- Uh, Zionism is racism.
Israel cannot be both.
Israel is either a racist Jewish state,
or it's a democratic state for everybody.
And that's what I would like Israel to be.
I would like a Democratic solution.
One state with equal rights for, um, uh,
all its inhabitants.
Uh, your organization.
Human Rights Watch issued a report last year, uh,
about Israel.
Mm-Hmm. . And the conclusion was it is
an apartheid state.
And, and there are four major
human rights groups in the last two years
who issued similar reports, which the same conclusion.
Israel is an apartheid state.
So apartheid is racism,
apartheid is discrimination.
But Israel is the only member
of the United Nations that I know,
which is officially racist.
And I say this because of the, uh,
July, 2018 nation state law, which says
The Jews have a unique, unique right
to self-determination.
Mm-Hmm. in Israel, unique means exclusive.
Yes. It means Arabs have no right to self-determination.
Mm-Hmm. . It means even if Arabs became
a majority Mm-Hmm.
, they would still have no right
to self-determination.
Mm-Hmm. . So, most certainly, Zionism is a, um,
is a racist ideology.
Mm-Hmm. . And it is largely responsible
for the Akbar that has unfolded throughout the last century
and continues today.
- Welcome to the daily wrap up. A concise
- Show dedicated to bringing
- You the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours.
- Monday, May 13th, 2024. Thank you for joining me today.
I have a pretty good grouping of information
that I don't want to take long today,
so I'm gonna try to jump right into it.
But I have two quick things that I wanna start with.
One, my really, I, I personally think is a really important
powerful follow up interview with Zachary Foster, PhD,
PhD from Princeton in Palestinian history.
We recorded that a few days ago.
As you guys know, there's a lot up in the air
for me right now, and unfortunately, and,
and then I didn't kind of plan for Mother's Day.
And so ultimately that hasn't gotten played yet.
My plan is to play that tomorrow.
I'm getting the show done
today, and I'll be playing that tomorrow.
So make sure you keep in, uh, keep your eyes out for that.
And we'll, I'll include the link to the older,
older one in today's show.
Um, and again, as well, the reason, like right now, uh,
as I've said many times that I wanna kind
of keep you guys updated, that the, the shifting
of the location, which we'll be changing
is still kind of up in the air.
A couple hitches here and there, but I'm gonna be b boun
kind of bouncing back and forth.
Hopefully by the end of the next week
we'll be in our new location.
And on that note, in general, for those
that haven't seen the, the follow up on this, that
what we're ultimately doing is shifting locations,
which will save Tlab a ton of money in the long run
for a couple of, you know, pretty minor costs right now,
out going forward, ultimately, in, in interest of
where we're going with all these lawsuits
and everything, just trying to find ways to,
to fine tune everything and,
and minimize costs as be most, as, uh, as much as possible.
As somebody recently asked if I wanted
to make sure we understand that
that move is not some kind of expenditure.
It's really about the long-term, decrease in overall costs.
That's why it's kind of multiple things
going into one location.
And that's all because of you guys.
We wouldn't be able to do any of this without your support.
Um, so in general, today we're gonna be focusing
on a couple important things.
One thing that stood out to me that,
and it, it's not like this needs to be focused on today
with all that's going on, but I think it's really important
as we've been doing here and there, a lot of these topics
around Zionism,
understanding the historical realities of these.
And that's one of the reasons why Zach,
multiple interviews are very important.
And I wanted to talk about the idea
of settler colonialism today in regard to
how it's the reality around Zionism.
And it's like most of the things we've discussed on this
show, it's provable.
It's the obvious historical reality statements from the
United Nations, the founders of Zionism itself.
And it as usual,
highlighting these provable facts somehow makes me into
somebody that hates Jews, which is just so
continually perverse into
and frustrating as it's obviously not who I am as a person,
or most people right now,
calling out the reality of what's going on.
All of the protests we'll discuss in the latter half
of the show, as we've said many times, it's obs, it's absurd
and insulting to the people going through this
and the many Holocaust survivors
that are taking part in these protests
to just call it all Jew hatred and antisemitism.
And again, I'm gonna make a point about a couple
things important today.
People that I respect, people, I would,
let's just say in the context of COVID-19 coverage,
that I just don't get how the personal aspect
of this comes into play, where people,
we'll get into it when I get to the point about it.
But the idea of accusing somebody, of being like,
not just antisemetic, but saying you hate Jewish people.
Somebody that at the very least you were on similar paths
with around the COVID-19 conversation.
And even without even the opening possibility
that assuming they're correct,
that maybe I just don't see something or were misled.
That's, again, that's, you know, the reality being
that I think the obvious factual information is on our side
of this conversation, but it, it amazes me to see
otherwise logical and intelligent people irrationally lash
out at others for highlighting things that we can prove
or simply going, we care about what's going on
to the people in Gaza.
And somehow that gets translated
into you hating Jewish people.
And it's just this, it makes you wonder if they were ever
intelligent or if this is just a special kind
of manipulation that reduces people's
ability to see through things.
I mean, it's the same as the two party illusion, same
as any number of these things.
Like with COVID-19, it was not a partisan divide.
Right Now we're watching Jewish people, Muslims, Christians,
religions around the world, people that are eth uh,
atheists, what, you know, everybody seemingly lining up
to support the reality that people in Palestine have a right
to self-determination, just like Israelis do.
They, everybody, that's the reality.
It, it is the same idea of saying
that one matters more than the other,
or saying that all of them do is somehow racist.
It's politics and it's always dragging us down.
We're also gonna talk about some other important points
around all of this in regard to, uh, the
food aid conversation.
An important discussion
around the United Nations have the first, as far
as I can tell, anyway, international staff member,
not un rra, not somebody who was in, not a Palestinian
that works through the un, but an international UN member
was just killed by Israel.
And of course it's gonna be some other sidestep,
some AC accusation of Hamas being responsible,
some misidentification, or at the very least,
or most, I guess at the end of the day, it would be
that we misidentified and we didn't mean to,
and it's still their fault because they were the
ones that created the situation.
No, accountability is the point
and plenty of other things we're gonna get into.
So stay tuned. I'm gonna try to do this as quickly
as I can today for obvious reasons.
Well, not to you, but to me, timewise.
But I wanna start with a couple of important points
that I think I wanted just to highlight.
Peter Sweden points out some pretty big news as of today,
or I think over the last couple of days, Britain
and has, is now, you know, at least publicly,
I don't feel like I trust that this is actually
how they feel, but they're refusing
to sign the WHO Pandemic Treaty.
Now, again, let's not forget that this could just be a ploy
to rationalize some other angle of it.
Like this is something how these tend to work,
where they'll give foe pushback
or fake, you know, resistance to ultimately create the,
you know, problem reaction solution kind of dynamic.
But Slovakia is also rejecting the pandemic treaty.
So it's interesting to see though, let's, let's hope,
we should always have hope that this is exactly
what it looks like in a positive way.
That they're truly just deciding,
or at the very least, you know, shockingly acknowledging
what the peoples of these countries want, which is not that.
So wanna point that out, this is still happening,
so let's make sure we don't lose sight of what that is.
The agreement, which is essentially what it now is.
I also wanna highlight this really important development.
This is from the seventh, but this has been an ongoing
process as well as one of the reasons why a lot
of the dynamics in foreign policy are happening
because of the slowly dissolving power of the US dollar
and the US in general as a government.
But from this is in regard to bricks, India
and Nigeria finalize major partnership ditching US dollar.
Now, again, we've heard these rumblings for a decade where,
you know, as if it's about to happen
and it kind of doesn't seem to materialize.
But nonetheless, I think this is interesting.
And as I understand it,
this is not necessarily about some digital transition,
it's about using their currencies in, in exchange
or in lieu of US dollar, which I think why in the world,
whole conversation we can get into, we've had it many times,
but that's different than going to some kind of digital id,
digital dollar, which is where I worry
that was the direction.
And that's still a, I just so it's clear 100%.
I think that's where bricks and any government body is
heading at this point, but it's still good
to see them step over that.
I, the whole problem with the dollar reserve currency
for the world is it gives the US unique power over everybody
else, sanctions, financial terrorism.
And it's what they do as the
government, not the American people.
Also, I wanna, I wanna start with a point about
mis rather not even misinformation, let's put it this way,
right outta the gate, something
that I myself have probably even done and don't know it,
and a lot of us are capable of, all of us are capable
of doing, but nonetheless, still important
to make a point about that we all,
and I mean I'm even making this point to myself right now
that I need to think about this
because it's very easy right now,
more than most topics we've seen sort
of the way it was in Covid at the peak of the hysteria,
the men, the, the ridiculousness of it all,
where it was not hard to see to, it was easy to assume
that something was what it looked like right now,
for example, to see the Israeli government using everything,
it has to influence the outcome of US policy, US opinion.
And it's getting really, really obvious to the point to
where it's exposing what APAC really is exposing
what their lobbying tactics really are.
And you can't, I mean, they, they still are just call it
racism when you point to it,
but this is my point in the beginning.
These are facts. It's easy to prove.
And when they highlight in the exact same way,
which I think it's anomaly makes a good point about today,
it's the same, it's just promotion.
When we point out it in the same way,
it's antisemitism, it's ridiculous.
My point in showing you this is
because I think it's important that we don't become,
I don't wanna use the news sloppy or lazy,
but like, it would be essentially, you know,
that we don't assume, let's put it that way.
So this is opposed from a local platform channel.
Uh, I think it's a NBC channel
and it says no, Congress is not voting on a bill
that would make questioning events surrounding nine
11 terror attacks a crime.
Now, I didn't just look up a
fact check, I never would do that.
I looked into it, the article doesn't exist
and it's in regard to a New York Post article.
And on top of that, and this is usually why some people will
sidestep this and go, well, it's probably true anyway,
still not okay to share something turned into
if the article's not real.
This is a New York Post article that frames it as
Congress about to vote on making it illegal
to question my surround surrounding nine 11.
Now, we're half a step away from that when we've got YouTube
and other platforms criminalizing in a way,
while it's censoring people for
questioning things like nine 11.
And then you've got legislation
that's very borderline in regard to, you know,
words being violence in a very broad way.
Right now it's hate speech,
but realize how easy it is to turn this into hate speech.
Anything you say that it's going after a, I mean,
let's put it this way, we've seen all in the past numerous
times where they tried to make the media,
or even the government sort of like a protected class
where you're not allowed to criticize.
And so all I'm saying is we can realize
that it's not that farfetched.
So it's easy to go, that's probably true,
and share it without even looking at it.
All I'm saying is myself included, we need to be careful
because right now there's a lot of
delicate manipulations happening to try to trap people into
things that would work for the larger narrative
that might stop the awareness
that is coming like a waterfall right now.
Now for example, this is a, a ran, I don't even know
who this, this, uh, group, uh, account is on Twitter, four
to 3000 followers, and it just says
breaking Congress to vote on this bill.
Now what's interesting to me is somebody that would write
that out now all with a screenshot,
and by the way, a screenshot
that looks very clearly manipulated.
I mean, that's not even what the type looks like on New York
Post, and yet they type that out
and it says, with strong support and just make all this up.
None of this is even, there's no article.
So this comes from nothing. They just make this
up and they write this out.
The bill calls to find the, okay, they're just repeating
what it says right here on the text,
and then it says, sources expected to pass the house.
That doesn't say that down there.
So where's that coming from?
This person just randomly made up fake sources.
Yes, guys, that's how this tends to go.
There are secret squirrel sources that confirm the thing
that's gonna happen and it never happens.
That's Q anon stuff right there, not even a note whether
or not that's connected to it, just be a careful of that.
Now this we can criticize
because easily I, so I, I could have seen this shared
by somebody I respect and retweeted
it and made that mistake.
That's what I'm trying to highlight.
I this is something we could all fall into not making things
up to make that the story that's dishonest.
And then for example, I, I love Laura Be's work.
I think he's doing a great job,
but you can see how easy this is
to kind of accidentally do that.
And I myself have fallen into this trap
before such we have to be careful is all I'm saying,
people I respect and plenty of people out there would fall
for this because it's easy to think that's possible.
Now, one more note on social media.
David Ike highlights Elon Musk, who is still trying
to stand here and act like we're a free speech platform only
X resisted censoring your voice.
How can you even say that?
I mean, just think about how absurd that is.
Well, right this moment, there are people being censored
for saying things about Israel right now.
Not, not crimes saying things that they just don't like,
things that are, they claim anti-Semitic,
even though we're talking about Palestine
or in reverse, not censoring things
that are being censored on one side from the river
to the sea, apparently be,
you can't even use the word colonialism.
We'll see if this gets censored.
Elon Musk said that at the very least,
I haven't seen it enforced,
or either rather, excuse me, it was de colonialism.
I think it was crazy for someone from South Africa to argue.
But here's what David Ike says, except
for all those you shadow, ban speech, not reach awful, but,
and those posts you take down on governments say so
that you never mention, you massively boost posts
that suit you with your little comments
through your full blown algorithm
and suppress circulation of those that don't.
Some of us can see what X is about. Most cannot yet.
I agree. I agree. I mean, it's very obvious.
It doesn't mean, it doesn't mean we can't highlight when
things positive happen, but the reality is
that this is not an honest engagement guys.
And it's very clear, I think it was BX is the one
that highlighted the whole single word comments in, in far
as I can tell in timing,
that seems almost impossible for a human to be doing.
So it's just like this algorithmic bot
that's using his account, apparently just going, yes,
exactly, I agree under everyone that they wanna promote.
That doesn't seem very honest to me.
Now, suppressed news also highlights something.
This brings us into the Israel conversation
and it's highlighting what NY plaid, I think it's
how you say it, plaid or played, did a little test
and he, he writes and he cracked X.
It says, I would like to know how this is allowed,
but anything else against Israel will get suppressed.
Here's what it says. You're not gonna be surprised.
So first of all, they reviewed this
and term, they, they are, they reviewed it
and said, there does not violate any rule.
Here's what it says. It says, hi, my name is Tom.
I love to kill Palestinian and Sudanese babies.
Happy Mother's Day mom, thanks for birthing me,
birthings me without getting torn to pieces by Israels.
I, I, well, you know, whatever the point is, I love
to kill Palestinian Sudanese babies.
Good. Go ahead and say that in any context around any
that is a violation of the rules.
Now look, if you wanna really get into a context of
absolute free speech, I would, I would say you have a right
to say that even though, because you're not saying I'm going
to, I would still say you're gross for saying
that and you're a disgusting person.
Nonetheless, we're not in a platform
that deals with absolute free speech.
None of them seem to, other than the ones that we highlight
that are ab like a bit shoot for example.
But even then there's been some pretty rare examples.
My point is that if you came out
and said, I love to kill Israeli baby,
you would immediately be taken down.
You'd probably lose your entire count.
Anybody disagree with that?
There's just no way to misunderstand that.
And the same thing they did with the Christ
as king versus whatever else.
And as much as I highlighted my own issues
with the way they were doing that, like the kind
of compartmentalizing based on religion, even from a is
that you highlighted that one framing was being
deleted and one wasn't.
It's not hard to see.
They did this during the Black Lives Matter protest.
They, there's always a politically protected angle
and the platforms are involved in that as much
as they don't want you to think that, oops,
what I just hit, here we go.
Now moving forward, I wanna start with this concept
of settler colonialism
and how shockingly easy all of this is to prove.
And every single discussion we have about Zionism,
the only reason people are steering away from it,
or these media personalities to act just kind
of clumsily fall into something
and then just pull, like this is one of the best clips where
I'm surprised this was on Ms NBC, quite frankly,
but they're showing what is an undeniable provable breakdown
of land lost in regard to Israel.
There's no way around it.
Now you can dispute how it happened,
but to pretend that the land map that's been shown
by the United Nation, that is a very easy to prove reality,
which I don't even know how they dispute this lap, this
map when what we're talking about is something
that you can verb, like physically prove right now.
Again, you can dispute what was Palestine
before this, you can dispute, but nobody can actually
dispute that Israel,
or rather specifically a Zionist settler colonial project,
which will prove again, in a second took over land.
It was somebody else's whatever, whatever the youth,
whatever you, whether you wanna pretend Palestine didn't
exist or not, even though it clearly did gold maier herself
said so that they took this and that
and British mandate Belfor declaration.
And then over the years they have slowly take
and even past 67 when they'd agreed upon the different land
or they continue to take that land too.
It's so embarrassing.
And so I, there's not even a good enough word for it
because it's, it is childish, it's willfully ignorant
or actually ignorant when these people don't,
maybe they don't even realize this,
but that they're shall,
that they're just being told it's wrong by some Israeli
or, uh, you know, lobbying group
and they pull it back immediately.
Now, here, I'll read what I wrote after this,
but let's start with this clip to just show you the reality
and then show you how as IBI points, points out,
they express regret
for giving too much context about Palestine,
- Bit of history to remember.
If you look at the map, uh, we have a, a map that shows
historically the areas that used to be Palestine in 1946,
and then the UN plan there,
and then as it shrunk down
to basically Gaza in the West Bank, right?
And, and then present.
So what does that show you, Martin, that the area
where Palestinians are living,
has it grown increasingly smaller?
- Well, that's okay before we even talks, right?
So what we're supposed to assume,
which I don't know why we would today, in fact I doubt it,
but we're, what we're told the re the the illusion
around it all is that this is a news organization, right?
So somebody had to check this, right?
Aren't we always, aren't they always bleeding about
fact checking and how they exhaust their pre,
I mean we hear it all.
So we're to believe that they looked into it.
At least they didn't just grab this off some
magazine and didn't even it, right?
So they looked into it clearly.
It was very easy to find that it is real
because it's not hard to prove and they talk about it.
Neither one pushes back on it
because it's real and it's easy to prove. Absolutely.
- Of course, this is what it's all about.
It's all about the land. And what this map shows you
and I, I must say it's pretty shocking when
you present it in this way.
What it clearly shows is that if there is no piece
of agreement between Palestinians
and Israel, more of those green areas, more of
that Palestinian land will be eaten up
by Jewish settlements.
Although right now there is a, there is a freeze on,
on settlements by, by Israel
because there's so much international pressure.
The Palestinians say, if we don't have psu,
we won't have a Palestine left.
- And the Israelis say we have every right
to be in all of those areas. Well,
- The Israelis say, look, you know, this is our homeland
too, and we are Jews.
We have the right to live anywhere,
same as anywhere else in the world.
We should be allowed to live anywhere we'd like.
And that's hard to argue about.
- Well, of course what it mean, it's hard to argue about
what, you're not talking about
moving into an apartment building.
You're talking about literally taking over territory.
That's like what you're, if you're saying
that's not hard, that's hard to argue.
Then what's the difference of the,
the collective Jews read Zionist organization taking over
the United States and going, well, we can be here.
We have a right to be here. You guys can get out.
How is that different? And see,
the difference is the argument will come from a Zionist art
perspective that Palestine didn't exist
or that they moved their own accord
or that they're all terrorists.
Even though all three of those things
don't add up or work together.
But you've heard all three of them simultaneously
or different parts of the conversation.
Why? Because you throw
everything at the wall and see what sticks.
Sometimes multiple things at the same time
and you just go, oh, good pick whichever one you
like. Zionist propaganda,
- Except it's taking the land of a future Palestinian state,
which that's what the frustration
and the violence is all about, for the most part,
the occupation of their land. Last
- Thursday, in an attempt to talk about the context
for the current turmoil in the Middle East,
we showed a series of maps
of the changing geography in that region.
We realized after we went off the air,
the maps were not factually accurate
and we regret using them.
- Wow. Okay, so here's what I wrote. Isn't that shocking?
I put unreal. Those maps are verifiably correct.
And again, it's ridiculous to pretend like, I mean,
I don't even get what they're trying to dispute here is
that not the Gaza Strip is this not the Balkanized area
that once was the West Bank.
Like this is what we're talking about here it is.
Before they broke it up even more
because they built other illegal settlements, right?
Here it is when I mean you can prove this.
So it could very well be that they're just playing a word
game and there, oh, this,
there was a wrong label right there.
So it's incorrect. We're not gonna explain
to you why it's incorrect, but it's not though.
That's the insulting part.
And I said, this just demonstrates
how ridiculous corporate media truly is.
Now here's the best part about this.
We're moving from, we're moving from the conversation
whether or not this is accurate, even though that's
what we're kind of hinging on.
Either they did their due diligence, right?
Like we were discussing and just got bullied.
Somebody reached out and said, you dare you better claim
that's fake or we're gonna pull your funding,
or we're gonna have a massive ad campaign
that seems could be directly influenced
by some Zionist organization
that says we're gonna pull our ads
if you don't do X, Y, and Z.
You know, that happens.
These are companies guys, these are businesses.
These are not, uh,
public service news organizations like they began
as all those years ago, if that's even accurate.
These are companies
and businesses with boards that have stock.
They care about profit over anything else,
no matter what they tell you.
So it wouldn't be hard to imagine that
or even something darker.
But either way, or they didn't do their due diligence
and admitted that they don't research their claims.
And what makes you feel better?
'cause there's only one of two options here.
Either they did not do their due diligence on this important
thing they were talking about in a wave.
Actually that will be shocking because it actually
challenges what most news outlets know where a no-no zone,
which is Israel in general,
or they did, knew it was real, which I know that's
what happened and somebody pressured them,
somebody lit a fire under their feet
and they went, Oop, okay, pull it back the next day.
I just find that to be so wildly relevant to everything,
the media thing you're watching tonight, think to yourself,
okay, either they don't know if that's real
and they're talking about it anyway.
Or tomorrow somebody from a political position could
threaten them and they'll pretend it wasn't real.
Either way. You look at it, these people are clowns.
This is cartoonish guys. These are not real journalists.
I'm not even saying they know that.
A lot of the people in this field don't even recognize
that they're not what they think they are.
That's the whole manufacturing consent
that I recommend you look into despite Noam Chomps kind
of fall off logical in regard to COVID-19.
That conversation is still wildly important to understand
that he main point,
they wouldn't be in this positions if they didn't already
hold certain beliefs that were
necessary to the power structure.
So they don't even often realize
that they're being manipulated.
Now, here is the next one.
A great clip from, uh, Ranya shared this Ranya Col, uh,
collec, I believe it was Klik.
I actually forget what group she's in now.
She was, uh, so oh, she's part of Breakthrough News.
Now I know she was with a,
I forget which one before, but breakthrough news.
Well, she's linked here and she's calling this out.
Now what's interesting is, you know, this Emily Schrader,
who she rightly points out is seemingly trying to try to,
you know, work for her spokes Israel spokesman
or whatever, like take Elon Levy's place.
She says some things that are some worthy of ridicule
on a level of ridiculousness,
and we're gonna go over the UN documents that prove
that she's just an utter liar.
And the point is that she either is that uninformed
or is that dishonest?
Which is kind of a running theme today.
So first let's listen to the clip.
- Did you then condemn mm-hmm,
what Hamas did in October the seventh or not?
- And again, I don't, I won't,
I'm gonna let you probably play this through,
but the fact that, that this is like his little shtick
that we're even still doing that.
Like what is the true relevance of months of asking somebody
to condemn an act that happened seven months ago?
All that really does is continue to hinge the whole thing on
that one day, despite the fact that there has been
seven months of October 7th over and over and over and over
and over, over here in Gaza,
and of course 75 years before that.
But nobody cares about
that in this conversation other than run
because, well, I shouldn't say that.
I'm not sure who the other third, fourth person is,
but it just shows you how grotesque it all is.
Someone like Pierce Morgan is a very
clear narrative manager.
Again, whether he knows that
or not, it's
embarrassing that you would even keep doing that.
And he thinks it's like his thing.
He goes, yep, I keep doing that.
You know the question that's coming.
I don't know why we don't laugh about that.
Now we can have a conversation about October 7th.
In fact, we need to,
because of all the lies that keep getting spun
and how they're pretending, as much
as they keep pointing back to it, that we're not allowed
to re-litigate or even discuss the reality of all
of the lies, all of the foreknowledge, all
of the IDF killings of Israelis, all
of the many different examples of crimes that were committed
by the Israeli government in this entire process.
All of the ongoing killing of hostages in God.
I mean, you could go on forever. The lies that respond, the,
the atrocity propaganda, 40 beheaded babies,
babies on a clothes line, the entire rape conversation.
I mean the whole New York Times is imploding in regard to
that story because it's such an obvious fake.
Even the UN investigation, they keep pushing and pushing
and pushing until they're forced to go.
Look, we said it was not even investigatory,
this was not proving anything.
We didn't even level blame in anybody.
Here's Israel going, it proves everything.
I mean, you don't need to point it out.
That shows you how incredibly insecure
and desperate they truly are at this point.
They should be. They're losing.
Even Hartz wrote the article
and their own people are saying, we've lost
and we have to accept that you're not gonna hear this in the
Western audiences because this is like a wedge important
issue it seems for our entire political Well, I think
where it really shows you is the shocking influence,
Zionist influence
and Israeli influence there is on American politics,
if not completely over the top.
But on the note of do you condemn ha moss, let's get
to the point of what we're actually discussing, which is
that we're talking about a resistance.
And this is, I I would love probably why I'll never be
invited on these shows to have the opportunity
to break down very simply the reality of that, which is,
I mean, I don't, I don't know, I don't, very few people
who have made the argument I have,
and I'm not, I could be wrong, but the idea of being clear
and there are plenty I've seen them,
but there's few in the bigger conversation.
The Hamas committed crimes. You just can't argue otherwise.
You could argue that the crimes were justified,
but that's a whole nother conversation.
It still makes them crimes. The point is that you can prove
that Hamas took children back to Gaza.
That's, that's a crime. It's no matter
how minor you might think that is in the context of all
that we've seen, it's still a crime.
It's still kidnapping a child that they took as a hostage,
which is a crime that happened.
We can all see that. What I dispute is
how many people were truly killed by Hamas
or how many crimes were actually committed on that day,
but never that they didn't commit crimes.
So the point is, those are crimes that should be called out.
Obviously you've heard me say this,
but that is not the same
as saying the armed resistance was a act was legally
protected by the, for Geneva Convention.
Whether it was Palestinian Islamic Jihad,
whether it was a group of 40 random Palestinians
or whether it was a moss.
All of that will be protected under the legal act
of armed resistance just because crimes are committed.
Same point about the US military.
If you're gonna make the argument that that crime,
that guy committed along with the armed resistance,
well then the entire Iraq war was illegal
because of all the rapes and murder
and pillages that happened alongside all of it.
Or just the fact that the entire thing was based on a
lie and all illegal anyway.
But the reality being that you can't continue
to pretend like it's all one thing and
or disregard international law
as a person pretending to be a journalist.
- I don't condemn Palestinian armed resistance groups.
Just like I wouldn't condemn slaves
shooting at their plantation masters. I don't
- Condemn You made your
positioned people, it's fine, it's fine. I get it.
- Fighting their occupied, - But that's why colon,
- No, you're changing the wording
- In your, - Hang on, hang on, hang on. Everybody
- Was raping innocent civilian.
- Hang on Emily, I can - Do this. Hang on. How was that
- Resistance?
Did you love that? Hang on, Emily, I can do this.
High five, we're on the same team. I got this, let me go.
It's just pathetic. But you know,
just in case you didn't pick up her screaming over the top
of the other three people 'cause that's what you know
anyway, rape children, like they're, they're just,
they're going right to the buzzword points
that have been debunked or not proven.
They, I mean, the fact that they just so blunt,
just bluntly, the constant Hamas rapist, Hamas rapist,
terror tunnels, you know, these things that they do,
which you just, it's, it's cartoonish.
You don't need to continue to do that.
If it's not, if it the,
if you think this is a proven reality, we talk about Hamas,
well then the reality should be that they rape people.
You don't need to keep calling the Hamas rapist.
That shows you an insecurity in the conversation.
You're drilling that in. That is Nazi level propaganda.
A lie repeated becomes the truth. That's what they're doing.
Does anybody not realize that the lie
around the whole rape conversation has been utterly
and thoroughly broken down?
They've been caught lying 14 different ways.
That's not to say that somebody might not have
been sexually abused or raped.
The reality is that it hasn't been proven.
That's the reality. Even the person that they pointed to,
the only one they claim has come out
and said it has not spoken to anybody.
They did a quiet discussion,
didn't even use the word rape in the article.
And overall, I've never said it wasn't possible.
But for her to continue to just say that that's
what happened, and use that as the argument that everybody,
this is why everybody sees through this.
And I don't say that lightly.
I don't like to broad stroke anything
because I think the point is
that you can simply look at the, in the, the amount
of people, the amount of governments,
it's an objective self-evident reality.
Most people with a world
around are shockingly clear on what's happening right now.
That's why they're acting the way they are
and that's why they keep screaming the opposite.
It's pretty simple guys.
That's why we'll get to a moment
and this I'll re what I said to somebody in a minute
that well let, we'll let history be the judge.
'cause it will, I really believe that
that doesn't mean they're not gonna get away
with certain things, but I think that this has gone too far.
There's no coming back from this.
So here, once they get done with the shouting,
here's what she pushes forward.
- And I find it incredibly hypocritical
to hear Ranya talk about settler colonialism when in fact
she herself is Lebanese
and the only entity that's acting
as a colonialist entity in the Middle East is the Islamic
Republic of Iran, which is essentially colonized
Lebanon and completely destroyed it. Jesus. That
- I mean, how laughably stupid is that The only people
that would not laugh at that are people
who are Zionist manipulators that are pushing that lie.
And other political entities like US government entities
like Lindsey Graham, like Tom Cotton, who know that
that's their talking point.
There is nothing that makes that case.
Robert has broken this down 45 different ways.
Obviously they point to Hezbollah
and obviously their argument is
that Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy.
It's shockingly not even the US State Department
and other groups have in in many ways admitted
that's not the reality.
Same with, same with Hama, uh, uh, well, Hamas actually,
but same with the sala movement, same with many groups.
They just make these continual flimsy claims.
It's like Iran with nukes and everything else.
They keep screaming these same things year
after year, decade after decade.
It doesn't happen and they keep pushing it.
Anyway, the bottom line is to say that Iran is col is
colonizing Lebanon.
While you're literally openly a, a settler colonial project
that has done this to Gaza
and the US government has marched
around the world doing the same thing
to country after country.
I don't where's the evidence of that?
You can't just point to the group that you say is
what you think it is without proving that
and say, that proves my other claim.
That's just typical Zionist propaganda.
- It's colonizing kamas in the Gaza's trip.
It's a proxy of the Islamic Republic.
- See, that's all they got.
- They're the ones calling the shot.
- Oh, and and don't forget though, that Israel funds Hamas,
and we're not supposed to say that though
- Over what goes on in the Gaza Strip
and how Hamas rules over the Palestinian people.
If that's not colonialism
and imperialism, then I don't know what is.
- Yeah, then you don't know what is, I mean that's,
that was the, so she just said if Hamas ruling over Gaza is
not settler colonialism
and author, then I don't know what is.
Well how, explain for me how that subtle,
where else are they settling?
Are they moving into other areas and continuing to occupy?
No, it's been pretty much the same area the whole time.
I mean, we should all laugh at how stupid this person is.
We're just desperate. It
doesn't mean that she just doesn't know this.
I actually think she clearly does know this.
I think they just don't have any options.
You just have to deflect.
So you call a group that's been stuck
inside an open air prison for 75 or
however many years it's existed past Israel's control of it,
which probably still happens to some degree
and say that's a, that's an example
of settle or colonialism.
I mean, so again, you don't know what you're talking about
or you're this dishonest.
This is kind of the bigger reality of all
of the people we're talking about.
And here is a UN document question
of Palestine legal aspects.
There's a hell of a lot in here that I think is important.
But let's just go to the point
that I think is very relevant.
This is from 1991, again,
before we even get into it,
this is why you get these clumsy unverifiable claims that
the UN is a loss.
So people can have a a, a reason far from justifiable,
far from logical, but a reason to just dismiss this kind
of source material.
But that's how that works. And again,
I argue it's only people that want to,
and that's a very small minority in my opinion today.
And don't forget they have yet to even verify
or prove anything they claimed about UN R at all.
Canada, the United States, multiple countries,
Australia groups that are like hardcore, uh,
Israel supporters have come out
and said, sorry, you have yet to prove that UN R is in Hamas
or was part of October 7th.
And they just keep saying it. Even people in our government
keeps saying it like Brian Mast, it would just come out
as the most obvious aggressive pro Zionist,
anti-American kind of a politician.
Everything he does seems
to be unconstitutional at this point.
We'll get to that. Here's what it says though, the existence
of the Arab in Palestine once recognized,
presented no small problem to the hopeful colonizers.
Now this is the language UN is using,
but realize they're using that
because these are statements we'll get to directly made
by the founders of Zionism.
It says the Zionist solution to this quote problem,
meaning Arabs in general, as we shall see below, was to plan
for the evacuation of the Arabs from Palestine,
but the presence of the a of the Arab,
this spoiler in quotes of their dreams.
These are quotes because it's from what they said
of conquering
and colonizing Palestine was
to haunt both the Zionist founders
and their descendants in a very revealing study,
a psycho history of Zionism.
Jay goin summarizes the views of a number
of major Zionist thinkers as they address the Arab problem.
And he concludes that in the Maine,
their attitude in the Maine,
their attitude toward the Arab was to fantasize quote,
would it not be wonderful if Palestine the game
reserved for the Jews?
This is the founder of Zionism
speaking multiple points to be made here.
We're free of an Arab problem the way the game reserve
for animals in South Africa is.
Now, can we not recognize how important
that statement is Now, first and foremost, that
and actually more so the next one,
how clearly this is about occupying colonizing
and displacing ethnically cleansing.
But I really wanna drive home the point
that the founding Herzl himself, the founder
of Zionism, was an atheist.
What we're talking about even overlapping
with David Ice conversation of sabot
and the idea of idea infiltrating religions
and political groups in order to use them for their benefit.
That's the more the sabom conversation.
But our people argue it sort of the founding ID ideology
for all three Communism, Nazism and Zionism.
Nonetheless, Zionism itself
is very clearly about using Judaism.
Now people disagree with that,
but this is what I think the evidence shows in my opinion,
consider any other perspective.
But doesn't that show you right there
what we're talking about or even the idea
that this is a good one to go alongside it.
These are, I covered this in a show.
This is, these are verified documents from the ccia a
I'll just bring up the document itself where they,
where they're clearly discussing the fact the CIA is
and, and oh, this is in regard to the transformation
of the haal, you know, the,
the army committing mass atrocities against anybody, not
with the Zionist agenda at that point where it says
they are the, the Jewish agency is apparently willing
to sacrifice Jews residing in Arab countries.
Pretty simple. This is, this is from cia.gov.
You can watch the whole show yourself.
And I compare that to the Hannibal directed conversation,
which is what you're looking at with those cars.
I mean that's what we're, we're dealing with the killing
of your own people for your own agenda.
Nothing different than what the US government does,
but when it says, would it not be wonderful if Palestine
free of the Arab problem could be what it says,
the game reserved for the Jews.
Now, does that sound like somebody speaking
and the savior of the Jews or somebody who wants to use them
and corral them into some kind of game preserve to use
for their interests when need be ?
I mean I think that's pretty shockingly obvious,
but let's continue the underlying feeling.
He says the underlying feeling tone seems to be
for the Arabs to go away for the Arab question
to disappear, right?
Let's, let's get, let's get past the illusion that they were
leaving of their own accord
as people like Emily have screamed.
But it says one must build a protective shelter
around one's ardent beliefs for if one were to listen
to the Arab problem,
just the fact that they frame it that way.
That's exactly his quote right there.
And all the other problems.
One in which I imagine he means other ethnicities they don't
like one might give up the whole project.
You know, the settler colonialism project on Palestine.
It says thus it is better
to ignore certain unpleasant facts.
Maybe they go away. One as continues, oh, as one continues
to realize one's dreams.
And again, it says to be sure there were early Zionists
like, uh, ahha ham who spoke of the great mistake
of ignoring or attempting to displace
or encroach on the Arab natives.
Yeah, natives, that's what they call them.
Can't pretend like you were there first,
if you call them natives, right?
But it says, but visionaries like ham
or ham lost out two more powerful leaders
of the political Zionism like ch uh, chamber chime Wiseman
and Zeev jab jab jabotinsky who have discussed before.
He said they write who though they were in disagreement in
some areas were in agreement that the troublesome Arab,
just in general, totally not racism at all,
should not be allowed to be an obstacle
to the Zionist colonial venture.
For them, the solution to the Arab problem
was merely a question of establishing sufficient force
to still the Arab and secure their goal.
Jinky, for example, wrote
of this in an essay entitled The Iron Law in 1925.
So I guarantee even this, anybody that wants
to will dismiss it because
that's just desperation right now.
But everything else you could pretend is
mis-characterized this.
A direct quote from one of the founding leaders of Zionism,
early leaders quote, if you wish
to colonize a land in which people are already living,
you must provide a garrison for the land
or find a benefactor
who will maintain the garrison on your behalf.
Zionism is a colonizing adventure and
therefore it stands
or falls on the question of armed forces force.
There's just no misunderstanding that.
So we are actually pretending
that this complete fraud doesn't know that
or that she is lying about it.
What do you think? Either way? It's pretty terrifying.
And it goes on to say it was this troublesome fact
that Palestine already had a people, the un writes
that turned the quote dream of this.
So-called quote Jewish national liberation movement.
Even they say, so-called, I mean guys,
it's obvious this has been packed
and packed over the years with more propaganda.
I've shown you these older UN documents
that highlight very clearly the reality of this,
this so-called Jewish national Liberation movement
of Zionism into a nightmare of colonial repression
for the native Arabs of Palestine, forgiving,
forgiven this contradiction, fulfillment
of the Zionist quote dream in Palestine could only be
realized by the displacement and
or expulsion of the Native Arab population.
And this was, as we shall see,
the task the Zionist organization set out to accomplish.
I mean, does it get any more clear than that?
They expelled the people
because they were a problem for them.
They stood in the way of what they saw
as their self-determination.
And you know what? They stole it from somebody else.
That's the reality. You know,
and no one should argue that individuals don't have the
right to self-determination or that they people don't.
But the idea at this point, let's just say in, you know,
right after this started, the people had this conversation.
Yeah, the immediate right thing to do would be to say no,
you don't get to just settle on their territory.
But yes, obviously now that we've gone 75 years
because our international community have a bunch of cowards
or not powerful enough to do anything about it, we have
to realize that there are families that have been born,
children that have grown up that
are not part of this choice.
And that that's why the 67 borders were agreed upon.
And also why the Netanyahu esque government,
and he was involved at that point too, manipulated
the outcome while always pretending like it was the Arab
problem that was stopping everything.
Even though we now know that they lied about that,
that they said, if we wanna stop a two-state solution,
we have to fund the terrorists.
And then now we see what happened. They keep going.
Look at what they're doing. That's all Palestinian,
except that you funded them.
You created this reality even of your own words.
This is the problem with where we are, is
that we get shouted down by people screaming falsehoods,
some of which don't even realize that they're so wrong,
they're so ramped up.
They're so just kind of overwhelmed with the idea
of this righteous indignation
around something that they're wrong about.
And it's not to say that there's not racism
and antisemitism, but it's the idea that
what we are discussing here, clearly as you know me,
you know, the show is rooted in the truth.
It's rooted in protecting anybody, Jews and Arabs
and Christians and anything, ethnicity, religion, everybody
who is oppressed, anybody who is being misrepresented.
That's what we're here for.
Now, of course, I could be wrong.
Everything, I could be wrong about everything,
that's always possible.
But to pretend in the middle of all that,
that my secret motivation is
because I just hate Jewish people is I I repudiate that it's
so false and disgusting and they,
and it's everywhere, honest people.
And look, we've been seeing this for a long time.
The Roger Waters of the world
and the, you know, we've seen it corman over
and over people accused of antisemitism
because they said something wrong about Israel in the minds
of the people fighting for that,
ultimately the truth usually.
So this brings us to another important part of this.
First of all, Muhammad Safa points out, just so we realize
where we currently are, and this is posted on, uh, today, 2%
of the Gaza's population have been killed in seven months,
which by the way, if we're gonna break this down in the
equivalent re like based on, uh, per capita and size
and timeframe, which, which is the only way to look at this,
that when trying to compare to other past atrocities
and act like this doesn't even compare.
So why do you even care? Kind
of an argument we're getting from Zionists.
The reality is the equivalent of 2% of GA's population
to the United States is 6.5 million Americans.
So imagine there was a group fighting for their freedom.
They said, and they were bombing
and killed 6.5 million Americans.
They kept saying the US government's using human
shields, that's where we are.
Israel's seven month bombardment
of Gaza has caused more destruction than the controversial
firebombing of the German city
of Dresden near the end of the second World War.
A classic point the people reference in regard
to atrocities, but I guess it just doesn't matter,
falls on deaf ears when it comes to the people
overtaken by Zionism.
Now, right now starting with the 11th,
Gaza has been ongoing.
They're being, Rafa in particular
has been bombed relentlessly long before this, long
before they even discussed the
idea that they were doing something.
This, this i, this ploy
of a plan has not stopped their relentless bombing
of the entire area.
But let's not forget that they're also bombing into the
north, the area that they're claiming
they've had controlled.
We've seen many different arguments coming from the Israeli
idea of saying, we have it con what's the that we,
we, what was the term they used?
I'm blanking on. All of a sudden, well,
they argue they need a strategic foothold
in these different locations.
Then they argue, okay, we've gotten them, we're like,
they they do that to make the point
that they're progressing now moving forward to the cell
because behind us is secure.
How many times have we heard that they're bombing violently,
uh, like belligerently?
All around the north? All around the south?
We'll get to a moment to show you what's now happening.
They're now pushing in from every direction.
This is a guarantee to cause mass atrocities
because you are now, now you're, there's nowhere for them
to go in the, there was,
there hasn't been anywhere for them to go for a while.
Now in the context of it's all bombed out and destroyed,
but now we're talking about they have nowhere
to turn without facing another gun.
That's what we're talking about.
And this is beginning in the real sense.
I'm talking about the culmination of the real, the,
you know, let's just put it as a Rafa invasion,
however you want to think that means.
It's not just about Rafa,
but this building conversation about
bunching everybody into one area
and acting like you're trying to keep them safe
and maximizing the suffering, the starvation, the lack
of water, people that are ill, people
that are suffering already from previous bombings
and then telling 'em to move again.
Except now they can't go anywhere.
'cause you're in that area too.
They're hoping we don't see this.
Elijah Manet points out, are you aware of this?
This was on the 11th. Israel's asking Rafa,
which was about 1.5 million people, half of
what your kids under 18 to move to areas
that they already exploded, completely demolished
and in fact are still bombing places like k
Eunice dire Alah.
He says, both areas without houses are tents.
So you're moving them from a place
where they already have some structures they put together,
you're, you're forcing them on a fly to go to a place
where they don't have anything
that you've already destroyed completely without water,
electricity, food crossings are all closed.
No medical care. How do we think this is gonna go?
Civilians and jli, refugee camp north of Gaza,
were also being asked to move after they bombed 'em.
Of course, to where Israel's bombing the same place
as it bombed in October and November.
That's my point. There's nowhere for them to go in the sense
of actually being bombed and we know this,
but despite that, they've been bombing on the way they've
been bombing the places they go to,
they've been bombing the safe areas, designated as safe.
They bomb, they they bomb food aid convoys
after they explicitly tell them,
we're moving, are we okay to go?
They say, yes you are. They start driving.
They bomb 'em on the street three times. That's been proven.
Now. It says the occupying force forces are obliged
to move civilians to safe areas.
There is no safe areas and left in Gaza. What are we doing?
Good question. Vanessa Biley highlights this.
Palestinian refugees are now being pushed from one
destroyed area to another.
The Zionists allow them no respite.
That's part of the torture here guys. This is hatred.
As you've heard them say themselves, the individual people,
this is about punishing them.
We should kill them all. None of them are innocent.
You've heard this from most of the Israeli government,
and yet we're acting like we don't have intent for genocide.
The Zionists allow them no respite.
Rafa is no longer a safe area. It never was, in my opinion.
Civilians are flee, fleeing to ka, which
is completely destroyed.
This is what it looks like. This is where they're being told
to go to a completely bombed out area.
It's already, I mean, think about this.
You've got dead bodies all over the place eating, eaten
by animals, causing disease.
You've got no water, no food, no medicine.
It's dirty as hell. There's, I mean,
how do you think this is gonna go?
I don't, let's just even pretend obscenely
that somehow they do care about these people.
What they're doing here is guaranteed to make them die.
If this goes on long enough, these people will all die.
That's what we're watching happen.
Whether it's from illness
or just any number of other things
that they're seemingly manufacturing.
And it says there is no water,
electricity, or shelter from the summer.
Heat, right? Heat stroke, everything or the bombs or shells
or drones or bullets or everything that's falling on them.
The wasteland at this point,
as she writes, here's un unreal.
This is from the 11th as well.
These are the photos from today on the 11th, families
and children returning to the unschool in uni
to seek safety and shelter.
Except it's torched out completely.
The walls are blowing out. There's rubble everywhere.
The situation is unfolding under the world's watch.
This is what they came back to.
What do you think they're supposed to do?
And then ask yourself too.
Why, why did they make sure that they bombed out every room?
You know why? We'll show you some examples in a minute.
This is not about Hamas. There's an endless string.
If there's ever any justice in this world,
whether it's the ICJ or the ICC,
they have posted endless examples of them going in,
proving there's no Hamas and then demolishing the building.
Anyway, all of these are war crimes.
Sarah Wilkinson highlights a member of this is, um,
Sam Rose from the, from ra,
simply highlighting they're exhausted,
degraded being tortured Israeli tanks and missiles
and sniping increases as they're on their way
to the supposed safe zone, which is also not safe. People
- Hear fear and intensification of the situation
because it is already very desperate.
We've, we've suffered relentless artillery strikes,
airstrikes tank shells over the past four
or five days of populations, exhausted,
degraded, humiliated.
Approximately 150,000 people now we believe are on the move,
have left the evacuation area
and also the area beyond the evacuation area.
So lots and lots of people on their move on, on the move,
fearing the worst and fleeing for safety
- And having a hard time figuring out, obviously
as they're fleeing where to go.
As we know, the un warning, the situation is reaching,
quote, even more unprecedented levels of emergency.
- How can you report that with a straight face?
First of all, unprecedented is unprecedented to say,
even more unprecedented.
I mean, it's just crazy to me that we're at a point now
where we're, we're it, it was a unprecedented at any moment.
And we're now going, it's even more unprecedented today.
We're all failing every single.
If we're the fact that this keeps going at this point, it's,
it's just obscene.
I mean, this is why it's increasingly difficult for those
of us that are still trying to highlight this
to just make sense of any of it.
How in the hell this is even possible.
But you know, sadly,
I've already pretty jaded about the world
and it's only enshrined.
It only makes it clear to me
that I'm not necessarily wrong about at least
some portion of the world.
It's pretty dark. But I also believe quite strongly,
and this is ev evidenced by the latter half of today's show,
that more good exists in the world than not.
And they are clearly outnumbered and terrified,
but doesn't stop the suffering like this
that's happening to individuals.
- Times of a life I
of a life I not.
- So this is a Palestinian pleading for end
to what's going on after finding out they have
to be displaced again for, for some of these people.
The sixth, seventh time every day she says,
we're being displaced to another place.
See, that's the thing is we don't hear
that they're being pushed around by the people
with guns every day.
Just 'cause there's these mass movement moments
where they dump a lot of leaflets and push people
and there's a big display about
how they're keeping everybody
safe. That's not what's happening.
- Could you?
- Where do we have to go?
Take God? No one standing with us.
Where are the Arab countries
- Supposed?
- Don't they know what's happening to us?
Anyone who can help us?
It's just so hard to watch all this and,
and not, you know, these are just random people,
just real people with lives and dreams
and just destroyed everything.
They're entire lives. They've got no homes, no, no jobs.
I mean, this is, do you,
they have utterly destroyed everything that they were
other than what they can move along in a bag.
And remember, and this is not the first time guys.
This goes back decades over and over.
And yet the saddest part is
that it seems like everybody knows that
and we just still somehow can't stop it.
Here's another example. This is a person pointing out.
He personally and his family have been displaced since
October 7th, six times.
Six times. It says we've been
displaced for the sixth time.
We couldn't find anywhere
to go except my aunt's bombed house
in the destroyed con units.
No water, no electricity, no internet.
I don't know what's next. He says, all I want is for the war
to end for my sister to continue their education.
Francesca Albany highlights in over 30 years,
or first of all, another un ur on the right
to housing says over 30 years of studying
and engaging with communities affected by displaced.
I've never seen a shocking atrocity like this.
Multiple forced displacement
of generations compelled to be on the run.
And ma, the commissioner, general vra again
and again, the exodus continues.
The Israeli authorities continue
to issue forced displacement orders, all
of which are crimes no matter what.
Their narrative is, also known as evacuation orders.
This is a force to forcing people in Rafa
to flee anywhere and everywhere.
They don't even have a plan, which is obvious.
They're just making these people suffer,
shooting 'em occasionally, no matter
where they go buying 'em occasionally, no matter
where they go, raping, pillaging, murdering,
and they are starving to death along the way
since the war began,
most people in Gaza have moved multiple times
on an average of once a month.
They desperately sought safety and they never found.
Francesca Albanese writes,
she's never seen anything like it either.
Shocking, atrocity, televised, day after day, rationalized
and condoned by most Western countries
and tolerated by most of the rest.
What a shameful low we have reached.
May the Palestinians forgive us for a ridiculous,
pathetic inability to enforce humanity
and the law supposed to protect it.
Max Blumenthal writes, four Israel forces are back in Gili.
This was on the 12th, this was yesterday.
You know, the place where they bond killed 400 innocent
people, even of their own admission to allegedly go
after one Hamas member
that didn't even turn out to be there.
They admitted that publicly.
They've been much more careful about that
after the fact acting like, well, we don't know.
They're probably all Hamas.
But on the record with Wolf Blitzer,
they made it clear those were all innocent people,
but they were going after the Hamas member.
So it was justified. Even
Wolf Blitzer couldn't swallow that.
These are disgusting, disgusting criminals.
Not every Israeli or every Jew,
but clearly the ones that are committing
crimes, we can't deny this.
Israeli forces are backing their refugee camp of Giulia
after bombarding the camp.
Not this is long pa after this 400 killing.
This has been recent, ongoing over the last week,
bombarding the camp full of innocent people refugee camp.
They're seeking another strategic hold.
They claim after claiming one a month, months ago,
and taking bodies as they go in.
So if they establish a strategic hold, are we to a mat
to assume they failed?
They lose. Did Hamas win there? Are they taking it back?
It doesn't matter, honestly,
I don't think it's even about any of that.
I think it's just about choosing periodically
to make sure people aren't comfortable in, uh, in so far
as they can be comfortable in an ongoing war zone.
It says, beyond the savagery of this latest assault,
the lesson is that Israel's military simply cannot eliminate
Hamas as a visible entity in Gaza.
They are losers who have failed
to achieve all major objectives since October 7th.
This is yet another failed us back regime change operation
complimented by cor, of course, by genocide
and regional destabilization.
I've seen reports of them floating the idea
of bringing in American mercenary groups like
Academy Blackwater.
But I have yet to see that confirmed.
I'm waiting to see that more so,
but it wouldn't surprise me at this point.
I saw Rod points out, same thing.
Remember when the attacking refugee camp
was supposed to be a big deal?
Nonstop is barely shelling. This was on the 13th, right?
So he reports at the 12th. It's been ongoing for a week.
So how are you tough? If you've been bombing Jubilee Refugee
Camp for a week on yesterday, uh, two days ago,
you were bombing it relentlessly.
Here it is today, continuing to bomb it relentlessly.
What do you, what's the accomplishment here?
Are we gonna pretend that a week's bombing
of one location, this is torture.
This is about maintaining control and fear.
As you've heard, IDF members make very clear they rate
houses in the middle of the night just to
make sure they know we're there.
This is the idea ideology.
Now, the nation writes, Rafa is in a panic
as the Israeli invasion begins.
Now, here is what we're seeing from Reuters as of today.
Not just from the South, not just Rafa.
As we're keep being told it's the last stronghold, right?
And how do you explain everything else?
It it, I mean, it takes a special kind of willful ignorance
for seemingly the entire Western media to ignore the fact
that, and by the way, they're still reporting the Rafa,
the last stronghold, the Homa.
And we have to have a plan
and all these dumb talking points.
Okay? Then why are they bombing in the north?
Why are they bombing the refugee camp?
Why are they, why are they doing everything else
to do If it's not, if that's the last stronghold,
they should, everything should be focused on Rafa, right?
No, it's about destroying everything that was Palestine.
Now Israeli forces are pushing into
Gaza from the north and the south.
How do you make sense of that? With every
other narrative we've ever gotten?
They're lying. Is how you make sense of that.
They're doing whatever they want
and lying, do whatever they're people out there pretend
they're holding them accountable like a
Pierce Morgan, for example.
And here's what it says. The wounded a
and sick suffer a slow death
because there is no treatment and supplies.
They cannot travel, but they're forcing 'em
to anyway, right?
They're making these people from sick beds and wheelchairs
and people that have legs blown off.
We get outta the way we're trying to save you.
And if you don't, we'll bomb you
anyway 'cause we're trying to save you.
It says in Northern Gaza, Jublia,
a sprawling refugee camp built 75 years ago, you know,
back when the original occupation began
to house Palestinian refugees from what is now Israel,
residents fled along, rubble, strewn streets, carrying bags
of belongings, tank shells landed in the center of the camp,
and airstrikes destroyed clusters of houses.
I guess we're just to assume it's all
Hamas human shields, right?
We don't even pretend that game is happening anymore.
It's just an unspoken reality apparently,
even though we've never proven it.
Health officials said they have recovered 20 bodies
of Palestinians killed overnight.
Must have all been human shields, right?
Do we even ask that anymore?
I think, I think the, the sad realization is
that we all acknow,
even though the certain characters pretend it's not realized
that everybody everywhere knows this is murder,
knows it's genocide, knows they're
just killing Palestinians.
Every human rights group, every un body,
everybody anywhere we're standing
has been very clear about this.
So just we're, they're killing Palestinians.
We're not gonna do anything about it.
But once this all dies away,
we'll we'll make sure somebody gets accountable
for Netanyahu goes to jail,
but we all go right back to the killing.
They're not even trying to hide the reality anymore.
He says, quote, we don't know where to go.
We have been displaced from one place to the next.
We are running in the streets. I saw it with my own eyes.
I saw the tank and the bulldozer. It's on the street one.
This is what woman said, who would not give her name.
The Israeli military said in early January, it had quote,
dismantled Hamas framework in Jublia, okay?
So either they lied or they're incompetent,
although it expected to return the area
periodically to fight militants.
Now, that's not what this looks like.
This is another mass displacement and mass bombing campaign.
So my point is, they didn't dismantle anything.
I don't even think they're trying to do that at this point.
It's just about destroying the area.
And honestly, I think really on top of all of it,
they're just incompetent.
They really have shown themselves
to have no control over their individual actions.
People are out there taking TikTok videos of, you know,
the worst possible things
and they're all high fiving and praising it.
And then you're the same things are coming out of this
childlike the actions of the people in their government
because that's what they're doing.
That's who they are. And it's not
every Israeli or every Jew.
It is the Zionist controlling structure that is allowed
that like worst possible act
traits of humanity, the lowest common denominator praising
murder, rape, and pillage.
Now I wanna make sure we don't forget, okay,
this is important because it's already being spun back up.
Like there's somehow, you know,
just the ceasefire conversations are back in, okay,
Hamas agreed to the ceasefire.
Israel offered, even Blinken himself on the record said,
Hamas better accept it
because you know, basically saying Israel's giving him such
a great deal, they go, I'll take it.
Most likely calling their bluff, Israel screamed re,
you know, what's the best word for it?
Like they're pretending like they're involved
and they just like, they act like they weren't even there.
What do you mean deal? You're a liar.
And it's like, it was so embarrassing everybody else
involved, including the US
before they said that were clear about
that this was about Hamas is the only one.
Do they accept this? And then Israel acts like nothing
happened and we weren't involved in the US reels, back
backpedals and acts like we didn't see.
You can compare their statements from one day to the next.
It's shockingly embarrassing.
They, they know, we know
they're lying and they just don't care.
Israel then attacks Roth in response
and we just move forward like this didn't happen.
And the same old Zionist screamers are out there saying,
that's up to Hamas and they better give us our people back.
Return the hostages.
Even though you would've gotten 'em all back had you
accepted the deal or allowed them
to accept the deal they wanted to.
Now even the parents of over 900 Israeli soldiers
it's from today, are urging the IDF to call off
what they're doing in Rafa.
So now you've got thousands of families,
or rather thousands of parents
or almost a thousand to be exactly accurate.
But in the case of everybody else is why I said that.
So you have almost a thousand Israeli soldiers parents
of them urging them to call this off.
You've got thousands of Israelis, both family members
as well as protestors just out there screaming for them
as 9 7 2 magazine has made abundantly clear
to take the deal.
Remember what they just said after this last one we just
showed you after they refused
to accept the one they offered Hamas.
They said, if you don't let them take the
deal, Israel will burn.
These are protestors,
Israeli Jews on the ground screening for them to take the deal.
It's never been more obvious.
It's very clear what's happening.
And Nora ear Kat points out
that the Biden administration's in lockstep
with Israel's final plan
or final solution, if you will, for Palestinians and Gaza.
Its attempts at speaking legally and acting lethally
or only surpassed by cruel
and cruel repulsiveness by the mainstream media
that parrots it without critique.
Point being that they're acting like they're the responsible
one, trying to find a solution while they're giving them all
the weapons, supporting everything they do in reality
and not stopping it, which they can.
That that's my point about the worst of the worst, right?
You are the, that you are pretending
to be the good guy while you facilitate genocide.
That's pretty damn disgusting. Here's what she references.
Doctors without Borders who have yet to see them call Hamas,
but I'm sure they will or have report on
or respond to Biden's report saying the
administration's analysis of Israel's war.
And Gaza has not proceeded as good faith effort
to hold, uphold the law.
They don't care about the law.
But the point is, the state department's report concluded,
which I don't know if you saw,
which I don't know why we need them to say the thing
that's self-evident, but that it's quote, reasonable
to assess, not assume to assess
that Israel has violated international humanitarian law.
Now, make sense of that for me, it goes on to say though,
there is not enough information available
to verify if any US weapons were used in specific intimate.
I mean this, I mean, okay, what,
let's just say tomorrow they prove they did use us weapons,
although there's not enough information
to make sure it was used in that certain timeframe
that we need to pretend it's necessary
to make sure this claim, it's always one more thing.
It's so dumb to make.
They're literally telling you they've broken the law.
You know, the thing that they just screamed we're lying
about for seven months now.
They'll let us know. It's reasonable to assess.
We don't need you to say
that Your eyes can prove that for you.
They're murdering people in front of you.
They're chi, they're they're bombing children
with disregard for anything that matters.
And we're gonna let the state department say it's reasonable
to assess that they're killing children,
but they didn't use our weapons.
So here's more weapons shipments.
That's what they're saying. That's their point.
This is not a good faith effort to uphold the law.
You guys are terrorists that are allowing terrorism
with your, with our tax dollars.
It's overwhelmingly obvious at this point.
They've lost control of this.
Now you wanna see some examples of that?
Here's some of the worst that I've seen in regard to first
the blatant disregard.
They know they're posting this.
They know we're watching and they're doing things like this.
He says, we are in the university.
Here's him filming himself, walking
around a destroyed building.
We are in a university in Gaza.
He says, I think they're closed. How beautiful.
That alone should it, it's disgusting.
They know what they're doing. He goes another angle
of this ruin of the ruins.
We're starting a new semester. It'll start never.
They're making fun of children that can't go to school
because of what they did here.
Not because Hamas, but because they hate these people.
It says Israeli Master Sergeant Udi,
Ben Torah from the now blown up University.
Okay? The point being, if they went in there
and walked around and then blew up the building,
that is an egregious war crime as Scott Riter
and plenty of others have made very clear, they proved
that they were in there, which means they could have
personally, they're the
idea they had to blow up the building.
'cause the moss and human shield is clearly not the case.
If they're walking around, lay explosives down
and then control demolition.
That's what they're doing everywhere.
They're posting their own videos of it.
He says it appears they also use the university
as a military base for storing ammunition.
They keep, this is what they do with all of them, whether
or not they're gonna blow it up.
Human shields, let's say every accusation, it seems
to be an A, a, a, A.
What's the, what's the phrasing again?
Now every accusation is a admission.
This is now the intent to genocide section. He says.
So, uh, so scum, was it worth it? You invaded.
There are apocalyptic scenes and Gaza,
and this is just the beginning, that's what he's saying.
Ghost houses ruins craters.
And this really is just the beginning.
Like they're flaunting this, praising this,
not going after Hamas, but destroying everything.
Palestine because revenge, I mean,
how many IDF members on the record, whether anonymous
or not speaking with corporate media,
are admitting this to us.
I played you two of them saying we we're destroying things.
9 7 2 magazine said the same.
We're destroying buildings just to destroy
buildings over and over.
You're telling me the US
government can't piece this together.
They know what they're, they're ignoring it.
And it says, we will change your name to new tillage
because there is no land
that we haven't plowed turned or will turn.
Again, this is ethnic cleansing, mass displacement.
On the record, it says, you were mere mortals killable,
and you were mor mere mortals.
In these moments and beyond,
we will not stop tearing you apart.
Again, this is Israeli master Sergeant Udi Ben Torah.
Hopefully ICC is paying attention. The ICJ take a note.
These are genocidal actions being openly discussed.
These are war crimes being openly acknowledged.
Here's another one, Israeli soldiers from this
and this all con uh, you and Tara pointing this out.
Here's another building being blown up.
So what you're seeing here is a drone, again, proving to you
that there's no Hamas presence flying around.
It's already a building. They've blown up
and shot at Israeli soldiers from the 66th battalion,
filled a mosque with a drone observing
that it's completely empty with nothing in it,
having already been destroyed,
and then proceed to blow it up.
This is what we're dealing with guys, and they film it
and post it on TikTok and Instagram and everything else.
It's obvious criminal activity.
Israeli may, a mayor, Jan Titon from the 14th,
uh, brigade, excuse me,
Pande detailed war diary describing his
period of fighting in Gaza.
He said, uh, Yunis read the whole thing.
He read the whole diary and found something interesting.
Now it's a small thing in, in comparison to
what we're dealing with, but on looks like December 21st,
he describes searching in a home
and finding nothing to then admit that he burned it down.
Anyway, to think this is a unique thing
or an anomaly is to lie to yourself.
This is being institutional.
This is being put forward by the leaders, the rulers,
people with power.
I I don't know how we can argue otherwise.
Example after example, no investigations,
Matt Miller pretending like we're gonna look into it.
God, what a terrible person.
And this is absolutely deranged,
but also indicates protocol of burning houses.
Exactly the point. He clearly says, house searches
with no findings in preparing the houses
to be burned one after another.
Guys, it's all, it's all very self-evident.
But apparently by pointing out these self-evident statements
made by Israeli entities, I hate Jewish people.
Suddenly by pointing out facts,
that's the logical
reality we're in for some of these people.
It's as if weapons are discovered, they're confiscated,
not used to burn entire neighborhoods or buildings.
It also's important to note that most homes
and Gaza are individual homes, houses,
not apartment complexes.
Here's another one member of Knesset
and ue, KU official Tali Gottlieb, one
of the worst people in this conversation
with genocidal statements.
Again, it's what she says, quote,
attack mercilessly from the air.
We're we're talking about a whole area full
of innocent civilians attack Rafa
as we attacked in the Northern Strip.
You know, Rafa with a 1.5 million innocent people
who are already suffering and starving, dying
of thirst right now, Rafa citizens received an evacuation
notice, so it's okay to just bomb where they are.
If they left them, if they're still
there, that's their fault.
Whoever didn't evacuate will bear the consequences.
I just don't know what kind of moral human being reads that
and pretends like, yes, that makes sense.
So let's just make this clear.
So you're saying if they chose not to evacuate,
even though you've already bombed in places
where you've bo put,
where you've claimed they were gonna be safe or bombed
before they were able to evacuate
or bombed without evacuation notices
or any number of overlaps,
or even the cases where they've been shown that these vacu,
I mean there's still so many reasons why they
don't know whether this should even move.
And you're saying because you dropped leaflets.
If they, if they don't move,
it's okay to murder all of them.
How are we not recognizing this
as an open genocidal statement by a, like a, a psychopath?
I mean beyond sociopath like you are
openly going, it's their fault.
They didn't move from their territory
that we forced them out of.
So murder all of the children, 600,000 children are there.
This is what she's saying. Here's the full translation.
It says, God, why not attack from the air?
How many times do I have
to ask this Rafa citizens receive an evacuation notice?
So she's right now she's saying bomb. Everybody there.
That's what she's actually saying.
Whoever didn't evacuate will bear the consequences
of Palestinian, Hamas
and Islamic terrorists to attack mercilessly from the air.
How is that Hamas terrorist?
What she's trying to say is us bombing them
because they're there Is Hamas' fault typical?
That's what we keep hearing online, which is lunacy not,
that's not even to make it sound like
they're being forced to stay there.
It's just like it's their fault because Hamas exists
even though we funded them.
That's the truth. Talking about Israel,
only thus will we bring the enemy to surrender.
Even though the whole illusion
that Rafa's the last point has already been admitted even
by the IDF, they're currently bombing in the north.
Either she's too stupid to know that
or she's too dishonest to say it, to attack Rafa
as we attack the Northern strip,
may God avenge the blood of our heroic soldiers.
How beautiful it is for a soul to register
that I am mistaken, and
that our soldiers fell in the Z tone neighborhood.
Unlike the responder in intentionally not specifically
addressing, but rather the entire office system
to attack mercifully from the air instead
of turning an eye to the Hague court.
Turn an eye to the people of Israel, right?
Disregard international law. Do what I want.
These people are lunatics.
And here's the one we already showed you.
Just if, if you needed a better example.
I don't know if one exists. This is the world, uh,
Shimon Boker, vice Chairman of the world, la co,
the international arm of Israel Netanyahu's party.
He says, I think we should have gone to Rafa yesterday.
This was on the sixth saying about the fifth.
There are no uninvolved civilians there.
He says, you have to go in and kill and kill and kill.
We have to kill them before they kill us.
This is what we're dealing with.
You think your government doesn't
know this is how they think.
You think that people like they,
they haven't heard people like Wilkerson
who openly tells you he's worked with them long enough
to know that they lie about everything.
You don't think that Matt Miller's aware of this statement.
The only way to make sense of that is to know either
that they see it and don't care or that they think the same.
I just don't know how else to think about it.
Now, here is Nick Maynard speaking out on,
I think it was the 12th or it was posted on the 13th,
but a recent comment from Nick Maynard
as he's now back from Rafa.
Thank God
- I'm a surgeon.
I had two young female patients, Talla, who was 16, Lama
who was 18, both of whom had survivable injuries, both
of whom died last week as a direct result of malnutrition.
I've just returned from Gaza for my,
my second trip there since October the seventh.
I came outta Rafa, one
of the last people to leave on Monday.
What I saw over the last two weeks, the first thing I'd like
to highlight really is the direct
targeting of healthcare workers.
We know about this. We know that the hundreds
that have been killed
and also hundreds that have been abducted,
I met two young healthcare workers who I knew
and spent a considerable time with them last week.
One young doctor, one young nurse, both
of whom had been abducted, one of them kept in captivity
for 45 days, the other one for 60 days,
giving me very graphic
and stark descriptions of their daily torture at the hands
of the Israeli defense force.
And we of course we know there are many,
many other examples like this,
but hearing it from those individuals themselves was
extremely harrowing.
And I think, uh, there will be many other stories like that.
Over Christmas New Year,
I spent the whole two weeks operating all the time on major
explosive injuries to the abdomen and to the chest.
And it was really nonstop.
But the very strong narrative
of the patients I was treating over the last two weeks were
those with terrible infective complications
as a direct result of malnutrition.
And this was very stark indeed.
And I operated on many patients in the last two weeks
who had awful complications from their abdominal surgery
related to inadequate nutrition
and particularly those with abdominal wool breaking down.
So literally their intestines end up hanging outside
and the intestinal repairs that have been carried out
to deal with the damage to the bowels leaking.
So their bowel contents leaking out from different parts
of the abdomen, covering their bodies, covering their beds,
the lack of resources to deal with these inadequate numbers
of colostomy bags, wound management devices
and nutritional support.
And they get this vicious cycle of malnutrition, infection,
wounds breaking down more infection, more malnutrition.
So devastating.
And we will see far more of that over coming months.
- I just dunno, anybody could pretend like that's okay.
Like at the same point I make about all of it.
There's just nothing that makes this, okay.
No matter what narrative you throw over top October 7th,
all you know, they wanna kill all the jail no matter what.
Even if everything Israel's ever said about this is true,
and it's very clearly not, is that do, do you still
that you go, oh, okay.
That's why that many children make sense.
That's why children with their bowels hanging out
because they, I mean, think about how overwhelming that is.
And and, and again, this is what he said
before this, this is about pha. This is from months ago.
- Every single part of the hospital has been destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been destroyed.
When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were 107 patients sitting on the hospital,
60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures,
surgeons I know have been executed, um,
in the last 48 hours.
There, um, bodies have been discovered, uh, in the last 12
to 24 hours with who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back.
Uh, uh, uh, and so there is no doubt at all that,
that multiple healthcare workers have been executed there
in the last few days.
Ex you believe executed by whom?
Doctor by the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute
surgeons and medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October the seventh.
Over 450 healthcare workers have been killed.
Friends of mine that I've worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well
and nothing has been heard of them since.
So there is no doubt in my mind
and I've, IIII can bear witness from this,
from my time at Axa Hospital
and from talking to people
that there's been direct targeting of the healthcare
system in Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals
and multiple killings of healthcare workers.
Any death is tragic. But this is not,
and I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be upset
by this expression, colo, collateral damage.
This is specifically targeted.
You are saying medical professionals by the IDF
to be taken off and executed is your belief.
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that leads you,
would lead you to believe that there had been terrorists
who were hiding in the hospital without exception?
Every single one has responded
to say they have never witnessed any Hamas militant in the
hospitals they have worked in.
- Now, important to remember that he went back, like think
of the courage that takes to go back into that situation.
And by the way, he was in Rafa a as this was bombing.
I mean, he, he, as I understand it,
he was very close to being killed.
At least. At least that's the reporting.
And it's hard to know, know, I didn't see that from him.
But nonetheless, now he's reporting about what he saw.
I mean, how many examples like this do we truly need?
Uh, I mean, look, the very least I anybody's capable
of lying or having a reason to mislead anybody,
but do we have any reason to think that,
is there any example that shows he might have a reason to?
I mean, it's, it's willful disregard. He must be Hamas.
He must have another reason.
Well, that's assuming into which is the whole point of
what Zionist everywhere online seemed to be doing.
Assuming into whatever works for your narrative with nothing
to back it up, disregarding facts along with anything else
that show you that you might be wrong.
That's not just this conversation,
but it's very, very clear right now.
And here's another one of these examples.
The, the conversation we keep having about human shields.
I, I just don't know how I can make this any more clear.
This is a sad video, very sad video of a child that, well,
it's actually a very positive reality
that child made it out of the rubble.
But the fact is, the child lost all of their family.
They bombed this house.
The rubble fell on the family, killed everybody,
but the child was able to be saved.
My point is, I guess this must be one of those,
so-called human shields, we hear so much about odd
how all we ever seem to see
after the fact are the supposed shields
and never any Hamas members behind them.
In other words, they're just bombing and killing children.
I keep making this point after all this time, seven months
of the excuse for every single one
of them being human shields.
Human shields. Where is at least one, one provable example
of not just a guy you claim is shooting from an area
that looks like a hospital that layers is debunked
by the corporate media, which is what's happened.
Turns out he wasn't on the hospital grounds.
In any case, the point is of an actual human shield,
like the four or five examples we've seen just since
October 7th of Israel doing that with Palestinians,
I've shown you, I'll show you one in a second.
We don't have those. And the argument is, okay,
so they bombed this building, right?
So the only way
that could make sense is if there was human
shields and they had to do it right?
Hands tied. Jubilee refugee camp.
Well, okay then when you look,
shouldn't there be dead Hamas members too?
We never ever see that.
All we end up seeing is the shield with no Hamas behind it.
Obviously that's not what's happening guys.
Here's a sad video of a child.
Well, again, thank God the child made it,
but a sad video nonetheless.
Oh, I don't think I, I think it's just right here. Hold
on.
I did just, uh, let me grab it real quick just
because I think it's important.
So what we're gonna show you, as you can see in the kind
of running clip of the below, if this will ever download,
is one the work it takes.
I mean also to see that this guy with, you know,
his gloves just torn to shreds bare
with his bare hands digging out this child that you know,
and on top of that, if he
wasn't there, this child would be dead.
And again, bare hands,
they don't have the equipment that's needed.
And if this child was below anything heavy enough,
they would've been right there
and unable to even save the child.
That's the reality that these rescue workers
are going through every single day.
- Mama,
mama, mama.
Oh my god,
mommy, I'm up here.
- That's the face of Zionism right there.
2013 Palestinian children tortured, used
as shields by Israel per the United Nations.
Reuters, Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy,
a 9-year-old as human shield, avoid jail defense
for children, international
and international human rights group,
Israel forces use five Palestinian
children as human shields.
That's 20 23, 2. This is from 2017.
Generally, human shields, since the beginning
of the occupation in 1967,
Israeli security forces have repeatedly
used Palestinians in the West Bank
and the Gaza Strip, its human shields.
Israeli soldiers routinely use Palestinian civilians
as human shields by forcing them
to carry out life-threatening tasks.
It was also following a high court petition against this
practice, which was filed by human rights organizations
around the world in May, 2002,
that the IDF issued a general order prohibiting the use
of Palestinians as a means of human shield against gunfire
or attacks by the Palestinian side.
But then it goes on to say, following the order, the use
of human shields dropped sharply.
However, the arms
of the army did not construe as a human shield.
The use of Palestinians provided.
They consented, the army continued the widespread use
of this practice, which they referred to
as the neighbor procedure.
Following another petition filed
by human rights organizations, the high court
of justice ruled that this practice too
violated international humanitarian law
and that this thus was illegal.
And guess what they've never stopped doing here is the
Institute for Middle East,
understanding the neighbor procedure.
Israel's use of Palestinian human shields from 2012,
human rights watch during military operations.
Israeli shoulders routinely coerced Palestinian civilians,
including children to perform life.
Endangering acts that assisted military operations,
the practice known as the neighbor procedure.
Now see this,
I think it's worth saying that it's very difficult.
It's very easy to see
how somebody can be pushed into radical
action in this position.
I mean, just having to, watching this stuff
and having to see the reality, the byproduct, that alone,
I have to check myself all the time to not become,
to not allow myself to become more subjective.
Because it's just hard not
to become emotional with something like this.
And I think then even from even falling into it further
and asking yourself, how do people exist
that can pretend like this is okay
or that this is o it's all it's Hamas' fault.
Even that kind of blithe response pr Hamas probably used him
as a, she had just, it makes me want to, it makes me want
to be the kind of person that I'm not.
It's very hard. This is the kind of thing
that we need to fight to stop.
And I don't mean just Zionism
or Israel, just anybody out there allowing this kind
of thing to continue under the guise that it's one side
or the other, or it's one political,
it's one religion, it's one group.
Everybody trying to create the justification to take,
to do the kind of things that governments do all the time.
And you've got people, average people, Americans, uh,
Israelis who are being driven to, to rationalize the worst
of human nature right now.
Now I'm, I feel like I wanna, there's a,
we've talked in the past about like a deeper conversation
of like the Yuga cycles
and like this conversation of where we are in the world.
That's worth having a conversation about at some point,
about how close we are to shifting into a new,
and whether you believe this stuff
or not, I find it hard not to see how dark,
at least some elements of, of hue of the world have gotten
in a rapid way.
I just don't understand.
What I sit here is Israel uses human shield
as an open secret that has been called out
by every major human rights group, the United Nations,
even Israeli officials, even as a name.
It's called the Neighbor Procedure.
The videos or the, the, uh,
images just from October 7th forward are very clear.
But things like this are public.
Im public, publicly available, just unaccountability
using a belt or something.
Just literally tying this kid to the front
of your vehicle while you go in, which is
what the story was, and engage with people with guns.
It's that obvious. And it's not
to say that Hamas isn't capable.
I I, I find it hard to believe it's not.
I guarantee there's at least an example.
But my point is, e even though I argue
that you still don't have a single example in seven months,
even though you've shown us tens of thousands
of supposed shields kind of find that hard to believe.
Howard Beckert points out the bombing going into the 13th
has continued in Rafa and elsewhere, internet
and electricity cuts across Gaza last night.
Now realize guys we're talking about right here, 12 13th,
how about Mother's Day, a bombing on Mother's Day?
Not that they have any reverence for anything it seems,
but bombing relentless, bombing continued all over the strip
on Mother's Day, Gazen, mothers grieve
for children lost to the war.
No Mother's Day for Gazen. Moms mourning their children.
Rami Abdul points out,
and this sees the chairman of imed, human rights group,
victims of the Israeli Army massacre against just one
family in one camp.
And this was on the 10th of May.
There's seven different people in one family
that were killed in one bombing, in one location.
I mean, this is constant.
And there's so many people in power like your Lindsey
Grahams and Tom Cottons.
It's just, just in the United States that I, I would,
would be willing to bet you anything know this
and just don't care.
In fact, see a political benefit in light siding
with the group that's giving them lots of money,
but also with lots of other powerful things
and ignoring the things that they swear up and down.
Their entire identity is based on human rights
and rules based orders and constitutional rights.
None of that matters to them
as they currently take those things
or do not honor your rights in regard to Americans right now
as they're trying to attack people in college protests
and elsewhere for having the wrong opinions.
But they swear they care about your rights
unless you say this, unless you look like that.
This person in, in back
and forth with this in, with Dave Smith basically in back
and forth about what's going on,
like the, the horrors of Gaza.
This person says, like, I'll just read what he says here.
He says, this is just a lie to dismiss the reality
because it completely destroys your narrative
that everyone didn't prop amass,
which is what his argument was.
But Israel sure did.
And it wasn't out of altruism,
just an attempt to force things.
You know, basically just, I,
I guess it wasn't even that relevant.
The point is they're arguing about Gaza and Hamas
and oh, the overarching point was about the, the
very provable statement
that Netanyahu made in 2019 about funding Hamas.
It's, it's very self-evidently clear.
And the argument is everybody propped up Hamas,
which is a stupidly false statement,
but this person responds to that for some reason
and says, I can't go to class
because pro Hamas is blocking me
threatening death to America.
Which is not true. In fact, not even remotely,
they're not pro Hamas.
They're not threatening death to America. These people are
childishly ridiculous.
Now, I I'm sure you could point out somebody
and then even then we should make sure we don't realize
those, or we should research to find out whether
that's not a Zionist pretending because I say that
because we've had about seven
or eight examples of that being provably happening.
Get talk right now. Provably have to have happened.
And this has been shown by people in the police department,
investigators in Congress, openly going, that didn't happen.
There's no evidence for that.
We'll get to a point about that.
The end and the stabbing of the eye we've talked about
that went around like wildfire.
Multiple people in US Congress went so far as to say
that multiple people had been stabbed
with sharpened Palestinian flags in the eye.
None of that happened. It all went down to
that one girl lying about being stabbed in the eye
and then politicians just not giving it anything.
Not caring, just lying anyway.
Or not even caring to check,
but they say this lie, I can't go to class
because they threatened me.
Now, let's just first take a
conversation, pretend that it's real.
Here's what Dave says. I was just listening to an interview
with a doctor who returned from
Gaza one we just played for you.
He was explaining that due to the shortage of anesthesia,
he had to perform amputations on
children with zero anesthesia.
Now, I realize that you are the real victim here.
Well said Dave. And I'm not gonna play this for you.
I'm gonna include it if you
wanna look through the links and find it.
But I gotta say, this is not something
that I would ever wanna share on the show,
but I thought it was important that should, you need
to see it, that you actually see it, okay,
this child arrived in an emergency room
as a result of a bombing.
Or by the way, you could argue that it's
because of what he was just describing.
'cause it's similar, his intestines were
hanging outside of his body.
We're talking about an infant.
This is what's happening on the ground.
How, I don't know how many things you could dismiss away
as opposed to human shields without proving it while we're
watching children suffer in unimaginable ways.
It's there if you wanna watch it.
I don't want you guys to see it. There's children watching.
It's there. If you wanna look, it's, it's probably one
of the hardest things I've ever had to look at.
Now on Mother's Day, while they're bombing children,
having their intestines hang out,
people getting their faces blown off.
You know, the normal day in Gaza, right?
Now, here's what some
of these Zionist propagandas put out on Mother's Day.
This is what Mother's Day in Israel looks like
because Israeli civilians are constantly
under terror attack.
That's what she wrote while they were, as she wrote that,
killing children in Gaza.
And here's the video she shared.
Okay, first
and foremost, I don't, there's no sirens,
there's no rocket, there's nothing happening.
In fact, the child doesn't even look like she's scared.
The child looks like she's wondering what's going on.
In any case, let's just sake of conversation assume that
that was a scared mother,
because that's, that's certainly possible.
But the reality would be that's a mother who has been
so convinced that she should be scared about
seemingly nothing or the hype about something may be
happening or the threat of a siren
or a rocket that hit in a field
all the way on this side of town.
But you skinned your knee on the way to a shelter,
whatever there keeps pushing as
the biggest thing we should care about.
It's certainly possible that she's terrified
and that shouldn't be something we belittle or ignore
because that mom and her child might very well be terrified.
But we need to make sure we understand it's
because of Israel that they're terrified
in every way you can imagine.
But regardless of any of that, imagine posting that video
on Mother's Day while you're bombing children
in their mother's arms in Gaza.
And, and, and at the same time framing it as
civilians are constantly under attack.
That's not even remotely true.
You're not constantly under attack.
In fact, it's been shockingly rare since the first three
months that was just reported by a associated press.
My point is they don't care about facts at all.
They lie in any possible way to push the agenda,
which is why I would wonder whether this was
completely fabricated.
In any case, it doesn't change the fact
that you're ignoring the obvious reality
of what's going on in Gaza to push.
Look over here at a seemingly benign
event with there's no danger.
The cars are driving by back in the background.
There's, as this person writes, no sirens can be heard.
The car behind her is driving.
Normally she's laying in front
of a shelter rather than inside of it.
Feeble lie, keep trying.
You may get it right someday, maybe. I don't know.
In any case, it pains me
that people are not being called out
and they are in some cases for this kind
of despicable statement.
Like it's not about look at her,
it's about don't look over there.
That's what she's doing. Pretend that this in comparison,
completely benign event is more important
because it's in Israel.
That's what she's doing. Makes my skin crawl.
Speaking of skin crawling, here's Tom Cotton,
and we just talked about this story.
Apparently they claim a rocket hit a, a playground,
which I've seen very little coverage of by the way.
And even when I showed you it, it was a very weirdly, the,
the had this fake part where the guy laid down.
It was like this very, I said, this looks like a bee movie.
And all I saw was some piece
that looked like a piece of junk.
I saw a very small piece of grass that was disrupted.
I I never even looked back to it
because it seems so flimsily stupid to me.
But of course Tom Cotton picks it up
because that's anything that works for your agenda, Tom.
It says it's reprehensible
that Biden has more criticism for Israel.
You know, the one that's killed 50,000
people, 14,000 children.
And we'll get to those numbers in a second.
Let's just say it was a thousand children, a thousand people
we're supposed to be more outraged about a playground
disrupted with some dirt in the
street than a thousand children.
Somebody obviously has loyalties where they shouldn't be.
And he says then the terrorists
launching rockets of playgrounds.
Again, let's just say it even was a
rocket that did hit a playground.
Who launched it? Did you do an investigation?
Tom, do you know who it was? Was it Mossad?
Was it a Palestinian launch? Jihad, was it Hamas?
Was it some other government? Was it some other country?
I guess it doesn't matter because as long
as we can make it about our agenda, then we don't care.
Ask Matt Miller about anything else.
And we need 45 years to investigate.
But this already done rocket hit the field.
We know what it's we're. It's just self,
what's the word I was looking for?
Not self-serving. There was something else of, anyway,
it's obviously self-serving.
You're you taking advantage of this story?
But look at this video, you tell me
that this looks like a rocket hitting a,
this is, this is the playground.
Okay, this doesn't make sense to me.
Like, okay, this, this trash can seems
to be a little bit just beat up,
but it looks like it's got stuff on the,
this side of it looking at the screen.
So then like, just explain this scene
to me from a logical perspective.
Where did it hit? First of all?
I think it might have, there might be saying like right
here, but I don't see a crater or anything.
I see some dirt kicked into the road.
I see a tree broken right
there, which doesn't make sense to me.
Did you just break that tree in half?
I mean, I'm gonna be honest. Anyway, my point though is
that this, this, unless I get more evidence, this
to me seems like a complete fabrication.
I just, I don't, at the very least, it was nothing
of any notice, no notability.
It was just a, a small thing
that hit like bottom line is I said the first place a rocket
was fired and it hit this area.
There's two things to consider if that's the case.
One, they themselves make the claim constantly
that they're unguided rockets,
which is why they argue it's always a war crime.
So you can't pretend that they targeted this,
if you're gonna claim that, which they do
anyway 'cause that's how Zionism works.
But secondarily, they're literally
under constant bombardment.
You are bombing their children as I talk about this.
So it's kind of hard to make it seem like an out
of character re or a crime to fire a rocket in response.
A single rocket that caused barely a, that seemed
to have kicked up some fur, some dust.
I mean it's, that's what it seems like we're looking at.
Nobody was hurt, but Tom Cotton is more outraged
that Biden did not scream about this as opposed
to the ongoing genocide
that you're all pretending isn't happening.
These are supposedly people fighting for Americans,
and we're gonna get to the point about
how they're ignoring the 600
Americans that are trapping Gaza.
They don't care about that. Seemingly,
they only care about Zionism,
which becomes the bigger point.
Now, Pelham highlights
as Tom Cotton is screaming about some dirt in the street
here, two Palestinian children were burn alive while Israeli
settlers firebombed their house in Duma,
in occupied West Bank, not Gaza West Bank,
but Tom Cotton, who can, who couldn't care less about that.
He wants you to scream about some dirt in the street
because it's Israel here.
Rami points out that also in well Ramallah,
Israeli settlers set fire to olive trees,
agricultural crops in the village of all Moog.
Ha. Nobody cares about that though,
despite it being a ver an undeniable crime
that even the US government pretended they were gonna
sanction these groups, but they have never even pulled back.
It's gotten worse. They are raping and robbing and pillaging
and destabilizing and burning houses down burning crops.
Not a single thing I just said is unprovable.
It's on the record. They've called it out.
The Hart's paper has called all of those things out verbatim
as these settlers have been doing everything they can.
And don't forget, Israel gave them official status.
It just doesn't stop.
Now, in regard to all of these crimes and the ICC
and the ICJ in this conversation, here's
what Jake Sullivan had to say when asked
shockingly a good question by one of these,
those journalists about whether this is a genocide
and whether he can maintain
that it's not a genocide when every definition
of a genocide is met.
This is what cowardice looks like.
- You said at the start of this
that you don't believe what's happening in Gaza is genocide.
What criterion are you using?
- We're using the internationally accepted term
for genocide, which it includes a focus on intent.
And it's not just me standing here at this podium in the
context of this International Court of justice,
uh, case at the Higg.
The United States actually made a presentation backed up
by legal analysis, which I would invite you to read
because it lays out all of those criteria.
- Uh, Francesca Albanese, especially you,
repertoire on human rights
and Palestine presented one in March her,
she presented it in Geneva, the three criterions she used,
setting international law.
Three acts, Israel's intent to destroy national, ethnic,
racial or religious groups, serious bodily
or mental harm to a group inflicting on a group conditions
of life, calculate to bring physical destruction in whole
or in part within imposing measures intended
to prevent birth within the group process of erasure
of the native Palestinians.
So those three things are happening.
How can you say genocides not being committed,
- As I just told you.
I think the best way for me to answer
that question is actually to ask you
to look at the lay down that we gave, which
- That's an interesting answer.
He no way denied those things are met.
Those are the, that's,
that's directly from the un ur that's the reality.
They're all met. I mean it takes a special,
it's it's self-evident.
Nobody can pretend the
things she just said aren't happening.
They just have a different
narrative around why they're happening.
So all these says is read the thing we wrote
before the same as Matt Miller.
I'll wait to say it 'cause I think we're gonna play it.
Same as Matt Miller doing what he does in a second,
which is just, I have no further comment.
Move on. Because you know,
you can't say anything because it'll trap you.
- Are you saying this isn't happening?
- I'm, I'm sorry. I thought you asked me how I can say it.
I'm saying I'd like you
to look at the United States. I just did.
- I'm asking, are you saying this isn't happening? Okay.
- Do you mind if I finish answering
your question before you interrupt? I
- Challenge you to say, are you saying that she's a liar?
- The United States is laid down at the International Court
of Justice in writing in detail its position on this issue.
And I'd ask you to read it. Thank you. I have you
- Say that.
It doesn't line up with them with what she's
- Saying and he runs away.
Right. So your point is, obviously, if you're saying
that this is our position
and your position is it's not happening, you're not, you,
you, you're just, it's a way of not having
to say she's lying or I'm right and she's wrong.
And look at the thing we were put, if you read
what they wrote, it's obviously lacking in the first place.
But now that we're months along the way, there's a hell
of a lot more going on.
That's why he raced out of there.
It's obvious that they know they're trapped.
You have corporate media in a position where it's impossible
for them not to ask some of these questions.
That's how crazy this is.
That's how much they have lost control.
That's why you've got the partisan screamers at the top
of the paradigm, desperate to get people trapped in
that, to look at something else.
Isn't it interesting how the top of the left
and right oddly aren't pointing at the they want China,
Russia, whatever else.
They don't want you looking at the reality
of the situation right now coming up to the election.
Very few of them. And that's what I think is so funny.
I was looking at this earlier about somebody,
a right wing entity who was making a good point about APAC
and about some, you know, the, the, or I think,
or yeah, I believe it was APAC and,
and the point about how influence and so on
and calling this stuff out
and a lot of other right wing accounts below it,
even big ones going, yeah, good, call it out, whatever.
And then tagging 11 different people that are the top
of the right wing paradigm
that I'm thinking, he'll never talk about it.
He'll never talk about this. He's gonna ignore it.
And I was like, how did they not see that?
How do they not recognize they're calling to the people
who will never point this out?
Well, people that they'll dismiss as some kind of a lefty
or somebody like, you know, whatever,
whatever they wanna call people like us
who will happily listen to what they have to say.
Tucker, look over here.
just, they're not listening guys.
They don't want to, here is an important
discussion about the numbers.
Well, this has to do with the point about the ICJ
and everything else in regard to the amount of people.
Now this is a lie overall.
This is a clear, I mean, so the lie is, I mean, it is a lie,
but it's more about a deception.
Because what we're dealing with is a,
is a very carefully coordinated manipulation,
even including, I would argue elements of the un.
But the pr the, the bottom line is the numbers
that are being shown have always been, first
of all from the very beginning have been estimates
or, you know, bottom line being
that it's way more than what we're talking about.
Because, and this is even cited in the UN's numbers
to this very po moment.
Because there are people under the rubble
and they know that what happened is they've differentiated
now between identified bodies
and unidentified, not that we don't know if they exist.
So we have bodies, right?
So there's 30,000 bodies, then they're going,
well here's 10,000 that we don't know who they are.
We don't know what their name
is, we don't know where they're from.
That's unidentified.
Now Zionists have jumped on this to manipulate people
who are looking at it to act like, see, we knew it.
They're lying about the numbers.
They're not, or at the very least, it's the best estimate
that we have based on all the evidence, including
with the IDF and the intelligence of Israel also agrees to,
but my point is, let's just for first the first point.
Pretend like it is less, right?
So he says the UN has just halved
the estimate of women and children.
It's not what happened. And this still counts 16
to 17-year-old terrorists as children.
'cause this guy's a completely honest person, right?
16 to 17-year-old terrorists mean like the people
that you have in prisons in Israel for throwing rocks
or somebody who did nothing wrong.
And you've held without charge for 20 years.
Guys, they've, even the UN has admitted that's the majority
of what we're dealing with here in some way or another.
People that are in, uh,
I just forgot the term of it.
Uh, not indefinite administrative detention.
That is a huge portion of what we're dealing with.
Many of children not charged with a crime.
This honest person doesn't care about that.
The point is, let's just say they did have it, right?
What's your argument? Oh, okay, so it's only 7,000 children.
Oh, good, no problem.
Then I just don't even understand the kind of logic
or lack thereof we're dealing with here.
It, i, I said this from day one.
It's when, when it was a hundred children,
what do you think makes this omega makes this okay, now
that you're claiming, oh no, it's only 7,000 and not 15,000.
It's somehow a complete, we got you. It's nothing.
No big deal. I mean, I don't think you guys thought this
through, or at the very least you just don't
have any other route to take.
But here is what a soft MD points out. No, it did not.
It delineated between identified and unidentified bodies.
And you can look at their own documents yourselves.
I, I have the link in a second.
He says, 24,686 identified humans,
10,000 unidentified.
It's right there. And all they're doing is going,
they moved it down to 24 hoping that people are too
blindly following to look for themselves.
He says, note at the bottom, it says, quote,
not including more than 10,000 reported missing under the
rubble, meaning it's even more.
That's the main point.
Remember these names as always
guys, remember who these people are.
Remember that. They know that they're lying,
allowing children to be murdered while they do so.
And he says, and this is a soft pointing this out,
highlighting what the Israel Foreign Ministry account,
foreign Ministry account said, showing you
that fritz an institutional level of dishonesty.
It says, tag me every time you see one of these posts.
I'm community noting every single one.
And what's funny is that they are having
them removed as usual.
But the point is, the post is misrepresenting the graphic
and the UN reports have not changed.
The casualty numbers have been further delineated by the UN
as identified bodies and non-identified bodies.
Very simple. But here's the foreign ministry saying they've
reduced their reported number.
Interestingly, they did not release any press statements.
It should, I mean, again, it's just like the kind
of skin crawling, manipulation.
You know, you're murdering children
and you're willing to choose
and even lie at a point where, you know,
most people will see that you're lying.
I just don't know how. You don't see that as desperation,
knowing that we're gonna see through it, knowing
that at some level, a politician might be able, willing
to call it out for their own benefit.
Now that was the, this is
just another person pointing it out.
But here's my point about this though.
There's no community note. It got removed.
It was there, it's gone.
Now that's, that's not an accident, guys.
That's a Elon Zionist manipulation in my opinion.
It says community notes. This is a lie.
The second set of figures you present is
specifically identified bodies.
Same point. You know this, it's easy to verify.
And another ridiculous human being that's being kind.
Michael Rappaport. There is no genocide.
Throw away your signs. The UN is have the estimate.
Now again, I argue this is a person who is just too stupid
to know that he's wrong or doesn't care.
They're just gonna blindly follow whatever the narrative is
or grab whatever circulating concept makes
it look like he might be right.
'cause people like this, I guarantee you,
in the dark reaches of the night or are struggling with this
because they know you, we see them,
they know the world's beginning to recognize,
or at the very least, he may be finally beginning
to recognize that this isn't what he thought it was.
And you're trapped now, bud, too late.
You hitched yourself to this wagon.
You're not coming back from the Zionist train.
And it's at the worst time in the world to be a Zionist.
My point though is that this kind of thing is happening.
People get more aggressive.
You suck and lie, blah, just, it's just this blow brow,
lowest common denominator, crass, crude,
complete idiot, in my opinion.
But here is the interesting point about this.
Okay, let's just pretend again they're being honest.
Let's just pretend again that that is what happened.
The United Nations says whoopsie, it's only half. Again.
Doesn't change the fact that it's an
obvious war crime situation.
But then how do you explain this?
This is an Israeli mainstream platform saying the Army
checked and found that the reports of the Ministry of Health
and Gaza are reliable.
Okay? So the ar by the way, you know it's still accurate
because the numbers are still the same.
They're lying about what just happened.
But what's funny is, what does Michael
Rappaport think this is showing?
So you're, are you admitting the idea of lied to us?
Are you admitting that the Israeli government lied
for some reason about these numbers?
They'll never address that
because that makes them look stupid.
But here's the army saying reliable.
And then here's the intelligence of Israel saying
that they were accurate.
Same point. And 'cause that's the truth, guys.
And you can look back as far as you want.
They've actually admitted that more times than I can count.
But every time it seems like we rehash these new things
because people just follow the leader.
And then I'll get the last one.
This is, uh, tall Hagan, who just kind
of did a breakdown showing you the, the, the,
the official numbers and the links and so on.
You could check it all for yourself
simply saying the same thing.
It was simply a change in the way that they highlighted,
identified versus un unidentified.
But you'll see this guys, you'll probably see
that lie parative for the next 10 years.
That's how wild this is.
Like they still claim Assad carried out gas attacks,
even though you can prove with every possible way
that we were lied to about that.
It's just narrative, narrative, narrative control.
But on the good thing is Egypt now says it will formally
support South Africa's genocide case against Israel.
I think it has something to do with them blocking
off the Roth of crossing.
We'll show you next. But not just Egypt, the government
of Maldives has announced its formal participation
and the lawsuit filed by South Africa against the guys.
It's coming down. There's no way to get away from this.
This is shifting rapidly.
And even people that I argue would not have taken the side
of anybody but Israel, they see it too.
You have people sitting in their little strategic political
groups going, okay guys, Israel's failing.
They're losing. The world sees them.
We gotta start deciding what we're gonna do.
It doesn't mean they don't care about human rights,
just like they usually don't.
But I can promise you that these are opportunists people.
These governments, the moment they smell blood in the water,
recognize that Israel might not be able
to do the things it needs to do
to give them what they were supposed to get.
They will go, okay, now who do we side with?
Well, you're gonna side with the obvious momentum,
which is the people and the reality
that we see what's going on.
You're gonna stand up and go, I condemn Israel.
That moment will come and
you'll start seeing people do that.
Like, do you condemn Israel? Do you condemn ?
It'll be another political manipulation, just like always.
But in there somewhere will be the truth
that Israel's responsible for this genocide that we have
to make sure we recognize.
Now, let's talk about the United
Nations for a couple points.
I find this to be fascinating actually.
And what the, uh, was it, was it Malaysian?
Yeah, the Malaysian UN representative had to say was
powerful, but I don't know if you saw this.
It's this guy is so full of these flimsy gimmicks.
And what's so funny is that everybody in this room,
and by which is evidenced by the numerous votes they've had
where they vote and they all near unanimously vote on the
side of Palestinian self-determination
or, you know, just not genocide.
And then you get Israel and maybe Britain
and the United States who just keep vetoing and keep,
and yet this guy stands up there
and speaks at them like they're supposed to listen to him.
Like speaks at down at them like they're all bad people
for not blindly supporting their genocide
and just scaring them with attack.
I mean, it's, it's embarrassing.
He must feel uncomfortable about it or he doesn't care.
I mean, the guy doesn't seem like he's that bright.
He's a very, very, you know,
Neanderthal type person in my opinion.
But he says Israel's ambassador to the United Nations,
Gilead Iden took the group's charter, the UN charter, which
by the way, I'm not a supporter of the United Nations.
I I mean in, in the most senses,
I think it's a problematic entity.
But I recognize how the mechanisms which are in place are
still used at this point.
Nonetheless, he puts the charter on a mini shredder.
So if that's something that you have reverence for,
which many of the people in the body do,
what do you think you're doing that,
what do you think you're gonna accomplish with that?
And he said the General Assembly has done, he said, this is,
he said to express
what he said the general assembly has done to it
by voting in favor of the Palestine state.
You know, the thing they otherwise
pretended they always wanted.
It's kind of hard not to check out
that obvious contradiction.
So you've been stressing
that it's only Palestine that's never allowed it.
That's obviously not true.
And they've been making that shockingly clear today.
But watch what he does. Watch
what he says. Listen to what he says.
- , so many of you are Jew hating.
You don't really care that the Palestinians are
not peace loving.
- I mean, think about just right there.
This isn't a classroom full of junior high students.
You're speaking to powerful entities from around the world,
by the way, many of which who are far, I mean, uh,
let's leave it with the same point.
These are people that do not respect this person.
Or at the very least,
see right through what they're lying about.
They voted for it many times.
And all they can do is go, you hate Jews.
I mean, I'm, I bet you you can
hear them snickering back there.
I I mean, whether you think some of them do or not.
The argument that every single person in this body
of the United Nations is either on your side or hates Jews.
Like we can't see through that clear pro.
I mean, this is bottom of the barrel.
It's lazy, illogical,
and clearly not what's happening.
And at one point in time,
people were just scared they didn't do
anything 'cause they were powerful.
But it's laughable. It has no power anymore.
Not over individuals.
It only has power still in mainstream entity groups
that can still fire you
or to act like calling you
that is somehow gonna change who you are.
It's just lost its power. Why?
Because they use it only it seems when you're
criticizing the crimes of Israel.
I'll make a point about this in a minute.
They don't even seem to go after actionable antisemites.
They clearly don't even care about that. Why?
Because Zionism is truly antisemitism.
But that's why, that's how he starts. You hate Jews.
Big surprise.
- Despite your obligation to the UN charter,
you are here today to expose
what the charter truly means to you.
- What do you mean? What, what, what,
why obligation in quote, I mean this, I'll, I'll leave it
for the Malaysian point, but I'm,
he's undermining everything that many
of these people hold sacred, your obligation as if
that has no meaning and no power.
It's like who cares about the
un is what he's basically saying.
They do clearly
- Expose what the charter truly means to you when it comes
to the lives of Israelis and Jews.
The UN charter means nothing to you, nada capu
by ignoring the charter
and granting the Palestinians the privileges
of a member state, you are proving
that morality is just a slogan for you.
While politics and interest prevail,
- It, it's, I just, I see a child stomping.
That's what I see. It's childish and it's small.
And what you're doing is pretending
that you're the most moral entity in the room.
Like you somehow have something over everybody else.
And I don't mean blackmail, I mean
that you're somehow morally superior.
It's just shockingly false.
And everybody in that room knows it.
You guys, you're not only just committing
genocide, we know what you really are.
We know what you've been doing for 75 years.
Everybody in that room knows that.
And to act like this is somehow their responsibility
- To you while politics and interest prevail to you.
The UN charter is just a meaningless document.
- What, you know, what he's trying to do.
It's like he's trying to carry out some like very clumsy
version of reverse psychology, right?
You don't even care about the UN hopes they're gonna
go, yeah, I do.
I'll vote for you. I really do. I promise.
I mean, I mean, I'm obviously making it sound really,
really childish, but is it's what it is.
It's a, it's a lowbrow not very intelligent ploy
to trick them, I guess, into going, I actually do care.
They all do. They, I mean, like,
I'm not saying this in the sense that it's the the
morally correct or that they all care about the right thing,
but I think it's very clear that they care, at least insofar
as they have power in this body about the charter
and about being in this.
And all they can do is act like they're
the ones that don't care.
While you then go on to shed shred the charter .
It's like, it's like, do they even think this stuff through?
Or are they just really this bad at this?
- And the vote today will prove that
you know what you're doing today.
Today you are gutting, gutting the charter,
and you are doing it in the wake of the most brutal massacre
of my people since the Holocaust.
- And remember he does, he shreds it right now.
There hasn't been a vote yet.
So he is saying, if you do that, you will do this.
And then he shreds it before the vote. an idiot
- On the ashes of the October 7th massacre. Oh
- Yeah.
And don't forget, which was at least, I mean, as, as, uh,
Zachary Foster has pointed out
a huge portion of which were not Jewish.
As he points out, there's Bedwin villages
that were attacked on October 7th.
Weird how they only talk
about the Jewish people that are attacked.
I've made that many times that point many times.
But Zachary's the one that gave me more statistics
to back up the reality that a huge portion
of them were not even Jewish.
So regardless of whether it was half
or all the, the point is there were other people
than Jews that were killed.
And yet you only ever hear about the Jews
that were killed on October 7th.
You just can't miss what
that shows you do their other lives.
Not matter
- Why this day will go down in that's,
- That's just right there.
Just, I mean, again, it's,
I I I haven't sorry to dwell on it.
I'm not just saying this to be dero,
dismissive or derogatory.
It's, it's very outwardly childish childlike.
Watch what he does right here on
- The ashes of the October 7th massacre, why
this day will go down in infamy so
that you can see exactly
what you are inflicting upon the UN charter with this
destructive vote.
- God. I mean, this is as stupid as Biden Netanyahu
with this big bomb graph or,
or the wall full
of CDs like they think this has meaning by this display.
It gets, it gets you laughed at. That's what it does.
- You are shredding the UN charter
- With your own hand.
You are right now. And, and you know what's funny about it?
It's not even the UN charter. It's a piece of paper
that says you un charter .
It's just so stupid.
- Yes, yes. That's what you're doing.
Shredding the UN charter.
- You could have just said that.
- Shame on you. - Wow. Wow. Shame.
They haven't even voted yet.
My point is that this is an unjustified superiority.
You don't have any right to stand there
and act like you're mor morally superior than anybody.
Shame on you. I mean, think about standing there.
Think about the goal it takes
to stand there while you're lying about everything,
your origins, what you're currently doing, what you believe,
and going shame on all of you
for not blindly following our genocide.
I just think it's shocking.
Now, here's what the Malaysian, uh,
UN representative had to say.
Completely dismantles this guy.
- Palestine has beyond doubt proven itself worthy
of membership of this organization.
In contrast, Israel continues to bring
- Actually really quickly before we, I I, I got,
maybe I should have showed this first.
I, I feel like you guys are following,
but not everybody watches every show.
Just so you realize on the 10th we covered this,
the UN assembly approved a resolution granting Palestine new
rights very, very close to full rights.
But it takes the security council vote
to give them full membership.
So as, as Mr. Mr.
Child over there stomps his feet
and says, you're just doing whatever the point is, even
that wouldn't have translated
to full rights without a security council vote.
But it's too bad because they voted in general anyway.
So they essentially have membership with this approval
and it gives them, I forget the exact metrics off the top
of my head, but I know they were
involved in certain parts of this.
They don't have a full vote, but they have a voice.
That's too, it's too late now.
So my, that's important to recognize.
So that was him screaming and stomping his feet
before they voted for this.
They voted anyway showing you they don't care about his
childish display showing you they're probably snickering
about how dumb that was behind his back.
And now here is what the Malaysian, uh, uh, representative
to the UN said after that
- International membership of this organization in
Palestine has beyond doubt proven itself worthy
of membership of this organization.
In contrast, Israel continues to bridge international law,
defy UN resolutions as well as vilify
and malign the United Nations
and its officials Israel's action.
- Yeah. Murdering of many of them, right?
I mean, let's not ignore how many UN
officials have been murdered.
Not just un, not just Oxfam,
not just different tangential elements of the un,
but now even an international staff member that was not part
of UN r we'll get to that which
- Each passing day inevitably raise our doubts if it
actually believes in the UN system
and values this membership.
It doesn't in this organization
- That should be self-Evidently clear Israel doesn't give
a, I mean Israel tax.
If the un, if Israel is literally saying the UN is Hamas
and is standing up there going shame on all of you
and shredding the charter pretty clear.
They don't give a damn about the UN charter.
I mean, that's obvious. And they disregard, what is it?
Hundreds of UN resolutions now.
I mean, they've ignored the ceasefire resolutions.
They've ignored everything. They don't care.
The US is no different guys.
The US government is no different.
- The offensive gimmick
of shredding the UN charter we witnessed in this chamber
last Friday is just another example
of Israel's utter disrespect of the United Nations.
The carnage in Gaza must stop the international community
must demand proper accountability processes starting
with thorough, transparent,
and independent international investigations on all breaches
of international law, including possible acts of war, crime
and genocide in Gaza.
- Well, gee, that's gonna take 20 years.
I mean, realistically, like if you're gonna go back
to every violation of international law,
that's multiple every day for 75 years.
But clearly I think he just means after October 7th.
But let's be realistic about how long this has gone on.
- The fundamental United Nations founding principle
of equality among nations must be as standard
to the state of Palestine.
- I now give the floor
to the distinguished representative of Malaysia.
- Mr. President, My delegation.
Thanks you for convening today's plenary meeting.
Following the joint request by the Arab Group,
non-aligned movement
and the organization of Islamic cooperation,
Malaysia aligns itself with the NAM and OIC statements
and add the following remarks in its national capacity.
Mr. President, after more than seven decades since the
adoption of general assembly resolution 180 1 in 1947,
which partition Palestinians land into Arab
and Jewish states, Palestinians continue
to be denied right to statehood.
In contrast, Israel was accepted
as a full member in 1949.
Since then, the world has been witnessing tomo
and bloodshed in the land of Palestine.
For seven decades, Israel's illegal, brutal,
and inhumane occupation has dispossessed Palestinians
of their lands, properties, rights and dignity.
It has taken the lives of countless numbers of innocent men,
women, and children, and continue to do so to this day.
The current hostilities in Gaza are the latest episode in
the already long history
of Palestinian struggle under Israeli occupation.
After about seven months
of relentless Israeli military onslaught,
more than 35, 30 5,000 deaths have been recorded
about 70% of whom are women and children.
That is nearly 15,000 children and 10,000 women killed.
- Now realize this is recent, right?
This is after the supposed changing of the numbers.
It's not the truth, as you have already proven to you.
If you haven't seen it, go back and look.
It's about identified versus
unidentified, but they're all bodies.
So the numbers are still accurate, at least as far
as we can tell, when the reality being at least
10,000 more under the rubble.
So the numbers are more than we can see based
on every single metric.
And the intelligence and the army
of IDF have made the statements that they are reliable
and accurate, but they'll still lie about it indefinitely.
And they're sitting in this room right now.
So they hear 'em say that they don't,
they it's just about lying
and watering down the information.
- The discoveries of mass graves in the compounds of Als,
Shiva, and Nasir hospitals are deeply concerning.
The numbers of death among humanitarian workers
and media personnel have also reached new records.
The level of destruction of civilian infrastructure,
including schools, hospitals,
and un premises is unprecedented.
The unrelenting destruction of Gaza
and catastrophic humanitarian condition
of its inhabitants are downright appalling.
And despite warnings
of disastrous humanitarian consequences,
Israel remains adamant
to mount a ground military assault of Rafa.
The carnage in Gaza must stop the international community,
must demand proper accountability processes starting
with thorough, transparent,
and independent international investigations on all breaches
of international law, including possible acts of war, crime
and genocide in Gaza.
Mr. President, the question
of Palestine must be resolved once
and for all Israel's occupation must end
justice must be restored.
The self-determination of the Palestinian people
must be upheld.
- I'm gonna leave it there for time,
but you know, it's crazy to think about that.
You know, every, this is the static reality.
It's an occupation. It's been allowed for narrative,
narrative, this narrative that
because of groups like the United States
that are seemingly completely overtaken by Zionist control,
I, I just don't even know why this is not
the most obvious thing in the world.
It's clear that everybody seems to know the UN entities,
the un body, the different UN members,
and yet the media in the western field seems
to scream whatever the government tell, that's
because they're completely taken over by the government.
Now what's it's, it's insulting
as anything else more than anything else,
if you simply hear this information, not just
because he said it, but because it is a provable reality in
15 different ways.
And all you do is go, yeah, it's another Muslim country.
That's why the old Loomer go the route
to just go disregard every distant,
multifaceted idea from different countries.
'cause they're all the same, just
disgusting, bigoted racism.
That's what we're talking about. Like, like the, like the,
like the claims he's making don't have merit
themselves regardless of where you're from.
But it just, people who have hatred will always apply it.
Francesca Albany highlights, I am convincingly Joined,
joined the other UN independent, uh,
experts in condemning the flagrant intimidation tactics
deployed by US congresspersons
against the International Criminal court.
Remember again, Tom Cotton, Mitch McConnell, Ted Budd,
Kevin Kramer, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz,
a lot of the usual suspects.
When elected representatives resort to open threats,
which made themselves amount to offenses, it compels us
to consider the unchecked extents
to which power may be wielded behind closed doors.
The un, the un, uh, UN procedures, rights UN experts to cry,
threats against the ICC by US and Israeli officials.
You, the, these are the criminal acts guys.
What they're doing is belligerent authoritarianism.
They're going, you can't do this to us.
We're too strong for that.
Well, acting like they're the moral authority of the world,
like he just did in front of the un, it's embarrassing.
Now, what just happened shows you
how far this is really going.
While he stands there and acts like you guys are destroying
the un, you don't care about the un.
And again, none of this is to say that I'm siding
with the UN or whatever that might get turned into
by somebody trying to make this about something else.
I've called out the UN forever.
The point is about how it is being applied today
and how the Israeli government is using it or not.
And the point is, they are clearly going after individuals
because of their United Nations,
because they are a part of the United Nations,
because they are in any way against their ongoing genocide,
shooting journalists, shooting doctors, shooting nurses,
shooting, un convoy, shooting aid, convoys,
the cradle reports, as well as the times of Israel.
By the way, Israeli army fires on un convoy in
Rafa kills foreign aid worker.
This is the car itself. UN vehicles been attacked.
You can see the UN riding on the side in
Rafa, by the way, killing the death
of a foreign UN employee.
Now, here's what the UN said themselves,
UN security staff killed in Gaza.
And it says, very clearly confirmed
that the security personnel killed was in fact an
international staff member making it the first such un death
in the Gaza conflict.
So that may not mean much to many people.
It may not mean much to Israel,
but it will mean a lot
to the certain people in the media
argue and the United Nations.
This, I argue, at the very least, if there's any honesty,
any justice out there will become a point of contention.
You can't just keep saying everyone's Hamas,
this was a person that was from the international office
who was there a different, not under the capacity
of ra, and you killed them.
Did you make a mistake? Because here's how this always goes.
Hamas did it, and then it gets proven that it wasn't.
And they go, oh, well then they, it was Hamas' fault.
Oh no, it wasn't. They weren't there.
Oh, well then we misidentified them
and then, you know, it, it's, it's one thing to another
until finally it goes away.
Never accountability.
Now, let's talk about how this gets
dismissed by certain people.
One of the things first I wanna start with is the reality
that based on the numbers, you can do the math yourself.
Israel's killed one journalist in Gaza every 36
hours since October 7th.
In case you hear, didn't hear that correctly.
142 journalists, which I guarantee it's more than that.
214 days from May 11th.
Anyway, that's one journalist every 36
hours since October 7th.
Okay? So we're talking about targeting journalists.
And many of these journalists are not Palestinian.
Many of them are not part of Hamas
or whatever narrative they wanna spin up.
Meaning, you know, overlap with ga hama ga uh,
Gaza infrastructure or part of RA
or whatever else, whatever narrative they turn into being a
monsters, just being a Palestinian.
My point is, there's other people,
a Reuters journalist was killed in
Lebanon in the first week.
Actually, I might be able to pull that up.
Maybe this one. I hope so.
I I'm, I, this I thought was important
because we did our own due diligence on this.
Yep. Reuters journalist killed by Israel bombing.
We reported this the day that it happened. You know why?
Because it was self-evident. It was easy.
Israel, oh, acknowledged fire on the location.
Prior to that, you could prove
that the Reuters journalist had published their location
along with other journalists.
Then after the bombing, other journalists were saying,
we just got bombed by Israel.
And this guy died. I mean, it's, it's,
it's a 1, 2, 3 reality.
It was not hard to see. And
so we reported a Reuters journalist just got killed
by Israel, and it took about a week for them
to even make that claim.
And so my point is, we were
correct and it wasn't hard to see.
So back to the point, Israel's killed this many journalists,
and this is what really depresses me.
Josh Gz cow, I forget how you say his name, who's somebody
that did, I thought did good work during COVID-19
calling certain things out.
He replies by seeing journalists in quotes.
Now look, let's just even say you think some
of them are Hamas members or that,
that we lie as people lied.
You're just gonna dismiss that many people being killed
because some narrative says they're not on your side.
I mean, what kind of moral human being does that?
It just makes me very, very sad
when this person says
they killed three journalists in Lebanon.
Are they Hamas too? And this is my point, and I just said I,
and this, I wasn't, I mean,
obviously this being said is what triggered all this.
And I was responding to this other guy.
I just said, so many have utterly
lost the plot with this topic.
It's very sad. And he says, tell me about it.
And I said, I'll let history be the judge.
I hope you're just somehow unable to see it
and not willfully ignoring it.
Now, I don't know how you wanna frame that as arrogant.
I guess you could argue that because it clearly, I believe
that I'm right, but that's conviction.
It's quite different than arrogance
and saying, I'll let history be the judge.
How in the world is that, that's saying,
let's let the world decide.
That's not arrogance. It's almost the exact opposite.
And I, and he says, that's not an arrogant attitude at all.
I hope your heart is in the right place.
So it's something about this tells me
that he just doesn't see it.
And of course I should say outright, I could be wrong.
That's always possible. I could be missing everything.
And he's completely right. Of course that's possible.
But are we really gonna stand back
and pretend even just what we showed today,
that we're not right in acknowledging
that there is a very clear crime being committed here,
that clearly many journalists have been killed.
And it's not just some brushed off quoted nonsense
that we're watching Reuters journalists,
we're watching innocent people be murdered,
and you're just going journalists
as if you mean they're all Hamas
or just that they shouldn't matter.
He says, I hope your heart's in the right place
and you're not just another run of the mill Jew hater.
Really, man, like everything else, I could have been like,
you know, we can disagree, right?
Like, you know, arrogant, whatever. Put that aside.
But we can just go, okay, we see things differently.
But to go to that, like that's a stupid response.
And what process here,
does it sound like I'm hating Jewish people?
That is a catchall side argument that's meant
to end, that is lazy.
And maybe he believes it. I don't know.
But why, what what, what about
what I'm doing other than the narrative
that if you're doing any of this, you somehow hate Jews?
Makes that make sense?
And he says, please find me an example
where people outlied against the Jews
or proven to be on the right side of history.
Like clearly he is biased to this conversation.
I'm not even saying you're right or wrong about that.
The point is that what do any of this have to do?
That was my overall point that I make every time.
Only racist and Zionists are making this about Judaism.
What I'm talking about are journalists
being murdered by Israel's government.
And somehow we got spun into a conversation about
how Jews on the right side of history,
because he is only that, seeing it through that lens.
I don't care whether they're Jews or Muslims or Christians.
I'm talking about human beings being murdered by a state.
And all you can do is call me a hater of Jews
and shoot horn this whole thing into the historical plight
of the Jews against people that hate them.
It's in overwhelmingly frustrating.
And I simply said, of course, Jew hater, I'm embarrassed
for you since you can't seem to recognize
how ridiculous you are not wasting any more time on you.
Arrogance is everything.
You are right in this conversation, standing by the facts
and saying time will tell is the opposite.
Now, clearly that frustrated me.
So I was a little bit harsh, I think,
but I still think this is important.
Let's, I wanted to go through the rest of it.
So he falls up and says, enjoy your false sense
of noble righteousness as you feed at the trough
of his Islamist propaganda, gorging on tails
of those wicked Jews.
What are we talking about? ip? I mean, Zionists.
No, I do mean Zionists, in fact,
which I'll let my answers explain for themselves.
Am I not actively siding with a Jewish organization
that is literally flying, hiding what Zionism is?
Now you could argue that I'm somehow misled,
but to just pretend like I'm secretly wink,
wink talking about Jews, 'cause I hate them.
I mean, this is blind assumption and it's crazy.
I don't know how smart people can fall into this.
Now look, I could, let's just say I'm wrong about all this.
It is still a lazy br uh, conflation
with nothing but your opinion to back it up.
But you're saying that's the entire point.
And he says, using that word helps
you feel better about yourself.
Uh, right? Like so he knows, he knows me.
I hate Jews, is what he is saying.
And I secretly don't wanna say it out loud.
It makes me depressed
that this is somehow, and again, I'm hoping I weirdly enough
that he is not an honest person now
because if he's an honest person,
and this is really how he's trapped in this conversation,
it makes me go, I we are not gonna win this .
I mean, it's just unbelievable to me
that this can be the conversation between, like I, we were,
I mean we, I think we currently still follow each other.
No, I got,
I think I unfollowed him and unfollowed me .
It's just like, but we were following each other
during COVID-19 conversation.
And here's how I ended the conversation.
I don't know if we replied or not, doesn't look like it.
I said, Zionism is exactly
what I'm calling out right alongside the many, many Jews
and Holocaust survivors I'm standing beside.
Or are they Jew haters too?
I don't know how you make sense of that.
Here's a Holocaust survivor wearing the
keah standing in here.
There's Jews protesting alongside
the Muslims and Christians.
Here's Avi Shalong with that clip.
I play all the time saying Zionism is racism. Okay?
Here was the other response actually the first one in fact.
And this I think is the important part. Let's see.
I don't think there was any, oh, he did. Here's responded.
Let's read it next. Let, so it says, you are
so utterly lost in the narrative created around those
of us calling out the crimes of Israel.
You see what I'm saying? That you seem
to not even remotely know what I'm actually saying.
Like, I mean, look, at the very least, if I'm
explicitly differentiating between the fact
that I'm highlighting the crimes of Israel,
and in fact that I'm actively in many other ways working
alongside and supporting the plight of Jewish people
and X, y, and Z, you could, you could still try to go,
you're misled or that you don't see it,
that you're accidentally doing this.
Sure, I'll disagree with you,
but to just jump over the top of all of it
and say that I'm actually secretly hating Jews.
And that's like, I'm like wring my hands about how,
I mean it's, I it's lunacy to me.
It's an illusion. And I said so blind assumption,
essentially that's what it is.
I thought you were smarter than that.
What tales of wicked Jews am I going on?
Am I gorging on Exactly.
I don't even know what he's talking about.
And I said, and by trough of Islamic propaganda,
are you referring to the verifiable Zionist statements
and historical documents I discussed,
or the ongoing war crimes being committed daily by Israel
that you seem shockingly okay with, interested in
what you are blindly assuming?
I'll see what he says. I haven't seen this yet, right?
Last, that's all he wrote, he says,
and here, I thought you weren't going to waste my time.
I wasn't that you weren't going
to waste any more time on me.
Oh, okay. So you just go to the fact
that I said I'm done talking to you.
That's your response to what I just said.
That's your response to highlighting that you're .
I mean it's just, ugh, it's just so infuriating. It's sad.
It really is sad. Jesus.
I sincerely hope you wake up from your hateful delusion.
See my point, what's my hateful delusion? What do I hate?
Exactly. I'm highlighting the crimes of Israel
and I, you guys get the point.
I mean, I look, am I wrong?
Please tell me, what am I missing?
In, in, in my active effort in everything that I do to fight
for people, whether they're Jewish or Christian or Muslim,
and to support the oppressed, whether they're Jewish
or Christian or Muslim or whatever, religion
or ethnicity in every possible way
with everything that I have.
And I fall into people like this, that just
because they don't agree with me, you secretly hate Jews
and you're a racist and you're the worst person alive.
It's lazy and it really does depress me.
But I think what's worst, what is wor the worst about it is
that I think he genuinely believes this.
I i it that makes me sad, like pains my heart.
But I think it's an important point to recognize.
All of that started with me saying Israel has killed one
journalist every day, every 36 hours since October 7th.
That's how that started. It's crazy to me.
Oh, that's, this is the, i I had it.
I had it lined up already. I forgot.
Now here's important two things.
One early one thing and then a kind of an adaptation of it
that Caitlyn Johnson had to say, which really does
completely apply to what he was saying.
She says, it's insane how we're talking about actual
children getting killed by the thousands.
And they're talking about an entirely fictional antisemitism
crisis that exists nowhere outside of the imagination.
It's like responding to warnings of another Holocaust
by babbling about Sal Ron, Sal Ron.
It's like we're going, oh my god,
civilians are being massacred on a daily basis
by a racist apartheid regime.
And they're saying, oh yeah, well you know what?
We should really be worried about Sal Ron, the dark Lord.
You'd be like, what? I'm, I'm talking about a real thing
and you're actually happening.
That's actually happening to actual real like human beings.
You're talking about a work of fiction by J-R-J-R-R Tolkien.
And she says, oh, so you're just gonna dismiss Sal Ron's
plan to o overrun middle earth with orca hordes.
As soon as he recovers for the one ring, they'd say,
what are you some kind of moral lover?
And she says, what the hell are you babbling about?
Do you protest? We're talking about actual physical people
being ripped apart by actual physical military explosives.
And you're talking about some imaginary fantasy land.
Like it's some real thing.
How are we supposed to address this actual real life problem
when you only wanna talk about something
that has no existence outside of the realm of imagination?
And they'd say, I guess you just hate hobbit .
And she goes, I mean, how would you even
argue with someone like that?
How do you even debate someone
with about a real life problem
of unparalleled urgency when all they want
to talk about is a completely made up crisis
that absolutely is not happening in this material plane.
It's the most infuriating thing in the world.
Now obviously you, you know what?
There, you know, she is never
saying that there is no racism.
And that's one thing she didn't express there.
And I guarantee she got overwhelmed with comments,
which is why she made another point about it.
And she says the same thing in here.
Nobody's saying there is no antisemitism.
The argument is that it is a fictional dark cloud
overtaking this country.
I mean, I even saw Joe Rogan talking with, what's his name,
that Gad guy and the like expressing the same damn lazy
unverifiable thing that comes from statistics.
Like she points out here that there's this overwhelming
reality look, there are disgusting people that clearly feel
the willingness to come out
and say disgusting things about Jewish people
or anybody else right now, but to pretend that
that's any more than it's ever been.
Or there's some overwhelming secret
cloud overtaking this country.
And all they're doing is pointing at people saying Free
Palestine, all they're doing is manipulating lying
and manufacturing things about entire groups
of half Jewish protests.
How do we pretend that makes sense?
How do people like Josh not,
are they not capable of seeing that?
Are you saying that that Holocaust survivor
Josh is a racist?
Or are you saying that all
of those Jewish organizations secretly hate Jews?
I mean, there's only, you can't pretend that
because I'm supporting this,
that I'm somehow a Jew hater without acknowledging
that you're also calling Holocaust survivors
and Jewish organizations Jew haters.
The point is they never say that, which makes me go,
well then are they being willfully dishonest?
Here's what she says. One of the most in, uh,
frustrating things happening in the world right now is the
way people of conscience are doing everything they can
to bring a stop to Israel's us back.
TOIs and Gaza and Israel's supporters are responding to this
by pointing to an epidemic of antisemitism,
which has no existence outside their imaginations,
but we're all expected to pretend
it's real and worthy of respect.
She says the duo spent, oh, and this shocks about Dr.
Phil , that completely fake doctor
and Benjamin Netanyahu, that completely fake president
or premier, whatever you wanna call him, uh, prime minister
and the guy's a complete criminal, his own people hate him,
but you know, whatever that they talk
about justifying the genocide,
that's really all it was about.
It was a painful thing to watch.
And the duo she writes, spent a lot of time
smearing anti genocide protestors at US universities
as evil Jew haters.
You see where it comes from At one point, Netanyahu who went
so far as to advance the ridiculous suggestion
that this sudden wave of support
for Palestinians has nothing to do
with Israel's actions in Gaza, not at all,
but is solely due to a massive explosion antisemitism,
which just so happens to coincide with those actions.
It's not, he says quote, it's not directed at what we do.
It's directed at who we are.
What a casual way
to disregard all of your murderous actions.
And look, you could say maybe some
people hate 'em just 'cause who they are.
I'm sure that's, I'm sure that does happen.
But to pretend that the vast majority of the world
that's going, we care about what you're doing
to those people only hate Jews, is shockingly stupid.
He said at about the protest adding it's an anti-Semitic
explosion that threatens all of civilization.
My god, anti-Semitic activity he says has gone up 360% in
America since October 7th and it was already high, uh,
before October 7th, then it's gone up 360%.
Dr. Phil responds furious agreement. Yes, agreed.
That's a lie. By the way, as she writes,
the TV man is citing a fake statistic from the A DL who
after October 7th began categorizing every single
pro-Palestine rally as anti-Semitic incidents,
including rallies, organized
and attended by Jewish organizations.
This propagandistic manipulation allowed the Israeli friend
Israel friendly mass media
to falsely report a massive spike in antisemitism in the
wake of October 7th, which had not actually occurred.
Then you get the Rogans and Joshs
and the rest of them that are either too blind to seed
or don't care who end up feeling it's real.
I mean it's as simple as that. Now again, there's racism,
but you don't need to make
that up if it's as bad as you're saying it is.
And the point is just like January 6th, which by the way,
I don't know why Republicans who are buying this can't see
that same old toy
where they said every single arrest we had from OC from
January 6th was all at domestic terrorism.
You know, that grandma with a cell phone that did nothing
that went down as domestic terrorism.
That's when they went, oh my god,
domestic terrorism's up 300%.
Same damn thing.
And by the way, they called them all anti-Semitic too.
And I guarantee that's part of it.
You know, the same people that are now blindly supporting
Israel were called anti-Semitic 30 seconds ago.
But who cares? Unreal.
She finished by saying, of course, real anti-Semitism,
by which I mean prejudice against Jews as a group
and reality being that semetic
far more than just Jews in regard to
what se semis really are.
But let's ignore that point for a minute.
She says, it obviously exists, no one would deny that.
But it's a fringe position in our
society, which I agree with.
And it's most never
what you're hearing about when Israel
apologists are talking.
In fact, you very seldom see Israel apologists in
institutions like the A DL who are supposedly responsible
for fighting antisemitism, going
after actual antisemites
who harbor actual ill will towards Jewish people.
I argue it's because Zionists need that
to justify their existence.
It says what you typically see them doing instead
of using the antisemitism label to falsely smear people
of conscience who criticize the
actions of the state of Israel.
That's what it comes down to.
But you could overlap this with so many different points.
Like we said in the beginning, the reality of
what Zionism truly was, the lie about,
whether they were willing to, or the, the reality
of whether they were willing to sacrifice the Arab Jews
to get what they wanted, the overlap with the Nazi,
both Nazi or ideology
and even once tried to align themselves with stolen.
This was the Lehigh party.
It's, you could look it up in Wikipedia,
but of course I'll get called a Jew hater
by Josh for pointing it out.
It's just infuriating.
It continues to be so obvious
they're not going after this at all.
In fact, they're continuing to use this
to justify its existence in so many different ways.
There's no place on earth, not because of Palestine.
And let's not forget the thing they're claiming is making
them a threat from Palestine is Hamas, which Israel funded
the most dangerous place in the world
for Jews is in the state of Israel because of Zionism.
That's the reality. There are Jews all over the world,
safe in plenty of countries, the argument
that somehow Jews in the United States are not safe
because Israel's there
or wouldn't be if Israel wasn't there.
Makes no logical sense whatsoever.
And just since I mentioned it, let's make sure we remember
that yes, everything you're talking about has
to also be considered in the context of
what Israel allowed because of this. So
- Are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted
Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?
- Yeah, sure. He deliberately
and systematically even, even told on record, whoever wants
to avoid the threat of a two state solution has
to support my policy of
pain protection money to the Hamas.
So what we did, uh, with the permission
of our Prime Minister is to let Qatar,
to transfer a huge amount of money in cash,
probably more than $1.4 billion By doing
it, we increased the power of Hamas.
We did everything in order to make sure
that Hamas will go on controlling Gaza
and Palestinian authority will control the West Bank.
So they will fight each other
- That the plan, keep them at odds
so we can stop the two-state
solution we were pretending we wanted.
Now, another point I think is insulting is that
as we're being called racist and,
and you know, Jew haters for pointing out the crimes
of Israel, you have people like this who, by the way,
this guy in this, look at the way this guy,
there's something off with this guy , just,
he looks like he's on drugs or something.
He's threatening, he's ly in this video.
It just seems strange to me, by the way.
Just look at him the way he's talking.
But the point is he's using,
he literally says emergency appeal
to the Jewish diaspora, Israel.
Israel needs you to vote for Eurovision.
Like, am I the only one that finds
that detest like disgusting?
You're literally using, as I said,
it's shameless and disgusting to use.
All that's happening and the
endless scientist lies around it.
All the crimes you're committing to marshal support
for a stupid music contest.
Why? Because you think it's important for you guys
to win this for, I mean, it just is makes me disgusted that
that's what you're caring about.
Like rallying the Jews to vote for this contest.
Doesn't that seem really gross and stupid?
And I said, I said, oh, by the way, while I wrote this,
10 children were murdered in Gaza.
People are simply boycotting all those
who support Israel's genocide.
That what he is doing is going look at they're
booing her because she's a Jew.
No, they're booing her because she's supporting Israel.
She's there in Eurovision.
Ask yourself why that makes sense.
'cause Israel's not in Europe on behalf
of a genocidal state.
That's the point. I'm sure somebody out there
is doing it because they're racist.
But the point is that you can't keep pretending
that everybody boycotting Israel.
Hey, it's Jews, Josh, because that's what you're doing
now, here is the UN ambassador,
the one we just made fun of a second ago.
Guess what he's doing? Same thing, calling on all the Jews
of the world to divest from universities,
allowing antisemitism.
So it's just this clumsy, reactive games. They keep playing.
So what they're doing is trying to like reinitiate
the same thing in reverse.
Come do your campus protest and pro
and divest from their antisemitism,
which doesn't even make sense, divest from the university.
So what you're telling 'em to stop paying their tuition
because they had semi, I
don't think you think these things through.
The point is you're asking the other side of,
it's asking them to divest from their war funding, not
that they're gonna stop paying your tuition.
Like you, you could certainly do that,
but they're gonna go goodbye .
You're gonna lose your job. It's silly.
The point is, you're trying to make a big statement about
how you're pushing back and it says,
and assure your pro Hamas faculty and presidents get fired.
You mean the one supporting Palestine? Of course.
'cause you're clumsy with your, your termed,
but your terms, excuse me.
He says he used the Holocaust memory event set up a near
Columbia University campus and staging
and as his staging post.
So first of all, just the idea of trying
to recreate this in reverse.
It's the same thing as everything else.
So it's bad when they do it.
When we do it, it's justified, right?
I mean, would it be different if you're occupying the campus
and asking for them to stop being racist?
I guess. I guess he's what he's saying, but,
and fire the ones we don't like,
and then until then we won't leave.
Okay. So what, what's the difference?
It's just so silly, but here's what he says
that I think is more important again,
- To today means
that Jew haters must pay a heavy price. So I,
- Oh, is that what it means?
I've been misunderstanding never again. This whole time.
I thought never again meant we won't allow genocide again.
Apparently it only means Jew haters, we must be punished.
That's what never again means that we have to go out
and attack the ones that we think
are saying things we don't like.
Get it. So it's okay to commit genocide
that we never said never again in regard to genocide,
we said never again means Jew haters have to be punished.
I mean, it's just silly
- Call on you today.
Not only you here, all Jews across the United States
and around the world divest from universities
that allow anti,
- It doesn't even make sense divest.
Are they invested in them or are they paying them tuition?
He's just using the same language
because he is trying to tap into the same movement.
These people are shockingly bad at what they do.
Never again is now you're right.
But what he's actually saying is never again is
what we are dealing with.
So it's the same as the clip for Mother's Day.
So as you're murdering children
and the world is going,
I mean including massive Jewish organizations,
most Jewish people, I mean, most
of these protests we've shown you are in some cases half
Jewish people, not even including
the organizations involved.
And they're going never again means never again,
right now for Palestinians.
And instead you go never again means
people being racist against us.
You're literally comparing a ra.
Uh, what you claim is an a a,
even if you wanna pretend it's what you say it is.
If it is not an overwhelming cloud of racism, that that
is more important than murdering all these children.
I mean, I just don't think they actually think about this
stuff or they don't know what else to do.
Now, here are some important solidarity
moments around the world.
'cause this has gone global, guys. That's the reality.
Protests a in Greece, in support of Gaza calling for an end
to the invasion of Rafa.
This is then, and by the way, not only the protests,
but the police violence against the protests
that are almost entirely, I mean, look at the picture.
That's an important thing that I,
that I've been talking about for a while.
Coordination, right?
When you start to get attacked,
you put your hands in the air the fact
that they're gonna attack you because these are
belligerent authoritarians.
But when somebody looks at that, it's impossible
to pretend like you're some kind of terrorist group.
You're a peaceful entity and they're naming you dangerous
because of your ideas.
That is what we've alway, that that is the authoritarian.
That is everything we claim. We've always fought.
And you're seeing that the groups that are claiming
to be on the side of those things have
never truly cared about them.
That's the reality. And you're seeing, look at the police
beating them with batons.
These are, they're not armed with anything.
They're beating chil young kids with batons
because they just don't want them there anymore.
Is that democracy?
That's Amsterdam. And this is another angle.
This is Dutch police can be seen
repeatedly beating pro-Palestine protestors lying
defenseless on the ground.
This is not new. This happens everywhere right now.
Sorry for the cussing in the background. Look at this.
They're beating this person in the corner. Nothing new.
Anybody wanna explain that for us? How does that make sense?
Hatred. That's why. Oops, don't trip moron.
Now, five pillars points out student protests continue
to spread like wildfire across the us following several
violent attempts with police,
and they write pro-Israel thugs
to remove the campus encampments by force.
The campus encampment movement has gone global
with many springing up like the UK and, and,
and Israel and Europe, excuse me.
Also, I want to, uh, include this.
Dammit. Uh, what did I call that?
Uh, nope, it's not a gun.
I wanted to find that, what I discussed.
I'll, I'll find it real quickly. Here's the, the article
that I went over this in depth
because I'm not gonna go into it crazy right now,
but the bottom line is whatever you think about what some
of these people may be thinking
or the, the broad stroke assumptive a arguments
with very little to back them up about how it's all CIA
and go George Soros, even though there's a very small aspect
of that that goes back to 2021.
It certainly could mean what you think it means,
but there's no evidence to suggest
that it's overcome everything they're doing right now.
And even aside from all of that, that it's, if you think
that any of that disregards the provable obvious crimes
being committed in Israel right now, you're being blinded
by two party politics.
My point is that regardless of
what you think individuals may think
this has taken on a life of its own
that is very clearly broken outta the control
of the two party illusion.
Because it's not partisan,
just like they wanted you to think Covid was partisan.
This is not partisan. These are Republicans and Democrats
and those that see through both sides and they're dues
and Christians and Muslims and atheists and everybody.
I've gone over every angle that's on the show.
It's every angle and they are all standing up
and fighting for what's going on.
And all they can do is call them all a bunch
of pro Hamas rapists
and then beat them up for their free speech.
That's what's happening.
And it's gone.
Global campus protest over the war in Gaza have now gone
international, which I already, I already framed for you.
Oh, that's right. I opened that.
So yeah, well, I'll grab it later.
What was the name of that? I did a show about that.
I forget now the main title of it.
Anyway, I want you to hear what she has to say.
I'll, I'll look for it while I play this.
This is important as Stop Cop City Rights.
You can find this level of detail at any
protest, which I agree with.
The key is Al Jazeera actually lets her speak
us Corporate media has no interest in educating viewers
most, but mostly dumbing down protests
and would cut her off with some dumb SHIT.
But do you condemn Moss? Truth is not the media's goal here.
And on top of that, many times they find a person
that's not actually part of their protest to explain
what they think that they use, what they can.
A lot of these media are very clearly leaning towards
Israel's side and will happily try to cut out things.
And we've seen over and over.
My point is you'll find
people that don't know what's going on.
You'll find people that are there just to be there.
But you'll also find in every single one of them,
people like this that will happily explain
exactly what's going on.
But you will not see this in corporate media
- Broadly start with disclosure and divestment.
As of right now, students do not have access to
where their money is going when they pay tuition
fees to this university.
So crucially, our first demand is full disclosure
of financial investments
- Crucially about Israel. Right?
- Well, we want to know where all of the money is going.
We think that that's key for students to know
where their money is going, whether
it's about Israel or not.
Mm-Hmm, . But then with this knowledge,
we would like to pursue full divestment from two things.
First, from all arms manufacturing companies,
whether it's the current genocide and Gaza
or other armed conflict around the world,
our university should not be investing in
that this is a situation where we should be learning
and contributing to education
and a safe community not to international conflict.
And secondly, we request
and demand that the university divest from all holdings
and any entities that sponsor
or are complicit in Israeli occupation apartheid in the
current genocide in Gaza.
Additionally, we have boycott demands, key
of which is the demand to stop banking with Barclays,
which the university currently does.
Mm-Hmm. Barclays has been complicit in the
architecture of Israeli apartheid.
And so that's a key demand from the boycott, divestment
and sanctions global movement.
And our last demand is that the university commits
to a Palestinian led rebuilding
of the gazen higher education sector. Okay.
- So how much linkup have you had with the,
the movement in the United States
and with, with other student protests in the uk?
- Yeah, so crucially, I mean,
the US movement set off a global chain of reaction
and we're so excited to be a part of that
and thankful to the US encampments for what they began.
We've had a lot of support from them in terms of logistics,
general Conrad ship, giving us tips and tricks.
But really the UK movement, um,
has also learned a lot from them in terms of
how our goals are so similar.
Although the US and the UK have different contexts,
the UK government is similarly
complicit in Israeli war crimes.
And so too our institutions of higher education.
So we learned a lot from them in terms of our demands, how
to engage with our governments
and how to mobilize students in the uk.
We also have really collaborated with other universities.
Oxford is so proud to be launching in tandem with Cambridge.
This is the first time in like social movement history
that Oxford and Cambridge have
launched a campaign on the same day.
- Right? It's crazy that you'll find that every you,
every one of these protests there, you many people
that are very aware of what's going on
and not surprising the media has a vested interest in
absolutely misrepresenting exactly what the empire asks.
Now, I, this is why I framed this
before on the April 29th,
people verse empire worldwide revolution against tyranny,
oppression, and Zionism framed as antisemitism.
That was, I mean, I frankly thought this is
worldwide in the sense that I was seeing things like this,
like Yemen standing up in their support.
This was before I literally saw campus protest popping up in
Japan and Germany.
Like this has taken on a life of its own.
And here's what Robert wrote in the May 4th
pro-Palestine students protest pro-Palestine student
protest, prove who truly stands for free speech.
We'll get into that right now.
Now here, mayor Jeremy Levy, Levi
mayor, town of Hampstead,
he says here in Edmonton, it's encouraging.
He says, to witness Canada taking a stand against such
unacceptable behavior, you know,
like protected speech on protest.
Look at,
oh, how, how proud we're
of the belligerent violence against
peaceful sitting protestors.
Why? Because we don't like what they think.
I mean, it's amazing to me
that especially Republicans at this point, whether in Canada
or the United States, can't recognize
that all they're doing is saying this idea is
now X, Y, and Z.
Therefore we can't allow it, which is
what they were just saying.
And by the way, still think about your ideology,
Republicans, aren't you?
The whites, vanilla, ISIS, antisemite, supremist.
I mean, isn't that exactly what's going on?
And right now you're getting manipulated
to supporting suppression for speech
because they've convinced
you that there's a bunch of lefties.
I just don't, I can't believe people
can fall for stuff like this.
And even though it is some of the lefties, it's all
of a lot of other people too.
Either way, even if it was every single person from the
left, all funded by George Soros, they are still
suppressing their rights right in front of you
and cheering along our people
that 30 seconds ago were saying that
that shall not be infringed.
He says, taking a stand against unacceptable behavior,
what you mean is unacceptable thoughts.
Even though they're, most of them aren't
even thinking what you pretend they are.
It says it's regrettable that such measures are necessary.
No, it's not. You don't think it's regrettable.
You wouldn't think it's regrettable if you're using them
right now to suppress peaceful people, to address those
who express support for Hamas.
And there it is. That's the only way they think they can get
through this is by pretending
that you're secretly supporting terrorism.
They're even passing legislation that argues by, by saying,
free Palestine, you
therefore wink, wink support Hamas, which means you're
therefore a terrorist, which
means therefore we can arrest you.
That's where this is going.
That means by not even saying
or thinking what they pretend you do, you can go to jail
because they say you think and, and say that's crazy.
That's the same. Same as saying the state
of Israel committed a crime, you're an antisemite,
and one step further, you go to jail
because you're actually threatening me with violence
by saying Israel committed a crime.
There is currently legislation in the United States
that says just that countering antisemitism.
Bill says that if we say anything,
which is like Zionism is not Judaism, that Israel
and the foundation
of Zionism align itself with Nazi Germany.
These are real things. But if you say it
because of the Holocaust Museum definition that you're now
dangerous, we'll see what happens.
I'm not gonna shy away from the truth
because of unjustifiable, unconstitutional,
illegal legislation carried out by people
that don't care about America.
Zachary Foster, who, who's who I interviewed
with must be playing tomorrow, he says,
you're quote encouraged
by seeing police assault unarmed civilians sitting on a lawn
protesting a genocide.
I mean, think about how crazy that is.
He said, dear Canada, please make sure this toxic human
being never serves public office again.
Excuse me. Now, here's the crazy part.
This guy's, the mayor has, uh, not
that many followings, that's probably why.
But Zachary Foster, in response,
it's 2,400 likes in his statement gets 864.
I just want you to recognize
that even his following supports
what Zach says more than this,
because I don't think anybody supports this.
I think we're being gaslit into something very dangerous.
Now, Dave Smith writes,
and I think this is an important point.
Four years ago after George Floyd, George Floyd's death,
a massive protest movement started across the country.
The protest quickly turned violent,
almost nightly in cities across the country.
Riots broke out. We all remember that the lies around it,
the reality, we could see many people were
murdered, thousands were assaulted.
Billions of dollars in property damage were committed.
In the face of this, the corporate
media cited with the rioters.
They stood in front of the fires calling the
riots mostly peaceful.
Now, even then, you should point out
that there were examples of things
and verbs that were believing they were fighting
for equality and were not burning things down.
That was the part that at the time, the two party illusion,
extreme side of the right did never you're wrong.
You're supporting beyond. No,
it's just nuance and you can prove that's the case.
But I agree that mostly this was misrepresented.
There was a, it was shockingly violent.
Any rights are cartoonishly militarized police seeming
to finally have a purpose for existing.
And it means that in a kind of facetious sense, stood down
and allowed the mob to terrorize American
citizens objectively.
The current free Palestine protests are nothing like this.
They actually have been mostly peaceful.
Let's not forget, by the way, as we covered,
an actual scientific study was done that showed you 99%
of these were peaceful
and it wasn't some Palestine leaning group.
It was an objectively, you know,
whatever you would think about mainstream entities.
The point is you could look at it for yourself.
And by the way, it's objectively self-evident.
It is the case. If they have
to lie about these things repeatedly,
it's obviously not what they're saying.
Saying, my point is that he's right though,
and that yet they're now saying,
this is what we should care about.
While allowing the riots
before he says, there have been isolated instances
of violence and a few have a few made up hoaxes.
He says, watching the media coverage, the police responds,
uh, has been sickening, particularly when you remember 2020.
The bottom line is that they thought those protests hurt
Trump and these ones hurt Biden.
Now that I don't agree with this, to me,
dangerously falls back into the illusion of the two party.
I don't believe that. I don't believe I,
I think your government as an entity is allowing
or not these things in any circumstance.
I don't believe that it's some,
I I know these things play a factor,
but if we boil this down to they allow these
and not those, that means that you're talking about
Democrats versus Republicans
and at the end of the day,
that's not really what's going on.
Not when it comes to these kind of bigger issues that,
not my opinion, but the very least.
But it says there are a lot
of things I don't like he says about these protests,
but the major issues come down
to the words they're hollering
and blocking college kids from a building.
It's important to remember the real story here isn't some
left wing 20 year olds.
It's what Israel is doing, the Gaza
and our criminal government funding and arming it.
Exactly. Now, this I thought was even more important.
Clandestine says, well put, unfortunately the optics
made by many of the protestors
contaminated the actual message
that was supposed to be portrayed.
It says it was hijacked by left wingers trying
to make it about L-G-B-T-Q.
Now, it just, it really made me sad.
But I saw that because the truth is that there were some of
that, I certainly saw it myself,
but in no cases that I see this about, like trying to let,
let's put it this way, in my opinion,
what he's describing is what the media presented.
So sadly, even people like this that I think see
through the illusions, even call it the media still got
played by the partisan media when they tried to convince you
that it was lefty George S's protest in
order to get us to dismiss.
And that's what happened. That's not the reality.
My point is the same. There were some over, I saw many
of the, you know, then we'll do an L-G-B-T-Q talk
after this Palestine protest.
But by and large, and I have looked at all of them,
they are not partisan.
They are left and right
and people that I argue mostly don't care about the
illusion bottom line.
It's not the, the idea that this was some kind
of a lefty thing that contaminated the per, that was
what the media wanted you to think.
And unfortunately, two party politics still play a factor,
even for those that see through it.
Overall, I think it's very obvious that this was
superseded two party politics in every possible way.
And if it got, if it contaminated the message, that's
because we allowed that The message was
there the whole time.
And if you chose to let pink hair on a mask,
stop you from seeing it.
That's not on the person that's on the
message or the the receiver.
That's my personal opinion. I'm gonna,
I like clandestine, I like the work he does.
I'm just highlighting that this is an interesting problem
that even myself that we all fall into where we allow
the two party politics
to taint the conversation and not the other way around.
Now, in regard to speech, here's Matt Finn, I'm not familiar
with, oh, from Fox News.
Shocking highlighting pro-Palestinian
protestors, right?
So first of all, these are some women wearing, you know,
whether they're bottom line clearly supporting Palestine
and I I don't need to play it.
They're, they're, what they're saying is Oink oink,
piggy piggy will make your lives S-H-I-T-T-Y.
Okay? Care, agree with it or not.
It's free speech and it's actually not
even that big of a deal.
There's plenty of people that say there's plenty
of right-wing cop, uh, what do they call that?
You know, people that film cops don't for
to make a cop accountability counts.
That would call them pigs too,
or the whatever the people, the bottom line is, it's,
this is a very small thing.
All they're doing is calling out the, the cops
because at least in this case, they're,
they perceive them to be.
And look, the NYPD has taken a very clear pro-Israel
stance, okay?
And this person's to Tommy Lauren,
a a Republican says one way ticket to Iran.
Like, do we not see the lunacy in that?
Somebody who in every other circumstance, like in regard
to everything around Republicans
and censorship, would scream about
how woke politics is used being used to suppress speech.
And then here they are using culture, identity, politics
to suppress speech.
Are you, is she not allowed to say that? No.
Look, she's just making an opinion point.
She's not saying censor their speech,
but a one way ticket to Iran.
Why are Ron? Are are they, I mean, this is just
so clum the idea that, oh,
they're all Muslims, they're all Arabs.
Like this is gross. This is the kind of thing
that we need to make a note about.
That's how these people think.
And I, and it's typical right wing, extreme level side.
I don't mean extreme like ideology.
I just mean like at the highest level of their,
like Fox News, the bigger pundits
where you just ignore things
that matter when you wanna make a good point.
But here's what Daniel, uh, Greenfield said.
Any nation that fails to deport Jihadists
taunting the N-Y-P-D-A generation
after nine 11 is a failed state.
God man, we're in a dangerous way when people like this
are, are influencing people.
Now, I'm not saying they shouldn't, of course they have
every right to say what they want
and people can listen to 'em.
That's free speech. But we're at a dangerous point in time
when this is, people are listening to this
and it in it, it matters.
And the only time when that it wouldn't is if we have real
free speech, no censorship
where things like this could be called out
for the ignorant nonsense that they are, that first of all,
these are women.
I mean, for all I know Americans, I don't think, you know,
either they're in the United States.
So the bottom line is the point is
that they're standing there protesting
and saying what they want, which they have a right to do.
And you're, you're calling them Jihadists, first of all,
and saying they should be deported.
Why? Because of their free speech.
Like, can you imagine what this person would say if we were
talking about trucker convoys?
Isn't that what the lefty said? Look at them. They're Nazis.
Look at they're saying, saying, uh,
you know, make America great.
That means wink wink. We believe in Nazi racism.
That's what they were doing. It's the same exact thing.
I just don't know why they can't see it.
I don't think they want to. And this person says,
what do you do about those born here?
Exile them. That's what this person writes.
And he writes in, he writes, denaturalize
and deport support
for a foreign enemy group is a de demonstration
of a change of allegiance.
I can't believe this pe this is
what people believe know this is not very much engaged with.
But what he's saying is that if you're an American
and you say the wrong thing, he wants the government
to denaturalize and deport you.
So how long Daniel, until they decide
that you're a racist white supremacist
because you support X, y,
and ZI mean, they either don't care that that's possible
or they're pushing for some other kind of agenda.
It's, it's terrifying that people like this exist.
This person responded to that saying,
Palestinians are the most privileged refugee
group in the world.
It's okay to vomit a little bit in your mouth,
having not one un relief.
I just say about two, the Palestinians have UNR for life
that this person is so shockingly uninformed,
it makes my teeth hurt.
And of course he goes an entire UAHG dedicated to one group.
They're stupid or lying.
The bottom line is it's refugees
that have never been allowed to go back to their home.
In fact have been bombed and raped and pillaged
and displaced many right up until this very moment.
Ara is the agency about the right of return
that is documented where they should go back to when Israel
actually acknowledges international law
and allows the right of return, which they never have.
The others are about refugee agencies in regard to aid
and support, but they, who cares about facts?
Who cares about understanding what's going on?
Let's just scream racism and Jew hate
and ignore the whole thing because Gaza's equal Hamas.
Right? Because isn't that what we're all being told
that we're all Hamas and so kill 'em all
because that's international
law and that's the right thing to do.
Yeah. Deport them because they've got bad ideas.
How is this where we are? Edward Snowden writes Painful.
How many Americans suddenly think free speech is this narrow
little thing full of ca carve outs not meant
to protect offensive radical or even violent ideas
because it is though.
That's the point. That's what he's saying.
The First Amendment was authored by men
who famously advocated for armed insurrection.
But oopsie, we're not supposed to point that out right now
because that makes it make sense
with what's going on in Palestine.
You know, resistance, not the kidnapping,
not whatever you think happened around it,
but the actual legal act of arm resistance
that really was carried out on October 7th makes them all
so angry when you point out that provable fact the Tree
of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time
with the blood of Patriots.
And tyrants famously said Thomas Jefferson.
The bottom line is this is Edward Snowden calling out the
hypocrisy of all these gigantic right-wing influencers
and many of the left as well
who are just acting like these people shouldn't exist.
You're not allowed to have these ideas
or that free speech is somehow limited.
Now that's what's happening.
And you're allowing it if you're,
if you're pretending this is okay, here's an example of
where Fox News normalizes this kind of ignorance.
Woo.
- That one of the main issues is just the way
that speech is being promoted because
although I do believe that free speech should be allowed,
of course in America, Hmm, I think that,
- But - A lot of the speech is not being og
or is not actual free speech
and should not be classified as such and
- , this person doesn't
even know what they're talking about.
That's stupid. That's like saying,
so I believe in free speech,
but I don't think every free speech will be free.
So you don't believe in free speech then. Okay, got it.
- I think that there's also something
to be said about the lack of speech
that Jewish students are being, um, silenced
- The lack of speech that Jude students are being silenced
with for of No, the point is, what you're trying
to suggest is that somehow Jewish students are
less able to speak out.
In what way in what world is that happening?
It's the exact opposite.
And it's, it's because right now they're be given,
they're being given a spotlight.
It's not even something like, uh,
dishonest in the sense that it's being done.
So we think there's a bigger problem.
But my point is that it's not some kind of mani,
they're just choosing to highlight
what they say more than anybody else in the world right now.
And you're saying that they're somehow having less speech?
No. What you're literally doing is
trying to pretend that's the case.
So you can advocate for suppression of speech
of people highlighting that problem and then saying,
but I agree with free speech though.
That's like the US saying we support your sovereignty.
And then when they bolt them outta the country, they go, no,
but we support your sovereignty.
It's a rack for you. Mm.
- We aren't allowed to talk. We aren't allowed to speak.
I've walked past these protests and I'm,
- You're not allowed to talk or speak.
Look, how does a journalist sit
there and not push back on that?
Explain for me how you're not allowed
to speak now if you're trying to say
that you were too afraid to speak, that which
by the way is completely on you
and not even remotely actually what's happening.
That's not even remotely the same thing
as you're not allowed to speak.
This is such a grotesque perversion of what's happening.
Like even if you think there's a problem here,
why are we being lied to about it
and why are you not honest enough to highlight that?
There's very much dishonesty within this conversation.
You're at the very least embellishing this,
like the stabbing of the eye that turned out to be nothing
of the kind yet still got paired across every media point.
- And I'm scared. I I can't say anything to them. I
- Just wanna say something that's been
incredibly frustrating in my eyes and I'm
- Sure a lot, and by the way, I guess she ignored the half
of them that are Jewish or the
Holocaust survivor standing with them.
'cause she was scared. A lot of
- Them will agree.
There are these token Jews, that's what I like to call them,
who basically renounce their Judaism don't associate
with Judaism in the slightest bit.
Even to me, they've renounced their Judaism.
I I was at a tabling event earlier this year
for Miss Rocki heritage month,
and this kid who's like, the prominent face
of JVP told me I renounced my Judaism JVP.
- This is so insulting.
Like, so here's what you're, here's what he's saying.
That everybody there that's a Jew is not actually a Jew.
Not only that, that they secretly renounce their Judaism.
It's so shockingly the opposite.
I wonder whether this person is been,
I don't know if you think that, look, let's put it this way.
He's either making that up
or is there to be part of this deception.
Like the bottom line is you don't know every single
person that's part of these groups.
So to say that you somehow know they're all token Jews when
half of these groups are Jewish, when most
of these protests have been put on by Jewish organizations
who are actively highlighting their Judaism
and highlighting that Zionism is a manipulation of it.
I I don't buy this. But even e either way, that means that,
let's just say he's not put there
to be part of the deception.
He is lying to you. There's no way around it.
He didn't speak to every person that was there.
Now they're all token Jews, just like Ben Shapiro saying,
you're supporting AMAs, you're a useful idiot.
Or anybody else saying you're not Jewish if
you don't support Zionism.
Oh, so that means it's about Zionism then and not Judaism,
- Jewish voices for peace.
Got it. Um, anyway, so he told me himself
that he renounces his Judaism,
but then, you know, the second CNN comes,
he puts on a tallest, he puts on his kippah
and he sits in the middle of the camp
Oh, and leaves a Seder.
And what's really frustrating there is
that there are guys like Mark Ruffo from the outside
who are, you know, hopping in from their high horse
saying there's no antisemitism.
Mark Ruffo, I understand
that you're famous, but you're not on campus.
Also there's Professor Howley,
- You mean aside from all the other Jews who are not part
of the protest, who actively spoke out and highlighted that,
or people like Michael Tracy
who walked right through it and talked to me.
It's insulting. Like these people I think are willfully
deceptive right now.
What? You can decide what the intent is,
but that's shocking to me then.
And on top of that, let's be,
there's another possibility here.
Like the way that they misrepresented
what he said at the Grammys, remember that
he did not come out and say, I renounce my Judaism.
His argument was that he is essentially embarrassed
to be aligned with the people who are claiming that
they are clearly misrepresenting what's being said
in the context of the Grammys.
He did. Now he came out after the fact
and be like, they're lying about what I said.
The point is, I find it really hard to believe
that these people who are actively highlighting these things
are gonna say that I'm secretly not Jew,
but it's certainly possible.
But aside from that, what does he have
to say about the Holocaust
survivor who is sitting next to them?
Is that guy also a fake Jew? As
- A Holocaust survivor, my message
to the brave student protestors in America is
just keep doing it.
Don't give up. We are doing exactly the same.
And in the long term, we are going to prevail.
I'm out from the beginning at every March a small
- the Jewish professor
who I've never seen associate
with the Jewish community once come in,
- Oh, so he's not Jewish.
If he doesn't do what you think you should do.
Like, do you get the hubris in all of this too
- And say they're teaching about antisemitism here.
So clearly there's no antisemitism,
but Professor Halle, the same kids
who are teaching about antisemitism are also
the modern day Nazis.
They're the ones saying, wow, let's globalize the Intifada.
Let's target Jews. They're the
- One, no, they did not say, let's target Jews.
That was exposed to be a complete lie.
The tar, the global Inda is talking about
resistance to oppression.
You know, you know, the, the idea that these things get
so grossly misrepresented.
My point is he knows that he's lying.
There's no way around it.
All of this or, or he is just
so completely lost in the narrative.
Like, I dunno, maybe Josh
and the rest of them, I don't know.
But that's shocking to me. The real time.
The global, the, the modern day Nazis.
You're talking about Jewish students.
I mean, my god, that's crazy. Once
- Who are encouraging harassment against Jews. No,
- They're not.
Again, nobody is encouraging harassment against anybody
other than the Zionist protesters who
relentlessly have been proven by the police,
by the observers, by the journalists
that are ones creating the violence.
Again, there are like, as David Smith said,
and plenty of us said that there are examples
that are on the outskirts.
You could see individuals.
The point is that the way they're framing this
is shockingly bizarre.
- So it's really frustrating when these token Jews step in,
act like they understand what's happening
and then kind of make it
as if we're weaponizing antisemitism.
- Oh yeah. Kind of like we're weaponizing
it completely in audience.
Like the most obvious thing in the world here.
I believe I have it in here still. Maybe not.
Let's do it right here. Tell
tell me what you think of this one.
- This is the first time I am using my full, real name, um,
to stand in solidarity with Palestinians.
And I, I don't deserve applause
because I am too late.
Um, because every single day that we don't speak out
as Jews in support of Palestinian liberation
is another day too late.
Um, I grew up in a Jewish American school system
that was explicitly Zionist.
Um, that,
- You know, it just, there's so many examples.
I mean, here's what Michael Tracy said, pro-Israel,
Columbia students on Fox news panels say political speech
she dislikes is not actual free speech.
I mean, that in and of itself is shockingly dumb.
And that her speech has been
silenced because she was scared.
Another student complains about token Jews supporting
protestors who he calls modern day Nazis.
I just doesn't, I don't even need to say anything like
that's just so incredibly crazy to me.
Now, here is how it gets represented by Republican senators.
You know, the same people that were acting like they were
being censored everywhere 30 seconds ago who are now calling
for your speech to be censored.
Look at the way Tom Cotton is acting.
I mean, it's just, it's so look, look at him.
It's like some little child who's laughing
because what they're doing is lying.
They're openly calling,
they're all Hamas supporting rapist supporters.
That's what they're doing. Same thing while calling
for your speech to be suppressed,
- They would have to do is pick up the phone
and call the president of Columbia University quietly
and say, Madam President, how you doing?
Listen, I I don't have a lot of time and I know you're busy.
You've got 14 days to get control of your campus,
or you're not getting any more federal money.
Now she will pounce on that like a ninja,
but Joe Biden hadn't done that.
President Biden is scared to death
to alienate the Hamas wing of the Democratic party.
- Great. Okay, so now, now they are Hamas wing.
Why does anybody with integrity allow these people
to make these kind of flagrant allegations?
Now look, it's who knows anything's possible,
but the idea that this, this is as dumb as them.
Like, think about how ridiculous it is for the people
that were just being called maga white supremacist Nazis
because they were Republicans was secretly white
supremacists and racist Nancy some now
doing the same thing in reverse.
The proud, the supporting Democrats. We live in a cartoon.
These people are all ridiculous
and all they're doing is getting the people within the
paradigm to keep, to grab these mantles
and keep the game going.
I believe most people see through it.
We just need to start making sure
that the rest see the fake reality
that is the pundits of the left and right.
That's what we have to do. This is in.
And look, Tom Cotton is getting a kick outta this. Why?
Because the joke here,
Orson Osky, this,
the pretend international human rights
lawyer, I showed you this the other day.
He now says the Kefi has become today's version
of the KKK hood.
I mean, it's just the stupidest thing.
The overlap being a group of white supremacist
also has very clear government ties
and a group of Palestinian protestors
or people just supporting Palestine, right?
As I said, so you mean this, just like this guy,
as you can see, I just played this clip
where you can see him right here.
Twitter's terrible if this actually plays right there.
Where Dammit, wearing the keah. Okay?
So going by his logic as he says,
it's the new version of the KKK hood.
So I said, are you calling these Holocaust survivors?
And Jews, either alongside them,
are wearing them equivalent to the KKK.
Of course, he didn't respond. 'cause he's, he's a coward
and he's pushing forward whatever
narrative works for the agenda.
But here's what somebody did say, sadly, yes,
they are collaborators.
Some, this is what people think
because this complete liar says you're supposed to think
that, right?
So now if you're a Holocaust survivor,
it's not even sacred anymore to these people.
The very people who use that same event
to justify everything are now saying,
even though you were there, you're no longer par.
You are now a racist because you said the wrong thing.
I just can't make these points anymore clear.
That shows you, it's about Zionism, not about Judaism.
Everywhere you look that's being proven to you.
Here's what Jonathan Cook said.
It would obviously be antisemitic to suggest
that threats from Jewish donors have influenced US
universities in crushing academic freedom
and the right to protest on their campuses.
Right? Of course, that'd be your racist
for suggesting such a crazy thing, right?
Meanwhile, in other news, 700 plus members
of Rutgers Jewish community have threatened
to bring the university to its knees by pulling
donations and financial support.
After Rutgers administrators had peacefully resolved their
standoff with students protesting the university's
complicity in Israel's genocide
and Gaza, the university had agreed to hold talks
with student representatives about its investments in arms,
arms firms assisting Israel's slaughtering Gaza set up
by Palestine Stute studies course mirroring the existence
Jew, uh, existing Jewish studies department
and establish a long-term collaboration
with a Palestinian university in West Bank, similar
to its relationship with Tel Aviv University in Israel.
So completely even, right?
But see the secret point is
that they think all Palestinians are terrorists,
but they're not supposed to say that because then it looks
like we're aiming at all the men.
You know, you get the point, a letter from Jewish community
leaders, however, in the, to the university accused it
of capitulating to the extreme demands of the lawless mob.
One that was supposedly inciting hatred
and violence against Jews in the Jewish state.
Nope, not even remotely.
The Israeli newspaper Harts also reports the four largest
Jewish federations in the New Jersey,
in New Jersey are demanding a state investigation into the
quote, shameful capitulation of Rutgers
to the pro Hamas encampment.
There it is, and are threatening to lobby
for a cut in state funding.
So everywhere you look right now,
whether it is apac, I mean it's everywhere.
You're seeing the influence
of Zionism in the immediate actions of powerful people,
of cult politicians, of the media
yanking funding in the minute that's ha the a a,
the APAC funding for the emergency Israel.
Bill, my point
before, that's not how lobbying is supposed to work,
even though we all know that it does.
They're using money in real time
to influence policy decisions.
And the moment they voted wrong, they yanked it.
What you're seeing here is the same thing.
They're threatening to lobby for a cut in funding so
that your university, that's, I mean, didn't you just hear
what he said right here?
Or was it, did I close it? I think I did.
But they're talking about it will threaten their
funding, yank that funding out.
Right? By the way, don't don't for the podcast,
he candidate here gets a almost, you know,
almost a cool $200,000 from Israel lobbying money.
So if you threaten their financing, well, bottom line is
that probably will force them to make action.
But if this is about coercion, how dare they listen to
what their students had to say as long as they say things
that are pro-Palestine.
Now, I just, I'm obviously taking
way longer than I wanted here.
This discussion is just simply about another manipulation.
This world breaks down about how these students
for justice in Palestine, another group
that they scream about being racist,
even though they're not, are openly talking about banning
the support of an international group
that gets manipulated into, they're trying
to ban Jewish organizations in the college.
It's constant, these manipulations
and they're lying like so many other things they lie about.
Now, here is another video we've shown you already.
This is just a, a Zionist provocation at Stanford
where the guy literally walks up
and just starts like, just,
just starts pushing people, right?
Then the cameras get turned on
and all of a sudden it's the violent pro Palestinians.
This is how this continues to work. They come to provoke.
Now, ALO recent video you might have seen going around
of some like weirdly staged video
of somebody filming a guy in a mask, beating another guy,
zero context, except she claims,
and the rest of them claim, here's the
moss beating a Palestinian.
Okay, , I don't even know why that, where
that even comes from or why that would even make sense
other than the fact that just anybody beating anybody,
like my point is it could be any two random people.
The co let's just say it is a Hamas member in a Palestinian.
What does that prove? There are two people.
Something could have happened. My point is that even
that turns out to be constant manipulation.
And she's writing, these are people's kids on
college campuses are cheering for.
No, they're not. You absolute liar.
They're trolling for stopping the genocide
and all you can do is continue
to say they're all screaming for Hamas.
It's just honestly the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.
They continue to be exposed everything they're saying.
It's like Josh calling me a Jew hater.
I just don't see how any honest person can stand back
and go, yep, that's clear .
I mean, it's just ignorant.
But my point is, as we,
and this is something pv I think PV t's pointed out before,
and I've highlighted, I think even Robert's discussed there,
and this is, this goes in overseas as well.
We just played a clip from the a DL for tending
and dressing up like Palestinians
and infiltrating other countries,
and specifically to pretend to be racist, you know,
be imams over in the world that are causing violence.
One very famously got exposed as a mosad agent.
Not hard to wrap your mind around what that means.
As he's highlighting a special occupation force unit is
actually dedicated to pretending to be Palestinians
who actively beat and kill Palestinians.
There's these are examples of that where you can see them.
Oh, they, you've all seen this one where they dressed up
and infiltrated the hospital, right?
Here's one where this guy's dressed like a Palestinian
and ends up arresting a Palestinian.
It shouldn't be that hard to see what we're talking about.
This happens all the time, right?
Here are the fake Palestinians resting the real
Palestinian with the IDF.
That's the truth that happens all the time.
Now ask yourself again whether you think this might just be
something else and why it's so filmed
and so orchestrated, like everything else they do,
but they say, do these propagandists make these fake
clips to use it for their agenda?
And he follows up going, yes, they stage these videos
pretending to be Hamas all the time.
Here's an example of it that was proven.
Uh, it's just these fake videos they make
and they put it out and it's, it's part of the havara lies.
Doesn't mean that there's not
examples of AMAs beating people.
I would never make that argument clearly since we
know that Israel funds them.
So it should be a very considered concept
that they might be always working on behalf of Israel.
That's why I constantly go like, I don't support amass.
Why would I support a group that I can prove
is getting funding from Israel?
It doesn't, it makes me worry.
There's more going on behind the scenes,
but I can still be objective
and highlight that you're lying about it too.
It makes their head spin when you, when you come out
and show them the, the overlaps
or you that you're not in the left right paradigm.
Most of these X bots online,
you can't even wrap their mind around that.
But here's an example of some lies.
This is actually pretty funny.
This is how this continues to go.
The NYPD would've lied about this without the video.
They were originally telling the press
that someone sprayed him with pepper spray.
I guess it was some, uh, uh, assistant Chief James McCarthy.
They were, they were saying he was, he got sprayed
by the pro-Palestine protesters,
except here's what actually happened.
Which is hilarious because he accidentally sprayed himself
in the face and he got caught on video.
- Hello, darkness smile friend holds out right there,
- And oops, coming. That's what
- Happened.
- Hannah don't feel that
- And that was planted
- Is how do they not know that
you're not supposed to rub your face?
I know that , I mean,
they're rubbing his other cops are rubbing his face.
How is that possible
- Restless?
- Oh, I feel so bad that he's struggling
as they're beating up and staying innocent students.
You get the
- Points.
- Now the point is that had there not been video,
they would've continued to lie and they already did.
Anyway, that's how this works.
Here is Glenn Greenwald highlighting the
one we were just discussing.
Two videos I'll show you with this.
Oh, come on, hold on. Hmm.
I guess I keep missing these for some reason. One second.
I just like his breakdown on this.
It's, you know, as the person writes in the tweet, it's kind
of cathartic just to watch him just kind
of break this down in front of them, which I,
I think is hard for them to recognize.
And he, he, he's on there with a, like a wild pro Zionist.
Let's see. Here we go. Oh, that's what I did. Hold on.
Son of a gun. Sorry guys.
I don't wanna bother you with the stuff
that's going on here on this something go.
I think it has to do with brave and string yard.
There's always, I maybe have to update the, the browser.
There's just always something going on with this thing.
It doesn't allow me to, to upload videos where I should.
I'm only saying this now because I'm in the process
of doing it and I'm wasting time.
There we go. So give it a second to load.
It says Cathartic demolition here by GR Glenn Greenwald,
who points out the hate crime hoax of the girl at Yale
who faked getting viciously stabbed in the eye.
The hoax was feverously amplified all across corporate media
who has yet to even retract or clarify the claim.
Now, this is what's so crazy about it.
I these are people that knew it was a lie
or didn't care to even check,
and now it's proven to be one that was, that's
what proved they didn't even care.
'cause it was about using it to progress the agenda
and it got, it got immediately morphed into multiple kids
with multiple sharpened checks in their eyes.
And it's, nope, none of that was true.
And I just think it's shocking that we can't acknowledge
how constantly that happens within the paradigm. So, Glenn,
- What is your, uh, sort of, where's the line for you as
to what's protected speech?
What's, uh, protected civil, disobedient
or not protected civil disobedience,
but what's sort of tolerable civil disobedience?
How do you kind of categorize, uh,
different things we've seen at these encampments? Yeah,
- I think it absolutely depends on the impact.
Obviously if you have people using violence,
and there have been so many hate crimes hoaxes about trying
to create this narrative that American Jews are this new
endangered and victimized group.
They can't even walk outside without being
violently attacked.
The one example that all over the media ended that was
promoted by Barry Weiss's free press ended up
being a complete hoax.
This Jewish student
who has been a long time pro-Israel activist, who claimed
that she was stabbed in the eye with a Palestinian flag.
And then when you watch the video,
she was standing near the protestors.
They were just marching by her waving flags.
One of the flags just brushed up against her.
She went on tv. There was nothing wrong with her eyes.
She said the only symptoms she had was
a little bit of a headache.
And yet Mike Johnson goes to the Holocaust Museum, uh,
yesterday and claims
that Jewish students plural are now having attacks on them
violently by having, by being stabbed in the eye
with Palestinian flags.
It's like a Jesse Smollett level hate crimes hoax,
but wr large to justify these aggressive crackdowns.
We just had, you know, two weeks ago, the House
of Representatives that passed a law
that wildly expanded the definition of anti-Semitism
for anti-discrimination law.
And it includes a wide range of views
that obviously are constitutionally protected, such
as saying you think Israeli crimes
and war are similar to what the Nazis did, to suggest
that certain people, evangelicals
or American Jews who are inculcated from birth
with worshiping Israel
and being devoted to it, have a greater allegiance
to Israel if it's in conflict with the United States to even
criticizing Israel in a way
that is supposedly a double standard,
meaning you criticize Israel more harshly than you do.
These are now rendered illegal under
anti-discrimination law.
Such a full frontal assault on basic free speech rights.
In addition to all the other examples that I cited,
and I think the most important thing here when we're talking
about standards is, you know,
I think human being need, need to be humble.
We are not consistency machines, of course.
We're gonna be more inclined to support crackdowns on
and censorship of the views that we most hate.
And again, Ilya, who is a free speech champion in a lot
of contacts, is somebody
who is a fanatical devotee to Israel.
He really believes that Israel has
to be protected and defended.
And I think he should be more humble about asking himself
whether or not he's applying standards inconsistently,
because the people who's silencing he's supporting happen
to be people whose views he most hates.
I don't think there's another cause
that offends him more than this one,
namely criticizing Israel or calling for the end of Zionism.
And just to point out one example that, I mean, I, you know,
referenced earlier a study, not social media anecdotes,
but a study that said 99% of campus encampments
and protests have been entirely nonviolent.
One of the examples of violence be
beyond the UCLA one was a video that surfaced yesterday
where a former IDF soldier
and a, uh, professor at the University
of Arizona physically menace Muslim women by being,
using a posture of wanting to fight,
getting an inch away from them, having
that body posture like you're ready to hit them,
the muscle moment were covering their faces.
It was very difficult to watch.
That was one of the gravest acts
of actual physical intimidation
and force that I've seen in any of these incidents.
Ilya went onto Twitter
and said the following quote,
A postdoctoral researcher at Arizona State lost his temper
after being provoked at a pro-Israel rally over the weekend.
So blaming these Muslim women who were physically,
uh, threatened and menace.
He said it wasn't a good look,
but hardly a capital offense with some similarities
to my poorly phrased tweet.
And then it went on to defend the idea that this pro, that,
that, that, that, that this pro pre professor Jonathan
Gelman, who was really the one who used physical menacing,
should not even lose his job.
Now if the situation were reversed
and these were Muslim men physically menacing Jewish women
in this way, I strongly believe that Ilya
and many other people would be calling that a terrorist act
and demanding their imprisonment and deportation.
And so I think a hundred percent it is.
I I don't think it's a matter of corruption.
I just think there are a lot of people
who are indoctrinated from birth
and bombarded with propaganda.
I know this because I was one of them.
I grew up in American Jewish culture who are taught to
defend and have loyalty to an affection for Israel
above almost any other cause.
And the idea that someone's gonna be so certain
that the reason they generally support free speech,
and yet in this case aren't bothered by
that congressional law aren't bothered by DeSantis,
is shutting down, uh,
pro-Palestinian groups on the really noxious theory
that now material supportive terrorism doesn't mean raising
funds for terrorist groups or arming them,
but it just means speech.
Speech that supposedly advances their anti-Israel cause a
gray violation of the First Amendment.
The reason why there's this obvious shifting of standards,
even of sentiments is
because the people on the right largely revere Israel
and have as one of their central causes
defending Israel from criticism.
And that's why they're so offended by this protest movement.
- Good for him. Now, one thing I wanna point out, I mean, I,
I've got plenty of criticisms in the past
or even currently of different things that,
that Glen might say or has recovered right, or has covered,
but I wanna point out how important it's to me
to see somebody, because there was a, there earl a while ago
before a lot of stuff, he kind of got a lot of promotion
for sort of being a lefty that was siting with the right,
in regard to the same, this is my point.
In this case, at the very least, I, I love the fact
that he's showing himself to be principled,
consistent in his logic that he's over here on the right
before, just like I was going, yes, the trucker protests
that are shutting him down is disgusting.
They're, they're broadly stroking entire group
because of one claim of a flag, you know, whatever,
that they shouldn't, it's financial censorship.
And he got a lot of promotion from that because,
and rightly so, because people are going, see,
here's the lefty who can see that we're being suppressed.
And now here he is doing the same thing just like I am about
the other side going here.
They are the right is now blindly supporting censor.
Not all of them, obviously the same point.
There's nuance, but pointing out the ones that are I,
I ha you have to respect that clearly
because that shows you that he's not bound by one politic.
The people that are ignoring it are the people
that are either choosing to be,
or rather don't really believe in the things they claim
to do believe in, or choosing to ignore them
for a current benefit.
You can support that if you want.
I find that to be disgusting.
I find it to be the worst thing in the political
conversation we're dealing with because, and not just
because right now you're allowing genocide, but
because that allows the problems in every way
to continue for your benefit.
So I just wanna give him a good shout out
because I think what Glen said right there was spot on
and it, it, it's, I mean I love that he's even saying it
because he has a special kind of niche to be able
to say these things that people, for whatever,
I don't know whether it's because he's a gay person or
because he's a lefty, I don't even know what it is.
But for some reason he gets through
with these things a lot better than certain people
as a great, because it will reach people right there
that will get through to people
and everything he said is true.
So I'm sure Josh will call him a Jew hater as well,
because it's the same exact things that we're saying.
The point though is to go to the other, uh, the clip about
that fake hoax he's discussing, you know, even that, just
to call it hoax pe Even then people are calling him a racist
for saying that you're an anti semi,
but it's, of course, if I were to say that it's even worse
or certain people, it's, you're not even allowed to and,
and you go back a year ago
or even further, you might get blacklisted from the world
for making those kind of statements.
That's how crazy things have shifted.
But this is a great clip made by Matt Orla
about not just the lie of that fake, obviously the fake,
the story of bear being stabbed in the eye,
but the way that not just the media,
but the political establishment just grabbed onto this
like we were just discussing.
So I just really hope this reflects for people
that may be new to this, to see how deep this goes.
And it's not just about Israel
or anything, it's just about
anything that they see as a benefit.
They will sell you on everything you believe in to get
what they need from you.
That's politics for you.
That's government, that's media, that's what they're doing.
Shout out to Matt Oral. This is a great clip.
- Israel protests turning violent.
Our next guest saying quote,
I was stabbed in the eye, stabbed
- For Beanie Jew. There's a video on
- My Twitter dive.
We'll not stop, we'll not rest his clothes.
See, I can't move forward. We'll stop.
We'll not his clothes. We'll not stop.
We will not rest his clothes.
We'll, not, not
dive, dive.
Stop. Not his.
You're stuck. No, a a
- Complete embellishment.
One Jewish student at Yale was stabbed in the eye
with a Palestinian flag
- Stabbing students in the eye with flags stabbed in the,
- The earliest examples were just stating that it's, it,
it got embellished since then.
Right? But right there, at
what point does the average person recognize
that these are people on supposed to be journalists
that didn't even do?
I mean, look, it's not like they got pla
If you look at the video, the only piece of actual evidence,
it's self evident.
It was obviously not what happened.
So that means they either didn't like, like
that first clip we talked about,
they either didn't even look and just did it
because it was suiting their interests, or they did
and they realized it was fake and decided to do it anyway.
I just really hope people can recognize what that means.
That might be on the fence about the two party illusion.
And it's not just the right guys
left and right, it's all of it.
It's your government. It's the media.
We're being lied to the eye
- With the Palestinian flag. They're
- Saying that her eye had been messed up, that
- She was assaulted, stabbed in the eye
with an anti-Israel protester's flag,
- A demonstrator jammed a Palestinian
flag into her left eye,
- Jabbed in the eye with a Palestinian flag
- Stabbed in the eye with a Palestinian flag
- ELs investigating the attack, having
- Her eye stabbed with a Palestinian flag.
Yes. So there's a lot of violence going on.
- Injuring our guest,
- Poked in the eye with a flag pole and hospitalized.
- You had to receive hospital treatment
for your injury. It's
- A heart, heart attack.
Needed hospital treatment for that injury.
- What is the next, how did they talk to her
with a straight face being like the day
after going put your
eye doesn't look like it's hurt.
Magic of, of, of plastic surgery.
I mean, what do you think we're gonna,
how embarrassing I drove your injury.
- I could just feel the pressure of what happened
and like, I have a headache.
Um,
- Oh boy.
Shar Tack says she was assaulted for wearing Jewish attire.
- Quite obvious. I wear, I wear modest dress
and I have a star, David, and quite obvious.
And they identified us pretty much immediately. Then what
- Happened?
There's a video on my Twitter of students passing
by me in a circle as they encircled me in a circle.
As they encircled me, they started taunting me
and giving me their middle singer.
Oh my God. And they all won
after the other taunted me all one after the other.
- Taunted me, taunted me this closed dive.
- It would need to make this up guys.
If this, if this is what consumed the media,
then the whole thing is not what they're telling you.
It's as simple as that. Okay?
- It was not just like one of them taunted me.
They all taunted me one
after the other, waving things in my face.
Yeah. And then discriminated in a physical assault. Okay.
- You have people getting stabbed in the eye,
- Jabbed in the eye with a Palestinian flag. So the
- FBI should be looking very closely at
- This.
This is not some inert protest movement. It is menacing.
- A Jewish Yale University student says
that she was attacked during an anti-Israel protest.
Meanwhile, the IDF launched a deadly series of airstrikes.
- This - Doctor works efficiently
to help the baby girl breathe.
Her lungs not yet fully developed.
Her mother was six months pregnant when she was killed in an
Israeli airstrike.
- The point there is that's what they're all ignoring while
they make up a fake story about a girl being stabbed in the
eye, ignoring the bombing of children, the saving
of a child from a pregnant woman
that got killed by the bombing.
None of that matters, of course.
Let's go back to the fake story.
- At least 22 people, including 18 children, are dead
after an Israeli strike.
On Rafa Saturday night,
Israel has conducted daily air raids on the Gaza city,
where most of the population has taken refuge.
The first strike killed a 3-year-old and their parents.
The second strike killed two women
and 17 children at Yale University.
A student says a protestor attacked her
- Again.
A student assaulted me by jabbing me in the eye.
Oh my goodness. These protests are crafted
to create incidents of violence.
The girl will step in the eye, put down
- The protests, - They create an environment of violence,
- Environments of violence
and assault for Jewish students. One
- Jewish student says that the rally actually led her
to being assaulted. The,
- This whole narrative of the, the, the culture
of violence in the air of anger like that just permeated.
And a lot of honest people that don't care to look,
that decide to trust the media.
Watched a certain show, looked at Fox News,
looked at a headline on their phone,
and then just knew that anti-Semitism was everywhere.
And that's when you get Joe Rogan show.
That's when you get those kind of things where they just,
they repeat these statements
because they looked through that lens
and saw the things they're pointing
to without realizing even the things
they were pointing to behind.
It was not even really what it was.
But sure if you stood back
and squinted just right, it's everywhere.
- Students running these rallies caused the other 500 people
in the rally to behave towards me
with hostility and violence.
Violence. They taunted me
and waved their middle finger in my face, violent,
and they throw up peace, signs,
- Peace.
- It seems quite traumatizing.
- And the rallies are conducive to violence.
It's all about violence. It's all about
having a student assault. Another student,
- , a Jewish girl,
was stabbed in the eye. Palestinian
- Flag.
A kid stabbed in the eye,
stabbed in the eye, stabbed in the eye.
- Protests are growing more and more
- Violent.
Now you are seeing actual violence. Oh,
- A Jewish student was stabbed in the eye
with a Palestinian flag
- Attacking a kid
and stabbing a Jewish student in the eye
with a pull protestor waved a Palestinian
flag near her face, her
- Face.
And the students at the protest were literally
around me dancing in a circle and singing
and molding hands, singing anti-Jewish like,
uh, I guess Chad,
- I ain't gonna study more.
No more ain't gonna study more. No more.
I study more, no more.
- You know, we're looking at these scenes and,
and prominent in many of them in this, these, uh,
videos are watermelons.
If you could explain the meaning of that to us.
- Sure. So we've seen the watermelon all over campus.
It's supposed to be a symbol basically
against the Jewish people. A
- Oh - God, .
They're not, these aren't, obviously,
I don't need to say they're not journalists.
What kind of a, it's the colors of the Palestinian flag.
It's because they changed it on,
which I didn't know when I first saw it, I asked, remember.
And it's, I looked into it and turns out it's obvious.
The idea is that they were trying to not get censored
because people with Palestinian flags were getting censored.
So they use the watermelon, right?
The idea is anything Palestine equals Jew hatred to people
that are completely lost in this conversation.
- A symbol basically against the Jewish people.
Like all the other symbols
that these students are using in favor
of violent terroristic acts against Jews.
- I'm really shy. This is actually just
- Like, this is really, it's really painful to realize
that your peers, um, have joined the Nazi party.
- Nazis for the podcast are showing all the
Jewish people that are standing there.
Part of the whole thing like this does kind of give me,
it's scary a little bit.
Like just because it's such a prominent thing
and that it's so easy to see how mobs,
and I'm talking about the people that are blindly believing
that the protestors are the mob can get motivated,
can get mobilized by the powerful entities of the world.
And it's dangerous. This is, they're, they're the ones
that they will then rationalize the violence, right?
Like we're talking about with the BML protest,
where suddenly it becomes, it's, oh,
they're all okay because we're on the side.
That's what we're talking about.
Now suddenly you get the acts
of violence against their protest,
like shooting fireworks at them.
We're actually hitting them or attacking them
with planks of wood or whatever else.
And that gets completely disregarded.
That's what I'm talking about. But
that's an early small example.
What happens when somebody shoots somebody?
What happens when, and by the way, that's already happened.
Some child, a Palestinian child got stabbed like seven times
or something, right in the beginning of this.
Now the argument was, it was
because, well, I think the clear motivation was that it was
because they thought they were Palestinian terrorists,
but whether or not it had directly to do with the gods
of genocide, it's rough for you to decide.
But my point is that what happens when
that continues to get ignored?
What happens when that gets dangerously mobilized like
they're trying to do, trying
to divide this country down the center?
So we cannot mobilize against our
completely illegitimate government
- Rallies are guided by, um,
terror terrorists across the sea.
That's where they're getting a lot of their methods,
terrorists, that's where they're getting a lot of their
- Methods.
Some of 'em also laughed at me. Horror. Horror.
- Um, thank you for your bravery.
I can't imagine the fear that the evil that you have seen.
How are you holding up today?
- Thank God I got really lucky that the end
of the student's flag was not sharp.
And so it was a blunt force injury. What
- Is the nature of your injury?
- I could just feel the pressure of what happened
and like, I have a headache.
Um, I have a headache. God,
- Good job, Matt.
God, it's, you know, it's, it's, it's worthy of ridicule.
It's, it's, we should be laughing at how crazy it is.
Unfortunately, if it wasn't
so obviously being used justify violence.
Now, Senator Mike Johnson, in an example of
how completely captured these people are,
and by the way, no matter anything that I'm ever saying,
like mobilizing or whatever type never means violence
as much as they'll always try to make that argument.
That's why they're trying to turn words into violence.
Because people like us
who are simply having conversations about
what we should be aware of, terrifies them.
That I, I I think violence begets violence.
I do not think that's the answer,
but you can make up your own decisions.
But I think what's important is to recognize
that per the Constitution,
the American people literally have the right to abolish
or alter their government, but not,
that's what terrifies them.
And I'm saying that the reality is that they're trying
to keep you so divided that you don't have the power
of the majority.
Never. But he says, I called, this is Mike Johnson.
I called Netanyahu to ask him what
to do After Biden stopped arms to arms to Israel,
Mike Johnson said he was so surprised Biden dared
to defy Israel that he called Netanyahu
to ask him if it was true to talk about what to do next.
The speaker of the house says, Hey, hey,
foreign government leader, what should we do now?
Does that seem normal?
And then of course, the impeachment talks began,
which is exactly what happened.
Boom. Just like that. Oh, this is the wrong one actually.
It's right here. Articles
of impeachment filed against Biden over withholding,
withholding arms to Israel.
Now you've got members. I always have
to make sure I'm actually, it looks like I'm not following
them, but I'm pretty sure I am.
When you actually go to the account,
Twitter is always this wonky.
There we go. Oh, did disappear.
Something about the, I think on a side note for the podcast
there, see, it went away.
You see that something tells me this means something.
It like, so to me, I am following this account.
I clearly am. 'cause it shows that when it starts, see,
watch right there following,
but then it glitches and it, it'll go away.
Just a second ago. Nope, it's stayed this time.
Something tells me there's, I i,
there's something to that in my opinion.
Something about that.
Sorry to go off on a side note,
but something about that suggests to me that that's,
we're getting a quick insight into some kind of channeling,
some kind of manipulation of what we're supposed
to see versus what we're not just my personal opinion,
but article of impeachment
because he's withholding arms, which
by the way isn't even happening.
It was a single shipment
that was withheld while they researched the rest of them.
So they were still, and they are still,
and even then, if they stopped all of those,
there's a thousand ways that they will
and continue to send weapons to whoever they want.
Especially when they don't want you to know they've got more
of those than normal, in my opinion.
So in any case, all this is,
is an illusion about fighting to remove Biden.
So we continue the genocide.
It's shocking and realizing that Mike,
speaker Johnson called Netanyahu
to say, Hey, what should we do?
Oh, get rid of Biden. Okay, got it. Thanks for the money.
Well, here's a great clip from Anomaly, well,
technically from apac.
And he simply makes the point.
This is a video that was put out by APAC about how they
fund, read, give money to every one
of the politicians regardless of their side.
Yeah. Isn't that what we're all talking about?
And that's what he said, if you made this video,
if I did, he did.
And we said, here is every politician.
And here is how every one of them gets money from apac.
And I didn't say anything else.
You know exactly what they would say.
You're a racist. That's an antisemitic trope.
That's what he says. And I agree, he says,
but APAC posted it themselves to explain
how they've lobbied every major politician to read history.
, you just can't make this up.
You've seen this by the way. ,
- Please welcome Senate Democratic Leader,
the Senate Republican leader.
- Please welcome speaker of the US House of Representatives.
- Please welcome Secretary of State.
- I'm honored to introduce the Vice
President of the United States.
- Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States.
- Please welcome back to the Apex Stage,
the prime Minister of Israel
- From day one, Israel found in a unique alliance,
- The alliance between Israel
and the United States of America. In
- The United States.
Our support for Israel is bipartisan
and that is how it should stay.
- Our strategic ally, our unbreakable friendship,
- America is safer when we stand with
- Israel.
You get the point that every single
one all the time everywhere, right?
But totally not a big deal.
But if we say it exactly like that,
they fund every politician.
You're racist. But also let not forget that net.
Donald Trump in an interview just said that
before, you know, 10, 20 years ago,
Israel controlled the US Congress.
And he literally then said, rightly so,
it is not a fake story.
It is 100% true.
And then he goes on to say,
the reason it's not now is because of Biden.
So read that. That means when he goes back into power,
which is what's going to happen,
that he will then make sure they have control over Congress
again, because rightly so.
And yet that just got completely ignored
by most every Republican other than the ones
that seem to care about the truth.
But because he is withholding arms, even though
that's not happening, we're going to impeach Biden.
That's what, that's what's they're trying to do anyway,
at least as the illusion.
But here's what Lindsey Graham had to say, president Trump,
you're dead right to say Israel's a right to defend itself.
Keep it up, right?
So in the midst of all of this,
while we're watching people like whether you want
to call it genocide or not,
undeniable crimes being committed, at the very least,
whether you think it's even justified, lots of lots
and lots of women and children being killed.
And your argument, your statement is
you have a right to defend yourself.
Again, a moot point.
Because literally everybody everywhere in most contexts have
a right to defend themselves, except in this case,
Israel's the occupier.
And that means, in this case, legally as the UN
and plenty of other Urs have pointed out,
they do not have a right to defend themselves.
Not in the context of the illegal occupier
and not under the context of a belligerent occupier,
because they're not helping on taking
care of the population.
Every angle of this literally via international law.
They do not have a right to do what they're doing.
There's a reason so many ways has been
exposed that they are committing crimes.
But even that aside, your point is to say
after seven months, they have a right
to defend themselves and ignore everything.
I mean, this shows you everything.
Trump VULs support for Israel's quote, right?
To win its war on terror.
Oh my God, we're right back in the war on terror.
It just never ends. But I hope people,
especially Republicans are beginning to see through this.
But here's what Lindsey Graham had
to say, which is terrifying to me.
This person is a special kind
of evil.
That's the right word. I mean, look, you could argue
that he's just so compromised in a lot of different ways
that this is what he's saying.
I mean, or he is playing a role in that same way.
But my God, just saying this could trigger
worldwide consequences.
If you imagine if Russia or China
or anybody, anyone, they don't like, stood up
and said, we should drop nuclear weapons on
Washington guys.
They would act based on that. That's my exact point.
Lindsey Graham openly suggest dropping nuclear weapons,
nuclear weapons on Iran and Hamas.
I know how to pronounce it. I was just
accentuating the word .
The point is that that is terrifying to me,
whether he means it or not.
And guess what his logic is.
Just like he was pressing in Congress in a really
clumsy and ignorant way.
He said it was okay. We did it to Japan.
No, it was not okay. When we did, you did it to Japan.
We now know the reality
that Japan was retreating on every front
and the US government decided to bomb them anyway.
Murdering untold amount
of civilians destroying two entire civilian cities.
That's okay to you.
I mean, think about how terrifying it is these trying
to pretend that was okay in order
to even suggest to do it again.
Where in Iran full of civilians and in
and in Gaza, which by the way
has at least 600 Americans,
which doesn't mean anything more than any other
human beings that live there.
But from an American politician's perspective,
you're literally calling
or at least suggesting to drop a nuclear weapon
where there are 600 Americans.
And, and that's not even including the American
Israelis that are there as well.
Doesn't that terrify you?
- Listen, you know, here's what I would say
about fighting an enemy who wants
to kill you and your family.
Why do we drop two bombs, nuclear bombs on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki to end a war that we couldn't afford to lose?
- Nope. A hundred percent a lie.
And, and quite frankly, he knows
that this is clearly something
that's been planted in his mind,
I think from an Israeli propaganda perspective,
or he's been putting this out
every time he's talking to anybody.
Do you, do you, would you do it again if you were there,
like trying to get this in the zeitgeist,
in the consciousness of the conversation, the lie
that it was okay or supposed to happen,
or it was saving the war?
None of that is true and it's very easy to prove. You
- Don't understand, apparently what Israel is facing.
They're facing three groups, Iran,
who has received $80 billion in aid,
- Fake news.
What he is talking about is the money
that was stolen from Iran that was then given back to them.
So even then is easy to prove.
But the the is, this is my point about easily proven
realities that they just continue to lie to lie about.
He'll probably talk about the
girl getting stabbed in the eye with a flag.
You know, that kind of ongoing and never ending lie.
Mention how Assad was gassing children
or whatever other narrative they spin
that we can prove is not true.
- When Trump left office,
they were exporting 300 barrels of oil a day.
Now they're at 1.3, uh, million a day.
They've been enriched by Biden. They're taking,
- Right?
So what he's talking about is we should be suppressing the
entire country of Iran, which means collective punishment
because we don't like what they say.
Like, isn't that crazy to think about?
This is the kind of person we're talking about.
The game is we we're fighting for the civilians
as everything you do hurts the civilians.
Isn't that just, it's the same thing happening in Gaza.
That's my, I'm trying to show this to people
that it's been going on the us everything the US does in
foreign policy is the same dynamic collecting,
bombing everybody in Iraq and killing all the civilians.
It's the same damn thing. That's why
Israel keeps trying to do that.
You didn't care when it was Iraq.
Well, yeah, we actually did.
And by pointing to another atrocity to say, yours is not
as bad, doesn't really make the point. You think it does
- That money to kill all the
- Jews, even though it's worse, by the way,
- Jews.
So when we were faced taking that money
to kill all the Jews,
- So now apparently you gave 'em
$80 million to kill all the Jews.
Where does that even come from? It's not true.
- So when we were faced with destruction as a nation
after Pearl Harbor fighting the Germans
and the Japanese, we decided to end the war by the bombing,
uh, Hiroshima.
Nagasaki with nuclear weapons. That was the right decision.
Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war.
They can't afford to lose
and work with them to minimize casualties.
- So given the weapons they're using to murder children,
even Biden and even the state,
even the people in the US government have acknowledged,
yes, they're breaking the law.
He doesn't care. Like I bet you he would even be willing
to say that on the record.
This guy's a lunatic.
It doesn't matter if they're breaking
the law. We support Israel
- Senator.
That military officials would argue that there has been
so much technology since those bombs were dropped, that for
that very reason, that is why Israel
and other developed countries can be more
precise. But let me ask
- You see him shaking his head, he doesn't like that idea.
No, no, no. We can't try not to kill civilians.
We have to bomb them with big bombs.
- Ask it this way because President Biden is not the first
president to use armed shipments to try
to influence Israeli policy.
As you know, former president Ronald Reagan on multiple
occasions withheld weapons
to impact Israel's military actions.
Did President Reagan show that using US military aid
as leverage can actually be an effective way to
reign in and impact Israel's policy?
- When you're telling the world you're gonna restrict
weapons delivery to the Jewish state
who is fighting a th three front war for their survival.
It emboldens Iran, it emboldens Hamas.
Swar is probably juiced up on the idea.
There's daylight between the United States and Israel.
The hostage deal is harder.
This is the worst decision, uh, in the
- The hostage deal, which they refused.
And the idea of the guy that they're literally protecting
and funding and supporting and Qatar, right?
And it is live because I'm
clearly been responding to the comments.
But you know, it doesn't matter what,
does it matter if the show is live or not?
It's the same information. Keep paying attention, history
- Of the us uh, a relationship
to deny weapons at a time the Jewish
state could be destroyed.
So here's what I would say.
There is some hope we can get over this non-negotiable
to destruction of Hamas.
Nobody in Israel will allow Hamas
to be standing militarily or politically.
- No, no. What you mean is specifically Netanyahu's
desperate to make up the claim when most people in,
in the government, or excuse me,
in Israel at the very least, who also likely want
that outcome right now, do not want you to continue.
So he's just lying about this to push it on a US audience.
But in any sense, even Harts
and even people in the military, people within the society,
people in the government have made it clear,
her rats covered this and made it a very clear statement.
They do not feel they can remove Hamas.
That's something that their own IDF have emitted.
That's not possible. So what are we talking about?
Why is he pushing these lies to continue to justify?
Netanya was genocide. That's what's happening
- When this is over.
How we get there is subject to negotiation.
My problem is not with the weapons that Israel is using.
My problem is with the tactics that Hamas is using
and the idea that America would not send a nickel
of aid echoed
by United States Senator when all the Jews are, are trying
to be killed by radical Islamic groups
- When all the Jews are trying to be killed.
. This guy, this guy is a clown.
I mean, he, he can't even, he's just not even
saying the points right?
As long as you just say Jews
and kill in danger, whatever they're trying to be killed.
I don't think you meant that the right way.
I mean, this is just so embarrassing.
The bottom line is justifying the idea of bombing
with nuclear weapons
where people are starving to death.
Where you haven't seen a single example of a Hamas member.
But here's what I said. What about over 600 Americans in
Gaza, which NPR covered,
which I've made a point many times since the beginning
of this, which they still don't care about.
Are you just removing the mask, showing everyone
that in your belligerent need
or maybe an obligation to defend Israel at the expense
of Americans that you're even willing to support the killing
of Americans themselves?
That's pretty terrifying. That's what he's talking about.
They just don't wanna acknowledge that's the reality.
'cause they actually don't think they're Americans
because they're also Palestinians.
Now also recognize guys, these aren't pa all Palestinians
who also happen to be Americans.
Many of them as there's an entire
documentary about are Americans who have married somebody
who have family there, who also have, who either gained it
or ga uh, by applying
or gained it through marriage citizenship like Robert,
for example, or other people that are from Britain
or anywhere else in the world who have married somebody.
The point is that there are a, again,
not like this should matter anymore.
Human life is human life,
but to an American politician,
there are actual American citizens who are born in America
who are trapped in Gaza.
There was a whole video done about one woman in the
hospital, and he's talking about bombing everybody.
These people, they don't care about anything
but their dedication to Zionism, in my opinion.
I don't know how else you read that.
Here's the evaas showing you the same point.
She says, who are, who are the five Americans still being
held by terrorists in Gaza?
Many of which, by the way, this,
I'm pretty sure this person was just killed by IDF bombings.
They don't care though. It's all about
narratives and continuing the lie.
The point is, I said, interesting how you never seem
to call attention to the Palestinian Americans trapped under
constant Bob, Barb and starvation, torture
and threat of execution in Gaza.
It's almost like you feel their lives don't
matter if they're Palestinian.
Hmm, exactly. Or here's rep. Here's a US congressman.
Hey, there are six American hostages held in Gaza.
That's what he's saying.
The strong American first president would do
everything to secure their freedom.
A strong president would care more about bringing them home
than appeasing spoiled college students.
You mean Americans with rights
to free speech that you don't care about?
Yep. Joe Biden is an American last president. Oh, okay.
I said, well, what about the over 600 Palestinian
Americans trapped in Gaza?
Do their lives not matter?
Why do you only care about Israeli Americans?
I guess Americans only get your allegiance if they also
support your Zionist benefactor Brian, representative ma
or representative Brian Mast is Israel first.
How else do you read that? You only care about the
Israeli Americans.
There are 600 Americans in Gaza,
but you're only talking about the six.
There's an obvious overlap there. Call 'em out for that.
There, there's nothing racist about highlighting
that this person is actively acting in the interest
of a foreign government, whether it is Britain or Israel
or anybody else here.
Same point in it's same discussion about Americans
and the, the, the allowance of Americans being killed
by Israel as long as they're overlap with Palestine.
Remember Rine Abu Cle murdered by Israel,
lied about over and over and over
and the US government help them cover it up.
Sayer Kat asked about this. Why?
Because they keep stressing that they're gonna follow up.
We're gonna investigate, they're gonna follow up, right?
Well, this was two years ago. Guess what they haven't done?
Follow it up
- Your attention to, uh, you know, uh,
two days from today, May 11th.
Uh, we'll mark the second anniversary since, uh,
an Israeli sniper killed our colleague, Sina Bach,
the Palestinian American, uh, journalist.
And I want to ask you, are you satisfied that everything
that could have been done to bring those, uh, responsible,
uh, to hold them accountable has been done?
And do you con consider that case to be closed?
- Uh, that death continues to be a tragedy.
Um, one that was investigated by the Israeli government, one
that, uh, that we investigated.
And, um, I don't have anything further to add to
what we said, what we said asked.
- So, so the case is closed.
- I I I just don't have anything further
to say on what we said many times. Yeah,
- So I won't say it's closed
because that will make me look bad.
So I don't have anything else to add.
Well, how do you think that looks? Is it closed or not?
Are you, are you satisfied with the flimsy investigation?
They got kind caught lying six times in a row.
I have nothing else to add. Yeah,
rules based international order all the way, buddy.
Good job. You're so bad at this job.
Not really, actually, I'm just saying he's one
of the betters when it comes to what they do, quite frankly.
But when you're in a position,
when you're lying about literally everything, I just dunno
how anybody can make their way outta that.
And I said, this is how Matt Miller stands up
for Americans when
openly executed by these Israeli government.
Now, we covered this many times.
Article Robert wrote about this probably three
or four times in this case,
the Nove September 10th, 2022 article,
Israel covered up the murder of Srin Abbu Clay with us help.
It's an undeniable reality.
The shot, they, and this is one of the worst examples
where they literally came out with batons
and were beating the legs of the people carrying her coffin.
It's all on video. There's no explanation for it. Nope.
People ignored it
because that's just pure hatred, is what that is.
Now, Ryan Grim is asking Patel here,
or Patel Amer basically about how there are doctors
who just got into Gaza
who are already suffering from dehydration
and have to be on an IV drip.
Now imagine for the
Palestinians that have been there for seven months,
- Citizens, doctors who are at the European hospital in
kunis facing dehydration, at least one
of them is on an IV drip.
Now is, uh, our understanding is
that relatives have been in touch with the, uh,
state Department, US administration.
Is there anything you can say about efforts to,
to get them out and was the un vehicle that was on the way
to the European Hospital part of those efforts?
- So, um, uh, let me start with the second part.
I'm not, uh, sure of the, the operational
and logistical specifics of what was in involved in,
in those specific efforts or not,
but I, I can say is that we're, oh, aware of these, uh,
reports of US citizens, doctors
and medical professionals currently unable to leave Gaza.
Um, as I've said
before, we don't control this border crossing.
And this is a, uh, incredibly complex situation, um,
that has very serious implications for the safety
and security of US citizens.
But, uh, we're continuing to work around the clock
with the government of Israel, with the government of Egypt,
uh, to work on this issue, not just, uh,
to address the very serious humanitarian assistance
concerns that I just talked about. But as Paul
- Israel's responsibility - Pointed out, um, and I've
and Matt have addressed before, Rafa is a conduit
for the safe departure of foreign nationals, um,
- Which they're blocking, which
- Continue to want to see it get opened as swiftly
as possible, which they're blocking. What
- Does it say about conditions more generally in Rafa
and in Rothen, in, in Kunis if
American doctors only arrived there recently are, are,
are already suffering from dehydration and malnutrition.
- So look, um, we have not been unambiguous about the
humanitarian situation in Gaza. It is, yeah, you
- Have a crisis for seven months. You
- Have, um, uh, no amount
of humanitarian aid at this po moment is enough.
We need to be doing everything we can
to get more, to get more humanitarian. You heard
- That - Aid, uh, food, medicine, water,
other appropriate supplies in tag Gaza.
And that is why you have seen this administration champion
really in, in all of the above approach when it comes
to humanitarian aid.
We have been what a coward, engaging directly
with partners in the region to ensure
that every crossing possible that can, uh, allow
for the access of trucks
and other things is able to make its way into Gaza.
You have seen that's seen us undertake
airdrops. Uh, you've seen
- Our partners that killed people. Jordan
- Undertake airdrops and, uh, will continuing to press and,
and hope that, uh, this maritime corridor, um,
is a, is a conduit.
And we believe that will be the case very
soon as well. Nope.
- I can guarantee it won't because Israel's involved with,
with processing, which we're gonna see right now
what they're, how they're doing with that
and the fact that the, they showed up with occupation
that it's Israel's plan, that they have no interest in doing
anything with that peer other than more occupation.
And the only reason you even need to claim that's necessary,
even though it won't be used for that, is
because Israel's blocking aid everywhere else.
It's just such an infuriating lie
to pretend like you're somehow championing the effort
to do this while you've allowed it
for seven months while you're still giving them arms to kill
with the people that you claim you're trying to help these,
it's just, it's overwhelmingly disgusting
that they stand there and act like honorable people while
they're facilitating the worst genocide we've ever seen.
This is overwhelming. And here's what they're doing.
Israeli settlers destroying desperately needed humanitarian
aid coming from Jordan.
Zachary Foster highlights.
What kind of person says to themselves, how much food
and water can I prevent from getting to people starving
to death and to in, in Gaza?
The point is so too are the hostages
they claim they're fighting for.
So too are the doctors who are there that need these things
who are not Palestinian, right?
All the doctors we just highlighted, the ones
that are just there that are needing IV drips.
What happens when Lindsey Graham wants to bomb the area?
Like it's just overwhelming.
How clear that this is not just about going after Hamas.
If you're talking about nuclear weapons,
how do you even pretend you're only going
after Hamas Here, Dr.
Uh, Len Veritas highlights more
of the same damning clip of Gaza Aid.
Convoy attacked, shows them stomping on
food, throwing it in the ground.
This is what Israel's supporting.
They repeatedly have praised what they're doing.
Mossad has, so is the IDF, so is the state
of Israel's main account on Twitter.
They're highlighting this and they're praising it.
Thank you. We all are all Palestine for highlighting this.
And don't forget, they are putting rocks in the way they're
doing everything they can to stop it.
And Elon Levy says, Egypt is refusing to let re through.
You know why? Because Israel has occupied the crossing
and taken over control when it was supposed to be both.
It's not just Israel's control.
Now what's happening is Egypt is recognizing
that they're expanding even into Egypt areas.
And even on top of that, the point is they're in tra in
control of the Kareem Shalom crossing.
And now as they get attacked for getting ready
to stage their invasion into Rafa,
as we've shown you three times already, they continue to lie
and claim they're bombing aid.
They are not, and everybody's called this out,
but she says, with support of the Israeli regime,
they're blocking every access point to them anyway.
Now, here, I'll come back to that one a second actually.
Here is what one of these Israeli settlers is talking about.
Now she's here and she's saying today at noon, what did,
we did what we could to actually stop
these settlers from destroying food that was supposed
to feed tens of thousands in gods.
So somebody with, with a, with a soul somebody
with actual compassion for human life.
And she says, and for a moment it seemed we succeeded,
but there were only two of us.
Next time we'll reach hundreds.
So there are, there's now an effort of Israelis to go out
and stop these settlers from destroying the food.
Think about that. And she follows up and she says,
and this is my point showing you guys, by the way,
that this is, they, they're, you could,
you could maybe argue it's about making sure that food gets
to their families that are still there.
That's certainly possible.
But it just seems to me that she's talking about
just food getting to Gaza.
So just recognize that it's not all Israelis
or all Jews, no matter what people are saying,
it's clearly a majority of people
that are wanting to allow this.
But it's not everybody.
And she says, I don't care about the
blue marks and scratches.
I believe that means like they're, she, they were attacked
'cause she said, she said she slapped
or about the ringing slap that one of the settlers gave me.
So realize this is a Jewish woman
and these Jewish settlers attacked her
because she just wasn't on the same side.
That's Zionism, not Judaism guys.
She, I never imagined that I would see a lot
of people throwing on the floor food intended
for hungry people from childhood.
And even today, if I was a piece
of bread falls on the floor, I'd pick it up and kiss it.
That's how I was raised. Very interesting.
Now again, the crossing, right?
Recognizing the idea of why is Egypt not allowing it?
Well, it doesn't, it's too late, man.
Because the reality is, as I've already shown,
I'll update it right now and see if we got the next day
that you have stopped delivering aid entirely since May 5th,
0, 0, 0, 0, nothing.
They are crying to kick this into overdrive right now.
Now that doesn't mean there's not aid coming in from some
other poss some angle people,
doctors bringing it in air, whatever else.
But that means that these down to the bare minimum
of already being shockingly less than they could, they need.
And even if it was over 500 a day right?
Now, as you even heard Patel admit
that right now they need more than food
and then still give in weapons, right?
Because that'll help them stop the starvation, right?
These people are not real honest people guys.
They are actively participating in a genocide while hoping
you'll believe their lives over here.
The aid is not coming through.
Here's Egypt saying they refuse to coordinate
with Israel on the entry of aid from Rafa Crossing.
And this is because as he highlights, oh wait
or did I, yeah, right.
Israel sees control of the Rafa border crossing.
This was on eighth, May 8th now they also kind
of seized the entire area.
So now they're in, they're the ones literally allowing
or not allowing this to process.
And Egypt is saying, we refuse to work with this
and realize long before this,
Israel has been actively stopping aid in every possible
angle, shutting down crossings
and turning it back for anything.
And Asafa and D says, why are the trucks waiting at Rafa?
Why can't they go through the crossing Rafa?
And that's the point. It's because they
are the ones in control of it.
Well, they're pointing at everybody else.
And lastly, I'll finish with this clip
that I think is important just to call
to stand up for those that need your help.
Any references, hind hijab, the young 6-year-old
murdered by Israel in her car
after her parents were killed around her.
The point is that this is not about Jew or Muslim
or Christian or any other religion or ethnicity.
This is about people with compassion standing together
to support people that are being annihilated simply
because of who they are.
That's important. And it will always be important.
And the reality being that that crosses partisan lines,
that crosses all the things we're being forced into.
And nothing scares the establishment more than that.
So thank you for tuning in today guys.
I appreciate your support as always.
There's a lot of ways down below that you can support us
that gives and go the different, uh, platforms like our
buy me a coffee and subscribe star,
the direct donation portal on the website.
We definitely need your support.
We are gonna continue to fight
as we always have no matter what ultimately happens.
But you know, we got a lot of stuff coming up, a lot
of trails and tribulations coming our way
and it's gonna be difficult
to keep this going the way we have.
But that's my, that's my goal, that's my personal obligation
because I just feel like, you know,
when you do this long enough, it feels like the,
the days you don't do something,
you're somehow letting somebody down.
You know? And I know that's not the reality,
but I feel like it's very, very hard
for me not to see, you know?
And, and quite frankly on a positive side of that,
I feel like everything we do legitimately trickles through
or reverberates through the conversation.
I believe we're making a difference, guys.
It's because of you. We wouldn't be
here if it wasn't for you.
You are the last American vagabond.
So thank you for your support. I love you all as always.
Question everything. Oops. Lemme do this.
Before I do that, forgot I had to put it on the side.
So apologize for the delay. Hold on a second.
As that uploads, thank you for all the
kind support comments
and the amazing community that we have.
Guys, I appreciate all of you.
And by the way, as I've mentioned on the the Substack,
I'm gonna be probably the next couple days putting out
and I'm thinking maybe the 30th or something like that.
I'll put out the official date
for the founders meeting
we're gonna be doing at the end of the month.
So keep an eye for that and make sure
you check out our substack in general.
A lot of great stuff going through there.
We got some new posts coming from Zoe pretty soon
and plenty else coming your way.
So as always, I was saying question everything.
Come to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.
- You also six years old in her car.
You all heard the audio, you amplified that she was six.
She calls the red crescent
and she says, I'm scared I'm stuck in the car.
They said, where's your family?
She said, I'm surrounded by their corpses. They're dead.
- . - He tries to read for to, he tells
to reassure her, we will send the ambulance.
The genocides was
so merciless when the ambulance turned up 24 hours,
the tanks blew up.
The ambulance, him six years old, died alone surrounded
by the corpses of her famine.
CiDRA CiDRA CiDRA was playing
with her cousin running on the road.
They told them, go to the south, we won't touch the south.
But they lied. The liars, they lied.
They bombed the north and then bombed the south CiDRA.
The pictures went viral because of you.
You showed the world. She was hanging from the wall
with her legs blown off.
You have exposed the genocides,
which is why they are ringing the bells to get you
to be quiet, which is why they are waiting for us
to slip up, to expose us.
They are worried that now that the world has seen the truth,
the highest Jewish representative in the US in the Senate,
Chuck Schumer himself, comes out
and says, Israel is on course to be coming.
A pariah state, Elizabeth Warren says that if the law is
to be applied, Israel is committing genocide.
Even the right wingers in Donald Trump's rally,
they're chanting genocide Joe.
Genocide Joe, you entered areas Palestine couldn't enter
before you delivered the message to corners.
It couldn't reach before.
It wasn't because of the mainstream media, it was you.
You carried the voice. You are making the change.
You are changing the world.
They are desperate for you to go home.
They want you to pack your Tencent, go home,
tell them and roar.
We're not going home until Palestine is free. Let.