On the eighteenth of October of 20 22,
the Ema declared officially
that safety pharma
studies were never perform.
Never,
and they were never deemed
necessary that damn vaccine that is deadly.
Known to be dead,
not because of the Mrna,
but just because of the lipids
that
are packaging the,
that all
gene based vaccines.
Independent of manufacturers
produced the same result
in the vaccine.
He has looked at 15
in the last 4 days, the number has
been increased to 17.
Individuals who died after
vaccination. These will be who died at home
at work in the car during their sports
etcetera,
etcetera, etcetera. There's no question now anymore
about what is going on.
And the answer is
in the organs of these people.
In 90 percent, he found
clear
evidence
for
immune self attack by killer
on tissues.
Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Friday aid, 06/07/2024,
I always forget that the opening after that
clip is sped up, like half a step,
and it drives me crazy. But I think
that's an important clip to start with today.
And actually a combination of 2 clips of
doctor Ba.
And I recommend again, you check out the,
amazing interview Taylor Hud h with Doctor Ba.
A long time ago for the last American
bag 1. More than 1, I believe, and
I believe, I've interviewed him as well.
What we're gonna start today with an important,
focus on 1 of the baffled claims and
I'm gonna use that in the title for
a reason.
This 1 is about specific spur motility or
rather the... It's movement
and
22 percent reduction.
And this is baffling
despite the overwhelming body of evidence showing a
overlap fertility problem due to the injections, and
about 45 of the things I could list
off that are currently surrounding you in your
home, the clothes you're wearing, all around you.
But we're baffled, guys were baffled.
Pointing to some arbitrary concept of well visits
and shutting down hospital. I mean, it's just
absurd what they're pointing to.
Doctor Bo, at least the second clip, the
other 1 is a little bit later down
the line, but the the second or the
second half of what I played there to
open.
I believe that was from 20 20. I
mean, for sure, he was calling this out
in 20 20. 20 21, it could have
been overlap right there that when he was
saying that, The point is he was 1
of the earliest, and I always like to
give him credit for this. As far as
I could tell, 1 of the earliest doctors
that were not just going, we see a
problem.
But we're taking the stand and saying, these
are killing people. And every 1 of these
gene based vaccines are dangerous and and and
that's why I overlap with that first part
of. That you need to make the... Under...
You don't understand if you haven't seen it
that that it's not about this or it's
the combination of all these things. But the
point he makes is you don't need any
of the rest of it just the lipid
envelope is dangerous.
Just Mrna is dangerous. The spike for protein
that it makes regardless of what variant at
their pointing is dangerous.
And then any number of other overlaps we've
highlighted that go into some much darker stuff.
Very important that we understand this. I wanted
to do another point on this to start
because I do sense this coming a little
bit right now and I wanna to refocus
some of this stuff. We're gonna do another
quick point about the... Some bird flu overlaps
kind of a follow, a lot of the
stuff to yesterday's
conversation, and then we're gonna get to a
lot of the stuff that we didn't highlight
yesterday. But a couple of additions, of course,
that I think are important, and I will
make a point about the
Un blacklist
conversation for israel, which apparently is exactly what
happened or is happening right now. But shout
or well for highlighting that Israeli coverage of
it because we were well ahead of that
story in in most cases aside from the
Israeli coverage.
And and this... It's important to see that
this is developing in a direction that is
not whatever your thoughts about the Un, and
I have just as many, you know, t
interpretations and concerns about that body,
it's an easily proven fact. What they're doing
and what they've been doing to is Palestinian
children and other places in the world, other
genocide they've been involved with.
Also... Of course, like we talked about yesterday.
We're gonna... I'm gonna,
discuss Ukraine and Russia a little bit that
I wanna highlight some points. Of course, the
2.2
hundred and 25000000 dollar aid package on top
of the billions that have already gone, while,
in any number of other things we'll get
into a lot of this. I won't flush
it out the opening. But the idea that
there's so many things that Americans,
you know, understanding this is your tax dollars
that Americans
outward. Say I mean, both the republican and
denim and democrats want other than ongoing wars
and forever wars, whether it's Trump or Biden.
And yet they just decide otherwise.
This is the reality we need to come
to terms with it. We don't live in
whether you wanna call it a democracy a
representative government. That's not what we live in.
Is if they have the simple power to
just be like, well, we don't care what
any of you thing. Here's what everybody thinks.
Even in Congress, there's pushed back, and we're
just gonna do what we decide is the
right thing.
Now, some people may point at that and
say, well, we want moral leaders that will
do what they believe is right. Until you
realize that that's not even remotely what they
actually think or even what they're actually doing.
It's about telling you that, so you pretend
that they're just making the moral decision.
But then even if you think that's actually
what they're doing, stand back in record eyes
that that's counter to what we're supposed to
believe this is that they are acting the
living embodiment of their
constituencies or of the American people.
That's not even remotely what any... Like, I
mean, I can't... Whether we're talking about polls
from the the height of that conversation to
now or even before,
Americans do not want these wars. They don't
want more endless wars. They've been saying that
since after Iraq, and these are polls from
all sides of the paradigm. And yet. They
just keep doing it. And then you realize
that they're arming neo nazis and they're
ignoring open atrocities while blaming Russia for things
that they're actively doing everywhere. Or the Israel's
is doing more than anyone anyone's ever seen
in their lifetime, while ignoring all of that.
It's it's really... It's hard to
understand and and really accept until you dive
through the story and realize that this is
always what they've been doing.
So citing with the wrong people, if not,
the bad guys if you wanna play that,
you know, binary view,
going with the people that capable of the
worst things because they're easier to control. They're
easy to influence. And usually are the people
that don't wanna be controlled by a foreign
country, the ones that are typically more moderate.
They care about their people's interest are the
ones they do not wanna work with because
they won't just bow to what foreign interests
want. So they go with the bad guys.
This is the history of the Us government,
guys. We need to understand how self evident
this really is.
We're gonna talk about the ceasefire. We're gonna
talk about the un bombing. And of course,
a lot of overlaps around that, the food
aid conversation, which... I mean, the perfect example
that I've been highlighting we're gonna talk about
today where actually now going. I mean, I've
been kind of in pushing the more than
they've ever had in their lifetimes, but that
is what they're actually pushing.
They're actually saying this today. 1 of these
new clips, the new representative. Which Think is
hilarious since they're just going every week. It
seems like a new person's being shoved in
your face because they're just losing
clout with all the manipulation and lies you're
getting caught for, but saying that they have
put more a... I mean, it won't get
to it a second. It's the same point.
How many times they've lied about this and
while children are increasingly starving
right in front of our eyes. And your
government is acting like this is never problem.
There's no crowds being committed. We'll investigate. We'll
get back to you it just never stops.
And there's a million different ways you can
look at this about the idea that they're
Blocking aid in the first place, which everyone
including in the Us is admitted 2, which
makes the arming of them illegal, and there's
everything about this is verifiable wrong. Whether you're
talking about law, morals doesn't really matter.
As that's why. I mean, actually why I
titled it the way I did today,
I... It's just... It's frustrating to me that
we're covering a lot of these stories, and
it just... It... It's in a in a...
We're supposed to pretend that you should break
information, whether it's
independent media or someone much larger, because these
things are around the world. People are talking
about this stuff.
And so we go, okay, they just murdered
all these children. They just bombed a bunch
of foreign aid workers.
Shouldn't that be the end of the conversation?
No, it just keeps going.
And so I... My point is that if
to title something or highlight the information in
the title or break these things down, I
don't know how to title these things anymore.
More conversation of Food aid that they're lying
about, more bombing of schools. You know, I
mean, yes, I could title it that way,
But the point is it's
It just... It seems like... I don't even
know how to word this properly.
It's infuriating that we highlight that they're lying
that they will highlight that they're breaking the
law
We highlight that everyone apparently seems to be
aware of that, except Matt Miller lies about
it. It just keeps happening.
I've said this many times. I don't need
to break this down in the opening. I
just... It's this
block that we're at. And I honestly want
your thoughts on how we get past something
like that. Now I just don't want to
accept that it's that we'd let them finish
their genocide before something actually changes. Even if
that's actually what's going to happen. I don't
believe that. I think they're gonna do everything
they can as hard as they can to
avoid any accountability, like always.
But isn't there... What... I mean, you know
my thoughts the 2 party paradigm, the people
on either side of pointing at the wrong
people ultimately keep this going,
but I feel that everybody else kind of
begins to notice that to some degree.
So how do we get past that? But
more to talk about on that in general,
let me know your thoughts. I think it's
important that we
keep asking these questions and and not just
get reactive to what's current being put in
front of us. We need to seek solutions.
This is why I'm such an... You know,
Derek Bros is such an important part of
Last America Va as well as run running
the conscious resistance, which you should check out.
But I just... You know, really respect what
he does and what he fights for because
he is actively putting out solutions in in
everything that he does, which I do my
best to do as well. But, you know,
we have different focus. I'm more about trying
to break down the I of the lies
that are coming forward, and That's why I
bring people like that into the fold of
Tl lab, so we can have that aspect
of it, because he does really bring the
solution to the table. We need to be
thinking about that and everything that we do.
No, let me know what you think on
that. But... And by the way, he is
gonna be putting out,
today, I believe the second follow to the
Bethany Services,
series They don't be doing more than, I
believe than just the 2 parts.
But I also wanna start with a couple
of opening things before we get into the
the starting point of the Covid 19
conversation or rather specifically the Covid 19 injection
conversation. I wanted to make sure you saw
this follow up.
So which is in regard to Stripe.
I'm I briefly mentioned it yesterday in the
middle of the show, but I wanna make
sure you guys saw this,
So first, it's very clear that they're they're
kinda of come coming after just me. I've
I've even spoke to people and I'm not
gonna call anybody. Because last thing I want
is for somebody to lose as well because
I'm upset that, you know, it's only focused
on me. But I know people that are
doing
exactly the same thing. Not crowd funding or
fundraising, but putting out a digital product, putting
out their their interviews and their shows and
then just instead of going... I'm charging 50
dollars. You just say you give me what
you think it's worth.
Right? That's what we. That's what all of
us do. That's, you know, you can call
it donation based, but it's not just for
nothing. It's obviously value for value. You know,
nod to no agenda in that conversation. It's
important.
And so I know other people that are
using stripe in the exact even using the
exact same plugin that I am, which is
what I heard for... I heard about it
from. No And in some cases bigger than
me
and nothing.
I I hope that doesn't happen to anybody
else. My point is, I feel this is
very focused on me, which just frustrating seems
to happen a lot. And III don't... It's
not because I think it's all about Tea
lab, but I just look around and I
don't see it happening anywhere else. And so
1 I want you I want you to
know that I... We interestingly just engage with
them today. They responded on Twitter, and they're
looking into it apparently despite the fact that
Already gone back and forth numerous times. Don't
feel like it's gonna go anywhere, but I
hope us. I hope I always hope there's
some level of honesty out there and even
within these companies and even within the censorship
tactics,
like the people that just don't believe that's
how they should be doing this.
So My point to say that, I want
you guys to know if you are supporting
us through stripe
or any of the other con tangent connections
to that. Because local, that's what that's what
it uses. I mean, any number of things
that seem like they may be cutting their
access do my access to,
To my point on this is it seems
to be only focused on the direct donations
from my website while allowing the other ones
to continue even through strife. It doesn't make
any sense. It's the same account. And they're
only going after the 1, weirdly enough that
has the same they... You know, it's something
like 3000 dollars a month. We get just
from that. All utilized every month for the
work we put out. To it. Mean, yeah,
I didn't even wanna get into the personal
side. I mean, there's even right now, there's
months where I end up having to tap
to personal to make this stuff happen because
the work is more important to me. Making
sure we get multiple articles of Robert and
Derek and interview some Taylor. And I mean,
all on and on.
The point is that they only go after
the 1
it is about you guys donating or supporting
through funding our work about the products we
put out.
And so if you're doing through so through
skype right now. My advice is to just
don't do anything, not yet, I will let
you guys know right like this in the
beginning of the show if this comes to
a point to where they pull it. At
this moment, it's frozen, and I can't even
take the funds out under the argument that
they're reviewing it again. So maybe that's a
positive thing. I... Hard for me to say
that. But when it comes to a point
to where I I know for sure that
I'm not gonna be able to use it,
the first thing I will do is let
you guys know so you can hopefully find
another avenue to support Tea lab, and I
worry that if we don't say anything that
they'll just keep letting you put money in
there and not give it to me, which
has happened to damn near every other platform
we've been centered from. Patreon Paypal. Right now,
I'll start that I can tell. There are
still people that are signing up for our
Patreon that still get money taken every month.
I've made this point periodically over the years.
I I think it's ridiculous, but I I
shouted that every time and people still let
it go, But in any case,
Let you know what's going on with this
as I understand it. As I just put
it out again, this is what they actually
responded to, I think.
Yeah. They said, hello, here we are responding
to Dms. So I simply said, hey, support.
Can you tell me why to despite proving
in my appeal that what we do doesn't
meet your claim of crowd fund based on
their definition of it. As and I also
added, as you're
integrated with numerous crowdfunding funding platforms,
which doesn't make much sense to me, yet
only seem to apply this to Tl lab,
Remember, they updated this in April.
Just added this weird content creation caveat that
says you're not allowed to crowd fund or
rather take without a digital product, which we
clearly have.
It's not being applied else. This seems to
be specific to only this 1 thing even
though they're integrated with crowdfunding funding platforms. So
explain for me how you're not allowed to
crowdfunding fund except you can use stripe for
crowdfunding funding. Over here on this platform.
You get my point, guys. So this is...
Even if you deem, that's what we're doing,
which it's not. We put out products. We
have in 1 on 1 engagement. We have
interviews. We have all sorts of stuff that
people then
donate to support us through that,
or you could argue pay for those products
in the same way. It's not for free.
It's not for nothing. That's the main point
we're making, and they seem to accept that
in the last discussion we had, but yet
they're still freezing the account. So get this
some reach, share this if you want, get
in front of people. But if you choose
that you you wanna go into the route,
email or rather direct mailing, which seems to
be the safe route right now. Our subscribed
star has never been messed with. Even the
buy me a coffee was just frozen, but
they un froze it. So Just, you know,
I'm concerned about that. You know who knows
what's gonna happen next, but any number of
things that we still have out there you
can use.
Or
cryptocurrency donations or, you know, in the chat,
let me dump those in their chat. You
guys, if you can let them know else
to support us. There's a lot of other
ways. Direct donate on the platforms, like Rumble
and and Rock and plenty of other things.
Any case. I just wanna make sure you
guys saw that. Because I'm... I am worried
about where this goes and to be very
up forward with you guys. If this does
get yank, it's a huge knock for us.
You know, this is what's so frustrating as
I just we just had a very successful
fundraiser, which, by the way, that's the other
angle. This, the gibson and go that I'm
not mentioning. Clearly, which It does seem to
continue to come my way, but that also
utilizes... Oh, no. That goes directly to my
bank account. Never mind. My point was,
give and go. Remember they've seemed to have
been yank my recurring donations. And best I
can tell. I don't wanna say For sure,
but everyone they've engaged with. They've sent me
all of their back and forth and their
banks say there's no problem. Of course, they
could be lying and what the common
denominator is that the people that sign up
for recurring donations don't seem to continue to
or donate to me. They got a message
that says, you have now been canceled.
It doesn't make much sense to me. But
the point is you could go there if
you'd like, and I do to continue to
get at least the 1 time donations through
the gifts and go, but that itself seems
to be shut down in the same kind
of way. God where was I going the
point was that
Yeah. Well, in any case, if you wanna
support us, there's lots of ways you can.
I was gonna make a final point there
about it.
I just am worried about where this go,
oh, that's what it was. That ultimately, we
did this fundraiser. Right? That was important.
And we it it it went very well.
We, you know, we we we hit our
mark and the whole was about getting the
the recurring, which that's why Made that point.
But then right after that, And again, that's
why I kinda went back to... You know,
I was worried about the writing, and I
pulled it back for a second, but then
went right back to it. They're writing just
like they were before because I felt like
we had a good place. I was able
to cover some of the employer fees and
now my point is this knock happens right
after that. Knocking off a huge... Which was
a recurring amount. Which is far worse than
1A1 time thing. And so now I'm worried
about the future next steps about where we're
gonna go with these lawsuits and everything else.
I just want you guys to know where
we're at. And that's not even that's not
even really about trying to solicit donations. It's
just about you guys understanding that I'm very
concerned about where this goes in the future
based on this very clear political and financial
censorship.
But that is what it is. I'm not
gonna stop no matter what. Like I said,
no matter how I have to do this,
I will continue. So That being said, I
wanna make sure you guys understand where we
are.
A couple of other opening points. Just... I
thought this was interesting based on the idea
of where your money goes. We're really racial
highlights.
A tweet from insider paper saying breaking Us
send as we'll talk about in a minute,
225000000
dollar military. On top of all the other
money that's been there, and all the money
we don't see going there. The lot laundering
and and so on.
Social Security, she says it's supposed to run
out by 20 35.
All of our tax dollars get washed through
the ukraine... Through Ukraine or are sent to
genocide to genocide Palestinians.
Israel gets free health care through our tax
dollars. Why are we paying taxes? It's a
good question without all of that? Seeing us
how it's not really about freedom when you're
being forced to pay taxes Don't you remember
at least what we're told we were revolt
from for Britain, you know, the whole
tax taxation without representation?
Here we are. Damn the same thing far
worse today,
but she says sales tax on used items
that... Or rather, this just not even just
income tax, but sales tax on use items
that have already been taxed. We're being manipulated.
Our government is stealing from us every which
way we can look.
And then taking that money and helping foreign
countries commit genocide, and we should really ask
how this works.
And another point about, oh, on and this
was... And it's a funded point. To highlight
this from yesterday a small correction. It was
it wasn't really not... It this was a
point... I made right at the end when
I was briefly going through a lot of
tabs.
That I had. Was just quickly showing you
thought Was gonna get you today. And in
that, I accidentally looking back at it. Highlighted
this as 1 of the things from Gaza.
And it wasn't really that I was confused
about it. I had this up for the
sudan, which we'll talk about later.
But I wanted to make sure this in
case somebody was confused by that. I showed
this talking about the and the things that
were happening in Gaza. And again, that it
was really about the fact that I was
rattling off the points that I was gonna
get to today, and this showed the pictures
in this and this and this and I
went through it. So the... It... Make sure
that wasn't confusing for somebody. This was a
picture from the Sudan, which we will talk
about. We have already talked about a lot.
In fact, in Robert's been covering, but that's
how we roll. We're gonna... If I make
a... Even the smallest mistake and it needs
to be corrected. If I'm aware of it,
I will correct it.
And then just begin, to he'll highlights the
important point that Him genocidal Militia continues to
massacre sudan these civilians, which we've already talked
about.
Imagine the whole thing.
On a daily basis, yet not 1 single
western country has applied a single sanction on
them. Why?
Are these protect internationally by wealthy Ua Uae
sponsors? And the same old narratives go the
Israeli Us support for what they're doing. As
long as they back on stand with the
right side, we'll ignore all the crimes.
What that really means is, you don't really
care about the crimes human rights or law,
you care about your interests and you use
those things as course of tools to get
what you want. But just in case, I
wanna make sure we pointed that out. Now
let's start in this conversation about Covid 19
vaccines and the danger around the Mrna platform
conversation. Now let's start with a clip from
M speaking with Joe Rogan,
and recognizing that this is an important statement.
What he says is important, but it's also
stuff that you've known about
Because of his work, M, really is talking
about this a long time ago, but also
independent media has been incessantly highlighting this stuff.
It's still shocking to me that some people
are still just coming to terms with this
reality. So let's start with this clip.
And this is him just re hit it
reiterating this from April sixteenth by the way,
says I repeat.
So
in the summer towards the end of last
year, second half of last year,
the journal vaccine, peer review. This is like
the highest impact medical journal for vaccines.
Right?
They published a re analysis of Pfizer and
Modern
original double blinded
randomized controlled trial. So this is the level
the highest quality level evidence. Okay? With all
the caveats drug and this sponsored, all that
stuff. Right? But still the what we call
the highest quality level of evidence.
Done by independent researchers,
Joseph Freeman,
from Louisiana, he's yard doctor clinical data scientist,
associate editor the Bm Peter Dos, Robert Kaplan,
from Stanford. Right? Some very eminent
in terms evidence of integrity. Right? I'm not
for eminent based medicine, but I'm for people
who have emma eminent of integrity. Right? They
publish 3 analysis.
And what they found was this,
in the trials that led to the approval
by the regulators will get to regulators in
a minute around the world.
You are more likely
to suffer a serious
adverse event from taking the vaccine,
hospitalization, disability life changing event
than you were to be hospitalized with Covid.
So what that means is,
it's highly likely
This vaccine Mrna her vaccine should never have
been approved for a single human in the
first place, and that rate of serious adverse
events, Joe is 1 800, and it's at
least 1 800 because that just covers the
first 2 months of the trial.
It's,
in general, what happens is drug companies design
trials where they choose people who are less
likely to get side effects, so they're generally
healthier.
Right? And then because it's the first 2
months, and I found the mechanism of harm
with accelerated heart disease,
like my dad died 6 months after 2
doses of the vaccine, and we have autopsy
studies now showing that that that's what's happened
that can happen several months after.
Yeah. It it's it's just... It's beg belief.
And,
and that, you know, I I publish this
information and then been an evolution So the
question now, I think people... What we wanna
do, Like, we talk about statins. Right? Same
sort of thing. Same sort of concept concept.
What is your individual benefit in absolute terms?
This is all stuff that we've talked about.
Right? I mean, it's it's very important to
see
how clear this has been.
And and this is what's so important is
All these... I see these tweets all circulating
and people that are somehow just waking up
to this or acting like it's a new
story. You know, we... How did you know
they were dangerous in the ver... When they
first came out?
Because we read the science because we looked
at, not not just blindly trusting what it
said, looking at all of it, and you
realized then if trusting the science meant blindly
ignoring everything except the 1 that went your
direction, pretending that's what that we were doing.
No. We looked at the trial data. We
looked at all the peer reviewed evidence, including
the things that we're saying the it in
the body was clear from the beginning
or the idea that what he's highlighting is
that... And this is 1 that I'll I'll
show right here. This is 1 that we've
highlighted many times.
And this is about the second... This is
what he's talking about. In fact. And this
was at least 1 of the times this
happened.
The serious adverse events of special interest following
these injections in randomized trials. The point is
there was a secondary analysis of the
phase 3 randomized trials. And this is exactly
the point he's making. That the... Are still
associated with excess risk
of, it's in here somewhere 1 and 800
is what they break this down as. But
the point was the excess risk of serious
adverse events founding your study points to the
need for a formal help benefit analysis, In
other words to say that we need to
reevaluate how safe these are because they're killing
people, and it's obvious. This is the data
that is unbelievably clear. It's about the Pfizer
part of it in here that was obvious.
Where was it?
Yeah. There it is. Well, so, basically, the
point that I've made in the past, and
that this is where you get that number
from,
the Pfizer trial exhibited the trial. This is
their phase 3 data. 36
percent higher risk of ser adverse events
between the vaccine group and people that didn't
take. You have a 36 percent. Higher chance
of getting
hospitalization, death or permanent disability,
if you took the injection versus not taking
it. That's what they're talking about.
Don't include this as well. Alright. We've talked
about all of this many times. But so
just interesting to hear this
very clear reality that people are still grappling
with. And as we just highlighted, doctor test
Lowry
points to this telegraph, whereas they they're engaging
with that's going
Part Covid vaccines could be partly to blame
for the rise in excess debt that we
all know it's explicitly related to.
But reason I point that out is because
here's another 1. Aussie 17 points to the
Herald son. This is from yesterday.
Australia's highest circulation newspaper. Or reports, Covid vaccines
have a link to global mortality spike. Yeah.
Because they have an obvious connection to it.
There's... It's... Statistically speaking, it's undeniable.
Of course, it's always possible it's something else
that behind the anomaly just, but clearly, any
investigative journalist, any reporter detective. It's
undeniable.
That the overwhelming
perfectly aligned increase in mortality, excess death and
so on. And every other problem is perfectly
aligned with the increase of these... In these
injections.
But here more more and more we're seeing
even the corporate media. Go, well, maybe oh,
maybe there's a link there. Yeah. It's clear.
This is about release valve trying to vary
this in just a maybe small kind of
thing, you know, like the super super super
rare micro risk that we now know is
not so super rare at all. That's how
they start this every time.
But here's the point we're gonna talk about
in 1 angle of this. Just so we
know. Very clearly, these things are hurting people
in a thousand different ways, and that's not
hyper.
Robert Mina highlights, the telegraph. The same telegraph
that's going, oh, maybe there's a link now
saying this on the other side of it,
lockdown was meant to save lives, but in
put the future of mankind at risk. Both,
the lockdown downs did? The lockdown downs are
the reason your fertility and productivity you're down,
but lockdown downs That's what they're saying. He
says hiding and plain sight. How Mrna covid
vaccines were designed to reduce fertility. Now you
can disagree with the fact that they were
designed that way. Frankly, I think there's more
accurate than anything else. It's an opinion.
Even though I do think that there's an
a lot of evidence, not proof, but evidence
that points in the direction like any investigator
would actually be doing, pointing to where the
evidence leads that this was deliberate.
I even were argue from, like a mathematical
perspective, I find it near in possible that
you could accidentally make this many mistakes that
air on the side of maximum harm in,
I just think that's impossible personally. So I
agree. I think that at some level, this
was partly designed or experiment or, you know,
disregard for any of the possible side effects
in the interest of an experiment. You know,
how you to look at. So let's look
at this actual study. Thank you for nadia
for linking it.
Oh, and they remove the link. I see
I swear so strange. I have right here.
So strange to me How it seems like
it's almost in line with right when I
go live and all of a sudden the
highlighter which you guys don't need to waste
time and hearing that. Just you just deletes
itself. It's so strange. Many case, somebody recommended
this me, which I now do. I take
screenshots every time, which seems like a redundant
waste of time, which it drives to be
crazy, But here's what it says. This week,
I can... Now that I see what is.
We can just look at it right here.
It says this week, what they're highlighting is
this weird story about, you. In 20 22,
the scientists just discovered some strange thing. Which
by the way, that in and of itself
should be
interrogated,
why are they claim that there was some
random thing where people can't became allergic to
their orgasm which caused them to have some
kind of a decline and I... Something does
not sound right about that to me. But
in case 20 22, right at the peak
of their genetic manipulation, But that's another topic.
It's related. And they just make this point
to go look. That's what was going on
over here this week, however, as out it
starts. Scientists discovered something that sounds even more
alarming.
Than being allergic to or ketchup. I don't
believe that, But it says since the of
the pandemic, they found the quality of our
sperm has plummeted
All these weird and different and unique angles
of
decreased
and decreased fertility and and it's all baffling,
isn't it? Only to people being real ignorant
about what we're seeing. It goes on to
say, to be specific. It's motility, meaning the
way it moves.
This is the ability and and what it
actually specifically means is
capable of motion relating to or characterized by
responses that involve muscular rather than audio visual
sense. So by the way, it can move
around. And says that is the ability of
individual sperm to swim has declined by an
astonishing 22 percent.
Just so happens to be perfectly align with
the injections that were given.
But what could be the reason they ask
for this pre in unexpected fall?
What do you think they're gonna say? Well,
here's the scientist leading theory.
I'm curious to see if they've asked all
scientists or they just frame the scientists as
the couple they asked to our very pro
vaccine. Right? But it says a combination of
lockdown and working from home
Okay. So lockdown downs and working from home
if caused your sperm to stop swimming.
I'd love to hear the logic on that.
Well, it's it's stupid as you might expect.
There's really... It says their professor Alan Casey
from University of Manchester.
Said, quote, there's not really a lot of
evidence that the virus affect sperm. So we
thought about what else have changed it and
time and course.
Everybody's sitting at home, not going to work,
probably doing less exercise. And there we go.
Big bang boom. It must be that.
Very scientific or the thing that directly affects
your fertility, not just to shot the dark
though, but I'm not a scientist, You know?
I mean, it's it's infuriating how stupid this
is. Of course, you could argue these things
have a part effect to that. But to
pretend like, we're just gonna go well, this
is the 2 things that happened during that
time and ignore everything else and go must
be lockdown downs and just laziness.
You mean like there's never been a time
where we can align those same possible out
of the circumstances in the world that people
haven't been locked in or been not working
from... I mean, come on, it's it's childish
stupid.
They know that, guys, I'm telling you, there's
no way that they're not going what about
the injection that we all know has been
reported to have fertility problems. And that's not
just a conspiracy theory, guys. So let's point
that out.
Well, first of all, here's many different times,
just adult 2 of, but we've covered it
many times. 20 21, May t. Infer fertility
risks of Covid 19 injections, This is not
some hyper symbolic discussion. This is citing peer
reviewed science, and which I'll show you their
own documents.
But these scientists are baffled.
Here.
Doctor H,
interview, Covid 19 vaccines infer fertility and spike
protein dangers. It's a good interview for, like,
interviewed him back on... Oh, no, excuse me.
I it was taylor. I thought it. I
guess I think I interview as well, but
May 20 21.
And here's doctor Peter Mc.
February 20 23,
Women have been told they are crazy for
2 years. Now,
the Eva project data comes out.
Which shows you 78 percent have menstrual have
men administration impacted by the Covid injection.
Concerning are the clotting and bleeding and fertility
risks.
Right.
Well, I mean, I just interested to tight
you could agree this as 1 of many
many different peer reviewed studies that you can
find talking about this.
Doctor's appeal and, I don't know how to
pronounce that, but this the doctor's appeal account
highlights,
the number of birth in Sweden has now
been at a record low for 24 consecutive
months. What does that align with? What do
you think? An exact correlation with the potential
impact of Covid 19 injections on fertility. The
statistics for 20 23 are now complete and
show the lowest birth rate in Sweden's history.
But we're baffled guys.
It's just like they're baffled over there. They're
not even dealing with the same topic, but
weirdly. They both laid to the same outcome.
G were baffled.
Every month for more than 1.5 years when,
you know,
I think you get the point. I mean,
I it's just it's
almost like it's wasting your time. It's... We
all... I think it's obvious what's happening here.
And I'm not saying we should ignore other
overlapping possibilities.
But to pretend like this is not the
key culprit
and we're just getting into. Right? Mean, I
could make an entire 2 hour show about
the data around this 1 topic. Here's Brett
Levy. Peer reviewed science tech vaccine mrna and
the milk of black hitting moms shortly after
the injection. Raises concerns about baby's exposure to
the mrna b breast. So now you can
overlap this with not just the fact that
it's
you know, flooding through their body, which will
affect the overall fertility,
but then even the idea of neonatal death.
Or infant for mortality and, you know, or,
sudden infant death syndrome, and all these all
these catch all terms they just used to
hide vaccine side effects.
Here
is a an important kind of,
overview,
high birth birth rates plunge in heavily documented
countries. And it's all data taken directly from
government databases. It's it impossible to ignore the
overlap, the correlation.
It's exactly what you're looking at.
Here is
directly from community.
This is Pfizer
distribution,
specific as you could see, BT162.
So this is the general... Like, remember it
became BT162BNT162B2,
and then there was the other 1. Right?
Those... And so BT162
is kinda like, the main
base form and then they they... Ended up
making 2 from that. So My point is
in any sense of these.
You're any of the variations they're in, what
they showed you. And that this is from
what was it. Let me just do this
real quick so I just scroll up. Oh,
dang it. I just damn it. Hold on.
Now I... I don't have to scroll up.
I just accidentally refreshed it for the podcast.
So here we are.
And this will that I believe
20 21,
it's really irrelevant
the time necessarily, but I just trying to
find a date on it real quick.
I believe this is 20 21. But either
way, it's it's early in the conversation, they're
putting this out in regard to the pharma
testing.
Here's what we're gonna show you. I know
where it is.
Remember this,
this is about the total lipid
concentration.
This is their own study. This is before
it was masked given to people in the
world.
And what they find.
Specifically, your o overused, women
have 1 of the highest concentrations. So if
we're told that the this stays in your
shoulder muscle. And this is Huawei we're making
that claim. Their own data approved that was
wrong because look at all these overlaps because
lipid nano particles were the thing that in
encapsulated the instructions to make spike protein. So
this stuff ended up all over your body,
which is why we find spike protein, mrna
and the rest of it, everywhere in the
body and these people that are tops. But
12.3,
that's the concentration after 48 hours in the
o. The other high... The other highest 1
was I believe the
which 1 was it? The spleen, 23.4.
But point is though you can prove and
as Doctor Ba tells you that's the... In
his opinion, the most dangerous part, that's in
your o is. 1 of the highest concentrations,
same for men.
And on that point, here is the predict
the pregnancy index from the mrna for Modern
conversation. And we've shown you this many times.
I found this to be 1 of the
most baffling
not to use their word to against them
because of how obvious this is, but really,
I shouldn't even use badly dishonest. They
hid this from people because they didn't like
what it showed.
What it says is, they administered this experimental
shot to rats,
and it was associated
with
effects that were, no,
fit thin fur cover, swollen pine limbs,
limited usage of the Hi limb, but it
says there were no
related effects on female fertility. They say that
right there. Let me show you something.
Embryo Fed and post survival growth of development,
they said no. But it says, the mrna
1273.
That's the main 1 they're giving,
was limited to... It says,
we're limited to an increase the number of
fe with common skeletal variations of 1 of
the rib not nodes and 1 or more
wavy rib. So you're having immediate outcomes on
the the way there's skeletons formed, but this
is the point that It stood out to
me the most. It says,
trying to cut to the chase. However, such
a risk considered low in humans given the
non why it says the
the overall pregnancy index is the point was
numerically lower, why in those that got the
injection versus those that did not.
So what you're looking at is it's saying
that you have a pregnancy index, a general
overview percentage of whether, you know, you're I
don't know exactly translate to, like, how successful
a pregnancy would be. It's a it's an
an index about, you know, whether there's an
effect on pregnancy. Right?
And it says the numerically lower index for
those that took the mrs, mrna 1273
was 84 1 percent female rats compared to
those that didn't get it 93.2.
You're talking about almost a 10 percent decrease
in pregnancy index.
But they go well because that's within the
range of 75 percent or lower,
we just don't make it a big deal.
I would argue as I did the entire
time that women
probably care about a 10 percent reduction in
pregnancy index, especially if they might already have
issues.
But you didn't tell them this. You hid
this from them, and then stressed that pregnant
women should take it no matter what.
Because you guys are monsters.
Here is just the basic commodity,
risk assessment sheet. We've shown many times, which
showed you the safety of the vaccine for
pregnant people is not known because they weren't
included in the studies, which usually is the
case. The point is that they didn't know.
They pushed in our pregnant women, knowing a
decrease in pregnancy index, knowing all the other
much bigger and serious problems, and didn't even
decided to find out.
Like every other thing we talk about.
Or we can highlight how Scotland just ignored
the obvious and gigantic problem of newborns dying.
Neonatal death, even even pre. I mean, all
of the different angles of this and
what they say. Remember, this is what Bbc
high highlighted. 20 21,
investigations into Spike and newborn deaths. Well, what
they do. They came out and said, well,
we know it's safe, so we're not even
look you know, vaccine he.
Yes, I'm para, but that is exactly what
the actual outcome was.
We're not gonna look because vaccine he and
because we know it's already safe.
Despite the fact that there's an obvious anomaly
in the spike... Right, it's just... This is
disgusting. This a massive cover up. And it's
still happening, by the way,
Oh, how about the
effects of just nano particles by themselves.
Here's 2018.
I made a big point about this right
in the beginning.
Potential adverse effects of just nano particles, not
nano technology...
I mean, there is an overlap, but just
nano particles and what are what are 1
of them, well, lipid nano particles.
Which is 1 of the things that are
discussed in this. And yes,
they have a clear pro effect on
according to Nih and, plenty of other studies.
Okay? How about the idea of glyphosate?
Right? So let's just we're not even talking
about vaccines anymore. How about just other things
that we're we're baffled. Right? So they're going
we're baffled about what could of caused this
drop in.
So we'll just pretend it was lockdown downs
and laziness.
Meanwhile, there's glyphosate will say everywhere in the
clothes you're wearing in the air you're breathing
and the food you're eating, but that can't
be it. Right?
Well, the study says it can, but they...
They're baffled still because the scientists are unaware
of all of this science,
probably not.
Here's
just about herbicides.
This is from Pursuit. This is from 2000
where was it?
I looked at it earlier.
Where'd did that go?
Why these are so difficult to find sometimes.
Or why some places just don't include it.
But in any case, the point is it's
not about the date. It's simply showing you.
Safe in quotes, herbicide and Australian water affects
mail fertility.
But we're baffled still. We're only get a
point that lockdown and laziness even though we've
got all of these very clear overlaps to
fertility, 2006.
Pesticides.
Herbicides, aside, exposure, the hormonal function of the
female reproductive system disrupted, answers yes.
Or how about just P fast? We've already
shown you this, exposure to P fast.
What's suddenly aware of even though they've been
to conceal this reality for decades,
Well, guess what. It can reduce women's fertility
by 40 percent.
But over here, we're baffled. Right? You know,
you, you know, clearly, you could show P
fast and children's toys and things you're on
your body
it's everywhere.
And yet they're only like, lockdown downs laziness.
That's all we can conclude. We're great scientists.
It should be embarrassed. It's clearly about politics,
guys,
or how about this clip? Remember this? This
is about the trans overlap with the Puberty
blockers, which what did they do? They caused
infer.
People.
And the other issue that's a shows stopper
now for many parents around giving consent to
Puberty blockers is the fertility issue.
That if the child goes straight from puberty
blockers
directly to cross sex hormones,
they, at this point in history
are pretty much forfeit
their fertility.
Oh, well, that's okay though because, you know,
can make their own choices when they're 12.
Right? I mean, this is this is the...
And the course now we've already highlighted that
they've all rolled this back at least publicly
and saying, well, they're dangerous. We can't give
them now. Yeah. That's where we were saying
3 years ago. I'm glad you're now paying
attention even though you've already pushed us on
half the population of the world. I mean,
that's that's an over point, but I or
rather an a hyper quality point. I don't
believe it's half. But my point is they
push this on a lot of people who
can never take that back. And yet we're
still pointing to lockdown downs and laziness
great work scientists
or really just the ones lying about it.
Here's chief nerd, highlighting other angles of the
danger around these injections. Doctors across the Us
are reporting an alarming health trend in the
wake of Covid pandemic.
Since about 20 21. They've been noticing a
rare and unusual
cancers
in patients who shouldn't fit the bill. And
young without family history disease. And you know,
what we're baffled guys were baffled.
Same point.
Rare unusual. You know how many times? Just
do a quick search for,
you know, anything. Turbo cancers, rare cancers, it's
exploded
perfectly in line with the injections being given.
And just the 1 thing I'll include since
you already know this is a great breakdown
from the Swiss Policy research.
Covid vaccines of cancer. The main point being,
it's been shown that up to 50 percent
of people that took the injection can induce
a temporary immune suppression.
No as immune dis regulation or lymph,
which then causes if you have an issue
or even without it an explosion of the
very thing that causes cancers. And it is
very easy to see, but we're baffled.
Here's Aussie 17, highlighting another angle this, which
is very easy to prove as well. A
lot of great and highly respected doctors and
scientists have proven this already. That's why this
1 is not necessarily the peer reviewed science.
It's just a continuation of the very pro
reality. This is just another angle of this,
an individual
and it's... The doctor I believe is this
doctor here, David j Sp.
Phd.
This is his research around the very same
point. Right? Just showing you that it's now
independently shown It's proven by studies,
doctor, it's Ken Mc
is... Has been 1 of the ones that
really broke this down early.
It's
everywhere. We've talked about the Dna contamination. We've
talked about the protein folding. We've talked about
the t spike proteins. I mean, my god,
Sounds like a pretty deliberate problem. Doesn't it.
And guess what? They're not stopping they're making
more, including for bird flu. Now Dna contamination
confirmed an Australian Pfizer and vials. It says
they've over 350
times above the dose limit set by the
T. It's pretty consistent as I understand it,
including the Us work.
This is where we are. Most of you
already know this. It's not news to you
guys. The problem is that this is still
being done. It's like an point I made
about the Israel in the beginning.
We don't... It's it's all been... Not it's
not even just the narrative versus what they're
saying or independent media versus what the mainstream
is saying. This is the study, the science
that is out there. Peer reviewed leading science
across the board on damn near every claim
that they called conspiracy theory. Most of which
have benefited by the very people screaming and
it was conspiracy theory. My
blood class heart attacks, all of it.
Super super rare. They're still pretending that's the
case. Even though you can prove it's not,
1 in 800 serious adverse events, and the
data peer reviewed showing you this was less
than the flu to begin with. If it's
even there at all. All of this is
very easy to prove using the very peer
reviewed science they told you to trust.
And yet, they're still doing it. Or the
fact that I showed you yesterday, the actual
platform itself with a peer reviewed study was
shown to be the problem and at least
1 of the problems, and that's what concerns
me so much about this next topic, and
I'll include this article, which many that you
should check out, but the study, peer reviewed
finds the mrna platform itself is driving my.
You, I don't forget that they literally worked
on trying to make a coronavirus, create my
in using it infecting rabbits and then making
it a self spreading vaccine, the case of
China, this is all verifiable work from Ralph
Barr, don't North Carolina University of Chapel Hill.
I've covered it many times on the show.
There's own sciences own curriculum,
but getting into this next part,
the bird flu discussion.
So let's not forget. Now, again, I'm also
I I've said this many times, and I
hope it's always there, And you understand that
I'm also very on guard about the idea
that this could be Like, the my point
is the the conversation of whether it leaks
from a lab or it was created and
then accidentally. How are you look at it?
I'm also very un guard to whether that
could be ploy to hide than not even
there.
Or any number of overlaps therein. So just
because we highlight what they're reporting, it's important
to consider that this is not just about
saying. That's what's happening.
It's about reporting that has been put out
from within, you know, arguing from within their
narrative. There's an important part to that. While
continuing to stand back and go Maybe it's
not there at all Maybe viruses don't exist.
Ask yourself these real questions. They're not invalid.
It's not conspiracy theory. There's very important reasons
that we should be
interrogating that topic. I am still of the
mind that I just don't think it's a
sound as a lot of people pushing it
sale as it's absolute.
I think there are still an overlaps and
anomalies and then, you know,
areas that I don't think I've been defining
enough for me to say 1 or the
other. That's my personal opinion. And of course
I could be wrong. But Josh
Josh W highlights this. The art article from
April 20 23 details a significant safety breach
involving a lab created H5N1
influenza virus, and this is what Doctor Peter
Mc was highlighting yesterday.
At least I shown it yesterday,
at the University of Wisconsin, Madison Influence Research
Institute in December 2019.
It says the incident occurred
during an experiment where ferrets were exposed to
a highly controversial lab engineers 3 of H5N1.
Avian influenza virus. The breach involved a researcher
in training,
whose personal air purifier,
the hose became detached,
potentially exposing them to the virus.
Or this is what we're being told anyway.
Despite the high risk nature of the research,
efforts were made to downplay the incident, avoid
notifying health authorities and over... Side bodies and
keep the public from policymakers makers uninformed. Now
1 thing I was responding with somebody about
this in the chat who were saying do
we even know this is real. You know?
And the point is, well, it it's that
and this was specifically about whether viruses were
real. Now my point is always about, well,
you know, we've got the overlap of the
conversation. And I know this even divided within
the terrain theory. Crew of discussion or the
people that,
endorse or believe in that,
that bacteria is a real part of that.
Some disagree
My point is there are some of the
leading people in that discussion that argue bacteria
is real and the point being bacteria have
proteins, and proteins like we talk about the
spike protein can shed and and so on.
Right? So or virus sized transistors, nano technology.
My point is that call it whatever you
want. I think that's irresponsible to ignore what
they're working on in these labs. I think
it's very easy to prove that they're doing
something.
So if we argue that's not what it
is, well what then, you know, I think
it's to just say it's that is no...
Those don't exist. So ignore it. Well, what
are they doing? What's happening in those labs
and what are they working on? I think
that there is something happening there, which, of
course, may not be the case.
I think that's the case, I think that's
pro.
So the question should be, what is it?
If it's not a virus, then they're still
making something that it didn't use to get
people's. Sick to spread, and then you could
debate all those different things, but we should
be interrogating what they are doing in there,
not just going it's all of fabrication.
Ask that, sick But inter, question everything we'll
consider all possibilities.
It says, the article also highlights the history
of safety lapses in the same lab.
Including a 2013
incident where a researcher accidentally pierce their finger
with a needle containing an engineered at H51
virus,
So if you believe that these things are
there, you could... I mean, it seems very
easy to point out these things could been
accidentally or deliberately put out in the world
a long time ago. It says the earlier
incident revealed that the lab did not have
the dedicated quarantine facility contrary to what they've
been communicated by the Nih. You could also
argue that the flu discussion in and of
itself
is because of something like this.
This says this isn't the only place these
gain function experiments have been conducted though. These
are the labs that need to be viewed
as potential culprits of any claim bird outbreak.
As mentioned, he says, the university of Wisconsin
Madison Influenza Research Institute, led by
vi neurologist, Eu
Ka Ka,
This lab had been involved in creating Tri
viruses has that gained the ability to spread
through the air between ferrets. A model for
human influenza transmission, which very well could be
what we're talking about. The...
The at the Eras eras must University Medical
Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands led by vi Ron Fu,
has lab... This lab also created modified H51
viruses. Like, the we're even pretending this is
an acceptable thing. In any case, now or
before. They're they're still doing this stuff. It's
verifiable. They even started it up again with
Eco health or with the with peter das.
Now where that is now, I dump up
in the air based on what was just
going on with is, you know, being called
out and so on, but They did start
it up again, and it is still happening
despite what Fauci says.
It says the... The Cdc has also conducted
gain function experiments on bird flu at the
national center for diseases in Atlanta, the Usda,
Southeast poultry research laboratory in Athens, Georgia has
done serial passage research on bird flu and
the emergence of B313 is linked to research
conducted with H5NX8N5NXK2344,
which is... There's these different categories of it.
Not only that significant mutations found in recent
human cases such as other the things they're
claiming, suggest connection to the experiments.
So, of course, again, my point is, we
should be on guard to whether this is
bread crumbs to lead us into the manipulation.
Ask yourself that, consider that, but also consider
whether this might just be their clumsy in
incompetent efforts to make something for their own
interest experiment and so on and be we're
now paying attention more through the Covid 19
agenda it's easy to trace back.
I'm not sure where I stand. Bookmark this,
he says and remember when this comes out
with the new pandemic. I hope that's not
what happens. Here's an article for Usa today.
Showing a lab created bird flu accident shows
lacks, oversight of risky gain of function research.
2019...
Oh, it's gonna. That's 2023.
I thought he said it was 2019, but
in any case,
still happening. The fact that that's even happening
at 2000, okay. That's... It... So the article
is 2023,
they're highlighting a breach from 2019. Now, ash
that that ended of itself a good point.
So we're now only... We're now talking about
it. 2019.
Maybe that's exactly what this all was for
all we know. I mean, that's the kind
of manipulation when they can't wade down the
line. And go look back at this story.
I think there's a reason for that. Now,
Peter Mc, Doctor Peter Mc highlights thought what
we just pointed out from doctor. Burke saying,
we need to test all the cows with
Pcr tests
absurd.
He says does doctor. Bi know the put
the pro a origin of the current bird
flu outbreak is a government research lab. Why
is she pushing for mass Pcr testing of
healthy livestock could drive up the false positive
case count animals?
Probably. Could it be to force
for both that human, H51
vaccinations, and he highlights this pre print?
Proxima origin of epidemic highly pathogenic avian influenza
HN1,
and and he's the point he just made.
That you can trace this back to these
laps if you believe that's the reality. But
I think what's important to understand is that
this is the at least... This is even
the claims of their own like, their ex...
I think it was the spa pandemic, practice
the
exercise
within that itself, 1 of arguments is they're
caught for lying about X y and z
or hiding this from the public in their
own exercises they put those stuff in there.
It's obvious. This is what's happening.
That they're lying about this is my point.
You could argue that this isn't self with
the lie, but I think it's clear that
they're working on something. That's why I said
that to begin with. So if you can
trace this back to whatever they're doing in
that lab.
I mean, I think this is... And and
this... By the way, this includes John Leak
and Peter Mc mccoy, John Is we we've
interviewed him with Doctor. Peter Mc. And I
think it's important work to consider.
Here. I'll actually add that and the links
so you guys can have that.
Now here's what that Rad court says about
the direction it seems to be going for
the bird flu. And realize this could go
in this direction for dam near or whatever
they want using Pcr tests. He says they
rolling out another Pcr pandemic. The new virus
we found a spread globally by testing sewage,
milk farm animals, Pcr test will be said
to detect a specific molecular sequence without ever
demonstrating specificity or calibration using a pure standard
sample of the computer inferred molecular fragment. Not
to mention, demonstrating that the said molecular fragment
is uniquely associated with the new pathogen. All
development will be
performed for profit without any cumbersome
independent validation since professional independence was a abolished
decades ago. The cure will be patented mrna
vaccines, which will not need to be safe
or effective because pandemic. Thus, health and the
food supply will be protected.
Some Sarcasm.
Mean, this guys, it's hard to see it.
That's where this is going and and exactly
what they've already done. And on that note,
which we've already highlighted for you, a while
ago, this is what's happening.
Pan researchers develop experimental mrna, Avian flu vaccine.
Right? So as we were just highlighting the
other ones they were talking about,
Not just the new Covid direction or the
other bird flu claims that the Us government
was already or bird flu injection claims that
they were
funding
that were the older version of the mono
veil. This this is an active
mrna direction. So the point is if they're
doing this, it's hard... It's, I mean, near
impossible that I think they're gonna go with
the old 1.
Just like the other conversation, and it'll be
even more if we're not even in some
height of a pandemic illusion that we're just
at the going it may happen
So quick, let's use this 1 without human
testing to make sure that we're getting ahead
of it.
We all know that's a logical thing. And
that's not logical, but they would see it
as a
based on their,
it'll, you know,
constructing of this narrative and the way this
should be going forward.
We know that's within their possibility.
The idea that, well, we, it's the platform.
Just like with the Covid overlap, we just
plug in the new thing and we pump
it out. We don't need safety testing.
We know this is where it goes.
The question is whether they want to pull
this trigger.
Promising preclinical results suggest mrna vaccine platform
could limit the impact of avian flu pandemics.
You mean the ones that haven't happened
Remember, we just showed you this by the
way. Actually I'll include this as well seeing
this element of points to the other 1
at the end of this segment,
where in the double... In this, the W
who from 2011,
called the previous 1,
av b and H5N1A
pan a... A part of a culture of
fear.
Repeated pandemics pandemic health scares caused by a
culture of fear.
They called us out. They said these were
not real. Both pandemics of fear The exaggerated
claims a severe public health threats stem primarily
from disease advocacy by influenza experts like Fauci
like Bi,
This is the reality. You realize they still
point an H51,
this 1 and act like it was a
huge pandemic.
They're lying, guys, every part of this.
So here's the nature study, which weirdly enough,
not that this matters for the show today,
but
I'm not able to highlight anything on this
page
or use the use the highlighter that I
normally, you know, the app I have
strange to me.
Other nature articles I can, but not this
1. I just think it's strange. So I
just found... Wanted to include this because this
is the current 1 from A 20 third.
I was able to highlight the pre print.
But it's definitely not a prep print anymore.
It is peer reviewed. It is published in
nature, but I wanna show that first. Development
of a n side modified mrna vaccine again
specifically K2344BH5,
highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Oh, it's highly
pathogenic. I think we're just talking about the
fact that it's not really hurting anybody. It
seems to be spreading.
At least that's what we're told anyway. But
here's the development of this, and here's some
important things that I plucked out of this.
Actually, I wanted to search really quick for,
let's see. What was it?
Of the things we were relate from last
time. It was the
Meth.
No. We're not seeing those in not yet
anyway. And this comes into the... The point
was Wanted to look for whether or they're
talking yet about the, you know, n 1
meth pseudo
modification, which that's what the mod Rna is.
May do that actually.
Interesting. So what I argue because these are
the same things.
These are these are shots using
modified, that's what that means. N modified Rna.
Right? So the fact that they're not discussing
that, at least as as far as I
could tell.
See. I mean, it's pretty limited in the
study. I mean,
because it's just in their argument. It's already
defined. It's already clear. It's already safe and
effective. It's not true.
That was 1 of the most problematic aspects
because the modified Rna, not organic mrna, but
modified Rna
And 1 meth pseudo modified Rna is 1
of the reasons this continues to spread around
the body and stays much, much longer, which
is then why these things are all over
your body in the autopsy.
But my point is they're not even getting
into that detail anymore, but it says highly
pathogenic an influenza viruses, They're just highlighting it
from H5K234
before, or 4 p. Excuse me. Are circulating
at unprecedented high levels.
Are they?
Mean, why do we even take these thing
to face value? Now what they're talking about
is in wild birds,
well, as far as you could tell, it's
just a bunch of hype around what might
be happening?
Doesn't mean. You know, the point is you
individually have the right to be concerned or
not about your own interest. Not the idea
that they need to force something on the
population based on the hype of a coming
fear, even though we know they've done this
more than once already, according to Who and
plenty of others. Or, you know, just looking
quickly back at what the
endless amount of lies that transpired during the
Covid 19 illusion. We have to do this
for the safety everyone will they lie. Guys,
they lie. We all know that. Even the
1 pretending they don't know that they actually
know that. Because they all stop taking the
shots.
Here's what says, our laboratory and others
previously demonstrated that mrna lipid nano particle you
know, the part that Bak told you was
super dangerous.
Vaccines coding influenza virus
Induce potent immune responses.
Same game as always.
Well, is it the right immune response?
Well, you got... They got the response they
wanted? Does that mean it's gonna protect you
against the thing that's out there? If that's
even really there? Well, no. That's not the
same thing. But just like Fauci said, we
got... We saw it we saw a,
antibody response.
As long as see a large antibody fonts,
we can d that that will have the
effect. Well guess what? They've do wrong or
lied to you about every other 1 throughout
the Covid illusion.
But it says we recently developed a multi,
A multi vale mrna lipid nano particle vaccine
that encodes an
a protein,
from every influenza very virus subtype,
including played 1H5.
So start talking about the bird flu overlap
and just every possible
influenza virus subtype.
Does that sound safe?
The multi
vaccine protects experimentally
infected animals against severe disease and death.
So we're still playing that game too? Is
it about stopping you from getting sick. Oh,
no. No. That's old stuff. We only we
only
protect you from severe disease and death. So
when you get really sick, we just go...
We didn't die.
Is that what we're supposed to be protecting
ourselves from? And that means that you can
still catch it, spread it on. It's the
same thing during go. We're just shifting the
goal... The goal post at this point?
So now the only thing you get vaccinated
for is to maybe not die. Is that
the game we're playing? I mean, that's how
they keep framing all this stuff. But first
is the multi.
They have 1. It's not the 1 that
we're talking about necessarily, but they're highlighting first,
that they have a multi 1, that protects
against all of them. How long until they
just
insert that as the necessity because the first
one's not working if this happens. But it
says, however,
The vaccine is not expected to elicit neutralizing
antibodies and s immunity against
mismatched influenza virus strains, such as
Clad 2344B5
vaccine viruses, which by the way, is the
1 they're telling you was happening.
So why did we even talk about oops?
Why did they even talk about this?
To to basically highlight the fact? Though, Don't
worry though We created a mo a mono
n modified mrna lipid nano particle vaccine encoding
specifically this 1.
So all they're saying appears is we make
this multi 1 that includes all the different
things, but, you know, it might not work.
Okay? So we made this extra 1 that
has just 1 in it. I just think
that's strange.
What and
overall for something that's clearly not even happening
right now in a sense that they're, like,
if they want to... If it... This was
something that was necessary,
You wouldn't see the hype around Let's just
put it this way to make it as
simple as possible.
You're seeing it spread from whatever they claim
anyway. Question that. Birds to cows to occasional
people. They claim, which far all we know
is a Pcr false positive or just some
of the random flu or nothing at all.
And then nothing happens.
They're around people. They're going to about there.
They're not spreading this to other people. I
don't believe this went from cows to chickens
people with nothing else happening. I think that's
a ridiculous claim.
Certainly possible, I guess. But then my point
is they're rushing through all these multi nonviolent
for specifics for some it's not actually a
problem right now.
That seems alarming to me. They don't just
spend money for no reason if they aren't
gonna use it. Like, we talked about Finland,
already saying they're gonna start to give it
out to people, specific grouping around the most
concerning.
And we talked about the risks that are
associated with the shot they're pointing to. Which
are a hell of a lot higher than
the thing that you might be dealing with
here. According to their own statistics.
But it says we've vaccinated fe using a
prime boost strategy.
To mimic the dosing schedule initially used for
Carbon 19.
Stars 2, Mrna vaccination of humans You know
what that means? We don't just give you
1 shot. We don't even make it to
be 1 shot. We give you 1, and
then we boost you later.
That's the right to do. Just... They modeled
it after Covid 19 did that work. I
mean, it
spectacularly failed even according to Fauci.
So we just do it again. Does that
seem like an appropriate step.
It's kind of boggling. They mind blowing, but
they just
don't care that we see this that most
everybody was at least
at the end of that kind of concerned
about what the new shot. I mean, they
stopped taking them.
And they just go in the exact same
direction, the same side modified. Down mrna a
lipid nano particle shot with boosting primed and
boosting. And I mean, it's it's laughable.
It will also be important they say to
evaluate the K234B4BH5,
mrna lipid banana particle vaccine in birds and
other animals that could potentially serve as an
intermediate host to humans such as swine.
Of course.
The pig aspect cow It's just all over,
we're gonna just jam this stuff full. Every
animal possible.
Seems like a really dangerous and stupid thing
to do. Our studies highlight flexibility say of
the mrna vaccine platform,
which is the whole point, which allows for
rapid development to precise anti antigen matching of
vaccine I to emerging influenza virus strains with
pandemic potential or not at all as the
entire Covid illusion proved, they failed and failed
and failed and failed and lied and failed
lied and then covered it up and lied
and then failed over and over and over.
Is anybody confused about that? The reality of
how clearly they would push the new... It's...
We have to Aim towards the Ba 2
5, what were we showing you?
At that time, if this is whether... Even
if you believe those don't exist, the point
was they were pointing to The Ba 2
5 or whatever it was the time, and
we would look at their data and go
well according to them, this is now diminishing
and do things rising, and they just brush
the thing out 2 months after that and
say this is the next 1 and we're
already 4 things down the line according to
their own narrative.
It's just like it's like they can't even
coordinate all lies they can't even coordinate their
lives what they're actually doing.
Way, that showed you that this kind of
direction is a failure
Fauci wrote about that.
It says the project has been funded in
part.
With federal funds from the Nih,
Nih,
Hhs.
The same old guys. So say get the
old back together. Let's go right back at
and do it again. Right? The same people.
That concerns me. Now just like we said,
we we highlighted this 1 on yesterday show.
The pandemics of fear. Right? That caused the
precautionary stocking of largely useless antiviral and a
rational vaccine policies.
The idea that this is because of the
industry and the hype and the lies from
the media That's what the Who is talking
about right here. Well, I said I would
talk about the other 1. Here's the other
1. This is from health and human services.
Saying,
influenza deaths request for correction. Rather if somebody...
Is to somebody engaging with them. It's 1
of the doctors, writing to health and human
services. It says.
And this is from 2000...
I believe this was 2017.
It says the Us dad on influenza deaths
are false and misleading.
The Cdc
acknowledges a difference between flu and flu associated
death yet uses them interchangeably, just like we're
seeing with Covid and anything going forward? It
says why are flu and pneumonia bundle together?
Lie, essentially. And here there's a lot in
here should read, but the point is, meanwhile,
according to Cdc's
national Center for Health statistics,
Influenza and pneumonia bind, like
Pi,
pneumonia influenza and Covid, which is the same,
lie, the same manipulation,
They claim pneumonia influenza together took 62000
lives in 2001,
except 61777
of them were attributed to pneumonia and 257
to the flu. And after that, only 08:18
of those 257
were actually positively
identified.
That is a very real stat, and that's
what we're dealing with today.
It's blindly lump it all in whatever direction
works for them. And it says the Cdc
uses
indirect modeling methods to estimate the number of
deaths.
So in other words, they lie to you
or they guess the best they can, but
we've already seen how many times they've guessed
in the wrong direction that happened to align
with the interest of the government.
It says thus, the much publicized figure of
36000,
which is the claim appear that they say
that how many die from the flu every
year.
Is not an estimate of yearly flu deaths
as widely reported in both the lay and
scientific press, but an estimate
generated by a model
of flu associated
death, isn't that a little bit different, a
lot bit different?
And 1 of their experts expert says on
the record based on modeling, we think it's
associated.
He says I don't know that we would
say that it's the underlying cause of death,
except that's what the Cdc says.
And these... And they write yet the stance
is incompatible with the Cdc assertion of the
flu killed 36000
people a year. It's a guess based on
a model.
And it says a mis miscommunication that is
yet to be publicly
corrected.
And here's the most important part.
At the 2004
National influenza vaccine Summit, c sponsored by the
Cdc and the American Medical Association,
Glenn No, associate director for the communications at
the Nip spoke on using the media to
boost demand for the vaccine. 1 step of
a 7 step recipe for generating interest in
and demand for flu vaccination or any other.
That's the title.
Occurs when, quote, medical experts and public health
authorities publicly,
state concern and alarm
and predict dire outcomes what it's written right
there and urge influenza vaccination. So in other
words, when they hype the fear around something
that's not there.
Another step entails quote, continued reports. That influenza
is causing severe illness and or affecting lots
of people, helping foster the perception of their
words that many people are susceptible to a
bad case of influenza.
Despite the fact that only 257 people, they
claim died from it and yet only 18
of those Rem tested.
It says preceding the summit, demand had been
low early in the 2003
flu season.
It says, quote, at that point, the manufacturers
were telling us that they weren't receiving a
lot of orders for vaccines
for use in November or December.
Recall doctor No on public an Npr.
So he says, quote, it really did look
like we needed to do something to encourage
people to get a flu shot.
So it says by arbitrarily linking fluid pneumonia,
which is where that comes from. Current data
are statistically biased.
Right So we are at an point where
they we needed to hype up the fear,
so they jam those together and say look
at how bad it is,
and they lied to you. It says until
corrected and until on unbiased statistics are developed.
The chances for sound discussion and public health
policy are limited.
And here we are today, never changed. In
fact, it got worse. They can mine other
things too. They lie to you Pcr false
positives, that's the game. They're in the business
of lying to you to sell vaccines if
not far far darker things around that.
Now, we're gonna get into a conversation about
Israel, but I wanted to give you a
couple of updates.
Just 1 thing we covered yesterday that I
hyped... I highlighted in the beginning of the
show today that I wanted to make sure
it has been followed up on.
This was the article we showed you from
yesterday.
And this is in regard to a a
channel 13 from israel saying, Israel was put
on a blacklist of the Un.
Be of, of countries that kill children.
Now we reported yesterday, the point was that
this was
on, you know, basically, because Israeli media saying
it, It's very well could be a hype
nonsensical why for their own agendas from coming
from these Israeli government that has immediate control
over the media.
We just saw them literally
actually censor with black bars, an article Hr
put out. The of the leading platforms there.
So you realize israel sensors have a direct
effect. There's no freedom impress there. That's the
reality. If they can do that, there is
no freedom press. So they're lying like everything
else. But The point is I was worried
that this might have been something like that.
So even though they're pouring it even though
they're showing the breakdown of them saying, and
I was still just cautionary, maybe it's a
lie. But here we are today, and it
seems it seems to have continued to report.
Un decides to put Israel on a blacklist
for harming children and conflict zones, and it
goes on to just highlight what they were
saying. And they're citing.
Now
that they're saying,
Antonio Gut gutierrez the Un has informed the
Israeli armies that Ata attach in Washington,
major general he that the decision was to
black... Put them on the blacklist list. 4
killing children.
Israel's inclusion of the blacklist is very problematic
and may cause countries in the world to
impose an arms embargo in israel. Well what
we can only hope.
I'll include that as well, and then here
is times of israel from today.
Un ads israel to a list of shame
for alleged rights violations against children. This is
from times Israel. So it's pretty clear this
happening.
I think it's absolutely correct. It's the right
thing to be that I think this should
be happening.
And on top of that apparently, the... I
haven't seen it yet on the Un website,
and we've been looking in general, and but
this is just 1 of the things that
was published from before, that shows you that
this is not new. It goes back as
far as you wanna look from human rights
group from the Un, israel's real suppression of
Palestinian rights and organizations illegal and unacceptable,
just they've have been highlighting the crimes israel
for a very long time.
So let's talk about Russia Ukraine before we
get back into the conversation of Israel. I
wanna to just start with that, so we
saw that important point that it has been
in many ways verified even by times Israel.
I think it's important to consider this overlap.
Now this is about the Us government,
continuing to fund what is clearly the most...
Well, I mean, I shouldn't say that anymore.
But I was gonna say is the most
clear the most obvious embodiment of a, you
know, nazi fascist element in the world, but
I think is real seemingly taking that
in stride, like, just showing you no problem.
That's what... Like, I think the point is
that we can prove the history there, which
sense I bring it up I'll include our
work around that that we overlap the undeniable
connection to the historical I don't mean Neo
nazis. I mean, the actual nazi party and
the the
organization no... The Zion organization trying to align
themselves with Nazi Germany during and after the
final solution, which is a verifiable fact. You
look it up Wikipedia, and yet, we grapple
with the idea that somehow we're fighting that,
and they built Israel to defend against the
thing they were helping, and, you know, at
least aligned with. It's it's ridiculous.
But we covered this, Zion is inverse nazis.
My point though is that we see the
As movement, the other very
shockingly obvious neo nazi and actual nazi elements
in Ukraine that both Israel and the United
States continue to fund against Russia.
Whatever your thoughts against Russia, the point is
that these people are actively continuing to support
the worst people out there.
As important to realize. Now this is coming
from
yesterday.
Us to send 225000000
dollar military aid package to Ukraine.
Americans don't want this.
It's across the board, you can see this,
guys, the vast majority of Americans do not
want to spend more money on forever wars.
Whoever their support. It's just not in the
car, but their government, whether there's Trump or
Biden or Our, they seem to be all
about it.
Despite what... I mean, I guess you could
hope the anomaly would be Junior that is
just saying certain things to get a power
and he's gonna change and become the anti
work candidate again, but I don't see that
happening. He'd to be blind supporting israel like
the rest of them.
But on the note of Ukraine and Edinburgh,
it's important to highlight
some of these overlaps
Here's what Doug Douglas Mac mcgregor highlights, which
is concerning as hell as they're giving more
funding. And as this only seems to be
kind of building towards something much worse
possibly my concern is using this in a
large event kind of way to distract from
what's going on in Gaza.
But he says Nato is now planning to
get Us troops to the front to fight
Russia, which if you want my honest opinion?
It's already happening. Has been they've been on
the ground, just like in Gaza, which we've
proven
10 times over.
So whether this is just more deployment. I
think we need to acknowledge that's already been
going on. We've seen Us personnel on the
ground with Ukraine many times. But now they're
publicly saying this, and it's not just the
Us but nato.
So nato countries, which isn't that would I...
We argue, it would be at least a
public big step
because realize we've seen all sorts of overlap
in Ukraine as well. Other countries. When he
goes, what are they thinking? Nato has disclosed
its preparations to deploy American troops to the
European front frontlines in the event of a
full scale conflict with the Russia. How is
that not already what's happening?
Well says innovative land corridors are being established
to expedite the movement of soldiers, like they're
driving this guys,
and the point continues to be made. The
Us government
must be aware that they are goose stepping
into destruction.
They cannot possibly take all this on at
once. And no matter what the hype about
the, you know, pretty much the right side
of the conversation wants to argue that no
1 can the you. It's just not true.
Very clearly. If Israel takes us to the
point where it least in the middle east,
causing a multi front regional war,
they will not be able to fight this
off. It's very clear. No matter what the
arguments you're hearing from people in the partisan
media, It's obvious and the Us government and
military and experts that are being honest about
it have openly said that.
So why do they keep pushing it? Why
do they keep funding is real? Why do
they keep poking booting in the eye and
driving this even further?
I don't know.
I frankly think it's baffling, watching a situation
where you know that they know that,
and yet they keep pushing it maybe in
hopes. I mean, maybe they're calling the ultimate
bluff to say that they You know, what's
even what's funny when you think about it
that they're playing the role of what they
always say Russia is, the bell, you know,
warm mon. That's what they always say The
soviet union which not what they are today.
While banking on the fact that Russia will
show restraints
is what I think is happening, which is
interesting when you think about the narratives. Right?
But in any case, they're still pushing this
forward,
reports suggest that these plans also encompass provisions
for potential attacks in Russia.
Very worried about the way this goes forward.
Daniel Mca adams. So while they're pushing to
have at least publicly
Us troops or the frontline fighting Russia?
There's a Ukrainian list We've talked about many
times that because many Americans on that list.
And they're okay with that. And even worse
as Daniel Look at points out, he's now
made that list.
It says the organization's making its hate list
of American citizens, guess what? It's funded by
Aid.
That's just where we are. Your own government
funding list that put Americans on kill list
or funding people in the is Israel that
are actively killing both American hostages and American
gaza for a residents.
Still happens they're happening right now. They're bombing
places where they're probably killing right now. But
who cares because, you know, we support our
be the worst people in the planet. But
it says shocking to read my... That my
tax dollars, he says go toward putting me
on a list of foreign countries known to
assassinate journalists.
And and make sure... Oh, I should know
I can retrieve that. Make sure he follow.
He says he's gonna do a write up
on this. Daniel Mca adams from the,
Ron Ron Paul.
Or is that my what it was? The
Ron Paul's show. But, you know, if you
haven't followed, no, director of Ron Paul Institute,
this actual title. Daniel Mca you should be
following. I just think that's kinda crazy. And
I think that most Americans
who are honest with themselves are coming to
terms with a lot of these really uncomfortable
realities.
Are an knob trend. Right? So the... Those
numbers in regard to this survey,
which again, I'm... I always take surveys or
poles with a grain of salt.
But it's been pretty consistent with this regard.
The numbers are absolutely unbelievable and show
how much at odds western so called democratic
leaders are with their own
populations. And again, when it comes to Ukraine,
but also Israel.
It says it's a survey compiled by the
Institute for Global Affairs, part of your Eurasia
Group,
1 of the leading American political risk consult,
meaning that they
I mean, if they're... If that's how bad
it looks it's probably way worse than that.
An incredible, 94
percent.
According to this poll of a america and
88 percent of Western Europeans believe, quote,
that nato member countries should push for a
negotiated settlement with the war Ukraine.
And only a tiny minority.
In both countries, less than 20 percent, believe
that the West should prioritize goals like weakening
Russia. Are restoring the pre 20 22 borders
of Ukraine. Instead, vastly favoring goals like avoiding
escalation, avoiding direct war between nuclear power. Yeah.
Exactly what we're telling you. Whether it's Nuance
not Americans don't want to support what they're
doing with your money while giving it to
the worst people in the world.
He says I always had the distinct feeling
that most of the populations in the west
were opposed to their government policies in Ukraine,
but he never expected such overwhelming numbers. It
says so much about western quote democracy today
and also about the media class, which tells
us continuously how important fighting Russia is.
Not only do they not represent the voice
of the people, but they really don't convince
them either.
So if they don't represent the voice of
the people,
whose voice do they represent?
The government,
special interests.
The exact opposite of what journalism is supposed
to be,
Not new information. You all know this. Another
interesting and very related insight is that when
asked which of the following are the biggest
challenges your country faces today.
By far, the most popular answer is, quote,
political elites making decisions that hurt the public.
Look at.
Here's the link You can look at it
for yourself.
This is my larger point right now, but
it's not just 1 topic or the other.
They are rapidly
hem support from their own people and that
terri them. That's the 1 thing that they're
always so desperate to maintain with the 2
party illusion divide and Conquer, keeping us in
odds to each other. Wedge issues and elections
and so on. And right now, people are
increasingly aware of how completely wholesale dishonest as
they are.
We should have always been like that. And
that's not to say that it's the country.
It is the government. We have been manipulated,
whether it's going back to the overlap of
you know, organized crime and that whole overlap
of whitney highlights or whether it's something from
newer today or Zion influence or all of
them combined. We're watching
the reality of what that government has become.
If it was ever, what we thought. To
the point is Americans can change that. I
believe that.
That's why they're so desperate to frame themselves
as the good guy because they know that's
what we want.
And, Thomas Fo just highlights the same study
saying an overwhelming majority of Western citizens, don't
support their proxy war, and even less so
it falls all out war with Russia. So
what are the elites doing?
Escalating the military support for Ukraine and pushing
for World war 3? The name of democracy
of course.
Sounds smart.
Well, here's what you're getting from these... You
know, people are trying to frame this and
really try to justify
the ongoing illegal actions from the Us government
and everybody else involved.
They say, hell highlight this. President
Putin threatens to use nuclear weapons.
Or not at all. In fact, If you
actually even read what they highlighted here, and
you can what you can watch it's in
another 4 language, but this is very clearly
what he's can annually done.
He says the West believes that Russia will
never use it.
We have a nuclear doctrine, and that's actually
funny enough my exact point.
While pretending that they're the bell monster, they're
they're banking on the fact that they have
restraint. It just it's hilariously inverted. It shows
you that they are who they're pretending Russia
is. And it says, then that's not good
guy bad guy. She's simply about the facts.
As the west believes that Russia will never
use it, he says. But he goes on
to say we have a nuclear doctrine.
Look what is written there.
If someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and our
territorial integrity, we consider
it possible to use all the means at
our disposal. That is so shockingly far from
rot putin and Says use them.
Of course, if it's this he's pointing to
the doctrine? Should we... Should we be pushed
to a position where we are in facing
our annihilation, will
it says we'll consider using all of our
possibilities.
You know, israel and the rest of them,
even though they hide that reality, they will
say,
we'll do any... Like, the Us government repeatedly,
but bolt Pompeo, Trump.
Well, wipe you off. Like you've never seen
before We'll wipe you off the map. Well,
bomb, we'll take action. You've never seen we'll
do, you know, that kind of stuff, which
very clearly means something that is bigger than
what they're already doing.
Because they are the living embodiment of what
they say these people are. The
might is right stomp around only know 1
thing.
Everything... If you have a... If you're if
you're in... What's what's the analogy.
If you're a hammer or everything looks like
a nail. Right? That's the idea It just...
They just... They know 1 thing, violence.
Blunt force. And if they're losing their own
support because of it.
But here is what the France 24, the
guy interviewing said about this. Which I think
is just so lacking of awareness.
The idea that these... First of all, that
journal is just supposed to pick a side,
which is the exact opposite. Now, you could
have your own personal opinions, the idea is
supposed to declare aside and we've got a
moral battle.
Journalists are supposed to be objective to a
fault in everything they cover, whether or not
you think that's the reality. And objectivity is
not counter to taking the moral side.
In fact, the objectivity is what actually helps
you find that moral side. Oh, look at
that.
Instagram sensor our show again. Like, Point that
out every time it happens now. But
here's what he says about this. And now
Contrast that with what the As movement is
currently doing. As he highlights what moral side
you're supposed to be on. As I get
he's backing Israel.
Oh, it looks like I didn't grab that.
That's frustrating. Hold on. I don't know how
I do that.
As I grabbed this.
The odds off movement as we've covered from
the start.
Are doing some of the most...
It should... You know, if the
deliberately violent, deliberately
what's the right word?
Designed to be little and d.
Right? Tying in a lamp post, jamming things
up their private parts I mean, that's what
they were doing. It's all public, guys. And
of course, you got nothing but the screams
from people online acting like that was all
fake news, and now we... It's easily proven.
Here is
this clip.
And France 24,
pretending, like, the moral side to back to
people doing those things.
A way caught up in an information war
where we can be very easily
manipulated, I think, and we have to be
aware of that, and we also have to
be aware of the need to be objective.
Right. He... So you'd think he's going in
the right direction, except he he ends up
going. We should be on the side of
Ukraine.
Well, there been... They have been caught, which
I'm sure is aware of despite acting like
he's the objective journalist,
lying more than I've ever seen now safe
Israel.
Just 1 after another about rape about the
ghosts kiev about things they were shooting down,
Just 1 after another. Just quick succession in
the first couple of weeks. Getting caught everywhere,
and it just continued ever all the way
forward. Bo, K dot train station. They got
caught in every 1 of these things lying
about it. The missile the the rocket that
apparently flew and hit the other country that
they lied... Z never stopped lying about that
despite the entire world saying, no, no. That
was your missile.
They're just liars. That's what they do. But
not necessarily neutral. That was what a lot...
You know, there's been a lot of discussion
about, what does it mean to be aware
of the need to be objective
but not necessarily neutral. That was what a
lot... You know, there's been a lot of
discussion about what does it mean to be
neutral, and I think the conclusion in terms
of, France 24
guiding principles is that we have to be
objective,
but we're in a situation where this war
that Russia is waging against Ukraine. Fundamentally is
undeveloped. You can debate about the geopolitical little
little background and the reasons why it's happened,
but you can't... In my view, you know,
in any way, say that it's justified
And when you look at some of the
crimes that have been committed... I mean, guys,
how could you possibly be a journalist and
not consider? Like, what he's doing is just
blindly accepting the narrative spun around the Don
bass about Crimea
about the fact that they're openly nazi elements
that have been called nazi elements by probably
him his own paper before suddenly going, wait
what do you mean Do you mean Nazis?
They're all not there anymore. It's all a
big lie.
Like, how do you possibly not see that?
So if this person is either dishonest or
really that completely enacted this job.
I think these are objective realities, but of
course, I could be wrong. Did by Russian
soldiers in Ukraine, the massacres and B, I
mean, I visited also the d occupied areas
of har region, in particular that... Remember,
I've proven to you based on that video.
Many other examples that they were the ones
that killed them based on the satellites they
lied about where they were. The fact that
they pulled those bodies into place in order
to pile and then point it out and
said so look what Russia did. Even though
you have them on video pulling bodies into
exact position where they ended up.
But apparently, he can't su that 1 out.
Stories people tell there about being tortured by
the Russian. You can't be neutral in those
kinds of circumstances, but you have to also
you know, make sure that we being clear
to our audiences work... Of course, you can
be neutral. Like, the idea he's trying to
pretend that you suddenly don't be you're no
longer neutral when you feel so something is
wrong, then you shouldn't be a journalist.
To... Because the point there becomes that you've
decided that's wrong. So you're already on a
side. So you're no longer objective.
That's Western media for you right there. It's
not about saying that you accept the wrong
thing. You just our objective. You don't apply
fault. You look at the facts and you
report the facts.
It's amazing I have to explain this to
mainstream journalism.
By we're not neutral. Why we think that
this is
something that we, in a way have to
take sides
on,
How embarrassing.
Now by the way, here's that butcher clip.
That I played many times in the opening
of it. Just a quick clip montage, but
it shows you the same points.
Body.
They were trying to d deb bomb the
bodies or... Look for bombs in the about.
Really. So you're gonna stand 10 feet away
from a body and drag it around, like,
peep... Military people laughed at that.
If they got caught. They were literally really
dragging these bodies into place
and then left them there and then went
and look what Russia did.
They caught. They were caught red handed, like
everything else.
But he doesn't know that or it doesn't
care.
So here is an example of what they're
currently doing. And this has been circulating round.
I thought a Freddie, talk about this as
well.
Ukrainian soldiers put out in their own video,
executing African mercenaries
for quote desert dessert.
And realize it's same with Israel same with
Ukraine they're using their moderate rebels, and they're
shuttle shuffling az off movement back and forth,
but they're also just paying people to fight.
It's not about having
you know, Israelis are parts of the world
coming to fight because they believe in the
cause. They're literally paying thousands of dollars from
mercenaries in Israel and in Ukraine to fight.
Is that what this... That what you usually
hear from the good guys well. The funny
thing is is even Us government often and
usually Yours with mercenary groups or like academy?
Black water.
Same deal. I've argue there's an obvious point
there. But either way, the point is this
is what the oz movement is doing, and
this is what they're pretending is the moral
side.
As they say, your black ass should have
stayed Africa.
Right. You know why? Because these people are
openly,
vividly racist.
Literally, their statement is we will spread the
white race around the world once we're done
with Russia, but we pretend La la. That's
not real. We don't wanna hear it. You
know, because they're the bad guy.
They're they they anyone will listen to them.
They're saying, we... That's what we're gonna do.
You know, we... They're... They have conferences in
at the beginning of this saying, we don't
even... The Us media is lying about us.
We do believe in this. We are Nazis.
Open.
Of course, you could cnn accidentally catching them
giving nazi salute and having Isis patches, you
know, but we just pretend it's not all
there, how embarrassing.
Here's here's this clip. You can just see
it right here.
It says we have no mercy for.
And they shoot them down.
I mean, it's it's not unique. Oz off
movement putting member at the beginning, they put
out a a... See if I can even
grab that It's been a while.
Yeah. Look at that.
This is from the Oz movement. Here's the
actual link Oh. That's right I forgot the
Twitter deleted it.
See if I grab it this way.
Of course. Of course, they deleted because they're
covering up just like everything else. Even though
this wasn't a violation of anything, not really.
They're allowing pictures of dead bodies everywhere.
But this was an image of an oz
movement member dipping their bolts in pig fat
Oh, come on. I prayed that up last
time. See the way back machine, the rest
of these are compromised in my opinion too.
But here's the article.
That had the video, and... I've got the
video somewhere. I just don't have it pulled
up right now. But these were
oz movement fighters.
They were dipping their bullets in pig fat
and because they were about to fight Muslims.
That's the kind of people they are,
because they should, you know it's about
violating their religion while you kill them ind
independently, You know, because that's just what good
people do.
And it says, Oz fighters as the National
guard grease the bulls with Lard against the
Orcs.
You just another 1 of their derogatory terms.
So as they
assassinate these people, and they're willing to use
them, throw them a bill within they wanna
stop fighting for you. We'll kill them.
Even though they're mercenaries
make a lot of sense that to these
people are.
And don't forget israel
has openly been funding the As of movement
specifically
For a long time, this is 2018.
Rights groups in Israel, we're asking why are
you arming neo Nazis, and it's specifically the
Oz off movement if you haven't already seen
this. Which is right here.
Or where was it. Right there. Oz, Militia.
So if you're confused about the zion is
movement aligning self with Nazi Germany,
then you should also probably be confused about
why they're funding neo Nazis and Ukraine.
But once you understand that that's what they've
always been doing, It's not hard to see.
And here is another horrifying example of Ukraine
launching an... In incomprehensible attack against civilians specifically
in lug guns in the
area in this just the Don bass overlap.
So they've been doing long before Russia began
this. And again, just the actual war with
ram... But it says at least 35 people
killed.
This is the reality of what they're continuing
to do.
And here's an example of Az movement members
from Ukraine,
fighting with Israel in Gaza, Which is not
a new topic. Of just showing you the
overlap, guys, and that's not a new. We've
already covered this going back to 20 23.
Where you right to the board, mom. I'm
in Israel. How's that movement? Yay.
Right? I mean, this this is an undeniable
thing, guys.
Here is
israel's use of thousands of foreign mercenaries and
there are attacks on Gaza. You could read
this for yourself.
Thousands of dollars being spent on mercenaries.
There's... I mean, you could read into that
however you want because they can't fight it
themselves, because they don't have people to want
to. Because their only military isn't even a
real military. They're been spending decades, shooting women
and children and That's seemingly proving that right
now with the fact that they can't even...
I mean, just everything.
Everything about this.
Now let's talk about the Ceasefire overlap,
showing you what we're really dealing with what
these governments truly are, who they're supporting at
your expense, pretending they're doing it for you.
They're pretending this whole cease ceasefire engagement is
confusing.
When it's 1 of the most obvious things
in all of this. That israel is
desperately
maintaining this, you could argue Just net netanyahu,
but I don't think that's the case. I
think that's the framing to make it look
like it's only 1 person, But I I
do know Netanyahu is explicitly invested in doing
this to maintain his own, you know, not
going to jail, but It's bigger than just
him. The point is that they've... They offered
this and it's been accepted more than once
and more than once they've pretended it didn't
happen.
Robert wrote about this in May, Hamas agrees
a Ceasefire israel tax roth response. The 1
we just covered recently, israel once again refuses
their own Ceasefire deal after, Hell accepts.
So you can read those for yourself. I'm
not gonna go to all the details is
that we've talked about it a lot. Oh,
excuse me. This was my show about it.
Hold on.
I wanted to grab the article.
I meant to grab the article, not my
show on it.
Oh, well.
Ballots in there. It's in there somewhere. I
don't want time to waste to search for
it. But the point is
Robert covered this as well, and they are
absolutely doing the same exact thing. Now to
talk about this, we've briefly brushed over this
yesterday, but this is from the sixth, it's
simply saying Hamas claims disparity between Israeli and
Us cease fire proposals.
Now we're hearing that there might... This... There
might actually be a level of them going,
you know, here's the thing we wanna show
you, and here's the thing we're pretending we're
agreeing to. So that could be a Biden
thing or Us thing or it could be
an Israeli plan to guarantee this will break
down if they really want to by going,
we're not even on the same page at
the end of the day.
When understand, this is the point you cannot
ignore Israel accepted this. They gave it through
the Us mediator and their own
And then everybody said Israel is okay. They
better take it. Hamas is the only 1.
I mean, across the board on Twitter.
And then Hamas, and this is the secret
events said, we accept.
And then israel real spun out and was
like, wait. Lies. That's not true. That's the
wrong thing. We don't agree. You already did.
So even if that is true,
it's too late. You already said yes, but
now they just reel it back and embarrass
themselves, but they don't care.
So here's what suppress news highlights. This is
a statement from 1 of the Hamas leaders
I kind was saying earlier. Ham his name
is
Osama Ham.
Not the 3 being comfortably set up in
cutter.
He says the Cease ceasefire agreement that Gaza
have proposed by the Us president
are merely words, and the movement has not
received any written comp...
Commitments.
So that's very interesting to me. And I
guess the point would be that first, this
becomes a statement saying, here's what Israel's offering.
Do you accept They say yes. And then
that becomes some kind of a written agreement.
I would imagine.
So the point is I think that kinda
makes sense because now at a point where
Israel's already pulled back and so there's nothing
to be signed. Anyway, the point is that
they don't have anything in front of them
to say, here's the outline.
It says Hamas is ready to accept any
agreement that meets the movements basic demands, which
has never changed since the first week, which
include a cease ceasefire
and it can play withdraw of their forces.
Which by the way, are the only things
israel real won't agree to,
which means they only care about that and
not their own people.
Because realistically, they could say, okay, we'll pull
out Cease ceasefire, everybody comes home.
And then 30 seconds after that, make go
right back to bombing them, and you well
know that. They've they haven't honored any of
these agreements going back as far as you
can look.
So why don't they do that? Because 1,
I'm convinced that they don't want these people
to come back for multiple reasons because of
what they know from October seventh, what they
know about what's happening now on and on
and on.
On top of that, they care more about
going after all of Palestine for Zion interest
and they do about the Israelis that are
there.
Simple. It's very simple.
Now here is Middle East I highlighting the
full text of Israel's Gaza Cease ceasefire pool
that at this point, just probably 45 times
different because of how many times they've already
muddled this up but at the time when
they offered and it was accepted, this was
the breakdown. And this was this was published
on yesterday on the sixth. Now it says,
the for the first part of this, under
the first stage, there's 3 or 4 stages,
I think. It says the temporary
succession. And here's what I think is interesting.
Biden put out some little image that I
don't... It doesn't seem to correspond with anything
in reality that says permanent and lasting 5...
Ceasefire.
That's clearly not the case.
Temporary succession of operations, step 1,
temporary succession of aerial movement. That's step 2.
Temporary seems very clear, but you could argue
that they goes on to make art state
how they would then progress to a longer
lasting 1. Right? But this is 1 Or
highlighted in general. If you read all these,
and you can go through each 1. I
think it's kind of... Until something's actually truly
happening. It's kind of a thing like waste
of time. So But it says all procedures
in this stage
above this, including the temporary
session of military operations by both sides, aid
and shelter effort
withdrawal forces, etcetera, will continue into stage 2
so long as the negotiations on the conditions
for implementing stage 2 of the agreement are
ongoing.
That seems wildly ambiguous, and it simply says,
this is temporary first place. And then we
have to segue into the stage 2, which
apparently there's an opening there for them to
go, no. No. This nap which is what's
going to happen.
And says the guarantee the gu of this
agreement shall make every effort to ensure that
those indirect negotiations continue until both sides are
able to reach agreement on the conditions for
implementing stage 2, which I guarantee that's where
that will break down by design.
So overall,
it seems to be designed to not lead
to the end get at which I the
whole point. They don't want this.
All they would have to do is set
out the basic agreements that they both have,
and I mean, the if if Israel actually
means what they keep saying, then this would
already be done.
Because both of them are basically saying the
same things other than the ongoing effort to
destroy him hamas,
which again,
it's not boxed out of this conversation once
this thing goes... Once this is settled. You
think they can't just violate the piece of
paper they wrote down by saying by the
way is what's happened every time. A rocket
just flew, so they broke it. It's on
them. We're gonna kill everybody again.
It's very simple.
Now Dave Saying, highlighting the reality of this.
Highlights,
Ru
dis saying, Russia, China w with Us over
Un resolution on Gaza fire plan. The Us
is dead in the the Un is dead
in the waters. It says the United States
the United security council has become a proxy
battlefield on the major powers and serves no
1, which I don't know if I initially
agree with. I don't believe
any of... I thought most of these people
in there are are actively in specifically the
Security council, actively fighting for their own interests.
But I don't think it's as simple as
1 thing or the other. I... This that
that would be like talking about the Had
body, like, the actual people in the Un
not the security council a different in... Because
each 1 of these are different countries with
their own interests.
So I I think it's dangerous to broad
strokes something like that, especially as we've seen
many different anomalies like Bosnia, or excuse me,
Bolivia and plenty of other examples where they
challenged them right in and that's right in
that chamber.
But it says the west must d from
this useless or I agree with. I don't...
But I... I think the Un poses a
very concerning risk for sovereignty in a lot
of different ways.
But that does not mean we should not
acknowledge and understand and align ourselves with the
under the
agreed upon
international law dynamic.
Which doesn't mean they can then use that
to invade that's not the point, But it's
about acknowledging that there is an agreement of
what we say is crossing a line and
that we can all as a collective say,
that group just broke that rule.
Doesn't mean that they're being dragged off the
jail, but it may... It sets a standard
that can then be enforced by other entities,
however they see fit. And that's not to
say that there's a pot... Like, I guarantee
you somebody can come up with a better
solution. But at the moment, what we have
the people they're acting like International ball is
everything that matters are the ones that actively
using that against everybody. And in fact, violating
it everywhere they turn. So there has to
be some kind of an, you know,
framework.
The problem is that right now they seem
to be driving in the direction of
bucking the entire thing, ignoring that the only
ones actually violating are the ones pretending like
their corrupt, even though we know ultimately in
a lot of clear ways that they are,
but my point is if they have a
multifaceted body of individual countries and individual people,
They let's just even say they're all corrupt.
The point is that their own... Their corruption
will not align. They will all be acting
in their own interest. There is a level
of accountability that happens within something like that.
Even then I still don't argue they're all
corrupt.
But here is what Sam hussein said, it's
not a c fire proposal. It's a stop
the Ic orders from being implemented resolution. Hundred
percent.
This is what the Us government means when
it says it wants a rules based order
and not a law based order.
It sets the rules, it shreds the law
when it wants.
Exactly.
Now he also highlights what, Francis Boyle said.
We're first highlighting this from Ram Arya,
Aya,
The you... This is the
United States Mission to the Un circulated a
draft Cease ceasefire resolution, and this is posted
on the third.
That welcomes the new deal announced the 30
first and calls upon hamas accept it, And
we already went over this. How could you
have something like that posted and then pretend
that Israel
didn't accept.
And you put all these statements out. And
everybody tweets about it. We go, home almost
better take it, and they say, yes, and
then you act like it's not the case.
How embarrassing for everybody? Like, this is really
weak.
Buddy he highlights, Francis, boyle, professor Francis boyle,
on the draft you un resolution. He says
this is a joke. It calls upon Hamas
to adhere to a cease ceasefire, but not
as real.
Which is the Un member state. So in
other words, Tomas moss is bound, but israel's
role is not bound.
That makes sense? It shouldn't is ridiculous.
This is the broken nature of what we're
talking about. But on top of that, this
is a great point that's made in 1
of these clips we're gonna show.
And this is something that keep people keep
arguing that the very agreement itself finalize with
the destruction of Hamas. That's what Israel keeps
pushing.
So in what world would Hamas agree to
an agree something that would
end with their annihilation.
And then home Matt goes well because they
they claim they're fighting for the interest of
Palestinians.
Okay. But you keep telling us that's not
true. So you can't point to that as
the explanation if you tell us, that's a
lie, so that doesn't make any logical sense.
On top of the point that you keep
telling us the all terrorists. They don't care
about anything and they're killing everybody, but now
we're supposed to be banking on their moral
interest for the Palestinians.
I mean, it's just none of what they
makes any sense because they're lying about everything.
And as I wrote in regard to the
hostages and the families
in Israel.
This is Ryan
On the fourth saying Ben ga is refusing
to meet with Israeli hostages families.
Or rather specifically with the families, but it
also former Israeli hostages.
This is my point about why they don't
want them to come home. They know what
they don't want you to know.
So here they are. Trying to give an
audience with Ben, and he goes, I'm good
enough to sit... Or this is what they
said when he refuses to meet them. They
say, I'm good enough to hamas tunnels, but
I'm not good enough to meet you
as he writes their government is falling apart.
And they're screaming.
The point is that they screaming at these
people. And this keeps happening.
And they keep bursting into the congested chambers,
they keep saying you don't care about our
families, they don't get me this is self
evident.
It just keeps building and yet, what do
you get from your media? What do you
get from your government?
Everybody supports israel real and it's only the
terrorist supporters that don't. No. No. A lot
most is really society right now want them
to take a deal. Not necessarily because they
care about Palestine but because they want their
families to come home or the Israelis that
are there.
I simply said. As the Israeli government continues
to use the hostages in Gaza in an
attempt to emotionally manipulate the world,
both the returned hostages and the families of
these hostages are screening like Israeli government is
getting them killed and refusing to meet them.
Pay attention, western audiences.
K how at the same point. She's screaming
at them and she says, israel has made
so much noise about the hostages in Gaza.
Their care is fake.
Here's is Israeli,
it's a lana g G,
who was released from captivity in Gaza, Ben
walks away from her without meeting her. She's
shouting. I'm good enough like we said to
sit the tunnels, but not to meet you.
Her partner is apparently still being captive in
Gaza.
Zion don't care about the hot. They only
want ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
I absolutely agree with that. On that same
note, here you saw this circulating,
Right? They were highlighting all these 4 hostages
of Eva Cl, never they were murdered.
At same point I made before.
Even Her
says that they were possibly killed by Id
idea fire. You read the article? It's not
possibly.
I it says even Mainstream media Israel. Is
not admitted is not is not admitting,
is now damn typo is now admitting that
the hostages are being killed by idea of
attacks.
It's it's it's not... Whether these people were
and you could prove it, which I think
you can. We know what that's happening. Their
own hostages have said so.
Their own people have said so, their own
military personnel, their tank drivers, they're hot. Their
helicopter pilot, They told you. They were firing
on civilians. Whether ind eminent or... Deliberately.
Y Por who said she saw it. She
was in the house and then watched them
fire on them. The many different cars they
bombed as they were driving back to Gaza,
when they knew they were hostages.
The point is right now and their ind
disagreement bombing or targeted, they're killing their own
people. That's not an accident and they keep
lying about it. Why would you have to
come out and say, they were all killed
when even your own media says, no. No
No. They weren't. They were killed by your
fought by your Idea bombing?
Yet you get these
fraction of a man kind of person like
Michael Robert says, entering the ninth month.
And highlight some of these people that are
still there. Of course all the women because
they're trying to emotionally manipulate you in a
very clear way that day.
Well, okay. So if you care so much,
why are you pushing your government to take
the deal that will bring them home?
Because when this comes ahead, what they say
last time? We can't make a deal with
them loss.
They're terrorists. We have to kill them okay,
so then you can't say this and then
say that. You either care about 1 over
the other or you don't. If your whole
point is we need to bring them home
and you act like we don't care. And
then when the opportunity is there, you don't
look at it. You yell it. We shouldn't
be taking a deal, you're a ridiculous person,
which I think is the case either way,
but that's obvious.
Now, Jacob Mick did simply highlights where they
currently were as of yesterday,
going back and forth with this, and he's...
This is somebody writing for the times of
israel.
Bottom line, the is not expected to influence
the rest of the yet to be scheduled
vote. Like, that my point is first and
foremost that they already accepted this and now
they're acting like they're back to the drawing
board, which is infuriating.
But it says Israel also objects to the
updated versions call for both sides to accept
a hostage deal.
Right. So israel only once Hamas to accept
it. You have to do it not us,
It's just what we were hearing.
That's Rob, boy boy, that's what doctor a
professor Boyle said.
How is that even really honest? The earlier
version only called on Hamas to accept proposal?
How stupid is that?
The israeli mission also did not like the
updated versions inclusion of the 3 phases of
the hostage deal, ones that have already been
laid out, and once they've already agreed 2
under the assumption I think that Hamas wouldn't
take it. Finally, these israeli mission opposes new
clause in the draft that, quote.
Reject any attempt at demographic or territorial change
in Gaza, including actions that reduce the territorial
of Gaza such as through permanent establishment
officially or unofficially of so called buffer zones.
So they don't like that. You know why?
Going to explain it? They wanna do that.
That's why. They're already doing that. You know,
the whole thing we're supposed to end is
blood liable in conspiracy period anti semitism that
they're actively ethnically cleansing Gaza as we speak.
And when they include that from the Us
side, they reject it.
Because they want to do that. And he
goes on as the writer of her time
is Israel, the bureau chief and says Israel
has already advanced plans to create a security
buffer zone.
On the Gaza side of the border, which
some of its officials have insisted are temporary,
but the plan has been condemned by the
Us and international community now they reject in
the agreement anyway. Are you are you confused?
You shouldn't be.
They're doing it.
Some claim it's temporary
then when they put it in the agreement
that they have to not do that, they
go nope we'll accept it
because it's temporary. Oh, yeah.
This is how stupid they think you are
or how much they know they have influence
over people like Biden or Trump or K
or Sun act or any people in power
right now.
Now it says an update. It says Israel
objects to the updated drafts call for both
sides it be implemented hostage deal. The earlier
version only call for Mas accept The updated
draft does the same,
but also notes that the hostage deal proposal
is acceptable to israel.
You see how stupid this is, So at
the end of the day yesterday. The argument
was where it was left is that, well,
the new draft still only applies to Hamas,
but they've included that Israel says it's okay
though.
Except they have the opening to just go
never mind because we didn't agree to it.
I just... It's... This is cartoon ish.
And these people
believe that this will work.
Now, C highlights the obvious reality this is
from the fourth.
Israel plan to continue the genocide after the
ceasefire, which is exactly my point and we
already know that's the case based on their
own statements. So why not just agree to
the dumb ceasefire and then go back to
any anyway? Because they don't want their people
back.
It says, why in the... I wanna say
dumb in the sense of what they're pretending
they're lying about it and so on. Obviously,
we should all be screaming for an actual
ceasefire.
She says... This is why Hamas didn't accept
it...
And, this is what she's arguing after the
fact that I argue you could prove
that Mosque did and is ruled backed away
from it. But the point is the Israeli
work cabinet that unanimously decided to demand guarantees
from the United States for the continuation of
the war after the Ceasefire. Hamas received via
cutter, the israeli version of proposal. They said,
Israel's response does not abide the stopping of
the war or withdrawing from Gaza. It does
not agree with the principle set by Biden.
You the media is lying to
everybody directly from israeli talking points.
Here is Ben.
He's israeli security minister saying publicly, he plans
to fully ethically cleanse, So that's what he
frames it as, which I agree. But it's
not what he says, and settle in... With
only Jews in Gaza.
So this is son apparently? That says, it
says, dad, what is the solution for Gaza?
What is the solution for this very complicated
issue? And he goes, okay.
Occupation, settlement,
and encouragement of migration.
It's just so clumsy. Like this guy is
1 of the most just
rep
violent and just end and with everything they
do when you listen to speak to their
own people is screaming at the end of
Palestine how their old terrorists, We should kill
them all, they shouldn't exist,
Here he goes, you know,
my encouragement the migration because this is a
politically put out video.
Here's that goes on.
And says only in this way can we
solve the problem of gaza. Not hamas,
gaza.
Oops.
And it says,
to occupy all the land
to settle in all the land, which is
at cleansing. So I agree with the framing.
I just... The way be careful that he
doesn't say that, but it says,
and, of course, to encourage the voluntary
migration, of as many people
as possible.
So the objective is to get rid of
all the Palestinians, and you pretend that it's
voluntary.
Despite the fact that they are so
And rightly so Hell bent on staying that
they're withstanding your bombing campaigns. But now we're
gonna pretend that they're gonna voluntarily shuffle out
of the way. Right?
Here's why.
He says,
we need to live in security. Oh, no.
It says
Hold on. I thought I missed the point
there.
Oh, that's strange. Should I missed it over
the front?
I could a swore that it said,
I guess not. Well, in case, I don't
want to add my own. So the point
is he says,
voluntary as many people as possible to other
countries. We need to live in security. Okay.
So the fact that it's a gaza problem,
and at the way they live in security,
is by having
Palestinians out of the way.
There's no way to misunderstand that. In his
mind,
Gaza not a loss is the problem and
all Palestinians are what make them unsafe.
There's just no way to misunderstand that. These
people are disgusting racist terrible sub human people.
That's what we're talking about. Because they're are
framing every single Palestinian as a monster and
then pretending they're fighting for them while murdering
them all.
Here is what Matt Miller had to say
about this conversation when Sam Usa hussein he
tries to question him about whether it... They're
really committed to the Cease fire deal. Here's
what he says.
Israel that is the the roadblock to a
ceasefire right now. It is not Israel that
is a roadblock to
hostages being returned. Yeah. It really is though.
And that's what's so embarrassing about this is
he
knows that even the people in that room
know that.
Yet. His job is to just sell you
on the lie, even though he knows you're
not buying it. And it says in the
little clip there. Netanyahu says, no Gaza cease
ceasefire. Until Israel's war aims are achieved. Raising
questions over Biden peace proposal, those June first.
But, yeah, But it's only... But it's only
h, even though they've already accepted it more
than once. Or that they've offered the Ceasefire
for full exchange,
11 or 12 times now that they either
ignore it or not accepted. But it's only
Israel. Right Matt Miller,
when a complete clown.
600 trucks a day if human humanitarian assistance
coming in. That's to seat, we'll get to
that in a minute. Here he is telling
1 of the most egregious lies we can
possibly 600 trucks.
He's lying to you. About... In the only
thing in the world claiming 600 trucks, are
the spokes for israel. Based on their narrative
and a picture with nothing else to back
it up. Meanwhile, every other entity involved in
this conversation in many in the Us have
said they're continuing to hold the aid, block
the aid, shoot people that go for the
aid,
including the foreign aid workers, the flower massacre,
but I guess that's all just background noise
now because he says 600, though.
Palestinians being able to return safely return to
their neighborhoods. And eventually get to the reconstruction
of Gaza. It is a us. Okay. So
he's pretending that they're gonna get to go
back, even though they're already shooting at any
of them that goes back to their areas.
That they're gonna reconstruct even though Ben is
openly telling you that we don't want them
there, and we're gonna build it the way
we want to. Settlers are having commit
entire conventions about how they're gonna do this.
They've allotted areas. They have construction ready.
And Matt wants to wants you to believe
they're gonna let them go back and let
them rebuild.
This guy is a genocidal comp. That he
is allowing this to happen. And you know
what? I think he knows that.
My opinion. All that is on the table
on a proposal that is sitting with Hamas
as it has been sitting with Hamas for
6 days now. Is and we and we
household.
All acceptable proposal.
Follow up on.
You just decided to switch.
You see the point
Now, of course, you won't let Sam asked
the question because the question highlights how ridiculous
is, which is that if it's in front
of hamas, that means israel accepted it right,
because that's how this works. They're in a
room and they're baking up a plan. They
offer to thomas us. Moss is not in
the room with them.
Okay? So that's already what happened is this
point. It's already been given to Hamas because
her must has already accepted it because Israel
already said it was good and then they
reel back. Already made the point.
But, of course, Matt Miller has to talk
over because he's desperately aware that people see
right through him. Him. I'm saying we've had
this conversation. We've had this conversation before. Please
don't interrupt me. Please don't interrupt colleagues. I'm
might up. Thank you. I'm I'm actually not
fill out with my pleasure. Role accepted. I
I think you are interrupting her. Go ahead.
Oh, think. I mean... You think about how
embarrassing it is to avoid answering such a
basic question.
Is real accept?
We're not gonna get into all that. I'm
not gonna hypo about things. I don't know,
or just, you know,
the obvious reality that they did or I,
you get the point. I can go into
the same point again. They did because it
was offered and they broke real all. Actually,
I spokesman went for ham much just.
These sensor news goes on to make other
points you can read for yourself. Now here's
an important part of this.
I think this is very relevant.
Apparently,
Cia director burns
is the Us element that is me
the supposed diplomatic
negotiations.
Now let this person make the point because
he makes it very well.
Who the lead negotiator is for the United
States, negotiating between Hamas and Israel
Cia director burns.
Why is a Cia director?
Why is the head of the intelligence
the undercover covert intelligence wing of the United
States, Why is he
negotiating
with what we accuse of, a terrorist group
and Israel's political party. Why is he the
inter?
That's not that's not a role for an
intelligence officer. That's a role for a diplomat?
That's a role for a statesman.
That is not a role for a career
intelligence official Somebody whose job is to lie
and steal and cheat without getting caught. It
shows how the United States views
the conflict between Hamas and. It shows that
the United States does not view it through
a diplomatic lens.
Otherwise, they'd put a senior ambassador in there.
They put a statesman in there. They'd put
somebody from the president's cabinet in there.
Yeah. I think the the point I agree
everything.
Think the major point to make is that's
because they do not want or rather that
Israel does not want this to resolve. And
they're the ones I think influencing the outcome
here even from within the United States.
And here here is just a quick little,
you know, update on just searching for this
in general. There's plenty of articles about it.
Cia Director Byrne in visits Cairo. Got a
Ceasefire.
This says Cia Director Burns has been actively
involved in negotiations to broker a fire deal
and hostage deal between israel Hamas Gaza.
So you're telling me he's working with Qatar,
the group that is protecting Hamas were told
that Israel's is totally angry about even though
they're allowing it to happen and have cap
petition them in the past to keep funding
him off.
Right. It just... It... There's obviously a bigger
game going on, and it's very easy to
see that has nothing to do with peace
or diplomacy. It's about keeping their agenda going.
Now here's it what's interesting Zachary Cohen highlights.
In Cia assessment,
you know, realizing the burns is the 1
media the whole thing, suddenly, as of today,
a Cia assessment circulated among Us officials this
week concluded that Netanyahu likely judges he can
get away with defining
without defining a post war plan.
Even as Biden ned pressures him to bring
an end to the conflict. Now let's be
clear.
Cia does not necessarily mean in line with
the executive branch. Usually it's quite the opposite.
But at the very least, you can see
that they're in some way aligned, I think
with the Israeli agenda, but just recognizing that
intelligence is not always the same as saying
what the current executive branch thinks.
But what... This is just interesting to me.
So this c... This is a Cia... Cnn
article,
this Cia assessment, which burns the head of
or is putting out a circulating for whatever
reason? Well, Netanyahu can believes he can just
not define the plan. Now is that meant
to set that tone? Is that meant to
suddenly nudge him into doing so. I don't
know, but it seems very manipulative.
We are being played in every possible way.
It doesn't mean that they're all necessarily in
the same
in in line for the same agenda that
they want the same outcome. But in every
angle these people are not there to give
you the truth or to media some cease
ceasefire in the interest of Palestinians
They're actively fighting to 8 to in... To
gain what they want from this for their
interest almost always at the expense of the
people involved.
That's government for you.
Now on I'm speaking of qatar,
mastery of foreign affairs of Qatar. On Twitter
posted their statement.
Cutters strongly condemns
Israeli occupation bombing of the school, which we'll
talk about next.
Interesting.
This was today.
Now I get the feeling this might change
a couple things.
We might see different narratives spin around. We
might see things actually have... I think I
wait and see. There's a lot you gotta
apologize about. But seeing Cutter who is involved
with the mediation who I argue in some
way or overlap with the interest of what
they deal with a moss in regard to
Israel
are now criticizing their actions. Maybe because they
see an interest in it because they genuinely
think that, but I think Israel in their
typically bell and immature way are going to
freak make a statement about this and we'll
see where that goes. Whether that's them I'm
trying to switch up the hamas narrative about
only cutter or maybe going after cut? I
don't know. But it will ultimately expose Israel's
interest in all of. I argue. We'll see.
Now talking about the school.
I mean, I wanted to make sure we
highlighted this. Now, the main point, like I
said the other day,
this is...
I mean, actually, I should've have brought up
the
I don't wanna try to find it right
now. But I mean, this is...
It's unbelievable how many schools? How many hospitals?
How many every am element of this are
so far beyond what we've ever seen before.
The amount of civilians the amount of bombing
they've used more than world war 2. It's
unreal.
So my point is this is just 1
long string of
illegitimate, war crime,
genocidal attacks on schools full of children. The
fact that that's even debatable.
The people are arguing, No. No. Here's why
that's okay is chilling.
In Airs strike, on the Un run, all
Sa School in Central Gaza has now killed
40 people including 14 children.
Spokesperson said the agency quote has paid the
highest toll ever over the 8 past months.
And this is just showing you sad images
shelter setting 10.
That's is their interview with her, and that
she's from An.
Here's another example, a large number of displaced
palestinians were killed in the israeli airs strike
that target the under school. This 1 in
a new threat refugee camp.
Now here's is what's interesting.
Thank you to we are all Palestine for
highlighting this.
Tar highlights this saying we've reached the point
where Israel's just like, yeah, we did it.
We just bombed you un school serving as
a shelter for refugees, so what?
That's that's how he frames it right, but
that's kind of the sentiment we feel right
now. Why waste time,
pre...
What is that?
I don't think I already seen that 1.
You know, that's just a speaking eva way.
That's interesting I have to look that. It's
always interesting to see new things.
Or get basically getting think apologies lying about
this. If you ever face any accountability anyways.
Right? Like, so they never get held accountable,
They never seem to actually have any pushback
from the from the most of the people
that are acting like they care about this.
So why
act why put for 4? Like, why not
just own... Like, that's what he's saying Why
don't not just go, yeah. We did it
so what? I think there's a reason for
that. I think that there's an important dynamic
involved
for at least putting forward the illusion for
those that you still may be manipulating or
those that don't want to see the truth
that'll always be on your side as long
as you don't push them hard enough.
But so this is the breakdown saying is
israeli military admits to attack by jet fighters
on un school. Right? This is... But the
point is now they're owning it but they're
just going but Hamas was there.
That's actually exactly like we all expected, that
is what's happening.
Now here is another back and forth.
Matt Miller,
as of yesterday,
talking about the Un school. Here's how we
responds. It's painful.
Not crossed the red line that the president
laid out, you know, several weeks ago. This
is the second incident in less than 2
weeks where we've seen a pretty large civilian
toll on what was supposed to be a
precision strike. So with with respect to the
policy that the president announced, he was speaking
specifically to a large scale
operation in Raf and we have not yet
seen a large scale operation conducted in Raf.
That said,
we have seen... So that continues to be
the game. At least to be begin with.
Oh, it's not large yet. Okay. So as
long as we keep saying it's small, they
can do what they want? Yes.
Hasn't crossed a large line yet, even though
we waffle about what that really looks like.
Apparently according to Kirby until they're lined up
in columns marching down the street, it's not
a large operation, which by the way,
guarantees that they'll continue bombing and discrimination from
the sky which guarantees more civilian casualties than
if they were to actually go in and
surgical invade. But, you know, the Us won't
allow it, so they'll keep in criminal bothering
civilians because Matt Miller says. That's basically what's
happening.
Strikes that put civilians in danger
well before the president said that, and we
have made clear to the governor of Israel
that we expect them to do everything that
they can to minimize civilian harm.
We've been Another 1 of the game the
entire time, Well, as long as they claim
they're doing their best,
It's all okay.
Despite breaking records across the board, hey, They...
They're trying their best, Matt says. So stop
being stop being rude.
She embarrassed. This before it applies in this
situation too. It is a difficult situation. If
it is true
that you have this site where Hamas is
hiding inside a school, other... If it's true,
okay. So you're giving them the benefit of
the doubt. They've said this about every school
in every hospital in every location they bomb,
they claim are killing civilian. Hamas was present,
and even human rights groups. Even the Un
said the onus is on you.
You can't just keep saying that. This was
the first week. That said you have to
prove that. They never have
The Us is doesn't care about that. The
rules based international lawyer goes, yeah, We'll just
take your word for that.
It's not about anything other than politics, guys.
They're were siding with their ally. For the
interest of either because they're compromised or for
some interest we can't see. Because I'm saying
that because they're seemingly destroying everything around them
to maintain a life Israel. That we all
see and everybody knows a lie.
Militants are hiding inside of school. Those individuals
are legitimate targets, but at the same time,
they're embedded near civilians. Israel has a right
to try and target those civilians, but they
also have the obligation to
minimize civilian harm and take
sorry. I was muted. So he definitely just
said that they have the right to kill
civilians. Now, as I understand it,
You can call it freudian slip. You can
say that he meant it. But as I
understand that, I think Matt Lee followed up
and addressed it, and he... He was like,
oh, sorry. I meant the other way around.
Which, you know, whatever. That whether or not
he meant to say has the right to
kill the militants. They're killing civilians. So it's
kind of a moot point. But what's hilarious
about it is that's exactly what's happening. We
see it happening. Every group in the world
that is other than Matt Miller in the
Us. Government are calling that out. And so
he just accidentally said they have right to
kill civilians, which, by the way, is exactly
what Israel's argument is.
It's be... You just 1 step removed. It's
because human shields that we have a right
to kill those people. That's what their argument
is. That's why this gets so absurd right
now. What is about to say.
Because you we all know this. Their argument
is that they can kill them because not
our phone. How moss is using them. And
they even have their lavender down. They can
kill a hundred people, They go after 1
Hamas member that's big enough. That's their own
argument, which doesn't align with any law anywhere.
In fact that it's a violation of every
law everywhere, but they just wrote it down,
so it's okay. Right?
And so the argument becomes
we are cleaning, we can and have the
right to kill civilians as long as sam
Moss is doing, we claim they're doing even
though we don't prove it. So that is
true. Even if it was a slip.
Every step possible be. Gonna be clear,
they believe is true. In fact, it's shockingly
illegal and g task, but they believe it.
That's a civilian harm. So that's Israel has
a right to try and target those civilians,
but they also have the obligation to
minimize civilian harm and take every step possible
to minimize civilian harm. So that's... And the
idea that they're was to take every step
possible to my civilian harm.
That's verifiable false when they are ind inappropriately
bombing food trucks and bombing aid workers from
other countries and snip children waving red flat...
White flags. It's... I mean, this is the
point about how infuriating this is. They all
see the same stuff. They just ignore it.
What then stand up and say that they're
taking unprecedented action to minimize human every human
group rights group, every element that's highlighted this
have done their own investigations, even corporate media
has said, no, sorry, they're targeting civilians.
It's it's just comic stupid. You know, I
should say because it's so serious and real,
but in its own right. I mean, it's
laughable. How these people continue just a state
the lie.
No where when when the evidence is overwhelming
in 1 direction they just go, but Israel
said.
That's why we were pressing,
the government of Israel and the idea to
be completely transparent about what happened here. We
wanna know the facts
as much as anyone. They, you know, facts
are?
Don't ask. We already did. We didn't kill
him you're liar.
Every single time, they don't investigate. They don't
even show you anything. If they pretend they
did, they just claim the outcome. Well, we
did and here's the outcome. There's no evidence.
There's no research
and yet even sometimes after that fake conclusion,
Matt miller pretends like they're still investigating. I've
shown you that live on the show.
They taken every step possible?
We have seen as much as anyone. Have
they taken every step possible?
We have seen them take improvements over over
time, but still,
if it if it bears true that this
strike it results in the death of 14
children. If it bears true,
you see now this is disgusting. This gets
into the realm of them. Lay. So if
you're gonna find Alex Jones a billion dollars
for denying the fact that children died Sandy
hook, even though there's a lot of things
that you should look into in that conversation
we've talked about on the show itself.
You're out pretending you don't know those children
got killed. Even though it's verifiable facts, even
though international bodies have acknowledged even their bodies
can be seen on the video, but, you
know, we are not sure because it could
be...
How is that different?
The results are way... I'll even take us
that further? How about the fact that is
worse because what they're doing is in real
time allowing them to keep doing that right
now. Children dying this moment as I speak,
are Matt Miller fault,
along with a lot of other people that
are allowing it to continue. To me, that's
a hell of a lot worse. It need
to be. So it gets back to this
question of intent and results even if the
intent is what the,
Idea has said publicly that they were trying
to hit use a precision precision strike just
to target 20 to 30 militants. If... Oh,
or you mean 20 to 30 civilians around
1, is what they keep telling you the
reality is or the fact that they're not
precision targeting anything with dumb bombs bombed on
the top of refugee camps, which is what
they're using in most cases.
Do you have seen 14 children die in
that strike that shows that something went wrong.
That said, these are all facts that need
to be verified and that's what we wanna
see happen. Oh, yeah. Oops see something went
wrong.
Yeah. That's all... In other words, that's a
crime Matt. Somebody. You don't just get to
go whoops seat. We messed. We aim the
wrong thing. We'd we use the wrong button.
It's not a it's not how that goes.
But according to him,
if was any other adversaries, this would already
be shuffling through... Like, the point is the
acts We have to wait till the end
of all is to rehash everything and investigate
all the acts.
Not what you did with Russia. Is that
what we do with China. That we do
anybody iran or anybody else you aim at.
These are just disgusting hip crease that are
gas lighting for genocide as we speak.
Now, oh, this was Marshall just highlighting the
same clip. I wasn't sure if that was
in that 1 before I grab that. But
at same point, just a quick clip saying
that we have a right to kill civilians.
Now, is the squirrel highlights, 8 months,
8 months of genocidal slaughter. After slaughter
and lie after lie to cover it up
and steal the media class, Bbc Reuters and
white New York Times
du.
Lead the Israeli propaganda line, quote, there was
a hamas there.
Right? After each massacre,
without any evidence to back it up. As
just now at the bombing of the Un
school,
Most of them just repeated what Israel said.
And they all do it with the pride
and gl. He says they love it. Now,
that's his opinion, but I agree it seem
to be going along with it. All these
sc who cryo hysterical as they write oh
my god blood bath, massacre on Ukraine by
evil Putin Hitler. Just love white washing and
laundering daily Israeli genocidal massacres of babies.
He goes on to highlight it's not just
8 months. The israeli regime has been doing
this for nearly a century. Masculine and Palestinian
women, children babies and then just plain lying
about it. Over and over and over. We
highlighting with finally people are paying attention. He
says they killed journalists and nurses in broad
daylight literally on camera and still their lies
Their doctor fake videos and photos get New
York Times and Bbc headlines and the entire
framing is, yeah, These really claim is definitely
true. The rest of some Moscow.
Remember, They killed a
an American journalist.
Not like that's any more important than any
the other journalist. The point was as an
American and as the American support for Israel
seems to be the most important thing, they
ignored it. Didn't even talk about it. Now
this is Ab S ab share S Abu
clay.
Not only did they lie about it, then
they lied again and got caught. Lied again
and got caught until the fourth time they
ended going fine we shot her but his
accidents.
Maybe a shade. That's kinda where it ended
up I think, and then proceeded to beat
everybody who were carrying her coffin. Just to
pay you back for highlighting that they were
liars.
What happened?
Now he goes go over go look over
at the New York time Bbc Reuters Ap
reports on Russian strikes in Ukraine. Thank
He says in... Whoops.
That weird.
Go and look at the ones in Ukraine
and try to find a single example. Literally
just 1 of them leading the headline when
first sentence with Russia said the building was
used by the Az Nazis or Az Militants.
It's a fair point, they've said that about
a lot of them and many cases has
turned out to be true,
but they don't say it because they're sla
for clear political interests. That's not journalists. You're
not a journalist. And they know that. Most
of them somewhere inside, Have realized that at
some point.
He says 504 children killed in 2 years
there, but they're been to the West media
class. Palestinians are sub human to them because
they're nazis. There's zion nazis who divide humanity,
you know, the the narratives are spinning out.
The point is Here's John Kirby
embody this ideology, the narratives and even the
fake crocodile tears to sell you on 1
versus the other.
Hard to look
at what he's doing in Ukraine. What is
forces are doing in Ukraine?
And think
that any
ethical,
moral
individual could justify that. It's difficult
to look at the
Sorry. It's difficult to look at some of
the images
and imagine that any well thinking
serious mature leader would do that.
So
I can't
talk to a psychology.
But I think we can all speak to
us to p. This is war. It is
combat.
It is bloody. It is ugly, and it's
gonna be messy.
And
innocent civilians
are going to be hurt going forward. I
wish I could tell you something different. I
wish that that wasn't gonna happen.
But it is it is going to happen.
And
that doesn't make it right. It doesn't make
it
dismiss. It it doesn't mean that we aren't
gonna still
express concerns about that and and do everything
we can to help the Israelis, do everything
they can to minimize it.
But
But that's that's... Unfortunately, the the nature of
conflict. All I can tell you is we're
gonna continue to make sure Israel
has the tools and the capabilities that they
need to defend themselves. Gonna continue to try
to get that humanitarian assistance in. We're gonna
continue to try to get hostages and and
people out of Gaza appropriately.
And as I think you've heard us say,
a cease ceasefire right now,
really only benefits from us.
That's where we are right now. And there's
not. Understand the question, but I'm just not
gonna get ahead of Yeah. That that was
the beginning of it Where where even... He's
israeli media or the government was saying, well,
hostage are secondary.
Yeah. Now it's pretending that it didn't happen
phase. Clearly, that's what they were. Well, we
can't even get into that.
So they allowed this to continue right up
until this point. But think about what he
was doing right there. The the lot... Like,
I made the point then. If you believe
for 1 second that John Kirby, who somebody
who has been involved with this stuff for
a very long time. Seen some terrible things
is going to call the memory of an
image. He didn't have it in front of
them and get choked up by it? I
mean, I saw that stuff too. What are
you pointing at? What what right right there
jumped into your mind that caused you to
break down in tears. As he was lying
very clearly. It wasn't even that convincing.
And then and and then while we're watching
children get blown to pieces and be beheaded
by their bombing, we can't even... You don't
even acknowledging that.
Not buying. Now here's what z scroll finished
with saying, after all this and starting with
again, the idea of the Un bought... The
the school bombing,
He's saying, okay. After all that, get ready
for another fake doctor video or audio to
be released and to deflect from the newest
cycle of their latest massacre and be headings
of babies and children women an entire media
class once again using it to wander the
Genocidal massacre, and then Bang Bang Boom it's
exactly what happened right after that.
This is from yesterday. And I just love
this little break clip. I think I'm... I'm
not sure who made this. Might have been
got here, but it's a... It's like a
5 second clip of, Abby Martin, I'll play
for in a second. But look at what
they did again.
Every
single time,
That's why it's so humorous to look in
in a, dark way. What z with the
squirrels just said. Get ready for... And he
called it get ready for another fake audio
that they've already been caught for, like, 3
times where they can prove it was a
constructed audio or people that weren't even arabic
or speaking Arabic
or
things like this.
They go, here's an aerial photo of the
building that we say hamas was in and
what's the proof,
red stuff with circles.
Proof.
No. Not at all in fact, But it
says, wait hey, this is Scott Ritter says,
when can we cross examine you in court?
How do we handle discovery? Shut up already.
You're guilty? So The point is this is
so embarrassing.
You think that's evidence for you to just
state your narrative with a graphic?
It's bare it's really bad And so this
is what Ab... What's what he poured out
for Abby Martin, which was a previous example,
but it's the exact point.
See the building is red.
That means Hamas is there.
That's that is that is the perfect level
of of of ridicule.
They're treating you like your 5.
See, I put the red around the building.
That's because bad guy there. That's what they're
doing.
Is it... And then washing our hands of
it? We're done. Right? Didn't we prove it
to you? Aren't you supposed to blindly trust
what israel real says about everything? Is that
what we've been used to for 75 years?
Yeah, pretty much.
Lot time 75 years, but for a long
period.
Well, here is what some of the lead
prop have been saying about this bombing.
Same thing. No evidence to back it up,
just stating the narrative. Here's Bbc going Israeli
strike on Un school kills 35.
And or the the supposed international human rights
lawyer named Arson trotsky says, no. Israel did
not strike a Un school in Gaza even
though that's even if you claim a losses
there, it's still a Un school, dummy, but
he goes Israel targeted hamas terrorists
who were embedded in a Un school, the
latter being a gross war crime.
Right. Not bombing the school or killing 30...
14 children, but the claim that Hamas might
be there is the crime.
As long as the west, he says dip
mass leaders media cannot distinguish this...
Okay. Distinguish applies that there's things that you're
looking between.
What you're doing is going
narrative
And then they're going, here's the video. The
children never were killed. The evidence that was
there, People on the ground. Journalists that said
they were no homo hamas members, doctors who
saw to say,
Evidence evidence evidence have almost proof.
And you just go narrative and that's them
distinguishing between you screaming something and facts?
Yeah. I wonder why they're can not confused.
It says they bold hamas and perpetuate the
violence. These are desperate people.
There's no way that they didn't recognize that
they're losing this.
And that's the best they got. And, of
course, I just simply post this beneath him.
Independent review in April of this year found
no evidence that Israel's claims were correct.
Oops.
I love that. Mean I made it up
source.
No, Of course, this is funny to me
that this is... Oh. It's got the Israel
flag on it. So it's not to me.
It's about what Israel's doing.
But here's Elon Levi doing the same damn
thing. And here's Philippe philippe Pla.
And again, he is the
commissioner general of Un,
another perfect day in Gaza, another un school
turned to turn shelter attacked.
This time in n, You know, the area
they've supposedly
secured like 4 times now.
Hit my by israeli forces without prior warning
So that's important to this. Right? But despite
all of their claims, Hamas present and so
on, they're supposed to be like, hey, civilians.
Get out of the way. And that's the
only thing like got this it's clear
even when they do that and then bomb
these schools, hospitals and so on, they're still
breaking a along.
Collective punishment
is the reality no matter what their claims
are. That was the point from the very
beginning. From you international rights, human... Human rights
lawyers, the Un just because they said him
hamas president doesn't mean they got away with
killing up, but they're gonna do it still.
But the point is then Israel made the
difference by the, you know, the the caveat
by saying, but we're giving them time to
leave and they really pushed. That's why they
weren't breaking a lot.
So now they don't do that anymore. Nobody
cares. They just bombed the building didn't try
to give a chance why because they wanna
kill all the palestinians.
But here's what he says. When I say
you and officials are covering for hamas, this
is what I mean?
What What what am I'm missing? Right? Is
there something else posted there? What do... So
you mean that he's saying the thing that
you're claiming as a lie? Like, is that
supposed to be convincing, Usually when you say
something like that, you're... It's like a big
brand point. See, Like that's him saying that
doesn't prove that you're... That you're telling the
truth. This is just you saying I disagree.
But he goes claims some operating out of
At facilities are not shocking,
This is Ham hamas.
This is the fifth Un's facility in a
month that they've bar sure. There's been not
a single point of evidence to suggest Moss
was there. A moss routinely operates operated us
civilian sites if you don't know this resign.
Okay. Get the point. The best they can
do. Same thing here at same link is
just state the opposite.
And the real point is that across the
board.
The United States, Canada, the Un,
multiple independent reviews. I mean, countries around the
world have come back and said this is
from March. Israel has yet to provide any
evidence to back up those claims about October
seventh or being in Hamas. Here is from
April 20 second. Of this year, Israel has
yet to provide evidence of un unrest staff
terrorist links.
Here's Npr from April 20 third, reports on
un unwritten concludes
Israel has not provided evidence of their mil.
This is from April 20 eighth, and this
is the biggest 1. An independent review finds
no evidence for Israel's claims about un run
a mosque. So this has been malt reviewed
numerous times. And if you're
of the mind that israel has presenting evidence
or rather that they have an opportunity to,
and they didn't hear
explain that for me. So if you think
it's completely sound and the evidence is overwhelmingly
clear, wouldn't they just give it, wouldn't they
be going here? Look, it's right there. And
if they did, and they still didn't find
it, they obviously there's lies taking place, and
it's not about 1 group versus the other.
It's everybody except israel. Even the United States
elements have been like, there's not in the
evidence.
And I'll... I'm meant just for time I'm
gonna skip over this, but just really quickly,
un themselves, which in on top of it
on them
the group being accused, challenging it is never
the best way to reach people, but nonetheless,
Un self has said they're lying.
Citing alleged intelligence estimates about them working with
got the. They simply go unrest not received
any information, let alone in the evidence from
Israel about whether that
never see a single thing.
Which of course, Israel says they're...
You Their narrative is that they're not gonna
work with them anyway But the point is
that nobody, the Genre, the United Nations,
United States, Canada, nobody has seen this because
it doesn't exist.
In in regard to what they're claiming.
It's certainly, I mean, even likely that there's
an overlap there because they forced thomas hamas
into power funded them into power Israel did
in Gaza, and then made it so people
in Gaza couldn't do anything without working through
the government, which was a odd at the
time, so there's a lot of overlaps there.
Doesn't mean everybody's terrorism some,
but that's what they're claiming. And but then
even then, on top of that possible likelihood,
The evidence isn't if for any of it.
Now you can read to this for yourself.
Now, of course, that's why they're getting condemnation
from across the board.
As they are pushing the idea of labeling
An as a terrorist organization.
Now, this is just a an on, you
know, other than the on school or the
different bombing you've seen in the starvation tactics
we'll get you in a second. This just
never ending, guys.
These are just from the last 2 days,
I understand.
Or as I remember, because... I just I
think I've included some new things, but I
don't forget any of them are older than
a couple of days.
Dear A law in the central Gaza strip,
this evening as of the sixth.
I mean, this image is what I use
for today's show. It's just
self explanatory.
The area where the Israeli army instructed civilians
to evacuate. K. So over here, you have
them bombing a school without even telling anybody,
knowing there were civilians knowing that they were
refugees, people staying their children, women sickly, they
bombed all. 14 children died.
Here,
you're looking at the location that they were
told to go to be safe. Nothing new
there either.
Look at a, look at these civilians.
Just standing in the street, that is like
a block down the road.
That's what they're dealing with.
They're bombing where they're supposed to be safe.
There is no safe. That's the point.
And I'll include this for those that Haven't
seen it.
Hr covering the New York Times investigation, Israel
used the most destructive bombs in their safe
areas.
Surprise surprise is nothing new.
Here
Israel's committing major massacres in the central region
of Gaza killing at least a hundred and
50 people in the last 24 hours, most
of the limited children. This is from the
sixth.
Just to the wrap up of the day.
Another hundred and 50 random people killed most
women and children, but the most more alarming
the world. Pick taking best possible, you know,
all possible routes to avoid civilian casualties and
they just arbitrarily murder 50 people. Most civilians
all women and children.
Or I only... I most women and children.
As far as I could tell, there's not
a single prove example of any officer was
being killed.
I always argue that's highly unlikely, but nonetheless,
we have yet to see a single example
of a proven.
Sad morning, My points out for Gaza during
the night. This was on the sixth over
into, I believe from a fifth to the
sixth.
During the night, Israeli occupation forces 1 committed
horrible crimes by bombing of a refugee shelter
in All nose that's the Un school. Killing
27 or I think it up to 34
after he published this. Committed crime, another crime
by bombing, the a family, and all Burr,
Refugee camp killing 7. Committed a third crime
in the bombing of a house hosting displaced
people in on this rhett, killed 2 people
in a bombing house of of Dire ba
law killed several people in separate attacks Cross
gaza.
This is
Ram abdul from Euro med human rights Group.
The Israeli Army has resulted resumed shelling Palestinian
civilians as they attempt to inspect their own
homes. I was just telling you about this.
After the army withdraws.
Either with drones or faraway away munitions. These
people they've withdrawn, and then they just set
traps and shoot people and bomb them just
because they're going back.
This is civilians who are also recovering... There's
civilians who are recovering bodies of those who
who've been crushed. By israeli tanks. Some alive,
some not.
Like I said, alive wouldn't happen right there.
He also highlights his really drone, bombed a
group of children.
In the Z neighborhood of East Gaza injuring
30 people. This is just another day in
Gaza right now, guys, what's all about the
most cat... Like, these are all children. Look
at the images for yourself.
There's no denying what's going on. There's just
not, and they are murdering children at a
rate. I've never before. I don't think anybody's
has ever seen before.
Now, since last October, they have dropped over
75000
tons of bombs.
The Gaza strip exceeding the combined totals.
They were dropped on Dresden, Hamburg and London
during world war 2.
But, you know, taking the most precautions possible.
No 1 believes that.
75 tons. So let's just make it 1000
temp ton bombs.
That's 75000
of them.
And then we know if it's not all,
those big barley. Clearly, this is un unprecedented.
Now as I highlighted briefly, yes, day just
to continue to show you the things are
happening. Max Blu highlights that Israeli officers have
pro based on cnn investigations or other I
think this 1 was, no. That never mind.
This 1 was the phasing out of it,
but there was...
Which 1 was it? I think it was
the New Times investigation as well as a
couple of others that that literally talked about
this stuff.
Palestinian and prisoners to death
after kidnapping them in a concentration camp, according
to a leaked Un report, 1 prisoner said
interrogation, quote, made me sit on something like
a hot stick and felt like fire. He
said another detain he died if they put
that electric stick up his anus.
That's the reality, this is the new Times.
Let that sink in for a I can
recognize who you're actually supporting. You know, I
think the problem is that most of people
that support israel don't care about that. In
fact, they like that. They go, yeah, Kill
those palestinians. That seems to be what I'm
seeing every day.
But if you haven't seen this, I'm hoping
this is shocking you into understanding what's going
on. And all of a sudden,
israel real phasing out the use of that
exact camp.
Which simply shows you that they're recognizing that
people are seeing what they're doing. They don't
care about it. They know they're doing it.
They just don't want you to recognize it.
Mom and she had simply highlight the same
story. Israel's raping, kidnapped go in the...
I pronounced that the Sa prison camp, a
Go and D point. It's just, Don't wanna
say it again. Horrible stuff.
Cuts news network highlights today,
another
Mass grave. After Israeli occupation forces withdrew from
the area of Palestinian discovered a mass grave
in Jab Refugee camp in Northern Gaza.
Where they have gone back numerous times bombed
in script even caught for it over and
over and over.
And this is just another gaza reporter from
the ground, highlighting the same another mass grave
in Northern Gaza.
Now here's just 2
upsetting video. So after all the... After... With
what's going on.
Supposedly waging a war against thomas us while
you're just insecure killing anybody in front if
you're including your own people,
and israeli military operation the West Bank.
I'll straight the video.
Going after a child because they wrote free
Palestine on a wall.
Sort like in the Us where you just
posted the wrong thing about Israel, and then
rather than a Uk more off at this
point, show up at your door and say
you said the wrong thing,
free palestine. So you wrote.
Now watch the way this looks?
This is what you see with an army
that it's pride itself on attacking children and
women.
Clearly, you're making a big point about this.
I think it's because you a win.
You're... We won by getting this child.
This is posted on Israeli channel.
Oh, how brave, what a real real life
professional army you are?
Here is another example.
This is just a a quick example, which
is happening constantly
of a... Of a young kid on a
scooter.
And his israeli Id Jeep comes up behind
him, shoots him,
stops to make sure he's dead, then moves
forward.
This is the daily life for average Palestinians.
Shoots him right there, falls off. Clearly shot.
It just dies right there. Just dead.
Stop, make sure. I can't tell if they
shoot them again. Doesn't look like it. I
think it might have something move right there.
But that's it. Just move along. Right. So
if this was supposedly the only democracy in
at least when they stop and go is
he okay? Can we get your medical treatment?
Does anybody actually buy those lies?
Here's a
an unnerving video,
and this is in regard to the crimes
that have been committed and publicly posted by
the very people acting like they're not doing
this.
He says an organizational culture systematically d palestinians.
To be honest, I've never seen anything like
that in 15 years of study of our
coffee.
The fact that our soldiers
themselves
taking them and uploading them, it shows that
the reason
organizational of culture
systematically d human on your palestinians
Here we are talking about an open up
knowledge.
In front of comments, by the person uploading
it that torture
has been
inflicted
on these detainees.
We have seen
soldier joy to be destroying toys stores,
private property from family houses
or
displaying their pictures with the,
degrading approaches to Palestinian women.
This is also a word crime.
When we are talking about 01/02/2014
incident.
It makes sense
to just talk about our crimes.
However, here, we are we are in something
different.
Interestingly enough as the article rights it says
the Israeli government released a legal paper in
November,
supporting the military actions in gaza.
Yeah. It says the paper repeatedly refers to
civilians and Gaza as human shields.
That's the point we're making from day 1.
They they made these categories where there was
no way you could exist there without being
in 1 of them. Either you voted for
them and support them, you're being used to
human shield or you're refused to get out
of the way. Are not our fault. So
no matter what they did, they could make
an excuse to say that's that's on them.
And so here... The point is in this
discussion. They're not saying proof examples where we
can see their used human shield just any
palestinian is regarded as a human shield by
default, by being in Gaza, and what's interesting
is that's actually the argument made about all
of Israel and the
illegal settlements, perfectly surrounded, like, basically a human
she'll barrier around what's going on are the,
them Id headquarters of the massage headquarters in
Tel aviv, Like in the center surrounded by
all, it's clear the way that they engage
with this or the pro example of the
use human shields called the neighbor procedure.
By scenes or the target of the army
largest and largest and largest
until it covers the entire you've got. These
poses
and
substantial threat to the international legal system.
So we should be all mobilizing.
For defending. These boundaries is... These are minimum
boundaries.
Below which there is only an analysis
And this is The
that has unfolded in these.
It just it just highlighting for those the
podcast they've documented torture, sexual abuse,
dog attacks,
much of what you could see on video.
But it's all denied and gas lit.
You're a racist. Did you talk about it?
People having their pants bound so tight the
f panther are him and amputated I mean,
it's just... It's just overwhelming. Arms and embargo
and sergeant.
Political leaders that
do not push those
are some declaring
that the Policy population can be eliminated.
Right. And let's not forget that what we
just talked about, the Un has now put
them on a blacklist for those that kill
children.
Every they should be sanctioned, And it should
be removing these. So thank you to,
thank you to
go start in the rumble chat. They just...
That they just post this link. And this
is Lens doctor Lens Ver, of Ver,
highlighting a new clip. A new clip that
is surfaced, exposing the inhumane treatment of policy
detainees. Now this is, I argue probably from
this same camp that we just got... We're
just talking about.
Is chen is Israel's channel 13 exclusive shows
female soldiers selecting palestinians means from above the
message cage d them as monsters.
Now it's in hebrew.
I can't... I don't know what they're saying,
but the point is that they're
treating them like animals.
My god.
And realized, this is why we have yet
to get a approval example of a hamas
member.
And and it also realized that even the
new york Times is breaking down rape, torture,
dog attacks. That's what they're talking about in
these locations.
It's amazing the amount of evidence we have
right now and yet people are still debating
this stuff.
Here's a great exchange of site Ara and
site Ara and say and Matt Miller. Another
embarrassing 1 form. But here is here is
Sai highlighting,
self evident truths, Matt Miller, sidestep in them
as always.
Sarah was an area that there's really even
did not ask people to evacuate. I mean,
this is really
And what what we were just talking about.
Right? Highlighting an example where they bombed the
location where they knew civilians were and did
not even try to get them out of
the way.
Refugees. They killed 64 people. You don't know
I'm west killed. I mean, you know what
possible about it? I want to ask you
because you... The other day, you said that
maybe
Prefers, you know, the safety of the tunnel,
the comfort of the tunnel to coming out
and so. So why would Hamas Militants? What
possible, tactical advantage or strategic advantage
for them, to be in this school. Even
that's just like, you know, that
red herring something that des really could use
time and time and time again as Yep.
You know, a cover to continue to go
people. I mean, considering that you know, a
hundred and 30 civilians were killed in the
preceding 24 hours. So the advantage to Hamas
and it is a sick advantage to them
is that they think
they can hide behind civilians and prevent from
from being struck. And there have been times.
I can tell you, hold on. There have
been times that
we know that Israel has passed on taking
strikes because there were a mob kidding me?
Militants who were embedded directly with civilians. And...
I mean, how... Let's let's talk about that
How in the world you make in our
argument?
That they've passed on bombing civilians
because they were there. Even though we've heard
endlessly that if they're there... It's because of
hamas not get... They have a right to
bomb them.
Why why would they just go then Okay,
Not that 1, though? I just don't feel
like it.
Where's the logic here? It realized the whole
reality... And, look okay, He just toy pointed
out that there were... I mean, the the
972 magazine highlighted that they already have a
ratio. They they claim they can kill 1
to 200 innocent people based on a high
level mosque commander
or just a high level loss member,
So you're gonna tell me that they would
pass on a on 10 civilians being killed
because off too much. They have a very
clear stated logic that they can go as
high as that.
So he just... It this is the point.
Everything they say you can point. I mean,
even the same day half. I'm even the
same briefing. You can point things that they
said in the beginning when you go, that
contradicts what you just said.
Sometimes it gets highlighted by the few select
people under there that care to highlight these
things and you know I point them out
every time.
But that's just sad. And they made the
decision that they could not take a strike
against a militant without causing disproportionate civilian harm.
So that disproportionate. So I guess more than
200 people dead for 1 person, you know,
like the Or Refugee camp, and even wolf
Blitz or couldn't accept that. 200 dead people
plus actually. For 1 person that wasn't even
there. So, I guess we don't circle back
and go, okay. Now it's a crime since
there wasn't a guy there? No. We don't
care or Matt doesn't care really? That has
happened. And there are there are militants who
were not... There were strikes that they did
not take because of that... Because of that
reason. Now Can somebody please follow up on
that? I'll try myself, but let's I'd love
to prove that. Show me 1 example where
Israel has done that or even stated that
they've done that. And I'd love to see
that I've done how many people? What was
the logic?
I don't believe it. I flat out Don't
believe that. I don't think that's true. Now
with respect to this 1, we need to
know exactly what happened. As I said, as
you just point out there are conflicting accounts
about what exactly happened here and we need...
All we have is that Israel says, no,
no. Bad guys remember, and then you believe
it. That's the conflicting accounts. Everybody else has
the same thing. The truth.
Need to get to the bottom of it.
You know, we are no military expert tech
at least, I speak about myself, but 1
knows from breathing so much and so on.
In, the the the safety of the rubble
area, the city the safety of the destroyed
cities and buildings and so on that becomes
a concrete jungle. It's a lot safer for
these spiders. There would be no incentive to
whatsoever for them to go and be among
their families and so on. Because the 4
is probably better in the tunnels or in
these places.
Safety is a lot better. Why would they
do it? So we just... Alright. So... Again,
too much logic from matt Miller. The point
is that he's highlighting the obvious thing that...
Okay. Well, what's the benefit here?
While she... No Literally me let Matt Answer,
Then I'll make my point because it's important
what he answers on this. You know, anything
that this way can say. So Yeah. So
number 1, I just think establish exactly why
they would it. Number 2,
I just don't think it's a factual matter
It's actually in dispute that they have done
it, and they continue to do. Okay. Well,
I guess you already said it. So the
point was first that you're saying Already made
that clear, which is that they feel that
they can hide behind them to protect themselves.
Okay. So let's break it down.
He's aside asking what's the benefit. Right? Why
would they do that? Instead of going in
an area that's better protected, it's harder to
see but they actually have more accent? Okay.
And Matt Miller says because well, they think
they could hide behind them. So you tell
me what 8 months of them bombing civilians
shows him off they can hide behind them
today.
Oops logic.
Right. So if his real has been stating
publicly, but you know Asking can here that
we will bomb the civilians if they are
being held there, which is, you know, that's
the way they frame it. Being there or
bombing civilians for but any other reason, even
if they're not being held as human shields.
Then that makes the clear statement that they're
not worried about bombing the civilians. So Hamas
will go, okay. So this doesn't work anymore.
I can't hold them as you. The point
is they've never even proven that. Despite what
Matt Miller lies about right there. As Robert
has pointed out that Un their own investigation
before October seventh and just concluded they could
not verify it. It doesn't mean it didn't
happen. Always said this, I find it hard
to believe it hasn't.
But they have not apparently could not
verify israel's real claims.
And as we said, international organization said, it
was on israel to prove it they still
have not.
So we're coming back to his point. And
okay. So as they've made it clear relentlessly
that they will not be swayed by civilians
being present, we're gonna pretend that Hamas just
keeps doing it anyway. Just in case?
In fact, the point that the system seems
to draw as their fire when their civilians
present. In any case, that's just stupid. It
doesn't logically line up with what you're saying
and what they know. But I guess that's
the best you got. Just gotta fall back
to the same old talking points because that's
the only thing that they think is holding
this together. I argue that it's already been
blown apart. It's over. They've already lost.
In every sense of the word. Yeah. We
have seen
clear convincing evidence. Some of that evidence has
made public of them hiding in civilian targets
Oh, okay. You're you you already slipped in
there at the end. Clear convincing evidence, some
of which will be able to some, I
can't even do it as fast seated did.
Some of which will be made public.
Be made public. Not yet, though. Yeah. We're
gotta wait. Wait... They'll all on, and they
will make a up. You're a liar. And
as somebody out in the chat, the hague
is waiting for you, matt. I mean, it's
it's sad... And he's 1 of the most
vivid on this... I mean, because he's out
there every day.
Clear examples of comp complexity for genocide.
Blink Biden. I mean, it's crazy how long
it is. The bottom line is,
they're bombing these people, You know that and
you're gas sliding all of it to high
the fact that you know they're killing civilians.
The logic just doesn't apply.
Going back before October seventh and that has
continued to be 1 of their primary tactics
since October seventh. You know, I I tell
you what? And I should say, launching in
addition to hiding, launching
attacks. Launching order attacks and launching other attacks
from but inside
infrastructure. Launching these areas. I mean, they want
to launch a attacks where there's really military
is actually,
present and so on, not likely and and
then so that's where they could be bombed
Right. So what he's saying, which again, logic
that not gonna apply is that in many
of these cases, the Israeli arm army it
got the military is engaged in these locations
that have been there for a long time,
and they're simply bombing the place right next
to them. After they claim they've done, so
the end of the day,
there's no logic for them to be. They're
even after, like, we're talking about N or
or raf for that matter. Any number of
locations that they've already been through.
Occupied bombed everywhere to stabilize, blowing up all
the buildings. They leave and then come back
a week later and do it again.
It's just there's no way you can have
a brain
and look at all of this and come
away thinking that what they're saying makes sense.
It doesn't have to mean that it's the
opposite, I do think that's very clear and
pro.
But at the very least you have to
acknowledge that they're lying to you. From the
air and so on. I mean, you know,
this thing that we keep hearing about a
human shield and so on. I just want
to remind you that this is basically an
israeli thing. To the point where there's raised
Supreme Court told them you could not do
it. You could cannot use Palestinian kids as
humans you to wrap them around their jeep
and walk to the state and so on.
And in fact, they continue to do it.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured
used as shields by Israel per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9
year old as human shield
avoid jail.
Defense for children International, an international Human rights
Group. Israel forces use 5 Palestinian children as
human shields. That's 20 23.
So what possible... I mean, Israel has more
credibility whatsoever, to believe what they say that
there are hamas fighters are hiding there. Have
not seen any evidence. So Have not shown
as any So these people I just said
is Israel said to us. They're gonna release
the names. Militants attempts that they have killed.
If that's true if they do it, the
entire world will be able to see that
And Oh, if it's true. Great. I guess
we'll have the hope and see. Right? So
we'll just in the meantime, just pretend their
claims are accurate. Just believe them without any
evidence because they claim they'll eventually release the
data.
I mean, this is his... That's what he
just said. How is that possible? How is
that not them... Why don't they stand up
and running them out of the room? Are
you serious? We're supposed to accept that you're
just gonna blindly side with the people being
accused of Genes genocide because they claim. They'll
prove it later.
That's what he just said.
The idea that they're gonna release the names
of these people. I mean, that, right now,
they are like with Un. They're constructing. I'm
gonna argue probably so s put together live
that's gonna fall flat right after they say
it, but they are truck something that they're
gonna try to release it'll make these at
just like, every other thing they've done.
I bet you at false flat because they,
I get, I guess they're just that out
at this. But overall,
They have... If they had evidence that's shown
they were killing, they would have been waving
this around left and right.
The truth is they've been really desperately trying
to sell you the idea that they're just
all Hamas, and that just isn't working.
Judge, but I'm gonna wait until we see
what happens. Even good. I I forgot I
wanna point that out to too. If they
do it, the entire world will be able
to see that in judge, but I'm gonna
wait until we see what happens. That's my...
That's that's what I was saying a second
ago. So we're gonna wait and see
you're gonna a wait and see mode while
we're killed our children just got killed 14
in this last bombing, 15000 plus, but we'll
wait and see. Let's wait and see how
it plays out. Can you believe you just
said that?
Can I ask your couple more questions if
I may? You know, and
yesterday, there was the March
into Jerusalem all 3 and so.
And, you know, the the March just beat
the head.
A Palestinian journalists and so on. And you
know, Palestinian journal seem to be, you know,
at the tail end of recognizing whether in
Gaza or in the west bank consultant. Is
there any particular reason for that? So we
have seen the videos of this incident. Seen
the photos of this incident and we strongly
condemn them. Journalists and media workers are essential
to democracy, they should not be attacked anywhere
in the world, including in Israel,
for doing their jobs.
We expect Israel to uphold its stated commitment
to human rights and press freedom. We expect
them to protect journalists from these kinds of
assaults
And if there are violations of criminal law,
we expect people to be fully held accountable.
And do you expect Israel to, you know,
take what what you just said?
Seriously enough guys to light by that. I'm
gonna make clear what the United States expectations
are, but we have shown
repeatedly that we are willing to have, tough
conversations with israel real about the about these
matters. Oh, they're willing to have tough conversations
that is real completely ignores, but, no, they're
having tough conversations matt set. This
If that's the best they can do, I
feel really bad for them. And I I
genuinely hope they end up in prison. I
mean, here here's the sad reality about this.
We just talked about this,
here is... Oh, that... Well this was just
as exchange. I wanna include these as well.
Well, first, let me sense I make the
point Just said. We just talked about this
in the last show. That was the image
I used for the show. That's what he's
referring to. This is AAAA
member of,
oh, what was he again?
I forget. He's he's a journalist, but the
press
rest on. He's out there covering what's going
on in the West Bank. He gets attacked
mob by a bunch of Israeli settlers.
And here is another image of this. And
I think it's important to see how this
this got very serious guys. Look at these.
Look at what's going on.
And we're gonna pretend like, like the claims
they trying to make about jews on these
campuses, even though they're put on by Jewish
organizations and literally have holocaust survivors standing them
hand in hand, supporting they're lying to you.
And here is a real example of what
they're doing It israel without to anybody it
is against the including Orthodox jews by the
way.
But a journalist
And he can't even condemn that. He has
to white watch the whole thing and with
wishy washy. While we don't know sure. We
gotta find out. We'll have hard conversation with
Israel.
Sad disgusting pathetic.
As la
La C points out their faces. They're fa
they're fascist laughter.
The scrunch up looks a vicious racist thug.
And she interestingly compares it to an older
example, I'm not sure maybe this is, gonna
ring true, you know, maybe that's an event
that's public and famous. I don't know. But
it shows a black guy getting kind of
round up and beat by a bunch of
white guys.
And then she highlights this.
Oh, and that's just the the Image is
really subtle a youth raised into such an
evil death cult that real picture of them
engaged in racist mob, violence looks like Ai
rendering. It really does, especially this 1. Like,
if you see that? I mean, you would
be... Wait, is that real? It looks pretty...
Like, is that how is that impossible? Can
you that in any other context where would
be like the huge story in the world?
Imagine if this was a black guy in
the United States, and but any other number
of overlaps. This would have been everywhere in
the corporate media, but not this 1, and
you know why.
But I want to include these
Jason just put a good clip out here.
And then I'll I'll make you a point
about this. That it's important that
who was it? Somebody down here pointed out.
Give them a shout out for it. R
rj j Phoenix.
So first of all, great clip. It's it's
a a clip... Including in the human shield
dynamic that is a
6 minute clip that breaks down my compilation
of a whole lot more of the human
shield overlap. This happened most just since October
seventh. Real watching real life examples of them
marching them down the street with blind folds
on, shooting around them, It's crazy.
He writes. And then again, don't forget that
by the way that this is in... Are
there are now other people posting through the
Tl lab, the last American Va on main
account. But it says the longstanding standing and
troubling practice of the Id using human shields
extends decades very pro.
We have compiled numerous articles and videos doc
inventing this hyper critical act, demonstrating that it's
not solely hamas and engaged in such behavior.
Now, I feel like there's still a unfair
statement because I've always made the claim that
I find it hard to believe they haven't.
I think that's why he wrote that. But
I do kind of agree with what Rj
Phoenix was saying is that seems to imply
that there is evidence that,
you know, not only who else doing it,
but
at the Un wasn't able to prove that.
If currently they haven't shown any the evidence
of it, then we shouldn't be acting like
it's happening. It should just be possible.
But in either way, great clip, Jason do
an amazing job on these clips. Make sure
you share these, get these out.
And then all also include these
human were amnesty
articles that I've shown you since the beginning,
October twentieth. Damning evidence of war crimes is
rarely attacks white dot in hire families in
Gaza, proving that they've been ind bombing civilians
since the first couple of weeks or 75
years. And then, of course, the 1 from
November 8 horrifying cases of torture and degrading
treatment of palestinians. All by the way, being
backed up now even by corporate media, but
we've known about this since November, October even
before Just hopefully, people start to pay attention.
Now, this 1, I think is important. We
have 2 main more segments until we wrap
here.
And this is about the human aid... Had
a 3 and 8 conversation.
This apparently is their new spokesperson.
Rachel
reserves.
I guess just Rachel.
Look at that on on Twitter and all.
That's funny.
Israel is flooding, Gaza,
Elon Levi says,
flooding gaza with so much aid.
The Un is drowning under it.
This he's actually leaned into the comic thing.
I mean, I've been making fun of their
mo than they've ever seen that's actually what
they're doing. At a time when they've never
had less as children are starving as I
write to say this talk about it.
Israel is getting aid into Gaza, he says,
faster than the Un can distribute it.
Please follow our new citizen spokeswoman
who apparently only goes by Rachel.
Why is that?
Okay that's very telling. But any case, let's
watch what she had to say first, which
who knows if she just thinks she's on
the right side or even know going on
and just being used by the zion operation
to pair the things, but listen to what
she says and then I'll verify prove that
she's lying to you or that doesn't know
any better. And wants you to believe that
Israel is blocking aid from entering Gaza. That's
not true. The truth is Israel has flooded
Ga with so much aid. The Un is
drowning under it... Well, first point is that
if let's just pretend that you are getting
it inside the cream shop crossing, which is
what we can point to. It's been proven
by many people that you are holding it
there and not allowing them to reach it.
So that's the way they play these games.
No, we brought it in. They just can't
deal with it or you can't reach it
or you shoot at them when they try,
all been proven.
Israel is getting aid into gaza faster than
the un distributed it. Right now, as Speaking
to you, there is enough food sitting inside
the Gaza side of the board crossing to
fill 1000
trucks. Nobody is collecting it. The United? Do
you know how much that breaks down to?
2 days
of the bare minimum prior October seventh? 500
a day with fuel before October seventh, and
they were still food and insecure. That was
barely hang on before October seventh.
Now they're going a thousand been sitting there
for weeks. Okay. So if that's been more
than 3 days, you're still you're still behind.
They're just playing on the ignorance of the
average person.
And it's not working because people like us
exist and we're hound them on this conversation,
even if it's not the most popular conversation,
it's important to keep up on these things
because I believe it's important.
Bid nations needs to get its act together,
stop making excuses and come collect and distribute
the aid that is sitting in Gaza.
Yeah. And just get shot for it, and
then they'll pretend to your hamas and then
it'll all circle back around again. Look go,
you're not doing it.
I mean, this is the insulting part about
this. Many of them, but that every other
angle of this conversation, even parts of the
Us have made clear, like, I mean from
the executive branch even that they are blocking
aid, Biden has said this in some ways,
the Un, human Rights groups,
world food program, Ox, Uni staff, every single
angle of this has said, they are pro
blocking aid, and not to mention we can
watch them starving right now. It's unbelievably clear.
On top of that. They're
restrict. I mean, never the very first week,
Egypt
called them out. Said you're you're restricting the
aid. You bombed aid trucks. You bombed the
crossing.
And we're not... We can't remember that. We
act like that doesn't play in this conversation.
And now we're watching them, restrict the aid
that comes through, letting it rot when it
sits there. Settlers are coming in and dumping
the aid in the ground stomp on and
having rave and parties and that's not supposed
to factor into this. How does any play
in do? We're just giving them and they
can't get it.
You can't even talk about the pro examples
because they are desperate,
desperate. If just any 1 of those alone
shows you that it's not as simple as
we're bringing it. They won't take it.
Every 1 of those examples proves to you
that they're deliberately
officially because even the settlers have been guarded
by Id members.
Making this happen and then lying about it.
So not just starving them, but
starving them and then asking for credit and
praise.
The worst of the worst.
Okay. Let's talk about it.
Here is this clip?
This is being posted also by Israeli citizens
spokesperson. Apparently, they're making all these random new
accounts. How silly. Israel's flooding gaza with so
much aid.
Same thing. Elon levy just shared it himself,
and then lied about it because that's what
he does.
Well, oh, this was just the same point
we're making before. This is the legal of
the executive director for the legal center for
freedom of movement,
highlighting the same thing we all know.
C is literally dumping the goods on the
side of the I'm crossing, or any of
them for that matter,
which cannot be reached by israel... Without Israel's
coordination, and then they mock them for not
being able to reach it for lack of
coordination.
During a famine, they're making these manipulative jokes
or not really jokes when they're really doing
it.
Or they... As we've said, shoot at anybody
that they see as related to Un.
But then right now they're going, why isn't
un getting the food. This is how dumb
this is. They keep telling you that they're
all hamas. And if they're gonna shoot anybody
that's Us. And even the United States has
said, please stop shooting the security guards.
And then they just go, they won't even
do it. There's 1 of 2 things happening,
like, we're really... There's 3 things actually happen.
They are restricting their access to it They
are shooting them when they get close to
it, but there's also a dynamic of whether
they write not go close to it because
they know they're gonna get shot, but you
still have to realize all of that is
the deliberate creation of Israel in order to
make it look like it's their fault.
Even though everybody in the world knows their
fault. Now here are the overlaps from May
30 first going all the way up to
June fifth from from the United Nations.
Again, showing you that it's even gone down,
not the other way around. So the breakdown
here again is to show you that 500
trucks including full fuel were the average before
October seventh. And again, they were food insecure
at that time. So anything less than 500
a day going forward was guaranteed to pull
them closer to starvation. And that's why and
that getting daily average at the bottom.
They'd averaged
daily
9 food trucks in the sort of the
seventh of October the 30 first, 9.
Down from 500.
So they really kick started that famine, and
then the highest they got over the process
was 213
average a day in May. Won't really from
May first to the May sixth. That's it.
That's it. 02:13. So less than half of
what was needed to maintain that. So still
going to starvation. Now in May from the
seventh of the t.
As they're screening, they've dumped more on them
than they'd ever had before, the average 60
a day.
60.
Now let's go to all the way to
June fifth because this is what they're talking
about and see what it says now.
It's down to 46
from June first to June third.
91 in May overall.
91 for 500. And they're telling you that
they've done so much aid. They are flat
out lying to you guys. It's not just
because the Un says it's because of every
data point other than Israel says, is highlighting
that what I see as the truth, but
what we can clearly prove on the ground.
But either way, all of the data points
everywhere,
journalists.
Human rights groups, United Nations,
Even representatives of other governments, other aid workers,
doctors have said they are doing this and
Israel just goes, you're all racist, and that's
supposed to win the day.
It's pretty sad.
Now here's ox fam.
As they're claiming, they've dumped more aid here
than ever, and they're restricting it. They're saying
Israel's relentless bombardment and delete obstruction of humanitarian
response is making it virtually impossible.
For aid agencies to reach,
trapped starving civilians in Gaza.
If famine has declared, it's already too late,
they say.
Martin Griffith from the United Nations relief... He's
Un relief chief says, in Gaza, delivering aid
has become almost impossible.
We are nowhere near where we need to
be. So that's, again, that's about getting a
2 and then delivering it on top of
that. They are not letting this happen. It
says we need all border crossings open. Again,
there's not even all the crossings open, we
need safe and una unintended access. Before recently,
there was only 1. If actually none for
a while, They've occupied parts of the raf
crossing, which is illegal, everything they're doing. Everything.
Now here, here's some sad examples.
9 out of every 10 children in Gaza
is suffering from severe bound malnutrition.
Here's 1 of these horrible examples that are
really hard to look at.
And this is the 1 we just talked
about. This is from May 30 first. You,
and this is when the Us was fa.
According to their own people, Gaza aid reports
in order to hide the fact that they
were stopping aid. So not only do you
have the evidence of the side we've you
discussed, you got the Us government getting caught
lying about their own reports to hide the
real thing. It's just it's just so shockingly
obvious.
Here's the guardian from June fifth.
Starvation already causing many deaths and lasting harm
in Gaza.
Just keep lying israel, it's not gonna work.
This is from Ram abdul,
5 year old Hana rise from Gaza is
suffering from dehydration, malnutrition, liver and spleen enlargement
and diabetes. She cannot receive treatment due to
the destruction of Gaza hospitals by Israel only
patient of the raf crossing.
This this This is what's going on.
Look at this girl.
I just... There's no way to pretend this
is not happening.
And guys, this hasn't even gotten close to
what we were dealing with in Yemen.
It's gonna get worse. I guarantee it if
we allow this to continue.
And Abby Martin simply highlights
what cost to to fails tweet that says
this is nothing short of horrific. The same
article, which by the way, they just, you
know, remove the image. Right you can see
you know, Twitter totally not playing along. Starvation
is already causing mass, death in Gaza.
2 you organizations say more than 1000000 people
are expected to face death by starvation.
1000000
people.
And as she writes, the world is watching
millions and Gaza starved the death, and our
leaders are still rationalizing this as necessary and
justified. That is really the worst part I've
said for the beginning. Not just that they're
letting it happen, but they're calling it a
good thing. They're saying this is freedom. This
is democracy. This is defending yourself.
This is gonna change...
You know, either, I think the positive rev
reverberation of the fighting back is gonna change
things in positive ways. But just them pushing
this for so long is going to change
a lot of bad things in the wrong
direction too for a long time.
I worry about that.
They're just rattling off some lies to finish
up here. Right? Here's what we keep saying.
Have aviv accomplished. And same thing as just
stating a bunch of text on Twitter, and
then saying, see,
can't you distinguish being the truth because I
lie and then there's all this evidence.
This is what they keep doing.
Eva Writes on the fifth
isn't a surprise to nobody, the Id idea
located a rocket launcher concealed by a structure
with the Un half logo.
Was that even prove in the first place?
If it's even real
that there's a piece of whatever with the
units theft load on it that could have
been used? I mean, these people will show
you anything?
Because that's because the strategy of gaza terrorists,
abuse all humanitarian facilities then scream war crimes,
or it's not even real or that's a
fake image or it's something you put there.
I mean, this is exactly what they do.
I mean, it certainly could be the case.
My point is for how many times they've
lied. It's just impossible not see that they
are constantly putting out their un verifiable evidence
free claims.
And this person down here highlights what she
also tweeted about the... There is a list
She says just like the hamas guard list
in the hospital, what she also tweeted about
and says, found in the basement of this
children's hospital, a schedule showing the names of
terrorist.
Except that wasn't the truth, which is why
she deleted it because it was actually just
a calendar, but the days of the week
on it. That's it. Anybody spoke speaking Arabic
saw that right away.
And you think she didn't know that. She
just lied because that's what her job is.
Just like we're talking about here. Or you
get these examples. Embassy of the United States
or is relative of the Us says, Am
lost tunnel shaft, built under a little girl's
room in Raf? Well, how do we know
it's Raf? How do Know it's a little
girl's room? How do I know it's actually
a tunnel? That's something you just did 30
seconds ago because we don't. Because they just
keep stating things with red circles and whatever
else is saying truth.
They don't care to prove any even it
because usually that applies that they know they're
not telling the truth. And as this person
posts the same thing. Wi saying they lie
about everything.
Or and elon levi doing the same thing
because they used to get the same talking
points, give it the same day, and they
all say the same thing. Sometimes monsters hide
to the bed. Oh, you're so clever.
I just don't know why we think we
can prove any of this.
And here's 1 that you might have seen
as well. Israel's main account saying, some of
you might sit store some clothes or toys
under your beds. In Raf, Old Raf, of
course, because nothing else matters when they want
you to fix fixated on what they're currently
murdering. Right? Currently bought me to death, currently
ethnically cleansing.
So apparently, because they show some metal things
under are a bed that we don't even
know it's in raf. That means you can
kill children. Right?
Even if those were rockets, it still does
not make what they're doing legal.
But it says in in Us, or in
Raf, ham off stores weapons that are children's
bed. They've already played this game. They've already
been caught lying about 1 of them. So
I don't know why we would pretend that
these are true.
But here's a clip. Oh, Didn't grab this
actually.
Of this person highlighting in 19 48 Israeli
Militias.
Surprise surprise, we're hiding weapons in schools, hospitals,
religious buildings. By the way, it's what they
do now. Guys, they keep getting caught doing
that right now in Gaza or that they've
done that a long time. Thou chief a
hospital, the tunnels they built were why the
hospital being used,
even brock a former prime minister
I Rock admitted that on an interview with
cnn.
So it's just it's like it's like ignoring
their human shield practice while claiming the other
side's using human shields.
Certainly possible they're doing it too, but you're
ignoring what you're doing.
Ever seen these signs that are dotted literally
all around Israel that say the early zion
militia groups used schools, hospitals and religious buildings
to hide weapons and train militia groups. There
is a list
Though for a bit of context, this alleged
use of civilian infrastructure by hamas for military
functions has been a very controversial issue throughout
this war. With such claims being used to
justify Israel's deadly and ind criminal bombing on
Gaza. But zion paramilitary groups actually used civilian
infrastructure for military purposes
prior to the establishment of the state of
Israel, and over 70 years later, they're not
hiding it. And it seems they're still proud
of it because they're signs and plaques dotted
all around some Israeli communities. A bit like
this secret arms cache or hidden weapon storage
in the basement and attic of this synagogue
which the tel aviv municipality still conveniently commemorate
with this sign in both Hebrew and English,
And the B school building in Britannia, which
has a sign reading training by various underground
movements took place in the school. A cave
in the school was used as a hiding
place for weapons.
Another school in tel aviv doubled as a
training center in light weapons and as another
arms cache for the H garnered Zion militia
And then you've got this building which also
has a hospital comme Zion militia groups using
the building as their headquarters with this sign.
And that Zion militia group was the Et
soul also known as the Erdogan, known for
carrying out multiple massacres of Palestinians in 19
48.
Also designated a terrorist group, also, whose logo
included Jordan as part of Israel, and sign
outside this synagogue in a neighborhood in Tel
aviv, which says under the stairs leading to
the women's section was a secret arms cache
for illegal weapons of the H ghana during
the British rule. And you've also got this
sign outside the Reading power station in Tel
aviv which housed the technical office of the
to, the military industry founded by the H.
1 of many underground arms facilities, which use
the machines and equipment of the building they
hid in to manufacture weapons. And then you've
got both the gym for the Ba 4
high school and the I had High school
for boys in Tel aviv, which were both
used as training sites for the H ghana,
and both also housed secret arms caches. So
this list goes on and on, but here's
some things to keep in mind as Israel
accuses Ham hamas of the same things that
it once did. These militia groups were deemed
as... That it still does, which is verifiable.
Terrorist
organizations, which killed Palestinians in order to establish
the state of israel in 19 48. And
those same pre state army groups went on
to form the Israeli Defense force also known
as the Id.
Very easy to prove.
I mean, these things are undeniable. I mean,
this is the crazy reality of this. It's
like the thing that Robert just highlighted in
his article about Bill Maher lying about all
these things. That, you know, he called the
the women's freedom discussion. Right? Where they talk
about the... I mean, the point they always
make and this is they get the heat
job law and everything else. That... There's is
no hi job law in in in Gaza.
The reality is that it's... There is conservative
religious areas... Well that feel that's the way
it's supposed to be done, but there's no
laws in place except in Israel. There are
a very clear pressure from Orthodox Jews and
women to hide their hair from their family.
So it's it's just this overlap lie about
everything.
Now here's another ending point that what we've
already highlighted before, Han Tall just decided to
post this lie again. You've seen this more
than once. Upping This was posted on June
fourth.
Remember this, the fake teeth, the dentist called
out. He just used it again.
I don't even know what's supposed to be
in. It's like a bunch of Pete like
driftwood rock, but he goes, that the remains
of murdered Jewish children from K kombucha.
Do he realized how stupid this is while
we know that there were only many children
that were there and none of them... I
mean, this has been debunked by her.
Not not... Mean, the the simple reality of
how many got killed, but then also the
idea that they're highlighting the teeth. So That's
what they claimed these words. You know how
I know that?
Because here is Elon Levi saying this on
October 30 first. These are the murdered israeli
children of Cabo kombucha air. That's why they
keep pushing the lie that's already been debunked.
They were tortured dis dismembered and then burned
to death. All of which were relies.
Even even their own people have admitted this
now.
Archaeologists are sift to the rebel to find
their teeth,
archaeologists,
he got made fun of like crazy for
that
archaeologist, what a Moron. The bottom line is
this was not true. And I even highlighted
the time,
On the 30 first, I said, where have
I seen that before. Remember this story?
The fake story from Ukraine where they did
the same thing that were proven in the
story to be a fake story.
It's pathetic.
But here is Pb t saying these teeth
the ones that do not belong to children.
Why? Because a dentist chimed in and said
which by the way it's been I this
I checked this myself. Those are not children's
teeth. In fact, those aren't even teeth. That's
that is actually bridge and porcelain crown. Kids
are not given both. Children teeth are large
and in width with very small roots. These
are fake adult teeth.
Burnt teeth don't look like that by the
way. Oops.
Now what's interesting about that is that original
tweet that got a lot of attention.
Guess what? The account now gone. What a
surprise. Twitter playing its role. Right? But don't
worry because other people have chimed in, and
this person simply says, finally I get to
use my death agree to be debunk Zion
his lies, going back to the same point.
But it's easy to prove, guys, This was
broken down. He he was publicly embarrassed by
the story. But now the Not gonna Tall
just goes... Let's play this 1 today. Let's
see what they say about it that just
pushing the same line. Now, of course, removing
all the other parts of it that we
know for an absolute factor lies,
torture, dis dismembered, burned to death, specific lies
that have been shown to Na to have
happened.
They don't care. Just gotta keep pushing the
same lives. And the worst part is it
using examples of things that we know for
a fact aren't even real. Probably why it's
a little bit fuzzy so it's harder to
tell. Now it's the crowns that a fake
teeth, none of them are for children.
But that's what he says.
That's how ridiculous this is.
Oh, and I I discuss it in this
show back from 12/27/2023,
if you wanna watch it.
Here's an interesting post from my ic cj
saying British born israeli ex government official accused
of international law violations. Criminal complaint issued a
Scott Scotland Yard war crime unit.
What's interesting is they fail to mention who
it is, but I think we can guess.
Right? Who is the only is
British born ex government official? Well, you know
who that is. This person says, riddle this.
Who's got a rope dungeon for a brain,
ears of a goblin and a mouth of
gobble gobble.
This guy.
This is what we're talking about. So
actually great to hear that this guy is
being officially investigated at least in Scotland by
Scotland Yard, for war crimes. Why? Because he's
a war criminal, guys, that's the truth, and
they are finally going after these people?
And George Gallo highlights a couple of points
on this that Tommy Robinson apparently is funded
by the Israel lobby, which shouldn't surprise anybody
he's guy gets pulled right back into the
conversation right before this or right when it
starts. I mean,
very interesting how all this is going.
Now, on the note of information that is
incorrect.
I thought I was important to highlight that.
And, I, honestly, Am I'm not seeing any
much from 1 side of this or the
other than the Israeli constant lives about this,
but this is 1 that I saw in,
that I was important to point out. So
solomon ahmed med, which who knows if it's
intentional or not. Highlights this and says death
to arabs, Mayor Village Burn, Mohammed is dead,
a Jew a... J is a soul and
Arab as a son of a horror kind
of a thing. That's what they're all... They
claiming that they're all saying in this massive
protest.
Now, apparently, and This is 1 other
Israelis. And this 1 is from Elon Rocky
who was
constantly criticizing Israel.
He says that's not what they're actually saying
here? He says, we hate it when Israel
to stuart Arabic. There's no need to do
it to Hebrew. And this person says, what
are they saying and saying some passages from
Psalms. So what's important here. And I... It
could just be because he... Somebody shared that
to him and he thought that what they
said. I mean, I don't know Hebrew. I
don't... The point is that it's easy in
this time frame to
trust somebody and do it, which is why
I'm constantly saying that we have to be...
Even people could trust, question everything.
Either way, the point is that it's happening
everywhere. Just be careful even people that you're
watching they're saying the things that we agree
with, realize that they could be accidentally doing
it, or could be deliberate? I don't know.
But just be careful. So because there's a
lot of people... There's a lot of information
flying around that is not accurate.
Now to end, Lens highlights, Spain has now
become the second European country to join South
Africa
in the genocide case against Israel. It's a
big deal. The first was... Was a it
was Ireland. Now it's Spain, it's only gonna
keep going.
Ti highlights that the, after the Maldives
basically revoked passports set for
Israelis going to their country,
which apparently they have a pretty high tourism
rate from israel. The Uk
says gives military and political support to countless
war crimes, which they have
as long history of war crimes,
invaded hundred and 71 of a hundred and
93 countries. Telegraph,
silence.
Maldives.
No israeli can enter sense they're all war
criminals. Telegraph,
the maldives has tempe
politics.
Meaning basically, what was it again? Like,
characterized by strong turbulent conflict conflicting emotion. Like
Searching point is, and that's what they say
right there.
Hard line is islamic state with tempe politics.
Like how ridiculous. You can sit there and
stare at your government that's constantly many workarounds
crimes, but they act stand up on the
right side of things and you call them
a problem. That's how bad we are right
now. Like you're just in the society we're
in. But here is an important reality of
Colombian president. Now when they agree with them
or not. It's a huge statement.
He literally says, Nazis are back in power,
and they are taking their revenge.
Colombian president says, Gaza is their laboratory, but
they won't stop until they make all of
humanity into an enslaved robot. Now, you could
argue as being
ballot coast or or, you know, hyper.
But as we said before, there's far more
interesting overlap than we realized to the Zion
organization and Nazis. Even the Us government preparation
paper lip and so on. So maybe there
is more to it. Maybe he's just making
that claim because they embody what Nazis were
up to you decide. Either way, a big
statement to make. Lot of countries are shifting
dynamics here. Now Israel activist in Israel have
now occupy the German embassy in Tel aviv.
They're holding up signs to say don't you
have enough blood on your hands? Never again
is never again for anyone.
But they're dragging them out because even Jews
gonna attack in israel if they don't align
with zion ism, which is the real point
we're making all the time. That zion is
is what this is about.
But what we're trying to show on top
of that is even in Israel.
Everywhere in the world, this is falling apart
for the Zion government. Here somebody in the
United States, a Us air force air enforcement
is that what you say or Air force
member,
it says my name is Juan
Bet Bet in Court.
And the member the Us air force currently
seeking separation from the military as a conscientious
object.
My strong moral objection to the genocide and
Gaza has brought me to this juncture where
I must speak out despite their appraisal it
may bring. Good for him. Whether you agree
with them or not, you know that takes
courage. And the bottom line is, every which
way you look. This is coming down on
the Us on israel and anybody that is
part of the people committing Genocide or allowing
it or turning a blind eye to it.
Muhammad she had to highlight the French lawmaker,
highlights the participation of 4185
French citizens and Rolls assault on Gaza. 4000
French citizens, like let's pretend like this isn't
much bigger than we realized.
Calls for their criminal prosecution if they took
part in war crimes.
Ukrainian, Italian, German, Us, and French mercenaries are
reportedly serving in the Ae in Gaza. That
should not be okay with anybody.
And this is what's happening. And he also
highlights
the South Africa has now become the first
aid to threaten consequences
for citizens serving in the Id, while they
in in... While the entire
Civilized West is condo containing its citizens taking
part in the
of serious crimes against humanity.
What the Experts call a genocide in the
making.
Caitlin Johnston stone ends with nobody really supports
Israel.
They just support their own Dope political factions
their own dope religious beliefs, their own
continued campaign donations from these israeli lobby.
Everything about israel is fake. Right down to
its network of public support, which we just
highlighted.
Fake social media campaigns, influence politicians, fake politician
campaigns, influence politician,
all happening in front of you.
Final point, the Ti to end with the
paradox he says of the Us and Israel.
Now this should be self evident.
But I like the way he frames it.
The paradox of the Us and israel generally
is that they kill
everyone in the way who has the audacity
to demand justice or equity or human rights,
then continue pretending that they care about justice
and equity and human rights.
As their entire existence depends on this lie.
Simple. Right? But I think it's important because
it's just about the most obvious thing in
the world right now. And I'm really hoping
we can start paying attention more and more
to this. It's important, guys.
I know you know that. I know that's
why you're here.
So thank you for continuing to support this
platform
because we are under attack like never before,
but we're not gonna stop. It's important.
As I've said many times, I'm beginning to
sense that there will be repercussions for me
doing this for the rest of my life,
and I'm accepting that because this is 1
of the most important things I've ever been
involved with in my entire life, whether it's
Tea lab in general or just this topic
we're dealing with now.
I think this is the kind of thing
It goes back to the larger the the
overlap that people made during Covid and they're
also making during this discussion.
If you wondered what you did would have
done during World 2, you now know. And
it applied during the Covid 19 part, but
way more clearly around the Israel gaza conversation.
You know who you would have been then,
like what you're doing now.
And I believe most people can see that
at this point and they are mostly choosing
the right side.
I mean, obviously, my opinion, but I think
it's pretty objectively what the the right side
is the side of not committing genocide. I
think it's very clear. And I'm just happy
to see the people are continuing to highlight
this. But
the consequences
from just like with Covid 19,
even though we clearly turned out to be
correct and people are still fired, people still
lost their jobs
military personnel. I think it's important to see
that those consequences are being put down almost
out of spite, whether it's from the Israeli
propaganda side or your own government in the
same interest.
I just want you guys to think about
that that there will be consequences in some
cases, but do you think it's important enough
to accept that?
To fight it and hopes that you can
circumvent it, but just owning the fact that
this is important enough to risk that. It's
like it's like an wartime situation. That if
you believe you're over there fighting, you... Risking
your life to fight for these things. It's
obviously not a lethal discussion for where we're
sitting,
Obviously, could eventually get to that point. But
my point is that it's important to weigh
those consequences
and realize that things in life can be
important enough to risk losing.
Because you believe in them. And I think
that's what most people are coming to terms
with around this is that we need to
start recognizing
that it's not about being comfortable
and having all the trapping of what we
call Western society. It's about recognizing that there's
a hell of a lot of people in
the world that haven't even been offered the
opportunity to achieve those things because of your
government. And that's no way to talk about
some collect mindset that have a response ability
as the people to to make sure everybody
else is the same. It's simply just to
acknowledge that your government has held them in
a position that they don't wanna be in.
For the interest of your government, not even
for you.
It's just time to own that and try
to work away from that and fight for
the people that have always been held in
a position of starvation. Of of
deprivation of a attacks of...
I mean, god, everything we could talk about,
All the horrible things they're doing right in
front of us.
Day, after day, after day, talked about yemen,
the African continent in general, even well before
the United States, Britain and so on. This
is something we're trying to fight away from.
I believe we have an opening here. And
I know you see it as well. So
thank you for that support and continuing to
highlight this information. I love you all.
As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusion,
stay vigilant. But no, let's look at the
hamas charter.
How much charter was written by maybe half
a dozen people
in 19 88
at a time at a moment of an
stream is israeli attack on ga. It has
no status.
They've repeated over and over again that it
doesn't apply anymore. And if you're interested in
charters, why keep to that,
take the governing party in Israel, could.
It
it grew it grew out of Beirut root.
That's its
ideological center, Pagans Beirut, Netanyahu Beirut.
Its position never change
is that
the land of Israel
that the entire land of Israel
belongs to the Jews.
That includes today's jordan.
Okay?
In fact, the old slogan was both sides
of the Jordan.
That's ours and this is too...
They've never changed that
so that's their charter. To anybody pay attention
to
then came the January election and Israel intensified
its attack with Us support.
After that, there are repeated
attacks,
Israeli attacks and cease ceasefire agreements.
Every Cease ceasefire agreement is approximately like what
I've read.
What happens is Israel
completely dismiss in disregard it can maintains the
siege and violation of the spire
increases the violence,
Ham hamas lives up to it and Israel
officially accepts that
until agrees to that
until some
escalation of Israeli violence
leads to a Hamas reaction, and then another
episode of mowing the law.
That's been going on since November 2005.
How hamas is not a nice organization they
do a lot of rotten things.
That's for the Palestinian inn to worry about,
but it has nothing to do with us.
If we were supporting come off, nothing 0
If we were supporting C,
it would be our problem, but we're not.
And what they do is for palestinians to
deal with what we deal with is what
we are doing, which is supporting
massive criminal
operations all over the region, locking peace
that's for us to be concerned about.