Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news at as we see it from
the last 24 hours.
Sunday, 07/14/2024.
Thank you for joining me today. Definitely important
follow ups.
Now I spent
unfortunately, some of last night as well and
end all day up until this point for
the show today. Doing my best to break
down everything that we have so far
around the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and
the
perspectives, opinions, theories around all of what's going
on, questions about validity,
as we see in just about every event,
that seems to be important.
Now, there's a lot to cover in this
a lot of varying opinions, a lot of
partisan,
But I'll tell you right now as as...
And I'll say upfront that, you know... I
am always somebody, and I've said the I
said this in yesterday show.
It is always okay despite what all the
screaming people in the partisan ship, and I
really more so the the mainstream part of
it would tell you it's always okay to
question these events. It's always okay to ask
questions, whether or not you have evidence to
support those questions. I would argue... Well, it's...
I was gonna say, I would argue it's
not okay. To jump out and say you
know something when you can't prove it. That's
my opinion. Of course, you have every right
to do that. That's called free speech. But
I... My point is that there's a line
there where
Simply going could this have been a fake
event? Could this have been used by them
to promote their campaign? Could this have been
act by a foreign entity? Could this have
been an assassination by our own government? Could
this have been partisan ship and, you know,
democrats trying to take them about. In, yes,
you can ask those questions.
Why whether there or not, there's evidence to
back it up because that's just being curious.
That's what investigation is. It starts with an
interest in something and a question about what
happened. But if you don't have facts or
evidence to back it up, then that's where
you leave it, that it's to question, it
could be.
Now a lot of what's going on today,
and again, with every event,
There's people that are either jumping in because
they see an opportunity to benefit themselves to
scream a narrative that benefits them personally.
A lot of which has already been deleted.
Some of the stuff we went over yesterday,
and and very clearly caution that this was,
you know, showing things that were popping up
at the moment that we weren't buying into
it at that time. A lot of it's
been deleted now. And that's always how there
tends to go. With most of them not
caring to follow up on that and say,
oops, I made a mistake. Just falling into
the next narrative that they wanna push. Other
people are pushing things that benefit the knit
the the parties.
It's about the Republican party. Right? Or about
the Democrat party when you're fighting Trump or
supporting Biden or whatever.
And pushing narratives that support that. Then you've
got the other government level people that are
pushing this and looks you know, we need
to fight against, you know, we need to
initiate gun control measures and we see that
happening Biden or, you know, that kind... We
always see these narratives. And a lot of
that is driven by their agenda if not
all of it, whether or not,
what they're saying is actually backed up by
the facts.
And this is always what you'll see. There's
always people jumping to take advantage of a
large event like this. So keeping all of
that in mind,
yes, we'll ask these questions, but I also
wanna point out that I am always resistant
to the immediate jump to point these things
out as a fact. That's like I said
before. I'm not the person that jumps in
and says false flag. Fake events, cycle psychological
operation without knowing... Then earliest least believing that
the evidence points in that direction. And even
then I would say I believe the evidence
suggests this. I would not say I know
that's happening. The reason I'm saying that is
because
there are a lot of things that I'm
gonna cover right now that I find to
be kind of ind
congruent,
which doesn't mean that there improves this was
fake or so on, but there's something missing
here Or at least the narrative we're being
told in multiple points, I'll show you
I'm just gonna go and say, can't be
true. At least based on what we currently
have in front of us.
And only reason I'm saying that is because
there's obvious inconsistencies with where the shooters were
if that's actually what happened in inconsistencies with
who they're saying the shooter was, even at
this current moment, it seems to be disputed
even at mainstream levels,
We have information about where the snipers were
on Trump side that don't seem to line
up with what things were aimed at or
the fact that they were clearly able to
see that location. I mean,
It could simply
point to the fact that there was some
kind of internal act to take out Donald
Trump, but that's not that far fetched. We've
seen this in our history.
Or it could mean a number of the
other things already listed off. This was a
manufactured event to benefit somebody in particular.
But I think very clearly or or again,
just to be clear, or it just be
somebody who randomly decided to try and shoot
Donald Trump. But if that's the case, there's
a lot that's does... That doesn't really add
up with that.
And then... And then on top of that,
we need to highlight the fact that if
that's the truth, why that why that would
happen. And there is no getting away from
the fact that if you're calling this person,
the living embodiment of Hitler. A person who's
gonna destroy democracy.
That's radical rationalization right there, you would literally
you could see a logical drive to push
somebody to take an action that would be
violent. And again, I would still put the
onus on the person that took action and
not the media screaming false information. But it's
still important to highlight that they're doing that
as that's always what they put on us.
So today, we are gonna go through
a multiple angles of this We're gonna start
with the
kind of flag
misinformation from yesterday reasonably quickly is to show
you that a lot of these central players
and at this at this moment, mostly on
the right, you'll see it everywhere. But depending
on what the narrative mostly supports or at
this point Trump that was shot at, and
so that's gonna be a real, you know,
important their republican side of the conversation, you
see a lot of people jumping out, as
I said, putting out false things. And they're
not addressing that. I think it's important because
there's still a lot of the ones leading
the conversation now in these spaces, projecting all
these conversation narratives and yet, they've already been
shown to been at least
irresponsible with what they claimed happened and not
like we think, but saying this is the
guy and then deleting the tweet. That's important
to see.
And, of course, even corporate media are even
usually, corporate media as well.
Trump fell on the stage and they jumped
out like, predict keyless things. And I mean,
at the earliest moment, this was happening, you
could tell that this was not Trump tripping
on stage. And yet, that's actually what Cnn
put out first. Wall washing post arguing, you
know some loud noises and, you know, like,
really weird ways they covered this, which now
they've changed their headlines, but showing you how
easy
media in general, independent mainstream alternative media, corporate,
people lie. That's just the reality. And we're
also gonna talk about the story itself. And
I mean, like, just from the core I
I... Information. That's why I framed it the
way we did today. Let's review the facts.
Let's look at where we can prove.
And of course, I'm going to include my
opinions around this, and in some cases just
theo about how this might make sense, but
I'm always very clear when I'm doing that,
But I really I'm gonna try to hold
back my opinion,
other other other than the moments where I
think it's important to connect dot.
Map sure. I'll slip away and do that.
That's... I'm gonna try as we go through
because I really want this to stick to
what we can see in the evidence we
have in front of us and to break
this down to make this very
objective.
The information around the story and the timelines
and the different videos. It's some very inconsistent
information
in regard for the other... The testimony we
got from the side, people that were there
that saw the person, And we went over
most of this yesterday, which I'll highlight that
show when we start. It was kind of
inconsistent in all over the show because it
happened right as we went live. We might
have very well been 1 of the very
first people live talking about this, only because
as my lit literal intro was playing, somebody
in the chat, said this, I happened to
look for it really quickly. And at that
point, there wasn't even mainstream articles about it.
Just happened to find a video online that
we jumped right into. And so, like, the
very first thing in the show is I
think Trump was shot. So it's an interesting
timing of it all. Just coincidentally.
Then we're gonna get into, of course, the
conversation of the person. Over the allegations around
who this person is. Matthew Cook or somebody
else. There's all these different narratives lying around,
discussions about
explosives apparently now being found in this person's
car, but there's a lot of dispute around
there's even people arguing there's more the 1
shooter. I mean, this is kind of stuff
we see every single time. But we shouldn't
be dismissing or blindly accepting any of this
stuff.
And I think the inconsistency
inconsistencies around the person.
Is really striking me, and we'll get to
that as well.
And then, of course, the the interesting partisan
shape around it, and and the the the
the many people in fact. People that I
highly respect coming out and arguing point blank
that they think this was a staged event
or possibly fake.
I'm not sure if Leaning that direction,
but I think it's important that we don't
dismiss these things.
And then, of course, we... I wanna discuss
toward the end
different as we pointed out, Biden arguing this
means we should remove, you know, go after
our,
so Ar rifle, you know, guns in general
for the most part, but then the different
types. They always try to aim at first
and bring it down, and even highlighting that
Trump
while back, made conversation made points about taking
things first worrying about constitutional later, Like, just
showing you that it seems to be a
government thing in that direction. But also overlapping
with some Israel conversation and really just how
absurd it is that you have all these
politicians coming out and saying, oh, I hope
the best Trump, even though 30 seconds ago,
they were calling him Hitler. That doesn't really
mean same it's all show and it comes
to these political standings,
and then, of course, the overlap with Israel,
while a lot of this is getting ignored
even the israeli politicians coming out. And so
no, there's no room for political violence as
they literally murder children with bombs, in regard
to political violence.
Now,
a lot more we'll get into.
Different partisan perspectives as well, but let's follow
through this do our best to remain objective
and and, you know, not allowing emotions to
dictate this conversation. Now I wanted to start
with
the show from yesterday just so you guys
can see it... It's it's it's a... It's...
I'm... I asked Jason. I don't know if
he'll get to it right away to to
kinda try to break down what we went
over yesterday. Because a lot of these clips
that are circulating now is, like, which I
always love.
Loom and the as exclusive
even though we were talking about last night,
you know, a lot of them love to
do that. Breaking the new thing I was
talked about even though a lot of people
already have.
The lot of this stuff is on the
show that's kinda of throughout the show. It
wasn't as long as usual, but there's a
lot in there that you can see and,
you know, interesting things will... We'll try to
touch on all of it today. But there's
a lot of real time kinda of thoughts
and
comparisons that are hard to reproduce. So in
that, hopefully, you'll take time to look through,
but also don't miss the conversation here, which
is inch... This is gonna get buried along
with a lot of other things by this
conversation.
This really weird overlap with the global alliance
for response media, and this whole presentation at
Congress and Ben Shapiro, and Elon Musk going,
yeah. We should fight them and pointing at
Ga that Twitter just recently realign with. It's
this absurd dynamic that nope seem they don't
see any conservative comment they pointing it out
unless I'm missing it and please tell me,
it seems really strange to me.
That they can be highlighting this as the
biggest problem for conservatives. And on July first,
Twitter realign themselves as a partner of Ga,
which is the world economic forum flagship product.
And yet we have Ben shapiro calling at
Elon musk saying, yes, I agree and yet
rounds and round the go. It doesn't make
any sense.
So I don't miss that. It's very fascinating
and in just alarming conversation. Again, we go
over a lot of other stuff in this
as well.
Now,
the first point about the misinformation from yesterday.
And First we'll highlight what Matt Said, because
I agree with this. And this is the
thing that a lot of people that aren't
pulled into this 2 party game
or the culture politics of at all, which
is not just a left wing thing. Clearly,
the right place just as much of a
part of this kind of woke culture war
concept.
They just play it from a different angle.
The point is that Matt Titus simply said,
and this was yesterday. Clearly, I think in
my opinion, at least referencing what's going on.
He says, I just want information, but every
channel is culture war. And he's not wrong.
You you try to look in and this
is why it's important to have discernment
and just you, you know, you look at
all forms of information. You look at corporate
media too and just
pepper it with the reality. Well, they lie
about a lot of stuff. They constantly misinformed
inform or in this of entertainment mainstream. In
this case, if you're looking at all these
independent channels,
A lot of them are very part partisan
and you have to just accept the fact
that they're going to omit things that aren't
part that aren't within their narratives or and
maybe they're even realize they're doing it. But
he's not wrong. Every channel, like most of
them I should say are really you know
what it is. It's because that is an
easy way to benefit. And I'm not saying
that do that because of that, but it's...
It's almost subconscious that you you fall into
the crowds, the partisan ship the paradigm, and
you clearly get pat on the head for
it. You know why people who are non
par and a very objective get boxed out
of this because that is what kind of
it's the antidote to the illusion, guys. So
my point is that all these channels they
fall into the culture war of it all.
Right? Trump's is the biggest hero of our
time. I mean, really guys
Like, I It's just... It's... You can believe
he might be the best president for the
next time of not even to get into
all the lies around at all. But to
just
And it it's the same equivalent to me
of lia someone like John Mccain after they
die, which we all should make fun up
because the guy was a monster, like most
of them.
Including Trump by the way.
So now all of a sudden because he
get shot at the guys this living hero,
and this is the most iconic time Laura
to I, I just... It's it's actually kind
of ridiculous.
Now I'm certainly could be wrong about Trump,
But to to this jump to make this
this monumental thing,
it's it's clearly about the cool war clearly
about promoting their agendas and so on.
That's not even to get to the shooting
itself and what actually happened, but just realize
how kind of
I'll sinister, a lot of this is. And
for those of us just trying to find
the facts. It's
more... It's more difficult than I've I think
I've ever seen it at least my time
doing this right now.
So here's what we saw yesterday. I... We
were looking at this live. So it's being
sent to me,
A lot of them have already lead deleted
their tweets without even pointing to that. Glenn
World shared this breaking, and it's... Not none
of this is shared as this is a
potential know, or some of them were, but
the ones that were like this were very
clearly like the police have arrested this guy,
which didn't happen, not as far as I
can tell. Identified as Mark V. A known
antifa extremist.
He uploaded a video on Youtube before the
attack claiming, Justice was coming. Now that I
think there is a video that I saw
circulating. It's not worth getting into because this
appeared to be the guy. But it's simply
saying something about it. But it doesn't seem
to be related to Trump. It's it's it
might appear that way if you think this
was the guy. And who knows maybe it'll
swing back around, and it turns out this
was Guy what the point is they didn't
know that. They claimed it was the case
at a time when they certainly couldn't have
known that. This is what we need to
be on guard with. It's not just Republicans
or left. It's people who want to be
first.
This is a common tactic and by the
way, They have a right to do it.
No way should this be the argument that
they should be sensor because they're spreading misinformation,
whether they have blue check or not.
They have a right to say what they
want.
Or think
or lie to you. That's called free speech.
We just have to accept that reality and
be adults about it and move forward knowing
that might be happening. It's called discernment, The
the the people out there that wanna pretend
like you should be just know that if
you go this way and, you know Twitter
or elsewhere and the blue check, that means
it's gonna be verifying information.
Mean, it's it's just the most childish thing
in the world wildly naive
as if somebody couldn't then within the official
status, use that trust to mislead you. I
mean, even they know that. It's just about
agendas. My point is,
be careful. There a lot of people out
there knowing or and unknowingly misleading you.
Here's the the odd, she deleted it son
of a gun. I knew it. I knew
I should have grabbed this.
So here's what's funny. That was Laura Loom.
She deleted her tweet. Let me see if
I can grab it.
Perfect point for the show. I just wish
I woulda grabbed it. It was I it
was live 10 seconds ago.
And I, you know what I will do
I'm gonna grab the show really quickly from
yesterday if I can't bring this up because
this is an important point.
And I would tell you, this is, like
so funny that I make such a point
about her because she's such an egregious example.
Like Matt Wallace, the rest of these people
that are like, knowing g and manipulating you
and or and even worse in fact, maybe
they don't even know that. That's how bad
they are. But there's a lot of them
out there that are just the worst examples.
I mean, they are everything that the media
points at and pretends that we are.
And still, I argue to have a right
to do what they're doing. It's called free
speech,
but
let's do this.
I'm gonna grab this because I wanna make
this point. Here's our show from yesterday.
It's just hilarious to me. Oops. That's not
the 1.
I'd to add Trump shot there because I
want people to know that we were talking
about this.
Okay. So, yeah. He's, like, right when we
started the show, was, like somebody was telling
me this and it it's kind of like
a a dis joint show for that reason,
but I thought it was important to make
sure we were covering this.
So what basically we're gonna show you is
that the the clip that was shared...
Was... Well, it was loom pretending that the
person that was shot in the crowd
was the shooter,
and and and presenting it as such, and
that was not the case, at least as
there is right there.
Here we go Hold on. Get to it.
I thought it was.
Shoot.
Brad. It's right there.
So
it was it was a clip of a
person right here. There it is.
So it says watch. Law enforcement neutralized a
shooter at the Trump rally, who just tried
to assassinate Trump. Shooter believed to be dead.
Now, what she's doing is acting on half
information and trying to make it appear. If
she's breaking a story when the point was
that's coming from corporate media. They're reporting or
at least the the police level saying that
they had act. They got the shooter. Right?
Which is apparently the story, but at the
time that video she's showing of the person
being dragged, which I'll show you right now.
I wanna make sure you saw that that
was what she was posting.
Which she's now deleted, which means she's well
aware that it was false. Here's the video
that was being shown.
In,
and we're not sure exactly where those shots
came from at this point. We're trying to
figure it out. But to hear that and
then see the president fall down there on
that stage.
I can't put into words how shocking it
was to the peep... Okay. So this person
in the stands is the person they saw,
and you you'll see, Rogue. They they pick
him up by his arm and clearly the
person's dead, and they're they're kind of carrying
him away. Now this will be more... Remember
this because this becomes very relevant to when
I get into the angles of the shots
and what we're talking about here. Because frankly,
this does not add up. If where if
the person was shooting from where they claim
that guy was, and we know the sniper
from Trump's side was on his side, which
I'll show you all this. If you're not
know what I'm talking about.
If something doesn't add up, if he was
shot in the ear while he's facing the
other direction, I'll show you what I mean.
It just doesn't make any sense. And so
if this guy got, Shot, and that would
mean that the guy was shooting from the
roof that they claim. But Laura shared this
as if this guy was the shooter.
S Out if you're okay? What's going on?
Was he shot was he wounded? Then we
heard him on the microphone shannon say? There.
You can see right there. He kinda grabs
it by his arm and they're kinda like,
dragging this guy's body yes. Saying. Let me
grab my shoes as they tried to take
them off. So we're just trying to figure
out how what it happened gist a it.
Right? So again, the point is... Incomplete information,
try to dump the gun and they make
it look like you broke a story when
the reality, you don't know what's going on.
Great journalism, guys. So I recommend people doing
this, you just make sure you not imitate
that and do not rely on their fake
journalism
going forward
is people with million plus followers. Right?
And
Now this is the same conversation, and this
is what we kept seeing this guy, and
this 1 even deleted it.
Where it was... Oh, I think yeah yes.
They're all just deleting their tweets now. Right
Jesus is so frustrating. So this, this was...
I actually just popped up really quickly you
saw it right there. This was the Oa
overlap where they were still to this day,
even though they added the tweet away from
this, which is the 1 they were pointing
to,
They edited it to say, no, no. Now
it's it's not that picture, but it is
Mark Wireless, but no. Apparently, it's not. And
they're they're all deleting the tweets. Even now
even the last hour, This has all been
changing, which is why I'm frustrated because these
were there 30 seconds ago, should grabbed them.
But here is Wall Street Silver doing the
same thing, mark Wi.
And there... Oh, there there's a Laura Loom.
Oh, this is this is actually the tweet
I was talking about. Developing. Well, the police
Mark Violet as the shooter. That's O, Channel
Ryan.
Laura Loom retweeted it. Right? They're all just
this this it's this circle of of
partisan,
you know, Partisan
And and that, like, obviously, this is incorrect
information. But what I'm looking for is, like,
what I'm sure the word I'm looking for.
It's definitely drifting in my mind. Like, just
kind of sir everyone high fighting around a
certain circle of information, and no one's even
choose to verify this stuff. They're just pointing
at what they think is happening. And because
this account she said it, sir The lawyer's
is gonna share it because that she said
it, it must be true, and then wall
street silver, and it goes around and round
and round.
Without... With none of them actually taking the
time to go, is that actually true? Well
where is that coming from? What's the source
behind that? You know, journalism?
And then here's New York Post?
And this is what it said yesterday, and
I showed you this live on the show.
Well what's funny about this is we were
talking about this at the time when Mark
V thing was being shown to be false.
And we're going what they said it with
a Chinese man. So that's not even a
Chinese man. But again, even then I said,
well, let's be careful because that could still
be incorrect information. And guess what? Here they
are updating their post. Guess what? Shooter Identified
as only as a white male.
Okay? Look, that's the same paragraph. They didn't
change anything, but the Chinese men to white
man. Look.
And guess what? New York post didn't not
that anywhere. There's not an asterisk. Except now
this is auto shown you this many times
now. That's what they do now on all
these platforms. They just put a thing that
says updated July thirteenth and nowhere where does
it not take what they changed. That's not
how that's supposed to work. That's that is
a violation of journalist integrity. You're supposed to
be very clearly not here at at the
bottom. Usually what I would do with an
Asterisk and say, This has now been changed
to not take this and blah blah blah.
Nope. They just go updated, and that means
they can change whatever they want going forward
As many times they want, hey, it's been
updated.
That's ridiculous, guys. It's ridiculous. Now that... My
point being is but we should be questioning
whether that's even correct. Right? If everyone's just
jumping the gun and putting out information that
we can't verify,
corporate media included?
Very alarming.
Here's corporate media doing the same thing. Secret
service, Russia's Trump offs 8 jeffrey falls at
rally. I mean, how stupid.
Look, let's be clear. You can clearly see
blood on the picture that they're using.
And that's not... Whether or not you think...
It's manipulated whatever. It's not... To say he
falls is a ridiculous thing to do. Even
if you will acting on it on incomplete
information. Same thing on this platform. Russia's off
stage after following it rally. Like, it just...
They don't want to talk about this. They
don't what... That's just petty stuff right there.
Here's washington a post. Who did change it
not long after it, but Trump rushed off
stage after loud noises.
Loud noises. I mean,
obviously, it's more than that. Now you clearly,
you can see... You have to say gunshots,
but clearly, it's not what they're framing it
as. Now they updated it to say,
loud pops.
It's just so stupid. This is corporate media
for you, and I... That's why David, but
I call them mainstream alternative media because they're
doing this same damn thing. Now here's what
Trump said on his trump... A true social
account, and then we're gonna get into the
actual details, shooting angles and all the different
things that I think show you some very
interesting stuff. Now keeping this in mind going
through here,
a lot of people on the right especially
are calling for the secret service ahead of
them to resign, which... And it whether or
not you...
Whatever you think about this, I... I... In
fact, I would agree. I mean, like, we're
talking about a situation where whatever the case,
they're either involved or incompetent.
Or it's all completely ar made up, and
it's to benefit Trump. Either way,
they're violating what they should be doing. The
point is, He says, I wanna thank the
United States secret service and all the law
enforcement and their rapid response on the shooting,
which doesn't vary... I mean, we'll go through
it. You tell me if this looks like
what you would expect a rapid response from
the secret service. To me it feels like
that's the biggest example if there's something off
here, Like pretty much everyone's pointing out.
Most importantly says I want to extend my
condolences as the family of the person the
rally who was killed and also the family
of another person that was badly injured, which
I haven't seen any...
Images or information around yet. It is incredible...
It it is incredible that such an act
can take place in our country, nothing is
known at the time about the shooter who
is now dead, which This was posted yesterday
at 07:42PM.
Now, at that time, there was already information
circulating about who this person was. So it's
funny that he says that. It's says I
was shot with with a bullet that pierced
the upper part of my right ear. Now
let's look at that when we go through
this. Frankly,
that's 1 of the parts that made me
a little yesterday show. The images of his
ear...
I just doesn't look like what we'll I'll
we'll go away till we look at it.
It's so I knew immediately something was wrong
in that I... In that I heard a
whiz sound.
And immediately felt the bullet ripped through my
skin.
Much bleeding took place, so I realized that
that was happening. Now the blood is also
an interesting part about it. Seeing how the
image images seemed to show that there's no
blood that got in his collar, which seems
pretty odd,
and let's go through that. Oh, and there
was... A he also posted this.
I didn't see this 1. 0, Melania, Trump
making a comment.
And he simply asked that saying, thank you,
everyone. Who with thoughts and prayers yesterday as
it was... Auto alone who prevented me the
unthinkable from happening.
I always I feel obligated to point out
that Donald Trump himself is acknowledged in past
these books in the past.
Or, you know, it just and I think
more than once an abstract way that he
essentially leaned to the religious side of this
because he was running as a conservative.
That historically, I believe the arguments are that
he's an atheist.
But I'm sure everyone... Oh, he changed. Now
he thinks differently certainly possible.
Or we can realize that he's is written
about how he adapts and pretends to be
certain things for certain deals. And, yeah, that's
what this is. Guys. I I mean, if
we can't see by now that Trump is
playing the role and you... And that's exactly
why I point out the partisan ship
can, you know, Trump's logic. No pun intended.
So this
It's just the, I think, you know, that's,
you know, God saved us because a lot
of people right now are leaning into that.
And we'll even get into a very weird
prophetic overlap.
Somebody who seemed to have predicted exactly this
back in March. And saying that he's a...
Like this and Trump himself himself called himself
the chosen 1 on an interview, is Real,
says the same thing. Weird. But it says,
we will not... We will fear not, but
instead remain resilient in our faith and defiant
in the face of wicked ness.
Our love goes out again, that's usually not
not the shooter in general, but I think
the general sentiment is that, you know, they're
fighting the democrats, and that's the good... You
know, the light versus, the dark, evil versus
the good, It which just typical, how they
frame these things.
Our love goes out to the other victims,
their families, we pray for the recovery of
those who are wounded and hold their heart
the memory of the citizen who was horribly
killed.
It says, show our true characters, Americans remaining
strong and determined and not allowing evil to
win. I truly love our country and love
you all. Look forward to speaking the great
nation from Wisconsin.
People always point out that there's somehow like,
a meaning in the capitals that he uses
occasionally. This is whole queue. I don't overlap,
I just wanna to point that out. Everybody
will read into things they want to read
into.
We can't see by now the queue. I
don't think was a complete scam, then again,
you don't wanna see it. But that being
said, let's talk about the actual facts around
this. Now, yesterday,
Abc reported through Olivia Reuben count, the shooter
at the Trump rally is dead and though
is 1 by.
Now the d district attorney, Gold also says
there was possibly a second. Now what their
reports are now saying is that that 1
was shot behind him, and there was another
person also shot,
but he didn't die is what they're saying
now today.
Now the timing of all list just doesn't
make much sense to me. Now it looks
at I... It's hard to tell if there
was 8 or 9 shots that fired off
or if there was echoes involved,
but
how is it that only 1 person or
2 people were shot.
Or even though I mean, you you'll see
what I mean when we go through this.
It's it doesn't seem to add up, but
certainly possible though. These are just, you know,
not necessarily that it proves, but... It's things
can happen that don't seem like they should.
Right? But it's 1 data point that you
go, okay.
It doesn't seem to add up. Let's watch
this as the una edited part got the
whole thing, but the part that really is
important. Let's take a look at this. Shared
by autism capital.
Well, wanna we really see something that said,
take a look at what happened. Okay. So
what I wanna show you... Actually really quickly.
Let me do this real quick.
Before we play that entire thing, here is
the shot of where we're here? Okay. So
this is
where Trump was doing the rally,
This is where this guy was. Remember, There
are people all around here partying, many of
which tried to get their attention to secret
service, and like, I'll show you the video
we showed it yesterday.
Going... There's a guy with the gun on
the roof, apparently doing that for a long
time, and nobody did anything about it. That's
what that's what they're saying. And there's more
than 1 witness saying that. And now we
do actually have a video like, I knew
there would be of somebody that was there
which adds to it. We'll get to that
a second.
The point is,
they're shooting at him here. He's facing
Generally that direction. Right? And now here, back
to the video.
So before you hit the shot, So he's
facing...
Be standing out the stage facing the right
right now. Okay?
Now behind him,
as we'll show you in a second or
kind of, like,
more
2 hit... Target I don't know if he
use anybody. So if he's facing the stage,
He's looking to his right. So sort of
to his right behind him is where his
snipers are or the, you know, Us government
snipers are. So he's facing to the right
right now. Where to believe that the shooter
is
outward from him. Across the way. Right? So
straight out, you know, he's looking at the
right. It's in front of him.
So if he's turned to the right when
that first shot fires off, how exactly did
it hit his right ear?
I find that to be strange Unless I'm
missing something.
Take a look at what happened.
Right there, but he grabs ear. Okay?
1 2 shots.
He falls down.
That could 8 or 9 depending what there
was an echo with 1 of them.
Now in my opinion the way that this
all went down, doesn't make much sense to
weigh the sequel at least the way we're
told the secret service are supposed to be
acting.
Well, what that... Now that 1 is an
anomaly to me.
Now
some people would argue that's when they shot
the shooter, but the... We'll... I'm gonna show
you when the sniper on the roof reacted,
which was near the same time the first
shot was rang off.
So what is that last shot then? What
does that mean?
And there's also discussions about this guy he
just ran up,
being the 1 that actually shot him, but
I don't believe that to be the case.
Almost
When we're gonna get what he says here
in general, you can't hear a lot some
of it. He says, like, let me get
my shoes, which I find interesting. But then
he he says, like, wait, wait wait. I'll
show you that in a second. I think
that might be next, which I think is
relevant.
But so, basically,
They say the shooter been neutralized. I'll play
that 1 for you too,
then I let them stand up.
Okay. So there's a time when
there's no way they could know for sure
what's going on. This is not protocol. You
understand. Like the point is you act as
if we don't... The situation is not secure.
There's no possible way they could have secured
the situation.
There are people in the crowd the people
everywhere. So they don't know who's involved. Usually
what you would do in this case first,
like the way they did the dive on
him, cover him from all angles and then
rush him out of the way as fast
as possible and they know they've got a
clear line to the car.
Not let him stand up, stick his head
up, put up an arm in the air.
Doesn't make much sense to me, guys. Not
from it not from a a
secret service perspective or a general protection discussion.
Not ride the this money by the way.
Look, you see behind these guys you've got
this guy. Know if I can zoom in
on this for you guys, But if you
look behind him,
there's a lot of fun... There's this not
this means anything. I just think it's interesting.
So right now, with people in the crowd,
of the mind that they're shooting going on,
which is clearly what seems to be. And
there's plenty... There's a guy right behind him
and just looking at his phone standing straight
up. I just think that's Larry like, no
concern what's going on. I just think strange
to me.
You a lot of them. Interesting me.
K. Now the this still laying on compliment,
behind the podium.
Now guy right here.
The guy... The gun the guy stayed on
the stage in front of the podium to
to the right, you know, we're all in
black with his gun. That's what peep... Some
people are arguing was the 1 that shot.
I think it was Don't we'll get you
in a second saying he's a hero. He's
the 1 that saved today, which I don't
even know how that makes sense. But certainly
could be, but I'll I'll show you how
that contradicts the other information.
Okay.
It's hand up with him.
The guy with the gray hat right there
in the back Like, she funny to be.
He's just scrolling his phone. Standing straight up.
Okay.
Right here.
Issues. That doesn't even that right there seem
a little bit inconsistent, like,
there's supposed to be a shooter going on.
Yeah, They they say they shot the guy.
But right now, you just completely lot opened
up the line of sight to where that
was coming from.
That seems odd to me.
Now it seems there seemed like more interested
in covering this base with it with his
arms
The right hand just gonna hear it.
He's said wait we wait.
I'll play a second. And then he does
the the famous hand in the air.
Now that 1 right here where doesn't get
next to 1
from the downward angle. Now here's what's interesting
to me.
You're telling me that
there's an assassination attempt going on.
And you're and you're just... They're you're letting
people run up and take shots of him.
I mean, this that just does not add
up from a security perspective, which could either
suggest that as many people are, you know,
proposing,
this was the secret service that might have
been involved, like a Jfk overlap. Right?
Poor,
they're just incompetent
or this was a manufactured event to benefit
trump. First the 3 that seemed most likely
to me. You can decide for yourselves all
over possible.
But I just don't see how you logically
argue that this is what they would do,
knowing that there's an event going on. I
mean, again, we'll show you the clip of
people in the crowd saying that there's 2
shooters.
Could just be that they were hearing the
other snipers and thought that might have been
another the shooter. Like, it's never the right
move to just blindly take a random news
interview on the side of the road with
some random person be lying. They could be
misinformed. It just... But it's included it. Think
about it. So right there, The famous shot
is from down below him. Right?
From a camp front person with a camera.
I just don't think that makes sense. They
would be more they would be...
Completely surrounding him covering him, running into the
car.
Yeah. That's a good point, Jack.
Play this out real quick.
No. You know, things they run the car
I now him. Right? It's just it seem
makes much sense for me.
Right there. Right? You're gonna wanna do that?
Like, just you understand. Like, yes, he's the
president. And, yes, they take his orders from
it, but at this moment in time when
these kind of things happen, the secret service
have a mandate. Like, the point is your
life is what we're here to protect.
No, yes. It doesn't mean that they always
do it and everyone's the same, but the
reality is what we're supposed to understand is
that they're they're supposed to be... There is
no conversation at this point. They're supposed to
be on him in the car. They wouldn't
let him stand up and stick his head
up while they know there might be a
shooter out there. I know I've said... Just...
I need... I wanna you guys to make
sure you hear that because that to me
is a big point, and it and it
would suggest the secret service is incompetent or
included.
Suggest, not proven.
You hit the guy right there?
No.
Alright.
So what or pointing out by the way.
And so right here, let's realize. So we're
here he isn't the stand or in in
the podium. Right?
And so somebody got shot right behind. At
released that the the I... The argument is
that they were shooting an him and it
missed him and hit somebody in the crowd.
Right? So where is that?
You know, where where are you
Reaction in the crowd?
Doesn't just because we can't see it everything
is not there. That's it's a good point.
Right? Wouldn't there be a very identifiable example
somebody in the crowd, like people screaming and
moving out. Yeah. My argument would be is
it not a dead body in the skin
the day in the stadium, people would pull
back from it. You would see, like a
noticeable like, you know, that's what I would
think.
Yeah.
Still be right there behind. I just I
know That doesn't went up for you guys.
Okay. So let's let's go from that.
So here,
Oh, this 1 is the...
Is that the 1 that see?
Make sure it's the right 1.
Did I get done?
Oh, yeah. Okay. It's right here. So here
is just so you can hear them and
say, wait.
Wait Wait wait.
It's really low. But if you turn your
volume up the right there. He's wait. Wait.
Wait. Wait.
Again,
same point.
It... To me, that's... I mean, they're they're
not supposed to be like, oh, okay. Go
ahead. We'll hold on for second. In peak
of the moment when you think he's being
attacked. Right? You're stomach you stood up now.
And at this point, they've said the shooter
has been comp. He's been tight taken out,
but you don't know what else is going
on. And you didn't go wait. Wait. Here...
III want a photo opportunity. Right? Now, you
know, it doesn't matter if you think it's
just because, you know, he's trying to say,
I survived and support me. It's course. You
know, it's it that will benefit him. He
knows that. I'm not saying anything wrong with
that. My point is that the secret service
would not have allowed that.
The stick had outs stand up and, know,
and wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. It kinda to
me if you think this was something that
was staged,
that would be a point the 6 out.
To say, hold on. Hold on I so
this is what we're, you know, that's... This
is the thing we're doing this for.
But it's up to you decide side. I,
again, I'm not saying I even think that's
most likely or that I'm lean... I'll as
we go through more towards the end, I'll
tell you for clear... For sure what I
think makes makes most sense. Before I wanna
make sure you see all this before I
put my opinion on top it, But I
definitely think you get the sense of, you
know, I'm very skeptical about a lot of
stuff here.
They were expanding there.
Nah.
Doesn't seem to make sense to me.
So
here,
the footage shows the crowd spotting the shooter
before the secret service take action. Now, this
is hard... It's just a... It's more sound
than anything else, But this important because we
have multiple data points around this. And we'll
go watch, and we'll show you the actual
shots oven him before during and after of
this person on the roof.
But remember that... It we'll show you that
video again from the guy that was interviewed.
That said, we were trying to tell everybody.
We said there's a guy up there with
the gun. Like... And and as we get
into the shooter on the other side from
Trump's side, it certainly does not make sense.
All that's showing you is that they were
screaming. He's got a gun from the crowd
before
the shots took off.
So even people on the ground were like,
hey. As you see that, and you tell
me that snipers and securities and that that
nobody else was able to see what the
crowd was pointing out.
Certainly doesn't add up to me.
Now here
is the video of the guy killed on
the roof.
First, and we'll we'll kind of go backward
from here. So this is
Taylor Hanson saying 1 of the shooters has
been confirmed dead, 1 of the shooters, a
possible second shooter in custody.
Where is that coming from?
III don't know. This this is a reporter
for
tenant media. I'm not familiar,
but that it doesn't seem to be at
least with the
main conversation is saying now. But, you know,
question everything certainly possible.
Usually, when there's more of a manipulated event,
there tends to be more the 1 going
on. But
I think it's important to recognize that the
data as a whole right now seems to
be showing that there was the 1 shooter
and a multiple people shot.
But if we're talking about second shooter, I
think it seems to more more sense to
to bring in the overlap between his snipers
as well. We'll get to that. Here,
Is them just highlighting it and far away?
You can see the guy. What's that's
If I think they hit him from the
guy is
Just laying on the roof right there. So
here's the point. Look how obvious that it's
more the standing.
Everybody was pointing this out before this took
place.
Very clear.
Here they are on the roof, dealing with
it.
Right? There's there's the police and the... Whatever
the military
up there, removing the guy.
And we'll get into pardon me. There's a...
It's a graphic picture. We'll show that right
now. So it heads up.
This is the person that they shot up
there.
National Files says alleged would be assassinated of
Donald Trump. Now it's important. I know it's
graphic, but the point is his ear and
different overlaps. We're gonna compare this to the
person they're claiming it is.
I... It's obvious there's in inconsistencies here. It
doesn't really line up for me. But keep
keeping this in mind, we'll come back to
it.
Here is
the audio of them simply saying shoot or
down. Lot of these just data points that
may be more relevant as this goes forward.
K. Now the timing is important. See There's
that guy on the to the right of
the podium that they other people are claiming
was the 1 that shot him. Right?
So at this point,
a lot has taken place
in regard to the other people, like, I...
To my point is, I'm gonna show you
this next in regard to his shooters in
the time when they shoot.
Very clearly, you can see that the Us
government sniper react.
Before the first shot is fired or right
at the same time? So why would it
take this long for that to be said?
We're good. Shoot down let's go.
Now yes, it said I stand him up,
which is important.
But I... You're gonna see why I don't
think this really lines up.
Now first, here is the video we played
yesterday.
And then again, this was played from this
account yesterday long before this was being shared
everywhere else. Always important to highlight our value
to breaking information early.
Now this is important.
Again, this is a random guy. You don't
know what he's in motives czar his intentions
or gonna or at this is all stage.
You knows. Always question everything. But taking it
at face value,
and it is backed up by other people
and there is other video We'll show you
after this that does in fact get a
shot of the guy up there before they
shot him.
This is important because his main point is
that he tried to tell them and nobody
seemed to care.
It was here you weren't inside the event.
No, but you were just outside, tell us
what yes or what.
So
we had a party either here all day
too, and then you can see behind us.
At the the brick farming greenhouse here. We
had a party.
And we all decided, hey, you know, when
when me hear, Trump up there, we're gonna
walk up through the field,
stand by the trees out there into the
shade. Yeah. And watch should right listen to
the rally. Right? We couldn't see him but
we could hear him.
So we walked up and probably
5 to 7 minutes
of trump speaking, I'm estimating here I have
no idea, you know. But
we noticed the guy crawling
aren't, you know, bear and not the roof
of the building beside us, 50 50 feet
away from us.
So we're standing an there. You know, we're
pointing we're pointing that the guy, crawling up
the roof, and he had a gun. Right?
He had a rifle. To get clear to
see him with the rifle.
Absolutely.
We're pointing out them. The police are down
there, running around on the ground. We're like,
hey. Man, just guy on the roof for
the rifle.
And the police were I call what? You
know? Like, like, they didn't know what going
on.
If you... We were already showed you the
There there there are people standing there, drinking
their beers, and you can clearly see a
guy though. I don't care whether you think
he hasn't a good or not. A guy
on the roof like that would be hugely
noticeable
And, I mean, from the Secret service perspective
or police, it... That's immediately something that gets
known. If everyone knows about it. We have
deal with this guy, time out. There's something
going on, whether or not he has a
gun because he's in a position where something
could be done.
And you're telling me that he's telling the
police that there's a guy and they're like,
what? What? You mean the guy right there
that we can see as I'm pointing at
and you're confused. That doesn't seem make sense
unless he's not telling the truth or he's
confused or he's mis remembering.
You know, we're like, hey, right here on
the roof. We can see him from right
here. We see him. This is nobody's he's
crawling.
And
Next thing, you know? I'm like, I'm thinking
myself I'm like, why is Trump still speaking?
Why have they not pulled him up the
stage. I'm staying there playing at him for,
you know, 2 or 3 minutes?
Okay. So if he's correct in this... And,
yeah, I would agree in the. I, something...
This
gut feeling appears to feel like it's accurate,
but that's never the good thing, you know,
considered that. Got I trust my gut more
than anything, but still know that doesn't mean
It's absolutely true.
But
the 2 minute time frame. Right? So here
we are where he's saying, I see a
guy with a gun.
Not saying a guy. Telling the police secret
service, I see a guy with a gun.
Minutes go by and he's still speaking?
There's no way that adds up.
Secret service is looking at us from the
top of the barn. I'm pointing at that
roof.
Just standard it like this.
And next thing you know, by child training
out so you'll you're almost sudden with the
shots came. That might be relevant as well.
Now it's still it's hard to tell whether
we're talking about echoes or whatever. But he
says 5 shots ring out.
So if we're talking about 8 or possibly
9,
that is interesting.
But what is that? How do we account
for the others?
If as I'm gonna show you next, you
can see his Trump sniper fire or respond,
it right in the same moment.
So keep that in mind.
Nut on hundred percent. Hundred percent, and he
he was
where the schultz came from Nut on hundred
percent. Hundred percent, and he he was up
there for a couple of minutes. He was
up there were not there for a couple
of minutes. Absolutely. At least 3 4 minutes
and he was heading yep, police in the
secret. We were telling the police we are
pointing at him for the secret service who
were looking at us from the top of
the barn. They were looking at us a
whole time when stand about that tree. The
page oc,
if they see? Probably not. Because the width,
the way that this slope when, he was
behind where they could see. But but why
is there not super service on all of
these words here. Mh.
Or the their obvious question is why was
this not secured beforehand is the 1 of
the only buildings on a visual path to
this the stage.
Beforehand.
This is not a big place
Did you see... I mean, obviously, everyone, when
the shooting started everyone was... Sorry panic. Did
you see what I'm saying name at all?
Oh, yeah. Blew setup.
Okay. Sorry Secret search blue setup okay. Just
be checklist because well what we done... They're
talking about the shooter. Well, clearly, that's not
what the picture shows.
You know, or maybe he's just saying that
as a, you know, kind of a eu,
but the point is they they saying they
shot the shooter. Funny Was watching. But give
you your pretty sure they shot the guy.
Absolutely.
Okay. Yep. You you saw that happening. Yep.
Yep. Okay. Fine Yep. And did you see
them go up to him afterwards door the
walls? They... Yeah. They crawled up on the
roof. They had their guns pointed out and
make sure he was dead. He was dead.
That was it? It was ever.
It's incredible. Yeah. I was on the roof
right there. You can see the white roof
right that you gotta look him. Because you...
I I... No other than he was in
muted colors, hand type clothing.
We saw the rifle fooling around as he
was trying to crawl, I mean, we saw
a rifle hundred percent. You... I mean, do
you know about? You know kind of weapon
it will absolutely? No comments. For sure. You
know. I mean there is a rifle of
some sort? I wouldn't know, you know. Wasn't
close enough to read the label on industrial.
But I might be to. There was a
rifle for or some sort. Yeah. Absolutely.
So I What do you... How do you
process before you just seen?
I I don't know what's to say, man.
I tell you is, you know,
if I if I walked up closer there
with anything that can keep your service considered
a, a problem,
I wouldn't be saying her talking to you
right now. But I don't know why a
guy that we're standing their point now to
police and secret service
is crawling up the roof. Mh.
Security.
Yes. We're right there by that treaty.
We were outside the security.
But
my question Oh. So the... I I think
what the question was were you outside the
securities I mean, but it... It doesn't matter.
Right the point is if you're in a
situation like this, they would secure the only
highs point. That could see down on the
stage. That's just no way around it. And
as I understand it, we're talking, like, a
hundred and 30 meters
for... And these are from, like, expert opinions
based on the time for, like, from the
shot in general, but also the building is
easy to know where that building is in
regard to how far away it is. Which
as I understand it despite what some people
are saying from a Sniper perspective or a
shooter that's in in any way
practiced, then it's not a hard shot.
And is
there's only a few buildings around here. Why
is secret service not every building here? There's
was a whole bunch of questions. I think
they're gonna come. There's a whole bunch of
questions.
Yeah.
Horse. Yes. She was right in front. I
don't know why she asked about Trump's supporter
on a horse, which is what she said
with the flag. I'm not sure what that
relevance was. She kept on back before it's
right in front of me. Yes.
That about
I mean, nice orders. Nice. Lady running with
a flag. Because seem very,
you know, patriotic. But what what's what's significance
of the... No. She's just... He asked make
Saw a say. Okay. Yeah. What... I mean,
that's... What does that have to do with
anything?
Why would that person ask that? I don't
know, actually? Maybe there's just a bad reporter.
I don't know. Listen. I'm sorry you had
to witness that Was a terrible thing.
And you stay safe with you other the
family.
So...
Now here, Ian and Carroll pointed this out
today. Yeah, yeah late yesterday, and this the
same thing I was saying. He said, so
first, let's remember, and of course, this this
post is now gone. This is rampant, guys.
These people are constantly dumping things online and
saying proven this and that and then deleting
them and not pointing that out. He says,
let's first remember patience while we sift through
information. Take your time, but this dude didn't
have a phone.
He couldn't... He couldn't... He could see a
shooter climbing up to the roof with the
rifle and no 1 took cell video. Remember
the op might be more complicated than you
think.
And I, that and that's what I simply
said in response to that.
Simply pointing out.
The... This is what we were talking about
yesterday, and it might... It might still come
out, but I find it very hard to
believe that no 1 there filmed this. That
was my point during our show yesterday.
And turns out that somebody did. Do me
why do awake media shared this? I believe
it was from oh, Tmz. You can see
at the background. So what you're seeing here,
which is crazy to me. And this is
even more... The look at the picture of
that guy.
I don't think that looks like the other
pictures we're gonna show you of the people.
They're claiming this person was. The care color
seems different, but we'll get to that in
a second. Either way, this is the person.
So somebody is literally taking a shot of
this guy before all of this.
See just how many people clearly were identifying
a shooter on the roof. And nobody did
anything about it. A lot of things that
could add up to, but clearly, there's something
more going on here. Now here's the video
at the bottom. I'll play this for you
now where it shows
them kind of talking about this as he's
laying there and yelling. There's a guy and
watch out and same point.
Nobody's he's turning this way
Well, here's what's interesting.
We just heard shots. Am I wrong?
Nobody's he's turning this way.
Right there.
Yeah. I mean, unless there's something going on,
fire. I mean, those are 3 or 4
pops are right there.
And if you liked this whole thing that's
only in 1 series. 8 or so even
a wrote. Right?
So that would mean that he just got
shot or somebody shot or he shot.
The same thing. If there's only 1 series
of these shootings and then 1 trailing afterward,
You got shot in that process.
There.
Right.
Here's the guy
that.
Nobody's he's turning this way. He can Turning
away. Now again, he could be wrong about
that.
But he saying he's turning this way. Remember,
the top 1 still, the bottom half is
the video.
Okay. So that last shot appears to be
the 1,
that got him. Based on what this video
shows where you can always down. That's them
saying that. After that last shot that trail
after the series of them in the first
place, which I'm gonna show you is very
inconsistent or it doesn't really make sense. Why
the sniper who was looking at him from
the roof on trump's side who acted did
not shoot this guy.
At least not.
Dude. That's exactly why we need Fucking Trump
here.
Oh
Shit. Yeah. They're under undercover.
And realize keep the service?
That's him. They have off the race
authorization to to shoot to kill immediately. Right?
They're... There's not some like idea where they
have to wait to be fired at or,
you know, or, like, have their safe on.
I mean, these people trained to immediately respond
if there's a threat.
That's important to think about. Okay. So the
point from here is that clearly in the
start of this video, you can see with
the top shot, the guy's there, knee, aiming
a gun. Okay? Then you hear shots fire
off, and the guy's going up. He's turning
this way.
And then that last pop fires then they
go up, they got him. Very relevant to
this next point.
Keep here. Hold on.
Well I keep saying this next point, but
I want... Yeah. This is I I wanna
make sure... Now it's it's good. I'm gonna
trail with this 1 next We'll I'll come
back. There's another guy talking about seeing things.
Let's do this first.
So this,
there's a lot of it has the same
information, the same can other posts and so
on.
And this 1 too, saying this is the
guy. Let's not at released according to everybody,
you know, the information circulating.
Okay. This is fantastically stupid.
So check this out.
This is the whole point. So get... It's
not even the guy's right name apparently.
If this is correct. You know, these fact
checks on Twitter can be notoriously wrong.
That doesn't look like him.
Oh yeah? Sure enough.
Okay. So check this out.
So this
is apparently a guy named Marco Viola V,
a football based Youtuber in rome.
Not Mark whatever they called him and not
an Deep member and not... Like, it's just
ridiculous and all of these people this guy
included are sharing this saying Mark V was
antifa member, and they shot him.
Almost every large republican account this was immediately
talking about this was sharing this in this
video of him going pop pop. Saying, oh,
they posted a video about He's gonna shoot
trump.
Apparently not. Apparently it's not even the right
guy from the right place in the right
member and the video about something else.
Caution guys. There are people that are not
they're are intentionally misleading you and those that
are just too
irresponsible that for misleading you on some that
are just too stupid to know. But the
point here,
Is this video,
which has been posted from a lot of
different angles is very important in this conversation.
So let's play this next.
And you... Okay. So here, remember we talked
about the first place. So here's Trump on
the stage, right, on the right.
So across the field,
across the state a field
from where he's facing is where the guy
was shooting. Right? Extent described from every angle.
So my point is to his right
Trump's right is where you can see those
snipers on the roof,
protecting him.
They're looking right at the shooter. They're looking
exactly in the direction of where that guy
was.
And this is before it happened.
And then Remember Trump turns to his right
and get... That's when the shots are fired
and somehow they hit his right ear.
How would that even possibly make sense?
Here here and at lunch. I'm gonna play
this 1 again actually so you can see
that.
See something. There he is. Facing his right.
As he just showed you, his snipers are
too his right, he's facing the right. His
right ear is what got shot.
I think this said, take a look at
what happened.
Grab mirror. How in the world does that
make sense? Now, maybe a second shooter. Maybe
that's why that comes in, But the narrative
we're getting right now does not line up
at all.
How was his right ears shot if he
is facing the right when the snip maybe
1 of his sniper shot him. I don't
know, hey Instagram sends our show. Every single
time. I know I say every time maybe
you guys don't like it, but I think
it's funny because it's every show. But
that does not line up for me. Now
back to this,
Here.
Sorry. It's freezing on me. So he's giving
his speech,
and this is right when this this is
right before the shots start to happen. Now
pay attention to his sniper.
It either appears that that guy fired first
or he reacted at the same time? If
that's the case, then why was it this
9 shot way after the other 8 that
actually killed the guy court people that were
right next to him. What Old and if
you wanna really see something to said, Take
a look at what. Okay. He picks his
head up,
the sniper picks his head up,
which I find strange and then seems to
fire or at least react
after he does that?
Take a look at what happens.
See that?
How in the world does that make sense
for very reverse sniper. Why would you pick
your head up away from the scope.
And then, like, reactive fire at the same
time you're putting your head back down. That
seems pretty strange to me. I'm not a
sniper, but, I mean, it's kinda basic. Isn't
it watch?
I really see something this said. Take a
look at what happens.
Okay. Clearly, he did something right there. Now
there are people arguing doing that these are
the only shots that were fired.
And you can pretty much line it up
with his movements. That was 1.
There's 02/02/2405
6 7. Much tired after that. 45678.
But my point is this guy clearly fired
at least first or at the same time.
So why was this guy did he miss?
And that's the case. Why wasn't this immediately
radio in or the bigger point? If he's
staring right at the guy didn't even have
to move his scope How did he not
see the guy on the roof with a
gun?
There's just no way that makes any sense?
And, you know that's a little bit all
george that george a couple of months old.
And if you wanna really see something that
said, take a look at what happens.
Now right there, they continue to fire, but
Trump's already down. Right? So maybe that's them
firing it in. I, I don't know, but
it's... It's all of it doesn't... None of
this really seems to add up.
So here's is the other 1J6
video shared this, and this just goes further
back. Simply showing you 42 seconds. It says
the this the counters snip didn't take the
shot at the at the shooter sniper. He's
claiming, they were looking at him at least
42 seconds before the ears shot on Donald
Trump, and they're... So they're claiming that they
just didn't do anything and if they missed
it, which is certainly 1 of the possibilities.
That says did the Cia do an inside
job with Thomas Matthew Crooks?
If that's even the guy, we'll get to
that in a second. Here's their video.
7 minutes and 21 seconds before the shot.
So look at them standing there, guys with
their bin vernacular
looking in the exact location.
So 7 minutes. Right? So if we pace
it on what the guy said, which is
2 minutes or so
that they said it. Look, look, look a
guy with a gun, minutes go by and
nobody did anything and then he finally fired.
So that's within this timeframe frame where they're
looking either through their scope or with their
bin vernacular at the exact... Location or at
least in the general direction. My point is
though you can line this up with exactly
where they were at.
That's when I left office. That was the
Night... It's fuzzy, but now you're back to
the point that we just showed you. Now
they're on their scope looking directly over. Lowest
point and that comes right from the
government services
comes right out of border patrol. Take a
look at that. So that arrow is the
lowest
amount of illegal
immigration ever in recorded history into our country.
And then
The reason this is important is they're showing.
This entire time. They're looking through their scope
at the exact location. And then the worst
president in the history of our country took
over,
and look what happened to our country,
probably 20000000 people.
Right And you know, that's a little bit
old that chart that charts, a couple of
months old. And if you wanna really see
something that said, take a look at what
happened over.
There you go.
Now with this 1 was... Let me see.
Oh, I think I just had this here
because the same point about the way he's
spacing. Right? So look, the same point. Just
used the other video to make the point.
He's facing to the right when that happens.
I still think that's 1 of the most
relevant points right now. How did he get
shot his right ear from a guy that's
directly in front of him across the way
while he's facing the right.
That either means that we're somebody else in
the crowd, to is right, 1 of their
snipers or it wasn't even a real shot.
And there's something else going on, which we'll
get to in a minute. Certainly people are
arguing that. That this was a a
event. But I... I find that really hard
to believe with what we're looking at, but
it's certainly possible. I the only reason I'm
saying that is because there's a lot of
people around. A lot of people seeing what's
going on, you know, but that's never a
reason to dismiss something as possible. Right? Clearly,
There's
inconsistency here. And that could be... It's just
as likely that this was out of something
that was manufactured for their own benefit or
that was carried out by somebody else outside
of this or that they were involved. I
mean, always these are very possible. Like, limp
it this way. If you're if you're considering
the reality or the possibility rather that this
might have been an internal thing or the
secret service were involved? They wanted to take
them out?
Why then would you dismiss the possibility that
Trump's campaign might have done this to benefit
themselves?
That's like the same conversation in a different
extreme. They're both just as likely. They're both
considered conspiracy theory. Right? But it's because partisan.
Right? But from a non part perspective when
we're not breaking our logic for our own
party side, they're all possible, and they both
seem just as likely.
But to go back to this, here's another
guy. He sensor news shared this. Alan, by
the way, I wanna make sure I shout
them out. He censored news,
and or, in general Have I've been sending
a lot of important stuff, and Really thank
them for the work they did over yesterday
to today, finding a lot of important information
that they to me. So just make, if
you're not following these censored news or or
will I recommend that you do. They're doing
great work. These under news highlights this in
man, and I think what they're saying is
it's for this not really anybody's been highlighting
the person's name.
Ben Mace says that he was up at
the fence line
at the Trump rally today is saw the
alleged shooter, quote, move from roof to roof.
He says.
Interesting, which in my opinion only makes it
all the more obvious, cons.
And says reported it to police officers. Now
they have 2 separate people
well before telling police officers, there was a
shooter on the roof. There's no. There's no
confusing this, guys. He says he then found
a better vantage point went back and told
the officer. Again,
that if he goes back to that particular
spot, he can see the person figuring that
he would go on the radio, which they
would, if this was an honest situation.
Or if this guy is maybe be telling
the truth. You know, it's I consider everything.
It says, quote, and when I turned around
to go back, when I was I was
in
to where I was is when the guns
start shooting. So he told him well beforehand.
Then there were 2 officers that were were
actively
searching. Said you can tell they were searching
for looking for somebody. They tried helping then
they... The... Where the guy was. I didn't
have to look
didn't did not have a good look at
him. I just III just seen him going
from 1 building to another.
He estimates 220 50 yards away, which I'm
not the exact math, but a hundred and
30 meters that's definitely more than on 30
yards but I forget the breakdown. But generally
speaking, I think the actual is like a
hundred 30 meters to where it from how
far it was. Here's this video.
A gentleman who was along the fence line.
Just I'm just meeting him right now, sir,
thank you so much. You're talking to Kd
k. Can I have your name and what
did you see in here? There's was Ben
Mace.
I was at the same point, that probably
the witness you were talking to earlier.
I was up at the fence line.
Saw
the guy
move from roof to roof. Talked told an
officer that he was on the roof.
The officer come logan and I went back
to.
Heard that there was
somebody that could see the person. So I
went back to where they were standing,
saw the person went back and told the
officer again that
if he goes back to that particular spot.
He can see the person, figuring that he
would go in radio,
And when I turned around to go back
to where I was is when the gunshots
started, and
then it was just chaos, and we all
came running away, and
that was that was that. Oh, let me
get this right. So you actually saw the
man on top of the roof behind us.
Yes.
And you're saying people reported that to law
enforcement saying there a man on the roof
of the building? Yes. There were 2
2 officers that were actively
certain... You could tell they were searching and
looking for somebody.
And we just tried to help and tell
him where the guy was
and
they
at some point, somebody
obviously found them or the snipers found them
and
that was the end of his
decisions. Did you get a good look at
the guy on the roof? I did not
have a good look at him.
But
I just
seen them
going from 1 building to another. There was
a little gap in between, and
he went and when I went back to
talk to see the people that I heard
it
could see him
seen a quick lip look at them there
and then went to the officer
to tell the officer, and he just... That
was all that I.
All that I got. How many gunshots did
you hear? I have no idea. It was
at first, I didn't know what
I heard. And then once it it became
clear what I heard that it was just
getting out of there and
I helped
helped
a lady
that had a 4 year old kid helped
them get out, and
That was
that was it we were done and
there's was home.
See you're obviously shaken up right now. Just
talking to me. A little bit. It's not
every day that
you're that close to anything like that. How
far do you think that shooter was from
the stage of, where the former president was
speaking?
Probably 202 hundred and 50 yards. Was it
parallel to where the president was, where his...
Where he was?
I could not see the president, So I'm
not a hundred percent sure, but it was
definitely
close to parallel. What are your questions right
now?
Just some light of this happening.
I don't have questions. I'm just, you know,
curious like anybody else and just seeing what's...
What I was still going on. I just
live I live close to here, so I'm
just
taking it all in and seeing
what's going on.
No questions. So... Thank you so much for
your time. Great to be called a conspiracy
you there. No questions, but I'm curious. Well...
That's questions, man. It's funny How people are
so reluctant to be like, This is odd.
That doesn't makes sense. Oh, you're a conspiracy
theorist it's that that's the whole point of
why that comes around.
And here, I think this is the same,
but I wasn't sure. I think this 1
actually folds up. Another witness can forward saying
the gunman, he saw the gun before the
shots rang out.
Take me back,
what were you doing before the shooting happened?
And then what did you see in here?
I was just hanging stand there like everybody
else waiting for Trump, and
we... As Trump started, we... I noticed
2 officers that were looking
for something or somebody.
I was... So I was looking around myself
and... So that's... So before it, you have
officers looking for somebody.
Doesn't that seem a little bit odd?
Like, what... If they're if they're being told
by multiple people, they see a guy with
a gun. And then they're looking for somebody,
At that point, there's no way they wouldn't
have notified secret service.
Dna guy on top of 1 of the
buildings,
go in between 1 building. I. I'm aware
this the same guide. Is this redundant? I
was doing something around it while Was playing
the other 1. I thought this 1 had
different information. Me know in the chat. The
next,
and,
went and told the officer that he was
up there.
And when I went back to my spot.
I heard that
people could still see the shit... The person
from where they were standing. So I checked
that out. And I went and went back
to tell the officer that if he came
over there, he could see them. Yeah. I
I think... But I wasn't sure if there
was an a part that was missing in
the last 1. In any case I think
that's very important to hear. You know, the
idea that they were looking a lot of
4 knowledge here. A lot of information that
they clearly had and did not act on.
Now here's the shot again.
Right? So you could argue that might have
been parallel but slightly to the left, but
in any case,
Trump is turning to the right, which makes
that even more on likely that he was
gonna get shot in his right ear, and
you can see the building that they were
on right next to them. The that... That's
that little small building that they're sitting on
that they're
aiming up for and clearly looking in the
same direction.
Doesn't make sense.
Here, same thing. This is from Fox News
shot, it looks like, showing you Trump stage
and there's that same little building and there's
what the sugar location is The same game,
guys. This is...
It doesn't make much sense.
Here... Oh, at this 1 was the 1
I showed you.
About the shooter, the snip the the their
snipers.
Oops. Dang it. Okay. So here's a close
shot.
Which I find very interesting. That's what I
use for today.
Now, it's hard to tell and as always,
it's camera shots, angles, lighting. There's there's ways
that camera... That photographs can play tricks on
certain percent. You know the way things look,
and it's always important to think about that.
But that being said.
First of all again, he's turned to the
right.
But I don't really see much maybe right
here at the very top of his year.
Is there may be something missing right there.
So if you do believe he was
it's a pretty small nick in his ear,
which I find pre
you know, that's just interesting.
But I don't really see much else. I'm
hearing all these different narratives about how it
went through his ear and through the bottom
of. All these different
that just simply do not line up with
what we're looking at.
That's him walking away
with his ears shot.
Now here,
That's all I was showing that... That's that
shot from down below perfectly capturing American flag.
Now, 1 of the arguments, you what I
I don't think I have that image pulled
up. 1 of the arguments was...
And you can see it. If you look
that there's really no blood on the right
beneath his here on his collar.
And the blood you could see, seems to
be pretty much just on his ear. Now
if you got shot in the cartilage of
your ear, that's notorious as it bleeds like
crazy.
So I find it off it would not
there wouldn't be a lot more blood. And
the other point is, oh, and that is
why I had the other video up.
I Now I wanna bring it back up
again, But, let me see if I have,
oh, here. Let me do this.
I've got it right here.
Okay. So watch what? The other part is
he would have blood on his hand. Wouldn't
he? Now maybe it's said they hadn't started
bleeding it. And I'm not saying these y'all
definitive approval thing. There's just data points that
you guys can consider. But watch?
I don't appear to see any blood in
this hand. Now it's it's a kind of
a fuzzy shot, and there are better shopping.
If you look. I don't... Doesn't appear that
there's any blood in his hand. Then from
sec then from there,
here,
This does look like you might be able
to see some blood.
Right there between his thumb and his finger,
but it's hard to tell.
Just for those that are making that point.
It's it's hard to tell whether or not
that was the case. That does... I mean,
it does look like that might be blood
on his hand right there.
If you see what I'm saying. Right there.
I don't if to see the mouse or
not. But between the thumb and his 4
is pointer finger.
But so then, you know, the whole thing,
like, what's weird about the the the shot
and, like, the the blood in his face.
Like, it just doesn't seem to really line
up for me with what you'd expect by
the
shot in the how much blood and saw
on. But here, this is a person highlighting
this man I've seen a lot of this
point. A... This man shot down the shooter
in just a second
after shots were fired. Well, that's not even
remotely accurate with what we've already seen.
He saved trump's life. Now this is that
random guy that was standing next to the
stage well after the shots were fired.
But
that could just be because this is the
guy that was there and somebody wants to
pretend they have a wrecking story and they
go, that the guy that was on the
stage. It must be him. The
mainstream alternative media. Really, it happens in all
media. It's not unique to 1 group or
the other the point is that there's a
lot of people that are just lazy with
their reporting or don't care It's not really
about being factual. It's about being first.
I'm not saying that about this guy. I
don't know. The point is clearly,
that does not appear to line up with
everything else you've already shown you.
On top of that,
This person simply goes, I guess secret service
agents just didn't notice a ladder leading to
a roof, a hundred and 50 way. Front
hundred and 50 feet is not accurate away
from Trump.
There's a lot of this that simply leads
to the conclusion, that somebody involved with this
allowed to happen or that they knew this
would happen and it was something for their
benefit.
Wall Street Journal
authority search for motive after Trump assassination attempt
And here they are claiming that it is
Matthew Thomas Matthew Crooks.
And we'll get into that in second. They're
adding
Again, Trump said that God prevented the unthinkable.
Secret service shot and killed the suspected gunman
identified as 20 year old math Thomas Matthew
Court Crooks.
Authorities also found explosive devices in his car
that he had been driving,
which is interesting. Certainly, if somebody's doing this,
it's not that far fetched to think they
would try to use it bombs, you know
whatever else they're gonna act crazy.
But
doesn't that seem consistent with a lot of
these other narratives we've seen? In a lot
of which we've shown later or not what
they appear to be, where you end up
finding this kind of stuff or you find
some weird... There's there's always seems to be
some kind of a explosive overlap and a
lot of these things turn out to be
false narratives. But I just kinda find that
interesting. They also found explosive devices in is
apparently. According to people briefed on the investigation.
And says 1 spectator was killed and 2
others critically injured. So now they're... They're reporting
2 other people were shot. I haven't seen
much followed up on that.
Crooks used a firearm that he that this
is important course for the the gun side
of it. He used a firearm that had
been purchased legally by his father. And explosive
devices found car. But the point is,
they're already pushing to use this to to
enact gun restrictions, you know, unconstitutional.
But what does that have to... If he
got a legal gun from his father, what
in the world does that have to do
with anything?
That's a legal gun? That's a whole point.
Is a gun restricted zone gonna do anything?
No. He's a key acting legally.
If his background shack gonna do anything? No.
Because he took... Point is this is all
being used always in a lot of different
ways that have nothing to do with what's
really going on.
Now here, the Ken Silva posting this is
AAA
person that was there, claiming they
are at least the the what everybody was
saying as I think kinda way she frames
it is there was 2 shooters.
Remember, there's multiple dynamics to this. It could
be that they just heard of the shots.
And just mistook that, but the fact with
Trump turning is right here being shot.
In my opinion adds a little bit more
credence to the possibility that that may have
been the case if you believe he was
actually shot.
Think it was this dishwasher. Out of there
as you're starting to process, I know we'll
all be processing sing this over the coming
days and weeks. How are you feeling now
in this moment? Well, what I've heard coming
out here is now, they feel that there
was 2 shooters on both sides. To So
they got the 1 on the tower
on this side, but the 1 on the
right side, they never got. So they... That's
why they want left to leave it immediately
because they thought they're still shooter out there
somewhere. So there could be in these woods
around Butler.
Aaron you know... I've covered many trump rallies.
I don't know how many you've been to.
6 just your... I was here the fourth
corner parking lot this morning. Yeah. I mean,
everything in me
screams that woman is just...
Report screaming, saying un
rumors that they heard. And if it comes
from the right talking head or it comes
from the right you know, the the the
certain pun... They they just repeat what was...
That's very common in the partisan media and
partisan supporters today.
But consider it,
the idea that there could have been a
nurse shooter, but it seems that seems completely
subjective to me, like a lot of this,
but considerate it.
The
Here, we're gonna get into the
aside from the first 1 we showed you
that was all yesterday, still a lot of
people claiming different narratives about who was shooting
and who and so on. Which any 1
of these could be the case, the point
being that a lot of these people are
saying this without any kind of verification. This
is a chu of Tiktok.
Trump rally shooter has been identified as 32
year old California resident Hank Peck. Now if
that's not the case, then that's pretty irresponsible
and we'll probably ruin Hank Peck life.
Shouldn't we care to make sure we verify
these things or is it just about making
sure that it is a California resident or
a Democrat, or so some kind of a
narrative that makes seem as if it's the
thing you want it to be? As far
as I can tell, that's entirely inaccurate.
This is a this is a... I'm not
even random. I'm not sure. A a person
posting online.
Simply highlighting,
and, again, I'm not leaning the the fact
check angle of this or calling them conspiracy
theorist. Do you know my stan and all
this. You have every right to ask these
questions. But it's irresponsible to state these things
when you have not fleshed them out,
like, a lot of them are doing. This
person is saying as was expected,
conspiracy theories around the shooting, which by the
way, just because they call them conspiracy theories
does not mean they're fake or incorrect, just
like the corporate Media has a lot of
really stupid theories they say our facts almost
always turn out to be false. The point
is from there's high, you know,
what's the right term for it? Their, you
know, their
High horse,
claiming that everybody else is confused, but nonetheless,
these things are accurate
or, I mean, rather these things are inaccurate
in the context of what's currently as far
we could tell. He's saying and around the
shootings are popping up like mushrooms. Conspiracy there.
Really why I would frame it to avoid
using the stupid term conspiracy theories, peep... There's
a lot of theories around the shooting that
are popping up all over the place, which
is completely okay. The problem I have is
people that are straining their theory as pro
information. He says, as this opaque moment is
the best time to get engagement to make
money, which I agree with. It's that. It's
also people that are interested in progressing a
partisan narrative or a partisan agenda.
Or just governments using it all to put
you in your place as they see it.
That's the government, not left and right, but
all of them. Now it says if you
aren't already, I suggest the I care about
that This a person that is corporate media
connected there they're, like, look to this guy
for the fact, and it's someone that lost
to you all the time. But here's what
I'm highlighting.
He's simply saying this video which will show
you in a second of what appears to
be Matthew Crook.
It's not... It says that he's claiming
And this is where it gets very confusing,
and I'm not saying I even know what
this this is up in the air right
now. There's a lot of overlapping information, a
lot of directly inconsistent and contradictory
information.
And more than once we've already seen even
the media, corporate wise lean into what they
claim as the person which later turns out
to be false. They're just as bad as
the mainstream alternative media guys are the same
thing as far as I'm concerned.
But it says this is not a video
of the shooter at Trump's Principal pennsylvania your
rally. This, he says is the exact same
Twitter user who pretended to be the shooter.
In an odd trolling attempt.
He posted this video an hour ago
and quickly deleted it. It's now being shared
as if it's a message by the real
shooter. Now you could take it 1 or
2 ways. I'll play in a second whether
you're saying you got the wrong guy in
the sense that it means he's the guy
or in the sense that you're saying that
I'm the guy when I'm not the guy.
You could take it either way. It's interesting.
But the point is this is he's claiming
that's not the guy even though that's what's
being presented in many cases as the guy
that's the shooter. He also then says, this
0IT
defender and then names Laura Loom, and some
other major accounts are false claiming that this
the same person is the photo
shooter at Trump's rally.
He... This this account is claiming, this is
the picture of that Twitter user who posted
himself drawing attempt a couple of hours ago
and is very much alive, and it seems
to be the case that he is alive
because he's posting videos going, you got the
wrong guy.
So either way you look at it, whether
it's a shoot or not, the point is
the lower loom of the world and the
rest are saying that that's the guy that
got killed, and you can clearly say that's
not the case.
Same old same old They're probably... But she'll
probably delete this 1 in minutes later anyway
and never look back even though she's drifting
all that support and money from all the
people that she is lying to.
And this one's simply saying, Jews try to
assassinate Trump, which again, my... Might you know
my stance on the any... The idea that
it's some kind of all the all the
Christians are all the jews that... It's just
broad str, which is always ignorant. If you
wanna make this argument, you can... You can
make you can make the argument, You have
a right to free speech. My point is
that the argument to claim that it's somehow
at a all of a certain religion Trying
to kill Trump doesn't really seem to make
sense to me. Our zion, sure. Jewish zion,
absolutely Christian Zion, absolutely. Or certain countries, Israel
or China or Russia. I mean, these would
make sense. But to say that Christians try
to kill and it doesn't really make much
sense. Does it. Here, the same account says
major blue ticket accounts are falsely claiming, and
this is the 1 we already showed you.
That, quote ant antifa extremist named Mark Violence,
who... Now we just showed you is not
even marked Violence.
Was the you at Trump Rally in Pennsylvania,
who earlier revealed his plan on Youtube. The
video shows an Italian football fan, Marco V
V
has nothing to do with the shooting, which
does appear to be the case. Not because
this guy said so or because they're fact
checking, but because we did our diligence and
that appears not to be the case or
that it's not the shooter.
So all that to be... All that just
said, that's all said in the point to
show you that a lot of this is
inconsistent. There's a lot of people pretending that
they can know.
When they don't.
I mean they're Post the same breaking,
which I don't know when anyway... Anyway, that
loves of breaking isn't what they all have
to do in the many cases it's the
information that's been any for hours. The Gunman
and really they take it from another account,
they breaking, but it says the gunman who
attempted to assassinate president Donald Trump was identified.
Which is the case even though whether or
not it's the truth,
near Coast, and the rest of them have
been and a lot of these account, major
corporate platforms are the 1 saying this Wall
Street Journal,
Well, identified as 20 year old Thomas Matthew
Crooks.
Now that
in my opinion is not that guy.
I I, jen... And again, this is the
guy they're cleaning was on the roof. That's
the picture largely being used. This is the
1 being circulated by the lure of the
world, but this
does not appear to be the same guy
and that, at least unless it's a camera
difference or light. Remember I said about his
hair, that's a much lighter hair color.
And what we saw earlier was darker brown.
Maybe it changed. That's certainly possible.
Remember the pictures.
Now on top of that, you see a
lot of this happening. And now this to
me quite frankly is just g. Like, nah,
it's... This is just people e or or
trolling for that batter. Just thinking it's funny,
the dump false information out there, which again?
Is their right? To say that they shouldn't
be able to do that is a violation
of the rights, guys. You should just be
smart enough to show discernment and due due
diligence and not blindly trust people share online
without your own... I mean, that's Twitter files
for you. That's what they want from you.
They wanna use it as kind of a
problem action solution situation to drive you to
justify and support, that your own censorship. But
here is a random account. Saying Trump rally
shooter immediately killed by law enforcement after assassination
failed.
Identification found his body, identifies him as a,
Ukrainian man, apparently named Semen
High.
Doesn't that Facebook look familiar?
You might you might think so. I'll show
you why. This is not a new thing.
This is really interesting by the way. And
then they're comparing to this guy, which as
far as I can tell it's not even
remotely the same guy. That's just lazy, but
maybe it's should about trying to get attention.
Right? Here, another 1 doing the same thing.
And that, hey, remember that guy.
Remember that guy that keeps popping up and
being shoved in the conversation as somebody, even
the corporate media at 1 point ended up
pointing to this guy even though ended up
not being the guy.
This,
is the same face as far as I
can tell,
the point though nonetheless is that neither of
these are what we're actually talking about. But
this account says breaking.
They federal security service
have published images of a major suspect in
the shooting of Donald Trump. Authorities have identified
the man as ukrainian citizen known as Simon.
Dan. Now again, that very well may be
true.
Based on everything I can see, that doesn't
seem to be the case, but just realize
that the narrative we're getting from media
doesn't add up.
The shooting angles, the people involved, like, I'm
questioning the corporate media narrative more than anything.
But then realizing within it, you're seeing these
alternative alternative narratives that also seem to be
completely devoid devoid of evidence.
My point even saying that is because it
wouldn't surprise excuse me.
I got my hiccup up. It wouldn't surprise
me.
If Ukraine or somebody like that was involved
in this. If not to support Trump because
doing this and making sure you don't kill
them would definitely, as we're gonna show you
drive supported donald Trump. That's 1 of the
possibilities. In my opinion you 1 of the
less likely because of all the other inconsistencies,
but it's certainly possible this was about trying
to make Trump the attacked hero.
But it's just funny to me that this
picture, this picture literally pops up now almost
every shooting like this. And it circulates and
people lie about it. And it and honestly
think it's just trolling to be clear to
be really honest. I think it's funny. But
it... There's plenty of people that don't know
that in high level account share it going.
When we knew it. It's a democrat. It's
whatever we want to say for our narrative.
We hear syrian and girl, showing the image
that at least is being presented as I
think as the 1 they're claiming is the
shooter.
Showing you what the image, by the way,
the image in the back being misrepresented by
a lot of people saying this is a,
you know, nazi symbol a symbol of In
Israeli in Israeli secret intelligence service symbol, which
all of them you could argue or also
could be an American Eagle symbol. That Eagles
has been used a lot. Right? The point
is she finds out that it is in
fact, actually the demolition ranch
shirt.
She says the Trump shooter has a demolition
rain shirt on. So like, a like a
rain shooter.
And she's right. This may have a negative
effect on gun laws, which is already happening,
whether or not he had the shirt on.
But that's interesting because this is important. If
this guy is a rain shooter if that's
actually him,
how does that make sense? That doesn't mean
good, but at least suggest he's practiced,
And then we're gonna talk about the fact
that they missed a hundred and 30 meter
shot,
which doesn't seem very... It's... And we'll show
you right now. People are arguing doing That's
a very easy shot for somebody who's done
this before.
Again,
this is the guy
that they're showing or least... Let's put it
this way. This is the guy that was
shot on that roof according to the corporate
media according to the police that were there
and the image they put out. So does
this guy look like that guy?
Corporate I personally don't think so at all.
Again, look at the hair color. Now that
could have changed. Maybe the lights changing it.
But also the point everyone's honing in on
is the ear,
which is the... His right ear, but this
1 you're looking at the left, but that,
you know, we'll show you the more of
it a second, doesn't really seem to line
up. But that image right there also doesn't
listen look like this guy. It also doesn't
look like the other matthew crooks, were gonna
show you who is still alive.
Now, of course, B News, which is in
no way related to the Bricks movements all,
which clearly, I forget what it's connected to,
but this is this account already been called
out for spreading egregious
misinformation, which they have a right to free
speech, but they've been caught lying about important
things more than once.
But they simply say just in, Matthew
Thomas Matthew Crooks,
a 20 year old school shooter who tried
to assassinate Trump was featured in a black
rock commercial in 20 23, which by the
way is interesting because Black rock is very
clearly connected to Trump things all over the
place was allowed to take over the treasury
during Trump's administration,
And And I mean there's a thousand ways
that Trump overlaps with Black Black rock, and
it's just funny to me that this... It's
about, like, AAA partisan an idea to make
it seem like that's like a democrat thing.
It's very strange to me. But the point
is this guy video, but this is the
guy who appears to be
this guy.
Right? That looks like that guy.
But hard to tell.
So let's just say for sake conversation. That's
the guy they're pointing at, it appears he's
in this black rock radio for 20 23.
But as we go through this, it seems
to start to... The the information develops more
to suggest that neither of them. Are the
guy we're talking about. Now here is Dung
who I I respect is work,
calling out Laura Loom.
And she's the 1 saying, are same thing.
Exclusive, a thing other people have shared. Here's
the black lock a video with this guy,
Black lock black rock video. Now realize, she's
already deleted more than 1 tweet that she's
been wrong about without noting on that. So
let's
pepper this with the possibility that she could
be wrong again. Remember that she literally just
got called out for posting a video about
that Hawk 2 girl, claiming that she was
claiming saying something about Trump, and it's a
30 second clip.
And if you listen to it, this not
even remotely me what's actually happening and 1
of her viewers, followers were like trevor Laura,
That's not even what it says. And she
goes, you've corrected me. That's right. And I'm
going like, how in the world? Did you
even watch the 30 second video before you
play the thing and mis what it's about
or was it just about getting clicks or
was it just about achieving a narrative? These
people are not on your side, guys, whether
it's because of their own incompetence or because
they're doing something more nefarious. There's so many
people out there that are constantly misleading you.
The point,
And again, it very... Let's just be very
clear about this. I'm saying all of that
independent of what's going on here, but on
top of what's happened in the last couple
of days, but that's not to say that
Matthew cook.
Crook. Excuse me is not the guy. That
my point in all this is that I
don't think anybody knows just yet. But here
is what Dutch and has to say. This
is where this information really starts to line
up.
And very few people are making this point.
He's just simply going, hey, Laura, I've already
tried to show you this and you're not
listening. That he's he's claiming the shooter as
a person named Maxwell
Y.
He says the crook guy is still alive,
which I'll show you. He's making videos and
saying you got the wrong guy.
Is still alive and had to set his
Twitter
profile
protected after the shooting. Now, that could be
because he's hiding something or It could be
because he was mis as a shooter of
donald Trump and he's getting threatening messages and
getting attacked. This has happened before. As I
said recently.
During the Boston Bombing.
People that were, you know, social media people
were sharing information and put out the false
narrative, which even some corporate platforms said They
put out the images of people that were
not involved,
and those people got
a lot of negative attention.
And you could argue this happen many times
throughout history where people have been misrepresented as
involved with something, and it ruined their lives.
That's why we have to be responsible about
this and and not just rush to the,
say what we want to say to get
attention.
But he says that this is... He had
to...
Put his this pair
account unprotected. And I I I've seen his
Facebook account discussed, and I've seen his Instagram
account discussed, a lot of the ones that
I'm seeing shared are just other accounts that
use the name and even maybe use the
picture, but you go back and look and
it was created yesterday, and it's got 4
shares. The point is there's a lot of
drift out there trying to make things look
the way they want them to. But he
simply... Oh, and this is deleted now. Okay.
This...
This is frustrating guys.
Now, I'm gonna go through this more because
there's other information
that other than what he's saying. But now
he may believe in this because maybe that
is false.
But he's simply highlighting it saying, Kirk said
blonde, mo air, shooter completely dark hair. Here's
the image overlap. Does appear to be similar,
and the ear you can't see, but I'm
gonna show you something which why which is
why I think there isn't any inconsistency to
that. That guy does not appear to be
that guy, and I'll show you that more.
But he says this makes you look really
bad. All these people be able to sue
you if you don't correct soon.
Maybe delete it because he don't wanna embarrass
Laura. I don't know.
But so here... Here's where we go forward
from this.
Here's Riley How. Let's see if they deleted
it.
Here's just still be there.
He says, it's beginning to look like the
media was wrong. Which is this I appreciate
reporting like this because he's not saying, you
know, for sure. But he's saying Thomas Matthew
Crooks is not the shooter. He's claiming.
He's saying the shooter has the face of
Maxwell Uric and the ear of Ken Hoop
as Maximal Uric has gauge.
Something is not right with the intermediary reporting.
Cover up in progress. So what he's interestingly
pointing out, and I'll play this video for
you.
Is that this image from this reporting
This is back in 20 20 17, saying
Pittsburgh.
So same location, Trump protesters sentenced to jail
time. They're protesting Trump. Now this is the
guy they're showing but the ear they're highlighting
is this guys.
These are different people. So right there, there's
any inconsistency even with that argument.
That just seems like none of this is
really adding up and maybe intentionally so.
Here is what...
The next 1 shows the... Oh, here and
here's Derek. I think I've got this Yeah,
right here. Next video you. Derek are simply
highlighting the same kind of sc missus. I
still I I'm still seeing conflicting reports about
whether the shooter was thomas Matthew Crooks or
Maximal Year. Crooks. As it registered Republican, which
is true, and Europe was an anti trump
activist.
Someone looking like Crooks has put out a
video saying you got the wrong guy as
anyone else anything more solid on this. Here's
the 1 he's talking about. Now well, here's
what's important. This is why this gets... This
is why it's so in...
Infuriating that these kind of people were highlighting
or flooding the field with misinformation. And again,
they have a right to do so,
because this image is this guy.
Wherever it is right here.
Hold on. This image. This the 1 that
Laura Loom in the rest of Sharing. That
is that guy. That's same shirt, same glasses,
everything. And here he is
posting a new video saying you got the
wrong guy.
So just because that's the video they're sharing
because not mean as is the guy. This
could very well be somebody completely not even
connected to this. And we're using these names
and that even be him. You see what
I'm saying? Because also... Up in the air.
But here's what this video is saying but
you got the wrong guy.
My name is Thomas Matthew Crooks.
I hate Republicans.
I hate Trump, and guess what?
You got the wrong guy.
Now, you could read into that and think
he means that he's the guy or you
could simply read into it and think that
he's laughing about the fact that because he
hates republicans, that they're all aiming at the
wrong guy. Like him, meaning him. That you
think it's me, It's not me, and then
what's always he's making fun of you. Either
way you could read that. Right? But I
think it's important to note is this guy
made a video after the fact. So all
these lures of the world that are saying
he was the 1 that got shot. Clearly
they're wrong.
So that could either mean that he's they're
wrong and he is still the shooter, but
he's alive or it could mean that it's
somebody else entirely.
All sorts of manipulation going on. Now here,
Wondering Jack wolf says there's a Facebook account
that seems to be claiming the same thing.
Definitely questionable, this is literally all its content,
so it could be a brand new account.
Right? That's also possible.
But it simply says, just wanna tell everyone,
it wasn't me, which if that's real, would
suggest more that he's saying you got the
wrong guy in the sense that you're aiming
at him, but it wasn't even him.
Now here the patriot voice says, now it's
it's being reported, and this is as of
the fourteenth.
As of
12:30 today.
That Thomas Matthew Crooks is not the alleged
shooter, and then that it is a guy
affiliated with Antifa, but not the same guy.
Mark Violet they said was Antifa turned out
to be Matt V or whatever, and he's
not even not even anti antifa, but not
even the right guy. Now he's saying it's
a Antifa guy that was actually arrested back
in 2016
for being involved in Anti Trump protest in
Pittsburgh. They're talking about these guys.
Different See so you can muddle this always
is, it doesn't have to be that way,
guys. Now not saying you have a right
to stand up and say whatever you want.
And when our I'm talking about the people
that present themselves as journalists reporters, aggregate
of information that
jump to and safe that they can't back
up.
You have a right to do it, but
you should be embarrassed
by continuing to do that all that does
is, first of all, makes it very diff
for those of us trying to be objective
to present ourselves as objective or we're talking
about things like this because of people like
you, but it also makes it confusing for
average people just trying to find the truth.
And so they end up settling
for people that they want to blindly trust.
Which by the way, perfectly promotes the corporate
media narrative agenda.
It it very much does. They want you
to lean into the partisan ship and pick
someone to trust That is how they manipulate
you. That's what these people are or whether
they know it or not, they're promoting that
mainstream agenda.
But he goes on to say, his name
is Y,
which
is the guy they're highlighting here,
Kenneth Hoop, Ken Hoop and Matthew Ear. So
he's a guy and a real person.
He was sent it to 3 to 12
months in Jail,
after the... After protesting and so on. Says
I don't know who is the true shooter
at this point, and it seems like we
are being intentionally confused about it. That that
does kinda feel like what's going on right
now. He says we know they are going
to wipe this person's entire history, which I
don't know we say we know that whether
maybe maybe we'll be misled about the fact
that even happened. Right? Let's not constantly jump
into the idea of, like, picking between their
presented narratives. It's just as likely this was
completely manufactured, which I know is not supposed
to be set out loud. Of course, that's
possible.
But he says,
side note, Maxwell has viable gauge in his
ears and his mug.
Now they are closed closed up.
As an American citizen, he says, I'm calling
on the Fbi, Dhs and Doj to designate
antifa as a terrorist organization. Why would that
be your jump when you can't even verify
this guy's even connected yet, And you even
pointed that out.
Now, frankly, I think Antifa and things like
the Patriot front during other...
Overlapping groups
are
for or, you know, whether their Fbi or
some kind of organized from an end and
I think we're being manipulated. I really do.
I think that's pretty damn obvious. They're all
weirdly. It's like they just have... Here's ant
antifa with their black head head covers and
and Khaki on or whatever it is. They're
all black, then you got the same... Seemingly
set up with the same heads covers, and
but here's khaki, though. So we're the right
version. Here's left version.
It's either lazy or just if that's how
stupid they think we are, but people full
for it. And it's not again, Not say
that they're not actually doing things, and maybe
they should be labeled as such, but just
realize where it comes from in my opinion
at the very least.
And open an immediate investigation. He says I
do not.
Would... He says, I I do not do
so would be to be comp implicit in
these heinous acts he says. Now again, they're
highlighting this whole ear thing, what was weird
to me is again, you look and you
can see that that's the ear of this
guy,
not the guy they're claiming it is.
Very mixed up isn't it. Now
Now let's talk about
the partisan
manipulation and the just the skepticism that we
should all like rightly have in all of
this.
And gonna leave some of these up for
pointing back to.
So
David Ike said this. This was today.
The perception control of taking sides is on
public display after the Trump shooting.
Those on the Trump supporting right ask no
questions, and this is... I I would argue
It's not. I I think he's doing the
same thing. I would frame it as, which
is, like, partisan ship in the 2 party
illusion, which I actually of the mind that
a lot maybe
a lot, maybe the majority of conservatives or
Democrats or rather liberals,
aren't really buying into a lot of the
errors at this point, but they're still concerns
still liberal, but... When I say like, the
Republicans and Democrats. I'm talking about the 2
party illusion. Which I think a lot of
those same people don't really identify with anymore.
Not so I'm just making clear that it's
not all Republicans. When I say that. It's
it's or all conservatives rather. And I think
he's kinda doing the same thing. He's simply
saying that those are the Trump supporting right
ask no questions when they would normally do
so
And rightly, after a school shooting, etcetera. He's
right. A lot of them are seemingly
of them, but just kind of going, this
is a shooting, and we just support him
because Trump's is a hero and just kind
of not really pushing into it when they...
You know they would. Is except for those
that can...
Sorry. I'm mixing it up. He simply says
that they're not asking questions, except for those
that confirm their belief system. Then he goes
meanwhile, the Trump hating left claimed that the
shooting was staged.
The Trump supporting right condemned such claims if
when had it been Biden, they would have
been the ones asking the same questions. And
we all kind of know that.
Deciding a situation by reflex action based on
your side,
which I was just highlighting, which is what
they want from you and these partisan liars
are the ones kind of pushing you into
that, whether they know it or not. He
says there's no way to establish the truth
about anything,
Proper researchers don't take sides, which can skew
their perceptions and ask all the necessary questions
before reaching their conclusions. Yeah. Welcome to the
daily wrap up. That's what we do.
He says dis passionate forensic
calm is how you reach the truth in
any situation. Not emotional reaction based on frequency
political or religious beliefs.
He, I'm not saying that the shooting was
not genuine.
In whatever sense that turns out to be,
nor that the protection squad do not have
many questions to answer. He says I'm saying
that we cannot pick and choose what we
question and when we don't, if we have
any interest
in establishing the truth in any situation. So
he's not He's like, I'm not he's like,
I'm not even saying what I think happened.
He just acknowledging just like we have been
doing that this is un...
What happening right now is demonstrating what we're
all trying to highlight is the problem for
those of us to see beyond the 2
party illusion.
It is dangerous. It's irresponsible, and yes, they
right to do it. If we wanna change
anything, we have to be able to stand
back and recognize that those people do not
deserve your respect.
He says if the questions are not, but
valid, then they will be shown to be
so, and we get closer to the truth
that way. Not asking them and seeing if
the answers stand up to scrutiny is the
way we have been scammed over and over
generation of generation. Asking questions should never be
condemned, no matter if you agree with them
or not. Exactly.
Bend down this road and it doesn't work.
He he clearly questions Trump and Alex and
Tucker and all that whole thing and I
do too.
Now here is his son saying Ga Saying,
seeing quite a lot of people being jumped
on for questioning the Trump shooting.
Several tweets claiming it's disrespectful. That's usually the
route they take an emotional route. He says,
I remember the exact same response when people
questioned 09:11.
7 7.
And October seventh in the immediate aftermath. How
dare you suggest logical questions.
He says no 1 knows the facts right
now,
and the only way to get to them
is to ask questions and dig a bit.
Are those Trump supporters that are claiming it's
disrespectful to question? Honestly,
suggesting that we're that were of if Biden
punching the air beneath the American flag. Like
point being as those Biden, they would, of
course, be saying we need to ask questions.
He says with blood across his face that
they wouldn't be questioning events,
obviously, they would.
Now here's what Derek was saying this was
I believe yesterday, saying I'm just gonna say
it. I don't trust this.
And I feel the exact same way by
the way. There's that that could mean that
Trump was still being taken advantage of or
make Trump was the... Target of an assassination
attempt or rather an agenda that put him
in the midst of it, and maybe he's
not involved. But the point being is, there's
obviously something wrong here.
I know that's commonly what you'll hear from
a lot of people in lot these events,
but you know from my past that I'm
very skeptical about, you know, very cautious about
leaning into just kind of blatantly saying this
is something that's wrong or they're lying or
a Si up or whatever.
But as adjust what we've gone through,
Right at the moment, the evidence does not
support. There's there's inconsistencies here. Now maybe tomorrow,
there'll be information that comes out that fills
those gaps, and it'll be okay. Well, there
you go. The story fits together. But as
of right now, I'm with Derek. I don't
trust this. There's something wrong going on. Too
early to say for sure he says, but
I don't see this being good either way.
He says, either staged, designed to create more
sympathy for Trump before he come comes in
and implements the great inversion fake awakening. Or
potentially real and will be blamed on leftist
and used just more government to some capacity.
Now, alternatively, you could argue the same and
reverse, of course, it could be a trump...
A a
Trump had rat by the media
representation of him that decided to take action
and that should be blamed on them.
Right? That's... And not that they are legally
responsible. And what we have to take account
for the fact that what you're doing is
hurting people.
Not in the sense they're using to try
to shut us down My point is they
have right to do it. But we... It's
my point is always with free speech or
anything else. They have a right to it,
but you have a right to say you're
disgusting, Call them out for it.
Or it could be some actual attack from
somebody within the paradigm trying to take out
Donald Trump. Those are also just as likely.
But this person falls up and says, do
you know how hard it this to hit
a guy at hundred yards? Well, As I
understand it, and I spoken to more than
1 person who is a sniper,
It's apparently not that hard. At least if
you know, if you're, you know, in any
way practiced. But he says the best shooters
have 1 0 moa group. That's 1 inch
and a hundred yard that means they hit
Trump with head of 1 of every 3
shots. Now Again, I'm not an expert here,
but that... I don't Just... That's not what
I'm hearing from other people.
Thirds Basically saying that the idea that if
it was a a staged event, then the
guy had to be an amazing to make
sure he hits his ear. Well, again, isn't
that a little? What if there wasn't even
a shot? What if that was something else
going on? I'll get into those theories in
a second.
But Derek simply said there's also the possibility
that the ear injury is? Not from the
gun.
Exactly. But of course, that's ridiculous and people
commenting,
no and that would it to the photo
of the bullet, which was we've already will
show in a second more, which I don't
know, guys,
the Fbi associated entities is claiming this, but
am I crazy or that does does not
look real to me, we'll get to that
in a second.
But I don't know. I'm not an expert
on photography either, So very well could be.
But the idea... Just because there's a bullet,
flying through the air It also doesn't mean
that.
Again, it could be like a 1 percent
possibility. But we can't these people that just
wanted dismiss
possibilities
when nobody has the full picture because they're
convinced, that's what's called false certainty in my
opinion, and it is everywhere in partisan.
Here's Blake Hall, which by the way inter
weirdly enough is the founder and Ceo of
Id dot me, which we were literally just
talking about. Your digital identity wallet, not that
that has to be connected. I just found
that an interesting point,
but
he's saying I was the sniper employment officer
from my Battalion and led hundreds of combat
missions, there were major security lapses in the
security plan that allowed the shooter to engage
with Trump from a hundred and 30 meters
an easy shot. He sets. Officer And this
this is 1 example online, but I'm talking
about people that, like, I'm actually gonna point
out in a minute, not to say that
Brad Miller commented on the sniper part of
it, but that he believes this is something...
That we're being lied to.
I I holds his opinion in high regard.
My point is there's people online and the
people that I've spoken to. They're saying from
a shooting perspective, this is not a difficult
shot if you're in any way practiced.
But he says, how can the dude it
at the cook out spot the shooter before
the detail? I agree. The far rooftop is
an obvious firing position. Local police should have
been deployed to secure it, and none of
them did. These are all the points have
already made. He said there's a sniper team
scanning the rooftop for threats. But the team
only have long has long guns. You generally
want a security an element c with assault
rifles that can engage much faster,
especially with 300 meters. They could engage fast
enough. But it says they neutralize the target,
but not before he wounded president Trump if
that's what happened, killed in innocent civilian and
seriously wounded 2 more, Good shooting. But gross
failures in the plan
meant that this... They were too slow to
detect the threat, mission failure.
That's his opinion. Consider it.
Now, this is the kind of thing it
frustrate me. I've over over the last so
many years. I've I've come to, appreciate Glenn
Green Wall work more. But I still... There's
still I, there's still things that I'm very
suspicious about it to be honest. But at
the same time,
this is the kind of thing that I
have such a problem with. But especially as
they're are some of the ones that at
certain times, whether it's during... Like, right now,
He he's clearly calling out what's going on
with this israel real, which makes you go
okay, maybe they can kinda see beyond the
mainstream narratives, But a lot of these people
they're higher up in the a hierarchy of
event of media, they tend weird block when
it comes to what they perceive as conspiracy
theory in a lot of sense.
So right now, at least when he posted
this yesterday, what was trending was staged.
1 of them anyway. Clearly talking about Trump
and whether this event was staged. A lot
of... About more Republicans than you'd believe, I
see saying that.
But here's what he says, very healthy populous
that has been cultivated.
So let's be clear.
You can say it's wrong because there's no
way anybody could truly know it at that
point or most likely not, but that goes
for You too, Glenn.
Nobody really knows. So why is it unhealthy
to simply promote a possibility that is just
as likely as anything else? It's because that's
conspiracy theory. I mean that's the only way
I can read this? Which...
What's upset me because I've seen it at
least point out things that others recall conspiracy
theory, And I'm just tired of this childish,
which dismissal of things based on the idea
that something's want a conspiracy, like things are...
Like, which is a legitimate thing that happens
in the world or people in power inspired
to manipulate you, and you theo about how
that's happening. That's not... That's only ridiculous because
of the narrative around with that word or
a phrase is supposed to mean.
For him to say it's unhealthy or a
suggestion that it's unhealthy to point out that
it might have been staged is in my
opinion a weakness. It is a mental block.
Because, obviously, that's possible, whether it's 1 percent
or 99 percent, it's clearly possible.
Weird.
When this person says, what does that mean?
They think it was staged and he says,
yes. Don't click on the trending word unless
you want to p all viral tweets like
this.
Says it looks very staged. Sound like be
begun. Nobody in the crowd is running or
panicking. Nobody in the crowd has heard a
gun. Why is that wrong, Glenn?
He's not saying, look, there's a lot of
people that I would point out and say
disgusting who are going. We know this and
we know that. This person simply going. Here's
my opinion.
Why is that wrong, Glenn? I really want
people to think about that?
Is it it's it's wrong to express what
you think
if it's out side of a selected area
of a allowable opinion?
Does not make you just as bad as
than other people Glenn that you're pointing out
around news guard and the rest? Yes.
It's just a little bit more extreme for
you, but recognize it's the same conversation. We're
getting there. Maybe if they're honest, they'll see
that, but my point is that's a problem.
Yes, you can ask these questions. Guys, always
ask these questions. Now, Brad Miller,
in response to Shannon Joy. Oh, I gotta
sure share that first. Somebody says, am I
the only person in the world who's skeptical
about this whole thing,
which I'm not very familiar with their work.
I follow aware of I've seen something things
she's done that I agree with that I
appreciate.
Mean not somebody I keep tabs on. My
point though is that ultimately,
there seem to be a lot more people
than they're highlighting that actually are very skeptical
about this.
From within their republican side from people that
are on partisan and all over the part
is all over the map. So no, Shannon,
I agree with you. There's a lot of
people that are going. There's something off about
this.
Just skeptical. Skepticism is very healthy in every
context.
And Brad Miller...
Oh, I that.
Respond this. And again, we just interviewed with
Brad Miller the second time,
very intelligent person, very objective.
Very intelligent and who comes to this
conversation. He's
military. And he said, I think it was
scripted.
There's a lot of things the point that
direction by the way. And he says my
assumption is they've already selected Trump to be
the president, which is something he and I
agree on. We talked about it in this
discussion, and are merely building the narrative to
accompany the stage management.
No, yes. That gets into a priest Specific
opinion that you people people love to call
conspiracy theory It's definitely a theory
and is a theory about people that are
cons inspiring to manipulate you, but the term
is used in a way that means fake
or derogatory.
And this person says the same thing. As
a conspiracy theory,
in quotes realist with a very high proven
success rate, and I respect your value work.
This is a stretch.
But again, it's just him presenting his opinion
about this. I think It was scripted. So
it's funny how people that are even self
described conspiracy theorist are going well. Hold on.
That's a bit too far. I just don't
understand that logic. It's broken.
It's just another theory.
But he says people say that initially about
every op. Anyway, my point is, whatever is
the logic and, maybe we can get him
in and talk about it. He's a very
intelligent person and I hold his opinion high
regard. So him saying that, I think should
consider it. I mean, I already am in
the same field. And what, I mean, realizing
scripted.
Could mean any number of things.
It could even mean not involving Trump,
but just consider that possibility.
Here's another 1. Jeff Bur points simply goes.
Well, here you go. Trump supposedly shot at
the rally.
Puts his hand on his ear and face,
then blood on his ear in face. Now
the old world wrestling federation trick. He was
part of the Wwf,
oldest of the book or oldest stuff the
old.
Excuse me.
Pardon me. Getting choked. And he says all
part of the Jones plantation show. He says
he raises a fist as he's carried off,
what a show. Well, I'll have to look
into the details as they come out for
now, it looks staged. His opinion.
Just considering the thing we were talking about,
the idea that, you know, you... Again, if
he's facing...
If his ear is his head is in
the way of the ear that was apparently
shot by the guy across the field. I
think that really continues to stand out is
1 of the most obvious anomalies in all
this put his hand on comes away with
blood, but I didn't see blood in his
hand, but I did seem to see it
between his thing or his thumb, maybe there's
something that I don't know... I'm just... I
don't think this is exactly what happened.
But just
continuing to hypo about what he's suggesting and
there's some things that would line up with
that.
Shiva,
definitely think the staged. Now, I I suppose
to funny.
He comes out and says, which 1 is
staged?
I can... He's like, I can see why
some may wonder.
And he's simply for the podcast shows a
bunch of different versions at W where he's
pumping his fist in the here. Which, you
know, that's necessarily pro in any way, but
something to consider, same kind of fist bump
or fist
idea.
So the suggestion from all these people is
that that might be fake.
Here
is Derek Bro saying this fit and this
is back to that same point. So with
with what they're saying,
Derek says the video appears to show the
secret service snipers on the roof facing the
direction of the shooter, how can they be
up there and not see the man laying
with the gun? After everything else we've already
heard as well, revisiting this point. With people
telling them for multiple directions. We see them
on the roof. Multiple people telling police and
secret service, they both said that. Minutes if
not more beforehand, then the 1 guy said
they had multiple people that were looking for
the guy. At this point, no 1 said
a word and except in the and the
the the third point was that they shot.
And these people there were like, we can
see the guy, then you hear shots fire
out, and they said he's turning toward me.
And then with that last pop, they say
he was shot, but that doesn't line up
with the other side of the narrative where
they're claiming they were responding to the shooting,
and that was what took him out.
But my point is you can see this
very clearly where the guy responds
to the shooting.
Right there.
Again, either the very first shot was Trump's
sniper or it was at the same time.
And somehow didn't kill this guy. Didn't take
him out and it took all the shots
beforehand. I mean, none of this really seems
to add up same point.
Now here is an interesting point,
which in my opinion,
seems to at least continue to point the
direction that this was something that was kinda
being social you know, predictive programmed,
social engineered, laying out the breadcrumbs,
or this guy just got very lucky, or
he's actually prop patronizing about something. The point
does he says in March, Brian Big,
claiming to have had a vision of the
future,
including a very specific
assassination attempt on Trump, which would literally raise
his ear and even points to the same
ear,
They find very interesting. Bringing back America because
the lord told me he said, I am
not done with America.
He said there's going to be a new
wave of patriotism coming out, and that's whenever
I saw Trump, and I saw the... I
saw a a red wave coming out of
Michigan. And then I saw Oklahoma and there
was... You love this. So god's telling him
there's gonna be a red wave.
I'm sorry if I find that really stupid.
Members of people, and they were all on,
these... These... They had torches, all throughout Oklahoma
and they were raising up these torches that
look like... Fire, and they were bringing forth
a new patriotism upon the nation, and it
was coming... It was being birthed and it
it just kept spreading like fire all throughout
America all throughout, and I saw Trump rising
up, and then I saw an attempt on
his life.
That the this bullet flew by his ear,
and it came so close to his head
that it busted his
eardrum. And I saw,
whether that ended up being reported or not,
would be pretty interesting. Right? If suddenly, it
comes out that, oh, yeah, that, know, also
my eardrum was affected or something like that.
He was... Now he fell to his knees
during this time frame, and he started worshiping
the lord he got radically born again during
this time frame. I'm talking...
People say he's saved now, but he becomes
really on fire for Jesus for what I
saw coming. And then I saw... Yeah. This
Trump worship is just so alarming
or worship... You know, this state worship of
any
ruler.
It's quite alarming to me. It's blind support.
It's... How do... My point is always, whether
it's religious zion where how do you argue
against somebody claiming this this is god sent.
What if I disagree with that? Now you're
bla is. Like, it's just... There's no... This
is irrational.
Now you... Maybe you're right, and... And I'm...
Challenging what God said. But the point is
there's no dynamic there where we can have
an honest conversation about that. Because if I
challenge you, you're on the enemy to you,
which is exactly the point.
This is in March.
This guy's talk, you know, it these it
is possible. These things could happen.
Maybe he's maybe he's put out 14 different
for prop prophecy. And just that's the 1
that's accurate. I mean, the point is we
don't really know. But at the end of
the day, if you believe this is more
about being staged then that seems interesting about
kind of seasonal setting the breadcrumbs to what's
about to happen, which is usually how these
events go if they're manipulated.
But again, my point my thought, I don't
I don't put too much screens in that.
But it does have the, a video
discussing this, I think that was right here,
Man, I hate how that happens. Youtube is
such crap.
I had it paused, but it just randomly
starts playing on its own and goes through,
like, 3 different videos before we get... Oh,
yeah Look, I can't even go back. Look
at that. It won't even let me zoom
back to the video that was there.
Youtube. The the a lot of this stuff
is really manipulative. Here's the 1 I was
actually had open.
Why would it not let you go back
to what I originally opened? Telling you the
very strange these things, but
that's the video Trump shot, prophecy fulfilled, predictions
Trump must know by 2 prophets.
So, guys, let's not forget again.
Trump called himself the chosen 1. Israel and
a lot of their religious zion aspects thing
to think he's somehow like the prophet or
the God said, it's alarming.
And don't forget. This has been what queue
and the rest of these being really flirting
with, the idea that sent out some kind
of god religious overlap, Let's not forget about
how that ties back to intelligence and there's
no way Israel, zion, and they're not involved
in all of that. There's a reason this
is being pushed.
Now to this shot,
I just want to get... Give me your
thoughts on this. I just do not think
that looks like what you. I mean, is
that supposed to be a bullet.
And ask yourself, How does... So if that
he's shot on the right side of his
his right ear, does that look like that's
flying on the right side of his ear
nose looks like it's further closed, But again,
it's a camera shot who knows. Now looking
at this, it doesn't appear to be Ai,
but it's hard to tell. I just don't
think this looks legitimate. That it The first
thing I saw that I'm like, on. Now
somebody even posted this already then deleted.
So maybe They even thought it was fake.
I don't know. But here is the times
the new York Times.
Photo appears it's a weird way to frame
that to capture path of Bullet.
And it says Michael Har, a retired Fbi
special agent. So you know you can trust
him, guys. Said the image captured by Doug
Mills and New York Times photographer also Means
you could trust him, seems to know show
it seems to show the bullet. Why I
even framing me like that if they're telling
us it's the bullet. Streak past donald Trump.
The point is they're claiming that, you know
the air was manipulated by the bullet. And
that's what you're seeing.
I don't know, guys. I just don't think
that looks real, but you guys can tell
me what you think. I'm not an expert
in these things, so I don't know.
But
all that behind us, theo, different things. Let's
talk about to to last 3 segments here
to talk about this. You know, how
kind of the 4 knowledge aspect a little
bit of the of the of
the
detail,
the involvement of Trump,
the conversation of, what else was it the?
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Have the part overlaps as
well. So here's Sean Davis saying a... A
source familiar with Trump security detail,
which again, all of this stuff. At my
point in saying that about the near york
times the Fbi or the, you know,
it's... If if you if you're of the
mind, this is some sort of a lot
like, like, a non partisan perspective. This is
a
manipulation for some other larger end, it would
be easy to utilize their propaganda to platforms
to do just that.
Think about that. Government I don't know why
we would trust the Fbi in New Times
or anybody else involved in this. But... And
again, the Fbi, you know, a group that
is clearly called out
routinely.
By people within the parent. I'm it's just
funny how these things ignore certain things when
it suits certain interest. But Davis says a
so familiar with Trump security details. So who
knows if they're lying about it, tells the
federal list, that the farmer and future president's
detail or Trump has been asked for
beef up protection in resources for weeks But
has been re buff time and again. Now
that could mean that they knew this was
gonna happen, but if that's the case, why
wouldn't they been pulled entirely.
Right? I mean, the argument is that sort
of what they tried to do during the
lawsuits and stuff. They said, they they should
they should be pulling his detail, which did
happen.
But if the argument is that they were,
I know, just... It's... The candies these half
measures about what kind tried didn't happen, but
then it went forward. Certainly could mean that
it was a clumsy narrative or becomes the
agenda,
But I just don't think that lines up
with what would normally happen.
But simply the same thing... He asked brief
the... Which you did.
But that could be for any number of
obvious reasons because clearly... And also to make
it seem as if he is being persecuted.
Right? But he says,
Dhs, which oversee secret service protected a detail,
quote, wasn't responsive to his request.
And he says when Biden regime behind the
attack,
Or was Biden Brian the attack or did
it deliberately do anything everything it could to
allow it to happen. This question. Ask those
questions,
certainly possible.
Jimmy Door highlights what useless tree says. I
live in a city where marine 1 used
to land.
George w and Obama for fundraiser. It witnessed.
It... And it's important actually. It witnessed its
first 3 hand... Its hand 3 times. The
secret service would search every... Excuse me, I
just didn't read that right. He witnessed it
first firsthand 3 times. The secret service would
search every newspaper stand,
put tarp over fences, have snipers on the
roofs of adjacent Apartment buildings have snipers looking
at windows of adjacent Apartment Buildings, all for
a marine 1 landing.
Not air force 1, Marine 1, walk to
the limo, the departure of motor cad and
took less than 5 minutes. They would tow
all cars from the adjacent lot, they would
switch the streets for mile for bombs at
previous day
for their not to have been a secret
service agent on this roof is a massive
tell. The rest of the story is even
worse.
I happen to agree with this. I mean,
there's just no way that could have been
forgotten about.
As Jimmy Do says, Trump was denied beat
of security and there weren't secret service on
the roofs surrounding the rally. Secret service ignored
people telling them. I mean, this is reminiscent
of, like a... I mean, what like a
Thing where they're, like, warning people and telling
them. They all seems very coordinated.
Secret
here,
Glenn Green highlights this point about
the depth... The actually you got the media
coming out. And a lot of paul politicians,
the pelosi of the world. Right? Coming out
and going, oh, I feel so I feel
for Trump, and this is not okay.
We should never allow this. Right? But 30
seconds ago, they were saying he was the
demo, the devil threat to democracy. Hitler and
body.
So now you you're happy Hitler's okay.
Like, the point is either they didn't mean
anything they were ever saying, which is really
where I usually lean. These are all just...
They're all just saying what they need to
say to get you to think what they
want you to think or to achieve their
own personal agendas. And a lot of them
do generally hate each other, but it's bigger
than that, or saying that he hope is
okay is the political moment.
Secretly hating him, but going out and going,
we hope he's okay because you know what's
gonna benefit you. Either way, Glenn says, I
still don't understand the response of democrat officials
and Liberal Pun. If Trump is Hitler, as
you can see things like this, ridiculous, The
new republic. Here's New York post. Mad, Ao,
among liberal media and Dan Lam, who worry
Trump will jail them in massive camps if
he wins,
jail them in camps. How stupid is that?
And it says, if Trump is Hitler, or
I I you shouldn't say not in the
sense that our government wouldn't do that, but
the idea of, like, a half narrative of
the Democrats, the Republicans. I mean, just... It's
in my opinion.
Wildly Naive. It's obvious that it's not 1
side or the other. But anyway, he says
if Trump is Hitler, who will build concentration
camps for his critics and who will build
these camps for his critics and permit another
never another election, all of which they claim,
why would they lament the attack and pray
for his recovery.
Seems really stupid doesn't it. And here's the
same point from Dave Smith. How the f
can you say he's literally Hitler and democracy
is on the line, but wish him a
speedy recovery. And political violence is never acceptable.
In fact, everything this government does is political
violence all around the world. Which says if
you have been saying any of that
insane stuff, then at least have their integrity
to admit that this is a logical conclusion
of your lies.
Yep. That's what our government does or our
media, they radical people and then pointed us
tell the truth for radical people.
Steve Miller, same point.
Democrat media at tonight is, thank god, Hitler
is okay and wishing Hitler Speedy recovery. Now
from his perspective, I think he's trying to
make it sound as if, no. It looks
like he is Fox News so they're just
making fun of him then. The point is
that you're calling a Hitler, but you're hoping
is okay. Pretty stupid.
Here
is Speaker Johnson.
The house will conduct a full investigation of
the tragic events today, which I guarantee will
amount to nothing unless it's about some kind
of show because these people never really seem
to do much. He says the American people
deserve to know the truth. The We will
have secret service director Kimberly Sc, and other
appropriate officials from Dhs and Fbi appear for
a hearing before our committee's Asap ap. As
Chris Martin says oh, hearing.
Or this person says anything else on Israel's
genocide or that's not getting any conversation. That's
Gerald S?
The point is, I don't Most republicans hate,
Mike Johnson. I don't think this guy is
even legitimate. All,
obviously, my opinion, they're all the same.
But the way this being presented,
I just... To me, this is a fruit
effort. If we've seen so many of these
ridiculous hearings that say a lot of things,
but nothing actually happens. Now whether c herself
gets thrown out of the bus, which is
usually how these things go, it never really
addresses the real picture.
That's usually what I expect. We'll wait and
see. But don't worry, guys. Don't worry. Everything's
out of control because the Fbi is taking
the lead. Does not make us feel better?
Why would it? You know, the Fbi that's
been manufacturing events since... Since it's existence. It's
creation. But the Fbi takes the lead on
the investigation of Trump.
The Fbi has assumed the role of lead
federal law enforcement agency investigating Donald Trump.
And as South the Ag says, every time,
say the wine, Fbi, he was on our
radar? How much you wanna bet we get
something like us soon enough. Yeah. We were
looking into them, and we had 3 meetings
with them, and we gave them some money
1 time. But yeah, But totally, we missed
it and, you know, pretty much every time
it seemed, but we'll wait and see.
No another overlap, interesting theory, which is a
lot of what this stuff is. Mo fit
tech trade says, is this why there was
an assassination attempt on Donald Trump just now?
Highlights this from before saying Trump's criticism of
Israel's Netanyahu,
draw strong condemnation from Gop rivals.
I don't think so, but it's something to
consider. Highlights My opinion is more likely that
they would do this to get him elected.
Right?
This is... I'll show you at the end.
This is driving
unparalleled support to Donald Trump. Just like I
said it would yesterday.
But 1 of the thing is to consider.
Certainly, that would be something they're capable of.
Now here is a really disgusting display from
corp Media Abc b, where they simply, as
you'd expect, we you know, from a partisan
perspective, but still important to highlight.
That essentially it's their fault. Right? Trump supporters
is their a dangerous rhetoric or what caused
this.
Pretty clearly if you're gonna take a partisan
inside it would be the fact that they're
calling in Hitler that would drive somebody to
do this if that's what really happened. Frankly,
I think it's far more likely the original
things we talked about in regard to this
being a government thing, or some kind of
a
staged idea. But listen to what they had
to say,
or
or we have to point out. No matter
who the shooter... What the shooter motives were,
no matter who the shooter is you going
to hear conspiracy theories going forward.
Now, right out of the gate. Now that's
the tail end of what they were talking
about. The next... Was where you get into
the next point, but
I just can't stand this conversation.
So what they're saying? Mind you, is at
a time when even they're admitting, you know,
developing situation. We're getting more information. We're still
flushing this out. And you come out and
go what about this possibility? And they like
go, conspiracy theory. You're not allowed to consider
that.
Even though we don't know what's happened yet.
Is that the most glaring example of how
stupid this all is, well, you don't even
know yet. And you're and you're out possibilities?
Even though it may seem... If the point
is, there are certain types of conversations that
they're just labeled as conspiracy.
You know, an at foreign government. Took action
and took him out unless they decide to
make that point.
It's just how this is how just...
They must be able to recognize how stupid
that is, took Now, order that dumb, I
don't know. But my point is,
obviously, theories about what's happening at a time
before we've figured it out are completely allowable
and they always are no matter what's going
on. You're allowed to consider alternative possibilities. Seeing
us how you guys are some of the
biggest misinformation spreader on the planet.
But here's the point they're getting No question
about that. But as as you... Point out
those statements from j Vance and Vi,
Of course,
president Trump and his supporters have have contributed
to this violent rhetoric as well. Well,
contributed to the violent rhetoric.
So all that all that is to say
is that... Okay. So what they say Might
have been behind what's going on you're a
played of part.
So
you're simply pointing out that in some way,
almost in a way saying, like, it's almost
justified. They didn't say that, but that you're
kinda of blaming the victim here, you understand.
That's what that is. And saying it they're
because of their rhetoric which they call dangerous,
which of course, they're mis, which is about
to read off about saying we're gonna bring
in bloodshed and danger. If you hurt... I'm
a no fan of trump, and I'm not
defending him because I don't think he's on
your side. But how often they just completely
mis what he says. Usually, what he's highlighting
is what they're doing,
you know, lying about this, destroying this election,
it's gonna bring blood and, like, he's talking
about that in an obvious and sense that
we can all see. That's gonna cause conflict.
Not to say that I'm am gonna cause
bloodshed because of what you're doing,
it's it's a it's a child like will
ignorance.
You can't pretend that's what he meant, but
they always do. Right? And so that's what
he's getting into and he's about to read
the things that are supposed to justify that
it's kind of their fault. Absolutely George Right.
We were just looking back this morning at
some of the things that former president Trump
has said. He warned last March a potential
death and destruction if you were charged by
the Manhattan district attorney. Our country is being
destroyed as they tell us to be peaceful,
Trump January warned a bed them in the
country if the criminal charges against him succeeded.
And, of course, in March,
He said, now if I don't get elected,
it's going to be a blood bath for
the whole. That's going to be the least
of it, it's going to be a blood
bath for the country. That will be the
least of it. He said he was partly
joking and that that was taken out of
context,
but those are indeed his words and you
have heard it from sir supporters as well,
and supporters are certainly in some parts angry,
and and let's remember January sixth. In so
many ways for the campaign,
January 6 will probably be in the background
after yesterday's
event. This is a very difficult time for
this campaign. I'm sure
this week in Milwaukee that President Trump will
highlight this,
and president Biden is gonna have to figure
out how to go forward or do this
campaign and what exactly they say.
Martha arthritis. Thanks very much Screen.
We have some interesting an interesting development to
the previous stories. But anyway, the... Just that
point right there is just simply, again, what
you're saying is... Today's event, this is a
very difficult time for this camp...
Overall, that, you know,
sea point.
Was trying to recap at the point, but,
you know, mentions January sixth constantly trying to
highlight that this is somehow, you know, their
dangerous rhetoric that caused this, which is just
it's very irresponsible to say that.
Here is what my brother just sent me.
This is being reported by Larry Elder. I
just looked this up. I wanna try to
find the actual article. Here we go. No.
Is that it?
Here's this report here.
What it's saying is apparently, a local police
officer, me check Google side of it as
well.
Doesn't seem to be coming up with that
exact.
Oh, yeah. This right here.
Okay. So the the gazette and a lot
of other platforms you just saw this from
Denver. Local officer encountered Gunmen just before he
shot Trump.
Wow.
So check this out. That's what it says.
And the the least and 1 officer climbed
to the roof, which is by the way,
what we keep hearing crude
encountered crooks who assuming me that's who this
is yet. I'm still. That's completely up in
the air seems, who pointed his rifle at
the officer
The officer then retreated down the ladder. The
ladder we just showed you by the way,
in the earlier in the show, and Crooks
quickly took a shot towards Trump.
My god, if that's actually true, that's either
the most shocking example of coward, but by
the way, we kinda tend to see a
lot with these school shootings if that's actually
what happened where they just don't go in
when they're supposed to. But again, you should
ask whether that was actually more of an
agenda. Just... I'm not saying I think that
that's just 1 of the possibilities.
My point is that my god. Either shocking
Coward as somebody whose job it is to
do with take action here
or that you were supposed to let that
happen. I don't really know. But here's what's
crazy is that this lines up with a
lot of what we've already heard. Multiple looking
for the guy without notifying secret service. There's
no way that lines up. Then this guy
actually goes up to where they're all pointing,
which does make sense. Seeing how they're all
like he's right there. He's right there.
The guy points at him, and he backs
away and that's when the shot fires. Now
how does that line up with the Snipers
on Trump's side?
Shooting first or looking in that same direction
or that Trump was facing the wrong direction
in his right ear with some hit while
this guy's on the other side?
I just doesn't really make sense to me.
Well share what this says. Not long before
shots running out, Rally goers noticed as a
man climbing the top roof at a nearby
building. And they, know, warren law enforcement. We've
already seen that. 1 officer climbed to the
roof and encountered him who pointed his rifle,
the officer went down the ladder, and then
he shot Trump, and that's when the Us
secret service counter
shot him.
But that doesn't seem to line up at
all with what we just saw. Said... And
this is according to the officials just spoke
with Ap.
Of course, on a condition of anonymity? Yeah.
That's that usually gives you a good feeling
of honesty doesn't it. Why would you be
speaking on a condition of anonymity about this
event? This is not some foreign policies
national security thing.
Doesn't that scream dishonest? I think we're being
lied to. I really do. Everything in me
tells me there's something about this. I don't
know what part All of it maybe that
we're being deceived about.
Here's what this says. Let's read this. Sources
tell Ip, the local a local law enforcement
officer and encountered the gunman same point, which
I of an attempt to kill Trump.
Shock leaders across the boulevard, a former fire
chief obtaining the rally with his family was
killed. Oh, wow.
Where that come from?
A former fire chief attending the rally. So
that maybe be only people that were killed.
2 other people were also critically wounded. So,
yeah. Apparently, that was the guy that was
killed if this report is accurate. Right? We
should be taking everything with the grain salt
right now, but that's a former fire chief.
The presumptive Republican presidential nominee said the upper
part of his right ear was pierced in
the shooting.
Okay. So here's what's interesting to me. We
already showed you these images.
Does that... Okay. Let's just grab that real
quick. Is that what that looks like to
you?
I believe I still have that. Hold on.
Hey. I don't have to go back and
grab it if I don't have it.
Yeah. I think that's the image I used
right here.
Yeah. Okay.
Now, okay. That's the small spot that we
were talking about right there that if that
that his hair is kinda covering. It but
that would be a pretty tiny nick on
the top of Cartilage. But again, that would
bleed like crazy. If you ever cut your
ear, you know that blade like a currently
breeze crazy. Bleeds crazy.
Your So it's saying,
it
his was... Ear was pierced in the shooting.
The upper part is right ear.
So does line up I guess if you
think that's what that shows right there, but
it's kinda hard to tell. Now another shots
it doesn't look like his ear is is...
It looks like his ears is intact into
the shots.
It's just just not just my perception. It
could be easily wrong. But it says, I
knew immediately that something was wrong in that
I heard a whiz sound.
Shots and immediately felt the bullet ripped through
skin. That was what Trump said.
Okay. Here's the the fire chief.
Marvel just send me this. We pray for
the loved ones and friends and former volunteer
fire chief, Corey,
comp comp
who was senseless killed at president Trump's rally
yesterday.
Okay. You know what what's actually was important
that actually... The archie he's wearing does seemed
to look like the shirt that was... I
was trying to look to see if I
could tell, like shirt and color of what
he was wearing. So that appear... Appears... You
know, with that isn't that straight by the
way, that would be the guy that Laura
Loom was pointing to when she said that
that was the shooter. See how that see
what irresponsible that is?
But my... Why why would they... It seems
like a weird thing to do to drag
him out like that to carry him as
arm and that why wouldn't they get a
stretcher? I don't know. This whole thing does
seems very strange to me. They was very
kind of disrespectful the way they carry that
body out.
Anyway, that's sad, random a person gets shot
behind this, especially if it's an agenda,
But back to this,
bullet ripped through the skin,
then it says much bleeding took place, which
by the way, did not. It really didn't.
There's very minimal blood when it comes to
what actually hook... What we can see. And
I was talking like well after the fact
when he's walking down the stage. At that
point, it would have been a lot in
my opinion. But again,
There's always another pop point to make. Maybe
he's taking medications that makes his blood not
bleed as... I don't know. There's always some
never jump to conclusions.
Right? We can talk about all kinds of
assumptions, but to we have to make sure
we always keep the door open for something
that might be an alternative. But it says
in a subsequent social post, he said, It
was Got alone we already highlighted. In this
moment it's more important than ever that we
stand united and show our true character as
Americans remaining strong and determined and not allow
evil to win.
Which I think is very clear will be,
whether it means it or not interpret it
as the Democrats.
His wife shared with me that he he
had done let's see, Fbi identify the shooter
as tap Thomas Matthew Crooks.
That's pretty much I guess that's just the
main part in the end. Yeah. And just
goes on in some background.
So the the point to say is it...
So
they're reporting, That 1 of these officers literally
walked up there and then walked back down
and allowed that shooting take place. That's a
pretty big deal.
If we had nothing else, you could just
call it Coward. And maybe it is.
But with everything else we're seeing,
that was
an whether by accident or not an a
allowable moment to carry out the event.
Something to consider.
And where were we here?
Oh, yeah. So back to this. So
blaming it on them was the point. You
know, the
racist republicans and their bad speech causing these
people to act. Right? Well no. That's that
would be your responsibility for the ones who
frame Trump and force people to think some
kind of living and embodiment ended into evil.
Which by the way, they do the same
reverse. Mind you.
But as she mentioned in January sixth, of
course, she's actually like, okay, That's gonna be
a back I backdrop the election now. With
why does that anything to do with anything?
Why because they're just trying to jam together
is that they're racist and that's all the
same thing, which is not in the case?
Let's remember why January 6 was so important?
Because
a failed false flag meant to blame Russia
and you as Americans using the Cia grown
As movement.
And I covered this again later, which I
simply made clear, January sixth was always a
very clear government operation. Now for those that
are may be just tuning in, I've never
seen the show before, recognize recognized, we will
not post these things if we can't prove
that. The source material is undeniable. And as
always, everything we say literally, chronological posted every
single link that we use to show you
in order is down there, which you could
check for yourself. The point this guys is,
it's not even ever debate. It's a joke.
Every Like, these are Oz member movements that
were there with them on the record that's
him next to Jake Chan. His name is
Sergey Bin...
Bin, I believe,
screaming, let's go go into the capital in
Russian. He's Ukrainian, which certainly there's an overlap
The point is this was an agenda. This
is the anti antifa guy or rather than
left leaning group guy that was on record
going. We got on. We did it. We
tricked them. It's all very easy to see.
The point is, they're still pointing that as
an event that's somehow an insurgent or whether
a guy direction.
And I think that was another event just
like we might be talking about today to
drive in the same direction.
Again, not from a partisan perspective guys, as
to a government
manipulation against you to get you as Americans
to play certain roles.
Now,
the last 2 sections, I think this one's
important in regard to...
What was this about again? Yeah. The and
people just
gus leaning into this.
All of a sudden, just like I told
you, like it's not hard to see, this
is driving support to Trump like I've never
seen. A lot of them already supported Trump,
but just to realize like major public endorsements
because of this. And Derek says I already
see the mainstream alternative media talking heads on
this platform celebrating the picture of Trump as
the most epic picture ever, which is just
all over the place.
Surviving an assassination attempt is a great way
to build up sympathy. He's right. Now he's...
That's not Derek saying we can prove that.
He's just making an observation, which people really
hate when it steps on what they want
to be the truth.
But this person is saying this, set up
to...
Where was it? Set up
by Trump to boost a stress
staggering low number. Biden is the same low
number group. Nobody likes them. They need to
set get support somehow. Marty them is a
good way to get that. Now, Don't know
if Trump has low numbers. I think at
least being presented as not the other, but
either way, point being
This is already driving a lot of support.
Here's Bill Act saying, I'm going to formally
endorse on Trump. I came to this decision
some ago as many twitter followers I've already
understood. For my supportive of post of Trump.
The reason why I have yet formally done
so is to explain my thinking and blah
blah law today because of this... I'm siding
with Trump is the point. I don't read
all the said. Bottom line is,
large accounts this guy what,
1300000.0
followers
that guarantee some of his followers are gonna
start supporting Trump. That's how this works.
Here is Elon Musk, showing the the clip
we showed. I fully into president Trump and
hope for his rapid recovery, which apparently is
in the hospital for a little bit, but
he's already out as far as I understand
it.
Here's Alex Jones. Here's what he has to
say about this. The world now needs to
pray for Donald Trump.
The deep state tried to kill president Trump
today.
Oh okay. Say case closed. We all got
it. Trump Alex knows. He said, Right? Deep
say did it, game over.
I mean, certainly, certainly.
But couldn't it be anything else? The deep
state did it? What does that even mean?
Like, I'm very aware of the reality behind
that talking point. We've been covering this for
a very long time. The reality of the
shadow governor or pell or parallel entities or
the supernatural national governments that run them The
point is,
Trump is a... Part of this game, and
I know that's hard for a lot of
people to recognize.
Whether he knows or not by the way.
Are actively progressing the agendas of exactly the
deep state he's pointing to.
Or global and the things they're highlighting while
ignoring the real obvious entities. They're driving the
worst things in the world
but the Deep safe did it. They tried
to kill him.
I just don't I just feel like it's
almost too much to just...
I don't don't know why people lean into
these Id logs and just go well, he
said it, and that's the case. People are
sharing this like that's gospel.
Certainly a possibility. Don't Why can't we be
more objective than that and just lean into
people we want to be because team sport
politics, but anyway, let him continue. They actually
shot him in the south of head. No.
They shot him in the ear. But because
our God is greater they're God we want.
Oh, okay. So our gods is better than
their God. We won.
Journalism.
I mean, what does this have to do
with that at all? What are you... What...
Who's God?
I talking about the deep state, as if
they all kind of unanimously have 1 God
maybe,
I'll very clearly overlap that with the idea
of, like, this kind of sun... Like this
techno
direction and that they are Courtney and I
was just talking about this. The idea that
they are certain, like, essentially becoming God themselves?
Or are you talking about Zion. That would
make sense, but that's not what he's talking
about.
My point is our gods that in their
God will make... Will mean whatever anybody listening
to this wants it to mean.
Whether you're you're in your mind, it's the
Democrats first, the Republicans and it's... My our
god versus their atheism and devil worship or
the idea that you're talking about China or
Russia or whatever.
Very Trump es answer isn't it write down
that you can read into that or very
q if you want. Read into it, However
you wanna read it. But how in the
world are you gonna make an argument that
our gods is better than their God, And
that's why we won,
from a journalist perspective.
I've at this point all the time, guys.
I am a Christian.
I do not hide that.
But in in inter entertaining your reporting with
religion.
I don't respect that because you're talking about
a faith based reality that you're inter with
things that require evidence,
those things are not con... Those things are
contradictory.
So I am humbly.
Asking all the viewers. Humbly.
On and info wars
to pray for president Trump pray for America.
This is a spiritual battle that we're facing.
I don't even disagree with that, but you
guys can watch the rest if you want.
I just... I have... I just... You know
my opinion.
I hope I'm wrong.
III don't want this to be the case
that where all people are just so deceived
by these clear manipulator.
Oh my god. I just don't know why
we can't recognize that these... What they're doing
is driving you directly into the grass into
the jaws of the problem.
I hope we can start to see that.
Here,
Wall Street Silver,
post this saying rise and rise again until
lambs become lions, You know, because of biblical.
It's prophecy.
Wall Street silver.
Really?
I mean, this is a little bit alarming,
guys, a lot of bit alarming. Censored man
highlights what ian Myles Armstrong said when kind
of making fun of the fact that he's
not we at all. He says, we are
at war. They killed 1 of us today.
And he goes, he tweets from Malaysia.
Right like.
We...
But the point is the way that they're
framing this, and I see this guy as
a clear manipulator.
He says we are in a battle for
humanity, fight.
It's real. We are now in a war.
This is all based all under Elon Musk
and other the people talking about Trump.
I'm a million. I'm 1000000 percent behind Trump
now. We are at war. Like, guys,
if somebody tried to kill Trump, and it's
exactly what happened that still is not immediately...
That this is
irrational irresponsible. You are driving people to do
irrational things. We're war with who exactly?
How will we identify who's responsible for you
jump conclusions and go, we're at war.
They wanna kill you who exactly the democrats.
That's usually where this ends up.
Where just going the other part of the
country trying to kill you guys. We are
being driven against each other, while we're ignoring
so many other things going on.
He says they killed 1 of us today
as in the person behind them in the
crowd.
Who's they?
What if it was Israel? Will you call
that out? What if it was China, What
if was Russia? What if it was your
own government? What if it was a Republican
that doesn't like Trump? Who cares? Let's just
make it what we want it to be
before we know what's going on. We'll scream
a rational pla that want emotionally driven.
What I don't know why people can't see
this. I know I think I'd like to
believe most do. I'm talking about the people
that choose to be in the paradigm.
And then he said this.
Please, please please triple your protection, Elon Musk.
If they can come for Trump, they will
come for you. Oh right. Because they're both
leaders of this movement. Right? They're both freedom
fighters screaming about free speech while they're doing
the opposite.
Please law and triple your protection. I I
just... We just talked about this.
Is he not... It does same point. These
people are not on your side. He says
dangerous times ahead. 2 people separate occasions have
already tried to kill me in the past
8 months. They were arrested with guns about
20 minutes drive from Tesla headquarters.
Michael Sc because that's awful. Very sorry to
hear that glad you're k.
Perry rio world a war. Same point. That's
the lunch email armstrong. Here is Luke. Stay
safe, man. We need you.
Here's Derek Pros for some logic. Okay. Oh,
god. More asking for the mist trans.
S l says it's the massage.
Aaron Elizabeth says praying for you and please
get a edit protection.
I just... I... I'm always have... I hate
this kind of thing. Even if I have
these feelings, I don't feel a need to
jump to be 1 of the people to
say the thing they're underneath like, you... We're
behind you a hundred percent.
Just
I. I may have a mean person. I
didn't think this is silly stuff that. But
and in of course, it's all that... You
know what this is about being... I wanna
be seen as the person going yay.
Elon. I'm with you, man.
Even though you're sensory people and lying about
it. Even though you're part of the great
reset. Yeah. Where with you?
Alright. Left point. But
then I'll add
on the point of censorship. I just highlighted
This just... I think it's just a overlapping
point.
He was just on Bill Maher saying, we
can't sensor things we disagree with because that
will be wrong,
And I Rightly said, what a joke? It's
just so sad. How many choose to fall
for this over at lie while people are
un being censored and best on this platform.
Not for breaking the law, as you pretend
was the bar or breaking in terms of
service, but for simply uncomfortable truths. Right now,
largely around Israel in their lives. Best This
person says sure.
It's not true for speech, but it's a
lot better than it was.
Oh, yeah. Gotta love that argument. And I
simply posted this meme. Of the aztec text
going, well, you know, may not be a
perfect system, but it's sure the best 1
there is as they're ripping the heart of
the person's chest above them.
I love that meme.
Chris that's the same thing. Well, it's not
exactly perfect. Well, you know what? I demand
perfect. If perfectly means it's constitutional rights.
I'm not gonna go, well, you know, they
kinda let you acknowledge so. You're rights. It
was better than it was yesterday.
Maybe you're right. I still don't think it's
okay.
I still wanna call out the person who's
giving you half of what they should.
I just don't know why people ponder these
things. Now, lastly,
the government side of this and really just
the the promotion the drive the things here's
Biden
on the thirteenth, not wasting time,
I wanna ban assault weapons and require universal
background checks. Trump promised in rna, r
that he'd do nothing about guns, and he
needs it.
Now as far as I understand, this is
before that happened. Weirdly times. Is it not?
Here's Trump?
Back in 20 23. Just in case you
forgot before we jump to conclusions about who's
gonna take your guns away.
President Trump's stunned lawmakers on both sides of
the aisle Wednesday with his overarching demands for
gun control. To take the firearms first. And
then go to court it. After vice president
Mike... Yeah. Right. Take the guns, and then
we'll deal with the court stuff later. We'll
deal with constitutional rights after we get what
we want. You know, freedom, though. Second amendment.
Trump. Pence suggested court procedures for removing guns
from dangerous people,
Trump caught him and many in the room
off guard by seeming to dismissed due process.
I like taking the guns early. So you
could do exactly what you're saying, but take
the guns first, go through due process second.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Will just do process, You
know, we'll deal with that pesky little thing
after the fact. After we take your guns
without any legal rush of. I mean, my
god. Yeah. And a lot of us called
it out then. I mean, and the of
course, it got dismissed as misunderstanding or mis
misrepresented, but it really was not. It's obvious
what he said. Now another point, here's the
Persian Jewish highlighting. Then Remember,
and, yes, this is related to what's going
on with Trump. Do you have a lot
of an Israel overlap right now trying to
use this for their purposes, which we should
be asking whether it might be involved. Says
Bobby Kennedy was assassinated by 24 year old
Palestinian Terrorist Surround ser, which make sure you
understand that is not the reality when he
was running for president in 19 68. As
Bobby Kennedy. The president, the Palestinian terrorist
allegedly targeted R in retaliation for a board
of Israel.
You know? Or there's a lot more to
the story involving Israel being upset that the
candies were seeking to expose the Israeli demon
nuclear laboratory as well as to force Apa
pack to registers a foreign agent Jfk was
shot putting an end to it followed by
Bobby, you know, or that.
Now, of course, it didn't show the image.
I wanted to show you in just case
you didn't see that interview. Interview court Hughes
where we talk about it,
entitled,
was k assassinated by Israel,
or was Israel behind Southeast of Jfk as
you get that image is funny.
It's a good interview. Important. It's that contentious.
Point being,
putting this out, after that happened, kinda going
reminder,
Palestinian Bogey man probably were responsible because Trump's
sports israel. That's what she's doing.
Lot of facts there.
In fact, no facts at all, bunch of
narratives and lies, but
here's what Mac Said. On Fox News just
now. This was yesterday. Not even today it
was that... The day this was happening. Former
Ny inspector, Paul Mara
mu
Just suggested,
campus Palestinian
activism was responsible for the assassination attempt on
Trump.
And called for a federal investigation into student
activism against Israel's
genocide. He then warned against conspiracy theories, which
is like literally what you're doing.
The bottom line is we've already verifiable shown
that if the AAA
very large portion of these protests are Jewish.
Led by Jewish organizations
that they just call self Jews or whatever,
Zion. I mean, the point is that we've
seen holocaust survivors. And I mean, and they
lied top to bottom about every 1 of
these.
And now you're just shooting I guarantee somebody
pushing to do that. There's no logical reason
to connect those things. Somebody went and pushed
him to make that statement. That's my opinion.
And here's netanyahu yahoo couldn't help himself. Guess
what?
He doesn't just go. I'm sorry, Trump, that's
a bad thing. He says we're all here
to. This is about all of us. Right?
It's a to attack on all of us
together.
I just find that ridiculous. It's... I don't
know if they recognize it or rather specifically
Netanyahu
recognizes his ridiculous Hub. Or the idea that
you you're talking about an attack on somebody.
You're trying to put on a video to
show solidarity and your point is
we're all... It's all of us
we have... What's says tackled on us too.
It's is funny to me. You got what
I'm saying? Like, it's if the wrong stands
to take when you're trying to make a...
Because if you're... You're showing solidarity. The point
is He... He's trying to make it about
Israel's thing too. And I think there might
be more to this than we realize.
Call israelis,
my wife, Sarah and I were shocked by
horrific
assassination attempt on the life of President Donald
Trump.
This wasn't just an attack on Donald Trump.
This was an attack, on a candidate for
the presidency of the United States.
This was an attack on America. It was
an attack on democracy. It was an attack
on all the democracies.
Alright. So it's not just your thing. It's
our thing. It's all of our. We have
of myself, my family, the government and people
of Israel.
We wish president Trump. A speedy recovery, continued
good health
and continued
strength.
Alright. So attacking a guy... Who carry our
operation warp speed, un unconstitutional forced a lot
of shots on people who despite around that
and bind into the same. And the point
is that's a attack on democracy.
You know, the same democracy that both sides
accused of cheating every single time or the
same democracy that completely ignores every single actual
writer or every single law or international or
otherwise.
Democracy. Right? But an attack on 1 of
these dictators is an attack on democracy. That's
what he's saying. Why? Because they're all upholding
this narrative about rules based international order, as
they're all some of the worst people in
the planet.
Here is the president of Israel.
He says, I'm shocked by the shooting at
the 40 fifth president of the United States
trump. I pray for a speedy recovery, violence
can never be a part of politics.
Right. Kill 16000 children, but violence can never
be a answer. Right? Trump
I mean, the... This is what they're supposed
to say. You're literally using... You're, like, politically
acting to murder an entire
entity and entire civilization.
For your own political agenda.
But, you know, violence can never be the
answer.
Unless it's on us and the people we
hate though, you know?
It's just... It's a pla. It's just what
they're supposed to say. Embarrassing. Now here is
what Biden said.
I'll play it first.
Tried to get a hold of Donald,
he's... With his doctors.
They, apparently, he's just doing well.
I plan on talking them shortly. I hope.
I when I get back to the telephone.
Look.
There's no place in America for this kind
of violence. It's sick.
It's sick.
It's 1 of the reason why we have
unite this country. You cannot allow for this
to be happening. We cannot it's be like
this. We cannot condone this. And so, and
I wanna thank the secret service and all
the agency including the state agencies that have
been engaged and making sure that people who
and we have more detail to come relative
to other... Other people maybe be injured in
the audience. They don't have all that detail.
We'll make that available to you. And may
be able to come back a a little
later tonight, but we'll put out a statement
if we don't, if I'm not able to
give the for... If it's not convenient for
you all. But the bottom line is,
that the Trump rally was a rally that
he should have been able to could be
conducted peacefully without any problem.
But the idea. The idea.
That there's political violence or violence in America
like this is it's just unheard. It's just
not appropriate. And we everybody... Everybody must condemn
it.
Everybody. I'll keep you informed and if I
able to speak to the to Donald, I'll
I'll let you know that as well. So
far, it appears
He's doing well. Number 1. Number 2, that
there's thoroughly investigating what happened to anyone else
in the audience. I have... We have
summary reports but not final reports.
And every agency in the federal governor. And
I'm going back
to my phone to speak with.
The federal agencies that are being put together
again to give me an updated briefings and
they happened. They learned more in the last
couple hours.
So thank you very much, and I hope
I get to speak till them tonight, and
I'll get you back to you if I
do.
And how halal flow says Biden can apparently
condemn a violent attack. There's no place in
America for the kind of violence. It's sick.
Would be great if he could have done
the same on the violent A safe zone
attack, 96 palestinians were killed, which is real
and netanyahu brag about today.
That's what I talked about yesterday, oh, in
between other stuff, but not a word about
that or the any... The un...
I'm inn.
Amount of other atrocities that have happened in
the last 9 plus months.
No issue about that though. Right?
Here the Cradle highlights. Israel Jets bombard
Syria. That's that's over from yesterday into today.
Bombing damascus. That's... Israel is bombing damascus in
in civilian neighborhoods now. Which is not new.
It's been going on for a very long
time, but now you're just drawing it. You're
bombing another location while pretending you're being attacked.
Syria not bombing you, You're not attacking you
but you're bombing Syria because clearly, this is
not about you being the victim. But of
course, no room for political violence in our
democracy.
Netanyahu says,
Piece people are a laughing stock. Their jokes.
Ti highlights. News. Us bomb kills 20000 Palestinians.
Us bombs.
Obama, Nothing.
News, The figure is now 40000 half of
them children. Obama nothing. News. Children limbs, jaws,
heads are being blown off with Usb emissions
munitions live of the world Obama nothing. News,
Almost 200000 now fear dead all nothing. News.
Trump shot in the ear, Obama. There's absolutely
no place for political violence in our democracy.
Although we don't yet know exactly what happened.
We should all be relieved that former Trump
wasn't seriously heard and use this moment to
rec ourselves to civility and respected our politics,
Michelle and I, You get the point.
Funny how you only care? Everyone it has
to do with your elitist weapon or a,
you know, parasite
class, whatever you everyone wanna call them.
Which they're all the part of? All of
them laughing and yuck it up at their
speaker parties that we can see plenty of
images of it. The point.
Clearly,
if there's no place for political violence and
our democracy, then why exactly are you in
you're you in particular
carrying this out about inside this country, but
also,
abroad.
That's part of this democracy actions you carry
out around the world, but also the fact
that you carried out for in particular, a
lot of really damning things in this country
from the Nda for locking up Americans indefinitely
without determining all sorts of things.
No place though because you're going after 1
of us. That's the point.
And he also says,
same point before, you know, that he's 1
of the people that's called Trump, like the
biggest director democracy. But, yeah, But, thank god.
Okay, though.
Really makes sense. Doesn't it. And as highlights
and this is regard to what's going on
in Israel, in general, though, he says she
said I repeat. A vote for Trump is
a vote for Zion genocide Palestinians, but so
too is Biden, so too is are jfk
okay. Just making a point.
She highlights this after 52 years it is
time for the United States to fully recognize
Israel's sovereignty over the Go heights. She's you
know, that entirely
illegal,
unjust action.
In fact, just to be clear, in case,
you don't know that, the Us president or
the Us government has no legal jurisdiction to
do that. Nobody cared.
Trump recognizes Jerusalem as israel's capital at same
point. Do not have the legal right to
do so. Rent And this says unlike the
white leftist that receive endless praise from
Ao stands for holding up cardboard pla and
resisting f.
And she says, Jackson Hi is solidly anti
zion Anti Global. And she's saying that response
to Mar Os
who says,
You see what I mean, only a hip
would endorse a terrorist.
That's that's an ankle,
going,
God was looking out for America and president
Trump today. Oh, you mean the same guy
that you 30 seconds ago, we're saying is
just destroying... You know, is... But look, the
point is that these people are openly openly,
supporting Israel genocide. Jackson Hi has been presenting
himself as a very count a resistant aspect
of that.
Pushing back against us saying, you're committing genocide,
calling and a lot of people have highlighted
is sort of a manipulation. I don't know
you can decide yourselves. And of course, flirting
with that line to make it all of
jew. It can all but because I think
that's a trap.
And clearly, mar does too. Saying, you don't...
She says shake my head and you trust
him by the thousands. Shame on all of
you especially the she who witnessed this terrorist
assassinate,
sole money. That's Trump.
You're not forgetting to celebrate this hi hip
grip for posting a photo of a come
community. Not like a week or 2.
And the point is this person responded simply
going.
He's more than that. And he's better on
the point is just be... It's a very
clearly partisan thing talking about, you know, the
people with their... Pluck in front of f
chinos and the point is clearly, it's wildly
hypo critical to sue be like, yay, Trump
is okay. Well, you're literally calling out the
other things that there is part of. Like,
you can clearly go god. I'm glad as
a human being that he's not killed. But
I find it really odd, God was looking
up for America.
That seems... Contradictory to what other things he
is saying. That's my personal opinion. But she
said again, I repeat. A vote for him
is a vote for Genocide, but apparently, Hi
is okay being contradictory there. Contradictory but severely
highlights to finish the show in general. While
everyone ob obsessive about Trump's ear being hit,
the bump relentless bombardment on the northern part
of Gaza City and the Genes genocide continues.
This is today. Mind you, this continues.
They're literally relentless mostly bombing civilian locations. They're
not even narrative flying around anymore. This is
just massacre after massacre right now. And now
they've got plenty of people looking somewhere else.
Maybe that was the point. I highly doubt
that's the only point, but something to consider.
This is what's going on.
Children are being bombed every day.
Ram abdul from Y med human rights Group
says breaking Israel bombed not,
another. This is today,
another United Nations schools, sheltering displaced people in
A.
It's like they go back and forth. Third
How many times do they bomb schools and
buildings in El The place they keep saying
is secure
or the place they alternatively tell them to
go for the safe area?
As just so disgusting how obvious this is.
Our teams have documented the victims, all of
whom are civilians. Vast majority being children and
women, the vast majority.
You're not gonna repeat about this because the
media cycles consume donald Trump.
Britney says sometimes the people who think they
the most awake
are the most si.
Si
as a
psychological
operation. I agree
That doesn't mean that they might not be
awake in some cases the point is that
what people that are convinced that they're... Like,
this is what I always said about the
queue at on point
or Russia gate I think are kind of
2 legs of the same agenda personally,
is that they get you they get you
that you you wake up to a degree.
You see the bigger issue, and you turn
around, you take a step into a minefield.
And people like us over here going, don't
pick so. Don't pick something, just keep your
just keep that open as going. Keep that
objectivity going. Don't pick a new side. Keep
moving and question everything. And usually, they get
pulled into a new trap, which was q.
And they've suddenly they're like, we see everything.
We now see the truth and and they
get... And they're being manipulated by the next
step at the agenda. That's how this works.
And that's the point is be people are
convinced 1 step away from the controlled idea
that they're now part of the awakening. They
see everything
and they're just barely.
Barely away from the original lie.
That's easy to manipulate people to think they're
completely awake. When in reality they barely see
anything.
You could argue that's us for all we
know. It's certainly possible. The point is to
try to recognize it could always be you.
Be objective. Question everything.
Oh, this was just the last... 0II do
wanna include that the show notes.
So
I personally think that this is a a
pretty good overview of the stuff we currently
have in front of us. Right? There's a
lot of information. And I guarantee you as
we were talking, There's probably been 15 new
things that have popped up.
But at we're at this point in time,
I think it's very obvious. That there the...
Largely the partisan media.
They would clearly, as they do every time
have shown themselves to be
irresponsible dishonest, fly just or just not don't
care. And that's not everybody. There's people that
are even in the partisan media that clearly
are acting objectively, but I argue just in
my opinion being partisan of tends to
drive you to omit certain things you don't
like because it hurts your side. But either
way, my point is that what we've seen
from the ones that I usually highlight
that they're being dishonest guys that they're sharing
things. They're lying if not purposely,
which is muddy the field, which is causing
this to be easily manipulated.
So just as always, as you all hear
do no beat, show discernment,
be very skeptical of what we're saying of
what they're saying what everybody is saying,
try to gather the information and show a
measured approach and come to your own conclusions.
It's very important.
I think overall, what we can see is
there's
undeniable anomalies here. There's... My... The 1 I
keep coming back to you is how in
the world he was shot. Unless there was
a second shooter, while his head was turned?
Or why was the sniper set up there
not able to do... See what was happening
when clearly they would have? Or people that
were searching for them that were told by
multiple people to do something about it didn't
or the guy that walked up and then
came back down and let it happen or
the inconsistency of the shots of when they
say that they were shot over here versus
when they say they saw him shot over
here,
something's being lied about.
I personally think that's undeniable at this point.
Over But again, newer things could come up
that we can verify that might fill those
gaps, so we should be okay with that.
So let's be objective and wait to see
where come out, But I think right now
it's undeniable. That there is something going on
here. And either way, this will be used.
It will be used by everybody to achieve
what they want from it.
Keep that in mind.
So thank you for tuning in.
Thank you for remaining objective questioning this information
because I'm telling you guys they are desperate
to drive you to choose the side.
Drive you to pick what narrative you like
from within their chosen and controlled narratives.
What we do ending a show right now
where we're saying, yeah. We don't know. We
don't know yet. We're still figuring it out
is honestly what they're most afraid of. Making
sure that people retain their objectivity. Not is
something they're desperately trying to hide or remove
or attack
everywhere, and you know it. You feel it.
It's all across the conversation. So thank you
for remaining objective and continuing to stand up
and,
I don't know change people's minds. It's having
an effect. I feel it. And that's why
we're being attacked. That's why everybody in this
position that is actually doing this is constantly
being suppressed and attacked and censored and not
in some halfway that actually drives up their
numbers. But in a legitimate way that most
people don't even see.
So thank you for tuning in And if
you like to support us as it's happening,
there's lots of way to do so beneath
the videos, the show notes?
There's lots of platforms you could support us
on. There's stripe on the website or
objective reporting,
program that we have on autonomy. That's all
down below as well. You know, it's it
it's a it's a little... The the the
point is that's an important course to take
for you know, trying to keep train your
mind to maintain objectivity, which is more difficult
than people realize. But either way, whatever you
wanna do, however you support us, we appreciate
it. That means the world.
Thank you for being here. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.