Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
July 29,
2024. Thank you for joining me today. Lot
of follow ups from yesterday's show,
especially around Venezuela, that I find it really
interesting how this is tying into a lot
of different things.
But we're gonna start today with a talk
around
the the same kind of thing we've been
kinda what I see kind of strung along
a lot of these topics right now around
the 2 party illusion,
the aggressive aiming at the right in regard
to
decades long agendas, really, but largely coming through
the COVID 19 agenda, the great reset conversation,
at least as I kind of see it,
the same thing, the digital ID, the the
things that we had seen historically the right
being most resistant to.
And now seeing a lot of these begin
to to develop behind the scenes of agendas
that are being presented is completely something else
aimed at cancel culture or fighting the woke
left or whatever else.
And and I my opinion, tricking people on
the right, conservatives, into believing that they're fighting
for something else. And I'm gonna start with
a point around this
that I think is really important that highlights
it's using a clip from Alex Jones, but
it's not really necessarily about Alex other than
I see him as a part of this
larger and this larger concept. And it's just
peep the the partisanship and the way that
it's
and it could be
not necessarily nefarious that people are arguing for
what they believe is is what is the
truth or what they see as what's correct.
You know, our side is right. We're all
fighting for the right things. Therefore, when we
do this, that means we're doing it from
a good place, and they're doing it over
there to deceive you. But when you back
away from it,
they're both literally doing the same thing. They're
just saying, no. It's this. No. It's that.
And then acting like they have some kind
of more moral superiority. And maybe you think
that. Maybe that's the case.
But I think it's very alarming to see
how much of this is taking up the
conversation, and a lot of good people are
falling prey to it and falling for,
I guess,
I I the the best thing really to
say, and this is what I've been calling
it for a long time, and I'm not
the one that even coined this, but team
sport politics,
where you are essentially choosing a side that
doesn't really come down to really what's even
best for you in the long run. It's
really and that's how it's you know, you
usually make it make sense, but it's really
about fighting for a win to say that
we beat the other side. And that's what
a lot of this comes down to, and
a lot of people within it are are
only about that, trying to benefit themselves through
it on top of all of that. So
we're gonna start with this point, which then
comes into a discussion around Twitter
and verification,
something that I was actually surprised to find
out. And it only happened because of this
really ridiculous troll that's pretending to be me
on Twitter, and I was going to kind
of flag Twitter's attention to it and realized
that they were asking me to verify through
Authentics.
The Israeli
unit 8200 intelligence
route based
verification system that, as I understand it, works
with a vast majority of Israeli intelligence that
has nothing to do with, the verification platform.
A very alarming thing. Something Censored Man did
a great job calling out, really pushing. I
think that's largely why Elon at least claimed
to stop it. Now maybe it will stop
later, but I think it's an important point
to make. Unless I'm missing something that this
is still being used,
and we're still being forced to check, you
know, boxes that say, I confirm this is
okay. There's a whole legal process there that
wouldn't just
lazily be left as some kind of mistake
or discrepancy.
If they're claiming Stripe is the one, then
that means there's not a legal document being
signed for Stripe allowances. There's a whole legal
element to this. So with this being there,
that shows me that this is still being
used right now.
Despite what Elon put out publicly, which I
think is very interesting. And And it lines
up with a lot of other stuff. But
we're also gonna talk about Venezuela, a large
bulk of the conversation today. A lot of
this weirdly, and I think
meaning
overlapping with Twitter is what I was gonna
say, and Elon Musk. But I think there's
much more to that. And it's not just
these couple of topics. Like, it's the same
kind of developing
I don't even wanna say leadership, but just
kind of this power structure that's
not necessarily rooted in some kind of executive
branch or administration.
But it's I think it's really like we
know what it is. Put it this way.
It's it's technocracy
showing its face. We've seen this in the
past where, like, Obama and Citigroup and these
different points where you can clearly see, which
there's usually way more than just one kind
of central entity, but a group that seems
to have been largely
behind the lobbying and influencing of the outcome.
And we've talked for a long time about
how this is more of a political front
to, know, people behind the scenes that are
whether other countries or other power structures or
religion or whatever you think it is that
are really driving things. And I think we've
seen, as Matt Ehret done a lot of
good work calling out, this sort of this
time where the people that have always sort
of been behind the scenes that chose to
kind of fall back and allow you to
think you've been voting and putting people in
place, Right now, suddenly going, okay. We're kinda
done with that. We're gonna step back out
into the light. And that's the world the
World Economic Forum, the idea of globalization, the
idea of public private partnerships. And all of
this is meant to drive them back into
the front as the actual leaders. And I
think we're seeing this, and These are all
theories, but I think there's a lot I
think this is very valid.
We're now seeing the Vance and Elon, Peter
Thiel, and all these entities sort of stepping
out as
driving a lot and lot more than just
the the presidential election conversation.
And I I know a lot of people
feel that. I know a lot of people
are resistant to call it out because of
partisanship, and that's that's one of the biggest
problems. But the Venezuela conversation,
back to the point,
weirdly ties back around to all these same
kind of things, whether that's just because of
war, regime change, but specifically Elon Musk playing
a role sort of beginning this digital coup
around Venezuela for the however many times we've
seen the US government try to coup Venezuela.
And driving this whole push right now of
people that are screaming and clamoring for some
kind of action to, I guess, put the
person they want in place because that's democracy.
It's really interesting.
Now we're also gonna talk about a really
disgusting story coming out of Israel
from the,
said Taemin
torture camp, essentially. And that's this is not
even a hyperbolic term. It's been verifiably sated.
It's been acknowledged by the leadership. It's been
discounted as that's not even a problem, that
that they can do whatever they want publicly
stated by people like the Smotrichs and Ben
Gavirs of the of the conversation.
And now we're gonna talk about a really
disgusting addition to this story, not just the
previous developments around,
you know, evidence showing them using metal,
iron hot pokers up people's anuses or torture
or rape or all sorts of things we've
heard then proven by human rights groups and
testimony
and insiders.
There is this there's an a discussion now
that just happened of the same location
of Palestinian detainees. And I'm gonna show you,
as we all know,
most of which aren't even being charged, most
of which aren't even criminals,
are
they were in this prison. They're being accused
of something.
Military,
along with leadership and from and supported by
levels of the leadership, broke into this area
and raped, gang raped women and men that
are being held in custody.
Then after they were detained,
the leadership came back with another mob and
basically forced their way in in some cases
and are protesting that they be released, calling
some of these rapists
heroes.
It's I mean, there's no way to misunderstand
this story. This is not every Israeli, not
every Jew, but 100%
the leadership of this coalition and largely the
Israeli government. It is the Zionist influence on
the people of this country and the government
we're talking about. I mean, I just don't
know how many more ways we could make
this obvious.
I think, again, it's just down to people
who just don't want to see it. And
those people, you'll never really reach.
Now we're gonna get into a lot of
other things as well. A lot of stuff
around this that I think are very important
to cover, but we'll leave it there for
now. Let's start with the main point, oh,
actually, that's not where I'm starting over here.
That I'm able to start with anyway, which
I think is interesting
around
the 0 hedge article.
CIA denies Trump shooter was subject of
k ultra program,
which is this is just a funny way
to start this really, but it's interesting. And
it's just showing you my opinion, which is
that, you know,
as always, the 2 party illusion, the paradigm
is being driven by just subjective, assumptive,
just
team sport politics.
And what what's interesting about this and I
actually do have one thing that got very
at the last second that some that I
think Orwell shared with me around a video
from Trump conversation. There's a couple of follow
ups from yesterday's show very briefly. I'll show
you after this.
But this is so interesting to me, 1,
because, obviously, there's a lot of question around
this kid, around what happened there. And still
to this very moment, just unbelievable amount of
inconsistencies around this story. Watch our last show
and many before it to get more into
that if you'd like.
But there's a conversation obviously that anybody should
ask is whether this person is influenced in
some way or all the way to the
level of an MK Ultra program if if
you don't know what that is.
People tend to call it some mind control.
The whole program was a hell of a
lot more than just that. Horrifying speaking of
rape and and all sorts of actions like
that, there was sexual overlaps, experimentation,
horrifying stuff your government's done and still does
to you all the time that we find
out 10, 20 years later.
The point is that, obviously, this could be
something that's wrapped in with this. And I've
talked about this before that the documents show
that despite their statements,
it went on well past when they said
it ended in the seventies.
Now the point is that it's clear. You
can see it. It kinda got scattered in
multiple programs, and, obviously, this stuff is still
happening in different ways. This is not hard
to show, but the actual name, you guys
can decide for yourself whether that program was
stopped. And I I think it's pretty easy
to show that it did not. But that
aside, the point was that people in the
rice started having this conversation, which, of course,
this is important to bring up. Let's discuss
whether this is possible. Yes. Obviously. Okay. Let's
discuss the evidence we have, which appears to
be pretty much nothing. Doesn't mean it's not
the case. What evidence shows he was part
of this program? What evidence shows that this
was something that we should continue to
to make a central part of this conversation?
As far as I can tell, not much.
So that's where you would normally leave it.
Okay. Well, it's interesting. Clearly, there's some anomalies
in this that make you wonder whether this
is part of that program. You put it
aside, we come back. That's what we would
do. That's what the objective researcher would do.
Now, some it as usual in the partisanship,
it took over the a huge part of
this conversation. People are interviewing people that were
part of this and they but, you know,
that's always interesting. But in the sense that
it's developing this story, which that's based on
that's the point I make about assumption on
top of assumption, and then narratives are built
based on things that didn't even happen.
But this all comes back to the point
I'm making where the CIA stood up and
said he wasn't part of that program,
which is I just I mean, I can't
help but laugh.
Now, of course, could that mean that this
is the way of them
making you think it's, you know, we he
we deny it.
Sure. They could be denying it because that's
actually the case.
But think about the stupidity of how that
actually may the way this is going down.
Of course, you could argue that they would
do that knowing that we would then think
that's the case or knowing that someone like
me would come out and say they wouldn't
do it if they did. You know,
whatever 4 d chess or whatever you wanna
call it. Of course, they could and that's
what the reality is. They tend to think
very far ahead. It's the point I always
make about just because they deny it doesn't
mean it's true, or just because the media
says it doesn't mean the opposite is true.
It and often a good point to start.
But if we can't think at this point
that they've already thought that far ahead to
go, hey. If we come out and say
that's not true, they'll probably think the opposite.
I'm pretty sure they can think past that.
So my point in saying all of this
is it's funny to me that this comes
out and you get what you might expect.
Pretty much all the conversation from pretty high
level accounts as well going, so that's what
happened. So this is the case. We knew
it. MK Ultra was part of this. Like,
the same kind of things you'd expect, which
again, possibly, sure.
That's all the point I'm making here. Gizmodo
says, the CIA denies conspiracy theory that it
used MK Ultra on the shooter. I said,
so the right says the left are easy
to troll.
It's really that the 2 party illusion is
easy to troll. It's the same point we're
making about cancel culture, wokeism, whatever. They're the
same thing with different versions, different flavors of
the same program, the same illusion, the same
subjective,
assumptive process.
Not conservatives and liberals. That exists and there
is an overlap. But I'm talking about the
team sport politics,
democrat, republican.
That's not even close to the majority of
the conversation even with it even with conserv
conservatives and liberals. Remember, the largest voting block
of every election are people that do not
partake. The largest voting block within the ones
that do always register as independent. But let's
keep pretending like this is the biggest conversation.
Anyway, the point is,
I wrote, here's the right being trolled by
the CIA, because that's what I think this
is. Whether it's the truth or not, they
came out and said that so you would
fall into that. Oh my god. They say
they called it out. It's they said it's
not. Therefore, it has to be.
And to me, it's most likely the case
that they're just making this happen. They're saying
that because that's the reaction. The program is
very real, to reiterate,
and likely never ended. That's my opinion.
But at best, this is conjecture at the
moment. Which I think is that's why this
happened. But as of course, any right for
those of the podcasts where it's, you know,
one lowercase, one upper case kind of writing,
I put, but saying no means yes.
Very simplistic thinking. So if my point in
starting with this is to show you that
it's not just one side or the other.
It's not that the right is the same
one and the left is the stupid ones
or vice versa, however you wanna frame this
from your partisan perspective. If you're trapped in
the 2 party illusion, I'm hoping that you
will begin to recognize that you're all being
played in very selective ways that lead ultimately
to the same point for the government.
That is always what this is about. Not
one side of the left, but the government,
because that's what we're actually dealing with. The
Americans, the people, and the government.
And they love to make you think that
they're scattered and flint, and you're fighting for
one side versus the other, the inside, the
white hats. Yes. Those things do exist in
some level, but the overarching point is that
the government
uses these things to make you think you're
fighting your neighbor as opposed to them.
And it doesn't have to be fighting if
you don't wanna look at it that way,
but resisting, checking, questioning, pushing back, speaking truth
to power.
Not to your neighbor, which is what they
want you to do, screaming at them about
what you think happened, but to them.
All of them together.
So on the note of the left or
the right and being trolled in the same
way, I wanna I wanna get into this
video. And this goes back to the thing
I was just talking about yesterday. The video
of I'm a Christian or I'm not a
Christian or whatever. What was the point that
I made? Do you remember?
I thought it was interesting. And I'm not
coming from a left right perspective as this
video, as typical from a partisan perspective, especially
someone like him. It gets framed as this
all or nothing. You know, if they're doing
this, they're a democrat and they're doing it
because of this.
Well, I'm not either.
I wasn't wrapped up in this tweet like
it was some bombshell point. I just thought
it was interesting. Sounds like he says kind
of a weird middle ground, he could've said
I'm a Christian or I'm not Christian. He
could've said either one, frankly, doesn't really matter
that much to me.
I think we know about his history and
what he's written and so on, that's for
you to look into.
I simply ended with saying, well, we don't
know. And nobody does. Only Trump truly knows
what he said.
That's where that has to end. And on
top of that, I thought it was even
more interesting about what he said on top
of that, which, you know, you don't have
to vote again, we'll fix it. Of course,
he could mean any number of things. Trump
says nonsense all the time, and maybe he
said it just to troll you. Right? All
these things are possible. Anybody saying they know
for sure is simply telling you what they
want you to think,
just like you're about to hear. And what
I find really interesting about this and again,
it's not just him, it's the cult partisanship.
And the left doing the same thing in
reverse, and it's all over the place. What
I'm gonna show you here is the two
sided game of this all.
He's gonna tell you about this
discussion around something that's used psychologically to make
you think something that's not the reality. And
what I want you to think about is
the fact that that's literally what he goes
on to do. Now maybe he just believes
he's in the right, that he's actually just
forcefully, repeatedly replaying the thing he wants, the
truth.
Or he's doing it exactly what he's saying
they're doing in reverse, which is telling you
what you're supposed to hear and then making
sure you hear it. Now maybe both sides
aren't coming from a nefarious place, maybe both
sides just think the thing they think. There's
always an overlap.
But if you get trapped into that mindset,
that it's all that they're trying to deceive
you and the one side's good and the
other side's bad, you will never fall you
will get lost in that. And that's the
whole point.
I'll read you what coronavirus
plushie said in a minute because they make
a good point about this. So let's take
a look at this clip.
Auditory pareidolia
is a known psychological
event that happens
where people are told
what they're hearing,
they will then believe
that what they hear is actually what they
were told. It's it's a And and that's
very valid.
That doesn't necessarily mean that's always what we're
seeing. Sometimes people just say what they think,
and that ends up doing the same thing.
But you see, the end of the game
becomes that that's what they're doing because what
he said is is he's he's a Christian
because we know.
Well, we can't you you could say that's
what he said before. Sure. I can also
show you things going back before he was
running president where he said something very different.
And of course, maybe he changed his mind.
Now see, that's what an objective perspective looks
like where we end up going, yeah. Well,
only he really knows. But that's not what
you're gonna get.
Gaslighting, it's Stockholm syndrome, it's brainwashing.
Alright.
And then they then he plays this clip
from like a TV show, which is it
kinda goes over and makes the point about
this. But I find it odd that you
wouldn't play something, like, clinical, like, a real
discussion about what this might be. All it
does it's just to save time. He plays
this clip that says, this is embarrassing or
that's what he tells them it is and
you hear it and that is what you
hear. And then he goes on to to
tell you to listen for something else with
the same audio clip and then it kinda
sounds like that too. It's like that what's
that thing we saw going around where it
was like
Lori, Laurel, or whatever it was, right? And
you heard what you kinda that's that's the
same kinda point, right? So that's all this
really is. He goes over this clip, but
I this is that actor. Right? That actors,
you can see him if you stop and
watch it.
So just use it takes a long little
that's why it's not worth if you wanna
listen to it, go ahead. But you get
the point. It's basically
suggestive,
which is the power of suggestion. It works
pre, you know,
powerfully.
Power. Reality. So I saw the headline all
over the news being pushed everywhere.
President Trump said I'm not a Christian.
So I go to the video that the
Democrat Party's posting everywhere,
and he clearly says,
and I'm a Christian.
I'm a Christian.
And
Just listen to this rationalization.
Right? Because clearly, the way he says it
is pretty weird, which is what I pointed
out. I'm a Christian or not Christian. However
it's weird. It's a weird inflection, which is
the only thing we can really point out.
Trump's weird. Maybe he just said it funny.
But to try to just dismiss the one
side as crazy, but you're the only the
point is it's right in the middle, and
that's the reality of it. It's
barely distorted. He's talking fast. He's got a
New York accent, but I don't think he's
got a New York accent, but that's just
me. He's he's clearly saying. He said he's
a Christian for decades. He's said I need
God to protect me. America needs God. Yeah.
And a politician say a lot of things.
And for decades, I don't believe that's the
reality. But also, it's something that he has
shown himself to be, a deceiver like all
of them. That's not a partisan thing. I
think Biden is just as ridiculous. I think
Obama is just as ridiculous. They lie. It's
what they do. People in these positions, whether
presidents or politicians or not. Trump has written
about how he deceives people for Paul for
business and for other things. So that's just
and he and he's proud of it. Maybe
you should be. That's it for you to
decide. I disagree. I think it's dishonest. But
at the end of the day, it's not
to wrap your mind around that he might
say, you know, what he might want you
to think to benefit himself. You know, or
sort of like how he rattled off a
bunch of really dumb things at the Bitcoin
conference that I was watching,
and I laughed about it along with everybody
else in the room. That it was really
ridiculous for him to say things that you
could tell he didn't even really understand. That's
what we're talking about. So maybe saying I'm
a Christian or an other or the the
reverse is just what is my my point
the other day was well as well was
that I don't know why in the world
he would come out and say I'm not
a Christian. That doesn't make sense to me.
That's the logical point. Right? But that still
doesn't know for sure what happened.
We're in a fight between good versus evil,
but here they are telling you desperately,
like they said JD Vance
wrote in his
best selling book that he had sex with
his couch. There's nothing about a couch in
the book. Who cares? This is the stupidest
kind of stuff, and this is what is
meant to pull you away. Who cares about
that? What if he did? Who cares? Why
does that even matter with so with with
anything? Whether there was even no big stories
in the world going on, that's what we
care about? It's all about character assassination, and
that's a dumb thing anyway. But see, this
is the kind of thing you get engaged
with in all this stuff, with the partisanship.
But they let it run for 4 or
5 days, and then AP and Reuters said,
it's fair. Yep. Just like all sides of
the media do all the time. Just like
a lot of the most of the mainstream
alternative media do all the time. You know
that. We've talked about this over and over.
I've seen Alex Jones in Infowars do it
countless times. But, you know, it's all about
projection. It's about making them the boogeyman. They're
the bad and the good evil dynamic.
But it's already too late. It's out there
that JD Vance is having sex with his
couch.
It's just so true. Remember how they said
Trump hates all Mexicans, never said anything close
to it. So there's a lot of good
people coming across the border, also a lot
of really bad hombres.
And for that point, yeah, I agree. They
misrepresented him like they do all the time.
But he also does have some case some
step statements that are very clearly leaning towards
that he has a negative view of of
a certain demographic.
But I'll agree, there's plenty of things he
said that go the other direction. Maybe just
because he says what people wanna hear all
the time. I don't think anybody truly knows
what people like this think or are, but
this is what's beneficial to what they're trying
to accomplish.
Is that all Mexicans are bad? No. He
said a lot of bad hombres are also
coming across. So this is how they do
it. They put their lie out first as
the great Mark Twain said, a lie goes
halfway around the world before truth puts its
pants on Boots on. But in the end,
truth wins.
They are so desperate and I can't even
imagine what they're gonna do next. I mean,
we already heard And actually, I don't think
the truth at the end,
the truth wins is not part of that
quote, by the way. It's actually the opposite
was, I think, the suggestion that that's usually
not how that works out, but that's my
opinion. Paula Harris was never the borders czar,
even that's your official title,
thousands of newscast stories.
Again, what a meaningless story.
Like, yes, it matters for showing that they're
lying, but my point is who doesn't think
the corporate media lies? Those stories are designed
to make you start thinking only one part
of it lies, or the other one's trying
to correct the record. I mean, it takes
a special kind of naivety to think that
that's what's going on. With how long you
can look back at whatever it is, Fox
News, CNN, MSNBC, or even go OAN or
whatever the other underling you know, whatever left
and right are the mainstream alternative EDR.
This is what that's what always happens.
We heard she never bailed out rioters even
though she's all over TV bragging about it
years ago.
This is their desperation level. And so instead
of dialing lies back because they've been caught,
they're dialing lies up. So here is the
official clip
of Trump
speaking
at Turning Point Action yesterday,
and here he says I need Christians to
vote.
I'm a Christian. And they're also spinning it.
Oh, he said, you only gotta vote this
time. You want to vote in the future.
Well, he's And that's the point that I
think is actually more interesting. And I challenge
you to tell me what what he says
actually lines up with this. At the end
of the day, what he says is a
very conf perplexing statement about how you won't
have to vote again.
Now, ask yourself if it's just implying you
for 4 years, why would anybody say that?
Everybody knows that. And you wouldn't say, do
it now. You'll have to vote again. Well,
that's that's just saying go vote. And you
won't have to vote for 4 years. The
way he says it is odd. Now, again,
I'm not gonna jump to conclusions. He could
say it just to get you riled up.
My first thought was he said it to
kinda troll the left, to get them to
go, oh my god. Look. He said the
thing we keep saying.
Right? I mean, it's just a bunch of
statements. He's lied about half of what he
said running for, what about lock her up
and the fed and whatever else?
But what he says is obvious.
It's a weird, anomalous statement about fixing it.
You want to vote again. We want I
mean, you'll listen I've showed it for you.
I've played it for you. But what he
describes it as is straight up not even
remotely what he's actually saying or suggesting. So
I find that odd. Lying for your truth?
Trying to hide the statement because it's uncomfortable,
I don't know, but I find it interesting.
The dictator. No. He's clearly because I know
Trump speak.
He's clearly saying we're gonna win and turn
the country around so good, we'll be so
popular, we won't be in such a crisis.
But Oh, he knows Trump speak. Right? So
he knows. So let him interpret for you
what his meaning was. That we will do
so well that we won't have a crisis?
Well, Well, listen to what he says, and
you tell me how that even comes close
to lining up with what he said. I'm
leaning more towards he's just trying to troll
people, Trump. Now is the time. But they're
not focusing on that part as much as
they're focusing
on
the false claim that he says, I'm not
a Christian. He says, and I'm a Christian
and I'm a
Christian. Here it is in regular speed and
then slowed down.
And again, Christians get out and vote
just this
time. You won't have to do it anymore.
4 more years. You know what? It'll be
fixed. It'll be fine.
You won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful
Christians. That's the first part. Now you just
I've tried to lap overlap that with we'll
do so well, there won't be chaos. That's
what he says that means. That's Trump speak
that Alex tells you that means.
Now, again, I'm not this I find this
to be largely unimportant with what the rest
of we're gonna talk about, but this is
important for the building story around how the
dynamic, the paradigm is pulling people in to
the ideologue aspect of this. And the idea
is clearly that he is saying things that
are the exact opposite, or sort of like
the Orwellian aspect or some people would call
the Alice in Wonderland part of this where
it's just meant to be manipulative and confusing
and nothing makes sense so you just don't
know what to believe. It makes you uncomfortable
and unhappy, And usually, you just check out
and let things happen the way they're going.
So that could be a whole part of
this here. But I think it's interesting because
that doesn't say anything other than you won't
have to vote again.
We'll get it fixed.
And, of course, you could mean whatever you
wanted to mean, but that's not even remotely
what they're framing it as. I love you
Christians. I'm not Christians.
And that the party slows down right there.
Now, it's nah.
I'm not Christian or a Christian. Of course,
it could go either way. That's what anybody
objective would say. It's very weird. It's right
in the middle. It's a weird way to
say either of them. Be fixed. It'll be
fine.
You won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful
Christians. I love you, Christians. I'm not Christian.
And he shakes his head. He literally shakes
his head no. That's what the first people
showed me when I was like, well, that's
pretty interesting. I just don't know why he
would ever say that.
I'm my
Christian.
I'm
my
You can hear either. That goes back to
what so this is exactly what he did
in the beginning. What he was saying they
were doing, how is this not the exact
same thing? Well, because he's on the right
side.
Like, as in the good side.
Right? I mean, just be objective and look
at it. He's he's going, this is what
you're supposed to hear. This is what he
says. Listen to it over and over.
He may mean it, but it's the same
thing. They're all the same thing. The 2
party illusion is the same thing.
Christian. I'm a Christian.
You can really hear either. I'm not Christian,
Christian. I'm a Christian.
I love you. Get out. You gotta get
out and vote. In 4 years, you don't
have to vote again. We'll have it fixed
so good, you're not gonna have to vote.
How do you explain that with what he
was in 4 more years, so after we
vote now, you won't have to vote again?
We'll have it fixed.
Again, I don't wanna dwell on this, but
how the hell will you pretend that doesn't
mean exactly what those words mean? Oh, it
means he he'll do well, no chaos.
I just think that's pretty crazy.
This guy was born in New York City.
He talks like a New Yorker. I am
a Christian. You know, I'm a Christian.
Not even remotely. Am I crazy? That's just
a crazy that's not even close. And he
tries to cut his New York accent for
the general public, but he's a New Yorker.
Yeah. I'm a Christian. I'm a Christian. That
doesn't sound like a New York accent to
me. But they sit there and then tell
you that he said I'm not a Christian.
Now most of us simply said this is
an interesting statement. It seems like he might
have said that. Right? A lot of people
did forcefully state it, but I think most
of them are in the paradigm.
Back this video up on x. Watch it
50 times. Clearly, could he have said it
a little clearer?
Yeah.
I'm
a Christian.
I believe in Jesus Christ.
I'm I'm born again. Yes. But we've been
telling Trump, you need to be very clear
about this, he's been doing it at at
the RNC
in Milwaukee
last week, everywhere.
He has been totally
clear about this
and he got Roe v Wade overturned,
and he's standing up against the IRS persecuting
Christians.
And all the rest of it, you judge
a tree by its fruit. So the satanic
Democrat party that funds drag queen pedophile town
everywhere.
I mean, you know, I'll be the first
that's gonna point out all of the woke
politics and all of the transient, but just
the satanic pedophile left. I mean, these guys
these are cartoonish things to say.
I I mean, they just it's like it's
just like saying Nazi white supremacist right. It's
dumb. It's lowbrow. It's aiming at the lowest
common denominator.
Now I I mean, I'll go into some
of the darker parts of what I I
believe some of these people are tied to.
But to say just every single person on
the left, it's just stupid.
I'm so tired of having to act like
these are honest, goodwill people trying to inform
you. Either they are that bad at this
or they're trying to manipulate you. That's my
opinion has been for a long time and
I haven't hidden that, but I'm just want
I'm tired of how much this is influencing
the conversation.
I I mean, I don't wanna believe that
people are this easily manipulated. I think that
what's happening is people don't know what else
to do. And just like with the voting
dynamic, and they kinda fall back in to
what everyone's sending them because these are the
most popular people or at least that's what
we're told based on whatever manipulative algorithms or
tech they're using to make people like this
end up like, I mean, it's not even
him because he's been on for a long
time. And I argue a lot of the
stuff he did a long time ago is,
you know, a lot of good stuff. But
overall, the current people that I've mentioned a
lot that I don't wanna get into today,
some of that act Trump even literally named
in his recent speech would blow my mind
are just cartoons.
Flagrantly miss dishonest, constantly misinforming,
constantly not doing any due diligence. Like, but
we just played you that clip, by the
way, recently about Infowars,
and T's talking about
Richard, Grove and,
people like Jason Burmes and and the True
Street Media people that David Knight, who all
left and said instead that it's just shocking
lack of due diligence. They just run with
things without checking them, which that's pretty easy
to see from my perspective.
Is literally
and it has satanism taught in schools
where they get away with it in different
areas, literal satanism classes, satanism after school.
These people are telling you now, no. No.
No. This guy is not a Christian.
Well, Trump is That but see, I know
plenty of people who are saying that's what
he said that aren't any of those things,
Who are not part of the democrat party.
Who are libertarians or even republicans. They're gonna,
I think he just said he's not a
Christian. So the way that they just try
to shoot you know, couch this in one
angle, that's why this is a distraction. This
is about trying to use these minor these
points to get you thinking something else. Now
if it wasn't for the overarching point, and
what I think is a larger agenda around
these meaningless topics, this wouldn't even be something
we're talking about.
Same with the other thing, of the so
the the borders are all these different manipulative
points.
But, again, I'm gonna I'll shout it again.
And, by the way, I believe Whitney's gonna
be joining with the conversation of Derek and
and Corbit and TrueStream people in this upcoming
conversation.
It's gonna be an important one, guys. I
believe it's Sunday, so keep an eye out
for that. That's Derek's the one that's gonna
be doing that. He'll be hosting. But this
will be a good conversation because we all
sense this problem, How the right mostly right
now is being manipulated
into these very same things. Like the save
backs and digital IDs. I mean, it's everywhere
right now. And it's alarming because of how
real these things are. And most of the
right is aware of that, but they just
don't see how this is happening. Never claimed
he's Jesus. He's never claimed he's the same.
Oh, is that is that real? Is that
is that the case? I and one of
his interesting comments about how he's, you know,
he's never claimed he's Guy's not a Christian.
Well, Trump has never claimed he's Jesus. He's
never claimed he's a saint. He's never been
a hypocrite, and people recognize that. He's never
been a hypocrite? Yeah. That's a pretty big
statement. But what about this? If I not
only that. If you take a look,
intellectual
property theft.
Add that to it, and add a lot
of other things to it. So somebody excuse
me. Somebody had to do it.
I am the chosen one.
Somebody had to do it.
Okay.
Didn't say he's a saint, didn't call himself
a god, but he sure as hell looked
up at the sky and said, I am
the chosen one. Now, yes, he could've been
jesting.
But let's not forget that Israel
is
adamantly, in many cases, the leadership saying that.
People in Zionists, they literally calling him whether
it was the prophet or the chosen, or
something like that. We've seen this overlap a
lot.
A lot of his followers, after the assassination
attempt especially,
are are openly saying that he is sent
by God.
It's a terrifying reality to think people are
act I mean, do you know what that
drives to? We're talking about the level of,
like, religious crusade type mindset that will act
out. That's what the Israeli Zionists are doing,
acting out in aggressive, disgusting violence,
rape, torture, murder, because they believe they're on
the right side by God's will
in some cases.
Doesn't that alarm people? So the reality is
not a sin by he never said. They'll
say, yeah. He kinda did, though. Even if
you think he's joking, people believe this stuff.
And I've seen you all I don't have
to sell it on you guys. You could
look around the Internet. People are saying, I
know personally somebody connected close to our family
that is expressing those thoughts.
That's somebody even talking about the the meeting
with net Netanyahu.
So, oh my god, look at how wonderful
it was. He hugged them and they were
so, like, that they were sent that these
are prophets. They're sent by god. That's actually
their mindset. And we're talking about Netanyahu for
crying out loud. The guy that should've been
arrested before he went to Mar a Lago
because he's committed genocide.
Somebody excuse me. Somebody had to do it.
I am the chosen one. Somebody had to
do it. So I'm Literally,
it has satanism taught in schools
where they get away with it in different
areas, literal satanism classes, satanism after school.
These people are telling you now, no, no,
no, this guy is not a Christian.
Well, Trump has never claimed he's Jesus. He's
never claimed he's a saint. He's never been
a hypocrite, and people recognize that and know
that, but they are so desperate. My question
is, what are they gonna pull next? I
mean, literally,
thousands of different accounts
have been posting all of this stuff, the
Krasenstein,
you know, all of them saying, oh, no.
Trump is saying he's not a Christian. They
are so incredibly
desperate right now. Alright. That's it for the
special
You could think what you want about that.
I just think it's important to recognize
how obvious this is. Here's what coronavirus plushies,
plushie said in regard to the, pareidolia or
pareidolia, whatever it's called, the idea that you
suggestively say something, which is, you know, very
obvious.
He simply says,
that's Alex Jones, he says, that is the
tendency for perception on
you
on you usually visual so that one detects
an object pattern or meaning where it won't
there is none.
So not surprising to me that it's not
exactly the what it is. But, by the
way, interestingly enough, you might have seen this
whole conversation
supposedly about the the
person's I don't know how to say it
without being crude. His, his his ballsack hanging
out of his shorts, at the Olympics. If
you haven't seen that, it's not something that's
even that important. But it went around it
went around then it was covered. It was
a major distraction. The point that coronavirus plushie
is making is it turned out to just
be simply a coal on the stockings of
this person.
But yet, you know, in certain pictures and
the way it's framed, it definitely makes it
look like it's something else.
And that winner and that, like, right there.
But it it's just a hole in these
stockings he was wearing. But that just sufficiently
distracted a whole lot of people. And that's
the kinda thing we're talking about and he's
doing the same thing with telling you what
he wants you to hear in the other
case.
Now here is that
video that you can watch for yourself.
And this whole me this media platform, like
so, you know, as they're calling out the
other side forcefully saying what they want you
to think as some kind of coordinated manipulation,
well, here's the other side doing the damn
exact same thing. Well, here here's The Wall
Street Journal editing out the last two seconds
of that same clip. Guys, listen to them.
It literally doesn't
change anything about what the statement means. And,
obviously, it doesn't mean what they're trying to
pretend it means. And Elon does this little
bot response.
Exactly. I agree. Correct.
Telling you, there's something going on there. Now,
here's oh, this I just this is just
what I said about it. I said, you
know, what do you what do you think
he said? What do you got? You tell
me. I frankly find the claim that we
won't have a vote again in 4 more
years is and it's to be fixed. It's
more interesting, personally. And again, people kind of
lost their minds down here.
And here's the clip of the whole borders
are thing, which is what I said on
24th. I simply said, 27th, excuse me. If
this is what you're obsessed with right now,
you might be lost in the 2 party
illusion. Things like this are often manufactured to
distract from larger, much larger, and more important
stories. The gov, both sides, and the media
often lie. It's not a big not a
news story. But when it's this flimsy,
look for what it might be hiding. Now
that's not to say we shouldn't point out
they're lying, but this obsessive coverage of this
entire show is around these things. That is
the point.
And so oh, and I I wanted to
make I wanted to follow-up with a couple
of, so we this is the show we
put out yesterday.
Bird flu emergency declared, which make sure you
check that out.
Jason Basler just put up a clip on
our Twitter account and our minds and our
other pages as well about,
this the clip of the show. What blew
me away about this, by the way, is
that within this new amendment to this previous
potential declaration, where they're now saying it's an
emergency declaration, it literally
opens the it broadens the scope to just
influenza
a. That's the normal seasonal flu, if you
even think that's what's happening.
So, they essentially just declared a pandemic emergency
for just everything, all the time. There's flu
forever.
That's what that means. I it's amazing how
important that is. So make sure you check
that out. We also talked about Israel's false
flag in Syria, which, again, on just unbelievably
obvious with a video that Roth, David Roth
Lindbergh shared
that you can literally see the Iron Dome
shooting up, arcing back down, exploding, and falling
right where they claim Hezbollah fired.
And, also, remember, this is a Syrian occupied
territory that largely supports Lebanon and Hezbollah.
So this whole gay they whether it was
a mistake or a deliberate action, they murdered
children playing soccer, blamed it on Hezbollah, and
then went on to make it a massive
propaganda campaign lying about that, shouting people down
saying, how dare you not call this out
while they're killing children in Gaza every 10
seconds?
And then we talk about the right makes
regime change great again because and that was
kind of my prediction, which even today is
becoming more accurate about Venezuela. We started covering
it in this conversation. We'll follow-up more on
it today in the next segment.
But what I hope you don't miss in
that is we also talked about a previous
conversation around Trump's ear that I really think
is pretty crazy to me. Yeah. I don't
there the even this does not have to
very mean fake or this or that. There's
a lot of ways this could even this
could end up in any number of conversations.
I think this whole thing is still wildly
up in the air. What I know for
sure is that we're being lied to in
multiple ways that I think anybody can see.
The inconsistencies, the the changing of statements from
people in leadership or in authority.
But what I want you to see in
this, what I still think is absolutely mind
blowing to me
hold on.
There it is.
Is that Ronny Jackson, who by the way
is now a Texas congressman who is that
weirdly become Trump's doctor only around, like, this
ear conversation and has been since this happened,
and they refused to let out their medical
records of when he was at the hospital
or let any of the doctors speak about
what they saw. I find that weird. And
all the people around him in secret service
and FBI, apparently, are supposed to be against
him all the time, are being quiet about
it. They refused to make comments about it.
Here's what I think is important.
Especially on top of all the ear pictures
that we can see that we from the
from the last I don't know. Even, I
think, 11 12 days forward, you could see
he had the bandage off and there's literally
nothing.
You can think whatever you think that means.
I'm not making any suggestions on top of
that, but you can easily see that he
has no problem with his ear right now.
And this is why I think that's even
more important. It says,
when Jack Ronnie Jackson released the first letter
Saturday evening, in it, he said the bullet
that struck Trump had produced a 2 centimeter
wide wound.
If you're gonna try to pretend that a
2 centimeter wide wound could heal to being
without to the point of not even being
able to notice it within 12 days,
I got a bridge to sell you. This
is crazy. Now, of course, my point was
maybe Ronnie lied about it to kind of
up Trump's clout to say a lie was
shot. It was a big
who knows? That's my point is we it
could mean a number of things, but that
does not line up.
There's something very strange right there.
Now, it's weird to me how the people
who are usually in the past the most
the the usually, the people that will jump
to assumptive points about these kind of things
without even checking for facts are now the
people that are going narrative. Trust the narrative.
You can't challenge it. You're a conspiracy theorist.
And that's in this article too where Ronnie
Jackson is literally shouting down people who are
asking questions, Saying, how dare you ask that
question? How air how how disrespectful?
You mean questions about what happened as we
can see we're being misled? Do you know
what would happen if this story was about
Biden? My god. You could only imagine.
Every possible question under the sun would be
asked because that's how this should go. But
it's weird that now suddenly there's a resistance
there even though there's plenty of conservatives that
are also calling this out.
It's very strange to me. Now, yes, I
will follow-up on this, but my my point
to this, unless there's something new that really
does change dynamic, which I'll show you in
a second,
Which I think is,
where were we? Actually, I should bump that
up.
Oh, no. It was right here. Perfect.
This is actually pretty nuts. This this is
a pretty interesting video that adds even more
to this. So remembering that, knowing that there's
undeniably an anomaly here and the idea of
the angles, wherever crooks or whoever it was
was on that roof, wherever that person was
on that roof, there's no way in my
opinion he could've shot the top upper back
part of Trump's ear. Clearly, it doesn't even
seem like there's a problem with it now.
So even if we don't talk second shooter,
water tower, whatever, how do we explain that
there's no problem with his ear? And then,
again, let's just say maybe he got some
kind of miraculous,
you know,
next level
billionaire plastic surgery. Right? Just throwing it out
there that that we don't even know how
good it is. You can't even tell. Okay.
Maybe that's the truth. Maybe that would explain
it. But that's the kinda answer we need
right now. Otherwise, this is very, very suspicious.
And even then, obviously, I'm gonna question that,
but we have to verify these things. But
here's a video that was put out by
Matt Lownter,
sniper's nest video that was released by Dave
Stewart of Butler, Pennsylvania from 13th.
His cell phone was actually first confiscated by
the FBI initially, then they returned it to
him. Now check out what this video shows,
guys. It's about 7 minutes. I'm only gonna
show you a little bit of it, but
it'll be included. You can watch it. At
the what you're gonna see is as Trump
is still speaking and pretty way before
the actual shooting,
the cops are surrounding the very building that
this kid is on with their guns drawn.
And you're gonna tell me that they're gonna
let Trump keep speaking?
So to me, this is, at this point,
the most obvious evidence thus far, or, you
know, some some other examples pretty much equal,
but
very obviously suggest that this is either the
allowance for this to happen, which could have
been the actual attempt to kill Trump, or
that this was all manufactured to benefit Trump
or any number of other possibilities, but that
they were somehow involved with letting him stay
on the stage.
I really just don't know how you logically
make sense of this.
Oh, okay. Okay. This is the trespassing off.
Oh, sorry. I didn't we didn't see any
signs.
So this is at 502.
Shooting was at, what, 611?
This guy's kicking everybody out.
He's raging.
Yeah. 611.
Okay. So what you're gonna see right now,
this is the building. The one you're
seeing right there behind him, that's the building
he was supposedly on. To the right is
the water tower.
Right? And so, basically, behind this person will
be where Trump would be.
Now you're gonna first, listen carefully. You're gonna
hear the people behind him going like, there's
cops. Their guns are out. They're circling the
building. And you can literally see a cop
with his gun drawn. I don't know what
that one thing alone. If a cop had
his gun drawn, that means their their potential
situation,
there's no way they would've let Trump keep
speaking. There's no way. Unless this was designed
to kill him or that there was involvement
with manufacturing some illusion.
You fucking cops surrounding this whole entire fucking
building. Right? Right there. Right there. He's got
his gun drawn. There's no question. Yeah.
That's the building right there.
There's something going on in this building. There's
the water tower. There's the parking lot. Right?
This this is this is the building.
Like and and let's just even say they
don't know for sure he's on the building.
The fact that they're walking around with their
guns drawn. Guys, that's huge. There's no way
they in any normal circumstance, they would've let
him keep speaking if they have enough reason
to draw their guns
or they they have the the the the
justification to draw their guns. There's just no
way.
And, sir, I'm here with you, fighting like
hell to get a senator elected
Oh my god.
There's somebody in this building.
And it's not easy.
Dangerous
people. And remember, there's people in the building
with the window that overlooks that building. The
argument is they left, I guess, to look
for him. But there's all these different overlaps
to where they and there's the snipers that
are behind Trump that are well before this,
like, 17 minutes before they were looking right
in this direction with their binoculars,
I didn't realize they would have gotten wind
of this. Somebody would have said we're we're
investigating, then this would have been clear.
That person with the flag they were talking
about. I don't even know why that was
relevant for that original question.
Take a look at the arrow at the
bottom. See the big red arrow. Right?
So that's what I'm not. That's what
Just mind blowing. I mean, think think how
long this has been happening right now.
When they have enough justification to draw their
guns. Control.
Think they can look at it. That's the
lowest
amount of the legal immigration
Now he's running. There's a cop back there
running.
Right. At this point by now, right in
this time frame, there's already people calling attention
to him with a gun. That's already happened.
Saying, there's a guy up there with the
the time stamps on these, you can clearly
tell that. And we're get you can hear
Sharpless speech in the background if you listen
closely. I'm just getting close to the to
the moment.
Make yourself small, bro. I don't know what's
going on.
Right there. See, in the background, you heard
the guy say he's got a gun. Right?
This is think of how long this has
been happening before that.
So he said, I'm not I can't confirm
this. Just just heads up because I I'm
I'm not the person who made this video
is writing Dave Smith, red shirt, videoed from
bleachers at Trump rally.
Now even right there, we'll listen to that
again.
Right? So under the argument of the different
locations, right, this this is interesting. This shows
you the sound of the shots or at
least from this one phone.
And I would also point out that the
fact that this came out after the fact,
there's a level of suspicion there for me,
right? That this this very well could all
be put in front of us for obvious
reasons, but that's no there's no evidence for
that at this point, but just consider that.
Always consider all possibilities.
Now that last one just sound a little
different, but it seems to be somewhat in
the same location. So that could be the
point if we wanna read into it of
possibly somebody inside the building. That was one
of the points that I think Martins and
others made. That's that lack kinda different sound
of the shot. That would make sense. It
didn't sound like it was far away. Right?
So if this was being shot from the
water tower, then that wouldn't be as loud.
So that's interesting.
And now look, there's people on oh, is
that people?
No. Is that trees?
Right there. Yeah. Those are trees. Never mind.
Okay. So at this point, you've heard shots
and there's just cops standing over there.
Now that was that last shot.
Or maybe not because that was a pretty
long time, but we we definitely have that
last night shot.
Yeah.
So that's the point we keep making about
that last one. So we're supposed to believe
that was the that's the shot that killed
him because they say they found 8 shells
on the roof.
But I just don't know how that makes
sense. There's so many so many
contradicting narratives
from the court from the authorities.
So for me, the the the first part
was what's most important.
I'm surprised this guy's just standing here. This
is really close. Get down, guys. Get down.
Yeah. Just get down. Get behind this tree
with me. Get get behind this tree. Oh,
so maybe Get behind this tree, guys.
No. No. No. I'm just safe back here.
Yeah. Here. Here. Fucking pick that thing off?
Did they take a mask? Fuck. Yeah. I
saw a big poop of hair go up
in the air. Oh, fuck. Yeah. In the
head. Fuck. Yeah. So sorry for the cursing.
So, yeah, so at this point, then he's
yeah. That was that last shot. Right? And
so that's where we got we have the
video where you can see him turning towards
them, which kinda challenges the 1 in a
1000000 shot where they said they hit him
through the scope of the eye or whatever.
And we have the shot now. It shows
him leaning up and aiming at the crowd,
which is where you hear him in the
last time we've shown you that video where
he goes, he's turning towards us.
Again, all of that contradicts the larger narrative
we get from how this actually happened and
who shot and what time it happened. Yeah.
Big poof of hair. Holy shit, guys. What
happened to the fucking the police?
Are you fucking shitting middle of it.
Get your head shot.
Weirdly, they don't seem to be, like, worried
that Trump was shot.
Right?
Because they don't know. They're they're not over
there. How they don't know going on. And
wouldn't you first be going, did he get
shot? Is
not that it has to mean anything. I
just think that's interesting.
I mean, don't you think they're just kinda
milling around? I mean, what the hell was
going on? Like, I get it. There's not
a ladder, but, like, would these cops just
be I don't know. Just everything about the
way they're acting through everything we see just
doesn't really line up with what we would
expect. But that doesn't that could just mean
that they're you know, we watch so many
movies that make us think they're some kind
of action heroes when really that's just not
what's going on. But, you guys can decide
for yourself. I find that to be pretty
damn crazy.
So thank you, Matt, for sharing this.
Very interesting. Now we're gonna continue to follow-up
on this as well.
I just think these things sent tend to
get mired in the kind of partisan narrative
back and forth, and it's very difficult as
they go forward to kind of kind of
pull out the truth of it all. And
it ultimately ends up very like like they
said with Cheadle.
What often happens is they they we want
an independent investigation, and then
they it kind of comes out, and it's
a very, like, 911 report or, like, Warren
report kind of thing that just doesn't really
answer. It's just it's just a narrative control.
And then everyone says it's not enough and
then nothing happens after that. It's almost always
what happens.
Don't. I'm very suspicious as always about these
things.
Now on another follow-up, and this all comes
off the recent show we just did. Here's
a conversation about the Golan Heights. Just a
quick follow-up I wanted to show you.
Where did I just close that on accident?
Oh, it's right there.
And this is Saeed speaking with,
Vatel.
Or Patel, and asking about the Golan Heights.
And I just the way he responds to
this just shows you that they know what
they're doing. That they know it's an illegally
occupied territory, And despite the reality, they're just
saying, no. No. We stand with Israel no
matter what. So what he's gonna say is
that
because of what we say is a threat,
even though those threats are not breaking the
law, such as Iran being present in Syria,
which you could argue is not even actually
what's happening in the sense of what they're
claiming anyway,
they're allies. Syria is an ally with Iran.
They're allowed to be in each other's countries.
The point is they don't get to say
that that is a problem for us, therefore,
we get to then break the law. That's
exactly what they do. And this is again,
this even this, you could tie back into
the 2 party conversation and how that is
used to say that we are the good
side, therefore, we're allowed to sort of ignore
rules and laws because we're fighting for the
good things.
I guess
I didn't grab that. One second.
Syed, Eric had always doing a good job
on these things.
Actually have some, you know, pre reasonable questions
being asked. And what's interesting is even even
by some of the corporate media people, which
I argue is just simply because it's an
obvious reality that they need to try to
regain
clout and control.
Okay. Here's the video.
But, you know, does that in any way
I mean, it's a tragic,
incident, of course. But that in any way
spotlight the fact that the Golan Heights
is occupied Syrian territory.
That Magdal Shams is a Syrian town. That
the people that were killed were actually Syrian
citizens. Does that spotlight the fact that this
occupation
is it time for this occupation to end?
Said, our US policy on the Golan Heights,
has not changed under this administration.
That should be, no surprise to you. I
will echo what you've heard the secretary say
a number of times that,
go on is, very important and vital to
Israel's security. And as long as the Assad
regime is in power in Syria,
as long as Iran and its proxies,
continue to be present in Syria,
by as long as militia groups backed by
Iran
continue to be in Syria, and the Assad
regime itself poses a significant security threat
to Israel. As a practical matter, the control
of the Golan,
it, remains of real importance to Israel's security.
Right. So who cares what law? We want
it. Right? We we it's important to us,
so shut up. Right? Or or the idea
of the armed groups or whatever. Also, so
you can arm the Kurds and the modern
rebels and and just dump all sorts of
terrorist entities in there for your benefit, but
they can't arm groups to defend themselves because
that's terrorism.
You know? It's it the the US government
platform, the narrative, the way they present themselves,
it's never been more ridiculously transparent.
It's embarrassing while they're supporting genocide to stand
up and act like, you know, and even
he just I mean, he didn't even try
what he said is explicit.
We don't want that. And so until that's
not the case, we'll do what we want.
That's what he just said. It is illegally
occupied. That's that's the United Nations. That's the
obvious international law reality, and even been expressed
in some cases through the United States government.
And now they just go, well, sorry. Israel
needs that stuff. We need the water we
steal from that. We need the strategic location
to bomb down Syria illegally all the time.
We need that, so therefore, we don't care.
That's what he just said if you wanna
re break down the reality of the meaning.
So you're saying that, you know, the designation
of the Golan High, according to 242 and
338
as occupied 30 is contingent on who is
leading Syria Sight. And who the ruler of
Syria What I'm saying is that our policy
Yes. That is what
he's saying. He's saying that the law doesn't
matter unless we get what we want. So
if you have the right leader there and
this gets him to the Venezuela conversation, the
leader that they think they can manipulate, well,
then we'll abide by the law. Until then,
we have to act for freedom. You know?
It's just it's just this real it is
it is,
America World Police. It's that movie. These people
are ridiculous.
Right? Acting like you're fighting for, you know,
spreading freedom and you're just destroying everything.
That's what these people are. Yeah.
Our policy as it relates to the Golan
Heights hasn't changed. Okay. Let me It hasn't
changed. Doesn't matter. Stop asking.
Stop pretending like we actually care about human
life. Okay? Just move on. That's that's what
he's saying. So in regard to
the Hezbollah discussion in that in regard to
them claiming that they bombed the area,
let's not forget,
and that this is from July 29th, by
the way. So, this is new. This is
from this is the US government. As we
showed you during the last show, and I
recommend you watch this one to get caught
up on these stories,
if you don't read the overall point being,
as I just told you, that they essentially
blamed their mistake or deliberate action that killed
children on Hezbollah.
But the point is that the US government
has not backed them really. They've been really
wishy washy about it, because I think they
clearly know that this will be the both
of their destruction.
And so they're saying, oh, just stop rein
in. US leads the push to rein in
Israel's response. Don't bomb Beirut.
Imagine having to say that. Think of how
embarrassing that is. You know, because that would
be a crime. Because that is a massively
civilian populated area.
But they they have to stand up publicly
and go, don't do that.
Stop. You're already committing genocide. Don't make the
zeroes. I mean, I don't even think they
care. I think it's about the fact they
know they will lose if this happens, in
the sense of just lose all sorts of
things. Strategic control, clout,
lose in general.
But important to recognize that Israel is the
one driving this, and so who's really driving
the bus?
It goes both ways sometimes. I think it's
the reality that Israel has a lot of
different ways to manipulate them into doing whatever
they want because they're forced into it. They've
already painted themselves into this corner. But I
also think the US does have a lot
of ability if they wanted to to influence
the outcome by, you know, not arming them,
but that's where you start to get into
the overlapping darker things. You know, like the
sexual blackmail networks and lobbying and whatever else
they're using to influence people like Brian Mast
that just out sell out their entire country.
But just so it's clear, here's what they
were saying back on the in December 17th
123.
Grant Warren's Hezbollah.
Israel
can do in Beirut what it is doing
in Gaza.
That's how brazen they are, acting with impunity
in their minds.
So let let's not let's not pretend like
he means, we'll go save the civilians from
Hamas in Beirut,
which is not even what they're doing here,
but this is the fake narrative. We're saving
them as they murder all of them. They
then go on to say they're all human
animals, and they're all the same, and they're
all Hamas. But then when they speak to
some western audiences, they give you the narrative.
What he says, what he means, we're gonna
destroy Beirut. Which, by the way, is what
they wanna do anyway. Ask Smotris, Ben Gavir,
they'll tell you that.
So just recognize, they're already been telling you
that that's what they're gonna do, and the
US government is so afraid they're gonna go,
well, just just don't bomb them. Stop.
What happened to the whole self defense narrative?
You know, which is completely illegitimate argument to
say that you can murder civilians because you're
defending yourself, which is not, you're actually attacking
after you were attacked. The point is that
that is the contradictive narrative.
If you're saying over here because they were
bombed in October attacked on October 7th, that
they can then carry out 9 plus months
of genocide, and that's defending yourself, why wouldn't
this be the same US government?
Oops.
This is what happens when you fall into
these kind of things. They're they're just they're
caught. They're dishonest.
Everybody sees them, and now now they're standing
up in the news and saying, don't do
it, please.
Pretty
embarrassing.
Now let's get into
Venezuela. Oh, I know. I'm sorry. I forgot.
This this was the first point that I
wanna get into in regard to authentic. So,
I just think it's very interesting. Now, on
that note, by the way, the reason this
conversation even came about.
Just want people to see this. Make sure
you so, basically, this account is not me.
This is t lab_a,
obviously, 0 followers, and it has
was joined by, you know, July 2024.
And it literally uses my thing and then
it says OnlyFans horse cock. That's what it
says. I guess he has a compliment, so
I guess thank you. But either way, the
point is that this is a pretend account
trying to be me.
And
going around, commenting other things, pretending it's me,
putting out these things that say, I keep
fighting legal lawfare against me. Just these people
are they're just dumb. Right? So you can
see. That's why there's more of a humorous
thing to be honest about how ineffectual these
things are. But it says I've decided to
start an OnlyFans.
Which I there's not even like a link
or anything. It's like they this is aimed
at just trying to make me look bad.
So think about that for a second. There's
not like they're trying to trick you into
crypto or try to make something from it.
This is a person or an account or
an entity that has been put to just
trying to make TLav look bad, or me
personally.
Yeah. Who who who who thinks we're not
over the target, How obvious is that? But
anyway, the point was this would I wouldn't
even care to show you this other than
the point is that I went in to
go out to
reach out to Twitter and say, this is
a person pretending to be me.
Just block it again, otherwise they'll keep commenting
on everything I do. So I went to
go through the process to say, they're impersonating
me.
And they went to this thing and said,
okay. Fill this form out. And sure enough,
it went to this spot. Which the I've
included the link, it does seem to pop
up for anybody that clicks it. And here's
what it says guys. Don't forget Oh, and
as I did forget I wanted to grab
this stuff real quick before I forget that.
Censored man has been doing great work breaking
this down. And, you know, I think honestly
was responsible for why they pretended at least
to stop this and maybe it will later.
But this is centered censored man back on
the, 13th June saying before verifying your ID
with Authentics on x, read this thread. And
the bottom line is they're working with Israeli
intelligence entities to pretend to stop the bots,
the bots that are clearly overtaking Twitter, that
shows you how that worked,
and the fact that Authentix is an Israeli
intelligence
company.
So there's in in every possible way, we're
being sold out to this country.
And on the point the main point he
made is that it was taking your biometric
data, even if that's not what Twitter needed.
So that's why this is important. Because here's
what this says.
And this in this again is in regard
to, you know, pointing out you're being impersonated.
And I said, well, he says, we're sorry
you're having this experience. X does not tolerate
accounts or communities that pose as another person.
That's false.
They very much do. As long as it's
the people like us or Whitney Webb who's
dealing with this all over the place. Facebook
and Twitter. It's all over. And they don't
care. And I've had this problem before where
I reach out and they don't care. In
fact, they respond and say, there's no problem
here. But here's the point. To continue, please
verify your identity, which why would that need
to be done? I'm logged in. Right? You
clearly went from my account. You know it's
me
because this is more than just verification for
this one thing. It says all you'll need
is your government ID, your driver's license on
the camera,
prepared to take a selfie and photos of
your ID. What? Why would you need any
of that stuff? I didn't have to do
that to set up my Twitter account.
See, they're just trying to course you into
it. That's probably what some of these things
are being done for. To drive people like
me into this. Just hypothetical.
But go look at what it says down
here. You have to check that by the
way, this box was auto checked. It says
I consent to x and autentix.
What do you know? Using my images and
my ID and my selfie, including
extracted biometric data.
Why would that be necessary seeing as how
Twitter doesn't even require that? Because this is
not about what you think it's about.
This is terrifying, guys. That can't This is
un I When I saw this, I So
what I was saying before,
that's weird. I didn't even click That just
unclick on its own. So here's what's here's
what's interesting.
Let's be clear about this. This is a
legal process.
Twitter, I've like any massive company like this,
$1,000,000,000 company, they have entire teams of people
that make sure they don't find themselves in
a position that they'll be sued or something
like that.
There is no way this is oops. We've
left that up.
Which I'm sure somebody will argue.
Because then that means 2 things. 1, you're
not clicking this box for Stripe, which is
what they're using to authenticate you, which then
means there's a legal loophole, there's a legal
opening right there to be sued. But you're
also consenting to a legal process with a
company
that they would in hypothetical, claiming that they
don't work with anymore. All sorts of legal
problems there.
I do not believe for a second this
would be accidentally happening. This, to me, shows
you that Twitter is still using Authentics. They're
still using the Israeli company despite Elon Musk
publicly saying we won't do that anymore.
In fact, I should actually I should've done
that too. I forgot to grab all this
stuff.
See if I can grab it real quick.
Don't if you don't if you remember for
this, if you type in anything on the
search and then hit advanced search, you can
look for certain words.
I'll just use Stripe and see if that
works.
Oops. I can't spell apparently.
Okay. And then we'll go Elon.
Here it is.
I don't see it. Let's go latest.
No. Not that one. He did he mentioned
Stripe when he said this. Right? No. I
don't see it. How is that make sense?
Did he delete that tweet?
One more look.
God, I wish I would've looked this before.
I forgot to to get into this. So
regardless, you guys all know, we we went
over this in the show, it was a
very public discussion where he said Stripe would
now be what they were using. Isn't that
strange? That's not coming up in his search?
Does that mean he deleted that tweet? That
would be very relevant, wouldn't it? I'll follow-up
on this.
Either way,
they're still doing this with Authentics. And I
think that's a big deal. 1, you're being
lied to about what's happening, and you're still
dumping your biometric data over to Israel
at a time when we know there's something
very I mean, think about this. What about
their Palestinians
using this stuff?
In the United States or elsewhere. What do
you think they're gonna do with that? Deny
you for sure, they don't want you using
this, but store your biometric data.
This blows me away.
Now, again, as I posted this on so
you guys can see this and share it.
I hope you will.
As I went to report yet another fake
t love account, which Twitter doesn't care about
in most cases, I noticed something important. Twitter
is still using Authentics to verify despite what
Elon said. And I simply said, thank you,
troll. You helped me see this. And then
here's the troll. You're welcome, mister horse horror.
I just these people are ridiculous.
I just think it's it's worth laughing at.
It's childish. It's small. And if you look
at the actual account itself,
what's funny about it
is I mean, just look at the kind
of stuff that they're sharing.
It's like a it's like a 6 year
old.
You know? And it's I I don't who
cares? Go have fun. Make fun of me.
Like, it's just so funny that this is
what they think might have an effect. But
clearly, it is about trying to, you know,
muddy your reputation, I guess. Very strange. But
my point on top of that is make
sure you mass flag this for me. Oh,
that was the major point there is that
I'm not gonna do this. That I hope
that was clear. I am not going down.
When I saw that, I said, hell no.
I'm not gonna go through this ridiculous process.
I wouldn't do that to keep my Twitter
account right now, which is what they keep
saying is gonna happen. I'm not gonna do
that.
So I'm not going to. What I what
I can see is that for other people,
which tells me something, like, if you wanna
flag this, you don't have to go through
that process. You can flag it as a
random viewer and say this is impersonating this
TLav account. So mass flag this for me.
Go into this account, mass flag it so
this gets deleted. Because it's just people like
this are just they're just ridiculous.
But I think it's important to see this
is a problem right now, guys. And here's
an example of the supposed free speech platform.
Into thin
air. Pretty prominent account. I think it's got
pretty large following. Right?
It's, about a100000, give or take. 96,000.
Sorry, everyone. X had me banned all day
for saying something not nice about Bill Gates.
Yeah. Same old, same old, isn't it? Funny
how we like to pretend everything changed even
though it's just all a bunch of narrative.
Now, yeah. I mean, look, as always, I
got my account back. But I think what
we're dealing with right now is a lot
more
nefarious than anything we dealt with before. Hope
I hope I'm wrong. Sadly, I think we're
gonna get to a point where it's gonna
become self evident, and it'll be too late
by then, but I hope you're paying
attention. And I'll include this from censored man
breaking this stuff down. He did a whole
thread on this that went, you know, a
whole bunch of tweets on this. I think
this one in has his tweet. Anyway, all
in the US can search for it. Just
search authentic on the Centrobank account. You'll find
all the work. It's shocking. It's shocking.
Now, from that, let's get into Venezuela.
Right? And so overlapping with foreign countries for
verification. I mean, you know, the kind of
in this relationship with Elon Musk in a
lot of different ways, whether it's
military contractors or great reset overlap technology or
any number of things, foreign countries. In this
case,
seemingly starting sort of a digital coup if
you want if you if you will around
Venezuela.
I personally think this has a lot more
to do with Israel specifically.
And then just in general, the lithium in
this country and if the foreign policy directives
of the government at large.
So here is what he said on the
27th. Now this is what I talked about
in the last show. So this is just
getting you caught up briefly with some of
the stuff we talked about yesterday and and
then we'll get into today. But on 27th,
before this had to be this is so
Maduro won this election today or late yesterday
into today.
Before that, though, he said, it is time
for the people of Venezuela to have a
the chance for a better future.
Support Maria Corona. Machado is her name. And
this is an openly backed by Israel entity,
who literally wrote a letter to Israel, to
Netanyahu personally, that said
What? I had that right there. Hold on.
There it is. Oh, that's why. I thought
it was the wrong icon. So wrote this
in to to It's Maria
Carina Machado,
in the on 2018
to Netanyahu personally.
Literally asking for a regime change.
Saying we need a regime change urgently.
Despite the fact that it's undeniably
that which you should, look into our previous
work.
The point is that if you end up
feeling that way just because that's the the
narrative from the right right now,
based despite all of the evidence, then you
don't wanna hear the truth. Because it's obvious.
No. Look. I I I you could I
can certainly be wrong. But it's undeniable coming
off the whole Guaido fiasco, the starvation campaign,
the theft of their gold.
People know this, guys. Especially with social media
today. The Venezuelan people are very aware just
tap into their social media. Read what people
are saying. They are very aware that the
US government is responsible for all this. So
now we're at a point where the only
person that seems to be pushing back on
that is Maduro.
And all these people that get shuffled around
him, like the Guaido's of the world or
like Machado, are obvious,
provable
assets or at least allies of the very
entity they know is trying to hurt them.
So even if Maduro is everything they're saying,
the point is that it's obvious the choice
for them is to fight against the imperialism.
And then Anya Parental simply says, sorry, but
globalism doesn't win in Venezuela. And that's her
right there shaking hands with George Bush. You
know, because they're the usually the freedom fighters.
Right? The George Bush lackeys.
This is also what the squirrel put out
this great thread about the history around Israel
funding these groups. And this is, Chavez
publicly telling everybody Israel finances the opposition to
Venezuela, still to this very day.
Which is what we're talking about. Literally
working with the people that they want to
replace. It's and it's like everywhere else, like
the normalization conversation. That's what this government does.
Same with the United States.
But it says, Elon Musk, he writes, the
genocidal Zionist puppet of the of Israel just
endorsed the far right Zionist opposition of Venezuela
because that's what she is. So for those
those on the right that are actively calling
out the Zionist problem in this in Israel
and the world for that matter,
recognize the same thing that's going on in
Venezuela.
But then he goes on to do a
great thread talking about the as he calls
them the rape death squads, but the classically
called death squads of
their moderate rebels that these kind of groups
fund. And the the story it's horrifying. And
it's it's very here's Jeffrey Sachs talking about
a similar conversation, but this is all source
material.
This is actual video of people testifying to
what they saw them do. And weirdly enough,
it's a this one is almost identical to
what they claimed happened on October 7th which
has been proven to be false. Where do
you think that idea came from? What they
funded and committed in the past?
Rape, mutilation,
horrifying things.
Here's Afsh, Afshrin Afshin
Ratanci. I always say his name weird. Marie
and he's from, going underground.
Maria Carina Machado, who has been labeled Venezuela's
Margaret Thatcher, is in fact the CIA asset
running for president via her proxy at Mundo
Gonzales, who's also running by the way. She
wrote to Israeli prime minister Netanyahu asking for
her for help to carry out a regime
change.
And briefly, just the point I said before,
people in Venezuela need international protection. No. In
fact, what they want is the international community
to get the hell out of their country.
But it simply says they're being attacked by
the government forces, the current what they're talking
about is their agenda and their group.
The current regime is criminal by nature and
maintains close ties with drug cartels and terrorism.
You know, even if you wanna argue that's
the case, which I I'm sure I I
think all of these governments are doing similar
things. As I said last time, it's impossible
to make sense of the idea that you're
calling them a narcoterrorist
while you're literally working with Colombia that exports
more cocaine than anybody in the world. You
know, it's obvious hypocrisy.
And it's not about like, they care about
these things. It's about using them as a
means to an end. Support the people of
Venezuela in their quest to generate an urgently
needed regime change.
And then, of course, it says, until a
change of regime occurs, hemispheric and global security
shall be at risk. And their whole big
push is that they will work with Israel.
The re They will have a close relationship
with Israel if you come in and do
this.
And now the the other point and oh,
the oh, this was to show you that
it's not just the left, right? This here's
there's right out there supporting Maduro as well.
But the point on top of this is
that we know that they are pushing,
that they will work more with Israel should
you make sure that we win. And they've
also said, well, we'll we'll move the embassy
to Israel. All these different statements, which I'll
show you in a second.
Now coming into to yesterday into today, here's
an important place to start. Here's Elon Musk,
once again, blindly sharing Zionist propaganda.
This which, by the way, has already been
deleted because it was provably false. Weird how
that keeps happening.
And I said, by the way, well, this
is what we're first gonna point at. Elon
has now deleted, which I don't know if
you've seen, his tweet where he famously said,
we'll coo whoever we want. As he begins
a coo over Twitter right now, in my
opinion.
But we'll come back to this. This is
that visregrad account, which is provably false.
That's funny. Now, this is any of a
different one. This they've changed this thing. This
community notes system is so ridiculous. I'll come
back to that. That's like the 3rd different
change on this.
But,
starting with the point of he'll coup whoever
he wants, then we'll come back to the
claim that he shared, which was important because
it was claiming that the Maduro regime was
stealing votes and boxes and we caught him
on film. It was a complete lie. Vistregrad
knew that. They got Elon to share it.
Too late, sorta like what Alex Jones was
talking about. Right? Too late now, we already
shared it. Yeah. Happens all over the place
in the 2 party illusion, both left and
right.
Before we get to that,
don't forget this.
He deleted the tweet, but it is very
real. He did definitely say it. He said,
we will coo whoever we want with it
deal with it. Response to somebody saying well,
first, he said another government stimulus package is
not the best interest of the people. And
he's this person says, you know what wasn't
in the best interest of the people?
The US government organizing a coup against evil
Morales in Bolivia so you could obtain lithium
there. Now whatever whether you think that was
the rule core reason,
definitely part of it. And he says and
then responding in it or to it, excuse
me, we will coo whoever we want, deal
with it.
And now he deleted that.
Doesn't that show you something? Now, I don't
know exactly when that was deleted. It would
be even more relevant if it just happened.
But I don't know.
But he goes, we also get lithium from
Australia. So, clearly, you see this is what
that was. He knew that was not something
he wants you to see now.
And just in case you wanna see these
articles writing about it, here's Guardian. We will
coo whoever we want. The unbearable hubris of
Musk and the billionaire tech bros. Here's counterpunch.
We will coup whoever we want, Elon Musk
and the overthrow of democracy in Bolivia.
100% what happened. All the lies about the
election, it's the same thing that's happening now.
International observers the world around, 100 of them,
saw what happened and testified that it was
up and up. The OAS, which is a
completely co opted entity, the Organization of American
States, screamed that it was a stolen election.
And then once the military junta was put
in place in Bolivia, they weirdly stopped talking
about democracy. Right? Because that's the shining example
of democracy, of military control. Right?
No. They didn't care about anything other than
the US government getting what they wanted. So
they pushed even more else out of the
way, and then the country suffered ever since
like every other one they've done.
But this is relevant
for this conversation about the lies around the
election, around what's going on here, about the
Elon Musk apparatus
pushing what they want you to think is
going on. Now, also important to recognize
that there's lithium in
Venezuela
too. But here is Elon Morales,
discussing Elon Musk's tweet before a crowd of
thousands of people. Telling it that he will
coo whoever we want. His point was the
same. The owner of Twitter and the electric
comp car company, lithium, the battery, all of
this stuff. It's clear that he believes that
was one of the reasons this happened. It
very well could be the only reason, guys.
You can go back to the idea of
fruit companies in South America and regime change
for that purpose alone.
It's not that far fetched. Frankly, I think
there's a lot of other moving parts, but
you have to recognize how important this is.
So it may very well be happening again
if you don't realize how important lithium and
specifically rare, or I guess more broadly, rare
earth minerals are to what they're doing, you're
not paying attention. And the there are wars
in many cases being fought over primarily things
just like this. Of course, they wanna tell
you it's about freedom and then destroy all
of those things to get what they want.
Venezuela lithium reserves. According to various sources, Venezuela
is estimated to have significant lithium reserves. One
report estimates the country has 236
1,000,000,000 barrels of lithium,
equivalent to around 42,000,000,000
tons.
This makes Venezuela a notable player in the
global lithium market. Gee, I wonder if that
plays a factor to why he's going, look
at what they're doing. Venezuela is being taken
by Maduro. It's what they're all doing right
now.
Okay. Back to the point that he got
caught spreading even though it was false. But
it's still up. He might delete that too.
Visregret has now deleted the tweet. Here's what
it said.
And, of course, you can't see the video
now, which would make it even more embarrassing.
It's sorta like the fake Trump ear shot
that at Alex Jones and Luke Kredowski, everybody
shared without even looking that it so shockingly
fake.
Well, this one was also similarly stupid. Facebook
grad, who, guys, who's been who's been caught
doing just this? Posting fake things and then
deleting it.
Countless times post October 7th.
They're not a news group, guys. This is
a straight up Israeli propaganda entity.
What it says is armed communist Maduro gangs
are now storming polling stations and stealing. Didn't
happen.
Didn't happen. But not too late now because
the narrative is already seeding the entire conversation.
And he only goes, this is messed up.
With his, what? 45,000,000
followers?
That at the time, it got 2.5
1,000,000 views. What is it now?
42,000,000
views.
42,000,000.
That's bigger than some countries. Guys, think about
how crazy that is. And it was false.
Here is Ryan Raspbiani saying,
those are air conditioners, man. Aren't you an
engineer?
Yeah. Probably because he doesn't care.
My opinion.
But if you watch it, which you could
probably find the video somewhere, it's ridiculous.
And read the comments. Everybody's like, obviously, this
is he goes, dude, obviously gets tricked easily.
It's embarrassing. I think it's because it was
about seeding this narrative, possibly on purpose because
you'd want Whatever the agenda is, he's But
it's not just Elon and his personal lithium.
This is a government operation.
And I'm convinced that he's part of whatever
we're dealing with right now.
That's completely my opinion. But this overlaps with
the idea of the the presidency, Trump's presidency,
clearly what's gonna happen in my opinion. Bands
and deal and the overlap and all the
Palantir conversations and all the the data they're
coming from Palantir and Twitter to use for
that?
Oh, and so here's oh, here. Let me
grab the other one I just grabbed. It's
weird all these change so often. So here's
what it says now.
These are didn't it it just changed again.
My god. If this changes like, here, you
just have to understand What you're looking at
with regard to how these community notes work,
it's like democracy.
You know, like nothing we should want. It's
mob rule.
That's what it means.
So in some cases, it might work out
to the benefit of the mood most mal
amount of people if you pretend that's what
this happens is. But, ultimately, it comes down
to just being able to manipulate the outcome
by having enough influence.
Right? So if you have a lot of
Zionist friends and you're all up there punching
I mean, ask Syrian Girl. She tells about
she talks she she actually is a part,
one of the people that does these things,
and she'll tell you that. She'll watch these
things get mobbed and change the entire direction
into a no like, provably false statement.
So that's why I've seen this change 3
times in the last 2 seconds. It says,
those are thieves stealing
air conditioners and a woman can be heard
in the back saying so. That's the case.
I'm not trying to say that they're always
false, but I think it's strange that it's
like a battle between who has more people
to lie or push the narrative. In some
cases, the narrative is accurate.
Here's the other This is,
what it said a second ago.
Oh, that's that's a similar one. Here's what
it said before that. It is visually clear
in the video that the box is being
carried out. Our air conditioning units, the woman
is saying so, similar. Right?
Bad example. My point is showing you that
it's just in you can see that this
is what happens. The point's the same whether
that ended up being accurate or not. Is
that it's sort of like the mob aspect
can very much change the outcome.
But that's what he said. This is messed
up.
And this person says, that's hilarious. Elon getting
community noted.
So, Megatron says, you're spreading fake news. These
are air conditioners. It has nothing to do
with the recent votings in Venezuela. But 45,000,000
views later, it's already changed the conversation.
Zen girl says gen gen x girl, excuse
me, says, oh my god. Every account trending
high and posting about overthrowing
Maduro, based largely off this starting conversation,
is pro Israel,
which is very easy to see. Do you
think that's by accident? We're tell okay. Remember,
we're showing you the idea, the reality that
they are I mean, the the person they're
trying to put in his place
wrote to Netanyahu asking for regime change.
And she's also a CIA overlap asset. She's
clearly part of a larger apparatus that has
nothing to do with what Venezuelan people want.
You should check the check the trend for
yourself. And you could look at all these.
You've seen all these accounts.
All of them screaming the same false thing.
And a lot of them, these large right
wing accounts. Maduro stole elections. Pass it on.
They're I mean, therefore I am says.
Here, Elon, sharing another tweet from the same
fake account that lies all the time. Because
that's not it's not about facts, it's about
nary, about controlling what you want.
Same visregrad fake account. It's an account, but
they lie about everything.
President,
Millet released his statement, you know, the fake
libertarian that there was also aggressively pro Israel
pretending to be on the side of freedom
for the right, and they all fell for
it or the again, the Republicans
of the 2 party illusion, not all conservatives,
did fall for this. Dictor
Maduro, get the hell out. And, again, to
say that doesn't mean I that every person
across the board. I'm saying as a larger
general concept that this was the right was
largely what got taken by this.
Dictator Maduro, get the hell out.
This guy is such a cartoon.
Breaking. That's what he said. And Elon shares
it. Shame on dictator Maduro.
Like, it's just it's just this is what
people talk about. It's irresponsible.
What you're saying is influencing
more than this is not just some guy
with a Twitter account, guys. Not only is
this the largest, most influential account in most
any social media anywhere, as far as I
can tell,
what he's doing has real world consequences. He
has the ability to actually change outcomes for
his benefit or for other things for the
US government.
That's what this is.
And then what's interesting, Vistrograd again shares what
Maduro says.
Maduro calls Elon Musk his archenemy and says
Elon wants to come to Venezuela with an
army and his space rockets and invade it.
Well, of course, they're trying to make what
he says sound dumb. What he's actually simply
acknowledging is that these this very well may
be an agenda to come and do exactly
what we're talking about.
And then he says, Elon, can you confirm
or deny? And then he literally responds and
says, does he have space lasers? Because I
do.
It's not a joke, man. This is it's
ridiculous what the way the the cavalier way
that you're literally driving a regime change.
Disgusting.
And here's Eva Bartlett with one separate example,
but also another false push from a large
account from Douglas McGregor.
Colonel Douglas McGregor.
Even and, of course, he's already deleted the
post as well. It's a different one. But
he also deleted because it's also false. But
before it went around the world
or after. Excuse me. And she says MacGregor
is lying. Or I guess you could argue
he was wrong, but either way, it's the
same point. She says these are not gangs
nor violent. It was it was an image
of of gangs
roaming around to stop people from voting. It's
the same stuff we see every time.
The same lies every time.
It says they are Venezuelans amassing to prevent
violence from the western backed opposition gangs at
that McGregor is white washing.
And if anybody knows these things, there's people
like Eva Bartlett who have been there, who
have watched these things, or someone like Anna
v Martin or Vanessa Bealey who have actually
taken the time to understand them. Or or,
suddenly Blake on the name. It'll come to
me. There's plenty of Fiorella, for example.
I believe she she's been there. If not,
you know, she she's been the one that
has been traveling overseas, like pasta, all as
well. Going to these places and actually watching
the elections, and and they've testified to these
things. Now you think I'd be wrong, of
course.
But they'll tell you a very different story
than what you hear from these partisan screamers
that have never even been there.
And and these peep Ivo, Vanessa, these aren't
left. They're these are people that have a
varying position on lots of different political standings
that I argue go back between left and
right because that's what most honest people have.
Opinions that seem to kind of end up
all over the place because the left and
right dynamic is a ridiculous illusion. And and
they've changed so much over the years that
they might as well be flip flopped at
this point. But they all just stand with
their team sport politics side.
But she says, you can hear them warning
about violence and saying Venezuelans want peace. And
that's why he's deleted, you understand? Because he
was wrong. And now he knows that, or
he got caught and wants to hide that.
Then she says the man in yellow hat
warns of the,
garambas
of the violent opposition,
Meaning, the side that the US government and
then and United States or rather and Israel
are supporting.
She says, I saw similar in 2019,
joined 1 motorcycle rally then to to hear
what they had to say. And she posted
right here. On March 30th, she joined 100
of members of a motorcycle
taxi union,
collectivo
during
the motorcycle
through and around Caracas in a show of
support for their country in defiance against foreign
intervention. Now they point they point to these
very kind of groups and act like they're
all socialist dictator, monster terrorists, or whatever their
hyperbolic stupid terms are. Like, sort of like
how Israel's like terror dungeons and rape factories.
Same thing. Where do you think this stuff
comes from? It says these were women and
men ask making a statement with their physical
presence, they would not allow their country to
be attacked from within or without.
Eva Bartlett was doing amazing work. She has
been for her entire career.
Now, this is what I find to be
the most important aspect of this. And this
is why in large one of the parts,
we the whole show today overlaps with it.
We started with the first part about the
2 party illusion.
Because if you're trapped in this right now,
and you're you're picking sides based on it,
you're being played.
Here's what's
important. Let me actually, let me play this
first. Here's what Blinken said. And remember, Blinken
is part of the US president Biden administration.
If, my colleagues will indulge me for just
one minute, I wanna speak quickly to the
elections that just took place in Venezuela.
We applaud the Venezuelan people for their participation
in the July 28 presidential election.
We commend their
And by the and remember that real quickly.
We're gonna go to what Kamala will say
in a minute. And they play this mid
you know, we commend the people for voting
or we we stand with the Venezuelan people.
Well, you could mean that in any way
you want. Meaning that we stand with what
we pretend they voted for,
which isn't Maduro.
Or we stand with what they actually voted
for, which is Maduro. By saying that, you
could go either way.
My point is, we'll get to in a
second, Kamala put out what seems to contradict
what everybody else in the administration is saying,
a statement that's being interpreted to say you
support Maduro.
But all it really says is we support
what the Venezuelans voted for, and that they're
what you're gonna find out is they're telling
you they voted for somebody other Maduro. But
it's being used so the the right can
say, see, the left supports Maduro. It's not
the reality, guys. The point I'm gonna get
to is right now, the right is supporting
the candidate that Biden's administration is endorsing.
While the narrative is something completely different because
they need you to think they're fighting the
bad Democrats, but the reality is they're all
supporting the same things.
And commitment to democracy
for their participation in the July 28 presidential
election.
We commend their courage
and commitment to democracy
in the face of repression
and in the face of adversity.
We've seen the announcement just a short while
ago by the Venezuelan electoral commission.
We have serious concerns
that the result announced
does not reflect the will
or the votes of
the Venezuelan people. Right. According to their people.
Right? Literally everybody else everybody else says the
opposite. Even parts of the opposition say the
opposite. Not the opposition they control, of course,
which is why that makes sense.
But they're talking about their individual groups that
they use to dictate like like a group
like the OAS.
But if you ask any of the international
observers or any of the groups that are
part of the local version of what they're
talking about, or even the one that aren't
part of that country, but not part of
the United States apparatus.
It's the groups that are there for this
very purpose to kind of, on a global
level, observe election. They're all saying it was
accurate.
We'll we'll get into more of this and
question it. Don't take my word for it.
I could certainly be wrong. The point is
that the evidence, as always, clearly goes against
what they're trying to tell you for their
own interests. Surprise, surprise.
It's critical that every vote be counted fairly
and transparently,
that election officials immediately share information with the
opposition
and independent observers without delay.
That's important. This is the same thing they
did with Bolivia.
There's a reason as we can show, it's
already been acknowledged, that these some time for
example, there's lots of rural rural areas
where there are things that take a minute
to end up coming through, and they then
immediately pounce on that and go, there, pause.
They're not letting any information to shut everything
down, and it comes out a little bit
later. And they just pretend that's what actually
happened.
So that's why he mentioned that. Because at
this point, they're saying most of them stood
up and said these things before it had
even finished.
Because they already knew the narrative. And I
already told you before, they were saying that
we're not I think it was, from Ecuador,
was saying we're not gonna abide by the
Gallaudetian results because they already saw the writing
on the wall. They already knew that the
Maduro was going to win. If their if
their person won, they would've been great. We
won. Good. That's the way it goes.
That's democracy for you. Right? But, of course,
coming out ahead of time before it even
the votes are even tallied and saying that
we won't abide by it, that's supposed to
be democracy. Like, this is the stupid nature
of if you wanna get into the left
right dynamic and it's trust me, it's the
government. It's not one side or the other.
But to get into it for a point,
it's like the left saying that, you know,
Trump's doing this except it's only it's all
he's breaking democracy, so we have to break
democracy to save democracy. It's just it's just
it's childlessly stupid. But, again, I argue that
that's the play to get you to think
that one versus the other in the end
game amounts the same. No matter what side
you're siding with, it amounts to them using
that to reimagine.
And that the electoral authorities publish the detailed
tabulation of votes.
The international community is watching this very closely
and will respond accordingly.
Yeah. They've already they've watched and they've already
told you it's all good. And you don't
agree with that, so you make things up.
This is what happens every single time. But
here's here's something funny. What happened to this
guy? Remember this
ridiculous person?
Juan Guaido?
Yeah. Isn't wasn't weren't we told incessantly that
he was the president? That he was the
rightful president? That never stopped. There's there's still
people that actually dumbly they stupidly say that.
So if he's actually the do we just
give up on that?
Where I that's not even part of the
conversation. Shouldn't that be relevant if you think
he's actually still what's because that was never
the case. That was how that's how embarrassing
this was when they just dropped him.
And even worse, when it got to a
point to where they actually needed oil for
Venezuela, and so they just made a deal
with Maduro and said, yeah, Guaido, sorry. We're
done with you. So what that shows you
is either, as always, like the point they
make with with,
was Somalia and others like that or Sudan,
excuse me, the Sudan.
In this case, it's that, well, okay. That
means either that you don't care that he's
actually the president because you need something from
Maduro, or he was never the president and
you are admitting that because you need something
from Maduro now. The Sudan's the point about
normalization.
Forever they've been saying they're a state sponsor
of terrorism.
But they said, hey. If you if you
normalize with Israel, we'll take you off the
list.
Nothing actually changed.
So again, the point is, they were either
never terrorists and they used that to coerce
them to join with Israel, or they just
didn't care they were terrorists because they joined
with Israel. It's so obvious if you just
think this stuff through.
This is what it's like to lie about
everything. Their own narratives trap them. So here's
mister Juan Guaido, the only president that's supposed
to exist and a threat to our democracy
if we don't do it. And now, wait,
we need something. Shut up. Go away.
It's embarrassing. It should be. Because these people
are ridiculous.
Where were we? I got lost in my
place.
Oh I guess that's where we're we're start
we're coming back to this. Let me close
some of these real quick. So the point
here
that I haven't even said yet, that I've
briefly mentioned. So everyone take note that the
right,
and I would argue the Republicans and the
Team Smart Politics side of this, have aligned
it themselves with the same candidate that the
Biden administration also backs in Venezuela,
despite the framing being exact opposite. Now how
do you make sense of that? If the
whole game is that we're fighting the socialist
bad guy and the Democrats are fighting to
impose socialism everywhere
except the Biden administration's backing
the other person, the person that you're backing,
that you prime is fighting socialism. And in
reality, if not even the best way to
describe what's going on there, There's definite overlaps.
My opinion isn't all bad. Government is bad
in my opinion. I think the socialism is
just the same as any other thing you
could talk about. It ultimately can be centralized
at the top. What do you think we're
living through right now?
That's what happens. It doesn't make the point
is that it's any level. It's government or
powerful people will always try to manipulate their
presence, their situation to benefit themselves.
The this narrative that it's only communism that
leads to some kind of problematic situation, it's
just it's a political narrative like everything else.
Frankly, I don't think it's any more likely
than anything else. That's my opinion. Just because
we've focused on these things historically, I also
think there's an overlap and this is not
prosocialism.
Again, I don't support that.
But my point is
that you can see there are levels of
these things that very clearly can
benefit their people.
As opposed to taking everything from them and
claiming you're doing things for them, which is
what your government does all over the world.
But it's just the same in reverse if
you wanna say they could put them in
that position and then put them like, this
is where you can get to the point
of starvation and the conversation of that, you
know, whether everyone's like a like a Soviet
Union kind of conversation. Right? The point is
that clearly, you can see how any of
these things could end up in those positions
if it's powerful people that choose to benefit
themselves instead of you. But you can also
look at positions
where sometimes it's more so to the one
side or more in the middle. Something like
Olivia, for example, where they were giving free
health care and free education, but there was
also plenty of problems.
But it had the highest quality of life
in all of Africa before they destroyed it
because they wanted what they wanted. Has nothing
to do with saving anybody.
My point is we gotta get away from
these childish, like, these naive perceptions that it's
the one thing they say.
The government is the one manipulating you, so
you do what they want. So my point
here is they're trying to pretend this is
the one good one, the one bad one.
They're all they're all supporting the same thing,
Hoping you don't pay attention.
Kindly, Acha points this out. And prior to
the results,
going underground was highlighting that the the, the
person that lost, Maria
Maria Corina Machado,
has said, if we win, well, we'll move
the Venezuelan Embassy to Jerusalem and support Israel.
There's a reason it's obvious what's going on
here, guys. Every US backed Latin American politician
tends to be fanatically pro Israel and pro
genocide in Gaza. Why do you think that
is? That's going underground.
That's the the name of the account, by
the way.
Here's another example. Here's Cat Turd saying, picture
of the election being stolen in Venezuela last
night. And it's that image that we've seen
from the dem the the election that are
claiming the democrats were hiding this and that,
which they were. So was the rep the
republicans, the democrats cheat every single time as
far back as I could look. That's the
reality.
We just like to be selective on what
we show because of partisan narratives.
My point
is that so this is supposed to be
you suggesting that the democrats
are somewhere you know, or at least that
what they're doing is the same as the
democrats. Okay. He says, oh, wait. That's the
Democrats stealing the election in 2020.
And I simply said, do you not realize
that you're backing the same Venezuelan candidate as
the Biden administration?
And it's funny how few people wanted to
comment on that.
Oops.
That's an uncomfortable reality. Right?
Well, here's Matt Miller saying the same thing.
Lincoln said today, it's critical that every vote
be fairly transparent. Oh, it already happened. It's
already over. Too late. They just they just
undermine what's happening like they've done every single
far Like we like, far back as you
can look, they've been doing this. Especially in
Venezuela.
And I under that comment where I said,
do you realize you're backing the same candidate?
Or re or, whatever that is however that's
pronounced says, the Biden admin is putting up
a front.
Ah, okay. Now it's it's the whole 40
chest dynamic. The peep which is certainly possible.
The people of Venezuela wanted Maria. That's not
true. I think it's easy to prove.
Or anything other than Maduro. Also, very shockingly
obvious to show.
That's why Maduro the the opposite is true.
That's why Maduro stealing the election will have
nothing happen to them from the Biden administration.
Right. Because the Biden administration is supposed to
be the one handing out,
what, accountability to people that are I guess,
the they're not the world police guy. It's
weird how you act like you're fighting against
the thing you claim there are, but then
endorse the idea that we're supposed to be
the ones sort of controlling what other countries
do.
The bottom line
that's not true no matter how you spin
it. I said, incorrect. That's a nice story
though designed to make you make sure you
don't reflect on the reality of what we're
saying right here, that you're backing the same
candidate. The idea that you just go, no.
We're not there. We're just lying about it.
Well, that's not true.
Look at what they're doing, their policy that
goes well back before the even Biden administration.
Your government supports the
anything but Maduro. They support whoever they put
in power that will interest them, that will
gain them what they want, socialist or otherwise.
That's the truth.
And so here's the interesting anomaly to this,
or at least how it's being presented.
Here's what Kamala Harris put out. This is
yesterday
at 5 PM.
The United States stands with the people of
Venezuela,
who expressed their voice in today's historic presidential
election.
The will of the Venezuelan people must be
respected.
Despite the many challenges, we will continue to
work toward a more democratic, prosperous, and secure
future for the people of Venezuela.
Well, yeah. That's right down that's a very
Trump style way. Right down the middle. Letting
everybody read into what they want it to
mean.
Very political.
But you get Elon Musk sharing what Gunther
says. The United States will become Venezuela if
Trump's not elected. You keep getting all these
ridiculous hyperbolic claims. Trump said that at the
Bitcoin conference, by the way, something to the
effect that if if we don't win, it
it'll be the end of this country. Like,
though, it's a very this is driving the
kinda civil war mindset. Especially, if you pretend
he's sent by God, you combine those things,
you are driving people to take action. Now
it's not just the right. It's the 2
party illusion,
but it is radicalizing people. That's not the
same as people out there challenging narratives. My
point is the actual level of these, and
I think conservatives and liberals are starting to
see it, are in fact very much driving
the very thing they're pointing at to justify
all of our suppression,
all of our censorship.
For you to come out and say that
that we have to stop this or this
is gonna happen, it's the mindset is people
that act irrationally.
It's the same as the left being calling
Trump Nazi or Hitler or whatever. You then
get them to put like, if you think
the assassination attempt was what it looks like,
that's what would happen. Somebody who convinces themselves
this is gonna save the world
because of false narratives.
So if he stands up and says, if
Iran assassinates me, he better flatten the country.
It's like these are dangerous things to say.
Or that if I don't win, that the
end of the country's gonna happen. That's dangerous
and irresponsible. And frankly, I don't agree with
that. I think they're all the same. I
think whoever gets elected, it was the plan
and you're all being manipulated by your government.
But I know that's not what everyone wants
to hear.
Well, he tag they tag the vice
Kamal Harris tweet,
saying that. So what they're insinuating is that,
well, she means that she's siding with Maduro.
And he says, I think the risk of
this is very real.
Oh, you added so much there. The point
is that, obviously, it's about trying to suggest
that they're supporting the opposite of what we
are, and they're fighting against the freedom and
liberty we're all trying to create. Okay. We'll
go back to what she said.
You could read that either way. The United
States stands with the people of Venezuela. Well,
you just heard Blinken say that that is
or in a number of elements other than
Blinken, like Rubio and everyone else we'll get
to. They're straight up saying that the people
don't want Maduro. We just heard that guy
say that. Why? Because he knows. No. Because
he's repeating what somebody on the right said.
They're not in Venezuela. They don't know. And
I'm not either.
But we have all sorts of people we
can connect with. We have research we can
show you. And maybe they do too. Look
into what his account says. The reality is,
when you actually dive into this, the evidence
is very clear. Very clear. And their track
record is also very clear. And we'll get
into that as well.
Of admitting that they knew what they did
before was gonna hurt people knowing that this
is regime change based on I mean, the
coup attempts. These are public. They used to
be conspiracy theory. So why are we gonna
pretend like only one side now is not
gonna do that? As I said in the
last show, the right is gonna make regime
change great again.
But what she's saying here is right down
the middle. Standing with people of Venezuela who
expressed
their voice. Well, to a lot of people,
that means for not Maduro.
I mark my words.
My prediction is that this will end up
coming becoming
we don't support Maduro.
It I mean, it's possible it can go
the other way. Things are weirdly changing right
now because, like, for instance,
pretending like you're against Israel, even though we
know they're not, they take APAC money and
so on. They would they might throw a
bone to some of the people in their
side
that think that they're that that that know
that genocide is being committed, and they they
think that they're trying to stop it. But
they're not really. So this may end up
where you kind of leave that and pretend
like you don't support the other guy and
just never talk about it again, but trust
me, if you actually look at their policy,
and I'll show you her other statements,
they don't support Maduro, guys? They support whatever
they need to to get what they want.
Here is just a couple of her past
statements. This is from 2019.
What's happening in Venezuela is a crisis. The
people who have fled Maduro's dictator dictatorial regime,
yeah, clearly, she supports him. Right? Deserve safety
and protection. As president, I would immediately extend
the Venezuela status. This is about immigration and
so on. It's all an agenda, guys. It
is all clear. Weaponized migration is a real
thing, but they're also causing it. So it's
not one side or the other. It's your
government doing this to manipulate you. Hey. Digital
IDs will solve it. Right? Here's what else.
She said this in 2019 as well. The
US must immediately condemn Maduro's violence against his
own people. Come on.
The reality is that they're all on the
same side.
I I I I'm gonna predict, but it's,
you know, it's it's not solid or certain,
I would say. But I'm gonna predict that
you're gonna find that this statement will end
up going the other way.
But by that point, it won't matter.
Now here is in that same conversation where
I said you're supporting the same as the
Biden administration.
This person said, I only care about which
one will make oil cheaper. That's great. But
it's our it's hard, he says, to look
at the election results, the graph, and not
think it's something very shady akin to 2020,
which, by the way, was exactly the point.
Part of the way you're being played. Because
they know you're thinking the same thing as
2020. Why? Because that's what keeps being put
in front of you by all these 1,000,000
follower accounts.
Think 2020. Think democrats. Think stolen election. And
then what do you know? Weirdly, that's what
you start to think. Just like Jones was
telling you. Maybe he was telling you exactly
what they always do. The bottom line
is that this is what they did in
Bolivia. So they they manipulate
graphs. They manipulate outcomes. They lie about the
circumstances, and they push in the midst of
something that you don't understand.
Here's some breakdowns on this that might explain
more. Manelo de Luz Santos says threat on
Venezuela election results.
The US government planned for Venezuela's election, and
this is just his opinion, take it for
what you will, all along was to generate
a fraud
and crisis
by creating false and unreliable exit polls to
deceive people and global public opinion
into thinking the far right opposition had a
40% lead.
Now just whether you think this is what
happened now, I don't know how anybody can
dis dispute that that's what they've already done.
I mean, even even people on the right
at this point are calling out based on
something I'll show you, the admissions, which I
think are designed sort of like a controlled
demolition point while hiding other facts.
Admitting that these past coups were to state
were just destructive,
and that they were coups, and they blah
blah blah. We're gonna show you.
But the point is that we know they've
done this. They know they've lied about the
outcome. They've pretended to deliver aid, and it
was really barbed wire and wood, so they
could then blame it on the other side.
That's what they do.
And that was during a Republican well, wait.
Well, what the
well, one of them was during Trump's administration,
for sure. That's 2020.
But it goes on to say, before the
polls even closed,
which by Venezuelan law only closed when the
last person online gets to vote,
US politicians and their Latin American allies started
demanding
vote results
be respected and prematurely declaring victory for the
far right opposition. And really quick to clarify.
My point in saying 2020, the tale basically,
Trump's administration came up and I'll play you
a quote from him saying the same. Where
that that
the agenda, the starvation campaign,
all through Trump's administration.
And then it tag teamed into Biden's, which
is the same thing that happens every time.
Just like COVID 19.
He goes on to say, as soon as
Venezuela actually Venezuela's actual election authorities announced the
first results, the opposition cried fraud without any
evidence or facts. Also, always what happens. This
is the same voting system that has allowed
for members of the opposition to win other
elections in recent years.
Venezuela has re has re
a record for over 20 years for having
one of the world's most transparent election systems.
That is the reality. You can look look
up outside of western apparatus media, that's pretty
commonly pointed out. Even people like,
what's his name? The, past president. Jimmy Carter.
I said some similar things.
It says the only one where 54% of
its votes are immediately audited.
Now the Western media, billionaires like Elon Musk
and the US government, all come together to
label Maduro a dictator.
These were free and fair elections with higher
voter turnout despite over a decade of cruel
US sanctions, higher turnout than we see in
this country, guys, that have crippled the Venezuelan
economy and sought to overthrow an elected government.
Nicolas Maduro has been reelected. The will of
the Venezuelan people has been respected.
Any claims of fraud in these elections must
be substantiated with actual evidence and facts, not
prefabricated
CA talking points. The people I've spoken for,
the revolution has won. The point,
that's what I think makes this make more
the standing.
What you're gonna hear from the like a
lot of the partisan narratives,
and right now you got the people like
Elon the right screaming,
dictator, they stole it.
Okay. Well, back it up. Where's your evidence
other than graphs and polls that you can
prove are inaccurate?
The point is that what he's saying is,
if you're gonna say this, then make put
up evidence. Instead of just coming out and
saying, that's not true. You're a liar. This
is what happened, which you get these forceful
statements from people within this conversation.
He's simply saying, look, where's the evidence? Let's
discuss this. That is what an objective person
does.
Now here is one of the examples of
the person. This is what he was talking
about.
So this was yesterday.
And this is according to and this was
one of these opposition, you know, in not
I argue not on the side of the
people of Venezuela.
Speaks they spoke up and from the opposition
parties and said, the National Electoral Council in
Venezuela has halted the transmission of vote count
data and is preventing opposition party witnesses from
accessing the voting records, removing them from polling
locations. Oh, nope. That was actually fake. Fake
video and the narrative was about a time
where they were waiting for other information which
later came.
This has been backed up by plenty of
people who are talking about it, but, of
course, they shoved this in the conversation before
things had ended. That's exactly what he's talking
about.
That's what they do.
And this person does the same thing. I'll
just put this here.
Don't don't forget about 2020. Don't forget about
the democrats in the election.
You're being socially engineered. Guys, you're being played.
Marco Rubio
steps into the conversation.
And says after announcing a complete fraud of
the election,
this is late yesterday,
except the Maduro regime will now begin to
black oh, no. He goes again, this is
important. After announcing a complete fraud, the election,
expect the Maduro regime will now begin to
black out the Internet inside Venezuela to make
it difficult for those inside to communicate with
each other and the world.
You should remember that because he's almost verbatim
said that before.
Before that, here's what gen, ex girl says,
rinse and repeat.
Bolivia. Hey, Marco.
Here's fast grid. The same thing. Same thing.
Here's physical guy 24. The Maduro regime stops
counting the votes. The web page of the
national like, this is the same things they
put out. The same narrative that are you
can look back now are flimsy, false, or
misinformation
that later
like the point would be, like we'll show
you in a second,
pulling other data from places that take them
in
and then ends up following up later. Now
of course, question that. Look into it. If
you think they lied, you think they're cheating,
find the evidence for it. Having a pause
in this while all the things are happening,
which is what's happened in in Bolivia, for
example, They lied about it. And we now
know for a fact, based on things like
an m I a MIT study that proved
they lied about it,
that they did manipulate the Bolivian election.
This is the point. Let's go back to,
well, this just says that's what the OAS
Lima group said about the Bolivian vote count
as they were awaiting votes from distant rural
areas. That was just before the US coup
stepped in and the violence was wrought on
the population.
That's what they do, guys.
The point is don't forget, she's citing something
that was already proven to be false.
Because that's what you do.
Now here,
and we're gonna get into the rubo Rubio
part. Actually, I thought this was,
Shoot. I guess it's way down here actually.
We're gonna come back to that. Don't remember
that point about the, internet being turned off.
Because he said this before. The point is
that you're already seeing that now. And he
did the same thing in 2019, and it
happened literally the same time he said that.
Now, of course, you could argue that's just
what they're doing, but it's pretty conspicuous
to say, he's about to do the thing.
And then Maduro goes, oh, okay, and does
the thing. Like, that just seemed pretty stupid.
But Casey Wright coming into the today conversation,
Nicolas Maduro has officially been named the winner
of the Venezuelan presidential election.
Now lots of these countries have refused to
recognize the results officially,
and then even more though have officially recognized
the results. 51% to 44% was the final.
Alan McLeod highlights what the New York Times
is saying. Venezuela's autocrat is declared winner in
tainted election. Yeah. Very but very unbiased. Like,
it's just so obvious that they have a
mandate.
He says the reason elections in Venezuela are,
quote, tainted is because the, quote, wrong person
won,
beating the US backed candidate, which is what
you see everywhere.
And it's not left or right candidate, guys.
It's the US government candidate. The US has
had, quote, serious concerns with every Chavista victory
since the year 2000. Why should we care
what a country that has supported many coups
against this country think? Or the ongoing supporting
of genocide, like, they don't have any moral
standing anywhere?
Rania Collect says this is a lie. The
New York Times is lying to cast doubt
on the election of a socialist leader they
do not like. Over 800 international election observers
across Venezuela saw a transparent and efficient process.
Over 800
international election observers. You realize how many I
mean, we're talking about people from different countries,
from different backgrounds, from different political standings, who
are all independently there observing, and 800
of them.
Not irregularities as the New York Times says.
They saw a transparent and efficient process. Even
voters in opposition areas, as I've mentioned earlier,
have expressed satisfaction with the process,
just not the specific opposition that the US
government is backing and Israel's backing. I wonder
why.
Fiorella Isabelle
breaks down. I'm not gonna go through this
now. The it's about but this in case
you wanna go through this, she very specifically
and technologically breaks down the process of what
they use in these elections.
As Pasta would say, this is exactly what
we should be doing versus the digital ID
direction they're taking you in. Which is what
they're pushing based on illegal voting and all.
We should be going paper ballots and in
in what ballot to ballot
confirmation.
At the minute, it's right now, there's obvious
ways they're cheating this. And, I mean, as
pastor spoken to himself, where you can go
to these places in other countries that have,
you know, less to some degree, less population.
But you they see these things get finished,
counted, verified one day.
We're we're we're getting weeks months sometimes. It's
embarrassing and it's meant to manipulate.
And it's designed so they can all cheat
and manipulate the process. And I don't mean
the voting guy because I you know my
opinion on that. It is about a lot
of other things happening. And you could even
argue maybe I'm wrong in the case of
different levels of voting, the lower vote. I
argue from local levels. If anything's to have
an effect, that would be the case. But,
again, I always get pulled into that. We'll
talk about that much more
probably right around when this is beginning to
happen.
But she says before calling fraud of Venezuela's
elections, read this. I've covered elections in the
US, in Latin America, Russia. This can be
a bit techy, but I'll explain the electoral
process step by step. It's important to know
if you wanna go through this to understand
the process.
Now here is from Zero Hedge. Maduro declared
Venezuelan president for 3rd term, but opposition claims
victory is stolen,
Just like we're gonna see in this country
as soon as this happens. Venezuela's opposition claims,
Gonzales defeated
president Nicolas Maduro in Sunday's presidential presidential election,
setting up a showdown with the government which
earlier declared Maduro the winner.
Now, apparently, she the Machado
was like the stand in for him. It's
it's weird.
Everything about what they do seems manipulated, to
my opinion. But, ultimately, it says some regional
and external governments have signaled that they will
not recognize Maduro's win.
All eyes will also be on Washington, Monday,
waiting to see how forcefully the US administration
condemns the outcome.
Why does that make sense? Meanwhile, an interesting
recent administration in Revelation, what Aronate points out.
But
it's like everyone just can't stop acknowledging that
we're it's okay that you think that they're
somehow the policeman of the world. Why does
the US have any say in any of
this? It's a good question, isn't it? But
here's what Aaron Motte pointed out. This is
very important. This is what we've been highlighting
around this conversation for as far back as
you could look. It's not just John Bolton,
by the way. But they do not care
about the people that they claim they're trying
to do this to benefit.
He writes, ahead of Venezuela's election,
John Bolton admitted to the Washington Post that
he knew that the Trump administration's crippling sanctions
and coup attempt
against Venezuela would destroy its economy and force
millions to flee. You know, all the millions
they later used, the migration can the the
caravan.
Yeah. Well, we told you then, and you
probably still won't wanna hear it despite Bolton
admitting it, that that was manufactured.
By the very people you claim were trying
to stop the Democrats from doing it. Oops.
The point is, all of them are doing
it, but this was the administration that you
claim was trying to fight against that. The
point is it says there was no doubt
the sanctions along with the general economic debt
deterioration
before we imposed them. Meaning, he's also admitting
that it wasn't
Venezuela's fault they were starving and suffering. They
made this happen, which again, anybody with a
brain could see that.
And all the lies they spun.
Eating the zoo animals and all these things.
That was lie. It was a proven lie.
Abby Martin was the one that broke that
down, showing that the people that were stealing
some of these things were small, expensive animals
that they were selling on selling overseas. Had
nothing to do with stealing animals to eat
them because they were starving.
They were in those positions because the US
government was starving all of them. And then
they manufactured all these lies to try to
convince you that it was because Maduro was
doing it.
But it says they were driving a lot
of people out of the country. He says
that to me was a way to put
pressure on the country. So you don't care
about Venezuelans if what you're doing is hurting
Venezuelans to pressure Maduro, which by the way,
that's what sanctions are designed to do.
Hurt average people so they force their government
to take action.
If you don't think that, look back at
our history. They've written this stuff down. So
right now, when they sanction
anybody,
in the sense of where it's affecting the
average people, they know what they're doing.
People like that should not even be allowed
to have this statement of somehow acting in
the interest of freedom or human rights when
all they do is stand all over those
things. They ruin they
they
use them against people.
He says, did any Venezuelans vote for John
Bolton? Aaron writes, Donald Trump or Joe Biden,
who initially continued the Trump policy to destroy
their economy? Does Trump, who constantly rails against
undocumented immigrants, ever take responsibility for knowingly creating
millions of them? It's a good question, isn't
it? I'm sure the right will ignore it.
Those are those are pertinent questions as we
address the sincerity and credibility of bipartisan US
establishment figures. Who will
now question Venezuela's election and denounce Maduro as
an autocrat. To me, he says, there's nothing
more autocratic than trying to a foreign country
and install a new government there.
Again, if you're hearing this as a partisan
narrative, it's not.
Both sides of your government or all of
your government are the ones responsible for this.
And they use these partisan narratives to keep
you fighting each other.
Here is what Megatron posted
of of senator Chris Murphy. Now, in this
statement, I think this is meant to be
a sort of controlled demolition where you're admitting
very dangerous things about what's happened before in
a way to make Murphy seem like he's
standing out as the truth teller, but he's
also telling you a lot of lies in
here.
For example, arguing they were bringing in human
entering ape. They were not. They were caught
with empty trucks full of barbed wire, and
they were trying to throw Molotov cocktails out
there to blame Maduro, and it got in
in real time exposed as being doing it,
which meant the US government and Israel. But
here,
our important statements nonetheless,
he says, we tried to construct a coup
in Venezuela. That was supposed to be a
fake story. That was supposed to be conspiracy
theory. We got censored back then for talking
about stuff like this.
I feel like it's Groundhog Day in this
committee. We've been told by the administration,
frankly, multiple administrations for years that
Russia's support for Assad and Iran's support support
for Assad is tepid. It's fragile. It's just
a matter of time before he falls. Is
they were always willing to do more than
we were in Syria to protect their interests.
And that is likely the exact same case
here in Venezuela. And so our policy has
been
misguided by fundamentally flawed assumptions from the beginning.
And I have deep respect for both of
you, who are testifying before this committee.
But we just have to be clear that
our Venezuela policy over the last year and
a half has been an unmitigated disaster. And
if we aren't honest about that, then we
can't self correct.
We have to admit that our big play
recognizing Guaido right out of the gate and
then moving quickly to implement sanctions just didn't
work. It didn't. All it did was
Yeah. And it was also shockingly legal.
That's the point.
Recognizing Guaido for in in what standing?
And how in the world is unilaterally recognizing
someone who doesn't even have position to be
there
democracy?
Like, so just make sure you're recognizing how
ridiculous this is and realize that it's and
he's not addressing any of that, that they
do this all the time. And now this
is trying to use a little bit of
this to open you to make you think
that you're getting in for
they're using this to trap you in the
next thing. The only time, in my opinion,
you get this kind of information from the
government is when they're using it to pull
you into something new.
Just recognize that. They lied to you about
what they did. They destroyed this country, and
they've and that's why people support Maduro,
because they know what is going on. And
most of the world does today. It's wildly
transparent. You know who are the least un
least informed
about what the US government is doing? People
trapped in the 2 party illusion. The world
seems to know more than anybody else
because they're living through it. Harden
Russia and Cuba's play in Venezuela and allow
Maduro to paint Guaido as an American patsy.
Because he was. I mean, you literally just
said that you plucked him out of obscurity
and made him the president. But they but
they painted him as a patsy.
He is, guys. That's what he is. And
that's that's why he was just as easily
dropped.
If he was the real thing, you guys
would be talking about him as supposed to
be in power.
And a lot of us warn that this
might happen.
We could have used the prospect of US
recognition
or sanctions as leverage. We could have spent
more time trying to get European allies and
other partners on the same page. We could
have spent more time trying to
talk to or neutralize China and Russia early
before we back them into a corner. A
corner Think about what we're even talking about
in some kind of casual way, like you're
doing the right thing. You know, you're given
you're the measured,
you know,
measured response. You're talking about illegal actions. You're
talking about coercive movements by saying we'll we'll
threaten sanctions and threaten act that's what he's
talking about.
In order to get what you want, is
that democracy? Are any of those things amounting
to what the Venezuelan people want? You're talking
about going as China and Russia. What does
it have to do with Venezuelan people? I
understand that those countries also have interest in
a lot of stuff that's going on there.
But
I'm not aware of any regime change efforts
or occupation or any efforts like we've seen
in every other country you've done. They're making
deals with Venezuela. Sure. I guarantee they're in
the interest of themselves more than anybody else,
but it's being done by choice.
And, yes, I know that threatens your US
preeminence and the idea that you need to
constantly be battling for who controls the world.
That's not what anybody else wants from you.
That's what you guys want for yourselves.
So painting it like this is grotesque.
You're painting it like you're somehow good do
gooder out there trying to save the situation
when all you're highlighting is illegal action. From
which they are not moving. They are not
moving.
But all we did was play all our
cards on day 1, and it didn't work.
Yeah. The typical belligerent response from just Trump
or Biden, this is your government,
coming out with immediate
flat I mean, you know, realistically, all the
things we've heard about the Soviet Union in
the past, you know, that they have to
show demonstrate strength, And it's all about that.
That's what this government is today. In in
that one sense, but a lot of those
as well. We have to think about what
that shows if you look back. I I've
said this so many times. How is it
even possible that we can look at all
of the supposed regime change for benefit for
democracy?
They're batting 0, guys. They have destroyed
every single country they claimed they were liberating.
What'd they say about Iraq? They'd welcome us
as liberating heroes? Yeah. That didn't work. It's
destroyed.
Syria. Afghanistan.
Bolivia, Libya.
Venezuela is not occupied, but sure as hell
being destroyed. Guys, this is what they do.
And my point is, that's not the accident.
That's the point.
But let's keep letting them try because they're
clearly good guys. Right? And it's just been
an embarrassing mistake after mistake since.
First, we thought that getting Guaido to declare
himself president would be enough to tell To
declare himself president.
This is so stupid. Double regime.
Then we thought putting aid on the border
would be enough. Yeah. You mean the barbed
wire and wood that you pretended was aid
so you could
create a false flag and fail to blame
it on Maduro? Then we tried to sort
of construct a kind of coup in April
of last year, and it blew up in
our face when all the generals that were
supposed to break with Maduro decided to stick
with him in the end. Yep. And that
was a really embarrassing one because remember we
talked about that. That's showing you how inept
inept they were. Like, they got played. And
sort of like we saw with Russia, Ukraine,
the same they they don't have the influence
they pretend they do. They still have a
hell of a lot of influence, but my
point is they've lost the ability. Like, we
we watched that play out where they basically
allowed us to go forward. They played the
US government. They thought they were gonna take
over, and all of a sudden, the generals
just stayed with my with Maduro.
You just admitted openly to carrying out an
illegal coup,
attempted a coup. That's a crime, guys. It
just because it happens all the time doesn't
mean it's not a very clear international crime.
They don't care.
They're doing it again.
We undermined Norway's
talks last summer. And then this March, we
released a transition framework that frankly is almost
a carbon copy of the very one that
was in front of the parties
last
year. Right. That's all he's saying is even
though all of that, even though destruction, terror,
incompetence,
failure
Here, let's do it again. Same thing. Propose
the same you know why? Because despite all
of those terrible words he just listed off
or the what I'm saying he's saying, which
is what he's saying, but I put specific
words on it.
Despite all of that, despite him framing it
as a failure,
they made a hell of a lot of
money. Sailing weapons,
and I mean, any number of other things.
Legislation that was passed because of the threat,
the migration. I mean, that's what these things
ultimately come down to. Yes. There was an
agenda about actually taking control of Venezuela.
But within all of that,
every they they they're just gonna go through
the motions again.
That's what's happening. And he just straight up
told you that.
Sorta like revelation of the method or any
number of things you could argue. They're just
telling you what's happening.
Now here's Marco Rubio, and that's what I
was showing you earlier.
Saying that get ready for Maduro to turn
off the Internet.
Well, here's why this is ridiculous.
And Marco Rubio is always one of the
first people screaming about Venezuela.
I said, gee, I wonder if this prescient
prediction that he that I I wonder if
after this prescient prediction he might, you know,
take action to take down their internet and
then blame it on Maduro. What do you
think? Which is exactly what happened during the
last coup attempt. These people just seem to
repeat the same few plays
over and over.
Well, guess what? Casey Wright saw the same
thing. Marco Rubio could have copied and pasted
his tweet from 2,019.
The only difference is getting a ton more
reach in 2024.
It actually looks like he was being shadow
banned in 2,019, but he's being amplified today.
Here's 2019.
Tomorrow in Venezuela, expect Maduro to cut off
the Internet. This is January 22nd.
Well, guess what happened?
In January
2019,
various social media sites suffered brief blackouts in
Venezuela. A few points, the Internet went down.
And what'd they do? They said, Maduro shutting
it down. That's not what happened.
This this retroactively, you can see they they
made this happen. They attacked them. They suppressed
them. They and the finance even just in
in one sense, just the financial sanctions
caused some of this to happen. The point
is, it's wildly
for this to for him to point at
it, and then that made the same thing
happen.
Yeah. Well, he must be psychic or something.
Right?
Here, this is the article from 2019.
All the countries that were somehow managed to
shut down their entire Internet. Right. Because it
was their fault. Right? Or they did it.
No. It's the same thing happening again. And
now, here he does it again.
Get ready for the internet to go down.
And then what do you know?
Oops. Internet starts to go down in Venezuela.
The next day?
Like, it's like they can't at least he
waited a few days last time. Right now,
the very next day.
Despite all the evidence showing the opposite, they
are trying to manufacture
the illusion to make it look like they're
okay. Now here's what's gonna happen. They're gonna
say that the the Internet went down. Now
they changed everything. They altered all the results
and now we can't see. Well, guess what?
We're not dealing with a digital election like
we deal with in this country. But that
narrative is gonna be out there. Mark my
words.
Either way, they're manufacturing the setup to make
it look like they're trying to steal something
because they're desperate to take control of this.
And the lithium. And the oil. And the
gold. And everything else.
Dan Cohen discusses Matt Gaetz.
Matt Gaetz says, what is happening in Venezuela
right now could be historic. It must teach
us a lesson among many. You can typically
vote you can typically vote your way into
socialism,
but you have to fight your way out.
See how this works? Only about the one
thing they're highlighting because it catches the attention
of the conservative or rather the republicans that
are blinded by this and nothing else and
driving you into the idea that now they
need to fight their way out.
It was an election observed by 800 plus
international observers who have confirmed that it's legitimate.
And it's obvious to anybody with a brain
and eyes that most people support Maduro in
that country. The guy walks around in places
publicly without any could grudge people sweep. It's
crazy. You have never
seen a US politician do any of the
things you see people like Assad or Maduro
do. That's not to say that that proves
what we're talking about. But I'm telling you
right now, they wouldn't even pretend to do
that.
These these people are so terrified of us
that they hide behind big walls and bore
and metal fences and then keep you with
people at for distance with secure secret service
because they know you hate them.
Here's what Dan said. Today, Matt Gaetz is
trying to destabilize Venezuela.
Tomorrow, he'll complain there's a Venezuelan migration crisis
on our border. See how that works? Just
like before, when they John Bolton admits that
they knew what they was gonna they would
do what is gonna drive
massive people out of their country, and then
they turned around and said, see,
this is what they're doing. This is the
fault of the Democrats or whatever. Whatever the
point is the moment
to get you divided.
He says he's either he's either too dense
to understand
cause and effect or he's doing it intentionally.
I'm I would argue the latter. Let Venezuela
choose its own path and stop interfering with
its sovereign democratic process.
If that processes. If Venezuela is allowed to
prosper instead of suffocate under sanctions, the migration
flow will naturally reverse. That's quite obvious.
But it's too it's too much of a
wedge issue now.
So they're using human lives just like we
see over and over and over. And it
will materialize with
biometric checkpoints, digital IDs,
possibly even vaccine passports.
And don't say you don't I I won't
I mean, I probably will, but I would
say I won't say I told you so
when it happens.
Hopefully, there's enough conservatives out there who are
open minded enough to see this. Or liberals
for that matter. But this is right now,
I this whole thing I feel is being
aimed specifically at the Republicans.
Now here is is it it's a thread
from the poll lady. I just wanna make
sure you saw this. Don't forget that this
is what Trump said.
All these people that kept screaming about continue
to scream about how he never started new
wars, which is just a manipulation.
Clearly, as he even said in a recent
speech at the Bitcoin conference that he finished
them all Like, that's any better. It's ridiculous
to even say that like it's a proud
moment. But the re and and by the
way, he didn't. Because they're most of them
are still happening. Even Afghanistan, there's still people
on the ground despite all the lies. The
point
is
that Soleimani being assassinated
obviously could've spun out into a massive war.
It just didn't. It was a massive war
crime.
But what he did in Venezuela
just as easily could've become a massive war.
And here is what he said, which means
it shows you that
they wouldn't have been averse to that.
But buying oil from Venezuela.
When I left, Venezuela was ready to collapse.
We would have taken it over. We would
have gotten all that oil. It would have
been right next door.
But now we're buying oil from Venezuela. So
we're making a dictator very rich. Can you
believe this? Nobody can believe it. You know
when the well, you know, their oil is
garbage. It's horrible. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, they got
the bad oil.
This is so stupid. But the point is
ultimately,
he's admitting this. That we should've just taken
it. Like we said, with Sewer, it's gonna
go in Syria and take the oil. Those
are crimes, guys. No matter how you spin
this. Those are crimes. Even if Maduro's actually
a dictator. It's still a crime. It is
still a crime to just occupy and destabilize
and say you can just steal their resources.
It's just so on the surface today. And
the sad part is a lot of people
trapped in the paradigm are just choosing not
to care.
Again, that's Team Short politics. They're just like,
shut up. You're you woke softy. We only
care about oil and freedom and beer and
meat or whatever the dumb thing to say
over here. It's only about the extreme opposite.
Right? Where over here, we care, like, to
to the point where everyone has to get
what they want, and everybody can choose their
gender, and every all these they're both ridiculous
cartoons of what we should be.
That's the point. It's always happening. But just
listen to him when he tells you what
he's actually what he is, what all of
them are.
Now, I'm gonna include these for you to
read.
This is this was actually when when we
were you were, were at the time posting
a lot of other people's work through Creative
Commons. This was from antiwar.com, which by the
way, I I I just can't shout them
out enough. I was just sharing some of
the articles again yesterday or today. Amazing work.
This one was Jason Ditz. Venezuela's Guaido seeks
military aid for regime change. That was from
Whitney Webb. Oh, no. This was Jason. That
was Jason. Excuse me. This one. I just
said that. This one is, here from Whitney.
I'll get to it in a second, actually.
So this is an important article telling you
Guaido, just like Macharo's doing,
Israel, we need regime change. We need every
well, same thing. He's reaching out to everybody
else saying, help us, regime change.
Nothing's new under the sun. Guys, here
is Mike Pompeo, 2,019.
Says regime change is also planned for Nicaragua
and Cuba. Not only Venezuela. He actually said
that.
It's gonna be great again. Don't worry. Republicans
are gonna make regime change great again. And
by the way, it's not a unique left
right thing. The left is doing just as
much. The point is right now, it's a
different time. There's different focuses. Where, you know,
with with the ongoing genocide, it's a little
bit difficult to get away with regime change,
I would argue. The point is that it
go if you look back through history, it's
not unique to one side or the other.
It surges in different points at different times.
It's obvious at different times. But, something like
Afghanistan or Vietnam, they go through 4 to
multiple generations,
left and right. It's always the same thing.
I don't know how much more I can
hammer that on.
2020,
A massive COVID 19 cover up is underway
and US mercenaries caught in Venezuelan coup attempt.
They they remember this story? Sort of like
we saw in Iran or in China or
everywhere else they're doing the same thing. They
got caught. Nothing happened to them, of course,
because they're on, you know, in they act
with impunity around the world.
Here, this one's written by Whitney Webb.
2020. Driven by the dramatic collapse of US
shale, the Trump administration takes aim at Venezuela.
Same thing's gonna happen again.
Now, last few points on this. Anya Parental
points this out.
Don't turn off your critical thinking skills just
because you have been told Venezuela is socialist
your whole life. The Venezuelan opposition have claimed
fraud and contested virtually every election that they
have lost since Chavez came to power. Yet,
they can never provide evidence. And that is
because Venezuela's electoral process is far more secure,
don't freak out now, than what we have
in the United States. Frankly, I agree with
that. It's not about Venezuela. It's about the
fact that what we deal with here is
ridiculous.
And it's a growing reality that people are
coming coming becoming aware of. Whether it's the
voting machines or just the straight up dis
every side is constantly cheating. They're, it's my
point is, I don't even think your vote
has any effect on the outcome.
I 100% believe that.
But whatever you think about Venezuela, realize that
what we're dealing with as people like pasta
have highlighted is a system that's pretty easy
to maintain.
One person, one vote, paper ballots, checks, ballots.
It's one day process.
Obviously, anybody can cheat in any situation, but
the reality seems to be this is more
secure.
That's why a lot of people in this
country are go asking you to go back
to paper ballots. But it says I did
she said I described the voting process in
the country which I have observed firsthand in
my book. That's what she's saying. And the
point is, you could question her motive. Do
of course, question everybody. But these are people
that have been there, that have watched it,
that have researched it, not like people screaming
about what they you know, they're experts on
what the US government says about these things.
That's most of the intelligence conversation. And she
says, quote, in Venezuela for her book, voting
machines were activated through a 2 step verification
process. That's what and Isabella was breaking down.
Consisting of a physical check of the voters'
national identity card and a digital scan of
their fingerprint, which I don't want and I
don't agree with. Just to be clear. Right?
I'm not suggesting that we should do any
of these things. I think I should go
the other direction.
But from a static point, my the point
is that these things are clearly more secure
than what we're dealing with here. I want
something different. I don't want any technological,
biometric overlap for any of this stuff. I
don't know why anybody would, quite frankly.
It says after casting their vote, the voter
received a physical receipt of their ballot, which
they then personally dropped in a secure box
on the site. I think you got my
point. That's clearly more secure.
What this is the way all this works
usually. My point is that you end up
pointing at one thing and then the the
assumption becomes you support all of these different
things. You know, there's nuance in all of
this stuff. It is possible to be able
to highlight certain things without and and and
being opposed to others.
But it says the voter then sign their
name on the stamped their thumbprint on a
physical electoral registry to certify their participation. When
the polls close, authorities
assigned fee, assuaged fears of digital vote tampering
by checking their final electronic tally against the
random sampling of 54% of the physical ballot.
Citizen and inter international observers are present throughout
the process. Do not fall for claims of
fraud unless hard evidence is produced, especially because
further escalation of Venezuela will only result in
civil conflict and perhaps even regional war in
the Western Hemisphere. And what will that do?
Drive massive migration into the United States, which
they probably want, and they'll use to usher
in everything we're talking about.
It says, you think our border looks bad
now? Wait until Washington turns up the heat
on Caracas, Venezuela.
Oh, she says, and the Russian military has
strong military ties with Venezuela
and a presence within the country. We are
not only talking about a regional war here,
but an expansion
of the world war currently raging against Russia
and its allied rising powers. Are you ready
for that war to hit Washington's backyard?
I don't think anybody is. I don't think
the US government does. One more point, she
says, the vast majority of Venezuela's economy, hotels,
restaurants, stores, are privately owned and operated.
This sort of challenges this idea of what
they claim this country is. Not entirely, because
I'm not denying it in any way that
this is socialist country, but that's their party.
My point is that it's weird how that
if you actually break down these things and
compare it to, let's just say, the United
States. It's a interesting, the differences and the
similarities.
But it says,
Venezuela's
socialism is largely defined by the fact its
industries, including its oil sector and precious minerals
reserves are nationally operated.
This makes Venezuela comparable to Russia and many
other modern states that consider the natural resources
stored within a nation to be the property
of the
republic rather than a few at the top.
Now who would disagree with that?
My point is is the same, and this
is what's gonna get taken out of context
by people that want to be dishonest. But
the point is
that in any situation, whether it's democracy, authoritarianism,
so socialism, communism, is that anybody who has
dishonest intentions can manipulate
I make that point about a like a
a a monarchy.
Like, I mean, if you wanna be real
about it, like, in a sense that what
might be the best benefit for the average
person, and I'm not advocating for this.
So let's just say, hypothetically, you had a
a king or a queen
who, for sake of conversation,
genuinely
only wanted what's best for the people at
the expense of themselves. Truly, which is a
a unicorn. It doesn't exist. But let's just
say that was the case. Wouldn't that be,
like, the best case scenario?
That person takes control of everything and they
act in every way in the interest of
you at their expense? Well, yes. But that's
never gonna happen.
Listen, because the reality is even if it
was, the next person won't be the same.
My point in saying that is it doesn't
matter what you look at, top down, whatever.
The point is with good intentions and the
people truly acting it to the people in
the interest of the people, well, then that
would be a positive thing with varying degrees
of what you think is better or worse.
My point in saying all that is if
you really think about this in the sense
of not the entire idea of socialist governments
and governance and, you you know, food, credits,
and all the stuff that they scaremonger about,
which are real things in the past. What
we're talking about here
is the idea of taking the assets of
the country, which by the way is what
the US government is aiming at,
what they'll take immediately
for their expense at the expense of the
people of Venezuela, you know, the exact opposite
of what we're talking about, and they claim,
they could be lying about it, they could
abuse it like any other form of governance,
create a situation where those resources are used
to benefit the people. And this is what
we talked about in regard to Libya,
and the idea of free health care and
free college, and one of the reasons why
he was beginning to aim towards a gold
backed dinar, which is one of the reasons
I argue, one of the reasons that this
was take he was taken out.
But if you think that that's possible, and
you have somebody who genuinely wants to I
mean, I I would argue you could just
easily do that and then also still
completely benefit yourself at the expense of the
people. Both can exist. Either way, as an
average person,
what would you want?
Would Would you wanna live in a place
where we're dealing with what we're dealing with
in this country? Lies, 2 party illusion systems,
complete, you know, mass warp speed operations, forced
injections,
you know, the illusion of what we pretend
we have or a place that's the exact
opposite and, you know, dark the worst situations
or somewhere where it's, you know, there's bad,
there's good, but ultimately, you have access to
things like this. And there is a level
of inter and you get where I'm going
with this. I don't support government.
I know after saying all of that, it's
hard to wrap your mind around, but I
don't. I think government is the problem.
But we're way far away from that conversation.
I don't think anybody most people don't even
agree with that. We're still with the, well,
who's gonna build the roads conversation? Corbett and
I always laugh about. Yeah. We will. The
same people that do now. The government is
not the one doing. The government is simply
pointing in your direction, and we do it.
My point, though, is that I genuinely think
that we can get to a point where
we can understand that government can top down
control in any sense is the problem.
But since we're staring at these things and
we're comparing, I argue that we're talking about
something where if this is the reality and
can be maintained and checked and balanced, whatever
else, that, yes, obviously.
This is like saying Americans should benefit from
all the sale of, you know, all of
the resources we have in that country, which
is not what happens.
Wouldn't you want that? Wouldn't you want to
be able to have free healthcare and free
college and whatever else? Yeah. I think most
people would. And that would be deemed socialism
by the people that bastard you know, that
screamed about everything that's not what they think
we should have.
The point comes down to the fact is
that we shouldn't be talking about this at
all.
Americans, our government, should have no say over
what Venezuelans
want
or vote for.
Not just because they wanna say that this
is a bro fraudulent election. You know, maybe
it was. It's still not the US government's
place to stick their fingers in and say,
now we have to pick who's gonna be
in charge because we're totally not the policeman
of the world is what they always love
to pretend.
We don't wanna dictate this and that except
we'll do that every chance we get.
That's what they are.
And guess what? They're not doing it for
the interest of Venezuelan people. And she goes
on to say, Venezuela is an obsession in
Washington because before Chavez, US and European companies
practically owned the country, and the IMF set
its domestic economic economic agenda.
Venezuela is home to the largest oil and
untapped gold reserves in the world.
This is and lithium, as we showed you,
this is why Americans have been inundated with
propaganda about Venezuela since it began the process
of asserting sovereignty,
sovereign ownership over that natural wealth.
Like any one of these countries, the moment
they start saying, hey. Why don't we benefit
from this? Ask any African country. And that
goes back way before the US government, guys.
It goes back to Britain
colonial settle taking these countries and benefiting from
their resources at the expense of the people.
I think this was a clip that we
played,
Jeffrey Sachs made this point. The idea simply
being that when they do this,
they force these countries to begin producing things
that are what the US government needs. They
force them to be reliant on things the
US government then gives them, which in most
cases are things they could produce for themselves.
And they get in a situation where should
the US government want to, they can simply
turn off the tap.
Now you're screwed. You have to get what
you need from them. Otherwise, your country collapses
and they blame it on you. And all
you're doing is producing things that the government
needs for things outside of their country. And
you slowly dwindle into poverty,
which just makes it easier to control,
this is what we're dealing with, guys.
She says, this is why Americans have been
inundated with this propaganda.
That that is what their socialist
socialism in quotes is primarily about.
Now my I I know that people that
are blinded by the 2 party illusion, they
they they stopped listening when the word socialism
was lit was discussed. They're done. Because they're
blinded by the propaganda.
But and this is what Casey Wright said,
and this this is where that point came
from my mind.
He says and this is responding to Kath
Durden and the rest of them calling this
out as social. And he says, does he
realize that only approximately 28%
of the Venezuelan economy is ran by the
government?
You can look this up. And 72%
is private sector. That's and this is the
point, that in that 28, it's specific it's
it's the natural resources.
The rest of it is private sector for
the most part. She and then then he
says the US government, by the way,
is 85% private sector and 15% government.
So, the 13% difference makes Venezuela communist or
whatever?
Venezuela has the same roughly percent rough percentage
as Germany.
But weird how we don't talk about that.
It's just subjective and manipulated.
There's issues with all these places. But to
pretend that it's only because of this one
thing that you're supposed to hate because they
taught you to,
you're being played.
Here's end wokeness making that point for me.
Saying exit polls
from the Wall Street Journal. You know, that
conservative platform. Right? Opposition leader, 65%. Socialist dictator,
Maduro, 31%.
Break, you know, whatever we're supposed to believe
from these polls. No leader or media organization
should legitimize this fake election.
Think about these people. What why does end
wokeness think they have any insight on what's
going on? Because Elon said. Because our our
the the the the current
drive from this side of our paradigm is
all about what that's supposed to be fake.
Maduro bad. Communism social is bad.
Well, guess what?
John Jackman makes this perfect point perfectly well.
He says, I am anti woke. Oh, and
here's some BS poll from the Wall Street
Journal. I believe uncritically.
Think of how stupid that is. This is
these are the same people that in in
in COVID 19 conversation would go, oh, you're
gonna give me a Wall Street Journal article?
You're ridiculous. They're so blinded by Oh, but
now because the Wall Street Journal, you know,
the corporate media suddenly says what you agree
with, well, here you go. See? It's fake.
Don't Can't we tell based on those numbers
they gave us?
Why can't we see that?
Unreal.
And I think, oh, I wanna see what,
I saw of what propaganda and code put
a comment down there. Oh, yeah. It says,
why should we expect the Wall Street Journal
exit poll to be an accurate or truthful
indicator of the election results? They said Maduro
won, their opinion, I agree. It says get
over it and stop trying to interfere in
other nation's affairs. But isn't that a little
bit ridiculous to suddenly take the word of
the very thing that you would show shout
down if it was about another topic you
disagreed with? Oh, that's a democrat paper. No.
Whatever. It's the same stuff.
And that's what I said about the same
poll post. I said, here's end wokeness calling
the election Maduro just won fake. As we
discussed last night, and we did. We called
this before it even ended.
Despite the obvious popular support, which is evident.
I said, should their guy have one? And
this is completely my opinion.
I have no doubt the same lack of
evidence would have demonstrated the opposite.
Meaning that they would have read it however
they wanted to. Right? So should the other
person have won,
are you gonna pretend they wouldn't have gone,
oh, the Wall Street Journal. They're a democrat
shill. They don't They're lying for their side.
Right?
You know that's exactly what would happen. That's
my opinion, but I think that's very obvious.
Elon Musk
tags the same tweet and says, what a
travesty.
Right. He's just just he's just drooling over
that lithium, I think. Solomon Ahmed says, Edison
Research,
Wall Street Journal are Zionists.
They wanted to overthrow Maduro. They had independent
journalists from the west observe the elections.
You're lying is the point, and it's all
about progressing the agenda.
I'm hoping people
with this or any number of other platforms
are are able to see how obviously this
is the same thing we've dealt with
over and over and over and over. Multiple
times, they've tried Bolton has been drooling about
this forever.
Venezuela, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Iran. These guys dreams about
this stuff, and he's been pushing it through
Trump. They've I mean, this is what your
government has been trying to do despite whatever
democrat, republican, d or r game they're playing.
They've done the same things.
It's just sad that we can't get past
this. And I I actually think that a
lot of people are beginning to, but every
time something like this happens, it just wraps
people right back into it.
Now let's get into
we close some of these. The conversation of
what happened in Israel.
And this is a this is a rough
conversation.
Because it's a really disgusting story.
But it's important to understand that this happened.
See if I could just get it to
the ones that are left. Yeah. There we
go. Perfect.
So, PBT breaks this down,
and this is this is reported by Ynet
News. Here's the article itself.
This Israeli media is widely reported story. It's
breaking out all over the place. Probably and
by the way, in the show me on
the chat if something new has happened on
this.
Here's the actual article, sexual abuse.
They they say of terrorists. Right? But all
we're talking about is people that were detained
without charge. That's easily proven.
So they write, 10 Israeli soldiers have been
detained for gang raping a Palestinian well, it's
multiple Palestinian prisoners. Oh, apparently a man and
a female, or more from the,
said Tiananmen
torture camp. This is the same torture camp
in which now you could argue that's just
as, you know,
flim like, as Israel saying, rape dungeons and
so on.
I I would I mean, I would agree
calling it a torture camp is a but
the right but the point is that we've
already proven that they are torturing people. So
technically, it's accurate. But still, I argue it's
better just to call it a, you know,
a a tangent detention camp or whatever that
they torture in. Right?
But it says, this is the site, the
same torture camp in which Palestinians were raped
to death,
by the way, covered by the United Nations,
covered by human rights groups,
with electric rods.
Zionist politicians are rushing to protect the soldiers
and fighting the decision to detain them.
And just in care We'll get to this
in a second, but remember, they publicly
admitted this.
People like the the the the religious Zionism
party elements of this.
Or the Jewish power party elements of this.
The the Netanyahu coalition
have publicly said this is okay and that
they can do what they want. I'll show
you the actual discussion that's happening again today,
where they're literally debating about whether it's okay
to rape these people.
This is crazy that this is not what
this has to show you is that the
people like the Matt Millers, Blinken, Biden, Trump's,
RFKs of the world don't care about that.
They know this is the what they're dealing
with because it's everywhere. They have to deny
it all the time. They know. They see
this stuff. And they're not just denying murdering
people in Gaza. This is what the Zionist
people entities
have done to this country.
These people are justifying
fighting for rape.
Guys, this is not some hyperbolics hyperbolic story.
This is crazy.
Now, n this is the the new case
from 1 net news. Here's the New York
Times reporting,
discussing when and this is the point. This
is discussing where they were using
hot iron rods to rape people, some of
them to death. This is The New York
Times.
We've already covered this.
Now here is Muhammad Shehada.
Israeli soldiers have severely gang raped a Ghazan
detainee
at this camp. The case was so extreme,
the victim had to be hospitalized and the
IDF had to detain 10 of the reservists.
Now the they're they're official capacity at this
point, so they're they're part of the military
operation.
Israeli ministers are now calling the rapists
holy, calling them heroes,
demanding their release. Guys, this is not made
up. This is in Israeli media.
Now, I'm gonna show you the images of
people like Smotrich,
face
trying to force the door open.
Trying to get these people released, calling them
heroes. And they are publicly acknowledged to have
gang raped these people who are under custody.
Israel's Knesset is currently on a summer break,
but it's currently holding an emergency discussion.
This is happening now.
To defend the rapist IDF soldiers who were
detained for gang raping a Ghazan detainee so
severely that they were hospitalized.
That's what it's saying right here.
And this is the, the Yemen field, I
guess, is what this is called, our field
office or field location.
Yemen field raid.
Yemeni field raid.
He says Israel Israel's finance minister is calling
the rapist soldiers heroic warriors,
demanding their immediate release.
This is him talking right there. The security
minister,
many ministers and a member of Knesset are
defending them too.
He says IDF soldiers deserve respect. IDF soldiers
will not arrest the last of the criminals.
I'm calling
the,
fast triad, take your hands off our heroic
warriors.
He's talking about the people that were arrested
for raping these people.
They were they were hospitalized
because of it.
And this says,
under the reader's note,
the same soldiers
suspected of sexually abusing the terrorist,
a detained person without charge, who arrived at
the hospital with bruises on his anus. His.
As I understand that it's also a woman,
by the way.
But this is what we're talking about to
the point to where they have to fact
check this guy. He's openly calling them heroes.
He goes on to say Israeli journalists and
public figures are also rushing and scrambling to
defend the IDF gang rapists who severely assaulted
the gods and civilians.
There are wide calls for pro rapist protest
in Israel now.
It's all over the place, guys. They're calling
to stamp protest for these people defending them.
So we're like the one that burned the
child what was it? The,
the child,
Ollie?
And they they were pr dancing and praising
and burning effigies of a of a child
saying Ollie is burning alive or on the
barbecue. Right? That these are the people we're
talking about. They're and they were proudly defended.
The Gaza rape rank got gang rape victim
was hospitalized with a serious wound on his
rectum. Israeli media is calling him a Nakba
terrorist
to cover it up.
Like, what they're trying to do is
water down the term Nakba.
Like, they're just that, like, Nakba terror so
a catastrophe terrorist?
They know what it means. They know it
represents the first catastrophe to where they ethnically
cleansed and genocided all these people. That's why
they're just trying to use it another way.
But every single detainee at this area is
a civilian. And they've never been charged with
a crime or put on trial. Not a
single one. Cadabatants are detained elsewhere.
Israeli and that's the point. That's that's why
people have highlighted this. Even the New York
Times. This location
is
this is like the the Guantanamo Bay scenario.
Israeli Israelis are rushing to the site for
a mass protest. We'll show you some videos.
They're not there to demand the release of
the unjustly kidnapped and systematically tortured gang rape
causing civilians.
These protesters are there to show solidarity,
full support for the idea of gang rapists.
Here's Owen Jones
highlighting what Prem Thacker from The Intercept says,
or I guess now ZTO news. Thought it
was The Intercept.
He says, as the Israeli parliament debates whether
it's okay to rape prisoners, I will show
you that next, guys. It's not a joke.
A mob, including lawmakers,
multiple,
attacks the base in a protest
to release the 9 soldiers or more suspected
of sexually assaulting the prisoner.
They literally push their way in. I'll show
you the examples of the politicians doing that.
Owen Jones says there have been multiple allegations
of rape and sexual abuse of Palestinian women
and men by Israeli soldiers for months. Guys,
for decades.
I've done entire segments on this going back
decades, showing you the evidence of their own
media highlighting what they've been doing to both
Israelis and Palestinians.
The western media have overwhelmingly ignored those allegations,
you know, while completely highlighting and repeating the
ones that have been proven to be false.
Now Israelis are literally rioting in support of
sexual assaulting Palestinians.
You could make you that speaks for itself.
Jeffrey Lofredo,
showing the same videos.
This person says,
the protesters broke through the gate
at the seed Yemen Yeah. It's kind of
a common seed to many in Yemen, Yemeni,
gate, whatever it's called. And now they are
demonstrating at the base of the calling for
the death to the terrorists. Know, they're calling
for the death to the people that were
raped. That's how that usually goes. Right?
So can you think about this? Of all
the Israeli push about how you're denying rape,
here are people that are not only denying
that this is a problem, but now asking
for the people that were raped to be
killed.
Wonder why that's not being talked about.
Me too, unless you're a Palestinian? Right? How's
that work?
Oh, wait. This is,
forgot what he said. Hold on. Jeffrey Lefredo
says,
for months, Palestinian men have been kidnapped from
Gaza and brought to this is what I
was trying to say before, Cyttingian Timmian
Prison,
where dozens of reports of torture and rape
have been reported
all across the board from human rights groups,
from the UN, from even peep New York
Times have shared it.
Palestinians have reported that they have had burning
hot metal rods forced up their anus. Minister
of National Security, Ben Gavir, responded to these
allegations,
and this is the reality, guys, by admitting
that they were true
and that the guards,
quote,
rule the prison without question and do whatever
they please,
and proposed a solution to military prisons that
were overcrowded with Palestinian prisoners,
killing the prisoners.
We covered this.
The corporate media didn't care.
All the ones supporting Israel ignored it.
Right on the surface.
He says now because some prison guards are
being investigated for systemic rape
systematic rape of Palestinian detainees, Israeli civilians are
driving hours into the desert and storming the
prison in solidarity with the rapists.
These are average Israelis in some cases.
Here is Maryav from 972 magazine.
And here here's a video. Actually, check this
out. This is a Israeli member of Knesset
forcing his way in.
So the ones in green are, I believe,
the prison guards or at least the the
authority kind of controlling this area. And the
point is that they're the ones
holding back the mob until they get through,
which happened.
And the point is they're trying to get
through because they're trying to get through, in
some cases, screaming to kill the people that
they're have detained.
So all this claim for the only democracy
and all these arguments that's like the west
like, this is think about this happening in
the United States
of of Lindsey Graham trying to force his
way into a prison to and calling for
the murder of a person that was arrested
without charge.
That's what's happening here. Here's what he
does.
See? And now and he started this. So
yeah. The I mean, it's already going, but
the point is then now they started getting
very aggressive and pushing at the fence. And
she says, is there a word for coup
but by sitting by a sitting member of
the Knesset?
Here is a member of Knesset breaking into
a military base to protest the military prosecutor,
arresting
soldiers accused of torturing and raping Palestinian detainees.
Here is the actual discussion going on today.
An Israeli member of Knesset from Likud, Netanyahu's
party, stated
that is it is legitimate to rape Palestinian
detainees in Israeli prisons.
This is not a joke.
These are not fringe politicians, guys. These are
the ones from the ruling party
whose leader was given a hero's welcome at
the United States Congress a few days ago.
This is disgusting. Here's just the they they
caption it right here.
And you'll you'll see them.
Right there.
To insert a stick in a person's rectum,
is that legitimate?
Shut up. It says, yes.
If he is a Nakba, everything is legitimate
to do. Guys, that's a legitimate argument from
a leading member of the Israeli government,
saying, yeah, we can do whatever we want
because we called they're not charged with a
crime.
And even then, we're supposed to pretend that
they're that this is democracy and they're saying,
yeah. As long as we claim they're a
terrorist, you can do whatever you want to
them.
Rape? Torture? Yeah. They're like, yep. Yep. Exact
shut up. Yes.
My god.
And that's what it says right there.
So here's what you see after that. This
is what happened.
Now now they're inside, and they're trying to
hold off this mob.
See, these are prisoners in there. Look at
them trying to break this open. It looks
like some in the green. So my point
is, this is what we're talking. This is
the divide
where you've got people in authority, random people.
Like, it's just it's completely scattered. Some of
which don't care. Some of which are and
they're literally think about being those people in
those jails. Arrested for arrested for being Palestinian.
And these people are calling And and some
of them have been raped.
And now, they're coming in there because they
wanna murder you. Sure sounds like a democracy
to me. Right? I mean, it does, actually.
Mob rule. Exactly right.
Oh, actually, no. I'm sorry. That's the wrong
video. That's the wrong but, anyway, my point
is these people are be trying to force
their way into this conversation.
Right. Right.
So hold on. So let me show you
that one next since I brought that up
already. Was it this one?
Hold on.
Oh, damn it. Okay. Well, I I'm almost
certain that I had the video.
Maybe I just missed remember I saw that
wrong. Any case, the point was I was
under the I thought that was so so
the this clear for what's going on is
that the ultimate point is they're trying to
force their way in. Many of them got
through the fence. They're try they're basically pushing,
trying to get these people killed.
That's I I was under the impression that
that was that video, but I guess I'm
wrong. So this this is still the same
point though. These are these are people inside
forcing back and forth against the mill the
people in the green who are trying to
hold them off, essentially.
We just think of how terrifying this must
be even for them. There's no accountability here.
Where where where are the the police or
the like, just they're most of them are
on their side. Like, it's it's this is
what happens when you allow the kind of
people like we're talking about, the Zionist extremists,
to be in charge. Guess what? Guess what's
leading your country right now? A Christian Zionist.
Here it says oh, no. We already showed
you that. I this is the part to
me that I just can't get past.
You realize that they know we can see
this. Right? That they know that the world
can see this.
And they're openly shouting out openly that we
yes. We can rape them. That's legitimate.
I just it just blows me away. And
then you've got people like Matt Miller and
Kirby and Biden and Trump and our gay
openly defending
this entity.
Again, as I'll say every time, no matter
what, not all Israelis, not all Jews, but
definitely a per a majority of the Zionist
influenced
population.
And that goes well beyond just this one
country.
Here,
same point. She says years of incitement. This
is Maria from, 972. Years of incitement, dehumanization,
impunity, and total disdain for the rule of
law have led us to this point.
She's an Israeli. She's openly and this is
the point. Because this is breaking down in
front of us. And what do you get
from your government? More blind support than even
their population.
That has to show you something. Whether that
is control, influence, bribery, sexual blackmail. I don't
know. But that doesn't make sense.
And look at them just trying to hold
these people off.
Here is
Haaretz.
US pushing to deter Israel from striking be
Oh, that's the wrong one.
Oh, man. Hold on.
I knew I hit that. I saw I
The Early when I was getting ready, I
I think I hit something, but I can't
go back.
Well, well, we'll just skip it. It was
it was most likely like one of the
we'll show you some of these Harrett's articles
that just sort of showing you any of
these right now is that the Harrettes articles
are just it's like it's if we were
to say this in this conversation in the
United States, you get
mute most of the right at this point,
calling you a Hamas supporting terrorist or whatever,
and you'll find far more specific and stated
things in Israeli media.
Saying, like, we're gonna show you later, Netanyahu
is sabotaging the ceasefire talks. And yet we
say it here and they're like, you're a
conspiracy theorist. It's just how is this actually
happening?
God, I wish I remember what that was
now. This obviously was the article we have
from before about Beirut.
Oh, well.
So continuing this conversation, here's cuts news. Far
right Israeli minister,
and this is Smotrich,
leads Israeli settlers in storming
this area,
leads them,
By the way, in support of rapists
and call demanding the execution of Palestinians.
Along with the Knesset members, he called for
protests during which they stormed the military base
following the rest of multiple jailers
for torturing and sexually assaulting Palestinians.
Now just to realize, guys, this is that's
ongoing
as the Knesset debates about how they can
torch rape people to their heart's desire.
Cuts News Network is just simply showing you
that what's always going on. So all these
people that are in those prisons are people
like this.
Doctors,
nurses,
teachers,
painters,
Palestinians.
Being arrested, being blindfolded, being stripped, being tortured,
in many cases right here. Sometimes being killed.
Being taken away. And then almost all of
them later being released, which I don't even
understand that. But they're still holding 10,000 plus
people in their prisons. I mean, I've been
talking about this from the very beginning.
Admitted to is about 3,700
something that don't are admittedly without charge. It's
way more than that.
These are these are prisoners. They're torture. These
are
hostages.
They're not charged. They're being held indefinitely.
And you can look at these people, guys.
I mean, this is what they're doing.
These are the people getting raped in prison.
She said, this is the art the post
says, a Washington Post investigation has concluded.
So corporate media. Not that that means it's
true, but it shows you things are shifting.
Palestinians are subject to deadly abuses in these
prisons. A Palestinian prisoner died from a spleen
rupture and rib fractures after being beaten by
the guards. Palestinian prisoners have died due to
negligence. Now we know they've died due to
rape, torture, and everything else under the sun.
The one that goes to the one we've
talked to before of the hot rod and
others that some one of them died from
this. That's where that actually came out. Now,
here's the article so you can read it
for yourself. Palestinians recount deadly abuses in these
prisons. It is Guantanamo.
That's what he says.
Here is another example. And Adam makes an
excellent point here, guys. No matter what you
think is happening, whether you Where do you
even think these are terrorists? They're not.
Many of them are wearing scrubs, by the
way. The point is,
never in history have the good guys taken
pictures like this. Now, I technically disagree with
that.
They wouldn't be good guys at the point,
but in the in the framing,
you could find examples of let's say, American
soldiers taking stuff like this during Iraq and
so on, and they're framed as the good
guys. But the ultimate point is the same.
People that are doing this,
no matter what side they're on, are not
the good guys. That's crazy to me. And
it's it's a great point because this is
showing you that they're
taking pleasure from doing this to people.
Posting on TikTok with smiley faces and laughing
about it.
And he says, and then they insult our
intelligence, calling most of the most moral army
in the world.
Mordecai here says, what and this is Mossad
commentary posting this. This is from July 25th,
guys.
It says, good morning from beautiful Gaza,
and they play this video.
Just making them all chant something. All blindfolded
and terrified standing out in the freezing
cold.
Guys, that's what they're doing. They're they're having
fun with torturing these people.
And what he says is,
what you are showing, it's proof that you
are nazi zionist. Keep
good good keep showing these videos for good
history record. He's, I believe he's a a
an Israeli Jew in Israel.
That I think is that's just, you know,
in broken English kinda translation. But what he's
calling him out.
Zachary Foster. Now this one really upsets me
only because it's the same kind of conversation
as what they would do, you know, highlighting
the the women that are in Gaza. Right?
It's just it's a terrifying story.
Whether or not they're actually IDF members and
POWs, which most of them were. And still,
if you could just be objective and stand
back and go, yeah, it's probably terrifying. You
know? And then even though they probably killed
children and laughed and danced about it before
it happened, the point is that they're women,
and they're in an area full of military
men. And that that's no matter what war
setting, that's terrifying.
And And so that's why they constantly push
out the idea of the women and the
children. Because they want you to act like
you they feel that way. So here's an
example, and we already told we already pointed
this one out.
This is a woman who's been taken, has
been held indefinitely.
No charge.
Her name is Lian Nasir.
As Zachary Foster, who is a PhD in
Palestinian history from Princeton, said the Israeli occupation
soldiers kidnapped her on April 2024.
She has not been charged with a crime.
This is just one spotlight of 1,000 of
people.
Her imprisonment her imprisonment can be renewed indefinitely,
and it just was for 4 4 more
months. What do you think they're doing? Are
they investigating her? No. This is torture.
She is one of more than 3,400
that they've admitted to publicly.
Palestinian hostages currently being held in Israeli prisons
without charge, where she will likely be subject
to beatings, torture,
solitary confinement, sexual abuse, or death.
So think about this. 4 months now, 4
more months.
If they're raping men, what do you think
they're doing to her? Now I'm not assuming.
I'm not playing the Matt Miller game here.
I don't know what's happening.
All I'm saying is that if what's the
likelihood of what she must be dealing with
if they're doing this to everybody we can
see? They're coming out of there with limbs
missing, all emaciated,
And now we have evidence of rape going
on.
Which we already knew.
What do you think they're doing to this
woman?
Breaking her. Laughing about it. That's what we
see everywhere. It's not my opinion. I don't
know if that's happened to her. But what
they're doing, they're posting it everywhere.
She used to work at the Woman's Rights
Institution, of course, in Ramallah, before being kidnapped
by Israel's apartheid soldiers.
But because she's a Palestinian hostage rather than
Israeli hostage, Mainstream Media will not cover her
story.
Typical.
Now PBT also highlights the American settler hostage,
Liat Atzilli,
who spoke to he Haraz,
had a different story. And you already know
this story.
She tells Horetz that Hamas treated her humanely
and took care of her.
These are just a few of her statements
in this interview, which you can read for
yourself.
It's right here. In Hebrew, so most Americans
won't know it exists.
As it says,
talk to her kidnappers in Gaza for weeks
about religion, politics, about the holocaust, about life.
Right. Let's pretend like she'd be talking to
the Jew haters about the Holocaust. Right? Because
it's not what they are. They are against
Zionists.
Now, again, you're always gonna find some overlap,
but the point is, everything they're telling you
about this is a lie.
Here's what she said in the interview. Hamas
was not scary and repeatedly told her that
they would keep her safe. Hamas went and
got her pizza.
Hamas kept physical boundaries with her and did
and she did not fear any sexual violence
when asked about sexual assault. Hamas fighters would
talk about history, travel, pets, and cooking with
her. They also let her watch TV.
The house she kept was kept in was
completely open and was she walked around freely.
You know, the houses that they bomb without
consideration for who might be in those houses.
Which is why they've killed almost all these
people, I argue.
Hamas fighters gave her a human attitude treatment.
This is her statements, guys. These are her
statements.
That's not to say that there's not others
raping or torturing.
But what I can tell you, as an
objective researcher, that there's no evidence of that.
And every single one that has come out
has told you a story that challenges what
they tell you is happening. Then they try
to make an outrage point about how look
at this, they made her wear this shirt.
They made her hold this oh my god.
They made her clean.
Yeah. And that's quite a deviation from they
raped and tortured her, isn't it?
But that's desperation for you.
But just keeping this in mind. Talking about
what they're doing to these people, and then
asking or the new hearing what's happening in
reverse.
I don't know how this is not the
most obvious thing in the world.
Here, Tiberias is go over, you know, kinda
just breaking down the week for you. Here's
the week.
Monday,
dozens murdered by Israel, bodies left in the
street.
Netanyahu meets with the US secure secretary of
state, given red carpet treatment. Tuesday, children burned
alive by Israel. These are all real, by
the way. Charcoal bodies all over the Internet.
Netanyahu give a speech in congress with private
invitees, 58 rounds of applause. Wednesday,
refugee camp bombed by Israel, many dead, Netanyahu
meets 1st US presidential candidate for private dinner,
Trump.
Thursday, entire families murdered by Israel. Children dying
live on stream. Netanyahu Meets. 2nd US presidential
candidate for private dinner. Oh, I I forget
it which one that might have been the
one of those is Trump. Friday, dozens of
refugees murdered by Israel in front of the
world. UN repertoire likens Netanyahu to Hitler.
Saturday, school bombed by Israel,
dozens killed, figureheads come out to condemn rapporteur
for daring to criticize Netanyahu.
Sunday, children beheaded by Israel and there was
a legitimate case where that was on what
very easily shown. Literal decapitation.
I I just didn't talk about it. Sherwin
beheaded by Israel, tiny, limbless bodies on everyone's
feeds, Israeli figureheads angry that they haven't been
given more arms to murder people faster.
The week repeats
and repeats and repeats.
The massacres change, the bodies are different, the
names and lives destroyed are all brand new,
but the death, the destruction, the pain, the
hypocrisy, and the lies, and depravity at its
root
that never, ever, ever changes.
And the we who cares bear witness,
and the those who dare resist.
We are surrounded by complicity,
by ignorant clowns whose careless pursuit of the
immaterial drowns and screams of children burning alive.
Oh,
there is no escaping it.
We are in the darkest bowels of hell.
Now, clearly, he seems a little bit black
pill, doesn't he? Because it's hard not to
watch what's going on and not lose faith
in everything.
But I I I caution against it because
I know there's good out there. I know
that I think most people are doing or
I think that that's my my point is
always about why they try to pretend they're
doing good things.
It's just time for us to recognize that
the left right paradigm,
and I argue a diminishing
minority,
are desperate to keep you trapped in a
cycle because they benefit from it.
All we need to do is stand back
and recognize that we all feel the same
way Tiberias does.
And that we can change it because we
have the power to do so if we
actually see beyond the 2 party illusion.
Let's not forget though, here's what a TV
anchor said a while ago. This was, I
think, oh, she she reposted on the 25th
July but it was a while
ago. He spoke to live TV and said,
we Israelis are coming.
We're going we're I mean, she paraphrased a
little bit. I'll just pull it read it
to you.
I she I says, I assure you
that it will come. Their their attack.
In case you're confused, I assure you that
it will come. And it says, and the
numbers you did not imagine, that it is
possible. It is possible to get them. And
we are ready to enter international unity.
We are prepared to fight with the United
States.
That's what it says.
And the entire world.
So just make sure you hear that mentality.
These are Israeli
leading
media personalities who are saying, we don't care.
We'll attack you. We'll go after you. We'll
come after the United States. Yeah. That's the
point.
Because that's who we're dealing with. And your
politicians who are co opted by this entity
just don't tell you that because they're
by this entity.
Censored man points out an important overlap with
Saddam Hussein
and,
Erdogan.
He says, this is the Israeli minister of
foreign affairs.
Here, and this is the tweet down here.
You've seen cats before.
He threatens Erdogan from Turkey, who's been outspoken
about Israel, with suffering the same fate as
Saddam Hussein
for threatening Israel.
Oh, look at that.
This is a great tweet by the way.
He says, for those who don't know, during
the Gulf War, Saddam actually launched 39 ballistic
missiles at Israel, which hit Tel Aviv.
Israel saw him as a persistent threat to
their national security.
Israel lob lobbied the US government for a
number of years to push for a war
with Iraq, with Netanyahu addressing congress and urging
them to take action. So again, how many
times have we talked about this? Just like
Osama bin Laden and the rest, they were
the ally until they weren't anymore.
Here's the central factor for why.
So this guy thought he had it all
tied up.
United States government
and now it's the United States sells them
out. He becomes the biggest boogeyman of the
world, and Israel pushes them to take him
out and suddenly they do it. And and
what did that do?
That benefit this country? That it benefit the
Middle East? No. It benefited Israel at the
expense of everybody else.
It says, for those who don't know, he
shot those missiles at Tel Aviv. Israel saw
him as a threat. Israel lobbied the US
government for a number of years to push
them to war with Iraq, with Netanyahu addressing
congress
and urging them to take action. What did
we just see? Look at that. What was
he just doing? Urging for war. Same old
thing round and round we go.
Americans were told at the time that the
Iraq war was, of course, due to Iraq's
involvement in 911 and possessing WMDs, both of
which were lies.
Both were lies.
And they knew at the time they were
lies. We can prove that.
Here, he says Israel's foreign minister clearly acknowledges
that the Iraq war was due to Saddam's
government posing a threat to Israel.
They're brazen about this. They love to suggest
or point out that they can manipulate the
United States.
It says, Erdogan follows in the footsteps of
Saddam Hussein and threatens to attack Israel.
Just let him remember what happened there and
how it ended.
It says, this is also a non NATO
country
threatening a NATO country. Shouldn't that matter to
the NATO alliance?
I guess things aren't as they appear.
Not one Israeli soldier took part in the
Iraq war.
Not one. Approximately 5000 US troops died in
the Iraq war. Over 300 troops from the
UK and other coalition countries also died. Approximately
1,000,000 Iraqi civilians died, famously 500,000
children that
Albright said was worth it.
Over 200,000 Iraqis fled the country as refugees,
and here's the important part overlapping with Venezuela.
Now, think about all the other wars in
the Middle East since 1948, and think about
all those who were that all those wars
were really for. What do you think happened
with those refugees? They were used just like
we're talking about in every other dynamic. Weaponized
migration,
this and Israel playing a central role.
He says, you've been lied to for far
too long. Israel is no ally of the
West. Israel is is no enemy of the
West. Israel is the enemy of the West.
You can decide for yourself. But I think
it's important to recognize, they're literally threatening a
NATO ally because he says the wrong thing
about Israel and says we're gonna set take
you the way of Saddam Hussein, which was
a US ally
until he wasn't, because of Israel.
Now al Masrahi
makes a point about Netanyahu's visit that I
think is important. You can disagree if you
want. I think it's his opinion, but I
think it's interesting to consider. He says Netanyahu's
visit began with an assassination attempt on Trump.
Continue with Biden stepping down, culminated in the
United States Congress swearing allegiance to him, 58
standing ovations breaking records, and ended with an
unprecedented sup purported Hezbollah attack on Drew's children
and the US green lighting a war against
Lebanon.
Except we know that that was a failed
Iron Dome rock rock rocket or intentional, and
it killed those children they used to blame
on Hezbollah. All of this, he's talking about
the idea that this all happened while Netanyahu
is perusing the country.
He says life is pure magic, I tell
you.
The point is that he's suggesting clearly that
this is being done.
It's it's a fair point. Weird how he
comes drifting through the country and all these
things. All the all the stops are pulled.
Don't forget as he points out, as Khaleesi
showed us, they applauded like paid seals.
And that goes on.
56 times or 58.
No. They didn't even count all. I think
it's like 56 actually. The point is that
this was a record breaking standing applause for
a guy that is more obviously committing genocide
than I think anything we've ever seen.
And worse and so it's it's I don't
know what's more alarming. That they either don't
know that or are unable to see it,
or that they know and don't care.
I don't know what's more alarming.
And here is what Adam points out, congress
gave 58 standing ovations for
mass murder.
Much of which was happening while he was
there.
Kenneth Roth points out, while they're cheering him
on, former Israeli military chiefs of staff and
Mossad directors,
people who can't be dismissed as anti semites,
tell congress
that Netanyahu,
quote, poses an existential threat to the state
of Israel.
Why? Because he's now fighting the war in
Gaza for himself,
not for Israel.
And yet they still stand up and cheer
him. They still push all the narratives because
this has nothing to do with anything other
than the interest of the Zionist.
Well, Zionist organization, Israel itself, and whoever they're
manipulating. It's not about you as Americans, even
as Israelis or Jews at large.
These are people standing up in support of
these things and saying,
Netanyahu and what they're doing in Gaza is
not for anything but themselves, and still they
don't care.
Francesca Albanese.
Include what? This is the video I've already
played for you. We'll see where we're at
right now.
She's and this is the quoted from this
video. No toddler gets shot twice in the
head by mistake.
This is doctor Mark Perlmutter.
And we played you many of them, and
I played this more than once, but this
is a very impactful video
showing you what they're really doing. When were
you in Gaza?
End of April for the first couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers.
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in the
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds
to children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital with
gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
And when you say civilians,
is it mostly children?
Almost exclusively children.
I've never seen that before.
Never seen that. I've seen more
incinerated children than I've ever seen in my
entire life combined. I've seen more shredded children
in just the 1st week. Shredded. Shredded. What
do you mean? Missing body parts, being crushed
by buildings, the greatest majority,
or bomb explosions,
the next greatest majority. We've taken shrapnel as
big as my thumb
out of 8 year olds.
The UN reports that to date, more than
80% of Gaza's population has been displaced
and the majority of its buildings
destroyed.
A reality which has taken its own toll
on the well-being of children.
What about the emotional wounds? How can you
measure that?
I can't measure my own.
How do you be
an orphan
watching your family, you know, melted in front
of you and shredded in front of you?
How do you fix that? Ever fix that?
In fact, so many Palestinian children have had
family members killed that doctors created a shorthand
term,
wcnsf,
wounded child,
no surviving family.
I just don't know how you can watch
that.
As a Jewish doctor, by the way, like,
that should matter. Mag, it's just another human
being pointing out what he's seeing
firsthand.
How in the world you can take that
and, you know, what the reality is is
that people that have chosen their side just
act like he's lying. He works for Hamas
or whatever. Despite all the evidence.
It's a really really disgusting time.
That's that's nobody's fault other than the Israeli
government and all those supporting it.
Where were we? It's hard to hear.
Hold on. How did I just lose my
place?
Oh, that's right. I forgot because we played
it from right there. Okay.
So
here's the IDF pointing out on the 27th.
Due to significant terrorist activity and rocket fire
towards the state of Israel from the southern
area of Khan Eunice,
you know, the area that they told everyone
to go to because it was safe, because
they supposedly had it controlled. But now weirdly,
there's rockets flying. Weird but not that we
can see though. Not that anyone has video
of, just statements, which I've said for many,
many years is easy to do.
They've done this before. I've proven this where
they just
write about a net. There's a missile rocket
in a field. And then I just use
that narrative. And by the way, the Israeli
media has broken this down many, many times.
That's not to say that there's not rockets
fired sometimes.
But they have open this is like we
just showed you where they're saying Netanyahu is
fighting this for himself. I mean, that's in
fact what we're seeing in Israeli media.
Wherever that one was, I'll get to it.
Simply saying that he's I just read you
from one of their statements, this one here,
saying that he's doing this for himself, not
for Israel.
So my point is that they'll tell you,
he'll actively engage with war against Gaza and
helpless people to benefit himself politically. They've done
it many times.
So as we're hearing them just go rockets
flew from an area they were supposed to
be protecting,
which is their obligation as the occupier.
They it's just who do the point is
they don't even have to prove any of
this stuff. And then what do they do?
Well, they bomb the location, which is what
they've been doing. So the story is, well,
we had to and now we we re
re the remaining area has been become has
become dangerous.
So that means that they're that inept, let
it happen, or they're lying. Accordingly, at this
time, the area will be adjusted. So all
they're doing is changing the the areas. And
remember, they don't care about these. They bomb
the areas they're in, where they're going, where
they are. It it's constant.
And it's been proven by almost every corporate
platform, every independent platform, and every United Nations
platform, and every human rights group. They just
don't care. And so my point is, as
they say, we'll move them for safety, they've
been bombing this area for months now.
But we're supposed to pretend like now they're
gonna move them because now it's become dangerous?
My god.
All they're doing is moving them into smaller
and smaller areas, scattering them around, watching them
flee like terrified animals, like a pinball in
a pinball machine, they're jamming around, laughing about
it the whole way. They are posting this
stuff on their own social media,
making fun of them.
And here is the result.
A Palestinian girl
removed from under the rubble,
Crushed by an entire building.
This is
every day.
That's what you're seeing, guys. Is that Hamas?
Is there a tunnel? It doesn't even matter.
They're indiscriminately bombing like the UN just said,
like the ICC said, like the ICGs, like
the ICJ said, like every other thing we
have said, like the human rights group, the
Internet Human Rights Watch, inter Amnesty International, Betsalem,
Oxfam, UNICEF, every single group in the world
other than these governments are telling you that
they are murdering people for fun.
But let's keep debating.
Here is what the 7th public display of
Israel flagrantly using human shields
just got caught, posted by themselves, I believe,
on tied to the front of their car.
Remember, they had to make up an excuse
for why they got caught doing that last
time, and here they are doing it again.
Clearly, they care about being held accountable. Right?
Here's my discussion about Human Shield, if you
wanna watch it. The open secret that they've
called the neighbor procedure, they still do it.
They publicly know that.
Syrian girl points out how the IDF tied
a Palestinian dead body to the back of
their car and then drove around. Because why
not?
Clearly, that's what democracies do. Right?
Is that about some kind of Hamas
tunnel concept? Or, you know, they pretend in
their mind they're making sure they're not mined
as they then drive down the street laughing
about it and posting videos?
Damn it.
Well, here's what their own media wants to
tell you if you actually wanna pay attention
to them. In Gaza, Israel lost what remained
of its humanity.
That is Horetz. It was one of the
leading Israeli newspapers telling you Israel has lost
what remained of its humanity.
Right. But let's pretend like it's only us
for antisemites over here. Right?
It's crazy.
They'll call anybody an anti Semite that simply
points out the truth.
I saw Rod discusses how Niles,
stan Stanage
asks Matt Miller
or excuse me, Kirby
about
whether he's a war criminal.
Right? Isn't that what the ICC said? Do
you believe that? And watch the way he
responds.
That they just don't care. Thanks, John.
Just to take the long view of this.
Pretty early in, president Biden's presidency,
February 4th
2021,
he spoke at the state department about his
priorities in foreign policy,
and he said that one of those priorities
was reclaiming our credibility and moral authority.
Prime Minister of Israel is in the judgment
of, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal
Court, a war criminal,
isn't posting an alleged war criminal in the
Oval Office undermining of credibility and moral authority.
No. Yeah. We don't consider him a war
criminal.
But the, international That's it. That's it. That's
it. No. Because we disagree.
Oh, okay. You know, hashtag international law, hashtag
rules based international order. Right? We just disagree.
Well, you that's fine. Then disagree. But you
can't then pretend that you're involved in some
kind of international order, that you pretend like
we're all agree. That's not how that works.
I'm not so you can argue that we
shouldn't be a part of that. There's a
fair argument to be made. But what they're
doing is pretending, and this is more either
Trump or Biden, by the way, that they're
not necessarily the rules based on rational order,
but the idea, the games that are played
with international law. Where they act like they're
binding ba bound or they're they're
acting within it.
And then any moment they disagree, they just
go, no. We think otherwise. Well, these these
things are ultimately not if we're talking about
the ICC, the ICJ, all the international groups,
what we're discussing is provable evidence of war
crimes, which I don't need to sell you
guys on. It's the most I it's mind
blowing to me that people like this think
this won't follow them for the rest of
their life. That Kirby and Miller and the
rest of them won't be haunted by committing
genocide complicity for the rest of their life.
They will.
I don't know how they think they're getting
a lot. Maybe they're threatened and and and
threatened
and
blackmailed as well. I don't know.
My point is to stand there and act
so smugly like you just disagree. Well, the
whole point is you're supposed to say that
international law is what you're bound by. And
then the difference is we listen to the
law. Isn't that what Miller said?
Except here's the law telling you he's a
criminal, and you go, nope. We disagree.
I mean, that's like, next time I run
a red light, can I just go, nope?
I disagree, officer. That's not what I think
happened. Is that how that works?
Maybe you're right too. My point is that
that's not how this is supposed to work.
These people are criminals.
They just have enough power to get away
with it. No criminal court tells.
We don't.
But the, international criminal court tells.
We don't agree. And as we've said before,
we don't find the ICC's,
finding to be, relevant or appropriate in this
case. Oh, and by the way, make sure
you take note of the Israel hostage tag
he's wearing on his on his on his
neck right there.
Why does that make sense?
One of these tags they made up that
are all propaganda based. Most of these are
detainees because they're all IDF members, the ones
we're talking about anyway. There are some examples
of civilians.
And a lot of these were killed by
the IDF. And here he is wearing one
of these tags while he's shouting down the
obvious reality. I wonder if that's connected. What
do you think?
We don't find him to be a war
criminal. He's an ally and a partner and
a friend. Well, the the chief prosecutor says
that, Israel is also legitimate
war aims, of course, but the way Israel
chose to achieve these in Gaza,
namely intentionally causing death, starvation, great suffering,
and serious injury to body or health of
the civilian population
are criminal.
Is that a question? Because if think about
that response.
Just blindly disregard that question. Like, who cares,
right? We already answered. We don't we don't
agree. You don't agree that you're starving, murdering,
raping, torturing. We do disagree.
Right?
Well, so let's just disagree, disagree.
That's not how that works, stupid. It's obvious
that we all see through this. Like, it's
amazing that this is the stance they're taking.
I just am seriously blown away by that.
Of the civilian population are criminal.
Is that a question?
Because if it is if it is, I've
already answered it. We don't consider more equipment.
That's it. Yeah. That is Tory. Thank you.
Next question.
I mean, that's that's crazy.
Even the UK is beginning to pull back.
And here's Arson Androsky, the fake human rights
lawyer, saying now confirmed.
UK drops appeal over baseless and unconscionable ICC
warrants against Israeli leaders.
And they won't push back on it anymore.
They're not appealing it anymore. Why? Because it's
what's going on. You're committing genocide.
And it says, this is not only a
cowardly betrayal of an ally, but also betrayal
of UK's commitment to the rule of law.
Yeah. The rule of law is to disregard
law for your allies' interests. Right?
Maybe to them.
UK will not oppose the ICC to arrest
warrant for his and that's that's the UK,
for crying out loud. And the US
is locked in.
The government, anyway.
On a different note, here is an example
of a, you know, the kind of impunity
afforded to Israelis
even in this country.
And we've talked about that with Saudi Arabia
too. It's not unique to just Israel. Saudi
Arabia gets away with rape and murder too.
And I've made I've did multiple focuses on
this, where they will get in car accidents
or rape women, and then just be allowed
to fly back to Saudi Arabia. Nothing ever
happens. There's there I I forget what I'll
have to bring it up again. I think
it was in Oregon. There was a local
police group that did an entire breakdown.
100 of these people where they tried to
charge them and they just didn't allow to
fly away. The government allows that.
How how in the world is that in
the interest of Americans?
Same point here. Judge agrees to drop charges
of an Israeli diplomat's teen son who ran
over a Florida cop. You probably heard of
the story.
He's 19 years old.
Abraham Gill was arrested in January in Florida,
sunny in I Sunny Isles Beach,
after he intentionally
ran his motorcycle over a police officer, leaving
him with an incapacitating leg injury according to
authorities.
The son of Israeli diplomat, Eli Gill, intentionally
ran over a US police officer where Yair
Nac Netanyahu
resides,
Netanyahu's son.
The US court ruled that he would not
face jail time. Why?
Well, because he's gonna go serve in the
IDF and help kill children.
The last part I added, of course, but
the reality is there is that, well, I'm
gonna go serve in the IDF.
So, okay, then we'll just let you go.
I mean, what if this isn't an I
mean, this is probably the case. He probably
isn't Israeli American. The point is what if
this is an American who then gets Israeli
citizenship, who they allow join the IDF like
a Brian Mass conversation, and then they commit
a crime? Can they go flee the Israeli
military? Probably.
There's no way in the world this makes
sense.
This is not the law. This is
I mean, I don't even know what you
would call it.
And here, Hedy Vertierbo points this out and
says the court in the US recently commuted
the sentence of Israeli diplomat's son. Why? Because
he's joining the Israeli military. This reveals a
lot about US and Israeli legal systems.
And he goes over a lot of examples.
The Israeli who lives in Florida was convicted
of intentionally running over a police officer. He
has 2, 2 previous run ins with the
police.
But the 19 year old in Israel says
I have chosen to serve in the Israeli
military. I'm looking forward to the discipline I
will learn. Oh, he's clearly been coached.
According to the media, he managed to avoid
prison in an unusual plea deal. Unusual, doesn't
sound like the law to me. His statement
about serving in the military is what he
led is what led them to agree to
a deal.
I wonder whether he even actually served in
the military, or this is just what they
said to get away.
In Israel, for many years, courts have similarly
been commuting the sentence to the people who
serve in their military service.
How does that make sense?
Well, it does because they know what's going
on. Clearly, we're seeing it on public display.
So all they do is just go join
the military. You could do what you want,
and we'll remove your crimes.
This includes Israelis who assault Palestinians, of course.
Multiple examples he highlights.
2017,
Israeli's settled use admitted to throwing stones at
Palestinian cars, but the court didn't convict them.
Small one, but it happens all the time.
Why? Because their wish to enlist and serve
in the combat unit.
It goes on and on. There's so many
examples of this and pretty dark ones, by
the way.
But to wrap up here, I wanna make
sure we highlight the fake ceasefire deal. Because
yeah, that's actually still going on. Right? I
mean, I I can't even believe how dumb
this is. That they think we can just
keep saying the same thing for, what, 7
months? And pretend like this is, I mean,
more than that even. It's been going on
pretty much since the beginning, but it only
got, you know, it they were it it
got after the short fake pause, that's when
this really got focused on. But they were
lying all the way through.
But it's amazing to me that this is
still the argument right here.
We just joined POTUS. This is blankin'. With
Netanyahu at the White House, the president emphasized
the need to close the remaining gaps on
the ceasefire. For crying out loud, this is
the 26th July.
We've even closing the gaps for 3 months
now.
Or the if you know the reality, which
is that Netanyahu just is sabotaging it. As
the Israeli media will tell you.
But apparently, you're a racist if you say
that in this country, despite that being the
reality and all. Here's a clip from bit,
Jimmy Dore,
showing you what Trump said.
One of the reasons why you might argue
that in some level, they don't like him
here because he's sort of a wild card.
But I still think that's the choice, my
opinion,
the selection
for many other positive reasons. But here he
is,
as I'll just read what Jimmy Dore wrote.
This is amazing. Watch as Trump says it
is not the Palestinians blocking the peace, but
Netanyahu
that doesn't wanna make a deal,
which we all know by now. This confirms
everyone's suspicion that Netanyahu's plan all along was
to wipe out the Palestinians,
move that those that remained off the land,
and take over the West Bank and Gaza.
Exactly.
But here's Trump on the record, making sure
you know what we've been telling you from
the beginning.
Vladimir.
He wanted to make a deal more than
Netanyahu.
And I I will be
honest, I had a great meeting with him,
Abbas. Right? I had a great meeting with
him.
Abbas being the head of the the Palestinian
Authority, which I do not believe is on
the side of Palestinians. But nonetheless, it's about
Netanyahu that I think is important.
And we spent a lot of time together,
talked about many things,
and it was almost like a father.
I mean, he was so nice.
Couldn't have been nicer.
And after meeting with BB for
3 minutes,
I looked at him and said, you don't
wanna make a deal, do you? And he
said, well,
and the fact is I don't think BB
ever wanted to make a deal. Well, guys,
he said that publicly.
Right? So this is important nonetheless because Trump's
saying it'll reach certain Republicans, but he's Pub
Netanyahu has been publicly saying that. I'll show
you some examples. Hawaii. I thought the Palestinians
were impossible.
I did the Israelis would do anything to
make peace in a deal.
I found that not to be true.
Look at that. That's the both most important
part. That's that's the 75 year reality.
All these people acting on false information and
many not even knowing they're wrong. Guys, my
opinion, that that sums up Trump's entire administration.
And and that honestly, that should be something
you think is positive because that means that
Trump didn't realize he was being played, which
means he might be fighting for good reasons.
I don't really believe that. But at the
end of the day, at least in this
one example, it shows you that he thought
the wrong thing
till very recently.
So how many times did that false impression
manipulate him during his fast administration? With Pompeo
and Bolton pushing very Zionist agendas.
Right? Think about that. So now he's finding
out, well, they that I thought that the
Israelis wanted peace and the Palestinians were the
ones that didn't. Turns out I was wrong.
That's why these things are important.
This has been the reality as far back
as you can look.
Here is this all rod showing you what
Netanyahu brought Trump.
A hat that says total victory.
You know, because total victory and a peace
deal or ceasefire deal are totally the same
thing. No. Obviously not.
Here, again, was the point about Biden
and Blinken
saying, we need to close the gaps of
the deal that Netanyahu is publicly saying he'll
never allow. It's so stupid what they're doing.
They're trying to stretch this out to the
election
in hopes that they see they get some
kind of fake deal to get, you know,
it's all about the manipulation of what you
think is happening.
Here is another clip, which I think is
really embarrassing.
Patel here, Patel is con Patel is constantly
Have He's gotten a lot worse I feel,
over the I I think he's just less
out of He's not in his element when
he's I mean, the point is they're operating
for position where literally everybody knows they're lying.
That's hard for anybody.
Yeah. This guy's pretty good at this job,
I argue. Way better than the KJPs of
the world when he's,
you know, in in a tactful tact like,
in in a position where he
is able to give you lies that are
that most people might take. But eve even
saying that, most people are bad at that.
But my god, when these people are, like
just watch for yourself.
The way that he knows he's caught and
the idea is what he's saying is contradictory
to what he just said, and she even
calls him out for it. And this has
to do with the ceasefire and how they're
blocking that deal, which we know, again, because
Israeli media is telling you how Netanyahu has
systematically
foiled talks to release hostages.
Plain as and simple.
And Hamas has accused Israel of blocking a
ceasefire saying that Netanyahu's government has inserted new
conditions into the proposal at the latest talks.
Is that your assessment as well?
And this comes after Netanyahu's visit to DC
where US officials emphasized the importance of the
cease fires. Are you concerned about the timing?
So I'm not gonna, again, I'm not gonna,
get into the specifics of the negotiating process
and He loves to say that. I'm not
gonna get into the minutia of the specifics
of the well, that's your effing job, man.
Like, it's not like this is some ongoing
investigation or, like, some normal thing we're used
to hearing where you can't get into it.
He does this on one side, and then
we'll wax intellectual for hours about the other
side of it. That's what they all do.
And they've been using that excuse pretty well,
but they she pushes back here. Certainly not
gonna negotiate from up here. There are, a
number of comp No one's asking to negotiate
what's going on. They're asking for basic details,
which is what your job is. The specifics
of the negotiating process, and certainly not gonna
negotiate from up here. There are a number
of complicated details that need to be worked
out,
and I'm not gonna outrun those publicly. But,
again, we think a deal is both achievable,
and we think it's urgent. And as Yeah.
Maybe 7 more months of the ceasefire filling
gaps, you know, and then maybe we'll get
there.
I I mean, that's the kinda point that
makes this real like, I don't know why
the most average people in the world can't
see right through this. Maybe they can.
It doesn't take 7 months to piece out
a ceasefire. And especially when you can see
all of his own statements, which say the
exact opposite of what a ceasefire by definition
means. We have said previously and consistently,
there has been a deal that was on
the table, and Hamas needs to accept that
deal. And we expect these conversations to to
keep on going. That's Israel. Despite despite the
numerous times they have where Israel then changes
the deal and pushes back, and they lie
about it over and over and over and
over and over and over, and Robert's written
about it many times.
To to to keep on going. Has Israel
inserted new condition? Again, I'm just not gonna
speak to the, the negotiation process from here.
That's not a negotiation process. That is the
reality of the circumstances.
And all she's asking for and the point
is it shows you that they know.
Well, did Israel add more information like they
did last time? I mean, that's what's happening.
All of my dad Sure. It's just for
consistency because Sure. You and Matt and other
US officials have not hesitated to say when
the ball is in Hamas's court. So Right.
So just so you understand what you're saying.
Whenever they get the opportunity, they make sure
to tell you that it's in Hamas's responsibility.
They're the one we're waiting on. They have
to accept.
All they're asking before is, like, okay. Well,
is is Israel the one holding it up?
I can't get into the details. I'm not
gonna mire myself in the conversation.
Well, it's exactly the same thing you say
about Hamas who and this is what she
has. Well, whose court is it in now?
I'm just wondering whose court the ball is
in now? I mean, US officials last week
made a went to great lengths to stress
how much they were dialing up the pressure
on prime minister Netanyahu. The deal is closable.
It needs to be closed subject to some
implementation issues. So
so who who is causing the hang up
now? I'm not gonna get into,
again, I'm not gonna get into the specifics
of the negotiations, but let's look at this
from a little bit of a wider lens
and and and and take a step back
here. Consistently,
since,
when I believe it was about
a month and a half ago when president
Biden went into the Roosevelt Room and laid
out the contours of this proposal that had
been on the table, this proposal that,
Israel had agreed to, that Arab partners had
agreed to, that the United Nations had supported,
that the UN Security Council had supported. You
know, the thing that, by the way, we
later found out was completely up in the
air when they did all of that. It
was all a bunch of narratives they spun
about how everyone supports the thing. What they
supported
was the idea of bringing this to the
table for them to then negotiate about. But,
I mean, it's just every step of this
has been an utter manipulation.
Time and time again, it continued to be,
Hamas that,
changed pieces of the deal and changed pieces
of the proposal.
So not a process that is ongoing,
and we're gonna continue to work with,
work through this process, and I'm not gonna
get into the specifics.
Okay. I mean, you just said Hamas changed
the conditions without saying what who is changing
the conditions now, but I understand Right. We
may not get an answer on this one.
Caught himself, didn't he? You see? So he
before was asked about who is the one
doing this. I can't get into specifics. And
then in the answer, gets into the specifics
about how Hamas is the one changing the
deal. I mean, it's obvious that that's the
same thing, but only one side's allowed to
be discussed.
Oops. You just f ed up, man. You
just clearly just demonstrated that your own one-sided
this is but this is how obvious this
all is.
Because there his mandate is to make sure
we're told that Hamas is the one. But
then if you're asked about any other side
of the dynamic, y'all, I can't get into
it because that would be too much well,
that doesn't make sense then. And on top
of that, we've shown you 45 times over
that Hamas has been very consistent about what
they've asked for from the beginning, which is
why we've already proven to you and has
been admitted by Israeli media that Netanyahu was
caught lying about it. Then in the beginning,
he said, Netanyahu or Hamas doesn't want a
deal. And that they weren't offering it since
day 1.
Since the 1st week, according to Israeli media,
According to any numb 972 magazine, I believe
was the one and plenty of others that
have covered this.
And and including the United Nations and Qatar
and Egypt, the ones that are involved. They've
offered it from the 1st week. And Netanyahu
just lied about it to the public until
eventually it came out to his own people
that he was holding off a deal, And
they said, the deal is secondary,
and, a, lost their minds. Rightly so because
that's their families.
And then from there, this whole thing is
be continue to deteriorate
deteriorate.
Oh, and because they're that's the people that
they're using.
And that's where this becomes important. Here's the
here at again. Netanyahu didn't go to Washington
to end the war. He went
to get a means to prolong it.
It's amazing how the Israeli media keeps telling
you what's going on, and our is our
own government lies to us about it.
Now here are just some older articles. This
one's from February 2024.
Netanyahu rejects the ceasefire proposal, insists on total
victory over Hamas. Read it for yourself. He
says that, we won't do this until Hamas
is gone. Well, pretend how that makes sense
with ceasefire. Have a ceasefire with the group
that we're gonna destroy first.
People are so childish about this. Here's the
one from
May. Netanyahu hoped Thomas would reject the deal.
When he didn't,
he sabotaged it. I mean, that can't get
any more clear. That's exactly what Robert wrote
about, but he got called a racist. Well,
here's Harrut saying the same thing. Here is
the recent one I just read from
October. How Netanyahu
has systematically
I'm sorry. I I don't know why I
said I'm I was just doing it really
quickly and looking at it. It's actually,
it's
it's weird how they do that, don't they?
How they kinda reverse it? But so we're
talking about July 10th. It's not it's the
backwards. But how Netanyahu has systematically foil talks
to release hostages from Hamas captivity.
It's just weird things, by the way, just
a quick note about the difference there or,
like, the metric versus it's always just funny
how it seems the US is the standout
in all these things. In many ways, doing
things that are not as accurate. But
Netanyahu is foiling these talks.
Their people know that. And on my point
about secondary, here's the report from CBC News.
Defeating Hamas is priority. Everything else is secondary,
says
Israel. Corporate media.
Here is the all we are all hostage.
This is an Israeli group of is hostage
families. What are they saying? He uses our
family members to build support for himself
as he abandons them over and over and
over again. That's written by Israeli hostage families.
And what they're doing is they're calling out
the pin he's wearing
for their family members while he's sabotaging the
deal to get them back while bombing the
places that they're in
while they're eating pizza and shopping with their
torture, rape, dungeon people.
Netanyahu is wearing a yellow ribbon known as
lapel to support the family's hostage. They're calling
him out.
Here is a lot more of them.
1,000,
if not I mean, that's a lot of
people, participate in a demonstration in Tel Aviv
demanding Netanyahu's
Netanyahu's resignation
and an exchange deal with Hamas. They want
them to take anything that will bring them
back, an end of the war, everything. They've
been saying this for months now.
You just get lied to by your government,
your media. And, of course, the very partisan
media will lie about it even more.
Middle East eye, Israel has agreed to a
hostage exchange and evacuation,
evacuating the Philadelphia axis, which is the other
illegal occupation, before Netanyahu introduced new conditions.
Israeli journalist reported.
Well, there you go. There's your answer. Right?
So here's the Israeli media challenging what he
just said to US press,
which is
Israel introduced new conditions after it had already
been exchanged. That's what keeps happening. And it's
always about some idea that, well, we have
to destroy Hamas first, obviously.
Well, then how do you have a ceasefire
deal with them?
He added that the entire Israeli security apparatus,
along with the US, are pressuring
Netanyahu. But then standing up and lying to
the media about it because that's what they
always do,
It's incredible.
So easy to see. Now one last point
about the food, which I wanna make sure
we saw. Because here's Elon Levy still screaming
into the dark over here with no one
paying attention about the idea of the food.
Israel has facilitated, he says, the delivery of
6,004
645,000
tons of food into Hamas run Gaza since
they declared the war,
which by the way is an admission, not
a boast. I'll show you why.
An independent study found deliveries are more than
sufficient for the population. Oh, sure. An independent
study by
Visiguard 24 or Cogat. But reality being that
you can easily prove from every angle that
that's a fraction of what's needed to barely
survive.
Amidar says, Netanyahu yesterday, there is no hunger
in Gaza. That's on the that's July 25th.
He said this in front of congress. Elon
said the same thing. It's all a hoax.
Well, every entity that has any standing in
this conversation has been screaming that people are
dying from starvation. We can see them.
They're gaslighting the world, guys.
Well guess what? You know what 60 645,000
tons breaks down to? The reality comes down
to the idea that
about 70 7,500
tons a day
was the pre war
average.
Here is the Washington Post.
An aver and this is the same point
we keep showing you. This is the same
on their snapshot report that before this current
reality,
500 truckloads including fuel was the average daily
delivery.
And that, whatever your thoughts about that, was
the reality, and that was barely maintaining food
and security,
according to everybody.
So the point is when they go below
that, they're hurting people.
Before 500 trucks would enter each working day.
Right?
The prework daily average weight of goods on
those 500 trucks was about 7,500
tons.
So he just doesn't think you're smart enough
or any of us are smart enough, and
maybe because he's not that smart,
to break this stuff down. So, a little
quick math, that breaks down to 86 days.
86 days. What are we at? 250 plus
or whatever? I'm I'm not even keeping count
anymore. 9 plus months?
86 days. So the math that what he
is boasting about, 645,000.
That's 86 days worth.
So, he's telling you that they're starving people
while pretending that he's giving you more than
they need. How many times do I say
that?
Terrorists are people that do bad things and
proudly do it.
Worst.
Terrible stuff.
The worst thing on the planet are people
that do those things and then ask for
your praise.
Ask for you to go, good job. You're
helping them. When they're starving children to death.
There's a special kind of place in hell
for people like Ethan Levy. And all the
rest of them that are doing this, laughing
about it, asking for your praise, and then
shouting people down as racist for pointing it
out.
It kills me.
And all the members are there. He's he's
literally posting it for you. I don't even
know if that's accurate. But at the end
of the day, what he's telling you they've
done is right in front of you, and
that breaks down to a fraction of what's
needed. And on top of that,
here's yet another example from the Human Red
Euro Rights Group human hue EuroMed, excuse me,
human rights group.
6 year old Ali Anas Al Tatar
died at the Baptist hospital for malnutrition
due to Israeli blockades on on northern Gaza.
I just I I what I don't even
know. I've lost count, disgustingly enough.
Here is the UN page showing you as
of the 25th, 24th July.
Look at the numbers.
How many times I've shown this?
There were the the the peak the peak
of the highest average per day that they've
been doing since October 7th was a 169
a day. That's it.
Down from 500. That's less
than half.
That's a fraction of the what was required
to maintain food and security before, and they're
telling you they're doing more than ever. They're
just flat out lying to you.
And the point is the numbers are down.
Look at this dwindling number.
All of June, the average was 77
trucks a day.
Down from 500.
Then it was 86 from the 1st to
21st July.
Now it's down for 42.
They're starving these people systematically,
and laughing about it.
And then getting you to pay for it.
On top of that, they just blew up
a water, a a water plant.
Water station.
That's right. And then and then posted the
video on their inst their social media, laughing
about it.
Not a joke. Literally.
With music in the background.
That's it right there. And they they set
it all up. They set that in the
control demolition,
which means they're proving on the record that
they did not need to do it because
that means they were able to plant them,
which means there was not a Hamas present,
no human shield. They did it because they're
destroying infrastructure, they're posting it, laughing about it,
and your government is paying for it,
is gaslighting you away from seeing it.
He says, blowing up a water station that
serves a 1000000 plus people. Here's Eunice Tiroi,
who's the one that broke the story.
Israeli soldiers from the combat engineering corps sharing
footage on their own personal accounts of blowing
up the war the Rafa water reservoir.
Tell Sultan neighborhood.
Guess what?
No. 1st, actually, Glenn Greenwald shares the same.
Is and this is, Heretz. Israeli army commanders
give order.
Give the order on Israeli media, citing this
to blow up the Rafa reservoir.
IDF suspects breach of international law.
Yeah. What do you That's crazy. Israeli troops
with the support of commanders deliberately exploded the
main water reservoir.
That's not gonna be talked about by the
corporate media guys. This wasn't the 20 this
was just today, that he's reporting it. But
I believe this was yesterday.
No. This is 26th.
At least, 26th is being reported. That's why
they posted this. Do you know how they
don't look how fast these things get into
the corporate media when it's something they wanna
talk about? This is out there. They've seen
it. It's covered. It's in mainstream Israeli media,
not a peep in western media. Not a
not a word from any of the Matt
Millers and Kirbys and Patel's of the world.
There is no possible military justification, Glenn says.
It is classic crime against humanity.
But guess what? No one's gonna do anything
about it unless we do something about it.
Now Eunice points out,
Rachel Kory, if you remember her,
spent her final month in 2020 in 2003,
excuse me, defending
the well before
being crushed alive by an Israeli military bulldozer.
2 decades later, Rafa's main water reservoir is
now blown up and shared
in now deleted Insta Stories by a soldier.
23 or 3 year old peace activist Rachel
Corey is crushed to death by Israeli bulldozer.
This is a disgusting story that your government
didn't care about.
She protested to stop them from doing the
same thing they're doing now, and they ran
over her in daylight in front of everybody.
Murdered her.
Nothing happened.
It's a sad story. And we're trying to
change this ladies and gentlemen. This is what
we're trying to change. I believe we are
changing it. And I think that's why this
is so incredibly desperate for them.
Both your government, whether ever you are, the
Israeli government, anybody they're influencing.
This stuff is I mean, the sad part
is that we all can kinda see that,
that this is diminishing. They're losing influence. The
peoples of the world is calling them out,
but they're still pushing.
They're still murdering. They're still genociding these people.
So the set the question remains, are we
do we have to wait until they destroy
everything before we can then find some accountability?
God, I hope not.
The point is though that we can see
it, and it is changing, and we cannot
allow this to go back the way it
was. That is that's not possible in my
opinion, but they will desperately try to contort
this into something that can continue it in
a different way.
Our government is just as culpable. They are
walking in the same line.
We, as honest people of the planet,
need to stand up against this. This cannot
be allowed to continue.
As Craig Mokey Mokeyber points out, and we'll
end with this, for 8 decades,
the US, the UK, and Europe have agreed
to allow and assist Israel to perpetuate an
incremental
genocide and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian
people and plenty of other locations, by the
way.
When the new far right regime took power
in January of last year, they shifted to
expedited genocide, which causes political difficulties for Western
governments. That's what we're seeing on display right
now.
These governments are now working to return to
the more comfortable pace of slow genocide.
We must not let them get away with
their blood drenched game.
No more settler colonialism.
No more apartheid.
No more genocide.
No more impunity.
Hashtag free Palestine.
I think that speaks for itself.
God. I just hope that we can actually
stop this before it is too late.
Speak up. Say something. Talk to people.
I know you see it. I know the
world sees it. And that's what's so hard
about this is that we're all just kind
of, you know, I mean, it's not like
we have the power to stop a nuclear
armed government. But at the end of the
day,
every mechanism that exists right now that should
be able to do something, I mean, is
is happening. But yet, it just keeps going.
So do what you can.
I mean, every single voice and every action
and every statement and every
difference.
So thank you for having the courage to
do this at a time when it's very
difficult, when you're getting more pushback and more
detriment. I mean, God, you guys see we're
dealing with it too.
But we're gonna keep pushing because this is
important. This is why we do this.
I will take a 1,000 lawsuits and a
1,000 censorships and a 1,000 everything else going
on to save one of these children because
that's what we're here for.
So help us.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.