- We have to condemn the atrocities that happen every day
to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
Uh, I was part of the human rights vetting process
for arms going to Israel
and a charity called Defensive Children International
Palestine, uh, drew our attention at the State Department
to the sexual assault, actually the rape
of a 13-year-old boy
that occurred in an Israeli prison in the
mosque beer in Jerusalem.
Uh, we examined these allegations.
Uh, we believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, uh, the government of Israel.
And do you know what happened The next day
the IDF went into the DCIP offices
and removed all their computers
and declared them a terrorist entity?
Um, I think it is vital
that atrocities not happen to anyone.
Not sexual atrocity, not sexual violations, not any kind
of gross violation of human rights.
We are looking at a situation where there is so much
deification where people are not seen.
- Welcome to the Daily Wrap Up.
A concise show dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours,
- Monday, May 27th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Unfortunately, some un terrible stuff to discuss today.
It seems like that's the, the daily occurrence
for quite a while now,
but some really tough stuff to go over today.
So I want to tell you right outta the gate
that there's gonna be some stuff today
that's gonna be pretty graphic that we're gonna be covering
that hap that took place over the last
48 hours or less in Rafa.
And it's a sad culmination of, of
a lot of building.
I mean, I don't even know what the right word is
to really cover what we're gonna talk about today.
Hatred, propaganda, you know, the what has been built
around all of this to somehow in some people's minds allow
or justify what we're gonna talk about
and what we're, what we're seeing up until now.
It's, it's over almost overwhelming.
And I think I've said this a lot over the last
couple of weeks or even more.
But I mean, I think at this point,
and we, we kind of reached this point as well
around the COVID-19 conversation at this point,
I don't understand, I'll almost put it this way.
We are at a point where the evidence is so self-evident.
And I don't even mean like it was in, you know,
where there's a partisan divide where it can be argued.
This is how you're supposed to see that we're at a point now
where this has been so utterly exposed from, from,
and as, as I said right in the first couple
of weeks post October 7th, the very people
that they always told you to look
to in these times are the very ones telling
you this is genocide.
Countries are turning against the Israeli government.
People are coming out
and declaring that they recognize a Palestinian state.
The leading international entities in the world are telling
you that what's happening is not just wrong,
but is, is to the level of genocide
and needs to stop immediately.
And yet, there are people still defending
that this isn't even what it looks like.
That there's not a famine taking place, not even starvation.
The at this point, the only people still standing by this.
And I don't mean the ones kind of like unsure waffling,
going well, like I stand with Israel.
I mean, people that are standing
by what's happening telling you that you're wrong to, uh,
to stop Israel, wrong, to stop the arming of Israel.
Wrong in any sense, to say
what they're doing is somehow criminal.
These are the worst people of society.
I mean, there's no way around this.
We're being very, we're watching some kind of distillation
where we're watching people who are one
by one suddenly going, wow, okay,
maybe I shouldn't be supporting this.
At the very least, I'm gonna keep my beliefs quiet
because it's clear that what's happening
is shockingly wrong.
The people that are standing up
and praising this, allowing this telling you
that you should be on side with this
are the worst people I've ever seen.
And that's not about whether they're Jewish or Christian
or ethnicity, religion, location, it doesn't matter.
It's all across the board.
So too, are the people pushing back?
So too is the, the overwhelming obvious that
with a campus protest, the multiple countries,
the worldwide resistance to this,
which is the clear vast majority, it, it's, it's the same.
You, you can clearly see that it's multifaceted.
Religion, ethnicity, location doesn't play a factor.
Well, it always plays a factor,
but it is not the driving reason
for why these people are standing together.
And it's, it's just shockingly clear.
So we're gonna talk about how clear that is in regard
to Rafa and a lot of other examples around it.
But just recognize that and take a note of the people.
Not that's my opinion, obviously,
but take a note of the people who are standing by this,
who are shouting you down for trying to at the very least,
care about people on the other side of this conversation.
Recognize who they are. Make a note of this
and make sure you recognize that they're not the kind
of person that they at least profess to be
unless they're standing up and telling you
that they're a genocide supporting maniac.
That's how I would see it.
Now today, we're also gonna talk about a couple
of discussions, probably gonna be a long show around
the things we didn't get to previously around un a,
an interesting overlap in regard to Shawnee Luke
and the locations that were bond,
which is tied into the conversation today, seeing is
how tangential to a un location
or um, an unre location,
which is a un location in Rafa, was also bombed.
And that this is not new.
And of course, we are the ones being told
that there's Hamas there without evidence of course,
and that they're holding hostages
there without evidence of course.
And that then they bomb these locations.
How that's some supposed to save these people.
And of course, the same conversation I keep having about
this, we're told incessantly about the human shield,
the human shield, which of course is possible
ignoring all the examples we can see in live, real time,
live television that Israel's using human shields.
And there's another example again today
that I'll show you help holding an elderly man from Rafa,
literally having him leading
out the door while they're shooting.
I mean, this just, just don't care.
So ignoring all of that, screaming about
how Hamas is using human shields,
which I've never even debated
or disputed, of course I would imagine anybody in this
situation, in, in the context of what we're talking about,
Israel and Hamas, Hamas being group that has been funded
and armed and supported by Israel for a very long time,
I would not dispute that either side
would be capable of doing this.
The point is that we have yet to see any evidence of that,
which has to be kind of shocking when we're talking about 30
to 50,000 people being killed.
So the point again, as we're looking at this RFA massacre,
can somebody demonstrate for me where the human aspect
of the human shield dynamic is?
For me, I see all the shields,
you're telling me were killed.
Where are the humans that were supposed
to be behind those shields?
How is it possible we can continue to see blis
of dead children and bodies exploded?
And yet, oddly, not a single example of
what they tell me was what they were going for.
Oh, we're told there were two people
that they got there weren't we told that there was a person
that they killed in Jubilee, a refugee camp,
that there was justifiable for killing 200 people
that later turned out to not be the person
that they said he was or wasn't even there.
How do we take this stuff at face value?
How is human life so insignificant to people
to suggest that that makes sense?
It's alarming. Now we're gonna talk about quite a lot things
around this developing awareness,
but I wanted to start with something
'cause it is Memorial Day today.
And I thought it was, I, there's something
that I've read a few times over the years
that I wrote a while ago that I thought was important.
And it really feels es es especially more relevant today.
Not just because it's Memorial Day
and this is about Memorial Day, but
because of everything else happening,
because of the rising awareness around
not just Israel Zionism, but our own government.
And that's, I that I really could make that statement
for pretty much most people around the world right now.
I think there's an interesting evolution, I guess,
of thought around the way people are viewing their
governments and whether their governments are willing
to support the things that we're talking about here,
while pretending they're fighting those things everywhere
else and then going, but wait a minute,
they're not actually doing that.
Wait a minute, they're not even doing that for me.
Wait a minute. And one by one,
these illusions begin to fall apart.
And I think that this is a very, very, very positive thing.
So I wanted to start by reading this again
because it's something that's really, you know,
I believe deeply, directly from my heart.
And I think it's important that we, on days like this,
make sure to make these statements.
'cause usually you get shouted down like you're somehow not
supposed to say something that's contentious,
which usually things today contentious
or the, in my opinion, tend
to be the ones we should be looking at the most.
But let's start with this now.
I think this is important now really,
it's really about remembering
what we're actually celebrating today for Memorial Day.
What, what are we actually celebrating?
Of course, it's always about the idea
of remembering the people that sacrificed.
But weirdly, it becomes
very quickly in the conversation about supporting war,
supporting the state, supporting the agendas
around all the things that they're doing.
Not really about the people anymore,
but the fact that they use those people
to achieve certain ends
that are about freedom that we're told.
But I don't think that's what it's really about.
So what I'm about to say will no doubt be
disliked by many .
I find I, I guarantee just like every year simply
for my speaking the truth and possibly censored by others
for the very same reason.
However, in my eyes, there is no better day
to honor the sacrifice of so many
by taking the quintessentially American action
of speaking truth to power
and exposing the lies that were,
we were all sold by the state.
Now, far too many have been conditioned from birth
to blindly serve.
And to see anything else as an affront to
what this country represents,
yet this nation has not represented what it claims to
for quite some time, which is why I do what I do,
as you all know, to awaken those lost in the lies
to the reality that their loyalties have been hijacked
by those who care nothing for the love we have
of this country's core values.
Whether they were ever truly practiced by its founders
or not, they have become real for us.
This slowly materializing mountain
of lies is also why there is such forceful efforts
to make holidays like today about glorifying the state
and its war efforts as opposed to those that they've tricked
to carry them out despite that being the claim.
And to make those of us saying anything less out
to be deceivers manipulators truly accusing us
of that which they are guilty.
Classic propaganda in the truest sense of the word.
The saddest part is that so many have bought into this
and so many, I mean the two party illusion aspect of this is
what jumps into my mind is we can clearly see that there's
so many elements of this
that are controlling the conversation
and believing that they're doing
something positive within that.
So it's also good to make sure
that we don't highlight them as the enemy.
'cause that's exactly the point, simply people
that do not see it, and of course we could be wrong as well,
but the sad part is that so many have bought into this lie
and so much so that they do not even know their own history,
which is what we're seeing more and more today.
And they turn around and call those
of us embracing the true values as we see it any way
of this country as the enemy treasonous.
Even a quote that I've said a lot over the years
that I really think is important,
president Theodore Roosevelt summed it up, best quote
to announce that there must be no criticism
of the President, or that we must stand by the President.
Right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and cvi,
but it is morally treasonable to the American people.
So today I ask all of those
of you out there currently recoiling
and disgust for my willingness to speak ill
of this country on such a day to first understand
that I'm not speaking ill of this country.
That's the deception. I love this country.
I'm speaking ill of those who have deceived the masses
and use their love of the nation to carry out wars
of aggression in our name.
Second, to take a step back
and simply look at what such blind subservience
to those in power, who arrogantly lie
to maintain it has done both in this country
and to those around the world who dare to think
for themselves, especially thinking this from a country
perspective, the countries we've talked about that choose
to simply not bow to the interest of the Western powers
and have suffered for it freedom,
especially on a day like today.
We owe it to ourselves
and to those who gave their lives for a cause
that they likely realized in the process
of pursuing was not what they were told.
It was to speak the truth
and not blindly acquiesce to the jingoistic pressure
of the brainwashed ma brainwashed masses,
which I believe is a dwindling number day by day.
It's not hard to just do a little research
and see just
how many veterans in fact tell quite a different story about
what we should be proud of and we're really doing overseas.
It's also not difficult to see just
how hard the establishment works to keep their message
suppressed and keep them drugged up and in the shadows.
As Ray McGovern said in a past article for Consortium News,
Memorial Day should be a time of somber reflection,
sober reflection, excuse me, on war's, horrible costs.
Not a moment to glorify war, but many politicians
and pundits simply can't resist the opportunity.
As James Madison, our fourth president
and an author of our constitution wrote Of All the Enemies
to Public Liberty War is perhaps the most to be dreaded
because it comprises and develops the germ of every other.
War is the parent of armies from these perceived debts
and taxes and armies and deaths
and taxes are the known instruments
for bringing the many under the dominion of the few.
In war to the discretionary power
of the executive is extended its influence in dealing out
offices, honors and ments is multiplied
and all the means of seducing, the minds are added to those
of subduing, the force of the people.
No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst
of continual warfare.
My God, what a better statement
to understand where we are today.
And that includes war against itself.
We can see that we are under the,
and again, have always been under the microscope,
under the eye of what's happening.
As Whitney Webb framed during COVID-19, the Body is new,
this new battlefield, the the War on terror
was directed at the American people.
It's the same concept today,
and as this government wages war on its own people in the
interest of a foreign nation today, we celebrate those
who stand for the true values of this country,
the true values of humanity,
and especially when it comes at great cost to those standing
for what they know to be right.
Today. I celebrate all of you standing for honor
and integrity, devoid of political party, ethnicity
or religion as I see it, the true patriots.
So thank you for being here today
and hopefully in being the idea that we're trying
to push forward here, that this doesn't have
to be about division and sides
and political games, simply fighting for the real, fighting
for what they pretend they are, honor, integrity,
belief in things that, that there are things that are sacred
and things that we should believe in
and not just dash to the side.
The moment that it challenges our agenda, which by the way,
is exactly what Israel, United States
and all the ones screaming about,
the rules based international order do every moment
we're watching it happen right now.
So let's start today with a couple of important points.
First of all, discussing the war on our, the war on us.
One point that I wanted to make sure you didn't miss today
that I was tweeting about is
that we are being censored again.
We just talked about Twitch censoring us. Well guess what?
Today, and I was even talking yesterday a couple days ago,
telling, uh, Orwell, I believe that this was coming.
I felt it coming. I saw a, a message they sent.
Well now Stripe a major pla process, uh, payment processor
after remember PayPal censored us and stole money from me.
Now this is happening again.
And I kind of knew this was always the case.
I knew Stripe was a dangerous choice,
but there's not many choices out there.
And here we are. And here's I'll just very
quickly to break this down for you.
This is what we're talking about.
They, they have now, um, given us,
what is it right here saying, basically they determined
that our business
and we're using give, uh, give WP for the web,
that's the WordPress at Plugin, is in violation
of Stripe service agreements.
Specifically, we are unable to access payments
for crowd accept, excuse me, payments for crowdfunding.
They say interesting seeing how that's not what we're doing
and realize we're, I'm actually gonna make a point about the
gives and going a second because
that also seems like it's being as just like we expected.
Unfortunately enough, it's all coming down. It's incredible.
I mean, it just makes me wanna scream out like
where are all the honest people out there, right?
You guys, obviously the people here that believe in
what we're doing, where are the people power and money
and influence out there that actually believe in
integrity and honor and freedom?
Where are they ? I mean, it's frustrating to continue
to fall into this hole.
I mean, any case before I get frustrated about it at the
beginning of the show, the point is that we have used this
for people that are donating to the platform and,
and realize that the bottom line is
that's not the crowdfunding element of this.
They're trying to argue is as if we were fundraising
for something, not that there's a product
or a service that's in in place.
We know you all know. That's the reality very clearly
that we are actively providing a service
and it's much more than just the, the interviews
and the news coverage
and everything else as I'm as the point
that I'm gonna make in a minute, that we have a lot more
that goes on, a lot more interaction with the community,
a lot of different plat uh, engagement
and people that we work with from the community
or people that are substack.
There's a lot of different ways.
This is not even just a donation platform,
but in regard to the actual use of the service,
that's ultimately what this comes down to.
Now, here's what becomes even more frustrating.
The idea that they're claiming we're crowdfunding, first
of all, which is completely illegitimate when you understand
what crowdfunding is, it's not some, it's not.
The point is that it's for a product we're putting out
that people can choose to give us value for.
Here was the follow-up where I followed up with that
and I said, look, this is not, this is not the case.
I'm not crowdfunding, we don't, it's we, you know,
we accept donations for our services.
But here's multiple examples of how it's not just that.
And of course Insta denied, which of course
to me shows me that there's something else there.
There was this came back within 10 minutes
after I sent in this, this follow up, which supposed
to be reviewed immediately, came back
and said, unfortunately, after additional
review, you're still unable.
So they're going to push me off af as of June 6th,
we can no longer use Stripe, which is just infuriating.
You have to realize this has happened to t af
for those new over and over and over
and over, whether it's Patreon or PayPal
or Venmo or everything.
It continues to happen for no reason.
This is, I mean, this is a unique one, seeing as
how they at least gave us a discussion.
They didn't really give you an example
of what exactly it was.
They just gave you the, the, the, the word crowdfunding
and pointed to the, the link.
We're gonna show you PayPal
and the rest usually just kick you off
without much of an engagement.
Here's what I think is important.
So this is what I believe strongly, I mean,
I can prove this is what this is about.
So this is updated April, 2020 fourth, 2024,
excuse me, last month.
Last month they decided
to update this when they haven't done it all
the way since 2022.
What do you think that's about? And I'll show you
what changed very clearly seems
to be one standout difference that was created
that literally is not in this one
creator con, oops, that didn't spell that right.
So one word could just proven to you for the watching the,
the video version that's not in there.
Here's what it says, content creation
or it says creation, but it's not in there.
It says transactions that provide compensation
to creators without an underlying piece
of digital content associated.
So right there without question, that's not us.
We're creating content. But then,
and this finds, I I'm speaking
with these censored news about this op just on the side.
They believe this is sort of a canary in the coal mine.
And I don't know how many other people are utilizing Stripe
for this kind of dynamic, which I'm sure it's a lot.
But look at this. Examples include subscriptions
to free public content or a tip button on a profile page.
Now explain for me how, including basically donations
for free content is somehow crowdfunding.
It's not, in fact the words are,
they're very, very different.
But realize that the two sentences don't make sense together
underlying, so creating without an underlying piece
of digital content associated, that's the,
that's the videos, the interviews,
all the things that we do.
So I want you to recognize that last month, Stripe,
after years randomly decided to insert something that
specifically gave them the opening to shut down
what we are doing probably along with a lot of other people.
I'm not gonna pretend
that I'm the only one this is about, but who knows.
I just want us to recognize how crazy that is
and how alarming it is that we're watching this kind
of thing happen for zero reason why.
And then on top of that, this is what I shared this today.
Here's what Casey Wright pointed out.
He said, have they tried to get you to switch to fundraiser?
He's making a point because look, this is a new thing,
Stripe and fundraiser I've teamed up
to bring you powerful stripe fundraising tools.
So Stripe is literally using its own platform
with another group to create a crowdfunding platform.
How much you wanna bet if I signed up for it,
I would be denied, but IIII probably won't just
'cause I don't wanna keep using groups that will not let me,
well censor me for no reason, especially dishonestly.
So I hope people out there can make a huge stink about this
on Twitter and wherever else to hope
that Stripe will decide not to do it.
Because we have to be honest, no matter what we want to do,
this is going to hurt us.
I mean, you guys know what's going on as we're dealing
with multiple ridiculous lawsuits that are going
to absolutely drain us down to nothing as we're dealing
with this suppression and financial censorship
and continuing to knock us,
my whole career has been two steps forward.
One step back. Now, trust me, I'm not complaining guys,
it's it's not, it's the least important thing
of going on right now as people are being murdered in Rafa.
I want people to understand that this is not gonna go away
and we're gonna keep doing this.
I don't care if I end up sitting in my courtroom, my,
my bedroom doing this for my phone.
I'm gonna keep doing this because it's important and
because if I stop, then this wins.
But nonetheless, we need to realize
how insurmountable this is.
Now imagine trying to be somebody doing this with no,
with starting today.
I, it's not even to see how it's possible anymore.
I can't even believe we have been
able to push past all of this.
It's incredible. And I, I still point back in amazing
platforms like Anti-Media that doesn't even exist anymore
because of that, because they were caught on the early edge
of this massive censorship platform.
The free thought project is still going strong,
but getting suppressed every single day,
and they're one that got hit hard from that.
I just want us to see how alarming this is
and how this is being done
to stop genuine objective, nonpartisan content.
That doesn't even mean all the wa I mean, I could be wrong,
I could make mistakes, but it is still
nonetheless clearly objective and nonpartisan as best I can.
It's pretty alarming. Now, on top of that,
this was something somebody else sent
and we've, we told you briefly about this,
but he has gone back and forth with them multiple times
and apparently his bank wasn't the problem.
But here's the message he just got again from Good send go
going, whoa, we hope this finds you well.
We're writing, you inform you that your
subscription has come to an end.
He has gone back and forth with him three times trying
to tell, look, I don't, I didn't do that.
I don't want this to, he signs up I again
and they cancel it again.
I mean, again, I don't even know if this is about GIBS
and Go or his bank or both of them together.
I just, it's beginning, not beginning.
I mean, for crying out loud, this has been
how I've been dealing with this for a decade.
Let's put it this way guys. We need your support.
, I don't know what else to put it out.
I mean, there's nothing else we can do if they're gonna keep
knocking us off all these platforms.
So whatever you can do to support us,
whether it's from cryptocurrency
or donations based on the platform itself as here on, well,
you know, the, the donation button right here is the
best place to go for the portal.
But the problem is that goes through Stripe at the moment.
So I don't know if that's even gonna,
doesn't seem like it's going to continue.
You can mail things in buy get, buy me a coffee,
subscribe star who knows how long that's gonna last.
I mean, obviously this is pretty defeating,
but the point is no matter what,
it's gonna continue from my end, but it's just kind.
Oh, and yeah, that was the thing here is this is why this is
the, the Gibs and Go is just kind of stuck despite the fact
that we have thousands, five far as I can tell people doing
con uh, continual donations
or recurring donations, which we did a whole push for that.
Anyway, I don't wanna waste you more time on this
because it's just, I just,
I often feel like this gets misrepresented as us just going,
we're being a ta It's not really about me as much
as it is I'm part of the story.
It's about the reality of
what this is really coming down, what it's doing.
And there's plenty of nameless, faceless people out there
that have gotten lost in the censorship just
because people didn't give it enough attention.
I just hope we can recognize that
and I hope this gets attention beyond what's happening just
to TL Now on the note of attacking us,
and in general, I want I in like, not TL in general,
but the attacking from within and so on.
One of the biggest things where people are beginning to come
to terms with is that the Israeli government, more
so the Zionist factions controlling it,
have influenced toward governments
and policy all around the world.
It's not a secret. It's not about racism,
it's not about antisemitism.
It's about a government doing this for its own benefit.
And that's why it's become so hard to not laugh at
how ridiculous it is to call out things as racism
that are just simply
highlighting the crimes of a government.
So one thing about all of that is
to recognize the true nature of what Zionism is
and the fact that they've tried to hide all this in using
international bodies using policy of foreign countries
to hide their own actions.
Now, we ha we recently did a show on May 13th called Zionism
is settler Colonialism because it verifiably is.
And in this discussion we went to their own statements.
We went to the proof from the Zionist organization
highlighting exactly what they were doing for, to,
from UN documents, literally highlighting not only that
that was their direction,
but this is what they were publicly doing.
This is what they named it. This is not even for debate.
You can literally see it still happening as they continue
to push out Palestinians in the West Bank and take their PR
or all of gods at this point.
But I wanted to start before we get into the conversation
of Rafa, which we're gonna start with an interesting point.
So we understand not it's one major, part of what this is,
is about the expanding the expansionism,
the settler colonialism of
what the Zionist project has always been.
And as those very people are pointing at the other groups
as the ones that will take over the world,
should we not stop them Russia and,
and anybody else, all
of a sudden Hamas apparently is gonna take over the world if
we don't stop them, even as Israel's publicly
and constantly talking about,
at least within their own circles, how they will do that
or how the AV movement that they fund will do that.
We'll spread the white race
around the world once we stop Russia.
That's their statements, but we pretend it doesn't make any
sense because they, we just misunderstand.
They're not Nazis despite their SIGs, theirs, their salutes,
and they're Nazi symbols.
No, you must understand, but we're funding them anyway.
So we wanna make you understand that the people
that they're working with is including the Zionist
organization, are actively doing that
as they pretend other groups are.
And this is called the Greater Israel Project.
If you want the best example of this recently just denounced
as racism by some random person in the Israeli government
while smokes just gave a speech in front of a podium
with the greater Israel symbol on it.
How embarrassing. But let's start with this.
Dylan Griffith played the shared this clip.
It's a 32nd clip, former IDF spokesman says
that Israel's borders will continue to expand
until they take over and purify mecca.
This is not a unique belief, guys.
This is a very, very, very prominent belief
that they just kind of don't want you to pay attention to.
That's the reality.
- Our borders will extend from Lebanon to the Great Desert,
which is Saudi Arabia, and then from the Mediterranean
to the Euphrates
and who's on the other side of the Euphrates, the Kurds
and the Kurds are our friends.
So we have the Mediterranean behind us, the Kurds in front
of us Lebanon, which really needs the umbrella
of protection of Israel.
And then we're gonna take, I believe we're gonna take, uh,
Mecca Medina and Mount Sinai
and purify those places. You know,
- It's gonna purify.
That's the, that that's some fascist id some state.
I mean like, think about the things they try to make out
to be Nazis, Nazi Hamas, Nazis, pro-Palestine, Nazis,
as they literally talk about purifying areas.
It's just gross how obvious this is.
Now just a couple other clips down below,
or I mean, uh, uh, tweet down below.
He just simply says, look at the map
and know that this is just their short
term plan, which is the truth.
The Talmud tell, uh, tells, lays out the long-term strategy
and far worse than this.
Now it does, there's plenty of overlap to this,
but let's realize that just because whether it's Talmud or
or any other, you know, whether it's a, uh, Quran
or the the Bible, that there's plenty of things in there
that people would argue as well, that, you know,
that's from a long time ago and not everybody believes that,
or most people seem to don't.
We recognize it's archaic, whatever.
So it's just not a across the board belief,
but the Zionist belief is 100% that this is
what they're driving across the board.
You can talk, you, you can highlight this in a
countless different ways.
I still argue that that's a Zionist entity manipulating the
concept for its own benefit,
but it definitely could be wrong.
In fact, on that note, since this is the conversation we
recently had with Adam, I'm gonna be on a show
with Adam tomorrow talking about the
censorship as well as Rafa.
But it's important to recognize at the very least that that
that discussion point, right?
'cause there is a very big difference, even if you argue
that historically or even very recently,
the overlap is impossible to dis to differentiate between.
You could still point
out that there are two different things.
The idea of a random Jewish person in one part of the world
and the Zionist organization, whether Jewish
or not acting through that.
I'm still very much convinced that Zionism
and many levels is using Judaism to,
to carry out its agendas.
But I know people disagree with that.
But see, what's important is we should not let
that be the dividing factor.
We all recognize what they're doing is wrong.
That's where we should be focusing on,
especially when you can tell, as I'm openly saying
that my honest, my stance is to honestly find that truth,
even if it ends up being opposite of what I think,
not just holding onto the one thing I think is the case
and driving that in no matter what, which is
what you get from partisan manipulators.
But he also highlights the great Truman clip we just
recently played where he simply highlights the idea
that they've wanted to take it over and it was Palestine
and all these basic things that we can prove.
And he goes, it's not just the us Most major Western powers
have had the hand in this England participated in the
establishment of an Israeli ethnostate using central banks
in place around the world
to siphon wealth from the lower and middle classes.
I mean, this is classic US foreign policy
or just foreign policy of many countries.
But here's what gets even more specific.
You may think, oh, that's just
one guy and it's an old thing.
Well, here is the leader of their current settler movement
for Gaza, specifically for Gaza.
This is the woman that has been screaming about
how they're going to take over Gaza
and that she, there was one
where she looked right at the camera and said,
Biden, listen to me.
You know, and this person is not a representative,
but let's be clear, she has power.
This is a very, a major representative
of the settler project.
And she is the leader according
to the people in Israeli circles from the government as well
as from the media covering it.
So this is not some fringe random thing.
This is a woman who has ma a lot
of influence in the settler colonial project.
What's important is that she's openly,
publicly without like not even mincing words,
we will take other parts
of other countries once we're done
here. Here's what she says.
- Say to me, why don't you explain to the Jews
in the United States, uh, what is exactly
behind you thinking?
I explain, but , I I'm laughing
because the the right word for it.
You have to brainwash all the time.
You have to say to explain it, to live it, to cope with it.
My husband says to me, why do you speak
to your children all the time about Zionism pioneers in
Judean America, settling and settling
and all my family are settlers here because this
- Illegal period, what we're talking about is illegal,
settling, settling guys.
This is not 1960, this is not 1948.
We're talking about currently now taking
new area in the West Bank.
There is no one in the world other than Israel.
And there, I mean, in the next few of, uh,
like I'm thinking from like a government perspective,
even then a few individuals like the Grams or the cottons
or the mass of the world to Brian Mass who argue that's not,
but from a legal perspective, every angle, I mean even Trump
and Biden to a degree have kind
of at least try avoided acknowledging
that they're a crime for me.
I realize Biden or uh, excuse me, Pompeo was the one
that kind of said that they were not necessarily out of line
with international law or something really manipulative like
that didn't say they're okay,
but we didn't say they're wrong either.
It's inherently illegal. There's no way around it.
And this is what they're trying
to water this conversation down with by acting like,
by trying to ignore the history, the right of return, unre
and the documents of what they're keeping track of,
which is the fact that
after a war, if areas occupied, the law states
that you're supposed to give back the area
to the people that were displaced.
And even in the 1967 discussion, the borders
that were agreed to, that Israel was aligned with,
it says right in the document that the,
the number one thing was Israel had
to remove itself from the areas that were supposed to be.
They didn't, it's the easiest thing in the world to prove.
They just don't care. People like Pompeo
and the rest of them just act like it doesn't exist.
Even though they're very aware of it,
they're shockingly dishonest.
Which, you know, somebody,
Mr. Reed live, we cheat, we steal Pompeo.
This shouldn't be a shock, but they're the
ones acting like there's not a problem.
Now Biden put that back, made it, you know,
basically it's just, it's all just words.
'cause they were allowing it to happen anyway,
but put it kind of shifted it
back to say, well, it's illegal.
It is illegal. There's no way around it.
You're occupying new, you're displacing yet again,
taking new territory, building illegal settlements on places
that were, I mean, even from the very beginning,
it's all Palestine, but now doing it for a second time
and violating the, the pr the next agreement
where they said that would be the next case.
I mean, look, even if they wanna pretend that it's
because Hamas is fighting and we can't allow the settlement
or the, the peace agreement because Hamas
and Palestine won't let it, there's not some opening there
to go, then we'll just take it.
The idea is that it would then stay that way until
that half goes away, and then you still allow the
agreement that you've agreed to.
So every angle about this is dishonest.
So she's telling you right now that we are going
to continue doing this, and guess what she says next,
more than just Gaza, this is
- The only way to continue Zionism.
I want to have for the Jewish nation.
- Not, not Judaism, but Zionism
- Promised land from the Bible, from the Fri uh, prat.
- Yes, yes - To the Nile. And uh, I'm sure it'll be, what
- About Southern Lebanon?
- If it's, it is part of it, all of it.
See, even parts of Syria, part of Iraq, part
of Iran, it's a, it's huge.
- You think you have any way of convincing people
that that would be a good idea?
- I convince many, many people believe in it.
I don't see anything, uh, um, like, uh,
anything extreme in my approach.
It's the basic Jewish approach.
- Well, look at that. I, it's, it's,
she's being being very straightforward, right?
And her, and the only idea, the mindset is, well,
this is our God ga this is our historical God.
And look, even if you believe that, that's not the law,
that's not how this works.
And also that's not true. It's very easy to prove.
But either way, you're talking about territory even
before all this, that was Palestine that they lie about.
But even after that, again,
they've already made an agreement in 67 about the di the,
the, you know, Gaza West Bank
and other areas which are supposed to end up being a two A.
So a state for Palestine, you can't just keep taking this.
Or what about even further Iraq and Syria and Iran?
How are you rationalizing the idea that that's not extreme,
that we're just gonna casually take
what are you just gonna stand back and give it to you?
No, that means war, that means bombing,
that means terrorism, which is always
how Zionism has achieved its goals over the years.
Absolute terrorism, without question. Unbelievable.
This is the Greater Israel project
and we're pretending it's, it's going to be Iran or Russia,
or it certainly could be, I'm not saying
that those countries or those governments aren't capable of
that, but we're talking right now about the very people
pointing at everybody else who are actively
and openly telling you that's what's gonna happen.
And this is not just the settlers smoke rich vir.
Even Netanyahu in certain circumstances has made this
shockingly clear, this is where we are.
So keeping this in mind,
and also by the way, this,
this great article from Matt ETT in December 5th, 2023 will
give you a better insight into this.
The Greater Israel scheme
and its global power play, a delusional recipe
for Armageddon is a great article.
Now let's go from there into the Rafa conversation.
So let's make sure we understand
what we're dealing with, right?
People that covet this territory, that want this
for their own purposes, whether you think
that in their minds, they think they're right by God
or not, killing children
to do it doesn't seem very godly to me.
So let's talk about what just happened here.
Now, un as Tara highlights,
and again, this is, there's, this is kind
of a little bit over all over the place in regard
to the timeline, because let's be clear
that there's a lot that's built up to this.
And I don't even mean just in the general larger story.
I mean, just over the last couple of days, the game
that was played about how the rockets were fired
and realize how embarrassing it is that I keep, many
of you have seen this where I keep highlighting the fact
when people like David Coley
or the rest of them over the last weeks, by the way, post
mole rockets just fired, they're lying about that.
And I prove I've proven this many times.
They just make these statements up to justify,
to make it seem like they're under attack.
What's hilarious about it in Mac Cobb sort of way is
that even IDF
and even corporate news, I believe it was either AP
or BBCI forget highlighted the fact
that they had an I I've said this many times
after three months, rockets being fired was quote,
exceedingly rare because they quote ran out.
Okay? Now doesn't mean that they didn't have some later
or made some LA or had some other way to do it,
but the point is, they have been exceedingly rare up
until very recently when they fired more, which appar,
which did in fact happen.
But the point is that that's acknowledged by the ITF
and the corporate media, and they just lie about this.
And I don't even know why these individual propagandists
online think that they, I, I mean I,
it seems like they all have an interest in just
whatever they can do to make the story look good for Israel.
So I keep highlighting it, you're lying. It's not true.
There was no evidence of it,
there was nothing you could see.
And then all of a sudden they got fired
and they made a big story about it.
Oh, they fired all these rockets.
Well, if they have been this whole
time, why is that a big story?
All of a sudden, you see, it's just lie upon, lie upon lie.
But what's important to understand about this,
and Sam Husseini made good points about this,
and Robert has confirmed the same thing we're gonna talk
about today, is that the rockets
that were fired were fired from in between two IDF
locations, not from a civilian area.
And this is verifiable just like it's verifiable,
that will prove to you that they in fact bombed the very
location that they told these people to go to from Rafa.
Now we're not talking about the other 14 times
as this happened, the same old story
where they bombed the safe area
that's horrifying in its own ride.
We're talking about recently from Rafa.
They said, we're about to go after Rafa
and this is the supposed plan,
so we want you to go over here.
And they went over there and then they bombed the
hell out of that area.
Eight, eight ra eight bombs, as far
as I understand it, massive bombs.
This is what's going on.
And so to understand all of this, we have to realize
that the game that they're playing about the rockets
and so on is about trying to create the illusion
that this was in somehow always self-defense.
Imagine carrying out genocide for eight months
and then having some rockets fly, which as far
as I can tell, didn't cause any death.
And then carrying out a massive bombing of civilians.
But then at the same time,
pretending like you only pinpoint targeted the Hamas members
that we were going after or somehow was all human shield,
not just a belligerent child-like effort
to stomp your feet about
how the ICJ nobody else can stop you.
So here we're gonna kill a bunch of
civilians like you told us not to.
It's horrifying. But here's to us, to, uh,
y Tori highlighting a huge massacre in Rafa.
This was posted yesterday, as in at least,
and the number seems to be somewhere between 35
and over 50 Palestinians murdered tens
of others injured in Israeli war planes targeted.
And we, by the way, we showed you one
of these examples in the last show was one
of the first ones that happened.
They bombed the tent right
after they were told not to bomb Rafa.
And it was a very clear shot of a random tent.
Now are Rita, believe there's tunnels all over these areas
and there, I mean, or where's the
Hamas member we're talking about?
I mean, it's the same narrative every time
he writes the corpses of children
and women are beyond recognition.
Some of the bodies were severely burned.
My colleague Mohammad Kassem
and Rafa, who has been covering the events on the ground
says this is the most gruesome massacre he has witnessed in
all of his years reporting.
He says, you see corpses of women, men
and children burn a front our eyes suggest 45 murdered.
Now here guys, with there is some gr I should have said
ahead of time, we're gonna, there's some.
Now I I usually don't even get into this, the level of gr
of, of shocking images we're gonna show
because a lot, often I don't find it to be
journalistically necessary to show you the worst things
that we can see other than shock.
And, you know, the shock value to it, which is disgusting.
This is what corporate media does.
The whole, it bleeds, it leads kind of an angle.
IIIA poor that.
But I find it important sometimes
to make sure we truly understand the
nature of what just happened.
And this is one of those times.
So I'm just gonna get ahead of time.
If your children watching,
please don't let them look at this.
There's some really, the kind of things I've said
before that are going to sit with me the rest of my life
here is Rami Abdul from the Hu Yed Human Rights Group.
He is the chairman graphic in the deadliest response
to the International Court of Justice's
decision, which is what this is.
The Israeli army targeted a group
of displaced persons tents in Rafa killing.
He says, approximately 60 lives,
you've got dead children burned alive.
Now, I just don't know how we can pretend that
that's somehow kind of human shield dynamic
or that you argue that that's somehow justifiable
because you claim elsewhere that was happening despite none
of this being verifiable.
And that what we're seeing being rampant all over the place
and what you're seeing is this fenced area within that are,
were tents and civilians.
I mean, this was directly targeting.
And what we're talking about right here, guys,
is the area they were told to go.
And I will prove this to you, I'll prove it to you
with their po, their statements, their posts,
their pictures, and even
after that claiming that, look, this was where we bombed
and claiming it wasn't there.
And I'll show you both of them.
This is how desperate and how blatant these people are.
The heads of Palestinian children
and infants are being blown off
by Israeli airstrikes in Rafa as Rami Abdul the young.
This is the among the deadliest crimes in response
to the international court of justice, justice.
Now this is an image of a dead child
with his head blown off.
Okay? Now there are already people
pretending this is not real.
Oh, we can tell it's a doll that kind
of disgusting reality going around the internet,
Marty children in Rafa due
to the Israeli bombing, these are dead.
These are children that were murdered in what just happened.
These are infants guys Now realizing the discussion about
what we're talking about over the, the discussion
of what's happening or what happened on October 7th,
the lies about 40 beded babies
or 40 15 babies on a clothes line or a baby in an oven
or a baby over and all of them turned out to be lies.
And we can have the Bbu family
who was taken, which were crimes.
Hamas committed a crime. And the point is
that when they were there, they were murdered
by Israeli bombings, which in case you don't remember,
we've talked about a lot, and I post this under every time,
including one that was just posted by, uh,
vi Aviva Kpa again, that they know this, they know this.
Not only because I post it every time
or Michael Mikey Rappaport and the rest of them, but
because this has been a public story,
the Bibas father himself said
that they were killed by IDF bombs.
We have Dan Cohen who highlighted the fact
that even the CBS Morning show was forced to admit
that they were by Israeli strikes on the show.
It's not hard to recognize guys, they're lying.
And that point is, those were the only children that I know
of, that they were that level in regard to age.
And then we have the two
that we can verifiably claim were killed on
what happened on October 7th,
one of which was after the fact.
One in regard to shooting, which we don't know wasn't an IDF
bombing or shots, that's just being objective.
Certainly could have been Hamas,
but keeping that in mind, recognizing
that we have 15,000 children that have been killed
so far in what's going on.
And what we're dealing with are these kind
of children being killed, tiny infants that are being killed
or the six in the incubators they left
to die at the other hospital
or the endless, endless amount of children.
We keep seeing suffering.
I just don't know anyone who can pretend they're standing
by this who is not an obviously disgusting person,
newborn baby, burnt alive in Rafa.
This is real. I would not show it to you if it was not.
And this pains me that this is even happening.
General strike highlights,
Terence Daniel highlights the tent massacres.
The, the majority of those killed
last night were women and children.
And unfortunately the majority were burned alive.
Now this is, I forget her name off the top of my head.
She, she was the one that we covered early in this,
that was on average.
She's a random person guys.
She was a random Palestinian that was there with her phone
and had she just broke down, if you remember
that we covered this, was she just broke down crying.
What is going on? How is this possible?
And ever since then has been motivated
to cover what's going on in the ground.
And this is powerful, the kind of thing that they,
they've created a lifelong intel intelligent
and honest journalist, right?
I mean, I, in the context of anybody could, you know,
my point is right now she's honest
and very clearly you can tell
because what she's doing is putting herself in danger
to highlight what you can see.
And she's not making allegations. She can't back up.
She's talking to people, she's showing you this.
But as always question everything no matter what,
whether left or right, up or down Hamas or,
or Israel, whatever else, or Palestinian.
But here's what she's telling you
she's seen and what's on the ground.
And by the way, this is easily verified with
what they've admitted what you can see from video,
- If this had a smell, I'm smelling it right now.
Behind me is a bumping happened last night in a displacement
spot in a area around me are, uh, tents
where people are still inside these tents
because they, uh, that they, they, they were told
that they are in a safe area, which is a moi, okay?
Outside of Refa is there
while they are still in the Moe area.
Last night, this, uh, bombing by five to six rockets,
as people told me, resulted in the killing of 40
to 50 people at night.
And, um, of course the injury of
- A lot while they were sleeping.
- These people, people are so afraid, some of them
are moving as you see there, that in there, some
of them are moving, some of them cannot move.
They are just moving from this area to
that area like this woman.
But the thing is,
and the main question is where to go,
where people should go.
If the bombing is all over around us,
where should people go?
The humanitarian zones are a lie. Where should people go?
This is the main question
because these people who were killed
and also were injured are Yanni people out
of more than 45,000 people were killed.
Uh, most of them in the south in safe zones.
So what to do now?
- So guys, I have just asked the neighbors, uh,
who talk the marchers
and the injuries yesterday from the bombing
and the tents near to the honor warehouses in Atu,
the field hospitals also in Rafa.
They told me that the majority of the people who were killed
and injured were children and women.
And the majority of them died because of being burned alive.
Unfortunately, the rockets burned, uh, the tents that, uh,
where, where they were sleeping
- While they were sleeping.
Think about that. Your whole argument is
that you wanna do the, you want to protect the safe,
get them outta the way and evacuate them,
and then they don't move
because they don't know where else to go.
And you go, well, now they're guilty
'cause they didn't move, right?
We'll just quietly sneak up
and bomb them in their tents at night.
That seems like the, the logical next step, the, you know,
human shield, Hamas, they voted for him, didn't they?
Isn't this where we're going in this absurd dynamic
where we just rationalize the murder of innocent people
because, well, they didn't get outta the way.
I can't believe anybody with integrity
or on, I mean, that's the point.
They're lacking integrity
or some kind of a human soul that they can pretend like any
of this makes any sense whatsoever.
Now, if you think they can just go
on the beach or anywhere else.
Don't forget that they get shot on the beach from the water,
from the beach itself, from anywhere else they're being
killed, anywhere they go.
Think about how ho, how horrifying that is.
Think about what that life must be like.
Any moment anywhere you go,
you could be killed going for food.
The flower massacre. We can be anything you do.
This is a torture game for these people, it seems.
And as they're doing that, they're laughing in their homes,
they're eating their food, they're burning their houses
down, they're making videos, wearing their lingerie.
This is what's really going on.
This is the life of a Palestinian right now in
the West Bank and Gaza.
Now, Rami Abdul also highlights that these are the people
who were burned alive by Israel while trying to escape
and displaced person's tents.
They were burned by Israel in a camp
that was supposed to be safe.
The most brazen response to the decisions
of the highest international court.
This is what we're dealing with.
And your government seem to be completely okay with that.
Muhammad Alah al Soften also points out a pretty
horrifying overlap to this.
The best treatment that survivors who just got lucky enough
to not die, or possibly maybe not.
If you're burned all halfway over your body,
you're probably not feeling
you're very lucky to survive that.
The point is, the best treatment for the survivors
of the Rafa Massacre can expect the,
the best they can expect is
that la the last remaining hospital,
there's no pain meds.
Some places don't even have gauze.
They don't have anything that they actually need.
It does not have an ICU reminder of this testimony.
Who the, what she,
what she basically says is she's in medicine.
Mary, imagine having at any hospital a shift overnight
with back-to-back mass casualties where 25
to 30 injured people at once arrive every few hours.
And you have first year medics just outta medical school.
And he goes, yeah, I
wouldn't even know how to, how to triage.
I wouldn't know what to do. He says,
that is what we're dealing with.
The most high resource hospitals in the world.
Large hospitals with ERs
that are practically empty would be completely overwhelmed
to struggle to deal with one of these, one
of these mass casualties.
One. And we would get multiple over the course of a shift.
The brain dead. The brain drain is real.
And it's happening because the
population has been strangulated.
A lot of people, if they choose
to stay alive, choose to leave.
And many of those who choose to stay
or do not have the option of leaving
or being killed, they do not have what they need to survive.
As well as the fact that two journalists who were there
covering the safe zone were killed.
But seeing as how it's, what is that,
150 journalists now doesn't even seem to matter
because they're all Hamas, right?
Isn't that easy just to blithely dismiss their entire lives,
their dreams, their families?
It's all Hamas. Doesn't even matter, does it?
That's who we're dealing with.
Now, realize that we just talked about this.
The Israel and the United States
blatantly disregard the ICJs binding international legal
obligations as Sam Hussein lies
in the pursuit of their genocide.
The reality is that this is unquestionable.
We have to understand that the International Court
of Justice, the conversation is about whether
or not it applies and realize that Palestine, regardless
of the screams and cries of Israel in the United States,
is accepted into that conversation because of the ICJ
and Palestine's agreement a while ago.
So they can scream all they want.
It doesn't change the reality. So they're part of that.
So that means that other, when they then rule
that this is bind that they have to stop, it is binding
because Israel is operating in that zone.
On top of that, it requires that other people in the world
that are bound by this, the Geneva Convention,
or excuse me, the, the Genocide Convention,
are then legally required to act, to stop it.
And they didn't care. The same people screaming about
rules-based international order
or blinken clumsily arguing that the difference between them
and Hamas is that they care about international law.
And then international law says, don't.
And they go, we don't care. You're not real.
People are shockingly coming, becoming aware of one
of the most, I I mean, I don't even know the,
I don't even know those words big enough to frame
what is actually falling apart right now.
This is the entire worldview.
People are losing control of the entire construct,
and it's shaking people free
of far more than just this conversation.
And the point is that they said you have to stop,
but they did this anyway.
In fact, they did this because they were told to stop.
Now, here's the craziest part about this,
and I'll show you an article about this in a second.
They bombed Rafa 60 times,
60 times in the last 48 hours,
or rather just in the 48 hours after,
before this was posted, which was basically midnight
or 1:00 AM to this morning.
The point is, guys, if you're gonna try
to pretend this was about going
after these two Hamas members, explain to me
how you bombed 60 times six zero.
Six zero. So are we to pretend that each one
of those was targeting a Hamas member,
but how if there was only two, how does that make sense?
Anybody wanna explain that?
Other than the obvious example, the obvious reality
that this was 60 indiscriminate bombs into a pub,
a refugee camp, full people, they're in,
what they were told was the safe zone.
There's just no way you can do the math
and pretend that that's 30 targeted bombs
to each one person they were going
after then realized that it wasn't 30 bombs in two separate
locations, right?
Otherwise, that if,
if it was 30 bombs in two separate locations,
you might just argue that they just used too many bombs
to kill each one of those people.
By the way, people that we have
yet to confirm were even there.
But then when you realize that it wasn't 30 bombs in one
location, 30 bombs in another location, they bombed a, uh,
multiple locations, you then realize that at the very least,
they bombed somewhere where there wasn't Hamas number
or they were guessing about all of them.
Every one of these examples
shows you that they're breaking the law.
I mean, the entire argument shows you in the law,
it's all collective punishment.
Even the human shields argument
that seemingly everybody in this collective West government
side has argued, doesn't make it a le a a legal act.
People like Francesca Albany.
So the un entirely have made it clear.
Collective punishment is the what's happening here.
It doesn't matter whether it's human shields
or not, you're bombing collectively.
You're acting against the entire population.
No wound, no, no fought, no water, no food, no fuel.
It's obvious 50 people burned alive.
Greg j Stoker highlights.
And that showed you the videos here of children.
It's horrifyingly sad.
They dropped a 2000 pound dumb bomb on a refugee camp in
Rafa after the ICJ ruling.
And as he said, and I agree, this is what a genocidal,
tamper tantrum looks like.
This is what your governments are not just allowing,
are standing by.
Make sure you do not forget the people
that are standing aggressively by this.
At the very least. And I do not believe, I mean, call,
I'm a pessimist in a card of government.
I, I jaded when it comes to what these people are.
My point is that even somebody like Joel Stein
who was standing up and saying, this is wrong.
I don't believe that these people truly, I mean,
where were you on the first month?
Where were you on the first day? It's, it was self-evident.
What was happening? It took months
before you stand up and go, this is wrong.
Or maybe I missed it. She was doing it earlier.
I don't know. The point is, I don't have a feeling
that these people truly care about this.
But I will, I'll point to them.
I'll say, good, I'm glad you'll Stein is saying that.
But there are very few of them
that are even braved enough to say it.
Most of them are blindly supporting this.
And in regard to it, in one example of it,
22 Palestinians were slaughtered in Israeli massacre
targeting the families displaced near
and on re barracks Israeli aircraft targeted their tents at
the UN site tell all Ultan area of west of Rafa.
Now here's a clip from a corporate,
I believe it's Australian channel
or no, it was, uh, BBC, excuse me.
I find this to be telling the Gaza Health Ministry says
35 people were killed.
This was the early preliminary statements.
This was early this morning at the explosion
explosion in Rafa.
It's just so ridiculous how even when they're covering this,
they can't say Israel bombed it,
even though Israel already said they did.
And we'll get into that old dynamic too, how immediately all
of the Zionists manipulators online were screaming
that it was a Hamas rocket until IDF claimed it.
And then they were like, oh, oh, nevermind.
I thought we were supposed to lie about that, right?
Yeah, they do that every single time.
But here's how they cover this.
And there's important statements that are made.
- It's Monday, the 27th of May.
Our main story, the Hamas Run Health Ministry in Gaza says
35 people have been killed
and dozens injured in an explosion at a
refugee camp near Rafa.
- The Israel Defense Force said it had carried out an
airstrike targeting a compound
where senior Hamas officials had gathered,
- Oh, a compound, I guess we're calling
tents compounds. Now.
- It said it is now reviewing the incident
after reports that civilians had also been harmed.
- Oh no, they're reviewing it. Oh, they're reviewing it.
Well, let's see how that's working out.
Okay, so they said they're reviewing the investigation.
Or rather what really happened was their representative said
outwardly that they would investigate without
any kind of confirmation.
Like Biden or Matt Miller always
says, well, they're investigating.
And even though they already said they don't need to
and they never will, it's all a bunch of circular lies.
But here's what actually happened, okay?
This was hours later,
the occupation forces pledged to investigate itself.
Chief Military prosecutor, gen Major General Tam Yami
dismisses the massacre as a difficult consequence of war.
That's what actually just happened, of course,
in a war such of magnitude and intensity.
She says there are also difficult events.
Some of the events such
as the incidents last night in Rafa are very difficult.
The details of the incident, she says
yesterday are still being investigated.
The point though is they're already coming out
and going, well, it was just a part of war.
We were going after the bad guys.
You have to realize that
there's not an investigation happening.
The investigation is to say, we're having an investigation.
They've already told you the narrative.
We went after Hamas over here,
and then either Hamas made a mistake
or, you know, whichever one ends up being the thing.
People think most we'll go with that.
The point is, they've already argued that it was
because they were going after the two people.
What's the investigation? What, what are we talking about?
You killed people. We can see that.
So, because civilians died in the process,
what are you actually investigating?
I'd love to see anything actually come
of any one of these ever.
They never do. And yet your government will stand by it.
Elijah mania also points out
that there were two Egyptians soldiers
that were killed at the RFA border.
Now this gets especially interesting when you find out why
he says, deploying more than four Israeli infantry
battalions or positioning tanks, artillery
and anti-aircraft missiles in Zone D would breach the
19 78, 19 79 Camp David Treaty, which of course,
Israeli government or these settlers that believe
that's all their territory anyway,
because God said, don't care about any of these things,
un resolutions or any of this stuff.
They'll violate everything.
There's multiple resolutions from the past
that they right now are violating.
It says Israel has an entire division
operating on the Egyptian borders.
They're breaking the law everywhere you look guys.
And nobody seems to care
because there's something very dark happening right now.
Or rather, I would argue something of growing positivity
because they're losing control of that very dark thing.
We can see that there's something controlling the output,
the conversations, the thought process
of foreign government leaders,
or they're equally invested in whatever's happening here.
However you wanna look at it. But now that's breaking down.
But here's the interesting part about this.
Merch owes sent points out.
The Egyptian soldiers reportedly acted independently.
Apparently some of them were killed as they were affected
by the massacre, committed by the occupying forces,
or at least that's what's being reported.
Sources told daily news of Egypt
that the Egyptian soldiers were so affected by
what they were seeing that they chose to act.
Think about that. So this is,
this is what we're calling on, guys.
We're calling on the humanity, the people out there,
whether you're part of a military, part of a police force,
part of a political party that you know,
you care if you see this and you know it's wrong.
Now is the time to stand up.
The people that are telling you it's okay.
Those are bad people.
These are people that are dark, that have something wrong
inside of them that are allowing us to continue.
And you know it's wrong that the fact
that you might be suppressing that is enough.
You should live with that the rest of your life.
Eight months of this. But you can tell it's wrong.
Now is the time to stand up
and change that, make up for that.
And this person says, like you have said,
it's not an issue of the Egyptian people.
It's an issue of the Egyptian leadership.
And I said the same thing.
We have to realize that the Egyptian people are very clear,
they're very clear about the Palestinian
self-determination side that they're on.
The government is the CC government that was put in place
by the US government in Israel.
It's, remember Trump famously, where's my favorite dictator?
That was something he publicly said in front of reporters.
Like, it's just shocking. We put these people in place
for the deals, the normalization with Israel
and all the different things they've done with the Sudan.
It's all about just aligning these groups with anything.
They can do whatever they want as long
as they pretend Israel's not murdering people.
It's not working. He says,
definitely these soldiers represent the Egyptian people.
They listen to the heart and burn.
It burns with desire of defending their brothers.
That's powerful to me guys.
These people just, they died broke, broke regulations
or some kind of, you know, orders logic, I would imagine
by doing something about it.
We all need to be doing that.
And I'm not talking about violence here.
I'm talking about just taking, finding the courage
to act in a way that might end up with detriment.
There might be consequences to your actions,
whether they're unjustified or not,
because of how wrong all of this is.
I mean, look at what's happen. Look
at what we started out talking about.
I mean, do you, do you realize, like I said
before in a previous show, like I have no doubt in my mind
that this is not, I, I this is going to end up in,
I I'm gonna live with the consequences of standing up
for this probably the rest of my life.
Unless we successfully change this in a worldwide way.
But that's okay with me. I don't know who can live
with not acting right now.
I know it guys. Gary, I probably will be bankless
and you know, probably actions
that will be po in a net positive for me
that I should be changing anyway.
But my point is that we are watching this happen, suppressed
and ced and financially controlled
and manipulated in ways
that are destroying things I've built
over the last decade plus.
But it's worth it. 'cause we're fighting for human life.
We're fighting for our integrity.
That's worth more than anything East Rafa,
after 20 days of Israeli presence.
Look at this, look at the difference.
It, they're wiping these people off the map.
That's supposed to be the safe zone.
And we're gonna get to where they actually bombed.
Here is the hospital speaking out on May 26th, 2024.
In blatant defiance of the International Court of Justice.
They say decisions and statements by US Presidential Biden.
The Israeli occupation committed a heinous massacre in
Rafa Clear.
It says, uh, of all the decisions of the international Court
of justice and the speech of us,
they're saying the same thing.
That they committed these crimes
against the Palestinian people.
He says, in the city of Rafa,
whereby the Israeli occupation challenges the entire world
through its massacres
and committing massacres, as the entire world warned that
against invading the city of Rafa.
But the Israeli aggression still invaded the city of Rafa.
And now today, it is committing a
ma heinous massacre against our people,
the Palestinian people, where more than 30 people have been
martyred, which just means killed
and more than 70
injured in a safe zone.
Oh, excuse me, I thought I muted it right there. My fault.
Hmm. So guys, these are,
these are just the people from the
hospital, the hospital staff.
But of course, because they speak out or
because they might be Palestinian, there's any number
of disgusting dismissals
that people will put forward about who they are.
This one last on this, this segment here, this is
what it looks like after the fact.
He said, this is what the UK, us
and the Israelis do to babies,
women, children, and innocent civilians.
They are killers and you need to stop them.
This is from Shaman Solomon, massive destruction in a camp
for displaced people in Rafa.
Here's what it looks like now.
Oh, look, Instagram censored our,
our post good big surprise.
And we're to believe this is going after two people.
This is two ha members.
God, just, just look at that.
I mean, guys, that this utterly
destroyed, this was all on fire.
People burned alive in these tents.
Now this person just simply highlights the point about,
you know, looking at this chaos that was happening.
That's, that's what you're looking at right there. It was
those same areas, was a blaze.
The whole area was on fire. People burned alive.
Children, women. So was they, he simply asked the question,
was this worth to Hamas officials?
I mean, I, I question whether they're even there guys,
or even whether they even care if they're there.
But what, even if, let's just say there was five.
Was it, does it make that make sense?
I don't know anybody with a brain
who can make that make sense.
'cause somehow it's okay to go
after this many innocent people because they were there.
And then of course, realize that if they bombed 60 times,
that you can make the clear deductive logic case
that there didn't know that they were there.
Or at least didn't know exactly where.
So they bombed a bunch of innocent people.
There's just no way around this.
And here's the one of the articles you can look,
there's plenty of coverage on this Israeli bomb Rao over 60
times in 48 hours after the ICJ ordered them to stop.
Even the u eu foreign Minister has condemned the act saying
the ruling of the court in the Hague last week
must be implemented.
Israel continues the military operation.
It was asked to stop, ordered to stop.
The EU countries will discuss how to deal with the ruling.
We will advance the sending
of the EU task force to the border.
Rafa like there's, because they, it's, you can argue
that groups like this don't really care
and they only feel like they have to look like they care.
And this is a, a fruitless process
that wouldn't surprise me.
But you have to recognize even the fact
that they're saying these things that they're moving
into some kind of action is shocking.
For those of us that have been following this,
this is a huge deviation from what used
to be complete dismissal from major acts.
This is important to see.
And the more that we lean into this, the more that we
as individuals highlight the fact that we care about this,
that whether they care or not, they're gonna see the reality
that they have to keep going forward.
Opportunists. Now, Marriott, uh,
on the scene from 9 7 2 magazine highlights an important
point high, uh, quoting what Hagar Maar pointed out.
Fuso executive director at 9 7 2 Magazine,
seeing the carnage in Rafa.
He posted this today and the Israeli justification for it,
he says, I'm reminded
of our findings in the lavender investigation,
which is the AI program sources told, then told
you all Abraham, the, the writer, the Army, was willing
to accept 20 civilians killed
for even lower ranking Hamas members
and up to 300 for seniors.
I mean, look, they, they claim they killed 200 people in GI
refugee camp for one senior official who wasn't even there.
In case you forgot, here's the actual article itself.
In an unprecedented move, according to two of the sources,
these are IDF sources.
The Army also decided during the first weeks
before it ever got to where it is now, that
for every junior Hamas operative, they would be permissible
to kill 15 to 20 innocent people.
That's not international law guys. That's a crime.
That's a, that's acknowledging that policy. That is a crime.
It's a war crime. There's no way around it.
I can't believe this is still happening with how
shockingly clear this is.
Read this again, if you don't remember Lavender,
the AI machine directing Israel's bombing Spree and Gaza.
And this is coming on top of the article from
before that was about the gospel, the hob soah program,
which was about general building locations.
And this was specifically bombing individuals based on the
most benign and name things.
Oh, you had a phone call in the same location as a guy
that we think of some moss bomb that guy.
Ridiculous stuff like that.
It's horrible, but it shouldn't be surprising
as have we've been seeing it the entire time.
Now, Maria points out, it also gives justification
for their adversaries to do the same, which by the way,
is probably one of the reasons they're doing this.
'cause of course, they're, they're hoping, like usual,
the people on their side will just ignore what they did.
But of course, if they do the same thing reverse,
it'll be justification to do it all
over again because they started it.
That's the whole damn story.
Now, Moham Shidah points out the lies they're
spinning, and next we're gonna get into the location
where we can prove that they told them
to go where they just bombed.
But the reality that they very clearly killed these people
and they're making up some ridiculous sidestep story.
I mean, the argument become, oh, some fires broke out.
Oops, we bombed this, this compound.
What, what compound are we talking about?
There's no compound in this mixing of tents.
You're talking about the tents themselves.
You're just making up this claim about some com.
The point is clearly that they murdered all these people
and now they recognize the fallout is just too much.
So they have to make up some kind of story.
That's the reactive propaganda we're seeing.
And we're gonna come to one in a minute where we have
to realize that he, even
Netanyahu has said this was a mistake.
That's according to Associated Press from today,
acknowledging a quote tragic mistake.
This they've lost control to ways you can't even imagine.
Anyway, excuse me. Now,
Mohammad Shih points out Israel's excuse
for beheading a baby, burning another
and blowing another into pieces last night.
Airstrike is a fire accidentally broke out.
Again, his point is that explain for us
how their bodies were b bombed if it was just a fire
that broke out tangential to this other thing you did.
They're lying guys. But like everything else he says,
they're not even trying anymore with their propaganda.
They know mainstream media will keep falling for their lies.
A fire broke out and spread to the tent complex.
That's what they said. Here is one of the,
this one is the former editor-in-Chief of the Jerusalem Post
says, it seems Palestinian civilians may have been
inadvertently killed by a fire, ignited
by an airstrike targeting Hamas terror leaders in Rafa
that we can can't identify and we can't verify,
but we'll just say it out loud.
Anyway, a terrible tragedy attributed
to Hamas' abhorrent practice of guess what?
Planting itself among civilians
and using 'em as human
shields who we didn't see that coming.
And he says, A soft MD highlights Israel bombs tense,
the tense ignite on fire alongside the civilians
inside sleeping regime.
Mouthpieces describe the massacre as an inadvertent tragedy.
Who would have known impromptu tense, made of random plastic
and cloth are flammable?
God, I mean, it's just, it's like there's something really,
there's something that can't even be verbalized
that they're, that sits with you with this.
When you just look at these people that can make this kind
of argument and know it's not
about the fact that they're Jewish.
There's plenty of non-Jewish people
that are doing the same damn thing.
There's something wrong here where they, I mean,
it's, it, it's as simple as that.
They just have been taught that Palestinians aren't human,
that aren't worthy of your concern.
And maybe they just dehumanize the point to
where they don't matter in their minds.
But I don't know if, I don't know how one person could reach
that level without that being something more about
who they are inside planting.
So it's all human shields, right?
But again, okay, so where are the humans? Then?
We see the shield you're suggesting was a shield.
Show me the human bud, Avi, where, where's the human part
of the human shield dynamic?
You realize there has to be a human behind the shield for it
to be considered a human shield, right?
You can't just pretend that they were there as shield,
but we bombed it even though Hamas wasn't there.
But there's still human shield
that doesn't really work out for you.
See, the reality is there's more than enough evidence
to highlight the fact that there is, I mean,
just taking the amount of people
that they even have admitted to being killed, right?
I mean, the US came out
and said that what 30% of Hamas has been killed?
That that, that in and of itself shows you that 20,000,
even if it's true, which I don't think their number is true
in regard to 30% of Hamas,
but let's just take it at value, means
that 20,000 people have been killed
that aren't Hamas, right?
Even the IDF Army
and Intelligence have admitted that the numbers
that they're getting from Gaza are accurate and reliable.
That's their quote. Okay?
And there's been studies that prove this too.
So if 20,000 people are killed, it's not hard
to do some math and realize that you can clearly show
that the amount of times they bombed to kill as many people,
there's not enough people that were with them
to call that human shield.
So, but it doesn't matter to them
because again, they, it, these narratives aren't working.
People have seen through this.
Here's APAC doing the same thing.
The images coming out of Rafa's night are horrific.
Do you think they mean that this terrible tragedy is a
result of Hamas' evil strategy,
of hiding its leadership fighters
and weapons beneath pa, Palestinian civilians, oh,
beneath them Now, were they in the dirt under their tents?
Hamas started this war by showcasing its disregard
for Israeli lives and everyday sense.
It also shows its disregard for Palestinian lives
by using them as human shields.
That's the only thing they have. Where's the evidence?
Well, Ian Carol points out literally an invading force force
bombing indiscriminately, which by the way,
you can watch on video quote, it's these people's fault.
We have to bomb them. What terrible
people to make us bomb them.
We feel so bad for having to bomb them.
That's what they're doing. Talk about desperation.
Now, here's the most interesting part
before we get into the verifiable reality
that they told them to go where they bombed, which did not,
which breaks the whole
narrative that they were Homa shields.
Anyway, is that, uh, Greg?
This, uh, I don't think this was,
this isn't, this isn't his account, right?
Oh, it is. I guess Greg j Stoker, I forgot his name.
He's the one that was, uh, I believe he was Special forces,
but he's been talking about this from the beginning.
He comes out and highlights the fact that just, I mean,
you could do this every time, by the way,
every time there's a new breaking story you can look to,
and I'm not talking like random 10
followers, Zionist bought accounts.
I'm talking about people like Elon Levy, Eli, David,
big major accounts, some
of which are actually official representatives, not Mr.
Fired Elon Levy anymore, but clearly I think he still is.
But either way, we're talking about high level accounts
that have official capacity that come out within moments
and scream the lie.
Whatever works for the narrative. Don't forget ha Hanya
Natali, the main propagandist guy came out
and said about the Ali Hospital, which is
what they highlighted even in this, in this video,
and claimed that it was, we
targeted because Hamas was there.
That was the first lie. Then it was like,
wait, no, sorry, no, nevermind.
It was the Hamas rocket. And then every one
of them since they've just been like, well, human shields,
okay, well if that was the argument,
then why didn't apply to the first one?
Because they weren't sure what
narrative would work just yet.
And the point was he lied, deleted the tweet, went forward.
Elon Levy got caught lying about the flower massacre
and said, we didn't shoot anybody.
We didn't get this straight. We didn't shoot,
they didn't shoot and then delete it at all
because the ha IDF said exactly the opposite.
Here in this example, you have people online already saying
that it was a Hamas missile or somebody else.
It wasn't even us. And then IDF claims it
and then they just back away from those lies.
I just don't know why. It's not
the most obvious thing in the world.
For some, it is for most everybody.
But there are still people that are just
desperately holding onto this.
- Israel just dropped a guided,
massive guided bomb unit on a refugee camp in the Tell
Sultan neighborhood in West Rafa, where civilians were told
to flee to after the IDF ground invasion of East Rafa
as Airstrike was conducted in retaliation against the
Rockets shot out of North Gaza into Tel Aviv.
And bear in mind that Israel's overriding military doctrine,
the DIA doctrine, is to collectively punish
civilians in order to pressure the associated
militant population. Which,
- And by the way, that's, and whether we're talking about
the Mowing the grass conversation
or any number of other policies, it's it's stated policy.
He's not wrong. It's very easy to look up.
They have collected punishment
as a stated, written out policy.
And we're not acknowledging that. It's crazy.
But the other thing is that whether we're talking about the
rockets that were fired or not, you realize
that you can't bomb and murder children for seven months
and act like that will act.
That started everything. It's the same as October 7th.
This has been going on for a lot longer than that.
So now all of a sudden they're just refreshing
and going, oh, that started it.
They shot. So we responded,
how are you possibly framing it like that?
I mean, how embarrassing. Nobody is gonna pretend
after you've been telling us you've been doing this
for eight months, that suddenly them firing rockets is
what started this whole thing.
How about the fact that if you are bombing them,
that why would they not have a right to fire back?
And on top of that, we have to realize
that this was an obvi.
I'll wait to get to it. Actually, there's a point
that Sam Hussei makes, which I find very relevant,
that it seems as if Hamas is working in the timeline along
with the international community.
The moment there's some kind of an agreement, they'll,
they, they ultimately stop.
And when there's an opportunity, when Israel doesn't do
what it's supposed to, they seem to respond.
And overall, where's the example of the fallout here?
Like I'm not saying that means they didn't try to bomb
or tax individual people certainly could have,
but the game is always the same.
They're indiscriminate rockets,
which is why they were crime.
Okay? I mean, that makes sense
because that means they could accidentally hit civilians,
therefore they shouldn't fire them.
Hmm. Okay. Then it becomes they targeted this person's home.
They went after this place here,
you just got done telling me they were indiscriminate.
And that's the case that they don't have guidance systems.
So again, it shows you that all
of this feels very manufactured.
And on top of that, where they fired from was literally in
between IDF locations.
And yet they pretended like they fired from civilian areas,
which is why they went on to murder people in Rafa.
But listen to what he says about the overlapping
propaganda, oops. Oh shoot,
- Rafa where civilians were told to flee to
after the IDF ground invasion
of East Rafa Airstrike was conducted in retaliation against
the rockets shot out of North Gaza into Tel Aviv.
And bear in mind that Israel's overriding military doctrine,
the DIA doctrine, is to collectively punish
civilians in order to pressure the associated militant
population, which is by definition a war crime.
And Boyd is the Israeli Hasbara volunteer Corps coming out
in force on this one.
There's like a fire in the refugee camp.
A GBU JDA won't produce such a blaze
unless they hit an ammo depot,
or this was a failed rocket launch by Hamas
as always operating from inside civilian areas.
Those are actually Hamas rockets,
which misfired landed on their own people,
just like the hospital explosion at the start of the war
through the PIJ rocket. Well,
- Now what he's doing for the podcast is reading all
separate individual tweets that were out by people, some
of them prominent making up stories.
And what they referenced right there was the Ali Hospital I
just talked about, which was a verifiable lie.
What they, they put out, they clearly attacked
the hospital, pretended it was something.
I mean, it's just constant, constant, constant.
- It was Hamas really not according to your own media,
why net news IDF strikes significant
terrorist compound Hamas claims, civilians hurt.
Army says attack carried out against the legitimate targets
under international law.
But these genocide apologists actually aren't wrong
because according to them, toddlers, little children
inside refugee camps are legitimate targets.
They're all terrorists. Just say it,
all the women and children are innocent.
Men are terrorists.
This one's gonna bite you in the fucking ass.
- Oh, excuse me, I forgot about that.
Pardon me for the cursing there.
The the point though, guys, is
that I'll show you the clip that I think he's referencing.
I mean it's, and by the way, we don't even need a new clip.
There's at least five examples
of high level Israeli representatives saying
the children aren't innocent.
That no one there is innocent.
That the children are, in fact, they,
I think the one woman said that the children are deserve
what they're getting or something like that.
And you, I played them all for you on this show.
We have another one. Now,
this person is saying nobody under the age of four,
over the age of four is innocent.
That's not a joke.
And I'll play it for you soon,
I think in the next segment here, here is one
of the most important parts of all of this.
This is where people, somebody should clip
out there to get this clipped out.
I mean, it's all over the internet, but it's important
to make sure we get as much reach on this as possible.
So Ksi highlights these Israel distributed
and published leaflets, which by the way,
this is in fact from that designated area, seven, three,
excuse me, 2, 3, 7, 1 as the safe area, which is written.
I'll show you directly from their posts contrasting
with what they then said.
One of the images highlighted blocks 2, 3, 7, 1.
They made people go to that area
and then that's where they just attacked.
Not as if it went by for months.
And they went, oh, now Hamas is there.
They said, go there to avoid the Raha operation
and then bombed them right after that.
This block is the exact location she writes.
That was targeted with a strike
by Israel in which more than 50
Palestinians were burned alive in Rafa.
Now here is a post from Ali Abu Ma from, uh, electronic Ada.
He says, four days ago the IDF told Palestinians in Rafa
to move to the area it called block 2, 3, 7, 1.
They designated the safe area.
And by the way, if you have been following the show
or any other for that matter, this is the, this is like the,
I mean, every time this happens,
I'll show you the New York Times
and Hart's article again, where they,
their own research when like, yep,
they keep bombing safe areas.
It's not a secret, but this is the most egregious so far.
This is the area Israel, in quotes,
just bond refugee tents carrying out a massacre.
Now, I'll show you this in a much better one
that shows you the, the exact location broke
down in the grids and everything.
Okay? But this is where, first of all,
they're claiming that they bombed.
That's what IDF and I'll show you again, is claiming,
but here is opposed.
That was put out by the IDF. Okay?
That very clearly includes the, the 2, 3, 7 1
as the areas they're supposed to go to first and foremost.
Now, she writes down here, here is the block marked in red.
Just so you, just so you can see the overlap.
And this is important 'cause we're gonna show you
what they're showing you from the ID from,
this is Colonel Peter Lerner.
Okay? So here is the area very clearly
and any, you can find countless maps of this.
There's 2, 3, 1.
That is the area that was just targeted right there. Okay?
And clearly this is one
of the areas they're saying is a safe area.
What she's saying is they issued explicit instructions
to the Palestinians directing them to move to that of one
of few specific blocks, which had been designated as safe.
Instead of providing security
and safety, they bombed them mercilessly.
So looking at this map, so we're very clear about
what we're talking about, compare this to
what Colonel Lerner is highlighting.
He says, this is where we struck, which by the way,
is very clearly in als.
That's the very, that's what they funneled everybody into
that, okay?
So just in case you're missing it for the podcast,
you wanna look at this, you know, watch the video.
Here's the overlap. Try
to get it close to close to each other.
It's so that you can see the white area is
where they're claiming is the humanitarian zone.
So on this map, they're going see it's outside of that zone.
Here is clearly 3, 2, 3, 7, 1, whatever, whatever,
whatever the yellow overlap they're claiming means.
The point is they told them to go there. This is verified.
Okay? It's very clear now, just
because they, they can act like,
whoops, it was a typo or something.
I bet you that's what they're gonna try to say.
Oh, well we, we figured it was outside the,
they still wrote it out and they still are.
And look, I don't know how you can write these numbers
and act like these are
safe going forward.
Oh, this one, back on this one.
Let's, so here's what he said.
Evaluation of fake news by mass manipulation by Hamas.
One quote in Washington post coverage
to the strike on Hamas terrace.
And Rafa caught my eye. It says the makeshift
camp was within block.
Here we are 2, 3, 7 1.
An area that was without question designated
as a humanitarian hate safe zone.
I mean, it's, it's not hard. You can look at it in their
post, which I just showed you, the leaflets
that were dropped, which you see screenshots of.
And it says Muhammad, uh, this,
basically all they're doing is saying, well,
he's a Hamas official, therefore he's a liar.
But we don't need his statement to verify this.
We can see leaflets that were dropped.
We can see DDF posts themselves
and it says he's also the source.
They're, that's all they're doing.
He was the source of this claim.
We don't need him to say it.
We can look at your posts
and the leaflets that were dropped.
It goes fact. The strike never took place in the designated
humanitarian zone, except we can
literally prove you're lying about that.
The aerial photograph of the point
that the strike compared to the humanitarian zone.
That's all they're showing. They're trying to pretend
that this one image makes it seem, well,
clearly it's not there, but you dropped the number
that said they were supposed to go there.
You drove them out of this whole area.
And by the way, this whole area has been bombed.
Con Eunice, the whole thing across the board.
It has been bombed relentlessly the entire time.
How long have I been showing you bombing inside of Rafa long
before the alleged game of some kind of a plan?
That's the how's very easily proven.
It says the Washington Post should have checked this
verifiable quote again.
It wouldn't surprise me that they just
blindly took what someone told them.
But the assumption shouldn't be that they just,
they just said what the guy said
that they actually maybe looked into it.
But that's corporate media.
They're, I wouldn't trust any of them.
But it says the IDF has now announced the
incident will be investigated.
Can you, I can only wonder
what their quote investigation will find.
It says the Hamas compound in Rafa is another example of
how they've intentionally weaponized.
Oh, what in what proof do we have of that?
Can you show me something that shows a compound in the
middle of the, all these tents that you bombed?
No, I'm sure they'll come up with something,
some fake video they put out later.
That's my personal opinion.
That's, I mean, it's the gist of it.
And you see express news saying you're disgusting lying.
POS the leaflets you dropped in Gaza, in Arabic, say,
and here's the point, and I I've confirmed this
as well from now on.
The humanitarian zone will extend from,
and it lists these blocks.
2, 3, 7. One is,
and this is exactly why he doesn't put the numbers on here,
you see, but that's why I'm trying
to show you this overlap right here.
So you can just see that they're, they're clearly trying
to pretend that the area that they're told,
telling you they bombed was just somehow not
where they told them to go.
All they're doing is hoping that the
average person can't listen.
Like they're just gonna pretend that if they're showing you
a leaflet, they're lying about it.
It must be made up by Hama Harris.
That's why I think this one's important.
'cause this is what they put out.
This is directly posted by the IDF where you can clearly see
2, 3, 7, 1.
This is terrorism guys.
I don't, and not even just terrorism.
You are playing games with their lives.
You're tricking them into places
where you then murder them and telling 'em it's everyone.
It's their fault. Here's a little video
about this I thought was important.
And it's just simply showing you the same thing.
The exact location Rafa they attacked
was meant to be a safe zone.
They dropped at eight one ton bombs on the area,
as it says bombed around these barracks are simply showing
and for the, uh, there's, it's in, uh, another language.
So just read the subtitles.
It's saying that was the area that was bombed
with more than eight missiles and the tens caught fire.
They claim a significance of this matter is
that the area is one of the safe zones.
The occupation army mentioned this last week,
inviting people to stay in or go to these areas.
Here you go. The area that was explosion occurred today,
2, 3, 7, 1 are among the safe zones
that the Israeli occupation mentioned as safe
for the people, therefore Palestinian
residents, some of them anyway.
And the Gaza Strip and Rafa can be in that area.
They told they would be safe.
However, today they were bombed with a series of missiles
that burned all or part of these tents in that area.
Now, here is in case you need to see it again, right?
Like the frustrating nature of how clear, excuse me,
the frustrating nature of how obvious this is.
You have Harts corporate media in Israel.
You've got the New York Times corporate media in the
United States and western world.
The most destructive bombs were used
by Israel in areas designated as safe.
And they're even talking about the southern areas.
I mean, in this very article,
they're talking about the areas generally speaking
that we just talked about.
2000 pound bombs, the dumb bombs on top of innocent people.
And this doesn't matter.
Human rights groups, they're murdering people.
It doesn't matter. Un they're
murdering people, it doesn't matter.
These are the governments with too much power
that have allowed this to continue.
Lowkey also highlights
that the British military is actively participating
in this ongoing genocide.
Merch Osint also points out the British Air Force.
Shadow R one spy plane was active over Gaza when Israel
conducted its strike
of innocent people in tents that were burned alive.
Good job, British government fight for freedom, right?
Well, it's not just the British government.
Here's the United States delivering more bombs
to Israel this morning amid massacre and Rafa.
Yeah, but we're gonna hold, let Brian Mass scream about
how they're gonna force Biden to ship the mouth.
They're not stopping anything.
You guys are all a bunch of children acting in theater.
That's what's actually going on in my opinion.
And well quite much, you know,
a little bit more dangerous than that, seeing as
how they have a lot of power, but the games they put
forward, I don't think these people
even truly are in control.
I think it's quite obvious that people like Brian Mass
and the rest of them are acting in
the interest of something else.
What's driving that you can decide for yourself.
Now here, lens Veritas points out,
while they're burning children alive,
Morich was having a rave, a po a big concert,
and they were dancing and having fun.
And he says with raging fire behind him,
literally on a screen, on a screen with fire burning
behind him while they're burning people alive says,
even in darkness, we must see the light.
He says, as Israel burns Gaza to the ground, he says,
these celebrations project a stain
for Palestinians sometimes involving burning Palestinian
flags and effigies.
But I find it hard to miss
that they're literally talking about burning
while they're burning down air.
Like I don't think it's an accident
that they burned these people in these tents.
Here's another example, and this is also yesterday,
Israelis celebrating, I guess what's called log bomar,
while sharing footage of displaced Palestinians
and Rafa being burnt alive, dancing, nothing new.
But let's realize that the, the fact that this was
so egregious and so many people, I,
I think this is more about the fact
that they've recognized whether
or not this event took place,
that they have lost control to such a degree.
Finally, maybe come to terms with that
Netanyahu acknowledges quote, tragic mistake
after Rafa strike kills dozens.
Or it's them to pretend, to pretend like they care.
Nothing's stopping. That's what really matters.
And what's embarrassing again is Israel's military said
earlier that it's gonna launch
an investigation into the deaths.
You know, the deaths of the people that they made sure
to kill the targeting civilians.
And they're gonna investigate whether they killed civilians
that make sense to anybody, particularly the United States.
They say criticism, really a bunch
of foe outrage is what I'm seeing.
It says Israel insists that adheres to international law.
You know, while it blatantly ignores the international law
that's being, you know, the ICJ and the ICC
and basically going, we don't care what you say,
but look, we're working with international law.
I mean, this is the same as the United States government
claiming we respect Iraq sovereignty.
And then when Iraq votes them to leave, they go, no .
But we respect your sovereignty.
So you don't though that's obvious and the same thing.
You're really not abiding by international law when you're
breaking it everywhere you look
and ignoring the international community
that says you're breaking the law, it's painful.
The problem is that powerful governments like the US are
allowing this to see itself through.
Maybe they're gonna pretend,
and I promise you this is gonna come,
that they were always fighting this and they finally,
but they let it finish.
That's what seems to be happening.
They just let this come to its fruition.
That's not okay with anybody. Tragic mistake. Yeah.
Uh, eight months of tragic s you don't whoopsy
and kill 50,000 people, okay?
This is not a mistake.
This is them trying to alleviate some level of pressure
and acting like they are accountable in some way.
And here's the best example.
Rami are, uh, a yari points out.
Eventually everyone will say they were
against the Gaza genocide.
Of course, that's what's going to happen.
You know, it even the enablers, the justifiers,
the fence sitters and the perpetuators themselves,
which I argue Pierce Morgan is a mix of all of those.
But here's what he says. And this is
what she's quoting these scenes from
Ralph overnight are horrific.
I've just, I've defended Israel's right to defend itself.
It's just such, such a game after October 7th.
But slaughtering so many innocent people
as they cower in refugee camp,
refugee camps is indefensible.
Oh, now it's indefensible, right?
200 in a, in jli refugee camp.
That was, that was okay, maybe.
Okay, one guy, no, now it's indefensible.
How does anybody take this person seriously?
Like I don't care if you're
grappling with your own understanding.
It has been self-evidence since the first week, just
because you had to get over all of your mind garbage,
the, whatever you wanna call it.
The idea that your brain was packed full with
so many nonsensical lies about easily verifiable facts.
It was clear. People like us were screaming.
We were posting it underneath what you said.
You saw it, you didn't care. And even now you're acting
like they have a right to defend themselves.
But guess what? That's also not true.
Everybody anywhere has a right to defend themselves.
But in this legal dynamic,
anybody occupying an area does not have a right
to defend itself against the people they're murdering
as they occupy them.
Not even the concept of the, the belligerent occupier.
The idea, the idea is they're not protecting the people.
'cause this is a belligerent occupation.
They're not protecting the people.
They don't have a right if any of this stuff.
And guess what? That is what
the un expert on the topic has to say.
Here's what p or here's
what Pierce Morgan said first actually, which is ridiculous.
This is this back and forth. So Pierce Morgan says this,
and this is why as people have always pointed out,
whether it's ideology
or anything else, appeasing doesn't work
because what you do is you get attacked even more
for not going hard enough.
So he comes out and he walks this ridiculous line right now
will, they've gotta themselves, but is bad over here too?
No, we're talking about genocide pierce.
It's not really a one double-sided thing.
It's genocide, okay?
It was never, okay, not from the beginning, not
for 75 years, but now he goes, stop this
and you know what's gonna happen?
He's gonna get attacked from everybody.
We're gonna go, you're a weak feckless coward
for allowing it for eight months.
Then you're gonna get Netanyahu
and the rest of 'em going, you're attacking
Jews, you out antisemite.
Which is exactly what happens.
Fence sitters are some of the worst,
in my opinion, half the time.
But here's what Rabbi Shmuley said, this complete lunatic
who has completely lost the support
of even his own community because he's a complete lunatic.
He says respectful, respectfully Pierce Morgan.
I love that respectfully. But you're a piece.
That's usually how that works. Pierce Morgan,
you keep telling us you've upheld Israel's right
to defend itself as if you're doing
US Jews some great favor.
Again, he's not talking about Jews. You absolute moron.
This is about racism. That's what he wants you to think.
As I've said, every time it's the only the Zionists
and racist who are making this about Judaism.
He's both. So my point is,
Pierce Morgan is highlighting Israel's acts or criminal,
or that Israel has a right to d defend itself.
He's not saying Jewish people have a right to d defend.
Every individual, whether they're Christian or Jew
or anything else, has a right
to not a country in the context of an occupied territory,
whether they're Jews or not.
But what he's doing here is shoehorning
that back into the conversation.
He goes, we don't need your permission to stay alive.
Nobody said that this guy is a complete, he's lost his mind.
I mean, I think he's probably having a really hard time
with this because he was made fun of,
but even by his own people.
And I'm talking both Israeli and the Jewish community,
because he, he made himself look like a fool,
especially pushing in things like when his
whole back and forth with Candace.
He completely imploded.
But he says, we don't need your
permission to stay alive anymore.
The British needed our ours
to defend themselves against Hitler.
You're sanctimonious and self-righteous.
Say, you get where this is going. That's what he got.
And you know what? He deserves it
because he's walking the fence and
he is acting like he cares about.
And the point is, you can be balanced.
And I don't mean in like a ridiculous arbitrary sense
where you like one side for them, one side for them.
You can have a general opinion
where there's both sides deserve criticism.
That is applicable in some cases.
My point in this context is that this is not up for debate.
This is a simp.
I mean, and this is a great,
this is exactly why Zachary Foster said this.
He says, and this is today, you expelled them in 1948.
You massacred them in 1956.
You expelled them again in 1967 to 71.
You occupied them in 1967. You tortured them in 88 to 90.
You imposed checkpoints in 1991 and lockdowns in 94 to 98
and 2000 to 2005, a siege in 2007
and a mass slaughter in 2008, 2009, 2014,
and a genocide from 2023 to current.
He goes, a brief history of Israel's relationship
to Gaza in less than 200 characters.
See, not so complicated after all, that's the point.
It hasn't been complicated. It's obvious.
And if you're unable as a suppose a journalist to see
through the international law
that has constantly been violated from the very beginning,
then you don't, you're not a real person.
You're not a serious person in this conversation.
That's what I believe. So in response to that,
here's what somebody highlights the truth according
to the UN expert that he's ignoring.
Apparently Israel does not have the right
to self-defense on land that it occupies.
And remember, this is Francesca Albanese, who I,
I I really do greatly respect.
Like there's, there's a lot of this conversation or,
or you know, there's people that would argue
that we shouldn't in.
I mean, I, I'm not saying that we agree
with everything she ever said, and I don't think,
I don't think there's anybody out there that you can say
that about, quite frankly, especially from my perspective.
But that her stance on this topic alone has been consistent
and has been brave from the very beginning.
'cause realize she has been attacked
as an antisemite from the very beginning.
And as I keep saying in general,
for all those Republicans out there that attack any of them
as some kind of woke George Sorrows funded
or whatever, despite the overlap
to some degree, that's there.
Can't you see how you were called anti-Semites 30 seconds
ago for fighting for what you believe was a stolen election?
I mean, you can't, which by the way,
was clearly manipulated from all sides.
And I've always said that with the idea
that you were called Nazis for your trucker convoy,
like just realize how manipulative all of this is.
And now suddenly you're doing the same thing, not,
not even the majority, but you guys see it as well.
I think, well, here is
what the expert on the topic had to say.
- Your permission. I will clarify
what is self-defense under international law
and so that everyone can understand while there is not such
a thing, uh, that Israel could claim.
So, um, in common language,
self-defense might be understood
as the right to protect oneself.
But however, article 51 of the UN charter
that Israel has invoked, uh, is,
is not just the right to protect itself.
It's, it's a very, it's a self-defense
under international law.
It's a legal term of art and means the right to wage a war.
- And also think about how dumb it is
that they're literally calling the UN Hamas
and saying that UN is a dumb
group and we shouldn't be a part of it.
It doesn't matter. It doesn't exist.
They're not legitimate and then going,
but here's the charter that we're using to justify our acts.
just that's worthy of ridicule,
- Which Israel doesn't have.
And this is consolidated jurisprudence of it's a
self-defense under international law.
It's a legal term of art
and means the right to wage a war which Israel doesn't have.
And this is consolidated jurisprudence
of the supreme judicial organ of the United Nations.
Uh, um,
and, uh, I understand that practice, ma,
the state practice might diverge United States and Iraq,
but the law remains the law
and this is what we should follow.
So, um, the right of self-defense can be invoked when,
uh, when a state is threatened, um, uh,
by another state, which is not the case.
Israel has not claimed that
that has been threatened by another state.
Uh, it's it's been threatened by, um,
by an armed group qualified the way you want,
but it's an armed group within occupied territory.
And frankly, even saying the war between Gaza
and Israel is wrong because Gaza is not a standalone entity.
It's part of the occupied territory.
But so in particular, the Israel cannot claim the right
of self-defense, uh, against a threat
that emanate from the territory it occupies, uh,
from a territory that is kept under belligerent occupation.
And this is not only this exists in the jurisprudence
of the ICJ, uh, in general, it's also being said in the case
of occupied Palestinian territory.
- Very, very clear. There's not even
an argument to try to say that.
I mean, they, they, they just,
well un some moss is about the level
of the argument you get today.
It's easy to back this stuff up, guys.
It's not hard to see or the,
this is why they attack the foundational concepts like
occupation, like the idea of the right of return.
They attack these to try
to undermine the core point they know will be made that yes,
your occupying as all of the law
around the world makes clear that everybody,
even your allies have quietly
acknowledged because it's the case.
So that means therefore one, yes,
an armed group has the right of armed resistance,
meaning violence to fight back against this occupier legally
under the Fortune Neeva Convention.
And yes, that means that Israel
as the occupier does not have the right to attack them
as under some guise of self-defense.
It's just simply not the reality.
You can argue that what are they
supposed to stand back and do nothing.
Well, technically speaking,
what they should do is stop breaking the law
by illegally occupying territory until that goes away.
Yes, they're in the de detriment here
because they are the occupier.
It's very simple, very simple.
Now, at end of the day, the point should be to go back to
what has already been agreed
to the same thing from 67 forward, that Israel has never
to this day a, a, a allowed to take place.
Now we know looking forward or looking back
and forward, that we can see that they never wanted that
to be the case that they funded Hamas
to make sure they were divided so they could point to that
and say, see, they're terrorists knowing
that they secretly didn't ever want the two state solution.
That's what this was always about.
And that's all public information at this point.
That's come out in a thousand different ways.
And yet you still have your ridiculous governments out there
pretending like it's not happening.
And the people like the mass of the world
and the cottons of the world screaming falsehood
that Hamas is this, and they work for Hamas.
And now suddenly the ICJ is part of Hamas
that's actually being said.
Mike Pompeo literally said,
these groups are working for Hamas.
Think about how childishly stupid that is.
You can say that what they're doing benefits Hamas,
but to just go as far as to say they now are Hamas like,
we need to ridicule these people.
And I think the reason it's gotten this stupid is
because they know they're losing.
I mean, and, and here's the rationalization
coming from the usual suspects.
So as you now have even Netanyahu saying, yes,
it was a mistake, here are the people
that just do the same anyway, Jeffrey Mead says,
why were two senior Hamas leaders
hiding in the middle of a civilian camp?
Oh, oh, Jeffrey, did you, did you see them?
Did you meet them? Did you see pictures?
Did you get some kind of evidence?
The rest of the world didn't get?
No, you're just blindly picking aside Israel said,
therefore, that's the truth, right?
But if you were to go, well,
Hamas said they'd say, you're so stupid.
Well, either side blindly taking the face
value would be that stupid.
So let's acknowledge that.
If you're blindly taking what any side says without your own
due diligence, you are being a child.
Of course, Hamas could lie, of course Gaza could lie.
Of course, individual Palestinians could lie.
Of course, the same thing applies on either side,
whether a civilian, a Hamas member, a Israeli citizen,
a Jewish person, the point is anybody could make
things up for their own interest.
So now if we're sitting at a point where
what we have in front of us is video upon video
of evidence from human rights groups,
from people on the ground, from other governments
highlighting that they bombed a bunch of tents,
then people got burned alive.
And you yet have yet to see anything
that proves Hamos leaders were there, the right responses,
civilians were killed, which is a huge deal
even if they were there.
And that we need demand evidence of their let presence
to even get past the
argument that they were there in the first place.
And even from there realize
that it's still collective punishment.
But see, none of this factors into people
that are blindly choosing one narrative
and even then realizing
that the narrative he thinks he's picking still proves
that they're breaking the law.
So Jeffrey Mead is a genocide supporter.
I mean, you're literally on the record,
openly aligning yourself
with clear violations of international law.
But then if you're asking why were they there,
and let's just, let's just say hypothetically
there were Hamas members there.
Now were they using people as human shields?
Were they tied to their legs?
Or were these people that you call Hamas
that were just simply present?
Or let's even say that they were Hamas members
who were there within a civilian
because they were sitting there with their families.
Is that a legal target then
because you claim their Hamas, which is a group
that you're claiming as a terrorist group
that Israel funded into existence and made, I mean, come on.
You just can't keep making these flimsy arguments.
But this is the best that they have.
Here is a literal representative of the US government,
sep state representative, Randy fine,
yet again outdoing himself.
He says, the Hama leadership hid among quote civilians.
I mean, you couldn't even, you couldn't just
say that hid among civilians.
That's all you needed to do, buddy.
To just put it in quotes, you're making it very clear
that you are a maniac.
So to him, there are no civilians. Why?
Because they were hiding among them.
So therefore, now they're complicit
because this guy hid among them, which is your statement.
In order to try to get a free pass, this is a war.
What happened to like, okay, let's put it this way.
Let's just say you're dealing with an enemy combatant,
and you find this person sitting there with no gun.
Are you supposed to shoot 'em in the head?
These people go, yeah, Kamas killed it all.
Well, guess what? That's a crime.
You're supposed to not murder people that aren't armed,
whether they're the enemy or not.
But see, today, especially from the Republican side
of this conversation, that seems to be like actively trying
to deteriorate things that are at least international norms
that most of them don't even abide by anyway.
Abide by. You're trying to create the idea that somehow,
well, if we say you're bad enough, though, none of
that matters anymore because
we're freedom and you're bad guy.
I mean, you might as well go back to kindergarten.
It's the most bottom of the barrel logic.
So what we're talking about is if you have people
that were there, are, are we just foregoing the the idea
that they're supposed to be engaged in combat
or are you just gonna murder them with their families
and say, well they, is that what Trump said?
We'll kill them and their families. Yes.
Because you see where this is going their right.
No matter what might makes right, we decide
who is the bad guy and who's not.
And guess what? America, you guys are next
pointing at myself, ,
they saying we are now the enemies.
He says, that's a war crime.
So it's a war crime to hide amongst people.
It's not really, it's not at all technically,
unless you're arguably using them physically as shields,
which you can't prove they're doing.
Sitting with their family in a tent is not a crime.
But sure as hell bombing them.
And I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm saying using
his argument, bombing them
and killing civilians is sure as hell a war crime.
He says Israel bombed them. That is not bombs away.
I just, these is terrifying.
These are powerful people
and he's a Jewish and proud Zionist.
This is our point, guys. That has to matter right now.
Not the Jewish part, the Zionist part.
He is literally telling you that he's actively of a mind
that Zionism, I mean this is his guiding practice at this
point, and that's very clear, which means he's acting in the
interest of something other than what Americans want
or the law for that matter.
Here is the point we made earlier.
This is a former head of Israeli Mossad
who sang on the record, everyone over the age
of four is a target.
Oh, that's right. I'm just gonna play it right here.
So it's, it's an he speaking in Hebrew.
So here's what it says, a word
in in the favor of the guy.
He is talking about the word in your favor.
He says maybe a little different from what you said.
He says, there are no uninvolved civilians in Gaza.
We keep hearing this. So you can't keep pretending like
you're trying to only go after Hamas,
but then everyone in your, your organization continues
to say that there is nobody innocent.
And I'm, I'm not talking just random people
or former everythings, I'm talking about people
that are currently leading positions in the Israeli Knesset
in their government right now
who have said no one there is innocent,
the children are guilty.
These are direct statements from their leadership.
And here he is, former head from
of Israeli Mossad telling you that
he says there's no such thing as innocent civilians.
He goes, look, you're right, you're right.
That's the person in interviewing him saying that,
which is also disgusting.
That's the, the common Zionist idea
that nobody there is innocent
because apparently they all voted them in in
2006, even though they all didn't.
It was 46% was not a majority.
And even then, how are you
pretending these children did that?
Everyone voted for Hamas.
Everyone over the age of four is a Hamas supporter.
So you're telling me that five-year-olds voted at that time.
What kind of lunacy is this? On top of that?
Ask yourself how we've yet to absorb the part
of the conversation that Israel made this happen.
I am still convinced there's no way they would've allowed a
legitimate election with a group
that they were at the time calling terrorists.
How in the world are we
supposed to pretend that makes sense?
And then at that time, we also know that they funded amass
with a bill $1.4 billion to keep them in power.
But then they just let an election decide,
come on, we can't be this naive.
- So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
- Yeah, sure. He deliberately
and systematically even, even told is on record.
Whoever wants to avoid the threat
of a two state solution has to support my policy
of paying protection money to the Hamas.
- So what we did, uh, with the permission
of our Prime Minister is to let
Qatar, to transfer a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than
$1.4 billion by doing it.
We increase the power of Hamas.
We did everything in order to make sure
that Hamas will go on controlling Gaza
and Palestinian authority will control the West Bank,
so they will fight each other.
- Pretty damn clear. Former head of Shin bet,
former prime minister, not hard to see
here he is again saying anyone over the age
of four is a Hamas supporter.
You, you know, you know Dan well,
this guy knows exactly what they just said.
He says, end, our goal at the moment is to continuation of
what you said is to turn them from Hamas supporters
into Hamas dislikes by bombing them to death
and the way is to supplying humanitarian aid through us.
But they're not doing that, right?
So either way, what he is telling you is
that anyone under four, now let's just even say he doesn't
feel they should be killed.
What you're hearing is the reality that they view them all
as supporters of Hamas.
She goes regarding the uninvolved,
every house in Gaza has a Hamas headquarters has weapons.
She just said every house in Gaza.
I mean, this is like watching Fox News and CNN guys.
This is, this is the equivalent of that in, in the,
in Israel as alla everything.
So now apparently there's weapons in Hamas, tunnels in Alla.
You know why? Because they wanted destroy that
to put in the third, the, the, you know,
it's the whole prophecy of the third temple.
That's what we're talking about here.
This is mainstream media in Israel.
- The - All the signs are there
and still, how did you say children from the age of zero
to four, they are uninvolved.
Maybe when they grow up, they will be, see,
my my God, that's terrifying.
In the meantime, you cannot starve them.
He said they are children.
There's nothing you then he says there's shelter,
nothing you can do nothing to do.
And she goes, I agree with you.
This is also against our interests.
God, these people are horrifying.
I mean, and guys realize that's the moderate side of it.
Not just coming right out and saying murder them all.
They're guilty kind of waffling about it
and going, well, we'll have to wait until they're four.
At least that's what we're dealing with.
So people that allow the four year olds to survive
and the ones that wanna kill everybody,
that's the middle ground.
This is, this is kind of terrifying to realize
that this is the level we're at, that this is being allowed
by your representation wherever you are in the world,
other than a few select groups, Andrew Fox, middle East,
and Disin informant researcher,
but can't seem to wrap his mind around
how this is all lies says, if a military force hides
among civilians, then the death
of those civilians is on them.
No, that's just, this is just not, look,
you can clearly argue that they're responsible in some cases
for deaths that might have been like, let's put it this way.
If you, as the person bombing,
sees a guy standing in a crowd full of children
and then decides to drop a 2000 pound bomb on the house
they're in, that's your fault.
Now, if you go in there and try
to actively do the best you can to avoid those, which is
what Israel's pretending they're doing,
and in the context of that
or in the, in the process of that
somebody accidentally gets killed, that's,
you could make an argument.
And even then I would want it very clearly broken down.
The argument being that you did your best to avoid it
and they made that happen.
You see the big difference there, bombing
with 2000 pound bombs on top of people
and acting like anybody there was somehow responsible.
'cause Hamas is present, is crazy,
and anyone acting like that makes sense is lost,
is either lost their mind
or secretly thinks this is all okay.
And he just basically makes these arguments again, he goes,
think with your rational brain, not your emotional brain,
which yeah, the idea of course,
we shouldn't be emotionally reacting,
but to pretend like it's not emotional
to see children destroyed
because you are claiming it's justified.
Obviously something matters.
There he goes, the aim of an information campaign is
to generate an emotional reaction.
I agree with that people then,
but let's get to his actual point.
Okay? So there's no point .
I mean, my point was what he said up here,
because it's actually about the thread,
but I'm realize he is realizing always, he's just
bloviating about the idea that emotions will manipulate.
I agree with that. And we're not, this is a completely a,
an unemotional reaction to the facts.
Collective punishment's a crime. Human shields are a crime.
If you can't prove that, the idea being
that you're blindly taking at face value, what a government
that's been lying incessantly just told you,
that doesn't seem like a very good, decent information.
Debunker to me. He says,
thinking while psychologically stressed means
that your brain's response, yeah, we know all this.
We talked about all this emotions are used
by your governments to manipulate you.
Clearly it seems to be working against you,
whether handling information, misinformation,
misinformation, on and on and on.
It's why I don't academically study Afghanistan. Okay?
In regards to photos of injured children,
of course children are likely to be injured in any warfare.
Civilians, which again, I hate this
blithe now it's just war.
War is bad. That is a ridiculous statement in my opinion.
Obviously we all should.
If if we actually think war is bad,
then we wouldn't just blithely dismiss it as some kind
of casual side effect of war.
This is something we should care about.
Children should not be a byproduct of these wars.
Now, yes, it's obviously possible,
but that statement could be made about any dynamic
that people die in war,
not just focusing on, well, children die.
The belligerence, the disregard
for their life from the people
we're dealing with is the point.
It's not a casual byproduct.
They're the biggest aspect of what's happening here.
Women and children seem to be the focus of this war.
He says, same thing,
sub pictures present information equivalent of minefield,
but there's no, it, it,
yeah, you can read this for yourself.
None of this has to do with somehow breaking down the,
the proof or logic around this.
The idea is, or the assumption is that they're hiding
among civilians and therefore it's on them.
John highlights this
and says, why are tens of thousands
of Israelis cheering on the death of civilians
that you claim Israel's accidentally killing?
Good point, because they are
Israeli settlers are mocking the beheaded Palestinian babies
that we, that were seen in this picture.
That's what they're doing. And it happens every time he
says, because that is obviously a doll
and mockery is such a ass attempted fakery, my God.
So just let's all make a note of what this person really is.
Let's see, 66,000 followers. So look, is it possible?
Anything's possible, but
what evidence are we using to argue it's a doll?
Go ahead, let me know. Oh, so you're, you're blind opinion.
That's clearly adu. Are you kidding me?
In fact, we know for a fact that these are not fake.
What we can see out there has been independently verified
by many people on the ground who are filming these things,
who are watching the organic development of
where these things came from.
Now, even then, you could argue anything could be faked.
That's always an overlying reality.
Anything like wag the dog style,
the whole damn thing could be fake.
But if, if what we're left with is evidence
that clearly indicates that all of this just happened
where you're watching dead bodies get pulled out.
I mean, even go as far as to say, let's just say that was,
are you somehow pretending
that children didn't just get killed?
Right? It's just unreal.
The level of willful ignorance or complete prop.
Uh, what's the, you know, what's the best word for it?
You know, choosing to lie, to manipulate people, right?
It e either way, there's no way.
This is an honest engagement in my opinion.
And this person says breaking news, Matthew Fox
before any other serious journalist that the depa that,
that the decapitated child is in fact a doll.
I'm sure he'll spell out, spell it all out to us soon,
how he made this deduction that no one else has been able
to make so conclusively yet.
Here's what he says. Decapitated extremities bleed.
The odds of being decapitated in an airstrike
with no other injuries to the body are non-existent.
No other injuries to the body. The thing is in tatters.
And you're gonna, you're gonna tell me that an explosion at
that high temperatures wouldn't just evaporate or burn.
I mean, my God, this person simply says, you're a sick,
sick person showing you a child
that got burned all over his body in this last bombing.
He's actually was at the un displaced camp
that was bombed in Rafa.
And this person says, I wonder what fox got up to
during his time in the military seems
to be taking pleasure in this massacre.
Now, these are all personal opinions.
I just am utterly shocked that somebody would try to pretend
or even especially put themselves forward as some sort of,
some sort of disinformation researcher,
and then just blindly assume into the wind
or in the direction of what is interest of Israel.
And then after all of that censored news, well, well,
well highlights another example of a human shield.
I mean, guys, this is it, as I remember the,
at least the fifth of just since October 7th forward,
where we have caught Israel using human shields.
I mean, the most brazen examples,
a guy sitting in the middle of the street
with a blindfold on as they shoot over his head.
I bet you some of they're even here.
How much you wanna bet somebody?
Probably posted some of the older ones.
I I didn't look earlier. I have my video, I'll play again
because to make sure it's important
that people don't miss that.
Oh, here's this is, I haven't seen this one.
Yeah, I'm not seeing 'em. I don't wanna take too much time.
But you guys remember, we've gone, we've covered all
of them on the show and we just saw a recent one again,
and that was even covered by,
I think it was human rights watch,
or was it a mainstream, uh, higher human rights group
where the guy was being led along
with a blindfold into the areas and then he got free
and told, told everybody about it.
And so you have the video of them doing it
with guns over his head and then he came out
and testified to it.
So here's what we're seeing.
Israeli soldiers use elderly Palestinians
as a human shield in Rafa.
You can hear the shooting look,
they're directing to each other.
This guy's just standing there with them.
They're filming it all. It's unreal.
And just in case you forgot, we've covered this before.
This is an entire show on a huge segment about this,
the open secret of Israel using human shields.
Here's a major image that if you haven't seen,
is a very famous example.
The kid is literally tied to the front
of their jeep as they engage.
This clip is important. I know you've seen it a bunch,
but for those that are new, I want,
sorry about that.
I don't know what just happened, just, you know,
just another day in the life of TA gimme a second
whole thing just crashed on me.
Okay,
well, lemme play that clip then, since that's where we were.
Let me get my bearings again. I just lost
all my stuff that I had brought up.
Make sure you lemme know, you can still hear me.
Lemme make sure you guys can still hear me
and that everything, audio, whatever else,
I'm gonna play this clip, but respond in the chat.
Let me know if you can hear me talking right now.
Here is the clip I was gonna play about human shields.
2013 Palestinian children tortured, used
as shields by Israel per the United Nations Reuters,
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9-year-old
as human shields, avoid jail defense
for children international
and international human rights group.
Israel forces used five
Palestinian children as human shields.
That's 2023. This is from 2017.
Generally, human shields, since the beginning
of the occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank
and the gods of strip its human shields.
Israeli soldiers routinely used Palestinian civilians
as human shields by forcing them
to carry out life-threatening tasks.
It was also following a high court petition against this
practice, which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May, 2002,
that the IDF issued a general order prohibiting the use
of Palestinians as a means of human shield against gunfire
or attacks by the Palestinian side.
But then it goes on to say, following the order, the use
of human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms of the army did not construe
as a human shield the use of Palestinians provided.
They consented, the army continued the widespread use
of this practice, which they referred to
as the neighbor procedure.
Following another petition filed
by human rights organizations, the high court
of justice ruled that this practice two
violated international humanitarian law
and that this thus was illegal.
And guess what they've never stopped doing?
Here is the Institute for Middle East,
understanding the neighbor procedure.
Israel's use of Palestinian human shields from 2012,
human rights watch during military operations,
Israeli shoulders routinely coerced Palestinian civilians,
including children to perform life, endangering acts
that assisted military operations.
The practice known as the neighbor procedure. Now see this.
Now understand this is not some kind
of manipulative overlap, like where we're trying to
jam in something that doesn't apply.
This is legitimate human shield.
And if you watch the full in full show on that, which
that's just a clip of it's, uh, it's stated it,
here's the best, the most important part is Israel
acknowledged the practice.
I think I predict you said it in the clip
where they acknowledged that it was a problem.
Un said, that's human shields.
I mean, think about the fact that even on the record,
acknowledging, yeah, we've been doing that,
and then we're gonna stop.
And then they supposedly stopped.
That's when they went to the neighbor procedure,
which then again, as you heard in the clip,
then the UN came back and said, no, you're still doing it.
That is still human shields
and they've still done it since it is public policy.
And you, they keep getting caught on camera.
That's what we just showed you using human shields.
It's a very common practice. They do it all the time.
And so, so to understand what it means,
they're grabbing an innocent person many times, blindfolded,
and then just using them in front of them.
So if anybody shoots, they'll probably shoot them first.
That is the literal definition of human shields.
Not just saying that, oh, they've got them in this area.
Remember in the very beginning where they said simply
because Palestinians didn't wanna leave,
that they were all being used as human shields.
Well, by that logic, wait, there's a clip going
around right now showing you the, uh,
Mossad headquarters is right in the center of Tel Aviv.
And Herre wrote an article saying, doesn't
that mean they're using 'em all as human shields?
Well, yeah, if you're using that logic, it certainly does.
Of course, it only applies one way.
The point is simply that most of them didn't wanna leave
because they don't wanna be
displaced for the umpteenth time.
Human shield is when you're holding somebody against their
will in front of you, and then when you get,
and so the point is, when you're bombing all these people
and you only find dead Palestinians,
it's pretty clear what's going on, guys.
It really is overwhelming.
And here is one of the, this is something special,
something grotesque The Atlantic put out an article
trying to rationalize that killing children was legal.
Now look, anybody who's gonna be objective about this can
argue that there would be extreme circumstances like I just
described, where you have a murderer holding a child
and you're, you're doing literally everything in your power
short of getting killed yourself
to stop that child from dying.
But in the process that child dies anyway,
that would be ar See, I wouldn't even frame it as legal.
I would just be, I would argue that it was not a crime
or other crime was committed by the other side.
To simply argue that killing a child can be legally done is
so over the top to me and our now betrayed rights.
You should be absolutely terrified
by a society we're leading publications.
Start arguing that killing children is legal.
If anything, it is a code red alarm.
Here's the article itself.
It says, even when conducted legally war is ugly.
Oh, you're so brave. It is possible
to kill children legally.
They write if, for example, one is being attacked
by an enemy who hides behind them,
but even then that doesn't make it legal.
This is my point. So right there,
let's just say you dropped a grenade on both of them.
Oh, he got a child, here's a grenade. Yeah, it's his fault.
That's what's happening right now. Is that legal?
Are you allowed to do that? Of course not.
Show me the last time a bank robber was robbing a bank
and the cops blew up the building
and said, well, he had sausages.
That's, that's exactly what's happening.
But they say, but the site
of a legally killed child is no less
disturbing than the site of a murdered one.
Oh, again, you're just so brave.
Thank you for braving that free.
I mean, this is disgusting
, I just don't even know.
I mean, I don't know whether this person is coming from a
Zionist position or they actually believe this makes sense,
but these are the kind of things we need to make a note of.
Where, who's the editor that thought this was?
Okay, who's the writer that pretended this made sense?
Make a note of these people.
These are the worst people of society, the ones
that are gaslighting and literally obfuscating for genocide.
There is no legal killing of a child.
There is simply one in which the crime is allotted
to somebody on the other side.
Somebody is responsible, and the point
that you're arguing is legal to kill the child shows you
that you're rationalizing the killing of children.
Or the idea that by I just said,
because he's hiding behind you,
does not make it then okay to kill the child.
That's what that paragraph literally says,
or at the very least, seriously implies.
I don't think it's any, it couldn't be any more clear
when they are killing people in this refugee camp
because they claim that they were there.
There's some people there,
but they dropped 60 bombs over 48 hours, one ton
to two ton bombs in multiple
locations that were supposed to be safe.
There's just no rational.
Well, you say, oh, human shields,
even if they were using human shields,
what they did was irrational.
There's no way around it.
And we're watching a very alarming kind
of shuffling up of what people understand.
Again, it's a positive thing.
My point is that it's alarming to see
that this is what they really are.
PVT highlights a thread of Western Journal
as they write journal nazim providing cover
for the war crimes in Rafa today.
And this was on 26th even. This was yesterday.
The point is, this is what the BBC wrote,
deadly explosion reported in a refugee camp.
Really a deadly explosion, not a bomb.
Dozens killed and wounded after explosions in safe zone.
Even that's gonna anger Israel because oh, safe zone,
but they're, they're gaslighting the whole thing.
Explosions military proceeds into Rafa despite ICC
ruling .
How about their wildly breaking international law?
They're committing war crimes.
Israeli airstrike kills 35 Andra
after Hamas launches rockets.
Oh, so now it's tit fort. These rockets killed nobody.
There's not an, I mean the idea on top, I mean,
I haven't said it all in the beginning, it's infuriating.
It goes on from there. Israel strikes back at Hamas.
That is the way the New York post covered this.
Murdering an entire refugee camp full of innocent people,
burning them alive in their tents is striking back.
These people are horrible.
And you know, New York Post saying the same strikes back,
here's Fox News, Israeli,
our strike on Rafa kills two top ha Mosque commanders.
Oh, did they? Have you proved that Mr. Journalists?
Have you just blindly reported what Israel said?
They've lied about numerous examples, dozens of civilians
as a secondary comma, and you know, some civilians died.
Great job. Unbelievable.
And here's what you're getting from some
of these supposed representatives of Americans,
Senator James Ackford.
Now I say that in the first place
as representatives of Americans.
Not because he says he stands with Jewish people, but
because of the idea that he's actively in every sense,
acting in the interest of a foreign country
that is murdering innocent people,
whether or not they're Jewish.
The point though is he doesn't mean that,
and that's self-evident.
Oh, you stand with Jewish people, do you?
Well, I said, okay, what about these Jewish people?
What about this Holocaust survivor? Right?
What about this Jewish woman who's standing
with the purpose protest saying that I'm finally,
I mean, it's ridiculous.
Most of these groups, they're acting are pro Hamas.
Maniacs are put on by Jewish organizations,
but of course he doesn't mean them.
So I said, do you support these Jewish people?
Apparently you support Jewish people only
if they support Zionism.
So you support Zionism, not Jewish people.
That's kind of obvious to see.
And this person goes, Holocaust survivor.
Thank you for making my point.
Omar Badar writes, points out a interview done again by CNN,
which still kind of blows my mind of all the groups.
It seems that CNN has started
to at least do the least ridiculous coverage
of what's going on, yet still actively
gaslighting for genocide.
Just so we're clear about that. In no way do I think CNN
or Fox are any different.
I think these are all manipulated propaganda platforms
that are in varying degrees deciding whether they should
ignore or not align with Israel as they always have,
because they're losing everything for it.
That's gonna change as time goes forward.
You're gonna see them all, as we said earlier, as Romy said,
eventually start to act like we were
always going after them.
Just like with Covid, right? What are they all saying now?
All the, all the Weinsteins of the world.
Well, we were always ahead of everybody. We always saw it.
We were calling out. No, you didn't.
You all completely lied and word masks and everything else.
Now you pretend like you're leading the the charge.
That's how this game works.
People like us, we get censored and suppressed
and attacked until we're no longer there in hopes
that the memory of everything goes away as they jump in
and go, we are the ones that we're doing.
No, you weren't and you really weren't.
In fact, it's you guys out there more than anybody
that will never be highlighted
because you don't have a platform to shout from.
That's what happens, guys. It's not them doing any of this.
They're the ones that will stand on your shoulders
and pretend that they did everything you were doing
selflessly with no benefit.
Here is a Holocaust survivor who, according
to the guy we just showed you, is a in quote Holocaust
survivor because he doesn't say the right things.
He found human, he founded human rights watch,
he directed the A CLU at the, uh, directed the ACL U.
Now he's saying that Israel is engaging in a genocide.
So I wonder how that works out
for all these manipulators out there screaming
that it's all anti Jew hate and racism, anti-Semitism.
I wonder how Ben Shapiro's working this one out.
He must be a fake Jew as he called the rest of them
for doing the unjust thing of expressing their own opinion.
- Deni, he's a giant in the world of human rights
and a survivor of genocide himself.
He was born a Jew in Nazi Germany.
He and his parents escaped Berlin two weeks
before the start of World War ii.
He went on to study at Cornell
and then to co-found Human rights watch.
He was at the forefront of the movement
to establish the international tribunals,
which eventually became the ICC and the ICG.
- Isn't that interesting? Well,
before we go forward, here's human rights watch, right?
The group that he founded, it's very clearly telling you
that Israel is an apartheid state as of 2021.
So did Amus International, so did Beth Selem.
So did every leading human rights group in the world.
Apartheid being the most disgusting version of racism,
the worst version of racism in, in existence.
That's Zionism, that's apartheid, that's what this is.
- Also the former head of the A CLU
and the author of many books,
he wrote a powerful piece in the New York Review
of books this month on the situation in Gaza.
When you say in this New York Review of books piece
that you have concluded that Israel is guilty
of attempting genocide.
Yes. That's a very heavy charge. Yes.
- I was disturbed by some of the actions of Israel
by the use of very large weapons, uh,
2000 pound bombs,
which are utterly inappropriate in a crowded urban area.
A bomb like that can kill somebody two football fields away.
And using bombs like
that was inappropriate in the context of gossip. But still
- 200, I mean, think about what he just said, guys,
you realize they dropped these level
of bombs on the refugee camp yesterday,
and we're supposed to pretend that
that was going after two people.
I mean, see, this is what the legit,
the people in the US government,
the military, they know this.
You're telling me Matt Miller
and the rest of them from the Matt Miller,
from the previously from the depart, the the,
the Justice Depart or the D uh, was he DOJ
or State Department now I forget it was DOJ.
Any case, that's not a good example.
Then the point is, all of them know regardless, Matt Miller
and the rest of them who are screaming
that there's no violation or that what they did was, was,
was justifiable, are very aware the bombs they're using are
done in a way that's meant to broaden the scope,
not the opposite, yet they pretend it's not
the case because they're liars.
- I didn't think that Israel was engaged in genocide just
because of the effort to retaliate against Hamas,
even though I thought Israel went far overboard in the way
of its, uh, retaliation.
So what changed your mind then?
What changed my mind was that over a period of time, uh,
Israel has obstructed the delivery
of humanitarian assistance to, uh, Gaza.
And those who have been most severely victimized
are not the members of Hamas.
Men with guns ordinarily find a way to, uh, to get food
and to get fed, but it is young children
who are most severely damaged by malnutrition
and who will either starve to death
or if they survive, uh, they will be diminished, uh,
for the rest of their lives diminished.
- Here's a great point. So when we're being told
that the whole point is, well, Hamas knew
that Israel would react like this, so it's on them,
which again, is the most ridiculous argument.
That's so you knew we were genocidal, so it's your fault.
But think about this in reverse.
Let's just say that's an acceptable argument.
'cause we've heard that many times. Well, okay,
if your point is that you know,
that Hamas is gonna take the, that's the argument,
which is not even provably what's happening,
but that, you know, Hamas is gonna take the food.
So by not putting it in there
or by putting in in certain areas,
you guarantee that it won't make it to them.
So isn't that the same argument since you know they're bad,
that's your fault for not doing it the right way.
You see, that's the whole point is
that's not a valid argument.
That's the saying that it's your fault.
Stop hitting yourself like you're somehow,
or the idea, I mean, any way you play this,
you are responsible for your actions, right?
So by denying the food, it stops everybody from starving ilu
or stops everybody from being fed,
including your own hostages.
The idea that somehow that they knew they would do the,
it's your level
of response is completely within your own decision making process.
Had you decided to go to the UN and act
accordingly with the international community, I mean,
you'd never act to act for support again.
But instead, the Zionist organization went
to full genocide right away
and has shaken the world free of their lies,
- Finished physically and psychologically
by the severe malnutrition they had enduring as children.
And I thought that severe obstruction of the delivery
of humanitarian assistance amounted just in,
- Just for the clarification for those in the
chat, let's understand that.
Yet there, whether we're talking about a guided just attack
on this camp, it's already been admitted
that there were multiple 1000
or one ton bombs that were dropped, right?
Right. That's the level the, there,
there was indiscriminate bombing going on.
That's the real point.
And the idea of these ton forward bombs are meant to be less
and less discriminate, right?
That's the whole point. Just so we're clear on that,
'cause people in the chat are arguing
that missguided versus not.
I mean, at the end of the day, I,
I know they've admitted there's many
of it not being guided in this location,
but on top of all of it,
does that make that much of a difference?
We're talking about the, I mean, it makes it worse,
quite frankly, if we're targeting attacks towards
civilians, that's even worse.
But it's, it seems to have been both
by the reports we're getting from directly the
Israeli government conversation
- To genocide.
The amount of, uh, food and the amount of water
and the amount of fuel they have allowed in is
entirely inadequate to deal with the 2 million,
more than 2 million people who live in Gaza.
And, uh, the U-S-A-I-D administrator, Samantha Power
testified before Congress that famine had set in, in Gaza.
The head of the un, uh, world Food Program has said that,
uh, full blown famine, uh, is underway, uh, in Gaza,
um, destroying the farms,
destroying the greenhouses in Gaza, um,
killing a large number of aid workers
who were involved in the distribution of food, uh,
challenging the ability of the UN agency
that has been principally involved in distributing food
to continue that activity and persuading the United States
and other governments to cut off funds, uh,
from that agency.
All those things have had a cumulative impact on the
availability of food and water and electricity
and medical supplies.
Uh, in Gaza at this moment, uh, there are, uh,
settlers in the West Bank area
who are interrupting trucks, uh,
taking humanitarian assistance.
Mm-hmm, into, uh, to Gaza.
They are attacking the truck driver,
spilling the, uh, contents.
- Uh, I mean, ask yourself why it's so easy
for somebody like this, who in fact, by the way,
it's the hardest position in the world for
to be in his position and to point out the truth.
He's gonna be attacked by everybody.
He's gonna be attacked by the people who wanna hide
that from whatever side he's gonna be attacked
by the Zionist who wanna hide it
for clear, for obvious reasons.
He's gonna be attacked by the Jewish people
that believe he's challenging their faith by
that he's attacked because telling the truth,
that's why it's the most difficult position.
My point is, how is it so easy for him to sit there
and make this clear acknowledgement?
Yet your government can't do that, right?
Your very, your people out there
that are acting like they're fighting
for a rules-based international order
or fighting for international law, yet can't acknowledge
that this is actually happening.
That they're choosing to sabotage the food that comes in
with official support from Israel
by the IDF standing there guarding them as they do this,
that it's important to understand that,
that he's standing here telling you
what is easily verifiable as a Holocaust survivor,
as a Jewish person himself, as an Israeli himself.
Now, of course, you could argue he's lying.
Anybody could be lying, but what's the argument here?
Is he working for Hamas now?
Is he a trash Jew per Jewish person that,
that Ben Shapiro calls the, the Jewish Voices for Peace
because they call for ceasefire.
I mean, that's essentially the argument
that if you are a Jew that is standing on the wrong side,
you're not a Jewish person anymore.
What that shows you is they're fighting
for Zionism, nothing else. And this man has courage
- Carrying humanitarian aid.
The Israeli Milit defense forces
have not intervened in order
to prevent the settlers from engaging in sabotage of
that sort in delivering humanitarian assistance.
The, uh, internet,
the Israeli defense forces have aided the settlers
and a very large number of
Palestinians in the West Bank have been killed in the past
few months, uh, often
with the Israel defense forces either standing by
or directly participating in attacks on Palestinians,
uh, in that area.
- Prime Minister Netanya says
that this prosecutor is antisemitic
and it's feeding antisemitism,
- You know, the use of the, uh, term antisemitism, uh,
to attack those who criticize Israeli policies, uh,
degrades the, uh, the concept of antisemitism.
Antisemitism has been a great scorge, uh,
but it doesn't insulate the Israeli government from being
held to the same standards that other governments have
to be held to around the world.
- Can you imagine this interview on, in October,
or, you know, I mean, any month
before October last year, anytime, like,
can you imagine this ever being discussed like this?
It really does show you
how much has shifted in such a jarring way
that these CNN is.
I mean, they would've never allowed this conversation.
This guy would've never been allowed
to make these statements.
It's just, it's in, it's important
to understand how much has actually shifted.
- Uh, it is,
the Israeli government has been very comfortable
with certain antisemites.
Uh, prime Minister Netanyahu, for example,
has cultivated a relationship with Victor Orban,
the Prime Minister of Hungary.
Look at that, and I think it's appropriate
to consider Orban an anti-Semite. Now,
- Whether you think that or not, the point he's making is
that they use anti-Semitism to shut down criticism
of their government while complete seeming
to not even care about actual antisemitism in the world,
largely because the largest example
of antisemitism in the world is Zionism.
Now, that may be confusing for people that have yet
to understand what they really stand for
and what they publicly have said in the past,
or working alongside the Nazi organization
through the final solution, while pretending today that
that's what they were built upon.
It's, we've been lied to.
It is not hard to recognize,
and it may be shocking for you to hear,
but that you could look this stuff up on Wikipedia
for crying out loud, not because Wikipedia means it's true,
but it shows mass adoption of an understanding.
And what we know as Dan Cohen
and plenty of others have shown you that the Lee,
the Lee Lehe party clearly aligned itself with Nazi Germany.
That that just doesn't make any sense
or why the Israeli government funds the largest n neo-Nazi
group in the world right now with the Avv movement,
because they're not what they pretend to be.
That's, I'm not talking about Jews alone or Israelis alone.
I'm talking about the Zionist organization
and those that support it,
whatever they are, wherever they are.
- Uh, but, um, to charge the international criminal court
with antisemitism is, I think, absurd
- For you as somebody, a Jew who escaped Nazi Germany.
Yes, this must be, it's a weighty charge to, to,
to accuse Israel of genocide.
- It, it's a terrible thing to accuse anyone,
uh, of genocide.
- Let me ask you something. What with what's
with this context is somehow
because of the history, it's more of a, it's a bigger deal
to accuse them of genocide.
That doesn't even make sense. Are they committing it or not?
The law is static. It doesn't matter whether
or not some historical conversation changes
what you think about what they claim they are like, you have
to realize, well, he is talking, he's saying
because of the holocaust, that means that you're, this is
what Netanyahu even said,
that you're not allowed to do this to them.
It doesn't matter whether or not the history is there.
It matters that they're committing a genocide.
And yes, that's why the honest
and people with integrity, the people with bravery,
with courage like him, are standing up
and saying, that's again, that's it.
Right? There never again means never again,
no matter what we're talking about.
Not just the ridiculous, um,
un representative from Israel standing up
and saying never again means going after it.
Semis like you guys are, you have lost the plot,
- Right?
But it's a more terrible thing than
genocide should take place.
- A Jew who escaped Nazi Germany, yes, this must be,
it's a weighty charge How to, to,
to accuse Israel of genocide.
- It, it's a terrible thing to accuse anyone, uh,
of genocide, but it's a more terrible thing.
But genocide should take place, right?
In my view, Jews are only going to be safe, uh,
if everyone's rights are respected
and the rights of Jews are respected along with the rights
of everyone else, right?
- Exactly. Not some one minded focus on only this
or only the Jewish state for the Jewish people alone,
which by the way is racism.
Period. Bigotry rather. That's what we're talking about.
'cause it's not right. We're talking about a
religion, not an ethnicity.
So we're talking about bigotry.
But either way, the reality being
what he a Holocaust survivor, a you himself is highlighting,
is that what they're doing is creating antisemitism.
Now, if you wanna understand more about the point I made,
Zionism versus Nazim, you can watch this show for yourself.
It's important. It's all based on
facts all sourced down below.
You can look at for yourself.
Now, KUDs News Network highlights the BBC justifies Israeli
burning alive of Palestinians that are displaced, most
of whom are women and children in an attack
with eight bombs on an unre displacement camp
by saying Hamas launches rocket attack towards Tel Aviv.
That's how you cover this story.
Hours later, they killed a couple Palestinians.
That is the subline.
You're literally putting in the massacre
of people burned alive in their tents, women
and children as a secondary title
below Hamas launches rocket attack.
Think about how de dis abhorrent that is.
It's despicable and really hard to not outrage about this.
I mean, really, truly to just call.
I mean, I, it's, you know, it's frustrating.
I mean, this is the point. There's no removing your emotion
from this conversation,
but it's important to try your best to put that aside
and imply logic.
'cause emotions will circumvent your logic.
I've said that every single
time we've talked about anything.
But here's a great point that Sam Hussei makes.
This person is highlighting more than 230 days into the war.
Hamas is fired, a rocket barrage of Tel Aviv
for the first time in months.
Now, that's important. 'cause remember,
all these liars out there have been saying over the last
couple of weeks, for some clearly building for something,
they're firing rockets.
Even though there was no
sirens, there was no evidence of that.
They just said it online and people lied about it.
My point was, even they have admitted it was
exceedingly rare because they ran out.
Okay, that's a, that is a re a reality.
My argument is they were probably just holding onto a,
a certain reserve for certain circumstances
because they were pretty much out
or waiting for more to come from an ally who knows, which,
by the way, would be completely legal regardless of
what your para propaganda screaming tells you the point is,
and apparently from Rafa,
multiple impacts have been recorded in the area saying
they're, these have fired.
Now, even Robert has confirmed the location of this,
which was between IDF locations.
But this is says cheers from Palestinians at the site
of rockets being fired at Tel Aviv, which
of course they'll highlight is wanting to kill.
All the Jews know. They're talking about the fact
that they're resisting the co the ongoing genocide.
Imagine continuing to highlight a response
as you're screaming about your self-defense
as targeting people, as opposed to the reality
that you're responding in self-defense to ongoing genocide.
But the point, and also with
what we know are guided without guidance.
So you can't, you can argue that then means that war crime
because they don't know where it will land,
even though it's clear
that they never seem to have any effect.
But you can't then later claim they targeted
something, which they do every time.
But he says, Hamas officials says, the rockets
that were fired were fired from
between the presence of two IDF divisions.
Now, I'm not citing what Hamas said.
I'm citing what Roberts investigation said, speaking
with people on the ground
and others that have reported the same.
And the point being that you can even prove the location
they were in from where they claimed those.
The, there's a, a image they're showing of a couple
of white strings of law in the air, like the, you know, the,
uh, smoke and you can show the area they're talking about,
and you can show the area where the
IDF is in control of the air.
It's ridiculous. None of that then, even if they were there,
justifies the bombing of all these people
with no evidence of anything there.
And I wanna include
something we're gonna get to in a minute.
We've talked about this before. I think it was over here.
Oh no, it's, it's further down. We'll get to it.
The point is that I just talked about the idea of what this,
the history around, like the National Geographic discussed,
the rock, the, um, tunnels themselves
and how a lot of these locations
are there from a long time ago.
And on top of that, that the rockets even according
to the National Geographic, were being fired by merchants
who were working with Israel to smuggle things back
and forth to maintain the closure, sort
of like funding Hamas in order
to justify keeping these things done
or stopping the, uh, the
two state solution or keeping them divided.
The point is that you can look back at the discussion
or realize that there was a level of,
of profiteering going on at the smallest level,
allowing this to stay closed, to justify the smuggling.
And then as it says, according to National Geographic,
they would just pop off a couple rockets to make sure
that they wouldn't, there's something going on there.
But here is what Sam Hussein, he says, he goes, incredible
when the ICJ gives the order,
and Israel violates those orders,
as he says, has happened before.
Hamas is effectively attempting
to work with international law.
'cause they strike Tel Aviv. It's his opinion.
Obviously you can't, we
don't know what they're actually thinking.
But he says, I documented,
he said he documented this in
January where he goes, look at this.
It looks like Hamas stopped firing at Tel Aviv right
after South Africa filed its application.
And don't forget, they've said more than once, including
with the current one, that they will adhere
to whatever the court decides
and even present themselves, of course,
that remember they freaked out
and that that was, it was clamp us.
I forget which one it was that pointed to it
and said, look, Hamas is saying they'll work with the court.
What does that tell you? Well, it tells me that out
of everybody in the situation, you're the most belligerent.
It's refusing to engage
with the process while even the one you're calling a
terrorist organization is going, yes, we'll adhere
to the international law's ruling .
That didn't work the way you thought it would.
But his point is that every time they seem
to at least engage from their, their position with,
if there's a dynamic going on that they argue will lead
to a ceasefire, or that the international court is about to,
that they stand back.
But when extremes that Israel's violating them,
they fire and make a point.
I find that interesting. Now, he could be wrong,
but I think he's got, I think he's onto something there.
Now what we're gonna see is that there are people even in
positions of power that are standing up
and calling this for what it is.
British member of Parliament, Claudia Webb says,
Israel is out of control.
Israel is deliberately killing Palestinians.
Israel does not want peace. They want Gaza.
Now, I have to say that is a little bit more specific than
most of these wishy-washy statements.
She's coming out and saying it like it is.
But even then, I just have a, i, I know I'm jaded.
I find it hard to believe these people don't just recognize
a benefit in saying the thing they know.
People think. That's just how I feel.
But I, of course, I always leave open the possibility
that maybe they are honest.
I just find that really hard to believe these days.
But as always, I keep note, I just, like with Trump, I,
I did not believe he was what they thought.
I think I'm right. I I think it's pretty clear right now,
but I still hold out the hope as I did then
that maybe they're right about him.
I want that to be the case, just like I hope she's honest.
But, you know, same point.
But she is standing up and saying
this, which is having an effect.
And I think that's positive. Here is Erdogan, who again,
you have made my points clear about him over the years,
more than once, interesting NATO ally that the,
but at the same time is kind
of always a walking his own path,
which I respect at, at the same time.
But I know the guy's in the middle for me.
There's a lot of things that worry me about this entity.
But either way, he's pretty hard on the case of Israel.
And he stood up and said Turkey will do everything in his
power to ensure that the Israeli Israelis are brought
to justice for the crimes they committed.
I only stopped there 'cause I'm not sure if
that's exact quote is what Adam said.
But either way, the point is that he's saying
that he will see this done.
And I, I think that's very clear. He is been saying this.
Merch cent also highlights that a ship, the Marion d Danika,
apparently was actually denied Spanish port last week
because it carries 27 tons of explosives for Israel.
Well, just in the case of Israel is 27
bombs on a refugee camp, right?
All pinpoint targeted for Hamas.
But the point is, has nearly made it way its way to Hoffa
and Israel with a false destination.
So the case, the point is, this is not just Yemen anymore.
You now have other ports going, nevermind,
we're not gonna let you come here
because you're helping Israel.
And even then they're trying to lie
to circumvent what's happening.
Doesn't that show you that they've lost guys?
They have lost. This is over.
I I I mean in the sense of the, the,
the perception the world has chosen its side
and it's only gonna slowly trickle over here right now,
unless something major happens that drives it back,
which it's always possible, but right now it's very clear.
And so that means that's again, why we need to see
that it's the worst of society
that is standing by this right now.
Now here's something I think is
very interesting on the other side of this.
Here are people that are supporting what's going on.
Now, here's Luke Rodowski interviewing RFK Jr,
with a special appearance from somebody.
I'll show you in a minute. Little,
little chaperone apparently.
But he's talking to him about this.
I wanna at least listen to some of this.
And you really won't be surprised by what RFK says.
I mean, I I can't believe
with the pushback from his own audience
that he's still standing to this.
Again, that either tells me like with Biden or Trump
or any of the rest of them, that there's either something
compromising that situation
or he's just believes that they're okay to do this.
That they, I mean, I don't understand
how any logical person, let alone somebody who has been
so outspoken about so many other crimes of the government,
can pretend that this is still acceptable.
That they are the most moral army in the world,
which is what he keeps saying.
Or the, i Now, I don't think in this clip necessarily,
but as of like a couple of days ago, he was quoted as saying
that they've taken more effort than any military in the
world to stave civilian lives.
Guys, that's fundamentally false.
That is a very self-evident lie
with the amount of children killed.
The timeframe that's happened in, I mean,
there's a million metrics that they've broken.
The amount of journalists killed,
the amount of doctors fought.
I mean, it's unreal. They clearly are not taking specialist
effort to not kill civilians.
But let's listen to what he has to say. I'll stop it.
A few times.
- Last 30 years, international aid agencies
have pumped $8,600 per capita
to every single person in, in the Palestinian authority,
including a lot of people who aren't really there.
'cause the Palestinian authority and, um,
and RA counts people who left long ago in.
- Okay, just first and foremost, what we're talking about
is a situation that is egregiously manipulated
by Israel verifiably.
So where half the time a lot of this doesn't even make it
to the Palestinian authority.
And then from there, the Palestinian Authority being a group
that Robert has covered over
and over is a ill is a group that is clearly in most cases,
working under the thumb of Israel
against the Palestinian people.
As the Palestinian people will tell you.
And that through both of those filters, we're pretending all
of that makes it to Palestinians.
It provably does not. But even then, let's say it all does.
Are we gonna pretend
that $8,000 per person is somehow representative
of not being occupied
or the, the not allowance to, I mean, the point is
that they've been refugees for 75 years
because they have not abided by what they were legally bound
to do, at least in 67 forward.
But realizing it's always been an illegal occupation.
So you, you're again,
he called them the most pampered people on Earth.
Really take that into stock with what we just saw, whether
or not they were being murdered.
You understand these are people that are living in locations
that they are controlled, they're not allowed to do,
they don't have self-determination.
Now, whether or not there are places within Gaza
that you argue are not as bad,
it's still a controlled open air prison.
Whether or not there are more affluent areas in there,
because remember there are groups in there that work
with the Israeli people, , there are mosques members
that have been funded by Israel.
There's a lot of overlap there that we love to conflate.
The point is that there are people
that have lived their whole lives in refugee camps
because they're waiting to go home.
They still have the keys to their homes
that other people live in.
This is what UN was truly about,
which I know he knows the right of return.
It's about. And so the idea that we're supposed to just get,
just to stop taking all the money from all these
camps, it's been so long.
So you're just, you're asking 'em just
to forego their rights.
Is that what you're actually saying?
Miss the person standing up
for rights in every other circumstance?
Or does he not know that? Which is even more shocking to me.
It's just a terrible way to start.
- Or did it continue to, so
- Would your position be not to send them any money?
And would you also not send any money to Israel then
as president of the United States? No.
- What I would do, what I think we should be doing is
diplomatic solutions.
But we should, you know, we need, I think we need
to do a marshal plan for Gaza
after the war. But I don't think,
- Oh, okay, so let's let 'em finish everything first.
Let's let 'em finish what they're doing
and then we'll figure it all out.
And the plan, which we'll get to today, is what,
for you guys to hand pick who rules over them Is
that democracy we're supposed to be, I mean,
you have to realize how bad that is.
That keeps getting spoken about Will,
we're gonna figure out a solution after the war.
What do you mean you will just
because you guys point to this group
and say they're terrorist and they voted for them,
their vote doesn't matter anymore.
Is that democracy you guys get to just omit what, who Well,
we don't like their opinions, so they can't really vote.
Next time we'll pick for them
'cause they can't do it for themselves.
Democracy. That's really what's top.
The idea that they're supposed to decide what's gonna happen
after the war is showing you what their real idea is.
This is a person who would call foul about many other
dynamics that went just like that.
Gee, I wonder what different here.
I wonder what entity is driving this differently. Think
- That war can end until Hama is eliminated.
I don't think you can be giving money to Hamas. Yeah,
- So to, so to - You mean like Israel did, right?
Are we gonna pretend that's not the case?
That Israel didn't fund them with $1.4 billion?
At least in the case we can prove
or that they sent Mossad to Qatar in 2020
to petition them to keep funding.
Hamas does not matter. Apparently not today.
- The United Nations top court actually just ordered Israel
to immediately halt its operations in Rafa.
Mm-Hmm. , the United States and the Biden
administration asked them not to do this
and Israel just did it anyway.
How would you handle the situation
as president of the United States?
I, you know, would you allow them to continue that?
Would you allow American service members to be there?
- American service members aren't. There is.
- Yeah, they are. You see my point?
This is, these are basic things guys.
He is clearly either tapped into some sit some flow
of information that is misleading him, like a partisan one.
That's probably what it is. If he, if it's honest at all,
sort of like there have been times throughout a lot
of this stuff where he gets led in a partisan direction
or he's choosing to ignore this and lie about it.
I've proven to you at least four different times
that there are American personnel.
I don't care, by the way, if we're talking about
Americans like Brian Mass, who you are working in the IDF,
which is really alarming.
And that would mean by the way that they're Americans also
that have citizenship in Israel or vice versa.
That's that overlap.
But there are also individual Americans that are not Israeli
that are doing so, I mean,
even in the uk it's a public conversation.
I'll play a clip for you in a minute.
On top of that, even Axios covered this four months ago
that there was a three star general on the ground.
So those are all boots on the ground guys.
There's no way around that.
Just because they always play this game
where they're advising, well first of all,
whether they're advising or not,
there are boots on the ground, they're there,
but then we can prove that we've shown you
American soldiers, that one very famous one
where he is mar wearing like seven different patches
for the third temple who's actively
deployed inside of Israel.
Right? And we've proven all of this.
There's been many examples
where they've admitted this and he just doesn't know that.
I mean, come on.
- Yes, they are. They're, they're actually, um,
on the on in the water.
They set up, up, well
- They're on the beach.
Oh, okay. So now we're gonna pretend that's the only example
and here's the, here's the chaperone.
But chime in. No, no, we're ta the pier is new.
They have been there from the beginning.
How am I the only one that knows
that this conversation anyway, I know you guys know
that plenty of other genuine independent media out there
really do know that because we're paying attention.
But let here the chaperones gonna chime in.
I'll make listen to what he has to say. Service
- Members aren't there, Israel?
- Yes they are. They're, they're actually, um, on the, on,
in the water they have here set up, up, well,
they're the beach and poured and now they're being attacked.
So as, as president of the United States,
how would you handle the offerer situation?
And would you put our American troops
there like they are currently? No,
- I would not send American troops to Israel. And I,
- Isn't it funny that he just was like, they're not there
and they're like, oh, but they are,
oh, okay, let's keep going.
Oh, so you're not gonna push back.
I thought you were pretty certain they weren't there
or any, it's, this is so crazy to me.
If you just said they're not there,
then why wouldn't you be like, ah, no, they're not there.
That's, I I know that. Or you had,
you're basically tacitly admitting that you didn't know
and you pushed in the narrative anyway
and they told you you're wrong and you're okay.
I guess I'm wrong. Small
point. But I think that's very clear.
- Would support Israel with, with arms
and weapons. I think that,
- Oh, okay.
So he keep funding them with missiles and, and arms
and weapons that are murdering children.
That's, that's, that's the right decision.
- The International Court
of Justice part of the United Nations.
The United Nations just has an ingrained
hostility to Israel. And,
- Okay, so now we know they're antisemites the entirety
of the United Nations, which is made up
of a multifaceted body of multiple countries,
including United States and Israel.
But we're gonna pretend that they just have a
hatred toward Israel.
Are you talking about the individual nation states
that make up the voting process?
Or are you talking about the body itself,
which in fact doesn't have an effect over the voting process
other than being part of the body.
And of course they could talk and and manipulate that way,
but the point being, the votes themselves come from the
independent nation states in the security council
and in the, uh, the general assembly.
So they're just racist apparently. Well, certainly possible.
But how in the world are we still having this discussion?
I mean, look, if you're gonna pretend
that they're have a hostel towards Israel,
which doesn't mean racist towards Jewish
people, why wouldn't they?
Are we not watching Israel carry out a genocide?
Have we not watched them for 75 years,
carry out egregious crimes against the Palestinians,
legally speaking, the one
who is currently continuing to occupy.
But even then, my point is that you can't, I I don't see any
of the overt demonstration
that they're hostile towards Israel.
I see the examples routinely of the UN trying
to hold them accountable in certain cases
and some cases doing the opposite.
And every time they try to hold them accountable,
they cry foul and say, you hate Israel.
You mean other than the many times that they've worked
for you and worked in your direction.
I just can't take these people seriously. United
- Nations has, you know, has issued I think
14 condemnations the last five or six years against Israel.
- Yeah. Because there could be crimes for crying out loud.
We're talking about groups that have been deemed an
apartheid state by all the leading human rights groups
and they condemn it, or they condemn the fact
that they murdered people like
we're doing, they're doing right now.
But again, realize that in just as many cases,
you can show the un working as an organ
to support their continuing occupation,
because that is how it's been abused.
I guess we just leave that part out, right?
- One against North Korea, none against, you know, any
of these other nations that are,
- This is that same game they always play.
Well look, they didn't call out these crimes.
This is what they keep doing. He's
reading right outta the Pauls.
The, the, the propaganda has borrowed book at this point.
You, you Americans didn't care about Iraq. Why do you care?
Well, yeah, we did. We were marching then too.
The game is to pretend like, well, if you didn't mind
that one, why do you mind this one?
But don't you realize what you're doing
is admitting his genocide?
You're just saying that. Why am I not allowed to commit it?
Obviously, because the,
the body did not condemn North Korea more than in Israel
does not prove Israel's not committing crimes.
These are really bad points.
And it makes me wonder how in the world somebody who can be
so on point when it comes
to medical freedom cannot see these.
And by the way, my opinion is that he does,
I really believe it's just my opinion.
I don't believe he's stupid enough
to not to make these arguments.
I believe he's being driven to look, I can also say maybe,
and I hope to God it's
because he's using this to get in the position
and he is gonna change everything.
I will forever ask
for his forgiveness if he goes past this point,
gets the election and turns around
and changes everything the way that, uh, we want him to.
The majority comes out
and says, I said those things just to get in the position
and now we're gonna call it Israel.
I will beg his forgiveness
and support him as long, you know, I say forever,
but now, you know, you question everything all
the time, even people you support.
But I don't think that will happen.
But like with Trump, I hope that they're right
- Or, um, you know, that are, that are actually committing
human rights abuses all the time.
- Implying that Israel's not
right North Korea actually doing it.
Are you really pretending Israel has not
committed human rights violations?
You know, the human rights groups
around the world would disagree with you.
- Israel's the only democracy in the east,
only place where everybody can vote with your Arabs or Jews.
- I mean, do I even need to comment about these things?
Democracy, everyone can vote.
These are fundamental lie you could prove these aren't true.
So it's for the Jewish, it's the Jew state
for the Jews alone, he says, but everyone's the same.
That's simply not true.
That's not true in proper Israel proper,
but it's most certainly not true in the occupied
territories, which all of it's occupied.
But we call that Gaza in the West Bank today.
It's provably not true.
Does he not know that or does not care?
- Equal rights. Arabs
and Israel can run for every political office.
There's 10 Arabs serving in the cant.
They're serving on every level of the judiciary.
- You can literally read this outta the talking points.
It's sim mo most of what he says is basically true in regard
to the ru but it's not the ask Gideon levy from Hartz,
an Israeli Jew himself who's spoken about this
for a really long time.
It's a very clear manipulation.
They don't have the same rights.
Yes, they can do this, but they're treated
very, very differently.
Even going even further to ask what Ethiopian Jews feel.
We've made this point recently, or,
or orthodox Jews that are anti-Zionists.
They are not just treated as second class citizens.
They're treated as nothing.
And they've spoken out about this.
Her has covered this many times.
Ethiopian Jews, see they're second class citizens.
So, but he knows better.
- They have freedom of speech, they have freedom of religion
after there's 27 Asians, the Mideast
and 26 of them have official
religions. But, but the question is,
- What would you - Do for Israel?
- Right? See, and I'm glad he cut in right there
because you're just letting him wa you're,
this was not even the question.
You're just rattling off the Israel talking points.
I just had to make fun though. I think it's hilarious
that I'm sure this is Tim Pool show.
That's probably why it all happened,
which still blows my mind why this is even the central
person in this field, .
But either way, it's just funny how, you know,
Luke is asking real questions.
I I think he's doing a good job.
I think he's asking real questions.
I think he's doing a great interview.
And then, you know, I just think it's funny that, you know,
Tim's back there chiming in as the chaperone.
I think it's just humorous to
me. But listen to what he says.
- 27 Asians the midea
and 26 of them have official religions. But the question
- Is, what would you do for - Israel? What
- Would you do?
Real never answered the question. Real quick, quick.
I wanna, I wanna pull this up. This
is important to what you're asking, Luke.
This is, uh, from, uh, usni.org.
US soldiers critically injured during Gaza P operation.
Two other service members heard.
These are non-combat related injuries.
But this is US service members. Uh, uh, they're armed.
Uh, Lloyd Austin said that they are allowed
to return fire. They're current.
- This is a scam rather specifically a sidestep.
Yes, this is true. And I,
and the, the idea that they're non-combat,
do you realize they've already proven
that they deployed all sorts of weaponry
that were clearly there.
It's not a non-combat situation, guys.
First of all, they're armed. So hardly non-combat
and the reality that they're allowed to fire back,
should they be fired on, you know, as well as anybody
that should they be needed, should they justify it?
They'll do whatever they want.
The reality is, that's not the old thing going on.
There are American troops in Gaza,
there are American troops in Israel,
there's an American general there.
How do they not know all of this? Or why are they hiding it
- Currently under fire from Hamas in Gaza?
And uh, so based on what Luke was asking, I asked, knowing
that these, that the US
is doing this, they're building a pier.
Uh, should you get elected, would you call these troops back
and cancel the construction of this pier?
- Uh, you know, well
- See all, you see what, what bothers me about
that is Luke was asking a great question right
there, very specific.
Would you do this? Would you fund Israel?
And what would you do? Of course he swings it around,
makes it his question and acts it in a very different way
that actually kind of obfuscates the main
directed point in my opinion.
- I would have to look at the, the whole peer project.
I've been ambivalent about that project from the beginning.
I'm not sure that it's necessary.
Um, and, but I, you know, I would have
to understand it better.
I, I read both the
literature propaganda coming out of Israel
and the propaganda coming from Hamas.
And it's unclear to
- Me, and he just, both sides of the argument, ,
I read CNN Fox News, so I make sure I get the full picture.
- me, how, you know, what the Israel says,
there's plenty of supplies going into Gaza,
that there is no shortage of supplies.
That the problem in Gaza is
that Hama is stealing the, the supplies.
- How can they be this uninformed or this dishonest?
How is this possible?
I mean, my God, he real, I mean, we go
through this every day with tooth and nail guys.
It's ridiculous. It's not up for debate.
The UI mean, is he ignoring what the UN says
or is he now in the mind that un is Hamas?
I'm not saying we blindly take what UN says either.
If you look at all the information you have all the human
rights groups, the United Nations,
anybody on the ground versus what Israel says,
and by the way, they've proven this.
You can see these settlers tearing down the food trucks.
You can see the Kga group dumping things on their side of it
and pretending that it's their fault.
They can't come get it as they
block them from coming to get it.
It's, this is day on, day after day.
You've got Israelis on their side
pointing it out and doing their own videos.
So what are you looking? You're gonna listen to
what the Israeli general says
and looking what the Israeli general says, the law says.
Is that what you're doing? That's infuriating.
- It's rather than distributing them.
- Well, the Pentagon is also reporting just two days ago
that, that the aid is actually not getting through
to the people of .
- Yeah, look at that. Some fi some logic breaking. That's
- What Israel has been saying, that they can't,
the problem is not Jesus, a lack of supplies.
The problem is that Ahma won't allow
- Any, that's not what Luke said, man.
And the Pentagon was not saying that. I hope he follows up,
- But he, to have access to the supplies.
That's the same reason that complaint, it's the same
- Reason Gaza hasn't had water, is because of Ahma. You
- Know, oh my God, I can't see.
This is, this is the worst of the worst in my opinion.
How are you just chiming the no water?
Why are you gonna go into the old lies about the fact
that they didn't, Hey, had all the water they could,
but Hamas wouldn't let it come through.
These are fundamental lies.
Robert has been breaking this down from day one.
And it's easy to prove.
People know this conversation, laugh about those comments,
not because you disagree, but because it's childishly wrong.
- Israel shut off the water and electricity. No,
- They, they, - I'm telling
you, I don't even know why Luke is.
I look, I, you know,
my opinion king. That's the water pipes.
- Some of the water pipes, - Correct. See, I knew it.
I hadn't even finish this. I watched part of it earlier.
I wanted to kind of have a, a
impromptu response to it because of this.
The idea that they took these water pipes is one
of the oldest lies.
And Robert proved this in an earlier conversation.
The reality was that these were other occupied territories
that they had settlements in that they abandoned
and they took those water pipes
and used them to make these missiles with.
And the point is that they were simply, in any case,
resisting an occupation,
which makes it a legal resistance anyway.
But the overall point is
that you can literally prove the control
of the water is from Israel.
Listen to, uh, Francesca Albanese,
and literally anybody was standing in the conversation other
than Israeli entities.
They're restricting the flow of goods
and water and food and everything.
And the idea that even the water that does come
through is 98% undrinkable.
Abby Martin has proved this for years.
But let's listen to Tim
Poole and his group. 'cause they know,
- But then Israel did shut off the water
and did shut off the electricity to, uh,
2 million people. Not just
- Combatants.
No, no, no. Israel, first of all,
- Yes they did.
- Israel only controls about 9% of the water.
- Oh - My god, water in most of the water about, uh,
81%
or 91% of the water
in Gaza comes from d from 60 cell plants,
desalinization plants.
Those plants are dependent on oil,
on fuel and bunker fuel.
And what Israel says is there is
- What Israel says, plenty
- Of that, of the, that fuel in Gaza.
But they're using it to,
- It's, I mean, see these, I mean,
how in the world do you go to the like,
I'm not saying I'm blindly, Hamas says that's ridiculous.
It's the same thing as saying, well, Israel told me.
You mean the group that's been caught lying about almost
every form of this conversation about where they bomb
and who they're bombing and how they're bombing
and what they're doing and what they're taking everything.
I'm not talking about my opinion. I'm talking about being
caught even by the corporate media.
And you're gonna go, oh yeah, they said enough fuel's there,
so they should be doing it themselves.
You mean the fact that they have restricted the things they
need to even work with those machines
or the things that they need to repair them,
or the fact that the fuel itself has been restricted
long before October 7th.
But you know, RFK said, or Israel said, so we must know
- Fire rockets into Israel rather than
to operate their diesel help
plans. And there's plenty of, of
- Course it is.
They're fing rockets into fields
and that's why they can't run this thing.
I mean, guys, you realize that, that the settlements
that they set up next to this area, which is
where they later took those things when they abandoned them,
had constant water.
And look at the, look at the West Bank conversations.
Many of these places are right next
to each other within the West Bank are different based on
whether they are Palestinian versus Israeli,
and they have constant flowing fresh water.
Whereas even in the West Bank, they're highly restricted
with little flowing water and in many of these locations,
and they're in the same location.
There's just no way around this.
I highly recommend you look at Robert's work both on TA
and anywhere else, because he
has been breaking this down forever.
But so too have a lot of people, anybody
with honesty has been telling you the reality of this.
And again, Abby Martin's work is a great place to start.
- I have evidence of that because Israel's been hit
by about 20,000 rockets since October 7th,
and they consume a tremendous amount of fuel.
So what Israel says is they got plenty of oil.
They're just not you.
They are starving their own people. And we see this,
- Oh wow, we just jumped there.
Now they're using that fuel,
they're starving their own people.
And we're gonna just narrow next talking point.
I mean, it, it's, it's, it's, it's very hard
for me to take this seriously.
And you guys don't have to trust me.
I hope you're not just blindly listening to what I say.
I hope you're looking into this for yourselves
and looking at other Israeli entities.
You can look up har articles
that challenge most of what they're saying.
But apparently we're all racist for highlighting
what even Israeli journalists are highlighting about
what governments are lying about in Israel.
- Now, this scapegoating all the time where Jews,
the only Jewish nation is being blamed.
- Oh, and now it's because they're Jews.
Well, nobody, but you just mentioned
that we're talking about the crimes of a government Israel
and what they're doing now.
It's, you know, because they themselves create the dynamic
as the Zionist entity that it's only for Jews alone,
even though you just said it was equal rights everywhere.
Now suddenly it's not. The point is that you,
that's the Zionist entity making that the point.
And so then if you simply point at them
and say, well, Israel's doing that.
I didn't make that the point they did.
And then all of a sudden I'm the one making it about Jews.
When that was the thing the Zionist
government made the reality.
Well, I'm still over here pointing to Israel
and always have been, you know,
how do you not see how engineered that is
- Or, or crimes that Hamas is committing if, you know,
if a, if a bank robbery robs a bank and the po
and grabs a hostage
and is firing over the hostages shoulder at, you know,
at the police and the police fire back
and hit the hostage, you don't blame the
- Yeah, yeah.
Well, and you're fake dynamic.
You're pretending Israel is
actively only aiming at the bad guy
and whoopsie hit the shoulder of the hostage.
No, no, no. We're talking about thousand pound bombs dropped
on refugee camps because they might be there.
I mean, again, he knows this.
Even Wolf Blitzer couldn't swallow the argument
that one senior commander was justifiable for 200
innocent people in GI refugee camp.
We just showed you the 9 7 2 Israeli outlet
who is telling you that the IDF members told them
that they're rationalizing 20 people if they
have a junior Hamas member.
And realized that the earlier articles they showed you
already proved to you that they themselves admitted
that a junior member could be somebody
that was simply in the phone conversation in a text group
with somebody they called Hamas member.
You know, see, these are verifiable realities
that even Israel's admitted.
And yet, I mean, how is it possible
that we sitting here on this show no more than RFK Jr.
It's either he's lying or he's that shockingly uninformed.
These people are running for president for crying out six.
I mean, ah, it's frustrating.
And guys, this is exactly why people doing what we're doing,
non-partisan objective way are getting attacked,
getting financially suppressed,
getting sued, getting shut down. That's what's happening.
- The police, you blame my mind,
- But at the same time, we don't blow times square if
there's a terrorist inside of Times Square.
So that's another kind of situation that
that would counter your situation.
But back to the question about Rafa,
but it depends on how many terrorists are trying
- To square.
Of course, you know, we
- See, I I again, somebody in the chat, I don't know
how Luke can sit there trying
to conduct a legitimate interview.
Whenever you think about him and having to deal with
that kind of nonsense around him
that, I mean, that's unbelievable.
He tried and he tried, he countered
with the logical alternative, which is the point
that's actually happening.
You don't just bomb an entire area full of people
because one guy was there or might be there
and they allow, well, that means depends on
how many, no, it doesn't.
You absolute more on it really doesn't,
it sucks collective punishment.
You, he, if you're gonna apply RFK Jr's point,
you can't pretend that if pretty people are there
that you can bomb the whole area.
The point is, you're supposed to be going as best you can
around them, not just bomb them
and go, oh, well they were there,
but yep, that's the, that's the sentiment right now.
Well, it depends on how many,
- And we went into Ramah when we went into Mosul,
we killed a lot more civilians than Israels.
- I can't believe this is an
argument they think is justifiable.
So what you committed genocide
to the Israel, the American government.
Well, we, I think we all generally know there was a lot
of crimes committed in these areas.
The point is now we're suddenly having the courage
to call them out for it.
So maybe we should go back and invest
Inate, the United States government.
The point is that you can't say
they killed a lot of people too.
That's why this one's, okay, how is
that even a valid argument?
And on top of that, what we're talk, we don't, I we,
if we're gonna make the point, you need to be able
to highlight whether or not you think
that they were bombing indiscriminately,
which quite frankly, I think we know they did.
Versus pinpoint examples of going after one guy
and shooting the other guy in accident,
which is his example.
It's not,
- Is here right now, there's a war going on in Yeomen
where our allies, where the United, Alabama, it's the Saudis
are our bombing civilian targets.
They've killed already 350,000 civilians, 10 times.
People only complain when Israel,
- Are you kidding me?
Are you actually pretending like we don't care about the,
what they've been doing to Yemen, but
because they're kidding civilians, killing civilians.
That that somehow makes what you're doing. Okay?
Clearly what you're supporting.
Okay, I mean, for crying out loud,
we have been screaming about Yemen for like,
this is so infuriating.
You know, the idea that the US government has been
bombing school buses full of children.
Remember how that got a lot of attention? Are you pretending
we didn't protest about that?
Or that Jim Carrey didn't make a cartoon
that caused a lot of attention?
It's of course a crime
and they're literally starving to death.
It's one of the best analog, uh, comparisons.
The US government and its allies,
which is really what's happening,
are starving people to death in Yemen.
They've been doing it for decades. And that's, now,
that's okay because Israel's doing it now.
So we should all shut up 'cause we're Jew,
we're 'cause we're, we're Jewish.
Is that really your argument?
The point is, as I've said many times, only racist
and Zionists are making this about Judaism.
If you're gonna pretend that
because we didn't care about Yemen, even though we all did,
or we didn't care about Iraq, even though we all did
that we don't, that we only reason we now care about this
genocide, which is what your point sort
of makes it is a genocide, that it's only
because they're Jewish, not because it's a genocide.
I just don't know who honestly out there
is making sense of these points.
- I completely agree. Civilians are killed. Well,
- They're working with Al qa.
Completely agree.
They're, they're working with Alqaeda in Yemen as well.
See, see, Luke trying to squeeze in some facts. Tim Pool.
I agree, I agree.
Kill 'em all because you know, there's a hostage.
It's just infuriating. I felt that was important.
Here's another example of continuing blind support
for something that you think like,
and this comes down to the Republican side of it,
blindly thinking they're fighting woke George SR'S funded
idea, whatever it is, despite the fact
that Palestinians are predominantly conservative
and we're mostly pushing back against the
Cvid 19 conversation.
But because somebody with pink hair says they're on the
right side, we suddenly think they're all woke mindless.
It's so easy to manipulate people
trapped in the two party illusion.
And this is a Hartz article saying Happy holidays,
right wing Israeli journalists celebrate the Rafa attack,
which is actually what was going on, likening it
to La bag mere bonfire.
And Glenn Greenwald says, what's sicker
and more sociopathic than mocking
and celebrating that dozens of civilians,
including children are being incinerated to death.
See the CBS video below. Oh shit, I forgot to grab that.
Let's watch that where he says,
uh, or any other videos before you, uh, of the camp,
before you repulsively tried to deny any of this.
Let's see what, let's see what I, I forgot to look at this.
Let's see what CBS is reporting
and we'll see if we think this jives with the facts
- Tonight.
Palestinian, say an Israeli air.
- Let's see,
- tonight, Palestinian medics say an Israeli
airstrike killed at least 22 people when it hit tents.
For those who've been displaced, CBS's, MTS Taip has more,
- It was supposed to be of refuge
for those fleeing Israel's offensive in Raha.
But the Israeli military struck the Aloma camp tonight.
And the scenes are horrific.
A man holding a headless child
with the death toll in the dozens,
the survivors will likely end up at the Nassar Hospital.
And con Eunice, one of the only health facilities
that slowly returned to service
after it was overrun
by the Israeli military back in February.
Now a team from Doctors Without Borders have gotten it back
up and running again.
- We need a ceasefire for this health
- To stop.
- For nearly eight months,
Israel has made Gaza's hospitals a key target in its
devastating military campaign, insisting it's
because Hamas fighters are embedded inside.
We went with the Israeli military
to Gaza's Maine Alfa Hospital back in November. But the
- Criticism is, is that the evidence
provided so far is underwhelming that it doesn't show
unequivocally that this was a Hamas command center.
- Well, it will take us time this just a second.
This was not just one Hamas headquarter.
This was at least
three headquarters working simultaneously in the city
and outside the city.
- Remember, this is the place that they've
yet to ever prove.
They showed you a waiting room
with some things on the table, right?
And guns were even caught by BBC that they placed
after the fact, or the, the boxes they brought in
with fake labels on them that said human air, like he said,
supplies and human and food aid like ridiculous.
None of which actually made it to people
because they were full of guns
and things they placed to make
it look like that's what happened.
They were caught by corporate media or the old game.
They played with the old, the the MRI machine.
The idea that they could pretend that those things would be
behind a machine that would be used.
It, everything about them were they were caught lying across
the board or even going
to the most ridiculous example saying a calendar was somehow
indicative of a plan,
even though it was just a normal calendar.
And anybody that spoke Arabic could see that going right
to the very recent example
where they lied about the translations
of the women they claim were taken.
They lie about everything.
- And - We're, this is a level
of detail which we're not seeing though if you do,
there's three separate command centers,
but we can't see any of that.
- This is not, it's not, uh,
something you can see right now, Jesus,
- The 36 medical facilities that the u forever
- For that matter, since it doesn't exist.
- When's humanitarian affairs office tracks in Gaza?
Only four have not been rated by the Israeli military
or damaged in strikes mother of five,
Samira Aladan has cancer.
She needs the rougher crossing with Egypt to open
to get the operation she so desperately needs.
I have anxiety from the war and I fear for my children.
She says I'm suffering so much
and President Biden has got Egypt to restart,
sending aid into Gaza via Israel's em, Shalom crossing Jica.
But the increasing violence in Rafa means it's unclear if
the aid has reached those.
- See? And, and that, and that's their watering
down the point desperately
- Need it.
- And that we can prove, which I'm sure they can too.
And that's just, that's their choice to kind
of play one side, not the other.
Right? They're, they know they're gonna get attacked
for making these points make, you know,
gently calling out their lies even though they could
go a lot farther than that.
But then going that it's unclear, even though we know
for sure that Koga didn't deliver it
or that they allow, you know, this game they play.
I just love making fun of the way they talk.
It's unclear today whether or not they'll be there.
Like that's the way they always talk.
But my, what's ridiculous is that we can prove that they,
by every corner of this conversation, other than Israel,
have made sure this didn't go through.
That's the reality. Now, here are some other examples.
And these, this is the side they're on, the people like RFKQ
and the rest of them are acting like this is justifiable.
Here is, uh, what was he, what was, um, lemme get it.
I forgot what his bio said again.
It says, oh, just, you know, so he just works
for Channel 10, channel one canes, you know, part
of the Knesset, all these different things.
He's showing you an official representative.
Here's what he said and then deleted it
because he's a coward.
Apparently he highlighted the burning of tents full
of innocent people, children
and women burning alive at night while they were burning
alive and said the main lighting this year in Rafa.
How do you pretend that that doesn't show
you exactly who they are?
You're making light of innocent people burning to death.
You know, even if you wanna pretend
that you think they're all terrorists,
you're still making light of people burning
to death in tents where they are sleeping.
And then even more you deleted it, which shows you,
at the very least, you know,
that we think you're disgusting.
Not necessarily that you know you're wrong,
but B points this out and thank you for her for doing this
because somebody who actually included the link,
which gave me the opportunity to actually be able
to track trick, you know, use the way back machine
to find it, which by the way is a whole process
that takes me forever sometimes to search
for the words translate into Hebrew, but yet I found it.
And here is the way back machine showing you that he said
that the main lighting this year
in Rafa, here's his account.
Here's the archive. Too bad for you. The Internet's forever.
Yeah. And he deleted it. It is gone.
And this time for sure not,
not just being hidden by Twitter.
Like it, maybe that last one was, I, I can't tell.
I'm not sure. But this one you could tell it was deleted.
Ah, come on. And you include it for yourself.
Now, just to show you a couple other examples,
here is another massacre.
This, this is today, this is
after the Roth of massacre,
a new Israeli massacre in the new sweat refugee camp
that's been bombed relentlessly over
and over so many times they've claimed the lives of several
children and innocent civilians here are the dead children.
They bombed after bombing and,
and burning children alive inside of the, the, the,
the refugee camp in Rafa.
Here's another example. This is from May 9th, right?
So this is not a new one.
The point is he retweeted this to make sure we saw this.
I I was on his feed today
and he said a recent Euro me human rights group
investigation have revealed that back on December 4th.
So it took them until the May 9th to be a rather, uh, i,
I forget if it's May 9th when he is concluded
or he just reposted on May 9th.
The point was, the investigation was about a December 4th
investigation where Israeli drones all the way back then
deliberately targeted 12 civilians
and injured three others in Gaza City.
The attacks targeted the entire family, including women
and children who have been displaced following Israeli
orders to evacuate.
They targeted all of them. And
among the victims were five women, four children, three men,
including elderly and young adults.
The attack hit a family that was evacuating.
And here's, here's the outcome. Jesus
Just dead bodies littering the streets.
And you, and you also realized that nobody's,
nobody's cleaning this up guys.
These dead bodies are left to rot there in the street
where dogs are eating them
and they're walking by them as they flee back
and forth as they're forced to to travel.
Imagine that on top
of the fact might be shot in the head as you walk by.
Here's another example. This one's in Janine West Bank.
Not just Gaza, Israeli forces not settlers.
Israeli forces have set fire and burnt a number of vehicles
after raiding Kahar ine village.
And Janine, is this still about Hamas?
This is life as a Palestinian.
Now here, this is Phyllis Benice, as he writes, as she,
I think it's, uh, the account Dior writes,
sending shockwaves to the US government support for Israel.
Here's what she has to say.
And again, this is, um, where was it again?
I, but she's of official representative.
I believe she was on the United Nations.
I forget it was, I'll look it up as I'm playing this.
I looked it up earlier.
- We're meeting today at a very strange moment of history
and we are commemorating, if you will,
a very contradictory reality. 1948.
- Yeah, just for the record. So she is a,
an American Jewish writer, political commentator,
and she focuses mainly on issues related
to Middle East and the United Nations.
Important to understand,
- Saw the birth of the Universal Declaration of Hu
and we are commemorating, if you will,
a very contradictory reality.
1948 saw the birth of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights and the birth
of the convention against genocide.
It could have set the stage for an era
of human rights in the post World War II era.
But 1948 was also the year that gave rise
to apartheid in South Africa and to the NPA in Palestine.
- And we must remember that Israel was involved,
if not responsible for apartheid in South Africa.
They worked alongside that group, worked on ethnic weapons
and all sorts of terrible things.
That's not up for debate guys.
So recognizing they're involved and were involved
before, beginning, before, during, and
after the Rwanda genocide, Bosnia
or other examples, we need
to start recognizing the similarities here
and realizing that that's, they were involved
with South Africa apartheid
and are apartheid themselves, not hard to piece together.
- And instead of an era of human rights,
we saw a continuation of the era of settler colonialism.
Knowing that settler colonialism, even though it was under
attack, it was being ended in so much of the world
through brave struggles across Africa, the Middle East,
Asia, Latin America in this case,
settler colonialism was not over.
And the NPA of 1948 transformed Palestine.
It pal it transformed Palestinian history
and it consolidated one
of the last colonial projects in the era of decolonization.
Both South African apartheid
and the NPA in Palestine were enabled by western colonial
and imperial interests.
- So what an important point she's making
that at the very moment they
pretended they were fighting it.
In fact, they were cementing it secretly
for a very long time.
Now, what you need to recognize is just like the way US
government plays against, uh, they, they, they know
that we want good.
So they pretend to be good. It's the same dynamic.
I genuinely believe most
of the world wanted this positive direction
and yet they pretended to go
for it while they were secretly making sure it never went
away for their own benefit.
And we have to recognize whether all the way back then,
that was the manipulation of Zionism over the US government
or maybe the other way around.
You can decide for yourself or some mix.
The point is that they actively ignored what they, I mean
that you could look at it one of two ways that they ignored
that people wanted this and did it for their own benefit
or they themselves were fighting for that.
So they did it also for their own benefit, but simply
because it was what they believed.
I quite frankly think it's probably some of both.
But really it's always opportunism. Profiteering.
It's what their in they can benefit from.
This is not unique to the US government,
the British government's the same way.
A lot of them are exactly the same way.
I think honestly Winston Churchill is a classically good
example of raging racism
and the way that they've used these manipulative tools
or coercion
or authoritarianism while pretending to be for freedom.
This is exactly what this country pretends to be,
rather the government.
I hate when I make that mistake pretends
to be today you are the country.
We are the country, the government
is something very different.
And that's not some kind of now point.
That's always the case. They're supposed
to be the representatives of what our collective will,
even though I know that's not the reality of how this works.
That's the story we tell ourselves.
And so if we're pretending that they're somehow the point is
that they are the a they are the problem.
Not the entire country.
This is not an indictment of
what the people collectively in this country are.
We can change this. Now there's a level of accountability
of course, for allowing this to become the way it is.
But there's also a lot of social engineering and propaganda
and long-term manipulation.
'cause again, we thought we were fighting
for something good at this point.
At least the people were convinced of that.
That's important to recognize.
And it's now finally coming out.
- South Africa and Namibia are now free
playing an extraordinary role in the world.
And now the United States, unlike the earliest stages
of the npa, but now for sure the US is the main enabler
of the current version of the npa, which is underway,
particularly what we see in the genocide in Gaza,
which is funded and armed
by the United States.
Arming genocide through its provision of military aid,
transfer of weapons, and the provision
of absolute impunity to
- Now the, the whole speech, I believe is down below.
The point is that it's just shocking
to see this finally being stated.
And she'll still be called an antisemite,
but it's just not having, it's the lie has not the same
power as it used to.
But I'll include this as well.
Israel was involved in the Rwanda genocide, all very,
very clearly sourced most of, most of which
to most two Harts Israeli articles,
Israel documents.
It's easy to look up for yourself.
Now, a a Beran writes
something interesting about international law.
That's what this segment is kind of focused on.
Secretary Blinken said, I am announcing, uh,
on May 23rd a new visa restriction policy
for those responsible for undermining democracy in Georgia,
the country, including a connection
with the Georgian dreams proposed
for an influence legislation.
Scott Ritter says, actually I'll just skip
that since it's kind of the same point.
So this is a great response. So if case you don't know what
that is, I'll let Arnd tran make this clear.
He goes, let me get this right.
So those that are supposedly undermining democracy in
Georgia in a country far from the United States
are elected officials who are voting
for a law in their own country, requesting foreign NGOs
to register themselves.
Hmm, okay. He goes a law that's virtually the same
as the US' own foreign agents re registration act, Farrah,
which is where we talk about apac.
So get the understand what he's saying.
And it's not hard to wrap your mind
around the US government is saying
that they're undermining democracy when
what we're talking about are elected officials voting
for a law that makes these NGOs
that are manipulating democracy have to register themselves
like New National Endowment for Democracy, usaid, you know,
they pretend humanitarian groups out there and that.
So the only thing that's undermining democracy is the fact
that the US government's not
in control of what they're doing.
Now, that's not democracy, is it? Okay.
So what they mean by democracy is their
control over whatever happens.
And the moment that these people start acting in their own
interests or you know, whether that's even the reality
of what's happening, that's the statement that needs
to be made, whether we're talk.
'cause you could argue that maybe other vying,
controlling powers, whatever else, which is always the case.
My point is that what we see
as the supposed democracy is really whatever they want.
And like we've said before about funding the worst elements
of the terrorism, they claimed they're fighting.
It's because the more moderate elements
of the areas they wanted to control were not willing to bow
to whatever they wanted.
And moderate meaning far less extreme.
Not the people that were beheading and killing
and doing not that, people
that were not necessarily in the same mindset
as the US government, but definitely wanted to have a pa,
a normal society, whatever you think that is
where they had rights and people got
what they, they lived comfortably.
You know, the same thing that was happening in Libya
before they destroyed it all, despite
what you may understand, had the highest quality
of life in all of Africa, had free college, free healthcare.
These are all real things.
And they destroyed it fighting for democracy.
And then they were selling open slaves.
That's the, that's the US version of democracy.
So in this case, they don't like this
because this hurts their interests.
So they go, you're undermining democracy.
They are a, a walking joke today.
I mean, I guess this is, I, I really hope I'm not misreading
how prevalent this understanding is,
because to me it is about time.
And this is not about the country.
This is not about hating America.
It's about recognizing that the people that are pretending
to represent you are not representing you.
In fact, they're representing foreign interests.
And even if you don't believe that what they're doing
around the world in your name is criminal,
and that should matter to you.
So anno continues going, don't you think
that those undermining democracy in Georgia are rather those
foreign agents lobbying against the law
that the representatives they voted for are voting
for inciting protest in Georgia?
Meaning you blinken people like you inciting protests in
Georgia and putting sanctions as you're doing
to punish Georgian elected officials for passing a law
that their people want.
Because that's what anyone
with any common sense would conclude.
Now, you could of course, argue that that's not
what the people want,
but in any sense, you don't just pretend democracy is only
when things go with the direction you think
is how they're supposed to go.
That's not democracy. It's the same illusion.
And again, I will always argue that I do not believe
that Hamas being voted in was a legitimate election.
It's my personal opinion. But the narrative is
that they were voted in, right?
That they gave them an election,
they voted in the terrorist group.
That's, well, that's why we know they're bad, right?
Let's just pretend that's the truth.
So you gave them democracy
and they chose, and now you don't like that.
So you turn it away. How do you not see,
even the lie shows you that they don't respect democracy.
It's a game. It's a game of control.
And this is what their supposed inter rules-based
international order actually looks like.
It is authoritarian control.
You know, it's lipstick on a pig is what it is.
And here he highlights Sky News
breaking the International Court of Justice.
The ICJ has ordered Israel to stop it's offensive in Rafa.
This is 24th.
And he says there's no playing around this one.
It really puts all states
and individuals still supporting Israel in front
of a pivotal choice.
Now that, regardless of what you think about this,
'cause trust me, there's a lot in this that I'm right down
the middle on where I, I understand
how international law can be weaponized,
but I also equally understand in many cases why general
norms or international law around the world are important.
Even if you argue they shouldn't have a mechanism to use
that or to enforce it is still important that we understand
what we all collectively agree are the norms.
You know, like not murdering children.
I think we all agree on that, even though some of them
who say that don't actually think that,
but he says that the pivotal choice here, you continue
to support the, and thereby unequivocally declare
that international law has no meaning at all,
which is what they're doing right now.
Or finally, admit Israel must be stopped.
So, but, but if you argue there's no law,
well, how does that apply then?
How are you suddenly arguing that the
other countries have to abide by it?
He says, I strongly suspect the US will choose the former.
They'll probably make it seem like they want Israel to stop,
but we'll tacitly support them.
And he says, which will raise a very
serious question for the rest of the world.
What shall we do when it's clear to all
that the world's foremost power has become a rogue state?
At some point, there needs to be some form of accountability
and pushback, or an incredibly dystopian precedent is being
set here, which may be the very point.
Now, I really do believe it's important
that we have a nuanced understanding of this
because look, I the idea
of international law does not necessarily mean
that some foreign international body has
control over states.
That's not sovereignty, in my opinion.
However, there are levels
of agreement like not being forced into it,
but having your supposed representative government agree
to a certain level or a certain charter where they say, yes,
we're bound by this charter.
We argue we're supposed to abide by it.
And the point being the same kind
of thing we're seeing today, I mean, it's
the same conversation we're having.
The point is that we can see it's already been weaponized.
We can see that the US and Israel con veto and change it.
We already know this doesn't work the way it is.
It doesn't mean that there shouldn't be some kind
of collective understanding.
Here's what Assad md Assad MD points out,
and this is important because it shows you that
as they're playing this line,
they've lost control everywhere in Israel,
the United States, around the world.
He says, IDF, major general, its sock brick has says, quote,
if Bebe Gallant Vy and their outg and
and their outgrowths remain in power, the state
of Israel will deteriorate to its end.
They will take us down to shield the underworld in grief.
He says, think about saying that right now,
to the point being that there,
I argue there's two things happening.
One, that's the reality.
Their actions have destroyed everything.
And I think we all see that this is an attempt
to say it's just them right there.
We need to get them outta the way
so we can go back to normal.
Which by the way, will never happen
because too many things have been understood
and, and realized.
But they'll try, try.
Well, and they even, they even
throw in gland right there, right?
But whether it's smoke
or somebody else next in line,
these people have all supported what's going on.
But he says, quote, there has been a collapse
of the economy, global boycotts
that are now beginning at an accelerated pace, a collapse
of society, a collapse of the army,
and a collapse of all international relations.
We are in a war that has no purpose.
He says, we cannot defeat Hamas, he says,
and they are running to prepare
themselves for the great war.
He is calling it all out guys in hopes
that you let them take control.
I think even though they're in many ways justice alarming.
But this is Jerusalem post.
Netanyahu has gone off the rails, taking country down,
says former I of official,
how in the world do you pretend like what's funny is you've
got this kind of Republican two party paradigm conversation
like we just saw with, with pimp Tim Pim tool and,
and, uh, and A RFK.
And then yet you've got this,
and you get the, anybody aware of the reality, realizing
that this has completely fallen apart already.
They've lost this. And if you think,
even if you wanna pretend that other elements could make it
better, which I disagree with, it still has
to be acknowledged that this is genocide.
They did this. They other people seem to be acknowledging
that now and recognizing
that they are destroying their country in the process.
Imagine trying to pretend that's not happening right now.
Where is everybody
trying to pretend like this isn't happening?
Like I'm all about talking about other topics.
Like I'm, I'm not even gonna pretend
that people are out there that like,
maybe you're only focused on medical freedom,
that they should be talking about this.
It's, I've never said that. I, I think it's important
that people, if you have your niche,
that you don't feel dri driven
to start covering something you don't feel comfortable with.
But there are people out there that cover a lot
of foreign policy that have been
very silent about this topic.
And you know who I'm talking about, or I should say who,
but you know exactly what I'm talking about.
I don't even necessarily have somebody
in mind when I'm saying that, but it's true.
Now, here's another example. And the same direction.
This is, so I was gonna cover this a few days ago,
and I wish I would've because it kind of circulated
and it was, I it was really early when I had it pulled
aside, but I wanted to wait for a way to include it.
And I forget who shared it first.
It was somebody that wasn't even somebody I recognized.
But in any case, here's Lord Bebo.
I defined it again, sharing this.
And Israeli soldier says
that a hundred thousand soldiers are with Netanyahu,
and that they will not give the keys to Gaza
to Palestinian authority for ta, Hamas or any Arab entity.
They will stay in Gaza until the end if they have to.
It says they will not listen to the defense minister
or the chief of staff, but only Netanyahu.
And here is interestingly, it was shared by Netanyahu's son
posted the video of the soldier threatening defense minister
Gallant calling for the rebellion against them.
So now what you're seeing is even more the fracturing
of the society where you've got people in Gaza saying
that we're not gonna allow some kind
of agreement showing you that.
I mean, not only are they lost control,
but this is, this is the whole game
of like the inmates running the asylum, right?
You've gotten pe this is why you're seeing videos
of soldiers posting things on TikTok
and nobody seems to care
because their, their hair is on fire.
They've lost control. I don't even think they had much
control over these people in the first place.
But now you've got splits down the middle within themselves,
arguing We're gonna fight for the, you know, destruction
of all of Gaza versus deals they're making
or different people they're aligning with.
You got people above all
of them going, all of them have to go.
I mean, this is alarming.
And the reason I say that is
because this could lead to something irrational, you know,
the launching of something they can't
take back for their own interest.
I mean, this is where, like I said, about Ukraine.
In fact, on that funny side note, I just saw a video
of Zelensky screaming about how the,
like the other countries
that aren't supporting anymore might be secretly
working with Russia .
It's just they have lost the plot.
It, this is what happens when you work with criminals, guys.
Nothing is sacred. And now you're seeing this splitter down
the middle in Israel, which by the way,
is not something we should relish necessarily.
'cause it's only gonna cause more
pain for everybody involved.
It's not desperately on one of these sides.
But here's what Mike Pompeo had to say, right?
Striving for relevance, as I think he wants
to desperately be part of the next
President Trump's campaign.
He says, the ICJ is a morally corrupt
and broken institution,
but you can a absolutely make that argument.
That's your opinion. It's morally corrupt, it's broken.
Those are just opinions, right? That you could level.
I I could say that about Mike Pompeo. He is morally corrupt.
He's a broken person. Certainly, certainly my,
but if I was to say Mike Pompeo works for Hamas
or works on behalf of Hamas,
he'd have every right to laugh at me.
Because how in the world could I know that
unless I've got a document over here
or a photograph of 'em doing X, Y,
and Z, that's just my really, really childish
and irresponsible opinion, right?
So here's how we finish that sentence, this ig say, uh,
the ICJ is a morally corrupt
and broken institution working on behalf of Hamas.
I just think this is worthy of ridicule.
These people have gotten so cartoonish,
they're usually very clear liars,
but I mean, make a logical argument.
Say that the group is inadvertently working
in the interest of Hamas.
Like to say that they're working to argue
that the world court is literally in some kind
of a secret agreement with a small group in Gaza is stupid,
but he's just trying to tap into whatever desperate
thread they think they can grab.
And Ian Carol says,
you're a professional intelligence agency liar.
And in fact, he's doing a terrible job at it right there.
But he says you're doing
the opposite of what you think you're doing.
Exactly. And interestingly enough, they, I mean, you know,
Mike's over here getting ratioed
and he's, you know, it's, it's hilarious.
I don't think these people realize
that they're hurting themselves or the whole argument that
who needs friends or
who needs enemies when you've got
friends like Mike Pompeo, right?
But here is, in addition to all of that today,
after they just burned a people alive today,
Israeli soldiers are demolishing a home in Rafa
and celebrating and posting it.
The video is from today.
The point is, they're just posting videos
of them destroying poems in a place.
They just burn people alive and laughing
and having a whole jovial time about it.
And, you know, speaking of morally corrupt,
here's a few more examples of Giannis ROI showing you
what the most moral army in the world is doing in the places
that they're stealing from after they burn them alive.
And just place them for the 45th time, you know,
robbing them of their watches
and their rings, taking things from their homes,
taking pictures, burning their homes down,
laughing about destroying what's theirs.
This is the reality of what they're doing on a daily basis.
And he is doing an amazing job highlighting all of this.
Here is a really important one that he's tagged.
The ICJ, which they keep using
by the way they referenced one of his last ones
because he's proving this stuff.
It's not just some random person posting what he thinks.
These are being taken directly from their own platforms,
TikTok, Instagram.
And he has all the receipts
and usually posts 'em all links and everything.
And he, ICJ just referenced one because he could prove it.
He says this way, read the whole thread.
He says, disturbing language.
Israeli military commanders
and officers in many, many, many examples, calling
to kill civilians, direct quote, kill children,
direct quote, starve Gaza to death, direct quote,
erase Gaza.
All of them spread diseases among civilians.
This is disgustingly horrifying.
They're doing, they're praising, posting about,
laughing about all the things they're
pretending aren't happening.
All the things that RFK Jr.
Distressed are completely fake and anti-Semitic.
And of course, here's Elon Levy, desperate for attention,
jumping in and saying Israel needs, guess what?
As they've never been more called out
for more crimes in their entire existence.
Israel needs an elite unit of spokespeople.
He really wants that job back in every language,
in every time zone.
It's public diplomacy. Efforts are long overdue. Yeah.
So what he's saying is, we're desperately losing.
So we need to make sure we've got somebody in every
location, in every time zone, in every language,
screaming the narrative, which still won't work
because your narratives are flimsy and childish.
You can't just go Hamas, you and shields anti-Semitic
and act like that's gonna win an argument right now.
It's not. Now we just talked about
western nations move to recognize Palestine, right?
Spain, Ireland, Norway, the first.
Anyway, it's important
because interestingly enough, there's a lot
of overlap to this here.
First and foremost here is what the three of them stood up
and said on the, this was, uh, they held a press conference
on the eve of their recognition of Palestine.
And they vow a joint determination to make a fundamental
paradigm shift to end 76 years of international neglect.
So it's important to recognize not only are they standing
by this and more countries are gonna follow
suit, I believe some already have.
They're telling you, we are making sure this
is not just our statements.
We are gonna make a fundamental paradigm shift.
And that is terrifying these people
because this is exactly what they most dread, the rapid
and growing awareness that
they're not what they say they are.
And of course, remember,
and this I wanna talk about the two state solution.
'cause that's their main point. They're forcing, they're,
they're gonna make sure people recognize the reality
of the two state solution.
So first and foremost to highlight, you know, Mr.
Brian Mass here, who seems
to very clearly be somebody working on the behalf
of a foreign government acting like he's interested in the
acting, in the interest of Americans.
I wanna make sure you didn't miss this.
So Brian Mass says, every week hundreds
of pro Hamas protestors come to Congress,
and almost all of them are constituents from his area.
They scream and shout and harass lawmakers. No.
They go there and say, we want
you to stop committing genocide.
And that's intimidating to him probably is
because he knows he's committ, committ,
you know, treason and, and crimes.
They says they won't succeed. Why?
He says that's because for every code, pink moron,
in other words, his constituents,
they're someone like Benny Charlo
or Benia Charlo, who by the way is an IDF soldier
who just got back from Rafa.
Not an American who got back from Rafa,
but an Israeli who's there from Rafa speaking in Washington,
the lawmakers, right?
He says, that's who we should be listening to. Okay?
So just in case you don't understand the point
here is an alleged US representative openly disregarding,
attacking, denigrating his own constituency while going even
further by saying he, instead of listening to them, listens
to a member of a foreign nation's military.
And that's who we should be listening to.
He says, how is this even remotely acceptable?
Cries of antisemitism are not gonna hide this.
So here is his effort clearly on behalf
of a foreign country, in my opinion,
and again, there's a lot more than my opinion involved here,
but let's realize that what he's saying here is alarming
because they're acknowledging publicly
and in fact trying to, in a kind of clumsy way,
make it the argument that they're supposed
to be deciding who's in charge.
I was making this point earlier, the only people
who should be deciding who's in charge of Palestine or Gaza
or the West Bank are Palestinians.
Because what the conversation is about
is a two-state solution.
Even though we know he doesn't want
that, has made that very clear.
But the question is, well, who's gonna run it?
And he tries to make this
statement out to be some kind of a gotcha.
But her point is very clear.
Well, it's not for our, it's not for us to decide.
And he acts like they can't even, they don't even know he,
he either is that stupid, that doesn't realize
that it's not democracy to choose a leader for them,
or he just hopes you don't know that
- You reviewed your testimony, your request for budget, uh,
the discussion of post-conflict needs in Gaza,
what you're requesting there,
and specifically your statement in your written testimony
about a two-state solution is the best way
to ensure Israel's future as a Jewish
and democratic state living in peace alongside a viable,
sovereign and democratic Palestinian state.
Uh, as part of your testimony, it's fair
to say you're the chief diplomat
for America over the mid east, the, the top dog as they say.
That would be a fair, a fair, uh,
categorization of yourself.
Yes. Yes ma'am. And turn your microphone
up so everybody can hear you.
Very good. So my first question, I've asked this of others
before, have you objectively assessed, uh, your pursuit
of a Palestinian state?
- So congressman, when have I objectively, uh,
uh, uh, assessed it?
Meaning are the conditions there right now?
They're not right there. Did you,
- They're not objectively do you just decide, hey,
I think there should be a Palestinian state,
or did you objectively look at this
- Longstanding policy?
And it's certainly been the stated
policy of this administration,
- But did you, and by the way, note that he,
whoever's doing this, or he himself edited this in a very
clumsy way, which makes me wonder
'cause I I didn't even ma To me it doesn't even matter.
It doesn in a larger sense.
I guarantee there's more to this conversation
that he didn't want you to hear.
But even then, what he includes makes it very clear.
But just note that he edited this very clearly.
- You personally, as the top dog over the Middle East,
objectively assess
- The top dog over the Middle East.
Think of the hubris involved with
that kind of perception. Yes.
- Whether we should make a state out of a group,
- Make a state.
Oh, so now you're making states, Brian, is
that how that works is that democracy
- That currently holds five Americans hostage,
roughly five Americans hostage. We know,
- But we don't care about the 600 Americans in Palestine
that were there before the Palestinian Americans.
I post that every time he makes this commitment.
He doesn't care about them. He only cares about seemingly
anything Israeli connected, even if they're Americans,
only if it's an Israeli overlap.
There are 600 plus Americans that are trapped in Gaza
that are bombed and killed, including
by the way the bombings coming
from them that killed hostage too.
But points the same, killed
- 35 Americans in the last couple months.
Did you objectively assess?
- So Congressman, we have no intention of working
with Hamas in that, in that, uh, in that endeavor.
What we're talking about is something entirely different.
- I would hope you don't. Yes.
So let me ask a a a question related to that.
Who do, but you did objectively assess this? Yes. Okay.
Who did you objectively assess would become the leader
of the Palestinian state that you wish to create?
- It's not for us to, to designate a leader,
- But if you are objectively assessing whether the
United States of America should put resources into creating
a Palestinian state
as the top diplomat over the Middle East, we would expect
that you objectively assessed who would become the,
- Okay.
So his point is that if we can sense
that they'll pick somebody we don't like,
then we shouldn't go forward.
So democracy doesn't count if we don't like the outcome.
I don't even think his brain is wrapped
around what he's making happen here. Leader
- Of this state.
- No, it is not for us to, to determine that.
- I didn't say you're gonna determine it.
I said, who do you objectively assess? Mm-Hmm.
will be the leader of that. I don't.
- Right. And his point is that if you ob,
if you objectively argue in your assessment
that Hamas is likely going to be elected again, then what?
You shouldn't do it that we shouldn't support it.
So all you're really arguing again is that if you assess
that the choice in the supposed democracy will be someone we
don't like or, or appreciate
or work with, then we shouldn't support democracy.
Is that how democracy works? You just choose it.
If you like the outcome. I mean, come on guys.
These are supposedly leaders
or rulers with power over your lives.
It's embarrassing. I don't
- Have an, I don't have an objective
assessment as to who will be the
- Leader.
So you did not objectively assess
who would become that's leader.
- He's playing word games. He's
trying to make a gotcha moment.
And I don't think he's actually
understanding what he's making clear
- Of the state that you wish to make. No,
- The state that you wish to make it is, it's incredible.
The idea, okay, first of all,
if we're talking about a two state solution, it only exists
because we're talking about two entities.
One that was there before, one that's occupying the area.
It's not like you're just poof,
magically making something that wasn't there.
You're simply working with the two in dispute
and acknowledging the borders.
But I actually don't think Brian understands that.
- So you don't assess, well maybe you can do it right now.
Would you assess the Hamas would be the leader of that?
- Oh, who didn't see that coming? Absolutely
- Not Palestinian, Islamic Jihad.
Absolutely not. fta,
- FTA is not the leader of anything right now. I'm asking,
- IM asking you if you assess.
- FTA is an organization, it's a political organization.
- Brigade No, absolutely. Lions Day. Any
- Of, okay, so just, just to clear,
what he's doing here is listing off
all, he's trying to make a point.
These are all the groups that are possible.
And why is that the case?
Because that's all that's been allowed.
And Israel has funded that into reality
and driven the circumstances
to make sure they can always point to these groups
and they look at that's who they really are.
And even then, that's
the perception they're putting forward.
A lot of these groups are simply actual resistance groups
who are fighting for the independence of Palestine.
But overall, the point is that he's trying
to make out the case that there's nobody
legitimate that they can work with.
So you don't care about democracy if you don't like the
outcome, but you have manufactured that outcome.
That's the overall reality.
- The any of the FTOs, any
of the organizations that we have.
- Oh, and the other point as well that you're trying
to make, the point is that there's nobody
that every single group that they have a possibility
of choosing, which by the way, they're not choosing,
they can't be like, well I wanna
pick this guy over here in Lebanon.
Right? That's so they're only in this controlled area,
which Israel still controls.
They only have so many choices.
And your point is that none of them are, are valid.
So therefore they can't have a state,
like do you not realize how manufactured that
- Is designated as foreign terrorist organizations are?
Exactly. That, that is not what we're talking about.
- But certainly as you being our top diplomat in the area,
you should be able to understand that we should have every
expectation that if you're pursuing
creating a Palestinian state,
- It's not your choice, Brian.
That not the US government's choice, Brian.
It is about legitimate, it's about the,
it's about self-determination
and the legit legitimacy of the re the,
the well rather the
situation before ever any of this started.
The idea, well, even if you as many do dispute the
discussion of what came first, the standing
of the current law is that it is occupied,
therefore they have a right to this.
Whether or not Brian or the US government decides
that it should happen, the hubris is overwhelming. You
- Would've objectively assessed
who you think would be the leader of that.
Now let me ask you something else.
Do you objectively assess
that if they were made a state today, that they would have
to be labeled a state sponsor of terror
- ?
Who is the day they in that question? Yeah.
- A Palestinian state, right? Yeah. So
- Just be clear.
He is clumsily, conflating all of Palestine
with any other group he thinks are terrorists,
even though most of them are labeled terrorists
for arbitrary reasons because they're fighting against
Israel's occupation.
But that's his argument that
why wouldn't they be labeled a state?
'cause they're all terrorists,
Palestinian terrorists. Right?
- Would it, were a Palestinian state
created prior to October 7th.
Would it be a state sponsor of terror today? What's the,
- Why would that even be a question?
What are you asking? Uh, why if Palestine's
Palestine was acknowledged to be what it should be,
that we would have to label them terrorists?
Well, yes, that's actually what you understand.
That's the truth leaking through their policy.
That's what Israel enforced the,
our controlled US government to absolutely do.
Even though we're really just talking about the
acknowledgement of something that was already there.
- Theoretical question I can't answer. Would
- You label them a state sponsor of terror today? A
- Theoretical question.
- Now you're just acting like people, especially one in the
past, people do DC would you label them a state sponsor?
Do they meet the the requirements?
Who's the Yeah, well their government is Hamas. No,
- If you're talking about - Now he's playing,
that's really stupid.
You're saying should we commit, create a state
with a hypothetical leader that we don't know
'cause it's democracy and they'll pick even though he
doesn't want it to be the case and is already
saying that won't be the case.
But now he's just conflating that
with the current Hamas government
that was literally put into place by Israel funded
and whether or not you think the election was legitimate
maintained by Israel ever since
- Hamas.
I've already answered that question already,
- But that is their government.
- No, but we're not talking about right.
Gaza, we're talking about a Palestinian state. Exactly.
That's a larger question.
And it would be a negotiated process.
- Who would negotiate that?
- The US would, would offer its good offices
to negotiate between the parties.
- So we would negotiate it,
but it's not up to us to think about who would be the leader
of that Palestinian state in the
past. You should not objectively
- Assess, have never in the past designated leaders. And
- That's a flat out lie.
I can play you the clip right now
of Newland being caught on the record.
She handpicking who would be in charge of Ukraine,
but let's protect, and I'm not saying she knows
that she probably doesn't
- And in the, the guise of such negotiations.
- Okay, so I don't think
what you're saying exactly adds up here
that you wouldn't assess
who would be the leader of this pal.
- She did, she didn't say that he, this is so bad.
I, you know, I don't know how these people find themselves
in these positions where they think they're the smartest
person in the room where clearly they're not even very lo
their, their logic is kind of the opposite.
She already said very clearly she assessed this,
but it's not their place to be able to decide.
Obviously we can assess
that it might be any one of these groups.
And you know, very clearly with your line of questioning
that Hamas and s is how, uh, PIJ are very clearly the people
that seem to have the most support,
but who ultimately knows what will happen here.
His point is he wants her to say out loud
that Hamas seems like a logical choice
and maybe it would be, but the overall point he's failing
to recognize as he's highlighting the democracy only
matters when they get what they want.
- Palestinian state - For the Palestinians
to d to determine, but we're not talking. But the
- Palestinians, we determined this in the past
and they determined Hamas would be their leadership polling
after polling shows they would choose Hamas. Their
- Leadership is the, is the recognized
representative of the Palestinian people.
Hamas is an FTO and lies outside of the PLO. You think
- The PLO is recognized as the leadership
by the Palestinian people.
- The Palestinian authority governs the
PLO is the representative.
- You think that's what the Palestinian people think?
- I haven't done polling on this recently, uh,
- But as the top diplomat over the Middle East,
I would expect that you've reviewed
- This.
But the PLO is the entity that
did the Oslo agreement with Israel.
- It appears to me as my time has expired,
I thank you for trying to answer.
You have not objectively assessed whether
- He said objectively assessed 47, I mean, I don't know
what 15 point times he was really coming out outta the
gate to try to make a point.
It's all he was doing. And you know what?
Sadly, that's what most of these career politicians do.
They come in there and they wanna be all pithy and smart
and make a, they're trying to make a point about
how I got this gotcha moment and, and like, like St.
St and her ridiculous crusade
to lie about antisemitism on these campuses.
They're just there to grandstand and try to make a point.
And half the time they make themselves look stupid.
- There. It is wise for America
to pursue making a state out of Palestinians.
And I suggest you do as the top.
- We don't make the mistake, Brian
learn something about history and international law.
My point is he doesn't, he doesn't even care.
I think he's there for a very clear reason
to cement a certain narrative.
That's why he's acting in the interest of a foreign country.
David Collier says, dear Spain, Ireland, Norway,
all the countries that have argued Palestine
is a state and they'll recognize it.
And that's why the International Court
of Justice remember is dealing with them
because they have already acknowledged them as a state.
Why? Because it was, and it's currently occupied.
It's pretty easy to understand.
He says, your government websites have not adjusted the
figure for Palestinian refugees removing all those
that now live in their own state.
Like he's trying, he thinks he's making a smart point.
Well, first of all, it hasn't happened yet buddy.
And the reality being
that they acknowledge it exists doesn't change
that you're still occupying it
or that you still won't let that happen.
They're acknowledging what should be the reality.
Just because they say it should be does not mean they then
remove Palestinians who are still in cells in your jails
or locked in Gaza
or elsewhere from the reality of refugee status.
All they're trying to do is play on the ignorance
of average people to act like,
well that's all that counts, right?
They have their own place. No, the right
of return is not just about having their own state,
it's about getting back the territory
that they were stolen from or was stolen from them.
Now of course they could choose to forego
that if they get their own state,
but that would be up to them in the regard.
Well, I think arguably it would come down to the agreement
that the un under the dis the
and the leadership of Palestine and whether
or not the areas are within what they think is their right
of return and the ones that might not be,
would be agreed to forego.
My point though is that they don't,
are the states acknowledging that they exist, suddenly argue
that they're no longer refugees.
Again, the investigative journalist must know that
he's either this bad at his job
or is absolutely lying for clear reasons.
But he says, can you please do, can you please do so
as your numbers are wrong now?
Oh, and can you please stop funding ra?
Oh wait, so you are
admitting it's about the right of return.
You are admitting RA's about the idea of keeping documents
to know where they're pick what they should be able
to go back from, from occupied territory.
Ah, I got it. You realize they've lied about
that every time it comes to pass.
No RA's about, uh, un terrorists working from us.
No, it's about understanding
that you guys have continued to occupy them ever since.
Right? That it's funny
how this guy accidentally admits things all the time,
but Michael Rappaport does the same thing,
actually citing this other Zionist supporter,
propagandist female Zionist.
That's her bio because I,
I doubt Michael Apport could
even string this many words together.
But here's what she says. He highlights
the same game they're playing, he says, so you want
to recognize the state of Palestine?
By all means, go ahead.
Just make sure to note
that since Palestine is a state no one living in it is
or can be recognized by your country
as a refugee from Palestine that you are
therefore defunding unre.
Ah, same point. You guys
don't realize you're admitting things.
You keep lying about that there is no
such thing as the right of return.
Oh, there it's again into another
sovereign state in which one?
Well, okay, that wouldn't necessarily be incorrect,
but the point is that hasn't happened yet.
So are you, are you guys pretending
that the state they just argued is they controlled the
occupied territory of Gaza?
They're just playing on the ignorance of people
and hoping they can get some kind
of a gotcha moment overall.
Should there be an agreement
with the international community and Israel
and Palestine that they've agreed to borders?
Well then you could just start, discuss whether
or not there are areas outside of that that would now be
considered no longer part of Palestine.
And then you would forego that right of return for those,
assuming that they believe
in the government that made that choice.
Either way, the point is that
that will be a legitimate path forward.
They're just trying to pretend like,
because Norway said it is, suddenly
that doesn't matter anymore.
Unreal. She, she goes on to say, if you're not ready to do
so as a package, then please don't pretend that the purpose
of recognizing Palestine is to promote a two-state solution.
Well, nobody even asked how much you wanna bet.
If you asked Norway, Spain, and PA and Is
and Ireland that they would be like, well yes,
that's exactly what we're asking for.
You're arguing with nobody and
acting like you just won something.
She goes, given that there was never a moment in the last
century when there was an Arab Palestinian vision of peace,
except there was numerous times including 67
that they made sure wouldn't happen.
But she either doesn't know that as lying about it.
And two states were one of the states is Jewish,
which means acceptance
that no one is a refugee from Palestine.
Well, yes, if that were to be finished
and accomplished, not just stating things out loud,
you must be smart enough to know that
when already living there are, or as citizens of Jordan
and other countries, because those people have chosen
to go about their, the point is it's not your choice
to decide they should give up their rights.
Many of them are still standing by their territory
that they want to go back to their home that's been
with their family for generations.
Just because some of them just either maybe didn't have the
land or didn't care, they moved to Jordan.
They just say, you know what? I'm done.
That's not your decision to make. I mean you get the point.
It's all the same thing. The whole thing.
A recognition of a state of Palestine is a great way
to finally clarify is the other state in the two states
solution, the Jewish state of Israel, yes,
nobody anywhere is arguing otherwise.
Everybody in this conversation other than Zionist maniacs
have made it clear since 67 forward.
And I mean the predominant part of this conversation today
that there is a state of Israel.
You got, you call it the Jewish state alone if you want
and keep maintaining your racist and bigotry.
And the other one would be a state of Palestine
that is respectively to their own self-determination.
They never will allow that.
Now, we also talked about the idea
of the binding international legal obligations of the ICJ.
I think it's important to understand
that they have continued to ignore this.
Even the group screaming about international law like
Blinken saying, the difference between us
and Hamas is that we respect international law
and then blinken disregards international law
or it, I mean, not that that's even new look
to every other field of war they've ever been involved in
and ask yourself if they're actually
abiding by international law.
And just because the United States government never has,
does not suddenly mean Israel can pretend
that they're not responsible for what they're doing.
But Lindsey Graham of course says, as far as I'm concerned,
the I CJ can go to hell.
He's an absolute maniac and here is a good picture for that.
And what I think Solomon Point
or yeah, Solomon Ahmed points out, ugh, these people are
so fr anyway for the podcast,
you really gotta look at that picture.
But we said this earlier before in previous show.
He simply says they've already
left the diplomatic vocabulary.
Not even the biggest dictators in the world
use that kind of vocabulary.
They're, they're just showing you what they really are.
Tom Cotton of course, comes out
and realize this was the 24th, both Lindsey
and Tom Cotton saying we don't have to listen to them.
And what were they asking? Don't do what they did to Rafa.
Don't go into Rafa.
Lindsey Graham says, well, you don't have to listen to them.
So he is completely complicit in the murder
of these people in Rafa
and every other part of this Tom Cotton, same thing.
24th, a fake globalist court issued a fake order. Right?
Again, this is the court. Now you, again,
I have criticisms like anybody about the lack
of accountability, especially from these two groups,
especially when regard to Israel until now.
But a lot of other examples, it's a political entity.
Everybody's aware of that.
But for them to say it's now working for Hamas
or a fake carrot or a fake order, it just shows you
that the very least, even if you think it should be
different at the moment, you have people
who are actively disregarding what they have always said.
We should all be listening to international law.
And it goes in fake order to Israel, not to defend itself.
You know, exci, despite the fact
that the expert on the topic said that that's not possible
for an occupied dare occupying territory,
but I'm sure Tom Cotton knows better.
You know the guy who stole all that gold from Iraq.
And he says, how about this court order Hamas
to release the hostages?
I can't believe they still think this argument makes sense.
You know, despite the fact that almost every entity, the UN
and otherwise have all said, release the hostages,
release the hostages incessantly.
But their only argument is why don't you order them to, so
what happens when they do that?
And nothing changes. Like again,
you are the one telling us this is a terrorist organization.
So you're telling us that the only thing we should be doing
is passing legislation and, and,
and agreeing on resolutions that ask them
or demand them to do what they don't care about.
'cause they're a terrorist organization. It's stupid.
The only thing they want you to do is act like the only
thing you should be doing is going terrorist Hamas,
terrorist Hamas and everything else is okay.
How about you do both? How about you go Hamas
with these sausages and Israel,
you're responsible for your actions.
No, you're a bad person.
And of course, human shields, political PAs,
these people are not working for Americans.
And again, Sam Hussein, he made the very clear point that
what we're dealing with right now, this is according
to Article 41 of the statute under the the ICJ, that, that
what they just did has binding effects
and creates international legal obligations for people whom,
whom the provisional measures are addressed.
So right now that's Palestine
and clearly Israel acting in Palestine.
And then for, for the Geneva, uh, the Genocide Convention,
it's every entity that is abound by it
that is required to act, to stop this.
None of them care showing you
what international law really means to those in power.
Uh oh. Is it gonna crash on me? Nope. Almost.
I think it might be happening Now here's DA
David Collier again.
Hamas has over a hundred hostages. He says Hamas is in Rafa.
I'm sure he, he must know that somehow,
even though nobody else has been able to prove that,
despite the fact that not a single example
of a Hamas ever being killed anywhere
so far has ever been shown.
But yeah, he knows and he says the I CJ is basically telling
Israel it's not allowed to pursue Hamas
to rescue the hostages.
No, it's the same argument we just made a moment ago.
You're what you're saying is the only two things are bomb
everyone to death or do nothing.
That's the game they're playing.
Call for the hostage to be released.
No, there's a lot of other
things that could be going on here.
How about the fact that you could go in on the ground in a
surgical way and go after the people you claim are there
while actively trying not to kill civilian?
Nobody's doing that. In fact,
what they do when they're on the ground is accidentally kill
their own people pretty much every time.
Maybe not accidentally either way.
You look at it, this is not the only dynamic in play,
but that's what they want you to think.
Their their, their ham is bringing us.
'cause we, we can't just indiscriminately bomb everybody.
And really the top of
that is if you're telling us there's a hundred hostages in
Rafa, why did you just bomb all of Rafa
or indiscriminately bomb
where you're claiming they're supposed to be held?
Nobody with a brain can say that makes sense.
And Apex said, Israel's a democracy with a robust
and independent judiciary
that's fighting a just war in a moral manner.
Yeah. Clearly acting
for the international law or for the American country.
This is a group acting of the interest
of this is why we talk about this should be no, no matter
how you spend this APAC should be registered under Farra.
It is a group acting solely
in the interest of a foreign country.
There's no way around it. The point though is about the ICJ
and what they're saying is because they have an independent
judiciary that this shouldn't make sense.
And I made this point on the show recently,
and I'll include the links I did, I made here before,
and I think it's in this one I talked about it, the illusion
of the altruistic US government has been dismantled
by the ongoing Israeli genocide.
This is an article from 2018 from Canada's one
of Canada's top judges saying,
without an independent judiciary, judiciary,
Israel's cherished democracy will at risk.
And of course, the thing she was pointing
to later came to pass.
So her argument was, if that happens,
well it wouldn't be independent.
Well too late. We're already there. Okay?
And then here's even further,
here's, I showed you this before.
It was February 13th, 2023 thousands in Israel protest,
the Far rights government plan
to weaken the nation's judiciary.
These were the judicial reforms they were protesting
because what they do, they allowed people like Netanyahu
to just disregard what the Supreme Court
ruled because they didn't like it.
You know, ultimately saying that we are more in charge.
That's not an independent judiciary. Very, very clear.
My point is that if you're saying
that's why they shouldn't be investigated, well we can prove
to you that even Israelis do not think that's the case.
And actively the current leadership is as every way they can
undermining the controls.
So they can, and most importantly,
so Netanyahu can avoid going to prison,
but no matter how you spend this,
it's not even remotely what they claim.
So in every sense of the, of the every sense of
what the ICJ should be legally allowed to do,
this is exactly that.
This is what they were made for.
And on top of that, uh, uh, Jason just put up a good clip,
uh, on our, on our Tlab account today about
that exact segment, about the independent judiciary
and understanding that what they're doing is pretending that
that's the case when you can prove it's not,
but essentially making the argument for us
that this is why it should be happening.
And on top of that, we showed this recently.
This is the, the green countries
or those that support record Palestinian statehood.
And what he says is, we're always told
that the countries in gray are the international community.
Well, it's kinda hard to see that this, I mean,
at this point it's, it's very clear the minority.
So what it ends up being is the one
that see themselves as above the others.
That's not the way we're supposed to see this overall.
It's becoming clear that there's something
very wrong in all of this.
And the world is standing up as Sarah Abdullah rises.
This is South Africa rising for Palestine.
Look at this, look at this massive march.
Guys, Look at that
massive pro Gaza protest unfolds in Cape Town
with thousands demanding an end Israel's genocide.
Look at that support.
Now, this is an interesting post.
I'll play this video for you.
This is a young girl who
says, I'll just, I'll just let it play.
She talks in this, but this person, Carrie writes on top
of the video, it's going to be a nightmare
as these damaged IDF soldiers return
to the UK following their lawless reign of terror in Gaza.
So what she's asking is like,
shouldn't we be concerned about the idea
that you have people coming back from the open genocide
and are just arbitrarily killing?
I mean, the same points we made about what happened in Iraq,
you've got soldiers coming home
who just committed massive war crimes.
And we know what happened. There was a lot of fallout, a lot
of bad things that happened maybe in inadvertently
because they had whatever we call it these days, shell shock
or whatever the whole George Carlin joke is, you know,
whatever new name they've gave in it today, the idea
that war has broken these people.
'cause it's not normal. But she's making a great point
as she even gives you an example of an IDF member
that came back to uk, which
by the way shouldn't be allowed working
for foreign governments militaries.
And here's the way he acts,
shows you the kind of mindset that they have.
And this is not every IDF member,
but you can clearly see the ideology
of the Zionist government that does
influence their opinions.
- The only one genuinely afraid of the fact
that an ex IDF soldier attacked a woman
yesterday in white chapel.
He literally pulled her hijab off of her in London.
And when a woman intervened saying, you are disgusting,
you put your hands on women, like what is wrong with you?
He steps towards her and says this,
- I need you.
Repeat that dirty fucking Muslim. Her face,
- In case you didn't hear it, he called
it her dirty effing Muslim
- And assaulted a young girl and you,
- You, and then called her anti-Semitic for calling him out
- For a human being.
How dead. And you what? How dead. Look at you.
You're the one hands on women disgusting.
I'm I'm only trained as an MMA client.
You don't want to touch me. I you don't wanna touch me.
I I don't.
- He literally steps up to this girl, this woman,
and says, I'm an IDF soldier until a bigger man steps in.
And he cowers.
- Do you see how as soon as a man steps in,
he immediately cows and hides?
This is because occupation forces are not
taught to attack men.
They attack women and children
or they drop bombs on civilian populations.
He was arrested for racial abuse, I believe.
But this is why it's genuinely so scary, this concept
that British people serve in a foreign military
and retain their British citizenship.
'cause you should not be allowed to go
and commit war crimes to then walk the streets of the uk
as if that's perfectly normal.
And because Zionism is cemented in this like supremacist
belief system that perceives Arab people
and Muslim people as less, as less human,
that is why it's so fundamentally dangerous for them
to come back to the uk, which is incredibly multicultural
and spew their racist shit,
- Which by the way, they have a right to,
if we're gonna be objective and honest about it.
He didn't commit a crime as far as I can tell right there,
whether in the UK or not.
Just by yelling racist things
does not mean you committed a crime.
I know in the UK they claim that's a crime
and seemingly it's coming to the United States.
But yes, we should argue you're a disgusting person
and you need to be called out for it.
And I understand the concern if we're talking about people
murdering other children in genocide
or in in in Gaza committing genocide
and then coming up that I do consider a problem.
But we nonetheless need to acknowledge whatever her opinion
or anybody else that saying bad things
to people is not a crime, guys.
It's just not. These are free speech realities,
but still, that's why free speech should exist
because we should collectively say,
you don't deserve a place in our society.
Go wherever you want, just don't stay here.
That's, I think, important to break down right there.
Well, somebody says if he touched her, it's an assault.
Absolutely, but I just, I didn't see it in the video.
So yes, they said that, but I wasn't able to see it.
So I, I wouldn't argue. I know that's what happened.
But good point. If he, if he touched
that woman, then yeah, that would be assault.
But here is a couple, two, two points I wanna try
to wrap with reasonably quick.
And this is about the food discussion.
Arson osky yet again, keeps pushing this lie from Koga.
And this, this is the new one. This is from the 22nd,
and now they're saying 298 trucks.
Let's remember 500 or more was the, the low
before October 7th.
And that's where they were already food insecure.
And they keep pointing at this
and going, see, we're doing more than ever.
I mean, they're just, they, they, why,
why not just lie about the bigger
number if they're lying anyway?
Because they are. So my point is he goes, repeat
after me, not a famine.
Do the math on this. I didn't do it.
I it was what, like a hundred and something a, a week.
If you break down this number, it breaks down
to basically nothing.
And then we can prove to you what they're lying about.
Because on their own breakdown from uh,
the un, you can prove that they have almost brought it down
to nothing and nowhere over the entire span
so far from the seventh, had they even gotten close
to going over an average of 500 a day.
And that was again, what it was before, including fuel.
But in any state, the, the most
they've gone over here is what?
216. That's less than half of what they were getting before.
That's why they're starving.
Whether or not you have some places with enough
and some, the point is people are starving to death.
It's famine, not starvation, it's famine.
Despite all of the lies they're screaming their own numbers
prove that they updated this.
This looks like the new way they're showing this,
which I'm think is just because there's more information.
But this one actually, let's try and update it again.
This is from, uh, May 24th.
Remember I showed you guys do the number on this?
Let's see if it's, yep, this was today. Oh, look at that.
So this one's today. So first
let's go here and see how it changed.
So this is of May 24th. So again, same point.
Just different writing was 500 trucks before,
before October 7th.
And they're showing you yet again, look at this breakdown.
So this, this is, this is actually interesting.
They've now broken it down by area.
So you can see from October 7th, all the way to November,
they only allowed one location, which was Rafa.
That was it. And it was only 218 for the whole month,
or at least since October 7th,
which is, I mean, think about that.
If 500 a day, we're talking about 218 average
daily average never broke that November,
oh no, I'm sorry, I'm looking at that wrong.
So that was the total. So it's an average of seven a day,
218 total November, 2000 545
total, an average of 85 a day,
500 being the bare minimum before October 7th.
And they were still food insecure,
still only coming through Rafa.
Ask yourself why they were only allowing one crossing all
the way until December because they
manufactured this very clearly.
Then you jump up to opening barely Kareem Shalom
and still 105.
They never look at this. They broke these down even more.
They don't even get over 200 until May
and realize that they still only had two crossings open all
the way until April.
I mean, there's no way to misunderstand this.
Now it looks like there's four crossings
that they're somewhat open, but still they, they,
the point is they open more crossings,
but they diminish the daily average.
Now it's down to 57 a day.
My point in all of this is if they're pretending
that they put through 200 trucks, almost 300 on the 22nd,
it's verifiably false for both examples.
Even going back to the day
before it, you can clearly
see that they went down to nothing.
And even if they did,
it's still less than they could need to survive.
Now here's all the way up to the 27th.
Look at that. Look at that number.
Still 53 average a day.
I mean, it just, it pains me how obvious this is,
and your representatives out
there are still allowing this to happen.
Now, the chairman
of the Euro Bed Human Rights Group also highlights
that 70 different human rights groups have now publicly
called to recognize the famine ongoing in Gaza.
As they say, Israel makes starvation its weapon of war.
Here's the article itself.
70 human human rights groups
shouldn't be hard to wrap your mind around.
It's been discussed for a very long time.
Here is a new one from Amnesty, one
of the leading human rights groups, January 24th, 2024,
saying that was actually updated as of April 12th, 2024.
More than 250, not just the 70 here, two oh,
more than 250 humanitarian
and human rights groups around the world called
to stop arms transfers to Israel
and Palestinian armed groups.
But of course, they always do that
because this is a balanced day.
The point is that the only example we're really talking
about are the, I mean, the arms transfers.
All they're talking about when they talk about Palestine are
talking about the alleged allegations of that happening.
I don't think there's even a real, especially for
how tightly controlled this area is right now.
But even then, what we're talking about is stopping
arms transfers to Israel.
No one cares if Viva Kpa says Egypt is
refusing to allow aid into Gaza.
That's the game they keep playing, despite the fact
that we know for a fact as this,
this was the executive director for the Legal Center
for Freedom of Movement, who highlighted
that Koga is dumping goods in the side
of the cream Shalom crossing,
which can't be reached without Israel coordinating that,
and then mocks the international organizations
that can't reach the goods
because the, the lack of coordination, which by the way,
is exactly what they wrote.
Trucks are waiting for collection and distribution.
By the, I mean, it's, it's just on the surface.
Those on the podcast, I'm just
showing you the tweets they're putting out.
Maybe you should consider calling yourself the backbone
of humanitarian aid and Gaza, since others are, are able
to do what you cannot or shouldn't.
The point is that they're manufacturing the illusion
by dumping this into a place
that they won't let them get to.
And then even if they manage, they shoot them anyway.
That's already, I mean, even the US has said,
stop shooting the police, and yet they just lie about it.
As Ooff MD points out the IDF shut
down the rough of crossing.
What are you talking about? 'cause they did,
they're controlling the entire border, which by the way,
we said earlier, they're now controlling parts
of the Egypt area, which is a violation
of, uh, off the top of my head.
What was it called again? If you remember what the, the,
what the legislation was, I forget it,
but it's a violation of the Law s News Network highlights as
of the 25th due to the Israeli blockade
that they're pretending isn't happening.
And it's prevention of aid
and food entry into the rough crossing
with Egypt since its operation.
Tens of trucks carrying food was destroyed along
with thousands of tons of vegetables
that have rotted while waiting permission from the Israeli
occupation to enter the strip while people are starving.
Look at all, look at all these eggs somebody sent
that have rotted because they let them sit there.
But yeah, they're doing the best,
the most moral alarming in the world.
And here, just quickly is a little lie,
just continuing to show this.
Now, the best of my best,
I can tell this looks like an old video,
but in any sense, the important thing to understand
and what they're showing you is markets scenes
from the market in Rafa.
Well, there's two, three points to make here.
First of all, Rafa is the location
where they have been jamming everybody.
So there's going to be a lot of people, and there's,
and yes, there are still markets.
I don't know why they argue, because they have areas
where people are selling the, the little they can,
that somehow that's indicative of, like,
the argument is they're not.
So those children, we saw burned alive didn't count.
Like I just don't get the logic of the people that are
so desperately trying to hold on to, there's no genocide.
You're lying despite all the evidence,
despite all the human rights groups or the UN
and everybody else that can not just see it
and acknowledge it, but we can prove it.
Or even their own representatives said,
yes, this is what we're doing.
Or former Holocaust survivors or former IDF chiefs
or, I mean, it's just painful what people can ignore.
But even then, it's important to understand
that kogas already been caught lying in this
exact way one time.
You could prove that the banner that was
behind them showed you
that it was actually a video from
months before this ever started.
They know that they're choosing to lie to you,
but all they're trying to show you here is, look,
here's a market pretty scarce, by the way,
but with people, lots of people therefore look no genocide.
That's what they're trying to do.
Same thing here, and same video.
Here's what somebody
commented, you know, just their opinion.
No, he's saying that's what it looks like right now.
You could take it, you could dec decide for yourself.
I can't verify that those images are right now,
or it's been, I mean, the point is, this is in Rafa
and we know this is what they've been doing in any case, oh,
and then here's another one saying, look, this is what
that area looks like right now.
But again, you know, it, it's, I it's hard to tell
for sure who's lying and who's not.
My point is you can already tell, oh,
yeah, sorry, one more point.
This is the most mapped point here.
They're going, look, here's the market day
and the Warsaw Ghetto.
Can't you tell there's no genocide happening?
Like it's the same game, guys.
It's the same tactics even,
which I think is more exact than we realize.
It's, it's obvious propaganda.
My point though is from before,
as I've shown you many times, this was, it's important
because it's one of the provable examples.
There's been at least five
or six of them that I've caught them lying about.
But this is one of the most obvious.
Here's this guy an Orrin Barsky,
just somebody lying about this
who said, look, there's no famine.
Here's all the bread. It's a nurse. No rat, February 8th.
And the point was, Nope, that's a lie.
The bakery in this video was destroyed on, on OC in October.
It's gone. It doesn't exist. And where did he get that from?
Oh, that's right. He got it from Koga.
That's, that's them sharing the lie.
And of course, weirdly, they get a different message
that doesn't really prove what they're lying about.
It just says out of context, ,
you think that's by accident?
Somebody clearly made sure that
didn't show you what they're saying.
Yeah, it's the same video guys. See, they lied.
Koga knowingly lied about this
because the bakery that they are claiming is the one
that probably, there's always an image.
Somebody put it down here. It's that, yeah, right there.
That's, that's the new drop bakery right there.
That was on October. They get destroyed.
It wasn't rebuilt, but CogAT lied and they know they lied,
and yet the video is still up,
even though it got fact checked by Twitter.
That's the reality. Here's Powell.
I'm just simply showing you what, what this,
what overall we're dealing with here.
Look at this area, and she simply says,
the Holocaust card runs out when you commit one of your own.
I'm sure they'll call that anti-Semitic.
It's simply pointing out what they're using to argue
that this should not be allowed to,
they shouldn't be accused of something.
But while you are committing something to that level,
it's kind of hard to pretend like you're not at least
guilty of something.
And on top of all of that, Israel is hastily moving
to ban unah Gee, who didn't see that coming, right?
The group that they're acting like we shouldn't care about.
It's, they're, it's so desperate
and obvious that they've been going
after Uner from the very beginning
because it's the group that maintains the legal records
that they are in fact still committing an occupation,
which anybody knows at this point.
They've already lost control.
But it says the, also the primary relief
agency for Palestinians.
It says, before any war settlement is reached this act,
why can't I highlight this right now?
Uhoh, something's gonna, there you go.
Something's freezing on me.
It says, this action aims
to deprive Gaza's population over 70%
of whom depend heavily on their aid, which they turn around
and point to as why is that possible?
Well, you, you, the answer is the same.
It's because you've never allowed them to go back
to their own territory, many
of which have nowhere else to go.
It's not their fault that you did this to 'em.
It's not their fault you don't like them to, that you have
that their families have held on to
what they believe is theirs for 75 years.
It's not their fault. It's still your fault
for illegally occupying people,
but now they're gonna deem them a terrorist organization.
That's what they're doing. They're arguing
that it's a terrorist group.
They approved a preliminary reading designating un
unrested terrorist organization.
Well, that reminds me
of a previous example we played in the beginning.
Another group that they randomly decided was a terrorist
organization, only
because they were highlighting that a child was raped.
Because this is how the Israeli government operates.
Don't forget the example. We
- Have to condemn the atrocities that happen every day
to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
Uh, I was part of the human rights vetting process
for arms going to Israel
and a charity called Defensive Children International
Palestine, uh, drew our attention at the State Department
to the sexual assault, actually the rape
of a 13-year-old boy
that occurred in an Israeli prison in the
mosque beer in Jerusalem.
Uh, we examined these allegations.
Uh, we believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, uh, the government of Israel.
And do you know what happened The next day
the IDF went into the DCIP offices
and removed all their computers
and declared them a terrorist entity.
Um, I think it is vital that a trustee not happen to anyone.
Not sexual atrocity.
Not sexual violations, not any kind
of gross violation of human rights.
We are looking at a situation where there is so much
dehumidification where people are not seen.
- Yeah, that's exactly what, oh, oh, you, you,
you called us on our crimes.
You're a terrorist. Yeah, sounds exactly like
what you see everywhere else, right?
Oh, yeah. You're you're saying
Rocky occupy, you're a terrorist.
Oh, you're a racist. Same game.
So here to rapidly finish is the point we were gonna make
before, which suppressed news highlights.
The Israeli army found the bodies
of four prisoners in its search for others in Gaza.
They claim now, one
of them is the famous discussion of Shawnee Luke.
He simply highlights that. It says, confirmed this.
IDF spokesman said the bodies
of the abductees have been recovered.
So the his point is they're claiming that's confirmed
together in a joint operation.
The IDF forces and Shin bet the bodies of the abductees
of the Sheshaw, late Shawnee, Luke
and the other three were covered from Gaza Strip
to the territory of the state of Israel, their memory,
memory, be blessed.
And he says, always remember,
Netanyahu could have saved them.
Their government could have saved them, but chose not to.
It is an important point.
Even so, even if you think their story is true,
that everything I said is true, the point is
that they have turned down eight deals, as far
as I understand that ha they
that would've brought them home.
I think I have it in here somewhere towards the end.
I think it's right here, right there.
I'll come back to it. Oh, it's 11 different deals, many
of which were very, very clear that fine, we'll just give,
we'll give you everybody back if you just cease hostilities.
Those were happening the first couple of weeks.
They've now been proven.
They chose not to because they don't want these people back.
Now, more than that, there's something a bit more
interesting about this story to me,
understanding the history of this, remembering
that she was first seen on the back of that truck
then was a claimed to have been raped and murdered
and all this different ne without anybody knowing anything
that actually happened, which for right in the
beginning should have made you skeptical.
Clearly it was what hap what it looked like.
Yes, you can obviously argue it seems likely something bad
probably happened to her, but you don't know.
So as a journalist, which many of them did jump right in
and claim that you wouldn't be claiming
things without proving them.
Not a real journalist.
Now, the point is that she was then later proven
to be, actually, lemme see if I can grab that.
I probably not. Yeah, look at that. How weird.
This is from October 12th. Shawnee Luke is still alive.
Mother reveals Now, in this breakdown, they confirmed
that she was alive and that she was taken
to a hospital, right?
It says on Tuesday, family announced they had proof
that she was alive.
Swiss German language news outlet, brick Blick reported
that her mother said she was in a hospital in Gaza.
Now, I did the break breakdown on this
before in previous show, the hospital that she was confirmed
to have taken to within the next three weeks was bombed
and destroyed to the ground.
Okay, so how likely do you think it is
that she was called in the hospital by IDF bombs?
You can at least acknowledge that it's a possibility. Okay?
That's where I left it, because that's all we have,
you know, objectively going Well, that's,
that's the evidence you guys can decide as opposed
to screeching about the side.
You think it should be as two party illusions will do as,
as the Israeli government will do,
as the US government will do.
Okay? So we're left with that.
Then the story comes back around, right
where this one was October 31st,
they confirmed that she was dead.
Or actually, I think this one, oh yeah, this was next.
This was the one where they said that they found a piece
of bone, which then yeah, right there,
say they found a bone fragment from her skull.
But do you remember how that started, Mr.
Ridiculous, Zo Herzog, the supposed president, comes out
and says, we found her head.
Her body was decap. She was decapitated.
That's what he said. It's very easy to look up.
Then it came that, whoa, whoa, wait.
No, we, we found a piece of the bone from her head,
which was how we were able to confirm
that she was no longer alive.
Because without that piece, she couldn't be alive.
Then it became No, no, no, we found a sliver, a fragment
of bone, and this is not even the last one.
It was a sliver from her own parents' acknowledgement,
a sliver of bone that they did a DNA test on
that proved it was her.
So, hold on. So you got a sliver, a bone
that clearly somebody could survive without,
and you're claiming that, that her a was lying, gasp.
They were trying to use her memory for their own purposes.
Now, as the squirrel points out in October, the president
of Israel, Herzog said they were recovered her body,
but it was beheaded the points I was just making yesterday.
These Israeli government re regime again said they recovered
her body, yet the family saw it
and said, it's complete and beautiful.
So he skipped the middle part.
But this is the 18 or no, the first part.
Anyway, this is now the 18th of May.
Her family said they found her body complete and intact.
That was their quote, complete
and beautiful, which by the way also
suggests something very strange.
He said the jour her, again,
this is the first article from 30th found beheaded
after being taken to Gaza.
That was the president of Israel. Okay? Here is May 17th.
It says, the body that we have now is complete and beautiful
and looks like she's alive, actually.
So now we're gonna pretend that she was killed in October,
but her body's completely like,
it looks like it's alive right now.
So something's wrong here, clearly.
So he says, here's the president, this is
where he said this, who still is treated
as a credible source of information,
even though he is been caught lying about a fake book
that they claim was some kind
of chemical weapons instructions,
but it was actually a cover from Amazon that they found a, a
he, uh, Arabic version of Mecom for
that they found they have 1, 2, 3 instructions on how
to rape people like this.
Every one of these have been laughed at
and debunked saying that they found her beheaded.
He lied. Also,
body does not remain perfect for seven months.
That's an insane. So what happened here should be obvious
to anyone who isn't a liar.
The Israeli regime had her body all along,
that's very interesting.
Kept it on ice and then uncovered.
That's his opinion, of course,
certainly sounds like a logical consideration.
They recovered her body in October,
lied about it being beheaded and a skull fragment.
Now, that lines up with what I think
since we know the one thing we can prove is
that she was revealed alive
and she was in a hospital, which again, challenges the,
the lie about being the all the things.
Why would they take her to a hospital?
And on top of that, we have many examples
of them saying, don't touch the person.
They're protected by us.
The our, our religion says you're not allowed to touch.
Many times they could be lying, of course,
but the evidence piles up
before you can start leaning into what you think versus
what we can prove overall.
If they did then find her
after they bomb the hospital was bombed in this month,
which makes sense since they bombed it.
They went in, they took her body.
Now maybe she wasn't killed.
Maybe she wa I mean, I don't know.
A lot of this stuff doesn't seem like it adds up.
But in any case, what we know for sure is they lied about
what happened from the beginning to this very moment.
He says, these Zionists are most, uh, he just, oh,
he points it a bunch of different examples of the lies.
In any case, I think that's the relevant point.
You read the thread for yourself.
But look at what happened in this.
They're saying the bodies were found under an ra uh,
school building, right?
This is right after we talked about the idea,
not only just bomb ra
and Rafa under that same conversation,
they said this was in Rafa, right before this all happened.
Oh, oh look, we found all their bodies.
But the point here, and look,
my point is you can scroll down
and find out all these people were sharing the same claim
all in London, the ridiculous propagandist.
He's got what he is got like 45 facelifts.
I don't know what his story is, but the point is
that they're lying incessantly about the same things.
And what, and what's interesting is they say,
look, it's an unbuilding.
In fact, what it says, if you actually read
is the reconstruction
of the shelter was made possible by unre.
Sort of different than saying it's an UN facility.
But you know, facts and all, who cares about the facts?
As long as we can show a blue sign
and say Unid it, it's a building
that was reconstructed because of unrun.
Not necessarily an unre compound,
but they don't care about the facts here.
In any case, the point is they claim, look, it's a tunnel
and we claim we found things down there that that's it.
No evidence beside that.
But all these people know better
and they can tell you what they're told to think.
Aviva KPAs being one of them.
The dead bodies of hostages were found under the
unbuilding in Gaza.
There's not been a single word from the un. Wait.
So are you pretending the UN should just respond to
what you claim happened even though
you keep getting caught lying?
That's pretty stupid. But they say, he says,
this person says not true source please.
And this person says Israel newsfeed.
Here's those same images
that says that's where it was found.
And they go, A building that was reconstructed by under,
that's a far cry from under building,
suggests their building belongs the same point I made.
But here's a point I wanna make first
before we get into the other discussion,
that they just bombed this building
before they claim they found dead bodies in there,
which hmm, maybe means they bond them themselves.
What do you think? But I wanna highlight the point about the
whole tunnel discussion as they're talking about,
look at these tunnels we found
that means they're terror tunnels.
Don't forget, and this is a point I made earlier,
we just went over this in depth.
This is the National Geographic article
that talks about these interesting history.
Let me do this. So I'll have to scroll back down.
The point is, this was written
in 2000, what was it again?
2012 in National Geographics talking about the tunnels.
And their main point is these are just families, many
of them just people digging tunnels to be able
to be become a part of this lucrative smuggling operation.
It seems to operate in plain daylight, right in front
of Egypt, in front of Israel.
Nobody seems to stop it. Hmm?
I wonder what you think that means.
You have to understand that there's a level this
was allowed to happen.
Then the point that they highlight,
which was in this conversation, they simply say, look,
a handful of rockets are launched by young militants
who are hired by local merchants whose profits would be
declined if Israel's closure were further relaxed.
So Israel, who clear sorely who, I mean,
where do you think this stuff is coming from guys?
So these are merchants, in my opinion,
or even the Miltons themselves at a time when we know
Israel's funding Gaza, that is working
with this lucrative smuggling operation, making a lot
of millions of dollars, they said.
So they're allowing rockets to pop off,
which they go look a rocket, they're terrorists.
We have to keep fighting. Then they allow
the smuggling to continue.
And these, in many cases, if you read the article,
they're not sm they, they admit that weapons would be part
of this, which then you have to admit Israel's aware of.
But either way, that most of this is food, medicine,
toys, things that they're not able to get.
Why? Because the siege has always been there.
Not just post-OC October 7th.
So think about that when we just go to terrorism, you have
to understand how this is being played.
Now, on top of that, the building general strike,
Terrance Daniels makes a good point
and says, well, maybe you should stop blowing up under
buildings then , all the hostages
and Gaza were killed in indiscriminate bombing.
Those pictures of cities flattened.
Those are actually pictures of dead hostages.
Now that's his opinion. But I agree
and I think the point here is that yes, you can acknowledge
as we just covered that on May 22nd,
the IDF strikes a Hamas under school.
No, this is Twitter's reporting,
but here's times of Israel
airstrike targeted what they claim.
Were Hamas members at a unrest school.
And then we're supposed to swing back
around a few days later and go, look, they just,
they killed May 23rd.
Look, they found bodies in the building that we just bombed.
Isn't it not at least possible
that you a yes guys obviously.
And then we should stand even further back
and recognize what the United Nations has said about
what they have been bombing.
Now there's a lot of good information in this post,
by the way, this is just a general post, uh,
May 22nd from like all the different things they've been
bombing about around the un.
This is just about unre schools.
If you're, and un rebuildings,
if you haven't looked at this, 388 times,
have they bombed an unrepped premise,
388 times
where all the human shields are supposed to be told are happening there.
And the people inside
of them have been reported since the beginning
of the war 388.
Some with multiple incidents by the way,
including at least 54 incidences of military use and
or interference at un premises.
174 different UNRE installations have been impacted.
Unre estimates
that in total at least 450 internally displaced peoples
sheltering in their shelters have been killed.
450 random people that have just been sheltering there, many
of them children and women, most of them in fact.
And it says at least a further 1,472 injured
since the start of the October 7th war forward UN R is still
verifying the number of casualties caused
by these incidents, some of them in completely destroyed,
that have impacted its installations
and notes that these figures do not include some reported
casualties or the number
of injuries could be more determined,
determined, not be determined.
The point is, obviously these could have civilians in them.
Obviously these could have hostages in them.
I genuinely believe that either the squirrels, right,
that this was manufactured to dump this on them and
and act like this was, you know,
that they had recovered the body all the time ago
and they make, they kept it okay,
and they turned it back out or
however you justi how, explain why.
And oh, who knows, maybe the parents
are lying about the way she looks.
However you explain that statement, you can clearly see
that the bombing of the buildings they just said they bombed
right before they claim they found them in that building,
should be a little bit of a clue
that maybe they killed them themselves.
Maybe they meant to. And here's actual an example
on video on May 24th, even in Rafa of all places,
Israeli soldiers record themselves.
He posted this on the 24th, by the way.
So this was from before the 24th.
We very well could be watching the example of the school
that killed these hostages where they blow up a school in
the city and they all
laugh about it, post it on their TikTok, right?
Totally not a war crime.
And here is a UN doc, a UN post saying,
security council denounces attacks against aid
workers UN personnel.
And I think there was something I had in here,
but I'm gonna skip it now to end here in general,
we have the u, an ambassador addressing the pr, the press
and the UN on behalf of the Arab group
regarding the draft resolution that was just passed.
And the security council will a vote of 14 in favor.
Oh, that's what this was.
And regarding the protection of civilians in armed conflict.
So I found what I found interesting.
They pass a resolution 14 in favor, one abstention,
which we believe was Russia, which I find interesting,
but guess who voted for it?
The United States. So now you've got the United States in a
security council vote, voting to
denounce attacks on aid workers.
I'm sure they're not gonna say they mean Israel,
but who else is doing that right now?
So it's very interesting to see how sl,
how quickly they're losing support.
And I don't know, I don't really unders,
I don't understand why Russia would vote abstain.
There's usually a political reason for it may,
but of course you could argue it's
because they don't believe in supporting aid workers.
I don't think that's what it translates to,
but whatever you wanna believe, the point is,
it's abstain, not yes or no.
Usually for me, it, as I understand abstention,
that means some kind of objection to the overall framing
or the process itself.
That's why we should be able to abstain from voting
and our, that's, it's a real option
that they don't allow us,
but clamp us also continuing, you know,
the same post saying they found these bodies under the un
rebuilding, as if that's supposed
to justify bombing children in the un rebuilding.
This person just highlights an important reality
that Israel is now
and always has been holding more hostages than Hamas,
even though, and there are hostages in Gaza,
but most of them are detainees or POWs
because they are literally military targets,
including those four women that they showed.
But 3,424 on the record, which way more than that
of administrative, detain, detainees.
Administrative meaning they have not been charged,
that they're held and deathly in many cases.
The world is very clear about this.
Even Israel tacitly admit to this,
they're just throwing rocks with terrorists.
But yet we only look at one side
and remember 11 different times they've had the opportunity
to get these people back, including Shawnee, Luke
and whoever else would've been
there before they were killed.
And they didn't. And their people know this.
That's why their people are screaming
that they should take whatever they get right now,
and they're not rather just whatever deal was offered
that might bring their families home.
So everybody else is fighting against what they're doing.
And yet everybody else is a racist for doing so,
including all the people in their country.
And she goes, why does it never occur to RA to call
for the release of the hostages?
Same point from before. How embarrassing?
You mean aside from the fact
that every single entity has said yes, let go of,
or how about the deals that they're
acknowledging, which also do that?
Or all the times that you have refused
as Israel's government anyway, the deals
that would've gotten them back.
But no, let's pretend like un ra highlighting the bombing
of Rafa is unjust, is they should be calling for the hum.
I mean, think about acknowledging the, the killing
that just took place in Rafa and then trying to direct anger
and oh, why don't you call for the hostages to be released?
You mean the hostages that you probably
just killed in that area?
You see, these people have lost the plot.
Nobody, this doesn't make,
it didn't make sense in the first couple
of days, but people were scared.
Now it's just comically stupid.
And speaking of comically stupid, here's Elon Levy.
He says, Israel cannot abandon the hostages in temas terror
dungeons abandon them.
You mean aside from the fact that you've refused 11 deals
where they would've come back, he says,
this war Hamas declared on us is awful , oh,
to declare it, they declare a war on you,
or did you occupy them for 75 years?
And they finally resisted. It's just embarrassing.
He says, but the alternative
to fighting this barbaric foe is to abandon our citizens.
Same thing they keep doing.
So you mean the only two options are bomb
everybody to death or do nothing?
Are you really that inept?
You really, that completely
incapable of coming up with someone?
No, they don't care. They don't want any
of these people back because it
shows you what they really are.
And then of course he goes, people have been kidnapped,
raped, starved, tortured, executed.
Well, there's no evidence
of anything other than taken, raped.
The evidence has completely fallen apart. Starved.
Well, I should say that is true.
But then are you gonna pretend like
that's not because of your actions?
Okay, how embarrassing is that? Tortured?
I don't see any evidence of that.
In fact, the exact opposite certainly could be executed
where every single one that we can show
that they're claiming was executed like the Bibas family was
admitted to have been killed by IDFs.
They're desperate guys.
Lastly, the same point
after all that we discussed as they're screaming about
what they're doing here,
they are using human shields right in front
of everybody posting their own videos about it.
They truly believe that they're unaccountable some
of the people on the ground at the very least.
But I believe that illusion is rapidly losing
or rapidly diminishing.
So we're gonna leave it there. Quite a long one today, guys,
but I wanted to make sure I got all that out.
I, um, tomorrow my plan is to, uh, play my interview with,
uh, Sal the Aris, which is a really great interview,
but it wasn't necessarily time sensitive.
So I wanted to make sure that there was,
you know, a good place to play it.
I'm gonna make sure I play it tomorrow either way,
since it's been kind of a week now.
And I might be doing a show tomorrow as well,
but there's a lot more I have to get done.
But that's my plan. So I'll,
I'll be letting the wire community and,
and possibly Twitter know as well.
But thank you for, for tuning in guys.
I think it's just important
that we stay the course no matter the, the, the site, the,
you know, all the attacks, the suppression, the censorship.
'cause this is just important. And I think we all know that.
We all feel that. And I, for one, I'm okay
with whatever comes to pass
after this in regard to my own detriment, my, you know,
or the t lab entity in general,
because I'm okay with where we are right now.
And I, I believe I'm willing to sacrifice all this to be
okay with who I am for the rest of my life, knowing
that I've stood up for what I believe in,
at a time when very few in,
let's put it this way, I mean not,
I wouldn't say few in general,
but I was gonna say, I'm trying to think of the right word
for it, is in, in, in the media sphere, let's put it
that way, are willing to take the stand to come
after this in a way that's justified
to call this what it is.
Not to worry about being called racist
or being dis you know, regarded
as something that you're not.
But having the courage to fight it from day one.
I mean, there's people that are slowly coming around
to this guys as you know, what this platform,
whether it was Covid or anything else, I'll do
what I think is right at the time when it's the most
difficult, which is what I believe people
respect about this platform.
My point though is that I, I'm, you know, I'm right
with God in the context of where we are on this, that I'm,
I'm okay with losing everything if it means
standing up for what I believe in.
But I hope we don't do that.
I hope that we're able to fight
and I hope there is some justice in the world
where we'll be able to maintain, especially
because we were right about what's going
on, what we've built here.
We definitely need your support. I know you guys know that.
I hate having to bring it up.
The reality is that we, with the,
if you haven't seen the beginning of the show, the idea
that Stripe has now told us we're no longer allowed
to use their pro, their payment server
because they claim we're crowdfunding, even though
that's not what we're doing,
and they added that in in April last month when they
haven't updated this in years.
Seems a little targeted to me,
but I, I get the same sense this is gonna start
to be happening, start to happen to more
and more people using the platform just
to stop us from being able to use them to
fund what we're doing.
And as you guys have seen,
and many times I've tried other examples, other avenues,
it seems impossible.
So yet again, we fall back to
what we always knew would be the base here, the,
the the donation base system.
And it seems we may end up doing mail in only
as assuming they don't stop the mail from coming to us too.
So continue to support us in any way you can.
Please in the chat, if you could dump in the, the links to
what people can support us with.
It's down below every video we have
and now the give, send, go even.
But they, they seem to be blocking recurring donations.
I, I really don't know guys, but you know,
mail is something, if you wanna just give us words
of encouragement, it definitely need it today.
So thank you for being here. Thank you
for supporting this platform
or anybody else you believe is fighting for the truth.
I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.