Is a political philosophy,
which has brought about the state of Israel,
the so called state of Israel. This this
political philosophy has nothing to do with religion.
On the contrary, it seeks to confuse others
and let them think that Zionism and Judaism
is 1 and the same. I am a
conscious African.
I know properly my history. I know that
Africa gave Judaism to the world. I know
that the first Jews in the world were
Africans. Not only do I know this, but
I inform everyone who has doubts about it
to read a book by Sigmund Freud, entitled
Moses and Monotheism as a beginning. Consequently, I
know that Judaism and Zionism are not the
same. Zionism had his first organizational expressions in
18/97
in Bauhaus, Switzerland, in Europe.
Here was a man by the name of
Theodor Herzl, h e r z l. He
was the founder of Zionism.
He said that he was going to find
the state that God promised the Jews. Listen
to this very carefully. This man, Herzl, was
an atheist. He had believed that there was
no God. He said God did not exist.
Now how is it the man who do
believes that God does not exist is going
to find a state that God promised to
his chosen people? I'm telling you, this man
is Satan in disguise. Zionism is a satanic
movement. It is devil. It is imperialism. It
is racist. It has gone and taken the
lands of the Palestinian people and through terrorism
has driven them out and through terrorism, it
maintains its power. And the United States of
America with over 6,000,000 homeless sends to the
Israel. 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000
of dollars everywhere to bomb Palestinian people while
homeless people are here and unemployed are here.
Zionism is going to raise this war and
make the people in America become clear to
what it is and become anti Zionist and
stop the aid to Israel and use the
money to take care of the homeless in
this country.
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Friday, August 23,
2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Well, RFK Junior has officially thrown in with
Donald Trump.
And I kinda, like, wanna feel like I
wanna say I told you so, but there's
a lot of people out there that are
talking about this in interesting ways. I was
on multiple radio shows this morning talking about
my thoughts around this.
I just I have a lot to say
about it. So we're gonna talk about the
interesting dynamic
of the 2 party illusion of the clear
Zionists,
I guess,
the the influence behind both driving sides of
that paradigm right now. We're gonna talk about,
you know, really in a the latter half
of the show is gonna be catching up
on a lot of things going on in
the ongoing genocide. And we're gonna start with
that conversation and how that bleeds into allowing
what's going on, but also what this means
for the future of this country, the election
coming up, whatever you think about what that
election is and what it represents.
But I find it really interesting to see
how this is playing out. And the the
the thumbnail
really kinda nails it. I I briefly pointed
out in a different show because I saw
it from somebody else's post discussing this on
a previous conversation. I said I'm gonna use
that for another show. It's it's just exactly
what we're dealing with right now. And now
whether you look at that as RFK as
the focal point of the title
or Trump, but seeing as how they're now
going together or at least endorsing, I I'm
still of the mind that I RFK is
gonna find his way into a position with
the Trump administration, which is a pretty public
conversation at least, or Kamala Harris or Biden
or anybody else, say for the, I guess,
perceived as not part of the possible, you
know, the Jill Steins of the world. Obviously,
we're basically in a position where whatever you're
voting for and this is the basic premise
of today, whether it's about Zionism or just
our poll political system and the the falsity
of the 2 party illusion, that whatever you're
voting for, whatever you think and again, this
is not even getting into whether your vote
translates to the outcome, but the perception being
that the if you're whoever you believe you're
voting for.
If at the end of the day,
it all seems to end up in the
same direction, which a lot of us have
been saying for all for many election cycles.
What's the ultimate
outcome here? Well, what's the what's the what
those are the purpose?
And it's not to say that there's not
a purpose for voting. Believe me. I understand
the importance in a genuine representative
government, democracy, whatever you wanna call it. I
don't believe that's where we are, but that's
not necessarily the point for today. It's if
we can recognize that let's just take the
2 people being pushed in front of you,
that
it's you've decided it's a lesser of 2
evils or however you wanna perceive this. And
by the way, before I forget, I'm jumping
in the middle of my point. I had
a great interview with Sam Husseini,
day before yesterday
about his
vote packed,
option, essentially, a different choice that we could
be making. And you know my opinion about
voting in general, but I found this to
be really interesting even in the context of
voting not, at least in this current context,
translating to the outcome about how this could
expose that. My point though is that brought
to mind the idea of the lesser of
2 evil. So if we're in a position
where we're seeing,
you know, well, they're both pretty bad, but,
clearly, I can't let Trump win because that
would be the end of the world, so
I've gotta lean in with Kamala or vice
versa. Oh my god. We can't let Kamala
all you know, whatever the different kind of
baggage that comes along with them. So I
guess I gotta vote for Trump. This the
reluctance of either side falling in with the
usual. Or with our case point, which we're
gonna get into, the idea that we can
argue that somehow every time we get these
kind of rolling momentum of the independent, which
I'm telling you is the untapped reality, which
they all know they all know that's the
largest voting block, and they're they're using these,
in my opinion, these different manipulations to draw
people back into that same system just like
we're seeing now. Or, like, with Bernie Sanders
and Hillary Clinton, it's not really that different
than everything else, but we're we we get
all motivated about something being different, and we're
gonna challenge the system, and then they fall
right into line. Now whatever you think about
that, even if you think that is just
a logical choice based on how the system
works,
we cannot keep playing this game like this.
We cannot keep pretending, like, falling into line
with the system we all know is screwed.
That's why we went in this direction to
begin with. Just has to be the choice
for this let this one because, well, if
we don't do it now, then we won't
have the next set it's all just one
excuse after another. And every single time we
fall back into line, and I'm speaking we
as generally, I'm not partaking ever. I don't
I don't play this game. My own position
is that the only way to not lose
a rigged game is to not play. That's
not to say that voting is not
a a good or effective or
that voting has no effect.
I know that it does. My point is
that in a system that is rigged,
what does the it it's it's only that's
so that ultimately ends up being only for
you. The the conversation in my mind is
what I have with everybody when we talk
about this, which is ultimately that we all
seem to address that this doesn't work. Or
or that's broken. Or that they steal. Or
they cheated. Or they work with a foreign
governor. Whatever the feeling is, we all generally
see in multiple ways this doesn't work. And
we all act we acknowledge that throughout the
years. And then when it comes back to
this point every time,
people go, okay. Well, what else we gonna
do? And and I get it. I get
that the and I there's plenty of other
things if you listen to people like Derrick
Rose that I personally find voting to be
the least politically effective thing that we have,
the least politically effective tool with the current
dynamic. There's a lot of other things we
do that are far more politically advantageous or
effective.
But the point is that even if we
didn't have another option, is the actual solution
in that moment to just go through the
motions?
I just don't understand how any problem solving
logic, any other problem in the world, that
would make sense. Well, I guess we just
gotta vote for these 2 murdering war criminals
because that's the best system we've got. Well,
the whole point is if if we can't
stop and go time out, there's a problem
here.
This doesn't work, or we're being lied to,
to just simply fall right back into that
is you giving credence to that problem. And
I argue, manufactured this way. So the first
thing, as always, to solving a problem is
acknowledging that we have a problem.
And even if you're kind of going, yeah.
I kind of see it, but that doesn't
make any sense because if I do 3rd
party or this, we're gonna give it to
the other side. That is still allowing the
problem. Like, we'll get into this. I'll I'll
I'll break it short there because I can
go off on this forever with RFK Junior's
point
that we have to recognize that if we're
gonna every time fall into the system as
opposed to taking it on the chin, let's
say, and losing or losing momentum or but
to establish, let's say, what they could have
done, you know, the 5%, starting a new
party, getting funding to do some to get
that to keep that momentum going until the
next election.
If we can't make that choice
and see that as the, well, we'll give
in here for the later win as opposed
to giving in to the failure of the
system for the immediate win, if you wanna
see it that way, if we can't get
past how obviously detrimental that is to everything
even then you think you're fighting for, I
I posit that you don't want to see
the possible difference. That you, in some way,
enjoy the back and forth, the 2 party
game, the team sport politics. And I just
want you to reflect on that because we
can see that this doesn't change anything.
It just doesn't. And we all know that.
I mean, this this is one of the
most common conversations. This is why I'm getting
invited to talk on different shows because most
people don't make these points or talk about
potential that will you know, selections and how
this doesn't even
even remotely end up the way we think
it does. But ultimately,
we're gonna talk about that to start in
a lot of different directions. About Trump, about
Kamala, about the left, about the right, about
Zionism,
and show you how obvious this is in
my opinion. Then we're gonna finish talking about
the genocide. And one of the things that
I made a tweet about that it got
a lot of a lot of good attention
that I wanted just I I just decided
screw it. We're just gonna play them in
succession on the show, which
was a powerful realization of how many doctors
have spoken up.
How many doctors have from all over the
world,
multiple countries.
And and only I mean, there's plenty of
Palestinian doctors that have been speaking up, but,
of course, that's the easy thing for people
to dismiss if they want to decide Palestinians
are the bad guys except otherwise pretend you're
only fighting Hamas.
There are doctors from places all around the
world that have spoken up and even gone
back and come back again and spoken up
again about not just the fact that this
is genocide, but that they are watching children
come in with multiple bullet holes to the
head.
Sniper shots to children that are not around
other buildings. They're just out in the open.
Multiple bodies shredded, bodies destroyed, doctors,
you know, with decades under their belt breaking
down in tears because of what they've seen
after coming from other war zones. I mean,
it's it's just unbelievable that we can, for
one more second, allow what's happening over there
to continue under some political excuse, under some
discussion about terrorism or who's what side needs
to have a better protection against the future
events. It's about right this moment as I'm
speaking, your governments are starving children. As I'm
talking right now, they're bombing innocent people. As
we're having this conversation, there are people starving
to death because all of your governments are
allowing that to continue. That's the conversation.
And quite frankly, as I keep saying, this
is the conversation of our time in a
lot of different ways. Whether it's
the most disgusting, obvious, in your face, gaslit
genocide I've ever seen, or just the simple
reality of how the leading structure behind that
is influencing your election. This is the conversation.
Now last thing I'll say to start,
I know a lot of people out there
would argue that let even during COVID as
I was before, they argue I'm over focusing
on the topic. And I said this to
begin. I said, you know, this is obviously
paramount, and clearly, I've been
shown to be right about that. Look at
how much this has overtaken. Look at the
conversation of the world around this because I
see it too, and I agree.
My point in bringing this up is that
this, in my opinion, is one of the
largest things I'll probably ever cover my entire
career. But on top of that,
I believe that this is worthy of conversation.
Every time I come to the show to
to begin kind of breaking down what I'm
gonna talk about that day, I think about
these things. I think about the comments you
send. I think about what people say. You
know? I got you know? Am I choosing
to focus on this for something other than
what I think is most important?
And and I've I've come to the conclusion,
no. This is monumental. But then I stand
back and go, okay. But even if it's
most important, am I missing the forest for
the trees? Am I looking too much here
and missing other big stories?
Certainly possible. Which is why I constantly look
to what you guys are sending, what you're
tagging me in, what I can find on
other platforms, left, right, middle,
aware of the illusion,
and I do my best to try to
put together what I think is the most
important. And there are things that I do
see building that I haven't talked about, but
I just keep making the decision that this
is
something that is the most important thing to
what I think you need to know about
for what's going on right now in your
life. Now, that may not seem always the
case, but if you end up watching what
we're talking about and seeing the connections of
what I'm making, I think it's immediate to
what affects your life and the real not
not the wedge issues of the day that
you feel like you care about more and
maybe is more important to you. And, you
know, and and, still, maybe I'm wrong. But
I think what what I'm talking about is
ultimately the the topics that I think,
if we're able to change, if we're able
to come around to seeing
mass adoption or or a mass awareness, that
we can have real change in our lives.
Genuine shift into something positive, not to pretend
to party back and forth, but actual change.
And that's what I'm fighting for. And I
want you guys to hear that from me,
is that I can I know there are
people in this audience that think like, I
mean, I just looked through the last so
many shows,
not even just a focus on Israel, but
a very specific focus, at least in the
title, in regard to the larger agenda across
both parties, the Zionist manipulation across the globe,
and how it's a manufactured sort of, as
I put in the other case, the industrial
complex?
And it's and I'm seeing it. It's it's
it's multiple. And I get that that seems
to be very focused, and it is focused.
But I wanted to make sure you guys
hear on the fact that I reflect on
it every day, and I do my best
to try to find what I think is
going to be the most monumental important news
for you.
So
let reach out to me if you think
that I'm missing something, if I am indeed
missing the forest for the trees. But you
guys come to here come to me because
I think you believe that I will fight
for what I think is the most important
regardless of all the noise. And I think
we've been proven correct in doing so even
in cases where
some half the audience is telling us that
we're fixating too long, and then it turns
out to clearly, historically, be the right focal
point, like with COVID 19. Anyway, I wanted
to make sure that was clear. And I
know most of you here listening, you don't
need to hear this, but it's important because
I think it's important. You should be questioning
me and what I think and what's going
on. That's important. Now lastly, I'm gonna have
an, we Whitney and I just talked about,
our upcoming
we wanted to do the election special conversation
like we did last year. So we recently
just we we're looking around,
beginning of October, I think, was the point
we just decided. So we're probably gonna be
doing that. Upcoming, maybe 1 or maybe 2
shows around this. But somewhere like last year,
just predictions talking about this stuff so you
can look forward to that. We just spoke
today about that. And Catherine Austin Fitz and
I just spoke about setting up a conversation
around exactly what I just opened with. More
so specifically around the the kind of wake
you know, waking up from the trance as
we're talking about it. Of the 2 party
illusion, of all that we're talking about, of
Israel, like, I think it'll be important conversation.
So looking forward to that. So long opening
there, guys. I apologize for that, but
felt it was important to get those thoughts
out. So let's start today with a point
about
health
as Derek was covering this recent as for
I mean, long before even even being covered
on TLav. But this is an important point
to go into a lot of other things.
And if we do have time, we'll see
if we get there. I was gonna end
up talking about some medical stuff at the
end. But you need to see this either
way, whether we get to that today or
to the next show.
Derek has been talking about the fluoride conversation
for a long time. And if you've been
watching this show, you know damn well, or
TLAF in general, that this is a very
real problem that they've known about.
That's the important part. That this is something,
as the title from the article we just
put out, long delayed US government report finally
released.
And as we've been telling you, despite the
hiding of this from your government or the
the obfuscation and the lies and the and
the movie that they've concluded
or rather the report concludes and they grudgingly
showed you this, that fluoride lowers IQ in
children. Now for most people out there who
are not blinded by partisanship or blinded by
their adherence to some kind of an authority,
you already know this because it's been around
for a very long time. Like, you probably
also know that overuse of antibiotics are causing
superbugs, and you also know that PFAS is
everywhere and glyphosate's all over your body. You
know all these things despite the lies around
them that still bury all the conversation, or
spraying in the skies, or all these things
they still in many circles pretend are fake
despite them admitting them or having studies around
them or using them for their own purposes
or stopping climate change. But otherwise, they're fake
and you're crazy.
They those things exist at the same time,
and it's baffling to me in in the
real sense of the word. But this is
important because what this shows you, not just
around fluoride, but around every other thing we
talk about, whether it is health related or
not, your government
acts like it's there to protect you, while
what it's doing, in this case, more than
ever, is fighting to keep the thing that
they already know is dangerous in your water.
Or at the very least, fighting to keep
it from your view, which then in effect
keeps it in your water, knowing it's hurting
you. I just don't know why this one
thing does not shake the shake shift the
conversation.
I mean, I do know why, but I'm
trying to hope when I say things like
that, I'm hoping to trigger the thought process
of other people.
Your government doesn't care about you. Not the
left, not the right. Your government is clear,
because this has gone on from administration to
administration
for years. And the point to make is
that fluoride is a toxin. That's the point.
It's a neurotoxin.
And they know that. In fact, the reality
goes back to where this came from. It
was a byproduct.
As Derek has covered in his articles,
if they hadn't found the
important way to help you in your water,
I'm being facetious,
they would have had to pay the companies
with this byproduct to dispose of this dangerous
chemical. Instead,
you pay to have it put in your
water.
So not only are they benefiting from whatever
they're doing and this is the byproduct, they're
now then they're doubling up and making more
money on this, and then your government makes
money in the process of putting dangerous things
in your water. And it lowers your IQ.
Not just children, be clear. It's it's in
general neurotoxic, but this is the most obvious
problem.
But he and so, I I think Derek
recently up to added another quote in there
from Michael Conant of the freedom,
Florida Action Network, make sure you follow them,
they're the ones making sure this happens. Good
on them for following through with all this.
But then ultimately, judge Chen
has to, make a ruling on this. So
it very well still could just be put
to bed. He could rule that this isn't
enough information. They've already watered it down with
the the conversation about whether there's enough in
certain context. The point is there's fluoride everywhere.
There's fluoride in your water, there's fluoride in
shower, there's fluoride in things you cook your
food in, there's fluoride in foods that you're
eating, there's natural fluoride. The bottom line is
it's an obvious provable reality that the amount
they say is dangerous you come to in
constant points around your life.
Not because it should be there, but because
they add it for your safety.
Even though it's hurting you and your children.
It really does bother me that these things
aren't enough. You know? Like, this is not
just some fringe site, this is from the
government. And the point is, as I'll show
you here, make sure you check out Derek's
work for the for the podcast, I'm just
showing the menu. On our TLIVE team, you
have all of our names. And Derek has
a lot of good,
different kind of,
series.
I don't wanna
shoot.
Oh well, I have to move the window
for a second.
So here, is this fluoride trial
page. Alright. This this one is just a
category.
But I wanted to bring this up too
and show you where to find it so
you can look for future things.
But that has a lot of different work.
Starting with the last one, but goes on.
I mean, there's probably 18 or 6 maybe
well, a lot. Over 10 articles in here
covering this from right when this began. And
at the time, what were we getting? Fake
news. That's a conspiracy theory. It's good for
your teeth, and they're all wrong. All of
them.
I mean, there's there's some you can see
just right here that were important. For example,
where was that? I think it's the next
one.
Just showing you documents they released that prove
to you. I shouldn't take too much time
on this. I got a lot to talk
about today. But I'm really I'm just really
proud of the work Derek has done here.
And how and how important this is to
the bigger picture about medical freedom, but about
anything.
There's Michael Conant for you right there. Interviews
he's had with doctors who are on the
record, doctors that have worked with WHO, doctors
that have worked with different who are telling
you that they know it's dangerous, and they
know that they're actively covering it up for
a very long time.
Anyway so to bring to mind things like
East Palestine and the reality that they're very
aware. Like, that was that's what I think
I one thing I think about East Palestine
is that ultimately that conversation
was about some very obvious cover ups, some
very obvious criminal activity from your government colluding
with corporations, you know, good old fascism,
that, ultimately, it coincided with another problem, which
that the the burning and their effort to
cover it up caused a massive dioxin pollution,
which we've now found out spread to
30 different states. Oh, gee. Just like we
told you the day that was happening, they
covered up until far too late to do
anything about it. But nobody comes back and
goes, oh, yeah. Ryan, everybody else talking about
that. Turns out you were alright. Let's make
sure we listen to you next time. Nope.
It gets buried. Now the fake alternative media
out there and the corporate continue influence influencing
you with fake information.
The point is that dioxins are everywhere. They've
been doing this for a very long time.
Same with PFAS and same with all sorts
of chemicals that they know and we can
prove are dangerous. As with PFAS, as I
showed you in the article, they're now, oh,
looks looks like it hurts your fertility by
40%.
But what's happening? Oh, nothing. That was from,
like, 6 months ago. Guess what? It's still
everywhere. They're not even trying to stop do
doing what they're doing, the military included. They
know these things are hurting you and they
don't care. Now whether that's profit and corporations
influencing your government or the other way around,
it doesn't really matter. This is what you're
voting for. And if you think that one
side or the other cares about any of
this, you're not paying attention. Now, RFA junior
has a very particular stance around this stuff
that does seem different. But his stance with
everything else, and now we're gonna get into
falling in line with everybody else,
doesn't seem to make me feel like it's
gonna change.
I hope so. As always, I genuinely hope
so. Another article that Robert wrote excuse me.
That, Derek wrote before we then this this
will kick us off on this conversation
about the 2 party illusion.
America's Frontier Fund, something Whitney's written about as
well, as well as Thiel and Schmidt in
particular.
The venture capital firm with ties to Peter
Thiel and Eric Schmidt. Now one thing he
writes about in this article is not just
the obvious overlap to the financial influence, but
the Thiel's over here with Trump and Vance,
then you've got Schmidt on the other side
with the democrats, and they've they've oscillated back
and forth. But what it really shows you,
and whether it's about Bilderberg, which they're both,
steering members of the committee,
or it's about anything else.
It shows you that these these are the
donor class. These are the ones that are
influencing, these are the string pullers, and it's
there there's string pullers above them too. But
the ultimate reality is that this
is the blob behind it all that wins
no matter what you do as long as
you partake in the same old two party
illusion. As long as you pick one of
the same things, you end up giving the
people that are in control more control.
Now look, my my point is before we
get as we start this segment, it is
not to say that we that
we shouldn't do anything. That's the opposite of
what we're saying. I mean, I could go
in and I have had shows about the
solution side of this, and Derek is all
about that. That's mostly what he talks about.
But my point is simply to make sure
that the people who don't yet see it
recognize that problem.
The idea that we always need someone to
tell us what we should do next is
part of that problem.
If we can't first acknowledge the problem exists
and then do our best individually to seek
a solution to the obvious, then we don't
wanna see the problem. Because the idea is
that if we can recognize that we're that
both sides are, essentially,
just 2 parts of the same monster,
And then knowing that, you still kind of
go, well, I but I if I they
told me if I vote for 1 versus
the other, I'm only gonna get the other
one. Or if I vote for 3rd party,
I'm only gonna let the other side win.
I mean, it's the same game I make
fun of every time. They're the ones telling
you your vote matters, and every vote counts,
except when it comes down to that. And
they go, oh, but don't vote for that
person. Otherwise, you're wasting it. But you just
said it doesn't you just said every vote
counts.
It's always about trying to convince you that
by leaning into the options they provide,
that you will get what you want.
All it really amounts to is that the
entity, the government, gets what it wants if
it convinces you those are the only options.
Now here,
bringing this to Twitter for a minute before
we get deeper into this because I see
this is a central part of how people
are being manipulated about all of this.
Right now, just like with Twitter files, what
we saw, is them trying to make up
It's it's it's in and of itself even,
it's sort of a false dichotomy.
Here's Doze Designer saying, legacy media is witnessing
a decline in viewership, which has been going
on for a long time.
A long time. I mean, look, this is
in general
actually, I'm not sure how accurate these bottom
ones are.
I'm to be quite honest, it's not even
about the graph. I'm not the I've seen
quite,
contradictory information in the the bottom. The point
is that all of them. Because what it
it seems to show CNN basically no worse
than it was in 214 2014. I disagree
with that. Anyway, the point is,
legacy media
has been on decline. CNN, in more in
particular, it seems, more than I've ever seen
in my lifetime. Like, completely to the point
to where we've all seen the shift. Now
they're asking for donations. Now they're asking for
funding. Now they're firing people. So that has
been going on a long time, and that
is because of the independent media, in my
opinion.
Now x comes on Twitter, comes on to
the scene post Elon Musk. That is not
why this is happening. That's what they want
to frame it as because that makes it
into somehow him saving free speech. But here's
the bigger point.
It says, well, x continues to break new
all time usage records, but what what do
those two things have to do with each
other? Are you are you framing x as
the media alternative
to the mainstream media? X is not a
media location. X is a social media platform
in through which people who may have media
share it.
But you see, that's not x as the
source. I made this point yesterday. They're literally
trying to this is part this is part
2 of the Twitter files, in my opinion.
To reimagine what you believe you see as
media. Twitter files, what it did was convince
you that screenshots were enough.
They never showed the source material. And that's
not to say that Matt Taibbi and the
rest I I mean, I've seen Matt gone
to do good work. I disagree with all
certain plenty of different things he you know,
positions he has, but I've see I I
think he does good work in many ways.
My point is that he broke off from
all this because I think he sensed there
was something afoul and they seemingly burned that
relationship.
He's the reason Substack won't even they Elon
won't even let
the the meta meta data post up from
Substack. You just get the link. Right?
My point is that they didn't give you
source material. So they swore up and down
that everything was backed by what they were
just showing you screenshots. Now, my mind was
most almost all of that, if not all,
was genuinely backed by that. Most of it
we already knew anyway. But what they did
was effectively set you up to think that
what was more important was the person showing
you the screenshot.
What if they were wrong? What if there
was more context to the
400 other pages around that paragraph you saw
that might change what you think, even in
the same direction.
So this is setting you up to think
that this that the Twitter
and really ridiculous people that he seems to
continually promote, who don't have who are wrong
half the time or send things out that
he can't prove that later turn out to
not be the case or that are backed
by partisan lies or just flat out share
things that are false, including Elon Musk,
that they want that they're somehow the media
and that x is the platform. X is
the media platform. It's not. Now they're not
explicitly saying that, but listen to what they
said. Legacy Media is witness a decline
witnessing a decline, while x continues to break
all time there's no way to misunderstand that.
That's the counterbalance.
Then it says this is because Legacy Media
simply can't compete with the 100 of millions
of people providing real time information.
Now I don't disagree with that.
I think that information is important. The difference
is when people like this and his kind
of chosen gaggle of morons
continue to act like they're the media, but
really what they're doing is showing content, but
then there's a source behind that that you're
not getting. That is an illusion.
And he says legacy media continues to plummet
in viewers and readers. I I agree with
that. But it's not because of Elon and
Narfall and Lumer, it's because of people out
there challenging them with genuine media platforms.
And through, in some cases, posting their work
on x or Twitter.
That's the reality.
Now
oh, and this is now this there's a
couple of different points on Twitter I wanted
to point out before we get further into
this. Now this is about the you might
have seen this.
Neuralink discussion.
Now it's just so funny to me how
people now to be clear before people start
rethinking this is only about the right. We're
we're gonna go back and forth on this.
I've got a whole thing about the Kamala
and the DNC.
This is about our government as a whole
and the ideologues pretending to be left and
right on this side. And, I mean, they
identify these things. That's it's only pretend as
in so far as that they're not that
they're fighting themselves.
But that both of them are clearly influenced
by the Zionism we're gonna discuss and actively
are fighting for genuinely the same direction.
But he says, update about the 2nd Neuralink
device in humans. If all goes well, there
will be 100 of people with Neuralink within
a few years. That's terrifying. Maybe tens of
thousands within 5 years, millions within 10 years.
Now let me ask you this. If the
argument is it's all about Parkinson's and limbs
and so on,
10,
5,000,000?
I don't think there's millions of people that
have the problem they're discussing. Maybe I'm wrong.
I mean, may I might take that back.
Maybe that adds up. But either way,
I think we can very clearly sense this
is not about
even even in the positive fun side of
this, like ignoring all the very terrifying dystopian
stuff around all this,
that this is not just about solving, you
know, hurts, you know, giving people used their
limbs again. One of the things they talk
about is is somebody using this to play
video games.
So this is literally about what Whitney and
I talked about a long time ago in
regard to
the kinda plugging into the system, the metaverse
overlap. Like, that that's what this is more
so about as well as the surveillance, as
the technocratic direction. I mean, everything we've discussed,
and it's not it's not even a secret.
He he talks about these things like it's
a fun project.
To me, this is terrifying, especially since this
is a open and obvious Zionist technocratic billionaire
military contractor. I don't. Just because Elon and
the names and the game they play around
him, those words should mean something to you.
He works with all the same people we
should be terrified of.
And frankly, I think we are, and mostly
even the right. I don't get it. And
as I said, had this been Gates or
Schwab,
you all would've cared and resisted.
You know that. But instead, the technocracy Pied
Piper has led the way.
Now that's how I see it. I hope
I'm wrong. But come on, we know as
a matter of fact, if this was Bill
Gates coming up and saying, I've got a
Neuralink thing for all of you, they would've
freaked out, laughed about it, and they would've
called it
the devil, you know, mark of the whatever.
You we all know that. So is it
really just about the fact that they gave
you a guy you think's on your side?
We can't be that simple.
Ian says, all those supposed right pillars who
understand
that the predator class, all of them,
has been in control for generations and used
their 3 liter agencies to study behaviors
somehow can't grasp that they have the ability
to fool them with a politician or celebrity.
Again, I hope I'm wrong. My point is
a lot of them would say that they
can grasp that. They just don't think Elon
is that, and fair enough.
But
I think all the evidence is there.
All of the I mean, again, if this
was simply a different character,
with I mean, you take exactly the same
data. Exactly. All the things you think make
Elon, you know, the examples you think show
he's on your side, but then you also
show all the things that are concerning. All
the great reset overlaps and all the work
he's working with, the people he's aligned with,
Palantir.
You know, if that if you just fill
in Gates or Schwab or anybody else, they
would have a different opinion. So that really
does come down to, and we all know
that,
the ideologue.
And as Kevork points out, right, just, you
know, if we don't yeah. Why I don't
get it? Why can't everybody see that?
Now in regard to other aspects of this,
and this is what I keep seeing is
what it's it's almost unreal to me that
we have somebody like that, who if in
any other skin would be called exactly what
it is. We have the example of Andrew
Tate.
Whether it's about Zionism and the the spaces
they went on, which all he did was
just completely
there was a lot of important things that
were being discussed and all he did was
ruin that, which I think is exactly the
point.
I don't know why in in in the
same point in a different way. That on
the right side of the conversation,
what is something they've constantly been focusing on?
And I think rightly so, which is a
huge conversation that it's not a conspiracy theory
that there are clear sex trafficking networks
sex trafficking networks in the world. That's obvious.
Epstein was an obvious example of that that
we can't deny because even they were forced
to admit it.
And of course, the the the conversation around
law, pizzagate, or whatever else, which was a
whole, you know,
bee's nest of lies and manipulation that was
rooted in a very real story.
The idea is that somebody like Andrew Tate,
who is clearly and provably as Milk Bar
TV and arrest have very easily proven. There's
not some up for debate conversation. He's on
video admitting
the reality and that and the time frame,
the showing you the girl he's talking about,
that this was a 14 year old girl.
He didn't realize he was admit you know,
I guess he doesn't think people are smart
enough to break down a timestamp, look at
these videos, and compare it to what he
said before. Tucker and Candace and others gave
him these softball interviews that allowed him to
lie about damn near everything.
And as David Ike points out, you can
literally look at him saying and admitting and
laughing about the things that he says were
never happened. The guy is a disgusting criminal.
The guy is a woman the guy is
a
this is this is somebody who is not
who who is using you
to either keep himself out of jail or
or in some other way use the movement
to benefit himself. My point is that in
any other circumstance, this would have been a
person that would have been seen through in
regard to the sex trafficking overlap, the idea
of pedophilia, the idea of whatever else. A
very clear focal point for the right, but
yet for whatever reason, I don't know, because
Tucker said hi to him, suddenly he's a
we're gonna ignore all that. All of that
becomes the matrix
is trying to get him.
Okay. Let's just pretend, you know, aside from
the old school term that doesn't even apply
in the context of the conversation, let's just
say the the gov the deep state is
out to get him.
You're gonna ignore all of these ev all
the evidence because what? They're out to get
him? Like, doesn't it matter to you that
you can't prove what they're arguing?
The point is, as Billboard Chris even says,
Andrew and Turchin Tate are pedophiles and just
had their home raided in a criminal case
concerning sexual intercourse with a minor and traffic
of minors. Now here's what Milk Bar TV
points out, and, again,
it is easy to prove should you care
to look.
This was something that was building long before
he got used
the Zionism spaces to make it look like
this is why they were already gonna come
get him.
Milk Bar TV made the very clear videos
before that and after going, look, guys. This
was a building thing. It was already about
to happen. Then clearly, as he's already done
multiple times, taps into the right wing conversation,
and for whatever reason, he's I the leaders
of that movement continue to allow him to
use them.
And then that right afterward his house gets
raided like was clearly going to happen and
then he go, oh, he talks about this.
He realized he adds nothing to the conversation,
there's no substance, it is all surface level
talking points with nothing to back it up,
usually misrepresenting
it or hollow without
more of the information because he sees you
talking about it.
That's what this guy does. He's a secondhand
version of real truth tellers out there who
are clumsily relaying things that he thinks are
challenging, in many cases are contentious,
and I guess that's enough. To stand up
and say, Jews run the world, is somehow
gonna make you the person you're supposed to
live in even though, again, that's not the
reality.
It's a part of something larger. And we
can acknowledge that it's a Zionism problem. There's
more Christian Zionists there on the world, but
there are surely a lot of Jewish Zionists
that are part of this problem.
But, yeah, let's give you a fraction of
the story and hope that that gets you
attention, and hopefully people will give you money.
The bottom line is he goes on to
say, he admits on video to recruiting 15
year olds for sex. It's right here.
It's right there if you care to look.
And for his pornographic website business and by
DMing them on Instagram. And everybody wants to
have a narrative about why this guy is
pers they're going after him and they're lying
about him. Yeah. He's a creep, but he's
actually fine. He's thristing everything to tell the
truth. Well, so are a hell of a
lot of other people saying it with more
facts backed up by source material.
It just kills me how people can't see
through people like this. And it says he's
targeted 20 per day per his own admission.
Will Tate promoters like Patrick Bet David, Candace
Owens, Tucker Carlson,
denounce these creep why won't you denounce these
creeps? That's what he asks. What's the difference
between supporting Andrew Tate brothers and supporting Jeffrey
Epstein?
The fact that you pretend like all the
evidence that is clearly on him that you
can prove and the things he admits to
on tape somehow aren't real? Well, it's real
easy just to ignore it. Right? But that's
not really something a journalist would do.
The answer is, of course, absolutely nothing, he
says. Now here, Milkbar TV points out,
Andrew Tate, this is on the 21st, and
Tristan Tate have been charged with sexual intercourse
with a minor and trafficking of minors.
But all of the people supporting him are
suddenly like, oh, he was on a podcast.
He said the thing he's not supposed to
say. If you listen to what he said,
you point out one thing that he says
on there that you don't find right now
on many other podcasts. And and is the
argument because he's got lots of money and
he and, you know, I I guess the
point is about the amount of followers he
has.
But if you can prove he's a criminal
based on these other gas the the fact
this was already coming, I don't know why
you would blindly lean into the idea that
wasn't there. But I hope you can see
this for what it is. The point is
it's another example of somebody who is using
this side.
And I the blindness around it. But here's
another video I'm not gonna play. I just
played them the last show. It's not I
hate even bringing this up, but it's important
to try to get people to see
how they're being played. And I look. I
I the reason I you know why a
lot of people avoid this conversation? Because these
people are are vicious.
They've got trolls and people out there that
will take real world action. But
I don't shy away from what's important. Simply
won't. But it says, this is a video
that clearly proves to undertake trafficked women. Watch
it for yourself, guys. He's right he literally
sits there and explains to you how he
does this, and why he does it, and
how he abuses women. It's right on the
surface.
David Icke says this. Now, this is,
what's his name again?
Fuentes.
He says just 2 days after Andrew Tate
said the matrix is really just the Jewish
mafia, his house was raided by and he
was arrested again. Yeah. Because that was already
about to happen. It's it's it's childishly obvious.
But I think a lot of people lean
into it too because it gets them influence.
The point is if you listen to this
video I mean, my whole thing about this,
I'm I've honestly, I've very I've very seen
very little work from Fuentes
Fuentes, just because
even just listening to this one clip, I
immediately start hearing the things that give me
pause.
Which I I get just generally kind of
look at as ignorance masquerading as insight. Which
is ultimately like, I I, you know, Jews
run, are influencing everything. I'd prefer Catholics run
everything. If you want and and that's this
whole premise of this clip. That we should
actually want Catholics to run everything. Well, how
about we don't want one of religion running
anything?
It just seems like a it's another false
dichotomy like everything else. Now maybe he actually
believes that. I don't know. But I just
don't see how this is the leading conversation
or these are the leading people having this
conversation.
I am not willing to admit that most
people in the world are this blind or
this ignorant.
But David Icke, who sees through it, says
you have no idea what the matrix is,
Nicholas, and let's do and neither do the
Tates.
You are still focusing on the oil rags
of global control, not the engineers. It seems
you want a Catholic dystopia to replace what
you perceive as a Jewish one. You do
not know that the Catholic church throughout its
history has a been a fundamental
servant of, in quotes, the matrix.
You don't.
Oh, that explains it. He says one tyranny
replaced by another is not freedom. But then
it seems that you don't want freedom, only
your version of tyranny.
That is the best possible way to explain
how the paradigm works, guys. That's it's just
everything.
They don't really want anything different, they just
want their control over the problem. And it
says, for your information, and they may not
know that, but that's what that represents to
me. He says, for your information, those running
the Jewish mafia, the it all in quotes,
the Catholic mafia, the Islam Lomick mafia, the
Hindu mafia, the Democrat mafia, republican mafia, change
climate change mafia, west mafia, UN mafia, etcetera,
etcetera,
are all the same
mafia.
That's the message, guys. And he says, what
a black and white mind you must have,
Nicholas. Shakes head, gets on with life.
You know, I mean, I I agree I
agree.
I I I know I know I know
David has a lot of opinions that seem
to scare people away. I really don't know
why. He's a very intelligent person. And, yeah,
some of these things can be different,
but he isn't listen to him. He's a
smart guy. The point
is that we have to be able to
start seeing through the the
chosen representatives, whether are the
influencers
or pretending to be journalists or the governmental
people. These it's obvious that we keep getting
played with insiders or people that are and
they these these people that get tapped to
represent the conversation.
Listen to them. Listen to everybody.
Stop falling for these traps of these larger
talking points.
The problem is that ultimately they only want,
as he says, your version of tyranny.
Now talking about that, let's talk about Twitter
in this conversation in regard to something that
recently just came out. Now this is not
necessarily entirely new, but just, again, the idea
of how we are being played.
The point is that Twitter or the conversation
is supposed to be that they're fighting the
censorship. They're fighting for free speech. They're pushing
back. I guess a lot of the right
is seeing it as the left.
Fighting back against the left. Right? But
that doesn't seem to add up much when
you realize that somebody like Jack Dorsey, for
example, is still part owner of Twitter because
he is. Now, that was actually shown on
an older article, but it was confirmed just
with another leak based on the current lawsuit
that they were forced to give all the
information
that he's still one of them.
Or a leader of a a a politician
in Saudi Arabia.
Or all sorts of very problematic
surveillance entities like Oracle,
or groups that are involved with Palantir or
Sequoia Capital, all these groups that are very
problematic
for I mean, things that any other conversation
might be flame kind of framed as part
of the left for me, it's just the
government.
And it's everything that we see as Elon
representing. The idea of the Thiel, Palantir,
Vance, Trump kind of blob that's developing or
the idea of how he is working with
every element of what they're talking about in
regard to the great reset or building parts
of it or mRNA
microfactories or everything.
Everything.
And how all of that is ignored because
he says things that make people think he's
on you. I just this is I still
believe that most people aren't this easy to
trick. I think that most people who are
uncomfortable with how this all looks,
ultimately, the main trick that gets them is
they still fall into the party line. Like
we're seeing with RFK sweeping everybody right back
in. Or that they end up in that
position and don't want to, but they don't
know what else to do. Or that they
end up listening to the Tuckers, whoever else,
or the the leading ideologues of the left
and the right.
And even though it goes against what they
feel, they go, oh, well, you know, how
do they know better? Whatever it is. I
don't believe that most everybody falls for this
stuff. Or how about the other point coming
off of the
tape discussion?
Somebody like p Diddy.
Yeah. P Diddy seems to be an owner
in Twitter. Isn't it weird how this conversation's
kind of coming up about how and I
I I honestly don't know the the validity
of whether or not the larger picture is
true, but there's a whole conversation right now
of allegations about sex trafficking, about sexual assault
coming and I've heard all sorts of different
claims. I I I don't think any of
it's been proven yet. But it's interesting
that this kind of a person is part
of this when in again, my point is
if this was anybody on the left, the
conversation
would go in an obvious direction. But this
came out a few days ago and I
haven't seen anybody talk about it. Not in
the case of like we're saying. But as
Will, this guy guy from washi post highlights
this and says, we finally have an official
list of the investors.
So here it is.
Here's who helped Elon buy, Twitter. Now this
is the old one. This is for 2022.
This is the new one. We'll come to
this next.
But just to show you, I find it
actually interesting. This goes back to 2022.
And it goes over some of the investors.
Some of which are foreign investors. And I
think that's important to start with. It's even
before this, we already knew Prince Alwaleed bin
Talal Al Saud.
Why why does it worry people that you
I mean, it's by the way, that's not
even remotely new. During Jack Dorsey's reign, that
he they were also, they own they were
the largest personal stake, I think, during that
point.
But I find that to be concerning, and
it's one of the largest. $2,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
estimated contribution to Twitter.
An open authoritarian regime.
Doesn't that seem interesting? Like, what about all
the people that are siding with Elon and
the rest? Like, they're fighting like they're fighting
with Israel against the Muslim problem or whatever
they wanna call it, and all of a
sudden, you were working with Saudi Arabia, which
is one of the most radical elements of
exactly but it doesn't matter because they're on
our side. Oh, so you don't care about
those things then? You only care about winning?
Like, that none of that makes any sense
when you stand back and look at it.
But not never does it from the 2
party illusion.
Qatar,
of course, which, remember, Qatar is the one
that is working with Israel, if you look
far enough, to fund Hamas or hide the
people leading Hamas in their country, but that
doesn't matter, apparently, as long as we ignore
it. Or Binance.
$500,000,000
toward the purchase. I find this interesting because
Binance is a cryptocurrency platform or, you know,
trading platform. But here's what it says. What
do they get? So these are all the
foreign entities. So any one of these, whether
it's Binance, Saudi Arabia, or Qatar, a part
of the deal, anyone who invests $250,000,000
or more gets a special access to confidential
company information.
Think about that. And think about how we've
already proven to you that Authentics, which is
an Israeli verification entity from 80 200 connection
that works with a huge portion of Israeli
intelligence in general. So they're part of the
mess you know, Mossad intelligence sort of overlap.
They're the ones still verifying whether or not
you are a person on Twitter
despite him claiming otherwise. I keep looking and
it's still there. They're still using that.
They have access to your biometrics, your personal
information, and so do all the rest of
them. Doesn't that bother you? And it says,
but giving that privilege to foreign investors is
raising flags with Biden and other officials. Probably
not. But it says, of particular interest is
whether that includes access to personal data.
No. Maybe not.
But frankly, I don't bond why it wouldn't.
These people are buying access to the to
the
product.
And the product is your data, guys. That's
what it is. Let's not mince words here.
That's real that's that and machine learning using
you are what this is really about.
Artificial intelligence and data mining.
Now it says, since several of the entities
are entwined with governments that have a history
of cracking down on dissidents,
And there have access to that personal information.
Now we see people like Andrew Sin Horowitz,
people like or groups like Sequoia Capital, which
by the way are immer immensely tied in
with Israeli startup companies.
Larry Larry Ellison,
cofounder
of Oracle,
and we've talked about Oracle before. Google and
Oracle to monitor Americans who get Warp Speed
vaccine. That's the actual pharmacovigilance
for Mansef Salawi and Warp Speed. Right? Where
they there's As far as I know, it
at least they claim it went on for
2 full years after this started. Not not
theirs or anything else, but their personal database
that we never got to see.
Yeah. They were and that's why it was
a big experiment.
My point is to show you how all
these overlapped. Jack Dorsey was there from the
beginning, which I find interesting, that that just
didn't really get talked about. Morgan Stanley, Bank
of America, Barclay, you know, all the good
guys. Right?
Okay. So that was the old one. Here's
here's what we're finding out as of 21st
August, which I really haven't seen many talk
about this, but I find interesting.
Oh, here. I just have it highlighted.
So it says shareholders named in the documents
include some of Silicon Valley's most prominent venture
capitalists. And let's not forget, as Whitney talks
about Silicon Valley being essentially the the leading
entity and the kind of incestuous overlap with
Israeli unit a 200 startup companies and all
of those same problems.
It says as well as the fund linked
with hip hop mogul Sean Diddy Combs. So
that's one of the bigger ones that comes
out. I just find that interesting. Now it
says the filing
lists nearly a 100 entities with a stake
in Twitter, although it many appear to represent
different funds controlled by the same firm or
person.
And and Andreessen Horowitz, Saudi prince, Sa Saud,
I'd I'll say it before. Alaweed Saad. Twitter
founder, Jack Dorsey. So still to this point.
8VC, a venture capital firm cofounded by Joe
Lonsdale, cofounder of intelligence contractor and data analysis
platform, Palantir. So So now you've got an
Oracle overlap. You've got a Palantir overlap.
We know what this is. Whitney's been trying
to tell you for a really long time.
Maybe one of the reasons why they didn't
really want this to come out. Now, again,
the reason this came out is because of
the GARM
lawsuit that they initiated against the group they
were part of, which makes no sense. And
the fact that sort of dissolved even though
as,
what's his name? I keep forgetting his name.
Shoot. Benz. Mike Benz. As Mike Benz
points out,
the entity
has built in a way that ensures that
it can continue working even when even if
they break up.
So as Casey Wright pointed out, I think
it's an illusion. I think the whole point
is that a lawsuit that I I was
told by many didn't have much chance of
really succeeding
was initiated
and it was a small and and again,
the point was it was how much money
was involved? It doesn't make any sense that
that would dissolve the whole thing.
But the problem now is that the narrative
was set, that they pushed back and they
got rid of the thing that they were
also working with. July 4th for for forward,
Twitter had already repartnered with GAR. And on
top of that, their own lawsuit made clear
that they had already
met or exceeded the vast majority of what
GAR wanted. And, also, another report came out
showing, I think, 87%
of the government demand since Twitter took over,
he has acquiesced.
Well, let's all pretend like it's not
the the opposite of what we're being told.
But it goes on to say, Unipul
SPA, an Italian financial service company based in
Bologna,
says the this month, Twitter filed suit filed
suit against
GARM. Again, as I just said, that's ultimately
what initiated this.
Now this is the overall breakdown. You can
look at every single one involved.
Well, all the ones we just listed off,
Jack Dorsey and all the rest. It's all
in here if you wanna look further. Maybe
you'll pluck out something that I'm not seeing.
There's fortune making the same point. Elon Musk
was just forced to reveal who really owns
it. Just a couple added points. It says
the the list seen by fortune reveals the
Pershing Square Foundation owns a stake at Twitter.
If the name sounds familiar, that's because it's
linked to Pershing Square Holdings, funded by founded
by billionaire investor Bill Ackman 20 years ago.
Bill Ackman overlapped with a lot of different
things we've discussed, very, very pro Israel
and advocating and those you know, using his
own platforms and media to influence that conversation.
Elsewhere on the list of owners is Oracle
founder, Larry Ellison, which we just showed you.
Another notable, Sean Combs, p Diddy.
Or excuse me, Puff Daddy, whatever you wanna
call him. I think p Diddy is what
he called himself today. Prince the prince from
Saudi Arabia. It also seems that despite his
criticism of Musk's leadership all the way to
this day, Jack Dorsey still owns shares in
this company. That seems like a little bit
of a contradiction of the left versus right
discussion or that Jack somehow was, you know,
with their Twitter. They were, you know, try
he Twitter was, you know, or Elon was
taking back over and getting rid of all
the bad stuff. Quite frankly, I think we're
all being plagued with this. It says elsewhere
on the list are the Silicon Valley VCs
one might expect. 8 VC, Anderson how or
Anderson Horowitz, and Sequoia Capital. All of which
I think are problematic. We've written about, talked
about in the past.
Now oh, and this was to show you
this just kinda this one of the points
you're making. It says the raids came from
this on, p Denny's house
after, list of civil lawsuits that alleged abuse
and sexual assault by multiple victims spanning over
30 years. Now I'm I'm not gonna get
too much into it because I just haven't
seen this. If you have more information on
that, please reach out to me. Let me
know. It's interesting. We'll see how that flushes
out. And then, again, I'll include the link
to Oracle and and the reality of how
that overlaps with surveillance, which is really the
point that stands out to me. Palantir, Oracle,
surveillance of what you're doing for groups like
Israel and Zionism and the
rest. Now what Whitney points out in regard
to RFK, as we get into that part
of the segment, in the 2 party illusion,
she says the inevitable embrace of the Trump
campaign by RFK Junior will see one of
the COVID era's most prominent and promoted
skeptics
embrace the man whose administration established the early
COVID policies and military run, op, warp speed.
What a world and what a disappointment.
100% agree.
The problem here
let me read that and I'll go back
to it.
Is that this is there's no way you
can pretend that this is just what he
has to do.
I'll get into the other options, but the
the bottom line is this is just simply
contradictory.
This is very
reminiscent of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton and
and or Bernie Sanders in another situation. Every
the point is that they continue to they
will stand up and say, this person is
the worst person. They're a criminal and they've
done this, and they fall back in and
endorse.
Or the fact that you can make all
sorts of arguments about what you're fighting against
and yet somehow fall in line with a
person who is actively still promoting, out of
all things, the shot.
I that is the thing that just on
still blows me away more than anything,
is that we that we act like this
is not the obvious case. And this is
Trump has never
gone away from this.
Okay. People have died under COVID this year,
by the way, under Joe Biden
than under you. And more people took the
vaccine this year, so people are questioning how
the vaccine. Now to be clear,
she was setting him up just to challenge
it,
which is very funny to me. Like, if
you if you were in this position, wouldn't
you challenge this?
She would say more people took it this
time. But getting getting into you know, and
that's why more people died, and more people
are taking it. And then he just goes
and it was a good thing. It just
goes right over the top. And she just
goes, mhmm. And just lets it go.
And we see have died under COVID this
year, by the way, under Joe Biden Right.
Than under you. And more people took the
vaccine this year, so people are questioning Right.
So that means that more people took it,
and then more people died. So more people
are asking whether it's and she jumps in.
How Well, no. The vaccine worked, but some
people aren't telling you. The ones Oh, so
the vaccine worked. Right. So that makes sense
after what she just said?
No. That's just your narrative. Your narrative that
she go she gives you a statement that
clearly suggests it doesn't. And, no, it works
though. It works. No, it doesn't, Trump, and
you damn well know that. Your entire audience
knows that. Everybody knows that. The only people
that are still maintain I mean, this is
what's so mind blowing to me.
Of all people that are still maintaining
I mean, I honestly don't even who else
is even arguing that this thing is
a success?
I'll I'll get into it in the in
the medical part of this conversation probably in
the next show, but my god. There's very
few people that are saying not just that
they're saying that it was a success, that
it worked. There are people that are saying
the mRNA direction is a success and that
there was some failure, but we're gonna do
better.
Even Fauci said that the whole thing failed.
He wrote the cell.com article that said that
this was we need to do better. We're
gonna be but he just will not give
up the idea that this thing helped people.
It was a wholesale
failure or rather just specifically a wholesale
it wasn't an accident in my opinion.
And he will not give up on that.
How does anybody believe that? I don't care
if this is the only out of everything
else he said, if everything was the best
thing in the world and he just wouldn't
go away from that, how do we pretend
like he doesn't see what his entire base
says? Or if you think he just disagrees
with you, certainly his prerogative,
how do you think he comes to that
conclusion with everything that we have? All the
people that are sending him information with RFK
Jr telling them. I mean, my god.
I just this is a screaming red flag
of dishonesty.
The ones that get So people are questioning
how Well, no. The vaccine work, but Yeah.
Some people aren't taking. The ones the ones
that get very sick and go to the
hospital are the ones that don't take their
vaccine.
That's a lie. That's a it's a provable
lie
with with the with the data we have.
You can look at the statistics, and you
could prove that he's wait. We are proving
that day to day in the midst of
this using the UK data. Remember that? Breaking
it down in real time as they were
going, it's working. We said, well, here's the
data. We could prove that it doesn't. And
then they started they stopped showing you that
data
for your safety, apparently.
But it's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected.
Nope. Sorry, Trump. That's not true.
I I I look. I genuinely don't even
think he believes that. I think that is
because that is how you win. And then,
honestly, a lot of people then argue that's,
well, he's gotta win to be able to
change the
well, that's the that that's a point that
we're talking about now. If you can stand
by the idea that he has to pretend
it weren't to get elected, that means you're
okay with him killing children
just until the election so he can win,
and that and that will change everything.
Is that okay with you? The family that
just got convinced to take it because they
saw that clip and they go, okay. Well,
I'll take it. Because they're pushing them still
right now.
They go out and they take it, and
that's okay with you? If you make that
make sense, then that is the lesser of
2 evils example and that your world has
been overtaken by that. The real answer is
to say no. I will not support somebody
who would make that sacrifice. And that means
neither of them. So the the question should
not be
you have to pick between these 2 people.
The core the the point should be we
demand more than 2 people that murder people.
We demand a real situation with actual selections
that are outside the control paradigm.
If everybody actually made that demand, then they
would because the game is that we as
Americans dictate the process. Right? These are people
that are acting in our in the embodiment
of our living will. It's not the reality,
but they play that game that where we
put them in power and they act out
what we want. That's not true.
But let's put that to the test. Let's
stand up and say, the not nobody on
this stage is somebody that is fit to
run.
Of course, they'll just go forward anyway, and
that's the point they make. Let them go
forward. Like, if we actually want change, this
is probably going to take more than one
cycle. It's gonna take people pushing back and
letting them pretend somebody won, which by the
way, would happen anyway.
This game they play where you act like,
Oh, if I vote for them then I'm
gonna give it to the other person. Well
guess what? If we literally all sat on
our hands and didn't do anything, they would
still pretend somebody won. It's gonna happen either
way, like it is in any other illegitimate
election in the world.
So we as Americans need to call their
bluff. If we want this to change, we
need to call it out and expose that.
We need to push harder and stand by
what we believe in. Because going along with
what RFK shows
you, go for Trump, that is challenging
your principles,
your integrity.
Even if you think voting for RFK or
whoever else other than those 2 is somehow
hurting, you know, allowing the other one to
win,
you are still standing by what you believe
in. If we all did that, that wouldn't
be possible for them to do anymore.
It's the choice to fall in that allows
this to continue being something that traps you
every time.
Now as Whitney I'll read the first one
again. The inevitable embrace of the Trump campaign
by RFK Jr
will see one of the COVID era's most
prominent and promoted skeptics embrace the man whose
administration established the early COVID policies and military
run Operation Warp Speed. What a world and
what a disappointment.
She says perhaps the worst part is that
the people who cared about accountability
for what came downstream of Operation Warp Speed,
as well as the mass theft of American
wealth from COVID fiscal policy, predominantly during Trump's
administration,
I e, going direct, and government policy from
Birx, Fauci, etcetera, who Trump appointed,
no longer care nor maybe never did.
Trump still stands by his administration's COVID era
decisions, including Warp Speed, and also include the
COVID era QE going direct and putting Larry
Fink in charge of the US fiscal response.
I mean, guys, that that's what again, points
like that blow my mind. Right? That right
now, and rightly so, a focal point of
the right or really anybody that sees the
problem is calling out BlackRock.
And except when they can highlight that it's
connected to Rumble, we don't look at that.
Or or when we could see something like
she's highlighting here.
Right? Literally, and here I'll grab that article
even. The one I mean, at least the
show that we did on this.
I call it was called the COVID coup.
The BlackRock takeover of American interest. And this
it was undeniable.
This was a plan that was created before
the COVID 19 time frame, and then they
used it under the guise of COVID. That
is like we see this everywhere we look
in this conversation. There's Larry Fink's head on
the old standard oil graphic,
COVID coup.
So she says,
and putting Larry Fink in charge of the
US fiscal response, which should that that should
be a a nonstarter for people that see
that problem. It says, if you think Trump
learned his lesson about COVID when he still
declares warp speed a triumph, and it will
be a different time next time, a different
next time because RFK junior endorsed him, you
may be high as a kite on conservative
flavored hopium.
Policy records matter and so does accountability.
100%.
This person responds by saying, would you rather
and this is what we get, guys. And
that's why I wanted to show you this.
What she says is objectively true.
And even people that make these statements largely
agree with her. But the argument is always,
well, what are you gonna do? Vote for
Kamala?
And the prob you we need to break
this mindset.
That, like, the you if you're only coming
in from that perspective, then you've already lost.
He says, would you rather he join up
with the people who tried to forcibly inject
every woman, man, and child in America with
poison bio weapons?
Well, isn't that I mean, what's crazy about
that is that's exactly what she did. That's
his that's what happened during his administration.
Those are the people that he put in
place, and then it just continued during
Biden's administration.
But she says, if he was really against,
maybe he wouldn't endorse the administration that did
mandates or the administration that made said bioweapon.
Now he's talking about RFK there, but the
point is that either side of this you
wanna talk about him joining up with all
endorse the same thing. But he says, unfortunately,
those are the options. And that's the point.
This is what and so the point is
they see it. But they go, well, but
that's fortunately, that's where we are. That's defeatism,
guys. You are choosing to accept your fail
the the situation they presented for you. That
does not that sure doesn't sound like Americans
in control. That sounds like us accepting the
control of our government.
And he somebody just responds by going, exactly.
I get her point,
but backing neither
cannot be an option.
That's not necessarily what you said, by the
way. But she said Trump is the only
choice.
Now look. I get the logic to a
degree of what you're putting forward. That if
you accept that this is the only thing
that's going on, then, well, we got and
and you've decided Trump is better than the
rest,
then why we can't just pretend and do
nothing. Now realize, on top of all of
it,
doing nothing is not what anybody here is
talking about. Well, aside from the beginning conversation,
there's also the conversation of abstention,
which should matter to you. And, again, this
is and the people that wanna make these
points would push back and say, that's just
doing not because they don't understand
why this is something that's so important. I'll
include this as well.
If you don't know what this is, that's
part of the problem.
As I make this point about jury nullification.
These are very important things that have been
stolen from you. Now, juror,
abstention
is a part of voting.
And you'll find this little place to the
world. This is my show from this a
while ago, why your vote no longer counts,
the true power of abstention.
The reality here is that every single election
I mean, going back to the founding fathers.
The point is, you were you could say
yes, you could say no, or, you know,
for, against, whatever,
or you could abstain.
Not just walk away and not check a
box, but check the box that says abstention.
And that gets counted.
And that gets tallied. And that goes on
the screen or whatever it was at the
time. And they go, here, so we've got
10 there, 5 there, and 2 abstention. That's
supposed to be part of the process. And
the point is it's abstention is not not
voting or not abstention is a politically active
choice. You are saying, I abstain from this
vote on record
because of numerous
usually because you think that the the the
premise of the vote doesn't make sense or
that you think that it's not a legitimate
sick situation or you think that's a fraud,
like, they're they're actively keeping other choices from
your view or giving you a false selection.
Or that again, the vote itself, they the
premise is wrong. And so you can abstain,
and that gets recorded. Now imagine if we
had 90% of the country abstaining from the
election. Wouldn't that make a difference or a
large enough block to say, here's a problem?
Or that might get other people to lean
more into the idea that there is a
massive block, which is always the majority that
don't wanna vote for the broken part we
have?
There's a reason that they don't want that
to be there. There should be a box
that says abstention. That's only one possible difference.
Now, or, you know, other things we could
discuss.
Let me include that real quickly.
Now, back to the point. He says, exactly.
I get her point, but backing neither can't
be an option.
Well, yes. It can.
Or voting for somebody other than those 2.
But then here, we get into the other
part of the game, where they've already been
apparently convinced that voting for 3rd party is
just a nonstarter. Because, well, they're not gonna
win for sure. Well, how do you know
that? Don't do you not remember that they
told us that Clinton was gonna win 99%
to 1?
Yeah. Right. They they were wrong. So, we
can't fathom the possibility that this narrative is
what actually stops that from being possible?
I mean, I just all I'm really trying
to highlight here is that this this mind
this block, this this construct, mindset
that we have to do this otherwise you're
like anything else is naive. No, that's naive.
You're the one being played and you're literally
driving people off the cliff acting like you're
the one that knows and nobody understands politics,
we have to, otherwise, you're the one throwing
it away. You are the problem. Anybody saying
that is the reason this never goes away.
And then they say, would you like your
authoritarian leader to be blue or red?
Exactly.
That's Rebecca responding. Because at the end of
the day, like, let let so these people
argue that that they where they see it.
Right? But we have to choose because that's
all we have. So if you can recognize
that the problem is a false setup but
you don't know where else to go, and
your choice is between left or right and
both are authoritarian,
I just don't know why that seems to
make sense in people's minds, that the choice
is to then pick one of the 2
evils.
And that's somehow the right thing to do?
Again, I I it sounds you're it's like
you're speaking of the language. Like, I just
don't understand how in anybody's minds that can
be, but this is how propaganda works. We've
been socially engineered. This is a cult.
It's what this is. This is why it's
so difficult to get people to break through.
Again, this is what Catherine and I were
talking about. It is this is a cultish
mindset, and it's only gotten more pronounced. And
that's why the next point we're gonna get
into is is the inversion,
the or rather implosion of the entire system.
We're watching it expose itself like we've always
been telling you as just one thing. I
mean, it's all sucking in the middle right
now. We can all see it in very
lazy way. Like Israel was very clearly the
same direction, war is the same direction,
all the same narratives about voting or I
mean, they're they're they want you to see
them as 2 different things but everything they
do right now is all in the same
direction.
It's important to see. Now I'll include the
abstention article. I'll include this one as well.
Let me save that for you.
But I also wanna point out what she
said here. So she makes this point
about the fact you know, the same thing
I'm saying. Very same thing. And this person
responds to that.
And this this is the kind of thing
that kills me.
And you could you could ask it. It's
certainly possible, but, I mean, it does say
think, but this is the kind of moment
thing that happens a lot, is that you
say something that they that challenges what they
believe or that they've already been kind of,
like, set up or or, like, trained to
look for. You know? If you see them
saying this thing, that means they're secret lefty,
you know, manipulators.
This certainly, I guess, is always possible, but
then that gets people to blindly accuse you
of that because you're saying the thing that
exposes the problem. That's
manufactured ignorance, essentially. But this guy says you
really don't understand what has happened. That's see,
that's what I was just saying. They love
to project themselves as like the one that
know you're so you're you're just don't understand
politics, honey. You know? So it's like, no.
You are the child of this conversation and
you're screaming at somebody who see who sees
the bigger picture. You're at step 1, she's
at level 45. But it says, or are
you serving a
alternate narrative purpose?
Which of course, you know, or are you
secretly doing something else? It's always possible.
But as this person says, I think they
got to Whitney, sadly. If you can't see
how this is lining up with Trump bringing
RFK on,
then you are either dumb or compromised.
Hey. Hey. Another false dichotomy. How that funny
how that always works out for the the
the 2 party system.
But the problem is that
they want that to be the real they
want to believe Trump is gonna save the
world. So do I. I want I'd love
to believe any of them will save us
from the problem. Why wouldn't we want that?
What's funny though is the same way you
could point out the people that are, as
they would say, Trump derangement syndrome, would almost
hope the country fails because they don't want
Trump to be good? How I I mean,
I can prove to you right now. If
you asked all of these very, you know,
high level Republican leaders
or, you know, in the in the the
influencers,
if they would support Biden, if he did
everything in the republic, they would they wouldn't.
They would say no. If if he if
if Biden ended up being everything that people
wanted him to be in the sense of,
like let's just say he was exactly what
they think Trump is.
Let's just say that way you could prove
it somehow.
Do you think they would vote for him
under the Democrat? Of course, they wouldn't. It's
not about the policy. It's about the side.
It's team sport politics, and we all know
that.
So the problem here is that they want
Trump to be the solution, as I was
saying. I think we all should if they
if it ends up being what they actually
think. But that's why they go, but then
you can't you see it? If RFK joins,
that proves everything. It only proves or makes
it out to what you think it is
because you start with the premise that Trump
is the good guy.
All these is are political moves. All these
are these are all these are.
So for you to just say him joining
improve can't you see how it's lining up?
Yeah. From my perspective, that proves this was
always the plan, which is what I was
saying. So all it ends up is how
we perceive the moves. But to them, it
proves everything.
This guy this is child level politics, guys.
These are people that are obsessed with the
person, obsessed with winning, obsessed with being a
part of the winning team. Whatever it is,
it has nothing to do with the substance,
in my opinion.
Now, I recently talked a lot about this,
as I said at the beginning. August 18th.
How Israel used the 2 party illusion to
divide, destabilize, and control.
I mean, they're not this is ex we
go into provable information about how this is
working. Or weaponized migration experimentation.
Tools for sub subversion, division, and manufacturing consent.
And on that note, and they just had
a lot to do with Israel, here's what
Kim Iverson just recently said on that note.
Israel claims to be protecting
the west from radical Muslims,
yet
helping them destabilize the Middle East to keep
them safe
has led to millions of Muslims refugees flooding
into Western countries.
Funny how that doesn't seem to go in
the direction see the point?
You can ignore all the facts and just
listen to narrative and go, we're fighting the
bad guys. Except when you realize that Israel's
prophetic,
obsessive leadership
Rather not pro That's a bad That that
may sound pot like that. That they're extremist,
prophesizing
leadership,
rulers,
openly telling you that the way they need
that they they need to flood these countries
to the immigrants because that will bring on
the end times and realize that they have
rabbis openly talking about that. And then looking,
oh, wait a minute, but their policy seems
to be deliberately driving these refugees into these
countries. Maybe ask whether you're being played. Seems
sorta simple, doesn't it? But it says the
problem isn't actually Israel. It's us for being
dumb enough to believe every trick and lie
of Israel. And she says they're going to
do it again, by the way.
They're going to guilt us into taking thousands
of refugees from Gaza.
That's the thing we all see coming. I
don't think I I I maybe it'll actually
affect I mean, if Trump's in power, I
guarantee it'll happen. But here's the interesting thing.
I mean, I shouldn't even say that because
I who knows whether Trump will end up
bucking it for his own benefit benefit in
the United States, which is certainly possible. But
it's interesting to see how that would play
out because, obviously, that would be problematic for
his base if he allows immigrants to come
in on the guys that Israel but watch
it happen And watch them rationalize it. And
watch the republican base make make justify it
for x, y, and z and have it
all fall in line. This is what people
like us on the outside of the paradigm
can't stop seeing. From the left, from the
right, they just continue to blind themselves to
the things they pretend they believe in
when it goes in line with their agenda
or, you know, benefits them in some way.
But he said she's saying, just watch as
this happens. As they push as they justify
this and drive other countries around the world
to take in these immigrants,
forced ethnically cleansed entities, and they pummel the
place claiming they're all terrorists.
Right? Which will continue to happen.
The point is if you can't recognize how
Israel is manufacturing the problem they then point
to as what you need to fight against,
you're just blinding yourself to the reality.
And we talked about the same point, the
rise of partisan psychological warfare.
It's right on the surface. And again, it's
about the government versus you using partisanship. Or
on the other way to frame use the
word, sort of a double entendres, the idea
of partisan psychological warfare in the sense of
not governments, but, and, you know, militias or
different moderate rebel elements, things like that. We're
seeing that all over the world or, you
know, Israel funding Hamas, for example.
We also talked about the Israeli election interference
and psychological operation industrial complex.
This you need to watch.
This man, as was broken down by Guardian
and others, was on the record
influencing, and he is an Israel asset. It's
approvable reality. He's based in Israel. He's working
through the Israeli government. It's all very easy
to see with massive bot farms that are
working on Twitter right now that Elon's allowing.
And the idea that he says 27 presidential
elections around the world, they have effectively influenced
the way they want them to come out.
On the record, and nothing ever happened.
See, he he tells you he works in
the United States.
And we just talked about the leaked documents
that reveal Israel's effort to evade the FARA
act. The and specifically,
APAC, the foreign
age,
agent or was it the foreign agent re
registration act, I think? And the point is
that ultimately we're talking about the idea that
APAC has to register as a foreign agent,
you know, like JFK was trying to do
before he was killed. And the idea being
that they
the leaked documents prove that they were trying
to evade that back in 2018
and have successfully done so to this day.
And how, obviously, APAC has ramped up its
efforts in aggressive ways. So this point is
about how anybody you're voting for,
anybody
right now that is on that ballot is
a is a vote for Zionism.
It's undeniable.
Every single one of them. And if we
can't recognize that right now, maybe you don't
care. Maybe you believe in Zionism.
This is the biggest problem of this current
conversation.
They all have blindly
acquiesced to the influence of a foreign government
who was openly committing genocide. And I'll play
you Kamal Harris' statements.
They're all doing so. Right now, the the
right tries to frame it as somehow she
supporting Hamas
as the same thing happens in reverse, like
they did before as Trump's an anti Semite
racist. Like, they're all trying to pander to
what they want Israel
to benefit Israel's perception or outcome.
All of them.
It's or how about the Venezuela conversation?
They try to make it out to be
their fighting with the with you know, against
Maduro. And then the and then how they're
somehow supporting the other side, but that's not
the truth. Both sides of the government, rather
just your government,
support whoever is resisting Maduro.
But, of course, the right didn't want that
to be the narrative, so they made it
out to be Kamala supporting communism,
but they weren't, though. And neither of them
were even remotely like that. These are both
authoritarian
capitalists.
Most pretend like one's not. It's all about
narrative to get you to partake in the
same old broken lie that that voting for
one of them is your democracy.
Painful. It pains me that we keep pretending
this. Now let's talk about the 2 party
illusion.
Bet Patrick Bet David just literally said,
if you're not America if you're not fighting
for Israel, that's not America first.
Honestly, it's people like this that blow me
away how any like, the I just don't
get how people listen to the it's objectively
clear that these people are not as informed
as plenty of other people out there in
this field. But they've got lots of and
and people gravitate towards the ones that seem
to be popular. We all love to be
part of a crowd. We all it's in
our nature as humans, the species,
to sorta kinda, oh, that's what everyone's looking
at. I wanna see. And so when they
get all the views and all the funding
and everyone and yet 9 times out of
10, the thing they're adding to the conversation
is tainting it, is ruining it, is obfuscating.
Now, he has plenty of good guests. Whitney
was on there. Plenty of people are on
the show. They're they're telling you good things.
But it kills me that these, in my
opinion, are people that have been risen up
for the very purpose of keeping this construct
going. That's not to say that they're aware
of this. But I simply said never has
the 2 party illusion been so exposed.
Do not let these major partisan influencers convince
you that falling back into the partisan line
is the answer. That's what they're all trying
to do right now coming up to the
election. A vote for the left or right
is a vote for maintaining the Zionist controlled
status quo.
Here's what he said. It's insane. Do you
think America needs that today? What? Debt. Just
going through that whole Israel thing today.
I mean,
do we need it? You mean the truth,
Patrick?
Do we need the truth?
Is that a journalist talking? I'm I'm confused.
Let's let's listen to that again. Think America
needs that today.
What? That. Just going through that whole Israel
thing today.
I mean Right. So discussing the reality of
Israel.
Right. We don't need that right now. It's
you know, this is what we get from
the partisan game.
You know, don't don't vote your conscience. Don't
vote for them. You that's gonna hurt everything.
Just do it next time, or just ignore
it in general and just vol into line.
It's always that pressure that you're the one
ruining the party somehow.
Of course, we need that right now because
it's the truth. Because we need to understand
what it is, what it's doing. It's the
chief ally, we're told. All of our funding
and all of our manip I mean, all
the history.
All of the things like the USS Liberty,
and all the different examples of how they
are we are being lied to, manipulated,
abused
as the people, as our government facilitated for
a foreign government. That is something we need
to put off until we're ready for it?
Come on, man. This is the kind of
stuff that we need to
just to call out for what it is.
And
do we need it? I think we do
need it. Okay. I think I think we
have to have How do you think the
left feels about it today? Of course, they
they any anything that's having us fighting with
each other is obviously huge. Got it. Now
just to be clear, I'm you know my
thinking about I hate these these yeah. I
just made my opinion clear about what we're
dealing with. It's a government. And, yes, they've
got different opinions and varying objectives and individual,
but and they identify, in many cases, as
these different parties, but it's your government at
the end of the day. And they laugh
at you when you use these kind of
device. But the ultimate point is that point
applies either way. Of course,
of course, anything that gets them battling again,
there's 2 ways to look at it. If
you think your vote translates, which I don't,
then that would make sense. That they anything
that can get them to win because the
immediate point of the power they gain from
being in the position, of course, that matters.
But I if you don't look at the
vote part of it, just simply the idea
of the the the perception of being in
control, the idea of hurting the other side,
the point, the wind you gain from that,
the momentum, the funding from power entities like
Israel or lobbying groups that want you to
you know, see my point? Like, that stuff
matters. And so if he's saying, talking about
Israel, for example, right, having the discussion around
what's going on, what do you think that
how does that the left think about that?
Well, right now, it's hurting both of them.
Right? Both of them. We're talking about not
the peoples, right, but the government entities. Both
sides
are actively fighting for, endorsing, funding, arming Israel.
So that's the reality. But when you kinda
water it down to the idea of the
people on the streets and say, what does
that do for the left? Of course, it's
all one thing.
If the if you see the other side
fighting and you feel like that's helping your,
momentum, then, yeah, you're gonna say good. But
same thing you see from the other side.
Both sides would actually do that. But the
point is to think about the power structure,
not the average person on the street that
identifies with the illusion.
So so the left's gonna use this big
time. And that's why they wrote an article
titled what?
Far right influencers
talking about guys like you Yep. Turn against
turn against Trump campaign.
I don't even know how that connects, by
the way. I read the article and it
says it says far right influencers turn against
Trump campaign. And you read it and there's
valid points we made. Right? This is and
by the way, there is a clear schism
right now of people that are very aware
that what they're that they they they are
Republicans and that they believe in a lot
of the same things. They're fine, but they
see through what Trump is doing or they
see his support for Israel, whatever it is.
So why that is something about Israel and
the left helping the left? Like, again, at
this what this all comes down to is
that political moves only matter if they benefit
the party.
Right? So what what if he's what if
he believes he that's he's acting with his
conscience?
Right? That I believe Trump isn't the guy.
So are you suggesting that I should ignore
that because that helps the left? Yes. That's
basically what he's saying. This is guys, this
is
level 1 pow this is like the remedial
aspect of this.
This is what makes the power structure laugh,
that we're ignoring what we believe
because, well, we gotta win when they know
it's all them and they're tricking. I mean,
it's crazy to me. This is remedial stuff.
And that's a WAPO story.
Who does that help? The left, obviously. Who
does that hurt? The right, Trump. So when
November 5th comes
and Kamala's president, remember these days. Mhmm. Ah,
okay. So you did it. It's your fault.
How dare you have something you believe in
because you're you gave it to the left.
That's our political system. We should all be
embarrassed that this is the level of the
high the high level political conversation that you
should ignore
what you think and how you feel and
what you believe should make a pie because,
well, we can't let the other side. This
is what Sam and I will talk about
in the interview I'll play tomorrow.
The idea that literally the system has devolved
into this ridiculous concept that, well, I have
I have to grudgingly vote democrat because I
just don't want a republican, or I have
to grudgingly vote for the republican because I
just don't want a democrat. And that is
the whole sum of the entire conversation.
It literally has nothing. I mean, you could
remove all the policy. It doesn't even matter
because they're ignoring what they believe in because
the other side is so bad. That is
it. I I mean, listen to their rhetoric.
Listen to their speeches. It's 95%
how bad the other side is. That's all
it is.
And honestly, I think a lot of people
are ups irritated by it. Like, they see
it because I don't think the American population
are as stupid as they like to think
we are.
Call it out.
Ridicule.
This deserves to be laughed at. Just letting
you know, when November 5th comes
and all of these guys,
when your your
your and and by the way, I trust
me. You're gonna get swamped with support and
messages today.
You're gonna be swamped with messages of support
today. Swamped.
Vinny, you're the only guy. You're this, and
you're that, and you're this, and you're great.
Yeah. When that happens,
they're not sitting there matching your number one,
which your number one is Trump winning. Mhmm.
Their number one is their their,
hate and dislike for Israel.
That's their See, how what what a ridiculously
dishonest framing. This guy just flat out doesn't
understand the conversation.
Right? I mean, this this is the point
about any other things we've seen before where
he says things that are absurd.
That clearly shows you he just doesn't understand.
Like he just got called out for saying
that we've all seen those videos of Hamas
raping people.
There was a whole even Twitter, whole community
notes was like, that's not true. Because he
because he's just just going along with the
crowd conversation that we've all seen that. No.
We haven't because it doesn't exist, man. It's
not there. It's not real. They lied about
it. That's the the general narrative. And, you
know, a lot of these people, it's easy
to do that. To just kinda lean into
the general conversation because a lot of times
you just get by because the rest of
them go, yeah. It is true. It's not
there. It's not true. So to frame this
as they just are obsessed with their hate
for Israel, how about they're obsessed or concerned
about the murdering of children, the starvation of
families, the destruction of an entire civilization, the
ongoing ethnic cleansing? Right? What about all that?
What about the using US money and bombs
to murder people in the name of the
United States or the name of something, I
mean, unreal? Or how about just the idea
that they're fighting for Palestinian self determination?
But, you know, they all just hate Israel.
It's as simple as that. That is a
lie and is designed to do exactly what
we've already been discussing,
to drive you back into a binary choice.
Number 1.
You you have to kinda pick and choose
which one's gonna be your number 1. Of
course. Because that's all it is, guys. 1
or 2. Left to right. Up and down.
That's it. That's all you get. Two choices
and you're done. Go back to sleep, and
I'll see you in 4 years.
That's the grown up conversation? Really?
If your number one is America first,
this isn't America first. Ah, and there it
is. Right. So if you do something that
is not in the interest of Israel, that's
not America first. Understand?
It's not an America first,
position you're making.
Everybody has their own individual
choices that they make, but your choices will
have
a direct impact.
Wow.
And he really is getting kind of called
out for that across the Internet right now.
I mean, that's that's the guy saying right
here. Pat Patrick b David says not being
pro Israel is not America first. It is
a crazy thing to say. Honestly, I kinda
don't think he it just kinda fell out
of his mouth. That's what he thinks. He
didn't really say it explicitly like that, but
that's what it means. I'm sure he probably
regrets it at this point. But
that's what he that's what he's driving, and
a lot of them are.
And as I said, never has the 2
party illusion been so exposed.
Now it's not just about the Zionism influence,
but it is the reality of this problem.
We we live in a situation where we've
got a bunch of piranhas just willing just,
like, waiting for anybody. Buy me off.
Influence me. Give me money, and I'll vote
for you. You're not talking about the politicians
or rather vote in your interest.
And yet Zionism has clearly filled that role.
And I mean, it could be arguably that
that wasn't the case until they turned that
into the reality, manipulating our political process. But
either way, that's where we are now. So
if you just pull out the Zionist influence,
I'm sure they'd fall into the next person
giving them money. Yeah. I know I have
a very low opinion of these people, but
I think I'm right. But I hope I'm
wrong. Bottom line is, it's exposed.
They are trying to do whatever they can
to maintain their fraudulent system because they benefit
from it. As always, who benefits?
Afshin Rezani
from going underground
highlights what Trump just said.
When I'm back in the White House, the
United States will stand with Israel all the
way, 100%, without hesitation, without qualification,
and We'll stand with Israel 100%. Without qualification.
So again, just like we saw I I
made fun of Federman when he said that.
There's a reason he asked to say that.
Because there's no way any logical person would
say it. So you mean if they bomb
a country with a nuclear bomb, it doesn't
matter? Pair based on? Cause the argument would
be, nah, nah, he it's not what he
meant. Well, how do you know what he
meant? Words have meaning.
All we can do is listen to the
words and apply the meaning of the words.
That means that there's no qualification.
So there is nothing that would change that
support. I mean, that's what he's explicitly saying.
He says it in 3 different ways.
So what that means is we don't care
they're committing genocide. We don't care. And Kamala,
I'll show you, says the same thing. We
don't care. Unequivocal
support. No matter what. They'll defend themselves forever
and we support them. All of them are
doing that. All of them are pandering to
a foreign government to get themselves in power.
Does that make you think that your votes
make a difference?
If they were considered about if they thought
your vote made the difference, they would not
be pandering primarily to something that was what
most Americans are against.
Think about that for a second. The 2
leading candidates are primarily talking about the idea
of Israel in these conversations
and supporting them blindly.
Most Americans do not support what's going on.
So are they pandering for your vote, or
are they pandering to the person deciding who
puts them in power
or the entity?
All the way, 100%, without hesitation, without qualification,
and without any apology, we're not gonna be
apologizing.
We won't be apologizing.
We're not gonna be apologizing. Besides, this is
a fight between civilization and savagery.
Of course. Civil civilization and savagery, you know.
And of course, the savages are not the
one promoting rape, making telling argument should be
system system systemic or systematic.
Right? The the are the savage are not
the ones apparently bombing and starving children or
as we'll show you in a moment, aiming
and shooting and sniping babies and infants with
2 bulls to the head, smashing and demolishing,
laughing about the suffering. Those aren't the savages
apparently. He's talking about the other group which
is funded by Israel though, Hamas. But either
way or rather his general point is that
we're talking about all the other people in
the Middle East, however you wanna take it.
It's always good and evil, savages and the
and the the whatever. It is a disgusting
conversation
where he's trying to it's it's everything comes
down to this binary illusion.
It's never that simple. And obviously, the reality
is the person in the group he's supporting
are the ones committing,
I mean, the most vivid real time, provable
examples of everything we always thought we were
fighting that I've ever seen in my life.
Every single thing they're showing every day. Right
now, I can break off right now and
check the current information right now and I
can prove to you there'll be a massacre.
Children dying, starving,
arms and heads and legs blown off. I'm
not just making this up. I see it
every single time I tap into the conversation.
New things.
It kills me.
It kills me, on a personal note, that
I feel like I'm not doing enough to
stop that from happening. I know that's not
the case, but it's expressing a a, you
know, moment of how I feel about that.
I the problem is that I feel like
we just
you just you can't deal with the suffering
anyway.
It's it's hard. It's really hard to continue
to pretend like that
we have enough evidence in front of us
to show all of it. Anyway, I just
it just it it really upsets me that
we can't, as a society,
stand back and say, we don't care what
these screaming partisan people are saying.
We're watching them murder children. I mean, it
just kills me.
Between decency and depravity
and between good and evil. Yeah. So decency
and depravity, good and evil, it's the same
thing going back to Bush, through Biden. They
all say the same thing. You know? Kamala,
by the way, said the exact same thing.
Comparison between a group that worships death and
a group that cherishes life. Right. A group
that worships death. So you can either argue
he's talking about Hamas, which Israel funded right
up until October 7th, easy to prove. Or
that he's talking about just the larger conversation
of what Palestinians, the Middle East. I mean,
either any way you frame it. It's either
disgustingly insulting or Israel funds that.
Cherishes our nation. Every single life that is
lost in this conflict is on the shoulders
of Hamas.
Hamas alone. Hamas alone. Hamas alone. Hamas alone.
Not the 75 years of brutal occupation oppression,
starvation,
rape, murder, pillaging, the ongoing settler occupations that
have been illegal every moment they've ever been
done. None of that. It's all Hamas' fault
for resisting.
And then some of them committing crimes, which
we should hold accountable for. But in the
process, IDF killed many of their own people.
But we don't talk about that. It's all
on the shoulders of the group that also
Israel funded into power. But, you know, let's
not talk about that. And I think you
have to really add in the word Iran.
Iran. Of course, because he's gotta throw in
the Iran conversation because Israel's desperate to make
that the conversation,
but there's no evidence in any shape one
there's nothing that backs up the idea that
Hamas is acting under the orders of Iran.
It's not the reality. I think we can
prove that. Iran supports what they're doing for
sure. I would be I'd be will willing
to argue. They probably, if they could, would
send them weapons or maybe they are. Like,
the United States send weapons all over the
world to some of the most
dangerous people on the planet.
Bottom line, he's saying that because it's politically
advantageous to the group that is clearly funding
him. Don't wanna talk about it.
There can be no sympathy, no excuses, and
no excuses, and no escape from these monsters,
and we will,
we will do what has to be done.
We had Joe Biden's people first act, one
of the worst messages I've ever seen sent
out to bad people. After more than 1,400
innocents, including all the 40 Americans who were
murdered, kidnapped. Oh, Oh, so now so he
now he's saying 1400?
So so he's he can't even so not
not even 1200 is accurate anymore. That got
rolled back to the the it's what? 1,100
and something?
That's that's the official information.
But then on top of that, we know
that half of them, if not more, were
killed by the IDF. Many of which I
mean, this is just absurd that these narratives
keep getting pushed.
Or the rape conversation, or the burned babies,
or the beheaded babies. They they literally keep
saying these things because what else?
They are the the point is these people
have already become aware that they've lost control
of the conversation.
It's as simple as that. So they just
double down. They keep moving forward. And if
we just don't do anything about it, they'll
just keep going.
Well, we can scream all day over here,
but they're gonna go, well, they're not doing
anything.
So let's just throw go through to the
fake election, let's change the narrative, let's throw
them a bunch of distraction stories, and maybe
they'll just ignore it. Maybe they and maybe
we'll end up ignoring it. That's what I
think is happening. You can't just keep lying
with how much is out there.
Right? I mean, they are. My point is
that it's amazing that we, as a society,
do not reject this from the start.
Including all the 40 Americans who were murdered,
kidnapped,
and, think of this. We
immediately announced that we're giving Hamas $100,000,000.
We're gonna give it to only to god.
No. So I can't even I can't even
stop like this. I mean, guys, the point
is that Trump is uninformed or he's lying
to you. It's just lazy. It's like saying
Hamas protest. They're not Hamas protest. Like, it's
just if we can't ignite engage with the
even of the smallest level, an honest conversation,
Call them pro you know, call them pro
Palestinian protesters and then go on to tell
us why it's bad. To just blatantly
misrepresent it is lazy, and it shows you
that you know that they're not what you
say they are. But you see, people are
not doing this because they care about one
side, it's because they are picked aside.
I mean, it's it's like we're battling against
this very small minority
of the entire conversation, but it's being presented
as everything.
And the point is we're all yelling at
one side or the other going, look at
this. Look at the facts. And they're like,
just get out of our face. We're not
even here for the facts. We're just trying
to win.
That's all the people we see right now.
It's everything he's saying. This guy I mean,
if you look at videos of him, I
saw one going around of him with Oprah
from, like, the nineties, the eighties, it's he's
another person.
He's measured, he's intelligent sounding, he's kinda just
very calm, he's doesn't have the boisterous person
he is today. But I'm telling you guys,
he is a character.
Like, whether it's the reality TV or whatever
we're talking about, he is playing a role.
I just it's hard not to see that
when you look at the way he's acting
in the past.
In any case,
he says, if I'm back in the White
House, the US will stand with Israel 100%
without hesitation. He says the choice in November,
liberal genocide with feigned concern or conservative, unconcerned
genocide of Palestinians.
Same point we're making. Now I'll just include
this clip because it's important to see before
we go on to the democrat convention and
all that. But listen to this. I mean,
I'm still increasingly blown away
by how many people
look at the comment. That's not what he
says. I mean, guys, just so it's clear,
it is verbatim.
Here are clips from Trump's recent campaign trail
event where he openly states that Israel used
to control the US Congress,
And he says that it will again when
he's president.
This is not up for debate. It's I'll
I'll play the one that's undeniable. The other
2 are different say the same thing, but
in different ways. The third clip is explicit.
He says it twice,
and yet people still go, that's not what
he said. Either because they don't wanna believe
it or they don't even listen or they
don't wanna hear it. Either way,
if you are not blown away by the
fact that Trump in multiple different points at
this point, at least 4
oops.
Hit the button on accident. At least 3
or 4 different times I've seen it where
he explicitly repeats the fact that congress used
to be controlled by Israel and it will
again. And and he says, rightly so, in
the clip I'm gonna play.
Or in the other ones, he talks about
the fact that he kinda says the same
thing in this third clip, but the other
2, he says very clearly.
If that when that was the case,
the AOCs and the rest would have never
gotten elected.
You know you hear the same thing. He
just explicitly
made clear that when Israel or if, as
we see they still are, in control,
that they wouldn't allow you to vote people
into power, if you even believe that's what's
going on. That's exactly what that says. And
it's AIPAC he's talking about, that they had
the strongest lobby and that they wouldn't have
allowed that.
So much for
democracy. But the point is that the people
playing this game don't care. I'm trying to
reach those of you that do. Here's the
clip that you cannot deny. It's on a
radio show. And if you wanna watch the
other 2 where he's speaking at that last
podium,
please do. You know, the biggest change I've
seen in congress is Israel
literally owned the congress. You understand that 10
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And I think you know exactly what
I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power,
and rightfully,
over congress. You know,
Israel was the most powerful lobby
in the country 15 years ago.
Today, between Tlaib and AOC and all of
these people, what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. And he also says, again, these
other ones, ultimately, that they wouldn't be elected
if if and when that was the case,
like I just
said. Unbelievable.
And here's Miriam Adelson going over all the
different information where Trump gave Israel what they
wanted even though it was all legal.
Now as I just recently said,
this before what we're gonna get into next,
before RFK's point today, I said if both
RFK and Elon end up in Trump's administration,
which seems to be what's happening, may well,
but yet yet to fully flesh out, I'll
be convinced that this was always the plan.
That's my opinion.
Either way, we're pretty screwed with what it
will create. And I want you to think
about this.
Those that aren't part of this are just
seemingly don't want to or incapable of seeing
it. But those that can see the alarming
kind of cult mentality around any political side
today. Whether it's Kamala, which is very alarming.
This this game where these people, I'll I'll
read a I'll read a tweet about it.
We're just this this woman goes from being
like the most unpopular thing in any political
conversation to being somehow like a a hero
of the left. It's, it's scary. And it's
not just that that's the narrative. You look
at these, these people are like crying
like it's Elvis, like it's crazy to me.
How does that happen?
This is the problem, and it's on all
sides of this. Right now, the problem is
that there's clearly more willingness to lean into
this right now from and, also,
I bet definitely think Trump is the selection,
and that Kamala being put there is the
obvious counterbalance
to drive that support. So it's kinda why
I'm focusing more on the right in this,
but, clearly, the point is it's just your
government. Not the right of it, but your
government, and that's their choice. But you decide
what you want. That's the important part. The
point is that we see that
dangerous
cult mentality.
All of them.
Now think about my point
with what will be created when the 3
most worshiped political figures today.
And I think that's very clearly, Elon, RFK,
and Trump,
when they merge their sycophant followers into one
obsessive hero worshiping blob.
I mean, I'm I'm a little bit concerned
about how how, I mean, insurmountable that would
be. And that's again, that's the political move.
It's not about policy. It's not about anything
other than winning.
And that worries the hell out of me.
And he tweeted this, I'm willing to serve.
And the point that come it's a real
conversation. Trump said, yes. That that would if
he wants to take it, we'll probably give
it to he didn't say they would. But
he said, it's, you know, as he always
kind of that likely will be the case,
whatever he said. Paraphrasing. But it seems they
both acknowledge that it's something.
Now, today,
first, this was released RK junior stated in
a Pennsylvania court filing that he will endorse
Trump. And then he recently just spoke. So
listen to what he had to say. And
I've got a lot of points here. Casey
writes the one that shared this.
60 And and by the way, there was
a whole speech. I think this is just
a clip of the part where we're gonna
discuss today. Months ago in April of 2023,
I launched my campaign for president of the
United States.
I began this journey as a Democrat, the
party of my father and my uncle,
the party which I pledge my own allegiance
to long before I was old enough to
vote.
I attended my 1st
democratic convention at the age of 6 in
1960.
And back then, the democrats were the champions
of the constitution
of civil rights.
The democrats stood against authoritarianism,
against censorship,
against colonialism,
imperialism,
and unjust wars.
Now, obviously, I wasn't as politically active or
all at that point
or or, you know, alive. The point is,
I don't know if I believe that. Just
wanna make that clear.
I've tend to think I mean, it's certainly
possible that things had some kind of a
dramatic shift at some point, then that's where
we are now. But it's hard for me
not to think that this has sort of
always been the game. And the idea that
they, you know, they used to be the
one, and now I'm gonna go this way
because they're the one, which is kind of
the point. I don't I just don't believe
that. I think it's always been your government
and it's always been it doesn't it doesn't
mean it's maybe at some level there were
people that really cared. I mean, there's does
seem to be some examples of people involved,
like a Massey, for example, that he continues
to seem to be on the right side
of things. But I just I'm I'm just
too jaded to ever just buy into that.
I just don't think I ever will again,
quite frankly.
But I just don't know if I believe
that's the case. But anyway, you can see
how this is sort of being set up
that way. Right? Like, this is the kind
of a Pied Piper situation, like I said
about Elon. You're basically saying, you know, well,
look, follow me, guys. This is the direction.
I know it's grudgingly. I know you don't
like the republican. I know you're lying to
Trump, but, you know, this is the way.
To me, this is a wholesale selling out
of the movement they created.
We were the party of labor,
of the working class.
The democrats were the party of government transparency
and the champion
of the environment.
Our party was a bull work against big
money interests and corporate power.
True to its name, it was the party
of democracy.
As you know, I left that party in
October because
it had departed so dramatically
from the core values that I grew up
with.
It'll become the party of war,
censorship,
corruption,
big pharma,
big tech,
big ag,
and big money.
Wanted to abandon democracy
by canceling the primary
to conceal
the cognitive decline of the sitting president.
You see, here's the problem,
guys. I mean, think about this.
What he's saying
is that ultimate
the democrat party was only that part be
you know, or the again, it's all of
them. The only reason that's clear is because
they were the one in in the White
House.
Listen. If you can't see how anybody in
that position ultimately continues the wars, continues the
big pharma push, I mean, they it's just
because narrative shifts. Look at the past.
Look at the different administrations and look at
the linear rise of all the same problems
that doesn't go down and then it's just
the continuation of the same big pharma, big
ag, big it's all the same stuff.
They have different talking points, but all of
these same things have continued to increase. And
so the problem
is that by framing it as, like, they
just became that well, no. If when the
Republicans are there, the same things so look
at Trump's administration. Operation war speeds, all the
same stuff. So, frankly, I don't believe that
he even thinks that. But then what did
he say after that again? It was, Wanted
to abandon democracy by canceling the primary
to con CEO. Okay. But here's the problem.
Is this new?
What what about Debbie Wasserman Schultz and I,
was it,
2012
or whatever whichever one it was where she
basically got or they later, during the court
process, had to admit.
That's the whole cigars in back rooms kind
of thing where they just get to pick
what they want regardless of what people say
or vote for.
Yeah. That already happened.
So the point is that we already know
this. Just because that one was seen does
not mean that they, behind the scenes, already
knew that that's the way it went. So
this game like, this I have a real
big issue right now, people even calling that
a coup. I'm not gonna say it's honest.
I think all these people cheat all the
time.
But the game,
a coup is what they're trying to do
in Venezuela. A coup is what they've done
in foreign countries all around the world. That's
a coup. Bloody and harmful.
The point is here,
you've got people involved with a political shift
like a like a musical chairs dynamic. And,
yes, they didn't allow people to vote for
the primary, but but can we know that
doesn't even matter? Frankly, I don't think your
vote matters in any context with the way
the system is built. But to to frame
that as that was the kind of the
shining moment of shit, no. That's just something
that got seen and I honestly argue shown
to you, but you guys can decide for
yourselves.
The cognitive decline of the sitting president.
Which again, are we really pretending like that
was some kind of a
like, it wasn't some kind of an accident.
It's obvious that that was a coordinated plan.
Right? That he wasn't you see now they
all we all knew it was. I mean,
it was a very transparent move. And, again,
if you really stand back,
look at where it all drives. Everything that
has happened has continued to drive people in
the direction of Trump.
It's my opinion, and it could just be
because they're that bad. I get that. But
think about it. I left the party to
run as an independent.
The mainstream
of American politics and journalism
derided my decision.
God. I if he would have only actually
done that. I mean, like, legitimately run independent
from the beginning
without concern for what they tell you won't
work.
I'm telling you guys, that's what we actually
need. It's some kind of a long term
consistent, un
not not influenced by that other party dynamic
just to continue to push. If he would've
run for this, even if he would've failed
this time, and I'll get into this more
in a second with what he says,
the momentum wouldn't have been lost.
Instead, you are now diffusing,
dissolving that that momentum
because most I mean, half the people that
were already all try
they're kind of,
you know, jazzed up about him running, which
they just got massively deflated because they don't
wanna vote for Trump. That's the whole point.
Some of them will and I think that's
the larger point. He is driving them over
here now. And I think that's just it's
it's insulting almost. And I just don't I
don't think that this is in any way,
shape, or form what you do if you
want to change the system. This is maintaining
the system. Even if you come to the
conclusion that's the only way you could have
actually seen any kind of political effect,
You're still going well then the outcome is
more important than my principles?
I just don't agree with that. I don't
think anybody should. That seems crazy. Conventional wisdom
said that it would be impossible even to
get on the ballot
as an independent because each state poses an
insurmountable tangle
of arbitrary rules for collecting signatures. He's right.
And that's exactly the point. It's set up
in a way that makes sure that this
is not possible.
But so your argument is to and which,
by the way, they already knew that they
informed of this right in the beginning.
The argument is to kind of go through
the motions until this point and then just
dump into Trump. I mean, how so if
you knew this, then you saw this as
the outcome. Unless I mean, my point is
unless you kind of hope that more would
I mean, I I I don't wanna assume
that it's all planned. I don't know that.
But at the end of the day, what
you're highlighting is something that you already knew
from the start.
And the idea is that you're you're saying
because each state poses That ultimately because of
the intertangling of all these manipulations and you
have
to get all these, as he says, millions
of votes, that you shouldn't
I guess the same point is be from
before, is that if you just go through
this process and continue to show people the
broken system, maybe we can change that system.
Maybe you won't win. Maybe you won't have
any effect on the political outcome, but you
can change people's minds about the system.
This is my point about acknowledging the problem.
What he's doing is hiding the problem. It's
it's making it seem as if this is
the solution to the problem.
No. The problem is what's forcing him to
do this or whether he was forced or
not is a question, but that's what it
is being presented as. An insurmountable
tangle
of arbitrary rules for collecting signatures.
I would need over a 1,000,000 signatures, something
no presidential candidate in history had ever achieved.
And then I need a team of attorneys
and 1,000,000 of dollars
to handle all the legal challenges from the
DNC.
Which
is which is crazy, by the way. I
mean, the idea like, the point being that
then he would have to fight off them
challenging him legally. Like, does how do you
not see that as a completely broken system?
And then why would you lean in with
that system?
The DNC and the RNC,
they're different, but they're the same thing.
They are the gatekeepers of this broken system.
The naysayers told us that we were climbing
a glass version of Mount Impossible.
So the first thing I wanna tell you
is that we proved them wrong.
We did it because beneath the radar of
mainstream media organs,
we inspired a massive independent political movement.
Yes. You did.
But how in the world do you think
that's gonna continue when you
endorse the person that that system is rose
up against?
The momentum was risen up against the system.
It's just it's it's amazing to me that
this whole sentiment, everything about this is selling
out what you built. Just like with Bernie
and Clinton,
it's the same thing. Like, if you're feeling
that same frustration, you should. It's the same
thing.
More than a 100,000 volunteers sprang into action,
hopeful that they could reverse our nation's decline.
Many work 10 hour days, sometimes in blizzards
and plays a heat. For nothing, apparently.
I'm sorry to say it. But ultimately, if
the outcome is falling in line with 1
of the 2 chosen candidates, you did it
for nothing. Like, I mean, look. I I
hope that somehow they can
carry this over into whoever actually runs Independent
next.
But you know how much
easier that would've been if he would've just
stuck this out, ran independent,
made this his talking point?
You know, he did the the side debate
sort of thing. I was I'm sure you
guys saw where he sort of, like, he
did his his own version where he responded.
Do that.
Continue to do that the entire way through.
How about if you kept doing that all
4 years? Here's what I woulda done if
I was elected instead of the 2 party
paradigm. If somebody actually stayed the course,
you know as well as I listening that
we could change the system
because people want that. That's evident by everything
we see from the largest voting block being
independent,
or rather the largest voting block being people
that don't even vote, and the logic voting
block of people that do being independent. I
mean, what else do you need to see?
And yet, here he is driving you into
the 2 party system, which is the slight
minority,
the large minority of the whole system itself.
But that's the way it works. It's the
best system we got apparently. A sacrifice, family
time,
personal commitments, and sleep month after month, energized
by a shared vision of a nation,
healed of its divisions.
Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. A nation that that's the
a vision that you were projecting.
Can you imagine how they feel now?
Do you think that they think that Trump
or Biden are going to build that? That's
exactly why you were popular. They set up
tables at churches and farmers markets.
They canvassed door to door.
In Utah and in New Hampshire, volunteers collected
signatures
in snowstorms,
convincing each supporter to stop in the frigid
cold,
take off their gloves, and decide legibly.
During a heatwave in Nevada, I met a
tall athletic volunteer
who cheerfully told me that he had lost
£25
collecting signatures
in a 117 degree heat.
To finance this effort, young Americans donated their
lunch money,
and senior citizens
gave up their part of their Social Security
checks. Yeah. Which now all amounts to Trump,
apparently.
You know? Like, I I I want to
believe that this may you know, maybe just
to be clear, it's certainly possible that he
just genuinely thinks this is the right move.
But I just don't know how that can
be the logical step.
Like, what what amount of of of of,
you know,
I I who out there is convincing him
if that is the case, that this is
in any way in the benefit of what
he's talking about?
I mean, please, if I'm missing something, tell
me in the chat. I just and I
don't see the connection in any way to
out he's laying out all these people that
struggle through the heat and the cold to
collect lunch money, to make this all possible,
to make what possible?
Trump winning?
I it just doesn't make any sense to
me. They they don't need that. They've got
billions coming from all sorts of Zionist and
lobbies and all over
I just don't get it. I don't get
it. I mean, again, I think you all
I think you
unless there's some other answer, I think the
obvious answer here is that this was always
the plan. I'm not saying that is the
evidence we can prove, but I think that's
the most logical outcome here. Otherwise,
I just don't see how you can argue
he thinks this is in the interest of
what he's describing right now. Our 50 state
organization
collected those millions of signatures and more. No
presidential campaign in his political American political history
has ever done that.
And so I wanna thank all of those
dedicated volunteers and congratulate
the campaign staff
who coordinated
this enormous logistical feat.
Your accomplishments
were regarded as impossible.
You carried me up that glass mountain.
You pulled off a miracle.
You achieved what all the continent said could
never be done.
You have my deepest gratitude,
and I'm never gonna forget that. I mean,
couldn't you also say that he owes them
the the to see this through?
I mean, with everything he's saying, like, wouldn't
you feel obligated to see it through, which
is what they want? They didn't do all
of that for you to lee to lean
into somebody else.
Again, whether you think that's the right move
or not. Like, I feel like this is
absolutely,
like, objectively
tarnishing what they did. Like, you're you're you're
not honoring the faith they put in you.
I mean, I'm saying that directly from the
heart. Like, there's just no way that that
lines up to me.
Not just for what you did for my
campaign,
but for the sacrifices
you made
because you love our country.
You showed everyone that democracy is still possible
here. How does that possibly make sense?
How is it that how does this show
that? If they're all the support you're highlighting
that went to you that you then dump
into somebody else shows democracy?
Again, is that I mean, who this this
is a hostage video, apparently.
Right? Like, how do you possibly make sense
of that?
This is the opposite of democracy. This is
the broken system that we're forced to fall
into. Because what else am I gonna do?
Yeah. It really rings like democracy. Right? And,
again, you know my opinions on mob rule
in general. I'm just saying making the count
the counterpoint,
you know, a representative government, call whatever you
want. That's not what this looks like to
me. Used to survive in the press and
in the idealistic human energies
that still thrive beneath the canvas of neglect
and of official and institutional
corruption.
Today, I'm here to tell you that I
will not let
allow your efforts to go to waste.
I'm here to tell you that I will
leverage your tremendous accomplishments
to serve the ideals that we share. The
ideals of peace,
of prosperity,
of Peace. Peace and prosperity.
You know where this is going. Does Trump
represent peace and prosperity?
No. He represents might might makes right.
That's I mean, that's basically might be might
as well be their campaign
line.
Freedom
of health. All the ideas. Freedom of health?
Freedom of health. You mean mister operation warp
speed who still promotes the injection that you
tell us kills people because it does?
Again, I I just flat out don't believe
this.
You you could argue he's doing this because
he might rationalize it's the best thing for
this the country, which is always how they
frame this, but this is a challenge. This
is a bastardization
of what he says he's for.
Who can support that?
Deals that motivated my campaign.
I mean, here's a describe the path forward
that you've opened with your commitment
and with your hard labors.
Sad.
Very sad.
Yes. And as far as I understand that
he has endorsed Trump entirely publicly. So the
bottom line
is this to me, guys, is
it's just it's it's showing you everything wrong
with this system.
I real I just like I did with
Olsen Gabbard, for example. They they they present
well, they have a lot of good things
to say, I really want to believe it.
This is why I'm so jaded in this
system. Because I am let down every single
even though I've I've never really leaned in
because I'm like, I just don't believe it.
And still I let down. I still because
like I said, I always want that to
be the case. I want to believe that
they will make a difference here.
So as Derek Derek Bros had a couple
of statements I wanted to share with you
that I thought were interesting.
If RFK Junior chooses to endorse Trump, it
will prove and he put this out earlier
on 20th. It it will prove he is
a sellout.
Another pied piper meant to get people's hopes
up for a big letdown in the end.
But
since they are both Zionists, I guess it
makes sense.
And arguments about RFK's people uniting with MAGA
to, quote, defeat the communist, which again, the
idea is
yeah. It's just so embarrassing.
Again, Again, if you think any one of
the government structures are any more problematic, you're
blinding yourself to the history of the world.
Government can collect power at the top. Look
at what's happening in our country. No matter
what you call it.
But on top of that, based on every
metric we have, I mean, guys, these people
are clear authoritarian
capitalists.
That's what they are. Both of them. It's
embarrassing that we play this dumb game. That's
like both of them calling each other Nazis,
which is also happening.
It's it's it is they're playing to the
ignorance of most people or the willingness to
hate your neighbor. That's what this is.
But he says it's just more BS narrative
being fed to people who claim to love
liberty.
And, again, if you love liberty, then you
have to you would be willing to allow
people to have their beliefs.
Not say everyone except that belief because that
one leads to bad things. That that's just
lazy. It's lazy ideology.
It says this is the great inversion in
action.
The left is horrible. Trump is horrible. But
has convinced freedom lovers he is the only
thing standing in the way of communism.
Which, by the way, is a tactic that's
been used in this country
over and over and over.
And RFK Jr. May well, very well join
that bunch of criminals in a fake effort
to stop the left. Which is essentially what
he said. The DNC, how they've changed. Right?
He says, then the right and health freedom
movement will be led right into the technocratic
state under Trump, which is the converging problems
that I see.
Right? The the side of the peep the
people that were most pushing back against the
COVID 19 illusion and the great reset around
it
are the ones being played using all these
right wing talking. The Save Act and pro
and digital ID, the Trojan horse that it
is, the border and the biometric controls. I
mean, it's all right there on the surface.
Peter Thiel and Palantir and Vance and Trump
and this kind of data mining of everything
you are. I mean, all of it.
Elon is the walking, talking great reset
representative, as far as I can see.
He also says this. This was today.
So RFK suspends his campaign, will remain on
the ballot in many states, but removes himself
from battleground states to endorse Trump. So that's
the weird thing about it. I don't know
how and so the endorsing him
and do it but leaving it on certain
I think there's a there's a poll there's
a strategy here
about how that will,
men in either hurt or manipulate the outcome
of votes in other states toward the Democratic
side of it. It says, I'm hoping the
principled RFK Jr. Supporters will say f that
and stick with your principles.
It's weird that we even have to make
that argument.
Like, do I need to convince people to
stand by what they believe in? Like, that
doesn't sound like what we pretend this all
is.
Even if you think that voting away from
these two people is not going to have
a win so is it are you only
doing this to win? Or are you doing
this because you wanna see change?
Doing this being voting or whatever else we're
talking about. Because if all you wanna do
is win, then sure. Pick 1 and pretend
like that's the game. But if you genuinely
want change,
or you want to believe in something and
fight for that, then do that.
That used to be what we pretended this
country was all about. We still do. But
it says this man claimed to be fighting
the 2 party system, and now he endorses
it.
Simple as that.
Then get this. Here's the defender from today.
Breaking. RFK Jr. Suspends presidential campaign. Will join
forces with Trump to, quote, save millions of
children.
Really?
Save millions of children? The guy is still
endorsing the injection that's being pushed on children.
I just it's sad. It's very sad. And
he says, can anyone take children's health defense
seriously after a headline like that?
Now he also added, this is today,
and this is about Trump.
When he says, when I encounter people who
still trust Trump,
I always whip out my 18 ways to
Trump serve the swamp article,
which is right here for TLav.
Make sure you include that.
And he says, while most don't even engage
with it, they can't debunk it, some will
respond. Well, of course, Trump put business people
in charge.
Ari, his point about Trump, White House giving
unparalleled access to Big Oil.
But these people fail to realize, he says,
that my criticism of Trump
and his relationship with Big Oil is not
some leftist climate change talking point.
No. Instead, what I'm pointing out is that
Trump continued the practice
of allowing the industry to capture regulators.
Yeah. That's obvious.
But it says not and this is what
RFK claims that, you know, that it's just
none of this stuff is real. We're being
lied to. It says not only that, but
so many people seem unaware
unaware is that is that the big oil
companies themselves who are funding and driving that
push towards the agenda 2030 because they know
it will benefit them financially and keep them
in control. That's this is it's the 2
party illusion of everything.
Act like they're one side or the other.
No. They're all working together to distill this
down to one very clear outcome using you
and the 2 party system.
Here's the article, by the way. It's a
great article from January 20th, 2021.
Here are 18 ways Trump supported the swamp
during his presidency. I'll give you Jimmy Doris
joke right there, where he said, Trump drained
the swamp and found his cabinet at the
bottom.
It's exactly. I mean, it's what we're watching,
guys.
Now,
Dave Smith said this, politics is all such
a fake religion and nothing demonstrates that more
than Kamala Harris. 6 weeks ago, nobody would
have pretended she was anything impressive, but now
she is a phenomenon rock star beacon of
joy. It really is embarrassingly stupid. These people
are in a cult and they worship the
machine. Now before you run with that as
a left point, he's making hear what he's
saying.
Politics
is a fake religion.
And he he he has just as many
points about the fake math the, you know,
the the lie, the movements around both.
There are people out there that are using
these things to keep you trapped in the
same thing we're showing you. The same old
hamster wheel that we've never left.
So think about this as we see this
happening on both sides. So let's step into
the left side of this conversation and show
you that it's the same thing. It is
the same cultish
lie that we tell ourselves to pretend that
we're having some kind of effect, when in
reality,
we should be
the American people should be the ones dictating
the outcome.
That's what we tell ourselves.
If we pretend that's happening, I've got a
vaccine to sell you.
A vaccine entirely.
Now, here's APAC
endorsing
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, or literally the vast majority
of Democrats and Republicans. But I wanna show
you this because the gain we're being told
from the right is that, well, they're all
radical maniacs who hate
Jews and are against Israel. Right? That's what
they oh, that's if you listen to any
of these political speeches, even from the underlings
talking about Trump's candidacy, they're all aiming at
the right as if they're like we keep
telling you, the entirety of the conversation is
about how the other side's worse, which shows
you the the whole game. That's how desperate
this all is. But then if we're being
told that the reason is because they're the
ones fighting against Israel, well, guess what? Israel
is supporting them just as much because they
don't care what side of the fake dynamic
is in control as long as they control
the dynamic. That's what we're dealing with. Congratulations
to APAC endorsed pro Israel champion,
Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Yeah. The one who openly
admit or, openly got forced to admit that
they just pick who they want in the
primary and they tell you what you yep.
Nothing new.
And it's all being endorsed by a foreign
country that's dictating your outcome.
Every single one of them. All I mean,
remember don't forget. I think it's, like, over
70% of every candidate is currently supported by
APAC. 97%
of who they supported last time won.
Think about how crazy that is. Now those
those add up because they they they it
changes who they're ultimately supporting year to year.
The point is that
overall, the current people in power, the vast
majority are supported by Israel.
Money that goes in their hands. But this
last push, the vast almost everyone they put
money into won.
How do we not see that for what
it is? How do we not see that
as a single thing and not a left
versus right dynamic?
Being pro Israel is good policy and good
politics, they say.
Certainly, parents it appears to be in this
broken, disgusting system. Well, here is Pelosi. Now
we're gonna get into the DNC overlap and
how ridiculous this all was.
I just you know, just a a massive
pro Israel dynamic even though every each side
is trying to claim the other side is
against Israel.
Here is her getting asked by a I
think it's a Palestinian
journalist
saying,
you know, why didn't you allow people with
Palestinian voices? Why didn't you allow, you know,
any like, it's just all the same questions
we've been hearing because they didn't know they
were they actually made they didn't allow anybody
to speak about Palestine. They didn't allow anybody
there to speak about it. Except they did
invite the parents of a detainee
from Israel, I think it might have been
the ones that were killed by Israel, by
the way,
to speak.
But don't nobody was in fact, they were
removing people from the crowd that simply had
Palestinian what garb on.
Crazy
stuff. That's how desperate they are to get
the to get Israel to be on their
side.
This is how she responds to this. And
I just want you to see, do you
think people like this are actually in power?
This woman can barely
you can barely understand through her mumbling what
she's actually saying.
That's because she's an old woman. And she's
very clearly like, we've seen this one after
another with Feinstein and McConnell and Biden
just constantly showing you that they are not
clear. I mean, we've talked about this a
long time ago. There's a there's a pharmacist
in the White House or just in congress
as well. And the bottom line is that
they will tell you,
and congress in particular is what I'm talking
about here, that they bring in it was
it was a a story got leaked about
how many geriatric, like, Alzheimer's drugs they have
on on
not on file, but, like, on, you know,
in there for them.
It's it's incredible.
They they're not allowed to tell you who,
though. I'm sure you can imagine.
But think about that. That means we have
people that are literally making massive choices, or
not, is the point. Who are
have Alzheimer's.
Or other levels of dementia, and they're taking
drugs for it. We've seen it. Like with
these people that'll lose, they don't even know
where they are anymore.
It's just so many examples of how we
are being manipulated.
Here's what she has to say about this.
And this is my point again, it's about
left and the right. All of them are
in this position while trying to tell you
that they're fighting each other when they're both
seemingly putting all in for Israel right now.
Qatar.
It was a Democratic party Oh, from Qatar.
That's what it was. From Qatar, not not
a Palestinian, but the point is she oh,
she makes a point about Qatar. I'll let
you listen. Serious about a ceasefire.
Why does it continue to send weapons
to kill only children and innocent
people in Gaza? So if you can't hear
his accent, he just said first question was,
if if you're wanting a ceasefire, why do
you keep sending weapons to kill children?
Very clear. Obviously, not something she'll answer. 2nd
question about uncommitted.
They ask for a space,
in the stage for
a Palestinian American voice. Why is the Democratic
Party didn't allow that? Why don't they allow
a space for a Palestinian American to speak
about what's going on?
I've been a cutter many times,
and I know that you like,
the,
ability
for whatever
the event is for the people to take
responsibility.
What?
I mean, god, just can we all just
collectively
fall out of our chairs? This person's in
control of something?
I mean, wait. It's not new. This is
probably one of the better times she has.
This woman clearly is not in control of
anything. And the bottom line is what she
said. I know Cutter people like from Cutter.
Oh, so everyone from Cutter likes the same
things? I mean, this is an old this
is somebody who is so far out of
touch, it's incredible.
For their presentation.
There were several people who spoke at this
convention.
So I don't my point, I don't even
know what that first statement meant. It had
no connection to what she says now, at
least not that I can see. Her point
is that there were other people here though
that could have spoken about it. That's actually
her answer. It's not his point was not
about whether somebody could have. Why didn't you
have, like, you brought on somebody, not a
politician, but the family members of a potential
detainee
to speak. We didn't bring anybody from the
other side of that comment. Why why is
that? This is actually the way she respond.
Them was the head of the United Auto
Workers,
a great and respected
labor leader in our country.
His union is calling even today,
for,
a ceasefire.
It's not what he said. He didn't say
why didn't you have anybody pro ceasefire. Said
why didn't you have Palestinian Americans? They're not
Palestinian.
They had the other side represented. They didn't
but the point is you're clearly pandering to
Israel. There's no question there.
He could have brought it up. Oh, he
could've.
That's his own personal choice, not what he
asked.
Alexandria
put
one of our members AOC You can't say
her name or she forgot. That's a good
sign. Known as AOC, very respected member of
congress,
advocating for what you advocated.
She could have spoken in her remarks
about this. Okay. But that's not the point.
He's not asking whether one of you who
are already present could've done it. Same point.
Again, I'm she probably knows this, the point
is just simply to distract and say, well
we did this, we could've done that. She's
she's putting the onus on everybody else, they
could've said something. That's a very immature thing
to do for a supposed leader.
And, who else? There are several other members
of congress who Bernie Sanders. He wanted all
of this. He could've spoken for He wanted
all those things that you're talking about and
stuff. Like, it's just like, you know what
he's talking about. This. We don't have
every nationality in our country
speak at a convention.
We have every cause that we want to
be represented where people represent. Oh, dear you.
Oh, okay. So exact so she just accidentally
admitted the whole point.
Yeah. We just didn't wanna represent that cause.
We have every cause that we wanted represented.
That's why we didn't have that. Oops.
I said, see somebody's
telling her what a bad mistake she made
right there. The bottom line is that you
don't we don't have everybody from every country.
Well, nobody's asking that, Pelosi. It's specifically about
whether you had a Palestinian American during the
largest conversation in the political sphere right now
around genocide in Gaza. Or the fact that
you had other people from the other side
of that conversation.
She just
She said because we didn't want to represent
that
agenda. We don't want to support Palestinians.
Those causes.
And we don't know that. But there's plenty
of opportunity
to express what you just expressed,
you just expressed now.
What's the first part of the question? I
honestly feel bad for her half the time.
Oh, what was that first part of the
question about killing babies and stuff?
And, of course, they don't let the white
peck on. Been very serious about a ceasefire.
And a lot of it under the leadership
of your prime minister. So the question was,
why do you keep giving them weapons if
you're serious about it? Not, are you serious
about it? Typical side step. I mean, these
people have been doing this their entire lives.
Cutter and I've met with him on number
of occasions
in Munich, in Washington
DC, and he's been a a great,
person to bring them
together. But we have been fought, Hamas has
not accepted. Lie. Let's just go back to
how this started, there was a ceasefire.
Lie. This time last year there was a
ceasefire.
Nope.
That's provably not the case. I mean, this
is just looking up on on
on Brave.
Based on the all available information, it's clear
there was no ceasefire in place on October
7th. I mean, this is just these are
the people that we have standing up acting
like they're in control.
It's it's it's she still says beheaded babies.
They still talk about blatant lies, talk about
rape. They're literally repeating the things that have
been collectively shown from Israeli media to be
false. I mean, there's articles that we talk
about all the time on the October 6th
that says the the deadliest year for children
in the West Bank.
Or you could show things the week before
where they were literally murdering and and killing
bombing certain areas. There was no ceasefire, but
you know why she says that? Because Israel
told her to say that or that somebody
said that's what Israel says. That's it. She's
lying.
That's the best she has. Hamas
violated the ceasefire
Nope. On October 7th. Nope. They broke the
ceasefire. Incorrect. We'd like to have a ceasefire
again.
We're waiting Except you veto it every time.
Right? I mean, I I frankly don't know
whether she even knows this. I don't think
she's informed on anything and that's the reality.
I think these people are that that might
very well be what she actually believes. It's
simply not the truth though as we'll go
over yet again today for the 14th time
about how obvious it is that they as,
again, as Israeli media is writing for you,
how Netanyahu has systematically
foiled these talks for his own interest. That's
haraz. I'll show you again today. Or the
bottom line that their own people are calling
this out, the reality of how they are
selling out their own people to maintain their
war for their own benefit. That's the Israeli
narrative right now. But here is an American
politician,
for some reason, lying to the American people
about what Israel wants her to say. No
weirdness there.
For them to agree to it. The United
States has used its leverage,
with, Netanyahu
for him to agree to the ceasefire.
The ball is in Hamas's court.
Yes, we are very serious about a ceasefire.
Oh, look at her trying to get tough
in the end. Yes, we are. Well, that
wasn't the question, Pelosi. It was about why
are you arming them if you are serious
about it. I think she just forgot about
that. Look at that face to end with,
maybe she's having a stroke.
So it's just embarrassing. I mean, again, these
people as much as in part sometimes I
feel bad because of how much they seem
to be strong, but, you know, they're these
are disgusting people. These are war criminals
who are gaslighting for a genocide,
so frankly I think they deserve to be
ridiculed.
But here's what Owen Jones said about the
Democratic National Convention. The DNC has refused to
allow a Palestinian to speak from a stage.
Again, realize that there are people that were
at they were part of their party who
were trying to make that happen, and they
would not let it happen. That's the story.
Even a vetted Palestinian speaker with a vetted
speech? Nope.
They because somebody,
IG, I wonder who, clearly
made sure that didn't happen.
Otherwise, why wouldn't they? I mean, it seems
like everywhere else in the conversation, they seem
to be really trying to at least give
the els the illusion
that they're, you know, at least aware of
the genocide because everybody sees it.
But it says the smallest gesture possible
to show the democratic leadership believes Palestinians are
human. Can't even do that. He says the
parents of an Israeli hostage are given a
place on the stage. The message is clear.
Only Israeli pain matters enough to be heard.
If Palestinian suffering is to be acknowledged at
all in a single line uttered by someone
who isn't Palestinian.
It says there are many supporting Kamala Harris
who have been horrified by the genocide in
Gaza. Many have wept many times over it.
But as much as I understand their desperation
to stop Trump, this their horror has limits.
Not rocking the boat is now their priority,
not Palestinian life. Sad.
Isn't that the same thing we're showing you
on the other side? They're challenging
their principles because they don't have any, quite
frankly, for
the outcome.
And again, I frankly believe that it doesn't
matter
in the sense that Zionism wins. Now it
says, it is very clear that many self
described progressives
have decided to dupe themselves.
There is no evidence that Kamal Harris is
going to stop Israel's genocide. In fact, I
will make it clear with her speech that
she doesn't want to and she won't.
It's all based on hopes and prayers because
the Palestinians are now
inconveniences to the presidential election. That's disgustingly
correct.
And the the the the bottom line is
that her statement about self determination
as I I think even O'Neill might have
made the point if I remember correctly. How
that she's just repeating what it's not new.
Clinton said it in the past. Obama said
they've all said the same thing. It never
hence comes to fruition because they don't ever
want it to be the case. They're just
giving you the one line that gets you
to think that she'll be the thing. Just
like Trump does. They all do it successfully.
It says those who want to stop a
genocide should surely be using all the leverage
they have in the election.
They if they can't even get a democratic
leadership to offer a platform for a vetted
Palestinian with a vetted speech, they should ask
themselves some searching questions. Now, Now, of course,
the problem is, like we're doing on the
other side, you get people that come back
and they go, but what what we're gonna
just let Trump win? You just wanna let
him win?
That's that's what you get. It's a brick
wall you come up against with this conversation.
I'm not saying that. But if you're willing
to, ignore,
either with this and Kamala Harris or with
that on with Trump, that you ignore what
you're looking at because you just don't want
the other side to win, then you've already
lost.
We need to stand back and reflect on
how that is a trap. It's an ongoing
cycle that will never end. So, yeah, let's
just put it this way. Maybe you do
have to let the other side win if
you think that's how that works out. I
don't. I think it's already predesigned pre predestined
or just it's it's already designed that way.
But let's just say that's the case, then
maybe you do have to let them take
that win so that you can make this
change.
Again, just going through the motions because you
don't see a different option, guys, that's giving
up.
Now it says, it is difficult to imagine
being a Palestinian right now, living through unimaginable
horror and being treated with so much contempt
every day, including by those who profess solidarity.
So message to Palestinians, some of us will
never give up on you, whatever the cost.
Now there's also the conversation of people that
go, why are why is what's it's the
genocide. As much as it is a bad
thing, what we're focusing on for the American
election. And so that's a fair point. But
let's realize that it's not just about that.
It's about the fact that your governments are
lying
about what they're doing, involvement there, both sides,
or you're just your government. Or the fact
that both sides are just your government, are
undeniably
influenced by the government
leading that genocide, if not completely co opted
by it.
That should clearly matter. And that's what this
is really all about. But on top of
that, just human life. You know? The the
reality of what we're involved in as Americans,
what our money is going to. Right? That
should matter. But even if you think it
shouldn't be involved in the conversation, the points
are still the same.
All it is is using this conversation to
highlight the faults and the problems of the
system here. And of course, that should matter.
But here's what she said. Of course, here's
Aviva Clampus, the minute the open of the
sycophant liar for Israel,
pointing this is just a smaller clip of
what she had to say, and it's very
clear. That's why she highlighted this one part.
No matter what,
weirdly, just like Trump, will support Israel no
matter what.
And let me be clear.
Oh, and listen to the people there. So
let's be clear about this. It's obvious that
the vast majority of Democrats do not support
what Israel's doing.
I'd I'd argue personally that I think the
majority of Republicans, rather conservatives,
do not as well.
That's harder to see, but I actually think
that. I think that we're watching the the
the leading Republican and and Democrat manipulators act
like there's more like like we're seeing right
here. Look at this what you're seeing. Everything
about pro Israel gets a screaming cheer from
this crowd,
but that in no way represents the actual
people of the Democrat party. It just doesn't.
You can easily prove that. Or rather, again,
liberals
who vote for Democrats.
So think about that in both sides of
this. It's all an illusion.
They're presenting to you what they want the
from within the minority of this party paradigm.
That's what they want you to think and
see as the majority. But us all back
here, the actual majority of conservatives, liberals, and
people that see through it all,
recognize that that's not even that's not what
we all think. We don't want war. We
don't wanna support a genocidal government.
But here we are. Watch the crowds at
the conventions there. Yay, Israel. Well, it's what
we want. Just not the reality.
We're being snowed.
I will always
stand up for Israel's right to defend itself
and I Can you imagine saying that for
10 months,
10 months
of more bombing than all other wars from
World War 2 combined?
Think about that. Or or bombings?
I just it's incredible with such a small
location. I mean, they're breaking records in every
negative way you can possibly imagine. But to
live it's under investigation and being charged with
crimes from the ICC and the ICJ,
genocide,
but defend yourself?
How can you actually stay there? I mean,
this is my point. They know that most
people go, that's not true. But she says
it anyway.
Who's she saying it to?
To Israel, I would imagine.
I will always ensure
Israel has the ability to defend itself. In
other words, continue arming them using your tax
dollars with, you know, the merchants of death.
The the weapons they continue to use as
we speak to murder innocent people And we're
gonna get to that next. If you if
you're sitting here listening that this you that
you don't believe that's what's happening, please please
do not leave and you stay tuned for
another I don't know. Just I don't like
misrepresent the time. But the next segment we're
gonna get into. The reality of how many
doctors are watching what they're doing.
Execution of children.
Watching it happen. Watching them deny the medical
equipment they need to help these people. Watching
them starve and bribe and rape and destroy
everything.
I've got at least 18 different videos of
doctors separately telling you what they've watched from
around the world, and that's not supposed to
have any impact?
That's incredible to me.
Because the people of Israel must never again
face the horror that a terrorist organization called
Hamas That Israel funded into power. Right? So
a group that they funded is not supposed
to have influence over them? I mean, I'm
not I'm not not just saying anybody should
have influence over anybody, but think about what
you're saying. That we have to do all
this to make sure that the group that
Israel put there that funded into power made
sure to make sure they divided everybody, that
that power didn't have any effect on them?
Wasn't that just the, a problem of their
own creation?
Yes.
Why do why do what do Americans have
to fund to stop something they put there?
Even if that's I mean, I don't even
honestly still know if that's the reality.
I don't know. I I mean, I I
recognize how this has shifted over the years
and it's certainly possible that it is just
turned into a resistance movement entirely.
I I completely keep that open in my
mind. But at the end of the day,
I will never ignore the fact that up
until October 7th, they were still getting funding
from Israel.
It's on the record.
All of this doesn't matter to their conversation.
And the problem is that most people now
know this stuff.
There's there are they're they're speaking to an
illusion
that was happening a decade ago. Calls on
October 7,
including
unspeakable sexual violence in the And there's the
illusion there's the the nod to the lie
about the rape. Including unspeakable
sexual violence. And there's the illusion. There's the
the nod to the lie about the rape.
That, again,
10 months now from Israeli media and everybody
else included, there is not a single video
of anybody being raped despite all the claims.
Patrick Beck David just made that even more
prominent. He got caught for saying, we all
seen it. No. No. You haven't. It's not
real. It's not there. On top of the
fact that every single aspect over and over
and over continually shows
inadvertently after the fact that they didn't prove
anything. Whether it's the UN investigation, their own
fake stories, the New York time they have
to take back down because they got caught
lying, the zak of people that get repeatedly
shown to be knowingly lying about some of
the worst things I've ever heard in my
life. A woman's stomach being cut open, babies
in an oven, 40 beheaded babies, 15 babies
on a clothesline. What is their obsession with
hurting children?
Because none of that is true and it's
been proven by literally everybody. But here she
is,
going through the motions,
earning all that money. Massacre
of young people at a music festival.
Well, yeah. Again, proving that we can show
now with multiple videos that the idea if
we're using them as human shields. That's not
to say that Hamas didn't kill some of
them. I I'd be surprised if that didn't
happen during the crossfire. But IDF in 3
videos that I've shown are using them in
their cars, them by the cars, or just
them in general to shoot around while they're
shooting at Hamas.
I again, Shoney Luke and the rest of
them, I think it's easy to prove at
this point that they were shot by the
IDF and they got and, you know, Shoney
Luke in particular,
Remember, proven. Despite the video of her in
the truck, which is horrible. I'm not even
saying it's not. It's horrible.
And the people were spitting, and the the
those people are the the point is that
they were acting in anger, which is gross.
No matter what their justification.
But
as we've seen in many videos where Hamas
were saying, don't don't. These people are under
our protection. There's multiple of those videos. And
they took her to a hospital which was
backed up by Newsweek and her parents.
And then guess what? The hospital got demolished
by Israel's bombing.
Yep. That's how this keeps going. Now of
course, they keep lying about the the the
bones they find or the skull fragments then
it gets shown to be a lie. Over
and over, Herzog, the president keeps getting caught
lying about this stuff. But people like Kamala
Harris will lie to their base and many
people keep pushing it. And you know these
disgusting
liars like Aviva Clampas just share the narrative.
Here, our now batroned, another clip. I'll play
it first and read you what he said
about it. Now I think there's a little
bit of an overlap here but more to
it.
And know this,
I will never hesitate
to take whatever action is necessary
to defend our forces and our interests against
Iran and Iran backed terrorists.
Of course. I mean, can we just get
past it? This has never stopped. And do
you know why? Because that is Israel's focus.
It's not up for debate. It is the
obvious I mean, it's more obvious than any
part of this conversation.
They've been constantly fear mongering around that con
and just don't forget.
Operation Ajax was an illegal coup that the
US and Israel conducted against Iran. They put
their own people in power, the Shah, who
created a horrifying situation for anybody other than
the select little group that they like to
show you videos of. It's it's undeniably obvious.
People were starving. It was a horrifying situation
other than their select little inner group.
Then the Iranian people revolted and took back
their country. And ever since, they've been Iran
bad guy, whistles and bombs and nuclear weapon.
They're lying to you.
At every turn,
even the the I the International Atomic Energy
Agency and the US State Department have said
not too long ago that they are not
trying to make up a nuclear bomb. But
they just keep making the lies. People like
Kamala just keep pushing the same old stories.
To how can we possibly pretend that they
are the problem when everything they point to
as Iran being behind,
like ISIS or terrorism, constantly keep getting shown
drawn right back to US and Israel? Do
you realize they keep saying Iran is the
leading state sponsor of terrorism, but then that
leading state spot terrorism they point to, like
ISIS, keeps
bombing and attacking Iran?
I mean, is that simple to see how
dumb this is? Twice now since this has
started past October 7th, ISIS, we're told, whatever
you think that really is, has attacked Iran.
They've even declared Iran one of their leading
enemies now based on what the narratives are.
This is what they're presenting. But then they're
still elite stating sponsor terrorism when the leading
terrorist entity we're told is fighting them, or
Al Qaeda, which they've worked I mean, every
single element ties directly back to the US
and Israel. These are their proxy elements. It's
not up for debate. There's an easily provable
reality.
Eventually, people will come around like that with
Zionism and everything else. Eventually, we'll see it
because the facts are there. People are waking
up to seeing these things. But just thinking
about how embarrassing it is that her narrative
is about fighting Iran. I mean, what about
why is this even the mo the focal
point for these people? What about any number
of other things that Americans care about? What
about the fact that we're watching a government
commit genocide and you're concerned about the government
that's actively trying to help people fighting that
genocide?
It's it's just such it's an inversion of
reality. These people are bad people.
I will not cozy up to tyrants
and dictators like Kim Jong un. Except you
will with Netanyahu though and all the rest
of them, and they're far, far, far more
dangerous than people like Kim Jong un. Who
are rooting for Trump.
Who are Let's see on point. Right. All
the bad guys, they're Trump people.
Why not? Certainly make people yay. Bad guy
Trump. Rooting for Trump.
Because, you know, they know
they know
he is easy to manipulate with flattery and
favors.
It's not not untrue.
But the point is it's the same. It
doesn't make any difference. These people are in
line with all the same things, all of
them. Just because they make a different narrative
about the different conversations,
look at the policy in regard to North
Korea or Iran or Venezuela,
just going back through to the different administrations.
The same point they made before.
Weird how the narrative seem or the the
objective, the agenda, it just keeps going in
the same direction. Isn't that funny? And you
can make the same point during Trump's administration,
during Biden's administration, whether it's Operation Warp Speed
or Venezuela. It's the same thing.
It's not even if if you just look,
you'll see.
Just because they have a different narrative about
what they're fighting, the same things are happening.
So this is the same thing they're doing
here. I vote for this, vote for Trump,
is I vote for North Korea. It's just
meaningless nonsense.
They're all your government
working with the same things.
They know Trump won't hold auto autocrats accountable
because he wants to be an autocrat himself.
Like, they're not the same thing. This woman
that challenged everything they ever pretended they you
know, the conversation
about cannabis and putting people in jail or
pretending to fight, everything about these people are
contradictory.
They are presenting a narrative of who they
are when they are all the same problem.
They're desperately fighting for their own authoritarian power
and control.
It's just a different flavor.
And as president,
I will never waver in defense of America's
security and ideals because in Now here here's
one thing I don't want you to miss.
This whole rah rah America, like, we're fighting
for America for like, isn't it the whole
thing is both of them are presenting that.
Even though both of them them come around
and go, no. No. But they're secretly for
communism. No. But he's secretly for fascism.
That's all it is.
Put both of them in the crowds. America.
But
okay. So are we pretending that are you
are you making the argument that they're secretly
going America, but they're like, yay, communism.
Right? I mean or or yay, North Korea,
whatever. It just doesn't make much sense when
you look at what they're actually doing. Both
sides are of the mind that they're fighting
for the country, while the other side pretends
they're fighting for something else. Maybe one side
with China, one side with Russia.
If you can't see how this is being
used to to like bottleneck you right into
the like RFK's playing a part of that,
then I really don't think you wanna see
it. Whether it's enjoyable that you're watching this
real reality TV dynamic. I mean this is
sure interesting. It's like watching an episode of
some show. Right? But it's embarrassing. These people
are really stupid.
And the enduring
struggle
between democracy
and tyranny.
I know where I stand and I know
where the United States belongs.
Yeah. And, really, the only thing this comes
down to for most of these people is
that she represents the opposite of what they
want.
So they've over Trump.
I I I'm willing to bet you anything
that you could change. I mean, this is
why they're not even presenting policy for the
most part. I mean, even what's Trump putting
forward? I mean, they say a lot of
things, but where's the real meat and potatoes?
That doesn't even happen anymore. And, of course,
you got the other side saying, Kamala will
put a website up and then add policy.
I I agree. But the point is, I
think that's sort of a side of the
times. I don't think that there's a lot
who cares about debates, who cares about this.
We're just gonna run forward because they've got
you in a position where enough people are
mindlessly following along. So they just go, well,
who cares? You're you're voting based on the
against the other side or of the ideologue
anyway, so let's just get rid of all
the policy.
So here's what our enabotron said. He says,
Kamal Harris, in the foreign policy section of
her acceptance speech, revives Biden rhetoric again, it's,
like, verbatim
what they were saying before, that we all
live in a good versus evil world defined
by a struggle the between democracy and tyranny,
and that America needs to strengthen its global
relationship or leadership.
Which, by the way, despite what the right
might put forward as the fighting globalism, is
exactly the same conversation.
Right? Just like Trump said last time, we
don't wanna be the policeman of the world.
Then he went on to, just like the
rest of them, be the policeman of the
world.
That's globalism, guys. That's what these people are.
It says, she also said she'll always stand
up for Israel. Israel's right to defend itself
and will always ensure Israel has the ability
to defend itself because the people of Israel
must never again face the horror of Hamas.
Again, the Hamas group that Israel funds.
In other words, as was to be expected,
she she if she's
elected, will have just the same fanatically
ideological
America
seeing itself as leading a democracy camp in
a fight against tyrants, but ironically acting as
one of the most tyrannical empires in history
in that pursuit, including abetting genocide.
Whichever way it goes, mind you. That's that
is the definition of what this government is.
Walking around like it's fighting tyranny while it's
be while it is the living embodiment of
tyranny.
Now Francesca Albanese points this out, and this
is the point I was just kinda making.
This is disheartening to witness individuals identifying as
democrats, which I get you know, I believe
she leans in that category. My point is
that it's whatever side we're talking about. We're
talking about individuals who identify and personally as
something that is about, you know, freedom of
speech or whatever you wanna frame it as.
But people that are who who are like
who identify as let's just put it as
people that wanna believe in free speech, chanting
USA, USA USA, could drown out the voices
of those demanding that the US stop killing
women in Gaza.
But, yeah, this is this is the kind
it's the same conversation. My point is if
you wanna pretend this is about, like, anti
American people, which is what Trump and them
keep framing it as, why are they chanting
USA?
The point is they see themselves as fighting
for this country, and they're being played the
same way. Ultimately, what you're hear gonna hear
is Ben Diya Benjamin
calling out what Kamala Harris they were fighting
for. Despite the fact that the right conversation
would frame them as the lefties they're fighting,
but here they are calling out Kamala Harris.
Funny how that works, but what they're she's
doing is calling out what they're doing and
the people there who you'd like to pretend
are gonna fight for these things. And here's
my point. Even from the left conversation, you
see they're they're
largely
calling out Israel's genocide. But yet, weirdly, the
people that have been allowed into this controlled
situation
are all going USA to to drown out
her pointing that out.
I think it's very interesting.
The whole crowd is chanting USA
USA.
I mean, think about how ridiculous that is.
They're they're saying stop killing women and children
in Gaza.
USA. USA. It's like, are we that lost?
I mean, come on. Like, even if you
don't agree with that, that is a very
weird thing to chant while they're calling about
genocide. My point though is that, one, they're
chanting USA. That seems to be kind of
a different thing than what you might be
framed as, but that's the illusion. Right? Both
sides project themselves as the one fighting for
the country and the other one destroying it
when in reality they're they're they say that's
the the bottleneck driving you all in the
same spot.
But on top of that,
we're talking about
the crowd supposed to be representing the left
when clearly that's not the reality with what
we can see in the world today. So
we're all being played, guys. That's what I'm
trying to get people to see. Let's find
some solidarity. Let's find some some unity in
the reality that people out there are all
being played from left and right to keep
us in one position.
I really think that could be, you know,
kind of a unifying call here.
Now, here's a person that's kept I saw
a lot of examples of this. Where she
she attended the Paris Waltz event.
And didn't in this whole thread you could
watch in videos and so on, where she
doesn't say anything. Just silently stands there, but
they ultimately made her leave because she wore
a shirt that said free Gaza.
Again, it's it's if if you right now,
there are a lot of Republicans who recognize
the problem and call even calling out Trump
for it. Recognize some solidarity with somebody who
might just be perceived to be on the
other side politically, who also sees it. Yeah.
Maybe you disagree in a lot of other
things, but recognize that you at least you
you have a moral compass.
You're both leaning in the same direction because
this is wrong.
Find something there. Work on that.
Screw the left and the right discussion and
the paradigm the identity you've built around that.
Find your identity around having a moral compass
pointing in the right direction. Seems like a
good place to start. But they kicked her
out. Because whether it's Trump or Harris or
RFK or anybody else, they're all in support
of Israel.
Here are a bunch of Democrats who are
walking by. They were out front, basically, reading
out the names of Palestinian children. You know,
basically, the equivalent of putting up posters of
of Israel detainees and hostages. Right? It's the
same difference. And so the point being,
who are these people who thought it was
okay to respond this way to reading of
dead children's names?
This one this guy was making fun of
it, laughing at them, calling them nickname. They
they're all just plugging their ears walking by.
These are all, like, you know, people that
are, you know, the elite elitists of the
democrat conversation here.
I think it's crazy to me. Like, even
if you disagree, what do you are you
plugging your ears? Like, the it's like this
is a weird reaction
to the reality of what's going on. They
just don't wanna know because it hurts their
political game.
Here's what Tiberius pointed out. He's right. It's
insane.
He says the left. We should reject everyone
who is complicit in genocide, which is kind
of like a classic discussion.
Then he says, liberals are just, you know,
the current conversation. You stupid children just don't
understand how politics works. Those standards are far
too high. We have to do some genocide
because I'm not on the receiving end, and
also orange man bad, silly.
You know, calling out their stupidity.
I guess, toward the left, but it's the
we could see it. It's everybody in the
political paradigm. They're blinding themselves based on their
personal narratives because it works for their current
situation. That's the 2 party illusion for you.
This woman responded,
yeah. Keep up with the blood libel. Yeah.
Go on. I mean, I just of course,
she just got completely ratioed and people going,
I don't think you understand what blood libel
means.
But court that's not the point. Apparently, anything
that says the word genocide now is apparently
blood libel.
I mean, it just shows you how how
ignorant this conversation has gotten.
And of course, I responded with that meme
from princess bride. I don't think the word
means what you think it means. And she
freaked out and said, you proved my point
for me. I also included a link to
the human, shield point where she responded with,
the point is that everything there shows you
that these people are being
lying to you or that they are being
lost in this conversation for some reason. But
she said she responded after they posted this.
I mean, yes. That is blood libel. Because
they're
specifically chose children to be used as human
shield. That's what I responded to.
So I so I so by by saying
that we should not care about genocide is
blood libel because
Hamas uses human shields?
I just think I think this whole thing
has broken people's minds.
At the end of the day, I I
said it right there, are you referring to
Israel government? Because they you're right. They use
human shields. And they that might be use
the source material for her rats and everything.
And she's just like, yes. Thank you for
proving my point. I don't know. I I
think this is a new, of course it
could be a bot. That's that's not something
we should deny today. It's just half the
Internet. I think more than that on Twitter.
But either way, this is the if if
we see this is where the conversation is,
then we need to recognize that this is
something that is not,
what's the word for it? Not advantageous, but
not productive.
I mean, there are times when I fall
into this because I think it might make
a point, and I almost I almost regret
it every time. Engaging with idiots on Twitter.
The point is that at the end of
the day,
if we need to be able to pull
out of this the reality that this is
something that's, you know,
engineered. Let's put it that way. Because this
is I mean, what what else does this
do besides just miring the conversation and stupidity?
What he said was just, highlighting the contradictory
statement, and she goes to blood libel.
That's that's it. That's it. You're racist. Period.
That's the conversation. You're a racist. That's it.
Well, that's the point. That's lost. Because you
guys have lost the plot.
And you know why? Because the reality of
what he's highlighting
has never been more clear.
Now this went and and on top of
the the warning that was added to it,
showing you what I mean about Twitter,
this is undeniable.
Now I'm gonna play these.
Let's go through them. Because I think it's
important for people to hear and see that
might not have seen it. Now a couple
of these you've already seen on the show.
But the vast majority, I have not played
on the show. So what we're gonna show
you is how many doctors.
And this is just some. There's so many
more out there. And I'm gonna grab this,
but if you see new ones, send it
to me. I'm gonna put it in this
thread.
I started it by saying how many doctors
returning from Gaza telling you that Israel's deliberately
targeting children do you need to see or
hear before something shifts?
Now, then I went on to make it
more than just targeting children. Just genocide, murdering
people,
j j mutilation.
So let's play some of these. I know
some of this is hard to listen to,
but I want you guys to hear this.
But first, recognize that all this is is
videos of doctors in interviews.
None of it is graphic. None of it
is anything other than them expressing what they've
seen.
Now, to be clear,
that does not apply.
But they put a warning anyway. Here's what
the warning says.
We put a message on this.
We put we put a warning message on
these posts because they might have sensitive content.
And here's what they list off. Nudity,
sexual content, violence. That's like visual gore, hateful
symbols.
That's it.
None of that applies.
As far as I understand it, talking about
things like on a news broadcast is not
enough unless you're cursing or being sexual to
get these things taken down.
So the point is they flagged it, which
dramatic I mean, since they did that, it
completely dropped off. This thing was going this
was get going viral.
But now it's gone.
If you don't see that as deliberate Twitter
suppression of these kind of conversations, I don't
think you're paying attention. I've seen countless examples
of Twitter removing videos because they don't like
what it's showing. Not even necessarily graphic, just
showing you what's going on in Gaza.
This is deliberate suppression, and there's countless examples
of how Twitter, whether it's Elon pandering to
Netanyahu showing up as personal guest for him
to lie to all of congress,
or whether you think, as people suggest, they've
got something on him. I don't know. But
at the end of the day,
it's obvious based on autentics to verify Twitter,
even though he lied about that going away.
Using c h e q to stop the
bot problem when it's just a Israeli bot
farm that's overtaken Twitter. Guys, it's undeniable
that Israel through Elon is is completely censoring
and manipulating Twitter.
So let's show you what they want you
to think you shouldn't be listening to. Please
share this. Get this reach in spite of
the warning of sensitive content. We're gonna start
with the one that you've seen. This one
kills me every time because of how emotional
he gets as a veteran doctor who has
been through this.
You and Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I had children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips, 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw. Think about that statement.
They all have the same point.
Every other thing he's ever seen in his
entire career combined does not equal what he
saw in Gaza. And we're supposed to dismiss
this. We're supposed to ignore this. We're supposed
to not give this. I mean, this is
bombshell.
If this was about any if this was
about Iran or Russia or China or Venezuela,
it would be everywhere,
But not on Twitter, not on the free
speech haven, not on any I mean, this
this and this was even done by a
mainstream report. And yet, here we are. Every
government that needs to hear still supporting, still
arming, still gaslighting.
Every single person running in this pretend election
is supposed to be they're all supporting this
genocidal entity that's doing this?
We're still giving them bombs and and money
and I mean, my god.
We don't let's not forget about the ridiculous
port the the pier,
the game they did where they built a
pier under the guys that were gonna bring
food in. They conducted an operation that deliberately
targeted and murdered civilians, and then they brought
it, they were done. And then now the
pier's gone.
It's just it's just so stupidly obvious. These
people are trying to tell you.
Against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza. And
when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children. Almost exclusively.
That needs to resonate.
This is a war on children. I don't
mean that because all wars affect children more,
because they do. I mean, this is a
deliberate targeted war on children. As one part
of an extermination campaign,
That's what this is.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded? Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority, or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be a,
an orphan
in watching your family,
you know, melted in front of you? I
swear it gets me every time.
I just say see somebody like that breakdown.
Like, imagine what he must be going through.
I mean, and this this person has to
see it. But let alone imagine what they're
dealing with in Gaza, that it makes this
man almost cry
despite being involved in, you know, in many
war fields of war, in in in earthquakes,
in in in in ground 0.
And yet he almost breaks down in tears
because of what he's describing.
I just it kills me that people can
ever act like this is not the most
that people are just missing this online. What
else? They'll just listen to doctors?
It's just it's unbelievable to me. And I'm
not saying blindly trust anybody.
But to pretend like this compilation of information
along with everything else we've seen is not
absolutely
definitive
is unbelievable to me. Write it in front
of you. How do you fix that? Ever
fix that?
In fact, so many Palestinian children have had
family members killed that doctors created a shorthand
term,
wcnsf,
wounded child,
no surviving family.
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure of the hospital has
been destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered
in the last 12, 24 hours with who
have been handcuffed.
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed. The whole infrastructure of the hospital has
been destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered,
in the last 12 to 24 hours with
who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back.
And so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor?
By the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7th.
Over 450
health care workers have been killed. Friends of
mine that I've worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I can bear witness from this
from my time at Alexa Hospital and from
talking to people that there's been direct targeting
of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals by the
IDF to be taken off and executed is
your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital? Without exception, every single one has
responded to say they have never witnessed any
Hamas militants in the hospitals they have worked
in.
I said unreal. That goes back to Al
Shifa Hospital.
So right now, if you're watching this, take
a moment and share this out. We're gonna
keep going through these, and I want this
to catch people's attention. Right now is a
good moment to take a break and share
this out to people because they're gonna tap
into this in a live feed and watch
these people talking about this. We may just
catch new people despite the censorship and suppression.
So take a moment and get that reach
out there. Share it from the bottom of
any platform you're on, from the website itself.
Get this out there. Let's play another one.
It it's it's if you can think of
something bad that is happening in the world
that's happening in Gaza or to people from
Gaza, the things that I saw there that
really
stood out or really, really
impacted me and made me realize what's actually
going on were were a few. Number 1
was the the malnutrition and starvation, which is
deliberate. That's perfectly obvious. Even American senators are
giving speeches saying that it's deliberate.
The second thing was the targeting of children
with gunfire.
That's that that I was not expecting to
see actually. I,
I knew how many had how many children
had been killed. I knew about the massive
killing,
in general, but
I just assumed it was all from
from bondings. But that doesn't explain children getting
shot in the head. Oh, boy.
That doesn't explain children getting shot in the
head and definitely not every day. I mean,
literally, every day I was there, I saw
a child shot on the head. I I
I kept the journal when I was there,
and I just went through it because some
reporters asked me to. And, and, like, quite
literally, every day I was there, I saw
a child shot in the head. That's not
an accident. That And, again, as the other
one said, almost exclusively
children,
Shredded, smashed, shot in the head twice with
sniper bullets.
I mean, how much do these people need
to hear to actually recognize this is a
deliberate action? This is not side effect. This
is not a byproduct. This is the direction.
Sort of like we now found out that
human shields is not an accident. It's not
an individual choice. It is a systematic
order coming down from the top, you know,
like we've all been telling you if you've
been paying attention.
This is a very problematic thing, guys. This
is the issue of our time. What these
entities are doing outside of their country, let
alone to Gaza,
is monumental.
I've been saying this from the I've been
saying this for a long time. We all
remember this for centuries. We'll be talking about
this for a very long time. But what
we need to focus on is the influence
from outside from outside the country. What they're
doing to other countries to allow this. How
ask yourself how this was ever allowed to
be this way for 75 years.
That you just didn't know these things. That
are all oh my god. It's right there.
It's on the United Nations. It's on Wikipedia
for crying out loud. I don't see that.
Because there's been a controlled manipulation. We're still
living in it. But it is it is
breaking down as we speak.
Get this in front of people.
It's deliberate
targeting
of children for death. That's murder. The injury
patterns I've seen most consistently are things like
crush injuries as a result of Israeli air
strikes on homes.
Between 60 to 70%
of those injured and those who make it
to the hospital are actually children.
I can tell you that I have seen,
injuries that indicate deliberate targeting of children and
deliberate targeting of civilians. So I've seen things
like gunshot wounds to the abdomen of children,
to the chest.
I have
documented
evidence of gunshot wounds to the extremities of
babies,
quadcopter attacks on children,
gunshot wounds to the chest of children. I
saw things like Israeli landmines
exploding on children who were playing in a
cemetery.
So the the injury patterns and the things
that you see as a doctor are are
quite horrifying,
more so than the first time around. I
think the second the second mission,
the injuries have been a lot worse and
a lot more catastrophic and devastating.
Now this this one you've seen, I think
I've got a couple from her, but she's
been speaking about this from the beginning.
Emergency department at Al Aqsa Hospital
is a complete bloodbath. It looks like a
slaughterhouse.
The the images and videos that I've received
show patients lying on the floor everywhere in
pools of blood with missing extremities because their
limbs had been blown off. Parents running around
covered in soot carrying their children who have
blood running from their head, trying to find
a health care provider to treat them, but
it's so chaotic and there are so many
patients.
When they were told to evacuate
what was considered a safe zone, Rafa,
there's they were told, no. Go to Al
Molasi. Go to Adir el Bala. And so
about a1000000 of them did.
It is a utter and complete
massacre,
and I do not know how you could
see the footage we're seeing, hear the stories
we're hearing, and not be absolutely
convinced
that this is a genocide that needs to
be stopped immediately.
It's
an avalanche of human suffering that's a 100%
manmade. It is the the worst humanitarian catastrophe
I've experienced in my lifetime
and in my growingly long career in humanitarian
medicine.
And it's burning through the hearts of every
single humanitarian that I know. You know, I'm
going to paint a picture for you of
the degree of suffering that we're seeing.
People keep asking me about medical aid and
hospitals and the situation of the hospitals. The
entire
hospital health care system
collapsed almost a week ago. It was announced
on TV for the whole world to see.
And in that week, there has been indiscriminate
bombardment. And I don't even know if indiscriminate
is the right term, because it's targeting health
care facilities, ambulances,
churches, mosques,
schools,
refugee
camps, densely
populated refugee camps,
wiping out entire families in a second, entire
multigenerational
extended families
in a second.
There are almost 1,000
families in the Gaza Strip who have had
at least 2 members of their family, at
least 2 members killed
in the last 3 weeks.
There are almost 4,000 children
who have been killed and identified, excluding almost
1,000 children whose bodies are still trapped under
the rubble.
Some of them may be alive for a
long period before they ultimately die under the
rubble. And I'm sorry if there are any
young, you know, children watching this. Perhaps this
is a good time to ask them to
leave the room. But I think it's important
that I paint a picture,
particularly when I'm following
a news narrative
that almost dismisses
this avalanche of of suffering that that is
unprecedented
in modern times.
You know, there's an acronym in the in
the Gaza Strip right now. You know, I'm
a pediatric intensive care doctor. I see a
lot of suffering in my career.
There's an acronym that is
unique to the Gaza Strip, and it's called
it's WCNSF,
wounded child, no surviving family.
Children and it is used not infrequently
in the last 3 weeks.
It was coined in the last 3 3
weeks.
One physician told me 2 days ago that
or a few days ago that a little,
girl came in wounded, and she had a
piece of paper in her pocket that she
handed to him. He sent me a picture
of the piece of paper.
It had 27 names on it, and she
said, These are the members of my family
that were with me in my home.
Please look for them. Please look for them
under the rubble. Don't look for this one,
and she points to the name of her
sister.
I know she's already dead.
This is a 10 year old little girl.
Wounded child, no surviving family should not exist
as an acronym. And to to follow
president Biden
as he
continues
to justify and to warmonger.
All I can say is this has to
stop. It's a collective state on our humanity.
It's a a stain on our collective humanity.
And let me ask you You paint such
a vivid and horrific picture.
You really do. And I understand that these
are your friends and who you've worked with
and how difficult that must be.
You're not alone.
I've been hearing today from reading
testimony today from Philip Lazzarini, who's the commissioner
general of UNRWA. He's been speaking to the
UN Security Council. He said this, the sanitary
conditions are appalling.
People live on very little bread and whatever
is left of some water.
70 of their staff members have been killed,
and they are looking after
670,000
people in their refugee centers.
Is there any sign from what you're hearing
that of a humanitarian
pause or pauses
that could be negotiated?
I'm not a politician, but the word pause
to me makes no sense. You know, you
pause to to to nourish and and and
hydrate a population before you kill them.
It it just doesn't make any sense for
me. You you stop the bombardment. That is
what that is what the entire global community
should be pushing for and should be,
insisting on.
You you you know, and and I think,
in in leading up to my introduction, I
think you interviewed somebody who said something very
similar,
a a who said something very similar. You
know, the priority is not giving us aid.
You need to stop
the indiscriminate bombardment.
So I think, yes, what is needed
is a humanitarian
truce or a ceasefire,
global intervention, things that were voted for by
the overwhelming majority of countries on this planet
a few days ago in the General Assembly
of the United
Nations, yet they're not adhered to.
And remember, this was the framework that was
voted on, that it was agreed to, that
Israel has now come multiple times broken. That's
why Hamas is no longer even coming to
these conversations because they're acting like the agreement
is going towards a ceasefire, but it's not.
And this is openly discussed by people in
Israel. I'll show you next.
And are are completely disregarded by the powers
that be.
2 powers to make to be specific. Mhmm.
Right. When we have a lot of cases
in hospitals, you can talk to every doctor
about how there are a lot of patients
that die due to unknown infections. We don't
know what's going on to them, and we
cannot really test them because we don't have
the labs, and we don't have the equipment.
We don't have even the specialized people that
are required to tackle these issues. When foreign
doctors incinerate their clothing because they're afraid to
spread diseases to their home countries,
that should raise a lot of questions.
They only identified polio this time, but I'm
sure there are a lot of organisms that
would cause a lot of havoc if He
seems to be suggesting this is deliberate, and
I agree. I think it's an easy thing
to prove that they've at least allowed the
problem to grow because they knew that would
hurt them. But I argue, as Robert does,
that it seems that there are deliberate actions
being taken to actually make this happen.
Whether it's polio or whatever else we're talking
about, whatever you think is happening, they're putting
they're making them sick. I think that's easy
to see. Now, think about that from the
context of a, you know, pandemic conversation. Weren't
they just telling us that one case is
too many? But now it's like, who cares?
We don't care about them. Let it go.
Like, it's just they don't care about anything,
always. And I'm talking about the establishment, not
just one side or the other. It's like
any other conversation. The thing they swore was
the most important yesterday no longer matters today
because of the new direction.
And
we just can't do anything about it. And
I'm really tired of watching patients die because
of things that I really cannot control. In
no time, these infections will spread everywhere. There
will not be limited to Gaza. We should
do something about it.
As you mentioned, I went on a 5
week medical mission, and we established a field
hospital on the border of Hain Yunus and
Rafa.
And, you know, Einman, as soon as you
get there, you realize
the level of devastation
is magnitudes more than what,
you expect,
from watching news footage and social media
comfort
coverage. Nothing,
that I've I've had in my training really
could prepare me for the level of,
atrocities that I witnessed, the types of mass
casualty incidents that
we were managing day in and day out,
60, 70,
patients coming in at a time where we
had to color code them,
to determine
who,
we could really invest our scarce resources in
trying to resuscitate,
working with very deplete inventory
of medications,
supplies,
equipment,
having to do
surgery with limited anesthetics.
For the first, over a month, we were
only using Ketamine
to,
provide analgesia,
and all all this to say that we
were opening
patients' abdomens and trying to resect intestines
that were,
damaged by shrapnel and gunshot wounds.
We're gonna get to that point in a
second about and we've talked about this many
times over the years using Abby Martin's work
in regard to butterfly bullets and god only
knows what else they're using today,
which are all I mean, whether it's white
phosphorus or any kind of other munitions they're
using, they're designed to maximize suffering, which is
why they've been outlawed they've been outlawed and
banned in warfare or anywhere else.
Now, white phosphorus a small exception in the
context of how they allow they they but
it's abused in the same way. They pretend
it's for signaling and then they use it
over civilians during the day. It's ridiculous. The
point is that all of this is clear.
All of it's going in the same direction.
The, multitude of children that I
saw, I've never seen so many dead
children in my entire
life. And there's a disproportionate,
effect on the number of children
that came through the emergency department, both in
terms of shrapnel injuries from missile strikes,
but also direct targets
of,
quadcopter,
gunshot wounds gunshots.
I pulled
bullets out of, you know, 3 month old
thigh. I pulled, bullets out of a young
man's shoulder, a 13 year old boy's shoulder
who was sleeping in his tent. An 8
year old girl
shot in the abdomen as she was playing
outside her tent.
It's just unreal. Right? All of this stuff
is just and this is the same across
every one of them. Not examples where you're
like human shields or tunnels. No. They're just
sleeping in their tent, playing outside with their
friends, got shot in the abdomen. You think
that's by accident?
When you can see that they've been they
shot twice
or killed with 2 shots to the head
as a little infant that was, like I
mean, it's
the kind of stuff that we should not
even have to be talking about. These people
are the villains of our time.
And this became bread and butter for me
as an emergency physician. It was not only
heartbreaking. It you know, we're trained to take
care of
anyone and everyone and to acknowledge Right. Our
collective humanity.
Another tough day today,
with significant injuries coming in,
gunshot wounds again,
trauma
from,
shelling
and bombs.
Saw a lot of kids, unfortunately, today with
deep lacerations,
head trauma, skull fractures.
Every single one of them.
How can we deny that?
Open fractures with vascular injuries,
gunshots penetrating
certain parts of limb, which are which are
they're very specifically directed to maim,
individuals,
to cause them the the worst amount of
pain possible.
Again,
because of the border that's been closed,
the medical supplies or the supplies in general,
what used to trickle in
is not coming through.
The instrumentations that we have,
are poor quality,
even to the point that,
trying to suture with stitches and so on,
the needles are not sharp. It causes more
pain to penetrate just through the skin.
You know, sterilization
is not there, unfortunately.
I don't know if you have just heard
there was a bomb that went off just
recently just as I am speaking.
But
the people are still in good spirits.
There was some respite.
People were watching the Champions League match between
Montreal, Madrid, Bayern Munich.
People were cheering.
A bit of a break from the daily
physical and psychological
trauma that they are going through.
People,
you know, they are so amazing
with with such a good heart.
As I was leaving,
one of
This is also something that we keep hearing.
Imagine being in this position and then still
having compassion.
Right? I mean, think about how the resilience
of these people is inspiring
in countless ways.
The circulating nurses was eating
a small meal,
and he offered his last
piece of bread last piece of pita bread,
last,
to me, and he insisted that I take
it. He insisted that I eat a small
morsel
from his own plate.
Subhanallah, these are the people.
The Zionist genocidal
force
is
hell bent
on massacre.
Mhmm.
All the western governments
and the Muslim governments are in cahoots with
this,
genocidal
Zionist force.
They are complicit in the slaughter of our
children,
and Allah
will never forgive these people.
I ask upon the Muslim armies,
where are you?
Where is your 'izzah?
Where is the honor?
Where is your responsibility
to defend this?
How will you continue to watch this and
answer in front of Allah?
The Hakam
Basically, how will you answer to God?
Right. How, how are you going to face?
You know, depending on what your beliefs are.
Right.
When that time comes.
How are you going
to act like you did? I mean, I
honestly, I think people that are in this
position, aren't even considering that, or I mean,
I don't know. But I mean, it for
those that care,
that's something you should consider if you're out
there acting like this isn't happening.
Want to leave, but we cannot.
We might not survive until the morning.
I mean, you gotta realize these are doctors
that have seen they've been there. They've done
that. Right? They've seen these things, and these
people are breaking down.
Chief of Arabic for healing.
On the first day I was there in
Alexa Hospital, we were in a small trauma
bay in the ER.
And when the first mass casualty, which was
one of almost one every day I was
there,
occurred and we could hear the bombs in
the distance and we knew that about 45
minutes later,
people would come in pieces.
That children would be carried in pieces by
their loved ones.
On donkey carts and in ambulances, 4 or
5 in one ambulance.
There was a young woman who got laid
up right next to the young boy I
was treating.
She was 22 or 23 years old.
Full body surface area burns.
And she was unable to speak because she
luckily had inhalational injury because the same burns
that burned her skin luckily burned her airway.
And a woman screamed from outside the door,
she's pregnant.
And so we turned her over quickly because
she had come in, laid down on her
belly, and somebody put an ultrasound probe on
her belly and she had a viable
18 to 20 week pregnancy.
But when we did our secondary survey and
tried to understand what other injuries she had,
she had a shattered
tib fib from an explosive injury. She had
burns that covered over 70% of her surface
area,
which is a death sentence in an environment
where you can't find gauze and there isn't
clean water and there aren't antibiotics.
We all knew what this meant on the
ground, in the trauma bay, the first minutes
we met her. She was gonna die there
and her baby would die there. And there
was nothing we were gonna be able to
do about it because the Israeli government, the
IDF, had made it impossible
to care for people
to the extent which they deserve. Every human
being deserves the right to medical aid in
that situation. She was no fighter.
She was a pregnant woman who was sitting
in her home when a bomb dropped on
her head.
And she eventually moved to the ICU. And
everyday she lived until she died,
she was in pain.
Because we didn't have the kind of medicine
we needed to care for her pain. And
when wound care came in America, I'd give
her 2 Dilaudid before changing her wound dressings.
And there, I could give her nothing.
And every morning when we'd round, we'd stop
by her bed first.
And every one of us and the guys
and medical professionals who are heroes that one
day will get to be here and tell
you their stories themselves so I don't have
to tell it for them.
We'd all keep our mouth shut and keep
the tears held back because we knew we
couldn't do anything, and we knew the inevitable
was coming. Until one day I walked in
and the bed was empty.
And her story
is just one
of tens of 1,000.
And her family mourn for her just like
we would mourn for our own family members.
And she and every single person in Gaza
deserves the dignity
and support
that humanity
as a whole
is burdened and has an obligation to provide.
I I stand here and I'll conclude with
this last thought, which is
the reason I lose sleep and the reason
we cry tears,
isn't sadness anymore.
It's a feeling
that we have no ability, despite being from
the most powerful country in the world,
providing the bombs that drop on these innocent
people that we have no power to to
stop the bleeding.
I swear if that if something like that
does not reach you
to Deborah Harrington, welcome to the program. Thank
you very much. You've just returned from Gaza.
You are an OBGYN,
and you went to treat women and children,
I guess.
What did you see there? Why did you
even go?
I went because I've been to Gaza many
times.
I've been going since
2016
as part of a teaching group. I've never
been in a conflict.
I've never been in these circumstances
and what I saw was
in Al Aqsa which is in the middle
area was a hospital that was overwhelmed.
It was overwhelmed with numbers of inpatients. It
was overwhelmed with emergencies,
trauma cases coming in all the time. Now
note the date by the way.
This is December 27, 2023. So imagine how
much worse it is now. In fact, these
places have been destroyed, if not flattened entirely,
and the places they're left in are also
being bombed.
At a level that it simply wasn't set
up to deal with,
and it had swollen
to
massive numbers of patients both inpatients
but also just displaced people. So there were
thousands of people
taking refuge in the areas around the hospital
in the hospital
the normally there are about a 150 in
which they went on to bomb
and just yelled the word Hamas and your
governments dutifully went along with it patients
and that had swelled, I think, while we
were there to about 6 to 700
inpatients,
and then another 2 to 300
presenting
through the emergency department every day. So what
did you notice most?
Are they women, children, men, fighting age, fighters?
So I think so I was expecting
in some ways that this was a war
situation, and and therefore, I was sort of
anticipating that there were going to be perhaps
young men,
or, you know, all sorts of casualties, you
know, across the whole spectrum of society. But,
actually, what I overwhelmingly saw was was
children.
My god.
Every single person,
including a CNN interview with a person who's
not even part of a war. I mean,
think about how that's even possible without this
being exactly what's going on.
All really started just about a month ago
while I was there,
in Khan Yunus at Nasr Hospital.
The Israeli tanks and the military was inching
closer and closer to the hospital and had
made its way around the complex of the
hospital. And many of the staff then had
told me that this was going to unfold.
What we're seeing happening now over the course
of a week, they had predicted this is
exactly what would happen. And they knew that
because many of them had been displaced from
other hospitals throughout the Gaza Strip. Many of
them had come from, Al Aqsa Hospital in
Der El Beleh. Many of them had come
from Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. And so
they had predicted that what would happen is
people would be forced to be displaced from
around the compound where thousands of people were
sheltering,
that there would be very intense bombing and
shelling. There would be demands for them to
leave. There would be threats just like we
saw happened all of last week. And then
finally, there would be an assault on the
hospital, arrayed with troops, and many people would
be abducted.
And killed, which which is exactly what's happened
every single time. And they even said what
would happen during the abduction. They said Israeli
troops would clear the hospital floor by floor,
and whoever they felt like detaining and abducting,
they would take them, and they would be
gone anywhere from 2 weeks to 4 weeks,
and they'd be And or longer realize, there
have been people that have been detained for
20 years under no charge. Or people that
have been detained since October 7th before or
just whatever they decide to. Months.
And people come out
emaciated,
tortured,
sexually abused, as we all know now.
Subjected to humiliation
and torture, and they predicted that many people
would unnecessarily
die. And that's exactly what we heard. I
was also able to get an update from
doctor Khalid, the trauma surgeon that you just
mentioned.
And one of the things that he said
in that message was that there was it
was 3 days of hell for patients and
for doctors and for staff.
He had mentioned that they were essentially asking
many of the staff and the patients to
keep moving from building to building within the
medical complex. He mentioned that, you know, they
had to move 65
patients that were bed bound using one elevator
to the smallest and oldest building in the
compound. And it was him and 20 of
the medical staff members that remained while there
were 200 patients.
March, when I was in Gaza, I met
a patient who was a physician.
He had been working in the hospital when
the Israeli military initially bombarded the hospital, then
they entered the hospital, instructed all the patients
and the staff to leave.
My patient insisted that he needed to stay
behind to care for his patients who many
of whom couldn't leave.
He was then told to strip naked at
gunpoint,
then held at gunpoint for hours and, in
fact, for 2 entire days.
He was only allowed to urinate and to
defecate
on the floor where he stood
beside a puddle of his own urine and
feces.
Just realize we're talking about a dog not
accused of being Hamas, a doctor who wanted
to treat the patient. She was already treating
in the hospital,
and this is what they did. We already
have another story that just came out of
a doctor being forced to treat the patients
or being allowed to, but only if he
was a strip naked first. He was only
allowed to treat them while they were naked.
This is just straight up torture and humiliation.
That's assuming they didn't get shot afterward. Fearing
for his life at gunpoint for 2 days.
He wasn't allowed to access his medications, including
his own insulin to treat his diabetes.
Eventually, the Israeli military instructed him to care
for his patients,
who remained there, some of them, but they
didn't allow him to dress
before they did this, and they laughed because
all of his patients were children.
I
think about how disgusting that is
to making this man completely naked treat little
children.
I mean, this this is a special kind
of evil, guys. That's what this needs to
be clearly seen as. Not just terrorism.
As I've been making clear from the beginning
of this or post October 7th, this is
a special kind of evil. It's willful, it's
deliberate, they are laughing about it. And I'm
talking about the one specifically not every single
Israeli or every Jew. We're talking about Zionism
and what they're conducting, and what they're proudly
allowing, and what they've manipulated people into endorsing.
I'm talking about the majority of their population.
Saw him because he developed a terrible heel
ulcer from standing at gunpoint for days, then
migrating south to Rafa.
This man was so traumatized. I I honestly
can't imagine him ever practicing medicine again.
I am an eyewitness, Gaza.
Israel is committing genocide.
While our leaders remain impotent to act in
any meaningful way,
we demand an immediate lifting of the blockade
of humanitarian aid, an immediate two way arms
embargo,
compliance with the decisions of the International Court
of Justice.
This must be immediate.
The children of Gaza depend on it. Justin
Trudeau, Melanie Jolie, your inaction is complicity in
genocide.
Rage.
I'm fueled by a lot of rage. I
was in Gaza,
working in the ICU in Al Aqsa. She
hid a hospital for about 3 weeks. I
have been to Gaza twice,
since Then you've actually, you've seen them speak
already. In the interest of time, I'm gonna
end with this last one in the segment
about
the restricted use of munitions. Now they've all
told you.
Every everyone we've just talked about, they've all
now told you that they've seen
almost almost exclusively children
shot deliberately
while they're playing. I mean, this is a
designed effort.
Now realize that what they're using to shoot
these children
is designed to maximize the suffering of these
children.
Sidwa, a trauma surgeon who worked at the
European Hospital, said about half of the injuries
I took care of wearing young kids, we
saw a lot of so called splinter injuries
that were very, very small to the point
that you easily missed them while examining
Much, much smaller than anything I've seen before,
but they cause tremendous damage on the inside.
These weapons appear to be intentionally designed to
maximize casualties according to Amnesty International. 6 foreign
doctors who recently served at Gaza's hospitals confirmed
the presence of these fragmentation weapons. As doctor
Sidwa explained, children are more vulnerable to any
penetrating injury because they have smaller bodies, their
vital parts are smaller and easier to disrupt,
much smaller blood vessels which makes them very
hard to put back together. Another doctor said
that children hit by tiny pieces of shards
often died, and most of them lost limbs.
So what we're talking about
are simply illegal munitions
that are like, for example, butterfly bullets, which
is something that
Andy Martin has talked about in the past.
Ex or or known as expanding bullets or
dumb dumb. They are projectiles designed to expand
on impact,
causing severe damage to the flesh and the
bone. They're illegal because of that.
Israel has been shown to repeatedly use these.
It says Israel's defense forces used them against
Palestinians during the great March of Return.
Even though it was a crime, nobody cared,
nobody got held accountable for it. There was
countless children with, you know, blimps blown off
for standing out there protesting. I've shown you
the clips of them laughing about shooting the
children. Not after October 7th. Funny how that
works. Right? It's disgusting.
Now, I I was looking real quick to
see if there's anything that showed up in
our search. I quickly searched for butterfly bolts
on t lab, but I know I've talked
about it in the past.
This is what they're using.
To hurt and deliberately
to inflict pain on children.
Please share this.
Please get people to to look at all
these different clips of all these different doctors
telling you what's going on.
And remember, Twitter flagged this as
nudity sexual content, violence, or gore, or hateful
symbols, none of which exist in that.
Now I want to be clear, in the
later two tweets, there are those last examples
of the children, but that's not in the
video they tagged as the they they tagged
the one that has the most impact. The
doctor who almost breaks down crying. The first
four we showed you, which are just them
speaking in interviews. That's it.
That's the one. They didn't the other one
doesn't even get flagged as sensitive even though
that has actual images of gore. There's your
point to prove exactly what we're talking about.
Funny how the gore doesn't actually get flagged
as gore, but the impactful videos of doctors
saying they're exclusively targeting children, that gets flagged
as new as gore. Of course, it does.
Owen Jones points out the same. Dozens of
doctors, both Palestinian and western, have confirmed that
numerous young children have been killed by sniper
bullets to the head by Israelis.
Read that again. Fully digested. Consider the full
implications.
Do something about it.
It never stops every single day. I tag
this down here, but it's, of course, not
getting much reach.
Here's the clip we just played for you.
Now this is just showing you
a a a a headline or an article
from the Guardian from 2 the year 2000.
Or excuse me. 10 years old. Where nearly
2,000 Palestinians in Gaza were killed.
At the time, of course, the world stands
disgraced, it says. UK
at the at the time, Cameron, suspended arms
exports for
called for a ceasefire.
But now with a famine
and over 40,000 killed, the world watches and
the UK supports it.
How does that make sense?
Because it's just about what politically makes sense
at the time. They don't care about any
of your dynamic.
Khaleesi points out that 6 dead Israeli hostages
that the IDF retrieved yesterday were killed by
the IDF themselves according to
Israeli media. Here's one example. Likely killed as
a result of an IDF strike, which is,
by the way, what we've been hearing. Here's
this picture.
Here is Israel
pretending that they were killed by Hamas.
Isn't that funny how that works? Here's the
clip. Here's Israel right there. Look.
Now this one is from August 21st. Here
is the Times of Israel report from February
9th. Where you this is what they were
killed by IDF bombings, which is not a
unique reality. That's what everyone there is telling
you. And yet, here's Israel, yet, 2 days
ago, trying to tell you that this person
was killed by the by Hamas.
Everything they have is a lie.
Everything they're doing is about murdering Palestinians for
their benefit, and they're trying to as they
actually kill their own people, they're still trying
to lump that onto a group they funded
and put in power.
Hamas.
This woman,
Noah Arghamani, who was brought all the way
to the United States to gaslight Americans, apparently,
for Netanyahu to lie to congress, 58 standing
ovations, has now recognized how she's being used.
And she put this out on her Instagram.
It's right here. Go to look at it.
It says,
I can't ignore what happened here in the
media in the last 24 hours. Things have
been taken out of context. I was not
beaten and my hair was not cut. That's
what the media's been saying. She says, I
was in a building that was bombed by
the air force. The exact quote is, this
weekend after the shooting, as I said, I
had cuts all over my head, and I
was hurt all over my body. I emphasized
that I was not beaten, but injured all
over my body, but by the collapse of
the building on me.
See? As a victim of October 7th, October,
I will not allow myself to be victimized
once again by the media. So they're lying.
They're trying to pretend that she was hurt
by Hamas because that's the game. But the
reality is she was hurt by IDF bombs.
And repeatedly,
here's the video where you can listen to
again. She says the buildings were bombed by
IDF and she's worried they're gonna get killed
and they were treating her kindly. Like, she
says to this day.
But all they have are lies. That's the
whole point.
As the cradle covers, the the media is
desperately right now trying to use her as
this talking point when she's now come out
and said they're lying to you. How is
this still possibly happening when this is all
every angle of the media?
Here's an important discussion from Haaretz.
Smash Hamas versus bring them home. How Israeli
hostages became pawns in ugly political game.
Here's what it says.
On Tuesday,
Inab
Zangarkar,
who has become a prominent activist since her
son,
Matan, was taken hostage to Gaza, told a
civil commission investigating the events of October 7
that the head of Mossad
told her,
under this political constellation, a deal was unlikely.
This went around.
Barely an hour later, the prime minister's office
and the Mossad issued a joint statement denying
that those words were ever spoken. It's been
pretty clearly showing that they did say that.
And so and even Haratz here articles, it's
hard to imagine why this single mother from
working class town would have been, you know
and a stalwart supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu, by
the way,
would make this up. Either way, she believes
the politics of this government is an obstacle,
as do most of the Israeli population, it
seems. She recounted those first days in captivity,
this is another person who we're talking about
in regard to being in captivity, when the
hostages speculated about their fate. Perry said
had said it might be one of the
hostages at the time, that it might take
2 years to free them. Because quote, this
is what they said.
We're the left wing. This government doesn't care
about us.
Think about how disgusting that is as they're
using them to justify murdering more of them,
including Hamas and them, and Palestinians in general.
It says, I voted my whole life. She
go the other person responded. What do you
mean? I voted senator my whole life. Why
does that matter?
Obviously, because politics. Here's what it says.
In July,
IDI survey, a 56%
majority
of all Israelis preferred a deal to release
all the hostages in return for permanent ceasefire.
The majority of Israelis want what they're telling
you nobody wants. Telling you you're racist for
talking about. Telling you you're gonna not Hamas
win. Well, guess what? That's what your supposed
democracy wants. Guess it's not a democracy then.
It says the numbers don't always convey the
ugliness. Adena Moshe wept in the studio as
she recalled a demonstration by freed hostages.
People that were in Gaza who got home
and are now protesting for them to let
the rest go because they know what's happening.
They're being killed by the IDF.
That's what they're trying to tell Americans who
don't wanna hear it.
Just get this. So as these hostage are
protesting,
for the other hostage to come home, not
because,
give them back Hamas and on the side
of Israel's government. No. They're protesting the Israeli
government. They're saying stop using us as bargaining
chips and take any deal they offer. That's
what they're saying. The point is that they
were trying to do this, and a person
drove by, gave them the finger and yelled,
whores, it's a pity that you that you
released you.
But let's keep telling us how we're ones
being racist for asking for the same thing
the very hostages who came home want, and
people who are radical Israeli Zionists are screaming
that they should still be but, yeah, but
you're telling us we're that
I mean, think about how gross it is
to stand there acting like you're fighting for
them while your answer is it's a pity
they released you, whores, because you are on
the wrong side.
Like a Israeli Jew who doesn't like Zionism
is beat up and called not a Jew.
Funny how that's about Judaism, we're told. It
says from the start of the war, it
was clear that most of them wouldn't be
saved through army raids.
They all knew this, and they know it
now. But yet they keep pretending like doing
more of the same is gonna bring them
home. They know it's not. In fact, the
article goes on to make it clear that
they know they'll be dead. And the point
is, that's just the way it goes. Hamas
started it, so we have to fight for
the future.
That's what these people are actually saying.
And then but but at the same time,
America's government wants you to think this is
a ceasefire deal that Netanyahu wants to bring
the families home.
It's just so grotesquely dishonest in every way.
They all see it. They all know it.
Most people can see it too, but we're
led along by the 2 party illusion blind
followers.
It says when the first hostage release deal
became imminent in November, key parties in Netanyahu's
coalition came out firmly to oppose it. We
told you this at the time. The leaders
of the ultranationalist
parties, it's most of the people in this
government, Shmosis Ben Gavir, threatened to vote against
the first deal,
which, by the way, Ben Gavir actually did.
Since then, they've regularly
threatened
to bolt the government during pry, prior rounds
of negotiations. So here we are having Netanyahu
and then presented as Israel's on this. They're
not.
Their government is act they're going, we'll burn
this down before we let that happen. We're
never gonna stop fighting Hamas. After the November
deal failed to yield a new hostage, arrangement,
Israelis began to suspect
Netanyahu was generating obstacles.
Americans need to hear this. To keep his
government and himself in power.
It was hard to prove, but constantly repeated
in WhatsApp groups
in new studios, and new studios. Even top
war cabinet members were saying this. This belief
fused with long term fury at his alleged
corruption and assault on democracy
that ignited mass protests in re in recent
years. Yeah. Tell me more about that independent
judiciary,
Lindsey Graham. Tell me more about how that
works when everyone's telling you that they're all
broken, that there is no such thing in
this country because of what Netanyahu is doing.
The the major weekly pro hostage and pro
gover and anti government demonstrations,
because they're the same thing, in Tel Aviv
and around the country are openly ideological.
It says, in May, a man in Tel
Aviv held a sign that read, quote, the
fully right government is full full of blood.
My many
new graves on your watch.
They're talking about the hostages.
We need to recognize how unbelievably clear this
is.
They're telling you that they're killing their own,
that they're using this to achieve their own
political goals, and yet your government, by the
way, left or right,
are telling you that you're racist for trying
to stop this, that how dare you give
Hamas more control.
The only people bit that benefit from that
are Netanyahu and the government and the blind
supporters in this country that can't see through
the lies.
Here, look. This is from August 23rd.
Boxes of tomatoes were placed outside Masila Park
in Tel Aviv, and passerbys are happily throwing
them with portraits of the prime minister and
his cabinet.
Go on, Netanyahu. Go on, Blinken and all
the rest, Matt Miller. Keep telling us how
we're supporting Israel. They don't support it.
Same old one.
How Netanyahu
has systematically foiled talks to release hostages?
We're being gaslit by our own government for
a genocide.
Here's the old one from what is this?
From October from 10 months ago.
Defeating a mass is priority. Everything else is
secondary,
says Israel.
It's all there. We're just being lied to,
and your government is willfully going along with
it. Now this, I'm just gonna briefly point
out. I'm gonna wait for more to develop.
But this was reported a couple days ago.
Has it it hasn't been definitively shown to
be false, but they've denied it, but it
has been shown to be
conversations arose
saying it came from insiders, but then it
was denied by Trump and Benjamin at Yahoo.
So at this point, it's hard to tell
because we know that that would be denied
even if it was admitted. Donald Trump accused
of committing massive crime with calling Benjamin Netanyahu
as they claim
and asking him to prolong the deal until
he gets elected because they don't want it
to benefit Kamala.
Now Netanyahu and Trump both denied
it. So maybe it's a it's maybe it's
the democrats making it up to hurt their
campaign. But let's be real about this. You
know they're gonna deny it because it hurts
Trump, and you know the democrats are gonna
believe it because it hurts Trump.
Right? It's very easy to see. But either
way would make sense. It's obviously possible he
would do this. Anyone pretending that's not possible
is ridiculous.
And obviously, the democrats would make this up
like any side. The right would make up
anything they want about the left. They all
do it. So what's interesting to me is
that we have to wait and see if
we can get anything more to prove it.
But the weird game we're seeing about how
the left, the right is acting like this
has already been disproven because we know we'll
see, Trump denied it. It's like, are we
really this much? Well, you can't be this
childish. It's silly to me how we act
with these people. Like, these are it's it's
the hero worship. It's what it is.
Now what's funny about this, Blinken
sent in ceasefire talks to death, it says,
with comments on Netanyahu.
Now it says senator Blinken comments about Gaza
ceasefire talks this week, sentenced the negotiations to
death according to the Middle East eye. After
meeting with Ben with Netanyahu on Monday, Blinken
said the Israeli leader agreed to a new
proposal and that it was now up to
Hamas. Now we already broke down how stupidly
obviously this wasn't the case. He says, however,
the US proposal included
new demands from Netanyahu that Hamas considers unacceptable.
And in fact, directly challenges the framework that
was laid out by the United Nations. So
obviously, Israel and Blinken and the US government
are just making sure this doesn't happen, which
as we are hoping we're seeing by now,
everyone recognizes in Israel.
It says,
Israel, US, and Arab sources
have all said Netanyahu's demands are too hard
line and will prevent a deal right there.
Everyone involved except
Blinken, Biden, Kamala, Netanyahu. And, really, if it
in this case, if Trump was in power,
it'd be the same thing. It's the power
ship or the leadership, I mean, powership is
the way to say that, and and and
Israel's government. But the reality from all the
mediators, Qatar and whoever included, what he's doing
is guaranteed to make sure it doesn't happen.
So
multiple times I've shown you it was about
to happen and then they added something new
or they pulled back.
It's just it's a it's it's insulting to
your intelligence to pretend like it's not exactly
what it looks like. That they don't want
it. We know they don't want it. Their
own government says they don't want it. Their
own population says they don't they're trying not
to let it happen. And yet we're supposed
to believe, like, it's only Hamas stopping it
despite all the evidence. It says sources speaking
to YNET slammed Blinken for making the comments
that portrayed Hamas as the obstacle.
That says and guys, this is this is
Israeli media. It says quote, Blinken made a
serious foul here that indicates innocence, amateurism,
naivety, and a lack of understanding. Now I
think it's maybe all of those or some
of them, but really he's lying for Israel.
That's it. He's not he's not confused, he's
not uninformed, he just lies for Israel. It
says they added that Blinken's positive spin on
the ceasefire negotiations was likely an effort to
prevent the situation from overshadowing
the Democratic National Convention. Okay. So the point
is, if you're willing to go, there's no
way Trump would do that because it
it's the same thing either way. Here we
have the argument being made, which we also
can't prove, that he did this to
to hold this off until after the convention
because they didn't wanna hurt themselves politically. Well,
if you that's the same thing in reverse,
that Trump would have them hold it off
to benefit them politically. If we can't acknowledge
that either side are every way capable of
this,
you're lost in the 2 party illusion.
Now,
Robert wrote an excellent article. The US backed
Gaza ceasefire talks are a complete sham. It's
easy to see. Read this and you'll be
convinced.
Here is another article from Israeli media. A
kidnapped family member to Netanyahu. Now it's a
translation, so it's a kidnap hostage, what they're
talking about. The main point,
if you read Hebrew, read it like that
because the translation gets all wonky. The point
is, they asked them,
a a member, a family member of a
hostage member asked Netanyahu,
sign the deal. That's what they keep saying.
And again, this is the whole point. They're
not saying beat Hamas first, then sign the
deal. They're saying, sign the effing deal.
Hamas is the point is our family members.
Guess what he responded as? What deal?
What's on the agenda? What deal? That's actually
what he said.
Showing you that he's propelling me. What deal?
There's no deal. That's the truth to them.
And their own government is saying that. We're
not doing anything until we beat Hamas. That's
what I just showed you from day 1.
Everything is secondary. So the only thing they're
adding to the deal is, well, we have
to beat Hamas first. So the point is,
you don't want a ceasefire. You can't have
a ceasefire with a group that you wanna
destroy first.
I mean, that's that's rudimentary,
guys. Anyone with a brain and honesty can
see that.
Now, as we already showed you, and I
said exactly like anyone paying attention already knew
this would go, US media and political manipulators
all claimed that Hamas was the reason this
was held up, and yet again, Israeli media
proves them wrong.
This was after. We are the last conversation
we had about this, this was a follow-up.
This is from 20th.
Duped again, the US somehow heard Netanyahu say
yes. A Gaza deal to a deal. He
did not
write horets.
So my point again, this is not an
accident. That wasn't a mistake. They didn't hear
him say something. They're lying to you. They
know it. Their media knows it. Their people
know it. They're gaslighting the American public. Now
turn around for a second and ask yourself
why the focus of this intense propaganda is
only aimed at Americans.
Isn't that strange? It's not strange if you're
paying attention to our work because you are
the focal point of a lot of this,
the focal point of Israel using the Amer
the US military to achieve its political ends
in Middle East. They need to keep you
fighting each other or blind the picture so
they can keep this happening.
That's what's happening, and they're lying to you.
Here's what I said under Michael oh, well,
first, this is Mariam from 972 magazine.
The US doesn't, quote, accept Israel's occupation,
or rather this says, the key moment from
Blinken's gaggle
that just wrapped in Doha and Cutter is
his reaff reaffirmation that the United States does
not accept the long term occupation of Gaza,
and that the US plan put forward details,
clear schedules, location for the idea of withdrawal.
You know you know why this is a
like, again, he knows he's lying to you.
Like, improve it. Because, I mean, look at
the guy. This guy looks like he's been
aged 45 years 2 days.
Because
Israel, as we just showed, they're on the
surface.
We will not do that. We are going
to occupy the and and they're they are
currently, politically, in every other way. They're gonna
put boots on the ground to further
actually take the territory for new settlements, and
they're all telling you that. Every single one
of them, including Netanyahu,
for the foreseeable future.
So he's doing this to convince Americans that's
not true. So here's Blinken,
supposed mem representative of the US government, openly
acting for the interest of the Israeli government
to manipulate Americans
for to your detriment.
And here is a writer for the US
Israeli media. The US doesn't, quote, accept Israel's
occupation and settlement of the West Bank either,
but here we are. Yeah.
For decades decades.
We don't accept and agree like Patel was
doing. But yet it keeps happening. So what
you're doing is meaningless. Yep. Pretty much. So
all they're doing is gaslighting you to keep
this going, just like with the war, just
like with the genocide right now. It's becoming
increasingly clear, she says, that Netanyahu and his
coalition are in fact planning the long term
occupation. Listen up.
It says that's what security control is.
But here's Blinken lying to you for the
interest of the Israeli Zionist government.
Now, as Michael Rapaport stupidly said the other
day, this dumb ape just turned down another
ceasefire deal.
Nope. Here's the Israeli media saying that you've
been duped, moron, but doesn't care. Because I
think he's lying. I think he knows this
and doesn't care. Like I said, beneath that.
I said, well, oh, weird. No comment. Almost
like you don't care that you were wrong,
lying.
That's the truth.
Guys, he knows this. There's no way around
it. How many times he's posted things that
immediately showed me the opposite?
Michael Rapaport is a deliberate liar for the
Israeli government, like a lot of these people
are. It's pretty obvious.
Now I'm gonna skip this for time, but
this is just Elif Ocampos
making this out to be like, Elon Omar
who I don't support is simply saying if
you wanna cease fire, stop arming them. It's
simple. And she'd somehow turned that into hating
Jews.
Not kidding.
Here's her full speech, by the way, which,
again, is pretty pretty it's accurate. What she's
saying is true, whether you support her or
not. But here's the point from Middle East
monitor,
from the deal itself. What this is exactly
what I was just telling you. Here just
the main point. The deal that they're pretending
that is up for Hamas
also allows Israel to continue to occupy
the Nazarom core, corridor, which divides Gaza Strip
in 2. So that main part they did
out of the middle to complete that so
that's right in the middle of Gaza Strip.
They're gonna keep occupying that with about a
1000000 displaced people in from Northern Gaza sealed
off from the south. That's a way to
control, and now there's there's another checkpoint they
have to cross through of the and so
why so you just turn the it is
occupied for for the foreseeable future like they're
telling you. And it says,
allowing Netanyahu to use them as a bargaining
chip in further negotiations.
So how in the world does that stop?
And again, on top of that, explicitly stated
they're not gonna stop fighting Hamas. And they
want you to pretend this equals ceasefire. Hamas
says no to it.
That is a either special kind of stupid
or a very, very evil dishonesty.
Now here is the US government pretending.
Here's what she says.
Thomas Greenfield, 2,000,000,000 people live in conflict affected
areas. Our charge must be to stop anyone
from experiencing the hell of war.
Well, as she says, all rod says, you've
literally vetoed UN resolutions
calling to stop this hell that is war
more than once.
Disgusting person.
And we've talked about this in the past.
The illusion of the altruistic US government has
been dismantled by the ongoing Israeli genocide.
In general, the displacement doesn't stop.
I mean, if you this is unreal, this
picture.
All these people pushed to the beach,
displaced. And as I said, this is heartbreaking.
Remember when numerous Israeli officials to this day,
by the way, publicly state, drive them into
the sea? Well, here we are.
Keep telling me about this this fighting terrorism
as we watch the most obvious form of
terrorism play out right in front of us.
They are driving these people
anywhere but they're murdering these people.
In foul in 45 different disgusting ways, they
are driving them to desperation.
Murder, rape, pillage, destruction.
UNRA points out that so far, just this
month, they've issued 12 evacuation orders. And I'm
sure I think it's more than that based
on other reports I've seen. But either way,
12
in 23 days.
Imagine being that that, you know, that's one
every 2 days or more. They're telling you,
hey. Look. Move here. Grab everything you have
and move here. And and before they're even
done setting up, okay. Now move over there.
And by the way, bombing where they are,
shooting and bombing on the way, and bombing
before they even get there. As every single
moment of this entire disgusting thing, they've been
proven to do that. Even for the 1st
week, Egypt showed you they're bombing the crossing.
They're bombing where they were going. They're bombing
the aid trucks. Egypt reported that.
On top of that,
here they are, right up against the water.
So they push them onto the beach. Now
just place Palestinians to set up their fragile
tents right next to the waves after the
occupation issued new orders to evacuate more parts
of Khan Yunus, leaving them trapped between the
sea and the bombing.
Sure seems like just by design to me.
Now here is another disgusting individual,
an Israeli
speaking on, about the people in these in
these tents.
Here's what he says, guys.
A city of tents,
they should also be burned.
Make sure you recognize these disgusting people.
These people deserve to be called out.
You know what this says? It says, Benjamin
Netanyahu Donald Trump. That's what it says.
Just it's unreal.
And yet this is okay. Right? So here's
a guy openly calling for murder. No big
deal on Twitter, but you suggest you you
talk about children being murdered. Oh, that's too
sensitive for this platform.
Disgusting.
Here's his plot. Here's his actual oh, here's
this. If you wanna see it.
Benjamin Netanyahu. I think this is prime minister.
Oh, just as Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump.
Maybe listen. Maybe recognize how alarming that is.
These people are proudly demonstrating these so the
support for both of them while going murder
all those innocent children in those tents.
Hooray.
Now as Abby Martin points out, as we
were just showing you, the disgusting long line
of people being displaced over and over and
over and over. And she's and I said,
as Biden continues to lie about Trump's both
sides comment regarding Charlottesville,
Biden has a both sides moment of his
own. Only this time, there's no misrepresentation.
Whereas,
she's pointing out
here's Joe Biden on Gaza at the DNC.
Those protesters out in the street, they have
a plot a point. A lot of innocent
people are being killed on both sides.
No. No. Not really. As she says, both
sides. Well, here's Israel
Having a nice day on the beach.
Same moment. Here's Palestine.
Sort of not both sides, really. Despite what
happened on October 7th, the people were killed.
And despite the fact that IDF killed a
whole portion of them, point is
passed that moment forward over the last 75
years, it's pretty hard to say both sides.
Here is a picture from 1950, 1956
in Gaza. Oh, look at that. Another child
missing 2 limbs.
Always been a war on children, as we're
now hopefully beginning to recognize. Jonathan Cook says,
Israel just keeps widening the circle of terrorists,
in quotes, from Hamas to the entire Palestinian
people, to the United Nations, to UNRWA, to
Doctors Without Borders, to just anybody that's criticizing
them. Right? To the International Court of Justice,
to the International Criminal Court. He asked a
very valid question, who I which I hope
people can think about.
How long before I'm declared a terrorist? How
long before you're declared a terrorist?
Simply for being probably already happening.
Now in the West Bank, we're also seeing
the same displacement. In the West Bank,
the same displacement, the same burning of homes,
the same burning of people alive by settlers
that's happened since October 7th. We're seeing the
same this is a destruction of Palestine.
Largest forcible transfer in the West Bank
due to settler violence, according to the Norwegian
Refugee Council.
They just don't care, guys. They don't care.
A total of 10,200
Palestinians
have been arrested by Israeli forces, not in
Gaza, just in the West Bank alone since
October 7th. 10,200.
You know why? Because they're grounding them up
rounding them up before they have to let
some of them go. It's the same thing
they did last time.
I prove this to you. Everyone can see
what's happening and people just don't wanna admit
it.
Here is a member of the Israeli government
saying as far as I'm concerned, we need
a nuclear carrying ballistic missile. IDF is now
annihilating Gaza.
You know what that is? That's impunity.
Probably missed this,
not,
inaccurate.
I hope they end up in prison. If
there's any justice in the world, but think
about this. She's speaking on public talking she's
on a radio on a mainstream channel.
Use a nuclear bomb. Annihilate all of them.
This is the woman that said children are
guilty in front of the Knesset when they're
born.
These are horrible, villainous people, guys. They need
to be called out.
And here's a long thread of IDF members
personally documenting
every crime you can imagine. Human shields to
demolishing crops and and cemeteries to just everything.
All on the record proudly laughing about it
on social media. That's how obvious this is.
Now Israel is also carrying out air strikes
continuously against Lebanon, an area that they're also
illegally occupying. So when Lebanon continues to strike,
they don't need a justification. They're illegally occupied.
That is a legal act of armed resistance.
Now if they're talking civilians, that's a crime.
But here's an interesting point to make. Because
the point is here, Israel's carried out air
strikes against southern Lebanon's city of Sedan on
Wednesday and every other day in general. And
every time they kill civilians. Every time they
target civilian infrastructure. Every time.
Now, Lebanon bought bombed back. But here's what's
interesting.
Israel now there's a question about settlers.
And it's a valid question about what what
line that stand which line that is what
side that's on. But Israel, since October 7th,
has given these settlers
official capacity.
They've given them weapons. They've made them an
official at part of the military structure. So
they are legal military targets.
Now you could and again, peep you could
make an argument how they might have been
before. Now it's a fair hard line to
mock. I I try to on the side
of, you know, the obvious. But the point
is that these people are occupying
land that is not theirs. That's why they're
illegal settlers. Under everybody's understanding, even the United
States government,
whether it's Gaza, West Bank, or
Lebanon, or Syria for that matter, Golan Heights.
It's all illegal occupation. So and again, funny
how they love to make Iran and everybody
else about taking over territory while they're literally
occupying 4 different countries. The point
is that these people got bombed
because they're bombing because Israel's bombing them, and
they're using these people as their human shield
barrier, and that they were also on Lebanese
territory as illegal settlers who have been given
official capacity. Is Lebanon bombs these areas.
And first of all, just people taking pleasure
in the fact that they're fleeing their illegally
occupied homes on stolen property.
All these different videos of them talking about
this. Both and and by the way, this
is bombing in in,
the for to be let me I'm mixing
these stories, by the way. So we've had
this, of Israel bombing Lebanon. We've had multiple
examples of them bombing into these occupied Lebanese
territories. These 2 are from the Golan Heights.
So it's the same conversation. But the point
is that you have illegal settler occupied
occupied areas, and this is Hezbollah. So that's
where the point got overlapped.
Hezbollah bombing in the Golan Heights area.
Illegal territory. So any case, the point is
people highlighting this is happening. Here's how they
respond.
Hey, Mazig, who's got who has me blocked
because I routinely made him look like the
fool he is while he lied about the
stuff like this. But get this. As Tiberias
just says screaming.
And this guy says, this isn't a joke,
guys. Hen Mazig literally tweeted, 2 homes
in Matula
were directly
hit by Hezbollah anti tank missiles.
Attacking a residential building is a war crime.
This moron actually had the gall to say
that. Well, Israel has flattened 99%
of what's going on in Gaza.
Now, I can prove to you how many
of those did not have whatever they claimed
they're bombing. But whatever, even if you say
every one of them had a tunnel,
the point is he's right. Even if there
were things under there, it doesn't matter. They're
collectively punishing the entire area. But these people
are that disgusting, Willing to stand on that
high whore moral ground and act like you're
the one breaking the law while you ignore
everything we're doing. It really does kill me
that they're getting away with this, at least
in the in the real time.
Getting away in the long term is about
whether they go to prison or not. But
right this moment, they are actively murdering people
and it doesn't seem like anybody's trying to
stop them.
Now, as we can see though, regardless, they
are losing.
Whether it's about just generally in war, because
they are, which is easy to prove despite
all the lies. But just in general, the
Zionist organization in Israel that they're using
is completely being dismantled by their own actions.
And we talked about the blood diamond industry
going through Israel, which is shockingly obvious,
and they use child labor.
And what's crazy about it, there's human rights
articles about this. It's undeniably
true. But you're not allowed to talk about
it because you're racist, apparently. Israel diamond exchange
in crisis as exports plummet in 20 24.
I wonder why. The world
is boycotting Israel.
That's what you're watching right now. Here is
a clip by Mint Press News. The Israeli
general wrote in Haaretz,
in a controversial piece. He says, Israel will
collapse in a year,
far closer than that, I think, if it
continues fighting Hamas and Hezbollah. So as we're
sick so this is Galam. Even though he's
the lunatic,
he is at least have some he's a
counterbalance to the actual the, like, over the
the the far more crazy people. The Gavir
and Smotrich who are pushing and openly asking,
calling for a regional war.
They don't care. I think they think this
is gonna drive in some kind of prophetic
end. He is going, look, we're gonna destroy
the country. They're going, go who cares? We're
gonna bring all the end times.
It's been it's it's crazy. And your government
is letting this happen.
But he's trying to, hey. We're gonna destroy
the country.
Point.
Oh, thank you to k god here for
pointing this out. Appreciate that.
Point is, he's right. And it's happening in
front of us right now. Here's a great
clip Ryan Raspiani pointed out from and this
is from breaking points.
Little bit sped up, but good good clip.
About 3 minutes. So what listen to this.
There this is Israel collapsing.
Not in a long time in real time.
That's not the one. Here we go. Economic
calamity that threatens to collapse the state entirely.
Quote, over 46 1,000 businesses have gone bankrupt,
tourism has stopped, Israel's credit rating was lowered,
Israeli bonds are sold at the prices of
almost junk bond levels, and the foreign investments
that have already dropped by 60% in the
Q1 of 2023, as a result of the
policies of Israel's far right government before October
7th, show no prospects of recovery. The majority
of the money invested in Israeli investment funds
was diverted to investments abroad because Israelis do
not want their own pension funds and insurance
funds or their own savings to be tied
to the fate of the state of Israel.
Now That's really important. That shows you that
the Israeli people
are aren't really truly even that invested in
the idea of Israel. Like, the idea that
we're like, well, we don't wanna invest here
just in case because we see it failing.
We're gonna bring our money outside the country.
Isn't that nice to be able to do
that? Ask all the people in Gaza if
they'd like to do that. They most of
them wouldn't. They wanna stay in their territory.
The point is the luxury of having that
choice. Or the idea of any other country
we're talking about. All the poor people that
you've suppressed, occupied, and destroyed.
They'll just get to up and travel to
their other home in New York. Not how
that works.
Those business closures, they may actually just be
the beginning. An estimate cited by The Times
of Israel found that up to 60,000 businesses
might close before 2024 is over. Wow. This
is a greater impact than the COVID pandemic
shutdown, and would only be exacerbated by an
expanded war with Hezbollah and with Iran, the
impacts of which, frankly, would be unfathomable.
Just think about the realities right now though
for the Israeli economy. Israeli workers have been
called up to participate in the Gaza annihilation,
undercutting the country's much celebrated tech sector. Another
key sector, tourism, has completely dried up. Construction
is at a standstill because the Palestinians that
Israel relies on as cheap labor force have
been banned from coming to work outside of
the occupied territories. Israeli attempts to import foreign
workers as a new source of cheap labor
have been largely unsuccessful.
Turkey has announced a ban on exports to
Israel, further crippling the construction industry. And efforts
to import from other nations are hampered by
the efforts of the Houthis to block shipping
into Israeli ports.
250,000
Israelis continue to be internally displaced as a
result of the tit for tat war with
Hezbollah. And panic has set in as Iran
threatens a large response to the assassination of
Isma'il Haniyah that occurred on their soil. Now,
perhaps the biggest body blow, however, was Intel
pulling out of a planned $25,000,000,000
investment in the state of Israel. Wow. An
indication that capital is engaged in their own
self interested BDS, weighing the ever risking risks
ever rising risks of operating in Israel to
be greater than the benefit. Now this is
my point. This is what I've been saying
for this whole time. I don't believe for
a second that Intel or any of the
rest of them are doing this because they
have a moral compass. But quite frankly, I
think that they're right now grinding their teeth
about how they know Israel's gonna punish them
for doing that. But it's it's about the
writing on the wall. They see the shifting.
They see it's it's not it's not like
the media aspect of opportunism.
I mean, to a degree. But, like, from
the media perspective, I recognize that in their
they can see an opportunity in trying to
gain back some kind of following and clout,
but it's also because if they keep lying
for Israel, eventually that that benefit will dry
out because Israel's losing in ability to give
them anything. So if they they just go,
well, we're we have to lean into the
other side of this. So right now with
Intel, I think the point is, well, we
recognize that we can't just follow them into
the ground. We have to make sure we
keep our business going so they weigh the
option. And we're at the breaking point, like
the show right now, where they're recognizing, okay,
wait, we're gonna get a negative because of
Israel. We know they're gonna punish us. Call
us antisemites or whatever. Use their other surreptious
actions to vent to hurt what we're doing
because we're bucking them.
But the overall
loss with by sticking with them is far
worse.
So
we we we pull it. We go somewhere
else. So you'd be sorry, Paul, like, they
this is a business decision at the end
of the day. And the point is it
shows you that they see what's happening.
And most of these businesses don't care about
where they're like, the blood diamond industry, they
don't ultimately care. They care of the you
think they care. That's what it comes down
to. Even more trouble though could be ahead.
Here again is Mondo Weiss. Israel's power grid,
which has largely switched to natural gas, still
depends on coal to supply demand. The biggest
supplier of coal to Israel is Colombia, which
announced that it would suspend coal shipments to
Israel as long as the genocide was ongoing.
After Colombia, the next two biggest suppliers are
South Africa and Russia. Without reliable and continuous
electricity, Israel will no longer be able pretend
to be a developed economy. Wow. So while
the US will apparently never cut Israel off
of literally anything, including the £2,000 bombs that
they use to drop on schools where displaced
children are sheltering, the rest of the world,
apparently, not so keen to continue doing business
with this terrorist regime. There's another dynamic that's
a little harder to quantify here though. It
came up in our recent interview with an
Israeli Zionist analyst, Shail Ben Afram, who we
brought in to discuss the right wing riots
that broke down in Israel to protect the
right of Israeli soldiers to rape and torture
Palestinian detainees. I think there's gonna be a
lot of people in in Israel
who, if this continues to be the kind
of government that they have in the long
term, will leave, and those will be the
most productive members of society. Those will be
the high-tech leaders. Those will be the professors.
Those will be the,
the literati and and so on and so
forth, which is something that I think the
extreme right Israel wants because that will help
them run the country better. And then so
it's an attempt to dismantle the Israeli judicial
system because that's the one check and balance
Israeli system has. Again
Right.
Now that's the point that I'm gonna make
on the way out here that I think
is important. The one we keep we've made
many times because Lindsey Graham and the rest
of them tell you, look. The ICC or
the ICC, they don't have any authority over
Israel because they have an independent judiciary. But
guess what? They don't.
Because it's obvious. That's one of the reasons
the the Israeli society has been pushing back
against Netanyahu because that's what they're driving for.
Now I've shown this in the past. The
article from 2018. Now this is a a
pretty, a well known Canadian supreme court justice
who was telling you, without an independent judiciary,
Israel's cherished democracy will be at risk. Now
what she's highlighting in this article are things
that are about to happen. And if they
are to happen, this will destroy it. Guess
what? It's already happened. They've already happened. We're
past that. Now this is why people are
upset. This is why Netanyahu is being threatened.
And this is why because he's destroying the
country. He's driving them into a theocracy where
their ultimate blind extremist religious mindset, their prophetic
drive are is ultimately what has control, and
they can use their own power to just
circumvent the Jew the actual
accountability of the judiciary. And that's the overall
point we make in this discussion. We talk
about it in this show here. But here's
AIPAC making the same point, that they're not
allowed to do this because we have an
independent judiciary. But they don't. Here's other articles
from PBS News. 1,000 in Israel protest the
far right government's plan to weaken the judiciary.
That's 2023.
Even further. Now here's a clip we break
down saying, senator Lindsey Graham doing what he
does best, gaslighting the American people, this is
truly despicable. And it's about that exact point.
He denounces the ICC's arrest warrants because they
have an independent judiciary. But you can look
in every possible way. Not even the clip
we just played for you where the the
Zionist pro the one the they're talking about
this as an expert is telling you that
that's what they're talking about. It's already happened.
They've already broke this stuff down, and they
are in decline, in a rapid fall right
now.
But your government, to this very moment, is
not only
supporting the genocide, they're arming them, they're high
fiving what they're doing, they're watching this fall
apart.
Now this message at the end from a
from a Jewish rabbi,
from from the from Brooklyn, New York. He
says, according to the Torah, the state of
Israel is not permitted to exist during our
time in exile. Israeli leaders do not represent
the Jewish people, Judaism is not Zionism. Now
his point is about the idea of what
the Balfour declaration took the place of, where
Zionist and Herzl
Theo Herzl, who was an atheist,
used and took control of the Jewish population
or, you know, manipulated them by pretending this
happened, which is ultimately what they're what he's
saying. But right now, they're in exile. The
point is that when God returns,
that's when this happens.
That's what they stepped in right there and
just made it happen. The Balfour Declaration, the
Rothschilds, they said, here,
take this, Zionist, here's Palestine.
Like, it's not God doing that. Choosing between
multiple locations. So how we can pretend, as
we know that as a fact, that that's
where this began. Well, you look what he's
telling you is that that's not the reality.
It's not supposed to happen until the actual
returning of the messiah, not when they force
it in genetically manufacturing
red calves. Like, it's crazy how weird this
is.
And the real
Orthodox Jews of the world, and I shouldn't
say it like that because I'm sure there
are real Jews who just are blinded by
Zionism, but the people that understand how Zionism
is a manipulation of Judaism or Christianity for
that matter are just trying to tell you
the truth.
This is not what's happening. You're being played.
So as they're lying about the judiciary, as
they're lying about the religion, they're lying about
everything, your government in the United States, in
the UK, and all around the world are
allowing this to continue.
They're cheering it on, guys, as you see
them doing it. What how is that possible?
As every single candidate in this country, probably
in the others as well, are all Zionist
entities.
If we can't see what a problem that
is while they're openly high fiving about their
genocide in front of you, then I I
don't know what else to tell you. But
I'm hoping this is reaching enough people to
where we can call this out. Call out
the leaderships in the parties. Call out the
people running for president, call out anybody who
is acting like this is not the obvious
point that we should be focusing on. And
I mean, like, from the American perspective if
you're talking about the election. But from a
human species perspective,
the ongoing genocide of human beings.
But thank you for continuing to fight for
this because I know
if you just have a if you have
compassion, if you have any level of empathy
for human life, I know this is bothering
you. So thank you for continuing to struggle
through it. The point is, guys, that we're
fighting for positive change. We're fighting to see
this never happening. You know? And they point
that to say never again is something that's
a little bit lofty in general because history
always repeats itself. But the point is that
we need to stand against it wherever it
turns up, whenever it turns up. That's the
that's the mantra. Never allow it to happen
in the 1st place. We need to be
able to see this, and quite frankly, we
all did. The power structure just didn't care.
That's what we need to focus on.
Thank you for tuning in, guys. Thank you
for your support. As always, guys, we are
in a position right now where we need
your support.
Please put them in the chat so they
can see them whether we're talking about our
give send go campaign or star our donation
portal on the website itself or any number
of the platforms you're on right now. Rockfin
or Rumble or Odysee, every one of them
allow you to donate to the platform. So
help us out. We're trying to continue to
fight, and we're going to. Believe in us.
We believe in you. I love you all.
As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.