Important to point out that we're not policing
the Internet for harmful material that we actually
rely on citizens to collect evidence to report
to the platform first
and then report to us if serious seriously
harmful content isn't taken down. So we were
really set up as a safety net when
when some of this falls through the cracks.
We're not seeking to become the content moderators
ourselves,
you know, we will believe that the platforms
build the digital roads. They also need to
wreck the digital guard rails and the safety
guard rails and be, you know, applying the
virtual seat belts.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most an
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Saturday, 07/13/2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm just... I'm actually just getting something in
the chat as we just started to go
live that apparently, I'm just trying to make
sure this is not not
incorrect.
Some people are reporting that Donald Trump was
just shot.
Let me just make sure that this... Let
me just bring this up for you guys,
and we'll we'll do this together live and
then we'll get it a normal show. Only
reason I would ever do this like this
abrupt is because this is actually whoever this
would be somebody as a presidential candidate would
be important or anybody for that matter.
So thank you for joining me today nonetheless
the. We have plenty to get into, just
literally, as we were get going live and
the opening was playing somebody posted in the
chat. And it does appear that this looks
like it might have actually happened. So let's
check this out together. Now today, what we're
gonna be focusing on after we look into
this
is the conversation of Twitter
Ga. And we... As we briefly mentioned the
other day, But the amazing fact around this
that the the hearing and the ongoing reality
of of, you know, Elon,
Ben Shapiro and everybody talking about Ga and
Ga being a part of Twitter now is
July first forward again, and no 1 seems
to be addressing that. I find this it'd
be really interesting.
Let me bring this up for you guys
real quick.
Okay. So let me... I just wanna show
you guys this. Let me grab the video,
and we'll play it and we'll see what's
going on here.
And just funny, on that note by the
way. I've some most a lot of people
seem to have the ability to play these
right on the stream yard, and it just
plays the audio. I can never seem to
get that to happen.
Oh, wow.
Okay. Let's check this out.
Is that blood on his face?
Okay. That was a really short clip. Somebody
else just sent me something. Hold on.
I rarely like to do this just because
it's, you know, often so much misinformation flying
around.
And it's hard to be able to discern
this in real time.
Yeah. So
reports from somebody that I don't like to
rely... You know, that I rarely see spreading
confirmed information.
His ear was hit and his neck.
And it's saying that he fell to the
ground opening remarks, but got up and was
taken away. So this seems to be breaking
news as we're talking right now. Please let
me know in the chat guys if something
else is going on.
And we'll we will definitely be talking about
this. Now this is really interesting because well,
let let's let's talk about this in in
the same context of what's going on.
Because, you know, just because somebody was attacked,
does not change my opinion of the dynamic.
And like let's be clear about this, nobody
should be a shot in regard to, you
know, just a random person taking action and
in something like this,
but it also...
Was somebody being shot,
what that shows me
in a Trump, you know, Biden dynamic is
that the... This is the radical rationalization of
the average person in regard to the way
they received this. So in their mind, Trump
was probably the biggest bogey man of all
time, which is ridiculous. I quite frankly see
all of these presidents as equally criminal and
equally alarming and dangerous.
Yeah. So somebody saying the... Oh, so thank
you Somebody sent this in in locals. Here
we. Let me check this out.
Okay. Here's a better video he's saying. Me
grab this and look.
This is interesting though, guys. I mean, this
is this is don't no matter what the
context.
No matter what the reasoning. This is going
to affect the election. And I guarantee it's
gonna drive people to support Donald Trump. And
maybe it should. If you think this is
the the person that is you know, being
persecuted for being the truth teller, you know,
which Again, I just don't believe regardless of
what's happening here.
No. That's
that's the wrong 1. Hold on.
Here it is.
And then the worst president in the history
of our country took over and look what
happened to our country
probably 20000000 people.
And, you know, that's a little bit old
that chart that charts a couple of months
old and if you wanna really see something
that said, take a look at what happened
over.
Oh, wow.
So he he clearly
grabbed his neck.
Who is there. Hold on hold. Are you
ready? On you. Ready move.
Move.
Ready
Oh
0 okay. We are watching live at a
rally in Butler Pennsylvania where former president Trump
was speaking on the state.
Well, let's look for some quick coverage real
quick. Now, you know, let... Actually, let me
before we go any further. Let me just
say a couple of things
because I think this is important. Now, you
know, and I guarantee some of which I
might say right now, it's only in any
event, no matter what is happening.
The in the midst of it happening,
emotions are always the primary...
That's what most people lean into.
Which is usually why it's difficult to get
any truth around the perceptions in in the
midst of something like this happening. But let's
be very... Let's be very objective right now
about
a lot of different things around this happening.
1 it it's it's... I mean... My my...
It's just as likely as anything else that
this is some random person that decided to
attack trump. I mean, that's
highly likely. Right? In a lot of context
because of how radical lies the average person
is, especially those and the 2 party illusion
part of the the left of the 2
party illusion,
to believe that he is the biggest villain
and alive that he is the living embodiment
of white supremacy and nazis and all these
nonsensical things they're laying in his feet. While
all of our government are leaning in and
supporting a lot of these things in the
world today, not just 1 side or the
other, but Trump does not embody all of
these things based on his actions and so
on. So my point would be that people
would be driven to take action against somebody
like they would against Biden from the right
because they believe that this person is
everything they were told that they were... That
the that he is or they were.
Now, that's 1 obvious possibility that this was
just a random act that somebody took. Now
Also, we should ask ourselves whether something else
might be happening. Just like
everybody supporting Donald on Trump, what would be
the first to say about any other event.
Is it possible this was fate? Is it
possible? This was a set up event? Is
it possible that somebody did this in the
intention to drive sports donald trump? I don't
know. Those are all possibilities.
My point and the first thing I said
is that even floating those
is gonna make people very angry.
Even though we all know well that any
1 of those things could be possible. Now
another possible alternative,
the conversation of something like a, you know,
a Jfk
assassination conversation where we know there's a lot
of moving parts and different dynamics that could
be driving something like this. Now based on
where we currently are, I'm not really gonna
speculate anymore only because we just really don't
have any more details. And I think that's
the that's the, you know,
responsible thing to do in this in this
situation. But I just wanna to float it
out there first as we'll probably talk about
tomorrow
or, you know, whatever... Actually, I don't think
we'll be begin to show it tomorrow, but
soon enough or maybe I will because of
this.
But we have to be careful and objective
and recognize recognized that a lot of things
are possible. And right now in every context,
any conversation with the 2 party illusion, people
are gonna grab the microphone and try to
set the narrative the way they see it.
But as we're standing right now, clearly, it
looks like he was shot. Clearly,
he is being taken off the stage, and
I I feel like we can see blood
on his face. So it appears to me
that this is something that happened. Based unless
there's something larger that was being done around
this that we didn't see. So if you
have anything else right now that you guys
think I should touch on.
I'm just reading the chat. Send it to
me right now. Otherwise, we're gonna move on
everything else. And Maybe take... I'm a take
1 quick look
and see if there's anything
in regard to just corporate media and see
what they're saying about it.
As as always, we should be
doubting everything coming out of corporate media,
But at the same time, it's important to
kinda see what narratives are trying to set.
So
let me see if you guys can see
this. Here we. I'll put this up for
you.
The wrong page. Hold on.
Okay. So gunshots reportedly fired at Donald Trump
Rally.
Okay. Let's see. Gunshots support have been fired
with former president rushed off the stage my
security staff, Trump appeared to fall to the
ground as he was giving speech. He was
quickly surrounded.
And then he rose to his feet and
put his fist in the air.
That's it. Yeah. Just real basic. You know,
it's strange to me that they wouldn't... You
know, I mean, I can clearly see that
there's some blood on his face what appears
to be.
You can hear the shots fired. It's kinda
interesting reporting coming from from Sky news. So...
Yeah. So here... It's a... Yeah, Not reportedly.
Yeah, look... So you see it right there.
He's definitely got blood on this space. I
mean, it that's what it appears to be
to me.
Shots fired to Donald Trump Rally in Pennsylvania
as former president is seen with blood across
his face. There you go. See, that's mean,
I think Daily Mail is 1 of the
platforms out there, but at least they're willing
to acknowledge the obvious as opposed to trying
to be... I don't know downplay play. Appeared
to be shot in the ear as shots
were fired former president, he didn't seem to
kind of reach for the side of his
face,
grabbed side of his face and blood spatter
across his cheek. Several pops sounds were heard.
Let me know. What do you guys think
about the sound of those shots by the
way. Let me know in the chat. I'm
not I'm not an expert in any means
when it comes to, like, the
sounds of gunshots and so on, but they
sounded a little small to me if I'm
just kinda my purse instinct, that it sounded
like a smaller caliber
former president quickly pumped a fist in the
crowd.
This is developing story. Yeah. So that's pretty
much what we're gonna get right now.
In Pennsylvania where this just took place, Butler,
Frantic scenes took hold the shots rang out,
no information. So 1 last thing, it looks
like my
brother sent me this. Yeah. I don't think
he's watching the show. Just sent this saying
this just happened.
Yeah. See.
Alright. Well, if anything else pops up, guys
that's, you know, monumental
in this conversation other than just that it
happened and so on. Let me know if
somebody to get my attention, and we'll talk
about it. I'll jump over and talk about
it This. Yeah, this this is no matter
what you think about Trump. It's an important
event. I mean, this this is gonna be
recorded in history as another at the very
least former president or president
to put to be.
Being shot at. I mean, every 1 of
these in history has been kind of
not and is regarded, you, like, whether it's
a former president or president. So it's it's
a big deal.
Yeah. Saying there were 4 or 5 shots,
shots were quite muffled
interesting. Anyway, so let... Let's let's continue into
this. Now keeping this in mind, by the
way,
the the conversation. I mean, let's just let's
just take for sake of conversation that this
was exactly what it look like, which... What
it appears to be.
How does this affect everything?
How does how does the...
What I would argue is the clear front
runner in this conversation getting shot at? How
does... What does that change?
My first instinct is this is going to
drive people to support him
because they're... Like, I... There's multiple categories and
how this all works in my opinion within
the 2 party illusion largely, You got the
left side of this that are not gonna
vote for them no matter what. You know,
again, remembering your... I don't think your vote
translates at all for that. So you guys
remember that.
That's clear. Then you've got the people in
the right same way that are gonna go
for no matter what. Then I argue there's
a lot in the middle of varying degrees,
and I think that that's the group would
be swayed. People that might be kind of,
like, well, I don't like either side or
maybe I like, both they're go whatever it
is. That I'm dealing with different situations.
Different top political talking points, different web issues
and suddenly, this happens. They go, okay. That
kind of sway you into thinking he is
the person that is fighting to free everybody,
fighting for the truth because clearly someone's trying
to take them out. That would be something
that would make sense even if it is
a genuine event. So I'm gonna go ahead
and argue that predict rather that this is
going to drive more support to donald Trump.
That's what it seems to be the most
likely conclusion we're seeing here.
And A guarantee he's gonna use this to
drive more support during the selection, which anybody
would. May may, you know, you're the persecuted
hero in this scenario. But again,
remember, from my perspective,
I don't think any of these people deserve
your respect or deserve your trust or deserve
your reverence, whether they're shot at or not.
I think all of them have proven themselves
to be criminals
to be,
you know, people that could couldn't could not
care less about your interests.
It's always about what can serve the interest
of the government, the interest of the empire
and immediately the interest of their Hub.
And I think that's clear. As always, I
hope I'm wrong. I hope I'm wrong about
Trump. I hope Wrong about R junior, I
hope that everything I say is wrong in
the sense that the people you think they
are is exactly who they are. I really
do.
So
let me make sure I I save these
Here we go.
Oh, that one's at the end. We'll come
back to it then. Let me just save
these real quick so we can include them
in the show notes. So you guys can
read more into it. Daily mail usually updates
their stories on the same link. Make sure
you can check that out as well.
Okay. So as I said, make sure you
let me know. I will I will stop
and come back to this if something else
happens. So I wanted to start on on
the regular... What we had lined up today.
Charm was reading the chat again. So III
wanted to start in general on
center. Because we're gonna talk about Twitter and
Ga and this very interesting overlap that...
You know, as I'm just trying to think
of how this might affect that in general.
But so here we have interesting site that
somebody sent me That has to do a
censorship around T lab, it's the website.
Now, we've... A lot of people have been
reaching out. I've been sharing it, showing the
website being down
And, you know, it's just... It's inconsistent. Some
people in the same area and say well
I can see it and so on. But
I just wanted to highlight this because they
sent me this called geo dot com. I
really appreciate them reaching out.
And what it showed,
what it showed
is that there's specific locations that just... It
it just is not working, and has specific
locations that it is. I mean, this is,
like, within the United States, for example, in
California. It just doesn't load at all. Brazil,
Singapore
unable to load. Virginia, Australia Ireland, it seems
they load and sometimes in different varying degrees
and what will fully load. I just think
that's really interesting because I think this shows
you sort of a selective blacklist blocking of
of what we are what we do. So
keep that in mind that I think that
this is not some kind of glitch y
situation. I think that tea lab... Oh, and
on... And by the way, which I wasn't
gonna get into, but I wanna shout out
because it relates to this.
I am gonna be following up, like, I
I... You know, I wouldn't...
I will continue to follow up in regard
to what's going on with the lawsuits.
It's it's not going away. And just... The...
Somebody reached out to me and said, like,
basically suggest that this whole thing doesn't even
seem to be. Despite the fact that you
can look up the websites on or the
lawsuits online that almost it's not happening. Because
and my point is that I don't wanna
talk about this every day. I don't want
this to be the focal point. I frankly
hate making ourselves the focal point of the
news because we're not. In my opinion, there's
a hell of a lot more important things
going on than our suppression our attacks. But
it obviously, it's important because we can't do
this if we ultimately get taken down.
But I just hate having to bring it
up. There's stuff that happens every day, but
I don't like to constantly put it in
front of you guys because I don't think
we're the most important thing going on. That
being said, there is now a fourth lawsuit.
Also coming from the Hi b and and
associates group. So now we've got 2 lawsuits
from
Sanders and Sanders group, and then we've got
2 lawsuits from Hi b and associates I
think.
Both different lawsuits from different people on each
side.
How in the world that's even I mean,
think about how unlikely it would be for
1 of them. To have 2 separate
clients that come to them and say, I'd
like to sue this guy from different parts
of the country within months.
It just... It's... I'm impossible in my opinion,
especially for 2 of them. So either my
point again. Now for both sides, either somebody's
putting them to this hiring these law these
law firms to go after me directing them
where to go or the law firms themselves
are coming after. It just... There's no way
around it. All of them in my opinion
and I'm not saying this has to prove
anything in this direction. It's just clearly the
reality. All of these grew,
articles that are being focused on our old
related to israel in some way. And that
1 group is literally based out of Jerusalem.
I I I'm all of this seem to
become crazy,
obvious right after October seventh, and My work
that's been focusing on this. That's not to
say that I can say that's prove what's
happening. But nonetheless,
it is clear that we're being attacked. And
it's not going away. And I... We're just
talking about this today. I, I just don't
know I mean, for those that haven't seen
the show, the bottom line is I can't
afford to pay my lawyer to fight this,
which is gonna be 50 grand plus easy
in a a trial, which is what they're
forcing me into
So I can't afford that. A a try...
A case that I know I could win
because they have to prove that I didn't
knowing did so in and and I... It's
not the case. I can prove that I
didn't. In regard to copyright.
And so I can't fight it, which means
they're demanding a large sum so this 1
group assessed for a hundred and 50000 dollars.
It's not a joke.
So I'm stuck. I can't pay 50. I
was a can't pay a hundred and 50000,
so they're gonna demand it. I have either
give them something in the middle, which I
also don't wanna do because that means they
basically store me for money.
So at this point, I'm wondering if I
should just ignore it all and just see
what happens. But quite frankly, I... Just that's
just... I'm lost it. Anyway I mean to
go into all that, but it's... It weighs
on me every single day.
Now on that note, I think this has
something to do with that in a sense
shape around the world. I also wanna to
point this out, I thought it's a strange.
Not this is necessarily related, but on truth
social, Let me know if you guys are
seeing this or not. Is true social down,
are you guys able to post on the
platform because all day today, I'm getting this
very... I'm not... This is just grayed out.
I try to post this for the podcast
today show. And it it shows up as
the button where you can push it. I
hit. Nothing happens. So I go to the
website itself, and I'm like, oh, weird. Nothing's
going on. I can't post
compose
post it. Nothing happens.
That doesn't show up. I was able to
post a link through my my phone
but I had to literally type it out
and you could even see what was being
typed and I just post a link tried,
like, 3 times after actually get hit accurate.
I don't know. Maybe true social having problems.
I don't know. But I find it interesting.
I'm worried that's a... It is a partisan
of platform. Maybe they're censoring me. Wouldn't surprise
me at all.
But let me know. I'd like to know
if they're down or not, so I can
know if I should keep trying to use
them. Now,
Robert put up an excellent article today. Israel's
plans for a post war gaza revealed that
Hamas isn't the issue.
And this is this is an important article
because he's highlighting a lot of different things.
The main 1 being
that they're in their they're laid out plans
that have not deviate from the very beginning
of this will post October 7
prove that it's not... Their narratives or lies,
prove that what they're to accomplish is nothing
that Biden claiming they're trying to accomplish or
Trump would, if he was there. You know
that.
All it really lights is that this is
a massive illusion. It's destruction that's at the
cleansing. No way around it. And 1 thing
I like that he the the line that
I shared with the article today
As Robert wrote this and aren't kinda para
phrase that Tel aviv will not even entertain
the idea of granting the Palestinian people their
basic rights.
Self determination. They they're they at this point,
they're saying it's not happening no matter what,
which has always been the case. They've just
been lying about it, and that's p. Benny
says, Netanyahu who's ruling coalition.
So the religious science is a party, the
Jewish power party, Ben give smoke which these
guys.
He says that coalition is so radical.
That the that Netanyahu himself would not be
able to agree to a reasonable deal without
his government falling apart. So and this is
an easily to identifiable fact is israeli media
is pointing this out. So that what that
shows you is that Israel or rather Netanyahu
is not even able He's bound by his
extremist party that put him in power because
he's trying to maintain and pair power not
go to prison, which is what he would
be doing if he had enough
manipulated his way back into power, and that's...
That is also reported by Israeli media, multiple
indictment.
So we did this.
You know,
metaphorically signing a deal with to devil and
essentially with the most extreme people. And now
he's in a position where he cannot
even agree to a deal or ceasefire that
everybody's driving in the do, because even if
even if he wanted to, because they would
then dismantle the government, he would lose power,
he would go to jail.
And, yet, we're all acting, like, they're actually
gonna have a deal. We'll talk about that
a bit today. If we have time. Very
great a very important article. Make sure you
check this out. Now we'll come back to
that in general.
I'd like to start
today in a general sense with the discussion
of
Twitter
media censorship. And really a quick point about
both Trump and Biden the to the 2
party illusion. Now, Fox, really, this 1 is
more so about the idea that as the
election begins to increase
the focal point of it, you know, really,
it's it's... There's about a month period after
the last election where there's no focus, then
the rest of those 4 years are focused
on the election Let's be honest.
Fox News reporting, Russia, interfering with 20 24
election to help Trump. We already showed you
that actually.
Us... You intelligent officials say. My point in
this is to laugh about how dumb it
is that yet again, because I guess they
I just can't,
I guess they're lazy. They can't think of
new things to do.
Making these arguments. So also Iran. It happens
every single election mind you. At least just
for the last stone I can see every
time. What do they do? Russia, Iran, China,
whoever they wanna point that. They're interfering somehow
with no evidence to really back it up.
Apparently, Russia's is doing it again now even
though the real evidence was presented to prove
that did happen last time.
Embassy of israel to the United States of
course, as Us intelligence confirms, the iranian regime
is s to flames in an attempt to
divide a very public.
And, you know, really, what they're pointing at
is the protest, which were pro not what
they claimed they were
so many lies were... But this is really
just going on. It's now trying to divide
the country. Yeah. Too late. It was divided
before they got here because of you, government.
But this is ridiculous and of course, to
drive and encourage anti israel sentiment. Again, Israel's
doing that well enough on their own, rather
the zion aspect of it.
But my point is here we are again,
Iran and Russia and everybody yelling, it's just
all narrative bombs, and we just get to
overwhelm with this game that everybody in the
way, and everyone gets distracted that might be
even people that can see through it. The
point is this is a false narrative. It's
a false, it's an illusion.
We step into this where they're acting like
everything's going wrong. Trump's gonna cheat. They're gonna
cheat, then Trump says they're gonna cheat. The
point is nothing means anything. So what are
they end up doing?
Driving you to rely on whatever they claim.
It's all narrative because everything else is so
confusing and so muddled.
And that's what they hope. They want that
from you.
Bailey highlights this in regard the claim, the
White House said this too as well. Iran
is funding and bold these protests.
Kinda late there guys. It's already been really
clearly showing that's not what's happening, but here's
what Vanessa says,
how many decades
has the Cia and Mi 6 funded armed
insurgents, you know, terrorists to overthrow governments in
anti c colonial with source sovereign nations.
Iran has been hardest hit by the Uk
Us funded media and human rights activists based
in the Us who mega Cia talking points
and welcome crippling sanctions on the iranian people.
But, yes, it's iran doing it too. I
mean, which by the way, I'll always point
out that I think all these countries. In
some ways, are all doing the same things.
Try to take advantage of what they can
where they can.
But
first of all, if the White House said
had any evidence to back this up, it
would be dumped everywhere in front of you
all the time,
But her point is simply that the Us
government is simply projecting what they do everywhere
all the time more than anybody else you
can see, maybe Saf for israel.
Team Anderson highlights, and this is coming from
a,
what is it? And what is that again?
Mu news agency,
saying or
Us directly involved in a displacement of 40000000
people over the context
the process or the what's the word for?
The time frame of their world war on
terror
or of terror. And it's not... It's easy
to point out. People who've made the same
points about how many they killed.
Really compare this to the conversations of what
means what in the world. Well, if we're
pretending this many number over here being killed
means genocide, then what does this mean? Not
at this place, but the people they've killed
in their war of terror.
Washington's military, Tim Anderson rights and and military
interventions had displaced oh this quote from the
article
displaced 40000000
people in 85
countries.
Make sure you really grasp what that saying.
The Us government and their illegal military bench
interventions in most every country they've been involved
with have displaced 40000000
people in 85
combined countries.
Us operations are, quote, the main viola of
human rights in the international community. Yet. Now,
let's say you just reflex push back from
that. Well, recognize or at least ask yourself
if you think that's false? Why is it
that is it Israel is committing some of
the most egregious and obvious blatant human rights
violations. We ever seen being broadcast live on
Tv and in the United States just plug
in tears and stop and feet and say,
well, we don't see anything.
Clearly,
they... If they care about these things, they
only care about them in so insofar as
they can use them to benefit themselves.
Ib highlight this about Biden. I just wanna
make a point about the larger context.
The intercept writes Biden is selling weapons to
the majority of the world's auto.
And he writes... And I agree with him.
This is the guy you called a lesser
evil,
get f.
But my point is, it's no different with
Trump. It's no different with obama or bush
or anybody else. They've all done the same
thing.
And they do and we'll continue to. That's
what they do. At may's point for years.
If you've been watching the show for a
long time, you've bring this up during Trump,
I brought up during Obama, which is
III always I wish I remember. I always
forget the name of the group.
This was a passing point. I forgot to
grab it. But the point is and I
I should do a deeper dive on this
again. I've done it twice already. But this
group, I forget the name of it off
top of my head, is the group that
essentially
categorize
what in catalogs, what governments are doing what
and the kind of, like, hierarchy of whether
they're selling weapons or working with the the
high risk states they call them, or entities.
You know, the... And they're the criteria interior,
the ones that are more likely to committing
human rights, violations,
occupations,
kill civilians, that kind of stuff. And, this
is no joke. It's... This is a
overlap the Us government thing, and they highlight
the Us government as 1... The leading or
if not 1 of the leading groups in
the world that arm
and support the most dangerous high risk countries.
Of course, there's always a narrative around it.
There's just the group fighting against the really
bad ones or blah blah blah, but it
doesn't... It's consistently the same.
So he's a lesser of evil in this
context. He's just the evil, like they all
are because they all do the same thing.
They all arm the Saudi Arabia and the
moderate rebels and the Israeli, all of them.
That's clear.
Now,
we just had a really great conversation on
our last... We... Yeah just yesterday, we had
our episode 24 of Pirate stream. Which by
the way, let me know what you think
about the
you know, everything. The background, the lighting. So
I'm still kind toy with it. I'm... I'm
definitely gonna be getting a new table. I...
That's just what I found that I had
already that was kind of a cool rustic
table, but we're gonna be doing,
here you guys can actually see it. We're
gonna... I'm gonna be finding a a different
set up, Or, you can't really see it
in the shot I guess, because that's in
the way. But
I wanted something that is
picking up for more people and so on,
but let me know what you think about
that in general. Good to get back. We
had a great conversation. And it actually got
in... We got into a really interesting conversation.
I decided to put off something even from
today as well that is around
bit bacteria and the Covid 19 shots, and
I'm definitely gonna talk about it, it's interesting,
But it's really just like, an additional point
about how it's destroying our immune systems.
And really ties into pretty much vaccination, which
is important, and I will talk about it.
But we... I put it off because we
had this really interesting conversation that that kind
of
consume the whole show in a good way.
I was really enjoying it. About the idea
of the 2 party illusion, the the the
whole, like, dialect of it all, like, the
the the Galen dialect that we focused on
the concept of, you know, using the 2
party illusion, and it's something I've was just
was recently talking about to on a wake
up in fact, to kind of, like, bring
in different parts of the agenda, but both
of them together achieve something for the larger
entity, and they use our emotions and what
we care about to drive us into it.
It was an a fascinating conversation. Again, she
is so well acknowledged on on these deeper
philosophical esoteric conversation that it's it's powerful. I
Hope you to check it out. 1 of
the things that really came up around this,
we talk about the sa act, digital ids
and how they're using this to manipulate people
within the Paragon. In this point, I highlight
as you just heard me talk about their
Republicans.
In the context of
the Save act. And I'll you grab that
for you so you can check it out.
And what this is about is the fact
that inside the act, which again, I'm hoping
I've made it clear more than once.
That's strange.
Oh, it's loading still.
That I made... I hope I made clear
that the point is that I agree with
the general premise of
or really just put it clearly that I
think is important to to
ensure that only citizens are voting. And and
if you think that's not the way it
should be, then we should have a fair
conversation about that. I'm not gonna be an
absurd person and call you a traitor for
simply have a different opinion about something, but
which Elon musk get about this conversation.
But IIIII
don't know anybody would disagree with it. It's
a law. It's currently the law and not
that you should not not all laws are
a constitution. This 1 appears to be and
the point being that we should care if
people might be abusing that. But my point
is within the act itself, it's very clear
real Id act compliant
identification and that's about general Ids, rather the
Id 20 20, part of it. Program is,
and that's a part of it. And I
made it's very clear. So we get see,
It's actually didn't load. What is going on
with that?
Gosh so much weird steph going on my
end.
And this conversation is important because I think
republicans are being manipulated into supporting something that
they otherwise and really we're the in the
2 party illusion we're the most to push
back on the idea of digital Ids. Now
you've got them in my opinion supporting this,
not knowing that's what's happening. And now you've
got both sides driving digital Ids
when people that are outside the paradigm would
seem to see it.
But on that note,
in the same way, we just mentioned this
briefly, I thought this was so interesting.
But this is at Twitter. On July first,
as you guys all have likely seen, but
weirdly
And trust... If to... If there's anybody else
talking about this, please send it to me.
III was really trying to find anybody going
other than people in the comments,
So going wait a minute. Why is why
is
Elon Musk was talking about suing the the
group... The the Eu
conversation, pointing to
Ben shapiro
talking about ga
in congress as a problem we have to
fight while
on July first, which was a week before
this or more had already reassigned their partnership
with Ga.
Let's not play this dumb game where we
act like he somehow is not aware of
that.
Everybody's been tweeting about it talking about it
He's... I I've looked. He's not talking about
Ga at all. This has been put in
front of him since the first. He's not
talking about it. Now, it's certainly possible, that
just doesn't see it. Always... There... I have
being objective that is a possibility. But I
think it's really naive to think Y did
this and he didn't see it. So explain
for me how in the world,
they can be partnered again with ga and
people have argued maybe it never she went
away. And here he is pointing at ga
really kind of, like, through the... The larger
conversation in Shapiro pointing at problem and what
they're talking about is
ga.
And everyone's going, yeah. Elon saving us from
the censorship line this make sense to me.
So please, I'm missing something. Please let me
know. Now there's a Twitter posted on their
safety part of the the of Twitter posted
on July first. We are cited to announce
that x has reinstated it's our
relationship, their partnership with the W mfa marketers,
and this is a aspect of the whole
thing, and this is what it says down
here as well. This... And if you look
on the website of this group,
Ga is is 1 of these central aspects
of it, and which is the global alliance
for responsible media. That's ga. And it says
as of today, x is included in a
member is a as a member of Ga.
It's right there.
This is the world economic. This is what
they call their flagship program.
It says is committed to the safety of
our global towns square.
It's just... That's that's the language that coming
directly from the people that they're all calling
out and all claiming, they're only sensory conservatives.
Well, isn't this supposed to be like the
conservative behavior at this point it make sense.
I feel like I'm missing something or it's
weird how many people are ignoring this?
And trust me, a lot of people are
talking about it. I'm talking about the central
players all this. Now monetization coach, I like
this and says, we're just pointing out 1
of the same problems.
He says if I decide to
advertise on Twitter right now,
that... Will I need to comply with their
at ad net 0 carbon emissions guidelines,
Well, that's what that means. Garmin ad net
0 announced global framework to measure media carbon
emissions. The point that this whole partnership is
that they influence and in if not regulate
What we're talking about. Drive them to sensor.
That's what the whole media... Oh, the whole
presentation for Congress was.
I think it's really interesting.
Here is the website for world economic 4...
World economic forum,
global alliance for responsible media,
ga.
With nearly 3800000000.0
people online, the world is increasingly connected and
yet the increase in dangerous hateful disruptive and
content online risk threatening our global community.
It focuses on addressing the following challenges. Hate
speech, which is
protect order free speech.
Now Bullying
is an interesting point by the way that
we should discuss in the context of what
absolute free speech, I mean,
But, I mean, I have AIA,
you know, sensitive spot when it comes to
that for people that I've seen experience that.
So personally, I think bullying is obviously a
very big problem.
But I do think that there's a line
there when it becomes clearly
harassment.
Right? Or they're not even clip very early
and everything. The moment you're getting the point
is that that is a lot. But, I...
I'm not... I'm not I'm trying to say
that I support this I would allow. My
point is that it's an interesting
conversation to really push the boundaries of what
absolute free speech may mean. But again, my
point is that that that that 1 would
apply in regard to law. So you don't
need this group, sticking their fingers in and
saying that if it's a law can be
That's what Elon pretends is the boundary of
the barrier, but it's not
disinformation. Okay. Same thing. That's protected under free
speech. And I mean, like, will fully doing
so by the way. That is allowable in
the context of free speech.
But most people they point out are people
that are spreading information that is actually easily
proven to be true. They just don't like
it.
Use of personal data, which by the way,
would be a crime if you're do somebody,
child exploitation also a crime. So these ones
I think are the vehicles they use to
manipulate people into allowing them to censor things
that are allowed free speech
or
not allowed, but respected,
honored free speech.
Now here's what's interesting.
This is
the symbolism.
So this is
ga
is the... As they right here, the terrifying
hound of He in Norse Legends,
which essentially is hell. It's not the exact
same thing.
But they're they're both the realms of the
dead where souls of the deceased reside as
it says, both are often associated with darkness,
cold, des relations. So it's a different, you
know, theology or I whatever even call it,
But it's kind of... It's... And of it's...
It's even spelled H e. Right? So in
Christianity, which it says here. It's not the
same.
Although bullshit similarities,
I believe that's where it takes some of
its meaning.
Either way, it's really interesting for that to
be you know, ga is like the, like
the hell hound, essentially. Find that really fascinating,
alarming.
Now here's what Elon musk just said, all,
the twelfth. So mind you, on the first,
Twitter
rein initiated their partnership with Ga.
I guarantee he knows that by now. Here's
what he says with Bill Maher.
We really can't emphasize this enough. We must
we must protect free speech,
and free speech only matters. It's only relevant
when it's someone you don't like saying something
more like because, obviously, the speech that you
like is yeah. You know, that's easy. The
thing about Censorship is that sure for for
those who had advocate it, just remember, at
some point, that will return on you.
Gee, that sounds like something we always talk
about.
Too bad that's not real.
Now, look, it doesn't matter what you think
about him and what he's trying to do,
what he just said there is simply not
the reality.
It's a it's a... And this is what's
so frustrating to me is it is a
verifiable fact that there is still a
blatant censorship and very clear suppression. Now, I
I will clearly argue that it's not as
at least prominent and... I'm up upfront as
it was in the past regime as if
that's even gone,
I just think it's in a very different
phase right now. The point nonetheless is how...
Whatever the degree, it's clearly happening. People being
sent... I mean, even, like, Lucas Cage is
a good example. He was brought back.
But not over the... Not all of them
are, but either way, that is still a
direct example of people sent being censored for
things that actually do not
break a law as Elon argued.
And in no way or even... You you
could you could even argue they're not a
violation of their terms of service.
There there was no threats of violence that
he was talking about Ism.
As in marxism, communism, zion. That's what he
was talking about. And it's very clear. But
clearly, they take that as racism because they
con inflate judaism and Zion.
Look, it doesn't matter whether you agree with
what he's saying that's at the point. If
the obvious reality that they're being peep... It's
just a different direction of the narrative right
now. Or whatever they're choosing to argue is
the off limits topic.
That's not free speech. It's as simple as
that. And I said, what a joke?
It's just so sad. How many choose to
fall for this overt lie, while people are
un questioning being suppressed and censored on this
platform not for breaking the law as he
famously once said was the bar
or breaking the terms of service, but for
just uncomfortable truth.
I mean, I've seen things still even around
Covid 19. And mean we, it's people... There's
a huge part of this conversation that doesn't
want to engage with this.
And maybe it's because they're making money on
this platform. Maybe, I mean, who knows. But
somebody I think is a lot more rep
pictures than we realize.
And this is where
I don't know what that I don't even
pronounce that, but this is an account that
shared this with me. Thank you for that.
And it's an interesting discussion. So I wanted
to go through them. I might not play
all 3 of them. About 10 plus minutes
of of back and forth,
but Charlie Kirk is talking with Mike Bands.
And this what's so interesting to me is
that this conversation is explicitly about this topic.
It's being had in the last couple of
days,
not a mention of Twitter,
the group, they're praising as the savior in
this conversation,
realign with arm even though what they're talking
about is ga?
Now explain that for me. How is it
even possible? Do you think it's possible that
neither of them are aware of that point
even though there's people pointing it out underneath
their tweets. I hide I find that really
hard to believe it's certainly possible.
So then the question is if you do
think they know about that, why would they
leave that out?
I think it's obvious quite frankly, but I'm
you come to your own conclusions about it.
Why would they omit the fact that the
Twitter Elon Musk's save your platform
is working with the group. They're arguing is
the biggest threat to our free speech.
I mean, that's really interesting to me.
Here's the conversation. Let's play this these, and
I'm gonna stop at plenty anytime. Because I've
got a lot of points. I mean, quite
frankly, most of what Mike pence talks about
I agree with, and I support. And I
I think what he's doing is highlighting some
very important problems, but, of course, it seems
to me to come from a really overt
2 party prayer, 2 party illusion perspective. As
if everything republican is always good and just,
and everything on the Democrat side is what's
trying to suppress our freedom in our human
future, you know, it's just not the reality.
You can prove that. That's my point. You
can literally prove this Maybe you can argue
it's more pronounced on 1 side, but you
just can't keep pretending that just because they
have an r by their name that they're
fighting for free speech. Or that because
Ga is seemingly going after conservatives that that's
the the only problem is the left paradigm
and clearing a while Twitter is working with
them.
Now is Mike Benz. Mike Benz is terrific,
out the for a foundation for freedom online.
Mike, I wanna dive into welcome program. I
wanna dive into some of the breaking news
here out of the house judiciary committee walk
us through it.
Well, it's amazing. So there is an an
institution known as the global advertisers for responsible
media.
Known as Ga, GARN.
And this
institution is in charge of 2600000000.0
dollars billion with a b, in annual programmatic
ad spending on independent news sites. And Ga
has been weaponized as a way to destroy
conservative and independent leaning
media
institutions as part of this long range plan
of the blob class in order to kill
alternative news,
because alternative news was fueling alternative political candidates
like Donald Trump in Nigel Par barrage and
Marine Penn. And so, basically, Nato embarked on
this nato wide project to try to kill
alternative try kill out ties revenue to independent
news, so there'd be no opposition to mainstream
media.
And so, Ga,
is this flagship product of the world economic
forum. We're essentially the corporate and financial investors,
all of our our blue chip companies,
who very much depend on the Us government
for in a favors for favors relationship with
their global markets, as well as on European
governments. And they have had this revolving door
relation ship where since 20 17,
the advertisers have been pressured by nato countries
to kill alternative news. And Ga has done
so happily because these populous groups
who do believe in in economic nationalism and
what's best for their own people are now
at Logger heads with these Blue chip companies
who basically wanna turn countries into economic suns.
But again, see, it's not just populous nationalist,
Republican, you know, conservative
concepts countries platforms. It's not the case.
Clearly, we can all see that ga and
the rest of these things have been weaponized
recognized to take out
unpopular, uncomfortable inconvenient information.
People like us are being censored. I'm not
a republican. I'm not leaning in any of
these directions. And I know a lot of
people are in the same field. So at
the very least, you can argue that it's
people that are not politically associated or Republican.
Right? It wouldn't be just but I also
know people that are Democrats that have been
censored for the same things. Talking about the
truth during the Covid 19 conversation, talking about
any number of these things. So I have
a hard time taking it face value when
we're omit that part of the story. And
you'll know there's not... They... And all these...
They're... There's not 1 mention of Twitter working
with Ga.
And so the the revelation here, which again
again, Ga sounds like something that change James
Bomb would be fighting there. They always
they always name their stuff,
so so so interestingly.
That in the house judiciary report,
it shows how the biggest brands seek to
control online speech? The new information reveals that
the advertisers and brands are concluding together. So
how is it exactly this work in practice?
Well, this works through what are known as
ad exchanges.
You see, every
website on the Internet that that has ads,
they're there at... There's 2 ways that you
can make ad revenue. 1 is a individual
sponsored deal with a particular company. But that's
far less revenue and and far more sort
of custom tailored. What most websites do or
at least what was all... What was said
actually almost all of online advertising, which is
how you monetize eyeballs. This is how Facebook
began to turn a profit. This is how
every new site turns a profit is through
advertising. The the way it works is if
you don't have a particular sponsor deal with
an individual brand, You use what's called programmatic
advertising, which is, you know all those cookies
that are collected all of your data and
metadata that are swallowed up, using Spider crawl
essentially all over the Internet. So every, you
know, Gmail, for example, scans at older email
for... What do you think Twitter's twitter is
doing, guys? Words, and then pictures that essentially
gives that to advertisers so that they get
so Google can customize the ads. And that
ad targeting is all done through ad changes
who swallow up all this data, and then
in a micro second, tailor the ad that's
most likely for you to
to purchase the good in combination with how
much these advertisers have bid on specific keywords
in order to deliver you that ad. And
so you as an independent website. You as,
you know,
Charlie Kirk show, u
independent.
That's cute. As b bar dot com or
0AN,
you
you don't really have control if you're using
this these programmatic ad exchanges on what add
is served. That's all done by the exchanges.
So there's 2 kinds of exchanges. There's... I
don't know why any of these platforms has
even be doing that. Why would you be
leaning into a controlled ad platform? Because I
mean, this is the problem is that they're
all kind of tac let... They're a lot...
They know that your information being scooped through
their through that ad being done on your
show. Or, you know, monetary.
This is a kind of problematic overlap that
they act, like they're fighting this in a
lot of ways. Like, look, I, you know
my opinion. You know, all those platforms they've
listed are very
very clearly right leaning that very clearly omit
very important things if it challenges republican narratives.
I've proven that to you many times. Alternatively,
they have things they point out that I
think are important or true. But that's that's
even corporate media sometimes. Right? The point is
that that is not an honest depiction of
I think what these groups are actually doing.
The demand side exchange and the supply side
exchange. Essentially, these 2 sides of of the
ad exchanges
talk to each other, but these... But it
all goes up to these supply side ad
exchanges
who who are essentially the... Have these relationships
with Garmin. They had these relationships with the
brands themselves. The brands have these relationships with
the supply side, add,
added changes. The attic... The supply side feeds
into the demand side, the demand side serves
it to to the to the website. So
if ga
and and the supply side ad exchanges are
c concluding with each other about what
misinformation is. And and ga specifically pledged 2
years ago,
that it would eradicate all 2600000000.0
dollars worth of its annual programmatic ad spend
to website that are designated to be repeat
misinformation spreader. And who determines what a repeat
it misinformation spreader, well, it's the same rigged
censorship ga oil firms, News guard and G,
the global disinformation index, you know, who themselves
have people like general Michael D hayden, you,
head of the Cia, head of the Nsa,
forest star general, motherboard board, Andres Ras and
former head Nato on the Board of Advisors
for News guard. Rick S, the Former head
of the state Department's global engagement Center is
on the Board of News guard,
Tom Ridge, the former head of Dhs. Is...
So, yeah, these apex printers of the National
Security State. Who have you were helping on
stopping Donald Trump from winning elections from stopping
people associated with Brexit or people associated with?
No, is that what they're doing?
Now, again, I wanna be clear. IIII1
of the reason Wanna play this because I
think the information is giving you is important.
I I like what he's doing here. It's
really, very clearly laid out. He clearly knows
he's talking about. I like most of his
work. I just think that this problem
is very clear being present, and maybe it's
just for the Charlie Kirk show. I don't
know, but it's being framed as
going after Republicans going out. I just, you
know, I just think that's...
Well, let's put it this way. That's a
a fraction of the story. Marine Pen or
A in Germany
or
Matteo Sal,
all of which I think are people that
are part of the agenda.
Italy any populous group around the world can
now have their their essentially,
their news engine cut off my man arnold,
Gotta go to 1 our advertisers at our
escaping information, which is what happens. 1 sec.
We are gonna be back and just... So
it's... So far, I think this is fascinating.
Right? And I think what the the interesting
part of this though is that it's...
If we're pretending that these people are only
tailoring us towards 1 side of the paradigm,
How do you explain all the other people
that have continued to be censored for talking
about things that challenge the paradigm itself?
Right? I mean, that's that's I think that's
important to think about. So as they come
back from the break, the start the conversation
continues. Continues with us. So Mike, help me
understand. What is Us Aid
role in this. I know you've been mentioning
this. You have a great tweet on this.
Usa Idea, that's about 4 and aid. What
on Earth are they doing
policing
domestic
advertising.
Aid is the visible side of the
of the Cia
Iceberg. When you see
Aid,
you are always watching either 1 of 3
things happening,
either the Cia
the state department or the Department of Defense.
Usa was created 19 61 to be the
sort. This is important stuff Just gonna completely,
you know, related, but in its own right.
This important. We've talked with a lot. The
Trojan horse of regime change, Us usa Id,
I would say Usa aid. And national endowment
democracy. Listen to what he says about this
important. Sort of centralized,
logistical aid and
financial support to Us foreign policy
operations related to either their national security or
national interest.
National security is going to involve the Pentagon
or the Cia, National interest is going to
involve the state department of the Cia.
And so you had this problem that the
Pentagon, the Cia and the state Department had
from the forties... The sixties, which they were
tripping over each other, funding their own dis
groups, funding their own media
organizations, funding their own
economic ecosystems to support their own endeavors and
we're you know, we're basically inefficient and tripping
over each other and du. And so Usa
that all out. Usa aid actually is a
larger budget than the Cia. But it is,
you know, make no mistake. Usa aid is
not a charity.
Usa is a soft power influence machine, which
provides the monetary muscle for both over to
diplomacy and covered action. And in this case,
it's covered action. And I would tell you.
I was... I've been I've been watching these
people since the day they set all this
up, and I was watching their live streams
in 20 17
when the National endowment for democracy in Us
aid gotten the room together with Google and
Facebook to pressure them to take down ad
networks. I'm gonna give you a great example.
In May 20 17,
there was
there was a guy who was the basically
the head of research for the national Endowment
of democracy.
The national network for democracy was established in
a letter in 19 83
from the Cia director of the Reagan administration,
William Colby, to the attorney general who called
for a restoration of the Cis capacities
to fund media
institutions and political groups that they had lost
during the Carter administration, when when Jimmy Carter
fired 30 percent of the Cia operations director
in 1 night, and to avoid the scandals
of the 19 fifties sixties and seventies,
what William Colby proposed was that instead of
having
instead of having Cia fingerprints on this, we
would create a a private non
organization called the National Endowment for democracy
to do it instead, that way, if an
operation got busted, it wouldn't look like the
Cia did it. Now now the Role guy
who was basically the head of the analytics
division for the National down for democracy.
Got in a room with Michael Cher and
Nature. Earth I forget. All of... All of
them. Left right, middle whatever. All use these
tools.
And now he mentioned Michael Cher, which Whitney
and I've talked about, she's done a lot
of work on this. There's a lot of
central players. 20 17. Michael Cher,
was, of course, with the Us Justice department,
but he was also the brains behind the
disinformation conference board with the with Nina at
Dhs.
He was also the chairman of Freedom House,
which is another 1 of these large state
of department man ngos. And most famously, he
was the chairman of Bae systems. Which is
the largest military contractor in all of Nato.
So this is a 1 of these Apex
predators of the National security state together with
the head of the Cia most prolific
comfort action conduit.
And they cornered the, the executives of Google
and Facebook
for for content
moderation,
in May 20 17,
and demanded that Google and Facebook
changed their policies
to to eliminate the financial incentives for misinformation
and talked about the need to rope in
advertiser networks to kill advertising revenue to all
alternative what they called unfiltered alternative news. Because
unfiltered alternative news was getting rise to populist
movements and populous movements
we're basically undermining nato and threatening to have
this Brexit Brexit
exit Brexit, Domino. And so the whole international
say, I mean, I I think, in general,
I mean, like, there's there's a lot of
good information here, but I feel like I
wanna talk more, a cup point a couple
things again to go back to Trump and
generally, you know, it feel like it's taking
it too long. But I think what
make sure you watch the rest of them.
I think there's good information. The overall point
again, he goes back to the populace and
really kind of talking about the right leaning
entities that that's really what they're aimed at.
I mean, I'd... If you... If we can
actually stand back with all that we know
and pretend that these groups are acting internationally,
against only groups that are on 1 side
of a of of a political standing? I
I mean, how do we even take that
seriously?
It's simply
pro not the case.
They've gone after all sorts of groups on
all sorts of political pain if they are
simply against the agenda, they're not on the
side of what they're doing. Left or right
doesn't matter.
I mean, it and it... It's... I'm not
even... On no way. Am I suggesting this
is meant to be... I don't know. Maybe
this is what they genuinely think. But I
think it's frustrating that that... This is what
the 2 party illusion does. Partisan in politics
are what brake logic in every possible context.
Now let's go back really quickly. We got
a couple things I wanna show that were
sent to me just now. Now first, this
is Mike Vale.
Doesn't say what party it would... Oh, from
a Abc.
He's saying he's claiming
Butler County district attorney is claiming that 1
of the... That a person was shot behind
him. And 1 of the thing people were
saying, I was just kinda quickly looking
And I. Mean, it seems odd that with,
like, what 6 shots that nobody else appears
to be shot? But you, early. So who
knows what, you know, information's flying around. Even
somebody just expressed to me that I know
is very clearly for Trump support that they're
wondering whether this was faked. Always what happens.
And again, always the push back to act
like it's
disrespectful. It's
If you care about the truth, it's never
disrespectful to question what's going on. That's it's
just... It's it's it's from a a
what's the right word for it? You know,
in in a lacking of an emotion position.
Like, you're just simply trying to find the
truth. And, of course, that should matter. We
should all want that.
Now this set... They're they're claiming somebody was
shot behind him. It says Trump was okay,
but no information about the shooter just now.
He says update. District attorney says she believes
the person who died was someone in the
crowd, and then I just could grab this
video, and I I tilted it for you.
So let's take a look.
I can find it.
Hold on. That's strange. Okay. So I'm 9...
Damn near sure. I just saved that. Hold
on.
Oh, there it is. Okay.
In,
and we're not sure exactly where those shots
came from at this point we're trying to
figure it out, but
to hear that and then see the president
fall down there on that stage.
I can't put into words how shocking it
was to the people in the crowd and
to me as you're trying to figure out
if you're okay, what's going on? Was he
shot was he wounded, then we heard him
on the microphone shannon and saying, let me
grab my shoes as they try to take
them off. So we're just to figure out
what happened.
Yeah. You you just can't really see much.
You know? So, I mean, I just... I
really stressed everyone just to be patient and
not jump to conclusions about anything. I mean,
I'm... You're you're gonna find no matter what.
No matter how obvious things are.
Gonna find conversations? And then and this... It's
never as I said wrong to ask?
Could this be what happen? Could that be
what happen? Could that be fake? Could that
be a lie That's... The the the the
establishment is always so desperate to keep you
not doing that because that's what challenges narratives.
And how many times does that happened where
it turns out to be exactly what they
said you're not allowed to say.
But my point is even when it's very
obvious, you'll have people that come out and
don't say we should question what this could
be... They come out and say, this is
what happened. He's actually dead. It's not even
him anymore. Now it's a fake person. Now
that same thing I do with Biden and
him to do with everybody else. Which of
course, it could be.
But be careful because partisan angles of this
will always try to manipulate these things. Some
of which aren't even doing it until like
support trump. Some will just recognize a benefit
in being partisan, and then screen the thing
they want people that gets clicks and shares
and it's always what happens? Always.
Let's see 1 more last thing here.
Showing another video.
For the podcast. So you guys can see
it here.
Yeah. Oh, it's just just. So, you know...
You know, the thing I would point out
though, for those, that might be saying this
is you know, nobody else... Oh wow. Yeah.
So it looks like somebody else is shot.
You know, to be logical, you know, for
people who might be saying it's all stage,
which is, you know, always what you're gonna
find. Is it be pretty damn hard to
to with the, you know, having an live
event and have this happen in front of
people. I mean, think it's pretty clear this
happened. Based on what we're looking at now
based on the preliminary information, I think it's
pretty clear.
So the question then it becomes, you know,
why? What was happening here?
Wait, if they find the person, you know,
we should be questioning whether that was the
person. I mean, it always the... This is
how these things always tend to go. But
ask yourself who benefits from this? That's always
1 way to look at it. Right? I
mean, clearly, I would argue that from an
Israeli perspective, which clearly you know they're capable
of doing stuff like this. We just talk
with or use.
The thing would be...
Would this be something somebody would accomplish in
order to create the the drive for support
for the very person that they want to
be in power. That's certainly something to consider.
But I mean, I've tried had to pick
something. I... Probably seems most likely to me
that somebody just is completely radical by the
corporate media. And I've been convinced that this
guy is gonna end the world. You know,
that that... It's... That makes more sense than
anything. As far like I a tell, but
we should be questioning all of it.
Me add these again, and we'll keep going.
So back to the the the larger point,
Here we are with
the ga conversation.
So Mike Ben's was talking about this
recently, this is posted another twelfth. Right? Again,
the point being, we know
that is public. Twitter posted this. Everybody knows
that. And this is being posted constantly under
every 1 of these posts I'm showing. Everyone
at Elon post, Like, you know, this 1.
You'll you'll find this post down below. I
don't know if the first, but I saw
it already under here where someone goes, well,
what about this, Elon, you know, ever they
see it. It's there. They tag him and
everything.
My point is this is interesting that Mike
is saying a reminder of everything Elon has
been doing to spread his and to to
spend his end ex own resources.
I don't what else would you be spending
to save your right on to save your
right to free speech on the Internet?
Think about this this is what I'm saying.
Like. So you're gonna say that.
When you just made a statement about how
ga was this big threat to what we're
doing and now Twitter is as you were
saying that you already know Ga is associated
with Twitter.
But, yeah, he's saving a free speech though.
And even then, you can prove, they're still
sensory people. So this this feels a partisan
motivated thing, which worries me, and it is
being used to manipulate people that are
swayed by the partisan.
And he goes, has a list there. You
can look at.
Here he retweeted Musk,
saying, accurate. In regard to Eu, 1 of
the legal secret deal, which we read the
other day. Basically saying that you secretly send
him a deal, which I don't know how
we can approve, but I wouldn't surprise me
saying that basically, if you
bring back the team that they want on
Twitter that will continue to censor people. We
won't find you and so on,
which it's not really secret now. They're basically
publicly saying that. They're saying, look, you need
to put these people back and need to
The blue checks aren't accurate and blah blah
blah, Which I don't think it's genuine at
all. I think there's people just trying to
censor dangerous information to them. But it's accurate.
And he's retweeted, but you know that this
not as clear as it seems. Now here
is ben Shapiro.
Speaking front of Congress?
Right? As we can prove that they're working
with the very entity that he's screaming about,
which we also should be concerned about ga
is alarming. But he says in the name
of the constitution and the name of democracy,
Ga was just blasted in front of God
in Congress and confirmed to be the biggest
Pos
organization that's ever been created.
By the left.
Okay, Todd with Trump that explained from me
why Elon and Twitter just partnered. In fact,
re partnered 10 days ago, and you're posting
this now. With the very group that you're
all screaming about, I just think this is
incredibly fascinating.
Elon Musk then tags the tweet about Elon.
Here's what's so so interesting. This is the
eleventh. 10 days after they've re partnered with
Ga.
Here is Ben shapiro on the tenth, talking
about Ga. Elon Musk,
quote the tweet and says having seen the
evidence une earth in congress you know, of
the group he's working with. Twitter has no
choice, but the file suit against the perpetrators.
Ga.
The group he's working with. So now you're
gonna sue the group that Twitter's is working
with because you're... I don't this seems like
a very lazy or,
this this seems either like a very lazy
ploy,
just
completely banking on the fact that people will
plug their plug the ears and
blind their eyes to the reality because a
partisan or I'm missing something, or there's something
which is always possible. There's something else going
on around this that explains why
that would be that stupidly obvious. You let
me know in the chat. I think that's
interesting.
The goes, and the collaborators in this advertising
boycott racket. That's ga and the rest of
them.
He goes, hopefully, some states will consider criminal
incremental prosecution against the group by the way
that Twitter is currently working with. Here,
daily wire, Sharing the same thing. And Shapiro
on how ga censorship Cartel uses brand safety
guidelines to squash conservative media.
So if Elon is working with conservative media
squash guidelines,
then I guess he's not a conservative hero.
Now, I think we all know that. He's
a
government aligned entity, driving in the great reset
and everything else we're talking about without, you
know, using things that you guys seem to
care about. Now and I think Ben Shapiro
has shown himself to be a gut manipulator
clearly because of what Israel's is doing that
was exposed,
but let's keep that in mind as they're
will ignoring the genocide are going on and
ignoring things that highlight all the lies they've
right about Israel's history about zion.
So why we would trust this. I mean,
I think these are these are the allowed,
you know, these are the chosen entities within
this paradigm.
He said they quit as quote, If they
simply wish to levy a boycott against a
right wing source, they should simply say, that's
what they're doing. Hiding behind fake standards in
order to project objectivity in major problem in
transparency for the market.
Let's realize right now that they're centric people
on Twitter that ben shapiro called for people
to be sensor who are speaking about Israel.
So these people are Hypo. Simple as that.
Now here's what I find even more interesting.
This is the new york post as of
2 days ago.
So all of the rest of it, you
might be able to argue that somehow they
just didn't see it, which I just find
as ridiculously impossible, but certainly possible. That's that
sound contradictory, but I find it to be
ridiculously unlikely, but certainly possible.
But this is a supposed journalism platform in,
you know, in the reporters.
And they write this entire article. On the
eleventh, 10 days after Twitter has re associate
themselves with Ga, which is the focal point
of this article and says Elon Musk threatens
to sue major companies
over advertising Boycott Racket, that's gone, targeting, right
leaning media, which is not targeting. It's targeting
people that are
projecting,
talking about sharing uncomfortable truth.
But the whole article goes on about this.
Elon musk threaten legal action against this group.
He brought the company formally know Twitter, you
know, just praising his work and so on,
you know, saving right wing media,
Shapiro testified
about ga.
That really is 1 of the main focal
points if not the focal point of what
he was talking about. It says Ga is
an initiative established probably.
World Federation of advertisers, which includes Disney, Cola,
Toyota, Hershey, among others,
most many of which are completely, you know,
should be boycott because of their support of
Israel. To address the challenge of harmful content
that digital media you,
says their members account for roughly 90 percent
of all the global advertising spending.
Interesting.
The damning house interim staff report compiled ahead
of the hearing?
Says, quote, they denied organizing a boycott, we're
we're recommending that our members stop advertising on
Twitter in an interview with investigators. However, in
1 internal email,
Clearly, that's not the truth. I mean, this
is obvious stuff. The house report also found
bias against conservative outlets. Of course, they did.
That's not... It's not shocking or they're leading
you like the blind right into something. The
Pie piper of 2 party illusion. 1 section
detailed an email conversation between rank of Ga
and John, Montgomery, an executive vice President of
Global brand safety of Group m and the
world's largest Bd buying agency. The 2 executives
quote, discussed a strategy of blocking certain news
outlets like Fox, Daily Y or B. Course
it did,
which will then drive people to think that
those are the ones telling you the truth.
Simple dynamic.
That by the way, that's that's not what
that's not doesn't have to mean ga aware
that they're being used that way. Mind you?
There are people that are motivated and part...
Just like they are in regard to partisan.
But my point overall is the same?
Do you notice what's missing from this article?
An opening statement Musk
Shapiro urged... You, shared by an open his
statement shared by Musk, Shapiro urged Congress to
reign in what he describes as censorship cartel
like Ga.
So both Shapiro,
musk shared this, New York post makes the
article, all of which seems to blatantly ignore
that Twitter is working with that group. I
know I've said this 0.14 times over, but
my god, what am I missing here?
This is just ridiculous. This is mean, here's
what I said earlier to somebody to to
make us clear.
III
believe in my heart. And this is why
I do this.
That more people see what we're talking about
then they want you to know. That there
is a majority out there, people that are
unaware that they're
on those side of the majority. And if
we could just get their attention enough to
recognize that we see we could really change
a lot of stuff. But because of the
paradigm and corporate media, driving you back every
that then we we can lose that.
My point is things like this make me
wonder if I'm wrong.
Where I'm thinking how is it possible that
there's no big conversation about how stupidly obvious
this is. Not corporal Media is only gonna
do what they're told, but where are the
other comment.
Why isn't there a person who's on the
right going wait a minute. Now there are
by the way I can see on Twitter.
And again, I'm please shit send this to
me if you see it out there. Because
things are so compartment. The internet at these
days you can't find out the time what
you're looking for. I'd like to shout them
out if they are.
But isn't it a little bit disconcerting to
realize with all of the large accounts, all
of the major influencers that are associated as
the right, like, they call themselves Republicans,
that support Elon Musk saving free speech and
not a single 1 of them has called
this out, not in the real way that
people are doing right now in regard to
ga and musk fighting it.
That's I mean, what this does is it
it un comfortably highlights something that they don't
want people looking at. That this is all
lie.
The house judiciary from Gop,
shared this on the tenth.
Ga harm, how the world's biggest brands controlled
control online speech.
Corporates,
corporations, ad agencies and associations through the global
alliance, Ga are participated and coordinated actions to
demo content.
Yeah. Same thing. Not a single mention.
Talking about
this.
We're excited to be part of ga.
Here's Jeff Younger. Saint the thing I'm all
calling out. Here here Elon musk said extremely
concerning. Now by the way,
B x highlighted this and it's been more
obvious than ever lately.
Isn't it interesting that all of his comments
seem to, you know, yes. You're correct. I
agree externally concerning, at least, you know, when
it's in most of them and occasionally get
the log of a tweet. And you... If
you look at the timing of these.
I the 1 that is when b broke
this down. I'm like, I don't know how
that's even possible. He's using bots. That's my
opinion. On a platform we're supposed to be
removing bots. Just make that clear. But
News new report is says how the... That's
my opinion. I said that, but I'll make
that clear. New report it says, how the
world's biggest brands seek control online speech. Right?
That's what we just pointed to.
Right? That's the tweet we just showed you,
which talks about explicitly ga.
That's what he's he.
Quotes that tweet and says, extremely concerning
on the on the tenth,
while they're working a group.
Just I just can't can't get passed how
crazy. This is so stupid. And Jeff Young
says, I'm puzzled by his concern. They working
with ga. Am I missing something? Like, it's
the same thing Everyone's said, what? This doesn't
make any sense. Here GGW highlights this list
of
companies that are working with Garmin. And now
here's how we have. We have to boycott
or whatever he's talking about?
What do he say? I thought he said,
boycott cotton somewhere?
Maybe it's the wrong tweet. But he says,
members are... The the list of the members
working with Garmin.
May may may want to rethink oh, so,
yeah, same. That's what he said. May want
to rethink buying from these companies or supporting
that support censorship. Right? And this person says,
well, you forgot 1. Well
just crazy to me.
Now here are a couple of clips that
I wanna play I open with this 1
just to show you what we're talking about.
You guys know this, but just kind of
resent her where we are where we're thought
bigger topics going on. Here's the world I
can form. A a long time ago. This
is the global technology governance Summit in Japan.
I believe it was 20 21.
They're just showing you what their mindset is.
And these world economic forum, that's the flagship
product. That's gone That's what that is. What
they're telling you is what Elon and Twitter
are working with, which is that we need
to control what you say. Hey, Look at
that. Instagram. Centered our show.
Important to point out that we're not policing
the Internet for harmful material that we actually
rely on citizens to collect evidence to report
to the platform first,
and then report to us if serious
seriously harmful content isn't taken down, So we
will really set up And that will be
Twitter in this case. Right? That's the partner
they're working with. As a safety net when
when some of this falls through the cracks.
We're not... Seeking to become the content moderators
ourselves.
You know, we will believe that the platforms
build the digital roads. They also need to
wreck the digital guard rails and the safety
guard rails, and be, you know, applying the
virtual seat belts.
Here is another 1.
This 1 is
from the,
sustainable development goals kind of summit conversation. I
think it was goal keeping,
something. They're talking same thing.
At Bill Gates. I forget the woman's name
in the middle, but you'll recognize her and
the gentleman I forget as well. But the
point is this is just a central conversation
through all the same channels. World like Economic
4, They'll way, Joe, talking about how we
have to control information.
Very very clearly. Again, just to make it
clear what that group they're working with is
doing.
On the supply side, I think we have
a bigger problem in some ways. We... I
feel that we have to work with the
platforms. I mean, the platforms are already now,
the the social platforms are already beginning to
filter things. Now, some of it might agree
with it. Some of our... Some of us
might not agree with it. But I feel
there is no choice. We have to work
with platforms to ensure that there is more
authoritative
information surfaced. The platforms work with authoritative,
sources to ensure that only that information services.
Okay. I'm not seeing delete stuff, but maybe
suppress the distribution of it, which some platforms
do already. But if I think this... The
problem is technology linked and distribution linked. The
solution 2, I think will be technology and
distribution link at least to some point. I
do think really let me add 1 plus
1 I think I said 3 and then
gave to media literacy, which is what, what
we call kind what you're describing here is,
it is it is key. I think the
real challenge with
trying to moderate it as a supply problem
here is that we see new platforms coming
constantly that are not willing to engage in
those conversations. And so dealing on the demand
side means that regardless of what the new
platform is or what the new technology is
or the decent
of social media, which is, you know, kind
of beginning, but going to continue. We see
it quite directly here the Us. Is that
you create a very resilient public
As you note, on any number of issues,
health and pandemics is only 1. And so
teaching people to understand here's is how information
moves today. Here's is what it looks like.
I think just pays dividends in so many
different ways and is really a global solution
regardless of what the specific nuance of a
particular emerging platform is. And at what we
found is, I think the more fun you
make it, the more people participate. Yeah. And
and the more jerry, it sounds like a,
like, almost like a government program, the more
more people will not take up You know?
So when we said, maybe we we don't
want wanna do a 45 minute workshop on,
on Instagram. So what we said we wanna
do is workshop to develop critical thinking because
that's important for you. No one's gonna touch.
Take it. Right. You say come and have
fun and find out, you know, whether this
video was fake or not, people will... More
likely people will participate.
And last 1, and then we have a
couple of updates I'll show you in regard
to the Trump conversation. This 1 has to
do with
Australia, but same point, and they even mentioned
Twitter in regard to how this needs to
be enforced. A radical plan to crack down
on social media abuse is being considered by
the federal gov. For more nines, Oliver Hague
joins us Saliva Adelaide, Ollie, how will it
work?
Leila, good morning. Essentially, it will work the
same as a past border Australians forced to
submit 100 points of
identification like their driver's license or pass bought
when using social media accounts like Facebook and
Twitter and our police would have access to
those social media accounts, and it's all part
of down on online abuse. Now users could
be liable for defamation...
Criminal
prosecution, and it's all part of, plan hoping
to deter people from engaging in bad behavior.
Now the recommendations were handed down by a
federal parliamentary
inquiry. There reforms that are being considered by
the Morrison government with the chairman saying there
is merit to remove
to remove
the veil of being anonymous. Leila?
So okay. We got a couple of updates.
I'm I'm laughing actually because there... There's an
issue with my my temperature in here. So
I took up my coat. I knew that
I'd accidentally do that. So you guys deem
me like, Not like that's matters. But so
here here's are some updates for the podcast.
I just... It blip and showed the shot
and I have my code off.
So there's a couple of updates. I think
are interesting. So that... This is from task
and purpose, which... A a platform that I...
You know, it's... It had pretty reliable information
in my experience.
Actually, what I'm want... I'll I'll grab when
we get there. Actually. I'm somebody read this
first, it says agent heard saying, shooter is
down as Trump rushed off stage. The former
president appeared to be bleeding from the ear,
Now it says the 4 president was rushed
off the stage,
seeing the footage, grabbing his ear. Security rushed.
It says,
including some combat years and are we good?
Another says shooters down. Local news is reporting
that 1 person believed dead according to the
Butler county attorney
district attorney, the person was not identified nor
was the manner of death. After a minute,
Trump stood up and was escorted away.
Oh, let's see.
Okay. So that's just simply saying that's the
only new part of that is that they
said shooter is down. K? Here is
Sky news,
1 dead at Trump rally has blood former
president tell supporters to fight.
Oh, just showing you that's just the the
update. So here here's what's interesting.
So this this is what I wanted to
grab, but I didn't didn't like it downloaded.
Hold on.
Okay.
Let me grab this real quick. We'll play
this for you. Now, this is saying that
they have an emergency doctor. But again, take
this with a grand salt, guys. We don't
know who these people are. We don't know,
you know, anything about it. To just be
be, you know, skeptical what we're seeing here.
That's exactly where I heard come from. What
did you see, sir?
I heard the shots of
I
I thought it was fire to begin with.
Somebody over there was screaming. He's been shot.
He's been shot, so I made my way
over,
said, I'm in a emergency department physician.
Let me help you. The guy had spun
around was jammed between the benches. He had
a head shot here. There's lots blood,
and he had brain matter
there. And so I got him...
There's tall coffee coming in to get.
So I got people there really helpful. I
got it
saw. Did Cpr dip chest compressions as well
as a agreed for.
I'm trying.
You did evacuate everybody. So that the interesting
thing is is that, yeah I mean, clearly
it's got blood all over shirts. It's interesting
thing is that this is now
the the first report was that... And this
is again, how this always works and why
I have to be very careful when people
are just shouting things out online that it
was said that that was the, somebody behind
him that got shot. Right? So if that's
the shooter, and he was shooting forward, that
would explain why there wouldn't people be in
the crowd that got shot. Right?
But wouldn't there people on the other side
that a good shot? Like, it seems likely
with that many shots that somebody else would
have been hit. And that does seem to
be kinda still floating around?
Here is what
All Olivia Rubin is saying from Abc.
The shooter at the Trump rally is dead
and so is 1 by. So that's coming
from Abc, but because the court media does
not mean they're correct.
And that's according to Butler County District attorney,
But that was the attorney that that said
already that the 1 person was shot and
they were referencing the person that's now being
shown as possibly the shooter. But it says
D a Richards Gold said, also says there
is possibly a second by standard debt as
well.
Lots of stuff lying around. Now here, I'm
very, very, very strongly caution about, you know,
I'll just say it quite frankly, this person
lies about a lot of stuff. All the
time and gets caught mis people all the
time.
What Laura Lube has to say is that
Law enforcement neutralize the shooter or Trump rally
you just tried to assassinate Trump.
And shows this video of what we don't
know to be the shooter or not.
Which this is just what she does. Guys.
And my point is that that's
suggesting a that's the shooter. I know if
we know that yet. Very what might be.
I just think it's very important to point
out this person is a known manipulator. Doesn't
mean she has here's. Right have to admit
Lie on Twitter. That's free speech. But make
sure you understand.
Now here is what press Global process is
highlighting, and this 1 as well, Wall Street
silver. Now again,
This part of it is notoriously.
Shown to be... Not that this is. I
don't know whether this false or not, but
this the way this works where an image
gets played
somebody highlights they say, this is the person.
They said,
I... The point is I shouldn't not tense
it up I'm gonna point it out. But
Trump shooter, they say is a
antifa member.
Global press is saying per the Butler police
department, which again, I don't know if that's
the case. This is what they're claiming. Up,
and the post was deleted. So see how
that works, guys. That's a good experiment for
for real time information. I don't know that
they deleted it, that's probably means it's not
true. We'll find out later won't we? Here's
Wall Street Silver just simply pointing to the
same thing. But
I my gut would tell me it it's
probably not true. Only because of the way
it's already gone. Not to say that it
wouldn't be an anti antifa member or any
of that I think that's probably likely at
this point. But
Let's find out if that's the reality or
not, They're claiming uploaded a video saying justice
is coming.
Interesting though that this is already deleted though,
isn't it?
Tells me something might be a little bit
off. It's just this is so way. Look,
let's be clear about this in the context
of free speech.
Everybody out there has the right to say
what they want to say what they think
is happening. That's social media for you. That's
it's not, you know, the idea of whether
they're for... They're doing in regard to Twitter
or at, you know, at least the present
presentation about them pushing back with Elon is
that they're trying to say that, look, blue
checks is supposed to be authoritative information. Well,
that doesn't even to make any sense. This
is social media. Right? If you're if you
are going to social media with the... With
the...
Expectation that everything you're gonna see is true,
then you're a child,
That's a. I mean, if you're going to
the corporate media, expecting everything you're hearing with
you. That's where... That's what they want to
create. This gospel like reality where you go
or you know the truth well, where where
they will then use that place to lie
to you. That's how government works.
So this is interesting though that this happens.
I mean, let's I'm just gonna kinda of
leave this here for now and we're gonna
come back like we should to be responsible
about this and when we have more information
we can prove.
At the moment, it seems clear the Trump
was shot. It seems pretty clear that the
reports were getting from at least corporate and
the and the a district attorney, which both
of which are just as potentially false La,
we should be... What they're showing is another
person appears to have been shot at the
1 they carried away.
And they're reporting that maybe another person was
shot on top of that maybe 1 more,
but it's all up in the air at
the moment.
Interesting though. See, and this is how dangerous,
and this is what they would point at
to argue why this should be censored is
that people posting stuff like this if it
turned out to be false. What happens to
that person right there. Right? That's a real
person. He gets tracked down. People think he
shot Trump and, you know, and this happened
during the Boston Bombing.
Right? I mean, this is very common where
people then rush out say the wrong thing
and people get hurt by it. Now that...
If if if ultimately somebody hurts that person,
that's the responsibility of the person that acted.
Not the person who's saying what their lie
is or what they believe to be the
truth. That's what free speech is, guys. That's
the that's the way it should be looked
at.
Yeah. So Abc is definitely reporting that the
shooter was killed.
So we'll come back. We'll find out later.
Show discernment, guys. Be careful. A lot of
people out there try to deceive you all
the time.
Now,
just to kinda of finish up this point,
I just think it's really important that we
recognize that people are being played.
Right? I mean, it's very, very obvious that
central players and the 2 party illusion
whether they know that or not of themselves
are choosing to ignore what Twitter is doing.
I I mean, I think that's pretty transparent
dishonest.
I'm not pointing anybody to in particular. I
just think it's important to recognize how that's
being played. And whether let's just say tomorrow
they come out and go never mind ga,
which they kinda keep we keep seeing. Right?
Where things happen and then pushback, whether it's
authentic or people being censored and people freak
out about it rightly and they go, oh,
wait. It was a mistake,
and we must know it That's not the
case. We must know that that's the norm,
and we marshal commercial enough
resistance for to recognize that it wasn't worth
it. May not be able to do it
with this,
but I do not believe for a second
that this is
some misunderstanding or that Elon is not aware
that this is happening with his company.
So please show some discernment here.
And on a quick slightly related note,
solomon Ahmed amid highlights that Microsoft
permanently bans Palestinians who use Skype to call
Gaza.
Think about that for a second.
He says disgraceful censorship by the same zion
as lead society that preach free speech to
the world.
But not, they don't mean any of it.
Rules based international order. Right? They don't mean
these things. They're just trying to project what
they know you want.
But it says the the headlines says Microsoft
killed my online life.
Microsoft is reportedly banning palestinians in the United
States mind you, for life,
for simply calling people in Gaza.
Now My point is,
Microsoft is a partner with all the same
stuff, overlap with all the same conversations And
what you... What I'm highlighting is in a
lot is AAA
similar
alignment to what Elon is taking to what
Twitter is taking
And they're not supposed to be on the
same side. Right? Microsoft and the Covid 19
agenda of Bill Gates and we're supposed to
be the other bad guy side, but really
they're all lame in the same direction if
you're really paying attention. Because that's... Because there
is no 2 party game here, guys Well,
there are clearly 2 parties and people are
part of those parties. But the real string
coolers are not part of it.
They laugh at us for taking sides against
each other. While, they're w us all into
something new.
Oh, and I forgot about this, actually. This
is sort of unrelated, but Thought this was
fascinating.
This group highlights that and Ai are working
on a reasoning technology
that they're now calling strawberry, but guess what
it was first called.
Q.
And that could be a coincidence.
But what else would you call? Realize open
Ai,
elon musk gonna... Ai. All of this is
interestingly
overlap And he just goes, where we're told
it do would be a paper clip maximize,
but it's actually going to be strawberry fields
forever.
Realize they're all about Ai just their Ai
I a point is
Isn't it possible that q itself was some
kind of artificial intelligence testing algorithm. They were
just using it to test and and get
information back on how we engage with these
things? Wouldn't that... Couldn't you call what that
was a reasoning technology,
pumping out these different things and watching as
you engage in assessing out your... That's fascinating
to think about. That would make perfect sense
for how this was used. But in any
case,
realize that this is all, like, every angle
of this is not in your interest guys,
and I think that's very clear.
Now since we took so much time on
that other conversation, I might not get to
everything we're also gonna talk about today, but
that was definitely and still is a an
important and relevant thing that just happened. So
I'm definitely going to
follow up on that, and I'm gotta talk
about whatever else we didn't get to today.
If that ends up being the case, but
just based on where we. I think that
might be. I didn't have as much time
as I usually do today.
But so first, I wanna start with this
in getting into a foreign policy Israel conversation
part of this.
I find this to be really interesting. So
what you're looking at here for the podcast,
Ti ib shared this. This is Captain America.
You know, well, I forget his name now.
The guy who plays Captain America.
What is it again? I forget his name.
Signing a bomb. But it's it but it's
an American, Us bomb. He said it's AUA
Us air force person holding the bomb and
he signing Now I can only imagine this
is gonna be used in some context in
regard Israel. And, that's what this is all
about right now. But I mean, it doesn't
even matter if that's the case. My point
is
why would you do that?
Like, really think about the general point here.
What's the what why would you do that?
Clearly, in their mind, they think they're doing
of they're supporting freedom or whatever naive thing
they think they're doing.
But
nobody is arguing that we want to kill
people.
Even though we know that is part of
this in some cases, putting even for even
the government, they're going, we're reluctant being forced
to do this because we're fighting for freedom.
Right?
Okay. So what you're signing
is the tool that's used to kill.
So if that's supposed to be a reluctant
an act that we are forced to do,
signing it is, like,
promoting. Yay. This is celebrating
the thing that we're supposed to be reluctant
using because we're forced because bad guys.
Does that seem wildly the contradictory?
Because all all this really amounts to is
normalizing the worst state.
May it seem like some kind of fun
video game or some kind of movie or
some kind of freedom, we're praising, freedom and
democracy by signing weapons that milk murder children.
Which I don't care What where were you're
talking about? They were children. Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan,
got Palestine. It's the same thing.
Some of them are much more targeted than
others,
Evans Chris Evans. That's what it was. But
why would you sign this?
I just want you to think about that.
Especially when you have people like Nikki Haley
and people signing bombs that are literally being
used to murder children, like deliberately
and writing kill them all or whatever she
wrote on that? I just think that's an
interesting thing. And he said Boycott, Captain America.
Now, Craig, Mo highlights this in regarding to
netanyahu
coming to the United States. Says Americans should
watch closely with Netanyahu the head of the
oppressive foreign regime whose government is on trial
for Genocide, and who is himself accused of
crimes against humanity by the Icc prosecutor
appears before their congress on July 20 fourth.
I can note of this.
Record who attends. Applaud him stands for him,
embraces him. These are the corrupted ones.
Those bought or c by the regime.
It's lobby or its intelligence agencies, those who
funnel your money to the regime.
Attack Us citizens on behalf of the regime
and damage Us standing and interest abroad.
While you struggle to make ends meet, and
Palestinians die in their threat and the thousands,
make no mistake.
These are your antagonists.
They... The call is coming from inside the
house.
And the senate,
record their names and hold them accountable.
I mean, it's really important to think about.
And here's what to making... Clear.
Times israel reports this. Netanyahu mold Europe stop
over
on his trip to United States, but but
flies directly to the United States, amid fears
of the Icc.
So think about this, Europe, he's more afraid
to go to Europe for fear that he
might be arrested. Why? Because he's a criminal,
even poor even to his own people by
you, But in this case, we're talking about
the genocide,
knowing that any party who is a party
to the Genocide convention is now obligated legally
to take action.
So he goes, well, I'm not gonna go
Europe because they might actually do something, But
I wanna go to the Us because I
know I'm safe there.
Did that not ring true for people right
now as we're all screaming about the over
influence if not
occupation of our government by a foreign power?
And as criminal
who the vast majority of the world is
openly acknowledging is a criminal, including his own
people in part of his own government
and your government welcomes him with open arms.
Let's see if they give a standing ovation
this time both sides as usual or let
them speak for the podium.
How much you wanna bet?
My point is to recognize that your government
is if not, I mean, in this context,
seemingly the worst,
he'll happily fly here because he knows nothing's
gonna happen. Now I hope something happens. I
hope somebody
involved in any context with any legal standing
tries to breast him.
They should. He's a criminal. It's he is
being charged by the Icc. He is being
accused by the Ic. It's obvious.
So if something happens, how would they stop
that? How would they stand in the way?
And if they did, wouldn't that look bad
for them?
It's fascinating.
Now going further, Assault rod highlights this in
regard to even cnn just covered this.
The title is the Us held off sanction,
and this is the point about why the
Us government is just feeble, fe coward.
The Us held off sanction, all sides of
it. Right? The government, not left or right.
Held off sanction this Israeli unit, which is
we're talking about the most extreme unit that's
been clearly shown to commit some of the
most greatest war crimes. I mean
viola atrocities. Since October seventh. That's why they
pretended they were gonna sanction them and then
sm screamed at them, and they pulled back.
But it says the Us held off, sanction
the or the... This is really army unit
despite evidence of abuses, which is a very
kind word right there.
Now its forces are shaping the fight in
Gaza.
Surprise surprise. The 1 that was the worst
is now leading the charge because that's what's
going on over there. Here's what they said
in the article, which you can lay links
right there.
It says the Id idea,
often Scape goats junior soldiers or officers arguing
that abuses are the fault of too bad
apples rather than reflective of institutional problems stemming
from long standing military practices or government policies.
Yeah. Over a window, it's gone isn't it.
The findings by the expert panel would have
been enough to disqualify a military unit from
any other country, the official said.
And then I said the quiet part out
loud. Of course, we treat israel differently.
And that really undermine underpins our human rights
advocacy in the rest of the world.
That's the Us government speaking or an entity
an entity of the United States.
I mean, I just... It's incredible.
And or rather from the state department.
So what they're highlighting for you is that,
yes, we treat Israel
special.
And if we say that, you're apparently racist
anti semi.
Even though it's true.
And what you're highlighting is not just they
treat differently, but that we look of the
other way when we all see them committing
crimes. You know, even Biden was about to
sanction them. So there's no pretending, it turned
out they didn't commit crimes. They did.
We just treat them differently.
Now again, do not take this as cnn
suddenly seeing the truth. I find that impossible
to believe.
I think it's just so overt
that they recognize if they keep doing this
like Biden administration that they will lose everything.
So they start showing you the truth. Even
though even though they know they're gonna lose
some funding through israel, you they're gonna be
attacked, but realize Israel was damn near collapsing
at this point. I don't even covered this
much.
So curious to see where this goes, but
boycott
have ruined a lot or the yep you
humanity aspect and blocking shipments, they're collapsing. Things
are falling apart through throughout it We're like
economically right now. Look, it's, you know, quite
an interesting point right there. See how that
works. It'll taste your own and what you've
been doing to Iran and yemen everybody else
for this whole time. The point is
it's clear that the effort to stand up
against them from an economic perspective is clearly
working, which is why they were so afraid
of the Bd movement.
It's and I saw rod highlights, propaganda. This
is about Raf in general, but just showing
you that this is the fact list government.
Pretending they're fighting them as she says, propaganda
and reality. First, what you saw them saying
in May. If israel real Pays Raf. I'm
not supplying the weapons.
You and this is as of July tenth.
Us 2 again ship 500 pound bombs israel
reversing suspension. Oh, yeah. They was Raf, but,
you know, we... It's been long enough. We
we we assume you forgot about that. Right?
That says foreign reporters witnessed widespread
devastation in Raf.
2 months after these really military launched the
ground defensive. The ground defensive. You're listening Kirby
isn't not supposed to be the major operation
you claimed wasn't gonna happen and nobody's talked
about it. Coward.
The city was described as a flattened wasteland,
a maze of rubble,
unrecognizable,
but it's a minor operation though.
Even though they've occupied the whole thing at
this point, didn't vast majority.
Well, here's where Her wrote as of the
twelfth yesterday.
Alright. This a... As of yesterday. Yeah. He
said it says, I'm warning netanyahu, and this
is the... From the writing.
Soon, arrest warrants will be issued against you.
For the crimes being carried out every day
in the West Bank by Israel.
With the support of its government, while you
intentionally turn a blind eye. And of course,
obviously, it's not just Jude and Mary West
Bay it's also Gaza. But the point is
They're calling them out.
Now what's interesting about this.
Is that ultimately as it says here, arrest
warrants will be issued against Israel's political leaders
and mil military commanders. But
as this usually goes, it is the state
of Israel itself that will be put on
trial in the end. And maybe that's what
should happen. But the point is that there
are people in this country that do not
believe and agree with what's happening. No matter
how what... No matter what am I how
much a minority it may be.
So it's important to recognize that that's what
usually happens with corrupt entities like this is
the people suffer.
Or the state itself. And the point is
that ultimately we're watching these people who have
the zion entity that has created what we're
talking about here. And even their own people
are calling this out. As we get to
the end, we're gonna talk more about the
West Bank and the point being, I'm gonna
make sure I talk about that.
That they the pop population, the the more
radical localized converge grouping of the population, clearly
are pointing out West Bank asthma... But rather
specifically pointing out the atrocities are carrying out
in regard to the fact they have hostages
over in Gaza, but they're seemingly weirdly okay
with what's going on the West Bank, showing
you a contradiction. Are really showing you that
they more so care about the agenda,
then they really do about the international law
violations, and we'll get there in a minute.
But the point is, even Her is now
saying,
war coming. You're gonna be arrested.
You know he sees this.
Now let's get to the masters today.
Just simply saying that they've bombed the safe
zones. I mean, you know, what... You... Which
1. Right? Was yesterday the day before, the
last week, the last 9 months it happened.
It's happened sense the first week forward.
Nonstop. They bomb where they are, they bomb
where they're going, they bomb where they get
to. They bomb the safe zone. They bomb,
you know, there is nothing safe in this
in this area. It's simple as that.
Everybody has made this clear. And your governments
just keep dragging their feet and drink because
they're... It's there's too far. They've gone too
far. There is no coming back from this.
The Matt Miller of the world, the biden
of the world, the blankets of the world
they are stuck.
You can't just suddenly change your narrative because
then you make it even more clear that
you've been committing Genocide.
Committing genocide.
As Ti various highlights, is real committed to
massacres, and then she says already today.
Meanwhile, the man most responsible has been invited
to speak in congress to lie to the
racist in charge of the United States.
He says we live in a Us created
hell.
Another massacre in Northern Gaza,
less than an hour after the tents, massacres
and Con.
And this was 12 hours ago was posted
on the thirteenth.
Today. So yet again, in Con, the safe
location, they bombed people tents. Now there's no...
There's not even a narrative about Hamas locate.
This... They're they're trying to make it about
1 person.
Except they've already admitted that person might not
have been killed.
Despite all the people like, elon Le screaming.
We did it. We know we did it,
and then Israel comes out and goes maybe
we didn't. Just showing you these people are
patent liars as Wi Carson says. Who just
shout the thing that's supposed to say in
the moment even though usually it ends up
being something different. That's elon Le in a
nutshell.
But the point is that these people were
murdered.
For nothing.
And then they went on to bomb people
that were praying.
Maybe to make a point, I don't really
know there's not even a narrative at this
point outside of the 1 location in Con.
Now there is some graphic stuff when here
here's some repair yourself.
Robert Writes, Israel commits another heinous civilian massacre
in Gaza. Now what he's reporting they're reporting
in some locations varies as usual He's saying
a hundred and 30 casualties were reported so
far. I've seen it vary between 75 and
a hundred and 30.
Huge air strikes targeted an area that supposed
to be a civilian designated zone in con
units. That's not even ever debate. It's on
the maps. This is supposed to be a
location that this won't happen. Now I'll even
show you why they claim that doesn't matter.
This is the whole point. They say safe
zone, and that if they simply go well,
we got intelligence says there was a mosque
guy there. So we bombed it. That that's
that's their narrative.
Even decided to bomb really broadly because we
wanted to make sure we got it. And
this is what they're saying.
That's just just incredible. I think this is
gonna fly with anybody other than the completely
disgusting government that backs them up.
Now, by the way, Robert pretty consistently tends
to have these accurate longer before other people,
including with the original conversation of October 7.
So if he's saying hundred and 30, I
would put that more accurate than most. But
he says western leaders couldn't care less that
they use your tax to fund this.
Oh 1 of the points that's really disgusting
about this. What you're seeing there are work
aid workers and and and
civil workers. You're what firefighters and ambulance drivers.
Who were bombed.
They bombed and they bombed again and bombed
them while they were trying to help people
that they just bombed. Guys, This is the
common tactic. This is what the United States
and Saudi Arabia and A kinda qaeda did
in regard to Yemen. We see this anywhere
of these things are happening. And both the
Israel is currently and has been involved with
what's going on in Yemen.
Mush off Ba highlights since this and says
the
Israeli Army committed this morning. 1 of the
worst in the Gaza strip killing more than
the hundred civilian Palestinians,
including children and injuring hundreds. The army bomb
bombarded a densely pop an area, which seems
to be what they usually do in Ama
Con units,
which the army claimed was a safe area
for tens of thousands of refugees
deported by bombardment from Raf
and other districts.
Remember, they told you oh it's safe own,
Ama. They that... That's the... They've been pushing
people there.
Netanyahu is using massacres against palestinians to undermine
negotiations.
1 possibility.
Francesca Albany, Eu un Rep repertoire says I
am horrified by yet another senseless massacre of
Palestinian civilians by israel.
Now, she reports this is early 71 killed
nearly 300 wounded in a zone where Israel
itself
had told them to seek refuge.
The justification is always the same. Targeted Palestinian
militants. That's exactly every time what they say.
When is the world going to stop this
deadly machine, this death machine.
How Highlights, they drought... They drone and murdered
multiple firefighters that rushed to the scene of
the Milwaukee, humanitarian and safe zone that Israel
bomb this morning. They bombed them as they
were rushing to save them. This is the
most disgusting aspect of this stuff. This is
waiting, knowing what you did and then choosing
to bond people coming to help them. If
you're pretending that's about hamas, then you're a
special kinda of stupid. Here is
Highlighting
the actual shop.
The moment Zion jets targeted the civil defense
teams who just arrived the scene after they
bomb Was.
Oh, sorry. That's not the 1.
I don't know what's going on with this
stuff. Hold on.
Here is the video. I... I want you
to see this because it's very clear.
There's no confusing this
And that's what a lot of the stuff
is right now. There's just really no confusing
this with some kind of a, you know,
accidental action.
Okay.
So you can see
as they're they're there to help people They
just bombed.
Right? I mean, and and as they're helping
people into the ambulance as the firefighter truck
stop they bomb it directly.
And that's what you're seeing. And they are
the shot. Use firefighters and in different civil
workers being thrown into... You know, in wherever
they can put them to deal with this.
Now, just like we were... We've been telling
you the entire time.
Israel forces are dropping Us made Mk 8
4 bombs weighing a ton.
Of explosives in a the deadly massacre. The
very things that Biden said shouldn't be used
in these areas.
The area, by the way, designated as a
safe zone.
Again, and again, and again,
Now,
very out from 9 72 magazine
reports, Hamas Military chief, Mohammed Da was Id
target.
In the attack that killed as at this
0.20 the 20 pounds is early in the
morning, which was way more than 20 at
this point.
Now, of course, you see then all of
the simple same old prop
come out and scream the thing that justifies
in their minds, the murder of all these
innocent people. Hundred and 30 people, lots of
plenty children.
Mohammed D is 1 of the most evil
people on Earth, Arson says, And key architect
of the October 7 massacre.
Which I don't... I mean, this... That I've
seen them make this claim about many people.
And quite frankly, I don't know why anybody.
Anywhere would be taking what they claim at
face value. I mean, they've been... And this
is like with Ukraine. The same thing. It's
not even up for debate. It's an objective
reality. They've been caught lying about literally every
part of this conversation. Not everything that happened,
but but every aspect of it.
What happened in October seventh, what they did
people, the rape allegations, the different atrocity propaganda.
What happened when they went back to gaza
of what's been going on since. They've been
lying about every part of it.
It's pro, guys, even the corporate media has
been forced to acknowledge in plenty of times.
So he says if he was indeed taken
out, think about that.
That's a good thing.
So if he was taking us a... We're
at a point where we're like, we're not
even sure what's happening, but we're... It's okay
that we... We killed a hundred and 30
people because he might have been there.
This is just the most obvious
per version of what we claim international law.
Now you're feeling that levy. Doing what he
does.
This person simply saying the commander here, you
know, what going off and what this person
is. He's the guy we killed. Elon says,
it took nearly 10 years to hunt down
Bin Laden. You know, the person that they
work with,
The warrior piece, the Washington post called in
before he suddenly became the boo man. The
person that clearly as you watched James Corpus
documentaries was not even actually what they There's
so many manipulation around that person. The point
is United States were not what you think
they were in regard Bin laden, But sure.
Let's use that or 09:11, for example.
But he goes took them 10 years to
hunt him down. Really?
5 years to hunt down A baghdad daddy.
Oh, you know what for the sixteenth time?
Yeah. But let's pretend like that wasn't also
alive. He's probably still alive now. After the
rise of Islamic state.
He says, and it's possible
possible.
The Israel just killed 1 of the mastermind
to 10 7, just 9 months after.
So all... The the first thing you do
when you're not even sure it's happened is
come out and say, we beat you. Look
at us. Look how great we are. We
got him in 9 months.
I mean, it's just like this desperate childish
action to make yourself look like and guess
what?
Netanyahu
uncertain if we got them.
What do I mean, uncertain if we got
him. What is that even... I uncertain if
you've killed the guy.
Id have soldiers severely wounded by rocket Debris?
Just live updates.
Hamas sm military chief they claim was the
idea of target.
His condition is unknown.
Okay?
Lawyers here's with Bm reports. This is from
Israeli media.
Interesting. Hold on. Let me take a look
at this real quick.
Yeah, I'll just hit this. It'll pop up.
You see that? Yeah okay.
So
interesting. Yeah. I shouldn't damn it. I should
open this. I I wasn't sure it was,
but now I showed you, so let me
grab this real quick.
I can... I already guarantee this is gonna
be completely un verifiable right now. It says
if this is true. Anytime it says that,
you should very clearly take with a grain
salt. Going to be a lot of questions.
Let me just listen real quick.
Alright. I'll just play it.
I'm so I'm just very reluctant to play
something like this. I find it to be...
You know, it's... I very rarely would we'll
do things like this without even knowing what's
on there.
Just because I think it's... I no matter
even no matter how much I stress caution,
there's gonna be somebody that, you know,
argues
just blindly takes it a face value because
it aligns with something that may think. You
know, I just try to avoid that.
Alright. Hold let me grab it since I
already showed you guys.
See what he says. On who was here.
You were inside the event. Yep. But you
were just outside, Tell us what, yes or
I'm.
So so we had a party year out
day. Then you can see behind us. The
the brick farming greenhouse here. We have a
party.
And we all decided, hey, you know, When
when we hear Trump up there, we're gonna
walk up through the field,
stand by the trees out there into the
shade. Yeah. And watch you written listen to
the rally. Right? We couldn't see him but
we could hear him.
So we walked up and probably
5 to 7 minutes
of Trump speaking I'm wrestling here. I have
no idea, you know. But
we noticed the guy crawling
aren't, you know, bear for and not the
roof
of the building beside us. 50 50 feet
away from us.
So we're standing an there. You know, we're
pointing we're pulling that to guy, crawling up
the roof, and he had a gun. Right?
He had a rifle. Right to get clear
seeing with the rifle.
Absolutely.
We're pointing out them. The police are down
there, running around on the ground. We're like,
hey, man. Just die on the roof for
the rifle.
And the police were like, oh, what? You
know? Like, like, they didn't know what was
going on. You know, we're like, hey, Right
here on the roof, they can see from
right here. We see him that peace crawling.
And
next thing, you know? I'm like, I'm thinking
myself I'm like, why is Trump still speaking.
Why have they not pulled him up the
stage I'm standing there pointing at him for,
you know, 2 or 3 minutes, secret service
is looking at us from the top of
the barn. I'm pointing at that roof, just
standard it like this.
And next thing you know, 5 child right
out. So you'll you're almost sudden.
The shots came from that time hundred percent.
Hundred percent. And he... He was up there
for a couple of minutes. He was up
there we're not there a couple of them
minutes Absolutely. At least 3 to 4 minutes
and knew it's heading, yep, police in the
secret. We were telling the police. We were
pointing out for the secret service who were
looking at us. Jonathan barnes for they were
looking at us the whole time when already
stand about that truth. The thank for no
who they see? Probably not because the roof
the way that just slope when. He was
behind where they could see But but why
is there not frequent service on all of
these words here? I mean, this is not
a big place. Yeah. Did you see... I
mean, obviously, everyone when the shooting started, everyone
was Very panicked. Did you see what I'm
saying in at? Oh, yeah. Setup.
Okay. Sorry. Secret search blue okay. Just be
careful because well, we don't quite always watching.
But you're you're pretty sure they they they
shop the guy. Absolutely.
Okay. Yep. You you saw that happen. Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. So if that's the case, then
that's that my point about Laura Loom. Right?
That's... Then the guy in the crowd was
not that guy unless there was more than
1, which could be the case as well.
Always developing. There's just so many people that
love present the narrative that they think they
want to be the case because they're trying
to break the story without really being concerned
about whether it's in fact the full story
or there's more fact involved. Everyone's trying to
be the 1 that gets it out. You
know, It's just... That's part that's part of
the meeting for you? Yep. And did you
see them go to him afterwards.
So his ear clearly shows there. Somebody was
saying some... I don't wanna stick... That doesn't
seem me to be the... Somebody claiming out
there that it he took his ear off
apparently.
Pretty sure right there, you could just see
a ear.
Watch. Yep. Okay. Yep. And did you see
them go up to him afterwards this? Yeah.
Right there. So clearly, it looks is ears
bloody,
but, you know, the the point is he
has an ear. So if somebody's claiming the
ear is off, then that's not true. Tools.
They... Yeah. They crawled up on the roof.
They had their guns pointed out and make
sure he was dead. He was dead, And
that was it. It was ever.
It's incredibly. Think Yeah I was on the
roof right there. You can see the white
roof
right that you get a look at him.
Could you... Yeah. I mean, so think about
this, the implication. Assuming this is true, Please
be cautioned caught have caution with this. We
don't know. This could be. Every time these
happens, you always get these random side
conversations and sometimes they predict each other.
And and then Port always point out that,
you know, human memory is not as accurate
as accuracy pretend it is. People are constantly
incorrect even if they're being honest. But
seems to be that there's more people around
if that story is correct, and they all
saw it and he's simply saying, you know,
we were telling him, now why would nobody
have done anything about that? And he makes
a great point.
How in the world are you gonna let
this be completely open and un cons... You
know, when it overlook the crowd res speaking?
That's that's not what the secret service is
supposed to do.
So it's interesting. You know? Like, because said,
you know, Mean, again, leaning into the
conspiracy conversation, know what people don't want you
to talk about and ask questions about.
If that's the case, it does seem to
open up a bunch of conversation a bunch
of questions, You know?
Is this something that was manufactured? Was this
in it done to draw... You know, I...
It's questions to be had. And maybe without,
I mean, it's probably like the the where
the shot
where he was, The fact that the time
it took to to break this person down,
assuming this is correct.
And if they shot the guy and it
that wasn't immediately... Like, why was the report
then, else... I mean, the point is that
they were already
citing different people that were involved. Like, this
doesn't seem to add up. And it never
really does anymore. It does. There's a, all...
And that that doesn't always mean the story
we're getting as false. It just means that
it could be its false or it could
mean that there are other people inserting narratives
that are false, which confuses the conversation. A
lot of people. We just talked about.
I no. Other than he was in
muted colors, hand type clothing.
We saw the rifle fooling around as you...
That's a good point as well that no.
I am just pointing the chat.
So we're... If that's the case, I guarantee
1 of those people film that.
If that doesn't come out, it'll make me
wonder whether that was real. Think about that.
Everybody, the smallest thing in the world happens
and sick people pull the phone out today.
Phones out. So if that was happening, and
you guys are like, look, there's a guy
with a gun in the roof and you're
all pointing at him, somebody would have filmed
that.
So let's let's wait and see. I was
trying to crawl. I mean, we saw a
rifle hundred percent. You... I mean, you know
about college? You know Connor... Weapon it will
follow absolutely. You know about comments for sure.
You know I mean, there is a rifle
of some sort. I wouldn't know, you know,
I wasn't close enough to read the label
on another I might else to do... There
was a rifle of some sort. Yeah. Absolutely.
So what what do you how do you
process what you just seen.
But
I I don't know what to say, man.
I tell you is, you know,
if I if I walked up close to
there, with anything that can... Secret servers considered
AAA
problem.
I wouldn't be saying her talking to you
right now. Right. I don't know why A
guy that we're standing their point now to
police and secret service is crawling up the
roof. Now, you know, obviously, I didn't get
to finish. Obviously, the other side of that
point, would be from this some the... What
I think is probably gonna be more of
a popular perspective from the right is that
somebody tries to take them out.
For like a like a jfk scenario, right?
Where you've got people within the secret service
that allowed that to happen. That... I mean,
that right there with what he's saying, seems
like the most likely possibility.
Right? Is that clearly,
if that's the truth, it does seem very
inconsistent with what you'd expect from secret service.
Especially like his... The main thing he said
I think is most relevant would be not
that they would immediately grab the guy or
least tried to that they would very first
thing,
make sure somebody on stage got him out
of the way.
Immediately. You, you know, a balloon pops lot
of people, you know, the point is that's
usually the reaction you get. Something's off,
you take the... You just in case. Then
out of the way, we'll figure it out.
Interesting.
Yes. We're right there by that tree.
We were outside the security government. But
my question is,
there's something a few buildings around here? Why
is C for service not on every building.
Here was a whole bunch of questions. I
think they're gonna come. There's a whole bunch
of questions.
Yeah?
Yes. She was waiting front of me. She
kept going that's so funny. Oh, does somebody
else has a question?
There's only a few buildings around here? Why
is Secret service not at every building.
Here. It was a whole bunch of questions.
I think they're gonna come. There's a whole
bunch of questions.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah. Somebody... I thought... I thought he
just... Show, whole bunch of questions, then gap.
No silence. I thought it was just lacked.
Somebody else asked a question you can't really
hear what she's asking. Yes. She was right
in front of me. She kept going back
before he's right in front of me. Yes.
Service not every building here. There's was a
whole bunch of questions. I think they're gonna
come. There's a whole bunch of questions.
Yeah
Yes. She was right in front of me.
She kept on back and forth right in
front of me. Yes. And about a Trump...
Woman with the Trump flag. I can't really
hear it.
Because about
I mean, nice orders, nice lady running with
a flag.
Seem very,
you know, patriotic, but what what's what's significance
of the... No. She's just... He asked me
if saw say.
The horse. Sorry do you have to witness
this that. Why would you ask that? That's
a strange question? Terrible thing. And
stay safe for you other the family and
Thanks for Man.
Very interesting. Yeah I mean, and by the
way, you guys know we're saving all unless
Download all this stuff. So usually, these things
tend to kind of, you know, disappear.
Thanks very interesting.
So that 1, you know, I'm glad we
played it only because
just my gut tells me that seems like
a pretty genuine exchange.
But, you know, that doesn't mean it's real.
That they're like, I I... There's plenty of
things that I first instinct turn out to
be wrong. You know, And the point is
here,
It's... I I I'm reluctant to ever do
this because it... You just never know what
this is... You know, it's important to flush
this stuff out, which sadly, multiple people don't
do anymore. But I do think this important.
Alright. Let me get back to where...
So keep me, let me. I mean, we're
gonna... This show is gonna be... Following up
on
information tomorrow. So let me know if you
guys see any more information. We'll definitely try
to jump up and cover it.
Here's another 1 that somebody sent me.
Let's see.
This from the new York post.
Gunman behind attempted assassination on Trump shot and
killed by secret service
sources.
Wonder... Don't wonder who they're citing with that.
Let's see.
Oh, man. Really? Is that all it was?
Just a headline and some images. That's notoriously...
Here we go. The gunman believed to have
been behind this assassination, a champion and president
Trump was shot and killed a secret service.
The shooter identified as a Chinese man. See,
see how this works guys, and where this
1.
That is not a Chinese man. I mean,
unless I'm just not able to see through
the glasses in the meeting.
Very interesting. Oh, damn. I just put this
on the hold on.
There we go.
Trying to make sure I save all these
2.
Okay.
So now that doesn't mean it is Chinese
band. Mind you. New York post is not
incredibly reliable and on top of that. This
is what tends to happen. Now, of course,
you get the argument that they're gonna... From
the right, it's gonna be usually without anything
to prove that. Same with the left. They
would say, well, that's saying Chinese man to
cover up the fact that it was Antifa
or whatever, which I... You know... That's always
you get from somebody, but make sure we
can prove these things. Saying wasn't in a
sniper position located hundreds of yards away. Look
at that. So that that at least through
New York post confirms what that guy just
said. As he spoke to a campaign crowds
sources said.
Here's just some images see now. So who
is this guy then? I imagine that's piercing
the crowd. Okay. So this turns it all
around. Right? This was so funny. I'm so
glad I made that point about Laura Because
clearly, she's misleading people even with her suggestion.
So the point is that based don't we
know. So that they're reporting anyway, based let's
just say based on what the current information
flow is,
the person as Ne york post is now
saying, and it... That aligns with what the
guy said was shot from the roof toward
him speaking. Right? And then that's why this
guy likely got shot behind him, which does
make sense then. Because the first thing we
said is it'd be weird. Nobody else got
shot.
And so this is the person that carrying
out. They also said it possibly 1 other
person.
Suspect... No, it does say a suspect being
removed.
It's interesting. But I guess that just means
anybody's a suspect at this point.
Shot holding his ear.
Sir secret service. Let's see.
Yep. There's a clean shot of his ears.
So clearly his ear is still there. Man.
Like,
how is... Where's is he's bleeding? I don't
see any...
His ear seems full. That's interesting.
That's his whole ear. I can see english,
I think. But I guess it could just
nick the side of his ear lobe. I
mean, the thing think that's either or his
ear cartilage.
Very lucky if that's what happened.
Guy must have been a bad shot.
They declared Assassin was neutralized.
Trump raising his fist. Okay. Bullets rang out
the meet... In the middle of the remarks.
Trump putting his hand.
Whose ear. We already know this?
He came with an inches of having his
face shot open.
Nope, that's so far.
Oops. Getting all mixed up where everything is
here. Hold on.
Alright. Anything else that you guys think we
should discuss I'll leave it there for now.
This is interesting. It is. I mean, it's
it's peaking my interest. There's definitely some interesting
overlaps of this.
But I think that, you know, there's indications
that it might not be exactly what it
looks like. And I don't mean it's happen.
I think so far it's pretty clear that
it did unless something else changes.
Somebody simply saying that... I don't know if
that's accurate, But so interestingly,
I'm we're gonna look into this more. For
sure.
So let's see where we can kind of
leave this then. I wanna talk about the
West Bank.
Let me finish this since this is what
we were talking about.
So here's where we were before. So bringing
it back to A
And the bombing of the safe zones.
Bm,
and anti Zion hebrew highlights this, and this
is from Israeli Media.
And again, I apologize for the dis joint
way of the show today just for those
that maybe don't care about 1 or the
other Apologize, but that's just, you know, it's
breaking stuff.
The idea decided not to take any chances
they reported in Hebrew media. I easier Israeli
media and a number of fighter jets went
on a wide bombing campaign. That included dropping
tens of tons of bombs,
from the fighter jets. The planes crushed the
entire tent complex and annihilate the entire area
were Da and his people were.
That's the guy they're claiming that they got.
Right? So
what they're reporting and this could just be
israeli media b... You know, beef up with
so, you know, we... We bombed everybody which
a lot of this israelis wanna hear, even
though there's people there. But I do believe
this is what they're doing and this seems
to lineup up. What we've seen before. So
what they're reporting to their own people in
Israel is that they, like, almost out of
caution to make sure they got them, which
it clear it seems like they didn't bombed
widely with tens of
tens of tons of bombs, So somewhere whether
that's, you know,
20 plus 500 pound bombs, and that's also
the point to make.
Just because they go, well, those big ones
shouldn't be used, will they just use twice
as many.
United it's such a stupid game. Their bombs
kill people.
But so I'm... That's an important report right
here because he's clearly highlighting that they are
claiming that they bombed and, which is what
they do.
Now, Ram abdul from europe making group makes
the point that's very important, and this is
easy to prove.
This is perhaps the sixteenth
time.
Israel has claimed the target of its massacres
was
Muhammad Da, for Death.
With every large scale massacre resulting in dozens
or hundreds sicilian casualties, Israel justifies it by
claiming it targeted a high ranking leader. Only
for us to later discover the false suit
of their claim. Hundreds It doesn't matter. Because
the Us government goes along anyway. Very sad.
People that are being pulled out of the
buried area, the rubble, a child just came
out of the ground. Right.
My god.
Suppressed news is highlighting hebrew media coverage of
this, saying their source is claiming 5 heavy
bombs weighing 1 ton were used, which, you
know, different than what we're In that media,
but his point here is the same as
that they're seeming all their reports seem to
be all over the place, which pretty much
the indicates what corporate media is. And just
seeing like, our Us media, they're lying in
the interest of what they want to accomplish
is most likely the case. Foreign minister Katz
directs the activation of its ongoing operations room,
Like and and and the Bombing of Con
and orders the preparation of a formula for
the Israeli narrative who presented to countries and...
And international governments to defend the Army's operation.
Showing you that their... The whole point is
to present the narrative that benefits them and
what they're doing. That's how's Barr aura for
you. Her highlights that Israel has attempted to
assassinate. That I 7 times, and each time
you survive. During calm periods in normal circumstances,
he behaves like a wanted man and stayed
away from routine live people.
Sorry you, they claimed to try to kill
them many times.
Channel 13. We did not inform United States.
In advance of the attack. That says something.
10:14 says after about an hour, there will
be the assessment of the situation and the
security apparatus where it it's expected that the
picture will become clear regarding Con unit's operation.
All that means in my opinion is they're
formulating the narrative they want you to tell.
Here is what
My
Highlights that says about this in regard to
which the idea that they should've have just
been
backing, like, why were they there still They
should be out of the way Let's realize
there's 2 points to this as she highlights.
1,
This was a safe zone.
Nobody was... I mean, even if they did
drop leaflets last second at the point is
they were told they were supposed to be
there too, there's nowhere else to go. They're
bombing
everywhere.
That's not if that's an easily identifiable fact.
Close to 800000
Palestinian
still in North Pe
suffering from intentional
starvation denial of water,
medical facilities and anything that sustain human life.
And again, what Israel's is doing is not
trying to evacuate, it is creating a state
of chaos.
Because as it threw the leaflets in the
north, telling Palestinians to evacuate,
these starved Palestinians
physically unable. They were bombing the south at
the same exact time,
where in the South Palestinians where we're removing
bodies from from buildings and some are still
stuck under the rubble. So again, it's it's
not really evacuation. Evacuate where the entire script
is a slaughter house.
Marion, what is then,
the situation for people who find themselves having
to evacuate.
In Gaza at the moment if they're even
able to.
They're not... They're sleeping in the streets. They're
carrying backpacks.
That that barely have any essentials for survival,
and you need to understand that the way
Israel is bombing
Again, it is... Has neither precision nor strategy,
what it is actually doing is carpet bombing,
palestinians.
And that means throwing several 4000
pound bombs
across an entire street. So so the people
are in a state of fright
Can you...
There are people that can't run there are
people that aren't injured. We saw the medical
journal the lancet. By the way, unless I'm
mistaken, which is certainly pop. Lot of expert.
I think she just miss mistook, which is
at 4000. But either way, we're talking about,
you know, many ton bombs being used, which,
you know, whether they're
know it's an explosive guys, That's the bottom
line. You're using bombs where children are dying.
That's all You need to understand. It's estimating
that nearly a hundred and 86000
Palestinians
may have been killed as a result of
Israel's military aggression on that... Another point to
make your guys, and I'm not even suggesting
that this is why. Certainly could be anything
possible, but that's not what I'm suggesting.
That this is gonna be eclipse by this
conversation.
This massacre took place today or any number
of other very important things happening are gonna
be completely eclipse by the coverage of what
happened to Trump, which is an important story.
But he's alive. Right? His ear got Nick.
You could argue it's important for what happened
than, you know, what's gonna happen because of
it. But is that arguably more important than
a hundred and 30 people being killed by
Us bombs and got, I mean, it's that's
for you to decide. But just recognize that
that is going to be eclipse
by, you know, this story will take over
everything for quite a while now.
Right. You... Y'all all know that. That's it.
No, sorry. I myself stop at the end.
So here,
finishing out this segment, which unfortunately does look
like not have to cut it shorter than
I thought. But Kenneth Roth highlights. What Abby
Martin has been highlighting,
for the longer than anybody, which we've covered
many times as well, whether we're talking about
the s or the butterfly bullets or what
the
illegal
equipment that they use.
Munitions or the white you pho first, they
use on a regular basis. The human rights
groups have covered 45 times.
Nobody helps people accountable. It's unbelievable.
Is really made weapons designed to spray, high
levels of s are causing horrific injuries to
civilians in Gaza? That's the guardian writing that.
The point being is that they're not just
using
gigantic
ton bombs that are murdering people that even
biden claims they shouldn't be using, they're also
using Israeli made weapons. So ask yourself why
they're needing your weapons and then selling some
anyway, which we already covered,
we're being we're being manipulated, guys as a
country. At the point,
they're using their weapons as well that are
you... They're making their spraying s. How are
you gonna pretend? Some kind of pinpoint targeting
of us, which I don't anybody that's honestly
believing that at this point. But all this
shows you. They're using weapons that are designed
to maximize
suffering and pain to anybody in a very
wide area when they know like, I'll put
it this way.
The Jab refugee can. A rod. These places
where they bombed and killed hundreds of people
that they knew they were gonna kill because
they claimed they're were going after 1 guy.
Same thing here.
That would they didn't even get or maybe
not.
The point is if you're gonna do that,
and you know and you're trying to act
like this 4 Lauren hero that well. We
had to get the bad guy and now
human shields and all that? Okay, Then why
are you using weapons to spray S.
The guarantee you're gonna kill a lot of
innocent people.
Because they want to.
They'll not pretend like, that's not a conscious
choice. This is designed to maximize suffering of
civilians. That's the point
especially children they write. The guardian says foreign
insurgents in Gaza.
The weapons caused, quote, many of the death
amp patients and life changing wounds to children,
which again is exactly why they do it.
And here are some images for you. It's
Showing you the kind of things they put
in this and showing you little pieces of
s that end up inside the body, which
cause other problems and that's the point.
For all, we know they're dipping this stuff.
And I mean this is it's a joke
by the way, in in in something that
then guarantees you're gonna end up having an
infection.
Like this is what we saw the, oz
movement dipping their bolts in fat in pig
fat, which I guarantee is gonna go bad
and it's gonna make people sick on top
of the they were shooting Muslims, different conversation,
I mean,
it's just unbelievable.
Back
According to the Guardian, the deciding foreign insurgents
who work there, Israel weapons designed to disperse
high levels of s are inflict severe injuries
on civilians.
Particularly children.
These are volunteer through doctors, now some of
which aren't from Palestine.
Now on top of the Ado bombing,
you know, the current 1?
Doctor Omar Solomon,
highlights this other attack.
The videos are too gruesome to share, Israel
had already destroyed the mosque that I'll shot
your refugee camp, They... So they bombed the
people praying on the rug outside the mosque.
Limbs and blood everywhere. Just just very sad
image of some shoes, on the mat, the
blood,
Now here is a video.
Yes. It is graphic. I think it's important
to see what happened.
Cuts news highlights they bombed while we were
praying or bombed us while praying.
Here's the scene
from the All shot the refugee camp in
Gaza city.
Could possibly
That's enough.
My god.
There is no way to justify that.
And by the way, I've shown you videos
over the last
decade half,
where they will shoot get tear your gas
and people praying, well they will beat people
storm, I'll ask them, I'll ask some mosque
and shoot people with rubber bullets while they're
praying, or real ammunition in some cases.
Not new. It's not new.
Now while that's happening,
every single time by the way. Now, these
first ones are from the eleventh. So this...
I mean, by the way every single day
we have these events they try to cover
up. My point is as this stuff happens
what do they do? They roll out the
same tire narratives.
Okay. We know as a matter of fact
at this point that the United States, Canada
and other you entity... Entities that are clearly
still supporting israel. Have been forced to come
out and say, you have not presented any
evidence to prove Un was
part of October seventh, or in any way
all with a moss.
That's to say that that's not the case.
It's just to say that they have not
presented any evidence. That was as of, like
a month ago.
The Un as the same thing, but of
course, the Is Us, so we ignore it.
Right?
But here we are again. As of the
eleventh. This... The pretend human rights lawyer, the
Art Or Trotsky says, as we have repeatedly
said, Has become an enter ins inseparable part
instinct indistinguishable arm of a mosque.
And I know remember don't forget, they have
a a plan. They've outlined already about how
they were gonna systematically destroy Genre, not because
some Homo hamas allegation. Because they needed to
get rid of Amr because they were the
ones to keeping track of the right of
return and where they were supposed to go
back to and that's a central part of
the lie they're telling. But that this isn't
the reality that they don't have a right
to the land, but they do. And that's
why they're trying to cover it up.
But this is part of that plan to
make it go away.
And guess what they're pointing to. Look, Fox
news.
Under employees who work as terrorist operatives asked
for their dismissal, is real says.
Oh, cool. So Arson says, look, we told
you.
We told you what Fox is reporting that
Israel close to say.
Look at that little round circular logic. So
Israel, who has no more evidence who's simply
going these people are part of Hu hamas
who are part of Un that have... That
every single time turns out to be false.
Fam fabricated or they're not even presenting evidence,
just narrative every time so far.
This time as well.
And what do they do? They go look
at these people they're the ones and fox
du follows too.
Because journalism. Right?
And I said they just recycle the same
lies over and over and thought plays a
winning role in this lie because Israel says.
Great journalism. They do this as usual to
cover a massacre like the ones
like the ones like the 1 like linked,
damn linked below, getting a lot of attention.
I never wrote liked an accident.
Oh, I think it's
Oh, I... I'll, I'll put the link right
there.
And I think... And then, I thought that
was just the link showing you what just
happened today. Now on top of that on
the twelfth the next day, we got the
same old dumb narratives from israel.
Which, of course, certainly could be true, but
from a group that's already lied about every
1 of these and caught by people like
the even the corporate media, like Cnn, Bbc
crying loud.
Here we get another stupid video 13 seconds
long of a building that we can't identify,
and look, there's some things in the world
that say An, so it must be what
they say. Right?
Or
let me just shoot in the dark here,
a building that's no longer used for them
that's used by anybody else. First of all,
realize that it could be in number building.
It could be an under building that no
one's using anymore, and then they could come
in and place things on this table, because
all they show you is here's the room
and look their stuff on the table.
That's all you get. You know, like they
didn't bring guns in behind the Mr machine
or move them in in front of Bbc
that then caught them or bring in bak
cleaning medical supplies which turned out to be
other guns they placed in the room.
Yeah. That's not anything like that, or the
A shi room. It was supposed to be
the big masks room and it ended up
being coffee table things they put there.
My point is how in the world we
ever verify the things from people that have
been caught lying every time so far through
And we're supposed to... Like, this piece of
a drone on this table is supposed to
be indicative of a massive of massive
location. My point is that even if that
was actually in this room.
How are we supposed to know this is
a location that is in fact being used
by Un? Do you realize that Israel has
been bombing and attacking and destabilizing this area
for a really long time?
And removing resources,
the point is it certainly could be what
they're saying. And that even in and of
itself would that prove the things they keep
arguing.
You know how impossible it would be for
somebody within this area or this group even
to not be at some way overlap with
the group that was forced to be their
government because israel made that the case.
So if you wanted to be part of
a group, even if you didn't want any
part of a Moss, like An, you had
to work through Moss for a very long
time because Israel made that the case. And
then I turn around and say everybody some
us because they were forced to root the
government they put in place, that they funded.
It's just... It's painfully stupid. My point is
that all we get is this dumb video
and they just go see.
Hamas is Un un is Hamas. Therefore starve
everybody to death.
But this all comes out, and usually when
they wanna hide something else.
Oh, look, Eve Columbus. 1 of the classic
prop.
Here's what's interesting to me.
Much, the world needs to face the facts.
Oh, you mean this video, we can't verify
it. Those are your facts.
Exactly.
Does that's your facts. Whatever we say,
what's interesting to me. This random person online
is totally not part of the government, which
is not, but my point is they clearly
are in
working in tandem.
But she mission to the Un, but the
point is
07:14AM.
She posts this. Right?
Which just so happens to be 3 hours
before the state of Israel posted it.
Okay. So at leave K knew what was
going on before the government did,
something's fishy, I think. But either way, the
point is on top of that, and I'm...
This in my opinion is about what's going
on right now,
we get this every single time.
Every single time. The same old monster is
disgusting people reach out and go what about
the be children?
Who knows what's going on? And I'm I've
I've been making this point for a long
time?
I'm... I've who knows what the reality is
What I do know? Is that their father
publicly said they were killed by Id bombs
in this sad video to watch where he's
crying about it.
And I said a reminder, their father publicly
stated that they were killed by Bombing and
even the mainstream media which you can watch
here were forced to admit.
Worse yet, you verifiable know this, and yet
continue to exploit their memory for your agenda.
How disgusting can you be? Hashtag hannibal directive,
which is what this would be.
I mean, think about a gross that is,
guys know, yes, they were taken, which is
a crime. A mom should be held to
accountable for that. There's no way around that.
No. I mean, anybody pretending that's not a
crime is not be honest.
But what's worse is that they're ind bombing,
if not deliberate killed them according to their
father.
And now they keep pretending that's not the
case because they use them.
They've been a central role in their propaganda
campaign from the very first week. And now
every time they need to kind of draw
and outrage or distract you from what they
did to other children. They go look at
these kids every time, and same thing of
Aviv columbus did the next day.
Why is the child being held hostage? Why
is the child? Says, showing the Be child.
And I said the same thing, But somebody
else said.
The terrible truth behind warren and terror said,
the level of moral d legitimacy it takes
to post this is simply incomprehensible.
To be audacious an audacious enough, as well
as so profoundly bankrupt ethically at and Morally
to even utter a word about this child.
When thousands of Innocent policy and children up
been barb barrack
want.
Her horrendous... Excuse me. Horrendous killed.
Disfigured and or psychologically brutal.
By what they've seen and who they've lost
is stu.
To cause zion of cancer is an egregious
front to cancer itself.
Well put.
And again, Just like I just said the
same thing.
They know. I know they know. I... They've
tag them. They post it. And other people
do too, It was a major story.
So that and think about that. They are
knowing pretending this person is alive. In order
to emotionally manipulate those that they wanna lie
to.
Of Evo accomplished as a monster for that
reasonable alone.
So too is orange. So too is Elon
Levy, all the rest of these monster pliers.
Now I was gonna talk about Cease ceasefire.
We already made that clear. I think many
times, the rest of these points we can
get to later. The lie about the pier,
which is a really embarrassing video.
20 days it was operational. She just tries
to, like, morally shout them down and be
like, feeding people is good no matter what?
Like, it's so stupid. That's not exactly what
she said. But the point is, clearly,
they failed. And orally, they achieved in the
agenda, which was using the peer
execute some agenda Israel. But pretending they fed
people while they saved they feeding people that
were starving, the point is food that they
were bringing dropped dramatically as a whole while
that peer was active.
What they actually did was through that illusion
fed them less
their liars as usual.
This as well, we'll talk about this probably
next. So just about other things that are
going on in regard to the atrocities taking
place.
And unfortunately,
just don't... I don't have the time to
do this properly. I'm gonna I'm gonna I...
I'm... Don't know if I'll be beginning to
a show tomorrow. I'm gonna try.
Because But if not, like I said the
last time, And this this is not necessarily
an immediately time sensitive topic, but I will
be... I wanna make a... I wanna take
time to talk about the West bank alternatively.
About what's going on there. It's important, and
I wanna read through this. So I'm gonna
probably just wrap here,
I wanna tell you though just in general
that just recognize that... What's going on in
the West bank is g task.
It's not getting much attention with the settlers
alone,
raping, pill,
tearing houses down, burning people alive,
And then it's top of that you got
people in the government
carrying houses down and making the pay for,
which has been happening for decades.
And even their own government is calling it
out,
highlighting this as a problem, saying what you're
doing is is
terrorism.
A lot of important stuff in here. I
mean, we have the seller leader herself. This
woman here.
Openly admitting this.
Saying, look,
we don't want a palestinian state and the
more illegal settlements you make makes that less
likely. It's pretty simple.
On the surface,
and smoke rich and Ben everybody supports this.
Now 1 that I really looking forward to
talking about which we will. And again, I
want more time on this,
Sm has completed Israel's annexation of the West
Bank.
Just to read the first few paragraphs, a
few days ago, this is from the eleventh
by the way.
Britain by Hr rats for the podcast,
the constitutional revolution was completed a few days
ago, but no,
not Israel they say.
Few were aware of it, but the V
smoke which Netanyahu government has conspired to carry
out 2 coup.
1 in israel
and the other in the West Bank.
The first is aimed at eliminating the separation
of powers and the independence of the judiciary.
Remember that,
the whole screening point about how they have
an independent judiciary. Therefore, the Icc has no
no
jurisdiction here.
I made the major point that showed you
that that's been the ba been the case
for a long time.
And now you got Hr and their own
people going vip they they solidify solidified it
even more.
They already did this.
There's no longer the separation of the power
being the independent of the the just... Judiciary
is no longer independent. It wasn't for a
long time. So there goes their lot... Their
argument, but they don't care because that was
just a narrative anyway. But the first was
removing their independent... The eliminating day the separation
of powers and the independence of the year...
Judiciary, excuse me and creating
He goes on a dictatorship in israel, which
is the reality.
But blink biden in the rest, they've been...
They've known that it's been that the whole
time is aborted. They don't care. They just
wanna lie to you to make use support
them. When it goes the second seeks to
Annex the West Bank and perpetuate Jewish a
supremacy as a guiding principle there. In order
to prevent the first from happening, hundreds of
thousands of Israelis went to the streets.
Right? But care about israel.
But no 1 did the same to stop
the second.
He writes because what's wrong with some more
jewish supremacy.
He's he's critical, Also that's always he's driving
that.
Very important. Think about a wild that is
you say somewhere else you're racist,
but that's what Saying because that's what's happening.
I we'll talk about this more.
72 percent Think Netanyahu was resign, but the
point is that Netanyahu is not the problem.
He's part of it. But it's something much
deeper than that.
I really hope that people can begin to
or further continue to...
Find the courage to not be wishy washy
you about these things. If you could prove
something prove, talk about it. Don't be cow
along by accusations of things that you know
are not true.
It's it's how they control these conversations. Not
just anybody, whether Zion or Us government or
any other narrative we're talking about or entity
we're talking about.
The idea of trying to put you in
a box and highlight you as something you're
not.
And that that happens a 2 party illusion
every moment.
Is a way to control what you care
about and what you say. And that's what
the parties are all about anyway, keeping you
aligned with what you think you're supposed to
be saying or doing and omit things they're
uncomfortable for the party. It's just like people
do a broader sense with the government in
general. We're not supposed to say this because
that makes us America look bad. Is it
the truth?
Then say it. What are we... What are
we worried about it? We're if the truth
is the problem then maybe you're in the
wrong path?
Something simple.
But thank you for tuning in today, guys.
Now, obviously, this a little dis disappointed because
of what happened on that, but I'm... I
think it was important to cover that. And
and it this will... I'm sure flush out
it goes forward. So send me what you
think is important. I'm gonna... Like I said
try to do a show tomorrow, but if
not, the next day, and we'll make sure
we continue to follow up on this.
But the main things we cover today as
always, Ga
Twitter,
the lie of the 2 party illusion, and
how people are will omit this major part
of the story, just it's comic stupid it's
cartoon ish.
And the idea that Israel is continuing to
bomb the safe zones. The major 2 points
we covered today.
It's undeniable.
If you care about these things then stand
up, do something about it. You can continue
to support this platform if you believe,
we'll get continue fight for you.
I love you all. As always question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.