-
- Welcome to the daily wrap up, a
- Concise show dedicated to bringing
- You the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours,
- Friday, May 10th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, right now, I am technically in the new location.
I'm gonna play a little clip to open you,
to give you another quick insight to what we're the,
the work we've done so far.
But it's just fun. I just want to, again, shout out
to all the people being all the support we've had in regard
to getting the new steps moving
and all the support for the things we're dealing with,
which I have an update on that as well
that I'll give you before we get going.
But it's just funny today to, to express out
of the gate little personal note, how,
how difficult this process has been.
Only because I've tried to work the entire time
as best I could, which most, you know,
in most cases it makes more sense to sort of just
pause while you get everything going.
, as you guys can clearly tell new background every
third day, and, you know, things are shifting around.
It's, it's just very, and right,
right now I think the sound is a little off
because it's all completely cleared out
because we're, you know, gonna be
putting up some sounding and stuff.
So it might be a little bit of an echo every day.
But the point is, the work is more important than me
worrying about the little, you know, nuances
and problems we may have along the way.
So that's what's obviously the point is what's most
important to me and what we do is the work
and the information, whether
or not some new person to the show might be, you know,
scared away by the fact
that we don't have the right background, you know,
whatever people think is important.
I was on, on the show with, uh, Kevin Barrett today
and frustratingly enough I wasn't able
to get the lighting just 'cause I was in a rush.
But same kind of point, you know, that,
that it's an interesting thing that we try to emulate a,
a a a process
or a institution that is something we know to be dishonest,
but nonetheless, I think decorum is important.
But then on that note, here's a little clip
that I wanna show you about where we're at.
And so last time you saw it, there was no walls.
And so at this point, now we've got the walls put up
everything, the, the sheet, the sheet rock,
which was the last kind of hitch, is now put up.
Everything's drying. And
so now you can actually see this main area right here is
gonna be the whole setup where one part of it's gonna be
where I'm doing this now with sort
of a background like I had
before, that'll be my office right there.
The other room's gonna be sort of like an opening area
to kinda separate people coming in from
where we might be recording.
And, you know, a plan is to have something larger in there
that we will also set up
for a pirate stream and whatever else.
So just want you guys to give an update on that
because I'm excited about what this will become.
And now an another update on the other stuff I wanted
to tell you, I had a really long talk today
with our lawyer about the upcoming lawsuits.
And unfortunately enough, there's now a third one
coming from the same group, different person.
So I talked to him today about this
and the reason I I I, the, the main thing,
obviously the rest of what we discussed
and what's happening, and you know, what we're, how,
you know, the, the balancing
of whether we think it's worth it to keep pushing
and fighting, which, you know, the bottom line being,
I'm gonna lose either way, lawyers' fees
and what it costs to, to go through this process.
And then if I lose, I possibly having
to pay their lawyers' fees and all this different stuff.
All based on fri frivolous, ridiculous copyright lawsuits.
Now I'm gonna talk about this for not today, just
for interest, interest of time and everything else,
but I'm gonna probably the next show or one, one
after that talk I, I'm gonna make sure I tell you everything
that's going on with their names included.
I talked to him about this today
and he still recommends that it, it, there's,
there could be a downside to doing so,
but I just feel very clearly that this is a, I mean,
and so does my lawyer, and this is not somebody who is
necessarily, you know, he, I don't, I don't know
what you'd call mainstream or whatever else.
Somebody who wouldn't just jump to the conclusion
that there's something deeper behind this that's going on
and he's convinced that this has nothing to do with
what would be their client's interests or their interests.
Clearly this seems to be dragged out to the maximum
detriment to me, both with time and money.
Not, not even. I mean, we've laid out
what they claim in regard to
how much they think these images that we've used, which
as you guys know, I mean, I, I go through the my best,
the everything I do that I think I'm able to do
and able to try to use images
that I believe are not copyrighted by somebody else
or things that I believe are creative commons.
The most of the people in this field know that it's,
and by the way, if you know of
something, please end it my way.
There's not some kind of like reverse image search
that you can use to like guarantee, you know, whether
or not something is copyrighted.
There's obvious cases where it's clear.
But the point is, on top of that, I,
and I'm not, I've made this clear before, I think
and point to James Corot's work.
I have a very, I have an issue with the concept of
how copyright is done today
and how it's sort of a dying concept in general with the way
that the world works and the internet, but it's still there.
And I still do my best to, to observe that point being is
that these lawsuits have come in regard
to things they claim were violating action was taken in,
in order to go, okay, if you say that's yours, then I,
that's, I'm happy not to use it.
But the point is, it's not about trying to deal
with that small issue.
It's about trying to penalize me more than is necessary
for whatever they think they're owed.
And the point being is that when I show them the amount
of page views, let's say that this image was shown,
what their argument being
that I've somehow made all millions
of dollars from using this guy's image and so on, it, I,
and I divide that by the page views
of the timeframe and the total revenue.
I mean, it comes out to like $50. Like it's ridiculous.
And they're asking for like 30 grand.
I mean, this is like this absurd, absurd situation.
And one of these, by the way, it's something
that I think is shockingly rare to people
that I talk to in this field.
Like people that I've been doing this for decades
and they've gotten these never and just ignored them.
Nothing ever, they, nothing ever came of it.
I've gotten three of them, three of them in the last
so many months from the same groups with different clients.
So somebody is targeting me in this regard.
And now we're going through
trying to make sure we're checking.
I mean, I, I didn't mean to get into all this today.
My point is I'm gonna go into this much deeper like I
promised I would and I plan on talking about the
groups they're talking about here.
Because even according to my lawyer, these are
ambulance chasers for the, for lack of a better term.
I mean, we're talking about groups that do this
and this is their entire job.
They seek people out to throw frivolous lawsuits out
and hope that you settle, which is the interesting point.
And there's articles written about these groups from years
in the past about how that's what they do
and yet they are refusing to settle
for us even though we're offering far more than it's worth.
So all that to be said, we have a long way to go.
And that's another reason why I need your support.
If you wanna see the te I mean one of the, one
of the worries that I have not to start
with such a bad note is
that this will end up being a position where we are unable
to afford whatever ultimately happens.
Like let's just hypothetically say we lose one
or all of these lawsuits.
And that will force me into something like declaring
bankruptcy, which is nice.
What's ridiculous is that's for not even remotely
where we are with this platform.
I mean, we're wildly successful in every possible way.
The fact that we're hiring new people
and bringing on new writers,
I mean, clearly we're doing well.
And this is, uh, the idea
that this would be declaring bankruptcy is
so absurdly frustrating because it's only
because of this manipulative situation
and trying to hurt this platform
for very obvious reasons in my opinion.
But all that's to be said, you know,
we're gonna keep fighting no matter what.
And even if I am to having to do that,
I'm not gonna stop doing this.
I'll probably flee to some actual pirate
situation on a ship somewhere,
and broadcast pirate radio,
and I'll still be tlab no matter what they say.
The point is that that would be, I argue,
the only thing they'd be going
after to, to go through this process in order
to seize the domain, domain name and the name itself,
and do things with that and manipulate the whole situation.
But because of you guys, we can continue.
So I, I just need your support in all of that.
But more importantly than any of that to maintain the work
that we're currently doing, the work of Derek and Robert
and Whitney and Taylor and, and and Matt and,
and Jason with the po the stuff on Twitter.
I mean, just do an amazing work.
So I'm gonna start, we're gonna go over today
a quick section just to give you some shout out, some work
that just came out and some stuff
around some medical freedom
conversations that I think are important.
And by the way, I do have an entire, like a whole bunch
of stuff that I've pulled off
that I wanna ev whether it's in the same day
or it's own show, which is I find difficult with
how much happens every day around foreign policy.
Right now I'm, I'm gonna make sure I take time
to do just a focus on things
that are not related to foreign policy.
'cause there's really a lot to catch up on in regard
to medical freedom itself.
Even covid, Ovid 19 conversations, tuberculosis outbreaks,
they claim, I mean, all sorts of stuff.
New covid variants, new MNA shots that, yeah, I mean,
it's just crazy and I'm gonna have a couple
of points I'll make today, but, you know,
and to, so you guys know,
I still keep track of all this stuff.
It's all there and I'm still watching.
And if the things are big enough
and I think like something, it's not just
to keep you updated about the lies,
but something really big is shifting.
I'll always make sure I tell you and let,
and let you know what's going on.
But at, on that note as well,
make sure you're watching other independent media.
Don't just watch the last American vagabond.
You're rarely gonna hear that from anybody in this field,
but it's important that you do
because you need to make sure you're broadening your
perspectives and listening to other people
and considering other opinions even from myself.
Now, we're also gonna get into an important development
right outta the gate in regard to the United Nations
and how this is a shifting, I mean it's been shifting for,
for a long time, but since October 7th, the conversation
around Israel occupied Palestine has just
completely shifted.
Like, and it it's in its entirely new zone at this point.
And I don't, I don't know whether, I mean, I feel
that there are elements of this, like for instance,
people like at Francesca Albany
and different people that are parts of the un apparatus,
I genuinely think that they're fighting
for the oppressed people of Palestine.
No, I could be wrong. I'm never, I'm not saying we know
for sure, I'd never speak on people's intentions
or what they secretly think.
'cause we're not stupid like the independent media
or the mainstream, a alternative media.
But I still believe there are parts of that.
That's, that's to say though that I think that it's whether
or not you believe the change, the shift is genuine,
it is still something that we should be pointing out,
highlighting, and trying to use for the, the,
the genuine shift that we want to see happen.
And realize that I think in media, government, every,
I mean the international bodies, there are people now
that are beginning to shift
because they recognize that we are going to, whether they do
or not, that's an important middle part in that,
that doesn't mean it's still, it's still a positive
to see them being forced to shift.
But we have to remember that not all
of them really believe what they're talking about.
Biden, anybody else? Trump?
Well, he's, he's pretty much says what he thinks,
which is good, but it's also bad because he is terrible.
But the idea being that Biden at the very
least is trying to hide that.
I don't mean that as a good thing,
it's even more disgusting.
I like to see what Trump is or all of them.
But the point being that even people like Biden are starting
to act like they need to do more and Netanyahu is a problem
and meanwhile they're still actively
actively supporting what's going on in
Gaza and plenty of other things.
We'll get to campus protests
and some other developments if we have time.
And we'll see if we get there. I wanna start
with a shout out to a really important conversation we had
with Zoe Smith, who is a medical coder whistleblower
around the COVID-19 conversation.
Now, if you haven't, I I, I should grab this as well.
This, this is, it's an important, an important conversation
and it got it, got some interesting attention around,
I dunno, a couple weeks ago because she was on the CHD bus I
think, and she got a quick little interview
where she was talking about some of this conversation
and all of a sudden Alex Jones noticed it.
All of a sudden everyone's pointing at which, good,
good get the information out there.
But again, I always highlight how irritating it is
that these important conversations
that we've been talking about, not just T Lab,
but a lot of other quite prominent independent media,
but nonpartisan, it doesn't get really picked up, not
by the, you know, at least the perception of that.
And that that's what's so frustrating is here is her article
from May 5th, 2023 on RT Lab Substack about the same
conversation, my life in the Thrill Kill
Medical Cult by Zoe Smith.
Very important conversation.
And this discussion we had on May 9th, 2024
was just about highlighting this going forward and,
and the discussion of what she saw as a medical coder.
The thing I highlight in the interview I love is her framing
of this as sort of a sim as as so you guys remember, or,
or understand, I would say remember,
I think we've talked about it before, but as I write here
as a, uh, witness the alleged pan, uh, wait,
I'll just read it here, here.
We discuss what she witnessed, excuse me,
during the alleged pandemic while working
as a medical coder, one
who translates medical data into standardized codes used
for billing insurance claims and medical research,
and all departments submit their codes
for treatments given the act, uh, treatments given
and actions taken, giving the medical coder a unique
national medical overview.
That's the part I like. So we describes this sort of a sim,
city-like view of all that's taking place.
So think about that. So all these different departments are
all submitting these codes.
It's going through a government process, right?
So I'd imagine they don't think something like this is gonna
happen and yet this, this,
and it's not just herb, many coders in these positions can
see all of this coming in from different directions.
And what does that give them? Well, it gives them this kind
of 10,000 elevation view
or whatever the phrasing is on that.
The idea being that they can see, okay, wait a minute,
they're claiming there's all these cases,
but that's not what the codes show.
Oh, look over here they're claiming all these people are
dying, Franks y and d, but the codes don't add up to that.
Or rather the codes are being misused
or all these different elements
that she was able to pick up on.
And that's what started her journey on this.
And it says she describes the illusion
that was created using this system
and the many different manipulations that took place on top
of the codes that she witnessed
and are ongoing to this very day, as you know,
in proper PCR testing cycle threshold discrepancies,
combination of flu
and pneumonia with the presented covid numbers
and the co the conflation
of very clear injection side effects
with the illusion of COVID-19.
And as I wrote, and I think this is important,
and this is not hyperbole at its most basic level,
what she's describing is medical fraud.
We all know that yet when considering the full breadth
of willful deception.
So there's no denying that anymore
and deadly fallout, which we all see
that followed their deceptions, this rises undeniably
to the level of medical genocide.
Now, I'm not just using the word genocide
because it's something that's on people's minds right now.
Like if we're really gonna stand back
and acknowledge what a genocide means
and all the debates about whether things are met, intentions
and on, I mean, would we look at what just happened
and all the evidence that's come out now, the intent part
is clearly I I've never seen a genocide
with more obvious intent than what's going on in
Gaza and from Israel.
But we know that this was here
and we can now see that there was lies, clear efforts
to hide their actions, hide what they knew from us.
I mean even at the point of like, oh, that was another one
that AstraZeneca being pulled.
You know what's funny to me is that's huge news
to some people and it is in general,
but we've been talking about these damn same things
for 45 years or what is it now?
Yeah, I mean almost, I mean pretty much
four years, four plus years.
And it's frustrating because it's not new information.
Now you've got all these people reeling about
how we couldn't have known it's, you know, it's,
it's uh, what's his name?
Scott Adams all over again.
I was right even though I was wrong
and you were wrong, even though you're right
because no one could have known you mean, except
for the clear scientific research that we literally saw
or the many, many, many, many doctors that came out
and said, I can see this and you can see that.
And there's clots and blood clot, I mean everything.
So were they just imagining that stuff?
No, they looked, they cared.
Or someone like Cuomo going on one of these shows
and saying, oh well, you know, we,
we were given bad information.
So what you're admitting is you blindly trusted things
that were handed to you.
That's not journalism you moron.
That's complete blind ignorance to
what you're told is the story.
Yet here they are trotting them out on some
of these mainstream alternative media channels.
Act as if there's some new heroes in this conversation.
Now it could be that they genuinely want to do good,
but overall they should not be regarded
as somehow championing this conversation.
And a lot of people have picked up on this.
We're now being redirected into some new situation
where we act like, well, I mean, you know, we,
we pointed this out in 2021.
We predicted this would happen at some point.
'cause it always does. Where at some point when they have
lost enough, they shift into, well, you know, it was kind
of bad and we we'll throw you a fraction
of the bone that you know, is there.
What we'll end up making it like, well,
if we just had vaccinated more
or if we listened to the right person,
or if it was the Democrats instead of Trump
that controlled it, well we and people fall for it.
Make sure you watch this if you wanna understand the
deeper provable reality.
And by the way, I'll actually include this too.
I always do because this is such a important part of this
in regard to not proving that this is a fake or an illusion.
I mean, I I I take that back,
I would argue it proves it's an illusion.
But whether it's fake is up for you to decide.
The point is Denny Rancor is a PhD
and his amazing work on this has proven and
and it's not hard to recognize this if you actually look at
all the information that the data itself proves
that the whole thing was an illusion.
Not that it was necessarily fake.
I think those things are one and the same.
But my point is that his argument is that you,
if you look at the information, you can prove
that you did not need some kind of a new pandemic to,
to make it look the way it did.
You needed what we just described.
You needed the combination of flu
and pneumonia that we've,
they've been doing long before COVID-19.
And we've proven that before.
You need to put the PCR manipulations the cycle threshold
discrepancies that could then
after that the vaccine side effects that became COVID-19
and on and on and on.
And you can almost statistically prove
that this is what could have happened.
So as if you can consider that as a possibility,
you must consider that it is
something that they considered as well.
Any case, I'll include these for you two to read,
understand, to watch all with source material as always.
And Zoe, by the way, is working on a couple new
things for T Lab Substack.
So keep an eye out for that. Now also,
just on that note, I thought this was hilarious.
A couple of points I wanna include Daily mail reports.
Pfizer agrees to settle 10,000
lawsuits for vaccine side effects.
No, no for accusing pharma, giant of hiding cancer, risks
of heartburn, drugs, zantax, , you know,
just a completely different fraud
case that we're not gonna talk about.
You mean on top of the thousands
of other fraud cases they've been accused of and lost.
But don't question Pfizer because how dare you.
I mean, it, it's just shockingly ignorant
that we pretend this is not a fraudulent organization
who has been caught lying about exactly
what we've always been talking about.
Lying about side effects, lying about efficacy,
lying about everything.
I mean, I'll just do this real quick
because this is just funny.
It's a good time to play this. I haven't played these things
in a long time or where is it?
Right here
- Has brought to you by Pfizer CBS Health Watch, sponsored
by Pfizer Anderson, Cooper 360, brought to you
by Pfizer, a
- BC news Nightline brought to you by Pfizer,
making a difference brought to you by Pfizer,
- CNN tonight brought to you by,
- You get the point
that goes on for like three minutes.
Not a big surprise there.
I wonder why they were so confused about
what they were handed or not at all.
They just blindly trusted it.
Taylor Hudak points out do not fall
for this new scripted rewrite of history
regarding COVID-19 jabs in February, 2021.
And this is the point we're making several doctors,
and I mean, and this is regard to the specifically covid
for doc co, uh, doctors for Covid ethics.
But in 2021 there was a waterfall of people
and it's the shocking minority.
And I say shocking because it was so obvious.
That means that the, the sad reality is most
of these doctors who were either too stupid to see
that they were missing something which is scary
or they chose to ignore it for many different reasons.
I any of that's terrifying.
My point though is that there was a lot of people
that stood up and scientists who wrote
to the EMA warning about the risks
of the very things they just shockingly discovered.
Blood clot strokes, autoimmune disease,
more in an effort to stop the harm.
Oh, and there's another one by the way,
I'll talk about probably in the next couple shows in regard
to a weird and shocking baffling autoimmune disease process.
They're now discovering that they totally connected
to covid even though weirdly none of them, most
of the ones they're talking, none of them.
The point is a lot of them didn't even have covid.
Think about how dumb that is. So
we're talking about an autoimmune pro.
The thing that we know for very clear provable examples can
be caused by many different injections.
Autoimmune de de auto, uh, de now I'm forgetting the term
antibody dependent, uh, antibody dependent enhan, you
what, how of the hell is that possible?
I've talked about that 40,000 times .
But any, the number of the different autoimmune immune
suppression, all the different things that we've proven are
coming as a byproduct
of many different injections including this.
And then you can see that happening in a,
in a 90% vaccinated
population, which is what they're talking about.
And not all of them were even vaccinated, but they go,
but it was probably COVID-19
or not, excuse me, not I'm mixing this up.
Not all of them had covid as they admit,
but they go probably because of COVID-19
ignoring the obvious culprit.
So it's just so many things going on.
Antibody dependent enhancement.
That's what I'm pretty sure it is.
I dunno why that's confusing me.
Other point I think is actually not surprising at all,
but it's just too bad people didn't wanna listen.
Oh is tell me if the audio is skipping for anybody else.
Okay, good. Sharon's asking in this chat.
So the whole brain machine interface, you know,
not the bad one, the good one.
'cause Elon's doing it, you know, the good guy ai,
but , I can't even think about the good guy.
Great reset, whatever. But the point is, Tom, I,
Tommy Mack says I'm shocked.
Shocked. I tell you, Elon Musk neuro Neuralink chip
malfunctions in the first human brain implant.
You mean like it did in the other ones when they were
testing on monkeys and they did it on human anyway.
Yes. But the older point that I think is so ridiculous,
is it, so the whole point is about increasing in, in,
in general, whether that's the idea of, you know,
more body function for people that are paralyzed or all the,
but it's in or just maximizing your brain processes.
It says neuro lynx suffered an unexpected problem,
but it's first ever human implant as the device began
to detach from the patient's skull.
Yeah, it sounds like they worked this one out really well.
Reducing the, reducing the amount
of data it could capture .
So that just sounds crazy that that's what,
so the whole game is about capturing data .
Yeah, welcome to Twitter guys. I think that's hilarious.
But oh my point is that it actually decreased the process.
I mean it just seems so crazy to me
that anybody is even pretending like this is
where we should be or anybody's pretending
that we should be doing this on people right now.
This is experimentation,
you're watching this happen in real time.
Now another great article that just came out
that Derek's gonna be doing a couple of parts on,
and this is a very contentious topic
because this company,
Bethany Christian Services is very litigious.
They sue constantly for stuff.
So he'll probably get another lawsuit coming our way
for this very objective and fact-based re re uh, reporting.
But the point is, it's just highlighting what we can,
what people have reported and what people are accusing it of
and just kind of trying to flip, seek out the details.
A Christian adoption firm with accusations of manipulation,
negligence, and trafficking.
Now you can argue whether that's goes to the level
of sex trafficking, it doesn't seem to be that
that's what anybody can prove.
But there are congressmen that are openly accusing them
of trafficking, which remember that just happens to mean
that, you know, they, like if you're taking children from
one location to another state in order to get them
with a different family without legal process, then
that's trafficking, right?
And so there's a lot of very fishy stuff going
on around this conversation.
And it actually brought up an interesting,
actually I should have grabbed this, an interesting
conversation that we've had in the past.
It was, shoot,
lemme grab this really quickly now,
if you guys remember a conversation we had,
and I forget exactly what this was related to.
It was a children's kind of detention center.
I think it had to do with migrants.
And the point was that there was a senator that went there
and got arrested for trying
to ask questions about what was going on.
It was a government funded group,
but kind of like tangential, like, so it was really little,
no little to no accountability.
I believe it was Southwest
key, I think is the name of the group.
It's interesting the overlap to this in regards to how the,
just the general concept of how government, uh,
even just taking CCPs for example,
or any kind of children protect
and services, there's so much that goes on in these systems
that they'll admit that's just shocking to most people.
That even themselves, that people
that have worked there will admit
that there's like a, a pipeline.
Here we go. This is one of them anyway, or two of them.
There's a pipeline of, of, you know, kind of foster care
to, to sex trafficking.
Now you don't have to argue that that's
because of the foster care system, but
nonetheless it's present and they'll admit it.
And so we should be very concerned about how that works.
Now this is from a, an article in 2018
where we discussed the Southwest key discussion.
But here's the article discussing the main point,
which is another Southwest key employee charged
with sexual abusing children.
And this, this one's from 2018.
Now, if you remember the conversation,
I think it was, I forget his name.
Oh, just watch the show. I just went over it again recently.
There was a, a Newsweek article as well.
Let's see if that pops up. It doesn't look like it.
I'll grab it and try and include it afterward.
But where he confronted this location
and in a very, very weird way
was very resistant to even listening.
They wouldn't talk to him. And the point was, it just,
it brought up all this, all the thought we were having
around this timeframe and what was really going on
and the shadowy groups that were involved in, you know,
the Epstein conversation, all
these different overlaps to this.
So he's gonna follow up on this in regard
and that's in no way to suggest that that is exactly
what we're talking about this group.
It's just that there are now accusations here
and it's very important to follow up on these things
when we're dealing with children.
You know, especially talking about the overlap
to foreign policy, you know, like we've talked about
with David Hamlin, these different conversations,
the overlap with the Mormon church conversation
where there was that in issue
with the, with the trafficking.
Again, same point about children being adopted from Ukraine.
You know, there's just all these very weird
and the point is that most
of these people in government positions,
they just feel like they're above the law.
Even if it's small things, they feel like they're skirting.
It's still, you know, very alarming
and overlapping that with foreign policy I think is the
important consideration from places like Syria
where there has been articles written about how many law
where all the lost children from area, hundreds of thousands
where people just can't account for.
I think we know what's going on
there and I think it's very alarming.
And I'm not saying we know who,
but it seems like nobody cares to find out.
So things like this that really make worry me.
So he, Derek's gonna be following up on this also
before we start in the main point today,
I wanna make sure you didn't miss this, it's not new
because this is like Tuesday for us in the last week,
and this is from last week.
So the ninth I posted this T lab has been blocked from
streaming on Instagram right now.
We're still blocked and I guess they, it was like a
14 day pause or who even knows why.
And unceremoniously just deleted from TikTok,
which I find shockingly funny
because of what's going on right now where they're like,
TikTok is allowing anti-Israel
content I guess unless you prove it.
Which is what I said here. This while we're being told it's
allowing negative content about Israel,
I guess not when you prove a source material,
which is the same point with Patreon and AstraZeneca, right?
You can say all these things, you just can't prove it,
even though now we know it is proven
and we're still blocked on Patreon, both Whitney and myself.
But this is what we deal with guys, is
that we just get boxed outta the conversation.
No, TikTok is censoring us I think
because we're showing these things.
And I think that really shows you
that remember TikTok is not a Chinese
company the way they're trying to frame it.
Like it could ultimately be that in the end game.
But I can't see that. I see a Singaporean CEO
and I see very clear CCE or us backing all over the place.
But I also see Chinese influence on this.
But my point is that this argue,
it's just this Chinese controlled entity.
Well your government's trying to censor you everywhere
and TikTok seems to be this central place
through which a lot of this content is happening,
showing what's really going on.
It's just that it's so many people are so willfully ignorant
about things that creep into their partisan beliefs.
That's always why I called it two party illusion,
but nothing new.
Same old, same old for the last American bagga bond.
But we won't stop now getting into the
conversation of Gaza in Israel.
I think it's important to, oh that's why I forgot.
I wanna start with . It's
funny or we'll share this with me.
So it's kind of a ridiculous story,
but it seems to be real hundreds of hornets.
I'm not, well they say bees in this quote,
so I'm not sure if it hornets or bees,
I guess you can call them kind of interchangeably attack I
idea of soldiers in Southern Casa.
That's interesting. And I said, well, bees can smell fear.
So I think seems to make sense to me.
And the point is, they say, I have never seen a similar case
of hundreds of bees attacking like this.
It's just funny to me. You know, the joke obviously being
that they're getting, you know, both ideological
or what's the right word for it, the narrative world,
they're being completely destroyed.
And also on the field it seems like as many,
despite the fact that their body count is a hell
of a lot higher because they're just
murdering everyone in front of them.
Civilians predominantly, if not entirely,
they're losing in every possible way.
And everyone including Israel admits that
and Israel society hart's articles, they,
they're kinda like, we need to be honest, they Israel lost.
And they're openly saying that now.
So I think they're scared guys. I think we all know that.
So I think that's pretty funny. But it's also very true.
Not that they attack them 'cause they're scared,
but this should might not make a joke out of it.
Now, I wanted to start with this
because I found this to be wildly entertaining
and there's a lot of interesting points to make about this
that go both ways now.
What, what we're, what we're gonna see here, a great clip
from the squirrel who I also agree is as much
as he gets a lot of engagement,
I think he's shockingly suppressed on this platform.
And it just shows you how much reach they get anyway.
And it's organically because people like us share it
and people, you know, that I think that's the same with us.
We're still, you know,
slowly growing even though occasionally I'll see it drop
like 300 followers and just have to go back up again.
And I think we all deal with that, but I just don't care.
I don't even talk about it anymore. The point though is
that I, I think we, you grow, you go inching inch
by inch very slow despite the fact that, you know,
that we're much more reach a lot of us do.
On that point aside, this is a great clip
where he is talking about a big new budzinski
who if you don't know, is a big new brezinski.
It's too a lot to get into,
but just look up the information around his ties
to the US government in the beginning of sort
of like the seventies in regard to the balkanization
of the Middle East and, and the plans that he put forward
and kind of the thoughts he's had about what kind
of laid the groundwork for what we're still going
through right now all throughout the Middle East.
And what's fascinating about this is he's talking
with Joe Scarborough, who is first
and foremost, he is the, uh, uh, Prezinski is the father of
Mika Brezinski who is sitting right next to Joe.
And what's hilarious about this whole back
and forth is that I, first
and foremost, I think that there's an important difference
of the old guard, new guard kind of conversation here,
where you've got people like Brezinski who are sort
of unabashedly authoritarian in a way,
like I anything clearly,
but like the idea being that they don't seem like they try
to hide it and they're happy
to have like unfiltered conversations.
A lot of them, at least that was a lot back then.
And some of them like this, like at this point about how,
you know, yeah, we should do that or we should occupy
that country, we should, you know, that kind of a thing.
And what's funny is he's talking to somebody like Joe,
who I argue is like the new guard, which is not even meant
to be an, in a a, a positive thing.
I think these people are just puppets, quite frankly.
Like that's the shift is you went away from this idea that,
you know, it's like going from the, the, the war department,
which is what it was originally called to calling it the,
the department defense, right?
Well, it's not about defense, it's about war.
The department, that's what they do.
But they knew that you would like it better if they called
the defense instead of war, sort
of like Israel's defending itself as opposed to waging war.
It's how they play the game.
So the shifting to people like Joe
and the way that they presented, and to be clear,
obviously we're talking about media versus politicians, but
nonetheless, same thing with the people
that are now in the roles today.
Like the people you see, I don't think they're,
I think they're bad at this in a lot
of ways compared to people like him.
And I also think that they're more willing
to hide literally everything which makes people see
right through them to a large degree.
So it's not, I like, it's kinda
like I talked about Donald Trump.
I see, I, I don't, I see them as all as very dangerous
and terrible people, but I would prefer Trump
because at least he says exactly what he's gonna do.
So there's no hidden game.
He is just being very clear about how he's belligerently,
authoritarian and will steal resources.
And you know, at least you can be honest about that.
It's like ki that's kind of
the difference I see between them.
And what's funny about this back
and forth is that the only reason I'm saying that
because I don't see as any either side of this as sort
of like the good side or the honest side.
I see them all as dishonest.
But what's funny is Brezinski is wildly insulting Joe.
'cause Joe's like, these people
are not that bright in my opinion.
And Brezinski just makes fun of him about how you're, you're
so shockingly uninformed
and these are people that are essentially on the same side.
Really what he's attacking him for is
that he doesn't understand the inner workings
of the real relationship between Israel, the United States
and the deals that were had.
He admits that they did in fact riddled these deals
with poison pills to make sure that Israel, that Gaza
and the Palestinians didn't accept them
and even went as far as to make sure that they were able to,
which again, he'll make the point to say
that's not what anybody else thinks.
Well, because you're blindly, just like with Cuomo, Cuomo
accepting what you're handed by people above you,
which is ignorance, that's not journalism.
So listen to what Zarinsky Zarinsky has, uh,
it's a big new brezinski interesting
name has to say about this.
- We do the next time Israel is attacked, uh,
ha from, from a a, a third, uh, from an outside force,
- And I'm sorry, 2008 for those in the podcast,
this is 2008, which I find very relevant.
Remember 2008 was the one I, off the top of my head,
lemme know in the chat, what was the name
of the, was it cast lead?
I think that, I forget which one it was we're talking about
in 2008, but it was another time
where there was a massive onslaught carried out by Israel.
- What do we do at that point? That's, that's,
- That's the wrong question. No,
- That's not the wrong question because,
because we never get the
- Question I'm trying to answer.
- We never get the condemnation of Hamas or Hezbollah.
It's always after Israel responds to defending himself.
- No, it's not. The problem is that this conflict has lasted
for years and the United States has been largely passive.
So the right question is not
what do we do when things break down?
The right question is what do we do to avoid a breakdown
by being engaged seriously in the peace process?
- Okay, so I think what he means,
and you want my honest opinion, is that
what he's saying is we need to be more involved
to make sure we can manipulate the
understanding of what's going on.
That's kind of what I'm just so you get
what I'm saying about how they're both sort of arguing we
to lie about every, you know, we're they're,
I think they're both unabashedly on the side
of Israel, quite frankly,
- And for the last eight years we haven't been,
and that's why we have the mess like we have
right now in our hands. You,
- You, you can't blame
what is happening in Israel right now
on the Bush administration.
- Yes, you can't, you can't.
- Let's go back to 2000. Dr.
Prezinski, you and I both know Bill Clinton gave,
- I'm sorry, I had to put one more time.
Just look at . This is just so entertaining to me.
Look at, look at Mika, look at the camera.
So we figure we have to understand.
So m this is Mika's father, right?
And and they're, they're together, right?
So there's, this is wildly uncomfortable
because he's, you know, they're kind of like,
this is like the, the, the step father-in-law
and they're kind of like butting heads
about what the reality is.
And let's be clear, Rasinski is wildly more informed
of what's going on because frankly he laid this at
the table for what they're talking about.
So it's hilarious to see Joe act
like he knows what he's talking about.
And I think that's kind of what spun
Brzezinski to kind of push back on him.
But watch Mika look at the camera. You can,
- But you can't.
- Joe, Joe, let's go back to 2000. Dr.
Brezinski, you and I both know Bill Clinton gave Arafat
and the Palestinians everything.
You know, you had, they could have wanted
- Such a stunningly superficial knowledge of what went on
that it's almost embarrassing to listen to you. Oh,
- It's almost embarrassing to listen to you.
These are people that are put forward
as like the in the know journalist.
And even though it's like the morning Joe,
it's like the bottom of the barrel
of the informed journalist or where they presented,
but still they present them as somehow being in the know
and they're, you know, .
He's just like, you're embarrassing right
now. I love it. What
- Is it?
If you were to look more closely
what happened in the Clinton Mac, uh, cam David discussions,
you would know that we have just said
it is absolutely wrong.
There were all sorts of provisions
and catches to the so-called proposal,
- Meaning that there were re they, they made sure
that it would look outwardly like something that pe like
that was Palestine refusing it.
But they put those there to make sure
that it wouldn't work, is what he's describing.
- And it wasn't rejected.
The negotiations went on in Taba Uhhuh
and then there were elections in Israel.
Uhhuh and Sharon came in
and everything got aborted in the last eight years.
We had a policy meaning
- That the person who got elected
after that sort of put a stop to it.
But see the, the narrative from the US government was
to argue that that was the,
and what do you hear from Clinton?
Both of them by the way and everybody else,
they walked away your as your as uh, uh, Arafat walked away,
which is what Joe says because he's repeating things he is
nothing was nothing about, but it's not the truth.
Isn't it funny how these real, these basic realities
that he, I mean he knows he was involved
and he is telling you that's not what happened yet
nonetheless, the organized propagandized narrative
that gets set in stone, that all these mindless journalists
that are in the know repeat because that's what their job is
and they don't even know any better say it all the time.
And so it just, a lie repeated becomes the truth.
- See, in which we have proclaimed an interest in peace.
Condi Rice has traveled 16 times in 21 months
to the region proclaiming you must
do this, you must do that.
But the United States never exerted itself.
So the issue that Obama faces,
and that's a question that you raised, is are we going
to be sitting there issuing condemnations,
whether it's the Hamas?
- By the way, look at what the lower third says.
Israel defense minister says country in quote, war
to bitter end with Hamas .
I mean it's just so insulting that we can't grasp.
I mean today people have shifted, there's there,
there's no putting this genie back in the bottle.
This is out, people are seeing it now,
but think about how long this has been going on
and it's the same old cycle of nonsense.
It's just that people are finally finding the courage within
the power structures usually
because we are giving them so much pressure
that they feel like they either see a benefit
in doing it or they have to.
It's now coming out. I just think that's crazy
- To the region proclaiming you must
do this, you must do that.
But the United States never exerted itself.
So the issue that Obama faces,
and that's a question that you raised, is are we going
to be sitting there issuing condemnations, whether it's
of Hamas or Israel or anybody else?
Or are we gonna be seriously engaged in the peace process?
That is the question. We
- Have another block and I'm very excited about that
because I'm stunningly superficial chief,
I look forward to you educating me and the rest of America.
- He really tried to make a joke out of it,
but it wasn't a joke, right?
He wasn't being funny. You're stunningly
superficial and uninformed.
Haha. It's just, I guess
that's the best you can do is try to soften the edge. Hold
- On the rest of America
and the rest of the foreign policy community
who have said time
and again, Arafat walked away from
the best deal he could have got.
- Don't you love this? Now look what's funny is they try
to roll him out with the music.
They're like, cut it, cut it, cut him stop.
Because it's getting, it gets more tense towards the end.
But what's funny, so what he's saying is basically
to the person who was there, who was involved
with the process, well you have to talk to the, the rest
of foreign policy, community, whatever that means.
The just the general community .
Like there's not some differing opinions.
Like that's the point. It's like with, you know,
four outta five doctors disagreeing, , that kind
of nonsense they throw at you.
All doctors agree, safe and effective.
Well how'd that work out? It's so silly.
And the point is you, he's just saying that this is
what my betters tell me.
Everyone thinks so you're silly for not agreeing.
I don't even think they recognize
how ignorant that makes them look.
He doesn't know what he's talking about.
- America and the rest of the foreign policy community, who
and the rest of America hold on the rest of America
and the rest of the foreign policy community
who have said time
and again, Arafat walked away from the best deal he could
have got and that the Palestinians
never miss an opportunity.
Facts repeat miss an opportunity.
- Do you hear what he said? You don't have the facts.
You are repeating slogans. I love it. Repeating
- Slogans.
You're repeating slogan. He did not walk away,
finish the fact what he said was, I'm going
to take the proposal to all of the Arab capitals
and see how they react
because the proposals were controversial
and then negotiations went on even
after Christmas where Clinton and Arafat met
and they were going on in Taba in January
after Clinton was already leaving office
and then the got abort it,
- Right?
So it went on way longer after the lie.
We are told after the air, if I walked away,
he's saying it continued past that point.
So we've been lied to and we know
that Joe just is not smart enough to recognize
that obvious reality or that he doesn't care to look past
what he is told is the reality even when somebody was
involved will tell him the truth.
And guys, this is the point.
If you look through this, I mean for crying out loud,
you can have that ridiculous non debate between Dave Smith
and Laura Loomer where this is what Dave was discussing.
You know, my point is that the information is out there if
you care to look past the controlled your, you know,
government narrative managers that hand down information,
which a lot of the mainstream
alternative media also look to,
- It's helpful to know a little bit
about that . It's very,
- It's - Very exciting, Shane.
Sorry I'm stopping it so much.
I know you guys hate it in general, but it's just
so perfect how Mika trying.
She's giving him the hook trying to like pull him off.
Okay guys, let's go to break. And he just doesn't stop.
He's trying to laugh about this.
But guys, this must be really embarrassing for him.
- Son and Arafat met
and they were going on in Taba in January
after Clinton was already leaving office
and then the process got aborted.
Very, it's helpful to know
a little bit about that. It's very,
- It's that's very exciting chief that you know, things
that the rest of the international community
Yes. And now you're
- Going charge your knowledge by the sort
of collective standards of 300 million people,
then don't be surprised that you're embarrassed.
- Wow. You see, you would never see this today.
I think I, I honestly think that because of how
and what a worse position the entire establishment is in
regard to regard to narrative
management that they wouldn't allow this.
Because what he's really highlighting are some
fundamental realities.
Whether or not you're talking about whatever side they're on
that well, okay, if you're just gonna pretend
that this collective narrative is the truth,
because that's what they all say
and that's all, that's the people we're supposed to look to.
Well you're gonna be embarrassed.
You know, it's the same idea that just
because a consensus exists does not make it the truth.
And in most cases, historically, it's not.
In the case of going forward
after the larger conversations like you, like we, I I play
that clip all the time about what is science,
where he talks about academia versus science.
And the point is that the, the trailblazers are the ones
that usually change the discussion, right?
As he, I think the clip, he says the be the best
candlemakers in the world couldn't envision a light bulb
and they fought tooth and
nail to make sure it didn't happen.
But the point is that they, if they,
if we would've trusted the consensus,
we would still be there, right?
And that it's just so constant how that happens.
So important. Clip it very, it really is. So
- I'm not embarrassed I read the New York Times
and the Washington Post and Foreign Affairs.
- You should be embarrassed by that.
, you just, you just admitted,
I just read the propaganda
outlets and I repeat what I'm told
- What I'm gonna do.
I'm gonna throw those away
and anytime I have a question I'm gonna call you up. No,
- Spell it to back top negotiations.
Look him up. It'll be
- Helpful. I
- I'll do that.
. Oh, I wish it was all that fun to watch.
You know, it is just so, it's so entertaining
and make sure you follow as a squirrel.
'cause I think he's doing great work on this.
So let's talk about the UN conversation.
'cause this is actually, again, really powerful
what's be, what's being done here.
And not to say that we, you know, again, I hate
that we even have to always do that, but there's some out
there that would then take pointing to
what their decision is as a positive thing somehow
to mean even though we didn't say it,
that we support everything the UN does,
which no one should ever be that broad stroking,
but it's very common today or assumptive rather.
The point is that the UN is in multifaceted entity
with multifaceted opinions amongst multifacet.
All there's groups and there's, you know,
but when you're talking about the bot,
like the entity itself, right?
Not the different states involved in the voting process
or the different tangential groups
and the people with involved in that,
but the actual entity, I'm, I mean all
of it really question everything.
I don't trust any of these groups,
but the entity itself, I'm very concerned about.
I always have been because of a lot
of different conversations, especially when it comes
to things like global government,
but in the context of just the UN general assembly, right?
We're talking about nation states
and the voting around topics.
And so it's, uh, you could argue that not all of them,
like we said before, care about the Palestinian people.
But I argue some of them do.
And I argue that many
of them just see an interest in citing correctly being on
the right side of history, whether they care or not.
So here's where we are, where we're having
a UN general assembly.
Remember that there, it's, it's on the security council,
there's vetoes in this case there's not.
And the point being that they could pass this,
but realizing that they would need the security council
to sort of enshrine whether Palestine would be accepted
in regard to the un.
And it's a body, but we already saw how the United Nations,
or excuse me, the United States
and Israel being the primary resistance aspects
to this would veto this
or vote down the possibility
of Palestine being a part of it.
While they pretend they've always wanted that.
You know, like everything else, we want a ceasefire veto,
we want peace veto, you know, it's all, they don't want any
of the things, they just wanna pretend they do.
But what's happening now, as he writes arbitrary writes,
this is a big deal and totally unprecedented today,
the UN General Assembly, not the Security Council,
so Novito possible, will vote on a resolution
that Grants Palestine Al Palestine, you know, that place.
It doesn't exist according to the Zionist,
almost the full rights
and privileges of a member quote,
even if the United Nations Security Council fails
to admit Palestine.
So that's what, that's ultimately the point is they almost
full is the idea.
And that, I guess the only way they can go around it,
'cause all if they just said you have all the rights of a,
of an, uh, a member of the U of the United Nations,
and then the United Security Council vetoes it
with the US guarantee they will,
there would be discrepancy there.
So what they're really doing is kind of,
and admittedly working around the normal process,
now you can see that as dishonest
or you can recognize that the reality
of one nation state vetoing what everybody else wants
and acting like that's the normal process.
That's the dishonest reality of this guys.
And so the point is, they're now gonna make it in a way
where they can give them essentially the ability
to push back within the body.
And even if they don't admit them,
they'll still have almost full rights and privileges.
It gives them a voice more than ever before.
Now it says this is designed
to bypass the US veto on Security Council
and is virtually guaranteed
to be approved given the overwhelming support
that Palestine is among the UN member states,
which is the whole point.
It's only Israel and, and the United States
and occasionally the UK that are pushing back on this.
Most always it says the resolution would enable Palestine
to sit among member states, alphabetically,
speak on any agenda item in the UN,
address international groups on its behalf,
and submit resolutions in its name.
I mean, that's, that's the important stuff.
It even gives Palestine the right
to vote in a specific context
in international conferences convened under the
auspices of the General Assembly.
Although they wouldn't, they still wouldn't have the right
to vote in the General Assembly itself, as you cannot do, do
so without the Security Council approval for this.
I mean, this is one of the reasons why a lot
of us recognize the entire concept
of the UN right now is completely broken
because of the, I mean, I I argue that I don't see
a true need for what this is outside of
the kind of a awareness, let's say, of, of the reality
of what other states are doing.
There's a way, there's a, there's a level
of like forced accountability
that can happen through this process.
But we must realize that this whole thing has been
weaponized against sovereignty for a very long time.
Now, it doesn't mean it can't work in,
in positive ways like I think we're seeing here,
but it still worries me the whole thing, the idea of the UN
and the WHO and what they actually do
very much concerns me just to make sure we're clear on that.
But it doesn't mean we should ignore the positive steps
that are taken in a system that doesn't seem to want
to remove what this is.
And it says US Law indeed
and doesn't mean we should stop trying.
By the way, US Law indeed requires
that the US defund global institutions
that admit Palestine as a member, right?
So think about that, which tells you everything you need
to know about the USS actual
commitment to this two state solution.
They're, they're making sure it never happens.
It says, so we're likely on the eve of another major battle
between the rules based international order,
which is the exact opposite of that,
and international law where the US might as insane
as it sounds, choose to defund the United Nations.
Which again, it's an interesting issue right there, right?
Because I'm not necessarily gonna be against that.
But the problem is that all it's gonna be, it's,
it's if you're, if you have a body like that that exists,
that doesn't go away.
If the, if the United States is not a part of it,
well that's a problem, right?
But the idea is that this is something
that is at the very least changed that the problem is
that if the US just starts, starts to defund the un,
it's gonna act like anything that's done there.
Which by the way, they don't care anyway,
I was gonna say, doesn't matter to them.
There's no influence over what they do.
It's a very complicated situation.
The bottom line is that what the US
and Israel are doing are egregiously, immoral, unjust,
and in and illegal.
And so if this is the only way we can apply pressure
to these authoritarian seemingly unaccountable states,
then I support that.
Now it passed, the UN assembly approves the resolution
to grant Palestine new rights.
Now it says the un generally GE general Assembly voted
by a wide margin, which is completely expected.
This was today to grant new rights
and privileges to Palestine
and called on the Security Council
to favorably reconsider its request
to become the hundred 94th member of the United Nations.
I guarantee you they're gonna veto this in
the security council anyway.
Now, if they don't, that would be very interesting
because that would, that would at least be a huge statement
against, I mean, that would show you
that the United States has recognized
that the juice is just no longer worth the squeeze.
We cannot do this anymore.
Which I still, I find it hard to believe that they,
if they waited this long, I don't see why they would wait.
One, they would, they'll veto this as well.
It says the United States vetoed a widely backed council
resolution on April 18th that would have paved the way
for a full United Nations membership for Palestine.
Now, here's the main thing that they're claiming.
Ambassador Robert Wood said this.
He says, we've been very clear from the beginning there
as a process for obtaining full
membership of the United Nations.
You know, the process, they keep vetoing and,
and this effort by some of the Arab countries
and the Palestinians is trying to go around this.
Well, okay, so explain for me, this is like claiming that
legal arm resistance
or even the BDS movement is somehow a problem when all
you're doing is saying you can't
do this, so do it the right way.
And they go through some legal channel
and you go, that's also terrorism.
The point is, you're just, nothing is acceptable.
So if you're going, you have to go this way
and you built a hundred foot wall on
that road, where are they?
So if they try to go around
that road, suddenly they're criminals.
You are the one that's stopping them from going this route
that you claim is the only way they should be going.
Isn't that ridiculous? And he says,
we said from the beginning, the best way
to ensure their full membership is to do through, do so
with negotiations with Israel.
Of course, you mean the state
that is sworn like a death oath
that they'll never allow this to happen.
And they've been saying this for years, for decades.
It's just that nobody was listening
and now finally they're listening to them
and they're just screaming at the top of their lungs.
We'll never allow this. And by the way, they're saying,
why would we ever allow that?
Which you should listen to
because that means they've never,
ever been honest about actually wanting that.
Because that's the same argument. Very important to see.
So this is gonna change things, guys.
I promise you this will change, change things.
It's just about whether it will actually have enough
influence to stop what's going on in real time.
Because that's the hardest thing I have with all this.
People are dying as we talk right now.
People are starving to death. People are dying of thirst.
Children are having their limbs blown off.
Pregnant women are having baby.
I mean, it's just over and over and over.
And it's ongoing right this moment.
The amount of children that die every single
day is overwhelming.
We're gonna talk about some of that now.
Make sure you stay till to the end, by the way,
because the discussion about the smart city will
be the last segment we discuss.
It's important actually. 'cause I think this is a really
alarming, it's not new by any start to the imagination.
It's not a new plan even,
but it's, it's interesting that it's now being rolled out
and Netanyahu is openly considering this.
We'll get to that. Now, I wanna start
with an interesting point in regard to the campus protest
and really more so, not
so much about the campus protest ex in particular,
but what's been doing, what's been done around it.
And a couple of points about what's going on.
But I think this is fascinating.
We saw the anti, the combating antisemitism bill, right?
And I don't know why it's so hard for people in the paradigm
to recognize and both left and right by the way.
So there's support on all sides of this.
But I think our predominantly,
I think there's more resistance quite frankly.
But overall, I think that what's clear is that this is
shockingly unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional. There's just no way around it.
We're talking about people expressing the way they see
things, the way they feel, the way they think.
There's no way that that is somehow a crime.
You can't say, well, if you say this about
Israel, that's against the law.
What you're doing is criminalizing speech.
I mean, this is not hard to understand.
Here's Jonas Westerberg pointing out the Israeli American
counseled attorney, who is the best described architect
behind the antisemitism laws,
calls himself the chief pest control officer.
Isn't that like, I mean, the idea of these overlaps
where we were told, you know, when like call,
like when regard to the Nazi conversation of Jews
and the vermin and the con and the terms
and the buzzwords that we're always talking about, how
almost ubiquitously we have seen the same language,
the same framing, the same actions currently been done
by Zionists in regard to Palestinians.
I've shown you the images of Elon Levy and Eli David for,
and showing Palestinians as rats and,
and I mean I almost identical propaganda from
what the Nazis did about Jews.
And how do you even do that
as a Jewish person while claiming
that it's about defending yourselves against Nazi.
I mean crazy because these are bad, bad people guys.
And remember historically that aligned themselves
with Nazi Germany even after the final solution.
That's the Lehigh party. That's part, that's the one
of the founding elements of Zionism.
And since I mentioned that, I'll
include this so you guys can read it.
Remember this is from a Hart's article
that explicitly discusses this
ZR Zetler's interrogation occurred about two weeks
after the one C conference in Berlin,
in which Nazi officials discuss the
implementation of the final solution.
And the point is, this article is discussing the reality
that these, the Zionist organization was
aligning itself with Nazi Germany.
It's an important thing to realize.
Now, back to the point on this,
it's another example of this.
You have somebody who is a proud Zionist, a proud supporter
of Israel that is openly saying he's the chief pest control
officer in regard to CR as he writes.
And this is the ar the actual article itself.
Zionist, billionaire and Israeli government
behind antisemitism laws, which they're proudly discussing.
Guys, it's an open why? Because we're stopping racism.
Well, or you can more aptly understand
that even if you think that's what they're doing,
which it's not, it's creating racism.
You can recognize these are foreign entities dictating
what Americans can say.
How is anybody that swore oath the constitution,
anybody in Congress, anybody who is even fighting
for Americans pretending this is okay.
I don't care what you're talking about.
I don't care if you're literally passing
a law that says you can't.
I mean, take the worst thing you think you can say
specifically and in open hatred of Jewish people.
I would call you a the disgusting person for saying it,
but I would fight for your right to be able to express it
because that's absolute free speech.
Or really just free speech.
We don't need to add absolute to it.
'cause free speech means free speech.
It's not free speech with limits,
which is what they're trying to do.
So it's terrifying to me that these are being,
this is being supported by Republicans
who 30 seconds ago were screaming about woke politics
and identity politics censoring you for your speech.
And yet because it's something
they don't like, suddenly it's okay.
Now, clearly, if you see my last show is,
I'm not even talking about the majority, quite frankly,
I think the majority of conservatives are seeing this
and are, are, are uncomfortable by this
because they do see an issue
with the woke politics, which I do as well.
And I've called it out many times.
But recognize the contradiction
because they're not ridiculous, they're not stupid.
They recognize it
and they're going, oh, hold on, I'm,
am I being tricked into supporting what I was just saying?
I should, yes, but good on
you for seeing it and calling it out.
'cause I see a lot of conservatives doing
that same thing in reverse.
A lot of, of, of Democrats or, or,
or liberals out there supporting
and fighting against the gen supporting
both Jewish Christian Muslims, anybody fighting
for a ceasefire and calling out what's happening.
But you see a lot of these people in central positions
of power who are supporting it and they're calling it out
and they're doing the same kind of thing.
But the bottom line is that this is alarming
because they're censoring your
speech from a government position.
Oh, and by the way, here's just the
account itself, so you can see it.
Chief pest control Officer.
Now re just my point in all this
and that is to recognize just obviously that the claim, so
what you're, what you're, what you, you're doing.
If you're calling out Zionism, you know you're a pest
and he's a pest control.
So how do you not take that as what it sounds like?
But any case, they're proudly telling you that we're
behind this and that we're gonna censor you.
And that's okay. And you know why?
Because a censor band pointed out,
and we've played this for you before, here's an old clip in,
in Hebrews speaking with a reporter
where Netanyahu openly admits both,
and by the way, calling it the Jewish lobby at the time,
and very clearly discusses the reality that they control,
or at the very least are not worried about it
because they completely influence the US Congress.
And don't forget, we just talked about Donald Trump openly
admitting that Congress is controlled by Israel,
or it was, and it should be.
He says rightly so and says that
because it's not right now because of Joe Biden.
Remember we just played that clip on the show
that's terrifying that a person is about to be president.
'cause I think that's who's the next selection we've already
talked about that is openly saying
that Israel should have control over the US Congress.
There's no way to misunderstand what he said, guys, he said,
and rightly so, and Biden has been the reason they don't,
it was very clear and explicit.
And here's the point. Netanyahu in the eighties brags about
how the Jewish lobby controls America.
He says, we own the Senate, the Congress,
and we have a strong record,
strong Jewish lobby on our side.
We have a strong influence over the general support.
America won't force us into anything.
Well, it's starting to change. The reporter simply says,
in the 1980s, we don't have America with us.
Nya responds. USA is not a unified block there.
So that point is to recognize that he's,
what he's discussing is the using the division
between politics to party illusion, guys.
It's divide and conquer. That's what we're talking about.
He says, we have the Senate, the Congress,
and a strong, a record strong Jewish block or Jewish lobby.
And he says we have, uh, next, he says,
we have a strong influence over
the general support in America.
America won't force us into anything.
I don't know why that's not terrifying to people.
I don't care whether this was a Jewish Persian, a Muslim,
a Christian from somebody from the uk, from Berlin,
from Germany, from Israel.
I don't, it's it's a foreign entity proudly telling you
that they can control what we do in this country.
I don't care. And again, it's not even about America.
I don't if I was in any country.
It's about foreign entities influencing policy
that affects your lives for their interest at your expense.
It's obvious. And just one more point on this,
and we keep bringing this bell
because it's also something people are waking up to.
Thomas Massey rightly calling this out.
It says APAC super Pac set
to run TV ads blasting Thomas Massey real record.
Gee, I wonder why.
And he says, the day after he votes
for Speaker Johnson APAC votes against Speaker Johnson
for obvious reasons, because the guy's a
wildly pro Zionist maniac.
In my opinion, APAC announces a 3,000 thousand
dollars ad buy against him.
I hope Americans see what's happening here.
Now realize guys, we just made this point
and I made this point on a recent show I was on as well.
Well, here, here's what we're talking about.
If you don't remember the idea of lobbying in general,
what they claim it's supposed to be, they swear up and down.
It's not bribery. We're just, we're just funding groups
that, you know, political campaigns that we support
the game is that we don't, you know,
immediately dictate what happens.
We just give them money
and we hope they are the person that we just wanna support.
And then next time the election comes around,
if we don't like what they've done,
maybe we won't find them that time.
That's supposed to be the lie about lobbying.
No, that's not what happens. As APAC just proved immediately
after a vote on the emergency Israel bill, the Republicans
that did not vote for it, APAC yanked certain funding.
How do you not take that as APAC immediately
influencing the outcome of policy?
That's supposed to be the biggest over that's, that is
what they swear lobbying is not doing,
even though we all know it is.
So here's another example where there immediately
after choices, he was, he, this is supposed
to be a representative American interest.
He's supposed to be, and I don't agree with any of this,
but he's supposed to be the living embodiment
of the will of his constituents, right?
So what APAC is doing is going well, we don't care
what you think, we want you to vote the way we want you to.
And if you don't, we're gonna pay half a million dollars
to have some kind of a taken on you.
We're gonna pull funding for you. That's terrifying.
No matter what entity, no matter what group it comes from,
no matter what interest it support, this is a lobbying group
in interest of a foreign country
who is influencing the outcome in real time
of policy in this country at the expense of Americans.
It's not an Amer, they, they're
trying to pretend to be a US group.
It's very clearly in the interest of a foreign country
and it's no way around it.
Now let's talk about the campus protest in that regard
and how, first of all, just to see that this hasn't stopped,
it's gone global as we just talked about recently.
It is a global effort that's not woke left politics
and George SOLs and CIA like Alex Jones would tell you,
is it it we should very genuinely
always consider that influence.
It's don't forget we talked about the funding.
Derek Rose wrote a great article
for on unconscious resistance.
The point being that the only thing I can prove, which is
what we should care about, is a funding
that took place from 2019 2021 for a fraction of
what they're using today to one of the groups.
And there are many groups on multiple group areas.
And, and again, it goes, it's global at this point.
There are people in Japan and Germany
and all over the world now doing these in their own ways.
And to just wash that away as all CIA
and George Soros, which in which, you know,
of all people I'm the, I'm immediately looking
for things like that, the hallmarks
of CIA national down for democracy, whatever.
But as far as I can tell, this is not what's happening.
And I'm always gonna be on guard for that.
And we, what we're seeing is a massive movement,
which I can guarantee you is
already trying to be influenced.
And I made this point, every time either side
of anything important going on, you will find people trying
to fund it, trying to influence it, trying to co-opt it.
Again, I make the point they make about the Occupy Wall
Street movement, which by the way,
this feels very reminiscent of.
It was very clearly something that was an organic thing
that started, and you, and we can prove
because this later came out that there was an FBI entity
that rose to the top of this
and kind of drove the whole damn thing to the ground,
made it look like some ridiculous carnival as opposed
to the real thing that it began as just trying
to raise awareness about the obvious problems
that be obviously, you know, 2008
and everything else, it's very clear
that these groups were criminals.
But my point is, this is what we're dealing with again,
that we have very clear groups
that have learned lessons from the sixties movement from the
Vietnam protest from apartheid, you know, very clearly
realizing that if we talk to the media of any kind that,
that we could be misrepresented.
It's about trying to raise the
awareness about the one issue.
Bottom line, you should consider what they're saying.
Don't blindly support
or blindly follow anything, question everything.
Consider all possibilities. But if you can't see at this
point that what we're, what this is drawing attention
to is the most obvious crime taking
place in the planet right now.
Which is no way to diminish other very serious crimes going
on like in the Congo or Myanmar or anywhere else.
It's just to recognize that this is the most obvious
and most central point
that is truly de un decoupled,
unraveling their entire control over all the rest
of those stories and their involvement in those as well,
like Israel and the United States
that we have proven in places like Congo, for example,
in regard to the diamond, uh, in regard to the
diamond trade in regard to mining of rare earth minerals
and all these different things.
But back to this point, breaking through news highlights
that M-I-T-M-I-T students are,
and grad workers have maintained an hours long picket
despite brutal rest, as you can see in the image,
cops just randomly pushing students, which was crazy to me,
have maintained hours long picket despite brutal rest at the
university building that ha a university building
that houses an $11 million Israeli drone project.
Why in the world are these colleges even
invested in foreign policy merchants of death?
I don't understand that. I mean, I do,
but it shouldn't be the case.
Now they speak with the president of MIT grad Union.
You can listen for yourself. This is ongoing is the point.
Now here's, here's something that Kaitlyn Johnstone said,
and I find this to be really interesting,
a recent discussion between Blinken
and, uh, what was his name again?
We just talked about him. Um, it was, he's the Palantir guy.
Uh, Ash, uh, what was his name?
That wasn't his name, was it? Yeah.
Lemme just read through it. Oh, Kap Kap was his name.
CEO of Palantir Palantir.
And the point is that they're sitting there having this
conversation about why the protest movement is a problem.
As she writes, empire managers explain why this new protest
movement scares them and,
and honest, a weirdly honest moment.
And I don't think they meant it that way.
The US Secretary of State
and a builder Bilderberg surveillance tech oligarch have
both made some very interesting admissions about the
burgeoning protest movement against the US back slaughter
and Gaza and the problems it poses
for the empire they help run.
It says during a vitriolic rant about university
demonstrators at the Ash Carter Exchange on innovation
and national security on Tuesday, Palantir, CEO, Alex Karp,
who don't forget, is acutely involved with Israel in regard
to funding using AI processes.
Actually I think I can pull that, that, uh,
yep, right there or no, that's, is that the one,
this is an older article I think,
but we recently covered up pal Palantir investing in what's
going on in Israel.
Just this one we talked about recently.
The PayPal offshoot becomes a weapon in the war against
whistleblowers or anything
that we're doing that they don't like.
Uh, let's do this. Oh, this one. Here we go.
This I, we wrote about it in the, in the website as well,
but this is just the, this
discussion so you can look at it for yourself.
Bloomberg article, Palantir and Israel agree.
If it'll load for me
- .
- Okay, I guess we'll come back to it.
So the point is that they are working
with Israel and that's provable.
We'll show you the article once it loads in five years.
It says Carp is a billionaire
who sits on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group
and regularly features at the World Economic Forum
and other platforms of Plutocratic Empire Management.
He says quote, we kind of just think these things
that are happening across college
campuses especially are like a sideshow.
No, they are the show carp said during his rant.
Because if we lose the intellectual debate, not
that they're lying, but if we lose the debate,
you will not be able to deploy any army in the west, ever.
So your argument is that these people calling out genocide
stops you from being able to
deploy military around the world.
Yeah, maybe we should not want that. And here's the point.
Thiel's Palantir Israel agree strategic
partnership for battle tech.
Not surprising as they're openly
murdering children right now with this tech.
Maybe they're uncomfortable,
but it says everyone should listen very carefully
to carps words here because he's giving the whole game away.
He's making it very clear how crucial it is for the empire
to stomp out this protest movement
and the zeitgeist upon which it rides zeitgeist,
meaning just a term meaning kind of the, the spirit
of an age, which I do
agree that's kind of what's happening here.
It says at a time when most imperial spinmeisters are trying
to dismiss the importance of this movement
and what young people are doing on college campuses
around the world at,
at this is a really extraordinary admission from someone
who lives deep in the guts of the imperial hydra.
Such conferences are great for obtaining
and useful information from swamp
monsters that you don't normally hear.
Where was that? But because when they're sounding surrounded
by like-minded empire goons, they tend
to get a lot more loose tongue.
I agree with that. Then they are, when they're more aware
that you're, you have an audience of normal people there.
I think in historically too. They've been, you very used
to these things not becoming so prominent
because they're in these special group, you know,
today things are very different
and some of 'em haven't caught.
Like, you know, when there was the police accountability,
the police cams, remember there was like a 10 year period,
which still it happens by the way,
where they would like catch themselves planting drugs
with their, their cop cameras.
You know, like the, the point was
that they didn't just stop even though they knew it was
there because they were so used
to being able to get away with everything.
That's the kind of same thing we're seeing here.
And it is slowly becoming less common
because there we're continually catching
them with all these crazy things.
But it says, we saw this illustrated again in a conversation
between Senator Mi Mitt Romney
and Secretary of State blinken at the McCain Institute,
and I just played that for you during which both
acknowledged some facts that generally go unstated
by such creatures.
After bemoaning Israel's lack of success at PR
regarding the Gaza assault, Omni just came right out
and said that this was why there was such overwhelming
support for us to shut down potentially TikTok
or other entities of that nature
with quote us meaning himself
and his fellow lawmakers on Capitol Hill
and says quote, how this narrative has evolved.
Yeah, it's a great question.
Uh, Blinken responded saying at, at the beginning
of his career in Washington,
everyone was getting their information from television
and physical newspapers.
And he says, now of course they're on an intravenous feed
of information with new impulses,
inputs every millisecond, right?
Like God forbid they should be informed before you are.
And this is of course the way
that this has played out on social media
has dominated the narrative.
None of them really say fake news, do they?
It says, and you have a social media ecosystem environment
in which context history facts get lost.
And the emotion right there, you could argue,
but he says the impact of images dominates, right?
So he was all, he says, facts get lost.
He's not really saying that these images are fake.
And the point is, we know that they're not.
You could argue some
of them have been predominantly
coming from a Zionist position.
I've clearly proven that.
But overall you can see plenty of things.
But my point is that they're highlighting
that the information they're seeing is,
is changing the dynamic.
And that's clear. That's why that's undeniable.
They wanna censor because they're losing
control of the narrative.
It says, and we can't, we can't discount that.
But I think it's also very, very,
very challenging effect on the narrative.
Exactly. He literally said the narrative, notice
how he said the word narrative three times.
That's how empire managers talk to each other
because that's how they think about everything.
This is because empire managers are always acutely aware
of something that normal human beings are not.
That real power comes from manipulating the stories,
the narratives that people tell
themselves about their reality.
They understand that humans are storytelling animals whose
inner lives are typically dominated
by mental narratives about what's happening.
So if you can control those
narratives, you can control the humans.
They understand that power is controlling what happens not,
but true power is controlling
what people think about what happens.
They understand that whoever controls the
narrative controls the world.
That's why what's going on
with all the mass media propaganda,
Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation,
plutocrat funded think tanks
and mainstream culture manufacturing in New York
and Hollywood, A few clever manipulations understand
manipulators understand that you can control a society
by controlling its dominant narratives.
Our rulers don't think about these things like
normal people think about them.
They don't think in terms of doing the right thing
or acting in a way that benefits everyone as much
as they love to pretend that because that's what you want
point, Caitlin makes all the time.
They don't think in terms of truth
and honesty or lack thereof.
They only think in terms of
what stories people are telling each other
and how these stories can be changed in a way
that advances the interest
of the empire they manage post-truth world.
I'll just leave it there 'cause I
want to make sure we get to the rest of this.
But it's important to think about that.
Now this is an interesting point on this.
Here's Wyatt Reed just highlighting exactly
what she was showing, the hypocrisy of all of this.
He says, we are governed by absolute psychopaths.
No real principles, no moral consistency,
just constant shameless hypocrisy every day
over and over again.
Remember the Hong Kong protests,
the Hong Kong campus protests.
Remember that 2019, here's
what Senator Marshall Blackburn said.
It is unacceptable for the Hong Kong police force
to require the arrest of all on campus protestors in a bid
to deescalate the violence.
This is not how a free and fair government acts.
It is how a police state operates.
Oh, isn't that interesting? Here's what she says today.
Reports indicate
that leftists are joining pro Hamas protests.
See, they just go all the pro Hamas. You mean pro-Palestine?
You guys are ridiculous cartoon cutouts.
He says their goal is to spread disorder
and violence on campuses
and in advance their liberal agenda.
These are not peaceful protestors,
they are terrorists, sympathized or calling.
They were just directly Zionist talking points.
She got, somebody wrote this for her for all I can tell.
So wait a minute, but so it's it's not okay
for Hong Kong in the same context with violence
to shut down all of them ubiquitously,
like they're all doing the same thing.
Yeah, because that would be stupid.
Here you are promoting that very stupid thing.
So Senator Marsha Blackburn is
stupid or however you wanna frame that.
Tom Cotton, another one. You know very well.
Hong Kong's authorities have turned a place
of higher learning into a place of violence
by trapping student demonstrators on their own campuses.
Gasp. How dare they? What a police state.
Oh, here he is over here. If the campus police can't do it,
the school should bring in local police.
If the local police can't do it, then yes,
the National Guard should resort, should restore law
and order, allowing deeply troubling antisemites
to take over campuses and
they're threatened Jewish students.
None of which is happening by the way.
'cause we've proven to you as everybody can see
with a brain, that the most
of these protests are being put on by Jewish organizations.
Some, yeah. Some of them are predominantly Jewish.
Or the very least you can show a huge Jewish presence
and you can see Holocaust survivors openly talking about
how they support what's going on.
Isn't that funny how we can just pretend they're Jew hating,
antisemite pro Hamas rape, blah, blah, blah.
These people are children.
And here's the worst part about it.
People like Tom Cotton guys, they know they're lying.
That's the biggest issue.
And Josh Haley and the rest,
they know they're lying about this.
Now I would, you could argue that maybe they believe
the lie about some rising antisemitism threat.
And so they justify lying about these people
because they see it, but whatever.
But they, I, they know what they're saying is not true
because it's been dumped in front
of them by a thousand different people.
Yet they still do it. 'cause they're not honest guys.
They don't care about any
of the things they pretend they care about.
Here's one of these examples I've played before
- As a Holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protestors in America is
just keep doing it.
Don't give up. We are doing exactly the same.
And in the long term we are going to prevail.
I'm out from the beginning at every march,
a small group of survivor
- And he's wearing the traditional Palestinian garb that'll
be relevant in a minute when they pretend that
that's now the new KKK symbol.
That's not a joke. That's
what Israeli government representatives are claiming
that a Palestinian garb
is now KKK level despite the fact that it's being worn
by Jews and Holocaust survivors.
And they'll never call that out though
because it'll make them Look, you'll never, I I've never
yet seen any of these Zionists go as far as
to call a Holocaust survivor.
A token Jew or a Jew, a self hating Jew.
You'll see them do that to just any Jew
that supports what's going on like Ben Shapiro.
'cause they're disgusting people that don't care about
anything but Zionism, but they're coward enough
to not call out the Holocaust survivors.
And you know, damn well why?
But doesn't that show you everything?
Here's another example. Um,
- This is the first time I am using my full, real name, um,
to stand in solidarity with Palestinians.
And I, I don't deserve applause
because I am too late.
Um, because every single day that we don't speak out
as Jews in support of Palestinian liberation
is another day too late.
Um, I grew up in a Jewish American school system
that was explicitly Zionist.
- That was the point. Sorry,
I dunno if you heard, oh, I guess it was muted.
I dropped my microphone there. I was stumbling
around didn't need to tell you that.
So point being, these people are lying to you
and they know they're lying and, and,
and not even worse, they're directly contradicting this,
this something they was said in the same context
before, which shows you that it really comes down
to whatever the narrative is, whatever the agenda is,
they have nothing sacred.
They don't have anything they care about.
They will, they'll lie.
I mean this, this the kind of thing you say about a thief,
you know, they would steal, they would kill
their mother for $5.
You know, whatever the claim that the statement is I've
heard before about, you know, the point is people are
so shameless that nothing really matters.
You will sell out things you claim you fight
for in order to make a narrative point.
Here's Josh Hawley, one
of the worst in Hong Kong government police continue their
assault on universities into the night making mass arrests
and now threatening life fire against
largely defensive students.
Doesn't this sound exactly? Yes.
It's the same damn thing Beijing is pushing
Hong Kong to a state of siege.
Now, let's not forget, you can prove
that there was still an A presence, a CIA presence,
a manipulation going on in Hong Kong.
We proved to you that there were CIA elements
that were there on camera speaking
to a leader of this group.
That doesn't change the point. It's, it's always happening.
And we shouldn't blindly believe
that the protests are organic in any Kirk
circumstance, even this.
But I think the point is, unless you can prove they're not,
you shouldn't blindly assume they are.
My point is, in this case,
you could see very clearly they were caught either way,
it's because it was their agenda.
They wanted to point at it
because they wanted to use this against China.
They were like, there support them
and how dare you, free speech and blah, blah, blah.
But over here it doesn't matter.
And yet the worst part over here,
you're talking about supporting Hong Kong over here you're
talking about supporting Americans.
These are us politicians
that are supporting foreign go entities when it matters.
And ignoring us interest when it matters.
That's what they care about themselves.
Oh, here's another example. You know,
so we're talking about Americans, right?
And protestors in the United States re uh,
using free speech, talking whether you agree
with what they have to say or not.
And the proof that we've gone over countless times of
how constantly they're lied about
how constantly people are initiating violence,
then pretending it was a,
it's very clear they've been lied about left, right, and up.
And we're gonna show you an important clip about that
where Stef, who seems like this belligerent maniac
around this topic, who seemed
to think she's gonna gain something by lying about all this,
was called out in the middle of Congress
by the very person investigating this,
that the claim she says didn't even happen.
That's my point. But while that's going on,
while they're going pro Hamas pro rape to American students
who don't even think that GOP congressman offers a solution,
send them to Gaza.
These are American politicians
who are threatening even in a, if you,
even if you wanna pretend it's a joke
or making a point, you are threatening to send Americans
to Gaza, which is currently in the middle of a genocide
because they disagree with what you think they should think.
I mean is, I mean, this is the whole point about realizing
the central concepts of what we call America
they don't care about and maybe have never even been real
in the minds of these people.
That should be terrifying.
Here's what Katie Helper writes,
and as she writes that, her name is now Katie Helper is a
Jew for ceasefire, right?
And she says, please put clips
of Zionist protestors committing violence
and engaging in hate speech
and police violence against pro-Palestine protestors below.
Thank you.
Twitter is so messed up, I'm telling you.
But the point is, take a look.
I I too much to go through all of it,
but it's, it's shocking here.
Here's a Zionist person that spits on a black child.
I mean, I would argue that, I don't mean that they meant
to spit on that one black child,
but you can see where they get confronted down here
and the, you know, she's like, I am sorry, I didn't mean to.
The point is that this is the kind of stuff
that keeps happening, right?
Or these people laughing at a sitin protest where they're,
they're protesting for dead Palestinians
or getting into like the violent aspects where you can prove
that they're the ones pretending,
oh, you hit me with your flag.
Like, oh, it's constant.
And there's much worse examples as we've gone through.
And there's ones that we're gonna show you next,
which are very important.
But the point is, this thread goes on forever
and it's all about post-OC October 7th Zionist aggression
against peaceful protesters and Palestinians.
Zachary Foster highlights,
this is an author, his name is Nathan.
Nathan Thrall has won the Pulitzer Prize
for his book on the Israeli occupation.
'cause that's what it's, but he has repeatedly had his
events canceled in the US and Germany.
He says it's rooted in the fear
of being the labeled antisemitic, which is exactly how
that's supposed to work for entirely
legitimate criticism of Israel.
As Zachary Foster writes, which by the way,
we just had an amazing interview with him again,
that'll be the second one I'm going
likely play in that tomorrow.
He wrote, imagine if Pulitzer Prize winning author,
which is very interesting to me, that that's the case
because you can't pretend it's, you know,
some fringe crazy racist when this is a Pulitzer Prize
winning author for the work that they're calling racist.
Imagine if Pulitzer Prize winning author
of a book about anti-Semitism
or anti-Jewish rims had their event canceled.
Everyone would be screaming antisemitism.
But because the book is about Israeli occupation
and apartheid, no one even blinks.
It's just, it's double standards all over the place.
And we know that most everyone in the world can now see it.
Francesca Albany makes an important point here.
Laura Friedman writes, Knesset committee warned
us campus riots quote, direct threat to Israel.
Your damn right. They are just not the way they're claiming.
These are a direct threat
to their control over the narrative.
These protests are a direct threat to the US
and Israel's control over all sorts
of foreign policy manipulations, they're a direct threat
to their ongoing genocide.
That's what they're scared of is getting.
Because once this goes away,
they're especially net inya guys.
This is over for them. Frankly.
I think that's the case regardless.
And that's not an unique opinion,
but they says, they say quote,
we cannot accept statements like get this
Israel's an apartheid state, or Israel's an occupying state.
Like they're so desperate
that they're falling back on the most
provable examples of everything.
And we're supposed to pretend
that acknowledging provable international
realities is racism.
Well, yeah, that's their whole shtick, guys, you're a racist
by pointing out that they killed that person right there.
'cause you hate Jews. No, I'm just pointing out
that the IDF member shot a child.
But you know, you do, you, it's just
crazy and everyone's falling.
It's become obvious.
Here's what she riots un special repertoire
says Israel does occupy the West Bank,
including East Jerusalem and the gods a strip.
It does and it does it brutally.
It's a, it's a, it's a lockstep reality across anybody,
any standing in the international community
and anybody with a brain that can
clearly see that's the reality.
And they've just lied about it, like lies
that Palestine never existed or they're all terrorists.
Somehow it's ridiculous.
And you get the ridiculous people like Laura Loomer
that will push this stuff because they're ridiculous
because they are all about an agenda.
She also writes, does Israel does practice apartheid.
It has two legal systems, civil law
for Israeli settlers illegally residing in occupied
territories, which by the way, nobody says is not illegal
of the Israel and martial law for the Palestinians.
It has used for decades
to forcibly displace Palestinians while taking
their land and resources.
Does the Israeli Knesset expect western countries
to curtail constitutionally guaranteed freedoms
of expression and assembly
or the right to protest so as not
to scrutinize Israel's international wrongdoings?
And how about the point that we know there are American
Palestinians that live in Gaza?
What about that American government?
You don't care about your own Americans being your
American citizens being treated this way.
Of course they don't because they don't care now
as they're being bombed to death
or Israel doesn't care about their
own people that are currently there.
And by the way, Americans are no more important than the
other person that's being killed right there.
It's simply to highlight the government of the United States
who at least pretends
to care more about its American citizens,
but does not clearly.
But here's the point in all of that, guys,
these are provable obvious realities.
Oh, and on before I show you that again, this is the point.
Biden is so senile at this point
and so completely lost that he says things
that I think are gaffes all the time
that most people don't pick up on.
So SF MD points out, Biden was speaking with CNN
and he goes, I told Bibe who, who's gonna occupy Gaza after?
Oops. Right? I mean, help the government elect itself.
This is so stupid. The whole point is we're not supposed
to admit that this occupied, that's the lie
that they want you to think is a lie, right?
It's not. It's obvious. It is occupied,
it has been all of Palestine.
If you actually read all the UN documents, it's
'cause the truth is occupied.
It's obvious. Gaza, the West Bank are the last remnants of
what they claim are still Palestinian.
Even though they're manipulating all of these as well.
They're occupied, but he's arguing who's gonna occupy it
Now, that's the whole point As he writes,
no one should occupy Gaza.
The Palestinian people are not animals
for everyone else to Lord over.
This is exactly the thinking
that has gotten us to this point.
Biden just clumsily said that
because he's trying to act like he cares about the the
outcome about the people.
But the real point is, yeah, who is gonna occupy it?
How about if you wanna pretend that they're supposed
to be able to govern themselves, that they're supposed
to be a self-determination concept that you don't ask
who is going to control their lives going forward.
But that's always been the reality.
And in case you needed to see it again, not
that we should blindly trust any one entity,
but how about we at least give credence to the idea
that literally every meaningful human rights group on the
planet has acknowledged that Israel's an apartheid state.
And don't forget that just like South Africa
or just like any number of realities in the past,
it was resisted to the death to teeth, tooth
and nail until it was forced.
Don't don't forget, Israel was immersed in the South
African's apartheid conversation.
That's why it was happening in my opinion, as well
as the ethnic weapons they were working on,
which is not a secret, despite the fact like
so many truths, it's disregarded.
The point is, it's obvious that this is the truth.
And they will never admit that in 2021, human rights watch
a threshold crossed Israeli authorities
and the crimes of apartheid prosecution or persecution.
Here's Amnesty International Israel's Apartheid against
Palestinians 2022.
Here's Beth Selem, an Israeli human rights group
as they write a regime
of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea.
This is apartheid.
Here is Zachary Foster who highlights again the point
that we're making literally everybody
with any standing in this conversation,
and we're supposed to blindly trust the person pretending
they're not apartheid and the governments
that blindly support them, or rather the politicians.
That's ignorance. Guys.
You're ignoring provable history and everybody they
otherwise tell you to look to for this information
as he writes, every single one of these groups,
I mean, you could look for yourself for the podcast.
What's that? 14 of them.
And it's all, it's the United Nations.
Uh, I mean, you know, Dawn Menna, all these groups
that have a standing in this human rights watch.
Uh, this one is, uh, yesin.
This is the, uh, United Nations Economic
and Social Comm, uh, commission for Western.
I mean, you see the point. It's, it's apartheid.
It's apartheid, it's apartheid. 2010 2017. 2020 2021.
Everybody acknowledges this.
But here is we live on planet Mars. The, the JNS.
We cannot accept statements like
Israel's an apartheid state.
That's what we were just pointing to. So they just can't
accept the provable reality.
Now here I think is important in regard
to the resistance of all this.
'cause that's what we're actually watching here, guys.
We're watching the resistance movement,
whether they're wrong about everything else
or whether they're being paid to be there.
The point is that what is coming about,
I think we've discussed the payment part,
that it's actually completely baseless other than things
that don't relate to what's happening
now, but, but still might be.
And we should consider that until you have more
evidence, that's where we have to leave it.
The reality that what we're seeing as a result
of what's happening is powerful.
It is resistance and it's literally
changing what they're able to do.
It's literally driving politicians
to change their narratives.
Guys, that's real change, at least in the moment.
And we have to try to use that.
We have to try to lean into that.
But here's what, uh, censored man shared this,
and I'm not sure who this person was,
but he just is excellently put.
And I agree the idea that, you know, we love to be a part
of the resistance when it comes to our movies.
But when finally comes time for a real resistance,
guess where we ended up?
We do the next
- Watch The Hunger Games, and you sided with the resistance.
You watched Star Wars and you sided with the resistance.
You watched the Matrix and you understood
and sided with the resistance.
You watched the movie Divergent
and you sided with the resistance.
You watched V for vendetta
and you cheered on the resistance.
When it's fiction, you understand
and you side with the resistance.
Yet when it's happening
to you in real life right now in the news,
in the world right now, you refuse to see it
When it's the reality that you are living it, you're afraid
to resist in real life, blows my mind.
- Truly. I mean that, that's the sad reality about it.
And realize that there's not every resistance act
is violence, right?
Even though there are actual provable legal are acts
of armed resistance when you're in occupied territory
fighting against a military force, legal acts
of armed resistance per the fortune of a convention.
That's what we're talking about. Not
that there were also crimes that were committed as we keep,
I love I keep getting into this dynamic,
which I think I find entertaining.
'cause my interesting position on this when it comes
to dealing with these Zionists bots and li
and people that blindly buy their narratives online, is
that they always argue with
what they think you're gonna say.
They argue with what the
presentation is of what they think I am.
Then pro Hamas, Hey, hate Jews
and all these different narratives they
spin, none of which are true.
I mean, I've been very clear. I don't support 'em.
How could, how would I support a group
that I'm not even sure is, is truly influe is fighting
for only Palestine as we know that they've been funded up
until very recently, if not still by Israel.
That's a whole dynamic that makes me very
clearly concerned about that.
So I don't support anything
that I feel like might be some kind of surreptitious idea.
I support the act of arm resistance
by literally anybody fighting for Palestine in a,
in the sense of doing so legally.
And also the acts that were carried on October 7th,
you can prove there were some crimes
committed that's reality.
And that that's what's funny is they come, they go,
you support Hamas, you hate you.
It's like, no, you're wrong. You just assume into
what you think is the reality.
The point though is that you can clearly see
that whether you support that group, right, is
that we're in the middle of a very real act of resistance
and that they have that right as well
as any other resistance group.
And that people just seem sh you know, gun shy with this,
to use a bad analogy in this case.
Like just afraid to lean into what's really happening
because I mean, obviously you're afraid
you're gonna called an antisemite.
You're afraid you're gonna get, you
know, fired from your job.
I get it. But now is the time.
If there's ever been a time for you to stand up and do this.
I mean, I would say the same thing with the COVID-19
conversation, but we're right back, this immediacy
of people dying in real time.
Now is the time to find some principled stance in all this
and fight for these things now, you know,
and by the way, like I'm seeing an increasingly growing
amount of people in the West, at the very least,
who are Jewish, who are standing up in positions just like
this, which is very uncomfortable, I imagine for them.
So here is, uh, Abir share, uh, shares.
This, this is at the Pitzer College.
A Jewish man stands up in this meeting
and speaks out against what they're doing
and says, I'm gonna go stand
with the Palestinian protestors,
which I guarantee you, I mean, he probably lost them.
This is this. I'll let it, I'll let it speak for self
- Nine.
Uh, and I'm feeling very moved by what's happening just
outside these doors.
My my grandfather was a Holocaust survivor.
He was in concentration camps
and I grew up with stories of genocide and mass starvation,
and I'm holding a lot of tension
between being in this room right now
and what's happening in here
and what's happening just outside these doors.
And I've given the Pixar pretty much every year since I
graduated for 15 years,
and I can no longer continue to do so.
I'm gonna go join the students.
And I've pledged to not donate to Pixar until it ends.
Its complicity in the genocide
and oppression of Palestinian people.
- Good for him. I mean, that had
to have been difficult, right?
And what's interesting though is I really didn't see
the expected pushback that I thought, well, you know,
you know, you get those when you're in the crowd like
Clinton speaking on stage or whatever, and someone stands up
and says you're a war criminal, even though they're right.
Usually you get the crowd
that just goes, get outta here, here.
You can't, don't give us your good ideas about
the reality of what's going on.
We wanna be lost. You know, they all,
they push back weirdly enough though.
I feel like you sense a lot of like Uhoh.
He's saying the thing we're all thinking, right?
I'm telling you guys, there is a dramatic shift happening
and it's important to recognize.
Here's another example. This is a college student graduating
in 2024 who makes a very important statement about
what we should be thinking about,
which I think a lot of people haven't considered.
- I urge you all to acknowledge the class of 2024
of ZA
that no longer exists.
Students that will not be walking their stage this year,
and 14,000 children who will never walk a stage ever again.
Celebration without acknowledgement would be an
injustice on behalf of my people
and to my fellow graduates.
As many of us, our future healthcare professionals.
I urge you all to advocate
and go against the grain when advocating for human life
- And hopefully when it comes to things like injections
and medical manipulation as well.
But you know, we'll hope we get all of it. I
- Urge all schools, including UIC,
to divest from companies complicit
and con constructing genocide
- Guys, this is why they're so terrified about this.
You've got a massive green blat, his clip about TikTok,
and then what they're worried about, they see this,
they've lost control.
And the most clear example is in this generation, I mean,
they're all talking about this.
And again, whether you think they're misled
or wrong, the point is irrelevant to what they're afraid of,
which is that they are not controlling the, the,
the perception of this generation
and that they're about to step into some positions.
I mean, they're coming out of some Ivy League colleges here,
and they're gonna step into positions
where they're gonna have influence
and that will change the conversation.
'cause it, it's not like they're uninformed.
Like these people are speaking about
occupation and apartheid.
They understand the true reality of all
of this, at least to some degree.
And of course, all the misrepresentations
of the occasional person they show on the outskirts of one
of these protests who doesn't
understand one thing or the other.
It's, it's ridiculous to
pretend like that is the representation.
Most of the people that I see talk
to are very intricately aware of things that most
of the average protestors against them
or people on the news like Mr.
Joe Scarborough can't even wrap their mind around.
It's important to think about,
- Let us be the generation that holds morality close
to our actions and hold each other accountable.
In times like these with hardships we face,
there will always come ease.
And as Obiwan Kenobi has stated, may the fourth be with you
and all of your degrees.
Congratulations to the class of 2024.
- Here is a professor, uh,
Zinka, who's spoken out about this already.
He's a professor at Columbia University.
Says, one of my students at Columbia just told me she was
violently arrested by the NYPD for protesting off campus,
by the way, and had to go to the hospital.
They slammed her head into a truck.
She received multiple bruises and a concussion.
The demonization of student protestors by President Biden
and members of both parties, as well as the lockstep medias,
giving permission to cops
to wage a nationwide war on students, faculty,
and any protestors who dare to speak up
for the police at people of Palestine.
Realize, don't forget we showed you specifically the NYPD.
They invited President Herzog into some inner NYPD meeting
and they have very clear influence over the outcome
of actual enforcement.
That's crazy.
Or the nine one one call centers with carbine nine one one.
Like these are terrifying realities
that in a foreign country has control over.
And the point being that we're talking about the training
of different police forces, and I don't mean that
as a ubiquitous concept, but the idea
of the NYPD is shockingly obvious.
And my point is that this is something
that people are highlighting that there's a problem right
there and that they're doing so off campus now
and regard to people simply protesting, like, okay,
if the argument is they're supposed to be violating campus
rules and regulations, why are they being
arrested off campus for protesting for this?
Now that is happening.
But in regard to what they claim happened in re
as he's saying that they slammed her in a truck
and she got bruises and
who know the student could be lying about that.
He could be lying. Who knows? Always consider
that whatever cyber we're talking about,
whatever you can't prove and verify
should be up, up in the air.
But the point is that we know
that they are doing the off-campus part of this.
We're showing this constantly.
So just we're in a really bad way where, well,
frankly, I think we've been here forever.
But my point is that I think the good part of it is
that people are starting to see this, who never saw it
before, that the things you think are sacred they don't care
about and have never actually been there.
And one last point on this, I don't want you to forget.
'cause we've done a lot of focus on this.
NY pla played points out,
and I think this came from a Middle East observer.
It is the, the Israeli, this is an Israeli
documentary, which you can watch.
It's very clear and it's, it's, it's, it's important
to see shows how Mossad spies, which is not, not even
that secret of a conversation, dress up as sheik
and are sent to Syria and elsewhere.
Why? To sow discord and spread hate
and division right?
As Mossad, as as Israelis as Jews? No, no, no.
As pretending to be Muslims.
And then people point at that
and say, look at them screaming hatred against you.
Now that's not to say that there's not that happening,
but my point is always the same.
Just like with these protests, if they have to make it up,
if they have to dress up
and pretend to be the hatred so they can point at it
and say that's what they all think, then maybe it's not
as serious or bad as real as they wanna pretend it is.
Nobody honest will ever pretend
that the racism is not a real thing in whatever topic group,
whatever context, there's racism everywhere.
People in every group, in every ethnicity,
in every religion, there's gonna be somebody who feels
negatively about somebody just because of who they are.
That's just the way of the world.
Doesn't mean we should accept it, we should call it out.
But it doesn't mean you should try to stop them
or make it illegal for them to think that
that's just crazy madness.
It should be more conversation, more spotlights,
more highlights so we can all go, yeah, you're gross, man.
We all recognize you're disgusting.
That's the way it should work.
When they censor, it actually creates that.
And that's the point of Zionism in my opinion.
But here it says, the famous Jewish journalist was dressed
in disguise as the religious Sheik Abu Hamza.
They gave him a Syrian passport
and he entered Syria incognito to collect information.
How many Zionists are hiding under the cloak of Islam
and planted in Muslim and western countries
to spread corruption and strife answer, he writes tens
of thousands of their opinion.
But I frankly, I flatly agree, agree with that, can't talk.
But the other thing I'm asking is not just the bigger
picture of what they're clearly provably doing.
And let's not forget the CIA
and probably other groups in reverse
are probably doing the same thing.
But we can prove that this is a, a very important dynamic
that's driving immediate real world casualties.
Ask yourself how much of that's happening in these protests?
More than we've already proven, by the way,
as the ion.org group that openly said,
we're calling on all people that you know, people to come in
and act like you're Muslims.
People that with Muslim sounding names that can fight
for people that it's infiltration.
And they were proudly displaying it.
And then we watched it happen, and they got caught for it.
This is part of what's going on. We can't forget that.
Now here's what, uh, uh,
Francesca Albanese also said in regard
to claims of antisemitism.
And then we're gonna get into some of these false
allegations about this
and exactly what we were just highlighting.
But here's what she had to say about the false
allegations of antisemitism. There's
- No other argument than accusing us of antisemitism so as
to deflect the attention from what matters the most from
what our analysis insists
upon For decades.
Now, I'm not surprised that Israel recurs
to any strategies it can to uphold its goals
to reach its, uh, objectives.
But I'm surprised that international communities joins this
action because today you are not just attacked by Israel
for being an anti-Semitic.
If you just ask for the application of international law
to Israeli, uh, Israeli actions.
It's many, many Western countries who do so and they betray.
Uh, also what antisemitism has really been,
every time I get accused falsely accused
of antisemitism, I respond.
I don't stay quiet. I don't get intimidated.
I become louder and louder.
And by doing so, I think I also
inspire other people to do the same. Yep,
- A hundred percent.
You show them that there is another path other than,
you know, cowering to the accusations
that you know aren't true.
That's why I respect her so much,
because she's stood up in this
and really clearly, she, she's,
she's made a stance in a time when it's important to do so.
And I think other, and like she said, she, she's set a, a,
a, a standard for people to follow.
'cause she, I mean, it's ridiculous to someone,
for someone who's calling out the crimes
of a government who's highlighting what's going on,
and it, this is why this has become so flimsy is,
and I'll show you some of the examples,
and especially when it comes to the example
of the eurovision we just saw, you know, it's so
pa self-evident that people are calling out people
that support the genocidal state of Israel.
Now, you can clearly argue that some of that might overlap
with specific feelings about Jewish people to argue that,
you know, that is ridiculous, ignorant.
And to accuse people of that, whether,
even if you don't know that is just flat propaganda.
But the point is that a lot of this conversation for most
of the honest people in this conversation are acknowledging
the very real reality of the crimes they're committing.
And at the same time are,
and my opinion are not ignorant, will, I mean,
I would say ignorant enough to, to not see the manipulation
between Zionism and Judaism.
And they're very clearly recognize that
and would never be as broad enough
to say all Jews are one thing.
And nonetheless, they call her anti-Semitic for doing so.
So they've lost control of that.
Here is one of the points of the lies.
Michael Tracy, who's a Jew himself says, Elise Stefanik,
you remember we called her out in the beginning for the,
the, she's the one that really started to drive the claims
of these protests.
Like there was clips in forth, like her hands are shaking.
And she's like, and she was calling out the, the, the,
remember the president of the Harvard and everywhere else.
And she got blind following from a lot of the right wing,
high level pundits who were just, again, completely okay
with censoring speech as long
as the speech they don't like showing you that they're just
as ridiculous as the woke mob.
Just as ridiculous. And she came out doing the same thing,
accusing them of how, you know, saying that
what they were doing was hatred for Jews,
even though it's clearly not, even though we can now see
that majority, in some cases, the majority are Jewish people
that are put on by Jewish organizations,
but these people don't care
or they're just that stupid, which is terrifying
because they are powerful.
They're not leaders, but they definitely have some power.
But she write, he writes, Elise Nik, who appears
to have devoted her entire career
to fueling anti-Semitism hysteria, claims
that students marched
through a Brooklyn high school chanting killed the Jews,
New York City Chancellor says
after exhaustive investigation, there's no evidence of that.
It doesn't stop her though, right?
Because she's got a very clear agenda.
You know, I wonder who's driving that? I'm
- Gonna switch to Origins High School.
In October, 40 to 50 students march
through Origins High School, chanting death to Israel
and kill the Jews in addition. And
- Don't you love, okay, so first of all, just to point out,
she's not saying this is a report.
She's not saying this is what was told to me.
She's saying this happened.
Even that same, like in in the context of all this, you have
to realize this is very aggressive.
In any normal ca setting, there would be like, you know,
here's a New York Times report that says X, Y, and Z.
She's just going, this is what happened, and she's wrong.
By the way, it didn't happen. What's driving that?
Is it APAC money? That could be, is it something else?
I don't know. But I find it interesting.
These people like Biden and the rest are,
are destroying their careers.
And the maybe the the flimsy thread of any kind of
account or, uh, um, uh,
respectability they might have had is all
out for the Zionist agenda.
Doesn't make sense to me. It really doesn't. An
- Independent investigation found that, uh, a teacher
who teaches global history was told by a student,
I wish you were killed.
Another student called her a dirty Jew
and the student said he wished Hitler could have hit more
Jews, including her.
What disciplinary actions have been taken against those
students who chanted death to Israel at Origins High School
and a against the student who harassed
with antisemitic slurs? That teacher,
- Well, well first the, the, the, the student,
the individual student who said things, well, you know,
there's ways to go about that, that
don't involve legal processes.
He's in a school, hold him accountable for it.
But see, Nik wants you to step over that process and,
and arrest him because he said things that I don't like.
Well, yeah, those are gross statements.
If they're actually what he said, which who knows if
for all we know, he said, free Palestine.
That's how it gets framed. That's how ridiculous this is.
Either way, it's an individual student in an individual
class saying something, it's a teacher, get,
suspend him then, or it's just crazy the kind of things
that they're trying to fold into some larger international
lie that's just simply not true.
Here's how he responds.
- Thanks. First of all, when we have done our investigation,
we have found no evidence that there was any movement
through the hall saying death to the Jews.
We looked at, and I treat that very, very seriously.
We, that was reported in the papers,
we have found no evidence that that actually happened.
- Oh, surprise, surprise. Yeah.
But does that change anything?
No, because they reported it and she blindly follows it
because that works for her narrative.
These are the kind of cartoon cutout repeaters
that we have in positions of power in this country.
And what do you think that drives,
that drives in some cases, Jews
to genuinely think they're at threat
by average people in the street,
which isn't true in most cases.
And it also drives people to bel
to actually hate Jewish people under the guise, the,
the manipulation that this is being driven by some kind
of an only Jewish state.
The reality is it's a Zionist manipulation that a lot
of Jews in the world are beginning to see.
If people like St who are desperate
for their own complete benefit to push something
that has enough no bearing in reality, no,
no rooting in reality, and she's gonna keep going.
She is clearly, as he says, devoted her career
to fueling hysteria.
Is that what we want in supposed leaders?
They're not leaders by any stretch of the imagination.
Well, here's what arson Ky said,
a a supposed human rights lawyer, which I, I I'm starting
to question if that's even real.
He says, the Kiva has become today's version
of the KKK hood.
No, this isn't the Babylon beat.
That's a real statement, guys.
I just can't even believe we're in a point where
that's the kind of thing that on,
like this is a real statement made by a real representative
of Israel, a proud Zionist.
He says, how do we make sense of that?
Because it's shockingly ridiculous.
So, so anybody anywhere wearing that is a KKK hood,
or how do you even make that translation?
Since we're talking about a white supremacist group
and a group that you're calling Muslims in dangerous and,
and Islam and it's just ridiculous.
It's like vanilla isis, it's clumsy
and it just goes, well, let's just mash 'em together.
Let's see what they say. It's stupid.
It is lowbrow manipulation.
You just hope people go gasp racism. I'm terrified of that.
I'm gonna look away. I'm gonna go with what you said arson.
Well, here's what I said. Are you,
are you calling these all these Holocaust survivors
and Jews, either alongside them wear or,
or wearing a key for themselves equivalent to the KKK?
Remember, he, he's in this video
wearing right there.
He's wearing one. He's a Holocaust survivor.
So as I said, very clearly as I called him out
after that, oh, I thought it was in this one.
Oh, I guess not. Or maybe it was under this.
Oh, I know what it was.
It was in the one that I shared here. Hold on.
When I quoted him, I put it out this way too. There it is.
So underneath that, I simply said, I usually do that, right?
I comment so people following him can see it.
Then I share it out to my, my thread
so people can see what I had to say there.
And I simply said, I tagged him
and I said, would you like to add something
or are you happy to let this implication stand?
Which then clearly implies
that you do not care about Jews or racism at all.
But instead only about defending Zionism
and its open bigotry and hatred by hiding behind this lie.
Of course, he hasn't responded.
I mean, how could you possibly pretend
that's the case when you have Holocaust survivors
and Jewish organizations
and Jews themselves sitting in solidarity eating together?
Like remember this one?
You have, you have Jewish organizations
and Jews along Muslims sitting there eating like they're
celebrating a Jewish holiday along
the Palestinian supporters.
And this is supposed to be aggressive Jew hatred,
that they're all terrified by.
I mean, it's literally stupid guys.
It's like the most provable lie I've
ever seen this conversation.
And these people are saying, these are the new KKK members.
Aviva KPAs points out this monument
to Copenhagen Commemorates Denmark's rescue
of the Jews during the Holocaust.
It's been vandalized by people who believe
that 6 million dead Jews wasn't enough.
Okay, let's break this down.
First of all, we don't know what actually happened here.
We've already seen many examples,
which I've shown you recently.
Where in Canada, in the United States
where these people are caught pretending these things.
Example was a Jewish store owner who defaced his own store
and then got and said, this was a race.
I hate crime. And he got caught lying about it.
In no way am I saying
that means it never happens or that's not possible.
I'm just simply arguing. We can't just blindly assume
that it's the thing that it looks like,
because that's very I naive to do on top of that.
So does Aviva Klum know who vandalized it?
Does she know who did this?
Because then how could you know that they believe something
that's pretty dumb?
The point is they just say what they want you to think,
and a lot of blind followers go along with it.
But that's an increasingly small number right now.
But let's, let's, let's go past that.
So let's pretend you somehow know what they believe.
You know what the people who did it, first of all,
and that what they believe and that they then believe
that the, that many Jews wasn't enough.
So you know their intentions beyond their beliefs.
Yeah, that's called stupid.
That's called what I mean,
you could call it a thousand different things.
That's what the corporate media does every day.
We know what Putin wants.
We know what the Chinese are thinking
because you guys are children
that are following those people
that you believe those people.
And I don't believe a lot do, quite frankly.
I think it's an increasingly grow smaller number of people
that blindly fall into those traps.
How can we not recognize that?
Can't possibly know what that person thought
or feels or believes.
That's ridiculous. My point was, of course it is.
Possibly this was, it's possible this was committed
by one protesting Israel.
Of course it is. But with all the many,
many times just since October 7th that this has been exposed
as complete fabrications by Zionists
or pro-Israeli protestors.
We need to ask if this was the same.
And then I highlight the very thing we just talked about
where St is lying
and gets caught lying about what they claim happened
or what the news said happened, which wasn't actually true.
My point on this guy, the way is, look, I,
I don't personally, I personally don't think
that a Palestinian would do this,
because that seems disrespectful
to what they're wearing that for.
But overall, like what, what is this supposed to say?
It's like, I believe they tried to write free Palestine.
I just don't think this makes any sense for what people,
but certainly could be.
Certainly could be.
But we already know as a matter of fact,
that they've been caught lying about things like this
repeatedly caught defacing buildings.
And I'm talking about unprovable examples.
Zionists or Jewish people themselves
who have made these allegations that are caught,
Canada just caught one police just called one out
in regard to what happened to the protest.
We've seen 45 examples of them pretending to get hit.
They stabbed me in the eye,
but you seemingly have no blemish.
Or the fact that they claim that they're being trapped
or I'm being aggressively stalked
and they're the ones walking, it's, it's infuriating.
If you have to lie about these things, it's probably not
as serious as you're claiming, which is in no way
to suggest it's not happening in some case.
But here's what Jonathan Cook points out.
Another example of this manipulation und points out reminder
that if you hear cheers for Israel during the broadcast
of the Eurovision conversation, it's actually
because IBU is using anti booing techniques, trying
to cover up booze with fake cheers for tv,
which is actually, it's actually pretty crazy.
It's, it says, but this is
how it's actually like inside the arena.
So the point is, if you watch the real version,
which you can look up, it's interesting
that you can't hear any of the booze.
You wanna hear what it actually sounded like, which is,
but you know, it's the truth because even people like you
and Levy are now making a big stink about
how they're only doing this because she's Jewish.
Because again, you know what 400,000 people feel
and think, yeah, you're real smart Elon.
I mean, you can very clearly hear
that there's a predominant boo going on.
There's some cheering happening too,
but it's very clear that the
boo, they're booing over the top.
Now I'm not, you guys can think what you want about it.
I mean, personally, I think there's a level of decorum.
What, you know, 'cause I, the person's there on behalf
of the is Israel of Israel,
but who knows what they really think.
Personally, I would argue
that you could probably assume they support
Israel, but I don't know for sure.
So I probably wouldn't have booed the individual.
But either way, you know why people are doing this guys.
They do not want to support somebody
who is supporting Israel.
You could argue that means something about Jewish people,
but you're the one literally
saying it's the state of the Jews alone.
So wouldn't that be a fair argument? Anyway?
But my point is that it's not actually, most of them think,
and I only say fair argument
because that's what you frame it as,
even though it's not actually true.
So it's just this funny, ridiculous narrative circle
of nonsense, of nonsensical logic where you make that claim.
And then if I highlight that claim, I'm somehow racist.
Like that seems really dumb, like a lot of this stuff.
But most of these people, in my opinion, are simply booing
because they want the world to see
that we don't support Israel.
Many of them in many of these contexts, look,
I don't know them in this point here,
but in the points we've proven like these
protests, many of them are Jewish.
So there's, they're booing Israel
or they're calling out Israel and they're Jewish.
So you can't be broad stroking any criticism
as anti-Semitic or hatred for Jews.
But again, I just don't need to stress this.
'cause I think most people see it right now.
- You suck - . This is funny 'cause people you suck.
But the point is, he says, could, could there be a starky,
a starker image of western elites manufacturing of reality
for us, popular anger at Israel's inclusion at Eurovision.
Which by the way, that's another point I forgot
that's been there long before October 7th.
Why in the world is a Middle East
country involved in Eurovision?
Because they're desperate
to make you think it's part of Europe.
They kind of gave up on that lie a long time ago.
They wanted you to think they're somehow in
the middle of this, but they're part of Europe.
They're not actually Middle East,
but they, that doesn't work if they're trying
to act like they're
surrounded by enemies in the Middle East.
The point is, it's not part of Europe.
They just do it because it's about
propaganda purposes, guys.
That's what this is always about, increasing their v
the way you view them.
But so the point is the anger at them
for even being involved is
pretty prominent long before this.
But it's expressed as booing at the event, airbrushed out
by the media, replaced
by politically more convenient cheering, which is a lie.
But they did it anyway. Here's what Elon
and Levy had to say about it here tonight.
A brave, young Jewish woman. Why is she brave? Exactly.
'cause she went on stage. What
about the other people who weren't Jewish?
Are they brave too? Or is she just
default brave because she's Jewish?
It's just, it's like they can't realize
that we can see these just flimsy narratives they
push out, right?
I mean, she's a woman who went out on stage.
So she's no more brave than anybody else that's there.
His argument is she's brave because everybody hates Jews.
That's what his argument is.
He says she will be bullied by crowds of antisemite
who either supported a massacre of Jews at a music festival
or think the follow up should be a
boycott of the country again.
So every single person there either hates Jewish people,
supports their death at a festival
or boycotts the right of you to be, it's just ridiculous,
flimsy, broad stroke, lowest common denominator Bs.
That's why he's bad at this job.
But my point is, I, before I could even tweet this out,
I already saw him saying this.
It's because they hate Jews.
No, it's probably because they're protesting Israel.
But either way, neither
of us know the reality of that, Elon.
But here's what she, he pushes even further.
Here's a Greek representative, uh,
Greek singer at Eurovision who apparently pretended
to be sleeping while they were singing, God forbid.
But of course, here's what he says about it.
Pathetic, childish, bigoted behavior.
Or she just didn't enjoy the performance
or she hates it's Israel or Jewish people.
I don't know. Neither do you, you complete moron.
But here's what media said.
This is great Greece, representative, singer and,
and embarrassment for Greece, for every decent Greek person.
You know, despite the fact that like the vast majority
of everybody there was acting the same.
But let's pick per out pretending
to fall asleep while Israel's contestant is speaking,
is not just bad education or pure Jew hatred,
but also a stain over the Greek nation.
She represents my God Jew hatred.
That's the point I'm making. It's just lazy.
It is lazy and it's creating the very thing
that they think they're trying to, it's, it's embarrassing.
They don't care. Same point this person says,
we're told the pro-Palestinian protests
are entirely peaceful.
Well, you can prove that by the way.
It's not whether we're told or not.
It's self-evident if you just don't blindly follow
narratives and ignore all the evidence.
You can see it says if Eden Golan opted to walk
to Eurovision for now a final rather than be escorted
in a dozen vehicle armed convoy
with helicopter support, that's not a joke.
What do people think would happen?
This is, this is the same as pretending
because they had to cover the monument
and the other protests that that meant
that the monument would've been attacked.
You can't do something under the guise
that you think a problem's there and not prove that problem
and then point to your actions as proof of the problem.
This is the kind of illogical propaganda manipulation
that the a child could see through.
So it is peaceful. That's an obvious reality.
My point is, they're saying if she decided
to just walk there with no sup, with no,
I mean all this protective support
and the point is they point at that protective duty
as evidence that she would be attacked.
It's, that's, it's, it's one does not equal the other.
You guys are doing this either
because you, blindly by the lie that she's in danger
or you do it to make the lie look real.
In any case, it's not what's happening.
But look at all the comments down below.
Or actually more importantly, look at what he said.
Elon and Levy responds.
They would peacefully lynch her, Lynch her.
So we're, we're back in in Jim Crow.
Now we're just gonna lynch people
because no, the idea that this is what you can see
historically has happened to Palestinians at Zionist hands
right up until very recently.
In fact, what we can see going on in Gaza right now
is an interesting statement.
What he's saying is, all you Europeans
and Americans, everybody else, you're all racist anti you
hating maniacs and we're defending her from you.
That's what he's doing. You would just,
they would just peacefully lynch her
because the vast majority
of people in the world are
supporting what they're fighting for.
None of them want to lynch anybody.
As they say, every accusation is an admission.
Here's what Belgian TV did during this Eurovision.
They actually broke through good for them with a statement
that said to address Israel's genocide.
It said, this is a union action.
We condemn the human rights violations committed by Israel.
Additionally, Israel is destroying press freedom.
This is why they are pausing the broadcast for a moment.
Good for them, of course.
What do you think it got framed as? Can you guess?
Can you take a guess? A shot in the dark, ladies
and gentlemen, what they called that racism,
a Jew h Of course they did, despite the fact
that they very clearly highlighted the fact
that it's about the crimes of Israel.
But you're not allowed to do that.
You can't acknowledge crimes of Israel
because you must be a racist.
Pretty stupid. But you wanna see
what a real racist looks like.
And I'm really glad this is actually happening.
It's starting to show that there is some
kind of turn happening here.
We showed you this clip, remember this, this
where this guy was like aggressively, aggressively going
after this Muslim woman for no reason.
Where she's like, leave me alone, leave me alone.
He's like, I'm not like in a very childish way.
Like I'm not even touching you.
Like just getting up in her face
and screaming racist things at her both.
Look at this guy, look at how threatening that is.
You know who this guy is. He's a teacher.
So as we're sitting here talking about all the ridiculous
narratives about how the, we should never let these teachers
teach these kids in regard to the protest.
Why? Because you get overwhelmed with a bunch
of Republican talking points about
how they're all woke indoctrinated mindset.
Which by the way, most of them probably are lost
to some degree or entirely in the woke ideology.
I'm not gonna dispute that. But that doesn't influence,
I mean, it doesn't have to influence the reality of
what they're fighting for, which is their free
speech, their right to protest.
And the fact that we can all see a, a genocide,
which most conservatives I argue can see as well.
But what do you think this looks like?
There's no misunderstanding.
This his name is Yulman is out,
or it says Yulman is out per a SU President Michael Crow
quote, he is no longer permitted to be on the campus
and he will never teach here again, end of story.
That's what happens when you are an open, bigoted,
disgusting, racist, do screaming racist things at a person
for no reason because you have Zionist beliefs or
because you believe you're justified
because they're all bad and you're the right one.
Like these are gross people, guys.
This is the true thing that they claim we're fighting when
they talk or the, this is the reality of
what they claim they're fighting when it comes
to the US government and everybody else.
In fact, this is what they're creating.
That's the inversion as usual.
But a SU has said on Monday
that he was on leave pending an investigation.
It's important. Glenn Greenwald shared that.
Now, here's something I wanted to include
before we go to the next segment, I think is important.
I'm talking about lies and manipulations.
I mean, check this new video out guys,
and I'll go into what the report is to show you just
'cause you know, for all we know that there wasn't a rocket
that was fired that did hit the here.
I, I don't, I don't know. I think it's hard not to see this
as, as let, let's put it this way.
If they reporting this happened
and your only source is the IDF,
just like we made the point in Ukraine with
how many times they've been caught lying,
and I mean even worse than Ukraine, in fact.
'cause the corporate media has now shifted
into calling out these lies.
The, I don't know why anybody, anywhere
and Bush is by the way, why I kind of see this
reported in most of the main platforms just yet.
It's obvious that we shouldn't take them at face value.
But watch this and you tell me if this doesn't look like a
ridiculous B movie,
- We are here in be in the Southern. What
- Was the point of that first clip at all
to make it seem like there was some kind of action going on?
You lay down. I
mean, it's like they don't even think this stuff. Part
- Of Israel, as you can see behind me,
a missile exploded in the middle of the playground.
This missile was part of a rocket barrage
that was launched from Gaza.
Fortunately no children were to hear at the time
- During - The mean, look, I'm,
I'm not gonna dispute the fact that rockets could be fired,
but let's realize that you're literally talking about an
ongoing murder campaign.
Let's just, let's just say you, you're uncomfortable
with the provable reality of what a genocide looks like.
Are you gonna pretend that there's not crimes taking place?
Are you gonna pretend that there's not obvious murder taking
place, open, ongoing, constant murder
of massive groups of people.
I mean, come on. It's obvious that
there's something wrong happening.
And what we're gonna do is point back
to this incident here where nobody was hurt.
I mean, doesn't that seem a little bit obscene?
Now also on the, the reality that we're talking about,
which they often point out that most of these rockets,
now there is a difference today,
I don't know which one this was,
but some of them don't in fact have guidance.
So that's the claim they've always used when they say,
because there no guidance that means it's,
it's indiscriminate bombing.
So it's a war crime, which is not an unfair argument.
But then when they want to, they go,
they targeted this hospital.
It's like, well, you just said they don't have targeted
systems, so they just throw lies back and forth.
That's what Israeli government does.
So for all I know, this was a completely fabricated reality.
But at the same time, we know
that there are rockets being fired
and we know that they're currently under constant murder,
starvation and open genocide.
So it's kind of harder to see that they would try not
that they wouldn't try to fight back,
but interestingly enough, it has been a very,
very sm there's been very few things
that have been fired since like
the first three months of this.
Here's what the report says, A rare Hamas attack.
And they point that out because it hasn't been anything
after the first three months for the most part.
Hit a a, uh, v er shiva in Friday evening injuring a woman,
a total of five rockets were fired from Gaza.
They claim the Israeli defense forces said,
that's my point right there is if all we have is the Israeli
defense forces, the Israeli occupation forces saying
something, we have
to question whether this is not even real,
whether they did this themselves, whether they, who knows
that's not that far outside their own possibility,
especially how we've already caught them blatantly
manufacturing very important scenes of investigation.
But it says one was intercepted by the Iron dome
and another four hit open areas.
So you're telling me there was a woman standing in an open
area that just got hit and injured her like that?
That doesn't even seem consistent.
But why is it's an open area?
Why would there be a playground that was hit?
Doesn't that seem inconsistent?
I mean these are things that we obviously point out all the
time, but right now it seems much more relevant.
A 34 7-year-old woman was taken to the hospital
and she was lightly injured by shrapnel.
Images from the city showed impact in a children's
playground with some of the plastic installation
installations mangled, which I didn't really see that much.
I saw a spot on the ground.
But it says, uh, bi re shiva,
the largest Israeli city in the south of the, on the verge
of, uh, the, of desert has not been targeted
by rocket fire since December.
It says, uh, basically the point is they stopped firing
for the most part after the three months
because they claim they ran out of four of munitions.
So then why are they firing now?
I don't know, it doesn't make,
there's inconsistencies I think,
but it says recent launches targeted Israeli communities
immediately across the border.
So all I'm saying is that this is something at the very
least that's pretty hard to,
to focus on while you're watching in the time it took me
to report this, 15 children died in Gaza, right?
So let's not, let's make sure we have our priorities
straight, but at the same time we need to question whether
or not this is a legitimate reality.
I think that's important. , by the way, hold on.
Any question whether or not this is a legit, sorry, sorry
for hearing me redundant there.
I keep forgetting to end the telegram
live stream by the way.
And it drives me crazy. I'm so,
I hope we weren't watching that.
I just ended it. But if you don't end it,
apparently if you end the stream
and leave it open, you aren't unable to stop the stream
until the next time you start a stream.
I don't like telegram . That's silly.
Anyway, you didn't need to hear that.
Here is the other, this is,
oh, and that was the point in general.
So we're talking about a rocket that they claim was fired,
that they claim he had a playground, which
of course becomes this big problem about, you know,
targeting children even though again they argue it's
indiscriminate or because there's no
targeting systems and so on.
But what did we just talk about
the lie about the Kareem Shalom crossing
and he did it again on May.
In May 8th, he pushed it out again where he said,
wake up Hamas is trying to sabotage a deliveries into Gaza
that they fired the Kareem Shalom crossing.
No, they did not. And it's a provable reality according
to a i, according to reports from Israelis on the ground,
and according to reports from Israeli media,
soldiers were stationed on the border
near the Kareem Shalom crossing to guard equipments
of battalions preparing to invade Rafa.
It's reported right on the surface
and he still lies about it.
The point was, these were groups not at the Kareem Shalom
crossing, but near it, where they set up an installation
to prepare their ongoing genocide of Rafa.
And all they can do is go,
they bomb the aid even though they didn't.
And here's what somebody on the ground said.
It's a staging area outside Gaza where troops are preparing
for the Rafa and patient near the, the crossing.
It's just so shocking how obvious it is to prove these lies
and they just keep doing it.
So my point is, if he has, if they're lying about so,
such an egregious reality that we can easily prove,
we should wonder whether just manufactured lies elsewhere,
which we know that they do.
And here is another lie in the same regard
where it's going all the way into today
or Kga, who we've proven 15 times over as a egregious liar.
They make up lies about food aid
and everything else that we've proven many times
over where they go.
Hamas just fired the cream shalom,
the main humanitarian aid crossing.
You know why they keep pushing this?
Even I, for all I know, that didn't even happen.
First of all, what we can prove is
that they fired on a military installation
where they were building for Rafa.
Whether that continued after that.
I mean, who knows for all
because they, they, this is what they've done before.
Even Har has covered
how they would lie about stuff like this
for their own agendas to benefit themselves politically.
The point is
that it's possible they're lying about this entirely
to manufacture the illusion that the reason aid stopped was
because they were bombing the crossing.
And I'm gonna show you why I say that
because aid since like four
or five days ago has completely stopped,
not just slowed down like utterly
and completely stopped while Elon still is going.
We're bringing in more than ever. And so is kga.
It says this is the fourth time this week
that they actively targeted this, this crossing.
And Elon says the same thing.
This should be the front page story.
Harry knows what that you wrote something on Twitter.
Sorry, we like facts
to report things Elon, I know you don't.
Now we just covered this discussion.
Israel ceasefire, long con
and Rafa massacre
where we discussed the lie about the cream
shalom crossing if you wanna watch that.
But let's realize that Israelis are sabotaging roads
to block and prevent humanitarian aid from coming in.
That's one part. I mean literally doing this everywhere,
celebrating having raves and,
and feasts in front of where people are starving
by blocking the food, by dumping trucks in front
of everybody being cheered on by the Israeli government.
But here is what Sam rose from RA reporting.
And don't forget, even their allies have now called them out
for not producing any evidence that Unru was ever connected
to Hamas or part of October 7th.
They've repeated this publicly from the
US government from Canada.
They just keep lying about it.
But here's the point though, no aid has come through.
- It has come into Gaza now since Sunday, no aid,
no fuel, no supplies, nothing.
And we really are now down to our last reserves.
We have a few more days of flour that we can,
we can provide, but,
but everything else will start to shut down very,
very soon without fuel, without nothing that we can do
with any of these suppliers.
So the situation is really, really desperate
as we wake up this morning.
- That's the reality. They stopped
just like they did in the beginning by the way.
And in case you wanted that proven, which I hope you do.
'cause even for me or anybody else,
you should not blindly take these things at face value
even from UN R or anybody else.
The point is, you can see that they have done nothing.
This has dropped off, right?
This report is as of May 10th.
This is an important page to follow.
Look at this full electricity
blackout and I mean that's what they're doing.
Zero fuel, zero everything.
They've now dropped it down to nothing.
Interestingly, just like they did
in the first couple of weeks.
Now these are weeks over here, right?
Seven to the 12th, 13th and 19th.
It's the longest two weeks
of zero aid while they were getting 500 trucks including
fuel before that.
And you can clearly see that they came nowhere close.
These are the daily averages per week. 11 43, 59.
I mean that's creating starvation guys.
Anything under 500 was going to create more starvation
because even at 500 they were in their food insecure.
It was reported by everybody up to October 7th.
And you can see the numbers in the podcast don't even get
over 200 until barely until into April.
And then they shoot up to 340 for one day
and still that's less than 500.
So still it's not going
to help these people in the way that it needs to.
You're gonna help in some cases,
you're gonna get some food to some people.
But if we're, as they've now said in full blown famine,
direct quote in the, in the north,
they need a thousand trucks a day.
They need saline Dr
or rather, whatever it is, the, you know, sustenance,
they need IVs and more to, to pull them out of this.
That's not my opinion. That's a mental
assessment of people involved.
And what do they do? They go to zero.
There's just no way to misunderstand this guys.
They are stepping this up
and people are gonna start to starve to death immediately.
They already are. How much you wanna vet Elon Levy makes an
argument that they've been bringing in Maureen
and the UN won't do anything to help
as they're over here going,
we're here and no one's bringing it in.
Like it's just disgusting.
Maybe the reason they fired Elon is to remove that kind
of overlap to where, hey, he's not our guy anymore.
So he can just lie, lie.
I mean he already was, but either way, that's
what it seems to be his role.
It's rough. Now
Elise Stefanik in another ridiculous propaganda way came out
to go after Joe Biden enough, which also continues
to show you their inner dynamic of the left right paradigm.
'cause they're all actively fighting for their own power
inside the US government
as they all line up in the same direction, right?
Here's her $592,000 loan
or you know, bribe coming from apac, just a phonic.
I wonder if that influences her actions. What do you think?
Especially knowing that they would yank
that the moment she didn't do what she was told.
That's what we keep seeing.
Well, here's what she says last night,
and this was, she posted this on the ninth.
Joe Biden doubled down on his plan to undermine Israel
by withholding the munitions needed to target Hamas
and avoid civilian casualties.
Let me, let me get this straight. Did you actually just
write that you doubled down on his plan to, uh,
to withhold munitions that they need
to avoid civilian casualties?
That's what the sentence reads.
So how exactly do you need munitions to avoid casualties?
Like this is her clumsy, ignorant writing.
Like I, this is just
because I think those are,
they're bullet points he's trying to include.
Oh, and they're avoiding casualties.
But you do it in a way that makes you look like you don't
even know what you're talking about with.
So the munitions they would've had,
would've helped them not kill civilians.
Like that's the stupidest thing in the world.
Like I guess you could try to argue
that they were giving them more precise
munitions, but that's not even true.
The ones they're withholding in this conversation are the
2000 pound dumb bombs.
The ones that are not precision
and well, that's provable .
So again, just ridiculous.
You are a ridiculous cartoon of a person
who is blindly working in efforts against your own country.
It's crazy to me. Her point though is that they, in defiance
of Congress, Biden's decision, green Lights, Hamas,
Hezbollah, and Iran to escalate attacks.
No, it doesn't. That's just your Zionist talking point about
how all of these groups are gonna rise
up and overthrow the world.
You mean like the oza movement you support's gonna do
or the Israel openly says they're gonna do
with the Greater Reset project or greater Israel project?
Yes. There is no indication that Hezbollah
or Iran in general or any of them have designs to go
after everybody the moment that
what Israel's not in their way.
I mean, let's be honest about that.
That's not what's happening.
They're not, but Israel is clearly
not in any position to stop.
Any of them are doing anything,
especially without the support of the United States.
So it's just this clumsy overlap to make you think whatever.
And this will be parroted by all the right wing screamers,
just like anything that left the same way,
the left right paradigm, guys, they don't know,
just like Joe Scarborough,
they don't know what they're talking about.
Here's the point. The US withheld a a bomb shipment,
a bomb shipment to Israel out of fears.
It could be used in Rafa. That's what they said.
Anyway, meanwhile,
they've allowed a lot of other things to continue.
And as I said on a recent show, let's not remove, let's not
for, let's not forget there is a thousand ways
that they could send weapons through other entities,
through other channels,
or directly through their own with doing so secretly.
These people are not honest
by stopping a single shipment is a, it's a ploy.
It is a, it is a pation.
Guys, they still support this
as Matt Miller will happily tell you.
Oh, it's just now it's just a limited action,
not a real full action.
Oh, so let me explain for me the difference.
I just saw 400 children die today is that is limited.
Okay, got it. So it's okay as long as they kill under 500.
Okay? Like that's the kind of BS they're playing
and it should make you sick.
They're, they're literally endorsing genocide
by acting like if it was a little bit more than that,
then we would be an okay with it.
And they're still supporting them.
They're still giving them everything.
They still have generals on the ground as Axios reported.
They've got people on the ground
as they still try to lie about.
Now, here is the actual report that we've shown you before.
This is a New York Times investigation
that Hart's is citing.
Israel used the most destructive bombs,
and these were the 2000 pound dumb bombs we've talked about
on the areas designated as safe.
How do you reconcile that statement with
what she's talking about over here?
So they need those to avoid killing the people
that they aimed at, people that are fighting
for a foreign entity at the expense of Americans.
Now, here is another one of those ridiculous clowns,
and here's what he said in Congress.
Now this was shared by a Hebrew channel in general,
but what he says, Lindsey Graham, it's just, I'll, I'll,
I'm gonna stop it a few times.
It's kind of shocking. And all he's doing,
his only job right here is
to act like he's some grandstanding
and outraged, morally outraged about
how you stop the shipments.
And after that we'll go through all of the disgusting things
that are happening because of those weapon shipments
that he's trying to maintain.
- Confirm that there, that, that we're delaying transfer
or stopping transfer of certain weapons,
like 2000 pound bombs.
- Nope, just one shipment though.
And so that, that's the thing. They're important.
They want, even people like him want you to think that
that's, oh, they're just stopping all of them.
That's not the truth. If you read the report,
which I know they did
and don't care about, it's not stopping all of them.
That's not what's happening
- To Israel. Is that correct?
- Israel? - We're assessing, uh, okay, where,
you know, where we are right now.
- Well, they're media reports
that has happened. Are they incorrect?
- Don't you love that? So again, recognize that these
supposed people in the know are just being led
by other re people like the New York Times,
who literally just got caught de faking an entire story
about rape and called out by their own people
who it's continuing to just check out this a squirrel
because it is continuing to just fall apart in real time.
So he goes, this is happening.
And then he goes, well no, we're just assessing.
And so is that wrong? Then why didn't you start with that?
Why didn't you ask him? Is this a real story?
Why don't you tell me because you're the,
because it's about propaganda.
It's about setting narratives for people who are watching.
And the idea is they stop one of these shipments
because the world can see what's going on.
And is outrage about that is clear,
but what, uh, uh, off the top of my head, I'm blanking all
of a sudden on the, the general military entity sitting
there, God, what?
I forget his name. But the point is that he's saying
that no, we're just assessing, which probably is a lie,
but I don't think they stopped anything to be quite honest.
But the reality is what he's saying is we're trying
to assess whether or not they are.
Now, how can you be upset about that?
Wouldn't the argument be, oh good,
I'm glad we're making
sure that they're not violating the law.
No, Lindsey Graham is outraged by that.
You're not allowed to do that.
We need to help them, even if they are breaking the law,
which is the undeniable sentiment of what he's saying,
- That we have made a decision to.
Yeah, again, we've made no decisions. We're
- Assessing, okay, are you worried that if you make a
decision to deny weapons that Israel say they need, uh,
that it would send a signal to amass
and Iran to, to keep pushing
- Same old BS response.
Now, recognize that that's not what's happening.
Israel has already come out
and said, we don't need your weapons.
We're gonna invade Rafa either way,
which I guarantee he knows.
It's about framing the narrative
as you're letting your partner just, you know, stranded
with nothing to defend themselves.
That we have to fight for the Jewish state.
That's not what's happening. They would,
they're like, we don't even need you, us.
We've got plenty. So,
and I'll show you that next, actually, lemme see if,
I think it's right here in the actual next,
well, I'm just show you this.
I'll just show you this now and come back to it.
Here's what I, we've shown here
before, especially belligerent childish
representative of Israel.
She's the one that went up there and was openly saying about
how they're gonna kill people and
how the people in the Knesset who are is, who are not Jewish
or not welcome there and that you should cry somewhere else.
Like it's just, they're gross man.
And she says her name is Tali Gottlieb.
The US is threatening not to give us precise missiles.
And by the way, again,
there's clear narrative management going on here.
You can easily prove as even Lindsey Graham just said,
we're talking about the 2000 pound dumb bombs.
But she goes, oh yeah, , it's just so funny.
She's so childish. Well, I got news
for the us We have impre missiles.
I'll use it. I'll just collapse 10 in Gaza,
10 buildings, I'll do it.
That is what a grown woman said
in front of a political group.
Oh yeah, well use bad things and hurt people.
How do you think about that? That's what she's doing.
We should all laugh at people like this.
She shouldn't be in control of anything.
Let, she shouldn't be in control.
I mean, I can make all kinds of jokes,
but the point is, they should not be in power.
So when we're talking about Lindsey Graham, who's trying
to say that they need our weapons,
and if we don't, we're gonna leave them high and dry.
That's not even what's really happening.
But on top of that, his argument back to the clip, isn't
that gonna send a message to the people we pretend are
terrorists to just get our, what does that even mean?
They've, they use that same go-to every single time.
If we don't do what I claim we're supposed to,
don't you think that gives a message to the Russians
that we're weak and they're gonna invade everything?
It's not the reality. It's always a possibility.
It's simply just not the verifiable reality.
It's not what's actually happening in my opinion.
Assessment based on all the facts on the table,
the Iranians are not interested, in my opinion,
in invading every country.
The moment that Lindsey Graham looks the other direction,
neither are the Houthis.
Most of these groups are fighting
for resistance movements against oppression.
Now I argue as always, any of these governments would rise
to the position of the US if given enough time
and enough overwhelming power and influence.
That's just what I think government can ultimately become.
But what we're staring at now is him trying
to frame the people fighting against their genocide
as the ones that will do the thing they're doing,
should they not arm the one carrying out the genocide.
- Uh, Senator, we wanna make sure that we're providing, uh,
the right kinds of, uh, weaponry.
- Uh, okay. - Lo Lloyd Austin,
excuse me, I couldn't remember his name for a minute.
That's who he is. I saw his name tag,
so I didn't remember. .
- Would you have supported dropping the atomic bombs on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki General Brown in World War ii?
- Oh my God, this is crazy.
- Well, Senator, I think it just based
on the situation where the
- Well, we know, I mean, it happened.
We know . I'm not asking. They did it.
Do you think that was disproportionate?
- This is so fascinating to me.
Do you know what's happening right here? In my opinion,
look, it's a pretty common,
it's actually an interesting thing,
the conversation about dropping those bombs.
We're supposed to pretend like that was justified.
We're supposed to pretend as Americans that
that was somehow the right thing to do,
even though we all know it wasn't.
And everybody anywhere with a brain integrity
and any of the briefest understanding of history knows
that they were already pulling back in most every position.
And they decided to do it anyway, to threaten Russia
and to see what happened.
You guys can, you can literally find statements
by this from the people that were there at the time.
The point is, it was not about the necessity
of fighting off the evil of the world,
it's just not what happened.
And so, what he's doing right now,
which I know Lindsey Graham either, I mean, I, I can't speak
to what I, you know, I, I believe he's aware of
that clear reality.
If not, that's just as terrifying
because he doesn't even know basic realities of history.
But who knows? But he is putting it to them
because I think the secret understanding is we're all
supposed to pretend that's the right thing,
even though he knows, they probably don't want to say
that out loud, because average
Americans are gonna be like, what?
You, you, you agree with being the only country
to ever use a nuclear bomb on a bunch of civilians?
Like, that's crazy. But he's doing it for a tactical reason.
He's trying to get them to kind
of either not say no or say yes.
So we can turn around and go, that's why we need
to give the big bombs to Israel.
It, it's, it's, so is your analogy that you're,
that Israel's gonna bomb a bunch of civilians
with the bombs, and that should be okay,
because they're all bad guys.
We're not fit children.
We're not tucking a time where we didn't have the
understanding of the history or the internet.
Lindsey Graham doesn't, Rick does not wrap, wrap his mind
around that, or he is
so desperately compromised that it doesn't matter.
- It it was, uh, it was definitely, uh oh.
- Well, do you, do you in hindsight,
- You see, I don't think he wanted the answer
that it's a hard question because the
answer's no, we shouldn't have done it.
- Like, do you think that was the right decision for America
to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese
cities in question? Well,
- I'll tell you to stop the World War.
- No, it didn't. You see,
and that's the, that's the, that's the side.
That's the sc the the cop out. That's the sidestep.
No, it did not. The war was ending.
And you can find a thousand examples of
how they already knew this and they bombed anyway.
- Okay. Well, so we had a Do you agree General Austin,
if you'd been around, would you say drop him?
- God, this guy is such a belligerent war maniac.
I just can't get past how gross this person is.
- I, I, you know, I agree with the chairman here.
- I mean, I mean, if you were, if we go back in time, says,
Hey, we got two atomic bombs.
Should we drop 'em? What would you say?
- Well, you know, I think the leadership was interested
in, in curtailing
- The, see, well, what's, what's Andrew,
what's Israel interested in?
See, do you believe Iran really wants
to kill all the Jews? If they could,
- How are you even connecting these conversations?
So your argument is, we should use a nuclear bomb,
or we should allow them to have one
or at least a big munition,
because Iran wants
to kill all the Jews, which isn't even true.
I mean, it's shockingly stupid. It's shockingly alarming.
These people have actual power and this should terrify us.
And then you got screaming Republicans in the two party
illusion that broadly and blindly support people like this.
Now, I do agree that a lot of the conservatives are seeing
through people like this, but sometimes they just call them
rhinos and don't realize that it's not a two
part, it's a two party illusion.
In any case, though, these are people
that we should be scared about.
They're driving things that are in the act, your counter
to interests of Americans under the guise
that they're in your interest.
And what he's talking about now is the, the lie
that they want to kill all the Jews, despite the fact
that they're very clearly,
just like even Hamas, they're updated charter.
They're going after Zionism.
They recognize the difference between the people
of the country and the government.
Just like they very clearly say about the United States,
that when they burn the flag
or do, they're talking about the government
and the oppressive actions of that government,
which most Americans are becoming aware of right now.
And so all he's trying to do is create the blind acceptance
that because the Jews are at threat, which by the way,
there are Jews all over the world, not just in Israel.
Somehow. That's the only thing we wanna point at,
that we have to give them the bombs
that they're using to murder children.
And that's supposed to be the
rules based international order.
- The Iranian regime. Yeah.
They, they, do you believe Hamas is serious when they say,
we'll keep doing it over and over again? Do you, they, they
- Not.
That has been a leader in quotes in Qar,
who they clearly protect.
And by the way, is real fun.
Hamas, who is saying the thing that they wanna point at.
I have not seen the Hamas resistance
and Gaza say that I have not seen people on the
ground say we're gonna keep doing.
What I have seen is we'll continue to resist.
We'll continue to fight against oppression
until we get our self-determination.
And of course they just go, that means kill all the Jews.
And it's as easy as ever
for someone like him to lie about that.
- Do, do you agree that they will if they can? I I.
- And how do you even know that that's what they think?
This is a a game. I do.
- I'm not, do you believe
that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization
also been on the destruction of the Jewish state? Why?
- Why don't you just write down what you want us
to think Lindsey Graham and just pin it to the,
and just cover the screen with it
and say, this is what we're gonna know.
Like you're just for, this is not anything other than you
setting your narrative about the lies of all of this.
Hezbollah is a resistance group
that was grown organically in this country
that is fighting against all.
I mean, right now they are currently fighting against the
occupation that Israel has of their territory.
So again, it is a legal act of armed resistance.
And all they wanna do is call it all terrorism.
Or how about the Sudan, who you wanted to call terrorism
until they decided to normalize with Israel
and nothing changed, and all
of a sudden they're no longer terrorists.
So you don't need to look any further than
to realize the name terrorist only means against our
interest in the eyes of both of these countries.
- Hezbollah is a terrorist, terrorist organ. Okay?
So Israel's been hit in the last few weeks by Iran.
Hezbollah. Hamas. Oh,
- Oh.
But what you forgot to leave, what you forgot to include is
that they've been bombing, occupying
and murdering people in those
countries for a very long time.
But when they finally responded, which is a legal act
of armed resistance, Lindsey Graham uses that
to argue they're all terrorists.
So we should bomb their civilians too, with nuclear bombs
- Dedicated to their destruction.
And you're telling me you're gonna tell them
how to fight the war.
- It's not what he said. Lindsey Graham.
And here becomes the fake outrage.
What they said is we're evaluating shipments
because they're, they're potentially used to kill civilians
- And what they can and can't use when.
- So it's your munitions that you are giving them
and you're complaining
that you're telling them what they can and can't use.
No, you're not using us tax dollars to fund
what they're doing with those munitions.
But he doesn't care about that.
He wants you as an American to spend your tax dollars
that you worked for, that they still in every other way
to fund a foreign country's genocide.
And he's outraged about the fact that you don't want that
- Everybody around them wants to kill all the Jews.
Nope. And you're telling me
that if we withhold weapons in this fight,
the existential fight for the life of the Jewish state,
it won't send the wrong signal.
- None of them even said that, by the way.
He answered his own question, by the way.
You see how it got confused for a second?
'cause he realized, nobody said that. That's what he said.
And he asked him, but they answered in
a, in a kind of evasive way.
This person is a clown.
This is a character. He's playing a role.
- Do you still think it was a good idea, general Austin,
to get out of Afghanistan?
? I support the president. Yeah, I think
- Pick a lane, man.
Where, where are you? Even you, if you're gonna try
to make an analogy, at least connect the dots you,
you're trying to say here is that they, the idea is that
by stopping the support, it ended up badly.
But they're terrible overlaps.
The reality of Afghanistan is a shocking failure
because they never were there to stop terrorism.
I mean, a child in kindergarten right now
could recognize that reality.
Lindsey Graham either doesn't know it or didn't care.
All of it is we shouldn't have left. Therefore, arm is real.
That's his argument. I guess you
- Do.
I think it was a disastrous decision.
If we stop weapons necessary to destroy the enemies
of the state of Israel at a time of great peril,
we will pay a price.
This is obscene. It is absurd.
Give Israel what they need to fight the war.
They can't afford to lose. My God. God.
This is Hiroshima and Nagasaki on steroids.
- Wow. Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
So you just compared what Israel's doing to the open bombing
of a civilian population with nuclear weapons?
Yeah, I agree with you, man.
I don't think you thought that through.
I think he thinks you're gonna assume what that was
with some kind of triumph over evil .
It's the easiest thing in the world to recognize
that the very least that you bombed a city full
of civilians two times.
So again, guys, either he's trying to send a secret message
to Israel that we're okay
with you murdering this entire area of Rafa,
or he is that stupid.
I mean, it wasn't even a good analogy.
At the end of the day, he supports murder
and arming of genocide.
That's what he's talking about.
It's terrifying to me because these people have power.
And here again is this Israeli entity.
So you overhear, you've got Lindsey Graham pretending
to be a representative of the United States saying
that we have to give them whatever they need.
And here she is at the same time over in Israel saying,
oh yeah, you're not gonna give us what we need.
We're just gonna do whatever we want.
We're gonna bomb people with indiscriminate missiles.
That's what she says. And so we're not supposed
to connect those dots and be like they just said,
if you give them, they're gonna, I mean,
the point is they're killing innocent people.
They're proudly waving this in front of your face.
And Lindsey Graham can't even acknowledge that.
How do you, how do you see that as anything but dishonest?
Now, here is what Lindsey Graham is pretending isn't
happening or really wants to continue.
Times of Gaza reports day 215, just the past 24 hours,
four massacres committed by Israel.
60 people killed 110 injured one day at every single day.
Now, here are two clips that I want you to see in regard to,
and we're gonna get into a lot of the stuff
around these conversations.
Matt Miller, painfully sidestepping, obvious realities.
As I said, it's just painful
to watch this monster twist himself into a pretzel
to avoid any accountability
for Israel's shockingly blatant war crimes.
Crimes that even the mainstream media are now being forced
to openly call out in order to stop the hemorrhaging
of their dwindling following.
- A senior RA official,
Scott Anderson told Politico the other day
that IDF units are already on the ground in Rafa killing
dozens of people there, including kids.
He also said one of the units is the same
that killed seven world central kitchen workers.
- And just stop on that one point alone.
They're getting direct reporting from people in this room.
Which by the way, I'm not saying that means it's true,
but in what world are we not recognizing this like
seismic shift where people in the room that used
to be towing the lines everywhere are going,
we just got reports that they're already killing children
and they're already doing all the things
that you claim they've never done in Rafa.
Right? Now that's
because it's already happening and we can all see it.
I mean, that's shocking.
It's jarring because we've never
been in this position before.
And watch how he responds,
- Including in American, of course.
So he's saying the idea,
- Oh, and imagine the world ca central kitchen.
It's one of the groups that was involved with killing them
that they pretended to sanction and then never did.
And they're there killing children. That's what he just said
- On the ground in Rafa, killing dozens
of people there, including kids.
He also said one of the units is the same
that killed seven world central kitchen workers,
including an American of course.
So he's saying the IDF is already killing people
to sites point kind of, you know, in a way
that questions this line between major
and minor, um, operations.
And one of these units, um, is one
that essentially killed an American.
So how is the US letting is an Israeli unit
that killed an American now continue to kill Palestinians?
Like, is that not a red line? So I'm just not
- Able, and before we answers, remember that was the group
that we were talking about investigating.
So it's an ongoing investigation.
And and one guy even asked, well, one of them, you're still,
you haven't finished investigating,
but you're still arming them.
They're like, well, yeah, well,
and they just kind of walk away from it.
The point is, well that means you don't care if you know
that there's reports, they're committing crimes
and you fund them until you find out that's about as stupid
as saying keep taking those shots
until we find out if they're
dangerous, which is what happened.
At least they'll lie about AstraZeneca.
They yank it off and go, oh, sorry.
Turns out you were right for four years.
No, we, the point is that they didn't care if you,
it's not safe to continue using the thing
that seems like it might be until you find out
for sure that's agenda.
It's the same thing here. You don't give them weapons
until, until you find out.
Oh, now we know for sure there are clear allegations from
people standing as well
as evidence over the top everywhere about
how they're committing crimes
and they're still funding them.
That's the truth. Oops.
- Now continue to kill Palestinians.
Like, is that not a red line? So, so I'm
- Just not able to verify that report,
and since I'm not able to verify that report,
- I'm, that's always how it goes.
I haven't heard of that and I'm not
sure we'll talk about it later. I'm not able
- To comment on any implications of it.
- Okay. Uh, but conceivably, I mean, I I
- Co red line bottom line, I cannot,
I I can't verify that to be true.
So I can't talk about any understand possible
implications for something I don't know to be
- True. But just to follow up on that.
- So you are, he's actually arguing, we don't know for sure
that they've killed children
or the argument is that you assume every one
of them was a human shield, which even then, by the way,
going back to day one still does not justify it.
That's the true re that's the reality
of this ev Even if every single one of 'em is tied
to Hamas' legs, it is still collective
punishment the way they're carrying this out.
That's, that was the day one argument.
And it's still the same today.
They just, the government just ran
roughs shot right over the conversation.
They're still pushing. But the United Nations
and people involved like Francesca Albanese were very clear
about the provable reality of international law.
They don't care
- What is the latest on the unit
that did kill the world Central kitchen workers. Oh yeah.
- I don't have any updates to on that. Okay.
- Oh, sorry. We don't care. You mean
that investigation we'd asked you four weeks ago
that you just were still investigating
and now we don't know no update.
How much wanna that, that it never gets resolved,
like every other thing they put off.
- And then, um, secondly,
it's been 101 days now since him job
for family members medics sent to SRE were killed.
Um, so first question related to that is,
is is there an update on
the investigation into that attack? I
- I don't have anyone.
I'm happy to go back and get you the latest.
- Oh, that's buried mass graves the shooting of the people.
Oh yeah, we have to follow up on that.
Well, that's the same thing you said two weeks ago.
- Okay. So she's one of 14,000 kids killed.
Israeli forces have killed those essential
world central kitchen workers.
Of course there's a hundred more President Biden admits
Israel has killed civilians with US weapons.
We have the delay of them. And
- That's, that's right.
By the way, Biden himself on an interview admitted
that they have killed children.
You know, whether it's a byproduct
or not, isn't that enough?
Like, isn't that the reality is that this fairy clear
that they're now a beginning to admit some element of this.
And there's still, in a weird way,
the dynamic is Matt Miller still stands up
and acts like we have yet to verify a single crime.
So we're still investigating.
Biden just literally said it on news.
I mean, the point is, Biden I think is stumbling into
certain things like, like using the word occupation doesn't
change the fact that we can see it.
We could prove it. Memo
- As to whether or not, um, the US determines, uh,
whether Israel has, has violated national
law with all of this.
I understand, you know, there's been a
pause in one shipment of weapons.
You have said, you know, other shipments are to review.
But how did the US feel comfortable sending Israel
17 billion if we can't get answers to any of this, right?
And how can it justify sending
any more weapons at this point?
- Yeah, that's a logical question
that he won't answer with a logical answer.
But the point is that you just said we stopped one shipment.
That's the point. And we're reviewing the others.
Now, how do you even make sense of that?
What was the point with the one shipment?
Is that a unique shipment
that somehow is especially dangerous?
And if so, why is it even being used?
The point is that it's not, it's about a token.
You're making it look like you care.
You're hoping that other mindless media report
as we're stopping shipment.
That's not what's happening. You're not,
you're reviewing the others.
Okay, what's the difference
between shipment one and shipment two?
Why would one stop and then a very one next behind it?
Well, we're reviewing that one.
It's the same damn shipment of weapons.
It's the same concept, obviously the same point.
We're being manipulated. So
- Two things can be true at the same time.
And two things are true at the same time here.
One that we have do have concerns, uh, about certain ways
that Israel has conducted, uh, operations.
We've been open and forthright about those. We've
- Been, oh, we care.
We're concerned about it. But we haven't
done anything to stop it though.
But we're really concerned, guys. I'm really concerned.
Now here's some more weapons
- Engaged, uh, with the government
of Israel about ways they can improve their operations
to minimize civilian harm.
We've seen some, uh, we've seen them take some steps.
We haven't seen 'em take enough. And
- It's such hilarious.
Remember the beginning narrative was
that they're taking every measure of possible Funny
how that shifted, isn't it?
So every measure possible became you need to do more.
I'd love them to explain that discrepancy. Of
- Course that has led us to have concerns about
how a Roth operation would unfold.
That is one thing that's true.
The other thing is that's true, is
that we are committed to Israel's defense.
Israel is a democracy in the Middle East. That is a long
- .
Alright? So the other thing that's true
is we're gonna do it anyway.
So shut up. That's what I mean.
There's what's the meaning of that?
The other truth is that we're committed to doing it.
How do you even take that as anything li you just literally
said, we are concerned about these things
and the other truth is we don't care about
those things and we're gonna do it anyway.
, these guys, I mean, they must be
so completely trapped in their lies.
I know he feels uncomfortable.
I can see it in his face every time he does this
because you're, everybody in the room knows he's lying.
And even the people in that room that used
to show the lions are not asking questions like that.
They put him in a very uncomfortable position
and they make him look really dumb.
And he is not a dumb person. I mean,
he is actually much better at this than
KJP and plenty of others.
Even though that's White House, we're still talking about
the same propagandizing of the narrative.
Here's another one that's important.
I'm not gonna play the whole thing, I think,
but this is just a flashback.
First of all, of, remember, October 10th,
80 children have been killed 80.
And by the way, by October 10th, amnesty,
if you haven't seen this, I'm sure you have,
you watched the show had already come out with the,
or already finished by the way, it came out on the 20th.
Oh, I'm sorry it went to the 12th.
But they, you know, seventh of the 12th,
they already found out that Gaza was being,
war crimes are being committed, damning evidence
of war crimes as Israeli attacks wipe out.
Entire families proved it, but nobody cared, kept going.
'cause the US is a complete, you know,
we're talking about an
illegitimate government at this point.
It doesn't care about what its own people thinks,
let alone caring about civilian lives in the world.
But they were, when 80 people were killed, eight children,
just 80 children, you know,
we're at 15,000 plus at this point, his outrage about
how October 7th there are women and children and everything.
It was, which by the way, it's any human life matters,
apparently that's racist today.
That all lives matter. How is that racist?
The point is that it's crazy to see
that we're here in this position now
with more than 15,000 killed.
And we can't apply the same logic.
This has been an ongoing coverup from day one.
And by the way, it shouldn't surprise you.
That's what their job is, to obfuscate
- Has the right to defend itself.
It has the right to take action against the terrorists
who launched this brutal attack
and killed Israeli civilians.
It killed American civilians, killed mothers and children
and babies and kidnapped children.
- Nope, half of that's false.
And on top of that, we recognize that
you only care about the Americans taken from Israel,
but you don't care about the Americans.
Over 600 of them trapped in Gaza, many
of which are probably dead now.
Your go, your American US government disregarded
that Americans were trapped, some
of which weren't even from Palestine.
They were just American Palestinians
that were there visiting and got trapped, one
of which was killed, showing you the woman
who died in the, in the hospital bed.
They didn't even talk about that. Are they less American?
Because they are partly Palestinian.
Like these people don't care about any of that.
It, it's, it's a, it's the reality of what they are.
And what they pretend to be is what they think you want
- And what's his rail doing.
And so they're going to, they are going to take action to,
to respond to this terrorist attack. Do you
- Have any idea on the number of Palestinians killed
by Israel in the last four
- Days?
Uh, I have seen public reports. What are these?
I I'm, I am not gonna speak to the i,
so in the thousand the site I'm gonna speak to
what the US government can verify, which I've done
with the number of US citizens.
I will let Israel speak to the number of Israeli citizens
that have killed as well as a cop
of Palestinians that have killed.
Did you acknowledge that 80 Palestinian
- Children have been killed?
Do you acknowledge that? Will
- You?
And by the way, this is why I think we never see Max in
there anymore because we,
you get the right dynamic in there.
You know, Matt Lee Saeed, our Kat, you get Sam Husseini
and ma and, and and, and uh, uh, max Blumenthal.
And all of a sudden you get this dynamic where
Matt can't just bull rush over people.
Matt Lee or Matt Miller.
And the point is that clearly when you watch
how this goes next, it's in, he, he, he could only try
to act like you're being, you know,
show some decorum and, you know, shut up over there.
I'm trying to act until you keep going.
And he's forced eventually to answer the questions.
That's why I don't think there, some of these people,
I'm surprised they still let people like any of those three,
or there's four still in there.
I don't think I haven't seen Max in a while.
But Sam Saeed
and Matt Lee, I'm surprised they let all of them in there
because they're constantly asking
questions that make him look stupid.
But Sam in particular, by the way,
'cause I think he does an amazing job in here,
and I, I'm surprised they still let him back in.
And we actually talked about that in our interview
with Sam a while back.
But watch how this goes. Do even
- Acknowledge that, let me finish,
- Baby - Palestinian children killed
- This week. Again, babies,
- Do you acknowledge - That?
You asked, you asked a question.
I will answer the question. Okay, well,
- That's my - Question.
Israel has the right
to secure its country the way any country does.
It has the right to defend itself against terrorism.
It has the right to hold terrorists accountable.
Uh, and I will say, uh, ultimately the,
the Hamas terrorists who launched these operations,
there is no one who has more disregard
for Palestinian civilian life than this terrorists.
You should, those terrorists, lemme finish the people,
lemme finish the, killed those terrorists in 50
- Palestinians, - Mostly civilian bombing,
residential towers bombing.
Have a lot of offices, seem, have a lot of new people.
I terrorists launched this activity knowing
that there would be retaliation, knowing
that Israel would have to defend itself as any country did,
knowing that it would lead
to the unfortunate loss of civilian. Theyre
- Not seeking the release of
Palestinian, Palestinian captives and
- Prisons.
Did, lemme go, go ahead.
- It's amazing. So, so baby killing is okay here.
Why can't you acknowledge the death?
So baby killing is okay here. You can't even acknowledge
- It.
We, we always, uh,
we always mourn the loss of civilian life.
It is an un it is an unfortunate circumstance
every time it happens.
And as I just said, the, the Hamas terrorists
who launched this terrorist attack, knowing
that it would produce the loss of,
of not just direct Israeli lives,
who they took in their incursions across the border,
but also the loss of Palestinian civilian life.
- Oh, so as I said before, your argument is, you know
that they're genocidal, right?
You knew that Israel would kill civilians.
So it's on you , stop hitting yourself.
Like, so, you're literally making the argument that
because Israel is so belligerently willing
to kill civilians, that it's Hamas' fault
for even pushing them into doing it.
Like, I can't even believe the la the lack
of logic to that argument.
You know, and all the, I mean the, like,
as you just see there, the kind of pushback
where he gets forced to come back to answer the question.
And I, I, I just love that. Anyway, in the interest
of time, I'm gonna keep going.
I wanna wrap this up here in regard to Rafa.
And last two points here. Saul makes a good point.
That heavy shelling in Rafa this morning,
which is yesterday, which by the way, the bombing
of Rafa has been going on long before this.
As much as people are only now seeing it in some cases.
The bombing has been going on long
before they claim they were beginning of the invasion.
Don't forget that. But they write, notice
how Western politicians are now saying the Red Lion is a
full or major offensive, which by the way,
those are random metrics.
They're not, they're not metrics full
or major versus partial.
It's, it's just a game of words.
The point is, they're going in,
they're bombing, they're killing people.
This is going, it's the gate.
This is them trying to pretend that Israel doing it,
even though they didn't want them to.
And somehow they're on the same page. It's not.
Israel did it. They didn't wanna,
at least outwardly claimed they didn't want them
to, and they did it anyway.
And now they're going, well, it's not a full invasion.
So we're on the same page.
It's, it's embarrassing, which allows Israel
to get on with the killing.
So long as everybody agrees, it's only a partial slaughter.
It's just embarrassing. It's gross. And I want Ms.
Rahi points out Israeli media reports about briefings from
high level sources that quote,
the Operation Rafa is going on in full force.
So you have is, this is an Israeli reporting from Israel,
and he is saying Israeli high level sources are openly
saying that it's a full force operation.
As always, it's ridiculous
that your government blatantly lies to you to support
and protect a foreign entity at your expense, at the expense
of everybody else in regard to Gaza and anywhere else.
In fact, I mean, who,
who is this government actually fighting for at this point?
They're hiding the truth from you
for the interest of somebody else.
It says, if demonstrations don't become extremely disruptive
in the near future, and if life in the West doesn't become
unbearable by this time next, next year,
Israel will have killed a million Gaza's.
That's 1 million. He says,
only two things can stop the Usis Israeli Holocaust,
major civil unrest in the West,
or a wider regional war that will shatter life in Israel.
He says, neither Israel nor the US are stopping it
before Gaza has no more Palestinians in it.
He says, and this will be controversial,
this is a final solution in all caps.
This is an Israeli Jew reporting from Israel
shouldn't make any difference to the truth,
but it does for some people.
Now, eared human rights monitor highlights some pretty
horrifying realities.
Now here forward, you're gonna see some,
some somewhat graphic things to just keep that in mind.
If you've got children watching investigation by ed,
human rights group, field teams have revealed
that Israeli Army's commission
of a mass killing crime against a Palestinian family while
evacuating in Gaza without justification
or necessity, like all the rest of them,
resulting in the death of 12 of its members,
including women and children.
-
- The podcast, it's just showing dead bodies
- Scattered - Around the street,
executed by these Israeli army with two missiles directly
fired by a drone, an area that was not witnessed in,
by the way the drone had been supplied by
- Groups like - College example.
Like I, they are funding these program
12 5 4 children media
- Forced to evacuate their homes and then bomb in the tree.
Just like with you telling
The reality guys, is this happens constantly.
That's the sad reality of this.
This happens nonstop over and over.
Now here's an interesting overlap to this.
Now I'm thinking, let's see what time we got.
Yeah, we should be good. I'm gonna, this is,
I think this is an important back and forth.
Now, uh, we talked about this on pasta show,
and I think Pierce Morgan is not somebody
honest in this conversation.
He's just not, I mean, the guy, he, he,
he positions are constantly weak and,
and in a weird backhanded way,
almost in some cases supporting the same agenda while
acting like he's fighting it.
But nonetheless, this clip is a, is a, an important point.
The one I said on poster show is the same thing.
That this is not a brave moment.
This is Pierce Morgan acknowledging the shockingly
self-evident thing that the rest of the media's ignoring,
sort of like the reverse of
what Joe Scarborough's doing, right?
Well, everybody in the media,
the international community all says the same.
So yeah, well, you're wrong and they're all wrong.
Or really the point is they're all knowingly lying
and that's the bigger picture.
So in this case, what he's doing is calling out this guy
for the obvious circular logic that he's putting forward
the obvious reality that
what he's saying if when turned the other way, proves
that they either don't care about civilian casualties
or they're not even bothering to look while they're counting
what they claim are Hamas members.
But the truth is, we know that's not happening
because they're just throwing out numbers.
And I think that's what this really shows.
But even Pierce Morgan pushed on this, and I think it's
because this has been something
that is shockingly obvious from the very beginning.
So either this was an organized effort
to make it look like this is happening,
or in any case, it's peers taking advantage of something
that they know we all know,
because I get you, he's
getting comments and emails about it.
'cause it's that ridiculously obvious.
Nonetheless, it is still fantastic
to see an Israeli representative put on the spot like this
and held to it for what, four minutes.
It made him very uncomfortable.
But, and this is what real journalism to a would,
would look like if this was actually what was going on,
constantly being done in the same way.
What needs to happen?
- How many civilians do you believe you've killed?
- We, we don't have exact figures
as you know, it's the fog of war,
- But you've got exact numbers
for Hamas terrorists you've killed.
Why wouldn't you know how many civilians you've killed?
- Because obviously our focus is to go
after the Hamas terrorists
and, uh, . Well, hang on.
- I mean, that does imply that you, you are putting a bigger
premium on killing Hamas terrorists in terms of numbers
and accountability than you are on innocent civilians.
That can't be right. Surely if you know exactly
how many Hamas terrorists you've killed, you must know
how many civilians you've killed.
Otherwise, you're prioritizing the lives
of terrorists over innocent people,
- Peers with respect.
Don't put words into my mouth, please.
I didn't say exactly 14,000, I said around 14,000.
Whereas Kama will come out with precise, uh, numbers
that statisticians will look, look at,
- Gimme a ballpark number for civilians.
- Well, well, of course you can.
You can use the ballpark, uh, as far as, uh,
the Hamas figures, which I reject as being false. Well,
- If they're false, why would you gimme those,
- Right? I have what a ridiculous claim.
- I gave you the numbers that I had. No, you've
- Told me.
You know, you know how many Hamas terrorists you've killed,
but you don't even have any idea
how many civilians you killed.
I'm just bemused. Why wouldn't you keep count of both?
- I, I don't have that information to give you, uh,
pi, if I did, I would. Well,
- You literally no idea how
many civilians you've been killing.
- I can tell you definitively that our aim is to go
after Hamas on done
- Hang, I, I sorry to push on this.
That's quite extraordinary. No, you're not.
You're an official spokesman for the Israeli government
and you have no idea how many civilians you've killed.
I thought you just told me that you were particularly
careful about not killing civilians.
But if you dunno how many you've killed, how can you say
that with any, that's certainty.
- That's basic self-evident life. That's
- Even if few years ago by a ratio of the Hamas figures,
we would still be far ahead of any Western
- Army.
That wasn't my question. You know, it wasn't my question.
- I I don't, I don't have the information. Well, you literal
- Have no idea how many civilians you've killed.
- It. It's not that. I don't know.
I'm not authorized to give the information.
I don't have the information. No, that's
- Com that's completely nononsense.
Why are you authorized to gimme the number
of terrorists you've killed, but not a number of civilians?
I don't understand
- in, in, you know, a couple years ago this,
that would've ended it right there.
- Pi we will go after FMAs.
We will ensure that we, um, but you
- Want me to believe you're being incredibly careful about
how many civilians you're killing
and you have an amazing exemplary record,
but you don't know how many civilians you're killing.
So how do I know you've been careful?
- Piss when the dust settles,
we will come out with the proper numbers.
Hamas run the press daily with
- False, when the dust settles, a lot
of people will have died.
And you know how many Hamas you've killed,
but you don't know how many civilians you killed.
And I'm just asking you why, why is it you've kept a record
of one but not the other?
- They know both. They don't know either.
- Personally, I personally don't have
that information to give to you.
You can ask me over and over.
I'm not gonna come up with more
information. I don't personally, you
- Dunno, authorized - I don't have the information piece.
- But you're an official government spokesman
for the Israeli government and you have no idea.
- You said he was not authorized. I
- I I came on here to focus
on what's going on with the world. Well,
- Actually you came on here to answer my
questions, I think. Yeah.
- And, and I I don't have an answer for you for that. So,
- And I didn't intend to press you on this point
because I assumed that you would not respond the way you
have, but I've never apologize an Israeli spokes when you
simply said, I I've no idea.
Particularly after you've boasted about the fact you've been
very smart in the way you've avoided killing civilians.
How do you know if you've got no idea who you'd killed?
- How do you claim that? - Because I know the way in which
the IDF operates.
I know God, um, the way in which we go
after the terrorists in the best possible way.
It's not what I've said. It's what General Pat said.
Amazing. It's what, um, John Spencer from,
uh, west Point has said.
It's, it, it's what's, uh, multiple, uh,
British generals have said Israel goes out of its way
to avoid civilian casualties.
That's what we'll do. If you can point to me to another, um,
conflict by which they have, um, evacuated, got out
of harm's way, civilians, to the extent Israel has done,
- If - I'm sorry with respect, Mr.
Diamond, how can you possibly expect me
to accept any comparisons to any other conflict
or war given that you do not know
how many civilians you've killed
- Pi you understand that, uh, I can't, uh,
prosecute the war over the, over the media. I can't just
- The basic, basic information, I'm just, it's honestly,
I'm just, I I'm not trying to trap you
and I'm not trying to unfairly harangue you.
I think people are watching this
and they'll make their own conclusions.
I just find it astonishing that the moment I asked you
how many Hamas you killed, you could tell me immediately.
And the moment I ask you about civilians,
you haven't got a clue literally
that you're not even prepared to issue a ballpark number.
And I, I think people will find that staggering,
particularly given that you are insistent
that you are doing everything you can
to avoid killing civilians.
To which again, I just simply ask,
how do you know if you dunno how many you're killing,
how can you possibly be sure that you are a,
doing better than other, other people waging war elsewhere,
or b, that you have any idea
how many you're killing you, you don't clearly,
- And the, and the other point, where's that buzz?
How many time? Many, sorry. Right?
I mean, is that, so you, you're, I mean, the real,
the the major overlap there is that you're,
you either know both or you don't know either.
And I think it's obvious that
what they're doing is indiscriminately bombing everywhere
and then just racking.
And by the way, this was actually proven right
in the beginning, right?
There's a beginning aspect of this where they came out,
and this was proven, I think the
cradle did a coverage on this.
I think it might have been Mon Weiss,
where they highlighted the fact that all they were doing,
and this was easily proven,
where taking the casualty numbers
and then reporting that in Israel as here's
how many terrorists we've killed.
That's not, that's easy to understand this.
We're talking like that's what, here's the equivalent of
that today we've killed 50,000 terrorists.
That's not what they're saying anymore,
because that's so obvious.
But that's what they were doing in Israel
because they claim 50,000 deaths.
So what did that show you? That means
that they either don't know,
they're just calling them all terrorists
or they don't even care to check.
And we know that's what's happening,
is they're calling them all terrorists, Amalek
and posting videos about murdering 'em in
the back and I mean constantly.
And so Pierce Morgan doing that,
I think was a very important moment just
because it was so shocking to the average person to see
that if you have the smallest amount of, of,
it's not even intelligence, it's like just deductive logic.
You can stand back and go, okay,
what Pierce just said there is easy to understand.
You can't say you, we've done more than any other war
before this, and then act like you don't know,
or you're unwilling to tell us the amount
of civilian casualties
and then say that even with we don't know that,
that we're supposed to assume
that you just know that number.
And it is less than other wars.
I mean, it's just let's blind support, which is
what most of these places are doing.
Even Pierce in in other, every other circumstance.
It just shows you that most of the media is complicit.
And I don't even think it's
because they think they support genocide.
It's because they just, they're somewhere in them.
Their job is to go along
with whatever narrative they're supposed to go along with.
I don't even know if they like outwardly
acknowledge that in most cases.
I know some of them do. But that's
what this mainstream corporate media does, guys.
And here is what y Jonas, Tara is, uh, reporting.
As of yesterday, at least 20 Palestinians murdered
after Israeli war planes bombed Abo Sharia's family home in
Saba, neighborhood children, women killed.
I mean, this is, I'm just gonna show you selective examples,
but this is a constant moment to moment, day
after day, nonstop reality for Gaza.
But in particular right now, Rafa, the whole place
where they claim they needed a plan.
New Israeli massacre in Gaza City.
This was the eighth claimed 13 lives, mostly children.
A heinous military operation in southern Rafa,
continual bombing guys, one after another.
Here's an American ger.
American and German rockets are incinerating the
bodies of Palestinian children.
I can't, this is the worst part for me.
These children that have been,
their skin had been burned off.
You know, the children that was crying
and calling for his father who couldn't even hug him
because his whole body is burned.
I mean, this is sc this is the stuff that will sit with us
for the rest of our lives.
And it's the fault of the people who like Lindsey Graham
and the rest of the government
that are acting like this is not real.
Or acting like these are human shields
and lying about everything that's going on while calling
for more weapons support.
This is Syrian girl reporting
where the million dollar Holocaust Museum, what,
where are the million dollar Holocaust
museums that will show this?
The, the, the line of dead children,
the children being pulled out of rubble, the bodies
that are being shown that are not tied to somebody's leg,
that are simply in a room that were murdered inside
of a building that nobody wants to acknowledge.
Now, here's a report from CNN
and it's the same point we're making guys
that this is even coming out through corporate media.
And even this, by the way, is this is in many ways
varying larger truths.
But as long as I can get people to see
who might not have already seen it,
that whether it's corporate media
or anybody else, that they are murdering innocent people.
They are treating Palestinians like they're terrorists.
Whether or not they have any information about that,
that is a step in the right direction.
Oh yeah, I forgot. I don't wanna wor
bother you with the background stuff.
Hold on. I have to delete something.
Still give me trouble here.
So as this loads, I want, this is again,
A-C-A-N-N report, which, you know, take that with a grain
of salt that it, you know, the salt lick that we should take
with anything coming from corporate media.
But the reality is it's titled Strapped down,
blindfolded held in diapers, Israeli whistleblowers,
detail abuse of Palestinians in shadowy detention centers.
And this is happening everywhere. And we keep seeing this.
And what do you get from the people online?
The same old people I point at every time,
look at all the terrorists that the hum,
that Mossad captured.
Look at all the terrorists that came out of their holes.
Eli, David or Elon Levy or all the rest of them say, right.
And every single time you can come back
and prove that most of them, if not all of them,
were in no way connected.
And I only say most because there's
ones that they claim hermas.
Not to say that I even think
that the point is even they let go.
Most of them claiming they were.
But what they do in the first place,
they tortured them, they threatened them.
There's videos of them showing how they do that
and proudly showing it.
And people like Elon Levy
and the rest will act like in the first place.
We know they're all terrorists.
How is the average person not capable,
not able to piece that together?
Most of us are,
- It's a place the Israeli military doesn't want us to see
- How Palestinian color isn't there.
- Who are you? Gimme please. Now we can
- How on, what is it that you want?
- Oh, my card. - But
CNN has gained exclusive evidence
of Palestinian prisoner abuse
from multiple Israeli whistleblowers
At the Set Man facility in southern Israel.
We joined human rights activists amid growing public concern
for the detainees being held inside.
This is a protest by Israeli citizens outside
a detention center close to Gaza, where we know hundreds
of Palestinians have been held.
You can see it's a closed military facility.
It's behind the barb wire fence.
We're not permitted access
and there's hostility from passes by.
We just had somebody drive past in a car
and they shouted out to us in Hebrew.
Yeah, you are defending murderers.
No, we're defending. What do you annual expect?
- No, we we're defending basic human rights
- And eyewitnesses are now speaking out
away from the military facility near the
beaches of Tel Aviv.
One young Israeli army reservist agreed
to speak about schools of detainees.
At Sedman.
He says, are kept in cages or pens, constantly shackled
and blindfolded.
Many for weeks on end. We've hidden
- Palestinians, not Hamas members
- To shield him from prosecution.
- We were told they're not allowed
to move and must sit upright.
They're not allowed to talk or peek under their blindfolds.
- And what happened if they, if they did do that?
So what kind of punishments would we add?
- We were allowed to pick out problematic people
and punish them, having them stand with their hands
above their heads for an unlimited time.
If they didn't keep their hands up,
we could zip tie them to the fence.
- The Israeli military says detainees are handcuffed based
on their risk level and health status.
But the account tallies with photographic evidence obtained
by CNN of Palestinian detainees inside C
- Like Guantanamo.
Now guys, they torture them just because they're there
- By dozens of Palestinians released back into Gaza
was zip tied and blindfolded says this former detainee
and tortured in a way I never imagined
one source telling us the restraints were so tight they had
to amputate a man's hand.
- It's happened a lot by the way.
- The express is that, you know how,
how do you think Israeli hostages are treated by Hamas?
- This sentiment was voiced in the facility,
but I think that if Hamas is so abominable, which I agree
with, then why use Hamas as a bar?
It's a descent into dehumanization.
- A dissent. That's what I mean accelerated
since the rampage by Hamas on October the seventh last year,
the killing and abduction to Gaza of hundreds
of Israelis provoked outrage
and a brutal response made.
Mid Israel's Roth, tens of thousands
of Palestinians have been killed
and thousands detained for interrogation, transported
to facilities like ced Man,
where one Israeli guard now tell CNN prisoners
are routinely beaten.
We've hidden his identity and voice too.
- You can take them out and hit them maybe four
or five times with a club.
It's not dying in the face. So you don't see blood.
The detainees lie belly down being hit.
Oh my god, people's screaming and dogs barking at them.
It's terrifying. Some detainees are taken away
and beaten really hard.
So bones and teeth are broken.
- So you, you, you saw people who are subject
to these beatings who had their bro bones broken
and who had their teeth broken.
- Yes, it's a practice which commanders know about.
They want intelligence, but they also want revenge
and punishment for what happened on October 7th.
- Can we ask, the Israeli military hasn't approved
CNN's requests for access to set, man that the gates
of the facility, we challenged these Israeli guards
- Having Palestinian power in their right.
Do you know if they're being handcuffed?
Are they being blindfolded? No. No.
- This is a facility - As we leave
masked soldiers approach. Hello,
- You stop please.
I'm filming this first of the Army.
So who are you?
- Now? Imagine what happened if the went in.
- Please now give please. Now hang on.
- What is it? Yeah, democracy, right? First press freedom.
- Then - Imagine if they weren't cnn.
Imagine if it was a Palestinian group
journalist. You know, we're
- Driving now to meet one Israeli with personal experience
of the Sade Tame Man facility.
It's experience that he says
has left him shocked at the condition
and the medical treatment of Palestinian detainees there.
Hello? He told us he treated Palestinian detainees
with gunshot wounds fresh from the war zone in Gaza,
but was appalled that the lack of equipment and expertise.
- The problem is Gaan, who are brought in,
are labeled as terrorists.
And it is very popular opinion over here
that terrorists deserve to die.
So they do not deserve the same medical
care as everyone else.
- Satellite imagery obtained by CNN shows
how the steady demand facility was expanded
after the October 7th attacks with detention facilities
and makeshift medical bays being added
after public hospitals in Israel refused
to treat injured guards and suspects.
- Wow, - Eyewitness accounts describe a field hospital
with 15 to 20 patients, virtually naked
and blindfolded with hands and feet shackled to their beds
and wearing diapers.
What eyewitness told CNN painful procedures were carried out
by underqualified medics treatment.
The medical work. Chris,
- This, how is this not like Nazi Germany style stuff.
Guys, this is not a hard thing to wrap your mind around.
- Total vulnerability, if you imagine being unable to move,
being unable to see what's going on, that's something
that borders if not crosses into psychological torture.
- The Israeli military says prisoners are stripped
for security checks
and that investigations are opened when there's suspicion
of misconduct still accounts from Israelis
and Palestinians inside.
And the shocking images paint a disturbing picture.
Matthew Chance CNN had set in Southern Israel,
- Right?
Let's not forget that We're talking about things like
Guantanamo Bay where we saw very similar treatment.
Where do you think that training
and overlap came from, right?
It goes both ways. But let's realize there's a reason
these things look the same.
And it's horrifying to me
that we act like this isn't happening.
Like this is for crying out loud.
This is CNN and that doesn't mean that, I mean that
because they say it, that makes it true.
It's shocking to see this on such a high level corporate
outlet that's highlighting the things
that in real time the government and Israel's government
and a lot of the people around the power structures are
screaming, is fake news and racism and or so is CNN
and Jew hating outlet now.
Like how do you make sense of that without realizing
that we're being lied to?
I know you guys know this, 99% of what you just heard in
that CNN clip, you've already heard from me.
The point is that this is important to see the shift,
the shift in the conversation.
So here is highlighting this image by the way,
where you can see the torture of these people.
And he reiterates, and this is, uh, Omar Shaki saying,
and he's from Human Rights Watch saying,
amputated limbs due to over cuffing.
Guys, this has has been an ongoing reality since long
before October 7th, but it's been not coverage since then.
Stripped detainees and diapers fed through straws, which
by the way means they're letting them defecate in their bed
because they have a diaper on.
This is torture we're talking about.
And of course, here's what Jared Smith says, can't wait
for the to, for the expose on Hamas treatment
of its hostages and other detainees.
Like these people are just, I mean,
who knows if this is a bot or whatever else,
but the point is, this is somebody
who can't even acknowledge what's right in front of you
because you're acting like, well, Hamas would be worse,
would be the assumption that by the way, there's a mountain
of evidence proving right now
that's not what's happening to them.
And the, and again, I don't even need to go into it.
15 different people
that have come back from Gaza are now telling us
to this very day that they were treated kindly,
that they were given food, that they weren't tortured.
And yet this guy, all he can do is go,
I can't wait for you to do this over here.
What? Why? Let's even say you think that's important.
Maybe it is. Can you not at least go time out?
I can't support what they're doing.
No, because they don't care about Palestinians.
It's self-evident. There's no
way you can ignore something like that.
And don't forget, this is now the second time from a
corporate outlet that we have an IDF members.
Members. In one case there's,
and I think this, there was more than one,
this was an individual from the IDF in this case
who have blown the whistle
and told you openly crimes are being committed.
Here's just the opening clip that I shared with this guy.
You should definitely watch the entire show.
- Do you think that you witnessed war crimes taking place?
- Probably, probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas,
and then if you go this way, you're bound
to kill people that are not.
- Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he says he witnessed.
What kind of stuff would they say?
- There are no uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life,
- Deniable.
Now, look, you can dispute the breadth of it,
how many times it's happening and how many are doing it.
But this is going on,
and that means the US government, the Israeli government,
and everybody else behind it, gaslighting,
are actively hiding crimes they know are being committed.
This is channel four in the uk. Mainstream media.
Hertz has covered it countless times.
They've called out the lies of the
Hannibal Direct or the, the truth.
The Hannibal directed the lies around October 7th.
It just keeps going.
They keep dragging this zombie genocide narrative forward,
or the rather the zombie narrative
around the hiding the genocide.
The point is the IDF whistleblower
has admitted institutional war crimes that they've seen it,
and now another one's coming out.
And how, I mean, and with all the evidence we have,
I can't believe this is actually still ongoing.
Uh, Jonni also points out this going back.
He's been covering this from the very beginning,
showing you the lies about this.
But here's more images, more documentation in Con un showing
dozens of Palestinians kidnapped treated the same.
These aren't terrorists. These are not Hamas members.
Now, here's a sad reality talking about the Nazi overlap,
guys, but what you're about to see here
is pretty shocking to me.
Now, these are the people. I argue that, that there are,
you know, I only say I argue 'cause I don't know
that they've all voluntarily went here.
But then I argue are the people
that at the very least have been driven
or chose to move along to the place they drove them to, just
because they know that Israel's gonna bomb Rafa.
But the problem is that they also know they're gonna bomb
'em along the way and they're gonna bomb where they go.
But may, you know, for whatever reason,
and I, I can't dispute that, who knows what's safer?
I don't. They would probably know better than me
that they choose to go along
with what Israel's asking of them.
But just look at how this looks
to you as uncover points out.
This is not a Nazi concentration camp in World War
II in 1945.
This is Gaza concentration camp in 2024 as they write,
A holocaust is happening right before our eyes.
And the world is silent, never again.
Apparently means nothing to people
unless you're talking about Zionists.
But watch what this looks like.
- This is an Israeli jeep driving by.
You get all these people just huddle together, fearful
babies and people and crutches.
I mean, God damnit, this is
- The worst thing in the, it's - Just so
- Horrifying to watch these people.
They, these people have been driven from their homes,
they've been, family members have been killed.
They've probably, some of them been raped and abused
and tortured, and they're just,
you need pushed from place to place.
And this is not supposed to be a problem for people.
This is unprecedented in my mind, guys.
This is overwhelming. Here's what, here's
what Blinken says about the various rarely units
that they pretended they were gonna sanction.
Blinken says this rarely units accused
of serious violations.
No, they've done enough to avoid sanctions.
They've done enough. And you know what that means?
Community service. The Secretary of State told Congress
that Israel had adequately punished a soldier
who got community service
for killing an unarmed Palestinian.
That's not a joke, that's not a parody.
That's not the Babylon bee.
This is the, this is Blinken from the United States
openly on the record with ProPublica saying, well,
they gave the guy community service
so he shouldn't be charged with a crime
for killing an unarmed Palestinian.
I can't even, I mean, I was,
I I I almost fell outta my chair with this, not
because I know I don't know this, but
because I can't believe that they're becoming so blatant,
so on the surface with their open hatred for Palestinians.
Or maybe they don't even realize it.
As she says, the only reason Blinken thinks community
service for murder, which he's not even denying
is adequate punishment, is
because he doesn't think Palestinians are human beings.
I don't know how you think otherwise.
I don't know how you don't see exactly what she's saying.
I completely agree. Here is
what a representative from South Africa, the one
that was leading the International criminal court
accusations the truth of the genocide.
Here's what she has to say.
If an African leader, I'd committed 1% of
what Netanyahu has done
or the entire Israeli government is complicit in,
and the United States government as well
and warrant would've been issued
several months ago. And we all know that
- The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction
over the situation in Palestine.
And we have previously called on the office
of the prosecutor to urgently lead a Farrah
and impartial investigation into this matter.
One that complies with international legal standards
to establish the facts
and bring those responsible to justice.
If all of this were happening in Africa,
they would've already issued warrants.
It took three weeks to issue warrants on Putin,
seven months, nothing on Prime Minister
netting and his ministers.
Of course, you'd have seen in reports today
that the prosecutor of the ICC has received, like me
a letter from congressmen who have indicated
that if you dare to issue a warrant, we will deal with you.
Same letter I have received.
- That's just so crazy.
They'll, they'll, they'll deal with you.
What do you think that means? Those people like Tom Cotton,
people like to uh, uh, Cruz.
What the God I'm the worst memory right now today, Tom.
Um, for some reason, Tom,
of course obviously jumped into my head that, you know,
and it's Senator Cruz, Marco Rubio,
uh, forget the, no.
And they, and they were right in line with this.
Why can't I remember Rubio or, uh, Cruz's first name?
Who cares? The point is
that they all happily signed onto a letter
that was openly belligerently threatening people
who were trying to do their jobs.
Ted Cruz, thank you. The cradle writes,
and this is in regard to Lebanon, even guys.
So as they're trying, as Lindsey Graham is trying
to frame this, as you know, they're all attacking Israel.
By the way, Israel's illegally occupying every single one
of these areas other than Iran, right?
In Kohe in Syria, parts of Lebanon, all of Gaza.
I mean, it's ridiculous,
but it says several casualties in Israel's bombing
of even southern Lebanon.
You know, just because you're arguing
that Lebanon is responding,
who has a legal right to arm resistance?
Show me the casualties. Lindsey Graham,
all he's doing is blatantly ignoring the fact
that Ev Israel is bombing Lebanon
and killing innocent people,
which has happened more than once,
including a journalist from Reuters
that was killed right in the beginning that none
of them cared about, that we talked about.
And it took Reuters even four days to claim that,
even though we proved it right in the first day.
Yet again, demonstrating our value.
The point is
that they don't care about the killing of people.
They care about the narratives they're trying to push.
And you're gonna get upset most likely
when you realize this happened.
Even the illusion of accountability has now gone away.
The Biden administration, the report
on whether Israel was violating US law,
which Matt Miller has used to delay, we we're investigating.
We'll come back when we finish our report. Remember?
He, he kept, says it every time. Guess what?
They have now, delayed it indefinitely.
I mean, guys, they're just pulling the mask off.
We ask, we're criminals. Shut up.
We don't care what you think, right?
Like, I don't know if this is being goaded on by Israel
or if they're just think realizing, you know what,
the cast outta the bag, who cares?
Let's just pr let's just treat them like authoritarian
governments openly do.
'cause that's what we are. Just kill them when they protest.
You know, whatever else. You can't delay the report about
the crimes that you claim will justify
or not what's happening indefinitely
and act like we don't recognize what that shows us.
That you are cowards
and you don't care about what's going on.
Disgusting. And of course this, uh,
Saul Rod is pointing out what he said
before, we will always defend human rights at home
and abroad, except when it comes to Israel is
what the finishing statement should be
or anything that challenges their
narratives of what they really think.
The cradle also reports Netanyahu.
And this gets to finish quickly pointing out the continuing
desire to occupy.
And I mean like boots on the ground,
occupy using building legal settlements
occupy the rest of Gaza.
'cause legally it's still completely occupy in the area,
which nobody with a brain would deny.
Point is Netanyahu wants quote the demilitarized civilian
rule in Gaza with EU with UAE and Saudi help.
What that really translates
to is our complete control over the entire thing
until we get what we want
or we claim that there's still terrorists
and pretend that never mattered exactly
what's happened over and over in the past.
And I'll show you that before we finish.
Be Selem highlights the fact that they're still un they're,
they're demolishing homes in the West Bank.
They're demolishing homes in Gaza. And guess what?
They're demolishing homes in Israel. That's right.
So you to realize this is not about anything other than
getting rid of non Zionist.
Anybody rather, rather specifically in this case from the
Jewish supremacist mindset that even bet SEL calls out.
But again, I the Zionist driven reality,
they're now removing people they don't see in line
with their ideology says
as described BET S 2021 position, pa position paper.
And guys, this is an Israeli human rights group.
The Israeli apartheid regime implements policies
to promote the principle of Jewish supremacy on both sides
of the green line in the occupied West Bank
and inside Israel sovereign territory.
This is from Oren Ziv,
who is a journalist from 9 7 2 magazine, Israeli outlet.
Israeli forces demolished the entire Bedouin village
of Wadi Khalil in the Negev NB leaving over
300 people without housing.
They don't care about these people.
And you realize all they just say is it's illegal.
And the point is, it's because they've never given these
people permits for places that they are asking
for, same as anywhere else.
So they can later look back and go, it's illegitimate
and just push them out of the way.
Why at least as bet SM is arguing
because it's a Jewish supremacist mindset
that in my opinion is driven by Zionism.
Now here's the places we're talking about.
Israel destroys dozens of Bedwin homes in the gv.
Now Roberts written about the Bedwin
population for a long time.
Just so we understand what we're talking about is this is in
the Negev Desert and we're talking about Israel,
not West Bank, not Gaza.
So just understand that this is not some unique
Hamas only problem, guys.
This is how they treat anybody they see as their adversary,
not honest people we're talking about here.
Max Blumenthal highlights. And this is what he said.
This is first what they say here.
This photo is not from the Gaza envelope on October 7th.
This destroyed Holmes area. These are people's homes.
This is y this is, uh, nor nor are they continue nor
after a pilgrim instigated
by Jewish settlers in the West Bank,
which has also happened.
This photo was taken yesterday in the eighth,
a 15 minute drive from Beersheba.
And Max writes, Israeli police destroyed
yet another Bedouin village in the Negev on the grounds
that it was unrecognized.
Though the residents of wa wadi, uh,
Wadi al Khalil are Israeli citizens, though
Israeli citizens, guys just like the Orthodox Jews,
they're also Israeli citizens.
If they beat up every time they talk about Zionism.
But his point is they are being ethnically cleansed off
their land because they're not Jewish.
How do we think this is something that's okay,
even if it's only about Judaism,
which I believe it's more about Zionism
and it's the Judaism manipulation.
But I could be wrong. The bottom line is that
how do people not recognize that this is ethnonationalism,
that this is colonial settle,
everything we've talked about, these aren't buzzwords.
These are what they openly are.
It's what they previously have claimed.
They are a col, a settler colonialism project.
This is ethnic cleansing and on full display.
Now, on an overlap with that, and this is also in Jerusalem.
Francesca Albanese highlights this first, the, uh,
direct commissioner general of Unre highlights this evening.
And this was on the ninth Israeli residents.
So just random Israeli residents, likely led
by legal settlers by the way.
'cause that's what usually pushes this forward.
They set fire to the perimeter of a,
of an a United Nations headquarter building
for UN NRA in occupied East Jerusalem.
There's zero accountability for this stuff.
This is the way, this is not some Hamas headquarters.
This is an East Jerusalem.
This is a, in a UN headquarters that is like the idea
that Hamas is everywhere is just
an illusion that's being spun.
You could argue that UN might have con,
I personally would argue that about the UN body in general.
But they have not produced any evidence that un r is part
of Hamas or from October 7th involved.
The US and Canada
and even Germany have called this tion,
I believe it was Germany, but many of their allies,
this took place while UN r
and other UA UN agency staff were on the compound.
While there are no casualties among the staff,
the fire caused extensive damage headquarters on its ground,
on on its ground, a petrol and
and diesel station for the agency's fleet of cars.
So it's affecting their ability to then do other things
as well, which is probably the point.
They'll turn around and blame them
for not delivering things now
because they, this is how this works.
Our director with the help of other staff had
to put out the fire themselves and took
and it took the Israeli fire extinguishers
and police police a while before they even turned up.
Not a surprise, a crowd accompanied by armed men.
That's my point. Were witnessed
outside the compound chanting burned
down the United Nations.
These are all public guys
and these are being ignored by the very people
who always tell you to look to
the people like the United Nations.
Here's what Francesca wrote.
She says, I used to work exactly in that compound,
exactly in that small building which sits facing
the compound's gas station.
Now is she a member of Hamas?
You gotta be pretty dumb to make these arguments today.
It says, as an Israeli mob set fire
to the perimeter near the gas station,
a tragedy was miraculously averted.
She says, this is not Gaza
where Israel rules lacy away from foreign I This is occupied
Jerusalem where most diplomatic missions and consulates
and UN offices are.
And now they're starting to set fire
to these buildings with people inside.
But Lindsey Graham's not gonna
say anything 'cause they're cowards.
And just a quick overlap as well.
This is what happened to one person from a West Bank
checkpoint
For those in the podcast, which is pretty hard to look at.
The guy lost his eye, it's a big purple eye
and he shows you what happened.
He got hit in the face with a butt of a gun
because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
It, it's nonstop. And Robert can personally
testify to the reality of that.
Now. And lastly, on these last couple points, let's realize
that this is what it looks like to truly use
the buildings they claim Hamas uses, you know,
occupy hospitals and use human shields, right?
He says we have acquired documentation
that actually confirms Israeli military use
of facilities within the Turkish Cancer Hospital
as a military headquarters.
That is another third time we've proven
that they've returned hospitals into headquarters
and all they do is project and project and project.
And they have a sniper position on top obtained
by a soldier account from the uh, uh,
Carmel brigade currently stationed in net Z corridor
and from several days ago.
Now that's the point is there are people in these brigades
that are speaking to the, the media everywhere.
There is division everywhere right now.
They're collapsing guys. It's quite obvious to me.
Now lastly, let's talk about the smart city.
And I think this is really important to end on it for me
to understand what this truly means.
Now, Robin Medi simply shares this image that is from the
Ynet news, Israeli outlet.
Here's what he has to say. Gaza 30 20, 20 35, a new smart,
he says 15 minute city.
That's nowhere in the discussion,
but I argue it's probably
exactly where they're going with this.
But his smart city for sure built on the mass
graves of Palestinian children.
'cause that's the truth. And he already, by the way,
the pier was already using rubble with dead bodies in it.
You literally saw the dump trucks driving by
with dead hands laying out of the rubble that they used
to then build what they're built,
what they're doing on the in the pier and other things.
But it says, new plans in Israeli media reveal
what Israel want to do
with Gaza post genocide and land theft.
The dystopian vision
for the Gaza Strip is being currently approved
by the Netanyahu government.
This is real. Here's why Net news
Gaza 2035 exposure.
This is the utopian vision for the strip, which by the way,
NetNew is Netanyahu's office is examining,
and this is not even a new plan.
The New York Times reported, this was on Friday today,
that senior officials in prime in Ben Netanyahu's office
have been examining in recent months a plan drawn up
by businessmen under which Israel will manage the Gaza Strip
together with other Arab countries for several years.
So this is the game they're playing,
acting like they're gonna allow anything other than their
constant and complete control
over everything that's happening there.
And it says, until control can pass
to Palestinians, that's what they're reporting.
But when you read further down,
it's clear that's never gonna happen.
It says already two months ago they pushed
for the first time Netanyahu's Singapore vision
regarding Gaza.
So it's Netanyahu's vision, interestingly enough.
And now WNET brings the full plan and its sections.
So you can see, look at this overlapping
with the Saudi Arabian concept.
And this is like the vision
of the Gaza Strip in regard to how it's supposed to look.
I mean this is like right outta like the zeitgeist,
things they've shown in the past, like the actual movement.
And it says in the presentation obtained
by WNET under the title from Crisis to Prosperity, a plan
for the transformation of the Gaza Strip from Iranian
aggression to the moderate axis.
I mean it's just stuff full of propaganda.
And the bottom line is this was planned out
long before October 7th.
Pictures are shown that reflect a
utopian vision for the Gaza Strip.
The only thing they need of course is the Palestinians
to get the hell out of the way, right?
It appears to them as a green
and prosperous land with powers and business centers.
Of course, the reality is
that we're talking about illegal Israeli settlers being the
ones that do this, not Palestinians.
Like if they do anything, they'll allow them
to keep a certain area within it,
which they've already talked about the south,
which we'll corral them into despite all of the area.
This, they openly said these things.
It says the goal Gaza prospers is a part
of the Abrahamic Re regional architecture.
The risk Gaza is an Iranian outpost, which is not true.
That disrupts the the moderate regional architects.
Just the point is what they're trying to say is
that we can either bring them into
what we think is this Abrahamic regional architecture like
the Abraham Accords.
It's ridiculous guys. That's about normalization
with Israel, which is about forcing these countries to ca
disregard what their peoples want in
interest, whatever Israel want.
That's the real picture of it.
And all they're saying is, you know,
the Ron bad guy terrors over here
versus what we'll turn them into.
And if they don't, then they kill them all is the reality of
what Israel is putting forward.
The opportunity Gaza prospers in, it says in the past
as a crossroads between two ancient trade routes.
The real, the reality is Gaza was always historically a
central point and they want to turn it back into that again.
And they want you to think that the Palestinians
are somehow holding that up.
That's what they're trying to frame in my opinion.
It says as part of the plan, which was drawn up in November
and presented to its senior members in November,
Israel's supposed to create safe and Hamas free areas.
Well they're telling you they're all Hamas.
So you put that together first in the north,
then later throughout Arab country, Saudi Arabia, UAE,
Egypt, Iran, Jordan,
and Morocco are supposed to supervise the humanitarian aid
that will be provided in the safe areas.
Wait, wait, wait. The safe areas, didn't you just tell us
that we're talking about a new area for everybody,
but now you're talking about specific safe areas.
Well that seems to imply
that you're gonna push all the Palestinians
or the ones you think are dangerous into special camps
and then deliver aid
to them while you're working everything out.
That sounds pretty ominous,
but it says the phase of the program will last 12 months.
Oh good. So just 12 months in a camp. Got it.
12 months in your special safe zone.
I wonder how long that will last once they claim Hamas fired
a rocket or Look, the p Palestinian
Islamic jihad is bad too.
Oh, we gotta stop everything, mark my words.
It says in the next phase, which will last between five
and 10 years after 12 months of special safe camps,
Israel retains overall responsibility for security.
Oh, big surprise.
So just a quick 10 year period
where Israel keeps doing exactly what it's doing.
Everybody okay with that?
Arab countries are creating a multilateral body.
What they're talking about is specifically Arab governments
that have normalized with Israel at the expense
of their countries, not the Arab countries in a whole
that will oversee direct
and finance the Gaza Reconstruction authority.
So now you're talking about no involvement to Palestinians.
So you're talking about other Arab countries
that are acting against their country's interests
for Israel are the ones that are gonna make,
so it's the illusion of some kind
of Arab overlap to making this happen.
Palestinians from Gaza manage the reconstruction authority
they claim, which takes responsibility
for managing the safe area.
So all you're talking about is jamming them in specific
areas and pretending they can control those little small
spots while we dictate everything around you.
I dunno why this should be insulting to everybody.
And it says the Marshall Plan
that's remembered was an American plan
for reconstruction in Europe.
I'll come back to that to comparing it
to something I think we should be concerned about.
It says in the long term, according
to the businessman's plan, Israel will retain the right
to act against security threats.
So bottom line, Israel remains the control of the area.
No matter what narrative you throw over the top of it,
Arab countries will transfer the power in Gaza
to they say a gazen or unified Palestinian government.
So that just means whatever they want it to mean.
So the point is, if it's a unified Palestinian government,
that means if they create something in Palestine,
and name it the Palestinian government, that'll be the one
that gave power to whether
or not it truly has any Palestinians in it.
Okay? I think that's where we're going with this.
The New York Times says, it was stated
that this will be done through a vote
in which the Goins will decide whether they will annex
to the Palestinian authority or not.
Do you realize how ridiculous that is?
Is as Netanyahu
and the rest of them have said, we will never allow them
like they're the ones framing.
And by the way, we're talking about 10 years from the,
from now is when that will happen.
You know, how much in change in 10 years now many people can
be pushed out and arrested and detained and disappeared.
The point is, you'll have a situation where you'll be left
with people willing to do whatever you're told
or people that will keep fighting back
and then that will be an excuse for why it never happens.
This is manufacturing the self.
This is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
It's what they've always done.
Like Za Big new Brezinski was highlighting the plan states
that this phase will take the place on the condition
that the Palestinian authority approves its ability
to carry out deradicalization.
Okay? So you have to deradicalize the
people, which means what?
The people that don't believe that you're,
that means all Palestinians
that if they can prove they've deradicalize their society,
how is this different than the Uyghur conversation in China?
It's not, you're talking about average
Palestinians who you don't like.
They try to frame them as all dangerous.
But while say like claiming you're protecting them from
Hamas, but claiming them all, Hamas, you get the point
of all of this, it's, it's a exercise in futility
and they know what they're doing.
They've done it three or four times already.
Now it says the final phase.
So realize we're 10, 15 years out by now
that Palestinians will manage the Gaza Strip independently.
Now how many want to bet that you'll never get there?
That they'll have 45 arguments that are the why.
They're just too dangerous to allow.
It's the same thing they're saying now.
Oh, and they'll join the Abraham Accords,
which means they'll have to normalize
with Israel, which they'll never do.
So there you go. There's a thousand things
that will show you that they'll never,
it'll just never happen.
And they'll blame them for everything.
The hawkish man of the government apparently
is expected not even to support it.
So it's possible that even that won't even be allowed
to happen because Schmo Rich
and Ben Vere that we're constantly calling out are
screaming to murder all of them.
Anyway, it's just frustrating
that we can't have an honest conversation about
this when it's this obvious.
Now, I guess there was the last couple parts here.
I think the point was, yeah, it says they stated
that Netanyahu refrained from speaking about this publicly.
Now why would that be? If your whole point is about,
it's because this is an agenda.
This is not about the Palestinians at all.
And it's about trying to make sure you have the right moment
and cultivating the perception of it
before you put out the lie.
In my opinion. Now it says the office of the plan emphasize
that through it Israel will be able
to achieve long-term security in the South.
Right? So it's not about Palestinians at all,
it's about Israel trying to achieve what it wants.
How is that not clear? It says the US
for its part will stabilize the Middle East
and achieve dominance in the region.
Oh, good. More power for real us more.
You know, I mean this is just,
this is showing you their real face
alongside the realization
that the Biden administration's vision for a trade corridor
between India and the Middle East.
Right? So it's all about you,
but the Palestinians can be controlled for 15 years
and we'll give them something and we'll call it for them.
We'll say it's about Palestinian self-determination.
It says on the one page of the, uh, let me just,
I think it was the point about the Gaza
2030 vision that's noted.
And it's written that while Iran is spreading radicalism
and instability from the northeast,
the Middle East is turning southwest.
That's not even remotely true.
It's just, it's just so embarrassing.
The narrative they try to set the Middle East is
it's objectively turning against Israel every possible way.
Even the governments like Egypt
and the rest, rest of them are not able
to control the very overwhelmingly obvious anti-Israel
sentiment from their people wildly justified today.
Not Jewish Israeli Zionist,
but it says the utopian vision,
which is also somewhat reminiscent of the dreams
that existed after the disengagement plan and
before the Hamas government was elected.
That's the point. It's the same damn stuff guys.
Oh man, what happened there? Oh, it just forced refresh.
That's what happened. Typical, always changing things.
That's how this works. Lemme get back to it.
We're almost done with this last part and,
and then interestingly enough, here's
what it says, solar fields.
Oh, and it says, alongside the development
of the gas reservoirs, which we all knew was part of this.
So they're literally gonna create the seaport.
Oh, I I, I skipped this part. Hold on.
Yeah, so just right here it says
the masterminds of the plan.
They believe that it'll be possible
to build railroads from the Gaza to the seaport
and airport in nearby ish, alongside the development
of the gas reservoirs, of course, which will do
the revenue will only go to the United States
and Israel at the expense of everybody else.
Of course, just like with all of Africa solar fields
and the SAI will provide energy
for regional dis desalination plans.
The reconstruction of Gaza will require raw materials
and services from the Gulf countries,
which will create demand and opportunity.
So you, you're just, you're just folding in other entities
and the bottom line is, none of this goes
to help the Palestinians.
None of them want this.
They don't want you to build a world
for them that they have to live in.
They wanna build their own world.
They want self-determination. They want their land back.
Guys, it's quite obvious.
This is as a case study, the creators
of the program point out that it will be possible,
for example, to produce electric vehicles
in the Gaza Strip now.
Oh good. We can start pumping out the other things.
We're gonna push to the rest of the world
from a place that doesn't want it.
The manufacturing companies will set up the
factories and infrastructure in the north.
So we're gonna start building our companies there.
Are we still talking about four Palestinians?
Well, it's, let's pretend it's just so gross
and obvious what's happening.
And the bottom line is to talk about the Marshall plan,
the finishing point I should say,
just wanna highlight some in some points.
No, there's obvious overlaps
and P things you could argue ended up in
the positive for certain people.
But I wanna make, I wanna recognize that even in the context
of things like the post-World War II conversation,
US economic interests were clearly part of the focal point.
Some argue the Marshall Plan was motivated
by US economic interests, particularly the desire
to create a market for American goods
and services in the places that they were then manipulating.
This has led some to accuse the US of the plan
to promote its own economic interest at expense
of European nations.
I think it's very obvious,
even if you think this was overall positive for the area.
Now, other point, the CIA has,
they're interestingly received 5% of the funds
that were allocated for the Marshall Plan,
which has raised concerns about the agency's involvement in
the plan and potential misuse of funds.
You know how much that money is.
This is what we, this is what we constantly see.
I'm willing to bet you it's a hell of a lot more than 5%.
And then in general, lack of transparency.
Some critics have argued
that the Marshall Plan lack transparency and accountability.
So we don't even truly know
because there was no oversight
how the funds were actually spent.
We get narratives about how it was spent.
Now how do you think this is gonna be any different?
They're comparing it to the Marshall Plan.
That's a smaller example. But at the end of the day,
we all know where this goes.
And if we actually talk about some honest development,
this would come back to the original 67 conversation.
Or if you want to go back further
and argue that Palestine should get all their land back,
which I honestly don't agree with
because of the other dynamics.
But legally that's correct.
But either way, that would be an honest engagement.
The idea that they can give them the West Bank and Gaza
or give them, you know, the point is truly
give them something they control.
What's their argument? Well, we can't allow them
to do it 'cause they're gonna do it again.
Well, you're talking about Hamas though,
not Palestinians, right?
Oops. You conflate those every time. Palestinians.
We can't let them have their own land
because then we're in danger.
It's not true. But then how does this change?
Well, the obvious reality is, within 15 years,
while they squash everybody there,
turn them into something else
or pretend they're still dangerous.
So let's get on board. The one thing that doesn't change
how Palestinians do not get self-determination.
You know, the really, the only thing they're asking for.
It's not hard to see how this goes guys.
It's quite obvious to me that this is only gonna get worse
until people stand up and speak the,
and just call out the self-evident reality.
Now, even then, we already see
that's not changing until the end.
You know, the true end of this is not changing
because we're allowing it to continue.
But the more we fight, the more we call this out,
the more we're seeing pressure,
the more we're seeing other people recognize that they
are able to call it out.
Or maybe they're seeing it for the first time.
But I can see things shifting.
I've never seen a more clear moment of when
what we're doing is directly affecting the outcome.
And it's time to not let the two party illusions scream you
down from caring about that.
Stand up and fight for it. I love you all as always.
Question everything. Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.