- Please don't insult the United States.
We don't have a Hannibal directive. All right.
October 7th was a military defeat.
October 7th was where the Hamas came across the border
and took you by surprise.
They killed nearly 400 Israeli military personnel.
The remaining people, about 800.
The majority of them were killed by you, you
and your military, who hunted them down
because of the Hannibal directive.
We now know that the vast majority
of Israeli civilians killed on October 7th were killed
by the IDF, by Apache helicopters, by tanks,
by your own soldiers.
The Israelis say as they were driving us the hostages,
as they were driving us back in the Gaza,
we were attacked by helicopters.
One lady, you killed my husband. You killed my child.
I was wounded. We know the Israelis slaughtered
their own people.
Benjamin Netanyahu do not equate America with that,
because as bad as we are, we don't kill our own people.
You son of a bitch.
- Welcome to - The daily wrap up.
A concise show dedicated to bringing you the
- Most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours
- Thursday, May 16th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
And here we are, at least in the first
setup of the new location.
And I will be giving you guys a,
a little roundabout view here, not in this show,
but in probably our substack
and on social media in the next couple
of days once I get more set up.
But I do want your guys, as you know,
thoughts on where we are.
'cause this is just kind of the first
interim I, you know, moment.
I, I have more thoughts, let's put it that way on
what I think I want to do here.
And this is one of the different locations,
pirate Stream and so on.
But, you know, I think simple is best.
I want your guys thoughts on it in general, but first
and foremost, to shout out
to everybody out there who's supporting the last American
vagabond, who supported, who is, you know, in the process
of supporting us against all
of the attacks that we're going through.
And just, you know, we couldn't do any of this without you.
So thank you for all of your ongoing support
because it's, you know, whether it's PLA
or other independent media, it's never been a more important
time, in my opinion, in history to support, you know, well,
I guess I was gonna say alternative media,
independent media, but you know, they're, I would try
to frame it in a way that would be not electronic
related, you know, just resistance,
people pushing back is the power.
I think that's where we really are.
And I think that's kind of the, the resonating feeling
that most people are having, that we can do that.
That it is possible to stand up
and recognize that we are powerful
if we actually circumvent look beyond our,
our party lines or divisions.
The lines drawn through the middle of us, left and right, up
and down horizontal by the power structure like we saw
with the COVID-19 illusion, where they were so desperate
to get us to think that it was partisan
and it was self-Evidently not.
And I think the same thing about
what we're gonna talk about today
or what we have been talking about in regard to what is one
of the biggest things that I've ever covered in regard to,
and, and I'm not even just talking about the, the genocide,
but the way that this conversation has changed the world
in positive ways, but also negative ways.
And I think it's important to see that,
and like even comparing it to like how big the
medical experimentation
that we call the COVID-19 illusion really was
and continues to be.
I have some points I'm gonna start with on that.
I was just talking about this today, that what we're seeing,
the genocide itself is I, I've said I stand by, it's,
we're gonna talk about that for the next thousand years.
I mean, this is a huge moment, terrible moment, but
because of the size, because
of the shifting political dynamics,
because of how much this will change,
this is gonna be something that people talk about.
And also because of the interesting overlap
of propaganda in the electronic age, the technocratic age,
the, the, the deep fake element.
I mean, so many different things this will be
talked about for a long time.
My point was that just comparatively, I think that
what we're dealing with here is, if not at the same level of
how important and how world changing the COVID-19 illusion
was, both on awareness, also the byproducts, the
negative consequences of what was done
and things that people ignored, but also just
because of how much suffering it's causing
and it the world around.
So we're gonna talk today
about a couple of important things.
It's gonna be, you know, every time I say this, I always
slap myself because I almost never
follow through with it being shorter.
But I believe today is going to be only
because I try to do only a couple of topics.
And a lot of the time was done setting up in here.
Uh, but my point is that we have two main things
that we're gonna get into, one
of which is really fascinating and really horrible.
I was following some coverage from Ryan Grim in regard
to a post that he found,
and we'll go through all of this coming from Hamas
and different relation related aspects of coverage
that they're pointing out their Facebook channels
and everything else, where they were arguing
that they were engaged with IDF and that
because of the way that they had, you know,
to make it quick in this opening, has succeeded
or kinda put them in a position of, of, uh, insecurity
that Israel decided just bomb the entire location, including
with IDF members present.
Now, that was just an unconfirmed statement that, you know,
at this still to this point is a statement made by people
that claim that they were there, Hamas members,
which there's no reason we should blindly take at face value
what Hamas says, just like we should not blindly take at
face value what Israel says.
That seems like a pretty common thing we should understand.
But now we have a story that's developed around that,
where Israel stands up
and says, we accidentally killed our own people, which
I find it hard to believe they would ever announce
that without people pointing to it,
which I think is possibly what happened.
But also I think it's because
it's about setting a narrative.
And we're gonna get into this the many times this has
already happened, the, the many hostages
that have been shot publicly, you know, in the sense
that they were in front of other IDF members, one
of which was essentially got away
and was screaming behind the buildings like, don't shoot me.
And they called him out and they shot him.
Anyway, again, I've said this many times, I don't know
how you look at that situation
and think that that was an accident.
Sure, it certainly could be, I guess.
But this is what we're gonna talk about today in regard to
a new example of this
that is bigger than just a couple of people.
But a dis uh, what what appears to be a, a strategic,
or it could be a strategic choice to avoid
anything worse than saying whoopsie,
we accidentally killed people, which, you know,
friendly fire happens kind of a thing.
And I, you know, I, you guys can decide for yourselves.
I think it's very clear
that I don't anybody can dispute the, the reality seeing as
how they have a literal directive called the Hannibal
directive that is about killing your own people
to avoid the downside of what might happen if they're taken.
It's exactly what that is,
and it's a public thing at this point.
We'll show you the colonel who's discussed this
as happening on October 7th.
I did this would be
ki I was, there's something else I was gonna go with there.
But the point is ultimately that this would be
a choice from an institutional level,
from a government level, from a level of, you know,
whether we're talking about the way we perceive power
and the voting in people are supposed to take care
of their constituents or just a level
of just power structures that are disregarding anything.
We pretend we care about international law, deciding
to kill their own people to avoid what that might look like.
And then even saying that we killed our own people
and as if that's, I know we, we will get into it all today.
I think it's really interesting to
see that being the choice.
And as we've seen so far that Israel has failed to announce
or discuss or highlight anything
that they don't think will be benefiting their situation.
So I find it odd that they would
point to something like this.
Now we're also gonna talk about a couple
of other very huge lies that are being shown, which
of course flavor this conversation is
how many times they seem to lie about very,
very easily proven things.
And this gets into some interesting overlaps
of the same kind of story of RA
and shooting police, uh, police escorts of food aid
and then saying that, look, Hama,
they're not even escorting the aid anymore
because you continue to shoot the people
that are claiming they're Hamas,
but there's no evidence that they are Hamas.
And the same cycle has continued
and at the moment we just highlighted they killed their
first, not un remember,
but international UN staff member who was there immediately.
All these other stories spin up the story about the United
Nations having the numbers of the Gaza death toll,
which is complete fabricated lie.
We'll go over in depth again.
Well, we briefly mentioned it,
we're gonna go over extremely in depth today.
It's fascinating to me to see how this reverberated
through all of the supposed high-minded journalists out
there who just parroted the story
and many of which still to this moment are parroting
that story standing by it, shouting people down
for telling 'em they're wrong, even though the link they're
giving you proves that they're wrong.
It's, it's on, it's, it's almost unparalleled.
I have never seen it like this.
And I think it's a combination of that they're just
that bad at their jobs and haven't even realized
that blindly accepting what they're handed is not
what journalism is, and people that are knowingly lying
for other very dark reasons.
A multifaceted grouping of them point though is
that we're talking about these other stories that spun up
to kind of cover that and other examples
of them shooting the UN members.
But this one is about, we'll talk about policemen
escorting the un, which is what this Andra these are these,
there are official entities that exist in Gaza.
And remember because of the way, as we now know, that the,
the Israeli government manipulated into
making Hamas in power.
That's the reality. They sent funding, they made sure,
as many officials have stated, that they would be in power,
which again, lays adds a whole lot of doubt to the claim
of an election taking place.
We know it did, but whether it was real
or not is my question, not that I know.
My point though is that they made sure they were in power,
which then by default
after 2006, made sure that everybody there, whether wanting
to be overlapped with Hamas
or not, was forced to work through them to get to anything
that had to do with any government overlap.
So social processes.
So people who were policemen had to work through that.
So now you've got this narrative where they are no matter
what, and they're shooting all these policemen.
Now you've got examples of them while they're getting caught
shooting UN members, while they're getting caught bombing
people that they just go, oh look, we caught the UN on video
with a bunch of terrorists.
And every major person in this conversation is pointing at
this when it's as easy as anything in this conversation
to show these are policemen.
Now, could you argue, they might also, sure, you can argue
that about anything we're talking about.
They're not proving that there's no evidence to suggest
that they are Hamas other than the things I just discussed,
the possible overlaps.
And yet it continues
to reverberate this just like the false UN numbers
or the claim that the numbers
have been half, which is false.
And we're also gonna talk about some other unnerving things
that are taking place to end with.
But let's start with a couple of
points I think are very important.
So we're not just, um, there we go.
So we're keeping up, let's put it that way on some
of these other stories that I do think are very important.
One of which in general is just to make sure
that we're continuing to recognize
that Twitter is not a free speech platform.
Okay? Here is Alex Rubenstein highlighting
that Kate Claren berg was censored, which we highlighted.
Now, you could argue as we showed the things
that at least I, I'm moderately sure that
what they were highlighting was what he was censored for.
And yeah, the statements were a little bit, uh,
what's the right word for it?
I mean, frankly, it doesn't matter.
They're all protected by free speech.
My point is that they were something
that you could argue was, you know, may have bothered you
that he said something that may have been taken
as insulting or whatever.
And it was in the context of Zionism
and Israel and what's going on.
And I think it was about the idea of hostages
and what, you know, like for instance,
and this is not what he did, but the argument of one
of these Zionist supporters out there
saying, yeah, I hope he got raped.
Like that kind of conversation
where it ends up being something where you're like,
oh yeah, we're supporting these people.
Well, I hope it ends up falling in your lap.
That kind of a sentiment.
I can't remember exactly what the words were.
My point was in no way was what he said, as bad
as the things we see currently being
displayed all across Twitter.
And on top of that, it was protected under free speech.
He was expressing his opinion.
Nothing of it even remotely violated the rules
of Twitter, but he was censored.
And guess what? This is the most important part.
And they upheld that decision.
Now, usually what I've seen is people like this usually
prominent get a slap on the wrist, right?
And that's not to say anything against that cl uh,
excuse me, uh, uh, kit Berg.
Because ultimately it's, the point is
that they do this and it's about pressure.
People in the community like Alex, whoever, they reach out
and they say something and eventually they pull back
'cause they, you know, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.
But this is a big name to ultimately be censored
and upheld for getting mass reported by Zionists.
Now, regardless of what you think about what he said
or what you, it's, this is not free speech,
otherwise we should be very clear
what is exactly the problem here.
What did he say and what was the violation?
You don't, none of this is accountable anymore.
Anyway, I hope we recognize
that there's a lot more than just kit,
but it's important to see that this is not
going in the direction we want it to.
Now, another important note that I just wanted to highlight,
kind of sporadic points to start.
Justice Department formally moves and,
and we mentioned this briefly a moment ago
or a couple shows ago, reclassifying moves
to reclassify marijuana
as a less dangerous drug in historic shift I call bs.
I think this is a cowardly sidestepping move
that doesn't really change the illegality
and it just moves it to a lower class.
That's all this is, is that's all this is.
And it drives me bananas that we're talking about something
that is one of the most widely recognized substances
that is not what they claim it is.
That is not dangerous.
Even this, I bet you Alex Burn
and his head's exploding seeing this out to him.
It's, ah, I always make fun of him for that
because clearly I think he was blind when it came to Covid
or uh, uh, cannabis.
And my point was, the same people that were lying
to us about Covid were the same people that lied
to us about cannabis, but we couldn't piece together.
I think it's because he has some like, you know,
seminal work on cannabis that brought him up in his career.
And it's just, it's just ridiculous reefer madness
style nonsense if you get into it.
And we've broken it down extensively.
My point though is that it's going from
class one to class three.
Now, what's crazy is
that it's even still in class one alongside the worst
and most dangerous drugs, which ultimately means, which
by the way, in my opinion,
none of this should be the reality.
You as an adult should be able to do anything you want
to your own body and the safety of your own home
or elsewhere, as long as you're not putting people in
danger, that 'cause
of the laws are in place for that kind of thing.
It's what it should be. That's freedom.
That's actual liberty.
But they're telling you, you can't take these things
because we're the adults and you don't know any better.
But, but one meaning no medical value
and highly addictive, both of those are false provably,
scientifically false.
Now, of course in the, the addiction side
of this, I've gone through in depth.
The point is that there, you can le literally
be addicted to anything.
You can be jog, you can jog so much, they become addicted
to the concept of jogging.
These are scientific discussions.
I've gone through this in depth.
I often highlight, uh, g mate, Aaron mate's father,
who has amazing work on addiction, which really breaks down
that we don't fully, or maybe we intentionally don't
understand it really, it's, it's different than just
the chemical addiction substance concept.
But nonetheless, my point is the scientific research
around this endlessly, just like with the covid conversation
that we all trust the science and ignore, not we all,
but you know, who I'm talking about, says very clearly
that these things are not the reality.
And especially when you realize that going back
to the eighties, the United States government had programs
using medical cannabis for medical use,
and they yet still go zero medical possibilities
and put it in schedule one all the way to this day.
Oh, but now they're gonna move it to schedule three,
which is, I'll just read this if approved, which
by the way doesn't even happen yet.
The rule would move marijuana away from its current
classification as schedule one alongside heroin and LSD pot.
Just love that marijuana cigarettes would instead be a
schedule three substance alongside ketamine
and anabolic steroids, right?
Because it's as dangerous as ketamine round steroids.
Or, or, or how about this?
Or as dangerous as Vicodin
or s mushrooms, psilocybin, frankly, I think, you know,
I I'm not trying to say that any
of these things are necessarily dangerous in the,
in the sense of moderation.
That's my bigger point.
But think about how crazy it's to take something.
I don't, I'll include this by the way,
one I just recently wrote for the substack,
the Cannabis Deception, how
the government stole Your Future.
And you know what, since we're talking about it,
this larger article I wrote a long time ago
and re posted it, I think at least once,
so the date will be updated
and I think I still have it in there.
Yeah, 2016 was originally published.
The top 10 marijuana myth that no one should believe.
And it goes through all of them and has linked
source material to each one of them.
Make sure you understand this stuff because it's a lie.
We have been deceived like everything else.
My point though is that how crazy it is that
that's supposed to be a positive step.
So you just downgrade the illegality of it.
This is the kind of nonsensical government action we get.
They're like, okay, we have a thing
that's completely beneficial for you
that can change the world, that can literally make better
textiles, better medicine, better, you know, uh,
but we're gonna, we're gonna not gonna,
we're not gonna make it not illegal.
We're just gonna make it a little less.
I can't even say that properly, .
My point is that instead of doing the right thing,
they just go, we'll make it le illegal but not as illegal.
Is that okay? Are we still okay?
Can I still put you in prison if I want to?
This is the kind of thing your government does
to hope it pacifies you.
We should be marching through the
streets going, this is ridiculous.
But, you know, we're focusing on bigger things obviously.
I just want us to recognize that the kind of half measure,
which is really almost a detriment, is the kind
of thing they do when they're dealing
with foreign policy or anything else.
They pacify they, uh, um,
better word I was looking for is not pacify,
but try to, it's not coming .
Ultimately they try to pacify
and hope that you just stop paying attention.
Appease. No, that's not the right one.
We'll come back to it, .
Now, I also want to discuss a couple
of more opening points in regard to medical freedom
before we go through these last two.
And I see now, I'm now as I'm, this is the thing,
you guys can laugh at me when I know
that I'm having less content.
I seem to bloviate a lot more in the beginning
and a lot more things like that.
And that that's what I takes longer. I should shut up Ryan.
Let's keep going. So the last American vagabond me,
I posted this, this is a new study right here,
and this was from March 12th, 2024.
I actually thought, I, I, I guess I forgot
who I grabbed it from.
I wanted to give him a shout out, in any case,
an important study methodological considerations
regarding the quantification of DNA impurities.
I think it was Jessica Rose off the top
of my head in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine C.
Now think about how crazy it is that we're at a point,
and I'll even show you something next,
people still tripling down on the fact that it's all safe
and effective and anyone said otherwise
as a conspiracy theorist,
and yet we're continually finding new things like this new
peer reviewed science that doesn't even get discussed,
doesn't even get pointed to
by the Fox News C-N-N-M-S-N-B-C apparatus.
Here's what it says. Oh, I'll just go right to the
image on the conclusion.
The available information
and data indicate that the ready to use mRNA vaccine ti.
So Pfizer contains DNA impurities, which we already know,
we Kernan and plenty of others.
We've been screaming about this
that exceed the permitted limit value
by several hundred times
and in some cases even more than 500 times.
So you're taking something that has 500 times the permitted
level of DNA impurities.
We've gone over this, that's horrifying.
There are so many different things that can happen here,
and we're watching it look at what's going on in the world.
But guess what? When you look at all the
problems, they're baffled, guys.
They're baffled. So here's the evidence that go,
if this is the case, it's gonna cause a lot
of these da dangerous things and look over here
and go, man, look at all these dangerous things.
And yet they can't connect those dots or they don't want to.
I think we all know that there's a huge part
of the apparatus to the system
that recognizes they were wrong or knew they were lying
and are just dug in like a tick
and will never acknowledge that this was the reality.
The whole Scott Adams routine.
I was right, even though you were,
or even though you, I even though
I was wrong, I was still right.
And even though you were right, you were still wrong
because you just got lucky.
And even though I'm wrong, I made the right choices
as an expert should have.
And it turned out that wasn't. It's
just like that's ridiculous.
That's absolutely crazy.
The truth is, the science was there.
We were highlighting it like a lot of the doctors
that got censored were, and we're not just making things up.
This is the same point. Now, where are the Scott Adam now?
Why aren't they highlighting? Maybe he is,
but so many of this, so much
of this is completely lost in the conversation
because there's bigger things going on in the world,
which says, and that is, and and that this went unnoticed.
It says, because the DNA quantification carried out as part
of the batch testing, only at the active substance level
appears to be methodologically inadequate.
You know why? Using a PCR test, oh my god,
who could have seen that coming?
This is designed, I don't see how it's possible
that the same failings can continue to be present
and continue to be the reason why we whoopsy didn't see the
thing that would've accidentally shown that we were wrong
or that we were hurting people.
That's called a self-serving mistake, if you will,
that they're using the thing
that they knew they could later go, oops.
That's why we didn't notice it.
But that's the thing we were going, that's not working,
that's not supposed to work in this case.
You're lying about that cycle thresholds.
It's over and over and over.
This is so it's extreme criminality
and no one's even talking about it other
than the people you expect.
Kevin McKernan, who I, I highlight
because I think he was one of the earliest people on this
conversation and plenty of the others.
I talked about the misfolding proteins with Jessica Rose,
the the truncated spike proteins, like all
of this stuff guys, these are proven realities at this point
and no one's even talking about it.
Now my point is that we have talked a lot about it.
These aren't new topics necessarily.
I just wanted to make sure you
weren't missing these updates.
Now here's what's crazy. This is from BBC.
This is written 17 hours ago.
Here's what's hilarious to me, by the way.
You know, so many of these are like experts fear
or scientists say funny how this one just says expert
singular fears, vaccine theories or effect.
Think about how dis desperate that is.
So you can't find more than one
expert to throw on your title.
So you made an entire article today about one random guy
who stands up and goes, I'm afraid about conspiracy
theorists misleading people.
That's it. There's no science in this.
There's nothing to back it up.
He just has a doctor, he wears a white coat
and he says he's scared.
Let's write a whole article about it despite the fact
that everything we have in front of us now proves
that he's a complete, that he's wrong
or he's deciding to lie to us.
And it says the hell a health expert , I think
that's hilarious, is worried conspiracy theorists about
vaccines could be affecting uptake.
You don't say, how about it's
because the conspiracy theorists are scientifically proven.
We're talking about peer-reviewed science.
I just showed you one of them. So here's my point.
If I show you that look, these same things,
these telling you are safe
and effective can have 500 times the amount
of DNA irregularities
that can cause any number of serious problems.
Is that me listening to conspiracy theorists? No.
That's me going, I'm gonna educate myself about the science
and I'm gonna make that informed decision,
which means I'm not gonna get the thing that might hurt me.
Conspiracy theory.
And yes, it's affecting uptake because we're not crazy
because most people are not children
that are gonna blindly follow the lead.
And it says in recent years there has been a growth in
online conspiracy theories which suggest vaccines like the
covid jab are dangerous
or ineffective , like literally the the definition
of dangerous and ineffective.
But it says, Mr. Ward said he's worried
that people may believe the conspiracy theories.
You know, this is why they keep it opaque.
Which ones highlight one for me, if you will?
No, because then you'll go, well that's obvious.
Like what conspiracy theory that it causes myocarditis
that can cause blood clots
that you just literally pulled the AstraZeneca vaccine like
we told you from the very beginning, even though
that's the least dangerous of all of them.
Conspiracy theory don't believe it.
And it says, but he insists they are just that,
they're just conspiracy theories.
What I'm going on is facts.
You know, the one that you don't care to list off for us,
this is all just narrative on BB, C with this guy's picture.
Make sure you recognize and and make a note.
This is Derek Ward, a professor who is so shockingly wrong
or so shockingly dishonest
that he should not have a job in this field.
It says Professor Ward is also concerned about the number
of children completing a vaccination program,
which can include multiple jabs.
They, until they reach primary school age.
Yeah, because nobody believes in the system anymore.
And you know what? I can even argue
that maybe that is the wrong move.
I don't think so. I disagree.
But you could argue that maybe
because of the overcompensation of our awareness,
not hypothetical,
but the awareness of your dishonesty, the awareness
of your medical experimentation, the awareness
of the shockingly high amount of effects
that aren't necessarily side effects that seem
to be designed, that were going, what else is wrong?
What other shots have been lied about? Right?
That's just common sense.
And so people are going timeout, even people
that wanted them in the past
or still think it might be right, are just uncertain.
That's logic. That's what we should be doing.
Now my point is that maybe that is maybe the
overcompensation will end up causing more disease.
I don't think that I'm very, very much on the line
that I think that the entire industry,
because of the intent behind it, not necessarily
because the science or the process could be wrong.
I don't know. 'cause I don't believe any of them anymore.
I just, I leave it open that the intent
is why it is hurting people
because they're not either concerned about the fallout or
because they're trying to make it happen.
I don't think those are scientifically
untenable claims at this point.
But anyway, the point is that
this is the kind of thing they're pushing forward.
Lastly, don't miss this, the sub,
the select subcommittee on coronavirus pandemic put out.
And this was the, uh, 15th today based on evidence uncovered
in the COVID Select recent report.
The US Department of Health
and Human Services commenced formal,
formal debarment proceedings against Equal Health Alliance.
You realize that this is not some grandstanding
politician in Congress.
This is the US Health and Department of Health
and Human Services probably
because of, of rising awareness of what really happened or
because the Covid Select committee and
because of, you know, opportunist politicians, I think
that wanna make something because of the things that are all
so shockingly aware of mo to most people, you know, the lies
around this whole conversation that they decide to try
to make it happen for themselves.
In any case, HHS is now at least beginning formal debar.
Now who knows where it goes? I'm very s uh, skeptical
that this may just be theater.
But remember EcoHealth Alliance played a
serious role in all this.
Lemme grab a couple of articles in case
you wanna read them more on this.
Let's see, maybe that's the right one.
Yeah, I'll just include that one.
revisiting Fort Dietrich vaping overlap Covid
origins as EcoHealth restarts coronavirus work.
Remember that was on May 10th, 2023.
So God only knows what they've been doing since,
which I think to some degree we know we've talked about it,
but, and it says EcoHealth will now face an immediate
government-wide suspension of taxpayer funds,
including a hold on all active grants.
Now what do you ha what do you think the odds are that
that action becomes the justification
for why they whoopsie something went wrong.
Oops, this thing got out and it's all your fault
because you POed funding and then we weren't
able to do the things we needed to do.
That might be one of the ways this goes too.
I'm just theorizing, you know, how dangerous
it is to theorize these days.
Just consider where this could go
and don't alvi, you know, always believe that the pub,
the Republicans
or Democrats, the government
is acting in your best interest.
I think that's usually a safe bet
to assume that they're not.
Don't assume that they don't, don't question it all.
Consider that they might be the opposite.
I'll include this as well. Now let's get into
this discussion of a possible Hannibal Directive Act.
And I think this is really interesting
because of the timing of it all.
So first and foremost, May 15th, Ryan Grim post this
Hamas is claiming that it attacked Israeli troops
and the IDF was unable to evacuate the tank.
So the IDF bombed the entire area claim of 12 casualties.
And it's basically just re writing the same thing.
Now you can find these all caem brigades
and you know, telegram channels which are officially clear,
which I always find interesting, by the way, if
I guess it is telegram.
But my, I would question why they would allow that
to continue seeing is how
they just censor everything everywhere.
But you have Hamas channels that are Hamas channels.
And so the point was they posted this.
Now, whether it's accurate, always question.
There could be a lie. It could be,
you know, propaganda effort.
The point as of the 16th,
this is a report that came out.
So first of all, Johnny Gatz grass just simply,
well the report is, and we'll read it next.
Five Israeli soldiers killed seven injured in Northern Gaza
after IDF tank mistook them for an enemy.
Now this is this, even the article seems
to not really believe that, which is kind of crazy to me.
Now what he said is, looks like Israel finally
managed to kill some terrorists.
You guys can think of that what you will,
here's what the article says.
Realizing again, so this is posted today
that yesterday this was claimed.
So it doesn't mean that this, it has to be true,
but what's interesting is that he shows that you, that Hamas
had some knowledge of this.
So it could be that they were present or saw this
and decided to lie about it to get ahead of the story.
But yeah, it's, you know,
logically it feels like a much more likely scenario
that this is something they were involved
in, pointed it out.
And then as usual, the reactive propaganda
of the Israeli government is reactive as hell.
And they go, no, and they make the, I'm not saying
that's the case, but 45 times since October 7th,
I've shown you how that works.
Where something gets exposed like the flower massacre
and you get 14 channels that come out
and make reactive propaganda around it
and usually falls on its face within three days.
But it still has an effect in those moments.
So here's what they write.
As of today, five Israeli soldiers killed, seven injured
after an IDF tank mistook them for enemies,
which I don't even know how you write mistook
because of what this reads right here.
What, what they wrote. It says five Israeli soldiers were
killed and another seven wounded including,
and this, this, that, by the way,
before I go, that was the 12 number right there.
Interesting overlap.
I mean I, I think it's very clear
that they saw the same thing.
Whether they're lying about it, you can consider,
but the numbers are too hard to ignore.
And it says in an incident of, so-called even they said,
so-called, and I guess they could be called saying
so-called friendly fire.
That could mean they just don't like the term friendly fire
or maybe they're questioning whether it was friendly fire.
You can decide in Northern Gaza's GI yesterday a place
where they've been bombing left and right
and killing civilians like crazy even though it's an area
they claim they already had secure.
Now the slain troops are named here.
If you wanna read more about them.
And here's by the way, very, very telling
that we're talking about 22, 22, 20, 20 21.
Those are the ages, sort of like the Ukraine scenario
where they're just dumping their, they're pulling up their
youngest because they're getting destroyed.
And that's objective at this point.
That's what Israel's people are saying.
Hares has written an article saying,
we have already lost it's time for us to accept that.
And you could still argue it might not be true,
but I think the evidence points
very clearly in that direction.
Here's the important part.
The soldiers all served in the paratroopers Brigade
202 battalion.
So that's interesting in case anybody has more insight into
what that group was involved in.
'cause here's some other overlaps.
I wondering whether this was something,
well, I'll wait till I'm reading this.
Just wondering whether there might have been something more
dark involved here.
Still Hannibal directive,
but you know, realizing there's a lot of people involved.
We've seen three different whistleblowers now that are part
of the IDF that kept, were anonymized.
So I mean I wouldn't put it past them from taking out
somebody who was revealing that they're committing crimes
to the world as they're about to go to prison for crimes
that they're committing, you know, from the ICC and the ICJ
and so on, or, you know, any number of overlaps like that
or people you know, we will get into in a second.
Now it says, according to an in initial IDF probe,
a tank operating alongside the paratroopers, the group
that were killed in the gili camp fired two shells at a
building where they were gathered at around 7:00 PM.
Now there's obvious to point out
that if they didn't know it was them, how in the hell are we
to pretend that they one knew Hamas was there,
which was the only way you're allowed to do that.
And two, that there were no civilians, obviously,
I think we all know that there aren't doing
that in any circumstance, and that's why this is happening.
The evidence is overwhelmingly clear,
but it says they tank the tank forces had arrived at the
area in the morning hours
and several hours later, the paratroopers reached the area
and established a post in that building.
Okay? So the tanks arrived in the morning hours
and several hours after they were there.
So I don't know how you wouldn't be able
to see this if you're all focused in the same location.
The paratroopers, the 20 year olds established a post
inside the building later in the evening, another group
of paratroopers reached the area
and notified two of the tanks
that they were entering the building.
So now you've got one group that was there with them
that went in the tank, the built the tank
drivers must know they're there.
Then you have a secondary group that shows up
and goes, we're going in the building too.
Okay, so now you've got two different groups that are there.
It says the tank forces had later identified, this seems
to skip a whole part of the story,
a gun barrel from one of the windows.
You mean one of the windows in a building
that you know people are in
because they told you they were going in?
Yes. And it says and believed it was enemy forces.
Okay, so let's just say hypothetically,
knowing you've got two units inside the building
that you say, oh, oh, I see an IDF
gun right over there in one of the windows.
What would you be your logical response knowing there are
two units in the building which bomb the building,
which is what happened hardly.
You would notify the people in the building.
There's a, there's a Hamas number over there.
They would probably engage
or maybe you would fire isolated in the one location.
But it says leading them to fire two shells from
the tank at the building.
I don't even know how that makes possible sense.
This is the sit. Okay, and just to rehash this one
is the story I was just telling you this was from
December 18th, 2023, hostages shot by IDF,
who were literally holding an SOS sign in Hebrew, right?
And you the, I think their image is right.
I mean the, I don't know why it's clear to me
that they would not miss take these three people as Hamas.
In any case, they were speaking in
Hebrew, they were hostages.
They came out with their hands up and waving a white flag.
So even if they thought they were Hamas, that's not supposed
to be people you shoot, which we know they are.
And we're like, we are hostages. Please save us.
Shot, shot killed them both.
One of them got away, ran behind the buildings.
It's all written in here. 20 minutes.
It took 20 minutes for them to coax the other guy out.
Imagine what he's saying in that timeframe. Don't shoot me.
I'm, I'm an, I'm an Israeli, I'm a Jewish, I'm,
I'm speaking in Hebrew, okay?
And then my point is, they coaxed him out. Come on, come on.
You're okay. He walks out, not one,
but two of the IDF members shoot him dead.
That's the story. You can read about it right here.
And yet worship believe that was a whoopsie accidentally.
Oops. We didn't realize it was you
who was telling us it was you the whole time
and screaming you're an Israeli oopsie.
Okay? So they went in the building, they shot the building
after they went in knowing they were there
because they claim they saw a gun rifle.
I mean, there's no, okay, the same point applies.
And I don't want you to miss either.
They decided to kill all these people
because of some other Hannibal directive or
because these people were saying things they didn't want
them to say, or any number of other possibilities,
just hypothe hypothesizing.
And that means that they couldn't have known
that Hamas was there, right?
Because they killed these people on accident.
So they didn't know what was in there
and they definitely didn't know whether they were civilians.
There's just no way around this guy.
This is an important event.
It show, it, it only really for those
that have not been paying attention thus far,
there's 45 different examples from the last two days
that show you they're literally shooting
and killing people for no reason.
But I think this is ex exponentially important.
Now, here, by the way, is one of the images of the bombing
of an entire residential block in the middle
of DLI refugee camp.
Now, this is on the 16th,
but this very well could be the bombing.
I don't know. My point is, it's just in
the camp that we're talking about.
And they literally exploded this whole building.
You see now, there's just no way you pretend
that they made sure if they,
if they're accidentally killing their own people
and building, they're not checking these, they are just,
they're destabilizing.
They are destroying, they are completely leveling the area
by the way that they've said many times.
They're going to level Gaza,
level Gaza building settlements.
And yet we all pretend like we don't really know what's
happening or the ones that don't want to see it.
Now, let's not forget,
in case you're just disputing the very concept
of the Hannibal directive, an Israeli colonel
amongst many others, by the way, tank drivers,
helicopter pilots, the head security of the kibbutz era,
all on the record saying they watched IDF shoot people, uh,
Yaz Poat, I believe said they, she stood back
and watched them fire tanks in a building
where she knew they were civilians, watched her family die.
People that came back from Gaza said they watched their
family members die because of idea of bombings.
I don't know how it's possible this much can be ignored,
but the Israeli colonel on the record said,
this is a mass Hannibal talking about October 7th,
which is why I use that image again for the cover
of the show today, the cars that they swept to the side
because they didn't want you to see them scattered along the
road because there's nobody else that could have done that
besides their, besides their bombings.
And even then the actual munitions were only
accessible to Israel.
No Hamas mortar could have caused that from what they had.
Watch it for yourself as well as this interesting one,
which I actually hadn't even seen.
It doesn't surprise me though, I've seen four many different
examples of the same conversation.
But this is a Hebrew paper, why Not News from,
uh, December 12th, 2023.
It says one fifth, which it's way more than that.
But this is them admitting Israeli IDF reports admitting
that one fifth of all the fatalities on October 7th were due
to friendly fire or accidents.
Where is that the conversation?
So this is confirmed on the record in Israeli media
by the IDF, that one fifth
of all the people they killed were accidentally shooting our
own people or a, or, or friendly fire.
Do you not realize how obvious that is?
It's way more than one fifth.
And that's why they're actually having to admit that.
And this is be, this is coming out like a waterfall.
And this is old. I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more
attention, but we already know this.
The Hannibal directive, I think is the most obvious part
of what we're discussing.
Very, very important. So keep an eye on this.
We're gonna continue to follow up on how this develops.
Again, I think it's interesting to follow up on
what the group's brigade was,
what they might have been involved with.
So overall, remember the whole point
of the Hannibal directive is about taking out people on your
side, Israelis as the Israeli government,
because they worried about how they will be used.
And that's what it comes from. Hannibal directive comes from
a time when an Israeli, I think it was an, uh, official
or a, a general
or somebody high up, don't quote me on the exact title,
but it was somebody high up that got taken
and they were forced to exchange a huge amount
of their prisoners and embarrassed them.
And, and so from that point forward, it wasn't pop pop, uh,
public at that point.
It is now they made the directive that said, okay,
if this happens again and we're sure it's gonna be taken,
we kill them because that's in the best interest of Israel.
Whatever the narrative is, same thing the
United States government does.
It's not you're killing your own people, it's a crime.
But that's the, it's an undeniable reality.
So what were these people doing?
It could just be that they, um, made an accident.
Oops, we didn't mean to kill them
'cause we're that bad at this because we're not
communicating because we're not a real military.
I mean, these are things we keep seeing no real
control over these individuals posting things on TikTok.
Or it could be just that it sounds like,
and Hamas reported the day
before this came out, that they were winning
and worried that they were gonna take these people.
They murdered all of them anyway.
But it seems that there were some that were wounded.
So it'd be interesting to see if some of them speak out,
but I don't know if you would, realizing
how easily they could just kill
you and nobody's gonna say anything about it.
Or it could
be any number.
Well, I mean, I guess the,
the Hannibal directive is the real point.
But I'm, I was gonna tell you there
could be variations of why.
But the simple reality is they were killed.
And with everything else that we can see behind this,
we should at the very least be questioning
whether they're just so desperate at this point
that anything that goes awry, they don't want it to be seen.
So they're willing to wipe it off the map.
Now, if you don't think that's possible
and you don't believe that they're actually doing any
of this, whether it's about Hannibal directive
or just killing Palestinians,
I think this is an important report.
Omar Shaki, who is the Israel
and Palestine Director for Human Rights Watch,
highlights this new 100 page report from a group called the,
uh, United, excuse me, university Network for Human Rights.
A and basically it has a human rights, well, excuse me,
that group and human rights centers at Yale, Cornell,
university of Pretoria,
and Boston University, all fine,
that Israel is in fact committing genocide against
Palestinians and Gaza
and calls openly for the governments to avoid complicity
and act to bring an end to the crime.
Now, of course, it'll be dismissed as your Hamas
or whatever narrative you're antisemitic, which is usually
what we see, but that's increasingly
and not entirely lost power 'cause it's been lied about
and misused there is racism
because racism is not calling
out the crimes of a government.
Here's what it says. And I think this is powerful genocide
and Gaza analysis of international law
and its application to Israel's military
action since October 7th.
Now, this could be driven by the fact
that they're basically attacking higher education, which I,
I'll be the first to do as well
from an American perspective.
'cause I don't think it's even worth anybody's time anymore
because of politics and whatever else.
But that's not to say that we should allow a foreign entity
to pretend like all the people involved are somehow racist
and should be shut down as oppressed
and censored free speech at all.
You know, protecting the worst of speech is the reality,
whether that's what's happening or not.
So you can recognize maybe a driving moment for these people
to stand up and fight for that
feeling like they're being attacked
or that these people in these colleges support
the protests or whatever else.
Or it could just be that they recognize this is actual
genocide and they care about that, or they could be lying.
And it is possible. But I think the evidence we can list off
here that you can read for yourself, that we can back up
with actual citations is the most easy thing to prove.
And I mean, almost in all of my time doing this,
even over the COVID-19 conversation,
this stuff is shockingly easy to prove.
As you'll read, as I'll read right from what they said,
as you've seen, as we've talked about,
they are shamelessly saying this stuff.
None of them are innocent. I mean,
Alan Dershowitz just penned an article from New York Post
saying, how, how, how innocent are these goins?
Like just so detestable disgusting.
A person like Alan Dershowitz on his moral superiority
Epstein buddy, right?
Only in your underwear though I heard it's just incredible.
These are the people taking stances
of moral superiority over, you know,
how gross these goins are.
They're not really innocent at all.
Meanwhile, pretending like you're only going
after Hamas, but here's what it says.
Coming from major institutions around the world
and university network for human rights in the light
of the extraordinary implications of a finding
that Israel may be committing genocide,
that comes from the ICJ,
the World Court against the Palestinian people in Gaza,
the University Network for Human Rights,
the International Human Rights Clinic at Boston University
of School, uh, excuse, excuse me, university School of Law,
the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell, uh,
law School, the Center for Human Rights at the University
of Pretoria, and the Lowenstein Human Rights Project
that Yale Law School have conducted a thorough legal
analysis of Israel's acts since October 7th, 2023.
And that's just since October 7th.
Mind you, you, which is crazy
as situated in their historical context.
After reviewing the facts established
by independent human rights monitors, journalists,
and the United Nations agents, we conclude
that Israel's actions in
and regarding Gaza since October 7th, 2023,
violate the genocide convention.
Specifically, Israel has committed genocidal acts
of killing, causing serious harm to
and inflicting conditions of life calculated
to bring about the physical destruction
of Palestinians in the Gaza, a protected group
that forms a substantial part of the Palestinian people
between October 7th, 2023
and May 1st, 2024,
Israel has killed at least 34,568 Palestinians,
which yes, that is correct.
We'll break into that next segment right
after this reading of how clearly that is the case,
despite the absurdly obvious to prove their fault lie,
how the obvious lie that they have these numbers
and it says, and injured over 77,000.
These figures in total comprise more than 5%
of Gaza's population, which remember, if you don't do,
you know respectively, that's like 6.5 million Americans.
Think about that for a second.
With over 2% of Gaza's children killed
or injured, approximately 14,500
of the Palestinians killed in Gaza have
been children, which is also correct.
We'll get into the identified versus non-identified
number that has not changed.
The only ones they can identify, meaning that they were
not mutilated to the point
where they couldn't recognize or prove where they were.
That's what we're actually talking about.
And think about how gross it is, people use that
to act like they were less, ah,
just like the worst of the worst.
But it says Israel killed more children in the first four
months of this assault.
Listen to this, than in all
of the world's conflicts in the past four years combined,
Israel forces killed more children the first four months
of this one assault on Gaza, one of many in the past
then in all of the world's conflicts in the past
four years combined.
But according to Israel, they've the most moral army.
Nobody has taken the cares they have
to avoid killing children despite the fact
that they've killed more children, first four months
of the assault than all
of the world's conflicts in the past four years combined.
But they did everything. They had to
somehow magically went from doing everything they were
supposed to, to now they need to do more from the US
government, the US government's perspective,
but somehow still doing everything they're supposed to do.
I mean, if, if a lot of these people don't go to prison, I,
I mean I, you know, man, I'm already jaded.
Anyway, I was gonna say, I don't have
any faith in the system.
I kind of don't. Anyway, but my God, this,
this needs this very damn well,
better be more than just Israeli people in
regard to Israeli government.
We know everyone in the world around can see that Blinken
and Biden and people like Richie, uh, ak
and I mean, these are people that have been blindly
supporting one of the most obvious genocides,
most people alive, have ever seen.
And it says, Israel forces have killed Palestinians
regardless of their protected status under international law
with the current bombardment cons, uh,
constituting the deadliest conflict for journalists
ever recorded, and the number
of un personnel killed reaching a degree,
never seen in history,
but again, moral, most moral,
doing everything they've needed
to do better than any other war you've ever seen
before, taking precautions everywhere.
But yet they've killed the most journalists,
the most UN members, the most children,
but the, the best ever.
I, it's just, this is the perverse inversion
that I'm talking about of reality.
Israel's military operation has destroyed up to 70%
of the homes, you know, going on a hundred.
That's what they're trying for. They're going to level this
to create what they want to.
It is the most obvious part of this.
They're literally holding conferences, have money allotted.
They are beginning to build settlements already.
And that's not occupying, they are already occupying Gaza.
This is building settlements on the occupied territory,
which is also illegal in its own
right as a stagger.
Oh, it says, uh, Israel's military operation has destroyed
70% of homes and has decimated civilian infrastructure,
including hospitals, schools, universities, UN facilities,
and cultural and religious heritage sites,
all under the elusive argument
that Hamas was present despite not having a single example.
After all, they've done a staggering 1.7 million civilians.
Over 75% of the Gaza population have been forcibly displaced
regardless of the narrative in its own right.
That is a massive war crime.
And this, as a result of Israel's military offensive
civilians in Gaza face catastrophic levels of hunger
and deprivation due to Israel's restriction on
and failure to ensure adequate access to basic essentials
of life, including food and water, medicine, and fuel.
Now, the main point is the, the ensuring adequate access,
all their narratives about Hamas and this
and that, even if everything they ever said was true,
it is still their responsibility to make sure
that they take care of the people under their occupation.
That's the reality. And this is why they try
to water it down with the fact that they're not occupied.
It's, it's one lie on top of another lie.
And this is why it's become so difficult for some
to break this all down because under the one lie is 14 more,
but people are seeing through it
and it's the younger generation, far more than anybody else.
It says Israel's genocidal acts
and Gaza have been motivated
by the requisite genocidal intent
as evidenced in this report
by the statements of Israeli leaders.
Most obvious point of all of this, the character
of the state and its military forces conduct against
and relating to Palestinians and Gaza
and the direct nexus between them.
As this report details, officials at all levels
of Israeli government up to
and including the Prime Minister himself, have made remarks
that not only express blatant and unequivocal dehumanization
and cruelty against Palestinians and Gaza and elsewhere,
but also explicitly reflect intentions to destroy
and exterminate Palestinians as such.
Then I even have to read that
to some people don't know that it's shocking.
I know you guys likely do.
I don't say likely 'cause we may have new people in the
chat, but thank God this stuff is the
most obvious part of all of it.
Openly saying they have no right to be there,
that they have the right to exist,
that we can destroy them all level it all stop everything.
And yet they stand up and act like we're
misrepresenting them 'cause you're racist.
The patterns of conduct of Israeli military forces
and Gaza further reinforce the finding
of Israel's genocidal intent.
Israel's violations of the international legal prohibition
of genocide, amount to grave breaches of preemptory norms,
of norms of international law, and must cease immediately.
These violations also give rise to obligations
by all other states.
And this is also the important part.
I think this was Sam Husseini was making this point
that it's important to recognize that all the other states,
uh, that are signed onto the Genocide Convention,
who are looking the other way,
they could find themselves in court, maybe not to the point
of committing genocide, but being complicit with it.
I mean, I think we all know that's at this point,
like throughout history, almost equally as important
because at this point, especially
because if the US were to have tried to stop this,
they could have on day one, but they didn't care.
And I think they never have.
And that's the sar, the hard reality
for many Americans to grab their mind around.
And that doesn't have to be that way. Guys.
One positive note is that we literally can,
we're doing it right now, if we just stay the course, look
beyond the two party screamers, the top of the paradigm
that want you to keep things the same way.
We can change this.
We can find a situation where we don't have
to rely on people that are inherently dishonest.
That's the reality, right?
It's not in the way it should be, but it can be
and we can make it that way.
Now, it says to finish, uh, it says oh,
and it says, these violations also give rise to obligations
by all other states to refrain from recognizing Israel's
breaches as legal
or taking any actions
that may constitute complicity in these breaches.
And to take positive steps to suppress, prevent,
and punish the commission of is by the commission by Israel
of further genocidal acts
against Palestinian people in Gaza.
The fact in this report are current as of May 1st.
So 15 days have passed since then
between the its finalization
and publication reports have already emerged of additional
egregious and some of the worst actually abuses
by Israel against Palestinians in the southern city
of Rafa and elsewhere.
Jublia, for example, where more than a million Palestinians
are seeking refuge in Rafa.
These developments though, though not uh, um,
though not reflected in the report,
further demonstrate Israel's ongoing genocidal conduct
and intent and underscore the urgent urgency
with which the international community must act.
Now, you could disregard this as, you know,
woke universities, which I'm sure the Republicans
that are screaming at the top of
the paradigm will want you to think.
But I think most conservatives, not Republicans,
but people that are, you know, that see this, that
recognize the two party illusion can also
see that this is a problem.
And in fact that it's the same people
that were screaming about the, the Covid shots
and the same kind of suppressions and covid lockdown.
These are the same things guys.
The overlap is obvious
or the fact that as Republicans, as conservatives,
you are being censored under the guise
that you were antisemitic or that you were racist
or that you were a Nazi 30 seconds ago.
Maybe there should be a little bit more understanding there.
For some of you don't want to recognize that
because of the party paradigm.
I think most of you do though. I really do.
Now, let's talk about the numbers.
I find this to be very important.
I feel like somebody needs to make like an
entire study about this.
Not just because of the lie, but
because of how clearly this demonstrated the broken nature
of our entire media apparatus.
You and really just because of the whole
manufacturing consent point, right?
A lot of people I don't even think recognized
how bad they are at this job
because they're taught
that they're great because what do they do?
They follow. It's not what journalism is.
They don't know that manufacturing stand.
They would, they wouldn't be in these positions if they
didn't already hold certain beliefs that allow them to think
that they were doing what they were
told they were supposed to do.
It's a very clear manipulation
and sometimes they can see through it
or they people in those positions that are,
they're very a reason to tow certain lines,
to hold certain things very like.
And you see this overlap, whether we're talking
to Zionist infiltration
or people in this country that blindly align with that
for many different reasons and are willing
to openly lie about it and maintain that lie to this moment.
Now, oh, I knew that was gonna happen. God darn it.
So here's the article Robert put out today,
the shocking origins of the debunked claim
that the un revised Gaza death toll.
Fox News published an article on May 13th,
which they have failed to retract,
and that ended up going viral on social media falsely
claiming that the United Nations had decreased its recorded
Gaza death tools by around 50%.
Now, other claims, which are interestingly overlap,
but in their unique, in their own way, equally dishonest
and wrong, excuse me, they tried to,
another group tried to claim
that it was just simply revised down by 10,000.
I'll show you where both of those lies come from.
I guess you could call them misinterpretations,
but I find that really hard to believe as
for many reasons we highlight in this article.
Now, the two key claims manufactured by the corporate media
and then pushed online by pro-ISIS,
Israeli social media personalities are
that both the Gaza death tolls and the numbers of women
and children in their own equal separate ways have been
revised down by the United Nations.
And ultimately this implies
that the Gaza Health Ministry was lying
or the un blindly believed it or they were part of it.
Now, the claim that the united
and this there's, by the way, there's two things
that Robert highlighted here
that I think are really important showing you
where this really stemmed from.
Not just that the media blindly pushed it out with nothing
but just being handed this,
but the people behind it seemed
to be interestingly, at least questionable.
But you'll see why the claim
that the United Nations had revised his death toll
dramatically went viral after Fox published
a story entitled Un Revises Death Toll, which they didn't,
almost 50% less women children killed in a
previous reported untrue.
I'll prove this to you next on May 10th at
around 10 6:00 PM excuse me, a piece was then ran
by the New York Sun
with a headline reading United Nations reports, lower
identified Death toll among Palestinian Arabs,
noting conflicting numbers from Halas Run health ministry.
Now, this piece was written by none other than MJ Koch,
daughter of Julia Koch, who is known as one
of the richest women alive
and of the, of the, of course,
notorious billionaire Koch family.
While the piece falls short
of the hyperbolic headlines in later articles contributing
to this campaign in disinformation, it does serve
as a masterclass in selective quoting and distortion
or misreading of statistics.
You know, it's hard to know what their,
if this was just bad at their job or choosing to lie,
but it says the piece written by MJ Koch,
and you can look at her Twitter feed right there if you'd
like, cites two infographics.
I'll show you both released on the website
of the United Nations, which by the way,
all comes from God's health ministry.
The numbers we're talking about, by the way,
Robert makes this point in the article.
Now, here's the point, the first graph graphic from May 6th
as we'll show you right here, which is
what it's looked like up until about the seventh
or eighth when it changed and just really
just added more information.
Oops, it says
list the total death as 34,753.
That's, that's what we've been seeing.
And you can see here that it says reported fatalities
including, and it says 9,500 women,
14,500 children right Now down here it says this number,
this whole graphic number that does not include
more than 10,000, which has been that way for a while.
So I, it is probably much more than that.
The point is they just don't know missing
or under the rubble completely separate from these numbers.
And I'll show you why that's important.
This is saying that on top of 34,000 that we can confirm
because they have bodies that there could be 10,000
or more under the rubble somewhere
or in other places that we can't see.
Then the second graphic, this is May 8th,
and they're, this is what they were showing is proof
that they were right and they're not list the total
as 34,844, right?
So it went up a little bit 'cause it's two days later
showing you they're killing people constantly.
But in the breakdown of the casualties,
it uses another statistic, which is
where Koch begins her misinterpretations.
Okay? So you can see here, and here's the actual main pages.
This is from May 8th. This one was May. Oh, that's that.
This one's I'm gonna show you in a minute.
This is up to yesterday, but here's what it changed to.
So 34,000 144.
So I don't, I don't even know how you can get confused about
the fact that the main number, I mean clearly
that didn't change, but there's some people claiming
everything's been cut in half.
Then it says 24,686 identified
as of April 30th as,
and it breaks down the different categories.
Separate. So in, so the point is
that I've said this already clearly,
and I'll play you directly from the
UN where they make this clear.
It's, they, they've all this has all been debunked
and people still maintaining it.
What they, what they, all they did was add more, uh, uh,
differentiate more, more information
showing you a breakdown.
So out of 34,844 ends up being like
10,100
and something, which is where this confusion comes in
with this number or choosing to lie of people
that they can't identify, right?
So the point is, they're not saying
that there's only now this many children compared
to the last number, go back to this
to make it more clear, right?
So this number being 14,500 children
and then they go, oh my God, they shut,
they cut it down to 7,000.
No they didn't. All they're really saying there is
that 7,797 children are what they can identify.
We know their name, we know where they came from.
Here's the family where they're connected to.
There are still the remaining amount going up to 14,500,
which you'll hear from them directly of just
what we don't identify
and where it gets really disgusting, which means largely
that they're so mutilated, they can't identify who they are.
That's a re that's the re that's the point here.
And yet they decided to hop on this, you as the fact
that they can't identify mutilated children as a way
to downplay the full number.
It's just the most detestable, disgusting,
inhuman kind of thing we're talking about.
So this is where it gets important,
and I'm just really listen
to this if you wanna understand what we're talking about.
I don't know why this is confusing to some,
I guess it's just kind of a statistical breakdown to me.
It's very simple. And then I'll get into
this 10,000 part again.
'cause what they did here is they basically said
it's the same number from up here.
That's a, that's a separate and in addition to the number,
and what they did is they then confused
or in intentionally misinterpreted, misrepresented that
that is the 10,000.
So they're going, oh, I see what they did.
They just admitted that there was 10,000.
They don't even know if exists.
It's just we're guessing it might be out there somewhere
and that they claim that was the,
that's not what the case is.
And you'll hear it directly from the un.
Not that you need to, I think it's pretty obvious.
And remember guys, as we're breaking this obvious reality
down, I'll show you some of them.
There are major media personalities,
major Israeli representatives
who are tripling down on this lie right
now, right in this moment.
Even though I have posted what the UN said
or other people have posted, what the Hertz wrote about it
saying this was fake.
And still they push because it's desperate
propaganda reactive.
In the May 8th infographic that you just,
that I just showed you, it's breakdown
of casualties is based upon the April 30th statistic,
which says right there, just based up as of April 30th.
So it's gonna go up that 24,686
Palestinians who have been identified
after being discovered versus the 10,158 who had not
yet been identified, which includes within children.
The confirmed body count is unfortunately the same,
unfortunately, just
because it's too many people that have been killed.
Now, the United names clearly states right
above those statistics
that the death toll is in fact 34,000 144.
So the first idea that the whole thing has been hack
is ludicrously obvious.
But then it says the one thing that changed is that
between May 6th and the eighth,
another distinction within the total was made,
namely whether the bodies were able to be identified or not.
Which sadly implies in some cases that
some cases they were too mutilated
to make an identification,
yet the physical body is in their possession
and the death is still confirmed by the, at least
by the Gaza Health Ministry.
The graphic also states below
that this total does not include an estimated 10,000
or more buried under the rubble,
which if added would actually bring the total
to 44,000 800 844 or more.
So there's that, that hope that makes
that very clear about how they're playing that.
But it says, while coax article misinterprets
or misrepresents these stats
to argue there are contradicting death tolls,
claiming the number of Palestinians killed is lower than
what the GA Health Ministry says.
She also fails to bring up the fact
that interestingly enough, which I think should be
self-evident, the 24,686 number that of those
that are actually identified also comes from
the Gaza Health Ministry.
So think about how dumb it is to make an argument
that you all got caught lying.
Here's the right number. ,
but that's also, that's, that's Gaza Health Ministry.
So if you're pretending they're lying, why is that one,
because it's about trying to frame it in a way
that confuses people, guys probably just for a moment
as this all falls apart.
So we don't pay attention, they just murdered a UN member
of an international staff member,
or they just bombed a million more people.
I mean, it's just constant.
It's about deviation, sidestep,
or you know, winning over opinion in small ways.
This key piece of information alone,
that the numbers still come from them, which is, by the way,
absent from the New York Sun piece.
I think most of them try to present it
as if this is a un presented number,
as if they came to that conclusion.
It's not, they just are. It's like all the rest of them.
The only group they can cite is the God
El God's Health Ministry.
And I'll show you why they continue to is,
but the point is the fact that they use that
and don't highlight that, that's where it came from while
claiming that that's why you're all being lied
to instantly debunks the
arguments being constructed in the piece.
I completely agree with that. Now remember, not
because Vice said it, but the point is the vice is
highlighting that Israeli intelligence on January 25th
of this year openly stated
that the death toll figures were generally accurate.
Now of course they could be lying,
but isn't it hilarious that the very people,
like all the Mike Rappaport of the world will come out
and say, you got caught lying.
Well, okay, well then are you gonna address the fact
that your own government lied about this for some reason?
The truth is they weren't lying.
It's always been this case and you can look back to the UN
and go back years.
They've always pretty much been accurate.
And this one is a Hebrew article saying
the Army also checks.
So the intelligence says yes accurate.
The army, the IDF checked
and said, yeah, they're generally reliable on January 24th.
How ridiculous is that?
So it goes on to say some three and a half hours later
after the Koch piece, an article was then produced
by the Times of Israel, in which it argued
that the UN has revised its women
and children death tolls to reflect a 17% decrease.
All they're doing is highlighting the number
that looked lower and manipulating that by pretending that's
what the new number is, even though that was just a
differentiation between identified and not not identified.
And it says, you know, which is false,
obviously they lied about that.
I think they know that it cites the two exact same
infographics we just showed you at,
but the same ones that MK MJ Koch used in her piece.
But interestingly, and I do think this is relevant,
without citing her article, even though that's where most
of this came from, the following is the crux
of the argument of just this.
They just highlight what he just wrote.
The fact that they're pointing to that number
and acting like that's the new number.
It's not, it's easy to prove.
This argument acknowledges
that the UN website list the total at 34,000,
while completely ignoring that the children are women list
as killed, are from the 24,000 figure of simply those
that they're able to identify.
It wasn't until May 13th,
however, that when Fox News published their piece on the
issue that the story really went viral.
And that's how that works and would give birth
to the separate claim
that the 10,000 less deaths were alleged
by the UN website, which also wasn't true.
Fox News article would make the claim
that the UN had lowered both the women
and children death tolls in Gaza by 50%.
All these, what's hilarious is they all have their own
different incorrect statistics
and numbers, none of which are true.
But it goes and again, cited the exact same
misrepresentations by those graphics.
Now what is interesting here he writes is
that despite the times of Israel
and the New York Sun, both having cited the two exact same
infographics in order to pres
to premise their separate arguments,
equally false about the UN's alleged changes
to the death toll, Fox News cited neither of those.
So now you've got three different outlets
and groups pointing to the same things, forming separately
and equally false conclusions
that all lean in the same direction
that you shouldn't trust Gaza Health Ministry.
The fact that none of these three articles bothered citing
each other, could in
and of itself be telling as all
of them use the exact same infographics.
And as he writes in the bottom,
which I don't think I get into the point is that
how is it possible that you tell,
you tell me, the writers may have missed it.
Sure, I don't believe they're even that good at their jobs.
But the editors, everybody else
involved, no one was able to know.
Of course, they were able to see,
of course they saw the Fox Star
or the, the, the Times of Israel, this the New York Sun.
Of course, they saw these articles.
So they just not only concluded something equally false,
but different in the same direction.
They didn't even cite the article.
I mean, there, there's clearly
something coordinated happening there.
That's my opinion. Another important fact to point out is
that the woman who wrote the Fox News article is a British
Israeli named Ruth Marks English, English,
who had previously worked for the Jerusalem Post
for 15 years after becoming an Israel based
correspondent for the Washington Post.
She also accompanied Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu quote on several times on high level trips
to Washington and to Africa.
English also moved to the United States in 2020 in order
to quote, assist Israel's ambassador to the United States
and the United Nations.
Gilad Erdan with his English language media outreach,
the u the the Ambassador of the United States, right?
And it says, in addition to working
with American journalists, she says,
I advised the ambassador on a broad range of current affairs
and communications matters.
Help prepare him for American media interviews.
Wrote his op-Eds .
I don't think you're supposed to say that out loud.
Speeches and social media posts.
This is on her LinkedIn page, by the way.
Now the Fox News piece was then boasted
boosted by the New York Post.
So all this time building Times of Israel,
New York Sun Fox pushes it out, right?
And the point is that, uh, um,
New York Post then gives it its final big push
that republished the article on their website.
All of these major platforms didn't either chose to
post something they knew was false
for a clear propaganda purpose, which, you know,
Smith Modernization Act, who knows,
that's certainly possible or are just that bad at their jobs
and don't even care as long
as it leans in a certain direction,
which I think most people are easy, it's easy
for most people to wrap their mind around that.
But it says, but decided to give it an even
more outrageous headline.
This is literally what the New York Post framed this as.
Un admits Gaza Death toll wrong with almost 50% fewer women
children killed in previous reported admits.
That that's crazy 'cause they're literally standing up
saying, that's not true right now, and I'll play it for you.
But this means that they again lied or knowing
or this this bad at being a journalist or an editor.
This ended up stirring up a debate online
with pro Israeli social media accounts using these articles
on which to premise their arguments that the death in
to Gaza was lower with the United Nation.
But it says that the United Nations was lying
and that the GA Health Ministry is a Hamas
propaganda operation.
The false allegations about the un changing its figures
spread like wildfire taking take for example, of the, uh,
CBC Canadian State media, which they entitled their article,
why The Un Change Its Death Toll of Palestinian Women
and Children Killed in Gaza?
So now we got Canadian media, corporate media, CBC,
Fox News, CI mean, it's everybody actually.
In fact, CNN weirdly enough didn't call it right.
Hate, hate even saying that out loud, but it's true.
The CBC piece begins by stating
that the United States nations quote is facing scrutiny
after lowering its counts of Palestinian women.
Not true, which gives the sense
that not only was the allegation proven true,
but that there was some kind of a legitimate fury over this.
None of that was true at this point.
The UN had not yet responded, but
after massive media stirred,
the United Nations finally commented on this.
And here's what the important one that I found in regard
to him addressing this directly.
In other words, interestingly enough, a couple of examples
before this, which I personally, my opinion,
feel were intentionally manipulated.
My point being, there was one guy that I saw just
before this kind of,
he was kinda like touching his face in a weird way
that might, might help you remember who I was talking about.
I don't know who it was, but he asked.
Now looking back at it,
after seeing this statement, which you'll see,
and reading the information and knowing absolute certainty
that they lied about this, that you can look at
what he says now and go, okay, I see
what he was doing in a very opaque way,
asking very specifically broad questions that get him
to say things that made it sound like everything had
changed, didn't happen.
His point was ultimately that there, you know, all
of this is un un like at the end of the day,
these are estimates, but whether it's under the rubble
or whether it's the fact that we don't know if God's
ministry could be wrong, the point
is these things are always evolving.
Doesn't mean that it's all false historically.
It's always been pretty accurate.
And to this very point, there has e
continually been shown to be correct.
And on top of that, they just got caught lying
about this entire story.
My point is that they did it in a way to make it seem
before this really broke,
that they were already caught lying
or that that was the truth story.
Plenty of these propagandas online
have been just standing with that.
Now, here's what he just said. This is recent as of, um,
what I said this on May 14th
un spokesman debunks the lie about the Gaza death toll being
halved, this easy, easily verifiable lie went viral due
to countless influential corporate quote journalists
and nearly every major Israeli supporter either lying
or failing to do basic due diligence.
- Thanks Farhan. There's some reporting that's come out
that says, quote the UN has halved, halved the number
of casualties Hal
- Halved Yes.
Has. It's a, it's a hard word to say. Yeah,
- , you know what
I'm talking about though, right? Yes.
- I I do know. Cut in half.
- Cut in half. Thank you. Uh, the, the, uh,
casualties from Gaza, is that true?
- Uh, it, it's, it's not quite the case, no.
Um, what I can tell you is this, the overall number
of fatalities that it's been tallied by the Ministry
of Health in Gaza, which is our counterpart on dealing with,
uh, the, the death tolls.
That number remains unchanged.
And it's at more than 35,000 people since the,
uh, since October 7th.
- So that's the first claim. Now that has already been kind
of walked back by most of these people where, where,
even though in the beginning they were clearly saying, oh,
they hald all the numbers, that was what kind
of became the talking point on all the Twitter screamers,
then it became clear that that was a lie.
Most of the ones that don't want to admit they were, they,
they dived to the next one.
It's, that's how that tends to work with Israeli propaganda.
And because I didn't say all of it, I just meant the women
and children, which is also not true.
But just to be clear, that's what your people are saying.
It's obvious that that number hasn't changed.
- What's changed is the Ministry
of Health in Gaza has updated the breakdown of fatalities.
Yep. For whom full details have been documented,
- Meaning their name, their location,
their family, not that they don't have a body.
- So what they pu recently published was, uh, that
they, uh, gave figures for 24,686 out
of 300, uh, out
of 34,622 overall fatalities recorded in Gaza.
- Very clear. - And those 24,686 people are the ones
for whom full details have been documented.
- Full details. Now,
Robert made a point about this just in our personal
conversations about apparently there's a whole level
of details that they, they consider to be what you then,
that person's now identified and,
and until they get all of them
that they're considered not identified,
but the body is there, as I said,
the body is in their possession.
They dig, dig these bodies outta the rubble,
and they're mutilated and they don't know
how to find out who they are.
It still goes down as a casualty. They just can't prove it.
Now, only, not only, uh, up until May 6th,
they hadn't been giving that information.
They just decided to give you the breakdown.
So we understood that a lot of them have
yet to even be identified.
It's just good, good information to break it down.
Instead, it got misrepresented
by a bunch of very devious people.
- In other words, people who have been fully identified,
those out of those, then out of that smaller number,
that subset of identified bodies,
you have 7,797 children
- Of just that subset, right?
I mean, I hope this is as clear as it can get.
The point is that there is the remainder of
that in the other side that have yet to be identified.
- 4,959 women,
1,924 elderly and 10,006 men.
And the Ministry of Health, uh, says
that the documentation process of fully identifying details
of the casualties is ongoing.
Right? Uh, meanwhile, as, as you can see if you do the math,
that there's about, uh, another 10,000 plus, uh, bodies
who still have to be fully identified.
And so then the detail
- Right there is about the other ones that need
to be identified, not the 10,000.
We, on top of all that, which he,
he mentions too are in addition to that full number, 34,000
that might still be under the rubble.
The fact that those numbers are so close is
what they pounced on.
- Those of those, which of those are children?
Which of those are women that will be reestablished once the
full identification process is complete?
- I just have to reiterate how disgusting that is.
The fact that they're having trouble identifying whether
or not they're children, just let that sink in.
This is not, this is one of the most obvious atrocities.
You, you can quibble what the word genocide all you want,
even though it's verifiably clear that the, that the fact
that they're doing this to innocent people,
whatever the narrative, it just, this is why most
people are not okay with this.
Even if they support Israel,
- We are teams in Gaza are unable to identify,
un independently verify these figures given the situation on
the ground and the continuing combat
and the sheer number of fatalities. And so, which
- May, in the argument being it's most likely a hell
of a lot more, but you
could argue it might be a little bit less.
The point is, it's an ongoing situation.
Nobody's argued that they're guaranteeing exactly.
The point is that this is
and historically has been accurate.
So I there's no better.
And, and Israel itself has said they're both accurate
and reliable, and now it's even being shown
that they've been trying to lie about it in general.
It's pretty clear. These are accurate numbers. We,
- Uh, cite the Ministry of Health
as the source for our figures.
- And do you have any reason to believe that the Ministry
of Health numbers are incorrect based on the years
that the UN has worked with the Ministry
of Health Fcaa? Uh,
- Unfortunately we have the sad experience of coordinating
with the Ministry of Health on casualty
figures every few years,
- Meaning just his, his point there to kind
of subtly point out, unfortunately,
they get attacked every few years with lots of casualties.
Who do you think's doing that? It's Israel
- For, uh, large ca mass casualty incidents in Gaza
and in past, uh, past times, uh, their figures have proven
to be generally accurate. Yep,
- Exactly what anybody honest will tell you,
that's the reality.
So back to the article, we, as he writes,
there is simply no question that the claims made
regarding the un revising its Gaza death
toll in any way or false.
Yet, despite this, these news outlets have not retracted
their various pieces and even bothered to,
and not even bothered to amend the
or them or even apologize.
Now there's, to me, that shows you this was propaganda
and there's something else driving this
under normal circumstances.
It could be plausibly argued
that a genuine mistake was made right in
the interpretation of this.
And when you break down, as I said
before, the the editors, the different people,
the multiple articles, the timeframe, it's un it's, I agree,
it's impossible at at every level.
Somebody in there might have, but at every level,
there's no way, in my opinion, what is truly worrying is
that such a large number of media outlets, online pundits
and social media influencers took these claims at face
value, didn't even care to do their due diligence,
or they know they were lying and they pushed it anyway.
Many of 'em standing by these allegations
to this very moment when debunking the allegations was
as easy as simply clicking on the links
and reading the infographic.
What's funny about that is many of them, as I said,
were citing, they're giving you the link to the infographic
that proved that they were wrong.
I didn't care,
or I should say, sorry, I was checking something.
But they, they didn't either didn't care or didn't know.
And that's what's so embarrassing for some of them,
which I've already seen some delete their tweets
because they're quietly trying
to back like Homer Simpson into the bushes.
Like, oops, I'm showing them that I am really bad at this
or that I don't care that I don't even
understand what this job is.
But it says, these are not complex infographics either.
Very simple, very easy to read.
It even puts the damn things in bold as he writes.
Or was it not? Not, these are not complex.
The key points are clear color coded, even written in bold,
so that even a child could comprehend them.
It appears as if the goal was
to create an artificially manufactured media stir about
the official Gaza death toll.
And again, whether it's distracting from something else,
like this conversation we covered here about Israel killing
International UN member, first one
of being an international staff member that wasn't part of,
you know, GA Palestinian or something.
And I think that got immediately washed away by this
and this one we'll get to by, by immediately going, look,
look, look how lost works with them
as if we should then somehow mean that doesn't matter
that you killed the person
from wherever country they were from.
There's an international member of un that's how this works.
They, they, it works for some people.
As long as you can point out something else
that you should be outraged about, you don't have
to care about the crime they just committed,
even though that's also fake.
And we'll get to it in a second. But it says just then one
day later, these Israeli government, of course,
after this whole thing happened,
as if this wasn't completely coordinated, decided to publish
because they just woke up one day
and said, ah, here's a good time.
Their own death statistics taken this whole time.
And here's the best point. You remember this clip.
I mean, I, you know, we're, we're not too long.
Maybe it's a good point to, um, to play this.
I know you guys have probably seen this.
This is a really good clip
and I, I, I hate having to shout out Pierce Morgan
because I don't think he's an honest
person, but it's a great clip.
And what he did here really did to highlight something
that I think put them on their back foot
for a very clear reason.
Now, the point is, this guy in this interview
was put on the spot and came out and made it and,
and, you know, Pierce Morgan and the conversation made it
very clear by default that they didn't either, didn't know
or didn't care how many civilians they were killing.
That happened just before this.
Now, interestingly enough, all
of a sudden when people are going, oh man,
this guy clearly doesn't know.
That means they probably are killing a lot of people.
All of a sudden this huge push comes out
to make it look like Gaza was lying
or they're all being lied to.
The numbers are small and
they're not really killing anybody.
And then after this push comes out, and this has been done
after this guy gets embarrassed
and they make this fake story, they just randomly decide
to post their own numbers.
And guess what? They've only killed 16,000 civilians
as if that's somehow better.
Think about crazy. That is.
So you're now publishing publish pub sizing publishing
that you've killed 16,000 civilians when,
when I haven't seen a single provable example
of a Hamas number you've killed,
even though I'm sure it's impossible that you haven't.
But then the point is, that's not true.
This is like the same, this is the same story.
This is like saying, oops,
we just killed our own people accident.
When more likely you murdered them for a Hannibal directive.
And so the point is, you come out with the story
to circumvent to get ahead of it.
No, it was only 16,000. Well, yeah, those are war crimes.
You might go to jail for that, but at least it's not 34,000.
At least it's not. I think that's what's happening.
I think this is desperate. In any case, it came out right
after they produced this manufactured push
and Fox News dutifully did their job as a propagandist.
Israel releases new Gaza de civilian death.
Toll says Hamas' numbers are fake and fabricated.
But he finishes by saying, why would Israel
feel the need to do this?
Now, it is likely that following a viral exchange
between British TV's host Pierce Morgan
and Israel spokesman Avi, em,
the Israeli government felt the need to act.
During the interview, as you'll see, he repeatedly
asks about the number of civilians killed in Gaza,
to which he had the, the representative has no response,
but to claim that UN's figures are wrong
and that they come from Hamas.
So you see why this is needed?
All of a sudden, the Israeli spokesman comes off looking at
guilty, and it became clear
that if any other Israeli spokesman was pressed on this
very question that they would be trapped.
So this is why you can see the reactive propaganda.
And I think they just hyped, they jumped on a moment
where they saw the UN
update something and they said, perfect.
Let's make that a minute. That's what I think.
Israel is ramping up with the tax and Gaza
and is on the cusp of a major invasion of Rafa after being,
after blocking all the crossing, they've created a situation
where the, I mean, it's very clear this's about
to happen this campaign that I think,
and Robert, as Robert writes, was designed
to belittle the suffering of the Gaza Strip
as these operations only seem to increase.
This entire facade should go down in history as an example
of how the media helped aid Israel in committing a genocide.
And as one of the clearest examples to date,
either a shocking level of corporate media incompetence
or a scandalous level of complicity, possibly both.
Here's the interview that I think really did stir
spur this whole thing on.
- Have no idea how many civilians you've killed.
- It's not that, I don't know. I'm not authorized
to give the information, I don't have the information give.
- That's complete nonsense. Why are you authorized
to gimme the number of terrorists you've killed,
but not a number of civilians?
I don't understand.
Can you
- Swear that's a real pause right there,
- PI, we will go after FMAs.
We'll do what we have to do. Oh,
- I'm sorry.
I should have grabbed, I thought this,
I just grabbed one I found real quick on Twitter.
Somebody edited all this around.
I thought it was good with, with subtitles.
So I guess somebody edited this. I'm, I apologize.
You saw it on the last show.
We played it directly from the clip that was on there.
And I'll let it play out
though, so you can get the gist of it.
But I hate that people add their own stuff
to this. It was good the way it was
- To go after Hammas to avoid civilian casualties.
Something that we have successfully done out of
that Hamas number that you just gave more than 14,000 are
terrorists that we took out.
There's more than 25,000 Hamas
and Islamic Jihad terrorists taking, taking
- Off the, how many, how many
civilians do you believe you've killed?
- We, we don't have exact figures
as you know, so the fog of war,
- But you've got exact exact numbers
for Hamas terrorists you've killed.
Why wouldn't you know how many civilians you've killed?
- Because obviously our focus is to go
after the Hamas terrorists and, uh, , no, hang
- On.
I mean, that does imply that you,
you are putting a bigger premium on killing Hamas terrorists
in terms of numbers and accountability than you
are innocent civilians.
That can't be right. Surely if you,
- Now the point though is that right there is,
we're in the past most journalists
and even right now, many of them would've taken that
and moved forward even though there's an obvious
journalistic gap right there, which he pounced on.
Well, that doesn't make any sense.
Logically you submitted
that you don't care about civilians and he's right.
Just remember that for a, for 75 years, really, you know,
it wasn't immediate, but you know, just say for 40,
50 years you've seen this overwhelming,
overwhelmingly obvious control over this kind of situation
where people would either because they're afraid
to be called racist or any number of things,
would've just let it go.
Thank God it's not happening anymore.
- You know exactly how many Hamas terrorists you've killed.
You must know how many civilians you've killed.
Otherwise, you're prioritizing the lives
of terrorists over innocent people.
- Pi with respect. Don't put words into my mouth, please.
I didn't say exactly 14,000. I said around 14,000.
Whereas Hamas will come out with precise, uh, numbers
that statisticians will look well, a
- Ballpark number of civilians.
- Well, well, of course you can.
You can use the ballpark, uh, as far as, uh,
the Hamas figures, which I reject as being false.
- Well, if they're false, why would you gimme those?
- I, I heard I gave you the, the numbers that I had. No,
- You've told me.
You know, you know how many Hamas terrorists you've killed,
but you don't seem to have any idea
how many civilians you've killed.
I'm just bemused. Why wouldn't you keep count of both?
- Are you bemused? Are you, how about horrified? Disgusted.
You're about human lie. I'm bemused.
But the point is that he even tried to say in there that,
well, the statisticians have looked at
and they don't even make sense.
Like, how do you make that statement when the army
and your intelligence have already claimed they're reliable?
It's just because it doesn't matter.
It's about immediate gratification or immediate benefit.
Lie, lie, lie, lie, get this moment, win this thing.
And then doesn't matter if we just stepped on 14 other lies.
You know, it's crazy.
I say desperate 'cause I think that's what it is.
But it could be something else driving this, but it's crazy.
Maybe they're just that bad at it. I don't know. Wild.
- I I don't have that information to give you, uh,
piers, if I did, I would.
- Well, you literally no idea
how many civilians you've been killing.
- I can tell you definitively that our aim is to go
after Hamas done.
- I I'm, I'm sorry to push you on this.
That's quite extraordinary.
You're an official spokesman for the Israeli government
and you have no idea how many civilians you've killed.
I thought you just told me that you were particularly
careful about not killing civilians.
But if you dunno how many you've killed, how can you say
that with any certainty?
- There's, even if you were to go by a ratio
of the Hamas figures, we would still be far ahead
of any Western than that
- Wasn't, wasn't my question.
You know, it wasn't my question.
- I don't, I don't have the information. You
- Literally have no idea how many civilians you've killed.
- It's not that. I don't know. I'm
not authorized to give the
information. I don't have the information
- Give.
That's complete nonsense. Why are you authorized
to gimme the number of terrorists you've killed,
but not a number of civilians?
I don't understand.
- Yeah, you do.
Real part.
Can you explain? That's crazy.
- Pi. We will go after FMAs.
We will ensure that we, um, you want
- Me to believe you're being incredibly careful about
how many civilians you're killing
and you have an amazing exemplary record,
but you don't know how many civilians you're killing.
- Now, just so you know, I'm gonna end it there.
This is only halfway through the clip. Only halfway.
It goes on exactly like this for the rest of the third
where he keeps harping on that point and good for him.
'cause that's what you should do. The guy doesn't have an
answer and all he is gonna do is push back
and say, I'm not allowed to.
I'm not authorized to. And so it really does show you,
at the very least if you wanna take him a face value
that there, he's being told he is not supposed to tell you.
What does that tell you? And no matter which way you read
into this, it's clear
that this worked out terribly for their propaganda.
And that's where this all came from.
I really, I mean he's, I think Robert nailed this.
It's exactly what happened.
And they come out immediately after this big false push
and publish their own numbers
and then Fox dutifully follow suit.
I mean, come on. This is,
and here just to go forward, actually I'll do this last,
or I've just, at least after this, remember we have,
this is Herts, this is from two days ago.
The UN says overall death count
and Gaza remains unchanged at revising source of data.
Revising meaning that they literally added more
information here.
A breakdown from France 24.
Did the UN revised down its numbers? No.
Shocking surprise, surprise fact check. No they didn't.
It's being light about everywhere.
I guess I'll do this at the end then I wanna show, I wanted
to 0.1 quick thing out about the num the food aid point down
there, but just let's remember
the people we're talking about here.
Here's a famous Zionist manipulator, David Collier,
and he goes becoming clearer by the day.
Sky News lied for seven months sharing Hamas propaganda.
It's all stemming from the same push.
He's been harping on this BBC news,
which I don't support any of these
ridiculous propaganda platforms.
But BBC lied for seven months using Hamas propaganda.
CNN lied for seven months.
He's basing this on this big propaganda push when all they
did was height point to the Gaza Health Ministry numbers.
And they're accurate. And even his own Israeli, uh,
specifically Army and intelligence have said the same Here.
Jeffrey Mead is a, uh, forget
who this was again, just a guy in this conversation.
It seems to be constantly purpose chilling for Zion Zionism.
He says, the un revised its number count by almost 50%.
So think about this. This guy reads this headline,
takes a screenshot
and then just ignorantly vomits this out on, on Twitter.
That's what a lot of people do and he's wrong.
And I highlighted that. I said, you're either
demonstrating a shocking lack of due diligence
or a shocking level disani dishonesty.
And here is the un.
Oh, this is just person sitting with the receipts.
Here is James j Marlowe.
Not familiar with the work got, you know,
but he is a foreign policy, excuse me, a foreign
and defense analyst
and broadcast journalist with focus on Israel.
Shocking, shocking for GB news, LBC.
So a journalist and a foreign and defense analyst.
And yet he blindly says they have their numbers.
These, I mean guys, these are people
that are withstanding people that have major positions
of whether they're journalism or in government.
And they are either, are this dishonest or are this inept?
It is kind of scary. I did the same thing.
Here's another one. This is just a, a Israeli Jew.
And he is saying, the Jew,
the protocols warned you about just
really trying to harp on you.
You're all racist. And then you're like, he's trying
to lean into the thing that people, Zion protocols
of Zionism or Zion and the idea that he's trying to like,
because my point is I think a lot
of these people are either victims
of like in a mental state constantly.
Not to say that there's not racism or antisemitism,
but the idea that everyone's out to get them
'cause they believe the Zionist propaganda
or they're part of keeping that illusion going.
That's my personal opinion.
But he says, so the un just quietly erased half the women,
first of all, quietly, hardly.
It was a major discussion
and they screamed about how in regard
to the propaganda around it.
But they also didn't have any of that.
It's just this is, and again, I said the same thing.
We'll see what he said. Oh,
guess, see, thanks Twitter.
So apparently somebody
responded, but I'm not allowed to see it.
Good job, Twitter. Now here's the important part as well.
I found this to be very telling Mr.
Elon Levy, you know, somebody who is clearly a propagandist.
So he didn't say anything about this.
I looked through his post unless he deleted them,
which is very likely he didn't post.
And you would expect someone like this to pounce on this,
to scream about.
I knew what I told you, but he didn't.
He was very, very reserved.
And yet though he quietly boosted a lot of the bigger posts
that said the same lie.
Another blatant lie, Israel's exposed, really?
Here he is again tweeting this one out.
One more critical comment about this revision
and posting the one I just showed you.
This is what he's doing. These guys are liars,
patented liars, provable liars, people
that know they're lying to you.
- Let me, let me preface these remarks with, I never,
never ever believe Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to know
that the Israelis are patent liars.
- Now remember the 13th of May is when they killed
a UA international UN staff member,
which is the first one they've killed,
which should have gotten a lot
of attention except they immediately shoved the
conversation into all of this.
That's important. Now, one other quick point
before we get into the other thing.
I think they manufactured the same
day to make this all happen.
It's the 14th, by the way.
I real, I truly believe all they did was take a picture
of some policemen next to the UN cars
and scream that they were terrorists
and everybody picked it up that didn't care about the truth.
Before we get to that though,
here's another great article Robert wrote from the 15th,
Fox News produces Iran nuclear weapons hoax scare.
Now, we've talked about this a lot.
The J-C-P-O-A, the, the oops, the idea of, uh, the
enriched uranium
and the lies that were spun around the whole thing,
the bottom line, if you don't remember that,
which is the joint comprehensive plan of action, the,
the new the Iran deal, the point what,
whatever your thoughts on it, whether you agree with it
or not, the point was that it was a deal created in good
faith by the US and,
and well just whatever you believe, the point is
that you create a deal.
The argument isn't good faith that you're going to honor
that deal, not just through one presidency.
The point is that they made this agreement
and the agreement stated unequivocally, I,
I'm in two separate points.
I think it was 26 and 38 if I remember correctly off the top
of my head of these different points of the deal,
which I've gone through extensively.
And I link in this discussion by the way, that the point was
that if any party in explicitly the United States pulled out
of the deal unilaterally, that that gave them the ability
to increase their rich uranium legally
and within the deal to a certain
amount, which is what they did.
And the, the moment that started the group
that pretended they didn't wanna be part
of the deal started saying, you're breaking the deal.
You know, the deal that Trump pulled out of, right?
Even though they weren't breaking the deal,
they were acting legally within the deal
because they pulled out
and they knew this guys, it's the same
thing as the numbers to the un.
They're playing on the ignorance
of the average people knowing that you don't know the finer
points of the J-C-P-O-A.
So that point by the point is
they've lied about this forever.
They've lied about Iran.
They've said every, every year for the last 40 years,
that they were 30 seconds away from a nuclear bomb.
And over and over
and over the International Atomic Energy Agency
have come out and said that's not true.
Even the United States government,
I think it was a couple a year ago,
I forget the exact time I just showed it to you recently,
came out and said they are not seeking a nuclear weapon,
both the IAEA and the US government.
So, and here we are back again where, guess what?
Fox News pushes out another
and they're just as bad as seeing outta the rest.
It's all just a teeter totter.
My point is that what this ultimately comes to,
and it's another one of these Iranian lawmaker
declares they've obtained a bomb.
That's not what happened. You read it for yourself.
It's just like the other story.
The bottom line is it is a newly elected member
of parliament who does no security access,
who has no insight to what's actually
going on with the nuclear program.
Who simply said, not that he knows this
or declares anything,
but that he believes based on a couple of opaque statements
that don't say we're doing it,
but say that we might have to change our posture,
but based on what the US is doing, which could mean a lot
of things and may have certainly,
maybe it does mean they're gonna do this.
But the point is that he said on the record
that he believes based on this
and based on the changing dynamics that they probably do.
And on top of that, guess where that information comes from?
It comes from an egregiously obvious anti Iranian platform
called the Iran International, which is A-U-S-C-I-A
or I mean, you know, my opinion,
it is an intelligence cutout that it's used
to lie about Iran.
You can read all this for yourself.
The bottom line is, it's not even remotely
that Iran lawmaker declares they've obtained a bomb,
which is what shot through all of it.
Which people like Tom Cotton
and F Lindsey Graham used to scream about Iran.
We are lost in this complete manipulation right now guys.
And so many people in this country fall for these things
'cause they believe that the people in
these outlets care about you.
They don't. Now on to this point, kga,
which I've shown you 45 times is a complete propaganda
platform that is gonna do, all they seem
to do is lie about what's going on in
Gaza, at least right now.
So they came out and said on the 14th that we,
what we're terrorists doing inside of Theistic compound?
Well, all you're gonna see are people with guns. That's it.
You can watch the whole damn thing.
You've got guns next to people in the un.
That's all you got. Okay?
And so you can watch the whole thing for yourself.
It's only 49 seconds.
So you could certainly argue Hamas members,
but don't we care about evidence?
Doesn't it matter? Because you realize there's a lot more
people with guns than just Hamas in this location.
It could be even other than Hamas, right?
Palestinian, Islamic Jihad. And, oh,
and here's another point I wanna point out too.
Now all you're seeing is just action.
There's no, I don't see any shooting.
I don't see any killing. My point though is
that one thing I do wanna point out is
that from right here, it's a different video.
So you got un, you got un,
you got un even this one's different.
So three separate locations,
you got un cars with people there.
Then you got a random guy outside of a UN building,
which doesn't then necessarily mean that they're working
with the UN or in part of what's going on there.
And then it goes to a completely separate location, which
for all I can, for all I can tell, has nothing
to do with any things they showed.
And that's the one that seems to be more suggestive
of something other than just being there on guard.
But how do we even know they're connected?
They've been caught lying every time
they put stuff like this out.
So here's the main point.
At the end of the day, it's very clear that these are,
and it's been statements, put out policemen,
as we've shown you before, where they use an image
of a policeman, even wearing the police uniform,
literally says police on his uniform
and they go Hamas with the aid
because they think people are stupid.
Israeli def the IDF prints it out.
Same thing, caught on terror, terrorist roaming,
shooting at the compound.
What the point is, Mo uh, uh, fava points out,
this is another example of Israeli propaganda
to legitimize the killing of UN workers,
humanitarian workers and journalists.
Now they are propagandizing these videos
to justify the killing of an Indian, Indian us.
So it's an Indian, by the way, UN employee
who was just killed by Israel.
Same video. Here's Mohammed pointing out.
This is a security guard for aid distribution.
Unre has security guards that protect them from thieves
and gangs in order to distribute the aid, which
by the way, they keep shooting.
Anyway, Y Giannis Tara points out, oh my Allah,
Palestinian civilian police is working
with RA in undercover clothes
to evacuate their logistics center.
Why undercover? Because Israel systematically murders them.
What an unusual incident, guys.
This is the most obvious reality of all of this.
They're shooting every
example they can find of these people.
And you know why? We know that?
Because even the United States government spoke up
and said, Hey, can you stop shooting the police officers?
Which is kind of shocking to me.
This is from times of Israel US said to ask Israel
to stop targeting Hamas police officers escorting aid
convoys in Gaza.
Yeah, it's pretty that it's, it's almost always
that simple right Now guys,
the bottom line is they are simply highlighting the people
that they keep trying to tell you are Hamas, which
by the way, they're telling you everybody's Hamas,
they're telling you the UN is Hamas.
They're telling you that the police are Hamas.
They're telling you that individual Palestinians are Hamas.
That baby in the incubator, that's Hamas.
That's what they're doing. So it kind of adds doubt.
It should to the claim
that everything is Hamas all the time.
But here is a US representative blatantly lying
to you in two ways.
First, he says, under employees took part in October 7th.
He just says that as an absolute fact.
Even though the United States and the UK have come out
and said, no, you haven't provided that evidence.
This is from last, the end of last month.
This is less than a couple of weeks ago.
Here is the unit Canada Israel still hasn't
provided evidence to back up the claims
that UN NRA was linked to Gaza
or October 7th here is from the UN Israel yet
to provide evidence to back up the claims
that they're part of it's esteem.
Damn thing. Here's the clone report.
Israel gave no evidence that they're linked
to terrorism over.
Oh, and here's human rights watch.
Israel is attacking known aid worker locations.
Yet here's a us And by the way, there are, you know,
Americans both hostages as well
as Palestinians that are in Gaza.
And here's an American representative,
I shouldn't even call him that because he doesn't represent
anything American or Americans allowing this to happen.
But then he says, now we've got video
that Hamas is using cover as cover UN vehicles.
This guy is in a, a, I don't even know a word strong enough,
he is actively creating the justification
to commit genocide, right?
He's manipulating American perception to believe
wholesale lies.
He starts with one that his own government
has said is not proven.
This guy's working for somebody other
than Americans, period.
I don't think that's hard to recognize.
Here's Elon Levy adding another manipula,
ridiculous, ridiculous claim.
The IDF targeted Hamas war room and weapon storage facility,
and you'll never believe where it was.
Guess what? The timing. An unschool.
Oh, you know how they can prove that?
Here's a, an image we concocted on our computer. Oh, weird.
There's no video, there's no source material.
It's just a random image of a, of a square, of which
by the way, you have got caught lying about
every time, as far as I can tell.
Alfa, even the B, BC and, uh, what was it?
Uh, I think it might have been France 24 as well,
broke it down and said, here's how they were lying.
Here's how they circled the wrong location.
And this is the IDF coming.
This is directly from their,
this is from their highest authority.
So they're literally sitting in rooms going,
how do we lie about this today?
It's shocking. Here's Francesca Albanese
highlighting another manipulation
that think is very important.
Israel's use of the IHL jargon, warnings, evacuation orders,
safe zones that we drop leaflets
and we're the most moral army to get civilians out
of the way, is to create the illusion
that its military operations.
Ensure protection of civilians. This is the un repertoire.
And specifically, uh, what was it again?
Anyway, she goes on to say this humanitarian camouflage,
good way to put it, has defacto turned Gaza into a place
without civilians where everything is destroyable
and everyone is killable.
Which by the way, that's what anybody
on us has been saying from day one.
You created the categories that they're either habas
human shields or voted for them.
So either way you look at it, they're all somewhat guilty,
which is exactly what they're all pushing.
Forensic architecture, who you should follow has done some
great work on this so far in multiple different topics.
And Israeli forces advance into rafa's densely populated
center bombing indiscriminately
and targeting what little aid medical
infrastructure remains in Gaza.
They are facing the 1.5,
forcing the 1.5 million civilians in Rafa into a
humanitarian zone in quotes,
with no functioning medical infrastructure.
They're guaranteeing they're gonna die slowly
and terribly in a location, which they can't.
And that's assuming they don't get bombed
and shot on the way or while they're there.
It says yet again, Israel's use of evacuation orders
and designation of humanitarian zones are performative acts
that in fact, in danger rather than protect civilian life.
We have been documenting these rarely weaponization
of humanitarian measures since October.
It's amazing what our own,
the supposed rules-based international order can ignore.
As part of the ongoing incursion to Rafa,
the Israeli military has closed all remaining points
of entry for aid into Gaza.
Oh, and that was, I'm glad I remembered that. Sorry.
And that's, that's a good place to point out.
Anyway, so this is the newest one as
of yesterday from the OCHA from the United Nations.
Remember how Elon, he's, he's weirdly in telling
and clearly why I know why trailed off
with this push about the aid, which now that I say this,
watch him kick back into gear tomorrow with KGA about
how they've got more food than they ever had in their
lifetimes, despite the fact that you can prove
that's not true with this entire breakdown.
But check out this last couple of the last weeks,
look at this just again,
in case you don't remember 500 truckloads including fuel
before October 7th,
and they were still dangerously food insecure
that has never been surpassed.
Once the blue you're looking at is the daily average.
So if they did 500 trucks before
and it was food insecure at that point,
they guaranteed a slow starvation and famine by doing this.
That was the plan. Now look at this.
May 10th zero, May 11th, sixth,
and I guarantee you that didn't come from anything Israeli
related, probably around them in ever whatever way from
doctors, whoever else May 12th through the 15th zero
that is day after day
after day of literally nothing while they are in famine.
How else do you ascribe that?
That's deliberate collective punishment, starvation,
genocide, no way around it.
And let's realize, by the way, on October 20th,
I showed this so many times they,
amnesty International looked just
between the seventh and 12th of October.
On October 20th, just those few days.
And on October 20th, 2023, they already deemed
that they were murdering civilians without any due diligence
in the sense meaning they weren't telling them they were
coming, they weren't telling, they weren't like,
there was multiple examples that they were targeting them,
directly murdering them because they were trying to,
in some cases they said they were
not taking appropriate precautions
or just in general, just indiscriminately bombing, all
of which was proven damning evidence
of war crimes is Israeli attacks wipe out entire families
October 20th, and yet here we are seven months later.
Lastly, I'll finish with some of these.
I think it's important to see these sets of news
report by Channel four news.
So mainstream Israeli media on the murder
of a disabled Palestinian with learning difficulties.
It just, it's so many of these, it's, it's, it's every one
of them matter, but it's sad
how they blend into the background
because these individual examples are so effing common daily
and long before October 7th is far back as you wanna look.
I'll just play an opening part of this.
- The incident lasts just 20 seconds,
but it tells a tragically familiar story of life
and death in the West Bank.
A young Palestinian man is seen throwing stones towards
what appear to be Israeli soldiers.
Seconds later, the man falls to the ground. Motionless.
27-year-old Ard Abba, a disabled man from the town
of Yaar in Hebron, was killed
by a single bullet through his neck.
A man born with medical complications whose family fought
desperately to keep him alive, only
to lose him in an instant,
another death in a seemingly endless conflict.
But this particular tragedy was one
that we'd already stumbled across,
although we didn't realize it at the time.
On October the 30th, our team set out from our hotel
for Heon in the south of the occupied West Bank,
also films the mosque and the Israeli watched,
and others who feel forced off their ancestral lands
by armed Israeli settlers.
After several hours, we returned to the same checkpoint.
Just before we arrive at 11 42, 10
security footage shows throughout throwing a stone toward
what appear to be Israeli troops.
The timestamp on the CCTV reads 12
because the clocks went back by now that weekend
and had not yet been updated.
32 seconds later, he throws another stone.
Then one of the men in fatigues CROs down
at 1143 exactly f had, is shot
his body slumps to the ground.
The uniformed man crouching then stands up
- Now realize that they have policy for this.
Remember even Donald Trump argued
that at the border people are throwing
rocks that they could be shot.
Like where do you think that comes from?
There's not acceptable.
Nobody, nobody in any, like,
they wouldn't say this on mainstream media
because they know that most people would think it's
detestable, but they, in, in plenty
of circles, they make arguments.
People like Brian Mast will argue they deserved it.
That's the kind of thing he's been proudly saying.
- This is the spot where Fah died.
The CCTV camera filmed this checkpoint.
- I'll just leave it there. I mean just, uh,
you make sure you watch this.
It's an, it's a good breakdown, sad, disgusting,
but it's important good in the sense
that it's important to understand it's happening.
Now, team, the YouTube here, age restricted the video.
Gee, I wonder why. And by the way, it says they also seem
to be hiding the share button.
Do you realize how disgusting this is?
I mean, guys, this is deliberate suppression
of provable examples of war crimes.
How crazy is that?
That's what's happening. It's coordinated.
Now, speaking of shooting a kid, a, a kid
through the neck seems to be a pattern.
A child is shot in the neck for no reason
by Israeli occupation forces in the West Bank,
not Gaza in the West Bank.
He was then detained, not treated, lucky, he's still alive,
then left at a hospital alone.
Now the family has thousands in hospital bills.
Normal day for a Palestinian occupied West Bank.
- I was playing on a scooter with my cousin.
He says we were on our way home when we saw an Israeli
jeep driving towards us.
So we started running. It is an instinct every
Palestinian child knows.
Well, soldiers began shooting.
Jude was hit in the neck and fell.
- And that's the story guys. This is reported all across.
The point is that they're gonna say, well, he was running,
I thought he was a terrorist.
And that somehow is acceptable to most people
that support the Israeli Zionist agenda.
In what world does a so-called democracy shoot children the
back, whatever the assumption, this is where we are.
- He says in that moment, he felt very far from home.
It happened near the AK Jabba refugee camp near Jericho.
In the occupied West Bank soldiers detained,
the wounded boy accusing him
of throwing rocks and pipe bombs.
- See, because it gets conflated with pipe bombs,
even though he was riding a scooter around
that, even throwing rocks.
Think about how crazy that is. And this is acceptable.
- Before leaving him at an Israeli hospital, terrified
and alone, it was hours before his family knew where he was.
- Every day, whenever they'd administer any kind
of treatment, they'd ask my wife to sign bills.
They'd say, we want money. You must pay.
They were giving us a really hard time.
Every time they'd administer treatment,
they made it very difficult.
- He's out of the woods but has nerve damage
and can't move his left arm.
The Israeli hospital where he was treated claims they are
owed more than $13,000 for treating an 8-year-old child
with a gunshot wound from an Israeli assault rifle.
Before Jude was brought back, his family says,
Israeli hospital staff even tried
to take the neck collar protecting his wound.
My God, his father says The bill is
so high it will be impossible to pay.
Palestinian officials told Al Jazeera
that in situations like this, Israel deducts the funds
directly from customs taxes that it collects on behalf
of the Palestinian authority.
Jesus, when asked if he was scared, he puts on a brave face.
He says he's looking forward to going home, having a shower
and seeing his grandparents.
But he says he'll never ride a scooter again.
A lesson every Palestinian child learns too soon.
It is never safe to play outside
when you live under Israeli occupation.
Zain Basra Al Jazeera Ramah, the occupied West Bank, Stein
- Israel Abdul, uh, from Euro ed Human Rights Group
just did a quick side note about West Bank.
Israeli Army Central Command Chief points out the army has
now stopped regulating Jewish construction in the West Bank.
You know, the illegal settlements,
which nobody in the world other than
Israel argues are legal.
Even the US has asked 'em to tone it down,
but of course done nothing to stop it
because go ahead and commit your crimes.
We'll just plead with you to stop,
but then not do anything to stop you.
Sort of like the genocide, which barely even doing that.
But under orders from the Ministry Ministry of the Ministry
of Defense, Benny Gantz, of course orders though have been
issued to enforce the law only on Palestinian construction.
So what can, can you tell me again out there world about
how you have equal rights in this place?
Well, see, that was the whole lie is they pretend, they kind
of omit the Gaza discussion acting like they're all equal
there, even though that's provably not true.
And here's another example. Now
of course they're gonna say it's only because of them.
We are evil Palestinians and they're attacking us.
And so wait a minute.
So at the same time, you're protecting the good ones from
the Hamas, but then at the same time you're collectively
adding them all to the same every time that happens.
You, if you go through this conversation long enough,
the very person acting like they're trying
to save the good ones from a loss will 30 seconds later wipe
them all away as all bad people
because, well, they voted for 'em or whatever else.
The bottom line is, this is not international law,
even domestic law, if you're pretending the laws
that are supposed to be there, a democracy
or whatever else we're talking about, this is criminal.
You're occupying TT territory that's Palestinian.
You are then building on that territory, which even more
so is illegal in every possible sense.
And then on top of that, you're removing any kind
of regulation that might have been there.
So now these are the people that are shooting, raping
and pillaging, which most
of the corporate media have covered the,
the illegal settlers
and now they've just removed any kind
of regulation that might have been there.
My God. And only enforcing law against
these bad Palestinians.
Welcome to democracy.
Here's another example of an individual being shot Jonas
to punched another of a countless string of examples
of innocent children unarmed being shot
because they're there and Palestinian.
So you can see that he is essentially trying to help
what looks like somebody else that was shot
and then get shot, which is what they continue to do.
Unarmed, clearly nothing in his arms.
Y Yi is doing good work on the ground,
continuing to cover this stuff.
Alan Rahi points out to do this to one child, you need
to be a psychopath to do this to 15,000 children, you need
to be a psychopath armed and protected by a superpower.
Her name is Al Rital. She's only four years old.
She survived an Israeli airstrike on
her house in Gaza yesterday.
Thank God she's alive now Chris
Fitzgerald points out Israel
and his cheerleaders have gone from, we don't kill civilians
to, we kill civilians because they deserve it.
Now this is not a new thing,
this has been happening the whole time, but he's good.
He's, it's good on him to highlight the fact that
they're now publishing articles.
This is Alan Dershowitz.
Just how many of Gaza's civilians are entirely innocent.
It just really makes my skin crawl.
That dershowitz of all people has the nial
to stand there on some kind of moral platform
and act like you can cast down judgment.
How innocent are they entire? How?
How many of them are entirely innocent?
Lemme ask you a question. How many, any anybody?
How many human beings are entirely innocent?
Especially someone like Alan Dershowitz?
How many pe, how many Americans right now?
Because you know I'm entirely innocent.
I mean for, for it just really makes me angry
that we're talking about people who are being slaughtered
and you're gonna stand back and try
what you're doing right now is trying
to justify this even in some small measure.
Well, how many of them are really innocent?
This is the worst human being alive in my mind right now.
The kind of person that can stand back
and know what he's doing
and pretend that even if you think everything
that ever said is true, that somehow you're gonna argue
that, well most of them are pretty gross.
Anyway, that's what you're doing.
This person needs to be cast out
of society as far as I'm concerned.
These are the kind of people that we need
to recognize as a problem.
Now I'm being facetious when I say that.
My point is that as a reality, we need to highlight that.
That's the kind of free
speech point that I'm making in general.
Use the free speech, make sure you stand there in every
possible way and si you are a horrible, disgusting, lowest
of the low human being.
A human being is being. Is being kind. Everybody.
The problem is there's far too many people in powerful
positions and the two party illusion
that will protect people like this.
Like they protected Epstein, like they protected Weinstein,
like they protected a lot of them.
Ada points out that on top of all this,
after everything, you know the few examples we just showed
you, but they're endless of the murder
and the destruction IDF is admitting Hamas will remain
after all this butchering, destruction and starvation.
Hamas will alway as he writes.
Hamas was always the pretext Palestinians, the target.
As the article writes, the army admits in Hebrew article,
even after the operations in raids
and Rafa, Hamas will remain in the city.
By the way, this has been admitted
by many different people in the IDF and out.
So what's the point? Clearly it's not about stopping the bad
Hamas, it's about destabilization.
It is about ethnic cleansing,
it's about continued settlements.
It is about destroying Palestinian life.
And by the way, here's what that looks like.
As she writes, this is not a war in God, it's a genocide.
Repeat it, spread it.
Let the world know this is con Eunice for you.
Tell me this is not, tell me,
this is pinpoint targeting him on
My God, look at that.
I mean, just this first shot right there. Look at that guys.
That is leveled.
And then you pull back, it's even more leveled further,
it's one building standing there.
My God, nobody with compassion
or I mean just, I mean, I shouldn't say things like that.
It's just so hard for me for emotionally, you know, like
to see that anybody can knowingly
pretend that this makes sense.
Like I could guess I could see somewhere
where somebody just somehow doesn't see it.
Because like the media personalities out there
that push the lies we just showed you in regard
to the numbers and just, or too,
too willfully ignorant to see it.
But how anybody who's not just a, a
complete sociopath psychopath,
borderline psychopath can act like this makes sense
or even downplay it.
Write entire articles about how maybe they're all not
that innocent as you might think.
Just remember these people.
Now, I wanna end today with a
six minute clip about the history of Palestine.
Just to remember that this is what we're coming from.
This is what, it's not just October 7th forward.
These people have lived through atrocity after atrocity
and all they do is get gaslit lied about, called terrorist,
suppressed killed.
And then when they do anything to fight back,
they get called terrorists yet again.
Or even if they fight through some legal channel,
they get called terrorists for the BDS movement.
They getter, uh, college kids,
Jewish people get called terrorists
for standing up for Palestine.
Holocaust survivors will get called trash
or useless idiots by people like Ben Shapiro simply
because they don't share his Zionist opinions.
We need to start calling this stuff out.
Find the courage to not be cowered along by threats,
false threats of antisemitism or racism.
You know your heart. You know what you believe in.
You know who you care about.
Don't let these cowards
and subhuman people push you into thinking.
You're not supposed to call out.
What is the most obvious thing you've ever seen?
Now is the time to find the courage to stand up
for the people that desperately need you.
Right? Now, I was gonna get into a point somebody made.
I'm gonna do another show about the Holocaust overlap
and the point being, you know, just this popped in my mind
because of it, but the reality of the statement is true.
You know what you would've done, whether it's the Holocaust
or any other past example, what you're doing now will define
how you are looked at in the, in the future.
What you would've done, what you're doing now is
what you would've done in the face of those atrocities.
The point is somebody else, one
of these Zionist propagandists literally on the yesterday,
which was the hit the anniversary of the Nakba,
which historically Israel pushes out all this propaganda
about the Holocaust to cover that story.
And I just mean propaganda in the sense that, you know,
whether true or not is up to you to decide,
but that it's to cover the other story is my point.
But they literally on that day highlighted this saying,
here is a woman who got kidnapped on the
seventh showing that image.
The fa one of the few that you can see as much as they try
to hype it out is something bigger and saying,
here's a picture of the Holocaust.
You now know what you would've done the go the nerve
of somebody to say that after seven months of ongoing murder
and and war crimes that are clearly amounting to genocide,
pointing to one day
and saying, you now know if you're not ignoring everything
happening in Gaza and only talking about this one day,
you now know that you wouldn't have been on the right side.
That's what he was doing. And it just really unnerves me
to see that people can make those kind of arguments
and that if he believes it, that scares me.
If they're lying about it, that's horrifying.
Pretending like you are currently on the wrong side
of history, if you're highlighting the genocide going on,
never again means only care about this one group
of people is apparently what they're saying.
The UN representative spoke up
and said that recently, I played the clip for you,
never again means attacking anti-Jewish haters.
That's basically what he said. Paraphrasing.
Is that what it means? I thought never again meant don't let
genocide happen to anybody.
In fact, that's what the honest Jewish people within this
community are fully saying right now.
The many clips of the Jewish people along the protest,
the Holocaust survivors saying never again means never again
for anybody as they point to Israel
and what they're doing in Gaza.
Time to stand up, time to find the courage.
Thank you for continuing to support this platform. Guys.
Never be able to fully express how much it means to me
that you guys have continued to support us, to the point to
where we will continue to grow even in the face
of suppression, even in the face of legal attacks
and everything else that we'll probably follow.
Thank you. I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
- Amid the fabled hills
of Judea in southwest Asia stands Jerusalem the
capital of Palestine.
- Palestine was a thriving populous country
with a strong economy, with a political life,
with a very strong culture, very diverse, very tolerance
going back as long as far as history can record
- The British - Government's policy in Palestine,
a policy which if continued would surely have
as a result the replacement of the Arabs by the Jews.
- The - British government imposed the Belfor declaration,
which is aboard by all Arabs in the Near East.
- As a new Jewish state is born,
- It's the nakba, which means catastrophe In Arabic,
- A world story that feels that put out
with gas came from tackle grace, it urban
to defend the faith.
After so much of travel and effort and sacrifice
and longing prayer through the centuries.
That's finally by the grace of God in
Greek country. Stop the
- War in Palestine,
the
- Murder of the United Nations.
Mediator count Bernard
- TA.
Troops have driven the out of doubt of the league
of city. Taking many prison.
- Jaffa itself has become an almost deserted city.
Most of the 70,000 inhabitants having left when the state
of Israel was pro portrayed,
- Entire cities were taken entire cities, Haifa,
Rumley lived, Baffa, a Jerusalem, on and on and on.
Entire cities,
- Your mass media, the west mass media always
beside Israelis.
- And you are forgetting completely this organized
tourism. You refuse to
- Condemn this bare burden attack on the
source of your pleasant. And you said
- That we accept the raid,
but it was little bit more than required.
- I don't see any possibility to move forward
with the peace process and no doubt to arrive to peace
unless all those terrorists will be eliminated.
I came here with the message of
- Peace,
- Cannot do some, uh,
to some, uh, homework.
- And if I don't steal it, someone else is gonna steal this.
Do you condemn?
- We'll stand with you in solidarity and we want
- You to win.
We stand
- With Israel.