I'm a computer programmer.
Mister Curtis are there programs that can be
used to secretly fix elections. Yes. How do
you know that be the case?
Because in October of 2000, I wrote a
prototype
for present Congressman tom Bin,
at the company I worked for in Avi
veto, Florida that did just that.
And when you say did did just that.
It would rig an election? It would flip
the about 51 49.
The whoever you wanted to go to and
whichever race you wanted to win. And would
that program that you designed be something that
election officials that might be on county boards
of elections could detect. They never see it.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Tuesday, 07/09/2024.
Thank you for joining me today. Well, we're
gonna have another 1 of our kinda stereotypical
T lab,
irritate everybody in the paradigm type of show
today. So we're gonna dive into something, a
focal point today.
Something that relates to the voting
conversation, which I'll make some points about. That's
why I open with that clip just to...
There's a lot of conversation, a lot of
data and information other than just that video
around the obvious manipulation outside of voter fraud
odd, voter manipulation. That takes place every year.
The same machines we're using last year into
this year. It's it's a very obvious conversation.
But I wanted to start with that, so
we kinda planted that under minds.
When we talk about the save act, which
I just made a point about interestingly commented
on the superficial reading of what was involved
with that
around
what Elon Musk had to say about it,
which I'll reference again today in regards to
just division and and, you know, just 2
party politics.
But somebody reached out to me, and I'm
realizing right as I'm saying this that I've
frustrating
forgot to grab their tweet. I want... I
I wanted to go through and give him
a shout out. I'll be sure in the
next show to include who it was. It's
buried in links that I didn't go into
today because I was stuff involved around israel
and stuff will get into in the next
show, including by the way the West Banks.
Which I'm gonna put off until the next
show I mentioned at the end of Last
show.
But I wanted to give a shout up
because they reached out to me and said,
hey, have you thought about the digital Id
aspect of this discussion. And I'm not... Was
kinda surprised that moment. I'm like, I can't
believe I didn't
immediately think that's 1 of the possible overlaps
because that's usually where remind goes.
And so I decided today to go through
this.
Was
not surprised at all to to find out
very quickly
that there's obvious
undeniable connections
between what's being pushed in the save act,
and and I'll I'll make... I'll reiterate my
points from yesterday
or the day before yesterday,
where I argue... There's very clear reasons why
ensuring that only citizens vote make makes perfect
sense. That is unless you disagree with law
and that's a different conversation. But that is
the law, and that does make sense as
long as there's no
action around it. What I'm seeing
is not some Democrat Republican back and forth.
It's your government in my opinion using this
as a c tool or rather I would
even say cor. Using this as a way
to
implant the the groundwork as many of other
things happen during Covid 19 and well past
that for the next step. Now you tell
me, III... As always,
want you to disagree with me. I want
you to come to your own conclusions about
this and I want you to come, look
at what I'm laying out at the very
least to consider at all and just ask
whether you think this is something other than
what it looks like. And maybe even both
maybe there isn't a genuine effort to justify
voter registration, you know, in regard to
citizenship and location of birth,
but there's also something else going on. And
I think this is undeniable. The connection of
the Save act
very clearly 1 of the listings and we'll
go through the 5 options and why it's
pretty clear that the 1 that makes the
the 1 that it's being driven into, and
we'll go through what the passport driver's license
birth certificate conversation is the real Id in
caps, the real act, real Id,
compatible,
compliant,
ide
identification. And this comes from the real
Id actively believe saying that correctly from 2005,
which has been postponed.
Year after year, decade after decade until now
20 25,
and we'll get into all why of all
this is very important.
And it's interesting that it's been pushed off,
and you'll find no question.
Weirdly almost try to kind of cover this
connection up deleting websites, old post being removed,
both from high level groups, world economic forum
and so on with the Id 20 20.
Conversation. Real Id as far as I can
tell Simply being a part of the Id
20 20 direction alliance, and that if you
forgot already, had to do with digital passports,
immunity passports.
Simply, whatever the narrative around it was, it
was Id,
digital identification, and through that,
you know, control, not even necessarily in a
negative way, but I always see this negative
way, but just control of that conversation through
those mechanisms for your safety.
For biometric security for saving yourself from deadly
pathogens, whatever the narrative is. All of it
was going through the same conversation, and let's
not forget. There was a person who
left the company in protest,
saying that this is not even about security
or safety in fact it's threatening both. She
called it techno
during Covid 19.
Now My I point laying all of this
out is that I un uncomfortable came to
the conclusion with the connections you can see
that what we're seeing in this
act is simply using 2 party politics as
it happens to both sides. The left and
the right, whatever it ends up being in
the moment, what's necessary. Using this wedge issue
to drive them to support what they would
otherwise not.
And this is the set... This is... In
this case, it's not necessarily Id conversations. We've
had this a lot in the 2 party
illusion. But from the first... The the side
of it that
Republicans, I would argue would be much more
resistant to the idea of digital Ids,
of any other type of kind of biometric
overlap, and that's where we're... That's where we're
at, and I believe that's what's happening. Is
if you got people that are now pointing
to the logical part of this,
And
un winning, I think to a large degree
other than the larger people at the top
of this that I'm very sure know what's
going on.
Falling into a 2 party illusion trap. While,
they think they're fighting for something they support.
They're being manipulated into supporting something for the
agenda. And this is the same conversation we
had,
there's, I mean, it's constant, and it's on
both sides of the paradigm. The 1 that
I remember just most recently was the idea
of using... I mean, there's a lot of.
The trans second amendment conversation from the right
attacking that they're right to have a gun
before it was shown up being infringe, or
right now with israel. All of a sudden
people screaming about woke cancel culture, suddenly screaming
that these people don't have a right to
say what they're saying. And the the ones
that walked around campus talking about how that
couldn't be allowed. Are the ones in some
cases now calling for censorship, and it's the
same dynamic. We see it all over the
place.
So we're gonna go through this. We're gonna
start with the conversation of Id 20 20,
going through Covid 19 and before. So you
understand what this really is and where these
connect.
And we're gonna talk about then. I... The
the real Id I... Id 20 20 overlap.
I I believe that's how I had it
lined up. And then
Right. And then we're gonna talk about the
actual bill, the save act and discuss
how that's overlap with the real Id conversation,
then discuss the
breakdown of why it seems pretty clear that
this was, you know, meant to leave it
as I said just the other day. It
seems like there's plenty of options and people
can... You know, but Remembering in the conversation
of the Id issue around older voters and
so on as much as that may be
something certain political leaning people wanted to dismiss
because It's all a big scam to get
illegal immigrants into vote, which certainly is something
going on. I'm sure. But this game that's
played about how this is the only thing
that these are reasonably smaller issues in the
larger realm of your governments
cheating and stealing and manipulating the election. Which
you could argue the illegal immigrant side of
this is 1 part of it. I do
think there is an element of that. But
I don't think this is really what it's
about when it comes to justifying that and
using these to suppress
and and manipulate our perceptions around the larger
conversation. And I think what we're seeing in
all of these in every single 1 of
these aspects is these wedge issues that use
that, you know, that blind people from a
partisan perspective.
And
there was another point was gonna make. I
lost it in any case. Let's let's start
with.
Thought that was important.
Yeah. We'll get into it. There's a lot
there's was just a lot of overlapping points.
And I think... Oh, that I... Oh, that's
what it was. I'm glad I remembered about
the Id part of it and the older
voters and so on is that you get
this reflects a pushback to say, well, that's
just AAA narrative to to to hide the
fact that they're bringing in as many illegal
as they can to change the voting outcome.
Now that's why I started with the Clint
K point to be honest.
I'm not even gonna get into the obvious
elephant in the room that I don't think
your vote translates to the outcome. I've said
in a million times. We will be talking
about it more coming the election, but it
has to buy on play on your mind
here. Because that's a huge part this. If
you think it's all about getting a illegal
votes, well that has to mean that the
vote translates, which means they're just going please
vote for me.
Do we really still think that's how this
plays out with all of the overlapping 2
party illusion agendas that global as I mean,
it's it's just kinda crazy and Naive even
in my opinion. But back to the point
about the Id discussion,
there is an overlap there that seems that
they're trying to make it look as if
there's lots of different choices But it's the
same conversation that there are people that might
be involved. And again, this is the point
for those that think the vote translates
that might not be able to vote.
Even if it's an Id conversation because they're
older and then, but, again, my point to
be on the other side of the spectrum,
it's a small percentage, but it should still
matter. We should care about illegal immigrants voting
in regard to the outcome of the election
if you think that's the case in regard
to voting, then, yes, That's a matters, but
smaller, and the same thing on the other
side is that you got older people or
certain parts of the country that don't have
the Ids or don't have their birth certificate
it matters. You can't say either doesn't matter,
but they're smaller. When you come to the
point about, governments lying about Russia stealing elections
or literally stealing votes in lot with machine,
and we're talking about both sides here, all
of your government. So I think that's super
important as we go through the bill and
end with a little bit of overlap that
comes to the idea of Covid 19, Donald
Trump, Black rock and kind of where all
of this seems to can... I mean, it's
it never stops. And it's not even just
from the points we're gonna make today. This
is just where I can see the most
information. This has been happening a really long
time. In regard to and I'll always come
out now and say 1 point that somebody
points out at the end, which I'll get
them credit for at the end of the
show
around
19 18,
Kansas flu, which technically we should all understand
by now if you know the information even
as you look this up on textbooks and
Wikipedia,
the the the Spanish flu started in Kansas,
and it was the military general Persian, kind
of conversation where they knew this. They forced
it in any way, caused this to spread.
They they blamed it on Span. Our Spain
was the first group to speak up, which
is why I got labeled Spanish flu. Same
with Wuhan flu. We should all know by
now. That's not actually what happened, but we're
gonna go China flu from the republican side
at least. My point is that that was
how that all started then. It was all
kind of a manipulation in a lot of
other ways. The point is that 19 18
was when it officially became policy to to
to basically require a passport.
They existed before that, But from that point
forward, it was required.
No, you may not think that sounds crazy
now. We've been used to it for everyone
a long time. But if you're talking about
freedom and Liberty.
I get it. There's a level of security
in regard to, you know, where are you
from and what's going? We all kind of
we've been ingrained with these.
But what's the difference about being concerned about
the next step? If you think that one's
okay.
I'll tell you my opinion as we go
through this, but I think what's interesting is
that even a passport conversation. There's a level
that whether you agree with it or not.
And even I will argue there's a level
of understanding there, but it's still the point
to be made is that still a restriction
of liberty.
Free movement.
Whether it's something you agree with or not.
And I think there's an an abuse around
that, we've seen the Tsa and all these
biometric scans. I mean, it's that's what that's
built on.
Same with 09:11 and the shoe bomb and
all these... Things we've proven today are not
what they appear to be. So just keeping
all that in mind, let's walk into what
I think is than at 1 of these
next steps to slowly using wedge issues and
distraction, get you
not just accepting
digital Ids, but haven't you call for them.
This is what we need because all those
illegal immigrants are gonna vote and this, you
know, whatever it is. And this is again,
just a 1 side part of this because
right now, it's that's how it's framed. Don't
forget the Teeter To of conversation that goes
on over decades and different administrations. If those
of us that are outside the 2 party
illusion or at least think we can see
through it.
You see that. You see the bigger picture
of how it os between the craziness on
either side, but it's it's it's not very
rarely both sides, but right now,
It's being framed as the right... The rad
put it this way. The right is being
more manipulated around how this goes forward, just
like during Covid 19, it was the reverse
in of my opinion. It's not that long
ago.
So let's start
with a point around Twitter.
Because there's interesting overlap all this around Twitter
as well, and we're actually gonna start with
a point
that is
about censorship
not necessarily because it completely relates, but I
wanted to highlight this. There's a whole a
lot that I pulled off that I had
lined up today that we'll talk about the
next show around a lot of different things.
But this was 1 of the remnants that
I kinda felt overlap, and we're to go
talk about that into Twitter because Twitter don't
forget is a huge player in. So... Not
even just comment about this, which just just
still blows me away. But
Id verification. Id in general.
If we can't see right now that Twitter
is drives dragging people that don't would know...
I mean, many people that are fighting this
thing, in some ways compromising because they wanna
be part of Twitter. They wanna get to
read. They wanna get verification. They wanna get
money. Hopefully, all of us in this channel
in this platform are saying, no. Thank you.
But we always at saw auto tic or
out, excuse the authentic... Authentic or whatever they
call it. The Israeli platform that was aggressively
scoop up all your biometrics until they were
like, oh, everyone sees it. Never mind. Now
we're gonna go stripe. Like that's any better.
All these different weird overlaps.
The
techno knock the great reset overlaps. Elon musk.
And I mean, it's just there's so much
here. I'm seeing a much bigger game being
played. Now let's start with the censorship of
Lucas Cage,
which anybody that follows this work. There's plenty
of things. They're wildly,
not to say wrong, but things that are
contentious, just meaning they know there's gonna be
controversy, which by the way, A lot of
what I do is in similar way. But
I can tell you right now, there's things
that he already says and, like, I wouldn't
put it that way I don't agree with
that. But I've had more than 1 conversation
with Lucas Cage. And I feel I find
him to be a pretty intelligent person that
at the very least, I think believes he's
doing the right thing.
But I also think at times he tries
to intentionally push the limit
in order to make a point. Now I
could be completely wrong. Maybe you you decide
whatever you want about him. But what's interesting
about this is he was just censored for
doing something that you see constantly on this
platform,
which is simply
Let me put it this way actually. He
was censored for the accusation of doing something
that we see constantly on this platform.
Many people, Ti 1 of them 19 4
here, centered man, calling this out and making
this point well.
My point in saying it like that is
because will show you what he at least
Elon publicly states was the reason for his
removal,
and you can prove that that has nothing
to do with calling for violence against people.
And you could make the argument as we...
As the governments and all the supposed left
side of this want to do, which is
that those words mean violence and it's radical
rationalization and saying this leads to that, and
therefore, you're committing violence. That's not supposed to
be an Elon musk right wing allowance You're
supposed to be like, free speech. Right? But
that's what's happening.
But it's okay because it's about Israel, we're
supposed to protect Israel, and it's not... Then
you get this contradiction of percent the way
you perceive yourself to be on a political
side. As they're opposed to just going I
think that's right. I think that's wrong. I'll
stand with whatever side it's on, whatever I
think is right. The 2 party illusion
drives people to contradict their own beliefs.
19 84 writes should Lucas Gauge be reinstated.
If you haven't seen it we'll get into
why as we go through this.
Now it's funny first of all, as he
makes this point to call it Elon musk
This is what does it say about Elon
Musk if he isn't.
I mean, let's be clear. What does it
say about him that he was, whether or
not he's brought back? Understand. And this is
showing you that this is not what they
claim it was.
Now it says fate loves iron It's a
cool. For me elon Musk. Fate loves irony,
but hates hypocrisy.
I... I forget when he said this, but
it was... I think it was before he
was or or after before right on the
time is taken over Twitter. I think, but
don't quote me on that. This says I
cannot claim to be a defender of free
speech
But then,
permanently banned someone who hasn't violated the the
loss. Excuse me. That's right. So this was
right after I think we took on Twitter.
Then he goes on to say.
No matter how much I disagree with that
with what they say. Okay. So the bar
was set, which we've all pointed out. Numerous
examples where they've already broken this set. Bar
or didn't... Whatever the term would be didn't
violate didn't go over the bar. I don't
know. The point is,
He's already removed multiple people that did not
break the law. What about right in the
beginning with
don't forget his name?
The guy who said, love everybody.
Shoot. You know, he's famous. I forget his
name off top of my head. The singer
or whatever The point was that he said,
Puff who was... Forget. I just a matter
at the point that he said love everybody.
But because he framed it with a Nazi
symbol, they removed. Was that breaking the law.
No. Then, obviously, you didn't mean anything you
just said right there and still don't. Because
now you're moved somebody,
And here's what he says. Here's she falls
up on this and says Gauge made repeated
and clear calls for violence.
Now, he only shows you 1 as the
reason which does not call for violence. I'll
show you a second. But the other ones
are arguably, which I think was kind of
even in Elon conversation, the tearing of a
Israeli flag.
And saying that... And, you know, saying it
in very serious terms. I think he was
even pointing and Ivan even saying, we need
to get... Forgot what he said. But the
implication was
these people need to be removed from our
lives from our society that... You could argue
that means violence, but that's not explicit calls
to violence. Then he, I I think he
burned a tal.
Which again, you see that happen with the
Quran, you see that happen with the Bible.
So it's very interesting that this is a
very 1 side game is being played. Now
if you argue that everybody burning a religious
book should be censored than say that. I
disagree. I think it's free speech,
but that's not what's happening.
It's very 1 cited.
And he says,
which is illegal? Calls to violence, hence, 6
months suspension.
Right.
What about people like
James Woods. Hashtag killed them all.
Oh, but that's okay though. We we just
limit the speech. We keep the post public
though, that literally says kill them all.
That's... See what I'm saying like, that's ridiculous
because James Woods, gigantic, and he's a republican.
Of course. So that's that... We're... We gotta
keep appearances don't we? The point again is
hypocrisy. I
fate does hate hypocrisy. So we'll see how
this plays out. But it says rule rule
applies to everyone clearly not, apart from the
Un exemption, which by the way, I think
is crazy for recognized leaders of countries. If
politicians can say something to the Un general
assembly, then they can say it here.
Well, the point should not be that you
allow something because of an allowance. Your point
that you have a rule on your abide
by it. I get the point of people
in in politics, but there's plenty of other
venues where these things can be posted. The
point is apply it equally. You allow an
exception to allow... You know, you will abuse
it. But he says,
Lucas never and would never call for violence.
Now, I've heard him talk. I'm not gonna
say I know everything he's ever said, but
I agree. I think the way he spoke
at least on our interview I'll show you
was very clear. Yes. He's he's very serious
about his opinions, and I think today is
a time for serious opinions.
But
I've never heard him say, we should go
kill those people. In fact, I've heard him
adamant argue that things like Us military practices
are the wrong thing. So just being clear,
I think this is a mis
whatever you think of whether he's right and
what he's saying. He says quite the opposite.
He advocates for unity and solidarity across all
racial lines against the ideology that is
Jewish supremacy.
So we're getting into the idea of what...
And again, whether you agree with that whether
it exists or not, which obviously does according
to the human rights groups in the world
Bet sell being an Israeli group calls it
Jewish supremacy and what's going on in Israel.
The point.
If you're talking about supremacy.
Is not supposed to be something we all
disagree with no matter where it comes from.
And he says, you know, the ones that
have been terror him with impunity, which is
true.
And then Said this. That the post that
triggered this was this 1. Well, let's read
it. It says the rabbi at the rabbi
admit Jewish
is a poison to us.
Okay. So whatever you think about that, he
didn't call for violence or ask for anybody
to do anything these people. He says, again,
we have every right to remove these poisonous
people,
and their satanic Ism
from our society. Now even let's to even
say he said let's remove Jews from our
society.
I would think that was disgusting I them
say that was wrong. That's still not calling
for violence. He can say he might mean
that but you see how this game gets
played, I'm pretty sure hashtag killed them all
is pretty explicit.
Either way, that's not even what he said.
He very clearly said. The right to remove
these boys in these people, which I getting...
If we were talking about nazis, everybody be
like, yeah. Absolutely.
That does that mean we're all gonna kill
them Well no. You say remove them, they're
not a part of our So it's a
game that's played in this on Twitter right
in front of us where it's 1 side
that matters 1 side that doesn't. But he
does go on to say there Ism.
That seems to be the focal point here.
And here's a great response by 84. He
says Ism equals ideology,
I e. Communism
Transgender ism, Marxism, and he's doing it for
reason. All the things that Elon Musk and
the rest of the people supporting is rightly,
you know, his 2 party illusion, manipulated platform,
are actively calling out.
So it it I guess it depends on
which ism you're talking about then, clearly not
objective. Is it He says not an ethnic
group. He advocates for non violence in unity,
which he does. You un Us marine that
served honor for his right to free speech.
These people are terror his family in 2
kids, which I'm not gonna get into, but
it's very clear watches content. He's getting, because
he's very outspoken.
I mean, even myself, I'm experiencing the same
thing. I don't talk about it all the
time. Dms and messages, people are full
of some of the most disgusting over the
top hatred just because you call out things
that other Jewish people in the world are
rising actively,
growing in calling out.
And Simply calling for, again, peace and unity,
and acceptance or in acknowledging what the real
extremism is today.
Even if you're wrong, you Dan will have
the right to do so, but you get
hatred for that. While calling for peace and
unity.
Now, Ti says so when is James Woods
being suspended.
This is from November, it's still live. Now
just because it says limited limited visibility limited,
you still see what he says. No cease
ceasefire no compromise, no forgiveness killed them all.
Now, of course, you could argue you. He
only means him hamas, but he didn't say
that. Did he? So here we are assuming
into Lucas Gauge post because we know what
he means.
Or, and over here, giving him a pass
because, well, he probably... So either way, you're
you're you're leaning into what you think you'd...
What they we want them to mean. In
the interest of what benefits them and hurts
the other.
This is hypocrisy, Ladies and gentlemen, there's no
way around it.
Here's no 1. This is not a call
for violence. Of course, Laura Loom is constantly
calling for the exact same thing. She said,
there's no such thing as Palestine.
Right. So we're allowed to say River the
this, you know, nowhere over to the sea
because that means getting rid of all All
Jews and Israel, which it clearly doesn't based
on everyone's conversations. But no Palestine okay. Just
it's always been a fig of the imagination
of these Islamic terrorists and jew haters. Israel
real belongs to the Jews.
For the sake of humanity and what is
righteous and good in the war on evil
israel must level gaza, flatten into a parking
lot and then glass it.
That's okay though. Right? Because she clearly means
in the in the of the peace. Right?
I mean, it's just it's overwhelmingly obvious and
the people like her like the matt wallace
isn't and the rest of them out there.
They're just, like, oozing their constant garbage of
misinformation and partisan narratives
everywhere while omit anything that's dangerous as to
what they're trying to accomplish and they're screaming
growing on this platform while they don't... While
they censor anybody disagrees with them.
The reason of all of this is to
show you not just the israel direction, but
the idea that we're in a position where
I just talked about this morning, which will
include link on a wake up.
The conversation of how...
I mean, we are being social engineered in
some of the most alarming ways Ever seen.
Different versions of different things will be feel
like we're the mass massive social engineering experiment
with different grouping that they're testing... I mean,
like, you guys can decide for yourselves what
you think all the sets up to on
Twitter side of it. Either way, it is
a a knowing in my opinion part of
driving you into what I think is the
next step here.
Any ti ads in addition to this, it's
absolutely in saying to see Elon Musk saying
this while letting thousands of zion who call
for the death of palestinian children, Roam free
on this platform. Just search look it up.
You'll find an endless string of the worst
things being said, and that's... It's explicit. There's
not somebody between lines here. It says some
of whom he personally follows.
And Ian Chong says everyone thinks it's okay
to call for violence as long as the
gets it's against Jews apparently.
Elon says there should be no special categories.
A clear call to violence against anyone is
not okay. Clearly defending. No, no. It's not
look anybody who you even wink Wink thinks
to saying that about the Jewish people. But
don't,
anybody else anywhere. Now kidding, this is right
now.
We've seen similar versions of this. Now, of
course, you hear it mostly from the right
about the old Twitter about how you were
anything against
the Bible was okay. You're you're burning the
bible but anything out, the kind of thing
would be sensor. You're not allowed to do
1 or the other, or it's a, you
know, anything against attacks on white people are
okay, but everybody... We've you we've all heard
these conversations and there's some level of truth
to all of them,
Here we are.
Doing the same thing.
1 objective and not b by the 2
party illusion can see the same thing. In
a different category from a different side, but
the same thing. The same childish and obviously
will ignorant gary they're doing the same damn
thing.
It doesn't stop.
He also adds
Look, I'm not the fe engaged here. But
if you want to enforce a rule, that
rule has to be consistent. This James Woods
post to still live on unequivocally calling for
mass murder.
Musk is a fraud.
Censored man, going after him again, says, I
take I take it all these accounts will
be suspended as well. Right? Elon Musk. And
again, some of the ones you've seen. Here's
Laura Loom, more than once.
Saying I support the complete destruction of Gaza.
They have had more than enough time to
evacuate. Oh, yeah. Because they just what, you
know, the the infant babies and people in
wheelchair. I haven't had more enough time.
So just because they didn't get out of
the way It's time to murder them. Right?
Because we're calling for peace.
She says Palestinian terror must come to an
end. No. Not not her hamas. Palestinians because
you're just just not even min words there.
I support the actions taken by Israel of
cutting off water, electricity in food Gaza. Right.
So a un
un questionable war crime of collective punishment.
Because you hate those people. So it's okay.
Right? Too much support for stuff like this.
She says, I asked for to condemn Hamas
in a video,
expel all ji from Congress and turn gaza
into a parking lot.
Right Now we're calling for witch hunts and
killing everybody in the location. But these are
those sane ones that are being driven to
support.
Here's is a... I forget this guy's a
real name, but it's y Y,
saying flatten everything, fair no school, no children's
hospital, no age home, delete their entire gene
pool off the face of the earth. Those
are still public right now.
Mean I could go on. It's the same
stuff.
Can asset, governments and so on. So censored
man says those 2
No. He says since they actually call for
violence and not just not just violence, but
a genocide, and we'll ex suspend all those
featured in this collage for calling for violence
against the Palestinians
since every single example of this collage is
factual 10 times worse than what Lucas tweeted.
Rules must be applied consistently. Right?
Because if rules aren't applied consistently and how
that's a clear double standard, does it not...
No. They don't care, guys. That's the point.
If he cared at all, these things will
be immediately rem. Maybe oh. Now I see
that now they're removed, but they're not.
I don't need to convince you guys. I
think a child can see anybody not blinded
by their own partisan interest can see that
this is a double standard. And it's leading
in 1 very clear direction, which is clearly
supporting the guy... The group committing genocide in
the world that everybody can see.
Does not seem weird to anybody else?
Now this all overlaps the conversation of verification
because we're talking about a platform that is
normalizing
the idea of Id verification through digital platforms
to a side that just got done fighting,
digital Ids and social credit and great directions.
With a guy who's literally checking every box
for those exact same things. You don't see
that as being a little bit interesting and
odd. I hope you do because it is
interesting and odd and sort of ridiculous.
Now I'm gonna include my interview with Lucas,
so you guys can make come to your
conclusions about it. This was back in April
sixth, 04/05/2023,
how the true party illusion maintains division and
cultivate hate.
Take take a listen. You'll be quite surprised,
by, we... You know, you typically, like, think
about somebody who's never
watched or listen to or seen Corbyn speak
or or Roger Waters.
And all you ever heard was the cartoon
ish presentations about what they are, you'd think
they were living in embodiment of Hitler.
And if you actually go back and look
at everything that ever said, you would laugh
at how stupid that is. But it works
on some people,
Now I'm gonna play this again before we
get into the main point to start of
with it go... Starting off the main point
on I 20 20. I'm not gonna put
the whole clip. This is an 11 minute
clip. That I recommend you all take the
time to really listen to. Now I'm gonna
make this point... I mean, I'll probably make
this more than once
briefly
as it pops into my head throughout this
conversation today, But really the only time Gonna
really state this out clearly, which is that
I I hope throughout this conversation. The overarching
point is that at least you understand that
I do not think your vote translates to
the outcome.
Without question.
I think it's the most obvious thing in
this entire dynamic that every side can see,
but only as it applies to the other
part of the paradigm.
The scare dynamic where You know. Not... We're
are the ones funny. But there are the
ones cheating, and they other decide to saying
the same thing. The reality is there's evidence
across the board in every election of ever
seen life where these sides are cheating as
much as they can and often getting pointed
to. In this case, this was the year
2000,
Clint Curtis was a program who testified in
front of State Congress that yes, I was
paid to create for Tom Fee,
a program that would allow them to cheat.
And here's the crazy part as the election,
the machine that were used despite this testimony
were the very machines that were used in
the next election.
And and and and there's even times over
the years where you've seen a democrat and
alternatively the next year, the of Republicans going
with the machines or she other machines are
are notoriously manipulative manipulated
And then, of course, they're the 1 that
in the position. Like, no. Machines are safe,
and it's just unbelievable.
And it os back and forth. The reality
we're still in the same position. So Before
even get in to the idea of voting
manipulation. Let's realize that even if you can
con... Can make sure that your vote is
from... That all votes are from people that
are ac citizens, what does that even matter
if your vote doesn't translate to the outcome.
If they can manipulate at the top of
the whole conversation.
Just think about that as I play this
clip.
I'm a computer programmer.
Mister Curtis are there programs that can be
used to secretly fix elections. Yes. How do
you know that be the case?
Because in October of 2000, I wrote a
prototype for present Congressman Tom Bin,
at the company I worked for in Avi
veto, Florida that did just that.
And when say did did just that. It
would ring an election? It would flip about
51 49.
The whoever you wanted to go to and
whichever race you wanted to win.
And would that program that you designed be
something that elections officials that might be county
boards of elections could detect. They never see
it.
Mister
would you answer that question once again? They
would never see it.
So how such a such a program, a
secret program that, fix the election, how could
it be detected?
You would have to view it either the
source code or you'd have to have a
receipt and then count the hard paper against
the actual bot. Other than that you won't
see it.
Very important.
Now, this is an 11 minute comp... 11
minute testimony.
That I I recommend you take the time
to listen to because it gets into detail.
The idea of how this would work and
how the fact. And the main point right
in the beginning are clear. Nobody would see
this. Unless you know what you're looking for.
Right? Unless you... And then last part there...
To view it either the source code or
you have to have a receipt and then
count the hard paper against the actual bot
toe. Okay. Other than that, you won't see
it. So the point is source code... You
know, unless you know what you're looking for
it makes clear to conversation even with the
source code, you wouldn't know.
But that's why he mentions that paper Ballots.
Our friend of the Joe, Pasta has made
clear for a very long time. Now, I
will point out that Musk and others with
this conversation, screaming about why we need the
save act
or our our to their credit, in some
cases, making the argument that what we need
are paper paper ballots, and and a complete,
you know,
receipt process where we can check it with
sent with the receipt. And so, you know,
literally check the paper ballots
alongside the test the record of who was
there who voted and you get a receipt.
I agree with that. But just because the
people pushing this right now are making that
case,
Let's not pretend like that's where this will
end up. I don't believe that. I don't
believe for 1 second, whether or not this
past that your government behind these people, the
partisan pun and scream,
will then go that direction. Does anybody think
they're gonna go to paper ballots ever in
our future? None of them want that? Some
people say it in politics, but that's not
where it's going. We are sprint in the
direction of digital and everything. I Ai automation,
everything.
It just wouldn't make any sense. I hope.
I hope so. So I want you to
think about that. But the point being here
clearly
that this is
the main point It. That even if you
think that this might change something if we
believe or understand that the manipulation is that
clear, we just need to make sure we...
Like, just see the bigger picture here. But
I think this is... My... I guess, the
point Making is that if this is the
case, then Clearly, this is about something other
than making sure voting is happening properly.
Again, the setup up for the point that
I think it's about digital identification. Now on
reaching out to Twitter while I was
getting a play act that was the person
who actually,
reached out and made this point. So I
just wanna grab that real quick and give
a shout out because I appreciate that. And
I'm always... Hate... I'm glad I'm mad that
I forgot. I'm glad I saw him his
text pop of my phone.
Here
is the person who reached out to me.
Just, you know, give a shout out. Say,
it's a
Deputy Bobbi Boop. Which what is that
Mary Pop? I think. I don't know. Remember
give me a chat. What which which which
movies is that? But it says he lab
you may have covered this already, but would
be interested in your breakdown of the clear
problem reaction solution going to push people into
accepting the Id. Now in the actual build,
there's no specifics about digital Id, but that's
where we get into the real Id overlap.
So thank you for showing this shouting this
out. This is why I'm talking about this
today. So going into this.
Let's start with the Id 20 20. Because
at the... Hopefully, you're following along with the
overlap point. So say act,
using real Id as 1 as the main
focal point. My conversation here to highlight that
the... This is overlap with Id 20 20.
I'll explain to you what that is and
why concerning, and that is about digital identification,
which was overlap during Covid. And showing you
all of that, I think this is a
very clear
Oh, Cinderella. That's right. A very clear direction
for
digital Ids, social credit.
You know, the whole digital infrastructure that they're
all telling you we're leaning into, which creates
a world,
especially with the people we all see leading
it, even if you're only looking at the
other side of the paradigm that will use
I mean, it'll create a techno democratic prison.
That's what we all see coming. And even
people in our government and human rights groups
around the world are making the same points.
And I'll get into that with Their work
on digital Ids. Now this starts with an
article that we put out, actually a show
I did from 06/22/2020,
called
Id 20 20 defect speaks on, quote, techno
no
with immunity passports.
Here's the article we're referencing. It's from 20
20 in May. Decentralized Id at all costs.
The adviser quits over what she called a
blockchain fix station.
Now just because remember,
the Cbd doesn't have to be blockchain,
but we... That's largely what we're seeing,
The point here is not necessarily it's simply
about the drive to get you into the
first step.
Remember, even before Covid 19 as well, I
think some point show, there was a push
to get you into this conversation. About, I
think 1 was about,
kind of number of top my head.
Something it was unrelated. I think, oh, it
was the opioid crisis. It just it's just
crazy how the neck, whatever the current crisis
is, somehow
is rationalize to justify whatever thing they want
to accomplish.
So 1 point it was because, you know,
opioid crisis and the hospitals just we need
digital ideas. I swear. It's it's Now that
it was Covid 19. Now it's something else.
Now it's
illegal immigration. Right? I mean, there's always some
justification for the thing that they want, and
sometimes it may even make sense to you.
This says Id 20 20 aimed to bring
digital identities to billions of people. And it
says in a resignation,
the adviser
She left she an email. My name is
Elizabeth Ramirez,
cited Id 20 twenties opacity,
tech
that was her quote, and corporate influence along
with the risks of applying blockchain to many
passports. Now removing for the moment anyway because
it's not off the table by any means,
the immunity passport side of this. And you
could simply argue that if digital Id was
the only just only reason for this big
push, at least the first step that let's
just say some new Si up pathogen comes
around. Well, they just become... That becomes your
passport. You digital Id on your phone, and
now outside leave has your immunity sports information.
So the point is it's all just on
a means to the same end. When I
says, at this stage, I can no longer
she's speaking on the record. I can no
longer describe what Id 20 twenty's mission is
with any confidence.
So a person who has been involved in
this.
Suddenly going, I don't even know what they're
doing anymore. So it shows you that this
is not about what they at least laid
out as their path. She says, and who
she wrote who was... Excuse me. It's... Who
she was 1 of the 6 members of
id 20 twenty's technical advisory committee. She says,
quote, all I can perceive
is a desire to promote
decentralized identity solutions at all costs.
That sure sounds pretty clear.
She says, quote, blockchain enabled immunity certificates or
in fill in any other thing they're pushing
forward to drive that desire.
If implemented by public authorities would have serious
consequences for our fundamental human rights and civil
liberties.
She worries about how the influence of corporations
like Microsoft,
may influence the development of these systems.
Many of these same companies and any any
many others you could name overlap with... And
it's not just about elon Musk it's just
showing you a highlighted between the leading entities
of this conversation in regard to the social
media platforms and and there's all these overlaps.
You could see inner inter pointing el with
build gates and same things. Whether it's mrna,
micro factories. These all these conversations with Tesla,
and Elon musk, There's so many overlaps this
whole thing. That's not necessarily the larger point,
but just showing you that they're I think
what the reason I'm including eat Twitter in
general is I think it's playing a really
central role and a lot of the things
we're seeing.
My opinion.
But it says Kim Cram, architect of identity
at Microsoft sits on Id 20 twenty's board,
and Kim Gon or
Gh,
newly appointed at board chair also works in
Microsoft, pretty interesting. Quote, it says who is
doing the building here is a critical vulnerability.
She says, as critical as any technical challenge,
this is 100
percent, a hammer looking for a nail.
And nobody wanted to listen to her.
She says the article reads the Id 20
20 alliance, which seems to have sort of
been kind of disappeared in the background, even
some of their website plaque, like, deleted with
new Id 20 20 dot org setups. It
says is a public private partnership. Surprise surprise.
With partners including Microsoft, accenture we've talked about
and hyper ledger. It hopes to develop a
a global model for the design,
funding and implementation of digital Id solutions and
technologies. So don't forget that. The central point
of of Id 20 20
was digital Id.
She says, I cannot be part of an
organization overly influenced by commercial interests that that
only pays lip service to human rights.
The stakes are simply too high at this
stage.
Oh, good on her for having the courage
to to
stand by what she believes.
Just highlight and that's why I didn't lose
it. So before we get into the part
of the overlap of the 2,
I just wanted to highlight some of the
work that
Eric Rose put out on Tl lab. And
New York, the Nyu school of law, warren,
digital Id, quote, paving a digital road to
hell. Those are their words, which I'm still
blown away by.
Whether it's their that was where they titled
their their work here, and this is from
the Nyu center why you send up for
human rights in global justice.
I think there's 1 part in here.
Hold on.
Yeah. So this was about the
driver's license point. I... And I I think
I skipped it for a reason, but
The point in this was simply 1 of
the points that the he highlights in law
of his work is this interesting overlap to
the digital driver's license?
Which just kinda be written pretending like, no.
No. It's just it's just putting your your
Id on your phone. Right? It's just not
on a digital identification. What's what it is?
And so it's about slowly centering this around
the digital version of this and then no
longer making it necessary to have the physical
version, and suddenly, they start emailing you the
new thing. That and it and then all
of a sudden, your Id is technically digital.
And it's a small step, but it is
a huge manipulative step I argue in driving
you into this. Now they're being plenty
be plenty of you out there that don't
even think this is a big deal. But
if you haven't been paying attention to the
overlaps and people like her literally
resigning her board position because
it's it's a techno bush and that their
digital Id being the central part in how
they're driving you into this, not for what
they say they are.
And here you got Nyu school of law
saying that this whole thing is paving a
digital to hell. That's alarming.
So here, he writes in 05/13/2022.
Exposing the digital ideas as a human right
scam. Now, that's a big part of this
still. The idea that we have to force
this on everyone in Africa because it's a
human right, and they're all screaming for No.
They desperately don't want what you're offering in
pretty much every circumstance. This is to make
it seem as if you're being
when in reality you're
exploiting these people.
And there were some parts here.
It says in May 20 21, the Ac
aco you released a blog in response to
concerns around
vaccine passports in this point for the conversation
Read digital Id. The Ac aco warned about
digital identities,
including recent efforts to mandate digital driver's license.
Which was like kind of a small quiet,
you know,
fictitious move in the same direction. Quote, a
move to digital Ids because see even Ac
called it digital Id. What it is, is
not a minor change, but 1 that could
drastically alter the role of identification in our
society. Increase in equity and turn into a
privacy nightmare.
Now see none of those seem to be
part of the conversation for what's happening over
here with the save act because we're not
connecting the dock a digital Id part of
this, which I believe is very clear, but
you can decide yourself when we get their
next. That's just finally, the organization privacy
international directly challenged the United Nations
sustainable development goals. And ask, quote, the sustainable
development goals, which is our
overlap with this. They are intertwined with the
Id 20 20 conversation. That's point not forget.
So right now that my argument is people
that are on republican side that are in
the sa act are in inadvertently
supporting the very things that thought they were
fighting during Covid 19. That's my point from
the beginning.
It says this... The as sustainable development goals,
identity and privacy does their implementation risk rights,
the report states. Quote, the if actors fail
to consider the risks.
Id systems can themselves, threaten human rights,
particularly
the right to privacy.
They can become tools for surveillance by the
state and the private sector, they can exclude
rather than include. Now think about that even.
The idea that if at some point, you
can simply use these tools to box people
out, which is what the what left arguably
is saying in some cases about the idea
of the Id part of this.
Now it says there are thus risks in
the implementations of the Scheme.
Not only that it fails to meet the
promise of SFG
sustainable development goals, but that it also builds
a system for surveillance and exclusion.
It is thus essential to critically engage with
the interpretation of the goal and the uses
to which it has been put.
It also says, now this is just before
it, but I think it's important here afterward.
The group access now published a report.
Entitled busting the dangerous myths of big Id
programs,
cautionary lessons from India, which is already going
through this.
Focused on the concerns surrounding India's implementation of
their digital Id. We're seeing this in Australia.
We're seeing it all over the world. Whether
they have laws being passed.
To justify and roll out the digital ids.
Now it says the... And I guess theirs
is called Ad hoc. The report includes
that's so called big Id programs, which this
falls into that category, guys. That is programs
implemented by governments with the help of big
tech.
Are not needed to get people a legal
identity.
Further, the report found that big Id creates
space for surveillance to flourish
and demonstrated as demonstrated by India's system. The
point simply being, you don't need
these real Id digital or even just centralized
examples to do what they claim they need
to do.
That's that's kind of always with our governments
fall into.
Now this 1 is about Mexico,
and who is behind the drive the push
for digital driver's lenses in the Us and
Mexico.
Only a couple quick points I wanna highlight
here, and this was posted on 20 23
August 18.
The fails group. As he writes fingerprints all
over digital Id programs. So I'll see the
same kind of things that we've highlighted. Sales
grouping being a massive worldwide manufacturer weapons, we
have Black rock clearly driving this and Cbd
overlap with the Twitter push for the same
thing. There's a... You know, it's it's not
a
fight for elections kind of conversation I think
in my opinion. It says the Sales group
is a French multinational corporation, which is partially
owned by the French government and the eighth
largest
military weapons contractor in the world.
Sales Group is a part of the great
reset. And he says, overall, sales group has
been a part of the international shift towards
digital identities and the promotion of the technology
as a human ride. It says, quote, they
dale wrote. The lack of identity is not
just a loss in terms of being seen
by the system in society. It is an
exclusion that prevents people from achieving their full
potential. They cannot be educated. They cannot access
healthcare care services. And their children inherit at
this legacy as they're born outside of the
system.
I mean, it's... Derek has written so many
articles about highlighting what a ridiculous claim that
is,
you can't access healthcare care services because you
don't have the digital Id, where that this
is the world they're creating.
That doesn't have to be the way this
is. Lastly,
he highlights this, and this is where it
overlaps with Twitter. This is all way back
in 20 23, but we were already highlighting
as it show we did as well. About
Twitter using authentic. The Israeli platform which now
at least were told, that's no longer happening.
Something tells me that that caught... That relationship
didn't go away. Just my personal opinion. But
it says the air of digital driver's licenses.
It says 1 of the latest efforts to
normalize the use of digital Ids is known
as mobile driver's licenses or Md l. Now
watch for those. Because there'll be a kind
of a syrup just way of stating digital
Id without you looking... Seeing the word digital.
And it says or simply digital driver's licenses.
These digital Ids are beginning to roll out
across the North America,
in 3 common forms, including proprietary apps owned
by local state and national governments, various state
approved apps like smart d,
some of which are already going on places
like Florida, and the Apple wallet, which 4
Us states are currently using to host their
digital driver's licenses.
According to a guide, a digital driver's license,
according to a guide to digital driver's licenses,
Users will open the chosen app, scan the
front back of their driver's license,
the physical 1 and then verify their identity
with a selfie.
Or similar biometric data.
Exactly what twitter seems to be asking for.
Something very similar to what appears to already
be starting on Twitter Once verified the user
can begin using their digital Id app as
they would a physical Id card.
And then just interestingly showing you the overlap
of fails and must, there is a collaboration
here in regard to their... I think it's
in Mongolia, building satellites, simply a joint venture
between
fails and
and Elon Musk, in regard to their... In
in regard to Spacex to commercial the satellite
unit service, Star.
This that that may be no no meaning
to anybody. But the point is to see
these intertwined overlaps of the very people pushing
the same things that he has a financial
interest in.
Now, Cedric man, I just wanna include these
for you to look at, highlighting
and the idea that they were trying to
steal your dad. We all saw this and
they weirdly pull it back.
So I suggest that he wasn't doing his
due diligence on what they really were or
didn't care, and I just think it was
the public outcry. That's all it was. So
that's why I questioned whether it was even
actually rude. You can decide yourself. You haven't
seen this the point is Authentic isn't an
is israeli
intelligence platform that even they themselves argue was
involved with, like, 90 percent of their intelligence
gathering in the world, and we're gonna allow
them there... Well just takes time off that
to verify your Id for Twitter. Right? I
think we all know what's really going on
here.
And then this 1 is interesting to brings
us into the conversation. This is back in
June third.
Bro.
Highlight Well we'll first keep. This is Elon
Musk.
Pro posted this about authentic and said, hey,
Elon. Can we have an American alternative for
Id verification? So first point,
whether you think this is organized or not?
Very problem reaction solution isn't it?
Here we'll dump in front of you, the
most obvious intelligence cut out from Israel that
wants to scoop up your biometrics, whether or
not we need it.
So we all go rightly. Hold on. That's
not okay, And then we swing in with,
okay. Well, here's an American version. Suddenly we're
going, oh, okay. Well, that's better? Is it
not?
Even though all we really did was call
for our own ver. I mean, see how
that works.
But he says, are there legit... There are
real legit concerns, Nuance, Sorry My chair keeps
squeaking. I gotta get this thing
changed. But it says there are legit concerns
about how these israeli companies are tied in
with Israeli intelligence.
Which we... They very clearly were.
He responded... Then he says, might I suggest
Id dot me which I never... It's an...
I've never looked into, but I... I've really
bet you. There's probably all sorts of concerning
over. Overlaps usually are. But it says, is
an American company founded by army rangers seems
to be better and so on, not what
they end up using. Right? I believe they're
using stripe now. He says we'll investigate.
Then he says on the third of June,
ladies and gents, you're welcome,
I guess,
Ian Carroll says, hell, yeah. Then this person
coming in with the... What I think is
the most important point. This conversation says, this
is just the first step into the beast
system. Now whatever your thoughts about the market
of the beast and so on,
realize that I... This what... They're saying here
is very very valid. Getting the sheep used
to real Id. So here he is saying
this or whoever this person is, man woman
saying this on June third,
calling the reality of using this to drive
you into the real Id, which now is
literally stated as I'll show you on the
documentation here,
as the real Id act of 2005, which
is the same thing. I'll show you all
this.
Gates had Id 20 20, which I'll I'll
show you proved you that they're inter lock
interconnected. They're they're not the same thing, but
they're part of the same agenda, and they
are
Put this way. Real Id is 1 part
of the 20 20 direction without question.
He says, same s It. I agree. Does
this is all smoke mirrors. So this person
very clearly believes
that this is about
driving you into this to make you think
you major own choices. Right? And here they
are going, yeah. Look, we did it. We
was gonna use the 1 and it's just
about manufacturing consent, That's what I believe. So
pandemic special here for the podcast. Nailed it
I think.
Now,
let's talk about Id 20 20.
In the overlap
to real Id, which is listed
in the
safeguard guardian American Voter Act as 1 of
the lead examples of what needs to be
used. In a moment, I'll go through why
the rest of them seem to guarantee that
that's going to be the focal point then
what happens when they push you into a
position where there are no more physical things.
Well, suddenly, then it doesn't even matter anymore.
We'll come back to this.
So here is a archive from last year,
Id 20 20,
post, which is gone. Now, by the way,
and says the need for good digital Ideas
is universal. Now, Id 20 20 post on
dot org are still there. So I find
it interesting. That at least in my experience
from today and and researching that all the
things that seem to have an overlapping point
about real Id.
Are now go on. Now I'm not saying
that means anything. You guys can decide for
yourself what that might mean.
Go ahead. There's a lot in here. But
you can read it into all the same
stuff. We need to get digital Ids. It's
a human right. Same thing, Derek was calling
out.
But all the way at the bottom here,
it says, in September 2000 fifth. 18, all
United Nations member states adopted the 20 20...
The 20. I keep you at 20 20
30. 20 30,
sustainable development goals,
including
their commitment to provide legal identity for all
including birth registration. This isn't getting a real
idea yet. The point here is that this
is the
the the Id 20 20 page about the
digital identification discussion
that literally states clearly that 1 of their
goals
that they agreed to back in 2015,
providing legal identity for all including birth registration,
which just so happens to be the main
focal point,
of this conversation.
That you... Your Id doesn't it doesn't suffice
anymore. You need to have some re you
need to have proof of where you were
born
citizenship. And again, I'm... I argue that it
does make sense, whether you verify it or
not that it should be American citizens voting
that is the law. Right?
But so is it because they just wanna...
Make sure your voting is done by American
citizens or is it because they all agreed
in 2015
to make sure we eventually got everyone proven
to have burst registration
by 20 30.
Something for you to consider. I'd argue a
lot of the republicans out there would never.
That can't be As this is about illegal
immigrants, or it's just the excuse they used
to get you worked up so you justify
birth registration by 23.
Something to consider.
Now here,
Id 20 20 and real Id. Just a
quick general search. Here's what it says. 20
20 and real Id are 2 related concepts
that have gains significant attention in recent years.
Real id of Federal law passed 2005, which
again, I'll show you...
It's literally been postponed again, And again, and
again, because the whole idea back then under
the guise of terrorism.
Again, I say, guys because we have... Can
look back and see who was really causing
that stuff. And The point is
that all the way back then under the
under the guise of fighting terrorism, you needed
to get this new id. Which means they
had to roll this out. They became sort
of a national concept. That's where the Id
20 20 really overlap. It was about everybody
in the country having the same identification. You
didn't have different state identification. It was just
1
identification. And overlap with medical aspects and overlap
with all sorts of... Every year seeming like,
new things were attached to what they need
to do for certain agendas,
point.
I is that it got kicked down the
road because nobody was doing it. Nobody was
ready. I think also because they were waiting
for a right moment for the overlap of
the technological
advancements.
But it says I 20 20 is a
specific type of real Id. K. So just
here that Id 20 20, and I I
actually would frame it the other way around,
but either way, the point is, Id 20
20 is a specific type of real Id
compliant driver's license or identification card.
Okay. So right there, as we're highlighting in
their own build that they say real Id
and in this, you can clearly see
drive
Or was it? Hey, maybe it's not in
the bill itself. There was... They used the
term in their conversations.
Real Id compliant. Maybe I got the word
wrong. The point is the same that they're
talking about it has to be in line
with the real Id
I'm pretty sure it's... Oh it's in 1
of these. I'll come back to it. They
they has to be aligned with that compliance
of overlaps of what can... Constitutes a real
Id compliant identification. So what they're highlighting here
for you is it Id 20 20, which
is about digital Ids I just made clear
is 1 of the real Id compliant driver's
license. So that's interesting. Right there, there's an
overlap. So it doesn't even need to be
questioned,
is that the main focal point, I think
so you guys can decide as we go
forward.
Now here's where it makes it much more
clear. That was a general search. Here are
some specifics. Here's from Washington from 2019.
Washington residents will need real... Oh, that that
there's 1 of them. Is my... There's a
lot... This is how they frame it. A
real Id compliant,
identification to start flying in October 20 20.
Now that didn't happen. Mind you, just like
we did. They did in 20
15 or whatever the years they passed. 20
20 was 1 they kicked it down this
they said, oh, because of the pandemic. Then
it became 20 23. Then they oh, now
it's 20 25. Right now it's set for
20 25 as we'll come back to you
and show you. I think it's right here.
The Yeah. 05/07/2025.
I mean, it's a ridiculous deadline is how
they've kicked it down the road since 2005.
Something's very odd, isn't it? But what they're
saying is at this point before 20 20
that you needed a real Id compliant Id.
Here's what it says down here. Reminder,
You have 1 year, which didn't happen. That's
israel's everyone's joking about that when this conversation
as you look it up. But it says,
quote, you may already have the travel Id
you need if you have 1 of many
real Id compliant documents.
Or Washington's enhanced driver's license or Id card,
We've been using our
Id 20 20 campaign
to help educate residents on the various op
and we strongly encourage them not to wait
until 20 20.
Right there.
Id 20 20 is the digital Id idea
with and clearly went hard during the pandemic
illusion,
telling you digital Id, but that's what it
was then. This was about digital identification. At
least in the main drive. Here is another
1. This one's from on 11/20/2020.
Author of Us digital Id bill
discusses his central role of biometrics
in 20 20 webinar.
Oh, here's that point too. Congressman says politics
of patent Id change by opioid crisis.
That's the main focal point. This overlap with
Covid 19 stuff to a degree. If my
point is the narrative is just narrative It's
about driving in the justification for exactly the
same thing. Is what it says. When they
are finally established,
Us digital Ids, as is if as if
it's a fore forgotten conclusion, because to them,
it is,
will likely be based on smartphones
and biometrics.
Us congress Bill Foster, the author of the
improving digital Identity Act, which is currently before
Congress with bipartisan support said in an Id
20 20 webinar.
And it says fostered, Of course, you can
see in here,
where was it back a case. This says,
foster discussed the need for secured digital identity
to back a wide range of services, including
any digital immunity certificates that might be established.
Right? So it was just kinda starting at
that point. Now that was that was the
side thought. And then it became focal point
on. We needed to stop a pandemic, but
the point is the narrative shifts around it.
And if we're talking about Bill Foster
might be interesting to look on this actually
and see
who is involved.
Oh, that's course bill.
Doesn't look like foster in there. Is even...
I don't even know if that Don't know
all the names of everybody in congress, so
maybe he's not even there anymore. Let me
know the chat. Where what the current status
is a bill foster
But any case,
it goes on to say the Us also
needs to up its game and work with
other countries and regional blocks to counter China's
plan, to establish a Central bank digital currency.
Of course, that's they're the only 1. Right?
Clearly, that became a world when the Us
seems to be leading the charge at this
point. So it's funny how they love to
play that game about the bogey man when
really they're involved with the same things.
And it says to use as the default
currency and it's belt and road initiative. That's
why they're... They're focusing on it As the
as the bad thing because they wanna stop
their, you know, the changing dynamics of who's
got more influence in certain positions. And says,
quote, biometrics are going to play, huge role
in all these foster notes,
and then it goes on to say part
of that involves the d
duplication. And of state driver's licenses through
the real Id system.
Okay. So just so it's very clear. This
is in 20 20
And what they're talking about under the context
of digital Ids is that what we need
the d duplication because what they're saying is
we need to d duplicate this on a
digital platform,
through the real Id system.
So everyone out there min mentioning words about
whether this is to. That's what this thing
with... Let's just even say for sake of
conversation that they've change that.
Real Id compliance are just like, you know,
what whatever we decide or within the realm
of the things you already to use. Those
are narratives. The real the the reality of
the platform that's built around the real Id
system is digital identification. Based on everything we
can see and even going forward.
But it says the improving digital identity act
would prioritize ties the development of digital Id
in the United States by bringing key stakeholders
together unlock funding and established standards.
So the point ties
Id system is a central part of the
improving digital identity Act.
Pretty damn on the surface.
Here's a random article
From, I think, 20 20 forward, how digital
Ids will open up municipal of pull governments.
This is from Porta cyber tech.
And it says as of August 20 20,
governments have launched about a hundred and 65
digital or partially digital Id policies or schemes
around the globe, Clearly building.
Down here it says, how is digital Id
helping governments worldwide?
What example of digital id... Digital Id wallets?
Is Florida.
Funny how republicans, you know, it's weird how
the the...
Anybody in the paradigm either left or right
seem to box out the things that
are uncomfortable from their own side of it,
you especially things like digital Ids or supporting
lockdown downs. It says 1 example of digital
Id wallets is Florida's mobile driver's license.
Just like,
Derek was calling out.
Florida smart Id. It's called.
The app will allow Motorists is to... Scan
the Qr barcode code from their smart device
and verify themselves. And we talked about this
briefly again, as I mentioned earlier on a
wake up today.
About the whole way... The 2... 1 of
the main ways the 2 party illusion works
is to carry out the agenda, but each
side has their role to play.
Right? So you have over here, you know,
roll... You know, pushing back on the great
reset, but then rolling out the Digital Id
faster with anybody. Right? And and the other
side's pushing back. On that... You, it it
it goes back and forth. And so you
end up going. They're the 1. They're the
bad 1. This is the why. This will
make sense on this side, and each part
is each side of the illusion is
doing their part of the agenda. To and
together, it goes this... In if without you
seeing it as a whole, you you miss
the larger picture. That's why we have to
start acknowledging it as your government. Whatever party
they claim your government is responsible. That's the
reality. You need to have as Americans thinking
about an electing government and not 1 side
of it.
Again, I'm talking about the people that are
lost. I, again, I I will... It's hard
for me to not have these conversations if,
every time the vote doesn't translate. I get
that. Why I'm trying to kind of operate
within this conversation. But I'm gonna get more
harsh on this. We go forward to the
level more so this year than ever that
it's very transparent obvious that that's not how
this plays out. Back to the point. This
digital identity legislation will ensure the privacy of
many activities, including limiting access to citizens biometric
information, the digital transformation agency, D has been
working with My gov Id developed by the
Australian taxation office to introduce a digital identity
system in Australia.
My Gov Id became becomes a unique digital
identity for every citizen that they can use
to access specific online services like My gov.
The government's online portal.
The My gov account then allows them to
use all government services online and 1 plays
all for your convenience.
The government to Pennsylvania, back in the United
States also came up with the with a
real Id compliant system.
So we're talking about digital ids here. That's
the whole point of this conversation. It says
going to be enforced in the state from
May third to 20 23, which again, got
kicked down the road like all the rest
of them. The citizens will need a digital
driver's license.
It says it right there. And this is
an article covering. My point is this is
very, very easy to see. Now we're a
different point in the conversation.
Where they don't want you thinking about the
overlap of that, but the point is very
clear, the real Id compliant system.
Right? Just like we're highlighting,
is about digital driver's licenses.
Then it goes on to say, you need
a digital driver's license or Id card passport
a military Id to board a domestic and
commercial flight.
In 2019,
the Id 20 20 alliance and government of
Bangladesh
launched a program to establish a digital identity
with vaccines.
I don't think we need any anymore... And
the evidence I'm undeniable. These are an overlapping
thing that are, again, the Id 20 20
alliance. Is a larger entity where the real
Id compliant aspect is 1 part of that
larger conversation. As I see it.
Here is 1 that's really specific. This is
from Washington 20 20.
And it simply says the real Id act.
So very clear about this The real Id
act,
which is from 2005,
but has been kicked down, and has been
and by the way, we'll get to in
a minute, Donald Trump, modernized it.
Interesting I Donald Trump, and you won't be
surprised to find out, it's a it's about
an overlap, and it's even called the save
part of it to give immigrants an identification.
Interesting. We'll come to that a second. But
the point is the real Id act goes
into effect in Washington. Again, this is it
didn't happen, but in 20 20, they say,
Is your community ready? It says help your
community be prepared for real Id by learning
about all of the options.
Down here. Look at that.
Id 20 20 information session.
They're the same thing. Ladies and gentlemen, it
says for information regarding Id 20 20, an
educational campaign to repair Washington residents 4, real
Id.
Now that's how I being framed now, but
realize the Id 20 20 what goes back
long before this kind of, like, current thing
to train you how to understand real Id.
It's it's been going on a while. And
that's why she in the midst of the
beginning of the Covid illusion resigned.
Because this is something that's been going on
a while, and they just reframe it towards
as she called it, techno no solution.
K. So I think it's pretty damn obvious.
That real Id is is overlap undeniably with
the digital identification Id 20 20 paradigm.
And here by the way is the... At
least the current what loads today from Id
20 20 dot org. And simply says, case
it was confusing since 2016,
I. E 20 20 has promoted ethical privacy
protecting approaches to
digital Ids. That's the current reality. So if
we can see that it's overlap with real
Id, then we're talking about digital Ids.
Sorry from labor the point here, but either
a lot of resistance right now. As usual
partisan conversations. So let's get into the act
itself Of today, the save Act.
Couple quick points about this what I meant
meant before. For I just... See, I jumped
the gun. First, I pointed about the real
Id progression real quickly.
This from 12/05/2022.
The Tsa says Dhs announces extension of the
real Id full enforcement deadline.
Get which from 2005
has happened over and over and over up
until now it's pushed off until 20 25.
And this person says Lol. Yet another delay
to real Id 24 months this time. From
05/03/2023
to 05/07/2025.
Time to update all those signs
was just laughing to me about how they
saw in the airport. I think it was
Derek, were was crossed off with, like, a
pen. Just wrote 20 25
pretty stupid. That just does not seem like
it makes sense unless there's something that they're
missing or they just haven't got enough compliance
from us just yet. And this act may
be just what the doctor ordered. Right?
So Andrew Good also points out to this
is the homeland security side of this pointing
out. Dhs is extending the real Id same
point.
Andrew your good says the real Id act
of twentieth of 2005, that is the act
they're highlighting here in the bill in regard
to... Sorry. Right here.
The real Idea act of 20 20 of
2005, that's in the Save act right there.
Very easy to see the connection. The real
Id act of 2005 was enacted 05/11/2005,
in response to the time to a attacks
not the the 09:11 Si op. And it
says there are kids born after this law
passed who are legally driving there are kids
born after the towers fell. That are legally
drinking before real id is implemented. He's just
going, this is ridiculous. I mean, I can't
even tell me things that should happen or
not. The point is there's something else going
on here, guys.
I've never seen something this far kicked down
the road.
I I really genuinely think there's something going
on there in regard to how they didn't
get enough
lean from people. They needed us to accept
this in some way. Like, this is getting
to the point where they need to have
us calling for our own substitution. Right?
So seeing this is something that's been kicked
down the road, ask yourself why and ask
yourself or recognize how I showed you the
narrative keeps changing around whatever the current thing
is to push in the same objective.
Now I argue if right after 09:11, they
had the technology to push in the same
things we're talking about now, that would have
happened then in Like many have argued 09:11
and Covid 19, techno democratic agenda, these were
2 parts of a similar agenda.
This is just the bios security, techno
element where they now have the nano tech
and technology advancements that justify.
Or can achieve they would argue and maybe
they failed
the next step of the same kind of
control structure. We went from the security state
to the bios security state.
So that being pointed out,
here's Elon Musk highlighting with speaker Johnson said.
And they're just making this big push to
say, look at all the people that don't
want this to happen. Now, Actually, Gonna pull
this up early.
This really does blow me away.
In and of itself, I thought this was
luna. Even even as I said to the
date for yesterday before I looked into this
deeper, but I I made the same point.
I'd... If if this is what it appears
to be and I think I... It turned
out to be more than that.
Well, I don't see why anybody would push
back against
requiring or proving that people be citizens to
vote.
But the way he posted this is what
raised my red flag,
I'm like, this is crazy, like, so this
is... I think this showed me more than
anything that this issue was important to divide.
This is what the Elon Musk posted under
the post from speaker Johnson saying the say
will safeguard elections by ensuring only Americans vote.
And maybe will,
but probably more than that too.
But he responded by saying those who oppose
this are traitors
and all caps. He actually wrote all caps
colon Mark and that Colon then says,
traitors in all capitals.
Then says, what is the penalty for traders
again?
I mean, I don't... Whether you think he's
being snarky or treat cheek or what?
I just... I I mean, I was genuinely
blown away by that.
Are we supposed to be in some kind
of mature situation where we're allowed to have
a a political conversation about how you disagree
with it? Like, what if just genuinely thinks
there's a logical reason for why that won't
benefit us, but still believes in all the
tenants of American cult. It's alarming. Somebody that
people with this much influence 56000000
views,
probably more than that now.
Not 56.1,
that you are putting this out there and
rationalizing
justify
promoting the idea that when somebody is agreed
to me politically,
you can say, not only that I think
you're a you're an anti American trader, but
that we can ins that you should be
killed for it.
I I mean, this this is only justified
under the belief that anybody pushing this is
in fact actually working for a foreign government,
Despite the fact that the fear of very
people they're doing this are actively hiding the
fact that a foreign government is the 1
clearly in the world it is, is influencing
our policy, but we can't talk about that.
Meanwhile, we'll broadly ins that this is some
kind of... I don't know what China overlap
or what are we talking about? That is
driving immigrants for the help of the Democrats,
and the whole the argument is which very
well maybe some degree true that you can't
disagree with this act like, what if there's
somebody out there that genuinely thinks this is
all about Ids and and goes, what about
my grandma? Who doesn't have any of these?
How she gonna vote? I disagree with this?
She's a that person now a trader. And
you should ins this should be murdered.
I just... I hope everybody even people in
the paradigm can see how irresponsible.
And
against your interest this tweet, no matter what's
I drawn. He's pitting you against each other.
In dangerous ways. That's my opinion.
So the point is
to this person saying, why are Democrats so
adamant against ensuring only Americans can vote? I'm
not... I I on frankly don't care about
what 1 side of the other says and
they're doing. I don't... The point is about
what the reality is of the bill.
There may be democrats in there that are
just don't see the bigger picture and think
it's just about some partisan difference or people
that wanna vote against them because they hate
that Republicans, which does exist,
or maybe they genuinely recognize the fact that
there's a
angle to drive digital Ids. Either way,
you should say, well, I disagree with you
and vote accordingly.
Not call these people traders and attack it.
Like, that's the game we're in today.
This happened from post 4000...
Post Donald Trump's election. And it was beginning
before that, but we all saw the difference.
Suddenly, you weren't just different sides of the
aisle. Suddenly, you weren't just politically disagreeing. Suddenly,
you were a threat to the country. Suddenly,
you were the reason we were all gonna
be killed suddenly, you were the reason
you were working for a foreign government. Whatever
it was.
It it was broad, na, childish and completely
irresponsible and it went and it's still happening.
Response to this or quotes. And says the
goal all along has been to import import
as many illegal voters as possible.
Maybe he's right. Again, assuming you are blind
enough to think your about actually translate to
the outcome, but that's a different conversation. The
idea that that's the only thing this is
about.
I think is part of the manipulation, and
he's been really pushing this hard. To drive
the idea that it's somehow about the fact
that they're
trying to take what's yours,
which blinds the wildly patriotic people to think
that's not about anything else?
The same people that would fight against digital
Ids should they see that being a part
of this?
Now, here's what's interesting. Here's Thomas Mass back
in February twelfth saying real Id is real
stupid.
Just another way for the federal government to
track legal citizens,
But so you mean the people that are
all fighting against
invasive, big tech surveillance and fighting against the
great reset and there... They should be against
that. Then write Massey? Yes.
Not but unless it's being framed as the
thing to stop the eagle... The evil bodily
immigrants. Then suddenly, who cares. Right? And I'm
only speaking like that to the people with
the, you know, the Republicans at the top
of the paradigm. There's a lot of conservatives
out there that are probably not along with
what I'm saying.
He goes on to say, there was nothing
wrong with state driver's licenses.
Many years ago, it was sold to conservatives
as a way to keep illegal from driving.
Flying benefits, etcetera. How did that work out.
The point is the narratives are the same.
You can look back for decades.
The new thing is framed, it... It's always
about the next agenda.
Always highlight is that they had an error
back then too, how'd that work out. And
the point is he very clearly sees the
problem.
More surveillance, more more lack of security, more
lack of privacy,
not what we're pretending this is about.
That was February twelfth.
Cryo highlights this and simply says, the Save
act, what does Ron Paul Matt Gates and
and Rand Paul, stan just think about this
bill by guarantee they all support it.
That's my opinion. But he goes, hey, elon,
the title sounds good, but did you read
the thing?
Mike Johnson has been known to speak with
the fork tongue? Fact, every republican and I
talk to. Hates that guy. That's crazy to
me, But he says not sure, but Massey
wasn't down for real Id rep package.
It's what it says in the Act. I'll
show you right now. Real id of 2005.
The very thing that everyone before this seemed
to acknowledge was a dangerous problem that was
at least infringing infringing on your privacy and
your security
Here's what he said again, and it's this
this is
a chris responding to this,
saying, so you're saying not to get 1
about the real Id. And Thomas says this,
february 12, I'm not getting 1 for as
long as I can avoid it. Your mileage
may vary, be aware, They keep saying you'll
need 1 to board a plane unless you
have a passport, but they keep pushing that
deadline back.
Now we're getting into the realm of the
idea that the past... Port will be something
of the past. If they can justify this
as a... Like, we'll get into where it
reads that you need this either way.
Now here is the bill itself. Now we've
got the senate version. We got the house
version, which appear to be the same.
I think there are minor differences as always,
but the general points that I'm wanna highlight
are the same, I'll include both for you
to look at.
So here's the main... Here's the crux of
the point.
So under this, it says, document proof of
United States Citizenship.
Now My first point on this was that,
look. If there's... If there's an easy... Process,
which there are. You don't need all these
things to verify whether or not you're a
citizen. They've got all your information. They... There's
plenty of databases out there that have your
information. It's really proving that you are who
you are. So the birth certificate, the birth
registration could verification part of this is
unnecessary,
So let's just say you wanna go vote,
and you need to verify you are who
you are.
They have... My point is when I yesterday
I was like okay, well, it seems as
if there's a way you can access online
and so on, and just simply go through
typing in your social security number, whatever It's
Yep, That's me. There you go.
Certainly could do that. Right?
But then I when I read through this,
I was my surface level point.
Because my original, the conversation was about how
we can't just make make it Ids because
there's elderly people or some others that don't
have it, which my point even then was
it seems like kind of a small point.
Right? There's some that may not, but there's
some that could do if they want Bottom
line is you should care that somebody may
not be able to vote.
And unless that is a case unless you
relax that it's all a big joke anyway.
But
this brings you into another comp part of
this conversation, where I'll read you exactly what
they highlight as the choices, which at first
kinda seems like there's a lot to go
to.
Document proof of the United States Citizenship. It
says as used in this act, the term
document documentary proof of the United States,
Yeah. Does say that. In documentary proof of
United States Citizenship means
with respect to the applicant
for voter registration, any of the following. It
says 1. A form of identification issued consistent
with the requirements of the Real Id act
of 2005
that indicates the applicant is a citizen of
the United States.
So right there, the point is that at
your driver's license
does not say whether or not you're born
somewhere.
The But the real Id does, the new
1.
I looked this up just recently.
So arguably,
You can't just use your driver's license. That
doesn't suffice anymore.
Then it says number 2, a real a
United States passport. Okay. So as I understand
it? About 48 percent of the country has
passports.
So let's just say you're going, okay real
Ids off the table, because I don't want
that. But there's all these other options is
kind of the narrative. Right? Well, a passport
box is out 50 per the country. So
right there that shouldn't be... You know, if
you... Unless you wanna fall into the real
Id process,
you half the country. Doesn't have a passport
to do it. Number 3, the applicants official
United States military identification card together with the
United States military record of service showing that
the applicants place of birth was United States,
which that is that's a very fringe and
specific aspect of what people in military. I
even asked some of the military that's mostly
those things... It's not like you just have
these lying around. That seems like an overly
complicated an element of a very specific group
of people. So that... Just... It's not even
included in my opinion. Number 4, a valid
government issued photo
identification card issued by a federal state or
tribal government showing the Applicants place of birth,
which doesn't seem to exist.
That's the point. So that seems like a
intentionally manipulative point to say, so basically, a
valid government issued photo identification with that on
it would be the real Id.
I... As far as I know,
tribal, state, federal, driver's license or Id cards
don't state where you're born. It just state
that you have that identification, and that you're
now a, you know, part of the point
is that is sort of null void in
the conversation.
Then it says number 5, a valid government
issued photo identification card issued by as a
federal state or tribal government,
only if presented together with 1 of more
of the following.
Right? So it's interesting that they say this,
as first, and I think that's why they
listed this way. 1 that shows you place
of birth, which doesn't seem to exist. Then
they say, okay, then you can have a...
Driver's license, for example, only if it's presented
together with 1 of the following,
then a birth certificate?
Which the point there is what I think
it is...
Oh, well, fir first realized that apparently, the
real Id...
Is out there and only about half the
country has those. 50 something. I just understand
it. So that means you have 50 percent
that have the real Id. That's 1 option.
You have 50 percent that have passport,
and that's, you know, none of these meet
the full picture. I would argue, let just
say you wanna to push in the idea
of driver's license like they're resisting the whole
time. That's exponentially better than what this is,
seeing how this is extra complicated now. It's
it's blocked out more people.
But then again, birth certificate, then it goes
on to say was issued by the state,
local government. And Generally, that's... I think that
was mostly the, Let's see right here.
What's the word right here. Yeah.
So it was a birth certificate issued by
the state, but then it goes on. The
rest of them just simply list
issued by the state, Local government was filed
in office responsible. So essentially burst significant.
A final adoption to create. I mean, all...
The the point is that these things are
fringe
And all this ultimately creates a situation where
you drive into the real Id situation.
Now, yes, there least right now, there'll be
people that can find the way around that,
someone of that has a birth certificate, for
example, or someone has the military situation where
you have all these documents which as far
as understand is not that you... Not that
common.
So first and foremost, if you'll have more
people that won't be able to take part.
Some of which maybe you're republican for that
matter.
But then,
my main point is that this... And but
even then right there, you've got people being
driven to the overlap digital like digital identification
under the guise of fighting this problem.
But then my point is, when this inevitably
becomes the main thing. Which they're telling you
a will in 20 25.
And all of a sudden, they go, well
the rest of these aren't valid anymore,
and they update the bill most likely the
point is then you already have this set
in stone.
They just go, well, these ones are no
longer valid because we've amended the bill. That's
how this works.
All this is in my opinion is stepping
you into a subtle direction of The very
thing they've tried to get you in with
opioid crisis. They tried to get you with
terrorism. They tried to get you in with
Covid 19 pandemic. They tried to get you
in over and over and over for a
new justification. Now they're using immigration.
I think that's ridiculous and clear.
That's not even understand to say that this
is a wrong thing we should... Like the
idea is clear
that a law should be enforced, but realize
guys, there are already laws in place. It
is illegal to vote as a non citizen.
So the real question is why are they
doing better to enforce that after the fact.
Isn't not simpler to do the realization that
I quite frankly don't think the a large
problem. I think the numbers have looked at
are ridiculously small, but you should still care,
as I said, it still matters.
But then it couldn't it be easier for
them to just May... I mean, you understand,
guys, They have massive databases with massive fat...
I mean, artificial tell everything you're using today.
You could simply look up the people's names.
They claimed their voting and you could find
out whether not their citizen. On top of
that,
people that are voting illegally and putting up
to wrong names. Mean, our own and the
the main point to make is those are
the parties doing that. You got the left
and the right, lying using
sam and voting fake name. This is constant.
They've been cheating in every possible way the
entire time. It's not some random immigrant that's
fleeing foreign a policy of Us government that's
choosing to vote for somebody, Most of which
I argue or even buy at this point,
that is actually changing this dynamic. Let alone
for the fact that it doesn't translate to
the outcome.
So here,
is the original bill, Hr 1268 from 2005.
And again, it's simply just about the
fighting terrorism. The idea that we may have
tariffs coming through is. We have to make
sure were... You know, and even then the
in this, they're talking about digital
imagery associated with this. So at this time,
it was the same dynamic.
Simply just at the first step like Derek
highlights about the driver's license, getting them digitally
or with images of it, so then it
could be cracked. Right? So this has been
1 step the entire time.
You I'll include this. You can read through
it. Here is the current update to this.
Simply saying and here's some of the points
I wanted to read about Trump's overlap. 05/07/2025
is the deadline. A deadline has been changed
47 times.
But here's what it says.
The Real Id act passed by Congress in
2005
enacted the 09:11
commission's recommendation, you know, that commission that lied
about damage everything.
The recommendation of federal governments, quote, set standards
for the issuance of sources of identification such
as specifically, driver's licenses.
Now it says, how do I know if
my license
identification card is real Id compliant.
Well, it says real Id complaint cards will
have 1 of the following markings on the
upper top corner of the card, which is
these stars or different, kind of, you know,
these 1 of these 5 different symbols it
says. If the card does not have 1
those markings, that's not real Id compliant. And
won't be accepted as proof of identity in
order to board
commercial aircraft, which again, that's not even what
we're talking about right now. Now we're talking
about voting or now it's it's it's the
same. It's 1 thing to the other.
But when you go through this process to
get this as we've talked about already as
techno
and the whistleblower was trying to tell you
it's about data
collection. It's a lack of privacy. It's a
lack of security. It's what they're do. It's
everyone's trying to tell you. Just because they're
justifying it because of immigration does not change
what the government, not 1 side of the
other, but the government is trying to do
with this project,
and this will make you more insecure in
my opinion.
Now this says on this is interesting by
the way. In... On 12/17/2018,
Donald Trump signed the real Id app
modification for freely associated states act.
The act amend the real Id act in
2005 to authorize states to issue full term
real Id compliant driver's licenses
and identification card the citizens of the federal
federated states of micron,
or Republic of Poll and Republic of the
Marshall Islands, collectively known as the freely associated
states, Fa.
Right. So occupied territories of the Us government.
The point is
Donald Trump was the first 1 to mend
this into... I mean, I argue this was
an experiment. Let's get these local areas. We're
gonna force in because we control them to
do to roll this out. And so we
just... This is a start of the digital
digital Id driver's license direction. For these groups.
Donald Trump started that.
And as as who have been admitted to
the United States as non immigrants pursuant to
the compact of free Association and who meet
the identification requirements of the Real Id act.
They're willing to give up all your personal
information.
This is the real Id act
modification under the question, what does the legislation
do?
The real Id act modification for freely associated
States act amend the real Id act to
separate citizens of the freely associated states from
the categories of non Us citizens who are
only eligible to receive a temporary real Id
compliant driver's license. Or identification card with a
a
validity period no longer than the period of
authorization stay in the United States. Or if
there is no definite end the period of
authorized day 1 year. So you realize what
you're talking about is people who are in
fact not citizens of this country who are
able to get a real Id compliant driver's
license.
That's interesting. Now yes, arguably, there's something on
there that would say you're not born in
this country. But is that I mean, I
I argue this is only more confusing. You
now have an entire part of this where
you're giving people who are in fact illegal
or rather just not American citizens
an Id that's specifically a real Id compliant
license.
I think that's pretty interesting right now with
what's going on. But it says with this
amendment citizens of the freely associated states who
represent acceptable evidence of identity. That's the main
point of all of this and lawful status
under of the real Id act.
That's... You see this whole thing
I... We're gonna get to point probably where
that can be revoked.
Not like citizenship, but your real Id, part
of this, your status can be
uncertain for many reasons because it's not just
about being born here anymore. It's about meeting
certain requirements. And it says, and its implementation
regulations should now receive a full term driver's
license.
Rather than a temporary 1.
Non citizen mind you because the Donald Trump's
modernization act,
amendment. Dennis says under What identity and lawful
status documents will Fa citizens need to present
in order to obtain this Id compliant license.
In all case, the documentation presented for proof
of identity and lawful status must be verified
through
systematic alien
verification for enlist, otherwise known as save.
Isn't that interesting, isn't this call to say
act?
So are we now being applied as Americans
or driven to go through the process that
they give foreign entities to get licenses?
I just think that's weird. Does not seem
to imply that they see you as the
same as everybody kinda does. Any case,
The bottom line is this is about digital
Ids
that's being quietly rolled through under an argument
about immigration.
Now here's the current site today. You're, you
know, your be your real Id self.
Why, because you're note you're not your real
self without your special Id,
deadline may seventh.
301 days until this happens.
I mean, it's right 20 25 is 1
of the markers for the
Un sustainable development goals.
So how does that make sense with Trump
and everybody else all taking part in driving
this just like I said, the paradigm plays
different roles. 1 side does this. The other
side does that, so they can point each
other and say they're the 1 doing the
wrong thing when both of them are playing
apart and rolling it out.
And I just went over this. I've f
pretty recently. So the point again was this
feels like driving people into this game.
Right? You're gonna get to get for the
podcast, Elon Musk saying those who oppose these
are traders. And what do we do for
traders?
Now you're gonna have people like myself and
over Argue you more so people in the
paradigm, left people that come out and scream
how wrong good is it irresponsible.
And you're gonna people on the right that
come out and say, yeah, You're a traitor.
We should put you to death if you
dare, vote for this thing because we know
you're all actually fighting for a foreign country.
Oh, you know that. Do you have seen
comments just like this?
Certainly could be, but what what point did
we get so irrational
I know it's always been that way to
a degree, but my god, this seems to
be exploding on this platform at the very
least, like subjective and ass substantive and irrational.
Like we're just lashing out because why because
of partisan talking points from people who are
shown to lie all the time, but we'll
believe it blindly right now because on Twitter.
It's terrifying to me that this is really
happening. And people this... What this can drive
someone to take violent action. But my point
is the same. He has every right to
say it. That's free speech.
Just because somebody reads that and goes, yeah,
traitor and goes and kills a congressman does
not mean that Elon Musk was responsible for
that. But it sure as hell should be
pointed at as somebody who led to that
decision. But he has right to say it,
point is, we have a right to go,
you're you get you're part of that.
The idea though is that actions are responsible
to the person taking them alone.
Not the person who said the thing that
got you to take that action. That's free
speech, guys.
That's the whole point free speech. It defends
the worst like that right there.
Now I'm gonna include a few articles there's
plenty more in the platform. That kind of
overlap this dried
and how it all really is. Let's go
back to 21.
James Cor, Covid 19 censorship techno in the
amazing country of the of digital Gu log.
That's something he framed it in 1 of
the shows. The digital Gu log is where
we're all kind of driving into.
This one's ben Swan review exposing the Covid
illusion and the impending techno democratic future.
Catherine Fits interview from 20 21, global financial
Coup D tar, and techno democratic slavery that
follows
This 1 is James again from 20 22,
the budding, bios security state and its techno
culmination.
Now, couple last points here before we wrap
up today.
This is a great point that I mentioned
in the beginning. Shout out to hands off
our children who made this point. He... They
say just like bird flu of 19 18.
Interesting, by the way, see all these things
cycle back around.
Can't do swine flu. It's too early for
that because we all know how the lie
on that 1 out or they can't, you
know Covid again, it's gonna it's gonna os
into some new version of the thing. They've
been lying us about the stuff or entire
lives.
Night that the bird flu of 19 18
brought forth passports
as a normal thing.
Wikipedia oops. Right.
Wikipedia page,
simply showing the passports have been in use
for centuries, but weren't commonly required until 19
18... 19 18.
When they became mandatory.
Now, imagine that the... And this is like
the same funny conversation of when, you know,
people suddenly required to wear Seat belt. Or
you can't drink your car anymore. And this
video is people going. That's not freedom. And
I should be able to it And now
we look back and just because we're normalized
with it and we go, that's crazy. How
they ever allow that. Well, the truth is
that Liberty and Freedom are... It's like absolute
free speech. Is the same concept.
The more you allow it, the more there
will be risk and danger, and that's your
responsibility and choice to protect yourself.
Be responsible. Self responsibility.
The more and more would let the government
make choices they claim are for our best
interest And even when you think that they
are, maybe they even are, it's still removing
your liberty.
And that's we're supposed to be airing on
the side of liberty in this country based
on how we were founded,
When you listen to my show from the
fourth.
But the idea is when this happened. I
guarantee people are like, what are you talking
about? Why don't we need to register with
you to be able to go, just walk
to these next neighborhoods right here? Just so
happen to be on the other side It's
an imaginary border.
Right? It's not to say that you don't
have your own
beliefs and and and, was what I'm looking
for.
Cultural
practices,
the point being that people naturally segregate themselves
based on time and different. And that's not
only by ethnicity color.
Did happens. That's how countries develop in the
first place.
My point is that just because you have
imaginary lines, the point... The idea is that
there's still... You still understand where your area
is and people ultimately
those things are are not. The idea of
the border is just another way of controlling
the way you see the world.
That's not that's not even to say that
they shouldn't be there today. I find it
impossible that we can pull ourselves away from
these constructs. Like the idea that governments and
I'll keeps us safe. Whether or not, I
believe that they're not the case. But my
point in saying this is that at that
time,
think about that. Like, think about it right
now, going, I, Don't I your digital Id.
To be able to go to the quarter
store. Why would they register with you to
be able to do the thing I was
just doing?
Same thing was happening then? Why don't we
need to register with some entity
and and document what I'm doing, but so
I can go to this person's house that
happens to be right over there in the
other country. You know If people like live
right on the border, for example. The point
is because of the lie,
not then that was the truth about the
what they lied about around 19 18, the
pathogen they say we're circulating as opposed to
the masks that arguably played a large role
in this that... Which by the way is
a verifiable fact.
Not because Fauci said so because he actually
didn't, but the idea is that we can
see that clear overlap like we saw today.
Is it this then became normalized. Now whether
that was known or or orchestrated or not,
it still was a used moment. Never let
a good crisis go to waste.
So here we are again.
Rolling in digital Id, real Id, Id 20
20, verification, digital Id, Social credit, all for
your best interest or whatever the narrative is
tomorrow.
Right? Covid 19 immigrants c opioid crisis, terrorism,
whatever
never gets you just angry enough to forget
that it violates your rights and remove liberty.
Also, what's point to something from 20 20?
I found this really interesting by the way.
This is from June 20 second. I posted
this earlier.
This... I posted this in June 20 second.
Donald Trump post this saying, all caps.
In June 20... She should be 20 second.
Do it is 20 second, But june 20
20. Is what Meant to say?
He says in all caps rigged 20 20
election.
Millions of mail ballots will be printed by
foreign countries.
Interesting he says that and others, it will
be the scandal of our times.
Now, this by the way,
is the same timeframe frame where they then
turned around and said that Russia
want it for him.
Oh, no wait. The other way, sorry. 20
16 20 20 was when they say that
he says they stole it for him. My
point is the same thing Ago... I'm funny
out how it's blend together. I don't believe
half the things they say. My point though
is that in 20 16, the argument was
ultimately that Russia got him in power, which
it was ridiculous.
But then the other side, when it's hit
for he says that they she had for
him and they stole the election. I think
both sides sheet every damn time. My point
is that's it's interesting for them to say
him to say at this point, call it
in June
that foreign countries are involved. Because that's not
necessarily what actually went down. It's not the
argument really.
But isn't that the same thing in reversed
that Russia stole the election? It's because it's
all the same game, guys?
I don't know if he knows that or
not, it's up for you to decide, but
how do we not see the overlap And
here's what I said because my mind was
aligned with the Covid 19 illusion at that
point, but it's the same argument, whether it's
about tracing for
pathogen security or about state Ids and terrorism
or whatever narrative. As I said, already setting
in the table for the 20 20 Sci.
Because they all do this. They're doing it
right now, telling you how it's gonna go
in twitter, it's all about setting the narrative.
He says this will likely... This what I
said,
in this tweet. This will likely lead to
calls for some type of, quote, contact
network
for voting
facilitation. Surely, that can be, quote, traced
for verification, Of course, to ensure the election
goes as planned.
Wink wink, contact tracing. Right? The point was
that it's all the same kind of idea
surveillance privacy, tracking
through for whatever the narrative is. So him
doing this led to the kind of conversations
that are now being used to justify what
we're doing? Do you think it was by
design? It's for you to decide.
But I think that's too hard to miss.
And in 20 20, here's what Forbes Road.
How digital identity can help pave the way
for e voting?
Right.
Same time frame. Literally discussing the same exact
conversation, people cheating, and and they were what
they were using statements like Trump's to justify
digital Ids and voting online. The opposite of
what we should want.
Now, to end in general, we recently put
out this clip
Brock me next clip of our show for
both for Rumble and Big shoot and everywhere
else.
Shadow bank, Black rock pushes for total digital
control via Cbd.
When we also highlight the fact that that
Black rock is immensely
immersed in the digital Id push
and the Cbd push.
Make sure you watch this. An important clip.
Here is a art an article from 20
22. Black rock Finances Id now.
Digital Id provider.
They're part of this central game and you're
gonna see where I'm going with this. Here's
a opposed from 20 23
biometric update dot com, digital Id investments are
active. Black rock boosts, allocation in 1 spam,
which is 1 of these companies.
A daisy chain of corporate finances, the world's
biggest asset manager or Shadow bank as they're
called, Black rock has increased its ownership of
a digital agreement security firm 1 fan.
Almost simultaneously.
1 man says it is buying an Australian
storage vault startup named proven Db.
The deal was expected to close by April.
No turns been made public.
Black rock increased its portfolio allocation
in 1 span from 14.4
percent to 5700000.0
shares
to 16.4 percent or 6500000.0 shares, shares in
1 span open trading on January 20 seventh
that a 04:18 dollars and 9 cents. So
1 span secures,
transactions,
with biometrics.
Detects fraud and automate agreements.
So it's the same overlap. Biometric
transactions that's the same kind of conversation we're
getting into. So here they are other 1,
literally funding and an Id now verification platform.
Here they are buying up a massive company
that made major part of what they do
is transactions and verification using biometrics.
It's not a secret what's going on here.
Digital Id investments.
Now,
Rich people weekly made this point after something
I recently said, Actually should the last show
about Black rock.
Says a little additional context you might enjoy
regarding your recent show highlighting Black Rock, Let
you think.
He says,
the driving force behind the Covid pandemic It's
implications and the fe leaders that allowed it.
Here's a quick clip from Donald Trump.
Awesome.
We the greatest economy in the history of
our country.
And we have never done so well with
every everybody was amazed by and other countries
were copying this. We got hit with
Covid.
And when we did, we spent the money
necessary, so we wouldn't end up in a
great depression likes of which we had in
19 29.
Right. So the idea is that, well, we
had to because we would have been in
a great depression.
Why? Because Americans famous mistake, no, because your
government put me in that position, then they
have to point to their fallout as the
reasons to do the next thing that undermine
your privacy and security. It's the same game
every single time.
2008,
same thing. Ever it's all the same game.
As for people weekly highlights the the... Said
watch the short clip until the end and
ask yourself, was the pandemic going to cause
a great depression?
He says banks were failing in 09/17/2019.
Billions were printed to save the banks, but
we're still failing. We covered it briefly the
time. It had nothing to do with the
pandemic or the illusion they're in, It was
just a part of the cycle, 1 that
can be manipulated.
They keep injecting liquidity
until June 20 20.
Sites the wikipedia page you can read. 2
days later.
Trump signs executive order 13887
regarding
modernization va production for pandemic potential flu viruses.
The goal was to, quote, promote faster, more
scalable manufacturing platforms.
Not Trump. Yeah, because Try imagine must known.
Bad guy, you know, they're all... As they
all usher in the exact same thing, but
you point at 1 side and they point
to the other.
2 party illusion, always making us lose everything.
The goal was to remote mrna platforms.
Just like the Mrna platforms, we're primed for
they just needed a sacred populous
scare populous. Excuse me.
He says, it comes
comes the biggest court propaganda campaign ever witnessed
in history of mankind. Some were offered money,
some fame in o'reilly, whatever it was,
everyone they needed took the deal. That's his
opinion, but I happen to agree, the banks
would be saved temporarily at the expense of
our future once again. Always how this works.
He says, without the cares bailout, that's donald
donald trump.
And lockdown downs pandemics to justify it all,
We would have hit a painful, but necessary
recession.
Instead, Trump handed off the keys to think
just like Obama did. They've all been selling
the country out from Under us.
Very very clear.
And that's why I discussed this in 20
20, June sixteenth,
the Covid coup, the Black rock takeover of
American interest where they essentially took over the
treasury, all the debt, all of the
Black rock effectively controls Us interest.
It's alarming.
I mean, it's entire... I think what is
it Bloomberg? We just read?
See if what pops up.
Yep. There it is. Un include this.
Look at this guys. I mean it's funny.
You say this in passing and the average
person is because that's not true. What a
conspiracy theory.
Until you show them the article that literally
reads in think we trust Black rock is
now the fourth branch of government from Bloomberg.
There's no way to misunderstand that. This is
a very real, very obvious reality where this
shadow bank as it is in fact called
with handed the keys.
I mean... It's just it's they just have
narratives to make this sound like it makes
sense.
The point
is a group that is clearly
controlling entity... I mean, even over people Donald
trump, I would argue or musk for that
matter, has fingers in everything they're involved in?
Maybe in the ways ways that you can't
even draw direct lines back to them personally,
but you can see it's there,
and they're pushing Cbd. They're pushing digital. They're
pushing all the stuff we're talking about, which
completely overlaps with exactly what we just showed
you.
And I think it comes back to these
larger stream pulling manipulation.
So when Brick people weekly is highlighting the
fact that this is all about the justification
and through the justification of another 2008 scenario
during Covid 19, illusion or driving through all
the new agendas, which now just simply find
a new excuse. It's important to see that
it's not about left or right. It's not
about Trump or Biden. It's about the real
manipulator,
string,
the people that are above the
illusion that is our government that are in
fact driving most of what's happening. That's not
have to be 1 group 1 entity, but
clearly, I think we all sense this happening.
And... Just case you you see it. I've
show I I forget forgot I even add
this up. Black rock ownership in Modern
or everything for that matter. You know, the
the game goes a long way. Guys,
So I think it's important that we just
be honest with ourselves outside the 2 party
illusion to recognize that whether or not you
care and you should care about people breaking
the law,
immigrants or whoever else,
just because you care about that, do not
allow
the very same people who are always using
what you care about to roll in something
that you know you don't believe in. Just
because it seems to fit the bill in
the moment. It's sid it seems to apply
to what you think they're pointing to.
These are these are these are narrative managers.
There's always a way to connect it with
the thing that they've got you angry about.
Not again, in no way that to say
that we shouldn't care about making sure citizens
are voting. Obviously, the law, I... The point
is these things are the law. And so
we should have uphold that. And it's not
to say that we shouldn't argue that laws
could be unjust or realize that there are
on constitutional laws. My point is just to
say a broad sense that we're staring at
something that makes sense.
And that's why they're using it. In my
opinion to make it seem as if it's
just no 1 logical
would disagree with this bill until you read
in and find out that it's immersed... It's
completely overlap with the entire digital Id infrastructure.
Which mark my words will become clear as
it goes forward.
I hope I'm reaching the people out there
that would otherwise not wanna hear this, That's
always I'm trying to aim at. The people
that are part of this, you know, that
are regulars in this show, I don't need
that's it's not hard to convince you guys.
If I put the facts in front of
you, you see it.
Because your objective because you care about facts
and you don't just full fall into 1
side or the other.
I'm always trying to frame these things in
a way that will reach just 1 more
person out there. 1 more partisan minded person
that goes, oh,
yeah. Makes sense. I finally, I see it.
And then at least just begins to broaden
out their opinion to, beyond whatever the partisan
lines are telling you that day.
I really think that's changing guys. I think
we're getting more people every day to see
this, that's why we're getting attacked more than
ever.
But I am not gonna stop. As always,
we're gonna keep pushing. We're over gonna keep
doing the best we can to inform you
about what's going on around these topics.
So thank you for your support. There's plenty
of ways down below. Please post to the
chat for you guys to support us. We're
gonna need more as we go forward.
I've been trying to kinda of hold off
on getting into all the Bs every day,
but there's more common. There's more we're got
to deal with that Gonna just keep fighting.
I don't think this is gonna go away.
But as I said, you can trust that
I will keep doing this. Yeah. I mean,
if forever there comes a reason where this
is something I'm gonna have to stop or
want to stop you be the first to
know.
Until then, you can get... You can see
me as often as possible because I'm gonna
keep fighting. But it will... My goal still
is to do this as much possible. But
Damn, I'll tell you. Every day, it seems
like something new pops up and some new
problem I have to deal with. It takes
up all my time. Why just think us
exactly the point. Now, So thank you for
your support and understanding.
I know you guys see it. I know
you're helping me reach people every day. Talk
about these things. Sit down and people you
care about and try to inform them in
a very passionate
and
compassionate way.
Without telling them they're stupid wrong. Like, just
trying to find common ground with people that
in most cases genuinely want the good thing.
They think they're fighting for the right thing,
they see it. They've... They're passionate. Just
find ways to show them if you think
you're right that they are misled about what
they're actually fighting for. By So thank you
all. I love you all. As always question
everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Oh, you know what? Actually, Hold on.
Let me grab this really quickly.
I forgot I wanted this... I think I'm
pretty sure I've got this. Hold on. I
wanted to end with this clip because it's
about
Let's see.
What is that called?
There it is. Perfect. I wanna add with
this clip just because I played it at
many times about the... We don't have a
democracy video, but I'm gonna You're see more
as you go forward. I just think it's
very powerful.
And I know we didn't really focus on
the the your vote doesn't translate reality, but
that has to play a factor in this
conversation.
Especially if the whole push is that we
have to stop these people, when that's not
even really what this is about
because their total effect the outcome when I
think it's pretty obvious that we all know
that even if it has some effect that
there's so many levers and manipulation and voter
and voter machine manipulating everything that it's just...
Not the real focus.
That III mean, I'll leave over this video,
you consider it. Think about what these people
are saying, this a Phd, I mean, princeton
study
about whether or not wear a democracy and
guess what they find.
We're not.
They say we have a near 0 minuscule
statistic
insignificant
effect on policy.
That counts as voting in elections to.
So again, thank you for being here. Thank
you for being objective and critical.
I love you all. As always question everything.
Come to your conclusions. Stay vigilant.
For.
Years. I've had this sense that everything I
learned as a kid about how America's government
works is completely wrong. But I had no
idea how bad things act truly were until
I saw this 1 graph.
Researchers at Princeton University looked at more than
20 years worth of data to answer a
pretty simple question. Does the government
represent the people. Now this is what they
found.
This axis here represents public support for any
given idea. On the left at 0 percent,
are ideas that not a single American wants.
On the right at 100 percent, are ideas
that everyone supports.
This axis represents the likelihood of congress passing
a law that reflects any of these ideas
from a 0 to a 100 percent chance.
On this graph, an ideal republic would look
like this.
If 50 percent of the public supports an
idea, there's a 50 percent chance of it
becoming law. If 80 percent of us support
something, there's an 80 percent chance. You get
the idea.
Now most Americans would probably agree that with
a few exceptions, we should be as close
to this ideal as possible.
Unfortunately, the way America actually works, doesn't even
come close.
Take an idea that nobody supports literally nobody,
and it has about a 30 percent chance
of becoming federal law.
Now, take an incredibly popular idea. The most
popular idea this country has ever seen and
there's
also about a 30 percent chance of it
becoming law.
This means that the number of American voters
for or against any idea has no impact
on the likelihood that Congress will make it
law.
Put another way and I'm just gonna quote
the Princeton study directly here, the preferences of
the average American appear to have only a
minuscule. Near 0,
statistically non significant impact upon public policy
So if you've ever felt like your opinion
doesn't matter and that the government doesn't really
care what you think. Well,
you're right.
But there's a catch.
This flat line only accounts for the bottom
90 percent of income earners in America.
Economic elites, business interests, people who can afford
lobbyists,
they get their own line.
Look at how much closer their line is
to be ideal. When they want something, the
government is much more likely to do it.
And when they don't, they have the power
to completely block it from happening. No matter
how much the rest of the country supports
it. They get what they want and guess
who ends up paying for it.
We pay for it with the most expensive
healthcare in the world. We pay for it
with a tax code that's a complete mess.
We pay for it with Internet that's slower
and more expensive with a wasteful spending, a
flounder
education system, a catastrophic drug war, and 1
in 5 American children born into poverty, almost
every major issue we face is a nation
can be traced back to this graph.
How does this happen?
Well, just follow the money?
Right now, it's perfectly legal to buy political
influence in America.
Here's how it works. Let's say a big
bank wants a law that would force taxpayers
to bail them out again if they repeat
the exact same reckless behavior that crashed the
global economy in 2008.
Not exactly the most popular idea with the
public and Congress knows that. That should be
the end of it, but that's where the
money comes in.
It's perfectly legal for our bank to hire
a team of lobbyists, Whose entire job is
to make sure that the government gives the
bank what it want. Months. Then those lobbyists
can track down members of Congress who regulate
banks and help raise a ton of money
for their reelection campaigns
It's perfectly legal for those lobbyists to offer
those same politicians, million dollar jobs that they're
lobbying firm. Then those lobbyists can literally write
the language of this new bailout law themselves
and handed it off to the politician, they
just buttered up with campaign money and lucrative
job offers.
And it's perfectly legal for those politicians to
take the lobby written language and sneak it
through congress at the last second.
So now you've got a law, it greatly
benefits the banks and the whole process can
start over. This is how a bill becomes
a law. A special interest hire some lobbyists
say those lobbyists collect campaign
contributions, offer jobs and then write the laws
that Congress then passes to help those same
special interests.
This happens every day on every single issue
with politicians of both parties.
In the last 5 years alone, the 200
most politically active companies in the United States
spent 5800000000.0
dollars influencing your government.
Those same companies got 4400000000000.0
in taxpayer support, and that's trillion with a
t,
and that's just the top 200.
Never mind every other special interest every union,
every trade association in every billionaire.
Every single 1 of them can use their
money to buy political influence.
You know, there's this idea out there that
this only became a problem after the Supreme
Court's citizens United in 20 10. But the
data goes back almost 40 years and the
results are clear.
Corruption is legal in America.