
military
almost $800,000,000,000
As commander in chief,
I will ensure
America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting
force in the world. Anybody wanna show me
the air between these people? World.
America's on the cusp of a new golden
age. I will make sure
that we leave the world
into the future.
Just like our ancestors, we must now come
together. It is now our turn
to do what generations
before us have done. We will press forward,
and together, we will win win.
We are charting
a new way
forward.
Forward.
My god. Guys, I'm this actually scares me.
Like, this is terrifying. The reality of how
transparently stupid this is, like, they are literally
giving the same speech.
And everyone's like, yeah. We gotta fight those
democrats who were in the other room going,
yes. The same things. Yes. The republicans are
bad.
It's just it's crazy.
And I know you guys can feel it.
And I just this is what we're trying
to fight. This is what we're talking about
at the beginning.
We're trying to build something that can actually
resist this overwhelming propaganda momentum that that's pushed
forward by the minority of the conversation.
It really is uncomfortable
because of how aggressive a lot of this
is too.
Now, Caitlin Johnstone put out a great post.
The the the three thought project is where
I saw this. They put it up as
well. Trumpism and anti Trumpism are both fake
decoy revolutions serving the empire.
Now it's it's a it's a long thread.
It's a good read. Make sure you check
it out. But think about how important that
is to consider.
That ultimately, it's everything we just told you.
That what they're doing
is this is the false dichotomy. This is
the 2 party illusion in and of itself.
They just are reimagining this 2 party breakdown
in different ways. I think just testing the
waters, quite frankly. I mean, whether it's gonna
be another third party dynamic or whether like,
the for the last so many years now,
it's been basically Trump or not Trump. That's
what this whole thing has been. She's making
a great point. And all of it serves
the empire.
Now I wanted to read this to you.
This is something I put out when I'm
really actually frustrated about because
this
video I made,
all this is back in 2016.
I wrote this out and I made a
video. I don't know if you remember this.
It was a long time ago. Well before
the daily wrap up and all that. And
it was basically video. And by the way,
it was at a time when I was
not still under the impression that the voting
was gonna make a difference at the end
of the day, at least in the context
of the US current situation.
Not that in you know, as I said
before, voting is paramount in an actual representative
government.
But I'm mad because I wanted to see
this clip again when I stumbled across this.
I remember how I remember I liked this.
And it was a breakdown of the different
clips of both left and right, and it
showed you the illusion of it all.
And as I said, the title is of
the election deception of 2016. See how funny
to how consistent ultimately I've been with these
arguments
even though I'm I'm I've evolved. I've now
come to the conclusion that I don't think
voting is even on it's not even having
an effect on the outcome. But I I
could be wrong, and I leave it to
you to decide for yourself. But it's called
the election deception of 2016, a call to
vote your heart. Now my point at this
time
was that, well, you know, if if again,
at the time, thinking voting would make a
difference, in my opinion. I think at the
time, I was talking about the idea of
the third option.
And which was, well, look.
If we're lied to every time about the
polls and everything that happens, which by the
way, was exactly what happened. Right? I wrote
this before that. What ended up happening?
Clinton's gonna win 99%.
And they lied. Right? It was obviously not
the reality.
So I called that correct at this time,
and the point was, which I think we
a lot of us saw,
was my my my pot the the thought
I wanted to put in your mind about
the 3rd party point of this. Think about
me. Right? 2016, you wrote this.
And the idea is right now,
if you think your voting makes a difference,
consider this point about how they're driving you
into anything.
Really, only
the 2 selected options that both lead in
the same direction.
So I I said that the entire election
process and please remember this was 2016. My
my opinion of voting has changed. This entire
election process has been overrun with fraud,
corruption,
collusion, and deceit.
Never before seen, at least to me at
that time, or rather never before revealed in
US history.
So much so that the rest of the
world is at full attention to watch as
the American experiment crumbles in real time.
Every American is enlisted at a young age
and told their vote matters.
That even one vote can make a difference.
Yet, that entire mantra came crashing down this
election cycle when all were told that their
vote would only truly matter
if and when they vote for 1 of
the 2 preapproved state sponsored candidates.
And we're told this would be democracy at
its finest.
All the same mantras we get every time.
Internationally,
intentionally
manipulated polls are thrown out to convince the
people that a 3rd party vote would indeed
not count.
Yet, despite proof of these manipulations, many continue
to fulfill their programming and vote plan on
voting in line.
Consider for a moment the previous claim,
of which there is ample proof,
knowing that the polls being broadcasted by mainstream
channels are falsified in order to give you,
the voter, the impression that the majority is
voting for either Clinton or Trump.
And see, my point was not about one
of the others, about the ought the third
possibility.
And I says, consider for a moment the
possibility that the actual majority,
same point now if you think your voting
matters, could in fact be voting for someone
else.
Maybe this is the one time that untapped
majority that doesn't vote decides to step in.
Right? So maybe they are the majority, maybe
they're about to vote in somebody else, Joe
Stein for all we know.
And most likely are,
or there would be no need to falsify
the polls, is what I said at the
time. Right? The idea that there it's clearly
some deviation, so they're trying to lie to
you with polls. Right?
And I said, you then dutifully go off
this is a hypothetical. Right? So the hypothetical
being in a third party is actually moment
getting momentum
in the actual polls.
And so they come out and go, don't
do that. You're gonna throw it away. They
got 2%. They're not gonna get there. And
a lot of people fall for that. So
do you then go dutifully go off and
cast your vote reluctantly? Because you didn't really
want them for the lesser of 2 evils,
which is every time.
Because you're going, well, they both suck, but
she's way worse. Or he's more of a
maniac. So that's and that's all we get
right now.
This is still convinced by the onslaught of
propaganda
telling you that the age old adage, every
vote counts,
only applies when you stay within party lines.
Stupid.
Then consider that your one vote,
as misguided and manipulated as it may be,
could in fact be the winning vote
that steals away the presidency from a potentially
more deserving,
better suited, and morally sound third party option,
if you thought that was the case.
And all you had to do was vote
for who you actually believed in. Oh, gosh.
Crazy. Right? Actually voting for who you like.
And reali I mean, the point that I'm
making, as just I think it's clear,
is that that what what if that ended
up being the vote? The one that could've
made this happen and you be you fell
for those dumb polls. Voted for Trump or
Barack Obama, and you go and that's what
they ended up showing you anyway. And the
point is you could have made a difference
if you'd actually just followed your heart.
And I said, ultimately,
to allow the media to control your perception
of what is and is not possible
in the current election or what will or
will not count based on the current standings
will only lead you to settle for what
seems plausible,
to vote for their selection
and not for the candidate you truly feel
will rescue the America we once knew. And
that's an article I wrote a long time
ago, probably equally naive about the possibilities.
Or maybe I'm just more jaded today. Who
knows? Again, not in any way blackfield in
the concept of not wanting a solution or
seeing possible solutions. But just, I think, more
honest
about the reality of where we are.
And in that very point, doing everything we
can to find a solution within that bad
situation.
But I said, so I ask you today,
with this nation's future hanging in the balance,
I plead with you today to look into
your heart and cast your November vote for
the candidate you genuinely feel
will lead this country into a time of
prosperity and change.
1 who will put the people back in
their rightful place as the leaders of this
nation. Do not fall for the lesser of
2 evils ploy.
Follow your heart,
and do what you know to be right.
Very important, I thought.
Now, again, I've changed a little bit in
my perspective, but I still stand by the
idea.
Do you really wanna
flee into what they've convinced you is the
most plausible reality?
Oh, well, the adults in the room will
recognize that there's only 2 choices.
Really?
I mean, does that even sound like logic?
Like, we need to buck that ridiculously
controlling narrative.
What the the narrative is trying to paint
people like us as black pill people giving
up or copping out. I can't I mean,
have you been watching? Has that even remotely
what we're talking about?
You watch as this builds, especially as we
try to align with other people who see
through it.
It represents a threat to what they're doing.
I mark my words.
So as we I'm gonna probably read this
again as we get closer because, I mean,
again, even though I believe that it won't
translate,
I still want people to take the action
they believe in. I think that in of
itself will produce positive results within our society.
At the end of the day, we'll collectively
know that we're being lied to. I think
we already do. I think that's why this
is so desperate.
Now I also had a great interview. Oh,
I show I'm gonna leave this open so
I don't forget about it.
I I was kinda I thought I mean,
I kind of enjoyed
reading that for myself from a long from
a while ago, you know? But this is
an interview what I did with Sam Husseini,
just on the 24th August.
Or, I mean, 23rd maybe. But anyway, just
recently.
Understanding vote packs and how the 2 party
system protects the status quo. Now, I really
enjoyed this. We did It was about He
He's got a a thing called vote pact.
And I I'm very clear, at least somewhat
into it. I wanna make sure we got
a good conversation going where I'm like, you
know, I I really don't think our vote
translates. And I wanna be very upfront about
that. And he knows that. That's why we
we set this up. Because he he believes
in this and he wanted a genuine challenge
on it. Right? When I I I much
respect for that. Because he knows I'm not
gonna pull punches.
And so we get into this and we
talk about it. And my and my I
honestly genuinely see this of a lot of
positive in this. Whether or not you think
your vote translates that what he ultimately gets
at is that in this conversation this could
expose
the
illusion by doing this. Now the point of
it all is the idea that whatever you
think the validity of it is or the
possibility that ultimately recognizing that we're being driven
into the 2 party system, that we can
then make a pact with another voter
on the other side of the aisle.
That we and we both see the lesser
of 2 evils lie and you both wanna
vote for a 3rd party candidate. Whoever that
may be. So you make a pact.
And you say, well, we're both gonna make
a deal to both vote for 3rd party.
And then ultimately that would mean that it
would cancel out the idea that you'd be
taking it from the other side. And then
you'd also get to vote for who you
believe in. And if enough people did this,
you could eventual if you believe your vote
translates, maybe you see some change. But even
if it didn't, if enough people did this,
I think it would expose
how the 2 party system protects the status
quo. I think it's a good thing to
think about. Consider for yourself all the information's
in here. But here's what he wrote. Just
to show you what his breakdown is. As
Sam puts it, most voters don't vote for,
often don't even consider voting for 3rd parties
because they view voting for a third party
as helping the establishment party they hate most.
Guys, that is, like, the core value of
this election right now.
Disenchanted democrats continue to vote for democrats because
they don't want republicans.
Disenchanted republicans continue to vote for republicans because
they don't want democrats. The reason that's become
so central is because everyone's falling out of
this.
So the best thing they got is to
say, but they're worse
more than ever before. Because the reality is
if you recognize again and it's more than
40%, I'm gonna argue that the largest voting
block are people that don't even participate, and
then 40% of those that do are independent,
it shows you that they're inching. They're they're
already gone. And the best they can do
is go, well, crap. If that's all we
have, then I gotta go with the one
that's not as bad. That's wild.
But I'm hoping with this conversation, as we
get closer, people will begin to see that
the very least, that you should vote for
you actually believe in, let alone maybe take
some other action that you think might have
more effect. Maybe both.
But he finishes by saying both are trapped
by fear and loathing.
In today's interview,
I simply added that we'll discuss how this
pack would work, why it will circumvent the
typical typical excuse of helping the other side,
and the overall viability of this potential solution.
I really respect Samuessini, and we don't agree
on everything, but I definitely, you know, his
work in the state department and him calling
them out, they won't even call him anymore.
You know? Anyway, listen to this. I think
it's a good conversation to at least open
this con you know, possibility in your mind.
Now, we've talked a lot about this.
I really believe that we're in the midst
of some intense psychological warfare. And this is
this is the art the show we did
on the 4th August. US Israeli 5th generation
warfare. Israeli bots, destabilizing
propaganda, and digital regime change. We saw Venezuela,
the building. We saw how this is gonna
work. I mean, how this is gonna work
with the election.
It's I mean, this is being already set
up for chaos. Both sides are justifying how
they're not gonna accept it no matter what.
I I think we're engineered into this right
now.
Now I'm hoping that we can see our
way be away from this if we actually
buck the 2 choice lie. But either way,
this is a big part of what's happening,
and it's everywhere. Now one example of this
that I really wouldn't even go to the
level of calling this 5th generation warfare, it's
basically just a very
rudimentary manipulation. But I just wanted to show
you an example of how everywhere this is
right now. I thought this was kind of
hilarious because of how people are framing this.
I guess they just don't run their own
websites. They don't know how this thing How
easy it is to redirect websites to anybody.
But somebody this person, it's American AF,
247,000
followers says, oh my gosh. Holy s h
l I t, Schlit.
Go type this into Google and see what
comes up. And it's it says antifa.com.
And this person goes, what the? And it's
the,
White House
website right here. So check this out.
From one hand. Hold on. Antifa.com.
Okay. So you can see it. Right? Antifa.com.
Hit it.
And it redirects to the White House.
First of all,
it's important to recognize
literally anybody
can redirect to literally any website. I can
set up my website right now, TLab, to
redirect to the White House. It's it's a
it's a one two step process. Very simple.
All you do is type in you go
to your your your back end, you type
in in regard to where you want the
DNS to be pointing, and you redirect it
to point at any website. People do that,
like, for example, we're about to switch coming
up soon. So we're gonna we're gonna redirect
it to a temporary location so you don't
have any downtime.
You won't know the difference. The point is
it's simple. You could redirect it to anything.
So what I think is funny about this
Somebody's saying, what? Read the page?
I'm missing something?
No. I mean, maybe she was talking to
me. I mean, it's dot gov. So this
is this is that's not this is the
White House page. Now, anyway, the point
is that what they're framing it as
is that this is somehow like, wow. Look
at like, I guess the point I'm seeing
people talk about in the chat, in the
comments, like, in the in the in Twitter,
is that, like, this proves that, like, the
White House is antifa or that they're the
Democrats or I mean, it's just it's this
lazy effort, in my opinion, to just make
it about how they are that. And to
me, it's just simple. It's transparent.
You really think that that's them doing that,
then you got caught?
That's just lazy dumb. It doesn't make any
sense. What this is, I think very obviously,
is somebody who just made a website called
antifa.com,
and just redirected to the White House. So
they could go, woah, look. The White House
is Antifa. It's it's simple. And it's how
easy it is to manipulate people.
I think that's ridiculous.
So I think my point is that there
are people out there who are deliberately
lying to you for their truth,
or
just lying to you for whatever reason. But
I do think a huge part of this
is about how people are
manufacturing
what they they believe is the truth, that,
like, that's what they are. So by doing
this, even though it's a lie, it's in
the interest of good.
No. That's that's wrong. That's broken logic. You
are lying
for yourself.
That's what that is. So I just wanna
be cautious about how at the core level
of this, there are people that are being
engineered to justify
anything
as long as your side wins.
And then go back to the idea of
what we're really talking about. The high level,
state level, but also just individuals with with
abilities
to conduct
real psychological warfare
in very, very serious ongoing ways, some of
which are to the level of state level
that are justifying genocide. Now we've talked about
this or manipulating elections. For those that, realize
that every possible candidate, maybe save for Jill
Stein, is blindly pro Israel, there's a reason
for that.
Industrial Complex. The Israeli election interference and psychological
operation industrial complex.
This is an article that this is a
point about a major investigation
showing this guy who you can see, who
was an Israeli asset, proven,
is on the record openly saying that they've
manipulated 27 different presidential elections.
That's what they're doing. And he works for
Israel. How do we not put this together?
And he makes a point to say, this
has happened in the United States.
That is the reality. That's why Russiagate was
Israelgate. And the evidence they found was never
we all saw it. They just didn't really
dive into it. They kept look looking toward
Russia because the whole point is it's not
about
at the end of the day, we're talking
about every government trying to do these things.
But what we can see on the record,
what we can see in every possible dynamic
is that Israel is influencing US policy
to Americans' detriment.
There's not even up for debate.
I'll give you the other articles. Weaponization might
weaponized migration and experimentation,
tools for subversion, division, and manufacturing consent,
and how Israel use the 2 party illusion,
like I'm talking about right now, to divide,
destabilize, and control policy.
It is happening everywhere.
Now, let's get into digital IDs.
There's 2 points we're gonna make. Now, this
this was about the idea I mean, I've
I've been pointing at it throughout this conversation.
The idea that clearly we are being manipulated
into all of it, not just digital IDs.
But that's the starting point, I argue, where
this will go next. But the idea that
they are justifying, rationalizing, as Caitlin's gonna tell
you right now, all of the same things
they were fighting during COVID 19 illusion,
but through different wedge issues that make them
ignore it. Now that's how this government works.
Not the left or the right, but the
government. They do it to all of us,
all the time. In whatever way is most
important, and whatever group seems to be most
resistant that you get focused on, they manipulate
you. That happened during COVID 19 in every
possible way.
So since receptor points this out, I'm gonna
play it first and then I'll looks like
she he mostly quotes what she says, but
I'll read some of it. This is important
because Kath Katherine and I are gonna have
this conversation soon. And she was I mean,
the point is that she's been now based
on what RFK Junior said about Bitcoin, for
example, at the Bitcoin
rally, I it's changed her opinion about all
this. And the idea being that at the
end of the day,
she sees it. She sees the play with
Israel, with the Republicans, with all of this.
And it's not just about one versus the
other. It's about all of them working together
to get you in this position.
Because people will say, well, what do you
think about the election? What do you think
about Biden? And you said they're gonna replace
him. Tell me why They have to they
have to replace him. Why? They they have
no choice. They have to. So
and
and, you
know, and so I think they've
been really struggling to figure out
you know, because there's lots of internal politics
here about who you replace them with and
how that's gonna work.
And
I think they're you know, they they have
to replace him. Because The problem is the
Republicans at this point, and Trump are so
far in the lead. You know? There's nobody
the the only person they can replace him
with is somebody who's gonna lose.
So the question is, who's willing to
do the run, and who's willing to pay
100 of 1,000,000 of dollars, you know, for
a loss? Now right there is important
because what she's saying is that this is
an illusion. Right? This person is gonna step
in knowing that they're going to lose. Now
you could take that as the Trump's just
so popular.
But what she says next, I think, challenges
that.
Wow. You don't think they can cheat their
way in? You think it's that well, my
Martin Armstrong that bad, but here here's the
thing, and and I'm gonna be a bad
guy now.
You know, Trump is promoting a digital ID
and biometrics to deal with the immigration problem.
Do not let the Republicans
trick you into a control grid. Don't. You
know? Very good. Don't, you know, don't get
tricked into cancel the Fed and end up
with the BIS and the IMF.
Don't get tricked into biometrics and a digital
ID to deal with the immigration problem that
the federal government
created and and can absolutely address without all
the things because they're just trick The federal
government created.
She sees this, guys. I mean, I think
it's very obvious.
And if we can't recognize how the like,
I think the problem is that people just
ignore
the implications of what they're doing because they
just don't wanna believe that they would do
that. And that's where you get into the
worship and the ideologue situation. I know people
like that. I remember this during the first
administration. Your an the answer would be, he
wouldn't do that. And I would my jaw
would my jaw would drop. Well, you don't
know this person, for crying out loud. And
how do you possibly know that he wouldn't
do and it turns out they did, and
there wouldn't be an answer for it. It's
like, well, you know, there must have been
a reason. And point is it's blind
acceptance,
blind support.
That's what we're highlighting. No matter who you're
talking about, that's a problem. You into a
control grid. That's not a bad thing, actually.
To say enough. Don't get tricked into biometrics
and a digital ID to deal with the
immigration problem that the federal government
created and and can absolutely address without all
the things because they're just tricking you into
a control grid. That's not a bad thing.
I hate to say it. If if you
look at who Trump put into the cabinet,
you know, he put into the cabinet a
lot of people
who were basically
part of the syndicate that's trying to build
the control grid.
Just like last time.
But I guess he's gonna make the same
mistake
again.
Right? Even giving that a calling it a
mistake is giving him an out. It wasn't
a mistake the first time. You don't put
Bolton and Pompeo and all the rest of
them in those positions and then 1 by
1 become his enemies. The reality is that
if he was naive enough to let that
happen, that should be a provident of himself.
And I I certainly could be that he
blindly thought that the, you know, his own
hubris that he could pick these people and
he would be able to control it. End
of the day, it was the swamp. Those
were those were the worst possible choice. Same
thing's happening right now.
So, you know, before you get enthusiastic
about the Republicans,
you gotta hold their feet to the fire
that they better, you know, they better reverse
the control grid.
That is great. That they reverse the control
grid.
Demand it. Great information. Or just don't let
them build it to begin with. Right? I
hate it. The idea is that they I
think she's well aware these people are going
to vote for these people. End of the
day,
knowing they're gonna vote for them, hold their
feet to the fire. Don't let them do
that. But problem is
when they do,
it comes along with a justifying narrative.
Well, this needs to be done to stop
them. And we promise we won't do x,
y, and z. And they'll go on with
it because they always do. The point is,
for those of us that aren't lost in
this, but maybe still aligned with 1 part
or the other, push back
with everything you have for all that matters.
This is what's important.
Actually, I'll just go past this for time,
but I wanna get I wanna I think
I, honestly, I think I'm gonna finish up
with the digital ID point, then we're gonna
I'm gonna I'm gonna make a a promise
to do to I I'm feeling like my
arm is not that bad right now. It's
still a little achy because of what Really,
it's it's the time
of the setup that kills me. That all
the computer work. Right now, it's I'm just
just resting in the sling. So I think
the tomorrow, my point is I'm gonna do
a show. I'm gonna I'm gonna hold to
that. I have most of this already lined
up. I'm gonna make that happen. My I
was I was kinda thinking I was gonna
let it rest this you know? But I
I wanna make sure we get this out
tomorrow. And it's about the mosquito discussion I
was gonna get into, but also monkeypox and
digital health and all that. So get ready
for tomorrow. We're gonna make it happen.
So
this
is a great clip that doctor Ray put
out,
as well as this one down here that's,
gotta just show it's kind of it's an
excerpt from their discussion, which I was not
this this is the important part. He says,
we will accidentally walk into a digital ID
system.
Here's a clip that overlaps what he said
as well as with what Whitney's been saying
in different locations.
Gonna close the border, and we're gonna get
the crooked ones out, the bad ones out,
and we're gonna let a lot of people
come in because we need more people, especially
with AI coming and all of the different
things and the farmers need, everybody needs. But
we're gonna make sure that they're not murderers,
killers, drug dealers, and the kind of people
that we have largely coming in right now.
Of course, the migration situation
is being allowed to happen this way. The
smart wall has consistently been a been a
bipartisan project. So you have the Democrats creating
the conditions to manufacture consent, and it's the
2 party illusion. It's it's the left hand
and the right hand
the left hand is creating the problem and
the right hand is gonna come in and
ride into the rescue to solve the problem.
The left hand has created or vice versa
Every time. And it's the exact same system
both hands want.
Right. And the win only winner here is,
the people that wanna create this global technocratic
government system
that relies on AI mass surveillance to run
and control our freedom of movement. It's being
sold as this liberty driven thing that we're
going to make America great again and stop,
illegal immigration and and whatnot. But that's not
what's going to happen here. We're essentially being
herded into what I would argue is sort
of a technocratic nightmare.
The cornerstone of which is this digital ID
agenda, which is, meant to be linked to
some sort of digital wallet that contains programmable
surveyable money, either a CBDC issued by a
central bank or issued by a private bank.
And,
I think ultimately
That's her point about the whole Jamie Dimon
overlap,
right, and Jamie Morgan, and the idea that
we're like, Well, if we resist CBDCs, then
go with the private version. Right? Which is
it's the same thing, guys. And that's what's
happening everywhere. Right? She makes her point with
with the the past about total information awareness
and life log that became Palantir. It's a
privatized aspect. And that's teal for it. The
it's all it shows you how this typically
works. Now with the public private partnership kinda
direction, the
not just the usual such suspects but, like,
the main suspects in this conversation that are
driving all of this are the ones that
are backing what's going on with Trump. And
then you can add in at Maryam Adelson
for good measure or terrible measure. The idea
that all the worst problems that we can
see are all backing what's going on here.
But, you know, have the bad guys on
the inside or whatever Kyu would convince you
of. What people need to do is not
focus so much on these political saviors being
put out in front of us, but focus
on what we're going to do to not
comply,
with the digital ID agenda and these other
things that they need in order to push
us into this world that they've been building.
Right. And I I would really appreciate it
if people would focus on that again because
I think there was a lot of consciousness
generated around that, during COVID, for example, where
people rightly, in my opinion,
pointed out that vaccine passports are really sort
of a trial run for a lot of
this broader digital ID stuff.
But, you know, the digital ID stuff is
marching, full speed ahead. And now in the
United States, a lot of the people that
were critical of it is vaccine passports,
are are
essentially,
calling for it. I mean, you have people
like Trump on the campaign trail saying the
US desperately needs a biometric,
entry exit system.
Biometric
entry exit visa tracking system, which we need
desperately.
Isn't that wild?
If they come out and said we need
that to track because of COVID, everyone would
lose their minds. But it what's the the
4 x, y, and z is sort of
irrelevant. You give them a system set up
to monitor you for some kind of justification,
it will be used.
Obviously.
Same point right there. The port supporters of
him would be like, he wouldn't do that.
Well, even if you're right, wait till 4
years.
I mean, we can't be this simple. We
have to realize he's not on your side.
But the point, even if you think it's
eventually gonna end up in the pans of
people that will abuse you.
We cannot allow this to be rolled into
the very thing that we all tell you
is coming. Even if you end up going,
but Trump didn't do it. I don't care
at the end of the day. It's happening.
We we're watching it. And if you think
voting in Trump who wants to do part
of what they want to is gonna change
that, I just don't know I don't know
how to convince you otherwise when he's literally
saying it out loud.
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will be
on land.
It will be on sea. It will be
in air. We will have a proper tracking
system.
Yay.
They all cheer for that. My
god.
And, you have this campaign while you're going
on podcast saying we need to be scan
our face and our eyeballs in order to
be able to vote in the United States.
You know? My point is imagine it was
exactly the same narrative for exactly the same
reason it was Biden saying it.
I mean, you should laugh about that. Because
you know, as I do, they would be
like, no.
You're a bad guy. You're a bad whatever.
It would be everything
the right reasons to resist it. But not
when Trump does it because, you know, he's
the good guy.
If we need voter ID, why can't we
just use a physical ID?
Right. Or something like that. Why does it
have to be biometric
and digital? And then you see that, you
know, the the Trump campaign just like the
party, are beholden to these Silicon Valley donors.
A good example of that would be Trump's
recent,
VP pick, JD Vance,
who was, intimately tied up with Peter Thiel,
who created
a CIA funded
data mining companies that are surveilling Americans and
profiling them for intelligence based on our online
activity and are very much invested in these
digital ID agendas and digital wallet agendas,
and and these programmable,
surveillable,
currencies.
And, again, I think we need to focus
more on what we can do as people
and as communities and not think that we
can just sit back in our armchair and
just vote, you know, once a Imagine calling
that black pill.
Listen to what you just said. And this
is the point, more than anybody, she's calling
being called black pilled because she has so
much information that she's relaying that is impossible
to ignore. Some people hear it and it's
so overwhelming to them. Like, look at some
of these past interviews with Jimmy and the
rest of them. They almost just go blank.
They don't even know what to say. It's
so much that you go, well, it's like,
oh, we're screwed. Well, that's what you say
in response, whoever's saying that. A lot of
the times that's what they go, oh my
god, we're screwed. That's not what she's saying.
That's not what I'm saying. We're saying we
need to do more than pretend that you
checked that box that you're gonna change it.
We are the only entities, not just us
in TLAB or her, but, like, the people
doing this. There's there's a lot of us,
but I think it's the minority, but we're
the only ones that are actually going, we
need to stop that. We need to do
something to stop this from happening. That's change.
Black people don't say we're screwed. We're giving
up. Again, listen to what she just said.
And, again, I think we need to focus
more on what we can do as people
and as communities and not think that we
can just sit back in our armchair
and just vote, you know, once every 4
years or once every, you know, x number
of years between election cycles and and everything's
gonna be magically better. I think people need
to take
responsibility
and and think about what we can do
as people to opt out of these systems
that they're trying to impose on us. Oh,
man. She's given up. Right?
Trust me, guys. There's a reason that I'm
stressing this because it is I it's everywhere
in this conversation right now. And there's a
very weirdly coordinated effort to frame people like
what we're saying as as, you know, not
just like coordinated chills working for something, but
the idea that we've just given up on
it. But yet somehow coordinated the work for
something else. For it's at the end of
the
day, obviously, that's not what she's saying.
As people, we need to find what we
can do to change this, not just pretend
like voting in this broken lie is gonna
do so. Like, acknowledge the possibility that it's
obviously could be that the the voting system
or the election in general is completely broken.
Like, obviously, we can acknowledge it's a possibility.
I frankly think it's easy to prove, but
it's not impossible.
Right? So this weird idea that by highlighting
the fact that it's a broken system and
that you have,
you know, the illusion of choice
as an obvious possibility is somehow being black
filled into the it's simply trying to show
people that we are trapped
and that what we want is a real
solution. And we give we have all sorts
of discussions about what else to do.
Like I said, Derek Rose more than anybody
is is most of what he does is
rooted in how we can actually
have positive change outside of some broken voting
system.
My myself, Eileen, and you I I highlight
more of the current ongoing situation. That's just
what I do in any context. But I
also have lots of conversations I've had many
times about what else we can do. One
of them I always point out is the
abstention point or the idea that I honestly
believe that there's a lot of other actions
that are more politically
active or affecting change than the even if
you think voting is translating,
than simply vote checking a box and acting
like that's all you need to do. Whether
you think it's protesting or going out and
or doing a show like this or you're
doing, you know,
like, think tank conversations, having meetings with people
and discussing these things. And and these things
are actually influencing people's opinions.
And on top of that, the ideas I've
said before, and a real representative government, which
these things could work toward creating again,
voting is paramount.
So none of us are saying anything different
than that. And that's what's so important to
recognize is there's a very clear effort to
convince you otherwise.
Now
this is circulating right now.
But it's
true. Biden administration, Russia's digital ID plans. Now
it hasn't necessarily happened yet, but I obviously
think it will and is, whoever's in power.
I think that's the obvious point. But right
now, the the it's kinda being built that
it's the Biden administration and that's how the
even though right at the same time we're
talking about this, we've already shown you,
largely republican driven is the say the SAVE
Act, which is real ID compliant identification with
a few other options in there. We'll come
back to that.
So the point
here. Oops. Wrong one. Okay. So the Biden
administration rushes digital ID plans. So the and
my point is simply that they're driving this
forward, but it's predominantly around at the start
anyway, the
was it ML or DL?
Maybe the actual one. The the digital driver's
license. That's that's primarily what this is be
focusing on to start anyway. Biden administration's working
to expedite widespread adoption of digital IDs,
including driver's license, the draft executive order indicates.
Hasn't happened to draft. Right? But it still
seems to be on the way, which I'm
nobody should deny. It's obvious. Here's NIST coming
out on the 21st,
saying they released their second public draft of
I digital identity guidelines for final review. This
is no joke, guys. Obviously, this is happening.
There's no question. Weirdly enough,
they're seeking public comments in the draft through
October 7, 2024.
My point is that they're all pushing this.
I don't think they care what you have
to say about it. It's all just the
illusion of some kind of process.
August 21st, same thing. And this is just
the guidelines they put out if you wanna
read more into it. But it's very clear
what this is is over about.
Here is Federal News Network saying NIST opened
the aperture,
opens the opening on digital identity with latest
draft guidelines.
National Institute For Standards and Technology is trying
to give agencies the and the public more
options when it comes to digital identity and
anti fraud capabilities.
White House pose poised to throw federal support
behind
MDLs, mobile driver's license. Now the point is
this is step 1. Well, you know, one
of the early steps in in this process
in regard to getting you into digital ID,
digital everything. Right? So my point in showing
you this before going back to the SAVE
ID act, because remember, the SAVE act
is the point we made
is if you look, watch the show. It's
undeniable. In the documentation, it explicitly says Real
ID compliant as one of the choices.
That is digital ID.
ID Real ID and ID 2020 were on
the surface, a digital ID push.
Now the point is that
one of those was Real ID compliant, then
they said some other things, birth certificate and
whatever else. So the argument was, well, look,
there's other choices. Okay. Fair enough. I made
the point then that those are the choices
where a very
slim my minority of people that were out
there. But my point also,
with that first point being that they're gonna
drive most people into it right away anyway.
But my point is, on top of that,
is
this is being put out,
and then,
in a year, a month,
something changes, which invalidates those other choices. Which
is almost always what happens. Okay. That's what
this would be. So suddenly they drive this
forward. Suddenly now the you have a m
mobile driver's license. But more than that, you
have a mobile identification storing device.
Or on your device.
That's what this will be. Read about it.
For all of your social security card, your
drive okay. So then you happen to position
where they go, okay. Well, we no longer
take the physical versions of these things. You
that's what they're telling they're gonna eventually go
to. So what happens when you get to
the point in the very near future, hopefully
we can stop it, where they go, okay.
Well, we no longer accept the physical versions.
What that means is on the real
save ID or the actually, I realized the
save act,
then suddenly, the other choices you pointed at,
the alternatives are no longer there. Even though
it's listed in there, it's not gonna be
amended to go, but now all we have
are these digital versions. So my point is
it's obvious.
This is a Trojan horse. Using the 2
party illusion and the election to usher in
digital IDs. This is based on immigration and
the border. We just showed you they're all
talking about the biometric discussion. That's what they're
doing.
So it's it's a very easy move to
say, now you have to use Real ID
compliant because that's all that's left.
Suddenly, it's the law.
Guys, this is Republican's side of it. This
is from Biden's side of it. They're all
working together,
your government, to drive you into what they
need to control you. I just don't know
how I can make that any more clear.
Now Derek has written a lot for T
Lab about the digital ID. This one is
exposing the digital ID as a human rights
scam.
This one's important as the NYU School of
Law literally came out and said that digital
IDs in general are, quote, paving a digital
road to hell. Direct quote from NYU School
of Law. It's it's like everything else, like
5 g or whatever else. Like, everyone the
people that are knowledgeable in the field
are going dangerous. They don't know. Or GMOs,
for example.
Plenty of intelligent people in the field are
going, these are gonna hurt you. There's cancer
problems. And they go, no. You're crazy.
Happened anyway.
Whatever happened with that, by the way? What
a resounding success that oh, wait. Never mind.
It failed and hurt a lot of people,
but let's let them do it with injections.
Same old dumb thing. We just cycle through
these games because they use the partisan conversation
to keep you lost and divided and confused
and really
settling
for what's not as bad as the other.
That's not just candidates, guys. That's how this
game works.
And I'm hoping that this might have reached
a few more people.
So I'm gonna end today with this clip
Of
I'm not sure who this is. James Melville
shared this. But really, I keep seeing a
lot of these videos where I'm liking the
fact that I'm seeing a lot of younger
people
who are just having these kind of that
that's what we just call the come to
Jesus moment. Right? Or come to Jesus meeting
where it's like, you just are like, okay.
We we need to, you
know, be a reconcile us. We need to
acknowledge where we the reality of what's going
on. And you have a lot of these
people that are coming these moments with, like,
wow.
I'm seeing this.
It's not one thing or the other. It's
the whole damn thing.
I think we should I mean, it's important
that I think we we lean into that.
And the problem is right now is even
comments that people are like, oh, what a
lefty or everyone that that is the go
to
manipulation, I would call it, to get people
to ignore truth.
Don't listen to that truth. She's a democrat.
Don't listen to what he said. He's a
republican.
It's true. If it's if you it's true,
or at the very least, whether it is
or not, you should listen to it
so you can decide.
So thank you for tuning in, guys. As
I said, I'm gonna be doing something tomorrow,
and I'm gonna make sure we talk about
the the one part I was gonna get
into next,
the GM mosquito overlap. There's a point that's
happening with Boston that I think is very
relevant with the, you know,
potential lockdowns that already curfew seem to be
happening. I'm gonna try to do it early
as I can tomorrow. But it's important to
see that I think that this as you've
seen us talk about before, the undeniable overlap
of the with the tetracycline
aspect of the GM mosquitoes or the spraying
for pesticides that also have an effect on
that same conversation or the dumping of edible
vaccines for animals in the wild, which happens
all over the place, which also have a
tetracycline overlap. The point is it makes these
GM mosquitoes
stronger.
This is peer reviewed science.
Now, point in that is those things then
cause things that I think are being used.
And I think it's a manufactured problem, quite
frankly, or experiment. The point is I wanna
make sure we talk about this before it
explodes into something more that ends up being
used for the whole medical freedom conversation or,
you know, making calling it another COVID strain,
whatever happens, as well as the conversation of
monkeypox and and just that general overlap and
probably some other stories that pop up tomorrow.
So thank you for tuning in today. I
appreciate your patience especially with with, you know,
everything.
I just all the stuff we're dealing with
that takes my time away from this. But
you know we care about this. You know
that I care personally about you and what
you're doing and the people out there. I
mean, that's that's I mean, you know, you
know, I I shouldn't say that. You don't
know what I feel internally, but that's the
truth coming from me, is that it matters
to me. It matters to me that people
are being lied to. It matters to me
that individuals are being manipulated to act against
their own interests. It matters to me that
there are children literally starving to death as
I speak.
And in that pause, another child was killed
by Israel. That's literally reality of what's going
on. That's not a joke. Right now, as
we're talking, there are people being killed with
your tax dollars. These things have to matter
to us. And I think it's important to
drive these into the larger conversation. But I'm
I'm thank you for being here and and
helping. But I see as an important effort
of, you know,
of around or outside of the the political
game that's being played. That's where we all
need to get to. Truly
acting in what we, you know, believe in,
what we think are the best interest for
everybody,
not just and I do and look, I
will argue there are people within that law
the the problem
that in many cases do think that's what's
happening. My point is that it always comes
up against, if you walk through it,
something that they compromise.
Whether it's the other person, the other side,
the idea that he'd said this, but he
meant that. Well, it's probably the good just
ignoring things to drive in what you want
to be the reality despite history showing you
that that has never seemingly been the case.
We, as individuals, are what we need to
lean into.
Right? Lean into what you believe in, your
community.
The actions and votes that actually make a
difference, like voting with your dollar. Acting with
kindness in your community that then spreads like
wildfire. Being the person that you want people
to emulate. That's what we need to fight
for. That's what I hope this community is
doing, and I believe it is. So thank
you for being the person that you are
in helping show other people that it's possible.
Thank you for being you. I love you
all. As always, question everything. Come to your
own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
We eat the food they give us, vote
for 1 of 2 people that they tell
us to, and watch the movies that they
show. They take our attention as soon as
we reach age 5, and they never give
it back. We go to school for 8
hours a day learning what they want us
to. They scold us until we obey and
then they praise us when we do. They
make us form a habit of waking up
and spending our entire day in a building
that we wouldn't choose, so that when we
get older, we are willing to do the
same. Following orders becomes comfortable when we spend
our childhood doing what we're told. So when
we're older, we hesitate to stray outside the
norm. They tell us that we should do
anything we can to attend a university because
if we don't, we will fail. They manipulate
us into financial dependency at a young age
so that we stay liable to the system.
They've given us a currency that only has
value because they say it does, and we
receive it by working at a business that
they own. Their 1,000,000 become 1,000,000,000 while the
rest of us are forced to sacrifice our
time for a minuscule fraction of what our
work gains for them. They provide us housing,
but make it costly so that we struggle
to accumulate enough wealth to escape their system.
Our supermarkets are full of brands that they
possess to the point that it is difficult
to find ones that they don't. Our meals
are either purchased from a store that they
most likely own or created with ingredients from
their brands.
They tamper with the food they give us
and pump them with toxic and addictive chemicals.
They make the most harmful foods, the cheapest,
and most convenient so that it becomes an
offer that we can't refuse.
Over time, we become addicted in many more
ways than 1, and they bombard us with
temptation on every billboard or commercial. When we
get sick from excessive consumption of this insubstantial
food, we are forced with almost no other
option but to give up financial solidity for
the sake of our health. We pay 1,000
to facilities that they own so that they
can prescribe us more harmful chemicals that simply
numb the symptoms.
They revolve society around addictive foods that cause
disease and expensive drugs that mask them so
that we stay in a forever grasp of
their system. We only ever consume content that
they provide. Our news channels are operated by
them to persuade us into 2 opposing perspectives
so that we never share a same opinion.
Why do you think it's free? They feed
us shocking news headlines that provoke emotion and
grab our attention away from what's really going
on in the world. They've granted us with
superficial idols that portray luxurious lifestyles so that
we strive to be like them and associate
money with happiness.
They keep us focused on worldly problems that
they've created to keep us zoomed in on
our physical reality and detached from our creator.
If we keep our attention on what's going
on around us, we will never be present
and see the truth of God within us.
The villain who runs the world knows the
truth of our potential and is in their
best interest to keep us distracted and willing
to submit to a system that thrives on
fearful compliance.
Imagine if every person on this planet believed
that we were created for a reason. We
would unlock an unbreakable faith within ourselves and
reverse the pyramid of power in which society
was built. We would see past the lie
that we've been living and turn to each
other for help rather than depending on our
corrupt leaders.
Corrupt leaders who have accumulated a discreet monopoly
that succeeds and circumvent to the eyes of
those who are unaware through the illusion of
choice. The majority of us see the world
as is as it is portrayed,
diverse, coincidental, and plausible. To someone who lives
day by day without taking a step back,
the world kind of seems to make sense.
Then we look behind the curtain and see
that it really makes sense. Where there is
one lie, there is many. Once we see
one lie, we will find ourselves on an
endless spiderweb of mass deception. The blindfold tied
around us in childhood will loosen and light
will be shed on our fabricated reality. Those
in charge of us do not have our
best interest in mind and never did. It
has been a power trip from the start,
and we have gone along with it since
the birth of society and will continue to
until we see a reason for change and
stop pointing fingers at each each
other.