There is another very important phase of Warfare.
It has as its target,
not the body.
But the mind of the enemy.
The target psychological warfare
is against the enemy's mind.
It is words and Idea.
Ammunition is used by a 5.
Its mission is to influence the thoughts of
the enemy enemy's soul. And at the same
time is expected and encouraged to study foreign
languages and the social sciences such as history,
economics and soc sociology.
He must have a broad distinguished
understanding of all phases of human experience.
Grip
at my skin.
Of night closing.
While the use of this force has an
integral part of combat has now taken on
new 4.
These are the side soldiers.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Tuesday, 07/16/2024,
thank you for joining me today. Important follow
ups show,
largely around the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
A lot of information we covered both the
an moment it happened going live with different
content and covering some different points. The follow
ups show the next day.
Most of what we discussed within that. III...
We're gonna get into. I still feel holds
is sound. And there's a lot of different
points in that there were that were...
Up at, like, basically, the first show we
did the full 1 talking about, let's find
the facts. The entire premise of the show
was about the idea that this is on,
you know, things are developing. Even to this
very moment, there's lots of up stuff in
the air, which is kinda shocking to be
honest. A lot of misinformation flying around. And
so the point was that we're... Going through
this and being objective and keeping in mind
that as I said many times in the
show that
tomorrow, something could pop up that could add
to it, fill the gap and suddenly things
make more sense. And so I wanna go
through some of those important points, 1 of
which I think is really important about the
angles, that I do feel like I was
a little bit off on the angle that
we were seeing and things have come out
that have really flushed that out. But I
wanna reiterate
that I still think this point is very
important around the location of the shot and
so on. But I... I'll tell you right
now out of the gate.
I feel that the evidence so far
very clearly points in the direction of clearly
there was a shooting, and clearly that this
is
the the 2 likely things in my mind
or that this was a genuine
assassination attempt that either came from somebody der
hating trump, Somebody inside
that wouldn't be too shocking to see our
government take somebody out or or ultimate, you
know, or I'm really a foreign entity involvement
kind of a thing. But they're still no
reason we should shut out other possibilities.
In 1 of the things I'm seeing that
really frustrate me and from people that in
other contexts.
Are very willing to entertain and highlight... Like,
and I'm not talking about pointing at things
that we can't verify with, like, nothing to
back it up, but, like, the idea that
there's a data point. And if we would
theo about this and say okay, this could
mean this. This could mean that. And because
this is sort of an emotional topic, people
that I wouldn't expect coming out and saying
that. E, that's you know,
disrespectful, or we shouldn't be jumping to conclusions.
Or we shouldn't stop with the conspiracy theories.
At a time when we have yet to
fully flush out the story.
And Regard to the shooter itself. I do
think that the person that they're naming at
least with the evidence that's in front of
us. I'll explain why there was the discrepancy
between the 2 people. I think it's really
interesting. And Yeah. It it has to do
it with the corporate media mistake as well.
But we're gonna go through a lot of
that information again. And as far as in
my opinion is just continues to unravel. More
and more pointing to at at the very
least and a shocking amount of incompetence or
will disregard from the secret service. It I
reached out to the field office of a
couple places today. Spoke with the Sa at
Nashville, And I'll, tell you what he said.
It's pretty 1
2 simple quotes. In regard to the
protocols around,
secret service.
We also have a discussion about some interesting
anomalies we'll talk but I talked to Derek
Bros briefly earlier today, which I'll play for
you around...
I mean, it's
very well could be a coincidence,
but but it'd be really hard to... It's
it'd be a pretty,
like mathematically,
wildly unlikely coincidence that there was actually a
discussion on the ninth of July
about this taking place in Pennsylvania and an
assassination attempt, which I just find interesting. So
we want to talk about that. We'll we'll
discuss that early. I really wanted to go
through a lot of these different points and
highlight again
why it's very clear, like, the dispute that
there is inconsistencies in this story, which
Again, same point this is the other day.
They're very well, maybe something that comes out
that fits right there that makes that all
make sense, and we should still question whether
that was too convenient. It really frustrate people
that we continue to ask questions.
Even though that's supposed to be what journalists
do, whether you're a journalist or a reporter
or an aggregate information, these things are very
important. So we're gonna go through that. We're
gonna talk about each of the
continuing anomalies that are popping up, the secret
service and they're...
Justification. If you call that about around why
there wasn't somebody in this location, The security
parameters perimeter are made had a whole lot
of different things. So make sure you stay
tuned for all of it, Also gonna talk
about Israel in a latter half in regard
to what continues to go on.
Excuse me. And and overlapping that with Jd
Vance.
And the kind of 2 party illusion part
of this in the middle and how the
Israel overlap to Jd Bands, the sort of
hate Trump hatred from him and how this
all seems to tie together and how all
of that is covering up what's going on,
the ongoing genocide against Palestine.
Those be real, guys. This is not just
God's. A West bank seems to be focused
on more and more day by day. And
I've still yet to go through that main
focus, which I still have off to the
side,
as well as a whole bunch of stuff
I wanna get to around the
the specific point I was talking about 4
bi bacteria and different aspects immune system, All
those I will get to. I have them
lined up you know, assuming my computer doesn't
die like I did before, and I lose
all that information, but we will be talking
about it. Very soon in the next so
many shows,
Now that video open with by the way,
That is a side... That's side war video
put out by the Us army. That's that
is their video that they put out, which...
I don't even know what the purpose was,
is that to want make you want to
join the military. So my point is showing
at to start is simply just to recognize
that this idea,
that your government
would be willing to manufacture events lie about
things, psychologically
manipulate people
it's not... I mean, not only is it
not Far fetched. They're literally
advertising about it. In order, I guess to
try to get you to want to join.
Or just to show you what they're doing
or suggest that. I mean, but just realize
how alarming that video was very creepy
people in the background with the white mask,
like some horror movie. The end of the
day, the the important thing to realize. And
that's not even to say that I think
for sure that this was something that was
officially
you know, in in the concept... Context of,
like, being staged or or lied about for
other reasons than just trying to
allow an assassination to him to take place.
We should not be dismissing that. There is
still a many points that that
continue to suggest that there's more than just
the
nefarious act of trying to assassinated president, which
is enough to be concerned about. That's news
enough.
But I want us to keep that in
mind.
The idea that it's not that far fetched
to recognize it even going through our history
that our government would do something like this
that an individual candidate would do something like
this or a foreign government, would do something
like this. So keep those in mind.
So we're gonna go through this now and
Gonna start with the
shout out actually to the last ones we
discussed.
And I will go through this again because
I wanted to address specifically that 1 point,
that I I got a lot of pushback
from from certain people around that 1 point,
which I find interesting around the angles, which
I'm gonna go through very... Explicitly today. And
I still stand by the idea that I
do not think that the the the alignment
of where that shot supposedly hit his ear
I I just don't think this lines up,
and I still don't. Even even with the
difference of the angles, and we'll also get
into the weird overlap of some of these
anomalies in regard to even the the
independent and right media around these points about,
for instance, that there are... There's there's there's
2 sets of diapers that are involved with
this discussion. Not just the 1 and the
spotter, but we're talking about 2 separate locations
on trump's side, which a lot of you
know, but that seems to continue to be
missed with these
arguments about well, here's the sniper and here's
this and then sort of leaving out the
other dynamic with the other sniper, and the
timing of the shots.
Which I still stand by on that as
well. I find this to be really interesting
around the angles and the timing of who
shot first and I... Even and then again,
back to the overlap of the person,
the time the the the...
Prep... That what happened first? Where he came
from what he was carrying and all these
different anomalies that just simply to me, don't
add up. And the lack of information coming
from people right now is kind of
unbelievable. There's times in the past where you
get this stuff in... I mean,
near instantaneously,
obviously, usually when it's in their interest. But
at this point, it's kinda hard to believe
we have not got information about, you know,
what exactly the kind of rifle that was
used that how many shots were fired. I
mean, there's a lot of guessing,
especially around the protocol aspect, which I will
talk about. I find that to be most
interesting around this argument now that Ben Shapiro
claims real politics claims, like this third second
hand relayed information through a source. They know.
That apparently the secret service is not allowed
to fire first,
which I don't think... I mean, I I
in the, Am, wake, wake up show this
morning. And I straight so I just simply
do not believe that. The idea that they're
supposed to wait for someone to shoot before
they shoot. And I mean that's... So let's
go ahead and try to assassinate him, and
then we'll shoot hoping you didn't hit him
first. Does that even make sense to anybody
and we'll touch on that at where where
it's relevant.
Here's the show we went over on the
fourteenth. Trump assassination attempt let's review the facts.
And I the... I tend to have a
title like that when there's a an a
situation like this where I wanna break it
down, talk about what I think we can
prove. And that's not... It's also including...
My different perspectives and theories and I'm always
very clear about where I'm going into my
opinion.
And at any point in these time frames,
there's always going to be stuff that we're
going well. We don't know and there's have
to wait for more information, you know, we
go into the different discussions, and, of course,
I have opinions at that point that I
may be passionate about, but realize that it's
very clear that we're talking about things that
are still developing.
Right? I think that's important. There's a big
difference between hypo sizing about information and coming
out and saying, this is what happened and
then deleting it, not addressing that later. And
a lot of the people that are involved
in these breaking points of these stories have
already deleted multiple things over the last few
days.
Again, they the original point about. Highlighting what
they claim was a person named Mark Violence,
I think was Mark, who turned out to
be a guy named V who lived in
Italy.
Wasn't an antifa member was a podcast and
just, you know, it's that if that kind
of be responsible reporting or rather just jumping
new conclusions, which by the way, they have
right to do that needs to be called
out.
This show, I hope you watch. I stand
by everything in this. I think there's important
information in there, breaking down a lot of
things that I still don't think a lot
of people are touching on.
And then I wanna highlight Derek amazing article
about this that came out the next day.
We must question the tenth assassination of trump.
As always, Derek do an amazing job being
objective as possible. And really breaking down what
we can prove. And, you know, even gonna
you know, going into the narrative of the
court... The kind of the mainstream narrative and
highlighting the different points, the the... And even
getting into some of them men aren't, The
idea of the possible second shooter, which seems
to be continually growing and frankly,
Again, this is... Day by day, it seems
to get more likely in my opinion, but
I still don't think I'm convinced 1 way
or the other
about what happened at all, quite frankly,
But make sure you read this. A great
article. Was a lot of good information in
there and I believe he's gonna follow up
with that.
Now, I wanna start with this.
So this is really interesting to me. So
this is the actual link or technically this,
it's weird did it's not. Oh, that's too
bad. Let me do this real quick.
So the actual link
is in the show notes because it looks
like right there, it was show... Just had
the link of the homepage. That's weird.
Oh, so that's interesting. So apparently, I didn't
know that. So you can't play the street
the spaces on the spaces link.
Yeah. You have to go play it, look
at that anyway. So once you get it
to the place where you can play it,
the link show homepage.
Oh, now it's gone? Dang it.
What is going on here?
Either way, I have it recorded, but see,
I to change my window space to find
this bottom thing son of a gong.
Sorry for the podcast.
Here it is popping up for the right,
but you see what I'm saying for this
those to view, it says homepage. And, that's
very strange to me. Anyway, so I'm gonna
start with this. It was a podcast array...
Excuse me, a spaces that came out as
you can see on 7 9. Now this
has been circulating. People have already pointed this
out. Now I'm not even trying to say
this is anything more than than it... You
know, it it might not be in being
more than a very
unlikely coincidence, which is possible.
But with all that we've seen,
it's worth pointing this out.
A Derek tracked this down and found on
the actual link, and it he's gonna be
trying to follow up on who was involved
in this? And again, by the way, it
shows listeners just because I'm there right now,
not necessarily before because I wasn't there when
this was happening.
And he's gonna follow up with who actually
said this in the conversation, which you'll see
in a second and where they got it
from apparently in a club house conversation where
they're claiming on the ninth, you'll hear it.
It was being reported by 1 of them
that they were hearing from their information that
there was an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania, and
it turns out at a time when he
actually wasn't even in Pennsylvania. Which I find
very very important as well that
Derek sent this to me as well, but
apparently he was in Florida
on that day,
My point would be that if it was
gonna be a coincidence that you might... They
might just be thinking he's in Florida somebody
might try to kill him, but he wasn't
even excuse me in Pennsylvania, but he wasn't
even in Pennsylvania yet.
So it wouldn't have been that likely that
they would assume that might have happened and
why would it be Pennsylvania. Very interesting. So
let me play my discussion with with Derek?
We recorded earlier today maybe a few hours
ago, and I we'll jump back in right
when this is done.
And joining me now is Derek Bros to
discuss a very interesting part in addition to
the story that the conversation of the attempted
assassination on Donald Trump. And it's something that
had been circulating a social media, Derek was
able to track down the actual spaces where
this was recorded on July July ninth.
Discussing specifically, an ass attempt assassination attempt on
Donald Trump in Pennsylvania, and... You might remember
it was right about the time when Comcast
was down and there's all the conversation around
that, and it was discussed within this conversation
as if that might have been some sort
of a a link to the the point,
at least happened at the same time, So
Derek actually found the spaces which will play,
and we wanna gus what this might mean.
So thanks for coming on again Derek. How
are you?
Oh, man. It's been a wild week.
It really is. It really. This stories take
our crazy 3 days. It's been a while
3 days. Yeah. Yeah. It really just did
blends together. Doesn't it. Just takes over everything.
So so you you able to track down
the spaces with play in just in a
second. And it it really is
anomalous. Like this when I first saw this
probably like a lot of... I'm like, okay.
It can easily be
lied about, you know, and I even saw
which I won't even bring into it a
tweet or rather an image, a screen grab
of, like, a Dm where it was saying
something similar which could easily be faked. But
when this came into the conversation, I just
don't know how this could rather possibly be
manipulated unless it was changed and almost involved.
So give us the backstory on this before
we plant.
Yeah. So there's a clip going viral of...
A gentleman speaking. I don't know. This this
is... Like, I really don't know any of
the people involved in this space. I'll just
say, but the clip is going around Twitter,
and,
It's a guy talking to the camera and
basically just explaining, hey, there was a space
a few days ago. I was part of
it, and somebody mentioned that there was an
assassination attempt. And then he holds the phone
up and then, you know, records it from
the phone. I'm always skeptical of stuff like
this. You see these things very commonly on
Twitter and I mean, Instagram and Twitter 2
and Tiktok videos or screen grabs, like you
said, Ryan. I always... You know, for me,
I'm like, I'm not gonna trust... That. So
if there's any details, like, a name, and
date time, I'm gonna try to track it
down, And that's what I did. I spent
all the yesterday trying to find the actual
people that and eventually track down the spaces,
and you know, we'll hear what they say
in just a moment, but I would say
my next step in pursuing this, which I
think it's weird enough to pursue. It's... Like
you said it's anomalous. Like it doesn't make
sense at the moment, would be to track
down the person who actually says this, who's
on the space to because they make reference
to hearing it off the club house app.
So then if they heard it, maybe they
can tell, you know, hey, do you remember
what conversation you were part of who is
hosting that? And then you could try to
track it down further and get to the
bottom of who heard what, and that, I
think is really the the most responsible next
step instead of just kind of... Only in
terms of the investigation, like, think about this.
If if we don't go deeper into this
particular element in this angle,
looking back in 05:10 years as people are
investigating this event as they obviously they're going
to be for years to come. People are
gonna wonder, oh, yeah. You remember that random
Twitter spaces where somebody said this random thing.
And if nobody follows it up, then we're
not gonna get any more details. So to
me, not only is it the responsible journalist
thing to do, But just in general, I...
This is why I didn't share it yet
because I didn't... You know, I I want
to track down the actual space before I,
you know, somebody was already pointed out. Oh,
it looks like it could be mixed... Manipulated.
It doesn't look like anybody's microphones are open,
this and that. So I was already skeptical,
but it is a legit Twitter space. It
was broadcast on the evening of July ninth,
and, yeah. We'll pretty. I guess check it
out. Oh, I was just bringing on screen
the actual live page. Well, I I, you
know, there we go. I there's a couple
of downloadable things for spaces, neither of us
we're able to kind of make it work
unless we wanna subscribe. So this just is
just showing you guys on screen, the actual
pages. Itself, which is right here. This is
the actual
Twitter space you can clearly see
July ninth. Right? And so what's interesting before
I play it is just the idea that
You know, so that this is as far
as we could tell this is a real
space. So if this was fake, that would
that would be Twitter would be involved with
altering that that date, which I don't... It
seem that no reason to think that at
this point. And you can see, you know,
some peep people and hear the people recognize
Alpha, you know, there's a couple other that
stood out and like, the people that were
involved and so on. This just shows us
this here now because we're currently listening. That's
not regard before. Now what's interesting is
just that this is about an assassination attempt
on Trump, of in Pennsylvania being discussed on
the ninth. So it's certainly a possibility that
there's just a coincidental fact that that happened,
but it'd be very, very slim so I'll
leave it right that, let's listen to the
actual spaces, then we'll talk about it a
little bit more afterward.
Everything is so into intertwined.
And for me, the Catholic church. Oh, and
I will say, so this is their... The
conversations you see the title of it was
secrets and and in skeletons of the Vatican.
This is certainly the tail end of a
point you was making, then it gets into
the first part where it's mentioning this, and
then it cuts into the part. They mentioned
again, like, I think, like, 20, 30 minutes
later. Which is a very huge component
of how this pyramid works and also how
the Anu gods set up their different religions
on the earth. And how the Catholic church
was a part of that system. So the
Catholic church is called Catholic.
That translated
means the universal
So you have to ask yourself, why does
Catholic mean universal? Why is it called the
universal church? Right?
Why not just earth? Why universe,
Why out there?
So there's a connection there. So I think
that everything that we're speaking about is so
relevant.
And it's going to tie us into the
conversation today. So May you you up in
your mic. I saw you.
My did.
I just need to see if this is
true. I heard that there was an
assassination temp attempt
on... Trump tonight and that Comcast is down.
Is there anyone that's heard any of this
or about... Can validate any of this? And
where the hell the alphago? Because he probably
alright. I don't know. I just wanted to
announce that. I announced it before I,
validated.
So don't run down the street with it.
Due your due diligence. I will be doing
the same.
Sorry, Mb. I just want to bring that
Oh, no. We need that. I mean, if
it's breaking news, we need to hear about
it. So Yeah. And now that you said
that I'm sure we have some listeners that
are gonna be click investigators.
We need trump to get on that. Come
girl will get on that for us.
Okay. Great. So we'll get through the hands
guys in this video that I have is
going to help us connect so many dots
and see so many skeletons
in the closet of this
entity that has this image of this Jesus?
Egypt then.
So now, I'm jumping it up to the
next point, and that's all the recording. So,
again, May's I gonna say with somebody else
that both people probably
this large account, And I would add to
the the idea that they're all muted. That's
pretty much how these spaces go. It's kind
of the decor. You're supposed to keep it
muted until it comes wrong. So... But for
the best of my...
The way... You know, knowledge and what I
understand this seems to be a legitimate space.
Right? So just any other comments before we
move that's 1, Derek about anything else?
No. I mean, it it's it's real for
sure. Yeah. I think so.
There's a lot of research,
with Trump and stuff. Far they haven't found
anything. Have you found an an update or
no?
I just ate a potato. Give me 1
second.
Oh, my goodness, is she gonna make me
get my to chips out. I'm gonna want
my potato to check now. Listen.
For real amenities pringles. Every time I walk
buy in the kitchen. I'm like I'm gonna
get 1. I'm just gonna get 1.
Is what they said.
Oh, lou.
Oh, luke. Come on.
Okay.
Listen.
I'll sit there
got those sorry.
So what... So I reached out to her
and master where she heard it, and she
said that somebody
yeah. I I guess, in
where she's she's in Club house right now.
And she's said there's somebody that's in there
in Pennsylvania,
where apparently, he's at,
is reporting from there,
and they said that the Comcast was down,
and I guess it's down across the East
Coast. I don't know. I'm looking into that
too, but I haven't seen anything. I don't
know.
On on alpha we come to get you.
But, yeah. So it's it's...
But apparently, there was an attempt and
I don't know. I... I'm assuming that it
eventually will make the news, but it just
happened. I I don't I don't know. 01:00
in the morning what the hell would he
be doing out, though.
So I guess random...
Sorry. Can I ask the question really quick?
Have you guys heard about,
doctor? And John Trump, you know Pretty much
trails off right there. Right? Yeah. And the...
Yeah. And it just kinda gets into, like,
an overlap of something about Nikola Test I
think. But the point the point there is
pretty clear
I mean, and I just... I mean, I
I can't think of something that makes this
other than a
freak a coincidence, which, you know, I don't
think... I don't I don't believe Coincidence quite
frankly, but I think that that's certainly a
possibility. You know what I mean? But, like,
the stuff
mathematical possibility that Pennsylvania that's... It's everything about
it? So what are your thoughts on the
s? Account? What do you how do you
place all this?
So again,
if if I'm going to... If I was
somebody who wanted to follow this down, which
I do, then you know, the next step
is to look at who is speaking at
the time, go contact them. That's what I'm
gonna be working on today, basically.
You The other thing is there's, you know,
looking for details that were. Right? They mentioned
Comcast being down. I have seen... I'd have
to track it down from somewhere I was
looking on Twitter yesterday.
Somebody comment to 1 of these threads saying,
oh, this is true. I'm in the area
and Comcast was down the whole,
whatever day that was Monday or Tuesday or
whatever.
Now that's just Twitter. Right? So that isn't.
They prove anything, but that would be 1
thing to go look
Comcast is a company that probably puts out
reports and, messages to their customers if they
have outages in particular areas. So we could
look up and see If there was a,
outage. I think this is Western Pennsylvania where
this is taken place.
So that's 1 thing you can confirm that.
Now that starts to give this... Story a
little more credibility. We can confirm there was
a power outage in comcast, You know, tracking
down the person who said this and say,
yeah. I did hear this from Club house.
Maybe they can name a name, They can
name whatever. I, know, Don't... I'm not on
club house, but,
whoever
passed along the info, we might be able
to get to more details. So that's me
is, like, that's what I'm gonna focus on.
Now in terms of just pure speculation right
now, I think that
if this was a planned event, then it's
possible that it... The word leaked early,
whether purposefully, from some insider, trying to blow
the whistle,
or someone jumped the gun and maybe they
were planning on trying this a couple of
days ago before this on the ninth? Where
was Trump speaking out on the ninth? I
know for a fact that Trump has been
in Pennsylvania for like, the last week before
the
the shooting in Butler. So he was already
going to different parts of Pennsylvania campaign, and
he... And
Another interesting thing just to kind of add
on to this is I was doing some
research about this of when exactly Trump's team
announced that they were gonna be coming to
Butler, Pennsylvania.
And they announced it, I found the press
release on their website, and then I found
some news reporting afterwards on July third. So
this shooting happened on July 13. That means
that if this dude
did do it or whoever did it, And
let's say it's just lone gunman and he's
out there training and planning for this. That
would have given him 11 days to... You
know, get together. Now, of course, he's reported
to have been
part of a gun club, not only in
high school, but I found this out even
since my article that's on you have
that just last night, we're getting more details
of his dad saying that they were a
part of a gun club together, and they
would go there often, and he would shoot
a lot. So the guys are obviously shot.
Before if we're believing that, you know, who
they're saying it is.
But I just think that's interesting. In terms
of, like, him planning,
specifically not just going and shooting the range.
Although I will say the report show that
the range is 400 yards. So the the
range to... The... The length to Trump, I
think was a hundred 50 to 250
to So if he can shoot at 400
yards, he could shoot at 02:50. Right? So
Right. If it is who they say it
is, they're providing evidence or they're claiming that,
you, it is father's claiming that he had
a shooting background,
and then it would be announced July third.
Let's say he heard the first day. He's
got 11 days to really start mapping out.
Okay. Well, and and they did announce with
the announcement where it was gonna be. Maybe
he starts casing out the thing. I think
these are the details that we really need
to look into as far as trying to
confirm or debunk the official story. Right? Because
sometimes
we can get into wild speculation based on
no facts at all. Like, in my article
at Tl lab, I I asked the questions
that I think are worth asking based on
the facts that we know. Now that it
doesn't mean the facts that we're being told
can't be fabricated or false or whatever.
But I think instead of just starting out
totally out of left field and speculate on
things that we can't prove at all. Starting
with the the things that are being reported,
And then looking to see can we debunk
those? Can we actually prove them? Are there
holes in those stories? And so I think
that's 1 thing to note. The guy. You
know, just in terms of Pennsylvania, and obviously,
this, the Trump was in Pennsylvania already,
prior to this this shooting on Saturday,
So it's possible. Again, I think that we
could look up to Trump's campaign website and
see where he was on the ninth. That
would be interesting to know where in Pennsylvania
he was at when this... Twitter space was
claiming that the assassination attempt had already happened.
And again, maybe that means somebody knew ahead
of time, and they jumped the gun just
like with the Bbc reporting building 7 fallen
town behind them. You know, things like that.
It could be somebody
pass the word on too early, and then
oops. Sorry. Apes. Let me just building be
quiet now and of course, it's Twitter and
it's Club house and nobody pays attention. And
then, of, 4 days later it happens, and
now we're we're all asking questions.
Or maybe for the very purpose of making
confusing, which is, you know, either way, there...
This is kind of a hallmark of past
events like you mentioned with with Bbc and
these tight where we've seen these kind of
late
rather intentionally subtly put out points. But, I
mean, all that aside, this all complete, you
know, speculation...
For me they're 2 separate points. You know,
1 is about whether if this is a
real thing, definitely which I agree with you
digging further, finding out who said it where
they heard it from. Know, club house kind
of being perceived just sort of like an
elitist elitist kind of, you know, grouping thing
where, you know, they may be more wealthy
and more insight or so on. But either
way, you For me, it doesn't even matter
what it's connected to. I mean it does
and that's in so far that you find
out what it leads to. But the main
point for me is that somebody said this.
Recorded pro on the ninth. Like, that's just...
That's kinda shocking in of itself wherever she
heard it from. That seems to suggest that
this was at least floating around the conversation
before it actually happened. And so again, to
me, that's that's a that's a relevant point
no matter what. But, I mean, I have
highlight the fact that it's you know, as
as slim as it may be, you know,
he's a president or former president and running
again, likely the selection I argue. And so
the idea that he might have an assassination
attempt to clearly of on the mine. He's
in Pennsylvania. So you could argue like that
might have just been floated in somebody else
may. There's a lot of, kind manipulative,
intentionally dishonest meat partisan media out there, so
it may it... You know, all that aside
though. That's just like, in my opinion, it
will be such a
interesting coincidence. So I... I think this is
relevant I'm off to see as you said,
why that's so important to follow it up
by network where they heard it from and
fall down those leads, you know, but to
your point, few probably will with the resources
to do that because, oh, Twitter spaces, you
know, which is kind of the design. So,
you know, I think that's fascinating. So any
other final points you wanna leave us on
this, and, you, be touch on your article
on the way out.
I mean, yeah. Like I said, I'm I'm
gonna just follow up with this. I encourage
everybody to share this about this is this
is weird. It's 1 of those things. I...
I've... I've been sharing this story lately,
Jim Mars, the researcher or the author who's
now the Deceased. He was a great researcher.
And I interviewed him years ago, and I
I would always pick his brain every time
I we've met, and I have asked him
about the... All these random things that would
happen. You know, the coincidence of 09:11, And
different things. And he would say, you know,
whenever things like that happen, in my file
cabinet, because he had an old school file
cabinet. He's, like, I have a file and
where things that I can't quite explain at
the moment, but they also don't add up.
I I file that away in there. And
for the moment, I think this goes in
the hump file. We don't know what it
means exactly. It's obviously weird. It's a heck
of a coincidence,
and I'll try to see what else I
can find and in report back, and maybe
it'll turn into an article see. And, yeah,
on on my article,
we must question the,
Trump assassination attempt. I just encourage everybody to
go look at that. I tried to we'll
stick with again, the facts that we know,
so what... What's been reported. That doesn't mean
I'm not skeptical of the whole official story
as you can tell by the end of
the article. But I first start by just
reporting the facts. What we know, place, date,
time,
you know, what what we saw, what the
video shows, and then who they claim the
shooter is, and then how we have multiple
people saying that they warned the police, the
local police and the secret service and videos
of the guy, literally, like, there's new videos
coming out of showing people where video taping
while he was climbing up on the roof.
So people saw
very early on. And even after I published
my article at coming out that the timeline
was that the cops had been told at
least 26 minutes before the shooting about this.
So pointing that out, and then also pointing
out that there at least 2 people that
I found, and this is another thing I'm
trying to dig up further information on
is the idea that there were multiple shooters.
Now I've only heard it from these 2
different reports, the so it's kind of like,
again, it's at the moment. I don't think
it's something we can really hang our hat
on. But I think it's it's something that
needs to be dug further into. And then...
So Yeah. Just looking more at the story.
And then I sort of end with asking
the question of well who really benefits from
this situation and what comes next and my
belief is I've been writing for Tl lab
for the last few years
is that this is all designed to create
more order... Or excuse me more chaos before
the order comes along. And in my mind
as well, whether fake stage planned, whether Trump
knew or not,
it is... And and whether they intended to
kill him or not, or to, you know,
barely survive,
it is d Trump ascension... I mean, we're
seeing... I'm sure you're seeing it on your
timelines out there, guys. Like, people are treating
him like he is literally
protected by the hand of god.
And there's just a lot of things that
don't add up for me. I don't know
if I could say the whole thing was
stay, like, fake because I think there's things
that you'd have, like, you know,
If it's faked,
if it's fake, then the dead guys is
not real, the... That New York Times photo
is not real, which we know. Video image
fake. That's not... That's a thing. It's not
impossible.
You know, Trump's blood on the ear that
could have been staged as well. So I...
I'm not saying that that's what I think
happened, but I... I'm willing to entertain those
things and ask those questions and I think
we need to ask these questions right now.
I know a lot of people think it's
disrespectful to be questioning. And again, I think
we we we don't need to go so
wild into speculation. But based on what we
know based on the history of false lag
events, and staged events and knowing what these
people are capable of,
I don't think anything's off the table.
Exactly. That's just journalist integrity in my opinion
to consider all possibilities. Is that anything else?
Is is... Just the last thing, I wanna
mention, I also wrote another article that sort
of picks up on my,
my article for the Last American Va von
about the Trump...
Assassination attempt and it's called what is the
great inversion, and it goes deeper into
this this idea that I believe we're we're
witnessing, like, a fake you know David Dyke
calling into the mainstream alternative media. I talk
about Elon, I talk about Tucker and talk
about Trump. I believe that this is a
false awakening.
These false heroes being put in front of
us. And I dive deeper into the kind
of more esoteric spiritual meaning of of the
grade inversion, and that's at the conscious resistance
dot com if people wanna check that out.
Outstanding. Alright, Derek. Thank you for your time
today.
Thank you.
So
very interesting. Right? I mean, I again, the
I think very clearly flushed out there. I
think that that's feels relevant.
Regardless of whether it's coincidence. Where did that
come from? Right? Where... Who said that first.
And so Derek gonna follow up on that
in general.
But there's a lot of reason people have
right now to feel it too at least
logically question whether there was more to the
story. And that adds another layer to it.
You know, And what Derek said I fully
agree with. It's kind what I was saying
in the beginning. I'm not fully settled on
anything but I feel like, you know, there...
It's... There's a big difference between something that
is fake entirely, like it never even happened
and something that is.
And that's usually where people kind lose themselves
in it. Where you can call this a,
you know, something other than just what it
looks like, but that doesn't have to mean
that people didn't actually get shot. Right? Just
because people were shot doesn't end up meaning
that it's exactly what it looks like. It's
or that's where the average person kinda of
loses themselves. You know, what are you saying?
And it we saw people that were killed
and and and you're right. That... But
The governments we're talking about we'll kill people
with a batting an eye. It's happening as
we're speaking right now. Again, that's all to
say that we should continue to ask questions.
Right? And I I think that it's important
to do so. Now back to this point,
I wanted to highlight this,
as we were speaking,
let's talk
Z ranch.
Rick kinda just tagged them in this, and
she reached... Immediately got back. Say, hey, this
is our information and here... There 2 of
them we're speaking in this were
Maze love and
NNMMV747
and a bunch of other people as well.
So they're tagging this. I've included this link.
She basically just reached out and like I
said, you know, the... Hopefully, they're gonna connect
with Derek. Because that's fantastic. Now she ta
he tagged her original tweet here.
Which again, you know, I... That... This is
as always objective. It's just a screenshot, so
we don't know, but this is her claiming
this is her back and forth and it
simply says,
heard there was an assassination attempt in Trump
Pennsylvania tonight, Comcast down everywhere. That's where she
was basically relaying to the spaces. And he
she said, where did you hear that? And
this this is what she was saying on
there. I... On Club house through a trusted
source. So that's what we're getting at. That's
what we wanna find out, hopefully, she'll be
able to...
Open this up further. And as she said,
they said they got intel from people in
Pennsylvania, not sure media is covering it Comcast
down and so on. Right? So again, like,
they're excited. It could very well be that
this was sort of a, you know, in
the in the context of it being an
actual attempt, but planned.
Whether that means an actual assassination attempt or
a planned kind of manipulated stage concept, still
actually shooting. However you look at that? The
point is that it might have just slipped
that early, which happens in the past or
that they plant that idea because they I've
seen that as well. Like Derek points at
with Bbc and covering building 7 falling and
reporting it happening before the building fell. Everyone
tries to miss that, but it's exactly what
it sounds like. It's very it's very important.
So That's important there and don't forget as
Derek looked up on the ninth at least
as they report, he was in Florida.
Very interesting.
Now let's get into more of this Oh,
and the walmart point, by the way. We
talked about this in the last show. Just
to add to that same point. Don't forget
this guy named brandon Big in March.
Gave a prediction, and I believe I have
that right here about
this exact scenario. Bringing back America because the
lord told me he said, I am not
done with America.
He said there's going to be a new
wave of patriotism coming out, and that's whenever
I saw, Trump, and I saw the I
saw a a red wave coming out of,
Michigan. And then I saw Oklahoma and there
was em of people, and they were all
on,
these these... They had torches all throughout Oklahoma
and they were raising up these torches that
looked like fire, and they were bringing forth
a new patriotism upon the nation and it
was coming, It was being birthed and a
it just kept spreading like fire all throughout
America all throughout and I saw Trump rising
up, and then I saw an attempt on
his life.
That the... This bullet flew by his ear,
and it came so close to his head
that it busted his drum... Eardrum. And I
saw...
He was... He fell to his knees during
this time frame.
Now it goes on from there, but so
it's interesting.
Is it flew by your ear, I don't
believe that would ultimately be,
unless say shot by your ear that it
would affect your eardrum. It's interesting, but that's
not necessarily what we're hearing now, but just
told just again, the coincidence of of saying
this in the the same side and the
ear and the shot. I mean, it's just
interesting. Certainly could just be a coincidence. But
you know, you know my opinion about that.
I... It's something that's possible, but, you know,
it's it's today, those get taken advantage of
in a lot of ways. Now in other
anomalous reports before we get into, kind of
the more of the breakdown of the angles
and the actual images of the injury and
in a lot of this just just doesn't
seem to add up to be still
is that there's been some,
ridiculous reports. And I don't mean necessarily like
false. Again, question it because we don't know
whether they're lying for some other the reason,
But this is coming from corporate media from
secret service, reports that are laughable.
For instance, Secret service identified rooftop security risk
before the rally, which I pointed at before
I think.
But the point of that is first of
all, if this is... And this is the
thing I thought, oh, wake up, actually where
we pointed this out. The the... This is
supposed to be outside the security zone. That's
what we were told right away. Right? That's
why.
But tell me how exactly you can identify
a, security risk beforehand, but then still keep
that outside the security zone. Again, 1 of
these points that right there
without all the other points around it suggest
that this was allowed to happen or made
to happen. In any case, that's ridiculous.
As we get into some of the ones
right next, it even get... It gets even
more ridiculous. So keep these own mind next
to each other Tandem because clearly, these things
show something ridiculous. Just, like, again, like, from
a perspective that it's
hard to believe that this would happen,
with what their job is in any context.
It's just it's unbelievable to me. So it's
a security risk.
Right? And that they they said this, they
recognize recognized that beforehand,
And then Cbs news reports, Snipers were stationed
inside the building, and this is 1 of
the things I'll show you in the daily
article next.
Because of that, apparently the roof was too
sla it, and I'll show you why that
also doesn't make any sense. But they were
stationed in the building.
So what they're telling us is as this
person
climbed a ladder, walked across a tin roof
with a gun laid down, and people were
screening right outside that building. Those are guns
of guys
at least minutes beforehand,
and they didn't know that. The people in
the building to know that it also... It
also shows you that there were people that
were lined up. If you think this was
where the shot came from, and then he's
the shooter.
Or inside the building with the same line
of sight, which consider that.
And it says 1 of the snipers inside
saw the attempted assassin outside
and looking up at the roof observe the
building and disappearing a local law enforcement and
said. So now we have what 3 different
examples of law enforcement seeing this person
acknowledging him as a risk or trying to
find him, but don't mind all the people
that have told us in all the videos
we've seen, 2 of which I'll show you
again, going. He's right there. He's on the
roof. There's the other guy that said he
saw them jumping from roof to root. Now
that's 1 report from the second witness we
showed recently or on the last show.
I don't know if that 1 is just
his opinion or, you know, always take with
a grain of salt witness reports. Always.
What... It's not even to say dishonest. It's
just ask any kind of a police investigator,
or the point is that it's it's... They
take it with a grain salt because people
could simply just remember wrong. And the further
they get away from it the more that
happens and so on.
But my point is,
he made it seem that this was like
a 20 minute window.
So now we have the location being identified
beforehand, but weirdly not including that in the
security zone, which I understand. No drones, nothing
else you talked about. They list all that
as well. They have Snipers inside that building
under this guy. Here's what Daily mail reported.
Secret service director. This is kimberly C, the
gives bizarre reason why an agent wasn't on
the roof.
Here's what it says.
C who is facing calls to resign over
the massive security failure said secret service officials
planning security, so this is beforehand,
for the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania considered the
warehouse 01:40... A hundred and 40 70 yards
away from where Trump spoke to be a
risky position for their agents.
Okay? So they define as security risk
which is very different in regard to anybody
being there, but then she's claiming that they
argued it was a risky position for their
people to be in.
That's actually what she said. Showing news, details
it says, have revealed
that a team of local police snipers were
inside the building, which we just told you,
While that happened,
Crooks managed
the alleged sniper managed to evade cops and
secret service, they say
3 times.
Even though he had been deemed
suspicious before that. So now we have people
seeing him, we have reports from people there.
We have the area and identified. We have
him being deemed suspicious beforehand, and then we've
got secret service, the best of the best,
losing him 3 times.
Guy is not trained any kind of special
ops as we're so we're told. He's a
random kid from school but apparently, I get
mixed reports apparently whether there's a bad shot
or not, we'll get it another a second.
Either way,
3 times, or people seem to be identifying
him all over the place. It says even
though he was deemed suspicious and could have
been on the roof for up to 30
minutes.
30 minute, they say. Witnesses also begged law
enforcement to act upon act when they saw
him clam onto the roof
with his Ai style rifle, which I'm sure
that me. But the lapse is in security
meant he was able to carry out his
bid to take president's life.
That building in particular it says. This is
C.
Has a slope roof
at its highest point.
And so, you know, there's a safety factor
that will be considered
fair that we wouldn't want to put somebody
on a slope roof.
She said that the Abc on an interview
today.
Quote, and so, you know, the decision was
made to secure the building from inside.
Now you tell me something.
Do you believe that securing the building from
the inside, but leaving open the top, which
was already identified as security risk would make
any sense?
And what exactly were they doing inside the
building? Do they have a clean line of
sight or they shoot from inside? What does
that even... How does this even make sense?
It says, quote, the shooter was actually identified.
This is her speaking again
as a potential person of suspicion.
C said, Quote, unfortunately, with the rapid succession
of how things unfolded, which I'm not even
sure what that means
by the time that individual was eventually located,
despite all the people, like, pull up on
the shirt tails of these police officers. He's
right there,
they were on the rooftop and were able
to fire off at the form president.
That's not a joke. Never we're gonna get
in into that's actually a different angle. Let
me grab that real quick.
While. I'll put these over with the other
angle shots we're gonna go through in a
second.
Okay. So that's what she reported.
Now Jared Chambers makes a really good observation.
Which is
this, which by the way, we're gonna show
in a second, there were 2 different sniper
locations, which seems to be missed by a
lot of people. This appears to be the
1 we showed you last time, 1... Some...
1 of them have these normal, like, baseball
hats. The other ones have these floppy hats.
It's very clear. You. I'll show you. And
then clearly, you can tell the difference on
the building they're on, and I'll show you
a moment.
Yeah look, this is not some manipulative shot.
That is the roof that they're are and
you've seen this roof. It's very clear. The
1 we've shown you many times. This is
the other shot. Also not altered. This is
exactly the shot, of where he was shooting
from. You wanna tell me which 1 was
more slope?
I mean, how ridiculous is that... This is
the kind of stuff that people dismiss
But why this is a monumental point for
me. It not only shows you that she's
clearly not being honest with you? What was
the actual reason who knows?
It just continues to add to the the
suspicion that we all currently feel. But most
of us anyway, it doesn't seem to add
up. So why would that be the answer?
It's just 1... It's it's a it's AAA
narrative on top of narratives that already don't
make sense. It's absolutely crazy to me.
And then I have to highlight what Sal
pointed out again on the fourteenth, which is...
He straight up called this. Before they had
said anything like this. He says saying say
the line Fbi, he was on our radar.
Well, there you go. And at... This is
this... This is beginning to have literally every
hallmark mark. I don't know why this wants
to not zoom in again There we go.
Of what we've seen in the past of
events that at the very least
suspicious.
If not altered events false flags, psychological operations,
whatever else you wanna to call it. Think
of crazy that is. Every time,
Now, the other ones which I just worth
piloting still are did they local officer. So
this is different by the way. Now here's
another angle of the of the shot of
this roof by the way, which I don't
believe is the... It makes that confusing the
angle it's hard to see. The point though
is a local officer.
So we have the secret service. We have
the other officers that... This is a different
specific local officer who apparently...
While they're all...
Confused and baffled and running around, I'm not
sure where these people are, but
deemed suspicious and evading him 3 times
a random local officer apparently climbed this ladder
and saw him,
and then he got the gun pointed at
him, and he walked back down the ladder,
and that's apparently when the shot happened.
I just think this seems hard to believe
to say it very kindly. I said this
last time.
And then we'll get into the timing of
the shots, which this will add more ink...
This will open up more. The idea that
the... As far as I'm concerned,
the last shot that we heard based on
what I can see And again, maybe something
will come up that shows this is inaccurate.
There's more to the story, but based on
the timing for multiple videos It seems like
the last shot. The the anomalous kind of
last 1 outside of all the ones that
were in kind of a series was the
1 that killed this guy. And I'll show
you why I think that. I did in
the last show, but you guys can decide
for yourselves.
Now here, oh, and this was just 1...
I wanna include this. This is completely... This
is...
Entirely un verified. But I just think it's
interesting to add to all the information flying
around and of course, we have the examples
of a lot of partisan media out there
that seem to be trying to muddy the
waters. You can pick... You can decide for
yourself where this lands. We get this kind
of reporting from a lot of these larger
accounts. If this is radio it's insane or
this 1 same thing. It would be crazy
if this was real so support as we
don't know. And usually,
that's an indication that's likely not. That's how
I feel usually. But
You could decide this is another 4 chan
post, which I've seen you... I've seen more
things on 4 that end up being completely
ina legitimate, and that I have that are.
But there are plenty of times where things
come out from this that seem to be
kind, you know, in a spooky way far
ahead of the story that This is simply
saying, Hi. My name is Jonathan Willis, and
he's claiming to be 1 of the the
the officer and the famous photo of the
2 snipers. But again, there's more than 2.
That makes me think that this guy doesn't
know that there was more than 2, and
so that makes me think that's not the
guy, my opinion, but it says
that he came... Tell people essentially that he
saw the ass in his sights
for at least 3 minutes, but he was
basically told to stand down.
So to if if it does try to
be true, that would without a lot to
the story. But as far as I could
tell it's completely un verified, so we'll have
to wait and see. Now,
let's get to the point about the angle.
As well as the timing.
So here are some really good breakdowns that
are much more specific. I like this 1
because you can see the... It's a real
shot and then gives you the angles, But
it's a little bit hard because it doesn't
give you the exact angle of where you
might be facing, but so for the podcast.
It's just simply showing, again, and this is
not the only 2 snipers. Me see if
I can just show you that real quick.
I'll jump ahead.
Here it is...
Sorry. Did me graphic shot there. Well, I'll
get to in a second. 1 of these
has it right here.
Where is that. Anyway, I'll get to it.
There this the show... It's it's an important
post that shows
Here it is.
There's there's 2 sets of snipers. See this
1 that for the podcast, 1 building has
the number 14 under it. With a different
kind of different lot wires in front of
it, and this 1 is the 1 that
I was showing you the day. This 1
is the 1 that's kind of where Trump
was spacing tube warm is right this 1
was more to the left, and I'll actually
show you right here. So you see
the first box there,
the closest 1. That's Trump on the stage.
Another bread box, that's where those first snipers
where showed you, the other ones were here.
Right? That right there, I believe... On the
or, maybe over on this 1. The point
is that they're on these buildings behind him.
I believe it's this 1 based on the
the look of the building. So the point
is that that's being seemingly kind of left
out of the story. And again, you can
see that 1 of them has...
Where was it again?
Floppy hats and 1 of them has.
The other kind. Now what I find really
odd and we'll come in a second is
why both of them at different times, not
just right when this happened seem to be
looking exactly in the same direction. Or at
least generally this way as opposed to any
anywhere in the 03:60 view around them. I
find that interesting or at the very least
the 180 view where the buildings aren't. But
so you can see here's Trump.
He's facing this way
forward,
and you've got this building over here, which
is where the guy was per. Now remember,
And then, look, remember that these people down
here
saw him up there. And I'll I'll get
to that in a second as well. Where...
I'll just quickly, I can probably... You remember
where the stuff is lined up. So here
they got this shot, which, again, remember hair
color. I don't think that adds up at
all but the shot they're showing us.
He's... You could see him facing that way,
and this is the building.
My point showing you that is that means
he was all the way to the far
I get... You know, it's confusing left and
right based on where you're standing, but if
you're facing Trump, he was all the way
to the right of that building. So that's
important I think. You can see that based
on the way he was laying,
others are kind of lining up all over
way the left, I think that changes the
angle. Now my point in saying all this,
is that you have the snipers who were
looking right at this guy.
That's very clear. At least in that that
direction of that building. And there's a video
I'll show you again, which shows you at
least 7 minutes with
and then their guns where they are looking
right there.
Then you have Trump looking fit forward who
turns to the right,
and the ideas that he got shot on
the right ear.
I still argue.
Based on these angles, I don't understand how
he got hit on the top sort of
back right of his ear while he was
looking to his right. I'll show you some
of the graphs they have. You guys can
decide for yourself, I'm not saying, certainly could
just be the way this happened. And that
the angle they're all saying, you know, God
saved him is a kind of the narrative
we're seeing. And I'll show you why that
doesn't really add up either because he was
looking that direction for a while. Before the
shot happened. He did barely turn back and
then turn back again. So tiny variation. But
this idea this narrative was presented that he
was sort of looking forward until the last
he turned his head It's not really what
actually happened. And I'll show you.
This one's another kind of image. Actually, I'll
leave these up.
We can look back at them in the
case that comes relevant again. Here's another 1
that shows you more of a bird's eye
view,
and this kinda has this rumor down here,
request a kill, but know, Deny buy this...
By them, But I don't know if that's
fair accurate. But you... So this 1 gives
you kind of a better shot.
You building,
same thing all the way to the right,
then you got the sniper here and you
got the ones right behind them? Now why
would they be looking in the same direction?
I don't think that's odd. And then this
is what that shows you as well that
it shows you where the 2 casualties were,
which backs up the idea of the shot.
But if Trump is sitting here more in
the middle and he looks to his right.
And I mean, you guys tell me. To
me, again, the idea was this guy was
more
I I personally thought this the the building
based on the first shot that I had
was more towards the bottom of the picture.
And that's if you could tell this is
a real shot of the actual Gps. So
that's the building. So my point is if
Trump looks to the right where he did.
In my opinion,
based on the way this lines up from
multiple angles, I still argue that his ear
was not it it it just... It wouldn't
have been the shot that we saw. That's
my opinion. And if if somebody gives me
some kind of specific, like bert, like, a
direct scope shot from there that I can
see that maybe that'll help me see it
better, But I personally still don't think that
adds up.
I it's as simple as that, and It
certainly could be wrong. But I get... I
I feel that the kind of emotional
resistance to this possibility was it seems odd
to me personally.
Oh, and this is we wanna just add
it from the daily mail article. This 1,
it it... So here, this is again, another
shot. But see, here's the problem, guys.
You see how they're putting the shooter all
the way over to the to the left
of that building. That's not where he was
as far as I could tell. They also
have him aiming the wrong direction, which I
think is interesting. So this is Trump
facing
forward. Right? You got the snipers again, looking
kinda basically both toward him at least this
1 shows the other sniper position.
But you see when you move the position
to the correct position, which was here
because if the point is if it was
over to the
they I get the left gets confusing if
bang or if you're facing Trump,
just further down on that building, The point
is, you could see people with this shot
that got the shot of him from there.
Right? So you can see that he was
far on this building and an towards trunk.
Now again, that could be just
the images could be flushed out in a
more bird's eye I view that make that
seem
fore fleshed out as far as I can
tell based on all the information we have,
that doesn't seem to line up for me.
If he was here, which I believe he
was,
then Trump looking this way would not have
given him a shot on his ear. And
even with this shot though, guys, think about
this. Even if he was directly in line
with him. He looked to the right, and
you're gonna tell me it's gonna clip the
back part of the upper back part of
his ear. So that saw on that note.
Let me show you these.
Look at where that is. The upper back.
And on this 1, I... Quite frankly, it
doesn't even really look like there's a a
problem with this year. I said the same
thing here. It's... It just looks like blood,
maybe there's a little bit of spot on
a ear right there,
And then, of course, when he went to
the R and C, it was patched up,
which you'd expect. I mean, you know... Whether
there's a...
It wouldn't we'll wait see what we can
see. Right? And we can talk about that.
I'm sure we could simply argue that they
took a piece out of here after the
fact, but we shouldn't assume. Right? That's the
point. That's true try to... We can hypo,
but let's try to engage to what we
can prove.
So my point is that if that's the
case from right there or right there,
I really want people to try to explain
for me why they think that would have
been hit.
It would have at least hit the first
part of his year and then the back
part of his year, if that's where the
shot was coming from. I just don't think
that seems very obvious.
Now here is the full original una edited
shot. Let's take a look at that, and
we'll go through that again.
Well, wanna Really see something that said, take
a look. I don't know, that's. So I
wanna show you. So he clearly is looking
to the right.
This kind of weird narrative where he was
looking forward until he just decide... To, like,
something guided to turn the right where exactly
saved him. I just don't think that's true.
Something that said, take a look at what
happened.
So right there, he barely turns back a
little bit more.
You see my point where he was forward
forward forward. He turns back a little bit
and then kind of tilt his head and
looks.
And that's right when it happens.
Literally, he did move right beforehand. So that
is part. My point is the way it
gets framed, you know, usually gets kind of
hyper.
So you hear a shot, and we're gonna
line this up with the shots from the
other snipers and the way they move.
Right there was 1.
Sounds different too.
Crazy
Right? Okay. So this is what also with
economics. Right? So at this point, they claim
and you you can't hear it different parties
versus they're down.
And there's a lot we'll get into. There's
a lot of reports
which could just be kind of, you know,
circulating the conversation, which tends to happen in
partisan
you know, circles where they... Somebody said this,
they saw that. It becomes, we all saw
a second shooter or it could be a
second shooter on the water tower becomes the
kind of common narrative. I'll play some different
clips from people that have been pulling that
out.
But at this point, the the the protocol
of it all. And then I'll write there.
I'll actually talk about the other point. I'll
is that it's not as far as I
understand it. And, again, there's people like Dan
Gin that are straight up going... And yeah,
I don't have a there... I... It's partisan
of us in as hell, and I don't
really trust a lot of that. But he
claims to be a...
I guess, it's pretty much known that he
comes from that background, and he's straight up
claiming that that's just not the reality. And
I I agree with that. I really do.
The reality being that a secret service protocol
is that you immediately
get this... You don't let him come back
up and wait and pump the fist and
mean, he should be covered as far as
understanding. It's some kind of ballistic covering and
run him to the car.
Just everything about this even with the b
team as we're told Joe Biden took the
other people. It just still does not add
up for me.
And and since I positive, the point is
that I... So I I called a couple
of offices today. I believe just just trying
to get someone answer this question.
I think was Baltimore and and I called
the Nashville Field office.
And interestingly enough, I was asking for like,
immediately liaison, and I I spoke to the
Sa the the the secret agent charge. Was
interesting. I I saw I was like, I'm
sorry about bother you. And and this is...
I didn't record things. I didn't wanna, you
know violate some law with secret service, but
I ultimately, just basically what he reported to
me, direct 2 quotes for my talking with
him, and I simply asked, what is the
protocol for shooting first.
In regard to whether there's an engagement, and
there's a risk or even a shot? You
know, how where are they allowed to fire?
Is the point? Because... Can they fire first
if there's a potential risk? He simply said,
we do not provide any context around protective
measures that was the first quote. And then
said when I asked and simply said well
was another place that I can find it
as something can direct me to. He said,
quote, no 1 is going to answer that
question.
Which I... You know, I mean, I get
it. I get the idea that that is
AAI
guess it might give you some kind of
insight into what they like, I don't know
when you want people to know that you're
gonna fire first, if you send something, wouldn't
that dis. So I don't know. Either way,
that was the response.
And like Dan Von gin, for example, would
our heaps flat out has already publicly argued
the opposite. And again, my mindset is you're
telling me.
And maybe it's the case. Maybe it's changed.
I mean, remember, there was a time where
they moved the, and it's still the case,
secret service from, I think, the treasury department
to Dhs, which still resides there. Dhs is
you know, known for some pretty weird stuff.
The point is,
if you're gonna pretend that they're not allowed
to fire before somebody fires,
that pretty much guarantees that if somebody gets
in this position that they're gonna kill the
president, and then they're gonna have to respond
to that.
Even if you see them with something, you're
not if a gun, you're not allowed to
fire first. That's what they're claiming. And the
quote coming for real paul the ben Shapiro
sharing was that, oh, again, what if it
ends up being a telescope. Well, what if
it ends up being a gun? I mean,
I just don't even understand it's how that
makes sense in any context. Now, Not saying
necessarily, like, agree with or want the secret
service to be able to fire at anybody
they worry about, but I'm saying that has
always been what we've understood to be the
reality.
I just... I think it's very strange that
we're getting that kind of statements now. Now
this continues. They stan he stands up. But
you don't know where there's... What else is
happening, No 1... There's no way they could
have cleared this by now other than the
1 person they claim they shot,
and they let him stand up. They they
let him... He says, wait. Wait. Wait, which
I think are strange.
And let him fist pump and and get
in multiple cameraman come up and get shots
with it. I just don't believe that. That
does not make sense.
Unless these people are... I mean, unless, I
fully don't understand the protocols of secret service,
which I've spoken to people that claim that
they understand that. Like, and, again, even Dan
Bam gin who claims he comes from that
background.
Says it's not the case.
If of it is
if I cabinets,
you wouldn't make for anything,
We look how sp is right there. His
space is wide open. His space is open
in fact, in the direction of 1 of
the largest openings in the area.
Was another anomaly about the blood in the
space. I'll show you in a minute, and
after we get down to another parts. It's
a video video for Michael Y yan I'm
gonna play. That does... Seem to be odd.
There's... Apparently there... And there's a shot directly
Cnn that shows a third line of blood
in his face, which
I don't... I mean, you can't just wipe
blood off and leave it clear with your
hand. We'll come back to that.
Calling video
people
That with this this comes from the W
App and so on. You know, clearly, that's
more of just the kind of slip of
physical targets attack. That you know, what whether
he does that and it the all sense
or not, you know, which just another point
to at your night.
When, you know, they just get of the
car and then he goes. That's that's the
end of video in general.
So here is what you're... You've been seeing
about this angle the shot in the angle.
Right?
So the the point is basically that when
he... It first was turned, they claimed that,
you know, 1 hit his head.
But because he turned more that way that
it would only hit the ear, But you're
telling me that this is gonna hit your
ear, the top back right of your ear,
but not the front ear, from a shot
straight on, which by the way was not
even where he actually was. Right? It was
not straight on.
Either no matter how you look at this,
the shot was not a direct line,
especially when they try to angle it further
back there and to make it the direct
line.
I still think that's very clear.
I really do.
But the other point about the angle, again,
you know, the idea that... So you're say
that that much of a tilt
from where that shot was coming from changed,
I don't I I don't... I mean, it's
it's certainly possible. And you watch the shot.
He does kinda of weirdly tilt it the
way. So maybe that's, it's actually here. This
a better 1 right here. This 1 shows
you the...
And this 1 is from chief T.
But I get, Again, you know, I can't
verify that, you know, just because it has
this video that's supposed to make it feel
like it's specifically, like mathematically. I don't know.
That's the case.
But my point is it shows this with...
So the cleaning worry is right now that's
the angle.
But look at the way the head turns,
I just don't know if that makes sense
to me that that's the same as that.
And then again, they'll look at the shot.
So here's what's interesting.
Even there, you're telling me that only hit
the back part right of his ear,
That would not make sense. It would have
hit the top part of his ear, but
then you look at the other ones they're
doing like this, and that doesn't seem to
be the same angle at all. None of
these seem to be aligned in exactly the
same way. All just seems to be shown
in a way that makes it seem like
that makes sense.
Interesting.
Now it gets it gets more.
So again, here's are the shots in case
you wanna look closer. This is the best
high definition 1 I found
that shows that possibly being the spot right
there. Which it does, it does look like
something is missing. But then from other angles
of the shot, it doesn't seem like it
it just it's but again, it could be
photography it could be lighting. You can design
cells.
And then there's the weird bandage on this
ear, which... But I don't know. Maybe just...
You know, it it's never the the assumption.
If you wanna say, well, that... Why would
end advantage for his year? It doesn't make
sense. I maybe he just...
Embarrassed. Maybe it doesn't he's... You know, full
Hub doesn't want us ear to look bad.
He think, you know, he thinks he's cosmetic.
That would make sense to me. But still,
I I my gut would tell me it
just kinda feels odd.
Now, this adds a hole in layer. Doesn't
it, back to this image we saw. So
you're telling me that this bullet that's supposed
to be coming down from a, you know,
elevated position
is straight lined up with them. Now, maybe
it's because when you actually look at some
kind of degrees that these aren't, even maybe
a staged was somehow higher that is These
are all things that we need to find
out. But from what we keep getting told,
the breakdown from even corporate media.
Again, I'm gonna be honest again about this.
I don't know how this is even real.
I... And my everything in tells me that
doesn't make sense. Whether or not some high
shutter speed was able to... I just I
don't know this feels wrong to me. I
and then remembered, so you know, this does
come from new New York Times is saying,
Michael Harrington sent a retired Fbi special agent,
is the 1 that said that the image
that was captured by New York times photographer
seems to show the bullet.
So they're basically owning this and saying, our
guy took it and the Fbi spat agent
says that that captured it. And they go
on to talk about the shutter speed and
why it happened, And that's the picture right
there, but I don't... Just doesn't make sense
to me. And then, of course, you're look
at the where the bullet is. This
It's not... Look whether you're angled down a
little bit, which they are or not, that
is not lined up with the top of
a ear.
I guess we'll just ignore that.
Or the idea that this is coming from
a
direct straight angle, which I think it would
be angled downward a little bit.
But you guys can consider it for yourselves.
Now here's a video from I am John
Colon, and this 1 gets into...
Well, I think it was... I don't if
it was shared originally which by the way.
Oh, now it works. Now I wanted to
say it. But the this was a video
from Tiktok from this conservative...
S returns.
I don't... I think this might be her
video. I feel like, I'm not sure, but
he was sharing it.
I me... Yeah. Yeah. Because look you can
see the
the things on the side there.
Case. We'll play his first, and this is...
He's saying it there's a video and where
you can see the first shot hitting the
back of this.
Now let me show you that again.
That would be
this bleach feature. Right?
So the shot does line up, but if
there's other angles to it,
See this.
Right See what I'm saying? So that... This
is the stage. Right? This is the part
we're talking about right there. That that corner.
So based on this alignment, when the guy's
technically over here, not right there, that doesn't
make sense in regard to the shot on
his ear, and I'll show you what I
mean.
Here
is the angle.
Like this said, take a look at what
happens?
So what he's showing you is that little
puff that comes out the back right there.
What happens?
Something
Take a look what happens
That's the first shot.
Right? And apparently, it hit the guy. Know
there's there's... I believe,
was it 3 people that got hit. I
forget now in 1 actually survive... The bottom
of wine is,
There's
what, 8 shots?
Possibly 9, I think.
And it way it depends on whether we
know who shot and sniper shot and his
return and who knows how many he shot,
but this is supposed to be the first
shot, which hit Trump's here were told.
So I still don't think unless that's a
mis
that that doesn't align,
but what he's highlighting here is that there's
more than 1 shoot. What happened?
Take what happened
He says there's the other
you know, honestly, he could just be reacting
to that that that does seem a little
bit immediate. Wanna really see something to said.
Take a look at what happened.
What you know
With the hate that. It was just the
first shot hit 2 bystanders.
And the railing
hate
Okay. So rick he's just highlighting that the
first shot hit 2 bystanders railing. There's more
to it in regards to the multiple shooter,
theory.
Here's the on.
Same video, I believe, oh, see. Right here.
Here we go. Great.
So I am going... Yeah. I remember now.
So this is her video. So she was
actually there,
which again? Gotta point out. I hate the
people take the people's content without showing, you
know, why wouldn't you credit her? I think
that's important.
I'm tried to explain it. In detail where
I was in front of Trump and what
happened to the left of Trump, which would
have been to the right of me.
First and foremost, let me show you how
how close I was to put it in
perspective.
So with Trump facing me,
I was...
His left, but I was pretty close up
there. Now let me show you the bleach
to the left of Trump, but to the
right of me. To Okay. So there's the
bleach to the left of Trump right there.
We've all seen that with, you know, whatever
that is a crane. So that kinda gives
you the right the the spot. And I'm
I'm appreciate that she's kinda breaking down where
she was.
Which was to the right of me.
The
una analyzing happened.
To the bleach chairs on the far right
side of t.
I'm over on the far right or far
left of trump.
It's called.
I don't even get with that, like, the
person's killed, I guess. I mean, that seems
like a weird thing to say is or
something to that. Some conservative thing. Let me
know. These are the same bleach watch the
top left.
These are the same exact bleach features. These
are to the left of Trump.
Right there.
They came those shots came from the back.
Now watch it in slow motion.
They came from the back. Those bullets came
from the back left... That's what she say.
Of Trump.
Now let me show you what happened after
those shots were fired.
Well, so it's interesting. Right? So you got
1 person saying it's... Coming from the back.
So she's arguing somebody shot. I would disagree.
I think the the way that p comes
out seems to suggest that it did come
from the left or the or from where
the shooter was, that we know about
but it's.
Right? So it's just funny how whatever the
perception of somebody else taking somebody else's... Which
I'm sure they saw what she was saying.
So I think it's funny that they just...
You know, this stepped proliferate and people just
take other people's work and it gets mis
misrepresented. You know, who else? You guys... I'm...
Well, you guys can decide for yourselves what
you think that show.
The people are screaming, like and pointing thing
where she's talking about.
That was on the left side of Trump,
where people are saying that shots were fired
from behind the bleach, and you can clearly
see them, like telling
secret service.
It's from over there. It came from over
there and you can see people looking from
behind the bleach.
That's pretty compelling. But, of course, it could
just be that they we don't, echo or,
you know, they the shot fired and they
thought they heard it from over there. But,
a lot of them seem to be suggesting
that, so it shouldn't be dismissed. This this
timeline of events that I just showed you
all came from the left of Trump on
my side. I don't know what happened on
corey side.
I don't. And I'm so sorry for what
happened to him that he is not the
man that I saw.
He's not.
Something happened... Believe that's the the person that
the first 1 that was highlighted it was
if I a firefighter or I forget.
First that died, we talked about on the
first show. And on the left side
of the event. And I'm tired of people
gas me. I'm tired of people telling me
that I was in a panic, and I
don't... I can't think clearly and I have
no idea what I remember. I do. I'm
a mother. I had to be super aware
of my surroundings first shot was farther away,
which would have been to the right
of Trump because I was on the far
left. The second shot sounded a whole lot
closer, and that's when I was like, oh
my gosh. People are shooting everywhere. I have
to get these kids on the ground.
Stop telling me that I don't know what
I'm talking about. Those 2 men were shot
from behind
the left side of the bleach.
To the left of trump.
To... Just so that's clear.
She's talk... Like, she's talking about the opposite
side. She's talking about over here.
So something behind this, which by the way,
there's also the conversation about the water tower.
Again, all of this is by stuff, and
they could be mistaken.
Right? But
she seems very convinced, which doesn't mean she's
not wrong. And other people that there Gina
showed you Were going there there there. So,
you know, there's it's compelling that there might
very well be a misunderstanding of what happened
or a lie or more wield older or
shooters. That seems to be a growing a
consideration.
I promise you that.
And you can hear people saying that the
shooters over there the shooters over there. Probably
not the only shooter. I am not saying
that there was not a guy on the
roof to the right of Trump because there
was.
But there was also another.
Be for real. Be so for real. You
guys cannot take snippet
of
news and
and think that that they're telling you the
whole truth. They haven't all this time why?
Like, they're not gonna start now. Right? I
love this. There was more than 1 shooter
there that day. I promise you. But that's
her opinion. But what I love is this
is ever a republican
identifying that other republicans are pushing back on
her and she's like, we
weren't we all just doing this to everything
30 seconds ago. Like, now, suddenly, you're trusting
the news clip that come from the people
that were lying to a 30... See what
Saying. This is what she's identifying and hopefully
she starts to realize it are the
dishonest people within the higher parts of their
movement that are desperate to keep you stuck
in the same 2 party illusion and maintain
the same old status quo. Right? So that...
That's what we always do... And I mean,
I don't know that for a fact with
exactly You're talking about. My point is that
that's what we're always seeing is that you
look at the larger parts of this conversation.
And you always have people that, like we
saw a lot of it with the G
from the Covid movement that came over to
the Israel conversation that were just completely Gun
Empire.
When Suddenly like, hold on, weren't you just
saying they were trying kill. Now you're all
for it. They weren't being honest. And so
my point is that she's recognizing that it's...
There's no consistency there. Suddenly, they're blind to
it because Pro trump.
That's not what an objective person would do.
Right? And that's important. We all need to
connect when we think where people being objective,
whether your powers or not.
Right? She sees it.
Now,
This
is what we'll get into the timing of
it all. We'll come back to the the
multiple shooter point.
So this is Moshe Schwartz highlighting this video,
which shows you the other snipers. Now this
1 just breaks down the the clear example
that there's different buildings and different sniper sets,
which is already shown on that other image
we showed you from the corporate media image.
Now here
is a shot, I think is interesting
of what these guys did when that shot
happened.
So remember on the first 1,
which actually, I'll just show you really quickly
first, you can see them react.
And the timing of it's interesting. Will come
back to that.
And, you know that's a little bit all
that charged a couple of months old, and
if you wanna really see something to said,
take a look at what happens.
It's me the timing is almost exact, you
could argue that they were responding.
As the narrative goes, they didn't fire apparently.
Until after. Like, that was them reacting to
the first shot from the other guy. But
I've already seen people that seem to know
what they're talking about, like, either military or
gun special. Or saying he fired right there,
which don't know what's up to you decide.
But it wouldn't make sense that we'll... We'll
come back to this point where they were
looking there the entire time and suddenly just
didn't do anything until they waited for a
shot the fire and then still waited which
might line up with that un report.
Right? But so this is the ones to...
If Trump's facing forward the ones to his
right. K? Now here's the other discussion,
And this 1 are these are the ones
that when Trump's facing forward? The ones that
are more behind him middle the left. Now
wash.
The shots are fired. I don't... They don't
even seem to fit
unless this is just hard to see on
this video. You know? That's a little bit
old that charge that charge a couple of
months old and if you wanna really see
something that said, take a look at what
happens.
Look at that. They don't even flinch guys,
their hands don't move.
I find that hard to believe
unless they were expecting it,
right? Or something else. And I'm not saying
that's what I can prove. But I find
that very strange.
The other guy Damn your jumped out of
his seat when that when... You know, so
this these guys are looking directly Adam. By
the way, both of them looking at the
same low direction. That's what I find strange
too. Both of them looking directly at this
area before the shots fired. And remember, with
all the other reports, that was a location
designated at security risk, they knew there were
people in the in the building underneath them
because they were worried that multiple times they're
trying chase this guy. That lost him 3
times. You have people screaming well before. That's
a guy. He's got a gun. Right there,
and they're looking at it him. The whole
time.
I just don't know why average people are
gonna go this feels very wrong.
Watch again.
I think this said, take a look at
what happened.
Billy?
That's good thanks to me. Very strange indeed.
Now yeah. Here and here for, again, the
close up shot are the 2 differences. Right?
Just make sure that's very clear. 2 set
the snipers.
Now here is the 1 I was just
talking about.
The basics videos put this out, and it
shows you about 7 minutes and 21 seconds
before these shots fired. You've got the first
set with the baseball caps, so to Trump's
right.
Looking with their bin vernacular,
not necessarily directly at this building, but, you
know, surveying and looking in that... In the
direction to Trump's right.
And then the the shots before where there
are pretty much looking right at this line.
It's 1 I left off.
So now like, it's fuzz, what you already
saw. That was why Just show where they
were aiming the other way. So the first
point though is to show you that they're
looking
with their bin vernacular.
Lowest
amount of illegal
immigration average chart that charge
will just show you the other 1 again
since this one's actually better.
And you know this Now. This comes closer
to the time frame. Right? So it's right
beforehand and they're lined up. The guy's even
looking through a stop.
A couple of months old, and if you
wanna really see something to said. Take a
look at what happened
But to me, it seems like it was
right at the same moment. But here's a
video that was put out by... I think
it was John Colon again.
No. That was what I was gonna tell
you that. Here's a...
No. Is this 1
wrap. Right here. So here's another video. This
1 will get into in a second as
well that shows his kind of angle lineup
ups, but, you know, it it was drawn
by him So, you know, you take it
take it people can make mistakes, but also
this 1, which will show you next. Now,
this is his slowed down version. But I
gotta be honest, To me, the shot,
Slow down or not seems to be different
the timing of it. Is see what I
mean?
I think this said, take a look at
what happened?
Right. There you see lookup. Right? That's the
same shot. We seem lookup, but then the
timing of when you hear the shot seems
a little bit later.
See something that said, take a look at
what happened.
Or rather, I guess earlier.
And just said, take a look at what
happened.
Right?
That's it right there. And just kind of
goes through.
And then down. But but come back to
this 1, it's it's quite different.
You a couple of months old, and if
you wanna really see something to said. Right
Take a look at what happens though. Like,
I'm it's very clear. Like, weather slow dead
or not, the shot, you don't hear the
shot fire until he's looked back down the
scope. Now that very well. To be objective,
could be some kind of a difference of
the the sound from with this filming. I
don't know. You know, it certainly could be
something else. But I find that strange.
Happened
So you guys can cite yourselves. Was that
altered who knows? End of the day,
it still does not add up across the
board.
And he also plays this 1 or shares
this 1, and he just simply says when
he shares this why didn't these guys take
the shot. So he doesn't think they did.
Maybe they some other hurt others who know
what they're talking about who've said that they
did. Right? I I've heard a few differences
both from people who know what they're talking
about. Right? The opinion.
So it's hard to tell. But here... And
I only say know what they're talking about
the sense that I think you do they
know about guns or their, you know, military
or police. Here is...
The... Other video we shared. And this has
to do with the angles also a woman
saying there was multiple shooters. Shooter shot to
the left. He killed a gentleman in the
water tower here.
He killed a gentleman in the water tower
here. What been saying is that 1 of
the secret service people shot and killed 1
of the people in the water tower.
Right? So that that back to the point
where they did shoot apparently. But again, this
is what they're seeing, they could be mistaken,
that's worth considering. What you know... Coming in
the water tower here.
He killed a gentleman in the water tower
here.
I hate the music being played around it.
This is not some promotional video.
Her So here it shows, again, my point
with this 1 is it has the shooter
all the way to the left right there.
My point is based on everything we have,
the shooter in this angle 1 here would
have been all the way to the right.
Right? So here here's why I think that.
So if you look at this,
on if you're looking at this angle to
the left of where he's claiming he is,
because that's where the lines are all should
lined up. And show... And you can see
it shows right there. That's a parking lot.
Right? Where on this side, you have the
people where you can see they're standing in
the grass,
and they can see him
facing the shoot... Facing bump,
and you can see him. I'll just come
back to you real quick to make the
point.
Right there.
So you could see. Right? He is
facing
the Trump stage right there.
But somehow you can see them from the
edge of the building.
So I just don't see how that would
possibly line up
with that angle.
Or where, you know, if he was all
the way to the right there or the
left, Excuse me, they wouldn't have been able
to see him on the edge of the
building. You see what I'm saying? So that...
That's in a small inconsistency that I think
changing the angles for some people. And if
it was all the way more to the
right in this case from this position, over
to the right of that building,
then this angle here
doesn't seem to make sense.
Right? Because that would mean that this angle
wouldn't line up with his ear. He'd be
further this way,
and it wouldn't be the angle that would
make sense. I think that's important.
And then it goes on. I think, a
little bit same just kind of flush out
the angle.
And then you can see Trump right the
the stage,
You got the... And then it only really
shows 1 sniper spot when we know you
know, there's 2. But then it shows the
water tower.
As a possible spot for the shooting. Now,
here's what's are interesting. If you do believe
there's a water tower shooter that would indeed.
Have a better angle on that possible spot
on his ear.
So think about it. But see because I
would even say that that would be the
likely position for that to happen. So that
way in my mind, add a little bit
more credence to the possibility that that might
be the shot if you believe that's actually
what happened, and there's a lot of data
in that too.
It just very interesting to me how much
pushback on that 1 point when it's more
and more to me seeming me more likely.
Now here is w c make
George,
highlighting that same video, but arguing it shows
a sec shooter. A different opinion on it.
That's the wrong 1.
So
We'll just watch it right here.
And that's seems to be the 1 ticket
colon because he's the longer repeated it like
that or at least someone took it from
somebody. That's just, you know, and honestly, you
know social media guys. I find a hard
frustrating when people don't give credit to people
that took the time, you know?
So could be like cole them the saying,
it's than likely that that was 1 shot
that went it. But I don't know if
that makes sense because that means it would
have had to go through all these other
people.
Right? Where she argues and a lot of
the crowd argue that it came from the
behind them, so it would be to Trump's
left,
whereas he's arguing it simply might have just
been 2 shooters. All of them seem like
it's Mean, I would argue it the 1
shot going through all of them is the
less likely version, but all 3 of those
could be possible.
I
and then it goes into the angles.
So again, having on the wrong side of
the building as far as I can tell,
I think that's important. Because of the, if
he was further to the building, like least
like these shots show, right? Like that,
like that,
then that wouldn't really make sense. Wouldn't?
Where was it right here?
And then it shows the
water tower potential,
Or I guess, no. That's interesting. So he
guys it coming from an completely different spot.
So what he's arguing is there might have
been another shooter not on the water tower
with the angle of these shots, But all
this is based on the assumption that that
is the shots coming from bill, maybe in...
And he's saying, so 1 shot for this
guy.
Hitting Trump, and then the other 1 from
this angle hitting that guy. But it's all
hypothesis. Will consider for yourself
Now Daily Si put this out. I'll just
include these for you to watch. This this
is these all people from multiple shots telling
you that there were or these 2 here
and then this the 3 of them total
telling you that they saw or they believe
they saw a second shooter. So just include
that for you. There there's multiple witness is
saying that they shot, they believe or that
they saw a second shooter.
Take it over the grand salt and says
local radio stations announced 2 shooters to Right?
We also had the local radio station early
report that the thing Trump was hit by
was glass from a tele prompt. I was
I'm unable to find the report, but that
was broadly reported from local media reports, even,
like, re... At the what bottom line being
that it was a shot to hit the
tele prompt.
But then the Ultimate tel
were shown to be intact. So even the
corporate will even corporate idiot is wrong all
the time. But the idea of being that
it's...
Okay. To question the narratives were being told.
Now here's the I'll I'll play this clip
for. This is important on the on the
timing of the shots.
My point in this 1 is to show
you again where he is on that building,
and you'll even see it from the way
this 1 starts. But then the timing of
when the shots happen.
So this guy's on the ground,
you can see the grass in front of
them. I'll play this full.
Tmz, I guess put this out,
and you hear him.
They're all... And this is before the shots
as we all know by now going. There's
a guy with a gun. We all see
and people are screaming and secret service in
that building apparently are still baffled. Everyone. In
the building mind you, in the building.
Apparently 3 looking for them, you know, it's
just none of this is even possible in
my mind. But
the point is
They all identify him. You hear all the
the the first series of shots whether it
was 7 and 8 or whatever it ends
up being,
And then he says after that, he's turning
towards us,
you hear that last pop and they go,
oh, 0, they got it.
So I don't know how you explain that.
And and and with all of the other
narratives around this, and that to me, it
it shows you that whoever shot last is
the 1 that shot this guy, then how
do we explain all the other shots.
And how does that explain
the narrative that were spun about how this
actually went down that those were all his
shots first, know, you watch for yourself, and
you'll see what I mean.
The shot on the top is just showing
you the prom where just laying or you
could see him. And and, again, remember hair
color because, you know, certainly lighting and so
on or something could change. That lot hair
is very different than the we're being shown.
Very dark.
Okay. To hear the chef
I can't tell you to hear more shots
earlier. There might be more than we are.
Care. Like, isn't not a shot that I
heard.
Room 2.
So this is actually interesting. I didn't think
about this before.
It does sound like we're hearing different shots
of different levels of volume.
It's hard to tell them, because this would
be assumption. But the point being is if
that's the case, that would at and it's
not clearly, there's not fire hitting this guy
right now. Not yet. He's right that you
could see him. They're all pointing. Yet. So
the point is,
that would at least suggest that there was
another shooter or somewhere else. Our guess maybe
it's the sniper shooting back and they missed
him, certainly possible.
The report part right there is that you
hear the shots. That's clear. Right? So then
he says he's turning towards.
Hope he's turning this way.
So right there, of course, he could be
wrong. Right? He... But how would he mistake
a guy turning towards them
who was actually just had his head shot?
Okay which is more we're told. Some people
even said he has saw a head explode,
which the image we've seen just shows blood,
but the shot head. So you wouldn't be
turning towards anybody. Right?
Hope he's turning this way he cash
You hear that? So that was the last
pop. More more distant. You could hear the
difference, and then they go, oh, he's down.
He's down. And after the multiple reports that
they saw that the shot. So they... They
all saw this happen.
So think about that. How does that line
up with everything else we're being told that
this last shot is the 1 that took
out?
And and then On top of that, the
fact that we saw all o s tape
place and it looks like that sniper fired
early,
but that's hard to tell.
I really do think that this is completely
inconsistent with, like, it's inconsistent with the corporate
media reporting. It's inconsistent with the Republican narratives
that are different than the company media porting.
It just... It none of this seems to
make sense.
Hope he's turning this way. He
Dude. That's exactly why we need Fucking Trump
here
Right.
But so
that I think that's important. I think that
really does change the overall dynamic,
and then here he is shot killed, laying
in the same spot.
Now here, sorry, graphic shot. K. This this
is what this is the guy we're being
told was the shooter, which in my honest
opinion,
The hair color looks the same as that,
But that image does not look like the
guy that we're talking about here.
Or was the... Oh, tell him I didn't...
I forgot the... Hold on a second.
Did I'd closed that on accident.
Hold on a sec. I'm sure it'll pop
up.
Okay. So...
Oh, come on. Everybody's using this shot from
when he was a kid. Why does that
even make sense?
Where is the angle everybody was giving us
that 1? Jeez. Why is that so difficult?
Alright. So everett... This is the 1 that
most everybody was was sharing?
This 1 right here. Now, yeah, you could
argue the sun. I frankly think the hair
code was quite different, and I also simply
do not think that looks like the guy
we're talking about.
Now it's hard to tell. He's shot.
Right? His Eyes closed. It makes... It does
make a difference.
But, I mean,
personally.
I just see inconsistencies with the way that
lines up. But I... That just could be
my perception on the blood eyes closed laying
sideways. It definitely change it.
That's just a personal opinion. And It would
surprise me if it ends up being the
same guy. But the point is that this
is the picture that was shared.
We'll get into this in a second. I
think that was my last point there, I
was do it now. And then here's the
interesting part.
This
is where the confusion came from, and is
that this shot, this individual side shot was
shared
along with this video, which apparently appears to
be what they were saying trolling video of
this guy coding, and I'll play that in
a second that he was... That he's the
Thomas Med Crooks and he you got the
wrong guy,
As far as I could tell, and the
information could come along tomorrow the changes that
this was in fact, the guy pretending to
be that, this shot,
was the was the guy they shared the
problem in my opinion, and I saw this
Report the first time we covered this. There
were corporate media reports that showed 2 of
them that showed this shot
alongside this shot.
And that got mount muddled together in the
conversation, and I think that's why this guy
came out and was like he got the
wrong guy that wasn't me,
So not even trolling, just highlighting that that
wasn't me in that picture, and then that
got running with the fact that this guy
wasn't the other guy. And then this guy
got pulled into the conversation? Is a guy
from an anti trump protest from before.
There's a lot of misinformation and it could.
It very well could've have just been people
rushing the, you know, to say the thing
it could've have been
intentional mud mud mud of the information. This
1 just says this guy,
the Fbi is claiming Thomas Matthew Crooks, but
is the shooter.
And they're even weirdly saying this. The user,
this this
you gazing at j gazing on Twitter
posted photos and trolling video pretending to be
the shooter, causing confusion. But here,
Is that account?
And those only 1 as far as I
can tell,
and I don't see anything of any kind?
Very well, I guess it could've have just
been made. I mean, know that says,
made in 20 20.
So that seems pretty strange to me. That's
supposedly a fact check on Twitter, but we
know how can, you know, consistent those are.
Let me play this video because this is
what's important. This came out 2 days ago.
It's just 1 of many platforms. It's called
republic world. It's got 6000000
subscribers. This video almost has 3000000 views.
Probably has more now.
Now, still 2 9000000.
And so here's the point. They show both
the clip of the guy trolling the side
shot. And, you know, as if that's the
shooter. And my point would be that may
very well just be bad research, but it
also is this... The... If not intentionally, the
fault of the media, even the corp... Excuse
me, corporate media that con inflated those 2
shots that did similarly look like a same
guy, but that wasn't the same person.
That's not being really highlighted,
obviously,
but here is the video they shared.
Not that 1.
0, this was the
just a shot showing you him lying there
on the roof
killed. And that that is the the shot...
That's just the angle port. Here's the video.
Said, take a look at what happened.
My name is Thomas Matthew Crooks.
I hate Republicans.
I hate Trump, and guess what?
You got the wrong guy.
See, right this is the point. They're showing
us as if it's the same person.
Again, you could blame that on there on,
you know, I mean, really, it's kind of
even hard to blame it on the lack
of due diligence because the corporate media was
sharing them as the same person at least
in a couple of examples. You know, but
they always cover this as the fuck of
breaking news. Well, that's just being not doing
enough due diligence. Right? But at the end
of the day, this is what caused all
that confusion. Now,
There's still a lot of conversation about Y
and the is other possibility, but the more
that it gets continued to flesh out at
the very least, the person that was on
that roof that got shot. Does appear to
be this guy, the the the 1 that
the Syrian girl highlighted, the shortage wearing is
from a shooting range, not this shot.
That's that's wherever that that got muddled. I
may if you stand back and look at
the bigger picture, it seems like it might
even been intentional, but that's just an opinion.
What's even what thing Is I don't think
we've gotten really anything other than some, like,
I'll show you a couple of clicks, but
if people speaking about it from a school,
most of what's being reported is sort of
like, what that guy was saying. Thing you
know, that I hate Republicans, and so that's
how it kinda got framed. Again, even from
corporate media, which doesn't seem to actually align
with what the other guy was saying, or,
you know, like the the reports of written
school and it's it's an interesting kind of
confusion of the conversation.
Same fbi did everything that happened in January
sixth. Right? All the lies about that, the
misinformation. But weirdly, the republicans are all about
the Fbi right now and in in in
it's it's just it's just the same old
point. It's not about the... I think the
larger conservative movement is very aware of what's
going on.
I would add that it's more in the
line of it being,
you know, still in tackling Trump, but there's
more going on around it than just what
they're... The mainstream narrative. But either way, that
even may navigate.
That's just did, it just shows them
yeah.
So. That's got 3000000 views. And so people
that will see that other image and imagenet
and it sticks with them as the actual
guy. Right?
And so what what they were showing here
was simply that this guy... And he... He's
got... What looks like gauge ages in his
ears, the 1 on the left.
And this 1... I mean, it to be
honest, that this guy does look more like
that guy and unless like the 1 that
they're showing us,
wherever that was this 1.
But either way, it's not this other guy
because there's a lot... The inconsistencies are too
many between these 2.
So this just got very confusing, and I
think it seems to be intentional.
So Ian Carroll highlights this and showing...
Still highlighting the...
First video, 1 of the videos this 1.
I'll show you that came out this book
about the other guy,
this 1,
And he says a
this guy has all the marks of a
classic patsy play. Mentally unstable, yelling impression or
loan or high school classmates say he has
an atrocious shot but got rejected from School
Gun club, but III get can contradicting reports
about that. I'll show you what the Bbc
article said about what the teachers were saying.
It doesn't... It's this is interesting. And maybe
Ian point is exactly right. This is about
creating the narrative to make it seem like
this was the guy. You know what Mean?
And that's... For you to decide. Says high
school classmates say he was atrocious shot. Evidence
that that the the that the way was
laid for him to get onto the roof
for lack of coverage. AAA secret service.
A million questions about secret service and confidence
to sound awful like a sabotage from the
inside. He says we don't know what happened
yet, but think back to Jfk,
which involves israel as far as I could
tell, they sold the story of a lone
gunman when the fact of the true story
was very likely in extremely complex orchestrated operation
with multiple shooters and multiple layers of obligation
after the fact, which seems like that's where
this is leaning,
there is no reason not to assume this
is a similar event. And again, realize that
this was about something much bigger than just
somebody who didn't want Jfk,
in the position because of in internal domestic
politics.
And it says the odds are so wildly
against this kid pulling this off all in
his own with no assistance or involvement, which
is easy to say. Doesn't make happen, but
it
shows you that we should not be blindly
leaning in 1 direction. He says, and if
there was any involvement that applies it was
likely a full on by someone.
So think about it. Based on the evidence
at this point, it is more likely that
this kid managed to do all this on
his own, is it lies or that any
of the shadow forces in the world we're
willing to plan an off and pick out
an easy patsy.
Regardless of what you conclude, we don't know
the answer yet, keep your open mind, don't
feel hatred division be kind to people. I
appreciate that. Now this adds to this saying
that this top video, which I have seen
myself as well. Is actually not
the guy that was shot.
And what I'll show you the video, and
the video that we're gonna show you was
associated with this guy
which is... And so I'm trying to show
you how confusing this All God and I
think intentionally. So here is the video.
I'm, sorry. Going too far.
That
ian shared.
And you see this probably circulating.
Now, that they may very well be,
I don't know, but that may be this
guy.
But that's not the same guy we're talking
about. Right? So maybe this was inserted for
a reason to kind of, you know, do
that at model money the field in general.
But so that is not the guide that
was shot,
who is apparently matt Thomas Matthew Crooks,
and he shows this as well saying, 1
local police officer climbed the roof and encountered
him which we already told you.
And then he plays this video who was
a guy who knew him empirical or at
least went to school with them.
I mean, he was sit alone at Lunch.
We I mean, he was just a out
cast and you know how kids are nowadays.
So funny
see someone like that and they gonna target
him because they think it's funny or whatever.
So to, the best way I can describe
it.
And it's honestly kinda sad. Like, I don't
wanna say this is what
provoked it. But
you never know.
Yeah. You said it was lower? Yeah.
I wanna...
So another kind of like he was bullied.
He lashed out kind of an errand.
Say he was a loner more because he
was just...
He was quiet, but like, he was just
bullied, like, he was bullied so much.
So much.
This how high school. Yeah.
What did they stu remember at all? They
said to them or called him? No.
She just made fun of, I guess, for
the way he dressed or his parents.
It's well. We all know how horrifying rough.
Schools can be on on out cast on
different types of people.
It's just sad. And if we just it
seems like when nobody, you know, in bottom
line is obviously, everybody at the bull bullying
has become a focal point. Obviously, that can
drive people to take action just like this.
But I would also add if this is
what it looks like. Which there seems to
be a lot of questions there, but if
it was,
obviously, we have to consider the radical
by the media, the corporate media, driving him
to think Trump's said white supremacist just nazi
that's gonna end the world. And then all
the bullying and insecurities and solve problems and
that that, you know, that would be a
logical
overview this. Of course, that's never gonna get
engaged with because it's... The people over here
telling the truth about it or least asking
questions that lead to the truth, that are
the ones radical the Internet, but is just
not even remotely true.
And he also highlights the ladder, which you've
already shown you. Right? And then the... There...
Here's what's interesting.
This is the ladder we did show you.
But the ladder
appears to me to be on the side
of the parking lot.
And that I don't believe is where he
was. Now, again, I... If this is the
case. I I will happily correct that. I'm
not even saying I know for sure. I'm
just simply saying based on all the things
we saw, and the images, like we keep
showing you of where they were...
I keep forgetting where it was
right there.
Right? I don't know how you get that
shot with him facing Trump if he was
on that side of the building.
Right? Because remember, that side of the building,
which... See, this is like the daily mail
showing you on the other side of the
building,
It it just... It doesn't make sense. It
doesn't line up for me with everything else
they've shown. So I think that's an inconsistency.
I just need that to be corrected if
somebody can find out the... Vin this is
my point about. They haven't given us anything.
There's no information about... No, sorry. Any information
about
the...
Gun and you know, everything. Like, we usually
get stuff so fast, and I think that's
1 where what... What's the exact location? I
think it's interesting. But again, the corporate reports
are generally saying that it was on the
right side, which is what I think makes
sense with the way that angle was showing
him laying and there was grass where they
were standing. I think that's pretty easy easy
to prove. So when you continue... And then,
I think the reason we're getting the shifting
of the location,
Is because that changes the way this lines
up with Trump's ears shop.
Right? If he was over here, it doesn't
really line up. Unless there's was a little
shooter, which maybe what maybe that's the case.
Very interesting.
Oh, and there was a guy down below
by the way, who was... I think it's
back when... Whole on of things right here.
Who was essentially trying to argue that the
shot the place he was shooting from was
called the Grass K, which as far as
I could tell was just simply a pin
that they made and shared the image. But
if you have any information about some actual
location being called the Grass k, that would
be interesting and it would add more to
the idea This was a kind of a
insider thing. I, you know, but either way,
I just think that was un confirmed, and
I think somebody just added that pin that
got shared.
Now,
this was about the guns and and the
inside in school. So Derek made a point
about this in the article about whether he
was a in in the shooting club where
was a good shot.
Casey wright as to this and says the
school told Nbc, which was quoted by Bbc
that Matthew Crooks
never... Rather Tom I think Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Right? Or is it Matthew Thomas? I keep
doing in that backward?
The shoot the to the lighted shooter
that he tried out for the rifle team.
The source also claimed that they said that
he quote, I never thought or incapable of
anything he he's seen in the past few
days.
And he flush it on more and simply
says the source claims
that he failed to make the rifle team.
Right? And they they're saying that they was,
like, because of safety issues, the school district
said there was no record of him even
trying out apparently. It's says I never thought
Capable of this.
Very strange and here's the actual article saying
that Jameson mayor myers is a former member
of the actual rifle team
said that he did not make the team,
which is being completely contradicted by other reports
by people in new image, it's very interesting,
This adds more to the suspicion about there
being like, a narrative laid out. There's a
lot of lies about
many other pat in our in our past.
Right? Which have later... Like especially own Jfk
that have laid later flushed out. The lies
about where they were or what they were
a part of. I just spoke to Corey
about this,
But I said, he did not even make
the junior varsity team. That they essentially say
he kind of got pushed out because he...
There was, like a safety issue with what
he was like That's how bad he was.
They said I never thought I'm capable of
this.
School district said there was no record of
even trying out or hearing on the roster.
That's what they were saying. Here's the article
if you gonna read the full thing.
Now Sally the just adds a kind of
a joke. To it, but a good point.
Again, I want you to think about the
hair color overlap. Seems very odd to me
when you're looking at this guy
to
I think that's pretty
very different.
But as South Ag simply says, which probably
have recently interviewed him had a great conversation.
How does someone get a picture of this,
but the so called security doesn't see it.
Very good question.
I think it's the obvious.
Now here's a video for Michael Y, a
posted by Michael Y, Call scientific Big Honey
6. It says did secret service actively participate
in the assassination.
If so attempt anyway participate to assassinate trump.
If so, he says imagine how incredibly incompetent
they must be to then miss in that
attempt.
He says, or, there is there another layer.
He says, hi... He sees other people having
different ideas. There was another conversation about acoustic
calculations. And where the shots might have come
from the inside, which then obviously leans into
whether the secret service shot from inside that
building. That's the theory. He says he hey
hate this video earlier
calls us out. So I'll I'll play it
for you right now. And then down here
is a, a, just another video about the
hypo hypothesis sizing about the water tower.
Into an error says that there's over 30
on screen witnesses that claim that they saw
something for the water tower. But I'll leave
that for you to look at the point
for me is more so about the idea
that I think that becomes sort of a
prolific thing when they're all talking around it
after the fact. They're like, I think I
saw the water tower and that becomes something
that people then say. To reporters and, you
know, it... It and you could see how
this could... If it isn't the case at
all, could easily kind of become something from
a partisan way, but I do think there
is some
people that seem convinced that they saw something
in the water tower. So they play with
Michael Jan said or the the post clip...
The clip on Michael Y posting here. Let's
say, 1 more thing before shutting down for
the night here in Japan,
about the shooting that
that just occurred the suicide attack,
Now we still... We don't know if the
if the suicide attacker actually fired. We don't
know that. It could have come from inside
the building or somewhere else.
You know, that as soon as I saw
that water tower, I wondered about that. When
I saw those buildings, I wondered about those
as well. But I mentioned a couple of
times a few times yesterday or the day
before that a shot easily could have come
from inside of that building.
Anybody who's been through much sniper training or
know, doing concealed sort of,
positions like that knows that would have been
pretty simple actually. And then you could take
the shot, see acoustic, you signatures would match
up and that sort of thing. And then
the, you know, the radio calls and all
the late the, you know,
allowing the guy to go up on the
roof and
you know, the ladder and all these different
things actually could easily be explained if the
support base was inside the building, I'm very
curious how the suicide attack got to the
attack? Did he come out of that building?
Was he already there or did he approach
as people said
before,
you you heard that, you know, there's the
idea that secret service or someone photograph
this shooter with a range finder, why I
would he need a range finder there. I
don't know. Maybe just sheer confidence, but but
in any case, I mean, because it's such
a short range. It's easy anyway. But...
So that's important because I keep hearing this
from a lot of people. I'm not very
familiar with him and this. Per... Individually, but
I know people that I I consider... I
held their opinions in I regard that argue
this is an... In... Like, even for somebody,
it's not that creative of a shooter that's
not that difficult to a shot. But, yet,
I hear them this argument that it's like,
it's so impossible to hit the shot. I
mean, I'm again, I I I'm I'm practiced.
And I wouldn't say that I'm a professional
shoot... But My point is that
I agree in the sense that this is
with a scope in a shot, which I
believe would or arguing they saw or with
a, you know, with a rifle of some
kind,
especially somebody that was on the team, which
is in up dispute people for different reasons,
but seems like the larger argument from most
sources are that he was a part of
it, and then apparently, he had, you know,
that's pretty good. That that... That's obviously contradictory
what just showed you, but corporate media is
inconsistent at best.
But the point being that
outside of that conversation, most people argue that
this wouldn't have been that difficult. I just
think it's odd that we get such an
inconsistency about such a basic thing.
That usually is a hallmark of something being
a skew.
The bottom line is
Where did that shooter come from? That's why
everybody needs to upload all their videos.
Upload all your videos onto x.
Upload them onto to Bright dot com. Bright
e dot com. I can't even write B
on an x because it x...
Hates b on for some reason.
But anyway, upload all your videos to multiple
platforms
because some people can make sense out of
things Like, I might upload something that doesn't
make any sense to me. It looks like
garbage. But then somebody else can go bingo.
That's what I was looking for. There's those
guys with that shoes. You know, with those
shoes I was looking for, something like that.
Right? And so just upload it, upload it
all, Share it around, mix it around, let
everybody's collective
mind work on this, and then we'll we'll
get we'll get a lot more out of
it. Gotta per for a while.
Upload it all. Where did the shooter come
from? Did he actually come in and approach
that building? Or did he just magically appear
and go up the ladder,
like, as if he came out of the
building. Right? I have no idea. And so...
But if that building was that
Ms s sort of the the sort of
the the support base to make that happen.
That would been easy. Mean, he's got the
rifle there. The ladders are there, or just
pull it out, Go up. Yep, alright, Jimmy
going up the ladder, you know, and
do your thing and and we'll see it
back down here. Right? And yeah. And then
he's said,
and and and but me meanwhile of the
secret serve... Or whoever was in there.
Took the shot.
Actually, whoever that sniper was, who took the
shot,
obviously was not great because the president would
be dead,
very dead, because for any competent shooter,
You don't have to be super delta dude.
I mean, just a halfway
here. He would definitely be dead.
Well, there you go. I think that's important
right there. And that is consistent with people
that I've spoken to that this would be
if if you're in any way a shooter
that this wouldn't be as difficult as a
lot of people are out to be. Doesn't
mean it to sure thing. Anybody can miss,
but that support.
Especially with those subsequent shots, because there was
time to get off
second and third aimed shots.
More than that actually. Right? I mean, like
realistically, well, he makes a good point aimed
shots. Right?
So then how do you explain that? How
to explain how many in where would did
all the other shots end up, and we
know people are shot in the crowd, but
that seems to be coming from different angles?
There's all sorts of anomalies to that? This
just doesn't seem to make sense.
But anyway, so it's quite mysterious. Of course,
the idea of the... Of the of the
blood packet. I will not discount that. I'm
gonna say it again. I've said numerous times
already.
The whole salute, the perfect salute and all
that,
and and Trump being into the wrestling and
1 of the main guys who comes up
to congratulating him in please wrestling guy. You
know, I mean, it's just, like... Trump is
known for k. He doesn't openly. He, you
know,
I don't know. We can't discount anything. A
good investigator will never discount anything
until it's just proven.
Or,
you know, or there's just no evidence to
support it whatsoever.
And so anyway, there we go. Good night.
Hundred percent agree. And what I find interesting
is I I understand that this is a
a supporter. Right? Republican supporter of Trump in
general. And the point is that there's a
to be skeptical here. I like the fact
that he's even going well, you know, will
consider that there might have been something else
going on in regard to the, like, blood
packet or whatever I've was talking about w
that's interesting to me. But coming from a
position of somebody who supports this like the
idea being, you know, okay. So on for
a second, Like flushing why would they think
that would be faked? Is it coming from
position that they think this was fate.
You know, like, I've seen some of them...
Let's put this way. Some of the floating
narratives have seen come for like a queue
angle? Have been about essentially doing this to
to draw out the manipulator. Right? Or or
use it to draw in support for Trump,
And that that's a republican opinion. In some
cases. I don't see it as the major
1.
It seems like most of the mainstream Republicans
are like, that don't even question the narrative,
which is fascinating to me.
But again, that there is a lot... This
seems very kinda divided even among the republican
inside of this. But here's a shot from
Cnn.
Or posted on Cnn from getty images.
Right? And you could very clearly see the
2 lines of blood that you saw on
the above his mouth below his mouth, and
then there's a third line right there.
Very clear and seemingly more thick than the
rest of them. Which I would add, might
explain why at least at first. There was
no blood on the white collar,
but I'm telling you guys, the ears,
shay... Ear cartilage bleeds a lot, and I
think there would have been a lot more
that would have come down personally.
But who knows? Like, I I added before
as a possibility to be objective. Maybe he's
on some kind of medication that makes it
not as blood not a said. I don't
know. There's anything that happen. But here's what
I find interesting.
Oh, first, I have tell somebody out this,
this image somebody made with a ketchup packet
in his hand. But here is the shot
of him later. 1 of the many.
Now, look, you see a little blood swipe
right there.
But you realize the timing between this shot
and the... There's no time that... People to
wipe anything, people didn't hand him anything. So
you just go from him being down here
underneath all, I guess, the secret service agents,
the That stands up. And, actually, we should
just play that in and I think I...
No, I did. Hold on. We add it
back again.
You wanna really see... Right? So you got...
You the the the shoot the shooting happened.
Group,
I no question.
Mobile early shots we just talked about. So
then
it comes up. So he's down his whole
time. Now this whole time is where you
getting that shot. You're getting that shot of
that blood on his face while they're over
him. Right?
And then when They stand him up, right
then it's when you... You only see 2
lines.
The whole time. And it's hard to see
with the the video, but you've got... There's
plenty of shots of this of every scene
of this. You got these shots with fist
in the air. Got the iconic line to
take.
We'll screen there for a second. Hold on.
So right there. Right? I mean, look, there's
no other blood in the middle right there.
I don't even see the blood will, but
it's kind of low
resolution.
It's it's a minor point, but I think
it's valid. I just don't... And again, as
always, there could be something
just so happens that 1 of the secret
service pulled out a hand chip and wiped
his face. I mean, knows, but it seems
anomalous with a lot of other things to
question. And to me,
I just find that very interesting. And then,
you know... There's no time. Just even there's
a better shot of it right there. That's
the 1 we're kinda looking at. Right?
That bigger shot.
Where was it right here?
Same thing.
So I don't know. I I just think
that's very strange.
Because realistically, the point is that you even
if you wipe blood as you know without
something wet or or, you know, even just
at least a nappy or something, that it
would leave something there, and it wouldn't be
only would be where as far as that
went. I mean, that went all the way
there, you would see us all the way
back, All you really see
is 1 side to the bottom. I don't
know. It's certainly possible It's something that was
wiped away. I just think that's an interesting
addition. And Michael y the rest of going
well, blood packet and the fake idea as
possible.
So another few other anomalies, I think are
interesting before we go on to,
get into the... And media side of this
and the overlap with israel and the conversation
of the 2 party illusion aspect and how
they're... You know, and even 1 point to
start there of the whole
you know, political violence was not acceptable. It's
just really embarrassing as they're all acting in
political violence.
This point,
Wall Street Silver highlight this and I wouldn't
add.
Don't forget. Wall Street Silver was 1 of
the accounts that shared the Mark Violence antifa
a member as the shooter and then deleted
it. Who turns out to be a guy
named V, who lives in Italy who has
nothing to do with any of this. Right?
As as A wake up, you, Steve humorous
call humor humor,
in a humorous way, called him, like, a
Chu Tim pool. It's kinda what it looks
like.
Just adding that. I'm just only saying that
because realized there's accounts out there that are
just rushing to put things out that ends
up being false. Just always consider that. And
he says a metal box of explosives, which
we have seen reported by Corporate media that
there was explosives down in a car, but,
you know, I don't know if we can
verify that.
He says, a metal box of explosives
explosives connected by wires to receiver were found
in his car. Which could be detonated by
remote control on his body.
He never searched he never searched how to
make explosives,
but he had exposed to a at a
remote d na. He had help and a
handler or he had up and handle. Only
questions is who. I don't know why we
would, you know, a lot of assumptions and
a lot of resourceful claims.
Maybe it accounts from an article, but they
didn't put the link down there, so it's
just screenshots and text on Twitter. The point
is what we can confirm at least being
reported
largely is that their were exposed to as
found. I still get to see anything about
that. I have to see any reports and
showing you what they found and what... What
I I find it very strange. A lot.
More often than not of the events that
do fact out to be very manipulated. I've
always seen these weird secondary reports of explosives.
09:11, we saw that. I mean, World Trade
Center, Boston. I'm, sorts of these events where
were like, wait, these secondary reports of other
explosives. I find that very odd. There's a
lot of similarities to this. But any case,
it does... If that is true, it does
seem to add to their anomalous aspect to
the situation. Now me shares this 1 saying
this story keeps getting more bizarre. Cnn
is now reporting that crooks apparently bought 50
rounds of ammo,
a 12 inch a 12 inch ladder for
Home depot,
then walked a mayo with all of that
to a rally with his father's Are, which
is what the reporting, which I Said at
the the last show
and a ladder in tow,
So a gun ammo, a ladder was all
very heavy. All put together. Now and nobody
noticed him and stopped him. I mean, it's
a very valid point. What are we pretending?
This is happening he didn't have a bad
with him, So he carried a ladder, which
we saw when the ladder went. A gun
and ammo and just breathed into this. There's
a video going around of them rushing after
the fact, apparently after the shots fired, and
not having a lock to a gate having
to run it over the car. Like, it's
the stupidest been in the world. I just
didn't think it was maybe it'll thrill me
more relevant.
But to me, it's just kind of a
reactive after the fact and they were just
didn't... Why did this hop the fence. It
seems like a stupidest thing in the world.
But the point is,
that there's all these things and fences and
people and just nobody saw this and stopped
it. Like... I, the point did a lot
of them did. They said there's a guy.
With a guy. He's on the roof and
nobody care to do think it seems. Very
strange. And here's the actual article, which appreciate
that amused. Thank you for sharing the link.
Trump shooter bought 50 rounds of ammo hours
before shooting.
Why are they using this young image of
him? Does that seem odd to you?
I think I think that's strange.
Now,
all that behind us
very clearly a lot to be concerned about
a lot to be skeptical about. And frankly,
I don't think this is coming from some
kind of, like,
looking for reasons to be concerned.
I think this is a surface level overview
and there's a lot that stands out as
inconsistent. And you tell me if I'm wrong,
I'm seeing a lot of people that I
wouldn't have expected going like there's something wrong
here. In fact, people that I wouldn't have
expected saying, I think this is staged.
That's just interesting to me. It doesn't sway
my opinion. III
try to focus only on what we can
prove, but I find that relevant in a
larger sense about people who would normally not
lean to any of this, feeling like they
are confident enough to say that there's something
off about this.
Now,
The 2 party illusion overlap of this has
to be discussed, as well as what's going
on with israel. But first, let's talk about
the political violence and the the amusing if
not disgusting effort by Matt Miller to act
like they're on the side of good and
this whole thing, and we have to call
out political violence while they're literally justifying political
violence as Sam who hussain he calls it
out for. He said new, shared this clip.
Made this clip, shared it. Great work.
Start with,
some comments on the assassination attempt.
Against former president Trump this weekend. 1 of
our responsibilities as America's diplomats is to promote
our core values around the world with democracy,
human rights, human dignity
and the ability to resolve our differences without
resort to violence.
I'm just I just think about actually saying
that.
As an American...
Like, I mean, for crying loud.
There I mean, there to pretend like you're
not conducting wars
as a reflective...
Mean, reflex
military violence. Based on... I mean, that's exactly
what we see. Something happens and they just
bought Like, this is what this government is.
And for them to come out and just
so blatantly always project this completely different thing.
Alright 1, It shows you that they know
they're wrong. It know the very at least
they know that we don't want that, they
know that they're pretending to be something they're
not because if we saw that, we would
reject. What they're doing and most of us
do now.
But it just... It's just this inherent level
of dishonest
and and criminality.
I... And and the the b, the display
of just like, pa calmly displaying the blatant
mis representation while you're committed committing genocide while
you're... In fact, acting in violence politically in
every context around the world. It's just kinda
crazy to me. You know? And, like, Jimmy
Do has been doing a good job over
the years of really pressing this reality that
know, this government is not the good guy
if you wanna frame it that way. He's
right. It is obvious. It's been that way
for a very long time, and I really
think Americans are starting to wreck... Nice this,
especially recognize recognized the larger point that that
does not mean you are bad. It does
not mean this country is bad. It means
that people leading us or rather ruling us
or not what they seem to be.
Very big difference there. Right? As as Americans,
I believe that there's enough at a basis
here for us to make this what we
believe it can be,
or should be or was? However you wanna
look at it. But my God, I just
have to pause and just go wow.
I
speech is crazy.
Our responsibilities
as America's diplomats is to promote our core
values around the world.
Democracy,
human rights, human dignity,
and the ability to resolve our differences without
resort to violence as by the way, 1
last point, all those good mad of the
ones that are acting like the genes genocide
happening in in Gaza is somehow acceptable by
the way. President Biden has made clear. There
is no place for violence in our democracy
period.
We condemn this attack and all political violence
strongly and unequivocally,
unless scientists are beating up people are protesting
for peace. That's okay. Just as we condemn
political violence in any country? Except when you're
commit... You know, influencing protest in Syria, or
Afghanistan or Bolivia or Venezuela, you know, to
cause violence for your purpose. You but that...
But that's different different. And just as we
have condemned previous acts of political violence in
the United States. By your adversary or rather
by your allies ignoring when they commit open
violence like it's happening now. This morning, Secretary
Blink convene the senior leadership team here at
the department to remind them. That 1 of
America's great strengths throughout our history
has been our ability to reclaim our humanity.
Our fundamental decency
after acts of tremendous violence and in humanity.
We abort political violence.
In all of its forms, we condemn political
violence in all its forms. And is absolutely
unacceptable. No... I mean again, think about saying
condemn all political about. You... It it doesn't
matter whether you think what Israel's is doing
is justified.
It is political violence. That is what it
is. There's no way around it. That's explicit.
So you don't condemn all political violence no
matter what period.
You know, just gotta laugh at how will
fully dishonest that is. The thoughts on the
ceasefire. Is there any update. The negotiations do
continue. We continue to talk to the mediator.
About as I said, what the remaining sticking
points are and some of the practical ideas
we have and that others have for how
to bridge
the those sticking points. I will tell you
what we heard directly from 2 senior advisors
to prime minister Netanyahu today. For the 40
fifth time as it goes nowhere. And that
is that Israel is still committed to reaching
a Cease ceasefire that Israel wants to reach
a cease ceasefire. Obviously, they wanna protect their
interest. We understand that. As part of the
negotiating process, but they do wanna reach a
ceasefire and are are committed to these to
these negotiations. You know? Or not at all,
Like, literally everybody, but liars are expressing. Right?
Now including israeli people on the ground, no.
That's not true. My god. I mean, they're
like, they're just... I mean, think about how
desperate this must be at this point. Now
every, I mean,
everybody, the corporate media at this point have
been... Saying that's not true. Human rights groups,
United Nations Israelis. And that's a growing example
from within Israel H, all highlighting that that's
not true. They just literally wrote a massive
article saying Netanyahu is sa, charging the cease
fires.
I just they thought what must be going
on his head right now. He must... He's
in he knows we know he's lying. Pausing
That's... I hope he's uncomfortable At a very.
I feel that the attack on Mo milwaukee
that killed close to a hundred palestinians injured
about 300 others and so on. Under the
pre pretext.
Of targeting messy. You don't feel that such
a such a crime really, you know, using
f 35.
To bomb 2 places. 1 of them,
you know, the against the respondents.
The, you know, the first responders and so
on. While, the other was going on. You
don't think this is an attempt by the...
The israeli government to just basically say, you
know, you can go,
you know, fly kite. So So is so.
Yeah, what Matt didn't let it finish saying
is when it comes to the negotiations. So
bombing civilians including first responders who he just
brushes right over by the way, is not
saying, hey, we don't care about the negotiations.
There's not even a narrative that there was
a hamas here, guys. This is just blatant
war crimes, like everything else we're talking about
Of course, this got completely overshadowed by the
Trump attempted assassination discussion and the fact that
this has happened what every day for the
last 9 plus months.
But they're they're looking into it. They've raised
the issue, so we can all come down.
Sa, if you were the representative of the
Palestinian people charged with negotiations for this ceasefire.
Is the idea that the loss of civilian
life would make you less committed to reaching
a cease ceasefire? I guess I don't understand
the logic of west talking Well, yeah, man.
So what you're after saying is that there...
So you're gonna go, hey, Let's have a
discussion about a ceasefire. And the person on
needs on the table then commits an act
violence and murders 90 people.
Yes, you're then gonna go, well, hold on.
Why would I enter into negotiations with someone
who clearly does not actually believe what the...
His his... Weird way to con torque that
is to make the argument that somehow murdering
those people should drive you to more so
wanna cease ceasefire.
That's the point that San Hussein is about
to make. On the pal... No. No I'm
just saying that if if the idea is
somehow that this strike and the loss of
civilian life would somehow
jeopardize
negotiations for a Cease ceasefire because the other
side wouldn't wanna reach a Cease ceasefire. I
don't think I understand the the claim. What
we seeing is a pattern. But there's israeli
government that every time we get close
the results. We get something like this, we
get a bombardment that, you know, in the
hope that it will cuddle, You know, and
leave it the
leave it, you know, they keep the onus
on on how So to speak. They are
committed to the proposal that they put forward
that the Not true at all. And so
Harris said that israeli
individual said that.
Other government said that, he rights group said
that the Un said that.
Everybody is saying that including people within the
dynamic in the actual Ceasefire conversations.
That's not true. They have constantly pulled back
after Hamas is accepted what they put forward,
and change the deal. In fact, the most
absurd part in case you guys are curious
is that they continue to say, we want
a Ceasefire except we wanna be able to
finish our war
because those things are completely the same thing.
Right? We wanna stop the war, but we
wanna finish the war. Okay? And Matt says
you're crazy for not thinking that doesn't line
up or that was confusing He said you're
crazy for thinking that doesn't line up. I
mean, it's just a bit absurd
disgusting Mac
G test joke. We're watching this play out.
While they clearly, it... This is him saying,
I want to help those people, but first,
I'm gonna murder them. At him going, how
dare you say they wanna murder them? They
just said that. If they say they wanna
finish this war, they don't want a ceasefire.
But we have to act like we're confused
or its antisemitism to point out the obvious.
President,
publicly described on May 30 first, they have
said that publicly. They have affirm that to
us privately, and they have committed to trying
to work to reach, a cease ceasefire and
bridge the remaining differences and that work is
ongoing. It was ongoing here inside our building
today. If I might follow up on that,
you didn't you just justify political violence? Go
ahead. You just justify you said ham hamas
shouldn't gone through
Ham hamas should negotiate. There cause there there
are people in this room there. You just
justify. There are people in this room who
come and raise their hand and ask questions
and I do I do I so often.
Please. Of course. He never.
I just wanna
on the your answer to side of At
the only time you room here Sam lately
because he does that. You wonder why he
does that. I, obviously, he's omit him from
the conversation. At this point I don't know
why they don't kick him out, probably because
that'll don't get more attention. The bottom line
is exactly what he just did.
I don't understand. So you're saying because you'll
die that they wouldn't want see ceasefire, and
then goes on to make argument and ins
the entire thing that that should... So he's
saying because more were killed, they should want
the cease ceasefire. That's justifying
violence to drive for political. It's exactly what
he's talking about. But because we don't need
that example, the highlight the Us government uses
political violence to achieve their ends, which by
the way, is called terrorism.
That's the definition of terrorism using vials to
achieve your political ends or ends in general.
That's the actual
definition of terrorism. Has been so con manipulated
with somehow a a certain ethnicity or certain
location or with an at certain type of
device. No. It is... Has very clear it
has been the same for a long time
despite the government's manipulation,
committing violent acts to achieve your ends in
in particular political.
So what does that mean? That means mean
they're terrorists.
I know that word it's got a lot
of different meanings today, but it's very obvious.
And anybody else doing the same would be
the same, including people from, you know,
Countries the middle East that carry out individual
access is I invest or governments that openly
commit violence for political lens. Those are both
terrorism.
It's a great video for Sensor news.
So here's Matt Walsh, and I wanna get
into some points around the 2 party illusion,
but I think are very important. And all...
It's kind of overlapping with that same kind
of discussion.
He says, and My friday is fascinating,
this is... It's really difficult for me to
see... Like, for instance, we just showed you
the the the the woman that was pointing
out that other people in her party are
seemingly resistant to the new fact when normally
they would call them out. We just saw
Jan saying the same point. We said, all
these overlaps showing you that people are going
why aren't, you know, some of the people
just don't wanna hear it right now.
So Matt Walsh makes a point about the
Rn c and says, you guys can't get
mad at me for saying it, but the
first day of the convention or you can't
get Mad at me. First day of the
convention was totally absurd and a very bad
omen of things to come. He see Trump
has never had more momentum or goodwill. And
the Rn decided to use that to push
a message of diversity and inc rather than
using it to advance anything was heavily a
conservative agenda.
It's like call as I see it, and
that's what I saw. It's not even about
what you think about what he said or
that's the right or wrong thing.
It's not anything about that. What it's about
is that Brett walsh is pointing out something
that seems to be inconvenient if it's true
for the republican reception.
A lot of the comments beat this what
you could find. This 1 is... But just
1 of the random ones I found says,
big fan, but SHITTING
ess on
anyone
or anything
over the next 2 weeks
is counterproductive.
So you're literally saying we should ignore things
that are bad for the yep. That what
you're saying. We shouldn't highlight these things because,
you know, we gotta win
or we gotta take advantage of what this
moment is. That's so Trying to show you
is that these in these people that are
in that position. Where whoever this person is.
He just he's... I see them in a
position where they're willing to overlook anything that
is inconvenient. For they currently wanna achieve. And
usually, they have the mindset that that's because
the republicans Republicans are the good guys, and
that means we're lie for them because we
get the in win either way, and it's
good for everybody for It's called lying for
your truth. Right?
I think that's everywhere. In left right, the
2 party illusion. My point is right now.
It's very vivid.
Especially to other Republicans or can rather conservatives
that are of the mind that all Republicans
are the same way they are, where they're
questioning all these different things and all a
sudden, they're going, why don't they wanna question
this?
Because it's only in the interest of the
agenda. That's that's what a lot of these
high level people. Now who are acting like
they're on your side or,
that's what they're like.
Sheryl Atkinson points while that's an interesting point.
Here is the account of music again showing
this person speaking to Democrats,
asking them about the event,
I find this And I think it's this
1AM wake up as well. I find this
to be fascinating.
What you're gonna see here are all Democrats
like without question.
Without even thinking about it, Nowhere it was
staged, completely staged event, which is hilarious because
in most cases they that would act all...
Again, when I say this when I'm talking
about the, like, democrats republicans, which I don't
even think of the majority. That's not the
same as liberals as a conservative of people
in the middle. I sound... I kinda differentiate
it. There's overlap for sure. But, I mean,
people that are, like, blindly locks up with
the agenda, believe their Democrats it's like something
they'll align with even when the... Party goes
in different direction when they feel the aligned
with the party. Right?
The theater people that would history be almost
in every other context act like it's like,
irresponsible. You know, be an adult. We can't
call things staged and fake... You know, that's
what conspiracy theorist do. Right?
Here they are going, It's completely staged. Why
because that seems to be a line running
through the the in the media and the
left wing party right now? And what's weird
is you got Republicans,
who would normally be open to anything like
questioning at especially when it's a biden situation
going, nit picking every little point, which we
should,
questioning whether this makes sense. That makes sense
enough this event is rife with those points,
which a lot of public rather conservatives you're
calling out,
and you got Republicans who are going, look
at I've done these democrats are calling at
stage like the conspiracy theorist.
It's... You just can't miss this Teeter or
Taught... Flipping of the roles. It always happens,
and this is 1 of these moments where
you wake a few more people up to
the bigger picture, not the left bad guy
right back guy, but the big picture, the
2 party illusion picture that this happens all
the time. I check this out.
Oh, it's a false flag. False flag. Yeah.
False flag. People somebody died and 2 people
injured, what do you think about that? False
flag. Yeah.
What's funny about that is that he's saying
that's try to highlight that they're wrong. So
people die all the time at false flags.
In fact, the best false flags rather most
effective,
usually involve people being killed.
If this was about Biden, that guy would
be screaming the same tune, I would argue.
False slack. I thought it was magnificent
staged. It was professionally done.
It almost looked real.
We were wait staged by who. Oh, by
mister Trump, of course, I think this whole
thing is staged. You think of staged. Yeah.
It depends on everybody.
View.
Yeah. You of the assassination attempt? What do
you think? Does it does it kinda of
depend on where you're standing, whether or not
you... Agree with the
assassination attempt or disagree with it?
I just don't see
agree I just don't see that being the
truth, but that's my... I just... I'd rather
just not make any. Really quick. What's the
what's what do you want The truth? What
do you mean? Oh, you just don't believe
it was an assassination attempt. Oh, no. These
don't. We're so
anti trump. I don't even want. Was it
a bad thing though.
I mean.
Was trying to pull out these very, you
know, to get these Gotcha moments to be
like, See You got the democrats are like.
Which by the way, it is, but it's
also what the Republicans are like. They're the
same thing. Different sides of the same game,
but they'll do the same thing. They'll be
pay. They'll be small, they'll cheer on the
attacks of people they don't like. It's just
so funny how they love to point it
out when the other side does it when
they all do it. But a bad thing
would you condemn it? Oh, that he got
shot out of course. Right. That's all, you
don't do that. That's all. Yeah. That's that's
really bad. No many exactly. You don't do
that was it staged probably?
Staged. Yeah. Okay. So you think Trump maybe
staged a fake assassination for support?
K.
And and and that resulted in somebody dying
and other people being critically injured. I certainly
could have. It's a silly way to present
that as if that means it's false, That's
an assumption. I... Obviously, that's possible. Obviously, that's
k... He's capable of that. As much as
they wouldn't want that to be the reality.
It's also just certainly likely that this was
carried out by as people have floated,
another... How about Israel as as I pointed
out before, just 1 of the possibilities in
order to sort of
gain support for Trump, which by the way,
has been a waterfall since that. Or another
argument you made is be somebody whether the
deep state or the Democrats or in another
country kind of saying more this more lines
up with the idea of, like, a... Internal
shadow government concept saying, you know, we'll let
you be president again, but you better recognize
that you can't step out of line.
Now all these are certainly possible. Based on
all the evidence, what we already went through
seems to be the most... Like, I would
argue this clearly seems like there were shots
fired. It clearly seems that there were people
that were shooting in fact. So clearly, the
point is that it's not saying there was,
in my opinion, like, literally nothing happened, but
you could argue that within all of that
still there was a fake ear thing. And
so I'm not even saying I think that.
I'm just saying as both Jan and Derrick
and the rest of it, to dismiss these
things,
Out of hand, it just seems it seems
lazy.
But, of course, the ideas is that those
are identified as conspiracy theory at this moment
even by the Republicans.
Which seems out of character,
you're not allowed to say it because you're
just crazy and
back and forth and back and forth we
go. Haven't seen the news today. I'm not
here for the news. Seen anything I'm on
vacation. So you just thought it was they
was fake. You get the point. You could
spot you give a half more of it,
more people. It's the same damn thing.
I haven't And she says Trump arrangement syndrome
is a real. Yeah. It is. And it
works both ways. Right? It's exact same thing
both ways.
Now Elon Musk highlights another point, that what's
some points about him in a second.
I find this to be an interesting point
as well. He says someone wishing death on
the leading Us Presidential candidate and myself is
paid to do so by the German government.
And after this is the video for her
simply. It says I, you know, weren't saying,
wishing harm on both of them.
Well, okay. I agree. I think that's wrong.
It is free speech.
That's the reality, you
But what's funny about it
is that not funny, but it's it's it
overlap
isn't this what we see all the time?
From all of these people.
Didn't Elon tweet, we can we can coo
whoever we want. We can resume change whoever
we want, which includes killing presidents, which is
what happens all the time or the fact
that
many people in our in our position to
power in this government, like Lindsey Graham, for
example, have openly called for the assassination of
leaders many times,
even Trump has said many things that ins
the assassination president, yes, it happens all the
time. But, of course, it's only bad when
it's done toward the Us government. Then it's
unacceptable political violence is unheard of.
This
we live in a we... This ridiculous fantasy
world.
But of course, when it comes from that
position when clearly, Elon has played this leading
roll down, where all this seems to be
going, they're just narrative managing. They're they're driving
this zoom direction that makes seem like they're
the persecuted, which it's... I just don't think
it's the case.
But, yes, we should this out, like, we
should call it out anywhere. But let's be
just be balanced about this. Guys, and realize
that we have this happening constantly.
Call from within, highlight, Obviously, I've seen plenty
of Democrats call for the death of Trump,
but I've seen the same thing in reverse.
I've seen plenty Republicans call for the death
of Biden or plenty of others.
More so the point is about foreign leaders.
Right? Without the point of making here. And
I... It is is
everywhere that you've seen people do that especially
from the republican side when it comes to
foreign conversations. Or how about just Trump Saas
people like Sole
or coo other governments and have it's constant,
guys. So I think it's a little bit
of a critical. Right? Here's an Same example,
same point different... Same kind of point different
example.
This to tweet from Tim Wise as you
later deleted it that says the the fist
pump after Trump was, quote, shot
or after Trump was, quote, shot is too
perfect.
Which a lot of republicans are saying too,
including Dawn as we showed you. No way
someone thinks to do that after an actual
assassination at attempt which I'm gonna agree with.
It seems like that would happen possibly,
That's what a mag script writer would write
though.
Right? Of course, through conspiracy theory, which, of
course, if this was the republican about Biden
it would over queue and all, oh, that's
complete. Point is it a possible, but to
present it as if it's a fact, I
also think it's ridiculous, both sides do it.
Means and deleted it though. But isn't Ravi
Starbucks how to say. I hope Trump and
the families of victims shot yesterday sue the
hell out of these people.
If Alex Jones has to pay, make these
people pay too.
Talk about hypocrisy. Okay. So we spend the
last however long, screaming and I agree with
why what's happening to Alex is wrong.
Can't okay. And here we have somebody
doing a very small specific 1 time example
of what they claim Alex. I me get
it You know my opinion on that. I
think Alex is being persecuted regardless my pains
about him.
But this is 1 person 1 time tweeting
1 thing and deleting it versus an entire,
you know, series of conversations about a larger
event which they collect. And you want him
to be paying for that?
I don't think either of them should pay
for anything. They have the right to save
these things, But suddenly, you're gonna come out
and take the completely hypo critical stance that
that should be the case even though you
just spent all this time saying that what
happened... I mean, come on, guys.
You... Even if you just wanna say he's
trying to make a point, which you... I
get.
It's the same thing we keep seeing from
partisan people.
The moment that it interests them, they go
do it to them, Do it to them,
and we should call it out and say
gross.
Or question whether these people are really in
the interest of truth.
I just wanna include this. Here's Alex Jones,
on top of the video we showed you
day today where you're saying the deep state
try... You know, killed him which, again, as
opinion framed this fact. I'm saying that our
gods better than their God. That's why we
won. It just... I just don't this is
getting
kind of eerie for me with the way
these things are going with religious overlaps. Somebody
just saying 1 of the recent show that
just, like praying holes. I... It's... I mean,
I'm a christian, and I find this to
be weird.
But here's a new video from the fifteenth
that says deep state may use tactical nukes
to to kill Trump.
Then dash, elon Musk, Alex Jones Tucker Carlson
and Joe Rogan to be next.
Love I was talking about himself. I mean,
come on. So now here's how we're supposed
to read this? Ro Tucker Alex and Elon
or this...
I, what's what's the next word from Trifecta,
a 4 group of 4 people. 4 horse
with apocalypse
who are, like, the leading group that are
somehow now tied in with Trump and some
kind of leading a, what... How would you
even take that?
Talk about Hub.
Very humble. Like, we you 4 or somehow
this... Why would they go after you for?
What's the connection? Because you're republicans?
Because your leaders in this movement. I mean,
come on. This whole thing feels long.
Very wrong.
Whitney Web highlights and this is the same
kind of vein of conversation as William Wright
says replaced entire secret service with Eric Prince
Private security. Right? Because they the good guys.
Right?
Many millions of young rand will report tomorrow
morning for initial training.
Really?
Academy,
contract kill... I mean, come on, You know
how many things they're involved with that are
overt...
I mean, it's it's crazy, guys.
The mindset of these people as long as
it leans in our right direction, Republican, then
they don't. Good, bad, evil good is just
this this binary way of thinking.
Whitney new webb says, make black water great
again. The 6000 plus people who like this
tweet must have the memory of a goldfish
and forget the black water acted as an
un accountable
Cia death squad during the so called war
on terror, known as the war of terror.
And then elon musk comes in and we'll
get into the Trump Vance part of this
and says Trump vance
sounds with victory.
Alright. You know, not to mention that Vance
apparently Hate Donald Trump pushed max at mask
and vaccine band mandates despite saying different later,
wildly pro israel actively... I mean, all these
things. But, you know, yay, victory because all
we care about is their republican party apparently.
Well, let's talk about that. Here's Jd Vance,
telling you he's a never Trump.
Well, makes sense of this for me?
A d Vance in his own words. I'm
a never Trump guy. I never liked him
with somebody who doesn't like Trump. I might
have to hold my nose and vote for
Hillary Clinton. I didn't vote for Trump because
I can't stomach Trump. I think that he's
obnoxious him being raped really outrageous vincent. On
Twitter, vance called Trump, quote, rep,
an idiot and vance loves mitt Romney. I'm
a never Trump guy. That's the re B,
Jd d Vance.
Now made by what cheap trump's her and
showed. Right?
He's only posted it. B But what he
said, Now obviously, most of those videos are
older, or you can see these little chu
so on, but
that just changes all of a sudden?
Because you have a political opening? Yeah.
Because maybe he's making all that up in
the first place for his political benefit then
and they're just saying this now for the
same political benefit. Who knows best you think?
They lie about whatever. They live about everything.
Maybe them they even have real opinions. They're
just a automaton to say what you need
to hear so you can vote for them.
It's crazy that people overlook this stuff.
Not everybody though. See, Syrian girls share in
this, treat Trump's... These are cheap Trumps. These
are people that are Republicans
or right conservative that are clearly at least
leaning in Trump's direction but calling this out.
Usually, the way these these these things take
shape is that it's kind of like,
either Trump's amount doesn't see it, Right? Or
it's like the... It's the deep state trying
to manipulate it, or you know what but
it they never acknowledge. Same with like Twitter.
Oh, Y. Must have done. Didn't see. Like,
where's that even coming from. You're just making
that up to fit what you want to
be the reality. How about you? It's obvious
that he's involved with all this stuff. The
point is that you can't be pretend. And
it's like this is not something in involves
Trump, but they kinda tend to do that.
After
rat not... Like Rat. Excuse me,
of going underground. Says Donald Trump's vice president
Pick, j jd Vance pledged, like all of
them literally almost everybody and maybe out say
for Jill Stein have openly
pledged
and in regard to people that are acknowledged
essentially,
has Jd Vance pledged to be a, quote,
strong advocate for Israel in the senate? You
know, welcome committing Genocide. We got you back.
Red blue, he points out. No matter who.
Israel is the winner in every Us election,
hundred percent.
That's what we need to start acknowledging.
Here he is simply saying, I gotta be
honest with you. I don't really care what
happens to Ukraine either way, which is interesting
because a lot of people are even highlighting
him as a bad example of what we
want. Are saying, see, he doesn't even wanna
support brain. It's like, we're good. I would
hope to that I hope not. But in
my point here is that it's to Need
like, I don't care. I am care.
These people are manipulator, guys.
Here he is, in case you care about
this more than anything else.
In 01/14/2022,
mind you? Well, well into this. In 20
20, I was proving to you that masks
were hurting people. If not, you know, especially
not statistically significant producing transmission, which is still
the easily pro fact.
I would that, you know no matter... Check
out our earlier work. Saying this well ahead
of this conversation. American hospitals are overwhelmed. And
he said in 20 22, it's time to
take this seriously.
Which by the way, that also was not
even true. He says, at a start, let's
fire
thousands of nurses who refused to get to
vaccine,
That will help.
This is what you wanted as your vice
president, guys,
think about this. Here's the other 1.
That vaccine and mask mandates
in New York are working great to stop
this spread,
really leading into that. So insofar as firing
nurses for not doing it. Who cares about
constitutional rights. Right? Take the guns first, deal
with the courts later, Trump Famously said, well,
me said something to common.
Now here's something that's been circulating. We played
this morning on a wake up.
It's a clip that was, you know, which
again, which Think it's funny,
played
posted by died suddenly with no indication of
where it came from because that's really honest.
Right? Account... By the way, an account I
even get into.
The whole thing was a complete I up
my opinion. Died suddenly came out that that...
With... At a time when searching for died
suddenly in quotes was literally highlighting, how many
people were shown to Die suddenly. Then it
came out with their movie in quotes, which
completely overs overshadowed the ability to search for
that. And within that movie, there was a
lot of false a lot of mis representation,
which even people that were showing that movie
came out in the say publicly.
I've convinced that... And of course, that's the
stu Peter's overlap and all these people that
I'm I'm convinced a are not on your
side,
absolutely lying or at least being,
you know, lazy in their work in a
lot of different ways. But nonetheless, the point
of this account I'm just highlighting first, did
not
demonstrate where it came from, which is ridiculous
as I was a pretty popular and famous
clip it was posted by the son of
R junior. It's on his account,
and they just take it post it, take
it out their own, in a leaked video.
Okay? Does it say that you got it
from his son anywhere in there? That's great
great integrity you guys have to call that
out. Point is, It's a video of Donald
Trump speaking with R that apparently just happened.
And in it, R talks to about vaccines
and Trump seems to... You know, the point
is he seems to kind of push back
on the shots being too large for infants,
but still endorse this concept. But at the
end of the day,
How do you say this while allowing if
not pushing operational warp speed? It just seems
ridiculous to me that people buy into any
of these people. Whitney Webb says the efforts
to re brand papa work speed, Trump as
a vaccine skeptic rise to a new level.
Has Vp pick in invest in gene therapy
that's Vance, and biotech companies. You guys are
being played so hard.
Of course, they are. And the people like
died suddenly accounts and the rest of them
guys, they don't care they're pushing,
whatever gets them attention to my opinion.
Here's Derek Ike, highlighting Whitney said on... In
regard to another point about the Vp. She
says, with Trump's Vp pic being a Pro
of Peter T, which he is
You can kiss critical reporting from Alt media
on his campaign goodbye sends
funds most of the big names through Rumble.
And other aspects. He says not that there
was really any to begin with, which she
says Peter T has been working with Us
intelligence for decades
along overlapping with Elon musk to p many
of his worst projects and ops. Companies he
confounded c founded and funds are at the
heart of the surveillance police state war on
domestic terror to come.
Why won't more adult media expose him?
Exactly.
And Ga I highlight this and says, and
his wife for received a Bill Gates sponsored
scholarship and then served on Bill Gates scholarship
committee.
All these things that Republicans would freak about
in regard to buy to anybody else, how
much you wanna bet they ignore it? Not
conservatives, there's gonna be a lot of conservatives.
But the party leading
republicans. And the big name she's highlighting that
are being
funded heavily through Rumble other platforms.
And that's not even necessarily say that Rumble
is the thing, but I I I'm the
only thing I say it like that is
to be objective. My gut tells me there's
something off about it, but I can't prove
any of that. And we're getting lots of
reach through these days. My point is I
don't see why rumble different than Youtube. It
has all the same choke points and all
the same overlap. I just don't get it.
And that to me says more than anything
else. But David Ike follows up and says
global as Peter T business partner, Jd Vance
is Trump's running mate. What a few days
for Trump. The shooting,
financial and promotional support from me elon Musk
and other billionaires I'll show you in a
second. The dropping of criminal charges over classified
documents today, the republican nomination convention, 2 days
after the shooting at which she was made
J Vance is as what he made at
which he made J Vance potential Vice president.
Vance is the business associate Peter Peter T,
who
serves on the steering committee of the global
Bi group. All these big points and is
the founder of pal which provides surveillance and
other tech for the Pentagon and intelligence network.
Feel vance also invest in, gru and fund
the Roman Catholic Hollow prayer app promoted by
people like Russell brand. T was on Trump's
transition team after he won an election in
2016,
quite an anti global as anti deep state
lineup up then.
Obviously, being, facet about that. I mean, it's
the same as last time.
It literally was at the deep state. It
was a... It was it was not draining
the swamp. It was using the swap. And
of course, oh, we gotta have insiders to
fight the inside well, what happened? 1 by
1, they all be getting the bad guys
again. Bro, bolton no bill barr oh, Pompeo.
They turn on Trump. No they were always
the bad guys and either got played or
he was going along with it for the
beginning. Here we are again, so probably going
along with it. They
Patrick Ken highlights what Vance was saying about
foreign policy.
Actually, let me just play you as Clip
first.
People recognize that we need to do something
with Iran, but not these weak little bombing
runs, If you're gonna punch the iranians, you
punch a barn, and that what he did
we took out some money. By the way,
that action, people said that it would lead
to brought warm and actually brought peace and
actually checks the Iranians and slowed them down
a little bit. But let me just say
something about this this iran issue because maybe
the most important diplomatic breakthrough of the Trump
administration was the the Abraham boards. If you
wanna check Iran, the way to do it
is to... My, god. Just 1 buzz pull
bolt pulling after another.
Like, are we actually... Mean, really,
the idea of what he's saying here? The
idea... Like, Sole was an an illegitimate extra
judicial assassination of a... Of a diplomat at
that moment of a highly respected general that
is not a terrorist,
but either way, whether you think about it
or not,
cover of a diplomatic peace talk through Saudi
Arabia. It was in Iraq in an airport,
and they murdered him without any congressional approval.
How do these people say the step for
the straight phase? I don't care whether you
think it was good or not
100
percent legal, but rules based international order. Right,
guys?
Mean some of the things he says.
People said that it been lead to brought
award.
The assassination did lead to Broader War. In
fact it led you Americans dying with the
attacks that it were in response to that.
Which according to the israel everybody else's is
called self defense.
The point though is that it led far
far look at where this is right now.
He's pretending it led to peace.
Link this guy's delusional or as I think
we know,
not on your side. It actually brought peace
that actually checked the iranians and slowed them
down a little bit. But Slowed down bit.
Right. I mean, it's just it's it's such
a childish... Like, the world lacks when Us
politicians make statements about iran. It's it's... I
mean, I assume if the still pretend, like,
Iran is some back water, like, it's it's
such a ridiculous framing. And, you can disagree
with their... With their overlap the way their
government works.
Right? With the religious overlap the theo. Like
the point is that the the claims that
there's somehow these this back world
terrorist funding. I it's just ridiculous.
I mean, in the sense the way they
frame it. I mean, I I will highlight
that every government in the world takes these
kind of illicit actions, but the way that
they frame them is just cartoon ish. But
it works for certain people in certain party
lines. Well, let me just say something about
this this iran issue because maybe the most
important about... A breakthrough the Trump administration was
the Abraham accord. Right. The thing that literally
went nowhere. The Accord that pushed governments that
to align with Israel when many of them
ended up going the other way, we have
things that are falling apart with Saudi Arabia,
it's something that never even actually came full
to fruition. But he's going look look this,
I it changed everything.
We're talking about israel mind you. He's literally
talking about a a group committing
genocide, and the benefit of forcing the governments
to align with them regardless of how it
affected their people? Yay.
Freedom and stuff. Just these guys are ridiculous
If you wanna check Iran, the way to
do it is to 1,
withdraw their oil money, which for show been
bad about, but you
also gotta enable the israelis in the sun
air of states to work together and actually
provide a counter ballots to iran. Right. So
let the people come in genocide have more
power. Biden has been nothing. You can't be
good infrastructure there sitting there to weaken can
Iran to strengthen our ally as real.
So what's this idea that we have to
week iran. Like, the the... It all comes
from an Israeli push under the guys that
they're driving for nuclear weapons, which even the
United States is now art... Clearly, the piece...
The international,
the Ia, the international Atomic Energy agency, as
well as Us. Intelligence have openly said that
that's not the truth anymore.
More than once, I've I've shown you on
the show. I yet they keep arguing for
what last 30 40 years. That they're about
to have luke weapon.
This game they play about trying to stop
them. The point is that's the only reason
it makes sense to argue in their mind
Iran must be stopped.
Otherwise, if you can't frame those a terrorists
and d, they'll make it about nuclear weapons,
it's a sovereign country with people that want
that you're just taking a legal action to
stop them
What all you're really doing is starving them,
and bombing them and in in certain... In
manipulating within their country and trying to overthrow
their government, and, you know, because they're bad
guys.
Or they're just a government, like, every other
1 and you're actively trying to
manipulate what you're... It's it's illegal is the
point. No matter how you spin this.
When they sit there and talk like this,
the world looked at them and says illegitimate.
Criminal.
Roundabout, guys, Americans are even coming to terms
with this right now.
Biden said nothing with it. Donald don't trump
and rein. I think what...
Though what? Patrick Ke says? Sun Arab states.
You mean the Gcc Monarchs. Right? Like, what
he's talking about are things like
I mean, there... There's many different examples
about these these countries that are
exactly the opposite of what they claim they
want. We're leading
in the world except, you know, Saudi Arabia,
which is a open monarch
dictatorship that commits all of human rights violations
we claimed that we don't support or Israel
committing genocide.
It's it's it's kind point through just making.
It's a laughable
dishonest lie that everybody sees through and they
just keep saying it any way. People like
Nikki Haley, for example, such as these mi
con...
Like, they're just archaic. Like these they don't
even recognize how out of date they are
even with what their own people are saying.
But he he's his punch Ron.
He says, unfortunately, J Vance is getting his
middle his talking points from Apa pack. That's
what this is. Hey, get... He goes, hundreds
of thousand dollars from, like the rest of
them do, he goes from Apa pack, Heritage
and Lindsey Graham, which means he knows absolutely
nothing on his own.
That won't work. They want war with Iran
and the axis of resistance to obliterate the
native the native Palestinians,
Syria Hezbollah, etcetera. War with Tehran would be
a massive mistake. And Look, I don't even
know if they know that or not, but
it's
undeniable. That's the same point they're I'm making
right now with israel the reason
they would be right now, even... If Iran
Got pulled into this, you would see the
same dynamic. The Us would point is based
on even Us people,
who are speaking objectively about this, that the
the Us and Israel would not win that
war.
Anything could happen, but logistically,
based on any number of overlaps, they've shown
that this is something that even the Us
is aware of. Definitely Israel israel's is aware
of that, whether we're talking about Lebanon ron,
number of them. They're they're failing against gossip
right now.
But they still say these things, which are
dangerous. They put your lives at risk by
making these statements.
And he says War Wrong will be a
massive mistake and will mark the end of
Us presence in the region and likely the
end of its israel project.
He would do well to check the with
the Pentagon on how those war games went.
Usa and Israel woo is making the same
point. And interestingly enough, Candace owen Chimes name.
Same clip.
And says,
wow, this Chris man says a lot of
people recognize... Oh, it's the same... Just highlight
we said. Can says, like it like, is
it possible for us to get 1 effing
person in office who doesn't immediately speak about
how we need to continue bombing to be
the least.
These are republicans,
conservatives.
This is this whole thing is falling apart.
And I... It's a, I keep highlighting. It
is a time for people like us to
highlight the truth for people that are starting
to see everything.
The point is
This is the running mate for for trump,
which I argue candace is a supporter of.
And simply going for crying out loud. Like,
this is what we talk about. Like, this
is bell. And she says, we do not
need to do anything with the wrong.
Sign that start listening maybe to it, even
their own people want. Right? But they don't.
Here's what the Us just said
today.
Us received intel of Iranian plot to assassinate
Trump and look at that. Round around we
go. Now we're turning in the entire thing,
probably into an attempt la to a side...
It just didn't have to be the evidence.
You float the narrative like this, then you
keep that people's minds Well, Ron probably try
to take out Trump.
So how easy that is. Based on nothing,
but internal sources say, which is usually lies,
which are usually lies, and of course, Cnn
reports.
This is how this works. Like, this this
may not even be what this all was
about. It's just simply taking a in. Never
let a good crisis go waste.
Mari Henson highlights this about Musk overlap and
Jd Van saying elon Musk computer the, invested
in Reed Hoffman company deep dream
Read
was the 1 to bring Peter T to
meta to become an angel investor. Deep mind
is responsible for creating deep fakes or cheap
fakes they're all in bed together. So it's
ever last more so with El elon, Elon,
which I I had a little bit out
of order. This was over here the point
about what we're about to get him Elon.
Is that all of this leads in the
same direction with Elon, Ai,
Twitter,
and now the overlap with with Vance and
Trump and with theo and everything's just this
inc...
We're seeing the outlines of this new power
structure, guys, and it's doesn't doesn't look good.
So we have an example of them working
with a company that makes deep fakes and
and Twitter is supposedly stopping this, we're about
to have a very dangerous future if we
can't see what's coming.
And guess what? Elon musk pledges 45000000
dollars a month
to Donald Trump's Super pac.
Think about that.
So Elon is apparently funding the new presidency.
So who's actually in charge here? Who's actually
controlling things. I'm not even suggesting yield elon.
My point is, I think this is much
more complicated than a lot of the norm
pretend it is. I think that's obvious.
For crying out loud, guys.
I mean, it this is just
a little bit disconcerting to be honest with
everything we're highlighting, and this gets even worse.
Check this out. This is Or shared this
with me. This is a post on Twitter
from x ai.
X ai.
It's and it's just sit a minute an
image for the pod for the podcast of
Elon Musk, plugging in cords in the server
bank, saying come health x ai I wrote.
Photons as the elite fiber tech... Excuse me
in Memphis?
Interesting. Well, what is X ai?
X ai as g reports is a Da
explain Ai program, a da program. Great.
That was launched to create a suite of
machine learning techniques,
that produce more explain models while maintaining high
levels of learning performance. So in otherwise, in
other words,
machine learning that is learning from you as
you engage with Twitter is how I would
read that. Right? Machine learning that can also
produce
that produce more explain models, while maintaining high
levels of learning performance.
We're being used to train something much bigger.
That's what I keep talking about. It says
the goal was to generate a portfolio of
methods that would give future to build offers
a range of design options that cover the
performance versus explain ability trade space. The program
aimed
to enable end users to better understand trust
and manage offers artificially intelligent systems.
Here's the here's a study that you shared
with me from 20 21,
It says Da explain Ai or X Ai
program.
Here's what it reads. Defense, advanced research projects
agency, Da, which Whitney covered a lot during
C T lab around the Covid 19 time
frame about the injectable nano platforms and the
nano technology and and all the different... Things
that were, like, the basis for what I
think ended up going on.
All these dark overlaps. I mean, even the
dark direct connections with these to Trump's administration...
I mean, all these overlaps. Hhs, Nonsense said
Sal malawi and the programs in the military
operation works speed. There's there's a whole, Mean,
even like the what's it called.
I have the great you with the,
Destiny,
shoot.
I'm forgetting your entertainment. Wait. We had a
great interview, me see if I can grab
it real quick.
Here it is.
I'll include that for you guys
as it loads. But... So it... We talked
about this idea of the... I think it
was the
was a called restrict. I'm just blanking on
the stuff. You know your mind you we
get to such a different topics.
Resilient Excuse me. The resilience program. And she...
This is her. She had did an amazing
job breaking this all down.
And all point was exactly the same conversation,
like this the complete Dod overlap in the
the... As we Tyler the military intelligence hand
driving the Covid 19 injections. Right. So bringing
this back, the overlap of the military aspects,
the this is these this...
It's a da formulated
the explain
artificial intelligence or x Ai program in 2015.
So explain for me why now it's being
presented in some new Elon musk overlap. And
it says with the goal to enable end
users to better understand trust and effectively manage
artificially intelligence the systems exactly like we just
saw.
In 2017,
the 4 year x Ai research program began.
Now it comes to an end in 20
21.
Interesting. It is time to reflect on what's
succeeded. But, I guess, it's not over now.
I guess it's being be rep
and represented it. As this usually does.
So you could read more about this. I'm
probably gonna go through this more in depth
in a future show. I'd find that to
be pretty unnerving or include this for you,
me add this to the show notes.
Oh, this just so I didn't miss that
if it went away. And then here is
the page for it. Publicly searched on Google
and it simply says over here,
X ai corp
doing business as X ai is an American
startup company,
working in the area of artificial intelligence, which
apparently was founded by Elon Musk in 20
23.
Headquarters in San Francisco, which he would just
did a whole thing screeching about how they're
gonna move to Texas, with 1 company, but
seems like a lot more or in San
Francisco and California still. Font seems funny.
But ask yourself how this lines up. If
we're literally... I mean, it's even the exact
same,
like, the way that the the logo, I
mean, everything,
Bring this back up,
Just trying to reopen the pages for you
whole line. Didn't mean to forgot I was
gonna look at them again.
Right. So it's just the the the overlap
of this with the way those look and
what this ultimately was. The... And so here's
G telling you.
Right? That this is the the Twitter Ai
telling you is a Da program. So let
me... The the what worries mean is that
if this is a da program that's supposedly
ended in 0.21,
how is it now...
Founded 20 23 by Elon Musk is Musk
just some kind of front for what's actually
going on. I mean, you guys decide for
yourself. I find it to be a little
unnerving. Here's now the current front facing it,
you know,
website it says g in the background,
sign in with Twitter.
We're we're we're I think we're being used.
I think we're being used train this guys.
I really do.
You guys can decide yourself.
Now to finish,
reasonably quickly since that were already past 3
hours. I just wanted to highlight some of
the stuff so going on, and we're definitely
gonna have more shows.
If not tomorrow whenever the next show is
very soon highlighting what's continued to happen in
Israel, guys rather occupied Palestine. We cannot stop
paying attention to what's going on.
Every moment this becomes a more historical re
genocide.
It's unbelievable. This is still even happening.
So
while what's going on over Trump
completely took all the oxygen out of the
room, which may very well be 1 of
the reasons that's happening? Like, look, I mean,
again, broadening it out into other possibilities?
Look at what just happened with this? Do
you not see an obvious motive for somebody
like Israel to do what they just did
to
completely derail anybody's focus, like everybody's talking about
something else, even we just covered that.
Having an end part of the show to
cover all the gen going on. Think about
that.
Just 1 of the many possibilities. Now, Gaza
notifications highlights on the fifteenth, Israel killed 320
people in the last 48 hours.
Think about that spike between the fourteenth and
the fifteenth. When this was going on,
320
in the last 48 hours.
That's an increase as far as I can
tell, and We usually see every day, at
least jen what we can prove anyway. I
frankly think it's a hell of a lot
more than we even realize.
Ram abdul showed you on the fourteenth when
everybody was looking elsewhere, and I already showed
you this israel re bombed, another you... And
you... Another Un school. Killing children. And in
A Rock camp again,
despite all the narratives of what they've secured
and whatever else is going on. And it's
terrific, guys,
dead children people laying everywhere, strewn across the
ground. It's everywhere.
It is everywhere.
Then... But Be are also on the fourteenth.
While that's a different bombing.
As she points out while everyone assess with
Zion as Trump relentless bombardment of Northern Gaza,
Northern Gaza continues.
So we got bombing in a. We got
bombing in A Milwaukee. We got bombing in
North... They're bombing everywhere. Is what we're all
trying to tell you.
People... Dead bodies littered across the streets, not
even a narrative about Hamas anymore, which Now,
Vanessa falls up on the sixteenth and highlights
another bomb. Israel was not satisfied with the
recent massacre Was and the Refugee camp therein
in. They just bombed again, slaughtering more children
and civilians on the pre pretext of quote
targeting a off. Trust me, this blood letting
genocide is because Trump or Biden. Israel knows
it has Us green light to exterminate Palestinians.
Guys, it is constant.
Breaks my heart.
Ti highlights
on the sixteenth.
Israel is executing entire families with Us arms
so simply for being palestinian while Biden talks
about how all political violence should be condemned.
Family killed
altogether
every day.
Forensic architecture highlights as with relentless targeting of
hospitals, Israel's regular attacks on this so called
humanitarian zone in Alma,
threatened to normalize such flag violations of international
law, the deadly strike on Saturday
is just 1 in a series of repeated
attacks on the designated safe zones, the supposed
humanitarian zones which don't even exist. They've mapped
10
attacks since May sixth. Within the safe zones.
Which by the way, again,
Already covered this. Had won
October 20 second, proving they were bombing families,
We have many other human rights reports or
Ui reports proving they're doing the same, and
this is the whole thread.
Architectures are doing a great job is. Proving
it with forensics that they are doing. You
don't much need that to be honest.
Craig Mo highlights this and says, Israel has
murdered 200
United Nations staff in Gaza, many with their
families, kidnapped and torture countless others, attack Un
humanitarian facilities and vehicles, By the way, including
other humanitarian workers like case KWCK
kitchen and and, doctors stop borders and any
number of examples targeting...
Key mandatory humanitarian workers.
Attack Un humanitarian facilities and vehicles lied about
and smeared the organization and now has to
store Un headquarters in Gaza,
and still senior Un officials and spokesperson continue
to tie tip toe around the subject. The
Un has a duty who directly condemn this.
To name the perpetrators and to demand individual
criminal accountability for them. And the name of
the Un charter, it is time for the
sick us
What is that the
security... The S g? And leader senior leaders
to speak out against Israeli apartheid? Senator colonialism
and genocide without fear.
Secretary general. I was thinking of security council,
but know, secretary general.
I agree with them.
Cuts news network highlights this video, which is
very easy to see. As there's... I mean,
this is a the weirdest part about this
that this is... They're smiling toasting this on
Tiktok and instagram, laughing about it. There's even,
like these disgusting as many of us have
shown. These tick these telegram snuff channels where
they play the most... I mean, stuff that
will give you nightmares. If you have any
soul, any heart, any... If you're compassionate at
all.
Horrifying pictures of dead children, and then all
of them laughing and sharing emojis and share...
It it's disgusting.
Many of these have been shown, the 1
that got highlighted early was directly from the
Id. And These are approval facts.
Here's another example of 1 thing of 1
example of this. Cuts network call, the footage
that was posted by an Israeli soldier those
posted themselves.
Documenting how they were laughing and amused by
shooting random mortar fire on Palestinian civilians who
just happen to be on the beach.
This is their life.
By the way, get hosted by then.
Be didn't hear their talking in the background.
Guys. Hear that.
They're just having a good old time. Shooting
orders at random people on the beach.
That's the life they're living as we scream
about how it's matt Miller tries to tell
you they're investigating We're looking into it. The
issue been raised, They swore they didn't do
it.
Here's a post. I can't pronounce Seam M
fa,
post this, and it's just a good back
and forth to show you. Everything disturb me
says about the Id of campaign in Gaza,
but the thing that always strikes me is
how much Israel's is dedicated to destroying trees,
grass, everything that grows.
They want to pull those the strip with
the goal of having nothing left to show
humanity ever lived there. Maybe so they can
manufacture the illusion. They lie about how nobody
lived before they got there, but the point
is,
look at the difference.
This is what it looked like before they
did this, even as it was still occupied,
even as it was still being bomb that
attack. This is what this area look like.
This is what it looks like now.
It's like let it sink in.
Are we really gonna pretend that the trees
and the that were there hamas tunnels under
the trees? I mean,
destruction.
This is a racing,
Palestinians,
ethnic cleansing.
There's just no dis disregard that. On top
of that, as Sarah points out, they're also
involving Syria.
Again, on the thirteenth,
Israel's bombing sirius damascus in the middle of
the night.
Why?
Because they've been doing it for long before
October seventh and nobody cared then. They do
it whatever they wanna do distract over here,
Bob, maybe who knows what their intent is.
It's illegal it's the point no matter what
their narrative is.
Dan Cohen highlights what the Con is saying.
He said this they say literally, revenge is
a value
for us as a country and for us
as an army.
And this is not even a secret. 9
7 two's covered. You've even seen his israeli
politicians point this out. How made a whole
article about this that people are at... In
revenge and that's why you're seeing these videos
posted on tiktok, and many of them are
being allowed to because they I think that's
their outlet. So it shows you with impunity.
They don't they think they can get away
with this. Being from the highest levels. And
he says incredible that this doesn't get more
engagement. Videos of Israeli officials openly stating their
motives, which is revenge. For genocide, has become
so commonplace that a clip like this, just
considered ordinary falls in the background.
Disgusting. And if you wanna know what they're
doing, here Euro med human Rights group has
broken this down and a, I think a
7 part thread
showing you what they're doing. And all this
has been proven by source...
Made people that were abused by what they're
doing by Id officials who have whistle about
this,
1 of them which is really h just
I can't even understand how this is human.
Like,
this is the kind of thing that we've
talked about in history about some of the
most tests acts that sit with you forever
that you just go how is that possible?
Dogs as AAA
tool of torture and intimidation. And when they
I get into this, it's
Not just biting, guys, we're talking about physical,
sexual and psychological assault using by dogs on
Palestinian.
Many, many people. This was highlighted by human
rights Groups have been raped by dogs that
were trained to do this in prisons by
israeli soldiers.
I know that sounds ridiculous, but this has
been verified. This is absolutely group test.
Raping prison
prisoners detainees. And it it includes dogs as
a point, and they make that very clear.
Attacking and humility... Humiliating them with these dogs,
attacking civilians who did not comply with forced
orders.
Storming hospitals and terror staff and displaced persons
to force the to evacuate,
forcing prisoners detainees to mimic the sounds of
dogs and animals.
Number 6, forcing prisoners detainees to sleep on
dog droppings.
This is all very easy to prove. And
let's eat what's worse is They know they
know this. People like Matt Miller?
They just don't care.
And just in case you care to see
the overlap.
These are pictures from go guantanamo Bay. Let's
not forget who trained them to do this.
You'll find it striking the overlaps to what
we're seeing right now. To the kind of
stuff they did, what they're doing to people
they arrest,
There's a reason this step looks far too
ear similar.
You can look through the rep for yourself.
It's rough.
The worst parts of the ones where you
see them laughing and smiling, which became famous,
right,
for torturing people.
You know, why a lot of them were,
you know... Like, my train is even the
wrong word of the military. Broken down,
psychologically
manipulated into believing these people weren't human.
Whether or not you think they carried out
terrorist attacks. But the point is that they're
d the point to where even if they're
a terrorist, that if they weren't to human,
you would feel some kind of level of
like, feeling wrong about it. Because aren't... The
art... They supposed to be though the ones
that are spring democracy and in rules bay
law and order,
You don't, just go well, they did it
so we can, which is what I always
show you they actually are. Even if you
agree with it, what you have to acknowledge
is that means just as bad as they
are.
Willing to do the same and violate what
they what they claim is sacred.
Here's an example.
This person posted this to his own account,
military rabbi,
pint just beam tone from Alexa Dr Brigade.
Eunice row has been breaking the... He's matt...
Been they've been using his work in the
In the Icc because he's been proving this
stuff and he can't. Come He has all
the materials showing guys, They posted their own
accounts. He says here in Rim,
inside Ruined Gaza, there's nothing left of it.
This is what the war is about. He
says this is what we're fighting for. Point
right there, pointing to that. This is what
we want. The third temple.
There's American soldiers with that third temple patch.
These are people acting He's rabbi I'm acting
on prophecy. You know what that prophecy dictates
the destruction of Gaza.
It's but almost for pretend like it's just
about going after certain people. Right?
Here is an example proving that's not the
case. Showing you an Israeli soldier on the
pulpit holding a,
they're in a mosque,
and you can see explosives planted on the
walls behind them.
So as Scott Ritter pointed out. If they're
in the building, they already know that there's
not... It's not a it's secure. They know
it's secure, which means they're blowing it up
because they're blowing it up.
Not under some guise of going after Hamas.
You understand. So that is a pro war
crime. No matter what you think.
Now, warfare analysis highlights a settle from Central
Israel spent the last month. This is Israeli
Media. Mind you. Breaking into dozens of homes
in the West Bank, according to a source,
he stayed in the houses, ate their food,
cook their food, drink their alcohol, and after
a few days, move to the next house.
It all over again. Of course, the idea
doesn't care. Please don't care.
And it says not before entering empty it
all of jewelry, credit cards, other valuable items.
It's a it's a free for, guys. And
it's always been like this to a degree,
but post October seventh. Gave official status. These
these eagle rampant settlers are raping and pill
and steel. I mean, it's it's been covered
by corporate media. Even as we said,
Biden was about to sanction them until sm
which said something and they pulled back.
This is what's happening. So it's not just
Gaza. This is a war on Palestine. And
these people are
It shows you that there's always been like
these for people. They don't care about the
right. They don't have any.
Whether it's in West Bank or Gaza or
anywhere else.
Expat vibes highlight this video. Jewish settlers say
they conquer air countries to create greater israel
because God promised it to them.
I'm gonna play this in a later show.
The point is that this is a very
candid interview which there's a lot of them
or they're openly telling you what they're trying
to accomplish.
Ap highlights that far right extreme groups in
Israel that are blocking aid, million pretend not
happening and supported by the.
Guess what?
They're getting tax deductible donations from the Us
and Israel.
Totally don't support it though. Right?
Tax deductible their donations.
As they're literally blocking aid, which by the
way should invalidate even a government for getting
aid from the United States? Who cares though.
Right?
On top of that, we have in Israel
parliament, in they're in the Connected, they're putting
forward a bill,
oh, when calling for the closure permanently of
every single border crossing.
But, yeah, Elon Levy keep telling us about
how you're pushing to aid through. These people
are trying to close them publicly.
Entire... Indefinitely.
How that are they supposed... I mean, this
is the final step in my opinion to
the...
Famine that's already there, which is
so.
Zachary foster highlights about the apartheid. If you
live in Jewish west West jerusalem,
your water runs 24 hours a day, 7
days a week.
However, if you live
in east jerusalem,
which is Palace not gaza,
But jerusalem,
but just happened to be on the east
side of it, which is all for Palestinians.
Your water runs
1 to 2 days a week,
for only 429 hours in some cases.
You don't see how obvious that is, that
is a deliberate choice to make sure that
there's differences between Palestinians and between in in
between his israelis.
Very easy to see.
So, that's a apartheid for you. He says
not so complicated after all. It's called apartheid,
and this is an article from Israeli Media.
Tar. Tens of thousands of arabs live Jerusalem
without running water.
It will become a second gaza.
Which just how that happen. In fact.
It's very simple to see if you just
have... If you're honest about it.
When Cohen highlights a very interesting overlap. I'm
not sure it keeps clicking by the way.
It sounds like 1 of these platforms.
But what it's saying
is a really interesting point, and this is
what I keep trying to highlight for people.
Yes. There are Jewish zion. Yes. There are
Christian Zion, but I argue a lot of
them that called themselves either are actually religious.
Some of them like this guy just own
it publicly.
It says God is nowhere found. Don't look
for it instead, try to accept that none
of this matters. Agnostic atheist, zion king.
Right?
And here, he's responding to Dan Cohen. Dan
Cohen is calling out what the is what
Israel's is doing. According to the Supreme Court
in israel,
a jew who converse to Christianity is not
a jew.
Well, hold on. Aren't they the ones telling
you it's an ethnicity and not a religion
oops, Then over here, it says a jew
who becomes an atheist is a jew.
Okay? So again, prove you that it's actually
about zion. Judaism is not a religion. Judaism
was a nationality? That's what they're saying.
They're telling you that... Okay. What about all
the Jews that don't identify was Zion. What
about the Jews that don't believe in Israel?
You're telling us they're just not Jews? That
is the most obvious point I've ever seen
to show you zion is what it's about
and not judaism. It says zion is an
contradictory nonsensical and most of all,
genocidal ideology.
And he proves that to you with the
clip where they're saying this, guys.
And he responds saying the sick guy we
were pointing at the not the atheist scientist
saying cope.
You are no longer a jew, move on,
Dan Cohen responds by saying, quote, God doesn't
exist, but God gave us the land. Zion
is prove.
He's obviously joking, but think about how absurd
that is, how were you trying to push
back on him by saying that he's not
a Jewish.
When you're literally saying you don't believe god
exists.
Because they're trying to pretend it's like ethnicity.
They're just going full below zion now. We
don't even... You're not even allowed to be
a religious eye religious jew anymore. It's only
with yours
I mean, my god, At the very least,
recognized how completely
inconsistent this is.
There's a lot.
Of Jewish people in the world that do
not believe in Zion and do not believe
in the state of Israel.
Sarah O'donnell highlights, this... I actually couldn't believe
this at first just because it was so
blatantly stated,
Netanyahu has asked advisors to develop the plan,
aimed at, quote,
reducing the population of Gaza to the lowest
possible level. Well guess what? They're already doing
that. Now they just have a stated plan.
She says genocide. It's Here's the actual article.
Now this this is
a French article and it says, quote, Netanyahu
was asked advisors to develop a plan to
reduce the population.
That's it's... It's it's right there. The link
is there for you look at. Now, here's
it's crazy.
Not even the first time.
Here's an article from 20 23.
Netanyahu,
his goal for Gaza. Now look at what
look at what the date is, guys. December
third.
So
post this October seventh time frame, he already
said
that this is what we need to do,
thin the population to a minimum?
How is it not the most obvious thing
in the world what's actually happening? Now they
formal that plan, and they're rolling it out.
It's open
genocide, and the Matt Miller of the world
are
sm it on the whole way.
To finish here, How highlights this. And this
is our point, guys. This is what the
israeli media is saying. And we're being lied
to by z in our country.
Says, to move forward, Israel must accept that
it's lost the war,
That's wild.
That's not gonna happen, not from netanyahu got
from the the the religious eye of a
party, the Jewish power party, or anybody who's
coalition, they are wild and extremist.
Even according to Israelis, they're calling them extremist.
Point is, they don't care about losing. They
care about
driving in the prophecy if they believe in
that or simply not losing power. But any
case, what's the fallout, the genocide they're committing.
While Americans are being bullied into supporting it.
And just in case you want finish with
an example of that, Dan Cohen highlights this
for the first time,
from murray dot com, this is Israeli media
platform dot c.
For the first time, israeli military has now
openly admitted. It has shortages of tanks
shells, soldiers and many commanders who have been
killed in battle. They've they've been wanting I
go at this whole time. What this shows
you is another break between
controlled there for the political side and the
military admitting what's going on.
They've lost control northern than they... I mean,
they lost control in the first week as
I highlighted. They This is something in entirely
different. He says Israel's is losing in Gaza
and in no way prepared for the war
with Hezbollah,
despite what the leaders may say whether he
again, like bands and a rot, that this
is they're lying to you about everything, guys,
when you can read this article for yourself.
The Id
admits
that they are losing.
My god.
Well, we'll leave it there for today
There's a lot more we could get into
guys, but I've ultimately,
I'd like to believe that what's happening is
opening people's minds to a bigger truth.
Whether or not we even get the full
picture around Trump or anything else that clearly,
we must be able to see that there
are peep... There are manipulator.
Who pretend to be on your side whether
they're left or right who pull these strings
and push these narratives all for the explicit
interest of something other than your interest. Whether
it's for Israel, just simple control within the
2 party paradigm,
keeping their own financial interest going with the
status quo. I mean, who knows?
But now is there's never been a more
important time to drive this home to reach
the average person sitting next to you and
just... Change the dynamic.
I mean, I think everybody can see that
we need something different.
I'd like to believe we can do what
we pretend we are,
But at the very least, it's time to
do something different and not just go through
the same damn motions and wants the wheel
of the same political process. That by the
way, continues to allow
the worst things happen in the world, guys,
the genocide, the regime changes, the starvation tactics.
The funding of terrorism that they claim is
on everybody else while you can prove that
they're behind it.
Hoping people are starting to wake Mean, look,
I know they're waking up. I know that
you're waking up. It's time to try to
broaden that out other people that may not
be, but also stand back and recognize that
you're the majority.
I know it. Other I can see it.
The evidence is there. And it's not with
every topic and it's not always was in
the same page, but the majority
sees that we're being deceived, and they may
hope that Trump convict it or Biden the
guy, but we see it.
There's solidarity there. We can see that together.
So let's use it.
Thank you for tuning in again, guys. I
hope this opens some minds. If you wanna
support this platform, there is lots of links
down below. For you guys to support this
I mean, we are under attack both financial
attack, law, lawsuit,
censorship. I mean, if you're new to this
platform, guys, it it'll blow your mind.
III literally, whether Dallas Jones or anybody else.
I don't know anybody who has been sensors
for more platforms than T lab. I never
used to say that. But I... It's it's
easily pro at this point. Now you could
argue maybe the financial tax on Jones and
a larger scale, more followers, I guess. But
the sheer amount of platforms,
I just... I don't see anybody, which blows
mind, I never would have thought I'd be
in that position,
I I know that I do... I believe
and what I'm doing, I know that I
do what I think is right, that I
strive to be objective.
I know that. And I... I sleep... I
can sleep well at night because of that.
But there are people out there that would
love the frame it otherwise.
So your support means everything to me.
Thank you for being here. As always, question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.