- Do you think that you witnessed war crimes taking place?
- Probably, probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas,
and then if you go this way, you're bound
to kill people that are not
- Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say?
- There are no uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
- Welcome to the daily wrap up.
A concise show dedicated to bringing you the most
relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours
Monday, May 20th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
A lot to cover some pretty big events
over the last couple of days.
We're gonna discuss an into today
regarding the International Criminal court,
an Iranian plane crash with the president, as well as, um,
a ongoing for a long time now,
but it kind of a resurgence of the
US involvement on the ground with the Democratic Republic
of Congo in an attempt at another coup.
At least that's what the facts seemed to present.
At the very least. We know that there was Americans on the
ground, there were British people on the ground.
One person that overlaps as I believe in Israeli American.
We'll talk about all of this
and how important it really is to the larger picture,
but I find it most interesting that we're seeing this as
somebody looks like every .
Of course, somebody's saying black screen,
it looks all good on my end.
So let me know in the chat what you guys are seeing
as we're seeing the International Criminal Court
bring forward or at least announce the charges.
Yeah, okay. That's interesting.
, I don't have any, any, I mean,
I can see it clearly on my screen guys,
so I have no idea why you wouldn't be able to see my screen.
Are you able to see that? Let me know in the chat.
What a wonderful way to start today.
So I'm gonna keep going. Let me know if you can see.
Yeah, looks like pretty much everybody's saying that.
I don't even know how that's possible on the Streamy yard.
I'm looking at the screen. Everything's lined up perfectly.
So let's see.
, I don't even know how we would continue if there's
no video whatsoever.
Is this just another form of censorship?
Um, let's see, guys, I don't know this,
this always kills me when I got this great thing lined up.
Everything's ready to go. I'm ready to jump into it
and right outta the gate we get these
little, little things like this happen.
Um, I guess I can try to,
oh, okay.
So now it's okay.
Yeah, I mean, okay, so looks like we're okay for,
I'm gonna let it go for another second just
to make sure I'm not jumping the gun and it's not visible,
not you, but the website is showing up.
. That's fantastic.
Well, just so you guys know, there's no issue on the
feed or the connection.
I can see the feed on Streamy yard from my end.
So this must be a Streamy yard problem.
In any case, you guys don't need
to see me, so that's not a problem.
Let's continue. So the point
as we get into this to start is a lot
of things happening at once, and I find it very interesting
that this is happening while this comes out.
Not necessarily to say
or even imply that this is why those were happening.
I just think it's interesting that we're seeing this kind
of breakdown of, of, of what used to be the norm.
And that's not even just about Israel
and the way that the Israeli government,
the Zionist faction, is completely influenced
and in, in many ways controlled things that are pervasive.
Whether we're talking about the per the, the perception
of certain conversations, whether we're talking about
religion and the way it's perceived.
I mean, it's, it's really a, an alarming,
pervasive surreptitious concept.
And this is what many people are beginning
to understand about what Zionism truly is
and things that they've said themselves in the, the way
that the Israeli government has practices and,
and legislation in place to make sure
that even within their society it's actually illegal
to discuss or announce
or highlight the things that we can prove.
And I'm talking about the documentation of what happened,
let's just say, for example, during the nakba,
and these have been admitted by Harts
and by other Jewish people, by other Israelis.
But yet, yet we still get called racist
for highlighting these things or somehow biased
for highlighting things that we can prove as well as we all
continue to highlight the things that we think are
important in the conversation.
We all have the, the perceptions that we believe the, the,
the way that we view things and the way we
think things fit together.
But that doesn't mean we're always right.
What's important to understand is
that the best we can do in any situation is be objective
as we can to try to put forward all sides
of a conversation and to provide your source material.
Nobody is without bias.
And I'm talking about this because of something
that I was discussing online earlier today.
And I think it's interesting that there's,
in this conversation more than ever,
it's come out really clearly
that there are a few people in this, I guess not people,
but more so mindsets in this conversation
where we're talking about people that are unaware
that they are completely blind when it comes
to anything survi circling around these real conversation.
And I only say that because I genuinely believe
that there are people that
believe that they're being honest.
And it's, I think it's a smaller per group,
but that truly have a complete blind spot when it comes
to anything about Israel
and are so on guard that they attack people
for simply trying to be objective about the conversation.
Then there are people that I can clearly see
that are willfully deceiving people for the interest
of Israel or whatever they believe
they're fighting for on that side.
And, and then there's people I believe
that are genuinely trying to call it out.
Now, of course there's a a multifaceted group within that
as well, even to the point that I can prove to you
that there are outwardly absolute racist
that are using this conversation
to push forward their belief
that all Jews in the world are bad,
which is ridiculous and disgusting.
But the frustrating part is
that those people will attack those of us, like
what we're doing here as if we somehow secretly hate all the
Jews, which I just can't even say
without laughing about it right now.
Not to say that there's not somebody out there that do that.
We can point them out in our chat sometimes.
The point is that it's incredible that we can try our best
to have an objective conversation about things
that are swirling around some of the biggest topics in the,
the, you know, developing conversations in the world,
historical foreign policy dynamics,
and just do our best to be objective about it
and highlight provable connection to these things.
And yet those people will still try to shout you down
and still try to act like you're wink
wink saying what we all know.
It's just sort of embarrassing.
And I really believe it's a dying thing right now.
Not that that's not gonna come back in other topics,
but I mean in regard to Israel.
Now I'm saying all of this because
what we're talking about today, going back in history is
where it becomes so frustrating for some people.
Like my Congo for example.
And I just highlighted the idea of the diamond trade,
the blood diamonds and the horrific reality
that is very easy to see that tries directly to Israel
and the diamond industry of what they do with child labor
and the reality of not just that,
but a lot of things that have revolve around the,
the blood diamond market or conversations like Rwanda
or Bosnia or any other previous genocides
that we can literally prove that Israel was involved with
as well as the US in many cases.
And it's only relevant right now
because we're discussing Israel as a central point to a lot
of the things we're discussing today.
Now, why should we be worried
to talk about those things when you can literally point
to the leading newspaper, one of them in Israel, Harts
who have broken these things down over the years,
even highlighted that the reason these are so quiet
and so hard to find is
because their legislation makes it a law
that they're not allowed to even access these documents.
Not as journalists, not as anybody.
So it's incredible that there's so people that don't see
that choose to ignore how controlled
and how dishonest all of this is.
But at the same time, I'm finding a lot of beacons
of light out there that I'd ever expected.
People that I think are,
and I'm not even talking about,
the ones you might think are the people that probably most
of which you might, a lot of the
non-regular viewers might not even know about.
But people out there that are, in my opinion,
taking the same kind of stance, being objective, trying
to be as honest
and as factual as we can with of course our own opinions.
Nobody is without bias.
Anybody out there pretending that they aren't
or are without bias are dishonest people.
The best we can do is try to be objective throughout it all.
Now, now that I've waited quite a while
and I, I did wanna mostly say all of that,
but really just wanted to make
sure we're still good with the picture.
Let me know in the chat everything's up and running.
Before we jump into this,
I don't wanna have another breakdown throughout it all
'cause I think a lot of this is very important today.
So I'm gonna get going, but let me know in the chat
and also let me know if you are able to see me or not.
I just brought up my view as well, not that that matters
for the larger show, but just
curious ultimately what's going on.
So let's get into it. So I wanted to start actually
with an interesting point that's sort of, uh,
completely disconnected from the larger
points we're gonna make today.
And it's actually pretty incredible that it's so prominent
as, which has been up on
the screen the whole time I've been talking.
Now picture good. It feels just my camera.
Hmm, that's very interesting to me.
I, I'm as just, not that I need to say this,
but I'm thinking if I were just to jump out of stream yard
and come back in, it would probably be okay,
but I don't wanna have to reset everything.
So I'm just gonna leave it that way for today.
But, uh, interesting, interesting indeed.
But so, oh, now you can see me . Interesting.
Anyway, let's get past from all of that,
for those in the podcast who are listening
to this the day after I started.
You're all like, get to it Ryan.
So this is an important conversation about the Red Cross,
about blood contamination
that I think is actually pretty incredible.
This is from the UK and oh,
and so, you know, the, the headline is sort of a, a running,
i I absolutely hate these live update feed channel.
Like it's, I I wish they would just post articles about
what's happening, but it's, this is about, at least
as the title says now, sumac offers wholehearted apology
to victims of infected blood scandal.
Isn't that interesting? Especially for those of us
that have been following the Red Cross contamination
with the idea of the spike protein conversation.
Now we could talk about mRNA mRNA as well,
but I think the real point is about
what we can very clearly prove, which is
that the spike protein is in fact in the blood well past
the, well, first of all, they lied about it ever being
that case one spike protein
and it stayed in your shoulder muscle
and all these lies they split out.
No, we know that it continues to go,
that it goes into your bloodstream
that it then circulates in, in some cases for months.
And this has been scientifically proven peer-reviewed sites,
and I'll show you them in a second.
And then we know that people have taken,
given blood within a timeframe, even as the Red Cross says,
you have to have this much time after you've got the shot,
there's a whole window there where we can prove that they do
and can have spike proteins in their blood.
Then we can prove the spike protein has been proven
by the Slk Institute.
Circular, circular re uh, research, I believe is the,
the name of the, um, medical journal.
Uh, even the Dr. Luisi Warren himself argued
that it is there and it can even shed, the point is
that these things can be caught, it can cause symptoms
and it can spread again, which
that's a d interesting conversation
that I get into every time we're not gonna talk about.
Now, you know, what is that?
It's not covid or whatever we wanna call it,
if it's just a protein of it
and that can then make symptoms and so on.
It sounds like a weapon to me.
But either way, the point is, we know
for a fact based on the same science they're telling us
to trust that this is a problem.
But yet it has gotten zero attention,
it's gotten zero follow up, zero coverage by any
of the so-called journalists
out there in the corporate media.
So what's interesting now is this is about something
that connects to the US the same general problem,
but from a different angle.
Now I'm just gonna go to these clips
'cause it's updated a bunch since we've, um,
been getting ready.
It was just, and here just so to look at the headline,
the the most recent one, this is from one
of the victim's son, victim's sons.
It was just blatant coverups. Yeah, we know that, right?
It says we've been bringing you reaction
to today's report from some of the affected families.
Now this is an overlap with HIV in fact,
and it says that he was infected early in 1980s when he con
contracted HIV during a blood transfusion.
Now think about how crazy it is that we can know that.
And let's also, this should be its own show in, in
and of itself, by the way, and we've talked about most
of this already, the overlap of HIV and aids.
Even Dr. Fauci, Dr.
Ovitz made this real clear in the beginning,
but most people weren't ready to hear all this
and that this was already a problem.
It's the same damn conversation, even the conversation
of whether AIDS and HIV are even, you know,
one causing the other kind of conversation
or whether really it's the side effects
of things being called something else.
And we're really talking about VAs
or your body having a reaction, not so much
as catching something and getting sick.
In any case, this was a problem that got covered up
until now, essentially.
So how are we gonna pretend that the idea of spike protein,
the blood and red cross is not a huge
issue that they're also covering up?
We should at least ask the question, which none
of the so-called
journalists in the government media will do.
This is just one of the points in there. Read it all.
It's really interesting. It's ongoing.
How could the scale of bloods of suffering been avoided?
It simply says the common practice used by the government,
certainly during the 1980s
and nineties was that patients had received, quote,
the best treatment available, which they say all, I mean,
this is just politics this point,
but it says, but that was not true.
Shocking as the public inquiry has clearly laid out,
in fact, the scale of suffering could
and should be largely avoided.
It said, but how?
Firstly, the blood products imported from the United States
to treat people with bleeding disorders should simply never
have been licensed for use.
So you can EAs you can easily at least connect the reality
of the United States and their incompetence
or their willful disregard
or their criminal activity in
regard to the blood conversation.
But I don't think this is just the United States,
quite frankly, I think it's always bigger than that.
But either way, we have to realize
that this could be simple as simple as that.
And they're just been hiding it this entire time.
Blood, uh, excuse me, drug companies were allowed
to pay people for their blood
and did so by offering drug addicts and prisoners money.
Gee, I wonder how, why, I mean mean, I don't even need
to say how ridiculous that is in the concept of drug addicts
and asking them for their blood,
like that's going to be safe somehow.
I think this was more of an experiment if you want my honest
opinion, but here's what it says
after which of course I always give my honest opinion.
Here is another one of these points.
It just gives you kind of the overall breakdown.
And this is from one of the speeches given from Sir Brian
Langstaff speaking about the findings
of this five year public inquiry.
Which do we really wanna pretend that this took five years
to figure out, even though we knew this was happening
a decade, decades ago.
You know, this is dragging this out
for five years kind of a thing.
I mean, the evidence is
self-evident as far as I'm concerned.
Logstaff said the contaminated blood
disaster was no accident.
That's a big deal. That means that somebody did this
or covered it up or allowed it
and then, you know, whatever differing possibilities,
it was not by accident.
So somebody should be going to prison for this.
I'll be willing to bet you that that doesn't happen.
And people who put their trust in doctors
and governments were betrayed over many decades.
It says most infections contracted via contaminated blood
would have been prevented if the patient's safety
had been paramount.
I mean, my god, we're talking.
So the the idea
that the patient safety is not paramount in a patient,
just please overlap this for those
that might be still skeptical of the vaccines
or, you know, the idea that the COVID-19 conversation was
all conspiracy theories.
The idea that when we can clearly see
that they do not put your safety at the top
of the list in the context of what things they're doing
for you, you just need to recognize that
that's pretty much how they think in general.
And it says children witness the decline of, of
and death of one.
Sometimes both parents
and their lives were irrevocably altered.
I mean, I can go on for a get you get the clear point here.
Now, this is just one of these articles about it,
UK inquiry accuses authorities
of coverup in infected blood scandal.
Now what's interesting of course is it's an inquiry from the
uk but my opinion, if you want it is that ultimately I think
that the governments are absolutely involved
with allowing this, covering it up,
turning a blind eye, whatever you wanna call it.
So this feels a little bit like a coverup in and of itself.
We will see what happens in regard to accountability,
but let's end with this segment
to make sure we do not forget.
This is the reason I'm even talking about this.
Then we've talked about that, that story again,
they're breaking the news about the thing we just
investigated that we've all been talking
about for 20 years, right?
That's how this ridiculous concept goes is that we,
we pretend it's the illusion
of accountability in most cases,
only when it's at the absolute breaking point,
usually a little bit beyond that, right?
That they're trying to patch up something
that's completely irrevocably broken with a half story
to make you think that everything's back.
And my point is they've lost
control, that's why it's broken.
But Red Cross September 13th 22 in response
to Long Claw, who actually I can't,
I'm really surprised they got, they responded to this
as they posted something about blood, you know,
giving blood 2022 and they said,
is covid vaccinated blood labeled as such?
It's a very valid question.
What if you need blood and you don't want vaccinated blood?
I mean, I don't even know why that's a, like,
considered a conspiracy theory, uh, whether
or not you think the spike protein, whatever else.
I mean, we're talking about even historical
concepts, not even mRNA.
We're talking about things that in hi, you know,
historically there are something there.
It's not just benign.
And so the idea that you, you at the very least,
whether it's benign or not, isn't it your choice?
Shouldn't I demand
or you demand that we want to know this information clearly?
Most do, they don't care. Here's what they said.
I flat out lie, we don't label blood products
as containing vaccinated or unvaccinated blood.
Why? Because the covid vaccine does not
enter the bloodstream.
They are still standing by that.
There is literally nobody saying
that anymore, as far as I can tell.
That has been roundly shown to be false,
whether it was an accident or designed that way.
It is not the truth. And they still stand by that.
I retweeted this just again today. I keep doing that.
They keep seeing it and they keep ignoring it.
And the point is, the study is one
of many from 2023 peer reviewed
SARS-CoV-2 Spike mRNA vaccine
sequences circulate in the blood up to 28 days after.
And in this case it was because that's how long they looked.
And other studies we found go even longer.
And I've posted some of them down below.
Um, I believe, oh, I think it's under this.
Oh, I should have kept that other one open.
Oh, anyway, there was more that I had underneath this.
Maybe this one. Let's see. Yeah, there we go.
This one again, another study.
This one is from 2023 September duration
of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine persistence.
And this one says the results, they, they routinely persist,
routinely persist up to 30 days
and can be detected in the heart.
It's all fake news though, right?
I mean, there's more down here. We cover this many times.
So the real, the real, the reality of all of this,
especially as we're seeing that they're, uh, you know,
thir 40 years later going, whoopsie, we made a mistake
and we're only now talking about it too late.
Everybody's gotten the problem that we have to recognize
that this is a real problem
and the blood supply is contaminated.
That's not a question. It's no way around it at this point.
And, and people like Ovitz would tell you
that's been going on for 20, 30 years.
I just think that's shockingly important.
And it's one of the stories, like any number of things
that we can prove like East Palestine
and the complete cover up therein,
Alan Shaw knowingly hiding the fact
that it was treated vinyl chloride
and not regular vinyl chloride,
which the person told him their expert,
that it wouldn't explode, lied
to the volunteer fire chief and they blame it.
I mean, it's all public, it was done in court,
but nobody cares because we don't live in
an honest system right now.
And the people that are supposed to be the journalist turn a
blind eye like just like this.
Now I'll include the ones where we talked about this.
This is from 2023, just Red Cross caught.
And then there's another one we did a little bit later,
I believe this, oh no, this was the earlier one from 2022
Vaxxed Red Cross Blood donations.
And in this one I have a phone call with them
where they admit on the record why they don't let it,
why they were differentiating.
And I think you remember why,
and I I might even have that clip still.
Yeah, it's right here. This was on corporate media and your
- COVID-19 vaccine, you're gonna wanna listen to this.
The Red Cross says, anyone
who has received their COVID-19 vaccine cannot donate
convalescent plasma
to help other COVID-19 patients in hospitals.
That plasma is made up of antibodies from people
who have recovered from the virus,
but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies making the
convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other
COVID-19 patients,
- Whoopsie.
And we also have the guy from Pfizer who's on the record
saying that it reduces your antibodies by two or three fold.
I think he said all on the record.
I just, it's amazing to me
that we pretend like this
isn't happening like everything else.
So let's talk about another example
where I guarantee this will get drifted along people,
you know, because of the two party illusion screamers,
the people on the, the, the top of that paradigm that choose
to only look at things through a certain partisan lens
and keep these stories buried.
So we don't really ever see any traction. That's the game.
That is what the two party illusion is there for.
And most of the people at the top
of this don't even really recognize that.
I would argue nonetheless, they're playing their roles
that these things don't really change.
We've already seen these examples.
We're talking now for the podcast about the
Democratic Republic of Congo.
Not it's important that there, that we recognize
that it's a democratic Republic of Congo.
That there is yet another example of a coup.
Now this is coming from people in,
in the government in Congo as well as common sense here,
I think is very clear based on historical.
I'll just show you some of these right outta the gate
where we've already talked about this,
where the US was quietly deploying troops in con in Congo,
where we know that there is already an attempt
at a, at a a coup.
We already even in the past have caught them
where they were, uh, arrested, caught, they were publicized,
and then the US convinced them to send them back home.
And then nothing happened about it more than once.
This has happened. And it's very clear why,
at least in the one example, it's for things like cobalt,
which is shockingly important
to the US government at this point, thinking all the,
you know, the direct, the future that they want that most
of us don't in regard to
electric vehicles and everything else.
But here's an article, uh,
from Barons just simply highlighting Americans, a Brit
among those in the Congo, in Democratic Republic
of Congo in a coup bid.
And you, this is, there's something, um,
actually I might've, let's see.
Yeah, I did have some screenshots.
Hold on one second, then I thought it would
stick around, but it didn't, I guess.
Nope, it's not that one.
I could just read through it, but I think there
was not that one.
Oh, well, in any case,
the point here is this simply highlighting the idea
that there were Britains, there were Brits,
there were Americans, and I believe there's some argument,
there was some a Canadian overlap too.
But this is kind of there. A lot of this is up in the air
and I think that there is both with this
and the helicopter crash, we're gonna get to the main points
to recognize here is that this is kind of an ongoing, both
of them, there are stories that are ongoing
and that there are two things always
happening when that's going on.
People in positions of power
or, you know, tangential to this, that wanna manipulate it
for whatever reason, that will flood the conversation
with nonsense to drive it in
their direction for their benefit.
The people that are involved
and don't want you to see what's going on, they try
to downplay and sidestep
and, you know, muddy the waters about the conversation.
That's always going on, guys. It's always happening.
And I just think we need to always recognize that.
So there's gonna be information that flies
around when you have ongoing stories.
That's why we have to be as objective as possible and prove
and source and ultimately be okay saying
we don't know when that's the case.
Now it says a number of Americans
and a British man were part of a group re responsible
for a coup attempt in the Democratic Republic
of Congo in the capitol in early sun in early Sunday.
So yesterday, according to a spokesman, uh, general,
the coup bid was led by Christian Malanga, who is,
this is the interesting part to me.
This is a person who was in the government,
but I've talked about him before.
If you remember, and this is the interesting
overlap to previous example.
This is a guy who seems to be cultivated
by the US government who literally went
to the us started a political party that was then like this,
this is the, in the part that I think is most relevant.
Now, it's certainly possible this guy could have done it on
his own accord, done it because he wanted to take power.
I mean, there's plenty of examples,
but we need to realize how routine this is
for the US government or the Israeli government
or people that have done this in the past
for their own interests.
Especially when it comes to things like rare earth minerals.
The attack took place outside the residence
of the economy minister in the, uh,
Gombe area in the north of the Capitol.
Yeah. And it does say the group was made up
of several nationalities
and it says adding that around 40
of the attackers have been arrested in four,
including Malinga were killed.
And his son was involved as well.
It says we also have a naturalized British su uh, subject,
the number a two of the group.
Interesting. So if we're talking about the US government
being the lead on this,
or even potentially Israel, we'll get into why it's,
it's at least seems interesting
that the British su sub subject,
they argue is the number two
of the group pretty classic at these days
for the vassal states of the empire, the, the groups like,
and you know, I'm sure Britain would like
that being the description, but the point is
that you can clearly see how, how they completely bow
to the interest of US government.
It's just places like New Zealand
and Australia are the same at this point.
That's not meant to insult any that's out there.
Brits out there, that's not the right use of,
is it Britain's or Brits?
I've heard both, but any case people from Brit Britain,
and I'm gonna leave it there.
In general, I think the point was here ultimately
that we know that they were Americans
and Brits that were involved.
The question really is, is that then from a
official standpoint where they sent thereby their
governments, was this some kind of other overlap
or were these in regard
to at least the one we can prove an Israeli American?
Was that coming from another side?
Were these people involved for a different reason?
These are questions we should be
asking now from the New York Times.
The Congolese army says it foiled a
coup involving Americans.
Now it says, in addition to the footage
of a bloodied white man on the ground, actually here,
I'll just play this one for you first.
So you can see this. This is for African newsfeed,
democratic Republic of Congo,
armed forces repelled an attempted coup deta involving
Congolese and foreign fighters on Sunday morning.
And you interestingly show these two.
Now at first this confused me
because neither of these people are this guy,
but as both the New York Times
and others highlight it, they're, they're showing these two,
I believe this one is the son of the, of,
of the politician in Congo.
And then they have this passport,
which they're alleging is an Israeli American.
And then there's also another American.
Apparently those two are not actually shown, at least
as far as I can see so far.
I'm sure somebody has footage out there somewhere,
but this is clearly an American passport.
Now, Benjamin Rubin is the name on there.
Well, technically it's Zalman Poland,
Benjamin Rubin, which is interesting.
And apparently Zalman Poman is a very, very, very common
Ashkenazi Jew Israeli name,
which doesn't prove that he's Israeli.
But the point is, that's what the coverage has been so far.
Here's what it says, addition to the footage
of the bloodied white man you just showed you on the ground
sitting beside someone identified as Mr.
Milo's son, an American images also circulated showing the
passport of another American, Benjamin Rubins Alman Poland.
Now I've seen people reverse that, in fact,
where they show the other two first,
but either way said to be involved in the episode.
News reports previously identified him
as a cannabis entrepreneur.
This is interesting, involved in gold mining, okay with Mr.
Malanga. Now we already talked about the gold mining aspect.
Robert's written about this entire in depth
and the idea that this was a central part
of the US involvement to manipulating the country,
handing these mines to the people that they,
you know, essentially like a bribe.
Think of it that way. But I think the cannabis
overlap is interesting as well.
And we'll come back to that. Dino Ani,
a former United Nations investigator on Congo,
said the Congolese authorities told him in 2018
that they suspected Mr.
Malonga of a plot to kill the previous president,
Joseph Ka uh, Kaila.
So this is something that's already been happening
and that the UN investigator was openly saying this in 2018,
that he was suspected of killing, trying
to kill the previous president
and yet nothing happened, which is interesting, I think
that at least would add more
possibility to what we were just saying.
You know, that the logic of it being, you know,
lemme put it this way, if we're talking about the US
potentially being involved, it wouldn't be hard
to stop this kind of investigation.
Seeing is how they have such a strong influence over the un.
And it seems this guy is their guy,
but it says a website in Mr.
Olga's name said that his family settled in Salt Lake City
in the 1990s as a part of a refugee settlement program.
That's interesting, of course, that will add a lot of fuel
to the conversation about
how we talk about weaponized migration.
Now, not from the two party illusion perspective,
that these people are all somehow innocent.
You know, all guilty for just simply being migrants
that are being manipulated
or the fact that we can talk about the ignorant,
the ignoring of elements that come from the Israeli side
or the, oh, they only look at the ones
that highlight a bad problem that,
and I'm talking about the two party illusion side of this.
There is still a real aspect to weaponized migration.
And this would be a perfect example of that.
He says it, he participated in the US Army Junior Reserve
Officers Training Corps, .
I mean, this is crazy. See, the guy literally trained
with the US military went to the United States
as a refugee settlement program.
And there's more than that by
the way, and I'll get to it in a second.
It says a year later, he returned to the United States
where he formed the United Congolese Party
in the United States, a grassroots platform
that unifies the Congolese diaspora around the world,
opposing the current dictatorship, now realizing
that the one he is referring to,
or I mean at the time, I mean, let's put it this way
to make, get into the different ups and downs.
There's been many attempts by the US government,
some successful in the past to control this area.
So as far as I'm concerned,
when we're talking about a US government entity
that's being, you know, building a political party in this
country, that's, this is what they're known for, that's
what the National Endowment for Democracy
and all these different groups and USA, that's
what these are mostly covers for.
Not that everybody involved is aware of that
ultimately carrying out the same thing the CIA did in
clandestine fashion before we were aware of that.
That's a direct statement from people involved
with these groups that they do what they used
to do in a clandestine fashion today,
which is regime change.
And the fact that they're opposing the current dictatorship.
I mean, it's the same way they would
frame anything they're disagreeing with.
But you know, as always, consider other angles.
Consider whether
or not this person could have acted of their own accord.
But I think, again, when we have the evidence in front
of us, it's hard not to see the same old trappings
of regime change that we've seen in the past.
It also adds Congo as a focus of American policy in Africa
for its deep reserves of cobalt,
a key mineral in the production of electric vehicles.
China owns or controls most
of Congress's cobalt mining producing sites.
Now that is a huge aspect of this,
and this is a source of concern to the Biden administration.
Well, the only reason that's a source of concern is not
because China, the only reason this is a problem is
because they don't want China to have that benefit.
What you could argue that that's a about democracy.
I mean, that feels pretty naive to make that case,
especially when you're seeing the US government, the one
that's marching around the world and occupying, destroying
and destabilizing countries into our guise of democracy.
I'm not saying China's any better,
China scares the hell out it when it comes
to their author authoritarian technocratic fe direction.
But the point is, if you compare what's going on
around the world, you do not have China marching
around the world and destroying countries.
You have them making deals. Usually, I could argue in any
of these governments using their strong arm tactics
to get a better deal for themselves, the expense
of the country, but at least the
country getting something for it.
Like this is my point. If you have a country
that is being occupied
by the US has been destabilized calling them terrorists,
doing all the things, and they're just reap,
reaping all the benefits and outsourcing everything,
and China comes along and says, here, we'll make you a deal.
You get some
or they get some benefit
to the things the US is just raping their country from.
And the point is that they would love that.
And I'm not even saying it's all I, I can seen plenty
of deals they've made with groups in Africa
that are not bad deals.
The point is that it's very different at the very least.
So with China controlling one
of the most important rare earth minerals,
the US government just can't have that.
Doesn't matter who they kill, destroy,
or destabilize to make sure they get what they want.
Just ask the people involved with the
nor stream pipeline, how that works out.
But it says, but while most
of the region's recent coups have been led
by senior military officers from these countries,
the purported one in, uh, Ken Sasha on Sunday appeared
to have been led by an obscure opposition, political based,
uh, opposition, uh, politician, excuse me,
based in the United States and appeared
to have little prospect of succeeding.
Interesting. I mean, this is what they're framing it
as now, right?
And it's of course the New York Times, in my opinion, kind
of playing its downplaying role in this.
Wouldn't we at the very least be,
I mean, you already made my point.
I mean the idea it's an obscure opposition political ba
based in the United States.
I mean, what that's like saying you're dealing
with a political party in the United States who's,
who's running for a position of power that's based in Israel
or based in Britain.
Like, we'd be like, what?
That doesn't really make much sense.
And it, it's as you're supposed to always read this as well,
they're always out there for democracy and freedom.
So it's ab insulting for you to,
does anybody actually believe that?
I mean, you can. It's self-evident.
Look at their, as I've made, I've made the joke many times,
which is not really even a joke.
The US government is literally batting zero.
If you pretend they're going for democracy.
I mean, every single time they go into, we're fighting
for freedom and we wanna liberate the country.
How did Iraq turn out? How did Afghanistan turn out?
How did Libya turn out? How did Syria turn out?
How did any of these countries turn out
where they cra they just tripped their shoe laces
and boop, destroyed the country, we'll do better next time.
No, they were designed to do that.
That's what they were trying to do.
That's what we need to recognize.
And that's why these countries are very aware of this
and many people at least assume
or have in indicated they believe Russia was the one
that might have tipped them off,
which would make sense to me.
But here's again, uh, we already showed you this.
The, the image of the passport itself
now here is, um, actually no, this,
I thought this was somebody, a representative.
This is somebody else's posting information,
which I thought was interesting, just showing the full image
of this person, Benjamin Rubin,
and then Marcel Mondy Mag, uh, Malanga, who's the son
of the politician were captured.
And it just shows you the larger image of this,
which is not necessarily that matter
because people are trying
to overthrow a country in violence.
So
I'll make a point too that it's interesting to me that
I guarantee there are some people out there
who would make the argument that we're supposed
to care more, that this person is being arrested
and held, caught, you know,
because he's an American, which I don't understand that
for most people, whether I'm American
or not, did he break the law?
Was he trying to commit a crime?
Was what he, and again, I'm not saying we can prove.
Well, if you think that this is not enough to make
that case, then wait
for all the evidence if you think
it's gonna prove out in a different way.
And we could talk about that at the case.
I think the evidence is very clear.
This was clearly an attempt
and clearly involved an American Israeli in Britain.
My point though is that it's interesting that like
for instance, when a spy gets caught in Iran
and they arrest him and they screech about how you're,
you know, taking him, how you're kidnapping an American,
it's like, well, the guy was breaking the law.
It's interesting that we pretend like it doesn't matter
simply because of American, which by the way is what a lot
of foreign entities believe is, you know,
which creates the resentment even towards average Americans,
which I think is largely the point, sort
of a Zionism using the Judaism
conversation to create resentment.
So it ends up creating what they claim exists.
So my point is that this person, just
because he's an American, if in if it's proven
to be involved in this coup,
should not be treated any
differently because he's an American.
Especially when we look at the history of US coups
and what they've, what follows.
I mean, just look at Libya horrible
cloud.
Ga Burke points out those who pretend to want change,
but take shortcuts like a coup, for example, instead
of the hard work of awakening,
the people aren't really trying to be radical
and fundamental change.
They just want the positions power and control.
The failed coup in Congo is one of the shortcuts taken
by many, including some
who try it via political manipulations,
not only in Congo, but elsewhere.
Oh, and who is this American guy that was part of the coup.
It says such change in quotes if it happened at all,
as we've seen many times will be very temporary
and self-serving for those
who want power instead of fundamental change.
Very well put in the end point there
because the reality is they don't want change,
they want maintain, they wanna maintain destabilization,
maintain insecurity so they can reap the benefits
so they can force the country
and whoever current warlord, whoever, you know,
whatever person's willing to bend all the rules,
break 'em all, have no real moral accountability,
who will do whatever they say as long as you pay them.
That's the kind of people they work with.
That's the whole point about this ongoing discussion in the
Middle East where it's provable at this point that Israel
and has for a long time, Israel
and the United States have funded the most radical elements
of the very thing they claim they're fighting.
Why? Because they're willing to do anything where the people
that are more moderate are don't want to just bend over
and let Israel and the US take whatever they want
for the benefit of them at the expense of their people.
Even if you still argue
that they may be more radical than you.
Like, the point is that they weren't radical enough
because they were going, no, we don't want that from you.
And so they go to the most radical, the ones
that have nothing that are sacred and they pay them
and influence them and then blame the entire concept
for being that way.
It's just, it's just, it's inherently disgusting.
Like these people don't care about anything
and that doesn't mean everybody,
but clearly we can see a central role here
and down here, it's just simply showing you the same clip.
And this is Congo is bleeding.
Simply saying change in Congo will not come through arms,
but through the wakening of national consciousness,
what happened today is not
what the Congolese government is telling us happened.
So everyone seems to be questioning the reality.
He's even questioning what they're claiming happened.
So bear that in mind.
Now, this one, this, this is
where it gets very interesting to me.
This is a kind of a low,
a smaller TV channel representative simply saying,
the gang leader of the attackers malanga,
who you're gonna see in this video, has been preparing
for a very long time to overthrow the power of the capitol.
Now the point is that this is not news.
I mean, even the New York Times made that clear.
Even the United Nations had said he was trying to do that,
but it says he was shot dead.
Oh no, it says he was discreetly supported
by some western countries
and Israel, he was shot dead
by the val soldiers of the Republican Guard.
Now, here is a video of him speaking with the IDF in Congo.
Look at that where he is shaking hands with the people
from the IDF this, this guy right here is the one
that got shot who was involved with the coup.
The the one that's very, the only one that seems,
that's un unquestionably provable
that he was involved, he got shot.
And you know, you could argue that the entire narrative is
being manufactured, but I think there's more than enough
evidence to see that that's not the case.
But here it is, talking with the IDF in Congo.
So what are we talking about? It's obvious
that there's some connection there, right?
That has to matter absolutely.
Here as Pelham points out, now, this is something
that I see, this is in regard to the fact
that this person is a mercenary.
That's not something that I can verify,
but American Israeli, Benjamin Rubin has been captured
after a failed coup in Congo.
Ruben is play is paid.
Mer uh, is a he, she claims a paid mercenary by former head
of Israel's Moad spy agency, Yassi Cohen
and Jewish billionaire Dan Gertler.
This is the second failed coup by Yassi Cohen,
who is banned from entering the
Democratic Republic of Congo.
Remember, there's a huge overlap to this
with the blood diamond industry, which is a huge amount
of revenue for Israel general.
And I think that ca if that's called into question,
especially right now,
I would think you would see some pretty desperate action.
Maybe that's what we're looking at.
Now, this person comments saying
this, and this is a great point.
You know, we're talking about an Israeli American,
and the point being, well this is an example
of the dual citizenship problem.
Do you see how an Israeli can implicate America while
working for Mossad as a double agent?
This is an example of the identities of the deep state.
Name another group that has this flex in America, right?
I mean the, the point is you could argue that just like a,
a false flag kind of concept.
And more than that, just the idea that it's somebody
who is acting under, you know, again,
mul mostly reported right now is an American.
Why is it that we're leaving off the other part of that.
Now, Pelham also reports in regard to Congo.
The Biden administration is set
to allow a Jewish billionaire, Dan Gertler,
to cash out his mining positions in the Democratic Republic
of Congo, which has enraged human rights activists.
Gettler is responsible for thousands of child slaves.
That's what she's showing right here, which is undeniably
provable in his illegal cobalt
and diamond mines in the, in the DRC.
You know, if as always, this is not,
we don't just take tweets for at face value.
This is the reality. Here's May 17th from Times
of Israel us quote, exploring limited sanctions relief.
Why for Israeli mining magnet magnate Dan Gertler.
So this is what we're talking, this is literally they're
talking about removing sanctions to allow this person
to cash out of an ongoing, like this is incredible to me.
And I think there's obvious,
there's obviously something in flux
around this entire endeavor,
and I guarantee that makes the Israeli government very
uncomfortable at the very, this this is just a, is Israeli
billionaire who's being allowed like nobody else would
or potentially being, considering allowing him to cash out
and who's gonna buy in?
Who are they? Buy, who, who is he buy
who is giving him the money?
That's interesting. Now, here is a local report about this,
the strange coup, and it says in the early hours of Sept
of Sunday, the 19th of May, an attempted coup took place,
which was thwarted by the army.
According to the Congolese authorities, a group
of at least 20 armed men in combat gear attacked the palace
of the nation where the President
Felix, um, oh, that's right.
I wanted to make sure I said this correctly.
President Chichetti Felix Chichetti ti
where the president Chief CTI's offices are located
after attacking the nearby home of the economy, mis minister
in the shootout with the regular military,
at least three attackers lost their lives as well
as two police officers guarding the economy minister's
house, including their leader, Christian Malanga, uh,
Malanga Masu Masu ma, while the remaining members
of the command were arrested, among them were Lanka's son,
22-year-old Marcel, as well as several US citizens, several,
at least one British citizen, Christian Malanga, uh, MASU
Masu Mari was the leader of the small political party.
He founded the US registered United Congolese Party.
I find that pretty, I it's it's
conspicuous, right?
I mean it's very on the surface here.
It's a us founded political party for the Congo led
by somebody who Mo was lived
and grew up for the, at least lived there
for a while in apparently Salt Lake City
as the New York Times reports.
I mean that seems a little, little bit too on the nose.
Malanga came to the United States as a refugee,
as we just said in 1998
and settled in the state of Utah where he lived until 2006.
That year he returned to the Democratic Republic of Congo,
where he served in the military
and achieved the rank of captain.
In 2011,
he ran in the opposition in the parliamentary elections,
but was arrested before the election,
which they cried foul, right?
In 2012, he returned to the United States.
So get this, so he lives in the United States for 1998,
2006, then decides to move back to Congo
and decides to immerse himself in the
political political sphere.
That's interesting. Then he gets arrested.
I, and the point was the time they were accusing him of
what do you think working for a foreign government?
He, he leaves, goes back to the United States,
founds this party, and then goes back and gets more
and think that, I mean, how do we ignore that clear overlap.
Now it says in 2013, milonga was appointed ambassador
to the International Religious Freedom Roundtable, which was
a Washington based coalition
of 52 non-governmental organizations.
Now, it doesn't immediately mean or prove
because he's so immersed with the US government
that this is exactly what it looks like,
but come on guys, we have to be honest with everything else.
Of course, I believe that's exactly what it is.
But just these points alone, what do it, it,
it only a willfully ignorant person is not aware
of ex the the usual situation
that the US government is involved in when they have their
Washington based coalition, it's usually rife impactful
with the people that we know
are not what they're pretending to be.
I mean, they, their chief ally are Saudi Arabia
and Israel for crying out loud.
It's very clear that they are not morally
sound at this point, guys.
And it says in 2016, he was part
of a British backed delegation, so British,
and which explains the coup we're talking about,
of African leaders that traveled to, to, to be, uh,
Tbilisi in Georgia, the country the Americans arrested,
including Benjamin Rubin, Zalman, Poland of,
of Maryland, and Cole Patrick.
Both were business partners of the Malonga in of Malonga
and the medical cannabis
and e-cigarette business, e-cigarettes, vaping,
of course it is in Mozambique
where they founded the company CCB Mining Solutions.
Reuben Zelman Poland was arrested in the US in 2014
for drug trafficking.
So this guy was already, I mean there's a couple ways you
can look at this and this is the guy that,
that's supposedly the Israeli American.
The point is that we're talking about somebody
who was already arrested in,
in the United States in thousand 14 for drug trafficking,
which I understand that is some kind
of ongoing up in the air re situation.
What does that tell you? That to me suggests very clearly
that if, let's just say everything else is not the reality
that somebody who is compromised,
who could have been used in this way, you know, the way
that they ask someone, Hey, you do this
for us and you won't go to jail.
Certainly possible. Just one of the many things
that we're considering here is another,
uh, it's from Vanguard.
Dr. Democratic Republic of Congo's army accuses America
of involvement in the failed coup.
The passport of one of the Americans allegedly involved in
the failed coup of Salman Poland, Benjamin Rubin was,
has been posted on social media.
As you guys have seen Americans alleged involvement in this
coup comes after a series of armed attacks organized
by members of the US private military company,
Bancroft in the Central African Republic targeting mines
belonging to none other than Chinese companies.
Well look at that most recently,
Gaga's Gold Mine in May 12th, 2024.
See right there, we've come full circle already.
We already see the reality here
that this in this sense was aimed at competition
of China owning the minds of the US
or at least the US infrastructure coveted.
And so what we're talking about is a coup that came
after continuing armed attacks by members
of a United States private military company, Bancroft.
Now this is the whole point about the plausible deniability
or the idea that you can have.
We're, we're no longer in Afghanistan a complete lie
because we know whether I, quite frankly,
I think it's quite easy to prove
that they even still have US personnel,
but we're talking about military contractors
or proxy groups.
That's what they are. That's just what they constantly do.
So when we realize a US private military company is acting
in their interests against groups, that they're clearly,
again, I mean it's, I think that is self-explanatory.
It says the US Embassy
and the DRC has denied any US involvement, of course,
in the coup attempt and does the, as does the justifications
and statements of the US Embassy in the
Central African Republic regarding the illegal activities
of its citizens, agents
and pmcs in the Central African Republic.
It says for many political activists in Africa,
the United States is intensifying the struggle
for political influence.
That's the, that's the China dynamic in the region
and has now moved on to more violent actions
or continues them though non-governmental organizations
or through NGOs like
usaid, national Endowment for Democracy.
Totally not non-governmental, but that's the game.
And its citizens agents and private military companies.
The US is conducting a series of violent actions in order
to impose its policy in the Central African region.
I mean, is this even hard? This is like government,
US Government 1 0 1 guys.
It's very easy to wrap your mind around.
It says political activists in Africa
and that the chain activists in Africa add that the chain
of US violence will continue,
and leaders of Central African countries must be extremely
vigilant regarding the activities of US citizens
and organizations in their countries.
It's funny how the US government going back a long time
World War II and before really pressed the idea
of the fifth column, you know,
can't allow other dangerous people from other countries
or Americans that are influenced by them
to sabotage what we're doing.
Which of course is real. That's everywhere in the world.
You're gonna have people both local
and not local, who are either influenced
or part of something that will try
to act for the interest of other.
But guess who does that more than anybody in the world?
The US government. It's all on the surface.
They have entire programs. What do you think?
Things like Voice of America, these different groups
are, that's what those are.
So just recognize that the whole,
every accusation is a, is an admission kind of a thing.
Here is an insulting, uh, example,
I'm gonna play a clip from this later in the show.
If we get to it, Joe Biden on the 19th,
literally on the day that this is breaking down, or,
or really not the exact day,
but the ongoing reality of it, right up until the 19th,
he gives a speech with the con,
with the flag for Congo behind him.
I mean, it, it, it's just almost like an insult.
I mean, this person is going, thank you
for drawing attention to it,
but you know, realistically, as you, I,
as I think it's self-evident,
the US government is involved in some way, it that is, uh,
it's almost too much on the nose for me
or just insulting that you pretend that you're fighting
for a group that you're actively
and historically destabilizing for your own benefit.
But I'll include the shows we did
recently or the coverage of this.
This is the one a show I just recently did,
and this gets into all a lot
of the stuff I touched on here, that going much deeper.
Hey, this was also about Haiti. Same conversation, really.
Haiti fights to end Western exploitation.
Congo continues to be manipulated
and Israel defeated itself.
That's the ongoing thing.
I I, I made that claim the first week
of this that they'd already lost.
Now, I don't even just mean militarily,
but I think that's all becoming clear to everybody.
But the reality here is
that you can see the fingerprints, guys.
And in this one, I go deep in the conversation
of the minds and how you can prove this.
There's entire articles written by Israeli media
documentation, admissions showing that this is the reality,
and that the US government turns blind eye
as they accuse anybody else, even
for a fraction of the same.
This was one I wrote personally in 2016,
the Congo Uprising in the CI sto,
and this overlapped with a lot
of the stuff we're talking about today.
And this one was 2019 from Jason Dtz from a, um,
uh, anti-war dot com.
Us quietly deploys troops to gabo amid fears
of unrest in Congo, which is, you know, on the,
just the main central point of this.
Remember this, this is from zero hedge, I believe 2018
from this ork looking character who is a US politician
or us in intelligence apparatus kind of guy,
former CIA chief admits US meddling in foreign elections,
quote for their own good.
He was on, I think it was M-S-N-B-C when he said
that, laughed about it.
It's just, it's so grotesque how obvious a lot of this is.
Now on that same note, this is how, in
how absurd this is getting,
and I genuinely believe that this,
this is the genie outta the bottle of this guys.
Now there's gonna be other things that are gonna swing
around new narratives and new agendas,
but my point is, the idea that the United States government,
which by the way I think has been gone for a long time, was,
is this altruistic entity
that's saving everybody and spreading democracy.
It's insulting. I don't think even
Americans are lapping this up anymore.
Only people trapped in the two party illusion.
And really increasingly just on the right at this point,
that doesn't mean we have to hate the country.
The point is that the, we're not,
we're talking about the country versus the government.
And that of course, when the right really blends those
together, they're not the same thing.
Your government is simply representatives of you.
At least that's what we're told how it's supposed to be.
You are the country as the people.
We are the country, right?
So to say you hate the country is
to suggest you hate everybody in this country.
And I think that's ridiculous. What we're talking about is
disdain for a criminal entity that does not care about you.
And in fact is quite evidently self-evidently
working on the, for in, in the interest
of a foreign country at the expense of our interest.
And many of the people in the two party illusion will scream
to defend that thinking they're fighting for America
or realizing they're not and not caring.
But here's Matt Miller. You know, the one
that's been screaming that they're not committing any crimes
in Israel, right up until his last thing he said
nothing, not a crime.
They're, they have no evidence of committed.
I mean, think about actually standing by that.
Here's what he says. International law demands
that Russia pay for what Putin destroyed.
Think about saying that right now, especially with, with
how much destruction is on full display.
Just, I mean, even think about that
with just pretend their entire narrative is true even though
it's verifiably not does that just so Hamas is there.
So that's okay. You destroyed every school
and every hospital and mo I mean, I don't know
how they think this is making sense to anybody.
Maybe it's just desperate. But then to come out
and say international law demand that Russia do the thing
that we're very clearly not applying to Israel.
It says it's also what the Ukrainian people deserve,
but Palestinians just don't matter.
Apparently we're working with the G seven partners
to remedy the damage that Putin continues to cause.
It's just so embarrassing
because they know that we see this in most cases, right?
They must, here's what he said. I'll let you hear it.
- One more crucial step that we can take making Russia pay
for Ukraine's recovery and reconstruction.
What Putin destroyed Russia should and must pay to rebuild.
It's what international law demands.
It's what the Ukrainian people deserve.
Our Congress has given us the power
to seize Russian assets in the United States.
We intend to use it.
We're working with our G seven partners to see
that Russia's immobilized sovereign assets are used
to remedy the damage that Putin continues to cause.
- And I mean, at least in, I, I'm not, I don't know
what assets he's specifically talking about here,
but in my experience in most cases,
that ends up being Russian assets, right?
Some rich oligarch, which probably is not an honest person,
but my point is it's the illegality of what they do.
The rampant lawlessness nod to George George, uh,
Galloway, I love that phrasing.
I that there just steal a yacht from a Russian oligarch
and act like we're going after the government.
I mean, they, this is absurd and it's just, it's it's mafia.
It's, I mean, I was actually rereading Whitney's book again
and just the, the, the self, the, the concept of the overlap
of just this mafia tactic, right?
Like the, just very clearly that that's exactly
what they are, just giving themselves a different name.
- The G seven can unlock billions of dollars
and send a powerful message to Putin.
The time is not on his side.
- So you're going to seize assets under the argument
that Putin, which by the way,
they're still in an ongoing situation, like the idea
that you're pretending like in the midst of this,
you're gonna jump in as you have to pay for all of this.
Well, I mean, the bottom line is that the entire premise
of their argument is false.
What's going on is not a one-sided act of aggression.
That's childishly stupid.
And and you could even make the argument that the beginning
of what happened in Gaza was not,
but I still disagree with the overall point there
because of how long this has been happening.
Well, let's just say you woke up on October 7th
and pretended everything started right there.
Af after seven plus months of ongoing destruction
with even their admission
that there's barely been any rockets flying
after the first three months because
they ran out of things they need.
It's clear that this is not some response of defense.
And by the way, it's still ongoing in the same concept.
The point even they would make is
that we'll wait till we have to, you know, wait
for this to be finished.
We're not gonna worry about this
or that until we're done with our engagement.
It's just everything they do is one-sided.
Everything they do is hypocritical.
They apply it in a one in a selective way
to the people they don't like.
It's like the, it's like we're, it's like in,
we're in elementary school or high school, you know?
And that's what people are beginning to recognize,
that these people are not worthy of your respect.
They're not worthy of anything but disdain in my opinion.
I'm not talking about just any American
politician or anybody in power.
I'm talking about these people
because of what they're doing,
because of how obviously they do not believe in any
of the things that they push forward
because they know we believe them.
He censored news highlighted this very well in regard
to Sam Mussi just continuing
to call out this complete liar Patel, pat Patel,
and ultimately asking about the Geneva Convention and, and,
and pushing it so well in such the right moments to make it
unbelievably clear that they're avoiding even acknowledging
that Israel's bound by it.
Watch it for yourself. It's a six minute clip, I believe.
Yeah, it's really well done.
And here's what Shea Boes had to say about this department
of state making a similar argument.
Congress has given us the power to seize Russian assets in
the US and we intend to use it just absolute criminals.
We're working with the G seven partners to see
that Russia's immobilized sovereign assets are used
to remedy the damage Putin causes.
Now, do you believe that's gonna go back to Ukraine?
You'd be quite naive to think
that I guarantee they're gonna, well, I mean,
even if you think some of it's gonna go to building things,
let's say just like Iraq
and every other example you look, it's gonna go
to outsourced American companies with the,
that ultimately maximize their benefit
at the expense of the country.
And I mean, it's what happens every single time.
If you really wanted to help the country,
you would find local companies
to do it so you could help the economy.
They never do that.
It says we're, and
and the point here is that they highlight, he,
I presume Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Cambodia,
Iraq, Korea, and Serbia can all expect
to receive their trillion dollar compensation checks from
you any day now, right?
Hypocrites? I mean, come on.
Nobody honest can actually stand back
and act like this makes sense when you've, every,
I mean more than any other government I've ever seen in my
life, any other country being led
by a belligerent government ever that's destroyed.
I mean, in the context of the, let's just say incurrent,
living memory, destroying so many countries,
leaving them in complete tatters
with the argument being you're going to do this
for freedom and democracy.
I mean, even if you accidentally went the wrong direction,
aren't you still responsible?
Of course not. It's just insulting our bertran rights.
Imagine if that principle pretending they have
to rebuild all of this based on what's going on
actually applied universally, how much the US would need
to repay for countries destroyed over the years.
Instead, when they left Afghanistan,
not only didn't they repay anything, their two,
they stole the country's reserves
and realize guys, they mine the we,
the mountains while they were there.
They called it defraying, the cost of assistance
otherwise known as destruction and destabilization
and the, the poppy fields
and everything else we've discussed.
He says, best proof you're going to get
that the only rule they follow is might, is right.
In fact, that's become a,
they're almost on the surface argument.
Donald Trump made that very clear Here is
st what she says here is incredible.
Now, my honest opinion, she's sitting here in Israel,
which again, why in the world are members of Congress
so frequently going to just Israel
to make statements about Israel?
I think we all know the answer to that.
The point is, here she is and here,
or arguing that basically America is
based on like, I mean the way she makes this sound is
that Israel has a mi an ID ideology.
Israel has the belief system and that's like, and,
and that we are like them, you know, aside from the fact
that the United States was created long before Israel was,
but you know, let's, let's always
slant it towards this concept.
I mean, it's, it's in, let my honest opinion, she's,
she's reading this piece of paper.
I I genuinely feel like she was handed this and she read it.
That's my opinion. But listen for yourself.
- I come here to Jerusalem, I share,
I sense a shared destiny,
one embedded in your national anthem, Hatti hatikva,
the hope Israel is indeed a miracle, an outpost of freedom,
of western values of civilization.
A striking example of human potential,
the physical embodiment of herzl's maxim, if you will.
It, it is no dream,
- You know, aside from all the ethnic cleansing, rape
and murder and pillaging, absolute destruction,
ongoing ethnic cleansing, you know,
aside from all of that Yeah.
All about western values and civilization, right?
Maybe if we're talking about Western government values,
well then absolutely.
It's just in, it's insulting to have somebody stand there
and patronize us all acting like we're not,
we don't have eyes that we can't very clearly see
what they're doing, that they proudly announce it,
that they do dances around.
They, I mean, I'm gonna show you clips in a minute,
you know, an hour or so probably
of these IDF soldiers playing on the toys
of dead children in Gaza on the toys
of dead children in Gaza
or throwing their, their China wear out the, you know, or
or murdering people in cold blood laughing about it.
But yeah, it's, it's all
because clearly you either are too completely lost
to see any of this or something has compromised you.
It's no way we can act like this is an honest situation.
No way.
- It's the same founding ethos that we prize in America,
the American dream, which says that with hard work,
the right values, you can build a life for yourself,
your family, and your community
- At the expense of an entire other family, right?
Is that how that ends? That we can remove that family
that we don't like the different color
that we can say we, we don't want them there.
Here's our dream. On top of your dead one,
freedom, democracy,
- Herzl's dream and the American dream.
These dreams are precious
and we must cherish, protect
and fight for them. We know we have different,
- So this is my point though.
So you're not what you're, so in
what world are we talking about?
Something that's 75 years old?
Well, more than that really,
but the foundation of Israel at the very least
and the conversation that that is, you know, one
and the same like it a anybody on us would frame this as if,
if you think they're the same, which they're not
that Israel adopted our concept as a much longer
and longer established country, but it's, this is my point.
It it's these people are very clearly influenced
to such a strong degree that they do things
that are not just for Israel,
but at the expense of Americans.
And if everyone out there trying to scream
that this is about Jews, you're the one making that problem.
This is my, I say this constantly, only Zionists
and racist are making this about Judaism,
like the person I'm arguing with online right now.
The idea that you all you can ultimately say is you just
secretly wink wink hate Jews.
And it's, it's painful. I mean, it's, it's embarrassing.
I'm embarrassed for them. Like, like I said the other day,
feel free to make the argument that you think
that I'm somehow missing it, that I'm being manipulated
by secret Jew haters,
and I don't even know, of course that's possible,
but to just make the argument that they know
that I secretly feel a certain way, despite the fact
that I explicitly say the opposite
and everything I do shows that we're absolutely fighting
for Jewish people, Muslim people, Christian people, anybody
who are being oppressed and lied about as we can see
with the campus protests that are being run in many cases
by Jewish organizations with Holocaust survivors.
But apparently we're anti-Jewish
because we pointed that, I mean,
I'm embarrassed for these people.
It really is that bad.
And again, I think some of them are just
so lost in this conversation that they don't recognize it.
And I'm not saying that about people like this.
I am absolutely convinced
that people like this are either compromised
or are being, uh, you know, are, are opportunists,
that they take money from APAC and everything else,
and they let that influence everything they do.
Realistically, if this was at any other time,
this could be called treason
- Difficult days ahead to ensure this always remains true.
Prime Minister Netanyahu recently said
that if Israel must stand alone, it will.
- And so what do you, what does that even mean?
You mean aside from the, the constant bowing
and scraping of people like you
and the entire US government?
Where's this world in which Israel stands alone?
They have the power structures
behind them in every single po.
What they're really talking about is the fact
that public opinion has been lost.
We now see them, the Zionist entity in the Israeli
government of the crimes they've committed.
Many are also Jewish,
but keep pretending like we wink, wink, hate all the Jews.
People like this are caught.
What they're doing is illegal in my opinion at this point.
They are absolutely acting in
the interest of a foreign country.
- I am here to tell you that it is our duty as Americans
that Israel does not stand alone.
- How is that at our duty as Americans,
you're telling me it's my duty as an American to stand
with a foreign country?
Because you say so.
I mean, just think about how wild that is.
Our duty as Americans is to protect the constitution
and protect fellow Americans and,
and help maintain the things that we hold sacred.
None of that has to do with a 75-year-old ethnic cleansing,
settler colonial project.
- We must never let Israel stand alone.
I'm confident in the end
that our relationship will not just endure,
but emerge stronger than ever before Israel.
Keep fighting. We are with you.
God bless Israel and God bless the United States of America.
Thank you for this tremendous honor.
- God, that's just so shocking.
And remember, I, I called this person out,
didn't I didn't even, I still
generally don't even know who she is.
I I just didn't know who, I don't recognize her when I first
saw it, where she was the one that was like,
and I think I forget who all said it,
that her entire career seems
to be hinging on this aggressive push to frame the world
as in some dark cloud of antisemitism.
I remember. And she was the one that was calling out the
campus, uh, presidents, which was completely backed
by all the rabid right wing people that wanted to go
after them because they were woke
and they don't like the way they think, which many
of them were, but it just shows you
that they're being manipulated using that kind of perception
of the woke mindset to attack people that at
that point didn't vote, didn't deserve it.
They were not saying anything other than
what was generally the reality
that people are out there saying things
that you're taking outta context.
People are not saying we're going after the Jew.
And this has been made very clear by other Jewish people.
In fact, people like Michael Tracy online
or people like Glenn Greenwald who broke this down in exact,
I mean in every way, scathingly went
over every single angle of this.
And you can prove that everything they're framing it
as is not just dishonest, but completely manufactured.
Not to say that there's not racism
or other examples of pretty minor
benign actions of violence.
And I mean that in the sense of people getting,
you know, pushing back and forth.
There is everything they're highlighting in this
conversation is based on absolute lies.
I mean, it's not my opinion at this point.
I mean, I I just recently played the Glenn Greenwell
breakdown where he makes this very clear,
and of course they're gonna start calling him an antisemite
even though he is Jewish himself because this is ridiculous.
But realizing that, my point was
that she was the one leading that investigation.
And her, it's like you, her hands were shaking while she was
like screaming over the top of them.
And at that you could tell that she was un out of her depth
and some of them even resigned, you know?
And, and I'm not gonna, I probably disagree with most
of the things they believe and I'm pretty anti
or, uh, uh, what's the word I'm looking for?
Like, I just believe the college structure today
is a complete scam, quite frankly.
And I think a lot of people understand that.
But regardless of any of it, the point is
that they were simply showing you
that they were not just ca there wasn't the lie
that they were pushing forward and they cast them aside.
Anyway, now let's get into
the conversation of the crash.
Now, just before that, we're gonna come back
to the conversation of Israel in a second.
I mean, even the crash itself seems to implicate Israel
and the United States,
but it's really important that we recognize
that this is striking.
It's obvious these people do not believe about
international law.
If they're willing to ignore every single thing that
that contradicts, that when it comes from their allies from
themselves, how can they,
and that never used to be quite seen by everybody.
And I think again, what Israel did, the seven months
of ongoing genocide
that shook everybody awake from all this,
that can't be put away.
Now. We see it plenty of average people
that have never even thought
to question the ongoing democracy
around the world they're spreading have now seen it
and they can't put it away.
And they tried out people like this to try
to push you back in.
And these, these are cartoons today.
These people are not worthy of your respect.
Here's from Associated Press another example of something
that I think is very easy to connect back
to the very same people we're talking about
because of the many different times they've all,
they've discussed this kind of conversation, even threatened
to assassinate these people statements
from Lindsey Grant, for example.
But then you get into all the facts
and even the statements already made by Israel
and their tangential outlets.
It's, I mean, at the very least they want you
to think they did this, but it's says helicopter crash
that killed Iran's president
and others could reverberate across the Middle East.
Now, this is my point about how these platforms work.
It's insulting that they try to water this down with all
of the lies that we, that I'll prove to you again are lies.
And again, the fact that it's coming from
Jerusalem seems interesting to me.
I mean, that's not unless I'm mis unaware
that they're now only based outta Jerusalem.
I find it interesting that the overlap seemed
to be coming from Jerusalem, most of these cases from ap.
But in any case, it says the helicopter crash in which
Iranian President I, Abraham Reese raci,
the country's foreign minister
and other officials were killed
and likely is likely to reverberate across the Middle East
where Iran's influence runs wide and deep .
It's just the whole thing is meant to be like this.
See, you know, downplay that this was a criminal action.
But ju without saying it, sort of make it seem acceptable
because look at all the bad things we do
that are Israel says they're doing.
But that's, that's not, it's from any
of these situations we cover, is it somehow that oh,
well this person deserved it so the law doesn't matter.
Well, not when it applies to their adversaries.
Same thing with Israel bombing Syria all the time
and just going, well, Iran's there.
Well, that's not a crime, okay?
Nobody who cares, we'll move forward.
It, there's nothing more than that.
They just go, well, Iran bad guy,
and they're doing bad things and we think
they're terrorists, okay?
None of that means anything. They're not,
there's not a crime being committed.
They're, they're, they're legally, they're allies of Syria.
Even if you're talking about weapon ship, weapon, weapons,
shipments, it's not a crime guys.
They're allies. They can sell weapons back
and forth just like the US does
with the worst people in the world, in fact.
So the fact that they keep doing it shows you
that they are very clearly showing you
that they believe they're above the law.
And in many cases they appear to be, at least as it comes
to the US government, their control of it.
When their influence runs wide
and deep, they're really trying
to create the idea this is somehow justified.
He goes, that's because Iran has spent decades supporting
armed groups and militants in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq,
Yemen, and Palestinian Territories.
Well, yeah, they do support them. They support their
right of self-defense.
The actual reality of a occupied territory
with armed resistance
and the idea that these polices are, are, are occupied,
are suppressed, are in fact being attacked.
So they support that. But anything more than that,
I argue there's very clear support in ways
that you could prove in some cases like weapons and, and
or, uh, I mean the general things you might expect
for allies, the argument that they're proxy elements,
which is really where I'm going with that
is I think ridiculous.
And in fact, the State Department
and plenty in the past have admitted that fact.
It's like we'll show you next with the idea
of the nuclear program, which we know is also even the State
Department, or rather I'll come to it next.
The US government admitted that's not what's happening,
but they still spread these lies.
Are we, are you, are we to believe
that the Associated Press isn't aware of its own article
where it says that , we'll come back to it,
but it says that's because they've spent decades
supporting all these groups.
Which by the way, if you look at every single one of them,
they're all fighting against
occupying territories for their freedom.
But they're all terrorists apparently allowing it
to project power
and potentially deter attacks from the United States
or Israel, right?
So they're working with allies
to stop those people from the US
and Israel from attacking them.
What, what terrorists?
This is the sworn enemies of the Islamic Revolution.
You mean the time when they took it back from the
US and Israel occupation?
Uh, we'll just leave that part out. That was Operation Ajax.
But it says, tensions have been never been higher than they
were last month when Iran under RACI
and Supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Kini, launched hundreds
of drones and ballistic missiles in Israel in response
to an Israeli attack on a consulate.
Yeah, that's how you cover that. You mean the
monumental violation of national norms of the bombing
of an Israeli consulate, which was a huge shift in po.
But that's the small thing there where they responded
with drones and bombs because of the thing Israel did.
That's how they f that's
how they frame this in everything that they do.
Well, the point should be Israel attacked a embassy,
the consulate building of an embassy with killing generals,
killing officers,
killing innocent people from other countries.
And that's a huge deal.
And so Iran, in the right of their actual right
of self-defense attacked And even then, I would argue
as always, that's not actual self-defense.
It's just a legal right to respond to the attack.
Self-defense is responding as you're being attacked.
But that's of course not a big deal.
It's only because Iran did something.
That's the thing we care about.
But it says Israel's long viewed Iran as its greatest threat
because of their controversial nuclear program.
Just so we're clear, again, this is the AP
from last year July.
US Intelligence Assessment says Iran not currently
developing nuclear weapons 'cause they're not.
And also in this article, which I won't get into for time,
they make the ga the argument that somehow
that they're violating, the point is always is
that the United States government pulled out
of the joint comprehension plan of action, the J-C-P-O-A
and in that very deal gave them allowances
to begin increasing enrichment
because they broke the deal until they were to come back.
Now you can argue that they've gone
beyond whatever limit was set within that conversation.
But the point is that there is no deal anymore.
They broke the deal
and they wanted it, Iran wanted this deal to be in place.
They wouldn't allow it.
And so then the argument that they're now doing
what they want to do with their nuclear program is
like every other country in the world.
The only reason it's becomes the problem is
because we say Iran, bad guy, Israel's got nukes,
then we don't even allow them to talk.
They pretend like it's not happening even though everyone
in the world knows it's happening.
And the reality even on top of that is,
is is I'm not even sure I wanna take at face value the
claims of 60% enrichment,
but they need 90% to even begin
to make the material to then make a bomb.
And they're not even there, not even close.
And the point is, they're even occu continuing to say
that they will bring that back down
to the regulation ar levels of the deal should they want
to initiate this deal.
I I actually argue that
that's probably no longer on the table.
It was before all this started.
My point in all of that is the absurd game they play
or they're acting like they're somehow right on
two minutes away from a bomb.
They've been saying that for 40 years
and routinely the i, ie,
the International Atomic Energy Agency,
and even now the United States has said
that's not even actually happening.
But who cares though? Let's break it down in a way
that makes it seem like the, the murdering
of these people in the helicopter was somehow justified.
If that's ultimately what happened.
It says Resu was a hard liner viewed as a protege
and possible successor
to kamini chastised Israel last month saying, get ready
for this because this is terrorist talk.
The Zionist Israel regime has been committing oppression
against the people of Palestine for 75 years.
Oh my gosh. He said the terrorist thing, right?
Or just stating the obvious reality
of the illegal occupation.
It says quote, first of all, we have to expel the usurers
so the people illegally occupying.
That makes sense. Secondly,
we should make them pay the cost for all the damages.
Oh, sounds sort of like this.
But we can't apply it to this conversation
because that would be equal handed or equally handed.
Oops, here we go. And it says, thirdly, we have
to bring the justice to the oppressors and the asurs.
I mean, it, it's, it's talk about law, basically.
But that's the bad thing. And they can't say
the things if it comes from them.
'cause that's terrorism. It's just car.
It's comical, it's bad.
People can see through this today
and I think they're desperately, uh, worried about that.
My point, though is that the overall point about the
usurpers and expelling them, if you listen to
what they're saying today, they're talking
about the Zionist entity.
They're not just talking about every single Israeli,
I guarantee there are people that feel that way.
And even then the reality would be technically
that would be the legal justification.
It would be legally sound.
But nobody really
who has standing in this
conversation is making that argument.
Not, I'm not either. 'cause it doesn't really make sense.
It would be in a way creating a similar problem in reverse.
And I don't think that's justified.
The, i i for an eye concept is
not something we should be going for.
The point is that they want to get rid of the occupiers,
the Zionist con entity, have them pay damages for
what they created and bring them to justice.
Of course, when you frame it as the thing
they want you to hear it as well.
That's when it becomes dangerous point is clear.
I think that the, trying
to make it sound like this was okay,
now let's get into the details of what happened.
There's Kamini simply saying, with with deep sorrow
and regret, he has received the bitter news of the martyr,
the, the killing of the president, which it was only as
of today, early 4:00 AM because it, it was yesterday.
There seemed to be some confusion
and we'll get into why I think that is about what happened.
And it was a hard crash and, you know, the,
and even seemingly get putting out sentiments that it was
not that they didn't die.
Now, I think there's a couple reasons for that,
why that might have happened.
One we'll get into being that this was coming from an, uh,
uh, um, an unfriendly source
or people that were pretending
to be somebody making these statements.
And we'll show you what I mean by that.
Or it could be that they were just trying to downplay.
That's always what happens, right?
They don't want people to know that they had got the plane
or, you know, they wanna downplay
how well the operation went.
Beloki points out something interesting yesterday.
He says, it is noteworthy that the last meeting
of the Iranian president wast actually
what the Azerbaijani President
Israel has established an intelligence base, an airfield,
and an agreement to develop two new surveillance satellites
from Azerbaijan.
All of that is about Iran. Interesting.
Israel accounts for almost 70%
of azerbaijan's significant weapons imports.
Now is that worthy of like this the same it
to imply their actions equally would, would be to argue
that Iran could bomb Azerbaijan whenever it wants
because they say Israel's present killing civilians,
killing bombing the hospitals, bombing the airports,
but saying, well, Iran,
and then having the rest of the world go,
oh, okay, yeah, that makes sense.
That's crazy. It's illegal. It is rampantly lawless.
But he says that the, the 70%
of azerbaijan's significant weapons imports coming from
Israel, that's billions of dollars worth
of ballistic missiles, air defense systems
and kamikaze drones, billions, all of
that necessitates an increasing interroga integration
of military operations between the two
of Azerbaijan and Israel.
He says at least 40% of Israel's oil is supplied
by Azerbaijan via a pipeline that runs through Turkey
one month into the Gaza genocide, a joint venture
between Azerbaijan's state oil company
and Israel Natural gas lines was signed
to export gas to Israel.
He says, as Israel's number one customer for arms,
the Zionist entity is more deeply embedded within the
military system of Azerbaijan than anywhere else.
Time will reveal more. It's very interesting.
So the simple implication being that the meeting there,
knowing that that was gonna happen, knowing
that Azerbaijan is very tied in with Israel,
they might have set something up to, to create this just
as a thought considering the facts on the table.
And this is, this is why people are, you know,
certain manipulators
and people that don't, that just wanna follow along
with the crowd screech about conspiracy theory.
The point is that any gen, any researcher,
any investigative journalist, anything you,
you consider possibilities, you theorize that's what you do.
It's not bad to do. So they just don't want you
to look at things other than what they hand you.
So they scream. It's all conspiracy theory.
The point is, of course this is relevant.
It may not end up being what happened,
but why would you not consider this overlap?
It's, it's just bad journalism for, for people that don't.
And I'm not, that's my the other point is not to say
that we know because of this.
No, that would be assumption
or just simply highlighting the facts
and people that wanna pretend that's what you're doing,
we'll make that case.
But this person highlights the US Air Force,
the C 17 RCH 3 48 landing at
Baku Azerbaijan.
This is on the 19th.
That's literally the first time such flights occurred in one
year, and it has to be now, and it happens to be now.
So now we're finding out that the US Air Force went
to barge Bajan on the 19th, the day this was going on.
And they asked somebody rightly asked,
how can we confirm it good for them?
And they give the link because that's, it's, that's what,
that's what good, I mean this is rare,
increasingly rare on Twitter today
that people provide the source material, but there it is.
You can look for yourself. So that's interesting.
So we have the US joining essentially at some level
before this happened in the location.
I mean now Onlo English,
and there's a link here you can read more about it simply
highlights that e uh, so at this point, after the 19th and
after the crash, there was kind of a
confusion and people were arguing.
They didn't know what happened. They didn't know where the,
where the helicopter had crashed.
There was all this confusion, which doesn't really make much
sense outside of there possibly being some kind of outside
electronic interference.
But after completing its mission in Iran, Turkish UAV
basically the, the one of the UAVs went out
and I guess using, using heat signatures was able
to identify what they argued was where the crash took place.
Which I find interesting the idea
that Turkey somehow was like immediately able to find this.
I mean, at the very least, the question should be whether
that that might mean that they weren't somehow involved.
I'm not saying there's any evidence to that effect,
but I just find that something we should ask always
considering the possibilities.
Because Turkey always plays a very interesting role in all
these things, kind of its own island of, you know,
within nato, but essentially it's interesting,
but ident it says identifies location of wreckage
of a helicopter carrying the Iranian president.
And then weirdly does this, flies around looking and looking
and end up going all the way over here
and then creating no, the crescent moon,
the, the symbol of, of Turkey as if that's
where this was supposed to happen,
I guess like right where the crash was.
It's very strange, very strange. You can read more about it.
It comes directly from on doula English.
Okay, so here's what Alan Ms.
Rahi points out in regard
to the time that it was disappearing.
He goes, how does a president's helicopter
disappear without a trace for long hours
inside of their own country?
He goes, think about this. It's bizarre.
And to make it even more puzzling,
the president's helicopter was one of a group
of three flying together.
Consider the amount of electronic
signals such a flight generates.
You have the president's security, surely this
with satellite communication
and all kind of other secure communication systems.
Now, first of all, let's make sure we recognize despite the
screeching lies of the US government in Israel,
Iran is very technologically advanced.
In fact more in some cases than both those countries.
And the point is that the idea is that think of like
what the Air Force one
or any number of, you know, anything flying Biden
or them around what kind of technological advancements
and things that they might be using for,
you know, just consider that.
And he's saying, surely with satellite communication
and all their kinds of secure communication systems,
then there's the helicopter itself with all its normal
and special communication equipment.
Finally, there's all the cellular noise.
All those people are generating work calls,
family calls, long flight.
There's always someone on the phone he says with, you know,
VIPs and attendance and say communication suddenly
and totally stops, which is what we're told happened
with the president's helicopter.
What do the other two pilots do?
All the security and military people, they just carry on
and think, oh well they'll probably catch up.
No. Or do they stop, mark the exact location
of the last known communication
and raise hell initiating a mega search protocol,
which didn't seem to happen until after the crash.
He goes maybe landing as close as possible to the point
of disappearance and waiting for search
and rescue people to start for work from that spot.
The most reasonable explanation for such complete confusion
and disorientation is
that they were jammed completely using electronic warfare,
which I think makes sense or maybe fooled into believing
that they were still in contact
with the president's helicopter,
which is interesting, right?
So thinking that they were in fact still all in line,
but really that that claim
that had already gotten pulled away or,
and I'll let him finish his point.
He goes, which may explain how nobody knew
where it disappeared even approximately two days ago,
Hezbollah took out one
of Israel's most advanced intelligence gathering pieces
of equipment, sophisticated deep reaching
attack into Northern Israel.
And we know that modern militaries are perfectly capable
of cracking, jamming, communication lines
and fooling other militaries.
This could be the freakiest of accidents,
certainly could be, and it could be
that a 71-year-old poet decided
to assassinate Slovakia's Prime Minister just
as the US was trying to recommit European countries
to supplying a supporting Ukraine.
Anything's possible, I guess. But I think what's important
to think about is the idea of the signal.
Like basically thinking about the possibility
of creating a situation where the person
that was manipulated via electronic warfare might think
that they're flying normally
and they fly into the side of a mountain
or that they think the other
ones right next to them and they're not there.
This is the kind of level we're at today.
I'm surprised we don't get more
of this conversation and I think we know why.
Here is Lord Bo bebo pointing something out.
He goes on to say here, that was it.
A smart GPS sabotage of Rey's helicopter, the president,
the crashed helicopter on which he was flying was an
American Bell two 12.
The Tasneem agency reports that it could carry up
to 14 people and had a cruising speed
of 190 kilometers per hour.
It must, it must be said right away
that the Bell two 12 helicopter is an old machine,
a twin engine version of the bell, uh,
2 0 4, 2 0 5 developed in the early seventies
by Bell Helicopter text row for the Canadian Armed Forces.
Most of these helicopters have already been written off.
These helicopters were delivered to the,
to Iran back in the days when Iran was ruled by the,
the Shah who was the occupied force under
Operation Ajax, right?
The illegal puppet that was put there.
Since then, their airworthiness has
been maintained by the Iranians.
The VIP version has an increased payload,
but a shorter flight range in climb rate at all.
Bell two twelves are currently assigned
to the Iranian Presidential Air Squadron, the version
of the collision on a mountain in
with a mountain in thick fog in principles.
I logical right, that you just lose where you're going.
But why did they lose the, uh, guidance systems and so on?
The helicopter did not have any special,
and my point would be then why wasn't this,
there was no warning signal.
Like this seems to be some kind
of a complete blackout situation
where everyone's confused until they find them.
The helicopter did not have any special
navigation equipment for flying blind.
That's interesting, right?
So, you know, that should you yank out some
of the things they need, they don't have anything
that ultimately kicks into in those situations like
current vehicles do.
And the version of piloting air
could be taken as the main one.
But there is one circumstance immediately
after the disappearance of the helicopter reports appeared
that two people flying with raci, one of whom
that was the helicopter pilot, allegedly got in touch
and described the incident as non-fatal, which we know
that's not the case, or at least that's what the, you know
what all the reporting is highlighting
that he has been confirmed, killed.
I guess that could also be a lie.
But it says, when examining the wreckage, it turned out
that all the people on board died at the time
of the collision, right?
So then who contacted the ground?
In fact, diverting search forces away.
And most importantly, why, right?
I mean that's a huge point right there.
So we're talking about somebody who got in contact
after the fatal crash and said, no, nobody died.
So, and, and diverting the search forces to them and then
after the fact it turns out they did.
So who was that? What happened and why did they take a time?
And then my point is arguably
that could have been somebody else.
None of, not even somebody present a Mossad
or CI agent, for example.
It says, considering that the main navigation device in
foggy conditions on board the helicopter was a GPS
navigation system, we can assume a version
of navigation sabotage is possible.
I would say having the exact time of departure at,
of the helicopter from the Azerbaijani Iraqis border point,
the Americans could have sharply roughed up the GPS signals
in the cell where the helicopter was flying as a result
of which the pilot could have directed the helicopter into a
Iraq believing
that he was flying over a valley in his safe altitude.
That's very possible.
Mensch, uh, OIN points out an Israeli.
So now, okay, so forget we have a US plane
that flew into Azerbaijan the day this happened,
which apparently hadn't happened in a very long time.
Now, on the same day, an Israeli military transport plane,
a C one three OJ that took off from the,
an Israeli air base apparently turned off its transponder
before landing in Morocco.
I mean, is that not crazy? I mean, to me that's a
huge red flag obviously.
So my point is, you have them fly flying from here,
turning off the transponder.
What you're seeing here is the suggested flight rate,
like the, you know, the planned flight path
and then ending up in Morocco realizing that the, you know,
Iran would be to the west
or the east, I'm sorry, the east, you know,
to the other direction, right?
So if you were gonna try
to create a plausible deniability here,
end up in the other side of the country
or other side of Africa, of that router all the way
to the wrong direction, hmm,
maybe that'd be the way to do it.
Carry out something, at least being close enough to Iran
to be able to execute whatever signal meant malfunction.
We're talking about manipulation, then turning around,
going back to Morocco and then ending like,
you know the point, my point would be to find out whether
or not the timeframe was as long as it was supposed to be.
I wasn't able to find that out, right?
So how long would this flight normally take
and how long did it end up being?
That might have a, a very important indication if somebody
finds that out, please let me know.
Either case, you have an Israeli plane
that turns it transponder off
at the same day this is happening.
An American plane that lands in Azerbaijan,
they go leaving from Azerbaijan,
a very clearly Israeli influenced group
and then apparently Israeli media ports,
the Iranian president was dead before Iran did .
I mean this is ridiculous.
Then this person says they know
before the Iranians that's quite telling
this is what happened guys.
I mean it's, and and things like this as well.
This is my point guys. Israeli war room on May 19th again,
before anybody really even knew what was going on,
they tweeted out a helicopter.
Are we, I mean this is either them wanting you
to think they did this or admitting they did this.
Either way it's disgusting
and it says you could, this person says you could have at
least pretended you were not behind this.
Just saying think about that.
Here is one
of the last overlaps that I find to be very interesting.
Now this is very hypothetical, the great video on this,
but, so if we're talking about the idea
of simply manipulating the situation with signals,
that would mean that you would have to wait
for the certain cur, you know, assume
that the weather would be enough to be able
to manipulate them
so they wouldn't be able to see where they were going, right?
But that would be just like a random happenstance,
unless you simply ask the question, is it possible
to create the weather the way they want it to look?
So it was foggy before executing this.
Now of course this is where all the people out there are
gonna scream that were conspiracy theorists.
I'm not saying you could prove this,
I'm saying it's something to consider.
And before we read what he's talking about here,
don't forget Iran, top military officials in Iran have said
for many years that Israel is literally using weather
modification to stop it from
raining and snowing in their country.
Which Mike, like why in the world would we bach at
that right now knowing that that's possible,
knowing it's been around for such a long time, knowing
that Israel has used these things
before, why would they not use it against an enemy
that they're trying to starve, which is what they're doing.
Just hypothetical though,
we don't know whether it is plying to this conversation.
Here's what he says. It's in the,
the account is in into thin air.
He says you won't believe this. It seems that Iran
or a large portion of the Middle East,
and this is the part that you can prove,
has apparently removed the entire day
of May 19th from the weather charts.
Okay? So it, it takes a lot of willful blindness to not go,
okay, so they, they removed the May 19th from the weather
charts and all the rest of the things we talked about,
the Israeli plane turning out this transponder a US plane
being an JE pajan right before they leave all of this stuff.
It kind of hard that to ask what that adds up to.
But he goes on to put, to point out
what he thinks might be the case.
He goes, is this to stop people from seeing the details
about what caused the fog
that locals said came out of nowhere?
And there's a lot of reports about
that fog that came out of nowhere.
You can find that a lot of different places being reported
this led to the helicopter crash of Iran's president.
Why are they hiding the satellite data?
Was this the, was this weather created
also Attached is the likely video
of the crash its site itself.
So first let's play what is what into thin air had
to say about this, right everybody,
welcome back May 19th, 2024.
And I wanted to check out the weather
that was taking place while they said the helicopter,
the president of Iran was in a helicopter crash
and they said it was due to some weird fog.
Now I'm gonna show you something very weird when it comes
to the weather in this area called Jfa.
This is where the helicopter crashed.
They said it was right here on the border,
right near this city Jfa.
And here's the border right here.
So it was in this area somewhere.
So what I did was I lined this up with a weather chart.
It's not exactly easy to get weather reports for this part
of the world, but I did find some
and that is here on the CIRA weather website.
A very detailed chart you can use. And here we are.
This is the Middle East. We're looking at Jfa
right in this area here.
Can't get much closer without it being very pixelated.
But I wanna show you something interesting.
You could see the date up here we're on May 18th.
Now this happened the morning
or early in the day on the 19th
and now it's obviously a whole different time.
So as I move this, you're gonna notice something weird.
We get into nightfall, this is the beginning of the night
of the 18th for this part of the world.
And as we move forward, you're gonna notice something,
we're gonna get to the end of this bar here
where we should be moving into the 19th, which is
where we would see the weather
and what's going on in this area when the helicopter crash.
But look what happens here.
They have removed the entire 19th from the weather chart.
You're gonna see 'em just about at the end of the data here.
Watch it goes from the 18th, right to the 20th.
There it goes. Boom, it just pops wow from the 18th
to the 20th, removing the entire 19th day.
So how do we even pretend that's not very clear.
Now I'm not saying that then, like this is the same kind
of thing we make, make we point out in other conversations,
you know about the, you know, any number of things were just
because something clearly is criminal
or that they, you know, that that indicates
that they very clearly wanted to hide something.
We should not then assume what that something is.
But yes, that clearly indicates that there's something
that they did not want us to see, which very well could be
that they sat created this
or at the very least that the weather itself,
whether created or not, somehow indicates
that it shows us that they were involved.
The they, whatever. Something is there.
Though I don't know
how we could pretend that's not the case.
We cannot see what was going on here no matter what setting.
I pick here, and I'll just show you on this chart here.
This overlay here is meant to be able to see fog
and we'd be looking right in this area here.
And again, you move from the 18th across the day.
These take a little bit longer to load,
but once you get all the way to here, it goes from the 18th
to the 20th, right there again,
one click covers an entire day.
So they have removed 24 hours of weather from one
of the biggest weather charts that exists is one
of the most detailed charts we can use
to find weather all over the world.
And we would be able to see exactly
what was going on in this area.
But they have taken the data away.
Once again, I'll show you here is May 20th,
which is in about two hours for the east coast.
But look, I backtrack, it goes right to the 18th.
So the entire day of the 19th is missing.
So we can't see what was going on in this area.
Wow, take that. For what it's worth,
if anyone can find the radar chart for May 19th of this part
of the world, I would love to see it.
Thank you all. Bye-Bye.
I guarantee you somebody, here's his little thing.
He does, he does pretty good work.
I'm not super familiar with his, with his work,
but I've seen some in the past and I, I like it.
It's well broken down.
What I think somebody out there will have it.
There's no way around it guys.
There are people that literally have like channels
that all they do is just monitor whether all the time
or have recordings going all the time.
So whether it ends up in his hands or not is the question,
but I guarantee somebody out there has that,
that will be very interesting to see.
Just like the idea of the timeframe of the flight.
These are things that, this is why they're so afraid
of this kind of journalism, of this kind of people
that are online doing their own work, their own research,
their own due diligence because they can't stop this kind
of, um, uh, crowdsourcing work.
But, but of course that means that people can lie.
People can be wrong. People get very caught
up in their own perspectives.
But, but how is
that different than the corporate media, right?
The point is to be objective
and question everything while considering all possibilities.
But I find that pretty compelling.
Now, here's what he's claiming is the video of
what could be, not for sure,
but could be the crash site, uh, site of the crash itself.
But there's something interesting going on here.
Now, while this is just playing, this is just, just one
of his overlaps, and again, comes from an doula agency.
So the point is, they're simply arguing.
And this, this, I I'm, I think this is the, uh, drone,
you know, like I said, the
heat signature that we're going for.
But as this is playing, you know,
just think about doing this while you're committing
genocide, while the world is seeing you,
while the ICJ is accusing you.
We'll get to that next while, while the inter uh,
international Court of justice has already accused you more
than once, and you're doing things like this
while everyone's paying attention.
I mean, again, it's either shockingly desperate
or they just don't care.
It's incredible. It really is incredible.
Now, let's talk about for a brief moment.
Oh, actually, and this was, oh, I already showed you that.
This is the idea of that, you know, it's not new to argue
that there's weather possible manipulation that is possible.
And then, oh, and I added this last, that's right.
That'll tell you, man, Twitter's been acting
super wonky for me today.
All just, I dunno if this happened to anybody else,
but about a couple hours ago, my entire only Twitter crashed
for every tab I had up every one of them.
It just crashed all across the board.
It was very strange, and it really slow
to load right now, like when I go to another one.
Oh, that one didn't work. But anyway, the point is
that this is a, I added this right at the end.
Uh, this came out today, just recently.
This is, uh, um, uh, Zarif speaking
to media about, um, his opinion on this.
Now, what I wanna make clear about this, he's saying us, is
to blame, but I don't think
he's saying this is the only thing.
And I think what he's saying is kind of just trying
to point out an objective reality for those that are quick
to dismiss possibilities.
And I think this is a great point.
I think there are people that are kind
of attacking him from, you know,
downplaying the possible involvement.
Like, I, we should not be ignoring the possibility
that this was a manipulated weather event.
This was a sap, a weather electronic warfare event.
Definitely. I think the, there's enough evidence there
to suggest that could have been happening.
So he shouldn't be dismissing those things.
My point is that I don't think he would, I, I've, he,
in the past, he's always struck me
as somebody who's been very objective
and very fact-based, despite the screams
of the people from Israel and the United States government.
But he says the US is to blame for the tragedy
of the helicopter crash of the president, which
despite the order of the International Court of Justice,
has embargoed the sale of aircraft
and aviation parts to Iran.
Right? So the point here ultimately is that he's suggesting
that whether or not there's other events that are involved,
simply the fact that there're violating the court
of justice, which again,
every other thing they don't care about any
of these legalities and, and stopping the sale of aircraft
and aviation parts is potentially why they, you know,
if it was just a simple normal crash, well,
you could at least point to the finger at them for saying,
that's why we weren't able to update the aircraft.
I don't think that's what he's saying is the reality.
I don't think that, I think this is just trying to make an,
an intelligent objective point
about whatever you think is happening.
Let's make sure you recognize
that they're violating international court of justice.
They're violating the law,
and every other case in the sense they're stopping parts
that are needed for civilian transport.
You know, that's, that's the point.
The real thing is to recognize
that these groups are criminal.
They're rampantly lawless.
They disregard everything that is sacred to them,
and they will accuse you of everything under the sun
to stop you from seeing what they're doing.
Now, let's get into the conversation of the ICC.
This is what's crazy to me, is this is happening while all
of this stuff is going on, and,
and I'm gonna be right outta the gate with this.
I, I do not feel this is gonna
go in the direction we think it will.
I'm very, very worried about how this is going
to potentially pacify,
but yet not really hold accountable maybe
with somebody like Netanyahu, which again, we need
to realize nobody likes this guy.
People in they're powerful
because of him will like him in so far they have power,
but his own people hate him.
His own government seems to hate him.
The guy is a criminal multiple indictments
who was this close to going to jail before October 7th.
It's very clear that this person is the first to go,
and he knows that too, if
something were to go this direction.
But ICC prosecutor has now openly stated,
they see they are seeking and put
and announcing the warrants for Netanyahu Gallant
and then Hamas leaders, which I find really interesting.
And we'll go over this and I'll show you,
there's two ways I think you can look at this
and I'll wait to make the point about it.
But I think we, it's re the, the point is the,
the interesting dynamic is
that we know Hamas was funded by Israel.
So you can either look at this at them trying to like,
balance it out, which I think is never honest.
It's things are never balanced.
You know, they, well, because we accuse
them, we gotta accuse their side too.
You know, it's like, that's the point is
that when you break this all down, obviously
as I've said many times, Hamas committed crimes,
they took children back as hostages.
There's no way around it. Pretty much all the rest,
it's up in the air for a lot of different reasons in regard
to the IDF Hannibal directive.
I mean, all these different things we've talked about.
Even the, the rape allegations have never been proven.
And, and, and I was gonna
do a whole segment about that today.
I'll probably do it in the next show,
but they're still citing Perilla Patton,
who herself has walked that back
and even on the, at the UN spoke
and said, this wasn't even investigatory.
We did not even not blamed anybody.
And yet they come out and go, they proved
it 'cause they're desperate.
But the point is that it could be that they're just trying
to play it even handed and act like, you know, trying
to avoid the, the, the negative fallout for accusing Israel
of the crimes they're committing, which
it's not working that way for them.
They're getting attacked from both, both Hamas
and Israel at this point, or I'm hopeful for this,
but I don't think it's gonna be the case.
They're making a special point here of going
after the Zionist entity
and their proxies, if you wanna look at it that way.
I don't really, I mean, it's just a thought.
My gut tells me that's not the way it's gonna go,
but it'd be interesting, wouldn't it, if this is going
after Israel and Hamas leaders, not all of Hamas,
because of the fact that we can show
that these leaders are being protected in Qatar
by the Israeli government.
Again, hopeful, don't think that'll be the way it goes.
But I, you know, that's interesting.
Now, this writes from Associated Press from Jerusalem.
The chief prosecutor of the ICC said Monday,
he is seeking arrest warrants for leaders of Israel
and Hamas, including Israeli prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu over his actions taken
during the seven month occupation or war of genocide.
And he, they were at war while Netanyahu
and his defense minister Ga Gallant,
do not face eminent arrest.
They announced the announcement by the ICC,
chief Prosecutor Khan was a symbolic blow
that deepened Israel's isolation over the war in Gaza.
And then again, either way, like I said
before, that is a big hurt that that hurts their agenda.
No matter what ultimately happens,
that will wake up more average people
than knowing that they have done this.
That more the average person
who might have been on the fence is gonna go, okay, well,
they must have looked at the evidence even though
it's rarely how these things work.
But the point is, it's interesting
and it's, it's in the, in, it's in the direction of
shifting opinion, in my eyes the right way about
what the Zionist government is doing.
Now, Khan from the ICC accused, Netanyahu Gallant
and three Hamas leaders,
so even three on one side on the other, which we're morich,
whereas the 15 other entities
that have publicly said they're committing
what you would call genocide, right?
Objectively calling for the death of children,
saying there's nobody innocent calling for Alek.
I mean, it's interesting, but specifically highlights
the three leaders that are being protected in Qatar.
And it says, of war crimes
and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip in Israel,
a panel of three judges will consider the prosecutor's
evidence and determine whether to issue the arrest warrants
and allow a case to proceed.
The judges typical again, right there, though,
you could argue just because they issue
the warrants, it may not go anywhere.
The judges typically take two months to make such decisions.
And even right there, even if it does go the way we want to,
that's two more months of ongoing genocide
that they will not stop.
And even on top of that,
let's just say they knock out Gallant n Netanyahu, everyone
behind them is just as bad right Now, Israel is, uh,
it goes on to say Israel is not a member of the court,
which something we remembered we've talked about many times.
So even if the arrest warrants are issued net and Yahoo
and Galland do not face any immediate risk of prosecution.
So you'd think that they would argue that
that's why they would just disregard it then, right?
Well, no, they're coming out aggressively attacking this,
threatening them, which has already been done by Bolton
and Pompeo and by everybody else
that is afraid of what this will show.
But Kahn's announcement deepens Israel's isolation
as it presses ahead in Gaza.
And the threat of arrest could make it difficult
for the Israeli leaders to travel abroad.
But what's interesting is
because Palestine,
as I'll show you from their own statement,
which is probably gonna bother Israel too,
that they address it as the state
of Palestine from the ICC is part of the ICC.
That's why this is even happening.
That they are, that they are, that's why they're able
to do this, because Palestine is claiming that this,
so the point is in a weird, backward way
that now puts them at much more risk
to being arrested within Gaza ,
because even though it's all Palestine, right?
What's crazy is that is they're going, well,
we can't arrest them over there in Israel proper.
What are you talking about? It? You get the point.
But it's, it's insulting to see it played that way.
And this all could be a big show to end up going
after just people in Gaza.
I hope not. But it says Betty Gantz, a former military chief
and member of the Israel's war cabinet with Netanyahu
and Gallant harshly criticized Khan's announcement saying,
Israel fights with, guess what?
One of the strictest moral codes.
I mean, they're still really playing this game.
I mean, I have a clip of RFK Jr.
Literally saying that they take more pains than
anyone in the world to stop civilian.
How can you even make that argument with a straight face?
I mean, e even Pierce Morgan took a stand against this guy
and making it look very clearly caught, highlighting
that they did not care about civilian deaths.
And he goes, respect.
So we have strictest moral codes,
respects international law,
and as a robust judiciary capable of investigating itself.
You know why they say that?
Because that's supposed to be the argument.
That's what the US says about why we don't adhere to
what you say, we respect what you do,
but it doesn't apply when they can investigate themselves.
How ridiculous is that?
We're not talking about the idea of the United States
or Israel being able to
investigate crimes within our country.
We're, and, and even more so their own government,
we're talking about the fact that they are the ones
responsible for the crime.
So even whether or not you have a robust judiciary,
if you are in control
of the judiciary, it doesn't make any difference.
And that's what we're talking about.
This is, I mean, even talking about the idea of the, the,
uh, um, gosh, I'm forgetting what the, what the name,
what the general term was, you know, the,
the overhauls they were doing for the government, Israel,
which is one of the reasons why Netanyahu was so,
they were protesting that before episode seventh and even
after the reforms they were talking about, right?
That's exactly the point.
They were trying to change this in a way
that made them less accountable.
That's the whole point. And
so when they say we can investigate ourselves, well, yeah,
that's the whole issue.
And it's the same thing with the US government
and plenty of other Russia, China, it's the same thing.
We, and I, and I'm not even arguing like this is a sticky
conversation because first
and foremost, I do not believe from a general sense of
nation state, we should be held accountable by some
manipulated international entity.
Because, because overall though,
the point is it exists today.
That is where we are. And if they're stepping forward
to call out these crimes,
all I'm talking about is the acknowledgement of this.
And I do wanna see people that commit crimes go to jail.
And if you're in a situation where there is no
accountability, where they are, well,
this seems like the right direction,
but it's a very slippery slope when you understand
how manipulated the ICC is and the ICJ
and the United Nations and how they can be weaponized.
I, I've, like, I've never argued, I have all the answers,
the people that just wanna say
that we can't allow them to do that.
What's your solution then
to stopping people like Netanyahu and Biden?
Oh, you don't have one? Okay. So, so the point is
that there is a situation where we are stuck between this.
And I think that we could understand that in a situation
where we did not, we are not occupied by foreign entities,
then maybe we could have a situation
where we don't need a foreign entity to, you know,
the point is that we are in a really bad way.
We can clearly see that our government is not
what we think it is.
And the same goes for many
other governments around the world.
So we should have these conversations.
We need to flush these things out.
The problem is that we can't,
we start having this conversation,
you get called on American, you get called anti-Semite
to stop that conversation from happening
and to ensure that they maintain the status quo.
It goes on to say, quote, the state of Israel is waging one
of the most, one of the, one of the just wars
waging one of the ju I think it's supposed to say most, one
of the most just wars fought in modern history following a
reprehensible massacre perpetrated
by terrorist Hamas, October 7th.
Just one of the most just wars in history.
As you've killed more people per cap.
I mean, you've broken every single
metric, every single record.
Most journalists, most un members,
most ch I mean everything, but all they do is say Hamas.
And it's supposed to make it all go away,
even though we know as we'll get to now
that they have funded them to make sure that they were there
so they could use them in this exact way.
Now let's watch this clip speaking with CNN, the
ICC Kahan in, in particular, speaking about who he's going
to, you know, uh, who the warrants are for.
I find it interesting that we, they don't even mention
Israel until the latter half of this clip.
- We here at the ICC,
you are today announcing that you are applying
for arrest warrants for top military
and political leadership in the Israel
Gaza War since the October 7th events.
First and foremost, explain to me exactly what you're asking
for and who you are charging
- Today.
Christian, we've applied for warrants
to the pretrial chamber of the International criminal court
in relation to three individuals, uh,
that are Hamas members. Uh,
- Now just stop right there.
Ask, I don't understand, unless this was selectively edited
by CNN, which we should always ask.
She didn't say who on one side.
She said, who are you com issuing warrants for?
And he responds by saying, these three people from Oz.
No, no. About to say the rest. No, just that was it.
So how is that your response?
Wouldn't it be these people and these people?
Like I just found that strange,
and maybe I'm reading too much into it,
but I just, I I can't help
but see the kind of slants like that.
And I find it interesting. She has to chime in
to make him just talk about Israel.
Now, maybe that's just the way they
cut it. That's certainly possible.
- Sua who's in charge on the ground, that's
- Yahi sua, - Absolutely.
Uh, Dave, uh, who's, uh, in charge of the
- Berg, not Dave, like the subtitle show,
but D-E-I-F-I believe it's spelled.
- Uh, and, uh, Haniya, who's, uh, one
of their political bureau based in Doha.
What are the charges?
- The charges, you see? So we're now we're
we're, we're gonna circle back.
She didn't say gimme one side of it, she said,
who are they? I'm that interesting. Our
- Extermination, uh, murder, uh, taking of hostages, uh,
rape and sexual assault, uh, in detention.
- Oh, really? Okay.
So extermination, first of all, where are we talking about?
If we're only talking about October 7th,
which is the only thing that's really on the table right
now, there's no justification for that.
There was an Armed resistance act that is legally protected,
and yes, there were crimes committed,
and we can now prove that at least.
I mean, right now, based on what,
what Zachary Foster PhD argued in regard to the people
that were non-Jews that don't even get discussed in place in
like the Bedwin villages and elsewhere, I believe is
what he said, that were, that were involved in this
and well, with the fact that we can prove 35 different ways
that the IDF shot many of its own people,
whether it was tanks or helicopters or direct IDF attacks.
How do we pretend that this was an act of extermination?
It was very clearly not in any sense of the word.
The only way they make this make sense is
to act like it was a targeted attack against Jews
to wipe them off the map.
Well then explain all the other half of them
that were not Jews at all, that you guys don't talk about,
or the fact that you could prove that many of them,
if not most, were killed by the IDF in response
to them taking living hostages
because they wanted to have an exchange.
I mean, you just, this doesn't add up when you just break
down the basic reality.
If it was about extermination,
why did they take all these hostages?
It's crazy. And then they killed them on the way back. Okay?
That aside, which I'm sure is gonna anger plenty of people
to act like we're just, you know,
whitewashing this while they're ignoring seven months
of ongoing genocide of 50,000 plus people
and 15,000 children.
But that doesn't matter. Apparently all of them matter.
Is the point murder, okay?
Now that, that alone is, I'm, that's very valid.
Not to say that we can prove that.
I don't think we can differentiate right now between those
that were killed by IDF and blamed on Hamas
and those that were killed by Hamas that were there.
But I'm no way would I argue that Hamas was not capable
of killing people out of cold blood.
That will be pretty ridiculous, especially since we know
that Israel funds this group.
So that one very clear taking of hostages absolutely proven,
and it's the only one
that I think was a hundred percent easy to prove
that we could see that they took hostages
that were children, not just hostages,
because realized that this is taking IDF members taking
settlers that are armed in given official capacity,
taking police, taking people
that are legal targets under an armed resistance within an
occupation, according to the fourth Geneva Convention
and international law, which I damn know I damn well know.
He knows that. But then he says,
and this is what makes me very worried about
how clearly dishonest this is going to be sexual assault,
not just rape and sexual assault, specifically in detention.
So now we're pretending that you guys somehow know
and have enough evidence for the argument
that while they were there, they were being assaulted
and sexually abused, despite the 14 different people
that explicitly say the opposite.
All that is based on, as far as I can tell, is
that one woman who spoke to the paper
and said, that's what happened.
Which I don't think I, we can deny that. I don't know.
She's claiming she was, you know,
groped in whatever she said happened, which is horrible.
And that should not be disregarded. We should not pretend.
That doesn't matter. Not rape
was not used in that conversation.
Not once in the article. It would not be hard
to wrap your mind around in a,
a random person on any war in any side,
being in alone in a room with a gun and having control
and taking advantage of the situation.
There's a thousand examples in any war you look at from the
US government and US military, same rife
with examples coming from Israel
and the things they do just in not wartime.
My point though is that we, something
that we absolutely could argue would be a possible,
but to argue that that's worthy of an ICC investigation
to the level of extermination
or murder that you're claiming there was rape
and sexual assault and detention.
While you can prove
for the last 50 years it's been happening in Israeli
prisons that nobody cares about.
That human rights watch and amnesty
and every other group like Beth Selem
and Israeli Human Rights Group have called out
that the UN has called out, did this kind of thing
that makes you frustrated.
And the idea that then are we to pretend
that we're just gonna disregard the clearly false claims
they've been pushing about what happened on October 7th.
He doesn't even mention that.
He says rape and sexual assault in detention,
which explicitly implies not on
October 7th work that one out.
So the point is that clearly we know they've been lying
about what happened October 7th in a thousand different
ways, and all you're doing is shifting it over
to one example of what they claim happened in detention.
Despite, uh, many other examples of them proving that's not
what happened based on their own testimony, I find that
to be pretty hard to disregard.
- Uh, so these are the, the key, uh, crimes that are alleged
to have been committed by these three
individuals, uh, the world,
- But meant by the three individuals.
That's also interesting. I didn't catch that before.
So the ones that were in Qatar,
are we pretending they were directing them via phone
to tell them to sexually abuse people in these rooms?
I mean, that seems very flimsy to me.
I would love to see the
evidence they're talking about. I was
- Shocked on the 7th of October when people were ripped from
their bedrooms, from their homes,
from the different kibbutz, uh, in, uh, Israel.
And, um, people have suffered enormously.
And we have a variety of evidence
to support the applications
that we've submitted to the judges. You
- Have also issued warrants against the top political
and military leadership of the government,
of the state of Israel.
- We've applied for warrants.
Of course, the judges must determine
whether or not to issue them.
But we've applied today, uh, we'll apply for warrants
for Prime Minister, uh, Netanyahu,
and also Minister of Defense gland, um, for the crimes of,
uh, causing, uh, extermination. It's,
- He, it's funny that in my opinion, he didn't wanna say it.
'cause you, that's gonna call cries of Holocaust denialism.
You know what? You can't accuse Jews of that.
That's what it's gonna come back to,
even though no one here is talking about Jews.
We're talking about the crimes of Israel's government
and the crimes of a Hamas political group,
- Um, causing, uh, starvation as a method of war,
including the denial of humanitarian
relief supplies. Mm-Hmm,
- .
So again, he's claiming on the record
that they provably based on the evidence they have,
have been denying food, you know, the exact opposite of
what Elon Levy screams online every day.
The lies we keep getting told,
did they have more food than they have ever had before?
Lie, lie, lie, lie,
- Uh, deliberately targeting civilians in,
in conflict, right?
- It's a big deal. I mean, those are, those are things
that are provable
that has been denied right up to this very moment.
Right? So it's a mixed bag, isn't it?
Either way, if Hamas committed the crimes
and they can prove it, then they should be held accountable.
If Israel committed the crimes
and they can prove it, they should be held accountable.
That's the reality.
Despite all of the lenses that get put over this
to act like we're all, you know, looking only at one side.
The reality is that evidence matters,
not just narrative spun by the group that you like better,
which is what most of these supporters are doing.
Now, what we need to recognize is
that it's not hard to understand.
There's an important overlap about Qatar and Israel
and what we're talking about is in regard to first
and foremost, the funding, which is arming of the,
of the Hamas entity.
That was not about humanitarian aid.
You're dumping billions
of dollars in suitcases into a group's hands in a place
where they have to get aid shipped in.
So the argument, they somehow gave them this money
to buy aid from where
the local store you're shipping it in because it's not there.
That's the whole point. So this is such a flimsy argument.
The point though is that we funded them,
made sure they were in power so
that they could pretend they were the reason
that they didn't want the two state solution,
even though they're the ones that made them there.
So you can't deny all of that.
They've not even a single group in a main conversation from
CNN Fox News that nobody's even dared
to mention this despite it being approval reality.
And I'll show you yet again the clips.
But so as they're talking about the three leaders,
are they the ones that are truly leading Hamas right now,
or has it, are they the ones
that are still protected in Qatar
because they're the ones
that are completely in bed with the Israeli government?
That's my opinion. I think a lot of evidence backs that up,
but I think what we're seeing is a shift over the years into
what has been become the people that have been attacked,
lost their family, been called terrorists that have grown up
and become a part of the group that they want to change,
they want to use to resist what else?
There's no else they can go.
And over the years that has
fundamentally changed the dynamic.
I mean, this is why I think we see from 2000, what is it,
16 four, the, the charter changes
and they make it clear they're going after Zionism.
I think something, something shifted,
it doesn't mean there's not still people within it
that are potentially influenced by Israel
or that are capable of committing crimes.
None of that's what I'm saying.
But what's important to see is
that this is something we can prove.
This is from November, I've made this point many times.
This is from 2023.
Will Mossad be allowed
to assassinate Hamas leaders in Qatar?
It says Israeli sources state that the promise of Qatar
as a haven may be true.
Mm-Hmm, . But that doesn't mean they're free.
So this is a very desperate, I think, effort to try
to make it so, first of all, yes, the promise
that I showed you in the beginning
of this at like the first week
after October 7th, that Netanyahu made it clear,
I'm not gonna go after the people in Qatar.
He said that publicly a promise that Qatar was a haven,
a haven for the leaders of the group
that you claim you wanna exterminate just like
every other narrative.
That doesn't make sense
unless you acknowledge
that they're working with these groups.
The point though is that this is where, uh, Swar
is, this is where he basically on the record.
Oh, that's right. The other, uh, link I had the, anyway,
the picture I brought up earlier, Israel has failed
to track down ssir.
One of the people they're claiming, they're investigating,
and it's military chief Dife, two
of the ones they mentioned likely.
And it says, uh, despite taking all parts of Gaza
where they likely resided until recently,
where are they in Qatar?
That's what they're talking about in this article
that they have fled to Cutter.
Okay? The point is that this is known to them
and that's why they're saying, well, the promise
that we're cutter is a safe haven.
They live in shocking wealth in cutter.
As they point to them when they want 'em
to say the narratives that they want them to say, I, I,
this is what we keep, there's like one main channel, MER,
whatever that channel is, that every time they need it,
they go, look at what they're saying,
we wanna kill all the children,
or we wanna hate all the Jews, whatever they keep saying,
and they go, that's what they all think.
And that's literally not what's being
said over in pa in Gaza.
How do we not piece that together?
There's clearly an issue there.
Now, it could just be that they've devi, there's a deviation
between them, but I think it's more obvious
as we get into the evidence that this is a group
that is influenced still
and they're maintaining their control over these leaders.
So they can always continue to maintain the illusion of
what, what Hamas was or what they wanted it to be.
Here's another example. Here is the other one.
This is, uh, the other one they referenced. Isal, uh, Hanya.
He has been based in Qatar since 2017
where he maintains a luxurious lifestyle.
So again, you're gonna protect that.
You're gonna allow that to be a safe haven for the group
that you cl I mean, how does it make sense?
So this is like pretending that US is allowing o Solomon
Laden or the ISIS leadership or all whatever the group they
otherwise have created, and we've talked about plenty
of times and allowed them to live in sanctuary in Turkey
or even more so like, like Britain.
They live in some fancy offices
and every occasionally we point to them and,
but we, we can't get 'em.
It's insulting to your intelligence.
Oh, that's where that went. Here is France 24 highlighting
dife, same point perspective of Gaza residents.
So even in Gaza, and this is my point, they accuse him
of leaving leading amass from a luxury hotel and Qatar.
So you can see that there are people on the ground
who don't see this person as somebody worthy of respect
as somebody that's living in luxury
that I argue supported by Israel.
And I think that's become a common understanding.
Oh, the same. Oh no, different one. Oh, same point.
So the point is, each one of these are highlighting all
of the leadership and how they are sitting
in their sleek offices in Qatar.
I mean, this is, these are, this is from October 14th,
this is after October 7th.
Clearly they're not there based on Israeli media,
based on Australian media, based on US media,
based on freight media, everything.
So let's go back to the point.
If you're pretending that they're sanctioned by the
or, they're gonna get investigated by the ICC.
Does that mean that you're going
after the group that you can prove are guilty
because Israel's gonna make that happen?
Or, which is probably where that seems to be going?
Or it hopefully,
which I don't think is the case unfortunately.
Is this the ICC making a correct assessment
and saying, well, they did commit crimes
and these three leaders were involved
with the worst part of October 7th.
But guess what? We break down the investigation
that they're actually put to the test
or put to the task by Israel, something
to consider hopeful, but I don't think it'll happen.
Now don't forget, by the way, for those
that haven't seen it, Hamas, the group we're talking about,
these very people that they're screeching about being the
worst thing alive was funded by Israel.
If that doesn't matter to you,
then you're not an honest person. So
- Are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
- Yeah, sure. He deliberately
and systematically even, even told on record, whoever wants
to avoid the threat of a two state solution has
to support my policy
of paying protection money to the Hamas.
So what we did, uh, with the permission
of our prime Minister is to let
Qatar, to transfer a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1.4 billion
by doing it, we increased the power of Hamas.
We did everything in order to make sure
that Hamas will go on controlling Gaza
and Palestinian authority will control the West Bank,
so they will fight each other.
- Netanyahu maintains the Qatar money was
to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe.
Having helped to build up Hamas.
Netanyahu has now vowed to destroy it.
Ridiculous, ridiculous. She fed the beast.
- And it ex the point is
that the argument being it was somehow about humanitarian
aid, and I made the point, it's ridiculous.
And so again, this is not just his rival a Barack, right?
Hussein? No. This is also
what, what that was the, what is it?
The leader of the former head of Shin bet like the FBI.
I mean, these are not random anomalies guys.
These are leading people invo involved with all of this
that are telling you that that's the reality.
And here's a statement from Hartz quoted from 2019
in his LAC co party.
Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment
of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas in
transferring money to Hamas.
This is part of our strategy.
And in fact, there's another statement to that.
Oh, of course, I forgot about that since I opened it.
I'll grab it real quick. Where there's another, a follow up
that goes on to make it even more clear.
In that article, which is quoted from Hartz,
uh, it says, yeah, so very clearly it says this, so anyone
who wants to thwart says it right there has
to support funding them, which is,
it's, that's arming them guys.
You're giving them money in order to,
to seek out whatever they want.
What do you think they're gonna grab?
It says quote, this is part of our strategy
to isolate the Palestinians
and the Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.
That's as simple as against divide and conquer.
You're funding the terrorist group
that you want to be a terrorist group.
So you could point at it and say, terrorist group,
that's why we can't support them.
It doesn't get any more simple than that.
Then this one's very clear as well. This is from 2020.
Mossad chief visited Qatar, you know, the protected place
where they keep those people to continue.
Hamas financial aid, financial aid, Israel visited
by Vidor Lieberman who says, Maad chief
and Israeli military commander were sent
to the mission by Netanyahu.
There, it takes a spec, kind of willful ignorance to avoid
what you're seeing here now.
Well, you can listen to this for yourself.
This is just Khan's nine minute
breakdown of what they're doing.
What I'll show you is basically just what they showed here.
This is the statement of the ICC prosecutor applications
for arrest warrants in the situation in the state
of Palestine.
That's a win in and of itself right there, quite frankly.
But here's what it says On the basis of evidence collected
and examined by my office, I have reasonable grounds
to believe, and he goes on the list of three Hamas leaders,
the ones comfortably held in cutter by Israel's government,
in my opinion, extermination.
And this is what he is, you know, saying they're guilty
of extermination is a crime of a crime against humanity.
I really would like to see where they're arguing at.
If it's just October 7th,
I don't know how you think that makes sense.
Murder as a crime against humanity, contrary to article
as a war crime taking hostages as a war crime.
Now, that one you could argue in, in certain examples,
but if they're just gonna say every hostage they
took, it's, that's not the case.
Many of them were military members,
and I know they know that the reality
of international law is in armed resistance.
This is what we're talking about. We're talking about POWs.
As much as that won't make people happy, many of the,
even the women that they highlight,
the one being taken on the back of a motorcycle that wasn't,
she was literally a member of the IDF.
So they just, it's just about trying
to manipulate the average person.
Now it says rape and other sexual violence
is crimes against humanity.
Again, there's zero proof to that.
They just keep saying the arguments
and we've, I mean, it's not only is there no proof,
they've been caught more time in, let's put it this way,
the vast majority of times they've spoken about this,
they've later been shown to be what to what they said
to be provably false.
Caught in a huge lie,
and I'll play one in a second from Biden, uh, yet again,
coming out like the 40 headed babies
and claiming he saw something
that we can prove doesn't exist torture.
I, I don't, I'd like to see what they're referencing.
Are we, I mean, where's the torture we're talking about?
Wouldn't surprise me. I have no way we would
argue that they're not capable of that.
But at the same time, we can see torture taking place in
Gaza or in the prisons where they held children in Israel.
Other inhumane acts, crimes against humanity.
I don't even know what that means. Cruel treatment
and outrage upon personal dignity.
Sure. Then down here they go off about
Netanyahu and Gallant, that's it.
Three on that side too on this side.
And they simply go over starvation willfully causing great
suffering, willful killing, intentional direct acts,
civilian population, extermination and or murder.
Contrary to these articles, per persecution is a crime
of human, a crime against humanity.
Other inhumane acts, not genocide,
but all these things they're committing,
which they're angry about.
So Israel is lashing out against the group,
and so apparently is, is groups and,
and parts of the Hamas organization,
which I think is interesting
because they're getting it from both sides, right?
Because you know, and honestly, that's
what happens when you try to hit it right down the middle
instead of just being objective
and highlighting what you can see.
But here's what the chairman
of the Euro med human rights group had to say.
The arrest warrants at the ICC intends to issue against
the Israel occupation leaders are a small step in the road,
but they were written with a colonial mindset employing
double standards and by corrupt basis, biased hands
that lack true justice.
Sadly, I agree with that.
I hope, I'm hopeful it'll go the right direction,
but I, you can already see, like I already pointed out ways.
This is more about pation, creating the illusion
of accountability while maintaining the same thing.
We're all trying to stop. That's the real point.
Pardon me? I need to clear my throat.
Trying to do it off, off, off the microphone along. Ms.
Rahi points out something interesting here as well.
He says, and this is the about historically highlighting
what kahan has been incapable it seems of doing.
He goes, so sleeping beauty,
Kareem Kahan has woken up from his decades long slumber.
Now, isn't that just outstanding?
He goes, and this not like it should matter in, in many
of these contexts, but he's an Israeli Jew
and he says, as we have been fed tons of misinformation,
propaganda and psychological warfare in this genocide,
here are some things to note.
A this happens the day
after the Irani president Iranian
president's helicopter crash.
It could be a coincidence as are all things in the world
of international politics.
It could be powers that be, that had enough of Netanyahu
and see this as a red line crossed,
or it could be something else entirely a coordinated effort
to divert our attention
and give us the false hope that something is about
to be done at the service of future escalation
and more atrocities.
We don't know, but experience says we need to be skeptical.
That's the most logical thing you can say right now.
B, we have no idea how long this is going to take.
And real quickly back to that, like this is
what you'll get from the people calling us conspiracy
theorists or secret Jew haters,
blindly taking at face value exactly what the US
and Israel are saying, it's happening despite their record
of lying over and over about what's going on.
Now, I'm not dismissing what they're saying.
I I we're questioning everything of all sides.
That's the same thing we said about the Hamas allegation,
about the recent, uh, bombing of that location.
What did I say? We should not blindly take at face value
anything either side is saying we should consider
all possibilities question all of them.
But of course that doesn't sound right when you're
saying he secretly it's you.
So you have to make it into, I blindly trust one side
to ignore the other because that's what they do in reverse.
Every accusation is, is a mission, right?
But it goes on to say as a reluctance, you know, we also,
he says, don't know what happened in the meantime.
Oh, so I restart the statement.
He goes, we don't, we have no idea how long this will take.
And that's the point about allowing the genocide
to continue under the at least possibility
of accountability, which worries me,
obviously, excuse me.
And it says, we also don't know
what will happen in the meantime, as a reluctance,
reluctant conspiracy theorist, I will not rule out
that this was done on purpose to bolster claims
of antisemitism
and allow American lawmakers to reassert their dedication
to Zionism, up to
and including going to war with Iran, the source
of all evil, yada yada yada.
What he's saying is essentially creating, like we talk about
what Zionism is desperate to create the illusion of,
to justify its presence, pointing at the IC
and going, see, we told you everybody hates the Jews,
even though we're not talking about the Jews,
we're talking about Zionism and the crimes of a government,
but to them it's synonymous.
Even their laws they're passing now
because that's the only way they
can maintain control of this.
C the timing of this is very unusual, not only in relation
to the president of Iran, but also as regards to genocide.
This looks impressive, but does not,
but does nothing to stop the action.
'cause even if they accuse them and it comes to pass,
there's no actual mechanism to stop them.
He says, could this be a way of buying time for Israel
to complete the destruction
of Gaza while we're a promised justice
that in reality will never be allowed to be seen.
He says, I trust no words only actions,
which is kind of where we all should be.
And one thing is clear to me.
He says, this is going to send the American political system
into a spiral of violent, racist hygienic.
He, uh, he uh, hegemonic insanity, inanity.
I dunno if you meant inanity, like inane
or insanity either way.
The point is that I, I see it coming too.
It's already happening. People like Stef
and Tom Cotton recruits, they're all gonna scream
that th stand with Israel and this is racist
and antisemitic and this is coming from the hatred.
That's where it's all gonna be. It's already happening
despite all the evidence we have.
That's undeniable. He says, those
who initiated this step must know this.
So my best guess he says is Russia,
China, which would make sense.
Destabilization trying to spin these government,
spin them into, you know, basically trying, I mean, look,
this is the same point we make all the time.
What they're highlighting is something we should care about
if that's what's happening, right?
We should care that our government is blindly interest
of a foreign entity at your expense.
But on the same time, it benefits Russia
and China to create that problem to show the American people
that their government's not in their interest.
Now, is that in our interest, in their mind,
or maybe not, maybe,
maybe in their mind it's about creating the divide
to then circumvent that, you know,
step in and cause even more disabled.
We should be concerned about that.
Like there's an element of
that coming from the two party paradigm
that is we should worry about them ex exacerbating the
divide for their benefit
that will only make our situation worse.
But that does not mean you should
ignore what they're pointing to.
That's both sides playing you.
We should acknowledge that they're highlighting if this is
them doing this, the reality
or government is not fighting for you,
and then also be on guard
to other foreign entities trying to take advantage of that.
I know logic, it sounds so crazy today, right?
But it says, as I said yesterday,
he writes about the Iranian president's death.
This is the buildup to the big clash
between global south and west.
Finally, he says, Hamas has made the prime minister over
Israel and international criminal,
and this is a historic and strategic achievement.
It really is. Israel's isolation is reaching
meaningful, tangible landmarks.
This is the point. You just
can't come back from what they've done.
Now, Ali Abu ma from uh,
electronic hit Ada highlights what they said.
You can read it for yourself. This is their link simply
saying, quote, Hamas stands ready to appear
before the ICC, which I find fascinating.
The idea that the, this is like, this is in the minds
of people seeing them for what they call them.
This would be the equivalent of ISIS going, we stand ready
to present ourselves in front of the ICC.
Like, does that sound like it makes sense to anybody?
They, that that, I mean, the reality being is that you,
they would get arrested on the spot most likely,
but maybe that'll, maybe they'll try to do that here.
Probably wouldn't surprise me. But
what I think is interesting is they've said this
before, they're willing to stand, go to the United Nations.
They just don't want that to happen.
Just like you see with, in previous examples in the past
where Iran, like remember the Limpid minds
and, uh, John Bolton
and all that spun up in a, when, when, when,
at the time it was, uh, J Jar Zif, uh, rif, he went
to the un, he was there ready to present the evidence
to prove they were lying and they wouldn't even let him in.
That's how that works, while screaming about how bad he is
and the, anyway, that's this is, these are criminals.
So the point is that they stand ready
to appear before the ICC.
Now they could be lying too, but it says with witnesses
and live testimony and to,
and bear the burden of any judicial finding against it
or its members after a full
and fair trial with rules of evidence.
So there, he's basically saying
that we'll act if we get ruled against us, we'll stand by
that we'll be held accountable.
I mean, even if they're lying,
when's the last time you heard the US
or Israel ever say something like that?
I found that to be pretty powerful.
And it's not to say support Hamas or anything like that.
It's just simply acknowledging that
what they said is interesting
and it could just be a very well-played dynamic like I
highlight with Russia and anybody else
seemingly just playing the good guy in the con in contrast
to what the US is clearly doing doesn't mean
that they are the good guy and who knows?
It could be. I just, I don't think in those terms.
I, I think all governments are problematic,
but my point is that playing
that role right now is obviously advantageous for them.
So what we always have to consider
that it's like politicians
and media right now suddenly calling out Israel.
Do they really care? I don't think so,
but they see the opportunity.
Now, a Ali also points out in regard to what the,
what Khanh said here, the charges
of rape against Tomas leaders are baseless
and shows that Khan is engaging in cynical politics
to try to soften the blow.
Exactly. That's the lightest way you could see this,
in my opinion, they'll soften the blow of the real
and serious charges against Israel's genocidal leaders.
So basically saying that he's just trying to, like I said,
that's what I meant when I said kind of playing it even well
two, you know, one for them, one for them.
I don't, I think it's worse than that.
What he's saying would mean
that ultimately they will ultimately hold them accountable
and this is just a way to kind of soften that blow.
I hope he's right. Frankly, I kind
of feel like that's not gonna be the case.
I frankly, I kind of end up seeing this as
the illusion of accountability.
I know I'm a cynic it comes to this stuff,
but I I I hope I'm wrong Now.
Here's what Israel cats had to say,
and this is where we get into the responses to all this,
and can you guess where it goes?
Can you guess? I'm sure you could
take, I'll give you three guesses.
You're only gonna need one. It says the outrageous decision
by the prosecutor of the ICC
and the Hague is an unrestrained frontal assault on the
victim victims of October 7th and are 128 hostage in Gaza.
I don't see why you're going
after the people that they claim did that.
Is it only because they're also holding you accountable?
Like, I don't even know how you could make that statement.
How is it a, a unrestrained frontal assault on the victims
if they're going after the people
that you think are responsible?
You see my point? Like it's obviously the only thing you can
say because they're also accusing you
of the crimes you're committing.
But he goes on to say, while Hamas murders, rapists,
murderers and rapists,
which clearly the rape allegation is the best they can do
right now, because there's, they're trying
to use atrocity propaganda even though they're failing,
but they say commit crimes against humanity,
against our brothers and sisters.
The prosecutor mentions in the same breath,
the prime minister basically gallant and gallant and,
and Netanyahu alongside not see like monsters.
There's your first example who didn't see that coming,
a historical disgrace that will be remembered forever,
which quite frankly, I kind of feel as a threat.
I feel like that's, they keep, they've heard
that's used many times recently that like it suggests that,
you know, they're, that's not gonna stand in any case, Nazi.
Like, I just think that's such a ridiculous overlap.
The group that, so a group that is in no shape, way, shape
or form, whether it's ideological, whether it's visibly,
whether it's anything is even remotely like the Nazi era
timeframe, you know, aside from the, you know, in contrast
to the Zionist connection on record to the actual Nazi party
or the idea of Zionism itself
and overlap with lots of authoritarianism
or the attack of Jews themselves
to justify their own existence, which plenty
of people like Avi Shalom and other experts talk about.
No, those are all racist comments,
even though we can prove them all right?
The point is that Nazi like is a way
to create the illusion that this the only
and only bad guy in the conversation
and to compare the people committing genocide
because of who these people are in Gaza
to the other bad Nazis.
To try and make it sound like
only one side is a problem here.
Like, think about how insulting that is.
Even if you think Hamas is the worst thing in the world,
you are committed genocide, the world sees it,
you're not putting that away.
It says, I have instructed the immediate establishment
of a special command center.
Here we go with all at the foreign ministry,
with all professional entities aimed at fighting against the
decision intended primarily to shackle Israel's hands
and prevented from exercising its right to self-defense.
Now that we're seven months away from that.
I made this argument when we first
started this in the first week.
How long will this still be self-defense if this
goes on for four years?
Are you gonna still be arguing at self-defense?
I promise you they would. It's insulting
and what you're saying is shackle your hands.
So all you're really saying is they're trying
to stop us from finishing the job.
It goes, I intend to speak with foreign ministers
of leading countries around the world to urge them.
I would read threaten insinuate, you know,
to use our control mechanisms to force them to do
what we want to oppose the prosecutor's decision
and declare that even if warrants are issued,
they do not intend to enforce them.
That's being scared and they've already admitted that
they've, there are sources that spoke with harass in times
of Israel admitting that inside their own circle
that Netanyahu
and the rest were fearful of how this would go out.
Because if they then wanna fly to the United States
where they're desperately need to continue
to propagandize everybody, they can get arrested
and it wouldn't even have to be because of the US
and any other entity could do so that scares them.
That's what he's saying. They're trying to get their oath
so they will not arrest them even though there's an
international warrant for them.
It says no power in the world prevent us from bringing
back all our hostages.
The course. 'cause that's what you're doing, despite
that the the bombing actions you're taking are killing them.
It's just so insulting. Nobody believed that.
Not even Israelis believe that anymore.
I'll get, I was going and do that again today, but I won't.
There's, I'm almo where we're at in time.
Yeah, it's a good call. It's almost two and a half hours.
I will go over it again. It's the same points we make,
but there's new information around it
that right now in Israel, they just had a massive,
to me it looks like a hundred thousand people,
if not way more than that,
which is the picture I could see marching calling for them
to take the deal that Gaza, that Hamas is offering.
You're not gonna hear that in the United States
because they'll desperately hide it from you.
How do you make sense of that? Again, I do not believe most
of those people care about the people in Gaza,
but they do care about their families
and that other people around them are beginning to recognize
that Israel doesn't either.
And so they're going bring them home, take the deal
and then go back to it.
But they're not, because I
don't believe they want them back.
I think they have been killing them
systematically from the very beginning.
And we'll go over the Shaw, Luke, uh, story again.
When we go over next, where the story's
already changed for the fourth time.
Remember when they said that the, they found a bone
and their hair, she was decapitated.
That was all from the president of Israel.
That changed three or four times.
Now, apparently they found her body, it's completely intact.
At least that's the story.
I mean, I, I hope the family got her body back.
But remember how that actually went?
She was taken to a hospital that was confirmed by Newsweek
and her family that kind
of destroys the whole narrative of what they claimed happened.
Then that hospital where she was, was bombed and destroyed
and she was likely killed there.
I don't know how we ignore that, 'cause I proved
that on the show, but, you know, whatever.
Here's what Lapid said.
Yeah, you're lapid the ICC arrest warrants. Alright?
Complete moral failure.
So, arrest warrants or people committing crimes are a moral
failure if it's about Israel.
Got it? It says, we cannot accept the outrageous comparison
between Netanyahu and Sindar, between the leaders of Israel
and the leaders of Hamas.
You know, the group that you're funding
and put in position, this is unjustified, right?
Or the fact that Netanyahu has committed far, far,
far more crimes than verifiably.
Even if everything they've ever said about Hamas is true.
That's still the case. That's gonna bother
people, but it's a fact.
And on top of that, just since
October 7th, you can prove that.
Yeah. Wait, you know what, what gun used to say
before he went crazy and
or exposed that he was always crazy.
Facts. Don't care about your feelings. .
He doesn't think that anymore. Apparently Elizabeth Hagedorn
points out something interesting,
and this is Biden, uh,
blink In's response of the US government.
He says, the US fundamentally rejects the ICC prosecutor's
request for Netanyahu and Gallant arrest warrants.
Quote, we reject the prosecutor's
equivalence of Israel Temas.
That's what they keep highlighting. You know why?
Because they don't wanna be on record claiming
that they're not committing crimes.
I think, I think they're so worried about
where this ultimately goes, that they're taking legal a
they're, they're consulting counsel
before they respond to, all you're saying is, we don't like
that you compared 'em to the bad guys.
It's not really a real response.
Now, here's where you get into the ones
you'd expect more than anything.
This was the one guest you didn't need.
There is a vile global campaign.
Elon Levy says, you know, the unemployed X flyer on Twitter,
who's still a liar on Twitter,
but just doesn't have his own accord.
He says to cast the Jewish state.
No one's talking about that as the new Nazi Germany.
Well, no one said that either actually.
Weird that you're projecting so much, right?
And who, where does anybody, the only one
that mentioned Nazis is when you guys
talk about the other side.
So, what's, or,
or rather people protesting who al make those arguments
because it's an over a, a verifiable historical connection
that you guys don't want to talk about.
Which by the way, is un easily,
you could look it up on Wikipedia.
Grab that for you. And this one
too, the two that I tend to show you,
just 'cause it's easy to verify.
Take you two seconds. This show we did Zionism versus Nazim
and all the source material, you can look for yourself
and this's, not some random blog.
We're talking about doc historical documents from the CIA,
from Mosad themselves, from the Israeli government,
from Harts, from times of Israel,
like undeniable realities, human rights groups.
Or the fact that Dan Cohen highlights, according
to Israel's Harts, that they continue to ally
with Nazi Germany, even after the final solution.
Work that out in your mind and make sense of the story.
They were told about how the, the creation of Israel was
to fight the thing that we're pointing to,
even though they were working with Nazi Germany.
While that was going on, it's easy to guys,
this is provable documentary documented history.
So the point is, you are calling them,
you are claiming people that are accusing you of genocide
or framing you as the new Nazi Germany.
Like I, this is why I point out how bad they are at this.
Like, I don't think they recognize how bad like this,
you're exposing the, this is the projection.
This is like the accusing them of
that which you are guilty kind of game.
No one made that point, man.
Not in this conversation, not the ICC, not,
but you made it clear as a means
of pursuing its ultimate destruction.
So jump in the show.
So bluntly, you're calling them Nazis
and you're saying that it's only about
destroying the Jewish state.
No one's trying to do that in this conversation.
They're trying to hold two
people in your government accountable.
And you turn that into calling us
Nazis and destroying all of Jewish.
I mean, that's, it's laughably stupid.
He says, today the ICC prosecutor decided to lend its hand
to this effort, which only serves those who want
to finish the Nazis job.
So again, all the way back to the idea
that we're now pretending that anybody doing any
of this is just hating Jewish people
and trying to destroy them like the Nazis did.
The only thing they got in reality,
we're talking about an international body who has a mountain
of evidence, who is even going out to the other side
as well, and is claiming two of them are guilty of crimes.
But to him, that's Nazis destroying
everything in all the Jewish people.
They're ridiculous. These are clowns today.
And I think most people recognize that.
And of course, Zane points out, I wonder
how they came to that conclusion.
Remember this, Glen, we are fighting human animals
and we are acting accordingly.
All these are verifiable, easy to look up the,
and this is Ben Gavir.
The only thing that should enter Gaza, as long
as some host doesn't release the hostage is a not a a
gram of humanitarian aid.
Yeah, crime. No matter
what you think about a moss, that's a crime.
All of these are crimes. Here is, uh, what was he again?
Major general Aileen, Alan.
Human shields must be treated as such.
You wanted hell, you're gonna get hell.
Hu excuse me, human shields, human animals.
He said, and he's talking about Palestinians.
On and on and on. Here is Hagar.
The emphasis is on damage, not accuracy.
That was a clumsy statement right in the beginning
that proved that they were not trying to be accurate,
but they just, they they think we're that stupid.
We're just gonna not remember that you said that Lapid,
and I've shown you that one many times if international
media is objective, is objective
and shows both sides, it serves Hamas.
So if we show all sides, including what you're doing,
it's in the interest of Hamas.
That's what he said. Ben said, the children
of Gaza have brought this upon themselves.
That's real statements guy.
These are genocidal, maniacal statements.
Netanya will turn Gaza into a desert island. Herzog.
It is not true. This rhetoric about civilians not being
aware, not involved,
it's absolutely not true , it's just grotesque.
I'm very puzzled. The last one says, concerned
with the word is showing
for the Palestinian people, the world.
I'm very puzzled with the constant concern the world is
showing Palestinian people
and is actually showing for these horrible
inhuman AM animals.
He's not talking about Hamas.
He's showing you what they really think. Unreal.
Now, oh, let me add these for you so you don't lose them.
Make sure you watch this. It's an important show.
I think, and Dan Cohen's
been doing some great work on this as well.
Here's Caroline Glick, making it just
as clumsily obvious as possible.
The ICC apparently is now a neo-Nazi institution.
neo-Nazi institution.
So because Elon claims you're, he's accusing them, you
of being Nazis, you're, you're jump is
to say they're now Nazis.
It's just childishly stupid. I mean, why?
What's the, or just say that they're crim.
Say that they're liars. This clumsy use of anti-Semitic
and Nazi against anybody they don't like is sad.
It's really sad. And that's where this comes into play.
I, I put that, you know, pretty shoddily actually.
But , I made that not too long ago just
because it's exactly what's happening.
We don't remember the classic for the
podcast, the golden book.
Everyone I don't like is Hamas a child's guide
to online political discussion.
That's what we're dealing with. A neo-Nazi institution.
Now, on top of that, the crazy part about this is to say
that they're like the, the argument simply being
that they hate Jewish people.
They're neo-Nazis
because they are going after the criminals.
Now, o but not just one-sided,
but anytime you're going
after the Israeli government, even if
you're also going after Hamas.
So how is it a neo-Nazi institution if
they're going after both of them?
Think about it for a second. Or how is,
is it only hating Jews if you're going after Hamas as well?
Is that Aloy? Are you lying about that? It's just so clumsy.
It says both the fake court
and its genocide enabling employees.
Now everyone there works there too, should be treated
accordingly by all people of good faith.
What does that mean accordingly?
Genocide enabling employees should be treating accordingly.
Are you saying they should be committing
genocide against them and their families?
She says they should be denied visas.
Their assets should be frozen. Wow.
And they should be prosecuted
for providing material aid to Nazis.
Oh God, these people are so dangerously irresponsible.
It's just desperation guys.
These are people that have, this is the senior contributing
editor at the, what is it?
The Jewish news syndicate. They have been doing
so much complicit actions for genocide.
The, i I think these people are genuinely trying to,
I mean, they see it.
They know they've lost control.
This is screeching about Nazis
and antisemitism in a case
where you're literally calling out the, the employees
of people who work there
and saying, we should freeze their assets,
prosecute them from material aid to Nazis.
You mean like Zionism work?
I mean, it's just so crazy to me.
It falls on deaf ears, guys,
because it's baseless is the best way to put it.
So where's the evidence? They're neo-Nazis.
Now, are you just simply calling anyone a Nazi that doesn't
say the thing you think is what's going on?
David Collier, same old, same old.
Not for the first time in history.
A court based in Europe is trying to issue warrants
for the arrest of Jews based on false trumped up charges.
Okay, so now it's only about the Jewish people.
I thought it was about
Zionism and the acts of the government.
They're committing against people in Palestine.
Oh, I forget it's only about Jewish people.
'cause that's all you seem to point out according
to the ICC, the Jews not Israel
or those two people had to lie back
and let Hamas slaughter and rape them.
Nobody said that. And again, are you ignoring the other half
of the conversation that weren't Jews?
Yes. It's just insulting to anybody out there that can't see
who recognizes only people that they're pointing
to on October 7th are the Jews that were attacked.
There were a lot of other people that weren't Jewish.
I guess they don't care about those ones.
I simply said, as always, only racist
and Zionists are making this about Judaism.
This is about the verifiable crimes of the government.
You lie for every day. Your desperation is self-evident.
Elon Levy, again, it has been the dream
of every antisemite since the Nuremberg trials
to put Jews back on the dock for the Nazis crimes.
That's not a dream you want to appear in.
Ugh, just, it literally gives me the she the she beebies.
It's just gross. These people are absolutely despicable.
So you're talking about an international body
who is investigating crimes, whether
or not you think they're honest and is accusing people in
the government of crimes and your go-to is the dream
of every antisemite is to charge all Jews
with the Nazis crimes all that time ago.
What does it have to do with anything we're talking about?
The only thing people can connect it to is
that they must be Jew haters
because they're going after Israel.
That's it. It's not, where's the evidence?
Like all you guys are screaming about the evidence
and the provable action, and
yet you keep making out allegations from the state,
like from behind the podium of Israel.
They have nothing to back it up.
That's why people see through it. A soft MD highlights.
I don't understand. Did yo did Ga glance say we are imposing
a complete siege on Gaza.
No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel.
Everything is closed. We are fighting human
animals and we are acting accordingly.
Yes or no? That'll clear things up quickly.
Of course you won't answer that.
Now, this is in a recent discussion,
and this comes off the same point about how Biden himself
has started to parrot things that we've seen before.
Like there's no place in the world
that Jews are safe without Israel.
And Sam Husseini being one
of the only brave people in the room, say for a few others
who ask the right questions.
Right? So we're coming off the i the idea,
the lie about one side being something.
I mean, the bottom line being that they're trying
to hide accountability,
not even ju even just the the exercise
and let's just say it doesn't
come to pass where they go to jail.
Just the exercise of putting this out there, they know
because they've already lost,
is only gonna make this much more likely that they will go
to jail in other circumstances.
So what Sam Husseini is highlighting is
that the US government is absolutely
irrevocably at this point on the wrong side of his history.
And he's talking about the fact that Biden is saying things
that are directly undermining the reality
of our constitutional rights
and what we pretend this country is, doesn't
that bother Republicans or Democrats, people that care,
or I mean that Of course it should.
And I think most people are seeing this now.
So what I wrote is the Patel's response
to this was pathetic, very revealing.
It was mumbling and stuttering.
And you can tell that he was caught off guard.
And is this, and as I said,
just typically cowardly fashion is
ignoring the obvious point.
And he knows it. There are US government representatives,
and they are clearly Israel first, like Brian Mast
for example, who actively makes that clear every single day,
only caring about Israeli Americans, for example,
despite the fact that there's still over 600 American
Palestinians who are in Gaza.
But he never seems to care about them.
- And has recently said.
And he said many times, um, uh, in the last year
or so, quote, were there, no Israel,
there wouldn't be a Jew in the world that is safe.
Isn't that both false
and antithetical to the First Amendment, Jews, Muslims,
Christians, atheists, whoever are safe in the United States
because of the First Amendment,
because of the nature of US society. How
- Can now you agree with that or not is not the point.
The point is to put that on them.
And that's what they would argue, right?
And the idea being that that puts them in a position
to either say, well, yes, clearly it's safe
for Jews in this country, which if they say no,
that's pretty crazy, right?
Because it's not the case.
It's obviously safe for any as, as much as it's safe
for anybody else, it is safe
for Jews in this country. Here's how I respond.
- And this administration stand behind a a remark like that,
particularly about a foreign power
that itself stands accused of not only genocide,
but being an apartheid regime, right?
Isn't that statement where there no, Israel,
there wouldn't be a Jew in the world that is safe
antithetical to the first amendment and false.
- Uh, I don't have, I'm not sure which, uh, uh,
these comments from the president you're referring to, but I
- What you you mean the one he just read for you?
So we need to know the location of the time it was said
for you to understand what he's saying.
Like obviously he knows this was said.
It's a very public clear statement
that people have been saying repeatedly.
That's the best you got.
I, I don't know which one you're talking about.
The one I just effing said, man, .
It's just pathetic. They're,
they've lost their ability to do, you know what it is?
Even the ones that are good at this are in such a
detrimental position.
There's just no way you can respond to these things
because they know they've lost.
They know the world sees right through it.
And even worse, they know the world now sees them
that the US government is not doing what it pretends to do.
You don't have this moral high ground anymore. Ho thank God.
And it's not about destroying the US
country, the American country.
It's about highlighting that your government is doing that
and we're trying to save it.
But he drowns in this response.
- I have no, uh, issuer, which, uh, uh,
these comments from the president you're referring to,
but I have no, uh, issue or
or reason with the way that those, uh, with how, with
what the, the president said. And I think,
- My God, that was bad.
I have no reason with the how the, with what he said.
He's saying that he doesn't mind it. He's okay with it.
He agrees with it. However you wanna take that.
- I think what we are talking about historically, uh,
since the founding of the, um, state of Israel
as a a Jewish state is a, I'm sure
what the president was referring to. Of course.
- What does that mean? No, he wasn't, he's saying
that nowhere in the world is safe
for a Jew other than Israel.
That's, that's sadly false. He's lying right there.
He is not saying that. And the point on top of that is
what you're discussing is ignoring the
entire history around that.
But of course he's not gonna get into that. Uh, we
- Have freedoms within our own country, uh, under, uh,
the, uh, first Amendment.
Um, but I don't have anything else to, to offer on that
- .
Yeah, that was terrible. So yeah, they're right.
But then we have freedom. So everybody who's next?
That's really sad. Well,
- I mean, he said this several, several times.
It wasn't a one off.
He said it when he met Netanyahu at the un, uh,
I think last July or August.
Uh, and he said it since then.
I think he said it once he arrived in Israel.
It's, but, but, but it says in the world, right?
Jews are safe in the United States
and have been safe in the United States way
before Israel existed. Isn't that correct?
- Uh, that is true. Buthuh, you are also,
- Oops.
So right there, you just
contradicted what you said a second ago.
If they're not safe, if what they said you have no problem
with, and that's the case, uh,
yeah, but we have rights over here.
You can't then go. Yes.
So they're old, they have been safe there.
That contradict me. It's a logic contradiction.
But you know, they'll never acknowledge
that this is what they do every day.
- Yeah, I think your comments are, oh,
- This, oh, this - Is important. Isn't,
- I love the way he reacts to this.
Sam really puts him on the side.
I don't think he expected it. And Patel, Patel looks
like scared almost.
- Correct. - Uh, that is true.
Buthuh, you are also, I think your comments are, um,
essentially forgetting to take into account the, uh,
deeply troubling and horrific history.
Excuse me. That the, that the, excuse me,
I I'm talking about this in the
context of the historical context.
- My comments are doing what
- I'm not say Sam, uh, what I'm saying is that you were,
you were, you were taking the president's
comments out of context and
- How exactly, God, this is pathetic.
This is the worst I've ever seen him do. How is that?
I mean, this is, if you were in a real conversation,
okay, how is it outta context?
Gimme that. But they won't,
they'll sidestep and they'll go to somebody else.
They'll box you out if they have to.
It's explicitly stated, it's exactly what he said.
There's no con there's no other context to that.
What he's doing is trying to walk away from his stumbling
into the minefield of pretending Sam Hussein,
he was being irresponsible
or insensitive to the flight of the Jews
or whatever he was trying to say right there.
You know what that translates to? You're an antisemite.
That's what they, that's really what that boiled down to.
And that's why Sam was immediately like,
what are you claiming on saying?
I'm simply highlighting that
what he said is patently false, and we can prove it.
And even you'll say that if pushed,
but you know, that anger is the other side of this.
So you're trying to walk it down the middle like a coward.
That's what he's doing.
- My comments are doing what
- I'm not say Sam, uh, what I'm saying is that you were,
you were, you were taking the
president's comments out of context.
And when it is clear, he's speaking about it in a historical
context, given the very horrific and nope, uh, troubling
and terrible history, uh,
that there has been of the Holocaust.
- He, okay, wait, so the terrible, so you meant,
you said the history and then you referenced one event.
I mean, guys, I mean, this was pathetic.
He, he was immediately pulling on the talking points, uh,
Holocaust, you're, you're, you don't respect the Jews.
Like that's all he did right there.
And your statement didn't even make sense.
If you're pulling on the historical context of the,
you know, the point is that's not even the reality.
It was obviously citing what Netanyahu just said, not 45,
not 75 years ago
or whatever we're talking about here,
the history from then forward,
but the reality that today, which is clearly
what they're saying Biden included,
that there's nowhere else safe in the world
if Israel doesn't exist.
That's, that's the reality. Said
- It over and over again.
- Go ahead, go Two - Questions on India, sir. Please.
- Yeah. God, I guarantee this person
absolutely hates this job, especially today.
Now, here's a good point to counter that with
cuts news network highlights.
Well-known Jewish historian, I think it's Elon, uh,
Elon Poppe or Pop, says that he was detained Monday
in Kaza in Israel in some foreign Jew hating country, no,
in Detroit airport questioned by federal agents.
Why? Because he's an outspoken supporter of Palestine.
And he was asked repeatedly, are you a Hamas supporter?
Do you, do you regard the Israel actions as genocide?
How do you even ask those statements?
Like that's some kind of a legal barrier.
The point I'm making here is that they're trying
to act like Jews are unsafe anywhere in the world
because of the Muslim and Arab
and danger that we're trying to fight against.
We're talking about American police arresting him
for not supporting Israel.
I mean, my God, it's the exact opposite
of what they're trying to highlight.
And he says, who are my a Muslim friends in America?
How long do I know them?
What kind of relationship I've had with them?
That's what they're asking him. That is, I mean, it's,
it's the red scare situation or,
or the, the same thing that's happened 45 times since
where suddenly it's Russia, suddenly it's China.
It's, they just use this to dehumanize and scare people,
and they use the two party screamers to make that happen.
Now, here's, uh, Natali lead propagandist trying
to water that down, saying, you know,
by the way he's saying se uh, Jews
or white supremacists says radicals.
And again, I'm sure people are saying that the argument
is Zionists are whites or rather just racist, right?
I mean, and I don't even need to play all of this,
just the reality that this is, you know,
human rights watch ams, international bet sell,
they're all called an apartheid
state. Why? 'cause you can prove it.
- Uh, Zionism is racism. Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either a racist Jewish state
or it's a democratic state for everybody. And that's what,
- Yeah, Ivy Shalom who goes over the history, the reality
of the, I mean, or even just in the particular point he
makes, is of the nation state law, where they make it clear.
Netanyahu says on the record, it's
for the state for the Jews alone.
Very clear, right?
So the point is that Zionism is an
inherently racist concept.
Zionism is anti-Semitism using the Jewish population
for its benefits at its expense,
just like the American government uses us.
My point though, in this, what we're highlighting
is he's saying that Jews are white supremacists
because that's trying to conflate the conversation.
Now, I guarantee some people are saying that,
but most of what he's highlighting are people saying
that Zionism is, and plenty of the ones saying
that are also Jews.
But here's what he goes. Meanwhile,
Ethiopian Jews are proudly serving in the IDF.
Here's the worst part about this.
I said, well, you might wanna ask Ethiopian Jews in Israel
what they think since they seem to disagree.
And there is an endless amount of information around this.
And I'll show you the ones I linked to right here.
This is 2013 criticism regarding a lack
of integration in Israel.
Many Ethiopian Jews feel as second class citizens.
They still to this day. Why? What do you think?
And, and guys, this is stated publicly by people in Israel.
They are not the same. They're treated as lesser than.
And it's sort of the same conversation we've talked about
in regard to, um, what was it?
Now I remember what I talk, uh, there.
It's CIA documents that highlight the fact that Zionism at,
its, its creation of Israel was on the record.
This is a CIA document, by the way,
which I've grabbed every time I think,
where they were willing to sacrifice the Jews in Arab
nations to get what they wanted.
That's pretty clear. This is from cia.gov,
simply saying very clearly,
the Jewish agency at the time is apparently willing
to sacrifice the Jews residing in Arab countries, right?
So the point I think stands for itself.
So the point here in regard
to Ethiopian Jews is they were used, brought in sort
of like the point we make about Avi Shalom highlighting
what Jews went through in Iraq, where they were just, again,
you could look at some Wikipedia for crying out loud.
They were bombed by Mossad to force them into Israel
to make it as simple as possible,
as more to the, more to the story.
And Ethiopian Jews driven into Israel under the guise
of some better life, were treated as second class citizens
because they were not white.
Here is an article from 2013
Ethiopian women in Israel were given
contraceptive without consent.
Oh, it almost sounds like eugenics. Here's DW from 2018.
Our Ethiopian Jews, Israel's second class citizens.
Well, only if you then argue that Palestinians are third,
fourth, fifth, whatever way down the line
or non-existent on the scale.
But yes, they treat them as lesser than they,
they'll scream at them on the streets.
The settlers will here.
I know Guy Abby Martin has done some scathing work on this,
showing you the, the protest they've had about
how Ethiopian Jews should be in certain area.
Like this is open segregation, racism, guys,
this is from 2024 for Israel.
Black Ethiopian Jews are not Jewish enough here.
Associated press, this is a different story,
but still relevant to what we're talking about.
I just talked about the one where a trans, a, a trans
or trans, is that what you call it?
Somebody, trans trans con a convert, excuse me, transferred
and convert, got mixed up a convert to Judaism.
It's an, it's an Arab man, a Palestinian who trans who,
who became a Jew by religion.
'cause that's the only thing that,
that's the only thing we're talking about here.
Not there is Israelis.
And there's the real religion of Judaism.
The point is, he converted to Judaism,
not this story, but the other one.
And it was pretty well known in fact,
and got shot at a crossing simply
because he didn't, the guy didn't believe him.
So what does that show you? First of all, that you get shot
because you're not a Jew on
top of that, that it didn't even matter.
It simply because I think that speaks for itself.
Here's a new example. This is from May 16th.
Four days ago, Palestinian converted the Judaism,
an Israeli soldier saw him as a threat and open fire.
Now, oh, here we go. There we go.
Now, one quick point back to the argument
of the responses to the ICC.
Here's Rick Scott, Florida Senator.
He says, while Israel delivers aid,
nope, that's proably false.
In fact, like it, well, here's the craziest part.
The iccs own investigation said they proved they're delaying
it and stopping it, and that's why they're calling them out.
And yet Rick Scott's argument is, well,
they're delivering aid protecting civilians, all
of which they said they're not doing.
By the way, Hamas terrorists take hostages
and use children as shields and hospitals as armories.
All of which I can prove to you right now,
Israel's literally doing,
and all the things they're saying about them,
which wouldn't surprise me have yet to be proven.
But my point is that he starts with two saying the things
as a contrast that the ICC
literally says that they're doing.
And we all see them doing.
Either this person is that shockingly uninformed
or he's acting in the interest of a foreign country
and the against the interest of Americans,
the ICC embarrassed itself, he says,
with these sham charges against Israel's leadership, well,
here's Zeek saying, watch as an Israeli,
IDF soldier uses the Palestinian hostage as a human shield.
Look at him.
He's literally kneeling behind this guy in a blindfold while
they're engaging with
people shooting on the other side of the street.
We already showed you this one. It's an old example.
It's from off after October 7th,
but it's like a month and a half old.
Well, here's another one. This is the one we
already showed you recently.
And Monis caught up with them
and got an entire interview, what it's like to be used
as a human shield by the Israeli army.
Remember this guy? This was recent, this was like a couple
of weeks ago, I think, and they literally had him marching
through every area they were gonna go into
with a blindfold before they went in.
And he goes, Israel soldiers rounded up Ahmed Safi
and his male family members
and kunis, you know, the safe area
and made them stand atop a sand dune for 12 hours
as the soldiers took cover behind them during a firefight
with Palestinian resistance fighters.
Here's the story, unreal, how clear this is.
And all the people screaming your racists
for highlighting this are terrified of both themselves,
recognizing they've always been wrong,
and the fact that they're being shown to be what they are.
And I'm talking about either Zionists
or anybody else who is gaslighting for this, for genocide,
for murder, for rape and pillaging.
And again, don't forget that a lot
of Jewish people are calling that out as well.
So have fun pretending
that's all about hating those, those same people.
Here's you and Ari pointing out a lot,
and I'm not gonna go through this reasonably quick just
because this is every damn day,
but he goes, exclusive footage reveals the Israeli military.
Guess what, just like Scott was ignoring, uh, what's Rick,
uh, Rick Scott exclusive footage shows them storing weapons
and ammunition inside of the Turkish hospital.
Surprise surprise. This happens every time
they're using these as basis guys.
And then they later leave
and the hospital can, in some cases,
resume work and they come back later.
How do you pretend that's not
what exactly what it looks like?
He says, this is another one from May 8th.
We've acquired documentation
that confirms the Israeli military's use of facilities
with the Turkish Cancer Hospital,
as in military headquarters, sniper positions, everything.
Here's Ali Abu Ma pointing out every accusation
by the Zionist Nazis.
And he says that again, you know, my point is I think it's a
clumsy term in most cases, against for any 'cause.
We're not talking about actual Nazis, whether it's,
you know, capitalized or not.
These aren't people part of the Nazi party in most cases.
I can prove to you that people like,
um, what's the guy's name?
Now I'm forgetting the one, the earl, the one
that Dan Cohen highlighted, the oldest reservist,
who is literally connected to the Lehigh party
that literally worked alongside the Nazis.
You can make that argument. My point is simply to say
that the, if, if you're gonna make that a comparison,
the Israeli government is
for the Zionist government is far closer than anything you
could label Hamas.
And even then, so knowing that they're the ones
that funded them into reality kind of makes it a moot point.
In any case, he says that when they sack cues,
it's a confession quote, Israeli troops also appear
to be using the Turkish Palestinian friendship Hospital.
Which one specialize in treatment for cancer patients
as a base of operations.
Rodent. This is the Washington Post.
Who cares though when they do it? We'll just ignore it.
Here is a reporter on the ground, matza al
happening right now.
Israeli snipers blockade. This keeps happening, by the way.
There he goes. Twitter's been
really wonky lately, at least for me.
I think it's probably just for me.
And people like us blocking all wa all old
Alday hospital in Jublia.
So multiple hospitals, surprise surprise,
shoot at the hospital, where are, where there are patients,
wounded medical staff and mothers
and newborns from inside the hospital.
She adds for the second day there's no valid drinking water.
This is not weeks ago, this is right now.
While by the way, they're still,
they're not letting in any aid.
Zero. Let's see if that, let's pop this one up.
What's the date right now? So this is from
217, so we're 10 days later.
Let's see if that one's up yet. There it is.
Let's see what they got. Oh, surprise, surprise.
Look at that zero in the entire
week from May 10th to May 16th.
That is the, okay, so that's the daily average.
The daily total was five trucks
that's going down from 500 a day.
And they were still in food, in food in food. Insecure.
Same the next week, or actually, no, excuse me,
that was just the 17th five average
27 average on the day eight to 18th, 19 zero.
I mean, guys, this is crazy.
This is during a famine
and they've dropped it to be near nothing while he's still,
Elon Levy still screams everything's going the way it should
because he's a complete liar.
Here is Doctors Without Borders.
After a strike on the Gia refugee camp on Gaza on the 18th,
34 patients were admitted to a nearby hospital, ADA,
and amid nearby fighting the hospital has
now run outta drinking water.
According to our colleagues
and other locations in Northern Gaza,
the hospitals surrounded by tanks.
While we were unable to run operations in Northern Gaza,
some of our staff decided to stay to provide care.
This is one of the last
functional hospitals in Northern Gaza.
And some staff and patients are sheltering
inside the fight amid the fighting.
All warning parties must ensure their protection
and that, you know, the point is, keep them safe.
They don't care. The Israeli government
will probably go to that hospital next.
Does anybody, I mean, what's the US gonna say?
Probably Hamas there. What's all the supporters gonna say?
Human shields, right? Human shields, right.
Despite the fact that Israel has been caught repeatedly
using human shields during this conversation,
and we know that that's a policy they've used many times
and continue to use to this very day, 2013
Palestinian children tortured, used as shields
by Israel per the United Nations.
Reuters, Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy,
a 9-year-old as human shields, avoid jail.
And that goes on. I've played it many times.
I'll, I'll open this for you,
the entire show here so you can watch it for yourself.
The open secret of human shields,
it's called the Neighbor Procedure,
the UN Human Rights Watch,
amnesty, they've all called it out.
It's just cra And this is, it is the
most obvious image in the world.
It's a public event that you can look up.
It's very, very clear.
And that's not supposed to be that
because that happened, it should be ignored.
I'm not, I'm not as ridiculous as the Israeli government.
If anybody's doing that,
they should all be held accountable.
My point is that you can prove this explicitly.
And yet when they keep yelling about what Hamas is doing,
I've yet to see any provable amp examples of that.
Not even to say that I would shock me if I found them
or that they showed 'em to me.
My point is, you just haven't done that.
And that's crazy to me.
Here is another post from the, from, uh,
roi Abdul from the Human Hero Met Human Rights Group showing
you what they're doing to these hospitals.
Now watch this, guys. This is pretty wild.
Oh, I didn't download that. I want you to hear this.
Actually, hold on. This is, this is a real shot
from inside the hospital.
What hospital? Full of patients.
You know, they keep screaming.
It's all about human shields, right?
Well, here's what it looks like inside one
of these hospitals while they bomb them,
supposedly going after human shields.
And how many times have I said this?
Like realistically asking yourself
every single time, what do we see?
We see the fallout, right?
We see all the children that they claim.
We're human shields. And yet no human.
We only see the shields they claim every single time we
built, we, uh, we remove all the building rubble and weird.
All you find is a bunch of shields, right?
I'm not trying to be belittling with the people.
I'm making a point. Those are dead children, dead families.
Where's the human that was supposed to be shielded by that
or we pretending they got away just in time?
Are we here to pretend? I mean all this pertinent possible,
but my point is, every, so for seven months,
we only ever see the byproduct and not the,
because that's not what's happening.
Sure is what's actually happening.
This is what they're doing to hospitals.
While people are inside them
- Down, down.
I show off up. These are all
- Ambulance driver,
- But - Don't forget ambulance
driver are protective as well.
All they do is just go, there're
lost with nothing to back it up.
- What? No, no, no, no.
- Feel crazy to me because of all the propaganda.
You know, even Christians out there would argue, would hear
that and act like there's some kind of cry, erase a cry
to terrorism or something.
He's just saying God. He's saying, God, God.
Like this is, you know, this is cra just like
any other person would.
Oh my God, this is crazy.
But because of all the extreme propaganda, all the thing,
you know, the statements that should akin, I mean,
you could scream God
and throw a, throw a bomb to
that's happened from all his points of history.
Whether you're talking about the, I mean any number
of examples from any side of any religion
or any race, the point is that people tend
to call on their religion, but
because of the propaganda it becomes
so people are just blinded by this stuff.
And, and it's very clear in this country
that people believe, I mean, we went through a period
where any, any era
after nine 11 was, it was a problem, was dangerous.
It, it's just inherently disgusting.
But this is what they're doing to hospitals here.
You and Ro points out what I was gonna show you earlier.
What I said earlier here is an Israeli war, Israeli,
uh, IDF posting their crimes
on their own social media accounts.
But remember, you know what I keep saying about this?
It shows you they have no control over their own army.
I mean, either this means that they want this to happen,
which shows you how just completely deranged the entire
system is, or they actually
can't control what they're doing.
And they're out there posting their own word crimes on
TikTok, which the ICC and ICJ are collecting.
And it says in Sergeant Sema Luling from the 9 8 800 90th
battalion quote, you have to,
you have too much China stuff in your kitchen.
So it's a kitchen of a Gaza family.
He says, I was happy to help you residents of con Eunice
as much as I had time to go sue me at the hog.
The Hague. You bastards. Here's what he is doing.
He's throwing their China and breaking it out in the street
Shows you the kind of de deprivate, the kind
of derangement we're talking about.
You hate Palestinians, all of them.
And as we've heard from plenty of the people speaking off,
you know, the whistleblowers, whether there's been three
or four of them now, they want revenge.
It's being prog, it's being promoted within
the Israeli establishment.
They want revenge on all Palestinians. It's not hard to see.
And this is an old thread here. There's a bunch of 'em.
January 16th, this guy torches the Palestinian factory
and he writes, add a charge to the indictment in the Hague
for contributing to global warming.
They're ma they're making fun
of everybody trying to hold them accountable.
You work hard to go over a house shooting at a home for fun.
And the next day he publishes a video showing a D nine,
destroying everything he writes.
And the next day the D nine comes and destroys everything.
Why do I even bother? They're all admitting
what they're doing, just randomly opening fire at people's
homes, where in some cases there are still people in them.
Whole thread. Here's one
of those most disgusting examples I've seen,
and it's not even gruesome or graphic.
These are the toys of children either dead
or starving to death,
or literally struggling from place to place
who are desperate, have lost everything they've ever had.
And as Saul Rod points out,
Israel has killed thousands upon thousands
of children in Gaza who will never return home
or play with their toys again.
This inhumanity is
what they call the most moral army in the world.
This is what us gives billions of dollars to support
just sitting there, eating their food,
sitting in their home, making fun of them.
Express news points out.
And we've already, we've already seen this one actually,
this, this breakdown clip.
But oh wait, this was, oh,
did I grab the, oh, you know what?
I grabbed the wrong one. Sign of a gun.
This is, this is from, this is the Gili attack.
We already showed you this one. This is suppress news.
Had a different clip. I I don't wanna go grab it right now.
Lemme see if I can grab real quick. Hold on.
as I say that, uh,
yeah, I don't wanna waste the time.
So I'll, I'll bring it up in the next show.
He was just reporting on. There's another one I have right
here, actually, uh, one of these.
Anyway, there's the ongoing attacks. Put it that way.
In all of these areas, by the way, this, if you,
since I have included, it's in the show notes.
This is just the attack.
They, they carried out on a refugee camp
killing civilians and journalists.
It was all public and nobody seems
to care in the international community.
Here's Gianni also pointing out,
dear ICJI found another instance of incitement to genocide
by the IDF on December 21st, 2023.
Israeli Sergeant Devo Juli wrote, quote,
may your village burn while fighting in Gaza in
an Instagram post.
She took pictures in front of Palestinian homes
and structures that she had set on fire.
Most moral army in the world, guys.
I mean, this is this, it's not as cra I mean,
I mean it might as well be, but you know, think of like, uh,
Guantanamo Bay and the pictures of smiling US military
with Arabs and do in, in choking, you know, being tortured.
It feels that. It feels like that.
And don't forget who trained them here.
Stephen Dinger saying in another example saying,
does anyone find this as repulsive as I do?
The New York Times published a photo
of Israel Israeli soldiers taking selfies
to celebrate the massive destruction they caused.
Destruction that experts believe amounts to genocide.
Look at this. These are kids guys.
These are kids that have been brainwashed into thinking
they're fighting terrorists, sort of like the US military.
It's disgusting. Here's an example of an ex, an individual.
This is a real story.
Palestinian elderly man, just like the one we talked about a
second ago, his name is Bilal Al al Jamala.
He was released by the Israeli occupation
from a military checkpoint handcuffed
with zip ties, severely tortured.
And then as he was walking away, they shot him in the back.
I just don't know how you make sense. That is hatred.
That is pure evil.
And now I guess he's fighting to survive.
Look, they're even taking, look,
they're taking off the wrist.
Look how tight they're in his hand, guys. My God.
So all that shows you in the wor I mean,
aside from the worst of it, which is this being devious,
torturous as that they released him.
So that's essentially going, look, he's not Hamas,
but we're gonna shoot him in the back
anyway because we're evil.
Here's Isra a censored man,
which interestingly highlights back to this,
or wait, this one about Mayor Village Burn.
Here's a bunch of chil, a bunch of kids in Israeli school
dancing and chanting.
You know what they're saying? May your village burned down.
You know what they're aiming to that a Palestinian teacher
who was atten, who was, who had attended
the Nakba Day march.
And apparently that teacher is being threatened
with dismissal for her job, for, you know,
caring about Palestinian death.
And the children say,
Palestinian children are raised to hate.
That's, that's what we get told right there,
which in some cases you probably are, right.
My point is that this is exactly
what we're trying to highlight.
That this is a culture that has convinced these people
that it's okay to hurt and kill innocent people
because you don't like who they are now,
it's not just in Gaza.
Here's the West Bank, Israeli settlers attack, the town
of Yama, south of Nalu, setting fire
to Palestinian properties.
Guys, this happens constantly.
Nobody, I mean, literally,
I don't even think Israel pretends this is a co okay?
They just don't care. But even the us everybody says
this is wrong, but guess what?
Nobody tries to stop it. Israeli settler militias.
This is an important part of the story.
So this has to do with aid,
but also just the settlers doing whatever they want
with zero accountability in the West Bank.
Israeli settlers attack aid trucks destined for Gaza, the US
or the, the US too.
But the Israeli military,
in fact usually guard them while they do this.
This is a coordinated institutional event,
but here's where it gets even interesting, more interesting.
Giannis Ri points out
that he's receiving reports from Novelis from West Bank.
We see the, we Israeli settlers attacking
these aid trucks everywhere.
Here's an example where they attacked somebody
who was not driving aid and still nobody will care.
Plus the host country decides to actually do what's right.
Israeli settlers attack Palestinian trucks near Nala.
Punch up the truck, the tires of the truck,
the driver's shirtless, probably got lynched.
He writes, we have a follow up to this.
Israeli settlers blocked the road for these trucks.
So here's my point. So this guy, it's arrive,
a truck gets pulled outta, the truck gets beat up.
Here's what happened. This is BM highlighting.
They thought it was Aid de Gaza.
He says, even though I told them the goods were for my work,
they took me off the truck
and started beating me brutally in all parts of my body.
According to him, more than a hundred settlers were there.
They only did it because I'm Arab.
He said, cursed at me
and to continue to attack me
until they inflicted severe injuries on me.
He was taken to the hospital in moderate condition.
Don't you think the world
should care about something like that?
Doesn't that sound like a hate crime?
Don't you think that's what the Thera,
the US states government pretends they care about?
The point is that this wasn't even aid,
and it doesn't even matter because there's
so little accountability right now.
It is rampant. This is just a small example of
how wrong this is right now in every possible way.
And that they are leaning into it.
You've got us politicians that are saying you're racist
for not supporting this.
Here's Giannis Ri highlighting another clip
hosted on social media,
Israeli soldier from the 55th Paratroopers brigade,
literally showing the flattening to the ground
of the safe zone known as con Eunice.
Look at this. These are, that's, that's an,
that's multiple city blocks and,
and you know, tractors and blowing things.
I mean, this is about completely flattening the area
and they keep telling you
that they're having conferences about it.
And yet we get lied to by Biden
and the rest of the meek followers
that the pretend are our government.
And there's another, a whole thread of the same damn stuff.
Scenes from Israeli soldiers showing from the 626,
so actually 6261st Battalion
of the 261st Brigade,
systematically blowing up civilian homes in eastern parts
of con unis over
and over, randomly shooting at the mosque in the
city and laughing about it.
More blowing up of homes.
Here's examples of, uh, Ukrainian fighters. Look at it.
We keep showing you this guys, you know why that's relevant?
Because the Ukrainians are actually openly neo-Nazi
and they're happily working alongside the Zionist group.
Make sense of it? You can, if you really want to.
I'm gonna include that for a show
coming up, just 'cause it's important.
I forgot about that.
There's plenty more in there.
Now, Elijah Monet points this out.
The destruction of Gaza.
And this is, um, actually, I'm familiar with the platform,
but he said it's a, it looks like a French platform.
Oh, you know, I'm sorry, I take it back.
I forgot where we were on this. This is a report that I i,
I broke down for you right here.
We'll show you next. He says, the destruction
of Gaza on the Madrid map between,
and this is what's really important.
It's exactly what we already know, but it's being confirmed.
A third and fourth time between 40
and 50%
of all munitions launched on Gaza since October 7th have
been unguided unguided,
which means there's just no way you could pretend
that they're pinpoint targeting Hamas like the liar Alan
Dershowitz says, or as Netanyahu claims.
The point is, you're getting this stuff, where was it?
You're getting that stuff.
Complete destruction of entire areas, many
of which have people in them unguided, demolition.
And now we're not talking about demolition,
we're talking about targeted bombing using the 200,
2000 pound dumb bombs, which by the way,
as we've shown you many times, the New York Times
and Harts broke this down,
that they have proven Israel's using the most destructive
bombs in the sea areas.
And those are the dumb bombs without guidance.
Here's the report. I'll just break down what it's,
lemme change the, uh, title for you here
from ar from, uh, our Gonzo to, uh, Tuan, the Destruction
of Gaza on the map of Madrid.
It says the use of dumb bombs
or imprecise bombs that have provoked the condemnation
of organizations like Amnesty International
or Human Rights Watch amid accusations of war crimes
and genocide and a transfer
of weapons from the us the main supplier to Israel,
which continues to be produced
beyond Joe Biden's specific decision
to freeze shipment two weeks ago.
My point exactly, they never stopped it.
So as Brian mast acts like he's doing legislation
to force them to do the thing
they all know they're still doing.
It's an illusion. It's a show.
Between 40 and 50%
of all munitions launched in Gaza have been unguided.
And these are much less precise than smart
bombs and guided bombs.
It says so far the Americans have sent the Israelis 15,000
to 25,000 bombs and about 60,000 artillery shells.
But the Israelis have used, according
to the Israeli military officials,
three times more than they expected in Gaza.
That is why they have used the unguided bombs.
MK eight two, for example, which we talked about all the way
back in Yemen, which killed a school bus full of children.
So nothing new for the US government.
So when they used unguided bombs, it means
that they cause serious damage
and they may not reach the desired target.
That's a quote. But they swear up
and down that they're only targeting civilians, right?
'cause they know. Well, here's a great thread by ah,
Maud Israeli crimes and Western eyes.
In this thread, he says he post
of Israel's crimes across the decades with media sources
shedding light on the period of 1940 to 2022.
Get ready to witness what's hidden.
Now we're not gonna go through this today.
Most a lot we, we've talked about.
I will go pro, I probably will go
through this more in depth in a future show.
My point is that this is the reality
that goes back long before October 7th.
So we just talked about what's happened since today.
But if you really break this stuff down, he starts
with the Belfor declaration and the ongoing nabas
after that to this very day.
But this is not a new reality.
And in fact, if you really look at what happened
during the Naba and the second Naba, it's shockingly similar
to what we're seeing right now
because it's the same damn thing.
And here's what Netanyahu said.
I believe this was 20 something years
ago when he was younger.
You'll wanna hear this, especially
after what we just showed you.
- But it is not terrorism
because what terrorists do
is target the innocent deliberately and
therefore, my definition of terrorism is the systematic
and deliberate attack.
The murder of naming
and medicine, of innocence of civilian
for, uh, political goals.
- Cradle, always doing good work.
Is that not what they're doing? Right?
I mean, in fact, that's the real definition of, of terrorism
until the US kind of contorted into being the
people they point to, right?
Which is using violence to commit to achieve political ends.
That's the real definition. You know why they changed that?
Because it's easy to lay
that lens over everything that's being done today.
The US government is constantly using violence
to achieve its political lens.
So they have to change it like they change the definition
of gain of function and whatever else.
The point is that
what he just highlighted is aiming
at civilians intentionally.
Guys, there is more evidence to
that than literally anything on the table.
Let's not forget what the IDF whistleblower said.
I played it in the beginning, but this is only one of many.
- Do you think that you witnessed war crimes taking place?
- Probably, probably the ground assumption is
that they are Hamas
and then if you go this way, you're bound
to kill people that are not
- Now in a rare interview, one,
one soldier tells us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say?
- There are no uninvolved. Only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
- Easy. It's not hard to miss that, right?
So what he's highlighting right there is exactly,
let's see if I can pull this up.
Yep. There we go. Oh, here,
here's the show in case you wanna watch it.
It's actually really powerful. I have a about a six minute
clip that I break down from the entire interview
that has a lot of the information in it.
But you can watch in here, idea
of whistleblower admits in institutional war crimes are
openly being committed in Gaza.
What you heard in that little clip is it's not even remotely
the most damning parts, but it's very clear, right?
That yes, the the main point
that everybody there is it's either, you know, armed or not.
The point is they're all guilty and they're killing innocent
people on the record all the time.
So doesn't that make what he says here more relevant
deliberately targeting civilians or political goals?
Yes. And by the way, that also includes your own people.
Allah, the Hannibal directive, which is provably,
in my opinion, that's one of the most provable aspects
of all of this, because the colonel has admitted it.
Helicopter pilots have admitted it.
Tank drivers have admitted it. The head security
of the kibbutz area has openly admitted it.
Israeli hostages
and PI mean, it's, I mean, it's,
I've never seen something better sourced in my life,
and yet we still debate it.
It's shocking how clearly they have control over this
conversation, but they have lost what most of it
over the last seven months of self-defense.
Well, on top of all of that, this just drives me crazy.
Now, look, I, I'll just read
what I said because I include it.
RFK Jr on Russell Brand's podcast
with shockingly little pushback says,
I don't think Israel's intention is genocide,
which I dunno why we would ever speak about intent.
How the hell you think, you know,
what they all collectively think when we're talking
about the actions of the government?
And even then, now what? Now who thinks, for example?
But whatever it says, I don't believe there's
any evidence of genocide.
Let that sink in. No evidence of decide, you know,
despite the World Court saying
there's evidence for genocide.
The IDF has protected civilians better than
any army in history.
He said, I said,
RFK just said the IDF has protected
civilians better than any army in history.
This man, despite,
and I mean this being better in most ways than the other can
presidential candidates, is either compromised in some way
or willfully dishonest when it comes to Israel and Zionism.
I just don't know how else you read that.
And look, if I gun to my head, if I had to pick one
of the fake candidates put
in front of us, it'd probably be him.
But I, it's incredible to think that the, I mean, as I said,
and I stand by this from the moment he opened his mouth
about this next to that maniac, rabbi Schmoley, he,
what his stance in Israel is morally
indefensible, but so is Biden.
So is Trump's. It's no different.
So my point is that this isn't about just trying to go
after the one that seemed like that's how
that will get framed by some,
but it's clear in almost every other way.
He's at least better than the rest of them, in my opinion.
But my God, I don't know
how you can take the rest of it at face value.
How can you be anti-war?
How can you be anything you claim to be, if this is
how you frame the most obvious thing
going on in the world right now?
Now, look, I, the thing I've said before,
and I, some people even say this in the chat,
they wanna believe that he's doing this just to get elected
and he's gonna change everything and it's all ploy.
I, I hope so. It would be a pretty brazen move.
But if he did, I would go. I, I that's great.
I just don't think that's what's happening.
I would, I, I hope you are right.
Like I've hope, like any honest person should
hope, we'll wait and see.
Here's what Biden said. Now,
this is the, one of the worst parts of this.
This came out, I, I think this was on the 19th actually,
if I, but just recently
and made this statement about something
that we can prove is not true.
And I can almost guarantee you this was given to him
by somebody within the Zionist circles in order to downplay
or hype up against some kind of a ity propaganda circle
of news to stop the focus on everything we're talking about.
Whether it is the fact
that just killed an international UN member
that got buried under the claims of Hamas policemen
that were, were just actually policemen
or the idea of taking down an Israeli, uh,
Iranian helicopter or the idea of,
of committing coups and the Congo.
I mean, any number of things or just the obvious
genocide that they're committing.
This is what he had to say. And by the way,
it's the same place he was floating the Congolese flag
behind their Democratic Republic Congo,
which is disgusting based on what they're doing.
Here's what he said.
- What's happening in Gaza, in Israel is heartbreaking.
Hamas' vicious attack on Israel, killing innocent lies
and holding people hostage.
- That's first of all where you go with that.
It's heartbreaking what's happening in Gaza.
Look at what they did on the seventh
and at least be a little,
I mean, somebody could write that a little better.
- I was there nine days
after sent pictures of tying a mother and a daughter
and a rope pouring kerosene on them, burning 'em
and watching as they die.
- A hundred percent false. I mean, think about this guys.
The first of all, evident, I mean interna, interna, I mean,
uh, not international, but, um, independent bodies,
at least within the Israeli investigation,
have spoken about the reality
that there is nothing they've seen.
I'm talking about people that have been allowed
to be stressful screenings.
Like for instance, Owen Ben
or Owen, uh, Jones from the Guardian, right?
Saying that doesn't,
what you said is in here, is not in here.
I've watched it. And so, so two of the others,
and they agree, we didn't see what you claim was there.
So some of them are lying. Clearly.
The point is that the evidence that has been presented,
which has not changed, has been seen by some people
who have acknowledged that there are no beheaded babies.
There are no evidence, there's no evidence of 90%,
90% of what what they said happened.
There's no babies in an oven.
There's no babies cut out of a woman's stomach.
There's no babies in a clothes line.
They lied about all of it.
So my point is, that didn't happen based on everything we've
been presented with as the full body of the evidence.
But on top of that, do we believe
that if Israel had this tucked away,
they wouldn't have shown this by now?
And on top of that, he's talking about a picture
that was shown to him nine days afterward.
There's nothing about this Real Biden is a tool,
and frankly, I don't even think he knows it.
I think he's so senile and lost at this point.
It doesn't even matter, but it matters
to the people that you're gaslighting.
It matters to the genocide that you're hiding.
As Max says, he had another sickening lie
to justify his Israel's genocide.
And, and the squirrel just adds to this saying, well,
in fact, I think he actually put it out there first.
It was May 19th, I think this one came out on the 20th.
The point is that the court, the squirrel highlighted this
saying, and, and this was on 19th saying in his commencement
speech, this is what he said, what we just played for you.
And then as always, he has a great thread
breaking down some tangential information about the NY,
the New York Times and Washington Post,
you know, scam reports.
They've already been retracted by the way,
yet the lingering elements around it have yet
to be retracted, which is what we always show you
and how this works, right?
Where they put out the fake story
and then other, other outlets report about what they said,
and then they other reports point back to that one
and say, here's another second source,
when all they're doing is pointing to each other.
So the point is that even though the New York Times
breaking news about rape story has been retracted,
the other ones that point to that are still going around
and act like we can prove it.
So the point is, he breaks down all this good information
about the lie that has been circulating.
Oh, look at that. Where was it? Oh no, it's the wrong one.
But anyway, here's what he said about this.
He said, this is such an insane lie on so many levels.
What does it even mean that you saw photos
of them tying a mother and daughter together
and pouring kerosene on them,
burning them and watching as they die?
Like, think about how that even makes sense.
Who was taking these photos in perfect sequence
so you could see all that happening?
Like you realize one photo
but then encapsulate what he just said there.
But again, that's usually biden's senility.
You're not even realizing what he's saying,
but he says, what the F are you talking about?
Well, he just calls him out
and he says, everyone in the prestige liberal media
class is thinking this is normal.
They all repost his speech.
New York Times show even showing you the ones
that are pretending to be in line
with the campus protests are in fact just
going along to get along.
They're all part of the problem. Here's a good video.
We're gonna end with a point about the pier.
Here's a good video, which I played before.
It just needs to be seen again and again.
It's a leak video from 2001 Alii. Point this out.
Listen to Netanyahu say
that Israel intentionally strikes Palestinians, painfully,
he brags about deceiving the US to break the Oslo accords
and confirms Americans will always support Israel.
Now think about that. When you get your politicians
and your two party screamers acting like you're un-American,
if you don't support Israel,
ask yourself what that's coming from.
The main thing is first to strike them.
The main thing is first of all, to strike it not once,
but several times so painfully
That the price they pay is unbearable.
Now, this is about the idea of carpet bombing Gaza
because of a rocket hit a field.
And in many cases where the rocket was even fired from Gaza,
and I've talked about this, it's just about setting a tone
or working, trying to create a political, political,
political benefit for himself.
Usually because he's about to go to jail
or be being accused of something that's been written about
by Israeli media many times.
He says, so far the price tag is not unbearable
being they haven't hurt them enough.
He goes, I mean, a large scale
attack on the Palestinian authority
- Causing - Them to fear
that everything is about to collapse.
Fear is what brings them to hold on.
He goes, but then again, the world will say
that we're the aggressors, right?
'cause they are
so they can say whatever they want.
Aren't you afraid of what they'll say? Bibi, his nickname,
- Especially - Today with the us I know how they are.
America is something that you can easily maneuver.
Listen up Republicans and move in the right direction.
- And - Even if they say something,
so then they say something.
So what? Yeah, he's learning.
That's different today, isn't he?
80% of America supports us.
He says, it's absurd.
He said, he doesn't think highly of you.
He says, look, I wasn't afraid
to maneuver at the Clinton administration.
I wasn't afraid to confront Clinton.
I wasn't afraid to go against the un.
What happened to the Oswell accords?
The accords which were ratified by parliament.
I was asked before the 1996 elections,
well, you fulfill them.
I said, yes, subject to reciprocity and minimizing pullouts.
I gave my own interpretation to the agreements in such a way
that will allow me to stop the race back towards the
1967 porters.
There's no way to misunderstand that. It's a lie.
He's using you political American government.
I mean they, most of them know that. Don't care.
They're doing this against your interest.
America needs to listen to this
and saying that he,
he put forward his so-called agreement in such a way
that he knew he'd be able to stop it from happening.
That's not honest. This is how do we manage to do this?
Nobody defined what military facilities are. So he lied.
He played, he, it's the same thing the US government does
with the way they frame their legislation.
They leave it open to interpretation
so they can manipulate it however they want at your expense.
He says, so I define them as being security zones.
The entire Jordan Valley for me is a military facility.
Nobody has. Yes, like the pet screen valley.
She, she responded, he says, you see, go figure.
But then there was the question of
who will define these military facilities.
I received a letter from Secretary of State Warren to me
and Arafat at the same time saying
that Israel and Israel alone
will define the military facilities,
their locations and size.
Now, they don't want to give me this letter.
If I refuse to ratify the hi accords of 1997.
I stopped the government meeting and I said, I won't sign
Only when the letter has arrived during that meeting to me
and to Rafat, I signed the hi accords.
It's better to give 2% than a hundred percent.
And this is the choice we've faced.
The point he's making is that we have a a an out.
We'll sign it as long as you give us this letter,
which suggests that I get to dictate the terms,
which means I can create the dynamic which makes it look
like they are the ones breaking the rules or whatever it is.
It's exactly what we're dealing with today.
It's the same person, same group, same conversation.
And on top of that, we'll get to the peer next to end.
It's what they're doing there,
acting like we're doing this for them.
When all you're doing is cementing in something you're gonna
use to hurt them again.
He says, you gave 2%, but you stopped the
withdrawal rather than a hundred percent.
That's the reality.
And yet all these people in the two party illusion will act
like you're wrong for not supporting that.
Even though they've seen that, they just don't care.
Now here's the last part. NY plaid points this out.
Note the humanitarian port lying terrorist dogs,
he says the US army installs the USC Ram air defense system
to protect the floating dock in Gaza.
'cause that makes sense, right? In addition
to the American EMDs, the system de uh, dedicated
to combating marches, he says,
why are all these systems put in place as long
as a dock is humanitarian
and its goal is to deliver aid the people of Gaza.
And the point on top of that being
that Israel is in control of the area.
So are you pretending that you're not secure in
and of, in of yourself in regard to the areas?
I mean, you got Israeli military Navy
because that's, this is not about humanitarian aid.
He says we repeat and repeat the human facade,
but what was hidden was greater.
Now here you can see people have taken images,
but they're already installing their
military defense systems.
And the post simply says,
the US Army installs the USC Ram air defense system
to protect the floating dock.
Oh, they just broke it down. The same thing in addition
to the American EMDs.
So what they're doing is making another military base,
both a sort of a joint usis Israeli base,
because it was really Netanyahu's plan
long before this ever happened.
For the, for the pier, which they earlier floated
as some kind of area to store all the Gaza people.
Then they pushed it for appear for humanitarian aid.
So the point is, even one conversation,
they shifted why they would use this, and we just let it go.
Or rather American politicians let it go.
So at the end of the day, it's not what it seems.
And I said, only a complete fool or a willfully or,
or the willfully ignorant did not see this coming.
This was never about humanitarian aid.
Meanwhile, GA's, a famine. Alright?
So this is supposed to fix the problem.
So we'll, we're gonna put in all the install into the
military installations first and bring all
of our pe We're gonna bring over ships
and ships of equipment and everything set on a
not a drop of food or water.
Then we're gonna bring in all the military
equipment, not a drop of food or water.
Meanwhile, by the time we maybe maybe pretend
to bring in food, it's gonna be two
months later and they're all gonna be dead.
But you know, oops, we tried. Right?
It's just so self-evident.
Everything about this is, I know you guys see it.
I know the world sees it, yet it still continues
to goose march forward, goose, step forward.
So what's happening? We're watching it.
The question is, are we gonna do something about it?
And I never mean violence, but I do believe
that there are ways with this much momentum
to truly stop them in their tracks.
I just hope we have the courage to continue to do so,
to stay the course and fight for the people that truly
deserve to be fought for.
Whether you're Israeli or American or Palestinian or Jewish
or Muslim or Christian.
The people who are being lied about,
who are being oppressed, who are living
with a boot on their neck,
and all of them are in that category in some way
or another in the world, that
those are the people we should fight for.
Ask the Ethiopian Jews, right?
Ask the Torah Judaism group
that gets beat up in the in Israel all the
time for talking about Zionism.
Ask the Muslims all around the world, in these countries
that are attacked by the United States.
Ask any number of Christians in the world
how they're being treated in
places where Israel bombed them.
Like in Syria. Ask any number
of these groups anywhere in the world,
and you will find oppressed people who are being gaslit
and lied about and stepped on.
And the best they can do is say you only hate Jews
because you dare to fight for any of them.
It's time to stand up. Never has there been a more important
time to stand up and fight.
And I again, don't mean violence, but I mean fight.
But thank you for tuning in today, guys.
I really, really hope that we can get something like,
I mean, as I said many times, this just the day in,
day out watching of this tragedy is just heartbreaking.
And I believe we're making a difference.
I mean, I know that we are,
but I feel like we're at a point where there's no way,
like I, I mean I, what can we do?
Let me know. Reach out. Let's talk about this.
Like what else can we do to mobilize this
to stop in real time what they're doing.
I mean, all the tools are in place.
I just don't, I mean, I do, I know what it is.
It's the, it's the top of the level.
People at the two party illusion
that are pointing at everything else like the scarecrow.
And we're letting this continue
as we're pointing at other issues and other topics.
I mean, other things are obviously going on in the world,
but it should matter to us
that everything we're our tax dollars
and our our weaponry, it's all going
to kill innocent people.
While I'm saying this,
children are being di are being killed, as I'm saying this,
children are starving to death right now.
I don't know how that doesn't matter
to the world's professed rules based international order
or leader of the free world
or any of the nonsense that we push
out about our government.
We can do that as the people of this country.
The government has shown itself
to not be fighting for your interests.
Now, statements like that, that are gonna get people
that are gonna get me in trouble, which
if I cared about getting in
trouble, I wouldn't be doing this.
But I know that's where this is going.
Now, if we can truly mobilize an effort, maybe not, maybe,
we'll, these people are on the knife's edge right now.
They're a precipice. They're about
to fail or cement this forever.
And the point is that right now
being the one calling them out as a, as you know,
potentially treasonous, well, yeah,
that might not work out well for me
or anybody honest about this conversation,
but if we don't, well it guarantees
that it's gonna continue and I'm not okay with that.
So like all of us, I believe we should be willing
to risk everything to fight for what matters.
So thank you for tuning in, continuing
to support this platform and anybody else
who deserves to be fought for.
I love you all as always.
Question everything come
to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.
- This is the Defense Minister Lon, uh,
talking just a couple of weeks ago.
Israel is going to hurt Lebanese civilians
to include kids of the family.
We went through a very long discussion.
We did it then we did it in the Gaza Strip.
We are going to do it in any round
of hostilities in the future.
As the defense minister, uh, this is the, uh, uh,
military chief of staff, Benny Gans.
The next round of violence will be worse
and see this suffering increase.
He headed up the military assaults, uh, on Gaza.
The last, uh, two. This is the Minister for Education
in the Netanyahu government.
There will never be a peace plan with the Palestinians.
I will do everything in my power
to make sure they never get a state.
He also said, if you catch terrorists,
you simply have to kill them.
I've killed a lot of Arabs in my life
and there's no problem with that.
Uh, this is the Minister for Justice.
Palestinians are all enemy combatants.
This also includes the mother, the mothers of the martyrs.
They should follow their sons.
Nothing would be more just, they should go
as should the physical homes in which they are,
which they raised the snakes.
Otherwise more little snakes will be raised there.
That's the Israeli Minister for Justice.
In the last few months, the Israeli minister
for a Deputy Minister for defense Palestinians are beasts.
They are not human.
Uh, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, CP Hot hotly.
This is the last one. My position is that between the sea
and the Jordan River, there needs to be one state only.
The state of Israel. There is no place for any agreement
of any kind that discusses the concession
of Israeli sovereignty over lands conquered in 1967.
Now, these are the official statements of several ministers
of the current government of Israel.
In one case, actually advocating genocide
of all Palestinians, including children
and calling them snakes.
Now, can I ask you, Ock, uh, do you not think
that if we're defining terrorism, that is the language
and thinking of terrorists,
that it is absolutely unacceptable in civilized politics,
in civilized international relations for the heads
of government of a state that we carry on normal relations
with, and who you met in Paris to advocate those sort
of views when we know they have also led onto the debts
of thousands of Palestinians, uh, innocent chil men, women
and children, what have you to say, Tisha, about those sort
of views being expressed by the Israeli government.