The investigation was done by the San Francisco,
District Attorney's Office. Among the data that came
out was that they would,
spy on organizations
that were critical of Israel, spy on organizations,
that were critical of South Africa.
And they would pass that information on to
Israel, and they pass the information on to
South Africa. This is an apartheid South Africa.
According to a declassified FBI document,
one prominent investigator working on behalf of the
ADL was Ray Bullock, a San Franciscan with
the code name Kao,
who posed as a small time art dealer
in the Castro District. Working clandestinely with Bullock
was Thomas Girard, a detective with the San
Francisco Police Department's intelligence unit and a 3
year veteran of the CIA.
Bamford wrote that, quote, Girard would illegally supply
Bullock with confidential data from the police and
FBI computer files about Americans, many of them
pro Palestinian activists that were targets of the
ADL. His reports were then submitted to the
ADL's executive director in San Francisco, Richard Hirschotte.
Court documents ultimately exposed that Bullock and or
Hershoft
admitted that the ADL or its agents gave
information to the government of Israel
and sold information to the government of South
Africa,
including information secretly collected from Jewish peace groups.
Is that
anti Semitic?
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent
news as we see it from the last
24 hours.
Wednesday, August 21, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
That clip obviously was from a recent interview
or actually from the documentary we I interviewed
James Lee about that James Lee did a
really great job on. About 22 minutes, mini
doc on ADL,
which he clearly finds as, I think, the
evidence undeniably shows that it's essentially in a
spy agency for Israel.
Now we've talked a lot about APAC
being and I'll I'll go through this the
APAC part of this again today to start,
actually,
being a very obvious I mean, right right
on Wikipedia for you. And as always, not
that that means it's true, just simply shows
mass adoption. The reality being that APAC was
an Israeli entity. It is still to this
very day. It was created as such. They
changed the name to to alter the perception
about that being the case.
And the overlap with JFK, the FARA act,
the registering as a foreign agent, how that
played a factor there. We're gonna discuss some
leaked documents
that, Li Feng and others on his Substack,
but overlapping some Guardian information that has now
been kinda picked up on a lot of
different platforms around leaked documents from Israel from
2018.
And this came out about 17th, I believe.
I want to talk about this for a
few days.
And showing that this is something that Israel
was petitioning, not just US entities and the
government, but legal aspects of the DNC and
different aspects of our government
to try to find a way around that.
And there's really no way to misunderstand what
this all shows you. And, also, we already
know from all the other things we've discussed
that this is as I can't stop seeing
right now,
this is the issue of our times, guys.
And this is not about Israelis in particular
or Jews in particular. This is about Zionism
and, really, just political infiltration
in a very surreptitious way that I'm seeing
everywhere right now on steroids
in this recent political fervor coming up to
the election.
That's always really been there. This is not
a new tactic. You know, the whole Lennon
quote from leading the opposition from within. The
point being, if you wanna manipulate a group,
the best way to do so is to
become a part of it and lead into
the ground from within without that being made
aware to everyone around you. This is a
classic idea.
So this idea of a larger understanding of
what Zionism has been been
since it's,
I guess, as Avi Shalam puts it, the
territorial
since it was given territorial dimensions. Being something
that existed before that, but since the state
of Israel's creation forward on the
on top of Palestine,
what that has done to the world and
what we're now clearly seeing kind of meltdown
in front of everybody.
To make this only about one religion or
even one country, as much as there's obvious
overlaps to those things, is shortsighted.
And I argue we'll only allow this to
continue. And so today, we're gonna go through
the obvious information around why this is so
important. And, really, as it's it would be
impossible to try to
do all of this in one show.
Hopefully, you've been following along and looking at
the different parts of this. This is only
one aspect to a much larger conversation
around how obvious this is, not just to
US politics, but far more going on around
the world. And even as it is being
exposed
and and clearly diminishing in regard to its
influence to average people, it seems as if
it's going over on overdrive to
maintain that influence politically with people in power.
And I just it's it's really everywhere. Now
I wanted to make a point about that
first,
that I truly see this as something that
we need as a as the world to
acknowledge
is not it's sort of like a like,
let's let's it's a hard conversation to start
with, to get into historical discussions like World
War 2 and the idea of the, you
know, never again and the conversation around that
and realizing that there were obvious atrocities that
were committed, but we have been misled so
aggressively about what ultimately happened.
Zionism, in particular, aligning itself with the Nazi
organization.
And and all of this stuff doesn't make
much sense until you look at the bigger
picture. The point is that whatever happened at
that point, what happened from there was the
the understanding, you know, the world. Never again.
We're not gonna allow that to happen again.
The problem is that right from that point
forward, we were not stepping into something with
an honest with an honest direction. The people
that were at least in part responsible are
coming from within that, like, working with these
groups. And, again, this goes with the US
background as well, understanding who was actually funding
different sides of this war, people that were
involved with the USI, where eugenics as a
mindset actually began in the United States. The
point is that to this point now, we
can look back and realize, okay. So we
weren't actually or rather, the people in power
were actually interested in never again. They weren't
actually interested in positive change. They were interested
in putting you in the belief that that's
what was happening. So right now, my point
is if we truly want a better direction,
and this applies to 2 party politics in
this country or on a world scale, what
we're seeing with Israel. If we want something
better, as I feel like we all do,
or anybody honest out there whether you think
left or right will accomplish that, the honest
people out there want something positive. That's why
they pretend to be positive. And if we
want that, we need to see this change.
We need to see this open up. We
need to dissect this. We need to discuss
this without worries of being called racist for
simply highlighting static objective realities.
So
today, that's the overall objective for this one
part of the conversation is to expose
how clear this really is, how it influences
immediate policy that's taking place, and how the
left right politics in this country, as well
as other countries, but we're focused this at
this point on US politics,
is overwhelmed
by this manipulation. And this is how I
see it. Of course, I could be wrong,
but I want you to at least be
able to entertain these possible data points and
ask yourself how this possibly adds up, how
possibly
one side or the other are going to
make a difference when both of them are
blindly pro Zionist and have all publicly said
that they would continue supporting Israel. Now the
American perspective is not that the Israel dynamic
is the most important thing to what's happening
in this country. But if we're unable to
see how Israel and the influence
around the world, but specifically in the United
States, is directly influencing, if not hindering, what
you think is happening,
then you just don't want to acknowledge it.
I mean, it's literally on the surface of
the conversation. So my point in saying all
of that is that we need to deal
with that first before we can even begin
to discuss what might happen if we believe
our political system is the living embodiment of
our will, which is a whole another conversation.
So I wanna start today. Oh, and the
other thing I was gonna say as well
was
people, so I saw a comment the other
day that really struck me.
Somebody was making a point about how and
I've I've gotten this a lot, and I'm
proud of this, about during the COVID 19
conversation, how what we were discussing and and
our, you know, message of unity, really, more
than anything,
save people.
This message this this
comment in particular said that we've saved their
lives. Because, you know, what? We were a
raft in the middle of the insanity that
allowed them to see past, which there were
a lot of us out there doing this.
My point in saying that now is that
I don't want people to lose sight of
the same message within all of this. Oh,
look. I I'll admit first,
right on the surface of this, that I
am
be I'm more affected by what's happening right
now. I I too fall into these traps.
I'm human like anybody else. I get upset
by things that are said. I respond sometimes
irrationally. You know, in a number of things.
But I I feel like at least and
I'm quite frankly, I'm it it's not just
on Twitter. It's just in in the world.
You know, there are things that we react
to that you look back and go, well,
maybe I should've acted differently.
What I'm doing through all this converse I
guess the reason I'm saying that is because
it's easy to see that the the left
right paradigm,
the pettiness of it all of course, it
it will sometimes draw you in to things
that I might not otherwise be saying or
talking about. But often, my mindset is that
it's important to the bigger picture, highlighting why
you're being misled and so on. All of
that is just is said in the interest
of making sure we recognize that this is
all toward a positive outcome, at least what
I'm trying to accomplish.
I truly believe that we are fighting for
something positive
with people who want something positive who are
simply being misled
thinking that's what they're accomplishing.
So it really is a message just like
with the COVID 19 conversation. If you see
this stuff, you're not alone. You're not the
only one out there that is recognizing this
anomaly, this weirdness, how everyone wants to ignore
the fact that every person in power and
fighting for power all align with this other
dangerous thing that we don't wanna talk about.
It's important to see that we're fighting for
self determination like anybody else, to be free
from this kind of manipulation,
and to see that if we can fight
through that, we can see something positive.
And it's not only about attacking something or
demolishing
something or exposing something. It's about trying to
find our footing
as Americans, as the world, in a way
where we can actually feel positive about the
directions we're taking. And I think we need
to continue to kind of
resonate in that and not lose sight of
it because of all the petty
politics that are being shoved in your face
like that's the most important conversation. It's everywhere
on Twitter. And, again, my opinion is that
Elon is leading that whether he knows it
or not, driving you in a position. Same
with Donald Trump. Same with a lot of
them. Same with the left. It's not just
about left. It's not the point is that
my focus on the right today,
I think, is more obvious because the left,
I think, is I mean, for crying out
loud, we've got Biden who can't tie his
shoes, Kamala, who's the most hated person in
politics, but somehow that's supposed to be a
challenge to what's happening. I mean, you know
my opinion. This is they're we're being driven
to support this side of the conversation. It's
not left or right. It's your government. And
they're using that to keep you focused on
the fact that they you know, the idea
that they're fighting. I see the Trump side
of this and I see the way that
they're driving us into
the lowest common denominator.
It's about being powerful and about being right
and about not about what's positive and and
good in the world or in you know,
integrity
and compassion and empathy. Nope. Those things don't
matter because you're weak.
Now that's not every conservative, but if we
can see
the government perspective and all of that. Same
thing on the left. Right? It's about petty,
small objectives that you feel take from the
other side, and we're all being
driven to lean into that. Now I could
go off on this forever, but I that
whole thing right there is very important to
my overall point there, like I said before,
is that
I I believe what we're doing is in
the interest of positive change. I believe that.
So I I I guess I apologize if
things I've talked about in over over, you
know, so many months have led us to
feel like maybe that I'm black billed as
the term goes, and I'm not. I have
a lot of hope for people out there
that we can see this change. I see
it changing right in front of us as
I speak.
So I hope that's clear
that we can make a difference, and I
believe that you making choices in your immediate
life, just what you do today, the door
you open for somebody, who you speak to
that day, makes a difference. It reverberates through
the world. And I believe that we need
to do our best to push that out.
And me, myself included, to take my own
advice. Now let's start with the point about
leaked documents.
Now the overarching point between all of this
is that these are entities that are trying
to circumvent what we're doing in this country
along with other countries in the interest of
what they wanna accomplish. Not just Israelis or
Jews, but ultimately Zionists. But it really it
applies anybody. Any entity around the world is
trying to surreptitiously
use our politicians to achieve what they want
while telling us that it's all in our
interest. We should care about. I mean, that's,
like, a no brainer, isn't it? Now you
see a lot of the left and right
talk about Russia or China, and we should
care about those. But I argue that's about
trying to hide the bigger picture that all
the politicians pointing in those directions are very
well aware
is truly driving policy here. And that's obviously
Israel. There's no way around this. So today,
we're gonna talk about the leaked documents showing
this and why it shows you that we
can try to change this for a positive
direction if
we can acknowledge that this is not about
left or right.
Now this is from Li Fang and Jack
Paulson.
Looks like the first place this came from,
overlapping with Guardian, but I've seen a lot
of people posting this after the fact, which
is good to see it spread, but it's
good to give credit where it's due. Leaked
Israeli docs reveal effort to evade foreign agent
lobbying law. Now this is the FAR Act.
Now specifically, it says former general counsel of
the DNC
secretly advised the Israeli government
on how to avoid FARA registration of its
US propaganda
program.
That's very clear. Now I I would advise
that you don't lean in you know, really
that it's
not a partisan thing. Now obviously,
which is interesting by the way is in
2018, you would've easily seen this
leaning to the left.
Now we've seen it flip. And I I'm
really trying to hope people can see that
that this is, you know as I mean,
we saw during Trump's administration that people within
the Israeli conversation were calling Trump an anti
Semite. Now the right is their life raft
and what's going on. And really, it shows
you, as we'll get into APAC in general,
that it's funding all of your government for
this very reason. And then internally pitting itself
against each, each other, like us against us,
politicians against politicians for the interest of chaos,
destabilization,
distraction, as well as achieving what they want
through our policy.
So when it says DNC, this is just
the moment that that was where they felt
the most impact, I would argue. Right now,
we're watching the RNC direction. We're watching Trump
and Adelson and everything. So just I would
caution against making it a par a partisan
point.
Now it says the Israeli government sought legal
advice, and this is from a 2018 time
frame, on a US federal law requiring the
disclosure of foreign backed lobbying campaigns out of
concerns that mounting enforcement
of the law could ensnare
American groups
working in coordination with the Israeli government. Now
that alone is a problem.
This is leaked documents reviewed by The Guardian
suggests. Now the point is that the Israeli
government,
what we're gonna discuss, undeniably through ADL, APAC,
and a litany of other groups, are directly
influencing
outcomes.
That is the whole point of far. It's
a foreign agent. Now it doesn't have to
necessarily mean nefarious
and and and criminal.
That's usually the concern. But it really just
means that we care if a foreign entity
is influencing
policy.
Right? So that's what all it means is
they have to register as a foreign agent
and they can still engage. But there's we'll
go through and read for you why it
changes things. It changes the way that they're
able to do this. There's but they have
to give documents to the government at the
same time and, you know, we'll go through
it. What's interesting though
is that on another step removed, if the
Israeli government is working with
American groups, or let's just say set those
groups up
using
intermediaries
and then work through them. Now it's not
as easy to see, but let's be clear,
it's the same point.
So whether we're talking about AIPAC, for example,
which is a an Israeli group that's simply
set up in the United States, or, as
we'll go through, groups that they set up
through US intermediaries and then will prove to
you directly act in the interest of Israeli
government out out or in the interest of
Israel.
Either way, that is a direct violation. And
of course, as an American, you should care.
As always, if you are on the if
you're hearing this and you're like, well, I
don't know. It's an Israel ally? Take a
step back and just pretend it's China. Or
Russia, whatever outrages you more, and then realize
that it shouldn't matter what government we're talking
about. It's this it's the reason you're more
upset about one or the other is because
you've been conditioned to think that one is
more of a bad guy than the other.
It shouldn't matter.
Ultimately, foreign governments should not be able to
have access to influencing the outcome policy. That's
why that act exists.
Now, look, I'll happily point out that I
it we all can I mean, it matters
what group or government might have more of
a nefarious interest in manipulating you?
My point in saying all that is that
if you act like one doesn't matter and
the other one does more, I argue that's
more about being manipulated.
Emails and legal memos originating from a hack
of the Israeli justice ministry show that officials
feared
Israeli advocacy efforts in the US could trigger
the US law governing a foreign agent. Now
the point is that APAC,
not too long ago, shifted as we played
that clip from even MSNBC.
They shifted from kind of what general lobbying
is, as I've talked about in the past,
sort of, you know, giving funds to campaigns
in a long term interest that they ultimately
you know, because you arguably in support what
they genuinely
generally
have outlined as their objectives.
Not that you're funding
direct policy and then if they don't do
a certain thing, you yank that funding in
real time. Now even MSNBC
broke down the fact that APAC has shifted
and is the only one like it that
exists, where you have an a a for
a a group that is aimed at specifically
influencing for Israel
and aimed at all parties.
That's very that's really crazy to me. And
so what they're saying here is that they
were aware that these invasive actions could possibly
trigger
people anywhere going,
doesn't that seem like that's a problem? And
this is why they started lobbying people in
this country. So I just I wanna point
out, this is the most benign way right
there. It shows you that they're aware of
what they're doing. You could try to argue
that they're aware people might misinterpret it that
way, but either way, they knew that it
could be a problem, so they started taking
action to stop that.
Along the path, there is nothing but examples
like that. Of Israel trying to abuse the
US system for its benefit in ways that
use US politicians
and policy to effectively hide that they are
everything that we pretend we're pointing at at
other countries. And it says the documents show
that officials propose creating a new American nonprofit
in order to continue
Israel's activities in the US while avoiding scrutiny
under the law. So to be clear,
this is a document discussing Israel, not a
US group in the interest of Israel. Israel
discussing
creating
an American nonprofit.
That that should terrify people. If it was
China creating an American nonprofit to continue its
activities without scrutiny of the law, people would
lose their minds.
Hopefully, you're losing your mind about this because
it's the same point. It says a legal
strategy memo
dated July 2018
noted that compliance with the FARA Act or
Foreign Agents Registration Act would damage
the reputation
of several American groups or read
American in Israeli
American Israeli influenced American groups that receive funding
and direction from Israel.
Direction. Right there is the line that's crossed.
If these groups are being given direction from
a government outside of this country,
then that would be somewhere where you would
have to register. Whether or not you were
created in Israel or that you're run by
Israeli entities at the same point.
And they're saying
that that might damage our reputation
if you point out the facts.
Well, yeah. I would imagine it would. And
it says, and force them to meet onerous
transparency
requirements. God forbid, they should have to be
transparent about what they're doing. Like, I mean,
all of these things only sound like, if
you read this from a lens that they're
an ally and that this is insulting,
I guess that's the only way this could
make sense. But if you look at this
objectively with nonpartisan lens, it's a foreign government
trying to take actions to hide what it's
doing, objecting to transparency, and saying that if
you find out that we're working for Israel,
well, that could make us look bad. It's
like, yeah. I mean, you're making our case
for us. And this is a separate memo
noted that donors would not want to fund
groups registered under FARA.
Yes. Exactly. And the whole point is they
don't want you to know they're working on
behalf of foreign government because that might affect
their money and influence.
Uh-huh. And it says FARA requires people working
on behalf of a foreign government to register
as foreign agents with the US Justice Department.
In in listing reasons for avoiding FARA, the
memo again, this is about Israel back and
forth with US entities. The memo says that
the law compels registrants
to quote, flag any piece of propaganda.
Now, of course, that's in the sense of
not necessarily a negative thing, but that's just
a benign idea of trying to, you know,
set putting out information that influences what people
think.
I tend to think it always is a
negative connotation, but what they're saying is that
if you're dealing with a foreign government,
anything that they would be trying to float
out there about what they view things as
would have to be flagged.
And that it it it is distributed to
2 or more parties in the United States,
it has to be flagged with a disclaimer
stating that it was delivered by a foreign
agent, and then submit a copy of that
to the US justice department within 48 hours.
So think about it. If everything Israel had
to do was flagged with, well, this came
from a foreign government, and they'd have to
give copies to the US justice department, personally,
I argue the department is probably completely compromised.
But either way, it's making a very public
splashy trail of what they need to do
while calling themselves a foreign agent. I mean,
however you look at this, the reason that
destroys and other don't want it to happen
is because they're a foreign agent and because
this stops what they're trying to accomplish. And
it says, to prevent FARA registration
and the stigma and scrutiny associated with it,
the legal advisors,
people from the United States who are advising
a foreign government on how to circumvent this,
that sounds like a crime to me, suggested
channeling funds through a third party American nonprofit.
Now see, my there there's the name couple
of names are listed here. I don't know
why this is not a bigger story for
them. If I was a US lawyer and
I was being called out for or at
least identified
as a lawyer who was advising a foreign
hostile government, at least as I see it,
or just a foreign government, however you wanna
look at it. How to
circumvent and act a law
that would identify them as a foreign agent.
That sounds like a very serious crime to
me. Maybe treasonous, if you will.
But to prevent that,
they advise them to just, you know, funnel
money through a third car.
So a crime.
Right? What would you call that? Is that
is that
It's not money. What would you call that?
There's an I'm I'm blanking on a term
for it. You know, basically,
it's not tab Give me give me a
term give me the legal term for that
in the chat. I can't think of it.
You know, so you're you're a criminal, and
instead of,
you know, opening a bank account, you funnel
it through a 3rd party, so you hide
that money. There's a term for that. That's
what they got advised to do by American
lawyers. It's just wild. And it says, Liat
Glaser,
who was then a legal adviser to Israel's
Ministry of Strategic Affairs in 2,000
18, writes that even though the nonprofit
would not be formally managed from Israel,
formally,
quote, we will have means of supervision and
management. So here, even when they're trying to
go, hey. Let's start a third party.
Right? So we can channel that funds and
influence through this American, in huge quotes, 3rd
party,
they write in there, but we'll still have
management influence. Yeah. Obviously. How do you miss
that this again, these are leaked documents, but
the point is it shows you that their
only objective is to make sure, even if
they don't get credit or they hope they
don't get credit, that they can influence, supervise,
and manage
what this supposed American group is doing in
the United States. Now to be clear, this
is not a new idea. We've talked about
the Azov movement. Or rather, specifically, before it
was even called that, going back to Project
Aerodynamic and the US government, the CIA, and
Ukraine.
They took a lot a Nazi criminal and
gave him a company in the United States
called
Prologue. Prologue Inc.
There was one in the Ukraine. There was
one in the United States. He was a
literal Nazi war criminal they took from Poland.
And they gave him a media company in
the United States at in that time. You
how do you make sense of that with
the idea of fighting all of these things?
It's there's so much more behind the scenes
of all of this. So right now, we're
talking about the same thing. Israel setting up
basically shell companies in this country to influence
what we do. And where's that money go?
What does that influence?
Probably set up with money we give them.
Now it goes on to say, for example,
through grant making and, quote, informal condition
condition mechanisms, including oral meetings and updates.
It says the discussions around circumventing Farah focused
on a, quote, PR commando unit
formed by Israel's Ministry of Strategic
Affairs in 2017
to impose,
excuse me, improve Israel's image abroad.
Does it sound like a typical
military style force
brute force,
image, a a revival. I mean, improve your
image. It's a PR commando unit.
I mean, it sounds like brute force infiltration
of, like, your opinion.
Right? Sending PR commando units just to improve
Israel's image abroad. The group, a private public
partnership or public private partnership, it's exactly what
Whitney and I have talked about for a
long time. This is how they're hiding what
they're doing.
Was originally known as a group called Kehla
Shlomo.
So, again, a group
formed by Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs in
2017,
a public private partnership
known originally as Kele Shlomo, which translates to
Solomon's Sling,
before being rebranded as what they now call
concert a year later.
Interesting switch of the name, clearly meant to
fall into the background.
As well as Voices of Israel in 2022.
It says its initial mission was to undermine
the BDS movement targeting Israel boycotts, divestments, and
sanctions.
People in the United States protesting
in interest of Palestine.
You know, otherwise known as a foreign government
trying to undermine the constitutional rights of Americans
and having your government look the other way
or literally facilitate that.
That's what we're talking about.
Direct tie right here back to the government.
There are 1,000 of these. So if this
if you haven't caught on to why this
is so alarming yet, we're talking about a
foreign government
using PR commando units with the awareness of
the US government to circumvent your rights in
this country, to scare to scare you, to
shout you down, to possibly kill people. These
are not hypothetical things. That's what these groups
have been shown to do.
And we're talking about the idea of aimed
at influencing opinion of Americans
to influence American policy, foreign and domestic.
It says that over the course of its
history, the group has supported American nonprofits advocating
for anti BDS. So the question is how
many of these groups exist?
How many of these different companies are set
up to influence For Israel's policy, and are
we called American companies?
How long has this been happening?
And coordinated campaigns to push back against pro
Palestinian activities on US campuses.
We just saw that go crazy. All the
lies, all the complete, you know, assassination.
Personal,
I'd what's the term they use?
I can't I'm blanking on everything today. You
know, the the,
anti p or the assassination something campaigns. Like,
can't making you look bad.
I mean, that should bother everybody that that's
happening with the support of people like your
Brian Mast and others, really all of our
government, but the one that are really outspoken
about how they don't they don't care about
your constitutional rights if it hurts Israel.
Now since earlier this year, the Guardian exclusively
reported that voices of Israel was so again,
this is the one that was originally
Kele Shlomo, then concert, now Voices of Israel
in 2022.
But then again,
was rebooted shortly after what happened in off
of following the
after,
Hamas' invasion of the Israel proper and then
Israel's ongoing genocide. After that, they rebranded their
name yet again. Why? Because they knew this
would be another major push.
Now it's, Amchai,
Chikli,
the Lukud minister of Diaspora Affairs,
who oversees the latest iteration of the project,
informed the Knesset that the group was set
to go on the offensive
against
American students protesting the war. Like, doesn't that
send chills down your spine? Like, just again,
for those out there who might not be
able to see Israel as a problem. Think
about if that was China.
Literally saying that we have a group we
set up a decade ago. And we called
it pro China whatever. Then we changed it
to concert.
Then we changed it to voices of China.
Then we took a US military or rather
government entity, put him in charge of that
group, and literally publicly said that it was
on the offensive against American protesting against China.
Like, I I don't know. It's it's, like,
laughable how either side would lose their mind
and rightly so because that's crazy.
And would go in with there are huge
conversations from Fox News and all the way
around about how China's influence what we're doing
and they're threatening Americans. But God forbid we
highlight the same thing about Israel despite all
the things we've seen already.
Go on the offensive against you protesting what
you believe in.
And again, Amchai Chikli,
a Likud minister. So remember, we played this
game already just through this article where it's,
well, it's an American entity.
And not not this is the one they
set up to circumvent the FAR Act for
things like APAC.
And now it's being led by a member
of the Likud party. Because it's totally not
influenced by Israel or an Israeli entity. Right?
Like, the point is post October 7th, they
lost I mean, we can see.
The 1st week, I wrote about this saying
they've lost. It's over. Now that doesn't mean
they're stopping genocide, but we it's clear that
they've already lost. The cat is out of
the bag. It is over. People see what
they're doing.
So my point is the reason this went
crazy and they literally just put somebody right
in front because they they are desperate.
Post October 7th, they've lost control.
So it's just funny that the same thing
we've been saying, Vora, it's totally not, gets
led by a member of their own government.
And it says the heightened concern over the
FARA Act around 2018
was sparked in part by a series of
enforcement actions against the Trump administration
for unregistered lobbying for foreign interest. Now we've
already seen numerous examples, blanking on his name
off the top of my head.
Oh, I can see his face.
Bob Mendez, I think, with Egypt.
Right? I mean, it's it's not a unique
scenario
for members of governments to get paid by
foreign governments to
lean their way when it's necessary. Now what
the problem is is that we've got these
blinders on to Israel that does this with
literally everybody. But of course, when it's you
have this Egypt or, like, it it should
be a problem in any regard. Whether Egypt
or China or Russia or Israel or anybody.
But the point is that it's interesting to
see how this kind of thing gets disregarded.
Like, Russiagate,
as we showed even during Mueller's investigation,
clearly exposed that it was really it was
Realgate.
Their own investigation exposed that and they just
ignored it.
Why? If the whole point was about highlighting
Trump doing that, well, why would they go,
well, guess what? We found Israel. He's influenced
by Israel. But they all ignored that. Just
like this would be disregarded because, oh, the
left's going after Trump. Well, probably. But that's
not what this is. We're talking about very
clear examples of all of our government, not
just Trump, not just Biden,
working in the interest and being
funded in some ways by foreign entities. I
mean, for crying out loud, just because it's
Miriam Adelson, let's not pretend like it's not
obviously extension of Israel. A $100,000,000.
And he agreed to allow them to go
forward with their openly,
shockingly, obviously illegal settlements.
Now it says the July 20 2018 Israel
legal memo
noted that, quote, in the past, Farrow was
applied
to countries hostile to the United States, such
as Russia, Pakistan.
That's what it says there. Then this is
Glaser, who is the person we're talking about
here. Hold on. I think I skipped his
name up here.
Liat Glazer.
I did talk about him. So the adviser
he's the one that was the adviser to
Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs.
He warned
that the new atmosphere of enforcement,
given the ties between Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump,
could lead to a formal investigation by the
state the US Department of Justice.
So all they're really saying is that there
was somebody and, again, I've never argued that
there were clear part like, someone like a
Pelosi, for example, or Maxine Waters. I don't
think they know anything.
Like a Lindsey Graham, for example. These people,
I don't really believe that they are truly
aware of what's go I think they're just
being used pawns in this larger game. My
point in saying that is that I think
they genuinely have very petty hatred for each
other. So that very clearly could lead to
certain action. In this case, we're talking about
the idea but my point is if it
ended up butting up against the reality of
what Israel's doing, somebody there would stop that
from being shown. Either way, we saw this
point
that how obvious it was that Netanyahu was
influencing what Trump was doing, and it's not
unique to Trump. Again, it's left and right.
It's your government. That that drew people making
a bigger point, but then it got kind
of derailed into Russiagate. That which is exactly
my point.
And here's the document, by the way.
It's in it's in Hebrew, but you can
save it, read through it yourself.
And it says in response or actually, here
we go. It says it also notes potential
downsides
of creating
such an American intermediary.
Like a group that they create as a
third party to kinda fill the role and
pretend like they're not the ones doing it.
It says both weaker Israeli government control
over any such group. That's what they're stating.
And a mechanism that could be interrupted for
what it was.
Interpreted, excuse me, for what it was. An
attempt to sidestep far. So they're expressing concern
that, well, this might actually
lessen our influence over the thing, which is
exactly why this should matter to people, but
this wasn't supposed to be seen, you understand?
Or the fact that it might be seen
as them side stepping far, which is exactly
what it is. The documents reference concerns on
the part of US groups over triggering far
enforcement,
concerns that officials say hindered their ability to
conduct advocacy for the United States.
So all they're really saying is, you know,
we stopped us for advocating for US. It
it's not really the it's ultimately
them controlling
US policy.
And it says to be to avoid the
potential public relations fallout, Glaser urged secrecy surrounding
the Israeli government's hiring of Sandler Reef.
The American law firm engaged to study the
issue.
Quote, exposing the name of the law firm
could thwart the entire relationship,
She cautioned, too late now, and quote, I
was
as I understand it, was agreed with them
that the engagement will with Israel would not
be revealed.
Now why would that be?
What's so secret? I mean, if your argument
is you're not breaking the law, and you're
doing everything on the up and up and
it's just a misinterpretation,
why wouldn't you then just go, well, yes.
Of course, I'll help you. Of course, we'll
work with you to make sure that you're
not no. They wanted to hide the relationship
with the law firm trying to lie to
you is the way I would read that.
But you can decide for yourself. And yet
again, case it may for those that might
just be tuning in, we're we're talking specifically
about
political infiltration.
Zionism
infiltrating
the policy of the United States. Or specifically,
the Israeli government, but I see that being
the Zionist influence.
So I'm gonna make a point about what
happened to Whitney yesterday in the UK Times,
and how it's just so desperate to try
to make everything about racism.
Certainly does overlap in some cases, but the
reality being is we're talking about them controlling
this. They just can't all they only are
able to hear one thing in that. Even
Even though we can explicitly describe and explain
how that's not what we think. I'm a
it's embarrassing to watch what the UK Times
just did with her. We'll show you in
a second. How clearly she made a very
very very clear point about the
provable Jewish mafia that existed at the time
and it was only part of the mafia
she pointed out. And made a clear point
that there was only 1. And then they
they literally framed her as claiming Jews are
on the world.
Like, just that's how reductive it is now
by I mean, how embarrassing for them. But
I don't think they care. Same with everything
else, I think that we're watching these strains
get pulled to the point of them being
snapped. Like, that's how brazen and lazy this
is because they're desperate. I'm talking about the
Zionism trying to influence policy as well as
your perception. It's what we're all of this
is about right now.
Then it goes on to say, Brigadier General
Seema Vaknin Gill,
who was a former intelligence officer and former
chief military censor
for the Israeli Defense Forces,
who was intimately involved with the creation
of the original Kele Kele Schlomo, later called
voices of Israel, later called, what was it?
I already forgot what the last one was.
Anyway, the point is an Israeli entity
set up under the guise of being totally
not an Israeli entity. And and in the
beginning point was run by a person involved
in the US gov or the other Israeli
government. Then in 2022,
run by a literal public member of the
Knesset.
And it's the point they're making is this
was originally set up
by another for a former intelligent entity of
Israel.
Like, it's amazing how this US entity seems
to be run and organized and set up
and and driven
by former and current Israeli entities.
Funny how that works. Totally an American entity.
And it says who copied on many of
the emails and named in the key documents
concerned how to avoid Bara. So they were
continually tagging this person as they were talking
about trying to avoid being called out for
what they are.
Vaklan,
Vaknan Gill is now currently a board member
of the Kansas based nonprofit,
of course,
Combat Antisemitism
Movement.
So what this needs to so again, there's
a point right there that needs to be
made. So the main point is about APAC
and other Israeli entities doing desperate things to
try to avoid being seen for what they
are. A foreign government entity influencing
US policy.
So realizing that this Vactin Gill, a former
intelligence IDF member,
who set up a previous company that we
already just proved to you is directly it
is Israel,
trying to reimagine a shell game than what
they're doing.
But separately from that, this guy jumped off,
started up a totally separate, unconnected American entity,
Kansas based,
that's based around combating antisemitism.
So how many companies like this are set
up in this country by people who are
clearly acting in the interest of a foreign
government?
Now we'll get to a point that Thomas
Massie made just recently about dual citizenship.
And of course, there's all these people that
are in other categories seem to be very
good at what they do who cannot wrap
their mind around how it's not a secret,
it's not a conspiracy theory. And it's an
open conversation that you're not allowed to discuss
because you get called racist like we're gonna
show you in a second. About literally anybody
from any government
becoming in this country and having dual citizenship
and have being in positions of power.
Simple. Period. End of story. The fact that
there's so many from Israel should concern you,
but the point is about how any government
and the influence and the point becomes if
it comes down to a point where it
doesn't have to be that they're acting nefariously
all the time. I think that's more the
point. Let's just say they act with good
intentions.
There will come a choice where they have
to decide
what side to lean into
of something that seems to better better one
side or the other, and the choice has
to be made. If you're in a position
of power, what choice will you make? Will
it be in the interest of this citizenship
or that citizenship? It's a very basic question.
It's not racist.
The point here is that when we see
these kind of things and you've got people
that are acting in this country as Americans
who came from an Israeli intelligence or military
background, unit a200 or otherwise, even started previous
companies that we can prove are direct extensions
of Israel, who break off and make a
Kansas based company
as an American.
Well, certainly could just be a coincidence. But
I think it's obvious that you can see
the overlap here.
And the point that we're getting to is
that this person is clearly part of this.
So here's one example of a supposed Kansas
based nonprofit,
totally not Israel connected, about fighting antisemitism for
Americans that is actually a complete extension of
the Israeli agenda.
The otherwise known as CAM, Combat Antisemitism Movement,
was set up 1 year after the Ministry
of Strategic Affairs,
where Bakhtin Gill was director general,
proposed a strategy to mitigate Farah,
the risk of it, by setting up an
American nonprofit funded by Concert.
The point being is that this person is
in in intricately come in tied in with
the circumvention of what they really were and
tied in with the other companies that were
undeniably Israeli.
CAM has publicly disclosed
that it is a partner of both Concert
a excuse me, and
Israel's Ministry of Diaspora Affairs. So right there,
you have a group set up as a
can a Kansas based nonprofit
where the person
running this, or rather the company itself, has
disclosed as a partner of Concert, which remember
was originally,
was it, Cal Shlomo or whatever?
An Israeli entity.
As well as just stats blatantly
Israel's Ministry of Diaspora Affairs.
So, yes, you could argue, but it's an
American company that's reached out and made connections
with Israel, or you could start being honest
with yourself about how obvious this is. But
the organization has, quote, refused or isn't a
quote, but just refused
requests
from journalists
to disclose its funders.
Sounds like a total on the up and
up American company that's trying to desperately avoid
foreign registration and clearly works with Israel. Doesn't
wanna let you know what they do and
who funds them. Right? Nothing weird there.
When reached for comment, Cam stated that it,
quote, was not established by nor is it
influenced by the Israeli government.
Think about saying that with what we just
read.
And emphasize that CAM is a global interfaith
coalition that unites over 850 partner organizations. Yeah.
That's terrifying.
Quote, if there was a deliberate effort by
Israeli governmental officials to influence American policy and
or public opinion on foreign affairs, noted Craig
Holman, a lobbying expert with Public Citizen,
quote,
this would constitute a FARA violation,
not just by the US agents serving the
Israeli government, but also by any person
or nonprofit
organization
in the US who is knowing
is a knowing participant. So we basically just
said what I said before. These are all
violations,
no matter how you spin this. The only
reason it's not is because the FARA Act,
more than anything I can see,
very selectively applied.
Glaser, the author of one of the FARA
memos who helped organize several meetings around the
issue, left the government in 2021
and joined Google, of course,
as one of the company's lobbyists in Israel.
So the guy that's literally trying to sell
you on the other side of it left
his com government, worked as for Google as
an in Israeli lobbyist.
It's just
but you're but you're a liar and racist
person if you think there's any connection to
Israel. Glaser did not respond for request for
comment through Google, of course. The documents
showed that Cal Shlomo or concert or voice
of America or voice of Israel or at
least connected to
so Cal Shlomo
grants to the documents show that they granted
how does that read, the documents showed Cal
Shlomo grants to several American advocacy
groups, including Christian Zionist organizations,
such as Christians United for Israel and the
Israel All Allies Foundation.
See, that doesn't that doesn't seem like it
reads right. The document showed
Cal Shlomo grants to several American advocacy groups,
so just grants to them. So I guess
maybe it gives them money. Either way, the
point is it shows you direct connections with
other Zionist groups, Christian included. Don't forget, there
are more Christian Zionists today than there are
Jewish Zionists,
which is the whole point of when you
say that we're talking about Zionists and they
make it about Jewish people, you can clearly
prove that they're
misrepresenting what you think. And it says in
2018,
oh, and then it says
the latter so they're they've granted all the
money to these other Israel and Zionist groups.
Then it says the latter, Israel Allies Foundation,
was involved in helping to pass anti BDS
state laws, which are unconstitutional
at their core. No matter what you say
about it, it is unconstitutional
to to admit to
make it a law to say you're not
allowed to boycott x, y, and z. Period.
And it says that they may they helped
pass these laws making that the case, penalizing
Americans from engaging in certain forms of boycotting
targeting specifically the Israeli government. In 2018,
Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs also approved a
$445,000
grant to the Institute For the Study of
Global Antisemitism and Policy or ISGAP,
which totaled about 80%
of the organization's reported annual budget.
I mean, it's just like the the ar
and oh, let me finish this point. You
this then I'll make this point because it's
important. The nonprofit initially disputed
the precise amount,
but then conceded
Israeli government support
when reached by The Forward, which The Forward
is the outlet, the platform.
FARA includes an exemption for academic projects
that do not entail political activity,
political activity. So the point is, if we're
talking about a a half a $1,000,000 grant
to a group that is studying anti Semitism
that comes directly from the Israeli government,
they claim is they will as academic, so
we don't have to register for that.
But here's how this works. If they're funding
academic
papers, academic
in direction,
and then those academic statements, direction, or per
perceptions are then used to flavor
people coming through their schools, people going through
their think tanks, and then that creates policy
or creates,
you know,
papers, study scientific studies or whatever else that
then clearly are used to drive I mean,
you can see how this works. So whether
it's a loophole or not, if that was
the only thing happening, you could argue it
was just about research. But then you've got
the companies they're setting up, you've got the
direct obvious influence, you've got the lobbying groups,
and you've got the academic influence. It's obvious
what's happening. Now it says last year,
vac vac Vaknan Gill, the Israeli intelligence officer,
involved in the formation of Keller Shlomo and
or concert, and the discussions about avoiding foreign
registration joined
that very group
as its managing director. So he you can
see how this comes back around. So just
because you wanna say there's some kind of
a loophole for academic stuff, the point is
you can prove did I just go too
far? Where was it? Here we go. That
this academic group, the Institute For the Study
of Global Antisemitism,
not only got money directly from the Israeli
government, you now have an Israeli intelligence officer
working as its managing director.
Like, if you're not alarmed with how these
pieces are being set up, I mean, it
it just it yeah. I don't think anything
will alarm you. I mean, you probably be
okay with an Israeli
government member becoming president of this country. Like,
it just it's so clear the infiltration that's
happening. And it should matter it should matter
no matter what government or what
religion they claim they are. It's obvious why
this is concerning.
Now it says the ISGAP,
the group we just discussed, the institute,
has expanded its advocacy role in recent months.
Surprise, surprise. The group took credit
for influencing the contentious
December 2023 congressional congressional hearing
with elite college presidents,
which preside which preceded Harvard University president,
her reg resignation. So right there is the
point. Just because you pretend it's academic, that
was they marshaled this academic group to literally
drive congressional
outcomes.
I mean, it's just ridiculous. And on top
of that and look, I've made it clear,
I don't support the vast majority of what
these college liberal entities do.
But if you think for one second that
means that you can ignore how obvious Israel
pushed lies to get these people pushed out
of their positions, whether or not you think
they should be there.
Those 2 things can exist at the same
time. You can argue that they're bad educators
for pushing woke policies,
but also recognize that they were attacked based
on lies,
blatant and provable lies about what they were
allowing to happen. Now that the whole thing
has come around during those Palestinian protests, they
were the ones claiming that they were allowing
racism. That's what that was all based on.
Stefanik, with her hand shaking as she lied
directly to these people and got called out
for as this went forward, but still some
of them resigned. Whether you think it's good
or not, it was based on a lie
for this. The point is that was driven
predominantly by the group that Israel's government funds
and a
former or rather Israeli intelligence officer is leading
as a managing director.
Those strings are undeniable.
And it says that they, in recent months,
they've met with congressional leaders
regularly
as the group has urged investigations
of these pro Palestinian protests. So you see
the academic loophole is a complete mirage.
Now it says in another email about the
issue sent about the issue sent in December
2019,
Glaser emphasized the need to find a solution
that would alleviate
far related concerns on the part of American
groups. Or read, Israel Israel groups in the
United States and we have to find a
way to get around this, which is what
all of this is about.
Well done here. Now I'm gonna include
both this document
as well as the conversation we had with
Corey Hughes
in July on July 1st 2024.
I mean, this is a very public talking
point, but I hope it's important that you
see it in the bigger context. And make
sure you watch this because it's a great
interview about and the question is, was Israel
behind the assassination assassination of JFK?
I I think it's obvious.
But the point is you can decide for
yourself and it's obvious that you can see
that he was just about to make Israel
register under the FARA act, as well as
the fact that they were going after exposing
the Dimona nuclear plant in Israel. Because Israel
has always and based on stealing US technology,
has been making nuclear weapons.
As you can decide if you could I
mean, it could be the CIA. It could
be a number of things. But the point
is that was a huge part of this
conversation. He was going to make them register
under the FAR. A APAC, specifically.
Now, this is also the on the original
post talking about this. Leaked documents reveal Israel's
strategy to avoid US foreign lobbying lobbying law.
This is from the day after. That's why
I went with their their sub sect first.
The point though is this is very public,
very real. There's no denying this. Now this
is going to be ignored by the very
people who are benefiting from it, you know,
your government.
But it's important that we highlight this, that
we push for this and, you know, drive
the thing I always talk about. Whether it's
based or rooted in genuine desire for change
or opportunism,
the point is there will be a politician
that will have enough push and power and
clout to go, we should push this out.
We should call this out. Or, you know
and look. I don't know what you think
about Thomas Massie. I'd like to believe that
he is one of the only honest people
out there, but I have a really hard
time believing that's even possible. I know I'm
jaded when it comes to politics, but I'm
willing to hope for that. I'll I I
I will keep I will
not dismiss the possibility. My point in saying
that is he's one that does seem to
be standing up, saying dual citizens are a
problem, saying
we have to talk about these things. My
point in saying that is whether you think
it's just him recognizing an opportunity to gain
following, which I don't think he needs, or
it's just him deciding to be honest, it's
for you to decide.
My point is more people will will come
in line. More politicians will go, wow, look
at all the support he's gotten there. And
it's usually politicians that might have a a
momentum going but aren't the leading one that
use that to jump ahead. And if we,
as people watching the process, lean into that
I don't even necessarily mean voting. I just
mean your support online, rising them to the
top of the conversation so their voice makes
more
impact.
We are already doing that and we can
change the con like, look at Jill Stein,
for example. I'd like to believe that she
genuinely is wanting to make positive change, but
I just I'm look. I've seen the way
she's acting in past elections. I just don't
know how we could possibly believe that. But
she does seem to be continually ringing that
bell and calling out Zionism and Israel and
all of it. So good. I'll lean into
that. But I just don't believe and I
don't think you're vote I mean, you know
my points about the election. But this is
important to say. That it is being reported
around the world and it's very obvious.
Now, all of this, before we go on
to the next point here, is is to
make sure we're not missing
how important it is to recognize that they
are on the record influencing policy through APAC,
through academic
funding, through setting up shell companies as Whitney's
talked about for a very long time. The
or, you know, the Silicon Valley tech startups.
I mean, this is a long term and
it's it's written down. It's a direct you
could see the policy of how this is
supposed to affect the world's
the tech sphere or specifically policy in foreign
countries to interest Israel. They barely hide it.
So it needs to be seen,
especially coming into this election, and why that's
so concerning. It's the thing that I'm talking
about that we need to officially,
you know,
change. We need to highlight this so we
don't continue to go through this hamster wheel.
Now the point of all this is it's
not just in one direction.
Right? For j here's Netanyahu.
It's in Hebrew, but he's basically,
submitted 40. I'll I can just read what
it says here.
Israel's preparing for any threat.
Defensively and offensively,
except that no matter what, they call it
defense, just so that's clear. We are determined
to defend ourselves and exact a very high
price from any enemy who dares to attack
us,
From any
arena whatsoever.
My point in showing that
is this is what's happening.
Let's if he decides that you, American protester,
are his enemy,
he'll go after you.
And this is not my opinion. They have
made this clear. They've said this in the
Knesset
countless times, or I think at least twice
that I can prove, but I've seen it
many times, that they can legislate anywhere in
the world.
It's not a conspiracy theory. They've publicly made
this point that we are not bound by
international law.
Your government just doesn't wanna make this clear,
but they've said it publicly, and so they
very clearly think that if you're a problem
they can do what they when they literally
just assassinated people in Tehran
without any concern, they literally assassinated people in
Lebanon,
We've seen them steal and take surreptitious actions,
spy internally in the White House, in the
United States. Classic examples over the years. I'll
show you a clip at the end of
this segment about USS Liberty. But the idea
that they don't care about these lines and
your government has only facilitated that
for a long time now.
So remembering about APAC,
the point that I recently showed you. So
whether we're talking about other shell companies set
up or the direct lobbying, I just wanted
to make sure this point was clear. So
under the Wikipedia page, which I get the
ceiling might change soon, American Zionist Council.
I just have it highlighted here from before.
The American Zionist Council was an Israeli lobby
group founded in 1949.
Right? So it's an Israeli group.
That's undeniable.
Not this, like, this game they play where
it's an American group of Jews that just
advocate for Israel in general, but are an
American fighting for American outcome. That's not what
APAC is.
An Israeli lobbying group founded in 1949, which
what does the American Zionist Council. It was
founded as a tax exempt umbrella organization of
American Jewish groups,
which found which focused on Israel and included
a Zionist Organization of America. It's Washington representative,
l, Isaiah Keenan.
Keenan organized and the incorporated Zion American Zionist
Committee For Public Affairs, AZCPA, in 1951.
Now following its independence,
AZCPA began involving American Jewish organizations
not formally committed to Zionism, in order to
increase its credibility,
and separate separate itself
from AZC's role
as a middleman
for the Israeli government.
The exact opposite of what they say that
APAC is. And then it says, AZCPA
was then renamed
to APAC in 1959.
So, to avoid being seen as the middleman
for the Israeli government.
Now, for people who are paying attention,
is that even disputed? Well, yes, it really
is. There are people out there that are
genuinely arguing APAC is an American entity that
is not influenced by Israel. That's what we
just went over.
They're desperately trying to keep it from being
registered and taking action to sidestep it because
it's obvious that's what they are.
It just couldn't be more clear. Here's APAC
publicly saying, look. 97% of the ones we
backed have won.
All left and right and whatever else because
it's not about trying to initiate policy that
they actually believe in. It's about control.
And yet we just people just don't wanna
see it. And realize, I think it was
in this clip I'll show you. Maybe we
are right here. I'm not gonna play this
again because since 5 minutes, but I played
it many times.
They've they've I think it's something like 74%
of all politicians have have get are just
taking money from APAC. I bet you the
rest are taking money from other groups, like,
related to Israel, if you want my honest
opinion. But this clip is very
even on MSNBC which doesn't mean I trust
MSNBC. It's just I think it's opportunism. But
however you look at it, he's breaking down
for you the fact that APAC has shifted
like we just discussed into a very very
aggressive role that we've never seen before. And
he's going over how it's one of the
only packs that are directed at all sides.
Not left or right, but everybody.
And that they are explicitly
acting in ways that would should be registered
under FARA.
And just nobody seems to care about it.
You can watch the clip for yourself. And
here's APAC saying, being pro Israel is good
for policy and good politics. They're proud to
have helped a 111 Democrats to win their
the cycle so far. Every APAC endorsed Democrat
has advanced their here, I love this. It's
so funny to me because I think it's
next. Yeah. Right here. In this very many
clips, by the way,
Donald Trump, as I said here, very explicitly,
and I'll play one of them for you,
says that Israel should control congress and he's
gonna make sure that comes back into being
the case. And he also says very clearly
that if that was the case, that these
people would have never got elected. I mean,
it's like you just don't wanna hear how
obvious that is, those dismissing this. He just
said explicitly that it wasn't about you voting.
It's whether AIPAC wants them in power.
And you're supposed to be okay with that?
Because he's pointing at Democrats that you've decided
are bad people? I mean, my god. That's
really, really shortsighted.
But the point here
is Donald Trump says that they're all radicals.
Right? He, in multiple ways, not just the
extreme parts, just generally discusses the left as
the problem, which they all do right now.
It's very binary left. Very
very reductive.
Left and right. It's all about the boogeyman
of the other side. The point
is that if they're all the the ones
that are rabid anti Semites and all the
democrats supporting all of the bad guys, and
that's what he was saying in front of
a Zionist Israeli crowd all cheering him on,
and then make sense of that by showing
how APAC
funds those same people.
So is APAC, or Israel, is funding the
ones that he just said are completely anti
Israel? Anybody wanna make sense of that? Because
that's not really the case.
Very few of them are act actually,
when it comes to policy, anti Israel. Even,
like, people like AOC and the rest have
voted in line with the rest or just
didn't vote or, you know, voted present
at times when it really came down to
matter. But they'll speak a big game.
It's all about what happens. The outcome is
what truly matters.
Now in the I'll play just this one
clip for you. I'm I'm I'm still blown
away by this.
Both this and the next one we'll get
to. How people the the if you wanna
get lost and admire of stupidity, just look
through these comments. And, of course, as I
joked about it, I forgot to put hashtag
2 party illusion. So I spent half the
day regard engaging with people that would go,
oh, so you vote for Kamala, you moron.
It's like, the only way they can make
sense of this is just to
bend it into some partisan lens.
No. No. They're all ridiculous. Both parties and
people that blindly follow either are all ridiculous,
in my opinion. But I'm still fighting to
expose the truth to those people. I'm still
trying to get them to see the reality.
I'm still fighting for their rights.
But people watch this. Every one of these
clips expla I said, here are clips from
Trump's recent campaign trail event. Trump openly states
that Israel used to control the US Congress,
and he says that it will again when
he's president. He also makes it clear that
your constitutional rights will not be honored if
you criticize Israel.
Each one of these clips explicitly state that.
For some reason, people kept responding going, it
doesn't say that. And then one of them,
I responded by posting this one, which has
two examples that are verbatim.
And they just, oh, I'm sorry. I'm glad
you posted that. I didn't know it was
true. That was in the one you said
it wasn't in. So I don't know if
they're just blindly listening to one of them
or just I don't know. But in case
you wanna hear it again, here are two
examples of Trump explicitly stating what I just
said. And why that doesn't alarm I mean,
the let's put it this way. The only
reason that wouldn't alarm a republican is if
they're completely okay with that. Or alarm anybody
for that matter, left or right, is it's
because they're okay with that.
No. The biggest change I've seen in congress
is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that 10 years
ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And to I think you know exactly
what I what I'm saying.
They had such power Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
Rightfully
over congress.
You know,
Israel was the most powerful
lobby
in the country 15 years ago.
Today, between Tlaib and AOC and all of
these people, what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the backing that they once
had. You'll give it to them. Yeah. I
have the I'm good.
I'm
and if you listen to what on this
one, on the line of his plate, it's
explicit
that they had that power, they will again,
rightly so.
Or rather the will again is more explicit
than the other one too, but rightly so.
They expresses the idea that they should have
control over congress. And And then at the
end, he kinda rattle about the answer. But
in the other two clips, he makes it
very clear that they wouldn't have been elected
and that and that we will make sure
that's the case. I just wanna make sure
we're not missing how obvious that is, how
alarming it is that we're in a position
where a what I see as the
undeniable
selection
for the next president
openly telling you that that's the reality that
we should be okay with.
Here's Mary Madison openly just outlining how Donald
Trump did all the things he was paid
to do for them, all of which were
illegal. But the point is, people blindly supporting
it are convinced that doesn't matter or just
don't care.
Now here's what really worries me.
This is actually something I at first I
wasn't sure if this was him just kinda
trolling or whatever, but it is very real.
This was posted on some back and forth,
quote, I'm willing to serve Elon Musk accepts
Donald Trump's big cabinet role offer.
Now whether Trump actually does it or not
is up for debate. It's simply saying, here's
what he says. Former president Donald Trump on
Monday said he would consider appointing Tesla, CEO
Tesla CEO
Elon Musk to his cabinet.
If he wins, he says, quote, he's a
very smart guy, which I mean, honestly, is
debatable. There's a lot of over off a
lot of discussion about why this is more
of a grift, the way he presents himself,
a lot of money behind what his actions
are. But, you know, he there's plenty of
things I've seen him say that seem to
make him seem intelligent. But he says, I
would certainly
certainly would if we do it. He's a
brilliant guy.
So one of his typical non answers, right,
asked, he said, he's a very smart guy.
I certainly would
if he would do it. He's a brilliant
guy. So it kind of say yes if
he says yes. If it you know, it's
it's the way Trump likes to answer. But
you it may mean yes. It may mean
that we want you to think that for
now for political reasons and propaganda.
In any case,
I it really I mean, I honestly think
it's probably what's gonna happen. Tell you what
the RFK conversation, if you haven't seen that.
That's been circulating the last couple of days.
RFK campaign, quote, looking at joining forces with
Trump,
which, of course, that's what was been discussed
as of yesterday, today. That all she said
in this clip, which I think is in
here,
or it's right here, this clip
of her this is her his VP speaking
about how well we could
keep pushing, look aim for 5% to get
the money and make a new party, or
we could join forces with Trump. Maybe we
should do that. That's where it comes from.
And the point is that most of them
are saying, well, they're looking at doing so.
As far as I could tell, I don't
see anything definitive. But as the typical
Alex was right game,
breaking update, RFK junior set to join the
campaign,
is the way that gets reported. Very the
people's voice of you, Alex, to just completely
misrepresent what's actually happening. This is how the
whole Alex right meme works. You know, if
it doesn't happen, well, you know, if they
thought so, but it happens. Oh, he was
right. He knew it inside secret sources. It's
just a hedging your bet kind of a
game.
Lot of it happens like that. But the
point is,
I believe
this is where it's going. And as I
said, if both RFK and Elon end up
in Trump's administration,
I will be convinced
that that was always the plan.
Either way, we're pretty screwed with what it
will recreate
when the 3 most worshiped political figures today,
think about it, merge their sycophan followers into
one obsessive hero worshiping blob.
I mean, look, I'm not trying to hate
on anybody that wants to believe that I
mean, look, if I want you if I
hope you guys are right, as always.
The way you see these people, my god.
If we could actually achieve that, and they
would actually be the people you want them
to be from an honest lens, not be
them for you and hate everyone on the
left, but like a genuine leader that would
make positive change. Well, guy, of course, we
should want that. I just think it's shockingly
naive that that's even I mean, look at
what they're doing. Look at who they are.
The game is through a partisan lens. But
imagine,
these 3 gigantic
ideologues
blur merge everything together. I mean, how in
the world do you think we'll ever be
able to fight that?
That's terrifying to me. That's cult level.
I it's just I mean, I don't even
it it really does worry me where that's
ultimately goes. And if we see them merge
together, I mean,
this might very well be the entire point
of all this.
Now we just talked about this on the
the low point we're starting with and why
that matters. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, RFK Junior
are all blindly
pro Israel.
Now I know there are conservatives out there
that that wanna believe in Donald Trump, but
are not blinded enough to see to ignore
what's going on.
That you see the children being murdered as
we're talking. You see the starvation. You see
the ethnic cleansing ongoing. You see the blind
ignorance around what we see of genocide happening
in front of us every single day. The
actions of what Israel has been doing. The
infiltration of foreign governments. The manipulation of policy.
The many, many, many atrocities, the many genocides
before this that they've been involved with, Rwanda,
Bosnia,
the involvement with South Africa, apartheid.
I mean, I know you see it.
So my point is if you can see
how serious that is, we have to try
to reach other people, at least call out
the ones that you know are blindly ignoring
it. So if we have those 3, as
well as Kamala and Biden, who all are
all across the board pro pro Israel, doesn't
that show you something?
This last show we just went over, how
Israel uses the 2 party illusion, like I
just described, to divide, destabilize,
and control US policy.
And on top of that, we just played
the clip many many times around about
bbnet and
Yahoo. Openly saying that, yeah, we don't worry
about them. We can control the US.
They're easy to manipulate. Paraphrasing.
It's a home record.
So my point is don't let these ID
logs at the top blind you into thinking
you're supposed to be ignoring these things for
high fiving your TeamSport politics.
They are guiding you into your demise.
And this game of saying,
like, that somehow is in the interest of
Kamal. Did you not hear me reference the
first two? All of them. All of them
across the board are in the interest of
Israel.
So if you're taking my arguments as don't
vote for Donald Trump, you're not listening.
It's not about that. And I've gotten into
my discussion, of course, the argument of, well,
what should we do instead? Well, that's for
you to decide. You're a grown up. But
if you can acknowledge how clear this is
not what you think it is and then
just go through the motions anyway, then I
don't think you care about change.
I I I'm not saying I have all
the solutions, but I if we can all
see the problem and yet then just pretend
like the problem's not there until we have
a solution, I don't think you want change.
This die this binary back and forth is
is it's exhausting.
As we just showed the other day, Wall
Street silver.
Making some overlapping reference to what something Kamala
said
and saying, I knew that sounded familiar,
claiming it comes from some Nazi thing, which
maybe does. But my point is just how
exhausting this is. And I use that same
Spider Man meme of pointing at each other.
And I said, this partisan dance just gets
so tiresome. And I put Nazi symbols over
both their heads. Like the the idiocy
of both sides calling each other nazis,
with with neither side having any real basis
to do so other than the fact that
they're competing for Israel's support. I mean, or
rather just I I don't know how else
to frame that. It's
shockingly obvious. And and if you're actually leaning
into the just blind allegation because you want
that other side to lose, again, you're in
this for reasons that have nothing to do
with what you pretend you're fighting for.
Caitlin just put this out. Politicians in dystopia
land warn another candidate will cause dystopia.
It's a great breakdown. Now I'm in no
way argue we should be voting for 1
versus the other. I think that should be
clear by now. But it's amazing that we
can't see how that's what they're both projecting.
It's like saying what we already
highlighted. We're gonna have to break democracy to
save democracy. And they're literally both presenting forms
of that argument right now. So if we
I mean, we're being engineered right now. If
we can't see how that's leading us to
a guaranteed position of destabilization,
probably by design for what they're trying to
accomplish, again, I don't know what else to
show you.
Amir Mate says the same thing. In running
against the other party, democrats fearmonger about being
rounded up in fascist prisons and republicans fearmonger
about being placed in communist gulags.
And meanwhile, both parties join hands in to
cage 2,000,000 Palestinians in an actual death camp.
Now I get how this can drive people
to feel out I mean, whether it's cognitive
dissonance or something else, to feel out of
sorts.
That you don't have a a clear direction.
Might but, there are paths that we can
take.
I just don't wanna start plugging in political
solutions because that will easily drive people away
from recognizing the problem first. But there are
plenty of direction that we could take post
this. But until we can realize that the
government
the US government,
whoever's influencing it, is not acting in your
interest as Americans, I don't see how we're
gonna begin solving this problem.
And and the best way to not solve
it is to double down. To lean into
one side or the other which maintains the
hamster wheel and the same things we've always
been doing. I mean, if we can't look
back over the last 50 years and recognize
that nothing has changed, not really, not things
other than political wedge issues oscillating back and
forth, there's nothing of substance.
We've only continued to fall into the same
traps, further away from constitutional rights or them
honoring them.
So the first step is to make sure
we recognize that it's our government that's ignoring
us for something else.
And then first, recognize or secondarily, I guess,
that we as a collective are the ones
that should be deciding this future. Now whether
we wanna go in a direction of some
kind of other referendum around like, the idea
of of high highlighting our our right as
a constant as as Americans
to alter or abolish our government as we
see fit. Not through the congress, but how
however you wanna do this. My point is
that we can have an entire
7 hour conversation about the different directions we
could take, politically or otherwise.
My point over all of it is that
the people screaming at the top about voting
right or left in this next election are
the ones that are desperate to keep the
status quo in line or just aren't able
or capable of seeing that that's what it
will do.
Now, yes, I could be wrong.
But you know it's making sense, and you
know it's obvious to see how the
destabilization
2 party dynamic is all about pointing fingers
the other side, usually based on nothing.
They're both doing the same things. If they're
both the woke left, right, they're both canceling
you for different things. They're both censoring you
on speech. They're both leaning into hate speech.
Different angles, different flavors. It's all the same
thing.
Now we also talked about this from an
outside perspective. Foreign policy on August 16th. Weaponized
migration and experimentation.
Tools for subversion, division, and manufacturing consent happening
in the UK as we speak.
Running you know, causing all these chaotic well,
I think it's also tapered a little bit
down, but the point is continuing to cause
weaponized
migration, which that mean but like as as
always, weaponized migration can exist as a reality
alongside the fact that people are being
that there are innocent people caught up in
all of this. Right? The idea that it
gets turned into some kind of anti immigration
concept when you can see that it's being
weaponized,
it baffles me.
Obviously, web migration is weaponized for the purpose
of the fact that whether it's
malicious or not, a massive influx of people
will cause destabilization.
That's one reason why it's used. But on
top of that, it is used to make
you turn and hate yourselves,
attack other human beings
just because they're in this process while in
the reality, you're ignoring the strings of governments
that are using them to get you to
do exactly that. Whether it's about racial tensions,
whether it's about destabilization, whether it's about driving
in policy around immigration, it's constant. These things
are used to influence what you think. And
then really stoking those petty,
lowest common denominator
hate and and strife and and, you know
I mean, all the things that drive you
to be very small.
Attacking people based on who they are and
what they think and what they you know,
where they came from. Or deciding that if
you have a certain skin color, therefore you're
not the same. Which, by the way, is
everything Israel is right now.
Including Ethiopian Jews and it's not it's about
Zionism as always. But this is all influencing
and we can see the same thing in
this country or the UK or anywhere else.
It's obvious. And it's not just about the
left driving this to for votes or because
they wanna drive in woke policies. Like, it's
very small. That is a fraction of what's
really going on. There is an element of
this, but that is all one level of
the same kinda driving thing.
The next one we talk about
is the election discussion. This one was on
13th August. The Israeli election interference and psychological
operation industrial complex. This goes into Tal Hanon
and the idea that this is a class
I mean, this is a very important one
to watch. This guy is expli it's it's,
this is Guardian,
Heretz,
El Pais, I believe, and a multiple platforms
in, like, a 9 month investigation
and have video and everything. This is an
Israeli asset. They proved this in the conversation
who is working to influence elections around the
world. It's amazing how this is not a
bigger story. I think we all know why
though at this point.
And he is on the record saying that
out of 33 attempts to manipulate presidential level
elections
around the world,
27 were successful. And he mentions influencing US
policy. There's no discussion of which one and
where and how, but I think it's obvious
what we're talking about.
And this is undeniable, guys. And you're and
there are people that are hiding this, they're
leaning in with this. These people are and
they're manufacturing thou tens of thousands of bots
for bot farms, influencing Twitter as we speak.
This is the weaponization. It is an industrial
complex. It's all across the board.
Now coming up in the election,
this is really how we have to start
seeing this.
As, Liberty uncensored post this oh, I forgot.
I was actually gonna use this for the
main I'm I'm gonna use this for a
show, I'm sure, coming up. How are you
voting this year? Zionism or Zionism? I can
pull exactly.
Exactly agree with that. Now Elon Musk points
something out that I wanna make a larger
point about this in regard to how these
2 party illusion
tactics keep you from seeing the bigger picture.
As I just was gonna make this point
I'll link it again as we get into
more of the medical freedom stuff in the
next show, which I have lined up,
about the idea of, you know, the surface
level point. As he made this point about
the,
Trump and the the whole game of there's
good people on both sides in the way
that they clearly misrepresent that. As he was
simply as he makes an explicit point to
say, as I've always said, that they were
the white nationalists, but then they're all aside
from that, there are good people on both
sides, which is true. There were just honest
people out there who wanted to protest.
The idea that they ever I mean, that's
the point is that people wanna pretend that
you're either lying about it or you're not.
No. There's a whole group. I mean, in
fact, I think the majority of people that
can see and acknowledge that that's obviously a
misrepresentation.
They lied about what he said and then
also Trump's a war criminal and he's terrible.
I mean, it's those things can exist. It's
not that you're somehow a secret lefty because
you can have the
the integrity and have to call something out
for what it is even if it undermines
what you think you're you know, that that's
the problem is the paradigm makes people ignore
what they the truth when it goes against
their agenda. In this case, or at the
point before is he made it about Trump
saying that, and I was gonna show you
that well, his point was always look at
the source material. And I said, well, yes.
Exactly. Except that's not what you're actually doing.
You're pointing at the surface level, pretending it's
the source material. What I'm gonna show you
next is the source material. And he says
again, this person go oh, Charlie Kirk of
course says, dear Joe, for the 1000th time,
the very fine people story you keep repeating
is debunked and lying and hoax. Which I
frankly think that's why it keeps getting told.
I frankly think it's because it's a ridiculous
story that's very
if you can't see by now that how
everything seems to be driving you in Trump's
direction, I I don't think I can help
you. But
Snopes says no. Trump did not call them
very fine people. Even Snopes is helping Trump
at this point. But it says,
Elon Musk says, when Snopes knows, it's a
hoax.
Okay?
Remember, the point is source material. Right? Look
beyond well, that's that's this is the surface
level. And I said, well, now let's discuss
the group that was highlighted
as leading the march at Charlottesville, which is
what they're talking about,
which was called the Rise Above movement.
They are the US arm of the Ukraine's
Azov movement.
A a group, by the way, that our
entirety of government, left and right, and the
Israeli government all fund.
Think about that.
What you're discussing, Elon, that is the surface
level BS distraction. That's what that is. The
reality is that if you can recognize that
both sides or just your government are funding
the group that marched through there, also with
Israel,
to start off the whole white supremacy divide,
what you know, again, this was aimed at
Trump, white supremacists. You're an anti Semite. Remember
all that? Now they're the ones chiefly supported
by Israel.
How we can't see how ridiculous and confusing
and muddled that all is, it's because this
is all nonsense.
They were all funding the Azov movement or
rather the rise above movement, which was their
US arm, to create that division. And Trump
stood up and said very basic things, and
they misrepresent
him. So you go, no, Trump. You're he
he's the hero being
misrepresented. That's what I just can't stop seeing.
Either way, acknowledge that what he's doing is
keeping you fixated on the surface level conversation.
Everything he does, these one word, three word
responses are just like that, I think are
designed to keep you fixated in the 2
party system. That's what I think. But if
you haven't seen this, by the way, in
Newsweek, they break this down clearly, showing you
that they went international.
Germany has what's called the third path, which
is the that's that's Azov movement, that's Ukraine.
Germany, part of it, or America's
rise above movement, as well as Italy's cost
a pound. These are extensions of the rise
of or the Azov movement that's funded by
Israel
as well as the United States.
And then the overall point there,
oh, I think I have done here, or
maybe not,
was that this was something that the US
government has been funding
at least since 1948
Called Operation Aerodynamic. And I'll include that for
you if you wanna check it out.
Bottom line though is that this is the
bigger picture. And this go overlaps, by the
way, with the conversation of what they're doing
in Ukraine, the bio labs, and whatever else
they're working on that ties into just about
every other story. But make sure you look
into this. CIA's own document highlights that they
did this. This is where it gets into
the Michaela Lebed, the prologue company I just
talked about. They've been doing this for a
very long time. Israel's also funding them, and
they're also creating the very binary two party
division that interest them
at your expense, ladies and gentlemen. That's what
we're talking about.
Now Thomas Massie,
just, day before yesterday,
brought up the conversation of dual citizens.
And this is why this is so important
because we can literally see not just funding,
not just shell companies and different outsourced public
private partnerships, but people who have been literally
put into power
by Israel.
Now it's amazing to me that I even
say you know, that real still, as we're
even if we're talking about this, even as
Thomas Massie is making this point, that people
will still try desperately to make this about
racism. You're telling me that you'd be okay
with this if it was China?
If China was literally funding people who are
Chinese Americans to be in positions of congress
that you would be like, you racist. How
dare you have a problem with that? I
mean, we all know that's ridiculous. The very
people that are screaming about how you're racist
for making this point would lose their minds
if it was China.
That just shows you how, you know, childish
they are ultimately. Thomas Massie says dual citizens
elected to US state United States Congress should
renounce citizenship in all other countries.
At minimum,
they should disclose their citizenship in other countries
and abstain from votes specifically benefiting those countries.
Note,
he does not say Israel.
That's good good for him because the whole
point is obviously centered around that. But the
the point is they would love to make
that about you hating Jewish people, which is
not even remotely what we're talking about. We're
talking about an Israeli citizen. Why that has
anything to do with Judaism is only because
Zionism has taken advantage of that overlap. Lied
to you about it. You're an Israeli citizen.
You are an Israeli. You're not a Jewish
person because you're from Israel. I mean, the
idea clearly is is that I mean, I've
gone over this extensively for a long time.
There's a growing movement of Jews around the
world that are constantly calling out the fact
that Israel does not represent Jews. The star
of David, the these are all Zionist concepts
that have been turned into
exploiting Judaism.
And the point here is that we can
see
that this conflation of these two things. Right?
We're talking about you know, the the point
is if you're an American, that doesn't make
you Christian.
By saying you can't have an American citizen
doesn't mean you're against Christians. Same point here.
As much as they wanna conflate the two
things, there are plenty of Jews that do
not believe in Zionism or not believe in
Israel. So pretending that they conflate is about
you trying to make it only about Judaism.
All he's saying is dual citizenship. It's only
Israeli citizenship and a US citizenship.
Do you know I mean, are we are
we all aware that there are people that
live in Israel that aren't Jews?
So how so you're so isn't it insulting
for you to just broadly assume? See my
point? But no, it always works that way.
But Jordan Satchtell, who seems very blinded by
this conversation, did good work during COVID, says
I'm not aware of any dual citizens in
congress. I mean, really, man?
Like, I feel like he's he's trying to
kind of draw this out. But you realize
this is a public reality. Right? There's and
this is my point from before. It's not
even hidden. There's no I mean, like a
Brian Mast for example. It's not like they're
hiding that. For crying out loud, the guy
showed up in his IDF uniform. This is
not a secret. But they want you to
go this one and that one so they
can try to make it about you, making
it about you. That's what I would get
from that, but I'm assuming.
Thomas Massie says sounds like you could be
in favor of disclosure
then. Yeah. Right?
There are very clearly dual citizens in this
country that are in positions of power. So
then wouldn't anybody logical be like, well, yeah,
then we should definitely know about that. Right?
The only reason they're weird about this is
because it ties back to Israel. And then
he gives you some some pages here, some,
you know, articles that talk about this stuff.
Ted Cruz renounces newly discovered Canadian citizenship. Right?
See, he's making a point here.
Everybody wants to shoehorn this and make all
about Israel, but his point is, well, here's
some other people. That's Canadian. Doesn't so we're
just making a point about dual citizenship. Doesn't
that matter?
Just he's exposing how he he's doing well
in this conversation. Then he follows up saying,
what is your theory
about who maintains secret dual citizenship?
See, he's sniffing around the the idea it's
a conspiracy theory.
Pretty lazy, Jordan, I gotta admit. And the
point is Thomas says, I don't care which
members of congress hold additional citizenship in which
countries.
It's it's it's it's allowed if it's to
be allowed,
we should all disclose our citizenship because conflicts
of interest can rise. It's analogous to our
stock disclosures and our donor disclosures, which is
why Jordan then did not respond. Because you
didn't get it. You didn't you didn't
goad him in to making a statement that
you thought he was secretly wink wink talking
about Jews. That's what I think was happening
there. It's my my assumption. I'm only doing
that in the context of having the conversation.
I wouldn't blindly say he was doing that
unless I knew it. But that's what I
think is happening here. And on top of
that, I think we can see it all
over this conversation that everyone's in there. I'll
show you the one next.
Where they're really trying to call him out
for making it about Jews. Except he's explicitly
said the opposite.
I just I I'm almost I'm almost blown
away by how this obvious this is. Like,
for the good people out there that are
objective, who may just yet yet to see
that you're being misled, doesn't that stand out
to you like a sore thumb? Yes. Obviously,
we should care about this idea. But the
fact that nobody wants to make it okay
if you're talking about 1 or even the
idea of the conversation in general now is
somehow
taboo just because it exposes a problem for
Israel.
I find that to be shockingly crazy.
Now this person does the same thing. He
tags it
and says, who are these quote dual citizens
in congress?
Thomas Massie. The people in your replies certainly
think they know, you know what he's referencing,
because there are no dual yeah. There really
are. I mean, it's it's not not just
exclude Israel from the conversation. There are other
dual citizens that have nothing to do with
Israel. But it's amazing how sensitive this is.
And he says,
there's no dual citizens who should in congress
I know of, who should in congress I
know of, unless, of course, you just mean
Jews.
Very subtle, bud. And he says, why not
just say it if that's what you're getting
at? But you so you're saying,
if that's what you mean. But why don't
you just say it if that's what you
well, you haven't concluded he is saying that
yet. Very it's it's just so shockingly clear.
But this person says, he's freaking right about
this. He says, okay. If you think it's
a big problem, name 1.
Oh, challenge accepted. Guess what? Elon Omar.
And he goes, Elon, I don't know our
citizenship status. But even so, that's one person.
It's not got absolutely nothing to do with
sign.
Ah, okay. And I said, nay one, not
that one. How transparently dishonest you are.
Like my god, man. Just let it you
just you might you should respond at that
point. I don't even know. Okay. So if
you're literally standing on this argument as if,
what are these supposed dual citizens, you liar?
And then you don't even know their citizenship
status?
So clearly,
these are people either that are coming from
a dishonest place because they're defending Israel blindly
or
who are only of the mind of this
conversation, like, let's, for example, CJ Hopkins in
occupied congress, that you are unable
to, you know, break away from your perceptions
and see that this is a valid discussion
to be had. The idea that there are
obviously dual citizens and we should be having
it, but they can only see it through
the lens of dual citizen means you hate
Jews, so they're just incapable
of standing back and seeing that. The CHJ
Hopkins accused me of being a white nationalist
for saying that our government is occupied.
I'm not saying the Zog buzzword term as
you would see it through some kind of
racial concept.
Even though we're generally making a similar point.
I'm simply saying, if you can't see that
our congress is explicitly
influenced by a foreign power, which you could
call occupied, you could call influence, then you're
blinding yourself to it. But then to go
as far as to call me a racist
for pointing that out, you're also just wrong.
I'm not. I don't think that. But you
see, it's it's this people get trapped in
this. I'm not trying to remove the voters'
accountability,
but this is what propaganda does to people.
So the point is that whether she
has citizenship elsewhere, which is the point. I
think it's,
what was it?
I forget. I look well, look, it's what?
Somalia, I think, or something like that. The
bottom line is that there are people that
have outside outside of Israel.
But all they can do is try to
shoehorn this into one thing or the other
that has nothing to do with the main
point.
Now ask yourself why that is such a
weird conversation.
Obviously, we should care. Obviously, they would care
if it was China or Russia or anybody.
So this is showing you the outlines of
how clearly we're being manipulated. Now here is
a clip about an example of how this
could like, this is it's sort of
this this point is sort of disjointed,
but I wanted to play here somewhere in
the show today just to show you how
important this is, how long this has been
going on.
So this is about the US's liberty.
And realizing that over the years, we have
had people through APAC, through a you know,
ADL spy groups, through different shell companies, put
people in positions of power.
We've watched it happen. APAC has literally funded
people right into power who may not even
necessarily
see themselves as an asset of Israel, but
are influenced enough because of that money, like,
I mean, in in an endless amount of
examples,
who in fact are.
At the very least, have levers that can
be pulled when Israel needs that to happen.
So ask yourself after all this time that
people being put in these positions, why
it only seems
more
in the, indebted or controlled by some out
by by Israel in particular
than before, even though more and more people
are exposing these things.
With things like this, they go back as
far as you can look.
Bombing a US military ship
and then having enough power all the way
back then to not only cover it up,
but to get them to literally put out
a fake story about what ultimately happened. Knowing
that there are Americans that were survived. That
still to this very day tell you what
you're about to hear. Now what I love
about this clip is that they don't even
mention the word Israel.
But if you watch this, you re if
you
look for the point is that is what
they're discussing. And everyone speaking this, you can
find other conversations of the the point is
they put this out, so it starts the
conversation. That you watch this and go, wow.
How what what and then you you barely
scratch past what they're saying, and it you
know, they're talking about Israel.
Well done. It's well done. This is what
we're dealing with now
everywhere. We really came.
Oh, and that's the other larger point. They're
saying how close we came to something much
bigger. How do we have I mean, this
this times a 100 with what they're doing
right down in the Middle East.
Do a potential nuclear holocaust. You know how
much press the nuclear warheads got when they
landed in Cuba? The Stanford World Thermonuclear
War. Well, this was a 1,000 times worse,
but nobody knows about it.
Another victim was the United States naval vessel
Liberty. She was mistaken for an Egyptian vessel
and Israeli ships and planes, torpedoes, and straighter.
The story of the Liberty is not a
who done it. It's a whined it. The
casualties were high. 34 American dead and 75
wounded. There were arguments later about how the
era happened.
The reality of what happened is it was
not a mistake, and it they wanted to
sink us, and what does that mean to
this country?
Case closed. Mistaken identity. We're very sorry. Is
there anything else I can help you with?
Well, there's there's no question.
It was a big cover up, from the
top on down. What did we do wrong?
Why were we why are we being labeled
the bad guys and get we can't talk
about it. For the next
40 plus years, I never said anything to
anyone.
No.
Never.
I knew it'd be the end of my
career if I said anything. In the Naval
Security Group, everything was secret.
So just one additional secret you had
to keep. You just couldn't. I mean, imagine
this if if after all this time, if
this is still suppressed, despite there being members
of the US, like, veterans that are walking
around telling you're you're looking at them, talking
to anyone that will listen about how this
was the reality, how they knew Israel did
this, and they were told to cover it
up. And still to this day, that's called
conspiracy theory in in the mainstream circles.
If you can't see the ability of the
the the obvious outline of control right there
from a foreign government over not just our
policy, over our media, over our discussion points,
over what we're allowed to say. If you
wanna pretend that's only about Jewish people, you
are blinding yourself to the real problem.
Biden is literally a Christian Zionist. And if
we can't recognize how that has gotten to
be the case,
I can't I just I I don't know
what else I can do to show you.
Talk about it. It was such a secret
and with our
lives threatened. And who knows if they were
monitoring us or doing whatever. You ever repeat
one word
about the USS Liberty and who did it
to you, I guarantee I'll see you in
Leavenworth
or worse.
You know what worse means?
When you're told by the president of the
United States, secretary of defense,
to keep your mouth shut,
don't say anything,
and that's the direct order. Israel had America
by the scruffle of the neck.
And such was the need to cover up
what America got up to during the since
day war.
This is a girlfriend from the Mossad told
him that he could raise all kinds of
money to continue the Vietnam war.
Oh, I I I guess I missed it.
There wasn't there was one mention of Israel
right there. I I I when I was
first passing it, I thought it was kind
of interesting that they didn't even mention the
word Israel, but I guess I just missed
the one. But very few, you can tell.
Obviously, this is exactly what it's about. But
right there, just as as I stopped it,
that's important to think about, going back to
Nixon.
Literally, his girlfriend was a member of Mossad.
Think about how long this has been going
on.
He had been contacted
by a man with a hoarse voice who
said that he'd been a pilot and attacked
at Liberty, and suddenly he disappears. There's no
record. I can only suspect that it was
as he feared. They deported him. They turned
him over to the Israelis,
took him back to Israel, court marshaled him
secretly, and maybe had executed.
The liberty is a microcosm of this much
bigger problem in the Middle East,
and Americans need to know what happened. The
story has to be told.
And so that we were under attack by
unknown
jet aircraft.
They say get over it.
You don't get over something like this. It
haunts you. The men would bring the body
pieces up to me, and I
tried to put them together to make a
body out of them. I don't know what
the hell happened, and I haven't taken time
to find out. I I know nothing about
them. What I'm about to tell you is
for your ears only, you will not propel
anyone during my lifetime.
I I'm surprised I can't even talk about
that.
Never say it.
That type of horror,
your body is not gonna remember. Your brain
cycle record.
I think we sacrificed a lot of people
for,
no good reason.
Sacrificing liberty.
I am not Make sure you cannot anything
about delivery, period.
That's that last clip is Robert McNamara,
secretary of defense while this is happening.
I am not saying anything about delivery, period.
Right. Right. Sacrificing liberty is what it's called.
I recommend you check it out.
So one thing I wanna include before we
go into some other conversation about Whitney and
and and her being, you know, attacked as
an anti Semite and go into more of
the broader Israel genocide conversation. Robert Menotti has
been posting these recently.
This is August 19th.
Universal declaration of human rights, article 19.
Quote, everyone has the right to freedom of
opinion and expression.
This right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference
and to seek,
receive, and impart
information and ideas through any media and re
and any media and regardless of frontiers.
So the point is obviously, from an international
perspective,
you have the right to express your thoughts.
But what's interesting right in this moment
is you've got the left and the right
from a US perspective actively telling you certain
thoughts are not allowed.
Both point at the other and say, problem.
The reality is your government in any way
you look at it is trying to use
your words to keep you divided, but also
justify stopping you from being able to access
certain things, gain certain monetary returns, or be
able to speak at all.
And and and right now, how many times
we can show you that
a whole part of the right conversation right
now is justifying
censorship, shutting down a protest, canceling people from
their job because they've got opinions about Israel
or Donald Trump.
Such shocking hypocrisy.
But this is important to think about. It's
not just the US. Around the world, it's
the same thing.
Yes. You have a right to express your
opinions. Even if those opinions are racist.
I have a right to say you're disgusting
for having those opinions. But we both have
that right.
Without interference and to seek, receive, and impart
information and ideas through any media. The point
is right now, across the world, we can
see this. So you this is something it's
a universal declaration of human rights that everyone's
assigned on to, but yet they actively ignore
these things. Because none of these governments truly
care about I mean, I don't think they
take anything sacred.
Anything.
Here's the actual declaration if you'd like to
look at it. We've referenced this in the
past. Here's the other one he posted on
the 8th.
Article 10
of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Different act, by the way, but still the
different point. So there's a lot of these
that float around.
This is about freedom of expression.
But for instance, during COVID 19 time frame,
we referenced UNESCO. Right? The documents about, your
your rights in regard to medications and so
on. I mean, they they all these things
are out there. They just simply don't care.
Article 10 protects your right to hold your
opinions and to express them freely without government
interference.
This includes
the right to express your views aloud, for
example, through public protests and demonstrations, or through
public articles, booklets, leaflets, television, or radio broadcasting.
But of course, they don't agree with that.
They decide there are limitations to your speech
and Twitter is leading the right leading the
way.
Now think about this in the context of
the larger point I'm always making about absolute
free speech.
I'm all I'm completely open to having a
debate conversation about whether there should be limits.
I don't think so. I disagree. And I'll
stand by that. I have plenty of arguments
for it. But I'm not the kind of
person that's gonna say you're somehow a shill
or a lot because you have the other
opinion. Even if you are actually, I'll still
happily converse about it as long as you
don't act like
a ridiculous person.
The point is that that being said, I'm
open to the differences there and whether we
should consider those changes. But for instance, fire
in a theater. Classic point we always use
to talk to mark the line where suddenly
you're over
well, again, I've always said, if we're actually
gonna believe in free speech,
that would be include that kind of statement.
And people that decide to act irrationally without
information based on that would be their actions
and their responsibility.
Now I I understand the logic. I really
do. And I get it. And if you
wanna have a conversation about why that should
be the case, I'm open to it. I
think there are logical arguments that could be
made that I wouldn't even understand. I wouldn't
necessarily agree with, I think, because I on
the side of absolute or just free speech.
The problem is that the moment we started
taking away your responsibility for your actions because
of what they did,
we started losing ourselves.
In just in this one point of the
conversation. But the same old examples exist in
all of your rights. Everywhere. 2nd amendment. I
mean, everywhere you look, there's been slow efforts
to to dismantle that
sacred reality.
Again, they don't give you your rights. They
are inherent god given rights that they're supposed
to be honoring, and they're not.
So my point would be that if you
were to stand up and say, I think
there's a fire in this theater. Even if
you're lying. That is your expressing your opinion
or your view.
That's what that is.
Now again, we should debate it. I I
would be the first to say that standing
up and screaming out in a theater would
make you a terrible person. Say you're trying
to get people hurt, but I would protect
your right to say what you think and
so on. You see my point? But my
line is better made in regard to just
whether you're being censored for saying things they
claim as hate speech. Because that, for sure,
we can all agree on. But the difference
is now people on the party side are
starting to make their own weird lines, and
they're not linear, guys. It's all over the
place about this. You know, everything except unless
that one will circle around that. Oh, no.
You can't say that. You can't talk about
Israel, but everything else, healing is Saving free
speech on Twitter, but you can't talk about
Palestine.
It's everywhere. Everywhere. So my point, as always,
is to stand back from either of these
die binary games of the 2 party sides.
Either of the sides, I guess. And just
see this for what it really is. That
there are efforts from any side to be
able to restrict you
in one way or another. And you shouldn't
be okay with that. Whatever side it's coming
from. And then I'll include that human rights
act as well.
So that point obviously is, you know, here's
Whitney Webb.
Very, very, you know, an important person in
this conversation. She's obviously done amazing work
that really cuts away at the base of
the problem. And I think that's obviously why
she gets attacked.
And obviously why people all the way like,
they're even like the the I've often peep
seen people make arguments about, like, oh, she
gets invited on these larger shows. And yeah.
Sure. I mean, like, first of all, which
I doubt anybody else out there would refuse.
But nonetheless, my point has always been that
her work is fantastic.
Her work is absolutely groundbreaking, and it does
break through in very sourced and provable ways.
And so you get people that are new
to the conversation that suddenly go, my god.
Look at this. It's not just some statement
on a piece of paper. She's proving what
she's saying. And so it draws in people
like that. And usually, I would argue, once
it becomes such a prominent conversation, eat for
the people that you may not think are
genuine, they still wanna use her momentum. Right?
So my point is that if you if
if your only argument is that she is
somehow
influencing, that means x, y, and z. I
I mean, it's it's it's a
I think it's an interest in trying to
diminish something, not based on whether she's actually
like, it's obvious to me that what she's
doing is having an outs an out
an obvious positive effect. Outstanding or outstanding, like,
obviously changing the conversation for a lot of
people.
And I think that's what this is. So
my point in saying that is that she
got invited on
Neil Oliver's show. Which I thought he was
I I pointed out plenty of good things
he was doing during COVID and different monologues
he had that I thought were good. But
I'm I haven't really been immersed in his
work. But those people would argue that somehow
that he's, you know, missing that or lying
about this, whatever. You can decide for yourself.
I've I've seen plenty of good things that
come out of his show. But
she he invited her on.
They had a really big talk about a
lot of different things which are very contentious.
And as Elle Reed Whitty said about it
first, and everyone's losing their mind about it.
Like, she literally got called on the, the
this was on the front page of the
UK times.
Or just the times, I guess. Neil Oliver
video blocked by YouTube over anti semitism claims.
And I think there was even one who
mentioned her in the title. But either way,
Whitney Webb is like the prominent this she's
the focal point of this.
And so my What's frustrating about this is
that I think that people are so quick,
whoever they are by the way, to diminish
the reality as anti semitic inside mainstream circles
because there are so many people in that
circle without Even with all the information that's
come out today,
that's always been there and been verifiable, but
now it's been forced into public conversation.
That yet they're still so cowed along by
the worry of what the rest of their
click will call them.
I mean, like, in in in these inner
circle, like, that's why it's that's why for
someone like me for example, I'm not afraid
to be canceled. Canceled from what? I'm already
being I mean, they're using the tools they
have against me already. And I just mean
as an establishment, as a whether it's about
Israel or anybody else. But I'm not worried
about financial in because I they've already boxed
me out. I'm not worried about losing some
mainstream job. So there's not really much they
could do to cancel me by calling me
anti semite. Right? But there there are people
out there, I argue, oh, shit, he's not
one of them, but there are people out
there that are certainly invested in the mainstream
part of it. Even if they're fighting on
the outskirts
that that are worried about getting canceled as
it were from left or right. Because realize,
this is not just a left thing right
now. This is mo I would argue more
so the right coming after them for highlighting
things about Israel right now. Same game about
the left and right.
But it I think it's just so important
to see how clearly this is about you
know, it kinda demolishes those outlines, and really
it's about trying to bring down anybody who's
trying to break through the bigger picture
into some binary thing. And the point is,
I I don't think it's gonna work here.
But there are a lot of people that
would read this and go, oh, okay. So
we should ignore what she says because they
said she was racist.
And it still works to some degree, but
it's been diminished. Here's what she said. The
Times, and now other mainstream groups in the
UK, are smearing her as, quote, anti semitic
conspiracy theorist for discussing, in an interview with
Neil Oliver, the very real and easy to
prove it, you look up the Operation Underworld
and how it spurred an alliance between organized
crime in the US and later Israeli intelligence
that has persisted for decades.
Objectively, easy to prove. It's reality.
They have to twist her words to make
it anti Semitic. Obviously, I mean, to me,
this just screams desperation.
She says as as she this is what
she wrote. As I clearly stated, it involved
both the Italian mafia
and the Jewish mob, a matter of record,
by the way, easy to look up, and
claimed that I said this group runs the
world, which she did not, when I instead
said they composed one influential faction of a
global elite.
Think think of how lazy it is to
turn that sentence into Jews run the world.
Embarrassing for the times, I agree, as as
she writes, I have a 1,000 page book
with an insane number of footnotes proving my
case that has yet to be proven wrong.
You can read it for free. Here's the
archive.
She goes, I spoke at length about Leslie
Wexner, Epstein's main patron, and a man who
has clear mob ties and who was hugely
influential in the Israeli lobby. AIPAC. There you
go. He also proudly told New York Magazine
in 19 eighties that he believed
he was spiritually possessed.
She goes on to say,
conflating Leslie Wexner and other organized crime linked
figures like the Bromfans with Bromfans with all
Jews implies that my criticism of them, organized
crime ties plus corruption, are part of Jewish
identity. Plus, that it is actually anti semitic.
Right? So which this is so this is
what I so
embarrassing and hilarious.
What they did was anti semitic if you
wanna make it. If it's not again, I'm
not you it's it's the misrepresentation
of the term semitic. I get it. I'm
just saying in their conversation,
what they're calling anti semitic
is what they just did. Like, so what
she's saying is
the opposite. She's very clearly outlining the different
overlaps and the different d deviations and groups.
The Italian mob versus them. They're the ones
trying to make that what she said into
that they all run. So what I guess
inadvertently or maybe by design. And then I
actually think it was part of Zion here.
This is what Zionist
Zionism does.
It creates the hatred against people.
Really, it should be aimed at them, but
they then misdirected towards Jews to justify their
presence.
There are plenty of Jews around the world
that are calling that out right now.
What she's saying is that by making it
about specifically or rather them claiming Wexner and
the rest of them are are what they
claim are all Jews. I mean, they're literally
making their argument. They're the ones doing what
they're claiming she's doing. I mean, you gotta
laugh at how dumb that is. And she
says, it is like conflating criticisms of the
Rockefellers or Silicon Valley oligarchs as anti American.
Not being able to criticize these oligarchs breeds
anti semitism.
Exactly. And, again, I think that is quite
literally part of the design.
But
doing the very things that they like, in
in a very clumsy way, trying to protect
a very clear lie.
And so people then push right through it.
And then you they fall into this trap
where they they think that they're seeing the
thing they're hiding. It's I I can't stop
seeing this right now. Like, we somehow digressed
in this conversation where if they simply just
go, don't do that, oh, that must be
the thing. Or they're not the one, though
they must be the one. Like, we can't
be this simple. And it's more so on
the right than anywhere right now.
That Trump's the tax, so he's the guy.
It's like, come on, guys. We can't think
past that one very clear step.
I mean, really. So my point is with
Zionism, they're ultimately doing things like that, where
they, you know, that's blood libel. And then
if you even look it up, it's like
a very valid and obvious thing that you
can prove. So then that people who don't
look any further then assume that then they
must be it must be about the Jews.
That must be what they're hiding.
But it's not. It's a simple step like
we just made clear. They're trying to make
it seem as if by hiding that that
you they hope you will assume that it
must be the opposite.
I mean, how long has this been going
on? We must be able to think deeper
than that.
She writes going forward, happy to debate anybody
from the Times or anyone in the UK
without smearing them. You know, you know that'll
never happen. Same with, like,
Barnes and the rest of them. You know,
love to lob these empty criticisms of as
Whitney and clearly protecting something.
And then she'll come out and say, well,
let's debate about it. Oh, we'll run away.
Nobody wants to get into it. Oh, no.
I don't have my time for you. Well,
then why'd you make the argument? The point
is that there are a lot of people
that love to try to undermine her work.
Very few, if none, as far as I
can tell.
Any of them, in including the one that
has been saying it from the very beginning,
who have ever been shown to be correct.
And in fact, are very petty in the
arguments they make.
Matthew Sweet was the one one of the
ones that shared this. This is what he
actually said about this. My the video violated
YouTube community guidelines. First of all, don't you
love how this is still used as some
kind of a metric of whether it's good
or not? You know, one of the the
platform that censored under flimsy guidelines about things
that we prove were correct like myocarditis
or right now around Israel.
But a lot of these mindless followers, they're
told it's okay or not because YouTube said.
Right? I mean, are you 6 years old?
You can't decide for yourself? YouTube dictates what
you think is real or not? Yep. Apparently.
But it says they violated it. It claims
a global oligarchy descended from the Jewish mob,
rules the world using false charges of antisemitism
to protect it. That's what they that's what
this guy
reduced this down to.
She didn't say that even remotely,
as I just read you what she actually
said. And he puts Jewish mob in quotes.
This guy is a child. If you can't
do the basic due diligence to realize that's
not a, in quotes, fouls, fealty, it's a
provable reality in history during prohibition.
But I guess you're just not allowed to
say that or he's knowingly misrepresenting it for
other interests.
He says, so yes. If you want anti
semitic views from the coast guy, then you
have to go to Ramble.
Sad. And of course, he works for BBC,
which is like, I'm embarrassed for you.
Now,
this is an interesting overlap.
Right now, we are inundated with manipulations. Right?
There are people in the media that are
absolutely they're not knowing they're being used or
willfully lying to you.
Independent as well.
But there's also we have these examples of
people that are going out and trying to
deliberately misrepresent. And we keep seeing this through
all of the protests. It's still happening. And
it's usually when you see it. Protest like
this. Where this woman who's already been found
out and exposed for exactly the opposite of
what she was pretending to be, goes out
and stands there with these signs. I'm not
gonna say it out loud. Ford Fisher was
there. But you can classee for the show
what that says.
A ridiculous,
old, broken sign that took her half a
second it seems to make with some kind
of white marker that says
f
you know, I'm just the worst slurs against
black people, against Jewish people, Nazi symbols. It
says on the side, fascism now.
I mean, this is the kind of lazy
stuff we get from people trying to it's
one of 2 things. This is either the
laziest representation of what they want you to
think the Palestinian protests are doing. They're not.
Or
this is what they actually think.
Like, this is a woman who believes this
is what they are actually saying. Either way,
I'm embarrassed for her.
And the point is,
the and and one of her tweets is
that she says literally not a Zionist, just
a passionate Jew who won't take s h
I t from anyone calling me a colonizer.
But you if you listen to what she
says in this, here's even Myles Chong, here's
the actual tweet, saying who is she?
This person responds by and by the way,
this is disgusting person saying disgusting things that
are anybody in anyone with a brain should
be able to call out. Unless you just
genuinely think that black people and Jews should
be called bad names. Which, again, doesn't matter
what your stance is. I find it to
be just objectively disgusting to make criticism or,
you know, blatant racist allegations against people just
because of their skin color. That's not some
kind of a lefty concept. That just makes
you a gross person. The point here
is that this person responds going, is this,
based?
Which by the way just means like good
or cool or whatever they use it as.
I don't know. What's going on right now?
Ian Miles Chong literally responds by saying, she
seems based.
What?
I just I'm convinced this guy is a
complete influence machine that has nothing to do
with the truth. But the point is, she's
literally standing there with this that says all
the worst
racial slurs you could imagine.
Fascism now,
Nazi symbols.
Yeah. She's trying to pretend this is what
she's out there fighting for against the Israelis.
Right?
She seems based?
I I you guys can make of that
what you will.
But this person says, I thought she was
a next level satirist, like, being a satire,
but I've just listened to her on a
space. They somebody found her, invited her on
this space. And I may not it may
not be performance art. She may actually believe
it. Well, that is what they want you
to think at the moment. But the point
is if you actually find her accounts which
you can find right now, she's just what
she said back in 2023.
Goyim be mad because Israel is the most
technologically advanced country in the world and not
that most modern developments were implemented or invented
by Jews. Stay mad, inbred Anglo Saxons.
Okay. So clearly, she's coming from a very
supremacist mindset, but it has nothing to do
with anything but pro Israel.
So here she is coming out, pretending to
be somebody on the Palestinian side, and acting
like she's fighting for all these racist things
because can't you tell that's what they're all
doing? I mean, is it really this simple?
Are they really this bad at trying or
is it just this very lost human being
who is influenced by the rest of that
very bad stuff?
I'm not talking about the Israeli propaganda trying
to frame people out there fighting for self
determination and independence.
It's embarrassing. And here's a guy from the
Palestinian side trying to speak to her about
it, and it's just embarrassing. My point though
is this is everywhere.
And people are falling for this stuff, and
this is the kind of 2 party division
we're dealing with. And really, it's not just
about Israel, mind you, but this is the
most obvious example.
So for a more important point about this,
what what we just saw with that that
girl with the dumb sign, that is designed
to divide.
Excuse me. That is designed
to muddy the waters.
And so what I can't stop seeing right
now, especially from the right with this conversation,
using in important things, is there are people
out there that are designed, in my opinion,
to hurt this.
To take this conversation and drive it in
a way, you know, to talk in very
similar ways that what we're talking about. But
ultimately drive this into a direction that allows
it to be dismissed, like we've talked about
with a lot of these groups in the
past, like Jones and the rest of them.
So I'm not sure where to place Candace
in all this. I think that what she's
done in the rest I've seen a lot
of stuff she put out that I think
is good. I think it's talking about important
things.
But she's this kind of central role in
this evolution of what we're discussing around Zionism
right now. Which I don't know why that's
the case. Even by her own admission, she's
only just started talking about this. So it's
ama that to me, I'm very suspicious about
that. Doesn't have to she could be used
in that same way. My point is there
are people that have been breaking this down
in a very objective, academic way for a
very long time. Look at somebody like Zachary
Foster, has a PhD in Palestine history. He's
been talking about this for a very long
time. From Princeton, mind you.
And yet these are the people that are
driving this conversation. So in my mind, that's
either because there's someone who's trying to manipulate
that through her without her knowing it, and
that doesn't mean that she's doing bad work,
Or it could be that she is leading
this. My point is not even about her.
I just recognize how that's a weird dynamic
there where she's suddenly sort of, like, driving
this. But it's the fact that she invites
Andrew Tate and his brother in this conversation.
Which I it continually blows my mind
that anybody gives these people the time of
day, let alone
influence or that they have some in kind
of or intelligent take on anything. Other than
just kind of grasping at platitudes and general
understandings
and then calling things the matrix all the
it's embarrassing.
I'm sure they'll come after me for making
points like this. I've already done it before.
Very bitch, very vindictive. But at the end
of the day, these people are deceivers.
I mean, it's objective as far as I'm
concerned, but you guys can decide for yourself.
She says this and this, Dan is the
one that kinda went viral for speaking with,
Patrick Patrick Peck David. Patrick Bet David.
And made some excellent points. It was real
And again, he's someone who's saying I've just
kinda gone through this and suddenly started seeing
it and nobody's saying about it, so good
for him for speaking about it. Now, I
I don't listen to a little bit of
it. To me, it seems like Tate just
kinda tried to take over from the very
beginning.
Either way, and I said, before it started
by the way, was the Tate will only
cheapen and ultimately destroy
what you're trying to do here.
How can you not see right through them?
And again, if you wanna get mired in
stupidity, jump down through this conversation. You know,
some most of them anyway.
But David Eich had this to say, then
I'll read what Paulie said about it. And
I'll also show you some of these clips
from Milk Bar TV who's done an amazing
job exposing, without question, what the tapes are.
Like, it's it's just no way and I
asked you what that's what David says, and
I'll read his tweet here. He says, much
of what Candace Owens says has validity.
I and I agree. Supported by researchable evidence.
Agree.
He says what I find incomprehensible
is why her go to source on Zionism
is professional bullshitter Andrew Tate.
Now, to be fair, whatever you think about
anything,
that is rather strange.
It is. Like, why Tate would be the
one? Really?
Like, he's not even in his own conversations,
he's not some expert on Zionism. He's an
instigator.
He's a guy who stuck his finger in
the middle of this and tries to pretend
using a lot of things that seem like
I mean, like, I'm not gonna get into
it at depth, but my I've already broken
this down in the past.
We make statements that are basically plucking out
the kind of e the the zeitgeist. The
same thing I talk about when I just
say with Outlook or Loom or the rest
of them. They love to throw these things
in there, kind of grabbing at what is
generally the expect expectation
or what might be the next thing to
happen or just the,
you know, coming after this as Jews running
the world and making these kind like, you
you they're taking the secondary
what's the best way to frame it? And
this is what I didn't wanna get. The
point is that ultimately, making statements that I
can prove to you are not flushed out
with evidence, that are not backed by some
kind of understanding, but rather just what they
think you want to hear, the way you
want to hear it, and then lean in
with one kind of outside or the other.
Or call things the matrix, which the matrix
is a really I mean, what are we
talking for? I mean, I mean, did you
anyway. It's just like you're you're about 10
years too late in the conversation for using
the word the bottom line is that we're
at a point where we're being misled by
a lot of ID logs that are using
what you wanna hear against you. And I
can't see a better example of that than
people like this, that are objectively disgusting
bad people.
They're lying to Tucker and Candace and why
they allowed them to have that stage to
say things that we can immediately prove without
question were false. They're on video saying the
things they claim weren't true. It's crazy.
So I I get it's weird that this
would be the one they go to. He
goes on to say, I have watched endless
Tate interviews to get a grasp on what
he's about, and it's a real it's a
a really pinch me experience to see him
deny in mainstream
interviews what he admits in his own videos.
As always, there's so much more to know
about all of this in good time, I
guess.
Then they gave him platforms, and they just
nodded I mean, Tucker's interview with him was
almost giddy.
Like, giggling along with him and laughing. I
was like, not an interview based on and
just letting him spill out all of his
lies.
Pauley says, I think they're putting tape center
stage on this because he is a lonesome
character who will soon be all over the
news for heinous crimes.
Thus, Candace and everything she ever said will
be discarded,
including the truth she's speaking about Jewish power.
Now you could argue that's Simon. That's what
Hersh Shaben says.
And to be clear, as I've always said,
there is a very I mean, look, I'm
not the one claiming to be about, like,
the Jewish power party is the name of
a literal party inside the Knesset, the Lukud
coalition.
Or the fact that they write documents about
Jewish supremacy or the bestseller, the Israeli group
will call it Jewish supremacy because there is
this very clear element. My point is always
that it's not it's you could just as
easily say Christian power because there are just
more even Christian Zionists. And I believe it's
about Christian or rather Zionism and their influence
through both. Now I don't need to keep
explaining that, but I think it's important for
those that only catch certain parts of the
show. So all she's saying is that what
she's highlighting will then be tarnished by the
reality of what these people are.
Now maybe that's the case. Maybe that she's
being tricked into it. I mean, there's weird
overlaps to her and history with Tate and
so on, but at the end of the
day, maybe she's being forced into it. I
don't know. But I completely agree with this.
Here are some things to include. Oh, I
forgot about this. Here's what Kim dotcom had
to say about
it. Andrew Tate does a space with Candace
and Dan,
Bilzerine?
Bilzerian?
I I forgot I don't wanna say his
last name. The one from the Patrick McDavid
show. Here's the account.
It doesn't wanna load. And he says, they
did a space about Zionist destroying America. And
days later,
Tate
gets raided and arrested.
So certainly could mean everything. Right?
Or it just could be timing the the
idea that this guy was an all all
white to read what Milk Bar TV says.
The point is, guys, he's under invest he's
already about to be arrested.
This is all this has to do with
a thousand of things other than this space
that he was on. He realized the mindless
things he was saying are being discussed by
people all over the Internet right now. It
says Americans must understand, and this is what
Kim says, that neither Russia, China, nor Iran
are your enemies. I agree with that. Those
who buy your politicians and control their media
are. But by the way, that could be
the Chinese government, that could be the Russian
government, that could be the Iranian government. I
just frankly think that it's by and large
obviously
Israel, or rather Zionists wherever they reside, but
at the end of the day,
he frames this as, without saying it, that
because Andrew Tate was arrested, that means it's
because he talks about Zionism.
I it's certainly possible. I'm not gonna pretend
that I know otherwise, but I can prove
to you that, as we'll show you here,
this person was already born this this I
I even as Pauley was saying, this is
the guy who's about to be arrested. He
is a sex trafficker, guys. This is not
up for debate. This guy is a disgusting
human being who has, on the record, talking
about what he's done to women over the
years. It really I I don't even wanna
get into it because it makes me sick.
I have a very sensitive spot for this
for a lot of reasons in my past
around things that have been done to women
that I know. And this kills me to
watch somebody who is on the record
talking about how he has takes pleasure in
watching women suffer or watching what he's done
to them or exploiting them. And then get
up there and get an audience with the
largest platform like Tucker and Candace and get
to act like he's being a persecuted hero.
And then good people fall for it. Because
it's easy to to to to to
it's easy to believe that you're being misled
from the mainstream. It's the easiest thing in
the world to believe right now. Milkmore point
this out. This is from
today.
It's clear Andrew Tate's camp is and this
is he's talking about the what we just
discussed. It's clear Andrew Tate's camp BS narrative.
See, I keep saying it wrong. Andrew Tate's
camp's BS narrative. For the new accusations, is
they're being persecuted for their reactions about Jews
or recent comments.
These new accusations have been investigated for over
a year, the ones he's being arrested for.
Here's a clip dating back to 2023.
K? So what now what you're seeing now
is that is there he just like he's
been doing the entire time since he became
what he is, He is co opting what's
going on for his benefit.
Hey. I I I I would be willing
to bet that has nothing to do with
anything he just said. This is about the
fact that this person is already going to
jail for other things and they're trying to
co opt. I wouldn't be willing to argue
this is more so about Zionism using him
to hide what they're actually talking about. Using
him to hide what they're actually talking about.
And and channel it into hatred for Jews
entirely, which is exactly what they want.
But here's another clip.
I thought that was a picture. I didn't
know that's Oh, yeah. I'll include that actually.
Here's the just the
search under Milk Bar TV specifically. He has
a lot a lot of work on this.
It goes back a long time, exposing what
they are.
Here's one, Andrew Tate is truly a monster.
Let's hope we're finally seeing him getting the
justice he deserves for the horrific things he's
done to women and girls.
Well, I'm gonna do this real quick. I
wasn't planning on playing these, but I think
it's important.
So you can listen to some of the
stuff that he's on record saying.
Again, I recommend you watch Milk Bar TV
because he has I mean, right when this
was ongoing in the bit, like, when he
was being persecuted, when he was on Tucker,
Milk Bar TV, rather specifically right after Candace's
interview, he broke this down and did everything
he said and and then showed you the
clip alongside of it. Him explicitly, repeatedly saying
the opposite of what he said on those
interviews.
I I just it really is incredible to
me that anybody was snowed by this guy.
Am
I a bad person? Because the the more
you didn't like it, the more I enjoyed
it. I loved how much you hated it.
Turned me on.
Why am I like that? Fighting now will
be Why? Whilst we were having sex, he
put his hand on my throat and strangled
me until I lost consciousness.
But he he was still having sex with
me when I kind of
came back around again. I am one of
the most dangerous men on this planet. Sometimes
you forget exactly how lucky you were to
get by me. Would you rather me pin
you down and make you do things you
didn't like, or would you
You didn't like that I was thinking I
can do whatever I want to.
That's what it is. I'm the smartest person
on this planet.
And then the next day, one of the
whites of my eyes had gone completely red.
Apparently Yeah. Just the record,
you could take for what you will from
this woman anonymously or the BBC who's rep
representing it.
I'm more con what I'm showing you more
so is what him what he has explicitly
said himself.
And the videos he's put out where he's
made these comments and that he lies about,
or the different things Milk Bar has exposed
over the years. That's what I'm interested in.
Right there is just what he said alone.
Should show you this person is not what
you think he is.
That's kind of common in domestic abuse cases
where there's,
a lack of oxygen in your brain.
So your blood vessels, like, start bursting to
kind of try and get the oxygen there.
Are you seriously so offended I strangled you
a little bit? You didn't pass out. But
he kind of kept saying,
I own you. You belong to me. And
by the way, you these are tweets for
or back and forth messages from him that
he's also pulling on the screen. For example,
and I love raping you, it says, and
watching you let me watching you let me
while still debating if it's a good idea
or not.
Like, threatened to kill me. Chill the out.
Jesus Christ. I thought you were cool.
Here's another. Video from 10 years ago that
showed me
in a sexual act with 1 of my
ex girlfriends.
There's a video from 10 years ago that
showed me in a sexual act with one
of my ex girlfriends from 10 years ago.
10 years ago. Stupid
bitch. I didn't say the word list. Did
I say listen?
Hello, everyone.
I just wanted to say something about the
video that's been released recently about me and
my ex boyfriend, Andrew Tate.
Andrew is my still great friend to what
you guys saw on the video. It's just
what we used to do. It was just
pure game. He's a great guy. He would
never hurt anyone.
There's a video from 10 years ago that
showed me in a sexual act as one
of my ass girlfriend. Just what happens you
don't listen. Look at the camera.
Why are you getting hit? Why are you
getting beaten? Because I love this. You don't
you. Do as I say.
There's a video from 10 years ago that
showed me
in a sexual act with one of my
ex girlfriends. No. Just For the podcast, the
whole point is not what the woman said,
but the fact that you can prove based
on what he's saying in her own statements
and her own social media that she was
14
when that was happening. Whether or not she
was okay with it, which you can decide
whether you think that he was she was
forced to say that or not. These are
the people that you're supposed to be supporting.
Right?
If I said it was a game Did
I say it? And she said it was
a game Did I say it? Who are
other people to then comment on our lives?
It was between 2 consenting adults. We decided
to do something ourselves. We both agreed it
was fine. That's just kink shaming. Why you
getting beat? Which does it's all it is.
Well, she was 28 years old. The girl
was 14.
Funny how the right has such a sensitive
spot for that, and we all should.
Around I mean, to the point to where
you're gonna get manipulated into doing things for,
like, so the great for the the technocratic
direction simply because they tell you it has
to do with stopping pedophilia or or stop
you know, the point is that they're using
that to manipulate the right. And yet here's
an example of somebody who is literally acting
in these ways,
and yet people just ignore it because the
right tells you to.
Tucker, Candace, whatever else. They snow you with
these directions. Now look, the these are the
smallest exam what we're talking about today, this
is the smallest, least important thing. But what
the point is is to show you that
these people are the ones that are being
brought into this conversation
and many other conversations to drive thought
as some kind of thought leader. Like, if
you actually as David Icke said, if you
actually listen to this person,
jet as an objective and intelligent person, if
you listen to them speak, you will walk
away going, how does anybody think this person
even knows what they're talking about?
It's it's it's mind blowing to me, but
they're ideologues. They've been driven into these positions
and they're pretending to be thought leaders to
drive very clear partisan agendas.
He also adds this, a thread on Candace
Owens' connecting connection to Andrew Tate and her
many lies she's told to protect him. That's
what he's arguing. Candace Owens met her now
husband George Farmer in December 2018 at the
launch of Turning Point UK. 17 years later,
they got engaged over Skype. George Farmer is
the son of lord Michael Farmer, former conservative
party treasurer, a member of the lord of
House of Lords. In early 2019, Candace was
introduced to the farmer's friend, Andrew Tate, who
Farmer
has known for many many many years and
before he was famous, and this is a
quote. The night Candace,
met Tate, her Romanian assistant spent a lot
of the time talking to him. Candace's assistant
told Candace that she that night that she
believed editor Tate was a pimp.
Cut to 4 years later. And this is
a video where you can listen to him
talking about it. But, ultimately, I think it
speaks for itself. And if you really wanna
go farther back and watch his breakdown, it's
like a 10 minute long thing. I mean,
it's it's point for point showing you him
lying about what they're doing. I'm telling you,
there are people that even just a show
or even a comment about this will rapidly
defend this person or to act like I'm
somehow fighting for something else or for the
left or for whatever else
by saying these things. Despite the fact that
it's objectively provable. You can see that he's
lying about these things. If you think that
statements he made or what you just showed
or somehow you're supposed to ignore, I mean,
this is who he is. He is snowing
everybody to get this influence or rather something
else is driving that behind him. I don't
care. At the end of the day, I
care about what this will hide from you.
I care about what that conversation and we
the peep the people who could have been
in that
17,000,000
person reaching conversation or oh, that I think
that was the the Trump interview. Anyway, the
point is a massive a million person reaching
conversation about the truth of Zionism. Can you
imagine what we could've accomplished if you had
the right people in that conversation to objectively
discuss this without Tate screaming over people about
what he thinks that aren't really substance based?
I listened to some of it and it's
hard to listen to.
The truth is that we could've changed this
conversation. We could've reached people with an objective
and measured discussion about what really is going
on, but now it gets removed.
It gets tainted by people like that.
Because this, guys, this is huge. Stuff like
this. If you haven't seen this already, this
is heretz breaking down a major conversation, which
should be everywhere, if it's not though, that
we've been telling you since the very beginning.
Because it's easily provable, which is that Israel
is using human shields.
This is heretz. This is recent. This is
from 2024.
Israeli horets conversate or horets investigation.
The IDF operates Palestinian citizens as human defenders
to scan tunnels and buildings in Gaza.
Undeniable.
This is a reality. This is such this
is where we're at today. Where we can
prove from their own media that they are
using Palestinians to investigate as human shields and
just lying about it. Despite the fact that
we've got, what, 7 or 8 examples thus
far, tying people on the front of jeeps?
That that one kinda went around the world,
but yet we still pretend like it's not
happening.
It is the gaslighting like that that stops
us from being seen.
Matesem on the ground points out the Palestinian
prisoner Mohammed Saad from Jabaliyah
is being was used as a human shield.
Now, yeah, that's his testimony. You can question
it. You should. But the point is we
have an endless amount of an of, evidence
around the world.
People doctors that have come home, that have
talked about what they've seen. It's everywhere.
They fixed the camera on his body. They
pushed him into Palestinian homes. They contained they
used him for 45 days. They asked him
to check a tank attacked by a Palestinian
resistance, and then they shot him and left
him there.
He's released this was on 9th, released from
the hospital.
How many times did they see this? They
probably thought they killed him. Look at where
he was shot. In the chest.
They used him as a human shield for
45 days. They shot him in the chest,
left him on the ground.
But this is what your governments are supporting.
Mustafa Barghouti highlights another example of human shields,
Al Jazeera. TV shows
videos of the Israeli army using Palestinian civilians
as human shields, including children,
to explore tunnels, damaged buildings, and fighting areas
they're going off this investigation. But they back
it up with different videos.
So you can't hear the writing, but you
can clearly watch them do this. Are you
it's
undeniable.
I'm just jumping through it for for the
podcast time in general. But this this is
Al Jazeera that a big breakdown. There's one
you've seen, I think.
There's the one you've seen
on the front of the truck tied there.
And remember, that jeep was so hot that
it melted his skin.
That's that's the reality. Then this is after
the fact as he was after he was
released.
CUDs News Network also highlights the same conversation.
Here's more. These are all different examples from
while from since October 7th forward.
Imagine being this complicit and this willfully ignorant.
Whether you're Matt Miller, Patel, Blinken, Biden, Kamala,
Trump, RFK, doesn't matter. None of them are
gonna tell you about this because they're all
blindly supporting Israel.
An An investigation by the Israeli newspaper, Heretz,
reveals that Israeli occupation forces systematically
use Palestinian detainees as human shields.
It's part of their practice.
Thank including using Palestinians to clear tunnels and
buildings. It was conducted with approval from senior
military officers. That's important. This is not some
random rogue person in the IDF. This is
systematic,
including Israeli chief of staff,
Hersey Halevy.
You're gonna hear
Miller or Patel call them out? No. They're
gonna say, well, you could ask them about
their conduct. We are we'll stress the strategic
importance of their whatever he says every single
time. The moral and strategic imperative of lessening
human civilians. Blah blah blah. It's the same
thing every time.
Even though we could prove it's happening and
they don't care. Now October 7th Fact Check
broke this down on their own work and
said this is true. It's good that Harratz
is reporting on this. Their own work break
this down as true. And they they also
include their thread that goes over countless examples
of this happening. All these we've already shown
you. Every one of them.
Sending people walking in.
Mine was
unreal. Now before that, let me play this
again just since I haven't played it in
a while. And just just the the very
easy to prove breakdown
with source material which is included in the
actual show I'll include after this.
2013,
Palestinian
children
tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9
year old, as human shield avoid jail.
Defense for Children International, an international human rights
group. Israel forces use 5 Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 2023.
2 this is from 2017. Generally, human shields.
Since the beginning of the occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip as human shields. Israeli soldiers routinely
used Palestinian civilians as human shields by forcing
them to carry out life threatening tasks. It
was also following a high court petition
against this practice,
which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May 2002
that the IDF issued a general order
prohibiting the use of Palestinians as a means
of human shield against gunfire or attacks by
the Palestinian side. But then it goes on
to say, following the order, the use of
human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms of the army did not
construe as a human shield the use of
Palestinians,
provided they consented.
The army continued the widespread use of this
practice, which they referred to as the neighbor
procedure.
Following another petition filed by human rights organizations,
the high court of justice ruled that this
practice too violated international humanitarian law, and that
this thus was illegal. And guess what they've
never stopped doing? Here is the Institute For
Middle East Understanding, the neighbor procedure, Israel's use
of Palestinian human shields from 2012.
Human Rights Watch. During military operations, Israeli soldiers
routinely coerced Palestinian civilians, including children, to perform
life endangering acts that assisted military operations. The
practice known as the neighbor procedure. Now see
this
on and on and on. Everything's like this.
Every one of these conversations. There is decades
of UN documents that human rights groups break
down. But they've just been ignored because people
were terrified to be called racist.
Now include this show where we talk about
there's one of the clear examples too.
The open secret of Israel's use of human
shields. Broke this down countless times. Now here
is an exchange with Sayed Erekat. Now sorry
to I have a few of these, so
I'm sorry to make you have to watch
this idiot. But here he is trying to
defend, I guess, or just side step off
the skate, gaslight about everything that's going on.
And the second half is about the human
shield. The first part include as well.
And you're saying that Israel is right to
defend itself. We're talking about $20,000,000,000
on top of 3 point $5,000,000,000
last week or the week before. That's, you
know, paid for by American taxpayers,
and that's larger than many, many countries, maybe
70% of all countries in the world. I
don't know. I'm not an expert. To be
used against
defenseless people. Can't you tell the Israelis that
they should not, not lower down
the amount of damage, but they should not
be bombing the places like Tabain School
or Andhra School or Hospitals and so on.
Can you tell them that you must not
use every engagement side. In every engagement side,
we stress the importance and the strategic and
moral imperative our partners in Israel have to
minimize impacts,
on civilians and Every single time. That's one
That's the one he says literally every time
we stress the moral strategic impact of sub
lessening, civilian gas.
Again, it it's it's it's the kind of
thing that I I don't know how these
people keep their cool in here.
I mean, obviously,
it's been 10 months,
and there's not a person with a brain
in the world that could argue that they're
that they're I mean, they're killing children. They're
killing and starving and murdering and raping and
pillaging. I mean, it's crazy.
And yet he can stand here after 10
months and say every time they're asked, well,
we stress the moral and strategic imperative. Well,
then they don't care, man.
Maybe maybe 11 months of them not listening
to you will make you like, the point
is he knows that. They all know that.
This is them showing you, proving to you
that they don't care. That's what this is.
Or at the least that his superiors are
telling you you're not supposed to care, that
you need to put dissuade them from looking
even though they know that you know, we
all see, just tell them something to stop
them from asking questions.
We'll raise the issue.
We'll talk. It's it's just so
I don't even know what the it's I
can't there should be a specific word for
what this is. You know, where you can
tell that they know they're lying.
And yet we all just go through the
dance. There there should be a word created
just for that. Let me know in the
chat. Minimize civilian casualties. That being said, Israel
absolutely has every right to defend itself. It
has every right to hold to account the
terrorist actors of Hamas that undertook the horrific
October 7th. Right. And by saying that, what
he means is so there it's justified, though.
Right? So, yeah, we have we've raised the
issue, but yeah. But but bad guys. You
know? So
that's that's the only thing he does. And
so it doesn't matter that they're using human
shields or that they're raping prisoners or that
you can prove that they killed a 100
people for someone they weren't even sure was
there. But, you know, they gotta go after
terrorism. Right? I mean, really, that stems from
this absurd reality that the United States government
has been just doing the same thing everywhere
in the world for decades now. So, clearly,
they have an interest in maintaining the illusion
that fighting terrorism means you can just break
the law when you want to as long
as you scream freedom when you do it.
Terrorist attack,
and Israel has also every right to,
defend itself from other, malign actors. Right. 11
months of defending yourself. That's what these that's
what it's been, 11 months.
We're still defending ourselves against October 7th. Right?
No. But they conflate this with with missiles
rather rockets or missiles being lobbed from Lebanon
even though Lebanon's illegally occupied so they have
right to arm resistance. Or from Syria, even
though Syria is occupied so they have a
right to legal arm resistance. Or, you know,
on and on and on. But they love
to make that case.
The only reason any of this is happening
is because of what they're doing in Palestine.
So the game of playing your saying you're
defending yourself. Okay. What about Iran?
You bomb into the Iranian capital. There's no
evidence of Iran bombing you directly. You can
claim from out other con tangential parties. But
you can't claim Iran attacked Israel. Right? At
least not in this
post October 7th dynamic.
So you bomb into the capital of Iran,
and then they go, well, you can't fight
back because that would be an instigation.
So I guess defense only works when Israel
is acting. Anywhere. Ever.
This is the kind of thing that's insulting
to anyone's intelligence.
Everyone everywhere can see that that's not consistent.
They don't care.
In the region, whether it be Iran, whether
it be Hezbollah or the Houthis or otherwise.
Does Israel have a right to use Palestinians
as human shield as was reported?
And and and
I forget what he says here, but I'm
gonna guess that it's well, I haven't seen
the direct exact report. Now I have to
wait for the backup or that I'll let
Israel investigate and we'll let them speak to
it even though they already did and they
said it doesn't matter. Something like that. Are
you aware of that report? I've seen that
report. I've seen that report. Do you have
any comment on that report? There any way
for you to confirm it?
I I've seen that report, Syed.
They are incredibly these reports,
they are disturbing,
and we would urge Israel to immediately
and, transparently investigate. Investigate themselves. Okay. Choice number
2. I actually forgot, to be honest. So
there you go. I mean, it's funny how
and I have I have seen it before.
So my point though is that anyone you
see watching new, I'm willing to bet you
anything. You can get one of these four
choices and every single time, you'll get it
somewhat right. Because they don't have an answer
to any of this. It's become lazy recycling
of these same 4 different answers.
Clearly,
they are the ones doing it. Even their
own media highlighted this. And there are I
mean, again, it goes back decades where you
can prove this. So now it's coming out
really mainstream.
And your solution, your answer is to let
the person doing it investigate. Realize the main
point of the article was that it's systematic.
They're being ordered from the chief of staff,
the chief of mill,
with the from I think it was chief
of staff I read back there or is
the chief of anyway, a military leader.
And his answer is that they should investigate
whether they're doing that, whether the guy ordering
it is doing it or not.
That's just simply stupid. These allegations and hold
any, potential perpetrators accountable.
Israel has a responsibility to,
comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law,
but I also just wanna stress, Said, that
they are, just reports at this point, and
that is why,
we would encourage Israel. Right. So it's only
reports until Israel tells us whether or not
we're supposed to think they're real.
There's no other way to read that. They
need to investigate and then we'll adhere to
what they tell us and they're only reports
at this point. Reports from the leading Israeli
newspaper that broke this down with multiple people
in long term investigation and, you know, the
objective reality of the neighbor procedure or that
the UN has called it out or Human
Rights Watch has called it out or amissies
called it out or Besselem has called it
out. But, you know, they're just reports.
Just decades decades of long term observation evidence
and, you know, just reports.
You think he doesn't know that? Like, this
is why they seem like they're so out
of sorts because this is crazy. I I'd
be willing to say unprecedented.
They're always lying and and gaslighting, obfuscating. Always.
But think about how crazy this is. What
this shows you is what we were showing
you to begin with today. Don't forget the
part we started with. That's what this looks
like. The UK you might as well be
able to see the strings attached to his
shoulders. It's unreal how obvious that is.
Now
the go this this next part of this
is really kind of continuing into
the conversation of the overlap of
the kind of international community discussion, but going
into what they're actually failing to do and
then actually doing. In regard to the lie
of the Tuesday solution, the lie of the
supposed ceasefire,
and then, you know, what they're actually doing
around the genocide.
So first, as I've said since the beginning,
really since before October 7th,
but really I've stressed this idea that, you
know, like I've said it many times, that
there's terrorism. People that commit violence just because
they want to or for a political end,
There are bad people out there. I've always
argued that it
it's far worse
to do those things, to murder children, to
kill somebody because you want to over political
reasons, and then either lie about it
or say, and I didn't do that, or
go as far as to say, no. No.
No. It's a good thing.
This is what we should be doing. I
want praise for doing terrorism, but they don't
say it like that. So my point is
that is that is far worse than terrorism.
Because terrorists are out there going, god. I
killed them, and they deserve to die because
of my political belief. And that's disgusting. But
the ones that go out there and do
it and want you to praise them for
being that because they're trying to manipulate you,
there's something especially evil about that. And that's
what we're discussing here.
As I wrote, as I've long said, Israel
is not just committing genocide, but they're asking
for you to praise them for doing so.
That's the whole new level of evil. And
from the beginning of this, that's one of
the things that really was so disconcerting. Maybe
one of the reasons people woke up to
this so fast. That not only were they
saying, yes, genocide is or rather, you know,
not not only they're just high denying genocide.
They are coming at this from the point
of, no, no, this is justified. This is
Israel defending themselves. This is what it looks
like to fight terrorism.
None of those are true. I mean, it's
just objectively on his face. Everyone can see
this at this point. They've lost control of
this. But yet, they still double down, triple
down, keep pushing.
They are the strings.
Undeniable.
So this video
is of the outgoing
this guy just this mongoloid of a man.
This guy just such a clumsy unintelligent person
that is on the way out of the
UN and is just kinda stomping his feet
and really childish way on the way out.
But this is what he says on the
way out.
It's it's pretty it's embarrassing.
Though who knows? Perhaps another session will be
called because of more terrorist propaganda.
I would like to leave you with this.
I have been
immensely,
immensely
proud to represent my country here, the most
moral country in the world. The most moral
country in the world. You listen, Palestinian
representative.
Now what's funny about that, there's not, like,
some kind of rule, but there's a there's
kinda like there's there's a very common decorum.
It's almost like the 3rd wall. Like, you're
not supposed that's very unusual
to to to directly be like, you,
Palestinian
guy right there. Like, it's just this guy
these are people that are not.
I've I've got what I've said in the
past is that what you're seeing in the
it's the best way I can find describe
this.
People that have are in power that haven't
really earned that power through surreptitious action. Like,
you every one of these people, you watch
them stand up, and the radical ones in
in the Knesset. What else? They're just very
childish. They're very small.
I mean, like, in the sense of, like,
who they are as a person.
Lashing out in there talking, you know, literally,
like, no decorum,
saying that children deserve to be murdered. Oh,
it's okay to rape everybody. Like, these are
just some crazy people.
And the way he's acting right here just
shows a lack of decorum and is a
very childish way to leave.
I just think that shows you what these
people are have gained a lot of power
when they don't deserve it. I think that's
the best way to put it. But, you
know, there's a lot of kinda different ways
you could overlap that. But here he is
gonna, you, did you hear that?
Like, it just it's disjointing. It's like, you
know what? You could make your statements without
to me, it shows a level of insecurity.
Right? That you're know that you're being exposed,
I think that everyone can see that, And
you're on your way out trying to make
some big statement about how we're the right
ones.
You know, it's like, I'm eyeball. I'm going
home. That's the sense I get from this.
Moral country in the world. You listen? Palestinian
representative.
Right. And because, you know, the most moral
country in the world. Really? I mean, we
just got done highlighting your debate over whether
you should be able to rape prisoners seemingly
leaning into the majority saying yes. And we're
gonna pretend that that's the most moral? I
mean, you could make a lot of other
claims, but most moral is just it's the
thing we've been seeing from the beginning. It's
like the screaming that you are the thing
that's the opposite of we're the most moral.
Like, it's it's like the or reflective reactive
propaganda we keep seeing. This just seems to
be how they've conducted. I don't know how
they ever got this influence. But the point
is,
a negative thing will happen and they, like,
fall over themselves to make some flimsy narrative
that completely, in 3 days later, implodes because
they didn't think it through, and it's all
reactive.
So it's the same kind of thing. Instead
of going, no, we're not doing those bad
things, you go all the way over the
top and say, we're the most moral over
all of you. It's like, well, don't you
think that's gonna mildly insult your allies too?
It's just it's just this is I you
know, I I'm not gonna explain it well
enough. That
screams somebody that doesn't even understand what it's
like to be in these positions.
In this warped place.
I think right there, the Palestinian leader was
pointing out, I think that everybody like, nobody
here believes you. I hope one day
you will also see the bias and perversion
of morality here and pray, and I pray
that you will see the truth.
The terrorist organization
that this guy represents here and tyrannical
regimes
should be condemned,
not protected.
Except the ones that they support and that
they are, specifically.
Right? Like, obviously, we don't want to condemn
the Saudi Arabian conversation. We don't want to
condemn the groups that you're funding working with
or the genocides that you funded and allowed
to happen over the years, not talking about
the current one.
Right? We only wanna go after the ones
that we name those things and usually aren't
even remotely that. And that Israel
should be praised.
See? See, but this is my point. Like,
you could have said all that without going
to that.
Right? Like, you can go as far as
to say you're wrong about us. And I
hope over time that it gets exposed
that you've that you've been lied to or
that we're not the what you think we
but to go as far as not just
that you should know that we're being lied
about, but that you should be praising us.
That's my point. That is a child taking
that too far.
Praising you?
I just think it's a strange thing to
do, and I think it's a it's a
desperate move. We are today the vanguard of
civilization.
Wow. We are the vanguard of civilization.
But until then,
I'm Israel
Chai.
Thank you, mister president.
The vanguard of civilization?
Seriously? Representative
of Israel.
Now what you don't see there is as
he gets up and leaves, he sort of,
like, kicks his chair and leaves it like
a funny position. The other one has to
correct it. It's just like, what a child.
What an absolute it's just and this is
what I keep seeing everywhere.
So
praise us. Praise us for our genocide. If
you don't, you're racist.
Now here's what the Palestinian representative had to
say. He said, if there are no consequences,
they are not going to stop.
They're not going to listen to you. To
those who continue to arm Israel, to those
who still have the audacity to call on
Israel to investigate its own crimes as if
the actions of its soldiers do not reflect
the actual policies of its military and political
leaders, which we just proved to you. In
one of many examples,
that's a systematic
effort. They're being ordered to use human shields.
And they want them to investigate that? He
goes, to those who dare to try and
deter international courts from ensuring accountability instead of
deterring the per the per the the
per, perperator perpetrator, excuse me, of atrocities. Right?
And I guess the whole point, instead of
redirecting us to go after the people trying
to go look into that, whatever you think
their intentions are, as opposed to the actual
people murdering children in front of us, he
says wake up. How long do you have
to remain in denial?
Wake up. Stop finding excuses. Stop imagining that
you can reason with the Israeli government. So
it stops killing civilians by the 1,000, imposing
famine, torturing prisoners, colonizing and annexing our land,
Colonizing.
All while you appeal to them.
Call on them. Demand them to stop. You
have to tell them to stop,
and you have the tools to make them
stop.
It's what we need.
Because it's clear that they don't wanna stop
this.
Now, I've included this before, I just wanna
include it again so you can watch it.
It's 15 minutes long.
But as Glenn points out, one of the
world's most noble and courageous groups is Doctors
Without Borders. They send physicians around the world
to crises including wars.
This is doctor
Javed
Abdalmonium.
I believe it looks seems I probably mispronounced
that, but just returned from Gaza. It's his
7th war. He explains why he's never seen
anything like the barbarism and suffering there, which
we've seen I'll I think I'll play that
one again in a minute. The the countless
amounts of doctors who have come out and
told you exactly what they're seeing, not Palestinian
doctors from all places around the world, from
London, from, UK, ever or rather what was
the other one? Anyway, all around the world.
And yet we still pretend like it's somehow
not the reality. Now here's the crazy thing.
It's not people aren't coming around going, here's
why he's lying. He works for Palestine. He
is Hamas. He's, you know, blind
politically advantageous.
There's nothing. There's no arguments for why
they're saying what they're saying. They just disregard
them. And I'm talking, like, from corporate media,
even mainstream alternative media. Just blindly ignore what
these doctors are showing you.
Instead, here's what people look to. You know,
that want to anyway. I mean, I gotta
be honest. This has gotta be one of
the most embarrassing things I've seen this entire
conversation.
First of all, I don't even know why
Elon Levy is still pretending to be a
part of this. I mean, for I genuinely
believe that people like this person or,
as what's her name?
There's a few of them that aren't, like,
officially
working for the Israeli government on paper, but
actively clearly part of this propaganda campaign. But
think about this. This is posted August 13,
2024.
For 10 months after this, the October 7th
discussion.
The video that they claim is like the,
you know, it's like a snuff film of,
like, the the disgusting things that we now
know, a lot of which the IDF conducted.
It's already been around.
It actually let me see if this still
pops up.
Yep. Perfect.
So
this is Dilly Hassain watching talking about what
Owen Jones said. And he's gained a lot
of prominence in this conversation because he's come
from the inside mainstream who's been calling all
this out. He was invited to watch this
Israeli snuff film. It's propaganda. I mean, it's
been exposed. Most of what they're even claiming
this shows you has been proven to have
been lies.
But he he watched it on November 28th.
He talked about it. And he said that
in that video they claimed showed all these
things. It had no proof of the headed
babies, which we know by now. It has
no proof of killing children.
Hamas killing children. No proof of rape. Remember,
there's only 2 children that apparently died that
day. 1 of which was killed after the
fact and one was shot. And I argued
that was from IDF shooting. Either way, no
beheaded babies, no burned babies, no babies in
ovens, all these lies.
And he says no proof of rape in
the video they're talking about as well as
everywhere else. No proof of beheading baby humans
alive. He came out and literally listen to
the video. It's only 20 minutes long. And
he breaks it down. He says, I came
out saying I well, where's all this proof
they were talking about? And so he thought
maybe he missed something, so he calls a
US journalist that was there. He calls a
UK journalist that was there. Both of which
go, yeah. I didn't I didn't see any
of that. Except the problem is other people
came out going, it proves everything. And he
was just being honest about it.
As I as it seems to me.
So, the point is that here's Elon Levy.
Oh, and the other point was that video,
that's it's out there. It's all over the
internet. There are people people have posted this
now. So they keep acting like there's some
kind of new thing. It's the same thing
they've been producing. If you end up looking
at it, it's the same things. Same clips,
same redundant things, same lies.
So 10 months later, Elon Levy comes out
and says, Hamas' October 7th massacre was too
sadistic for words. But I watched the footage.
Again?
What what's the what are you talking about?
So after 10 months, he went back to
watch it? You're disgusting. That's disgusting.
And he goes, and I I can try
to describe it.
Never forgive, never forget, never again.
So, 10 months later, he's putting out a
video. I'm not making this up. I'll show
it to you. That is a video of
him watching the video.
Because it's too sadistic for word. The video
is public, man. It's out there. And other
people are telling you that they've watched it,
and it doesn't even remotely show what you're
saying. This is a cheap and flimsy and
lazy, if I might add, effort
to act like this is still so problematic
and watch my face react to the bad
things. It's I don't even know how you
think this is gonna have an effect. I'm
not gonna play the whole thing, but watch
how stupid this is.
I can't show them the images,
you know, that have already been posted by
everybody all over the Internet. But I can
describe what I see. That's what's happening. As
he's sitting there with his thing his thing,
you know, going on, I love thinking about
this.
October 7th.
We're starting with Hamas terrorist dead body cameras
as they flood into Israel shouting.
This is actually what it is. I mean,
am I crazy? This has gotta be the
dumbest thing I've seen from this entire conversation.
You're the whole thing is him looking at
a screen. You're looking and the film is
on his face, and he's like, oh, and
then they're coming out. And, oh, no. Bad
thing. Oh, gross and murder.
I just like, this has got to be
ridiculed.
Not only because
almost everything they claim they're proving in this
video has been proven by Israeli media, admitted
by IDF members, by people, Jewish Israelis that
were there to be false,
proving that Zaca and the rest of them
blatantly lied. The UN investigation that they pretend
it proved everything later came out to say,
no. We didn't prove anything. In fact, we've
shown that most of what they said was
false, or we didn't even allow blame that
we were just it's unreal
what they're doing. And this is the best
he can
do. This guy standing here acting like him
watching this is gonna change your mind. Maybe
it will for some people, but that is
a desperate effort. So after everything we're going
through, the best you're gonna get is this
completely ridiculous person giving you facial expressions about
what he wants you to think is supposed
to be everything.
I mean, that just that is the dumbest
thing I've ever seen.
I mean, I guess if you're that desperate,
right? I mean, you might as well try.
Now here
is an Israeli
speaking about what we should be allowing now
in Gaza.
The reality of what they're actually saying. Well,
he wants you to think this video that
is lie after lie after lie. We now
know a lot of which was shot or
killed or done by the IDF.
They just don't want or in the Hannibal
directive going forward and everything else we talked
about.
They want you to believe that's the atrocity
and nothing else matters. All defense from this
one day despite most of it now being
shown as lies. This is what you need
to understand. As Adam writes, the woman there
is an enemy. The baby there is an
enemy. And the 1st grader is an enemy.
As he writes, peace was never an option
with these demons. Now I would not the
point is that you can use terms you
wanna describe people with. I frankly, anybody that
thinks like this might as well be called
a demon. It's absolutely horrific to have anybody
that would pretend a baby is an enemy
because what they, you know, what they might
become.
This is a disgusting and terrible person. It's
the same kind of person that would rationalize
rape because they're bad people.
Now this this video is what a majority
of Israel clearly thinks as we've been shown
countless times over. But important to note, not
everybody. Not every Israeli, not every Jew. Clearly,
a lot of people push back on this.
But we have to understand how real this
is.
He says Hamas does not control Gaza, and
it's not the enemy.
Gaza contains Hamas.
No. Hamas. Hamas is not the enemy here,
he says. But Gaza
is the enemy.
So all he's doing is making it out
to build the entirety of the area, even
though we can prove to you that they
are the one that made sure Hamas would
be in power. Right?
He says as soon as we alter the
terminology,
the understanding
of the situation will also change.
And the definition of the enemy will be
different.
The way that way, it is not important
who you warn.
Or who evacuates a neighborhood. So in other
words, that's what they're doing. You understand?
He's outlining
what they're doing.
Well, if we just say they're all terrorists,
well, it doesn't matter if we warn. They
want the western world to think they're doing
that. Even though we can prove to you
every time this happens, they're bombing every location,
where they are, where they're going, where they're
where they're going next. There are no safe
locations according to literally anybody other than Israeli
and US entities.
And he's simply going, well, no neighborhood needs
to be evacuated. We don't need to warn
anybody. Despite the fact that, yeah, though, you
already would even if they were everyone there,
Hamas member.
That's the fact. That's international law. They've been
breaking it from the very beginning.
Just because you are Hamas member does not
mean you're acting in military capacity.
This is the this is the idea of
them murdering them sleeping in their homes. As
Robert's broken down, whether they're a foreign entity
or not, or rather you know, whatever context,
the US war or him, Israel war against
Hamas,
there is a there's a a a structure
to the way the law is supposed to
work. Murdering their families or killing them when
they're not conducting warfare against you, those are
crimes.
But it doesn't matter because they do what
they want. They just use the law against
their enemies.
He says, this is what is called flattening
the area. Again, we've already heard them say
this, flatten the area, turn into a parking
lot. He's telling you that's what those terms
mean.
Leveling the ground. That's what we've heard too.
He says, you asked me what I would
do.
And the answer is simply leveling the ground
and to kill the largest number possible.
Some Israeli platform is taught.
Because the woman is an enemy.
A baby is an enemy.
The first grader is an enemy.
And the pregnant woman
is an enemy.
Because we see it with our eyes.
Why then can we not absorb western values?
Because they blur basic logic.
So all these people screaming, we've got similar
values.
Clearly not.
Or at the very least, clearly not with
American, you know, you individuals.
The government lies about what they really are.
They're clearly in line with Israel. But the
truth is that this is what they're actually
all embodying.
Do we watch them murdering children or watching
them traffic children, watching them kill I mean,
everything you could possibly list off, we've already
watched this happen. We just went over Human
Shield. We've talked about Oregon Oregon harvesting.
These people are pure evil.
Your governments are arming them.
It's just because we see
a boy carrying
chocolate in his hand
yet the same boy will learn how to
use a koleshnikoff.
Well, by that logic, you could do this
literally anywhere.
It doesn't matter that he just wants to
make it out to the case that every
child will become a terrorist because that's what
the I mean, that's what used to be
kind of the tactic.
The,
the the example I always use is Lumer
in interviewing with George Galloway where she he
made her look like the fool that she
is. She she went on and make the
argument. Everyone's a terrorist. There are the the
the baby born yesterday is a terrorist.
It that no. That means you're a disgusting
human being that can't grasp simple realities.
Clearly, this is where it's stemming from. Where
do you think that happens? She these people
are assets of the Israeli government as far
as I'm concerned, whether they know it or
not.
He's a terrorist, although he is a boy.
I mean, I don't even need to explain
this.
If you think that that may even if
this person let's just even put it this
way. Let's say every child was later groomed
to be that, it would still be a
crime.
If you think that's not the case, then
you are a bad person. At the end
of the day, we also know it's not
true.
The reality is undeniable
that we can see why this is all
happening.
If you if we I mean, the the
bottom line is let's not forget the group
they're pointing to is the group that they
put into power.
So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
Yeah. Sure. He deliberately and systematically
even even told this on record whoever wants
to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So And the former
leader of Shin Bet goes on to say
that they gave him $1,400,000,000
to do so. We'll play a couple more
clips in a separate thing in a second.
But just realizing that as they're literally trying
to tell you
that they're the reason that they're all the
enemy, well, then you need to include the
fact that Israel funded and put them into
power.
Now, Vandant Patel,
on August 13th, writes, the United States government
stands firmly against Israeli minister of natural security
Ben Gavir's visit
to the temple mount today. This is on
13th, which demonstrated blatant disregard for the historic
status quo with respect to the holy site.
Oh, you mean the thing he does, like,
every other weekend?
Funny how you only suddenly now care about
that. This is a desperate attempt to make
it look like they care or are holding
them accountable.
I responded by saying, oh, now okay. Now
do all the murder, rape, and starvation. Go.
I said this was a weak effort to
appear as if you are critical of Israel.
We see you. And this person responds with
some disgusting
meme, graph AI graphic about
Palestinians being shocked when they fight back. And
I responded, which he didn't respond to because
there is no argument here. I said, we
all know
we know all you have is deflection and
distractions as the world sees exactly what you
are, but you could at least put some
effort into it. This is just, you know,
the look you make when the country attacked
is fighting back.
And I said,
alright, I I just wanna play this clip.
So we could play this one and bring
this into
a couple different points.
Here is what Well, you know what? I
think actually this might be a better one
to play in a second.
Move it over here. I'll come back to
it. Either way, it's it's just one of
the doctors. I wanna play a couple of,
but I wanna do it all right now.
But the point here is, it's where he
is just going, we care about him walking
into the mosque, which it is, not a
synagogue. And they always burst in and make
them all in, you know, it's it's just
disgusting how they violate this all the time.
But, yeah, how about the rape and the
starvation and the murder? What about all that?
Well, let's talk about that.
Since here, we just talked about the rape
conversation, right, where they're debating about whether and
clearly confirming that it is okay to rape
prisoners.
Here's a smaller example, Harratz just broke down.
Probe reopened into an Israeli lawmaker who allegedly
helped squelch father's sexual assault case.
It's not a secret, guys. There's a big
problem there.
That's because of what's allowed. But here we
have another example of him ordering investigations,
right, this was they're ordered to be reopened,
but using their power to stop an investigation
around rape.
Because that's what we're talking about. After Haret's
report brought a light to, to light sexual
abuse at this yeshiva,
the police recommended charging an elder, Tesla, with
a with rape and sexual abuse of his
students.
The case is now under review. But the
point is, this powerful lawmaker got that removed.
So he could make it about not caring
about rape, which clearly seems to be a
thing, or just using his power to get
what he wants. Nothing new there. Make sure
you understand who we're dealing with here. And
what they're hiding from you, by the way,
is this horrifying reality. Make sure you didn't
miss the but but seldom report called Welcome
to Hell. Robert broke this down in a
horrifying reality. Israel's horrifying mass rape and torture
campaign against Palestinians.
Important for you to read. Here's the best
selling report. So it's I mean, if you
wanna stay up for the rest of your
life and never sleep again, this is what
you should read.
Here's,
Amnesty International from 1991.
Rape and sexual abuse, torture and ill treatment
of women in detention. Israel.
Here is Wyatt Reid.
I can't God, you know, I can't even
watch this. I don't know why this bothers
me more than just about anything, but this
is what we're dealing with. So as we're
talking about not just raping and murdering and
we're talking about how Israelis as the guy
said at the start of the segment. Killing
all of them, they're all the enemy. What
did
Netanyahu
and Glantz and plenty of others say, routinely,
like Amalek.
A biblical reference to destroying, as he just
said, leveling the ground. That's what this talks
about. Not a stone on a stone, all
these biblical prophecies
and passages.
But one of the things about Amalek is
destroying not just the people, but all their
animals, everything.
This has been a chant. They have songs
they're singing about Amalek.
Now I'm only gonna play this once because
I literally can't even stomach this anymore.
They there's a person filling out their window
and it is a donkey cart because they've
taken everything, they've ripped up all the roads
so they can't even move along if they
have a car
with flour and food,
and they just randomly shoot the the donkey
for no reason because they are disgusting people.
And that's what he quotes.
Now go and attack Amalek and utterly destroy
all that they have and do not spare
them. But kill both man and woman infant
and nursing child ox and sheep camel and
donkey.
That's makes me sick.
How animals are suffering for no reason.
Now, the reality is, this is across the
entire area. I recently pointed this out but
I wanna say it again. Muhammad Shehada points
out, this is a better graph actually, more
specific about how the intensity.
But realizing that the overall picture, I think
I probably have it still somewhere floating around,
is is it just shocking?
Showing you the amount of areas that have
been bombed.
I mean, it's it's easily 90% of the
entire area. There's really no question. And there's
no way an honest person can pretend that
that is somehow in line with pinpoint targeting
of only Hamas members or whatever other nonsense
we're getting told.
I'm not seeing it pop up, but you
guys remember the the report. Here's a there's
a picture of it. He says, Israel is
setting the gold standard for urban warfare. That's
what we keep getting told. Right? Netanyahu.
Shove this graph in the face of shameless
genocide deniers, he says. By June, Israel had
dropped over 70,000
tons of bombs on Gaza Strip, which we've
said before, exceeding World War 2 bombings in
Dresden, Hamburg, London, combined.
Combined.
Look at this graph.
And they just keep bouncing them around like
a pinball machine. And this is what this
person actually says. This graph provides solid evidence
in support of Netanyahu's thesis. Israel's achieved an
amazing record of avoiding civilian casualties. I mean,
it's probably just another bot in the whole
field of bots on Twitter. Half the internet
today, probably 90% of Twitter as far as
I can tell. Point.
How do you possibly say that? And be
honest. They're either lying or they're just reflexively
post posting propaganda.
Here is what's actually happened. As he writes,
a vision of hell, insane levels of destruction
in Northern Gaza. This isn't simply the result
of Israel's fight against Hamas. It is punitive,
medieval style raid against populations of more than
2,000,000. He can how can any decent human
being support this? Just look at the look
at that.
There's so many videos like this just completely
destroyed.
Everything.
Now
I wanna talk about the deals.
I wanna talk about the 2 state solution
and settlers.
Now this is very frustrating because of how
long this has been going on.
I can't just I just it's like people
like Michael Rapaport here, it's it's such an
insulting thing to even pretend like these people
have a place in this conversation.
They're just I mean,
somebody who has exposed themselves as being so
blindly a hypocritical. Like, even showing hot hypocrisy
around things that he stood on in the
past. Like, for example, by the way. He's
a he's a lefty
out there screaming about bad Trump and he's
a complete
anti Trump person. And here he is talking
about this guy. And he starts by saying,
this dumb ape just turned down another ceasefire,
which by the way is not even what
happened. It's the I mean, how many times
do we have to go through this childish
punk dynamic? Let's not forget that Michael Rapoport
has already made it clear that he's blindly
adherent to Israel narratives. He doesn't care. He's
fighting for that because even if it's true,
it doesn't matter or false.
But doesn't it seem like like, imagine if
this was something about somebody else.
He would freak out about racism, but, of
course, it doesn't matter because you're allowed to
be racist against Palestinians
in this conversation.
But this is just ongoing lies.
So here he is speaking with CNN.
The reality is the same. And we're gonna
go over this. It's, it never ends. How
many times we've gone over this? Roberts have
been writing about this for a while. Hamas
agrees to cease fire. Israel attacks Rafa in
response.
Israel once again refuses its own cease fire
deal after Hamas accepts. It is the same
thing.
What they're saying today?
Blinken says Israel's okay with the plan. Now,
Hamas has to do the same. But guess
what?
Every single platform the world around, even remotely
mainstream or mainstream adjacent has the identical same
headline. Blinken says, did you accept? That has
to stand out to you. But here's the
point.
Go back before
August
2024.
Well, guess what? Oh, my god. Look at
all the times that's been said. Blinken urges
Hamas to accept the one Israel accept. That's
June 11th. Here's April 29th.
But Blinken urges Hamas to accept new Israel
terms.
Every single time it's not it ends up
the opposite. Every single time it turns out
Israel has lied. Israel has put new things
on the table. Hamas already accepted. They refused
it after they did every time. But you
realize how insulting it is to our intelligence
that we just keep playing this game where
they go, oh, look. They accept. They turn
it down. Here we go again.
It's it's in it's it's nauseating.
We'll go back to it. Here's what Jim
was posting about him speaking with CNN. So
this is the official Hamas representative, which again,
let's remember, this was a group that was
funded by Israel, that was put in position
by Israel. That doesn't mean that everybody involved
to this day, which a long time since
2,006,
are what they were.
But I don't think we should ignore that
very alarming overlap and what that means in
regard to I the way I simply put
it is that I'm pretty certain that the
people in charge that they keep in comfortable
hotel rooms that are are palaces in Qatar.
Right? Right now that's what's happening. The leaders
are kept separate and Israel said on the
record at the beginning, we're not gonna go
after them. And the cutter is literally part
of the negotiations. Like, it's kinda dumb that
we have to pretend that's out there.
So you can decide for yourself. I don't
think anybody knows for sure what level of
influence, but I believe that there is influence.
So keep that in mind. Here's what he's
saying back and forth with CNN.
I am joined by Osama Hamdan. He is
a senior member of Hamas. He joins me
now from Doha in Qatar. Oh, and don't
forget. They literally just assassinated the leader
who was leading the negotiations.
So maybe that would within the interest of
making sure this guy would be there. I
don't know.
Thank you for taking the time.
Thank you.
Let me begin here. We're 10 months into
this war.
Gaza Health Ministry officials say that 40,000
Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, have been
killed.
On October 7th,
Hamas killed 100 of Israeli civilians.
Does Hamas It that's interesting.
That's more accurate than I've seen any of
them do. 100 of civilians. So you cannot
take that that the out of the 1200
number, they keep floating, which is all inaccurate
no matter how you cut it.
But ultimately, he's saying either that that means
that IDF did in Feb, which we already
know, by the way, kill a lot of
those people,
more the majority,
or he's now including in that conversation that
most of them, which they were, were not
civilians.
That's pretty crazy to me right there. I
just I'm I'm barely following along with what
their narratives are at this point. At the
end of the day,
think about how much that shifted. At the
beginning, it was 1200 civilians.
No. Most of them were killed, I think,
by the IDF members, and most of them
were civil were not civilians. They were official
settlers with official capacity and armed, or they
were police, or they were military. That's the
whole point of the armed resistance. So I
find that interesting. Anyway, let's keep listening. Today,
regret
the October 7th terror attacks?
Well, it seems to me that you are
giving the Israelis the right to kill the
Palestinians. When you ask if we are if
we if we feel regret for what Israel
has done. I mean, it's a good think
think about where you started. Do you regret
the act?
Like, say you're gonna you know, I mean,
you're not talking to Israel, so clearly you're
talking to the person. But it's an interesting
thing to frame it as. I mean, it
really does have to start with the idea
that what they did was wrong. Now let's
remember, regardless of what acts and I'll add
to it all the new information about who
actually did what and the absolute level of,
you know, if who knows at this point?
How many I mean, I think we don't
I think we can't prove
it's certainly possible that some of the worst
things, whether or not it was shot by
were done by the IDF members. We know
that a lot of them were killed by
them because they were ordered to, not just
because of what they thought, but an actual
order for Hannibal Directive. It's been proven now.
My point is with all this muddied information,
it's we I don't think we really know.
But on top of that, the idea is
that the regardless, I still my point is,
like, with the Bebas family or whatever else,
we know that they committed crimes. Nobody can
deny otherwise.
They took people that were civilians and children.
Those are it's a crime. It's a war
crime. It should be charged. But
not even but, period. But then the point
is on top of that, the act in
itself before all that, as I've said many
times, was, no matter what you think about
it, just because your personal opinions doesn't change
the facts, a legal act of armed resistance.
Palestine is occupied by everyone with any standing
in the conversation,
Which means they have a legal right, whether
or not they were attacked, to fight the
military occupation.
So when they were civilians attacked, well, that
would be a crime that should be dealt
with. But the act itself is not then
invalidated.
So it's funny that they start there.
You have to understand that Israel has been
killing the Palestinians for the last 76 years.
Yep. And when the Palestinians react against the
occupation who failed the Palestinians, who failed also
agreement,
who continue,
undermining all the peace process and trying to
take over all the Palestinian lands,
talking in public about kicking out 2,000,000 Palestinians
from West Bank to, East Jordan.
All this is the right for Israel. And
when the Palestinians react against the occupation,
they have to regret to what the Israelis
are doing, killing them by thousands.
That's the Palestinians where the I am was
killing.
I've been coming to this part of the
world for more than 20 years, and I
have personally Yeah. Covered terror attacks by Hamas
that killed Israeli civilians
more than 20 years. Think about the response
there.
Like, it's so obvious this guy has an
agenda, and that's why no matter what they
say or what they add or now they
suddenly, in an opportunistic way, start saying the
truth, these people are not on your side.
Like, I mean, think about that response that
you so wait. Of of course, you have.
But what he just said was that 76
years of this ongoing attack, but he can't
engage with that. He's I've honestly, I think
these people are given, like, a very limited
scope of the level of truth they can
start getting to maybe win back some support.
So I'm asking you this, just looking at
the last 10 months of this conflict for
a moment.
Does does Hamas
accept any responsibility
for the deaths of
Palestinian civilians in Gaza? Because as you know,
Hamas tunnels, Hamas military units Wow. Are based
under and around homes,
mosques, schools in Gaza.
Do you accept responsibility
for any of the deaths in Gaza?
Yeah.
Unfortunately,
you have covered this region for 20 years,
but you were watching you was watching the
region by the Israeli eyes. Right. You didn't
saw the Israelis killing thousands of Palestinians within
those 20 years. In 22,014,
Israel attacked Gaza, and they killed more than
4,000 Palestinians. We didn't see that. They attacked
Gaza and they killed in one day 1,000
Palestinian in 2,008, and you didn't see that.
Those attacks Actually, I was here I was
here in 2014.
I was here in 2014, and I was
here in 2008. I I'm I'm asking you
if if Hamas accepts
It's true. I do. But but what you're
saying is factually not true. I I was
here for both. Yeah. But you didn't report
on it, moron. That's what he's saying. I
was here for both of those conflicts.
My question is, does Hamas accept any responsibility
for the deaths of its own people in
in Gaza? Answer.
You can't excuse me. You can't ask and
answer by yourself.
Either ask me to answer or you can
finish that talking by yourself to yourself.
If you wish that, it's okay.
I'm done. I have to answer, and I
want to say what I want to say.
It's not your duty to dictate
what I'm supposed to say. It's not your
duty to receive the answers you wish to
receive. So the question is, do you accept
responsibility
for the deaths
of civilians in in Gaza? That's the question.
You will will come you still keep watching
what is happening by the Israeli eyes, listening
by the Israeli ears,
acting as if you are part of Israeli
military attack against the Palestinians.
It seems that you support the killing of
40,000
Palestinians.
You are not blaming the Israelis for anything.
You are talking
about Palestinians who are being killed as if
they were nothing, and you are just saying
that the Palestinians were killing the Israelis. Let's
go to West Bank. There is no Hamas.
There is no action from Hamas, and the
Israelis have killed already 800 Palestinians in the
last 10 months. Sure. What about this? They
are talking about the Palestinian In fact, sir,
in fact, sir, as you know, CNN is
CNN has covered the deaths of Palestinians quite
closely.
That's that's a complete lie. You But let
let me ask you a question here because
you're saying I would have tried it, unfortunately.
You are you are not So I'm gonna
quote you I'm gonna quote you right now.
A Palestinian.
You didn't show the women who are being
I'm gonna quote you right now a Palestinian
in Gaza.
Yeah. We are talking about 16,000
children who are being killed by the Israeli,
and you are asking if the resistance is
responsible for very aware Yeah. He's trying to
answer the question as you can tell, but
the point he doesn't want to get the
who wants it's the same thing he said.
Now I'm not supporting either side here, just
to be very clear. I'm very skeptical of
him quite honest because of what I said
in the beginning. Doesn't mean he's saying things
that are incorrect. What's funny about this is
that what think about the question. Do you
take responsibility for the people that Israel has
killed
because of the narrative that he spun out
afterward? Realizing on the record, on the surface,
that a lot, if not most of these
tunnels that we've already talked about
have been allowed, if not built, by Israel,
including the primary example of Sheba Hospital.
I I mean, we broke that down right
when it happened damn near before anybody. Not
not not necessarily that it already talked about
before October 7th, but in the midst of
this, we realized in the research that it
was clear that Israel and then even,
Ehud Barak said it on the record with
CNN, and she was baffled by it. She's
like, what did you say?
They built the command center under the hospital
while it was an active hospital.
Talk about human shields. But the point is
that whether that was continued to be used
or not, we can't tell. Basically, it turned
out that not because they didn't show you
anything, if it even existed at all. My
point though is that there's a lot of
those that were built by Israel,
and I guarantee they're used by Hamas. But
on top of that, as I've shown you
many times, you can prove that there was
a system where they were allowing the smuggling
to benefit from it, to maintain their occupation,
to justify what they think the Palestinians are.
That's what their game has been. That's why
they funded Hamas. To say, See? That's what
they are. That's what they do.
So the game of pretending like, because Israel
says these tunnels are everywhere they bomb, don't
you feel responsible?
Have you seen evidence of that? I'm not
denying these are tunnels. But realize,
have you seen evidence
for 95% of Gaza that there are tunnels
over every home, under every school?
Most of them are not the case. You
can prove this. They're bombing schools and mosques
and hospitals because they're murdering people.
And his answer, based on the assumption, because
of what Israel told him, is or his
question is, don't you feel responsible or should
you or do you? It's an insulting question.
It really is. I'm
very aware of the civilian toll in in
Gaza.
Absolutely. You are not listening, and you are
not allowing me to answer. I You don't
want to listen to the facts. You just
want to listen to yourself. It's okay. That's
enough. It's fine. No. I I'm I'm gonna
quote you now I'm gonna quote you now
a Palestinian from Gaza.
You want to hear to yourself.
You just want to listen to yourself and
to the Israelis. If you are aware and
what it the
Israelis, don't talk to Hamas. Thank you very
much. The Israelis have killed us, and you
are We've invited you on the air to
to ask you questions. No. In a responsible
position for the killing of the Palestinians.
You are supporting the killing of the Palestinians.
I'm sorry to hear that from the CNN.
Thank you very much. I have to finish
that. Thanks.
Let let me ask you. I'm gonna quote
you someone from Gaza who spoke well.
There you go. It's a shame we did
give him the opportunity to answer questions.
I love that after reframing. Right. Well, he
didn't say exactly what I wanted to hear,
and I wouldn't let him speak if he
didn't otherwise. So, too bad that didn't work
out.
Pretty sad. But either way, you can decide
for yourself on that. I think what's interesting
though
is back to the d. This guy refused
another ceasefire deal.
Clumsy Michael Rapaport saying the narrative Israel told
him to say, here's Caroline Glick. This is
so so hostile. It's heartbreaking. Here's the security
secretary of state demanding that Israel bow to
Hamas' demands for capitulation in exchange for a
small fraction of the hostages. So here's what's
fascinating to me. On one side of this,
you've got the blunt net just ignorant narrative,
like, what Michael's putting out. Well, Hamas said
no even though Israel agreed, but hold on
a second. Here's another side of the narrative
where you got blinking going, but this is
what you should agree to. Now this is
on 19th.
K? So understand that this is what this
the way this went is the same as
always. That you got Blinken and the narrative
from the US going, well, we're almost Israel's
thing is all we're basically there. And we
got them hope Hamas comes along with it.
But from the entire conversation, you've got the
internal Israeli point from Netanyahu and the rest
saying, we can't do we can't stop the
war. We're gonna fight until everyone Hamas is
gone. But we'll agree to a deal if
you let that happen. So, oh, so it's
not a ceasefire deal. Yes. It is. Well,
you don't want a ceasefire though. You wanna
fight until you kill the group that you're
making a deal with. Yes. But it's a
ceasefire. Yes. It's like, it's just dumb. You're
just literally saying the opposite is true. And
so what there you're getting from people like
her is we can't allow this. We can't
allow them to dictate what we need to
do. But then okay, then don't then stop
pretending you're agreeing to a deal when you
don't want anything about that deal.
Here's what Sky News reported. Here's what Blinken
said. Mister president, thank you very much. It's
always, good to be with you and, good
to be back in Israel. This is my
9th visit since October 7th to Israel.
What in the hell? Think about that. You
realize you don't need to be in Israel
to conduct diplomacy
over the things like you know, this is
an alarming
kind of situation.
Nine times?
That's once a that's almost once a month.
Maybe you should read into that like we
were talking about in the beginning. The Middle
East. And this is a decisive moment.
Probably the best,
maybe the last opportunity
to get the hostages home, to get a
ceasefire,
and to put everyone
on a better path
to enduring peace and security.
I'm here as part of an intensive diplomatic
effort on president Biden's instructions
to try to get this agreement to the
line and ultimately over the line.
It is time for it to get done.
So ask yourself
ask yourself
if he's there,
right, on 19th to talk about may to
getting this deal done.
And yet, weirdly, the outward narrative is Israel
and the US are on the same page.
We're trying to get Hamas to agree. Right?
So but but here's the interesting part. Hamas
isn't there, and I'll show you why.
K? So the game is it's all on
them. But then what are you doing there?
What why are you there trying to get
hit? And why is Caroline Glick going, this
is so hostile. We can't let them push
this on it.
You see how I mean, on the surface,
these things don't add up.
And the point is, what has happened every
single time is the same.
You could read these if you don't believe
me. Look at the in the information is
self evident.
Hamas agreed to a deal that at the
it's the it this is back on May
7th.
The exact same dynamic. You if you remember,
if you followed along, Blinken stood up and
said, Hamas Israel's agreed.
Now, Hamas better follow suit. He's even said,
Netanyahu says this or they agreed with that.
A better Hamas better come around.
Same thing. And then, what happened? Hamas said,
okay.
And then Israel goes, never mind, and attacks
Rapha.
I mean, it's as stupid as that. It's
unbelievably
obvious.
And then it happened again on the 2nd
June. Or rather, it was we reported on
the 2nd June. Israel once again refuses its
own ceasefire deal. And again, that's how dumb
this was. Blinken stood up and said, we
all agree. Now, Hamas better follow suit. And
then they did. And they went, no. Never
mind. That's the wrong you didn't agree to
the right one. Whatever. It's it's always nonsensical.
And the key point
every time is that Israel says they'll continue
to fight Hamas.
Then you don't want a ceasefire deal.
I mean, it's almost embarrassing not to talk
about this. It's really stupid.
And we just put up a new article
on 20th August. US backed ceasefire cocks, Gaza
ceasefire talks are a complete sham.
Now Robert did a really great job breaking
this down.
And it's it's it's it's really just walking
you through the obvious and self it proves
itself. The links in every one of these
explicitly
make the point.
And at the end, the main point that
this is not even a ceasefire deal. They've
now shifted into some weird overlap where they're
pretending it's the same deal. But the main
point he makes here, guys, is that this
is an agreement that was put forward by
the United Nations. Remember we showed you that?
I'm trying to grab it real quick off
the top of my head here. Then ultimately,
the United Nations Security Council agreed
with the outline.
Now that in itself got promoted as somehow
the agreement was there, but it was a
misunderstanding where the UN said, well, we agree
to the, the framework. Now it's on you
guys to find out the smaller details. Right?
So that is what Hamas has been adhering
to, and it's easy to prove.
And they said, we want this. We want
we want exactly that framework, which they all
essentially agreed on. Israel, now after there was
an agreement, has now walked it back and
said, this has to change.
So it's
fundamentally made it no longer a ceasefire deal.
It's an exchange, a hostage deal, for a
temporary pause.
Because they they wanna explicitly say that they're
not gonna stop fighting Hamas.
So it's all some kind of weird game.
At the end of the day, I think
the only way to read this is they
just wanna keep this going as long as
possible. They wanna keep you thinking they might
just be working towards it while making sure
that there's no possible way it could happen.
Because you're not gonna make a ceasefire deal
when one of the points is about not
having a ceasefire. That's really stupid.
But the important thing to realize is based
on the United Nations outline, this is the
the only deviation is from Israel.
Make sure you read that. Now this is
from 19th August. Blink I just showed you
the 19th discussion where he's there saying Biden
told him to pressure Israel to get what
they want. And here he is, Blinken says
Israel accepts the proposal, or just Hamas to
do the same.
It just never ends.
Here's 2 days ago, Israel accepts bridging proposal
for ceasefire deal. But wait a minute. That's
not the same thing. You're talking about ex
modifying. And we're again, Hamas wasn't even present
because at the end of the day, as
Robert outlines,
they're done playing this facade. They've agreed to
the outline from the UN. They've agreed to
the finer points that they claim they all
agree on. But they're not gonna play this
game where they keep going back to the
table for Netanyahu to pretend like we have
to keep biting Hamas. And for them to
keep saying, well, that doesn't align with what
we all agreed on. And for them to
go see Hamas doesn't wanna deal. They've done
it 14 times already.
So now they're not even there. But somehow
acting like this is all on Hamas even
though the only thing changing is the US
and Israel continuing to bat this back and
forth as some kind of an illusion.
Here is from the night or no. The,
excuse me. This is from the 19th as
well. Blinken says, Israel, okay, the plan to
break the ceasefire impasse and urges Hamas to
do the same. It just never ends. And
that's the point I want you to see
here.
Everybody,
Every single left, right, up, down, but it
doesn't matter. Everybody came out and said exactly
the same thing.
Blinken says Israel okay. Now it's on Hamas.
Every single I mean, it's crazy. When you
see this kind of alignment,
that says something. And then going back,
June 11th, Blinken urges Hamas to accept the
deal after Israel says okay. Blinken urges Hamas
to accept new Israel terms. That's April 29th.
This is May 1st. Blinken presses Hamas to
seal the Gaza deal. June 10th,
March 21st. June 11th. June 10th. I mean,
these are it's I mean, if you keep
going, you'll see that these are more sporadic
than you realize.
December 1st.
May 5th. I mean, it's the it's I
swear to god, I've seen this at least
10 times.
Probably way more than that, where they come
out and say, Israel agrees, but Hassan Hamas.
Arsen Ostrovsky
says sick and tired of all the misreporting
on the Israel on the latest hostage ceasefire
negotiations.
Now does he now is what they're calling
it. Right? But he goes, so why don't
you just listen to senator Blinken? Our secretary.
Excuse me. Well, here's what Blinken has to
say. Now this is posted
on 20th.
Last week,
the president put forward a proposal with Qatar,
and with Egypt
to try to bridge the gaps that remain
between the parties so that we could get
agreement to what the president put out there
a couple of months ago. So to break
that down, we're talking about, the deal that
was there, The deal that they keep saying
Israel has agreed to 17 times over before.
So what's changed? Why why are they now
at if it already was agreed to and
Hamas hasn't added any new terms, then why
is it now new for the 14th time?
Because this is a game to make it
continue to never stop.
What he's ultimately saying is we've produced the
bridge and the the info the the points
that are supposed to bridge the current deal
that we apparently Israel already agreed to to
what Israel now wants to add. And that
is specifically that we need to keep fighting
Hamas no matter what.
But yet all the news reports they've agreed
to a ceasefire.
But within that ceasefire, Israel has to never
have a ceasefire with Hamas.
That's how dumb it is. In a very
constructive meeting with prime minister Netanyahu today,
he confirmed to me that Israel
accepts the bridging proposal.
Yeah. Because they put it forward. The bridging
proposal is that they need to continue fighting
Hamas.
He supports it.
It's now incumbent on Hamas to do the
same.
And then
the parties with the help of the the
mediators, the United States, Egypt, and Qatar,
Both of which have already made clear that
Israel is the one holding this up. Same
with all of these really media, same with
anybody with a brain cell.
Have to come together
and
complete the process of reaching clear understandings about
how they'll implement the commitments. All this see
now then you're gonna get into a phase
where they have to then just bait for
45 months about how they implement the this
is designed to never stop.
That's all this is. Under the illusion of
some kind of normalcy.
And Hamas is not gonna keep coming back
for them to keep pretending like they want
something other than what they agreed to. That's
what this comes down to. And, oh, if
they do, every time they either frame it
as Hamas said no even though all they
said was you've changed it, or that they're
not here so they don't even want it.
That's all it's it's the same recycling of
the same lie.
Now this is on on 18th, Khaleesi said,
Blinken just arrived in Israel. Brace yourself for
more horrific massacres soon. And you know why
she's saying that? Because without fail, like with
attacking Rapha and Mae,
every time it gets close to a deal
where it looks more and more like they're
the only one holding it up because they
are, what do they do? They bomb and
murder and kill to distract everybody with all
oh my god. Look at what they just
did. They're literally using their own terrible actions
to hide what they're not doing.
Think about how sociopath I mean, that's crazy.
That's so that's psychopath.
Psychopathy.
She says, my statement was just over one
day old. And guess what? They've now bombed
their alba law, and this was on
20th.
Now, today, they've bombed a school. Perfectly in
line with what she's already predicting.
Here's Elon Levy, already jumping out ahead. Look
at this fake graphic we made, but you
can't verify for yourself. The IDF just took
out Hamas terrorists in a military base. Oh,
embedded in a former school though.
Also happened to be full of children though
that were hurt and starving, but that was
because Hamas though. But just believe us because
we never lied before. Right?
That's it. That's all you get. Civilians must
be protected from Hamas. And by doing that,
you mean murdering them?
Like, think about saying that at the end.
Civilians must be protected from Hamas. And your
argument is you're allowed to kill however many
you want to stop Hamas.
So how do you make sense of that?
I mean, this is my point about how
lazy their propaganda is. This is this is
the equivalent of saying, not just that we're
not the bad guys you think, but that
we are the most moral in the world.
Or, for example, saying, we don't wanna kill
civilians, but it's Hamas' fault. And taking it
all the way to saying, we must protect
them from Hamas. But you see, if you
wouldn't have pushed it like the idiot you
are, it would have maybe made sense. But
you can't pretend you're protecting them if your
job is to kill them to stop Hamas.
You absolute moron. I mean, it's like they
wanna be seen. Rami Abdul adds to this
the the previous discussion of the the, what
was the school again?
Now this has been taken down apparently. Anyway,
the point is,
they've already broken this down, EuroMed human right
group Human rights group have proven along with
a lot of other independent research groups that
the people they claim were the the responsible
Hamas terrorist at the last school they bombed.
Every single one of them have been proven
either to have been killed before or not
been, like, been a a provable not member
of Hamas, been killed before they said they
were there. I mean, any number of examples.
All of it broken down with evidence you
can verify yourself, but nobody cares because it
doesn't we're pat now we're we're on the
3rd school bombing beef after that.
Muhammad Sheikada adds an important point to the
school bombing conversation that comes from Israeli media.
Like a lot of the very important truths
that we keep finding that are challenging the
narrative that your government with Israel's government are
telling the west.
Of course, that won't be translated for some
reason.
That's interesting. First time I've seen that. Oh,
there it goes.
Channel 12 news. IDF's new method in Gaza
and opposite Hamas strategy in northern Gaza Strip.
Here's what he's breaking down. He says, Israel
reveals the reason for bombing multiple schools in
Gaza, which has been really increased a lot
lately, to forcibly expel 100 of thousands of
Gazans in the north. Now they don't want
the western audience to hear this, but this
is what the article explicitly says. IDF has
been trying to accomplish this for 10 months,
but failed to get everyone out of the
north. Right? And admits that Gazans refused to
leave despite their warnings because they don't wanna
leave their homes, guys.
Hamas is you get this game they're playing
about Hamas. These are people that are telling
you, we're not leaving our homes again. And
they murdered them for it.
Israel considers emptying Gaza's northern half
the center of the war and of consciousness
between the IDF and Hamas, they call it.
Hence, is quote, Israel's bombings in the northern
Gaza Strip is now significantly higher. The art
that's what the article is saying.
Explicitly on the they're saying, we want them
out of the way, so we increase the
bombing. Like, it's it's they don't care how
obvious this is.
They've increased the bombing more than anywhere else
in Gaza. To terrorize the population and force
them to flee is what he adds, but
I agree. That's what they're saying. Each of
those schools is housing thousands of refugees. Bombing
them sends a message that nothing is safe
in the north. But but, again, Gazans are
still refusing to leave. So expect more victims
in bombing, which we just saw today. He
posted this on 17th.
Elon Levy comes out and goes, oh, terrorism.
But they wrote an article 3 days ago
saying we're gonna bomb these areas to get
them to flee to the south.
I guess that's Elon's job is to basically
be the guy that eventually goes to prison
for lying about this so they can avoid
the rest of the government.
Yeah. I don't know if Elon knows that,
but that's what he's doing. He's filling the
role of the the patsy right now. Spreading
the fake news that hides the reality when
they're telling you what they're doing. Here's what
the article says.
There, it's just you can see it.
Oh, and it's it's always funny on the
different translations. Sticking to Gaza City is at
the center of the idea of Hamas consciousness.
Stern goes what we just read. The real
war on the road to victory is now
taking place in the Northern Gaza Strip.
Similar overlap. He says, clinging to the god
Gaza City is the in the center of
the psychological struggle between IDF and Hamas. Here's
what it says over here. Clinging to the
Gaza City at the center of the war,
same point, it says, this is the real
war happening now in the north of the
Gaza Strip. Hamas is succeeding in its firm
grip. We must be more determined than the
population.
Only the evacuation of about a quarter of
a people, a 1000000 people from the north
will create the necessary turnaround.
So all they're saying is we're bombing people
in these schools, not because we can prove
Hamas is there, but because we need them
out of the way to further pressure Hamas.
And then 3 days later, they bomb a
school, kill a lot of children, and they
go,
Hamas. It makes me sick how obvious this
is. And people just
both republicans and democrats in this country are
allowing this to happen.
Max Blumenthal reports on 17th as well. 100
of thousands are displaced. Again, this is day
after day after day. Last time we showed
you, there was, what, it was, 12 displacements
in 13 days.
The in Communist, the safe zone, yet again,
under bombardment. The horrors of the Gaza holocaust
play out before our eyes day after day
with our politicians com compete for the affection
of the Israeli death camp regime.
Alimizrais
wants to point out something, and I agree
with him. As talk of a deal is
being circulated yet again on pro genocide media
outlets, he says, I feel like I need
to reshare my thought my month's old mantra.
There is no deal and there will not
be a deal. Israel and the US don't
want a deal. They want to exterminate the
entirety of the Palestinian people to make room
for a big Israel, which is what they're
openly telling you, by the way. The only
talk of a deal to give their extermination
campaign a diplomatic cover and some idiot level
deniability,
and equally to fool the resistance and to
torment the Palestinians and their supporters with false
hopes. After Gaza, if it is not stopped,
Israel is turning to the West Bank and
East Jerusalem. And from there, Jordan,
Egypt,
every other location that they clearly show is
part of the Greater Israel Project. It's on
the record. It's not a secret.
To kill, ethnically cleanse all remaining Palestinians in
those areas and anybody else in their way.
This war is not stopping, and Israel is
not stopping until stopped or runs out of
ammo. This is continuous war till the end,
not a day sooner.
Sadly, I agree. That's why we need to
do something.
Now don't forget,
Case you needed more to understand this, that
Israel's media has been screaming about this for
months now.
How Netanyahu has systematically
foiled talks to release hostage from captivity. The
the most upsetting thing about all this is
that the Israeli population are also calling this
out. Not from the perspective that they wanna
hurt save Palestinians by and large, but because
they've already recognized. The longer we leave them
there, and everyone that comes home tells us
that they're being killed by Israeli bombs. I
frankly can't stop seeing how obviously intentional that
is. Either way, the world around us going,
Netanyahu's deliberately stopping these deals. And then idiots
like Michael Rapaport come up and convince whoever's
willing to be dumb enough to fall for
it that they it's it's all part of
the Hamas.
Their own media are so is is Heretz
and Channel 12, are they racist? Are they
anti Semites, Mike? How does that work for
you?
I mean, the only people showing you how
dumb they are are the people that are
blindly lying for Israel at to their detriment.
Do you think Israel's gonna come protect you
when eventually you get some accountability for the
lies you were spinning?
It's it's just embarrassing.
But here is the newest report. Netanyahu added
new conditions to ceasefire report.
It's everywhere, and it's obvious.
Israel and US law have blamed Hamas for
stealing talks, but the new document suggest Netanyahu
has obstructed progress.
Of course, you could pretend that's not true,
but then ask yourself why Israeli media in,
like, 17 different articles have said the exact
opposite. Netanyahu is deliberately making sure this doesn't
happen.
It's very sad.
Now here is a report from Cradle.
Hamas reveals details of latest US proposal for
Gaza ceasefire. So again, you can read through
this. It's exactly what we already covered in
a more nuanced way. Hamas ex exposing the
exact point. Here is what they're showing us.
Here is what they're doing. The only thing
they want is to not have a ceasefire
while pretending they're fighting for a ceasefire.
And
then I was gonna come back to this
I guess but I'll move it down again
since I don't think it fits here either,
maybe right there. But the point is is
the video showing you the the horrendous nature
of what they're doing.
But here's Jerusalem Post. Cease fire sticking points
indicate Hamas' plan to return to power.
Oh, okay. So the whole point is that
the democratically elected as they frame it, I
don't believe that, but that's that's how they're
telling you. The democratic elected government is not
supposed to be the one in power, or
the fact that the whole point is about
allowing them to decide their future, or the
fact that you wanna pretend like you you
want you want any type of deal to
ever happen anyway. Like, it's so embarrassing.
But, see, this is the second part of
it. So one side, they're just going ceasefire.
It's all their fault even though they're making
sure it doesn't happen. Then the bigger point
is that supposed ceasefire deal, which they won't
let happen, is of of course in the
minds of the liars in the United States
and Blinken and Biden and the rest of
them pretending, and Kamala or RFK or Trump
or all the rest, that it will lead
to a 2 state solution.
Equally,
I guess, fanatical fantasy.
The point is that here, we can prove
to you that outwardly and, by the way,
for the last however long it's ever been
talked about, post 67, they do not and
explicitly say they will never allow a 2
state solution. But your government pretends every day
that's what they all want.
This is Jewish Jerusalem Post telling you that
we can't allow Hamas to be in power
because that will ruin the deal. Well, that's
not for you to decide.
At the end of the day, if we're
talking about some kind of a deal where
they have self determination, they get to decide
who's in power.
It's the same point they made made about
Brian Mast trying to make some ignorant point
that I don't think he thought through about
how the people in charge of this transition
don't know
who's gonna be in power. And I was
like, do you not realize how dumb that
is? Like, you're trying to pretend democracy, but
here you are making fun of them because
they don't know who's gonna be that means
that you know it's not democracy, you moron.
It's like, these people are actively not thinking
these things through, but I think it's more
about just trying to convince you that you're
supposed to side with Israel.
The squirrel points out one of the lines,
Zionist genocide queen Kamala Harris loves repeating as
part of her I see you, I hear
you routine, she's so ridiculous,
is quote, we need a 2 state solution.
And she usually pads it by adding some
buzzwords that make coconut pilled pseudo radicals think
it's some huge major shift from other politicians
that came before her when it's literally the
exact same line from Bill Clinton and to
Obama to her or Trump, or the rest
of them. Can someone remember, he was the
one really pushing the ridiculous Abraham Accords, which
all they really were,
were him forcing governments to pretend to be
okay with Israel when nobody was okay with
that. And even Saudi Arabia never ultimately happened.
They were all being coerced or bribed or
threatened.
But it says can or bribed. I think
that's a bribe. It says, can someone ask
her how we get to a Tuesday solution
when she has vowed to forever arm and
fund Israel no matter what? And they just
recently again explicitly announced that they will annex
the rest of the occupied Palestine. Like, you
can't it's it's like pretending you want a
ceasefire, but not allowing a ceasefire.
They are telling you we're gonna annex the
rest of the territory. The only way you
can have a 2 state solution is if
you give that territory to Palestine or to
the gods to the Palestinians.
The US has been saying for decades that
they will support a 2 state solution. That's
not new. Kamala didn't come up with that.
Genocide Joe supports that. Bill Clinton, Obama, and
even George Bush and other republicans formally support
that, or they claim to anyway.
Just because Kamala adds a twist to it,
you haven't heard before because you're a I
don't know what he means by coconut pilled
pseudo radical who doesn't know anything about the
history history of any of this but going
By going quote, the legitimate route to Palestinian
self determination must be achieved doesn't mean there
is any change. She's using the terms now
to get win back some people that might
tell themselves they were misinformed or maybe Biden
was the bad one. Genocide Joe, but she's
okay. They're just trying to play you just
like the Republicans are doing the same right
now.
He says, you know who said that exact
same thing? Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Obama, George
Bush, Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney, John McCain.
Now you're hearing it for the first time
from Kamala, and you think it's some huge
major shift. Oh my god, you said Palestinian's
legitimate right to self determination. They're just trying
to play you guys.
Now here, what to to make her point,
or the squirrel's point,
Elon Levy says, I hope that's not true.
This would reward Hamas for taking the hostages
in the first place and encourage it to
take more.
It says the biggest incentive, the US
stupid grok thing getting away. The biggest incentive,
US officials said, is a meaningful pathway to
an independent state.
I don't see the mention of Hamas in
there. So what he's literally trying to argue
is that any creation of any state would
benefit Hamas.
You see, all that's that's the whole they
do and that's Hamas that they've put in
power, that they have funded, that they are
continuing to support up until 2020.
Bottom line,
they will never allow a 2 state solution.
Now their bet their desperate effort is to
try to conflate that with all Hamas, even
if they're not there. Because their point is
they won't allow this till Hamas is gone.
Again, I guess, you know, it's these guys'
logic is pretty painful.
Now,
this is the other part. We played this
recently, but I wanna play it again. This
is,
Hassan speaking with the former head of Shin
Bet. He said and Kenneth Ross, as we
often forget, Israel helped create, I would argue
created Hamas. Now in the sense that there
was an entity before that, but they turned
it into what they have today
in order to weaken the PLO
and divide the Palestinians ultimately,
allowing money to flow from Qatar.
Now here is yet again an example that
we've heard many times. This is more than
one example. It's not some conspiracy theory, and
it wasn't about humanitarian aid. You don't bring
in suitcases full of cash in a place
where you can't just buy aid. That's why
it's shipped in
to a group to buy aid. That's ridiculous
like every other Israeli propaganda point.
October 7th.
Do you believe Netanyahu
was deliberately propping up Hamas in Gaza as
a way of dividing Palestinians
and preventing a 2 state solution?
Well, his policy, and, he didn't hide it.
He's totally against,
reality in which, there is a Palestinian state
alongside Israel.
He said it.
His policy,
the way he explained it,
is divide and control to make sure
that Palestinians will not have a unified,
government?
That's the point. He goes on from kinda
rambles for a minute, but the point is
very clear. Yes to divide.
So the like like every point before this,
I always make the point. I don't know
how then we would at least not ask
whether the whole election was a sham.
I mean, can you remember? It was a
it was a plurality. It wasn't even a
majority. It was like 45% voted for them.
And since then, a whole new generation is
there. So you can't pretend like a child
is not responsible for that. And on top
of that, are we really gonna pretend with
everything we know that Israel would go, we
know they're terrorists, but we're gonna let you
vote and hope for the best? Come on.
I real even with even with US pressure,
if you believe with what we see today
that was actually happening, I just don't believe
it. But I could be wrong. Either way,
here is all the way to 2020.
Assad chief visited Qatar
to urge Cutter to continue Hamas aid. 2020.
Right up until October 7th, they were funding
Hamas, guys. It's not debatable.
Now, in regard to the West Bank, to
make that point about the 2 state solution,
they're never ever ever going to allow this.
This whether you think that maybe even Netanyahu
wants it, he's lost control. His own radical
movements are rapidly writhing away. They're gonna they're
acting in all sorts of erratic directions. Now
we shouldn't even call it erratic. It's clearly
part of the larger plan. But the settler
movement, the West Bank settlers themselves, the different
parts of his coalition that are, like, psychopathic
entities.
I mean, he's far right. This guy's a
lunatic himself, obviously. But the crazy part is
to realize that the people he surrounded himself
with for his own survival are
loony tunes.
And he knows that. His own media has
written about why he lined up with them.
And there's a whole push right now. I
think I actually just had this let me
see if I'll get it to come up.
There it is.
This is from her ex. Oh, maybe I
No, I don't have it up here. So
this is It says the ultra nationalist cancer
even reaches Israel's hospitals. Now, of course, you
can get away from, like, I've always maintained
it. Just being a nationalist is not the
same as a racist.
There's there could be overlap like there can
be anywhere, but it's not the same. They
love to make that conflation. But this is
about the idea of I mean, you could
use ultranationalist if you read about it. They're
just talking about the same people. The Gavirs,
the Smotrichs, these people are lunatics,
as as B'Tselem would call it, Jewish supremacy.
But I see I tend to see it
more of a Zionist manipulation.
Either way, these people are extremist even by
their own party's
perception.
And they are driving this country into a
very dangerous position where even their own people
and their own other parts of their government
are going, these guys are crazy.
And your own government is blindly supporting it.
Why do you think that is? How can
you possibly make sense of that? You've got
the tools. We've already talked about it today.
Now here at BM is pointing out, Net
and Yahoo,
openly telling you, quote, with God's help, we'll
we'll apply Jewish sovereignty, which he means Zionist,
over all settlements as part of the land
of Israel.
Right? So they're literally we're gonna we're taking
everything.
September 2019, West Bank settlement. He's already talked
about this. It's a long time coming. It's
not just October 7th forward. But it's gotten
way more rabid since then.
Eunice Terrari points out that inside of Gaza,
they've been which shows you, one, that you
have settlers going into Gaza, which means the
IDF is facilitating that. Shouldn't surprise you. They're
leaving signs that say, here, we will build
the settlement of Goosh Katif.
That's what that says.
And guess what?
The Israeli military hung these posters there
after they destroyed the the hotel in Gaza
City that was there before.
So they are and and just so you
it's clear, there's multiple examples of these settlers
already coming in. Even making, like, sort of
like a symbolic, but like a built up
thing along the wall on the inside
to pretend like we're starting to build.
It's on the surface.
Francesca Francesca Albany says the the settlers then
assaulted the boys, broke their legs, and urinated
on them, according to the United Nations. These
are rabid, wild settlers. Illegal. It says, PS,
Israel will do all it can to remove
United Nations out of the territory that it
unlawfully occupies. Punishment for for its vital documentation
work, One target at a time.
So these are there's been piss these people
that have been trying to document this a
lot more than usual lately.
It's going were the world around.
It's unreal. I mean, these people are some
of the war more these are the people
that are being led, by the way, we
just talked about this, by the Ben Gavir
and Smoachers. The Lee I think it's Lior,
d,
Dov Lior, I think, is the rabbi that
they all ascribed to. And he is openly
pushing all of this stuff. I mean, even
Netanyahu called him the one of the I
I get the exact frame, quote, but it
was something like, the true leader or most
powerful or something like that because he leads
or they all through him lead all of
the illegal settlers.
So they've got this massive settler militia that
is dangerous to everybody else. I mean, they're
attacking the military. They're attacking anybody.
These are the dangerous elements.
And the Israeli society is calling this out.
So they're going, look, you're raping, you're burning
people alive, you're stealing homes, you're everything.
Even the US flirted with sanctioning them until
they got,
you know,
chastised by Smotrich and they fell away. The
US government.
But it's everywhere.
Ryan Grim highlights another example of an American
who got shot by these people. That's like
the third one in the last so many
weeks. And where's the US government? Where's Trump?
Where's RFK? Where's Biden?
What has that whole game where they don't
stand up and condemn it or that it
doesn't matter. Where's this? What about the Americans
that got shot by Israel? Funny how that
doesn't matter to you guys.
Now realize, these are settlers that have been
given official capacity by the Israeli government.
He says, Anthony c, an activist,
which is working to protect this group, Farzah
or something, is working to protect homes in
the West Bank.
Not because of Hamas, but because just Israel
destroying homes, because they're maniacs.
This video is an American who got shot
by the IDF.
By the military, not the settlers.
Not much of the video. Just showing showing
them take him somewhere.
The point is this keeps happening.
Ryan Grim, I believe, of the intercept. Right?
Or no. Now it drops site news.
Full story here. You can read for yourself.
I mean, this is, like, the third example
in a short period of time. It's always
a may imagine if this was a Ukrainian
shot by or American shot by Russia or
American shot by China, let alone 3 in
a short period of time.
Such hypocrisy. Where is all the Tuckers in
the world? Where are they about this? Don't
you care about Americans getting shot by Israel?
I guess as long as it's Israel, nobody
cares.
Sarah Abdallah points out that in this is
not Gaza. This is on 15th.
This is the village of Jit in occupied
West Bank. Set ablaze. Now, this was you
already saw this. This went around the conversation
where there were settlers that set this high
whole neighborhood on fire. And of course, she
got the the blanket statements of concern from
the Patel's. But guess what? Israel's gonna investigate.
We'll let you know. Moral and strategic imperative
and whatever.
It's not self defense. This is terrorism.
No question. And guess what? They set these
homes on fire in the middle of the
night while they were sleeping with their families.
Your government doesn't care.
You saw a fraction of this even suggested
by Israel in Gaza. You'd hear about it
for 14 weeks straight. Here are Zionists burning
down the homes
of Jews
because they're anti Zionist.
That makes sense. Right?
Aren't they all protecting the Jewish population? No.
They're protecting Zionists.
Pretending they're protecting Jewish people. Because people around
the world don't know this is happening. Or
the Orthodox Jews that get beat up in
the middle of the street by the IDF
because they resist Zionism.
It's everywhere.
And for the Christians out there that believe
you're supporting Zionism because you think that's what
you should do, right now, Israel is wiping
out Christian locations around the world. We saw
this in Syria. We saw this in Iraq.
We're seeing it yet again here.
This is one of the last Christian villages
in Palestine.
They're building they're wiping this out so Israeli
settlers can build their own settlement over this.
Doesn't stop.
This is what they just did.
Oh, and look. And they put a little
cross up there for you just to mock
you.
Keep supporting Zionism,
guys. Now, Asarad points out the hot contradiction.
Right? So we can see what Israel's media
is saying is going on. Here's Horace. Investigation
shows settler raid on Palestinian village took place
right in front of the IDF forces who
did nothing. That's the Herets leading newspaper in
Israel.
Here's the US media.
Israeli settlers storm West Bank Village, drawing rare
rebukes from Israeli officials.
Really?
You won't find the conversation about how the
IDF allowed it, defended them while it went
on.
They're just gaslighting you into thinking, woah. It's
just the fringe bad apples. No. This is
systematic. Like the rape, like everything else we've
talked about, they are making this happen. It's
systematic.
Human shields. We're ordering you to do it.
This is not some anomaly, guys. Khaleesi points
out the Israeli settlers set fire to their
houses,
and here's the video of it,
normalizing burning people alive.
Middle of the night.
Setting the couch on fire.
I mean, guys, you even have video evidence
for crying out loud.
It's just disgusting. And the worst part about
it is Robert covered this back on the
June 21st.
Israeli settlers have consistently used arson to burn
Palestinians
alive
well before October 7th, but it's gone increasingly
the the amount of this
I know of at least 3 times we've
talked about this since October 7th. Here's an
example of a child
before October 7th that they burned alive and
then went on to taunt the family members.
You've seen this story where they talk about
Ollie on the grill.
All the details and facts are in here
for you directly from Times of Israel. Jewish
extremists taunt Ollie's on the grill at their
relatives.
Here's the video of them literally burning an
effigy of a baby while they dance around
and make fun of it. But, yeah, it's
all misunderstood. Right? You're a racist or something.
Your government and Israeli government don't just support
them. They arm them. They give them official
capacity.
B, BM points out Ben Gavirs, as he
calls them judo nazi storm stormtroopers,
beat the living hell out of 2 random
teenagers that are Palestinian
in the northern town of Abu Sanon. This
is in Israel.
These are Israel these are Palestinians with Israeli
citizenship. He says, this is the reality of
Palestinian citizens of Israel, not the bogus coexistence
narrative they habar habar habar habar habar habar
habar habar habar habar habarists
try to tell you.
Just drag them off their bikes and just
beat them up in the street. Now just
we you can make up a narrative if
you want. It makes you feel better about
how they threw rocks or something bad. But
the point is, they just beat them up,
don't charge them, and leave.
Here, Zachary Foster points out the reality of
apartheid.
And also the disgusting racist nature of these
people borderline border let me I'll just read
what he says. He goes, here's a Jewish
Israeli, and you could hit all the links
are there for you.
Who could do and a Jewish Israeli, he
says, can post, quote,
not everything the Nazis did was bad. The
gypsies were and still are a very serious
problem.
Yeah. Totally not racist at all. Right? With
no consequence whatsoever.
But when Palestinian Israelis post a solidarity message
with the victims of genocide, they're arrested.
He he he break it all down for
you. That's apartheid for you. Also shows you
a disgusting overlap with the ideology they pretend
they're fighting. Right?
Now here, he goes on and makes an
entire thread of 15
different and former Israeli leaders who are telling
you what they live through as an apartheid
state.
Or just grabbing B'Tselem for you.
And you could find, as you can see
here, AMETT International, Human Rights Watch, Beth Salim,
leading Israeli human rights group that literally says,
a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea, this is apartheid,
January 2021. You know, you'd think the leading
Israeli human rights group calling it apartheid might
make a difference, but guess not.
Because there's something a much darker going on
around all of this.
But he goes on a list of all.
It is a part it's an erase it's
a racist apartheid regime, guys. There's not it's
not up for debate.
Zionism is racism.
Israel cannot be both. Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody. And
that's on the list of the nation state
law and every we played it many times.
I'm gonna have to wrap here pretty soon,
but I wanted to make sure we finish
this off.
Here is an important clip. This is a
Jewish man
in Israel.
Or this in this case, in the West
Bank, who is standing in the way of
the IDF soldiers and calling them out. Just,
I just want you guys to make sure
we don't miss the fact that it's despite
the clear majority, it is not every Israeli
or every Jew that believes this stuff. They're
Some of them are standing up. Like Jewish
voices for peace in this country who are
pushing back against the Ben Shapiro's of the
world. Yet, he calls them he calls them
disgusting derogatory things, but yet calls you racist.
Even though a Jew who goes against Zionism,
he calls not a Jew. So who's the
racist in that conversation? The one that are
standing along with Jewish people fighting Zionism or
the Jew who is attacking other Jews that
don't believe in Zionism? You can decide for
yourself. Here is a Jew standing up against
this, telling him, you are a disgrace to
Judaism.
Words, you hide behind the guns of the
soldiers who protect you.
But know this,
for property will not last eternity.
Your strength is merely temporary, and the wicked
will not prevail forever.
Make no mistake.
The whole world is watching.
They know
your days on this land are numbered.
And since we have no expectations of you
doing the right thing to leave the land
that you have seized from innocent people,
we have no doubt that soon others will
evict you.
Whoever you are, you,
the reader of these words,
you and your accomplices
to theft and robbery in the name of
racism,
in the name of Jewish supremacy,
and above all, in the name of evil,
morally corrupt, illegitimate
regime, which is treated as a pariah state
by the international community,
you are a disgrace to Judaism
and indeed to the human race.
Signed,
humans of the world, Jews, Muslims,
Christians, Jews, and to any
Sorry. I'm muted. The what's funny about this,
the I bet you if this was
in any other circumstance
that they would have beat him up. They
would have done something, arrested him. But I
think what's interesting is this is what I
was just talking about. There's a whole group
around him. There and there's there's Americans. There's
people from the UK. People that have been
they've been showing up. I showed you this
one, the blonde kid. I've shown you a
few times now. He's been he's been doing
this nonstop. Where they're protesting. They're they're trying
to block them from blocking the aid or
stopping them from taking prisoners. It's it's crazy.
And putting themselves right in no harm's way.
So it's a lot of courage.
I'm arguing though that if they didn't have
that group there, knowing that there's international eyes
watching that they would have acted a lot
differently. We've seen it already.
But just to know that there are people
there that are pushing back. But here's Ben,
Smotrich,
says this afternoon on
18th,
the Smotrich, the the minister overseeing Israel's unlawful
occupation of Palestinian territory, visited the outskirts of
Bethlehem,
vowing to bring an unprecedented
wave of demolitions upon Palestinian homes, livelihood, and
donor funded humanitarian aid. Like, this guy doesn't
care. He's the one openly saying, we want
a regional war. Like, he's challenging all these
people. He's he's coming out and saying, we
wanna murder them. They're not allowed to live.
We wanna demolish everything. We're gonna demolish their
homes. We're gonna stop the aid. Like, just
everything they claim is not true. He's out
there going, yeah.
Because these people are crazy. He's literally the
one him and Gavir have seemingly kind of
I argue that they're worried about what they
could marshal if they decide to push back
against other parts of the government, like civil
war level. Here's his actual translated tweet you
can read for yourself.
Here's a clip from Ryan Risbiani showing you
how this works. How the settlers the the
ridiculous settlers here, they're all there illegally, and
how they're supported blindly by the IDF. Just
letting them do whatever they want. Watch the
full video. There's a 1,000 of them. Franchesca
Albanese pointing out,
it has happened for decades. During her time
in Palestine,
she's seen with her own eyes violent settler
assault against Palestinians in Jerusalem as well as
across the West Bank under the watch, and
even the active participation
of the IDF.
It's everywhere, guys.
APAC
tracker
points out with the Atlantic who put it
just put this article up. The false narrative
of settler colonialism.
This is a new article. I can't how
embarrassing this
is. And he says, reminder, the editor in
chief of the Atlantic served in the IDF.
Well, gee. I wonder why. I mean, this
is how dumb this is. We just did
a show on this. On May 13th, Zionism
is settler colonialism. To be clear, that's not
an opinion. Like that's so that's how embarrassing
this is for these people pretending to be
journalists, knowing that they're either that bad at
their job or just choosing to lie to
you. Here's one of many different art, different
documents you could look
at. This from the UN. But you'll find
this this is discussed
the the point is and this is just
one. Watch the show. At the time,
Zionists were calling themselves that. That's what they
described themselves as. I have multiple source links
in that article. But it says at the
present, the contradictions of settler colonialism are catching
up with Israel. Like, this is what's openly
discussed at this time. Now this was
this was 1991.
It says questions of Palestine, legal aspects, because
they never existed. Right? But if you just
look up either any part of this, you'll
find, you know, both Israel and white, white
South Africa are artificial settler states, things like
that.
Or colonialism itself. It says, the contradictions of
settlers oh, those are the ones I just
read.
I mean, you get the point. I mean,
it's it's just so ridiculous how we can
make the arguments that it's not what it
is. Even though they they they're the founders
of Zionism called themselves that.
But we're in a very desperate time right
now where all they're trying to do is
obfuscate because they're losing.
And now this is worm cited saying the
deputy director of the legal aid organization that
Ben Gavir worked for is endorsing Jewish terrorism
in the West Bank on the grounds that
it's no different from the IDF massacring massacring
women and children in Gaza.
He says, quote, it's intentional. It's strategic. It's
right.
Now, I mean, they're just coming right out
of telling you this as long as it's
in something you have to translate. They're just
hoping that no they they know what they
know is that your media and your governments
will blindly obfuscate for you. Why do you
think that is?
We have to be catching on by now.
And then I'll just I'm gonna skip this
for time, but you've seen these clips showing
you what's going on.
Now Candace Owens was highlighting that and this
is doctor Taylor Marshall
quoting Eric Salmons. Saying according to Cardinal
Bizballah, the Israeli police are denying Christians the
freedom of worship. Shouldn't be surprising to you
guys. We've shown you this countless times. But
Christians in the United States don't seem to
wanna recognize this, or they don't care. A
lot of the Trump supporters just they would
never wanna believe this. It's very real. As
he says, the cardinal patriot,
patriarch of Jerusalem
reports the state of Israel is persecuting Christians.
And Candace writes, they are they also supply
the arms to mass murder Christians in Armenia.
And don't get me started on the Mossad
operations in the Congo where Christians are also
being slaughtered. This is a classic anywhere you
look. As I said, look at Syria. Had
the 3rd largest Christian population of the Middle
East before they started doing what they're doing.
Weird how every one of the war on
terror locations that the US did in interest
for Israel
seemingly targeted the Christian populations and grew the
terrorists they claimed they were fighting. You know,
the groups that were otherwise being secretly funded
by Israel and United States that they're using
to justify what they're doing. Not every single
example but by and large, like the moderate
rebels
or Al Qaeda or ISIS, it's undeniably obvious
at this point and hopefully we can acknowledge
that.
Now I'll go over this in the future.
This is the point of, this woman at
Saint Andrews University
or of University of Saint Andrews is being
persecuted for simply highlighting
the truth of Israel.
Saying it's an apartheid state because it is.
It's undeniable. It is the static and objective
reality, but she got persecuted. And she got
removed for a position
because of it.
That's what we're seeing around the world. And
because as we showed you in the beginning,
Israel has these academic influences because those are
loopholes and they are getting people fired. They
are influencing policy through that.
Francesca Albanese puts ban the banality of evil
in action, enabling genocide this time against the
Palestinian people. It's so disappointing to read that
in Australia,
the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra has canceled a renowned
pianist performance
after he spoke out about journalists murdered in
Gaza.
Think about how crazy that is. Those who
suffer genocide are the most unprotected and humanity
obliges us to stand up for them using
all means at our disposal. So he stood
up and said, killing people is wrong. And
they boo they kicked him out of the
orchestra in Australia.
You're not allowed to have an opinion about
genocide now?
How do you not see that as direct
influence of the AIPAC, ADL, Israel, kind of,
as we called it before? The election interfering
and psychological operation
industrial complex.
I mean, they just pull a string. Boom.
You're fired from your job in Australia because
you spoke out about what the world already
sees as a genocide?
God damn. That's crazy.
And this is I'll I'll have to play
this one. You know, let's do this. I'm
gonna play this and then I'm gonna end
with the last clip.
The rest of it was and this is
the clip right there. Some foreign policy stuff
I was gonna get into, I'll get in
later, or the many different clips of them
speaking, or here is the, you know, blinkin'
on the 12th thing. Today, we commemorate the
75th anniversary of Geneva Convention and just everybody
ripping them apart.
The yaughing post. The Biden administration is finalizing
plans to urge Switzerland to reject a request
from Palestine
and its supporters to hold a conference on
violations of the Geneva Convention. That's 2023.
You're trying to pressure other governments to not
let them use the Geneva Convention, but here
you are going, yay. We believe in it.
Like, nobody. I mean, if anybody still pretends
like the US government has any moral standing,
I mean, I've got a bridge and a
vaccine to sell you.
Here, same thing. The day he announced $29,000,000,000
in arms sales to the genocidal state of
Israel, we believe in Geneva Convention.
How embarrassing.
Or you literally are violating the Geneva Convention
right now by arming Israel, but yay, we
believe in Geneva Convention. Or the fact that
the Geneva Convention is what gives Palestine the
right of armed resistance. But who cares? Because
we believe in Geneva Convention. It's like, it's
we should laugh and ridicule these people everywhere
they go.
Now we're gonna end with this clip.
As I said, thanks for the clarification,
Patel.
As we already knew, the US government doesn't
care about what Israel's doing. It only cares
about what Israel says they are doing, their
policy.
You feckless coward.
But this is a government announced settlement. This
isn't an outpost. So, I mean, it's the
same question, really.
If you oppose it, I don't quite see
why you can't stop it. He's talking about
settlements. Right? So the same thing he's making
this guy keeps calling him out. You can't
just be going, we're against that and we'll
raise the issue. The point is, if you
keep saying you're against it, but it keeps
happening, what's the point?
Finally, a real question.
I'm I'm sorry. I don't really follow, Tom.
I mean Of course, you don't. To give
it to you. Of course, you don't understand
when a understand when a real question gets
asked. Hundreds of, settlement announcements, and they they
are all then built. So what's the point
of repeatedly saying you oppose them? Right. It
is important for us to make clear our
perspective and our point of view as well
as to,
raise these sometimes tough and difficult conversations with
our Israeli Oh, not. He had conversations, not
issues, but same point.
So the real question is, what difference does
it make? And he knows that. They don't
listen. Nobody cares. So the point you're making
is that you don't care either. There's no
way to miss that. If you just keep
going through the motions and it all keeps
happening, this is a cycle of allowance. It's
a cycle of complicity.
It's all it is.
Partners and will continue to do so. But
doesn't it I mean, doesn't it just expose
the weakness of your position Yes. In that
you can say something and says your policy,
but clearly, it doesn't have any effects on
the ground.
I would,
take issue with that characterization,
Tom. These are not, actions that the United
States is,
party to. Certainly not ones that we That
doesn't make any difference.
If you're criticizing the issue with what he
just said, the point is that that means
you don't have any influence that honor you're
allowing it. To say that you're not taking
part in it is not the point. But,
again, he knows that.
The only reality here is that if you've
never stopped any of them, then you have
a weak position or you're allowing it. Simple.
Position in that you can say something and
says your policy, but clearly, it doesn't have
any effects on the ground.
I would,
take issue with that characterization,
Tom. These are not, actions that the United
States is,
party to, certainly not ones that we are
involved with. Ultimately,
Even though in many different ways, that directly
affects what the legalities of what they're allowed
to do, whether it's funding or armed. They
know all this.
Israel is a a sovereign country that's gonna
make its own decisions.
That does not detract or change from the
fact that when we see things, when we
see policy decisions, when we see You can
stand up and go, we don't like that,
and then let them keep doing it. Sounds
like a real good policy. Actions that we
disagree with that we think are not just
in the interest in the United States, but
also not in the interest of the region,
we won't hesitate to say so.
It is not dissimilar from circumstances in other
countries in which the United States is not
party to those decisions, but when we see
something we disagree with, we certainly will make
our voices heard, and that continues to be
the case here. I will also say that
the the bigger issue here, Tom, is that
we wanna see these kinds of things end,
and that is why we're so committed to,
Arming and funding the genocide?
Getting to a 2 state solution because we
think that is the only You know, the
the the very thing that they've explicitly said
long before October 7th, but publicly since October
7th, that they will never allow.
So this is the same this is like
another point, like game of the ceasefire.
They're just going through the cycle. They let
them do murder, and then go, we don't
agree. But then they said, we have to
work with them to achieve this night. The
end that will stop the murder, and they
murder again. They go, we don't agree, but
we have to work with them to stop
it so we can stop the murder in
general, and they murder again. Round and round
it goes. And at what point do you
go, you don't care about the murder?
Only path forward for the region. And when
we see things like this that are inconsistent
with that, we won't hesitate to say so.
Well, you wanna stay 2 state solution, but
I mean Except you don't call out the
inconsistency of them saying that and then not
actually doing it. Or you saying they want
it when they say explicitly they don't.
Funny how you don't call out that contradiction.
Obviously, you know why. Motrich himself said in
announcing the settlement, we'll continue to fight the
dangerous idea of a Palestinian state and establish
facts on the ground. This is my life's
mission, and I will continue it as much
as I can. Right? Right. So he's on
the record going, no matter what, this is
happening.
I mean, that that's think about trying to
respond to that after acting like we're working
with them to achieve the things that he
just outlined that I'll never ever ever allow.
Okay. Go, Patel. What do you have to
say? That's what you're up against when you're
saying you oppose the building of peace settlements.
Clearly, this will go ahead, and it will
not just go ahead, but it will go
ahead,
in occupied territory where you are arming the
military force which will facilitate its establishment.
So you're saying you oppose it, but you're
arming the military force that facilitates its establishment.
We have a security relationship with the IDF,
Tom. I don't dispute that. That, that of
course continues to be the case. How are
we solving a settlement about self defense of
green line sovereign Israel?
We don't think it is, Tom. Ah, got
him right there because the point is your
your argument of your security agreement is about
their self defense, at least as you pretend.
So arming them to continue to implement your
illegal actions and in pretending like you don't
like those actions proves that you're facilitating the
actions and giving yourself a cover.
It's very simple. You see how easy it
is for people to just ask real questions
and to have them just like, even when
they're asking or trying to sidestep,
they ultimately, many times, expose their position because
very few people, other than the ones we
highlight, ask real questions. We we do not
think that the expansion of the settlement program
isn't Israel's security interest. We think it detracts
from a 2 state solution and causes further
instability and insecurity. I've Well, based on that
one statement, you would stand back and go,
okay. So 75 years of them never stopping
and always doing it instead of what we
want, maybe we shouldn't have agreements with them.
But obviously, you could see clearly that proves
to you that they don't care about that.
That they say that to make you think
they do, their agreement is letting them do
whatever they want. Said these things a number
of times. The point that I'm making is
that these are not actions that the United
States is party to.
I know. I don't even think he accused
you of that. You see that? All that
really shows you at the end is that
he feels like he's fighting off an accusation
that they're responsible.
But in all the only point in which
their responsibility overlaps is that you're arming them
and defending it. The first point was just
about you keep saying you don't like it
and they keep doing it. But he immediately
came from a point of we're not responsible.
It's like, well, nobody said that, man. But
your response shows you that you clearly get
what people are getting at and that you
know that you are. Yeah. Go ahead. Asked
I asked about Ben Gavir and what he's
done on the Temple Mount. And,
to Tom's question, you know, you mentioned tools
and the US toolkit.
The US hasn't used any tools in that
toolkit. And I just wanna understand, is that
because these are US government officials? These are
also US government officials that Netanyahu You mean
Israeli officials? Sorry. Israeli government officials that you
wouldn't use, you know, are is, like, because
you can't use your So, Camilla, I would
never Exactly. I would never preview,
actions,
from up here that would,
be inappropriate not to send on mention the
toolkit. Of course. Not of course. Not in,
not just in the context of Israel, but
in any country. I wouldn't,
wouldn't preview actions from up here. Look.
When it comes to there are across the
world, when it comes to governments,
that we engage with, whether they be partners,
allies, or countries that we have adversarial relationships
with. There are,
colorful characters,
in any government. What the United States is
focused on is the policy,
and the policy decisions that, they pursue and
the United States pursue. And particularly,
one, when it comes to, attempting to subjugate
or change the status quo at, Temple Mount
Haram al Sharif,
we would take issue with that. And,
Right. Again, that's what he tweeted about. Right?
That's enough to concern yourself with. Oh my
god. The status quo is disrupted, but we'll
ignore the rape and the murder and the
starvation, and we'll let them investigate. But I'll
scream about the status quo. Expansions of a
settlement program, we would take issue with that.
We find both of these things to be
a detraction of Israel's security and fuel,
more insecurity and instability in the region. But
the Okay. I mean, think about saying that
and then looking back at the history and
seeing that that is their history.
So you if your argument is what they're
doing right now is it detracting from the
security, then their entire existence has detracted from
the security.
That's how dumb this is. It's nonstop. It's
been the reality from the beginning.
And so this just shows you the question
is always is how is it possible that
they can still be making these arguments when
everyone in the world can now see what
they're doing? What you think that is? Do
you think that's blackmail? Do you think it's
just political pressure? Do you think that they
they're all secret Zionist? Do you think that
there's some kind of other dynamic going I
mean, what is it? I don't know, but
I sure as hell know that this does
not make sense with anything we understand about
the way politics works, about the way they
pretend they're fighting for your vote.
This is simple complicity and and just obfuscating.
Right? And that's all this is. You're just
hiding it when we can clearly see that
you're doing that, which hurts your agendas, which
hurts your support, which hurts the administration clearly.
But that thing Biden's gone long since gone.
So what do you think is making this
happen? And we'll raise these and continue to
have these very tough conversations in terms of
what actions we can take. Camilla, I'm not
gonna, preview or speculate from up here. Okay.
But it's fair to say that there haven't
been any actions taken other than condemning it
verbally. When it comes to,
officials within the government, sure, that, can be
a fair assessment. Oh, that's pretty dumb. So
the point is that you keep saying that
we'll use our toolkit to push back but
all you've done is say that. So the
only tool you've used is to say that
you have tools.
Cool.
Clearly, you're really intelligent. Take,
but you have seen us particularly,
when it comes to,
actors in the West Bank, we have found
to be,
sowing division, sowing instability, sowing insecurity. We have
taken action. No. You've pretended to sanction them
and then quietly pulled it back when Smotrich
gave you a stink eye. It's all that
happened. He stood up and said don't do
that and you guys immediately pulled it back.
That's it. That's all that happened. There has
been no action against these settlers at all
other than the floating of an idea that
might happen.
And you realize how some of the worst
things, burning people alive, rape, stealing, torture, I
mean, it's terrible what's going on over there.
We're just showing you burning your houses down
in the middle of the night. This is
not Gaza, guys. This is in West Bank.
We've spoken in about that a number of
times from up here. Right. I just I
mean, I will just remark that the the
reason that these actions are being taken by
settlers in West Bank is because they do
get a green light
from said government officials to be able to
behave like that. But, again, that's, you know,
that to me, that seems linked and that's
why these questions are being asked, but I'll
leave it. Okay. Oh, good. Oh, good. You'll
leave it? Okay. Move on. Right? So it's
just, like, lays it out explicitly at the
end. So they're the ones allowing it. They're
working with them. You are saying you haven't
used your tools against them, like this roundabout
cycle, and then she says, okay. Move on.
I mean, how there's no way to misunderstand
that.
They are aware that you know what's going
on. They know that you know, And all
they're hoping for is just the least splash
as possible. Right? Oh, good. You're done? Okay.
Move on. Next question. Anything else other than
focusing on the obvious that we're letting this
happen, that we don't care.
I mean, this is I I just I
mean, in history,
if this does not reflect the reality of
what we've all seen, I mean, god, just
I don't I don't even wanna think like
that. Like, the idea that this has to
change something.
If there if
at this point in time, with how obvious
this is, with how much we can see,
we need to make something happen with this.
Let me just put it this way. We
I we are going to make a change
from this. Because at the end of the
day,
this is unstable.
We're watching them flounder about in front of
us where we all see it and the
only thing they're working with it seems is
the 2 party dynamic that gets some level
of distraction.
But I mean, again, I just we've been
saying this for the 1st month of this.
Every human rights group, every UN group, every
international, I mean, everybody everywhere is high even
their country allies are starting to 1 by
1 go away. Like, as you saw, Korea,
another place they're going, well, they're committing genocide.
I don't know how you get away from
that. I mean, I frankly, there's no way
possible. So at the old the at the,
like, the best case scenario for them, I
would argue, would be to to, like, go
after Netanyahu and just try to maintain the
problem. But I don't think that's gonna work.
So I think we as of always, there's
an open possibility here for something real to
happen, but I to bring it back to
the beginning,
cannot stop seeing how that is all there's
2 games taking place right now. There's the
obvious genocide. I shouldn't call it games, but
there's 2 manipulations.
There's the obvious genocide that they're trying to
gaslight everybody anywhere with the most flimsy allegations
and, just straight up obfuscation everywhere
to keep going for whatever gender they're trying
to accomplish. Then there's also the internal dynamics
in our countries and how they are, I
mean, pulling strings to their detriment. To the
to where they snap that string forever, but
they still are pulling that string to get
something to happen, to change the way you
were. And it's desperate because the peoples don't
buy it. The peoples of the countries are
not buying what's happening.
But we're watching them pull those strings, and
we're watching them try to influence the internal
dynamic. And my worry is that let's just
take the US example for the upcoming election
that we'll watch this potentially get driven into
some desired direction or potentially get driven into
the ground, which it seems like we all
kinda sense at this point some kind of
the the
this, manufactured chaos
to the point to where everything becomes so
dangerously chaotic that the last thing we're worried
about is what's going on on the other
side of the world. And I worried it
what that will be what happens at that
point? What power structure then takes even further
control? I'm really worried about that. So my
point is as as individuals,
if you see this and if you hear
what we're saying and this resonates with you,
reach out to people around you. If you're
a republican or or or a lib or
a democrat or rather a b conservative or
liberal, and you see the people above you
in these circles screaming falsehoods or
per like, deliberately ignoring the overlap,
call them out.
But overall, to end on the positive note,
guys, like, I believe
so
I mean, I deeply believe that we are
at a point now where
the majority,
as we saw during the COVID 19 conversation
and many other examples that I believe and
you mean you've been hearing me say this
for so long that I sense that the
majority is seeing this. And that doesn't mean
literally every part of everything, but that they
ultimately are beginning to kinda fall out of
whatever stupor we were in. All of us.
And more and more and more they're seeing
this. And I keep like, you're in the
COVID. I kept the COVID illusion. I kept
saying this. We see it. And I know
people don't wanna believe it. You talk to
the random people on the street. You don't
see it. But it's been shown in many
different ways.
Now with this conversation, I'm telling you guys
that we are
more people than I've ever seen in my
life
are pulling back and and dissecting all sorts
of different things. And I think ultimately
that this is such a great opportunity for
positive change. At the very least, what it
shows you is that us, as the peoples
of our countries,
we see through these lies.
So, at the very least, don't feel like
you're some fringe alone person in any conversation.
We have solidarity and not or rather community
and enough people to be able to effectively
push things in a direction that we believe
could positively affect far more than just our
countries. Because I think this is something global.
So at the end of the day, try
not to lose sight of the positive nature
of all this, that what we're doing is
is is, I guess, forcing them in a
direction of something that they don't want, which
I believe is positive for us. So that's
where we're getting all the negative consequences. We're
getting all the extreme political and partisan drives
and all the desperation. It's everywhere.
And I know it can be hard to
see the positive outcome, the the light at
the end of the tunnel, but we need
to focus on that.
I look around and I see a lot
of good people out there. I see a
lot of good people fighting for good things,
trying to shake people free from this and
and save human life,
to fight for empathy and compassion.
I mean, I see it everywhere. I'm just
hoping that we can see that too and
stop fixating. And, okay, I'm speaking to myself
included. Because there's times where you lose yourself
in all of this and not fixate on
the terrible and recognize all of the good
people out there, whether manipulated or not, that
truly are trying to change the world for
the better.
I just can't stop seeing the examples of
the people at the top that
I'm convinced
at the very least don't care, but are
fighting for something bad.
Whether it benefits them or not, it's everywhere.
So help me veer it in the positive
direction. Reach out to people around you that
want to have an honest engaged conversation and
consider things that they might not otherwise have
thought and have an, you know,
amicable conversation.
Build those groups. Help me fight this.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. For Israelis
who are continuing to defend the genocide in
Gaza. Do you know, like, really, do you
know
how much the world hates you? And I
don't mean hate the way like the world
hates on America, but then everybody still wants
to live here. Because I think from some
of the clips that I see on X
and on TikTok, you guys are in a
serious bubble. People who didn't even have an
opinion on Israel
a couple years ago or last year
now passionately hate you. I'm an American who
had been successfully propagandized about Israel. So if
you would have asked me a year and
a half ago what my opinion on the
country was, I would have first said, oh,
amazing, amazing place because that's where Jesus was
born. Then I also would have said, oh,
that's the place that is so wonderfully protective
of Jewish people. It was the place that
was established after the Holocaust to create a
safe haven for Jewish people. But every day,
they're still fighting anti Semitism from every country
around them. Have to live in that kind
of security because there's all these antisemitic and
racist Arabs that are always trying to kill
them. Now we're passionately against you. You ask
me now, I think it's one of the
most evil entities in modern history. And before
you come in here and try to be
a victim, I'm talking about being against the
state. You don't seem to realize how much
your actions have turned people against you. Do
you understand
that no one has made Jewish people less
safe around the world than Israel? Are you
aware of that or nah?