Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24
hours.
August 16, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Took a little bit of focused approach today.
I put off a lot of discussion around
Israel, and there there's a lot of overlap
to what we're gonna discuss regarding Israel today.
But a lot about what's going on in
regard to the ongoing genocide and some of
the updates, I put off. I'm I'm gonna
be doing the show tomorrow, and I put
this off as well as some of the
other foreign policy.
Now this definitely today relates to foreign policy.
As you guys have seen over the last
however many shows, there's clearly something
that at least I I I can see
that a lot of other people are picking
up on what I'm sensing, that we're all
sensing, but at least speaking for myself, that
I'm sensing or recognizing a a very
the same problem we've been dealing with for
a very long time with the 2 party
illusion, the politics around all of it, but
something that's
more intense
now than it has been. And I'm not
even getting into the the election in general,
but just this push around the ideology.
And I can't help but notice the time
the coordination,
excuse me, with that along with Israel's
ongoing collapse.
And I think that that is such an
obvious timeline there, and I think that it's
more than just Israel
taking advantage of what the in the influence
that it has over the United States and
seemingly all of its politicians.
I I know it's more than that, but
I'm gonna go through today the obvious nature
of these things and tie and highlight this
with some undeniable realities
of the prophetic perceptions of Israel's leadership,
of the conversation of how this has been
used in the past, the obvious and many
different connections to the border itself in this
country, the overwhelming
I mean, and I I don't even know
how anybody can deny the overwhelming evidence of
seemingly every politician we can talk about being
influenced by Israel.
And I mean to the extent of
at to the detriment of the American people.
And I think it's very shockingly obvious, and
we're gonna go over the converse the the
recent
it's it's part of Trump's
ongoing, you know, rally or rather,
campaign
presentation. I forget to think of the right
word for that, but, you know, it's going
around and having their their different rallies and
different conversations. And and it was around a
specific point of stopping anti semitism.
Co co, I guess, coordinated with Mary Matt,
Miriam Adelson, Sheldon Adelson's
wife, former sheriff Sheldon Adelson.
And I think what's alarming around all this
is the conversation that was had that maybe
wasn't expected to be so widely seen, everything
is these days, but of Donald Trump expressing
things that I think would shock
even the most
the average republican voter out there. And I
wanna go over what this shows you. And
the bigger point of today is sort of
the manufacturing
of consent in a lot of different ways.
And this is around, as I discussed in
the title, manufacture rather weaponized migration
and experimentation,
because we're gonna talk about monkeypox if if
we have time. But, generally, the idea around
all of this stuff being used to drive
you into a position where you're making choices
for the interest of the agenda. This is
not something new. It's been around for a
very long time, and that's one of the
things I keep seeing
are some of these just
classic,
long used, easily identifiable manipulations that are happening
right in front of us. And I'm wondering
if it's really just that it's this
collate there's this lacking of influence, whether it's
from the United States or anybody else where
I mean, like, where I'm perceiving this as
the influence coming from outside. But my point
being from you know, maybe we're being manipulated
to the point that the majority is there.
I'm not saying this as clear as I
should, but my point is I've always talked
about the majority,
the silent majority, the reality during COVID 19
that we all saw that.
They were desperate to make it partisan for
obvious reasons, but I don't think that was
the case. And people challenged me, and and
I could've been wrong. But I see the
same thing building after every conversation right now
more than ever with what's going on with
Israel.
The part I'll get into tomorrow is just
an obvious
growing
reality from left and right and middle and
everyone that's aware of the illusion
generally seeing what Israel truly is. And it's
not about all Israelis or all Jews, but
the Zionist government of Israel and the influence
and the tentacles around every other government that
they have. This is very obvious, and it's
not nothing to do with race other than
Zionism using different races and religions to accomplish
that. Christian Zionists are the
most prominent Zionists today.
And I think what's what's important to see
is that this might be the overreaction
to the fact that people are just seeing
all of this. And the reason I'm saying
that is because what I'm we're hoping at
the very least is that all of this
is that reaction, and it's not really the
fact that
people are just as susceptible to such basic
manipulations.
I don't want to believe that. I like
to believe that the average person out there
is smarter than they like to give us
credit for. The average person out there is
more compassionate than they like to give us
credit for. I believe that. So today,
keep that in mind that it could be
either or, the reality being that it might
be that this is so desperate because people
are really seeing through it and the the
machine is trying to keep you from recognizing
that, or it could be somewhere in the
middle. That's why I'm gonna hope it's not
the opposite of that, but that it's just
so overwhelming because this is an important time
frame. It may actually be the most important
election of our lifetime for them, not for
you. It's just one more example of another,
you know,
bastardized election system that does not translate to
the outcome, which I've been saying from the
very beginning.
But today, the main point
about the UK, about the United States, all
of this conversation of web of of illegal
immigration and this this such
classic
division tactic that we're seeing in front of
us. And this is not to say that
the immigration that we're seeing is not there
or that it's not important. I've never said
that. In fact, I think the opposite. But
it's that these things are being used. They
are real. These are real people. But that
doesn't mean because they are there that they
embody everything that the narrative is presenting for
you, that they're all you know, the it's
this it's I was just talking about this
this morning. As far back as you wanna
look, what and and the one of the
tactics that are used,
Just let's just say African Americans going back
to Jim Crow era and the idea being
that they're gonna come and they're gonna rape
your women. Right? They're gonna take from you.
They're gonna take your jobs. They're gonna take
your now of course, is there some element
of that that exists? Always. In any dynamic,
with any race or religion, you'll find a
bad person in there that might do those
things. The point though is that that's always
weaponized against the unwitting person. To think that
every one of them are that's just who
they are. That's how they were raised. That's
what they all think. Can we not see
the same hallmarks in every historical conversation
Israel's doing at the Palestinians right now? The
the west is seemingly collectively on some parts
of the political spectrum doing it to just
any immigrant in any conversation?
You will find levels of this. Both the
reality of just those bad people that exist
and also the larger part, the the weaponization
of that. Whether that means planting people in
these groups or flooding it with group people
that are already willing to take advantage of
a system because maybe their house was destroyed.
Maybe they were displaced from where they live.
Maybe they watched their family get bombed in
front of them. And so maybe they are
going here to take advantage. The point is
there's a much bigger story than just they're
coming to take from you because they don't
want to. They hate you because of your
freedom or whatever nonsensical
binary
platitude or whatever you wanna call it. Just
the things they shove down your throat to
get you mindlessly marching forward in the direction
of their agenda.
That's what's important to think about today. And,
of course, the digital ID, the technology,
the all the, the peripheral, if not main
agendas around all of this. I frankly can't
help but see how clearly it's being used
to keep your attention
anywhere. But the most disgusting thing I've ever
had to watch in my life, the the
genocide ongoing against the Palestinian people
that might I mean, I'm I'm willing to
argue that this is the most
what's the most what's the best word to
use?
This is not not just the worst genocide
in history,
but the
I mean, let's just lay there's so many
words you could use, but I think that
sums it up. And it's not necessarily because
of how many people were killed to compare
it to other numbers, but because of the
space, because of the time frame, because of
the amount of munitions used, because of the
narrative around all of it that wants you
to believe that it's just.
It's not just happening. It's just. And we're
doing the right thing and we're defending ourselves,
not to get too far off into that.
But there is a very clear overlap to
Israel in this conversation today that we cannot
get away from. That does have to do
with my opinion, but also a lot of
the facts that back it up. At the
very least, just one part of this that
we can verify
making this happen,
driving the kind of things we're seeing in
the UK in the United States. And we
can prove this to some degree. I frankly
think it's by and large
the both the Israel, US, UK kind of
apparatus overlap that's much bigger than just that.
But I think
we have to see the fingerprints all over
this. I'm gonna start today with a smaller,
I mean, unrelated story, but I find it
in a car honestly, I just find it
interesting. But I think it it it really
does go to manufacturing consent and how easy
it is to come out with a pretty
damn clumsy story if you ask me. Just
lazy.
But it'll
work. Some people will be tricked by this.
Some people even if you know like me
that it is I mean, I shouldn't say
no, but that I feel it's a fake
story.
It's still gonna be in my mind. I'll
still think about it when I eat some
candy, and we'll talk about this in a
second.
But my point is that we're gonna go
through some of these to start that are,
you know, just getting your mind in this
for a certain conversation, and then we're gonna
go into some conversation of the left, 2
party the right, 2 party illusion, Donald Trump,
the election, the recent conversation, Twitter, Elon Musk,
and and, you know, the whole big roundabout
conversation.
So let's start here.
Oh, I forgot I did include this as
well. Same kinda point. Manufacturing consent conversation.
I wanted to ask you guys this since
I have never really addressed this. And I
haven't seen anybody else at least not you
know, I'm sure it's out there, but I
haven't seen it. They made this big point
about stopping using hashtags. Right? That you'll you'll
that well, before we get into the their
justification for it. That just people got pressured
or rather just influenced to stop using them.
And I've been I've never stopped just because
I don't I'm not usually wanting to sway
with the way things are going. I've just
been using them, and I think they logically
make sense because you can hit the hashtag
and look at what other people have said
around the conversation if they've also put a
hashtag? Like, doesn't that just seem like the
most obvious useful tool? But weirdly enough,
Elon comes around, and they start making all
these changes that clearly
add to the ability to hide the manipulations
from you, like I'll point out in a
minute about the likes removing the ability to
see their bot campaigns.
Even though it was already available to do
it if you wanted, they then shoved it
forward and said, now you can't see the
likes. And Censored Man pointed out that that
had made it very I mean, you were
no longer able to identify the bots. The
point here is they suddenly said, well, don't
use hashtags. And then eventually they said, well,
it'll reduce your reach or it'll reduce the
you know, it'll we'll I don't know if
they said explicitly that they will sub, suppress
the reach, but it's pretty roundly acknowledged that
if you put hashtags, you won't get as
much reach. Why does that even remotely make
sense? If anybody wants to explain that to
me, I'd love to hear it. Personally, I
think I know what it is. It's because
it stops overlapping
information.
So you so this without the hashtag overlap,
or at least most people stopping doing it,
there's you don't get the cross information. You
don't get the you can't hit that hashtag
and look at what everybody else is saying
and what their other opinions might be. You
get sucked into the Twitter files version of
what they want you to see today. And
I'm gonna make a big point about this
with this ridiculous
list going around of all the, like, seemingly
of the most ridiculous cartoonish fake journalists out
there. A few of them I think are
pretty are okay.
But we'll go into why it's just this
crazy thing. The biggest truth tellers of today
when all their like, these are, like, some
of the worst, like, cartoonish people that I
could point to. Objectively so. Routinely wrong about
big things. But who cares? Because Twitter files
and this is the team and I think
it's important to think about. But my point
is that I find that strange. And I
wanted to think about why things like this
are happening.
It's this it's in the manufacturing consent conversation.
I was looking at this and I'm realizing
how few people are actually even using these
hashtags anymore.
And I think it's all about coordinating.
You know, creating choke points, coordinating the flow
of information.
I think that's very obvious. And I just
wanted to point that out. I'd love to
hear your guys thoughts on that in the
chat or elsewhere because I'm find these things
very surreptitious.
Now this is what the video I was
talking about. Censored man post this and this
is a strange story. I mean frankly, before
you even watch it, I I really don't
like to normally flavor, you know, what you
should think about it. But I find this
to be like,
do you work to use the word I
just did, cartoonish.
You'll see what I mean. I find this
almost impossible to believe that this is the
way it went down and I'll give you
my thoughts why afterward. Here are a food
bank in New Zealand accidentally gave out candy
laced with meth.
It's it's a real story. Whether it actually
happened, I'm even questioning. But apparently, they it
did. It was rounded roundly reported.
I'll read that afterward. Here's here's the clip.
Bank has apologized after accidentally giving out sweets
containing meth. We received an alert of concern
by a food parcel recipient
who said that they had tried funny tasting
lollies.
Auckland City Mission in New Zealand said the
pineapple flavored sweets were anonymously donated to the
charity, and they might have handed them out
to 400 people.
Each meth filled candy is believed to contain
300 times the amount of methamphetamine
someone would usually take and have a street
value of around £470
apiece.
So in other words, a deadly dose which
is not what happened to people that apparently
tasted them. So that's one reason I'm like,
what? That doesn't make sense. 300 times At
least 3 people include the normal dose? That's
that's ridiculous. That's death, without question.
But people tasted them and didn't die. So
maybe they have to eat the whole thing,
maybe that's what they mean. Just a lot
about this seems very strange. A child were
treated in hospital before being discharged. A child.
Right? You're gonna tell me this thing has
300 times the amount of meth for one
use and a child eats this and then
they just are okay? I guess so. Mean,
that whole point is not even whether it's
fake, but something in there tells me this
thing is, like, literally manufactured from whole cloth.
The sweet has the label of the Malaysian
brand Rinder, who said in a statement they
want to make it clear that Rinder Food
Industries do not use or condone
the use of illegal drugs in their products
and will cooperate with authorities.
That's that whole dumb thing where if you
don't come out and say that, you think
that they do? Yeah. Why are we this
dumb? Like, Trump didn't condemn the bad thing.
He must like it. We just we're really
ridiculous that way. This this if they say
this is what we shouldn't do, then we
must do the opposite. Oh, they said Trump's
the bad guy. He must be the hero.
It's this game that aimed at the right
more than ever right now. It happened to
the left during COVID. It's the same kind
of thing where we pretend that the opposite
of what they want is the truth. It's
like this if I could speak in that
lowercase, uppercase, lowercase, uppercase kind of way, that's
what I'm doing right now. This ridiculous thing
where we've gone back to, like, we've progressed,
like, the most ridiculous level of propaganda.
We just assume the opposite. It's so silly.
Like, they can't think that far ahead. What
I'm saying is, like, so the company has
to come out and be like,
we
said we don't use drugs in our candy.
So make make sure you know that. It's
like, well, duh. Nobody assume I mean, it's
funny to me. But anyway, the point about
this,
do we really believe that this is what
would be
that they accidentally
like, I mean, just think this through for
half a second. So how would this possibly
accidentally happen? So either this is, 1, completely
manufactured,
whether it's I I I used to make
this point a lot around the the game
of Halloween
where every year it's remember when we were
kids it was razor blades in your candy
which I don't think anybody I've ever known,
anywhere in the world has ever seen that,
but we get told that. It's certainly possible.
But I find it to be something more
about just control and fear and so on.
Then eventually it changed into something else. And
then it was drugs. Or no, now today
it's the cannabis. Because that's much more likely.
Even I would even argue easily possible because
you just get them mixed up. Right? Or
something falls in or whatever. My point though
is it's always about and and on that
point though, even a child, you're not gonna
die from cannabis candies as much as they
wanna hype that. It is not the case.
As I'll take Willie Nelson's joke, the only
way cannabis is gonna kill you is the
pound if it falls in your head. This
is easily verifiable with the actual science, but
they'll screech, ask Alec Alex Burninson. He'll lie
about it all day long. It's can oh,
cannabis. But the point
is that I don't believe
that this even actually would have happened this
way. Right? That they that the the what
I was saying is that they would be
pushing this coming up to Halloween soon to
get the hype going, I guess, but that's
the thought. But so they're gonna pretend that
these candies went out, like, through the through
the factory?
So that means that they got wrapped, so
that means that it was inside, so that
means somebody in the factory had to have
done. I mean, that's the only way you
can logically break this down. Not maybe they
work for them, maybe they were in the
factory. The reason I'm saying this is because
the the what they say in there is
the amount of money, I forget off the
top of my head now, you just heard
it, is a lot of money.
That's a lot of money. So So you're
gonna tell me that some random person's gonna
do this so they can just go home
and laugh about how that thing happened? They
don't get to see it happen.
I just don't buy for a second to
to belabor the point that anybody would spend
that much money to put drugs that they're
not gonna be able to use or they're
not gonna get to see affected out in
there just to go, I did that thing
and sit at home and laugh about it.
That's crazy and, frankly, I don't believe it's
ever possible.
I mean, it's obviously possible, but the idea
that that would happen, I find that so
like, there must be another motive. Somebody made
them do it. They paid them to do
it. Whatever. Or let's just say, here's another
logical possibility. The the candy company's rival
paid someone to do it. That would make
sense. All of that is to say that
things like this, we need to question
Or everything.
You know, the old saying?
Question everything. I just want us to keep
our minds in that place. With stories like
this that are so weird,
to me it just shows you that there's
a missing component. That's all we need to
leave it at. Something doesn't add up here.
And if we don't find anything new, then
we leave it there. But the point is
that we need to have our minds in
that constant stay vigilant
perspective, where every story that comes around, whether
it lines up with what we want to
believe or whether it makes our chosen ideologue
look like the hero, whatever it is, question
it. Break it down. Go, does that really
make sense? Would Trump really say that? Would
Biden actually do that? Is Kamala really that
smart? Ask the questions.
This person says, this was no accident.
He wanted to test their new drugs on
kids and see how they would react. Well,
that's actually a very valid and possible suggestion.
Of course, the high minded journalist in the
world will tell you a conspiracy theorist for
asking something as logical as that that's clearly
happened in the past, but, you know, crazy.
But the point on that is to segue
into the next possibility, and this is the
idea that these, you know, that we're being
tested on. That's just as likely as anything
else. It really is.
So let's take this to the next point,
that this has happened before. I mean, in
really dark ways. Not just putting something in
candy or, you know, spraying something over the
San Francisco Bay, Operation Sea Spray, to see
whether people would die, and one of them
did.
Real story.
They said this is experimentation from your government
and the question I would ask right now
if we know as we do know this
is a verifiable story, I'll pull up that
article about the
239 times that they've tested on Americans unwittingly
with biological chemical,
weapons or different
aspects of it, whether this is being something
this is something being done on a larger
scale.
I don't even think we should I quite
frankly, I think you know my opinion. I
think it's a verifiable reality, whether it's spraying
in the skies or something else. And is
the question, is is that happening from other
countries
or involving other countries? Just to keep that
in your mind. Well, check this is a
story about a I think it's in the
UK.
A company
giving contaminated blood.
Well, that brings back the conversation of the
Red Cross which I'll point out in a
second since this overlaps.
But it gets darker when you find out
that they did it on purpose.
You know, just to see what would happen.
You know, for science, of course. This is
what your governments are. And if we can't
wrap our minds around that, the rest of
the show is not gonna make sense to
you.
Could often spent in hospital.
Richard Warwick was born with hemophilia, a blood
clotting condition.
Dozens of hemophilia children like him at Trelors
College, a specialist boarding school, were given contaminated
blood in the 19 seventies eighties.
As a result, he contracted hepatitis
and HIV.
One of many times that's happened in different
countries, by the way, and yet when we
bring up the conversation of the COVID injection
and the verifiable reality of the spike proteins
being present in the blood well after,
you're a crazy person, apparently, despite the most
valid example you could ever show. A dangerous
cytotoxic protein that we know is killing people.
Look. It's in the blood. We can prove
it. But you're crazy. Shut up. Red Cross
won't acknowledge it. Funny how it works. I
foster child because she was told to have
the baby terminated
because of the risk of HIV to the
child.
So we're never able to start a family.
30,000
people across the UK were given infected blood,
the biggest treatment disaster in NHS history.
And the other question we'd ask to ask
is, okay, what happens if we never found
out?
Think about that. Do you know how many
things that we never found out about that
happened that we just don't know about? I
don't know. Probably a lot. But otherwise, we
don't know. The reality though is that we
know that your government's actively like, if they
if we never found out about any number
of things that we've talked about, we know
as we we could prove that they would
never say anything because they weren't until we
found out. So my point is, what would
they have called that? What would they have
blamed this 30,000
strong problem?
I don't know. A new virus popping up?
Another side effect of something they wanted you
to suddenly not like anymore? I mean, this
is how these things are used. See where
you this is where it reminds you. This
is not being some conspiracy theorist. And other
than the, you know, not in the derogatory
sense. It is when you realize that is
what we should all be doing, theorizing about
how your powerful people in the world or
the governments
try to conspire against you. Whether it's because
they identify you as a problem or whether
they just you know, you could go off
on theoreticals forever. This is how they view
you. This is their own policy. You can
read it in their documents.
This game they played where you were ever
of the mind that we shouldn't be asking
these questions, that is the crazy thing.
And at at the same time, though,
you need to temper yourself to not fall
into the trap laid for you, by those
same people. We're watching it happen on Twitter
right now, where they come out and say,
you're all gonna do this. And we all
said, no. We're not. We're just gonna break
down what we think is the truth, and
we're gonna do our best to prove it.
And then guess what? They the Pied Piper
of of all the idiots out there comes
out and start driving people in the direction
of choosing to pray spread false information, choosing
to get caught lying about Venezuela. Oh, look
at that. You did exactly what they said
you would do. That's not saying what they
said. That's proving that they're making you do
that. That's how this works. Manufacturing consent, driving
you into it, social engineering.
I still believe most people on Twitter, even
if they're accidentally sharing false information, are doing
good intentions. There's a huge factor of this
that is being engineered right now. And you've
got all these people, some of them good
intentioned on the right who are desperately defending
it all because they just think that you're
doing your like with Elon or any of
the rest. We need to be able to
identify that there is misinformation. There are people
who deliberately spread misinformation,
and that's part of free speech, as I've
always said. But we can acknowledge that without
being a lefty or whatever weird game is
going on in your mind. So this is
what we always need to think about. Right?
How they're playing these things against us and
what they would do if we never actually
found out the reality. Like, right now with
Twitter, like I was just saying.
What if we never truly find out what's
going on behind the scenes even though I
think we can all see it? Well, you
you'll get set a narrative and you'll believe
it for the rest of your life because
that's how they will they want you to
anyway.
But what happened at Trelors College was even
more shocking because the children were deliberately given
infected blood as part of an experiment.
Deliberate After decades of campaigns, the government says
it will now speed up compensation.
The Oh, great. So you had to beg
them for years to just speed up what
they said you deserved.
Cool.
No. No. No. Nobody went to jail though,
right? Oops. We accidentally deliberately experimented on you.
Here's a little bit of money but you'll
wait 5 years or longer.
I mean, how do you even how do
we we oh, it's you can't even laugh
about that. Like, it's like we should cry
about how horrifying that is. And this is
just another story in the background.
You could talk about glyphosate, you could talk
about an endocrine disrupting chemicals, talk about,
PFAS,
dioxins.
I mean, it could go on forever.
All over the world. How about the COVID
19 injection? Right? Just a thousands of these
examples. But yet, we're gonna pretend that those
very same people, many of which are all
on Trump's Elon side, but they're the government.
You know, I hope you always hear me
when I'm talking about this, that I see
them all as one thing. So when you
people try to pretend that we're being partisan
and focusing on one side or the other,
I'm just highlighting the problem in the moment.
I see Trump and Biden, Kamala as all
a part of your government who are trying
to manipulate you. That's what I see them
as. That's the same thing. No matter how
you look at it, they're all trying to
play you, and they're doing a good job
for some people out there. That includes lifetime
support payments for all victims,
an extra £10,000
for people used for research without their knowledge,
and an extra £15,000
for the former pupils in the notorious Trello's
case. Oh, good. So that's what it's worth.
Right? Your child potentially being murdered in an
experimentation
process, $15,000.
Good to know what that's worth. For Richard,
it's not enough. They would test
these known infected batches
on children
just to see how quickly they would
get the diseases.
£15,000
is not only
insulting,
but it's derisory.
The multibillion pound scheme aims to begin payments
by the end of the year, but time
is running out. Of Richard's a 120 school
friends, less than 30 have survived.
Galdi Patel, good morning, Britain.
Right. So by the time their parents get
the 15 grand for their for the child
to be dead, no one goes to jail.
That's the reality. So what the point is
we're living through that right now.
We've talked about this a lot.
Here's the blood cross, the blood cross, the
red
cross. This is still I still this still
to this day blows me away.
I believe we were one of the first
to highlight this. We were not the first,
I believe somebody sent this to me. But
we were one of the earliest to really
kinda ring this bell and constantly stay on
this. But there's a lot of people out
there that were trying you know, some brought
this to my attention.
We don't label blood products as containing vaccinated
or unvaccinated blood, it reads from the Twitter
account for the podcast, from the American Red
Cross, as it says, the blood the COVID
19 vaccine does not enter the bloodstream.
Well, we we know as a matter of
fact that's not true. In fact, as I've
shown a 100 times now, I've literally posted
2 peer reviewed studies, one from the NIH
National Library of Medicine and another from nature.com.
I think actually technically 3. Now I take
it back. There's 3 or 4 now. I
forget how many times I've done this. All
of which prove
beyond a shadow of a doubt that it
does enter your bloodstream. Many of them that
show that it goes on at least for
30 days or more.
And I simply said, this this is what
I've con constantly tagged them on. Yet another
peer reviewed study finds that you are wrong.
How is it that we can know this
and yet you're still standing by that statement?
You're putting people in danger. You know
they've seen this,
especially because I'm constantly over here retweeting it.
It's almost got a 1,000 likes on it.
They've seen this, guys. You know they have.
On top of that, we're either just the
point that means that they know that they're
hiding that. How else do you take that?
Do you know how much has come out
proving that the thing doesn't the spike protein
doesn't stay in your shoulder muscle? That that
was debunked a long time ago and yet
their policy on their website is still the
same. We just recently covered this again.
Now the reason I I reason I brought
this up is because of that blood story,
but I'll I'll show you this since somebody
sent this to me recently.
Oh, and this is just my tweet about
it.
Jan shared this tagging me. Apparently,
Alex broke the news about the blood the
Red Cross blood donation form, which is exactly
the the the form that we went through
in the breakdown, which go glad people are
covering it. But he says,
TLAB Ryan nailed the blood bank contamination early
very early. And this is Wall Street Ape
saying, we tried to to warn everybody. Alex
Jones reveals the blood cross donation form that
you've had in the vaccine may be ineligible
and really, to be quite honest, frames this
in a very inaccurate way personally, but here's
what he says.
Q79.
Have you ever had a coronavirus
COVID 19 vaccine? Yes, no, skip.
If the answer is yes, the question, please
call 1800 Red Cross
before coming to donate and determine if this
will affect your eligibility.
So they're saying if you've had the vaccine,
it affects your eligibility.
Yep.
And then it just breaks down. This is
the same stuff we've been through many, many,
many times.
It's important to know. Now if you wanna
get more on this, we you can break
it down going back to this one's from
February 2024. That was the newer one. This
is from February, September, 2022.
I mean, it goes even before that. And
I I think in one of these I
have the video where I literally it's a
well, it's a it's a audio but I
put the video background for Red Cross where
I call them. I have them on the
record in the midst of this, not now
after all this time where they've edited. And
in one of these shows I've got, like,
the different edited time stamps from the different
way back machine of every day and they
changed it many times. And I have them
on the record admitting that this is a
problem, that they know what it does. And
we also have these old clips by the
way that we played, I don't even know
how many times where it there's there's a
brief moment where this was reported on the
corporate media. In fact, it was this as
well as that Pfizer guy who admitted this,
and then they had to make him walk
it back, but this was on corporate media.
Your COVID 19 vaccine. You're gonna wanna listen
to this. The Red Cross says anyone who
has received their COVID 19 vaccine cannot donate
convalescent
plasma to help other COVID 19 patients in
hospitals.
That plasma is made up of antibodies from
people who have recovered from the virus, but
the vaccine wipes out those antibodies, making the
convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other COVID 19
patients.
Yep. So I'll include both of these for
you. So my point is we're living through
this right now. They just ignore it. They
put it away. We have to, I guess,
wait 10 years for it to finally come
back around because it suits their interest to
make this happen for some reason, and then
here's 10 grand, shut up. Well, that's that's
the world we live in unless we want
to change that. And the ideologues out there
desperate to maintain the 2 party illusion are
not gonna change that. Seems pretty obvious to
me. I hope we can agree. But here
are these two articles. Red Cross still claims
COVID jab is not in the bloodstream, and
this is the newer one or the older
one, excuse me, vaxxed Red Cross blood donations.
That was the point he was highlighting.
Now this was circulating. I'm only gonna make
a quick point on this. These these are
all still kinda these opening points that I
are related, but they're more tangential.
I saw this going
around, and I'll show you why I'm hesitant
to even bring it up. It's so this
is Los Angeles Times, I saw it on
a lot of platforms.
This is reported all over the partisan media
as this is what happened,
and it seems like it I mean, for
all it probably did. I frankly, I don't
think any of this stuff is as secure
as they claim it is. On top of
that, I think it's because they want these
things to be manipulated so they can then
go, look, we need to reimagine the whole
system. We all see that happening.
When and my question is whether this even
happened or whether it was allowed to happen,
but it says hackers may have stolen social
security numbers of every American.
But if you read this read this, it's
not all of them,
and there's a lot of back and forth
about
read it for yourself. First, I just think
the obvious point here is that this is
about trying to justify the Americans that
we're not secure. We need
digital this and digital IDs, and it's all
the same stuff. And, look, even if you
don't think that's why this happened or it's
manufactured,
that is the solution. Read it for yourself.
They're all aiming in that direction, and we
should be concerned about that.
But I asked this just, you know, the
the little social media thing,
and it says and this is in the
article too. No so no Social Security Administration
oh, excuse me. The Social Security Administration has
not officially confirmed the breach or the number
of affected individuals.
Okay. So I saw that. I'm like, okay.
So this is a it's could or may.
But if they have yet to confirm it,
they could be hiding it. Obviously, that's certainly
one of the possibilities because they don't want
to be seen as but for me, the
way this all seems to go is they
clearly want us talking about this. They want
this to be a thing where we're worried
and we want the solution which they're in
the wings waiting with. That's how I would
see it. But since it says they haven't
even confirmed that it even happened or let
alone how many, I think we should leave
it there. But you wanna listen to a
lot of people hype about where this is
gonna do, then there's a lot of partisan
talk out there. But I find this to
be about
driving us in this direction. Right? Your personal
information is just not secure. We need a
better solution. And then, sure, they'll be there
with it. They're waiting.
Now this I'm on this side note. I
wanted to highlight this. I thought this was
interesting.
The there's all these, like, I and I'm
very resistant.
Only recently have I started using some of
these AI, you know, you ask AI on,
like, the on Brave, let alone many of
them
just to see what you
get. And sometimes you get some interesting points
and you they always give the source material
at the bottom, at least on Brave. So
I like that. But I just don't like
using these things. I don't I I know
I'm and maybe I'll be the guy resisting.
I mean, I'm I'm not gonna get any
pushback here. I think we think we're all
very worried about where this is going.
Nonetheless, I I I thought this was interesting.
So I typed this in to see what
it would give for for for for Ryan,
my myself, and to see what that would
say. And weirdly enough, it popped up with
not only me,
but with my home address
and my office number.
And I thought that was pretty strange. So
I think one thing we should recognize is
that this thing is definitely
there's it can scrape information out there from
damn near anywhere. So I think that's important
to recognize, that this stuff is
that is the kind of world we're stepping
into, where if it's out there, it can
be scraped and it's gonna be utilized.
So I don't know why we'd wanna lean
that lean into that anymore. Then I looked
at Grok, which I thought was interesting.
I'm actually kinda blown away by what this
says about me because this I mean, I
guess I'm I shouldn't assume that just because
it's Twitter or whatever that it's gonna be,
like,
negative or I don't know. But look at
what this says about me. And I've been
very kind to him, actually. It says, Ryan
Christian in the Tennessee,
troubadour of the truth, apparently says, as some
might call him, the vagabond of veracity. He
says, here's what the digital winds have whispered
about him. Last American Vagabond. It says, Ryan
Christian is the founder and editor of this
platform, which has become a beacon for those
seeking news that's not just served with a
side of corporate sauce. His work has been
recognized for diving deep into topics where others
might fear to tread,
earning him the title of hero of the
week by some who appreciate his commitment to
unsolicited information. Where the hell is all of
that?
You guys, I mean, you guys and the
point is I find it funny that this
can be so broadly scooped up and it's
like, this guy is the one people look
to. One of these things called me the
oracle of information.
It's like it's just like it's crazy to
me that that's can be the way this
is framing me, but yet I we get
boxed out from just about every major platform
with no advert. I just think it's interesting.
It's sort of like how we have this
crazy reach that we can prove, but yet
we get suppressed and censored on every platform.
I don't know. It speaks for itself, I
think. But it says a man of many
hats. Oh, and then it overlaps by the
way with,
oh, no. It does say from discussing intricacies
of weather modification to hosting podcasts that delve
into everything from privacy devices to geopolitical chessboard.
It says his platform isn't just about news.
It's all about community engagement, fighting for what
he believes in. It's it's I like what
it's saying. I I still am very resistant
and adverse to just all of this stuff
but I find it interesting.
If you're looking for Ryan you might find
him not just in Tennessee but also in
the digital realm.
This one then overlaps I just I just
did Ryan in general and it overlaps with
this,
sports, where there's people with Ryan that play
football and boxing and stuff. Anyway, I thought
that was interesting. I wanted your guys' thoughts
on where this is all going with the
training of AI. Because I'm not using, especially
Twitter, because I don't like the way that
these things are being used against us. Not
just in the sense that there there were
literally training these devices and these tools to
be used against us in my personal opinion.
But it's strange, isn't it? I wouldn't expect
this to frame it this way. I'm I'm
not
viewed positively from either side of the paradigm.
So I don't know. What are your guys'
thoughts on that?
Now let's talk about,
in the same vein of conversation,
am manufacturing consent,
the
overlap of Twitter, as well as the Trump
sphere, like, all of this kind of building
into the election conversation,
this is about Trump's assassination attempt.
Now my whole point here,
I that I've said many times, that I
believe pretty strongly that the right, right now
more than anything, is being manipulated.
I mean, the 2 party paradigm as an
as a constant reality is being played and
manipulated and being socially engineered. We're all under
that
or
that gaze, I guess.
But right now more than ever,
I can't stop seeing how obviously the right
is being driven into the position that I
think the left was pushed into during COVID
19.
And so what I think is interesting here,
not only the obvious weirdness of the whole
thing, you know, oh, look, he doesn't have
an injury around his ear after 12 days.
Like, why don't we all think that's shockingly
ridiculous, but my, you know, that makes me
a conspiracy theorist apparently to point out, like,
an obvious biological reality.
And And again, I don't even know what
I think that means. I'm not suggesting I
think it was all fake. I just think
there's something very weird where we can't collectively
it's like not being able to acknowledge that
we're like that it's daylight outside. It's just
like this what how are we actually pretending
that it's not the most anyway, this this
is interesting to me. It only adds to
the weirdness of this. So if the whole
game is that, you know, that the
the left is try either tried to assassinate
him or the or the deep state or
the argument we from a lot of it
would be that the right is, you know,
the at least some of them are sort
of the ones trying to fight for this
good direction. I don't know how the paradigm
perceives it right now. Whatever you look at
it as, this I find interesting, that a
republican
apparently
or, actually, it will not know that this
is released by so congressman Clay Higgins released
his preliminary investigative report on the attempted assassination
of Donald Trump. He states that the FBI
scrubbed the crime scene.
So the FBI.
Nonetheless, I find it interesting
the way that this all goes down.
Like, to me,
obviously, this could mean that he was
they tried to take him out, and they're
trying to cover it up. That's certainly one
of the ways this could be seen.
But on top of that,
to me, it is more indicative of the
fact that this is
something big I mean, there's I like, for
if what's I guess what I'm trying to
say is that from the right perspective,
this seems like almost the larger,
upper echelon of the Republican side of this
have just taken the the basic like, they're
the ones putting up the basic
official narrative, as it were. Maybe with a
little bit of sort of, like, maybe they
let it happen because they don't like Trump.
But the narrative is basically the official narrative,
all of the information which came through the
FBI.
And so if this is the way it
went down afterward, which is that they cremated
his body in a weird time frame that
makes it seem like they're hiding something, how
does that line up with that perspective?
You get what I'm saying? Like, so it's
just this weird to me, it seems like
the paradigm like, it's not left versus right
in this, like always. There's something very fishy
about the way this all went down. I
think we all sense that. But I caution
us from leaning into one side or the
other because I think this is about the
entirety of our government trying to manipulate, whatever
the outcome really was.
I mean, I still I honestly don't know
where I land with this because there's so
much misinformation
from all sides of this. Inconsistencies,
lies.
Think just from but anyway, I this is
one of the most odd stories I've ever
covered because it just seems like the more
it goes forward, the more it is getting
buried in,
you know,
new theories,
conflicting information
from all sides of this, even directly from
the FBI, directly from the Secret Service. It's
so strange. Now to this explicitly, it says
oh, actually, I forgot I have this up
right here. This is, this is directly from
the report itself.
Let's see. Page 5, Sears at the top.
Congress of the United States
preliminary report.
Just the one part I wanted to show
you. It says, my effort to examine Crook's
body on Monday, August 5th caused quite a
stir and revealed, excuse me, that a a
disturbing fact. The FBI released the body for
cremation
10 days
after 13th.
Now, you guys tell me, is that normal?
When the ongoing the investigation is still ongoing,
I find it near impossible to believe that
they would decide to cremate the body of
all things when there's still an ongoing investigation.
Like, even if you feel like you've established
you know, you've done your autopsy and so
on. That it's still a piece of evidence
that still may end up becoming more relevant.
When you cremate it, you stop that. To
me, that's crazy.
On on 23rd,
Crooks was gone, it says. Nobody knew the
this until Monday, August 5th,
including
the county coroner,
law enforcement, sheriff, etcetera.
It says, yes. Butler County coroner technically had
legal authority over the body, but I spoke
with the coroner and he would have never
released Crook's body to the family or for
cremation or burial without specific permission from the
FBI.
The coroner's report and autopsy report are both
late, it says, as of Monday, August 5th.
They were a week late. The problem with
me not being able to examine
being able to examine the actual body is
is that I don't know
100% if the coroner's report and the autopsy
report are accurate.
Now, of course, that would be called conspiracy
theory by this by either side who wants
to call it that. Remember, we saw during
this, the right start calling you conspiracy theorists
for saying things around Trump's assassination. How funny
that is when it's something they don't want
you looking at, suddenly you're a conspiracy theorist.
My point is that we should always be
able to ask, why wouldn't we question that?
Just because the CDC says something or the
White House says it doesn't mean that it
should be blindly taken at face value, but
that's what the certain journalist class wants you
to think in some cases. Well, the autopsy
wouldn't lie. Well, of course they would or
could. Somebody could easily pressure them. They could
bribe them. So his point is accurate, of
course, but you don't know whether it'll be
looked at a certain way. And he says,
we will actually never know, which is right.
Yes. We'll get the reports and pictures, etcetera,
but I will not wait. I guess the
point to make is that's always the case,
isn't it? Just because he wanted to look
now does not suddenly my point is that
you could get any coroner's report and say,
well, we don't know if that's true. And
you're right.
See, that's what bothers some people is that
they will go, well, you can't roast anything
then. Well, yeah. That's correct. It doesn't mean
you disregard everything, but you find a logical,
intelligent balance where you recognize that, yes, I
can look at the coroner's report or any
other report like that and recognize that it
could also be false, or he could be
misinformed, or he could've made a mistake. That's
just called logic.
Anyway, it goes forward in saying,
again, similar to releasing the crime scene and
scrubbing crime scene biological evidence, this action by
the FBI can only be described by any
reasonable man as an obstruction to any following
investigation.
I I don't know how I can disagree
with that. Isn't it? I find too, I
find this pretty wild. But it's is it
any different than just about any other thing
we've covered? Lahaina?
East Palestine?
It's just it's only seen differently, different lens,
because it's kinda the left versus the right.
As opposed to just the left or the
right being kinda in control of the cover
up. Right? It's this I just find this
to be no different. And I what it
tells me is that there is something that
went down here that we and we really
don't know. I have a lot of theories.
Sure. We went over them during our coverage,
but I feel like it's gonna be stuck
there. That tells me that something happened.
Now, the the I wanted to show this
because of what teachers for choice said, but
I'll since it's coming off of Brad Miller's
tweet, here's what he said. And I completely
agree with him by the way.
That that,
pretty ridiculous,
Twitter Twitter spaces with Trump and Elon,
which again, you know, for those that may
just be tuning in, it it would be
ridiculous if it was e Kamala Harris and
Elon just like it's ridiculous if it was
Trump and Elon.
And the point is that all of them
are ridiculous
in this. Trump was the typical Trump, his
rambling,
non answers, and kind of and I gotta
be honest, I found what he the way
he described the shooting to be very suspicious.
Very You listen for yourselves, not from a
partisan lens, and you It's You know, either
way that is, which means you don't either
come out from a left lens thinking that
everything he says is criminal, or the right
word nothing is. If you listen to it
objectively, it's very weird.
Very weird the way he goes about it.
And that's what I'll go to the, comment
from teacher's choice. But he says, Brad Miller,
the Elon Trump conversation was boring as hell.
It was. And Elon's a terrible interviewer. He
just is. He stutters a lot. He doesn't
make clear points. But he says, I'm no
fan of either, so I wasn't expecting to
be impressed. Yet it was still worse than
I expected. And the this is objective.
The right will wanna make you out to
be some secret lefty for saying that, but
look. These these are I know Brad. We've
interviewed him in this room.
He is a nonpartisan person, And we collectively
have the same kind of perspective on, you
know, rather we we share the same perspective
on just collectively all politicians,
for the most part.
So it says Trump speaks almost entirely
in vague abstraction. That's just what he does.
Because he allows people that's my point about
right down the middle. You'll read it into
it what you want from it. And it
says, and childish hyperbole, that's all he does.
There's never a sense of nuance or complexity
in any of his ideas whatsoever. Elon's portion
was also totally empty of substance. That's what
they do.
And it says, Elon cares about free speech
about as much as Trump cares about his
fellow Americans.
But Brad's or rather teachers for choice says
and this is what I did pick up
out of it. He says this many times.
He said, it blows me away that Trump
still says the bullet hit his ear hard.
It hit hard. He says it a lot.
And that there was a lot of blood.
Both statements are easily proven false, but he
could care less.
I find this strange because what was my
first point?
That I know ear ear injuries bleed a
lot. You know? And you guys all saw
how much how many ridiculous, screaming, blind followers
were first to say, you're wrong.
Not if it's here. Not if it's there.
No. You're wrong. Here's a study that shows
blah blah blah. They were wrong. I knew
it because I've seen it myself and I've
watched it. But yet, then weirdly what happens,
Trump comes
out and goes, yeah. Oh, I heard the
ear rangers bleed a lot. It was bleeding
everywhere. He says that in damn near every
interview he talked about it. Oh, then those
people suddenly got quiet. Oh, whoops. Ryan was
right, but we're gonna pretend like it's just
so silly how partisanship acts.
It's childish.
They only wanted to defend what they thought
was the narrative. And when he shifted it,
they go to that, they go there, and
then they stopped, they just ignore it. But
the point is it didn't bleed a lot.
We all saw that. Whether they wipe some
off or not, it was not a lot.
So it's it is strange. It's it's just
a passing point to show you that there's
something off about this.
Very very clearly. I still if I had
to just pick and I my point is
I don't think I know at all where
this really ends up. But it seems like
this was a coordinated effort against all of
us
involving somebody clearly, involving a lot of different
angles, but clearly, I think this involves something
from outside this country. You guys can decide
for yourselves.
Now speaking of that,
main point here.
There's a lot going on in the world,
and we're seeing this kind of explosion
or, really, just kind of like like this
we've, like, digressed back into this conversation
that we had a lot around the caravans
and the migration, which has always been there,
and it is a classic tactic that we've
seen used a lot.
So I really hope, at the very least,
no matter what we have, and we're gonna
go over a lot of evidence, that we
would be willing and able to question
whether this could be used,
if not manufactured,
for very clear purposes.
And then especially met that we can stand
back and acknowledge the undeniable reality that agent
provocateurs,
intelligence
apparati
is ease? How would you say that?
Intelligence
organizations around the world
take advantage of these things, especially when they
manufacture them. But if other whether or not
you've seen the and this is what we've
talked about with these, you know, military age
males and so on. The point is that,
well, this could be used.
But the idea of turning this into
they are the problem,
no matter how you view this, is pretty
disgusting.
No matter how you're viewing this, if your
idea is that they are doing this I
mean, look, the only way you could make
it their fault is if you think that
these people are doing this because they collectively
hate the UK or hate Americans, and they're
all just deciding to, what, together
in some mass coordinated thing? Which, how would
you even think that's possible?
Individuals
do this because, you know, we wanna destabilize
things. Well, that's not even the reality. From
in their conversation, they're the ones pointing at
something.
They're the ones arguing because I agree with
that point that this is being engineered.
But so if it is being engineered, how
then do you turn around and say, bad
immigrants? How do you say, it's Islam? It's
the you know, in the United States, it's
the it's the Mexican immigrant. Well, yes, there
are people that are present in there, but
you just told me that it's being engineered.
So you see what I'm saying? Like, this
it's it's weird.
I think what we're seeing in all of
these, like any other conversation,
is the same people we see, like the
Lumers of the world or like the any
number of people out there that are driving
in their hateful narratives that work for Israel,
work for the US foreign policy, that are
based on nothing but
partisan
team sport politics.
Because we can see that this there is
migration.
But if we can't stand back and recognize
that this is being used and not fold
that into the way we understand things, then
you don't want to see that. That, to
me, tells me that you have an agenda.
So Kevorka Macin, who's a very, very intelligent
person,
who I've spoken with more than once, he
runs Sirianna Analysis.
He has a really measured breakdown that I
wanna read for you guys about this very
topic, and then we're gonna go over this
video that I I just think is,
again, cartoonish.
Even the way that this person's voice sounds
I mean, everything about this is
you know, it certainly could be real,
but the way that it then gets used
online and out about like, this is the
problem. Like
well, let me let me play it first.
Let me read what he says first, and
we'll go into this. Because this is what
we're seeing, and I can prove to you
that this is being manufactured.
And so we have to think about why
this would happen, if we know that. Why
they they would make people in the UK
think this is the reality. And this again,
I can't stop seeing the obvious overlap to
what Israel's trying to accomplish, both from a
prophetic perspective, but also just destabilization for the
interest of their agenda in the Middle East.
But also, just to get people not paying
attention to what they're still doing as I'm
saying this.
But also that there's any other number of
overlaps that are involved with foreign policy of
the UK, foreign policy of the US where
they're achieving things as well. But we have
to see how this is exactly what they
want from you. They've said this publicly, and
we'll get to all the evidence.
But first,
here's what Kevork says.
He says this video, likely staged, wholeheartedly agree,
by the way, is currently being shared on
Twitter.
Allegedly filmed by illegal migrants in the UK,
which again, how would you even know that?
How do you know they're illegal? Maybe they're
just migrants.
But see, that doesn't matter. It's like with
the same thing in the United States. You
have people that are literally coming up to
the border fence, and you've got republicans calling
them illegal immigrants. They haven't even tried to
cross the fence yet. How are they illegal
if they have their just migrants at that
point? But that's the whole idea. They're all
illegal immigrants because that's become the narrative.
It's just lazy.
But it goes on to say, and I
would like to share my views on migration
and the refugee crisis in Europe.
To begin with, he says, I am a
migrant living in Europe, namely in Germany. And
my perspective on migration has evolved since my
arrival. Today, he says, I find myself positioned
between the polarized views of the so called
left
and right.
And I believe both factions are being manipulated
to foster instability in Europe. Exactly.
Having originated from a war torn Syria,
and the same point he'll make, why is
it war torn? Right? Who's driving this? What's
the outcome? That's the main point. He says,
I have witnessed firsthand the
consequences of the brutal regime change war
initiated by the United States
and its allies
in the 2 in 2,011. Allies being chiefly
the UK, Israel, and plenty of other European
allies.
He says this conflict has led to a
significant influx in refugees into Europe. That's verifiable.
Not because
fleeing for a better life, they're fleeing from
your destroyed life to anywhere better. That's the
point. It says displacing millions of desperate Syrians
whose lives have been irrevocably destroyed by the
war and the illegal sanctions opposed by western
governments that have targeted their basic means of
survival. And let's not forget the horrifying sides
well, not even a side story, but in
the moment now since it's not related to
what we're talking about,
of all the missing children from Syria. Same
thing's happening in Palestine right now. And I'm
sure we'll hear about this after the fact
as we go through the worst parts of
this. But there was a whole
series of investigations
about 1,000 of missing Syrian children that we
never that never got found.
This is this is part of what happens
every single time. And it's again, you could
argue it's the main agenda. Maybe it is.
The very least, it's one of the side
agendas where when when war happens,
there are the worst people in the world
that and you see them stoking it all
over that take advantage of that. Stealing resources,
human trafficking, drug trafficking, all of it.
So think about that now in every other
field we're talking about. In in the UK
as well, anywhere else. But he says prior
to 2,011, the term Syrian refugee was virtually
unheard of.
Additionally,
it is crucial to acknowledge that Iraq
was subjected to an illegal invasion,
occupation,
and devastation by the US and the UK
in 2003,
resulting in another wave of Iraqi refugees and
migrants seeking refuge in Europe.
Even just stopping right there, how is it
possible that we could pretend that it's their
fault that they're fleeing what your countries did
to them? Or our country. Whatever you wherever
you are in the world. Right?
I I I shouldn't I'm I'm I'm in
the con an American. I live in the
United States. So our governments. What our governments
did to them.
I mean, obviously, this is I mean, e
even if you think let's just say somebody
then left their destroyed home after watching their
children starve and their home be destroyed, and
then went into the UK or the United
States and and then acted
poorly.
And let's just even say they committed open
crimes. Well, yeah. They should be held accountable
for those crimes. That's how that works. But
we can still be objective enough to go,
well, I can understand why he might be
a little bit angry. Or especially when you
get there, and I'm not trying to rationalize
or justify any of it. It's just called
being, you know, having the wherewithal
to get why things might being happen. It's
the nuance to it. The point being that
on top of that, then we can stand
back and see whether that person might have
been there and then been called a terrorist.
Just because
he's there from another country.
Or gets attacked by other people for acting
a certain way. And now you can see
how these things happen. Or then you add
the element of other people that want them
to be seen that way, driving it into
reality. And then the average family over here
gets attacked as well. Then maybe they act
differently because they, you see how this acts?
You see how it spins out?
All stemming from what they created with a
bunch of random, innocent people. That's how we're
this is the reality of what we're talking
about. It says the situation in Afghanistan now,
to be clear, by the way, for because
I shouldn't even try to address the people
out there that I know would be coming
at this from a dishonest angle. But let's
just say, for example, the worst situation we're
talking about. Let's you know, women being raped,
terror things, murder.
There's no justification
for that, Whether it's Israel doing it for
fun in Gaza or a random migrant doing
it because he's angry, or because he was
stolen from, or just because he's a bad
person, nobody should be rationalizing that anywhere in
the world. And I'm not doing that now.
The point is to simply understand that that
does not then immediately make every single other
person with all the different varying aspects we
just discussed the same thing.
But it says the situation in Afghanistan
mirrors this pattern.
So we've talked about Syria, Syria,
Iraq, Afghanistan.
The same pattern. Invasion, occupation, destruction, and subsequent
refugee crisis. So we need to see this
as maybe a a I mean, I don't
think maybe. I think it's by design.
That's the pattern.
Invasion, and you get what you get. You
get the justifications from this. You get to
you know, all the things that happened during
the ongoing invasion. War weapon sales. All the
different things we're always talking about. The occupation,
control, resources,
theft, destruction. I argue that comes into play
when ultimately it's about
destabilizing
certain processes
or hurting certain organizations
or destroying different levels of business that you
wanna circumvent or actually outsource.
And then
refugee crisis, which you then use for exactly
what we're talking about today. This has happened
over and over and over.
Another critical example is Libya.
In 2 1011, the Obama Clinton administration conducted
illegal military bombardment and killed the leader of
one of Africa's most prosperous and stable nations
in all of Africa at the time at
the highest quality of life.
Free education, free health care.
I mean, it and this is easily verifiable.
Of course, it had these problems.
But to pretend that they were even thinking
or even desire to liberate them is shockingly
naive.
Especially since they then destroyed the country and
then left it, acting like they freed everybody
when then they left it with an open
slave market. Where the very people they claim
they were fighting started selling them as slaves.
The peep you know, the Libyan people that
they claim they were fighting for.
That is your US government. That is your
US government being led and involved with Israel
and the rest of them as you can
prove.
And
the influx of the people that they all
these moderate rebels, the pipeline came directly from
Libya, at least in part.
And it says
the most prosperous one of, at least, the
nation at the time, who had been instrumental
in limiting limiting illegal migration to Europe.
So do you think that was by accident?
They opened those floodgates, and that caused exactly
what they then used to justify other actions.
Destabilization,
key among them, ladies and gentlemen.
The aftermath of Gaddafi's
removal is evident today.
A key aspect of this entire discussion is
that very few Europeans who oppose
illegal immigration
and advocate for the reparation of migrants have
spoken out
re the repatriation, excuse me. So, you know,
to send them to put them back in
their countries,
have spoken out against these unlawful invasions, none
of them that he can see, very few
anyway, have spoken out against these invasions
and the exploitation of the national resources of
Middle Eastern and African nations, which is the
cause for what they're upset about.
He says it's important to recognize that these
nations possess
enormous
natural resources and demonstrate significant capabilities.
Historically,
prior to the rise of the western world,
these areas, and this is what you'll get
the pushback resistance from people that wanna pretend
like they've always been cave dwelling maniacs
because they're just that disgusting of people.
Before
the rise of the Western world, these areas
were known for exporting their scientific advancements and
innovations to Europe,
which was then living in the dark ages
and was busy burning witches.
This is not about white versus anything else,
guys. This is about the reality that throughout
history,
it's not as simple as the way that
we treat the world today. And then, I
mean, this is the same way that we
talk about the war on terror and the
they frame all of these groups as, you
know, terrorists living in caves and they're barbarians.
Well, I'll literally play Trump saying that in
his speech to a bunch of Israelis in
a crowd. Do you realize how in how,
like, shockingly racist and disgusting that is when
you realize that places like Iran, for example,
the one that he's aiming at,
as I've said many times, is wildly technologically
advanced.
It takes it takes half a brain cell
to quickly look that up and figure it
out for yourself. But a lot of Americans
who don't wanna know any better frame them
as being the Islamic terrorists that the, you
know, we need to stop to save the
world from the, you know, the the way
the one of the largest points I'm seeing
right now is this encroach these the we're
watching civilization
taken away day by day.
And all it really is is a lot
of these tweets where they just don't even
know what they're talking about, and they're framing
simply a cultural difference.
And that's
stoked. It's leaned into the lowest common denominator
by most people in the paradigm.
Or, you know, the leadership of the paradigm
I'm talking about.
Now it says the legacy of centuries of
colonialism
has now transitioned into a form of neocolonialism
to maintain the impoverished impoverishment and subjugation of
these regions.
Consequently,
this has led to an increase in the
number of migrants and refugees. Obviously. Now one
aspect I'll add to that is that, of
course, we have things like Russia, China, China
in most in particular when it comes to
areas like Africa, who are trying to make
more advantageous
deals with these entities.
And, look, I've said every time when I
talk about this, I have no doubt that
China, when if and when they can, will
exploit whatever they can. But the point is
they recognize, just like I talk about with
Russia, now, yes, I could be too pessimistic
here. And maybe you think they're the good
guys of the world. I just flatly disagree.
But my point is any of them will
eventually become what the US is when given
the same amount of power and reach and
influence.
Russia and China, I believe, are the same,
like, next in line. My point though is
that China or Russia recognize that it's advantageous
to them right now to play that counterbalance.
Again, I could just be wrong, but I
think that's the obvious point. That you have
them going, Okay, well, look at the US
and even their own people, which is true,
are seeing what they're doing.
They're belligerently stomping around the world, doing what
they want at the expense of everybody, and
then calling it freedom.
And they're stealing from people and resources based
on these guise of
bringing them some freedom and liberty. And all
they really do is destroy everything and take
what they want. It's shockingly obvious.
Look look at the countries they supposedly liberated.
Afra Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Libya. We just talked
about it. They're batting 0, apparently.
So the point is then China goes, okay.
Well, we're gonna make an agreement with these
people.
And I again, I I promise you that
they will take advantage.
But the US then goes, well, we don't
want that, and so we'd rather steal it,
and we wanna make you look like the
bad guy, so we go, China bad guy,
we can't let them make deals with these
people.
It's it's very simple to see. So when
he's talking about the idea of the
new conversation,
right, to maintain the impoverishment and subjugation, that's
what the western world is key the the
entirety of the African continent, for crying out
loud, for the most part, has been kept
in this impoverished position because they are benefiting
from their resources.
Same with Yemen, same with any number of
countries.
And here you got the other entities going,
hey. Well, I'll give you a little bit
more. Why wouldn't they take it?
Now going forward, it says, having spent nearly
a decade in Europe, he says, I can
share from my own experiences that many people,
especially from my native country,
come to Europe seeking better opportunities to rebuild
their lives. Now, I would argue that's by
and large because you've destroyed what they have
going on there or kept them in a
place that is destabilized,
but maybe I'm just too pessimistic or rather
jaded. And it says, in the aftermath of
the regime change war in Syria in 2011,
Germany imported
over 5,000 doctors from Syria. And we're gonna
make a big point about this. I've played
the video before about the gumballs, and I
think it's an important point. He says these
professionals are crucial for the health care system
in Syria.
Yet, they found their way to Germany.
The point that we'll make we'll go play
the video in a second is that what
a lot of what the western world does
is
essentially just scoop up all the top of
of of people that would be like, the
point they make is that the lowest aspect
of it, the people that are too poor
and too impoverished, they don't have the ability
to my to come to this to, you
know, come to the United States or any
roads for that matter.
So what the the people that they do
end up taking are the ones that might
otherwise be able to help that country
better better themselves. Of course, that was if
they weren't under the thumb of these other
edge countries who pretend to be trying to
help them. I argue whether they're state or
not, they're they're made to stay in this
position with puppet governments that outsource everything for
their bet for their benefit of the foreign
countries. But my point is the same, is
that they take these 5,000 doctors who would
otherwise be helping that country.
He says, yet they found their way to
Germany. This trend is evident in various other
fields as well. However, with a huge influx
of refugees and migrants, bad apples could also
come and create problems. That's just an inevitability.
And those bad apples could be PhDs.
But the point is that this few we
have, that it has to be this, you
know, anybody out there in the world is
capable of very bad and very good. Anybody.
This is, but one seldom encri encounters migrants
who film themselves,
like we're gonna point out here, while contributing
positively to society
with work and tax contributions.
Instead, it's often those engaged in negative activities
who seek to showcase their actions. And then
we should ask whether, you know, why would
they actually do that? What's the benefit to
them to making a video showing themselves do
the thing that gets them more hate? That
gets them more, you know, people wanting to
kick them out of the con what's the
point? Now maybe there is none. If you
think this is real, maybe they just hate
this country.
But I think you sense that there's something
very off about this. Now he writes, in
conclusion, I would like to address the content
of this video we're gonna show you now.
It appears that the same entities responsible for
instigating wars
and generating the refugee crisis that he just
highlighted are now backing right wing sentiments in
Europe to foster divisions and instability. So what
he's saying there is whatever you think about
this video, whatever you think about the crisis,
these people we're talking about are using this.
That's undeniable no matter what you think, it's
easy to prove.
They're pointing at these things and going, see?
You're gonna be overtaken by the Muslim hordes
if you don't do what we think you
should do. Let us kill Palestinians too, though.
That's what we're getting.
And in any of these elements, not just
Israel. He's right. They're leaning into this and
stoking these divisions. And it says, it seems
that everyone is being manipulated, and such videos,
agree with him, highly likely fabricated or staged,
are produced to incite civil war.
This is a very real thing. As much
as it's completely manufactured, in my opinion, the
the byproduct or rather the outcome of what
they're trying to accomplish is very real. So
here's the video.
This is how I got you now.
You hear me, Kevin?
You can't listen to my life.
Very I mean, guys, it sounds like Oscar
from Sesame Street or without even the right
person.
Am I crazy? That sounds ridiculous.
This is our country now. That's what he's
talking like. That's what he's saying. It's our
country now?
Like, again, I mean, I I I know
it's easy to fall into these traps and
it's certainly possible this could be what happened.
But, like, when we see things, like, when
they keep telling you that Assad just wants
to gas people because he's a bad maniac
despite all the evidence pointing in the other
direction and they just keep doing it. If
anybody does it, we're gonna blame Assad because
he just likes to gas children apparently.
You start going, well, hold on a minute.
Like, it's certainly possible, but
why would he do the one thing that
they would need to you know, maybe they're
faking it. Right? Like, this is the kind
of thing we need to ask.
What is the actual logic to doing this?
To coming out, this is
and and who stands to benefit from pushing
this out there?
Okay. Let me ask you this. I think
it's called syntax. Right? There's nothing you can
do about it. Who talks like that? Who
actually
that's not just
that sounds I don't know. I mean, I
I it's complete assumption at this point, and
I'm just theorizing here because it's important to
consider things, and I'm always clear when I
do that.
But that to me
seems to it sounds like somebody trying to
hide the way that they would speak, like,
with an accent.
But ask yourself, who actually talks like that?
That's not an accent thing. That's not another
country thing. That's a weird that's choose that
that to me screams
fake. And, actually, to be I'm being honest,
and I know you'll many out there, even
my followers are probably thinking because that's where
my mind is going, and it is.
But if you've watched the Israeli propaganda that
we've seen, I mean, this is kind of
ridiculous, cartoonish things that they think that they
can get away with or because apparently they
always have, and they're really just this bad
at propaganda.
But either way, I'll play it out. Listen
to how dumb this all is.
There is nothing you're thinking
about
I know that. Pretty sure that guy is
white. They're both white with 1 black guy
there. So let's make sure we think about
that when we're talking about the,
you know, hordes coming from the Middle East
which is the way this is being presented.
It's I keep seeing these videos where they're
going, this is what it's causing. And I'm
like, there's like 3 white people there. I
can see them right in the video. It
doesn't matter though. It's it's all about the
narrative.
And then he pees on it. That's that's
the video.
So
this person
responds. Now I'm not and you tell me
what you think.
I mean, I I I to me, it's
almost embarrassing how that feels wrong. Right? It
feels
very fake and very, very coordinated. But, you
know, again, maybe that's just because we're super
on guard. It's certainly possible somebody could just
talk like Oscar the Grouch. I mean, it's
certainly possible, but I think it's pretty silly.
And and, again, this is what the this
is the the level of, like,
kindergarten propaganda that we've gotten from Israel the
entire time. Now, again, it's not just my
grasping thought. They're we're gonna get into the
evidence, which I think ties a lot of
this to back to Israel. But to me,
that seems pretty silly.
Now this person says, it seems to me
that Israel was trying to stoke up mistrust
between Europeans and the Arab world.
Iranian security services claimed that the Koran burner
in Sweden,
Salwan,
Mamaka, has connections with Israel intelligence. I don't
know if it's true, but I would it
would make sense. And he says he saw
a photo of that person carrying an Israeli
flag. And guess what? There it is right
there. He did he found it. Oh, I
found it. Here it is. So what he's
telling you is this is the person
that supposedly burned a a Quran in Sweden.
And apparently, he's part of the Israeli. He's,
you know, at least supports Israel and, you
know, the point is I think it's easy
to see how a lot of this ties
back to the same entities.
But he follows up and saying, there is
nobody in Sweden who wants to burn a
Quran or any other book for that amounts
to their opinion anyway, but he posts the
the video of it.
So there's one person thinking simply highlighting this
in that way.
This is another one where oh, that's the
same one.
This one, the guy says, add add to
your last point,
the reason for promotion of civil unrest, and
this is what I see as well, is
to manufacture consent
for the removal of certain civil rights and
liberties, for stability, for security. Now you could
argue that in the classic sense of just
saying, well, we need to control your lives
because terrorism or you could see the very
clear writing on the wall for digital IDs
and and and digital passports and all sorts
of biometric pa this is everywhere. Every problem
under the sun seems to have the same
solution right now. Funny how we were able
to highlight that during COVID, but we can't
piece that together when they divide you using
typical 2 party illusion division tactics.
This person says the people who supported the
regime change wars
are the people encouraging immigration,
not the other way around, he says.
Okay. And he said, and the leaders of
the Western countries are puppets of something external
to the country.
The leaders of the Western countries are puppets
of something external. I would agree with that
to start to a large degree. But what
he's saying here is something that I think
is important to consider.
From, you know, the kinda the opposite. The
people who supported the regime change wars,
so your government,
not one side or the other. I mean,
literally, even if you see them as 2
sides, both of them support regime change wars.
But my point is it's all just your
government using those tactics to keep you divided
and not seeing who is responsible,
them.
But he's saying they're the ones responsible,
not the other way around. Okay? So my
point would be simple that I mean, I
guess you could argue he simply means any
of them behind those, and I would agree
with that. But either way, my point is
to make sure we don't fall in that
trap that you think somehow it's the Democrats
doing this or if the Republicans doing this.
It's your government, guys. It's as simple as
that. And, of course, the point being with
this is this guy could be a average
person who has an opinion. He could be
a bot. I think that's the larger one
of the larger points today is how we're
all being very clearly engineered
using this new technical technological direction. We're gonna
get into that right now after this immigration
point, overlapping that with the chat g p
t, Peter Thiel, and Musk, and all all
it's they're all being very clear about where
this is going.
Now, Arnab Butrand
has an interesting addition to this. And this
comes from a nature study. Now then after
this, we're gonna play that video that I
think is very important to consider.
But Arnaud Arnaud highlights this study
that I think is important to consider from
those now, of course, the people that wanna
see this as the partisan
view will immediately just and question the study
like you should question everything. That's always a
given. But we'll just dismiss this because this
is not what my belief says or what
my but consider this. This is a peer
reviewed study which doesn't mean that it has
to be true, but the evidence is interesting.
And he says this fascinating nature study
by, Jason Hinkle
and others should destroy
for every for the forever, he says,
the myth
that workers in the global south steal jobs
at the expense of the global north.
Interesting.
Now there is an element of this. You
can't deny that there's gonna be some element
where somebody who comes in might be able
to take a job that otherwise would have
I but the the point seems to become
about race when in reality, shouldn't it be
like, isn't this the whole point from the
right? When you're talking about politics, for example,
that it should be merit based and not
based on whether or not, you know, you're
black or lesbian. Right?
Well, isn't this the same point? Right? Oh,
no. But we're now treading in dangerous territory.
The idea should be that if somebody legally
legally comes into the country, right, that they
should be able to it shouldn't be based
on whether they're an immigrant or not. They
should be based on whether they're better for
the job. Right?
It's funny how the inconsistencies and the paradigm
are easy to point
out. But on top, the point comes into
play when we're talking about the idea
that the governments could surreptitiously
or deliberately
let in a lot of people for their,
you know, let's just take the US and
democrats and saying, oh, we'll do this, we're
gonna get more votes. Even though that clearly
doesn't even translate that way anymore. It's, it's
I don't think Mexicans from Mexico or other
immigrants or even old democrat like they pretend
they are. Just I think it's actually quite
opposite. But either way,
the point is that you can argue that
letting people into the country could be used
as one weaponized migration from the own government's
perspective. But if the argument is that they're
the just from the main point, stealing jobs,
well, this study seems to add another angle
to it or level to the argument. It
says they find an astonishing metric that quote,
while southern workers contribute 90%
of the labor that powers the world economy,
they receive only 21% of global income.
So you can look at it one of
2 ways, assuming this is accurate. The idea
being that and I've looked at it, but
assuming, you know, you can look at the
study and you can decide if you think
they're misleading you for politics, it's always possible.
That this either means they're being exploited to
an incredible degree,
which then should you know, then the argument
should be like we were saying earlier, that
we need to recognize that these are you
know, it's the other way around, that they're
being used as opposed to being, you know,
taking advantage of the country, but on top,
or the other way.
That they are coming in and ultimately
contributing like anybody else, but ultimately getting a
fraction of the actual income. So that doesn't
mean the job's not being taken. Right? But
see, I don't I just think these arguments
are are rooted in dishonesty for the most
part. And it says meaning meaning, of course,
that the lifestyle
of the North
is subsidized by the work of the South.
Now it doesn't have to be North and
South. This is just the cons the concept
as far back as you wanna look of
colonialism or subjugation. I mean, it's the same
way with Africa and the UK and US
we were just talking about.
They maintain the situation. Now, of course, they
blame it on the way they live their
lives or their ideology or their communist or
their what but it's not the reality. It's
because they did this. They're taking from them
and they're holding them in that position like
anybody honest will tell you. So it's similar
here. As far back as you wanna look,
you've got people in in powerful positions that
exploit the people that are not.
Now today, we try to make sense of
this in other ways and this does have
a level to it, but I think that's
the larger point. But it says, if we
lived in a fair world, those contributing 90%
of the labor should theoretically receive 90% of
the income. Right?
Not 21%.
Concretely, the study calculates that an extra 826000000000
hours of Southern labor,
equivalent to 369,000,000
workers, is effectively appended to northern economies as
invisible ghost workers, he says, which is more
than the total workforce of the United States
and the European Union combined.
And before I hear you say, he goes
he says, quote, yes, but it's all low
skilled
labor.
He says, that's not true at all. All
as per the study, the South, quote, contributes
the majority of labor across all skill levels.
76%
of the high skilled labor. That's crazy.
91%
of the medium skilled labor, 96%
of the low skilled labor. So it's quite
the opposite in fact if you take this
at face value. In fact, he says astonishingly
astonishingly
quote, the South now contributes more high skilled
labor to the world economy
than all the high, medium, and low skilled
labor contributions of the no global north combined.
Now, of course, I can you know, there's
people that are gonna come at this and
say that this study has been manufactured to
produce this because this is gonna you know,
certainly possible. Right? But so it's important to
look at it with the I I point
is always with that kind of response,
that's certainly one of the possibilities. But if
you're just gonna reflexively say that without proving
that, then you're just making what you want
of a of a of a piece of
data because you don't like what it shows.
Right? So if that's the case, then look
through it and point out where the inconsistencies
are. Point out where they're faking this or
lying about that to achieve that end. Otherwise,
it's just another study that's peer reviewed that
has data that seems interesting.
And it goes on to say, you could
also say yes, but it's just a temporary
situation. As global south countries develop, they'll progressively
become like the north, but that's precisely what
this study shows, is impossible
because, what we'll get into next, the north's
development model relies
on appropriation from elsewhere. I think this is
the crux of the point.
That we that that this left right paradigm
conversation from one side of it likes to
argue like they're taking advantage.
When in reality, it seems to be quite
the opposite, where you've got the powerful and
again, pull this out of your mind of
a US versus Mexico or something like that.
Just pull yourself out of it and just
recognize powerful people and those that they subjugate.
This is what happens.
That they've kept this situation where they're using
these people to keep it's like with Africa,
like we just said. They keep this dynamic
going, which keeps them impoverished. And and if
they ultimately wanted to develop like, I don't
know, a gold backed dinar to be able
to enrich themselves or use their own natural
resources to give people free healthcare, well, they
go regime change for freedom and then they
leave Libya in ruins. And then they can
keep taking their resources.
That's what they're trying to do in Venezuela.
They did to Bolivia momentarily. They're this is
what they do, ladies and gentlemen.
So in this point, whether you think that's
the full reality or not, it is a
part of this conversation that we can't deny.
And these stats they're showing are pretty compelling.
Look at it for yourself. And it says
this implies 2 things. 1, the North has
no incentive for the South to develop because
their very model depends on appropriation from the
South. And 2, the South can't develop like
the North because they have no South of
their own to exploit.
They need to find their own model that
doesn't rely on exploitation,
akin to China who developed their own the
with their own workers
and is progressively using more and more robots
as its workforce gains and skills. Now, I
clearly, I think Art Albertan has a a
positive percept perception of a lot of things
China, but some of these things aren't inaccurate,
what he's saying. But I still always feel
that China, like any other government, would take
advantage of what they can, where they can.
I think that's quite easy to prove.
But, nonetheless, the point is that they are
taking a different path. He's he's highlighting. And
he says, also, the South catching up with
the North is not the direction at all,
except for some rare exceptions. The studies show
that on average, quote, wages of southern workers
are 83 to 98%
lower for work of equal skill within the
same sector. And these wage gaps, quote, have
increased substantially over time across all skill levels
in all sectors indicating a steady increase in
absolute north south income inequality.
It's no different than the inequality we experience
in this country in and of itself. Now
it says, so what's the solution?
The study concludes that, quote, development and poverty
eradication
and any plausible trajectory
for reducing global inequality, which I'll always point
out should not be the responsibility
inherently of any individual
or the government should not say it's our
responsibility
to help these people.
I personally would. I think as a individual
I think it's we should. It's charity. Right?
Showing compassion for people that are struggling, especially
when you can recognize that your government put
them there. But again, I always it's about
freedom and liberty. It should not be your
responsibility. You should you have the right to
say I don't care that they're suffering. That's
your right. So I I always wanna make
that clear. I'm never of the mind that
their the government should be able to, like,
tax you for something that they think we
should it should be about like, again, frankly,
frankly, I don't think the government should be
taxing you for damn near anything. And I
think the government should be there to uphold
the constitution, and that's about it. But back
to the point, requires a shift in the
balance of power
between north and south.
The point was reducing global inequality.
The the study concludes that the development of
poverty eradication and any plausible trajectory for reducing
global inequality requires
a shift in the balance of power,
such that the latter is able to reclaim
its productive cap capacities
to meet human needs. Now, of course, some
might frame that as taking from the north,
but realizing that this is what we're talking
about is just
leaving the resources to these countries. But of
course, my point, whether we're talking about war
or anything else, as I've said many times,
I'll point out in a moment,
that the US government runs on the blood
or rather resources of other countries. So if
you remove that, the government itself would collapse.
I mean, we can see that this government's
held up with shoestrings and bubble gum with
the what is it now? 40,000,000,000,000 a $1,000,000,000,000,000,000
a $1,000,000,000,000,000 of debt. I don't even know
anymore. I can look at the clock, but
I frankly think it's irrelevant. It's just a
number that we can't even fathom.
It's only a matter of time. They built
this in just like with 2,008. They know
what they're doing.
The point though is that we can recognize
that that's what we should do.
Let the lithium and gold of Venezuela be
Venezuelans and let that help the people of
Venezuela despite what your government want you to
think they're doing. It's already provable that they
were doing that before they stopped them. Or
any number a number of other things, which
again, I could easily argue that those governments
would exploit their peoples.
But that's for the Venezuelans to deal with.
The idea that we pretend like it's your
response isn't that the very thing I just
said? Like, it's funny, the Republicans would tell
you that it's not our responsibility, but then
at the same time, then cheer them on
for regime change because bad communism. Doesn't that
seem like it doesn't make sense?
So many things like that. But it says,
towards this end, international wage floors and minimum
resource prices could help reduce price inequalities and
limit value transfers.
Ending in unequal exchange
or rather just no like, the idea of
if they're individuals
or comp like, I I don't think government
should be forcing other countries to do anything.
I don't I mean, I shouldn't even have
to say that out loud. But it says
where was I? Ending on e unequal exchange
will also require ending structural adjustment conditions on
finance
and,
democratizing
the institutions of global
economic governance
so that global south governments are free to
use industrial, fiscal, and monetary policy to pursue
sovereign developments and reduce their dependency on northern
capital. Essentially, what I was saying at a
a lot of but it says such reforms
are unlikely to be handed down from above,
obviously,
for the reason I just said. Such reforms
are unlikely to be handed down from above.
It will require a political struggle for national
self determination
and economic sovereignty similar to the scope to
the anti colonial movement of the 20th century.
But it's not just a struggle for national
self determination. I mean, you've literally got your
boot on their neck. So the like, with
Iraq voting that they want the US to
leave, which they're doing again, but they've done
a lot they've done before and the US
just said no.
Oh, so that's how it works out. They
don't they want self determination and you say,
nope. Sorry. But we respect your sovereignty. Except
that's literally what you just said you did
not respect.
So read the study. I find it to
be very important.
So let's watch this video keeping all this
in mind. And I'll stop it here and
there, I think. This is a video that
I think is important.
A man giving a demonstration on
immigration.
And I've played this before in the past,
actually, using gumballs as representations for,
I believe a 1000000 immigrants.
And this is a very easy thing to
understand.
Now, again, don't take this from a left
right perspective. Recognize that what's being discussed here
is what we just read.
Like, going back to the point to where
you're not re taking resources from other countries,
really, that you would then allow them, the
people in those countries, to help better their
own situation.
And should you want to help them, you
can help them from where you are, but
it should not be something we force on
anybody. And the ultimate point being, in my
opinion, without
the
colonialization, without the constant occupation
and theft that these countries would end up
developing like they did long before where they
were put in this position
by the current power structure,
which again, like Kevork was pointing out, is
easy to prove.
Some people say that mass immigration into the
United States can help reduce world poverty.
Is that
true? Well, no, it's not. And let me
show you why.
This gumball represents
the 1,000,000
legal immigrants that the United States has taken
every year on average since 1990.
Now who in the world
deserves our humanitarian
compassion?
The World Bank has one measure of the
desperately poor of the world. They make less
than $2
a day.
And how many people make less than $2
a day in the world? We'll start with
Africa.
In Africa alone,
there are
650,000,000
people
who make less than $2 a day. 650,000,000.
And in India,
another
890,000,000
people desperately poor.
China
adds another 480,000,000
people
making less than $2 a day and unfortunately
the rest of Asia has a heartbreaking
810,000,000
people
who the World Bank says make less than
$2
a day.
And finally, there's a 105,000,000
of Latin America's population
that are desperately poor. All told, the World
Bank says there are 3,000,000,000
people in the world. 3,000,000,000
people
who are desperately poor making less than $2
a day. That's 3,000 gumballs.
And every year,
we take a million
and suggest
that we've somehow made a humanitarian difference.
Of course,
we don't pull our immigrants
from these desperately poor populations, do we? These
people are too poor, too sick, too disconnected
to make it here as immigrants.
We tend to pull our immigrants out of
the better off poor of the world.
And Mexico tends to define the type of
immigrant that we bring here because the plurality
of people come from Mexico.
And Mexico is poor.
How many people in the world live in
countries that have average incomes lower
than that of Mexico?
And the World Bank tells us that that
number is
these 3,000,000,000
plus another 2,600,000,000
people.
5,600,000,000
people in the world
who live in countries
with average incomes below that of Mexico.
That's 5,600
gumballs.
And so what is it that the elites
are telling us? They're telling us that when
we take
this 1,000,000 immigrants,
that we somehow or another are tackling
world poverty. And we have to do it
regardless of the effect on our unemployed, the
working poor, the most vulnerable members of our
society.
And, look, you should never dismiss the reality
of just
immigration,
weaponized migration, any of it, having an effect
on society.
It's not a racist thing to point out.
It's just how the it's the reality of
what he's describing when that many people you
know, And that's part of the weaponized concept
of it, of destabilization.
Right? As I thought I made clear, it's
not just about jobs. Right? I thought I
was very clear about that. The point is
that's one aspect that usually gets focused on.
I was very clear about the destabilization, about
how this is hurting people, about how there
are things happening. Thought I was anyway. But
the point on that is that we can
see,
you know, you've got the left side of
this in the paradigm
clearly pushing for for immigration.
Then the normal game is that, well, the
right is against that, but that's not even
accurate. There's still clearly immigration that happens under
the right. My point is that you have
it coming from a different angle. You have
the other elements of this. And I I
I this is a global dynamic.
If you the the reality is that these
things are being driven, and you could even
simply take it from a foreign policy perspective,
that you're destroying
people's lives that then end up flooding like
with Venezuela, like they admitted to doing Bolton
and ab Abrams,
the caravan that comes because of their sanctions
and starvation. And so either way you look
at it, they're all driving the same concept.
But, you know, it it's always framed as
a one versus the other kind of game.
Regardless of the effect on our natural resources.
Even if we went by the most radical
proposals in Washington, which are to actually
double
our immigration to 2,000,000 a year,
which would totally overwhelm our physical, natural and
social infrastructures,
we couldn't make a noticeable difference. And we
may be really hurting
the impoverished people of the world
because the million that we do take
are among the most energetic,
often the better educated.
And this is the point that was being
made in that study. Right? And so I
don't think this is by accident.
I think this is by design.
And the game is to keep it this
way
at the expense of literally everybody.
And then people stoke these flames for certain
agendas at certain times, and I think this
is all this is constant. And there's a
lot more around it, but I think that's
obvious.
Certainly, the most dissatisfied people that if they
did not immigrate
would be the ages for change
to improve the lot of all the people
in these countries.
The true heroes
in the global humanitarian field are the people
in these countries
who have the wherewithal
to immigrate to another country, but instead stay
in their countries
to apply their skills to help their fellow
countrymen.
Now, obviously, it shouldn't have to be said
but the point would be that, you know,
I believe in free movement from a worldwide
perspective, human right. So if somebody wants to
move because they want to move, that's that's
that's their prerogative. But I agree with the
concept that if it's the I it's my
point is not about whether they should be
told to stay there, rather that our system
and our governments
exploit that, draw them over, and just and
try to make that happen. Right? I think
that's the main thing.
Unfortunately,
our immigration system tends to entice
these very type of people to abandon their
countrymen.
The impossibility
of making even a dent
is actually worse than it looks here. Because
last year, when we took
1,000,000 immigrants,
these countries added,
burst over deaths,
80,000,000
more people into the impoverished population.
Now that's the secondary problem.
Right? Why is that happening?
Of course, they want you to think it's
because of who they are. It's because of
what they believe.
Sort of like how they want you to
think. They hate us because of our freedom.
It's all the same game, guys. And at
the end of the day, it's because
the west largely sits in their comfortable locations
and doesn't care unless it's happening in front
of you. And this is not necessarily everyone
out there listening. It's not your fault.
If you're aware of it and you don't
care, then it is. But a lot of
people just don't understand how this works and
understand how your governments love to project the
idea of freedom and liberty and democracy and
then go over and rape, murder, and pillage
in your name,
and then take from you as well when
you're not looking. Right? That's the main point.
And so all these people in these countries
that get added every year after year, it's
because of these exploit exploit,
exploitative
exploit
these these actions that are exploit exploit these
foreign countries. And I I I think it's
just constant. It's policy, guys.
If they truly I mean, there there's a
point that I used to make all the
time. I I'm sure it's changed by now,
but simple. And, again, my point's always the
same as before is that you should not
be un obligated
to to help anybody you don't want to.
But the reality has always been, and the
the 30,000,000,000
give or take, was enough to solve world
hunger. WHO has made that you know, I'm
sure I'm sure the number's more now, but
if last I used to look, that's what
it was. But, again, it shouldn't be anybody's
obligation. But are we and and then all
these programs and everything that's hap I mean,
and they spend
far more than that
to do all these things in the bureaucratic
processes, which rarely amount to any positive change
like we're seeing. Instead, they could just go,
here's $30,000,000,000
and save the world's hunger problem. But the
point is now, again, I'm not suggesting that
they do that. My point though is they
could, and the point is that if they
did that, well,
then there wouldn't be something to exploit.
There it would be okay. Imagine a world
where there wasn't massive hunger, locations
of people starving to death. And all of
a sudden, you took an action that caused
that. Well, wow. That would be very pronounced.
Why are those people all of a sudden
starving? Because you took things from them, because
you bombed their country, because you keep these
places in constant subjugation and constant fear
and poverty.
It's hard to see, isn't it? You know,
good analogy. It's sort of like now them
using placebos that are actually just the same
vaccine. So then when you look and go,
man, they had heart attacks and blood clots
and their eyes stopped working. Oh, but guess
what? Same thing happened to the placebo. No
problem at all.
It's how they work.
And this year,
congress is bringing in a 1000000 legal immigrants.
And this year, according to the United Nations,
these countries
are expected to add another 80,000,000
people.
And next year, you could be quite sure
that Congress,
unless stopped by the American voters,
will bring in another 1000000 immigrants
and these countries unfortunately will be adding
another 80,000,000 people.
So one, it should not be perceived I
mean, it's always there's all there's an overlap
of anything bad with anything. People could have
negative intentions behind any choice. My point though
is that it doesn't have to be racist
to say that we don't think we should
take immigrants.
I guarantee it probably near impossible to happen
because I think the system runs on that.
And both the left and the right are
very aware of that, otherwise known as your
government.
And they play the back and forth game
to keep you divided about it. My point
though is let's just say every American was
like, you know what? We're in a bad
spot. We are to stop all immigration. And
we voted for that. It should not be
perceived as racist. Because I think, ultimately, you
can recognize that there is a self interest,
and a lot of places could probably feel
the same. But I don't think that'll happen.
But But I want us to stand back
and consider how that's the way this is
always framed. That somehow the right and there
is clearly an engineered level of very obvious
racism around this conversation. But some people who
just see the numbers and go, why are
we doing this? We're struggling here. I don't
have enough for my family. Like, it's it's
not always one or the other. It's not
some binary game. That's the way they need
you to see it to keep you guys
fighting each other.
The reality here is they're gonna keep, you
know, pretending we need more immigrants to come
in. The right's gonna, you know, counterbalance that
with the other the other extreme, both of
which are keeping war going which causes the
migrants to come in. They both sides benefit
from the exploitation of these countries.
And then there there's your 2 party pair.
It's the constant.
It's the counterbalance. Right? It's the feedback loop.
It's everything we're constantly doing. They're telling you
what they want you to hear, so we
keep thinking they're on your side, and I
everything just keeps zombie walking forward.
End of these impoverished nations.
We could take 5,000,000 a year,
but we never
get ahead
of what's happening in these countries, not in
this century.
Don't you see?
Immigration
can never be an effective or significant way
to deal with the suffering people of the
world.
They have to be helped
where they live.
Again, in no way we at least I'm
suggesting that we should then be on the
hook to help those people. I mean, even
with our governments being responsible by and large
for what's happening, that the individual out there
should not be on the hook to have
to help people over in their countries. I'd
like to believe that as human beings that
a lot of us would feel the desire
to do so.
1, because your government acted in your name.
But again, I've no way would I ever
argue it should be obligated because that's not
freedom. That's not liberty.
99.9%
of them
will never
be able to immigrate to rich country. There's
no hope for that. They have to bloom
where they're planted.
The only place
that 99.9%
of these people
can be helped is where they live.
Let's help them there.
And the overall point, again,
is that the reason that they might need
help
is because of what our foreign policy has
done. Now, again, that's not gonna be literally
every situation. I'm sure there are people that
are, you know, governments that are poorly managing.
Either way, by and large, what we can
see is
provably
the fault of exploitation
without question.
And so if we wanna talk about helping,
that will be the first step you would
take.
Stopping your government from keeping them in that
position and exploiting them from whether it's resources,
whether it's funding, whether it's gold and silver,
whether it's their top 1%. That's what they
do.
That's such an important I mean, if not
one of the most important aspects of this
conversation,
and you rarely get that in the left
right paradigm back and forth.
Now a couple other points I wanna include.
You this is some of the things we're
seeing circulate and you'll find this just one
you I plucked out, you're gonna see them
all over the place.
This is a a somebody, you know, got
kind of prominent during COVID 19 conversation.
That's even like the WEF thing about, oh,
nothing would be happy.
But, you know, frankly, I see share kind
of a lot of misinformation lately around a
lot of these topics, like a lot of
people on Twitter. Well, that's their right. That
is free speech.
It says when 6 4 bouncers start getting
lynched in the street,
which
didn't happen. It's a beating.
But this is my point from before, where
you're seeing, like,
where this I I said there's a weird
thing happening around this. You've probably seen it
as well. Look at these people getting lynched
in the street. I keep seeing this. And
I'm like, okay. Well, all I see is
somebody getting beat up. Are you intentionally misusing
the word lynched? Why is that happening? I
also don't know, but I find it interesting
by gangs of immigrants, he says.
Well, okay. The video
in Spain, by the way,
you can see one black guy and seemingly
all the rest of them are white and
then looks like one Hispanic guy.
Okay. Where's the assumption? Where where is this
coming from? Do you have any evidence to
suggest this is anything other than a bunch
of guys beating up a doorman?
No. Not that I can see. He could
be right. But my this is the kind
of thing we keep seeing.
And all the video is
you can see them all right there.
There's one black guy. And then the rest
look either white or Hispanic to me. Not
not even remotely what the current focal point
is.
Oh, there's
2.
Alright. That's all it is. And so they
end up beating this guy up,
which he messed up. It's also stupid that
none of those people helped him. Well, they're
bouncers for crying out loud. But why does
this become
a problem about immigration?
Gangs of immigrants. Because that's the current narrative.
That's the big conversation.
That's what is being pushed into your consciousness.
And then, again,
the lynched.
Lynched in the streets. Now here's what's weird.
You this video
is shared over and over with the same
thing. When a 6 four bouncer starts getting
lynched in the streets by a game of
This one says invaders. Okay. Where are they
getting this word from? Are they is this
some kind of Israel app for propaganda like
we see in there?
Oh, every one of them. Every single one
of them.
Are they all bots?
Probably. That's what we see happening on Twitter
right now. It's not just unique to Israel.
We're being gamed right now, guys. It's very
obvious. Or they're all just sharing the same
thing which is kinda just as creepy. Like,
literally just reposting the exact same thing. My
point is if you scroll back far enough,
you're gonna find the lynched in the street
to other discussions that we've talked about where
you're they're not being lynched in the street.
They're being beat up. Maybe it means nothing,
but I I you these are the kind
of things that stand out. You know, you
start to see a pattern.
And you go, okay, well where's that coming
from? What's driving that? Why is this and
I think there's something happening here. I think
this is part of some kind of ongoing
social engineering campaign.
Now don't forget, by the way, that we've
talked about this in regard to Israel in
particular in the US conversation where and it's
I've made this point when it happened, it's
we and it it's almost even more incredibly,
like,
or, what the
conspicuous
that they nope. People just never talked about
this again?
Well, we talked about this on January 2024.
A suspected terrorist at the Texas border when
that was all the hype,
turns out he worked for Mossad.
They they argued at the time it these
are these are not the person.
An Azerbaijani
terrorist
is what they said.
And they tried and the guy this is
the guy that came up and said, you'll
know who I am soon enough. And all
of a sudden, you got these reports. Looks
like he's from he's a Palestinian. What do
you know?
Except later, it got shown that he was
actually working for Mossad, who came through Jordan,
and, we'd all broke it down here.
And guess what? When the right was talking
about this as something that could be used
to talk about how the bad guy Palestinians
might be immigrating through our country because Hamas
is gonna do what Israel said they were
gonna do, it was everywhere in the right
conversation. But then, when it got shown that
he wasn't, he was actually working for Assad,
it was like on a dime.
Nobody talked about it.
Doesn't that seem interesting to you? Well, at
the very least, you can clearly see that
Israel is abusing the migration to manipulate you
or achieve their own ends because there's nothing
but endless stories showing Israel infiltrate this country
for their benefit at the expense of Americans.
But we're not allowed to talk about that
because apparently that makes you racist to show
what this government's doing to your government.
Now we also talked about this in general
on the,
January 20 24, Texas border crisis, the new
January 6th weaponized migration,
and ICJ rules merit to Israel genocide claim.
The point was weaponized migration and how the
overlap to Israel and a lot of other
aspects are very easy to prove. So I'll
include that for you to watch.
Also include this discussion overlapping this with the
current situation in in, you know, post October
7th genocide.
Israel's mass displacement of Gazans fits the strategy
of using migration as a tool of war
and it goes into overlaps of how Israel
has done this before. It's what they've done
many times.
Now here's an interesting point.
Dan Bilzerin has been circulating online today.
And and it's funny, Patrick Bet David is
the one interviewing him. This is one of
just one of the clips.
It says, Dan Bilzerin
explains why he has recently come out so
strongly against Israel and the consequences of doing
so.
And it says, they're literally trying to kick
me off the board of my company for
those tweets. And he reads some of them.
And what I find interesting is he's overlapping
this with the conversation of immigration,
I believe in the UK, but also with
the idea that Israel is, you know, counterbalancing
it as part of the problem.
Now, I the reason I think it's interesting
is because I've seen a lot of this
where people are highlighting that, look, there is
a connection here. Tommy Robinson is literally working
for Israel. It's not hard to prove. There's
something where you can see this being
driven. And what I think is interesting is
that the right side of this conversation just
is, like, almost desperately trying to ignore that.
Here's what he had to say.
Muslims aren't the problem. The open borders and
motherfuckers and the media attacking national Oh, I'm
sorry. I forgot to warn you. There's a
bunch of cussing in this video. Earmuffs for
the children watching the show.
Pushing BEI, transgenderism, and destroying moral values are
the problem. So So he just simply said
that the, you know, that it's not the
immigration is the problem or anything else you
listed. It's what the last party listed off,
which I agree with. And that's not unique
to the left as much as the paradigm
wants you to think that. But the point
is that he's highlighting
not immigration,
but simply that there is a weaponized aspect
to this. Israel is doing what they've been
doing for a long time. August 4.
If you don't put America first as a
US politician, you are committing treason.
Supporting Israel is bad for America. Netanyahu is
a convicted war criminal, and Israel is not
our ally.
We fought way too many wars for Israel,
and we certainly don't need to give them
any more money. July 25th. He's reading his
tweets, by the way, like they're supposed to
be shocking.
I mean, literally everything you just read is
an easily provable fact. The guy is literally
accused of genocide by his own people, by
every entity of every aspect of the international
organ. I mean, it's unreal.
And on top of that, that we've got
I I mean, I make a joke out
of it. That the only time the 2
party paradigm agrees is on war and we're
usually and, well, 2 things on war in
Israel, and we're usually at war because of
Israel. It's not hard to prove. But I
find it funny that Patrick McDavid is sort
of like, these are supposed to be shocking.
And at the end, he makes a point
that I'll I'll make I'll point out. These
idiots have ruined movies.
Everything they put out is literally propaganda.
And then all of a sudden, we got
scripture here. For what shall it profit
for what shall it profit a man if
he shall gain the whole world and lose
his own soul? Is this
recent,
you know, comments you're making about Israel a
recent thing, or have you always had these
beliefs?
It's more recent. I I didn't really re
I honestly don't know why. I mean, I
know why it's because it's manufactured, but it's
so strange that people don't identify, again, more
of them are now, that it's weird to
act like it's somehow untouchable. Like, I can't
believe you're criticizing Israel. Like, my god. Like,
you wanna explain that? It's like, really? Of
all things in the world right now, you
would not need to explain is why you'd
be criticizing Israel. But it's still strange how
the upper echelon of the conversation still acts
like it's some taboo.
It's because they've been engineered to think that.
It's been long term manipulation.
But the
as even,
Greenblatt accidentally
exposed,
it's a generational problem and they've lost. People
see it. It's too late. They are openly
genocidal. They are openly raping and murdering and
pillaging and torturing and that's what they're doing.
Not every Israeli or every Jew, but clearly
what they've turned that population into. Just like
in this country, which we're pulling ourselves out
of hopefully, we've become warmongers. They're driving people
to believe that war is what we continue
to do, but for freedom, for good things.
But again, I see all these things breaking
down. We have an opportunity to
change it.
Realize what a problem it was until recently,
and then
everybody was scared to say something about it.
My brother told me, like, you know, you
can't say anything about it. They'll fucking kill
you. Like, everybody
basically said that I couldn't say anything about
it. And actually This guy's got, like, a
1000000 followers, by the way, just so you
know the the reach. Now they're, like, literally,
like, trying to, like, kick me off the
board of my company because of those tweets.
They're, like, shit. Yeah. I've definitely
had a lot of, like, negative pushback,
out of my Jewish friends,
but I don't give a fuck. You know,
it's like one of those things where I
I know that it's the right thing. And
the fact that everybody else is scared to
say it
makes me, you know, feel obligated to be
vocal about it. Why? Now I I don't
know if you wanna dig into his his
his other discussions, and, you know, maybe he
thinks it's only about Jewish people.
I I I don't know. I I I
it doesn't matter in my perspective because I
don't think that there's an overlap like theirs
with Christians too. I think it's about Zionism.
Now you guys can decide for yourselves. I
know plenty of you don't think that. But
the reality, I think, is pretty easy to
prove. And so my point is what he's
saying right now is accurate. Now I I
don't know what he may be thinking something
else, but my point is what we're describing
here is Israel and what they're influencing and
what they're manipulating. It's shockingly obvious.
To make that only about Jewish people is
exactly the game of Zionism, which a lot
of Jews, more day by day, are standing
up and screaming about because it puts them
in danger. It's the right thing. So I
know that they're a fucking parasite. Like they
provide the us absolutely no value. They've done
so many things that, you know, would constitute,
you know, an act of war against us.
I mean, USS Liberty, Lebanon affair, I mean,
it can go on and on and on
and on and on.
But you know, I think they knew about
9.
I think they had JFK assassinated. The first
thing that he wanted to do, you know,
right before he died was, you know, make
APAC a foreign entity,
and not allow them to have nukes. And
then all of a sudden this fucking guy's
dead and Jack Ruby, who is Jack Rubinstein,
you know? I mean, it's just like, like,
and then you just, I don't know, man.
I I can't ignore
all the shit that they've done. They sold
their secrets. Netanyahu lied to us about weapons
of mass destruction. We fought all these fucking
wars. My friends have died over there. Like,
you know, and
I just look at what they provided us
with and it's fucking it's it's not nothing.
It's like a negative, you know, it's not
even if they just didn't do jack shit.
That would be, you know, bad, but they've
actually done things to hurt us over and
over and over again. So, like, this whole
thing of their our greatest ally is just
complete fucking bullshit.
And it's crazy again that we can't just
collectively acknowledge that. It's overwhelmingly
obvious. I mean, there's I bet I'm willing
to bet you anybody out there who might
go, wow. That can't be true. I I
if we just sat down and laid this
stuff out from directly from corporate media platforms
or whatever, it's everywhere.
How many times they have been spying on
Americans, cheated the US government,
stolen information, sold it to our enemies, assassinated
pea I mean, it's on it's incredible. And
that's just the that's the provable side of
it. I mean, that's not the provable. That's
the public surface level side of it. Now
today, it's I mean, it's all provable. Now
the reality
just beneath that surface is also coming out.
It's all been provable for a very long
time. But isn't it crazy?
It's it's things like the USS Liberty, the
people that were there, the survivors of that,
the veterans of USS Liberty will tell you
anybody that will listen, that they tried to
kill them and our government covered it up.
But yet we go, no. You can't say
that.
It's crazy. It is incredible. I'm this is
why a lot of us are so blown
away that it's actually beginning to get dismantled.
And, you know, we send them a $100,000,000,000,
then they send APAC a $100,000,000,000,
and then they distribute it to our politicians.
And every politician is a little fucking APAC
handler walking around and tell him what to
fucking say and how to Now that's Thomas
Massie, by the way. It is very easy
to prove. I mean, even before he said
that. But the point is that he made
that very public in an interview which was
that every one of them had their APAC
guy. And every one of them get they
get tapped and they they that's, you know,
basically it shows influence and control over their
policy and they're they admit this.
It's on the surface.
Boat. And it's just like, look, I donate,
like, a 100 grand to politicians,
you know, and they call me up. Like,
hey. You need anything? Like, every week. I
don't need shit. I fucking sit on my
ass. I'm gonna do anything. I don't care.
I don't fucking break any laws. I don't
need any favors. Like, I just gave it
to them because they didn't wanna see any
more fucking retard, you know, Democrats in there.
So,
you know, but that's a 100,000, like, what
does a 100,000,000 buy you? How many fucking
phone calls do those guys get? Exactly. You
know? And so, like, I just know how
it works, and the system is broken. Like,
these people get in an office, and they
don't have very much money. They get out
of office with fucking tens or 100 of
1,000,000 of dollars. It's not a fucking accident.
Right? Is it What I think is interesting
too is that, obviously, he's clear you can
hear about what he's saying. He's clearly, I
would argue I don't wanna assume, but it
seems like he's a republican, or at least
conservative. And he clearly has a negative view
of democrats, which I I agree, but my
I have negative view of all of them.
So left and right con combined.
But what's interesting though is that where he's
coming from is it is a stance that
a lot of Republicans would be they would
call him an anti Semite. Maybe even a
lefty. Isn't that interesting? And on top of
that, what he's saying is that that they
are the problem. And so what I what
I don't know how he then views the
Republicans that say otherwise. Does he think that
they're rhinos? You know what I mean? It's
it's interesting. I'm I'm not there to ask
him, so I don't know. But I find
it interesting that this deviation is happening. And
it this is where people in this involved
are getting uncomfortable with it. And, I mean,
like, the power structures that are desperate to
keep us held in this.
Is that an Israel thing, or is that
anybody? Because China's doing the same thing. Oh,
and this is an important point. So it
just kinda shows you the, you know, Patrick
Beck David just kinda doesn't know what he's
talking about here. Money, and they get out
of office with fucking tens or 100 of
1,000,000 of dollars. It's not a fucking accident.
Right? Is is that an Israel thing, or
is that anybody? Because China's doing the same
thing. China doesn't have their thing. They don't
have an APAC.
Like Right. Israel is the only one that
has a fucking like, a lobby in the
US fucking, you know, giving these politicians money.
Okay. No. And don't forget, we literally played
the it's MSNBC for crying out loud. That
it's not because we trust MSNBC, it's because
they're facts, whoever says it, showing you that
they
shifted.
Right? APAC shifted from just kind of general
lobbying to, like, direct financial in in campaign
funding. That's just that's crazy. And it's odd
it's it's different than anything else. It just
it it shows desperation, guys. They are pushing
to the limits because they know they're failing.
That's what that is. And so it just
shows you that the, you know, the average
person doesn't even know that or even this
journalist doesn't know that. Every country, the big
ones all have lobbyists. They they all have
lobbying that they're doing Not in the US.
They're registered as foreign entities.
Right. I mean, if you're talking about are
you go And I and I'll be clear.
I would want to argue that there are
lobbying groups that are probably either have the
interest in mind of somebody else. But at
the end of the day, it's not a
publicly stated
is like, we're a China lobbying group lobbying
for the interest of China as Americans. That
just doesn't it's it's special in a very
dangerous way. Going to the dual citizen part
with big ones all have lobbyists. They they
all have lobbying that they're doing Not in
the US. They're registered as foreign entities.
Right. I mean, if you're talking about, are
you going to the dual citizenship part with
Israel, you know, Israel? That's another problem is
is a lot of our So he conflates
the idea of dual citizenship with the idea
that APAC should be registered as a foreign
agent. I'm like,
why? You know, it just kills us. Wish
TLF could have that reach and that platform,
right, with all the you know, it's like
it's amazing to me the lack of understanding
intelligence from a lot of people out there
with major platforms. But, hey, I I I
shouldn't be hating. At least he's out there
talking to him. At least he's having this
conversation.
But it's frustrating. Right? There's so many people
out there that are on the cusp of
something that just, you know, it kills me.
And if you're talking about, are you going
to the dual citizenship park with Israel, you
know, Israel That's another problem is is a
lot of our politicians have far more allegiance
to Israel than they did the United States.
I mean, that's a whole another issue as
well. It's true. It's not about racism. It's
obviously a very it's an easy very like,
when you've got people that are literally part
of the IDF who actually constantly advocate for
things that are even unconstitutional as long as
it promotes Israel, Brian Mass and plenty of
others. You're you are literally acting against your
country. That that isn't and whether it was
Israel or Britain or anybody else, it's the
same dynamic. But they'll love to try to
make it about racism because it shows you
how weak they are.
So here is a clip that I recently
played from Adam Green,
which overlaps this with the prophetic side of
this. Now realize, the Ben Gavirs of the
world, the Smotrichs, the religious Zionism party, the
most I mean, if not all of the
the major, the leading the coalition, the Knesset,
the the Likud party, Netanyahu's
coalition. They
are almost they they're the they have the
mindset of
the prophecy.
The idea that this is bringing on the
end times. And this this they've stated this
publicly, guys. The idea that ultimately we're in
a position now where we need to drive
this into reality.
That we need to
drive
the Christians to be annihilated, which is what
they actually believe because that'll bring on the
end times. But it's good for Christians too
because it's it'll bring on, you know, gee,
the return of god. But the interesting part
is that Christian Zionists see it as the
Jews being annihilated, which will bring on the
end times.
Point, though, is here is a rabbi
speaking, and he's reasonably prominent one, speaking about
how weaponized migration
is being driven because this is what they're
trying to accomplish.
So it's just something for you to consider.
It doesn't prove anything, but ask whether this
is part of the con I mean, I
think you know I think that. It's not
just Israel, but every one of these elements,
whether it's the UK and the US keeping
it going because they wanna be able to
continue exploiting these countries for their maintain the
maintenance of their own countries, or if it's
somebody else driving it to be able to
destabilize or driving on the end time, whatever
it is, you can see that these powerful
entities are actually stoking this. Not left or
right, but your governments.
End of days, you're gonna need
the iron
of Hisav,
which represents Edom, which is the west,
Europe, and the Americas
to get intermixed
with Ishmael, which is basically Arabs and Muslims.
How in the world was this ever gonna
happen if not for this refugee crisis? At
the end of days you're gonna have this
intermixing between Esav,
Edom, which is the West, and the East,
which is the Muslims and the,
and and the Arabs,
making this through this influx into the world.
They're gonna have a far larger birth rate
than the indigenous people there, and and they're
going
to sort of conquer by number. And there
are many different sources for this where there
will be many, many people killed and so
on and so forth. So
the idea of having these refugees come into
Europe, it's no longer a matter of whether
it's right or wrong. It's just simply a
fulfillment of what it was meant to be
all wrong. This is a fulfillment of, you
know, the rehazal and the prophecies.
You we have to be able to consider
that at some level, this might be Coke.
Like, let's just even say you think it's
all organic.
You you don't we're not gonna we're not
gonna at least consider that the the people
like Ben Gavir and Smotrich who are just
I mean, these guys are psychopaths, ladies and
gentlemen. They have come out and shown you
this. They have praised rape and called them
heroes and acted like people should be murdered
in their beds because they're animals.
You don't think for one second that they
might not drive that? Even if it's organic,
then come and stoke those flames because they
see an opportunity. If not, completely manufacture
it because they've said so in the past.
Like, Net and Yahoo and others have had
leaked videos where they tell you that they
they will they can use the United States
however they want. They can control the left
right paradigm because they're easy to manipulate because
the it it's constant. All of these videos
are out there. I've shown them to you.
So with this kind of overlap, we have
to ask whether we are simply being used.
And that the left right paradigm are just
extensions of that being used.
This has to happen, and this is just
another sign that we are nearing, you know,
the completion of the sequel of the entire
world. But we know one thing. Right? That
when it comes to the classic Rome,
you know, which is Europe,
they're finished.
And you don't have to be a prophet
or a great analysis for that. You have
to open the view, the the
the the TV or or the Internet and
see that exactly what was prophesied then, that
the sons of Ishmael are gonna go and
cause cause havoc around the world. So France
is completely barbecued,
England is next, now half of Europe is
completely
com
half dead. Now look what's going on in
America.
So, you know, now in a country knee
knee near you. Asking what's gonna be with
the guy And and again, this idea that
these people are somehow inherently lesser than, like,
it's explicit in Israel Israeli ideology. They treat
their Ethiopian Jews
as lesser than and second class citizens. It's
openly discussed.
Let alone or or zi Orthodox Jews that
don't believe in Zionism are literally beaten up
in the streets. I'll I have a clip
they'll show tomorrow where they have Zionists burning
down the houses of anti Zionist orthodox Jews
in Israel
right
now because it's not about Judaism. It's about
Zionism. My point is that they it's inherent
in their ideology.
They are racist. That's that is Zionism. Zionism
is racism.
Zionism
is racism.
Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either
a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody, and
that's what I would like Israel to be.
I'd like
a democratic solution, one state with equal rights
for,
all its inhabitants.
Your organization, Human Rights Watch, issued
a report last year,
about
Israel,
and the conclusion was it is an apartheid
state.
And there are 4 major
human rights groups in the last 2 years
who issued similar reports
reach the same conclusion.
Israel
is an apartheid state. So
apartheid
is racism.
Apartheid
is discrimination.
But
Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know
which is officially racist.
And I say this
because of the,
July
2018
nation state law, which says
the Jews
have
a unique unique right to serve the termination
in Israel.
Unique means exclusive. Yes. It means Arabs have
no right to serve the termination.
Mhmm. It means even if Arabs became a
majority,
they would still have no right to serve
the termination. Mhmm. So most certainly,
Zionism
is a,
is a racist ideology
and it is largely responsible
for the Anakba
that has unfolded throughout the last century and
continues today.
And that is Avi Islam, a highly respected
British Israeli historian,
speaking with Human Rights Watch about the apartheid
state that Israel is based on literally every
leading human rights group in the world, including
Israeli B'Tselem.
But the point is, to what I was
saying, is that clearly they're racist. Like, that's
on the surface. And so what we have
is the bleeding into that of other conversations
in the in other
like, what's interesting is that historically,
your entire government left and right has been
blind they still are blindly supporting Israel. But
to it used to be kind of the
other way around in an interesting way. But
but today, we just simply have it's shifting
more from within them. Not not the actual
parties.
They're playing it based on politics, but you've
got the left largely now at least calling
out what they're seeing, and you got the
right who is more so being blinded. But
I think it's like with COVID 19, it's
not as partisan they want you to think
it is. It is slanted, but it's not
the same. My point though is that if
we pretend that this is what they're making
it out to be here, all these, you
know, hordes of
immigrants running in, it's all you know, based
on the idea that somehow they're lesser than.
Right? That they're meant to do this because
they're the
unwashed hordes or whatever they're calling them in
their clips. And one of them said something
like that.
That they're,
like, destined to play this role. Like, there's
a level of racism there that you cannot
ignore.
And and then when you add in the
reality that this is being driven to happen,
whether it's by belligerent foreign policy or something
much more nefarious,
how does that add up?
If you're manufacturing the very thing that you're
pointing at, it's not then it's not even
like, this is the same as saying God
gave them Israel when literally it was Britain,
and they were choosing between multiple locations, the
Balfour Declaration. You can't go on pretending like
it was God given when you chose the
location and it was given to you by
another government. But it's the same thing. That's
what Zionism does,
manipulates you.
Going on in America.
So, you know, now in a country knee
knee near you. Asking, what's gonna be with
the Goyim when Moshiach comes? Will they be
destroyed and annihilated?
Someone asked, who
cares? Okay.
As a nation, they'll cease to exist even
as individuals. Every individual,
most survivors,
not only as a nation, they'll cease to
exist, even as individual. In modern term analogy,
they call it
cultural genocide.
They'll be annihilated as a
they basically learn there's gonna be cultural genocide.
You know what? The goyim is the goyim
as they exist as goyim bifniaszma,
that's
done with.
Yep. Now to be clear obviously,
that's just one person,
right? And a lot of these, you know,
typically the ones that are shown the the
rabbi's in, there were lot of them are
very extreme. But let's realize that the majority
in this conversation coming from the Zionist controlled
Israel are extreme.
That's evident by what they're doing right now
and what their government almost by and large
is okay with.
You you just don't see from the highest
level of corporate media a debate about whether
it's okay to rape people and calling them
heroes in without recognizing that there's something very
dark happening with that society at the very
highest level. And not just one or the
other. Right? But, like, the entirety.
Like, my point is always, it's not every
Israeli or every Jew. But the reality of
where they've drifted because of what Zionism has
done is
undeniable.
They need to be saved from it, like
anybody would.
Now here,
this brings us into the conversation of what,
at least in one part, this is being
driven to accomplish.
Now this is just one element of it.
This is the one that I think is
the easiest to see, which is why we've
talked about it more than once. The idea
of from the and, actually, I'll include the
Sayback conversation as well. From the American perspective,
the idea of using immigration
to manipulate people into asking for the very
things we were fighting against during COVID 19.
In this case, a digital identification.
SAVE Act, Real ID, and ID 2020.
This is the Real ID Act conversation
where they have this included in the SAVE
Act where this is one of the
basically, to break it down quickly, there are
multiple options, most of which are most people
won't apply for or won't be it won't
apply to them.
And then the Real ID part of it
is gonna be what is used going forward,
especially when some of these get knocked off
as they become not possible anymore. And then
we've got retroactively or rather kind of grandfathered
in this idea that this is the only
thing you're allowed to use. Of course, to
stop illegal immigrants from voting. That's all it
was about. Which I agree. People aren't legally
allowed to vote. We should care about that.
But you don't need the digital ID aspect
of this to pass this bill. But that's
what that's what they're doing anyway. It's a
Trojan horse for, as I said, using the
2 party illusion and the election to usher
in digital IDs.
Here
is Whitney Webb saying, first of all, Disclose
TV posting this saying, no. The US Office
of Biometric Identity Management
plans to, quote, improve facial recognition technology for
minors by collecting biometric data from immigrant children
down to the infant. Now before everyone jumps
and goes, that's what Biden and the democrats
do. This largely was pushed forward during the
republicans' control.
The idea that the we need to protect
the innocent children during the might you know,
the immigrants and the the,
m s 13 and the, you know, the
the coyotes and all that. And look, I
agree with the fact that we need the
again, it's one of these elements that is
completely allowed and exploited by the power structures,
but the idea that we don't need more
biometric scans and more digital IDs to stop
that problem.
This is only a using something that we
care about.
Same thing it's like the same with the
the safety bill about children and child pornography.
They're using what we care about, which we
all should care about. Stopping these absolute creeps
out there that are doing this stuff, but
using that to can manipulate you into asking
for censorship.
Giving them the tools to do it.
So the point is that this is it
is a bi
bipartisan, as always, because it's just your government
push
for biometric
scans,
for digital ID,
technological control.
She writes, there is no way
that this remains inclusive to immigrants.
Completely agree.
Both parties are pushing a biometric entity entry
exit system. That is the new biometric wall.
Funny how they all ended up agreeing on
that. Isn't that interesting? That will lead to
biometric digital ID. There is a truly global
push for this, and if you want to
stop the technocratic agenda 2030,
you must do all you can to opt
out.
As you may have another recent, well, I
think it was a clip that was from
that same interview with Jamie Dore. And one
of the points was that, like, woah. What
are we gonna do? Everyone takes your data.
So wait. That's not the truth, though.
If all you think are the main platforms,
there are only things that are there, well,
then yes.
And if you act like that's gonna allow
you to just go, well, well, too late.
It's already happening. Well, then you're just you're
just letting it happen. There's a lot of
other platforms that may not be as major
and prominent at the moment that we should
lean into because they don't ask for that
information.
The problem is the same thing as always.
The people that are stuck at the top
of the paradigm who want you to believe
they're on the side of freedom, when really
they're on the side of maintaining the status
quo,
act like you should listen. It's the same
as always. It's the same names at the
top of either side of this that are
weirdly connected to the CIA and tapped into
the same groups, but we trust them like
they're somehow in outsiders now,
pushing you into the same position.
Now maybe you'd like to think they're gonna
change it, but it's funny. We can look
back over 20 years. No sane people have
always been there, and yet we still get
stuck in this hamster wheel because that's how
it's designed.
Opting out is how we need to do
this.
Now, we should I'll include that one as
well. I'll also include this. Oh, wait.
Oh, I think I just lost it. Shoot.
There's one more. It was what Paulie said.
Let's see if it's still there.
Nice. Okay. Sometimes it won't let you go
back. So after Whitney said this about opting
out,
Polly of FringeView says, ditch your smartphone.
Imagine if the big influencers all promoted a
smartphone strike.
Cancel the data plans in mass.
This would cost the control system in terms
of dollars and implementation of their strategy. It's
a good point.
But it'll never happen, unfortunately,
because all of the big influencers
are invested in these things.
For example, like, I I I myself just
lit a fire into my butt because I
was mad at myself for not doing that,
even though I've had this for a long
time. That's why I had the recent interview
with with Hakim,
technocratic surveillance, privacy devices, and opting out of
the control system, where if you watch the
interview, I I really enjoy it. We talk
about some really interesting things to start.
We talk about the privacy point. I I
bought the above phone a long time ago.
And it just again, no excuse, but it's
just busy. There's a lot going on and
I get it. But my point is that
shouldn't have been enough to stop me. So
I now have it sitting right here next
to me. And I've been trying to fold
it in in every way that I can,
even if it takes extra time.
And, again, like I briefly pointed out, we're
gonna come back to you once it's available.
They're they're gonna make a TLav laptop. It's
an above, they call it an above book.
DGoogle privacy
set up as if it was made for
me. Having all the apps in different space
and what I would argue is best suited
for somebody starting in this field.
Watch out for that. I'm excited about it
because I believe in this product. And on
that note, if you either of these things
you wanna get right now before that, there's
the code for it. And if you do,
there's the the link and then use t
lab 50 as a code to get $50
off. I really do believe this is the
direction. Whether you use this phone or something
else, I believe that we should be going
in this direction. This is part of opting
out of the system.
Now where this is going,
it's happening in the United States. As I
just said, the SAVE Act and everything else
is driving us there right now. But as
always, they use these vassal states to drive
this in and normalize the conversation when it's
all coming to you soon. It's already happening
in a lot of ways in the US,
in the UK. As Camus is pointing out,
it's already there.
In Australia, it's happening in the UK. It's
driving out it's it's not some hypothetical.
It's not even some kind of, like, subtle
conversation. It's digital ID act being pushed on
everybody right now. Here it is in Australia.
As he says, Australians won't have to pull
out their license oh, he's just he's quoting
what the video says.
Australians won't have to pull out their license
at the pub anymore under a gold standard
digital ID being developed. Government services minister Bill
Shorten is today unveiling the new initiative.
It means when you enter a club or
hotel, a digital token will be sent to
that business to verify you are who you
say you are without transferring them your data.
It also cracks down on scammers by limiting
data shared with businesses.
And here is one
from the UK.
So, the point is simply that they're piping
this like convenience and benefit, and at the
end of the day, it's it's surveillance and
control. It's all it is.
Labor's,
digital ID act is an extreme risk honeypot,
he says, of information, which I don't know
if honeypot applies to this. But you listen
to what he says, and you and maybe
that's used differently in in other locations.
Oh, no. So this is oh, never mind.
I believe this is the Australia as well.
I thought I had one for the UK.
But the point is clearly that it's across
the world, guys. It is happening all over
the world.
Not left or right. Not one country versus
the other. It's just a role it's just
like with the COVID 19 thing. There's something
much more nefarious happening around all of this.
And if you're
allowing yourself to be driven into it because
of some tangential conversation based on left right
divide, you're being played.
Remember that COVID app that came out from
the Morrison government cost us about 70,000,000
had about 2 men and a dog take
it up. It was an absolute shocker.
I'm not so
confident the government's gonna get this right. I'm
worried about my information.
What do you think?
Yeah. Well, Peter, you should be worried about
your information. We all should be. I mean,
there's a number of different layers to this.
The first one is,
this digital ID act that was passed earlier
in the year is setting up the framework
for a digital surveillance state in this country.
And it wasn't that long ago in the
eighties when people were marching the streets about
the Australia card. But we've now seen the
Australia card in digital form on steroids roll
out. And many of us who oppose that
that bill going through
made the warning that this would become
mandatory very quickly. I mean, the act says
it doesn't, but this will creep into our
everyday lives. And within months, the Albanese government
is rolling out a new version of the
same thing. So So that's the first thing.
People being tracked is the first thing. The
second thing I'd say is I have no
confidence in governments being able to keep our
data safe. I mean, the private sector struggles
enough. We've seen numerous data breaches over the
private sector and we've seen numerous on parliament
house hacks and all sorts. So this is
a massive honeypot of data that will be
built for hackers who will just go to
this like moth to a flame. This is
a really bad idea. That's why I've introduced
a digital ID repeal bill into the Senate
and it's been co sponsored by a number
of other senators, Canavan Babbitt and others, and
Robert Dan Hansen, I should say.
And, this is bad law and we are
walking into a digital surveillance state trap in
this country.
Yep. Completely agree. Here's Nigeria
digital identification management program.
It's coming up all over the world. It
all include one of, Derek's.
Let's see.
There it is. Well, there's one of them.
And I guess this one too.
So this is simply the idea. Derek's written
about this a lot. This is from 2022.
Exposing the digital ID is a human right
scam. Very important. That picture is perfect.
This is the one that I think is
most important. I mean, it's so crazy how
this has been called out directly. This is
the NYU School of Law.
Literally warns, direct quote from them, that digital
ID is, quote, paving a digital road to
hell.
Didn't mince words at all, did they? I
mean, that's crazy to me. It's all right
there.
You know? And this is not, like, some
conspirator. This is a simple reality of why
there's no logical reason what they claim they
need these things for are always shown to
be half measures at best. This is about
controlling you.
Now include Whitney's article from the from the,
February 20 24, manufacturing consent, the border fiasco
and the smart wall.
It's very well done and just simply continues
to show you what we've always talked about.
They use the 2 party divide to drive
their agenda, the governments,
back and forth and it teeter totters and
they act you guys act like you're pushing
back and fighting each other and it perfectly
distills it right down to where they wanna
go every time.
Until we can see through the paradigm, we
will not be able to stop what's happening.
And it's happening. I'm seeing it. People are
seeing through it, but the ideologues at the
top are continuing to keep people stuck.
And I it's hard to see because it's
it's just like with COVID. You all, well,
we're all alone.
I'm the only one that sees this. And
the truth was we all saw it. But
the media and the paradigm is very good
at keeping you only looking at the very
small percentage of people that they pretend is
everyone.
That's where we're gonna get to this ridiculous
list for social media. Well, then, like, here's
the top 30 smartest
truth tellers. And it's like, my god. That's
the fake window right there. We'll come back
to that.
Now let's talk about
the idea
of the recent Donald Trump anti you know,
you know, fighting anti semitism part of his
campaign tour. That's what I was trying to
say earlier in the show, campaign tour. I
can't remember that.
But we just talked we had a great
interview with David Icke a while ago about
as our title, the Zionist infiltration of Judaism
weaponized migration, also in that conversation, and mainstream
alt media. He's talking about the mams as
he talk as he calls Alex Jones, Tucker
Carlson, all the rest of them. He because
they're all he think he thinks they're all
fake. And the point
is that in this conversation, we talk about
Saboteanism and
the roots of Zionism and the and the
point being the infiltration
of governments and religions.
That's exactly what we're talking about and whether
or not this is playing a factor. So
let's talk about that exact conversation.
Here's Donald Trump on the tour, campaign tour.
Now, yes, this one what's important is that
people are framing this as some kind of
anti semitism,
like,
convention or something. Let's be clear about this.
This is you could see his Trump dance
podium.
This is something it let this is something
put on by him and his campaign as
well as Miriam Alderson.
Now she probably paid for it all because
that's how this is working, but let's not
pretend like this is just him coming to
speak at somebody else's event. His podium is
there for his campaign.
And the point is this is part of
that because she is his what if not
the one of his chief financiers.
I'll show you why.
But the reason I'm saying all of that
is because as this person rightly asks, can
MAGA explain to me why are we flying
Israeli flags on the campaign trail
again?
So even if you wanna pretend that's not
what's happening here, it it's it's not new,
and it should worry you.
He's in the United States on tour for
his American presidential campaign, and yet it's weird
that he well, he got more and more
American flags than Israel. Doesn't that worry you?
Doesn't that seem strange?
Would would it would it be weird if
they were all Moroccan flags
Or Chinese flags? Or British flags? Well, it
would if any one of those were there.
But weirdly enough, when it's Israeli, you go,
who cares? I'm not gonna look. Blah blah
blah. I don't wanna see it.
Clearly, it's weird.
And I think it's self it's self evident,
self explanatory.
Israel has a I'm gonna let you listen
directly from his own mouth.
He says things that are probably gonna blow
your mind.
And it's usually because I think he's off
the cuff and he says things that kinda
just pop into his head. And one of
the things I'll he well, during his speech,
it's so funny how he just kinda rambles
and and he oh, he starts his conversations
by going and they've like, they were blown
away and then, like
he like, then he fills the gap. I'll
show you what I mean. It's funny, but
side point. He's just hyperbolic with everything he
does. And it's funny how he just starts
like that and then fills it in with
what someone's gonna say next and deviates. It's
funny. But here,
this is about Israel having a influence over
what he does.
At the very least, funding a presidential campaign
on every side, by the way, because Kamala
is in the same position despite the framing.
But we're right now, because I'm gonna I'll
give you a point about Kamala at the
at latter point of this. But here's the
reason why at this point, I'm focusing more
on Trump and the right. Because
it's obvious to me at least that I
think this is the plan.
The the whole point is that your government
has selected this person to be in power.
I know not everybody agrees with that. I
don't think your vote translates. So that's why
when I think the game is to Kamala
as a clown, who's a ridiculous airhead, at
least that's what she's projecting, because even her
own party hates her, and now you're being
gaslit at thinking she saw my because even
her own party hates her. And now you're
being
gaslit at thinking she's some amazing thing. What
that's gonna do is drive people to support
anybody else. That's what I see it as.
But on top of that, because I think
Kamala Harris is transparently obvious.
I think her own party thinks she's ridiculous.
I think everybody can see that she's blindly
supportive of Israel, that she has a terrible
track record. So I don't need to expose
that. So it's like trying to expose that
Biden is senile. That's obvious. The problem is
that a lot of good people are falling
for Donald Trump, and I think that is
what I need to highlight.
And if you think that's somehow gonna drive
people to vote for Kamala, then I again,
you don't understand my opinion. I don't think
that's how this is working, but
you consider your opinion too. I could be
wrong.
So here's what censored man has to say
about this first. Donald Trump attends at the
way he frames it, I don't think this
is necessarily accurate, attends a stop antisemitism event
with Miriam Adelson.
That's partly accurate, but I this is part
of his campaign. That's that's clear to me.
But either way, let's just take take a
conversation that that's he's still attending a stop
antisemitism event. So remember this, people on the
right, who were just you just went through
years of being called racist Nazis because you
wore a red hat,
or anti semites because you wore a red
hat?
Can't we ask? And by the way, got
censored because you were called anti semites? Got
censored because you were called nazis even though
that wasn't true?
I know you're all out there listening and
I know a lot of you get what
I'm saying, a lot of conservatives.
But you out there listening who see that
problem, who see Trump and the republicans, the
leading entities out there turning around and doing
the same thing,
you need to call them out.
Whether it's Tucker or Alex or people on
Fox News or the president himself,
you need to go, you're doing the same
thing. That's unconstitutional.
By by leaning in to stop antisemitism,
by the way, which they claim is free
Palestine,
you're ridiculous.
You're part of the problem. The problem is
that a lot of people that are trapped
in the paradigm don't want to say that
because they think that's counter to their interest
even though it's true.
So if you are a conservative out there
and you recognize that's a dangerous weaponized thing
he's being a part of, call it out.
Don't be afraid of the cat turd weaponized,
you know, the whole MAGA thing that goes,
Kyle Rittenhouse, you said something true, but it's
bad for MAGA. So you're out. You're a
you're
annexed. You're
exiled
unless you retract it. We'll let you back
in. Like, that's cult stuff, guys. That's cult
level stuff.
Saying that Trump has things he's done that
are problematic for the second amendment is easy
to prove. You know, like, we'll take the
guns first and deal with due process later.
But you're not allowed to say that because
Baga,
just like the left, it's the same game.
They're both ridiculous.
The point here is that you need to
call this stuff out or it's only gonna
get worse. He goes on to say, Miriam
donated a $100,000,000.
Oh, and that's just for this campaign, by
the way, to Trump's campaign. And I'll go
over why. It's because she wants annexation of
the West Bank, as Harrettes is telling us.
That's illegal. Nobody can say otherwise. It's easily
provable.
But he goes on to say after making
the donation, she urged Trump to allow Israel
to annex the West Bank and prevent the
creation of Palestinian state.
By the way, which is exactly the opposite
of what Trump championed his whole thing about.
Remember the deal of the century was supposed
to be a state for the Palestinians? I
guess now he was paid to not want
that anymore. That's politics for you. Her late
and by the way, the deal of the
century was a joke. It all it did
was enshrine the current reality before October 7th
as the new deal and called it a
2 state solution which Israel stole control over.
That's why nobody thought it was they pretended
like it was the thing that's gonna change
the world and everybody laughed about it. It
it didn't go anywhere because it wasn't real.
It was a fake. But my point is
even the fake 2 state solution, he's now
being paid to not want. Now it says
her late husband, Sheldon Adelson, flew Jonathan Pollard
to Israel
on her private jet after he was arrested
from prison in the United States or released
from prison after being arrested. Pollard was arrested
for committing espionage
against the United States for Israel,
Like any number of many examples we can
prove, during which he gave US intelligence
to the Soviets in exchange for allowing Russian
Jews to immigrate to Israel.
His point is, she
took him back to Israel.
Because it's all about Israel's interest, especially at
the detriment to the United States. As they'll
proudly talk about when you're not looking,
here is what Jake Shields points out. Trump
is at a stop antisemitism rally. Again, which
is his rally too
with Adelson. Adelson is a dual citizen of
Israel who just gave Trump a $100,000,000.
Jonathan Pollard was the worst spy in the
US history. When Pollard was released,
Adelson's the one that picked him up. The
the the the, Sheldon. This is Miriam, her
her the 4 the late Sheldon's wife
with a private jet flew into Israel where
he got her hero's welcome. This isn't someone
with dual loyalty, that is someone who has
full loyalty to Israel and none to America.
That's for you to decide but I think
it's quite obvious that should be problematic for
people. But so let's take a look at
some of the things he said.
This is very problematic to me. Says Trump
speaks at fight anti semitism event.
If it was fight anti semitism event, it
would say, fight anti semitism event. That says,
Trump fans. Text Trump to it's a Trump
this is a put on for Trump's rally.
This is about Trump getting elected. So let's
not pretend
for those that wanna pretend like he didn't
do the it's exactly what it looks like.
The power, Miriam,
of this lobby, this powerful and it was
for the for the good, not for bad
of, being Jewish and of Israel.
And He's talking about the Israeli lobby, by
the way. Unfortunately, they're not
same because you have Jewish people living in
New York who really don't support. You look
at the New York Times, and they do
not support Israel, and I don't think they
support Jewish people. You wanna know the truth?
Uh-oh.
Right? You're not supposed to say that out
loud,
that there are Jewish people that don't support
Israel. Oops. Because it's very real. It's a
massively growing community.
But, of course, he has to add that
I don't even think they care about Jewish
people. Also, they're Jews that don't care about
Jewish people. That makes a lot of sense.
That's the whole safe held hating Jew dynamic
where we're not allowed to say that because
we're racist, but Jew like, people like Ben
Shapiro can say that about Jews who are
Jewish, who are very religious, but he doesn't
agree with their the way they view Zionism
so therefore, they're not Jews. All you can
see from that is it's about Zionism, not
about Judaism. And that's the thing he's doing
right there. He's denigrating Jewish people who don't
believe in Zionism because he's speaking to a
bunch of rabid Zionists. That's what's happening here.
And you wonder where it all came from,
but why
why did it come and they have to
get together? They have to be strong. The
because it's never been under attack. He's rambling,
by the way, and you always get this.
And anybody honest is gonna highlight this. He
doesn't even know what he's saying right there.
He's filling the gap until he goes into
a new point, which now he starts. Like
this. It's never been under siege like this.
But 15 years ago, it was the absolute
most powerful. You could The lobby where he
just didn't finish the sentence. And I'm gonna
show you that he's made this point in
many times.
The lobby used to be powerful, which should
be, rightly so, control over the government. But
it's because of these new people that they
don't. That's what he's talking about. Have an
AOC plus 3. They wouldn't have a chance
of being elected anywhere.
Oops.
Did he literally just say that before when
the lobby was that powerful, they wouldn't have
had a chance to be elected? Yes. He
did. On the record, just literally said they're
getting people elected. They are the reason that
if they back when they were the what
they should be, and I'll play this clip
for you next. He says it here too,
that they wouldn't have been able to get
elected. So wait a minute. So are you
telling me Donald Trump that the people don't
elect the the people in congress, but the
lobby does? Yes. And by the way, I
shouldn't have to prove that to anybody.
All that's important here is to show you
that Donald Trump just openly stated, because he's
rambling,
the exact thing you're not supposed to say.
2, in fact. Well, the the the lot
of Jewish people don't support Israel, but that
the lobby is so powerful and should be
based on his recommendation.
And because of them, they're not. They wouldn't
be elected if they were powerful like he
wants to make them again.
Democracy. Right, guys?
And today, you have
AOC and some of these people, and they're,
pretty violent. Pretty vile Oh, they're violent now?
Because, you know, they support Muslims. They must
be violent.
Now look, I don't support any of these
people. And a lot of their ridiculous woke
ideologies than they support they do support or
what they pretend they do for their own
political interest. You know, that goes both ways.
The bottom line is they have supported a
lot of very dangerous things that, in fact,
have led to a lot of violence. So
is Donald Trump. Just because the right only
wants to look at it through the lens
of the left and the black lives matter.
Look at what the right is doing in
the same exact way. Whether it's
destructive foreign policy and supporting things that Israel
was doing or having things happen in the
same way from what they like the the
conversation of the immigrant discussion. It's the same
way or the way you look at it.
Both sides disagree and that's why we end
up in the middle, you know, with the
rest of logical people that can see through
the lies.
But the bottom line is that calling them
violent
is it's just it's I mean, it's
it's the same as them calling him a
Nazi.
And I don't know why honest people that
are in the paradigm can't see that because
there are a lot of them. You have
to recognize how hypocritical it is for you
to scream about them doing this and misrepresenting
Trump when he does it every time he
speaks.
And please do not hear this as bad
guy. They're all on the same level.
And they hate Israel and they hate Jewish
people. Oh, so now they all hate Jewish
people.
Seriously? Do you realize how many Jewish people
that are supporting them? How many Jewish organizations
they're standing with as they point at what
Israel's doing and the genocide they're committing?
Guys, it's I mean, you as an average
person, if you're able to pull yourself out
of your paradigm perspective, that should insult you.
As a Jew especially.
You're telling me that they hate you. What
about Jews' voices for peace? Who they're marching
with as they call out the is the
genocide that's making Jews less safe? Or the
fact that Zionism is the most dangerous thing
for Jews in the world today and that
that's what they're calling out. Now I'm not
gonna say I know whether they hate something
or don't, but for you to say that
they hate Jewish people because they're criticizing Israel
shows you how he's going to weaponize antisemitism.
At the very least, allow them to do
it to you.
But, you know, constitutional
rights and America first. Right?
And,
he gonna end up winning because
you're gonna have the president. Okay? So you're
gonna end up winning. Don't worry, Zionist audience.
You're gonna have the president.
You think that was accidental?
You could you know, as always, they're gonna
say that. You that's not what he means.
You're reading into maybe you're right. Maybe you're
right. But he just went on to tell
me that the lobby should be this powerful
as I'll play for you next, so actually
right now. And that if it was that
powerful, they wouldn't even be elected, which shows
you that they're electing people or not. But
then you say, but don't worry. You're gonna
have the president, so it'll all be good.
You tell me how that doesn't add up
to an exactly clear picture.
Now let me play this for you real
quick. We'll come back to this. Here, as
I've showed you before, is him saying this
in 2 other instances. So it's not new,
it's not unique, and it's not a misspoken
word. You know, the biggest, change I've seen
in congress is Israel
literally owned congress. You understand that. 10 years
ago, 15 years ago. That's supposed to be
a racist conspiracy theory. It's not it it's
exactly what we see today. It's the truth.
That's what lobbying ultimately tries to do. They
just pretend they don't. So here we have
him saying that's what they did and we
know that. And it was so powerful. It
was so powerful. And to I think you
know exactly what I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
over congress.
There's no
misunderstanding that, guys. Israel and he's not saying
Jewish people. He's saying Israel
had control
over congress, and rightly so.
Hey. But you'll have the president, guys.
You know,
Israel was the most powerful lobby
in the country 15 years ago. Today, between
Tlaib and AOC and all of these people,
what they're doing,
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. You'll give it to them. Yeah.
I have the I'm good.
I'm
Yep.
There's just no misunderstanding this, guys. He's literally
saying he's gonna give power back to Israel
over the congress. Now whether you could pretend
he doesn't mean it, you can play the
JFK card and say he's lying to get
elected, and he's gonna go he but what
happened last time? The exact opposite. Everything he
said he was gonna do didn't actually happen,
and it went right with the same deep
state agenda like they planned to. And it's
the same game right now. I'm gonna play
you the clips where he openly says, we're
gonna continue to support Israel. We're gonna continue
to allow them to do what they're doing
because we have to fight for Israel. All
of his supporters who wanna pretend that's not
the case will tell you he secretly means
we're gonna stop the war. It's not what
he's saying. You can hear him, and they
don't want that.
Very frustrating that we can't see how obvious
this is. You do have so you're gonna
end up winning you're gonna have the presidency
and some of these people and they're,
pretty violent
pretty violent. And they hate Israel and they
hate Jewish people.
And,
he can end up winning because
you're gonna have the president. Okay? So you're
gonna end up winning, but you do have
That just creeps me out, man.
If you're an American and you're watching this
as he's speaking to a bunch of Israeli
Zionists, it should worry you. You should worry
you what he's discussing about. Right? What he's
saying, you'll have the president or that they
should have control over the congress. These are
not mistakes. They're repeated sentiments.
You do have people, and it's amazing.
The radical Marxist left and the sympathizers
of the radical
Islamic terror
who Democrats have imported from all over the
world have
Well, I mean, see, this is this is
playing right into a narrative that's rooted in
like, the idea that the democrats
have pulled in all over the what are
we talking about? Everything that you're gonna highlight
that draws these migration, it's because of a
part a bipartisan
war policy.
And the idea I'll I'll make this point
really quickly actually too. I think it's a
good point that somebody made when he he
mentions Marxists.
Where was that?
Yeah. David's Dave Smith made this point. I
mean, see, this is what I appreciate. Now,
I mean, I there's stuff there's things I've
seen David that say that I disagree with,
but I tend to see him as pretty
balanced in regard to at least the 2
party paradigm. And so I appreciate that because
it's rare you find that in somebody that
is in you know, on Tucker or whatever
else. And he says, I'm getting tired of
this argument
because it devolved into semantics and, frankly, stupidity.
So let me bring it back to my
original point. He says, I don't really care
what you call the criminals who run our
government. I promise I hate them more than
you do. Whether you call them Marxist, fascist,
or whatever,
which I agree with. This game they play
with one's good and one's bad, it's all
power structures and they will all collect at
the top. Look at what we're dealing with
today.
And he says
or whatever. He says, they have bankrupt the
United States of America and driven our society
off a cliff.
Handing the baton back and forth, and the
same thing happens. He says the problem with
Trump calling them communist or Marxist
aside from being inaccurate,
it's not a left right point. It's about
facts and easy to verify stuff, he says.
And making him sound like a grandpa
arguing in the 19 forties is the framing.
He says between his position on Israel, COVID,
and even his praising of the secret service,
when Trump calls his opponents Marxist,
he positions himself as the defender of the
establishment.
Think about that. Guarding against the radicals.
Right? So it's like the red scare. Like,
we're protecting our current establishment against the outside
communist trying to take over. But he says,
this was never the appeal of Donald Trump.
People supported him because he represented a repudiation
of the Bushes, Clintons, Obamas, and the corporate
media, or at least that's what he tried
to project.
He says a giant middle finger to the
establishment.
Besides, if we are a communist country, we've
been one since 1913.
Very balanced and objective points that people see,
it's hard for people to call him a
lefty because he's clearly taking very pro very,
you know, prominent stances that are on the
other side. He's libertarian. The point is that
it's just I love being able to point
these out with a position like this from
a person that it's hard for them to
just denounce to somebody from the left because
it's easy to prove what he's saying is
right.
And the main point is think about the
dynamic.
There this is Trump from the new position
and now the new election positioning himself in
exactly where it makes it work for the
current paradigm. Before, it was against the establishment.
Right? Drain the swamp. Change everything. Now it's
to hold it and protect it against the
new how does that even make sense?
It doesn't.
People are falling for it just like last
time.
Around their hatred of America and their hatred
for Israel. They have hatred. Islamic
terror who democrats have imported from all over
the world have united around their hatred of
I guess he's just making a lazy point
about immigration
that they've imported from all around the world.
I mean, all that does is make a
lazy unverifiable claim that somehow individual Democrats or
at least half the government by themselves
imported terrorists explicitly from other countries. But isn't
the argument that they're importing it for voting,
that they're bringing in my immigration? Like, what's
the argument of bringing in terrorism? That's just
see that, again, it's lazy to connect it
with the current talking point that it's overtaking
the government. The UK is overrun with terrorists
from Muslim countries. So now we're now we're
literally arguing that they're importing terrorism for I
I'm not gonna say that's not possible. I
think they're all capable of this. In fact,
I think part of what's happening is weaponized
like I said.
But to pretend that's half the government versus
the other half of the government? I mean,
guys, how do we not see how dumb
this all is? And on top of that,
this is just a floated narrative that's probably
gonna be flooded through the lumer
ape you know, whatever that dumb dynamic is
of these people that all just scream fake
talking points they can't verify because they've got
some secret source, most of which later turns
out to not be true.
But watch, watch.
For America and the hatred for Israel, they
have hatred.
The toxic poison of anti Semitism.
Right. Because
hatred for a government that's murdering children is
because you hate Jews. Right?
Same
point. He's going to weaponize or let them
weaponize
your criticism of foreign government.
Is that okay, Americans that care about the
constitution, Republicans who believe in the constitution that
he is and other people with him like
Miriam Adelson and the rest that clearly are
blindly supporting Israel are going to tell you
they they are it's illegal to criticize Israel
or say Zionism is not Judaism or say
I mean or rather you know? Yeah. Exactly.
Say it's not or criticize Zionism at all.
Every one of these are protected under your
constitutional rights. In or or outlined by your
constitutional rights that are inherent.
Like, didn't they just pass a bill about
weaponizing antisemitism? And didn't the right just frame
that as the left trying to censor speech,
and now he's doing the same thing? God,
it's exhausting to have to point these basic
things out. I'm hoping the average people out
there are nodding in agreement and that I'm
not lost in some paradigm
sinkhole. Like, I I I'm sure you're sensing
my frustration. It's everywhere right now.
Everywhere. And this stuff is right in your
face. Please help me reach the people that
need to see it. Now, of course, is
through the veins of radical democrat party. I
mean, this is a radical,
radical group of people. I never thought I'd
see that either. So every democrat, everywhere, radical
extremist.
So now they're just terrorists. Is that what
you're saying? You mean, it's one step removed
from calling them terrorists. You're calling them radical
extremists.
I mean, isn't that just a bit a
bit
hyperbolic? I mean, a bit like it's just
it's it's it's it's crazy to me. Like,
if you're gonna call the left then they're
all terrorists, which by the way is not
that far removed. We're talking about people that
are supporting genocide, all of them. We're talking
about people that have invaded countries, murdered children,
raped and pillaged and robbed and told you
they're doing good things for freedom. They're all
terrorists. But the point for him to claim
that they're all radical extremists simply because they're
the other side,
you're dehumanizing.
You're, like, historically, your government dehumanizes the group
that they won't exploit. Do you not see
right now that they're dehumanizing the other side
of the paradigm? Which has always happened to
a degree, but it's getting ramped up. This
is why I think right now this is
not because of internal US dynamics. This is
Israel stoking this problem for a very problematic
outcome that is not in the interest of
any paradigm or any American.
That's my opinion. But for crying out loud,
can we not recognize how alarming this is?
So if you're saying that they're extremist, does
what does that mean? Can you arrest them?
Are you gonna tell them can you bomb
them? Like, if they I I know that
may sound crazy to you, but look at
what's going on in the world.
This rhetoric leads to something.
They they have gone crazy. And, again, just
to be clear, and I shouldn't always have
to do this,
it's just as dangerous and alarming and problematic
as the left calling any Republican a Nazi.
It's the same exact game, and that's what
I'm always trying to show you. Because then
that drives people to think they can be,
well, that's a Nazi. That's a that's a
white supremacist. We can't allow them to exist.
We need to censor them. We need in
fact, we need to take violent action to
stop them, and it would be justified. Didn't
we see that? Isn't that happening?
This terrifies me because you're going to see
people that think that you're justified in taking
this kind of action. You could even argue
that might have been what happened to Donald
Trump with the shooter. I don't think that's
what ultimately makes sense, but it possible.
And it would be problematic, and it's the
same thing he's doing here.
And instead of
this hatred,
Kamala Harris is pandering to it. He wouldn't
even meet. BB wouldn't talk to him, didn't
wanna talk to him, didn't wanna mention when
they finally were forced to meet. She wouldn't
be there. She wouldn't be in congress, and
they were Yeah. Kamala's ridiculous. Nobody should support
somebody like Kamala Harris or frankly anybody in
congress, but that's a hard sell for a
lot of Americans.
The point though
is that she refused to meet with a
leader of a genocide.
Like, think about the the effort. I mean,
obviously, he's speaking to a bunch of Zionist
Israelis. The bottom line though from an American
perspective, which maybe you didn't think this would
be seen by except it's on Fox, is
that ultimately, you're talking about a guy committing
genocide that the world can see. No matter
what political narrative they're spinning, it's gone. It's
out there. The world is never coming back
from seeing Israel for what they are right
now. That's clear. Now they may try to
spin some kind of political game over the
process of the next decade to get you
to think that they've changed, but they are
exposed.
The government, the Zionist organization. Not every Israeli,
not every Jew.
Right? So my point is
this, were forced to meet. She would Ultimately,
her not meeting with a genocidal leader,
how can you possibly criticize somebody for that?
The only way is to pretend like she's
the radical and they're the good guys and
forget everything you can see. Don't trust your
lying eyes.
Again, they're all crazy. They're all bad. Trump
and her included.
But it's interesting to see that all of
this hinges around whether or not you blindly
support the genocide,
which they all do. And they're all fighting
and competing
over who's more supportive of it, behind the
scenes anyway.
That's very interesting to me. So it's almost
like you're being driven to go, but look,
she shouldn't be with them anyway, and then
you could call the lefty. It's a it's
all some kind of game they're playing.
But bottom line, it boils down to Donald
Trump supporting a genocide. Supporting a genocidal maniac.
And then attacking people for not supporting that
genocidal maniac. Wouldn't be there. She wouldn't be
in congress, and they were forced to meet.
It was like she couldn't even she couldn't
stay. She just wanted to get out of
the room. You can't have that. She'll let
it go. She'll let Israel go. You can't
have that?
You're not allowed to not show up to
see Israel? Apparently so.
We're here tonight because we believe that this
vicious outbreak of militant and anti semitism, very
militant,
must be given no quarter, no safe harbor,
no place in a
civilized society.
Okay. So your free speech is no longer
there?
Like, let's not mince words. Okay? Antisemitism
is free speech. But that's not even what
they're talking about. They're talking about pro Palestinian
support.
But let's just even say you're out there
screaming racist remarks. That's protected under the first
amendment.
He knows that. He doesn't care, ladies and
gentlemen. That's the point. Like with the second
amendment, take the guns first, deal due process
later, as long as it works for him.
I just don't see how people can't recognize,
like all the rest of them, by the
way, he's no different. He's playing you. But
at the end of the day,
right in this one point, he is telling
you that antisemitism
cannot be a lie. We cannot live in
this world with that.
And you know how that's being weaponized. And
on top of that, even if it was
genuine antisemitism, that is protected speech.
This game of hate speech, isn't that what
the right is always calling out? Look at
them using hate speech to shut down our
words, but, oh, blah blah blah, we're not
gonna listen when he says it about Israel.
Don't be children. Be honest to yourselves. Recognize
what he's doing and fight for what you
believe in.
We must reject it in our schools, reject
it in our foreign policy, reject it in
our immigration system, and reject it at the
ballot box this November, you know.
So rejected in our immigration.
I mean, what so was that just another
I mean, what does it even mean? So
now you're gonna if peep you're
picking out the anti semitic immigrants and saying
you're not allowed in, but the whole point
is you're not I mean, it's just a
it I feel like he just says things
without even thinking about what they mean. Or,
yeah, the last thing he says
that box this November, you know? The ballot
box this November, like, just the point being
that a vote for him is against
or for fighting anti semitism, I guess. Jewish
people.
There's this last part coming up. Well, people
have to,
not vote by habit. You vote by habit
for democrats, and,
the democrats are really against you now if
you look at what they're doing. They're at
Oh, so democrats are against Jewish people now.
Like, it's just so silly what a weird
inversion that is of what it's it's just
it's just so strange to me how things
gone on a dime can change, like, Kamala's
suddenly some kind of political hero even though
nobody thinks that. It's all it's the testament
to propaganda.
Right? I mean, to frame it this way
is exactly what we're talking about. They're turning
in a criticism against Israel to hatred of
Jews. They're gonna do that to you, Republicans,
if you're listening and care about where this
goes and don't just blindly fight for a
political side.
Absolutely against you. You have to you have
to stop. You have to be smart. People
can't believe
that. I mean
So right there, the point was he ends
with people that's what I was gonna say
earlier. People can't believe that and and he
just stops and goes,
a new point.
I just I honestly believe he sets himself
up with, like, the hyperbole.
People can't believe.
Oh, what was that thing? Oh, the thing
I did here. Let's that's but better than
anyone ever, anytime, all together. Never it's just
like this it's just one big hyperbolic statement.
It's it's hilarious to me. But it works
for him apparently.
But here is another other aspect of this
clip that I think is even more so
the one that really stood out to me
is the idea that they he admitted publicly
that a that the lobbying group of Israel,
which more than one group, but, you know,
the the main APAC group,
would have stopped them from being elected had
they had the power that he thinks they
should. Him he is on the radio saying
that they should have that power. You have
him telling him you're, you know, you're gonna
have the president.
Oh, can you listen to this next one?
Kamala Harris will support unlimited
migration from terrorist hot beds into the United
States when I'm president?
I'm I'm she probably will. But I wanna
be clear that I think that that is
a bipartisan game. They just play it differently
because we just described how that works. And
you know republicans are all about the fiscal
aspect of this. Clearly, making sure that we
can continue
exploiting all these countries. Right? That's classic. But
the idea that they're gonna continue to drive
in that where he goes with this, I
find an interesting overlap to Gaza.
United States. When I'm president,
we will deport the foreign Jihad
sympathizers, and we will deport them very quickly
in Hamak. Okay. So you're gonna be deported
if you have a political opinion that he
doesn't agree with.
That's what he said. Now I know you're
super hyped up and emotional about the idea
of jihad and whatever they're calling whatever's going
on. The point is that
as he says support.
That we will deport the foreign jihad
sympathizers and we Sympathizers.
Sympath not support, but sympathizers. So you look
over and you see somebody carrying out an
attack. Lester Stevens say they're ISIS member and
you go, you know, I I sympathize with
that guy.
Don't you have a right to do that?
Yeah. I I can say you're supporting terrorism,
but you have a right to do that.
That is called free speech. That is called
having your own beliefs,
whether religious or otherwise. Those are all protected
under the constitution.
He is straight up telling you in another
way,
we will deport you if you have it
and you know who he's talking about. He's
talking about the people supporting Palestine.
There are Republicans out there that support Palestine,
many of which probably support Trump.
Recognize how problematic this is. He is being
played like a fiddle by his funding, by
the Israeli entity.
They all are for that matter, but he
is clearly the selection in my opinion. And
look at this stuff being laid out for
you. I'm gonna violate your constitutional rights just
the way Israel wants me to. Pick me
today.
We will deport them very quickly and Hamas
supporters
will Hamas supporters. Okay. So now we went
even further. Because Hamas, first of all, is
a group that's funded by Israel, which we
don't wanna talk about.
But they're a group that is politically supported,
who is openly fighting for the legal resistance
of the Palestinian people, whatever crimes they're committing,
it's easy to prove.
So supporting the resistance against Israel is now
you could get deported for it.
I mean, there's just something especially wrong with
this, guys. It's mind blowing. Will be gone.
If you hate America
Oh, and and and the good point, I
am in the chat, points this out. And
I say the same thing about whether it's
intifada or whatever. These words have simple meanings.
It's just because you've been propagandized to see
them as terrorism.
Jihad means struggle.
Intifada means I think it's resistance. Or intifada
is rebellion or res I forget. The point
is simply that it means a benign concept
that you could call, like I've said many
many times, if you want, you can call
it the American intifada
or revolution.
It's the same concept.
And in many cases, it means struggle.
Right? Like pushing back against it. Like he's
saying for Jihad. It means about pushing back
against oppression. And yes, that can overlap with
violence. Just like the American revolution did. But
it's funny how we rationalize the ones we
like.
You know, that that's always how this goes.
What he's saying is you're not allowed to
have this opinion in the free country pretend
we have.
If you want to eliminate Israel,
then we don't want you in our country.
We really Oh, look at that. I know
there's a lot of Republicans out there that
are arguing that Israel is a problem.
Maybe not the majority. I hope it is.
But so now, if you want this illegal
state to be gone, which, again, most logical
people are calling for a 2 state solution
even though that doesn't seem even remotely likely
with what's going on with Israel and people
like Trump. But the bottom line is that
it's an illegal entity. It is occupying this
country. There's the this stuff has come out
left and right since this ongoing genocide.
So you're now saying if you agree with
the legalities, which means they shouldn't be there,
then we don't want you in this country.
Yep. Now who controls this country again? Who's
influencing these kind of things? Who do you
think?
Again, it's this this game of playing, like,
I got in that weird back and forth
with CJ Hopkins about this where he called
me a white supremacist for saying we're occupied.
Just because there's a classic game that's played
using Zog overlapping with racist concepts, probably because
they're overlapping them so he makes that response,
does not mean that I'm arguing for white
supremacist concepts.
I'm arguing that a political entity is controlling
the policy. Didn't we just effing prove that?
Like, can't an honest person see that? I
just think he's blinded due to these beliefs
or so afraid to be seen as racist.
It's just generational, guys. The bottom line is
that we can see what they are. I'm
not talking about Jews. Again, a point I
make every time, you can see major organizations
of Jewish people who are marching alongside
at at the protest, for example, were mostly
put on by Jewish organizations.
We didn't find that out until after the
fact
as they went through some congressional push to
call it all racism.
He is part of that right now.
And he's telling you, you're not allowed to
support this. You're not allowed to fight against
that illegal state. You're not allowed I mean,
look. Even if you think it's all even
if you think it's based in racism,
I'm allowed to think whatever I want, Donald
Trump. I can think Israel shouldn't exist. That's
what we're supposed to pretend this country is
about. Freedom of thought, but nope. He's telling
you otherwise.
Make sure you hear this. We don't want
you in our country.
I will ban refugee settlements from terror infested
areas
like the Gaza
Strip. What does that mean?
So let's make sure you hear this.
I will ban
refugee settlements.
He's not talking about illegal settlers.
They're not refugees.
That's a very carefully selected statement in my
opinion. You know what he's talking about?
Palestinians.
Now you I mean, you we'll wait we'll
wait and see what happens. I'm not gonna
say I know for a matter of fact
that that's that's my opinion
Because he's just making a statement and Trump
is notorious for saying things exactly the way
that you spoke to hear them, but doesn't
mean them or saying things that sound confusing
when he means something else. It's just what
he does.
But think about this.
I will ban refugee settlements from terror infested
areas like the Gaza Strip. Now also, we
need to know that Miriam Adelson
already gave him a $100,000,000,000
so he would allow West Bank settlements. That's
what not West Bank, but they're talking about
settlements in general. They're all illegal.
Mark my words. He just set out in
words that he will ban refugee settlements from
Gaza because terrorism. You know, the terrorist that
funded Israel funds.
But that means all the Palestinians that are
currently in these refugee tent cities because they've
been displaced, well, he's gonna say they're not
allowed to be there.
I'm telling you, that's what he means.
Now I I could be wrong. I hope
I'm wrong. But my god is that that's
that's
I mean, there's not there's not a word
that that's worse than terrorism.
You are displacing and bombing and murdering and
starving, and these people are watching their children
die in front of them, and you're gonna
come in and go, you're not allowed to
be there. You're you're illegally that's what Israel
has done everywhere.
Push them and then come out 10 years
later and say, guess what? You don't have
a permit. Get out of our land.
Over and over and over. They've got been
displaced 14 times each just since October 7th.
Here he is telling you, you're not we're
not gonna allow
refugee settlements.
That's the only and there's no way you
misunderstand that. Nobody thinks these settlers are refugees.
Nobody's talking about them like they're refugees. Who
is being talked about like the refugees?
The Palestinians.
Man,
I'm telling you, my gut is he knows
exactly what he just did and that really
grosses me out. And we will arrest the
pro Hamas thugs who vandalized federal property and
make really life very, very difficult in this
country for a lot of people.
Arrest the pro Hamas thugs who vandalized, many
of which have already been proven to have
been vandalized by Zionists who are pretending to
be them so that you get the same
kind of sentiments here. But even so, if
somebody breaks the law, yeah, they should be
arrested. But all you're doing is setting a
tone that if you have these thoughts, you're
already a problem, and that is what will
be seated into the conversation.
I will put every single college president on
notice that we just lost another one today
from
I mean, god. I mean, I'm the first
that will call out the the liberal leaning
woke mindset of a lot of these people,
if not all.
But the idea that this it's not even
that that he is pressuring people in these
positions
to like, it's again, he's just talking about
Hamas and Israel
and the idea that they somehow were supporting
these when all they ever really did was
support these people's right to protest Israel. And
that got bastardized by the ridiculous cartoons like
Stefanik
screaming falsehood that got later proven to be
false by people like the police who were
representing the reality that, no, that never happened.
Even though she went on to lie about
it still, they're all being paid by APAC,
guys. There's no way around the influence there.
Bottom line is this is unconstitutional.
Columbia,
how weak, how pathetic are these people? How
weak are they?
I mean, the true weakness is coming from
people that are blindly fighting for a genocide
because you get a benefit from it. I
clearly don't support the politics of most these
people, if not all. But the weakness
is not supporting the it's it's leaning with
the easy financial thing as opposed to standing
up for the right hard and difficult thing
to support, which is fighting against the genocide
knowing that they will come after you. That
is the tough thing to do. That's what
actual leaders do. You're a coward. Can you
imagine these people running these colleges and they
they're afraid to say anything
even slightly negative to these groups that want
death. I completely agree with that. Not the
want death is a whole game to play
with everything else, but they gave about the
woke ideology.
100%.
And I I you I mean, you could
clearly argue that they played a part in
that or plenty of them just ended up
in this dynamic and were I mean, the
fact that they're afraid to say anything, to
get canceled at their own school, doesn't seem
to suggest that they're doing it. But either
way, my point is the ideology is there.
And a lot of them leaned into it
because they thought it would help them or
they thought they believed it. But if you
believe that that's some kind of left versus
right game, guys, that is the whole point.
The woke ideology is a manipulation played against
the paradigm.
I mean, guys, if we can't see how
these things, these binary games work, you and,
again, the people that don't wanna see it
will never see it. They don't want to
pull away from their team sport politics that
they think they're winning in this moment.
And it only at times when it starts
to feel like they're losing, do they open
their mind to something else? But it's constant.
The woke mindset is a government manipulation.
It is and if any many ways you
could find republican ties to this because ultimately
it is not a left or right dynamic.
It is about creating division. It is about
hurting. And there are always people that lean
into it for a political side.
But it's the same game here.
They're all going to abuse your censorship. They're
all going to abuse your suppression for their
benefit.
All of them. The American taxpayer will not
subsidize the creation of terrorist sympathizers
on American soil. It won't happen. College Alright.
So you're not gonna allow you're not gonna
be allowed to get college loans if you
have anti Israel perspectives. You know, sorta like
in Texas, they wouldn't give you relief
that your tax dollars paid for during a
hurricane unless you signed a document saying you
would not boycott Israel.
That's the same thing.
How do we not see how insidious this
is? Will end
the anti semitic propaganda or they will lose
their accreditation
and every single last penny of Wow. Wow.
So even at a college where you're supposed
to be opening your mind to different perspectives.
Nope. Not if it's anti Israel. Who do
you think's funding that? Who do you think's
driving that
interest? Do you think Trump just wrote this
down in his desk one day? Come on,
guys. And I'll I'll make a point about
this in a in a coming up in
a minute. You know, like somebody in the
chat says, it's the woke the woke left
is the woke right. It's the same thing.
Oh, it's actually not what he's saying. It's
the wake right. But I think the same
thing. The woke right is just as bad
as the woke left. It's just different flavors
and they're doing the same things. And it's
hard for them to see each other in
each other because they're doing it from a
different way. Like, with the lives of TikTok
aspect of canceling people with these these
businesses because they dared to make a bad
joke about Trump.
Right? Or and then completely defending or or
or what was it? The,
oh, it was a person in the UK
who was posting things saying I we should
burn all these people alive in these buildings.
And then and and again, it's all speech,
so I would also take a stance that
these are just again, it's extreme for some
people. Whole fire theater thing, you know, all
however you wanna play it. I don't think
words are violence. I think that the actions
taken around them, that's the responsibility of the
actor.
But the point was, they all defended that.
The, you know, the the leader republican paradigm.
Again, I'm always talking about that as opposed
to conservatives and liberals. The point
is that you're willing to support the canceling
of somebody because they make a joke, which
was, I wish you was a better shot.
That's what they tweeted. Or rather, I think
it was Facebook. Whereas this person is posting
something to make a point and saying, they
won't take me down and says I'll burn
them alive and it gets taken down They
go, oh, censorship.
How do we not see how willfully blind
that is?
We shouldn't support censorship anywhere or canceling anywhere.
But the woke left is just bad as
the woke right.
You'll see how nice they'll be.
You'll see though they'll be some They'll change
their ways very quickly, but it's not probably
from the heart. That's the problem. They may
change their ways, but not from the heart.
You see, you know how weird this is?
I mean, this is just a clumsy way
of doing what they all do, which is
that even when they come out later and
say, okay, I'm gonna change,
you shouldn't listen to them
because they don't mean it.
Probably not. But it's just it's all you're
doing is you're how do we not see
the division involved in all this? Shouldn't we
at least hope that they're changing and lean
into the positive? No. Screw them.
Never. Because they're not you and you're not
us. We're always divided. It's constant ongoing forever
division.
They're the bad guy. The the the point
is shouldn't isn't the whole game about working
with the you know, crossing the aisle and
the whole game? Like, it's just so funny
how that it's like the the media used
to pretend that they were balanced and not
leaning one side or the other. What a
game that was. And now they're just like,
we're left and we're right. That's the same
thing. Right? They they are the design of
the way the left right paradigm works is
they make sure that it never changes.
So So that's how this works. The left
never works to right, right doesn't work to
the left. They guarantee that we stay stuck
in that mud, and that's everybody in that
mud is wildly profiting at your expense.
They're changing it because that's brutal,
but they're not gonna change it from the
heart, I suspect.
As your president, I will once again stand
with the state of Israel. I will protect
American Jewish community. I will put America first.
I will keep America's But notice how he
said stand with Israel first.
Safe,
and I will defend Judeo Christian civilization from
the barbarian savages and the left wing extremists.
Are you serious?
You will save Judeo Christian
civilization from the barbarians?
I mean, come on, guys. I mean, we
cannot take this seriously.
Do you realize that any representation of what
you might see as a barbarian
are all the people that they fund?
All of the most wild extremists out there
that they have funded into reality, like the
moderate rebels, like the people like Hamas, for
example, before they became whatever had changed over
the last 20 years. I'm not arguing good.
I'm just saying that you can prove that
the organization changed as people grew up after
they were murdered or their families were killed.
Their actually, their families were murdered. Their families
were killed and they decided to try to
change something. And over the last decades, the
the group has changed more towards resistance. I
think it's very clear. But I still think
Israel influences that. That's why I don't support
them. But the bottom line is
you can clearly prove that these people,
Israel, the United States, have funded the most
radical elements of everything they claim they're fighting,
in particular,
the very entity of ISIS and Al Qaeda.
And he turns around and says, we're gonna
fight the barbarian. You know who he's talking
about? The other entities that are not them.
The entities that they claim are the ones
supporting them, like Iran.
Even though they're not really barbarians, are they?
You're just being disgustingly racist. You're trying to
make it about the Muslim hordes in their
caves versus the civilization.
This is
the destruction of society. You think that those
people in these streets are just, oh, this
what he's doing is the destruction of society.
You are be you are being baited into
what you just heard those rabbis talking about.
Literally falling into this trap.
I mean, it's just so incredible to me
how obvious this all is. And I'm not
saying I can the the exact there's a
lot of v vi,
vying agendas.
But the fact that this is not in
your interest is what I'm talking about.
But I just I I want to believe
enough of you out there are also conservative
or liberal or anything else seeing that this
is dangerous.
My point from before is you need to
stand up and call out these talking heads
on the left or on the right, whatever
side you're on. Right now, the Alex and
Tuckers and all the rest of them out
there that are blindly walking you into this,
you need to call them out.
Who want to destroy it?
Together, we will confront the forces of anti
semitism,
and we will win win win.
Thank you. God bless you, and God bless
America.
Save Israel. Right? Save Israel.
Oh, the last thing he says is save
Israel.
There's
Miriam Adelson.
I just I'm blown away
by everything he said on I mean, the
the the
congress.
I mean, it's just it's exactly I mean,
it's almost as if he floated every trope
that we're supposed to pretend isn't real. And
if you point it out, you're racist. But
he literally says these
things. And it's, again, it's not I'm not
talking about Jewish people here. I'm talking about
Zionists and Israeli government or Zionists other place
in the world, Christian or Jew or whatever
else, who are actively manipulating you for their
benefit.
And Trump is just
a puppet in all this, if not an
active part.
Now here, a couple points I wanted to
add to this. When they're talking about the
idea of the jihadist,
you know, all the things they're talking about.
We're gonna fight against the jihadist.
Okay. Well, let's reiterate the point. Here's the
former head of Shin Bet speaking with Hassan,
reiterating what we've seen him play on that
clip. That Netanyahu guaranteed Hamas would be in
power because he needed to use them.
Just like, guess what? They Israel needs to
keep the left right paradigm divided to make
sure they can control us. Make sure you
think about that as his clip is playing.
Pre October 7th,
do you believe Netanyahu
was deliberately propping up Hamas in Gaza as
a way of dividing Palestinians
and preventing a 2 state solution?
Well, his policy, and, he didn't hide it.
He's totally against,
reality in which, there is a Palestinian state
alongside Israel.
He said it.
His policy,
the way he explained it,
is divide and control to make sure that
Palestinians will not have a unified government.
And the only way to do it is
was
to
to do everything in order to maintain Hamas
in power,
even,
if,
it was necessary,
to approve sending,
more than
probably $1,500,000,000
from, from Qatar.
And,
every time when,
the security leaders,
military and the came to him and told
him, look.
Hamas,
will not control his violence.
And the moment that he believes that,
he can he can
launch a war or a battle, he will
do it. Yes.
So he did not approve it. So, it's
not a secret. Yes. This was
his former policy. He did everything in order
to increase the power of Hamas and to
make sure that,
Abu Mazen
and, the Palestinian authority.
So will not be able to, to create
a unified government.
So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
and systematically
even even told this on record, whoever
wants to avoid
the threat
of a 2 state solution
has to support my policy of paying protection
money to the Hamas. So what we did,
we
And that's him that you just saw on
the other video, former head of Shin Bet.
Very, very clear. So my point is as
he talks about fight, stopping the the fine
you know, whatever they're talking about, the jihad
and funders of terrorism.
You mean them?
Right. Because it's easy to prove. And it's
also, on top of that, what the US
government has done all around the world. As
Kenneth Roth says, we often forget Israel helped
to create Hamas to weaken the PLO. And
Netanyahu I mean, quite frankly, I would go
as far as to say they created Hamas.
Doesn't mean that there wasn't an entity that
was existing before they turned them into what
they were, but they took this and turned
it into their tool. That's the real point.
And Netanyahu supported Hamas until October 7th.
It's easy to prove, allowing massive Qatari payments
to it as a way to weaken the
Palestinian Authority and avoid pressure for Palestinian state.
It's objectively obvious. And the point is that
we talked about the tunnels and the Egyptian
overlap. Guys, they were working this system. They
were allowing things to smuggle back and forth.
I've proven this from whether it's the National
Geographic article or the easy dynamic that shows
that they could see where they're doing this.
And Israel, as the as the National Geographic
article wrote, they they would pop off an
a rocket here and there, which we would
use to keep the system in place, which
means the continued
blockade, which then they could all profit from,
which they allowed that. And most of the
stuff they brought back and forth was food
and toys for children. And, yes, weapons too.
But they did this to maintain the system.
We're being lied to.
Now, here's the Heretz article. Even Heretz broke
this down and and this is a few
days after October 7th.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of
Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and
transferring money to Hamas. He said this is
part of their strategy.
Here's the Mossad chief in
2020
visiting Qatar,
urging them to continue Hamas financial aid. This
is harratz.
But, you know, we're all crazy apparently.
Oops. Wrong one. Let me save this for
you.
I've shown you so many times and it's
just amazing how people still pretend that's not
the reality.
Now Censored Man points out some other stuff
about this Trump back and forth. He says,
Trump says he's disappointed that the Israel and
Jewish lobby isn't as powerful now as it
was 15 years ago. As we just played
you multiple clips of him saying that, it's
not a joke. He says 15 years ago,
if you said anything bad about Israel or
the Jewish people, you were finished as a
politician.
But most powerful lobby in the country by
far was Israel and Jewish people. Today, it's
almost like what happened.
Schumer is like a Palestinian. He does it
again. He uses Palestinian as a derogatory
term.
I mean, guys,
it's incredible. This guy doesn't care.
Derogatory. Who would believe this as
Hamas wages a savage war in the south
as blood menaces the north and the Houthi
terrorists
attack at sea.
In Europe, the streets of Paris, London, and
Brussels are overrun by mobs of Hamas.
So just so it's clear, because he can't
hear it that well, he talked he said
overrun by Muslims, talking about the UK and
in Europe, and says overrun by Hamas.
That's just lazy, guys. He just the point
is he's just delivering narrative to people who
wanna hear what they're being paid for or
what they're paying for. How they're all Hamas
now?
Sure. Why not? Borders changing their jihad slogans
in the heart of the western
capital. And in America, the evil
antisemitism
is rampaging all throughout our cities, the Democrat
Party Wow. Wing media institutions.
Like, you mean you mean the Democrat Party
left wing institutions that have been aggressively pro
Israel and still are?
It's just it's a fantasy.
Now, yes, they've tapered this back a bit
because I think if left and right, they
see that they're losing.
They see that it's it's opportunism. They can't
keep calling they keep lying as Israel falls
in the background.
But it's obvious that they all blindly support
Israel. All of them. RFK, Donald Trump, Biden,
Kamala, all of them. They all get money
from APAC. So this game that they're playing
is only that, a game to keep you
thinking 1 versus the other on weirdly, like
I keep showing you, all driving in the
direction of Trump's success. A day for the
president of the United States, which is hard
to believe in our colleges and universities. They're
going local. They're good.
Love that. Something's wrong with me. They said
this. I never thought this could happen. You
know, I just need to get off for
a second. Years ago, my father was a
big supporter of Jewish people and Israel is
not Jewish. He wasn't Jewish, but he was
a great,
dedicated a lot of Jewish people.
And
if you say, let's say, 15 years ago,
maybe not even that long,
anything bad about Israel or Jewish people, you
will finish as a politician.
Right?
And point at Miriam. Right? Right? Right? You
used to control everything. Right?
You and I know you. Right? This is
so funny the way just right in the
open. As you would do that, congressman.
You wouldn't you wouldn't do it anyway, but
nobody would do it. The most powerful lobby
in in this country by far Yep. Was
Israel and Jewish people. That's the second time
he's mentioned in this speech. Today, it's almost
like, what happened?
What happened? What happened to Schumer? What happened
to all these people? Schumer is like a
a Palestinian.
Right? Same old shtick. He knew that would
get a laugh because it's disgusting and these
people hate Palestinians.
I mean, just it's just how do we
not see that these people are leaning into
the worst people in the world?
Like, I I mean, it doesn't matter what
you think is the worst or what you
bottom line is, can we not just objectively
see that clapping about that is just gross?
Again, if it's if you don't think so,
then you're blinded by the idea that you've
convinced yourself that all Palestinians are one thing.
And that in and of itself is a
racist sentiment.
Racism exists. It's not some left wing concept.
People who hate people based on who they
are as a race, whatever they are as
a person, that's racism. It's the same thing
we've talked about in reverse when it comes
to hiring KJP as opposed to the best
person for the job. That's also racism. The
point is you're able to see it in
one direction
just like the left can only see it
in one hey. There you go. It's the
same old stupid game we're stuck in. And
I genuinely believe that most people can see
through it right now.
We need to collectively call out these pretenders
acting like they're leading the charge right now.
It's shocking because I grew up where,
is you know, mostly just this is where
my father was a builder in Brooklyn.
I guess, hang on. I'm having trouble. I
can't even hear that very well. So the
point's the same.
Acknowledges that Jewish Zionist control elections, but sees
it as a positive thing.
We I played you 3, 4, 4 clips
now of him saying that.
There's one.
He talks about Israel being, which oh, no.
This was the one about the congressional medal.
Just a weird statement. I'll let you listen
to it. I have to say, Miriam,
I watched Sheldon sitting so proud in the
White House when we gave
Miriam the presidential
medal of freedom. That's the highest award you
can get as a civilian. It's the equivalent
of the congressional
medal of honor. Why? Civilian version. It's actually
much better because
everyone gets the Congressional Medal of Honor. That
soldiers,
they're either in very bad shape because they've
been hit so many times by bullets or
they're dead.
She gets it, and she's a healthy, beautiful
woman. It's right.
And they're rated equal.
Oh, wait. So this Israeli
citizen who is not in the military got
a bet the better thing. It's just a
weird statement. And she says, did this man
really just say that the medal he gave
Miriam Adelson was much better than the congressional
medal of honor because the soldiers who get
them are either shot up or dead and
hers, she's healthy? It's a weird statement. It
really is. Like, it's just this I I
honestly chalk it up to just Kim rambling.
He traps himself with things he says all
the time.
This one, I think, is more important.
Donald Trump says Israel looks very small on
a map compared to other countries because he
wonders if there's a way to make it
bigger.
He I I honestly think a lot of
times he does know what he's saying. Right?
It's a mixed bag. I think he rambles
a lot and he traps himself, but it's
sometimes he he the he's good about saying
things that either can be mistaken as something
else or right down the middle.
In this case,
what does it mean to make it a
little bit bigger? I think you know what
that means.
We must stand with our friend and partner,
the state of Israel. We will. We will.
Strongly.
And you'll be okay if you have the
right president. You have the wrong president like
her.
Honestly, you don't have a chance. When you
look at the odds when you look at
the map, a map of the Middle East
I should love the substance of everything he
says. It's just so funny. Just it's just
there's never any substance. It's always just platitudes
and statements and, you know, same thing.
Israel is a
tiny little spot
compared to these giant landmasses. It's really a
tiny spot. I actually said, is there any
way of getting more? It's so tiny? Is
there any way to get more? You know?
Yeah. Yeah. There is. It's called the Greater
Israel Project, and he knows exactly what he's
talking about. And they're all going, yes. Yes.
Exactly. That's what we need from Donald Trump.
We need him to give us the illegal
settlements that we're paying him for.
That's politics for you. Like, we paid him
for Golan Heights and Jerusalem capital and all
the other illegal things we stole from Syria
and from Palestine.
It's not it's not up for debate. It's
a provable statement from international law.
Censored man highlights this saying, people need to
realize that APAC is literally just the tip
of the iceberg when it comes to Israel
interference in US elections.
Miriam Adelson, who speaks with an Israeli accent
because she was literally born in Tel Aviv,
donated a $100,000,000,000 to Trump's campaign in order
to influence him to make favorable decisions regarding
Israel. Guys, that's not even secret on the
record. AIPAC is just one lobbying group that
funds US politicians to ensure they make favorable
policy decisions for Israel.
However, there's a plethora of other Jewish billionaires
and pro Israel groups that have also fund
political campaigns to guarantee that support for Israel
remains bipartisan,
which it it is. So what's the I
thought we were just talking about how democrats
were all extremist terrorist, but we'll fund them
everywhere though. Yeah. That makes sense, doesn't it?
Here's what she had to say.
She said he made a promise
to recognize Jerusalem. And to move the embassy
to Jerusalem.
Both of both of which were the who
did not have the authority to do. That
are illegal.
I mean, any objective international the point is
people that say otherwise are pro Israel.
There are people out there that are anti
as well as just objectively in the middle
that will tell you that's not accurate. Same
as Golan Heights. They were crimes.
Mean, guys, I shouldn't have even debate these
things. The law is very simple.
He did not have the authority to do
that. Israel doesn't care and neither did he.
They just said it out loud and took
it. It's the same thing. And he's she's
praising him for these illegal
acts. He promised he would go for Iran
nuclear deal. Right. He did not. Yeah. He
he pulled them out of the Iran nuclear
deal, which all that did was
show that they were breaking their agreement and
gave Iran the ability to do what they
did, which they turned around and called terrorism.
It was literally written down in the deal
that they could do exactly what they did
if is if US pulled out. Because they
had they had a worry that the US
would, and they did. Surprise, surprise.
So, again, lie on top of lie. And
what he's paid.
Right. But what you need to hear is
the promise.
Right? Not that he decided based on American
policy or what's best for Americans, which is
the way they presented at the time. No.
No. No. He was paid.
They may ask him to pray. He promised
Sheldon Adelson that he would give them Jerusalem,
that he would give them illegally to Golan
Heights, that he would pull them out of
a deal that was committed to
before he was elected. Then he got elected,
and guess what? He kept his promises to
Israel. How many promises did he keep to
you, America? Did he lock her up? Did
he end the fed? Did he give you
the Jay of Camphor? No. None of those
things happened, but she sure as hell kept
his illegal promises to Israel.
I wonder what he's gonna do this time.
Peace
between
Israel and Arab nations. Yeah. He did. To
all these camps. No. No. He really did
at all, in fact. What he did was
illegally, surreptitiously
remove people from and put puppets in place
that were more amenable to Israel. Their peoples
did not want that. Most of them have
now gone back the other way. Saudi Arabia
never actually happened, which is kinda like the
part that screwed up the whole thing. The
Abraham Accords were a manipulation.
The point I always make is about the
Sudan.
You can't keep telling people that this was
about
positive change when all you did was call
them terrorists and then say, well, if you
join us with Israel, we'll just stop calling
you terrorists. There's only one way to look
at that, or 2 ways. Either they were
never terrorists and they said they were to
push them to be is friends with Israel,
or they were like, we don't care if
you're terrorists as long as you're friends with
Israel. They didn't change the point.
It's obvious.
Now we see all these things rolling back.
Egypt was an obvious example where they pulled
a coup, they put someone in power. Where's
my favorite dictator? He famously said to Sisi.
The people of Egypt hate Israel.
All they got out of Trump was the
promise to do what everybody
that what only Israel wanted. Not Egypt, not
anybody else, what Israel wanted. Promise kept.
And
all in Golan Heights, and that was a
big lift.
He promised Golan Heights.
Yeah. And he illegally gave it to Israel,
which they've taken and bombed into Syria ever
since and stolen from Syria ever since and
continued to do I mean, this it's all
I they turned it into Trump Heights. At
least one of those locations was called Trump
Heights.
It's been re I mean, this this got
brought back up around the Druze bombing. It
was at Ma,
Ma, I forgot the name of the city
now. The the Druze location is Syria in
the Golan Heights.
The that Israel,
you're accidentally or deliberately bombed, they blamed on
Lebanon.
And they were like, they killed Israelis. No.
No. They're still Syrian Druze. They don't believe
they're part of Israel despite what you yell
at them. And they showed up and they
kicked them out of the area. So they
don't want to be part of it. It's
obvious what they did was against everybody's wishes
other than Israel. Promise kept. And he recognized
it.
And all of this,
he did in his first term
while battling
COVID pandemic,
race riots,
and the liberal media.
It's so funny how they the Israeli side
of this plays so hard into the 2
party paradigm.
Yet, they they laugh at all of you
when they sit at their couches and talk
about how they control the United States, where
you'll find many videos like that. 2 of
which are leaked from Netanyahu, not from him
but of him, where he'll tell you that.
They laugh at how easy it is to
manipulate you with your 2 party paradigm. Oh,
let me tell you. What is
Oh, okay. Politician
make promises.
Real leaders keep it down.
But apparently not to the American people. Real
leaders do what Israel wants. Yay.
Why
president Trump deserves
the full support
of the entire
Jewish people?
I mean, why does Miriam Alson speak for
the Jewish people?
She's an Israeli, that doesn't give her any
right to the Jewish people despite what they
love to claim, that Zionist claim, this is
all If you're not a Zionist, you're not
a Jew. There's a massively growing position grouping
of Jewish people, a different groups of Jewish
people around the world who are calling out
Zionism.
I know it's a constant pushback on that.
I'm telling you it's a rapidly growing amount
of people that are screaming about what they
can now see, what they've now changed. I
mean, I'll I'm gonna go over tomorrow. I
have a whole section on.
So her standing up and saying that is
just trying to convince people, one, that they
all represent Jewish people as Zionists as well
as trying to convince Jews out there listening
that they're supposed to feel this way. Just
not true.
About Israel's security and prosperity.
This must be our pledge to him.
This must be our promise to him. The
the White House will be his again.
Oh,
isn't that interesting? They're they're they're gonna pledge
and promise to him that we'll give him
the White House as long as he does
what we want is what I mean, that's
basically what she just laid out. He'll do
this for us. We'll give him the White
House.
Little tit for tat.
Quid pro quo.
America
needs it.
The entire
world
needs it.
As Herzl said,
if
you believe,
it is no dream. Ah, yeah. Theodore Herzl,
the famously extremist
founder of Zionism.
If you will, it is no dream. Just
rape a few people and burn down villages,
and it's all yours.
Let's support that guy. And he commits
to that dream. All of us,
right here, right now,
president Trump, the flow is always And
then he gets up and says all things
that we already showed you.
Right. Just lays out all these all the
things we all do. We'll fight for Israel
against American interest. We'll fight against American constitutional
rights. We'll do whatever you want.
That's I mean, that's what we just heard.
Now, again, let's be very clear. It's not
a secret. Harrettes wrote this article. This is
from the 3rd June 2024.
Trump is desperate for Miriam Adelson's cash. Now,
again, this is not from some left wing
internal
US dynamic, guys. This is Israeli media highlighting
the reality
that Miriam Adelson
is important to Trump because he needs funding.
That's obvious.
Her condition,
which was obviously and publicly outlined, West Bank
annexation, which, by the way, is undeniably
illegal.
The US says that. International law says that.
The UN says that. Literally everybody says that.
The US included, mind you. But he goes,
yep. No problem. Because who cares?
That guy's agreed. They have agreed. They're moving
forward. He get a $100,000,000.
Now just to be clear,
these are the people we're talking about.
As Ryan Grim is highlighting,
Anthony See, who's an activist, who is working
to protect homes in the West Bank, not
Gaza, but the West Bank.
They sent this video, dropsite news, of an
American who just got shot by the IDF.
Yeah. So just to be clear, this is,
like, the 3rd example I've seen over the
last couple of weeks. Americans, not like it
should matter any more than the other human
being, but for the American audience, especially those
that wanna see this as, you know, the
Israel good versus everybody good, the there are
American activists
who I'm sure it'll probably make you be
able to ignore it if you pretend they're
somehow on the left side of the spectrum,
which makes you disgusting, but there are American
activists that are fighting for
against illegal annexation who just got shot by
the IDF.
So suddenly you're able to ignore that, then
you don't care about Americans, do you? You
only care about certain part Zionist Americans. The
bottom line is you should care as an
American
that a foreign government just shot an American
citizen for doing something, or rather protesting something
that we can prove is illegal.
Sort of like Rachel Kory in running over
with a bulldozer that we all saw on
video, and yet somehow nobody does anything about
it. Or Joe Meters who is a USS
Liberty veteran who gets kidnapped by Israel on
the flotilla and gets taken in prison
for months, and nobody nobody says a word
about it. Because the truth is your government
does anything that they're asking them to, especially
when it's or rather just even when it's
against your interests.
The full story is right here you can
read for yourself.
But this is I keep seeing this.
Or this example, as Robert just covered. Israel's
horrifying mass rape and torture campaign against Palestinians.
Now this is overlapping with the bestseller report,
but he does a really deep dive on
this and shows you what they're actually doing.
Direct quotes from people that are on the
ground. I mean, it's it's horrifying.
And here's the video of the Knesset literally
arguing whether it's okay to rape people, and
they're arguing yes.
Or the video where on the media itself,
the guy is going, they should have a
right to rape them because they're not Jew.
That it's open, guys. They are openly calling
for this stuff.
My point is these are the people both
in the West Bank or in Gaza who
all wanna settle in these areas, who are
actively doing the worst things in I mean,
on a planet right now.
And Trump is willing to fight for them.
I'm not.
Now here is the independent. Trump world scrambling
to clean up mess after
ex president's angry tweets to mega donor. Apparently,
this just happened.
Who knows the validity of it? Because the
media lies all the time. But the end
of the day, this is being circulated with
left and right media, which apparently Trump sent
a bunch of negative messages to Miriam Adelson.
It says he reported ins he reportedly instructed
his aide to send a string of angry
messages to
Adelson.
That includes having the his aide send text
to Adelson, the widow of Sheldon Adelson, the
8th 8th richest woman in the world occur
currently,
complaining that the super pack she funds,
which has poured 1,000,000 of dollars into supporting
Trump, 100,000,000 of of probably more, was being
run by RINOs,
Republicans in name only.
This is so important.
Now maybe this even shows you that Trump
doesn't see the bigger game. Maybe he is
just being played. It really wouldn't surprise me.
His hubris is easy to manipulate.
But my the point that I'm always try
highlighting is that this what this shows you
is that they're playing all sides.
It's about the bigger picture, which by the
way is exactly why Adelson or AIPAC or
the rest of them fund every person,
all sides. Even the ones Trump just got
gun calling Hamas supporting extremist radicals. But we'll
fund them though because that makes sense.
The point is they're working with these people
because it's not about left versus right, but
they need you to think that.
As long as their pockets are filled, they
don't care.
But it says the 2 in 2016,
the Adelsons gave more than $20,000,000
to Trump's campaign
and 5,000,000 to his inauguration. Trump gave Adelson
the presidential medal of freedom.
Think about weird that is. Because he gave
him money?
That's crazy. But in 2020, mind you, the
Adelsons contributed more than $90,000,000.
Ultimately, they threw that threw the pack, they
gave him a 105,000,000. Now, today they gave
him another 100,000,000.
Do you not see a pattern here?
Nothing's going to be different is the point.
Only what you're told outwardly.
Now on the other side of it, as
I said, I'd point this out in reverse.
This is, Lewis Frankel representative. Thank you to
Biden Harris administration for approving additional military sales
to Israel. Israel's security is our security.
I'm grateful to see continued support for our
ally as she faces continued threats from Iran
and proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, who do well,
gee, doesn't that sound like exactly what we
just heard from Trump? Yeah. Because they're all
pointing at the same thing.
And and acting like the other one is
the one that's the guys, it's all the
same direction. It's almost incredible to me now
how this is being diluted down to, like,
the most obvious.
They're all anti Iran. They're all pro Israel.
They're all pro war. They just have these
weird, slightly different flavors to what they're actually
doing. Now you're even seeing the left right
woke side of both and doing the same
things. I don't know why nobody falls for
this anymore.
But at the end of the day,
they're all pushing this direction, even RFK for
crying out loud. How does that not make
you suspicious?
Glenn Greenwald points this out. Michael McFaul says,
the paramount objective for Kamala Harris is to
win this election, which is what they're always
trying to do. They don't care what you
think. It says, if a press conference helps
her win, she shouldn't do it. If a
press conference helps her win, she should do
it. If not, she shouldn't do it. It's
just that simple. Here's what he says. She
has no moral obligation
to talk to the press. Tone it down,
folks.
It's crazy. And so Glenn Nate nails it.
He says, this is the mentality of the
US ruling class, left and right. Or rather,
just the ruling class, guys.
Stated as explicitly as can be. The only
thing that matters is our empowerment.
We have no obligation to be accountable to
anyone. To explain ourselves to any of you,
the peon class.
That's how they see it. If we choose
to do so, it's only because it's in
our interests.
Exactly.
What do you mean you have no obligation
to speak to the president? Like, look how
crazy that is.
They're just being because this is being slowly
brought to where like, this is what Matt,
Eric, and I have talked about in the
past.
These are the actual rulers,
not the pretend puppets. The that are stepping
back out of the shadows again. We've been
convinced all this time that they somehow allowed
us to pick. Now they're coming back around
and going, you know what? You guys can't
because we need to fix everything.
It's happening right in front of us. Israel
is obvious. Now what they're doing, I think,
has exposed a lot of it, but clear
that they still blindly follow it.
Here is John Mesheimer,
professor,
breaking down an important point.
Somebody sent me this clip. I had to
slow it down. It was for some reason,
it was really sped up. So you hear
the voice will be a little bit off.
The point is what they're talking about on
the Judge Napoleano show is the donor class.
And the real point, just like we talked
about immigration, all all of this connects. I
hope you're following along because all of this
ties together.
The donor class
are what keep all of this going.
Like he says, even if all the politicians
just decided they wanted to go in the
direction, and they want and everybody did. The
donor class would only increase their funding.
Doesn't stop. So the point is, not you,
not your politicians, not this they're we're not
in control of this. We don't we're not
driving this bus. And until we can acknowledge
that, we will never change it.
Will not be good for us, and it
will not be good for Israel. What you
wanna understand here and I think this is
something that most Americans don't understand. Please explain.
Israel is in really deep trouble.
It's in really deep trouble today and more
importantly, it has no way out. They were
unable to defeat Hamas in Gaza, number 1.
Number 2, they're stuck in Gaza. Like, they're
not getting out. You remember they left in
2005 because it was a hornet's nest. They're
back in there. Right? Number 3 I honestly
think they want that though. I think that
I mean, it's obvious their settler leaders have
been screaming that they're gonna build settlements like
right now, and they're already doing that. So
that's one part, but just remember that. They
they have no meaningful military solution against Hezbollah.
They cannot defeat Hezbollah. With regard to Iran,
even if they get into a war with
Iran and they launch lots of missiles and
rockets and, aerial attacks at Iran and do
a lot of destruction, Iran will still be
there. And Iran, by the way, is on
the road to acquiring nuclear weapons. So they
have all of those external problems. Then they
have these wicked internal problems which we saw
on display earlier this week surrounding these 9
reservists,
who were arrested for gang raping a Palestinian
prisoner. By the way, that's just the tip
of the iceberg in terms of the horrors
that the Israelis have been inflicting on the
Palestinians. But, anyway, these 9 reservists, who engaged
in this gang rape were arrested. And the
end result is that
broke in to 2 different army bases to,
reverse this arrest. And if you look at
the performance of the police and you look
at the performance of, the reservists in the
IDF, some of whom joined with the protesters,
you see that the Israelis run the real
risk down the road of the civil war.
And finally, you wanna understand that what's on
display these days is manifest evidence that Israel
is heavily dependent on the United States. They
cannot fight these wars. They cannot continue like
this without American support. We have given them
$18,000,000,000
in 2024. Just think about that. $18,000,000,000
and we help them in their military fight
with Iran on April 14th. We are giving
them all sorts of weapon. They need us.
They need us to provide diplomatic support. So
this is not quite the independent country that
Israel likes to think of itself as. It
is heavily dependent on the United States. So
we And they need your blind support.
Right? And that's why all the candidates are
being driven
for whatever their coercion, whatever their blackmail or
funding or bribery, whatever it is. How do
you not miss how do you miss that?
Take all these factors into account. You then
ask yourself a question, how can they get
out of this? Is the law in Lebanon?
Are we serious? They did this in 1982.
They did it in 2006. It was a
disaster. Their army is worn out for what's
happened in Gaza where they haven't beaten Hamas.
They would be insane to invade Lebanon even
if we were to help them. So how
do they fix that problem? How do they
fix the problem in Gaza? It? All of
these problems are unfixable. They are in trouble
and they are digging deeper. And the and
the reason they're digging deeper and the reason
these problems keep getting exacerbated every day in
my view can be it can be stated
in one word, Netanyahu.
Again, you don't wanna blame it all on
Netanyahu. And you wanna remember that there are
people to the right of him.
Exactly.
The game is to make it about Netanyahu
alone so they can keep this all going.
And and, again, the clear as he's gonna
say, the people to the right of it
or the the Gavir and Smotri, they are
even crazier than Netanyahu if that's possible.
Inside of Israel. He is basically a centrist.
He is not, you know, an archway winger.
There's no left to speak of in Israel.
There's sort of a center and a far
right and a right. And, Netanyahu, you can
put him in the center or on the
right. He's not on the far right. But
there are people to the right of him.
And if Netanyahu would go away tomorrow, the
basic problem that I described would not change.
Also, I would note to you that you
cannot underestimate
the responsibility that the donor class has for
causing this problem or causing the set of
problems that Israel faces and perpetuating those problems.
The donor class makes it almost impossible for
the United States to put any pressure on
Israel to act in smarter the United States
to put any pressure on Israel to act
in smarter ways. The government of the United
States, for all its faults, has understood for
a long time that Israel is pursuing suicidal
policies, especially with regard to the occupation. But
we
So it's just simply saying it's clear that
they've known for a long time that Israel's
pursuing suicidal policies.
I think it's obvious someone paying attention. The
US government's very aware they're committing genocide now
that they've been building to this for a
long time. They know all of this.
We cannot put any pressure on Israel simply
because of the donor class. So you wanna
remember that is It's speaking fast, but he's
saying we can't put pressure on it because
of the donor class. That's the Miriam she
the, Miriam Adelsons.
Right? That is the lobbying aspect. That's all
these people that are using those packs to
manipulate our policy,
and they're doing so right in the open.
Israel is digging deeper and deeper and deeper.
It is getting more and more support from
the donor corps class than ever.
When the, right wingers broke into the prison,
did they successfully extract,
the 9 IDF prisoners or are they still
incarcerated for the horrific crimes that they committed?
No. They're still incarcerated.
They broke into the first base at which
point the, Israelis moved the prisoners to a
different base,
north of Tel Aviv, and then the protesters
broke into that base. By that point in
time, the security forces inside of Israel had
forcefully moved, to shut down the protests, and
therefore, the prisoners remained, in jail. And after
that first Now as far as I understand
it, that's not true. Maybe at that moment,
they were, but as far as I understand
it, they've been released. I've seen the videos
of them out and speaking on television shows.
So just thought it's clear. It's breaking the
Knesset actually debated,
in immunity
for, IDF members who abuse, and torture Palestinians.
And at the same time, they debated that.
They, debated whether or not it should be
lawful to put a bullet between the eyes
of Palestinian prisoners, uncharged, un prosecuted, unconvicted because
they need bed space. They need room in
their jails. My god. Democracy has debates like
that. The question I would ask you is
why they why do they even need to
have these debates? They just do this as
a matter of course. Right. This is what
these rallies act. All you have to do
is look at the history of Israeli Palestinian
relations and what happens in Israeli prisons to
understand that this is commonplace behavior. I would
guess the debate was because they wanted to
satisfy the right if this passed and it
was proposed by the Likud, by Netanyahu's coalition.
So it presumably will pass when there's a
vote. But if it passes, then those 9
guys are set free.
Are you gonna be surprised if that happens?
No. I'm not gonna be surprised, but my
my stomach is going to be turned, by
things like that happen under our eyes and
still we give the money. Is there anything
the Israeli government could do that would cause
the American government to say enough is enough?
Right. Not that I could Nothing. I mean,
clearly, that would have happened by now.
It's unreal the amount of steps and pushing
and obfuscation and gaslighting we've seen from the
Matt Millers and and Patel's of the world.
Just blind adherence. Just absolute feckless cowards.
Think of, I hope I'm wrong. But I
just wanna say one other thing on this,
judge. It is important to understand that Israel's
reputation does matter.
It's hard to say exactly how it matters
at this point. But Israel is doing enormous
damage to its reputation inside the United States
and outside of the United States, around the
world. We live in the age of instant
information. Everything that happens inside of Israel is,
almost everything, of any consequences filled. Then those
videos that result are sent around the world,
their stories on front pages of newspapers and
so forth and so on. So people are
well aware of what's going on here. But
this, by the way, is why you have
this real disjuncture between public opinion in the
United States and how congress acts towards Israel.
But the lobby is able to basically use
its leverage on policymakers or politicians to get
what it wants, but it's having the devil
at the time controlling the discourse because it's
so obvious to people what Israel is doing.
And as is the case with you, I
believe it's repulsive to huge numbers of Americans
and huge number of other people outside of
the United States. Yeah. So It's not good
for us. So the bottom line is that
people see it.
They can pay and and control as many
politicians as they want, and they'll still march
forward. But eventually,
hopefully, people like us will reach the masses,
and you'll start to see that it's not.
It's only the the screaming partisan people at
the very tippy top of this of the
paradigm. The rest of us are going, this
is gross.
And just like with COVID, they really want
you to think you're the one Republican that
doesn't see it, or the one Republican that
that that sees it or the you're outside
the box and you're wrong somehow. I'm telling
you, everybody sees it. It's it's a it's
a fact it's a
there are other people involved that don't care,
that blind themselves to it because of their
party, or choose to see it. And I
think clearly the vast majority see it. But
inside the parties themselves, it's different.
The bottom line is, like he said, you
can't control public opinion
with what they're doing.
They can fund as many politicians as they
want, but you see it. Called it out.
Now the problem is that they are doing
this. Like, we've talked about the donor classes
he discussed. Like, we saw Adelson. Well, we
saw this as well. Derek wrote this article
about the Nashville Bitcoin conference. He said the
co opting of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin Nashville, Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and Rumble.
And this whole point is about the idea
of how they're influencing these massive communities.
They're buying them. They're trying to get the
control that he just said they don't have.
That's what this is about.
Here's an example
of the interesting overlap of Bitcoin. Just a
really quick example. It's kind of a deviation
as Sal Diagris points out. As they're coopting
these communities, as Trump stood up and says
that, you know, really, the opposite of the
reality, which is that the the bit bitcoin
is not a threat to the dollar. Yeah.
The whole point is bitcoin is supposed to
be a threat to the dollar. That's the
reality of this background.
But he also goes on to talk about
how we're gonna take the confiscated bitcoin and
make that some kind of reserve currency. No,
guys. That's the exact opposite of what we
should want from this.
He's trying to mainstream this as opposed to
use it to fight the broken system that
we don't want. He's turning it into the
broken system. That's a CBDC. That's where they're
going with this. The bottom line here is
that he's saying oh, I shouldn't say that
is a CBDC, but it's the same game.
It's the same direction.
But guess what? He says US government transfers
$494,000,000
of Bitcoin that they stole from Ross Ulbricht
Ulbricht O'Bryte to the Coinbase Wallet.
Okay. Well, here's what's interesting. How much would
a bet the republicans are gonna call this
the the democrats and Biden's administration taking Bitcoin?
Wasn't exactly what he Trump just said that's
what they would
do. Move take it and move it into
a location. Okay. So what's the difference? You
only like that when Trump does it?
It's only not a wrong thing when Trump
takes it? I mean, it's it's just another
politician putting in control of the US government.
And until we can see it that way,
you're gonna be lost by this stuff, or
you don't want to see.
Your government is stealing money.
It's the same thing in any direction.
Now, w Whitney wrote an excellent article about
one of the people behind Trump, Theo.
The man behind Trump's VP pick is worse
than you think, and it's an excellent article.
We've already gone over this pretty in-depth.
The point is that these are the donor
class, guys. That's what we're talking about. They
are the ones actually controlling a lot of
this, and most of them tie back to
Israel. Now on Kamala's side, it's the same
thing. One, it's obvious she gets, what, like,
$1,000,000 from APAC. It's somewhere around there. But
on top of that, here's Forbes writing about
this as of the, June, July 2024.
Kamala Harris and Wall Street. Here's who's backing
her this time. Well, guess
what?
Among financiers reportedly backing Harris are billionaires Jonathan
Gray, president of asset manager Blackstone.
That's Israel.
Mark let or overlap. Mark Mark Lasry of
Credit Investment from Avenue Capital Management and Hedge
Fund Baron George Soros.
Come on, guys. If we can't see that
all these money trails lead back to Israel,
then you don't want to. And the problem
is that you only can see this as
she's the lefty radical fighting against Israel despite
that's where her funding is coming from. You're
just playing into the partisan narratives.
It's just not the truth.
Now as Derek Derek wrote on the, August
13th of 2024,
what role will Google's Eric Schmidt play in
election 2024? Now the overarching point of this
is he usually vote lean you know, funds
democrat.
He has occasionally gone the other direction.
Right now, apparently, he hasn't really thrown in
with anybody, I guess, at least at when
he wrote this. But it's this is the
main thing he writes at the beginning. At
the end of the day, no matter which
corporate party Americans vote for,
a Bilderberg backed candidate will be in the
White House.
Now whether you think Bilderberg is the important
aspect or just whatever it is, we're talking
about nothing to do with the left right
paradigm, with the they're playing you. It's the
elitist class, the predator class, the political class
who are all playing you to be in
power. That's all this is. And we can't
see it.
I know. It's my opinion. But I think
the evidence is there. I think at every
other moment, we're calling out calling calling out
one part of it. But just fail to
see the bigger picture when it comes to
the partisan
divide. Whitney wrote this about JD Vance, who's
JD Vance owns his entire owes his entire
career to Peter Thiel,
who helped create the domestic terror panopticon for
the CIA that targets Trump supporters and detractors
alike.
Which is true.
So it just it shows you that the
elitist class use these like anything else. And
the point is you're using funding from people
that have driven in the very thing that
is putting specifically republicans in jail. And it
says the field created Palantir
to rescue total information awareness, a DARPA surveillance
program created by the same people behind the
continuity of government protocols to suspend the constitution
and round up unfriendly Americans during a national
crisis. Now right now, you wanna pretend that's
all these people supporting Palestine.
30 seconds ago, it was people in red
hats. Now you wanna pretend that's because Democrats
are in power. Well, what happens when they
get in power next and this thing's installed?
The point is that it's always aimed against
people inconvenient
to the power structure.
And you know who's almost usually almost always
the focal point? Gun owners and constitutionalists.
I'm sure you can connect those dots.
It says the database with those unfriendly Americans
still exists. And the last report on it
from 2008 stated that it contained the names
of 3,000,000 Americans. It still exists. And Thiel's
Palantir,
also now funding the Trump fans ticket directly,
decides who goes on that list.
Theo helped resurrect another DARPA surveillance program called
LifeLog
using his early investment at Facebook to mold
the social network to serve LifeLog's original purpose.
LifeLog was closed down the same day Facebook
launched. Same thing we're seeing here.
Right? Whether Palantir or Facebook or the the
building of this well, there it's gonna be
privatized. And that's what we're seeing happening with
Thiel, with maybe even JPMorgan,
Jamie Dimond,
their private coin.
Trump promised no CBDCs, but when you make
it a privatized aspect, well, it's the same
thing. They're talking about him being part of
the cabinet.
He says Palantir's first funder was the CIA's
In Q Tel, and the CIA was their
only client until 2008.
The one CIA official involved in guiding Palantir's
early years, Alan Wade, is a former business
partner of Ghislaine Maxwell's sister, Christine, in the
company, Chiliad.
The other field funded and back camp companies
like Clearview AI used the fact that they
helped ID and imprison
those present at the capitol on January 6th
as part of their sales pitch. After January
6th, Clearview's business with law enforcement grew 26%.
These sound like Republican
supporters, don't they?
It says while Phil has been described as
libertarian or alt right, Palantir CEO Alex Karp
told the New York Times in 2020 that
his long held fear that the American far
right would murder him for being Jewish, propels
a lot of decisions made by the company.
How do we miss how do we ignore
stuff like this? Again, I'm of the mind
that most conservatives, if you don't know this,
you're hearing it now, and it might change
your mind.
But then you turn around and look at
those republicans who are leading the charge with
these people acting like if you don't support
them, you're no longer part of their party.
Blindly supporting a genocide.
If you have any
integrity, any you know, you must feel that
these things are wrong.
And I know you do, probably while you're
watching.
It says Palantir is also a major driver
of free crime and predictive policing. Another Theo
backed company, Carbine 911, that we just went
over in-depth the other day, seeks to bring
precrime to 911 call centers. Carbine is intimately
tied to Israeli intelligence
and received at least $1,000,000 in funding from
Jeffrey Epstein. We just went over Carbine. We
just went over the invasive unit in 200
connected companies that are in I mean, it's
just crazy how obviously this is being in
it's infiltration.
Exactly what we keep we just started talking
about today. They said that she finishes by
saying there's a lot more in the article,
but Theo is and that's the article we
were pointing to earlier.
Is do Thiel is due to be hugely
influential in a second Trump administration, especially now
that Vance is his VP. The fact that
Thiel built the tools for the CIA to
target dissident from left and right based on
online activity should concern everybody.
Here he is telling
you that their recent chat GPT aspect passed
the Turing test in 2023.
And what do you know? Right after that
on Twitter, we saw this bot explosion where
they go, you know, we can't even tell
them from human anymore. Ladies and gentlemen, that's
what the Turing test is.
Surprising
and strangely
unexpected thing that happened is, that,
in some sense, what o OpenAI with chat
GPT 3.54
achieved in late 22, early 23
was you passed the Turing test, which,
was not superintelligence. It's not godlike. It's not,
low tech,
surveillance.
But that had been the holy grail of
AI for 60 or 70 years. And it's
a it's a fuzzy line. The Turing test
is you have a computer that can convince
you that it's a human being, and it's
a somewhat fuzzy line because sometimes but but
it pretty clearly hadn't been passed before. It
pretty clearly is passed now, And
that's a that's a really extraordinary
achievement.
It's extremely
it raises all sorts of interesting big picture
questions. What does it mean, you know, you
know, you know, what what does it what
does it mean to be a human being
in 2024?
You know, the sort of placeholder answer I
would've been tempted to give a couple of
years ago would be something like, you know,
the Noam Chomsky idea that, you know, something
very important about language. This is what sets
humans apart from all the other animals. We
talk to each other, and we have these
rich semantics and text things. And so if
a computer can,
replicate that, you know, what does that mean
for all of us in this room? And
so it's, it's it's, it's an extraordinary development,
and it was also That's terrifying. Even though
it had been the holy grail
somehow in the last decade before, it was
not expected at all. And, and so there's,
yeah, there's something, you know, very significant about
it and very underrated.
Yeah. Yeah. What does it mean to be
human now? Well, Courtney and I were just
talking about this, and a lot of these
people, like I mean, Theo was the focal
point of that conversation, at least started it,
about these elitists in the background of technocracy
who are actually driving us on a direct
Matt Ehrich just wrote an article about this.
Right? Some call you're basically driving this ideology
that it's it's kind of devoid of moral
reason. And the idea of being, you know,
if if you're redefining,
it's I I think he calls it the
deification of self, devoid of moral reason moral
reasoning.
I mean, these people are presenting themselves as
they I mean, that's more abstract than I
wanna get into today for this conversation. But
at the end of the day, what he's
saying right there,
posing the question at the very existence of
this makes you question what means to be
human. Guys, this is technocracy and they're driving
you in this direction to normalize
I mean, very anti human concepts. We saw
this during COVID 19 as well. My point
in bringing up today is not to get
into that right now, but the idea
that what he's highlighting there are bots
that can act like humans and you can't
tell the difference. Well, that's exactly what we
were just discussing. That's literally what we were
just discussing on 13th August. Israeli election interference
and psychological
operations
industrial complex. This guy's name is Tal Hanon,
who was made famous by The Guardian and
Howrettes in 2,023
discussing
this exact thing. Being paid to successfully
manipulate,
I mean, putting person people in power they
want as as opposed to what the people
vote for,
27
worldwide presidential elections.
27
discussing how they have entire teams of 30,000
strong bots they can use online to manipulate
what you think and cause riots and cause
chaos and even potentially kill people should you
pay them enough. That's what they're talking about.
He is an Israeli spy. It's it was
all broken down in corporate media. But weirdly
enough, we can't factor this into the conversation
about whether and on the record, he talks
to he test he and that's not like
a in court of law, but he he
he he claims that he has influenced US
elections.
I don't know why we would question that.
That whether it's funding or whatever else, it's
obvious.
Now make sure you watch this. I mean,
it isn't a it's an in-depth breakdown of
this very this whole conversation, as well as
all the tangential parts to this. All the
different ways we can prove that Israel's absolutely
manipulating this stuff. Now I'm gonna include this.
James Lee, who we just had an interview
with about the ADL.
The obvious, it says the true nature of
the ADL and how it spies on Americans
for Israel.
Here, let me just grab this for you
real quick.
There we go.
Oh wait no, I don't have James. That's
the full interview I think.
Let's do ADL. Hold on. I'm pretty sure
I have this here. Here we
go. Is
an Israeli spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel.
Have the power to monitor social media activity
across all major platforms
and change social media algorithms the way they
see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan
Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL. We work
with YouTube to have we to get them
to change their algorithms. We work with Facebook
on trying to use a redirect method. So
when you search for holocaust, you get directed
to, like, a Yad Vashem
page.
We opened a center in Silicon Valley back
in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL. We're monitoring all this stuff, and
we're working with all the platforms, by the
way. Google and Think about how brazen that
is. Like, he just didn't he the point
is that's impunity, what you're looking at. Knowing
he could just brag about how this that's
crazy. It's changed today. It's changing,
anyway.
But that's impunity right there.
He's literally monitoring
Americans. Like, that's not what any ADL or
otherwise is not supposed to be doing. Not
even the social media companies are supposed to
be doing that. Not the way he's describing
it, but doesn't matter.
Say about Israel, you're racist apparently. YouTube and
Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam and
You get the point.
So we had this great interview and make
sure you check this out. Now, we did
a little clip on the,
the discussion we just had.
He put this out on the 14th.
And then about the about Tal Hanan and
the the breakdown, get a little,
TikTok clip of this. So I wanna play
that so you get the gist of it.
Here's a story that's gone under the radar.
Cal Hanon, aka Jorge, a former special forces
operative.
Here's a clip.
Guilty of running one of the largest
disinformation
operations
in history.
The Marker, Radio France, Haaretz, and The Guardian
says that a team of Israeli contractors who
claim to have manipulated more than 30 elections
around the world using hacking,
sabotage, and automated disinformation on social media has
been exposed in a new investigation.
The unit is run by Tal Hanan, a
50 year old former Israeli special forces operative
who now works privately using the pseudonym Jorge
and appears to have been working under the
radar in elections in various countries around the
world for more than 2 decades. We're talking
about countries all around the world.
Europe,
Asia,
bunch of African countries, even the United States.
The investigation goes on to also expose that
Hanan controlled a multinational
army of more than 30,000 avatars complete with
digital backstories that stretch back years. We have
thousands of thousands
of followers.
Each and every one of them multilayered. It
means they have Facebook and Instagram
and Twitter and
YouTube channel and Telegram and whatever you want.
Yeah. You get the point. Make sure you
watch the full interview or my my brother
my full show on that. Because what's as
usual,
demonstrating our value. Now this I saw that
shared by somebody else online who I shouted
out in my show.
But we were ahead of the curve because
right now it's, as of 14th, 15th, and
say and today, it is populating all over
social media.
Like Ian Carroll going, look at this story
that nobody's seen. It's like, well, yeah, we
broke it down in 14th. Much more in-depth,
but we don't get included in those share
circles apparently. But either way,
it's important to see that typically we are
pretty far ahead of these stories because of
what, you know, because of your support,
Period. Now on top of that, the point
about
the APAC aspect of this. So late James
Lee and I discussed his breakdown, his investigation
of the ADL,
which is as I played to you, but
it's very clear. The ADL acts like it's
not, it it it's a it's a extension
of the Israeli government. It's on the record.
It is a spy agency for the Israeli
government. They've explicitly stated this in many cases.
Here is APAC, the lobbying group we just
got them discussing. I'm not gonna play this
clip again. It's about 5 minutes long. But
it's it's even on MSNBC,
which doesn't matter who says it. I don't
trust NBC now. The point is that they
say it or rather the statement that they're
saying aren't easily provably and true. I've shown
you this many times in the past. APAC
is influencing
policy. And even he says it in the
interviews or the the point the clip here
that they made a shift
recently into direct policy as opposed to just
more abstract funding. Why? Because they're failing.
That's why.
And so APAC literally on 14th tweeted this
out. Bring being pro Israel is good policy
and good politics. APAC is proud to have
helped a 111 Democrats.
You mean all those extremist racist jihadists that
Trump just told you we shouldn't be yeah.
Or not at all. Really, just other parts
of our government. They support in any way
they can because Israel is desperate to control
the government.
The point is it's left and right, doesn't
matter, and they're constantly, yeah, look at this.
I simply said thank you for admitting it.
Play this clip, APAC's influence. It's a shocking
clip if you haven't seen it. And this
is just back and forth the same thing.
Learn from MSNBC? I said no, it's not
learning from them. It's the facts that are
presented, which doesn't matter who's presenting them. The
truth is the truth. I think that's important
to consider.
I'll include this thread the censored man breaks
down showing you that on Twitter,
Elon Musk personally is working with a company,
CHEQ,
that he got personally asked to bring on
by Netanyahu. He went there and saw him,
met him, came back, instituted a group that
supposed to fight Israeli bots, but is literally
a go group that uses Israeli bots, just
like we just showed you. And what's even
more interesting, as as if we've all seen
Israeli bots explode in the platform since that,
Sensors Man points out that he was able
to see these bot farms using the likes.
Because they had this weird way what they
they like he says, they would have 60
likes, but 5 views. It's a it was
an automated thing.
Then, almost on a dime, the next day
after he pointed this out, they made likes
not visible anymore. And just like that, he
was unable to see the bot farms. But
if you listen to Elon, he's turned them
all. He's he's removed them all by hiring
an Israeli bot farm.
Right?
Telling you guys, it's all it's I've never
seen an easier example to see the how
obviously we're being played. Now we've already passed
4 hours.
I'm gonna I wanna show you this, but
this wasn't the most important part. Well, I'll
I'll bring this up tomorrow more so. But
I just think this is actually absolutely mind
blowing. Because what what I was gonna go
over is this part. I'm gonna just quickly
show you the part of this,
thread, this list of the most popular important
to tellers.
I was gonna highlight the over the the
monkeypox
COVID 19 Trump overlap. We're gonna go into
that tomorrow. I just don't have time. I
wanna go through this in-depth. It's more it's
an important overlap. My my general point in
case you're right now on the worry about
it is, you know, I see all where
this is going with the declaration of emergency
and all that. I see it being hyped
like usual from the typical manipulators on the
right. But
I'm I don't know if this I'm still
not convinced this is gonna go the direction
of the whole the COVID rehash for for
multiple reasons, especially with the monkeypox. This is
not this is not the first time they've
even declared this emergency. They didn't do anything
with last time. I'd say that they won't
this time. But just, you know, just temper
yourself because I'm worried that these very just
like I told you, the very same people
you might expect out there, the people's voice
and the Stew Peters, they're, oh my god.
It's all real this time and we can
prove it. It's all up and running. You
know, maybe.
Lot they said the same thing last time
at the start of last hype, which they
all benefited from. So just be careful.
Wait for the facts. Worry about I mean,
I'm I'm I'll highlight the worries of where
this is going. I've already been a lot
of breakdown. I'll include all the links, by
the way, if you wanna go through it
anyway. But I will talk about it more
tomorrow. I'll include the interview with,
Taylor Hudak
and
Christian Perron, professor,
breaking down the monkeypox and the true nature
of the public health organizations way back in
May 28, 2022,
and the breakdown around this and what we
should be concerned about and so on, As
well as the flu vaccines they're currently pushing
for the bird flu aspect, which remember don't
forget that remember don't forget. Don't forget that
the
influenza vaccines they're giving actually increase your risk
of other illnesses in particular coronavirus, but let's
not talk about that as they push this
right before the next hype. So it's very
possible.
But a lot of these hyping platforms are
pushing the idea that they're pushing, that he's
calling mega lockdowns and they're all ordering everybody.
It's not true. That's not happened yet and
they're not doing that.
I I would not be surprised for a
second if it happened, but it still matters
that they lie about these things. I know
I've taken an issue with that one platform,
but they are lying to a lot of
people. And a lot of them will.
That's what they do.
Whether left or right.
The point though is that they did declare
an emergency, so we need to keep this
on our radar. But, yeah, I can show
you a lot of emergencies so far that
have m outed to nothing. But it's all
about tools. They have the tools at their
disposal. They could declare an emergency for this,
then use the emergency actions for something else.
So it's just important to be careful, especially
with the possibility that's part I'm sure a
lot of the novirus crowd are coming after
them and saying, well, that's not even real.
Maybe they're right. Consider the fact that it
may be nothing at all
as opposed to the big next dangerous thing
they're actually gonna do this time, which is
also possible. Now all of that's to say
I'll cover that in-depth tomorrow.
This is one of the most ridiculous things
I've seen. I said a few here do
some good work, and I mean that, albeit
very partisan,
which, you know, for me is a big
problem.
But many are outright deceivers
who've repeatedly,
repeatedly been caught lying and or misinforming
due to either a shocking lack of due
diligence or simply an interest in misleading people
for their own political agenda. Musk being one
of them, by the way. But what's funny
is it's put on by Tara Bull and
she lists herself on the list, which is
number 1, apparently.
That seems strange to me. I don't know.
It's a weird thing to do. It's typical
for this kind of partisan hubris mentality. But
the point is, if you go through the
clown world,
really, she frames this as
30 accounts with integrity that you want to
follow.
Real journalism.
Clown world?
Cat turd?
Libs of TikTok? I mean, come on, guys.
Like, nobody
genuine in this field could take this seriously.
Now I'll point out, like, during COVID or
during the trans conversation, for example, that they
put out because because they had an interest
in going after it from a partisan angle,
but they still I've shared some of the
stuff they put out. But if we're gonna
genuinely pretend like these people are objective non
partisan journalists,
they don't even pretend non partisan's necessary anymore.
That's the part the left's the good the
bad side, the right's the good side. Just
like childlessly binary.
The point is that these are partisan, 1st.
Secondarily,
have
been provably
shown to share things that are embarrassingly
wrong and never followed up to correct or
knowingly lied. Some of which I've shown you
that you'll recognize.
I
mean, some of these people are notorious for
doing this.
Someone like,
Bloomberg, for example, Chuck Costello. I've called out
a couple times recently. 1 about COVID, around
the dead bodies during the beginning of the,
you know, the Israel. They he said they
were dead babies burned in a dumpster. No.
They were Hamas members and we later proved
that. But why where'd that come from? How
could he have known? Or he's the one
that shared the fake crowd conversation that Trump
got taken by around Kamala.
And never did I say that they wouldn't
fake a crowd or that they wouldn't pay
people, but it was easy to prove that
that was a crowd that was there.
And yet somebody even got caught saying I
was just being a satire accountant, so I
get deleted. But nonetheless, he shared it. Trump
shared it, and it became a viral sensation.
I bet you there are people that chat
right now telling me that I got played
and it was a fake crowd because that's
how this works.
Forever,
it becomes a thing even though it was
easy to prove.
There you go.
I mean, it it's just kind of embarrassing,
but there's a lot out there.
And here is Fiorel Isabelle saying pretty much
every single one of them are sensational scrifters
who don't do news, but just post news
from actual journalists. Well, that's actually the main
point.
Not almost every single one of them on
there are simply
reposting, which is there's a good part of
that this field for people that collect. I
mean, that's lar that's largely what I do
at the time is aggregating information that I
think is important.
But the point is that to frame but
I also do my own personal long term
investigations on things that I my own work.
So that's all part of journalism, but the
point is to frame all these people who
are
collecting
mostly corporate media stuff and repopulating it in
certain partisan ways. That's not I mean, that's
she says that's why Elon supports
them. I think this is about the creation
of it's like this is like the Twitter
files next part 2. You're creating an at
the new as Steve and I have been
talking about for a long time, the recreation
of journalism, Twitter files based on the opposite
of it.
Blind statements of partisan interest or blindly showing
screenshots without doing due diligence like they did
many times throughout the Venezuela conversation.
Oh, she has it right there.
Mario Narf Narfall, one of these weirdly out
of nowhere sensations after the Twitter files dynamic.
When, by the way, if you just look,
he's wrong all the time. Half the time,
he just repackages the corporate media narrative in
a weird in a slight slant towards the
right. And they all love it. And Elon
goes, exactly, and jams him up to the
top. Or goes, wow, or yes, in these
one word responses, which, as BX pointed out,
I think are bots for Elon. But it's
what it says. Elon, colon,
citizen journalism outpaces legacy media, which I agree
with, but not what they're pointing at. He
says citizen journalists journalism from actual domain experts,
so hardly the people we just pointed to,
and people actually on the ground, none none
of the people we're pointing to, maybe other
than the ones that go to certain situations
to misrepresent, in my opinion, is much faster,
more accurate, and has less bias in the
legacy media. I agree with that statement. Just
not directed to the people they're highlighting there.
But here's the point. Source
Dogecoin account.
Well, guess what?
That is not from Dogecoin.
That is from
wherever they got that data from. Wherever that
little icon at the bottom is.
But yet it gets framed as the source
is whoever posted it on Twitter. Now here's
a really important thing to see here out
of this. This is one of this is
another extension of Twitter files. So the source
is the source.
That's what I talked about during Twitter files,
the illusion.
Not just a screenshot and somebody's clout around
it, whether you trust them or not, but
the actual source material that you could comb
through for context, for nuance,
for the full picture. We never got that.
So in this case,
if you post this online and go source
is this person's Twitter account, well, that's not
the source. The source is where you got
the data from. The source is where the
quote came. That's the game that's being played.
So now we're removing the source.
Twitter file, you don't even need source material,
but now we're gonna repurpose that and go,
well, the source is where you saw it.
That's Twitter. No. It's not.
I'm telling you, these are all long term
manipulations, whether they even know it or not.
And the breed and to act like this
is the new me
citizen journalism
is something we should all actively lean into,
but the game of trying to collect this
is some kind of it's like these are
like little toys he's collected on his shelf.
All these people that mindlessly go, yay, Elon,
you're doing the thing that we can all
prove you're not.
They're being promoted. They're making lots of money.
And at the end of the day, if
you look at that list again,
very few of them are sharing things like,
I would argue at the best, some of
them are sharing what they think ultimately can
be misled by the partisanship, but old sometimes
share pretty some good things.
The vast majority
are willful deceivers.
And yet, this is supposed to be your
new citizen journalist. My bigger point is that
he is driving them into the position that
they always said they would become.
Not even remotely the vast majority of people
on this platform who are just doing what
they think is right or breaking down at
the way they see it even if they
end up being wrong. But what he's doing,
in my opinion, whether intentionally or not, is
the pied piper of exactly what they told
them they would be. You are making them
spread misinformation and then turning around and going,
they're lying about us spreading misinformation.
Well, no. You have a right to. That
is free speech, but you are in fact
doing that. And I'm not coming at a
left position. I think the left and the
right, rather the game is colluding to push
you into a position where they manufacture just
what they need. Just like I said in
the beginning where the right is being played
with January 6th, right, or the right is
being played with whatever we're talking about here.
Remember I told you they're trying to put
frame you as white supremacists and Nazis? It's
the same damn thing. You're now being framed
as the misinformers, but they're turning you into
it just like I told you they were
trying to do during that time.
Taking the people that were and highlighting them
as what the right was even though it
wasn't what you all were.
God. Just wish people could take a step
back and see how obvious this all is,
how you're being played.
Casey Wright makes a good point. One of
these major accounts that they that Elon in
particular always brings to the top. I meme,
therefore I am, who's I showed you, put
up a lot of false things during Venezuela
and plenty of other conversations.
I think that was him. Point is right
now, I'm I the account
is featured at the top of 4 different
trending topics. Just to be clear by the
way, so I'm more accurate on this. I've
seen this account share a lot of partisan
leaning misinformation.
But that's free speech, he has the right
to do it. My point is I'm pretty
sure, which I shouldn't have said if I'm
not sure, but I'm thinking about the Venezuela
overlap. I'm 90% sure that this was one
of the ones that was surfacing the the
the point about Elon. But anyway, the point
is,
he says,
this account is the feature at the top
of 4 different trending topics.
Inflation is the only one that contains the
word.
The rest of them have him at the
top of the topic, but don't have any
word that would relate him to the
topic. Look at the picture, and you'll see
what I mean.
To inflation, look, the word inflation pops up.
When he searches for the Logan Act,
well, look, there's no mention of the Logan
Act over here. Whoopi. No mention of whoopi.
Over here, endorse Trump. No man. But weirdly,
he's still at the very top. Which is
like a, you know, like a 1000000 follower
count or whatever it is, 100 of 1000.
To me, I think it's very obvious. I
think these people are being algorithmically driven because
it's it's probably
against what they what's their interest. They may
think it's benefiting in the moment, but you're
being used.
They're driving you up to present you as
the leading examples of what's happening here when
all they're trying to do is lead you.
Go look. Here's the misinformers. We're convincing them
or or we're we're bolstering them or even
they're profiting more when they share the fake
information. So the left or whatever you else
wanna call this dynamic turns around and says,
look, they're lying. And then they are. I
can prove to you that what they said
was false. But they push back,
and all you do is frame everybody on
Twitter as being these massive misinformed and what
does that lead to?
Suppression, censorship, digital
info. I mean, Elon's driving you there. He's
the one that told you his self himself
that we're gonna verify everybody on Twitter.
So how do you stop the misinformers? Well,
you make sure we know who you are.
It's amazing that people can't see how this
is playing out.
This person says, the entire media is running
a disin for misinformation
campaign. Well, it would technically be a disinformation
campaign if you're doing it deliberately against Elon,
but I'll I have different conversation. As x
continues to grow, these attacks on Elon and
his campaign companies will become more frequent.
Well, let's be clear about this again. And
he just responds by, it's wild. That's what
I'm talking about.
The point is that Elon is, as I've
shown I mean, I can't even I can't
even count how many times. Sharing things that
I've shown you are false. Now I can't
prove to you he's doing it on purpose.
Venezuela was constant. Things that he was own
his own the the Twitter,
Twitter itself.
Community notes was like, that's fake. Nope. Those
are air conditioners. Nope. That's not the right
location. Nope. But over and over during Venezuela,
he never cared. He didn't follow-up and say
anything. He only deleted one of them.
So he is spreading misinformation. But let me
be clear. As again, for the thousandth time,
this is what free speech
is a part of.
Now to be clear,
Twitter itself
has allowed people back on, myself included.
But what I've always pointed out is it's
not so much about the suppression. I mean,
Israel
conversation is being outright censored. We've already seen
that as much as a lot of the
right doesn't wanna acknowledge it. But my point
about what's happening is social engineering right now.
The whole point is making allowing you to
be on here saying all these things so
they can then frame that in a certain
way. My point is though that it doesn't
matter.
Free speech includes
misinformation. That's the whole point. So the more
you allow the platform to become actual free
speech, the more you're gonna have elements of
misinformation.
But I think what's actually happening is the
massive suppression of honest content and the massive
inflation
or in, raising up of the ones who
are actually not doing due diligence. So it
creates that impression. Like, he's making you into
what they want you to be. That's how
I would see that. But it's all my
opinion.
At the end of the day,
from my perspective, no matter what's happening, nobody
should be calling for censorship. We just need
to be engaging with this honestly and recognize
that the dynamic
is still
not I mean, you're not on Elon's side.
If my opinion's correct and I think it's
pretty clear,
you feel like you are up until the
moment that you're actually put in that position
because of the fact that he put you
where, you know, the misinformation field. Like, you're
gonna be you're gonna create the very technocratic
gulag that we're all being pushed into.
I'll leave it there.
Now on top of that,
as Casey Wright points out, and here's,
what's his name again?
Mike Mike Pence. Mike Pence speaking with the
real real America's voice. I won't play it
for you. The point is he's he's outlining
how GARM
was shut down, but that it was essentially
meaningless because the system they built can operate
without them. And I said, well, what do
you know? It's exactly the point. Because the
overall reality of this is that Twitter on
July 1st repartnered with Garm. And then they
make this weird
lawsuit, which most people told me would seem
pretty toothless,
with you know, based on what they were
really aiming at. And at the end of
the day, they just went away.
This $1,000,000,000
comp really? I mean, come on. It didn't
make any sense as Casey pointed out as
well, and I agree with him. But now
and my point was, what? This doesn't add
up. They're they're
working with Garm as they realign with nobody
pointed that out. And as they're doing that,
to Elon's out there going, yay. Fight them.
And you guys partnered with them. Then as
a part of them, you sue them, and
then they dissolve?
To me, that seemed wildly manufactured. But I
could be wrong. But my point is, guess
what? The actual apparatus
didn't go away.
And how much you wanna bet? They're still
in it. I mean, and I I Look,
I I I don't think I have this
off,
readily accessible, unfortunately. It just popped into my
head. But I remember that the lawsuit itself,
inside the lawsuit that that Twitter filed, it
explicitly states that they're already adhering to the
GARM standard, if not exceeding it. It it
said verbatim that.
So then what's going on? Why are you
pushing back if you're already meeting their obligations?
Because I think it was a manipulation.
That that was all to make you think
he was pushing back against it when in
reality they're part of it, guys. They're part
of it.
Linda Yaccarino, for crying out loud. She's from
the World Economic Forum. I know you guys
see that.
Now I think I might just leave it
there.
Yeah. This last part was gonna get into
misinformation.
This week's ridiculous video. Yeah. I'm gonna also
go back to this tomorrow.
End of the day, Jimmy Dore just simply
points
out CNN's the biggest spread of misinformation about
every single important news story in recent history.
But I would simply argue and and then
you got this clip down here of CNN
calling
x Twitter a haven for misinformation.
We'll end on this point, but I think
the important point to make here, I agree
with Jimmy, but so is Fox.
And even I mean, what's funny about it
is most republicans started pointing that out during
and after the COVID conversation, that Fox just
went rhino or whatever. Well, the point is
that the mind the corporate media, all of
it, left and right, are all the biggest
because they're all the same thing in my
opinion. They come from a different flavor just
like the left and the right. But to
point out that only CNN, not that single
Jimmy's doing that, he's saying it because they're
calling out Twitter and I'll make that point
next. But that
CNN
is a deliberate propaganda camp platform. So is
Fox News. In my opinion, so is groups
like OAN and these different sub corporate media
platforms, all the mainstream alternative media. But the
point
is that x is a haven for misinformation
for two reasons. 1, because, like I just
said, I think that's being deliberately manufactured. But
2, because it always will be when you
allow people in some cases, because it's very
selective right now, to express what they wanna
say. So it's who cares if it's a
spread? Because that's free speech.
If we leaned into this and made sure
people just had discernment and, you know, personal
responsibility,
then you don't need to be the protectors
of what we think and feel. Because that
shouldn't be a thing anyway.
The problem is we should want that. We
should acknowledge that things are allowed to be
that people are allowed to lie, people can
be incorrect.
But to to reflexively jump in and go,
no. It's CNN.
That's I think we're being baited.
It's not CNN versus Twitter. It is the
corporate media
all lying to you and Twitter, in my
opinion, being part of the establishment. I mean,
Whitney just laid it out for him in
the last interview. I I hope this stuff
sticks with him. But I know it's hard
because Whitney lays out so much information.
The reality though, I think it's quite obvious
that they're all against us. All of them.
Any last things I think I wanna include,
and I'll go over this tomorrow.
You'll enjoy it. We'll get into monkeypox and
the overlap. The conversation from Trump talking about
I mean, this one's him talking about
more lockdowns, wherever that is. Right here.
Recent.
Anyway, we'll come back to it. Unfortunately, I
do have to go.
We'll leave it there 4 and a half
hours.
Didn't intend for it to be this long,
but I am gonna do a show tomorrow.
That's my that's my plan unless something crazy
happens because I'm I know I've got the
time. So, I'm gonna try to break this
down with whatever new stuff. That's what I
like about it when I actually get a
show every day is that I don't have
to recap the things that I've been organizing
but I just look at the information on
the day, I cover whatever, you know, kind
of ongoing research I've been doing and I
break down some of the newer points. I
mean, I'd love to get in that habit.
It's just about timing for me right now.
And on the way out, guys, as you
know, you know, we're we're under more attack
than I think I've ever seen.
Nothing that I've ever seen in the process
in the time that TLav has ever existed.
So we need the support.
You're out there listening, and you've got the
means. We need support right now. We we
really do because at this point, I'm I'm
I And like I said, I'm gonna get
more into it. I briefly mentioned the other
day, I probably said more than I should
because my my lawyer is, you know, now
that we're gonna be taking a little bit
different action, it's We're kinda back in the
same point where it's not wise for me
to lay out the what direction we're gonna
take. But
I'm not gonna just lay over for this.
And I'm gonna try to I mean, either
way, it's gonna cost me money is the
point. And and more action with my lawyer
is gonna cost more and, like, I'm my
lawyer is convinced as well, but I am
convinced that this is weaponized, that they are
abusing this is lawfare against TLAB. I mean,
it's all completely in line. I mean, there's
2 of these law firms are are it's
all about Israel content and the one's literally
based in Jerusalem and I don't I find
it impossible to see that. And I think
it's obvious that what's happened we just we're
going over everything that shows you these are
the things that they weaponize. The Israeli Zionist
manipulators. Not all Israelis are all Jews. The
point though is that as this continues,
it's going to take time away from what
we need to do. And I'd like to
be able to grow in ways that we
can maybe stop that from happening. And I'd
love to be able to bring on more
people. I'd love to be able to, you
know bottom line, I'm not gonna stop as
I always tell you. No matter what. I'm
gonna keep doing this no matter where I'm
doing it from, no matter how I can.
But the continuation of what we've built here,
what what we have built here, is so
important to me.
And so if you're out there, again, if
you've got the means and you wanna help
us, now is the time. I mean, I
I it's and as always,
nothing you do is gonna be able to
influence, like my point if somebody out there
is like here we're gonna give you a
$1,000 now let me tell you what to
say tomorrow. It's not gonna happen
period.
I will never allow donations or funding or
backing whatever else to influence my ability my
ability to
honestly break down what I see as the
truth.
But my point though is that we definitely
need that support.
If you know somebody out there that is
interested in this and believes in objective nonpartisan
content and wants to help us grow, reach
out to me. We need it. Now, hopefully,
we got some new things coming, like with
the the above book and different things that
we can use to help generate revenue for
this platform in ways that we believe in,
like with privacy devices. But right now,
it is an important time.
So thank you for being here. Thank you
for sharing this work. Make sure you break
it down in clips, Share it with your
friends. Talk about it. Have conversations about this
stuff. Try to reach people with this that
need to hear it, but in very objective,
nonpartisan ways and have you know, most times
if you wanna reach them, come from a
position that's not partisan.
Align with them in something and break this
stuff down and add it to the conversation
because people are
they're being guarded. They're being driven to be
on guard against anything that's perceived as the
other side.
And that's the problem in and of itself.
We're not,
be able to have
constructive conversations with people that think, different than
we do. I mean, that's the whole point
of how I mean, how civilization works. We
need to be able to have this conversation,
diplomacy, whatever else it is. That's what we're
always trying to build. So help us build
the world that we all know we want.
We see it. See that glimmer of hope.
I see the possibility. Help me get there.
I love you all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.