Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
August 8, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today. I apologize
for the long gap between the shows.
Ultimately, you guys know that I'm dealing with
a lot of stuff around the sides. But
one thing I didn't think about was I've
got interviews I've been scheduling.
And then the days where I've been really
finding the openings, I have to make sure
those come out as well. And so there's
been a sort of a gap here, which
I'll tell you. I've heard I've seen some
of the chats out there or people commenting
out there going through withdrawals from the daily
wrap up. It is so incredibly hard for
me to not get there's so many things
rattling around in my brain and for it
to not be have the outlet to be
able to discuss these things drives me crazy.
And so today is going to be a
lot of catch up. For for a lot
of the people out there that aren't kind
of in the moment day to day keeping
track of things, a lot of this still
may be new to you. But a lot
of this for those that are kind of
on that t Lab mindset, it's it'll be
a little bit of catch up for the
last so many days. But I'm gonna give
you my thoughts on some of these things
and why I think a lot of them
are important and some of which we've already
addressed
before it was kind of a big focal
point conversation like the, Sid Tianan
torture camp, which we discussed a few shows
ago as it was first breaking. And I've
been wanting to follow-up on it because it's
just
incredibly disgusting.
It's a shocking story, and it is
incredible how it is even yet still it's
barely permeating through the mainstream conversation. It it's
one of the most disgusting things. It's not
just I mean, some of the things we've
seen happening in Gaza,
the killing of their own people, the the
torturous act
the praising of
murder is just horrible, but this somehow is
grotesque in a a very specific. I guess
it's because it's a deliberate act. It's a
conversation of Israeli soldiers
whether by their own sexual desires or through
just pure torture and just see, which again
is just hard to wrap your mind around
raping men and people in these prisons.
And and and be and it's it's coming
out that it's systemic.
It's it is planned. It's organized.
It's really a really hard conversation, but it's
important that we see what this shows you
about the Zionist
organization that we're talking about and the governments
around the world who are also overlapped with
Zionism but also just blindly supporting what's going
on over there. The United States chief among
them.
But today, we're gonna get into a lot.
I'm gonna start with an interest a shout
out to a recent article from Matt Ehret
that I wanted you guys to see. We're
gonna do a real big focus again
around the Twitter GARM and larger point around
it, the kind of
technocrat manipulation that we're seeing. It's really it's
it's this dangerous move. And it's that's that
doesn't even do it justice because it's for
me, it's really about the 2 party illusion
as always and how this
is yet another example of a long term
agenda. Interestingly enough, that Matt's article doesn't, I
mean, kinda blew my mind today reading. He's
such an amazingly intelligent person and he is
a historian
and adds so much context to these conversations.
His article is about the Olympics and the
occult, kinda paganism.
You know, we've all seen the conversations of
the Last Supper and the way it's he
does such an amazing job, and I'll show
this to him and get started.
But the conversation being this long term
going well, well, well before I mean, go
back to, you know,
8 AD times, like, before I mean, the
point being that it's not just a United
States government conversation. The idea of
pitting 2 groups against each other, you know,
driving people into chaos to take advantage of
that chaos. I also had a really great
interview today with David Knight, which I'm planning
on releasing that with my above phone interview
tomorrow.
And we got into a lot of that.
And you guys are really gonna enjoy this
interview. He's a very intelligent man
at how clear this is with this whole
Twitter,
Elon Musk.
You know, the the overlap of all this,
like, the mainstream alternative media and the Alex
Jones, the Tuckers, and all this stuff. And,
again, the feel and Donald Trump and JD
Vance and all of this kinda materializing in
this really alarming way. And not from the
through the partisan lens that they force you
to look through when you wanna see these
things.
All of them are on the same side.
And that's the bigger point about how all
this is being used. When we get into
the TwitterGarm
manipulation,
I really want you to consider the conversation
of how
classic it is to lead the opposition.
Right? I'll I'll give you the Lennon quote,
talk about the whole thing, of how, historically,
this is a common tactic of
infiltrating and then leading the opposition usually to
the ground. But in this case, leading it
in a direction, like I keep saying, like
the Pied Piper of the technocrats leading the
right end to this this conversation. But what
we're gonna see today in this back and
forth,
at least I want you to consider,
question everything, including what we're talking about, whether
or not both sides, but especially right right
now, is being played by this conversation
and driving you into sort of this this
binary dynamic where you think he's saving free
speech,
but he is essentially acting in the ways
that they were saying that this would end
up in. And be clear on this.
In no way am I calling for censorship
as much as there be there there will
be people that might read that as what
I'm saying. I'm not. I'm still I'm highlighting
a similar problem that you might hear from
that conversation, but I'll also add always that
no matter how powerful, influential, or people have
a right to say what they want, they
have a right to lie to you. That's
the truth. That's free speech if we believe
in actual free speech. And I'll make that
point as well,
that Twitter is not free speech. It's limited
speech. And it's important that if you believe
that this is the way it should be
or that he's saving all of these things,
then just own that, That you believe in
limited speech or you're okay with limited speech.
I everyone has a right to their opinion.
If you're honest about that, I'll just disagree,
but we can have an amicable conversation about
that. But pretending
it's free speech when it's clearly not is
hurting free speech. In fact, you're doing far
more than that. But we're also gonna talk
about the over the ongoing issues with Gaza
and Israel and and many other angles of
that that I wanna make sure we're not
missing.
And just for the opening, I'll leave it
there because it will be a long, long
conversation today. There's a point again about the
UK and overlapping that with Twitter that we'll
get into.
But let's leave it there, and I'll start
with this
very I want you guys to make sure
this is a long article.
And it's it's very heavy. It's very a
lot of information, but it is so incredibly
interesting.
He entitled this Occult Olympic Solar Daities and
the French Pagan Revolution.
Matt Aaron.
This I I mean, I'm not even gonna
try to explain this in just one quick
copy. There's so much information, but the the
few things that really stood out to me
were kinda what I was saying in the
beginning that you can see this going back.
And and what David Knight and I spoke
about today is that the one thing that
stood out in that conversation that drew me
back to this article
was the idea that we're watching this 2
party illusion divide and conquer con
conversation.
And as David and I were highlighting in
this around the Trump and Thiel and Jay
Vance and Tucker and Alex Jones conversation, that
we're being driven into this to cause this
chaos. As we see, clearly coming to a
fever pitch right at the election.
And the conversation was about how the chaos
is created and it's just one angle of
all this to to just like we talked
about with the COVID 19 conversation.
To put you in a position of vulnerability
so you're willing to accept more control over
your life. And this is exactly what I
see playing out. And I made the I
made the point that Matt makes well in
the article that talking about the French civil
war because all of this goes back to
Paris and and all the paganism and the
history of which overlaps with the Olympics. It's
a fascinating conversation. But the idea that the
bloody French revolution, what ultimately
put a stop to that I mean, stop
to the bloody fighting amongst the the population
was Napoleon Bonaparte, a dictator,
framing himself as some sort of god king.
And this is the same kind of idea
is that that was why that was accepted.
Because, ultimately, people were it was chaos and
people accepted that type of control because we
needed somebody to, you know if I saw
this funny meme going around
that Elon was sharing about how it's like
a 4 stage thing where
weak men lead to hard times. There's mold
there's steps in between it, but then, like,
hard men, you know or hard times lead
to, you know, power what's it? Strong men.
Strong men lead to good times, whatever. And
the point is that it's I'm sure there
as David makes the point that, like, the
American Revolution, for example, was a way where
this ultimately
took some positive steps as we highlight there
were people in that room that clearly wanted
what we talk about today.
But the idea that in most cases in
history, that's shockingly re obviously not true. Where
it ultimately hard times led to dictators and
authoritarian control. And, yeah, they sure wrote their
own history as saving the you know, it's
like pretending Winston Churchill is some kind of
amazing figure. He was a terrible person, like,
a lot of people in history that we
pretend are fantastic people. But when you're in
that position, it's really great to make it
seem like those things make sense when you're
pied pipering them right into the new version
of just that. Make sure you read this
because it's really important and mind blowing.
I also wanted to point out a couple
things that are not real we're not gonna
get into for the larger show today. Well,
1, this was just relation to the Olympics.
I thought this was it it is objectively
sad as,
Matheson from
a journalist on the ground in Gaza points
out. Goalkeeper, Mohammed al Sulabi was killed by
an Israel bombing of his house in Khan
Yunus. You know, the safe area. This was
in 7th. And the sad point is that
this person would be
in the Olympics had they not stopped that,
had they not continued to commit this genocide
and the world continued to look away from
it. So an an aside of, you know,
instead of being a
athlete performing at the peak level of athletics,
he's killed because Israel doesn't care and because
you're not your government blinds you to what's
going on. It's very sad.
But also, on another the like I'm not
gonna get into today in regard to medical
freedom in this conversation, I just thought this
was interesting to point out. This and then
2 other things that are old that I
want you to remember.
We've talked about this a lot. In fact,
I should've brought up Robert's article. I forget
the title off the top of my head.
But it's Robert just oh, I think I
know what it is. Hold on.
Yeah. There we go. And this is important.
Robert just talked about this. And the reality
is we've seen that there's disease exploding all
throughout Gaza because it's manufactured. Don't forget Eric
Prince proudly told us that he's the one
that gave them the technology to flood underneath
Gaza despite that being something that we're not
supposed to talk about.
And it's deliberately causing illness.
They praised it. Their own people in their
Knesset have said publicly that this is important.
We can let this happen because it will
help us win.
That's impossible to decouple from what now becomes
making it happen, which is obvious,
verifiable.
Read the article. It's powerful. Israel is deliberately
causing the spread of infectious disease in Gaza.
The numbers are mind blowing.
Mind blowing. Millions of infection. The WHO just
put out a report.
100 of thousands of examples of, like, die
of diarrhea
and scabies. It's just overwhelming.
That's and that's just those are the people
that are alive. How incredible that is. How
shocking.
And that's part of the story we're not
hearing. Well, well, this leads to exactly what
you might expect as I wrote problem reaction
solution. Well, the World Health Organization has announced
that it'll be sending more than 1,000,000 polio
vaccines to Gaza after the virus was detected
in wastewater amid Israel's ongoing onslaught. You know,
this is wild, by the way, and this
is not to argue these things are in
their benefit. I don't believe that.
But Israel, at least the narrative, was they
already started giving these to their people, but
didn't give it to people in Gaza. It
just shows you how ridiculous all this is.
But
for all we know, this is people acting
in what they believe is right. I my
point is I don't trust this for a
second. Based on what just happened, based on
all of this clearly driving in the same
direction, my my
skepticism here stand up on this is everything
we should be skeptical of. Causing the disease
and then treating that with things that we're
already very skeptical of. Let's not forget that
the polio conversation before this was already proven
the supposed outbreaks were literally derived from oral
polio vaccines that Bill Gates and everybody else
pushed forward. I mean, look, I I who
knows what this will come to?
They can make their own choices as people
in God, but as I understand it, they're
very resistant to stuff like this.
But if we start to see something else
happen after this, this where we do not
forget this.
It worries me a lot because these people
are already suffering. I mean and also, let's
not forget. Do you do you know who
this is gonna go through?
Israel.
This will not get to them without first
crossing the hands of the very people who
are trying to murder, starve them to death,
create disease.
Who knows what they're gonna actually get if
this is even something you think is right?
Maybe the one they give them is something
else. I mean, this is incredible that we
act like this in any way makes sense.
But I'll leave it there because it's a
different topic from today. But it's alarming. It's
alarming to see how this stuff works out.
And by the way, let's not forget,
Just a couple of things I saw in
in passing, looking through old arc old links
on
on, my my, you know, bookmarks.
This is from January 22nd 2023. Just want
to remind everybody that peer reviewed science has
now found that a, quote, at a global
level, pre vaccination infection
infection fatality rate may have been as low
as 0.03.07
for between 0 69,
but basically point 7, and
then Forbes under 59, and then point excuse
me, I said it backwards. Point 03 for
159,
point 07 under 69.
In general, all of it being
shockingly less than the flu. And the point
there on top of it was that that
is for 94% of the population falls under
those ages.
It was less than the flu, if even
existed, mind you, and I believe that very
strongly.
The point is that even their own peer
reviewed science that's not challenged is telling you
that they're lying to you, if it was
even there. Maybe that's the point. To trap
you back into assuming that it was there.
Either way, you were lied to. I'm hoping
somebody needed to hear that today. On top
of that, also, I'll include our amazing interview.
Taylor Hudak knocked this out of the park.
Pathologist Arna Burkhart, final interview, revealing the grave
dangers of mRNA vaccines.
Just just the Twitter post alone has a
137,000
views. But still, within some of the higher
hierarchy of the mainstream alternative media that are
pretending they're fighting COVID, this is not even
talked about. Despite the fact that this is
a very important interview that nobody else has.
I'm only saying that not because TLab TLab,
but because this is a powerful and pivotal
discussion around a lot of these things. And
yet, some of them tend to clip things
out and use them for their own views
and not highlight what Taylor did, even give
her credit or TLab. And there's something there
that I want you guys to recognize that
folds over into the conversation of the illusion
of people fighting against the system.
There are people that gained a lot of
clout pretending to fight during COVID 19, seeing
that it was obvious what was happening, that
people were seeing it. The same thing's happening
now.
Doesn't mean you have to blindly ignore every
you know, listen consider everybody's perspectives. Just recognize
that anybody, anybody could be lying to you,
could be playing you, could just be there
because they wanna get reach.
Let me add this so we don't forget
that for the show notes. As always, it'll
all be down below for you guys to
check
out. Now one thing I wanna point out
now this tweet here by the way, I
don't I don't know what this was quite
frankly. I'm thinking this is just one more
level of either glitches or Twitter manipulation.
I'm showing this to show you what people
are saying, but since I'm showing you this
tweet,
I just I posted this because it was
very strange.
People were sharing stuff from TLav, and apparently
it was only for one day,
and it was duplicating everything. And so what
happened was the links would end up merging,
and you got a 404. And you would
you would notice that when you were sharing
it. Just kinda quick share, and it went
out, and you would just kinda look like
it was there, and then was going to
a dead link. Now, that's not why I'm
sharing this, but I can't stop seeing all
these weird, selectively angled,
you know, free speech things on Twitter.
But this is what I wanted to show
you. Same kind of conversation in case you
were wondering why in some cases you just
can't seem to access TLav. It's a this
person says, don't know if it's just me,
but I literally cannot access your website for
a while now.
It says, the site can't provide a secure
connection
despite clearly, verifiably, having an active,
SSL,
having a secure,
dedicated server on HostGator, which is probably gonna
change soon because I want I don't know
who what's behind this and what's going on.
But this is like I'm hearing this. It's
a waterfall. I'm only gonna show you a
few examples. Here's somebody just commenting commenting under
what he said. Same. I can't get on
T Lab on any browser on his phone.
This person's saying they can, but it's intermittent.
Right? I mean, from my perspective, I can
see it on any browser I look at,
even though there's other issues I can identify.
Here's somebody else saying and I just posted
this. I'll come back to this later. The
Beit Selem important human rights group post about
welcome to hell. We're talking about the torture
prisons in Israel.
He says Google is blocking TLAB 2, 3
days now. This is a different thing, by
the way. There's versions of this where it
just goes, whoops, we can't figure it out.
Can't no secure. Sometimes it just says blocked.
And I just talked about that a few
shows ago. Selected by certain areas in the
world like geolocation. There was one of these
search apps somebody showed me. And it literally
says blocked.
I mean, this it's it's and I'm gonna
get into the point about Twitter that somebody
found out showing that Twitter has us completely
tagged. Sixty different tags showing that we are
being blocked, being suppressed, being and that's more
than literally anybody I can see. Because this
was going around if you might have seen
this last couple of days.
I'm sure I'd love to see the other
most censored people in the world who claim
that to compare that, but I'm sure Twitter
is not censoring them. But the point on
this is to show you that there's something
weird going on. Now I asked Ben to
if I could share this and he said
it was okay. We talked about this back
and forth on our DMs.
I sent I sent him a recent article
that I wanted him to share or to
to read. We go back and forth with
a lot of stuff. And he said none
of my browsers are letting me open that
link.
They all say there's errors of some sort.
Now realize how crazy this is. This is
at a time when I'm looking at them
on browser, and we we're using the same
browsers. I can see them. Other people are
sharing it. But then for some reason, on
no matter what browser he looks at it,
can't seem to get it to work. Doesn't
that seem odd to anybody?
And I just said this is getting crazy.
Dedicated server, host gate, or whatever else, these
are things that certainly could be having a
malfunction, but this is continually compounding. You know,
we've gotten 4 lawsuits from weirdly Israel overlapping
groups and all sorts of things happening that
certainly seem to be adding up to a
focused coordinated attack. You can ask yourself why
that makes sense.
But I wanted you to think about that,
that ultimately right now TLab is definitely being
suppressed.
Being blocked being censored. Now why is that?
Right? This is not under some, like, oh,
you're committing a crime, or you're this is
misinformation on a platform. This is that high
level stuff from from
search engines stopping you from seeing what we're
talking about. Now, there's gonna be the claim
out though because you're spreading misinformation. Well, first
of all, you're allowed to under free speech,
but secondly, that's not what's happening. As our
track record is undeniably clear,
we'll talk about all sorts of contentious things.
We'll talk about things that haven't been verified.
Except, you know, is the code this be
possible? Might that be the case? But when
we talk about things we can prove, there
are very few exceptions in the past where
we've made a mistake or said something that
wasn't true
in general, period. And then the ones that
have happened, I will follow-up on and go,
here's why that mistake was made. You won't
find that on damn near any platform, especially
the mainstream alternative media and especially the corporate
media. But yet, here we are being censored.
Now let's talk about the censorship specifically.
And this very, very weird game that's going
on between
GARAM and Twitter.
I talked about this back on July 13th.
Now, of course, this got wildly overshadowed because
this was the day Trump was shot at.
And what's interesting
is that that was this is it happened
live. If you remember I told you this
was as our opening was playing
and somebody tweeted, hey, Trump got shot at.
And oh my god, we jumped with so
we tried to kinda talk about that live
throughout the show.
But the large conversation at the point was
how crazy it was. I said Elon supporters
blatantly ignore Twitter's partnership with Garm. Now this
is before the whole pipe about
suing Garm and Ben Shapiro and talk about
the point was this is at a point
where
they had been talking about how this whole
thing was a problem.
Twitter, Elon, saying how this they remember. They
pulled away from this because of that with
telling us that Garm was part of the
problem.
Then
they repartnered with them on July 1st. And
you guys have hopefully seen this if you're
paying attention at all.
We're excited to announce that X has reinstated
our relationship with the
WFA Marketers Global Alliance For Responsible Media, which
is apparently the World Economic Forum's flagship product.
That's that's exactly what we're talking about. How
does that just end right there? How does
that possibly make sense?
Even if you think there's a reason for
it, if you maybe don't care,
we're talking about a group, you know, particularly
on Twitter, who said, this is the problem.
That's why we're stopping this. And then very
quietly just repartnered with them. Like, that right
there should give you pause. Well, hold on
a second. World Economic Forum supporter, Yacarino, did
this have any effect on why you did
this?
Why didn't why didn't you Elon care? You'll
when this camp people were bombing this under
his tweets. Why what'd you do? This is
a problem. What happened? Nobody said anything about
it. And here's anti censorship going, what terrible
news as evidenced by this monster ratio.
Nobody well, obviously, nobody wants this. Half of
them are trying to pretend like it didn't
happen because no, no, we can't we have
to ignore this because that'll make our whole
agenda look bad. The other half, we're angry
about it because that's contradictory to what we're
saying, or rather the other third. Another third
just didn't even know it was happening.
That's wild to me. Then it progresses into
the conversation of
we're fighting this group. At that point, I'm
going, hold on. Okay. What's happening right now?
So first of all, they repartner with a
group. That's obviously a problem. Obviously, they don't
want you to see you really. They posted
it. Who knows why?
Nobody's addressed it.
And then all of a sudden, Elon's waging
a battle against the group they're partnered with.
And rather, to be very clear, not Elon,
Twitter.
Twitter. X is suing Gar. How does that
make sense?
You guys can think about it for yourselves,
but there's something very fishy going on here.
Now my opinion is that this is about
creating this back and forth, creating the illusion,
the justification, driving you in a direction
to believe you're fighting on one side when,
really, you're fighting one thing or rather, you're
not fighting
with anything. You're there's only one side here
that you're that we're staring at. You're on
one side trying to find out the truth,
and there's not Elon over here fighting against
the bad guy, Garmouth, all the same thing.
It is lead the opposition from within. Now
I'll just show this is the quote. Classic.
And, of course, this is not in any
way supporting Vladimir Lenin. It's just always these
dumb it's just the words that make sense.
The best way to control the opposition is
to lead it ourselves.
And that's something that people like Lenin and
people that historically,
that is this is what's done. This is
what your government does. This is what happened
with things like occupy Wall Street or any
number of groups where the FBI infiltrates and
takes action, drives it to the ground, or
otherwise uses that to their advantage.
We've seen this with a lot of groups
out there. Or, I mean, really, just about
everything.
So thinking about that,
James Lee, who we just had a great
interview with around ADL, I'll show you that
in a minute. He simply says, are we
being gaslit?
Po posting the same
thing. Like, some people seem to ask this
question, how does this make sense?
Now, look, as always, maybe it does. Maybe
there's something that makes this all add up.
But weird how nobody wants to address it,
and anybody you ask, they they act like
you're somehow attacking Elon.
It's like, you know my my opinions about
these people, but this is a simple static
fact. This is a thing that's contradictory. What's
going on? Oh, you're attacking Elon, and that's
very suspicious.
Now,
Jason put out a great clip about this
from one of my recent shows.
You know, break you I recommend you watch
this. It's only 4 minutes. And it goes
over just the the the general part from
the first place, showing you that it's a
very contradictory thing.
And then in this, they show you, like,
there's people posting how it's come that what
they're working on. Like, Garmin, net zero, and
sustainable development goals. Like, there's just no way
you make sense of this if you think
Elon, right wing, free speech, blah blah blah.
Now Tim says keep your friends close and
your enemies closer.
Now you'd forgive me for going that's a
good joke. That's funny because that's what I
would say making fun of q and all
that. Right? I said, I hope this is
a joke making fun of q. Because this
is the argument from before. Donald Trump and,
you know, gotta keep your enemies within or
fight the inside blah blah blah. And then
that clearly did not happen. They turned out
to actually be enemies
because they are. Or rather, they're all your
enemies, pretending to some of them be on
your side. But John Bolton and Pompeo, these
are the swamp guys. And so the argument,
even though you may have wanted to this
is your your way to believe that he
wasn't what he clearly appeared to
be. So you bet on that, but then
clearly, it turned out not to be. And
yet here we are. And it's this is
a real person who's actually saying that. So
it's better to partner with the group that
we're trying to fight because enemies closer or
whatever. Yeah. I don't even know why that
logically makes sense in this context. It's just
a platitude. It doesn't mean anything with what
the when you're partnered with that group, there's
legal overlaps. It's not the same thing.
But they responded going, I just watched it
and I what cue joke? I don't know
what you're saying. I'm like, wow.
That's jet so this is a blind
hope
that this is what what's happening. Ignoring the
contradiction, ignoring the lies, the the the hiding
of this reality, the con the point that
you're partnering with a group that you claim
was hurting everybody,
and that's why you pulled away from them.
But, you know, enemies closer.
Guys, it's a way to make yourself feel
better about what's obviously not making sense and
what you want to believe.
This person says, x just announced a big
lawsuit against Garm. Right? So this is where
it starts happening, where they're going, well, they're
suing them. And this person rightly responds, how
do you sue yourself?
If you're a part of the group, how
exactly are you now that's not you can
certainly sue as a member, but that's not
how this is being addressed. They're not saying
as a member of Garm, we recognize problems
and so we're suing. But that it it
still wouldn't I don't even know if that
would even make sense, quite honestly.
But that's not how it's this is being
framed
as Elon being not a part of this
and going after the bad guy group attacking
conservatives, which is how it's framed by
Ben Shapiro and all the rest of them,
weirdly, not ever appointing out that Twitter was
a partner with them. Whether he's in front
of congress, you know, because they're all playing
the same game.
Now as I understand it, by the way,
the lawsuit itself is pretty toothless.
I've heard this from a lot of people
that are very intelligent around legal the the
the idea of of lawsuits and and, you
know, whether it has any real,
possibility of changing anything.
And as I understand it, one of the
core aspects of this, there's just no way
that they could prove it. But the point
is that, ultimately, I don't think this is
about changing anything. I think it's about convincing
you something changed when everything's actually being cemented.
So he writes after the CEO of Google
of,
Rumble says, Google just found out that they
can't rig the search market to exclude their
competitors anymore.
And by the way, I'm I'm completely in
line with the fact that what they're doing
is censorship or rather leading in a direction
that's trying to suppress and hide and take
action that I think is counter to your
constitutional
rights. But
the argument from a corporate business level
is the idea that these groups are collecting
to take action that they like, this idea
that, like, for instance, it's a company, so
they can take action they want, so it's
not censorship. Well, then it would apply in
the same way in reverse. I don't agree
with that either side of that. I think
your constitutional rights are something that must be
respected, but it's interesting how the argument applies
one way but not the other.
But But he says as soon as the
cabal of advertisers and agencies will find out
that they can't arbitrarily engineer a boycott of
Rumble and x, we've joined x to sue
them. So here, they're claiming that Twitter, who
is currently a partner with this company is
suing that excuse me. With that group is
now suing that group.
Now again, the point is if you're, as
ad groups, gonna boycott these people that you
don't think is right for your advertising agencies,
isn't that their prerogative?
I'm not supporting them. I'm just thinking it's
a and that's the what I'm saying there
is that's why this lawsuit does not seem
to have much merit to it. We'll see
how it goes.
Rumble on the 6th says breaking. Rumble has
joined x to sue the cartel of advertisers
and ad agencies, which of which Twitter is
a part. Twitter is one of those cartel
at one of these groups involved in this
organization.
And I said again at the time, the
only problem is they just partnered with them.
This person says, this is why they are
doing this. And I don't this is I
don't get the I know this answer has
been seeded clearly into the conversation because everyone
keeps saying the same thing.
But so I said, let me try to
understand this. You're saying that Rumble joined Twitter
in suing a group that Twitter is partnered
with, while Elon nor the yak,
Yacarino, have said anything about this incredible contradiction.
How does that even possibly make sense? At
at at best, you're assuming in the direction
of what you hope is the truth.
I find this crazy. And it says they
caved into Garm, which there's no evidence to
suggest that's what happened. That's just their wishful
thinking about what they wanted it to be.
So it wasn't Elon's fault. You see what
I'm saying? Nobody's addressed this, so we don't
know that. Then it says, and Garm continued
its boycott.
So I get the argument would be that
they caved.
So that but then why would you expect
them to change if you caved? The way
that should've been framed is that you joined
with the intention to change from within. But
these are just narratives and you can see
how they don't even make sense in and
of themselves. But now that they make a
reasonable demand, they turn around and sue them.
But it does not hold water. And it
says, so we're just skipping over the extremely
problematic part, which is that Elon and Twitter
chose
to repartner with a group that they just
got done telling us were criminals and then
hid that fact or at least didn't publicize
it, all while acting like you're leading the
fight against
them? How does this that is how the
scam works.
And he simply says, let's see how the
lawsuit pans out. I'm sure
that Musk reserves his rights. I'm sure. Whatever
the assumption is to make you feel better
about what they're doing. But I let's I
agree though. Let's see how this pans out.
And if it ends up where nothing actually
changes,
despite all the narrative I'm sure we've built
about how it changed the world, then we
need to ask whether this was what it
looked like, Which I think it's quite obvious
that it's not.
And this this is and this is the
point I wanted to add just because I
think it's interesting, the response I was highlighting
a second ago. So again, my point was
the only problem is that they repartnered with
this group.
How are we ignoring that fact?
That doesn't seem to be angled in any
aggressive,
opinionated,
simple fact. They're partnered,
they are attack they're going after them, that
doesn't seem to make sense to me. That's
all that says. And he says, yeah, because
Elon's involved in the daily minutia of every
single company he's involved. You always get that
argument. Not what I said. How and how
it says, how about just posting your concerns
without the douchey I don't trust Elon Musk's
slant? How much money have you donated to
save America cost? I mean,
what?
And I said, oh, how childishly clearly, it
irritated me. How childishly easy and embarrassingly self
serving it is to just assume he wasn't
aware. Oh, so he's incompetent.
Great defense. But on that point alone
I mean, I don't know why that the
argument that he's responsible. It's his company.
And even if he's not involved in it,
the point is not about Elon pers in
particular. It's about the fact that Twitter is
joining a group that they are claiming from
even Twitter's side were a problem before that.
But then the idea of saying,
how about just posting your concerns without the
douchey I don't trust you on BART. I
said, I was posting my I was posting
my concerns. Like, I don't understand how that's
not perceived. That's exactly my concern.
I wasn't aware facts could be douchey. Apparently,
just the ones inconvenient to your world view.
Apologize for the crude use of those words.
But it's amazing the response, isn't it?
Inside paper reports in the 6th, Elon Musk
declares war against an advertising advertising industry coalition
and its members, of which x is 1.
So explain for me how Musk can sue
their members in the coalition that he is
a part of the members, and it says
x files federal antitrust suit against GAR. X.
Not Elon, Twitter,
which is the group part of GARM.
It's a may I just don't get how
people aren't making a big deal about this
in the comments. It doesn't logically make sense.
And then he says on 6th, they and
this is in regard to somebody going Financial
Times said, Elon would fail to save Twitter.
Now they're saying that it's the largest and
most influential platform. And he says, a dish
best served cold. I guess revenge or whatever
that's supposed to mean. And I said, or
another way to look at this, and this
is what I want you to consider, is
that the establishment acted like they were against
what was designed to be an important part
of the next operation. And in doing so,
drove all those assuming that if they say
it, do it, the opposite's true, right into
the lion's den. Now certainly that might not
be the case,
but how is it possible that we can't
stand back and ask that question?
Some people, anyway.
It's I mean, there's a a lot of
these are the people that were the most
skeptical about the smallest changes in things during
COVID or anywhere else. But now you've got
a lot of reason to go,
that doesn't really make a lot of sense,
and we stand back and at least consider
that this is a
engineered concept or engineered direction.
Right? Clearly they said Elon's gonna fail, we
have to step in and support Elon because
if they say he's bad, then he must
be good. This cannot be where we're thinking.
Certainly could be. But now I'm thinking that
we're if they drove you into the position
to be in the thing that they said
would end up being the problem, and then
you've got Elon driving this thing in the
direction that they said he would, maybe you
ask whether that that he's the
driver of the bus of the agenda to
make you end up being what they're claiming
you are, even though you're not that right
now. Then they can turn around and take
action in the same way. That's only one
small part of all the way this ends
up. Or he's just not aware he's doing
it. It's all going in the same direction.
Now the CEO of Rumble says the World
Federation of Advertisers is shutting down GARM
after Rumble, Rumble, and X filed suit against
them. What are they hiding?
Now, I haven't been able to confirm if
that's actually what's happening.
Right? The shutting them down.
But either way, let's think about this for
a second. This is exact this almost makes
my point, and not in approvable way. It's
all just because the point is it's all
unverifiable.
But if the whole thing was meant to
make it look like this was a big
war, even though he was part he was
on their team, and all of a sudden
they shut it down after this
kind of floating of a lawsuit that most
people tell me really had no teeth? Doesn't
that seem a little bit too easy, too
convenient? Now suddenly, we won. It's over. And
is the partnership still there? Is the group
behind the scenes still there? Just because the
front front facing
the face of it seems like you know,
again, just think about how this is
seemingly
a little bit too easy.
And I just said, guys, for f f
f f f s, how can you not
see that you're being played? They repartnered with
Garm on the first, yet somehow both Elon
and Twitter are fighting Garm. This is a
special kind of willful ignorance but, you know,
I just don't think people wanna see it.
Now,
of course, Bad Kitty Unleashed and a lot
of people that just are, you know, all
about this we're winning mindset. Who cares if
there's parts that contradict what we thought before?
He says, maybe look under my account for
a few things. I'm certain there's tons more.
Essentially, Elon would eventually find out that GARMA
is linked to the Biden administration.
Oh, okay. So if there's any tangential link
to the Biden administration that means they're bad.
But if Elon partners with them, well, there's
a reason that makes sense so just shut
up about it. Yeah, that's really objective, isn't
it? Through its relationship with Publix and news
guards. Okay, so again, a tangential connection. All
every one of these groups are problematic and
and and terrible for free speech.
And I'm not gonna say for a second
that Biden and everybody else involved including Trump
and Elon, everybody else are not involved in
this, but it's amazing to me that this
is the point. And yet, we'll comment down
below going, look, they're partnered with this group
and just get one like and nobody comment
probably because it's being suppressed anyway.
But he says I'm he says, I'm the
one who broke that they were World Economic
Forum in November. Again, that's the point. That's
who they're partnered with right now. Google, he
says, is involved in NewsGuard and Publix or
I'm sorry, Publix Publix or how would you
pronounce that? Publixix?
Public
is? And it says, and Google started most
global censorship and is directly linked to Obama.
It's all the right left paradigm.
Right? It's only those bad guy lefties, the
right. They're all there to save you and
do all the good things. You know, just
ignore history though because that won't out that
won't line up.
Just so incredible to me. Now here's what
Lelandia Yaccarino had to say on 6th.
Hey, everybody.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the house judiciary committee
that a group of companies
organized a systematic
illegal boycott
against x.
That they partnered with. It is just
wrong,
and that is why we are taking action.
Today,
we filed an antitrust lawsuit
against the Global Alliance For Responsible Media, 4
of its key members, and the World Federation
of Advertisers.
These organizations
targeted our company and you, our users.
The evidence and facts
are on our side.
They conspire to boycott x, which threatens our
ability to thrive in the future.
That So she's mad that they chose to
try to moderate what they're doing.
Remember that. What's your global town square The
one place that you can express yourself freely
and openly
at long term risk. Obviously, that's not the
reality. There's plenty of people that I will
get into are still being censored and people
that are suppressed and shadow banned as she
clearly promoted, and I'll play that next.
Right? But is this the global town square?
Isn't that one thing that a lot of
us in the in the liberty minded community
were telling you not to fall into that
trap, that we should not allow that to
be the reality?
But ultimately, this is how it works. So
if you're let's just even say you were
kinda skeptical of that, but you're still but
you believe Elon's fighting for free speech and
Twitter's the best out there so we should
get all of a sudden you're going, well,
we we need to fight this, we need
to fight this. And inadvertently
cementing in the reality that this is the
town the town's global town square and that's
how it's gonna.
You're being played, guys. I really hope people
can see that.
People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted.
No state of people should be able to
monopolize
what gets monetized.
Interesting.
Despite the fact that she works with groups
just like that, comes from the background of
groups that are screaming about that and has
said that's what she wants many times.
This group is no match for the power
of our users, all of you. See, she's
acting like you're doing this. This is but
very weird.
The she's trying to, you know, emotionally draw
you into this thinking that you are the
one fighting this. The very same users
that have driven usage of X to all
time highs.
I joined X because I believe in the
power
of the global town square.
It's users like you, people of all backgrounds
and opinions,
who make x
indispensable.
You deserve Of course, unless you are, you
know, angry that Israel's committed genocide or any
number of other things, but those are not
everything else, though, until something new tomorrow. An
open platform
where your views can be expressed without restriction
and without fear.
That's an utterly false. She was the one
that championed, as I'll play in a second,
the lawful but awful.
They no shares, no reach. That's that's not
no restriction. Like, how do we not see
how wildly dishonest this is?
To all of you who have been part
of this transformative
journey that we're on,
thank you.
Rest assured My god. X has never been
more committed to innovating and expanding
all of our global town square.
Check this out. I didn't notice this until
just now.
Can you see what she's wearing on her
necklace?
It literally says free speech. My god.
I mean, come on, guy. This is ridiculous.
I mean, this is such a game to
these people. And your patriot voice points out,
Garm works hand in hand with the ADL.
And, you know, by the way, so does
Twitter. Yackerino has partnered with these groups before
this.
That's why we're clearly watching them suppress and
censor pro Palestinian content. But it says, why
is x not taking action against the ADL
like Elon Musk said he would? Gee, I
wonder why.
Instead, they're partnering with Garmin groups that partner
with ADL.
But here is a great clip put up
by Casey Wright
showing you Linda Yaccarino versus
Linda
yaccarino.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by
the House Judiciary Committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
Of an open feedback loop
for the advertising experts in this room
to help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,
ad
safety, content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what the influence is.
That puts your global town square, the one
place that you can express yourself freely and
openly.
We have built
content moderation tools
that have never existed before at this company.
If you're gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled at long term risk.
People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted.
And we've introduced a new policy called
freedom of speech,
not reach.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
or gets monetized.
But more importantly,
if you're gonna post something
that is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled,
you get de amplified,
which means it cannot be shared,
and it is certainly
demonetized.
No small group of people should be able
to monopolize
what gets monetized.
It is certainly demonetized.
Well, look at that.
I mean, let's be clear about this, guys.
That is exactly what she's saying.
You know, just like look. There's a a
a higher up little group of people. But
if we're just in the Twitter ecosphere,
they represent that little group of people. They're
the ones in their little group deciding what
is and is not monetized. Isn't that literally
what she just said? We're talking about Linda
Yaccarino, a very high influential,
what is she? What was she before this
now? But, anyway, overlap with the World Economic
Forum. This is not some little independent fighting
insider. This is clearly
exactly what she's talking about. They're just trying
to frame themselves as the kind of outside
the the group fighters. That's not what's happening.
Isn't it weird that every time we have
this, like, a new rise of somebody fighting
the power, that they always seem to come
just from inside the power? Weird. Are they
just there's so many people who are outside
of it all, who've been fighting their whole
lives, who never get that kind of attention,
but weird how we always lean in to
the one who who, you know, was the
who was in it. He was a part
of it, but now I see the truth.
And maybe we love to believe in the
change kind of concept like that, but how
often has that worked out? We're being played.
Or being played.
Great clip, Casey. I think that's important.
Now Elon shared this today.
Usage of this platform reached another all time
high.
Well, look. I think I mean, that's not
something even to be debated. I mean, obviously,
like, this is the point, I think, who
did I talk about this with? Maybe I
think it was, James Lee actually, on the
ADL discussion I'll show you in a minute.
Where obviously,
of all of the main platforms, I think
Twitter has the most amount in regard to
just what you can say at the moment
for some for most people. But there's plenty
of other platforms that just don't have the
reach that are complete free speech. Plenty of
them.
Right and left for that matter or just
not anything.
But that's to say that there there's a
reason, in my opinion, that's happening. You kind
of partially open the gates.
Right? So some people are like you know,
and, of course, the people that benefit from
it who blindly ignore that other side of
people are being censored. It's just this is
the flip flop of what it was before
in a different way. And frankly, it's a
lot more about social engineering,
machine learning, manipulation using your data. And so
the point is they kinda want the stuff
to be out there. But either way,
as Kevin Sorbo writes,
seems people like free speech.
And this is my point from before.
I said limited speech, Kevin.
Limited speech.
That's what the this platform supports.
And conflating
that with actual free speech as you're all
doing, you're hurting free speech.
But I know that's not as fun as
the fantasy you're all projecting.
Now this brings us into the point about
censorship in very, very real ways on this
platform.
1st,
this is just one example. I could've pulled
up countless examples as you're all well aware.
This is Nadria Ali saying, x deletes my
content. I've had this happen to me before.
The tweet's up, but the actual video gets
deleted.
It says, if you see this post, just
comment
or even a dot. It says, let me
see all pro Palestinian here. The point is
that they are centering content,
guys. Not under the guys that were somehow
violating things, just getting deleted, getting accounts removed.
Suppressing is the main point.
Downgrading everything. Demonetizing.
This is exactly
it's a multi tiered agenda, and it is
everywhere.
But you may have seen this circulating.
This is something I was actually pretty blown
away by. So APAC tracker posted this. Well,
first of all, posted theirs.
Here's how X is censoring us. Now, this
was kind of beginning to go viral at
this point. Somebody figured out I I actually
have the breakdown from,
Kim Iverson did it to her accounts, and
she shared the person that was kinda breaking
down how this was going on. I'll show
you in a second. But they basically figured
out that you could take some some snippet
of information from your account, put it into
Grok, and Grok would pump out as it
says I'll just read what it says. It
says based on the provided code snippet and
the account analysis,
specifically at trackapac,
is labeled with the following labels from the
open source Twitter recommendation algorithm.
And there were 15 of them.
Abusive,
compromised, engaged spammer, blah blah blah. All of
these amount to some level of suppression,
which is crazy.
So I reached out, and I said, that's
crazy, man. Is there any way you could
do that for me? And he did. And
he says, so could someone sue x for
false advert oh, this is actually still theirs.
For isn't it this isn't free speech. I
completely agree with that. But then, he did
mine.
I said, take a look at this. Or
just the same thing. Just this is what
they did for me. So thank you for
that first. And he said, check out how
many censorship flags
TLAF has.
60.
Four pages.
I've seen this been going this has been
going around last couple of days. I have
not seen a single person out there with
this many on there, which probably won't surprise
any of you. But all these other claims
are the most censored man in the world.
I'd love to see that comparison. I'm sure
there's pretty few of them and you know
who I'm talking about. The point
is that all of this is on there
from Twitter.
Abusive. This label is applied when the account
is abusive?
How do you even make sense of that
in any way?
Now, yes, I can give it back when
people are being crude or crude or whatever
else, but you will never see me just
go after somebody for no reason. I guess
the the maybe the worst you could argue
is around the
people that are posting false information around Israel
with Gaza. Like Elon Levy, for example. Well,
I'll just make a comment to that calling
him what he is. But if you're gonna
pretend that that's abusive when what we see
going on and there are people in the
left right paradigm or foreign policy that are
daily doing this. Peoples, in particular, Zionist right
now.
That's and point is
that's just one of them that suppresses this.
Abusive high recall. This label's applied when the
account is abusive with high recall, which I
guess means maybe
influence or reach. I'm not sure. But it
says this label is applied when the account
is a top user
identified by spam detection. Oh, so now I'm
spamming the platform. That's Agatha spam dot top
user. Birdwatch disabled. This label is applied when
the account is disabled for birdwatch. I don't
even know what that means.
Blink bad. This label's applied when the account
is considered bad by blink.
All these different things so how are we
talking about over here, this bad group collecting
to make all these decisions and suppress? What
do you think this is?
Compromised.
This label is applied when the account is
compromised?
See, guys, I'm just getting arbitrarily
tacked on labels that continue to there's just
one more added today, just because we said
the wrong thing here. Give them one more
label. Compromise. What does that even mean? How
is it possible to compromise? Wouldn't that mean
that they would do something about that? Take
the account down? No. These are just arbitrarily
labeled, in my opinion, to suppress your work.
Do not amplify. This label's applied when the
account should not be amplified. That's what Yackarina
was talking about. We're being suppressed. Gee, like
we didn't know that. Posting things and getting
the most and very clearly by by topic
as well. You'll see some of these things
get certain reach and some that just get,
like, one one like. You know, I mean,
it's clear that there is enough people to
follow this account where that's just not the
case.
They're they're just not seeing it. And this
is not unique to me. This is this
was going around until they decided to put
a stop to it. And I'll show you
that next.
Look. The label when the account has duplicate
content,
in what way? The this label is applied
when the account is an engaged spammer. This
label's applied when the account is engaged spammer
with high recall. This label's applied when the
account is experimental PMF user 1. What the
hell does that mean?
But there's some of these that are really
interesting.
Look at this. I got all of these.
Experimental PMF user 3, user 4.
I mean, then our next one, experimental s
e h one. They I don't even know
what these things mean. The labels apply when
the account is experimental s e h user
1. I don't I I want you to
bet if you find out what that means
that it's some arbitrary thing that has in
no way applies to any account like this.
This is just a way to suppress what
we're doing. And ask yourself why TLAB has
more than everybody else we're seeing right now.
Yeah. I think you know why. Objective, nonpartisan.
Gore and violence?
Look at this. This label's applied when the
account is associated with high precision gore and
violence content.
My god.
This label's applied when the account is experimental
health user 1. Who knows?
I'll just cup make sure you read these.
I'm gonna show you a couple that stand
out. Actually, I haven't looked at all these,
not graduated. These labels apply when the account
is not graduated.
What, like, underage?
What the hell does this stuff mean?
Look at this. This label's applied when the
content has not safe for work banner image,
like like pornography.
My god.
This label's applied when the account is read
only. Look at that.
See what I'm saying? Like, this this these
are things that aren't even meant to be,
like, you're doing bad things. They're just, like,
blatantly suppressive, whatever, I think, would apply, I
think.
So this was the one. Look at this.
State media accounts. It's exactly what I'm saying.
These labels apply when the account is a
state media account.
So I I mean, I guess the way
I would try to read that is like
they're trying to suggest that I'm, like, being
like this is an Iranian or Russian account
or something.
Or they're saying that I'm a state media
account, they don't give me a badge for
it, so screw that. The point is that
this is all suppressive. All of it.
Unbelievable.
Yes. The the state media account. Anyway, that
the unconfirmed email sign up, these labels apply
when the account has an unconfirmed email sign
up. How exactly are you gonna make that
make sense when I've got the the check
and I engage with like, the point is
that would mean that I haven't even finished
my sign up process.
This is just straight up censorship, guys.
Period.
And I added to that
that the what,
gen x girl showed me. I said, so
apparently and this has been I'll show you
the next ones too. And this has been
confirmed 14 times over by people that are
been watching this. People that are, you know,
coders and so on. It says, so apparently
after many people started taking advantage of this,
and it was a lot. And for a
minute there, it was all over Twitter.
They updated Grok.
To I'm sure it was just a normal
scheduled update, so we can no longer see
the labels.
Oops.
Now the Elon fanboys will pretend that this
never actually happened. Free speech, guys. Woo hoo.
X updated Grox, so now you and she
shows you show the breakdown, that you cannot
run the algorithm check on your account anymore.
Does that sound like a
What that shows you is that this was
something people saw, they didn't want you to
see it, so they took it down. That's
how I read that, but you can decide
for yourselves.
Kim showed hers, let me re tweet that
real quick.
Since it's important for people to see, that
I don't think a lot of people paid
attention to, or just probably got suppressed.
The Twitter account Kim Iverson is labeled with
the following categories. Look. She has 6 of
them 5 of them. 5.
TLAP has 60. But look, it's the same
point. Abuse if I recall, engagement spam, NSF.
It's the same stuff that doesn't even remotely
apply to what she's doing.
These labels suggest the account has been identified
by Twitter's algorithm as potentially engaging in abusive
behavior.
Right? And and this means that the algorithm
has a higher confidence in these labels being
accurate for this specific account.
That's just that's just wild.
And then she says, here's how to find
out.
And this person's pointing it out. What the
f, Elon? Of course, they're not engaging with
these guys. They're just pretending like it's not
happening. Who just doesn't doesn't wanna see it.
Same old games. You just type in to
grok and he breaks down how to do
it. Analyze the content for handling you guys.
Others so included if you wanna do it
for yourselves. My point is, it's not happening
anymore. They've suppressed this so it's no longer
able able to be done.
And just on that note itself, just I'm
it just I really hope people can reflect
on how incredibly obvious that is. That obviously
we're being censored and suppressed and categorized and
and labeled.
And here they are acting like we're waging
some battle against the groups who are labeling
and censoring and and, y'know, select groups who
are deciding who can be monetized. You're literally
describing Twitter.
I don't believe this is honest. I believe
this is some kind of a game to
convince you that you're on the side fighting
all the bad things. That's what I believe.
And I don't know why that's that hard
to wrap your mind around seeing as how
every other angle of damn near every other
psyop that we've discussed is completely intertwined with
what these people are doing, with what Elon
is behind, with who they're working with.
Here is doctor Anastasia Marril Maria Lupus who
did a poll.
Now who knows what I I I I
think she well, actually, no. I I believe
she's been pretty critical of Elon over the
years over the the or since buying Twitter.
But, you know, very clearly, at least at
first, was sort of, like, leaning into it
as I saw, but good on her for
calling it out because she has. She's been
pretty open about calling him out for censorship
and suppression and so on. But she did
a little,
poll.
Elon Musk is deep state, question mark.
72%
out of 20,000
votes said yes.
That's not nothing, guys. That's pretty impactful.
And and by the way, the overlap specifically
with with the worksheet that a lot of
people on that conversation are supporting Elon. And
this is from her following
72.4%
out of 20,000
said Elon Musk is deep state. Now you
you can decide whether deep state's the right
way to frame it, but just simply that
he's not on your side.
I don't know. It's I hope people are
starting to take notice of this.
Now we just recently talked on 4th
about US Israeli 5th generation warfare.
Israeli bots destabilizing propaganda and digital regime change.
Now I'm gonna include this today actually because
I forgot to put this in the show
notes last time. And we've talked about this
in the past. James Corbett did an amazing
breakdown about this topic on April 18, 2023.
Your guide to 5th generation warfare. It's an
important conversation to make sure you check this
out. Because this is what we're living through
right now, in my opinion.
And I talked about Twitter in particular, talked
about this discussion. But I wanted to, just
one more time,
get into the point about the bots, because
that's a whole other another angle to this.
So,
Brock
did a great breakdown from that show.
We are being game, deep fakes AI in
5th generation warfare. So you can check out
just that section if you'd like. I've included
that.
Censored man is the one that did this
really great thread.
We've talked about this already. But the Israeli
bot problem. Now this is as if you
understand this and break down the different, you
know, points he's made, he's done all these
posted this a lot over the last, you
know, I don't know, months or or couple
months where he was the one that really
pointed out the aut Authentics discussion. Now both
of these things are still happening. Israeli bots,
because of the CHEQ company he hired to
stop the bots, an Israeli company has only
flooded this platform with bots. I think it's
by design.
But the Authentix verification company, which is an
Israeli intelligence group,
unit 8200 overlapped and clearly is involved with
a large portion of Israeli intelligence in their
country, that's what's still being used to verify
for Twitter right now. I just talked about
this.
I I did I it was because of
the troll thing that was pretending to be
TLAB and I went to go report it,
and it went to that domain and said,
you have to click the box that says
you're okay with Authentix taking your biometric data
even though Twitter doesn't need it.
All of this is still happening, and those
are other parts of this that show you
very clearly this is not about free speech.
But here,
Israeli minister of this Diaspora Affairs in June.
The in June, The Times released an article
revealing that the Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs
set up a campaign using 100 of Israeli
bots posing Israel Americans. These bots posted
pro Israel content across various social media platforms,
including Twitter, primarily targeting black democratic lawmakers urging
them to continue funding Israel's war on Gaza.
What this shows
is that the Israeli government is directly involved
in botting x, and we all know that.
They've admitted this before and creating fake profiles
in order to shape pro Israel narratives.
This is just one instance of this discussion.
He says, but believe me, there are 1,000.
Israeli reportedly use fake social media accounts to
garner support.
He says, so who's battling these bots?
What would be
former Israeli intelligence officer guy oh, that would
be former intelligence officer guy
Tutunovich.
And how did Elon find this guy to
battle bots? Well, that's because Netanyahu himself
asked Elon
to have a meeting, and he discussed all
of this, including misinformation, bots, and antisemitism.
So, yes, Israel supplies the bots and Israel
pretends to battle them. This is the company,
Israel CHEQ, to help Musk battle bots on
x. Has anybody noticed anything change?
We all see the problem.
Fake bots
bombarding your DMs or, I guess, only certain
people. You know? And there's all these weird
people pretending to be Elon. We still we
talk about, like, the Bitcoin thing,
but there's also people reaching out on Twitter.
Like, hey. I'm e this is Elon's group
or Elon himself. You need to help me
with this. People are falling for this stuff,
especially people that are less discerning.
But he found this
by looking at the likes.
It was very clear that the likes he
basically quickly was, sum it up, is that
he noticed that there was a formulaic pattern
to the way that they would collectively like
things and you would see like 30 views
but a 100 likes. And it was very
so very clearly he recognized Censored Man through
that, a pattern that may help them identify
the bots. And then, almost like clockwork, the
day after he posted that,
they changed the whole platform to stop showing
likes.
And as he pointed out,
at first, it was actually optional. You already
could do that. If you wanted your likes
to be hidden, well, that was already the
case. 2023, you can now hide your likes.
But I recommend keeping them open. And then
all of a sudden, he just decided to
make them all private. Weirdly, a day after
it got discovered that that allows you to
see the Israeli bot program.
How you you start to get the picture?
Hopefully.
Now realize the BBC and plenty of others
have already talked about this. This 2,013,
government pays students to fight Internet battles. That's
Israel.
Here is a great breakdown from Al Jazeera.
Are you chatting with pro Israel AI powered
super bots? Smart bots have emerged as an
unexpected weapon in Israel's war on Gaza. Lebanese
researchers, Ralph Beydoun and Michael Seaman,
from research and strategic communications consulting firm, Influencers,
decided to monitor how what seemed like Israeli
bots have behaved
on social media since October 7th. He says
early on, pro Palestinian accounts dominated the social
media space, which as what as Greenblatt admitted
was the point. We're having a generation problem,
not a left right problem as much as
they really wanted you to think that just
like with covid.
But all of a sudden,
it exploded
with a surge in pro Israel comments underneath
that pro Palestinian content.
The idea, he says, is that if a
pro Palestinian activist posts something within 5, 10,
20 minutes, a significant amount of comments on
their post are now pro Israel.
This is almost every tweet is essentially bombarded
with swarm and swarmed by many accounts, all
of whom follow very similar patterns. All of
whom seem almost human, but guess what? They're
not. They're actually bots.
And it it goes to make it makes
a bunch of points in this about what
constitutes a super bot. It's this overlap with
artificial intelligence, and it's it's what's overtaking these
platforms. By By the end of 2023 and
this is actually make sure you hear this
part. We've heard this floated before, but it's
really important. And there's a link to this
data.
Nearly half, at the end of 2023,
nearly half of all Internet traffic
were bots.
Found a sta this was found by a
study by the United States security cyber fur
cybersecurity firm,
Imperva.
Bad bots
reached their highest levels recorded,
making 34%
of the traffic of all of the Internet.
Think about how crazy that is. Now bad
bots meaning, like, the kind of things we're
talking about. And then they overlap that with
the good bots, which in some cases, there
are just kinda formulaic bots that serve purposes
for, you know, little functions. And they call
that and they rem they amount to 15%.
I just question whether any of these are
good or whether we should question that. But
even 34%,
34% of the entire Internet? How much do
you wanna bet 30% of that's on Twitter?
I'm kinda kidding. Kind of. But it says,
according to Beydoun, the pro Israel bots, they
found mainly aimed to sow doubt
and confusion
about the pro Palestinian views as opposed to
simply trying to make you trust them to
believe them in future discussions. So this is
a desperate, reactive thing. Just downplaying and hiding,
confusing you about what is clearly happening.
It says, quote, the ability of AI to
create these larger botnetworks
has a massively
deleterious
effect on truthful communication,
but also freedom of expression because they have
the ability to drown out human voices. So
think about this. This is a whole another
angle.
Not using those bot well, that's part of
it, using those bots to flag you and
get you actually censored, but just the simple
presence of that many bots, like on Twitter,
actually suppress your speech because they just drown
out all the human voices in very selective
and categorized ways.
So that's important to think about. Another angle
for the person supposedly saving free speech, allowing
the very thing that specifically
hurts your freedom of speech. Your freedom of
expression, your ability to communicate,
just simply frustrates you because we can see
how arbitrary or rather artificial this all
is. Very important to think about.
Now I'll include this as well. The art
of deception, how Israel uses Hasbara to whitewash
its crimes. It's important to understand this. This
is not some kind of conspiracy topic as
much as a lot of these things are
kind of disregarded as, like, anti semitic. Hasbara
as a public and very clearly verifiable prog,
you know, practice. It's the name for what
they call their their propaganda platform. And this
this is a public conversation.
What they do is essentially
it's like a systematic way of using people
like we just showed you on the Internet
or on wherever else. It's in real life
too. But on the Internet
talking about and going on there and trying
to change the conversation. And and and and
specifically through Hasbarra in very deceptive ways.
It's not secret, guys. And read it for
yourself and you'll see it's very clear. Now,
I just wanna play this for you on
this segment part. It's crazy to me. This
is from 7 years ago.
It's haratz.com.
Israel's
new Hasbara app.
That's perfect. Now it's framed in a very
positive way, but this is about, hey. Download
the app. Let's it says here, to recruit
recruit you and arm your phone. Yeah. Join
the war. That's how this is framed, to
fight the bad things. And in most cases,
you can show that the narratives are simply
being suppressed that they find inconvenient to Israel.
In no way are they wrong or incorrect.
Want to defend Israel? You've been using US
propaganda?
Say that you we we need you to
fight for Israel.
That's pretty interesting.
Want to defend Israel?
Log on to 4 I l. Download the
app, and share the truth.
20 with DBDS, of course. Again, so these
are things that you have a constitutional right
to participate in that they're suppressing.
You know the truth about Israel? I know
the truth about Israel. It makes you angry
and helpless.
See. So simply put even framing this now
this is sort of a critique in a
way of it. It's a raz, but there's
in a way, it's the the background is
still not, like, as really dark as this
can be.
$36,200,000
budget devoted to fight
delegitimization
of Israel.
See now, you may think that in and
of itself is bad. But what if they
should be delegitimized?
What if the reality is what you're showing
is that they've committed a crime? Here's how
you can prove this is an illegal occupation.
Right? Well, then they're gonna fight it because
that's not what they want you to see.
But it's true.
And that's the crux of this whole thing.
Is that most of this is fighting
uncomfortable realities that Israel doesn't want you to
see.
For the podcast, it says, so with all
these new soldiers in the front on on
the social media front lines,
you have to ask yourself, who's authentic and
who's the troll?
Right?
7 years ago,
It's Peretz. Peretz is writing the or making
the video.
Think about that. 7 years ago? Can you
only imagine what's going on now? And they're
working with Elon and Twitter.
Pretty damn obvious.
Now let's talk about
the overlap of this. The conversation with this
going on in the UK, so like a
real world overlap
to something that is, you know, and and,
like and let's just start with this conversation
because there's a again, as always with these
and especially with the partisan angle, there's a
lot of assumption.
Now all I'm trying to highlight with what's
going on here is that there is a
there's pea people are being gamed.
In no way is that suggesting that there's
not an obvious issue with what's going on
with immigration, which is by the whole point.
Just by saying that you're being manipulated is
not to say that those are fake people
or something. There's very clearly
a a a problem happening, and that's being
driven
by people like the Zionist entities in in
Israel. This is not a racist comment. It's
easily verifiable.
Now, obviously, within that, there's gonna be people
that are committing crimes, and they should be
dealt with. But to argue that everybody there,
every including the one they're acting surreptitiously
as pretending to be something they're not, to
create the view that we're seeing today from
a lot of the right wing conversation,
We just need to at point, we need
to recognize that there is a manipulation within
that. It's just like with Venezuela and the
caravan and the way that we pretended
that Bolton and I mean, everybody, Elliot Abrams,
didn't openly admit that their actions caused that.
And then we act like it's so and
then my point is through that, through actions
with Israel and others, this was a weaponized
and weaponized migration.
Now the point is that no one is
suggesting
that we should not be calling out the
problems, the the racism, including towards white people,
or the other way around. Those things exist.
All that's to say that within that conversation,
we are being manipulated.
This is being driven by people like Tommy
Robinson and others to very clearly
at be behest of a Zionist
agenda.
This is I mean, if this has been
wildly shown. Now this is to talk about
the overlap of how this is working and
being driven from Twitter and Elon Musk in
particular.
Liz Churchill, clearly on the Elon side, says
not only is the UK asking to extradite
Elon Musk for meme crimes, which I don't
know. Is that even I don't even know
if that's true. I didn't see that anywhere
but certainly possible, there's a lot of ridiculous
things happening today. But what I can see
is the the discussion around Twitter.
So my my point being that for all
this this is the kind of stuff that
gets floated that probably comes from some conversation.
But, you know, look it up for yourself.
If you find that, let me know in
the chat. I wasn't able to find any
discussion about
asking Elon to be extradited, which I don't
even know how that possibly makes sense. He's
he's a South African. He's living in the
United States, I think. The idea that you're
gonna be extradited. That's the I don't know.
This thing makes sense, but who knows? But
the point is about the idea of the
UK
because of a lot lot of what's going
on
censoring your speech.
And, of course, everybody should call that out.
But then you got the Elon side of
this acting like this is what's happening. The
other side is doing this. And, yes, that's
the truth.
But we just went over how that's not
really the side that he's on. And I
think the problem is is this is we're
being set up in this binary way using
things that are being manufactured.
But using real people, by the way. That's
the problem is that a lot of these
people are just people being used and ends
up being the focal point of the hatred.
And if you're doing that, you're the one
being manipulated.
But it says they're now telling people that
they'll be prosecuted if they share any information
on the current UK riots.
This is something we should be very concerned
about. Now what this is the way this
works.
You drive this problem, in a large way,
from Twitter as well, which they all have
the right to do, that's free speech, but
they drive this into reality, right, and then
they allow them to crack down on this,
they allow them to make these kind of
it's a self serving problem, self fulfilling prophecy.
So now they're in in no way legally,
in my opinion, shutting down people's ability to
say or share things online. Which is what
they've been trying to do. And by the
way, which Twitter in many ways is doing
on their own platform.
Right? So this is all part of the
same game. And and the World Economic Forum,
which they're partnered with right now through GARM,
has been screaming about this. And I'll I'll
make this point even further as we go
along. But listen to what they're doing in
the UK, this is a problem and we
should be very worried about how this is
happening both in the UK and the United
States.
Matthew Thompson now,
to talk through this. So Matthew,
the last point there is crucial, isn't it?
Some people might be sharing simply
to warn their friends, but it could be
considered an offense because they're amplifying this. Absolutely.
And that's the key message is that however
you, you know, think you're acting innocently on
social media, whatever platform it is, you're just
sharing something for whatever reason that could potentially
be a criminal offense. And and look, it's
not an idle threat either because,
the Crown Prosecution Service were keen to point
out that they've made a number of charges
in relation to stirring up of racial hatred
online. One of which this morning was for
distributing a recording
that could
in intending to stir up racial hatred. And
so they are actually already bringing charges in
relation to this sort of thing. So it's
a very, very clear
message based in the harsh reality if you
like. That if you do this kind of
thing, you are potentially committing a criminal offense.
There he said it. They've got teams of
people scouring the Internet looking for this sort
of thing. And if you are in the
business of sharing
or retweeting whatever platform it might be, potentially
criminal material, well, then you could find yourself
prosecuted.
Guys, there is literally no way that anybody
could I mean, nobody should support this. This
is such an obvious overreach no matter where
you are in the world. The idea that
by simply sharing something, like, not even being
behind the even just first first point is
if you put something online that they argue
is somehow hate speech or whatever else, that's
protected under free speech, at the very least
in the United States. Right? The point though
is that we still there's a lot of
similar overlaps to what they point out in
the UK as well. But then to argue
that by simply as they even point out
that you're going, hey. Look at this. How
about if you're going, hey. Look at how
gross this is. This is what we need
to try and stop. Uh-oh. You can't even
point at it.
There's just no way anybody could pretend like
that is in anybody's interest but the government,
about controlling because it'll it'll overlap to other
things that next time you may not support.
So my point is I guarantee there are
people out there that think that's good. Stop
them from saying that because I disagree with
that. You know, just like the right in
many ways has done the same thing recently
by good. Fire them because, you know, cancel
that person. We don't like what they're saying.
They accused Trump. They wanted Trump to get
shot. It's the point is all the paradigm
does this. You rationalize what you agree with
and act like it's okay because it's the
right thing. It's very childish.
The point here is that this is so
this is an the Orwellian Step
sprint in this direction, and we need to
be very aware of where this is going.
I'm pointing out, at at least in my
opinion, that we're the the back and forth
of this between the Twitter angle and really
just the United States and the right now
at the right, this point pointing this out,
I believe that this is driving a very
clear agenda. I very clearly. And, look, we
have we've already seen how this is like,
the same thing with, like, the Venezuela conversation.
It's it's very prominent how Elon and this
whole thing has played a very clear role
in how these things are going.
And, again, he has a right to say
what he wants. That's not what I'm calling
out the fact that he shouldn't be or
rather that he should be censored for. That's
not what I'm saying. But it's obvious that
this is a much
higher level agenda than I think most people
are re are choosing to recognize.
Because, you know, we it's like you know
what it is? It's like we're set up
to think that by pointing these things out,
somehow you're on the left or you're fighting
free speech, and it's just this binary game
that's played.
Obviously, you can point things out that are,
that are reality without being pinned to one
narrative or side or the other. But that's
how they do this.
Now here,
Josh self
highlights what, like remember during Venezuela's con which
by the way, I'm not gonna touch on
much today.
Weird how that sort of just dropped off,
and I think what's interesting is it's obvious
that yet again, the United States embarrassed itself
with trying to overthrow a legitimately elected person
in some other country.
But I'm sure it's not gonna stop. There's
still actions happening, but it's just embarrassing how
much that went wild. And how Elon,
at least 3 times that I personally saw
myself, shared things that were verifiably
false, Which you have a right to be
wrong or lie, that's free speech. But recognize
that. Recognize how often he amplifies things just
because they align with the narrative which by
the way all of his followers are doing.
Or lot that's mostly the paradigm, to be
honest, left or right. That's Twitter files for
you. Convince you that screenshots were good enough.
Just recognize how will how irresponsible that is
at the very
least. When he highlights this saying, just Elon
Musk, quote, tweeting the co leader of a
far right party, Britain First, who is sharing
a fake telegraph headline. That's the only part
I care about. Because it is. It's not
real. And it's the same kind of things
we keep seeing. It leans into the agenda,
and it also helps, this is what I
see in
this, not just him sharing something without checking,
but this promotes the agenda.
This gets people on the right in this
conversation going, Oh my god, that's what they're
gonna do. We gotta stop our immigration problem.
We gotta stop we need and what does
that lead to?
Digital IDs. It leads to biometric control. It
leads to all the things that we if
you may not think that now, but it's
already happening. That's their solution.
Including the people that you think are fighting
on your side.
When in reality, it's you versus the government.
But he says, seen by almost 1,000,000 people
in 15 minutes. Utterly dystopian.
Then it says, over 30 minutes, Musk appears
to have finally deleted the tweet. So they
delete he deletes it. Not a no comment.
No acknowledgement of misleading 2,000,000 people.
Because who cares. Right?
I mean, you don't have to. It's your
right. But I just want people to recognize
how often this is happening. Now, the tweet
itself, for the podcast,
is a fake telegraph headline that says car,
Keir Sturmer or is it car Keir Sturmer?
Starmer. Excuse me. That's that's what we sound
weird. Keir Sturmer
considering building, quote, emergency detainment camps on the
Falkland Islands. Now here's a good point to
make about that ridiculous the people's voice platform.
I'm not I it it wouldn't surprise me
for a moment
that they would be building things like this.
Right? Or that we already know that there
are certain things like this. The conversations in
the United States as well.
Are we I'm no. I don't think anybody
would pretend that there's not a very real
possibility that your government has built these kind
of things in consideration that they may be
losing control. That's clear.
But there is no headline like this, and
there's no
verifiable evidence that I can see that this
actually happening in this location. And maybe maybe
it exists. The point is that nonetheless, it
is still important to call out that this
was a fake headline.
You see, my problem right now is people
like that people's voice platform is they are
intentionally misleading people with subjective and assumptive directions,
you know, leaning into what may be and
then when you point out that they're actually
lying about it, you get attacked by their
followers because you all know it's actually happening.
Because they don't really care that they're being
lied to. It's a game. It's team sport
politics.
So in this case, he deleted it because
it's not real.
Just want people to think about that. Now,
again, the point from before, and this is
what I think the crux of this issue
is what I really want you to consider.
The best way to control the opposition is
to lead it ourselves.
Vladimir Lenin.
This is a historic
a his it's a classic
tactic that's been used damn near everywhere.
And I believe we're watching it right now.
And in in any number of angles, the
mainstream alternative media, this Elon saving free speech,
Trump and the elections. I mean, we are
watching the game played out. I and look.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope to my
to the in everything I have, I hope
that I'm wrong. Because
why wouldn't I? I want the positive things
to happen. The problem is that I think
we're being snowed. I think that we're being
list misled by the people who are giving
you what you wanna hear and then never
delivering like we see over and over. And
then the people that might at that point
go, okay. Wait a minute. I'm done.
They get pulled back in by the leaders
of their paradigm side who aren't really on
your side, who don't really care about these
things, who are either making lots of money
by playing the game or a part of
the agenda or just don't care because it's
fun. Those people are the ones, the partisan
screamers that get you pulled right back in
hoping that, well, you know, well, I do
trust Tucker. He does care. He is a
Christian. Whatever the narrative is, and you fight
you fall back into it again.
Trust your gut. If you see something, it
doesn't line up,
pause.
Take a step back.
Don't lean back in because they just convinced
you that's what you should do. Because team
party or because the Republicans need to win
against the Democrats. Trust your gut and logic.
The politics are the problem.
Now here is a guy who made a
great point about what I keep talking about.
Just one guy from the UK, don't even
not sure who he is, saying that we're
being played, and what telling you how this
will lead. Now, you question it, come to
your own conclusions about what's happening here, but
I really want you to consider let's just
even say exactly what you think is happening
is happening.
This could also be happening on top of
that. Here's what he has to say, shared
by John, Olu Oluuni.
Sky from the UK is telling you you're
being played.
I just wanna quickly do a part 2
from the video last night that I did
regarding
what's going on in the UK in Southport,
Hartlepool, Downing Street. There's things happening everywhere on
this land at the moment.
However,
I just wanted to let you know, in
plain and simple terms,
we're walking straight into a trap.
Keir Starmer, the prime minister of this country,
Jimmy Saville's best mate,
went on TV yesterday.
Don't miss that little part, by the way.
Jimmy Saville, like, the the known pedophile
who apparently was raping children in the in
the the what is it? The,
the royal palace. I mean, all I mean,
this is that's not a joke by the
way. Very, very, very real information that literally
everybody seemed to know about and did nothing.
They it was their Epstein.
Just remember that. This is a a much
bigger problem that we are talking about in
a lot of different ways.
It
went
on TV yesterday,
told The Nation that this is wrong. You're
attacking everything, the mosques and everything. Not that
that we have a problem with the mosques
being here.
Glitched out there. I would rather have
a 100 places of worship than a 100
bars. Now I'm sorry to people that fucking
love the drink. However, it's time to put
down the stupid shit.
It's all about the children,
their future,
and it's looking dangerous because we're about to
walk into a trap.
The government want us to kick off. They
want us to riot against the police. Exactly.
Call him martial law. And once they called
him martial law,
guess what happens then?
They bring in the digital ID.
Yes. You're from this country. You're identified.
Off you go. Everything's peaceful now, and that's
when the digital currency comes in place.
Go Google it. They're back And this is
just like we're talking about on the border.
It's the same problem reaction solution. It's very
transparent. Now that can also exist on top
of what you may think is actually happening.
I just want you to also add the
layer with and there's it's more than just
Tommy Robinson, but that's the most obvious verifiable
Zionist example of driving this.
Weirdly getting let out and all of you
right after October 7th, it's very very strange.
The point is that nonetheless, you've got agent
provocateurs who are driving this.
And in many cases, we've already seen examples
of people pretending to be, like, you know,
this is the conversation you have on every
anything you ever see like this.
Posing as the thing you think you're fine,
whether it's an immigrant or whatever else, and
acting as if you are doing it's it's
the same thing we see with the Zionist
conversations, with the terrorist conversations
where people are pretending to be, you know,
terrorists. Then a lot of times, we're talking
about the CIA, the FBI,
the Mossad.
But whatever we're talking about,
there's a lot of people calling this out.
And instead, you got a lot of people
within the paradigm, at least in this country,
but also in the UK, who are making
it about these people who have a different
color scan. That's the only thing it is.
We're being overrun and this is the other
side of our government driving this because whatever
makes sense.
I guarantee there's some level of overlap but
this is bigger than just the divide of
your government. This is all our governments doing
this to execute the next step of this
phase. And it's being driven a lot and
I think easily provable prove easily shown provable
by Israel
for obvious reasons.
Banks are shutting down left, right, and center,
but I'm not gonna go too deep into
it. I don't wanna get this video removed.
So it is for entertainment purposes, only TikTok.
So, guys, remember,
we're walking into a trap.
We need to unite.
No matter what religion, no matter what skin
color, no matter where you're from, it's time
to unite.
Peace out and see you all in the
lab tonight.
That's a good message.
Right? That's that's what we should be doing.
And it look. If just let's just even
say you think all of that and and
you're
whatever your political side is. If you actually
believe the idea of uniting regardless of your
differences, well, then that then that's different than
what you're hearing from anybody in the paradigm
right now.
You're being played.
2 party illusion. I hope we're paying attention.
Now this is just doing the same thing.
Whites need to be shut up and be
replaced. Right?
You know, and the point is that's not
even remotely what we're talking about. Right? There's
clearly a level of the I've and I
again, the guys watched our show. We've talked
many times in the past about the, you
know, the acceptable racism towards white people in
the in the conversation today and the suppression
of these we've talked about this plenty of
times.
The problem is that people only wanna see
it through their partisan lens and can't recognize
that things exist beyond the one side or
the other dynamic.
Now, this is interesting. Wired put this out
yesterday.
Elon Musk accused Twitter's leadership, before he took
over, of tipping the scales politically.
But now he's doing just that with x.
Again,
people are have already, like, peep people that
see this through a partisan lens, I argue,
are very careful. Oh, I don't wanna lean
into that because that means I'm the lefty
fighting the the the free speech savior.
But if you remove yourself from these binding
childish percept the the idea that it has
to be one or the other, obviously this
is happening. That's just an objective fact. He
is clearly using this platform to better, which
maybe it's his prerogative. It's his platform. He
could do what he wants. But just it's
important to recognize, yes, he has the right
to do these things. But is this something
that
the bottom line is, is it something that
is concerning to you? The idea that he
is influencing very, very large conversations. First first
question by itself, does that bother you? He's
that he's able to use this power to
manipulate pers perspectives and global elections, giving checks
or not based on people's certain like, with
Maduro, for example, despite the fact that he
won is currently that they have removed his
check, which who cares, frankly. But the point
is that does have some level level of
influence. But then, the real
question, whether let's just say that bothers you,
but really whether or not, ask yourself whether
this is more than just him doing it
for his own reasons. Does it worry you?
Does it bother you? Would it be a
problem? Would it be illegal? If it turned
out he was doing this on behalf of
a government.
Yeah. That really does change the conversation, doesn't
it? This military contractor
immersed with the conversation of the great reset
and everything else we should be worried about
that the right was screaming about during COVID
19
suddenly can't see it. Sorta like when Trump
was elected and rolled out all the things
that if it would've been Clinton or if
it was Obama before him, the right would
have lost their minds. But Trump,
well, suddenly, we're, oh, it's okay because he's
he's our side, he's our guy. Right? So
you pacified the constitutionalists. You pacified some of
them anyway. It's the same thing here. But
this is gonna continue.
And no, I'm not asking for it to
be censored or for anything else to happen.
I just think it's important to recognize that
we know there are overlaps with very powerful
entities, Netanyahu included, and we need to ask
whether that's what's going on here. I believe
that's what's happening. Clearly.
Venezuela included.
Now here is what the WHO
said,
the UN, excuse me, about
censorship, misinformation.
This was posted on the 20th September 2023.
Now the reason I'm playing this now is
because it's a larger it's about global misinformation
and how we need to stop that. Showing
you're already framing this as sort of like
a war for the globe.
Now ask yourself how these two things fit
together.
And now we're watching him sort of
be playing a role in creating the thing.
Now this is my point of the larger
discussion about how they when this first started,
they said, Elon's gonna turn this into a
Nazi platform, and it's gonna spread disinformation.
And a lot of us were like, you
know, we're we're mostly just leaning into free
speech. Well, we have a right to do
all that. The point is,
we do. That's free speech. But he is
playing a role that I think is designed
to drive you into a position that is
far more flagrant.
Not just accidentally sharing the wrong thing, but
almost driving people to change the conversation in
very deceptive ways, which then is a first
step and then going, see, that's what you
guys are like we predicted. Now we need
to do something about it. Now that may
not worry you if you think that he's
gonna protect you, but I don't think that's
how that's gonna work. I think it's about
driving us into a position where that becomes
the justification for the action which drives you
into the next phase. And I guarantee it
was gonna be a way that makes it
seem like you chose
that. Right? That Elon rolls out the digital
IDs or however that works, or they lean
into the Jamie Dimon, you know, crip cryptocurrency
under Trump, and we pretend like that's not
the same thing.
It's all happening in front of you. And
I think this is about the this is
the picture that they're driving in, at least
the the creating the justification for why this
kind of thing needs to happen. And we
should all be fighting this from his side
and from the global side. These two platforms
are being misused to subvert science and spread
disinformation
and hate
to billions of people.
This clear and present global threat demands clear
and coordinated
global action.
Our policy brief
on information integrity on digital digital
platforms
puts forward the framework for a concerned international
response.
And that that very document you were just
holding up is one of the main parts
of what we're talking about with GARM.
So right there, you can see the conversation
of them outlining this problem to stop and
this is the GARM kind of solution
and Twitter has now twice partnered with that
very thing. And the World Economic Forum and
so on. It is right now, as far
as I could tell, they are still currently
partnered with them.
Kinda hard to see that as sort of
like 2 arms of the same you know,
this is the this is the two wings
of the same bird conversation.
It's what this is, at least in my
opinion.
Now here,
Glenn Greenwald shared something that I think is
important coming from the
left of that illusion paradigm.
But the point being that this is the
this is what's being driven. Right? And I
get my opinion at the very least. This
is the Kamala Harris administration
conversate laying the laying out the very easily
proven
it's that what he's saying is false.
100% easy to prove. What he says here
is patently false. He's saying that you're not
allowed to spread misinformation. That's not protected under
free speech. It is explicitly
protected.
That's the reality of what free speech means.
Because because but let's be clear, you could
accidentally be wrong. What he's trying to say
is that's not protected. You're gonna be it's
it's a crime now when you make a
mistake. Like, it's just it's actually either
very, very deceptive or just absolute stupidity.
Probably some of both, but something tells me
he probably doesn't even know that he's wrong.
And that's even more terrifying.
But what I'm saying is this is being
set up in a way that's that stupidly
obvious to where he Elon, the rest can
play the role of the one saving you
from this thing.
But in ways that actually cement you into
the same problem. But here's what he said,
it's very short clip. I think we need
to push back on this. There's there's no
guarantee to free speech on misinformation
or or hate speech and especially around our
democracy.
I don't even know what that means especially
around our democracy. He's like, well, maybe I'll
just add the word democracy for for kicks.
You know, it so the point is, yes,
they both are. Without question.
And then apparently, especially around our democracy. I
don't even know why that makes sense with
the conversation. But realize that what he's doing
there is presenting something we know is false,
so we react.
That's how I would read that.
And clearly, as Glenn writes, the the that
Tim Walz falsely believes that free speech guarantee
doesn't include what he considers to be misinformation,
and that's a good way to frame that,
what he considers to be.
Depends on what you think.
Or hate speech will bother almost no damn
supporters
since the vast majority of them want the
state to be empowered to censor dissent, which
is fair. I argue that's a very clear
statement, but let's realize that's now happening on
the right, just in different flavors
where they justify the censoring because a person
made a joke about Trump's assassination or whatever
it is. It's beginning in the same ways.
Now, yes, as always, these things are slanted
one way or the other. There is usually
a slant. But the whole point is how
you drive the other through other manipulations,
drive them to sort of meet in the
middle.
The point is I see this building.
Sharon Joy makes a great point here, and
this is the same conversation. Here's JD Vance
visiting the border,
making a whole statement about how we need
to do and the point, as usual, this
is a setup, she says.
They want a virtual smart wall and biometric
surveillance for every American.
As Whitney wrote here in this great article,
it's it's very clear and this is not
it's a nonpartisan agenda, and Trump and the
rest of them have talked about the biometric
virtual wall, whatever they call it. That's what
that means. But because you pretend that he's
on your side, they're blindly hiding themselves from
it. And she's right. It's a setup. It's
happening on every single angle of this. Now
you cannot have to blindly trust me. Do
your due diligence. Come to your own conclusions.
But I think it's pretty obvious.
And that's where I'll include the point about
the SAVE Act, which was also
rationalized because of their threat of immigration.
Which again, we've proven it. They are mat
they're at least driving through their belligerent foreign
policy,
but I think genuinely manufacturing. And I think
that has to do with Israel as well.
And this is very easy to prove.
The Save Act, Real ID into ID 2020,
using the 2 party illusion and the election
to usher in digital IDs. Make sure you
watch this. I think it's a very easy
discussion to see. It's about a it's a
Trojan horse, including like, you you don't need
to have a bill, which again, the point
was around the save act. I I agree
with the general premise.
That if there's people who are voting illegally,
we should make sure that that's we should
care. Right?
But we don't need the real ID and
and I d 2020
aspect of it. There's plenty of ways you
could make this happen without shoehorning in what
will ultimately be the only one that you're
allowed to use that forces you with digital
I that's what the Real ID and I
2020 are about, digital identification.
And the republicans because they're seeing the idea
that we're stopping illegal immigrants,
Voting apparently, that that just gets right over
those. I mean, again, republicans. There's a lot
of conservatives that I think see this.
Now,
we had to bring this over Well, really
quickly though, just Well, that that I made
all the points that I wanna make there.
But I just wanna stress yet again.
That no matter who you want to be,
what you want them to be, Trump or
Biden or whatever else you believe in,
Always be willing and able to stand back
and ask, is it possible that he's lying
to me? As much as you want everything
else, is it possible that he may be
lied to? That's the point I made about
Trump the whole time. Yeah. I'll give you
the out. Maybe he just doesn't see it.
Maybe he's blinded by his own hubris. They
don't wanna allow himself to recognize, you know,
or why he still supports the very, very
deadly injection.
You know? It's it's
the point is just be willing to ask
whether or not they themselves could be misled,
whether there's a larger thing happening. And if
you're able to stand back from that kind
of blindness inside,
these things are contradictory.
You can see that there's overlapping contradictions. You
can see there are things that just don't
make sense. And at the very least,
don't put that away.
Maybe just decide, okay, well, I don't know
what it is and that's very fair. That's
what you should do, but put it aside
and don't forget about it. What makes this
make sense? Why would there be a contradiction?
The problem is the paradigm, the 2 party
illusion drives people to want to ignore it.
Whether it's because you wanna win, because you
believe he'll save you because God sent him,
whatever it is, they're driving you to ignore
your own instincts.
Don't let that happen.
And on that very note,
this is an important conversation.
James Lee did a really great documentary. So
20 minutes, 21 minutes long. It's it's not
long. It's a very well done documentary.
And I titled this interview, the true nature
of the ADL and how it spies on
Americans for Israel.
Again, I mean, guys, it's just the easiest
thing in the world to prove. And he
does a great job of doing that.
It's a great discussion. Now I I hope
that the idea of this is to recognize
that the ADL, as well as APAC, by
the way, different thing,
same conversation.
Right? One is a supposedly a civil rights
group, which is very much not. One is
supposedly a lobbying group, which is definitely lobbying,
but it's a asset of the Israeli government.
The point is both of these things present
themselves as American.
They just happen to care about Israel because
of the American Jews that live here. That's
not what's happening. You can prove both of
these groups were initiated.
They're they're arms of the Israeli government.
And And that's one of the things we
get into. It's essentially an Israeli spy organization
that you can prove have been and currently
are spying on Americans
for the interest of a foreign government, who
are training
CIA, FBI, local police, or rather, more specifically,
overlap with the CIA,
train the FBI and local police. That's all
on the record.
And have provably taken your information and given
it back to Israel. There's been call the
people have called this out from the US
government in the past.
It's a very terrifying reality. So I'm gonna
play you a couple quick clips of this
just to give you a taste of it.
Make sure you check this out.
Is an Israeli
spy organization
masking around as a supposed civil rights group
and doing real harm to the Jewish community
writ large in order to run cover for
the state of Israel.
So have the power to monitor social media
activity across all major platforms
and change social media algorithms the way they
see fit. Don't believe me? Well, here's Jonathan
Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL. We work
with YouTube to have we to get them
to change their algorithms.
We work with Facebook on trying to use
a redirect method. So when you search for
holocaust, you get directed to, like, a Yad
Vashem page.
We opened a center in Silicon Valley back
in 2017.
And the woman who runs it, she's the
next Facebook executive.
I have software engineers and data scientists working
at ADL. We're monitoring
all this stuff, and we're working with all
the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube
and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam
and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple
to Zoom, we work with all of them.
Some might call that a conspiracy fact.
Just saying. And if their ability to influence
big tech and media isn't disturbing enough,
the ADL also partners with payment platforms like
PayPal to monitor online transactions
and cancel payment processing for those whose speech
they disapprove of. Right? Just to understand this,
is this simply a research effort or is
the ultimate goal, I imagine, to effectively defund
them, which is to say that PayPal would
effectively turn off the spigot or at least
turn off the ability for them to fundraise
using PayPal. That's correct, Andrew.
Well, you guys all remember what happened with
us and PayPal. Right?
Well, that's interesting. I mean, who knows what
the drive was, but it's the same point.
So recognize what they're highlighting there. And and
to be clear,
they still very clearly as by the admission
of Yaccarino
completely work and influence Twitter.
That's that's on the record. They made a
point to say they partnered with the ADL.
And all he's telling you is right there,
we can influence what is allowed to be
posted on Twitter, as well as all the
rest of them. And we're watching that play
out right now. We're watching the Israeli bot
company flooded with bots. We're watching the Authentics
group take your biometric data and use it
for their own purposes. This is alarming as
hell. And people who just don't wanna see
it
because of partisan dynamics will blind themselves to
what's going on.
But this is a really powerful interview. My
really, make sure you watch his documentary, but
then we, the our conversation does I definitely
add some things to it. And a poll
and weirdly enough, the whole time,
he dropped out, like, 5 or 6 times.
And he was so baffled by that. He
was like, I've never had this happen before.
Only maybe once in the past 5 times
in our interview. It's it's pretty incredible.
But I think this is very clear. Now
the point about well, let me make sure
there's no there's another point about that. Just
make sure you watch it. There's a lot
of points about the overlapping problems of the
ADL and the influence and the suppression. And
really, there's there's when we talked about the
the
stated I have the actual link late leak
that I can play for you, but I
think you've all seen it. It's in the
discussion of Greenblatt getting caught on a leaked
audio where he says that they have
spies inside of American Jewish organizations like Jewish
Forces For Peace. So now you've got an
Israeli foreign entity with spies who are spying
on American entities and giving that information back
to Israel and then taking action. And sometimes
violent action.
That needs to worry everybody.
But on the same overlap, I made this
point about APAC. And the point is that
these are both the same kind of different
things, different categories, but the same kind of
concept.
Now the this is I made this point
in a previous show. The American Zionist Council
was an Israeli lobbying group founded in 1949.
It was founded as a tax exempt umbrella
organization of American Jewish groups, which focused on
Israel and including included the Zionist Organization of
America. So founded by Israel,
in Israel, for the United States' interest. Its
Washington representative,
still very clear, was Isaiah l Keenan.
Keenan organized the unincorporated
American Zionist Committee For Public Affairs, the AZCPA,
in 1951.
Following its independence,
AZCPA
began involving the American Jewish Organizations,
not formally committed to Zionism in order to
increase its credibility and separate itself from a
the American Zionist Council's role as a middleman
for the Israeli government.
Then, guess what? AZCPA
was renamed
APAC in 1959.
But let's have them at us how it's
totally an American organization, it's not an Israeli
plan.
It's it's effing right there on Wikipedia.
It was founded by Israel with an Israeli
entity that they that overlapped with US lobbying
and then eventually just got turned into
APAC. But it's totally not what you think
it is, even though it literally says it
right there. And if you point it out,
you're racist.
I so I we are in a dangerous
position right now. Honestly, it's it's been like
this. And it's actually we're in a better
position now than we have been in a
very long time in the sense that we're
seeing it. That the evidence is being shown,
but we're in a dangerous position because the
kind of thing that this kind of government
will do when they're in the corner is
dangerous.
It's it's alarming.
But I hope that I'm I'm not trying
to scare anybody. I just want us to
recognize that that may be why we're seeing
a lot of these crazy dimes.
Now, on this conversation,
may I would just wanna show you a
couple of examples of what we're talking about.
Daniel McAdams
says your stolen tax dollars at work. APAC
will not rest until the US is a
Soviet like system, where there is not even
a single voice of dissent. They are truly
totalitarian
and anti American.
Everyone who loves liberty should dedicate themselves to
defeating AIPAC everywhere.
Daniel McAdams is a very
intelligent,
well respected person. If you don't know, he's
from the Ron Paul Liberty Report and the
Ron Paul Institute. And he does regular podcast
and shows with Ron Paul and and others.
He's a very intelligent person who I recommend
you follow.
That point
Doug, see how it changed. I see for
the podcast. I was it showed that I
wasn't following first. Of course.
Now that's not just a glitch guys. I
think that stuff happens to stop people on
the outside before you click on it to
think something.
Look how look a little region as you
click on it and everything populates. That happens
a lot. But APAC posted this in the
6th. Congratulations to pro Israel progressive leader, Wesley
Bell, on your victory tonight against anti Israel
squad member, Cory Bush.
Being pro Israel is good policy.
I think it's like, they don't even hide
it. They're so full of of impute they
think there's they have impunity.
You're literally pointing out that you funded that
and the point is they make this clear.
It's bipartisan. They funded the vast majority. I
think it was like 74% of all congress.
People the people that won.
That is clear. That is a foreign Israeli
entity that I just showed you
using money to
effectively influence not just policy, but people in
positions of power.
But let's not talk about it because, you
know, you're racist if you point out these
facts.
Now,
rolling this into the conversation of Israel,
I want you to see what we're dealing
with here. Now we're gonna get into some
much darker stuff here, and maybe not all
of it. Well, we're doing pretty good on
time, but
this is the kind of thing that blows
my mind.
So you've got Biden and Trump and RFK
out there telling you that this is just
not the way it looks. Right? That they're
that you're being lied to by racists.
You know? Yeah. There's some problems, but it's
not the way. But yet, here comes Smotrich,
one of the leading examples, one of the
leaders in the leading coalition of the Israeli
government.
Right? Consider this, like, you know, the the
you know, what? I don't wanna make some
wrong overlap. The point is this is a
high leader, a one of the leading entities
within the core group of the Israeli government.
This is posted
where's the date on this? I that's August
9th for today. I think this is, there
it is. Posted August 5th. August 5th.
It says,
might be, quote, justified and moral
to cause 2,000,000 gaznets to die of hunger,
but the world won't let us.
You might think that's a that's
like a parody.
No. It's not the Babylon Bee. It's not
some joke. That's a legitimate statement by one
of the leaders of the Israeli government, that
he believes first that it's justified and moral.
Not to attack only Hamas or starve just
the Hamas, but
to to starve 2,000,000
Gazans. Not even the Israeli government in large
at large is saying that there are 2,000,000
Hamas members. So you cannot take that as
any other thing that he is just. He
thinks it's moral
to to starve to death
all Palestinians.
Children,
elderly,
everybody.
And then says, but, you know, the world
won't let us.
And we're supposed to pretend like that's not
what he thinks? That the idea that they're
not, that worst that Elon Levy and Cogat
will tell you we're not starving. We're shoving
food everywhere.
They're not though. And just because he says
the world won't let us does not mean
he's not slowly doing that.
Not even really slowly, to be honest. It's
just that he's giving little bits of things
here and there and pretending like we're doing
that. They're actively starving these people to death
and causing disease and murdering and raping and
pillaging.
But, you know, the world won't let us.
And we're being told by Biden and everybody
else that this is just not true. How
do we possibly make sense of that?
My question is how anybody acts like this
is not the reality other than people who
are paid to think otherwise and who just
don't wanna see it because they're more they're
emotionally invested with a side.
Everybody else, it's right there.
Now Francesca Albanese from the u special repertoire
for the UN says
oh, let's first read this actually. Joseph Borrell,
from Fonteles from the u EU says deliberate
starvation
of civilians is a war crime. We shouldn't
need to make that clear.
Now Smotrich,
advocating
for it is beyond
ignominus.
Ignominus.
Is that how you say that?
Weird. So it says, we expect the IL
government
to distance itself from his words
and provide
full account of the reported acts of torture
in the said Tiananmen prison. They'll not they're
not gonna do that because they all agree
with him, guys. That's the point.
But he's just simply going, oh my god.
Look at that. And yet still people blind
themselves to it.
And she writes, I anticipate the Israeli government
will not distance itself from Smotrich, which I
agree with. Because his statements is because starving
the Palestinians in Gaza has been an intended
policy of the state of Israel over the
past 10 months, and quite frankly, for a
lot longer than that. They were food insecure
before this started.
European states can't absolve themselves from what they
have let happen in Palestine under their watch.
European Union states knew
and did not move a finger to stop
the genocide that has already scarred this century.
Good on her.
She is done playing games with how much
they've tried to attack her for for BS.
So she's calling out him too. You can't
stand up and act like now you suddenly
care. You let this happen.
They can redeem themselves and stop it now.
How? Arms embargo sanctions, suspension of economic, political,
and diplomatic ties with Israel until it ends.
It's pretty simple. You know, all the things
you otherwise do to people that aren't doing
any of this stuff.
It says, until it ends its unlawful occupation
of Palestinian lands and lives.
Good on her.
Now here is Heretz from August 3rd this
year.
US official spoken out loud, says Biden realized
Netanyahu
lied to him about the hostage deal.
I mean, it's just getting so impossibly frustrating
that we can not only have Israeli media,
we have US officials, we have literally everything
in any position of of of authority
saying it's a genocide. They're killing people. We
can all see it. They're raping people. They're
debating about how they can rape people. And
then we get them going, nope. We're gonna
investigate. We're speaking with Israel, And the deal's
on the way. And it's all Hamas' fault.
And just the same old stuff. No. Yes.
That's always what happens.
But never like this. Never with I mean,
usually the way it would work is that
you have all those groups on their side.
Or at least being quiet. The UN group,
the human rights groups, sort of passively doing
this. And then you just get kind of
steamrolled over with the conversation. Not today, but
yet, they're still going.
What do they have on them?
What threats or blackmail? What's going on? I
or they're just so pro Zionist that they
don't care, that they're destroying everything to allow
Israel to commit genocide.
And here,
TRT World points out that Netanyahu, this says
of the 7th, refutes the US's progress claims.
This is so stupid. So one, you can
see they're being lied to, but 2, then
you got Biden lie lying for him even
further and going, we all Netanyahu said that
we're we're doing good. We're almost there. And
he stands up and goes, that's not true.
What in the hell is just so silly?
I mean, I shouldn't be laughing about this
because it immediately translates to death and suffering.
But it says the he refutes the claims
of progress on the Gaza truce deal as
Tel Aviv's genocidal war and the tiny Palestinian
enclave enters its 307th day.
And here's just the one I've shown a
lot lately because it just is so very
clear
how Netanyahu
has systematically
foiled talks to release hostages from Hamas captivity.
And most of the Israeli population are very
aware of that. Your your government seemingly the
only one lying to the world about it.
And a lot of the people within this
government and people supporting some of it don't
want to acknowledge it.
They're telling you. They're screaming. They're killing our
families.
And they are literally bombing and killing and
sometimes and deliberately shooting them. Acting like we're
trying to save them. It's gotta be one
of the most grotesque I mean, guys, again,
everyone said this. This is going to be
talked about for I I remember I said
this the 1st week.
And I meant it because right then, I
saw this building into what it clearly was
gonna become for a 1000 years. This is
gonna be talked about for a very, very
long time.
Now Ryan Risbiani
says they don't wanna stop
the US.
The US has agreed to guarantee
that Israel will be able to resume the
war after the peace Palestinian resistance in Gaza
after the first phase.
So they don't want any of it then.
I mean, this is what anybody paying attention's
already recognized.
You can't have a ceasefire but go back
to fighting. That's pretty dumb. But, apparently, they've
worked it out. Apparently, Biden's yep. Cease fire,
then you can keep fighting. We're good then.
Right? Shut up. Shut up, Palestinians. We don't
care what you think. That's what's happening.
They're gonna continue so they're gonna look, my
point is Hamas is not gonna accept this
because what you're doing is going, well, you're
gonna give up all your leverage and then
we're gonna go back to fighting. Okay?
No.
Whatever you think of Hamas, nobody in their
right mind would make that make sense, and
they don't care.
US guarantees Israel can resume the war after
the captain swap. So they're gonna say, no.
They're gonna say, see, Hamas doesn't want a
deal despite how everybody with any standing, including
Israelis, are going, we've had a deal 45
times and Netanyahu will let it happen.
A Biden's just too blinded by his senility
to actually see it. Who knows?
Now after that point, I wanted to show
you one thing before we get into the
kind of hardest part of the conversation.
This is really interesting to me. And this
just shows me how truly desperate these propagandists
are. People like Aviva Clampas who have literally
rested their entire
reputation on this genocide.
Keep pumping. I I often ask myself how
this person gets these kind of stories. This
isn't
tied to anything. There's no link. There's no
intelligence. There's not the Israeli government say. This
is just her posting this with an image.
Clearly, the point I'm making is that she's
invested at a higher level than just being
a cofounder of Boundless,
former mission of the UN. Like, this is
a propagandist at an official level, in my
opinion, for what's going on.
But she says the IDF has located smuggling
tunnels, which main point first is that who
why you would ever blindly believe a tweet
with text and a shot? Well, because Twitter
files, but we shouldn't.
She says located smuggling tunnels between Gaza and
Egypt that are large enough to drive vehicles
through. Sound familiar?
She says dozens of tunnels have been found
along the Philadelphia corridor,
including at least 25 that crossed into Egypt.
The tunnels were used by terrorists to smuggle
weapons.
Well, you know what I can prove as
a matter of fact? That they already know
about those tunnels. It's been written about many
times. So this really desperate, lazy effort by
the Clampus to act like they just discovered
something that they've written about, that they know
is there, and have monitored and been a
part of, is bad. It's embarrassing.
Because we've talked about this. This is a
National Geographic article.
Just wanna I don't want to scroll back
down. Come on, there we go. God dang
it. National geographic article from
20 where was it?
27 2012.
The tunnels of Gaza.
There's a lot more in there, just this
one section I'm gonna show you. But this
point, this is what got my attention. Somebody
shared this and it stood out to me.
It basically says,
according to an interview International Crisis Group report,
quote, a handful of rockets
are launched by young militants
hired by local merchants
whose profits would decline
if Israel's closure were relaxed.
Meaning, that they they just kinda lob off
rockets to do no you know, shoot into
a field somewhere. And so then Israel goes,
okay. We're we have to be tighter because
they're firing at us. And in the article
and point is, the one of the main
things, most of what comes through,
And the point is, the one of the
main things,
most of what comes through these are not
weapons. It's
food,
medicine,
TVs, and fun things for kids. And it's
very clear because they have closures, and they
can't get anything. So this is basically a
smuggling operation for just damn near everything, but
it also includes weapons.
And my point is that Israel makes money
from that. They facilitate the process. And here,
you can see that they know this is
what's happening. It's publicly discussed,
and they just use it because why they
want to keep this dynamic.
One, they wanna keep you thinking bad guy
Hamas is firing the rockets that keep you
in danger so they can keep their closures
and keep the whole security dynamic going. But
they also
wanna be able to make money on the
process. And so now she comes around and
goes, look at these things we just discovered.
Back in 2,000 way before 2012.
But you can you get my point about
how ridiculous these people are?
That we can't do our own research here.
We can't recognize
these things that are so shockingly obvious that
are right in the plain view of both
Egypt and Israel, and we're supposed to act
like we don't see cars driving through these
tunnels? It's just stupid, guys. I mean, it
I this is to me, it's a a
desperate, fleeting effort to direct your attention away
from all the things we're now seeing.
By the way, I think I briefly mentioned
in a second, but there's there's they bombed
more schools. They're murdering more people literally every
moment we're talking right now. And the grotesque
reality around all of it is that
we're talk what mean it's you know it's
happening. So it's so gross that that has
become secondary in the conversation.
Because it's so common right now that I
don't need to convince you that they're murdering
children in schools. But think about how wild
that is.
Now
we're gonna start in on the discussion of
the prison and the torture that's happening in
there with the conversation of Scott Ritter. Because
I think at least part of this and
why it happened was because of something he
recently said. At least the timing is very
interesting.
But antiwar.com,
again, who you should definitely be following, writes
FBI raids the home of former UN weapons
inspector Scott Ritter. This was I'm sure you've
all seen this by now.
Ritter told reporters outside of his New York
home that he was raided because of the
FAR Act,
literally, the Foreign Agent Registration Act. This is
what's what's what everybody immediately pointed out is,
but, of course, they don't care about APAC.
Does even this article he does the same
in the article.
FARA has been used to target people for
their political views
and is selectively enforced, of course.
For example, the pro Israel lobbying group, APAC,
who spends 1,000,000 on pro Israel candidates who
I just proved to you was literally a
farm and it was created it's an Israel
asset and and it's an arm of the
Israeli government. But yet, no big deal because
we don't care about that. Or any other
number of overlaps where they don't make an
issue about Israeli entities or other entities they
don't care about, but they'll make a big
issue about things they want you to think
even though there's no way to prove it
like this right now. Or that it's completely
manufactured.
So here
is what he said. Well, first, Aaron writes
Scott Ritter, a vocal critic of the US
proxy war in Ukraine and of the Israeli
government, said that the FBI raided his home
over the FAR Act. On top of the
free speech implications here, it's noteworthy that this
happened just as APAC, which is not registered
as a foreign agent, celebrates its $8,000,000
investment in the ousting of an elected member
of congress, as I just showed you. Now
here's, that other he says something there in
front of the people out the street. I
find this one to be a little more
specific. Here is his statement directly to you
guys sitting in his chair talking about this.
Hello. As everybody's probably figured out by now,
the,
FBI has executed a search warrant on my
home.
The search warrant
was based upon
what they deemed to be probable cause that
I am in violation of the foreign agent
registrations
act,
And they, executed a search warrant,
looking for electronic devices, my computers, my cell
phone,
things of that nature.
Based upon their questions, it appears that they
are primarily concerned about my relationship with RT
and Sputnik.
More specifically,
that I am receiving direction from
RT and Sputnik, and I'm being compensated for
this. And that means that I am working
on behalf of
the Russian government.
I let them know in no uncertain terms
that that is absolutely
not what's happening, that any compensation I get
from RT and Sputnik is the same as
I get from any
journalistic,
entity that I,
provide art.
Now ask yourself how that compares to Israel
openly
funding people who are spreading things online,
funding politicians,
funding any number of things through APAC, and
many other very much more
what's wrong? They're all illegitimate, but much more
illegitimate means.
So he's literally getting paid for work with
a journalist out with a journalistic outlet. But
because they don't like it or because they
named that Russian controlled, suddenly you're okay. Let's
just even say you think that lines up
or you think that's enough to do this.
You know how many examples you can show
from Israel or other groups that they work
with, Saudi Arabia, that do this right in
the open?
That's the point. That's why far as selectively
applied, and it's not about anything like that.
It's about the fact that he is inconvenient
for their agenda.
Kohl's War Video Products 4.
I am a journalist, and, I get compensated
for my work. We
shall see where it goes.
They were in my house for 5 and
a half hours.
Very professional, very courteous.
I have no problems with the people who
executed the search warrant. I do have a
problem with the search warrant itself.
Let's just be very clear.
No crime has been committed. I am not
a foreign agent. I am not in violation
of the foreign agent registration act, and they
know this.
This was an act of intimidation by the
US government,
designed to have a chilling effect.
I was accused of, that my articles were
designed to
manipulate the opinion of the American people on
behalf of the Russian government.
And that's what we always get. That was
the conversation of these Facebook memes in 2016.
The point is that, well, the truth was
used to manipulate you because that truth was
in the benefit of the Russian government. That's
what largely we got from that conversation.
Also, is what he's saying true? Well, yeah.
It is.
So the conversation is that you're not allowed
to do anything that they think is the
interest and that helps some whether or not
it's true. So what they're doing is effectively
unconstitutional in many different ways, but I think
you already know that. That my podcast do
the same thing. Ask the inspectors, apparently,
a Russian propaganda tool designed to, again, manipulate
the thinking of the American people.
This is absurd in the extreme. This
raid on my home was designed to have
a chilling effect,
to make me think twice about speaking out,
about writing, about doing podcasts. And as I
told the FBI, and I'll tell you now,
there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that
I'll back down because I'm doing nothing wrong.
I'm doing what every concerned American should be
doing when they believe that their government is
behaving in a manner that doesn't conform with
the values and principles that are set forth
by the founding fathers in the constitution of
the United States of America.
That is the most American thing you could
say.
Right? Challenging
your government is the most American thing you
can do. I am an American citizen holding
my government accountable
and exercising the rights given to me by
the constitution.
Today, the United States government declared war on
me.
Now I hate to say that that add
I it's he maybe I'm sure he just
said it fast speaking. I think he's made
this point before, but the constitution does not
give you rights. These are god given inherent
rights that are outlined within the constitution.
Very clearly stated by the founding fathers in
just basic reality that these are things that
are, whether they ever wrote that down, were
things that you already had. And I'm I'm
he knows that. He said this before, but
just to make that clear in passing.
They declared war on my ability to write,
my ability to speak, my ability to interact
with the American people, indeed, with a broader
international audience.
So be it. We're at war. It's not
a war I plan on losing. And I
can tell you that,
there is no chilling effect. Look forward to
seeing me in the future as soon as
I get the ability to, to interact more
efficiently. But,
thank everybody for their concern,
and, I'll see you Friday night on Ask
the Inspector.
Very interesting.
So here, as Casey Wright points out, is
at least one of the things that was
highlighted. So apparently, this was discussed and then
the next day this happened.
So you can decide for yourself. I I
I think it's probably
multifaceted.
But it's pretty interesting what he said right
here, which is even in this current con
conversation
considered contentious,
but it's completely accurate.
And,
you know, perverted parody.
When when the Israelis jail 9 soldiers for
raping,
Palestinian prisoners and,
and
then
Israeli citizens rise up and say that,
the Talmud,
interpretation of a Jewish,
law,
says it's not a crime to rape non
Jews and that these men should be freed.
Not only that, then they sent hundreds of
people to the Palestinian prisons demanding to be
allowed in so they can rape the Palestinian
prisoners because they're permitted to under Jewish law.
This led to See, that's the issue for
what I I think for people to get
I think this is what might have drawn
the problem is that he's what he's saying
is true, but it's it's a lesser discussed
part of this conversation. That there is a
very clear belief within some portion of specifically
the Jewish population in Israel that believes that.
And that's obviously problematic.
And, look, to be clear, this is not
debatable. This is what they were and I'm
gonna show you on their discussions, on these
talk shows, where there's active
and, like,
energetic responses about how this is the reality,
that we have a right to do this.
And that's very alarming.
But, look, to be clear, there's plenty of
Jews in the world that do not think
that, do not agree with that. But in
this country, there's clearly a problem and I
believe that has to do with the Zionist
control. That's my opinion, you can decide for
yourself. But that being stated
by somebody with his standing as on on
judge not putting Napoleon on a show, clearly
struck a nerve.
Palestinian
prisons demanding to be allowed in so they
can rape the Palestinian prisoners because they're permitted
to under Jewish law.
This led to a near civil war, in
Israel where soldiers were facing off against soldiers.
You know, this isn't bad Hollywood movie. This
isn't the, you know,
the preface to some sort of zombie apocalypse.
This is reality happening in Israel right now.
Our ally, we claim that Israel and America
is alike in many ways. I don't know.
When was the last time 500 American citizens
stormed a state prison saying we need to
be allowed in to rape the prisoners because
we're permitted to under our religious beliefs. So
that's happening in Israel as we speak. The
the 9 soldiers were released now from custody.
They're not gonna be charged with a crime
because apparently in Israel, raping prisoners is no
longer a crime.
That's just one thing. They're blowing up they
blew up a school today with students in
it. The school burned. The students were inside
the school burning to death. The parents were
outside
listening as their children screamed as they were
burned to death. That's that happens on a
daily basis. What Israel has become literally
the the worst incarnation
of what we could imagine Nazi Germany was
like back in the day. I mean, it
it it's
Think about that.
Now, he does go on to make a
point that he does he believes that what
Hitler did was, you know, objectively worse. But
his point is to say that it's it's
on it's objectively clear,
objectively the fact that they are committing
to at a level that we're that we
can discuss in the context of world war
2 and the holocaust.
Obviously. And the fact that it's somehow, like,
racist, it's just it's a desperate
rejection of everything that you can prove.
And it's kinda hard not to see how
that might well have been what happened. Right
there.
Especially with what we just talked about with
the ADL, the influence of our of our
law enforcement, or the or the lobbying groups,
or the politicians currently in power, like Brian
Mast who are actively part of the IDF
who clearly who act in the interest of
foreign governments before their own.
This used to be stuff that people would
freak out about, but the point is you
can prove these things.
Prove them.
Document this stuff.
As my opinion,
I mean, insofar
I was gonna say it has nothing to
do with Jewish people, and I believe that.
But the point is, obviously, there's an overlap.
My point is to say this, it's not
unique to Jewish people. Zionists are predominantly Christian
these days. The bottom line is I think
it's even bigger than that. The point is
to make this about one religion as opposed
to the religions that are being used by
the culprit,
that's where I think the problem lies. But
it's up for you to decide. Either way,
my god, guys. I mean, that's some especially
evil stuff.
Now we just talked about this. This was
on July
29th.
I I framed it as Israeli soldiers arrested
for gang rape protected by leadership, because that's
what was happening. And, of course, I haven't
been able to follow-up on it until now.
So let's go over some of this stuff.
Now briefly, again, I I think I briefly
said some of this before,
but there's been multiple arguments made about this,
which are just unreal.
One of which was that they raped themselves.
That's not a joke. Very public.
Another was that they did it in self
defense. That point I made before, and you'll
find all this very public online,
is that this is what you get from
the Zionist Israelis every time.
Here's 4 different possible narratives. Could you pick
what you like best and we'll go with
that one?
Otherwise, means we're lying. It's pretty damn obvious,
guys. And as we've heard many, many times,
which I don't probably don't need to play
again, but I just think it's fitting. Let
me let me preface these remarks with I
never, never, ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
Mhmm.
I had a clip from him coming up
in a second, actually.
But just constantly throwing out the different narratives.
The reality is, as we've now been it's
been easily proven,
was they just raped these people.
Because they hate them.
To torture them. To make them suffer. And
the kind of suffering that we I almost
don't even wanna get into is so unreal.
The idea
of using something and jamming this in their
in their rectum to the point to where
you puncture a lung.
Think about what that means in your body.
Like, this is why people have died. And
we're not even getting into that. The one
that we got publicized is somebody who went
to the hospital. The reality is that people
have been dying
secretly in these torture prisons since long before
October 7th.
And as Sam Husseini has been pointing out
from the beginning, this is why they made
up these lies of 40 beheaded babies, of
systemic rape. Because this is what was already
happening, and this was near guaranteed to happen
at this level after what they said happened
October 7th. And all the overlaps of them,
foreknowledge, involvement, and of the Hannibal Directive, all
that gets ignored because they shove these lies
down your throat.
Not helping. It's not working, though. People are
seeing it.
Now, this is from the 6th.
Just, it's unreal. I'm gonna play I'm gonna
show you this video because it's you got
to see this.
But I simply said, how can anyone defend
what the Zionist government is not just allowing,
not just even defending,
but promoting,
glorifying even. Does anyone honestly support what Israel
is doing today?
Other than the paid Israeli bots that have
taken over Twitter, that is?
Because realize, the people that well, I'll show
you the people they've let out despite Matt
Miller lying to everybody acting like there's an
ongoing investigation.
That
they were applauded.
Smotrich called them heroes.
This video
shows you what happened. As Censorman points out,
the world's most moral army blocks a Palestinian
hostage with shields and then rapes him.
And, by the way, this has been publicly
discussed on their own corporate media. It is
very real.
Now there's been some horror stories on top
of this
That if that, b m on on Twitter,
who's the he's the anti Zionist Hebrew as
he frames himself, who I believe is in
Israel. He's been talking about what he's been
hearing from people around this, which is completely
up in the air.
The reality though of of stuff that and
this is conversations coming from IDF members that
have shared these videos with their friends.
Of doing all sorts of horrifying things like
you jamming cell phones up there. And calling
and making photos of it and sharing and
laughing about how they were smuggling things.
Really dark stuff, guys. It's not just one
person.
It's groups that is systematic, that's systemic, that's
aware, that is being allowed, being promoted by
leadership like Smotrich.
Let's not forget, by the way, Beth Sellum,
the leading Israeli human rights group, leading leading
group of the world for that matter. It
says it is as it it put out
a report called welcome to hell.
The Israeli prison system has a network of
torture camps. This is an Israeli human rights
group.
It said I I wrote Israeli's leading human
rights group, Beth Selim, released a report, welcome
to hell. It finds Israeli prisons
in which every Palestinian inmate is intentionally condemned
to serve
relentless pain and suffering operates as a de
facto torture camp, or as de facto torture
camps.
That's what they found.
An Israeli intel or, human rights group. And
it goes on to say the abuse was
so so systemic
that there is no room for doubt and
organized declared
policy of the Israeli prison authorities.
The new policy is applied across all prison
facilities
to all
Palestinian prisoners.
This is after a long term investigation.
Then you've got the unit United Nations.
Israel's escalating use of torture against Palestinians in
custody, a preventable crime against humanity. You don't
wanna read that report. It's there for you
to check out. It's horrifying.
The point, guys,
this is exactly what they are accusing,
projecting
on whatever's going on with Hamas. Ignoring the
fact that they funded them, made sure that
they were in power, to use this to
stop the Palestinians from getting what they should
be getting.
All this.
And they're doing this right in front of
you.
And then you get the promotion of it.
You get them praising this stuff.
As the squirrel points out, FYI, this report
extensively documents the the system a systematic Israeli
sexual violence and raped Palestinian children, women, men.
And the Associated Press only has one vague
reference buried deep in the piece to abstract
alleged sexual violence, but they laundered the mass
rape hoax with glee. His point in this
is that even in the report where they're
admitting, even the Associated Press, that what you're
hearing is true, waterboarding, electric shocks, torture, rape,
Everyone's made this clear, but they water it
down to the point to where, like, he's
comparing it to the mass hoax mass rape
hoax,
proven to be a hoax.
That they absolutely you know, the point is
that even as they're admitting this stuff, they're
try they're playing the game.
And here's the EuromED human rights monitor.
They brought Israeli civilians to watch our nude
torture.
An IDF IDF torture of Palestinian prisoners is
turned into entertainment for Israeli viewers.
There's something very wrong here in this society.
Notice a long thread.
It's a long thread of a lot of
different videos, all of which is highlighting this
problem.
Systemic rape.
But they write in a report from Save
Children UK
in July reminds us that before October 7th,
already
69%
of the 100 of Palestinian children
abducted by Israel experienced sexual violence.
Children
from a hue from save our children UK
are making this point. Since October 7th, children
report being sexually assaulted, harassed, and strip searched,
beaten.
The sexual predator himself finally made himself useful,
it says. In these testimonies, he collected from
a soldier and an officer at the Sid
Tiamen
Torture Prison.
We see how both believe the mass rape
pokes and use it to justify the horrors
of the facility including sexual violence.
You can read all this for yourself. This
is all very clearly documented.
Loki points out something on top of it
all. Another thing nobody talks about, this is
a quote, is the is all the bodies
in fridges near the holding pens.
Just containers full of dead bodies of inmates.
That is within an Israeli source talking about
this. That's we've we've shown you him before.
Somebody who first was try was siding with
the Israeli government until he he saw the
reports and he made this whole post about
how he's embarrassed that he didn't trusted them
without questioning them.
Fridges.
Containers full of dead bodies.
The point is that this is how many
of them were raped to death? How many
of them are literally killed because of torture?
The point is, this is undeniable now. It's
happening. We're not talking about the the way
the focus is on the one example,
as I'm gonna play in a second. It's
just the tip of the iceberg.
Now Ryan Ruzbiani points out something that really
I mean, I I thought about this all
night through the night.
Israel has locked up in 690
children since October 7th.
690 children.
I don't know how you wanna pretend that
makes sense with whatever human shields. How do
you want to arrest them then?
Are they Hamas? They're children, guys.
Because they're Palestinian. That's why.
The total is over 21,000
via Shin Bet.
The point though, this is what who just
been arrested. Not necessarily
all still currently held. But I my point
is, it's a lot. And we can prove
that.
But they arrest and torture and release people
all the time with no charge. Many of
them never get released.
Here's one, a woman.
This is, who was it again?
I think it's in it's I think it's
in the video. I watched this before. The
point is, she's highlighting
how many are currently held.
Now, whatever you think about this, my only
point is, whether it's 250 currently held or
still 1,000,
what is happening to them?
We just saw what's happening to grown men.
There's clear examples going back a long way
of them torturing and abusing these children. They're
being held in these prisons for a long
period of time.
God only knows what's happening. I think it
matters a lot more to me that we're
talking about innocent children. I mean, really frankly,
it's all a problem, obviously. All of these
people's lives matter.
But there's just a special, you know, any
for anybody's perspective I think. A child is
something in a whole another level.
That Israel holds nearly 10,000
political prisoners. This includes 79 women and 250
m minors. I'm Anat Matar, a senior lecturer.
Anath Matar, senior lecturer at Tel Aviv University
since 2004. At Tel Aviv University. Israel calls
them security prisoners, and they face different treatment
from ordinary prisoners. They're limited in their ability
to see a lawyer subject to torture and
illegal interrogation methods,
disproportionate sentences, harsh living conditions, no phones, and
little means of communicating with their families. And
they, you know, know this.
If she knows that, that means this stuff
is pretty much public knowledge. Now, many of
them don't agree with that. I mean, that's
why she's speaking out. But think about what
a problem that is if it's that known,
that embedded in the society. To where it
is public practiced publicly.
Or, you know, to to an extent. Right?
That it's kind of a known reality that
they do this to these people.
Often, they are kept in isolation. And they
have only a slim chance of early release
of parole. Yes. Some of these people are
in prison because they were involved in violent
resistance, but 1,000 have been punished for categorically
nonviolent activities Mhmm. Like organizing demonstrations
or being part of a political movement. Perhaps
worst of all, Palestinian political prisoners
can be arrested without Trump, a practice known
as administrative detention. This one currently holds 34100
administrative detainees.
I think it's a hell of a lot
more than that. That's what they admit to.
I've I've seen reports of upwards of 10,000,
especially since October 7th. But either way,
thousands of people held, in some cases for
years. One guy got released after 20 years
with not a single charge.
Quite the democracy if that's even what we
should want. It can be held indefinitely.
The period of the detention gets renewed without
any explanation. And without Oh, we just talked
about that woman who's a human rights act,
a lawyer, I think. A human rights lawyer.
She was arrested. Somebody just made a spotlight
case about her,
and they just renewed her detention for 4
more years.
Just like that. No charge.
That's what happens if you're, you know, care
about human rights in the wrong direction in
Israel.
Knowing the reason for the arrest. Since October
7th, it's become even worse. Stay tuned for
our upcoming reel on the Steadman
prison. Now here, Brian also adds this.
This is a torture camp.
Expose this to the world. Now there's a
graphic that was made by, what's the I
forget the name of the group. It's the
AA. It's the I think it's Turkish.
The point is it's very clear what this
is. They name it as Israel's Guantanamo.
Sidium in prison is notorious for reports of
torture and maltreat maltreatment of Palestinians.
1000 of Palestinians arrested by these forces are
being held in military installations located in the
southern Negev desert with 36 detainees having reportedly
died since then.
That's what we know about.
And these are people that are not charged
with crimes.
They this is the people we see with
their hoods on and their clothes removed, and
they always love to come out and go
look at all the tariffs we collected.
They're talking about Palestinians. That's it.
And if you look at the history, it
just it's not obviously, did not start on
October 7th.
Force stripping, prolonged and severe blinding,
blindfolding, laceration of the body parts, electrocution, systematic
starvation, deprivation of sleep, bathing, and medical care,
dog attacks, including raping with dogs. That was
backed up by the EuroMed human rights group,
using dogs to rape men.
Exposure to extreme cold surgical operations without anesthesia.
Guys, this is Nazi stuff.
This is what we're dealing with.
It's unreal how we can't people are afraid
to talk about this. Here's Adam pointing out,
this is a paper from 9 years ago.
Sexual torture of Palestinian men by Israeli authorities.
But, sure, it's all propaganda that started after
after October 7th. Just keep lying to yourselves,
for those that don't wanna hear this. Middle
East eye points out on the 30th July,
Israeli lawmakers justify rape of Palestinian prisoners. So
let's get into that.
I've already shown you this one. Here's b
m I was referencing before. It's it's at
at I really hate you on on Twitter.
Just highlighting what they're saying.
That they're rationalizing it. Just to make the
point very quick, I've shown you this already.
Here, this is at the the Knesset meeting,
an emergency session because of this, back on
29th.
And they ask to insert a stake into
a person's rectum. Is that legitimate? I've already
shown you this.
And he says, shut up. Yes. If he
is a Nakba,
which, of course, the word Nakba translates to
catastrophe, which references
If
he's
a
Nakba,
it says. If he's in Nakba, it says.
Everything is legitimate to
do. Even if you actually think this is
a legitimate terrorist or a member of Hamas
or whatever you think, that's still incredibly illegal
and just straight up disgusting
to act like they can do whatever they
want.
On top of that, that Smotrich himself has
said, well, they're allowed to or I mean,
Van Gavir basically said that they are allowed
to. They control those places. They could do
what they want.
This is not
it's this goes against everything that we pretend
we are.
And they're proudly you can tell by what
looking at this. A lot of them are
not okay with this.
Or at least just not okay with it
being publicly pointed out, I would argue. Most
of them in this room don't care, if
not all. But my point though is that
clearly, they are actively proudly saying that this
is okay. And now what Ritter's point is
what gets this very uncomfortable for most of
them is this is not just about we
hate these people. It's about the idea of
pretending that your religion
makes it okay.
Now here
is another this this is one of the
worst things I've seen.
Hotspot points this out. After getting caught raping
Palestinian detainees, Israeli television
is making the case, at least some of
them, some of them are actively pushing back
on it, making the case that nothing is
off the table, and that the IDF should
act with impunity.
And literally arguing not just that they should
keep doing it, but that they should make
it
institutional.
This should be part of our actions because
it'll stop them from doing another October 7th.
I said, this is what the extremist
Zionist ideology,
not unique to Jews alone, has done to
the people of Israel.
The normalization and rationalization
of torture, rape, murder,
as long as you feel you're on the
right side.
That sound familiar to anybody?
That is sociopathic mentality. And that is what
we're being driven to right now by this
whole technocratic right.
Dig you know, all the people we just
talked about.
And it's not unique to that, but that's
the focal point right now. I could point
out the same problems in the left. The
rationalization that you're allowed to, you know, mutilate
children because of your ideology. The point is
that this,
as long as you as long as you
believe you're the good one, you're on the
right side, you rationalize all of this, it's
the same thing happening here, we're just a
a earlier stage.
Here's what's here's what they said.
It says, I told my friends that I
don't give a a rats a s s
s about what they do to a guy
like that. This is the guy making this
case.
And the guy goes, what? Is that really
what you think? And he goes, yes. Unequivocally.
Turned down his touch.
He goes, wait, wait, wait, I'll explain. Soldiers
who are suspected in criminal offensive rape? He's,
like, still asking him.
Yes, he says. Yes. Of a cuffed prisoner?
It doesn't interest you? Like, the guy is,
like, aghast. Like, how in the world because
anybody with any sense of morality,
integrity, anything. Like, not you're you are a
subhuman
monster if you're literally arguing that they should
be able to do whatever they want because
you've decided he's the bad guy. And many
of which, we've already proven, are not charged
with a crime.
He says, okay, does the morality of our
soldiers not interest you? Now see, that's the
right the point is that even if you
think these are terrorists, this is about you.
This is about what you believe and what
you are
capable of. By doing that, I've made this
point many times, that all that shows you
is that you are just as bad as
them, and especially if you recognize that the
person you're doing it to is not a
member of Hamas, but simply a Palestinian, so
you're the problem. But either way, the point
is that when you bring that down, you're
simply acknowledging that you're just as bad as
what you claim you're fighting.
He says no problem. By the way, they're
not soldiers. In fact, they're not soldiers. They're
who are criminals,
except they haven't been charged with a crime.
They haven't gone
through a court process, mister democracy. But, yeah,
they're criminals because we've decided because they are
from an area we think are all terrorists.
That's the point.
It
says, again, I don't give a rat's a
s s what you do to the Hamas
man.
I always remember, first of all, the only
thing that's a problem for me here
is that it's not a regulated policy of
the state to abuse the detainees.
That's actually what he's saying.
He says because first of all, they deserve
it. And it's great revenge
that we need to give them.
Right. Revenge is not usually something you hear
in a conversation about what's just. Right?
He says, and secondly,
maybe it will also serve us a little
more as a deterrent.
Raping men.
This is the moment the other side, who
we need to remember, Josh, we need to
remember it well,
And never lose our focus or cool down.
These people tied 30 of our daughters on
trees on the 7th October. Get ready for
the fake atrocity propaganda, which has all been
debunked.
And they did to them acts that are
not less severe. I I don't
even wanna make a comparison.
There He's talking about the the claims of
rape, which have completely been shown to have
been manufactured.
At the very least, wildly unproven. But that
even has been I mean, the UN investigation,
I mean, I don't need to go through
it all again. That's what the squirrel has
been breaking down for the longest time,
the mass hoax
recycling through New York Times and then they
had to pull it back down. The investigation
which they all said proved it, then she
came out and said, no. It didn't. We
didn't find the evidence. In fact, many of
them lied.
Over and over and over, they keep pushing
these claims and every new one, like, oh
my god. Here it is. We proved it.
And then it gets pulled back down because
it showed they lied or the it's all
based around the claims of a Zaka guy
who made everything up, and that was now
been debunked.
40 beheaded babies or the babies in ovens
or everything.
His point is that who knows if he
even knows that or not? It doesn't matter.
You're simply saying because of all the stuff
we got told, we should do worse to
them.
Dang
it.
And it says yeah. And secondly,
under the current,
it says, this is the moment the other
side
who we need to remember, Josh? Oh, I
already saw that.
There it is.
And they did to them acts that are
not less severe.
Severe and extreme racism. So first of all,
they deserve it. And it's very appropriate revenge.
It's just a shame that we don't do
it, and that he really repeats this
in an institutionalized
way. That's the word he used. As part
of regulations
for torture of prisoners.
You know, the just because our government lies
to us about what they do in a
very institutionalized way, like with Guantanamo and well
after that,
doesn't mean that they don't still do it.
It's obvious. We talked about that during Trump's
administration. I forget the woman's name that they
put at the head of the CIA, and
she was literally responsible for torture. And they
just, oh, no. I don't do that anymore.
Obviously, that's not the case. And it's obvious
that they all feel this way. Where do
you think this stuff comes from?
And by the way, it's proven a a
1000 times over that torture had this gives
no fruitful results,
which we saw in the beginning of this
from Israel. They got caught for torturing people
to say what they wanted and that's why
it was easily proven even from within their
own sources to be not accurate. Claims of
the rape allegations or claims of 40 beheaded
babies, which turned out to be false. But
yet, sure enough, here's a video of this
shaky man in a room telling you exactly
what they told him to say.
That's the point.
So the point is when you're doing these
things, if you know that, it's really just
because you're a terrible, disgusting person who wants
to hurt people because you think you're justified.
This is because the next guys who think
about doing in October 7th, you know, to
ignore the foreknowledge and the acts and the
Hannibal and all that,
We'll say, you see what they're doing to
them in Israel. Yeah. I mean, he's probably
not wrong. Anybody that might act will go,
gee, what? Maybe careful. They might rape you
if you get taken. But nonetheless, that makes
you the worst person alive.
Don't even think about it. He says, first
of all, I'm sorry that these things are
even being said. That's the other guy. Like,
he's like, this guy's embarrassing me because what
he's doing here is simply incitement to violence.
He is.
He says, oh, no, sarcastically, really?
Real excitement? He says, this man just expressed
support to the criminal offense of rape being
committed on prisoners.
At least there's some pushback.
Horrible terrorists, Hamasmen who want to kill you
too, he says.
Which, of course, that's the the the the
lie. These people are just out to kill
Jews no matter what, which is just simply
not the case. And it says, and to
abduct you and and f you like.
I'll just emphasize the point. He says, I
think he's not. No one here is.
I think Josh isn't trying to defend this
scum. This is what's crazy. The other guy
steps in going, he's not. You're misunderstanding him.
And he comes back in and goes, no.
You're wrong. I am supporting them and I
want this to happen.
Because I think the question is, it is
appropriate is it appropriate for an IDF soldier
under any circumstances to insert a sharp object
into a person's buttocks? This is what he
says.
I mean, for crying out loud, the guy
just explicitly stated that we should because that
will deter future future actions. But he's hoping
he gave him an out here.
He says when we're talking about Hamas Man,
a man who burned children, again, not real.
They lied about this, easily proven.
Who raped women, same thing.
That his whole idea is to take each
and every one of us. Again, this lie
about how it's all about. It's not the
reality.
Not as a not as a a, you
know, I'm and my point is always, I'm
sure there's somebody out there on I any
side that might have designs for whatever we're
talking about. But by and large, it's been
shown clearly that that's not the objective here.
Throw us in the sea and commit the
worst possible acts on us. Okay. So if
you believe that, all you're saying is you're
just as bad as they are.
The revenge they deserve to get. And more
than that, it needs to be a deterrent
force. So, again, not just that they're you're
as bad as them, but what you're showing
is that you're a very weak person. You're
a very low, small, petty, weak person who's
just succumbing to the idea that you wanted.
I wanna do it back. Right? It's like
kindergarten level.
I'm sad that Josh's words wait, he didn't
say anything.
How are you anyway, you get this is
bad. Sorry. It's probably confusing the podcast. They're
going back and forth. And the guy's basically
really trying to stress that this is what
he's okay with, and they're still trying to
kind of water it down for him.
And then he concludes the the actual video
of them raping a man on video.
Trying to hide it behind the shields. Now
here's another example. Adam points this out. People
in Gaza
deserve death is what they say.
Not just Hamas, people in Gaza. And it
says a hard, agonizing death. There are no
innocent people there. Unequivocal.
And it's the same guy, mind you.
This is the most disturbing pictures I have
seen in a long time.
The pictures of the Gossens enjoying on the
beach.
Make sure you hear that.
That is what really pissed them off and
that's why this was put out as a
way to kinda go look and see, there's
no problem there. What you saw was a
bunch of gaz and peep children, everybody else
trying to find some moment of of not
pain on the beach on a hot day,
and they just couldn't handle that. And so
his problem, his point is that was the
most disgusting thing he's seen in a long
time, was them just not being unhappy
on the beach.
He says, and I linked to the other
pictures we saw yesterday. My point is, bro,
make sure you put these things together. That's
the same guy saying, no, he's a Hamas
guy. What you're hearing is that he thinks
they're all that because that is what they're
that's what a lot of them believe and
what they're taught to believe.
He says, which are even more infuriating and
hard on the soul.
That's hard on the soul?
People not being unhappy because you hate them?
These are disgusting people, guys.
And the pictures is and there are some
kinds of connection between these things.
Because while Yarden, some somebody's referencing, if only
for the fact that he was pulled by
his beard, I'm not sure what to say.
He wasn't kidnapped yet. His family wasn't killed
or kidnapped yet.
I I think he's referencing something happened on
October 7th. These people deserve death. So the
point is because of an image we saw,
they all deserve to die is what he's
saying.
A hard death, an agonizing death.
Instead, we see them enjoying on the beach.
There's no way to misunderstand that.
The children playing on the beach made him
so angry that he wanted to see them
have pain.
This person is this is the lowest
subhuman
problem we're dealing with. Not that has nothing
to do with his religion. It has everything
to do with the fact that he wants
people to suffer because they exist.
This is the problem right there. You're looking
at him.
Now on this channel, on the same, you
know, not the same show, but similar corporate
media, Israel media, the Israeli soldier who raped
the Palestinian alongside of the soldiers appeared on
channel 14.
Yeah. Because, you know, Matt Miller is telling
you, they're investigating. No. They've already let him
go. They applauded the guy. They let them
go. There's no problem here. But Matt is
lying to you. I'll show you that in
a second.
And to to defend his unit that committed
the rape.
Then god, by the way, he has this
cover on, but you can see his face.
He's already put videos out. The pa and
you can tell by the eye, it's the
same guy. The Palestinian was hospitalized with injuries,
including torn rectum, broken ribs, and ruptured bowels.
Disgusting. Here
is the guy.
Same guy.
He says, you feel they want to thank
you. There were days when they applauded us.
Israeli reservist, Meir Ben Shatrit,
arrested by Israeli military police for torturing and
sodomizing
Palestinian detainees,
described his arrest as a mere sham after
being released
hours later.
You think Matt Miller doesn't know that? This
disgusting,
also subhuman person who's rationalizing
rape
while acting like he cares.
He said that the officers even applauded him
for his actions,
and they only arrested him for doing
their work.
It's when you show it shows him acted
out.
I see the support. They're doing their job
because they have to give you a ticket.
God, it's so disgusting.
Applauded him, thanked him at the bottom of
their heart for raping a man.
This is all very real and easy to
prove and has been talked about in corporate
media in Israel. That's what he's up there
defending on that show.
There's just I mean, I go if there
there are a lot of people in this
world that don't want to believe this is
what's happening and that their government and lots
of the society are allowing this. But if
they are able to see it, like, shows
like this or clips, it'll forever change their
opinion of what's going on there. And that
is what they're so desperate to hide.
Here is another day afterward, or for it's
the same guy. Meir Ben Shittre,
Shittreet
was, according to Israeli media, the main suspect
in the ongoing sodomy rape case. In spite
of that, he was the first one to
be released after just 2 days of detainment.
Here's the video of him, June 2023,
while in reserve duty in the West Bank.
Quote, why can't we go in the Negev
machine in in with Negev
why can't we go in with Negev machine
guns? Yeah. That is what it says. I
thought I was reading it backwards. Why can't
we go in with mag machine guns?
Why can't we go in with holding force
of a grenade launcher to such places full
of terrorists?
2 days ago, all these terrorists were standing
there. 200 armed terrorists. Why don't we get
3 or 4 attack helicopters in the sky
and spray everybody? He's talking about Palestinian protests.
This video was posted on Telegram channel of
racist thug and right wing influencer,
Yov El Assi,
that went viral. After the video was circulated
widely,
Ben Chitritt claimed that the army is threatening
to remove him from service, yet the army
assured the press that he would not be
dismissed. And here's the video again of him
telling you that he got released and they
praised him for his act.
That is the easily provable reality.
Now
let's talk about the disgusting response from the
US government, including what I pointed out of
Matt Miller,
after this guy was released, telling you that
they're investigating this and it's ongoing and they're
gonna arrest people. No. They're not.
They're laughing at you and they are laughing
about how easy it is to control
villains like Matt Miller.
Here is Saeed asking Patel Patel
the same question.
And he go, oh, I'm not a legal
expert. Yeah. But I'm pretty sure rape is
wrong and illegal, Patel. But but you struggle
over that dynamic. This guy is increasingly
showing himself to be one of the more
ridiculous people in this conversation because his responses
are just becoming the same thing every time.
Sort of like Matt Miller. You know why?
Because they're caught.
And the police detained soldiers yesterday Mhmm. Or
the day before yesterday, suspected of raping a
Palestinian,
sparking protests and so on. Apparently, you know,
rape and killing and torture and all this
thing happens regularly
in Israeli detention camps. Does that constitute a
war crime to you? So the reports of
abuse are deeply concerning, and we 1st of
all, to always point out,
they the in in any context where they
works for them,
Russia, Ukraine, anywhere, they will speculate all over
the place. Don't forget Matt Miller was the
one that said, maybe they're getting raped in
in Gaza right now. But but everywhere we
don't wanna speculate. That's not what we're gonna
do. Only when it suits their interests. Everywhere
else, they'll speculate forever.
So what he asked right there was not
some, I don't want your rambling answer about
what I can't prove. He said, if that's
the case, would that be a war crime?
So, obviously, you can answer that. The game
he plays when he wants to where I'm
not gonna speculate,
it's just it's just that's what your job
is, man. You're supposed to give us the
disc the point is that they're asking him
point blank. If this happened, is it a
crime? The answer's obviously yes. Nobody with a
brain could answer no.
But he doesn't wanna answer. What does that
tell you?
So the reports of abuse are deeply concerning,
accordance with humanitarian law.
But they're not though. But they're not.
But we tell them to, but they're not.
We also I spoke a little bit about
this earlier in the week's side. We reiterate
the support that, an IDF,
that the IDF is investigating some of these
allegations of serious abuse. Nope. Already done. As
you're speaking, dummy, they've already finished. They let
the guy go, but let's pretend like you
don't know that. Of Palestinian detainees,
and that is, news that we welcome and
we're gonna let that process and we believe
in due process. Oh, we're gonna let it
process. We're gonna let it simmer for a
minute and we'll come back to you when
we have a better understanding. We can think
about it as I'm drinking coffee tonight, my
warm home, while they're being raped in prison,
but we'll reflect on that, Right? Let's just
figure it out. That's when we're gonna let
that process play out. Two quick points. My
god. Now if proven
to be true, that does constitute a war
crime, doesn't it? I'm not a legal expert,
so Are you serious?
You're not a legal expert
that rape might be a crime?
Really? I'd certainly I I imagine it would
be inconsistent with, is is Israeli law. Oh,
of course. It is a crime then. So
think about the way he has to work
himself into a pretzel to try to not
answer that. But you just did though. That's
really stupid. It just shows you how desperate
they're they're trying to step around everything.
Not for US interest. In fact, against this
hurts them to do this. It's only for
the interest of a foreign government.
Make sure you remember that. And so, of
course, that is why we are,
we've been clear that the treatment of, any
detainee needs to be consistent with international human
Right. So it's breaking the law. That's why
we keep telling them that we have to
make sure you don't break the law. And
then they continue to break the law, and
you and you ask, and you go, well,
we told them not to break the law.
So then they break the law. And you
well, we talked to them. We said we
don't don't break the law. It's just this
dumb recycling game that's that stupid. It's actually
that stupid. They just keep saying the same,
well, we raised the issue and we told
them, we we we make sure you act
with an inconsistent with the law. And then
every single day, they go out and break
the law everywhere they possibly can, and he
comes back and tells you, well, we we
raised the issue. We made sure we told
them that we can't break the law. It's
just childishly dumb. Like, at the very least,
come up with something else to say.
So here,
it's Matt Miller doing the same thing.
Ryan Grim asked him about rape and torture
at Sid Tiamen.
He says, on this rape and torture center,
which is what it is, how is it
still open? Does the US believe it needs
to be closed? Can you imagine the way
he answers?
Can you assume that probably that it's gonna
be the exact same cycling? Yes. It's exact
same thing.
On this, like, this rape and torture center
that seems to be pretty clear, all sides
seem to agree that horrible things are taking
place here. How is it still open? Does
the US believe that it needs to be
closed at this point and just So
we believe that all of the invest all
of the allegations need to fully investigated. Too
late. They already stopped, but that doesn't matter.
And anyone responsible needs to be held accountable.
I think that's the appropriate Nope. They already
let him go, and he knows that. Make
sure you know that. Be a first step
before moving to to anything else.
I guess, don't Right. So in the meantime,
with all the reports, all the verification, all
the media coverage, all the people on Israeli
media going, yes. We did it, and that's
okay. And we should be able to do
it. You're gonna let it play out? We're
gonna wait for them to not investigate, which
we already know they're not?
All that means is he's allowing more rape
and torture and human rights crime
war crimes to be played out, to be
to be committed.
And think about it. This it's one small
fraction of a gigantic
genocidal
venture agenda
right now. Everything. All the starvation, the bombings,
the killing, the rape, and torture, and pillaging,
and and disease,
and he just let's let it play out.
Let's wait for them to let us know
when we're allowed to say something.
That's the way that should read in your
mind. Well, what more than that? Wrap the
head. You.
Every time.
And, again, I'm sorry you have to be
forced to watch this stupidity.
Here is another one, same kinda point,
being asked about the same conversation.
The media today released,
a video showing Israeli soldiers raping a Palestinian
detainee at Sedita Men Detention
Camp.
The footage was very disturbing.
You I know you have commented on the
reports about this detention center before, but, we
have now we now have a new evidence,
which is video. Have you seen that video,
and do you have anything to say? Right.
So the point is it's proven
now. It's been talked about publicly on Israeli
media that this is rape. We know that.
They're on the point of conversing about whether
it should be happening.
This is how he responds. On that and
also the reports of, you know, rape Yeah.
From Israeli prisons. So we have seen the
video and reports of
sexual abuse,
of detainees are horrific.
They ought to be investigated fully. Ah, okay.
So we're just back to the investigation. Despite
the provable reality, the open conversation of how
it's happening, to the point of whether they
could should continue doing the thing we all
know happened.
And the investigation, which is already concluded because
they haven't charged anybody, the people have been
released.
Day by day, this continues. By the government
of Israel, by the IDF.
Prisoners need to
be treated.
Prisoners' human rights need to be respected
in other cases. And when there are alleged
violations There are. Government of Israel needs to
take steps to investigate those They're not. Who
are alleged to have committed abuses and, if
appropriate, hold them accountable. They're not. And Okay.
We well, there you go. Done. Done. Not
not not all the way through, which he
knows has already happened, but he'll just keep
saying the same things. We raised the issue.
We'll talk to him. We'll continue to we'll
make sure they held accountable. We'll circle back
once the investigation concludes, and it never happens.
My point in all of this is, you
know, everybody in this room knows that. Most
of them don't care, but they go through
this process day after day. And that's why
I think it was, Thacker from The Intercept
raised the issue about hiring for job. Well,
now and he he's done this, like, 5
times now. He's like, well, now it's been
6 months. Oh, well, we we talked to
them and we told them we wanna make
sure that human rights are upheld, that you'll
investigate and the investigation's ongoing. It's the same
stupid thing over and over. I hope these
people go to prison
because there's something especially evil about what the
the role that they're playing in all of
this. And it is appropriate that the IDF
in this case has announced an investigation, has
arrested a number of people. Nope.
Already done. To have been involved and, I
Alleged to have been involved. Speak to the
outcome of that investigation, but it ought to
proceed swiftly. And if they're It's already over,
Matt. Determined to be, in violation of criminal
laws or violations of the IDS code of
conduct, then, of course, gotta be held accountable.
Wow. Actually, this is not the first rape
incident we have been hearing Right. At Israeli
prisons. And Israeli human rights group, B'Tselem, on
Monday released a report
saying that Seydetaman is only tip of the
iceberg and that, you know, Israeli detention centers
turned into a network of torture camps for
Palestinian
Palestinians.
It recorded cited testimonies from 55 Palestinian detainees.
So,
I know Israelis,
are investigating this, but would you support any
mess independent investigation
into those allegations? So remember that report is
called Welcome to Hell, and it is a
Israeli human rights group.
Tip of the iceberg. Oh, I would have
to look at what the specific,
independent investigation people are calling for. And Oh,
so it doesn't it has to be your
kind of independent investigation. See, it has to
be a one that we though you don't
really want an invest independent investigation. You want
a controlled
false investigation.
That's my opinion, obviously, but I think that's
provable based on the fact that they just
lie to you about what's actually happening. And
pass judgment, on the merits. But, look, there
ought to be zero tolerance
for
sexual abuse. There ought to be?
I mean, is there, Matt, or there ought
to be? What are I mean, it's just
the
language they use. It's just it's all legality.
It's about trying to make sure you don't
trap yourself in something as you know you're
raping people, as you know you're allowing murder
and torture and everything else. It ought to
be.
No. It is, man. It is. And everybody
knows that, and we know it's happening. Rape
of any detainee, period.
That's a fundamental,
it's a fundamental belief of the United States.
And if there are
detainees who have been abused, if they Again,
what are you talking about? It is as
he's saying this, it has been roundly discussed,
proven, videos have come out as she they've
already addressed, proven to have happened. Or detainees
who have been
sexually assaulted or raped, the government of Israel
and the IDF need to fully investigate
those actions and hold anyone responsible accountable to
the full extent of the law. Just a
final one on that. You know, what is
your reaction to that,
Israelis, including politicians
and lawmakers,
protested actually the arrest of
Israeli soldiers who are suspected of,
abuse and rape. You know, we have also
seen comments from Israeli lawmakers trying to justify
the, you know, rape of Palestinians. Have you
seen those remarks? And so the point here
is that what he's calling on is those
people to investigate.
The same people that were protesting that they
should be allowed to rape. You know, the
thing that he apparently has not proven yet.
Despite the fact that they're literally protesting, they
should be allowed to do the thing Matt
says hasn't been proven yet.
These are the people that are supposed to
investigate. These are the authorities, the lee the
the politicians, po it's people of the military,
people that are prisoner. These are the authority
figures he wants you to believe are gonna
investigate and let you know the truth.
So, obviously, with respect to the last question,
there is no justification for rape of anyone.
As I said, there must be zero tolerance
for sexual assault of of detainees.
Okay. So right there, you can prove that's
not what's happening. As you have politicians who
are saying it's okay, as you have people
on the media saying it's okay, well, that's
clearly not zero tolerance.
But if he was asked about whether that
challenge is, well, we'd have to investigate. We'll
raise the issue. And with respect to comments
that have made been made by people in
the Israeli government or protests or attempts to
interfere with the judicial system, the military judicial
system
in Israel. Military. Our
our principle, the principle that we believe ought
to apply in Israel is principle that ought
to apply Wow. Anywhere in the world. Not
to do. Rule of law,
needs to hold. And What a stew so
he clearly got lost there. I I think
he he the point his his land the
answer is that the what ought to apply
is the rule of law.
Oh, yeah. We have to is that you
have to explain that to us that you
believe that the law ought to apply in
Israel? Like, think about the way that he
says that and how much that shows you.
That's wild to me.
So
we have seen the statements by the IDF
chief of staff that these investigations are important,
It's over. Gonna continue, and that is fully
appropriate. And let him out. And
they all know that. Sahid knows that. Everyone
in the room knows that. He's
called welcome to hell, the the Salem report.
Oh, he just he says welcome to hell
is what it's called, same point. Guys, people
are something special.
And I mean in a very evil disgusting
way.
Blows my mind.
Oh, there was one more. Shoot. I just
removed it. Hold on.
Wait. Is that the same one? Hold on.
Yeah. That's the same one. I just wanna
make sure it was I thought it was
so it's the second part of the other
video we just showed. But this is B'Tselem
posting this. Follow the account.
Israeli government has made torturing Palestinian detainees a
policy,
says the leading Israeli human rights group,
because of their own investigation, because it's been
provable. It's provable. It's proven.
Last,
here's what the
American Jewish Committee says.
So realize that this is this is on
the 29th July.
It is August 8th. Anyhow, let me just
make sure this this this post
from Beth Sillem and the rest of them,
this one's from August 8th, but these are
over the last so many days. So it's
been well past all of the in supposed
investigation, the release of the person responsible per
people,
and the declaration, and not and and again,
from Smotris and the rest, declaring that this
is okay.
And Matt's telling you that they're still investigating.
That's what he always does. Here on the
8th of July 29th, it says, we commend
IDF leadership for investigating concerning allegations against rape.
As the IDF chief of staff general Haveli
said, it's precisely these investigations that protect our
soldiers in Israel, the world. The
the point is, they've concluded this, and they're
going, good job. Good job in your investigation,
which amounted to nothing. It was a complete
sham as even the person accused was publicly
saying.
Just so it's grotesque, the perversion of justice
we're seeing and the fact that you're doing
so to protect rape.
God. Now just to wrap, I'm gonna I'm
we were at,
about 3. I want I'm hopefully to kinda
do this pretty quickly here to end. I'm
gonna leave off some of the foreign policy
conversation for next time.
Where Ryan Raspiani points this out, and this
is just to kind of give you some
points to end with to show you that
it's much bigger than these focal points as
you all well know.
Over 300 days, he says, and is and
Israel has done over 3,460
individual massacres
in with varying amounts of death, some of
them in the 100.
2 more
happened on 3rd. This post on 3rd. It's
been a week since this, some things I've
had pulled aside from, you know, over the
last week.
Burned alive in their tents.
A massacre unfolded at El Oxo Martyrs Hospital,
bombed tents in the hospital's courtyard. And this
is just keeps happening.
Using 10,000 plus you know, tens of 1,000
of dollar amount. I'm sorry to say that.
More you know, tens of 1,000 of dollars
worth bombs
to bomb tents that are a $100. You've
seen these memes floating around. There's not even
the allegations about Hamas anymore.
They're literally just bombing people in tents who
are trying to survive.
It's very clear what's happening. And and the
US just goes, how many more do you
need?
And a Asal Rad points this out. Remember
when bombing schools, school housing refugees was a
big deal?
She She's I remember when attacking hospitals, starving
children, and killing journalists was a big deal.
But not if it's Palestinians being killed. The
US has helped Israel normalize the worst crimes
against humanity.
And this is this is on the 3rd.
10 Palestinians were killed by a strike on
another school. That happens almost every day now.
Whether it's a school or in some other
location, housing displaced children, and women.
Javed
Abdelmonium
points out, I left Gaza the day before
yesterday, and this was on the 2nd August,
after 8 weeks of working beside my Palestinian
colleagues. He's from Doctors Without Borders.
He says, in my 1st week, I witnessed
the murder of Israeli forces of 2 fishermen
on the beach. One shot through the neck
and one shot through the heart, still holding
his cast net. There's multiple examples of this
of people doctors who spoke out about this.
I think it was also from, for I'm
blanking on the name off the top of
my head.
I forget it, but multiple doctors who've highlighted
who said the same thing. Who just where
they would just happen to be out there
one day and they watch them kill people
just walking down the street.
Yesterday, during the last sweep to the emergency
room, I walked in behind the curtain. There
was a little girl dying herself. She left
alone and I don't know who her family
who her family are. No one was there.
Her left leg was twisted, still being still
breathing, but she'd been left to die because
here, now, the system can't cope. And that's
the outcome. A little 8 year old girl
will lie dying alone right now in a
trolley in the emergency room. And now that
any other health system she would be have
been saved. Every day of July has been
one shock after another. That's that's his post
from Doctors Without Borders.
Kenneth Roth,
Israeli forces partially or fully destroyed more than
500 mosques in the strip since October 7th.
The
the the all these allegations at some point,
one or the other is shields or or
terrorists or whatever, and they don't even ask
to make claims anymore.
They're just straight up ethnic cleansing the entire
area. And you can see this. The evidence
is an overwhelming.
We've seen many of these kind of overlaps.
What this is is one of the supposed
safe areas in Rafa. Israeli army continues the
crime of genocide, Mustafa Barghodi writes, It is
ruthlessly destroying every part of Gaza. The video
shows Al Brasil neighborhood in South Rafa
before and after the invasion.
Before,
after.
Every single one?
Really?
It takes a special kind of
stupidity,
but
hatred
to believe that this is anything other than
genocide.
Franchesca Albanese
is also pointing out that it's not even
just in regard to Gaza or in just
in regard to people involved with what the
the it's West Bank illegal settlers who are
attacking anybody. In many cases today, also Israeli
Jews who just happen to disagree with what
they're doing. As she points out here,
the in the occupied territories, impunity is second
only to violence. In the past 10 months
alone, there have been over a 1000 violent
attacks against Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the
West Bank, East Jerusalem, supported or ignored by
Israeli forces. Palestinians have a right to be
protected
As part of their strategy to end the
Israeli unlawful occupation,
the UN should immediately deploy a protective presence
in occupied territories. Now that's it for the
Palestinians to decide. That shouldn't be decided by
some e you international entity because I argue
in many ways that could be abused. But
the bottom line is it's up to the
Palestinians to decide.
Now we've already played a clip of this
doctor speaking. He's a Jewish doctor who came
back, and I'm gonna play the other one
too. Here's another example. What we saw in
Gaza was unspeakable, he says. Children came in
with no back. The bullets have removed their
entire torso.
All over the world, you're hearing doctors continue
to tell you what they're seeing there. And
all over the world, you've got people blindly
trying to ignore it.
To play, what surprised me most was,
not the anticipated
effect of a £2,000
or a £500 American bomb being dropped on
a tent city, bombs that were designed
for busting bunkers in Afghanistan,
but rather how the carnage that was induced
really focused on children, health care workers, and
journalists.
Those that were the most innocent, those that
provided care, and those that would report to
the world,
the accuracy of the carnage
were specifically targeted.
When you say specifically targeted, can you go
into more detail
what you mean by that?
Absolutely.
We found children many workers found children, not
just myself, that,
had high velocity bullet wounds, sniper bullet wounds,
rifle wounds,
that were dead center in the chest. I
mentioned to other reporters that I couldn't put
my stethoscope
more dead center over a heart,
than the entrance bullet hole was.
There was no back to these children. The
bullet had, removed their entire torso.
There was,
a similar bullet hole in 2 of the
children's temples.
So they were shot twice.
Once was,
certainly,
a kill shot. The second one was when
they were on the ground.
And so no sniper hits a child, and
I'm talking toddlers,
twice by mistake.
And so, and that that finding was, duplicated
by many health care workers that children were
specifically targeted by high velocity rifle bullet wounds.
And then there was a plethora
of health care workers with horrible stories of
being specifically targeted.
And then, of course, journalists,
were either,
assassinated,
not allowed back into the country, or had
their equipment destroyed. Let me ask you just
about the the context of children,
being the majority of those who are suffering
here. UNICEF calls Gaza the world's most dangerous
place to be a child. They make up
90%
of those seen in the ER there.
Tell us specifically about 9 year old jury.
90%.
90% of the ER. This is a war
on children. This is a war on everything
Palestinian,
and the children are focused on.
Why why I mean, why does that not
surprise us? The clear reality of the focus
that the sociopathic, psychopathic focus on just murdering
everything they are.
The hatred for them, children included.
90%.
Who you treated?
Sure.
Juri, yeah, like you mentioned, she's a 9
year old girl.
She, along with her family, evacuated from Khan
Yunus to Rafa under threat.
And, when they got to Rafa, went to
her grandparents' house, that home was bombed.
Hers her grandparents were killed. Some of her
siblings were killed and the rest were previously
injured. We found her in the preoperative area,
actually, at European Hospital purely by accident.
And,
the wounds she had, I I don't wanna
go into the details on the air. Maybe
if if people wanna see pictures and and
read the details, they can read that political
article. But We're showing the wounds she had.
We're showing doctor Sidhwa some of the photos
he provided.
The the wounds were just horrific.
It's not something that, that anybody can actually
fully recover from even if she does manage
to survive, and she's thankfully in Egypt now.
Even if she does manage to survive, she's
gonna be permanently disabled for the rest of
her life.
And she's just one of thousands and thousands
of kids who are who are hurt this
way.
In it's
with the health care system under attack and
with the the health care needs of the
population so dramatically increased from what the any
system really could provide,
these children don't have much of a chance.
Just kills
me. Now, I'm not gonna play the other
one. I played it before, but it's, I
mean, that's the same point. The other one
just shows him, you know, he's happy. Clearly,
you can tell that he is emotionally distraught
about what he has had to see. As
a doctor. As a trauma doctor. And he
makes that point that no all the different
places he's been. All the different wars and
different, you know, areas of the worst kind
of violence. And he has never ever seen
this before.
Here is what,
colonel McGregor or is that yes. McGregor. Right?
That's what he said. Yeah. Douglas McGregor says
with judge Napoliano.
As Rania points out, the genocide and at
the cleansing of Palestine are old ideas,
but could only be executed on such a
horrific scale once the Israeli lobby took control
like it does now of America. That's what
she writes. Don't forget, Trump is on the
record with not too long ago, a radio
show saying that the Israeli government
had control over congress. It used to and
it should be. It and I think you
said, and rightly so,
but Biden stopped that, but we're gonna put
that back in place. They're paraphrasing. That's not
a joke. It's the same like anything else.
People that don't wanna hear that, well, that
can't be true. I've played it many times.
It's a very public and prominent interview where
he openly says this. Why can't people who
see, like, the idea that we're talking about
a foreign entity, China, Russia, influence and you
can hear him literally state that that government
should have control over our congress?
How is that possible?
This is an old plan
taken off the shelf, dusted off, and put
into action.
This is something the Israelis have wanted to
do for a long time, which is eradicate
what's left of the Arab population from Israel.
I've had more than one tell me privately,
you know, we should have done this 30
or 40 years ago.
Well, okay. But, you know, they they recognize
that that opportunity was passed. It was no
longer possible.
Well, it's turned out to be possible because
30 or 40 years ago, the Israel lobby
and its agents inside the United States did
not control the US government.
Today, they control the United States government. They
control the media. They control finance,
not just us, but also London
and much of Western Europe. And as a
result, they can impose discipline, and that's what
you're seeing in operation.
We are not going to walk away from
Israel. We're going to back them to the
hilt. So, yes, we're backing the expansion of
the Israeli state. No question about it. Now
here's what's important. This is a colonel speaking
from a military like, a military perspective.
Not about religion. Not saying the Jews control
the world. Right? The point is that this
is why that Zionist agenda has made that
so contentious because you're hiding what they're literally
doing. And, again, there are plenty other there's
a lot of Christian Zionists. It's the same
conversation. But to make it if you say
that, that somehow it's a trope about the
Jews, well, people for a very long time
have been scared away from pointing out that
obvious problem.
And it's it's make it about anything else.
It's make it about another political organization that
has influenced media, that has influenced all these
things and control our government. That's what's happening.
But just because they scare you away with
threats of antisemitism,
people have been so afraid to highlight these
provable realities.
And on top of that, you now have
people that push in the concept that, see,
he's telling you the Jews control the world
and they this is the problem.
There's obviously an overlap, but the problem is
that that is what's being used to hide
the larger issue.
And some people genuinely believe that. I aggressively
believe that they're wrong. But I think at
the end of the day, it's up for
you to decide. But realize that what he's
saying is unequivocally proven. That Zionists Zionist organizations,
as we're already highlighting, are influencing, infiltrating all
around the world. And hear it again. The
majority of Zionists in the world today are
Christian.
So as much as they try to make
that frame, you know, you say Zionist, you
mean Jew. That's not true. In fact, it's
quite the opposite when you realize the bigger
picture, but it does include Jewish Zionists. And
this is the conversation that's being fleshed out
all over the place.
Here's another example. Here's a holocaust survivor telling
you what's happening in Gaza.
Of taking sides is a question of being
concerned with the fate of humanity.
Palestine right now
is a focus, and it's a it's a
focus
for all that is troubling and threatening humanity.
There were studies of Palestinian kids done
over 20 years ago now
that showed them amongst the most traumatized people
in the world,
with mental health issues and behavior problems and
physical problems and post traumatic symptoms,
what can we imagine is gonna be the
impact
when so many of them are are traumatized
now, orphaned right now,
physically hurt right now
under the present conditions of the siege mentality
inside Israel. Until we have conditions of peace,
we can't even conceive of what healing might
look like. But if people are no longer
under threat
and no longer perceive themselves under threat, and
that
means ending the occupation, ending the apartheid, ending
the racism. We can't even talk about healing.
If you believe,
as Zionist propaganda would have it and tries
to drill into the heads of young Jewish
North Americans like I was,
that to be Jewish is to be identified
with this modern, highly militarized,
nationalistic,
and racist apartheid state, then, of course, any
criticism of that state by the transitive principle
will mean that you're attacking all Jews. But
then if you don't accept that premise, then
you're gonna forcefully
reject the notion that to criticize it is
to malign
the Jewish people. And the notion that if
someone objects
to starving an entire population,
murdering tens to hundreds of thousands of people,
if anyone objects to that, hates me, well,
that's actually an anti semitic
principle, and I,
I reject it. Meaning that what Zionism is
project putting out there is anti semitism.
Yes. That's why we put that to Zionism
is antisemitism. Zionism is the problem here. At
the very least, you must recognize there's a
lot of Jews like this person here who
are telling you clearly
that I do not agree with that. So
all these claims about one equals the other
are simply false. I mean, I don't even
know why we have to stress this. It's
objectively
easy to see. 1 is a so many
100 years old and one is or less
than that. 1 is 1000 of years old.
Joe Judaism is not Zionism. It's Zionism is
a political organization that has hijacked a lot
of things, one of them being Judaism.
Israel is a distortion
at best
of what Jewishness and Judaism are supposed to
be. It's a complete misdirection, and I see
it as the number one threat to the
safety and
physical and mental and emotional
and spiritual well-being of Jews everywhere.
Alright. Now the guy in the beginning, that's
that's, Gabriel Mate. That's Aaron Mate's father. Very
intelligent, very somebody you should look into. His
work is very important.
Now here
is what's currently going on for the people
of con units.
And I don't even wanna get it. I
don't even
the amount of times these people have been
displaced just since October 7th, this is
alone
is a war crime.
Not just because of the displacement. That is
part of it as well. That is a
war crime, but the idea of the torture
they're experiencing.
Look at this picture, guys. Look at this
video. As it says, it's like witnessing the
end of the world. Thousands of people in
Communist, southern Gaza are pouring into the streets,
not knowing where to go because they play
this game. And, by the way, let's be
clear. They were bombing where they were this
whole time. They have been everywhere else too.
But then they play the game where they
go, now you gotta move because we pretend
that we're now gonna now officially bomb where
we've already been bombing. So they push them
into the streets and many of them listen
because they, at least, they think they're trying
to do whatever they can to not be
murdered.
Some of them stay, they get bombed anyway.
They bomb them on the way, like we
see every single time. And they usually bomb
the place where they're going.
But they they're and they're laughing about it
the entire way, posting pictures, making fun of
the problem they're dealing with, and they realize
within this there are starving people, there are
elderly that cannot move, there are children that
are suffering from I mean, everyone suffering from
illnesses and skin rashes and everything else because
there's no water, there's no food, they're there
all being tortured,
starving to death, children dying as we speak
of of having no food.
This is what they're dealing with.
Now WikiLeaks also includes, and this is how
they're targeting these people, that the Israeli army
is using Amazon's cloud service. Not a big
surprise there. Another group to try to boycott
to store surveillance information on Gaza's population
while procuring further AI tools from Google and
Microsoft for military purposes.
Realize that Elon Musk has aspects that are
being used by the Israeli government. Elon Musk
was the personal invitee from Netanyahu to the
congressional
speech, where he lied to everybody, but they
all clapped for it, including Elon. 58 standing
ovations. They're all part of this problem.
And here's the US government.
Openly endorsing genocide. Interesting times we're in. This
is from 5th.
The visit by CENTCOM commander while all this
is going on. While the this is post
the rape epidemic
being exposed in the prisons. But they go
over and they take pic pictures and shake
his hand
while they're all supporting that.
It is a direct translation of US support
for Israeli action. The relationship between Israel and
the United States is unshakable. That's Gallant saying
that.
Using the US
to hide their crimes.
Not that that's even makes sense, because it's
how the US has committed an endless amount
of crimes around the world.
But at least they pretend that they're not
rapists. Right?
Now to end in general, I'm gonna play
this and talk about I'm gonna show you
some of the things we're gonna get into,
but I'm gonna talk about it in the
next show. It's the pre it's the it's
the main point about Iran and what's happening
there.
But just for time in general, I only
have a little bit left. But the this
is an important piece to understand. Kirk Wilkerson's
the one making this point. Now this goes
back a little ways.
I think, maybe it's 2017, I believe. But
this is discussing the 1st military base in
Israel.
And how problematic that was for Wilkerson at
the time, and what it show I mean,
it's another indication that we're just completely co
opted.
Again, I shouldn't say we, the US government
who's pretending to represent the people of this
country. That's the we.
Some of these Christian nationalists
have
zeroed in on some biblical prophecy that if
a certain
doomsday mindset doomsday mindset that cataclysmic war is
important for bringing back Christ? How can that
endanger US interests?
The mo Well, remember, the the interesting part
about this is from one side of this,
the Christian dynast argue and believe that once
the Jews are destroyed, that that will bring
on the end times. Right?
The other side of it is the Jewish
scientists believe that once the Christians are destroyed,
that'll bring on the end times.
Isn't that fascinating and terrifying at the same
time? And you wonder what they're doing, driving,
creating
from either side of it. And any whatever
you think they believe, which they've that's the
reality,
what it amounts to is the people around
all of that suffering. All of them. You,
your family, whatever you believe. Whether you're Jewish
or Christian or Muslim, doesn't seem to matter.
It's vivid
danger in all of this, I think, is
the special relationship
with Israel.
Christians United for Israel, John Hagee's group, is
a quintessential
example
of the danger.
They are looking for the US relationship
with Israel,
ultimately, to bring about Armageddon
and the rapture and Christ's 1000 year reign.
That's what they're there for.
I mean, look. What else do you call
that but but some kind of a cult?
Right? I mean, this is a terrifying reality.
I'm a Christian.
But the idea of pretending like you're going
to create like like, this is not something
that god is great. You are dry you
are manufacturing.
You are genetically engineering the red heifer. That's
what's happening. It's a public story.
Just like Zionists pretend like god chose this
for them, but really it was given to
them by Britain and they ultimately decided between
multiple locations. And any actual orthodox Jew will
tell you that that's not bringing that what
they're doing is is a bastardization of Judaism.
The point is the same thing here, that
this is about driving it to
to at least the illusion to be created
so then other people blindly think that's what's
happening and you're the one pulling the strings.
This is the same point we're making across
the board. Going back to a Sabbateanism kind
of concept and into Jew into, Zionism, controlling
or manipulating Judaism, Christianity,
same conversation. Adam Green and I had a
great conversation about this.
This is the first time that soldiers from
the United States are gonna be permanently assigned
to a base in Israel.
We in the military said
no to every president
from Harry Truman on. We will not put
a military base in Israel. If you order
us to, we'll quit.
Now we got a base there.
We got a base there. When Hezbollah has
the temerity to put a missile on that
base
or by accident,
we're in for a penny in for a
pound.
Or by a false flag, which is just
as likely as any of them. That base
is there, and Trump allowed that base to
go there. Trump did. So that as we
say in the military, if the really hits
the fan,
we're in it immediately because US
has been attacked.
The stars and stripes flies over that base.
That should really concern people.
That's this is and so the point is
that in the past, she's saying that they
all push back on this. They said, we'll
quit.
And more and more and more as colonel
Gregor told you, the influence became enough to
where they just made it happen anyway.
Now I'll include both of these just interviews.
This is David Ike interview. Zionist infiltration of
Judaism,
weaponization
weaponized migration and mainstream alternative media.
And then also include the one with Adam
Green, religious prophecies in Israel, Zionism versus Judaism,
and Abrahamic religions. It's an important conversation.
And I'll also play this clip.
This is from and then this is one
of the ones I've referenced before. It's easy
to verify.
This is Benjamin Netanyahu in the eighties.
We own the senate and the congress. America
won't force us into anything.
Watch it for yourself. It's just subtitles on
the bottom for the podcast. It is very
clear what's going on.
If you work dot com points out majority
of Americans oppose
using US troops to defend Israel,
but your government doesn't care. And we just
talked about this, I was not the one
Hold on, where was it? Right here.
US troops
to defend Israel.
That's happening. As even McGregor pointed out, 4,000
troops. This is not just the the
naval aspects. They have committed troops to go
on the ground and act in defense. And,
of course, if something actually bigger happens, they'll
deploy more.
Is this what you want, Americans? Is this
what you believe you're voting for if you
your vote makes any difference on this or
even makes a difference at all?
The majority of America deposed the idea of
US troops being used to defend Israel if
it comes under attack by Iran. According to
a poll, which of course can be manipulated,
it says support for defending Israel stronger among
Republicans with 53% in favor, only 32% of
Democrats.
It's just important to think about that. As
the results come as the Biden administration is
vowing to defend Israel from expected Iranian reprisal
attack. Realize, guys, this is something that they
initiated.
They just literally bombed Tehran,
attacking and
assassinating
somebody who was acting under the protection of
diplomacy.
Whatever you think of them, that's the clear,
provable reality.
Just like with Soleimani at the Iraqi airport.
These are this is terrorism, guys.
So just like I said before, as long
as you go, well, we're on the right
side so it doesn't matter.
That's that's sociopathic.
The point
is that they're saying we're gonna defend we're
gonna stand with them even though you're acting
in what Israel would call self defense.
US defended Israel from an Iranian attack in
April, which came in response to the Israeli
bombing of the Iranian consulate Damascus. Another one
responding.
The Biden administration intervened directly to protect Israel
and it's pledging to do so again. Realize
there are people like rumors of the world
who were saying, Iran's gonna attack in 24
hours. Well, it didn't happen. Like, a lot
of things they swear they know were gonna
happen. Or Biden's apparently dead. Or he's about
to be terminally ill. Well, here he is.
Just consider all these people that are lying
to you from a very aggressive partisan perspective.
Adam asked an important question. If World War
3 breaks out, there are 2 sides. Now,
obviously, this could be others. This but this
good question to think about. Russia, China, Iran,
Yemen, and North Korea, which I don't know
why. I don't think North Korea necessarily
necessarily possible, but I'm not seeing that. But
it gives you just frame it however you
want. Really, to me, it would be Russia,
China, Iran, Lebanon,
Syria, like, this this overlap. That makes much
more sense to me. But the point is
that side, then you have NATO, United States,
Israel, UK. There's more than that too. But
his point is which side do you stand
on? Well, here's my response, and I want
you to think about this. I stand with
the peoples of these countries who largely want
nothing to do with wars of elitist oligarchs
and technocrats.
But the point of your question is important.
Can we not see that we're being driven
to lean into the next phase of the
2 party illusion
on a global scale.
Now that doesn't have to mean that every
single aspect of this is all in unison.
But realize, guys, that my opinion has always
been, of all of them, that our governments
are the problem. I know that's a little
bit too much for so most people today.
But the idea being that if we end
up in a position where we're being just
driven to choose as we see the globalist
agenda driving, as we see all and, again,
despite all the narratives of the republicans somehow
finding that, you're seeing them driven in the
same direction as just by somebody pretending to
be on your side or by claiming that
I think this, and if it's the opposite,
it's true kind of a game, just blindly
being pied piper by Elon Wright of the
problem. That's republicans, not all conservatives.
But if we end up in that position
where the this is the it just becomes
the global 2 party illusion. And it doesn't
always only mean 2 things, but the game
is like a dichotomy in which you only
have selective choices, but there's many more that
you're not being given. And all of them
lead you in the same direction.
That's what I see this as. But think
about that. Think about the way that that
plays in the same way. Like, we all
see many people are con increasingly seeing through
their game.
This is just an extension of the same
thing in my opinion.
But I do. I stand with the peoples
of these countries, whether they are Israeli or
Palestinian,
who actually recognize that they don't want any
part of what they're driving you into.
Think of the realize who's actually driving all
of this.
Now, we will get into this in next
show. But Robert put out some amazing articles
in the last so many days. An Israeli
false flag could justify attacking Lebanon, and it
goes into the conversation, which is very easy
to prove, by the way, that what happened
there was an iron dome, either deliberate use
of it to bomb their own location of
Syria that they claimed is Israeli an illegally
occupied Syrian location, or it was an accident,
they still landed on Lebanon.
Here is an example of in March before
this, so it's a different time. It's before
this happened, but it's the same exact thing.
This is March and it's a it's a
video, very easy to prove. It's it's a
it was a publicly documented conversation
of exactly the same place, of Madal Shams
and the Iron Dome and a misfire and
how it fell on the village.
So all that's showing you is that how
very clearly this is something that could have
happened. And then we can prove to you
that it is what happened from a diff
much at different angles. But they pretended like
there wasn't even an iron dome that was
capable of this in the area, but, obviously,
that's not the case.
And then, of course, more suppression news breaks
this down showing you compare,
the explosion comparisons and really just more proof
and more evidence really that this is exactly
it's it's something the Israeli government was responsible
for. Then there's the clip of the person
who pretended to be from Adal Shams, a
a Druze member of the community going, we
need to attack Lebanon.
Except it turns out the guy was not
known by anybody there and they called him
out. They surrounded him and said, what are
you not? And the point is he turns
out to be a, guess what, person who
is chilling for Israel
just like we see the fake conversations everywhere
else.
This is, the area in the Golan Heights
where Netanyahu and ever and I think Ben
Gavir and others show no. It was Smotrich
showed up and acted like they were there
to support him, and they drove them out
and they said, you're not on our side
because that's the reality.
This is important, by the way. Barak,
Barak Ravid
wrote an article for Axios saying Israel told
the US that if Hezbollah harms Israeli civilians
as part of the retaliation, you know, like
Israel did to them,
it's military come they said the IDF response
would be
disproportionate.
Don't you just love the stupidity of these
people, the hubris?
That means I'm gonna commit a war crime.
That's what that means. The whole point of
proportionality
that they all creep try to pretend is
irrelevant to the guy, they're literally going, we're
gonna do the thing that makes that a
war crime. He's publicly telling you that.
But, of course, when it happens, they'll claim
you're a liar or a racist.
But this is just this is these people
are ridiculous, and how they ever influence people
blows my mind.
And he also wrote the article, Israel's unhinged
assassinations are a threat to global security.
It's a it's a great article.
We know that they are already sending their
show force to tell you they're gonna they
could defend this no matter what, despite the
fact that they're committing crimes, assassinations,
and occupation.
We talked about this on the show on
the second.
And I'll come back to this stuff. I
just make it fun of our Arson Ostrovsky
saying that if Israel should strike Iran should
strike Israel then we should fight back and
I just reframed it back at him in
the same way, showing you the lunacy of
all this. That ex if you're making the
case that his stance is that they have
a right, then it's the same way in
reverse. Since Israel already struck Iran that they
should not hold back in any Tel Aviv
at the same point. They just they it
only the point is it exposes that they
only think this makes sense or is allowed
when Israel is the one doing it.
And this is Jonathan Conrica saying, could it
be that the main reason for the delay
in the attack is that Iran
simply doesn't know how to fight by themselves?
Or that they know Israel will strike back
so hard. I'm like I'm like, is he
talking about Israel or or is he talking
about himself?
Or Iran or Israel? Like, think about it.
My point is the Israelis need to set
up a master class on political projection.
They have taken it to a whole new
level. Because what he's saying what do you
mean by themselves? Your argument is that Iran
is the one controlling the other groups. So
why would Iran need somebody else to fight?
The point is we all know the reality
of this. Anyone in the brain, even Israeli
analysts will tell you that they know for
that they cannot stand against Iran or Lebanon
or Syria without the US holding their hand.
And even then, they're failing. So this is
just them projecting what we all say and
laugh about because they're the ones. And on
top of that, that that you'll strike so
hard that how is that? What are you
talking about? You've already been shown countless times
to not even be able to wage or
the fact that Iran is able to fight
through your resistance in very easy ways in
regard to the resistance of your iron dome
if I point.
No they just they or the drones that
show that they aren't able to stop it.
The bottom line
is that Iran has been clear this is
about their measured response. They do this every
time. We're not gonna react belligerently with anger
like you all do. We're gonna wait and
do this when it's most important.
Start trying to goad them into responding. They're
not as stupid as you guys are. And
this is not about good guy, bad guy.
I think gover government is the problem. But
my bottom line is that Iran, it's it's
an objective reality. They've shown themselves to not
just take the bait, just like Russia.
Here on Israeli media, they're openly saying we
should preemptively strike Iran, showing you how irresponsibly
dangerous these people are.
Anastasia Marie Lupus, I think, got taken by
some fake information, saying Iran has now publicly
announced for the first time they've got a
nuclear bomb. And I just simply pointed out,
nope. That's coming from this is an old
conversation. They already tried to float back in
May. It's not real. It's been debunked already
and it's and the point is that it
didn't even necessarily happen the way they're claiming
it did. And even if it did, one
person saying that like Lindsey Graham does not
therefore prove it's happening. Realize, the IAE, the
International Atomic Energy Agency, and even US intelligence
have said that's not what's happening. This is
Israeli propaganda being seeded in the conversation
because they're desperate. But my point exactly, here's
Lindsey Graham introducing
legislation calling for a a strike on Iran.
Guy, this guy is a lunatic.
I think what I I think he's hedging
his bets. I think he knows this will
not actually be able to pass.
So he wants it to look like for
his his donors,
the people that fund what he's doing, to
think that he's doing this.
Here's the bill.
Literally bombing Iran's nuclear rather their their civilian
weapons, excuse me, civilian nuclear program as they
want you to believe it's a weapons program.
Again, it has been routinely proven by everybody
withstanding to not be that despite Netanyahu screaming
the same thing over and over. Mike Johnson
puts out a statement saying that the US
should declare war on Iran if it strikes
Israel, despite the fact that Israel just literally
struck Iran. That's how childishly stupid this is.
And now they're saying, here we go.
Iran is gonna attack
rather, they they wanna they this the point
is they're saying that,
a Pakistani has been charged with attempted assassination
attempts. I'm gonna I'm gonna get into this
more. I'd like the point is simply that
they're trying to charge this guy and everyone
made it about Trump. That's what the picture
is and everything. Except the point is the
actual conversation
guess what it says?
To carry out assassination attempts, but, you know,
potentially Trump. If you read into this, there's
literally nothing that connects us to Trump. Nothing.
And on top of that, I don't really
even believe this is what we're dealing with.
I believe this is some another manipulation.
You guys can look and do it for
yourselves. We'll go through more of this in
the next one. The bottom line
is they're driving this aggressively.
And and on top of that, you're seeing
reactions around the world like these Syrian groups
suddenly trying to take back what's rightfully theirs
because they see an opportunity. And guess what?
They have a legal right to do it
because they're occupied. They have a legal right
to arm resistance whether or not they were
attacked. They're illegally occupied.
But guess what the US is doing? Bombing
them because they are controlling their oil. That's
the reality. It's easy to see. They're they're
making sure they keep control of the oil
field.
That's not for democracy or justice, guys. That's
for straight up looting.
Jamie Dore points out the same point, and
then an officer points out that they're bombing
Yemen at the same time.
The US has dozens of secret bases all
across the Middle East. They don't want you
to talk about, but they're all getting attacked
right now.
We'll talk about that in a coming show.
Ukraine, by the way, is also launching incursion
into Russia. I mean, this just shows you
what they are supporting.
If if we're all pretending that Ukraine is
just fighting to take back what's theirs, why
are they in incur going into Russia? Or
why are they I mean, that okay. This
is not about bombing into the rush into
Russia, which in and of itself is an
incredible escalation that nobody wants to point out.
They're trying to take Russian territory.
And guess what they're using to do it?
Neo Nazi
Russian
volunteer groups.
Ukraine has supported
raids into Russia with these groups. Oh, so
you mean those Russian neo Nazi volunteer groups
that you kept telling us were all because
Russia likes Nazis? Oh, guess what? Now they're
on the Nazi side. The Ukrainian side supported
by the US government that is real. And
they're literally taking I mean, the point all
of these guys to end is just to
make sure you recognize that they are the
ones doing what they're projecting
to the world.
You know? Every accusation is an admission kind
of a thing. It's very clearly what's going
on.
They're acting like everybody else is gonna march
around the world and take over everything we've
done if we don't stop them while they
are explicitly not only doing that like the
US government but telling you that's what our
plan the Greater Israel Project, Azov Movement saying
we're gonna spread the white race around the
world as soon as we're done with Russia.
But don't listen to them, you're confused. Don't
look over there. But listen to what we
tell you Russia wants despite them explicitly saying
the opposite. And certainly maybe they think that,
but all you have is Israel telling you
that's what they want, wink wink, but we
can't prove that, and also Israel's lied about
damn near everything.
It's just embarrassing.
I know you guys can see it. I
know that people out there begin to see
it more and more.
The problem
is that it seems it's less and less
important that they have our influence
or rather influence us.
And that's because of this kind of shifting
dynamic. And I think the whole point of
what's happening is to drive us to a
place because they see the shifting, the change,
to where we no instead of where it
just no longer matters
what we think at all,
which is exactly where they've been trying to
push us for a long time. Once you
get into this kind of technocratic panopticon, the
point is, well, it doesn't matter what you
think anymore. If you go afoul of what
we tell you to think, well, you're shut
off. You're suppressed. You're arrested.
I believe this is what they want, and
I believe this is clearly laid out. Israel's
doing it already.
So, hopefully, this will inform some more people
that we can reach some new people with
this
information. Tomorrow,
I don't I might not I mean, I
always leave it open for the possibility that
I'll be able to get a show out,
but the point is tomorrow, I have 2
interviews that I wanna play. And that might
take up most of the time, but I'm
gonna try to also do a show just
because, again, I can't my point is I
I really am trying,
you know, not even just because I'm saying
it, but because I want to. Every day,
I'm trying to get something out. And it
just I'm just constantly bombarded with things that
are happening around the scenes, around all of
this. And and then on top of that,
I've been scheduling interviews, which I really should
put on pause right now because that then
takes more time. The point is the daily
wrap up, I find to be important
because of the the focal point, the the
what we're covering, the ongoing, like, day to
day coverage. Because frankly and it's not I
don't you know, I'm not trying to pat
myself on the back, but I think that
the the way that we are looking at
these things and the and the the framing
of it and the way that the comments,
I think I just don't see many out
there doing it. There are some, plenty, but
just not the ones that are getting enough
attention. And so when I fail to get
to these conversations, things fall through the cracks.
And I can't cover everything, I know that,
but it's hard
because some of these things I really do
find important. So all of that's to say
that I'm gonna do my best to get
to it tomorrow. And I promise you, it's
we will get back on track to where
I can do this like I was at
least before 4 to 5 days a week
at minimum.
It's important to me.
But
there's oh, by the way, these are the
things I'll get to I'll be getting to
I mean, there's so much going on right
now, but the the substack conversation I mean,
I'm really struggling even to get anything going
on there but I promise you I haven't
forgotten about you guys. And I would I'm
not gonna be insulted if you decide to
take your your your donations away from that
because I'm not meeting the founders' conversation, you
know, metric and so on. But I will.
I promise that's gonna come back to reality.
But
just, you know, just one guy back here.
I can only do what I can do.
I only have so many hours in the
day. But those thank you all for out
there for continuing to support this platform.
I mean, we couldn't do this without you.
I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.