- We have to condemn the atrocities that happen every day
to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
Uh, I was part of the human rights vetting process
for arms going to Israel
and a charity called Defensive Children International
Palestine, uh, drew our attention at the State Department
to the sexual assault, actually the rape
of a 13-year-old boy
that occurred in an Israeli prison in the
mosque bier in Jerusalem.
Uh, we examined these allegations.
Uh, we believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, uh, the government of Israel.
And do you know what happened The next day
the IDF went into the DCIP offices
and removed all their computers
and declared them a terrorist entity?
Um, I think it is vital that aroc not happen to anyone.
Not sexual atrocity, not sexual violations, not any kind
of gross violation of human rights.
We are looking at a situation where there is so much
de humanification where people are not seen.
- Welcome to the Daily Wrap Up.
A concise show dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours,
- Thursday, May 23rd, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
I think today's show is actually especially important,
not just because of what we seem
to have been doing consistently since October 7th, long
before, in fact, but highlighting the very egregious,
irresponsible and,
and far reaching lies that are being spun
by the Zionist organization,
the Israeli government, and those that support it.
And that's not clearly every Jew or every Israeli.
I think people are beginning to very, you know,
acutely recognize that right now.
But today in general, we're gonna talk about
some, a couple of follow up.
So I'm gonna, I'm gonna highlight, uh, towards the end,
the humanitarian aid conversation that we were able to get
to yesterday or the day before.
But as you guys are seeing today,
there's a lot spinning around.
And I think what we keep seeing,
and I've made this point many times, is the reactive nature
of the propaganda coming out of the Israeli government.
And it's, it's insultingly reactive
where information will be very clearly laid out,
and I mean, like factually shown, even covered
by corporate media in some cases, shockingly enough.
And then they'll react with some kind of a counter narrative
that is, you know what my point in saying this
and u usually is that that's not
how propaganda typically works.
It's not some clumsy, reactive, half-hearted, quick done,
you know, jump to the point thing to get, just
to get your narrative out there to try to,
you know, lessen the blow.
It's usually about trying to manufacture consent
and, you know, so what we're seeing is it really,
it really kinda shows you from the beginning
they were on their back foot.
And I think what we're gonna highlight today is, is one
of the most high level,
immediately self-evident examples of this.
Now, we saw a lot come out over the last couple of weeks.
We've seen the ICC investigation on top of the ICJ.
We've talked about, uh, I mean, any number
of shifting dynamics.
And one of the things that we're gonna talk about today,
which is a very big monumental shift, Norway, Spain,
and I'm off the top of my head, I'm all
of a sudden forgetting the third one.
We'll get to it in the, in the show
today, multiple western nations.
And I can already tell there's many right
behind them that are gonna be coming through.
At the same point are stating that they're moving forward to
recognize a Palestinian state.
And the reaction of the main two people who
of the last 30 years have screamed that
that's all they want is very telling.
The United States and Israel seem to act like
that's the most insulting thing you could ever say, just
because they argue what happened on October 7th.
But it's, the problem is they're not
calling for a Hamas state.
They're calling for a Palestinian state as if
that's supposed to reward the
entity that they're pointing to.
Of course, not even factoring in the reality
that we can prove that Israel has funded Hamas as e as e as
as recent as 2020.
I argue well past that, but we can prove that
as I'll show you yet again today, as the massage chief went
to Qatar to petition them to continue financial aid
for Hamas, that was their, for their statement from
her, uh, Harts.
The point being in all of this is that it's clumsy.
It doesn't make much sense
if you've been following the story.
And so all of this has caused them, I think,
even more than usual to be very uncertain about
where this is going, which is why my point is
about reactive propaganda.
We saw, we see all this stuff get
flooded into the conversation.
One of the points we're gonna highlight re the first segment
of today, outside of a couple of opening points,
is the discussion of those four IDF members, which is
what they were, who were in fact,
clearly not just reservists in the background
who were already active
and deployed, which in my opinion, that's a point
to be made reservist versus IDF.
And just because Israel makes sure everybody in their
society has
to go into the IDF does not then alleviate the reality
that if you're part of the military,
you're actually a military target in regard
to armed resistance protected under the,
for Geneva Convention International law.
As for an occupied territory,
which anybody pretending this is not an occupied territory,
is not an honest, not a serious person.
It's a very easily proven fact.
The point being that all of this shows
that these four IDF members who were taken
a video was shown about this,
and again, that that would make them detainees
or even PO ws, not necessarily hostages.
Now, these words, as far as even myself, have become kind
of synonymous because it's,
and really we shouldn't be, we should
be more specific and accurate.
That's why I use detainees today.
But the pe, the, the overwhelming amount,
which we'll talk about also of Palestinians mostly innocent,
which will clearly show today who are currently detained,
thousands of them in Israel just
don't really get much attention.
But it's not about one or the other, or that versus this.
It's if, if there's a crime being broken on either side,
it needs to be acknowledged.
And I can clearly show you a waterfall of crimes
that are being committed just since
October 7th from Israel's side.
Now also, there were crimes
and are crimes being committed by Hamas.
That's not a question as I'll show you one
of the elderly hostages they've taken or the children.
Those are crimes guys.
And we have to be very real about that.
It doesn't change the dynamic
of why they may argue that's justified.
And you may decide to say,
even though it's a crime, I get where they're coming.
That's, that's up for each individual to decide.
The point is, it's still technically a crime
and it has to be regarded as such to be an honest,
objective reporter.
But the problem is that those were four IDF members
who were taken and got spun up into.
They were kidnapped, and these were your daughters.
And, you know, which sure, these are people's daughters,
and that definitely is a sad story.
But the law matters. And
as we're gonna talk about this today, the Israeli government
put out, really, it came from,
I can't tell if this came out from one of the propagandists
around all of this, but either way,
Israel then supported the claim that this is a new story.
Even though that video has already been put out.
We've seen this going back a long way.
There's new angles of that video, which seem to suggest
or prove that Israel's weirdly holding back certain levels
of their story, which doesn't really make much
sense other than propaganda.
But then they went as far as to say
that they were saying things that they provably did not say.
The Hamas members in the video
and Israel's main account on Twitter,
and many of their, uh,
official people stated this lie repeated, this lie as far
as the New York Post in the headline saying the thing
that they 100% did not say.
And I've checked this up, down, left right with Robert,
plenty of people that, multiple people
that speak Arabic outside of my circle.
I mean, this is easily proven.
And so why did they lie about it? Did they not know?
Did they not care? I think it's obvious that it's one either
that they just don't care about if it's true or not.
It's more about the narrative and the propaganda,
or that they knowingly knew it was a lie
and pushed it anyway for the same reason.
They've already deleted the tweet and we'll get to this.
But how incredible is that?
And lying about all the information
and then even further seeing the people
around the conversation pushed the aggressive narrative
that these are innocent people.
Well, innocent, it was the wrong word for this context,
because because somebody's a military person does not
therefore make them not innocent,
but saving civilians that they are civilians.
And they were not military challenging people on that point.
And as I went through my due diligence as we always do,
I found out that the articles
that I used in the picture today,
and I'll show you who I did that little screenshot, I want
to give them credit for breaking it down high com, uh,
commenting on this underneath somebody lying about it,
that they've changed those articles.
The Times of Israel has edited all four of those articles,
and I'll prove it to you with the archives.
And even the URLs that still clumsily say the thing
that they say isn't real, that they were taken from bases,
that they were soldiers, that they were active.
And so now we see the times of Israel,
the Israeli government, most of the people supporting them
involved in a knowing lie or so clumsy about it,
or so dishonest that they don't even care if it's a lie.
And yet it's permeated through most of the conversation.
I argue it's not working. I think they've already lost
to such degree that this is just more clumsy propaganda,
but it's still kind of shocking to see
that the people in power don't seem to care
or don't know any better, which is really unnerving
because just because these people are dishonest
or illegitimate or even compromised does not mean they don't
have power against people like us.
And that's what really unnerves me about this,
is they don't seem to be shaken by this.
Well, now we're gonna talk about, as I said,
the different countries that are now recognizing
or beginning or about to recognize Palestine.
We're gonna talk about the ICC, the follow up on
that conversation, the reactions of Israel humanitarian aid,
how it is still being lied about right to this point.
It's just unreal. And then it,
and most likely, I assume we'll have time
to the campus protest part at the end
that I've been really wanting to talk about the points.
Most of these have been made.
I mean, and, and, and I stand by what I've said before
and the facts around it.
This is just kind of some more tangential points to continue
to prove what I've been saying and others as well.
But it's still important that we follow up
so you can see the new information.
Now on that note, let's start with, uh, some a po uh,
in recent post, the, yesterday we put out on our substack,
Taylor wrote this,
and this is an amazing follow up to her honor,
a Burkhart video, which the one year anniversary will be
coming up on the 30th, I believe.
And I reached out, I don't know if
Taylor has anything scheduled.
I should have brought it up with her before today,
but I asked her if she wanted
to do something on the 30th about
this, and I wanted to hear back.
But either way, I think her
and I will probably do some kind
of a re you know, remembrance or follow up.
And, you know, I may maybe we'll talk about
the conversation of his death.
We'll see if we get to that. It's,
it's not really about whether we're willing to,
it's about the sensitivity of the, the, the story
and the family and so on.
But, you know, the, the point I've made,
my my thoughts clear, I don't think there's,
I think there's something very strange
about how that went down.
She knows a lot more about it than I do.
Maybe we'll flesh that out on the conversation.
But she's been really doing amazing
work following up on this.
I mean, I mean, and by the way, the, the substack,
and by, oh, I'm gonna say this right now
before I forget, I'm gonna be planning for the 30th.
I'm trying to get all this kind of squared away on the side,
but for the 30th, for, um, probably early in the day
for our foundry founding meeting for the Substack.
So if you're subscribing
and you wanna be a founding member, this is
where the perk will come in.
I mean, really, as always, supporting T Lab is
really not about getting perks.
It's about if you believe in the work
and the value that we put out
by everything that we do for free.
And that's another way to support us.
But nonetheless, the point is
that there is a founding meeting that we're supposed
to be doing every month, which we wrote down, which I,
I've been, you know, because of the kind of quick transition
between who was running the Substack
before, I haven't been, had time to get it going,
but we, I'm gonna be aiming for the 30th to do that.
So if you wanna sign up now, you'll be a part of that.
We'll do a q and a about an hour.
We could talk about different things
where I'll be there personally.
But she's been doing some amazing work following up on this.
And this is the recent one. We put out rapid aging, scarring
of the arteries, a side effect of covid injections, a lot
of the stuff that a lot of people have
broken down talked about.
But the best part about this is it's not just a hype,
you know, conversation about what we've seen discussed.
These are coming directly from the late Arna Burkhart's
own personal investigations.
You know, like not, not just reviewing scientific
literature, his own in, in the, the lab
investigations in a micro,
with a microscope about what he's saying.
Like this is, you know, actual autopsies, actual samples.
And he's pro he proved all this stuff.
Of course, nobody wanted to hear it,
at least within the mainstream.
So she's doing great work. Breaking this down.
The video is a clip from the full interview,
which I highly recommend you watch as I understand it.
Um, I think it was, I dunno if she said 21st century wire
or I, I forget who she, I wanted somebody in
that circle was gonna be playing this coming up in the 30th.
So thank you for that. And this, this interview needs to get
as much reach as possible.
Now, on the note of that conversation,
I thought there was a couple points I wanted to add
that I thought were really unnerving.
So this is something that was recently shared with me from,
uh, I think it was from Orwell Vivo Smart Chain.
Use your heartbeat to mind crypto.
Hey, what could go wrong there?
Now what's alarming about this is that it's just this,
every angle it seems they're trying to tokenize,
monetize your health, your own personal bio, you know,
uh, uh, biological processes.
And at first it may just seem like, why not?
I get a little benefit here and there.
But of course, you know where this ultimately goes.
If this becomes a point where, I mean, overall,
there's a thought of different corrections that could go in.
How this gonna end up turning and becoming something you're
forced to do or you need to do,
or these become social credit overlapped tokens needed
for other thing that sounds so crazy to people
that don't really understand
that this is a real time reality.
Look at China, it's all happening already.
I just think we need to be worried about how they're trying
to push people into this that don't really understand
how bad this can go.
And here's an example of what we were already talking about.
This is written by Derek from 2023, Sam Altman,
artificial Intelligence, the Bilderberg
Group and World Coin.
Remember, this was the world coin thing
where they literally were telling they had
to look into this orb,
scan their irises physically this was going
around the country, and then they would get free
cryptocurrency just exchanging things
that we don't even fully understand what they mean.
Yet, for most people, I mean, even for all of us,
I would argue like we know what your IRA scan is,
but what does that mean 30, 50, a hundred years from now?
Like, what does that really mean?
Well, in the context of our lifespan 20 years from now,
what is that gonna mean in 20 years?
Is that valuable? Is it gonna be something
that it can use against you?
It's, this is alarming.
These are biometric data that we should be concerned about.
And we're all, a lot
of people in the paradigm are leaning into facial scans
and IRIS scans and fingerprints,
all the stuff at the border and the smart wall.
It's all where it's going, guys, we just, just stand up
and call it out if you see it,
because this is rapidly escalating
and the two party illusion seems
to be lost in it to a degree.
But again, I genuinely think that people within
that are increasingly shrinking minority.
Maybe I'm optimistic there. The one place in the world.
I'm optim optimistic. But here's
another point I wanted to highlight.
Two things. You know, as I pull my shoulder,
pat myself on the back, I think it's important
to demonstrate our value to show
that this is something we've talked about a long time ago.
Censored, man rightly points this out.
It's an important story X now
requires, there's two things in this.
By the way, X now requires Twitter now
requires identification.
ID for monetization. Well, who didn't see that one coming?
A lot of us were screaming that, right?
The point being that eventually you're gonna get set up
where you're making all this money,
or at least the ones that are allowed
to within this completely controlled ecosystem.
And then all of a sudden, hey, now we need your IRIS scans,
or you're gonna lose the way too much money we're dumping on
you for artificial reasons.
That's what's gonna, that's what's already happening.
And most of those people have probably quietly already done.
So, even if they're outwardly screaming about
how this is a technocratic problem,
not Twitter, but everywhere else.
And then, oh, here, I'll hand over my Iris scans
because Elon's the good one.
That's why that's already happening.
And, and not to suggest that Iris scans are part of that,
but we're talking about digital ID overlap, right?
And it says, every creator
and everyone who aspires to be, uh, uh, uh,
monetized on Twitter must oppose
this a hundred percent agree.
He says, if you don't like
or if you don't, there a good chance your ID will end up in
the hands of Israeli intelligence.
What? Well, yeah, remember where this story goes.
The company that Twitter uses
to verify your identification is an Israeli company founded
by members of Israeli Intelligence, chin Bet and Unit 8,200.
The same kind of overlap of intelligence in this tech world
that Whitney has been screaming about for a long time,
that her and I have had lots
of conversations about the company responsible
for verifying people's IDs on Twitter is cold.
And I forget if it was pronounced differently.
I've said auto ticks in the past.
It's spelled with an A one instead
of an I in the first part, or a set of a TI mean, excuse me.
So it's A-U-I-O-T-I-X, the CEO of that company.
Ron Ottman was a member
of Israeli's Israeli Intelligence Unit 8,200.
His father was once the treasurer of the Laco Party.
That's Netanyahu's party.
For those that don't know, it also has a history
of helping the Israeli military with military surveillance
and intelligence gathering, which if you think that applies
to only Gaza
or war time, whatever that would mean, Zionists seem
to think everything's always war
time the way they present this.
So I guarantee it has to do
with whatever they're involved with.
And they've made so many statements acknowledging,
I mean like the, even the ones
that are supposedly no longer active, I 80 unit,
8,200 members, how many statements they've made
that their actions continue to be in the interest
of Israel no matter where they are in the world.
That's, that's alarming.
That's the same point we're making
about APAC and all the rest.
And if any other country was doing it
and stating it like that, it would be a problem.
But Israel were erased.
If you pointed out, even though we're talking about a
government now, it says it doesn't stop there.
However, auto Six has founded, was founded in 2002
as the technological arm
of a Dutch firm called ICTS International.
IT CTS International was established in 1982, also
by former members of Israeli Intelligence Unit Shin Bet,
sort of like the FBI in Israel.
This is an extreme security risk. A hundred percent agree.
He says, not only will regular creators have
to give their ID to a company with deep ties
to Israeli intelligence,
but pro-Palestinian creators will also have to do the same.
Now, that's a huge point.
These are people that are being targeted
around the world by these entities.
This is completely and totally unacceptable.
He says, and here's the part that I have a problem.
Well, I mean, why not?
I just, I I'm not gonna suggest that I know
what Cedric Mann's mind is.
Maybe he's doing this to make a point.
But he says, Elon, you have the power
to prevent this from happening.
Well, he also is the reason it's happening, guys.
And I think that's what we have to understand.
This is not some binary, like he's, it's just like,
ha he's just twiddling his thumbs over here
where all the bad people, he's in charge of this Now,
whether he's in charge of every decision,
he's still the one who's in charge
and he's still allowed ya, carino and the different overlaps
or not removing things that we now know are still there.
We, the people that bought into this were played guys.
And whether it's Twitter files
or what this is really about, like he's some partisan hero.
We gotta wake up to it. And I think most have.
But he goes, I know I speak on behalf of a lot
of creators when I say, do, don't go ahead with this.
Well, it's already happening.
And I talked, my point was, TLAB tried to draw attention
to this in December of 2023,
but of course it was suppressed on this
platform, which it very clearly was.
And the supposedly independent partisan media boxed it out.
This should have been a gigantic story.
And those of us that talked about it
didn't get much attention for it.
Why? Because it was talking about Twitter and
because the left at that time
wasn't really gonna talk about this.
The right would've been the one to be like, that's huge.
If it was anybody but Elon on Twitter,
it would've been a big story.
But nope, it got denied, got ignored.
And the Israel overlap as usual.
Had people been watching The Daily Wrapup,
they would've known about this as well
as many other platforms that did talk about it.
Think that's important. And here's the article itself,
which we included lastly, the record for, for, uh,
from Recorded Future News says, mem highlights that members
of the House Armed Services Committee,
and this is from the article down here, you can read
for yourself, are prepared to push a bipartisan, bipartisan,
that's always a dangerous thing in this country.
'cause what, you know, usually, like I said
before I made, I tweeted this out recently that, uh,
I forget it was maybe Lindsey Graham made a point about
something and I highlighted it saying, well, you know,
the only time you see bipartisan support is for wars
and Israel, and usually the US is in war because of Israel.
And I think that's an important point.
But they're now pushing a bipartisan proposal
that would require the Pentagon
to study establishing a military cyber service.
Gee, I wonder what that's about.
Now, it's not just about Israel,
it's about challenging their narratives from the broader
point, but clearly they are losing everything.
I mean, I was just on Sputnik this morning talking about the
plummeting Biden numbers, which I always laugh about.
I dunno why they always want me to talk about things
that I actively and I did this morning
too, do not think are genuine.
I say it every time they bring me on about voting stuff.
I say, well, let's first establish
that voting doesn't actually translate
to the out translate to the outcome.
I just think it's funny. I maybe they like that I do that,
but they bring me on all the time
and I enjoy talking to them.
But I made the same point that I think polls are ridiculous.
They're constantly lied to us about,
but overall, we can see
that people are losing the Biden administration
left right paradigm.
It's all an Israeli Israeli government.
They're plummeting in their control, their influence
because of what's happening.
And a military cyber service is probably just gonna be a be
a Pentagon arm of censorship
and a lot more
terrifying things that would come along with that.
But I thought it was important that
we highlight those to start.
Now, let's start, as I said, with the really,
really unnerving propaganda, which is really
what this is based on a real, a story that is real, uh,
that these four women were taken.
But it's important to understand the bigger picture here
again, that they were all IDF members
who in fact had already been deployed after October 7th.
And we'll have, we can show you the video.
And that they lied about
what these people were saying in order to push the idea
that they were sexually abused, that they were raped.
That's what this is really about.
And we're also gonna show you as we get
to it in the next segment
that even, oh, that's the wrong one.
Even the Associated Press has now come out,
and this is as of the 22nd
and acknowledged that the eight, they've examined
how two different major
and pretty much the two central claims about rape happening
October 7th were debunked.
Which by the way, you already know
that anybody even remotely paying attention has known
that even Har Rats broke this down.
But the fact that it's gotten associated press, it's,
it's just shows you that they're pushing
this lie based on nothing.
And that's why they have to lie so egregiously.
Now, that's, again, not to say
that there were no crimes committed.
Now, it's important to be respectful about this,
and it's not about siding with Palestine versus Israel.
It's about being a human being, right?
You can even show respect
and show decorum with your enemies.
But the facts are still important.
It's not about, you know, the idea that we're in some part
of society right now, usually from the paradigm we're
getting pushed to be small and petty.
And, you know, it's, it's the wrong direction.
You can show the facts and call people out in the harshest
ways while still showing respect, not just for them,
but just for people around you.
And it's, IM, I think it's important
that we hold a higher standard than the people
that are pushing us into these things.
So my point is that these are people's family, right?
You realize that these are women that have families,
that have mothers and fathers
and some probably children, I don't know.
But the point is that to recognize that
and act accordingly, okay?
So my point is that they sh they look bloody.
And I'm gonna show the whole video they showed just
for in case somebody might argue that we're trying
to hide something, they're bloodied up on their faces.
Okay? So what's the first point I wanna make
before we even get into this is we don't know exactly
what happened, right?
That's important just because they show blood on this video.
We don't, you know, it's most likely, obviously
because of the way they were taken.
That's an obvious assumption, but it's still an assumption.
The point is then if they were beat up, you could argue
and not argue that would be a crime, right?
I mean, even, even though they're POWs or detainees
because they were IDF members, there's still a level
of decorum that's supposed to be shown a legal reality
that they're not supposed to be tortured,
they're not supposed to be beat up, right?
So if we're gonna be objective, you can say, okay,
well there's a crime right there.
But the important thing is for context is to stand back
and say, okay, if you're going to be
that specific about this and argue that
that's the only thing that we're rather, you know, one
of the things that matters, are we gonna pretend
that we don't recognize that
that happens under every US war, every Israeli war,
every UK war, that they literally openly commit crimes?
I mean, go back to times of Churchill
and listen to the things he was saying about
what they would do and what they should do.
It's obvious that it's a standard that's set in order
to set the appearance right?
But it doesn't mean we should ignore it.
The law still exists and pe seemingly more
so in our minds than even the government today.
But I'm only saying that. So
it's important that we're objective.
I'm not saying in any sense that it's okay
that crimes were committed
or that they, anything
that was against the law was take was done.
But it's important to say that the taking of them in
that act was a legal act by the armed resistance
of the milit, the armed resistance of, of Gaza,
because they were IDF members.
And if you ignore all of those things,
even if it makes you uncomfortable or unhappy
or angry, you're being dishonest
because an occupied territory has the legal right
to arm resistance under the fortune of a convention.
That is international law.
I've said many times, Gaza Hamas did commit crimes,
but that doesn't then invalidate the legal reality
of the armed resistance and the act they're in.
It means those people that commit crimes
and they have to be charged for 'em,
or you can charge the entire group.
It still does not remove the reality
of the legal understanding of armed resistance.
And so then when that military force took other military
forces, just like in any other war dynamic,
that becomes a POW, not a hostage, it's not illegal.
If they were to beat them up, rape them,
steal from, those are crimes.
I know this just infuriates the people trying
to shove this down our throats to be only one way.
This is what actual objectivity looks like.
And of course, I could still be wrong.
Question it all for yourselves. That's very important.
So arson Troskey, one of the cl you know, a a a self, a,
a claim to be an international human rights lawyer.
I don't know how he could possibly make
that statement while making the comments
that he constantly makes,
but he says, sickening new video footage.
This was 10:00 AM today, yesterday,
released a four young terrified Israeli women, you know,
of course leaving out their, their active IDF members beaten
by Hamas cowards
and taking captive de Gaza, you know,
under legal actions of international law.
But, you know, the international human rights lawyer doesn't
seem to understand that, or doesn't care to point that out.
He says, I wonder, do the leaders of Norway, Spain,
and Ireland have daughters?
And we'll get to that point of it.
They're all really trying to push this idea that they,
anybody supporting Palestine is somehow endorsing this.
I mean, this is the clumsy, this is,
this is like calling them Nazi Hamas.
This doesn't, it's all about screaming a shocking idea
that scares people away from even looking at it,
even though it makes no sense whatsoever.
Not ideology, not ideologically, not,
not even factually, right?
So the point is that Spain, Norway and uh,
and, uh, Ireland clearly are stating,
and as they ought, most of them,
Ireland in particular have been saying for a long time,
Palestine deserves a state, right?
Interestingly, just like is Israel pretended they want
and just like the, the US pretends they want to.
So now, because they keep saying that, they say
that this is somehow wrong
because Hamas did something, you know, the group
that Israel funds and made sure they'd be in power.
It's just a game, guys.
The reality is that Palestinians, as they want you to think,
or they want you to think that they think are not the same
as Hamas, even going back to the election,
they love to throw in your face.
That was a plurality. It was only 46% of them
that actually supported Hamas.
So right there, you can see
that even the majority does not support Hamas,
at least from that election forward.
So to pretend that they're all Hamas, they're all guilty,
is a way to pretend that they're all worthy of being killed.
And those are the same people telling you
that we're supposed to think that they're fighting
only against the bad guys.
Well, in their minds, they're all bad guys.
It's not a hard thing to see.
So let's play this full video's three minutes long.
Now, again, this, there's some of this that is hard to see,
especially with the way that it's being framed.
I want you to recognize that there's cuts
weird black cuts like every 10 seconds.
So that means so, and even when people have reshared this,
that they seem to have cut other things out,
it goes down from three 14 to three 10 to 3 0 9.
This is constantly what happens.
Now, if they wanted you to see what happened,
they would give you the full, the full
breakdown, the full video.
So you could see all the context.
I'm convinced because they've lied about the subtitles.
So I mean, I honestly, from what I hear, they've li most of
what they say down there is either lied about, altered,
manipulated, or flat out untrue.
And the main point we'll get to is the claim
of those are the, I'll show you next.
They say that those are the women that can get pregnant.
That's the argument they make, that they said in this video.
My point is that just take with a grain of salt,
anything you're seeing here, the way that it's framed,
the way that they stated it.
But the reality is that these women were taken
and that they were taken by Hamas.
That's the thing you can prove here.
The other narratives and screaming
and different things, I just, I don't know,
I think we should question it
now again for IDF members.
Now see, clearly she's bloody, her face is bloody.
So I mean, as it'll come back to her,
I don't know why this is all suddenly low lowered
resolution for crying out loud.
Yeah, it says seven 20, man Twitter, I'm telling you, oh,
you know, I'll play this for you next guys.
Twitter, I actually right
after this, it's crazy how throttled we're,
we're getting on this about everything Twitter, I mean I've,
again, every time now
before my show, all of Twitter crashes,
not the browser only Twitter,
which then I'll show you what happened.
It removed something that I had saved.
But in any case, this is just
throttle for some reason it's all low.
But I'm sorry about that. So if their faces are bloody
and it was them, I, you know, argue that
that is a violation of a crime.
I shouldn't say if their faces,
and there was a blackout right there.
I shouldn't say, I shouldn't say if their faces are clearly
bloody, both the two of them there.
And she says, I have friends in Palestine,
, why?
See, what, is that what we, it's very strange
to me now also realize that this came from a Hamas filming.
Doesn't that seem strange to you?
What did they deliver it to to Israel?
I mean, you could argue this might have been posted
publicly somewhere, right?
But this is then why is it only just now coming out?
It's very strange to me.
I'm still convinced that there's some kind
of an alarming overlap
or at least infiltration if you wanna look at it that way.
If you think Hamas has changed so much to be no longer,
at least under the control of the Israeli government,
although they're cutter Qatari leaders
that are sitting rather leaders sitting in Qatar
that I've just proved the other day that the other lied,
they're claiming that they're not like protecting these
entities and they're on the record
saying they won't go after them.
And Qatar, it, it it,
the promise they have, that was their word.
The promise that they won't go
after them seems very strange to me.
Any case, my point is how does it make sense?
This video would be not put out till now.
I dunno, find it odd.
So like there, we will shoot you all.
I mean, certainly could have said
that it wouldn't be a crime to say that, but I don't know.
I don't, the only one that I've met a hundred percent proven
is not what they said is the one I'll show you in a second.
I think I, if you want my opinion, I think
what he's doing right there is saying, oh,
you got friends in Gaza, call them
calling your bluff, essentially.
That's my guess. I don't know.
But that's the important parts coming up, right?
And so the people that are saying like, you know what,
if these were your daughters, I mean, it's,
it's not an unfair statement.
It still matters, but it's not really fact.
It doesn't matter to the, the, the, the, the context
of the legality, right?
Just because these are people's daughters does not mean
that they're not legal targets
for an arm resistance under the Fortune Geneva Convention
as members of the IDF.
But if they're beat up, then you could argue that.
But I've kind, it's not hard to point to the other side
of this and argue that they've openly been caught more times
than I can even catalog right now.
Murdering in cold blood people, civilians, women,
pregnant women, you know, right now in
Gaza and going back 75 years.
But that wouldn't then make this okay, either,
just important to be objective.
I just don't get all the cuts
that seems, it's not just freezing.
Those are cuts. Those are weird cuts.
They're, they were there
praying, okay, right there.
Sorry for the Twitter thing, it's getting in the way.
But it says, here are the girls, women
who can get pregnant verifiably.
Not what he said. In fact, we'll show you the world,
the word basically translates to,
I'll wait till I'll show you what it says,
but that's provably across the board.
Right underneath this you'll see thou a hundred, I mean,
just goes as far back as you can look.
People once you get down to it saying that that's not
what they actually said, debunk toss, not what they said.
When you re-watch it for yourself.
This is the video we'll play in a second.
Actually, that's a better, that's more of a clear one.
Hold on, lemme grab that.
Oops, I forgot I was on this. Here we go.
Yeah. And he also says, these are Zionists. And
now it cuts to this.
Now this is interesting. I I I can't, I I I would,
I'm willing to believe that most
of this is out there somewhere.
My point is, first of all, this is not new.
Not in any sense other than just different angles
of the same information
that's been out since the very beginning.
Then it's nonetheless being framed
as some breaking new story even by the New York Post.
Even by a lot of corporate media, even by a lot
of people in the
political establishment in the United States.
'cause they're just going along opportunists
or they don't even care, not smart enough to know.
But this seems to be another shot come before the Jeep
and the people that go into it.
So I find interesting because this, the argument would be,
first of all, I think this proves the point
that I always remember who made that point.
I don't know if it was the squirrel or somebody else,
but the argument being that the woman they keep, the one
with the gray sweatpants that they constantly highlight is
the proof that people were raped.
Which it seems indicative of some kind of an abuse.
But that's never been proven that she,
that you can see her getting in the van, the truck in the,
or the Jeep in this case, in the other video,
you see her getting out and it's easy to see
that her bloody ankle was,
she was sitting right on her ankle.
And that's why when she gets out,
you see no blood in the front, which doesn't make much sense
to me if the argument is she was raped
and that's why she's bleeding right there.
But you can see it all in the back
because she was sitting on her bloody ankle.
Now that doesn't prove that she wasn't,
but at the very least it seems very clear that
that blood came from that exact circumstance.
And that's very easy to see.
This shows you another side of this,
which I think really does kind of put a, put that
to breast, okay?
Right there, you do not see the same blood.
That's not the same way it looks compared to the other one.
You just see the dirt on the back of her pants.
There you go. So it doesn't prove,
'cause that wouldn't be an objective thing to say that maybe
that wasn't also the case, but it does show you
that the blood they keep pointing
to came from her ankle that was bloody.
Now this is stuff you've generally seen,
like see all the clips.
That's so weird. Not sure who that was.
Know they're stepping on something hurts her foot,
you know, and so stuff like that that people, rightly so,
you know, especially if you don't know all the other bigger
discussions around this
and the lies that have been spun
that are upsetting people, right?
Because she's clearly in pain and that should matter.
She's a human being. But it,
the re the question is about whether
or not the larger crimes are being committed.
And I think that's very clear
and only really just showing all of it.
Because I want people to see the whole thing
that they played because you,
you don't really get much more, you just show them
bringing 'em out, putting 'em in the Jeep.
And I also don't know for sure what where the, the, like,
I'm trying, I'm trying to think about, so the
timing was before the video.
It's really cut. But you see that one girl got out,
so I guess the argument would be
before they took them to different
places that might be relevant.
Yeah, they're inside. That's it.
Very choppy, edited, highly edited. Okay.
Op made all the points I think are very clear
that we should care about people, human beings,
whether crimes are committed.
So let's get into the things they were spreading only here.
This, this goes with another point in a second.
So here's what he also shared showing you
what the New York Post shared.
This is what the New York Post put out one of them.
Anyway, savages shocking video shows Hamas terrorists
plotting rape of Israelis.
Why? Because they blindly took the false
statement that they claim.
They were saying those are the ones that can't,
can't get pregnant.
That's why it's a lie.
So there, New York Post should be immediately called out
for being the opposite of journalists,
for being the absolute blind followers
of an Israeli government propaganda campaign,
which is not surprising and it's not a new video.
This has been out, right? We've seen this already.
So they're just responding to what they're handed.
And that's pretty disgusting as well as to again,
highlight the video that I don't play again for you.
But you can look here that both the ex leader of Shin Bet
and the former Prime Minister here admit
that they've funded Hamas, that they sent billions
and it was $1.5 billion in suitcases full of cash, right?
And as well as the Maad chief going to Cutter
to ask Hama them to cutter specifically
to continue financial aid to Hamas.
This was as early late as this was 2020.
It's not hard to recognize this.
So that means that they are responsible
for what this group did.
If you even, especially if you think
they did everything they claim.
Now, here's one of the people
that is constantly spreading fake information.
He's an award-winning investigative journalist, fighting
for the truth as he lies every single time he posts about
Israel, Hamas, murderers
and rapists still pushing
that even though it's been debunked by now.
Even the Associated Press with Israeli girls taken from
Nahal, uh, Nahal Oz base, right?
A military base on October 7th.
These are the girls who can, who can get pregnant.
That's what he's again, citing the lie. Absolutely not.
What actually got said here is
what Israel did sharing the same thing.
And this is on the archive, so it's all, it's gone now.
They deleted it. Why do you think that is?
Because they got caught and it's wrong.
But here is the official account of Israel.
My point was, oh, I forgot to play those things.
I'll play right now. I,
I had this still up on my, on my browser.
I had the actual one up before they deleted it.
I was like, oh, perfect. I'm gonna show you the real tweet
just in case somebody wants to argue
that we made this up or it's not real.
But then the whole thing crashed,
which I think is very frustrating.
But here, uh, I think it's right here is the,
the actual, I took a video of the actual heavy, oh, sorry,
I was doing that while I was getting ready
for this Sputnik this morning, just showing you,
there's the actual art, the actual shot of the, of the tweet
as you can see for yourselves,
official rule count, not some parody.
And it says here, these are the girls who can get pregnant.
That was not what they said.
And I'll prove that to you next. Just wanna make sure we
recognize how ridiculous it is.
And then here was my entire, just all, all I had,
I was getting ready and I, I felt it coming.
All of a sudden the tweets weren't coming up.
This just white
and then you'll see it, the whole only tweets crash
and the whole, the browser stayed up.
Every other tweet, every other tab stayed up.
But boom, just like that, every one of them, which is,
which actually lost me a bunch of information.
Maybe that's what it's about. Just find
that very strange, don't you?
Very telling. Lemme delete these real quick.
Alright, so back to this.
Here's what they did, tweet here.
This is a foot video footage depicting the horrific
kidnapping of five female Israeli hostages.
They're their names. We'll show you again in a second.
They have been held hostage
by Hamas terrorists for more than 230 days.
Think of what that means for these young women
ignoring the reality that their IDF members
and lying about what they actually said again deleted.
And then here was yo Jonni Tara calling them out.
And again, you can see that it's gone.
Which weird doesn't say deleted. It is unavailable.
Isn't that strange? And I DoubleCheck
to make sure they weren't just blocking me.
They didn't. It is gone.
And it says, how desperate are you guys?
He says, you are stooping so low as
to sexualize your own female soldiers
and using them as propaganda material.
He says the phrase Get pregnant is fabricated by the author.
He says, here are captured women using the Arabic word Aya,
the plural form of sabia, which means captured women.
These are not civilians like other hostages.
They're active on-duty.
Soldiers captured from military base called the Hall Oz,
military observation posts.
Which by the way, even David said maybe by accident,
I don't know, but that's crazy.
And this, I'm not, again, I'm not just saying this
because Giannis Tara said it, I've proven it.
I'm just ba showing you what other people
that I respect are saying.
And he says, Hamas men said quote, those are the ones
who have been killing our brothers, referring
to an extrajudicial kill, extrajudicial killing
during the march of return.
The trans, the translation claims, these are Zionists,
but he actually said, here are the cowards.
So what's interesting is, what that tells me is that they're
trying to push the claim of, you know, they want you
to conflate Zionism and Judaism, Zionism
and whatever else they want you to think is bad.
Calling them Zionists would actually
be, I think, the right thing to do.
But the point is that that's
what they made it into for a reason.
But it says Israel, edit the video adding noise.
And this is what I was saying before
to obscure the original video.
What was audible was no beautiful, was ma was mistranslated
as you are so beautiful to imply,
Hamas was contemplating the female soldiers.
Another mistranslation occurred when Hamas man said Tle,
which means get her up into the vehicle.
The perverted author said, without her,
they're lying about every single thing
and they know they're doing this guys.
And then propaganda and co highlighted
the same thing, which is still deleted.
Said, you are such liars.
Now this is Moham Shida simply saying,
no one utters the word get pregnant in the entire video.
He says, here are the female captives the same thing.
And he says all five,
were IDF soldiers at the same military base here?
Of course. 'cause you can't, you can't expect some lie to go
around without the ridiculous Mikey Rappaport
lying about it with everybody else.
That's what he does. He just straight up highlights the
thing that wasn't said anywhere in there.
Now does he know, does he care?
Doesn't even matter, does it?
This person is a ridiculous person in general,
but as I said, of course, you blindly share
what you're handed with zero due diligence all
to maintain a genocide you'd
think you'd have learned by now.
Then again, you're, if you're paid to do this,
if you're paid to do this, you likely don't care.
That just makes you a real POS Here's a video you can watch
for yourself, which by the way, searing girl
and a lot of others have tagged the community notes
and it's self-evident.
It's actually easy to prove. You can hear the word he says.
You can look it up for yourself.
You can realize that it says young girl or a girl in cap,
and the plural woman is captured by a war enemy.
That's what the actual definition is.
Everyone tagging c community notes
and weird how nobody's done.
You know why? Because even when people like Syrian girl
who are part of that community, she's shown up
before how she works with the community notes,
just get overrun by Zionists who are part
of it too that shout it down.
That's how it's supposed to work. Some kind of, you know,
democracy concept.
It's, that's mob rule. So it's not working in any case.
Here is the actual translation in that you can listen to it.
Here's the actual word. It's not hard to recognize guys,
it's self-evident and it's around everybody
with any standing is now calling this out.
But of course Michael lies about it.
And here's another clip showing you, uh,
basically if you watch this video
that everybody shares this, that's
what they're saying in here that, you know, just
how it just floods the algorithm on Twitter.
Look, arson Da David one
after another with almost the identical
statements using the same video.
There's daily mail, they're lying.
The girls who can get pregnant are,
are none of them checking this.
They must have somebody who can translate this for them.
Think about how wild that is.
It's just like the other point we made
before about the corporate media taking whatever lie
that they were given, it spins
through the entire corporate media
and they don't even check this stuff.
Or there is some kind of controlling entity at the top
of these organizations that don't care,
or all of them, I don't know.
But it's a little unnerving to see across the board
journalists who scream about fake news,
just blindly sharing something we can prove
is fake and it goes on forever.
I mean, it's just everybody, guys. It's crazy.
All the ones you'd expect as well.
Now, oh, and this, I guess it was over here
more, um, right here.
It was just 'cause this one's a better video.
You can see them. The point is, first of all, again,
like again, shocking, shockingly enough.
CNN called it, right?
And I, and then no way does
that mean we should start thinking
CNN is on your side or drive.
The point is that there's opportunists
and we can see the media very clearly, like a lot
of politicians going with the flow, the majority,
they can recognize that people are seeing this.
They recognize that it's in their interest
to start calling the truth.
That's what I think either way.
Families release Hamas abduction video
of seven female Israeli troops.
Troops, which destroys their whole narrative, doesn't it?
And this person, my point before, from
before says, dear CNN, you are trash, which I agree with,
but says and vile and disgusting.
You can't even report the simple news troops.
He says, you are either sick or mentally ill,
or both you morons.
These were innocent civilians living their lives when they
were raped, tortured, taken hostage by Hamas.
Raped and tortured. Huh?
Well the rape we can prove at this point with all the facts
has not been proven.
Tortured is a stretch, especially if you think that the
making their face bleed is tortured.
But you know it's crime if you think that's what happened.
But we haven't proven that either. They're just, my,
my assumption, my,
my gut on this is this person doesn't even know any better.
He actually thinks that's the reality.
Or maybe he's lying for it. It doesn't really matter.
Here is, thank you to Dr.
Ishtar of Irk who shared this
and I'll prove it to you, not just a screenshot
'cause we're not ridiculous like a lot of people on Twitter
or hashtag Twitter files.
But he shows all these screenshots of these four articles,
which by the way, you can see
after you know her first, uh, taken
during her first Shabbat on base surveillance, soldier,
soldier, Karina Reeve,
this one just in the subtext subtitle says,
missing from the Nahal Oz base, which
by the way is what David said as well.
Well let's prove this, shall we?
Oh, and then the other point as we go through this is
to recognize that they were not just reservists,
they were not just also IDF, not the they were serving.
And this was the video which I think is relevant to this,
that was circulating this.
Put this is, this is them.
They put this video out
and they were dancing while children being murdered in,
in a, this is real time.
This was after October 7th. And here's just that clip.
- A - Little insulting to say the least.
Is it not? Well children are being bombed to death.
But we saw a lot of these guys.
What I think is interesting is this came out
and was posted on social media, Instagram,
and that's probably what gave away
their location, don't you think?
And they got taken. It's it,
and again, as IDF soldiers, they're legal targets.
I know that may anger some people
because it destroys your narrative
or makes your uncomfortable, but is the truth.
And anything was done to them,
which is more than taking them is a crime.
That's a reality. But I think that's very important.
Now, this one just was more clear.
You can see their faces better.
That's why I wanted to include that.
So let's get into the articles themselves.
Well, again, first of all, here's the New York Post.
Here are the girls who can get pregnant, lying
or not knowing any better, showing that they don't know
what they're doing here.
And they're, they're even
another, they're following up with another one.
Look, this is the same outlet. Look in a new video.
They just keep pushing the why, how long
until they recognize they're wrong
or have to acknowledge it because they don't care.
Okay? So first of all, they say it down here as well, girls
who can get pregnant, and they list off their names.
So just in case there's any confusion, these are the names
that they're at least claiming that those women are.
Okay? So let's go through, let's look at these articles
and compare the names themselves.
And every one of them are
the ones we're gonna look at right here.
So here's the first one. Now,
what I'm gonna show you is not only is has Times
of Israel edited these articles to remove the point
that they are in i the part of the IDF, but,
but they are, are all towing the line when
it comes to this illusion.
Now ask yourself, why would Times
of Israel remove those things if to them it's not a,
it doesn't make any difference, or, I mean, it's obvious
that there's a reason it's being removed
because it proves my point
and others that are making it that armed resistance
occupied territory, POWs, they're legal targets
and that's why it's being removed,
because they're desperate to make you think these people are
civilians Here, first of all is the, uh, the name of the,
the, the article before they changed it.
So right now it says, taken captive,
seen being led in a car still during her pajamas.
But before they changed it, it still says,
or I mean, even still on the, on the,
when you look it up online, during her first Shabbat on,
which was the point that we were
showing you, that's what this was.
I think I have it right here. Oh no, this one, oh,
don't, don't do it again.
I think that was it is gonna make, I'm worried it's gonna,
here it is gonna crash on me again
during her first Shabbat on base.
That, that's actually what it said. Okay?
And that's why they changed it.
Now you can see that they, it says it right there.
But here's an article. Where was it?
Right here it still says the old title.
And this is from Jewish Post News,
a very pro-Israel platform surveillance soldier
after three days, oh wait, am I gonna the wrong one?
Hold on. Jumping ahead. Okay. Yeah.
So the first one just to show you right there,
that it clearly says that on this right there,
and you can see first Shabbat on base.
Next one, same thing. This has been changed.
Leary Alba seen in Hamas video being abducted, right?
Same thing after three days after.
And that's the point of the other one.
It sh that's because it says
after days on base, that's what the URL says.
But here is the repost before the other one changed
after three days on base
and follows up saying the post taken captive surveillance
soldier after three days on base
appeared on the Times of Israel.
She was new arrival to the Nall s Army base.
So they're deleting this stuff, guys. It's open.
Oh, they're acknowledging,
they know they're lying about this stuff.
Here's the other one. Daniella Gilboa
doesn't say anything about that.
This is where they changed right there.
It doesn't say anything about the base.
Well, here I actually have the way back machine
where it says, observation Soldier
19 has been missing from the Noha Oz base since October 7th.
Daniela Gilboa guys,
they're literally changing the articles.
There isn't, there's nothing near that says updated. Why?
Because they're dishonest.
Again, it's the same as this one right here.
Now, observation soldier, I think that's damning guys for,
for Times of Israel and for the entire narrative.
Here's the last one. Taking captive cor Carina AV told
parents, continue your lives.
You can sell, there's nothing in there about a base
or anything, but right there, oh,
this one, the this, this one.
It says, now here's the Jewish Post
that was just simply reposting directly
and has the same link and everything from the Times
of Israel Soldier Karina Reve.
Weird that they took that out.
And again, a surveillance soldier stationed at na na ha
nahal oz in the guys, it, these are just, I just wanted
to make sure we use the exact articles to show you
that not only that Israel's lying about it,
but the times of Israel is editing
their articles to cover it up.
But you can find this stuff, it's easily identifiable.
You can look up their names. You can prove even Israel put
out screenshots in their montage
or their, yeah, their, um, mosaic, I guess
of all the hostages that says that they're soldiers.
I mean, this is what, this is the kind
of reactive propaganda I'm talking about.
So going back to the overall point, if it doesn't matter
that they're soldiers, then why are you hiding that?
And the reality is that most of them are like,
this person is screaming
that they were innocent civilians that have nothing to do with that.
And then saying they were raped and tortured.
Well, let's address that point too, seeing us
how this is undeniable as far as I'm concerned.
First and foremost, there's a lot of this going around
or has been out for a while
that shows you what they have been doing.
Engaging with these hostages does not mean
that there's not other aspects that we have yet to see
where they're doing all the horrible things they claim.
But it's hard to wrap your mind around if we have tens
of 20, I think it may,
I forget the exact number now, how many people have come back?
There's at least 15 people that I've seen that have said,
they treated us kindly.
They gave us food like one after another.
There's video of like eight
or nine of them all leaving, smiling, shaking hands.
And yeah, in that moment you could say
maybe they're scared, they're lying.
They've maintained their stories right till this point,
except for a few of them
that weirdly changed their stories after.
What I would argue is pressure.
So my point is simple, that you can see the way
that they're being treated it as at least so far.
And what we can prove is not
the same as what we're being told.
And here's just one of those videos where they're saying,
the scene today is, um, basically the point being that
we are Muslims muja.
He says, we will not kill a single woman or a child
or an LD person or a worshiper.
Of course it could be lying, but that's backed up by
what the others have come back and said.
It says, peace be upon.
And we killed the fighters and spared the women children.
And the point is that they argue that they're treating
the soldiers differently, which would be under
international law.
And he said, and he basically says, this is
how the resistance treated women in
elderly on the 7th of October.
There's plenty of videos about it.
And of course they could be lying,
they could be doing that to make a narrative.
But you show me the alternative evidence.
It says, any girl that Zionist post is a soldier.
So she treat, so she's treated as one
that's referencing the other point.
Now, same idea.
Here's a woman that we've shown
before who says, when she asked them, she was worried,
but they said, don't worry, I'm a Muslim.
I will not hurt you. And this has been her story since
it caught me up by surprise.
She said, on the other hand, it took
me a lot of pressure off of me.
And she continues talking about it in public.
And this was some of the earlier ones
that really made them look bad.
The very first person
that came back said they treated her kindly and they,
and they everyone attacked her for it.
Here's another example. And this one is of the one we saw
where the older woman, the elderly woman,
is holding the guy's gun, which seems kind
of crazy and giving a peace sign.
Now, here she is speaking about that well after the fact
and speaking about how they were kind to her, how they were,
I mean, the point is it's not what we're being told.
You can watch it for yourself.
And then here is how the ridiculous Israeli propaganda
effort framed this, which is really embarrassing.
Now, the music was added to make it seem more ridiculous,
but it's nonetheless ridiculous.
- Look at this grandmother being forced
to hold hammas terrorist rifle
as he takes a picture with her.
This is inhumane. Inhumane,
- Right?
You know, inhumane while they're murdering children in their
beds, starving them to death, right?
Inhumane. I mean, it's, it's the very least.
It's the point to the, I mean, not very least, the point
to make is that that is not a member of the IDF.
So that is a crime period.
We have to understand that, right?
We have to recognize that that is a crime no matter
how nice they are to her.
They took an elderly woman, which is not part.
So that's clear. So if they're not, so, if,
if people out there are high remove, you know, try
to pretend like that doesn't play a factor, then
that's also something you should consider.
But again, you could, they have arguments
for why they think everybody there is a fair target.
And we've heard them say that. And you can consider
for yourself what their arguments are.
It still does not change the law.
But if when taken into the full context,
it really does not only show
that they've lied about damn near everything
that's happening there, that the lies are not even remotely
enough to ha to remove
or omit how much has been done
to the Palestinian people for 75 years.
And the unbelievable amount
of atrocities in genocides since October 7th.
It matters. Now,
as I showed you before the Associated Press came out,
and this is from, uh, this is from yesterday,
takeaways from the AP examination of how
to debunked accounts of sexual violence on
October 7th originated.
And this was just a screenshot that, uh, IGRA,
I had it highlighted, but it went away
nearly three months later.
Oh, actually, I know where I can read it from.
Right here, here. So the
point is, it says, uh, in general,
after 10 80 dozens of shot and burned
or mutilated bodies, again, the burned
and mutilated, a lot of those turned out to be burned
because of the IDF bombings,
because of the IDF tank shelling.
That's a verifiable reality.
There, there there's no munitions that they had
that could have caused the kind
of destruction that we now see.
That's why they conflated a whole bunch of Hamas members
as Robert called the very first day as I think it was,
uh, Costello.
Chuck Costello lied about that
and said it was all babies in dumpster.
No, it was IDF members that they,
or rather, uh, Hamas members, that they are
alongside the family members and people that were with them.
And they just conflated it all as all Hamas.
But this was caboose re which remember the security head of
that caboose said on the record
that they saw them shoot civilians.
And it says, one of the hardest hit communities.
This, this person mig uh, kin reached the home
that would put him in the center of the global clash.
He found a body of a teenage girl, who, by the way, most
of these representatives still make this argument.
Who they claim her, her pants were pulled down
and they claimed that that was because she was raped.
Now, this is different than the one that we've talked about.
That was the Kurdish the old, the,
basically the video we've proven,
the image we've proven comes from the very least 2022
that even then they lied about
and said it was something in Ukraine,
but it turned out to be a Kurdish woman
that Max Blumenthal covered.
That's a separate example. 'cause it was out in the field.
But my point is, that's already been proven to be a lie.
Multiple people have claimed they saw that body,
but in this case, they're talking about inside the building
and they're saying, at least I believe
so maybe this is the same example.
Either way, the point is they go on to say the details of
what he's seen and asked if they might have
seen some other interpretation.
Excuse me. He says today he maintains that he said,
he never said outright
that the girl whose body he saw had been sexually assaulted.
Nonetheless, people are still pushing that lie.
But even worse, nearly three months later today, yesterday,
Zika found out that his interpretation was in fact wrong,
even though they're still pushing this lie.
After cross-checking with military contacts, Zaka learned
that the group, a group of soldiers
otherwise IIDF had dragged her body across the room
to make sure it wasn't booby trapped.
Or at least that's what we're told.
My interpretation is they did this
to make it look like she was raped.
That's what I think. 'cause I'm not,
not saying I could prove that,
but I think Max already showed one from before.
That was the woman that was pulled out of a jeep
after she was killed by IDF bombings.
And the rigor mortis had already set in
and her body was frozen with like she was sitting in a chair
that was pulled out in the ground and they made that look.
And this was completely debunked. Same thing here.
And it says, as they did that, her pants came down
as they dragged her out of the room.
And we know this now even Associated press,
and we still get Israeli
representatives who push these lies.
The other debunked account originated from his colleague.
Uh, we know Yo Lando also a longtime volunteer at re
and in the days and weeks, the fall of the attack,
he told global media that he,
what he said was a pregnant woman lying on the floor
with a fetus cut out of her body.
Everyone has proven that to be a falsehood,
even his own people, even harts, even US media.
But now he acts like, the point is they went on,
basically this other person came in
and said that they, what they saw was a, a heavy set person
with something else next to her, which was unidentifiable.
But he said he told Landell this wasn't a pregnant woman.
However, Landell still believes his version.
You mean he still lies about it even though
people and experts have checked.
It's not what happened, but he still lies about it.
This is a, here's my problem, is even
as Associated Press proves the story's false,
they still water down the accountability of it all.
I do not believe for a second
that these are accidental mistakes.
That's crazy. And here we are, as they're still saying,
mute away rape and all the things they're
pushing as that's not true.
Suppressed news also highlights the other side of this,
the same story, but from the UN
and their investigation, her even covered this.
He says, there is no rape evidence,
no one was raped on October 7th, at least as we can prove.
And I agree with that. It says, the mission team,
specifically in forensic pathologist
and the digital analyst reviewed over 5,000 photos, 50 hours
and several audio files and footage of the attacks.
So the first point is all they did was review the same
Israeli setup information,
but then it says in the media, uh, what does that say?
Meteorological assessment of available photos and videos.
No tangible indications of rape could be identified.
How do you spin that into proof?
But it says, while the mission team reviewed extensive
digital material depicting a range of egregious violations,
no digital evidence specifically depicting acts
of sexual violence was found in the open sources.
Now, this is a screenshot, but we've already gone over this
in depth in our shows in the, on the show.
This is both a combination of what the UN statement said
and what Hart said in their, one of their statements
beyond this, from inquiries put
to three bodies in the defense establishment by ettes,
it emerges that the intelligence material collected
by the police and the intelligence bodies,
including footage from terrorist body cams themselves,
does not contain visual documentation
of any acts of rape themselves.
On top of the fact that we've shown you this,
which is there supposedly the end, the mic drop
for this whole conversation,
which was the UN representative Perilla Patton, who
outwardly, and watch this for yourself,
if you don't remember, said
that this was not an investigation.
We did not even allot blamed anybody.
And, and even said that many of the things we've proven
to be false, that then became the statement
that she proved their claims.
She prepared the report on the alleged sexual violence on
October 7th, and she admits the report is not an
investigation and that it contains unfounded
and outright false testimonies.
Think about how that gets lied about,
just like the claim we showed you mo a moment ago.
Now here's a, now
before I even play this, this is not as graphic as some,
but there are naked men in this picture, in this video,
and it's actually really difficult to watch now, regardless
that it shows naked men.
So if you have family members, you have young children,
I would recommend you don't let them watch this.
Now, what I think this is important
because this shows you how is
Palestinian detainees are treated
before there's any kind of a process
before anyone's been like, as if there's even a process
where people, children are held for 20 years without charge,
which is a real, which has happened more than once
and still happens to this day, that these are people
that they've detained, arrested.
And you'll see what they do to them
as we're screaming about claims made by people
who have been caught lying right to this very moment.
Here's what's happening on this side,
- You - Guys stripping them naked in
and of itself is an act of torture, an act
of sexual manipulation,
being violent with them.
Look at this guys, I mean, And they're laughing about it.
They're laughing about it. That is the reality.
You have to understand that this is
what these people have done to them and still do to them.
And that's what we'll show you next
is actually being called out.
Jamal Dawar, a human rights lawyer, seemingly real one,
unlike Oren Troia, I think was his last name.
And he is also an adjunct professor at New York NY
University and was formally
with the Human Rights Watch in A CLU
or currently with ACL U.
Excuse me. He says, UN torture experts call
to probe Israel's abuses.
And this is all of course, gonna spin out the Israeli,
you know, circle because their mind and when this happens,
and the way they'll frame it is you only go up
after Jews, you only go
after Israelis if they don't wanna make it
that, but that's where it's gonna go.
It's gonna be about Jewish people.
It's gonna be because you're antisemite
and you're ignoring all the rape
that happened while focusing on lies about Israel.
That's not the reality. It's been very clearly shown the un,
even their own parallel patent acknowledge
that there was no evidence to back up the claims.
No proof. On top of this, we can see overwhelming
evidence going back long
before October 7th, what Israel actually does,
he says, and he reads a part of it.
I'm particularly concerned that this emerging pattern
of violations coupled with an absence of accountability
and transparency, is transparency is creating a permissive
environment for further abuse
and Emil humiliating treatment to Palestinians.
This was on the United Nations, uh, website from May,
May 23rd from today, un expert calls for probe
of allegations of torture
and mistreatment against Palestinian detainees.
And I'm gonna read this to you. It says,
the special re repertoire on torture,
Alice Jill Edwards has urged the government of Israel
to investigate, which is the ridiculous part of this,
that they will not do that
and quite frankly, claim they already did.
And the reality, this is exactly why the ICC is
doing something against them.
And it says, investigate multiple allegations of torture
and other cruel inhumane
or degrading treatment of pun punishment
or punishment against detained Palestinians
just since October 7th.
And it says, since the attacks of October 7th, 2023,
and it goes well before that, it is es estimated that
thousands of Palestinians
including children have been detained.
So just factor that in for a second
for anybody honest out there.
See, we're talk, we're we're,
we're All we're doing is in some cases people are screaming
about the people in many cases who were legally taken
as POWs, as detainees
because they were IDF members and some that weren't.
And that's a crime. We should call it out.
The point is, we're comparing that to thousands and,
and acting like there's no, there's only one side.
We should be focusing on thousands of people,
not not Hamas members as even has been admitted by them.
And I'll show you an important claim in a second
where they admit how many Hamas they claim they've killed,
which shockingly reveals how many they've killed
that are civilians even under their numbers,
which I don't take at face value.
Thousands of innocent people, even if you think some
of them are, the point is they're detaining all
these people and they're holding them.
And it goes before October 7th
where there were already thousands held.
Those are hostages. The real sense.
There's no, there's no legal crime.
The the point is that you wanna highlight the ones
that have, let's just say, thrown a stone.
And you wanna pretend that justifies years
of detention without charge.
That's on you to rect you and God can deal with that.
My point is, there's a whole provable block of them.
The UN has called this out.
Human rights groups that have never been charged.
How, what else do you call that?
Palestinians from the West Bank, including East Jerusalem,
continues and from Gaza are being held in prisons run
by Israeli Prison Services.
And in IDF camps, camps, these are
held from West Bank even.
So we're also talking about an not, not just Gaza.
The special repertoire received allegations
of individuals being beaten, kept in cells, blindfolded
and handcuffed for excessive periods, deprived of sleep,
threatened with physical and sexual violence in some
cases, carrying that out.
Other reports suggested prisoners have been insulted
and exposed to acts of humiliation, such
as being photographed and filmed
and degrading pros, just like we showed you
that was posted on social media.
While prolonged use
of zip tie handcuffs has reportedly caused friction injuries
and wounds, even to the point where they've had their arms
and legs amputated,
that's been backed up by human rights groups.
It says, I'm particularly
concerned, this is the quote I read for you.
That is that this emerging pattern of violations coupled
with the absence of accountability
and transparency is creating permissive environment
for further abuse and humiliating treatment.
It appears that no effective measures have been taken
by the Israeli authorities to investigate these allegations.
That is huge and important.
They're gonna say that the UN is amass, so who cares, right?
But the reality is that the us, Matt Miller,
the UK re Rishi, all of them know that they, when
the moment they say they're investigating, they'll stand up
and say, we're already did it, we're done, we're not guilty.
And they'll pretend like
there's some kind of ongoing process.
The UN is calling them out saying they have not taken any
effective measures to actually investigate
since October 7th.
The growth in the prison population has exacerbated a
preexisting overcrowding problem.
Yeah, you kind of have an, it's hard to
clearly you're gonna have an overcrowding problem when you
just arrest thousands of innocent people
and leave them in there for decades, right?
And it was already a problem.
I go wonder why Now it's leading to guess what?
Lowering of the standards according to the experts.
And we already showed you what Ben Vere came in and did.
It says official downgrading
of its conditions in certain places, meaning he came in
and said, no, that needs to be worse.
They should have less of that. They should have smaller
spaces that's real.
As Ben Gavi came through
and made that a public statement,
these people believe they're unaccountable.
Hopefully we're gonna show 'em
otherwise official downgrading
of conditions when it was already a
problem is not acceptable.
They said at all times,
the minimum inter international
standards must be adhered to.
He says, how how we treat others during moments
of crisis is a sign of how we treat
how much we have internalized human rights.
Clearly we can see that example not applying here.
They're showing that they don't care.
No circumstances, however exceptional can ever justify
torture or ill treatment.
None that very note, let's not forget that even
AMS international from November 8th proved
with their own research, horrifying cases of torture
and degrading treatment of Palestinian detainees,
both in the West Bank and in Gaza
and in Israel, by the way, occupied Palestine.
But it says the Israeli authorities must investigate.
They don't care. They won't, they'll disregard this.
All complaints and reports of torture
or ill treatment promptly impartially
effectively and transparently.
You know what the response is gonna be?
You're an antisemite and you're Hamas,
mark my words probably already happened.
Those responsible at all levels, including commanders,
must be held accountable.
Exactly. While victims have a right to reparation and comp
and compensation, the UN expert called on the government
of Israel to allow immediate access
to international human rights and humanitarian observers.
They won't do that to all the places in
which Palestinians have been detained.
I mean, what's crazy to me is
that this isn't even necessary.
This has been documented for decades. They know about this.
This is what frustrates me about these international bodies.
It's probably because as I've said,
they're probably just recognizing
they have to go in this direction.
Not necessarily the urs,
but the body is that they've already done this.
They've already called them out and exposed these things.
And so it shouldn't be like, let's initiate a new process,
highlight what you've already done
and say that you're demanding,
that you confirm that it has not been changed.
That's the way you should do it. The UN expert previously
expressed her condemnation for the attacks of October 7th.
The fact that you even have to make
that statement is ridiculous.
The point is, she has, like all the rest of them condemned
what they saw on October 7th,
but their argument's gonna be,
how dare you only point at this and not point at that.
Well, they already did guys, but it's gonna happen
because that's what their only excuse is.
Now, the B, BC and plenty
of others have already highlighted this as well.
This is from two days ago, Gazen shackled
and blindfolded at Israel Hospital
showing you and read this.
It's horrifying what they're doing.
And that was one of the examples we talked about.
I believe that's right there. This person had
to get his leg amputated because of what they did.
And a lot of this is happening now, let's talk about Norway,
Spain, and Ireland, and the idea of normalization,
or excuse me, not normalization,
but the idea of the, um,
acknowledgement of a Palestinian state.
Sorry, I'm just trying to close some of
these tabs real quick.
I think this is gonna freeze on me again.
Norway, Ireland and Spain say they'll recognize a
Palestinian state deepening Israel's isolation.
Very important, very, very important.
Now, this of course, has caused a huge problem.
The, the most of these Zionists have
completely lost it about this.
Now, Ireland has been outspoken about this for a long time,
but Norway, Spain, like, at the very least,
they've been kind of most of the, of the,
what you would call the western world has been very clearly,
at least playing it down the middle.
Right? So this is a huge shift,
and again, i I honestly, other than Ireland,
for the most part, since they've been so outspoken about it,
I largely see this as going along with what they see
as the momentum, which is what governments do.
Now, I'm not gonna say I know that hopefully they're good
people that just realize there's a problem.
But I, I've, I'm very jaded when it comes to government.
I think overall it's most likely just
that they see the writing on the wall and they go along.
That's so, let's be, make sure that we think about that,
that we don't just assume, uh, you know, a lot, um,
suddenly start claiming
that these people are on one side or the other.
And I think it's really just about the mo.
If this suddenly shifted in Israel's favor,
they would probably go right back into line.
That'd be my sad assumption. But let's hope for the best.
Wait for the facts. Now, Fred,
Freddie Pontone follows up highlighting this story.
Norway, Israel, and Spain recognized
policy in the state on Wednesday.
Now, I don't, I don't know if it says that they have
said they would, but maybe he co maybe
he followed up and they actually did.
Either way. I believe that's where it's going.
So he's claiming that they have,
and it says Norway, prime Minister Jonah Scar stores said
the Scandinavian country will officially recognize a
Palestinian state as of May 28th.
Okay? Yeah. So it's more so that they're going to right,
but either way, it's seems to be pretty clear.
And you can, you can wa that was the point really,
is you can watch this whole uh, um,
presentation they put forward.
Now, interestingly, and not surprisingly right
after this happened, Norway is Ireland
and Spain recognized Palestinian state.
Israel immediately recalls ambassadors, right?
So this, this is the same thing
as APAC pulling funding for politicians.
It shows you that this is
not the way this's supposed to work.
Your ambassadors are not some kind
of punitive tool that you can use.
It's supposed to be about diplomacy, right?
So even when they're not, well, even when your enemies,
you're supposed to have diplomacy.
At least that's what we're supposed to pretend was the case.
And that's in the, in past is how it's gone.
Like famous, you know, go Reagan, Gorbachev, you know,
this whole, it's so you're supposed to be a point
where you have diplomacy, even at the height of war.
That's also been, that's clearly been kind of shrieked away
because people act like you're
now siding with some other side.
The point is that this is them pulling their ambassadors
just because they recognize Palestine,
which interestingly enough is
what Israel husband pretending they want for decades.
Not Hamas mind you, but Palestine sad, right?
But it shows you how childish this is,
how desperate this has become.
And I, I think as usual, Ilan, Ms. Rahi just nails it here.
Remember, he's an Israeli Jew from Israel highlighting this.
He says, let us forget what this day means for Israel
and Israelis, because today has cataclysmic legal,
political, financial and normative implications.
Now, this was yesterday.
He says, what this day means is that a number
of important countries with many
more forecasts to join them.
I agree with that as see Israel and Israelis soldiers
and civilians alike
as illegal invaders in the sovereign state of Palestine.
Or they see that that's what people are thinking
and they're going along with it either way.
That's what the statement suggests when they are in the West
Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza.
He says, this is what they, this really means,
and this is huge tectonic departure from the previously
accepted acceptable diplomatic approach to the issue
of Palestine, which was always to pretend
that you want some kind of equal balance
and letting Israel do whatever they want.
And it says, Ireland, Norway,
and Spain tell the world, Israel must no longer be treated
as a party to solving or addressing the Palestinian matters.
This is also saying that the US saying to the us,
and I agree with this, you
and your approach have become not only irrelevant,
but obstructive to justice for crying out loud.
You can say that about damn near
everything they're involved in right now.
That doesn't mean that it has to be that way
or that this indictment of the entire idea of America,
it's about the government that we have allowed as Americans
to completely get out of control
because of outside influence.
But we can change it. The whole point is that this is wrong.
What's happening, but we can make it better.
That's the reality of how this should work.
And it doesn't even mean going through some kind
of ridiculous false voting process as I see it,
but it means that we can, and we're doing it right now,
the era of playing softball.
He says, with Israel, at the expense of Palestinian lives,
dignity and property is reaching its most delayed
end Zionist.
Politicians can clamor and stomp their feet all they want
and all day long Israel's legitimacy, excuse me,
pardon me.
I just had to make something. Might have to clear my throat.
Continuing scientist politicians can clam
and somp their feet all they want.
And all day long Israel's legitimacy
and standing are being severely degraded
and there's no coming back from this.
And that's not necessarily to say that that's what, you know
for people that wanna frame that as like you're
have some kind of racism against
Israel or some kind of a hatred.
It's not even necessarily about that.
So I'm sure plenty of people do,
and they have a right to, quite frankly,
because of what they've carried out.
My point is it's stating the objective reality.
Israel's legitimacy and standing are very clearly degrading.
So that's, it's facts become racist in this context
because of the way that they push these narratives.
But it says, Israel will not know how to treat this.
What we, we know what they will do.
It's already happening as it didn't know what to do before
or after October 7th.
He says, excessive American support has made it delusional
in addressing its actual powers.
So he says, like, I expect this process of delegitimization
to intensify in years to come.
Great point at the end, this is now about, not about,
this is now about 1967.
Israel's reaction is gonna make it about 1948.
It's very interesting. Now, the response to this is
what you would expect, just like I was saying, as I said,
this is the type of ridiculous response you get from Israeli
representatives, even fired ones
after Spain, Ireland, Norway recognized a Palestinian state,
not a Hamas state, a Palestinian state, exactly
what Israel's always pretended they want.
Here's what Elon Levy said. I mean,
this is just shockingly stupid.
Ireland is encouraging Hamas to abduct more Jewish babies.
Spain is encouraging Hamas to burn more Jewish families.
Norway is encouraging Hamas to rape more Jewish women.
Well, again, let's make sure we recognize
that it a huge portion, if not half of the people that were
affected on October 7th were not Jewish.
But they don't care about them.
Always revealing to you
that they have a very clearly biased, bigoted
and racist perspective on the world.
But overall, Jewish babies, well, as far as I could tell,
there was only one, which was the Bibas family.
But either way, even that is a, a manufactured lie
to act like it was the main point being
that they're acknowledging a Palestinian state is them
going, yes, take babies.
Uh, it's just, it's cartoonish.
And then the idea of burning families, again
from the top down has been shown that that was the actions
of Israel that killed their own people as well as Hamas
and the rape ideal we just went through.
But here he is desperately pushing the same nonsense.
And look, and this was earlier almost ratio,
but of course you get these bots that come out
and push it back up, in my opinion.
But in any case, look at the overall, like you can see
that they've lost control of this a long time ago.
But here is what Israel cats came out
and said, same thing in, in a way,
I've issued a severe DeMar for the Israel ambassadors
of Spain, Ireland, and, and Norway in Israel
to following their government's decision to award.
Award. Oh, fuck me.
I think my allergies are kicking up decision to award,
award a gold medal to Hamas terrorists.
I don't even, where, what does that even mean?
So acknowledging a state
that you guys pretended you wanted is now them giving a
medal to Hamas.
I mean, it just, these are completely
disconnected from reality.
And even if you wanna pretend
that doing this now helps Hamas,
you just can't keep jamming these things together,
acting like therefore Ireland wants to help Hamas.
That's not what's happening.
And overall, you can clearly see
that a Palestinian state based on everything we're talking
about, would relieve the actual problem, let,
assuming Israel wouldn't just keep
trying to kill all the Palestinians.
But he goes on to say the Hamas terrorists
who kidnapped our daughters
and burned infants, going back to the infants, that's,
again, these are flat out lies.
That's a lie from the very beginning.
The one that I said Chuck Costello shared
that they somehow burned a bunch of babies, not true
that has been debunked from every possible level.
And he says the amba, and this is the craziest part to me,
during the march, the ambassadors will watch a video
of the brutal and cruel kidnapping of our daughters.
So he says to emphasize
and distort their, this distorted decision.
So first they say, we're gonna make them watch this video,
which I don't know how they have the right to do that.
Like I guess this DeMar process makes them have
to go show up, but realize
that Israel doesn't respond to anything like this.
They don't want to, they ignore you in resolutions.
They don't bother to, I mean,
they just bond in embassy for crying out loud.
They don't care about these processes.
But of course, mothers do.
So what I found fascinating is apparently they showed up
and here's what El and Levy said
after Spain, island, Norway decided
to reward the gang rapes of October 7th.
The desperation is dripping off these people.
It's just, it's, it's embarrassing. It's a clown show.
And that's not to say that crimes were committed, obviously,
but that's how bad this is.
He says, by recognizing a
Palestinian state that doesn't exist.
Well, yeah, man, I mean, again,
these people are ridiculously stupid.
First of all, if they were recognizing a Palestinian state,
that's because it's not there.
You absolute. I mean that's, gosh,
it's so frustrating how stupid.
The point is that clearly you've maintained the reality
that this isn't there, that you're calling
for a two-state solution, right?
Even though you now show that you never wanted that,
and they're simply going, we're going to establish
that this is now a Palestinian state.
Yeah, it didn't because you wouldn't let it.
And that's what they're doing. I don't even think he
understands the process or he just is lying.
But it says Israel's foreign minister forced,
forced their ambassadors
to watch fresh footage of the abductions.
It's the same thing we just got shown the atrocities.
They are encouraging, not even remotely.
So lemme get this straight. So you called them in
to watch your disgusting snuff film
of completely manipulated
and propagandize information,
how much you wanna bet they didn't shift their opinion.
In any case, we already know as Owen Jones Dili has, has,
uh, Hussein highlighting what he said,
you can watch the whole 20 minute video for yourself.
He watched the video. He says he was, here's my response
to watching the screening of the video.
They're claiming, they're showing them, right?
He said, it does not show proof of beheaded babies.
It does not show proof of homos killing children.
No proof of rape, no proof of beheading humans alive.
The same things we keep talking about.
And he, in this video, he says he was troubled by this.
And he reached out to a UK journalist
and American journalists
who were all there and they said the same thing.
We didn't see what they said. We remember that at
that same moment, people came out
and said, it proves everything.
Clearly. There are people lying about this guys.
So think about that as they come, they force them
to keep watching this disgusting film.
Remember that's the one that Rabbi Schmoley
said he watched for like the seventh time.
These people are deranged.
If they are not only knowingly watching something
that's a completely manufactured propaganda film,
but then watching this snuff film over
and over, there's something very wrong
about all this, obviously.
But this is what they're doing to people
that just wanna recognize a Palestinian state.
How do you go from pretending that's what you want
to then saying that doing so is terrorism.
This is what pe this is a joke.
, it's so funny, I love communists.
Like some of the chats says, oh, and
Jones, it's a communist.
Okay, cool. What does that mean?
What does that mean in the context to the fact
that he's highlighted the ideas
that this is not really there suddenly
because he's a communist.
His, his, his acknowledgement of a lie doesn't make sense.
Or the UK journalist,
the American journalist, are then compromised because of that.
I just don't get why that's even
relevant to the conversation.
People are ridiculous. My point is
that the communism democracy, zary, they're all,
they're pol political ideologies that can be manipulated
by powerful people at the top.
It's about time we stop being so challenges about the idea
that only one is the bad one, and these are the good ones.
Politics are a problem, guys.
My point is that people will abuse power no matter
what ideology we're discussing here.
Elon Levy falls up horrific father
and son, Hamas team confess to gang raping women.
They just go right back to the same old plays.
Guys realize that these videos have already been shown
and called out by other me, even in the corporate media
where they are forced these people,
and I'll just bring up the one
that's easy to grab right now.
Uh, let's see, what was it?
This one, Israeli court says,
shin bet pressured man to give false testimony.
That's I 24. You will find an endless string of these
same statements going back with decades.
They admit that they were pressured to give false statements
for the Israeli government, and yet we can't factor
that in in some cases right now.
We clearly, they don't want to.
The reality is that these people have already go back
to the first three videos they put out like this, right?
What were they saying? Beheaded babies,
burning pe They said all the things that later turned out
to be provably false.
And yet they still do it pushing the lie.
The, that they did all the things that we have been debunked
by even her rats, by even Associated Press.
They just keep pushing the lies.
Why did they come out on the 23rd?
Because of the point I'm making right now.
Because they needed to shut down the bigger story.
They need to hide what is going on
because they are desperately losing control
and have already lost it, quite frankly.
But here's the other responses we get.
Here's one of the most deranged people in this government,
Schmo rich, following the recognition of Palestine,
or the statement about to do so from the,
the Israeli finance minister Morich informed Netanyahu
that he would withhold Palestinian tax revenues
and refrain from transferring them
to the Palestinian authority until further notice.
Oh, okay. So now you're gonna punish the West Bank. Got it.
Anybody confused on that? How clear that is?
You're doing something about they're,
they're three countries
that have no involvement on the ground with Gaza
or the West Bank, decide of their own accord
to establish a Palestinian state or acknowledge it.
And MWI goes, oh, okay,
then we're gonna stop giving the money
that's owed to the West Bank.
And rally goes to the Palestinian authority,
which is not on the side of Palestinians,
but it's about the, the, the, the way it's perceived.
And even then, let's not pretend like this is al this
is not always what's happening.
The money and the aid and the things that go
through get facilitated by Israel, have
for decades been used and transferred
and not given and hold to.
These people are taken entirely.
My point here is
that this is collective punishment like the rest of it,
but now overlapping the West Bank
because they see them all as the same.
It's not hard to recognize,
especially when you have statements from them
going, they're all the same.
They're all animals. Like we have many of them.
Here is Ben Gere,
the other complete lunatic in this government.
Unlike most of the rest
of them are like most of the rest of them.
And I'm, I'm talking about the Zionist factions
and the, I mean, they're, but my problem is that most
of the people in the Israeli coalition right now, and
and even the government for that matter, are pretty extreme.
That's not my opinion. You can listen to what they have
to say, but I think that's the problem.
It's sort of like our government.
Look at our government right now.
It's not an indictment of just Israel.
Our government is wildly crazy right now, guys,
more than I've ever seen in my life.
They're petty, they're small.
They're, they're irrational, they're unconstitutional.
It's terrifying. But he, this is what happened
after they recognize, say they're going
to recognize the Palestinian state, which again,
it's not like Go ho.
Kamas called up and said, do this for us.
So Ben Gvi makes a statement inside Ask Alla Mosque.
He says, this morning I went to the Temple Mount,
the most sacred place for the people of Israel,
and which belongs solely to the state of Israel.
That's not true. In fact, nobody in the world,
I mean every Jordan definitely disagrees.
The point is that this is a mosque right now.
They believe it's supposed to be something else.
The prophecy argues it's gonna be destroyed,
and that's where it be rebuilt for Israel.
Clearly they believe this
or at at least they want you to think they believe it.
But that's not the static legal reality.
And that's what they do when they storm in there.
Robert's written about it a lot
and shoot people sometimes with real bullets,
but most cases with smoke grenades
and rubber bullets and people are praying in there.
They do it to make a statement.
They do it to punish Palestine as a whole.
There's no bitter example of collective punishment.
He says there, I made it clear, this is his statement,
that in no uncertain terms, the countries
that recognized a Palestinian state this morning want
to reward the kidnappers of the lookouts.
Oh, so now they're all, yes, that's what he's saying.
That your reward Palestine is a state for all of them,
which means they're all lookouts.
They're all working with Ga Hamas.
That's what they keep telling you.
He says, and there are tens of thousands
of supporters in Gaza.
How does it support them? How does that benefit them?
He says, we will not allow any surrender
that includes even a declaration of a Palestinian state,
despite the fact that these very people lied about wanting
that moments ago.
He says, Hamas must be utterly destroyed, not rewarded.
It's just like the narrative of there's no equivalency.
You're getting all of these mindless following Zionist
politicians in the United States
that are parroting the same thing.
Right? We can't reward Hamas with a state.
It's just mind blowing
how these same people were screeching about Tuesday
solutions 30 seconds ago, including in the United States.
These censored news caught a really interesting response
to this, this Stop Antisemites account, which by the way,
I'm bl I don't think I, yeah, it's right here.
I'm, I'm blocked shockingly enough.
, this Stop Antisemites account
with 310,000 followers on Twitter,
just made up a fake story about the daughter of Ireland's,
minister of foreign Affairs being raped
and kidnapped on October 7th.
He says, when called out, they respond
and said, oh, this is a hypothetical comparison
for illustrated purposes only.
It's all right here. This is, this is desperation.
If I've ever seen it, you, you know, they're gonna see this.
You know, I mean, it could be a threat too,
if you wanna look at it that way.
Here's the archive. Meet Ireland's, uh,
foreign minister Michael Martin family.
He's in October. On October 7th,
Tomas Terrace raped and kidnapped his daughter.
I mean, that's crazy. That's in a response.
He goes, lunacy, right? Then
why are you doing this to Israel?
And that's when they say, oh,
we're just making a, making a comparison.
Sh weird how there's no community notes on there.
There's no like, oh, you're not allowed to live.
It's just so desperately one sided here.
A false story of his daughter was posted just hours
after he announced that he would formally
recognize the state of Palestine.
It says they write to self-determination, peace, and dignity
and statehood must be vindicated.
And then they make up a
statement where his daughter getting raped.
How else do you take that guys who are the,
who are the real extreme ones here?
And there's obvious examples
of extremism in every corner of the world.
But right now, how do we not see that?
It says Ireland was joined in
today's announcement by Norway and Spain.
All three countries say they will officially
recognize Palestinian statehood.
According to WaPo,
this account specializes in getting critics of Israel fired
quote among the bevy of small social media accounts.
Stop antisemitism has become one
of the most prominent and widely followed.
None has stopped Antisemitism's rejoin impact.
The point is that they actively work
to get people removed from their jobs, which why it's good
that we are independent to the truest sense,
not the MA's out the mainstream alternative media pretending
to be you can't get me fired from anything.
You can come after me with legals lawsuits
and all like they're doing, which we will
get more into soon.
It's very clearly happening.
Now here Ben Shapiro funnels up on this same thing.
Of course, he can expect him to not lie about this story.
He says, none of these countries recognized a phantom
state of Palestine.
just, it's just hilarious to me on October 6th.
These countries are literally making the case
that slaughtering Jews did.
How did you guess that's where he would go wholesale
and then getting your asses kicked
by the IDF earns you a state.
Does anybody think that that's where they're coming from?
Does anybody think like, this is my point from before, just
because they didn't do it on October 6th does not mean
that they aren't now doing what's right.
My point is still that I don't think
they're doing it because it's right.
I think they're doing it because unlike Ben is capable
or willing to do, they see that Israel has lost this.
They see that the momentum is shockingly obviously in one
direction and they don't wanna lose because of that.
They don't wanna be called, brought into the ICJ
or the ICC under the acts of being complicit for genocide.
I think this is really factoring into people's minds,
but of course to him, he can't do anything else
to make it make sense other than to say that they did it
because they wanna see Jews get slaughtered.
How many times can they keep pushing this lie about
literally everybody, including by the way,
their own chief allies?
I just, I think this is one we're here. Maybe, oh, hold on.
I wanna skip ahead if I can find it real quick now.
I'll come back to it. I'll come
to it in a second about a post from, uh, I think it was the
Jerusalem post, but it was saying Germany, Germany
came out and said that they will arrest Netanyahu if he goes
there to their country now because of the I CCC
and ICJ, that Germany has been like their staunch supporter.
And you know why? Because they've been more pressured about
the idea of anti-Semitism than anywhere in the world
because of art World War ii.
And they have no to, they've done everything they could
to go along with Israel every way.
And the point is that even they said that now,
and that was enough for a Israeli representative to come out
and say, well, Germany has a bad history of arresting Jews.
My god, these people are just losing it.
But here's what Cassie Akiva says also from the Daily Wire.
Each of those countries were mostly neutral
as Cho Nazi Germany killed Jews and took over Europe.
Oh, interesting point, huh?
Well, let's see what these people have to say.
Norway was not neutral. It was invaded.
She falls up and says, and declare neutrality
before invasion value added.
And Noel says, so did the United States,
to which she ran away because she got completely destroyed.
That's the reality. And I love this ,
this female always cracks me up.
If you haven't seen that meme where it comes from,
it's effing hilarious to me.
It's just how that, you know, it's, anyways, it's funny.
This person says that's a mic drop. Ever seen one?
And yeah, there's no, she didn't respond. You know why?
Because it's true.
And this means that she's either
that bad in understanding the history that she claims
to know everything about, or she was willfully trying
to deceive you about that information.
You could look this up. Neutrality acts
in 1930s and afterward.
The point is, it very clearly gets into the
idea of World War ii.
It says basically, um, in these years
and in response to the growing threats
and wars that led into World War II overall,
the point is not hard to recognize that
what she's doing is a one-sided conversation.
So if you're gonna call it out and say they didn't do it,
they're, they're like the same thing that Ben was saying.
They didn't do this before. So it's not really true.
You're, you're omitting the true, the,
the real picture here.
It's not about them suddenly supporting the killing of Jews.
And the way that you try to frame it like that is desperate.
And I hope more and more people,
including Jews are beginning to call this out.
But here's even what a US representative said from Florida.
This was actually pretty crazy to me.
He says in Florida, his name is Representative Randy, fine,
if you support Muslim terror,
you'll be treated like a Muslim terrorist.
Oh yeah. So no more constitutional rights in Florida if you,
if you do what you think is Muslim terror.
Got it. Next session, he says, I will introduce legislation
that adds any country that recognizes Palestine
to Florida's list of scrutinized countries
with severe limitations on ENT entry
entities from those countries doing
business with and in Florida.
Guys, that's lunacy.
You're literally saying that if somebody look, which is
by the way their complete political uh, uh, um, prerogative,
they're deciding to recognize a state.
The idea that you're saying that,
that then makes them Muslim terrorists
for recognizing the state
that even the US currently claims they want.
I mean that, think about how wild that is
and saying that you're gonna treat them differently.
Put limitations on foreign policy.
How is that Flora's choice?
Spain Island Norway will join Iran, North Korea and Cuba.
And Syria, he says, among others on that list,
govern yourself accordingly.
That's a threat to foreign countries to not do
what they know is right, or this guy is
so completely blind he doesn't understand.
But look, he's clearly a proud Zionist.
So something tells me that he's very aware of what the,
the misinformation he's spreading.
I can't believe that. I mean, really,
truly worries me about the kind of people that are in power.
And a soft MD says, buddy, that's 76% of the planet.
They really don't want you to know that either.
He says, you're gonna need to rethink this one.
They don't care. It's desperate.
So that's 76% of the world, by the way, that
that openly support this a Palestinian
state more so every day.
Right now, they are painting themselves into a corner, guys.
And I think it's completely clear here, by the way, is
what he tweeted before, which he's deleted since then.
This was on the 10th, uh, 2023.
There is no suffering adequate for these animals.
May the streets of Gaza overflow with blood.
That's a Florida representative.
Guys, if you think that's wrong, represent that.
Now he's talking about here, he says, do not, uh, actually,
I don't even know what it is he's
just saying, triggered, don't look.
The point is there's nothing that makes, that makes sense.
Not Hamas, Gaza overflow with blood.
These animals, he's talking about Palestinians.
And here's a current one that's sort of the same.
This is this one, interestingly,
which we'll make another point about right now,
has to do with the Bibas family.
Here's what Gaza report says, the bodies
of these three executed captives, which is not what happened
to be delivered in tonight's exchange
as claimed at the Israeli channels.
Do you see what time this is?
I called this very, this is the first pause,
and they, they were going to deliver the Bibas family home.
And the, that i, that I'm, I'm convinced,
is why Israel aggressively acted like something went wrong
and they broke the thing and they
say, oh, you violated this.
And they went right back to bombing
because the Bibas family has played a central role in their
disgusting propaganda from the very beginning.
That does not change the fact
that taking the children was a crime.
See how that works? Interesting, right?
It's a crime and they should be held accountable for that.
The point is, the Bibas family was then killed
by IDF bombings, whether that's via the Hannibal directive
or just belligerent disregard for human life,
but it says that they were going to live, the families
as claimed as the, in the Israeli channels are the Bibas
family, which include the 10 month old baby.
This development is expected
to significantly exacerbate tensions in the region, right?
So then they just screeched out
and said, Nope, nope, it's over and went back to bombing.
My point is, this was exactly what happened.
Either way, we know that they were killed.
They're pretending it was because they were executed.
But I'll show you why. We know that's not true.
But he responded back in November 30th, 2023 saying,
if they killed a 10 month old baby,
there is no suffering great enough for these monsters.
He didn't do that. And my point is, as we can see here,
and this is just one of the many,
and I've talked about this explicitly,
and I'll actually, I'll include this one too, where,
and this, this, this is direct video from the father himself
who said on the record
that Israel's bombing killed their children.
Watch it for yourself. Here was a report on corporate media
where Dan Cohen covered this.
In reporting on the death of the BBAs family, CBS is forced
to acknowledge that they were killed
by Israeli airstrikes, not Hamas.
Watch it for yourself. We've gone over this 50 times.
My point is, here's what Michael has to say.
Mr. Little Mikey Apopo lying about stuff, disgusting things.
He says, the entire BBAs family was stolen on October 7th.
UNSF hasn't mentioned them.
Red Cross hasn't treated even one,
not since he's acting like they're still alive
because there's a clear propaganda motive behind that.
As I said, that's because they were killed
by IDF bombs, according to their father.
And I know you know this because I post this.
Every time you disgustingly use the memory of these kids
to maintain a genocide,
even mainstream media was forced to admit it.
Here's a Eva Claus doing the same thing.
This is on April 18th.
Why is this night different from all others showing you
the Bibas family sitting there?
Didn't say that, but you can.
That's the red heads they've made become a central
game in their propaganda.
Same thing. You still using the Viva's family
to emotionally manipulate your blind followers,
even though you know damn well they've already been
killed by IDF bombs.
It really does make me sick.
Now, there's clearly accountability on both sides here.
They should have taken children. That's a clear reality.
But then they were killed by I bombs.
And there needs to be accountability there too.
You can't just go Hamas' fault, as we know
that the Israeli government has been either disregarding
that reality, which right there shows you that
where they spoke, where they, where they just, I mean,
let's just pretend they're using
the argument of human shields.
So is that, is that okay with you Israel Israelis?
Did they just killed them because they happen
to be there with the moss members?
Or is it suddenly different now
that they're Israeli hostages?
See how that works? In any case,
oops, include this.
There's another point I wanna make in regard to
where these people are held.
Now, this is a point that David Collier made.
Let me delete some of this stuff real quick.
Telling you Twitter is really wonky for me.
I don't know if it's everybody else, but something just does
not work, doesn't close properly.
It freezes very strange. And I think I'm being throttled.
I think I'm being, you know, manipulated.
Bitrate, bitrate man, you know, whatever it is.
I think that's what's happening to me.
Still got a good more to go.
So we're gonna talk about a claim
that there are rocket launchers that were found in Rafa,
which certainly possible wouldn't surprise me
for many different reasons, but let's go over
the facts and see what it shows us.
Okay? And I, what, what I think is important is
what somebody posted, it was a National Geographic article.
I think it might have been Orwell as well.
It highlights some important discussions
about the tunnels themselves.
He says all the anti-Semites, this was May 21st.
All the antisemites in the world are celebrating today.
. Again, it's the only way they can make this work.
Even though as far as I can tell all the antisemites in the
world is a pretty small number.
Decades of preparation and lies
and demonizing Israel has finally paid off
as terrorists are still firing rockets in Israel
from multiple directions.
The ICC has tried to tie to tie Israel's hands,
and I simply said, verifiably false.
Even the IDF has admitted
that rockets fired have been exceedingly rare.
We just went over this, remember from,
I think it think it was B, B, C and other, you know,
mainstream coverage, acknowledging not what BBC said,
but what the IDF said that their firing
of rockets have been exceedingly rare direct quote
after the first three months.
Why? Because they quote ran out.
But please, I said, don't let the facts get in the way
of your genocide protecting narrative.
This person follows up with this Israel war room image
or video, excuse me, showing.
I think I might have it. Hold on. Lined up. Let's see.
Oh, I guess not. Okay, we'll show it right here.
Simply was a little kind of concrete,
which I mean it clearly this thing does not look like it was
the, there looks like it was put there, my opinion.
But either way, showing you
what are very clearly empty tubes, that's important.
Okay? But this, but let's just say it's there. Empty.
All of 'em empty. The argument is
they're claiming they were loaded and ready to fire .
You could literally see that they weren't.
And I simply said, you realize those aren't loaded, right?
just ridiculous. But lu gr uh,
lurid B makes a good point.
Well, first and foremost, my point is
that it wouldn't be shocking, especially
what we're gonna read in this article,
but the idea that you have people
that are fighting against an occupation
that are literally destroying their entire life right now,
and there are these things that are present there.
Hamas does have weapons. A point though is
that this looks old.
It looks like they're not loaded in the first place.
And many arguments in there
that this could be simply put there like just
hypothetically, because we realize they've already
been caught doing that.
So it shouldn't be some dismissed, laughable thing.
They have been caught red handed
by even corporate media putting guns in places
where they weren't before, bringing in boxes full of things.
I mean, they've been caught up, left right,
every which way in this discussion.
So what he says on top of that is says old news.
And this is another person sharing the same video.
Make note of how the existing smugglers kept the competition
from new tunnels down.
He says, a hand phone out while reader from the archive.
This is fascinating to me.
And this is an old article from um, uh, national Geographic.
Now I'm gonna read you just the thing he highlighted
that will read through this article,
and I'll come back to this point.
It says, A handful of rockets are launched
by young militants hired by local merchants
who pro whose profits would decline if Israel's
closure were further relaxed.
Think about this for a second.
This is, this is the,
a natural geographic citing this from on the
ground speaking to people.
They're saying that local merchants within Gaza,
who I'm gonna show you in this article, makes it very clear,
are working basically symbi in some symbiosis fashion,
symbiotic fashion with Israel.
That's important to understand.
We're making so much money by smuggling
through these tunnels, which also shows you it's not about
weapons entirely, which Hamas also uses,
but it's about mostly, as far as I can tell, even according
to National Geo Graphic, mostly random people using this
to get medicine and food that they otherwise can't get
and recognize even while it's happening.
There's food insecure right up until
before this starts on October 7th.
But they're saying that these local merchants
who were making so much money doing that, working both
through Israel and Egypt, right, made sure
that they just popped off a couple of random rockets here
and there to ensure that it stayed closed.
How crazy is that? It shows you
that this is not what we're being told.
I think we all know that, but
how many times have I talked about these, oh,
Rocky Hitter Field and they murder 14 people.
You know, it's like, that's part of it too, I think.
And are these local merchants working on behalf of Israel
or at least influenced by them?
I think that's a real question to ask.
Now let's go through the article and you see what I mean?
It says after, uh, I think this already went away.
Yeah, after Hamas won elections in 20 2006, which again,
we should not take at face value.
I just don't think that makes any sense.
And in fact, I think we've proven
that Israel was influenced on
everything that happened in that regard.
So, and also that they funded them
to make sure that they were in power.
So it kind of makes sense to me
that this was not what we think it is.
In any case, it's clear that Israel wanted Hamas in power in
that location and then fatal
or pa pa later in West Bank to make sure
that they were divided, which I might as well play
that now since I referenced earlier.
- So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
- Yeah, sure. He deliberately
and systematically even, even told on record, whoever wants
to avoid the threat
of a two state solution has to support my policy
of paying protection money to the Hamas.
So what we did, uh, with the permission
of our prime Minister is to let Qatar,
to transfer a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1.4 billion By
doing it, we increased the power of Hamas.
We did everything in order to make sure
that Hamas will go on controlling Gaza
and Palestinian authority will control the West Bank,
so they will fight each other
- Pretty clear.
I know you've seen that a lot, but I think it's always
important to make sure we see.
And it says Israel after this introduced an incrementally
tightening economic blockade.
Yeah, surprise, surprise.
It wasn't happening just October 7th forward.
It's been ongoing, which is why they're food insecure
and why they don't have what they need.
It closed ports of entry banned the importation
of nearly everything that would have allowed Goins to live
above the sustenance level.
Egypt. It co it cooperated, which is important to remember,
which it arguably says that it regrets,
but I who knows, it's up for you to decide that.
Arguably they say they regret it,
but that's arguably that they'd mean that.
But think about that. You can't make these arguments
that they were somehow living this.
It's clear that this was already suffering them.
They making them suffer. This
was already shutting them down.
It was deliberately making sure they did not get
what they needed to survive.
This is after Israel introduced the blockade,
smuggling became Gaza's alternative through the tunnels.
Under Rafa specifically came everything from building
materials to food and medicine
and clothing from fuel to computers to livestock and cars.
And yes, Hamas smuggled the weapons, which again, at
that point you have to really ask yourself whether they were
even smuggling over these deliveries from Israel, seeing as
how they were funding them to power at that point, right?
But either way, the point is recognize
that this wasn't just some dangerous terror tunnel, which
by the way is why they call it that.
Let's not, let's not forget
that tunnels under shefa were built by Israel.
That's a verifiable fact that Barack himself admitted
and we can prove even CNN brought that out.
The point is, these were largely clearly about
surviving, bringing in food and, and,
and even things for, for pleasure for you know, TV
or whatever things that gave them some kind of semblance
of normalcy and they hated that clearly.
I mean the point, my point is the average person
who wants Palestinians to suffer, I still argue
that from a level of power at the government,
they were making sure that this kind
of illegal system was taking place
for the very reason we're seeing today.
So they can turn around and say,
look, they're all criminals.
The tunnels supplied the government
with all the materials used in public work projects.
Well, again, the point about the criminals,
the whole game is to make sure you think
that they're all bad guys.
Which is why if Hamas
and power forced them to live normal lives
through Hamas' administration, whether they wanted to
or not, then you look back
and go look, there's a card that says
Hamas, they're all terrorists.
That's a manufactured illusion just like this.
But it says the tunnels,
the the tunnels supply the government
with all the materials used in public work projects,
which means that Israel make sure they didn't get any of
that, which proves so many points we've made in the past.
And it says Hamas taxes, everything that comes through them,
which I don't know if it's the same
today, but it wouldn't surprise me.
These are people that are like any other group able
of profiteering and opportunism and whatever else.
But remember at that time they were put in
power by Israel guys.
They were funded, they were handed billions of dollars.
So the question then becomes, is this that problem then
that may have been changed today,
doesn't really make change the point for today.
The point is they tax what came through
shutting down operators who didn't pay up.
Tunnel revenue is estimated to provide Hamas with as much
as seven $50 million a year.
So the reality of what Israel did created a revenue stream
for the group that they claim they're trying to stop.
I don't think that's by accident.
Hamas has also smuggled in cash from exiled leaders
and patrons in Syria, Iran,
and Qatar that helps them stay afloat.
There is where it's important
to bring that one back into play.
To remember that the group
that sent it from Qatar was Israel.
Okay? You see how that all works?
So this is all the way back then.
They urged Qatar to continue the financial aid. Okay?
So the point is that if they were smuggling in cash,
they were that Israel was one of them.
So it's very easy to see how this overlaps
with the influence from what Israel wanted to happen.
Now it says in 2010,
after Israeli naval commandos again, all that was
before what we just read in 2010,
the Israeli naval commandos attacked a Turkish float,
flotilla, which we've talked about in the past,
actually off the coast of Gaza to international outrage.
Imagine being outraged about that
and not what's going on in Gaza right now.
Israel said it had relaxed the blockade,
but today there is still only one ill-equipped
access point for goods.
So it didn't, they lied.
Whereas the West Bank has more, many more.
Israel makes it extremely.
And again, this is an article from a wa this
is an article that was posted.
So you have the understanding of when this, the context was
for this, um, where was it?
20, 20 12. So it's a long time ago. Just make sure.
So the context, a lot has changed since then.
So this talking about the West Bank having more,
that's probably changed as well.
Israel makes it extremely difficult and expensive for RA
and other eight agencies.
The source of life and livelihood for thousands
of the 1.6 million at the time, Goins
to import basic materials
for rebuilding projects like machinery, fuel, cement, rebar.
Is that because of Hamas attack on October 7th?
No, it's because they were suffering.
I keep saying that they were making
the Palestinian people suffer.
It takes a special kind of willful ignorance
to not acknowledge that this wasn't just
because of October 7th.
This is obvious.
And RA was a group that was already under attack
because of the right of return
because they were trying to hide what their real job was,
which was maintaining the documents around their right
to return, which means they have a right to go back
to their original place that Israel's occupying.
Now it says it was impossible
to meet basic needs back in 2000.
Uh, what was it again when this is being written at 2010
ba impossible to meet basic needs.
So this is before what we're dealing with now.
And they were getting at least throughout this process
to today, 500 average a day trucks with fuel and few
and food and even back then impossible to meet basic needs.
Said the official insisting that the Shar
or Siege on Gaza's call as Gaza's call it was crippling them
because it was, that was designed to even some
of Israel's oldest supporters.
Agreed. Here's what's even more interesting.
Guess who said this? Prime minister David, uh,
at the time Prime Minister David Cameron lamented
that under the blockade Gaza had come
to resemble a prison camp.
Funny how their narratives change as they get pressured
by Zionist influence over the years, right?
This goes on to say we emerged from the market
and an expanse of white
taral intenses roofs opened up before us.
Now they're basically walking out to
where they say all these tunnels are, and every, they tend,
they said they had a tunnel under it.
They said it stretched under the border walls
in both directions.
It's important. Tents
after tent as far as the eye could see
beneath each was a tunnel they claim,
and we're gonna pretend like this wasn't allowed.
They were all in the, so-called Philadelphia route,
the patrol zone created by the Israeli military as part
of the 1979 Egypt Israel Peace Treaty.
All were in full view
of Egyptian surveillance towers and sniper nests.
So we're gonna pretend like
they don't know that they're there.
This was a, an loud smuggling dynamic
that occasionally was bombed and hurt
and, you know, to make it, this is what I believe it says,
unable to hide my astonishment rights.
I exclaimed that no to no one in particular.
This must be the biggest smuggling operation on earth.
He says there, we met Mohammed, a man in his fifties,
or mamo, excuse me, who used to work on a farm in Israel.
He lost his job when the border
was closed during the second in def.
So he and a group of partners pooled their savings
and in 2006 they started digging
and a year later they had a tunnel.
Now, this is not about terrorism,
it's about making money to survive.
And, and most of this is about smuggling in food and,
and supplies and medicine.
Not, not even not as Hamas, it's average Palestinians.
That's what this really shows you.
This is fascinating to me.
I didn't even know how much of this, I didn't know a lot
of this before I read this on this day.
Boxes of clothing, mobile phones,
sugar detergent were coming in the day before.
It had been tons of flour.
Wheat malamud earned anywhere from several hundred
to a few thousand dollars a shipment
depending on what he brought in.
Like many tunnel operators, he made enough
to keep his tunnel open
and support his family, but not much more.
You see what we're talking about. This is not the, the game
that this is all terror tunnels is insulting.
Now, does that also include that he was working
with people like Hamas to bring weapons in?
I probably ha probably some of them at the very least,
if not all of them, but realize
that this was a group put in power by Israel
to maintain this and allowed all of this to continue.
It says another operator.
Operator showed me a video on his mobile phone
of three skinny young men lying dead on gurneys.
They were his cousins. He
said, who had worked in his tunnel.
He asked why they had no contusions or broken limbs.
He said they were gassed according to some Palestinians,
when Egypt has been pressed by Israel
to cut down on smuggling, which
to me seems like a flimsy illusion.
But either way it says its troops have occasionally poisoned
the air in tunnels by pumping in gas.
Egypt of course, denied this. How interesting.
Remember we just talked about the young kid
who got spreed in
that smoke from Israel and never been the same.
This, it's not a new thing guys.
They're using chemical
and biological weapons, I'm sure of it.
But it says, hey, at a tunnel nearby, we saw a shipment
of potato chips arrive, right?
Terror, potato chips at another mango juice at another coils
of rebar at another,
the familiar blue canisters of cooking gas.
We reached one tunnel at 300 dripping styrofoam boxes full
of fish packed in ice.
Were being unloaded. My god,
this is not some kind of smuggling operation.
This is a delivery route, guys.
You're gonna deliver boxes of fish.
I mean clearly you can smuggle anything.
My point is this seems like an obvious,
well, I've already made the point.
It's obvious this is not what it looks like.
And I think Israel was involved with this at some point.
At the very least, the partners
who ran this tunnel were young in their thirties,
and I shouldn't say involved more I
that's up in the air, I would say.
But I think allowance is my point.
They specialized in lambs
and calves, literally bringing
through cattle and, and, and livestock.
I mean they said, but fish was cheaper.
And since GA
and fishermen, this is important,
were kept within a tight nautical limit
by these Israeli navy, which is a commit.
It's a war crime or other international
violation of national law.
Seafood was always in demand.
Remember, they arbitrarily change the level they can fish
at, which is a crime and shoot them if they go past a level
they don't know that's set.
But it says yet, as for the majority of Gaza's,
the tunnels remain a lifeline.
The in one day in, in Rafa, he says they met a man
who was digging a well with the help
of his two sons using a horse in place of a winch.
I asked him if he worried about his son's safety.
He said, yes, of course, but he had no other job prospects
and couldn't afford to keep his sons in school fixing me
with a skeptical look that suggested all the di all the
distance in the world between us.
He said, currently insa, which is an Arabic translation.
That means that's, that's life. This is the reality, right?
For most of these people, they don't have a choice.
And now when they look back, they look at people like this
and they say, you're a terrorist manufactured
alongside the tunnel economy is another born of destruction.
The UN estimates that operation cast, lead, cast, lead,
cast, lead, thanks, cast lead I think.
But you got, I forget, but this is an Israeli operation
that caused a lot of death in Gaza.
Created more than half a million tons of rubble.
Now think about this in the context of right now,
this is not even new.
Half a million tons of rubble, more than that now for sure,
which has become a currency in its own right now remember
they were already shipping off this rubble
to build the pier rubble that was full of dead bodies
that you could see as they drove by
with hands laying out of the rubble.
That's how horrible the situation is.
Israel didn't care,
but it became a currency in its own right back in 2010.
And it's everywhere and, and it says,
and the rubble collectors are usually teams
of children wielding mallets and hammers
and breaking down the stuff, sifting it,
loading it into donkey carts
and assuming they're gonna get bombed by Israel
and bringing it to one
of the many concrete block factories that have sprung up.
You see, this is the resilience of the Palestinians.
They destroy your entire world. So what do you do?
You make an industry outta the things that they destroyed.
This is the kind of thing that you need to highlight.
This is, this is how gazen unable
to legally import construction materials despite Israel,
lying about that to this day are rebuilding.
A government economist told this person
that the rubble alone accounted
for a 6% drop in unemployment in 2010.
Lastly, again, the point,
so taking all this into constant all into context.
The the point about what they're highlighting here,
oh, I just, I'll use the picture.
So a handful of rockets, of course I'll read the full.
This is the economy of destruction takes on permutations
that might have pleased th most.
The third I'm not familiar with,
there's probably some historical reference.
One night Paulo and I attacked, attended a wedding.
He said celebrating, celebrate a celebration
that took place in a bomb crater.
Probably hard to find a spot that's not,
it also takes ugly turns.
He says, according to an interview
in an international crisis group report, it says A handful
of rockets are in launched by young militants who are hired
by these local merchants whose profits would decline if the
closure Israel had in place.
Were further relaxed.
So that means they're popping off rockets, not
because they're fighting but for freedom.
You know the point in these cases. But
because they're being paid to which
that means we should question who these
militants are at this time.
Remember this is Hamas who is working for Israel
or at least put in place by Israel.
I guarantee you there are influential parts in this.
People that are in fact influenced
or working for somebody else.
And then the merchants themselves who are somehow allowed
to maintain this massive smuggling operation in full view
of God, of Egypt and their snipers
and Israel as well hardly.
I think what we're seeing is the illusion
and that they're popping these rockets off
and Netanyahu's all too happy to go, oh, look at
how bad they are here.
We're gonna have to defend ourselves.
And local merchants are maintaining
their smuggling operation.
Many of them just, just to survive.
I think this is hugely important.
You tell me what you think.
Now let's talk about some important current realities
and we'll get into the food ICC
and the campus protest trying to hurry.
I only have about an hour to get done.
So us all broad points out,
this is Rafa right now the Biden administration will say
it's a limited operation
because they already expressed opposition
to a quote major operation, which is just a shell.
It's a, it's an illusion. The media will repeat this
and say this in addressing the US concerns
just to keep the lie going.
It's how propaganda works.
Here is what a supposed limited operation looks
and sounds like
there is limited and this goes on,
- Realize - This
- One after another.
- That's their life limited operation.
Oh, and so the point here is that, so here's,
we're talking about this ongoing just annihilation campaign
in, by the way, Rafa the safe zone apparently where most
of these people are suffering, staying
and that they claim well now we have to
because well Hamas is there, which is
by the way why they're pushing this idea
of the supposedly loaded
and ready rocket launchers, which I,
I should have addressed that at the end of that point.
Which by the way were not loaded
and clearly to me looked like they were
there from a long time ago.
And that was the point here that these are obviously,
at least in some cases they're being used right in the open,
right along the fence
to pop off a rocket which they can point at which they like
as well because it keeps the closure going on
and everybody keeps making money, right?
So now they spin back around just like the Shefa tunnels
that they built and they go look a rocket thing.
That's how we know Rafal terrorists.
That is how this works, okay?
And I think the point is that they're using this
to pretend they can just bomb all of Rafa now
or at least hope that works,
but it's not, people are seeing right through this.
So my point is this, they're saying they're going
after only Hamas, right?
Isn't that the game that's being played?
Don't forget that they claim that they put the strength
of Hamas at about 30,000 fighters.
Who knows if we can prove it the point,
probably less than that as far as I'm concerned.
But nonetheless they say that's what they're going after.
And again, don't forget that Palestinians la Jihad I think
has somewhere like a hundred thousand
or a hell of a lot more, at least as I understand it.
So I, as I've said many times
that will be the shifting focus if the moment they think
Hamas is no longer working or gone, let's say.
But in any case, 30,000, right?
Well here's what just came out yesterday.
US intelligence indicates only 30 to 35%
of homos fighters have been killed.
65% of tunnels are intact.
Okay, let's just take the number first, okay?
Let's just pretend this is accurate.
So let's just give 35% even take the lower estimate
of currently death toll today being 35,800 Palestinians.
If we are to believe, right?
If we're to believe and take this number at face value that
that is 35%
or within that number is 35% of Hamas.
Well let's just do some simple math here.
35% that comes out.
So basically we're talking about 10,500 out of the,
the number they're putting forward 30,000, right?
So that means when you take it away from the 38,000 number
that ends up with 25,300 innocent people killed,
that's according to us intelligence statements.
Now. So if they're telling us that it's okay
that they've killed 10,500 Hamas members,
but twice, three times as many civilians in the process,
doesn't that shock people?
I mean I, I don't understand why they don't realize why
that's alarming or maybe they do
and this is some kind of a last ditch effort.
But realize that what they just said here, this right here
acknowledges, and guys, I don't believe that for a second,
I haven't seen a single example of a Hamas member,
which again, I don't think is true.
I I find that impossible actually.
But I mean unless this is a massive illusion coordination,
not the killing, but the idea that Hamas is part of the,
I don't know, but in any case, 30
to 35% then proves if you believe that number that it,
the vast majority have been
civilians, which we already know.
Well that's just being stated now, apparently
now talking about the people that are suffering,
both the people in Gaza
but also the hostages that are still there who are starving
and being bombed just like everybody else,
we were just talking about this on May 22nd,
men cho sit points out
to the US supply is the US supplying arms
to the Israeli forces in Gaza via the port, the pier,
the temporary pier, which I highly doubt is temporary.
And he goes over a really great breakdown here,
quite frankly I think it's obvious that you could see
that he breaks down all the information.
He's just being objective in the stating of the,
of the opening of it, right?
You can rock check out this threat for yourself.
I said, I was just talking about
how the US government would still deliver weapons
through other unseen channels even if they publicly declared
an actual halt.
Not the fake one we just saw by the way
to arms deliveries and here we are.
What does this say about the two party illusion show
that we're given how Brian mask
and we're gonna, I put forward legislation to you know,
whatever he said to go after Biden
for not doing this or force 'em to do it.
So either they actually don't even understand what's really
going on within their own policy
or he knows that they're both going forward with it anyway.
He knows Biden's secretly doing it anyway
and just wants to put on a show.
That's probably more the likely reality.
That's all a big political show.
They all support it, they all support war.
But it's very clear when you really break this down,
am I pla put plaid put, put a
great post unfortunately on Twitter ,
I don't rather they write this on my platform
or anywhere else, but it simply goes through
and you can, you can read all it's a great breakdown
but you can see what they're showing you.
I mean these, these are, these are weapons guys.
They've, they've brought in weapons on the pier,
not a single food item that I can see.
It's shockingly obvious. So they're bringing a weapons.
So the point is this is not for the interest of Godins even.
Are you gonna pretend this is to secure the pier?
How long has this been capable
of bringing things in and not food?
No food, aren't you the ones telling us they're starving.
I mean it 'cause they are that this is not what it's about
and this gets even worse
or better depending on what you're look you know better in
the context of how clearly they're being exposed.
This is the article from CNN Pentagon says none, zero,
none of the aid unloaded from the US pier off coast
of Gaza has been delivered to
broader Palestinian population.
Now as far as I can see, I haven't even seen stuff
that's been truly unloaded.
I've seen things like this but I don't know what's in those,
I don't know what's actually going on in my opinion.
All I've seen translated to
what we can prove are things like the weapons, personnel,
that kind of stuff, but they're claiming
that they've unloaded a bunch of stuff from the pier even.
But the point is, even though that they claim
that's happened, the Pentagon has spoken up
and said they're unloading it
but they haven't chose to deliver it.
And this is exactly what you well know.
I called out like anybody who was honest did I said gee
who didn't see that coming?
Do you remember when we told you that this would happen?
Because Israel was in charge of processing the aid.
I mean it's a 1, 2, 3 reality guys.
They were the ones stopping eight over here.
The US made the pier to claim they could go
around whatever blockages were happening.
It was Israel's fault but then made sure Israel
was in charge of processing.
It's not hard to recognize.
I said get ready for Elon Levy screeching about
how they have delivered more aid
through the pier than anyone in history.
Which guess what? He proved me
right today and I'll show you.
But here's what's crazy Koga, you know the group
who we've repeatedly called out
for lying about aid even though in their own bio it says
that one of their main jobs is is coordinating humanitarian
aid, which is pretty disgusting.
This this person is executive director at a legal center
for movement of freedom
who highlights koga is literally dumping goods
on Israeli side of the Kareem Shalom crossing, right?
Which can't be reached without Israel's coordination
and then mocks the international organizations
that can't reach the goods
because of a lack of coordination
during a humanitarian catastrophe.
This is a manufactured illusion and a bad one
and you could look at their own tweets.
Remarkably other humanitarian NGOs in the private sector
have been bringing in food trucks.
They're admitting that they've done this then
otherwise going look, they're not even grabbing it
because they won't let them.
And you realize even the un,
the world food program is an extension of it.
They've called these things out, it's public.
Even the US has kind of tacitly admitted it,
but they're just cowards at this point.
The US government and they're not gonna do it.
Not really, but here's what I was talking about.
There's two of you. Here's Elon Levy, this is from 21st.
He says on October 7th the the October 7th war
is fundamentally about one question.
Do facts matter in the world anymore ,
you know like clearly coming from the group
that's been caught lying more than anyone.
I mean at this point, even more than
what we saw in the Ukraine war, which is still going,
but the lie we saw were just constant.
I think we've seen more in this.
It's hard to tell actually,
but he says nobody can look at the Herculean efforts.
That's what he says. Herculean efforts Israel has made
to get aid into enemy tailed territory.
, you mean the group that you
paid to make sure was in charge.
You guys are lost in your own lies under fire,
which means you're talking about the people you are shooting
at, they're not shooting at you
as best we can prove in regard to the aid and accused of it.
Genocide or starvation,
you mean the things you're openly doing.
But the point Herculean efforts, while everyone
with any standing in this conversation has been highlighting
the fact that you have made sure A doesn't get through
and we'll prove it yet again today.
But here's what he highlights. KGA showing you this
ridiculous breakdown, okay,
they say 29,746 trucks.
This has only gotten worse since the first time we did this
here at out on the notepad right here, here.
So it's been 229 days divided that
by 29,746 you get 129.8, 130,
rounding up being generous, 130 trucks a day.
Now realize that we don't even know what's in there.
So at the end of the day it might not even be
mostly food but it should be.
The point is it doesn't matter.
That is shockingly lower than any time
before this 500 a day with fuel was the average
before October 7th
and we just showed you they were shockingly
insecure because they were s even.
Even while they're smuggling things in,
they're still starving,
I should say more specifically food insecure.
But down here he makes the most important lie
or Colgate does that he backs up, they claim on the 20th
of this month that they sent through 403 trucks, which
by the way wouldn't even be a positive thing
because that's a hundred less than what they were getting
before, which even then they were still food insecure.
So 400 now would guarantee people would go starving.
That's how that works guys
because they were already not getting enough
and some of them might get enough
or some of 'em might get some, but it guarantees a slow
drip into starvation and we're already there.
Everyone with any standing on this is called it famine.
Even the groups that met who use create the metrics of
what famine is, propaganda
and co always on 'em saying no one
believes your garbage propaganda.
Well let's prove it right? Here's what the UN is saying.
Well of course they're gonna say UN is is Hamas, whatever,
which is just falling on deaf ears this point
'cause it's ridiculous, it's childish.
This is the newest, this is as of yesterday.
Look at the numbers. Okay? Again, first of all,
if you haven't seen this, the pre-crisis average was 500
trucks including fuel a day.
You can also see that the dark blue is daily average,
the light blue is daily.
Total light blue only comes into play when
they're doing the individuals.
These are all per week
for those that are watching the video.
Take note that not a single one goes over 500,
not once, not this whole time.
And in fact they've actually seen some
of these get downgraded because
I think they got better information.
In any case, the point is shockingly low
and they started out with almost three weeks
of nothing kick-starting a famine
and then slowly dripped it in,
which then slowly continues the famine.
That's what's happening. 500 down
to 200 at best is guaranteeing people starve
and realize the only reason they need this is
because of the refugee status.
Because they've never allowed people to go back to
where they came from and they're living in refugee camps
and they, and then on top of that, in Gaza in particular,
they're making sure they don't get what they need
because there's been a blockade long before October 7th.
But here's the point. Guess what he said about, remember
what he said about the 20th 34 trucks came through, I argued
that they weren't even because of Israel.
Either way, 34 all said
and done on the 20th, 29 before that, 27,
before that five, the day before that,
and then five average a day from the 10th
to the 16th right now from yesterday,
or rather the 21st, it's zero, which I've noticed that some
of these can trickle up afterward,
but it's pretty low is my point.
But that not, not the 20th.
That may be like the days before, like probably once you get
the next one tomorrow, there might be a little bit on the
21st, but usually you see
that going up right now the 20th is where we're at, 34th.
That's it. He's lying guys, which not that shocking.
He's been caught lying a million times.
But think about how disgusting that is
to lie from the group claiming to, to facilitate the sa,
the thing that you're pretending.
It's just villainy guys, it's villainy, it's disgusting.
Keep a track of this page
and if for some reason I can't find the place
where it updates what I do, just to show you, scroll
to the end, update the number.
That's 229 days right now.
Let's see if even the 30th has come up yet.
I did it earlier, but it wasn't ready.
Yeah, okay, so the 30th is not yet, not there
yet, but it will be.
So save the link, you know, update that number at the end
and you can go along with the days
or go all the way back to the beginning.
It's not hard to see.
Now here's what he said, proving my point.
He said this today, Israel doesn't have a policy
of starvation and Gaza, he doesn't policy of flooding Gaza
with aid despite Gaza flooding Israel with terrorists.
It's didn't, I literally said he would do this
Flooding Gaza with aid.
I mean for crying out loud, you can't,
you could at least argue they're giving some,
but even that I think is a lie.
But this, you know, I look, he was publicly fired,
but who knows if he's just doing his job still
because he's supposed to be
and they, they wanted to have him removed either way.
This is such a shocking lie, right In the face
of everything, this guy more than most
is complicit in genocide.
Now here is an interesting overlap from these.
One of the, you know, little, little Mikey rap report he
highlights, this is an interesting overlap.
Remember when we, when he was supposedly caught
or did some little skit in the hallway
where he was going like, yes, I want more money
for when I do this and that, supposedly speaking with Israel
or somebody representing them,
my first gut instinct was clearly that wasn't real.
I mean, who's dumb enough to talk in the hallway
right out in the hall in the hotel?
You know, I, who knows something the way it went forward.
Maybe wonder maybe it really was, maybe he just is
that stupid, but overall it was hard to believe.
But what I've noticed him do over
and over is things like this where he, what appears to,
I mean by the way, he really
does look pretty sickly right there.
I said that down there, but I can clearly see that he
gets caught doing really dumb things
or in this case, either just mishears
what was going on or whatever.
Maybe this is an example of what I'm about to say
after the fact, but he, in many cases
you'll see what I mean mean by that.
He says the wrong thing or he misreads something
or he just shares as we showed you earlier,
completely fake news
and then instead of acknowledging it, he goes on like a run
of doing it on purpose.
I think it's a kind of a childish way of trying to,
and like he's a, you know, supposedly a comedian of trying
to make it look like it was all a shtick.
It doesn't work for me. I think he's getting caught
and I think it's really bad coverup,
but I'll show you what I mean.
So here's a video he put out.
This is a guy, uh, CNNI think talking with Ben ben net.
Benjamin Netanya. I'll let it play for itself
and then we'll engage with what he said.
- I wanna bring in the prime minister right now. Mr.
Prime Minister, thank you very much
for joining us this morning.
You've been accused of using starvation as a weapon of war.
I know you've called that decision.
- Oh by the way, I forgot about that.
, I love the way the delay worked here.
So he goes, you, you've been achi accused of starvation.
He goes, oh, thank you. Clearly he was saying thank you
to welcome to being here, but watch again.
I love that somebody should
clip that out and make that something. Mr.
- Prime Minister, thank you very much
for joining us this morning.
You've been accused of using starvation as a weapon of war.
I know you've called that decision by the prosecutors.
Outrageous love that the prosecutor
responded to that yesterday.
I want you to listen to what he had to say.
- Israel has every right not to give sucker
to Hamas that is not contested.
Israel has every right
and needed an obligation to get hostages back,
but you must do so by complying with the law.
The fact that Hamas fighters need water
doesn't justify denying water
from all the civilian population of Gaza.
- Your - Response,
- Wait, - I, okay, so
and nobody over the brain understands the logic.
Just because Hamas might use the water is no reason
to not supply water to all of the innocent people, which
by the way, that's collective punishment,
which we told you at some level, if there's any ju justice
or honesty, it's easy to prove.
Just because they scream something else doesn't change
that reality, right?
You, whether it's human
shields, whatever, they're still doing it.
It's a crime no matter what. Here's how he respond.
- I I, I'm sorry, what? What did you say?
Head of the international criminal court,
the Hamas fighters need water, the Hamas,
- Oh, and I'm, I think he cusses here
because he's always crass and crude.
So just be prepared for that.
- Fighters need water and you're saying Israel
should give them water. Nope,
- Didn't say that.
- Fuck the Hamas fighters, they don't get water.
They don't get water, they don't get bread,
they don't get crackers,
they don't get the dog shit off my shoes.
- You get it? You don't need to hear all
of his just ridiculous lowbrow nonsense.
My point, to me that doesn't seem like a shtick.
That's him misinterpreting what he was said there
because I don't think he's that bright.
In any case, whether
or not that was a misinterpretation,
my point is he gets caught lying and then kind of runs.
I'll show you another example next on these tears
of like almost pretending to misinterpret things as a way
to, I think hide the fact that he actually did that.
But in any case, this is what I said.
I said nope, not even remotely what he said.
And yet again, you are either doing your job
of obfuscating facts to maintain genocide
or you are actually this stupid
and locking common basic comprehension skills.
I frankly think it's both. By the way, go see a doctor.
You look pretty sickly , I think.
Hey, you look pretty bad. I don't know what it is.
I'm just looking out for you Mikey.
You might have some liver problem or something,
but here is what somebody else said.
He says he was suggesting that just
because some moss fighters need water does not mean,
you know, somebody who understands logic
or comprehension does not mean giving,
not giving water to Palestinians.
And he goes, I know exactly what he was suggesting
and I'm suggesting Hamas gets nothing.
So okay, tripling, doubling down.
What you're acknowledging is
that you're then saying, I know what he meant.
And I'm saying they should all go die of thirst
because Hamas shouldn't get anything.
Well, okay, there's only two ways to take that.
So either way he's pretty disgusting.
But here's my point about the follow up.
Here's another example. Now you could argue that he's just,
yet again, again misinterpreting what's being said,
but I kind of find it hard to believe.
Here's un ra saying As a result
of the ongoing military operation in Eastern Rafa,
the ongoing bombing campaign
of innocent people in Rafa RA distribution center
and the World Food Program warehouse,
both in Rafa are now inaccessible now by choice
because of the bombing of Israel.
It says food distributions in Rafa,
Southern Gaza are currently suspended due to a lack
of supplies and insecurity.
So one, they don't have the food they need
because Israel's blocking it
and not letting it go anywhere then they can't get
shot at when they try.
Pretty simple. Here's how we frame it.
Unre admits to pur to purposely
and knowingly starving the people of Gaza .
Now I actually think that this was sort of like a same kind
of thing I'm talking about like she calls it out right here.
Are you trying to make some kind
of point about putting incorrect spin on words or something?
Because that's obviously not what this says at all,
and I think other people picking up on it.
So my opinion is one of two things.
Either he's doing a job of like willfully trying
to just spread the disinformation, like just
to clumsy up the conversation.
Or he is actually misreading that or he is doing it because,
or I guess three things because he wants
to make it look like it's all some kind
of a stick either way, this is the level
of Israeli propaganda, even from people officially
part of the Israeli government.
Now here, Arran highlights exactly
what we can prove is continuing to happen.
As he says here, watching this,
this settler literally almost dive in front of,
he's literally standing in front of a food truck
or a humanitarian aid delivery truck
and he says, imagine picking this as a cause.
You're ready to die for blocking humanitarian
aid to starving people.
Hard to recall any other instance in history when a society
had descended into such collective murderous madness.
Well said. And even worse
or better, depending how you look at it, Israeli soldiers,
according to the Guardian and police tipping off groups
that attack Gazen a trucks, don't forget,
they just attacked, dragged a guy outta the truck
that was not an aid delivery guy, just
because he was Palestinian,
he was delivering something completely different,
had nothing to do with Gazen aid and they beat him up
and he's in, he's in a hospital bed right now.
Nobody cared about that 'cause these settlers are
getting away with everything.
Rape, murder, burning down crops, homes.
I'll show you some examples right now,
but this is even from The Guardian as of two days ago.
This the, that's this, the way
to put it is this is institutional.
This is from the Israeli soldiers and police
and government pers uh, level where they are facilitating,
promoting and driving this into reality
that's been proven 14 times over.
Another example of Mike y Apo Unre says,
it's not a technical issue to get people fed.
It's a political issue, unfortunately, yet again,
in the midst of this politics, it's the people of Gaza
who continue to suffer Unre.
Sam Rose tells, uh, what's this? RTE is RTE.
I'm not familiar. That aid needs to desperately get in.
He says, this is crazy to me.
He says, has one adult in Gaza had any complications due
to not eating, let alone died?
That's crazy. An American Viking says,
this is a weird tweet.
So you're admitting children are dying
and you think that argument is good morally bankrupt.
I mean, think about this. He's so just
because let's just say he's even right, which is not just
because it's not an adult that hasn't done.
So you acknowledge children have been
starving and that's okay to you.
Wow, man. I mean, I, I, this is the kind of thing
that we need to really take note of,
and this is when we're all talking about society shunning,
like this is where I think we're,
you know, free speech is free speech.
You can say what you believe,
but this is where society steps in
and acknowledges that you are not part of it.
You are the anomaly, you are the disgusting extreme level of
what we're supposed to box out people
that will allow this from hap to happen.
Now, the times of India highlights
that Netanyahu said the same thing,
which is probably where he picked up the talking point.
Netanyahu literally just said on the 22nd,
or at least it was reported on the 22nd,
more deaths from starvation are happening in the
United States than in Gaza.
Now look, there's only one
or two ways to put this, that he's using some kind
of a statistical overlap knowing
that there's countless more people in the,
in the United States, which I still don't believe,
or he's knowingly lying about this.
In any case, it's such an obvious sidestep from
what we all know is happening.
Here's from April last month,
Gaza could surpass famine threshold in six
weeks and we're already there.
They're all telling you this is surpassed famine.
Now, Jeffrey Meade, I'm not even sure why he's so
hell bent on lying about Israel right now or for Israel.
He says, Benjamin Netanyahu today, quote,
we are supplying now nearly half the water of Gaza.
We supplied only 7% before the war .
I don't even know where. I mean, the point is they have been
suppressing the flow of everything into Gaza since
as far back as you can look.
So I mean really since the beginning of the occupation.
And so I guarantee this is about a manipulation saying,
so let's, so before the war,
we were making sure they only got this much
and that only that somehow happened to be 7% of
what they were finding elsewhere, right?
Today we've stopped everything.
Like, so let's say before this, they were giving,
they were somehow gaining, you know, a hundred gallons
of water just making up a number and they only gave 7%,
which is probably grudgingly, if that's even true.
And it's all unsanitary.
98% of it you can't even drink according
to all of the international bodies.
But let's just say afterward, all that went away
and Israel was delivering one gallon a day,
and that happened to be half of two gallons.
They got every day, see how numbers can lie to you?
So they go, 50% is coming from us.
Well, okay, how much were they getting then?
And how much are they getting now? The point is people are
literally dying with without water and food
and he's over here acting
like they're giving them everything they need.
It's just like Elon Levy. It is a lie.
And I said, well, by the way, Netanyahu also publicly
and repeatedly stated he wanted a two-state solution,
which was also a lie.
Yes, a guy, the guy is a liar,
but I guess that self-evident reality
is a bit too complex for you.
And I just highlighted him saying that we want
to hump support Hamas
to stop the thing he claimed he wanted.
Matt Lieb, I'll show this just as a,
you know, you can watch this for yourself.
We've gone over most of this, highlights an important
reality in the food aid conversation.
He goes, I've been keeping track
of the Hamas doing this in quotes, the idea
of the stealing aid trucks.
He goes, so let's do a side-by-side comparison
of Israelis and Hamas videos.
He goes, here's a video shared
by Pro Israel accounts with the caption.
Hamas shoots its civilians for getting near aid trucks.
His overall point here, guys, you watch the video,
you could definitely hear some shots,
but what you don't see is any shooting certainly could be.
But his point is that all you see,
and there's a bunch of examples, are people with guns.
I don't know how, why you can prove they're Hamas
who are guarding aid trucks, which by the way was always
what has been happening, whether they're police
or Hamas or whatever else.
And in fact, that's the job they're supposed to be doing
and they get shot for doing it,
which we've highlighted recently.
The point is, he's convinced that these are
gunshots put over the top of the video,
but at the very least, you can't see any actual shooting.
You just see people riding along with the trucks.
The trucks aren't stopping,
they aren't being hijacked anywhere.
They seem to be on the
way to where they're supposed to be going.
Hmm, interesting. Okay. And he
goes, well, let's contrast that.
Here is what you see with the Israeli videos.
Remember this, where they're stomping on the food
and throwing it off the trucks and beating up.
They even laughed and beat up a woman trying to stop it.
Who was an Israeli Jew? Interesting.
Okay, here's another one. Same point he makes.
Here's a supposed video where they say, Hamas takes over it.
And the only reason that's the, the implication is
because the caption aside from that,
all you really see are people you can't even see.
This is super far away.
You just see people on top of trucks delivering them.
They're playing on the ignorance of the average person.
Same thing here. Here's when Israel's doing it.
That's pretty obvious. They're
dumping the flower on the ground.
Here's another one that's supposed to be Hamas hijacking.
And he goes, this is the same thing here.
Here's what he set up here. Here's another video.
Or at least that's what the caption says, this one.
So here you go. You got a video with a guy with a gun.
That's it. It's not stopping. They're driving by.
So you have a guy guarding the aid.
Certainly could be Hamas.
And here's pro Israel counts Again, blocking aid coming
through, openly chanting that being supported by Mossad.
Right? Thanks to all came out. I showed you this one.
Thank you everybody for coming out
to block aid to starving people.
Excuse me. He then says Hamas video again.
He goes, the narrative is set by the caption.
Hamas is supposed to have hijacked the truck.
We, but there's no shooting nothing.
He says, all we, but we never see
them doing that in any of the videos.
They just seem to be riding on the trucks.
Look, this is a vest on to me,
this looks like people protecting the aid.
And don't forget, as even Robert has covered,
they've stopped wearing official guard
because they know they're gonna get shot
at, but they get shot at anyway.
'cause they're shooting everybody. This is Ollie London, one
of these most egregious mis liars about this whole
conversation from the very beginning.
Again, Israel dumping all the aid.
Again, same thing here, over and over and over.
The evidence is unle. Unbelievable.
So I think this is so
obvious how we've been played about this.
Now, just a quick point on Ra Rami a uh, uh, Yara points out
that they've launched a massive initiative to protect,
to provide political support
to RA at the UN multiple entities.
Jordan Kuwait, and this was, uh, Slovenia.
They shared commitments on RA says will address several
aspects of RA's role in Gaza
and for the regional stability to its financial.
Um, where I just lost the place, uh, where was it?
To, to for its regional stability
and its financial crisis questions related
to the principles of neutrality.
Basically saying, we're gonna support them
against what Israel's doing to them.
Right? And this is important
because they're standing up, other countries
are standing up and pushing back.
And it says, here's the shared commitments that, that
to Unre, which will be sent around midday today.
And this was on the 22nd. So you can read 'em for yourself.
Like it's, it's exactly the opposite of what you,
the Israeli government is pushing.
Now, on top of that, we have an example
that came out yesterday where the idea f apparently struck
another Hamas
or Unre school that they're claiming was Hamas.
There's nothing to back it up other than the fact
that they said, so here's
how this was interestingly reported alongside the report
that they bombed a school, which by the way used
to be a big deal still is they just don't talk about it in
the gov in the political sphere.
It says, well, they they bombed this area
claiming there were Hamas members there.
But then it says, the operation
also aimed to destroy weapons.
And it says, this action was followed by a raid
by Israeli forces in the West Bank, city of Janine.
Oh, interesting. West Bank. Okay, well there is no Hamas,
which resulted in the death of eight Palestinians,
including a teacher, a doctor, and two young boys.
August Jews don't, we just don't care about that one. Right.
Rolling in, highlight the all allegation
of Hamas being present somewhere else.
The raid it says, which continued into a second day involved
gunfire, explosions leading
to widespread destructions in the Janine refugee camp.
The international community has responded with condemnation.
Yeah. 'cause they're breaking a law here.
Pelam, this is, I forget her name actually.
The, she's one of the reporters from the ground.
And in Gaza.
Netanyahu has now started,
started a massive offensive in Janine
in the occupied West Bank.
He's now sent more than 1500 IDF soldiers
with tanks and heavy machinery.
Settlers have been burning homes
with children still inside of them.
These have been reported by corporate media
for crying out loud, but
that changed Netanyahu Biden support.
Gianni also highlights the finance minister Smoke Rich has
announced plans to sanction the Palestinian authority.
Interesting. So there's nowhere for them to turn.
Like that's the whole point.
10,000 housing units in the settlements will now be allowed
in the West Bank where it says retaliation measures against
countries that recognized Palestine as a state.
This is crazy. These people are absolute lunatics.
And really quickly, I only have about 20 minutes
left to do the last couple parts.
Here is a quick opening part about this.
They watch the whole 11 minute video
where they're showing you there's been a secret war going on
against the West Bank that nobody other than
independent media wants to highlight.
And I don't mean mainstream alternative media,
I mean the independent media,
- The eyes of the world, quite rightly turned towards Gaza.
A quiet war overseen by extremist
ministers in the Israeli government is being waged against
Palestinians on the occupied West Bank.
Israel insists that it's fighting Hamas,
but in the West Bank, Fata is the leading political party
and Palestinian authorities in charge.
So what is happening in the West Bank is nothing to do with
Hamas and does make this conflict look more like one
between Israel versus Palestinians than Israel versus Hamas.
I've just got back from the West Bank,
having spent best part of a month talking to people
who almost every night were being visited by settlers
who would come in and destroy their cars or beat them up
or often hit their wives.
Their children were traumatized by this.
And the message really was get out or die. It's lawless.
Kind of reminded me of Mad Max two.
If you've seen that nightmare film
and the settlers are a bit like that,
sometimes it might be villages going out
to collect their olives
and a pack of settlers might emerge with M 16 machine guns
and spray bullets around the place to scare 'em off the lab.
Or they use the guns to beat up some of the male villagers
and then shoot the water tanks come in also with bulldozers.
Cars are incinerated.
The houses have been attempts to burn down the houses
or sheep, et cetera,
have been scattered in some cases just shot.
They burnt the olive groves when they come into your house
and they'll smash up your house
and then they will steal through your money
and acts of incredible aggression.
The Israeli authorities just don't do anything about it.
The international community is mute.
When I last looked, 16
of these little village encampments have been erased.
The villagers have found that just impossible to survive.
They've had to leave their land.
And this is of course a, a crime
and, uh, international law, a forcible dispossession of
occupied people from their land
and their replacement by another people brought in
by the occupying power.
And there's no question that these settlers are protected
by the Israeli Defense Force.
It's a tendency for the police to say,
no, no, nothing to do with us.
The police, of course, are under the overalls control
of this electable character.
Mr. pve, heads of the Jewish Power Party settler leader,
very sympathetic to the settler calls.
Hang,
- I'd love to play this whole thing for you early wood,
but I have an interview, I have to join about 20 minutes,
but I I always forget to point that out.
The Jewish Power Party. I mean, it's just so crazy.
Any other, I mean, you know, like the idea was I guess more
so specifically the, you know,
white power is the only one that's supposed to be a problem.
But the idea that historically,
even like the Black Power Party,
these things are always regarded as somehow extreme, right?
But in this context,
we're just not allowed to highlight that.
Or the idea that these people are part
of the religious Zionism party, which even the A DL
and other groups in the past have called Extreme.
They are extreme, but make sure you watch that full video.
It's un it's undeniably clear.
They're waging their own separate war against the West Bank
while almost using the Gaza as a distraction, which is crazy
to think about a distraction of genocide.
But the reality is they're both happening and it's
because it's a war on Palestine.
If we're just wanna be honest about this.
Now, the ICC is a conversation I wanted to make sure we had.
And the idea being we just give you
this link to follow up on.
If you wanna watch our first conversation,
the ICC announcing Warrens, fert and Yahoo, uh, gland
and three people of the leadership of Hamas
that I believe are protected and con influenced
and funded by Israel and Protected
and Qatar, which I cover on that show.
But Ahmad Ab ab Bfao points out
that over a hundred UK prime ministers
and lords from 11 parties have now signed a letter
urging the UK government to support a,
the international criminal court and condemn any threats
and attempts to undermine the independence
and impartiality of the ICC
in its investigations into crimes in
the situation in Palestine.
That's huge. Probably won't change these dedicated Zionist
followers, but it's a big deal
that you're seeing people come out from everywhere,
multiple western countries, a hundred UK prime ministers
and lords are all telling them they have to go along.
Now what they're saying here is Israel's even expecting the
ICJ injunctions to halt this brutal war in Gaza
or to ask for it anyway.
Israel expects the International Court of Justice,
not the ICC, but the World Court, the ICJ to order a halt
to Israel's deadly offensive in Gaza.
According to local media, Israeli legal experts assess
that there's a high probability that'll happen.
It says, he said in court,
the court could either order a secession
of Israeli military assaults in Rafa
or seek to halt the Gaza War through court injunctions.
But it simply says down here that Israel, of course,
responded the way you'd expect
no power on earth will stop Israel from protecting its
citizens, which is not what they're doing.
And going after Hamas,
which is clearly not just what they're doing, if at all.
And this is coming from Avi Haem, the spokesperson,
and it says the reporters they asked to win.
Uh, well that's, that's the statement.
The point is clearly that they're not gonna
listen no matter what.
And we know that. Now, here is
what Lindsey Graham's belligerent,
just belligerents put forward.
I mean, this is the thing they're trying.
I think people like Pompeo and Lindsey Graham
and the rest of them recognize that they are under the lens
of the international community for, for a lot of reasons.
And they're worried that this could come back to them.
Right now, Lindsey Graham probably very clearly
because they're complicit in genocide, Pompeo less
because he's not part of the administration.
But I think that overall, they come from a time both Bolton
and Pompeo, when they recognize
that they're still on the hook for crimes
that were committed along for Afghanistan, Iraq.
I, I don't know if there's a statute of limitations in
that regard, but either way, the point is here he's saying
if they do this, we are next.
It's just this guy's clearly conflating
every American with the crimes of Israel.
Doesn't that bother Americans? But here's what this is.
What's what's actually funny about this is when he says
they're gonna come after us next
they people in the room clap.
- So we hopefully together will find a way to,
uh, rush our displeasure with the ICC.
'cause if they'll do this to Israel, we are next this group.
- Well, maybe you should be next Lindsey Graham,
because you've committed a lot of crimes.
This isn't about of average Americans,
it's about unaccountable power
- Group tried to come after our soldiers.
Yeah, you can clap all you want to.
They tried to come after our soldiers in Afghanistan, but
- 'cause they committed a lot of crimes
that the world is shockingly aware of.
- The reason prevailed.
So at the end of the day here, what I hope to happen is
that we live sanctions against the ICC for this outrage
to not only help our friends in Israel,
but protect ourself over time.
- Yeah. So how do you not read that
as a criminal rack organization?
Protect ourselves over time.
So now you're just taking it on credit
that whatever you do forever is not allowable.
Like that's just crazy. He, he basically admits it.
If you're doing it in perpetuity, that's to suggest
that you'll never commit a crime.
I mean, come on. That's absurd.
These people know that they're criminals, they know this.
And what they're ultimately saying is, we don't ever,
we can't allow this because we could be held accountable.
That's the reality of this.
And I think it's shockingly obvious, whether Afghanistan
or anything else that, remember they threaten the family
members of the ICC.
That's why they ultimately
backed the way I argue at the visa.
They got enough pressure to stop them
- Soldiers in Afghanistan, but reason prevailed.
So at the end of the day here, what I hope to happen is
that we level sanctions against the ICC for this outrage
to not only help our friends in Israel
- And sanctions, so they're ultimately gonna sanction an
international body, which I argue they
don't legally have the right to do.
It's just about threats. And it's only
because of their financial manipulation
that they can arguably do
that without support from the international community.
Now Glen Greenwald highlights his point.
He says, well, the ICC is only bad is is only
for the bad countries, not the US and its allies.
In the 1980s, the US declared itself
outside the ICJs jurisdiction when it ruled in favor
of Nicaragua and the US mining its arbors
and says that's what the rules based international order
means and always meant hypocrisy.
Right? That's,
and remember we already talked about this when we,
he openly now said that they,
a high level official told Kahn at the ICC, this is only,
this court was only made for Africa
and Putin, these people are outright criminals.
He censored news highlights the point we just did point,
we showed the other day that near every US official left
and right seemingly dutifully came out
and pointed to something that nobody said.
Now where do you, how do you think that possibly happens?
They didn't just accidentally all say the same thing.
Guys, it's very alarming that we can see this willingness
to mark lockstep say the same thing at a time when they know
we're calling them out for doing this.
Think about what that means.
There's some clear compromising going on here. All of them.
It's all about the, there's no moral equivalence.
These are all US politicians and US entities
or even specifically the House on Foreign Affairs,
like main accounts of the, for the government.
It's crazy. They simply said a bunch of pro-ISIS,
Israel members of Congress, all using the same talking point
about equivalence, breaking this into
two separate screenshots.
There's more down here. The point is,
nobody anywhere said there was a
moral, any kind of equivalence.
They're just using that as a sidestep point
to remove your focus from the reality
of what's actually happening.
Zachary Foster makes some excellent points.
He says there the, the idea there's no moral
equivalence between amass in Israel.
He goes, well the talking point has been regurgitated
by ad nauseum by the supporters.
And he says, uh, but is moral equivalency argument true?
He says, international humanitarian law boils outta three
principles, no targeting civilians,
no dis indiscriminate attacks, no disproportionality.
And he says, targeting civilians first,
Hamas targeted civilians on October 7th killing
764 civilians.
Israel killed some of those 764
after the Hannibal directive exactly
how money is unknown Israel targeted civilians nearly every
day between October 8th and the present.
Now again, you could take issue with the number,
it's just about making a point in regard to the 7 64 he,
but the point he makes, I think is what I agree,
the ultimate idea that we don't know how many
of those were killed by the IDF,
but he says since that time Israel's killed tens
of thousands of civilians.
Israeli military sources have told 9 7 2 magazine,
they've in fact targeted civilians.
And here's another one that spoke with Israel, uh uh,
Brit UK Media, I said played before. Do
- You think that you witnessed war crimes taking place?
- Probably, probably the ground assumption is
that they are Hamas.
And then if you go this way, you're bound
to kill people that are not
- Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say?
- There are no uninvolved. Only unarmed. This is
- Exactly, there's just, there's so many examples
and he lists all of them right here.
Human rights watch al zero.
They've all proven this Harts kill zones.
I mean they're murdering people
just because they're present.
So let's talk about the moral equivalent, shall we?
Next one, indiscriminate attacks.
I mean you get the point here guys. I'm limited on time.
The idea is that we've already shown all these
bet sell 9 7 2.
I mean human rights watch
and Amnesty International, where they have been proven
to indiscriminately bomb civilians
with their own investigations separately, independently,
all, all of it shows you
that there's clearly not a moral
equivalence happen to agree.
Now here's the point I was making earlier.
Germany says it will arrest Netanyahu because of the ICC.
Here's what Richard Kemp says.
Germany has a lot of experience arresting Jews.
This is what happens even
to their chief allies when they barely step out of line.
Crazy. Also, here's the ICJP saying starvation war crimes
compliant against UK ministers complaints.
Excuse me, I thought that was wrong. Starvation war crimes
complaint against UK ministers submitted to Scotland Yard
expanding suspect's.
List of five senior British ministers.
Guys, this is terrifying them.
Even if they know somehow that it will never come
to pass the fact that this is being publicly done,
it must make them uncomfortable.
These are five British ministers who are being put forward
to their own Scotland yard about being
complicit to genocide.
Same thing's happening with Blinken and Biden, if not more.
It's all happening behind the scenes.
They, I guarantee that makes them uncomfortable.
'cause you know, it does just 'cause they
think they can control it.
There must be some part of them
that knows they could lose control
of this and end up in prison.
That is not normally what they deal with.
This is a win right here.
Even if it ends up going the direction you have done this,
guys, you watching this right now for sharing things,
talking about this protesting you have made this happen.
These are criminals who are finally seeing at least the
threat of accountability.
Now lastly, I'm gonna try to rush through this,
the compass protest.
Now this is Elman Ben Owen Jones highlighting
that Benjamin Netanyahu offers in a useful case study of
how false claims of antisemitism are used.
He simply says in regard to the ICJ,
you're all antisemites now because you said this.
And he says, this approach has run out of road
and will make people stop believing antisemitism exists,
which is irresponsible.
I agree. I said, it's all the Zionists have left.
They ran out of road a long time ago.
They drove over the cliff the day after October 7th.
Antisemitism is of course very real
and should be called out like any racism.
And the most obvious example of it today is Zionism itself.
That's the reality. But
that's what's happening on these campuses.
Here's a great clip that I'll let speak for itself.
- So I shouldn't have been surprised when
I heard what happened last month. A rapport
- Of the new and is speaking about the campus protest
- Times was told that something seemed
to be happening at Columbia University.
Students appeared to have claimed a lawn as theirs.
So like any breaking news story,
a slack channel had been created for the journalists
to discuss details and assign stories.
This is what they do at the New York Times
when this report had joined the Slack channel,
they were surprised to find
that it had been titled antisemitism on campus.
They had decided what the story was
before they even took a train uptown.
- Yeah. - Meanwhile,
journalists on campus have had a very different perspective.
You had begun reporting before a single tent was assembled.
You have not only witnessed the encampments, you listened
to the chance, you read the signs
and you spoke to the organizers, you did the work
and you did it so well
that journalists like me off campus turn to your words,
your Instagram accounts,
and we listen to your radio stations if we wanted the truth.
And you did that truth telling while cops harassed, assorted
and arrested you and your fellow students
and you did it all while trying to graduate and to grieve.
That is true for anti-Zionist Jewish students
who are having their faith questioned by those
who want them to fall silent.
It's true for students whose parents look like the mothers
and fathers being killed every day.
And it is especially true for the Palestinian students
who continue to frat the facts
while navigating unbearable grief.
I'm so proud to call you my colleagues
with the journalists in the room.
Please stand.
- I like that. I like the fact that these are people
that are, you know, the recognition,
whatever you think about their other politics, the reality
that these people like we did called
what we saw, which was the reality.
Just blindly follow the corporate media
who was shockingly proven to be wrong.
Now, here is another example of what we keep seeing.
Now, this, this is just a guy making fun of
what she's saying, but we keep seeing this false idea
that antisemitism is,
is a dark cloud overtaking this country
- Jew in the world.
How am I supposed to walk the street?
- Hey everybody, New York Jew here
and today I'm gonna teach you how
to walk the streets of New York, okay?
Because you know, some of you might not be feeling safe.
So what you gotta do in case you forgot,
you take your right leg and you walk forward like that
and you take your left leg like that.
And then we're walking here,
here, walk with me, walk with me.
Let's go try this out, right?
Today we are a little Palestine, as you can see,
I'm walking around just fine.
Alright? I'm around tons of Palestinian people
and as it clearly as the Jew.
So it's all love here. It's all peace.
up Baby's man doing a video right now. Yeah, yeah.
Doing a video. Just throwing, that's all. Love out.
Here's love for Jews.
And we, we don't a Zionists, it's wanna get some
hell let, let all day
- .
And obviously it's, you know, set up.
But I think it's just making it a point, right?
Here's another example. And these are crazy.
Now, here's the crazy thing about the
next couple we're gonna show you.
These are not fake guys,
and I find it almost impossible to believe.
I I just don't know how this, just so you know,
these are shown, verified, especially the next one,
that these are pe they're real stories of real people.
Now, I don't know whether they're doing, it meant to be sort
of a parody, like not a parody,
but like knowing they're not in danger,
but just trying to make a point.
But these are really happening.
These, to me, this feels like the onion or something
and it's really stupid.
But I've seen endless examples of this.
Here is, and this is even the worst one,
an Israeli naval officer
who participated in the atrocities in Gaza,
who went on Fox News and talked about what's going on.
He walked in the middle of this
campus and said he was afraid,
- Come and help me.
Please let I feel I'm safe. Can you come and help me?
Could you please come and help me?
, I feel unsafe and I'm afraid
- I don't even, I mean, this is not a joke.
This is, that's a real person who is an ac actual member.
I mean, I, I don't know how that's supposed
to be taken seriously.
Tiberius says, these videos encapsulate the dishonest
narrative of self victimization
and aggression that Zionism is built on.
An is rarely naval officer
who voluntarily entered the encampment, says he's afraid.
This is the craziest I've ever seen.
Now again, this one to me feels a lot more like you're
trying to make a point, but you tell me
and that mint press news put this out
and this is a re this is really
what happened. This is not a lie.
- Free Palestine, you're just a white man.
Free Palestine, high power
from the river to the sea.
Don't hurt me, don't hurt Palestine free.
Don't hurt me, river idiot.
Don't hurt me. This is so fucking hilarious, dude. Hurt me.
Don't hit me. Please don't hit me. Please don't walk away.
We have an get up.
Occupation is a crime.
Israel ought, right?
- So at the end there, he stands up
and does little, which makes me feel more
that he's trying to make a point.
Which obviously that seems ridiculous, but you know,
but realize that if somebody walked up
and filmed just the part where he was screaming, scared
that would go viral instantly.
Every person supporting Zionism would share that.
And that's already happened. That's a lot.
And this, these have been proven to be false.
This is the kind of thing that we're seeing
and that people like at Max Abram
points out as if it's real.
But my point is, even this, even the
Palestinian supporters come up and go, dude, get outta here.
What are you doing? He goes, in case you missed it,
the Zionist free encampment at University
of Toronto was chanting heel Hitler.
Is that what happened? Or is this one ridiculous person in a
mask screaming that they know they're being dishonest?
Oh, I thought I, uh, let's see.
Any case, it's right, you can see it right here.
See, these people are going, get outta here, man.
What are you doing? So I,
I don't wanna quickly download it, but he is saying, hi Hitler.
Yeah, get outta here. Do we, is anybody that stupid
to think that's what's really happening?
Now I'm gonna, I'll leave this for you to listen to.
The point is, I play this many times.
This is an ex massage agent who's admitting
that they use antisemitism to lie to you,
to scare you away from
acknowledging what's actually happening.
Here's Brian mast clumsily trying with the last ditch effort
to say, oh, by the way, it's actually
China who's funding all of this.
And that's why we can, why to try
to force the right wing party, right wing side of this
to blindly support this even more.
I think they're losing to support now.
It's all China or maybe Russia tomorrow.
Whatever stops you from recognizing what's really going on.
Now I'm gonna end, you end with just a clip
of this great song.
I don't have much time, but I'm gonna leave it there.
Guys, I have to rush off to an interview. I love you all.
Thank you for being here guys. I just can't express my
support or my what it means to me
that you guys are always supporting last American vagabond
and really the truth in general as best you can.
So I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
- Now it will go down in history.
It's a terrible day when those Oklahoma bombs
blew the building away.
169 people died while the media lashed down
and the government lied.
The press and the FBI dirt it all up when they blinked it on
Iraqis and the brown pickup truck.
But before they were through with their agenda on
that night, they were blaming anybody
who might lean to the right.
No, they played the spa, right?
Wild eye, anti-fat activists was being extreme right
wing domestic terrorists.
Those hate build ill will demon white supremacists,
that's the enemy.
But it sounds kind of strange to me.
- John Doe.