Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Friday, August 2nd, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
It's gonna be a long show. So sit
back,
gather
around, get what you need,
popcorn drinks, you know, whatever it takes to
sit down for a 5 hour show, which
I'm kinda kidding, but we'll see what we
get to today. I plan to talk about
a lot.
A lot to cover from the last couple
of days,
from many different ongoing situations.
And I had a bunch of stuff that
a lot of times when I've got these
longer shows where I know it's gonna be
a lot,
I try to put aside some of the
things that might not be as time sensitive
or more towards, like, the kind of culture
war, you know, 2 part different points that
I think aren't as important as the kind
of pressing immediacy of different world events.
But today, I decided to include those as
well as my point. And I think I
wanna talk about, you know, I find as
I've said a lot of times over the
years, a lot of times I see that
there are
almost without trying, I I line things up
that seem to all kind of interconnect in
certain ways. And then I yeah. And it
be when I see that pattern, I try
to kinda line it up that way. And
so a lot of what today kinda feels
as I think a lot of people are
sensing. A lot of these things are interconnected,
which, honestly, I think it's because it always
really is. I think a lot of the
bigger parts that we
see tend to tie back into some larger
agenda.
It's well beyond
outside the 2 party paradigm scope or, you
know, control
or reality. Or, again, the point being that
at the at the main point of this,
that doesn't really exist. There are clearly people
that identify as republican and democrat, conservative and
liberal, and they, you know, believe these things.
And that's not right or wrong. That's their
that's their choice with what they believe. The
point is that the people above that, the
power structures,
use those things against us. And, again, these
are just labels. Whether you're a Christian or
a Jew or a Muslim or Republican or
Democrat, these are things that they go, okay.
We can use those
ideologies and the beliefs
against them or against others.
That's not everybody. Clearly, there are good people
in the world, but this is a very
basic thing to understand.
So the 2 party illusion
is called that by a lot of us.
The 2 party, you know, manipulation paradigm, whatever,
is the idea that we have the reality
of these
different differing parties and then we have the
power structure that uses what you think you
believe or rather what you believe to manipulate
you into thinking what they want you to
believe or drive you toward agendas that they
think are in their interest,
usually at your expense.
And I think this is something that a
lot of people are highlighting right now that
hopefully is much bigger than just these, you
know, current situations. But as I think we've
talked about over the years, because it's only
one power structure or, you know, varying power
structures that are all driving towards the same
agenda or using the same things to drive
towards their agendas,
My point is that this tends
to oscillate
between what side seems to be focused on.
And it's always varied. It's always, you know,
all of us, I argue. But right now,
it was sort of during COVID 19, it
was quite obvious that the right saw that.
And I say that as just, like, the
larger grouping of all those things. People that
lean that way
more so saw the problem, at least in
my experience. Now, of course, this could be
different to you.
Now as I've said before, I see that
going the other direction in a much faster
way than usual.
And I can't stop recognizing how obvious it
is that there are people who are within
that that are being played right now.
From moment to moment, whether we're talking about
Israel, whether we're talking about the Venezuelan coup,
whether we're talking about digital IDs, It's it's
just like one after another, the dominoes are
falling where
I'm not sure if the larger conservative base
is falling for it. Some I frankly, I
don't think that's true. A lot of them
watch this show. A lot of you are
watching right now. And I I love that.
I'm not you know, my point is that
I think those that do, that can see
that recognize that I'm not calling to one
side or the other really. I'm just speaking
to everybody about truth and what we can
prove and that should that should resonate with
anybody.
Or I think a lot of them are
seeing it. Like, a lot of the liberals
are seeing that. I mean, the point is
that
they're seeing that the larger people above them
in in in the
structure of the Republican side of in this
part of the conversation
are actively
using
just about anything at their disposal to get
you to fall for these things. And it's
not really working. It's working in some degree
to some degree.
But I think that is causing more and
more chaos.
And this kind of a long winded simple
way of saying just that the the the
awakening of people that, again, was try essentially
tried to be co opted by both sides
to all of this is causing this to
become more uncomfortable for everybody.
And that's a good thing as much as
it may not feel that way because we
need to make that happen to to have
anything different than what we've always had. And
I think today's show is really about trying
to piece all that together, and we'll get
into the bigger topics. We're gonna talk about
the ongoing Venezuelan coup and how that very
clearly ties in with Elon Musk and the,
you know, digital coup taking place on Twitter
that's aimed at driving Republicans to achieve this
for any number of other things that I
think is
obviously not be rooted in reality. I will
go over all this around the long term
agenda left and right about Venezuela,
all of the things the lie the I
mean,
as it's it's on par with what Israel
was doing. Just multiple lies a day being
caught, deleted, rechanged,
just over and over. Elon Musk sharing most
of them, getting 45,000,000
views on on things that are verifiably false.
He has a right to do it, but
it shows you how dangerous this is in
regard to how the paradigm is used.
We're gonna talk about Iran, the assassinations of
both leaders in in Hezbollah and and Hamas,
and the
just incredible illegality of all of what's happening,
whether or not you think all the lies
they say about these people are true. It's
still illegal what happened and how that's being
driven
to war
at your expense. And the United States government,
now the the White House, I should say,
Very different to all these different things mean
today, but I do see it as one
entity. But realize that there are different factions,
but the gov the White House press release
has said that they are going to be
deploying troops.
Defensive
units, of course, but
but, I mean and let's also be clear.
Boots have been on the ground for a
long time in all of these locations,
regardless of what they say. And we've proven
this 15 times over.
And it doesn't and just because there's they
define it as a certain thing sort of
like Kirby's large,
operation
only meant when there was lines of people
marching. It's just this ridiculous
definition that means that whatever we don't want
it to be, it's only this one thing
we create. The point is the boots on
the ground, it means exactly what it sounds
like. Military people on the ground,
whether they're in defensive capacity or not. And
my point is that even when they're not
or they are, I mean, it it goes
both ways. It always has. We saw this
with the peer. My point is that, yes,
they're deployed. Yes. There are American troops on
the ground. There's also UK troops, troops from
all over the world
taking part in a genocide
that we all can see. That's how crazy
this is. A lot of what we're talking
about today ties right back in with Israel's
desperate agenda to change the conversation and maybe
just not lose everything that they've built in
their apartheid state. And that's not everybody in
that country. Not every Jew, not every Israeli
but clearly the vast majority of their government
and unfortunately a majority of their population.
But we're also gonna talk about the 2
party illusion in a larger sense, and a
lot of other moving parts around this that
I think are very important to get into.
The
large scale
illusion that's taking place leading into this next
election or selection, as you know, I think.
I guess I'll leave there's a few more
things that I would wanna get into there,
but I I let's just leave it there
before we start. I'm gonna
possibly leave out some stuff.
Just so you guys can see, I might
skip things today. There just there's a lot
that I've lined up, so I just wanna
give you that heads up now. I'm gonna
try to go through this reasonably quick so
it's not as long as it might be,
But we might see some things skipped. So
let's get into it. Oh, and there's we're
gonna talk a little bit about Trump's conversation
again. Not as much as before, but the
the ear overlap and these different things that
are coming out. I don't know. It sounds
dumb to say that, but the reality is
it's interesting.
And I don't know how it's not obvious
to everyone in the world that there's a
discrepancy
with an injury that doesn't exist. And I
it's it's really interesting to me, but I'm
not jumping to conclusions. There's plenty of things
that could make that make sense, I would
argue.
But it's weird how nobody's engaging with the
Ronnie Jackson statement of 2 centimeters and all
these different things that just don't make sense,
and I'll go through that again today.
And, I think that was generally it, but
other points we'll get into to start. But
I wanted to give a shout out to
a interview or rather a show that Corbidge
put out.
Honored as always to be a part of
anything that he does. Episode 463, the Gaza
Holocaust.
Now he's gonna get heat just for calling
it a holocaust, but that's quite literally what
the word means and absolutely what's happening.
And, I think there's 2 parts in here.
I think he goes back to an older
interview we did and also we, we talked
recently for this show in general, But make
sure you're both following
his work, Corbin General or James Evan Pilato
for new old next week and everything that
they do. They get
far less attention than they should. Let's put
it that way. Amazing work always again, as
I've said many times, Corbett is is easily
the one of the main people that is
responsible
for why I'm doing this today. So make
sure you check it out. It's a great
show. It's great information.
I also wanna point this out.
You know, often I'll put these out and
say hashtag false flag watch. For those who
don't know what I mean by that, it's
really just saying this looks suspicious. There this
has all the kind of hallmarks of what
we might expect. Doesn't have to mean that
it is. It's just it's throwing it out
there online, say pay attention to this. Let's
see how this goes. This may be something,
maybe it's not. You know, that's it's all
it is. I just wanna want people to
pay attention to it. So here I put
this out under hashtag regime change watch. Same
exact point.
And just be and you'll see exactly why.
Now the the gold and gold backed currency
is not I mean, it may not even
be the primary reason we've seen this in
the past. But it is a valid reason
like with lib Libya, Goldbactinar, and other point
points we've made.
Never is that the only reason. But so
be there
people always wanna make it about one thing.
It's the oil. It's this. It's the lithium.
It it's usually all those things, and this
is one of them.
WarWatch point this out. President of the transition
of Burkina Faso. I I mean, a long
long term
occupied, manipulated
western,
you know, by the west entity for all
for resources and the same old things we
see from everywhere else.
His name is Ibrahim Tarore, I believe, probably
pronounced a little differently. Quote, he says, there
will be no more exporting of gold
to foreign countries for processing.
Like, they would need that anyway. I understand
this is the whole ploy that well, of
course, we'll help you take your gold away,
process it for you, and give you back
scraps or really whatever else we decide. This
is the point we always talk about. With
these countries,
they're the ones that have the wealth. They
can
easily, without anybody else's help, use that wealth
to manufacture, process, and do whatever else they
need to do. But it's like this in
every other country that the west, primarily going
through history, the US and the UK have
done, which is where they occupy territories acting
like they're helping them at least in the
modern times where we started to care about
these things. Before, they just did it and
didn't didn't care.
They would they then act like they're helping.
And the point is they, as we've said
before, cause them or force them really through
financial and other forms of coercion
to to basically outsource what they need to
the United States. So the United States is
then responsible for
selling them at a markup everything that they
would otherwise already make in their country that
they would need to survive. And then they
turn their entire resource or,
industry
in this country
to aiming towards what the US needs.
Right? So then you get in this position
where you end up it's sorta like all
the monocrops in this country. Like, it's like
that's what they become. They have to they
just make the thing they need and then
if they need to, the US pulls that
rug out, then they're screwed. They're stuck with
their entire industry pointed towards other interests, and
they can't make take care of themselves anymore.
And then we stand back and wonder, gee.
Why are they like this for 45 years
or a 100 years? Because they make it
that way. And then when they want to,
they can turn around and say, look at
how bad they are. They can't even take
care of themselves. We have to be here.
It's just so disgusting all these this is
my point as always, pretending to be the
honorable, altruist one while doing the exact opposite.
That's worse than the worst. That is the
worst there is. You are terrorists, but pretending
you deserve praise for your terrorism. So the
point is, watch out for this because I
get a very I mean, as I think
anybody would call out
as he goes on to say, Burkina Faso's
gold will be used to back up the
country's currency. Sorry, that was the main point.
Not only are but it's both really. The
idea that they're gonna pull back that resource
which I guarantee you off the top of
my head, I mean, what? France and others
that are clearly immersed in this are going
to care about that. They're going to lose
because of that, both as a government, but
also the oligarchy that wildly profits from these
things because they're immersed with the government, the
whole fascist overlap.
Then you have them backing using that gold
they're not gonna let them take and make
their own gold back currency. Now clearly, it's
not as simple as this quick overview,
but the idea being is that's going to
upset very serious powers in the world. And
you may see and it doesn't even have
to be related to the larger agenda. It
could just be a government out there that
decides to push this and try to put
themselves back in that power. So, regime change
watch. That's now I thought that was important
though to consider how else these things happen
in the world, and how easy it is
for them to just
manufacture some narrative about how they're funding terrorism
and look at that. We don't even most
Americans don't even check these things anymore, or
the world for that matter. It's not unique
to Americans
because we get so caught up with bigger
things and rightly so. I mean, look. I'm
not gonna begrudge an American for caring more
about what they're dealing with than something else
across the world. But the point is that
we need to realize that this all comes
back to you, always,
Because you're the one paying for it, as
much as we try to pretend otherwise.
Now, I wanna quickly point out a few
things about COVID 19 and medical health before
we get into a point that overlaps with
both that will lead us into the 2
party illusion point.
And this is, of course, calling somebody out
that I feel like I have to. They
oh, I I, you know, I've more so
done that late more than usual late. But
and you in the past, I tried not
to because I just don't like the the
conflict of it all. But at the end
of the day, right now, I can't stop
seeing how this is building
very alarmingly
into ways where and I'm not talking about
Camus. He's doing great work. I'm talking about
what we'll get to next.
This building problem where
far too many are falling into it because,
you know, well, that kinda is what we
think is happening. Right? So we can just
lie about that. We can say this is
what they're gonna do and then you look
into it. Well, that's not even actually what's
happening, but we know that's kinda what is
going to happen or what they're building towards.
And I I mean, I'll be the first
to report 90% of this stuff. Right? They
whether we're talking about some kind of a,
you know, forced vaccination, for example, or any
number of things. Right? These are not false
conversations.
But if I were to come out and
say, I don't know, that the FBI has
said that they're going to physically vaccinate everybody
whether they like it or not. Well, is
that real?
Well, no.
But it's not too far from the truth.
Right? So if I just kinda made up
all these things and pushed it out there
and said, you know, well, I'm lying for
my truth. Right? At least by lying about
this, you might get someone to look at
what is really happening, which is they are
forcing these things in very coercive ways and
maybe it even goes to the level of
forced vaccination in some locations.
No. It's not inaccurate. Right? But the statement
is false.
We should care about that. Now you'll see
what I mean when I get to it.
I just felt like I wanna say that
there.
The reason this is so important is because
I argue that the media I'm talking about
are either doing this deliberately
in order to hide the truth behind flamboyant
claims that are in fact false, which is
exactly what happens by anybody with a brain,
or that they just don't care, and that
they're grifting out there using false information on
top of the truth to manipulate you in
ways you kind of already expect. Maybe even
that will later come to pass.
But that's just as problematic, you understand. Now,
before we get to that, Kamas is highlighting
an important study.
And this is just I mean, this is
I mean, he he keeps doing these which
is import which are important.
Just this constant flow of, oh, that thing
we said 4 years ago? Yeah. Here's another
peer reviewed study proving that it is happening.
Which is just kills me because there are
plenty of people that did not see this
even though it was all there. The evidence
was there, the pure feed science was there,
the famous scientist and doctors in the world
were calling it out, of course, then they
got censored for it. But it was all
there. It just show and the same thing
we're gonna get into, whether it's Venezuela or
anything else. It's all there for you. If
you just look
with the discerning eye and don't fall into
the partisanship,
consider everything, question all.
His point is a major new peer reviewed
study has been has found that COVID 19
mRNA shots are responsible for the surging numbers
of people being diagnosed with, guess what, Alzheimer's
disease.
Neurological disorders. You know, like Prion's disease. Remember
that? One of the earliest studies that got
so aggressively shouted down. I'll show it to
you next.
Here this is from SLEY News. And thank
you as always, Kamis, for posting the link.
Doing good work. Here's the study.
A potential association between COVID 19 vaccination
and development of Alzheimer's disease.
And it gets into the main points.
Simply saying, those receiving these shots within 3
months of the vaccination, those findings showed an
increased incident of both of these things. The
mRNA you know, get into the the the
percentages of it.
Preliminary evidence suggest a potential leak between these.
The point is, guys, this is not new.
This is from December 2020. We I remember
talking about in 2020, like, right when this
came out, like a lot of us did.
COVID 19, RNA based vaccines. I said this
was so early that they were just going,
look. And the only based on these things,
RNA based injections
and the risk of prion disease. And it
was very clear because, specifically, the folding of
the TDP 43 and FUS into their pathological
prion confirmations is known to cause ALS,
front temporal labor degeneration,
Alzheimer's disease. Look at that. And, of course,
what happened? Do you remember? This this is
on the,
oh, she
I thought it was I thought this was
the archive version. I guess not. But this
was pull this was forced to essentially be
I forget if it was taken down or
if they had to put out a statement.
They just dismissed it entirely.
It was one of the earlier ones that
came out ahead of everything and they just
shut it down. Imagine how many lives could
have been altered, saved, if they had just
said, yeah. That's that's some good work.
But, you know, we're making billions and we
kinda wanna kill you all, so let's just
shut up about it. Sad. It is very
sad. So here's all the studies. Again, as
always, you can read it for yourself, you
can check it for yourself, peer reviewed.
Guess what? You're not gonna hear about this
on co on corporate media.
Surprise, surprise.
And I also put this out recently. This
is interesting.
This is a tweet from this I don't
even know. I'm not familiar with the account.
What's weird about this to me, senior scientist,
vaccine research and development, he put this out
going, woo hoo, hooray, it's huge, we got
a nasal COVID 19 vaccine. It's like,
really man? Like, it just like it kills
me. How am I like, I don't know
why. Like, you realize this is all this
is just stepping stones on this is a
building block on top of the failing system
we just came from. There this is exactly
what we're mourning about and that's why I
posted this. The the show that I did
back in 2023. And this is from Pure
Food Science. I believe it was MIT actually.
And they're the ones selling you this. New
aerosolized mRNA
delivering nano particles, that's what they're talking about,
can, quote, vaccinate or they can eliminate.
That was their study that pointed this out
that they can be used to deploy what
they would call vaccination, which is a stretch
of the imagination,
or it could be used to shut your
body down. That's what that's why I said
dual use.
So my point was I shared this going,
like, come on, guys. Like, well, at least
consider that this is a problem, and also
recognize that this means they've always known that
mucosal immunity, like doctor Bakke was screaming out
in 2020 that they still won't listen to,
was the only way you could stop whatever
they're talking about. They knew that back then,
but still gave you something to inject in
your shoulder muscle, which they claimed would stay,
but it didn't. It circulated your body. And,
guys, we're being lied to you from day
1.
These are these are basic things that Bakke
was saying. They all know this. You cannot
have immunity for a respiratory virus if you
put something in the shoulder muscle.
And guess what? He was right. It's amazing
that these basic things are still not discussed
as a central point in the conversation.
But what I thought was interesting is that
this person then weirdly
put their stuff behind a block. I I
literally think it was because of what I
shared, which I think is funny. Now you're
unable to see it. They won't let you
see it. But this one's still there just
because it's, oh, watch. I'll refresh it, and
it'll be gone.
Oops. Now it's gone. And all it was
saying was exactly that. It was breaking story
about some new vaccine. It's just strange, isn't
it? And then I posted this so you
can see it because he's hiding the tweet,
you know, so you can't see it. A
new nasal COVID 19 vaccine blocks transmission of
the virus. Well, I remember how well that
went last time. Remember when they said it
blocks this and it stops that and it's
a 100% effective? How'd that work out?
They love to say that in their studies
based on flimsy information using non placebo vaccines
as their, you know, all the same stuff
we can go into. And just I don't
know why we'd be trusting this. Now I
wouldn't blindly dismiss it either. I'm open to
whatever ends up being put out. I haven't
seen ever more than just this study. But
based on that and what we can look
at, it has all the same things. It's
all the same problems we've already talked about.
I don't know why anybody would lean into
this at this point.
Now on that note,
I wanted to get into some of the
misinformation that is everywhere all the time, especially
from this platform.
Now, this platform that's the people's voice or
whatever, I've pointed this out more than once.
And I'm gonna make a real point about
this, guys, because I it seems it's it's
frustrating
that there are good people out there that
get pressured into this by the community
Based on exactly what I'll show you.
So he puts this out August 1st, you
know, with, you know, 300,000
views. Right? They they get, you know, far
less followers on their account, but yet gets
twice 4 times as I mean, way more,
like, 10 times as much reach as we
do on this platform. Surprise, surprise.
And again, while provably sharing false information pretty
much all the time. Now it's usually built
around some level of information that is provable,
but it says Bill Gates and WHO call
for military to round up mRNA vaccine refusers.
Now before you I can read the rest
of the title, if you think that sounds
familiar, you should because it's been posted many
times.
This I mean, verbatim the same title in
the past under COVID 19 conversation, and it
was fake back then too. But this time,
during blur bird flu bird flu pandemic.
Okay.
So the point is now let me be
clear about this.
The idea of forced vaccination is is already
happened in in select points in throughout the
COVID 19 illusion.
The idea of other countries, I think it
was the last one was Australia, if I
remember correctly, having legislation that shows that if
they wanted to, that they could justify forcing
certain people.
Now I'm gonna show you a New Zealand
proposed
legislation that has not yet put put into
effect for coming, in the 20 put in
2024 about that same point. All that is
very real. I've never just I mean, if
you watch my work, you'd already know this.
My point is, has Bill Gates and the
WHO openly called for military to do anything?
No.
You you can look into it for yourself.
I'll show you the video where this is
the video this is about the level of
Matt Wallace I've showed you in the past.
I'll play this video for you, briefly skim
through it, and show you how it's nothing
but this statement,
a clip from dot from Peter Hotez saying
that that's what he thinks. That's what this
is all based on. Hotez is a maniac.
He does not represent Bill Gates or the
WHO.
Clearly, there are overlaps, but those overlaps are
not there for me. And if he says
it, that's what Bill Gates and WHO have
called for.
The fact that I even I already the
fact that there are probably people already listening
going like, you know that's what they want.
That's not the point.
Well, I mean, here's the let's just even
say Bill Gates stood up today and said,
this is what I think we should do.
That still would not be the same as
Bill Gates of the WHO
calling for the military to round up mRNA
vaccine refusers. That's what it says.
It's intentionally
hyperbolic,
but people take this at face value, and
then they post it and they run with
it, and people then have this in their
mind. And anybody that comes in and goes,
wait a minute. We should be very concerned
about this potential reality and here are cases
where it's happened, but that's not exactly the
truth. And read the comments. You see what
the people go, you're you're fighting for the
WHO. You're on Bill Gates' side, you know,
despite the fact that we literally
hosted the,
what was it called?
I'm now forgetting what it's called, hold on.
The Bill Gates. Derek Derek is the one
that put this together.
It was the Bill Gates
web
Let me see, it's loading.
My point being is that, you know, those
that would jump to those conclusions, the reality
is we've done more work on hashtag expose
Bill Gates than most.
Multiple series on the reality of what he's
doing. You get my point. So
where were we?
It says Bill Gates has joined forces with
the WHO
in calling for vaccine refusers to be rounded
up by the military and force jab with
mRNA. Like, just to be clear, he's not
saying this is what might happen. This is
what we say. This is saying as a
stated fact that they have joined together, which
they work, overlap, and they work on all
sorts of things, which is clear, but then
called for those things. Hasn't happened, guys. Didn't
happen last time. It didn't happen right
now. Gates of WHO have ordered governments, ordered
governments to lay the groundwork to mobilize the
military. This this is all based on Hotez
saying that's what he thinks we should do.
I'm not kidding.
And I simply said, just making stuff up,
I see. Awesome.
Obviously I was a little frustrated the other
day because the trolls go everywhere.
You know, but a little more con confrontational
than I usually am.
But you'll see the same kind of stuff
beneath the, you know, the way that people
respond and I think I've got one right
here. Oh, it doesn't even matter. It's not
wasting time on it. But so this Michael
Yon shared this. This is open war, you
know. And some of the stuff you share
is good. But it's the problem is it's
based on fake
information. Here's Jim Ferguson sharing it from the
People's Voice website.
So just listing it off.
You know? And engage with large accounts. Like,
it blows my mind. I get it. Where
the idea that this is something that they're
capable of, I don't think anybody would deny.
But doesn't it matter to you guys watching
out there? I know it is to most
of you that this is false, that they're
literally making up claims to scare people into
whatever they're trying to accomplish. Whether and, again,
I genuinely think the larger reality is probably
to hide what this is. To hide the
very real possibility.
Because people like that have are honest and
objective are gonna read it and go, oh,
come on. Well, I know that's not true,
so why would I read even further? Right?
Because that's probably what happens to a lot
of people. Or you get people that do
care spreading fake information to people that know
better and go, well, you're ridiculous.
And it causes that strife. It causes the
division.
You can tell I care about it, guys.
It's a problem. So this I'm telling you,
do you spew go through this website,
any one of these, you'll find numerous subjective
floated claims that you can prove are incorrect.
So you'll see my point as we go
through this. All it's saying is Gates the
same thing. They've ordered the governments to lay
the groundwork, repeated, which is not true. Gates
and doctor Tedros of the globalist world WHO
have announced a new project to turbocharge the
development of distribution of mRNA. Okay. So here,
by the way, is not the same thing,
and this is not even directly from them.
This is
a mRNA bird flu vaccine development
WHO. They've announced Monday a new project to
accelerate the development.
Okay. So no mention of Gates. But because
we know Gates is part of them and
they work together, let's just throw their names
in there together. Right? Because why not? Because
if I come out and say, well, Gates
isn't part of that, oh, you just wanna
hide the gate whatever the whatever the defenders
will say to push aside the fact that,
well, it's not accurate though, is it? And
I have no doubt that Gates is probably
involved in some way. But the point is
that this is not based on his research.
It's based on the floated idea that he
knows his rabid followers will defend because if
you say otherwise, you're fighting for Bill Gates.
But this is not new information. We've all
talked about this. Not this exact post, but
the reality of the mRNA direction for all
these shots, bird flu included, which we already
talked about.
Okay. So when he highlights that one clip
and says that they Bill Gates and Tedros
are working have announced this, well, it's really
just the WHO has announced the direction. That's
not the same as saying that they've stood
up together and called on the military to
arrest you if you say no, which is
the point of this title or this whole
push.
Then it says, a prominent Bill Gates funded
doctor. Now my point is, you go through
here and you tell me anywhere else,
literally anywhere else, where it gives you any
information about what they're actually saying they're doing
together. From here, it just goes on in
all sorts of partisan claims and different connections.
None of it has to do with the
actual title claim.
The point and it will get to the
fake tweet they put in the title as
well, which is, you know, like, quoting things
that they say they never said. And they
go, oh, it's just for illustrative purposes. That's
a lie, guys. You're pretending it's a tweet
that Bill Gates put out there. He did
not put that out there. Vaccine refusenics will
feel the full weight of the law with
a little syringe after it.
That's not real.
And if you push, you'll probably, oh, I
was just trying to make a point. No.
You're lying. It's a it's a flat out
lie that people are buying.
A prominent Bill Gates funded doctor has called
for the police forces and the military to
be deployed as part of an effort. That's
that's
maniac hotez.
And quite frankly, he didn't even say exactly
the way he just he's listing it off
the way he wrote it in his article.
You can listen to him in the video,
he he simply says what he's already said,
that people should be forced because it's the
right thing to do. We already know this.
That's not new. Hotez does not represent the
WHO or Bill Gates despite connections that you
can find between every one of these people.
Then it says according to Hotez, which is
the person they were mentioning, a close associate
of Bill Gates and Tedros, oh, therefore, they're
the same. That's easy. Good journalism.
They are now pushing to get NATO on
board to militarize the next mRNA vaccine rollout.
Now all of what they're pushing is based
on flimsy, subjective,
hypothetical
conversations
based on Hotez suggesting what they wanna do.
Does that mean
that that won't come to pass? No.
And it doesn't even matter if it ultimately
does. The point is what he's doing here
is simply laying out what he projects as
the future
or speak what he knows will get clicks
and views and shares.
It's dangerous bad journalism.
And, yeah, he has a right to do
it. And I have a right to call
it out.
Now here's the video itself.
Now I'm gonna I'm gonna breeze through this
very quickly. Okay, sister joined. I want you
to see how ridiculous this is.
Bill Gases joined forces with the World Health
Organization
That happened a long time ago. In calling
for vaccine refuses to be rounded up by
the military and forced jabbed with mRNA during
the next pandemic. Nope.
Mm-mm.
Not true. Gay Sandhu
have ordered governments to lay the groundwork to
He's just listing off the article, guys. It's
not true. Penalize the military because they claim
that vaccine skepticism
is morally reprehensible
and vaccine Okay. So the my point is
the same. These are not these are based
on the subjective hypothetical assumptions based on what
Hotez says. There's no tweet that says that.
So if you go through this Refusal is
in doctor Ted There's no source material. It's
him reading off his article. Trust of the
globe, United States, be deployed. And then he
gets to Hotez. Right? So, oh, weird. We
must have missed the part where the WHO
and Bill Gates have called for the military
because it didn't happen, though. It's part of
an effort to deal with what the I
have to give you a very long I
don't know the answer to your question answer,
because it is very complicated duration
is understand how to do this. And I've
said the same with I met with, doctor
Tedros,
last month in in Geneva, WHO. The street
looks like it's struggling, by the way. Let
me know if you guys are cutting out
or you can still hear it. The director
general to say, I don't know that the
World Health Organization
can solve this on our own. We need
the other United Nations agencies. Yeah. This is
not new, by the way. Peter Hotez has
expressed his maniacal opinions many times, and we've
covered it. Derek Brose, I I have to
link what was it, Derek?
I thought Derek yeah. I'm pretty sure Derek
got some questions from him as well. The
point is this is not new information. So
Peter hotez saying that he thinks we should
push people to do it is not new.
Through whatever channel is not new. None of
this amounts to Bill Gates and the WHO
partnering and then publicly declaring that you'll be
arrested with the military if you don't take
it. So So if you go through this,
you'll see Peter Hotez, and that's the only
video. 1,000,000,000 of dollars in funding
to produce experimental vaccines
as well as aligning Yeah. All the stuff
we already know. Yeah. They work on vaccines.
Yeah. So you build on things around it
that you can prove, and that makes it
seem as if somehow these are legitimate claims,
but the core claim is not true. Should
be charged with a hate crime. Yes. Now
we're And because of his fame, he's also
a frequent target for Action mechanisms for sign
Threats. Began over Hotez sharing and promoting a
VICE article.
So it from here,
I mean, I could keep going. It goes
into other subjective points about what Peter Hotez
said and their other opinions.
No. Peter, if you claim what RFK Jr
is saying is misinformation,
I'm off Okay. So Peter lies, and he's
challenging. So what does it have to do
with the original claim? You're just drifting away
from that. You were a 100,000 Things took
a quick turn once Twitter CEO Elon Musk
jumped into the exchange,
saying Hotez is afraid to face a public
topic.
And yet Hotez,
who wants to use the military to round
up and force jab vaccine Hey. Right back
around to the false claim, they filling the
gaps with things that oh, here's his real
tweet. Here's Peter Hotez pushing vaccines.
Okay. I'd love to see any source material
on that claim. I'd love to see it.
Anybody Users still eradicate the freedom to dissent
once and for all.
Today's sponsor is pills for Oh, I forgot
to tell you. There's at least 3 ads
and sponsors jammed in there. Buy buy these
pills, by the way, while we're pushing you
fake information. I wonder if there's anything to
do with it. Dotcom. You can order medicines
that big pharma don't want you to have.
Oh, of course. They're the secret insider big
pharma medicines. Right? Such as Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine. You
know, Ivermectin that you can literally buy pretty
much anywhere today. Right? And
He turned from people medicine. Oh, still on
the advertisement, by the way.
Might sound like an impossible task until you
understand that the Biden regime has been laying
the groundwork to make this a reality. Oh,
I forgot to tell you. Very partisan. Yeah.
Surprise, surprise. See, for the past 12 Hutchison,
these prison like compounds located in Country. Yep.
And so Now he's got an interview talking
about something else around his opinions that these
are, like look. The idea of FEMA camps
or any number of things, that's not new.
Pointing out that the government is doing these
things in preparation for arresting Americans
is not evidence that the WHO and Bill
Gates you get it, hopefully,
because it doesn't really matter if you believe
that he's like, even if you think that
him faking this information or lying about it
will help other people reach some level of
truth,
that's the qanon logic, guys. They're manipulating
you. And I know most of you already
know this, but I think it's really important.
If I just reach one person out there
who is leaning
spreading this stuff, you're hurting the truth. You're
hurting people's awareness of the reality that the
what the these the sliver of reality that
exists within this fake information.
It's
broad, but
specifically, she worked on Ford operation bases, Bob.
And by the way, I'm not familiar with
who this is, and in no way am
I talking neg negatively about this person. Yeah.
I mean, if, like, if people out there
who have contagious information, I'm not gonna begrudge
somebody from going on anybody out there that
will listen to them. Right? But my point
is, if you listen to it all, it
it's not about the main claim.
It contracts second.
And the second And the renegotiation refuses.
We know they're not being built for the
tens of millions of illegal immigrants who've marched
across Now we're on under the caravan. We
somehow have worked that into the argument
about oh, there's his name, by the way.
Oh, look. Another another ad. Right? You get
the point, guys.
It frustrates me. And look. Despite the obvious
and provable reality that that's not something you're
gonna find, it, you will still get attacked
for it.
Because that's that's team sport politics, that's partisanship.
And here's just somebody's this is just a
point to make on top of it. Look,
what's funny about this is the the obvious
the obvious ridiculousness
of the fact checking industry in the corporate
media, that it was just ridiculous, like, Snopes
being kind of a cornerstone of that, which
was y'all laugh at how dumb and and
obviously manipulative they are, it doesn't mean that
checking facts on your own is somehow wrong.
It's this weird
overreaction, like, we get, like, people stop washing
their hands after COVID 19 because that was
always a good thing, and it's still very
smart for you to do.
The point here is that this person goes,
look and this is and this is Crock,
I believe, by the way, from Twitter. He
says, breaking Bill Gates, WHO, calls for military
to round up and blah blah blah. And
responds by saying, there is no verified information
supporting a claim of any of that. At
Bill Gates, they're doing it because it's not
true. It's not happening. Now, publicly,
the point is somebody goes fact checkers with
a clown.
Okay. Well, this isn't Snopes, bud. This is
just a this is actually through Twitter. So
you're from the partisan side you're leaning from,
this is their that's that's supposed to be
their good one. Right? The bottom line is,
it's not real. And so to just dismiss
anybody trying to say that that you there's
this weird part where suddenly you pointing out
that it's false makes you a fact checker,
and somehow you're, like, the absolutely guy. It's,
like, well, doesn't it matter that things are
false? Like, it's just kinda crazy how this
reaction and this is all the 2 party
manipulation, guys. It all comes back to the
same partisan manipulation, just different parts of it.
And this was the point I wanted to
show as well. This person highlights saying this
has already happened in New Zealand. Well, technically
it's not true. But I do appreciate this
was pointed out, and I had already seen
this, in fact. And it simply says, why
would you think the WHO isn't considering it?
You see my point?
I'm not saying that they're not considering it.
I'm saying Kim stating that they've stand stood
up and publicly announced a partnership and that
they're calling on the military to do that
is obviously false. Not that they're not considering
it. He he didn't say they're considering doing
this. He said it's already done, it's happened,
they're publicly announcing it.
To respond like that shows you that you
don't care that he's being dishonest. I find
that odd.
But my point is, this is something we
should talk about. And I said, that's a
proposed plan yet to be implemented in New
Zealand. And it'll be I'll be the first
to tell you that, as usual, this is
a real possibility,
yet not real. But what he's pushing, as
usual, are high symbolic lies based on possibilities.
Playing
to fears.
The tweet image is not genuine.
Oh, I thought there was, well, any case,
there was the tweet image which was right
here.
Which I think is important to see.
I think I already showed you. Vaccine refusenix
will feel the full weight of the law.
That's just straight up lying guys. That's lying.
Now this
is important though. Now again, this is new.
This is a proposal.
Oh, that's right. Shoot. Hold on. Let me
just go back to one real quick. New
Zealand, this is the July 2024, and it's
a framework for action. Right? Meaning that this
is proposed. It has not happened yet. And
I think it
was shoot. I just lost it.
Hold on.
Then we'll get to the point where it
lists off the possibility. Now this is real,
and we've already talked about this many, many
times. We talked about this during COVID 19.
We talked about how this happened during COVID
19 in many locations,
where essentially there were people that were held
down and forced injected under the the guys
that this was in their best interest.
Come on.
Shouldn't have removed it. Oh, here. Remember here?
Here we go. Perfect. So under special powers.
It says special powers, and this is for
New Zealand and is proposed. Special powers are
authorized by the Ministry of Health or by
an epidemic notice,
a or apply apply when an emergency
has been declared, and this is the same
game that's played everywhere.
And it says the main part right here
and it really just says, you know, the
same kind of thing. And even there's stuff
like this in Florida and plenty of Republican
places too, where it opens the idea that
if they should need to, they can isolate
or quarantine you without your knowledge, rather with
your your consent, really. And this one is
the main part where it says, they state
that a member of the police may do
anything reasonably necessary, in parenthesis literally says including
the use of force, to help a medical
officer of health or any person authorized by
the medical officer of health in the exercise
or performance of powers or functions. Now, that
doesn't necessarily say injections,
but let's not but very clearly that obviously
could apply.
And again, that's not new. You'll find these
kind of statements in all over US legislation
in very, very clear ways.
Doesn't matter that it's a violation of your
constitutional rights, but the point nonetheless is this
is not the WHO
and Bill Gates announcing a national
progra you know, we're gonna tell the military
to arrest
you. I hope that's clear. Because, guys, this
is on overdrive right now. It's everywhere.
Now 1 2 things we're gonna talk about
really quickly about Twitter in this conversation, then
we're gonna talk about Trump, then we're gonna
talk about the 2 party illusion conversation back
to the same point we started with here,
then we're gonna get into Venezuela and Iran.
Now despite CJ Hopkins in a very ridiculous
flip fashion calling me a white supremacist or
what whatever he called me because I
clearly highlighted that the Israeli government has an
overwhelming influence on our government. Somehow that makes
me a white supremacist because he's blinded himself
to the reality that Israel,
the only government apparently, can't do that because
if you say that about them, you're racist.
Anybody else? Of course. Why wouldn't we call
it out? But if you say, Israel's you're
racist.
It was a really ridiculous and embarrassing exchange.
I don't know why. I I I liked
his work during COVID 19 and I I
we went back and forth on it. And
it was embarrassing. I felt bad for him
even though he's been kind of lashing out
at people all over the place around these
topics. My point in saying all of that
is it doesn't matter that I think he's
embarrassing himself around the Israel conversation or calling
people things that are personal, that have nothing
to do with my actual opinion. I'm not
a white supremacist. I'm not attacking anybody. I'm
literally standing alongside Jews and Muslims and everybody
fighting against anybody doing what Israel is doing.
But my point in that is that what
he's gonna call out here is still important.
You don't have to agree with someone to
point out that what's happening to them is
unjust.
He says, I'm being prosecuted for tweeting.
Twitter is censoring his content. Surprise, surprise. Guess
what? It's content around COVID 19. Amazon banned
his book. Now Google is erasing my book
covers. Perhaps he's getting paranoid, but he's being
is it's funny how that works. Right? Now
now now you're you're a conspiracy theorist, but
it's kinda the same thing he's saying with
people talking about Israel.
He says, but I'm beginning to suspect the
powers that be don't like me.
It's the usual way this goes that, you
know, if as long as he sees it,
he can call it conspiracy theory. But if
you do it, he's decided that's off limits,
then you're crazy. All the people that a
lot of too many of them do it.
But my point in highlighting
this is that he's openly calling out Twitter
for censoring him, as well as everybody else.
I just want us to remember that this
is not something that's gone away. It's more
behind the scenes,
but it's still very much happening.
Now this is something that Elon just tweeted
again, by the way, on the 1st August.
And I just talked weirdly enough, this got
buried by
the beginning of,
the Trump assassination attempt. Because the day I
was do or the that's just the show
that as we started, I it happened literally
seconds app I really the show started seconds
after it had happened.
We were literally just starting the opening graphic
and it was somebody on the tweet comments
were like, Trump just got shot. And so
we jumped on and talked about it early.
That's why I changed the title even to
Trump shot in the beginning and then we
went on. The point is, Elon supporters blatantly
ignored Twitter's partnership with GARM,
Global Alliance For Responsible Media, which by the
way is undeniable, guys. Here is Twitter safety
saying it. We're excited to announce that Twitter
has reinstated the relationship with
Garm.
And the reason that's so ridiculous
is because Elon's acting like that's something they're
calling out. Ben Shapiro sits down in front
of congress and just can't stop talking
I agree by the way, Garmin's a problem.
But then Elon points it out and says,
yeah. A problem. Literally, while they had just
restarted their partnership with Garm. Doesn't that strike
you as a little bit manipulative?
Flat out dishonest? It should.
And here we go again. House Judiciary GOP
saying, break in. Jim Jordan seeks demo demo,
documents for over 40 companies involved with GARM
and their collusion to censor people. They and
they're making it all about conservatives.
Ask yourself why not a one of these
large conservative accounts are pointing out that Elon
Musk and Twitter are partnered with them. By
the way, Garm is the World Economic Forum's
flagship product, they say.
Doesn't that seem strange?
I still don't believe this has gotten 0
and I there's few people in the independent
media that's gotten coverage about this. I don't
know why. Maybe it's because it's the middle
of my long shows, and these get so
suppressed everywhere else that nobody sees it. I
don't know. It seems to happen often enough
where we are light years ahead of a
story and it gets breaking news coverage weeks
later after we break it down.
But Twitter, I wrote underneath his tweet, is
literally partnered with GARM. How ridiculous this all
is.
And weird how little engagement it gets. Right?
And then some but other people pointing it
out. Elon is such a fraud, showing you
a tweet.
It's very odd, isn't it?
Make sure you don't miss this, guys. It's
a very underreported story. And it's very obvious
that he's trying to pretend the other by
the way, for the podcast, what he tweeted
there was just popcorn after that GOP tweet.
Acting like he's watching this take place while
he's partnered with Garm or previously
acting like we should fight against Garm while
Twitter is literally partnered with it. It. At
the time, the ones that chose to acknowledge
it were like, he doesn't know. Yackerino did
it without him knowing. Well, it's been a
long enough time where you know he knows
about it and he has yet to say
a word about it.
That's very alarming.
And not new or unexpected if you've been
watching.
But Ward pointed out to Elon x is
part of Garmin. Like, come on. He knows
that. It's tweeted by Twitter.
But here's Ohio made saying, keep your enemies
close.
You know, right out of qanon nonsense.
Right? How'd that work in Trump's administration? Right?
You gotta have insiders to fight from the
inside and then they all were bad guys,
apparently.
Almost like anybody with a brain was calling
out before the qanon narrative was laid over
the top of it. All of the ones
that turned out to be the Eve of
Barr and Ray and oh my god. The
well, the point is and Ray was appointed,
but the even his administration was
the swamp.
To to quote Jimmy's joke that he drained
the swamp and he found his cabin at
the bottom. It's all starting over again.
In in a technocratic version with Elon and
Thiel and v JD Vance. I mean, guys,
this is the same dang game.
Keep your enemies close? Oh, okay. So it's
okay to partner with the very thing that
you're saying is ruining social media because enemy
is closed or whatever?
Yeah. That really makes sense, doesn't it? A
company or a person? You know, it's just
amazing the willful ignorance of people. And may
he may be joking, by the way. I
don't wanna call it. Him maybe he's make
saying that because that is dumb and I
would laugh if I thought he was joking.
But sadly, I know that people actually think
that.
Now on the other side of this, the
other amazing thing that I still get hasn't
got any coverage. I even tagged censored man
in this who was the one that was
really ringing the bell. I don't nobody's talked
about this. I don't understand how that's possible.
I we just talked about this.
Twitter is still using Authentix,
the Israeli intelligence company
to verify users on Twitter.
And let's see if that form comes up
again. I literally just went over this. Yep.
There it is.
It says right there, I consent to x
and Authentix
using images of my ID and my selfie,
including
extracted
biometric data.
Do you want Israel's intelligence taking your biometric
data? For god only knows what they're use
well, I don't think we even understand what
this stuff will mean in 20, 30 years.
What about for Palestinians who wanna use Twitter?
Or, I mean, you you have to realize
how crazy that is. And the point is
the main point, he stood up and said,
I will we we went with Stripe because
we heard we realized it was a prob.
Okay. Then you didn't though. Either you didn't
because the the fact that this is still
there is a legal thing.
They're still using it. So he he either
lied about it or he was lied to.
But somebody recently told me that apparently Stripe
was only for the US people.
Which is just as crazy. So there's placating
the US people and they're still using autentics
everywhere else? Let's work with the genocide government.
Well, that's not new. Elon's been partnered with
them for a while. The bottom line is
that should blow your mind.
He he lies about it and says we're
stopping it, but it's still there. And it
it's a very clear violation of your rights,
of your privacy with a government that's literally
committing genocide. Does that concern anybody?
And over here, lying about Garm. Yeah. Bad
guy Garm while you partner with them. It
takes a very special will for ignorance to
not to
in to not acknowledge
how obvious this is and how you're being
played.
And now this was,
this person, I just said, oh, yeah. That
was it right there. He says Stripe verification
was only in the US for users and
I just said, well, I'm in the US
and it says authentics. Right? I just think
it's important to see that.
Now, this is our show we did about
this. What this actually before it really kinda
caught the attention. I recommend Censored Man's breakdown
on it because he did way past what
I did in the show. But this was
from the 2023, December 22nd, Israeli unit, 8200
type company runs Twitter verification. Whitney was breaking
it down as well.
I'll include this. This was the Bill Gates
information. Now, so thinking about biometric data, right?
Here's just one small example of where this
is really going. And this is in real
time. The where it's gonna be in a
decade from now. I really I I think
it's gonna be terrifying for people to realize
what this stuff really amount to.
Biometricupdate.com
on yesterday, goo
entitled Google Settles Over Kids Biometric Data Collection
in Schools.
Google and the parents
of the Illinois girl who sued the tech
giant in state court in 2020,
alleging Google violated 2 sections of their Biometric
Information Privacy Act, which they did, have agreed
to settle,
in which the case is in its entirety
has been sent back to the US Circuit
Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit.
And usually when it settles, that means you
don't really get more information. You know, that
that this is why we have such a
broken system here. Because if you're rich, you
don't really ever get held accountable. And the
and it says the settlement comes on the
heels of Illinois residents having started receiving payments
last year as part of a $65,800,000
class action settlement with Google.
See? One after another. They just pay it
off and keep going and nobody cares for
nearly identical
violations.
Does that sound like a company that's gonna
learn its lesson? No. It realizes, look, as
long as we have $85,000,000
on the side, we can just keep paying
people off. Just like wall,
Wells Fargo
or any number of entities that just go,
yeah. It was longer. It's as Kate Caitlin
Johnstone puts it, it becomes a part of
doing business.
You're making $10,000,000,000
that year, you put aside a 1,000,000,000. When
you go, good.
The largest one Trump praised himself for was
a $1,000,000,000 fine for Wells Fargo. They made
10 times that that year.
So they profited for the crime.
And then we act like we hold them
accountable.
Same thing is happening here.
So they settle, but guess what? They're still
taking your child's data. They're still using that
data for god knows what dark things they're
doing back there. And this is just one
aspect, what do you think Twitter's doing? Where
do you think the information is going? The
machine learning and the algorithmic, they're they're using
this to to develop what they're trying to
develop. And of course, what we think is
AI and whatever else, but I I have
a sense that it's way further than that.
This should worry people.
Now here, just on a quick side note
that I've just this just freaked me out.
Orwell Shell this shared this with me.
It it's something
especially eerie.
As I said, yuck.
Literally the stuff of my nightmares, and with
a slight change in background music, think about
this when you listen to it, with just
a slight change of background. You can you
can almost argue the music itself is fitting,
but just a slight change of background music,
this could literally be an episode of Black
Mirror. Right? Which puts, like, some dark eerie
background music and this would be just what
you're seeing in those shows. And I and
I said, don't pay it, like, kind of
like don't mind the man behind the curtain.
Don't pay any mind to the government behind
the algorithm scooping up all your real time
data, influencing your decisions and gaining access to
your devices.
Watch this. It says, introducing
friend.
That's actually what it's called, lowercase friend because
they love their lowercase starting words, don't they?
Gosh, I'm out of breath.
We made it.
I don't know how to woo very good.
That's fair.
Oh, sorry. I was muted. So for those
in the podcast,
the girl a woman that's climbed a mountain
and has a little AI device on her
on her necklace, and and it it interacts
with her. Where it buzzes and she looks
and it's talking to her. Oh, it's a
nice view or whatever. Which means it can
see what you're looking at. It can hear
what you're doing. That's what it is. It's
a constant 247 surveillance device, but only for
your friend to engage with you. How often
does that work out in the and look
look home throughout the past all the time
they said, no. We won't violate your privacy
until we sell it to somebody or justify
it for any number of reasons or blah,
never cared in the first place.
This is terrifying. Just this just the idea
of this being normalized. And let's be clear,
a woman like this that's gonna hike a
mountain is not gonna be someone using these
things. That's my opinion. Those people are the
the the market for this are the people
that never leave their homes. That's what I
would argue. But to they go for the
podcast, it's gonna go on where you're gonna
hear the buzz and it pops up as
a text message, and that's them engaging with
their friend.
Alright.
That's fair.
Alright. Let's go.
Let me show you how to game, bro.
Okay? Oh, come on. Come on. Oh, let's
go. Are you serious?
Come on, man.
I hate this game.
Take notes, baby. Oh, man. You guys suck.
Bro, you look like the back of the
On this one, the guy's playing video games,
and it texted while he's playing, you're getting
thrashed. It's embarrassing.
Oh, thanks, buddy.
Obviously, that's meant to be like a playful
buddy friend thing, but it's just super weird,
man. Again, imagine this with, like, an eerie
background music. This is Black Mirror.
Let's go.
Dude, what? How did you do that?
Do it? You know, like, the hip it's
drag all hip and young. I know the
effects are
crazy. It's dank. I could eat one of
these every day.
How weird.
Sorry. I got you messy. Oh, sorry. I
dropped everything on you. God, that's so gross
to me. So she drops what it looks
like to on her
on her,
little whatever it is. A little ai thing
on her necklace.
And she goes, oh, sorry. I got you
messy. And the thing says, yum. It's like,
fuck. Yeah. So I don't know why it
just creeps me out. It's so gross and
fake. And it's like, what? Who does that?
Like, it's just such a this is somebody
who, like I mean, I don't know. I
don't wanna go too hard. I mean, I'm
sure there are people that probably need a
friend, but the point is that it's such
a weird
kind of fake
engage that's like they my point is this
is trying to get you to engage with
less human pea less engagement with people.
And if you think for one second this
isn't gonna mine all of your dad and
listen to what you're saying, you know, for
national security,
You're lying to yourself.
It's really nice up here. How'd you find
this place?
I don't know.
I just
kinda like to come off here to be
by myself.
I've never called anybody else.
I mean, besides her.
Oh, besides her.
It's
Like that movie as Orwell's pointing out. I
think it's it's her. Right? The one with,
I forgot his name now. But, yeah, it's
it's exactly what this is. Right? You know,
people will
develop relationships with this. I mean, it's it's
not that's not normal, guys. It's not healthy.
She goes everywhere with you. Right?
Guess I must be doing something right then.
I guess so.
We'll see.
Yeah. Apparently, it never shuts off ever. That's
the whole
point. Because how else would it be able
to engage with you all the time?
I mean, here's the point to think about.
Just like the cell phone
literally became your 247 spy device that they
like, when they sat back decades ago and
envisioned, like, you know, how do we get
these things in all of their homes?
The magic plan was, you know what? Let's
make them do it. Let's find a way
to get them to embrace having a device
on them all the time. Well, what do
you know? I mean, there's plenty of ways
it's being used to fight back as well.
I would argue, at least, I I hope.
You know? But the point is,
this is the same idea. This will just
be normalized and it becomes the same it's
just it's a step in the same direction.
Now it's an always on, same like, where
not here's the point, this becomes something that
you acknowledge is always on. It's and this
is going way beyond, like, this will be
engaged with your biometrics.
That's the whole point.
Very, very uncomfortable. This makes me very uncomfortable.
Now this person says, as adding to this
rightly, I feel similarly about the prayer app
called Hallow, I think, that was founded by
Peter Thiel. Of all people. Peter Thiel, of
course. Because that makes sense. And is being
promoted by so many influencers. I've seen it
too. I think Bran talks about it. It's
weird. Why would you share your prayers with
the deep state? Now you don't maybe you
don't think that's what it is, but ask
yourself, maybe there's something out there. You're literally
putting your prayers out there on some digital
content. Why?
You it it almost seems blasphemous to me.
The idea that you're this is something very,
very special and and revered between you and
whatever you're believe you're speaking to, depending on
what religion or where you're from. The point
is that to do this, to circumvent that
and put it on Theo's device,
like that's supposed to be some fast track.
Like, that's gross. That is about the circumvention
like like Courtney and I talked about. Creating
the dynamic where no. The digital aspect is
the is the deity, or who's the trap
behind it, or you are yourself. It's a
problem.
It says you're just asking to be manipulated
and be abused. Historically, how do we not
see that? Every single one of these things
turns out to be exactly what they promised
it wasn't.
Now
we're gonna come back to this when we
get into the Lebanon part. But Suppressed News
is discussing Israel using WhatsApp,
as they've already been shown to do before,
in regard to locating the the leader of
Hamas to kill him. You know, the leader
of Hamas they were also funding for this
entire time, which nobody wants to talk about,
weirdly enough.
The point there is to recognize that your
device,
whether it's Whatsapp or Twitter or whatever else,
could be used in the same way. Or
not only that, is tracking you, is monitoring
your information, and we all generally kinda know
that in some way. Just act like it's
kind of a me you know, that's just
the way it is today. But just realize
that just because this happens with somebody who
you you know, and and on top of
that realize this was a completely illegal whether
he's the biggest terrorist alive or not, everything
about this was illegal. Violating airspace. I mean,
every butch way.
But they also lie about all of these
people. The bottom line though is they realize
as as he writes, Israel allegedly used advanced
spyware to target Hamas' leader
by sending a WhatsApp message that localizes his
exact position. The spyware, similar to the NSO
Group's Pegasus,
enabled Israeli intelligence to access his phone's data
and pinpoint his location leading to the assassination.
The incident demonstrates the significant role of digital
surveillance in modern
intelligence operations and raises concerns about privacy and
the misuse of such tools, obviously.
We're well past that, guys. This could be
done to any one of you right now.
Just think about that. And think about where
we're going and the direction this is taking
us and whether you truly understand what that
biometric data and whatever else is being taken
from you right now, mostly without your knowledge
is actually gonna be used for. Now we're
gonna come back to this in regard to
this entire conversation. But before we do that,
let's briefly talk about Trump
and this will bring us into the conversation
of the kind of
problem that I see arising around largely the
right right now from the not them, but
the 2 party illusion manipulating them and the
larger conversation of the 2 party illusion. But
I just wanted to highlight this again because
I really am just kind of it's almost
just fascinating. The weird way and this is
also about this point, but again, it's not
unique to one side. It's the entire paradigm.
The weird way in which people will just
ignore
the most blatant
things because it's uncomfortable to their agenda.
Which is pretty obviously the antithesis of truth.
But,
Jason Bassler posted this. What do you think?
Does ear cartilage heal in under 2 weeks?
Well, based on literally everything you could find,
the answer is no. Why hasn't Trump's team
released any medical info about the incident and
why did this doctor say it was a
2 centimeter wound? Which he did. That's true.
Ronnie Jackson. I I went over all this
in the previous show, you can watch it
right there. I'll briefly show this again.
Well, it's interesting to me. First of all,
let's for not forget that he went to
the hospital. And if now and this is
according to corporate media speaking with them, people
that have refused to answer, that they're not
allowed. The doctors, anybody at the hospital, they've
been they've been told they're not allowed to
say anything about anything that happened there. What
they saw, what they did to Trump, none
of them. Doesn't that seem strange?
And then Ronnie Jackson's the only one that's
commented and is the only one that's been
allowed to work with him outside of that.
They they the records aren't allowed to be
released. I mean, it's a very strange dynamic.
My point about who knows? Maybe I'm sure
there could be something that would explain that.
Privacy, whatever.
But the point overall
is the idea of the actual
Ronny Jackson discussion.
Now, if you remember
I don't think I have it to come
up right now.
It's right here. I'm sure I can find
it. I didn't plan on bringing it up.
It's not necessary. But the point is, that
in this discussion,
Ronny Jackson was quoted by Associated Press.
Says that Trump had a 2 centimeter wound.
2 centimeter. Now, many people responding were like,
yeah. That's right. It was tiny. I'm not
even really thinking about it because that sounds
small. Recognize how big that is.
K? There's a dime right there. 2 centimeters
is the number 2 right there.
It's bigger than a dime. K? That's almost
a dime almost 2 dimes. It's I think
it's like point 7 of an inch.
That's that's for an ear for any rut.
That's a big gap.
That's a hole. That's not possibly something that
can heal in 12 days. Because 12 days
later is when he took off the bandage
and got the first shot. 1st photograph.
Let's do this and see if it pops
up.
Nope.
Nah. It's in there somewhere,
but I wanna try to find it.
But the point is that he's the one
that spoke publicly spoke out. And I've been
Again, it's Let's do this actually. It's probably
the easiest.
I hate when I do that because then
I feel like I have to find out
that somebody's gonna tell themselves I'm lying about
it.
How the how there it is.
So this is the this entire article was
about the shoot Donald Trump and his ear
and the whole conversation.
And it says I'm trying to see it
on the small screen. That's why it wouldn't
have shown that on there.
Alright. Now I'm gonna have to find it.
Hold on.
Let's see.
Yeah. I'm gonna get into that. There's an
interesting conversation about whether there's an I have
another local plot,
article saying that there were multiple things that
shot that flew off and hit him or
hit the local police around him. So there's
more thing. But, again, so many of these
things have maybe I'm just gonna leave it.
I don't wanna take all this time to
find it.
Oh, well. We'll leave it there. But just
check it out for yourself. The point here
is that in this article,
Ronnie Jackson's quoted as saying a 2 centimeter
gap in his ear.
It has to drive it drives me crazy.
I just wanna find it real quick, but
I don't wanna take the time. But the
point being that this is no way that
could heal in 12 days. Right? Now here
is the
shot from the Bitcoin conference,
which just I was just guys, I it's
there's literally nothing.
There's not a scar. There's not a gap.
There's and whether and the first people wanna
say, it's because the stitches, but his son
publicly said there were no stitches. Or it's
a Band Aid. No. There's no Band Aid
on. Well, you know, either or makeup or
whatever. It's just there's no way, unless Ronnie
Jackson is lying, which that's certainly possible, that
that would be the case.
Now here somebody highlights this underneath this conversation.
Here, let me do this.
Let me start playing this real quick.
Because see People are asking about the chat
and it's it's just frustrates me that I
have to reprove these things in the show.
And I just I know it's not you
guys asking. But this is how it works
in the way that people will dismiss anything
because they just don't want to do the
research and or look at the links you
provide. Let me play this real quick and
I'll find that article.
This is from the,
the show where we discussed the bird flu.
Yeah. Like somebody's pointing out, like, plastic surgery.
Yeah. I mean, that this there these are
certain it certainly could be,
but plastic surgery requires some level of of,
you know, invade you're you're cutting and and,
you know, he has to heal. Is the
point. 12 days, I don't believe it.
But more than that,
is the idea that you have a 2
centimeter hole and the timing and the angle,
or the angle itself and how that was
even the shot that I thought whether it
was possible. I don't believe it.
But, yeah, let me play the beginning of
this.
Let's keep let's look at this for a
second. Right? So here is what Jason Basler
put out on 27th.
He says, just look at the size of
that hole in his ear. Oh, wait. This
is from The Independent.
And it says, without an ear bandage. I
mean, and look at
and this is also from a weird angle,
not that close, but it's agree.
So this is,
the 27th.
Okay? So we're talking,
what, 14 days?
You know there would be a scar?
Or rather, excuse me, a a a scab
or something? Oh, look. Again, the point that
I should've said a second ago when I'm
giving you the
barely nicked his ear.
But the whole argument we keep getting, and
I'm gonna read to you from the Associated
Press where his own doctor says a 2
centimeter hole in his ear, which clearly isn't
the case, and I'm gonna get to the
closer pictures in a second.
How does that line up? And all of
the audience was the one talking about, well,
first it was, well, that's the right amount
of blood. And I said, no, I argue
ears of bleep.
Alright. There it is.
So just so it's clear,
this is Associated Press, and this is a
public statement made by Ronnie Jackson. So this
is not a secret thing. My point is
that I felt like obligated to show it
again because I'm already seeing people, like, you
know, question it. But see, it says, the
first medical account of Trump's condition didn't come
until a full week after the shooting. When
Jackson, Ronny Jackson, released his letter so this
is public, guys. Last Saturday evening, in it,
he said the bullet was struck. Trump had,
quote, produced a 2 centimeter wide wound.
There you go.
Undeniable. Now, of course, he could be lying
about that. But he says that extended down
the cartilage surface of the ear. That's important
because all these what I'm gonna show you
next, in fact, it shows you that this
it over whether it's a nick or the
cartilage or what part it is, there's all
different varying times people argue it takes to
heal. This is the worst case scenario in
the timing we're talking about. And a 2
centimeter hole
is big.
It's bigger than that dime.
Think about that. Okay? That's crazy.
I just don't know how that's not a
crazy obvious point to make right now. And
people are just trying to put this to
bed still, it seems,
which is very suspicious.
Now, how you think a 2 centimeter hole,
which, by the way, it's a dime. Think
about a big dent is on your ear,
guys.
It's more. It's it's point 7 of a
of an inch. So it's it's more than
a dime and a half.
So this was posted. Zady says this, I
watched both of you guys. Oh, that was
this get to the point.
This person says,
something about what Jimmy was talking about and
he goes, you know, I have considered the
basically, we were Jimmy and I at the
end of our interview, which we just put
out. I'll I'll mention it later in the
show. We talk about this. We get into
this conversation. I think it's right there. No.
It's coming up.
But we get into this and we talk
about at the end of the our interview.
And the point is about whether we I
I think that, you know, there's still valid
questions to be had. Right? And so this
person saying that, like, did I have considered
this? And here is
one picture of Trump as of a recent
picture.
Here is a picture he put out of
him saying I nicked my upper ear cartilage
over 1 month ago with electric clippers while
trimming my hair.
Look at that.
Now, of course, it's his it's his opinion,
or it's his him stating that. Question everything.
But, guys, look it up. Look it up
how long it takes for these things. And
that is a nick.
I that's think think about a bullet or
a 2 centimeter hole. I just don't know
how this isn't the most obvious lie ever.
There's I mean, you know, again, to be
very clear, it all could be summed up
by Ronnie Jackson wanting Trump to look like
a badass. Right?
Oh my god. Shot. He's a gangster. Maybe
that's all it was. But that doesn't then
explain the angles and the lies and everything
else around it. I just think this is
one part of a massive manipulation.
And everything from there and that's not to
say that I think fake or anything else.
Honestly, I think it's more confusing now than
it was to start.
Everything that comes out, as I'll show you
in a second, that's new seems to contradict
what was had before. And it just undermines
the entire premise. Oh, no. Now this is
the story.
Now apparently it was 10 shots,
which it will get to in a second.
And may and that is now
arguably being done because it it makes it
sound like he well, I'll get to it
in a second.
Well, here this person says, yeah, stitched wound
can heal that fast. And the same thing.
Well, he didn't get stitches.
So what it shows you is even people
that are fighting for this to, like, defend
Trump
are also aware that there's something wrong. Because
they're having to say the lie to make
it make sense. Oh, it's a stitches. No.
He didn't get stitches based on his son.
So that means she also is kinda going,
well, yeah. This that would be weird if
it wasn't for the stitches, but there are
none. So they don't wanna admit to themselves
that there's also something wrong here.
Now here's a local report, and this is
one I hadn't seen. This is from 13th.
Here's what this says. This is,
well, his his account was bread and I
forgot we changed it to now, but he
shared this with me. And it says let's
get rid of this. Damn it. What is
that? Getting rid of this stupid thing that
in the way, whatever. It says,
updates on that day being updated. It says
11 investigates, this local news 11 from the
area, has learned that 4 Pittsburgh police officers
assigned to the former president's motorcade suffered minor
injuries.
The 4 motorcade officers are part of Donald
Trump's escort from the rally in Butler.
Sources tell chief investigator Rick Earl that officers
were just a few feet away when Trump
was shots rang out from Trump. The 4
officers
suffered minor injuries from flying debris
caused by bullets.
Then it gets more specific. It says, sources
say the officers were hit by either plastic
or metal fragments
when the bullets struck objects nearby. It doesn't
even mention a teleprompter, mind you, which another
one did. So what's going on? How are
2 separate reports from local on the day
getting this information? Where is that coming from?
And clearly, if we know that there are
4 local police officers who got plastic or
metal fragments that hit them, isn't it possible
that Trump got hit by some flood? Yes.
Just to add one more layer of confusing
to this. Or maybe Trump wants to lean
into the bullet because it makes him sound
like a bada. I don't know.
But isn't it crazy that no one else
really cares that are have dug in and
chosen their side?
They were treated at the scene, apparently, and
they were okay to escort Trump back to
the airport aft that night after he was
treated at Butler Memorial Hospital.
Weird, isn't it?
Now here's where many people with partisanship would
then jump to conclusions and tell you what
they know is that I saw our set.
No. The point is that this adds more
confusion.
Trump claims Bullitt. The narrative has become that
he was a is a secret service failure,
which is quite obvious, unless it was involvement.
But every new thing that comes out, like
we're gonna show you next, only adds more
deliberate mudding of the waters. Freddy Pontone has
been doing a great job breaking this down.
Says, Thomas Matthew Crooks paused and we showed
you this image already, by the way,
Where he turned up, he's adding more to
this.
Paused shooting at the president, and this of
course is from corporate media. This is what
the new information is, weird how it keeps
dripping out day by day.
Paused
shooting at Trump for 10 seconds, they claim.
At and which by the way is much
longer than the pa pause that we hear
on the video, so I don't know how
that makes sense. After a local law enforcement
officer, and this isn't about Freddie, Freddie's reporting
what the Washington Post is highlighting.
When after an an officer assigned to the
SWAT team returned fire,
which prevented Crooks from firing more shots
before he was killed. Now, guys, that's there's
no way that can be true. Let me
show you why.
Based on what the
video evidence we have from before.
Do you remember all these? We've shown you
many. This was TMZ that first put this
out.
So, again, the top still shot is of
of crooks of of whoever that is or
crooks supposed to be on the roof,
and
them then on the ground filming this. Right?
From the grass side. So if you're facing
Trump from where they were, this is on
the right side of this building, not the
parking lot side. And he is standing there
watching, and you're gonna hear him. You know,
they're going, guy, I have a gun and
everything. And you hear the shoots and 2
kind of surges.
Then you hear a wait, a pause, and
then you hear him say, he's turning towards
us. And I argue that's what you just
saw in that image. Then you hear one
pop.
And then they go, oh, they got him.
How many times I've said this? Whether we're
talking about what the secret the snipers say
from Trump's side and what the media tells
you happened. 1 in a 1000000 shot, and
we took him down right away. That or
this. Neither of these narratives line up together.
We're getting inconsistencies all over the place from
these narratives.
And by the way, this is real time.
This is video. So you could argue that
there might be something that you can't hear
on this. That would make sense.
But it doesn't line up with what they're
saying. Get out of
here.
And also, by the way, it doesn't line
up with that weird video going around that
apparently Fox News put out where it shows
this head
running on the on the top of the
roof and, like, standing there and bobbing around.
Guys, you can see him most of the
time where he is scooting and crawling up
there and does not run back and forth
across the roof. So I I don't know
where that is. Frankly, I think they fell
for a fake, but I can't confirm that.
What?
What? What?
What?
What
are
you doing? I thought that Whoopi's turning this
way? Be Okay. Okay. Turning this way. Now
that's after the first sir 2 surges of
Josh.
God. Okay. Last one. Clearly from a different
location, it sounds lighter, smaller.
Yes. He's got him. He's got him. He's
got him. And it it's pretty widely reported
that they all kind of saw. That they,
you know, saw the hair fly up is
what we've heard. They shot him. Okay.
So you try to line that up with
what we're talking about here.
Again, from what Freddy's pointing out the Washington
Post is highlighting. Right? That they're saying that
he paused shooting
for 10 seconds. That wasn't 10 seconds. After
a local law enforcement officer assigned to him
returned fire. Okay. So where's that returned fire?
Where's the sound of the returned fire? And
and he says, then after that is when
he was shot dead. Well, that doesn't line
up even remotely with what we heard, and
they're sitting right next to the guy.
See my point?
The last thing we should be doing right
now is assuming based on because we don't
even know if that's true. We don't even
know if the original narrative is true. They've
been dumping
frankly, I think that that is becoming less
likely the more this goes forward.
There's only one entity that seems to continue
to be benefiting from this, and that's clearly
my opinion. And I'm not saying that prove
that Trump faked this or he's behind that,
but it's just the static obvious reality. And
we have to continue to ask how that
makes sense.
He says, according to this new Washington Post
article, 10 shots were fired.
Ten shots. Well, based on our count, it's
9. It's 8 and then one shot afterwards.
I said the very day this started. That
was based on my ears. Now there's a
new video of people saying that they feel
like they can break down a 10th shot,
and so some are arguing maybe that's why
they suddenly figured this out, to hide the
fact that there was another shooter, which is
what some people argue that's mean. It's all
based on independent investigation. Consider it all. But
my point is that it seems obvious
that whatever's happening on the side of the
establishment is this is meant to
be buried.
Lied about, confusing, putting out different narratives, using
the independent media, and those that will follow
along with what they cede them with other
fake news to continue to muddy the waters.
Very interesting. And he adds to this.
Is the Washington Post introducing a 10 shot
theory? Oh, sorry. This is what he put
out there. Because it is true, or is
it a cover up story because the audio
analysis has spotted a 10th shot? Alright. Make
sure you're following Freddie. He's doing amazing work.
He's a great guy.
Very interesting, isn't it? Now here is a
couple of other things. Oh, wait. Was that
the only?
I hope I didn't accidentally close something. I'm
pretty sure there was another one. Well, oh
well. I guess I'm gonna wait on that
then. I thought I had one more video
that I was gonna play, but it doesn't
look like I even have it lined up
so I guess not. I guess I could
be forgetting. But anyway, the point is that
this story guys, the more this goes forward,
I just it just feels like at every
step this continues to get more and more
confusing.
I I feel like it's less certain now
than it was to begin with. And not
not certain that we're being lied to. I
think that's an obvious reality. But what actually
happened,
it it it gets I think we're getting
further and further from the reality. But we're
gonna continue to break down what I think
we can prove.
But this is just, you know, weirdly enough,
this is falling into the same kind of
route routine as we got in, their very,
very classically large manipulated events. That makes sense
because I feel like that's obviously what this
is. But you guys can decide. I'm just
gonna continue to give you what I think
is the obvious, which is that, clearly, I
don't know how we could possibly have no
injury, that I think clearly the angles are
impossible for hitting him in that spot. But,
you know, if you find something that makes
that make sense, like another shooter, I'm all
ears. No pun intended. It really wasn't. But
I I I definitely want to figure it
out, But I get the sense that this
is gonna be buried in partisan division forever.
Pretty much was the point, I think.
So bringing this into the next conversation.
Let me close these real quick.
Is the 2 party discussion?
Actually, make sure yeah. Okay. So this next
one, make sure I don't jump ahead. So
we're gonna talk about this, then we're gonna
jump over to another window for Venezuela. Now
I wanna make sure you guys saw this.
Derek is hosting
this Sunday,
an amazing talk between many people. As he
writes, this Sunday, veterans of the indie media
will be recording an epic conversation on the
2 party deception.
Will feature Whitney Webb, Dan Dicks, TruStream Media,
TLav, World Alt Media, James Corbett, and Derek.
It'll be released next Monday. So sorry.
Recorded Sunday, released next Monday based on on
he posted this yesterday.
Don't miss this. I think it's gonna be
important.
And, you know, if you look at all
the people involved, I mean, quite frankly, I'm
the I'm the I I I actually don't
I don't know how long world old media's
been at it. I think it's been a
long time. But I I either here I
I'm I'm probably the least
I have the least years behind me and
everyone at this table. So just this is
gonna be important to make sure you don't
you don't miss.
Now he also just put out amazing article
for TLab on the first, the co opting
of Bitcoin.
Very unpopular, obviously, in certain circles. Bitcoin, Nashville,
Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and Rumble. And, obviously,
you have GD, JD Vance, the whole overlap
with all of it. And this is an
important article,
guys. It's very well done. And it gets
into not just the actual Nashville conference, but,
like, the the point, the co opting of
Bitcoin rather than the co opting of the
entire space for some Wall Street venture,
which is, guys, it's embarrassingly counter to what
this entire thing was was at least we
believed it was around. Again, not to say
that there was ever from anybody, Derek or
myself, some blind adherence to what we thought
crypto was. I've been questioning every aspect of
this from day 1 and still do.
I also, just like with the conversation of
germ drain theory, keep open the possibility that
there are other angles to be considered. More
so in that conversation, I
sir I believe certainly that there are. But
at this point, my point is that I
don't know whether any one of these things
are the very thing that'll hurt us or
not. That's why I'm very skeptical about all
of it. I don't promote or lean into
any specific cryptocurrency.
My point is that I do believe that
in some cases, like, for example, a Monero
discussion, which is an anonymous aspect,
could potentially be something used to fight against
what they're building.
I mean, I believe that. If you believe
this is about removing anonymity,
controlling their digital
IDs and passports and all the social credit,
well, that's exactly the opposite of what Monero
and different types that could be built would
that would allow you to circumvent those things.
How is that not something to keep open
in your mind? Not to blindly accept anything,
but consider all possibilities. Hey. The premise of
this very show.
The point is you get a lot of
people, like, Derek was was getting he bumped
up against that for so long. People that
act like somehow you're a shill for in
in any way using current cryptocurrency.
And exact though I'm not even gonna name
the person, but the very person who went
on a crusade against Derek got exposed for
using Odysee, which was using cryptocurrency and in
a very embarrassing fashion deleted that account. It's
like, so did you not even look? Did
you not know that? Why would we trust
you if you don't even understand? You know,
that's the point. These people that are act
they're acting like anybody involved with any of
this space is somehow the problem. You may
be right. Maybe the future will recognize that.
But at this point, I truly believe that
a lot of people in this space are
fighting for the opposite of what they're trying
to build. But his point is that it's
being co opted.
Bitcoin entirely looks like it already has been.
Not the actual
possibly, but not the the community itself is
what I'm saying.
Trump stands up and basically clearly doesn't understand
it.
Doesn't clearly doesn't understand how this functions and
and makes it talks about how it's not
a threat to the dollar, except despite the
fact that that's inherently what it was designed
to be.
Because they want this for some kind of
gold, you know, like the idea that it's
an investment to hold like gold. No. This
should be challenging the entire fiat system. That's
what the idea was.
Or ends with saying have fun playing with
your Bitcoin, which clearly is is I think
he's feels insecure about this because he doesn't
know what it is. And it's tip typical
hubris Trump conversation, kind of talking down to
it because he wants to feel superior to
it. The point is that was insulting. Everyone
laughed in the room when he said that.
Not with him, but at him. I was
there. We were at the Bitcoin conference. The
point is that this is a problem, guys.
Great article. Make sure you read it.
Now the re the point in talking about
all of that is that this is what
we're talking about. Whether it's bitcoin, the community,
or any number of other things being,
I mean,
aggressively
engineered through specifically
the republican sphere.
Now don't take that as a one-sided thing.
It's all across the paradigm. But as I
said, it oscillates.
Here's Dan Bongino, for example,
as a journalist,
saying to any established Republicans
attacking JD Vance,
you're dead to me.
Do not ask to come on my show.
Do not call me. Period. Does that sound
like an object? I mean, come on. Really?
So there's just nothing you can say against
this guy that there's a lot you can
point out that's problematic with JD Vance like
any politician. But apparently, you can't he's off
limits. Why would that be? Because they've suddenly
made him a focus and now you're reacting
in the same way on the other side.
So either you can he's the worst person
alive or you're never allowed to criticize him.
How about we find a comfortable middle, Dan?
How about anybody else recognize that there's a
lot that we should be concerned about? The
overlap in funding of Thiel and Palantir overlap
and what that means with Twitter and everything
else. Obviously.
But, nope. You're dead to me.
Doesn't that alarm anybody
that this is where this is going, to
where you're, like, boxing out people? What if
they're right? Damn, what if you're missing something?
Nope. Dead to me. Shut up. Don't wanna
hear it.
That is the 2 party illusion.
And whether that he's blinded by it or
not, I don't know.
Maybe it's his part maybe he's doing that
to manipulate. I don't know. But we should
ask those questions.
Now the bigger point about this is you
can see that it's all the same thing.
The paradigm. That's what we've been talking about.
And whether it's, you know,
boxing people out because they dare to criticize
the the chosen ideologue or the fact that
what the we've been holding the woke right
is exposing itself all over the place.
And if you're somebody that believes in whatever
you believe in and you feel that that
makes you a conservative,
ask yourself how any of this aligns with
what that's supposed to mean.
Like, libs of TikTok
canceling or getting people you know, doxxing people
online and getting them fired for their jobs
for making an insulting joke about Trump.
Not doing anything illegal. In this case, simply
saying, I wish that guy was a better
shot. Yeah. That's a crude and and detestable
thing to say about any human being. But
that's also free speech as we I thought
agreed on, but apparently not. If it has
to do with the guy you're let's shoot
you're protecting. And realize that, the lives of
TikTok went off on this and did it
to countless people
in very, very flagrant fashion. Some that were
just bad jokes.
And I said, you either support free speech
or you don't. Many hyper partisan accounts are
proving that they don't. What this lady said,
and you can look at it, it's all
down here, was detestable. But she has a
right to say it. But here, they are
working toward and then promoting this lady, this
average lady being fired.
Stop supporting partisan hypocrites.
You know that if this was done in
the reverse,
and it was about a joke that a
republican made about any number of ridiculous left
leaning characters, even if it was a joke
that it suggested they should die,
And they and they canceled that person and
got fired from the job. Are you pretending
they wouldn't call that woke cancel culture?
It's the same damn thing.
And if you actually read through this, what's
so crazy to me, is that you could
they point at the tweet that she put
out. And all it says is I wish
she was a better shot. You have people,
high level account that ended up sharing a
fake image that was created that pretended she
said, I'm glad I hope more we got
least one of them and all the Trump
supporters, I'm glad they're dead. They made it
up. They literally photoshopped the thing that they
all ended up sharing so that they didn't
feel as stupid for canceling somebody based on
a bad joke. That means you're also dishonest
and lying to yourself. These that's the problem
in all this. The people willing to do
that on either side.
Here's an example of the same thing happening
now. This one's pretty crazy. You all remember
Kyle Rittenhouse?
Right? Became kind of a I icon for
the right?
Well, Martha Bueno says this.
This morning, I posted a photo of myself
with Kyle Rittenhouse.
I said I was proud of him.
I hadn't been following MAGA drama and immediately
I saw an onslaught of cancel culture directed
at myself and Kyle from the right.
Kyle was speaking out against
Trump's policies
that infringe on the second amendment.
You know, like when he publicly said, take
the guns now and we'll deal with the
courts later. Yeah. Like that.
He wants to make sure that whoever wins
the presidency is committed to upholding the document
that we hold up in high regard. Rittenhouse.
Meaning, the constitution, guys.
She says, well, I'll be voting for Donald
Trump, just to make sure you hear that.
I agree with Kyle and agree with that
our job as patriots, so she's a republican,
is to hold politicians accountable. Rather a conservative,
I should say. I don't know whether she,
you know, the the conservative is more accurate,
I would argue. She then goes on to
say, if worshiping politicians instead of keeping them
accountable is your goal, then you probably won't
like what I have to say.
Good.
She says, cat turd, that famous republican account,
You've shown that you have you are here
to promote Trump,
not to be a patriot. Real patriots put
America first. I love this because what you're
seeing is people within the conservative movement
pushing back against the large republican accounts that
are showing that they don't care about the
things they pretend they care about. At least
when it comes to their chosen ideologue, which
makes them hypocrites.
But there's good enough honest enough people in
there to say, no. I'm not gonna just
let you do you're wrong, and you aren't
you you're not embodying what we all pretend
we're fighting for. Anybody on us should be
able to call that out. Now, apparently, Kyle
Rittenhouse is the scape he is the
persona nongrade of the right right now. Like,
everywhere. It's crazy. Why? Because he dared to
say Trump didn't have the best policies in
one area.
Think about how crazy that is.
And I I believe
I might have that video.
Let's see.
No.
Doesn't look like it.
It's easy to look up really.
Famously said that.
They will take the guns and we'll deal
with the course later.
Here is the images.
He this cat turned saying, after all what
president Trump and his supporters did for him
wait. So you're not allowed to say what
you believe because they did something for you?
Yes. Pay attention, guys. The idea that you're
somehow supposed to be adherent.
Right? Subservient
to the party because look at what they
did for you. Is that seem does that
seem the same as truth,
right, about the facts? Does that matter?
Unfollowed forgotten backstabber sellout. That's what he says.
Cat dirt.
And this is just Kyle Rittenhouse saying what
he believes.
Is that not okay?
And it says, this kid has a point.
He's holding up Trump to account, and I
have no issues with that. Why would anybody?
Unless you're blindly adherent to a certain side.
Team sport politics.
She says if that's if if we all
did that, maybe we wouldn't have the crummy
politicians we do. It's a pretty good point.
The solution to this is for Trump to
promise to uphold the constitution
and repeal all bad gun laws, and then
he blocked her. Imagine blocking somebody who's also
a conservative for simply going, hey. Maybe we
should just make sure he doesn't take our
guns away. Isn't that exactly what you're all
saying?
Guys, this is crazy and important.
It's showing you the reality behind the 2
party paradigm.
Unfollowed, he says to her. And blocks her.
Okay.
Here is what Christopher says. The woke right
is no different than the woke left.
As much as they really try to push
back on this, guys, everybody's picking up on
this. They can't make take any criticism or
accountability of their selective dear leaders.
It's true.
Well, I forget if I read Did I
read what I said on this one?
Yeah. I did.
So here, American AF.
Perfect.
America.
F yeah. That's what it feels like to
me. Breaking.
Kyle Rittenhouse has lost over 20,000
followers this morning.
Think about that. And is expected to lose
north of 200,000. Now I could I could
promise you that that does not have to
do with the fact that everyone's organically seeing
what he says and just oh my god.
I don't agree with that. This is momentum.
This is the party saying,
unfollow Kyle. Here's he's he's against Trump. And
they all just do it dutifully because there's
far too many that follow like that. And
they know that, and that's how TeamSport Politics
works.
200,000
followers yesterday.
It says he was
1,000%
paid to endorse anyone other than Trump.
Oh, you might ask the evidence. He might
have none. Nothing. That's his opinion stated as
absolute fact, Sort of like the people's
voice, terrible website. So what they do is
the partisanship.
Just 3 months before the election, he puts
this out? Nah. Sell out.
Yeah. How dare he express his feelings and
thoughts with honesty and compassion? Yeah. And and
integrity. Yeah. How dare he?
Partisanship.
This person says, guaranteed.
But who paid him? We need to find
out. Oh, now we're on this whole crusade
to find out who paid him about something
that we can't even verify happened.
Building blocks on top of assumptions on top
of assumptions.
My god.
This person says underneath that, keep going, MAGA.
Make him irrelevant.
Who does he think follows him?
I don't know. People that care about integrity
and truth, maybe? I guess not. I guess
people that only care about blind Trump support.
Maybe that's good. Maybe you can drop all
the fake information and fake people and find
the integrity out there, which there are plenty.
You guys are well aware.
And it says second amendment people.
Think about it. He is calling out the
fact that Trump's policies, like I already showed
you
let's see.
Hold on.
Might as well grab it.
Let's see.
Here we go.
Worth showing you since I'm not in a
rush and because the reality being that as
always, unless I put it up there, there's
gonna be somebody out there that just doesn't
wanna admit that it's real.
Okay. Here's Trump.
I do have that I guess. Damn it.
It showed up as a reduplicate. Oh well.
Here it is again.
Go ahead, Mike.
Well, in the category, you you spoke about
it, mister president. Gun, thank you in making
steps, but the focus is no tools, danger
to themselves, rights or trample, and then collect
not Or might order, and then collect not
only the firearms, but any any weapons
in the position that they take the firearms
first and then go to court because that's
another system. Because a lot of times, by
the time you go to court, it takes
so long to go to court
to get the due process
procedures.
I like taking the guns early, like in
this
crazy man's case that just took place in
Florida.
He had a lot of fires. They saw
everything.
To go to court would have taken a
long time. So you could do exactly what
you're saying, but take the guns first, go
through due process second.
Yeah. Of course. Right, guys? Now, of course,
what people that wanna blind support him will
say, no. He only meant the crazy man.
Oh, you the person that gets framed by
the media and the politicians as crazy? Like,
how often does that happen when you're not
crazy? I think we see it a lot.
Now but just because he was crazy doesn't
mean he doesn't have constitutional rights.
I'm assuming we even know the the reality
behind this conversation. The point is that's a
precedent. So you're simply saying when the government
decides, right, not just Donald Trump,
that you can take the guns because you
argue there's a problem. Are we unaware how
obviously that can become a obviously. It's a
but it's regardless of how it can become
a problem, abuse forward, it is a
objective violation of your constitutional rights. Just put
aside due process. That's not supposed to apply
to anybody.
The point is that too many people don't
care as long as you're supporting Donald Trump.
If Biden said that, oh my god, it
would be on forever. It's the same thing
in reverse.
Trump can say something passively with I mean,
you know, not even condemn the right thing,
and suddenly he's the biggest antichrist in the
world. It's it's a same thing on either
side.
We have to see this.
So my point is, when he says, who
does he think follows him? And this person
says second amendment people. They're saying is, look,
people that care about your constitutional rights, and
this person doesn't get it. Agree a 100%.
Trump had terrible people around him, won, but
it won't happen again. Oh, I see. So
you agree,
but also hate
Kyle Rittenhouse for pointing it out, I guess?
Think about the mental pretzel, the mental gymnastics
it takes to try to pretend like Kyle's
a bad guy because he hates Trump, but
then, yeah, but second amendment's good. Well, he'll
do right this time, but, yeah, Kyle sucks.
If you know that Trump what do you
mean he had the wrong people around him?
Isn't that the whole narrative of you gotta
have insiders to fight the inside? You it's
just the shifting goal post is it's embarrassing.
Everybody can see that this is a contradiction.
Of course, when you point it out, they'll
call you a right a lefty or whatever
because that's the only way. It's like saying,
oh, you criticize Israel's policies? You're a racist.
It's the same game, guys.
Here's another comment.
Tries to be edgy, gets canceled.
They're even using the word canceled.
Laughing and cheering about it.
Guys, this is crazy stuff. They're now the
woke right. Or they have been, it's the
same thing because it's the same paradigm. They're
doing the same thing. They just do it
when it applies to them.
And, to bring this into Venezuela, and this
is the larger point.
Just as I said a few days ago,
or I should read him first, clandestine posted
this. He says, I have absolutely no idea
what's going on in Venezuela, but the fact
that the Blinken State Department are coming to
the defense of Maduro's opponent, which they are,
makes me consider that the State Department and
their CIA partners CIA partners
have an interest in overthrowing Maduro. Gee, that's
like saying the sky is blue. That's been
proven by their statements and by, which I'm
sure he knows, and by their ongoing coup
attempts.
Right? So all he's highlighting is that this
is the same thing. He says, however, I
find it ironic that the US can judge
the results of other countries' elections, but we
cannot seem to secure our own.
They claim election fraud exist elsewhere, but have
zero interest in securing our own elections whatsoever.
Because both are the same conversation, guys.
When you can always accuse anybody you disagree
with as stealing the election, when you can
apply that to all of your enemies. When
you have a collection system in this country
that is mired in problems, well, you can
do whatever you want. Just point to the
other side.
That's the same thing that pastor and plenty
of others have pointed out. There is a
system that would be accountable
too as too much as it can be.
There's a reason this thing takes months and
all the and there's 47 different levers and
processes is because it's confusing as it's supposed
to be when it doesn't have to be.
Again, legitimately look at what Venezuela's factual process
is as they keep lying about it. It's
it's exactly the point. And I don't agree
with the biometric overlap. My point is, nonetheless,
it is clearly something that is set up
to be near impossible to manipulate.
It's I we I'll go over today.
Doesn't mean it can't be. I don't trust
Maduro or anybody else. But the evidence is
obvious on one side, and the evidence on
the other is narratives being spun on Twitter,
most of which is shown to be false.
He says,
the state department has motive here, and it
has nothing to do with the fair elections
and what's right. My point is about the
fact that, yeah, it is sort of odd
that both the entire right wing is, you
know,
republican
movement and Elon Musk on Twitter and everybody
else are screaming that this is the guy
where the democrats are fighting for the socialism,
Except they're not though. Except they're over here
going, withdraw bad. We gotta get withdraw out
of the way because he's dick okay. So
how to explain that?
The explanation is that they're all the same
thing. And brief moments like this, you end
up seeing it usually around war and Israel.
And you were usually at war because of
Israel.
Here is the one I put out the
other day before this,
29th, where Blinken came out and said, well,
yeah. We're basically calling out Maduro in the
election as false. And I said, everyone take
note that the right has aligned itself with
the same candidate that the Biden administration also
backs in Venezuela. Despite the framing being the
exact opposite, you're being played.
And Jimmy and I had the same conversation
to a degree, and we talked about a
lot of stuff here. And as and this
is about the right being played about Venezuela.
And Jimmy's thoughts on the the Venezuelan
coup attempt going back a long time and
what the reality is around all this. It's
a good interview. Make sure you check it
out.
Here is Infowars.
Having
the breaking edgy headline that nobody else has
put oh, except all of the corp media
putting out. The American
Journal. Venezuelan's
riot against communist governments after stolen election.
Yeah. That's exactly what the Atlantic is and
everybody all the corporate media is saying. Isn't
that strange? Now they're saying and saying, well,
that doesn't mean they're wrong. There's plenty of
times where I've said things that are aligned
with what a lot of the corporate media
might be pointing out.
The difference is if you actually get into
this,
you'll find that it's kinda the same kind.
It's not it's not some new take. The
point is,
Venezuelans are revolting against their bad guy socialist
government. Right? And they're and they're trying to
get they want freedom. And so the US
government's gotta step in and free them.
That's never been the truth here.
The obvious provable reality, and this is something
that I can almost promise you. And it
that was not for actually, let me let
me see if I can grab this real
quick.
This is an important one.
This is what what a and wake up
talked about this.
Just to show you the lack of due
diligence you're gonna see in this platform based
on numerous people that worked with Infowars. I
am going to share a community story from
our friend, Richard Grove, when he was at
the Infowars studio
behind the scenes because of his documentary that
he just felt making state of mind. And
the commentary that he gave observing that studio
firsthand
was that they don't check their facts. They
basically just run with it, and they do
it way too fast. It's the same reason
that, like, David Knight left the organization because
he's like, yo. Yeah. And the fucking truth
street kids. Yeah. Yeah. So that's the thing.
It's like, it's a nonstop thing. He's been
like this for so fucking long. It's maddening.
It's it's just ridiculous. For for a number
of reasons, but Yeah. But, you know, after
that, I'm losing
recent bullshit. Going on was one of the
reasons Burmas gave for leaving Infowars back in
the day too.
It's pretty interesting.
Just don't forget that. And that's why you
get the because my point is if you
actually look into the information,
like Abby Martin and plenty of others have
broken down for a long time, The people
in this area
very clearly support the people pushing back against
the US occupation agenda.
It's obvious. That's why Chavez, the rest of
them, very clearly graced their rose to powers
because they I look. I'm not gonna say
that everything they did is for the people.
I don't ever use I almost never think
that. But it it let's put it this
way. Just to make the most extreme example.
Let's just say you've got a dictator
who does anything the other the the US
power wants them to at the expense of
the people. Then you've got a dictator who's
just as problematic and just as willing to
do what he wants to enrich himself, but
he also takes measures to make sure that
people benefit from that dictatorship.
That's not complete that's not dictatorship just mean
or let's just say authoritarian. Of all the
power in one person's hands. And they use
it to enrich themselves. But they nationalize the
resources that allow the people in that country
to get free healthcare, you know, like we
saw with Libya and other places.
Think about it for a second. I'm not
gonna say that's not still a dictator. The
point is that, ultimately, you can prove these
people are benefiting from this. Or with the
program that Venezuela had long before they stopped
them from doing it with using their nationalized
oil resources to help other countries in the
area.
Basically, like, no interest loans and all sorts
of stuff. And then the US government would
have stopped to that because they need to
control these industries.
And and on top of that, as we
talked about in the last show, you realize
that the breakdown,
it's not the idea that it's a socialist
country. It's a 13% difference between the amount
of ant the amount
of entities, I guess, controlled by the government
versus Venezuela and the United States.
13% difference.
Mo both of them majority private, not government.
So that 13% makes the difference of what
makes a socialist country compared to the United
States? Apparently so. The difference is that these
Venezuela,
the things that are the government and nationalized
are the natural resources,
which are then used in large part to
help the people in that country. This is
not some conspiracy theory. It's very easy to
prove
based on long term policies. Same thing with
Libya. That's why it's obvious to prove that
they had, nope, free health care, free education,
highest quality of life in all of Africa.
Easy to prove. That doesn't mean he wasn't
acting in dictatorial
ways.
But that's quite a look at what they're
dealing with now.
US sure liberated them right in the slave
markets, didn't they?
So my point is when he's saying Venezuelan's
riot against communist government, that is straight out
of CIA talking points, guys, which is what
I said.
And this person is saying, since when since
when is the Atlantic on the same page
as Infowars? Well, since Infowars started spewing CIA
propaganda, which is what I said. Infowars is
now pumping out CIA propaganda. Lovely. By the
way, I'm telling you,
man. I am I would bet my life
that this sent out when I posted it.
But I don't wanna be a conspiracy theorist.
It's weird. I keep noticing weird stuff on
this platform. But,
lastly, and then we'll go into the larger
talk about Venezuela, and then, you know, shift
windows here. Here's a great clip by DD
Geopolitics.
Elon Musk's hypocrisy
exposed by professor Morandi
around Venezuela in particular, but general hypocrisy.
So shocking to see that image. Elon Musk
literally being an invited guest of prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu. And then can have the lack
of awareness just days later to tweet
shame on Maduro.
Hypocrisy is just so out in the open.
They know quite well who they are. They
know what they are. When he speaks of
Christianity,
he is no Christian. Just like no Zionist
is really Christian. No no Jewish Zionist is
a Jew. Moses
or Jesus would never condone what these people
are doing, carrying out genocide in the name
of Moses or the name of Jesus or
like ISIS in the name of Islam. They
know who they are and they know what
they're doing. They know exactly
what's going on in Gaza. They know exactly
what they're asking for. They know exactly why
they're opposing Maduro or anyone else who opposes
US policy. And I think it's quite clear
that 50 years from now when the world
changes and history books are written, they'll be
presented as,
examples
of, great evil.
There's so many overlaps to the hypocrisy.
Right? I mean, obviously, meeting with a leader
of the the most obvious genocide we've ever
seen and and then just
crying foul about Maduro and and the election.
You know? Or or I mean, by the
way, let's not forget that Netanyahu's been holding
on to power basically illegally for a really
long time, Using war and murder to drive
people into like, and his own newspapers have
covered this. He's got multiple indictments. He should
be in prison. But, yeah, that let's high
five this guy and shake his hand and
come meet invite him and let you you'll
be the personal invitation of that genocidal maniac
to US congress. Give him 58 standing ovations,
but we're gonna scream about something that you
have no idea about. You know, I argue
it's because he sees lithium in that country.
That's my opinion. Here's what Caitlin Caitlin Johnstone
said. It's so wild how every few years
the US just casually tries to install a
coup regime in the oil rich nation of
Venezuela, which by the way again is massive
tons, 100 of tons I believe or tens
of tons of lithium.
Of that the the oil rich nation of
Venezuela and the western political media class treats
this as perfectly normal.
Just every so often just trying to install
a coup regime.
And then they'll have the gall to shriek
about election interference.
If some Russians make some Facebook memes about
a presidential race, really says a lot about
how evil, entitled, supremacist, and stupid western civilization
is.
Here
are some points that I think is worth
your time to see. Before we get into
it, we kinda broke this up in different
different segments.
Elon Musk has been caught lying a lot
just since this Venezuela thing started. Now I
think I will actually start with a point
that I wanted to make sure you saw
before we get into some of these. Hold
on. It's right here.
I think
or no. Hold on. Basically, a point that
he's he started
talking about Venezuela all of a sudden.
When he hadn't spoken about it in, like,
once in a very long time. Oh, I
guess I won't try to find it. I
guess it's not here. You know, it's there
somewhere. Probably already went past it. The point
is, as you'll see in a tweet in
a second,
that apparently not it's not anything about Venezuela.
And then all of a sudden, it just
starts I mean, near constantly pushing out fake
information about Venezuela.
Isn't that interesting?
Well, here, I simply said, once again, Elon
is blindly sharing Zionist propaganda from that Visregard
24 account, which is straight up Israeli propaganda.
Oh, Zionist, really. And I said, by the
way, Elon has now deleted his tweet where
he famously said, we'll coo whoever we want.
Weird. What a interesting timing you do that.
Right?
In other words, the 2 things we'll show
is that
first, this tweet that visregrad has now taken
down and
and Elon has taken down. That's why it's
on the archive. That's why it says it's
deleted. Both his tweet and Viscergrad have been
deleted. Viscergrad deleted it because they were lying
about it and got exposed for it. Then
Elon deleted it after that, took another day.
What this was?
An old video of people taking air conditioners.
How in the world you can't see that?
He's an engineer for crying out, at least
foretold. How you don't know that or the
point is, he's probably knowingly lying or doesn't
care. Bottom line, they posted this as armed
Maduro gangs taking polling stations.
You don't think this has an effect? There's
probably millions of people out there that still
think this proved it. He was lying, or
he didn't realize he was sharing fake information.
The other thing was about the tweet, and
this is Megatron calling him out. You're spewing
fake news. Those are air conditioners.
Here is the post he deleted that goes
back to 2020,
where somebody was calling him out and saying,
you know what wasn't in the interest of
the people? US government organizing a coup against
Bolivia.
He responded by saying,
will coup. We will coup whoever we want.
Deal with it. Here's guard he's the guardian
of plenty of others calling him out for
this. He definitely tweeted it. And then, I
don't know when, but he deleted it.
Doesn't that tell you something?
So whether it's for the lithium in Bolivia
or the lithium in Venezuela or the gold
and the oil, the resources, the bottom line
is that clearly he seems to have an
interest in pushing these narratives, or maybe just
because he's an asset of something else.
All possibilities.
Jamie Dohr interview, we discussed another US led
Venezuelan coup attempt, Elon Musk and the manipulation
of the right. Make sure you check it
out.
So let's get into some of these other
lies. So let's just be clear.
That got deleted and then he deleted it.
So that means he knows it was fake.
And that here he is, blindly quoting the
same account, also lying.
The people voted overwhelmingly for Gonzales, but except
that over almost a 1000 independent observers clearly
said otherwise. Other
opposition entities also said everything was on the
up and up. Weird, though, that the ones
that are invested with the US government agenda
all seem to say the opposite.
So yet again, like with Bolivia, we have
international observers. We have almost everybody involved other
than their assets saying, no. It's all good.
And yet, weirdly, the narrative back backed by
US CIA talking points and very little evidence
is what takes over the conversation.
Weird how that tends to work. Right? It's
amazing how we can't piece this together after
decades decades of nonstop illegal regime change. Right?
Well, here's Vistregrad saying Machado's team post their
audited report of the true election,
showing you they're claiming that Gonzales won.
Even though there's other reports saying things slightly
different, the point is that that's not even
remotely what the actual information shows.
And I simply said, we we got whatever
you think about the no information, the point
is he's yet again sharing from an account
that he already got tricked in or didn't
care. I said despite sharing numerous things from
this account
that have already been turned out to be
false or already turned out to be false,
one of which they even deleted already, you
continue to blindly share their propaganda.
Do you just not care about the facts,
or do you have an agenda here? Hashtag
willku whoever we want.
Sure he doesn't like that.
Here is another one where he goes, hey.
Look at this. They're taking down a statue
of Maduro.
Oh my god. The people this this is
end wokeness, of course. One of the other
accounts that are taking part in this, you
know, same thing, whether cheering on cancel culture
when it's the people they don't like or
probably
boycotting
Rittenhouse because he said the wrong thing. And
so these are just these large same thing
across the board. And the point is they
shared this and it's fake, guys.
They they it's still out. They didn't take
it down. They don't care.
And he says, adios, dictator Maduro in Spanish.
And I said, are you knowingly sharing fake
information or simply not checking any of it?
This is an this is an old video
from 2017.
All of this is easily proven, guys. And
and what's funny is the note was there
and then it was taken away, which is
how this tends to work when it's covering
for people that have ability to manipulate that.
The bottom line is it's easy to show.
And that's why I'll include
Alan McLeod's breakdown of some of the most
egregious fake news, at least as of 29th.
Guys, it's it's everywhere. Oh, here's the one
that they left up. Another one of these
same type of accounts, I mean, therefore I
am.
Except it still has the context on it,
and they they still left it up. It's
a video of a theft of air conditioner
units, not ballot boxes. It's an old video,
and it's not the same thing.
He says armed communist Maduro gangs, storming the
polling stations. It's still there.
Not that much. Now, interestingly, not a lot
of views. I think that's because it already
got shown to be false. He's at almost
500,000 followers.
Look at that engagement.
Because and there Patrick Henningsen calling him out.
Fake news.
These people just they don't care, man. I'm
telling you. We need to acknowledging this and
calling it out. Not to be contentious
or cause cause conflict. But make sure people
see what's really going on. And the point
is that this is one of the many
different things. Now back to this one real
quick. The point is he shared this video
of this statue, but it's old. And this
comes from that same thread. So we're gonna
go through these right now.
So this one is a fake. We already
showed you. Here's one that's gone around. This
well, he's just showing you. This is what
a ballot box actually looks like in Venezuela.
Despite all the weird videos he's seen circulating,
that's what it actually looks like.
He says this video claiming to show huge
clashes between protesters and police is going viral.
But
as
Luis de Jesus and others have noted, the
video is 7 years old. Again, take the
the every one of these you can find.
The links are all included. You can see
it for yourself. Old content being which I
shouldn't need to convince anybody. This happens every
day. Or whether it's a fake video of
Trump getting shot in the ear that they
all share and then delete. It's non stop.
And it's not just the right, understand. That's
just where it's focused on.
Again, and point is that even this has
a fact check on Twitter. And even then,
Elon is still sharing these things. Now this
one says and this is an important one.
Both these next two are very important because
they're the most prominent ones I've seen. He
says this image, which many claim to be
official election results,
has been seen by tens of millions of
people.
It claims that the vote count is a
109%.
Actually,
all that happened is that the 3 minor
opposition candidates pictured got 4.6%
of the vote together,
not each.
Very simple things like that get intentionally misinterpreted
or miss they lie about it. It's a
simple data entry error from someone making an
infographic for TV. And by the way, again,
you can prove this stuff. This is simple
data. These these are not the official results.
The official results add up to a100. Now
there is a conversation about the seeming perfect
percentage of the 100,
a fee acting like that prove and maybe
it does prove. But the point is that
people lean into the assumptive narratives of this,
about what they want it to mean.
Anomalies happen every single time. And I'm open
to it. Maybe he cheated. You you prove
that to me. I'm well, I'll be the
first to talk about it. Not fake information
being deleted, then the next thing being pointed
out is this is the one. Well, they've
been lying this whole time. They got caught
4 times. Why would this then be and
then then when you lean into that one
they're showing, it ends up being some, like,
here's a video of this or here's a
box being taken. It doesn't prove what they're
saying.
The evidence they claim they have is rooted
in absolute manipulation.
Dishonest actors are promoting this to spread the
idea that official results are fraudulent. And this
is the this is the one that has
been literally everywhere.
Usually, a little bit less
resolution, so you can't read the screens. You
that means that someone's doing it on purpose.
People are claiming this image is from the
National Electoral Council.
And the charts of the Venezuelans of the
screens show that Gonzales
Gonzales' victory. I've seen this shared by major
republican accounts
saying, see the screens show he won. Okay?
But this isn't from CNN at all. Rather,
it's from
Merkle,
a a
a different, like, a a grocery thing, and
totally different organization with no access to voting
information.
And if you look at the screens, it's
not even actually what it shows.
Here, the opposition is also blatantly using a
bot network to boost their narrative, which by
the way, that means they're allowing.
Quite frankly, I think this overlaps with Israel
because I'm gonna show you again in a
minute that Israel has literally been involved. Here's
Marina,
Machado in 2018,
writing
writing personally to Benjamin Netanyahu calling for regime
change in Venezuela.
We'll go back to it. I already talked
about it. That's thanks to Alex Rubinstein.
My point is that that means that the
Twitter bot network and Authentix and all the
Twitter is real overlaps, which are still there
despite all the lies that they changed that,
are only making this problem worse. They're just
using it.
Here it is. Showing you that they're all
doing the same that there's your bot network
pushing the same narrative.
And, guys, I'm convinced as b x broke
down that Elon's using it himself. That's why
you get all the, yes. Exactly. I agree.
Perfect. Yeah. You know, the same one word
answers within seconds of each other. I don't
believe it.
These they're they're using this to raise up
certain narratives.
This one is obviously false. That's why they
have to fake it.
Now that's not proven of itself. We've shown
you the rest of it. My point is
that this is obvious that they're lying about
it, or rather just being dishonest about who's
saying it.
Alan McLeod highlights this one again from endwokeness.
Says, I I know for a fact this
is a fake video because I was right
there in this crowd as this video was
taken. It was, in fact, the opposition that
tried to shut down this, Caracas polling station.
A group of over 100 right wing demonstrators
crowded round the entrance to stop people from
entering.
And the point and the guess what I've
been showing you from the beginning? Allen as
well as,
Rania, Kolak, and others, they're there. They're on
the ground. Now you question their intentions. You
should question everybody. But realize that they're are
there. They can see it. They're reporting from
the ground. And just few people that are
you know, most of the people telling you
they know or never even been there.
This one he says, Alan
Elon Musk, excuse me, himself, retweets a photo
reporting to show protesters tearing down a statue.
This is from 2017.
I already told you that one. This one's
this widely circulated image of a man in
Ar, Aragua, quote, murdered by the government, are
completely fake. And you can watch the full
part of the video, which shows him get
up and get on the bike and drive
away, which is what we'll show you.
I believe that's
we'll get to in a second. We'll go
through it. This is just one quick to
go through his thread. Perhaps the most important
fake news is that the opposition actually won
7 to 3% of the vote. The US
government has fueled these allegations.
But he spoke to dozens of American electoral
observers here, and they told a very different
story. He's here it is from impress news.
Guys, this should matter.
Could all of these people be lying? Of
course. But we have to realize, if you
have over 800 international observers from different locations
with different political standings, all telling you that
this is an completely on the up and
up. Historically, Jimmy Carter said this was one
of the most,
it most legitimate elections around in the in
the world.
The process anyway.
I the point is that you have so
many people that were there, who watched it,
who observed it, that was their job, and
they're telling you it was good. Everything was
done right.
We should question it. But then my point
is you have people with a vested interest
in removing this government for a 1,000 obvious
stated reasons, and we're just going along with
what they say?
Doesn't that seem a little bit naive?
Or
self serving?
He says versions of this image which report
to show a police officer pointing a gun
at a defenseless woman and child have been
seen by millions of people. But video evidence
clearly shows that the police officer is unarmed
and is actually waving his arm at her.
Now see, why would you have to do
that? Why would you have to make it
look like he's arming and then a that
looks fuzzy and altered to me to make
it look like not a hand, and then
you watch the video,
and it's obvious.
See?
Now he's got one glove on, it looks
like, but even the other image to me
looks like they've tried to alter it. But
even if they didn't, the point is it's
not accurate.
You're being played by people with an interest
about now, again, like I say, why why
would they have to lie about this stuff
if it was so rampant?
Just like with Israel.
I'm telling you, there's an involvement, there's an
overlap here.
And then he says, this is total nonsense.
He's been speaking with people flying out from
the airport, and it's opening completely normal. Operating
completely normal. There's no takeover of the airport
at all despite being reported that that's the
case. Venezuelans have taken control of the main
airport. The military has refused to fight the
citizen.
It's where do you think this stuff's coming
from, guys? It's being or it's coordinated.
Nicholas Maduro addresses crowds at, the presidential palace,
and he simply says, and as for Maduro,
he just gave a speech tonight at the
presidential palace. Oh, the point was that he's
saying that they refused to fight the citizens
and instead guarding them. The Venezuelan police are
removing their uniforms and bulletproof vest. President Maduro
is rumored to have fled the country. They're
all they're just trying to seed this into
the conversation in hopes that people on the
ground run with it and act differently based
on that changing. It's not true. He's there.
In fact, the stated I'll show you the
stated the public statements from military and they're
all on his side. Just like last time,
the lies didn't work. They got played,
the generals pretended they were gonna switch sides,
and then they ended up staying with Maduro.
It was really embarrassing for the US government.
This is a lie all the way around.
They want you to think that the military
is changing sides so that then people drop
their guns and jump to side they think
they can win.
This is a video. Has 1,700,000
views.
21,000 likes, but it's highly misleading.
And it's a video from 2017.
Dramatic
scene from Venezuela as the Bolivarian
National Guard acting on behalf of Maduro opened
fire on unarmed citizens. See how this works?
It is from 2017,
showing the moment in which a 17 year
old is allegedly hit by a tear gas
bomb.
Guys,
why is it this obvious?
How is it this ridiculous?
And all these accounts being completely raised up
by Elon Musk tweeting and retweeting and sharing
and promoting their blatant lies, and then deleting
it when they get caught.
Elon is aware of this. There's no denying
that. Now again, it's your right free speech
to lie to.
I'm not asking for anybody to be censored.
I think it's important to highlight the fact
that we're being
gaslit by some digital coup right now by
people who have an interest in any number
of things. And they're playing their partisanship
to get it done.
The right is and the Republican, not all
conservative, but the right of the Republican side
of this has bought into this.
Why would they have to lie about this?
Because and again, you think I mean, therefore
I am due to due diligence on this?
No.
He's straight up telling you what he was
told to say or just making it up
because it sells.
Right wing Spanish politician,
Isabella Diaz, jumps on fake on the fake
news bandwagon sharing a 2017 clip as if
it were from this week.
Expect a lot more of this in the
coming days. Again, guys and even Twitter is
calling this stuff out. They're just sharing fake
old videos in order to push the narrative
today.
Same thing. This claim, it claims to show
Venezuelan military massacring peaceful protesters.
First problem is from 2,016. 2nd is from
Turkey.
Oops. Doesn't matter though. Because they're sharing all
of them all over the place. And they're
getting a lot a lot of engagement.
He says Alan McLeod writes, you'll never believe
this, but Alex Jones is putting out fake
news on Venezuela,
falsely claiming Maduro has ordered the arrest of
his opposition opponent.
See how this gets played? Now is an
important time, guys.
I'm not asking anybody to take sides on
anything. But I'm taking you what I'm asking
you to recognize
is that there are people out there that
are either unwilling to do the work,
trying to deceive you for some other game,
or don't care about any of it. They're
just trying to make money.
I'm talking about let me why would Alex
be pointing this out? Either he's being played
by somebody and he's not checking these things,
or he is lying for an an agenda
that he thinks is on his side politically,
or none of it matters. I don't know
why we have to ask these questions. Just
recognize
that that's wrong.
Don't not because I'm saying it. Look into
it. Look at how this ends up. Now
when it ends up that none of this
actually happened, make a note of that and
recognize as they're screaming at World War 3,
they're trying to push you into it.
Allen says, and this is what he says
here,
Now dictator Maduro, like, just think about the
framing of this.
Dictator Maduro, very journalistic of you, man, has
ordered the arrest of the opposition leader. They
just won the election. He has completely taken
the side. This is not journalism. This is
straight up propaganda.
And don't forget, it's exactly what the CIA
wants. It's exactly what the state department wants.
It's what Blinken and the Biden administration are
also doing. So guess what? Infowars, you're now
on the same side as Biden. How's that
feel?
Point is they don't wanna say that. That's
why they'll lie to you about they're secretly
supporting the other side. I've heard that all
over the place. It's like desperate.
And he goes on to say right wing
Colombian senator Maria Fernanda Cabal shares a video
of Maduro's men torturing their opponents.
The problem?
It's actually a clip from a recent Netflix
show called Simone.
This is how stupid this is. And it's
most of all these are being shared by
pretty much everybody in here I just showed
you.
Make sure you're following Alan.
Right? And put question him like you question
anybody else.
Question everybody while considering all of it.
Here is Elon Musk.
Shit Mario Nar Narfall Nahfall.
I always have to say his name funny
every time. I always wanna say Nar Narwhal
like that animal. Naful
is just a he just guys used to
regurgitate her. He's just pumping out narratives that
come from the corporate media or from within
their kind of tangential mainstream alternative media. And
it's all the same thing.
Posters of Maduro being torn down in Venezuela.
Same stuff, guys. They're lying to you.
They're all they're pushing these false information errors.
We already showed you this. Alan McCloud already
broke this down. Here,
Simon Godox unfortunately getting taken by it. Sharing
you the image that we already showed you.
It's a selfie taken yesterday by the government
official. Nope. It's easily verified to not even
be associated with those groups. But, doesn't matter.
Fortunately, you can't be communist in the ballot
box. Sadly, he's played by the whole communist
first democracy.
It's just government manipulation, guys.
Communism, government bad. I think all of them
are bad. But to pretend like only they're
bad because well, I mean, ask yourself this.
Just be the narrative is communism is so
bad, there's no way their people want that
and they're being manipulated into it. Well, you
could prove that's not true. You can prove
that the people want this. And again, it's
not even what they're framing it is. But
let's just see if you can prove that
they all actually wanted this to be the
case. Do you think they would just go,
oh, okay. We'll let you do it then.
Well, no. They just spent the last lifetime
screaming about how communism will ruin the planet.
Okay. So they're gonna
let them do it then? No. The whole
point is they're gonna go after stopping it.
And And the whole narrative is a justification
to do that. So if you just remove
the the narrative that they didn't want is
forced on them, you realize that it's not
really about the care for democracy. It's about
the agenda for the politics.
It's everywhere. And sadly,
I would argue good people fall into it.
And I I pointed out, this is incorrect.
A lot of verifiably false information being amplified
by Elon, but, you know, gets basically no
engagement. Surprise, surprise. Who cares that you're proving
we're wrong? We love the game.
Here's Mario Notfall saying breaking.
Guess what, guys? Twitter removed Nicholas Maduro's government
official check mark. See how that works? So
I said, so now, world leaders are only
official if Elon Musk decides that they that's
the case.
Get ready for the US selection. How's that
gonna work out? He has to dole out
who gets the gray, government check based on
who he thinks actually won?
I mean, I'm not suggesting that this is
this is just the static reality.
My point is simply that this is obviously
an o a centralization of power, and and
republicans have been convinced that it's the greatest
thing ever because he's on your side.
Think about how childish that is.
The reality is that we're watching another centralization
of power, and they're using your team sport
politics like every other time in history to
convince you to support your own subjugation.
And many of the people that are benefiting
and profiting wildly from that continuation, the ones
telling you that Maduro's stealing the election,
don't care.
Because they're stuffing their pockets, they're getting attention,
and they don't care. Or they're just too
dumb to see that they're wrong. But in
any case, it's happening.
Now,
ask yourself,
why? And there's a good point to make
about, you know, ultimately,
what the 2 party illusion stand out within
all of this. What have they been saying
about Elon Musk the whole time? Oh my
god. He's gonna use Twitter to influence world
politics and and elections and and and insert
his own right wing agenda.
Right? Isn't that what we've been hearing? Like,
nonstop since he took over? Weird how that
sudden narrative is not in the conversation
when he's literally
doing that. Funny how that works. Right? So
now Elon's going, you're not in you're not
in troll. You're you're a dictator and I
you're the one I think won. Helmet take
a gray check away.
And CNN and MSNBC, they're not screeching about
how Elon Musk is doing exactly what we
said he would do.
Why isn't why aren't they doing that? Doesn't
that seem odd? Well, I think it's obvious.
It's because this is part of the agenda,
the agenda. Not the left or the right,
but the government
using their tools to achieve what they want,
both Blinken and Biden and whoever else is
on the right side of whatever we're talking
about.
But, of course, when it's only when they
get to
to raise the fever pitch about how the
right against the left, well, then it works.
But now when it's actually part of what
they're achieving, well, we won't even bring it
up.
I think that's very obvious, like most of
this stuff. Just thought that was important to
point out.
Now let's talk about, again, the Israel overlap.
Here's Alex Rubinstein.
Heiling oh, oh, this was the point I
was trying to find a second ago. Elon
Musk had, out of his nearly 50,000 tweets,
0.
None. About Venezuela prior to April. 0. Now
he's tweeting nonstop about the supposed dictator.
When I said Twitter is going full circle
back to the days of Arab Spring as
a tool to toppling governments, this is what
I meant.
Pretty hard to see that.
Now here's another fake news piece. There's these
are the newer ones that have popped up.
He says this video is going viral, super
viral, over 20,000 likes. It claims to show
a Venezuelan military helicopter massacring protesters. Isn't it
funny how all these videos that have come
out are all fake?
He says, but there's two problems. It's 8
years old and it's from Turkey. Now that
is it the way I show that one?
I thought that mean there's been many of
them. I think the other one was also
from Turkey, but it was a different video.
In any case, it's getting a lot of
reach. No. I think that one was included.
Here's another one. Oh, it's the one I
was gonna show you the video of.
Fiorel Isabelle, who you should follow, you've been
doing great work on this, simply shows you
that this is the the first part of
this video has been going around, saying that
this is what they they killed a guy
on a bike. Right? It's it's gone around
every corner of the right wing conversation.
But it it also includes the second part
of the video.
Oh, no. Cut cut to later.
Here he is.
Now if you watch, you can see the
blood on his face.
Right there. He's got the blood the blood
on his side of his face driving away.
That's the guy.
Right there. You can see right there too.
Oops.
It's everywhere, guy. Look, the blood's right there
on the ground. Look.
Nodars. Pretty easy to see.
They're lying to you, guys.
Now this is what's funny is that when
when it's talking about Palestinians getting killed, the
they just can't stop talking about how it's
all Bollywood and fake information, but they never
prove that. Which I'm never in the mind
that it's not possible. Of course it is.
But they say that and they make you
you lean into it. Because well, they're they're
the kind of person that we pretend is
always bad, so we just you just blindly
believe it.
Right? Well, we're in a different situation now
where now you can prove that they're making
these things up and they also don't care.
Funny how that works, but the facts are
always present.
Right? On one side of this, we have
the reality that they're saying this with nothing
to back it up. Now if you find
evidence to prove they're making them, well, I'll
talk about it too. But on this side
of it, they're only giving you the same
fake information and every one of them is
shown to be from another time false information,
faked images, because that's it's it's almost always
projection.
Right? The the people that are genociding, they're
saying no. It's just like Israel does. Every
accusation is an admission.
So this is what they are, it's what
they do. Usually who they're doing it to,
they project that onto them.
No. The one I already showed you here.
The right wing. This is just their, Maria
Fernanda Cabal sharing a video claiming it's Maduro's
men torturing opponents.
It is from a Netflix show.
How embarrassing, guys. I mean, how absolutely ridiculous
these people are. And it's working because people
like Elon Musk are
What's the right word for it? I don't
know. Raising this to the very top.
Here's Ian Miles Chong.
Now, what Elon's been trying to do the
last so many days, in my opinion, because
I think he he recognized he got caught
sharing fake information, all my opinion.
He's trying to kind of water this down
with, like, I'm kind of just trolling. Right?
I'm just playing a game. We're kinda going
back and forth with with Maduro because we're
just having fun. It's not, guys. It's not
fun. He's driving very aggressive action. And you
can clearly see those statements are not, yay,
we're playing at this. He's going dictator. You
should be removed. You're not the real leader.
We're removing your check mark. So it's not
a game he's playing, guys. It's not fun.
But here you'll see some of these examples
where he's trying, I think, trying to make
it seem that way. E. Miles Chong says,
Maduro gives direct orders to his security forces,
instructing them to keep Elon Musk out at
all costs.
A donkey dictator is delusional enough to think
that Elon is going to personally show up
and blah blah blah. But he says he
is afraid. How are these goons going to
stop space lasers?
So he's trying to make a joke.
Right? But the point is that there's so
much flooded information about that and the
overthrow of the government or the attacking of
their people, the starving all the lies they're
putting out. That people are also believing this.
But then he comes out and says, I'm
coming for you, Maduro. I will carry you
to Gitmo on a donkey. He's trying to
make it funny. But realize, before this little
exchange,
they'd already had a real exchange.
And I'm gonna show you some of them
right now. It's not a joke. Maduro is
literally calling him out.
And of course, this says, well, there's no
mention of Elon in that video, which is
not hard to wrap your mind around. But
my point was hiding your ongoing propaganda push
for a clear regime change Venezuela
under a flimsy veneer of trolling or making
jokes is very transparent.
Here's what Maduro just said.
Elon Musk. Whoever messes with me,
dries up. Whoever messes with Venezuela, dries up.
He says Elon Musk.
You wanna fight? Let's have it, Elon Musk.
I'm ready.
I'm not afraid of you. Let's go at
it. Whoever whatever you want. That's as in
Crockett. The point is, they've been going back
and forth about Elon Musk saying he'll chicken
out. I accept. Like, you know, playing it
like this is sort of a back and
forth. And maybe he is kinda just trolling
in regard to that one statement, but that
does not mean that everything he's tweeting about
is some kind of in good fun or
lighthearted.
He is literally
driving people to fight for a regime change
that are that every single one of these
tweets is hurting people on the ground,
prolonging their suffering that's being done by the
the government Elon Musk works for.
That's the reality.
Here is another example of that.
Both of them try to pretend it's the
game over here. Here's a real post.
The bull in regard to what they've claimed,
they're looking these are, you know, they're manipulating
the situation. E. Miles Chong says the Bolivarian
National Guard of Venezuela defies Maduro's orders, suppressing
the protesters and joins them in their march
toward lies.
They are lying to you. It's easy to
prove and Alan the Cloud has broken this
down across the board.
Elon Musk, of course, blindly shares it saying,
if the military supports the world of people,
it's over from Maduro. And then you get
all these, they mean, therefore I am, all
the rest we already showed you. Pumping out
the fake information, show pretending like they're at
the airport. They're taking over. That's what he's
trying to show you.
That was this one.
Right? Lying about this. Why? Maybe that's because
Elon said it, so they're trying to make
it a reality. Who knows?
But it's become a fake news fest. They
have a right to lie. No one should
be censored for it. But the bottom line
is he is creating the very thing that
the media said you would become.
Ask yourself that, Republicans, playing this game.
I agree. I'm not gonna call for your
censorship, but you think they're gonna stop?
Elon Musk is like the pied piper of
you guys losing yourself into the censorship. He's
literally dragging you along and making you exactly
what they said he would make you. Isn't
that funny how that works out? The reality
is that this is all it means to
an end.
And Danny Hopfong responds to him saying, you're
openly backing a US coup, but it will
fail. The military has long stood with the
Bulgarian revolution, which is very obvious, with a
democratic process celebrated by Jimmy Carter with the
gains made for the poor. You won't get
their oil, Elon. Their wealth your wealth doesn't
make you any less of a loser. This
is his opinion. I honestly think it's more
about the lithium.
But stuff like this.
He literally post this by the way, this
ridiculous looking screenshot image, which literally does come
from the state department.
Ridiculous.
Like, you think they're all their, you know,
1,000,000,000,000
of dollars that they steal from you, that
they would able to be using something that's
better than, like, a 1990
95, you know, desktop printout. This is, like,
pretty stupid looking. The point is it says
he says, this is real. And it says
narcotics reward program offer.
The Department of State Bureau and International Narcotics
Law Enforcement Services offers a reward of $15,000,000,
United States dollars, to information leading to the
arrest of Nicholas Maduro. Right? Because he's a
narcoterrorist.
Right?
Right. Even though he the the country exports
a shockingly less amount than what Colombia exports
in regard to cocaine, that's what we're talking
about.
And Colombia is a very staunch partner of
the United States government, so we just pretend
it's not happening.
But his cocaine, we don't like, so we're
gonna why? Because you don't profit from it?
You don't control the flow of that cocaine?
I might I don't even know whether Maduro's
involved with it. It wouldn't surprise me. But
how dumb it is to pretend like that's
the thing we should care about? Elon, you're
either a complete stooge in this or you're
part of the problem.
And he then posts to the state department
website you can look after yourself. But weird,
it's a poster. That's it. It's a poster.
There's no information. It's just a random poster
all the way from 2021, mind you.
It's just a it's just wild to me,
guys. On a real note serious note, it
is absolutely wild to me that anybody falls
for this, that people can't see right through
how obviously we're being gamed right now. And
maybe you all do. Maybe everybody out there
is like, we all see it, and it's
only the screamers and the paradigm that don't
care about truth at all that are dragging
this thing forward. But my god, are they
getting reach, and it's affecting people in the
world. At the very least, it's affecting what
people see us as Americans as. And I
care about that.
Now some a few more point concurrent points
from from kinda the Alyssa 30th, but more
after what we just went over.
Let me close this for you real quick.
Allen says the protesters in Venezuela that Elon
Musk at all support
have set fire to a hospital tonight. So
this is about the people that they are
the opposition side of this. And I'll play
a video from Abby Martin who talked about
this. These people I mean, guys, look at
the opposition they support literally anywhere. Look at
the Azov movement. Look at the moderate rebels.
Look at anybody they support
around the they are the worst people on
the planet
because
they're willing to do whatever they want. That's
why they will end up, like, as I've
as has been pointed out over the Israel
conversation. The United States and Israel have supported
and funded the worst elements of exactly what
they claim they're fighting in the Middle East,
including,
by the way,
on the record.
But, yeah, we don't talk about that.
The point is that these people were gonna
show you as we've shown you in the
past conversation of these regime change efforts in
Venezuela, like with Guaido, like getting caught throwing
malt off cocktails on the very thing they
claim they were delivering, which turned out not
to be food aid but full of barbed
wire and wood. It was the US government
manipulation. And they're using aid as a tool
just like we saw Israel do with US
support.
Guys, you have to understand how obviously consistent
this is with what they always do. So
you're gonna find these people that they're funding,
that they're supporting, raping and murdering and burning
buildings down and burning people alive because that's
who they support.
Because it'll get the job done. I think
they thought in the past, but now it's
not working.
Right? It's just sheer violence and horrible things.
And in say Israel seemed to think that'll
work.
Hospitals have traditionally been a favorite target of
the Venezuelan right wing.
The video just shows the hospital burning, people
running through there. And this is being reported.
I mean, you can and here's Venezuelan analysis.
Who, by the way, you should follow. Breaking
this down. Clearly from a Venezuelan,
you know, lee I I would argue the
side of Maduro perspective, but they're a good
platform.
He also shows that the right wing Venezuelan
pseudo journalist,
Eduardo Manoni,
is openly calling for an army of his
followers to find and kill Jackson Hinkle.
Just think about you know, just it's just
he's side of these things that are it's
it's just like the the kill list in
Ukraine,
What Israeli IDF members are doing to anybody
is not on their side. I mean, it's
just it's the same thing everywhere.
Calling for him to be killed. I'm not
I mean, I disagree with a lot on
what Jack Sneagle does. But But it's just
funny how he's a right character on this
who is being called out by the very
people that either, you know, the right is
endorsing.
This is a warm welcome code for oh,
and the point is they say, well, it
says the gringo communist Jackson Hinkle was in
Venezuela to whitewash the murder regime of Nicolas
Maduro.
People in Venezuela identify him and give him
a warm welcome. And what he's saying is
that's a code for burning somebody alive. And
I have heard that before, but I can't
confirm that in the case of what he's
saying, what he thinks in in regard to
Eduardo. But the point is these are people
that are like we've saw we saw with,
the the list from Ukraine.
And, like, Gonzalo, the people that got got
identified and then they got arrested by the
very same people. That's what he's doing.
So if something happens to Jackson Hinkle, you
know where to point. Fiorella Isabelle points this
out. Breaking the Venezuelan opposition continues to push
for a color revolution and return to guar
guarimbas, the violent op protests.
The government has arrested,
most of the assailants according to the Venezuelan
defense minister, there's 23 wounded. Now, of course,
the ones they arrested they call political persecution
even though they were murdering and and acting
in political violence.
Now you can, read through the most of
these. All the different attacks
and different evidence, the people they're taking down.
Megatron highlights this, breaking criminal gangs threaten Maduro.
This was put out publicly by the way.
The leader of the criminal gang, Trendel,
Yano maybe, in, Goraco states
state has released a video threatening Maduro's forces.
Once again, who funds the terrorist and criminal
gangs around the world. But we know this.
We know who does. We know it's the
people supporting them like Elon. We know it's
the US government and their and assets through
them that they're supporting. That's it's it's unquestionable.
Wait we already Oh, I'm gonna play you
videos from from,
Elliot Abrams and and and Bolton who proudly
tell you what they've done in the past.
It's the same thing happening right now. Oh,
wait.
It says good evening, people of Venezuela. We
are making this video to make a call
to the armed
forces and the public forces in the state.
We don't want to generate more violence.
My advice is that
is that by listening to the people
what? There, I missed something right there. I
don't know why this is working. Good job,
Twitter.
What is going on?
They they behead themselves in their command and
let people decide.
This is a call, a warning. I don't
want violence. I don't wanna generate homicide. I
don't want to generate death. We are not
generators.
If they don't get caught in their commandos,
we are going to use everything
we have and all my people in the
entire state, we have we're going to start
attacking the officials. So just but despite starting
with we don't want violence, his point is
we're going to attack the the officials.
Don't touch the people, respect the people, respect
their decisions, which by the way is the
opposite of what always happens. The point is
though these are people that are coming out
openly saying, we're gonna use violence against the
elected government because we you know, whether they
believe they won or not. Isn't this what
the US government and Biden's administration in particular
just got them screaming should never be the
case? Political violence and so on? Of course,
it only said they only say that when
they don't get what they want.
Or when they do anyway. Maduro's speaking on
the violent fascist opposition paying drug addicted people
a $150 a day to start disruptions and
violence. He told Chavistas not to engage, but
said that behind them, there are gringos, US
people, who have been executing the attacks to
destabilize Venezuela. Now that's Maduro. Take it with
a grain of salt. But much of what
he said last time turned out to be
exactly what was happening.
Camilo points out, Venezuela defense minister says, quote,
we affirm the most absolute loyalty and unconditional
support to Maduro. Constitutional president, and,
the constitutional president of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela, our commander in chief, legitimately re re
reelected by the people's power.
Right? So maybe they're lying. The point is
that this if you really lean into this,
it's pretty obvious that the majority of people
are supporting him. And and almost all the
things demonstrating the opposite, that they're going, see,
this proves you're being lied to, have been
turned out to be false.
WikiLeaks highlights this. Venezuela's
right wing opposition and US media outlets claim
there was fraud in the July 28th election
based on an exit poll done by US
government linked firm, Edison Research,
which that's the one you keep people showing.
Now I mentioned the weird, you know, percent
the say, claiming that the 100% was too
perfect, that's an indicative of of manipulation, which
it might be. And, you know, that would
I would agree that would be an indication.
The point that WikiLeaks is making is that
that group, which is what that's from, works
with the CIA linked US State Department programs.
And they're straight state propaganda organs and was
active in Ukraine, Georgia, and Iraq.
So gee, I wonder if they have an
interest in making a certain thing happen.
I mean, guys, it's like the OAS and
the rest of these groups they point out.
They don't have legitimacy. They've already shown themselves
to bend when it comes to whatever the
US interest is, the government. So now
WikiLeaks is showing you that the group that's
claiming that this is what the results show
works with the CIA. Same with Machado and
the rest of the people we're talking about.
Now here is what a former CIA member,
and then, you know, quote, former, is telling
you about the reality here. They never they
didn't care then. He he doesn't believe they
care now about supposed democracy.
CIA, we didn't give a hoot
about
democracy.
I mean, it was fine if if a
government was elected
and would cooperate with us, but,
if it didn't,
then democracy didn't mean a thing to us,
and I don't think it means a thing
today.
Right. Listen, guys.
That's the I mean, don't believe for a
second that they care about these things.
Craig Pasta, friend of the show,
who, by the way, is this is what
he does. Right? Go International Election Observer, as
well as being independent media. He says, there
have been a lot of accusations of fraud
by the opposition in Venezuela as well as
the mainstream media here in the US. However,
the accusations are very broad. And if there
was cheating taking place, it would have been
caught in real time. Now we briefly went
over what Fiorella pointed out. And this is
just in in text what she was breaking
down. And I I mean, I probably should
have gone over at the time but I
just
long show as always. I made sure I
included it for you. But it was she's
right. It was very technical. Right? And there's
just a lot. And but it's included in
the last show. Now she goes through piece
by piece how the technical system works. He's
gonna break it down for you here again.
He says,
the Venezuelan election process is one of the
most transparent in the world, which again, even
Jimmy Carter made a point to say that,
with checks and audits conducted with paper trails
within the purview of the public. So he
says for the Chavistas to cheat, they would
have, quote, number 1, have had to known
all of the 55%
of the machines that were going to be
audited because they they apparently, which is unprecedented,
they they audit 55% of everything there. So
they would have had to have known
what 55% would have been audited. They would
have had to know which 5 point 5,000,000
votes that were to be hand audited against
the machine or to not get caught. That's
almost as impossible as an as as the
astronomical amount of votes that flipped the election
for Joe Biden in the middle of the
night against Donald Trump in 2020. Remember Kevin
Sorbo's tweet
saying, quote, yeah. I flipped a coin a
100000 times and it came up heads every
time. Believe me. I agree. It's impossible. My
point is they always cheat on all sides.
That was just a very flagrant example. But
it says number 2, it also means that
the Chavistas if for the Chavistas to cheat
Chavistas to cheat, since Nicolas Maduro won by
700,000 votes,
that they would have had to flip had
to have flipped a minimum
of 1,400,000
votes. Number 3. Meaning fraud
would have been evident in real time. Machines
would have been flagged, pictures of the tallies
posted on the on doors would have been
taken, and the opposition would have demanded that
specific machines be audited. We didn't see that
in Venezuela.
And he was there. My expert assessment is
that the Venezuelan general election was in their
indeed fair, and the chosen leader by the
people is Nicolas Maduro. And, of course, you
could argue that every one of those things
certainly could have happened.
But what he's trying to explain for you
and, again, the people that don't wanna hear
it are gonna deny all that. They just
cheated. They did all that. Whatever. Without any
evidence to back it up. The point is
of how wildly unlikely that is. And if
you really dig into it, it's not that
Maduro's government controls all these pieces. It's not
the case. It's easy to show that these
things I mean, I I agree. That would've
been very, very, very, very difficult for them
to pull off. And let's get into some
other points about why this is never the
reality. About the fact that he is very
popular. And literally all it seems that a
lot of the things that have been shown
in the past is their attempts to try
to
stop outside efforts from doing the things they
know they've always tried to do.
Just like we see
the narratives are the same.
The history is obvious.
The US government has tried to overthrow this
government countless times. So knowing that as an
absolute objective fact, don't you think they might
try to bolster themselves against that?
And then when they do, they point to
that and they say, fault fraudulent.
Even though this is what we're dealing with,
which is easy to prove.
Alan McLeod points out that the Carter Center
has denounced the election in Venezuela. But he
goes first, we must remember that it is
far from a neutral organization.
Consider,
it is based in Washington DC. It's directly
funded by the state department and USAID. For
me, that's more than enough to see that
it's obviously potentially influenced,
as well as by the governments of Saudi
Arabia and Qatar.
Very objective. Number 2, it is staffed by
former US state officials and by anti Venezuelan
government hardliners.
Easy to prove. Its former America's America's dictator,
Jennifer McCoy, it for instance,
compared to Hugo Chavez to Donald Trump. He
she did. And said he was as much
a dictator as Pedro, Carmona, the oligarch who
came to power for 2 days during the
2002 queue queues. Excuse me.
Again, this was the not to get into
it. It's get people get all in up
in arms about whether Chavez was removed for
a momentary moment. But the point is the
Carter Center has consistently refused to even acknowledge,
let alone analyze, United States interference in Venezuelan
politics. What does that tell you? I'm gonna
play for you where Bolton and them laughingly
admit doing that. So we know it's the
case.
Any well, it takes anybody's eyes can tell
it's the case. But it says the words
United States appear only 2 times in the
last 8 years of its published reports on
Venezuela.
Number 4. It has, in the past, presented
data about elections in and media in Venezuela
in a widely distorted manner.
And read the article here for yourself.
And then, of course, we get just them
standing up, taking the microphone, and screaming, we
won and we know it. That's Machado.
Machado, who again, literally asked Netanyahu to overthrow
the government back in 2018, because that's what
normal democracy lovers do. Right?
So here
is Abraham l
a a Jesus.
Abraham
Elliot. Elliot Abrahams. God, I don't know why
I was trying to remember without looking.
I couldn't remember it on the fly the
other day and it got stuck in my
head.
The guy that I think looks like some
kind of gremlin or or like something out
of Lord of the Rings.
He and and usually I wouldn't even be
that, you know, directly mean, but I think
this guy's a war criminal so I don't
care.
Afshin Ratzani from going underground
breaks this down for you and says, look.
Don't believe the US collapsed Venezuela's economy and
created the humanitarian crisis?
Well, hear it from Donald Trump's special representative,
Elliot Abrams,
who at the time, as we were talking
about this in the last coup attempts, we
broke this down for you. This is a
guy that goes back a long time. He
was previously involved with other regime change attempts
all around the world. So is Bolton. And
then Trump puts him in place directly. I
think he was given the special representative status
for Venezuela. That's how stupid this was.
Yeah. Get Trump get the right people with
the right people for the agenda, it seems.
He says, here he is gloating over the
US's ability to prevent Venezuela
from selling its oil and gold. Says goal
of sanctions is to, quote, deny the regime
money, laughs, while describing the draconian measures
against creditors.
We have a wide broad sanctions net, he
says.
Excuse me.
And to be careful not to get caught.
Now, of course, he balances he, you know,
counterbalances
this with, well, they're such bad evil criminals
that we do this to get back to
democracy.
The bottom line is always, this should not
be their the US government has no place
to be involved in this no matter what's
going on. Like, as as Jimmy said in
our interview, doesn't matter whether he's stealing election
stealing the election or not. It's not the
US government's place to stick their fingers in
and say we're gonna uphold democracy while they're
doing the same thing all over the world.
It's obviously not their interest. Their interest is
control,
suppression,
subjugation.
But the bottom line is we should not,
as a government, as a country, be involved
with their with their poll with what they're
dealing with.
It's just so transparent that they're you know,
the point is that no matter how much
you wanna frame them as being the bad
guy, that's why it justifies this. I mean,
look at what the both sides of our
governor are doing right now. We have to
break democracy to save democracy. It's like the
same narrative everywhere. They all think we're that
stupid. What you're gonna hear is him rationalizing
the very thing that starve his population, the
very thing that drove the caravan
as Bolton will actually admit to in the
next video. The main purpose is is to
deny the regime money,
that it does not use for the Venezuelan
people. Some of it ends up in foreign
banks, and
much of it is used simply to keep
the regime in power.
So the first thing we did
By the way, none of which is true.
I mean, maybe to some degree. The point
is that you can prove, as I have
done many times in the past, that what
they were using that for in a lot
of ways, including the national resources, was given
to lots of people and was used in
in no no interest loans to a lot
of other countries that were also under the
thumb of the US government.
That guy it was a it's an international
program. It was very transparent.
And they stopped that when they stole everything
and put sanctions on them. The point is
that that is obviously showing you they're not
just pocketing all the money. I mean, whether
they were pocketing money or not, they were
also helping the people. They were also helping
other countries. That's my point about the original
thing about, you know, whether it's a dictator
that does what the US wants or a
dictator that helps people as long as, as,
on top of being a dictator.
Obviously, the people would want the latter, whether
a dictator or not. Right? That's the overall
point. And I'm also gonna go as far
as to say that I don't even think
that's really what represents what these people are.
I don't. And the evidence is why I'm
backing that up. But I wouldn't question that
any government would be capable of these things,
but evidence matters.
Was we stopped paying them. You know, the
largest source of cash had been the United
States,
buying about half a 1000000 barrels a day.
We have had conversations
with foreign
oil traders, with foreign governments,
really along the same lines. That is,
you should be
buying oil from this regime and giving them
cash.
Now right there is what I made a
point earlier. So in the past, you've seen
the US try to put Venezuela in the
position they have with all the other vassal
states. Right? Where that's the dynamic. Where
we demand that you do this, you do
it this way. We buy it from you.
We use it. Right? And then at the
end of the day, you don't benefit internally
from that resource. And then you end up
in a position where we can decide to
put you out. You're not doing what we
want. We pull that rug out. We don't
let anybody else buy it. And now you're
in a bad position.
Instead, what they want is to actually benefit
it within
and, you know, other allies and countries, not
allow them to take control of their resources
and keep them under their thumb.
And now you see, or you saw then
and you're seeing again, how they use that
tool. It's not as promote as prominent as
you see from some of the countries that
have been literally occupied for a long time
and then try to push back because Venezuela
has been constantly pushing back. But it's still
present. You still see them using their coercive
measures. Fine. We won't we won't buy it
from you. Or we won't let anybody else
buy
from you. How is that their right? Because
they wanna put this person in power. Just
because they name him democracy or president doesn't
mean that that's what that represents. That is
coercive financial measures to force in your person
who will benefit you at the expense of
Venezuela,
otherwise known as democracy.
And we've noted that we have
a wide
broad net,
with our sanctions. And so we've warned people,
be careful,
not to get caught in that net by
activities that you may think don't come
into it, but actually are caught by it.
So we
and I think we've had a fair amount
of success, I would say,
in getting companies to
reduce the amount they're buying,
in some cases,
end
the purchase of, oil from the regime.
There were some grace periods. You know?
So what's important right there to hear?
I think this is actually really important. They
had a fair amount of success, I would
say, in,
in getting companies to Basically,
set cash the wide net.
Right? So you put this
this broad, ambiguous thing out that says, like,
well, be careful.
You know? Yeah. Yes. We say the oil.
Right? But you don't know. I mean, if
you buy this product, maybe that's somehow included,
and you won't even know, and you'll stumble
into sanctions and all of a sudden, you're
getting attacked by the US government. Don't make
that mistake. So what do they do? They
air on the side of caution and they
just cut all co coordination,
any engagement they had.
Venezuela gets cut off. You know who suffers
when that happens? The people of Venezuela.
And what do they do? They go, look
at them starving. Look at what Maduro did.
Why? Because you hate Maduro, so you took
action to hurt him. And then because he's
the one that made you do it, it's
his fault? Yeah. Stop hitting yourself. It's the
same old game that they do with everybody.
They like Maduro and the rest of them
starving Iran. And then saying, you do this,
your people will starve. And then blaming them
for starving. It's the same exact thing. These
are monsters.
I and look, to be honest, understand, the
monster to the level that I I feel
like I can prove to you that they
don't believe that they're doing this for good
reason. This is just the lazy narrative they
put out to make you think they're doing
the good thing because they kind of admit
to themselves that they know we want that.
But disdain you for it. Hate you for
it.
The broad net is criminal. It's terrorism. This
is financial terrorism.
Reduce the amount they're buying,
in some cases,
end,
the purchase of, oil from the regime. There
were some grace periods, you know, when we
when we introduced the,
sanctions, which Why do they have this right?
Why do they have this right to do
this to anybody?
It's not your decision to make about what
other countries should to do with Venezuela. Whatever
you think of them, whatever the reality of
their government,
this is the world police. This is what
they pretend they're not trying to do. But
they're desperate and frothing at the mouth of
control. To which we're coming to an end.
But it is correct that we have attempted
to prevent the regime
from, I would say, stealing the assets of
the Venezuelan people and making off with them
by getting cash in exchange for oil and
gold.
Yeah. Somebody put points out in the chat
actually. That's that's what it was. Gargamel. He
looks like Gargamel. I remember make I remember
talking about that during the show. Straight out
of the Smurfs. He's definitely one odd cat.
And here
is also Asherin sharing John Bolton. And I
got 2 of them actually. He's this guy
is so proud of himself. Like, that's the
thing is I think he gets off on
being able to casually discuss discuss the thing
that we're supposed to pretend isn't happening.
It's just John Bolton is, like, the worst
person alive in many cases. Like, this guy
is so aggressive
about and just, like, unabashedly
just murder people for freedom or whatever they
wanna frame it as. This guy is just
seeding like, I think, you know, it doesn't
matter. Caitlin Johnson has got all kinds of
names for him. He's just stating his bloodlust.
That's what I think. And he says Donald
Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, in 2019.
All under Trump, by the way, in this
case, our sanctions on Venezuela have frozen 7,000,000,000
in PDVSA's assets. That's the company. And that's
the the overlap we talked about with giving
these no interest loans
from that money to other countries.
And will cost Venezuela $11,000,000,000
of lost revenue next year. Right. And then
so when they all of a sudden start
struggling financially, their economy crashes, look at how
bad they are.
Which is what they did. And he's where
he points out, socialism destroyed Venezuela, US sanctions
did. Whether or not you think that socialism
ult socialism ultimately would've done that. That's just
a personal choice based on the fact that
you've been raised to think that flavor of
authoritarianism is the one you're supposed to hate,
and this flavor of authoritarianism over here is
the one I love because that's what I'm
told I like.
It's all government. It's all power that can
collect to the top and put you in
look at what we're living through right now
in this country. It's amazing that we can't
get past this binary way of thinking.
They did this and then blamed the bad
guy that you're supposed to think is bad,
and everybody lapped it up. Turn the, podium
over to Steven Mnuchin. For this purpose, we're
gonna announce sanctions against
Petrolius de Venezuela
Sociedad ANIMA or PDVSA
as it's known by its Spanish acronym, the
state owned oil monopoly.
We have continued to expose the corruption of
See, they love to frame it as state
owned like that's somehow enriching Maduro.
The reality is what they're doing in this
country is enriching the corporations
of which they all have a c a
part in. But pretend like that's not obvious.
Right? No. No. We're in the gov we're
the government. We don't have we're not corporations
even though today, the whole public private partnership
is challenging that game.
The idea is that they're going, well, you
know, we're the government. We're we're doing this
to benefit our our capitalism.
Right? Except
all of them have stock in that company.
Oh, I'm on the board. What do you
know? Oh, we're in a war. Look. We'll
give all the contracts to them. It's not
us. It's their company. It's just such a
scam. It's such an obvious manipulation.
So when they frame it as state back
they try to make it sound like it's
enriching himself. The point is you can easily
show that these are assets that are in
many ways helping the people.
The opposite of, you know, big oil companies
and big merchants of death using your resources
to benefit their stock price and also the
politicians that you get nothing from. Other than
things being taken from you and your life
being put in more danger.
Think about it for a second. Don't let
the word socialism blind you to the reality
of what's in front of you. All government
can do all of these things. Douro and
his cronies and today's action ensures
they can no longer loot the assets of
the Venezuelan people. See? We expect in sec
What's so bad about that is so many
people on the ground are the ones screaming
about how blatantly
misrepresented
that is.
And then they get they just only focus
like in any other part of the world.
They're oligarchy
that's being put out over in Venezuela because
they're not getting the benefits of what the
oligarchy like is in this country, which is
what we live in. Right? Where you have
that obvious fascist to go overlap where they're
allowed to do whatever they want at the
expense of the people, and they don't benefit
now.
Even if that means Venice Maduro benefits to
himself more than before, the point is that
the people have more of a benefit than
the oligarch here, at least the same.
They want to be enriched. They wanna sell
this country out to the outside corporations and
let them reap what they always do, and
then act like that's the people.
Yeah. It's a small percentage of the very
wealthy people, but it's not the people. Kerry
Mnuchin will go into this in more detail
that today's measure,
totals $7,000,000,000
in assets flocked today, plus over $11,000,000,000
in lost export
proceeds over the next year.
Now this one is just the one that
kills me.
Just
chuck laughing it up with CNN.
Just
so full of himself.
By the way, we're not supposed we're supposed
to I mean, on the record,
a coup is supposed to be illegal. That's
not changed. You You don't say, well, it's
a coup for freedom. You know? I mean,
it doesn't the point is if you're doing
that, you're you're illegally removing somebody from power.
Not through the United Nations, which is how
we're supposed to pretend this all works,
but it's it's just blatant right now. Right
on the surface.
And my point is that here he is
on this show
from 2022.
Just yucking it up about how he's done
many regime changes in his life, which by
the way, anybody with a brain knows,
but how brazen he is with it.
It's disgusting.
Oh, that I agree with to to be
to be, fair with all due respect, one
doesn't have to be
brilliant to attempt a coup. I disagree with
that as somebody who has helped plan coup
d'etat.
Right. I disagree because I'm very smart, and
I have to I wanna praise myself because
I've done them, which and I'm very smart.
That's why. Right? It's just so funny. It's
almost like you got goaded into admitting this
thing. Like that show honestly these people in
many ways tend to be very petty, small
people. Very insecure.
Who knows why? It's not let's say with
a lot of very famous people and rich
people, you think they'd be the least. Now
a lot of times they're the most insecure
because they're always trying to live up to
something. And I I just think it's funny.
I sense that in this where it's like,
you know, oh, like, that felt like an
attack. No. No. No. You're you're very smart.
I agree with you. To be to be,
fair, with all due respect, one doesn't have
to
be brilliant to attempt a coup. I disagree
with that. As somebody who has helped plan
coup d'etat
not here, but, you know, other places,
it takes a lot of work, and that's
not what he did. When we were talking
about what is capable or what you need
to do to be able to plan a
coup, And you you cited your expertise having
planned coups. I'm not gonna get into the
specifics, but, Oh, he he loves it, doesn't
he? Now first of all, ask him what
he means right there. So coups but not
in this country?
So does he mean that we haven't coud
this government?
That's an interesting statement when you think about
it. Or is he saying that I haven't
done it as a part of the US
government?
Either way, my god. He's admitting to being
a criminal, guys. He's openly admitting to be
a part of either
going to other countries and helping them coup
other governments around the world, or weirdly I
would like not this government, which might even
suggest that that is the case, or that
he just I mean, think about all the
weird overlaps there.
These people are criminals. They're organized criminals. It's
what it is.
Successful coups? Well, I wrote about Venezuela in,
in the book, and,
it it turned out not to be successful.
Not that we had all that much to
do with it, but I saw what it
took for an opposition to try and overturn
an illegally elected president.
Yeah. No. Not that way. You know? It's
just pathetic.
It's just sad. It's very sad. And the
bottom line is this should matter to you
right now. Watching what they've done,
knowing that this is what they're capable, knowing
they've tried many times, and yet we're not
supposed to pretend this is obviously what's happening
again and right in front of us. Now
the sanctions they both talk about,
you know, what which will drive the people,
which will hurt their economy, which will all
the things they later turn around and go,
see? That's why we know socialism doesn't work.
It's exactly what they admit to causing. How
dumb is that?
And the point though is to realize the
sanctions as I've told you for years.
You you go back to look at US
documents before they were very publicly identified, like
before the Internet. They used to write this
stuff down.
The whole point of sanctions like, look at
like, Kissinger level stuff.
The point was to direct these sanctions
to hurt the people. You wanna starve the
people. I mean, there's even that famous clip
from,
Giuliani
saying that this is what makes a great
regime, speaking to the MEK maniacs in Iran,
or rather outside of Iran, but they're gonna
they wanna put them in power. This is
a cult, a terrorist organization.
And he's speaking to them saying, we we
have the Iranian coup. It's coming. He's getting
paid for it. And he simply says that,
you know, we have people selling their organs
for food. He goes, this is what makes
a good revolution. Literally says that. I don't
think he thought he would be seen.
Because they're driving people to starvation, and the
whole way it's supposed to work is that
people they know you're doing it. They know
the US government's starving them. But when you
get to a point where you're watching your
children die in front of you, you don't
care what stops it. You're going, whatever. I
don't care. Then let the US take power.
I don't wanna die. I want my children
to have food.
And so they swing in like the savior.
But that's not usually how it works anymore.
But the point is, that's what they believe
they can accomplish by hurting people to the
maximum.
And then just sweeping up afterward.
I mean, even if that ends up being
everything. Right? So Al MacLeod shows you what
the New York Times disgustingly posted on the
2 on 2,019.
Venezuela kids are dying. Are we responsible?
Our well meaning sanctions may be inflicting pain
on the wrong people.
Like, you guys I mean, you gotta really
laugh at how stupid this is.
These are supposedly the highest level journalists.
And you're gonna tell me that you can't
piece together what I literally just told you
that is easy to look up, that you
can that I mean,
you point out one example of historical fort
financial sanctions against the country they're at war
with or about to be, and you show
me where it doesn't amount to the people
being hurt. And then tell me why this
mainstream journalist couldn't work that out.
No. This is propaganda. That's what their actual
job is. Well meaning sanctions? How disgusting.
Sanctions designed just the way that they're supposed
to be, to hurt people.
But you're doing the job you're supposed to
in gaslighting for that genocide. Or excuse me,
for that.
Financial terrorism.
So Rania Kelleck highlights this around the opposition
side. She goes, let's be clear about what
side you're on if you oppose Venezuela's elected
current elected government.
Israel's side, she says. She said, I'm getting
angry message responses to my Venezuela reports,
reporting from people who purport to be pro
Palestine,
yet repeat lies about Venezuela promoted by the
same media justifying genocide on Gaza.
And as many have pointed out, some of
the largest
blind supporters of kind of what Elon is
pushing are aggressively pro Israel.
But she goes on to say, Venezuelan opposition
leader, Maria Corina Machado, who is currently behind
a violent coup attempt, loves Israel. She wrote
a letter to him asking for regime change
as I already showed you.
Here is Venezuela's US backed opposition leader, Machado,
promising to reestablish the Venezuelan embassy in occupied
Jerusalem. You know, a crime, but no big
deal. In 2020,
she signed a cooperation agreement with Israel's Netanyahu
Likud party, you know, the most genocidally may
maniacal entity in the in the entire maniacal
government,
unquote, political, ideological, and social issues, as well
as advancing on issues related to strategy, geopolitics,
and security. You know, the government committed genocide
right now, who's probably killed 50 children while
we've been talking so
far. And she wants to she wants to
align their ideologies.
Read Zionism, ladies and gentlemen. This should matter
to you if you've been paying attention to
any of what's going on. Here is Venezuelan's
leader, opposition leader Machado,
thanking Israel for recognizing than attempting to,
the than attempted
coup leader Guaido.
So just realize, she is going, yes. Thank
you for endorsing the guy that nobody actually
believed was in charge, that was blind and
supported by the US government. You're seeing the
pieces together. You shouldn't need to. She is
a very clearly CIA backed entity.
And then she she goes, meanwhile, Maduro loves
Palestine,
which you've seen him say many times. Maduro
supports Palestine. His opponents love Israel.
McLeod points out the same. For those unsure
which side to support,
president Maduro cast his ballot yesterday and shouted,
I saw it on video. La long live
free Palestine.
Machado
said that, quote, our struggle is Israel's struggle.
That seems like a pretty easy breakdown right
now based on a pretty large event. But
I'll let you decide what you care about.
Again, Rubinstein in the letter
of Machado
reaching out to Netanyahu saying, please regime change
this government for me. Like, that's not supposed
to be a problem.
Now we I'll include some of the recent
articles we did talking about
Venezuela, the right makes regime change great again.
This one just talks about the
and we we talk about Venezuela in this
conversation but we also talk about we're gonna
get into in a minute if we have
time about the, Sid Thiamen
gang rape conversation.
But I wanna show you a couple more
posts about this. So so this is, Amazon
Piss Jugs, great name, saying this is absolutely
disgusting. There is, quote, 0 evidence. The US
wants Venezuela's oil and will do anything to
get it.
Excuse me. I I read that in a
too fast of a point. The first sentence
is this is absolutely disgusting. There's zero evidence,
period.
The US wants Venezuela's oil, and they'll do
anything to get it. The point is he's
highlighting,
The Guardian
saying that overwhelming evidence that Maduro is beaded.
Be beaded.
Defeated is what I meant to say. And
the point is it's quoted.
You know why?
Because just like you see everywhere else, you've
got the guardian taking a quote from
an opposition leader
saying there's overwhelming evidence, and all they do
is quote that. When you read the article,
you'll quite quickly find out that it's subjective,
false, and unverified
evidence.
But, of course, the the title, US recognizes
Emundo Gonzales as winner.
The point is Machado and Gonzales. I briefly
pointed this out the other day. It's kinda
like they're they're like the
one thing basically. They're they're it's all part
of the same agenda.
The US has already stood up and said
this. Doesn't that seem a little bit odd?
Well, it should, seeing as how just like
last time, they're challenging what the rest of
the world seems to be saying.
And here's Elon Musk.
Same point. US declares he's the winner and
he says, good.
Good.
Because we're totally not pushing into the legitimate
government for the interest of our CIA backed
entity and pretending we're fighting them. Right?
BRICS news, which is not, you know, been
wrong about a lot of stuff recently. And
this is an account that's not even associated
with bricks. It's it's kinda manipulative.
Saying United States officially declares him the winner.
Given the overwhelming evidence, it says, it's clear
to the United States, this is from the
United States, and most importantly to the Venezuelan
people, which is clearly not what they actually
think, that Gonzales won the most most votes.
Based on what? Because Blinken said so? Don't
forget, the right and the left are all
lined up fighting for the same person.
Doesn't that seem strange?
Don't let's not forget this guy. Okay? Juan
Guaido.
They said the same thing about Guido, ladies
and gentlemen, and it was definitively proven that
this guy was a complete fraud.
Got caught lying, got called got caught doing
exactly what they tried to blame on Maduro.
And we're just gonna sleepwalk into this yet
again? I'm speaking to the Republicans out there.
If you care about the truth and you're
still buying this, wake up. You're being played.
Another article. This is from 2019. Flagrant US
v v Venezuela regime change.
Donald Trump's time frame.
Here's Abby Martin's video. This goes back. She's
been covering this for a long time. She
was in Venezuela. She has something to tell
you about the opposition, which is the same
entity, guys. We're talking about the same manipulative.
This is been this has been going on
for a long time.
I recommend you follow Abi Martin and people
like this that have been following it long
before, and it for most have. This goes
back to Chavez and before. It goes all
the way through, and it's the same agenda.
Here's what she had to say about the
people that the US government was backing, just
like the ones they're backing now.
I was to see that the reality of
these numbers is so warped. I was completely
unprepared for what would happen to me for
simply reporting these facts.
Because I questioned the validity of the fatality
count being a 100% due to state forces,
prominent opposition spokespeople created a false hysteria over
an outrageous lie that myself and Empire Files
producer Mike Preisner were not journalists, but in
fact working directly for the government intelligence forces.
Now the point here is that they were
claiming that she that basically, that she was
covering the false narrative that Maduro had shot
a bunch of protesters. And we already saw
that's already got they're pushing that yet again.
They got immediately broken down as fake, old
video. But they're going, here he is, shooting
protesters. It's the same old tired US government
agenda.
They lied about it in Syria. They lied
about it in in everywhere. Venezuela,
last time, they lied about it in in
I believe it was
a blank, and I'm forgetting when all of
a sudden.
Any case, we've shown you so many of
the oh, and Ukraine. Same thing. Maidan Square,
guys. They did this themselves. There's that video
I've played you many times where the Estonian
prime minister is talking to Kathy Ashton saying,
we know
that the people who shot at the protesters
were on the side of you guys. He
well, he just says the the
the side they're supporting. Or the point is
that that's them. We know that. She goes,
yeah. Yeah.
And yet, the narrative to this very day
from US government talking points is that that
was the other side and that the regime
they put in place was saving Ukraine. You
know, all the neo nazis they put
there. It's the same thing everywhere they do
this. It's the same thing here. They pretend
that he did this to make just try
to manipulate the entire process. And it worked
a lot more back then than it is
now, but they're doing the same thing
today. And that we weren't actually conducting interviews
of protesters, but taking their pictures to turn
into police forces.
And not only that, but the police had
then arrested protesters
based on our intelligence.
The life threatening lie was first promoted by
professor at Venezuela's Simone Bolivar University and opposition
activist Jose Vicente Carrasquero.
The rumors were echoed and exaggerated by several
prominent opposition journalists like Manuel Malivar,
Miami reporter Angie Perez.
The disinformation campaign incited a virtual lynch mob
against us for days,
which translated into real life stalking and threats,
calls to find and kill us, doxing of
personal information and more.
Revealing their characters, scores of opposition Twitter accounts
specifically use the word lynch
when calling for violence against us.
More than that, this opposition hate campaign also
posted the address of an event Mike was
speaking at, inciting people to come confront us
and worse.
Dozens of Venezuelan expats actually showed up, chanting
against socialism, and tried to physically force their
way into the event to disrupt it. But
the threats of violence were not empty. Just
days later, a Telesor journalist was actually shot
in the back by opposition protesters when her
and her team were viciously attacked with Molotov
cocktails, bullets, and explosives.
Many other journalists have also been called infiltrators
and attacked, like when a Global Vision crew
was doused with gasoline by protesters at a
recent demonstration and told to leave where they
would get burned. Sound familiar?
Same things we're seeing all over the place.
Ukraine especially. Amazingly, international human rights organizations like
Human Rights Watch and the Committee to Protect
Journalists have been silent on the attacks on
journalists from the opposition and have only condemned
the government for press repression.
For as much as Venezuela's poor is used
as the basis of the international media campaign
to oust the government,
The poor people from the barrios of Venezuela
are not the ones protesting.
We're being lied to.
Just like them, guys, it's the same thing.
It is the same thing.
Well, that's frustrating.
Well, let me know. Let me if you
let me know. Is there is the stream
struggling at all?
Looks like it is. I don't know what's
going on with my anyway. So here, Fiorello
adds to this,
and she got an she got this on
the first, but as she said and this
is something this is sort of unconfirmed, but
this is ultimately what's he happening. What she
was saying that she got a draft resolution
sent to her by her sources that's seeking
cosponsors in the US congress
that explicitly rejects Maduro, which we already see
happening, and names Gonzales as
the president-elect of Venezuela,
calling for the, quote, imposition of new sanctions.
Now, again, I I find it almost impossible
that's not gonna happen.
And just just to be clear, we already
talked about it.
Put out a statement that they tried to
make it look like she was pro the
other side, but all she really said was
we stand with this with Venezuelan people.
And we already see what Blinken and the
rest of them are saying. So it's been
they they are their administration. And it's very
clear. Even Biden put something out suggesting that,
you know, questioning the outcome.
So it's an interesting reason. If I it's
I find it almost very telling that she
would tweet it that way as if they're
trying to play into it. Which speaks to
what I actually think. That it's 1 big
2 party illusion and we're all being played.
So recognize this wouldn't surprise me. The sanctions
will be coming in one way or another.
Pray it might even be sometime after the
election. Right? Because I think all of them
are trying to get the perception just the
way they want it.
At the end of the day, it's nothing
new.
Manalo,
De Los Santos points out something very important.
Now this is from yesterday toward the end,
or beginning of the day in
regard to how they responded to this. So
what we've got so far is a bunch
of pushback from people claiming they've lied, they
cheated.
Almost all of it based on flimsy, unverifiable
things, like almost always, and almost all the
convincing seeming pieces have been presumed to be
old videos, false images, like every other time.
So the point is we're left in a
position now where
it's kind of left up in the air.
Right? But here is what Maduro did, which
I think is calling their bluff, which speaks
very loudly. He says, president Maduro has outplayed
the right opposition by appealing to the Supreme
Court
to fully audit the election and confirm results.
Think about that. Is that what you usually
get from a dictator who just stole the
election?
Probably not. Certainly could be another game, but
seems interesting. And he says, we will be
releasing all the tally sheets.
He will be releasing all the tally sheets.
The the right is now expected to also
submit theirs, which I argue won't happen.
But it says part of the challenge has
been that even though the election authority affirm
Maduro's victory
and has 30 days to publish the full
results, it has faced major delays this week
due to hacking attempts, and it stands by
the right on voting stations and their regional
offices. Which, of course, doesn't get covered by
all the right Elon supporting push on Twitter,
all the fake videos showing them with polling
stations. Now that it's after the fact, why
aren't you showing their ability their efforts to
slow down his process? Which then they'll turn
around and say, see, he's trying to hide
the outcome. That's what they're doing. Trying to
hack, trying to attack these polling stations, which
they've already shown you.
30 days to publish the full results.
They're already claiming, like, he's withholding it even
though he's still within his time frame. The
point on top of it is they're trying
to make it look like he's holding back.
I think we need to wait for this
other outcome. Let them both fully reproduce their
information. Let it all be shown publicly.
I guarantee you, the right won't want that.
Now, this is I don't think this should
be taken as the same left right mindset
as this country.
There's obvious similarities.
But just the opposition at this point is
what I'm talking about. And it says Maduro's
move to request an audit of the election
by the it's the TSJ or that is
the, Supreme Court.
By the Supreme Court, will make the results
even more transparent. Here's what he said. Quote,
I am asking the court to rule on
the attack against the electoral process and the
attempted coup. Let the court clarify everything that
needs to be clarified.
And isn't there isn't there argument that all
these things are are against Maduro and he's
forcing it in? You know, it just seems
like the military and the judicial system, the
people, all weirdly support him. Sounds like the
opposite to me. All 10 candidates, including Maduro,
will now have to present their records for
CLAR for certification,
effectively challenging the right the the opposition candidate,
Gonzales, who claims to have tallies but has
failed to present them to the CNN. The
c n e, which is the
election authority.
It says the opposition's plan to violently overthrow
the government has failed.
At this point, Washington refuses to recognize any
election result that counters their plans to impose
a puppet government, which they've done many times.
You just heard them admit to doing so,
which would hand over political and economic control
of Venezuela and its natural resources.
And is incapable of affecting any change on
the ground,
Washington has resorted to a massive media offensive
to discredit the election with the aid of
Elon Musk and New York Times who fill
the web with fake videos of government oppression.
It's, like, every single time. It's amazing this
even has any effect anymore
And claims of the far right tallies from
unverified sources. The media offensive will now provide
cover for the opposition failure to submit voter
tallies. That's exactly what I think. This is
what this is projecting for the future.
By claiming that the Supreme Court is just
another of Maduro's tools, which certainly could be
the case, But the idea is that then
present itself present it somewhere else. Present it
publicly somewhere where all can be looked simultaneously.
They won't do that as the point. It'll
it'll the the accusation
the accusation that they that system is controlled
by him will then be offered for by
with one that they control. And I'll argue
that that's probably not something Maduro controls. Certainly
could be, and we should ask, but evidence
matters. Their point would be that when they
present something, it's almost always a group that
we can prove is completely co opted by
the US
system.
Like the OAS. Like every other thing we've
talked about here.
He says, in fact, the judges
of the Supreme Court are not chosen by
Maduro, but nominated and elected to 12 year
terms by the National Assembly. A
legislative legislative body, which also includes representatives of
the opposition.
It's pretty simple, isn't it? So and also
remember the National Assembly, I mean, the whole
overlap with Guaido. Like, Like, if you actually
understand the situation,
their very narratives from before prove that what
he's trying to do would be the way
to go.
He says the tables have been turned and
now it's up to the right opposition to
prove to the Venezuelan people whether they actually
believe in democrat democracy or just want to
see the country fully destroyed by US sanctions
intervention.
My point is that let's wait and see
what happens in regard to what's presented. But
I promise you this will get mired in
all sorts of other fake news and lies
and and
calls for immediate removal from power from people
like Lindsey
Graham, which is what always happens. And that
overshadows any legitimacy of the claim. Like with
Bolivia,
They they they bull rush that in they
forced it in. They use the OES lies
to claim that was a stealing of democracy
put in a military junta of which I
believe the person in charge went to prison.
The point is that that they it slowly
got pulled back by the people, but they
still got what they wanted from it.
This is how this always works.
And what what's the outcome? The suffering of
the people.
Alan McLeod, end this segment by saying the
tide is turning. This is from today. The
governments of Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico have released
a statement, most of which are US allies,
by the way. Well, all of, really, but,
you know, it's some of them were kinda
on the line like Mexico. But it's it's
anyway, that's not even accurate. The point is
that, like, different elements are shown to be
I I think that that's a a challenging
one out of all of them, but they're
all allies.
Release a statement calling for Venezuelan sovereignty to
be respected
and for the opposition to stop their violence.
That's interesting from US allies.
Meaning they're calling out what they're doing. Not
Maduro, but the opposition and the violence they're
spreading in the streets, attacking polling stations, what
they won't show you. This is after the
fact, mind you. So it says, today, Mexican
leader Claudia
Schonbaum condemned the OAS for its intervention in
Venezuela.
See?
The o n is the the Organization of
American States.
It's a comp it's the one that lied
about Bolivia last time, and then screamed about
democracy, and then completely stopped talking about it
when a military junta was put in place.
Or excuse me, yanta or yanta, whatever. I
know. I I'm always makes fun of me
when I say that. A yanta just seems
like a very strange word to say. Anyway,
military power.
Now, let's get into the
next segment. Let me put this other window
back up. I did that almost so this
window wouldn't be as large, but I still
think it's, a lot to get into. I'm
probably gonna skip some stuff. But overall, guys,
I think the Venezuelan example is an important
one. I think it shows you exactly what
we're dealing with here and how powerful it
is
through
the control paradigm.
Like, still completely lockstep blind support.
My argument is that the liberal conservative, you
know, people that aren't completely lost in it,
I I think they're not I think they're
seeing it.
I really genuinely think people are starting to
see through it. And I think this is
where we have an opportunity to present them
with the fact that there is another re
you know,
dynamic over here of people that only care
about the truth. That ex you know, acting
in with integrity and compassion and don't consider
political sides when coming to a conclusion about
what's going on.
And that that I don't know why anybody
honest wouldn't see that as the re what
we all should strive for. Be a conservative
and whatever be whatever you believe you are
and fight for those ideas the beliefs and
the things that you think you should believe
in. Fight for them. Fight to uphold them.
Fight to initiate them.
But don't allow that to influence you to
lie about what these things are or what's
really going on, or to blindly
act in subservience and acquiesce to your government
that clearly doesn't care about you because the
leaders of that side tell you to. You
know, it's just I I get it. Even
saying it out loud, I'm like, how does
anybody fall for this stuff? But people are
seeing it. I believe that.
So let's get this next segment in regard
to Iran going, and I think this one's
important,
as all of them really are.
Now Now this has to do with the
conversation. Now I I I was I was
gonna say, I just remember, I wanna start
with this a little bit backwards, really.
Normally, I would start with the thing that
caused this conversation, which by the way, I
think you probably already seen, which is the
assassination
of a Hamas leader and an assassination of
people in Lebanon, Hezbollah,
entities as well as another person tied to
Iran, at least the claim anyway.
All of these are complete
extrajudicial assassinations
that violate international law, vi violate their airspace,
didn't go through the UN. I mean, these
are all completely illegal. Doesn't matter how bad
you think these people are. That's the reality.
And just because the US government doesn't, we
and people in this country cheer, doesn't mean
it's not illegal.
That's the whole rampant lawlessness kind of dynamic,
which has only caused people to act like
might is right. Well, we're strong. We can
do what we want. You don't think that
folds into people's lives?
So we're gonna start with the conversation about
what they're driving
through that. And the hype about Iran and
the idea of world war 3 and the
same kind of same fear mongering fear porn
kind of idea. And then then we'll talk
about the actions that lead to this. Okay?
So I just want you to be clear
on the on the way we're gonna go
about it. Now this is from RNC Research.
Attorney general Merrick Garland,
we believe that the Iranians are attempting to
kill or injure Trump. So it is
we believe based on what?
Of course, we can't get into that. Right?
They also floated that before the assassination attempt
conversation. Right? So they the threat was around
based on nothing.
And if you if I mean, let's be
clear about this, guys. The Iranian government has
already been
I mean, for a very long time, shown
the amount of restraint that you wish you
saw from our governments. That's not good or
it's not good guy, bad guy. It's just
basic reality that they have withheld action in
times when everybody else would have reacted.
Because they thought that it would at least
in my opinion, they thought that it would,
then, to Robert's opinion, would lead to more
chaos for their people and the world.
So my point is, I don't understand why
anybody
would think it makes sense for this to
happen this way. Or that they would come
out and then clumsily hire some kid to
miss his ear. Like, it's just it's such
a stupid dynamic.
To me, this is obvious, and consider all
of it. But to me, my opinion, it's
obvious this is them trying to just use
this, like with everything else, to just lazily
dump around over the top. Because Israel needs
that and there's clearly agendas there that go
back a long way. But I was This
is just what he said. I'll play it
for you. When telling us more about the
Iranian threat against mister Trump and other former
US officials. Our intelligence community has made clear
that we believe that the Iranians are attempting
to kill,
or, injure,
former,
high government officials. This is an ongoing issue.
We have ongoing investigations.
You don't think we've seen the end? I
don't think we've seen the end of the
planning. No.
Journalism, guys. You don't think you've seen the
end?
That's your question? What a bunch of idiots.
The bottom line here, guys,
what's the substance here?
Iran is gonna do thing, you know, it's
based on nothing. It's oh, look. Let's be
clear. They have every reason to do it.
Every reason. These people have assassinated
any number of people that they believe in,
support. Not terrorists,
scientists. Israel's killed any number of scientists because
they claim some that they're gonna make a
bomb even though now the US government admitted
that's not the truth. Even the US government,
but also the International Atomic Energy Agency repeatedly
over and over.
And every time Netanyahu talks, he's in bated
breath. They're 1 minute away from a bomb.
No. No. They're not. And they're lying and
you've been lying about that for a very
long time and driven the US government in
the wars. It took US lives many times
based on these lies.
My point, though, is that they've with Israel,
but also the US government, Donald Trump, Soleimani,
They have any number of and based on
Israel's statements, that's legal.
Isn't that called self defense?
Doesn't matter if it's 9 months later. Right?
Self defense according to Israel.
But, no, they're not doing that.
This to me is about manufacturing the justification
to do what Israel wants. And we'll get
to that next about the deployment conversation of
the US government, which is 2, 3, 4
tabs away.
Telling you that we're gonna deploy troops to
Israel.
So much for the ceasefire talks they clearly
wanted. Right?
Here's b x calling out Pierce Stew Peters.
Simply showing you well, she said, I love
the statement just in general. Quit doom scrolling
and go touch some graphs today.
Right? Get out of there. Stop looking at
your screens. The world's beautiful.
Right? And if you never had these TV
screens, phones, anything else, 9 times out of
10, you wouldn't eat you you wouldn't even
recognize there was a problem. They probably 99
times out of a 100.
Because usually there's not. Not to say there's
not war and torture and murder. The point
is in your world,
You you're living in the, you know I
mean, who knows where you are? My point
is that you go outside and you don't
see all this. Like we said with COVID
19 illusion.
If you hadn't had these things in front
of you, you would have never had any
idea what's even happening. Probably because it wasn't.
But here
is what Stu Peters is posting. And this
goes over, like, a year or so.
But take a look at this. And, guys,
this guy these these these people were like,
talking about The People's Voice or Matt Wallace
or Ian Lumer. These people are clowns. They're
constantly putting out false and unverified information. They're
constantly hyping things based on things they want
you to think. This is not journalism. This
is propaganda. This is
reality TV.
He says, Egypt is Egypt is preparing for
war. This is World War 3
After October 7th, October 24th. Well, is Egypt?
No. Not not far as I can tell.
But it was he made a lot of
got a lot of intention for hyping that.
Right? Because everybody you know, people that are
kinda stuck in that doom porn loop, they
they're always upbeat. Oh my god. Here it
goes. It's gonna go. It's gonna happen today.
2023 November, breaking. US military just carried out
multiple air strikes against Iran proxies. Welcome to
World War 3.
Every time.
April 28, 2023. World war 3 is looming
and folks are dying suddenly. Oh, we gotta
we gotta plug his fake documentary that used
a lot of misinformation
that even the doctors included in the documentary
later called out as they were misrepresented for
what they said using images of things that
turned out not be what they said they
were or old video over and on and
on. Don't forget, that died suddenly documentary with
even quotes around it in the title
perfectly hid all of the results in in
search engine search results
when you were searched for that. Don't forget.
When you put a search in Google or
anything else in
quotes, what it does is it's it's a
specific search. It searches for specifically those words
wherever they show up. Right?
And before they put this out, if you
did that search, that's where this came from,
it was amazing. You got to it was
just like
thousands and thousands of search of of articles
died suddenly. This my this my son or
this person, the football player, they died suddenly.
Then, after the documentary came out, all you
got was the documentary.
Which by the way, is full of misinformation.
But also some true things too.
My point is, I'm not arguing that people
aren't dying suddenly if you know my work,
obviously. And it obviously, blood clots and heart
attack, everything. So it's real.
Because of the injection. It's been proven. My
point is, with this kind of stuff, it
was designed, in my opinion, or wherever he
was used,
to hide the larger truth behind something that
could be dismissed because it was riddled with
misinformation.
Again, as even some of the doctors involved
later made clear, I was taken out of
context right there.
Crazy.
Here we go. March 16th. Here we go.
Want World War 3 so bad?
January. Evidence emerges. NATO's gearing up for a
full scale war against Russia. World War 3?
Come on, guys. We have to see through
this stuff.
Now look, I'm I'll be the first to
tell you that I'm worried about where this
goes. But my point is,
day after day after day after day, World
War 3, World War 3, World War 3.
That's ridiculous.
That's
hype. Even if it is possible, it's still
hype for clicks.
COVID unleashed on the world before the election.
24. World War 3 starts before the election.
Some point?
World War 3. World War 3. World's like
Monday on the Stu Peter show, our out
of talks Israel, world war three eminent.
Iran attacks Israel?
It's just
usually within these things this is the point.
The idea of what usually they're sharing is
about
half of what the corporate media narrative is,
usually. And they kind of muddled with things
that might be true. And usually in an
agenda that is beneficial to the very thing
we're trying to stop.
It's everywhere.
The Syrian girl points this out about the,
visit of Netanyahu.
Sequence of events.
First, the spectator index pointed this out on
the 20 set on 24th July. Now this
is very important, mind you,
for the
the point that the Israeli media was already
stating something that was you know, it just
shows you who's actually driving the bus, I
would say. So it says, breaking Israel's channel
14 reports, Netanyahu has received approval
from the US for an operation against Hezbollah.
So he states at least that he's got
approval, whether that's even the truth.
Usually it is.
Usually something he didn't even want that US
was like, don't tell anybody. And he does
it anyway because he doesn't care. And he
wants to make us look bad, but also
make himself look good.
And then what's he do?
He goes out and attacks he has one,
murders people in Lebanon. Kills civilians. I'll show
you. It's a terrible picture.
So the US gives him approval to do
this, then he goes out and does it.
Now the US is saying we're gonna deploy
troops.
Who's that? Who's in charge here? Who's that?
What are Americans being put to task to
fight for Israel's aggressive war of aggression?
It seems that way.
She says, secret of events. Netanyahu gives speech
to congress. Met Biden, and then got green
light to attack Lebanon.
He then slaughtered 12 Syrian children in the
Golanites, which is what happened, and made the
world call them Israeli to use it as
a cause of spell. So he he it
could I mean, you could argue that it
was the Iron Dome misfiring.
Either way, they blamed it on Lebanon when
it was them. I showed you the video
of the iron dome firing on the air,
arcing back down, exploding and hitting that field.
Like, undeniable.
They did that. And it was Syrian Druze
population. And they called them Israeli, and tried
to pretend that they cared about them. They
kicked them out. They didn't want them there.
I'll show you next.
He then bombed a residential building in Beirut,
killing lots of civilians. He assassinated the prime
minister of Gaza inside of Iran.
Biden Harris gave him the green light to
do all of this.
Now here is the antiwar.com
from the 31st July.
Lloyd Austin pledges the US will defend Israel
if it faces attacks. So you see how
this works?
You give them the green light, you then
publicly put it out there that look, we
got your back. If you do if you
go start wars,
Does it do this is what Americans believe?
These people are not working for American interests.
It says the Israeli drone strike a Beirut
assassination of Hamas leader in Iran risks a
major regional war. Secretary of defense Lloyd Austin
on Wednesday said the US would defend Israel
if it faces attacks in response to these
strikes.
So you're just you're just state the point
is you're completely backing the entity that just
broke the law.
And isn't isn't it wouldn't well, I'll I'll
hold off on that point because I think
it's good to do it in time, but
about the self defense point.
Here's what the the White House put out
on the first, yesterday.
President Biden spoke today with Netanyahu of Israel.
The president reaffirmed his commitment to Israel's security.
Again, against everything.
Every most everyone in the party that he's
a part of does not want this, and
yet he is locked in. Ask yourself how
that makes sense.
You think this helps his election if you
believe your votes translate?
No. I mean, for crying out loud. So
he's either being threatened, he's either a Zionist
against everything else, or, you know, blackmailed, pressured.
I don't know. But that there's just no
way for a politician, for a for a
member of the government, for anything. For a
person in an election that this would make
sense.
He says,
his commitment to their security against all threats
from Iran,
and then lists off things that aren't Iran.
Hamas, which Israel funds, Hezbollah, which is part
of Lebanese group.
And the Houthis, who are Yemeni group. All
Both of which are supported by the majority
by the popular
both Yemen and and Lebanon, I'm talking about.
Those are groups that are broadly supported by
the people.
But they don't like them because they push
back into Israel, therefore terrorism.
You know, not the genocide we're committing, not
the countless acts of violent aggression over the
years. Not though that's not dead. That's all
you're racist if you point it out. No.
No. No. This when they're defending for or
against those things, that's terrorism.
It just kinda blows me away that we're
even con continuing to have to point these
things out.
It's because of the paradigm.
Then it goes on to say, the president
discussed efforts to support Israel's defense against threats.
Now we're not getting into the fact that
he they keep bombing these groups. Right? We're
defending. Right? Including against ballistic missiles and drones
to include
new defensive
US military
deployments.
That's troops, guys. That's troops.
That's what they're talking about.
So ask yourself if anybody around you, anywhere,
whether supporting Israel or not, is in it
wants to be deployed to fight Israel's war
against allies that are entities it's bombing illegally
while committing a genocide,
I bet you you'd find very few people,
even people that support Israel, that would want
to support that.
And also and let's realize, whether or not
you think that's even what's gonna happen, it's
already happening.
As we've been showing you, there's been US
boots to the ground, UK boots to the
ground long before October 7th, but very clearly
right then and afterward.
Eunice Trawi, Israeli soldiers from Germany, US, UK,
Ethiopia,
Ukraine, fighting in Gaza. There are other countries
too.
Many of them, by the way, wearing weird
Israel prophetic, like, great or, like, greater Israel
patches or, like, the third temple, or
very disgusting things that have to do with
overlapping of the Azov movement or I I
mean, it's it's crazy how this all intertwines.
But ask yourself what this shows you.
If it's very clear, which I think it's
undeniably clear, that the majority of the world
is calling this out, and I'm not even
just talking about UN groups or human rights
groups or everybody with any standing in any
form of international law. I'm talking about the
peoples of countries. I'm talking about, in many
cases, the countries themselves.
It's clearly the majority of the world.
But then you've got these countries like the
US, like the UK, like Ukraine.
Well, I can't speak to Ukrainian people. It's
hard to tell what that means right now.
But
to these countries, you can prove that the
majority of the population do not support what's
happening.
And yet, they're they're on the ground.
So what I want you to really see
here in a larger sense is this is
the demons this is
demonstrating
the power structures versus the people
all around the world. That's what most of
this continues to show me, That we're watching
a very rapid change in power
of just the peoples of these countries and
the power structures that have always had you
under their thumb. And suddenly, for whatever any
number of reasons, largely because of Israel's del
belligerent genocide, that it's starting to kind of
become unraveled.
That's why you've got Pirkinofaso going, screw that.
We're gonna keep our stuff now.
It's changing, guys. And we need to lean
into this.
Because if you if you don't, they're gonna
continue doing this. They're gonna continue fighting their
genocidal wars around the world, and make you
responsible for it.
Now, Marav, Zonstein from 972 Magazine
points out the obvious. I said this before.
All of a sudden, the need for a
ceasefire in Gaza's disappeared.
That's the statement from the White House. How
in the world do you pretend that you're
fighting for a ceasefire and then deploy troops?
Again, which were already there. It's all about
the illusion, but it just shows you that
they never even wanted this. Same with the
pier, same with all of it, which shouldn't
be that hard to sell you on. Now
the war monitor reports that Biden warned Netanyahu
that if he escalates again, he shouldn't count
on US to bail him out, according to
Axios.
I don't believe that.
Because the point is, you're literally stating you're
deploying people on the ground, and then you
put out this public statement like, you better
not.
You better not or we won't. I don't
buy that. That's ridiculous and childish. But it's
what he said. My point is this is
about trying to play the game. I think
he's almost trying to take a a page
out of Trump's book right there. You know,
by just kinda playing it both ways and
hoping who you buy what you want. Bottom
line is, it's obvious this is not the
reality.
Now here is what Blinken said. And this
just goes to show you how much they
know you see right through them.
As Saul points out, we need to stop
we need to put a stop to the
killing, says the arms supplier who refuses to
stop supplying arms and enabling the killing.
Nobody believes you, Blinken.
Don't you just fake show of altruism? You're
clearly the one continuing the war. You can't
act like you want it to stop.
End of the conflict,
in
in Gaza,
to produce calm in the north between
Israel and Lebanon.
And then
to work on broader, more enduring peace and
security, but it all starts with the ceasefire.
Oh, I see. You know, the ceasefire that
they literally just
destroyed, or by the way, provably never even
wanted,
but destroyed by openly deploying troops to help
defend Israel.
That makes sense.
God, what what a bunch of disgusting hypocrites.
Here, wait just wait till we show you
some of these just ridiculous Patel clips.
I mean, my god.
Now here, Abir points this out. I thought
there was I wanna include this somewhere.
This now what this really is meant to
show you based on what we just showed
you is that the American
the governments involved don't care. They're pretending
to be what you want them to be.
For example, pretending to sanction people that were
murdering children. Right? Or the settler groups, but
then not really doing it. Or in this
case, this guy here,
as she puts it, this baby killer, was
put under American sanctions
for
organizing the attacks on the humanitarian convoys.
Right? So to go into so far as
to acknowledge it was happening and try to
sanction him,
but guess what? Now he's equipped with American
new weapons in Gaza
and a sniper.
See? Because they clearly care. Right? Fake sanctions.
But later, let's arm you to the teeth
because you're doing bad things.
She says, you know what that means? More
dead children in Gaza.
This says, remember Slo Mo Street of Meso
9 who was subject to American sanctions and
was dismissed from the reserves
due to his activity of blocking the trucks?
He rejoined in the unit and is a
sniper in the Gaza Strip.
Right. That's the point. So that that we
we don't care that he's a criminal or
that he's trying to starve children. Give him
a gun.
Good times. Here is inside a paper.
Brought the Biden administration is convinced Iran is
going to attack Israel
in retaliation for the assassination. Well well, according
to Israel, that's called self defense.
But here's the crazy part, and it says,
where was it? Oh, is it the wrong
one? Hold on.
Oh, I guess there's one more of these.
Sorry. I will hold off. But there's a
point that I'll make in a minute. I'll
read this all the way. Biden administration is
convinced Iran is going to attack Israel in
retaliation for the assassination attempt or assassination of
the Hamas political leader in Tehran. It was
in Iran, by the way,
earlier this week and is preparing to carry
it out, a counter a counter. Excuse me.
So the point is weird. The point is
obviously.
Like, do you know what what Israel what
we've already seen what Israel and the United
States would do? They're doing it.
So this idea that somehow their response would
be terrorism
or unjust or illegal, it's just such a
flimsy
I mean, the only people that are gonna
buy it are people that already buy whatever
they sell no matter what.
It's
sad. But let's get into the conversation of
this happening.
So here is what Muhammad Shehadeh points out.
Assassinating,
Hanaya, I believe, or just the the Hamas
leader, is an empty victory image that reeks
of desperation and malleolence.
Malevolence. Excuse me. He was a politician, not
a militant leader.
Israeli media themselves admit his killing will have
minimal effect on Hamas operations.
But it'll dramatically impact internal power dynamics.
So it says he lived in the open
and not in hiding like sinwar. So re
so reaching his head is not an achievement.
Why kill him now? Ruin the ceasefire deal.
That's the main point because he is the
leader of their side of negotiations.
So this ploy about ceasefires that he points
out, what's a lie? You don't murder the
head of their negotiations while pretending you want
a cease fire.
Kills the chances of their Palestinian unity after
Beijing summit, push Hamas to become more hard
line. Like, literally, they're manufacturing
what they want from them.
He
was a pragmatist and had a mod a
moderating influence on Sinwar and Hamas' military wing.
Now, again, you have to rehear this in
the context that Hamas or any of these
groups are simply not the boogeymen they make
them out to be. In no way am
I supporting them or calling them the the
opposite of what they're saying. Let's not forget,
Israel funded them to be that entity. That's
why this is the reality.
It's changed over the years, but the point
is clear that they wanted them to play
that role.
My point overall is that even then, they
are not simply this boogeyman terrorist group they
try to make them out to be.
Either way, what he's talking about is that
they just killed the person that was in
fact the this is exactly what we're always
talking about. The one the the you aim
at the ones that are making him even
like, you take a group of them, and
the ones that are the most extreme are
the ones you work with. The ones that
are more moderate, you get out of the
way. That's the example of the entire conversation
of what they funded over the years. They
work with the worst of the worst
and get rid of attack
and call the terrorists the ones that are
more moderate. Because they're less willing to just
bend the knee to the United States,
so they can't work with them. But then
these guys over here who wanna take money,
do anything. So we'll call them the right
leaders and we'll let them do what they
want.
Fighting terrorism, we call that. Right?
So there's a few more. Here's the point
overall I wanna get to. I'm just running
the running long. Is that as Kim Iverson
points out, just so everyone is clear, Israel
killed the Palestinian ceasefire negotiator.
This is how serious Israel Israel is about
not making a deal that leads to a
stew 2 state solution and lasting peace.
Yona points this out. Hun, the Hamas leader
was not just a top Hamas leader. He
was the lead negotiator in the ceasefire talks.
The assassination is splitting
spitting in the face of diplomacy. Israel doesn't
want a ceasefire. They want to continue to
kill Palestinians.
And here's even I think it's The Guardian,
corporate media. He managed the high stakes negotiations
and diplomacy for Hamas, including
continuing indirect ceasefire talks. They all knew this,
guys. They all knew that. So they literally
targeted the guy who's more moderate in the
group and was the one leading negotiations.
Then they turn around and they gave praise
us for killing a terrorist, which by the
way, no matter what you think of him,
was all illegal in every sense of the
word. No matter what you think about it,
what they did was illegal.
Richard Meder says, remember this day when Israelis
claim the Arabs rejected diplomacy.
Israel's Israel Israelis killed the UN peace mediator,
count Bernadette,
in 1948.
Sound familiar? And now the Hamas leader, the
top negotiator, traveling on a diplomatic passport
to attend the president's inauguration in Iran, which
is where they killed him, inside of Iran.
So just like Soleimani,
while he was under the cover of diplomatic
mission, they murdered him in an Iraqi airport.
Now they've got the guy on a diplomatic
passport traveling into another country which they don't
have legal ability to act in,
and murdered him there while killing civilians around
wish he was around.
And this is supposed to be the the
action people praise?
I mean, it's just so shockingly dishonest, and
just everything we pretend we're fighting.
Let's not forget,
as Eva Heretz pointed out, recently,
Netanyahu
has systematically
foiled talks to release the very hostages he
claims he's fighting for.
Now he kills the lead negotiator. What do
you think is gonna happen now?
Here's what Ben Shapiro had to say, because
clearly he cares about these things. Right?
The last 24 hours, he puts out this
really stupid meme
with a guy increasingly getting excited apparently. Israel
kills Hezbollah number 2. Or Israel kills Hamas,
number 1. Israel kills head of IRGC Aerospace
Forces, which by the way, even he points
out down here. Oh, sorry. That wasn't even
confirmed. It could be a lie. Great journalism,
bud. Well, as long as it screams in
the side of Zionism, it doesn't matter. Right?
And here's and here's what Kim says. So
they can do targeted strikes, but instead choose
to carpet bomb Gaza? Wonder why?
Yeah. He won't engage that because he's ridiculous.
He doesn't care.
There's some other points down here I thought.
But anyway, the point is clear.
As long as you get what you want,
it doesn't matter. You know, the guy who
screams about being correct and right and accurate
and legal. Right? I guess only when it
applies to his interests.
And then he says, here's what Nora Erakat
says.
Now, again, just just think about it for
a second. Like,
these are still human beings.
Whatever
the dehumanized hype around them has been. There's
these are human beings.
And in in some cases, there are people
that will actively argue that you could Like
with Soleimani, guys. I'll be one of those
people in this case and prove to you
that Soleimani was not the person they said
he was.
It's actually very easy to prove. So the
point is that they went on this campaign
to make him out to be some terror
monster because Trump wanted to win.
And they broke every law imaginable to get
it done.
So my point is that that person had
family and friends and and people that revered
him. What do you think it does to
those people? It cements forever what this government
truly is. And quite frankly, I think that
should be obvious to the world by now.
My point is in this case, here's Ben
Shapiro making fun of her because she's talking
about this person in a different light. So
it just shows you the kind of lack
of humanity that people like Ben Shapiro have
when they choose not to care.
Because, oh, these people are not human beings,
which is what they'll all tell you.
Not that Ben would say that publicly, but
the reality is obvious.
Palestinians don't exist.
She says, as if genocide wasn't enough, Israel
was outdoing even itself.
Assassination in Lebanon without Lebanese consent, it's a
crime. Assassination of Hanania the Iranian
or excuse me, the head Hamas leader in
Iran without Iranian consent, and massive movement from
ground to top of government in upheaval to
defend the Israel right to rape.
All just today.
We already talked about that in the previous
show. We might not get to all of
it today because it's we're already running pretty
long.
But we talked about it. Oh, that's the
wrong one for here.
Israeli soldiers arrested for gang rape protected by
leadership.
So what she's pointing out is just how
over the top this is. Breaking the law,
murdering people based on your own personal perception
to what you claim their pa It's crazy.
So any objective
c reporter on this would would would cover
it objectively, but not Ben Shapiro.
Because he's not objective nor a journalist in
my opinion.
Sorry. Your friends are getting killed for being
terrorists. Like, what's what is the interest of
being so ridiculous? Like, again, you're talking about
human lives here. This is not some game,
Ben, which, again, damn, it probably is. The
bottom line is that she is simply
expressing that what they did was wrong. Because
it was, by the way. So Ben is
expressing that the law doesn't matter as long
as we get what we think is right.
Very Israeli of you, Ben. Very Zionist of
you.
And I said, just another day, I've been
here openly supporting terrorism while calling everyone else
terrorists. Here is what it looks like in,
the the Lebanese capital, Beirut.
Just just so scared, by the way. Let's
not pretend like this was some attack. Like,
the point is they killed a lot of
innocent people.
And here's Ben making some casual joke about
how terrorists were killed.
And the bottom line is this killed civilians
in a very densely populated civilian area of
Beirut.
Doesn't that stand out as especially sociopathic?
It should.
Now here's what Israel said, the actual Israel
account. The IDF carried out a targeted strike
at Beirut. Oh, yeah. Real targeted. On the
commander responsible for the murder of children
in Majdul Shams.
Oh, you mean the 12 Drew Syrian kids
that you killed and then blamed on Lebanon?
So here's how gross this all is that
Ben doesn't care about even pushing into because
he's got his own agenda.
That they are using something they did either
deliberately or not to justify attacking the other
side. Right? But now goes as far as
to assassinate people in their country because of
something they created or were responsible for. This
is the epitome of evil, guys.
For killing numerous additional children. Oh, and or
Israeli civilians. They're not Israeli.
They are Syrian.
Under every possible dynamic under international law, they're
illegally occupying the area.
And here's Yohav Gallant saying, has Bull across
the red line? Oh, the red line, apparently,
there is no red line unless you lie
about something. Scott Ritter says do something about
it. The point here is that clearly he's
pretending Hezbollah did something when they're the ones
that killed those children.
Here, by the way, is the community they
claim they're trying to support.
The the Druze, which is what the population
is there, in occupied Golan Heights to Netanyahu,
quote, you are using our dead children to
show up on TV. You know who else
is saying that?
Hostage families in Israel,
everywhere, unless you only look through your lens
of US media.
The Israeli media is showing them everywhere. They
are livid about the fact that he is
using their families to act in the United
States like he's fighting for them.
It's amazing what blind followers of the 2
party paradigm can fall into when they pretend
like their small bubble is everything in the
world.
It's disgusting. It's terrifying.
Entire countries can get destroyed.
As long as they high five for their
guy. Right?
Everywhere.
Saul Standiforth also points this out.
BBC journalist asking somebody about the event when
they're saying that Israel attacked. He goes, it's
Hezbollah that's been attacking. Right?
And then they cut over to actually BBC
Verify proving the opposite.
Seem it's amazing how that works out. It
was probably in their interest to lie for
the or maybe that was them trying to
pretend to their audience that they're still at
they don't care about the truth. I don't
really care why they gave you the truth,
but it's also the truth.
Reaction, to what happened here. Point to show
you that their own BBC guy is out
there pushing the opposite narrative. So just recognize
that they're not I in no way am
I suggesting the BBC is informing you correctly
in any sense. But the reality is obvious.
If you're paying attention, Israel has been bombing
Lebanon for a very long time. They're occupying
their territory illegally. Lebanon does not need illegal
justification to bomb Israel.
That's called legal arm resistance. It is it's
for Geneva convention. They're illegally occupied.
Same with Palestine. Same with Syria. Same with
Afghanistan. Same with Iraq. They have the legal
right to attack their occupier.
Period. That's international law. So this guy pushes
the lie. My reaction is,
Not not the guy speaking, but the reporter.
To stand, in solidarity
with our Lebanese citizens,
those who fell victims and their families
of this, savage attack
by,
the Israelis.
Hezbollah now. Been attacking Israel. Right? It's Hezbollah
that's been attacking Israel. Right?
There's been over
7,000
such attacks
between October early July. That's according to data
gathered by the conflict monitoring group, ACLED, and
analyzed by the BBC.
The vast majority of these cross border attacks
were carried out by the Israeli military with
a ratio of about 5 to 1.
Well, look at that.
It's funny how the facts matter in right
context. Right? This point is these are separate
things. You won't see that in a segment
where they're gaslighting for Israel, but on a
different segment in this ridiculous BBC verify, which
that Mariana Spring girl was you know, they're
they're they're all ridiculous.
That doesn't mean that they're what they tell
you is always false. Right? But they have
agendas as we can clearly see.
Now what I find very funny about this,
the timing,
I don't know if it has to do
with that one thing or not. But my
point is that you have groups like the
BBC or Kamala Harris for that matter who
are locked, stock, and barreled completely committed to
Israel.
Take 1,000,000 in APAC money, like, just blind
followers.
BBC is hands down one of the worst.
But they barely step out of line. And
they say one inconvenient fact for Israel, and
you get this. The fake human rights lawyer,
Arsen Otrovsky, says more than 200 people from
the TV and film industry have called for
an urgent investigation
into allegations of anti Jewish racism at the
BBC.
My god.
That just screams desperation. What this is meant
to be, in my opinion, is a threat
to other media organizations that will go after
anybody, but they don't care. They they they've
lost the influence to do this anymore because
they're committing genocide.
This is the one I was thinking earlier
inside a paper. It says breaking Iran, Hamas,
Hezbollah
may target Israeli
Jewish institutions abroad.
Statements from Israel.
Oh, yeah. That's not self serving or anything.
Why and see the idea that that in
any way is what's actually happening. These groups
are just, we hate Jews and we're gonna
bomb Jewish things. It's just so stupid.
Of course, it's possible. But it's not the
reality.
Whether by their statement, their actions, their history,
it's just not true. Even Hamas' own charter
has been changed. It talks about Zionism.
The bottom line is that even remove Israel
from the conversation.
Iran in particular has shown themselves to not
just be like the US government or Israel
where they're just
blindly going out with aggression. Right? Oh, you
did this? We'll have to respond in kind.
No. They almost same with Russia. Well, routine,
that's not good or bad. It's not good
guy, bad guy. It's just the reality have
shown restraint when others would have acted.
So in this case, the idea that Iran
would not doing stuff all this would just
suddenly start bombing Jewish organizations because of what
they did? No. If they're gonna do anything,
they're gonna attack Israel,
which, by the way, would be a justified
response based on everything they've been saying up
until now.
But I think it's blatant
that they really wanna sell you on the
the anti Jewish narrative before something actually happens.
And I will I'm gonna I'm right now
gonna tell you, I wouldn't be surprised if
we suddenly started to see false flags pop
off to blame this on Iran.
Mark my words. If you don't see evidence
proving this connection, you I would not take
this stuff at face value.
Iran's mission to to the the United Nations
puts this out saying the response to an
assassination
will indeed be special operations,
harder and intended to instill deep regret in
the perpetrator.
That's interesting. Right? Because the point to me,
this comes across as,
you know,
calculated.
Which is almost always how they respond.
But
stating that we that it's gonna be serious.
Now Adam poses an excellent question, which we
should all be asking right now.
Does Iran
have the right to assassinate Netanyahu?
It's a good question. Right? It's a very,
very important question for right now.
Sure. Most of the people are, oh, no.
Cool. You can't. That's a good crime.
Okay. Well, if it's a crime, then why
is it not a crime for the same
thing to happen in reverse?
Because he's a terrorist.
Is I mean, is that really is it
that simple to to manipulate you if you're
saying that? Like, think about this for a
second.
I mean, there are I mean, for crying
out loud, if you're a republican right now
nodding, oh, yeah. Yeah. That makes sense. You
don't realize that they just got done calling
you a terrorist because you wore a red
hat?
You know, I mean, it's and that's not
just the democrats, guys. There's government agendas here.
The reality is that just because they name
somebody something, does can't we piece through that
that is not always as simple as therefore
they are what they said?
And even if you think that they're just
as bad as they said, the point is
that this we're talking about legalities here.
And the the law does not state that
if you commit x, y, and z crimes,
that somehow this now changes. No. There's you
have the the international law rights for any
country, you got the n to be personal
human rights,
whether or not you're a criminal.
So by logic right now, because of the
way they acted,
that means they're stating that's that same the
reverse is just as likely.
But also think about it like this, because
for this point, it's obvious.
Does Iran have that right? Obviously, if Israel's
doing the same. But ask yourself this. If
Netanyahu
or the Israeli government
is claiming, which they clearly are, that they
have the right to bomb another country without
their authority
because they decide somebody's a bad person or
a terrorist.
Let me ask you a question. Let's just
pretend that Netanyahu decided that Hamas leader was
in Florida.
Right? Living right next to Ron. Let's just
say he's living right next door to Donald
Trump.
Would that then mean that Netanyahu has the
authority to bomb that person and kill civilians?
Let's just say he kills 10 Americans who
just happen to be around him.
Now at least to be clear about this,
based on everything you're pushing about Gaza and
Palestinians, that would be legal. It's not. Just
like it's not legal to kill 400 innocent
people to go after 1 Hamas member.
The only reason it might be different to
you is because one person one type of
person has less value to you.
Suddenly, you think Americans are more important than
somebody overseas, as Iranians or anybody else. Why
would that be? They're all human beings.
Maybe you should reflect on that.
The point to me is that if you
think that he has the right to bomb
a country over seas because he claims the
bad guys there, that means he has the
right to bomb anywhere in the United States
if he decides somebody's there. Whether it kills
Americans or not.
That should scare the hell out of you
realizing that your government is okay with that.
Make sure you think about that for a
minute. Now does does he have the does
Iran have the right to kill Netanyahu based
on what they're doing? That seems to be
the case. I argue neither of them should,
but they're building a world where this is
something that happens.
Now here is how Patel clumsily tries to
not answer this question. But essentially admits that
Israel always has the right to defend itself,
Iran never does.
To
understand,
clearly,
you're saying that if,
Iran responds,
the US will be there to defend Israel.
Correct?
What I am saying is that our commitment
to Israel security is ironclad, and, of course,
part of that includes,
the defense of Israel in,
as it when it faces threats from malign
actors like the
Iranian regime. That is should be no surprise
to you, Saeed.
So so as long as you call it
a malign actor, apparently, nothing else matters. Right?
That doesn't remove the law. That's how it
works.
But see, it's just it's the same old
lazy answer to say that, well, we stand
with Israel, and anything happens to them is
because terrorism is a bad guy. And that
means we can do whatever we want.
But Said follows up perfectly.
So you often speak of the rights of
every nation
to defend itself.
Do you acknowledge that this was an Israeli
aggression against Iran? I don't have any information
for you, Syed, on,
this incident or possible reactions and certainly don't
have anything,
thing to offer as it relates to attribution
and, would let the Israelis
speak to,
any operation of theirs that, that that they
may be undertaking. I don't have a cow
respect to be an offer. Meek, feeble, small
coward.
Really? These people deserve your ridicule.
This is a petty small person.
Right? I hope he suffers every night dealing
with the lies he's selling. Probably doesn't. He's
probably a sociopath, but I hope he does.
I hope he sits up late at night
hating himself for the fact that he is
literally gaslighting for genocide and hiding terrorism
in a very clumsy and terribly ridiculous way.
I'm not gonna get into specifics
about the exact reason you're there.
Right? Or just pushing away every single I
mean, it's, you know, somebody should literally make
a joke about this and make, like, a
skit or a video compilation
where every single answer for 9 months has
been, we'll raise the issue. We'll we'll let
them, you know, basically
yeah. We'll let Israel speak to that. We'll
follow-up later. And just nonsensical, meaningless, repetitive responses
that amount to nothing.
Which, by the way, is kind of always
the case, but it has been put under
a spotlight because of this.
That the whole world.
Any operation of theirs that, that that they
may be undertaking. I don't have a perspective
on that. That the whole world, acknowledges that
this was an Israeli aggression on the capital
of Iran. But Which, by the way, they've
essentially claimed. So it'd be clear. Like, they
just play this game like we don't know
when they know they do. Suppose, you know,
when you when you develop the proper information
to say that Israel was behind this aggression
on the Iranian capital, it is within Iran's
right to defend itself. I'm not gonna spec
I'm not gonna speculate about the possibility.
Same thing every day. On,
this, Said. I don't have an update or
an assessment to offer for you as it
relates to actual reason. Yeah. And so I
will just leave it at that. Okay. In
principle, as a sovereign nation, does Iran have
the right to defend itself?
Say,
wow. It's a simple question. Does Iran, as
a sovereign nation, as any other nation, does
it have the right to defend itself? Iran
Well put. Now here's the point.
Obviously, if you're gonna be logically consistent, then
yes. Of course. Any country, anywhere has the
right to defend itself.
Right? But, you know, you could always put
it well, if, you know, if, like, for
instance, Israel's example, if you're gonna be honest
about it. Well, if you're a an occupier,
in this case, you actually don't have that
right. But in a general premise, yes, every
country has the right to defend itself. But
there are certain caveats that would change that.
Like, that would be an honest answer. Right?
Because there are. There are certain situations where
somebody would find themselves where they technically don't,
like Israel's, where they quite literally do not
have the right to defense when they're the
occupier.
And that's why they try to hide all
of this. That's been stated by international, like,
entities, international law entities in United Nations. It's
the reality.
But the way he answers this is so
ridiculously embarrassing.
Which is that, well, because we decide they're
a bad guy, they just don't have that
right. That's all it comes down to. That's
why they spend so much time trying to
convince you that it's not a country. It's
to stay. It's a ta terrorism hub.
You know, despite the fact that they're telling
you ISIS is the leading terrorism, you know,
entity forever,
and yet ISIS just declared war on Hamas
and attacks Iran.
You know, because that all lines up. Right?
Obviously, we're staring at the leading state sponsors
of terrorism, and they're the ones trying to
wage war against Iran.
Is a regime that, time and time again,
since 1979
has won been the Oh, Oh, just so
you hear just want to hear it again.
Any other nation, does it have the right
to defend itself? Iran is a regime that,
time and time again, since 1979 has won
been the largest and greatest
exporter of terrorism, not just It's just such
a blatantly ridiculous lie.
Based on 0 metric, that is a statement
they've made forever.
Like, literally, while you can compare something like
Saudi Arabia, which puts, like, the foundation for
that is what they built in this world
that they pretend they're fighting of terrorism.
They've created that. They fund Hamas. They are
the ones doing and seeding all these problems.
And even if you wanna pretend Iran is
doing some of the same,
If you really pretend that Israel, United States,
or Saudi Arabia, or any number of countries
they work with are not visibly, provably, by
metrics doing more, you're lying to yourself. You're
blindly following the agenda that allows them to
murder people in your name.
At the very least, care that you prove
these things and don't buy some chubby little
kid's narrative that There's no idea what he's
talking about. In the, Middle East, but broadly.
And it has a clear track record of
not just suppressing,
its own people, but also,
funding, promoting, encouraging,
malign destabilizing actions.
You you mean, like, the moderate rebels or
the Azov movement? No. He's talking about popular
resistance groups that are currently fighting against regime
or a a genocide.
But, you know, but in their spare time,
they go commit terrorism though, just in case
you were confused. Not not the constant nonstop
terrorism we're talking about from US sanctions and
US attacks, invasion and occupation,
murder, rape, and pillaging, and burning people alive
all over East Bay, West Bank from Israel.
No. No. Not that stuff.
Just when they fight back against that stuff.
Terrorism.
Across the region, and our opinion and point
of view on the, Iranian regime is quite
clear, and we will not hesitate
to, not just stand with our allies and
partners when it comes to defending against threats
from Iran, but also taking appropriate action from
the United States Okay. As it, as it
stands. So you're saying that the nature of
the Iranian regime
strips it of the right to defend itself
and to defend I just don't have any
assessment to offer on this No. You just
said that. I don't have any assessment to
offer on this incident. I don't have any
assessment on attribution. I know. I don't have
assessment. I have assessment. I just want to
talk over him. He said that 4 times.
I don't have assessment on he's not asking
for your assessment. He's simply acknowledging that what
you just said was that you claimed that
because of the nature of their government, they
don't they are removed of the right to
defend themselves.
That's literally what he just outlined in a
very long form answer. He doesn't wanna engage
with that though because he's not supposed to
say that.
They're lying. These are bad people.
Jonathan Cook says US State Department spokesperson, Israel
has an ironclad right to defend itself from
Iranian aggression. Same person. Iran has no right
to defend itself from Israeli aggression.
There you have it. US foreign policy in
a nutshell.
How embarrassing.
Now Iranian international English and other other platforms
in Iranian media have been highlighting,
pointing out where this seems to be going.
This is from today. It says and this,
again, this could be nothing. It could be
them hyping something. It doesn't happen. It's media
just like anywhere else. But it says, in
coming hours,
this was 2 PM today, the world will
witness extraordinary scenes and very important developments. An
Iranian state TV anchor says on live TV
program focused on Tehran's retaliation
against Israel over the assassination of Hamas leader
in Tehran.
So simply saying it, it seems that something
is building.
Now I was gonna get to some updates
here.
Make sure I was checking you see Robert
reached out to me again. I've got one
thing I wanna share here in a second.
Vanessa Bili
says this an hour later after that, today,
Zionist airspace is a ghost town. And what's
interesting, by the way, there's video showing Tel
Aviv, the streets, empty.
People are hiding in their homes because and
think about this. They're human shields right now.
And they seem to know it. That's why
Israel, you know, their intelligence top it's all
right in the center of all their deep,
most populated civilian areas.
There Israeli media has written articles over the
years about that. Are we human shields? Are
we being not. That's clearly published in Israeli
media.
The point is that now you see them
all
not out because they know this might be
coming.
And if you pretend that's anybody's fault other
than Israel that took illegal action against somebody,
government, it's just you're you're trying not to
see the reality.
Now she says, Zionist airspace, it goes down.
Meanwhile, Iranian media has just begun broadcasting the
Iran Iraq war anthem in reference to the
state of alert Iran is witnessing. Israel
in the resistance crosshairs.
Now there's a video I'm gonna play here
that just simply shows an attack. Now as
of Robert reported to me just before I
went live, there's already a Israel's already bombing.
Israel apparently just attacked Lebanon and Syria border
areas, which they just by the way, it's
not new. That's been going on long before
October 7th, all illegal, every time. Whether they
bomb a bomb in Syrian areas claiming to
hit Iran, or any or in Iraq, by
the way, which has happened many times as
well.
All of these are illegal every single time
in the US government doesn't care because they're
all illegal. These are all illegal entities in
every way. Occupying multiple countries illegally, stealing resources,
doing all sorts of worst things that we
don't even get into right now.
This is just one other example of what's
been happening. And, you know, you wonder what
this is meant to accomplish right now.
Just showing you the the aftermath of this
recent bombing.
Just a quick quick video. You're gonna hear
more about this coming out. I guarantee it
probably is possibly right now online, but just
as always,
because of people like Robert, T Lab is
usually ahead of the curve.
Now,
last couple points here, and we will be
covering this more. Like, I I really genuinely
hope this does not spin out something much
larger, which by the way is exactly what
Israel wants. I'm not it's not my opinion.
Both Ben Gavir and Smotrich have publicly said
they want a multi front war. They want
original war. They want to drive the US
into this war. They've said this publicly.
You know, sort of like every other thing
they claim is false, they've all publicly said
many times.
But just recognize that. As an American, recognize
what you're being driven to whatever side you're
on by a government that does not care
even about you or your government.
They've publicly said many times how they can
get away with manipulating the Biden
Biden, Trump regime, whatever, the US government
to do what they want at your expense.
Caitlin writes, in the last few days, Israel
has assassinated leaders in multiple neighboring countries, assassinated
multiple journalists, which I'll show you next, deliberately
destroyed a water facility in Gaza during a
polio epidemic, not by accident, and had riots
defending the defending the right of a IDF
soldiers to rape Palestinian prisoners.
That's another day in Israel.
Arsen Otrovsky,
oh, I I'll let you skip this and
make a point, but I've already I'm way
I'm going past 4 hours already. His point
is simply try to make you act he's
trying to say if you care more about
these 2 being killed, which first of all,
it doesn't matter whether you think that they're
they're bad guys or not. It's still a
crime that has to matter to anybody who
pretends they care about international law. Maybe you
don't. They own that. They sure do. They
pretend they do and then don't care about
it. But the point is, do you care
about them being killed more than their
mass murder, rape, abduction, all the atrocity propaganda
they pushed out over the years after October
7th included?
That's just all they got. Narrative narrative narrative,
except we murdered him illegally, but narrative.
Lord Bebo.
Facebook has removed the Malaysian the Malaysian
prime minister's post
because he put up condolences for the leader,
Hamas.
Now look. I get all the narrative he
spun around this too. Same point.
Regardless of what you think, and I promise
you what you think if you're listening to
what they're saying, it's not true
In most ways.
But my point is that this this is
still a human being.
And like like with every other circumstance. Again,
it doesn't matter what we're talking about. Even
like, remember, Osama bin Laden was the warrior
of peace, the Washington Post called him, before
he became the big boogeyman. Most of these
people are used in some way. I'm not
defending any of them. Like, I think all
these people have been involved in some of
the worst things we can talk about. But
who's behind that?
Israel was funding them. The US government was
gaslighting all of it, guys. That's what we
have to think about. Now regardless of any
of that, the prime the Malaysian prime minister
posted condolences.
And Facebook took it down.
They took down his post because how is
that even possible?
That you're not allowed to say I'm sorry
that happened to him?
How do you see that as anything but
very aggressive real time narrative management?
And he wrote saying stop this display of
cowardice and stop acting as the apparatus of
the oppressive Zionist Israeli regime.
Gosh. We gotta start seeing the outlines here.
It's everywhere.
Now let me see what I'm gonna finish
with here.
Basically, I'll save this for the next show.
It's pretty it's very messed up, guys. If
you haven't seen this story, I really recommend
you get into it.
These it's the main point to make again
is weird how it hasn't been really focused
on. Because most of what you get is
this one shot
of this question.
Now I realize this was this just happened
on 29th where they were in the Knesset,
an emergency meeting, where they were openly asking,
is this okay?
And this person says, is it okay to
insert a stick in a person's rectum?
Is that legitimate?
There that's been posted everywhere. People going, they're
debating.
The better part to show is this one,
where this guy literally responds and says, shut
up. Yes.
If he is a Nakba. So a terrorist,
they're trying to say, using the word that
means catastrophe, that represents the Israeli the
genocide,
part 1.
Nakba part 2, and then the one we're
dealing with today.
The point
is that if he is a Palestinian,
he says everything is legitimate to do. Now,
look. Let's just say you think they're the
worst terrorist in the world.
Just like with Guantanamo, we should learn that
that's your the idea you're that's the same
point.
Humans have rights. It doesn't matter what you
what they've done or you think they've done.
That makes you just as bad. We're supposed
to pretend that we're the ones upholding the
better world.
But then when you send them to Guantanamo
and do all these terrible things, most of
which let it turn out to not actually
be who we were told they were, that
should matter to you.
The fact that they're debating openly
about raping people and that they're going, yes.
It's okay.
That should terrify you, especially since your government
blindly supports them and have now are about
to deploy troops publicly
to help defend them against somebody trying to
fight for their freedom.
It's disgusting.
And yes, lawmakers are justifying rape of Palestinian
prisoners.
And we go over There's a bunch to
go through. I'll go over it soon.
It's It's it's an update. And the point
that we just briefly talked to before, 2
things have been argued. 1, and this is
in the times of Israel,
arguing
that this was their defending themselves,
that the raping of these prisoners
was them defending themselves. Really let that flavor
the conversation of what it means to defend
themselves
anywhere else.
Also,
one of the people in that Knesset meeting
actually floated the idea that maybe they raped
themselves. Same as always.
Take whatever narrative you like, any one of
them. Which one works for you? That would
they did it themselves. We did it in
self defense. It didn't happen at all. All
3 of them floated in the same meeting
because that's what the Israeli government does.
Just like your government, pretty much anywhere.
This was just the American Jewish commit committee
going, we praise them for their investigation. That
pretty much promoted the idea of rape or
this guy online actually publicly defending the idea
that it's okay to rape them as long
as they're not Jewish.
This is an Israeli, highlighted the fact that
he's feels embarrassed for believing their own government
even though all the evidence showed they were
raping and torturing them.
And these are people on the record saying
that they were tortured
with be things being jammed in their anus.
Here's an
Israeli hostage that came home that discusses how
they were treated nice, allowed to shop, talked
about politics,
made pizza.
I'll come back to these points.
Here's just oh, and this was the main
point to wrap this up quickly.
They've now released all the 9 prisoners.
All the ones that were arrested for their
the gang rape
have been released.
Why? Because that's what the Israeli population wanted.
The ones that protested anyway. And here is
one of the guys that in was involved
in the rapes,
quickly released, and he says he stated that
officers applauded him for his actions, implying that
he was only arrested for doing their work.
He said he described the arrest as a
sham. It says, quote, you feel they want
to thank you. There were days when they
applauded us.
Very real.
Easy to look up, guys. It's all over
the place. Now the cradle reports that the
palace the the Palestinian that went to the
hospital after being gang raped by these people
that are now being applauded by the military,
they're reporting that they were returned
to the prison camp,
which is just absolutely horrifying. So he gets
raped into the hospital and then gets put
back in the same prison after the people
that raped him get released and applauded for
it.
But just to be clear and look. I'm
gonna go in and tip I would always
kinda based on what's being broadly reported online
versus the cradles investigation, I would lean with
the cradle. My point in saying that is
warfare analysis reporting that the person who was
raped in the prison actually died.
Now that it could be an inconsistent reporting
point. It could be that, like, I earlier
heard that there was more than one. I'll
come back to it. But my point is
I would lean towards what the cradle's reporting.
They do great work.
A breakdown of an older story showing you
multiple testimonies of women being raped by Israeli
soldiers.
An old paper from 9 years ago, sexual
torture of Palestinian men by Israeli authorities.
Yeah. October 7th started it all.
Now, just quickly to end,
Brian Risbiani points out a 165 journalists in
300 days. A
165 journalists have been killed in Gaza in
300 days. Murdered.
Many of them not Palestinian journalists, by the
way. A Reuters journalist was killed in Lebanon
in the 1st week as they bombed from
Israel. I covered it then. Took Reuters a
week and a well, plus even acknowledge it.
The US government never said a word.
And this he points out the overlap.
Most journalists killed in war.
Gaza genocide, 9 months,
165. All of World War 2, 6 years,
69.
All of Vietnam,
20 years,
63.
Look at that. They're beating records all over
the place. Just not for being the most
moral or caring about the law or human
life. But sure, breaking records for genocide and
murdering journalists and bombing health workers and human
aid. Here's the one that just happened.
Points this out about a journalist that was
targeted. They blew his head off in this
car.
This this is this is adding to the
list.
Here is what the US government said about
it. And this is Saeed calling this out.
Just so you know, they were
acknowledged as journalists and ordered to move, and
then they bombed them. This is the kind
of stuff your government is blindly supporting. And
Patel is just or Patel is just
gaslighting the world about. There are few this
is the kind of cowardice that we need
to call out.
So,
in the same
thing, you know, journalists should not be punished
for what they do anywhere in the world.
That is absolutely true, Zaidan. But we have
we have seen yesterday
is a premeditated
crime to kill the journalists for doing their
job. They were right there in the front
of his home
just to show the destroyed home from our,
you know, our colleague from Al Jazeera.
Which is what they don't like.
Al Jazeera, first of all, but also that
you're it's a person from Al Jazeera. That's
the home we're talking about. That's why they're
targeting these people and their families, but they
were there to show that the house has
been destroyed.
They don't want that getting out,
and this is what they do. Ishmael Gold
and his cameraman, Rami. And they were told
by the Israelis
to leave. The scene they did. They got
in their car and they moved, and then
they were bombed. I mean They were told
to leave. They knew they were there. They're
watching the whole way. They drive away, and
they bomb them as they drive. That's the
reality.
Other journalists have testified to this. The point
is that they don't
care. Think about this response after that. This
is that is summary execution. Yep. Syed, I
spoke to this, a little bit yesterday,
and
the good news that we have relating to,
these American citizens who,
have returned,
who will be returning to the United States,
I don't have an update on this other
situation for you beyond that. So why you
mentioned good news about other Americans because he's
trying to hide this point? Let me just
say because you've asked the question,
the reports that you mentioned yesterday as well,
we've seen those reports. We're tracking the details.
We continue to engage with our partners in
Israel,
about any additional information.
Oh, so you've raised the issue.
Good to know.
But beyond that,
when we have talked about,
journalists who have been killed in Gaza,
This is something,
that, the secretary has spoken to a great
deal. Yeah. I love this part. We've said
it a lot,
And they've killed 100.
Well, 165 on the record.
But realize this, so we we go we
we talk we we say it all the
time.
We say, well, they need to not do
this. Right? You heard us. We say it
all the time.
What does that mean to the world?
From day 1 to now, post October 7th,
they raise the issue. They say, we we
tell you heard me say, I say it
every time. Okay. What does that matter if
they then just continue murdering journalists?
These people really need to be held accountable
for what they're doing. And it's very it's
a very special kind of evil in all
this.
We have,
time and time again offered our not just
our condolences
to Palestinian journalists,
in Gaza, but we have
attempted to make clear just how vital the
work of journalism has been. Think about saying
that.
So you don't care about stopping Israel from
blatantly murdering them, but we think what you
do is important, guys. Good job.
Like, you're patronizing the people that they murdered.
I I I think this was just by
accident. I think he's caught in what he's
saying, but my god.
To showcase the ongoing dire conditions in the
Gaza Strip and how key,
certain outlets and certain media organizations, including Al
Jazeera,
have been to that, line of effort. Yeah.
Until Israel kicked them out and said they
weren't allowed there anymore, but you didn't talk
about that. And that's something we will continue
to not just say publicly, but we will
raise pipe privately.
We'll raise the issue and we'll say it.
We don't think that should happen.
Anything else? Partners in the region will continue
to stress with our partners in Israel as
well. Oh, so raise the issue, but we'll
stress the issue. Got it. Very different, man.
So nothing then. We'll just say the same
things every time, and they'll kill more. And
we'll say we raised the issue, and we
told you heard me. We said it last
last time. We don't think that's okay. But
here, here's all the weapons you need. Here's
the troops on the ground. Here's the blind
gaslighting to support your genocide, but we'll raise
the issue. Now there are also dozens
of Palestinian journalists who are currently
detained,
by Israel. Overwhelmingly, they're not charged with anything.
They're held under administrative detention and so on.
Do you call on the Israeli government to
either charge
those journalists that are being held under administrative
detention or the go. Look, Said, we've been
clear and consistent that Israel,
needs to treat all detainees humanely. We've said
it every day. We say it all the
time. We don't do anything about it. We
don't care really. We'll arm them every day,
but we've said it out
loud. With dignity and in accordance with international
law and then I guess the question is,
at what point, obviously, does this become something
that matters?
Right?
Does does it not show you that they
don't care what you think? Or does it
show us that you secretly tell them it
doesn't matter? Either way you look at it,
at some point, you have to go, this
is obviously ridiculous. This this dog and pony
show, where we just act like you're saying
this, and we'll raise the issue, and we'll
that you just keep letting it happen.
And then arm them for it.
I mean, guys, that's my point. There's something
especially criminal about this because you have to
realize that they could stop this if they
stopped arming them. It's, the detainees' human rights
must be
respected.
Beyond that, I'm just not, I don't have
specifics as early as these specific cases to
speak to. But certainly, you urge the Israelis
to at least those who are not charged
with anything
if they don't if they don't charge them.
I I'm not gonna speak to specific cases
in the, He didn't ask you about specific
cases. He asked you in a general sense
if that's the case. And you damn well
know that.
Gosh, I just I genuinely hate these people.
Talk is cheap when you know that the
journalists are being systematically and intentionally targeted, and
all you offer are your condolences, Liana says.
I agree.
Disgusting people. I really hope they can't sleep
at night, but sadly, I think that they
do. Now here, I'll I'll play this next
time, but it's just a sad video of
one of these journalists speaking about how they
do everything they can. They do what they're
supposed to, you know, and they still get
murdered. And they know they're being targeted, and
the world doesn't care. It's gotta be pretty
tough.
Here's the journalist that was killed. Francesca Albanese
is calling it out. She's doing a great
job, in regard to calling the stuff out
in general. And here's what Dan Cohen says.
The guy who pretends to protect free speech
and the guy who murders journalists. Elon Musk
is a fraud.
Just let's you understand what this really means.
Now this is an even worse one. Same
with Patel.
And it just shows you how little they
care about this stuff. This is about
Heinrich Job.
And and and, I think it's Thacker here
who's been doing a great job following up
with this, like, every other week, and he
has the same stupid response
every time.
They'll never get an answer. You know why?
Because Israel's already said they're done with this
a long time ago. He's pretending that it's
ongoing because he doesn't have an answer. Which
because if if this got to a point
to where you had to say,
nothing has happened,
even though we know as a matter of
fact that the girl was talking about in
the car was shot, What was it? A
150 times?
They
murdered this child because she's a Palestinian.
After they killed her family and then killed
the people the ambulance people coming to help
her as well.
And so the fact is it's gone on
all this time, and they've concluded it's over.
So we want you to think that's still
ongoing. Because if you have to end it,
that means either that they're gonna be a
charge as we expect, or that they would've
claimed nothing happened, which nobody will buy.
They're hoping you forget about it. I hope
he never stops asking this question.
Good follow-up here. It's been a 184 days
now since the Israeli forces killed in their
job. Her family and medics sent to save
her. Last month, when myself and other colleagues
asked about the investigation into this, the department
said Israel Israel said that they're still investigating
and that Israel also said that the UN
and Red Crescent did not respond to outreach.
As far as I know, that Israel's they've
they're not investigating this according to themselves.
Like, this is they're past this. And I
forget if he makes a point about that
or not. But I think this is important
because overall, it shows you how obviously they're
caught lying. The UN and Red Crescent did
not respond to outreach from the Israeli government.
I reached out to the Red Crescent and
they said that, no, the Israeli government did
not reach out. So has the Biden Harris
administration followed up on this,
alleged alleged lie by the Israeli government or
sought to confirm any of Israel's claims on
on the half year old killing now of
of this girl and her family? So, we
are in touch with our partners in Israel,
around the clock on a variety of issues.
I don't have any specifics
It's just the same stupid answer. It's like
verbatim
the same answer almost every time. Read out
as it relates to this conversation. I'm happy
to check if there have been any additional
updates. But to my understanding, this investigation is
still ongoing, and I will leave it to
them to to speak to the details of
it. So I had reached out to the
government as well and, while I was reached
out to the Red Crest, and they said
they would get back to me with an
answer. And that did not after we reported
the Redcrest and said that these were things
like Well, it's really I I'm not a
I'm just wondering What what you basically saying
there is they lied about that. They lied
about the Redcrest, and they lied about all
of it. And further responsiveness
of another form of this. Even that, you
know, this government gives them 1,000,000,000 of dollars
in aid, I imagine that such claims wanna
be fact checked. So, I Yeah. Yeah. I
love how we say trying to keep a
straight face with this. Right? So you give
them all this. Maybe you care whether this
turns out to be true or not. Right?
But you just his point is they blindly
repeated the the Red Crescent claim. Wasn't true.
Red Crescent told them that's not what happened.
So the the US government is laundering Israeli
lies, which wouldn't shouldn't surprise anybody here, but
I love that he called him out for
it. We will continue to engage with our
partners in Israel. We Oh, we'll engage. We'll
continue to raise the issue. For for additional
information. We ask questions when we see incidents
unfold, and we'll continue to do that. As
it relates to this incident, I'm not aware
of any updates. I believe this investigation is
ongoing. Okay. Yeah. Just makes you wanna grab
him.
It's just like
it kills me. It that's just because it's
just so it's like everybody in that room
knows exactly what is going on. It just
kills me. Now to rapidly finish here, I
just wanna point out some of the things
that are being shown to show you what
we're really dealing with in a general sense.
If you're not following Eunice Sarawy,
I mean, this is mostly what it seems
to do and it's just nonstop.
They're the the Israeli IDF are literally
it just I've never seen this much content
daily posting videos of themselves committing war crimes.
I I mean, like, objective war crimes no
matter what the context.
Here, it says, it's Israeli soldiers literally holding
a canister of gasoline,
walking around and dumping it all over these
people's homes and their belongings, you know, that
they were forced out of under claims of
Hamas, which don't seem to be there. And
he says, we have here a little petrol
on the bed, on the closet. Give me
a small touch on the stove. Here, I'm
lighting it. Israeli soldiers pouring fuel over Palestinian
buildings before burning it down last night. This
is what you're supporting if you support what
they're doing. This is genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Another one, Israeli soldier posts on his own
platform. Anything less than wiping out of Gaza
and the extermination of all Palestinians
is unacceptable.
What was that again about only fighting Hamas?
Yeah. That's right. None of them actually seem
to believe that on the ground. I wonder
why.
This is one of their oldest churches in
Palestine,
the church of Saint Poriaphas or port Pori
Poriaphas, maybe in the old city, it was
not spared from these Israeli occupation attacks. Luckily,
the bomb that fell into it did explode.
But the point is, guys, they're bombing everything.
They're bombing every regardless of whether it's a
Hamas, if you I mean, quite frankly, I
have no doubt that there are titles in
Hamas locations, but because I get to see
any of them proven, I'm doubting whether they
even exist. I mean, it's like it's gotten
so ridiculous
how little they show based on all the
lies they're putting out.
BM points this out. We've talked about this
before. What you're gonna see is this truck
driving down the street at night,
spraying the houses with what they call skunk
water.
And my god, if you know what they're
done like, their,
tear gas
has been shown to kill people. Their tear
gas has put people in paralysis and give
them seizures, and some people have literally died.
So guess what? It's not tear gas. We're
experimenting with chemical weapons and whatever else they're
using, and that has been proven in the
past
on Palestinians because no one seems to care
about what they do over there.
This is another example.
As BM, who is an Israeli Jew who
lives in in Israel, says most of you
are probably
not familiar with the smell, but it's pretty
much the stinkiest dents she's ever experienced, and
it doesn't come off. It is meant to
be a tool for dispersing riots, but Israeli
security forces like to spray it on Palestinian
homes, balconies, cars, etcetera,
just to humiliate and make the Palestinians' lives
miserable.
Because anybody honest will tell you that's what
they're doing. They tend to do it as
a collective punishment to a village, a neighborhood
that misbehaved,
for example, protested against Israeli occupation.
God, if you just had one thing to
sum up. You know, if you if this
was the case and then they went on
murder and rape them all, that would be
a good one stop equivalent of what's been
going on. But my god, the reality of
the fact that they're just doing this because
you're Palestinians.
And stuff, by the way, my point in
saying at the start is, like, god only
knows what's actually in this.
Now that will bring me to the point.
Well, I'll play this at the end. This
will bring me to the point about what's
going on in health.
He b b m also points this out,
and this is coming from the WHO's information.
And this is what you're showing. This is
the,
a right a a reporter for Herets reporting
what the WHO is putting
out. And it says,
a
100000
cases. Excuse me.
A 1000000 cases.
1,000,000
cases of acute respiratory infections. Guys, it seems
like they're causing what they're gonna tell you
is the next pandemic here,
whether it's a lie or not. They're manufacturing
like, think about like this. Imagine think of
the response they waged for the lie about
what was happening around COVID 19.
Right? The lie or even the pushed forced
injections
in regard to coercion and and and u
EUA
around things that are barely happening. Emergency declarations
for monkeypox. Right?
A 1000000 cases of a respiratory infection and
nobody even talks about it?
Let that sink in.
They don't care about any of this. They
care about using it against you. And right
now you're watching this be used against Palestinians.
Until suddenly they wanna use it against you
in a worldwide sense, then all of a
sudden, oh my god. Look at how gross
the Palestinians are. They're causing disease. Watch that
happen.
Obviously, that's Israelis doing it to them. The
point is, after a 1000000 respiratory cases,
577,000
cases of acute diarrhea.
Think about that. With no real working
plumbing and toilet systems. Oh my god. These
people are living in the worst thing I
could possibly imagine.
And then you might get bombed and killed
and raped and stolen from, on top of
it.
107,000 acute cases of jaundice,
12,000 cases of bloody diarrhea, 103,385
cases of Skibis,
65,386
cases of skin rashes,
11,000
cases of chicken pox.
100 of cases of mumps and meningitis and
a strong suspicion of a polio outbreak.
And what as Robert wrote for you,
they're deliberately causing the spread of infectious disease
in Gaza. And the point is that it's
public. He's already stated.
I can find it real quick.
Was that right there?
Well, I don't wanna I can't find it.
The point is that it's more than once,
they publicly stated, and Robert covers it in
this article,
that they said, well, this will only help
us expedite our agenda.
Paraphrasing.
So I argue that it's being done deliberately.
But either way, they're allowing it by their
with their action because it helps them. And
this is what they're doing.
There's just no word for how evil this
all is.
Japan,
a US ally, now bans Israel from attending
the annual ceremony marketing
marking the atomic bombing, which is a weird
thing to do anyway. But my point is
that even US allies, countries the world around
are beginning to see that you just can't
stand by this anymore.
No matter what.
There is what the state of Palestine said
at the UN,
which everybody needs to hear. And there there's
more evidence of this than anything I've even
talked about today.
Mister president, violence and terror are clearly Israel's
main
and only currency,
not international law,
not diplomacy,
not mediation,
not respect for human life.
There is no red line for Israel.
No law. It will not breach
no norm. It will not trample
no act too depraved or barbaric for its
occupying army and settler militias.
And no child, woman or man off limits.
Even babies
considered legitimate targets, as they've said.
The Israeli prime minister and his coalition of
government extremists and military commanders
believe there will never be a cost for
their crimes.
They believe they can literally
get away with murder.
Get away with genocide
against the Palestinian
people.
They believe it because it has been possible
until now.
No resolution,
no I C. J. Order,
no ceasefire calls have been respected,
No demand for protection of civilians and humanitarian
access has been heated.
And still no consequences
whatsoever for Israel.
This has gone on even as the Palestinian
people have tragically live streamed the genocide
for all the world to see,
believing that somehow the world would act to
save the over 2,000,000
human lives
endangered in Gaza.
Every plea for help, including in this council.
Has been made in the belief that the
world would act in respect of the rule
of law
are shared
moral obligations
and our collective humanity.
Yet this gruesome aggression continues,
surpassing 40,000 Palestinians
killed the majority women and Children
over 91,000
injured in attacks by Israeli occupying forces.
Nearly the entirety of Gaza's population
uprooted.
And the decimation
of the Gaza Strip and trauma of the
entire
population?
My god.
It's just it's just so
I just can't even understand how that cannot
be the most. I I how is it
possible that this is not seen by everybody?
And I mean, maybe it is. I mean,
what this shows is your governments don't care.
Right? I mean, that this is what's being
allowed right now.
And I just the the obvious problem here
is that they are
being allowed to continue this genocide.
Your governments are arming and supporting and acting
like in some cases they care.
Right? I mean, think about this. You're sitting
at the w at the the United Nations.
And and and and what the I don't
think any of these institutions at the lev
at their core level actually care about this
stuff. Maybe individuals involved in it, individual entities
that are part of their countries do, but
I I just don't have faith in these
institutions.
But the point is that even that statement,
like, even the way that the media is
responding to Israel now, showing you some truth,
I argue it's not because they care. It's
self interest. And in the same way, you
can argue that you're gonna start to see
people in this body
who just they're like, look. That they they
covet the power that they have.
Now, suddenly, you're gonna start to see that
they go, well, we can't just continue to
let them destroy
all of this. Even though they're a major
part of of that lie,
at some point, they just go, well, they
they're not worth it anymore. We'll take all
of the attacks from Israel, the claims of
anti semitism, which they already do anyway,
in order to force that back in, which
doesn't mean good. Like, I'll play this last
video. It might is what I think this
means.
As we've all predicted, blaming it on net
in yahoo and acting like that was the
only problem and that's what I expect. But
recognize what she's listing off there is the
reality that they've been putting this in front
of the world. Where's the action? Where's the
response to the fact that they don't even
the, I the order's coming down from international
courts, and they still say they don't care.
All the groups
speak giving lip service to caring about all
these things, and they just blind themselves to
it. Not only that, they fund the continuing
genocide.
So at some point, there will be a
breaking point.
Even people being blackmailed and threatened or something
something's gonna happen where they just can't maintain
it anymore.
And my argument is it'll be a way
that they will try to maintain the control
structure, and we need to fight to make
something new. Not a greater reset.
Right? Not a greater reset, but as Derek
would talk about it, a greater
concept, greater reset in the way of natural
directions.
If you haven't looked up the greater reset,
his whole point is that there are there
are obvious problems in the world, but there
are plenty other directions than the way they
wanna drive you into some technocratic biometric control
system.
The idea is the opposite direction.
Or really, your choice, not because they tell
you so. But I worry about what I'll
end with here, that they're gonna try to
blame this on one person who everybody already
hates anyway in Israel, everywhere else, and try
to act like he was the only one.
And while they all reap the benefits, how
horrible that is from everything that they've done.
We can't let that happen.
We need to change
because of this horrible reality.
We need to use that to change, to
marshal this into something better. I know we
can do that.
And I know because of their passive
opportunism, you know, they're kind of a way
they'll just they'll follow along with whatever the
we can make this happen. And they'll try
to subvert it like they always do, but
we can use this to make things better
even in a small way. And I damn
it. If we're not here to do that,
why are we here in the first place?
To help me fight for that. Help me
fight against all the liars and all the
partisan nonsense. And
show people that there are people out here
that care. That genuinely care about the right
things for the right reasons. And and even
then still make mistakes.
But own those mistakes.
And follow-up on those mistakes.
Alright? We we care about integrity and truth
and human life
at the expense of it. You know, I'm
not some political agendas not circumvent those things
day to day. Those things are paramount.
And I think we can do that.
So thank you for tuning in today. I
know it was long show. As I said,
realistically all the stuff that we did covered
even the time I skipped quite frankly, we
could have made this a 7 hour show
but it's more important to get, you know,
at least
I guess, within our allowable window of time
where most of the world thinks it's too
long. But I'll tell you right now, I
genuinely think that
I get those people that push back and
act like these shows are, you know, so
long, nobody follows it. But I'll I'll tell
you, I I think it's the opposite. And
I think that's why most people that say
that, I know I know there are you
out there that have that real opinion. I'm
not saying you're fake. Plenty of you and
I get it. I actually feel the same
way in some cases. But most of the
people that I get that push from are
people that I don't recognize.
And in history, all of the most historically
famous
venues and shows have always been the long
form conversation, whether at The Rogue Inn or
any of them.
So, I find it very odd that this
seems to be the thing. And I think
this is why
we're breaking through with the nonpartisan objective effort,
which in most cases is
aggressively suppressed. It's because we go the grassroots
level and through you know, I I think
we're making a difference, guys, and I think
it's pissing people off.
So help me piss people off. I love
you all. Thank you for being here. As
always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
On his visit to the US and everything
else that has happened in Netanyahu's visit to
the US and everything else that has happened
in the past week has actually further proven
that he isn't the real problem. And this
might be a controversial take. But in a
healthy society, he'd be an outcast. And in
a world with the right systems and institutions
in place, he wouldn't get very far. He'd
be irrelevant.
He's the symptom of multiple very sick societies
and a corrupt international order. When 58% of
the population says that the military committing genocide
should increase their firepower
and when hundreds of people protest the detainment
of sexual predators and torturers,
something is very wrong. When Americans can look
at the image of a father holding his
beheaded child and then go about their day
saying nothing,
Our society is not okay. When ICJ,
ICC and UN Security Council orders all are
defied by leaders of countries that help set
those institutions up, the double standards and corruption
is very clear. When a war criminal receives
a standing ovation in Washington, it reveals just
how empowered and enabled he is.
I believe he should be held accountable, and
I fully support those who protest him. But
I anticipate when this is over, Netanyahu will
be Israel's scapegoat, the US's scapegoat, and the
world's scapegoat,
a way for all who are complicit to
shift blame, to say they couldn't control him
or they didn't know how bad it really
was. If we go down that path, we
won't solve anything. We won't prevent this from
happening again or continuing.
To address this properly, to address this at
the root here, we have to see beyond
the few individuals who've benefited from and perpetuated
this genocide and understand the masses and the
systems that enabled them, protected them, and allowed
for their rise in the first place.