- Let me, let me preface these remarks with, I never,
never ever believe Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to know
that the Israelis are patent
liars in their intelligence community,
in their propaganda community, certainly,
and in their leadership, they are inveterate liars.
Let me say that again. They are liars.
So you can't believe anything that comes out of Jerusalem.
It's
- Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise show dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours
- Saturday, May 18th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, unfortunately, I have just over an hour to get done.
Something I wanted to cover today.
Really one of the few,
or a couple of the few things that I had
I to pull a lot aside today.
Um, and I don't wanna keep letting you know why.
I'm sure you guys are aware the, the building
and ongoing stuff, it's, it's impossible.
It seems to do all these things at the same time,
but I'm trying, I'm trying to get work done at the same time
as we're dealing with people
building and different things happening.
And so my point is to let you know it's going
to be short whether I want it to be running long or not.
And I plan on giving you guys a kind
of breakdown view on this.
Probably one of the shows as well, just
'cause, you know, I'm sure you guys are excited to see
what it looks like other than just this right here.
And so I will be doing that very soon.
Unfortunately only have about an hour today.
So I'm gonna get to some important topics
and I'm looking forward to the moment
where I won't be bound by these things.
And we'll be able to do more the, you know,
what you guys have become accustomed to
with less gaps in between the shows.
So today we're gonna talk about the important follow up
and just a couple of the points, but I want the links
and information will be there for you guys to look
for the rest of it because as you know,
these International Court of justice
or the world court proceedings are long.
There's a lot of conversation, a lot of back and forth,
or rather just, you know, different times they have all
allotted to give their view and their statements.
And I wanted to make sure you saw
that this hadn't gone away, this is still happening
and that the ICJ
or rather the people representing South Africa have come
forward with more follow up, more information.
And of course, the Israel sends just a few delegates when
demonstrating clearly that this is either they don't want us
to think that they think it's important
or that they are just simply not
caring what's happening here.
We're also gonna talk about a couple
of other important things around all of this.
One being that Israel continues
to this moment to block food aid.
Now that's not necessarily something bombshell,
but I wanted to make sure we are aware,
as I showed you last time, that the aid has dropped off
to near nothing over the last so many weeks as we know
that there is starvation, famine level happening.
And this has been deliberate the entire time, according
to everybody who has any standing in this conversation
and in regard to human rights groups and,
and people that are, uh, I forget the name of the group
that literally made the scale of whether
or not it's famine all very clear.
This is deliberate. People from the United Nations,
from media organizations, from even corporate media
openly calling them out for
what they claim they're not doing,
videotaping them, doing so.
And then on top of this, as all of us can see, the settlers
that continue to destroy the food, the food,
stop the trucks, pull people out of the trucks, be violent
with those people and incor
and having c uh, celebratory actions in front of it.
Raves, uh, discos.
I mean, you know, they're, they're different,
but the point being that they're just different di
celebrations and, and, and,
and even beating up people, I i I, I just showed you
that yesterday or day before yesterday,
but I'm gonna play, uh, if I get time, a clip
of an interview with her
or she's saying that she went out there
as a Jewish Israeli saying we shouldn't be destroying this
food for humanitarian reasons,
but she makes the point in regard to the fact
that it's gonna go to hostages too.
She gets slapped in the face by the settlers that are trying
to destroy the food.
It's just, it's so disgusting how obvious all this is.
We're also gonna start with a point about
nanotechnology I thought was important that I just wanted
to include, that I really thought was just interesting
because there's a lot of other things going on in the world
than just this, as you guys well know.
And of course there was a couple other points I'll get to,
but I'll leave it there just in case we don't have time.
So let's go ahead and get started in regard to the ICJ
and actually starting with the now technology point.
Uh, let's see and make sure I'm lined up here.
Yeah, actually, I wanted to start with one thing
that I really think is important,
and not just for the sense of like, let's all laugh at this
because these people are ridiculous
because you know, a lot of, a lot of the, you know, and,
and my even I myself will,
will enjoy pointing out some things to start the show
that might not be newsworthy or just because it's humorous
or, or because it's, it's relevant to
how bad our government is.
And that's all this, this clip you're gonna see,
which most of you probably already seen.
It's all of those things. And you know, with some
of the more my opinion, low brow individuals within the Cong
Congress, whether that means that you think they're not
necessarily intelligent enough to, you know, whatever you,
I, when I say low brow, I mean
that could be intentional just acting crude and crass,
or it could be that that's just who they are.
My point is that however it is left
or right, what you're gonna see is embarrassing.
Now, whether it's
because a shocking lack of decorum in a situation where
that's not necessary, even
because if we're really talking about what's important
politically, shouldn't you be able
to make these points even scathingly?
So with facts, no, it goes
to belittling each other in petty comments like we're in
kindergarten or rather high school.
And this is my point though, is
that this is relevant far more than just to acknowledge
how bad these people are,
or really my opinion
that these people are in no way in in control
of anything really.
But because it's so alarming to recognize in
so many different ways the kind of power these people have,
they lured over us like some kind of ruler.
And yet in two points, one is that they are in,
like I just said, not actually in control, in my opinion.
I think we can flat out prove that when it comes
to larger dynamics, there's definitely power in, in regard
to their vote and whatever else
you think happens in Congress.
But on top of that, that this is what the world sees us as.
This is this, I really even add a third point.
I see this as representative of the intentional degradation
of this country for the benefit of foreign countries,
for the benefit of other politicians, whatever it is.
And of course everyone's mind in the paradigm will
go to, oh, you mean Russia?
Oh you mean China right now I very clearly mean Israel,
but all three of those are actively something going on.
My point is that this is happening in a way
that is rapidly escalating where people one by, I mean look,
I'm look at the people we have in front of us right now,
and I'm even talking about age,
whether it's someone like Federman
or somebody like, uh, um,
of course I'm blanking on top of my head.
Um, they're Republican in this conversation, uh,
Marjorie Taylor Greene, who, whether it's left
or right, of course as we get into the point, the people
that like
that person will argue I'm some kind of lefty or right.
You know, that that's always how the two party illusion can
make sense of these objective realities.
They're all ridiculous left and right in this conversation.
But there are special points, like,
like I often point out people like Maxine Waters and,
and, um, I'm forgetting her name,
don't know why the other one that is going senile
that can can't mumbles half the time in can Nancy Pelosi.
My point is they're ridiculous, cartoonish almost,
and there's just as many on the right.
We need to realize that this is
how the two party illusion works.
And I've got people who from either side
of this conversation are acting like
what they're saying is somehow, you know,
like we're being soft.
Like, oh, like, like, but
of course no one's trying to censor them.
At least from I my perspective, I guarantee this is
where this tends to go, is they're gonna try
to act like we now censor
and control speech in this context.
It's not about whether they're allowed to say it,
it's about the fact that these people are demonstrating a
level of juvenile.
Um, what be ility, I'd be, you say that being juvenile,
being childish, and I think this is what is beginning
to spin out into larger groups
inside the paradigm left and right by the way.
But in this case, you can have people
that I already see defending Marjorie Taylor Greene
as if it's, you know, honorable almost to be able
to say these kind of, you know, you get the point.
I can go on. I think this is important.
That's why I took as long I did to say that
because I genuinely think that this is a dangerous thing
that is bleeding into the conversations.
Like it's acceptable to act this way, which
of course you're allowed to act however you want,
but we can just like with free speech, I can do this.
I can say you're a child, what you're doing is, is not
worthy of the position you hold.
And it's not even to say that I respect the people in it,
but the idea of the
what this country could be if we were actually
the things that we say we are.
In any case, let's watch this
clip and you'll see what I mean.
- I'd like to know if any of the Democrats on this committee
are employing, uh, judge me.
Sean's daughter.
- No, please tell me what that has to do
with Mayor Garland Goldman.
- Is she a porn star? - Oh, Goldman, that's right.
He's advising. Okay.
- He's advising Who?
What do you do?
You know what we're here for. You know, we're here about a,
- I don't think you know what you're here for. Well,
- You the one talking about, I guess I
- Think you're fake eyelashes are messing up what?
- Ain't nothing. Hold on, hold on.
- Now first thing I'll say is
I don't know if that's where it started.
That's important in a small way.
Like I said, they're all being ridiculous,
but just to be clear, who knows if there was more
that led up to this, but from the clips perspective,
that's the first low, you know, ridiculous shot.
There's no reason to make that argument.
You could just be like you're being
ridic, you're, you know, whatever.
Make an argument that's based in why she's bad at her job,
not making it about some obviously meant
to be racial overtone comment, which is what this is about.
And the same thing happens back, back to her.
But these are, these are unintentioned things to do.
It's something that we should laugh at.
Like this is worthy of ridicule that they're allowing this
and the rest of the world looks at this
and says that's how stupid Americans are.
Probably all by design, by the way,
- Order Mr.
- Chairman, that's beneath even order
of your committee order.
- I do have a point of order and I would like, uh, to move
to, to take down Ms.
Green's words.
- I believe that's the, - Is absolutely unacceptable.
How dare you. A a, a
- Political - Appearance of another person.
- Okay? And even that, I'll be honest, that drives me crazy.
I am the most important person in the room and I care
and I am the victim or whatever, like making it about her.
All of a sudden, AOC is outraged your grandstanding.
You didn't need to do that.
You're trying to make it look like you're the better person.
That's, that's sad, right?
My point is, they're all like this.
You didn't need to make that
big statement right there either.
- Your feelings hurt her - Words down. Aw. Oh,
- Oh, see?
And that too, your feelings hurt.
Like this is where you, she's,
this is where I'm like, that's my point.
You're getting people on the right that act like
that's somehow the way we should be.
Just suck it up and be tough. Well, fine.
Yeah, you can do that too. Or we should all acknowledge
though that it's just dumb to do that in the first place.
That you are a lesser person for playing this back and forth
and then trying to now act like it's just,
you should just let it roll off your skin.
Well, yeah, maybe you should, but maybe none
of you should be in these positions
because you're all act like children. Girl,
- Baby - Girl.
Oh, really? Don't even play baby girl. I don't think we are
- Gonna move and we're gonna take your
words down. How I second
- That motion.
That was a OC how embarrassing
- Ms. Green agrees to strike her words.
- I believe she apologize. - No, no, no. Perry,
- Hold on.
Then after Mr. Perry's gonna be recognized, then Ms.
- I'm not admitted. 21 - Reserve.
- I not apologizing. No, - Let's go. Come on guys. It
- Seems like a kindergarten. Why
- Don't, don't you debate me, - Mr.
Chairman. What, um, the, the, the minority. I
- Mean, this is just not the place for any of this.
Now look, now I'm sure most American, myself included,
don't care much about these people or their processes
because they're all criminals.
But the point is that in general, that wasn't like that.
Of course, we should have some level of decorum.
We're supposed to pretend that this
is important stuff, right?
And the fact that they're, why don't you debate me?
Like we're have that conversation somewhere else.
You're trying to make this your podium where you stand there
and every, it's all about you guys.
They all do it. It's not just Marjorie Taylor Greene.
It's just really bad else.
- Evan Chair, og, you're not, yeah, you're not
- Order, you don't have enough intelligence.
- You're out. Order Chair recognizes Mr. Perry,
- Okay, move to strike the, those
- The ladies as one
of the dumbest people in the room, in my opinion, move
- Order - Ladies words again,
- That's two requests to strike.
That's two requests to strike.
- Oh, they cannot take the word. If
- There's another motion to strike her words again, please.
- Okay, representatives here,
here's the correct, the correct apology.
Ms. Green, do you ask unanimous?
Do you agree to unanimous consent?
God, to strike your words.
- I repeat again for the second time. Yes, I'll strike
- My words.
Well, repeating would be the second time.
, just so we all understand
how dumb that was. I'm not
- Apologizing - Without objection. Without objection.
- Not need to repeat it again.
That would be more than twice.
But you know, we'll let that slide.
- Mr. Chair Point. Oh, order.
- Who's, who's? It's me, Ms. Crockett.
- I'm just curious, just to better understand your ruling.
If someone on this committee then starts talking about
somebody's bleach, blonde, bad built butch body
that would not be engaging in personalities. Correct?
- A, a what Now - God.
Like we don't all know what that you're just using
that moment to lash back out.
Oh, what now, .
It's just people I have no respect
for literally anybody in this room.
Well, you know, maybe save for a few of the, you know,
and I, I question all of them,
but you know, like a Massey for example,
because I often agree with most of the stances he tends
to take not all, but very, very few examples
where I think these people are worthy of your respect.
Check. And by the way, since I made the point,
I'm sure somebody will go, oh,
and here's Ryan calling them stupid.
And we're, well, it's a very different thing from my
perspective and being in this conversation, like, yeah,
you can say it's petty that I can call them unintelligent,
but it's a very different reality
to be sitting in a situation where you're supposed
to be showing decorum in some kind of political dynamic
and then using that to say those things.
This is my show and my ability, I, you know, that
that's a very big difference.
- I'm, I make a, I make a motion to strike those
- Words.
I don't, I don't think that's a on part
- Of, I'm trying to find clarification on what quality
- Motion to strike those words.
I know what you just said. Obviously not,
- We're not gonna, we're not gonna do this like you guys,
- I mean, you know, and I gotta be honest though, like,
how does this happen in a situation where, I mean,
do you realize how many intelligent, well-versed
and I mean like really well versed, I don't not just,
you know, been in the field that long
and so you talk like, you know what,
it goes on in Iran, but you've never been there.
People that are really genuinely well-versed in politics
and deep politics and everything,
and that these are the people
that end up in these positions.
Some 20 something that has no idea
that would make these kind of ridiculous comments.
And I'm not even talking about her in particular, it's just
how does that even happen?
Oh, we pretend it's because democracy
and that's what you guys all wanted.
Do we really believe that still anyway,
- Earlier, literally just - Did it first voted to do it.
Y'all did it first so you don't wanna fuck about it.
Do it order.
- We're not gonna, we're not gonna do this.
Look you guys earlier, literally just
- First it did.
- I'm trying to get clarification. Look at calm
down, calm down.
No, no, no, no. Because this is what I,
allall do proceed. So I'm trying to get,
- Hey, Mr, you're not recognized Ms. Crock,
- I hear you with you yelling, don't want
down, can you please calm down?
- That's like the fifth person to
come up and whisper something to him.
What the hell is going on? Tell
- Me to calm down, calm down, y'all down
and then you control.
Because if I shit about her minutes, y'all have a
- Chairman, Mr.
- Chairman, and now she's cursing, you know, again,
who I don't really care all that much,
but it's about the decorum.
It's about the situation you're in.
And I care that this is how the world views all of us
because of how bad these people are.
- You're - Now, guys, this is just one little glimpse
if you pay attention to this stuff, which I, it's hard
to do, which is why I barely do anymore
because it's mutually meaningless
and it's chockfull of nonsense and lies and undermining it.
It's just this is, it's bad.
And it wasn't always at least this visibly bad.
So anyway, I thought that was a relevant point
to make sure we see where we really
are in this country, guys.
And it's scary, it's alarming to me
that we're in a situation where these,
at least the perception is that these are the people
that are making decisions that affect our lives.
I mean, by the first of all, not ev the, they're back
and forth and they're all screaming.
And like I said before, it's just low brow,
but then you've got the rest of them like laughing
and commenting and like it's some kind of peanut gallery.
I don't know. I, I, I think the point is made,
it just really does scare me that this is
where we're going at the very least.
That it's the way the world perceives where we are,
which is very relevant when it comes to a lot of things.
Not even just governmental dynamics.
This stuff affects our lives.
And I don't even mean voting guys in any case, I think
that's important that we understand.
As I said, we are ruled over, I should have said lorded over
by absolute children, petty small, manipulative children
with far too much power.
And the most terrifying part is when you realize
that these people are not the ones actually in control.
And I stand by that.
I'm not saying they don't have votes
and there's not some kind of overlapping power,
but we need to stand back and recognize whether it's from
the executive branch or whatever the hell we're looking at
right here, these people.
And again, whether we're talking about, if I have time
to get to it, the lobbying aspect from APAC
or any other number of things,
and I, I'm, I'm even just making it about Israel.
There's all sorts of lobbying that goes on
that these people are completely cow.
They cow to it constantly.
In fact, I think that's why they find their ways in these
positions because they know they'll line up like Pelosi
making a million dollars a day
and ultimately with nobody paying attention.
That's not what this is supposed to be.
When this started, this was a public service.
Most of the people, if not all of them, had jobs
and then they did this.
This has become a lifelong public
or a lifelong, uh, position, I guess.
And I don't even mean in whether you're in
in Senate or in the House.
I mean this is, people are
like, I mean, look at it like this.
There's plenty of people that are not even in Congress
anymore, but are on the talk shows
and they're still seen as sort of a lifelong politician.
That's just gross to me.
And that's why this is abused in so many different ways.
Exactly as Dr. Bass says in the chat, Idiocracy has arrived.
In fact, it's been here for a decade or more
and we need to be if not longer.
Well, I wanted to make sure we saw this,
which I already made a point on this
before in regard to the,
I think it was equal Health Alliance aspect
of this from the select subcommittee on Coronavirus.
And they basically made the point
that the HHS is now beginning to cease all of the funding.
I mean, it's all coming down in different ways,
but I don't think it's honest.
I don't think that it's gonna account
or end up with any real accountability.
Even let's just even say the Eco Alliance in general
and das aq and people like that go to jail.
That doesn't stop the actual government process.
And that's what I mean, what, what I think is
every dynamic, every angle of this left
and right, global aspects,
and it's not just gonna stop by remo,
it's, look at it like this.
That's like killing Epstein
and pretending like that's all it was and it's over.
And it was just one anomaly. No, no, it wasn't.
And we all know that.
This is another example of the same committee where, uh,
this was um, Congresswoman Debbie Lesko asking,
did you find, did nh,
did NIH fund gain a function research
at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
Now we know this and it says
through Equal Health, we know this question.
Fauci has smugly dismissed it multiple times going,
there's no even grandstanding back against Rand Paul making
it sound like you sir, don't know what you're talking about.
And that's when they played the whole EPPP game
and pretended like, that's what it's been.
No, you changed that like moments before the hearing.
For the most part. What's interesting about this clip,
and I, you don't need to play it for you, he,
he basically says, did you fund it?
And he says, if you're speaking about generic
term, yes we did.
He basically kind of waffles
for a second then says basically, well, okay,
it doesn't even matter whether we're talking about generic
term versus if you did gain a function in some
form, then Fauci lied.
And we all know that.
But the worst part is he goes,
but that the the term you're addressing is
not dangerous to anybody.
That's what he says. I can't even believe.
So it's, this is my point, it's about admission,
but while cementing the thing that they want to move forward
with that, well, it's not dangerous
and we're gonna keep doing it, whether we call it EPPP
or gain of function or whatever else we name it tomorrow.
And we're gonna pretend that
because of this, it's not dangerous,
but just what Fauci did was, and that is how this works.
That's why you get the breaking story
of something we've been talking about for four years
because it's con uh,
contorting it into something that works for the agenda.
So I wanted to use that to highlight
where we are in all this.
This has been going on for a very long time
and I wanted to give you a quick flashback,
think the help bot here of a clip
that I think I've played before.
But it's, this goes back to, I think it's like 20 years ago.
And the bottom line is
that they're talking about when geoengineering hadn't even
been really acknowledged, been focused on.
And the point is that the people,
there are people speaking up
and saying that it was happening
and that they were collecting what was falling.
And guess what? It was barium and aluminum
and you know, in nanoparticle form and Elsewise else.
And elsewise. Yeah. And
that's exactly what we've talked about.
I've interviewed was
before back when he was doing the work,
Patrick Roddy from Stop spraying us.com,
he tested the water almost daily from San
Francisco for years.
Every time high levels of barium, high levels of aluminum,
way beyond the safe levels, just like this clip tells you.
And nothing was ever done about it.
It just drifted backward into conspiracy theory even though
this kind of clip was played on corporate media.
And we know that this is way further than
where we are right now or than, than
where further than in this clip.
Where we are now is way further than what's in this clip's
- Found by a southwest Arkansas man.
Be part of a government test.
Well that's the question at the heart
of a phenomenon called kin trails.
Now getting widespread attention.
Well, tonight, KSA News 12 investigation reporter Jeff
Berell shows us the results
of testing we had done about what's in our skies.
- Uh, it seemed like some mornings it was just
crisscrossing the whole sky.
They were just, it was just like a giant checkerboard.
- Bill Nichols snapped several photos
of the strange clouds from his home in stamps, Arkansas.
They begin his normal contraras from a jet engine,
but do not fade away like a normal contrail.
Soon after he saw particles in the air,
- You know, 'cause we'd see it dropped
to the ground in a haze
- Nichols then noticed the material
collecting on the ground.
- This is, uh, water and stuff that I collected in bowls.
I had it set out in my backyard on my dad's pickup truck.
- KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab.
The results a high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million
more than three times the toxic level set by the EPA armed
with these lab results about the high levels
of barium found in our sample, we decided
to contact the Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality.
They told us that yes, these levels are very unusual,
but at the same time they added the caveat
that proving the source is a whole nother matter
- Baron.
They know, and this is an important part.
I mean, this overlaps with the conversation
of East Palestine Palestine and, and Norfolk Southern
and the huge story that ever,
that all the details are out about,
which shows they broke the law and nobody seems
to care about, we've covered it 55 times where they knew
that it wasn't gonna explode.
They lied to the, the, the fire volunteer fire chief.
They made him make the decision.
They blame him for doing the whole.
And it's just this disgusting reality.
I mean, it's just ongoing in every direction you look.
I mean, I was even just watching again,
this old movie called Dark Water, dark Waters,
and not that old, but about Teflon and DuPont
and how literally nothing happens to these people
and we can have movies about it
and they knowingly hurt the country
and nobody seems to care.
It's just, and I'm gonna make a point again about the 239
times that we know about that
your government has tested on you
- Is a hallmark of other chemtrail testing,
which even attracted attention from a
Los Angeles TV station.
There's already no shortage
of unclassified weather modification programs
by the government, but those who fear chemtrail, and
- By the way, just don't miss how ridiculous it is.
This is being talked about as if it's just common knowledge.
But right now, most
of the news outlets would regard this as conspiracy theory.
It's the same documentation. It's all provable.
They're just as like
as we were watching the politicians degrade, kind
of degrade into a bunch of kindergarten children.
We're also watching the media degrade into some kind
of following repeaters.
And you know, even though they've always kind
of been both those things, we're watching it get really,
really ridiculous.
And I argue it's because we are waking up more
and more to the reality of what's going on
and more people are seeing it, calling it out
and not falling for their lives anymore.
So what do they do? They get desperate.
- Those could be secret biological
or chemical testing on the public Point
to the 1977 Senate hearings in particular,
which confirmed 239 populated areas had been
contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.
- And that's even more important by the way.
And just so you know, this is the citation
that we've referenced many times despite countless screamers
acting like it's fake news.
It's, it's, it's a verifiable fact the government released
and this is the point, it only goes to the sixties.
I highly doubt that it stopped at that point, especially
as we just watched one of them biggest experiments of our,
in our human species, which was the COVID-19 illusion.
They've done this, they're still doing it.
- Later, the 1994 Rockefeller report concluded hundreds
of thousands of military personnel were also subjected
to secret biological experiments over the last 60 years.
Disgusting. But could secret testing be underway yet again?
- I'd rather it be something inert and benign.
You know, something that's, you know,
not causing any damage.
But, uh, I'd like to know what it is.
- KSLA News 12 discovered chem trails are even mentioned
by name in the initial draft
of House Bill 29 77 back in 2001 under the
Space Preservation Act.
But the military denies any such program exists.
Jeff Ferrell, KSLA News 12 reporting.
- And you know, it turns out until nine years ago,
the government had the right under US law
to conduct secret testing on the American public
under specific conditions.
Geez, only a public outcry repealed part of that law
with some exceptions.
- Yeah, but it didn't though.
And this is how it always works.
It didn't repeal anything.
All it did was cement into law their allowance
to do it when certain things are happening
or certain situations mean, which by the way, they can bend,
bend into making it mean anything anytime,
anytime, anywhere they want.
That's how this works. We've talked about it a hundred times
the idea that you can, or like War Powers Act,
the Patriot Act, any number of things where they literally,
people scream about a problem
and they go, oh, it's a problem, okay?
And they write a bill that addresses it,
but actually creates the justification for it forever.
And they go, okay, well that we solved it, right?
It's not illegal anymore, so we're not breaking the law.
The problem wasn't that you were breaking the law.
The problem was that this is not something Americans want.
So creating a law that makes it no longer illegal suits only
your interest, that's your government for you.
- Now Jeff report mentioned high levels of barium linked
to those alleged chem trails.
We wanted to find out exactly
what effects barium has on the body.
Alzheimer's. We spoke with Mark Ryan, the director
of the Poison Control Center.
Ryan tells KSLA news 12, that short term exposure can lead
to anything from stomach to chest pains.
Short, long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.
Ryan addressed concerns by Kim trail researchers
that barium could be meant to wear down
a person's immune system.
- Oh my gosh, did you hear that?
- Anything that causes ill effects on the body long term
chronically is gonna affect your, your ability, uh,
because it's just, it's constantly working on the body.
So from that aspect, yeah, that's a potential.
- There you go. Right?
So hap just so happens to work to reduce your immune system,
you know, accidentally like all
the other things they're doing to you.
What a big surprise. Now let's also not forget
that this is something that has been building
for a long time past that.
And I'm not saying we can prove
that these are in the same thing or that,
but I think it's not, it's easy
to think about the overlap if we're talking about a
long-term experimentation program using any number
of things on the population, dropping 'em from the sky,
barium, aluminum, these are nanoparticles guys.
And let's, and let's not forget by the way,
before we even go forward, what Dr.
Palevsky and plenty of others have said,
what nanoparticles do. I
- Heard earlier that there's no real concern about aluminum
because it's such a small amount
and so it really shouldn't matter.
But the kind of aluminum
that we put into vaccines is a different kind of aluminum
that we see environmentally.
This is called a nanoparticle.
And nanoparticles bind really tightly
to the bacteria antigens, the virus antigens,
the food protein antigens,
and any other contaminants that are in the vaccines
that we may not know about.
And we know that the biochemical properties
of an nanoparticles is
that they are capable of entering the brain.
And so we have not evaluated the safety
of the aluminum nanoparticle and its injection
and where it goes when it gets into the body
and whether it gets into the brain.
Do vaccine ingredients belong in the brain? No.
Do they get into the brain?
No one has ever studied it,
but animal studies using the same chemicals
that are in vaccines that we give to children
directly demonstrate that the vaccine ingredients
do enter the brain.
- Great clip. By the way, Dr.
Palevsky is someone worth following?
The important thing is to understand that these things,
things almost seem to be designed for that and either way,
and another point by the way, which I failed
to highlight in the past is
that he's talking about right there that these nanoparticles
that are in these injections or other things,
we're talking about buying very tightly
to the supposed accidental byproducts or contaminants
or the in intentional DNA contamination
or the all the things we just talked about,
which then makes sure that those
things are what enter the brain.
Not hard to see how it might be a weapon system
or accidental or deliberate, you know, I just,
I just find it impossible to even pretend like some
of this stuff is accidental with
how many times we've seen it.
But in any case, let's make sure we see
to finish this segment, that this is something
that has been, this is from 2023 wireless in the blood,
the bottom line, biological computing machines such as micro
and nano implants
or nanotech, smart dust level conversations
that can collect important information
inside the body are transforming medicine,
yet networking them for communication as proven challenging.
But guess what they just did to try to figure that out.
Now, a global team, including EPFL researchers,
has developed a protocol that enables a molecular network
with multiple transmitters.
First he says there, it says
there was the internet of things.
We've talked about this many times now at the interface
of computer science and biology.
You know, like what Klau Schwab
and the rest of 'em have told you was happening right now,
the convergence of those things, the internet
of bio nano things, promises
to revolutionize medicine, healthcare.
Yeah, well all of this is exactly what we're talking about.
The nano lipid nanoparticle, the Liber
and Langer, the Charles Lieber,
Robert Langer overlap the information.
Langer being the co-founder of Moderna,
this is their research point, is this is not hard
to see the overlap to,
and let's not forget, we just talked about this in
January 16th of this year, gain of function's,
newest brain virus.
That's interesting. Or so we're talking about something
that seems to go toward the, you know, goes to the brain.
We're talking about gain of function, you just admitted yes,
they do gain a function, which we already know.
You can see how all of this can connect
with not just the gain of function Wuhan lab,
but other things we're discussing the idea of smart dust,
the idea of geoengineering this stuff is not,
it is clearly intersecting
and it scares me the idea of what we've talked about,
the smart dust conversation, which again, I'm surprises me
how few people seem to know
that this is not an old conversation or a new conversation.
Smart dust goes back decades.
DARPA was where this originally started
from, at least we can prove.
And it goes back a long time, at least 20 years or more.
And this one used, it has been used.
It is a real concept and it is tiny flex of dust
that you cannot see that can work on your own body's energy.
If you don't think this is real, it's very clear to see.
At the very least the government claims it is you.
Very good question
to ask whether they could be lying about that.
But it's interesting to see.
Now on top of that, as we, I wanna reference the work on
that very point that was referenced in there,
and we did this in a follow up in 2020 in Coronavirus,
we trust medical surveillance state for a government
that's experimented on you 239 times
at least that we know about.
And here was the,
and this is originally a, uh,
free thought project article in, in regard, not this one,
but the, the point we make.
We reference it down here 239 times.
But the US Army has admitted to conducting hundreds
of germ warfare tests on Americans.
And this goes over that information.
It's originally from the free thought project.
It's very, very clear.
And this is just to the sixties
and we know it went well past that.
Now I'll include some other points in here
that we've discussed in the past.
This is from Nano Therapeutics.
It's an older article, nano Therapeutics.
Primary focus is to develop new inhalation, nasal
and injectable delivery systems to PR
to improve therapeutic outcomes.
Proprietary powder processing techniques are being developed
to improve delivery of traditional drugs as well
as proteins, gene therapies that cannot be taken orally.
I don't even need to highlight the overlap, do I?
I mean it's obvious that this, and this is not new.
Inhaled delivery systems are
of particular importance since there will be hundreds
of new bio-engineered drugs entering the
marketplace in the next few years.
Gee, is that what we all want?
Is that what we decided is that what even they're being,
we're being told hardly including recumbent proteins,
growth factors, cytokines,
monoclonal antibodies and antibiotics.
This is from 2002, realize
that this is not what we're being told.
This stuff's happening already. That's where we are.
This is an older article from 1994,
human Experimentation going
over the things we just discussed.
If you want the citation to prove it
for yourself here is from 2019, search into deadly viruses
and biological weapons that US Army labs shut down over
fears that they could escape.
Certainly could just be a big ruse to justify
what they released or did on purpose.
But either way, how do we pretend
that these things don't all connect into
what literally was happening from there forward.
This is 2019.
Now I just thought that was important to highlight.
Let's also include something I think is generally related
tangential, at least in regard to the great reset
and all these conversations.
Wall Street civil reports
that the digital ID has now been passed in Australia,
which just shouldn't be shocking.
It's already real in a lot of places
that just don't acknowledge that.
But this is coming, this is happening.
And I says he writes, there was their ultimate goal
with COVID-19, 15 minute cities coming.
I mean I wouldn't necessarily make those two things
to connect all the time because you don't need a digital ID
realistically to make that kind of 15 minute city reality.
But obviously they overlap.
And I think it's really about tracking, it's about control,
it's about, I mean the vaccine passport conversation.
It comes down to basically being able to lock you out
of a system, which obviously connects to the 15 minute city.
But I find it much bigger than that.
That just kind of seems to be the general focus of a lot
of the partisan perspective and it's worthy of concern.
The Gaza point, the Lena,
I mean all these different things are not
something to be dismissed.
But I wanted to make sure we saw that this is happening.
Here's Pelham highlighting that.
This is Alex car Karp, who we just recently talked about
who just admitted he's an American Jewish billionaire using
spyware to intercept phone calls from
international citizens.
Why in the world is that acceptable to any other government
that are speaking with Palestinians?
And then Palantir, his company is selling that information
to the IDF who uses it to target Goins,
which we know they've killed over 15,000 children
and their own people by the way.
So how is this a public conversation?
They're literally using an illegal access
to kill innocent people.
May maybe Alex Karp should be held accountable for that.
What do you think? And not forget,
Palantir has already agreed to work
with a strategic partnership with Israel
to develop their battle tech.
And that's come, that's lavender, that is hob Sora,
that's the AI targeted murder machine
that their own people have called out
here is Fed Scoop saying Northern command calls upon
Palantir Apple and others
to bring about new tech to fight Coronavirus.
That's 2020. Seems like Palantir is kind of essential role.
You know that Whitney and I have talked about it a lot.
I wanted to have a conversation with her soon about that.
And then on top of that, meta provides an Israeli AI system
information to target Palestinians through WhatsApp.
I mean this is everywhere.
These people are literally facilitating genocide
and letting them use their tech
to target innocent civilians.
On top of that, Giannis uh,
or uh, Eunice Toi points out something really
alarming more than all of it.
He says this is disgusting today is Israeli forces
through pamphlets over skies.
And this was the 17th of Diar Baah blackmailing Gaza
residents to reveal their criminal intent
and rec records, at least what they perceive
to be criminal intent and records held
by the Palestinian police.
If they don't cooperate with the occupation forces
and also reveal people who gave tips to them,
they will be targeted, attacked.
This is what we've been seeing.
And the point here is that this is interesting
and of course this will play into a small degree
what the kind of play is about how Israel is some kind
of bastion of peace for people in the LGBT community,
which is a shocking lie if you really look into it
and we've covered this plenty of times,
but the point is, it's supposed
to be the better place than the Palestine,
which again is not even as accurate.
They pretend it to be. But I can clearly see a difference in
the perception coming from a more strict religious mindset
on either side of the conversation.
But either case, he says here they reveal personal details.
So again, we're talking about these basically Israeli, uh,
intelligence threatening average people dropping these
saying you better inform on anybody
around you if they're doing
something they're not supposed to.
You better tell us or we're gonna deem you Hamas,
which then gets them killed even though
there's no evidence to back that up.
But it says here they reveal personal details
of a Palestinian who happens
to be in the LGBT community who's gay or something like that
and reveal his personal details to the public.
Now it says the guy probably refused to cooperate
with the Israeli military so they outed him,
but whatever it is, if your argument is
that they're not safe in Palestine
and then you out him to the Palestinians,
how in the world is that supposed to be something?
That's how it shows you what the Israeli government is.
And of course the Palestinians and the Zion
or rather the pro Zionist, pro-Israeli entities
that are lying about everything are gonna say, yeah,
he deserves it even though
otherwise they would argue that this is why Israel's better.
Because I mean, how do you make sense of that?
It only shows you the depravity, the kind
of disgusting hatred they have for people even
as they pretend they're fighting for these kind
of uh, concepts.
But on top of that, it says they have a search engine over
the Palestinian Civil Registry in Gaza
that any resident can search up using his ID
to see if someone gave tips on him and who at who
and whom it says, let's say their details.
So let's say someone stole,
he says did an illegal act, et cetera.
They now are revealing all of his files
and it says you have, if you have ever told the Palestinian
police anything against any people
that you suspect have committed a crime, they will out you
and label you as a Hamas informant.
You see how broad that is? It be.
That's why that's because they've argued
that any policeman is suddenly Hamas,
even though the US government spoke up
and said, Hey, stop killing the policemen
that are trying to guard the aid.
They're not Hamas, they keep making the argument they are
because to them literally everybody is Hamas.
And again, don't forget that's
because they made sure Hamas would be in power
to keep the division between the West Bank and Gaza.
Its Netanyahu's own statements in the laud meeting from 2019
that Hertz covered, which shows you
that they made sure they would be in power
and that mean that everybody their forward had to work
through the facilities of Hamas, which then labeled them
as Hamas collaborators through Israel's perspective.
That's intentional. So they were all Hamas.
My point is they're creating a situation
where they're telling you tell on your neighbor
or make something up and if you don't,
we're gonna label you as Hamas.
It's one more way to make everybody
Hamas no matter what actually happens.
Now I wanna make sure we solve this
because I just think it's important to follow up.
We just covered this Hamas claims,
and by the way, it's funny, the guy
that I was talking about the other day
who was screeching about how I secretly hate Jewish people,
even though it's just one of the most absurd, somebody
who was doing good work in Covid I thought made me very sad.
My point is, I went through this
and the argument is Hamas claims is real bombed IDF troops
under Hannibal directive.
Now to forget Ryan Grim was the one
that was reporting on what they claimed.
Israel then reported that it actually happened, not
that they bombed their own people, but that the people died.
So you can clearly see the story is real,
but the narratives around that are spinning.
And I said explicitly in this show, you should question
what Hamas says just as much
as you question what Israel says.
Of course, the person who didn't watch this
and reads the headline goes eating all
of the Hamas propaganda,
I'm just embarrassed for these people.
They just have either a blind spot
for anything Israel related
or they're been dishonest about everything.
We should really be asking these questions.
The point is, it's like for them to say
that you're gonna repeat
or report anything Israel says as what is all the media does
that Israel claims X, Y, and Z.
Suddenly that's okay, but I'm not allowed
to say Hamas claims something
by while including we should be very skeptical
of any claim from any side.
You know, it's just, it's just sad.
You obviously an objective person can see a
one-sided concept right there.
We should be reporting what any side says
and I often report what Israel claims,
but of course I fill in the gaps with the fact
that they've been caught lying 45 times
right up until that point.
But we should still consider it.
I just think it's important to recognize
how people are being dishonest and,
and not in, in many of them, not even intentionally.
They just don't see that they're blind to this conversation.
But I think that's a minority.
But in any case, the point was we just talked about the fact
that the UN did not have the death toll.
It's still the reality and it's a shocking
and it's shockingly easy to see if you just look
for yourself and of course read this important article
Robert put out that just breaks this down.
We wrote it together technically.
Well, I added a large enough section
where he wanted me to put my name on it.
The point was that we both put this out
and it's very, very, very, very clear.
It's obvious they're lying,
but here is Jeffrey Mead, tripling down is one
of the many people I highlighted the other day
and he just, this is from two days ago
after that broke that they were lying after the UN came out
and said, no, we did not do that.
He goes back to it really trying to push in.
The main thing that that becomes the, the general lie
that's being pushed, which is we're past the idea.
They haved it. We're pretending that we never said that.
All we're trying to say is, look, can't you see
that the number of children and women are halved?
And that means that if you add up the rest of it
that there's no way that could be.
It's simple guys. It's not hard to recognize, as we said
before, all they've done is added an identified number,
which means the remainder are unidentifiable,
which means they're so mutilated
or something else in that regard
that they can't identify whether they're a woman or a child
or the point is that people are highlighting the fact
that there's just no way the rest
of what's there could be mostly women and children.
How is that part? I mean, there's no way.
You mean aside from the obvious reality,
this is a war on women and children,
that they're targeting women
and children, that they killed more women
and children than any concept we could talk.
Obviously it makes sense.
The point is that 34,844 as
of the 30th was still the full number.
They just showed you a breakdown in
between there showing
these are the ones that are identified.
So the number of women and children also did not change
and the un made that clear.
But all they can do is keep screaming about how
after the calculations that number dropped at 51.
Well, no, all you're adding is the numbers
that are in the identified category.
The others are unidentified
and that's been made clear 55 times.
It just shocking to me.
And I said, are you seriously incapable of recognizing
that the number you're pretending is now the total amount
of women and children killed is actually just the portion
of the total that is now differentiated as identified.
The remainder are just unidentifiable.
And on top of that, ask yourself how crazy it is
that these people, it's somehow they think a winning
argument to say, look, we win
because they only killed 7,000 children.
Like think about dying on that hill.
So you're, so you're okay with that?
You think 7,000 dead children in the process
of seven months is somehow the win for you?
My God, I just can't get past how bad all this is.
Now let's get down, I think I've got about 15,
20 minutes left.
I wanna make sure we at least get to the ICJ
and a couple important points about the protest.
Now this is just Dr
who is highlighting that they, you know,
the opening segment which shows that Israel only had look,
so that's the South African side.
Israel only brought three people.
Look how many chairs there are available. They're full.
Okay? This is a monumentally big situation.
I mean it's huge and they must know
that this is coming down on top of them.
And they send three people the ICJ emergency hearing,
Israel's blatant contempt on, on full display.
South Africa tends enforce while Israel sends a mere
three representatives.
And of course South Africa's presenting evidence.
Israel's actions wreak of utter disrespect for the ICJ.
Well, they've made that shockingly clear.
Here's the opening statement,
delivers a powerful opening statement
and this is, you know, south African side
and I'll let you play for, I'll play it for itself. Now,
- Since that request was made,
it has become increasingly clear
that Israel's actions in Raha are part of the end game
in which Gaza is utterly destroyed as an area capable
of human habitation.
This is the last step in the destruction of Gaza
and its Palestinian people.
It was rougher that brought South Africa to the court,
but it is all Palestinians as a national ethnical
and racial group who need the protection from genocide
that the court can order.
We've heard boasts
that Israel's army is the most moral army in history.
- That's - Crazy. And we've heard denials
that there is famine in gata for months.
People, particularly in the West, have appeared unwilling
to accept that the accusations are true.
How could people who look like us
and sound like us possibly engage in anything
like genocide?
But the evidence has to be faced.
My colleagues will take you to that evidence,
including evidence of continued bombings
attacks on people in so-called safe areas
to which they've been directed by Israel
attacks on aid convoys and of mass graves
and the horrors of which the corpses speak.
- Hmm, man. So the, the real important thing here guys, is
that it seems to me that this is going forward.
I I I'm still skeptical about where it will end up,
but I don't know how, if you, if you, if they've continued
to follow up with additional information from what's
happened since they originally presented their scathing
and very clear information that showed
that it was plausible, they recommending genocide.
They've followed up what they've done in Rafa,
I mean, what they're discussing, right?
You just heard, I mean the opening statement that the,
the starvation, they, I mean all
of this stuff has been documented.
So I'm, I'm hopeful that this is going
to go in a positive direction.
Now also realize that even if it ends up where they're like,
yes, this is genocide, we rule unequivocally that happened,
remember that this is still the responsibility
of the security council in the UN to do something about it.
And that's still completely
controlled by Israel United States.
So it's still a win mind you,
even if there's no legal accountability.
But that will break my heart to see
that these people don't go to prison
because of all the things that they've done.
But the win will still be that this is going
to be cemented in public opinion.
I mean it's al I it's already happened.
Let's be very honest about that.
Even Israel's mainstream media
and they, it's, they've admitted this
as they said, we've already lost.
We have to admit that that's a Hart's article they wrote
and it's been acknowledged by their own people.
They want the, we, I, I'm not gonna break off on a lot of it
'cause I wanna save the time, but I
believe that this is gonna end that way.
And so remember that that can still be used to force action.
But I'm not hopeful that the UN will, you know,
through the control of the UN and US
and Israel will actually end up in a positive way.
But here is one of the other
presentations, and I'll leave it there.
This is from Stephen Don Zinger pointing out stunning
presentations today by superstar lawyer Adla Hasim at the
World Court in support of the genocide case against Israel.
Israel's killing of 14,000 children, plus is a quote,
deliberate snuffing out of Palestinian life.
Statements like that from these people.
It's, it's, it's, I find it hard to believe
that it will end up with nothing.
You know, this puts their reputations in the line.
If you're gonna stand up and say that there's nothing out
life in Palestine, and then rule,
they're not committing genocide.
I don't know how you ever recover from that, from a matter
of respect and, and reputation.
So that's why I believe this is going
to end up against Israel,
which I think is the public opinion at this point.
That's what the world wants. Even many governments.
So I don't know how they get away from it.
- Gaza's children have suffered particularly severely,
more than 14,000 have been killed.
Thousands more have been injured or lost family members.
- I kind of feel like she sounds
like she's trolling back crying.
But I mean, I could be wrong. I don't, I, I've usually,
I these people have, you know, pretty strong decorum.
But it's hard, it's an easy thing to understand.
That's a lot of death. And they've
been combing through this.
- While an estimated 17,000 children are unaccompanied
or separated,
nearly all of Gaza's children have been exposed
to traumatic experiences, the consequences of which
will last a lifetime.
Make no mistake,
these conditions are a direct result
of Israel's military onslaught on the besieged enclave
with full knowledge of the destructive consequences
of this humanitarian crisis.
- And, and my, I can,
I can't even believe this is not
being covered by the corporate media.
I mean, even if you pretend this is, I mean,
how do you even ignore this?
Like, this isn't even about the ha verse Hamas verse.
This is just breaking down from a legal
perspective what they've done.
And this is, I've even seen a single covering point
of this barely, even when it first actually happened,
which was a monumental, an earth shattering moment.
And still, and by the way, some, uh, who those
that watch this in the chat are saying
that she apparently did cry.
I mean, that's a big, to me that means a lot.
These are people that go through some,
some very serious things.
They go through this kind of stuff,
and if to reach them to that level, I mean, that's
how bad this is.
I don't know how anybody can comb through this stuff
and not walk away being changed
- In these circumstances, in these circumstances.
The sorting of humanitarian aid. Mm-Hmm.
cannot be seen as anything
but the deliberate snuffing out of Palestinian lives, right?
Starvation to the point of famine,
obstructing aid in the face of famine
and killing of at least 200 aid workers.
- That's so crazy. - For the court's previous orders
to be effective for the provision of humanitarian aid
urgently, and that scale, Israel has to be ordered
to stop Its military offensive.
- See, that's the crazy part though.
That's already happened, right?
I mean, from the ICJ from the United Nations,
they just don't care.
Which, I mean, that's, it's what,
that's like the 57th UN resolution.
They just flat out ignore. I'm, I'm pulling that number out.
I I think it's somewhere accurate actually.
But I mean, I don't quote me on that exact number.
But the point is there's a lot,
and I'm, the reason I'm highlighting that, I think
that's generally where it was last time I checked somebody
reporting on how many UN resolutions.
But for all I know, it's more than that.
The bottom line is, it's not hard to see
how they routinely disregard the ruling
if it goes against what they want.
The US does the same damn thing
and they, yet, they somehow
have veto power over what happens.
I mean, that shows overwhelming corruption.
Now, on top of that, let's just quickly go
through some of these points that you should see.
Here's Unis Tara pointing out South Africa.
South Africa actually quoted the tweet
that he highlights here at the ICJ.
We've already shown you this as intent to genocide.
One of the many countless examples here is SMO Rich, one
of the most wildly extreme moments before redemption.
We must not hesitate.
We must destroy Rafa NRA Dalala,
wipe out the memory of Alek.
Don't forget what that means.
They've already used that in the earlier presentation
to highlight that their genocidal, and he uses it again
because it's important to them.
It's biblical in their minds.
And he is highlighting the idea that they need
to kill every man, woman, and child.
That's what that means. He says there's no half measure Rafa
nra, absolute destruction.
They quoted this in their presentation. Thank you.
We are all Palestine for highlighting that for me.
Now, Alonzo Grundy points out something interesting.
He just simply goes, wait, let me get this straight.
The guy who banned pro-Palestine NGOs in Israel boasted
about sending Gaza back to the stone Age
and called the starvation of 2 million people, quote,
Israel's second war of independence, is this the moderate
who will save Israeli democracy from fanatics?
Yeah, that's supposedly the person we're talking about.
Here he is right here. Oops.
Oh, it doesn't, of course it doesn't gonna be translating,
but it's his diplomatic desk reporter.
Here he is, what he says, Ganz goals plan.
Oh, and for, here's Ganz,
by the way we're talking about the report.
It says the, the to return home are abductees.
These are their goals. The topple, the rule of Hamas annex
that Gaza s strip and ensure Israeli security control annex,
you mean the place that you already control
and occupy, like these are political word games guys, along
with maintaining Israeli security control,
established an American,
European Arab Palestinian administration that will sit, uh,
that will civilian manage the strip
and lay the foundation for the future alternative
that is not Hamas or, uh,
or ABAs pa return the residents to north.
I mean, you can see this is everything.
Remember in the beginning when we highlighted exactly
where this was gonna go, and they called you,
they called it blood libel.
It's just grotesque how obvious it is
and how the power structures, many
of them in the world act like you're wrong.
When they know and are involved with what's happening,
these people are screaming exactly
what they pretend isn't happening.
How is it possible that we have the people like Matt Miller
and Viel in the US government pretending
that we're still not a crime, has been committed?
Matt Orel highlights this old discussion from,
I believe it was 2022.
2021, a foreign country bombed the offices
of a major US press outlet accused it without evidence
of harboring sound familiar.
And a significant portion of the US media spun the story
to support the foreign country.
Can you guess what country that was?
The IDF gave the tenants of the ALJ law building in Gaza,
which included Associated Press, by the way,
other news agencies and Al Jazeera
and residential homes, one hour
to evacuate before bombing the building.
How is it possible that and is a 60 minutes
and three Israeli missiles later?
Here's the building a press building,
including foreign international journalism,
says the C AP CEO.
Gary Pruitt said the news agency was in
the building for 15 years.
And quote, we have had no
indication who MAs was in the building.
Of course this should be
relevant to what we're talking about today.
This is the common practice.
And don't forget, we just highlighted
that Israel bombed an Iranian embassy,
the consulate building that was connected to the embassy,
which was part of the embassy.
This is what they do. Nobody seemed to care.
The corporate media completely gaslit people into
thinking it was allowed to happen.
And Derek followed up highlighting that at right
after that, don't forget, you saw a rating of the Mexican
embassy in regarding, uh,
I think it was Nicaragua if I remember correctly.
Basically the point was you saw this bleed into other
discussions where they said, okay,
well vis Israel can do it, we'll do it too.
Violating the norms.
Now, in regard to the aid being blocked,
KUDs news highlights that
during the South African hearing it was mentioned
that they usted the settlers are blocking aid
because that's what's happening.
And everyone can see it.
It's being backed by the Israeli government.
You've got usually IDF members
that are there protecting them
and keeping them secure, backed by the Israeli government.
And here's the video of them continuing
to break the a break, you know, stop the aid trucks,
throw the aid on the ground, destroy it, even though,
by the way, that means they're starving.
The hostages too.
Here in this video, you can see footage of attempts
to block all aid trucks.
Even though Elon Levy will scream,
they're getting more than ever from a CEO of be Almo,
a right wing NGO, who calls Israelis to join those crimes.
So you have an NGO, uh, uh, be almo
and the CEO of this company, who's supposed to be the,
you know, NGOs arguably are, you know,
they present themselves as humanitarian half the time,
and they're there stopping humanitarian aid
to both hostages, who Israeli American and Britain
and other places, as well as all Palestinians,
while they're in a famine situation.
Glick recently received an award for his activism
during the current war from the Israeli parliament.
And they are proudly blocking and destroying aid.
Look at this, look at what they're doing.
This is on full display for the world. It makes me sick.
And here's the one, I'll just include this for you to watch.
'cause we just referenced this. This is the, uh,
human rights lawyer attacked.
She was hit in the face while she was trying
to stop them from destroying the food aid.
And here's an example of one of these children.
This is not just from starving from food.
There's a couple of things that happened here.
That's what he looked like before.
Here's what it looks like now.
Now, as I understand it, he's starving, but it's also
because of some smoke he inhaled be
after one of their totally non-violent thing with their,
their smoke, the gas, uh, what do they call 'em?
Smoke grenades or, or, um, what's the word I'm looking for?
Any case. The point is, we've talked about this many times.
They act like they're using this,
you know, crowd dispersion.
They use it on the Palestinian protest, the march of return.
People would die from this stuff.
People go into seizures, they would act like
they would never recover.
These are chemical or biological weapons,
and yet nobody seems to care about that.
Abby Martin has covered this.
So this kid inhaled some of the smoke from one
of these things and he's never been the same.
And he's starving. Suppressed news highlights,
uh, lemme see how much time we have.
I'll play this real quick. This is just
a clip that he highlights.
I, I'm not sure who I, I've referenced this person before.
I forget his name. He's, he did this little clip here.
He's simply highlighting every ceasefire deal
and prisoner exchange that Hamas has offered Israel since
the seventh, which they've refused every single time while
screaming Hamas is the one that doesn't want it.
- Here's every ceasefire deal
and prisoner exchange
that Hamas has offered Israel since
October 7th, October 9th.
Hamas offers Israel an unspecified number of women
and children being held hostage in Gaza, in exchange
for 36 Palestinian women
and children being held hostage in Israeli prisons.
October 16th, a Hamas official says,
free all Israeli captives in Gaza in exchange
for 6,000 Palestinian captives in Israel.
October 17th, a Hamas official tells NBC news
that they'd release all of their Israeli civilian captives.
All if Israel agreed to stop bombing Gaza,
- All that's the most important one.
They, they already offered.
We will release every single person we have.
If you just stop bombing all the civilians
or anywhere in Gaza.
Now you could pretend that, well, we can't do that
because then the Hamas will still be,
that's the radical saying that every, I mean,
I mean literally the entire conversation from Israel right
now, and they're protestors threatening
to burn Israel down if they don't accept whatever
deal Hamas offers at this point.
And that's not because they care about Palestinians.
In most cases, that's clear. But they already made the CL
we're argument, no matter what the dynamic, we want you
to accept that we want our families back.
And they still say no.
And at this point, they were pretending
that Hamas had not offered anything.
That's because they lie about everything.
- October 28th, Hamas' leader in Gaza offers to release all
of the Israeli captives in Gaza in exchange
for all the Palestinian captives in Israeli prisons. There
- You go.
Another important one.
Well, fine then just give us back our prisoners,
which was arguably the main point of all this.
And they still said no. And that was
before they got forced to accept the pause.
So this was a game and they made sure
that they made it look like Hamas was doing all of it.
Just like every other circumstance.
Now, based on time, I'll let all you guys can watch
the rest of that for yourselves.
Here's an important point, getting into the votes.
This just makes me sick, Brian.
This is, this is a person who's acting
actively in the interest of a foreign country.
A against the interest of Americans, who literally is,
has an IDF uniform as he's part of a foreign military
and is acting like he's an American representative.
House Republicans just voted
to end Joe Biden's arms embargo,
which wasn't even what was happening.
So first and foremost, think about how gross it is
that you have Republicans voting to maintain arming
of a clear genocide.
That's complicity, guys,
that's literally legally accountable.
Those people can go to jail. But on top of that,
that's not even what's happening.
Joe Biden is not an arms embargo.
They paused one shipment, which
by the way was still happening, that they've
and other, many of the other ones didn't even get paused.
And on top of that, even if they stopped all their
shipments, we know they can still deliver weapons
that we can't even see that go through channels
that we don't even have accountability for.
So either way, it's all a big show
of we're on the good guy side,
we're fighting against Joe Biden.
It's all an illusion. Your government is supporting Israel.
He says, we stand shoulder to shoulder with our allies,
which aren't you, by the way, as American people.
And he says on the throats of terrorists, which by the way,
he means Palestinian children.
Now it's time for the Senate Democrats to prove the same.
That's your two party illusion game.
But I said they just voted
to openly support the Gaza genocide.
Maybe Brian was wearing his IDF uniform when he decided
to act in the interest of a foreign government at the
expense of Americans, in fact, ignoring
what the vast majority of Americans want.
Hashtag Brian Mass is Israel first.
Now this is getting into the APAC point.
Now, I wanted to play one thing about the protest,
so I'm gonna go ahead and skip this and come back to it.
But APAC was busted smuggling cash
to a pro-Israel candidate.
These are not lobbyists guys.
This is straight up bribery, which is
what lobbying is anyway, but the fact
that they're doing stuff like this,
this is what you think it is.
This is direct influence
of politicians against interest of Americans.
These are crimes. Thomas Massey highlights
how they put out a 300,000 hit dollar hit piece on him
because he was calling this stuff out.
How do you not see how alarming that is?
We're talking about APAC here.
APAC comes out and tweets this being
pro-Israel is good policy.
I wonder why 52 out
of 52 APAC endorsed Democrats have won.
We're talking about Democrats, guys, not Republicans.
How in the world do you think that makes sense?
If every single person that they endorse
and give money to happens to win?
That's overwhelmingly clear influence on policy
and politicians in this country from a foreign entity.
'cause that's what they are. Ted Cruz comes out
and says, Chinese and Cuban communists are funding
anti-ISIS Israel protests.
Of course. Now look,
I'm not even gonna say for all I know they are.
The point is, it's absurd to argue that other countries
that are funding, he's framing it as communists,
which probably is the case in some cases.
And plenty of these kids are showing themselves
to be pro-communist.
But in any case, that is the partisanship
that is hiding the reality of what's really happening here.
If you care more about the pink hair they're wearing
and the claims of what they believe in than what's actually
being highlighted and what they're truly fighting for,
and the fact that the Palestinians, they're,
they're fighting for are predominantly conservative
and very clearly pushed back on the COVID-19 conversation,
then you're being used.
The point is he's going Chinese
and Cubans, well, let's put it this way,
if the other countries are funding this, that's ultimately,
in my opinion, people that are supporting the resistance
against this because it interests
them against the US government.
That's not the same as them infiltrating our country,
which is what Israel does on a daily basis.
And I wouldn't put it past any other country to do the same.
But this is a person who is actively fighting against your
interest, who has made almost a one point more than
$1.5 million from the and from apac.
How do we not think that makes a difference?
And Pam Pompeo standing up
and literally highlighting these people are all leaning
into the religious divide.
I mean, all of this stuff. And Ben Shapiro comes out
and highlights this as his regards says, don't assume
that Israel will, uh,
or either, uh, Erdogan said, don't assume
that Israel will stop in Gaza.
If not, stop this rogue state.
This terror state will sooner
or later set its sights on Turkey.
It's interesting, right? And as NATO ally,
since we've always highlighted the fact that Israel
and the United States will scream and screech
and freak out about the fact that Iran
is gonna take over the world,
that Russia's gonna take over the world
that anybody they don't like is gonna take over the world,
even though there's really zero evidence to suggest any of
that will happen, certainly could.
But the point is that I don't see them marching
around the world occupying countries
and taking what they want with no, no justification.
I don't see them doing all the things
that you guys do on a regular basis, like the Oav movement,
for example, who you're funding both Israel
and the United States who openly say they're going
to take over countries
and spread the white race around the world
after they get done with Russia.
That's not what Russia's saying,
but all they do is point to their enemies while allowing
and funding the ones that actually have that mindset,
including Israel.
And Ben goes L-M-F-A-O, you know, laugh, pretty sure
Biblical promised Land eight in Turkey.
My dude, you're not cool, dude, stop doing that.
But here's the point. Propaganda Co.
Who you should follow says Ben. Ben, Ben .
I mean, look, we just highlighted
how Smoke Rich gave an entire speech
with the greater Israel logo
right on the front of the podium.
It's not a secret. It is an important
and real provable conversation, which includes the fact
that Israel has designs for Saudi Arabia, for Egypt,
for all over the place, for Syria, for Lebanon, for Iraq.
And yes, part of Turkey. Does he not know that?
Is he just that much of a dishonest person?
That's crazy to me.
And on top of that, I posted something about that.
And the guy that we recently talked
about, what's his name again?
Josh GCal or whatever, simply highlighted this
and saying that I was eating up Hamas propaganda.
And my point is, how in the world are people either
that dishonest or that bad at research
that you're gonna pretend the Greater
Israel project is not real.
It is a provable sco.
They've had entire conversations about it.
They have openly pointed to what they wanna accomplish.
That is the real problem.
And here's that discussion, if you'd like to read it,
A great article from Matt ett, the Greater Israel Scheme,
and it's a global power play,
a delusional recipe for Armageddon.
Last points we're gonna make,
I'm gonna highlight this speech he just gave,
and this is, you know, Paul, uh, um, prominent some degree,
uh, actor, comedian.
I just want you to see that it's interesting to me.
That doesn't mean we should blindly fall into this
because usually when I see mainstream endorsement, I'm,
and I am now, I'm skeptical about if
this is some other play.
I genuinely think, and I I'm gonna be,
I'm questioning this the whole way,
right up this moment, this included.
But I, I feel that this is people
that are picking up on the real change
and they're deviating, in my opinion, for
what the mainstream is doing.
And he's highlighting the fact that he's standing
with this protest and fighting against the angst,
the interest of Israel.
If we can't recognize that the interest of Israel is
as mainstream as it gets and realize that these are people
that are bucking that system to say this, you know,
and again, maybe I'm wrong, consider that,
but listen to what he has to say
- The record straight.
No one's talk for me.
Stop weaponizing antisemitism as a self-loving Jew.
Let me just say permanent ceasefire. End to see John Gaza.
Let Gaza live impeach Netanyahu.
Fuck Raytheon, fuck Lockheed Martin, Jewish
and Palestinian safety intertwined.
Not in my fucking name. Send them home.
You do not need to hunt off people's water
supply in the name of Jewish safety.
You do not need to bomb universities, bomb hospitals,
bomb ambulances in the name of Jewish safety.
You do not need to bomb children in the name
of Jewish safety free Gucci Man.
Free busey. Free Gaza. You can donate here.
You can donate@unrwa.org.
- Yeah, I'll leave. The point is he just, you know, a ask,
you know, he's clearly supporting this,
so think what you want about it.
I think it's fascinating
that we're seeing this deviation from what they're pushing.
Now. Lastly, I just wanna play this
and I think I've got enough time, but
I'm gonna have to take off.
Glenn Greenwald did a really great breakdown.
It's interesting because it's of, it's of this
what they claimed an anti-Semitic walkout.
'cause j Jerry Seinfeld's wife apparently is like completely
immersed in this entire conversation
of funding and manipulating.
I mean, it's, it's horrifying that the people like this
who have these big public faces are shockingly immersed
with supporting genocide right now.
And the point is that he makes this great breakdown
of the campus protests and everything else.
And I think I'm just gonna end with this.
I also want you to see the UCLA counter protest got bloody,
this is our CNN investigation shows
who was actually behind the violence.
Guess who, the people
that were fighting against the Palestinian protest.
That's how this continues to be shown,
and that's what Glenn Green MA will highlight very clearly.
Ranya collect points out that the group
of pro-Israel billionaires have a WhatsApp group
where they're coordinating how to influence the US response,
including pressuring Eric Adams,
the NYPD against Columbia students.
Apparently they got found out that they had this group,
and they called it antisemitic, that we pointed it out.
I mean, it's alarmingly obvious.
Business tightens, privately urged NYC to police Columbia.
This is terrifying.
These are foreign interests that are influencing Americans
and against their, against their constitutional rights.
And you can read this more about it right here.
Now, we'll end with this in general.
I'm gonna play this clip. Make sure you watch this.
This is important. I'm gonna leave it there,
make sure this is actually the one.
Okay, good. I'm gonna leave it there guys.
Now I ultimately see, I,
I definitely can break things down a shorter period of time,
but it's hard because I definitely enjoy,
and I think people appreciate the deeper
dives on these conversations.
The, the, you know, even though I speak fast,
even when I'm taking a long time, that we take time
to fully flush these out
and understand the deeper points around it.
But I, I, I guess I feel like that's lost in a lot
of people today, unfortunately.
But we're trying to change that, right?
I don't wanna fall into the TikTok Twitter mindset
where it's about shorter and truncated in time
and just the surface level points
because I think that's the wrong direction.
I really do. But in any case, we'll leave it there.
Thank you for tuning in.
I will be probably in the next couple of days,
I keep saying this, but I believe we're pretty much back
to our regular schedule and I will be following up
with some more information, some
more views for you guys here.
But thank you for all your support guys.
I couldn't do any of this without you.
So thank you for being here. I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
- As we have covered frequently on this show.
There has been an attempt over the last several months,
really since October 7th, to convince American citizens
that the United States is drowning in racism
and bigotry against one particular minority group,
which is American Jews.
They have tried to convince these same people,
American Jews, that the United States is not safe for them.
They can't walk outside, they can't send their kids
to school, they can't send their kids to college.
There are roving bands
of Jew haters all over the place ready to mall
and violently attack American Jews.
Even though none of that has happened.
Even though essentially every encampment
of pro-Palestinian protestors at colleges had been peaceful,
not overwhelmingly peaceful in the sense that CNN
described the Black Lives Matter movement as being.
While in the background there were buildings burning,
but actually entirely peaceful.
There have been no incidents
of Jewish students being physically assaulted
or violently attacked, let alone killed.
The only real violence in any
of these protest movements came from
the pro-Israel counter protestors, most
of whom did not even go to the school there
who showed up at ECLU, at UCLA
and began violently attacking pro-Palestinian protestors,
including old women and all kinds of people throwing metal,
uh, metal fences at them, bringing sticks there,
fighting them physically for hours.
And a big part of the funding
for those pro-Israel protestors came from
Jerry Seinfeld's wife.
While Jerry Seinfeld has long been one
of the country's most vocal supporters of Israel,
and since October 7th has repeatedly
defended the Israeli war in Gaza,
condemned pro-Palestinian protestors talked about
how heroic he finds Barry Weiss.
He went to one of Barry Weiss's events about the importance
of combating antisemitism in the United States
and about the need to support Israel and its war.
Jerry Seinfeld was selected to be the commencement speaker
at the graduation ceremony
for Duke University over the weekend
where he also received an honorary degree.
And as CBS news reported yesterday, quote,
duke University graduates walked out ahead
of Jerry Seinfeld's commencement address
and there were actually a lot of booing.
Quote, duke University President Vincent.
Price's introduction to Seinfeld was drowned out
by some people chanting, quote, free Palestine,
while others shouted Jerry Jerry, the 70-year-old Seinfeld
who has supported Israel since the October 7th attack
by Hamas militants recently sparked controversy over his
comments on what remains acceptable fodder for comedy today.
Here is a video of some of the students
not attacking Jerry Seinfeld,
not violently attacking anybody,
but using their free speech rights to protest
and chant as they walked out of the speech.
They didn't try and disrupt it. They didn't try and stop it.
They didn't scream over it.
He just left in protest
of Jerry Seinfeld's position on Israel.
- Jerry is also serving as our commencement
- Speaker.
There you can see students walking out carrying a
Palestinian flag or just filing out peacefully
while the students who wanted to remain remained.
It was just a very peaceful, tranquil protest
that didn't infringe on anybody's rights.
And that is the kind of protest that
the United States has long had
that the Constitution is designed to protect.
And yet one of the tactics
that Israel's most devoted loyalists
have been using is trying to claim that any criticism
of Israel or its war is really motivated
by racism and bigotry.
They scream and screech racist and bigot
and tie somebody, anyone who disagrees with them.
They try to get people fired from their jobs
and have succeeded in media and academia
and elsewhere for criticizing Israel.
They want censorship on college campuses
and in the United States to protect this one minority group
by claiming they're not safe.
That the speech
that people are expressing about Israel is actually a form
of violence that makes Jewish people feel
unsafe and attacked.
The whole familiar script
that the American right has spent a decade mocking
and denouncing when coming from every other group is now
emanating from Israel's most devoted loyalist.
And one of the tactics they attempted to promote was
to claim that the reason Duke students
protested Jerry Seinfeld and walked out is
because Jerry Seinfeld is Jewish
and they're just anti-Semites.
And that's the proof. Here's the same
Congressman Daniel Goldman from Manhattan,
the billionaire Air to the Levi Straus fortune on May 12th,
who said the following quote,
Jerry Seinfeld is a Jewish American who has nothing at all
to do with Israel's foreign policy
or military defense holding an American Jew responsible
for the actions of the Israeli government is quintessential
antisemitism and their are all kinds of claims like that.
Now, the lie of this claim is manifest.
And the reason I think it's important to examine is
because this is the fraud
that has been going on in the United States for many months.
Obviously, the protestors were not protesting Jerry Seinfeld
because he's Jewish.
Within these protest movements, there are many Jews
who are regarded as the comrades of the protest movement
because they share it, they help
organize it, they help lead it.
There's an exhibit within the Columbia encampment
about the evils and dangers of antisemitism.
The reason they protested Jerry Seinfeld is
because Jerry Seinfeld is one of the most vocal supporters
of the Israeli war in Gaza, which is
what this protest movement is designed to denounce.
Dan Goldman absolutely lied when he said, oh,
Jerry Seinfeld is just some random American Jew, has nothing
to do with Israel of the war.
He's been vocally supporting it
and his wife using Jerry Seinfeld's money
financed pro pro-Israel activities all
over the country, including helping docs pro-Palestinian
students and financing the pro-Israel counter protestors
showed up at UCLA
and violently attacked the pro-Palestinian protestors.
But the tactic of Israel supporters is
and always has been to scream racist
and anti-Semite at anybody who disagrees
with them about Israel, at anyone who criticized Israel.
And so that became the tactic.
Now, just to illustrate the point,
protestors pro-Palestinian protestors have been outside
of the home of Nancy Pelosi
almost every day since October 7th, here from
the local Fox affiliate in San Francisco.
Quote, protesters gather outside the home of Nancy Pelosi
to raise awareness about violence and Gaza.
I'm quite certain Nancy Pelosi's not Jewish.
The reason they're protesting Nancy Pelosi is the same
reason they're protesting Jerry Seinfeld.
It's because they're supporters of the war
that these protestors are denouncing.
These protestors have been following Joe Biden around
and disrupting and protesting every one
of his events for seven months.
And I'm also quite certain that Joe Biden is not Jewish.
But what he has in common with Jerry Seinfeld
and Nancy Pelosi is that he is a vehement supporter
of an enabler of the Israeli war in Gaza.
Here's the LA Times on October 19th, quote,
no war crimes in our name, Jewish protestors say
outside Kamala Harris's la home.
So there you have Jewish protestors going
to Kamala Harris's home, a supporter
of the Israeli War in Gaza and protesting at her home.
I'm pretty sure she's not Jewish either.
Do you see the fraudulent narrative
that's being perpetrated here over and over
and over by Israel LOAs in the United States trying to claim
that anybody who questions this foreign government
who opposes us financing
of this foreign government is an anti-Semite, even though
doesn't take much effort at all to see
that the reason they're protesting people like Jerry
Seinfeld, Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris
and Joe Biden is not because of their ethnic background
or their race or their religion, but
because of their stance on the Israeli warrant in Gaza.
I think false racism accusations, false bigotry,
accusations, moral panics, trying to convince American Jews
that they're unsafe in the United States, all as a means of
demeaning and banning and rendering evil
and taboo criticism of this foreign government
are always things that need to be opposed,
and I have rarely seen such a transparent fraud
of perpetrating a narrative of racism in the United States
for alternative and ulterior means,
as I've seen since October 7th in the United States.
Thanks for watching this clip from System Update our live
show that is every Monday
through Friday at 7:00 PM Eastern exclusively on Rumble.
You can catch the full nightly shows live,
or view the backlog of episodes for free on our Rumble page.
You can also find full episodes the morning
after they air across all major podcasting platforms,
including Spotify and Apple.
All the information you need is linked below.
We hope to see you there.