Faith in quick test leads to epidemic that
wasn't in 01/22/2007.
Nearly everyone involved thought the medical Center had
had a whoop cough outbreak. Nearly 1000
healthcare workers in in New Hampshire were given
a test
Results were in a hundred and 42 people,
including the doctor herself, were told that they
appeared to have Whoop cough. Thousands were given
antibiotics, a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were
taken out of commission, including some of the
intensive care. Sound familiar. The whole thing was
a false alarm. Not a single case of
Whoop cough was confirmed.
With the definitive test. They placed too much
faith
in a quick, highly sensitive molecular test that
led them astra
At dartmouth, the decision was to was to
use a test Pcr
even with the acronym because it was so
early for poly
chain reaction. And it led to the epidemic
that wasn't.
Welcome to the deal we wrap up. A
concise show dedicated to bringing you the most
relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
We
Thursday, 01/06/2024.
Thank you for joining me today. A lot
of different things to cover. We're gonna be
focusing on the Covid 19 development
into today, which I've been keeping an eye
on as I've been telling you guys over
the last so many months and even before,
obviously, during the peak
but I've been very hesitant to to talk
about every little blip on the radar just
because I was worried, and I still am
that we might be in in a way
doing their job of prop
the topic for them. So I've been very
careful on what I would focus on. But
today, I saw a few things over the
last week really that I wanted to make
sure we kind of highlighted
not necessarily to bring that bell yet and
say that this thing is back, but really
just recognize
the
the precursor that we've typically seen and it's
there, or should that decide to be executed.
I wanna also focus on a 1 part
of the kind of... We've been here and
there highlighting the bird flu hype, H5N1
and the interesting overlap, the conversation of the
injection, and the new ones coming forward where
they're already working on mrna overlaps, But I
wanted to highlight a couple of interesting,
points around the person that they're pointing to
you in the recent Mexico case, as well
as just
I mean, I, actually, a little bit of
a point about the the injection that Finland
is apparently gonna start allowing to be taken
by certain groups.
Which is very interesting to me. Because as
much as the
the way we're supposed to think about vaccination
is sort of a prop. It's not always
the way these things are designed or work.
And in this context, like, a good example
would be that you don't just go out
and get your routinely ebola vaccine.
You know, it's first... It's for certain time
frames and even then,
not to even get into whether I think
any of these things are appropriate with the
intent and the the field behind all of
this work, but interestingly seeing this come out
now, and I'll go into why I think
that's not necessary and, and the 1 that
we're gonna... They're they're talking about.
I don't wanna try to remember the name
off the top of my head. I'll point
out when we get there,
is
rife with all of the same problems we've
seen before. And I'll make that exact point
for why all of those potential risks
should only be necessary in the
situation where you're actually in danger,
and that's not what's happening right now. Not
even what the cases they're pointing to they
themselves, we'll tell you just like with the
Covid variant conversation that it's less dangerous,
spreads faster, like, in very rare low risk.
And all... And that's assuming it's even actually
there, which is we're gonna talk about today.
It's alarming to see that these things have
not dissipate.
Even among certain circles that called these things
out, it's very interesting point Now I'm gonna
talk about in a future show.
My concern about using mrna or even I
rna.
Solutions for the same kind of problems. Now
it's not to say that I... That those
might not have some kind of positive effect
like anything we could talk about. I just...
Am
like most people.
I had a huge block and... Just... I'm
very, very, very concerned. Skeptical about anything in
that direction at this point even from people
that were on the right side of that
conversation. So that's something we're gonna talk about.
I wanna kinda plant that seed because I'm
worried about all of the way this goes,
but we're also gonna talk about
interesting developments in regard to israel
and Gaza and Lebanon that Robert recently covered.
Over the last couple of days, there's been
a lot of
surge in that conversation, and it's been ongoing
for quite a long time. If you could
follow this platform. You've seen Robert's coverage of
this.
Extensively going back years.
And just since October seventh even there been
highlighting the different back and forth, we covered
the a a Reuters journalist was killed in
Lebanon within... I think it was the thirteenth
of October,
actually broke that story about a week and
a half before even Reuters has admitted that,
not because it wasn't self evident
verifiable, but because they were dragging their feet,
like we're still seeing around even when their
own journalists is killed by Israel,
or we're gonna talk about that in from
that in... Important discussion we're gonna talk about
a great breakdown from Robert about Bill Maher
recent... Are not recent, but you know, recent
the sense of over the last less than...
Over the last year, I think before October
seventh at them correctly, in any case, about
Palestine,
and just really importantly breaking down because the
recent the clip went viral, the lies.
I mean, flat out... I mean, find it
hard to believe he doesn't know somebody's these
are lies, but in any case, we'll go
through and break those down for you. And,
you know, and I'll probably leave it there
because there's a lot that I have lined
up that We'll try to get to. There's
time, But I was gonna plan on discussing
the recent attack on the school, which as
horrifying as it actually is, that's not even
that new of it's happened as more time...
I've lost count of how many times israel's
israel is bombed
un schools and kill children. It's a very
important story. Unfortunately, it's something they've continued to
do, and so my point is that there
are other stories that I think are in
the lineup should be discussed first. Even saying
that makes me feel gross because we're talking
about such important things. I guess the real
point in there is that it's unfortunate. It's
sad. It's disgusting that we're in time where
people
proposed... You know, presenting themselves as fighting for
the right thing, the honorable thing, all all
morality,
law are the ones mostly ignoring
or gas lighting, hiding stories like that. But
we will talk about that as well. And
there is a couple of things we'll get
to, but we'll leave it there. I think
Oh, and that 1 of the things in
the title that I will get you for
sure, which IIII put it reportedly on purpose
because it's interesting.
Israeli Media is reporting that the Un has
put Israel on a blacklist or rather they
got a notified of it before
it's about to be announced apparently today or
tomorrow, at least that's what they're reporting. And
the only reason I would not and just
report that as what Israel's reporting is because
of how much we've seen Israel,
just in general, and the media even around
that, not all of it, lie.
Un,
just without just no issue at all. So
it's important to see that they're reporting it,
and it... And the the other point is
the reason I think it's worthy of reporting
is because it's very... The reasoning behind it.
Because they're killing children is what the article
discusses is self evident. It's obviously happening. So
it's an interesting point to cover and a
lot of other bombing and murder and horrible
things will get to that I think are
important for you to see even though it
is hard to continue to look at.
I will start with 1 update that I
think is important,
more of a correction, but it's sort of
a different... It is... It is a correction
based on what recently said, but at the
way this went down was not necessarily a
mistake in the context of even
the... I forget to actually first reported this,
it was in fact reported from the journalist
who covered the story, speaking directly with Scott
Ritter, which is why everybody thought it was
sound.
Incorrectly, I guess, which I find hard to
believe
reported that judge
Was also taken off this airplane. Now it
turns out he wasn't. He himself
tweeted this out underneath the conversation directly from
Sp saying he was taken that it says,
quote, I was neither on the plane nor
at the airport when this incident occurred, Scott's,
Scott Ritter free speech and travel rights were
profoundly violated because that that was real what
happened to him. If you don't remember, you
got taken off flight on the way in
New York. Flying to Saint.
Saint. Petersburg
and detained on, I mean, it's a political.
I mean, this might as well be israel
at this point. This is what we're talking
about. And it's it's very alarming to see
this happen.
Judge Napoleon was reported to have been taken
alongside him, apparently,
Napoleon speaking about this said that Ritter,
was misunderstood, I guess by the journalists journalist
who reported that, very, very strange. In any
case, make sure we corrected that and so
you know that apparently he did was not.
So despite the reports, he was not on
the same plane nor taking. So it's important
to make sure we correct that.
Now I... I wanna start with some important...
Covid 19 conversation and Bird flu. Interestingly, first
and foremost, we just... I wanted to highlight
a great interview I had with Derek Bros,
Around the summit of the future. And as
I titled it the shell game of authoritarian
control,
which he talks about the libertarian convention, we
we talk about his coverage of the best
named Christian services, which is part 2 is
about to come out, possibly, most likely it's
tomorrow morning.
But we talked... We highlighted it we had
a really good conversation about this very alarming
thing called the summit of the future. And
just to break it down quickly. I highly
recommend you watch the entire interview.
Derek makes excellent points. And for in the
article as well, that's it that's sourced... It's
so, oh,
looks like I forgot to put the links
in there. Also do that when we get
done. Some... I've guess I forgot. Anyway, that
will be in there shortly after this, but
the point is that his article
discussing this goes over the alarming point that
the summit of the future, which is a...
I great, you know, very much the great
reset world economic forum, all all that very
same direction. So as you can see, sustainable
development goals, you know united nations, the whole
thing.
And this is about sort of a more
broad
kind of pay conversation
about
all of the stuff we're worried about.
I mean, again, to make it quick. The
point is that the
pandemic accord, the treaty that conversation at least
has being presented to stalled. Doesn't mean it
went away. And I even remote... In fact
it seems to be continuing, but it's very
much presented as sort of stalled, the can't,
which we both rightly still harold it as
a positive thing.
My worry and Derek worry is that this
is sort of a
concept, you know, as usual, get you looking
over here, but you think this has stopped,
and then this kind of subtle 1 comes
into the side. My... The point is the
sum of the future seems to have all
the trapping of all the same stuff. In
a very broad,
seemingly can still be applied to
undermine sovereignty. And so my worry was that
this was sort of a...
Not what's the right word for it, a
base switch. Where we look over here, they
think we think this is stopped and then
this thing comes through. And if we see
it, we go, oh, well, it's less dangerous.
So the kind of thing gets you to
accept something that doesn't seem as bad and
when the plan was the always is what
they wanna do to accept. Or maybe we're
just not even supposed to see it. In
maybe we're wrong. But the point is looking
it for yourself. I see it in there,
and it worries me. It worries me that
this is the way it's supposed to go
and this is going to... Cement the same
problem while we're looking in the wrong direction.
That's always something we should consider. And on
the interesting note,
I... I've been talking about a lot of
pretty... I mean I always been talking about
contentious stuff,
contentious even for the 2 party paradigm, which
is important to think about.
And I you lately haven't gotten a lot
of censorship on Youtube. But I don't even
talk about anymore. Because it seems to happen
damn near every time. But over the last
couple of months, it's weirdly stopped.
I get him here and there, but not
a lot, which is like a... Not like
I used to get.
Which was basically every show we would do.
But all of a sudden, the 1 that
Youtube decides to censor, the sum of the
future, the Shell game with the control that
kind of tends to tell me something. Maybe
it should because they noticed. I don't know.
Interesting. Nonetheless, On that note, by the way,
if you wanna participate in our pirate stream
pirate channel community.
Give me an email, Ryan last american va
bond dot com, pirate channel in the subject.
I think I say it different every time.
Something pirate. So I can find it in
my
endless black hole of emails that end up
in Spam even if this the right good
ones.
If you wanna take part because I need
new pirate channels because they are censoring them,
But I thought that was interesting. So on
that note, let's talk about the Covid 19
direction, which I think is acutely aligned, you,
is a huge part of the
great reset direction and the pit... The
this the summit of the future and specifically
the pandemic accord conversation. It doesn't have to
just be about medical freedom. But I think
that's obviously the central part of the way
that they kinda put this together.
So Like I said before,
I'm not trying to say that I think
this is all coming back right now, but
we can see very clearly that this could
be the same conversation. If they wanted this
to go the same way. With the same
stuff and actually now say that right out
of the gate,
the point being that this is
think this is a an illusion that does
not require...
Facts does not require
actual virus or actual sickness or you, whatever
you think about those things. And that point
is not debatable.
Danny Ran court with this amazing research on
this, the data itself that he breaks down
in this study proves that Covid 19 is
an illusion. Now you doesn't have to mean
it's not there, what it means is that
he proved with the data that you could
present exactly the same way using Pcr false
positives, using the completion of fluid pneumonia, using
the vaccine side effects that came afterward and
can, you know, frame all of this, you
could have presented the same thing.
Statistically speaking, you could have done that. So
I think that's Clearly what did happen, the
question is, was it entirely as if nothing
was there or was it just using a...
Which we'll point out again in a minute
with P reviewed science, a think that was
less than the flu from the very beginning,
at least as the scientific study found,
and then bolstering it with fake information. So
keeping that in mind, just knowing how easy
it would be to just pipe this kind
of information, a great clip from Canvas, just
highlighting that in
Victoria.
In in Melbourne in in Australia, they're now
pointing to. And this was 4 days ago,
another
surge, at least what they're calling it, which
by the way, that could mean, like, 2
percent more than it was yesterday. I, surge.
And the same thing by the way, they're
gonna do with the ambulance in here. The
same thing we saw during the entire Covid
19 illusion, those ambulance ambulances overwhelmed, The hospitals
are overwhelmed, then you look into it even
barely and you realize that, well, that area
might be a little bit over the top.
But over a a year, completely nothing. And
this hospital is totally empty. It was a
game constantly. What do these people even knew
that. So keep that in mind, that's the
same thing happening here. You... They... An increase
here or there, and we don't get to
find out whether it's fluid itself, Covid 19,
if that's even really what's happening or if
it's just symptoms to Pcr test and people
testing more,
Keeping all that in mind, here's the clip
we just played about how this is at
least starting to come back.
Right. Said respiratory illnesses is including flu and
Covid 19, cases are putting Victorian ambulance services
under increasing pressure.
Right. So right over of the gate ask
yourself well, what's the breakdown is it? All
all flu with a few Covid? Is it
all Covid fuel flu? Is it 50 50?
And he does not make a difference for
the conversation It should. Let's cross our reporter,
Christie Mayer in Melbourne morning to chris. Or
none?
Now flu cases have increased by 65 percent
in the last fortnight night alone.
Good morning. Sell that's winter is only just
arrived, but already flu is up 65 percent
right across Victoria, and it isn't just the
flu Covid is on the rise again as
well. Cape just the way that they frame
that, It sounds to me like it's... My
point, the reason I said in the first
place is 65 percent increase doesn't tell you
what the percentage breakdown is of what's getting
reported.
You know, you can have a 50 90
percent increase in flu, but have 70 percent
of the cases or vice first. The point
is I think that's a flu being reported,
which could just be damned or anything.
And then
some Covid on there as well may just
frame it as Covid flu because it's about
hype. These people have built an industry around
hype. Especially in the medical field. This is
of that have doubled in recent weeks. There
are currently 361
people in hospital with Covid, and around 2
dozen of those are in the Icu. It's...
Okay. So if they're in with Covid, what
does that mean again? Plus just brush. Back
up on our information. Right? That means a
Pcr test. That means in some cases still
to this day, a ci substantial thing. Where
you have the right kind of circumstances with
the right symptoms and we just deem that
a Covid case. These things all still exist.
The point is in this case, those things
aren't definitive, not even remotely and they still
use them. And that doesn't mean that they're
doing this intentionally. It could be that's what
we'll make the point again in a second
about the pant the epidemic it wasn't, just
making the mistakes because the wrong tools have
been putting your hands or people at some
higher level are doing this on purpose for
their own interest. Doesn't mean the person reporting
this know the doctor cake in the test,
but it means it's very easy to lie
about this, as well always consider that maybe
it just is something happening. But the point
is that they're still using the same broken
methods to find the same answers. How do
we not assume that it's gonna end up
in the same broken way. It's putting significant
pressure on paramedics c orange has been called
every day of the past week 20 times
in the past month. And that the most
serious health alert where the whole health system
is notified that ambulances are under pressure and
extra staff are called in. It's And don't
forget in the Uk. They did this whole
breakdown where they make the same claim about
few ambulances as there's overwhelmed almost every year
well before Covid.
So the story is that the same thing
happens even after Covid. So there's no difference,
Got it. But they just make it sound.
Like, oh, my god Our hair on fire
of it, and you look at the data,
and it's the same... Yes, They're overwhelmed. That
that happens in that seemingly every season. That
was in Uk at The very least. Right?
And so all of this builds to the
idea that what their solution? A dangerous thing.
A thing we know is hurting people. Get
it right now. Hurry up for the thing
that we can't even prove is actually happening
at the very least is not dangerous based
on any metric. You can look at anywhere.
So it's not hard to recognize. This is
high. No matter how you look at it,
because it gets people scared. It it gets
people... You talking using the, you know, sharing
the information in regard to their link or
their Youtube channel or watching it on Tv.
It becomes about
promotion. And I guarantee you they're getting a
benefit from that. Seeing us how every corporate
platform out there, 1 of their leading advertisers
are
big pharma companies. Now the Victorian health department
is urging everyone reassuring everyone that they are
prepared for these busy. Winter months, but there
are a. Unless it gets a little bit
more bad. And all, my God we're screwed
because nobody can deal with this. Right? It's
not what happened last time. Don't worry. We're
super prepared.
And then everything hair on fire for the
rest of the time because I think it's
about framing it as we're prepared. And then
we weren't prepared for this is what happens
every single time. I mean, you think I'm
if you haven't followed this, look at every
single event we've talked about. Even in their
exercises, they come to the conclusion that we
weren't ready. Is that ridiculous? It's because this
is about predictive programming.
In my opinion anyway. Otherwise, you have to
acknowledge that they're some of the most in
ne...
Incompetent entities that we've ever experienced
and why are they still in power? Because
is everywhere you look. Every single time, that
the thing, okay. Good example. Event 02:01.
What did they find in the event 02:01?
The conclusion at least the some of the
main ones where we didn't have enough piece
enough ventilators. We didn't have enough Ppe. We
were repaired for x y and z?
Okay? They they laid it out, what they
do.
And I'm trust... I'm not even suggesting Those
are the right things or that this is
not all on illusion. My point is this...
What they presented to you, was that we
said we did needed these things. They didn't
do those things and how did it end
up? We didn't have an event. We didn't
end Ppp. We
because that's the way it was supposed to
go in my opinion. Look at the far
as pandemic and the the the exercises, they
come to those conclusions that we were caught
lying or they didn't have enough It's like
even when the exercise that they admit to
you they're dishonest. It's it's actually pretty mind
blowing. A couple of messages are from health
officials for. Tau and the first is to
save triple 0 calls for ambulances for genuine
emergencies, and the second is to consider getting
the whole family of flu jab. Sell.
What thing you don't need just in case.
Right? It's the same kind of mantra that
we've seen for the very beginning. Sell I'm,
I'm thought same thing for a flu shot
or whatever we talk about, we realize that
these problems have been there from before. There...
If you look into the information, you can
see an overt an increase in my that
from the flu shot.
This... We I did a whole segment on
this. That's not to say that that... You
know, the point is this is always your
choice. Despite what they pushed on you throughout
this whole process. You can decide for yourself
if you care to do the research, and
not just blindly trust what your doctor says
or trust what the media says, which is
where the doctor tends to look.
Is that ultimately, there are risks to all
of these things, and I'll make that clear
with the mccabe shot of whatever it's called.
We'll get to the H5N1H8
and 1, which is the shot. We'll talk
about that a second
that there are risks with all of these
things. And so if you think there's a
risk to you,
from the flu,
factor that in? What does that look like?
Am I gonna die? Most
almost never in in most people's circumstances,
So what can happen over here. They don't
ever do that. They just scream at you
that it's the right thing to do because
there's a whole business around this. And some
of them think that.
Let me go over some of these risks,
but wait in a second actually before that,
we're gonna get to.
I'll me include that really quickly.
Make sure you watch this. If you haven't
seen this
this this discussion with any Ran corps.
Now on that point, she's talking about testing
and all... And... So, again, it's very important
to recognize they're still using the Pcr test.
They're still utilizing exactly what led this astra.
I mean, again, it's in possible to me
that this wasn't a a deliberate action. Every
single thing we've talked about from the from
the mass conversation, the study from... I think
it was 2015
that proves in their peer of your research,
the same research they told you to trust
that the cloth mask for increasing illness in
every possible way. Not just Covid, but increasing
your risk of illness. They knew it. I
highlighted it. I titled in 20 20 and
I screamed about it ever since. And yet
they first cloth masks in particular on everybody,
gaining extra illness. Okay? The Pcr test. Well,
here's the point there. This is from 2007.
I've highlighted this 4000 times. I'll just play
the clip again as I played in the
opening because I think it's important to see
that if you didn't catch the opening, and
you can read this for yourself.
The main points,
the epidemic that wasn't.
About 8 months, they went on. People got
sick. They put people in quarantine. They hospital
beds, the whole 9 yards. Not a single
case was actually confirmed they were using a
Pcr test.
Now they look back, they oh my god.
We placed too much faith in the Pcr.
Wow.
And her whole point is that we'll do
this again. We'll do. Gotta make sure we
learn from this and you know what they
did learn from it. They just went the
other direction. Pcr test. And out the case
you just didn't see play the clip. It's
very fast. But they say the most troubling
aspect is that all the decisions seem so
sensible. Why? Because they're trusting an industry. They're
trusting
authority?
Doesn't mean you disregard authority in some cases,
that is the right move. Doesn't mean you
just blindly do 1 of the other. It's
like question everything, I it. No. We question
everything and we accept all possibilities. Or entertain
them. In this case, but Of course, you
question authority because Can't they just make a
mistake. This idea that we're supposed to blindly
follow anything is ridiculous.
But let's watch the clips. In case you
haven't seen it. This is important.
Faith and quick test leads to epidemic it
wasn't in 01/22/2007.
Nearly everyone involved thought the medical Center had
had a whoop cough outbreak. Nearly 1000
healthcare workers in in New Hampshire were given
a test
Results were in, a hundred and 42 people,
including the doctor herself, were told that they
appeared to have Whoop cough. Thousands were given
antibiotics a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were
taken out of commission, including some of the
intensive care. Sound familiar. The whole thing was
a false alarm. Not a single case of
Whoop cough was confirmed.
With the definitive test. They placed too much
faith
in a quick, highly sensitive molecular test that
led them astra.
Yeah. You get the point. That's important. That
it's important to make sure read the entire
article. It's very important to understand how easy
that was to manipulate. And even if you
think it was all in accident.
I find it impossible to believe that they
weren't aware of that, and there wasn't a
conversation around how that happened. It was a
huge event. It was a big deal. New
york times wrote an entire article about it,
and it was a big conversation at the
time and they were very clear. I, it
was dartmouth. Right? And they were saying, look,
this is a problem We need to make...
I... I'm convinced that that is exactly what
happened.
And they just decided... Well, we will use
that. We'll use that.
Aiming mean and really, we could go off
and
there's multiple ways that this can be used
to lie about a lot of stuff, not
even just in medical freedom. But
include this article well, similar image to the
Danny Rand court 1, but You have every
reason to question everything you're told about variants
vaccines, mass and Pcr tests. It's a good
down there's a lot of other shows there
you should watch as well.
Now, here's where I think is most incredible
that we're talking about this right now when
there's nothing really happening. No one's even being
barely even talking about this.
And now they're... They're... The Fda advisors, you
know, the same 1 they broadly ignored about
damn near everything during height of this, who
would vote that we don't need this or
it's not safe. Or doesn't, no, they would
disregard them. Many of them resign and protest
because they weren't wanna look, now they vote
the new ones, the ones that aren't are
probably more amenable
to unanimously in vote in favor of the
updated Covid 19 shot.
The updated Covid 19 shot.
Now, look, the flu conversation is is the
the ways they way they frame this every
year is that they well, they guess. Right?
We go, what do we think is happening.
What do we think the most likely variant
is
and they make a shot around it? Now,
course, we talk about the quad vale and
this what most these are these days? Multiple
the shots in there, multiple
variances were told, and, you know, in assuming
you believe any of it.
My point is just like during a Covid
19 conversation. Well, isn't there an issue with
having multiple things cause multiple antibodies. Well, yeah,
There really is. And this is why they
talked about that during Covid before. Doesn't mean
it's guaranteed to cause a problem, but it
certainly can. And so you have to consider
those...
Is the flu of that dangerous?
Can you deal with some sniff and a
headache and and and, you know, think about
it versus
lasting issues, my diet. They mean, these things
to some degree are capable possible with all
of these.
Point being that the quad vale does produce
antibodies that took to multiple things which can
cause problems in and of itself. But this
isn't the new 1 they're telling you for
the Covid 19 shots. So this whole whole
time. It's been there apparently with the old
thing. And still you can still forget if
you want,
with all the risks and all the problems
and all the very serious issues, which by
the way still apply to this right now,
and they went away from the buy mail
at quad, all the rest of it now
just 1, just for 1 thing you're aiming
it at. It was all the hype around
all that's happening and all the 40000 variant
they're hype all the time to go to
1
I mean, listen, you know If you haven't
watched the show, I don't recommend you get
any of this.
Any of the Covid trials. Any of the
Mrna, let alone any of the rest we're
talking about, but
For them to go down to 1, it
just seems like a really interesting narrative shift.
So it says the committee voted on the
question,
for the 20 24 to 20 25
formula. Or so they're getting ready just like
they told you just like many of us
told you they would, but they called a
conspiracy at the time, it's gonna become just
like the flu. They're gonna give you a
routine shot. And, you know, we're gonna get
to a point where they're gonna combine these
things. They're gonna add new things because gonna
pretend, like, it's all safe and effective since
we're just leaving it there. Right?
It says done,
does the committee recommend a mono vigilant
JN1
lineage, which for those... Maybe those of you
that are really acutely paying attention to this,
I've been focused elsewhere recently, but I'm, you
know, keep an eye on it, but JN1.
New what to me?
All 16 people said yes. Let's make 1
based on that new thing. Then it says
if the agency agrees with its advisory committee.
So the Fda of course, will agree seeing
as out they're just a complete vaccine, you
know, I mean, we've seen through the Covid
19 conversation. The Fda
routinely ignored its experts it routinely went with
the side of what politics and Big Pharma
was what... I mean, they were caught from
lying about I in an actual court of
law. These people are not on your side.
Now that doesn't mean every every person, every
facet of the conversation is... Will fully deceiving
you. I believe in all of these industries
you'll find, and I do believe their industry
you'll find elements of people that believe they're
doing the right thing, whether it's Aid or
any of these. I make that point. We
just saw them screaming at Samantha powers about
how we're not doing the right thing. It's
like, well, you don't know what this job
really is. These people are not out there
fight for freedom. They're actively committing regime change
for other things. But in this case, same
get same thing. I... There's probably plenty of
people in the Fda. I think they're doing
the right thing.
Plenty. Well, that's a that's a stretch, but
either way. The point is
If they agree the Fda. After their advisors,
the new shot will be a mono vaccine
offer protection against 1 barrett.
So with all the risks that are guaranteed
in this thing, which will go over again.
This is the same mrna dangerous shot,
even if you think this thing has a
benefit. Now they're only aiming it at once.
So your risk could still be that you
get the other thing.
And die from the super dangerous covid it's
not actually dangerous even possibly there. Nonetheless,
I think this is about trying to
lessen the scare the the the worry people
have about all the different overlapping things. But
it says, the Fda told the Advisory Committee
Wednesday that studies have shown that currently available
covid vaccines appear to be less effective against
the various that are now in circulation. Well,
I'm gonna... I'm getting to a point here
about why the hilarious
currently seeing us how this thing has been
around since December.
It's been... They they were telling you was
80 percent of what was going on a
long, like, 6 months ago, 7 months ago.
So how does that make sense? With everything
else they were screaming at you, and just
so you're clear on this. I don't believe
any of this. I believe the hype and
the lies about as as doctor Yi pointed
out. He calls them Sk or Sam, basically
h the smallest difference that will not make
a difference in the long run. When it
says when manufacturers updated their vaccines last year
to better match the variance that were in
circulation then, it seemed to better offer protection.
This is what they actually said.
Match does matter somewhat.
Doctor Jerry Ware, director of the division of
viral products in the office of vaccines research
and review what the Fda said, are I
you serious?
It matters somewhat.
If it's that... But if it's such a
small matter that why don't we just aim
it whatever we want and say, well, it'll
work because you say that anyway, You said
it during Alm Macron, the rest of them,
whatever was really happening when it was not
working, and the data showed it wasn't. We
highlighted that, you called his conspiracy theorist. And
then 6 months later we look back and
go, oh, yeah. It wasn't working very well.
Well, duh, we were saying at the same
time. The point is it's the same damn
thing.
It's there's 2 ways to look at. If
you believe there's a thing J 1 circulating
out there. The point is that this is
not dangerous to you based on the information
we currently have, even according to them. The
Mrna shot is very dangerous for you. So
it's a ridiculous thing to do.
If it's not actually there, this is about
them trying to can, like, they're... You know,
I'm really just typing the threat to force
you into doing this, and I don't know
why if you didn't think it was there
you even touched this. But does it matter
somewhat? Like, an in logically we applied to
this that doesn't make any sense at all.
Of good should matter entirely.
If you're aiming at the wrong thing, it
doesn't matter much. I mean, this doesn't make
much sense to me. Here's what it says.
The Covid 19 cases are relatively low right
now,
only 3 to 4 percent of people who
are getting tested
have the virus. So not just 3 3
percent to 4 percent of people, but people
who are getting tested for it only 3
percent of them seem to have it? Now,
are you seeing Covid deaths right now? We'll
know. You know why? Because this is not
dangerous.
And it says, by comparison, the peak of
the O surge, which I still ask whether
that was even... You know, I mean, there's
so many facets to get into this whether
A was the released things with South Africa
or, you know, Bosnia and all that conversation
or Thoughts botswana. Excuse me.
And it says, in the surge of 20
21, test positivity rates were at 30 percent.
Well, we went over this manipulation at the
Omni conversation. There was a a dropout in
regard to test that they just labeled as
the new thing even though before that was
used as a negative test. So essentially, they
started negative test or becoming O.
I mean, there's so many angles to this
and the point was at that hype. You
could prove that that was a manipulation. So
the question is, are they now manipulating it
to be a low number or is they
just... I mean,
I don't think we should be trusting any
of this stuff, which I'm pretty sure you're
all in the same vein about.
Now here
are what they're highlighting. J and 1.
Being tracked by the Cdc. It says as
of December eighth,
12/08/2023.
They projected this variant comprises 29 percent.
So here... Oh, and then it says, j...
It's a variant of the... It's closely related
to the B286.
The same thing from before.
So ask yourself if they were claiming that
the earlier ones. The very... The original thing
they gave you was still having a strong
effect against whatever variant they were in last
time.
And they're telling you they need to make
this 1 even though it's a few off
of the Ba 1 they just put out.
Is that just vaccine sales or just trying
to out a new thing to pump new
sales probably,
at the end of the day,
the new... Every year around... Before I jump
ahead, actually. This is
the other part of the variant. This is
as of January 30 first.
So in January, they were telling you that
it was
83
to 88 percent of all that was circulating.
So even if that's true. And again, under
current all this I don't believe any of
but the point is that their claiming was
88 percent. In gen January.
It's June sixth right now. So where to
believe this thing has been circulating.
If we're gonna believe their narrative, it spreads
like crazy and circulates all over it, we're
not gonna talk about it. It's not what's
happening. So it's not dangerous if it's even
there,
But we're gonna believe that now it's the
key. It's the peak right now. All this
time later, it's the 1 that's circulating. I
don't believe that for a second even if
it's active even
Again, based on narrative not to make it
confusing for everybody, but the point is I
genuinely don't believe that this is even happening.
Since centers for disease control and prevention, project
that j 1 cases in January
will continue to rise through the winter.
They're talking about last winter, guys. The World
Health organizations declared to a variant of interest.
There's no evidence that Jan 1 causes more
severe disease,
But it spreads,
it's the same thing I've been telling you
from the very beginning of this. Well, if
you understand that if doctor Eaton and plenty
of other experts that Have honesty
Well telling you that that's what usually happens.
They get less virulent. They spread more and
the populate becomes benign becomes a background thing,
like blues and everything else we deal with.
So they're telling. That's what's happening. Instead, they
jam an injection in there. They create the
problem by using these injections, and we highlighted
this 45 times during the peak of this.
What they were doing is what's create not
just the side effects, but in fact, is
creating... I think it's called a leaky vaccine.
They've created
the thing that causes the problem. It creates
kind of indefinite sickness. It creates these things
to then actually mutate if you believe that's
what's happening.
So it's a compounding problem. They're the ones
created thing they later point to.
It's pretty easy to understand. So when you're
dealing with something that they're admitting is
less virulent. It's not this, but it just
spreads a lot. The reality should be to
let that happen. You're not hurting people to
then gain immunity to an actual immunity. Not
jamming a dangerous a shot in your child's
arm that can actually removes their immunity causes
them to get sick and an act you're
keeping people safe.
This is luna, just like before.
Now my point in all of this is
that as this is all going on. And
again,
there's a lot more angles we can go
into, but I who knows that this is
actually gonna be hyped. This is just what
they're saying. They're gonna make new shots for
and maybe they'll just say there. It's there
if you want it.
I who knows?
I I don't... Like, am my gut. Kinda
tells me it doesn't really make sense for
them to try it again.
I've obviously it failed.
Even it was something real. I feel like
people would just be, like, shut up. We
don't wanna hear it. A lot of people,
even the people that took a lot of
the shots who are now very much aware
that they were dupe. But don't say it
out loud. They just stopped taking them quietly
as we all saw. Right?
So I just don't think it's gonna happen.
I think it'll be something different. I hope
anyway, and I hope it'll be something that
we can easily identify. But as I just
highlighted before, this worries me because this is
still happening. This was posted as of June
second, it was actually a letter from May
sixteenth from the the my mayo mayo clinic.
And it says they rejected a lung transplant
due to a lack of full covid
vaccination. And as the perpetual shadow band writes,
what's even considered full?
I mean, that's actually shockingly stupid to read
what they're doing there because as he rightly
points out,
you... From state to state, it was different.
From 2 to 4,
2 plus the new nearby ava or 9
plus the rich. I mean, it was all
over the map. Not even talking about the
world.
So
if the idea was that it was either
2 from the very beginning,
which even based on their information would you
your immune is gone after months, if not
right in the beginning.
And, of course, you have an entire immune
system problem forever,
or you supposed to take the new by
Vale 1, then plus another 1 and that
that... Any... Either way you look at this
to pretend that a full vaccine person is
somehow identifiable right now. Is it's this is
about politics.
And they're rejecting this person who needs a
lung transplant because they haven't taken something they
don't need that it's actually far more dangerous
for them. For their long included.
That's crazy.
Now don't forget some points that we'll include
again today for that we've talked about many
different times. This is a January 20 23
peer reviewed study from Science direct, just to
make sure we understand that the peer reviewed
leading science from the I group on this
topic.
That there's... This has been retracted. There's nothing
new app this that I can see that's
done this extensive of... Mean there's this is
the reality, guys. This is where this was
left. Age strat an infection fatality rate of
Covid 19.
Very important points here.
The average infection fatality rate.
I just read this actually is more... The
at a global level
what this 1 just breaks down each age
group, which is important because realizing under 19
is point 0003
percent.
Shockingly less than the flu or damage or
anything,
but reading the general 1, the most important
at a global level.
Pre vaccination. Right? Before anybody's gets before everything.
Infection fatality rate may have been as low
as 0.03
and 0.07,
both less than the flu,
for 59
and 69 under, respectively.
The most important part I think is 94
percent of the global population is younger than
70. 94 percent of the world
is in that category of 0.03 to 0.07.
Less than the flu. 0.1.
I mean, shockingly.
So the is that this is exactly what
we were always saying. This is less flu,
it's not dangerous and that's even if for
you can argue it's not even there.
In any case,
they're h something that is now less than
that because this was the beginning, and it's
only gotten as they just told you, less
dangerous, but more spreading,
they're doing this for the sniff.
And you're gonna... And you could die from
the thing they're giving you to treat the
sniff. They're giving you something that can cause
lasting hard problems, blood clots, brain issues,
Trio disease. I mean, for Cry out, loud.
This has gotta be 1 of the most
dangerous things I've ever looked at, and they're
giving it for you to something that the
science shows, you know, the trust the science
discussion shows is not dangerous.
I mean, in a sense that, you know,
anything can be,
but this based on what they're h of
the benefits outweigh the risks
the benefits do not outweigh the risks when
it comes to the injection,
as well as the fact that these important
study from June 20 22 shows you the
risks of the injection.
In innate immune suppression.
Some people have been dealing with this ever
since,
getting sick constantly having all sorts of immune
autoimmune or immune suppression, all sorts of things.
This one's about specifically innate immune suppression.
May name of course, immune autoimmune versus immune
suppression is under active versus overactive. In any
case, both very dangerous.
And as it says, the highlights Mrna vaccine
promote sustained synthesis of the spike protein. Something
we were telling you right in the beginning,
not because we guessed, but because we listened
to experts and we looked at the science
they were ignoring.
Compared it to the other conversation, but, of
course, based on the trial data and what
we're seeing because we were looking at that
too. Going back to Forbes covering it in
20 20, which is why we knew that
the data was not... They didn't even try
to see that if a stop transmission. He
even tells Ax on the record even said
that if we were paid more, we could
have done that. And then it breaks in
20 22 because they talk about it in,
I think rue asked it in the u...
The part the,
the parliament
conversation,
which was good. They talked about it, but
it was
very old information to those watching this platform.
The protein is neuro toxic and appears dna
repair mechanisms. On, and the sustained synthesis Right?
The spike protein continues to get made. It's
not just near shoulder muscle, All these things
that we are breaking down long before most
we're out there talking about it. Spike protein
is neuro toxic.
Suppression of type 1, your interferon responses result
in impaired innate immunity, which means you get
sicker,
whether or not it's Covid, or whatever you
wanna call it, your body is trying to
get sick, then you're wearing a mask and
increase your risk of illness and everything. And
even the flu shot pushed before the Covid
19 conversation which the Pentagon study themselves showed
an increased risk of general illness specifically
coronavirus is in 1 case,
because you took the flu shot before this.
All this is on the records. All science
and peer reviewed. The Mrna vaccines potentially cause
increased rescue to infections and disease cancers. There
it is.
C c
optimization results in g rich Mrna that is
unpredictable complex effects. And we've talked about that
later. That's why we have really focused on
with this study because this study can't before
that topic was really something we were hot
talking about, but the code down optimization. Right?
We talked about that specifically was 1 of
the changes to the newer shots. They said,
oh, it's nothing. It's nothing. Well, yeah. It
is. It's something. It's something.
Now, here's what's interesting too by the way.
Did you look at what's going on here,
guys. For those in the podcast, this is
the way back machine. And and I tried
to use this just to make sure we
had that way back version of this and
it's the same study. In innate immunity. Parenthesis
instance the the same study we just looked
at. Way back machine is adding its own
notices now.
Context about this provided by lead stories. Are
you kidding me? Great data it'll make your
laugh out loud. Guess what? Contacts matching provided
by Google Fact Check markup tool.
Why in the world are they doing that?
Probably because they got forced to?
This is this is an archive. Now you're
you're you're inserting your fact check bullet points
over an archive page. That's the whole I,
this is where stepping in into some dangerous
time as you guys are all very well
aware.
Now, there's a couple of important newer points
around the Covid 19 shot angle of this.
Which by the way you've heard from us
and people like Lust test Lowry and plenty
of others, doctor Test Lowry.
She says we have reached out to the
tele telegraph us to provide evidence on Covid
vaccine harms.
It's saying that Covid vaccine pharma
reports concluded in June 20 22 that the
number of and severity of adverse events reported
on international
pharma
databases were sufficient to indicate a recall of
these products.
Which, of course, we've only seen now what
Astra, and they kind pretend It wasn't a
recall even though, I I think that was
all designed. I said that very early if
you remember both Astra and Johnson and Johnson
were far less dangerous than the Mrna and
versions, but they seem to focus on those
ones more.
I I think that was part the planet.
If you wanna ask me honestly, but I
know I can't prove that. But either way,
the Mrna Pfizer Modern are the are the
most dangerous things that we're talking about today.
So what she's highlighting is that they reached
out to them because this is what the
telegraph wrote. On June fourth. This is while
they're putting the new things out. Right? They're
now updating the new shots. It's the same
mrna platform with all the same problems, They're
just tweaking the the... What the the instructions
are given.
It still has the same mrna platform issues,
the same lipid nano particle issues, the same
spike protein issues. These are dangerous.
But here's the telegraph says on June fourth.
Covid vaccines could be
partly to blame for the rise in excess
death since pandemic. Oh, my god, they're finally
acknowledging a fraction of that could be partly
maybe to blame for the thing that we
all know it's causing. Come on.
Obviously, this is what's happening. It's... There's never
been a more statistically aligned issue I've ever...
In my lifetime.
The the location. I'm look, I'm not saying
that that would mean that I will say
that the evidence in my... My opinion, hundred
percent that was causing Excess death. Hundred percent.
And that's what's causing the large part of
it. I guarantee some of that distributed to
other issues. That's my opinion. And then I
would say that I think the data overwhelmingly
points in that direction. But then, of course,
being objective, I can't say that I can
prove. That's what's happening
other than, I think pointing data which, you
know, like, at some point, you get to
a point where you say, yeah, That is
proving that. But again, you know, irr irritating
objective, I think was a line where I
just think it's important today to go far
in the other direction. But in any case,
clearly, the Covid shots, the places that were
highly vaccinated during Covid 19 are all the
places that are almost in perfect alignment alignment
with the shots being given and the excess
death.
The places that were less vaccinated, less excess.
It's very simple. And 1 of the vaccines
causing,
part the problems. My diet is heart attacks,
blood,
blood clots strokes,
brain issue. I mean, for crying out Wow.
It's the easiest thing to see in the
world. Then, there's another collapsing athlete, but we
don't know we're baffled.
Either way, it's important to recognize that as
that's happening
or rather as their
they're rolling out new shots. They're admitting at
least a fraction of it. Well, it could
be to blame. I mean, even that as
a win, even though they're trying to... They're...
What they're doing with this kind of reporting,
just like with Israel, trying to give you
a fraction little steam
release valve. Is that enough? But you let
it go if we halfway point to it?
No, we won't.
But it's still a win, and we still
take it and go yep. We knew it
just like we said, but it's more than
that, and we're gonna keep harming you until
you say the full story was they never
will, you know, usually.
That those things are causing excess death around
the world, and it's the most obvious part
of the whole conversation. You're not following less,
excuse me test lowry, doctor Tesla I recommend
you do.
Sofia doll, Highlights another important part. Now, this
is from... This is a Canadian researcher I
understand it, but I believe it's about Philippine
information. She's at the Philippine House of representatives.
Explosive findings have been revealed.
The Philippine House of representatives committee investigation and
into hundreds of thousands of excess deaths believed
to be linked to the Covid backs.
The committee heard that not only have there
been hundreds of thousands of excess deaths since
Covid 19 backs rollout, but there has also
been a decline
in nearly 1000000 births since the. Don't forget
That's the other side of this. It's killing
people, but it's also causing infer fertility.
Birth problems
neonatal death,
premature that Scotland
threw it all in the rug say, we're
not gonna look at it because vaccine.
I Don't know how they're not all prison
for something that blatant. This is what she
was saying on the record.
I've been monitoring the deaths reported by the
Psa
covering
2021,
2022
and now 2023.
We can...
I'd like to update on Actually, I... It's
just the Canadian independent. I guess they broke
this, but I I... She doesn't sound like
she's from the Philippines, but in case, the
Canadian independent is where the credit goes for
breaking this clip out there. The latest excess
deaths in the Philippines.
Okay. Since we had in 20
21,
we had
40
43.2
percent excess deaths.
However, there was additional data given to
From the Psa
that increased the excess deaths. It's higher than
has been published. So there was additional data
given so we actually have 43.9
percent excess deaths.
Okay. This is just very quickly. This is
our birth data.
And it starts at the top from 2019,
and it shows that we have had a
loss of babies
every single year since the pandemic has started.
So 2019
was our last normal birth year. And the
last line at the bottom is 2023,
and we can see that our births are
even lower this year. Next slide, please.
Okay. This slide is showing a cumulative
loss of births
since 2000
up to 2023
in the current data. The baseline is the
2015
to 2019
and your data.
And if we look at this figure up
to September of 2023
because the data is not complete. After that,
we have lost nearly a million Filipino babies
who have not been born over the pandemic
years.
Next slide, please.
Now they love to attribute that to all
sorts of other things. And certainly, there's gonna
be some level of effect for you know,
any number of other things they've always listed
off. But you can't pretend like that dramatic
of a decline. Along with excess death are
not the most obvious thing in the world.
And that's why so many of these doctors
and scientists have been really waking up woken
up by this in a real sense. Right?
Like, that they they even ones that were
maybe even not fully seen the Covid 19
conversation are now standing back and going my
God, like this is statistically
obvious,
and it's it's causing people to really get...
You know, and, I think it's a positive
thing, even it's based on terrible thing that
happened that it's it's shaking people free. Same
with a... The same thing I say about
the Israel Gaza conversation, it's just impossible not
to see how obvious these things are. And
I I think it
attributed to the fact that they're losing control
for a lot of different reasons. At least,
I hope that. But any case, I think
more people every day are finding it impossible
not to acknowledge what this is along with
a lot of other things.
This is the death data, The very big
spike are the deaths in 2021,
which started in March of 2021
immediately consecutive
with the start of the vaccine rollout.
And the very big spike in deaths that
we see in July and August
is actually consecutive with the rollout of the
Jan and vaccines. There was a big spike
in deaths exactly concurrent with that.
So 2022,
we had lower deaths, but the deaths was
still higher than 2020
by around 8 percent, 8 to 9 percent.
2023,
our data is still incomplete, but the deaths
in 2023
are already nearly 10 percent higher in 2022.
So a 10 percent excess deaths would be
considered a black swan event, you would not
expect that. But we have had consecutive years
of excess deaths since 20021.
And next slide,
I'll leave. That's by half the video. You
guys can walk the rest of it. It's
it's exactly what you might expect. I mean,
it's it's unreal. And here,
it's an important thing to realize.
And just so it's clear that was... I
think we've made this clear many times over.
I mean... Even as I she pointed that
Johnson and Johnson, you, there's a lot of
angles to them. All these things are dangerous,
and it's not just, you know, just the
spike protein, just the lipid nano particle just
nano particles in general. Just, I mean... It's
all of these things bind are like, this
is 1 of the reasons why a lot
of us make the point that it it
almost seems statistically impossible for someone to have
accidentally made this things dangerous as it is.
The other way to say that is it
was designed to be deadly.
But I think what we're talking about here
with this article is that
those are that dangerous in and of themselves.
But the the problem is as the 1
of these peer reviewed studies found, it's actually
the platform itself.
The mrna platform that's specifically driving the problem.
That's on top of the things that are
being caused and everything else.
So the point is that it's just by
making it right now as they approve a
new shot with a new variant. Acting like,
now, that'll be different,
because they disregard the fact that the the
the the platform. The pieces themselves are the
problem? Why because an entire industry had built
around this new experimental direction.
And it's even admitted now that they jammed
that forward right the beginning because they wanted
that to be the direction. So you could
even argue. I don't think this, but that
the 1 thing that went wrong was they
were just so interested in making this new
direction work that they forced that through, and
that's where all the problems came from. I
I think I think it's much more nefarious
and complicated than that. But they'll say at
to some point, they're still holding to the
mrna flat form plug and play direction,
and even though the peer reviewed scientist has
shown that in and of itself is the
problem or 1 of the main problems.
So here,
horrifying enough is what somebody in congress is
saying. And this is June second. This is
posted anyway. So this is a new video.
Of the person in Congress,
just I'm just basically stating everything the opposite
of what's really going on in regard to
the Covid shots. And Covid 19.
Clarify
some of the truly
insane
attacks on vaccines and
what happened during the pandemic that we heard
a little bit earlier today, I was, I
found to be really wild. I I just
wanna reiterate that during the pandemic, we lost
1300000.0
American lives.
In my city alone, we lost almost 1300
lives, back home in California and in the
city of Long Beach. Let's not forget, by
the way, that and we've heard directly from
our own Us congress and or people representatives
of local government saying that, well, if they
dive in a car accident, and they go
in, they could test for Covid, that goes
to Covid 19 shot, or you know, Covid
19 case
we were hurt... We were told people could
die in motorcycle accidents after they got tested
and that goes down as Covid 19 death.
These are very real to this very day,
guys. Whether they
employ all those things or not is up
to them, which is ridiculous even when you
think about it out, Say it out loud.
I mean shouldn't it be consistent? Yes.
That's how they made this all seem so
muddled as well. But
those numbers are still pointed to, despite the
fact that we we showed you they find
flu in pneumonia with the Covid numbers, they
have those flimsy p that Pcr testing. I
mean, every which way this was... At the
very at least in embellished a hell of
a lot, if not completely made up.
And we know that many of the folks
that we lost would
have lived if they had had access to
the vaccine,
oh, would they and we know that? Why
are these people so childish? Why are the
people in major positions of power? So completely
broaden s and ass substantive?
Because their politician. They're not there to get...
They don't... I think these people are if
not completely compromised are in it for their
own interest. That's what politicians are today. It
shouldn't... I don't think that's saying it always
are, maybe.
And if they didn't have access to it,
I mean, what are you talking about? Where
do they live in a cave somewhere
everywhere in the world, not only get access
to it, but most cases were for it.
And he's now trying to rewrite the reality
as if they just couldn't find it somewhere,
I mean, this is luna and these people
I... Maybe he actually believes that, which speaks
to my point about how ridiculous these people
are and aren't actually the ones making decisions.
Or had been vaccinated. We know that for
a fact.
We know the success of vaccines. And, we
know it for a fact he says. Certainly,
today with more data when a how effective
they've been. What about that? With the new
data, we know how effective they've been.
Do you think he believes that?
What's concerning now as we know is it's
early childhood vaccinations, are reaching new lows. We're
having other diseases come forward like measles and
other
diseases or or we are now not addressing
Okay. He just mum his way past that
nonsense Measles and other stuff, and, you know,
what
actually, what's really happening is you can actually
take the data, and look Oh my God,
well visits are down shockingly for people that
aren't getting their opening shots or in the
number of overlaps. And we just take a
look at James Lance Wei and other va
versus on back studies that almost you... Every
single time you look at 1 of these
you'll never find them from the Cdc or
anywhere else because it shows you this every
time that the
children are
exponentially more healthy without the shot they're getting
throughout their
adolescent years.
Now again, that's not to say that if
they were done right with the right intentions
with the right, you know, that they could
be different, but I'm just stating the obvious
facts. And I believe that the actual intent
behind me or lack of concern for the
side effect or whatever else are 1 of
the largest reasons. But very well could be
that it's all big scam and are lying
in the first we should be genuinely asking
that. But I just don't think I know
that. My point will be is if what
we know about these are correct It's a
big if. I would argue is the intent
behind them and the lack of concern for
the outcome or maybe the experimentation. In any
case, you can see the very clear positive
effects if these children were not doing that.
And what do they point to? Oh random
hype story about measles or other things that
he can't even remember to say right there.
Which by the way, in most cases you
look to and it's go, well, didn't you
tell us that these were eradicated because of
the vaccine, and now because they take them,
they just magically pop back up. That doesn't
seem to make much sense.
But in any case,
This is about lie upon lie upon why.
Because all of this vaccine denial that is
happening,
unfortunately, not just across this country, but also
here, in congress and in this chamber.
Vaccine hasn't seen
outside of what happened Covid 19, is going
to cause this country great harm.
Difficult called freedom. That's quote you're right to
make your own decisions, but, you know, they
love to go. You have a right to
do this, but then if you don't do
it we're gonna... You're... And that's usually how
it starts.
Right? As we saw during the Covid conversation,
it, you know, first, it's... Which shouldn't be
the case anyway where they
pressure and they be little and they attack
then eventually becomes forced in many cases like
we already saw. But the idea that you're...
That you get outward pressure from your government
to do something that's supposed to be your
choice because it's somehow a greater good for
society even though that's not actual what's happening,
it's very frustrating.
And I think as we could point to
many, many, many, very high credential, high highly
respected experts that will tell you. Like, I
mean, there's people like,
shoot forgetting his about Pierre Corey.
Who has been going through this journey himself,
and may, he's made that clear that if
at first, he he recognized the Covid shot
was dangerous and that has opened him up
to this larger conversation. What about the rest
of them? And it's the same kind of
journey where you can clearly see that he
has every reason to question
whether they just been lying about those 2,
which doesn't have to mean that they're all
dangerous. They always will be. Again, that's a
very real question we should be asking and
I think it's leaning more and more in
that direction. But the point is that
we have every reason to ask whether or
not the rest of them were also lied
about or that they were hiding other side
effects. Just look at Pfizer track record of
doing exactly that, and we can't piece that
together. People like this have a lot of
reasons in their pocket to not piece that
together.
And instead of doing the responsible thing. Earlier
today, we had of folks on the other
side,
attack vaccines,
with, in my opinion, conspiracy theories and with
treatments that we know are ineffective and have
shown not to not to work. Oh, yeah.
Like I ec is what he's talking about
at the rest of them, even though that's
literally the opposite of what the data shows,
and they've all been gru forced to admit
that, but see This is about a grand
standing moment to make these statements so it
All goes in the record.
You realized that. Right. Right as he said
statement, the Fda was ruled in front of
a court to admit they lied about the
Iv conversation. Where the... I mean, I can
go off forever about this. But even then,
I'm I'm... Just like I said at the
beginning. I don't like the idea of supporting
any of these drugs. They're all big pharma
drugs at the end of the, and I
think that natural stuff is most likely better
in my personal opinion, but you can make
your own choices.
But he's still saying this now.
Oh, there's Instagram. Centered by show. I knew
it what's gonna happen soon enough.
Thank you for those that were there. Reach
out to them, let him know. Instagram Sent
Ryan's show every single day. Back to the
back to the clip.
We also know this is not just a
matter of personal choice. Across the country, there
are millions of people who don't have the
choice...
Who can I get vaccinated because they might
be too young, the? They might be even
compromised
or have other underlying health conditions. And so
America's high vaccination rates is something that has
helped our country for so long with the
Fda has been so involved with. You know
what I love about that ridiculous claim, and
I made this point then.
Who did they pressure to get the shots
the most during Covid? And you don't compromise.
The elderly,
people that are... That can't... Like, so historically,
the people that were most
who or like he just said, We have
to get everybody else because those people can't
get them?
Well, then why did you force them to
get it first? Why did you make entire
cases about white children elderly I should get
them first
because that none of this is all just
not talking points.
And on top of that, the idea is
that you're supposed to get give everybody these
shots so they can be protected like, this
is a ridiculous mindset.
First of all, that's kind of counterintuitive of
freedom in your personal choice.
But immune
natural immunity has always been the reality these
conversations, and we can prove that what you're
giving them to keep them safe, In fact
removes that from them. You're causing things to
be every
part of the story. The injection they gave
caused the new variant if you believe that's
what's happening. These shots they gave them caused
these things to spread. Cause more things to
happen. Or even if we're just talking about
the spike protein itself that does shed that
can get more people sick.
All that is part of that conversation, he
wants you to think, Just take this and
you're doing part. Meanwhile, people that didn't are
the ones that are actually keeping you safe.
And it's very concerning that our vaccination rates
and our vaccine process
is being attacked. Yeah. I'm sure it's concerning
to him because his money's is going. I
mean, I... Let's not forget these people have
lobbyists whether it's Apa pack and conversation or
big pharma in a thousand different ways that
influence what they say.
Now as I said, because this is absurd,
Like, it's a cartoon. What he just did?
Is effect?
Miss or uninformed or compromised.
You guys decide for yourselves, but it's pretty
shocking. Isn't it? After even we just went
over the telegraph,
just wrote an article saying this may be
the cause for excess death. And here he
is just pushing the complete opposite narrative.
Here's another clip. Ka, It says when you
realize the so called anti baxter were right
all along. This is Ar En annette Ba
worth d,
I'll just for you. She talks about the
spike proteins are not supposed to be inside
us. Oh, yeah, This is the. I, it's
amazing that some people are still
actually arguing the basic original narrative. It stays
in your shoulder muscle it only produces run.
I mean, even the red cross still to
the stay. Argues that It doesn't enter your
bloodstream. You know, despite old peer reviewed science
that literally signs it going in your bloodstream
or the endless amount of now that show
it all over every organ.
But the right cross is better. Right? Because
they're clearly compromised.
As you look at some of the
the the images from people who have
auto
from death due to my,
I wonder if this is... Yeah. Here we
go. This spike proteins are found in the
cells of all human
heart cells
with spike proteins
inside
the muscles of these of these patients.
Again,
spike proteins are not supposed to be inside
us at all.
The people who had who had Covid
didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac
tissues.
The people who have... It could just be
because it wasn't Covid all or something completely
else or something else.
But it's important if you think about
Let's just assume you think it is israel
real and you think that's what's happening. So
the very thing they're telling you is super
dangerous, they have to get the shot to
protect you from wasn't doing the dangerous thing
the shot was doing. Which is putting the
spike protein, the most dangerous part inside your
body all over your body. In fact, producing
instructions
delivering them to turn your body into a
factory that produces those spike proteins.
How is? I mean, it's... It's actually the
most simple thing in the world, just that
1 part to think about. If the spike
protein is dangerous, which even the Salt institute
showed you, and Bring it up next.
As actually circuit circular or
Oh, I'll I think it's... I don't, Off
top. I remember the name of the actual
journal to put it out. But the despite
Protein itself is dangerous. It's cy and it
can get you sick, and it's the it's
the most dangerous part. I mean, I guess
that's part... You know, who knows if the
Mrna and so on, but they're dangerous.
And the
actual illness didn't even do that. And you're
giving me something that makes your body completely
pump these things out on a regular basis.
I mean, it's that's 1 of the most
obvious things in the world to see.
And I think this was
we grab that really quickly. This is just
something I you remember. I play this many
times. I remember... I played this clip before
the Covid 19 illusion,
right in the beginning because this is a
Forbes article I think or at least a
clip with a Pfizer lab guy in the
back.
Literally telling you what they were all super
sci excited about.
Wall Street and biotechnology companies have been very
excited about this idea. And what essentially it
is is trying to
pack the cells
in the body in order to make them
into drug fat. 2 weeks.
So we're gonna pretend like it was a
Whoops seat.
Literally they're going. We're super excited about making
your body produce these things, and then they
go, no, It won't go there and it
won't produce them. Or that's what they were
trying to do and they lied about it.
I mean, it's it's... This is why it
was the most obvious thing in the world.
The
vaccinations.
The ones who had this messenger Rna that
made a protein, and then they made the
protein and didn't have the off button.
Well,
they're now found at autopsy
in the cells
of cardiac tissues. And here are the Mean,
that sounds ridiculous. It sounds like something I
wouldn't even believe. Until you start looking at
the auto and wondering, hey,
what part in this did I play?
And see, what an interesting statement? Because that's
the hardest part about the the controlled medical
society. Right? That they just adhere to what
their their authorities say? It's like anything else.
And the point is that why would that
set... Why would you why would anybody go?
That's crazy.
It's perfectly scientifically possible. And obviously there... I
mean, it just... It comes down to the
idea that you reject what your pre conditioned
to think is somehow out side the, the,
you know, in the realm of conspiracy. That's
what the whole term was created for. For
you to to just in your mind dismiss
things they didn't want you to talk about.
And yet, Jay, is she sent herself. Right?
If I... Before this, she probably... Or any
number of these doctors who open their mind
to the Covid 19 risk in the or
rather the shot and around and things around
that. And
in the first... Like, when this first started,
were then
unable to acknowledge other things that were a
peripheral to the conversation, but they've... Like like
Pierre cor and the other vaccine conversation. Right?
But it broaden out. But we all have
these blocks. It's not in the pack on
her anybody else. We all have those because
they're pre conditioned to think x y and
z. You're not supposed to think. Or rather
that... That's what dumb people think or this
is only what smart people think and you
follow those traps where you tell yourself well
I'm not. That's what I am. So I'm
not gonna believe that. It's a trick.
Consider everything all the time while questioning it
equally. It's very simple.
And
how do you... First of, how do you
say I'm sorry to all of you that
I've been putting comments in my videos for,
like, a year. Take a look at this.
Take a look at this. And I said,
okay. They're just chirping again.
And my good friend Colonel A, who told
me from the very beginning. Be careful. Be
careful. Look what's happening. This is sneaky. Why
are they holding this back?
And he questioned everything. Now he questions everything.
So it's like the boy who cries wolf
for that I should have been paying attention
when he cried Wolf for this time.
How would you... I mean, see this a
little infuriating to me? Let me, clearly, she
was,
I mean, you know, I find hard to
believe that anybody with brain could have not
seen this as, you know, early, early. The
facts were roll there. So becomes a will
fully ignorant situation. Even you don't realize you're
doing it. But my point is, what do
you mean? Questioning everything compared with the Bo
Christ wolf, Like this is how it's crazy
to me that we're in position where the
idea that questioning
everything, including from people you trust and authorities
is somehow could perceived as crazy.
Or or the boy your cries wolf. It's
not that you deny anything. You question everything
and consider all of them. It's just about
due diligence, guys. And these are doctors and
scientists who are pushing back on the idea
of questioning everything. I'm not talking about her.
In a broad sense. We saw a lot
of that.
I just don't know where that block comes
in. It seems counterintuitive intuitive to what they
pretend they are. But shame on me
when there were
places that this
information was more readily available. So good for
her. Right? I'm good for her. I mean,
just because I overlap that with criticism. I
wasn't directed at her. I mean, even if
she was missing this. The fact that she's
now come around to state that. That takes
courage to be able to admit that. Many
of them still fail to do that. You
can go to Scott Adams route and just
be like, you're wrong, even though I was,
you know, that whole thing, where I'm right
even though I was wrong kinda game.
But that's important. Spike protein all throughout your
body. I mean, this is the obvious self
evident, objective, pro reality, and we're still going
forward.
It's pretty alarming. Now here all the red
cross point just because I still think that's
mind blowing as of September 20 22.
We don't label them because it does not
enter your bloodstream. And I pull I posted
this all the way back in January 20
23, and I come in here every time
I talk about and with it again. And
this 1 that I did the same thing,
and all these studies clearly show that it
does stay gets detected in the heart. This
was the earliest 1 it says it stays
up to 28 days in your blood.
I mean, there's no other conclusion that they're
dishonest. They know this and they're hiding it
for whatever reason.
Called them out. That's disgusting, and they're hurting
people by not talking about that.
Oh, did I include. Hold on. Make sure
I put it note in the show notes.
Alright. And then, of course, we have an
important development on this side. I think what's
worth mentioning at least.
Daily mayo highlights that... And you guys have
seen the fauci. I mean, you know, I
think there's... As I said, on A wake
up, I think. There was good things that
came out of Fauci talking about this in
Congress.
That some of that did reach new people
what to think is good, but I... It
all these always feel like manipulation to me.
What's gonna happen? Do you think he's gonna
get trouble? You he's gonna go to Jail?
I highly doubt it. These things seem like
release valve. They seem like things to put
to the bed. So, yeah, we made him
look bad. So is that over now?
And, usually, it's all a bunch a half
truths and and, you know, lacking source material
as usual.
But this says doctor Anthony Fauci confess. He
quote made up Covid rules, which
Obviously,
we proved that in the very beginning along
with a lot of people are taking the
arbitrary, like the psychological
manipulation conversation coming from know, the way that
they would psychologically, like, 1 guantanamo Bay type
of stuff.
Isolation, like, that's what this really lot aligned
with. There wasn't any real scientific background. Why
6 feet. We talked about this. A lot
of us did.
But here's the problem 1. Just because it's
true does not mean that that statement is
accurate because it doesn't appear to be. Which
I think is part of the manipulation. And
this whole game we play that, well, he
didn't really say that. We know it's true.
So just why you're attacking it. Like, we
can acknowledge that these things accurate without saying
it's okay for them to state this in
a way that's a dishonest or completely falls.
This is my problem with this. Is this
this is the 2 party paradigm of stuff,
And you... If you... If you're defending the
idea that they should state this even though
it's not actually what was stated, not exactly
or put it in quotes even though we
didn't say that, the problem is that that
creates the allowance to be frivolous with the
facts as long as it aligns is what
you think, and that is a 2 party
illusion thing, and guess what, You're acting just
like the corporate media, let that sink in.
The point is as this person says, and
I'm not on this person with his Ukraine
flag is not somebody On supporting. Anybody goes,
he actually didn't say that. The article you
link doesn't say he said that.
And sadly, if you look at the actual
breakdown, it doesn't appear that he did.
What he did say when he when he
claimed seems to completely ins that and even
though either way, that is the truth.
They they completely arbitrarily made up most of
this stuff. But here's what it actually says
and the breakdown saying,
the... The messaging was about 6 foot is
6... Foot distancing, and the distance need to
be. He goes, you know, I don't recall.
Asked whether where it came from for studies.
It goes, it's sort of just appeared.
I don't recall, like, a discussion of whether
should be 5 or 6 or whatever. It
it was just that 6 foot and, you
know, kinda like this clearly admitting that it
was arbitrary, guys.
But this first person goes, I don't care
whether it said verbatim or not. I have
a problem with that. You should care about
that.
It matters.
Because just because it aligns with what you
think, this is a... This is like the
Twitter files game. Guys, we're following you these
traps, which allow you to
ignore the important parts of this.
If it's quoted, then he did well better
have said it. That's a corporate platform. And
need to point this this a problem. So
I think this is a subtle thing. Many
people probably disagree with me. But we need
to be careful we fall on these traps
we're we're con complaining things. And well, on
top of that, it becomes an easy thing
to dismiss to people that don't want to
see it because they go well, if Not
what he said.
But it goes just it it goes,
it did say, quote, just an empirical decision
that wasn't based on data or even that
data could be accomplished.
Right? So it's like that, it is the
reality.
But what he's saying there is not necessarily
that it was... Even mean, it... It's not
important to get into the details of it
all. The point is like, to breakdown what
he meant by because I don't ultimately know
what the game they're playing. The point is
they lied about this. We know that these
things were arbitrarily made up and it wasn't
based on science.
But to claim he said he made it
up, and that gets what gets spread, people
like memes about it with quotes,
you're getting tricked.
But it goes just as bad, maybe even
worse. Wasn't based on data, Yeah. I agree
that it's similar and the point is the
same direction. But all of us, if we
care about the truth, should not be going
whatever as long as it goes in the
right direction, that's 2 party paradigm stuff. The
rep, the left and the right and people
are falling for it.
I'm so down here goes, so we didn't
make it up. You so my point this
guy just, you know,
just desperate to make Fauci not the bad
guy. But that's the point. That's how that
works.
Not that we should care about these manipulating
people. But overall, what we need to care
about is the facts.
Not the screenshot from Twitter and assume that
the great guy said it, but knowing the
facts and understanding it proving it. So I
think of deliberate. Guys that really do. I
think it's about trapping us. By beginning into
the breakthrough conversation, which is also a big
part of this.
Because it honestly, it seems at the moment
to be the most
likely,
hype, directional over the next 1 to be
kind... If that's the way you think it's
gonna go. But Toby Rogers point out something
important, and I'll go to the actual article.
He goes the dude who supposedly died of
bird flu in Mexico,
had chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes,
and quote, had no history of exposure to
poultry.
She goes, oh, so basically, they made up
the bird flu part because of course, they
did. And he goes, oh, and he died
6 weeks ago, but they're just telling us
now. This all true I'll show you next,
which is ridiculous.
And of course, Chris Martin says, a cycle
threshold of 57 presumably. If you remember the
conversation there, the point is that cycle threshold
of 40 above or even 30 something above
was guaranteed to be right with false positives.
That's why when they did the first testing,
it was, like, an average of 40 to
40 plus.
And then when they did the post
vaccination Pcr testing, it have magically dropped down
a 28, which we proved and nobody wants
to talk about, because that proved to you
that they were trying to change the way
the outcome was to you using the cycle
threshold to make this post vaccination ones look
like they were better than the ones before.
Even though it was all arbitrary and manipulative.
But here's the actual start article from Reuters.
This is from June fifth, the person with
bird flu died in Mexico.
Who says.
Now, again, first point, Died in April so
strange that now it's coming out, I think
it's because it's aligning up with the rest
of the conversation.
But it says scientist said the case is
related to an outbreak of h 5 and
1 bird flu that has so far infected
3 dairy farm workers
related to... Or so say it's unrelated to,
excuse me. So this is the first point
that I think is interesting. And that keep
making this argument. So Were to believe this
is something that is magically changing in the
same ways in the same in different. Like,
we're we're told throughout Covid Right? This some
kind of a unique thing, even though it
seemed to all of a sudden happen like
every 30 seconds.
But the idea that this is changing
in the same way to infect another animal
at the same time at different parts in
the world They're unrelated.
I mean, how much of this are we
supposed to just take on on on on
credit here, guys. This doesn't make sense. And
the idea that this has already spread 2
humans from animals in multiple cases around the
world, but then doesn't change from there. Doesn't
infect other humans. That's either not happening or
it's not dangerous.
And it says Mexico's health ministry also said
in the statement the source of infection had
not been identified.
So we don't know where it came from.
He died in April, the victim had no
history of exposure to poultry or other animals,
but had multiple underlying medical conditions.
And has been bedridden written for weeks.
Better. Bedridden written.
And it goes on to say as he
highlighted,
For other reasons prior to the onset of
acute symptoms. He says he has
chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.
Okay. So you can easily see that you
can give this guy a Pcr test and
you're like, oh, he has the thing that
we're testing for
and ignore all the other that. Come on.
Certainly could be the case. Either way, the
idea that they're h all of this around
the idea of bird flu
while this... While all over the world we
have these these... Like, examples of from bird
mind you. That's now suddenly infecting cows.
And in a dairy farm area, it's infected
a couple of humans, but it didn't spread
from there. Like, I mean, I've talked to
epidemiologist more than enough throughout a Covid 19
conversation to understand that this doesn't overall for
that matter, This doesn't make sense.
This is about... And the only thing you
of course, you go stand back and go
well, maybe it's new thing that's changing and
acting differently. Certainly possible,
or if you're gonna, you know, treasuries the
whole thing, how about the fact that they're
using a Pcr test to test where they
want to and finding what they want. When
they look they find it and what do
you know?
I guarantee you right now if you just
pet Pcr tested everywhere you'd fought suddenly be
like, a bird flu pandemic.
That's what we're seeing.
Now here's an interesting overlap to this. Great
game India highlights in the lengthy report, Ron
Fu, Phd, I believe that's how pronounced. Like,
I'm, I've never pronounced it out loud before,
but looks like it. Of,
Era sum Medical Center in the Netherlands,
describe how they used a combination of genetic
engineering and serial infection of ferrets
to create a mutant H51
virus that can spread among ferrets without direct
contact.
Oh, 2012.
Gee, I wonder if that might be related.
Certainly possible or the idea that they just
genetically engineer or gain function everything they're dealing
with and the point is these things were
created.
Doesn't mean it's the same thing, but we
can ask that question, but here's a Peter
Highlights.
If bird flu starts spreading human to human,
and Ap posted this as of June first.
You can thank these 2 gain a function
researchers for their financial sponsors.
And their sponsors. They have been working on
it for years.
So, of course, you could argue and this
professor
Ron Fu, the same guy she just highlighted
from 2012.
Yoshi hero,
k K, for 8 phd.
Of course, you could argue that it's just
coincidental,
or we can argue that this is another
thing they're playing with. That could be an
accident in that case once that further that
got leased on accident or they could be
used or could... I mean, the point is
how are we still allowing this?
Playing with things just like they highlighted here.
Now this is for 2012, but it's still
happening.
If you're looking at the dates on these
these reports, guys.
We're talking about gain of function research to
make this thing more dangerous to do what?
To make something to protect you from that.
Should that
1 in a billion chance, the same thing
happen elsewhere.
That's... I mean, what the likelihood that that
would be the very thing if it's even...
I mean, it's the same
conversation.
The bottom line is we should not be
allowing gain a function research like this.
Even of their own admission that these things
is the leaks and the risks and so
on.
How to blows your mind? Does that this
is even still happening. And the people like
Doctor. Peter Are highlighting. Look, if this happens,
look to these people right here who are
working on making this thing a dangerous
and human human spread.
Doctor Claire Craig highlights,
and this is actually pretty ridiculous to me.
I I I'm convinced that Burke here and
the rest of them are just playing their
roles. I mean, the way that she came
out at the right time and made different
arguments that seemed to put her as, like,
the truth teller, Now she here she is
doing... Well guess what?
Test every cow in the country. What do
you think the find? Exactly what I just
said. Doctor
Claire Craig highlights ph hunting, which I agree
with will lead to novel virus as panic
panic and harm, testing
asymptomatic cows is Luna.
You're just doing the same game.
Influenza like Sars 2 is airborne and travels
long distance, she says slaughtering healthy cows won't
change that.
Jordan Sac highlights, doctor Deborah Bi say we
must test every cow in America on a
weekly basis. For bird flu,
Why wouldn't we test birds?
Like this don't take... I mean, none of
this makes any logical sense, and it's not
just because I don't understand it. If you
break this down in the historical understanding is
than what we were taught and what we've
said even during Covid, this doesn't line up.
We're not testing to really see how many
people have been exposed and got symptomatic infected.
We should be testing every cow weekly. You
can do pool Pcr. We have the technology.
We're... The great thing about Americas is we're
incredibly innovative. And we have the ability to
have these breakthroughs.
We could be pool testing every dairy worker.
I do believe that pool testing every dairy
worker.
Right? With with Pcr tests. Didn't we just
go over this? They know what they're doing,
guys that guarantee you, they know about the
issue. That's why they play with the Pcr
cycle threshold? But there's
undetected cases in humans.
Because we're once again only tracking people with
with symptoms. When we did that with Covid,
the virus spread throughout the northeast on undetected
because it took a long time to get
to the vulnerable
individuals But in the meantime, thousands, hundreds of
thousands of people were infected with asymptomatic or
mild disease and never came to medical attention.
We have to switch from symptoms
to actually definitive laboratory testing. We have the
capacity... Of course. It sounds like it might
be logic. Right? We can't just go off
symptoms. Well we never should have just gone
off symptoms. That's absurd. The game they played
that was it was just so dangerous we
couldn't we couldn't risk it. Well, it wasn't
and they knew that. They lied.
But the idea that all they're doing is
using that truth to push you into another
manipulation. Will be gotta just test everybody. Well,
they tried that during Covid as well. It
was always not the right answer. You don't
just test everybody all the time. You're gonna
find what you're looking for,
especially with a Pcr test.
This is concerning in so many different ways.
Because they're they're c creating the the the
discussion
that could lead you right back into the
same manipulation. So even even overlapping with a
symptomatic lie,
Not the fact that mean, I look, I
I genuinely only questioned whether that's even a
real thing today based on what we went
through, but the science studies in the the
peer reviewed evidence showed that that was near
nonexistent existent. There was a 10000000 person study
that showed there was basically 0 asymptomatic in
the Cobra
conversation of Covid 19.
But, I mean, my point is even then
Like, okay, let's have ask ourselves. It even...
Like, I'm not saying that you couldn't be
somehow a carrier for something without being sick.
But the idea that you can be sick
to the point of spreading something
without actually being shown to... That doesn't make
any sense is certainly possible. I would argue.
But Ben realized that respiratory viruses if we
believe that,
even Fauci would tell you spread by symptoms.
So the idea that if you're somehow spreading
a respiratory virus valve symptom, this... All of
these things counter
add up to being inconsistent at the very
least.
Now I'm gonna show you this again. I
haven't talked about a long time. I'm just
recognizing that in 2011,
even the Who is calling out the same
thing they're doing now.
The title of it was health is more
than influenza.
And it simply says the repeated pandemic health
scares caused by guess what?
H5N1,
the same thing they're doing now,
and H11
are part of a culture of fear. Oh,
would you look at that?
It says worst case thinking or placed balanced
risk assessment.
And it says, of course, they led to
the precautionary stocking of largely useless antiviral and
irrational vaccine policies
Yeah. And it's crazy to W general. Right?
Of, these people are no longer part of
that and new the new ga is in
place.
But it says in both pandemics of fear
The exaggerated claims of severe public health threats
stem primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts
like perks like fauci,
in the highly competitive market of health governance
the struggle for attention, budgets and grants, fierce,
The pharmaceutical industry and the media only react
to this welcome boone.
Yeah.
Yeah. I'm seen this Probably going. The point
is this is I've talked about this a
thousand times.
Other points in this were
saying such a... Where was the main point?
Resources are scarce need to be alone.
Disease, experts wish to capture public attention, and
sway resource allocation decisions in favor of the
disease of their interest.
Now the point is I also... Or on
top of this is that we also... I
won't get into now just for time, but
the Hhs
around the same time, they made the same
point, which highlighted the fact that they literally
laid out the idea, we're not selling enough
vaccines. How do we do that? Well we
hype the fear. And this is basically what
they set out loud under the guys that
most of them probably thought it was in
the best interest of you
But the point was that we could prove
that it was dishonest. They knew it wasn't
overall,
everybody at the time was highlighting this were
a large elements of it and just got
ignored.
So now after all that, here's Finland now
offering the bird flu vaccine need to select
groups of people.
A global first.
So right now, while we're bare... Like, this
is
benign based on everything we're seeing, and even
knowing that they already hype this before, pandemics
of fear, and we know it's happening again
for whatever reason. The idea that they're gonna
offer this at a time when it's not
even happening,
is... That's 1 of the reasons why I
wanna talk about this today because that does
concern me. This is from June fifth.
Finland to offer bird flu vaccine to select
groups of people. It says Finland is preparing
to offer vaccines to people at risk of
exposure to Avian influenza strain spreading among farmland
wild animals. Health officials they're are set. Well,
it's not really spreading. And so there's been
a few infections were told based on Pcr
tests,
potentially becoming first country to take such a
step.
As concerns about the threat,
intensify.
Or rather your propaganda increases, it says the
vaccine campaign will be limited with doses set
to be available to groups including poultry farmers,
veterinarian veterinarians, scientists who study the virus,
and people who work on fur how farm
housing animals like Make fox.
If you again, the idea just animals in
general,
seems like a strange thing. I... I'm we're
actually on Guard right now. And if you
see it let me know, for the for
the push to use a self spreading concept
for this. Because remember, the original concept was
about animals.
And if if you haven't seen it, we've
talked endlessly even the Who and the rest
of them very very clearly, I've talked about
self spreading vaccines for humans.
My point is that animal conversation is a
way to kinda get that moving, and they've
already been talking about that going back to
even the bats. Don't forget that
I'm forgetting his name.
Hold on.
Ralph Barr.
Eat from North Carolina east university of Chapel
Hill.
I'll grab the other 1 since I brought
it up.
So the point was
in the first discussion of this, I asked
the question.
Or just pointed out Us funded research on
quote, coronavirus induced my.
Which is it's right out of Ralph Paris
research from North Carolina University Chapel Hill. It's
in nineties forward. Are you working on rabbits
that spreading
corona... I mean, spreading coronavirus that caused my.
I mean, about how ridiculous status.
Easy to look up, it's directly from his
own research,
And directly from his own, what do he...
What's it called?
Of course, now I have to look for
it and I have to find it.
Where was it?
Shoot. Is this 1?
Yes.
It's it's from his own curriculum
Ralph Barr.
Coronavirus induced my in rabbits.
Right? I mean, it'll let a bunch of
them in there.
So the point is I talked about that,
and then the next show, we went even
further. Did the Us government work on my
diet inducing virus? The answer is yes, and
then worked e aerosol it. The answer is
yes.
It's all on their own documentation. They they
made this to induce coronavirus or my,
then they've released it in the in the
caves with bats in China.
And in fact, mate it turned it into
a cell vaccine.
You can look it up for yourself. I
talked about it.
Plenty of times.
So back to that point,
I'm worry that that will be the next
discussion to be like, okay. Let's discuss this
for these animals because, oh, my god. It's
spreading. And I I don't I think there's
much less of an overlap realize.
But it says waiting for 20000 doses to
arrive in Finland, but plan to administer to
them as soon as the vaccines are in
the country.
So the question is is that offered?
Right? If you're working in these farms, they're
gonna mandate this for them? I mean, we've
already seen that door opened, if the argument
is we're rushing these in to get them
to people, what... Why would they do that
if it's gonna be like here? You can
have if you want. Seems like sort of
a government thing. Says the decision to start
providing vaccines reflects fears that people in close
contact with infected animals could contract H51
virus themselves.
Which I don't know why that makes sense
if we're talking about something that has not
seen any human to human transmission, but it
says the virus is for now not particularly
a adept at infecting humans.
Now what does that even mean? If it
can, then can. What this game they're playing
where it comes from the animal to or
the bird to the to the human and
then it stops there to me? That's a
false scenario. That's flu that's contested with Pcr
that says you got the thing.
That's what I'm worried about anyway. Because, I
mean, I'm not there. I don't know. But
the reality being,
the logic of how it spreads doesn't make
sense it stop there.
But it says, but scientists worry that as
the virus infects more mammal million species,
which again in of itself doesn't make sense
that it just jumps from all these different
animals. It's as end if it is... It
encounters more human cells
than the higher the chances that it evolves
to become more of a threat to people.
Now if you believe the idea of how
these things change and the idea that doctor
yi plenty of others argue that takes a
long time for that to actually have, not
just a couple of days or a couple
of weeks like we saw during Covid 19.
The finnish campaign also comes as the Us
based an H hiv then when outbreak they
claim among gary cattle. Previously, a species scientist
thought weren't susceptible to the virus.
But apparently, the Pcr says the Pcr test
says otherwise. 3 dairy workers have had confirmed
infections based on Pcr test I wouldn't call
that confirmed. And although the infections were all
mild and there were no signs of former
transmission to other people, the cases underscored the
risk to people who have gone. What do
we... What do mean? What risk?
Did They die? No?
They spread? No. So what are we even
talking about?
Other countries are discussed it's all about typing
the thing, guys. It's typing the new... There's
a business around this.
Other countries are discussing deploying h 5 vaccines
or are working to secure supplies. The Us
for example, last week hired Cs
seek
seek c,
si,
to build up the number of h 5
flu vaccine doses it has available. The United
States.
But Finland was the first country he knew
that actually plan to use them.
Now it says the vaccine is to be
administered in Finland is designed off a different
Avian
influenza virus called H5N8...
I'm sorry. I think I said h 8
and 1H5N8.
Yeah. But researchers said the shot should still
confer protection. Again against Stage 5 everyone. Oh,
shoot it. I got... I've glad we're guessing.
This is so stupid why would... Okay. If
the argument is we need this, why wouldn't
you just make it for the thing you're
telling us at need, this is about selling
vaccines.
At least at the moment.
HH5N8
is a different thing, at least we're being
told and realize that's the c queries we're
talking about. It's the same thing Us government
has ready to go.
Let's talk about that.
Oh here. I included those for you.
Here it is.
Excuse me. See queer.
So that's what Finland planning to use immediately
and with the Us government is already tapped
to make for them.
All this money in time that your tax
hours are going into, and I'm not saying
it should go into this, but they're making
it for all sorts of new Covid things,
while they have something they're claiming is happening,
but they're just gonna
pay for something that's a for a different
strain.
There's either just dishonest everywhere, or there's something
much darker happening behind it. So the point,
for the European Medicines agency page, let's look
at what's see queries,
actually is.
So obviously, Wanna know about the risks.
So of course, Go to this, and we
go, okay you'll see.
Full list of side effects and restrictions. Well,
see the package leaflet.
Okay. Let's click that and see what happens.
Oh,
0, it's strange. There seems to be nothing
there.
I'm not joking. It just says packaged leaflet.
Very big with nothing there. It says the
leaflet every pack and medicine that contains information.
Okay. So you're giving us a line of
information about what a package leaflet is.
That's what it's... That's what it is. The
leaflet is here in every medicine it contains
all of the information. Okay? Then why do
you say go to this link to look
at all the side effects? Isn't that the
most stupid thing in the world?
Something tells me that's not by accident, But
in any case, let's go to the actual
page that I was able to find
under Annex or this is the... Basically the
summary for
s.
Here's what I... A couple of things I
plucked out of this. To make same points.
Limitations of vaccine effectiveness
It says there is no immune correlate of
protection established for this shot.
Or rather just for influenza a caused by
h 5 subtype.
Okay. So what it says...
Yeah. So it says based on immune responses
that after 2 doses, you may not have...
They all tend to say that. That you
may not get the immune response. But remember
what we saw during in Covid 19, and
fight... And it was Fda
speaking about the pfizer shot.
We do not have a correlate of protection.
Now if you look it up, the very
phrase, what it means is proving that the
response you get correlates with a level of
protection.
So here we are again. Why are these
things even mean and if we're still... Like,
you how long this has been around?
So we still haven't figured that out, how
about because they probably don't wanna look there
because it probably doesn't show what they wanna
find. Just like with all the rest of
these big pharma drugs, they have complete immunity,
at least in some, you know, Covid across
the board, but almost all of them in
many cases.
19 86.
The point is that if there's no correlated
protection, what that means is that the response
you get from this, doesn't necessarily prove that
you're protected. They just say, well, this is
the thing we need to make to protect
you from this. Right?
And we can prove that it makes those
things. Here's our antibody response.
Okay? Does it protect you against the thing
your yourself? Well, we don't know. We soon.
Or if you go up against something else
that's out there, were you're making the antibodies
for something that's not there? Can cause an
even more dangerous response.
Antibody immune or antibody dependent enhancement and all
these different conversations. But, you know, same old
same old guys, That's my concern about why
these things are dangerous
as a whole,
but under contradiction. History of an ana galactic
life threatening reaction to the active substance.
That's a that's a good 1. So it
has a history of having a life threatening
ana antibiotic shock situation to the active substance
in the shot. Benefits that outweigh the risks,
Right? Okay. So if it's the thing that's
not killing anybody, that's not even spreading, but
here, take this thing quick because
of something that's not hurting anybody, but you
might die from this just in case?
That is your old broad. Guys understand. This
is just... Didn't see how common it is,
but it says a history of that. They
just getting... There's just a few things I
plucked out, and here's the the things I
always focus on.
Interactions with other medications. Now how is it
possible
after all this time, and how many injections
are forced on your children, everybody else that
they still don't do covid administration studies?
Which means they don't know how this will
react with the other 45 shots to give
that child.
There are no data on c administration of
this shot with any other vaccines.
So guarantee you just like with the flu
shot and coke. They're gonna say come in
and get your flu shot while you're here,
get the bird flu shot. Why not? Maybe
we'll even combine them for you.
Even though we don't know what that will
do.
Science,
benefits outweigh the risk. Okay. Fertility, pregnancy lac
asian, same damn thing.
No data are available?
Well,
all that means is they probably won't lean
into it at first, but should they'd feel
it's dangerous They'll simply go do it anyway.
Like to do with Covid 19.
They said do it. It's the safe thing
to do, and I routinely went to this
and said they don't even know if it's
safe. They say it right there. And they're
telling pregnant women to get it. And guess
what? Pregnant women were some of the most
affected in what to happened during Covid 19.
Pregnancies,
excess death, lack of boris, my god.
But it's the same damn thing in every
single conversation.
Now here
is the list of poke post marketing surveillance.
Now what I think is crazy about this,
Sorry And my throat congested,
looks lately seems to be common.
Is that they say no post marketing surveillance
data are available.
This is not a new thing. So the
point is there's... Literally would just haven't care
to do any post marketing surveillance. Now that's
not true by the way, they have pharma
individuals for all this, but they just don't
tell you.
The point is that they don't have on
the record markets of marketing surveillance. So what
do they do? They point to...
They say, well, here are, where was the
following adverse events were reported. For post marketing
surveillance with H1N1,
pandemic effects vaccine. Right? So they're simply going.
We don't even know the h 5, the
H5N8
shot that we're giving you for H1N1.
We never we never did studied after the
fact. But here are all the bad things
that happened after the H1N1 shot.
Blood and lymph fat system disorders, immune system
disorders, nervous system disorders, cardiac disorders, respiratory disorders,
gastrointestinal
disorders, skin and some
subcutaneous tissue disorders, mu
mu skeletal, connective tissue and bone disorders, general
disorders and administrative site conditions.
Now underneath those, they've got specifics. The point
is all of those are possible. And it
goes on, blood and lymph fat system disorders,
t,
see the common things that overlap with all
these shots. Neurological disorders, vas.
I mean, these are all because of these
shots.
Not how much you wanna bet that that
has all that and more and they haven't
even studied it.
All, these are
pretty much the same thing you'll find in
most of these shots. So the question is
yet again.
Is it benefit outweighs the risk with something
that they're gonna give you in Finland right
now, if you work at a dairy farm
are gonna tell you you should,
or your children based on the idea that
this is the safe thing to do.
Is it?
I hope we're asking these questions today. Now,
getting into another point before we get into
some more stuff around the real israel conversation.
I wanted to highlight that Steve pointed this
out on on or they... I think they
both pointed out on a wake up.
I really wanted to highlight this for a
second because this is a story that got
some attention. But it there's so much going
on right now. I have been on guard
for the... The words our violence game,
for a long time.
And we already see this. Domestic terrorism, the
idea is israeli related semitism. It's all the
same to hate speech. It's all the same
game. Heard to act like you say these
things, it's actual violence,
so they could put you in jail for
saying the wrong thing.
Well now in France,
It's action,
but it's in the same vein of conversation.
French authorities investigate 3 men accused of what
they're calling
psychological
violence.
That is or welding in his hell.
Now, apparently, what they did is they put
out a bunch of coffin or a few
coffin in front of the eiffel tower, sort
to make a political statement? It says they
allegedly placed conference ins scribe with French soldiers
of Ukraine. Now why is that not considered
of protest? It is or an
an artistic display.
I mean, how many things have we've seen
that are in fact, many times g task,
Right Marie Bra and these ridiculous blood soap.
Not. I mean, they'll tear they... It's art,
guys. Art.
You tell me they can't come out and
put coffin and make a political statement because
you guys don't like what they're saying, that's
the point. This is a this is a
free speech issue. They're shutting them down and
arresting them and charging with psychological violence for
doing it because they highlighted the on the
unpopular thing about the Ukraine war.
That's what it's about. Have they done this
about Russia,
able would've to let it go? How much
you wanna bet?
And that's the problem. So they call it
psychological violence.
And, of course, they... There was another term
here. I was highlighted I lost it, but
it says,
That's the main term. But there either way,
the point is about turning
the
a
setting a piece an object in front of
this eiffel tower to be not... And and
with, I mean, you could argue it by
doing so they broke a law.
Which is I disagree with, but that would
be
a minor cry. You put a coffin there.
The fact that they call it psychological
violence, they're pointing to the
immaterial. If you're just saying that action caused
me to be upset, which is violence in
its own right. You see how alarming that
is, you see how slippery that slope is
with suddenly, well, okay. Well now I'm traumatized
by that. I have actual side. So your
violence kill... You know, that becomes, like this
is
justification... Now, I mean, just, but that's their...
This is their justification to put these people
in jail, hold them accountable for what they
claim were psychologically
violent.
It terri me that this is happening, and
we need to stand up and point this
out. This cannot be allowed because this is
1 step away from saying, us saying what
Israel just did yesterday was psychologically violent.
Dangerous, guys. Pay attention to this stuff. Now
on a couple other points around this 1
segment,
there's a lot of this very slippery
alarming stuff happening. Which is not new by
any stretch of the imagination, but it's happening
more
contiguous ways.
Matt Or appoint this out. Actually highlighting what
Sam Sun paula said. He goes so I
reading this right?
Adobe Photoshop, which I don't know why I'm
anybody to use them anymore. Can't use photoshop
unless I'm okay with you having full access
to anything I create with it, including Nda
work.
Guess what? Just like with stripe and everything
else. I forgot I to make point about
that today. Updated terms of use,
saying we clarify that we base basically we
have access to anything you do.
You could read... You could read it all
for yourself.
Matt Or says you have to agree to
let Adobe quote. And this is from. Listen
to your content.
So this isn't just about photoshop. It's an
auto and video apps as well. Super creepy.
It be abused and probably on behalf of
your government. Hundred percent agree, and even called
this back in February. Saying prediction. The government's
gonna work with Adobe Premiere to spy on
dis creative.
Bow, guess what. He was right.
I mean, crazy.
What in the world? This is about everything
all the time. We're... The the problem is
guys is that your government.
Most of the governments in the world is
specifically the Us government right now for Americans.
Is desperately aware that they're losing power. They're
desperately aware that people are
increasingly... You know, look at the people being
accused of Genocide right now. Blink and Biden
like, at this point, it's 1 action 1
step away from them possibly being held accountable,
which would then cascade to a lot of
other problematic things that terri these people.
People that are typically used to be being
omni.
So
it's becoming transparent.
Everything you do, suppression? Did digital Ids access
points shutting you get spying on Adobe creator.
I mean, that's pretty alarming.
Now, I'll talk about it more in in
the... I wanna say it in the opening
of a show, but I wanna just highlight
that for those of you still supporting Tl
lab through Stripe and and gibson en go
and the rest of it. At the moment,
I'm
pretty certain that they're going to kick me
off, possibly in the next... Week or so
in the next month. But I'm... I feel
like I might have a workaround around. That
I'm trying to play. So right at the
moment If you're supporting us through those platforms,
my advice to leave it for now, And
if it comes to a point to where
I see it revoked, I'll make sure everybody
knows the yank out your subscriptions, because I
know whether they'll just keep taking the money,
not give it to. Don't know.
But just heads up, I'll I'll let you
know every step of the way, let you
know where I think it should be now
and the sad part is even those that
support this, I get it. It's frustrating, and
it just becomes like you just don't wanna
do anymore. Which is exactly what they want.
So I hope that you'll stick with us
even as they make you jump from Who
to Who to try to continue to support
us. But that's gonna continue right there.
Now 1 other small point that I just
wanted to highlight somewhere,
this is really ridiculous. And the Twitter is
over the top right now when it comes
to this kind of stuff. So I was...
In in Robert's article, which I'll show you
in a minute.
In or maybe, I mean, we're getting pretty
we're already about 2 hours.
I was highlighting a point about how... Yeah,
as we've talked about before. Orthodox Jews and
israel real good beat up by the ide
idea all the time. Showing you it's not
really about judaism.
And I wanted to use this tweet that
she has to put it in the article.
So the first thing I noticed this is
like, go here to do embed post.
And it goes, oh, there's nothing there.
And by the way, I've done that... This
is the same way wait for... I did
this get dave for yesterday or yesterday. Still
assembly now is half expecting it to be
there today Like, usual wanna go live. But
nope. Nothing. Not there. Okay. Maybe it's a
glitch. Right? So just I tried to refresh
it. I tried different browsers.
Same thing. No matter what I did.
Just doesn't show up. Right? It's a inconvenient
video for zion, showing them beating up
orthodox Jews in the street. It's pretty bad.
Look at. He's pausing on me. I'm even
hitting that. Look at it. You see that?
I'm telling you guys there's something going on.
I'm not hitting pause.
Okay. I mean, it's just couldn't be more
obvious, guys. I mean I I'm not saying
it's all... I mean, I don't know. But
I'm telling you there's something fishy going on.
And not not my other point,
now to do this really quickly.
We pull this back for a second. I'm
gonna bring up a a private window.
Show you this. So now if I take
that tweet,
and put it in a private window,
I think this is the most compelling.
You know, now after already seeing all the
glitches and the what just happening, and put
it a private window,
Doesn't exist.
What doesn't exist. Well, I just looked at
it. So I'm pretty sure, let's try to
get just to make sure.
God.
I mean, guys, that not an accident. And
by the way, if that was a glitch.
I don't... I doubt it would just continue
to be a glitch after... I mean, something
is going on.
Not Cali doesn't have her Dms opened up,
so if you wanna show where that, let
her know.
In any case, I think it's very clear
what's going on. These things are not damn.
And look at the reach on that.
And everyone is seen this lately. I've seen
the same thing I've got post that I
put out about, like... The article I'll talk
about a second about the, about Bill Maher.
Was
outstanding. It was excellent. There's a lot of
important information and even just stuff that you
might think is just middle the road for
us. It still gets a hell of a
lot more reach than what these things were
getting.
I don't think that's by accident, but I
just wanted you to see that. And it's
such a small example of some of the
much more alarming like,
actions we're seeing from Twitter right now.
So before we get into some of these
articles, Wanted want to highlight some interesting points
about
the 2 party paradigm.
So, Michael Tracy highlights something that Trump just
said. Continuing to show you that this is...
I mean, Trump... It's it's alarming as hell
to me that we're having
all of the main presidential candidates, which is
where they're gonna channel everybody into is always
blu of evils and all that nonsense are
are all, like, competing to be the most
aggressive zion,
which big surprise for those are paying attention.
Right?
But he says Trump says Israel needs to
finish the job quickly.
He says unnamed people are telling him October
seventh never happened,
just like Holocaust.
He says. He lament that the Israel lobby
is not powerful enough. Don't forget. We just
played that interview where he was arguing
that the israel that Israel had control over
the Us Congress and not anymore today. And
it's a shame. He says, and he says
it's because of biden.
There there are his supporters that just continue
to pretend like, la la la, that's not
true.
It's a public interview he did for himself
and he says it very clearly.
That the Israel should have control over the
congress. I mean, could argue miss spoke
but it was followed up and he gun
goes in, But joe biden responsible for it.
He clearly said it, guys, and this only
makes that more clear.
And it says trucks become like, a Palestinian,
just degrading and and d these people. Like,
that's a insult. Like it... It's disgusting. They're
either that stupid or that compromised. Guys, That's
the problem here.
But realize that the point about October seventh,
Is anybody or arguing doing it just didn't
happen? I'm sure it exists out there. But
all I'm trying to do is highlight the
most extreme most un statement that it was
like, all of Raj. It was all, you
know, certainly possible. With all Tv screens and
wag the dog, Guess? It didn't possible.
But is that an honest argument that's being
held in a in a legitimate way in
a, you know, an influential position. No.
The reality is there's a hell of a
lot to show you that they allowed it
to happen. But, of course, by him saying
that it waters that down as well. There's
a lot happening here. It makes some points
about after I play this clip.
Oh, number 1, Have to finish the job.
Israel to finish that job. They have to
finish it quickly strongly,
and they have to get back to
life again
because it's taking too long. They have to
finish the job
We're not.
Win at finish gotta win. Gotta win.
The attack on October seventh, and it's getting
more and more d demeanor did d meaning
it.
I have been go in, win and finish.
Get win. Gotta...
Sorry.
The attack on October seventh and it's getting
more and more d. They're d meaning it.
I have people now telling me they don't
think the attack ever happened
and take a look. You watch the news
reports have the web letters video. Sure. I
know you're doing so do it. But Oh,
yes. He's got the snuff though. He's got
the disgusting stuff fill proven to be riddled
him this information by anybody on, but Hannity.
He's got it. He's got it.
Here's the thing.
You watch these people in television.
And then there's just like you have holocaust
scenarios also. They say the Holocaust never took
It's the exact same people. They're saying it
never happened.
Ao c plus 3.
You know?
Oh, did she... I mean, oh, we're gonna
stand by that Trump. Ao is claiming out...
Did never happened.
These people are just patent liars, guy. They're
just coming out saying, what needs to be
said for the agenda? Now, clearly, he... What
they'll argue is. That's not what he said.
Do you know damn well. That's what he
was ins and he clearly said that and
Ao.
It's just a people who want that to
be the point is the the the liar
who defend the liar will lie for him.
And that's not what he meant.
Trump is an expert at saying things right
down the middle. That's not down the middle.
But a point as he ins that and
leaves it kind of open so you can,
deny deny deny The point is that he's
pretending a large part of the conversation, mostly
people that call out Israel's crimes are pretending
October seventh never happened. What what you're doing
is burying the hannibal directive, the fact that
they knew a lot about it. I mean,
there's it's
pretty g task when you realize what they're
doing. While he gas lights for the story.
Israel was the most powerful
lobby
in the country, 15 years ago. Oh, don't
you mean Apa pac Trump, not Israel as
a foreign country? Oops?
Today between Tl lead and Ao and all
of these people what they're doing.
Israel,
they don't have the back end that they
once had. You're. Yeah. You got it. So
Israel doesn't control congress like it used to.
Oh, what a shame?
They'll give it to them. The I have
the... I'm good.
I'm good, but they don't have the backing.
Even Israel.
They don't have the back end that they
once had, you'll give it to them. It
says you'll get it to them.
Okay. So if for understanding the breakdown of
what's actually being said. Hannity pushes him to
give them back that power.
I mean, does do her pulp agree with
that?
I I mean, this is crazy to me.
That This is being publicly discussed at a
time when people are more aware of what
they're actually doing, and I'm talking about Apa
pack and lobbying, ph half of a foreign
country.
Even he just said Israel.
Not israel, I mean, he didn't say on
behalf of Israeli interests, He said Israel's lobby.
That's not supposed to be legal, guys? Yeah.
I have... I'm good.
I'm good, but they don't have the backing
in. Even
Schumer has become like a Palestinian.
Chuck Schumer, Jewish. You know why? Because he
dared to briefly
barely
step out of line and say that's not
going. They shouldn't be doing that. And then
he felt right back in line, but that's
the point because they eat the people alive
that step out of line barely.
Meanwhile, there's plenty of congress people out there.
There are at least some of them anyway.
They're saying, like, again, I don't necessarily believe
they mean all this, but saying the thing
that we're saying.
And they go after to them too, but
realize how aggressively more so than anything, but
they go after the person that bear because
they're trying to send a message. Schumer is
a is aggressively supporting israel, and that's how
they talk about him.
Always was strong for. He's become like a
Palestinian
all for elections in the mental oval war.
Yeah. It's a it's a very bad thing.
It's a very sad thing, and it's a...
How dare we let them pick, you know,
choose their own representatives.
He said it twice by the way, like
a Palestinian.
Look that it doesn't matter what you can
get the point is that the only way
that makes sense to you if you somehow
decide the Palestinians are lesser than.
Which I'm sure Plenty of you do, which
you're disgusting, and you should think about that.
Very dangerous thing. But if you look so
many people. I watch on your show where
they're going and interviewing these people that are
protesting just recently at Columbia in the different
places. They say, we don't believe October seventh
ever happened. Nope.
I've never heard that in any of these
protests. In fact, most of them are highlighting
the fact that it was an active resistance.
So is he just making that up? Probably,
Ask yourself why and where is it coming
from?
And
they may believe that, You know, they may
actually believe that. But they have to get
the job done. They have to get in
there and they have to get it done.
Oh. Yeah. So just keep killing children. Get
it done. Netanyahu yahoo is on your side.
I mean, I asked just I'm I'm unreal.
The point is I bet you he doesn't
even know whether it's real or not. Somebody
handed him some talking points the people that
given the, you know, lobbyists or influential people
or people who he thinks he's supposed to
try. That's Donald trump for you. Right? Look
at his last cabinet. How'd that work out?
Gotta have the insiders close to you. Right?
I know 1 of their were enemies the
Trump crowd because they were enemies to begin
with. They're bad people, guys. He brought in
the worst of the worst, like bolton and
Pompeo. And guess what? People like that and
Nikki Haley are right back in line within
they're about to become his next cabinet.
Hope we can pay attention this time.
Sadly, I think the 2 party paradigm is
just as influential right now.
But this simply highlights. I don't even know
of anyone saying October 7 never happened. I
mean I actually agree. I'm not sure it
exists somewhere.
Qa on and something like that. But my
point is that I don't see anybody after
actually saying that. And the point to get
all the... Well, actually, they do include the
cradle and so on.
My point Was gonna say, I thought it
was all corporate media stuff, but it I
actually think most people understand that there was...
I mean, actions took place It was about
lying about what happened, hiding that you were
aware of it or allowing it in some
way. He says, I've heard I've heard many,
including Israeli Media saying that there was a
deliberate security lapse
even Israeli media,
but by highlighting it what he says, the
way Trump does,
seemingly trying to bury all that.
And goes, I know money believe Palestinians have
the right to arm resistance per international law.
What do I believe. I it's so stupid.
That's just the law man. You have to
believe it. It is the reality. It says,
but I don't know what the f pack
suck in the soul is talking about here.
But just in case, you haven't seen it,
here's a great breakdown for truth and media
from Ben 1 that highlights 10 days before
October seventh, and again, 3 days before, Egypt's
intelligence officials repeatedly weren't as real about what
was about to happen. And it goes back
months before that even. Her covered this. But
let's let Trump pretend like, it's all luna,
focus on his his conspiracy theories. Right? I
don't even mean that in the sense like
the corporate media does. The point is everybody
has theories about things that are going on
and Trump just wants you to look in
the direction he's pointing.
But guess why you shouldn't.
Trump is desperate for Miriam Adams and cash.
Her rights,
her condition,
West Pink annexation. Well, guess what? Trump doesn't
care about that. He gave them the Golden
in Heights. He gave them Jerusalem even though
both of are illegal and he wasn't allowed
to do so, this is only going to
happen because they need that money.
Both sides of this, Biden and Trump are
aggressively backed by are back
by aggressive zion. People that are mindless in
the interest of Israel. They openly tell you
everything we do is in the interest of
Israel's policy and here they are equally supporting
your 2 main candidates.
I hope that makes you uncomfortable if you
have a brain, it should.
Why that's okay for anybody, should... I mean,
it's credible to me. If somehow you thinking
they're both Chinese backing, if that makes you
feel that's how you should feel about anybody
that's outside of this country. Supporting, funding, driving
into power, to people that act for their
interest, that should blow your mind.
That's what this is.
Now, Tracy also highlights Nikki Haley arriving in
Israel apparently on Ad
jet.
He goes well, well, are you look at
that? Nikki Haley apparently flew Israel for her
big quasi official visit on 1 of Ad
private jets? What a surprise. Just as Mary
Allison announced her a hundred plus million campaigns
spend on Trump.
Now I'm talking to Trump supporters Don't think
the I'm... It's already happening as far as
I can tell.
These people are not on your side. Nikki
Haley is a cartoon ish version of an
old neo con and yet She's about to
be in Trump's Ga.
Aaron Mo highlights what Biden said with the
time Magazine interview. Asked by Time Magazine, if
he thinks that quote, Netanyahu is prolong the
war for his own political cell preservation, Biden
responds, quote, there is every reason for people
to that conclusion.
It's a pretty weak answer, but the truth
is that's always been the case and Her
has written about this for years,
well before October seventh.
He says, so why is Biden funding arming
and enabling that netanyahu Is was prolong of
the war?
I it's probably just an accident. I mean,
trying to make a middle of the road
statement, but Biden saying that really does put
himself in a bad position. Hopefully they go
to jail for it. The point is that
you're
arming an entity that is even by your
own admission doing so for nothing but his
own benefit.
So that's Biden side of this another point.
This is from
Byron York. I mean, we should all laugh
out loud about this.
Biden Harris,
Donald Trump confirms plans to jail opponents.
As they write,
shouldn't there be even the tiniest bit of
self awareness here, just a little...
No look, guys, If you believe only 1
side is manipulating in the game or lying
about this or faking that and you're just
it's... You're... The 2 party every single 1
of them are doing the same things. What's
hilarious to me is they are shockingly un
lacking self awareness.
The like, the idea that you could argue
by saying this or they're just trying to
kind of cover up the fact that they're
politically going after their own trump in obvious
ways.
Or that they're trying to put them in
jail in obvious ways before the... Which I
don't think is actually about trying to stop
him from running. I don't think that's what's
happening. But either way,
or they just put this out and don't
realize how embarrassing that looks.
I just think they're all this bad. But
I think it's hilarious say its it's own
right.
He confirmed to do the thing We're trying
to do first.
Well, here's the White House in the same
vein of just being wildly dishonest and
lacking self awareness in framing yourself as the
thing that you're not. They say 80 years
ago, American and Allied forces storm the shores
of Normandy and bravely fought to defend us
again tyranny and peer evil and then absorbed
all the parts that we didn't like.
Is that how that worked? We stopped him
and we absorbed them all.
Offers paper clip, Doctor From Japan. Yeah. That's
what they did. Guys, look it up.
They brought in the worst parts of both
sides to themselves, the government, not the country,
but it definitely became a part of that.
But that's them, we defend it against them
and we took it all. Was yesterday, we
honor service members who saved the world and
sacrificed for a Liberty and prosperity. Now, it
does the sixth today.
Point is... Or was that the... Yeah. Was
6. The point is
I always say this.
The people that thought
in most every case, I've argued did so
under the illusion they were fighting for freedom.
So you should still be able to to,
you know,
honor them for the sacrifice that they thought
they were making.
The reality is a lot different. The way
that we're talking about World war 2 or
anything else. That may be even challenging for
some to think about. The point is if
you understand the true dynamics of World war
2 it wasn't as simple as good evil
just really was not. You can show that
there were leading entities both in the Uk
and the United States that were actively funding
and participating on both sides of the war
That goes to the government too. There's a
lot more than we get... That's a whole
conversation. We've talked about in debt before.
The point is what Ti says. Correction,
80 years ago, and now, you could disagree
even with this opening statement. American and allies
forces storm in the shores of Normandy and
Bravely fought to defend. Well I guess, not,
at same point. You can argue they did
that. And that, you know, that they did
so under the assumption they were doing the
right thing. And maybe even in cases they
did stop bad people.
But my point would be that there's much
more to the story than just that this
side fighting against evil, but he goes today,
and this is the point that matters.
Today,
we fund and support groups who commit the
same atrocities. While sanction the court set up
to the wake of this very evil.
Now think about them saying this today while
they know that they're supporting y'all have movement
to supporting the living and embodiment of everything
we... We're fighting at this point in Israel's
Zion as government
that they're actively sanction and and threatening the
families of people we involved in the very
courts as he highlights that were created based
on this event.
And you and you frame it as today.
We honor them because that, I mean,
how... I mean, what else you gonna do?
Not gonna give up, they're gonna keep lying,
but I think it's incredible to see.
Now let's talk about this important conversation.
Now I'm thinking based on let's see, the
time in general.
This is important that I hope you guys
will take the time to go through. But
I... Know, I'm... I'm trying to sign whether
I wanted to read it like I was
planning.
Also have to go through. The point is
there's a lot of important breakdowns in this
that I think or... It just... It goes
to obviously the points Robert makes in this
article.
But just the bigger picture that damn near
everything we're talking about is misrepresented in some
way, lied about. In many cases, just the
exact opposite of the reality.
So first, I'll play the clip,
debunk bill bill maher d
car of Gaza.
Here's just... It was the clip that was
circulating with viral, it's not brand new. I
think it was,
from over 7 months ago. So before,
Or, I guess it would've have been pretty
much right in the beginning. Right? So I
think this was
because of October seventh. Either way, here's what
he's saying about Palestine about Palestine... Excuse me.
Palestinians and Palestinian society.
But I use customs make a difference. Okay?
And the people of Gaza, by the way,
if the Israelis did get rid of Hamas,
they'd be doing a giant favorite Yes. To
the people of Gaza who ate hamas too.
But next to a couple of zion.
Let's just go through the lists
because Israelis rep
look like us in most ways values wise.
Maybe we're not doing it the right way.
Isn't that sort of a racist statement and
of itself? Right? I mean, it seems kind
of weird to say it like that? No
religious tolerance.
That doesn't exist in gaza, you either Muslim
or in In and you better be a
Muslim. Of a life. Female freedom
free and fair elections,
free speech,
gay rights.
Can I just finish my list of pe
I'll put that under? Don't ask.
Child bride. And so forth. The quality of
the sexes. I'll categorize out under don't make
me fucking laugh.
The the fact that, you know, the plan
thing that this is where they should be
aligned with? That these are the values that
you supply? See
just that point actually to start.
Why is it that we have to pretend
that to support or not support a genocide
that you're supposed to be completely in alignment
with everything they think.
You can objectively
eyes that this is a murderous action that
what they're doing is destructive and illegitimate.
While also saying, well, I don't agree with
that policy. I don't think they're doing that
right. It's absurd for him to make this
blanket statement that you're supposed to choose aside.
Then I look more like the Israelis. Therefore,
I don't care their committing genocide, Like, I
he can't actually believe that.
I mean, I just... I don't even understand
how anybody who can speak.
I mean, who who has the intelligence not
to speak clearly can end up saying
something that is so completely devoid of objectivity.
It's incredible to me. So here is what
Robert wrote.
So I'm just gonna go through the actual
breakdowns of each 1 of them.
So religious tolerance.
He says that doesn't exist in Gaza, Sales
bill bill Maher, but Bill Maher, but who
goes on to say you are either a
Muslim in Vidal and you better be in
Muslim.
Now, contrary to Bill Maher ridiculous claims. There
is a small but thriving Christian palestinian population
in the Gaza strip. Many of whom have
now been unfortunately killed by Israeli air strikes
or driven out of the territory during the
ongoing war. But it's a verifiable reality. There
are churches. There are Christian communities and they're
completely welcomed in this discussion.
Now that doesn't mean that there's not some
people there that don't like them or just,
I mean, did anything. There are people in
this country that don't like Christians or don't
like muslims. It's everywhere you go. But the
point is, it is an existing. It's a
part of their society.
Does he not know that does he not
care to look?
Does not seem ridiculous?
Palestinian and Christians have always had an essential
part of Palestinian society, and while the majority
of them that still live in there are
located in the West Bank, There's always been
a Christian community in Gaza.
Over a thousand Christians lived in Gaza before
israel's attack on October, and that's that is
even small because of what they've done leading
up to that. But 70 percent were Greek
Orthodox and the remaining population were Roman Catholics.
The Christians in Gaza were always known to
be wealthy and well educated. On a personal
note, she says, he says his mother Told
him that growing up in Gaza every single
1 of her teachers at the local Un
school she attended in her refugee camp were
Christians.
Doesn't sound to make them seem make sense
if they're allowing them to teach their children.
They somehow despise all in else.
It's just this ignorant racist bigoted mindset that
they continue to push.
Not to say that there's not some element
that You can find it anywhere. It says
it is a well known fact that as
a financially prosperous community, the Christians of Gaza
have a better chance than Muslim first Palestinians
to leave Gaza as the costs of fleeing
is extremely high. Starting with driving Egyptian border
gardens realized Egypt does not completely clean of
all of this. That demand between 5 to
8000
Us dollars to leave a single person,
which is 1 of the reasons why it's
obvious is that they don't just get to
come and go as they please.
But it says there's also historic churches in
Gaza, 2 of which the Israelis bombed and
destroyed during the ongoing war. In December, Israeli
soldiers even shot dead and elderly palestinian Christian
woman her daughter. While they were seeking refuge
in Gaza city's holy family church. On the
other hand,
Hamas
not only publicly supports the full rights of
palestinian in Christians, Perks 2017
charter, it actively congratulate the Palestinian Christians on
their holidays, while making sure to frequently mention
the rights of Christians in their press briefings
things. Now could it all be lies to
fabric some illusion, of course?
Their action show otherwise. The head of Hamas,
ishmael Hana
has even performed various public visits to Church
in Gaza, while Mosque condemns frequent Israeli attacks
on Christian holy sites.
It's just incredible. Like, of course, anything that
can all be a value fact
factor illusion. But what do we see? We
see them saying this doing that, and then
we see Israel
Bombing stu, killing Christians, all over the world,
in fact, Syria in particular,
and then we just pretend like what they
say is true while we can prove the
opposite.
Israeli prop will often point to there being
no Jews living in Gaza as proof that
Hamas is somehow not tolerant of Judaism to
which Hamas has responded by affirming that problem
was with zion and not the Jewish faith.
Which, yes. The older document,
the earlier charter, which by the way, was
created a time when there was much more
overlap with Israel funding and controlling. I think
what was happening. Any case, the 2017 Charter
makes it explicitly clear. A moss affirm that
its conflict with the Zion project and not
the Jews because of their religion. It's exactly
what it says. The link is right there.
It act where was it right here? Saying,
however, it would be rather foolish to take
the word of hamas is proof, which I
agree with. Yet the accounts of the various
anti zion Jews who have traveled to Gaza
and been treated well by the authorities does
support the claim. Yet, this is not enough
alone to close the argument. And again, there's
always an overlap. It says it is important
to note that Israel makes it illegal for
its own jewish citizens to enter Gaza.
Or any other palestinian and control territory, which
is 1 of the reasons why they they
pulled them out in the first place. So
this argument that you claim that they all
got pushed out is simply not true. And
you could prove it with their own documents
like most everything we're talking about.
Then here's another important point. That's gonna overlap
with something in a second.
While the issue of Palestinians and Gaza could
be dedicated to the entire book. Bill Maher
argument,
about Muslims and in is not on false,
it seeks to play on stereotypes created about
Muslims and islamic cultures, in general,
in order to make a scene as a
Palestinians and Gaza will kill you for not
being on their faith. Something that in fact
has happened in israel more than once, a
lie that Israel and his representatives are all
too happy to lean into. Remember this 1?
She's gonna come up in a second, but
here she is getting caught lying about this
to make you think that they didn't have
Christians in Gaza. Same lie they're pushing now
and Bill Maher happy to lie about. If
a cease ceasefire means the return of the
hostages
and the dismantle
of age genocidal regime that has stated that
they're going to attack us again, then... No.
That's not the case. You have individuals protected
in cutter who have said that. I don't
believe that's the reality. I'm not saying they
won't fight for their resistance, but the idea
that they're just gonna keep attacking Jews until
the jews are gone, which is what they're
talking about is simply not reap the reality.
Would be in favor of a cease ceasefire.
But if a cease ceasefire means that we're
just gonna keep them quiet for a bit
until they attack again then it's Israel's
obligation to defend its citizens and destroy that
threat? Don't you think?
Why is it necessary? It would is reported?
To start shooting, having snipers are outside of
church.
I don't... I saw the reports this morning.
The church... There are no churches in gaza.
So I'm not quite sure where the report
is is... They're right there, she's used to
as all Zion as israelis are in the
past. I've just saying why and land media
cow to that lie,
Not anymore. There's there's a catholic church and
there isn't there that is... Yeah. Unfortunately, there
are no questions because there would Oh, okay.
So, oh, yeah, There was a church, But
no Christian though, which is also a lie.
You also catches ron. But I've love how
quickly you go from There's no churches. Open
but there is, but, yeah, there are no
Christians.
Are you... I mean, are they really this
ridiculous? I think so.
Drove drove driven out by... There are respectfully,
are there are chris because I spoke to
an Mp yesterday who has family members in
the church who are Christians.
Well, I don't.
I don't know who was attacked I just
almost just move on then because I'm a
liar.
That's doug your top... That's how 1 of
them have been shown. All of these representatives
across the board have been caught repeatedly lying
as ridiculous as that.
They're embarrassing.
Now, female freedom
on the topic of female freedom,
The western regimes love to employ what is
often termed colonial feminism in order to argue
their superiority over over other nations. While there
are mount a mountain of dev issues surrounding
women's rights elsewhere in the world and Gaza
is in no way in exception to this,
The idea that Hamas is implementing some
uniquely evil system is just ridiculous.
At this stage of Bill Maher list, he
doesn't elaborate on the points. He simply states
them as fact. This is likely because he's
already used his whole muslim on the talking
point, con up false images of Gaza being
a society of bin laden lovers.
My mayor didn't tell us.
Why he thinks women and Gaza don't have
freedom, but he can safely we can safely
assume that he doesn't see a near 19
year long siege and genocide is factoring into
this. The most common talking point normally surrounds
women's clothing, on which the Western world likes
to point to laws implementing hi job or
Islamic heart head scar for women. In Gaza,
guess what? There is no such job law.
That's a iran that they point to. Although
the society is societal conservative, and there's often
great pressure for women to cover their hair.
Yet,
the way women are judged for how they
dress and behave changes depending on where you
are in Gaza, some areas are much more
socially conservative than other areas, But that law
is not existing Gaza.
But here's an interesting overlap that you might
not know. As they're screening about the the
women and the the une rights because the
heat job and everything... This is what's going
on in Israel.
If we look at the Israelis.
The more liberal is really Jews who live
in areas like the city of Tel aviv
will dress openly, whereas? Guess what? The more
socially conservative Jewish communities, will not allow their
women to show their hair at all.
For instance, even to their own family male
family members,
That's not a joke. Well, that'll get denied
like the woman lies about everything, but guess
what?
This is real.
Married, Jewish women are expected to cover their
hair when the presence of men or around
other other husband or other closely family other
the members.
Such coverings is common practice nowadays for orthodox
jewish moment.
Okay. So why is it not the exact
same thing?
Because it is.
Just because you just don't... You just don't
like their society, you're talking about a religious
reason to cover your hair. How is that
different?
And the point here is we're preparing gaza
iran,
to Israel. So here we have Israel, forcing
their ribbon to cover their hair in certain
circumstances not across the board, but just the
same way in Gaza,
You don't even have that... You have some
of them that that that
societal field that's the right thing to do.
There's not a law in place.
My point is if you compare the 2,
it's much more strict in Israel between Gaza
and Israel.
But I mean, it's just hilarious the kind
of things they put forward.
Now, of course, the argument is just in
it's ridiculous to argue that they're the same
thing because we know there are a bunch
of muslim heath that's the mindset of people
that make these arguments.
Just because they're Palestinians like Toronto, You're acting
like a Palestinian. Therefore, we know that. Well,
all you're doing is tapping into the narrative
spine by people like Bill maher who don't
know what they're talking about or lying about
this?
It says, where was the other part? Oh,
yeah. This just says when when the... With
this being said, even if Gaza had a
hi job law, like Iran or Saudi Arabia,
which by the way is a chief ally
in the United States, and Israel's trying to
align with them, but we don't care about
their hi job law. Right?
This is not a justification for bombing civilian
areas and.
You do not bring about female freedom by
mass murdering over 10000 women. That should kind
of be self evident.
Excuse me. Now free and fair elections. This
point is perhaps the most ironic as both
Israel and the United States are the reason
why there are no elections in the West
Bank, Gaza script, andy he's Jerusalem at all.
When Asked won and what have been what
Jimmy give Jimmy Carter, which I still questioned,
by the way,
literally called a free and fair election 2006.
Washington, Brussels and Tele aviv imposed sanctions on
the Hamas government. So there's only 2 ways
to look at that.
They pretended they like the Freedom concept and
democracy
and then gave them an option, and then
go, well, we don't like what you chose.
So sanctions, which makes them look like ridiculous
children.
Either you support democracy or you don't. You
don't get to go. We don't like what
you chose
or
based on the fact that we know israel
funded,
for the very purpose of making sure they
didn't get a tuesday solution. I argue that
it's justice likely that they manufacture that outcome.
In order to use it the way that
we know that they did. To say, well,
see they support bad guys. We can't allow
that. So you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state.
Yeah. Sure. He deliberately
systematically even even told he's on record
whoever wants to avoid.
The threat of a 2 state solution has
to support my policy of paying protection money
to the.
So
and then the former head of Shin bet
goes on to tell you that they sent
1400000000.0
dollars in suitcases, you know, for freedom.
But
The point is
the Us with the help of Israel,
even plotted a coup against the Democratic elected
Mosque government in Gaza in 2007.
Supplying the policy and authority
with weapons and financing just to deposed hamas.
But it's okay. It was for freedom. Right,
guys.
Right. We get... Democracy. But we don't like
your democracy. So we're gonna cheat and maneuver
your, you know, regime change you into the
right democracy.
Like, it's just... It's just laughable.
These p... It's just like we just played
the clip from,
I forgot forget it was. Now It's it's
just nothing but regime change after regime change
in a legal action. That's what they are.
I think it was
not I'm forgetting his name off the top
of my head. Any case, it's says a
os wind of this to the coup plot
and foil it to which is where responded
by tightening its blockade on the gaza strip.
By the way, is never has been the
same percent. So that that's the game of
saying that you know, we blockade it, but
we're not occupying it. Even though we control
everything. It's just it's been lie from day
1. The last major attempt for Hamas and
their faith fat rivals
who run the West bank Pa to form
a unity government dismantled after Israel launched a
war against Gaza thousand 14, which scholar Norman
Fin argued was due to the threat of
a palestinian peace offensive. I love the frame.
Is another thing to think about. In the
United States, we don't see it the same
way. But in the the concept here is
that if in the case here or, like,
Israel, for example,
If you don't get enough of the majority
enough votes,
you can form a unity government with the
other... With the other coalition
or rather the other group and form a
form a, I think that's the right term
for for a cup a coalition I believe.
Either anyway way, whether reason aren't term at
the point is you form with the other
group and then become enough to become the
government. Right?
So
and it was your opportunity.
If you really wanted to indicate that the
homo Os and Pa were like, look, what's
form and we can make our own government,
and they said, no, war and they invaded
based on some other gains they were play.
That's the same point. They funded them to
keep them separate.
And then they lie and they carry out
a war
in order to maintain that
separation. I mean, it's been like this in
the very beginning. And anybody who has honesty
at all and the the wherewithal the look
for, it's it's becoming more and more obvious.
This is 1 of the reasons why you
can't put this Genie back in the bottle.
This stuff has come out. Now. Even Corporal
Has being beginning to point in some of
this stuff. Now it says Sam never stopped
calling for free in elections, which is very
true. You could argue lying, but that's very
true.
Anyone who listens to what the movements leaders
have to say. Will know this well. Now,
by the way, the leaders don't necessarily mean
the the 3 of them safely and cutter.
But there are other leaders within this movement
that I've been speaking out, but even them
as well I think as 1 of the
cases. It's just the the 1 who's threatened
by palestinian and national elections is israel.
Nah hamas, who would like would likely win
another election. So it's very clear that who
actually fears the reelection. Meanwhile, on Israeli side
politics, there are literally hundreds of thousands of
palestinians living in east Jerusalem,
which Israel real has Annexed and declared part
of its territory officially. You know, because donald
trump in the illegal actions where they're in.
The Palestinians of East jerusalem are neither Palestinian
authority passport holders nor are they allowed to
hold israeli passports.
They are given some random jerusalem Id. The
Israelis can revoke at any time,
anytime they choose and are not allowed to
participate deductions.
But democracy freedom. Right? That's free and fair
elections for you in israel versus Gaza, free
speech.
Overall obvious points here. People are not shy
about publicly criticizing Off. Now again, people will
clutch their pearls. How that's not true because
you listen to what the Us narrative sellers
tell you. Good point is easily verifiable in
a thousand different ways.
They will literally scream insulted to moss members.
From inside their homes in front in some
instances, There there... He says, while, there is
no law preventing palestinians names from criticizing hamas
government, there have been cases where police forces
loyal on have detained an abuse citizens for
acting against them, acting, not criticizing something that
cannot be denied. But by the way, you
can show in the United States and israel
real dan anywhere, but says, however,
It's not at the norm of her police
to harass and even harm dis in the
Western world,
as many citizens of the Western Nations who
are critical of their governments know very well
right to this day,
The case that can be made against Sam
when it comes to free speech can be
made anywhere against just about any government.
If you contrast it with Israel. However, These
rarely regime may allow Jewish israeli citizens to
get the right to free speech on most
occasions. Most,
just ask the Orthodox jews how that works
out for them.
With most of the exceptions to this rule
coming during the current war, which now you
are now his point there is you now
see
zion jews. Being attacked this streets or shut
down for the protest because they suddenly want
them to stop or take the deal from
loss or just decide to not want them
to keep killing Palestinians.
That's the point. It's all about the narrative
line and the peep on the right... It's
not just free speech and general because you
get free speech, beef if you say the
right things. Sort of happening that way in
this country too.
Now it says, yet for non Jewish israelis,
there is clearly no such thing as free
speech.
Here, he said I would refer to the
following reports by human rights? Watch? All these
are linked, Am International,
that sell them is leading human rights Group,
Israel was openly defined itself. As per the
2018
nation statement to be a state in which
only Jewish people have the rights to self
determination. As obvious, long highlights unique, which means
What's the word to use? Meaning it only
applies to 1. Right? It's not for everybody
else. It's unique. It's specific.
And we see that m more than ever.
As Palestinian citizens of Israel are being arrested
for liking social media posts and sharing content
online.
Compare those 2 things. It's just because the
narrative is fun about what they're supposed to
see them as from the lower types of
the world,
which is based on
irrational bigoted nonsense in most cases.
They're It's you when you compare the 2,
it's really clear right now who is the
most fascist, who is the most authoritarian?
That's not even to say I I mean,
I've made it very clear. I don't support
them off, most importantly because I believe that
they still have influence Israel.
But gay rights. On this issue, gay rights
do exist as a category in gaza under
Hamas rule. They do.
It is viewed by both the Hamas government,
and and most of the societal society socially
conservative
population of Gaza, whether Christian or muslim as
a sin according to religion.
Yet, the argument often made by Zion that
if you are gay, you will be thrown
from a roof is completely inaccurate and sheet
propaganda.
There are gay palestinians in Gaza that are
open to their friends and members of their
families about it, but this is only in
the more liberal areas of Gaza strip. And
this place is in this country that are
like that. In a socially conservative society like
all religious societies on Earth, peep being openly
gay difficult.
But not to the point where we're gonna
be thrown off a roof. Now it says
that being said, the Israeli attempts to pink
wash their war crimes in gaza while pretending
to be so liberal and open to gay
wright themselves is not rude in fact,
gay marriage is illegal in Israel.
Case you didn't hear that. Gay marriage is
illegal in Israel.
And while they may advertise their large gay
pride parades in Tel aviv he as evidence
of their pro Lgbt stance, this is actually
not tolerated at all.
By large segments of these relic society.
Quite the difference? Isn't it. In fact, the
second largest Israeli party Netanyahu is ruling coalition,
the religious zion is in party,
is led by a man who openly brag
about being homophobic.
I mean, these things should matter. Shouldn't they?
Now again, that's not to say that there's
not extreme elements of in in Gaza elsewhere
that might act in their own way, but
from a societal perspective, it's just not the
same thing.
Now Pe is a very interesting 1. He
goes again on this point, Bill Maher tries
to play on the ignorance of his audience,
following this point by saying child Bride and
so forth.
So right off the bat here, the legal
age for marriage to be cons in the
Palestinian territories is
18 years old in the West Bank, while
in Gaza at 17.
For girls in 18 for boys.
That's that's that's higher than the Uk, guys.
Although there have been cases of girls being
married off at younger ages, This is not
common and is not legally binding.
In israel.
The age for marriage is also 18, despite
there also being rare cases of child marriage
there too.
However,
on the question of actual.
This is something that's shockingly easy to look
up.
Israel has also been declared a haven for
Jewish pe files, who will often escape affiliate
charges in their countries by fleeing to Israel.
Unlike gaza,
There have been countless cases of horrifying
gang rape in Israel and all sorts of
other atrocities of this kind, which are so
out of troll that nearly half of the
sexual abuse cases between 2019
and 2020
involved underage girls.
In Israel,
The reason Maher mentioned Child Bride is just
so we can invoke the stereotypical Muslim terrorist
archetype in his audience minds.
It is not only that he is lying
here, he is trying to stir up bigger
bigotry in order to justify Israeli actions in
Gaza.
Now if you really haven't looked into this,
you really should. It's actually pretty unnerving. Here's
just Cray article I'll include that as well.
That goes over this horrifying this... He wrote
this as well for the Cradle.
Robert That is. Now, lastly, that Israelis is
like us. Bill maher listed off all the
points addressed above. He preface what he said
by talking about values and customs, mentioning that
israel's roles israelis look like us. He's basically
trying to say that the israelis are like
us. They are western people who share western
American liberal values, whereas the Palestinians or society
is alien immoral.
As
demonstrated briefly above the israelis are not a
perfect representation of American liberal values at all.
They are an ethanol state that is built
on an idea of jewish supremacy and does
not afford equal rights at all.
Bill mar is simply lying to justify Israel's
actions in Gaza. He does this by d
Palestinians.
As is the case in all genocide and
wars of aggression. You can't do it to
equal human beings, so you have to transform
the other
into the equivalent of un unmanaged barbaric animals.
How to do that?
You lie.
Very well put. Guys. I think this is
an outstanding article.
Of course is getting very, very little reach.
So chair, get it out there.
Now this, I'm probably gonna go over
just interest time on to make sure we
get some other the topics as well. This
is a great article.
I mean, I don't I didn't highlight that
much, But so that this is an important
point. I do it all the time.
This is important just in general because we
we've been highlighting this. In particular, long before
October seventeenth theme, but especially afterward Roberts were
and myself, highlighting
the potential for this to spin out of
control, the under standing that if if you
understand the the real dynamic that Israel's are
well aware that they cannot take on levin,
a hezbollah in particular, that even with the
Us support,
that that would draw in all of the
other parties, and it's very clear if you
take an objective look at this that they
will not succeed here, which makes you wonder
why they're continuing to push this.
But is real or certain the the title
of the article is what does Israel seek
to gain from a war on Lebanon.
Now the point right now is this is
spun out recently?
And it comes down to what... Don't forget
the first part of this that Israel is
occupying parts of Lebanon.
According to international law. So all what means
is that they have a legal right to
arm resistance per the 4 Geneva convention that's
international law.
So if they're bombing civilians at the crime.
Right? But if they are simply attacking,
that's legal,
military targets, which, again, when you're talking about
illegal settlements,
especially with those illegal settlers have been given
official capacity by Israel, which has very publicly
happened since October 7, that that you've created
a human shield dynamic there. These are the
entities that you are using as your official
entity, they makes them legal targets.
And not even to say not at least
at which because they have weapons. But my
point,
is that they have been attacking and
occupying and doing all sorts of stuff the
settlers, but also is real. And so Lebanon
responded. And I think it has to do
with multiple things leading up to this. As
he writes in first the in the first
instance, some 96 fires were cost. That's what
1 of these images are. It's huge background.
Since Monday, and this was published on the
sixth was today.
Due to Hezbollah rocket fire, producing videos and
images causing outrage over the extent of the
damage caused, which doubled the amount of buyer
damage recorded during the 2006 lebanon on this
war, just in these first so many actions.
Despite this being undoubtedly true, and Hezbollah has
most certainly picked up the pace and it's
a attacks on in recent weeks. The corporate
media is not providing context, surprise surprise.
According to a recent report issued by Human
Rights watch. They've confirmed that Israel has, as
I just showed you by the way, again,
used white pho risk munitions against at least
17
lebanese municipalities. As a crime. No matter how
you spin this, including the use of banned
our air burst white pho on 5
civilian populated
municipalities just since October.
And just really quickly, which I'll just give
you... Just bring up on old the oldest
1.
Which is just really crazy to me how
obvious this stuff can be. I believe this
1 is from... Oh, this is the newer
1.
Come on I can't type. So here here's
the older 1. This is from 2009.
Human rights watch israel's real awful use of
white pho risk. Guess what happened. Absolutely nothing
because the United States gas at the world
and fought in support of the bad guys.
Here's 10/12/2023.
White Pho for used in Gaza, lebanon. Right
there, they've been doing this from the beginning.
Use in populated areas,
civilians.
This is very real stuff. It's incredible that
people that this is just allowed to continue.
It really needs to show you is that
at least maybe all of it, at least
some of the controlling factions of our government
are the bad guys here. They're allowing this
to continue. Or it's very least, they're morally
ambiguous.
But the point is despite being undoubtedly true
or at this part down here that they've
used this on civilians. So this is new
and just not new and not new in
the say sense of the recent of actions,
but not new in general. But it as
important to note that the recent drone attack
came in response to deadly Israeli strikes that
targeted Lebanese towns. So the point is they
responded. So it's not even the fact that
their illegal occupy, was given them the right
to attack whether or not they're attack. They
were responding to ongoing attacks.
And then again, I just go back to
the fact that they killed
a Reuters journalist in lebanon. And October... I
think was 12 to thirteenth. I think I
covered this on the day it happened.
So also, the fighting between lebanon on in
Israel did not just begin. And this is...
Hap... It's been going on long before October,
but the point is in the beginning of
even just this phase October eighth. Hezbollah Began
launching a attacks against israeli military positions, military,
legal, along the southern 11 Lebanese border, primarily
targeting surveillance and intelligence gathering equipment. The strategy
of escalating tensions in response to israel's aggression
against Gaza and later Lebanon has created an
8 month long tit for tat battle along
with the southern Lebanese border with occupied Palestine.
During this time, Israel's murdered Lebanese journalist. That's
the 1 of the ones well technically, this
is a reuters journalist, but They have also...
I I don't think he was Lebanese, but
in the case, they've also killed Lebanese journalists.
They have killed medical workers, women, children, elderly
citizens. Then we're just talking lebanon on guys
not. In addition to hundreds of Le He
members.
The total death toll Lebanon is around 400
since October.
That would be a huge deal if it
was... I mean it is anyway, but if
it wasn't for an ongoing 50000 plus genocide,
but
even He are not terrorists the way that
they're framed,
It's very self it's easy to prove. If
you care to look. Like it's not to
say that you can agree with everything. I
can't... I don't agree with everything the Us
military does. That shouldn't be a hard thing
to recognize.
The idea that they frame Him hamas or
Hezbollah or
as just this blanket statement. It's ignorance, guys.
Stop falling for it.
It says it appears that hezbollah Are now
seeking to draw the Israelis into a larger
fight.
After having dismantled a multi billion dollar intelligence
and monitoring the fence network located in Northern
Israeli settlements.
As was demonstrated in Wednesday's deadly attack on
these Israeli soldiers, which that are really downplay,
during which the air defense systems didn't detect
their drones, with sirens didn't even go off,
showing that they've lost the capability capabilities to
stop most of the munitions for being fired
from Lebanese territory.
So right now, the israelis are bogged down
mil
and I failed to achieve any of their
military goals in Gaza. While they also maintain
a massive military presence for the West Bank.
It's suffice to say that is hezbollah as
in a favorable position and appears to be
leading the Israeli military into a trap.
Now to... End the segment he highlights this
is really
Benjamin netanyahu
is
now with a dead den in Gaza, which
I think everybody can see.
Right? Raf, with everything that's happening, the red
lines. I mean, they've kinda come to a
point towards...
I I doubt they're gonna stop. But
even the Us has been going harder and
harder on on highlighting the Ceasefire game.
He says and has to deal with mounting
pressure from the Us government.
Netanyahu problem is that his population doesn't believe
that they've won the war. They haven't,
and most Israelis want Tel aviv to re
the entire area.
That's what Ben is pushing.
These israeli... Netanyahu also has to deal with
a large number of individuals from different parties.
Like the religious side as a party. Give
your small who are telling and then they'll
collapse the coalition
if they don't... If they bow a Us
pressure. And netanyahu you knows there is no
route to victory here in Gaza. And he's
now faced with the choice.
Which side of the double edged sword on
which to imp himself, Right? Or to start
to.
Point is either way you look, you're getting
screwed here. Is so the only possible way
forward is through another distraction
on another front.
And that's Lebanon.
No now this obviously theo. Right? But it
says, if Israel seeks to launch a limited
War against Lebanon, they can have a brief
exchange of fire with Hezbollah, and then attempt
to close the 11 on front and act
like that, you know, shift the direction. But
it says the strategy means taking a huge
gamble. 1 that will certainly result in hundreds
of not thousands of Israeli deaths.
When Israel, a attacks lebanon has global respond
with unprecedented missile strikes against Israel.
Which, of course, I argue will spit out
and they will say they were attacked. But
the momentum is shifted in such a way
that the world, I don't think we'll let
them just bull rush over this. I'd like
to believe anyway. Under these circumstances, writes, there
will be a little focus the little focus
on Gaza, at least when that's happening, which
I kind of agree if this spun out
into some major hot conflict between the 2
that would take the attention, especially from these
israeli public, who be fixated on the destruction
caused by Hezbollah. In such an environment, striking
a deal with hamas, which is interesting,
will be less controversial, Maybe be easier for
to pull off.
Sort of like would, you, we gotta get
this out of the way so we could
focus on the big war, that's an interesting
thought.
He says assuming this strategy all goes to
plan, the natural next step would be for
israel to launch a large scale attack on
the occupied West bank.
So interesting sales is developing. I think either
way
it's illegal, like all the rest of it,
but it seems like there could be a
strategy to using this
build for something else.
And the other point to make a suit...
Somewhere whether it's the Us or Israel, I
think they're very aware that this is wildly
dangerous. Than what they're doing is almost guaranteeing
that this is gonna spin out in something
they can't stop. So makes sure you wonder
why it's happening. I mean the only thing
that makes sense to me is that the
Us is so compromised that it's being driven
into this by the extreme elements of his
these government.
It don't care and are focused on prophecies
and like, that's what seems to be most
logical, but
I hope Wrong.
Now here's what you're seeing from the Israeli
side of this.
This is 1 of the cities that we're
attacking in Northern Israel. Right, which legally so
because they were bombing and attacking and these
are legally occupied areas part of Lebanon. I
placed tonight following another hezbollah terror attack on
Israeli civilians. Oh, so it's a terror attack
now. Right? And as far as I could
tell these were not siblings civilians that were
killed. We're talking about settlers who are legally
part of the official army now. But in
any case, you can call it what you
want. And he goes, where are the Cease
ceasefire now people? It's such a stupid statement.
So is there, you know, a cease ceasefire
conversation even hacked taking place here? Like, that
they're just trying to con inflate the conversation.
The reason people are calling for a c
ceasefire over here is because you're murdering children
with untold... I mean, constantly deliberately.
And there is even a conversation of a
ceasefire, so we're going get a ceasefire.
I just, you know, yeah. It's... What's astonishing
is the ignorance of people are trying to
gas light people about murdering other people other
the countries,
but Maya says this is our reality. Pray
for israel.
Right. Pray for
this is your reality because you're legally occupying
areas. You're legal settlers, you're continuing to take
things that are not yours, and you are
ignoring the genocide. Pray not to say that
I want individuals to suffer, but we need
to realize where the context lies here.
Now Ef And it's rarely Jews speaking out
about what's going on there. Says if the
people of Israel. Do you get it already
that we were sold out
or not yet?
How hot does it need to get for
you to understand?
Same picture.
She she says, no. It's not just the
current government. There is no left or right.
There are no sane politicians. It was not
a failure.
Speaking back to the same point. Donald Trump.
Right. They've this is... The she she was
we're the earliest covering this conversation.
She says they don't have your back. They
don't fight for you. They serve higher interests,
hundred percent.
You can be talk about the Us government
too for all matter. She says the people
of Palestine have been sold out to, of
course, a long time ago. No value for
their lives. We're all pawns on someone else's
chess board.
When will we... When will it stop? Israel
or Israel.
This is an israeli Juice speaking out about
this guys. It's...
The reality. Your governments are trying to screen
you back into place by using their partisan
manipulator who are screaming the top of lungs
about how it's only this role China or
not that support israel real, that's what they're
doing.
Pay attention.
Sarah Wilkinson in the other side of this
conversation. Right? So after this happens, guess what?
Israel responds by murdering Palestinians, because I guess,
that's all We know how to do. Because,
of course, if they responded the the... In
a certain way in other countries, I mean,
just depending on what they want. It Robert
argument they might want to do that, but
I argue it's in the case of a
an organized sort of action at the right
time,
because you don't they don't honestly want the
bigger response, I don't think. My point though
is that instead of re against Lebanon, which
would cause response, you just turn around and
murder children to Palestine, because that's what they
do.
Israelis surround, attack and set fire to Palestinian
homes,
land and property,
just south of Na.
Why? Because they don't know what else to
do, they're angry and they stomp their feet
and merge children?
Because that's what they do.
And on top of that, Well, they dropped
more white pho in South Lebanon,
this was
on the third.
And you... And this is a verifiable reality,
guys. That's what that is, but the point
is you can prove this in a thousand
different ways.
Now on time, we'll see where we are.
About 3 hours, but aside what we're gonna
get you later. I definitely gonna talk about
this. Let's just talk about this now.
Since this was entitled.
The other things we're gonna get into is
more development on the Spire,
a point about the bombing of the school,
more bombing in general,
aid
and more lies from the end from the
Israeli government.
But this is important. So this again, as
I said reportedly, because this is from Israeli
media. Channel 13. I think. Right? Channel 13?
Yeah.
So channel 13 is reporting,
And let me know if you guys seen
any updates because this is apparently the way
they're reporting this is that it...
Soon, we're gonna see the major report, I
guess. But again, all could be Israeli propaganda
too. It says a political blow. Israel was
put on the blacklist of the Un.
Un secretary General Antonio Gut gutierrez informed Israeli
officials.
Another question would be why would they wanna
public this? Maybe to get ahead of it.
I don't know maybe it's a lie that
jerusalem have been put on the blacklist list
of countries? Quote, countries that kill children.
This is the first time that the army
of a democratic country has entered the this
list, And in jerusalem, they fear immediate consequences
for the military, from foreign military aid from
the world. Let me check this out.
I forgot to listen this earlier. So it's
all in Hebrew. But my point is that
they're showing him speak.
And they're talking about this. So, I mean,
you know, it's certain it's feeling more and
more like this is something that's happened, but
it's... Let's take it with grain salt,
because israel real kinda have to. Right? We
all know why. Let me let me preface
these remarks but I never...
Never ever
believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
So who knows? Right?
But any case, I think it's obvious that
they're killing children, you know, 15000 and so
on, at least in this 1 endeavor since
October seventh. So clearly, it's not a hard
thing to drop your mind around. The question
is whether the Un did this or not,
or whether Israel's lying about this for some
other propaganda purpose.
So but that's that's how ridiculous has gotten
today. Now always, we should question everything, not
just trust any source,
but in most cases, it's... Portable to be
able to highlight that they're reporting from Israel
that this is happening, and you're simply reporting
that this is what they're arguing and what
they're claiming. But even then,
The point is that we, you know, like,
historically, like our like our grandparents and so
on, if the New York Times writes it
it's true.
And it's never been the right way to
do it, But at the very least, you
can argue that it's more report when it
comes from a what's perceived to be a
prominent platform. But, you know, that's just not
where we already anymore. We need to be
in a position where we question everything in
general. Forever.
But it says, but
you it was learned this evening
Thursday. So they're claiming to tonight today by
13 that they're got... That they're they gave
them the incoming information and that the final
signature become this week.
So I guess we'll find out with the
next week. In Israel, they said that they
had been informed by the about the matter
and that
preparation excuse me are being made for the
publication of the decision. The fear in his
rules of the decision, which in fact states
that the Id is army that harms children
because it literally is, will lead to sanctions
from countries in the world, and that very
well may be the case. This could be
the straw the breaks to camel back.
Army
with direct consequences for the 8 from armament
weapons.
Don't leave it there is because, you know,
the rest is all building on the idea
that's gonna happen, But I find it to
be important.
Now 1 of the highlights some of the
things in this segment.
Chris Mah points out
what a...
This is a former Mit associate, professor Jeffrey
England,
an or ordained rabbi.
Who says Jews need to fully reject any
lingering sense of Christian
morality
and embrace ethnically cleansing Gaza in accordance with
Alm law.
I mean, if you could read this for
yourself.
This is actually pretty wild.
May 28 that came out, live by the
law or die on the cross.
Is... It is what says in the subtitle.
Is we're almost stop pretending. It's a nation
like any other. Yeah. Totally not supremacist at
all. I it's not about Dsm, guys. I
mean, it certainly could argue that. I mean,
even Best sell literally says that, but my
point is it's just about Israeli.
But here's the...
Leading Israeli human rights group in the world.
A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the mediterranean. It shouldn't be content
contentious to point out with the leading Israeli
Human Rights group says about Israel. Right?
Shouldn't be.
But apparently facts are just too much to
bear today for some people. But here's what
they'll just give you the images he highlights.
It says.
And above all, given that the land is
nearly all that matters to this death worshiping
foe, that's the talking about the other side.
And totally not the same for that. The
land is not what they cove from israel.
Right? Hardly. Instead of repeatedly withdrawing troops from
the areas we have just taken over so
we can deny having un christian territorial emissions.
You... I have 2 beliefs for a second.
And think even they care at all about
pretending their christian and come on. But as
we should conquer Annex and reset parts of
Gaza so that Jews and friendly Gen pals
both can live there safely, Despite the fact
that the opposite being said by Ben ga
be only Jews. That's what he says.
It is only our lingering ideological sub to
the western tradition that makes them seem scandalous.
Okay. So we just pretend to be good
people. Right? Because of what you're saying basically,
that we don't care about breaking the law
or killing innocent people because always they're just
not on our side.
Oh, was it That was Okay. I thought
that there's was 2 of them there. Oh,
yeah. We go. He goes further, England suggest
Israel as justified in killing children.
Well, because Hamas holds them as shields.
And Later makes the argument of holding them
up as a shield like not just having
their building.
I'd love to see evidence that.
The concept of the innocent civilian
basically isn't true.
The... It's... She's just writing out exactly what
we all know they've been saying.
He backs up his assertion by signing a
passage from the tal stating it is correct
to kill even the righteous among your enemy.
Literally what he's highlighting, guys.
These people are Luna.
It's not... I'm I... This is... There's plenty
of Jewish people in the world that don't
believe all this. Just like you can argue
that there's a extreme passion the bodily point
is that this looks certain kind of person
that leans into the idea because of this...
Because these sentences say certain things that you're
allowed to kill that child.
No. That just makes you a bad person
possibly a soc path. Doesn't matter whether your
religion says it's true or not. The point
is that you know killing a child is
wrong.
I... I'm a christian. I believe plenty of
things that that I've talked about many times
in the ship, not to get into it
here. The point is,
If I read something in the bible that,
like a kill a child that would go...
That's that... Then I wouldn't believe that anymore.
And the point is that on the end
of the day, you can clearly see that
there are plenty of things that show you
an not my personal opinion to break that
down quickly is that these things, all these
are written by people anyway.
My relationship is with something different. But either
way,
Here
is what John Spencer says about this, and
I'm gonna play this clip for you. Hey.
There she is again.
I'm her, who got caught lying about the
churches and Christians and then I'm just change
the subject.
Let's play this clip first. Again, we're talking
about killing children or civilians in general. This
this clip is a follow up to the
other 1 where Piers Morgan was grill the
guy about killing civilians. And he, I know
he got a good response from this, so
he just went harder at the same thing,
but I don't... I honestly don't think he's
honest, but here's what he did.
In the rip... Nope, that's not it.
Dope brainer. Problem with the hotel government? What
was the problem with the Robin government?
Well, they didn't kill nearly 40000 Palestinians and
Oh.
Please peers. We know that the numbers have
gone and down yoyo, even the Un said
last week that it was How many do
you think think killed? That it was ready
all I can say to you is. How
many killed? We have I went in by
the way. She talks about other points this.
The Un has not said the numbers changed.
I've played you that many times. They just
stick with the lies. They have a narrative
lie and they stick with that lie. 40
headed babies, whatever it is. The Un was
explicit. The numbers have not changed. We've simply
added context.
The full number is still same. It is
still 30, 40000 still 15000 children. We've just...
I've we've highlighted that we can only
identify this many of them. Which really means
that the other ones are so mutilated that
they can't figure out who they are. That's
the group the the disgusting reality and they're
using that, showing you especially how evil they
really are. Would say
potentially around 20000 because that's what the you
have no idea. 2000,
You have no idea. But let's not start
with this line of questioning. I I'm gonna
challenge on a question. Don't think no. I
don't think Church knew in the middle of
the second world war. How many Germans he'd
killed? And so this is a a fossil
question. What I. Here's the main point of
the way that they're trying to play this
game. You could make a fair argument as
the guy quoting the tweet says. Did everybody's
lying? Nobody really knows what they're okay. Fair
enough.
The point then is why are they lying
about killing hamas members?
And pretending they don't know or I won't
tell you how many civilians. And all that
really shows you is that they don't really
know then they're just killing whoever they come
from, which is actually what's happening.
Now, by the way, Churchill is not a
good example. That positive that was a very
bad person. And then know this is a
sensitive topic for plenty, people in Uk, like,
going after a a...
There's people that pretend John mccain as a
hero. Right? I mean, there's a lot of
people are, yeah, Madeline Mckay over the rest
of them. There's plenty of people that go
to pass away and they
I know they lying eyes them.
Churchill was a very, very, very person that
was carrying out all I mean, He was
exactly what you would picture a government person
as,
killing people for the agendas of their government,
just like our government does today. So reality
of pretending it he probably didn't know it
didn't care as the point. But either way,
what this highlights is that she's admitting they
don't know, but then pretending they do when
it works for their narrative. I can tell
you... You just gave me a number. You've
no idea what why you've got that. The
Un says the Un says according to the
so called. Okay. So you just told us
the Un is lying, and we can't trust
them. Now you're citing that number because you
ask for a number. As what End says,
that you just can't play it so fast
in losing
both it's all the time. But in the
same sentence. You can't tell us they're all
lying and then use that number when you
want to. Like, they've gotten away with this
flimsy
routine for decades.
Wrap your mind around that. Old Gaza Health
Ministry. Let's take their number. Let's take a
number, the mistaken and corrected number. Nope. That's
a lie. Of the gaza are so called
health ministry, all terrorists underground, hiding like coward,
but let's okay. So now we're pretending that
all the people that were killed are alter
terrorists. That's what she just said. All the
children, all the numbers. On top of that
realized that both the military and their intelligence
have admitted they were reliable and accurate.
And historically have always ended up being accurate,
which is actually an important point to counter
balance with that maybe only 1 size pretending
they don't know. Because if historically, the God's
health ministry has always ended up being pre
accurate to the outcome, which is even what
israel real admitted, then maybe they aren't making
that up, and maybe some people do know.
Maybe the dishonest ones don't.
Say now they're saying 22000.
We know. We've killed 14000
terrorists. No. You're done. So
She just said they know 22 out. That's
not the truth. It's the same number. So
she is playing the ignorance of people pretending
like they... Cut the number in half because
that's where Propaganda we're saying, It's not true.
They played on the manipulation of the added
context
and then says, but, yeah, let's just take
that number fine. 22000.
We know we killed 14000, but his point,
you didn't no, you don't. You just admitted
that that you're making up both sides of
this, but either way,
If you think you've killed 14000, how in
the world have you not shown us a
single example, not 1.
Now you tell. Yes, we do. We do.
So you tell no I'm sorry. I'm not
having that. Pressed. I press the israeli many.
We hang
hang off. We know how to
I'm
She says we know how many brigades we've
gotten rid of.
Okay. So you're able to know how many
it brigades you've killed, but you don't know
exactly how many people, like, that doesn't make
any sense.
And if you're able to peer point to
know exactly how many brigades, how exactly are
you capable of knowing how many civilians.
Because without, you know, by basically deduct logic,
it means that you don't really know which
ones or civilians or not, and you have
this very broad overlap on who is considered
it Hamas members simply by being in a
certain location. That's the truth and even admitted
to this. 9 72 magazines is broken it
down in 14 different ways. She just can't
say that because that would look bad.
Respond to you.
I did many grades. I put this queen
Israeli government spokesman.
I asked him how many how massive you?
Killed and he gave me this figure? And
I said, how many civilians have you killed
And he had no idea. I said well
then how can you be so precise of
how many terror you've killed? You can't. If
you got no do you how any civilians
you killed, why should I believe a word
about the numbers of tam tobacco? Because we
know how many brigades they have because we
have that intelligence. We know how many degrees
So just to be clear. Just to be
clear, you know exactly how many terrorists you
skilled, but you have no idea how many
estimate.
Absolutely. We estimate that there's about 14, 13,
14000
tourists which we've gotten rid of. We know
how many are left. This full... How exactly
do you know how many are left. What
she's doing is saying we estimate this number.
We minus it from that, so we know
how many you're left. But you just said
it was an estimate.
Like, I again, I've said this more than
once, but I actually don't think these people
are very smart. Like it's just by watching
their their way their brain works. Like, it's
just that's that's stupid. What you just did
there? We're gates. That's why we're in Raf.
And how many civilian it? So you went
again, pierce. In the middle of the second
world war. I don't think you
you're doing it as well.
Sorry for. Doing. You're doing the same thing
that Government was supposed to be. You know
exact clean how many he pills? Even have
no idea. How many
Look at the guy on the left just
sm a whole time. Because he's loving this.
Exactly. How convenient?
We don't know exactly. How convenient on but
Israel knows exactly
How many terrorists you've killed believe You no
idea how many innocent women initial? And unless
you just keep screaming. Do you believe that
your numbers?
What does that have to do with anything?
About what you said? What you said about
what you've killed compared to what you will
answer for? The Un numbers don't even play
a factor in that point?
If the best they can do. She is
the best they can do.
That's embarrassing. Do you believe that you Un
numbers?
Do you believe that Find is staggering that
you all? Come on say to me. I
know we're killing 14 hours or 126
a hours. We have no idea how many
severe because we know what the army that
we're dealing with it. Okay. Here's the other
point that he forgot to make this time,
I guess,
If you're telling us that you have been
precise
that we've... Done more to avoid civilian casualties
than never before, but then now you're saying
we just don't know because nobody counts in
the war
reconcile those 2 things.
Is we know what the tariffs Sorry it's
nonsense to say you can count 1 or
not the other. Absolutely not to the question.
I don't know who in the middle of
a war starts counting here the house...
People that they've gone...
Okay again. So
We don't count because what she just submitted
to? Oops?
Okay. So then how can you pretend that
you've not killed that many civilians? That's just...
Basic basic logic here. Think we know how
many are less? Sorry. You're counting are any
accounting 1 side.
Peers, you seem to be a little obsessed
with this Yeah. I'm obsessed with how many
civilians have been killed.
That's... I mean, that's the best they can
do. I mean, that's gonna be pretty embarrassing
And that's why I think they've not they've
yank out and put a new person in
there. But in this is John Spencer simply
going hey, peers. If you wanna know the
answers to your questions about casualties, nerd warfare.
I'm more than happy to help you understand.
The fact is that all the numbers are
wrong. Right? Which is a fair argument to
make, but, of course, if you read the
whole thing, he very clearly sla this the
1 side. As a secret of truth, it's
important to ask and discuss how both sides,
in this case the Idea and the god's
health ministry come up with their numbers. You
questioned Israel officials. I have not seen you
questioned official Gods help health. Of are you
serious? Like, where do these people live? Have
you not seen them? Go...
Scream about that. I mean, they have all
done that. They've all who could have them
off. We don't numbers aren't accurate. I mean,
the point is that he what they're doing
is acting like you've only asked 1 side.
What he's literally doing is asking about the
people who are conducting the action. You're killing
your bombing, your... The idea to pretend if
you're gonna ask hamas, What? How many people
that they've had killed?
It's just a bad point. Overall, the bottom
line is that it's simple logic.
It's very clear to see. They either don't
care about how many they're killing,
it or I guess more than either They
don't care. It's ind.
Or they're completely targeting them and they don't
wanna tell you that. In any case, it
shows you that they're lying to you and
all she's doing with this... I, yeah, some
these people are just rough man. Now I
just talk about the way you can just
see into their lack of a soul in
my opinion. That's my personal thought. Like this
there's something just ex dude that they put
off that shows... And I... I actually believe...
Look, if people that can
pretend, like, murdering children is somehow acceptable.
There's something wrong there, guys.
There's just no way around it. And so
I feel like you can sense that and
see into them when you see that then
initially, I got was very very superficial. My
personal opinion.
But I feel like you can see it.
You can see this kind of soc homeopathic
days in their face.
Now, here, you,
just highlight an individual example. He says as
you may know. I've interviewed the soldier who
fought in the K quebec Ka in East
con.
The town which was a home for 13000
was 100
percent wiped out, and you can list to
these. You've got a whole bunch of them
in a row,
and he admits it.
He says that town doesn't exist you are
happy about that. And, you know, it openly
talks about, like, a justified because they support
them. They took in and support of the
moss member. So I'm happy their whole town
is gone. Oh, you know every single 1
of them did that every single 1 of
them at a vote to keep me come
on,
these people are
so there's... I mean, this is soc.
If not psychopathic to argue that you somehow
can just wipe out an entire town and
feel good about that.
Awesome.
Anything happened from your mills mistakes and not
mistake, basically answering yes, you know, we kill
them.
They... Basically, if if anyone that dies is
the fault of moss.
And that's the same thing you're hearing from
all of them from the Us politicians, doesn't
matter if we shoot a child a face.
That's a awesome fault for starting the whole
thing. That's what they're doing.
Great I'd I recommend you listen to the
whole thing.
Mon weiss on the fourth highlights Netanyahu was
rant against the Icc?
Yet again, quoted a biblical verse that warns
against the dangers of not completely wiping out
your enemy society.
It doesn't take much to figure out what
this means for Israel's jedi war on Gaza.
So Am, you know, there's just 1 after
another.
I don't know how you think that's not...
I mean, these these people are showing you
who they are.
It's not just the society, women, children,
innocent doesn't matter. Kill them all. That's what
they're saying.
Ti highlights. What is Twitter feed it looks
like these days? Dead child, dead child, the
Us tells the world that Uphold international law,
dead child, dead child,
expert on international law explains how Israel's committing
war crimes, dead child dead child, Biden says
israel's not committing crimes, dead child dead child,
un reports outlines, how israel's guilty of genocide,
that child, that child Biden says israel's not
committing. Genocide that you see where it goes.
Right? Dead child the child Donald Trump charge
for lying about sex candidates. You have to
include that 1 he says. The point is,
it's just
consists. I mean, it never stops.
I've I've seen more horrific horrific things and
this 1 engaged topic than I've ever seen
in mind powder greater.
And mohammed shi simply highlights what it looks
like in raf now.
Make really take a second to look at
this, guys,
That's Raf, that's what it looks like now.
That's gone.
I mean, gone.
And we're gonna pretend that these were all
Homo hamas location to tunnels,
No. That's left luna.
They wiped this to the ground,
and this was the safe zone.
Just let that sink in.
Now I think I think what we're gonna
do... By the way, I'm going to do
a show tomorrow. Sure. That's the plan.
Hundred percent planning to do that. I don't
see it because, you, who knows what happens,
but that... I'm doing a show tomorrow.
And so I'm gonna include all of this
along with some other new stuff as well.
But in general, as you you know, since
I just, you know, we briefly talk about
at the wrap,
Cease ceasefire in general,
It's very clear that we're seeing hamas basically
highlight exactly what we already thought was happening.
That apparently, there's been 2 different. You know,
either the Israel's lying about what Biden did
or Biden playing some factor. The point is
that they're...
They just gotten words. They were saying stuff
is happening and they they're saying we are
ready to accept it, though,
Hamas is claiming a disparity between their what
they're showing each other, and ultimately what 1
thing or well highlighted to me is that
if you read this, the actual breakdown of
the ceasefire,
temporary
succession of military operations. And if you read
read more into section 14, it simply seems
to... It gives them an opening,
to go back to bombing should they decide
to, in my opinion, which is exactly 1
of the obvious problems here. And I think
that's what Israel's is desperately about. And the
reality is is real always plan to continue
this. And they're just gas lighting the world.
They bombed another Un school killing many children,
apparently 14 of them were children have been
killed. Another school, and all they can do
is come out and say,
as Elon Levy says here, No. Or this
is... Or or no. We didn't suck you
in school. It was a terrorist whom I'm
lost terrorist.
Oh, okay. I I don't see the images
or even source material. All I see is
you just stating otherwise. Even as Bbc says,
they start a school and kill children.
Right? There's elon levy me. Well, when I
say you and officials are recovering for a
loss. That's what I mean.
That's. That's all you give from him. Claims
that hamas are operating the schools not shocking.
And this is normal.
Okay. I mean, so text on Twitter as
most to convince people as you've been caught
lying. 50000 times.
The point is this is what they did
to the school. Guys, That's a dead child
sitting there dead people on the ground, but
you just go that's not true.
Hamas and stuff.
Why do you... What does anybody think? Even
if you peep even if you were the
most person on the planet,
you're just saying otherwise? And the point is
that
everybody across the board from is from the
United States to the Un to Canada to
everybody who was any standing in this. Even
your allies, that come out and said you
have provided no evidence.
Report un unrest concludes this rule has not
provided evidence April.
April and end of April, and that penn
review finds no evidence to claims of Un
and Hamas.
I'll read this later on claims bert fact
versus fiction.
Of course,
condemnation mount over Israel's proposal to label them
and a terrorist agency. Like, it's just getting
pushed back now because it's flimsy, and they
don't have as much influence as they did.
On large numbers... Oh, this was just just
a
image of the people suffering because they bomb
that. Of course, we have many examples here,
bombing the these central Gaza strip,
just killing people. Mean, these are all situated
standing there, watching this explosion.
Pretty telling, guys, are just bombing innocent people
all over the place.
Hundred and 50 people killed in 24 hours,
most of the women and children.
All these on and on and on. Guys.
This were just just lost couple of days.
Dead people getting killed and all over.
Lot moss members not even justification for it.
Just death everywhere.
We'll talk about this in the next show
israel real apparently phasing out the desert detention
center.
Oh, you mean the the torture camp, you're
phasing it out, so you're admitting to it
or you know, how's that work out? As
Max Blu rights writes, It's really officers have
so palestinian prisoners to death. In this camp.
Oh, we're gonna phase it out though. Sort
of like the human shield dynamic. We'll call
something else. Does that work? That's they're gonna
do
Israel is secretly targeting American lawmakers with Gaza
of war influence campaign. Surprise surprise.
We'll talk about this 1 0, this this
I used for the I'll I'll show you
this since we put it for the image.
Actually, we'll end with this. Since I show
that use that image. Well we'll also I'll
talk about you and aid more lies there,
but we'll end with this.
Make sure I didn't anything here. Yeah. We'll
I'm with this.
So this is a clip low key shared.
Of a... I believe this is somebody being,
you know, interviewed for, like, becoming, I think
it's sticker safe state or some... Another position
in the Uk.
And it's just shocking the way that they
refuse to answer this question, and it... It's...
I don't even explain it. You'll be able
to immediately recognize
why she is dancing around the point. And
that's why this is even shown,
fake social media accounts,
influence campaigns,
Where was it? Right here? Secretly targeting American
lawmakers, but it's not just American lawmakers. Right?
Reportedly using fake social media accounts to garner
support
Here is
secretary state or, you know, for
the British Secretary state for media, Lucy Fraser
can't condemn israel.
Oh, I guess I did forget that. Let
me grab that.
As I grab this.
It just goes on for a minute.
Where she is just
in really embarrassing fashion just simply refusing to
to even address the question until she's sort
of forced to.
And it's and it's... You know, it just
she acts like we don't even know even
though it's the most verifiable thing.
Here's the video.
To more shock.
As a champion, I imagine of independent journalism
that Israel has locked journalists out of gaza
in order to hide what it's doing in
Gaza
And I kind of search, I can't find
you on the record
anywhere
condemning Israel
for locking journalists.
Out gas.
We a number of speeches, John
you're free to read them all about how
journalists are treated. Across the world. Yeah. In
gaza. And including referring to,
the high number of deaths that have taken
place in Israel and Gaza
and
always happy to support
journalists. So just to get it on the
record period.
You you share my shock at the fact
that Israel is locking journalists,
including Bbc journalists
out of Gaza.
I am very keen to go to Israel
to answer... No No.
This is really a very simple. Is. A
question to answer, it's not a question if
you're having to be on the ground in
Israel. You don't have to go to Israel
to have a belief. In the principle of
independent journalism. You you can't visit every country
in the world to do an on the
ground report a secretary state. This is a
matter of principle
does Israel have the right to lock journalists
out of Gaza so that they're unable to
report
on the on the ground,
breaches of international law in Gaza.
That's a question that you can answer quite
in quite a straightforward first class. I like
to look at evidence.
Right. Wouldn't if if and... You you can't
get any evidence and if journal on the
basis. Journalists are lockdown out of Gaza, you
can't look at the evidence by definition. That
is the point of journalism
to gather evidence. On you can't see the
evidence
because journalists are rock.
Very clear.
Very clear in in my...
Engagements with news operators,
and in a number of speeches Have made
about the importance
of the freedom to report the difficulty and
reporting in law zones.
And I... We know very keen. I'm very
keen, John, very keen.
To ensure that wherever people are in the
world that they have the freedom to report.
Yeah. Thanks. It's so frustrating
So my my opinion,
she is either
aware that by think bad things about Israel
that it's gonna hurt career so she just
tries to avoid it, which is certainly a
large thing that happens or she's
being
bribe funded, influence compromise in order to be
afraid to make these comments or that it's
in in financially in our interest or not.
I mean, this is what's going out in
the world today, guys, it's not even up
for debate,
It's only debatable whether it's happening in this
case or not. Right? I mean, the whole
thing is that the first point is almost
more
prolific that people just recognized that. They know
that if they say the wrong thing, they'll
get attacked by the lobbying groups, so they
just kind of avoid it? But it's infuriating,
isn't it?
That
Will always stand up. You're trump a a
variety of a secretary.
Your conducting... Who are unable to do that.
Yes. You're... Yeah. She she is currently in
the secretary statement. You're start taking... You're constructing
a variety of sentences
to avoid seeing something. Because I would like
if if you're putting some to me. Yes.
It's my job to assess the evidence
that is
not a matter on which I have assessed
the evidence, but I would be very interested
to do so.
So for so for so for example,
you would have to go to Ukraine, would
you... And the occupied areas of Ukraine.
Before you could express with you on Ke
and whether it's right or wrong for him
to look.
Oh, is that or is that the case?
No. It's not. Seeing as hell they've all
expressed many opinions on how they should deal
with Russia and how Russia's governing committing war
crimes. Or China is committing genes genocide against
the ui. Right, all these things. Which in
some cases, may be true.
You can cite for yourself. The point is
they're happy to make those assessments without going
there because these people are ridiculous. They just...
It's, like, they can't they they think you're
that dumb. They think we are that stupid.
That we can't piece together that they're just
being inconsistent with their... Basic logic.
I'm glad he's calling it out. B. So
you cannot express a view on any war
zone.
Unless you in person visit that war, you're
gonna be very busy over the next few
years. I absolutely haven't said. That and you
are mis what I say. I don't I'm
particularly interested in what's happening in israel ga
in relations relationships. We all are. And that
is why a number of months ago, I
asked the foreign office that I could go
to israel
in order to go to... Ago. And I
also asked, to go to Ukraine as well.
Unfortunately,
neither of those trips have transferred. I asked
again. Yes. I asked again. I just like
to finish. I asked again last week to
because I am very interested
in the high number of deaths in in
the region and in
journalists.
Just my department again, in fact, last week.
Yeah. Hundreds journalists, hundreds have been killed.
If it was possible for me to go
because I'm very interested ensuring
that journalists have the freedom to report. Yes.
Well, they don't. And I... Would they they
don't, and
the the committee will not. That you've been
given more than 5 minutes to express a
view on whether Israel should lock journalists out
of Gaza and you're choosing not to answer
that quite That is the case it is
wrong, but I would like to look at
the evidence. I think she's a...
Sorry. Wait a second.
If you're
allow me to pursue this, permanent secretary.
If that is the case?
Are you saying that all these months
into this war and you don't know definitively
whether journalists are locked out. It's not a
question if it's the case.
You only have to talk to the Bbc
at 1 of your meetings with them, And
the Bbc Middle East editor will confirm with
you that it is the case. Alright. I
mean, you don't if even don't even need
that. I mean, it's a it's a it's
a public and obvious fact. The Israeli government
has said they're locked them out.
So for her to pretend like you somehow
devoid of the evidence. I'm not involved in
the situation.
Joe at the corner store is watching it
right now on Tv. Everybody in the world
is aware that they have done that. They've
talked about it. They just have a narrative
around it. And To his point, they have
a unique and
access to the Bbc or any journal they
can ask them. And they'll tell you, yeah,
We can't get in.
Again, same point. Cnn new... They've all told
us that they... They're not able to get
in. So this is her...
Pretending life she's being objective and just actively
ignoring the topic and acted like, I'll look
into it. We'll find out, you dan well
know what's going on. That is somebody who
is ignoring it for her personal reasons or
is compromised.
And that is everybody in these positions, guys.
The Bbc are locked out. So it's such
a question at if. Let me move on.
I want to... I think I just wanted
to say for the record. I was at
the same meeting with secretary stake with the
Db,
and I I recollect we covered a range
of topics.
Including
their digital investment, haul
talk a lot of stuff. So I forget.
That's basically the point. Yeah. We talked about
a lot.
Right? Well, that's why I included this image.
Just, you know, first sake of context.
As it says, In Israel a nutshell, the
state, the policy, the people. A heard of
settlers assault of the Palestinian journalist Sa a
Ka
in occupied Jerusalem.
Look at this picture, guys. The other one's
even worse. The other 1 that they might
be beneath it.
Now there's another 1 circulating that shows them
when they're when they're grabbing and 1 guy's
got his arm around his neck, but just
look at these people.
They're all kicking him, running at him
or... Like, look at their faces.
That's hatred.
And in and enjoyment quite frankly, just to
punish this guy,
and that's acceptable. That's press freedom in Israel.
Go back to Robert article. You already know
that.
Crazy.
Now we used... Just to finish, we talked
about the... Reportedly using fake social media accounts
to garner support.
Well, here's an article as or a thread
from from the squirrel, is really propaganda networks
are using digital blackface by making fake accounts
with stolen photos from black people to spread
their genocidal propaganda hoax across social media platforms.
Exactly what Forbes is writing, and you can
look at it for yourself. The point is
there's an any racial overlap to this. And
you... There's a point we'll get into tomorrow
from Russia, what's You might have seen it
where Ukrainian
militants,
neo nazi elements
execute a bunch of black soldiers because they
tried to leave.
Saying you shouldn't stayed in Africa or whatever
they said. It's been pretty... It's gone pretty
viral
and guess who those people are. The same
Az movement militant
stream racist that Israel and the United States
openly support.
There's a reason that they're doing this. They're
trying to manipulate people using fit... There's a
reason for this guys, Now I'll come back
on. We'll do more of this tomorrow. I'll
leave it there for today.
I just hope we're breaking through. I hope
we are breaking through with these conversations and
getting to people, whether it's the
conversation about being cautious around the Covid bird
flu direction, whether taught medical freedom in general,
any number of the topics or the ongoing
immediate genocide that we need to stop.
I just think it's important to recognize who
these people really are. It's not as always.
Not every jew, every israeli. Every Christian, every
American, it's never that simple. The point is
that they want you to think like that.
They're trying force she into that bigoted logic,
so you just choose side.
It's just it's just
always.
Always, against your interests to simplify in that
way to broad stroke and entire group people
I like to believe that most of you
out there know inherently that that's wrong. Even
if sometimes it feels good because you're aligned
with some larger organization or a group that
high fives you about the point is that
somewhere in you. If you have
integrity morals.
You know it's not right.
There's something wrong with that.
At the end of the day, you can
clearly see that your governments, the power structures
have an interest in keeping you in that
kind of mindset. That is the 2 party
illusion for you. Oh, it's too complicated here.
Just pick 1 or the other.
All done.
It's not that simple. And I think we're
all beginning to see that. So thank you
for supporting this platform and continuing to stand
behind the truth.
Objective reality. There's not... We don't each all
of our individual truths. There's is 1 truth.
And yeah, sometimes we disagree about that truth,
but there's still only 1. In each whatever
we're talking about. There's truth. And I think
the day, we've had to, kind of weed...
You don't, what's the right word for it.
We've back and forth through all these different
agendas, you know, during the the trans conversation.
I know my truth no that's all like,
kind of left leaning boat mindset and all
that. But interestingly enough, despite using same terminology,
it's the same damn thing on the right.
Because they're the same thing. More... It's the
same extreme thing from either side ultimately lost
in the same kind of dynamics, just using
different wedge talking points. To get there. And
I'm just gonna probably bother all than when
I say it, but that's the point. That's
what we do. Objective, non partisan,
hopefully, we're building those numbers. And I believe
somewhere in there, I think we're doing so.
I think it's just hard to see.
But thank you for being here and backing
us up and continue to stand for these
things guys because you're making a difference.
Every day. I love you all. As always
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.