-
- Welcome to the daily wrap up, a
- Concise show - Dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours,
- Tuesday, May 21st, 2024.
Thank you for joining me yet again today.
Important stuff to talk about.
I think we're gonna cover, uh,
quite a few follow ups from yesterday's show
that I think are just important to continue on the kind
of outrageous response to the international court, uh, of,
uh, criminal court and,
and j just the way that, I mean,
the way I framed the title today, just to say
that right outta the gate is not necessarily
'cause there's some three hour focus, we're gonna ex,
you know, expose, I feel like it's quite frank,
quite evidently clear that this is what's going on.
And I, I, a lot
of the stuff we were gonna cover today on the show is like
follow ups to a lot of topics we've been,
we've been discussing, you know,
highlighting the ICC highlighting the food conversation,
highlighting, uh, you know, just the ongoing atrocities
that, that, that really do back up the allegations
in regard to Israel.
And, and as I'm going through it all I'm thinking, you know,
there's not really much I can use
to title this other than just, you know,
more on this topic, more on that topic.
And the thing that kinda hit me was just
as I was saying earlier to somebody that I kinda try
to tap into, like the, as you know, they say the zeitgeist
or the, you know, the kind of mo feeling of the moment,
the spirit of an age, whatever the term is translated to
that spirit of an age is usually what it's translated to.
But the idea that right now you can feel these things kind
of permeating
and one of them is the, in some cases uncomfortable,
un un you know, unacknowledged for some people.
But the unavoidable reality that the US government is not
what we pretend it is, that's not to say
that it is can't be.
I mean that's in fact the core point there.
We are not as a country what we,
and I don't mean the individually as people,
but I mean as a country because of what our government is,
are not what we pretend to be, but we can be.
And I believe that. And it's not even just about leaning
into the same tropes and, and claims
and the things that we're told by the government,
but simply just because most of what they throw at us as
that often credit Caitlyn Johnstone for this point is
because that's what they know.
We want. We want good people.
We want to fight for freedom
and then spread whatever ideology you think is appropriate
to democracy or whatever we wanna claim.
My point is that they pretend to fight for those things
because we want those things, not
because they want those things.
And what a shocking in, in, in real time reality is
that's being exposed is that they are showing
that face right now.
And one of the points I've been making throughout this
entire, you know, arm section
of the ongoing genocide occupation scenario in Gaza
or occupation of entire Palestine
just since October 7th, is my point.
What I've been really highlighting is just the fact that
it's, it's unusual, not that they would lie for Israel, not
that they would cover for their allies,
but that they're holding to this.
And I don't just mean the US government.
I mean I make this point constantly about the politicians,
about the media that they will hold to this lie
potentially at the expense of everything
that they've always fought for.
Now how do we really explain that?
And right now the most obvious example is the US government
not just standing by the government
that the entire world can see commit genocide while they're
pretending to fight for a rules-based order
or all the things they claim they're fighting
for being openly contradicted by everything Israel is doing,
but that they then attack the groups that
even halfheartedly make an attempt to highlight this.
And that's the biggest part here from the ICC
that people are highlighting today, is
that this was very much
as they've been calling it the both sides, them, you know,
as I pointed out in the show yesterday,
the interesting point of well there's three people from
Hamas and two people in Israel,
even though the entire government is equally complicit.
And I mean like literally with their statements,
with their orders, with their actions.
And then, and let's just even pretend
that everything you think about Hamas is true.
It doesn't make much sense in the context of
what the real situation is.
We're talking about one day,
and again, let's just say everything you think about
that day is true compared to seven months of ongoing attack
and murder and collective punishment
and starvation, all the
things that they're even highlighting.
How do you end up with three
and two, how do you end up with,
I think it was seven charges against Israel
and eight against Hamas.
It just doesn't really add up. It's very clearly a way
to soften the blow.
And I even pointed out the point
that hopefully it was about them actually seeing
that Hamas is at least the people they're pointing to
as I showed yesterday, comfortably living in Qatar
and showed you the statements of Israel saying
that they promised not to go after them in the beginning.
It's very clear what that shows you.
And the point is that hopefully they're highlighting that
that was our entities of the Israeli manipulation.
I don't think that's what's gonna
happen, but it's a hopeful point.
But I think what we're really becoming uncomfortably aware
of is that this is reverberating around the world and,
and even that illusion being shattered can in fact cause
destabilization, which is not to say
that we should maintain the illusion, it's
to show you the byproducts of what they've done
and even the removal
of their horrible situation is gonna reverberate.
But we should fight for the truth
and fight to allow that self-determination to really
per, I don't wanna use the same word again, say permeate,
but just, you know, find itself around the world.
Because the, the problem is that what we've been supporting
for those that have under the guise, that they're fighting
to spread the things that you want,
has in fact brought the opposite to country after country
after country around the world.
And many of us, us are very, very well aware of that.
And I frankly think that's the majority,
but I'm often hopeful when it comes to that.
I just want us to look at the stuff today for those
that may be new to it and just recognize
that it doesn't have to mean that you believe everything
we're talking about, that everything is the opposite
or whatever else you think that this all means.
Just acknowledge that what we're seeing is wrong.
And if you can acknowledge that, you have to recognize
that the way they're responding in sh a aggressive defense
of Israel, while we know they're committing crimes,
just doesn't really add up.
And then stand back and ask what that truly means.
If you're, if they're, if incapable unable, unwilling to
apply the law they claim is necessary equally,
then it doesn't mean anything.
And that's the real point.
And so let's get into all this today
and understand that we are watching change happen.
Doesn't mean it's gonna maintain,
doesn't mean it's even gonna actually materialize into
something that will be permanent
or even affect the real problem
unless we do something about it.
I argue it's possible. It doesn't have to end up that way.
Usually we see power structures struggling
to maintain their control over the next illusion,
but I truly believe we always have a moment
of opportunity if we can just see past all the partisan
screamers that are trying to keep us stuck in the paradigm.
That one last thing, we had a great,
I had a great interview today with Sal the agist,
which I was, I really enjoyed
and I really found it a fascinating conversation.
We, I had plans to get into all these different current
events and just to, you know, see him take his opinions on
stuff and we spent the entire time talking about,
as you might expect, a ariss anarchism, the idea
of different things like the Silk Road and cryptocurrency
and, you know, all these different dynamics and,
and why people misunderstand this.
The topic as I talk about often with anarchism,
I just found it to be very insightful.
I really, really appreciate the work he's doing and
and interestingly seeing, as I pointed out
before, how comedy and memes have a way
of finding their way past the walls
and disarming people when they don't even realize it.
Humor as well. And I think that's a big part of
what he does and I think it's important.
So that's probably coming out tomorrow.
It's not really time sensitive, so it may be, depending on
what happens over the next couple days,
a little bit longer than that, but look forward to it
because it's really, and I plan on having
another one with him for sure.
I found him to be very, we're very like in in mind
and I think it's important to find those kind of people and,
and, and, and bounce ideas off each other.
'cause we didn't agree on everything.
And I think that's also important.
So on that note, let's get into major
points we're gonna discuss today.
And I think that we're gonna start
with a point about antibody dependent enhancement.
Interestingly enough, my brother sent me
a, uh, what was this?
I think it was a zero hedge article about
a study which we'll go over talking about exactly.
Uh, even on Anne wake up today,
we were laughing about the fact that it just kind
of sad in Macab,
but we're laughing about how wild it is to watch.
I think it was, oh, I forget the guy's name.
Pretty famous actor speaking with Joe Rogan.
And he's like, let me explain to you why the spike protein
and all this stuff, you know, and how the masks don't work.
And I'm just going, gosh darn it, that's so frustrating.
Not that I'm glad to see it being discussed,
but when it's at a point when we were being suppressed
and censored even by these kind of people as well,
the stu you know, the people that might have been sitting
there talking about it today would've been looking at us
like, we're crazy four years ago.
And these things were being broken down in real time, not
because we thought so, but using peer reviewed science,
breaking down the expert's opinions, highlighting
what other doctors who were censored were saying about it.
And literally everything we've discussed has almost now
become common knowledge in a passive way.
Even though we, like many of them can't stand back
and go, oh, but that means we were all wrong this entire
time, or all the shots we took or the masks we were wearing.
But it's pretty much ended up exactly
what we were saying in 2020 and 2021.
That's not, I mean, in part it's to say
demonstrating our value, but to think of how wild it is
that that much can happen.
And most people have only ended up noticing it when Joe
Rogan or Tucker Carlson made a point about it without the
source material, half the picture
and it ends up staying there so they can do it again
and will fall for the trap again.
Unless we were able to educate ourselves to understand
how it all went, understand the source material.
And that's kind of the bigger point.
So antibody dependent enhancement was something
that I was really nailing down, really stressing
because it came from something from
before under SARS and Mers.
And that's not even to get into whether you think those are
real or viruses in general,
but the allegation, the claim that they were making,
the FCIs of the world that early on, talking about
how specifically coronaviruses were rife with the issue
of antibody dependent enhancement.
And I'm talking about the injections given to stop them,
that that's where that comes from.
The injection is given the antibodies create a problem
essentially making your body attack itself.
And I was waving my arms going, this is here.
The scientific, the science,
which I'll show you in a minute, very clearly says there's a
very specific and significant risk of the thing
that's happened to a lot
of people ever since they gave them that.
It's a barely acknowledged at this point.
And I just think that's wild.
We were trying to save lives
and part of me feels almost guilty
that we didn't make a bigger difference
because people are struggling the rest of their lives.
Many people will have these problems.
But we're gonna talk about one specifically now
that's being broken now about the HPV vaccine.
Well, what do you know? Here's another vaccine
that shockingly causes the thing that we've been,
I just think it's incredible that we can't,
as a society acknowledge how immediately dishonest this is.
That the, and I'm not saying we have
to blindly follow every study that comes out,
but that a study will come out from a high level entity
with high level doctors involved or scientists
and it says something that challenges the norm
and you don't get any conversation about it.
You don't get any coverage of it, even during the hype
of something like the COVID-19 illusion.
And I just think that shows you how truly dishonest,
not just that conversation is,
but the structure, the media
that's supposed to report on these things.
And that's why we'll show a point at the end today about the
campus protest and what an interesting point that was made
around the independent journalism of it all, showing you
yet again is such a stark example,
that they are no longer if they ever were journalists,
in fact, even remotely in the interest of the people.
They're pandering to power constantly.
And there's no way that you can pandre
to power while speaking truth to power.
But we're also gonna talk about the ICC,
we're gonna talk about a follow up on Iran.
Just one brief, uh,
actually I might have taken that out to be honest.
But a follow up on the ICC conversation
and I'll make a note about Iran since I'll
show the article we discussed.
We're gonna talk about a really important discussion around
American politicians, which obviously comes from the title
in general and how obviously these people are not just
fighting for the interest of Israel,
but actively fighting against the interest
of most Americans, if not the entire concept of America
to support a, the most obviously genocidal
entity on the planet right now.
The Zionist government that's controlling Israel
and most of the Jews with it that believe in some cases
that they're fighting for them, but they're not.
And a lot of Jews in the world right now are beginning
to see that fault, call it out and make that clear.
But how they're standing up in this one case, Stefan,
again in Israel stressing that this is important,
that this is what Americans should fight for.
And it just is ringing hollow for most people
because we're seeing that this is affecting everything,
including, well really the biggest point is
that politicians are showing themselves to be at first
and foremost fighting for a foreign entity
and in most cases at the expense of Americans.
We'll talk about the overlap of
one important part that goes over with the ICC
and that has to do with the idea of what they're stressing.
That there's no moral equivalency,
there's no equivalency in general between these two.
And there's a reason they're all stressing.
I mean, literally every politician the same
point, but the same way.
I wonder where they got their talking points
because that's the only way they can try
to whitewash the whole thing, not address the facts,
not say, well they did commit crimes
and here's what the I CCC said,
or you not get into the nuance of why Palestine is allowed
to have the right to do this with the,
because they are a state, because the ICC recognizes that.
But no, you don't wash it all away.
There's no equivalency
to just ignore all the facts you're hearing.
That's the best they can do.
But the bigger point about why the ICC is supposed
to supposedly not allowed to go after Palestine
or Israel in this sense because they have an
independent judiciary.
Judiciary. But is that true?
The word that I just couldn't grab yesterday
was judicial reforms.
And I don't know why I couldn't grab, I was trying
to discuss what Israel was going through
and we're gonna get to that later in the show today.
The idea of judicial reforms
and how they were, I mean, on the record, openly attacking
and undermining what we're pretending
as an independent judiciary to allow them
to circumvent the exact thing that they're all pointing to,
to justify why the ICC shouldn't be
out allowed to go after them.
The claim that, well, they're investigating themselves
and if they've got an independent
judiciary, then we don't need the ICC.
Well guess what? It's obvious that's not true.
And we'll go through that to get to the end.
And I think what's funny about it's people like Lindsey
Graham in other cases might have been highlighting this,
but right now we'll go get into the other, jump
to the other narrative because it suits the interest of,
you know, whoever, whatever, whatever APAC money is coming
its way or whatever interest he sees in the long term here.
But Americans do not agree.
And one of the most obvious examples that I can see.
But let's get into the opening point.
First of all, I think this is really interesting.
I wanted to make sure you guys saw this just
as a tangential point.
I don't know if you guys have seen this going around,
but Claud Schwab will be stepping down as executive chairman
of the World Economic Forum.
Now let's not start doing somersaults just yet,
but I think it's definitely a positive thing.
, I mean, if this was going the direction they
thought it would or what they wanted, I kind of high,
I highly doubt this would be the way it would be going.
It what it shows me is a successful
stand, you know, a successful effort
by the independent media, by just independent people
that don't want what they're offering as the only solution.
And it didn't really go their way.
But if you think for one second that means that's done
or stopping, then you are not paying
attention to what's been going on.
My point is that I think him stepping down is more
of an example that they're going to keep going.
They just wanna remove the guy that we've all focused on.
That's why you see Bill Gates as well, you know, in,
in many ways just kind of not making as many public, they,
they don't want you to connect these things with the people
that we highlighted as the central players.
So I think you're definitely
gonna find a new player in there.
What if Jacare comes back? Wouldn't that be interesting?
But I think that ultimately,
and I'm kind of joking, I think this is about trying
to give it a facelift because this is not going away.
So as always the whole yin
and yang of the world, it doesn't really ever end.
We're in an internal battle with good and evil
and that's just the way the world is.
But we need to make sure we don't relent in highlighting
and focusing on what they're trying to push under the guise
of what's in your best interest.
Whether or not Klaus Schwab is there.
But I nonetheless take this as a positive. I really do.
Now let's talk about this HPV vaccine, uh,
zero hedge, I think it was EPOCH times put out the HPV
vaccine may trigger rare
and often misdiagnosed autoimmune brain disease.
Now, first and foremost, why it might be misdiagnosed often
is because there's no research to, into how the, like the,
even the very concept of antibody dependent enhancement.
Imagine how crazy it is that you can have things like this.
We'll show you again in the end, which I was screening
about, it's actually from 2020 originally peer reviewed in
2021, highlighting that there was,
I've shown you many times a spec specific
and significant risk of antibody dependent enhancement.
Where was it? Right there?
The specific and significant risk
of antibody dependent enhancement should have been
and should be prominently and independently disclosed.
Now if you read the, what it's saying is the COVID-19 risk,
but after the injection, that's
what antibody dependent enhancement,
antibody dependent enhancement mean.
And it's very clearly discussed
right in here about the vaccines.
This is in 2020. So you can have this where they're,
and they're saying you need to tell people this
and if you don't, well you don't meet informed consent
in general and yet you still don't have any discussion.
You bring this up in front
of doctors and they're like, what?
Or other people, that's the point.
That's why you these things are often misdiagnosed
because the apparatus, the system does not want you to know
that this is a common byproduct
of the things they tell you are
gonna save you and keep you healthy.
It's just simply the reality. Now how is that possible?
Because it's dishonest.
So here's another example of one probably of many
that we don't recognize
that are causing these kind of things.
Now here is just the study itself. Ah, I knew it.
So it says the background, it's anti
ethyl d aspartate
or anti NMDA receptor encephalitis.
So like swelling of the brain is a rare autoimmune disease
which is caused
by antibodies attacking those receptors in your brain.
That's the general point. It basically creates this
situation where your body creates antibodies.
But well first and foremost that it creates a situation
where it recognizes part of your body
as the problem then creates antibodies to fight
that which is your body.
So my point from before, as many people have called out
and I'm leaning on far better experts in this field
to make these points like the doctors
who were highlighting this, some of the best in the field,
in the world that were still censored for it, they,
the spike protein buy the thing they're giving you,
whether we're talking about viruses
or bacteria proteins come from anything that was once alive.
Just to put that out there for the immediate dismissal
of the idea that there's a spike protein.
My point is that the spike protein,
the mRNA instructions delivering the mRNA,
delivering the instructions for the spike protein are
training your body to create that.
So now your body puts out a spike protein,
but wait a minute, your body is already been trained,
or rather the antibodies created due to that
to fight the spike protein.
So what happens when your body, as we now know,
continues to make spike protein?
The whole lie was that it stayed in your shoulder
and it made this one time and it was over.
Didn't happen in many cases.
We've shown you just yesterday with the Red Cross,
this is in the studies, the peer reviewed science shows
that at the least for 30 days, it's well past that
as studies have shown it in the bodies in
multiple autopsy bodies.
They have talked taken injections well
after they took the injections.
So it's obvious that that's the reality
that your body is attacking the things
that you've trained your body to attack E either you either
that's a weapon or they screwed up pretty big
and you guys can decide for yourselves.
So here's another example of the same thing.
An HPV has been around for a long time.
So maze your shocking news that we know, the thing
that we've always talked about is happening
and of course it says previous previous studies,
which is exactly my point,
have revealed the disorder might be induced by vaccination,
but they leave it in the air, they don't focus on it
because there's too much money being made.
Materials and methods, and I'll just jump cut
to the point all it's getting into in here is that saying,
although vaccines produce immunity against diseases,
they may trigger serious adverse events, which we all know,
but they love to ignore and pretend isn't the reality.
And of course when it becomes prevalent as again pointing
to the Joe Rogan conversation we were talking about earlier
where they're discussing, yeah, it's pretty common
knowledge, a 300% spike in this
500% spike in heart problems.
How, you know what he think? Is it 40%?
I don't even, I'm just deciding what they said.
And generally I think these are correct,
40% spike in some age groups of all cause mortality.
But we're baffled though and it's all
because they didn't take their medications
during the lockdown or whatever nonsense they're pushing.
It's obvious that this was a monumental mistake or attack
or you know, combination of the two.
Now the results, it says in the paper the association
between anti M-N-M-D-A receptor encephalitis
and HVP vaccination is discussed in terms
of their micro RNA biomarkers, which again, I,
that the only, the micro only comes to mind in regard
to this conversation.
Well actually make, I think the other one's better.
Where was that? Oh, I guess that's okay.
Here's the show we covered the Tesla vaccine. RNA micro fat.
Oh that wasn't the right one anyway, I,
I don't wanna try to search for it.
The point was these microRNAs
where we discussed this in the past,
but it says the biomarkers, the vaccination,
it's discussed in terms of their micro RNA biomarkers.
So very clearly we're talking about the idea
that the prevalence of these are indicative of the fact
that this is connected to that.
And it says, uh, uh, phylogenetic tree
and distance similarity analyses are used
to explore the relationship between their MI RNA biomarkers,
which is the short for micro,
which I don't think you need short for that.
The results show a higher degree of similarity
between the microRNA biomarkers associated with HPV
and the anti NMDA receptor encephalitis
or related vaccines when compared
to overall microRNAs conclusion.
This finding suggests that in cases
where individuals received the HPV vaccination experience,
uh, psychiatric
or neurological symptoms, which my god,
we've seen endless amounts of that, that
that's the hardest to connect.
We've shown you the idea right in the beginning about the,
uh, prions disease
and that was, that was a peer-reviewed study right in the
beginning, Alzheimer's A DL,
all this stuff connected directly to the mRNA vaccines
and that got immediately pulled back even though it was peer
reviewed, put up politics, pulled it down
and they act like that, prove something.
The point is, it passed the peer review process,
which is the whole point because the editor being pressured
by some other group decides
to yank it down under it might make vaccine hesitancy.
That doesn't create, that doesn't create any actual
doubt about the findings.
But in any case, the point is
the findings suggests these cases
where individuals are experiencing those things,
neurological symptoms, it should be considered
to diagnose anti NMDA receptor encephalitis given the
exclusion of other possible complications.
The point is this is clearly, clearly related
to the injection at least can be.
And so our point overall is that this is something
that is far more common than we're talking about with things
that have been given for a long time on top
of the new experimental gene G you know,
genetic modifications they've been giving people.
So it's just exacerbating the point.
Now also to go back
to the original point about the COVID-19 injections,
this is from 20 22, 1 of the ones we highlighted,
reevaluation of antibody dependent enhancement of infection
of anti SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies.
So they're talking about monoclonal antibodies as well,
but also mRNA vaccines.
And it simply says that many therapeutic antibodies
abbreviated as a BS
and mRNA vaccines both targeting the spike protein have
developed and approved in order
to combat the ongoing pandemic,
which really was not a pandemic based on all factors
and including the fact that this was less than the flu.
When we're talking about risk according to the Ionis group
and the peer-reviewed study that is still standing on that.
In consideration of these developments,
a common concern has been the potential
for antibody dependent enhancement of infection caused
by inoculated or induced antibodies.
Although the preventative and therapeutic effects
of these antibodies are obvious,
little attention has been paid to the influence
of the remaining
and dwindling antis spike protein antibodies.
How is it possible that these kind of findings can come out
because they're dishonest.
It's showing you the exact point that we're making
and I highlighted this in 2022,
that they're not just one out, they're continuing
and they still say dwindling,
but we know this goes on for a while
and those antis spike protein antibodies will end up
attacking your body that is making the same point here
as we demonstrate the certain monoclonal antibodies approved
as therapeutic neutralizing anti S protein antibodies
for human usage have the potential to cause
antibody dependent enhancement in a new narrow range
of antibody concentrations.
So not only the injections but the monoclonal antibodies.
They based on the same thing,
although the C collected from
mRNA vaccinated individuals exhibited neutralizing activity,
some gradually exhibited dominance
of antibody dependent enhancement activity
and a time dependent manner.
Point being, they also found this in 2022,
the results suggest possible emergence
of adverse effects caused by these antibodies in addition
to their positive effects they claim are there one on top
of another and they just keep hiding it.
Now this study we talked about,
actually I'll just show you this first and this
what we're talking about in this car.
Remember this guy, how's he working out?
How'd that, how'd the, how'd his belittling everybody
who called out the dangers of the injection, how'd
that work out for MZ dog or
whatever his name was, I forget now.
ZM MD Z dog or Zm dog or whatever his name was.
How'd that work out? Right? And this was a huge point we
made because remember how he fact checked this whole
discussion, that's the image he used right there.
This was him, his image.
And I just put this on top of
it, antibody dependent enhancement.
He's looking at it like it's stupid
and showing the doctors from what frontline, I think
or whatever, I forget what group they're from.
And on top I highlight the the 2020 order,
which he did this in 2021, which says, not
that it will be everywhere all the time,
but that it's a specific
and significant risk that should have been
prominently independently disclosed.
And his whole thing was it's fake
and these are crazy people, right?
I mean towards the end of all this,
I mean I don't know if he's still doing this,
but towards the end of his, you know,
feeling like he can still pretend that we're all being lied
to and it's all cons that we're all conspiracy theorists.
He was slowly starting to go, well yeah, that kind of,
the mass don't seem to work that just completely turning
around acting like, you know, Scott Adams in,
in halfway mark.
The point is a lot of these people were there making lots
of money, making lots of prominent choice, you know,
prominence from the mainstream
that we're gaslighting
everybody about things we could prove.
And here we are. Here's the study
that he pretend it wasn't there.
Main point, again, talking about the COVID-19 vaccines
designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize
vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were
not vaccinated, right?
So that's also the other point of it is, well there's kind
of an overlap too and I, I may have been conflating
pathogenic priming as well,
but the point being that in some cases we're also talking
about the idea of getting this shot
and then when you get confronted with the illness
that you're supposed to be protected
by it in fact makes it a lot worse, potentially deadly.
The thing they swore would never happen, right?
The point is the specific,
and I always make this point specific
and significant, it's actually quite rare to see
that language in a study like this.
It's usually more ambiguous
because they understand that science is fluid.
Not that we should blindly trust the science
or scientists settled.
All these dumb statements they made that are clearly shown
to be ridiculous today, the specific
and significant risk of the thing they just highlighted,
antibody dependent enhancement should have been
and should be prominently
and independently disclosed to research subjects.
'cause they were still going through the supposed research
currently in vaccine trials.
And they say as well as those being recruited
for those trials and future patients
after they give the injection approval.
So in general they're saying this is a big deal
and you need to tell people
or you are not meeting informed consent.
So this by the way, could be used in a court of law to argue
that here's a peer reviewed study
that says if they didn't tell me
and they didn't, that they
never actually met informed consent.
So I wanna sue them because they didn't tell me the risks.
Somebody should do that. A lot of people were hurt by this
and that was there from the very
beginning and they damn well knew it.
That important I think is important just
to make sure we don't miss these, you know, there's
so much going on in the world,
these things were clear in 2020 and 2021 and you remember.
Now let's talk about the, you know, for the rest
of the show in general, we're talking about the
stories that I referenced.
The idea of the dwindling illusion
that the United States is an altruistic entity,
rather the government, the idea of the ICC,
the crimes being committed.
Now, I thought it was important
to start with something in general.
We're gonna start with what I kind of tend to do at the end,
which is a lot of the atrocities,
but I wanted to highlight this around this point.
Now, code pink, a group that does a lot of this kind
of like in, you know, they, they will be
behind them in their hearings and,
and which I don't know exactly
how they always get the access to that,
but either way, I love that they do it.
And now obviously,
I dunno why we have to even make this point.
This is a two party illusion thing, but that just
because we have what they're doing does not mean we believe
everything they say and support everything they do.
It's simply not the case. There's plenty
they've done in the past, which I disagree with.
The point is that what they're
doing here, I think is important.
And you'll see this is, this is blinking
sitting down and I'll play it for you.
And they, they stand up
and they just start calling him what he is.
War, criminal. Their hands are all painted with blood.
And I love this because it guarantee,
it makes him uncomfortable unless he's a complete
sociopath, which is certainly possible.
But the point is that I do not believe in
or agree with the idea of canceled culture,
of shutting people down
from speaking that you disagree with.
To be clear, this is very different.
We're talking about a a an elected politician
and you know, we want to pretend that's how that works
at the illusion they're in.
And the point being that we're, they're supposed
to be accountable to us again with the illusion.
So the point being is that they're not there
to speak and you're letting them speak.
It's not about free speech, it's about the fact
that they are ignoring the right your rights.
They're ignoring what they're, they're
maintaining a genocide.
They are allowing the crimes,
they pretend they're trying to stop.
So they're there to highlight that.
And I think that's important.
Now, I I, whether or not they were gonna do
that the entire time if allowed
and stop him from speaking, it's not the same
as like if Lincoln was out giving a speech somewhere, I,
it would be a finer line for me where I'd be like,
well it's again, that is a
personal capacity, blah, blah, blah.
I just, I think it's important that while he's there
to set the narrative, which he does,
there's the next clip is even more funny the way he ends it.
He's simply, simply there to lay down the lies
that we're supposed to be drinking.
And here's what they did, and I think it's important,
and I guarantee you this, if he has any feelings at all, is,
you know, an oral person doesn't like to sit there
and be called a war criminal
and a, you know, secretary of Genocide,
while people are sitting around them giving him sideways
glances, I guarantee that doesn't make him happy.
- Genocide, gen,
criminal war criminal, an embarrassment
to international law, genocide, enablers, how
complicit genocide, war criminals.
The blood of 40,000 Palestinians is on your hand.
Criminal genocide in Gaza Gen,
the blood of 40,000 murderers on your hands.
War, criminal war, criminal, criminal, the
of over 40,000 Palestinians on your hands.
Butcher shame on you
- Sitting there like nothing's going on
- The Senate Farm Relations Committee come to order.
- Okay? So that's actually, that actually makes my point.
I I, I missed that at the end. So when he, when he says come
to order, they sit down, right?
So I actually appreciate that.
So it's not like the idea of the cancel culture mindset,
it's really just you're trying to make a statement which
they have a right to do and, you know, and,
but that you could disagree with, right?
This is the idea of whether they're the decorum
and, you know, the whole conversation.
But this is what I was saying
before about the people in those positions
with themselves is very different
than the individual as well.
But it whole, all these things are important to flesh out.
Now here's the other one, this is the next one
also from them where they continue
to disrupt him later in the conversation.
What I think is hilarious about this,
now they're standing up and calling him a war criminal.
Why? Because he's lying about what they're doing.
He's gaslighting the world about
how there's not a genocide happening.
How they're not committing crimes,
how they support their right to self-defense.
It's, it's disgusting. And I think most people in the world
are absolutely aware of this.
And I think what they're doing here is important.
Listen to what he says after they stand up and,
and say that you're violating international law
- Public of China. He's a
- Criminal, he's a criminal.
- Look at his face. You know,
I don't care whether you're a sociopath or not.
Like that's gotta be irritating at the very least,
which I love, you know, put it in their face.
You're disgusting. You're a war criminal,
you're murdering children
and we're not gonna let that slide.
And here's what he says,
- Secretary, you may continue - People's republic of
pursuing military economic
and geopolitical preeminence challenging our vision
for a free, open, secure,
and prosperous international order. ,
- It's just free and open.
International rules-based international order, right guys?
, I mean, how pathetic, how can anybody take
that person seriously?
It doesn't matter whether you agree with everything
that they think is happening, it's undeniable
that you do not have a balanced world
based international order.
You're actively applying the rules
selectively to who you want.
Nobody is unca unable to see that.
I just think it's hilarious that that's
what they ha he, oh, let's get back to it now.
E now how about, let's talk about
equal law for everybody, right?
, it's like empathetic as that.
I think it's perfectly time for that clip.
Now, really quickly, I wanted to, I I, I forgot to add this
and I was gonna do this first, but just to quickly show you,
this is why these were dropped off
because when this thing refreshes, I lose
these, I'd add these back.
This is what happened again today.
I don't know if this is just me, but every now
and the Twitter just acts crazy
and I just, the whole thing crashes.
Not every post, not even the browser, just Twitter.
Isn't that interesting? And if you tell me if it's happened
to you, 'cause if it's not, then it seems
to be a selected throttling for me.
And I think that's starting to happen a lot on Twitter.
Anyway, my point was, I wanted to start
with this quote that somebody sent me.
And I I wanted to kind of block it out
because I don't want people to know, you know, most people
that do that don't want their name to be shown and so on.
But I really appreciated the letter he sent
and it point above is he's really highlighting the fact
that it's not about the, the narratives they're spinning,
he says, or you could see above,
it's about rich Jews killing poor dudes.
It's really a war on the poor,
which shows you it's not about antisemitism, right?
But the point is, he does this,
ends with this quote I think is important.
I'm not familiar with Victor Surge, remember who, that's
who cites this as being the quote.
You guys can tell me if that's the accurate point.
I like the quote itself. He who does not cry out when truth,
he who does not cry out the truth
when he knows the truth becomes the accomplice
of liars and falsifies.
I love that. It's also kind of a way
of saying the classic statement of, you know, comp uh,
you know, silence is complicity, right?
If you're just doing nothing,
you're allowing it to continue.
So he who does not cry out the truth when it's important
right now, when he knows the truth, becomes an accomplice
of liars and FALs fires.
Love that. Now, on that note, in general, I also wanted
to start with highlighting a couple things before,
and it's a good time before we get into some
of the atrocities we're gonna discuss.
And that is the idea that
actually, oh, hold on, let me, let me do this.
I forgot. We do have a couple more.
Marshall had some engagement on Twitter
that I wanted to highlight that I think is important.
He was one of our mods. We'll come back
to that after I play these clips.
'cause what we're gonna get into in the next opening segment
is kind of the, you know, just the,
just in the last 24 hours, just ongoing deliberate
war crimes, publishing them on TikTok
and Instagram, laughing about doing things that in no matter
what you say is the context are a crime no matter
what showing them, burning people's homes down,
laughing about it in Cal, in Gaza.
I mean it's all right there on the record.
Before we get to that, this is how incredible this is,
how brazen this is, and this is going on
to show you whether this is supposed to be off the record
or not, that the US government is
not what it pretends to be.
This was Ryan Grim PO posting this Bilal Hyman who had,
he just had an interview with him and a handful
of Arab American leaders met with Anthony Blinken.
Blinken told them that if Palestine became a state,
federal law would mandate the defunding
of the United Nations,
which in other cases may be something you support,
but think about the balancing of that.
So you are the one claiming you want a state for Palestine,
but then when they put it, when you discuss that, they say,
well, if we did the thing that we're outwardly saying we
want to do, then, then we have to just defund the un.
Then, which would then he goes on to say,
defund the World food program,
which would probably cause global starvation.
Oh, okay. So it's a balanced situation then, right?
So the thing that you're pretending that you want,
we just can't do, we're bound because
otherwise it would starve the world
because we would just have to pull
the money from the thing we don't want.
So it's not our fault.
Like how do you even logically make sense of that?
What that is is coercion, that's threats.
You're saying that we would have to do.
The US law does not demand that you have
to defund the United Nations.
If you allowed what should be this is
because they've created that,
that's an Israeli influence over the outcome of policy.
This is not what's just, it's not what's constitutional,
which is what really ultimately matters is we're
told to the law.
But here we are, and I'll play it for you
where he's openly making this point.
And also don't miss the similarities to
what Netanyahu was quoted
as saying in the LACO meeting in 2019, that if we want
to stop essentially a two state solution, then we have
to fund Hamas
paraphrasing, and I'll play it for you in a second.
So it seems like they are on the same path. And
- So in the topic of statehood got brought up, we had asked
for both a free and independent Palestine, a statehood
and a seat at the UN Security Council table.
And the response was disappointing
because it made the, uh, comparison to, um,
well first and foremost that a vote
for a Palestinian statehood from the US would lead
to the defunding
of the UN from the US being its primary, um, funder.
But then the example brought up was that it would be,
uh, within the right of the UN to then
cut programs like the World Food Program.
And so the fact that, uh, the comparison was made that
the world would have to go hungry just like the GAAN are,
um, and the fact that it's US policy
to starve the world if Palestinians have a free state,
regardless of if that's the law
or not, is indicative of something severely wrong. Right?
- And on top of that, before the other guys chime in,
you realize that that's not the idea
that the World Food Program, without
that all these people would starve.
That's not even the reality.
Now, yes, there are people that are
unfortunately dependent on that today.
That's not because they just don't know how to farm
or make food or do anything to produce food.
It's because they have been put in that position
by belligerent foreign policy.
And it's like the Palestinians in the same point.
So that one, they're dependent on aid and refugee platforms
because they're being denied their own self-determination
or in other places like Africa, they've been occupied
and destabilized and reaping people have outsourced
everything at the, their expense
for the other country's benefit for centuries,
well before the United States.
And now we go, Hey, we need to keep doing it,
otherwise they're all gonna starve
because we maintain that insecurity just actually we,
the the belligerent governments of the world.
- Yeah. So, oh, go ahead. Go ahead.
Yeah, so just so Anthony Blinken said, we have to oppose
Palestinian statehood or else the World Food Program budget
will be cut and people will starve around the world.
Like that's the Secretary of State's assessment
that he's making to you guys in this meeting.
- The example was given that if the UN had
to cut its funding, it would have
to cut programs like the World Food Program.
And that was the example, uh, shared, followed
by the explanation that then the world would have
to starve as the Gaza are.
And so that is not the comparison you make to,
to make an argument for why
Palestinians should not have a free state.
- Hmm. That's pretty wild.
Now, obviously, Ty Tiberius said what I was saying earlier,
the US lying blatantly,
we support a Palestinian state the very next day,
if Palestine becomes a state, we'll starve the world.
There you go. Quick summation of the whole thing.
Now, Alii points this out.
A bombshell leaped recording of Minister Gland.
He uses the US
or excuse me, he says, excuse me,
the US doesn't really mean it
when it speaks about a Palestinian state.
It says, the Americans are not one immovable block.
Sounds like what Dya said.
We just played the clip for you yesterday.
They know there will be no Palestinian state.
Believe me, ignore the public statements.
That's what, and I'll play the clip for, well,
technically it's, he's speaking, I will play it.
I think I've got it lined up, but
it's in, um, it's in Hebrew.
But the point is either even, well, so in one case,
he's telling you the truth, which I think is easy
to understand that the US government doesn't believe any
of this, that which we just demonstrated.
They're completely lying about it.
And behind the scenes, they're going, don't worry,
we're just doing that to pacify or he's lying about it.
And all that demonstrates is
that they don't care what anybody think.
All of this is important. And here is,
oops, forward, here we go.
This evening we publish interesting statements
by the Minister of Defense and we just showed you that
says, says, ignore the American statements.
They realize the Palestinian authority will never
step into Gaza.
And that they're, then that's
because like we told you, I'll play that clip next.
They wouldn't allow its divide and conquer.
And that will be no Palestinian state
with any Israeli government.
- Let's - Listen to what he said. And the pilots, it,
the Americans are not the one who will block.
If they want something, they tend to do it now.
They speak differently. They know our policy and they know,
and they know that the PA will never step into Gaza
and that they will be no Palestinian state.
Believe me, ignore the public statements.
They know that there will be no state.
And this is, I mean, think about how long I've been trying
to convince people who may have on the fence
that they never really wanted that, oh, you're so racist,
Ryan, and oh, you're such a liar.
All these, you know, and usually people
that probably never would've believed don't even
now would lie about it.
The point is that this has always been the reality.
It has always been a deceptive manipulation to blame them
for the thing that they created
to keep them under their boot.
There's just no way around it.
No Palestinian state will be established.
And that's because Israel cannot control that.
That will never happen. Well, look at that.
What a candid moment that was.
That was on corporate media in Israel.
Now, Bruno, so over here we have the first point
that they will, you know,
should we allow the Palestinian state,
well, we'll have to starve everybody.
Sorry, here's Bruno pointing out the us which has resisted a
ceasefire agreement, tooth and nail.
In fact, vetoed it, I think at least three times now,
complains that the ICC decision, you know, based on the law,
could hinder a ceasefire agreement.
You can't make this up, right?
So they're using the thing that they've stopped
as many times to say, well, they're gonna hinder.
That's, it's the, it's a game.
They're using the lives of these people to play a game.
And the bottom line is, that's exactly, exactly
what Netanyahu just said.
Well, this is like basically as a coercion point to say,
well, if you come after me, we're gonna, we will have
to ignore the ceasefire agreement, which
by the way, you were never gonna do anyway.
It's really upsetting. And just
because in case you don't forget,
since we're not gonna focus on the protests
and the hostages today, thousands of Israelis take
to the streets demanding the overthrow of Netanyahu
and his government, which would mean the c the,
the current coalition to facilitate a ceasefire
and exchange deal with the resistance in Gaza.
So you understand that we've already made this clear and pe
and not groups like 9 7 2 magazine have made this clear
speaking to people on the ground, in fact,
that they do not care what Netanya was saying anymore.
They tell, they said, make the deal, take
what Gaza is offering, not
because they wanna save the Gaza people in most cases, but
because they want their families back
and they recognize with every moment they're continuing
their belligerent campaign, they're killing them, everybody,
including the hostages for time and time again.
So their people are now marching through the streets
and saying, take the effing deal.
And they're over here going, we'll
never do it for the people.
. It's just like, it's so disgusting
and your government comes and tells you that you're racist
for saying they're doing the wrong thing.
Well, their people agree with you somehow
how we can't connect those dots, right?
It's crazy. Now,
before we get into the provable examples
of the genocide they're committing, I wanted
to highlight this just, and this
is kind of the same segment here.
This is what Marshall was just dealing with.
Now, Marshall, if you don't remember in the chat, an OG
of our been around since the beginning of he left.
He's, he's one of the, he's one of the longest supporters,
and he's somebody I care about deeply.
And he hasti, he's been going through a, a bout with cancer.
And he says, well,
we posted it basically saying, this is what I've been dealing with.
And, and the positive note is
that it looks like the cancer is at least
for the most part gone, or at least in the, the scan
that they took, that's not being seen
and so on positive news, right?
And this person who is, you know, kind of a Zionist troll,
well, he says, happy to hear your MRA and PET scan.
All cancers are gone
basically saying, you know, praise to God.
However, I'm, I'm afraid that missed,
they missed your brain tumor.
My suggestion. Two more chapters of Theran Day in an apple.
Now obviously there's free
speech, you can say whatever you want.
No, never would argue somebody like this should be censored.
My point is, if you were to flip this around
and there was a, a prominent Jewish person out there,
just a Jew saying, I got my cancer gone.
And you came in and made it about maybe you gotta, you know,
you missed it with your PET scan, make sure you read,
read your Torah again.
You, you all know what would happen right now on Twitter.
I just wanna make a point, first of all,
that this is just the unbalanced example on Twitter,
but also the idea that, you know, what's the point of being
that nasty to somebody just
because you don't like their political views?
That's important. Now, he, uh,
reported for hateful conduct, oh no scar.
I add this backwards, hold on this.
He reported for conduct
and they responded saying,
doesn't violate any rules just in case you, you know,
guarantee would the other way around.
Now this one's also important.
Now Marshall himself posted something on his own time
saying, tagging this person
and saying, my father's beautiful house in Ramallah.
He lost it to Zion Gangs, furniture
and all, which means Zionist gangs,
which is anybody confused about the fact
that these illegal settlers that are even being pos
pretended they pretended to sanction because they're raping
and pillaging that the whole world is covered.
Now even corporate media are Zionists, is
that somehow a, in incent?
Is that somehow a racist thing?
They're Zionists, they proudly tell you that.
And they're roving gangs
that have now began official capacity
and they stole this house.
It's factual. It's exactly what's going on.
But because you said Zio, oh, it's racist, anti-Semite.
And they censored this, they literally censored this on
Twitter under hateful conduct where he's talking about
how these settlers stole the person's home.
Let's pretend like this is still balanced. Okay, crazy.
Now talking about the balance of all this Giannis Tara,
who is a journalist on the ground,
who's been top covering this Palestinian reporter,
is highlighting this repeatedly.
Now, just before the people who wanna assume
anything Palestinian somehow means liar
or whatever the racist thing spinning through your mind is.
You don't need him to point this out.
They're pointing it out.
What he continues to highlight is all of them, day
after day, the IDF, the people on the ground,
even the Israeli officials themselves
proudly pointing their crimes out,
proudly posting these pictures
and these statements online, on Twitter, on Instagram,
on TikTok, all of it include in tagging the ICJ and the I
and, and saying they're committing crimes.
Israeli major Amit Dairy, a deputy commander
with the 35th Paratrooper brigade in a Facebook post from
October 10th, here's what he said, Gaza must be destroyed.
All of it, every building,
every home every school also while Shefa Hospital, not
because there's Hamas present, but
because they're trying to destroy everything,
because that's been made clear.
That's my point, by the way.
And then he continues to self quote this saying,
this isn't said by Ben Gere.
This was said clearly by Gira Eland a moment ago, one
of these other belligerent Zionists on in,
in their government giving Gaza residents a few hours
to leave to Egypt, which is
that there's no reason they should have
to flee another country from their own home
and immediately start work.
He says, it doesn't take much time, right?
Just leave your homes and go where we tell you to.
Why is this so difficult?
He finishes by saying, with intensive air force activity,
it's a matter of few days.
There's no other way, but just destroy everything.
Let's pretend like that's not obvious collective punishment.
That's not even mentioning the point of Hamas.
Of course, that's what they'll try to conflate it with.
Well, 11th of October responding
to Israeli channel 13 correspondent Alma Boker reports about
Palestinians injured receiving medical treatment in
Israel, says, brothers, in arms.
It is important to publicize and resonate within our ranks.
Terrorists are not left alive. It is fundamentally immoral.
We all need to commit the act this way.
We're talking about Palestinians,
not Hamas, but that's the point.
They call them all terrorists.
All this is very easy to prove.
We will further erase the memory of Alek, which
by the way is one of the central points of the ICC
that is a reference
to just killing every man, woman, and child.
And al, I mean, almost all
of the politicians made this point.
Now they're hap I mean, there's
no way to miss what this shows you.
The deliberate plan is the execution
and annihilation of Palestine and Palestinians.
If you've ever seen anything more clear, you tell me.
Here's just some of the other examples.
Now, some of these are minor in pe in in some cases,
like in the sense of comparing them to genocide
and open execution, right?
But pretty a, a big deal when you take it into context.
Here they are. And by the way, if you notice in all
of these homes, they're all spray painted
and tagged up with whatever they're putting there in Hebrew.
Why does that make sense? It should be there
because they've already talked about this.
They're letting them do this because it's like they're
getting their revenge, most moral army in the world
right here.
They are setting a couch on fire inside
of a home and laughing about it.
I guess there's a Hamas tunnel right there, apparently,
because that's the only way that would be legal.
And even then, it still wouldn't be legal here.
They're laughing and burning down what appears
to be a bigger building, probably something
official doesn't matter.
And they posted this on public channels.
Here's K News Network highlighting an important point
that goes back to the hospitals number.
The lies about sif of hospital exclusive footage obtained
by Al Jazeera shows Israeli occupation.
Soldiers excavating
and stealing hundreds of Palestinian corpses
from Alfa Hospital.
Many of those bodies were returned weeks later
with missing organs and some of their bodies skinned.
And if that sounds crazy to you, do the research.
In fact, watch this episode
because one of the things they seem to focus on is the skin
and the the transplant concept.
This is, I mean this is sounds crazy, but it's very real.
And the reality of this is
that there is countless human rights groups,
even from the United Nations in some cases,
highlighting this concept
and around the world being caught for trafficking.
This stuff, Israel's open secret of Palestinian organ theft.
It's really not hard to see.
Like a lot of the others point is here's the video showing,
you know, it, it might better to do it this way actually,
so you can get a cl a closer shot,
what you're seeing in the background,
taking the dead bodies and carting them away.
This what we're talking about,
soldiers can be seen transporting bodies on stretchers
and seen piled up in the back
of this Israeli truck right there.
Look at that. So we're supposed to pretend
that those are all potential hostages
that they're just checking to be sure hardly.
These are dead Palestinian bodies.
It says the footage dates to the time
of Israel's initial raid all the way back on November 23rd,
which destroys their narrative.
God's official said he had loaded more than a hundred bodies
into the Army truck, which you just saw.
It's the kind of, it's this kind of evidence by the way,
that it's just incredible.
I had to cough. What I was gonna say is incredible
that this kind of evidence can be there
and we're still debating.
So watch this. If you'd like to understand how clearly
undeniable this is here at other hospitals, which is,
this is one that's currently ongoing the situation at the
Kamal Mond Hospital, but apparently,
which apparently is the last barely
functioning hospital in northern Gaza.
It was operating with great difficulty,
but Palestinian medical staff had been assisting patients
there for the last 228 days.
Israeli occupation forces have besieged the hospital
for the last three days and surrounded it with snipers.
We briefly covered this the other day.
Doctors were forced to move all patients
to one floor away from windows.
They were crawling between patients in fear
of being shot by a sniper.
These have been reported by the doctors who were there.
We've seen even people like from
before, from Dr. Maynard, who's told you what he saw at Alfa
before this, not in the same place, but in other hospitals.
And it says they were crawling
between patients in fear being shot
by the sniper, by a sniper.
Today we have evacuated patients,
including premature babies.
Many bedridden patients with severe injuries are unable
to leave, leading them to die in the hospital.
Now, unfortunately, there's been reports,
and Al Jazeera did an in-person report holding one
of the dead babies showing you that they were two babies
and incubators that they were stressing
were needed to be taken care of.
They forced them outta the hospital and deemed them dead
because they were there, they died.
And if you think that's hard to wrap your mind around.
Let's not forget about the six babies in incubators were
left in the other hospital, and this was verified
by corporate media as if that means anything more than us.
The point is that they said, we followed up with this.
They talked to 'em about it. The point is, the doctors
who left stressed, we told them they were there,
and that's pre verified.
They told the IDF, there was an IDF statement about this.
They, they saw very clearly that they were babies
that were left, forced them out.
And then coming back months later,
they were all still dead on those beds,
which means the IDF was told they were there
and disregarded that left them to starve to death.
Not hard to see. Here's a video of one of them,
or rather, these people he just referenced, right?
Evacuation of the wounded from Komal Alban Hospital.
Now, recognize how crazy this is, guys.
The narrative is supposed to be,
oh, we're going after Kamas.
And even if that's the case, you realize
that they have no right to just re just, I mean,
these are people in hospital beds rolling down streets room
with rubble, people that are injured, older people, people
that have limbs blown off, people that are frail
and starving, and they're just going run down
to the next place where there's no food, no water.
This person's in a, in a hospital bed.
How is this supposed to be legal?
How does that make sense to anybody honest?
And then of course, on the way they run the risk
of getting shot anyway, because they're doing that too.
That's just crazy, guys.
There's no way you can make sense of that.
A Palestinian boy on his bike documented,
lying dead in the ground the morning
after being shot in cold blood by an Israeli army sniper.
And Janine, the child was riding his motorbike on his way
to school when a bullet was directly fired,
his head killed him right away.
We've seen videos of this continue to happen.
Janine, also,
E Sarai points out Israeli forces get killed seven
Palestinians in the ongoing invasion of the city.
So that was just one, one example.
Death tolls will increase among the murdered,
a renowned medical doctor, a teacher
and three school children on their way to their work
and school, which I've heard that
number actually higher from some reports.
All of them were civilians and totally unarmed.
And the images he shows
you is what they're doing to the area.
So are we to believe that this was Hamas on the ground?
Are they digging up Hamas graves?
Are they looking for Hamas tunnels? No, no.
They're just flattening the area for future settlements.
'cause that's absolutely happening.
And Vere is just unabashedly pointing that out.
But if you say it in this country, oh,
you're a racist because that's, that's Vegas.
That's blood libel. It's crazy, man.
Here's Benga Vere demands an all out assault on Rafa,
followed by full Israeli occupation of the strip.
You know the thing that's fake news
because it's, it's racist to point out
that also a shocking violation of international law
that even the United States acknowledges.
They just lie and say it's not gonna happen.
They lie and say it's not currently occupied.
And here he is going, well, we're gonna do an all out
assault and the only area they have left,
and we're gonna occupy the whole thing.
This guy's a maniac, especially knowing
that they're calling this out or that they're,
and this is why Glant will say, don't worry about the us.
We don't care what they think we don't like.
This is the point. They don't care.
So how do you not see that power dynamic
and recognize that when it comes to funding and,
and munitions, that the US clearly can pull the plug,
but something else is guiding this.
When they can stand there
and say exactly what the US claims they're not doing.
Nobody seems to care something has something over somebody.
He envisions forcing Palestinians out, followed
by massive Israeli settlements,
including his own relocation.
Here's what he said in a public statement from Harts.
I would very much like to live in ga,
voluntary immigration live in Gaza.
Voluntary immigration should be encouraged.
This is the way they're pretending their whole, as time goes
by, if this goes the way that it has in the past,
this will be the narrative spun over the next 10 years.
Oh, we voluntary immigration, we just,
we let them go somewhere else.
You mean as you bombed
and killed them into the location you drove them to.
That's not voluntary immigration,
but they want to set that narrative, right?
Just like they pretend the original nakba was about them
being attacked and then helping them gently go
to the other location that they wanted to go to.
It's just disgusting and it's insulting.
He says, national Security of the Rights,
national Security minister at Mar Ben Gere said
that Israel should control the Gaza strip after the war.
It controls it. Now, this not being ridiculous
and that voluntary immigration
of its residents should be encouraged
and Jewish settlements should be established in his
territory, Jewish settlements.
Why is that not insulting? Why is that?
Why is that a racist? Why is that not exactly
what everybody calls out in any other context?
Oh, because we're talking about the Jewish state, really,
we're talking about Zionist using that concept
and Biden himself playing this rule as a Christian Zionist,
let's realize they are clearly in control
of the entire area based on everybody
with any standing in regard to the United Nations in regard
to international bodies, human rights groups
as Francesca Albany lockstep.
It's the reality. This is an occupied territory.
What they're talking about is putting boots on the ground
and building settlements on top
of the ashes of what they lived in.
And they're pretending like a few of them can stay.
Probably another encampment like a, like another, like Gaza
or another West Bank scenario.
Within that, he says complete occupation of Gaza
with full Israeli control.
I mean, that's, that's nowhere, nobody outside
of them are saying that
because that is supposed to be illegal,
and that is supposed to be the opposite of what they pretend
that they're actually striving for, which is, you know,
a place for the good Palestinians.
Nope, not even remotely Jewish settlement, he says.
But the most important step encouraging voluntary
immigration, by the way, I'm not saying everyone,
he said this with an interview and an interview.
Vir also said that he'd be happy
to live in the Gaza Strip if that were possible, .
It's just, they're just really trying
to set a tone and it's not gonna work.
They've lost this already.
When asked if he intends to return to the settlements
that were evacuated in 2005, he said, not only that,
you have much more to bring in.
If there is an immigration of hundreds of thousands
who leave, you can bring in more and more people.
You know, Jews, of course, only Jews, Jewish settlements.
That's the reality. This should insult everybody.
If we were talking about only Christian settlements in,
in parts of Africa, or,
or rather wherever, like let's just say in the Middle East,
mean, you understand there are Christian populations in all
of these areas, but wouldn't that be seen as bigotry?
What if it was only, you know, a, a
settlement for white people?
Different, different topic,
but aren't they the ones conflating Jewish
with a, with ethnicity?
The point is that you can obviously see
that this is a problem
and people are terrified to point it out,
but they're losing that power Zionists.
And here is another example.
This one's even crazier
and this one was already deleted, showing you
that the very least, they don't want you to see,
they know what they believe.
They don't want you to see that they believe that,
which means they somewhere in them know
that at the very least you think it's wrong.
Abir points this out. This is the deputy mayor of Jerusalem,
Araya King, in his own words,
she writes this monster rules over the lives
of more than 400,000 Palestinians in Jerusalem.
Here's what he wrote. This person IDF
or at this account, IDF online, IDF,
eliminates the Muslim Nazis in Gaza.
That's how he starts. First of all, again, the idea
that Muslim Nazis,
these people are ridiculous with a capital N.
So we're talking about the Nazi party, right?
The idea of white supremacy
and the ways we connect those things today, even though the,
the reality history is all muddled today, the point is
that the ideology, it does not even remotely make sense
with what they're using it for.
They're just desperately trying to lobb you.
What we actually know is the background of Zionism.
But here's the point. Remember this picture.
Do you remember what this was in this?
This was one of the earliest ones they did.
This was later broken down unequivocally
as a complete war crime that most of, I mean,
pretty much every one of those people
that didn't go missing, which is part
of this discussion, were let go.
So even if their own admission were not Hamas, and
nonetheless, you had the Mosad account, plenty
of other Israeli accounts,
go look at all the terrorists
they caught coming outta their holes.
That was Eli David that said that they lied.
They then they lie about everything,
but he says they eliminated the, some
of them they did shoot, they killed them
right in front of a big hole.
What do you think that means? He says,
we have to pick up the pace.
If I had made the decision, I would've jumped four DNS
and put them behind the mounds of dirt
and given the order to cover all these hundreds
of ants while they were still alive.
Now realize, even if you think they're Hamas,
that's also a war crime, even for your enemies.
They are not human beings, he says, and not human animals.
They are subhuman and that is how they should be treated.
Gee, that sure sounds like Nazi concept to me,
to protest the memory of Alek, of course,
'cause kill all men, women and children is
totally not extreme.
This person says, I've never read anything more Nazi than
what this maniac writes here.
The actual Nazis will be proud.
Then of course, he deletes this.
Well, here's the Hebrew image of it, but he deleted it.
Now, in fact, I'm actually, as I'm reading this,
I'm pretty sure we've read this before.
Remind normally don't the chat if we read this,
because this is not new, it's hard to wrap to, you know,
remember all of the, I mean, think about
how crazy that statement is in general.
It's hard to remember all of the examples
of their genocidal intent.
It's pretty, actually, it's pretty hard,
but I, I believe we actually need to highlight it anyway,
the point is still relevant, relevant to today,
a beer just reposted it, which I think is important
to highlight these things again,
which is that he deleted this.
Now what does that mean? Do you believe that? Do you not?
Or you just wanna hide the fact that you're genocidal,
that you are in fact acting like an extreme entity
and the person here just saying Google translate
and you can see eliminates Muslims and Nazis.
So you can see that is the one that's responded to.
So very, very, very telling.
Now here's this account just in
case you wanted to check it out.
Let him know what you think. Deputy mayor of Jerusalem,
founder of the Israeli land Fund, I, I can only imagine
that means land theft from Palestinians.
Chairman of the United Faction of Jerusalem City council.
Here are more examples of what they're doing on the ground.
The people like him are absolutely in unsupport of 99.
Johnny Ganz points out the smile
and the little dance he does is chilling.
How does an entire population get like this?
And not only is that just like shockingly childish,
there's no re it's also a crime.
Now, of course, all the Zionists in the chatter saying,
oh, you're just too soft.
And you're, which by the way,
seeing a lot from the Republican conversation today,
we just kind of highlighted that like being, being petty
and small is just supposed to be the right way,
because you're too, you're too sensitive.
. It's like you guys are lo lost the plot.
I only mean the extreme two party illusion.
I think a lot of people in conservative m liberal side,
Democrat, Republican, are seeing through a lot of this.
But this is disgusting
because those are crimes in the
first place, so we should care.
But this is the way they think about it.
It's indicative of the way
that they see all of these people.
That's not Hamas' shop, that's a random Palestinian shop,
and they're destroying it because they hate Palestinians.
Pretty easy to understand.
If this one says, while you were having your coffee,
this one's a little graphic heads up while you're having
your coffee this morning and enjoying the day.
This is what the Zionist did in Rafa. This is from today.
Most of us support this indirectly through the taxes we pay
and the support of our governments,
and by purchasing products from multinational corporations
that support this genocidal regime.
If you don't oppose this, you might be part
of the problem at some point.
Too much silence becomes complicity at this point.
Any silence becomes complicity,
I think.
Get the point. Here's a sad video
that I think is just important
because of what people are going through, you know,
and some of these, I, you know, I question what I mean,
this is graphic obviously,
but not an exploded body, you know, like just so many
of the things that are circulating
and allowed to be there, you know?
But then they censor the context about
what you're talking about in regard to Israel.
The point is that this is a random person.
And here, actually I go, this is, oh, you know what?
Shoot, I wanted to read what, uh, as as, um, what was it?
Uh, uh, Azeri, I forget his name off the top of my head,
what he posted, I guess I can't go back to it.
He just said if there's, you know,
whatever God there is out there.
Like he, this is just too much for him.
It's, it's the, it's the, I think it's Raki.
He's the one that's, he's an Israeli Jew who's been really
highlighting a lot of this stuff.
And he was just saying that, I
just can't deal with this anymore.
And it is, this is, it's disgusting guys.
An infant girl was pulled outta the rubble
of a destroyed home after they
just targeted bil refugee camp.
This was like barely last week, few, four days ago.
A refugee camp for what? The 15th time.
And the point is, this kid runs this baby who's barely still
alive on, with bare feet across what I guarantee is glass
and rubble, and god knows what else to save her life.
There's just so much of this happening guys.
And the shocking thing is that you watch people
down here go like, that's fake.
Which by the way, anything could be fake.
Anything, always something makes, should consider no matter
how serious, no matter how of course anything could be.
The point is that if you pretend like that,
let's just say it was, are you pretending there's not a
thousand examples of children being pulled from rubble?
In fact, what I think is it's so self-evident
that this doesn't need to be made, made up, that there are,
there's people everywhere filming what's going on.
And the disgusting reality is even if you think it might be
people claiming it is without any evidence
because they're trying to hide what's going on,
this is everywhere.
You don't need to make this stuff up right now.
Israeli occupation forces committed five massacres
just in the last 24 hours.
Same thing is posted almost every day from some,
from Gods times of Gaza highlighting,
here's the atrocities from today
leaving 85 people dead and 200 wounded.
Look at this. Look at that picture.
Somehow pretend like this doesn't show you
exactly what you think it does.
This is today. There was a young girl,
a very heart wrenching story who came home
after going to the market, you know, whatever
that might be, some whatever.
They can barely get their hands on at this point,
which we'll talk about at the end, to find out
that the place that she was coming back
to her home was destroyed, and her brothers
and her sisters were all dead, literally sees their bodies
scattered and ripped apart in the street.
What do you think she's gonna grow up to do?
- I was in the market, came home
to find all my brothers and sisters gone.
All of them were killed, ripped to pieces.
Their flesh scattered all over the place.
- Here's another Al Jazeera report.
As Sarah Abdullah reports,
thera Israeli forces started shooting indiscriminately at
Palestinian hilt civilians on their way to school
and work in the occupied West Bank, not Gaza,
in the West Bank, which is part of the story
that gets shockingly little coverage.
How do we explain that? Are we talking about kamas still?
Like this is just something they know.
This exposes the whole thing. It's about Palestine.
A teacher, a surgeon, and two children were all
killed in the report.
Again, I think the same report in regard to three,
but this is what she's reporting.
- We know that Israeli forces in large, uh, vehicles,
large amount of vehicles have raided the Janine area
and the Janine refugee camp at
around 8:00 AM This is a time when Palestinians are trying
to go to their work, to their schools.
This is why according to locals, the seven Palestinians
who were killed, at least six of them are civilians.
The seventh is yet to be identified.
Two of them are minors under 18.
One was a teacher who was going to his school.
And we know now that there are talks to release some
of the children or evacuate some of the children's, uh,
children in a school inside the refugee camp
because of the heavy, uh, confrontations that are going on
between the Palestinian fighters
and the Israeli forces that's yet to be seen.
Also, one of those who have been killed is a surgeon,
a Palestinian surgeon in a hospital in Janine,
who has been mourned by the Palestinian Ministry of Health
who was heading to the hospital to help aid those
who have been wounded according to Palestinians.
There they say that the Israeli forces, soon
as they entered the refugee camp,
they started shooting towards, uh,
Palestinians left, right and center.
And we've heard from the Israeli forces
that they've released a statement soon as they've, uh,
entered the area of Janine
and the Janine refugee camp, which signals
that we are looking at a large operation.
The Israeli army says that they're operating against
what they call terrorists.
But as far as Palestinians tell us that all of those
who have been killed, at least six
of them are civilians just going about their daily lives
when the Israeli raids killed them.
- I mean, this is not hard to see.
I guarantee some of them might actually think
they're or be doing that.
But when you're watching them openly tell you the only
answers destroy all of them, there are subhuman animals
and destroying their homes, burning their houses down.
Are you really gonna debate the fact
that they're also gonna kill the people
that they're telling your terrorists not
differentiating between them.
It's it's narrative from politicians largely the US
that are nail, that are making this illusion
as they literally shoot people in front of them,
including their own people.
Now, here's a good example of what the good guys do, right?
Seize international media equipment
because it's giving you a live shot of Gaza.
This is no joke. Associated Press came out today.
Israel officials seize associated press equipment
and take down live shots of Northern Gaza
citing new media law.
But democracy though press freedom though, right?
Because new laws and stuff, and we, it's all democracy
and judicial independence.
It's ridiculous guys.
These people are everything that they say, they're fighting.
If Iran or China
or Russia did a fraction of the things they're doing, which
by the way will get to in the ICC point,
you know what they would do?
It's straight up dishonesty.
Here is, uh, a White House reporter saying that
or highlighting the statement from ap.
They said, quote, the Associated press decries, the,
in the strongest terms, the actions
of the Israeli government to shut down our longstanding live
feed showing a view into Gaza
and sees associated press equipment, equipment.
It's a crime. No matter how you spin this guys,
they're doing exactly what they would call out if, uh,
if the Palestinians or anybody else did it in reverse.
It says the shutdown was not based on the content
of the feed, but rather abusive use
by the Israeli government
of the country's new foreign broadcaster law.
We urge the Israeli authorities to return our equipment
and enable us to reinstate our live feed immediately
so we can continue to provide this important visual
journalism to thousands of media outlets around the world,
which is obvious to point out exactly what they wanna avoid,
you know, showing you them commit more crimes
and these, and destroying.
I mean, the point is the life feed can be broken down
and you could show the, the, I mean,
just in a quick time fade, you can show
how many things they've destroyed.
They don't want you to see that because they're clearly
committing crimes and they clearly know that
there's no way around that.
And overall, this is also an indication of the lie
of the independent judiciary.
If we're literally passing laws that kind
of circumvent the larger things they claim they're standing
for just in immediacy, trying
to stop the thing they're doing.
That doesn't sound like a legitimate process to me,
and we'll make that point in a minute.
Well, of course, here's what's his name?
Barack Ravi, breaking news.
White House Press secretary, KGP reports
that Biden administration is concerned by reports.
That's it. And he goes breaking news.
The White House is concerned, ,
we all need to laugh at these people.
We need to laugh at the how ridiculous these people are in
government and laugh at the pandering, bowing,
morons out there that act like they're journalists that pan
to do they completely pandre to the power toe the lines,
hide the story and act like they're the breaking
news journalist of today.
Not the reality. And I'm, I'm not even suggesting that I am
or anybody else in independent media,
but you know, I believe that,
I believe independent media has
eclipsed them a long time ago.
This is CNN, Israeli government shuts down,
associated Press live shot.
He writes, obviously only the good guys shut down news,
live streams to hide their actions, right?
Where is some of the compromised
politicians that we've talked about?
Which I don't think there's, I think that's kind of a,
what's the, what's the reverse of a oxymoron
that it's like when it's always the case, you know, saying,
uh, compromised politician is just like saying a politician
as far as I'm concerned, no better case than St
She speaks at the Knesset
and bans the US supports Israel without conditions.
I keep pointing this out.
We just highlighted this the other day.
I'm only showing this to go to the statements that,
oh, wait, wait, it was this one here.
Here's what Michael Tracy said about it.
And I think this is funny because imagine her being the VP
of Trump, and I didn't, I wasn't even aware.
I see, I don't even see this in left and right lenses
because I think that's all of manipulation,
even if they believe it.
So I didn't even, I wasn't even aware that she's Republican.
I think they're all, they're just your government guys.
They're all liars. They're all manipulating,
in my opinion at some level.
But he goes, the Trump VP audition reaches new humiliating,
low Nik self-described ultra MAGA congresswoman goes
to the Knesset and blasts Biden, demand support
for Israel without conditions warns October 7th.
Guess what could happen in the United States?
That's basically a threat.
The idea basically saying that this group
that is focused on Palestinian self-determination
and only acting against Zionist state
and clearly only existing God is somehow
gonna take over the world.
No, no, that's the oza movement that you guys all fund.
That's the Israeli government
with the Great Roosevelt Project
that you're clearly supporting as you're in Jerusalem.
Totally not the group
you're highlighting, but that's the game.
And touts her strong partnership
with Trump, which is funny to me.
And here's what censored Ban says in highlighting this.
Nic speaks and the Knesset
and demands the US support Israel without conditions even
more proof that Congress doesn't serve the United States.
And it's funny, again, this is a state, this is a term
that's been scro deemed antisemitic.
The zog must be abolished. You know what it stands for?
Zionist occupied government. Anyone debating that?
I mean, debating the reality, even going back further,
what Da David, David Eike
and I discussed of Sabo unionism, which is kind of
what was seen as one of the foundational previous
before the Lehi, the Lehigh or Lee Lehe party,
and the, um, I'm blanking on the other one.
The, um, before the real, the kind of foundational elements
of Zionism before that sovereignty is argued to be kind
of the foundational beginnings
of communism, Nazim, and Zionism.
The point is that they were, the major point is
that they would influence and in, in infiltrate governments,
re religions, at least the stated conversations.
And so we're seeing that.
And even if you don't believe any of that, the point is that
how are we gonna ignore that?
You have an obvious overwhelming influence to the point
of occupation of our government.
I've been saying this forever, of course been called racist
for it, but why is it racist to highlight that?
I'm concerned that if you go through our legislation,
and I've, I've, I haven't checked in a long time.
I argue it's probably worse today, long time ago,
made this point in the show, you just skim
through the current legislation that's in,
you know, in flux.
And like any given moment, ha just search
for the word Israel, it's effing everywhere
and it's given give
or take like half the legislation going on for in one way
or another, whether it's some kind of writer stuck in there
or literally involves them for no reason
or highlight something that's against us
or an anti BDS act that's everywhere.
It doesn't that if, I don't care if it was Britain
or Germany, I'd be like, why in the world is half our
legislation involving a foreign country?
But they'd love to make it about racism.
The point is, if you're occupied by another entity
that's controlling your government, which is something
that Zionism is doing, then of course you can call that out.
But not on Twitter because it's
racist. Here's what she said.
- Long as I serve the American people,
I will defend George Washington's vision
of religious pluralism and freedom. She's been,
- This whole time she's really been trying to conflate
patriotism for the American dream
with whatever they claim Israel's doing,
which is just not working
- Today.
This means crushing antisemitism at home.
- Okay, so first of all, she's talking about plural,
like the idea of acceptance.
And we're gonna crush the ones that think like that.
That sounds pretty stupid,
but of course we're talking about racism.
But even then, doesn't free speech protect?
Yeah, yeah, it does. But I guess she
doesn't believe in the constitution.
I'm not saying I accept and, and allow
or, uh, endorse racism.
I'm simply highlighting that if you believe in free speech,
that you have a right to say what you think.
That's real free speech. And that only free speech is ones
that accepts and acknowledges the worst of speech
and that they have a right to it.
And we also have a right to say, you're a disgusting racist
- And supplying the state of Israel with what it needs,
when it needs it, without conditions
to achieve total victory in the face of evil.
- Evil, of course. But we're talking about no conditions
how many times I make this point.
So there's no way to take that any other way.
They can't do anything that would stop it.
They can break the law. They can murder people,
they can do anything they want no conditions.
And it's complete. Which by the way,
is directly contradictory to US law
and international law, but who cares about that?
Go for it. Stefanik
- Chance of death to America are not hollow slogans,
- Which by the way, has been routinely shown
by them themselves to mean the government Zionism
or the us not the people of the country.
They see their power dwindling
and they're desperate to maintain it,
pretending like they're coming after you personally.
No, no, no. They're worried. Same with the ICC.
I saw, uh, Pompeo go, you know,
this ICC is going for Israel.
That means it's coming for Americans next.
No, no, no, it's coming for you next buddy. Not Americans.
And that's the point.
- They are a promise that
what happened here on October 7th could happen in the
United States unless Hamas
and its jihadist accomplices are eliminated. Nope,
- Not even remotely.
That's a gr grasping reach
that is not even ver There's nothing that makes
that point anywhere.
Is it possible? Anything's possible.
But what's far more likely is the entities like the Azab
movement or Israel themselves that have policies openly
stating that they're gonna grow
and take other people's territory, are probably the ones
that are gonna try to take other people's
territory. Just, you know, just a thought.
- And it is the United States high honor
and high responsibility to support Israel's effort.
I have been clear at home and
- It's your responsibility.
So now it's the responsibility of Americans
to support a foreign government's interests.
I don't know how she think this is gonna land with American.
Even the blind supporters of Israel are gonna go, well,
this makes me uncomfortable.
We're talking about something other than,
but you know, right now you can see the,
like the evangelical side of it, the Zionism side of it,
and the people that are believing they have to,
that are lost in this.
But I find most everybody else is beginning, if not long ago
for seeing this, for what it is. I will
- Be clear here, there is no excuse
for an American president to block aid to Israel
- Aid.
We're talking about war, weapons of war being given
to groups that have been accused
of genocide and the world stage.
That alone in any other context, would stop this.
And let, again, even long
before October 7th, they've been violating both
international and US law
by giving them support while they're committing crimes.
They're in apartheid state.
It's, it's discussed
by every major human rights group in the world,
including the United Nations.
Not even, not to suggest they're human rights group.
The point is that's the reality. That alone is a crime
- Aid that was duly passed by the Congress.
There was no excuse to ease sanctions on Iran. Oh,
- And don't forget, he didn't even actually do that.
So this is all a big theater show.
He's paused one shipment and it didn't even stop it.
That was just acknowledged by some, an Israeli, uh, outlet.
They're still going. They didn't stop anything.
And on top of that, I highly doubt they would ever stop it
anyway, even if they pretended to on the surface, paying
- A $6 billion ransom
to the world's leading state sponsor of terror.
- None of that's true. Again, these I I, I bet you,
I bet my life that she doesn't even know any of this.
She's just repeating talking points
that were probably handed to her by Israel.
No, it was not a ransom, it was money that was returned
that they, that the US government seized from Iran.
How in the world do you frame that
as giving them a ransom on top of that, that
of leading state sponsor of terrorism?
So explain for me how, how ISIS had just attacked them twice
and and, and clearly while Israel's highlighting them.
So we're told ISIS is the biggest is terror organization.
That's what we're always screaming about, right?
So if Isis, the biggest group is attacking them,
how in the world can they be the leading
state sponsor of terrorism?
It's just patently stupid.
The Saudi Arabia has the founding concept of Aism
that has become like the founding ideology for all of this.
And yet we don't talk about that. These people are cartoons.
I'm not even gonna say every government is a concern to me.
If Iran was given enough power,
I would probably see it ending
up just like the United States.
The problem is that they are not even factually on the same
page when it comes to what they're actually doing.
The only thing that even remotely looks like
what she's describing is the fact
that the US government has been stomping around the world,
destabilizing countries, raping and pillaging
and stealing from everything it can and screaming democracy.
And that show me where Iran has overthrown a country show
where Iran has done any of the stuff
that Israel and the United States have done.
They point to the Houthis and the, and
and the groups they are supporting.
And even those groups, if you include everything they've
done, does not even begin to overtake what the US alone,
Israel alone have done.
These are verifiable facts.
I'm sorry. They make you uncomfortable
- Or to dither and hide while our
friends fight for their lives.
No excuse. Full stop.
That's why I'm proud to have sponsored
or backed every measure to aid Israel that has come
before the United States Congress. Mm-Hmm.
- every single one of them. Without question.
Literally without question.
- Every single one.
And it's why for years I have been a leading proponent
and partner to President Trump in his historic support.
Mm-Hmm. for Israeli independence
and security. Yeah.
- So what about, what if you're an American
that doesn't wanna support Israel?
Where do you go now? What are you gonna vote for?
Oh, well, the one that says he supports Israel without
conditions but is a little bit less crazy.
That's what I keep hearing. Our fk juniors,
the the only choice, the lesser of evils.
'cause that's the only, if you do
anything else, you're gonna lose.
Let's all just fall back into that hamster wheel.
Guys, I can't believe we're fall for this every time,
- Including moving the US embassy
to its rightful place in Jerusalem.
Jesus Israel is indeed
- You mean the illegal act that he took?
I mean, these people, she, these people have been, become
outwardly acknowledging their criminality.
They just don't say that.
Well, she just acknowledged was something that the world
around acknowledged was illegal.
Not that it couldn't happen,
but that Trump just giving it to them
and them just taking it with no legal process.
There's nothing legal about that.
She doesn't care because as long as it's the benefit
of Israel, we're all supposed to pretend like it's good.
This is crazy to me. This is terrifying.
That these people have power,
- Need a miracle, an outpost of freedom,
of western values of civilization.
Wow. A striking example of human potential.
The physical embodiment of herzl's maxim.
- Yeah, we heard this the other day when I played the clip.
The opening part of it was something we haven't heard.
The idea that she's saying that this is
the living embodiment of everything.
Oh, you know, she just, it's, it's very alarming
that we're talking about a group
that we all can see killing children.
As she said this, they probably killed 10 children.
And we're sitting here acting like this is the shining
beacon of the world.
Any of these could be, if we remove these dangerous
governments, Michael
Tracy highlights something even more disconcerting,
especially when we have people like Brian Mass,
who literally is in the IDF.
He says, holy crap representative guy Russian faller,
a Republican and representative Max Miller, a Republican,
have introduced a bill
that would extend the same tax payer benefits.
So your money to Americans serving in the IDF
as if they were serving in the US military.
Guys, this is so wildly transparent.
There's no way you can pretend that this makes any sense.
So now you're gonna be paying taxes
and you're gonna be giving money to people that are like,
let's say, let's realize that there are Israeli Americans
who say, who are born in Israel,
who have American citizenship, who live in Israel
and fight in the IDF, who will now be getting money from you
on top of the 30 billion
or the, the amount that, well, I think it's like 3.8
that we're supposed to know about every year on top
of the billions we've dumped on them since
October 7th from your pocket.
And we're gonna pretend that that makes sense.
Now, even it's the other way around. Even if it's American
born states that also has Israeli citizenship
and goes to fight in the IDF.
Why is that your responsibility? This is wrong in every way.
It doesn't matter if it's Britain or the Germany
or Israel or anybody else.
You have to say, this is wrong. You can do whatever.
You don't have to do it. I believe this is wrong.
And I want people to recognize why this is wrong.
A se a service of a citizen
of the United States in the Israeli defense forces shall be
treated in the same manner
as service in the uniform services that is unnerving
and realize this is the legislation I'm talking about.
And if people aren't like Michael Tracy,
anybody else aren't highlighting this,
most cases we don't even hear about it.
Take, do the experiment, bring up the u,
the uh, usa, what is it?
Um, congress.gov and search, you know, bring it up for you.
Have all of them an alphabetical order and just search.
The word is real. It'll blow your mind.
This is what we're talking about here is Lindsey Graham
or Michael Tracy highlighting it.
But he says, when it comes to, well, first all,
everybody says I was gonna read mine first, another day
of glorious bipartisan agreement.
He's clearly making fun of it.
Lindsey Graham says, I completely agree
with Senator Schumer.
Can you guess what it's on hate for ICC Israel's our ally.
And he goes, well said, Mr.
President Biden, who, what about, oh, we hate the ICC.
It Israel's our ally. Years ago they tried to come
after US soldiers in Afghanistan.
Yeah, because they were committing war crimes, man.
Last one. I agree with Sandra Blinken, the analysis
of the ICC, right?
As I said, bipartisan agreement.
Well, it always, no matter what, when it comes
to war in Israel, and
of course the US is usually in a war because of Israel.
Funny how that all works out. Here's Mr. IDF himself.
Representative Brian Mast, as I've made this point
before, says there are six Americans in all capitals being
held hostage by Hamas in the Gaza Strip,
assuming they're not killed already by IDF bombings.
But he won't talk about Hamas must be eradicated
and American citizens must be freed.
Well, let's focus on that last part of the sentence.
I said, well, interestingly, you only seem
to care about the Israeli Americans.
Any reason you seemingly do not care about the over 600
Palestinian Americans and their families,
some just Americans trapped in Gaza.
And in no way do I mean that, that they're more important.
But to somebody like him acting like Americans, the
what he's focusing on as an American representative,
we're talking about some of these people
that were there were not Palestinian Americans,
they were Americans that were there
because their Palestinian family.
And they, you know, there's overlap.
Like people like Robert, for example.
My point is, that's a reality.
Here's NPR and plenty of others.
600 Americans estimated to be trapped in Gaza.
That was on October 10th, so forth. They've not left.
There's a, there's been follow ups on this.
Why is it that people like this have not once mentioned
Those Americans, again, some of them just Americans
because they don't care about them if they're on the
Palestinian side or if they're even remotely seen
as Palestinian because they're disgusting.
People just don't know how else you can see that.
Now, we just talked about this, the ICC along with the idea
of the Congo coup, the actually Democratic Republic
of Congo, which is very obvious to me.
We have another example of, you know,
internet intelligence assets being caught
and nobody seems to care about it, is they try
to overthrow another government Iranian crash.
We talked about that. And the idea of that,
really the only follow-up was gonna make on that is
that there's more statements coming out showing you how
anomalous his weather was, just that there was no problem.
And all of a sudden, you know,
I do not think we should be dismissing the possibility
of weather manipulation or electronic warfare
fare, quite frankly.
I think that's what makes the most sense.
But watch this show.
If you wanna get more on that, and I will follow up.
I think Robert's gonna be writing something on it,
but the main point is, as the ICC announces warrant
for Netanyahu and Gland and the Ammas,
but of course his title couldn't fit it all in there.
So watch that show if you
wanna get the follow from yesterday.
But here's the interesting continuing
point from yesterday's show.
First and foremost, let's recognize that they came out
with their, you know, con oops, who the, the lead, the head
of the ICC came out.
And interestingly, as I mentioned earlier, cast, you know,
kind of a even balance of accusations,
even though it was slanted towards a moss,
which doesn't really make sense with seven months
of ongoing murder, 50,000 people.
But the point is that it got attacked from everybody.
Haas was saying, you know, you can't be,
you know, you shouldn't be aiming at us.
And Israel was saying
that you're an illegitimate anti-Semitic Nazi group.
Literally one one N was Zionist, uh, it was,
I think it was Caroline Glick said,
this is literally a neo-Nazi organization.
, like these people just,
they just lost the plot, man.
I mean, it's just, it's incredible.
But Senator Cortez Masto points out, I don't always agree
with Prime Minister Netanyahu,
but for the international criminal court,
to put him on the same footing as the leader
of Hamas is absurd.
Which again, as I said earlier,
is pretty much the only thing that they've all said.
And I'll show you the, the clip of the,
the image, the collage.
But first what Tiberius said,
acting like we can't compare them.
Well, the Israeli occupation forces under Netanyahu half
murdered 25 times as many people in eight months
as amass has in their entire history.
Esp even when you take everything they claim amass has done
at face value, he goes, what metric are you using?
Senator? Could you,
could it be which one gives you more cash?
I love his, he seems to always out,
out ratio these people, which I love.
This is Senate. This is a US senator ignoring these facts,
ignoring this undeniable point.
They have killed more people,
innocent people in eight months than,
and again, the the actual statistic we keep talking about is
then all then all wars over.
What was it? Um, over three
years combined or something like that.
Basically, the point is,
it's astronomically more in this time period than
every other war going on.
And they don't care. Here's the clip I was talking about,
or I mean the collage.
Michael Tracy says, absolutely nowhere
did the ICC prosecutor make an assertion of equivalence
between Israel and Hamas.
He didn't. That's how embarrassing this is.
That clearly somebody somewhere handed all these people a
talking point or otherwise, how in the world we to pretend
that a point that was never made somehow becomes the central
talking point for every US politician.
I know you guys know where this is going.
There's no way to miss that influence, he says,
yet all American politicians can do is refute this
non-existent assertion
of equivalents they've invented rather than do the
unmistakable and address the changes on merit.
On the merits. Excuse me.
The changes, the charges on the merits, meaning
that, did they start people?
How are they killing children? Well, yes, easily verifiable,
but there's just a narrative around,
well, Hamas and human shield.
I think again, Pompeo came out
and said, well, every single death is a Hamas' fault.
You just can't do that. Right?
I mean, the idea that you could say, even if you argue
that Hamas is responsible for starting all of this, what
that really means is you all know how belligerent
and how genocidal Israel is,
and you knew you pushed them, they would do this.
So it's your fault or the argument
that every single one ever killed anywhere.
We're all tied to someone's leg
or held in human shields,
even though we can prove that's not true.
So people like Pompeo are one of some
of the most obvious parts of the problem.
But look at this guys. These are all us politicians.
There's no equivalence between these two.
There's no moral equivalent, there's no equivalence
between every single one of them.
Every one of these guys, the ones you expect, Tim Scott,
Tom Cotton, Waserman Schultz, ab Adam Schiff,
Senator Federman left
and right two, by the way, well,
you see the highlighted for the podcast.
The word equivalence is highlighted everywhere.
Every single one of them makes this point.
Even though nobody ever said that, except them.
Where'd that come from you? It's obvious.
And this person says Adam Schiff called it right?
I think this is funny. This is
what he said in his tweet up there, a false equivalence
between a Democratic government and a terrorist group.
And he says, maybe arrest warrants
of the whole Israeli government would've been better.
So what do they keep saying about Hamas? They were elected.
The people elected them. We can't have that.
Well, guess what? That's, that's
what you call a democratic elected
government, even if you don't like them.
And then we're watching the Israeli military
murder people at large.
So I think we're, I think he's right.
You can't make a false equivalence
between the Democratic government
and this terrorist organization murdering Palestinians.
That's the point he's making. Maybe arrest warrants
for the whole government would've been better, frankly.
I agree. And again, despite the obviousness
of my statements, nobody here is arguing that every Israeli
or every Jew is somehow accountable.
That's stupid. But here's what John Bolton says.
You know, John Bolton, who is already on the record
for threatening the families of the same court,
the same international criminal court.
Same with Pompeo, by the way.
He says, I'm happy to see Congress moving toward imposing
sanctions on the ICC, which is what they're going for.
He says, I proposed this during my time
as National Security Advisor.
We must dish out consequences on the ICC if it's going
to come after the US and our allies.
That's it. You just general,
you're not allowed to hold us accountable.
We'll come after you. Classic, classic John Bolton.
Well, here's Mike Pompeo targeting Israel is the first step
before the ICC comes after Americans.
That's what I was mentioning before. I forgot I included it.
No, no. As I said, they're coming after you buddy.
That's, you're the American. You think they're not us.
And I think you, Dan will know that they're terrified
that they'll be next on the top, on the chopping block.
I mean, I shouldn't, I don't know for sure these people,
I think some of them just don't care.
Some of them are sociopathic.
My point though is that I get the sense,
I should say more accurately, that people like this
genuinely begin to recognize that, you know, not
that they think it's an eminent thing,
but far more likely than they think
they've ever recognized before.
All it takes is one strong turn and it could be you next.
I think they sense that.
So that's what he is trying to push.
Get all the Republicans charged up.
And we can't let international body come after Americans.
That's not what's actually happening.
The Biden administration should immediately sanction the
corrupt and anti-Israel ICC.
That's all you got. That's all they got.
And even start Pierce, uh, Syrian girl.
Are you worried for yourself? Exactly.
Now what's funny is you got Bolton chiming in all
of a sudden go after the ICC go
after their families just eo, but go after the ICC.
Looks like the old band's getting back together. Huh?
Get ready for another Trump administration.
Here is Matt Miller highlighting in a very,
very bad, clumsy way.
I mean, Matt Miller just,
or excuse me, uh, um, Matt Lee just went
to town on this guy in this clip.
It's great. I, I'll just let it speak for itself.
It's about exactly what we're talking about.
- States fundamentally rejects the announcement today from
the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
that he is applying for arrest warrants
for senior Israeli officials together with warrants
for Hamas terrorists.
The United States has been clear since, well
before the current conflict
that the ICC has no jurisdiction over this matter.
- So are you okay then with the, um, application
for arrest warrants against Hamas?
- Uh, we do not believe that they have jurisdiction over
either of the parties of this
- Conflict.
So don't you don't think
that Hama we leaders should be prosecuted?
- We absolutely believe that
Hama should be held accountable.
That could be accountably. Hold on.
Let, let, lemme, lemme finish. Okay.
That could be either through the prosecution of,
of the war effort by Israel. It could be,
- In other words, being killed on. Let
- Me, it could be by being killed.
It could by being be, it could be by being brought
to justice in Israeli court. We do not believe the
- Right there he is saying, you killed them
or let the government try to kill them.
Pretend to hold 'em accountable.
That's the process he thinks should happen. Right now,
- ICC has jurisdiction over either
of the parties. In this case
- It does verifiably.
So I'll show you that next. That's, that's, that's,
this is a shocking lie by him
because ev it's very well acknowledged
by the ICC in Palestine
that at the very least the
ICC recognizes the state of Palestine.
They don't get to step into that
despite their crying about it.
So the point is that here he's lying,
a boldface, boldface lie. And he knows that
- Because the Palestinian people do
not represent a state. Okay? That
- Includes, they do though - It's the, the leaders of,
- But obviously the administration is also troubled
by actions that Israel has taken Postoc October 7th.
So where, where, where's the accountability for that? Where?
Mm-Hmm. . Do the Palestinians go
to seek redress?
- First of all, in the short term, with respect to questions
of war crimes, Israel does have open investigations.
Uh, a number of open investigations.
We, uh, made this public when we, how embarrassing.
When we released our report on National Security Memo 20,
including some investigations
that have become criminal investigations into conduct
by members of the IDF.
- 75 years of this nonsense should be enough, right?
Where the occasional person briefly goes into some jail
and it gets pardoned 30 seconds
later when no one's paying attention.
If that ever happens, most of them just walk right away.
And nobody says a word. That's the, I mean,
it's shockingly obvious. That
- Is the first instance for, for judging.
Um, whether someone has committed, uh, a war crime
or a violation of IDF, uh, uh, code of conduct.
That's one of the reasons why we have
concerns about the ICC.
The ICC is set up to be a court of last resort.
If a country isn't properly holding itself
and its personnel accountable,
that's when the ICC comes in. Not
- Now.
That itself is sort of a sidestep,
but I'm gonna make, I'm just gonna let that stand
and make the point that it's provable
that they do not have an independent judiciary
- In the middle of the process.
As they have, as they have done here.
We believe that there should be the establishment
of an independent Palestinian state,
and an independent Palestinian state would have the ability
to join the Rome statute
and, uh, uh, become a member
of the International criminal Court as every state in the,
the world has the right to do.
- Now here's the, here's the great game he's playing. Okay?
So you're saying, well, they're not,
so we can't pretend this makes sense, but we want them to.
And once that happens, then they can,
okay, well, what's been stopping that?
Oh, that's right. You in Israel. So you're making sure they
don't ever get the thing that will allow them to pretend
to be a part of the process that
you'll never acknowledge anyway.
How dumb is that on top from the very beginning?
What would, what did we hear in the beginning?
Well, we can't let you have a
state because we'd starve the world.
Then that's how we'd stop it.
So, showing you that already,
they know they would try to stop it if it happened.
And he's saying, well, we have that happen
so they can have the rights to do this.
This is how they play the game. It is shockingly dishonest.
And on top of that, we know
that this all the different conversations about ceasefires
and agreements that would lead to that.
They're also trying to stop.
These people are the most obvious example
of criminals that I can see.
- But that's, but that's, but that their SOL
that is not what No, no.
- So where do they go in - The meantime?
They're not sol I said, first of all,
the Israel has its own investigations.
Second, we have, uh, accountability mechanisms here.
We have, uh, processes that are ongoing to look,
- This is the best part.
So we step into something there.
Oh, so, so the US government is,
is one of the processes here.
And and why exactly are you able to do
that in Palestine or Israel?
- Look at Israel's compliance
with international humanitarian law.
So there are places to look at these questions.
It's just in our, in our view,
fundamentally not a role of the ICC. So
- Let's just focus on jurisdiction for a second.
Who does have jurisdiction here?
- So the governor of Israel has, uh, jurisdiction over
- Occupied. We have
- Jurisdiction - Over, over Gaza, which is not entirely,
- They have - Jurisdiction.
See, he skipped, I, this is a point
that most people didn't, he skipped right past this.
Matt Miller jumped right over this.
Recognize the contradiction.
So wait a minute, it's not occupied
and they can do what they want, but we have jurisdiction
over them and we can rule on them
and tell you if they're guilty.
Yeah, that's because you have it.
You're occupying the territory
and you have complete control of everything they do.
It's just so dumb how they play this game.
It's all right there on the surface
- Into looking at, at, uh, the actions, okay? By their
- Military personnel policy means if they have a complaint,
they have to bring it to Israeli courts.
- We, they, we have jurisdiction and we, which
- They would don't know that they wouldn't allow that.
They're not, they're not gonna allow
with the people they're calling Hamas to have some kind
of process through their courts.
They're killing people. That's what they're doing. Yeah. Uh,
- You have jurisdiction with the use of our equipment. I'm
- Sorry, hold on. Sorry,
- I I wanna make sure you hear that
correctly. This part's important.
- Fundamentally not a role of the ICC.
- So let's just focus on jurisdiction for a second.
Who does have jurisdiction here?
- So the governor of Israel has, uh, jurisdiction over
- The occupied. We have
- Jurisdiction - Over, over Gaza, which is not entirely,
- They have jurisdiction to looking at, at, uh,
the actions by their
- Military personnel.
Policy means if they have a complaint, they have
to bring it to Israeli reports.
- We, they, we have jurisdiction
and we ha uh, you have jurisdiction
with the use of our equipment.
- I'm sorry. How do you have
- Jurisdiction with the use of our
military equipment, Matt, that we have
- Provided?
Matt, how do you have jurisdiction?
- If you look at the Lehey law, if you look at that,
- That's ju that's not jurisdiction in a criminal
process. That's jurisdiction, not
- The criminal process.
But it has to do with, uh, the determinations
that we make in the policies that flow
- From it. But it's not jurisdiction. So,
- But Matt, long, - Just skip it.
Just skip it. Like just then I just got called out.
Just skip past it. Clearly we're talking about criminal
jurisdiction because we're talking about court of law
and charging them for crimes.
So you just point to something, it has no relevance to
that point, and then just jump past it.
I just, who cares? This is, this is my point.
This guy is good at this job.
He's, and, and, and even now, he's doing
so much better than you would ever imagine KJP trying
to fumble through this or even viel for that matter.
And this is how bad it looks
because they have nowhere to step.
They have lost. Doesn't mean it's gonna change,
but should, if there's anything justice in the world
- Term, you were right that we wanna see you
- Used to work for DOJ, Matt, Ron,
there's no us not have jurisdiction.
- There are different, I wasn't referring
to criminal jurisdiction, Matt.
There different ways to look at this long term. We
- My point.
So why even bring it up? 'cause
you're trying to water it down. I agree
- With you that the Palestinian people should be a state
that has the, and have the ability
to make these determinations.
But that's not where we are today.
That's where we're trying to get to.
- Hardly you are. So they're gonna maintain
that stagnant middle of the ground area
and act like we're doing our best,
even though everything you're doing on reality is making
sure it never comes to pass, so
that you can make those statements
- Fine with the ICC going after Russia.
Russia in no time flat.
- Don't miss that. He, he didn't, he didn't call on him.
But Sam Hussein, he says, well, you were fine going
after Russia immediately.
Guess what? Russia is not a signatory on the ICC.
Oops, contradiction. Earlier
- Today, secretary Blinken issued a statement announcing
that based on information that is currently available,
the US government assesses
that Russia's forces are committing war crimes in Ukraine.
We welcomed the fact, and
- By the way, that's while it's still ongoing,
the argument they claim they can't do over here in Israel
because it's still ongoing. The fact
- That the new incoming prosecutor
of the international criminal court has also opened an
investigation into the situation within Ukraine in terms of
- The county, which of course they support, right?
So now you're saying it's okay for the ICC to go
after this group that we don't like,
even though they're not part of the ICC.
But over here you can't because they're not part of the ICC.
Yeah, that's it. Complete contradictory
- Accountability.
Talk about the fact that Israel has open investigations.
So what kind of timeline did Israel provide you
to conclude those investigations?
- So we have made clear to Israel
that those investigations ought to proceed expeditiously.
- Okay, so how long they said, look,
we, we said they should go fast.
It's not an answer. The point is that most
of these investigations allegedly
started the first couple weeks.
Nothing has happened.
Now, what's actually happened if you look into it,
is Israel's already made the statement probably
that they, they made the car argument.
They'd investigate that we don't need to,
'cause we already know where, like this taking like the
flower Masker, for example, what did they say?
He said they're gonna investigate.
And they came out and said, no, we didn't.
We already did and we're not guilty.
And then a week later though,
well, there's gonna be an investigation.
They already came out and said, we know we're not guilty.
We're we already did our investigation.
This is a game of lies.
So what he's doing right now is just giving you ambiguous
statements to make it seem like we're in the process
of all these investigations that will never go anywhere.
And most of which they've already claimed they finished.
Guess what? They're not guilty.
- They ought to reach con conclusions as soon as possible.
And have they provided you a I'm not gonna,
I'm not gonna speak to our internal discussions
for the Israeli government, but everyone,
it is very difficult always to put a timeline on any kind
of investigation, certainly on a criminal investigation.
And I wouldn't wanna do that on behalf
of the foreign government other than to say, no,
- God no.
Can't do that. Our expectation except Russia or China
or Gaza
or all the rest of the ones you don't like, but God, we can't do that here
- On behalf of the United States, is
that they should proceed and finish as soon as possible,
but not at the expense of thoroughness.
- Of course not because it's gotta be thorough, right?
Even though it ended six months ago.
But you gotta be thorough. So it might take seven more years
and then by the time we get there, we'll change.
You know, this is constant great job on Descented news.
They're always breaking this stuff down
and here's going forward on the same, uh, same segment.
Here's Ben Rhodes highlighting what is, what the mo one
of the most obvious things we can point out,
but it's still worth highlighting.
There is no such thing as a rules-based international order.
If the rules only apply to people
and countries you don't like.
Some people need these things to be pointed out to them.
Now here's the same clip, by the way, a little
slightly different clip, but same conversation, Craig, uh,
hyber simply points out Miller is openly lying here.
We'll point, we'll make this point in a second.
Palestine has been a clear
and stated member of the ICC since 2015 unequivocally,
the ICC jurisdiction over acts committed on Palestinian
territory has long been confirmed.
They just don't like it. They dispute it,
but they don't have the right to stop it.
It's clear they've already made their agreements.
Palestine is part of the ICC,
which does then give them jurisdiction over Gaza,
but also crimes committed against them in Gaza by Israel.
That was an interesting way.
They played this a long time ago and it worked well.
Yet another case of the US trying
to undercut international law on behalf
of its oppressive foreign ally while
screaming about international law.
Owen Jones highlights claims
that the ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel by the likes
of the UK government, are a joke.
'cause the UK's doing the same thing.
Russia isn't a signatory to the ICC either,
but the ICC was granted jurisdiction.
Ukraine, just as it is, has jurisdiction in Palestine.
They welcome Putin's arrest case closed.
These are liars guys in the double standards.
At the very least. He says, what's outrageous is
that Joe Biden knowingly supplied weapons
to a state he was clearly aware was committing war crimes on
an industrial scale.
So outrageous in fact
that he has forever secured his place in the
history books as genocide.
Joe again, highlighting Barack rabid saying the I ccc,
you know, just towing lines playing the
corporate journalist to a t.
Now here, Michael Johanna points out a very interesting
statement made by Kareem Kahan from the ICC.
He says, A senior official told him, quote,
the court was built for America, or excuse me, for Africa
and thugs like Putin.
Oh, it's how he says it.
I think that's how it's supposed to be said.
But I still say Putin point is that's a moment
of like, I don't know why
he's putting these things out there.
It's causing, causing him to get attacked by the people
that I think are ultimately bo like able to remove him.
I don't mean, I mean that in the most dishonest sense,
but definitely still the truth that
they're admitting the reality.
We only made this so you could go
after the people we don't like.
That's the truth of it all. Listen to it from his own mouth
- Of the individual is the protection of babies.
I mean, these are fundamental American values
that should engender bipartisan support.
Now of course, this situation unfortunately, uh,
lies on the San Andreas fault of international politics
and, um, strategic interests.
And of course I've had some elected leaders, uh, speak to me
and, uh, very be, you know, be very blunt.
This court is built for Africa
and for thugs like Putin was
what one senior leader, uh, told me.
- Now, who do you Madden said that, I mean,
I can't see anybody but us
or Israel making those
statements to him, but that's my opinion.
- Um, we don't view it like that.
This court is the legacy of Nuremberg.
This court is a sad indictment of humanity.
This court should be the triumph of law over power
and brute force grab.
- I also have a hard time letting him stand there
and grandstand about his righteousness seeing us
how he's let this go on for a very long time.
You realize these have been obvious for most people
or for, I shouldn't say today, it's obvious to most people,
but for a long time it's been obvious to those being able,
you know, to able to be on the, the nonsense
and propaganda that the 75 years of ongoing occupation,
the crimes have knocked one
and two, the ongoing crimes against humanity being carried
out and that amnesty human rights watch bet sell a state
of apartheid, like been a long time
where he has been nothing.
So that's why a lot of us question the intentions here.
Either way, it's still have a positive effect,
but just be skeptical there.
- What you can take what you want, do what you will.
And, uh, we are going to simply be un uh,
we're not gonna be dissuaded by threats
or any other activities
because in the end we have to, uh, fulfill our
responsibilities as prosecutors, as the men
and women of the office, as judges, as the registry to some
- Here another, uh, Owen Jones Post says,
I have a Twitter list which follows the tweets
of almost all mainstream political journalists.
Only a tiny number have tweeted about the international
criminal court chief prosecutor.
Now he wrongly says issuing arrest warrants,
they only announce them.
It hasn't been issued yet. And that's
what the fact check on Twitter is about.
But he goes absolutely wild.
And I completely agree with him.
Now, I I I'm pretty sure that he was at least w recently
before, I think I, I haven't been following his career,
but I believe he was part of the Guardian
that looks like he's now independent, which probably
because of all the stuff he's
saying that challenges the mainstream.
Remember he was the one that came back after viewing that,
um, snuff film
that they called the October 7th documentation
that was track full of manipulations that he came out
and said it didn't prove anything.
They didn't show any of the stuff they claimed they were
gonna prove and called the journalists in the UK
and the us and they both were there.
And they said, yeah, we didn't see it either.
I think that has was probably one of the reasons,
in my opinion, any case, he's simply saying
that his li his link to this group shows that very few
of them have tweeted about the International Criminal Court
announcing warrants against leaders
of the Israeli government.
I don't care if you agree with it or not,
that's obviously newsworthy.
And they didn't even tweet about it.
And he says, this will be a moment
of panic in British newsrooms.
Now, I think in any newsrooms, in my opinion,
that have towed these lines, media outlets will be aware
that they legitimized a terrible crime,
that they whitewashed Israel's war crimes,
that they demonized everyone
who stood against a historic crime.
What does that say about their legitimacy?
Now what I read that is not necessarily the
knowing complicity, right,
but the people within it, the supposed journalist
that blind themselves to what they're part of, you know,
the things Alison Morrow have revealed everybody
that they knowingly omit things and about to certain topics
and just keep willfully ignorant that this might be
that moment where they just can't
hide it from themselves anymore.
Maybe he's right. In any case,
they're not telling you the truth.
Craig Mo Hyber also points out the ICC prosecutor delayed
action on Israel crimes for years
and then took limited action against only two perpetrators
for a few crimes out of many.
And still the US threatens him
and Israel smears him as an antisemite.
International officials took note.
Appeasement does not work.
It's like the woke mob conversation.
What happens when you bow and say, fine, I was wrong.
They attack you even harder.
It's the same point we're talking about the idea
that he is high.
I mean, he's, he barely did anything and they're going
after him like he was the biggest antisemite in the world.
It's because they're desperate,
because it's obvious this is going against what they want
and this is all they have.
But the point is, it should have been the
most, it should have been legitimate.
It should have been, we're accusing the group committing
genocide of the obvious crime of genocide.
And the idea of accountability for
what happened on October 7th does not rise to the level
of the ICC despite the way they wanna frame it.
Especially since we know, as a matter of fact, that a lot
of the people were killed by the IDF.
You just can't decouple those things as well as the fact
that there was an incredible amount of foreknowledge,
which continues to open the door to the fact
that at some level this was allowed to happen.
All these things are supposed to be so unspeakable.
The truth is the evidence backs
it up more than anything else.
You can show. We've gone over these in different shows.
Now, this is interesting in regard to showing you the kind
of man, the, the, the, the reason Pompeo's of the world
and bulletins will say these things.
This the squirrel points out.
In 2002, the US signed the Hague in Invasion Act into law,
which states that if the us any US
or NATO official is charged
with a war crime doesn't matter whether it's justified guys
at the ICC, the US will invade
and destroy the city in court.
Now watch them include Israel to the list very soon.
He's, I completely think he's right.
And the point is this is, this is right here.
US Hague Invasion Act becomes law.
The new law supposedly protecting US service members from
the International Criminal Court for the podcast
that is on human rights watch shows
that the Bush administration will stop at nothing in its
campaign against the court.
And it goes on to make the same point.
It's just not legitimate guys. This is 2002.
But it goes on to highlight the Netherlands is in nato.
So the US signed a law enabling it
to invade another NATO country
and destroyed an independent judiciary institution,
judicial institution, if it ever
dares, investigate its war crimes.
And they will soon expand it to include Israel.
He's highlighting John Heimer here with an important, he,
he says, an important truism confirmed again recently
with the killing of the Western aid workers
and American doctors and nurses trapped in hospitals.
He says, if I visited Israel
and I was killed, would there be any accountability?
There wouldn't be. These Israelis can do
almost anything and get away with it.
I'll show you a clip of him again next, more current.
But he goes on and highlights this clip,
which we've seen already of him saying that.
They said, it's just for Africa and, and Putin.
He also highlights this clip
of a re resign a US State Department member who resigned
because in protest over what's happening.
And remember the clip he talks about here?
The point in this clip was that he was investigating,
basically, I'll just read it again.
He says, um, including charges of sexual violence
and captivity ,
but not against Israeli leaders
who actually mass rape Palestinian hostages.
Because Zion, he says Zionist rape
Palestinian children is normalized.
The point is, in this clip,
this is a state department member
who was talking about the reality of children being raped
and highlights this and brings it to the attention.
And this is an Israeli group brings it
to the attention of the government of Israel.
And what, what they later did was invade that area,
arrest the people that told the story,
shut down the conversation and allow,
and nobody was held accountable for it.
And he's reporting this and,
and he was left going, what are you talking
that you just covered up rape?
And one of the many reasons why he later resigned.
But this was postoc October 7th.
That was the kind of the final straw.
The squirrel says, imagine if the ICC when they charged
Putin with war crimes to enthusiastic
and celebration of the Western media
and political class also included charges
for the oav Nazi leaders like the head
of their military and deputy foreign minister.
And I think it's same point I was making
before, it's clear that this is a one-sided act
and should you go
after them, they'll invade,
they'll use their own military Midas right mentality
to just shut you down.
Ben Swan posted this, this is today the argument
that it's ethically correct
to support Israel has been wrong.
Well before October 7th, professor John Myer, uh,
Meir Schumer, Shimer mis maybe mispronouncing it explains
how the Israeli lobby is the main reason
for us support for Israel.
He says, Israel is not a strategic asset.
It's a strategic liability
and its behavior towards the Palestinians
as morally reprehensible.
This point is important.
There is nothing strategically, there's no asset to this.
It's dumping at you, you your tax dollars,
your funding your weapons,
and going to war for the action they're creating
or the, the justification they're using
or the manufactured threats they're putting forward.
It's the US as well. But realize that's,
there's no asset there.
It's in fact in everything.
It's doing more insecurity for both Jews
and Americans and Christians and everything else.
Muslims, all of it
- Meant that it's ethically correct
to support Israel against the Palestinians, has been wrong
for a long, long time, well before October 7th.
And the real reason that we support Israel is
because of the lobby, not because of strategic
or moral logic.
And once the lobby is out in the open
and you see the, uh, the lobby wielding its influence
- Like right now - And sort of, uh, uh,
very heavy handed ways that works
to undermine the argument that Israel, uh,
and the United States are close together
for strategic and moral reasons.
Because you wouldn't need a lobby, right?
If there were strategic and moral reasons.
Good point for a close relationship,
the reason you need a lobby is
because Israel's not a strategic asset.
It's a strategic liability
and its behavior towards the Palestinians is
morally reprehensible.
And I wanna be clear, it has been for a long period of time,
this is not something that started on October 7th.
So to deal with this situation, you need a lobby,
but it's again, best if that lobby is in the background.
Uh, and it is not any longer in the background.
- And what's important about that too is that it,
so now it's no longer in the background now, right?
But they've made, they've become aware of that.
And so that's why you now see this massive promotional push
pointing out these posts on Twitter that look at this,
you know, basically highlighting what we would
otherwise show in trying to turn it for their benefit.
Every single one of the people
that we support was elected, look at that.
It support you. Good. We're like, yes, exactly, ,
that's exactly what we're highlighting.
And it point, it's, it's not working.
The point is that it doesn't, it's the only effort is
to make it seem like we hate Jewish people
because we're highlighting that a foreign entity, which is
what it really is, is influencing foreign
policy of the United States.
Now, of course, the argument which is technically correct,
is this is an American entity that was created
by people in this country to support the foreign country,
which is the only way you somehow circumvent the Farah Act.
And so you have to re register as a foreign entity, right?
Saying that it was started here.
But we have to realize there has been a long sought effort
to infiltrate and create these things
as we've highlighted going back well before the create.
I mean the idea of the current state of things today, it,
the, the Zionist entity has done this countless times.
And we have to recognize
that we're talking about other groups that have been created
for the interest of seeding the country with interest
for Israel at the expense of Americans.
That's not about racism. It's about a country,
whether it be China or Russia,
which everybody else can care about.
Like the point is from the partisanship,
the same arguments are made about China.
Are we racist against China? In some cases, people are.
My point is that to say
that about China strategically manipulating policy
to benefit them at the,
our expense is not about race, is it?
It's about countries vying for power.
So when you say Israel's doing that, suddenly you hate Jews.
That's the stupidity of all this.
It used to work, but
because of what they've done, they've made that clear.
Now Sam Husseini points out something in that same vein,
which is really interesting about Saudi Arabia normalization
and all that info.
He says the, the Saudi Re the Saudis
and nine 11 will get more mainstream in proportion
to their not going along so much with the Israeli genocide.
Just a guess. He says, I think
that's a really excellent point.
So down here he is just this,
this person just highlighting the Atlantic.
Just put this out on the 21st court filing. Wow.
Court filing show that senior representatives
of the Saudi government were much,
much more involved in nine 11 than previously thought.
Now this is a dead end in the first place.
Guys, we have to understand, I mean, there's parts
of the story here, but if you need to check out, uh,
let me just grab it for you at least.
Our, our watch along this one right
here, the history, secret history of Al-Qaeda.
And this is an amazing, uh,
Corbet three-part documentary it a load for me.
And we, we, we watched all three of 'em that are watch along
and comment here and there, you know, pretty briefly though,
but comment on some of the parts
beginning and end and why it's important.
I mean, it's, every time I've seen
this, I've seen it more than once.
It's always mind blowing to me how clear this is.
The receipts are there. It's, it's an
American proxy army with Israel as well.
It's an Israeli American proxy army that's been used
to basically create
justification for all the things they've done.
It's far deeper than that.
But the point is that you need to understand that.
And what he's saying is all
of a sudden the Atlantic really the Atlantic is writing a
story about how, look at that, the group
that they've ki you know, basically the whole narrative is
that Saudi Arabia was involved, you know,
there was seven outta nine were Saudis.
And, but yet weirdly their chief allies of Saudi Arabia,
like it's all this weird game that's played,
even though the truth is far,
far more obvious than Saudi Arabia hijacking a plane
with some fox cutters.
It's such a terrible story.
Which again, there's elements of this,
but the point, the real story is far, far more obvious
and deeper than is deep than that.
But the point is, all of a sudden,
why is Atlantic riding this going?
Look at this. They're actually more involved than you think.
I agree with Sam. It's a threat.
Starting the ball rolling, right?
In other news, Biden's about to oblige US soldiers to die
and kill for the Saudi dictatorship.
The point that this information will become out more
and more depending on how more
or less they support the genocide.
Well, guess what? He's absolutely right.
This is from the 21st. Netanyahu denies
Israeli Gaza resettlement.
Oh, damnit, damn, these things drive me crazy.
This this updated just now.
Damn, it's frustrating. I should have taken a screenshot.
So I've been noticing that with these Hart's articles.
They, they do these live ones
and they literally change the,
the entire thing changes the headline.
Even if you have it up, it changes on its own.
Lemme see if it says it up here. Damn it.
That's so frustrating. The point
was, I can't remember that title.
And we made the whole point here
that ultimately Israel already Netanyahu spoke up
and said ultimately about the same conversation
that he's unwilling to normalize with Saudi Arabia
because they are supporting Palestine or
because they're not supporting what they're doing
in Palestine or Gaza.
Dammit, that drives me crazy.
Anyway, see, I can't even go back or anything.
It's just stuck there. Now let me see.
Lemme try one search for it,
See if it pops up somewhere.
Yep. Perfect. Damn it. Glad we found it. Stupid damn harass.
It says net always says it is real
near as normal as No, that's old.
That son of a gun. That's an old one.
Let me do the one last try
and we'll, and we'll finish up here.
Let's go past week.
I ccc likely to prosecute in Yahoo. Shoot.
I know that I didn't spell that right.
I know, I know those of you that watch this show, which
by the way, make sure you confirm it for yourself
'cause anybody can make mistakes.
But I know that you guys know that
that's not something I would make up.
But nonetheless, for people that might not know that,
I wanna make sure that that point brought it all together.
Here we go. Five days ago,
Saudi normalization could abort Israel's Rafa operation
but not solve gaza's troubles.
Now that's not the same article, but you get the same kind
of the contradiction to Saudi Arabia
and the normalization that they're trying to achieve,
which is not really the interest of anybody,
but Israel is kind of up in the air
because of their, at least not wholehearted support
of Israel and what they're doing.
So that's my ultimate point, is it's already flushing out
to be true that they're already seeding these things going,
wait a minute, oh, it
might be a little more than you thought.
And Saudi Arabia's gonna pick up on that
and go, well shoot, we don't want them to really turn the,
the four, the war on terror focused us, right?
So here's what Lindsey Graham just said,
and this goes into the the point we were gonna make
of this last part of the segment in regard to the claim
of why the ICC shouldn't be able to do this.
He says, well first of all,
this is the statement from Joe Biden.
You know, even at every other point when it's not about War
Israel, these two were you, we hate each other.
But now well said Mr.
President, the ICC is going rogue again.
Years ago they tried to come
after US soldiers in Afghanistan.
It's the point we captioned earlier
and now they're coming after Israel.
Like there's somehow an equivalence there
and it says the most robust democracy in the Middle East.
That's what he just said. That's stupid as that
with an incredibly independent judiciary.
That's the point we're gonna get into.
The reason he says that is
because that's the top, the main point
for why the ICC shouldn't be doing this, at least right now,
even though they allowed it to happen
with the Russia who's not a member
who is in the middle of a war.
Both points are the same,
but oh they, we can do it to Russia.
They say, well if they have an independent judiciary
that's capable of investigating itself,
that's not the place for the ICC.
Well let's make the point that they don't.
The ICC he continues, has far exceeded its mandate.
I look forward to working in the bipartisan way
with the administration of Congress to sanction the ICC
and it's outrage against Israel.
E Equally important, we must also put sanctions in place
to protect American personnel from any future actions.
Yeah, 'cause Exactly. 'cause it's not like American people
can commit crimes overseas
that your government doesn't acknowledge, you know,
like illegal occupations and invasions
and, uh, destruction, rape, murder, pilly,
all the things we know that have happened that have now come
to pass because people from Iraq war have spoken up
and acknowledged I was ordered to rape those people.
We were ordered the steal, we took things.
Yes, it happened, guys, that's a big
story by the way, if you don't remember.
And the point is that, well,
let's just take Guantanamo Bay for example.
The point is that this is put in place so you can't go
after them because they claim, well,
they held themselves accountable, but they clearly did not.
Now here's my point. The Council
of Foreign Relations highlights this of course from 2023.
They wouldn't point it out right now.
Israeli judicial reforms, what to know.
And the point is it's highlighting,
it says the Knesset passed legislation
that abolishes the reasonable doctrine.
This is in 2023. It's already happened,
which the Supreme Court of Israel employed
to evaluate government policies.
It is a practice used by high courts in Australia, Canada,
United Kingdom among other countries.
The doctrine of reasonable doctrine
operates exactly as it sounds.
Now, I'm not even remotely saying this is an
honest practice or that they do the right thing.
My point is that this is what they're highlighting.
Lindsey Graham is pointing to the group like Supreme Court
and their judiciary and saying it's independent,
meaning it's not run by the
government and the people that are accused.
It's saying the doctrine operates exactly as it sounds.
The court determines whether a given government policy is
sensible and sound.
For example, when prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
you know, the criminal that he is
and the entire government,
Israeli society has openly called out,
he himself being charged with bribery
and all sorts of crimes
that I guess you could put on hold while he is at war.
That seems to never end.
Sort of like with the US government.
He says sort of like the example when he appointed
a party leader as minister of finance, except
that party leader was not eligible to serve
because he was convicted of bribery, fraud
and breaches of trust and money laundering.
'cause you, that's what you want in finance, right?
Because the point is he wants the criminal,
who will the CRI be criminal?
He will act in with criminality just the way that he wants,
sort of like the proxy elements they fund around the world,
the craziest, most extreme that'll just
do whatever you want because of money.
Not the ones that will do the things you pretend you want,
that won't let you take over their country.
Right? That's the funding of Hamas
and everything they talk about in the past.
The point is the Supreme Court said, no, you're not allowed
to do that because he's not eligible.
And the now they've passed a law
that says you can't do that anymore.
Now the Knesset has made that type
of judicial oversight impossible.
It is conceivable that this person could become the minister
of finance even though he's convicted of bribery, fraud,
breach of trust, money laundering and various tax offenses.
That makes sense, right? It's also possible if the
annexation of parts of the West Bank will now proceed,
given which they have given that they didn't, they, uh, that
by dint of the legislation,
the Supreme Court is limited in its ability
to be a check on the government's power.
You know, the exact thing that they're talking about.
Here's the times of Israel, which now the highlight is gone.
I'm gonna just kind of jump past it time as well.
But this is from 2018.
Without an independent judiciary,
Israel's cherish democracy will be at risk.
Now this what she's highlighting in this,
and this was a, um, a lecture in Jerusalem of the se uh,
senior judge of the can of, of on, uh,
the senior judge on Canada Supreme Court who spoke up
and said, if this comes to pass, you know this,
that's already happened in 2023,
we won't have an independent judiciary.
Oops, . So here, we're already there.
It's already very self-evident
and other Supreme Court entities have spoken up
and said, if that happens, it won't be.
And we're there now. Okay.
Just to make that clear and just
so we make it even more clear, here's a couple
of PBS articles saying the impact of Israel's governments.
And this brings us to
where I was talking about in the beginning about
where they've come to right
before October 7th, the judicial reforms,
which was why they were protesting before that.
And what you're seeing in this picture is the idea
of spraying Israeli protestors
because they're protesting against something they know is a
criminal act and that people are aware of.
You're trying to push in something,
not just the judicial reforms that allow you to over
to circumvent the Supreme Court,
which means it's not an independent judiciary,
but also the whole, the theocratic overlap is the idea
of these like religious overtones that allow them
to do things that are like, the point is there's a lot
that we're trying to shift that takes it away from even
pretending to be a democracy, even though
that's never been what it actually is.
At least not for Palestinians
or basically anybody that's a white Zionist in, in Israel.
But here's one that's even more clear.
Thousands in Israel, February 13th, 2023,
protest far right government's plan
to weaken the nation's judiciary, okay?
It's not hard to see that this is not even remotely
what he's pretending that it is at very not even to the,
and definitely not to the level
of being an independent enough judiciary
to justify not being investigated by international court.
So this is very clear yet again, Lindsey Graham
and the rest of 'em just gaslighting for Israel
because that clearly seems to be what their job is.
Here's one from 2023 as well.
Israel's far right government wants the power
to override a Supreme Court.
Same points we're making, we're just showing you this from
all these different angles, from
different court media outlets.
This shows you that
what they're doing is specifically undermining the very
thing that he's saying is independent,
which means you're not supposed to investigate them,
even though we can tell that they're trying
and have already done that.
September 13th def in 2023, defending, defending the rule
of law, amnesty, international rights, enforcing, apartheid,
the double life of Israel's judiciary.
So in a totally separate conversation,
they're simply just highlighting that, look,
you can't have an apartheid state
and then act like you're an independent ju.
The point is the, the judiciary is enforcing an apartheid
state of law, which is completely contradictory
to the things they claim they're bound by.
So even before that, we can acknowledge
that there's already a way to prove that this is not fair
and balanced in any case, going back
to Lindsey Graham's statement, there is no equip the idea
that the ICC has no jurisdiction
is flat out false
because Palestine is part of it from 2015 forward, on top
of the fact that they can investigate Israel
because of the crimes they committed there.
Because they're not holding themselves accountable.
They do not have an independent judiciary.
Not to say that it couldn't be,
or to say that these judges are all co
compromising co I don't know.
But what I do know is that what they've, the government
that is committing the crimes has already set things in
motion and in place that allowed them
to circumvent the very thing
that might hold them accountable.
In some ways, that's as simple as it gets now.
In fact, I think I'm going to leave that. Well, lemme see.
I I'm probably gonna come back to this.
I just wanted to give a couple more points here
about this food aid conversation.
Well, you know what? I think I'm just gonna leave it there.
I think that's a good place to end with.
I think just the, and I'm gonna cock about this again,
it's just more lies that are obviously verifiable,
but what evil just like, like keep hiding.
He literally just came back out
with like more food than ever.
They know they're not starving. There's no genocide.
Look at what Koga just said.
Even though we can literally prove
that they're lying based on what's actually
happening, it's so bad.
And in general, there's just a couple of good points here.
This is another Michael Rappaport cliff that just,
he completely misunderstands what the guy's saying.
It's really bad. He makes this whole grasping statement
about how we're supposed to fund Tomas and give them water.
He didn't even say that. I will go over this
because it's funny, but probably in the beginning
of the next show as well as, oops,
the campus protest conversation.
Yeah, we'll leave it there. 'cause a lot of this is stuff
that we can talk about anytime, but guys just recognize
as we're talking about an investigation, it's important to,
you know, be objective about this.
It's very transparent.
You can see very clearly that
what we're talking about is not an honest process in regard
to the way that the Israeli government is dealing with this.
And if we can tell they're committing genocide,
which is obvious more than anything I can see right now,
as Matt Lee said, who, who, what are they supposed to do?
Where are they supposed to go? Just wait.
Apparently Matt Miller wants you to think, no, no,
that's not how this is gonna go.
The fair least public opinion should have enough sway right
now over our governments to force them
to stop supporting the genocide, stand up and do something.
I mean, truly right now is the time we more than ever in,
in, I've been doing this to find the courage
to stand up for something you believe in.
So thank you for tuning in guys.
I think it's important that we keep pushing that message,
the idea that, you know, of course you could lose, right?
I mean, that's my point from the other day about
what I'm dealing with in, in general,
that I can almost guarantee you that all said
and done, that what I'm doing here will
not ultimately be to my benefit.
I think that very clearly I'm gonna deal
with the out the fallout of, you know, like a lot
of us have censorship and impression
and not allowed to use Google products or banking
or, you know, whatever else ultimately happens.
But I'm okay with that because this is more important
for all of us and we all, I think, need to e accept
what kind of, you know, look, if we're dealing
with a dishonest government
that's gonna hold you accountable for things you did not do,
or call you a racist, even though you're not doing that,
doesn't, that isn't that worthy of fighting.
Even if you end up taking the detriment for
what those illegal
and unjust allegations,
I would argue, at least that's what I think.
And I think it's time for people that do believe that
to, to take those action.
I'd never mean violence. I mean,
standing up in an uncomfortable time
to make sure people recognize that you are on the side
of truth and justice.
You know, and these are not some, you know, tropes or,
or naive statements.
I mean, if we don't believe in things like truth
and justice, I mean, what are we doing?
And I think this is one of the most important times
that I've seen where we need to stand up
and make sure people see that even if they disagree
with you, the facts, like
with the COVID-19 conversation are self-evident
and with time will be to everybody,
even if they don't admit it.
So what we're, what our, what I see our job right now is
to do everything we can to get that in front of people
that need to see it in hopes
that just enough momentum starts
to stop, at least for a moment.
What's happening to these people?
It pains me every day to watch what continues.
Like we're somehow failing them by not doing enough.
So help me. I love you all as always. Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.