- Every single part of the hospital has been destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been destroyed.
When I spoke to Marwan yesterday,
he told me there were 107 patients sitting in the hospital.
60 medical staff. God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures,
surgeons I know have been executed, um,
in the last 48 hours.
There, um, bodies have been discovered, uh,
in the last 1224 hours with who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back.
Uh, uh, uh, and so there is no doubt at all that,
that multiple healthcare workers have been
executed there in the last few days.
Ex you believe executed by whom?
Doctor by the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons
and medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October the seventh.
Over 450 healthcare workers have been killed.
Friends of mine that I have worked with.
- Do you think that you witnessed war crimes taking place?
- Probably, probably.
The ground assumption is that they are Hamas,
and then if you go this way, you're bound
to kill people that are not
- Now in a rare interview,
one soldier tells us about the reality he says he
witnessed. What
- Kind of stuff would they say?
- There are no uninvolved, only unarmed.
This is something that I'm going to carry
for the rest of my life.
- Welcome to the daily wrap up.
A concise show dedicated to bringing you the most
relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours
Tuesday, May 7th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, I know I said yesterday
that I was probably not gonna be here for the last time,
but I'm not even gonna say it today as much
as I think it might actually be.
The last one we had a couple
of hitches I talked about this morning on a wake up in
regard to a couple of things that went wrong
with some drywall and the timing and,
and all, you know, many different things.
So it's gonna be a little bit longer for the new studio.
I'm planning on giving you guys a nice look at it.
Probably pretty soon, once it's done.
What, you know, this is all possible
because of all of you, so thank you for that.
But in general today, a follow up from yesterday,
a a really important follow up into what,
not just the conversation of the illusion of the ceasefire,
something that we have been talking about endlessly since,
since the very first week.
Even something that now is being discussed by,
I think it's me, Hassan, in the interview with,
um, actually, I forget.
I think it's on CNN and brings up that point that, you know,
like breaking news, that we find out
that they even offered this the first week.
And I was thinking, yeah, all of our audience knew that
because they watched the last American vagabond.
We've been repeatedly saying that from the very first week.
That's true. The deal was there. Netanyahu lied about it.
Their government ignored it.
They told the world that Homa didn't want that,
or they denied it even though
that was on the table from the very beginning.
So we're gonna discuss the deeper parts of the illusion
around the ceasefire itself
and how they're using this as I called it,
the ceasefire long con, in order to accomplish their goals
and make the world think that it's the other
side that's responsible.
This is a classic tactic, and it's been used by Israel
and the United States endlessly throughout the foreign po,
the foreign policy in the Middle East.
We've talked about the same exact dynamic with Yemen
and the Serra movement in Saudi Arabia.
How they would pretend there was a ceasefire,
then Saudi Arabia would verify, break, break this according
to everybody other than the US person involved.
The US like Pompeo would stand up
and say it was the other side's
fault, and it would all go back.
And the point was, in the meantime, uh,
Saudi Arabia would take advantage and they would take in
and take more pro, take more territory.
It happened over and over.
Anybody honest could see what was happening.
And it's the same dy ddy dynamic, excuse me,
happening right now.
And same with the US government.
It's not new to see, and the real crux of the point,
they're just dishonest.
These are dishonest people that do not have any reverence
for all the things that Americans care
or, you know, any honest human being cares about integrity,
honesty, you know, even just the concept
of international law.
It's just, it's shocking to see how clear this is today.
We're also gonna talk about the humanitarian aid a little
bit because all these kind of come together, the, the deal
around the hostages,
but in particular what's going on in Rafa.
And we've been talking about the,
the fear about what would be going on here.
And honestly, I haven't,
I don't even think it's happening in earnest yet,
but the, on the actual invasion, the ongoing bombing of Rafa
that we've been showing you as many honest people have
that's been, that have been going on for a a month now
bombing into the area that they've said safe.
Yeah, not a new story happened in con unis happened
everywhere they've said was safe so far.
But the fact that they've been bombing into the area while
the international entities in the United States
and everybody else acts like they're waiting
for some plan while ignoring
that they're bombing innocent people with nowhere to go.
There's some interesting points around this
that we're gonna highlight today.
I mean, it's interesting to me that we've seen endless,
endless amounts of children and women and, and men included,
but specifically women
and children that we've seen ex bombed and attacked
and starved over and over and over, buried in rubble.
And the argument is, well,
they're Hamas human shields without
any evidence to back that up.
But I've never argued that's impossible.
In fact, I find it likely that
that would happen at some point.
Nonetheless. Isn't it also interesting to stand back
and go, okay, with all of the amount of
innocent people again, let's just say children
or women that we've seen killed that they go,
Hamas is using them as shields.
And that's why we just had to, our hands were tied.
Okay, well then how have we not seen a single example
of a Hamas member that you took down alongside them?
Doesn't that seem like a
pretty powerful point to think about?
Now, you could argue that they just don't have it.
They blew them up, or they know, they didn't decide
to show you any number of things you could assume into
giving them the benefit of the doubt,
which I have no idea why you would,
but really taking the step back and looking at everything
and, and asking yourself how we have yet to see
one provable example of a Hamas member.
They claim they've gotten, that they've killed,
they've arrested, all they do is say, oh,
they dressed in human in in civilian clothes.
We can't tell. So all they're doing then is
admitting that we don't know for sure.
So we're bombing everybody, which is ultimately
what all the evidence shows.
All of the artificial intelligence overlaps from Hab, Sora
to lavender, where they admit this IDF members from the
Hannibal directive, from the people from the October 7th all
the way to today telling you that they continue
to shoot at their own people for, I mean,
every single example, all of the IDF whistleblower
that we just played to open, who spoke
to corporate media in Britain
and said, yeah, we're killing people.
I can see it. It's gonna sit with me forever.
The amount of information that people are ignoring,
and it's an, it's an increasingly small group of people,
is shocking to me.
I honestly, I knew how dishonest these people were.
I knew how sociopathic these people were,
but I'm actually still shocked to see
that they have maintained just blythe disregard
to everything we can prove to this point.
And again, that makes me fall back to how is that possible?
What do they have on these people?
Even though they're willing to lie to no end still,
I would've argued they would've tried to, you know,
their opportunists at the end of the day,
they would've tried to find some other way to not have
to be caught lying so relentlessly.
It's ab it is, it's truly shocking.
But I think it's important because it's waking people up.
It's, it's, that's, this is why they're so desperate
to hide, which we won't get into today.
I was gonna talk about the campus protest a bit.
There's still some important things happening there
that I wanna highlight, but probably tomorrow,
the next day when we get into it, I will be playing
or getting into that more.
But there's a reason that was so aggressively attacked
and all the partisan strings were pulled,
gotta make it look like it's one side or the other.
And right now you've got things in Congress desperately
and clumsily trying to make it about only China,
somehow TikTok.
And that's, can't you prove this?
And just really pushing their narratives.
And, you know, not that I trust either side of the question
and answer, but it's interesting to see
how obvious one part of this is.
And certainly there could be more parts,
but all they can do is point to something else.
It just, we all know why,
and it's very clear what's going on here.
Now, I also wanna point out,
as I've said this recently about social media.
I was posting this show on, on truth social,
and this has happened to me more than once.
And again, I hid it, posted all the information, I have my
hashtags and I go down to post it.
And Gaza had become level Gaza.
I don't, I don't know if this is something I'm bumping or I,
but I'm, it's happened more than once now,
and I'm interested to see how it pushes it,
especially right now of all times.
But that, that becomes the fulfilling point.
I just think that's interesting. Just something to consider.
But we're gonna talk about, to start a couple of, uh,
opening interesting points here.
Oh, actually one I wanted to talk about an update I shared,
but a couple of things that, or a good amount of things.
An opening segment that's sort of like some of the things
outside of the conversation of Rafa
and the ceasefire that build in the same direction about why
we should see what these people truly are.
And I'm talking about all of them around the world
that are in the same interests.
And I'm talking about the United States government,
the Israeli government, and, and plenty of others.
It's funny, right? Even right there, if I were to left
that open, everybody would assume into what I, you know,
you guys that follow us know what we're talking about,
the supernational entities
that are the authoritarian governments, the people out there
that are absolutely doing the bad things while pretending
they're fighting for you and
doing all the good in the world.
But we're also gonna, we're gonna talk about some
overlaps with the United Nations.
Some, a human rights or, uh, watch report
and just, I guess the point they made
to start is really what this opening part is.
Really, it's just about to show you how
undeniably clear it is.
And you don't have to take any one
of these entities at face value.
You just, the combination of your own, what you can see,
what you know with the reports coming from even Israel
or even corporate media
or even the United States in conjunction with all the things
that we know we can prove all the times they've been forced
to admit they were lying.
And so I, you know, again,
very telling why those don't pile up.
Why the, even the corporate media who pretends
to be fighting for truth don't look back
and go timeout 14 times.
Now you've pretended you did this and this didn't happen.
But no, because they are clearly being pressured.
They engage with each one as if we have
to give them the benefit of the doubt.
It's clear if a liar is a liar
and they're caught being a liar,
you should go into that going.
They might be lying and,
and flavor that with the conversation, not assume
that they are, but very clearly recognize how often
to this very moment they're being caught lying,
that they just throw out a new another answer.
And a lot of times, those corporate entities just pick up
that answer and run with it next.
And that one too becomes a lie. But it doesn't change.
But overall, let's get into it for the sake of time,
I wanted to start out with just an a a point to this.
Uh, I, I added an update to this.
I'm not gonna read it just because if you guys wanna read,
I, I've, I've pretty much been clear about
the updates on the show.
I put an update on the Save the Last American Vagabond
Gibson Go Campaign for those
that haven't really been watching the show and
or missed when I've talked about it.
And it really just goes over what we've discussed in, in, in
how we are and,
and, you know, a better place than we
were right when we started this.
But ultimately that there's still a lot kind
of dark looming on the horizon about where this may go.
And overall, in general,
we still definitely need your support in order
to fight off this and whatever else may come
and to continue the operations that we are.
And I think there's still a lot of great writing
and everything that's, that's coming out of this platform.
Even though, honestly, right now, if I was trying to be
as safe as possible and make sure that I,
we would just be focusing on this show.
And it's, I've decided it's monumentally important,
even at my expense to make sure that we continue the writing
of all of them and the article
and, and the interviews and everything.
Taylor and, and Derek and Whitney and Matt
and everybody, you know,
and Robert obviously with what's going on with Israel.
And it's so important to see the work
and the perspective that they have.
And anyway, on, on this note, I just wanted you guys to see
that there's an update and you know,
and it, it's kind of a, a, a, a sentiment from my heart
as well, just to want you guys to know.
I mean, actually I'll just read that last part
'cause most of you have heard the updates.
I just wanted to say that ultimately it, it's my worry
that this whole thing will take the form of attempting
to take possession of TLA or drive it to bankruptcy.
And I said, I said, you know me, it is not in me to give up.
So we persevere, we stay the course
and have fate that these dishonest
people will be held accountable.
As soon as my lawyer advises me
that I can publicly discuss the frivolous lawsuits,
I will be sure to give you guys all the details.
You can count on that. And I want this group to be exposed
as the ambulance chasers.
They clearly are. But I want you to know that no matter
what happens, I will not stop doing everything in my power
to expose the injustices of the world
and do my best to hold those behind them to account.
I just hope that it will forever be behind this logo
right here as we,
you and I listening right now, built this with our blood,
our sweat, our tears, it is our home.
I will not give that up without a fight.
I can promise you that. And I said,
simply see you on the front lines.
So in general, if you'd like
to continue supporting the last American
Vagabond, this is a great place.
I'd like you guys to do it for the
recurring donation concept.
That's what I'm trying to build here.
But elsewhere, we have the donation, the address,
and the, I can't even think of it right now.
Buy me a coffee subscribe star
and all the things in the, this,
the donation portal on the website.
Just a truly heartfelt thank you to all of you out there
that have stuck by this platform
and continue to support what we're doing.
And we're growing every day.
We are growing and we are, I truly
believe we're making a difference, guys,
that you are making a difference.
Now, I'd like to start with a,
a tweet from Matt Niels Nielsen who highlights
what Jeffrey Sacks
or really quote tweets what Jeffrey Sacks,
or rather somebody else was quoting him saying,
and I think this is actually pretty powerful Now, as always,
and you shouldn't mean not to say this, that I, you know,
I like a lot of what he says, but there's plenty of stuff
that he said that I can, makes me suspicious
or that I wonder whether there's more going on there.
But as always, when you highlight a quote
or what people say, it's not an endorsement
of everything they've ever done or that we're being tricked
by what they may be doing, uh,
two party illusion, nonsense, it's always in the way.
But here's what Matt Nielsen says, 1947, that's the year,
the National Security Act.
That's the year when we went secret.
This is ultimately what Jeffrey Sachs was saying too.
And now we cannot hold our government accountable
because everything is confidential.
I mean, the really, the point there, and I'll read
what Jeffrey Sachs is saying, is that this,
I don't know if it was always this way or,
but what, at some point, at the very least, if not always,
they recognize that you were their adversary.
Your government decided at some point that, that i,
I shouldn't say recognizes.
'cause I don't think we feel that way in most cases.
If it was not them doing the things they're doing,
I don't think most Americans would perceive, well,
shouldn't the people that we're, that are supposed
to represent us to be our adversaries,
but everything they've done show it's at least since this
moment in 47, shows you that they see you
as their adversary, or at the very least, potentially.
And that goes back to things longer than the United States.
The idea that power structures very clearly do see the
peoples of their countries as in some ways a threat
because they recognize that
that's the only way they could truly lose their power if we
recognize we no longer want them in power.
And even then, dictatorships,
authoritarianism, it's not easy.
Sometimes they just say no.
And that's why they don't want in the, in the
rules based international order, these entities
that are very clearly authoritarian
and very clearly do not care about the things they're
pushing, do not want the rest of the world who may still buy
that to see them that way.
It's always a game of PSYOPs and perception.
The point though, is that you think about what, like
for instance, saying in multiple documents we've talked
about over the years where your government
and the FBI have highlighted that quote,
believing too much in the constitution
represents a possible threat to them.
There's really no way to make sense of that
as the founding document that they swear an oath to
that somehow you're a threat other than to realize
that they don't re believe in or respect what we do.
They're using these things, you know, like pretending
to be a Republican or pretending to be a Christian
or pretending to be a Democrat, whatever it is, just
to make you think they're on your side when the reality is
the people, whether you disagree politically, are the ones
that are technically on your side.
The government has never been on your side.
And quite frankly, even if you agree
with everything they're doing, they're not on your side.
That's the whole point of this situation, this relationship.
These are people that we put in power
and you know, again, based on
what it should be in the illusion we're sold.
'cause it's not that way anymore. But the argument being
that we put people into power that represent our interests,
and we can take them away from that power.
That's the whole point. That the constitution,
that's the point of, you know, what's the actual phrasing
that basically if they go against their own interest,
that it's the right of the people to alter or abolish it.
That's the reality. Now, we say
that and we're called terrorists.
That's also the point. Now let's just, let's, here's
what Jeffrey Sack said, quote, we are on a path
to World War III right now, which interestingly enough,
whether you agree with that, it seems like that's a pretty,
even myself, I've always been very cautious
about even floating that.
'cause I don't wanna be a fearmonger,
I don't wanna hyperbolically talk,
but I mean, I've never, in this whole work,
I've been doing this for a long time, plenty, a lot longer.
Have I seen a time where I'm like this,
even if it's all hype, it takes one trip, one mistake,
one rogue person in Ukraine
to suddenly create something real.
So it's not hard to see that this is a genuine concern,
but he says, nothing is explained, nothing's told
to us, and we have no choices.
That's the truth of where we are guys.
And we need to recognize that all the partisan screamers
are desperate to get you to think.
If you just check that box coming up, everything's good,
or it's not for four years, and we'll fight to put
that person and nothing changes.
It's the, the illusion of that very battle is
what keeps you thinking that
we're fighting for some next step.
And all it does is go right back into
that same fight back and forth.
Teeter-totter shouldn't be, it doesn't have to be.
He says the CIA comes in, conducts the briefings,
and off we go to military escalation.
The public is profoundly unhappy
and the students are getting beaten up.
Faculty are getting arrested
because they're not support supposed to speak about this.
Now, he is not just talking about Israel, Gaza guys,
he says, then there's this concoction
that this is about antisemitism.
Give me a break now that clearly is,
but actually, quite frankly, there's a lot
of other moving parts long
before October 7th forward
that this was very clearly used to suppress.
He says, and this is the important part,
I'm a Jewish professor at Columbia University,
I actually didn't even put that together,
that he's actually at Columbia.
But it says this is not about antisemitism.
So again, a Jewish professor at Columbia telling you
that's not what's happening,
but let's listen to the Israeli government
and the US government
that have an interest in manipulating you
to thinking that's what's happening.
He says, this is about a slaughter
that is taking place in Gaza right now.
And the American people don't like it
in regard to the protests.
They don't like our complicity in it,
and they are protesting it.
That's what this is about.
I a hundred percent agree with that. Even if you think
they're misled, even if they don't know all the information
around the larger discussions, they recognize a problem by
and large and they want to do something about it.
It's amazing that as partisan media
and partisan pundits that we choose to attack people like
that just
because we think they don't know
what we think they should know as opposed to recognizing
that they stand up for something, at least they stand up
for something, not just pushing politics that used
to drive us back into the hamster wheel
of two party illusionists.
But my God, it's so frustrating to watch
how people get trapped in this ideological,
what's the word somebody used the other day?
Well, I good like an I, they used the, the term, the,
the ideological dialectic in regard
to trapping you into the words that they want us to use.
I'll talk about that in a minute. But just this constant
trap where we fall right back into thinking one more step,
one more vote, one more president, he says,
but we don't behave in any reasonable way right now.
Most I think, or more I think
let's just put it the two party illusion.
In my opinion, the people trapped in it not even
to discuss these things, honestly,
to know the facts he says,
or to have hearings where our executive is called
to account by Congress.
That doesn't even exist anymore.
Congress is fighting itself because the, you're not allowed
to work with the other side, which is a guaranteed way
to make sure nothing moves anywhere other than
what they all want.
Or pro-Israel suppression
of speech, suppression of your rights.
He says this was the one, one of the fundamental rules
that Congress was supposed to play.
You know, that whole lie about checks and balances.
It's laughable to think that this is
how anything works right now.
It doesn't. He says, I know it doesn't.
There is no accountability whatsoever.
He says, he says, there are closed door briefings,
and then if you approach a congressman
or senator, as he says, I often do, they say, well, Jeff,
I'm just not supposed to talk about such matters.
And I'm sure you understand not how that's supposed to work.
In the meantime, we have our NATO allies talking about
moving troops to Ukraine
and Russia entering tactical nuclear drills right now.
This is crazy. And
and to be quite frank about this, whatever side you think is
on the right side of history, you have to at least be able
to understand why Russia would be continually increasing its
stance based on the obvious.
And I mean like more so than most anything threat of
what Ukraine represents, the people that they're funding.
I mean, it, that's one of those shocking
and cons, the just blatant lies that we've talked about.
Where on a dime, the very thing that the entirety
of corporate media was calling a Nazi threat
and a building right wing thing
that Russia's doing in Ukraine all suddenly doesn't exist
because now it's our side.
I just don't think I'd, how average people can't see that.
I think they can. He says, this is
what you read about on the path to World War I
or read about when a few people
decided the fate of the world.
He says, we had a, we had made a claim that
because we are a republic that we're not,
technically we want to be.
We should have been. We might
have been for a period of time.
He says it couldn't happen here. That's the argument.
Well, we're a public, it can't happen here.
But starting, this is his argument in 1947,
it has been happening here repeatedly.
Now that's actually just a statement of fact.
The question is whether you think 1947 was a shifting point
or that was an illusion before that,
or it's up for you to decide.
But it's pretty easy to see that the idea
of the National Security Act was one of the moments
that I argue is when we shifted into the idea
of a centralized power, a federal government, which was
what arguably the agreement that room
with the founding fathers was that that would not be
where we went, even though it's provable
that many of them wanted that.
He says, th that's the year the National Security Act, 1947.
That's the year when we went secret
and now we cannot hold our government accountable
because everything is confidential.
Alright? That's because you're a threat.
They recognize in their eyes that you are a threat
to their power, so they hide from you
and then scream democracy.
Now, right now, and we're gonna get into this in a later
segment, but I just wanted to highlight this in the,
in this kind of broad point, Syrian girls shared this,
and I think this is so interesting, the dystopian movies,
the idea of social engineering and predictive programming.
If you saw the MET Gala, it's actually striking
to me the overlap that she's making here.
She says, we're living in the Hunger Games.
And on the right, if the podcast, you see a, a, a young girl
who is screaming in fear covered in Ash
because they're bombing her, her home in Rafa on the left,
I forget what actresses is, frankly,
I don't care dressed in this Hunger Games esque look.
Now that's, it doesn't, that's just a comparison to,
to put your mind in that point,
but realizing that the hero people
flaunting about over wealth, overwhelmed with riches
and wealth and,
and to extravagantly dressed like, you know,
the point is like when you look at those runway shows
and you wonder like, what, who the hell wears this crap?
It looks ridiculous. It's doesn't even, it's not even,
it's because it's not meant to.
It's, it's about extravagance and it's flaunting.
And the point is that this is happening while they're
allowing this, most people there likely
are ignoring what's going on.
It's kind of shocking. And this is the point.
This is the downfall of our society.
This is where we are going,
and it's the downfall for everybody,
but the people in the controlling faction
of authoritarian governance.
Now, here's a very interesting point
that Glenn Greenwald highlighted about, you know,
Pierce Morgan just really clumsily trying
to always look like he's somehow in the,
you know, it's just funny.
He plays this very interesting role for me right now
where he clearly is either just
so shockingly uninformed about things, which is kind of hard
for me to wrap my mind around, or he's playing this role
like he kind of doesn't see it.
And he is trying to play the middle ground
where he's not really attacking Israel,
he is trying to fight for the Palestinians.
I just don't buy it. It's either he's at uninformed
or it's a, it's a ploy.
That's my personal opinion. But this is a great discussion,
professor John, uh, Heimer explains, as Glenn writes,
that the most basic realities about the fairytale
understanding that Pierce Morgan has if US foreign policy,
and this is what we're always trying to highlight, like
what ba the basic crux of the point is.
He's saying that that's not the reality.
The US government doesn't fight for democracy.
Like, like he's, like, he's speaking to a three-year-old
history proves that, right?
But when you say this in the circles of a politics
and left right paradigm, the right would freak out
and call you an anti-American terrorist
because you highlight the provable reality, right?
I mean, and probably in most cases
the left would too, right now.
But the the point is that we don't live in a situation in a,
in a world where our government is some altruistic
entity fighting for freedom.
It's just provably not the reality.
And yet we still are forced to engage with people
that act like that, like Pierce Morgan.
And here it's so fun to watch this casual just
that's not true, like .
And we all know that somewhere in our hearts we know
because we can prove it.
But also because you can just look around the world
and see the byproducts of
what spreading freedom really looks like.
- Wanna remember that if you look at what's happening in the
conventional war, it looks like Putin's gonna win.
Despite the fact that we've now passed this large scale, uh,
arms package for Ukraine, Putin is likely to win.
- Why is that not a terrible thing for America and the West?
- Because you have to prioritize the threats
that you face in the world.
And the fact of the matter is that
what happens in Ukraine does not matter
that much to the United States.
I know for people like you, this is a life and death matter.
The thought of any country, uh, on the planet
that the West defends, uh, losing is, uh, a major defeat
and has catastrophic consequences.
I mean, you felt this way about us pulling out
of Afghanistan,
but I think
that places like Afghanistan know places like
Ukraine don't matter that
- Much.
Didn actually on that, I didn't really, I, I felt
with Afghanistan, America should have kept a small
military presence there to maintain some kind of order.
And I think I was justified in, in saying
that given what's happened since I thought throwing the the
country back to the Taliban was a
catastrophic error of judgment.
And it wouldn't have happened the way it's happened if
America kept a couple of thousand troops there as,
- Yeah, yeah, let's just continue occupying a foreign
country 'cause we're in charge, right?
I mean, it, that's the kind of imperial mindset.
Like this guy either doesn't recognize how, how
belligerent that is.
Like, like, like, so they're incapable of having something
that doesn't involve violence
unless the US violent force is there
to not let them be violent, even though history
shockingly proves the opposite.
And I didn't mean that they'll end up not being violent.
I mean that the fact that the US presence stops violence.
I mean, how willfully naive can you actually be?
I, this is my point. Does he believe that?
Or is he just playing a role
because it's, it's objectively false?
And on top of that, the idea
that the only reason this country is even in the state it
is, is because of the ongoing multi-generational,
multi-age agenda destabilization of Afghanistan going back
to the funding of the mujahideen, which became, you know,
the, the obvious point from there all the way to Isis,
the reality of what they built allowed.
And quite frankly, I think we can prove today that
that was deliberate, at least was going back to it later.
To use it again, was very clearly deliberate.
Not in the interest of fighting the Soviet Union
or fighting bad guys in Afghanistan or fighting anything.
It's about control
- As it does all around the world in endless basis.
So it seemed to me having done, uh, many, many years
of hard work in Afghanistan as a response
to nine 11. So yeah.
- 'cause that's what happened, right?
Many years of hard work to accomplish nothing
after 20 plus years more.
I mean, even the idea of fighting the Taliban,
this they handed back control to the Taliban.
What hard work are you discussing?
The, the complete outsourcing of everything to us interest
that then took wealth from Afghanistan.
The, as they put it, def freeing the cost of assistance
for stealing minerals from the mountains and the, I mean,
or growing opium
and pretending we were stopping those things.
All the hard work he says they put in, you know, which
by the way, perfectly coincided
with the explosion of the opioid crisis.
These people are shockingly ignorant or lying to you. Then
- Simply just overnight, uh, throw everybody out, uh,
and leave the country to the Taliban,
particularly for women's rights.
Nevermind anything else? .
I thought it was an abrogation of America's duty and the uk
- The duty to continue occupying country for our interest,
or excuse me, interest of democracy,
- Right?
But this is your worldview,
which is the United States has a
responsibility to be everywhere.
Uh, and until
- It wins, they should certainly be
preserving freedom and democracy.
Otherwise, why?
Why self style yourself as leader of the free world.
You are either a leader of the free world
and America still has, I think,
half the world's military, uh, firepower.
Uh, and obviously one of the biggest economies.
You're either are that that entity leader
of the free world, or you are not.
And if you are, then what comes with
that is a responsibility to protect freedom
and democracy. Well, I
- Mean, how you think what he's saying is,
is this not the most childish thing I've ever heard,
or that you might, you've ever heard?
By the way, I don't, this freedom is completely struggling.
Let me know if you guys can even hear me. Of course it is.
But that it's your responsibility.
Who elected you to that position? Why?
Why are you just grabbing that
and saying, we are responsible.
We are the policemen of the world,
even though every president pretends like they're not gonna
do that because it's power, it's control.
And of course, you're not spreading democracy,
this ridiculous claim that without that presence,
somehow the world would fall apart.
The provable reality is that the US presence
that causes the destabilization
for their own interests all around the world,
- When it comes under attack from totality, uh, um,
obviously one of the biggest economies, you either are that
that entity leader of the free world or you are not.
And if you are, then what comes with
that is a responsibility to protect freedom
and democracy when it comes under attack from
totalitarian regimes. I would, okay,
- Is that what you did in Libya or, or Afghanistan or Iraq
or Syria or Venezuela or Bolivia?
No, I'd love to see what Pierce thinks is a good example
of how that worked out.
As I joke, I make all the time, they're batting zero
or they're batting zero, right?
I mean, the idea that you can act like you're spreading
freedom, democracy, but oops, I tripped over my shoelaces
and destroyed the country, but we'll do better next time.
Oh, and we also stole all the resources
and, you know, put people in power that work for us.
I just can't recognize
how anybody could be that willfully naive.
It's, it's steal interest.
- Think. - I think if you look at the history
of American foreign policy, it's very hard to make the case
that our principle goal has to bend to protect,
uh, freedom and democracy.
The United States has a rich history of overthrowing, uh,
democracies around the world,
and we have a rich history of siding with some
of the world's, uh, biggest dictators.
Yep. So this idea that we're out there, uh,
protecting freedom and democracy,
and it's our principle goal, uh, in my opinion,
doesn't mesh with reality. Yeah.
- Or shockingly naive
and willfully ignorant would be the right
way to say that, right?
I mean, I think the only reason this is being said publicly
on this show is because
we're at a different point right now.
Things have shifted, like I keep telling you,
and it's not, it's not just
because of Israel's belligerent genocide,
but that's a huge part of it.
It's the building of these previous narratives, the illusion
around COVID-19 that shook everybody free the lie about East
Palestine, the covering up of all sort of things.
It's woken people up.
And so he, I guess, fills the courage to say that,
or that, you know, I don't know.
But at the end of the day, you know, that's correct,
to act like this is the opposite, is not backed up
by the provable evidence.
The fact that they've worked with
before they became the boogeyman, Osama Bin Laden
or Sah Hussein,
or any number of groups
that they later point to as the bad guy.
Or how about the fact that Israel saying Hamas, Hamas,
when they literally funded Hamas for the very purpose
of keeping them in power,
like they can't pretend those don't exist.
And I, I, I think this is an important thing to recognize
that the truth is there and it's just time for Americans
to recognize that they are not what they pretend
to be certainly can be.
We can, we can make something different.
But right now, that's not what's happening.
That's why they're ignoring the genocide
that everyone in the world can see.
Now, Bridget Gabriel, one
of these just ridiculous people out there
that just say things like this on May 6th while they're,
they're literally murdering children with our tax dollars.
And she, she goes, stand with Israel
or stand with terrorists,
like straight up just tapping into George Bush, right?
Really intelligent. 'cause that's the only two things
that exist in this conversation, right?
And a tiberius, again, completely out, you know,
ratioing her for the most part.
And of course, look, that's the ratio right there.
He says, except everyone, except Israel's a terrorist.
This clown . He says, meanwhile,
Israel gonna be gone, been murdering children faster
than the Holocaust.
Hmm. Maybe these idiots are just on the payroll.
And of course, I then posted, well, maybe I have to refresh
this old gym.
Are you serious? Oh, here's why.
Hold on, how's the wrong one? You know,
everyone I don't like is Hamas,
because that's the sim that's the
reality of what they're doing.
There's no evidence to make the claim
that everybody is a terrorist or you're with Israel.
That's pretty silly, isn't it?
But it doesn't matter as people who want
to believe it will believe it.
Now, uncensored news also pointed a great thing out.
Now, this, this is again, sort of in the larger point of why
we are in a very bad way when it comes to
what our government actually is.
And this doesn't even pertain to Israel.
This is about Julian Assange.
I think it's one of the most obvious things
to recognize right now
because of all the rest of it, that these people are
cowardly, meek, I can't even think
of a word harsh enough to describe the kind of person.
Well, it's the same thing I'm talking about all the time.
A person that will do this will stand there
and preach to you about how good we are
and how all the good we're doing.
And then accept the background is
that they're the ones creating all the bad
that they pretend they're fighting, right?
In this case, we're talking about the lie,
the blatant on the face lie by the State Department.
Put this out on the fourth acting like we're fighting,
or I think it was the fourth whatever day was the,
the press, the press freedom day.
Imagine how stupid that is as they're backing a government
that just removed an entire organization from being able
to broadcast and has murdered hundreds
of journalists on the ground, right?
Or the fact that the US government is actively trying
to arrest, potentially execute,
and have tried already one of the journalists
that is most famous for exposing their crimes of the,
the US government, you know, and they stand up
and they act like we're the good guy fighting for freedom.
This is a good clip to show you the overlap,
which is one something De News does all the time of this,
this cowardly person called Viel
who will pretend all day long just as cowardly as Matt
and, uh, uh, Miller and all the rest of them.
Sure it's their job,
but so too was working for the Nazis,
if you wanna compare it to something that is doing wrong.
Not to say that they're Nazis,
but the point is that just pretending
that I was doing my job, as we all
remember, is not an excuse.
You are part of the genocide by allowing the genocide,
by not just allowing it,
by telling us that it's a good thing.
That what they're doing is defending themselves.
And in regard to Julian Assange, the obvious reality
that Sam Husseini and the rest of them point out is
that this is a person who exposed your murder
with the collateral murder video,
and all you have done is tried
to keep him in prison while you stand up
and pat yourself on the back for fighting
for press freedom from
- War zones to oppressive regimes every day,
journalists put themselves on the front
line in search of the truth.
- Can I ask you whether
or not the State Department regards Julian Assange
as a journalist, uh, who would be, you know, covered
by the ideas and embodied in World Press Freedom Day?
- Uh, the State Department thinks that, uh, Mr.
Assange has been charged
with serious criminal conduct in the United States, uh,
in connection with his alleged role in one
of the largest compromises
of classified information in our nation's.
Hi history. It's through their reporting and courage
- That we become aware of all
that is happening across our planet.
- It, I love how they framed the compromising
of intelligence, that that's, that's the point we're making
with the 1947 Act, right?
That it's a crime now
because you're not allowed to reveal these things.
They don't want you to see it no longer truly matters.
And this is the reality. Whether you're exposing a crime
that's supposed to be the whole thing
about whistleblowers, right?
It's a, you're, if you're exposing a crime,
well, it's a protected act.
Well, I mean, the old, they've just spun nothing
but lies around what they claim Assange was involved with
to try to paint it as something
that it's not the same way they pretend
that all Iran is terrorists or that the Ansara movement
or all a bunch of terrorists fighting for Iran,
or the same, none of that is true.
They just have to paint it in a way that allows them
to break the law,
- Selfless work and its essential work.
- His actions risked, uh, serious harm
to US national security, uh,
to the benefit of our adversaries.
It put named human sources to grave and imminent risk. Nope,
- A hundred percent false.
Maybe that's, that's one of the most important points
that they explicitly and,
and painstakingly outlined
for people in when this was beginning.
That they, as WikiLeaks always has took great lengths
to make sure that they did not do that.
That's why they took time to go through it
and worked with these other groups,
including corporate media, by the way.
They're not in prison, to make sure
that they did not reveal those things.
That's why it is a, a, a group that has to this day, as far
as I could tell, never put
something out that's been proven to be false.
All they can do is go, oh, it just,
it's uncomfortable for the US empire.
So he's, he's in jail
- And risk of serious physical harm, uh,
and arbitrary detention.
So, uh, it does not matter, uh, how we categorize,
uh, uh, any person.
But, uh, this is, we view this as a, as, as,
as something he's been charged
with serious criminal conduct.
- It doesn't matter how we categorize anybody
that's pretty self-serving.
You mean aside from the fact that you use that very thing
to categorize average people as terrorists, entire countries
as terrorist organizations.
Yeah, clearly it matters only not when you want it to.
- Well, but, but, but it does matter, actually.
And that's my question. Do you believe
that he's a journalist or not?
- Matt? Uh, I'm just not gonna offer a,
a prescriptive assessment from here.
Our view on Mr. Assad, our view on Mr.
Assange is that he's been charged
with serious criminal
conduct in the United States. If anyone
- Be charged with anything, I just want to know whether
or not you, the State Department, regardless
of any charges that, uh, he faces, uh, believe
that he's a journalist or he is something else.
- And it's only by knowing
that we can work toward achieving progress.
But again, I'm not here to offer, uh, a specific assessment.
What I will say is that he's been charged with a serious,
uh, crime with serious criminal conduct in the United States
that has, uh, seriously put, uh,
and seriously put in harm's way us national security.
And that continues to be the case. They
- Shine a light on injustice.
They hold leaders accountable.
- They tell the stories needing to be told.
- You refer to, uh,
WikiLeaks allegedly damaging US national security.
People might remember that WikiLeaks came to prominence
because they were released the collateral murder video.
And what that showed was US military mowing down Reuters
reporters, uh, workers in Iraq.
- Today, we honor the journalists
who have risked their lives
and for some lost their lives in the quest for the truth.
- Reuters repeatedly asked the US government
to disclose such information about those killings
and US government repeatedly refused to do so.
Only then did we, did we know what happened, uh,
that the US helicopter gunship mowed down, uh,
these Reuters workers, uh,
through the collateral murder video,
- They shine a light on injustice.
They hold leaders accountable.
- They tell the stories needing to be told.
- Are you saying that disclosure of such criminality
by the US government impinges US national security?
- I was answering a question about Mr. Assange. Yeah.
Uh, I was not, uh, offered an assessment on anything else,
- But you said that he, that Wiki Lakes damaged US national
security, did it do so by, uh, uh,
by exposing us criminality?
- I'm not going to parse or get into specifics.
What I will just reiterate again is that Mr.
Assange has been charged with criminal conduct,
whether you're in the briefing room with us
or reporting from a country far away, thank you
for using your pen
or camera to help us understand all
that's happening in the world.
- The WikiLeaks footage will be one of those iconic
and graphic moments of history,
because it shows the full
brutality of war.
- I believe that if those killings were lawful under the
rules of engagement, then the rules
of engagement are wrong, deeply wrong.
- I just think it's such an important thing
to remember that.
I mean, obviously this is why we had so many attacks around,
you know, the division tactics we always see right?
About the idea that somehow he was working for the ccia A,
which by the way, we've never disputed.
We always consider that's what question everything means,
but it also, it doesn't mean to blindly believe into
what works for a partisan narrative, right?
The point is, quite frankly,
you can clearly see at this point that there's importance
around the things that were shown
and importance about how that case gets handled.
Whether or not you think he works for somebody else,
it's about how it's used.
And the obvious reality is we should be fighting for
that person because of that.
Whatever your feelings are. Now in, in the chat,
somebody was asking me about the false account on Telegram.
We wanted you to mention, we talked about earlier,
I wasn't gonna get into it today,
but just there's yet again, another fake account on Telegram
pretending to be TLA.
I didn't bring it up only because I called them out earlier
and basically seemed to force them when I acknowledged them,
they seemed to scramble away and try to delete the account.
But just on that note, just like with anything else,
make sure you recognize that there are people trying
to pretend to be us for obvious reasons.
But it's important to recognize that our government,
or I think personally,
and I call me a pessimist,
that I think pretty much every government we can point to
with given the right power would become exactly what these,
what the US government is.
I don't believe in the idea of a centralized government.
I never have. I believe in what I mean, there's a lot
of the whole conversation to get into
that We've had in depth many times about
what it would look like in a world without something
that we're dealing with today.
It's complicated. And the answers there are, are many, and
or rather, the questions are many and the answers are few
because of how many people out there are
so desperately trapped in the idea
that we need something like that.
But look for the past shows, I've had entire segments on why
that's the reality or why how we could, like, even going
to the, the, the length, the extreme
as some people would see it, of extreme lengths
or the idea of building an anarchistic society, which again,
even just saying that people act like you're
calling to burn things down.
It's just, it's such a sad misrepresentation of,
as I've put it many times, the one ideology
that has no space for government.
Weird how they'd want you to think it means chaos, right?
That's always important to think about.
But I, I believe that if you wanna understand
what anarchism truly is, as we've said many times, it,
it just, it means no rulers, but not no rules.
There's clearly structure. It's just not centralized.
And that's the main point about it.
But on that, we'll digress
and go back to the opening segment here about these
different realities of all of these governments
and how they're not what they pretend to be,
and yet they prose themselves.
They present themselves as some moral arbiter of the world.
Here is a new post from Human Rights Watch.
This is Omar Shaki, Israel
and Palestine, director for Human Rights Watch.
He says, new H uh, human Rights Watch research shows
that Israel used a US weapon
to strike an emergency center in Lebanon.
Oh, Lebanon. And as I,
and I'll go, I'll read from the actual article.
Turns out it was fired from Guess Where Occupied Golden
Heights, which is exactly why they wanted
that territory as well.
The water and other things they're taking resources wise.
But guess what they did? They killed seven aid workers.
So in case you're wondering about the dynamic here,
about the, just the conversation of aid workers or aid
or humanitarian processes in general.
It's not unique and it's been going on
long before October 7th.
But if you needed something outside of Gaza, recognize
that Israel's doing the same thing over there.
It says, we found no evidence
of a military target making this an unlawful
attack on civilians.
Gasp. I mean, it should be,
except it's been happening every 30 seconds since October's,
I won't mean for 75 years, quite frankly,
but far more since October 7th.
It says, us and others should suspend arms to Israel.
Here's the actual Human Rights Watch article, Israel,
US Arms used in Strike that killed Lebanon aid workers.
It's just so disgusting to me that we can have such
transparent evidence.
And yet it just continues.
And, and all of your, the, the worst parts
of your government out there, including in our case,
our government, are actively speaking up in support
of this regardless of this information.
Why? Because they're defending themselves.
Because terrorism, because you're a racist.
It says in Israeli strike, I mean,
I guess we could just say human
rights watch is Hamas, right?
Because that's the equivalent of their dispute
in Israeli strike on an emergency
and relief century in South Lebanon on March 27th
was an unlawful attack on civilians that failed
to take all necessary precautions.
Human Rights Watch said today,
and this was on the sixth, I believe it is today.
It's the seventh, the strike.
Using a US made joint direct action Munition
or JDA guidance kit
and an Israeli made 500 pound general purpose bomb,
killed seven emergency
and relief volunteers from the town of
Hare five kilometers north
of the Israeli occupied Golden Heights.
The strike after midnight. Oh, you know, I'm sorry.
I guess I mistook that when I read it the first time.
Yeah, my, my mistake, I, I take that back.
I thought they, I, when I first read this before,
because it was something I added toward the le end
of my prepping, I thought that red,
that they fired from there, but I I I take it back,
they were, the area they hit was five kilometers north
of the illegally occupied Golden Heights
that was given to them by Trump.
Which, which is why they called it Trump Heights,
even though he has no legal jurisdiction
to give people's territory away.
But it says the strike after midnight targeted a residential
structure that housed the Emergency
and Relief corps of the Lebanese UR administration,
a non-governmental humanitarian organization
that provides emergency rescue, first aid training
and relief services in Lebanon.
So because it's being done for their adversaries,
terrorists, the lot in the eyes of Israel,
or at least that's what they'll say
somehow connected to Iran.
I'm sure human rights watch found no evidence
of a military target at the site.
Just a week before Israel reportedly submitted,
written assurances to the State Department that us
provided weapons were not being used in
violation of international law.
And remember, even at that time, we proved to you
that their own people were screaming in their ear.
They know, we know they're doing that.
It's a even legal aspect saying people,
us people in the area might be charged
with war crimes if this comes to pass.
And yet they just ignore it. Matt Miller lies about it.
It's not new. If you, if you remember,
this was from Ammos International,
this was from October 20th, talking about just
between the seventh and 12th of October, 2023,
that they had committed provably five clear war crimes
where they targeted civilians,
didn't take precautions to avoid them.
Or I guess that where there, well there's a third one.
Basically failing
to take feasible precautions carrying out indiscriminate
attacks or, or, or directly targeting
civilians and proved it.
And yet this continued
and now human rights watch as well, proving to you
that they are continuing to murder people in Lebanon.
In the same context,
murdering aid workers proving on the ground, not
through secondary information, proving on the ground
with their own research that there was no military target,
all of them were civilians.
And in fact, they were working to do first aid
and deliver humanitarian aid that was needed.
Murdered people like Lindsey Graham and,
and whatever that guy's name.
Is that where, uh, Brian, I forget the guy
that dresses like the wears his IDF uniform to Congress.
'cause that's not weird. And ag alarming at all
will openly tell you that none of this matters
or that they're all lying or it's Iran or it's fake news.
'cause this is Hamas with zero evidence.
These are supposed to be the leaders
of the International Rules based Order.
Freddie Pontone also adds that we,
we just recently highlighted this,
but if you have not read this, I'm not gonna read it again.
It is alarming.
They are openly, as he says,
we're not dealing with the government.
You're dealing with mobsters exactly what Whitney would say.
More, uh, more accurate than you realize.
They're openly threatening individually, people
that work there, the employees of the entire ICC
with sanctions, random employees
and their families and everything else.
As always, Mike Pompeo Bolton, they've done this before.
What they're saying is they're openly threatening if you do
this we'll, come after you signed by Mitch McConnell, signed
by Tom Cotton, signed by pretty much all
of the usual suspects.
Mark Rubio, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz.
And here's what John John points out. Yep.
Israel lobby total between the bottom of them,
almost $7 million.
Mitch McConnell's doing good over here
with $1.995 million in lobbying money
that has no influence over what he does.
Of course not Think about this, guys.
Don't you think giving Ted Cruz 1,000,005
might just have some influence?
And I don't realize, realize we just saw what APAC did.
It's APAC we're talking about when they voted
against their interests.
It's, I, this is an important point I just made.
The way that the lobbying game is supposed to work
or the way they tell us anyway, is of course that
they just aren't giving you money.
'cause they support you. They support what they,
what you believe in and your campaign.
And, you know, next year round, if we decide
that you're not doing what we like, we'll we won't,
you know, we'll go another direction.
Not that they immediately and moment to moment use
and give money or pull it back when you don't do exactly
what you're told or supposed to.
That's what they say. That's not what's happening,
except just now.
Right? In the, like last couple of days, APAC spoke up
and said they pulled the funding of every one
of these congressmen that did not vote
for the emergency for Israel.
Proving to you yet again, that they're using this
as it shouldn't be hard to wrap your mind around,
to influence policy of your country in the interest of the,
of, of a foreign government,
rather a foreign political entity
that's controlling another government.
Now here, in regard to the Mass grave conversation,
a Saul Rad points out, um, this is the one speaking,
Nadia Bil Bossi asking about this.
And I'm still blown away that they, the way they respond
to these things, this is in regard
to the 400 people in mass graves.
And the response that you get from Matt Miller,
- This mass graves,
almost 400 people have been buried in mass graves.
Some of them, according to the latest UN report,
not eyewitnesses on the ground, the UN report
or Palestinian media, that they've been buried alive.
And some were children, some were women.
I know you've been seeing that you are a bit slow
and writing reports and delivering them on time.
But why we been falling about this investigation?
What's holding this investigation?
Because, you know, there's serious concern here.
About 400 people have being rounded and buried
and some have been buried alive.
- So we have made clear that Israel needs to continue
to be transparent, uh, about this issue.
Israel said that, uh, with respect to this issue
of mass graves, there are places where they were operated,
where there were mass graves
where Palestinians have buried their dead, uh, uh, in, in,
you know, altogether probably
because of the extraordinary circumstances, uh, uh,
in which, uh, in which they have been forced to live.
And Israel has come in
and exhumed some bodies to try
to identify whether there were hostages here.
They've gotten intelligence that there were hostages
contained in, in those mass graves. And so,
- Or that's what they told Matt,
which Matt dutifully repeats. They've
- Exhumed them to check that, uh,
and then rebury them after the fact.
We believe they ought to continue to be transparent about
what exactly took place.
And that'll continue to be our position.
- Now, what's interesting as usual is that's the story
that they ended up on.
If you've watched this and you have,
because you're watching our show
and plenty others, I imagine they said about four different
things around this, and I'm talking from high level
government positions from Netanyahu to the general
where they come out, or even someone like Elon Levy who's
not technically one of these positions,
but is still aggressively propagandizing for the topic.
What'd they say? First it wasn't.
Oh, it didn't, it wasn't us. It was Hamas.
They killed 'em all right? Or it turns out that they were
Palestinian bodies that they buried
and has the, the narrative shifted back
and forth until they kind of center around what, you know,
as we keep saying, they threw it all at the wall
and they're like, okay, what, what are you buying that one?
Got it. That's the one that's our story.
And Matt Miller comes out and says it
because he's fighting for the truth.
I mean, Rick, just look at that face right now.
I mean, it's just, it, it's so clear.
It's not even about being clear.
We can prove that they're lying.
And one of the main things that they say here in the tweet,
so Palestinians buried their dead zip tied, of course,
all they're gonna say is, well, Hamas, whoa, whoa.
Okay, so you could prove that. No.
Okay, so you don't know why they were zip tied,
but your assumption is that it must have been Hamas.
That's the game that gets played.
You don't just get to blindly assume into what works for
what you're saying if they're zip tied.
We have to ask whether that's,
and of course we realize that that's
what the Israeli government has been doing on every video
where they arrest, in quotes, Palestinians, what do they do?
Blindfold them, zip ti their hands.
And every time we've seen examples of
where they ended up dead, here is the UN article.
Mass Graves and Gaza show victims hands were
tied, says UN's, right?
Rights office. And yet again, let's not forget
that we have doctors, one of which who by the way,
I guess is right now in Rafa, Nick Maynard who went back
after all that, he went back to Gaza.
Think about the courage that takes,
even though he watched doctors get killed in front of him.
And now he's, you know, who knows what's gonna happen.
Quite frankly, I think that they're, that's the kind
of person that they will go after
because he's been clear about things like this.
- Every single part of the hospital has been destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been destroyed.
When I spoke to Marwan yesterday, he told me there were 107
patients sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures,
surgeons I know have been executed, um,
in the last 48 hours.
There, um, bodies have been discovered, uh, in the last 12
to 24 hours with who have been handcuffed with their arms
behind their back, uh, a, a, a And
so there is no doubt at all that,
that multiple healthcare workers have been executed there
in the last few days.
Ex you believe executed by whom?
Doctor by the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons
and medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October the seventh.
Over 450 healthcare workers have been killed.
Friends of mine that I have worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well,
and nothing has been heard of them since.
So there is no doubt in my mind,
and I've, I I I, I can bear witness from this,
from my time at Axa Hospital
and from talking to people
that there's been direct targeting of the healthcare
system in Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals
and multiple killings of healthcare workers.
Any death is tragic. But this is not,
and I say, again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be upset
by this expression, colo, collateral damage.
This is specifically targeted.
You are saying medical professionals by the IDF
to be taken off and executed as your belief.
Most certainly, that is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that leads you,
would lead you to believe that there had been terrorists
who were hiding in the hospital without exception?
Every single one has responded
to say they have never witnessed any Hamas militant in the
hospitals they have worked in.
- Now that that discussion was
before the mass grave, the bigger point, the, the,
the most recent example that got a lot of attention,
he was saying this before that started to get attention
saying we, and, and understand
when he says, that's my belief.
What he is talking about is why they were doing it.
And that they were doing it to a, to track, you know,
take them off and kill them.
And the point is he's admit, he's seen them shoot them,
seen them take them off.
And again, it was a human, uh, Euro me human rights group
reported that they've proven 141 of those IDF mass grapes,
141 for the podcast.
I'll include the show. We discussed this
with all the source materials,
so you can look at it for yourself.
As usual, this is undeniably obvious.
Now, in general, again, here's another amnesty, uh,
international from uh, November 8th.
We've shown you this as well for,
and this is in both West Bank and in Gaza.
And by the way, in Israeli detention, horrifying cases
of torture and degrading treatment
of Palestinians amid a spike in arbitrary arrests, it's not
that hard to recognize that they're killing these people.
Again, the UN has made these statements, so
to have the human rights groups, doctors that have seen it,
and yet we're all just gonna listen to
what the IDF who's responsible wants you
to believe is happening.
Even though, as I said in the beginning, what,
and again, not even just women and children, just examples
of innocent people, one
after another, human rights groups, United Nations,
even their own allies calling out what's happening
and all they say is human shields, again,
without a single example of a,
and again, the, the, the images of
what they claim are somebody shooting this from the
hospital, which by the way ended up later being debunked
is not even what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about a provable example
of in real time, somebody who gets killed.
Oh, here they are. You know, we, we trap the guy
or we killed him, and here's his body
of a Hamas member alongside all the civilians they kill.
All we get is all the civilians.
And they go, well, human shields, well,
where are the Hama members then?
We're just supposed to take that on credit.
You're supposed to go, okay, then
you must be knowing what's going.
I just can't wrap my mind about how anybody can do that.
Here is another UN article.
This is from May 6th, onslaught of Violence Against Women
and Children in Gaza.
Unacceptable, which I guarantee is making the Zionist seed
with anger because all they want them
to do is report the lies they've been spinning about what's
happening to people on October 7th
and nothing else, even though they keep
getting caught lying about it.
You can prove this with a, an endless string
of provable information, provable witnesses,
provable testimony, historical documentation
that this is what they've been doing.
Not that every Jew or every Israeli supports it,
but clearly that it's been happening
and that they do have mass support,
not just from their own country, which is pretty disgusting.
Now, one other point I wanna make for this opening segment
is, is the, the very important discussion needs to be had.
And now look, I definitely could be wrong.
I do not think I am, and I'll show you that.
I think this point proves that even if it's a, even if the,
the ratio I could be wrong about, which is the point that
it's obvious to me as I think it should be to anybody,
that there is a lot of Jewish people, even just Israelis
that aren't Jewish, that do not believe JZ
Zionism is Judaism.
Do not believe the state of Israel represents every Israeli
or every Jew, or specifically every Jew in that context,
because technically Israel
would be the representative of Israel.
That's the government, that's how it should be.
America represents Americans, not all Christians.
But the point is that I think it's very clear
that at the very least, a lot, which you know,
could be a few percentile if you think,
but that's still a hell of a lot of people
do not think that.
So my point is that you can't say
that they are the same thing
or that everybody, every Jew, it's broad stroking.
It's ignorance. We should not do that.
I'll come back to this video in a minute about them praying
before they enter Rafa
and what they say, which is ultimately
that they wanna destroy Rafa.
But Gild points out, he says, for those good people
who tell us that Ju z Judaism is not Zionism,
you look at this and please try to point out
where exactly Zionism ends in Judaism starts.
No, I'm not even saying he's wrong
to point that, to have that opinion.
I could very well be wrong,
but I find it really hard to believe
that we can't or that he cannot.
We can't, that just don't recognize the groups
that are protesting this who are Jewish.
Doesn't that then make the point that it's not everybody
or this idea that we're looking at a video full
of IDF members who are just because they're there
and they're praying this somehow means
that they are all Jewish, they're all Zionists.
We don't know what they believe.
They're standing there being, they're doing
this with bottom line.
I said, I don't get why this is so difficult for some,
there are Jewish people, Jewish groups, many in fact
who do not support Zionism.
Now many does not mean the majority,
but there's a lot of people and it's clear there's huge
groups, multinational.
I said, there's your answer. It may be the vast majority
who do, but an honest person cannot claim they're the same
if we accept the obvious reality of my point.
And this person says there are a small amount of quote,
good Jews, he says, who are condemning Zionism?
The majority of Jews globally are overwhelmingly in support
of the illegal racist apartheid
and brutal squatter colony of Palestinian land.
And I said, even if that is true,
and I disagree, it still makes my point.
It makes the point that overall
what we're talking about is some that do not.
So again, you just can't make this broad stroking point.
I mean, you can but realize that you're wrong
because not every Jew in the world feels that way.
Now, and I the other point to make here,
and again, I looked, I you could argue
these people have good intentions.
They just are, they're, maybe they're right, I'm wrong,
but in my opinion that they're wrong in the, the overview of
how many people and the idea that they're highlighting
specific religion as the problem.
Like that is always a problem for me.
But my point is
that we've already been warned about this by people.
I forget exactly who that was.
I believe it was somebody prominent the Israeli society.
The point was they're basically saying
that they see this creeping narrative now
where you're gonna start to see, that's in the interest
of Zionism, to create the illusion of antisemitism.
People like I would argue like a Jackson Hinkle out there
or somebody like that, whether they know it
or not, who are gonna suddenly start shifting into going,
you know what, we just gotta say the Jews,
that it's the Jew, and turn it into that alone.
Because then that becomes, aha, we knew it.
That's what everyone, and and even if you think that
recognize how you're being played into making this an all
encompassing one.
Everybody who is Jewish therefore is bad.
Now, I don't think anybody, even people that believe
what they're saying here can argue that.
And be honest, if you could admit as they just did
that there is some that don't.
Now I, maybe I'm beating a dead horse,
but I think it's important that we recognize
that distinction because there is
coming and it's already happening.
A ploy that's gonna try to drive us into dividing even
amongst the group of people like this that recognize
that Zionism or if they,
maybe they think it's all the point, is
that we can see a problem of people that are doing
what they're doing in Gaza
and the ideology they're pushing around the world.
It's important. And I think the, the, the major point
as Alan Mizrahi points out is that this is going to be used
to divide the people that truly see the problem.
And he says, I'm deeply, deeply shamed
and angry that for many, now this is an Israeli Jew who,
who lives in Israel who's calling this out.
He says, these people are, oh, he says that
I'm deeply shamed and angry that for many, many people,
these faces of laughing Jewish kids at an at at a woman
who was just displaced from her home will come
to represent Jews.
These people are not only evil, he says they are idiots,
lacking any sense of historical awareness.
He says they don't have the slightest idea.
People will remember this long
after there is no more USA Israel or European Union.
Now I actually think this is an old image.
I could be wrong, but it's kind of irrelevant to the point.
Simon Godick just points out settlers making fun
of Palestinian woman after the occupation,
authorities forced her out of her home in Sheikh
Sharah neighborhood in Jerusalem.
Which side are you on?
Now that's, again, you could take that as Muslim versus you,
but I think it's the point that's is obviously
about right and wrong.
The fact that you have an a, a group that is
laughing at the suffering of another person
simply because of who they are.
That's hatred, that's bigotry, that's racism.
But again, I think this is important.
And Torah, Jews, as I usually talk about the Torah
Judaism group, which is a different group.
It says Israel's yam has solemn celebration
is another act of fabrication.
And this, this is a a, a Judaism group, you know,
more multinational.
It says, Israel's leaders exploited the suffering
of European Jewry to advance their post-war sainthood goals.
And we've talked about this. The CIA's documentation
highlights that they were willing to sacrifice Arab Jews
to accomplish what they wanted.
Grab that real quick just in case people
'cause that, you know, these kind of claims are the things
that typically people would completely disregard without
even looking to find out if it's true
until you shove it in their face and show them.
And they still probably will ignore it.
But the documents very clearly right here,
and you can hopefully watch the show
'cause I go into it in depth where they highlight this fact.
It's a cia.gov document
where they literally highlight the fact
that the Jewish agency is apparently willing
to sacrifice Jews residing in Arab countries.
And it's for their own interests. That's Zionism.
But he says they did little to rescue our
brethren trapped in the Holocaust furnace.
And of course, Dan Coen highlights the fact
that their own rat's article
and historical reality is that the Zionist entities,
Lehigh party in particular was working
and did align themselves
with Nazi Germany will pass the final solution.
It's the same thing with Rwanda
and plenty of other genocides
where they were involved from
the beginning, the middle, and the end.
And we just ignore that because politics, it
says like today they view the innocent lives taken
during war as a price to pay for Zionism.
This is why we highlight the fact
that Jews in general are being used by Zionism.
And many of them are beginning to realize that the politic,
the politicizing antisemitism is another avenue explored
by Zionists to ensure Jews remain in a perpetual state
of fear, all to indoctrinate us
that Jews need the Zionists to save us.
So let's stop and read the words of our alleged saviors
and what they did not do to alleviate the crushing sa uh,
suffering of our parents during the Holocaust.
Now you can read this for yourself,
but they, they're getting into the, and this I just in time,
I'll probably come back to that actually,
but it's discussing what they were.
It's all on the record guys, what Zionists truly believed,
the fact that Herzl himself was an atheist, the reality
that they openly, they were enthusiastic about their,
their settler colonialism.
It's obvious include this for you
to read or watch.
Now finally, Zachary Foster, who's also Jewish,
who is a historian
of Palestinian history from Princeton, has a PhD.
He says, meta employees have published a petition in which
they indicate a proposed policy at meta
to treat the word Zionist as a proxy for Jewish.
It's not, other than I think people
that are trying to conflate that.
And I see that as a growing
problem 'cause they're not the same thing.
Even if you think most Jews believe in Zionism, it says,
Hey meta, he writes the overwhelming
and this is his claim, which I find interesting.
The overwhelming majority of Zionists are non-Jewish.
He says, tens of millions
of American evangelicals are Zionists.
You're going to falsely label them all Jews
while many hundreds of thousands, millions
of Jews do not identify a Zionist.
He said, and this is a guy who has a PhD in this history.
He says that's because the two ideologies
have nothing to do with each other.
Judaism is a 3000 plus year old anti-fragile religion.
Zionism is 140 year old.
Extremely fragile political ideology.
If you treat one as a proxy for the other,
you falsely are labeling millions
of people something they are not.
But that's the point. It's about creating the divide.
It's about creating the justification
to suppress speech, everything we've talked about.
So I just don't know how you could factor
that information in with the idea that one equals the other.
And what's also interesting is that people over here,
which you know, potentially are doing so
with good intentions, are trying to highlight that there is,
that they are the same thing
and they're pointing out that Israel's a problem.
It's weird that they're saying the same thing.
Israel is, who is telling you that they are the same thing.
Does that seem like an interesting overlap?
If they seem like they're at odds, maybe they're not.
I mean we have to consider these points now getting into
first the humanitarian aid, the famine, the lies
around this, which then kind of dovetails with the idea
as usual of the hostages and the ceasefire.
And then which goes into the reality
of what's happening in Rafa.
So first, this is an article from NPR just showing you
corporate media on May 4th saying senior un official says
Northern Gaza is now not will be,
is now in full blown famine.
We shouldn't need them to say that.
Seeing as how the groups that are charged with
identifying the different levels of starvation, both
of them have labeled this a five out of five, right?
So there's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 5 the highest level
of absolute famine.
And that's where they've said this
is, we know this is happening.
All you get is people like Elon Levy who want
to yell you down from acknowledging
that they're starving children for fun
or for whatever agenda they're trying to accomplish.
But well, but while dancing
and having parties, you know, just in case
we don't understand what that means.
Now, here is Philip Lazar from from RA saying,
and this is, this is posted on the fifth, like
how long this has been going on, this lie back and forth.
Same thing with the dumb ceasefire conversation.
The lie, the blatant misrepresentation
about the obvious dynamic.
The fact that they knew that they offered them something
that they didn't expect them to take and they did
and they acted like that's you're lying
and just backed away and bombed Rafa.
Like it's just so clumsy and childish
and they know we can see it.
And yet they trot Matt Millard
to say they didn't even accept it
Hamas, even though they did.
And it's easy to prove. But
before we get to that, he says the Israeli authorities
continue to deny humanitarian access to the,
to the United Nations, you know, and then they turn around
and say they're not letting enough
in, we're putting it in front of them.
And they're not doing anything with it except when they try
to, they won't let them or they shoot them
because they claim they're Hamas.
It's very easy to see how this contradiction works.
He says just this week they have denied for the second time,
specifically Philip Lazaris,
who was the commissioner general of ra, he says his entry
to Gaza where he had planned to be with their RA teams,
including those on the front lines.
Again, think of the courage that takes
where he knows they're shooting them
the past while re recorded an increase in the denial
of humanitarian access and attacks on humanitarian workers
and convoys, right?
So they've seen the past while like,
so in the recent history, the last couple of weeks
or months, they have seen an increase in denial while being
called out for not doing it
and claiming they're increasing it.
They've actually increased their denial.
And it's overlaps exactly with Rafa
because I'm gonna show you in a minute
that they're not just blocking their way out,
but now blocking the access of any food that at all
that could come in and beginning the operation.
How do you not see that as a guaranteed way
to take as many out as they can?
Even though there are people that are fleeing into Alse in
different areas, they've been bombing Al Wase
and other places this whole time.
That's the safe area. Like the
rest of them were always gonna be.
And they bomb those two. This says only in the past two
weeks, Lazar continues.
We have recorded 10 incidents involving shooting at convoys
10 arrest of UN staff, including bullying,
stripping them naked threats with arms
and long delays at checkpoints forcing convoys to move
during the dark world war.
That would be probably the even the focus
of everything I talked about.
If it wasn't for all the other things going on,
I didn't even know that until he reported it.
And the problem is that we, and it's not a problem.
I mean it is, all of this is problems.
All of them have problems. But the campus protest
and you know, it's just crazy how much very real suffering
and death is happening, but almost in
as a distraction from something else.
You know, it could be. The bottom line is
shootings at these convoys in the previous examples were
huge stories arresting UN staff, stripping them naked.
I mean, how is that not a gigantic story?
It's only because these pretend that you know,
fake defenders of liberty, including the US government,
act like they're fighting for freedom
and defending the right, you
know, school, everything they claim.
Well willfully ignoring that,
willfully ignoring the attacking and murdering
and suppression of Americans, Palestinian or otherwise.
Journalists like s Abbu Clay,
who they watched murder, didn't care.
This is what they think of you.
They're allowing this, just like with the US is liberty.
The reality of what they actually care
about is not hard to see.
It says these incidents happen repeatedly.
It says at the time we are engaged in a race against the
clock to overt famine.
That's exactly the point. It's about an illusion
to maintain the famine.
It is also he says it also creates fear among courageous
and committed humanitarian teams.
'cause they know they're gonna get shot at
since the beginning of the war.
He says the un, including Unre
and other humanitarian personnel premises
and operations have been blatantly disregarded today.
Palestine armed groups launched rockets at Kareem Shalom
crossing causing its closure.
He thought, and this isn't, we'll get to that in a minute.
Now this is what's being reported regarding whether
or not it was that that caused that
or that it was, we will get into in a minute.
But the point is, it's obvious what they're doing
and it's obvious that they're bombing as will prove
to you in a minute, military installations
that are being put up in order
to do what they're doing in Rafa.
It says it is used for humanitarian deliveries.
He says, I demand an independent investigation
and accountability for the blatant disregard
of human humanitarian workers, operations and facilities.
All protected international law to do
otherwise would set a dangerous precedent
and com compromise humanitarian work around the world.
He says, I call on Israeli authorities
to facilitate humanitarian access across the Gaza Strip,
including the north, but they don't care.
They've been saying this for months
and they pretend that they are and they're lying about it.
He says, I also call on Hamas
and other groups to stop any attacks on humanitarian
crossings, refrain from aid division aversion,
and make sure assistance reaches all those in need.
Denial of humanitarian access is a
violation of humanitarian law.
So the two parts here is one that is very clear, nonstop,
right to this moment, Israel is absolutely stopping,
hindering, suppressing any aid while pretending they're
increasing it, actually increasing the denial.
But he points out there was shereem the crossing we were
gonna discuss yesterday.
And it's important to understand
what actually is going on in regard to where they bombed
and what they were aiming at.
But nonetheless it did result in Israel
closing down the crossing.
So it's the same point.
He's just simply saying that we should stop this
to make sure aid gets
through 'cause that's his only concern.
But it's important to understand who closed the crossing
and why it happened.
The first part that they used, I argue intentionally to do
what they wanted already, which was to stop more aid.
Now here it was Brian Mass who I was trying
to remember earlier, just quickly on un Ra, this is the kind
of shameless lie that we keep seeing.
He says, Joe Biden handed over one O over more than
$121 million to ra.
You know, the United Nations humanitarian group has been
doing good work for Palestinians for decades
and maintaining the right of return record
that people like Brian Mass are desperate to hide from you.
He says, even when it was clear
the agency's employees took part in October 7th attacks.
That's what he just said. You know,
and you don't, you know the reality, right?
The fact that every group, even the United Nations
or other, even the United States,
in many sense cases have acknowledged this Canada Israel yet
to show evidence,
unstaffed are members of the terrorist group.
This was April 22nd, 2024. Nothing new has changed.
Now here is the guardian.
Israel still has no proof unre terrorist claims,
but damage to Al agency is done.
This is uh, uh, April, 2024.
And what they're saying is, the damage was done to the group
despite evidence because propaganda, right?
This was NPRI believe, report on Unre concludes.
Israel has not
provided evidence of employee's militancy and other guardian.
Israel has yet to provide evidence of unstaffed claims.
I mean, it's on and on and on.
And now you could argue that maybe it's still true.
My point is a person in power in Congress knowingly lying
because that's what he wants to side with probably
because he's literally in their military.
He says, my new bipartisan bill would force the State
Department to do everything it can to recoup this money.
So during open starvation tactics
and obvious genocide, you want
to yank back money from the group that's trying
to feed these people, you know, for freedom and democracy.
Obviously that's not what he's doing.
These people are maniacs.
I said, you are a clown, a shamelessly lying clown.
He doesn't care. He literally doesn't care.
Now, Francesca Albany from the United Nations,
who he would blithely call a Hamas member
because he's that ignorant, says what I've seen,
rejected in quotes by Israel
and stored in warehouses in Northern, she sai,
is not just critical support for survival of Gaza.
It is that, but it's the solidarity of so many people
around the world, as you can see in the pictures from
Brazil, from France, from Kuwait, from Singapore.
But they just sit there and rot because Hamas, no,
because Israel has yet to even begin to, I mean,
not only does it just sit there,
but the process gets delayed by those restrictions,
by the fact that they hold it up for days.
Imagine waiting in these lines for multiple days
and they're getting turned back
because you have a blanket or a gauze.
All things that have been turned down for God knows why.
Obviously because they're trying to hurt these people.
And I showed you a couple of these Y just yesterday,
but you know, ham, Mohammad Safa pointing out
what these people are dealing with.
I mean, you just can't deny
what you're looking at, guys, that's not fake news.
It's easy to prove 245 calories.
Children in Gaza have only 245 calories a day.
Now Ahad si uh, si uh, si
pointed this out yesterday, urgent.
He says, I can confirm that British aid workers are being
bombed at the RFA border.
Now see, just like with Lebanon,
just like the World Central Kitchen,
just like the Flower massacre, it's not hard
to recognize consistency here, guys.
They're bombing aid workers.
And Israel and Egypt are refusing to open the border
to allow them to leave the British government.
And the others he mentions here are
responsible for their safety.
They must secure their evacuation immediately.
But we know what's happening, they don't care.
Now, he added to that today, he said, I can now reveal
that it was in fact actually Oxford Professor Nick, Nick,
Nick Maynard, who we just talked about,
who was stuck in the midst of the bombing.
So right there, guys, he, for all we know,
they were trying to kill this person.
Either way, we're talking about an A doctor internationally
there to work for anybody that's in s in need.
And he almost got murdered by bombing.
Is that pinpoint targeting only Hamas? Clearly not.
He is now safe, safe in Cairo.
Thank God he spoke to BBC radio.
And you can just do it right here.
It's really just kind of overview, but you can listen to it.
It's important to hear what's going on.
Think about how wild that is.
Now let's get into some of the lies coming from the same old
liars Koga.
You know, a group that's literally in their byline says con
coordinating, facilitating humanitarian aid.
As they routinely lie about doing that, they say,
here's the funniest, the most disgusting macab part about it
so far, 68 trucks were transferred today.
Oh yeah, 60 outta 500
that you never meet anymore is the obvious lie
that you pretend you're doing good.
Just because, I mean, look, I'm not even sure
that any made it through, quite frankly,
but let's pretend like they are, which kind of, I kind
of believe that's happening for the very illusion they're
working, doing good.
Like when they give bottles to people and then shoot them
after the camera stops, or help an old man
across the street and then shoot 'em in the back.
Which all these have been proven
even by human rights groups.
These are terrible people we're talking about willfully
trying to pretend to be good.
And then so in with such hatred, murdering that same person,
the point is that 68 trucks is 500 a day
before October 7th was not meeting their needs.
And that's just humanitarian aid in general.
They're not even remotely meeting the needs.
And the point is, as many have highlighted that,
let's just say you were doing 500 a day right now,
which even then was not meeting their needs.
They were food insecure before October 7th.
The point would be that they in starvation is famine
in absolute famine.
They need not just food, they need support,
they need medical treatment,
but on top of that, they need a hell of a lot more food.
But it's not being done.
They're, they're systematically driving them into
starvation and already there.
Alistair Al says, update. First of all, this is the point.
It says action aid. This is today says,
or rather, I think it was or late last night, it was, no,
it was early, early this morning.
They write action aid
says no aid zero is getting into Gaza.
Why? Because all the crossings are closed.
You know, a group that is highlighting these things
and focusing on 'em, right?
But then the writer from Sky News of course, goes,
update goes IDF and Koga said, that's not true.
End of story .
Like, it's just, so there's what we did.
We get people on the ground investigation,
human rights groups, United Nations, average Palestinian,
everybody like, it's not happening.
They're closed. They're not even letting it in.
And they just go, thus, yes, we are report that
and Sky News does what they're told.
That's pretty stupid, isn't it?
And that's what then AK goes so far, 68 trucks.
'cause we say so, well first of all, again, this is,
this is all the way up until day two.
This is from May 6th. Remember
that even the United Nations makes it clear
that the pre-crisis average
of humanitarian aid in general was 500 trucks every day.
Again, including fuel, uh, all in sale, said
and done humanitarian aid here.
All said and done. Humanitarian aid is
what they've been bringing in the entire time.
You know, made sure they started off with about two,
three weeks of hardcore zero aid,
making sure they really kicked off that starvation tactic,
you know, and then just barely trickled it in.
Ma you know, about a fifth of what they might need to kind
of average all the way until maybe even April.
Look at what you're staring at, guys.
The blue numbers here for the,
for the aren't in the podcast.
You can see that's the daily average, okay?
At most, you get to about 1 73 all the way
until April.
That's an average per day.
Where before it was 500
and they were not meeting their needs.
I've made this point many times,
but this is how easy it is to prove that they're lying.
And here's the point is they pretend on one side of it,
which Elon does every day,
we're letting in more than they could possibly need.
Except then when it really gets exposed,
they go, no, no, no, it's not.
But it's Hamas' fault. They're stopping it.
Or alternatively, un r just hasn't been picking it up.
You'll see those oscillating excuses all in the same day.
That's how ridiculous this is. But this is provable.
Now, here is a big jump in May,
and this is, this is daily total,
but let's realize 3 40, 3 40 is still
shockingly less than 500, which
before was still food insecure and now they're in famine.
So three 40 is an insult, two 90 is an insult.
All of these are insults. This is may, this is an illusion
as even they said the bare minimum necessary.
But even then they're not doing that.
The bare minimum necessary would at least be 500.
It's not, this is from May 6th.
So here they are saying, by the way, 68 trucks so far
on the seventh and we can't see the seventh, right?
But my point is, you can go back
and look at the excuses they were making before.
As Elon Levy said, 500,
no single point ever have they crossed 500.
Elon Levy more than once has made those claims.
So they're lying. I'm willing to bet you,
even if you go back and look at this claim from Colap
by tomorrow, it probably won't even be remotely true.
Like all said and done, what they claim throughout the day,
how many times we proven this.
Now here was is is the interesting overlap, right?
So this one says,
so far 68 trucks have gone through the crossing.
So they're saying, no, no, it's open.
And they're saying, and this is them saying, no,
he told me it's open right here.
Here's Elon Levy saying the intensified attack on Rafa
didn't lead to the closure of the Kareem crossing
through which more food is entering than before the war.
That's a lie. A hundred percent provable.
We literally just showed you there's not a single moment
this entire time where they have brought
in more than before the war.
He just makes up these fake numbers
and highlights some fake graphs,
which we can pre, you don't need anything else.
This is the overview right
there directly from the United Nations.
He pretends he's signing the
United Nations and says something else.
You can work that out for yourself.
But he says, the fact that Hamas keeps stealing it
or shelling it, they killed four of our soldiers.
Okay? So what's the real narrative here, right?
Or oops, I went the back, the wrong one, right?
Are we talking about the idea that they're being
attacked by Hamas and that's why they can't get it through?
Or are you delivering it to the front and it's sitting there
because the UN doesn't do its job?
Or are you li is just enough going through in general
and they're all lying about it?
All three of those have been stated.
My point is the open
and ongoing constant contradictions
when you can readily prove
that this is not true across the board, on top of the fact
that kga, as I've shown you many times,
has already been caught lying about this exact concept.
And by the way, remember I showed you this last time.
For those that have watched long enough will remember now
they've even taken away that little one thing that it, it's,
you know, alert with a little orange thing on it, which
by the way is very different than the same person over here
sharing the same video that says, oh, fake news.
The reality is the bakery in the video was bombed
and destroyed back in October,
and he is posting this, well,
he's claiming it's from February,
posting this in February 10th, and it's from Koga.
Look at that. And that's the same, that's the point guys.
Koga is lying.
They're posting this claiming 20 bakeries operational,
and they're saying, this came from Nora at a time when we
can prove that it's gone.
Look, I mean, I don't know why we need anything else.
This is a group pretending to fight for humanitarian aid
that is willfully lying
to you about humanitarian aid every single day.
That's just the, the example I've used
because it's so easy to recognize.
Now also recognize that there are currently Israelis
who are standing in front of the eight convoys
that Elon says are coming through without a problem
throwing eight off the trucks into the
ground and destroying them.
That's what's happening. I don't know how we pretend
that's not part of the conversation.
You have to realize this is
absolutely being allowed if not facilitated by the,
by the Israeli government,
because they can't get to these places without, I mean,
this should be the bottom line is in some cases they're in
places where they have to be let in.
But overall, this should be controlled and protected, right?
That if, if you're pretending that the group
that you call Hamas is supposed
to be there protecting this in an area which you control,
how do you explain that one side or the other?
That doesn't make sense. The point is, you know,
Israel's supposed to be protecting these.
It's in their crossing. They're not.
They're letting random settlers come in
and destroy the trucks while pretending like
everything's happening the way it should.
It's just this kind of willful disregard.
The obvious reality is slapping us in the face.
Now here, the height
of insanity says this is the same discussion whilst they're
doing, they're doing this blocking the trucks,
while celebrating the airstrikes on Rafa, literally dancing
and singing in front of blocking the aid
while children are starving to death.
That's what's happening. Now, to get into the overlap
of the Kareem Shalom crossing Koga 13 hours ago,
said earlier today, and this is for the second time
as they're claiming anyway, the main humanitarian aid
crossing into Gaza, Humana, the Kareem, the Kareem Shalom,
even though already proving that they are not doing
what they're supposed to, this is just an excuse in my
opinion, to shut it down because they didn't even bomb the
location where this is talking about.
It says this is the second time this week
that they've actively shot at the extreme.
Uh, Kareem Shalom, Hamas will do anything to prevent aid.
This is, this is the game they're playing despite the fact
that they're lying about doing that.
And Hamas in no way has been shown in any
way to be suppressing the aid.
Not that I can see the videos I've seen in the past
where they show them grabbing trucks can't, you could argue
that that's them simply doing the what to deliver that.
Or my point is, you can't prove
that anything's happening the way they say it's,
I have no reason to doubt
that Hamas in any circumstance would do any
of the things they're claiming because obviously we have
to remember that Israel funds them to be a have in the past.
And I argue in the leadership due to this day.
So that has to be flavored. It's not one thing or the other.
It's kind of a multifaceted problem.
But the point is
that just like the human shields, where's the evidence?
And again, when that oscillates between
Unres not doing its job by delivering it
or that they're destroying it
or you know, all these narratives at the same time,
clearly one of them is a lie.
But here's the point. He says it's almost like Hama is
trying to stop humanitarian aid from getting into Gaza
because it wants a humanitarian crisis.
That woman, yeah, real, real pithy answer.
It's just, it's silly to make the argument
that you can't prove when we can prove
that you are lying about that
or lying about your aid coming in the way it should.
And every other group in the world is also calling that out.
Emmanuel Wright, the IDF announces the
death of a fourth soldier.
This was yesterday in claimed rocket attack against the
staging area near Kareem Shalom.
So here's what's hilarious to me.
He is claiming this like he,
or like using this and, and making a point.
He said, it makes my blood boil.
Despite Hamas attacking Kareem Shalom on October 7th,
Israel has scaled up operations to let far more Aiden.
No, you're a liar. We just proved that.
He says then before the war just can't stop making that lie.
And Mar but don't forget, by the way,
that's exactly the lie that got him fired.
'cause he bumped up against David Cameron
and made him look stupid and they fired he on for it.
Imagine being fired by these early
government for lying .
Think about how silly that is.
He says, how does Hamas respond
by shooting rockets that they hate crossing?
Hey God, it's cra did you even read it?
They report, by the way, who is a military correspondent
for the times of Israel that they have announced the death
of a fourth soldier, a soldier when
a rocket attack against a staging ground
near the Kareem Shalom crossing.
Oops. Like, this is how stupid this guy is.
You can't even read that to recognize
that it contradicts your larger narrative or you don't care.
And obviously we're talking about military presence.
Are we, are we, are you telling us you have a strong,
well even let's just say they do have
a military presence at the crossing.
This guy's admitting that that's not where it was.
We also know that we're gonna show you next
that they were building for the Roth invasion
that they're currently beginning
and that's what they were bombing,
ignoring all of that as well.
Let's not forget that we're talking about an occupied area,
which means they have the legal right to arm resistance.
And every one of these are talking about military targets,
so it doesn't even matter anyway.
It's a legal act of arm resistance regardless of
how upsetting, the upsetting that is to Israelis.
Here isn't the next tweet from Elon saying, RA said,
continued interruption of the entry of aid
and fuel supplies at the Roth
of crossing will halt the critical humanitarian response,
which by the way, we'll get to.
They just took the rough of crossing as well
as the entire area across there
because they're about to do a lot worse.
But he goes, since un RRA has such close ties with Hamas,
oops, you mean the thing we just
literally proved you're lying about?
Or that every government, even your allies,
it says you've never proven.
Doesn't matter. It's just about narrative control.
Has it considered telling Hamas
to not keep shooting mortars at this crossing?
Okay, well, is it Hamas now
or didn't you just say that it was
because they weren't delivering it?
Or is it because it's not there?
You know, just, just keep throwing at the wall.
Whatever works for you in the moment, Elon.
But here's the interesting part.
This was from the sixth, or excuse me, the fifth
Hamas attacked the cream Shalom crossing.
He says four humanitarian aid
claimed the lives of three soldiers.
They immediately jumped at this to try to take advantage.
And I always wanna show you how interesting it is.
Look at the exact framing, the, the emojis.
And here's eima kampus, almost nearly identical.
I guess that's just coincidence, right?
No, they're all getting, they're, they're tweeted you know,
they're, they probably, they're part of the app
that they've all admitted they use,
which is directly tied into the hos, the HaBO, you know,
Israeli propaganda scream where they just go,
here's what you're supposed to say about this.
And they dump it out. That's exactly what's happening.
I mean, how can you miss that? But here's
what somebody responded here saying,
Hamas did not attack the crossing.
They attack the military base. Stop your lies.
No, you could, you blindly take anybody's word on
Twitter, but it is true.
We'll show you next. But people saw it, called it out.
Sarah says, tanks and military vehicles or humanitarian aid.
Oops. Because that's what's happening.
That's what we're dealing with. And here's the point
that somebody else made as well, we'll get
to this is a very big difference between the crossing
for aid and the location that they bombed as even the,
the writer for times of Israel made very clear.
It was a staging area near the crossing.
Next Elon Levy says, with all due respect
to Israel shuttering Al Jazeera,
which we talked about yesterday, which is just another
example of how completely authoritarian
and you know, don't believe in any
of the things they pretend they fight
for first freedom and whatever else.
The real headline. And by the way, it's
because Al Jazeera continues to highlight their lies.
Whatever other interests you think they may have.
It says the real headline out of Israel today is
that Hamas attacked the main humanitarian crossing, just lie
and lie and lie.
Or that Israel took out Hamas command
and control post in an unre facility.
No, it didn't take your pick.
No, they're just bombing everyone alive in the area
by going, then they go, that was Hamas there and this,
and Sheel was a command center and here's a calendar.
You know, that's what they keep doing. Take your pick.
But the idea that they hit the aid crossing is so
that when they say they killed three soldiers,
if you actually understand that,
that makes it a legal target because they're military.
They want you to think it was aid
because that hides the reality is, I mean,
even if you wanna ignore, which I don't know why you would,
the legal reality of the fourth Geneva Convention
and what occupied territories have the right
to arm resistance.
Aren't you bombing their people right now, aren't you?
And let's just pretend it's only Hamas,
even though it's shockingly false.
Doesn't that them give the right
to bomb you back militarily?
Of course not. That's terrorism. How dare you fight back?
My point is they're soldiers
and you're bombing their soldiers.
So wouldn't that just be, yeah, that would be more,
but not when it works on there side.
Oh, you got a boob? Well, you can't allow that.
But he says IDF soldiers killed as at military base
who were preparing for genocide on Rafa, which again,
Nick Knox oleo, which we showed this yesterday, go
through all the, this is where the other person I got it,
I think showing you their military bulldozers,
the multiple tanks, the multiple personnel.
That is what they bombed
because they were getting ready
to undo what they're doing today.
Why wouldn't they bomb that?
And they lied about it because they think
they were just embarrassed.
And here's another one. This is a liberal Zionist
vowing to do better for women.
He says, and just here's what he says,
three IDF soldiers were killed.
Three seriously wounded
and nine injured moderately, lightly.
When at least one Hamas mortar out
of 10 shot hit a staging area outside Gaza.
Where are the troop? We're preparing for the Rafa operation.
I mean, it's just so embarrassing
how easy it is to prove they're lying.
So we have a journalist, we have Israelis on the ground
saying the incident occurred near Kareem Shalom
to the south of Rafa in Israel.
Oops. And here's why net news,
IDF rocket names of, uh, of three soldiers killed.
It says the soldiers were stationed on the border
near Kareem Shalom crossing to guard equipment
of battalions preparing to enter Hamas' last stronghold.
The point is, they're just so desperately in hopes
that you don't see this America,
that you don't see this in the uk.
That we only, that people
that only look at these are people in Israel who hope that
that's what they're doing,
the ones they're aiming at anyway.
'cause not everyone thinks that that's the point.
Think about being in this position where, you know,
everybody can see it if they just barely care to look.
That's gotta be pretty uncomfortable.
Now, suppressed news, which we highlighted
yesterday, did the same thing.
A good debunking of this
and broke down, kind of
compiled the rest of the information.
And the point is that it's easy to prove
that they're lying just like we just showed you.
And that their own media is reporting.
That's not the crossing.
It's a staging area for a military invasion.
But here's what Israel said,
because lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.
It's what happens. At least seven,
injured some seriously in Hamas.
Rocket barrage fired from Rafa area.
Again, I don't know that's where it came from.
I guarantee that if it didn't,
that'd be the best thing they could do
because they want to go Rafa.
I told you, Hamas, even though we've already proven an
and Israeli media and actually people
inside the intelligence, they've already said
that there are Hamas presence everywhere,
even in the areas they claim they've taken.
Which makes sense to me 'cause I haven't seen a single
example of people that they've taken or killed.
But he said what Israel says,
Hamas fired a barrage of rockets.
Now this is from the fifth.
Remember it happened again today. The tr they no again,
Trent, stop the transfer of aid,
the official Israeli account, knowing that's not true
because they know they're committing war crimes.
They know that they're a terrible war.
Crime committing entity has to lie about it.
Just like what they have. The bills passed to make sure
that you are not allowed to talk about all the dark history
of Zionism because that it hurts their national security.
Sort of like the Israel, the US government hiding the
murdering of journalists and
but Julian Hassan's exposed by Reuters journalists killed,
I think it was Afghanistan, right?
And collateral murder
because it's bad for their national security.
No, those are criminals hiding their crimes, guys.
That's what's happening. The rockets were fired near the
Emira hospital in Rafa.
Again, see human shield,
they're using the hospital, they're in Rafa.
None of this seems to be true.
Hama shoots rockets from civilian centers.
That's all they're trying to do. That's,
that tells you everything you need to know.
Oh, is it the, the civilian casualties
and your manipulations and how many times you've lied
and the fact that you use human shield, no,
that's not relevant.
Just focus on our narrative and close your eyes.
Now let's get into what's happening in Rafa Art.
Robert wrote an excellent article today
that I wanna highlight some of the important parts.
He says exactly like I read it as well.
This was exactly what I saw
after just looking at the information yesterday.
Hamas agrees to ceasefire Israel attacks Rafa in response.
Now, as I understand this, it's very simple to see
and all of the evidence backs this up.
Even the corporate media reports
of this from the actual people involved from Egypt and Qatar
and the UN and even the United States as well.
Even. I mean I, I'll just show you right now
how hilariously stupid this is.
This is from April 29th.
This, this is the same deal we're talking about Blinken
hopes Hamas takes Israel's extraordinarily generous.
Tru Offerer . That's what, that's what they said.
Times of Israel reported it then,
and I think, I think this, you could frame it
as Hamas calling their bluff knowing that they knew,
that knowing that they weren't, didn't want them
to take it, took it.
And Israel goes, you're lying.
Like just very clumsily backs away, bombs Rafa,
and go, you, you're the one not doing it
the same way they've been doing the whole time.
The only difference now is that they've set this up
to make it look like a moss was gonna turn
it down and they didn't.
So you can't just change the narrative
because it's already been written.
You've already made the case.
And even the US government is pretending like Hamas didn't
take the deal Now because they all look stupid.
But the worst part of it is we shouldn't be laughing
because they're murdering children right now to get this
to be ignored and,
and by the way, still trying to push some other back
and forth to make it look like eventually Hamas did say no.
Like they're div they've done every single time.
So here's what Robert wrote.
Hamas officials confirmed
that they had accepted a ceasefire proposal on Monday
sharing a copy of the Qatari Egyptian mediated proposal
to Al Jazeera Arabic.
Again, the proposal which wouldn't have been presented if
this was not discussed by the partners on their side, the US
and Israel, 'cause it was,
and you can prove it, the ceasefire,
which the US government reportedly had a hand in.
It says, the week prior to Hamas having studied
and accepted the ceasefire proposal, it was promoted
by no other than us, none other than secretary, uh,
state Anthony Blinken, who called it an extraordinarily
generous proposal and ensuring
that it was a strong agreement when meeting
with family members of Israel prisoners held in Gaza
that basically saying that this is going to happen
unless Hamas says no.
Right? Isn't that what they've done the entire time?
Or where was that? Shoot?
Pretty sure I had that right there. That's weird. Guess not.
Why would it not be right here?
I guess I'm watching, I'm gonna stumble
over it again like I always do, right?
Somewhere where I set it up for myself.
The point was I was gonna show you a tweet
where it's basically saying, you know,
the only thing standing in the way is Hamas, you know,
the only thing stopping the ceasefire is Hamas the lie.
They keep pushing, except it's obviously not true now,
and you can prove that even though
we've been proving that from the first week.
But he says, however, when news broke that Hamas had agreed
to uphold the ceasefire agreement in full,
the Israeli government quickly moved
to kill all hope of it moving forward.
Because the reality we need
to understand is they've never wanted this.
Like you guys, if you guys are watching this show,
you already know this because we have been making this case
from the very first week.
They don't want it. In fact,
I argue they don't even want their hostage back,
which is kind of hard not to see at this point.
Hannibal directive or Elsewise,
I'm not sure you guys can make your own decisions on why.
I think it's clear that they have had endless opportunities.
And even in the first week when it wasn't
as all encompassing as it was now,
because remember even in between this, they took
that middle pause that they then now said, no,
we're not gonna do that anymore because you're using that
to continue your genocide.
But in the beginning, they did have offers for everybody
and they just kept, they lied about it.
Remember the, the narrative was that wasn't even happening.
First action. They came out
and said, the hostages are secondary.
That's their words. We're gonna have to defeat Hamas first.
Then they realized how everybody got mad about that.
So they just washed it away
and pretended like, it's like I keep saying, they just, oh,
well reset then reset.
Here's the narrative. Forget that.
We never said that, how silly that is.
But the point is, from the very first week,
it's been a full exchange for hostages
because that's arguably what they've achi
that tried to accomplish.
Remember the videos we showed you of
them surrounded by Palestinians?
And sure you could argue those Palestinians wanted
to hurt the hostage where they were saying, stop,
this person's under our protection.
It's against our religion.
You're not allowed to hurt this person. Now you can't.
You can argue that everything else was different,
but you just can't keep ignoring the evidence in con in,
in interest of what they tell you you're supposed
to believe with nothing to back it up.
That's not everything,
but most cases are like that in this conversation.
Now, it says the Israeli war cabinet announced
that it could not accept the ceasefire
while US officials refrained from commenting
and claimed they were still studying it.
How would that possibly make sense if it was already put
to them to accept that?
Just such meek, small, petty people.
It says the response of both the US
and Israeli governments tell separate stories about the
nature of the ceasefire agreement while the US claims it
has to study it more.
The Israelis are speaking
as if they have full knowledge of the agreement already.
'cause they do. That's clear.
This either demonstrates that Israel refuses to even go
through the documents or that it knows
what the agreement is already is already
and had no intention of ever accepting it.
Now, yes, you can argue that they maybe just never even
looked at it knowing they were never gonna accept it.
But nonetheless, the point is they had ample opportunity
to know and just were banking on the idea
that Hamas wouldn't accept it
'cause they thought they packed it
full of things they would never accept.
Just like with the Oslo Accords.
And every other time they
pretended they want a two-state solution.
That's what they do. So good on them
for making a strategic move, calling their bluff.
It worked. Now it says, given that the US is involved
and updated on all developments maintaining close ties
with both Qatar and Egypt, it is unlikely
that Washington has not had time to assess the agreement
that by the way they already offered.
Like that's such a stupid thing for them to say
and that they help draft, by the way.
So there's no way they don't know what's in it.
Also supporting the assumption
that all parties had full knowledge
of the ceasefire proposal are the
above mentioned statements from Secretary of State Blinken.
Clearly they knew 'cause they said they better accept it.
It's perfect, combined
with repeated comments from Israeli prime minister Benjamin
Netanyahu over the past days that he doesn't intend to agree
to any ceasefire.
That's the thing is the contradictions,
as I've always shown you going back as far
as I've ever covered Israel, they'll tell you in front
of Congress that we're fighting for the two state Ian
and the evil Palestinians won't let it.
But then he goes right back to Israeli media
and screams about how he'll never let that happen.
And they go, yay. How is it that the media can't do it?
They just ignore it, just
like we're seeing a lot of them do.
Still to this day, Netanyahu has been clear
that it is not going to happen,
and that's what he's sort of going back to when it comes
to the certain circles
that just never, it's not no matter what.
Well then why are we pretending there's agreements going on?
Why are we pretending there's negotiations?
If your point is, it's never, no matter
what, we have to finish this.
It's just, this is the point.
Anybody with logic
and even the smallest shred
of integrity can very clearly see
that logical inconsistency.
But it says Israel has sold, said, excuse me,
that it will send a delegation to Cairo in Egypt in order
to quote exhaust all possibilities of reaching an agreement,
but also pledges to go ahead with an invasion of Rafa.
The Tel Aviv is already approved, right?
'cause the reality is 99%
of people involved in this are trying to get this to happen
to stop Rafa.
So for them saying, we're gonna do that no matter
what is it makes it, it, it, it belies the point.
What we're talking about though is the exhausting
of all possibilities, guys.
This is a desperate move.
If I were, if I were on the side of amass at this point,
which I'm not, if I were,
and I was negotiating on their behalf,
I would be removing myself from this.
We took it, we accepted it.
Let them drown in their lives right now.
Because if you engage right now,
they're gonna pretend like they keep doing that.
The all possibilities was their last retort
and then they returned it down.
That's, it's just this childish back and forth.
That's what they're trying to do right now.
There's no all po exhausting all possibilities.
What's the possibility if your narrative is no matter what,
we're gonna keep going, which is what they're saying.
And it says, according to unicef, an invasion of
of the southernmost, Gaza city of Rafa will put 600,000
children at the risk of a catastrophe.
Most of which I think the whole point was out
of all 600,000, every single one of them are sick
or are hurt, are injured.
That that was the UNICEF claim.
It says below, allowing,
before allowing any time for the, excuse me,
before allowing any time for there to be consideration
of an, of implementing a ceasefire,
Israel began launching indiscriminate,
which is clearly what they were.
I'm gonna show you some pretty hard pictures in a minute.
Bombing attacks in Rafa as well
as against Northern Gaza's Gli refugee camp.
Again, I mean, how many times they've had
to suffer there, where they bombed.
That was the place they claimed they were going
after one person and killed 400,
which as I understand it didn't even turn out to be there,
and yet they just keep bombing a refugee camp.
Why is that not shocking? Because it said Hamas is present.
Well, okay, you mean
that you didn't bomb them out the first three times
you murdered all those innocent people.
Okay, same point from before.
We're supposed to take it on credit
that you somehow got the Hamas members
and all we can see is dead civilians.
Where are the Hamas members? Why are there,
where are the rules based international order?
Why can't they piece this Gordian?
I mean, think about how clear it is
that they're being deceived.
They can't piece this together.
They recognize the obvious that they don't want to,
and these are supposed to be the people
that are leading the world into some new future.
My God as well, by the way, as
as bet hanon another location they've been bombing Israel.
Israeli tanks were also mobilized
to invade the Palestinian side of one
of the Egyptian border crossings into Gaza, attempting
to seize the site and bombarding civilian homes in the area.
As they pushed forward the scenes, these scenes
of horror were broadcast live on Egyptian television showing
explosions and sounds of gunfire.
The point is, guys, they're literally creating, and
before they were already boxed in,
they were already in a position where they had nowhere
to go, even Alma's already being bombed.
That's the point. The reality though, is
that they've now created a situation
where even if Egypt wanted to,
they won't be able to do this.
How does that look like? Trying to let them get out
of the way when you've literally boxed them in.
That's what every reporting is now saying.
Now I'm talking like now in the bot.
Now the campaign ongoing, they have surrounded them
and acting like they're trying to let them leave.
In every other circumstance we've proven the same,
where they say, go to this location,
and then we've proven that they
would shoot them while they left.
They would shoot them on the way they would shoot
them when they got there.
Every single time we've proven that it says Israeli tanks.
Uh, it says these scenes of horror who read that too later.
It says the Israeli military published an official video
showing their tanks operating,
occupying the off of crossing.
Sorry, I'm trying to
clear my throat and it's driving me crazy.
Excuse me.
Okay, where were we?
Did I go down too far?
How did I do that just now?
Where were we
later?
Israel Military publishing official video.
That's, that's the one right there.
Later the Israeli military published an official video
showing their tanks occupying the rough of crossing.
But why is that not a big deal, right?
I mean, is is this the argument, the idea that this is,
I mean the Egyptian, Egyptian involvement, I mean, there's
so many different dynamics that makes that a problem.
But like always they're allowed to do
what they want when they scream that we're,
and we're attacked and out.
Defense laws go out the window, of course,
but Iran can sneeze too hard when they're even in the right
and as terrorism, it says.
Meanwhile, Israeli soldiers publish videos
to their social media accounts
that featured them shooting up
and destroying the area from within their tanks.
We're talking about civilians, guys.
They, they also pulled down Palestinian flags, replaced them
with Israeli ones, which shows you the intent.
It's always been there. These forces
also reportedly murdered 20 Palestinian workers
who were stationed at the crossing, labeling them
as terrorists Australia clip in a minute.
By occupying this crossing,
they effectively blocked all people from travel traveling in
or outta the Gaza Strip.
How do you explain that? Unless they're
trying to take these people out.
In addition to blocking all aid from the two key crossings,
which by the way again has been backed up
by everybody other than Israeli liars,
that's very clearly what we're seeing.
The Kareem Abbu Salem and Rafa crossing aid points.
Israeli forces have also launched a campaign
of airstrikes against more than a hundred different
locations around Rafa.
Clearly as some kind
of like stomping your feet childish action
to get, you just got caught lying.
We all see you, we all can see
that you're holding up the deal.
Even your own people are screaming for you
to accept Hamas' deal, which will show you again.
And what do you do? Freak out
and bomb a bunch of civilians,
almost like you're punishing us for seeing
how dishonest you are.
That's what's happening. Perhaps the worst part it says
of the seizure, of the rough of crossing is
that the same people posting videos
of themselves on social media laying waste
to a civilian crossing for laughs
are now the people controlling whether any aid will
enter the territory at all.
Pretty disgusting.
Now it says, why are the Israelis invading Rafa?
Now it says, if you were wondering what tangible benefit
to Israel's war goals of Rafa invasion could serve,
the short answer is nothing.
Which by the way, has been publicly admitted
by former leaders of the IDF.
We, we just recently talked about this
and I think it was an op-ed entirely written about this.
There is no discernible benefit to this.
It's not the only place some moss is.
We've already proven that and they've admitted
that it's not gonna have some strategic benefit for them.
It's only because of the narrative guys.
Now, since since February,
Benjamin Netanyahu has been repeating the argument
that Israel will lose the war if it doesn't invade Rafa.
His religious fundamentalist coalition partners like
Ben Vere and and Morich have been sworn.
They've openly said this.
I like, there was even something written
in Israeli media about this.
They've sworn to collapse his government
if he doesn't invade Rafa.
That's what's driving this belligerence hatred extremism.
Now, the Israeli media political
and military spokespersons promised their own people
that the invasion of the, of Gaza City, if you remember
specifically Als Shefa Hospital,
would bring the collapse of Hamas.
Remember there's the command center when they
of course failed to find any Hamas headquarters,
they then told their people
that the real Hamas headquarters was kunis,
which also turned out to be a lie.
Now it's Rafa.
They're claiming will be the alleged collapse of Hamas.
These are the kind of things we're pointing out.
The, you know, that the average corporate media can see that
they just don't talk about it.
Why? Why would you, why do you think that is?
Now, since the reality is this,
the Israeli politic political intelligence
and military establishments have no idea what they're doing.
There is no difference in their approach
to Rafa than there has been in any other area of Gaza.
They bomb and shoot anything
that moves, including their own people.
By the way, their forces take drugs
and go on their mobile phones
and film themselves committing war crimes.
They kidnap torture, sexually abuse those in their custody.
They burn down homes
and blow up random buildings for a laugh.
Then they move on to the next area in their
heavily armored vehicles.
Instead of behaving like disciplined armed forces belonging
to a real country, they instead resemble a cowardly
and better equipped ISIS style militia force.
Now, by the way, and aside from the comparisons,
every single thing he proved there, you could see on video,
yet you'll get people screaming
that you're racist for even pointing it out.
Now he says, although these Israelis have had more,
more than four months to prepare a ground operation of Rafa,
the US Biden administration has stated
that it opposes the action.
Why? Because they don't have a clear
evacuation plan for civilians.
Now, how do you possibly explain that?
Four months of them claiming they're working towards a plan
four months of the US going, you can't without a plan.
And now it starts and they're going, well,
we don't agree because they don't have a plan.
How do you not see that as a willful action?
Because their game is to kill the civilians.
Guys, Washington acknowledges that the flow
of aid would be impacted, of course,
and that the civilian death toll would be high.
Which is why they have cautioned against the move, which,
you know, they don't mean
because they've also said Matt Miller in particular,
that he will support the offensive
currently envisioned by Israel.
Oh, well, excuse me, he will not.
That's what the quote says. There will not support the
offensive currently envisioned,
however, goes on
to talk in many different circumstances about limited
strikes and how that's okay.
So speaking outta both sides of your mouth,
pretending like you caution against the thing
that they're doing, but then supporting what they're doing.
Sort of like saying we believe in a ceasefire and civilians
and in vetoing the ceasefire
and civilian, it's just disgusting.
These people are disgusting.
Much of the current is establishment understands
that when the war ends, so too do their careers,
possibly their lives outside of prison.
This is especially the case for Israeli premier Netanyahu,
and that's even in regard to his own people
and his own government, by the way.
So they were never looking to free their prisoners held
by Hamas as a priority.
And they see no way to dismantle Hamas militarily.
They have not even succeeded at destroying any
of the smaller Palestinian arm movements in
around seven months of all out war.
So when Netanyahu pledges
that he will only accept the dismantlement of Hamas,
it means that there will never be a ceasefire deal he's
willing to agree to, and that he only seeks
to drag the war as far as possible.
Now realize he's already said this publicly,
that there's nothing that will stop their war.
So it's clear that that has come to pass.
It's exactly what we're talking about.
Now, there's a point we're gonna get to in a minute
where just like I predicted,
I think it's Ryan Grim calling it out,
that they're now shifting to away from him, us
and just saying that we can't allow Gaza to be a threat,
just like I promised you.
Now, whether they start to point at Palestinian Islamic
Jihad or whatever else, it was never about Hamas alone
because first of all, they're funding Hamas.
Guys, I argue to this very day the leadership, the point is
that obviously it was about maintaining the agenda
and the moment that they act like this is over
or that it's not gonna be accomplished, they just,
it's about generally speaking
and now this is where you come to the point
where it's all Palestinians, which is
what they've been saying the entire time.
As always, excellent work by Robert.
Now here embarrassingly is what Matt Miller had
to say something or will shared Dear State Department.
She writes, it was widely publicized
and verbalized by Hamas that they did accept the plan.
Here he is telling you that they did not accept the
de the ceasefire or the plan.
I simply said, the US government guys,
and you, I think we all know this, somewhere
inside is overrun
and bursting at the seams with absolute cowards, pushovers
and villains, the bulk of coman body, all three
- Approach to go into Rafa, right
after Hamas accepted a ceasefire.
And you know, at the time when many Palestinians were on the
seat with celebrating the possibility of a ceasefire.
- So let me just make one thing clear,
which is Hamas did not accept the of ceasefire proposal.
- How, I mean, think about how shocking that is.
Like again, they lie like a ma as a matter of policy,
but to know that we know that, right?
To know that even in the corporate media, not
that we should trust them, but are openly saying it
because it's the truth.
Egypt and Qatar
and the, I mean the guys, they handed them a DAA document,
Al Jazeera that they gave to them
that they then said yes, right?
So explain this. Well actually let
me finish what he says here in the next part.
- Hamas responded, and in their response
made several suggestions.
It's not the same as accepting the statement that,
uh, was issued yesterday.
That was widely reported, and I'll blame the reporting.
It's what the statement said is not an accurate
reflection of what happened.
They responded as people do in a negotiation process.
But it was not an acceptance.
- My God, what a meek response. Okay?
So the point is, yeah, they did,
they stated it, people reported it.
I mean, you could argue that something
else happened, but how do you explain?
So you hand them a deal, right?
They didn't respond and say, change this and that.
They responded and said, yes,
we'll take it exactly like that.
And so we're to believe that then that was supposed
to go back to Israel for them to change it again.
Why? How does that even make sense?
That's not a negotiation.
That's you changing it after
they've accepted what you gave them.
I mean, you realize how childish this is.
Everybody everywhere knows he's lying
and they just don't care
and realize, again, this is how stupid this is.
This is Blinken talking about that deal
that they put on the table for Hamas to accept.
And they even went as far as to say, I hope Hamas takes,
takes, not offers O notes to takes
Israel's extraordinarily generous truce offer.
They did. Israel then freaks out
and says, no, you never, you're you're a terrorist
and racist and who are you even talking to?
I says, who knows what they're trying to say at this point?
They denied that it ever happened.
Are we not looking at the same article
that Blinken personally is quoted in saying?
I mean, it's just absolutely shockingly stupid,
insulting to your intelligence.
And here's the times of Israel reporting on May 6th.
Yesterday, the US will not support Rafa's offensive
currently envisioned by Israel, just in addition
to the things we were reporting in Robert's article,
but yet supporting the continuation of the bombing.
So we know they're lying about this.
And now they're just shifting into sort of halfway accepting
the response to the acceptance, which is the bombing
of Rafa, which was, which was designed to sort
of the actions of the deceased fire agreement to stop this.
Now, here is ov uh, uh, from 9 7 2 magazine on the sixth,
simply highlighting the bottom line remains
Israel's portrayal of Rafa invasion.
Oh, these are all like backing up the points from Robert
as necessary for a win
for Israel's security does not have legs, any offensive.
And Rafa, in addition to further killing
and destruction in Gaza, will hurt chances
to return hostages.
We know that the hostages know that their families know
that anybody, the brain anywhere else in
the world can see that.
But we still get the lies.
Now, here is in regard
to the back and forth of the ceasefire.
Here's what Reuters first reported. Uh, Ralph alive.
Hamas accepted a ceasefire proposal,
but Israel said it was unacceptable.
Then of course, after further due diligence, guess
what they change it to, which is usually the opposite.
Hamas accepted Gaza ceasefire proposal.
Israel will continue its operation .
You know why they did that? Because
that's ridiculously untrue.
Because once you do the smallest due diligence,
you recognize Israel was involved,
whether it's them pretending they're outside the operation
or not, but they were sent the information,
the US was involved from their side, they offered a deal.
Hamas took it. You don't get
to swing back around and go, nevermind.
Unacceptable. 'cause we don't want you to take the deal.
That's children, you know, that have the power
to murder other children with lots of bombs.
Here's what Elon Levy said, and this is on the sixth.
It looks like Hamas didn't agree to the ceasefire.
It agreed to a ceasefire, right?
That's not how negotiations work. That's me manipulation.
This is what his job is to ca come out,
play the absolute bumbling fool.
He is one anyway, to just lie in hopes
that you water down the obvious truth.
What do you mean A versus D?
The point is, it was offered to them.
They said yes, but this is the best they can do.
, if actually the correct way
to frame it is Elon Levy is the best they can do.
It does not speak for itself.
But here's the point about the people in Israel,
as they want you to think that we're racist
for not recognizing what's going on their families,
which plenty will highlight is not the majority.
I've never thought it was, but a huge, huge portion
of their families are screaming about the fact
that they want them to take the deal.
Now, it's very clear to me that the va, the vast majority
of the families very clearly want this to stop.
Now, I've said every time, that does not mean the same thing
as wanting to stop killing Gaza or Palestinians.
In fact, I think it's the opposite in most cases.
But nonetheless, they've interestingly converged now it says
gathering outside the occupation forces headquarters,
families of Israel, captive of chanting deal Now,
and that's in regard to this deal,
because they're the ones going, they should take it,
and they do, and they turn it down.
They're furious. Again, this is on the sixth
where they're saying, Hama, they better take the deal,
otherwise the country will burn.
You can listen to it yourself. She's speaking in
Hebrew, but that is what she's saying.
And then guess what? On the sixth,
later when they found out they didn't,
these are the families of the hostages setting fire
to the road in Tel Aviv, demanding,
demanding he accept the deal.
Now it's kind of a symbolic fire burning down.
You know, the point is whether they mean politically or
otherwise, the point is these people are livid
and they are pushing back for them to take the deal.
Kind of different than what we're told in the me the the
corporate media here.
Ksi reports of an Israeli woman who was imprisoned
for refusing to serve in the IDF.
She said, I serve in a country, in an army.
If I serve in an army, I don't serve the people around me.
I serve in a cycle of violence or in the army. Excuse me.
So it's an Israeli Jew speaking about
how she's being forced into the military
that she doesn't wanna be a part
of, and they arrest her for it. And
- They feel that being soldier is an honor that they are,
uh, protecting their country.
That they're doing something that is just, uh,
and I mean the Israeli society doesn't accept,
uh, the decision that I make, uh, and doesn't support it.
And I've gotten very harsh threats or comments
or gotten into fights, uh, about this kind of decision.
So very much not a popular, uh, not a popular stance
to take in Israel, w what not before
and especially not now. W
- What do you think it is about your journey
to this position that, that why,
why you have ended up at this conclusion, which is at odds
with so much of so many of your, your own generation?
What, what, what, what is it about your
experiences? I think,
- I mean, I think a lot of it comes to the education
and the way you were brought up.
I think that is true for anyone.
Uh, and when any kind of family that they grow up in,
I grew up in a non Zionist family, Uhhuh ,
but also it very much,
- Very important point.
Doesn't that just, I mean,
again, I could certainly be wrong.
It's always possible, but doesn't that kind
of make an important point right there?
And how many times have we seen that same overlap?
The people that recognize the difference
seem to have a different opinion.
Doesn't that seem to explain it all? It doesn't.
I mean, there's plenty more new dynamics involved
and nuances, but I do think it's an obvious overlap
that the people that are leaning into Zionism
interestingly tend to be the maniacal,
sociopathic ones, which
- Depends on the me action of asking questions,
uh, of when I get to the age where I like everyone else.
Uh, every young person in Israel starts
to think about their military service that they are, uh,
that they have no choice to do.
Um, that is mandatory
- Now, by the way.
I, at least I have an understand it.
There were, there's ways to work around
that maybe that could be, maybe I'm wrong.
This was from a long time ago that I looked into.
But the point being that there were like academic outlets
you could take that would then give you like a pass.
But nonetheless, there's, you have to engage with that.
Like, so that's an interesting thing to think about.
You know, it's not just a draft. It's like you're forced
into the military for very obvious reasons.
And I think the vast majority have to, that's pretty crazy.
- And that when I got to the kind of age that I started
to think about it, I also started to ask myself questions.
If I go and sell in the army, what does my time mean?
What does that service mean? Who does it help?
What kind of cause am I actually serving if I go
and invest that time? Um,
- Americans should be listening to this as well.
Guys, the same thing for joining the US military
and recognizing what their true objectives are right now.
That doesn't mean that the intentions
of many of them are bad.
Most of them think they're fighting for freedom.
So we should actually praise that.
But realizing that the ultimate end game is not,
and recognizing that joining
that is only gonna end up compromising your
integrity, your morals. I think this is important.
- And when I started asking those questions,
I also got answers.
And I, I realized that if I go
and sell in the army, I don't sell the people around me.
I sell a cycle of violence and I legitimize
and normalize the cycle of violence, right?
Uh, and it became, uh, it became clear to me that I have
to not just not enlist,
but I have to take action against it.
- That's some courage right there that I, you know,
it respect.
That is the kind of person
that I wanna surround myself with.
Somebody who, whether I agree with their political politics
or not, that they have the right kind of mindset to recog.
I mean that, think about the courage it takes to do that,
especially where she is now.
Here's another example. Again, this is why I tend
to think it's more than we realize General strike, uh,
Terrance Daniels points out things
you won't see on the corporate media.
A huge crowd of Israelis blocking Tel Aviv highway
demanding Netanyahu except the deal.
You know, the deal that he offered and they accepted that.
He then pretends he's not like, that's how,
it's not even accepting, it's just letting them accept.
It really is what's happening right now.
But here they are not just a small group.
There's a lot more than you realize of people
that are at the very least fighting for them
to take the deal to stop this for their families,
but at the very least, are not on the side
of this currently, the way it's going.
Now, I showed you this yesterday.
I mean, this is just, this is even from Harts from yesterday
with the talks on the verge of collapse.
Netanyahu puts up a rejectionist front saying
that Netanyahu is considered
to be the main obstacle to this.
I know, shocking. It's always been there.
You find a lot of this reporting from Israel
that shows you the thing that we're being lied
to about in America's constant.
Now, Alan Mizrahi points out something interesting.
Now, this is about the bigger picture as well, he says,
and again, he's, he's an Israeli Jew in Israel saying,
I don't know what kind
of picture you're getting from international media sources,
but what's happening in Israel is profusely clear, kind
of the thing that we're talking about, right?
The idea that it's, if you just,
if you just pull yourself outta the propaganda machine,
you can actually see very clearly
what Netanyahu's saying to his own people.
It says, multiple members of this government, excuse me,
including Netanyahu
and Minister of Defense Gallant,
announced many times in the past that they,
that the operation of Rafa is happening no matter what,
despite the fact that bling in
and the rest of them use that, that's what I was kind
of saying before about the game they were playing.
They were always planning to do this,
but they were using it as a leverage tool,
says Israel will not agree
to stop the war under any condition.
This is also the opinion of the majority of Israelis.
He says the ones demonstrating are a relative minority,
and even they will not disobey an order
to join the reserve units and go into Rafa.
He says, also, for any means and purposes, all means
and purposes, excuse me, the operation already started,
which as I've been saying, they've been bombing Rafa for,
for a month, if not longer.
And it says, Israel has taken control of the Rafa crossing
and it's bombing and is bombing Rafa extensively.
This is today. He posted this, the White House
and the Egyptians are helping Israel
by putting this operation under a cloud of fake doubt.
There is no doubt it is happening.
The Americans will blame Hamas for the failure
of the negotiation soon is my best guess.
I agree with that. It's, it's not already happened.
That's gonna be like blinking or somebody else coming out
and saying it was Hamas' fault.
Even though we all see the truth.
It says, so don't let this coordinated psyop campaign derail
your revolutionary enthusiasm.
If I can't call, if I can call with that, he says, prepare
to march and demonstrate like you never have.
Israel is going into Rafa.
The US and the West are helping Israel,
and only a huge international protest movement can save the
remaining children of Gaza.
Now, you can disagree with that, but I,
I, I think, I love his sentiment.
I think we need to start thinking like that.
Now, Alii points out, first of all,
Israel says from the prime minister's office,
the war cabinet that unanimously decided this evening,
Israel will continue its operation in Rafa in order
to apply military pressure on Hamas so as
to advance the release of our hostage,
which they're completely counterintuitive
and achieve the other objectives of the war,
pretending like the hostages are their primary objective.
They've stated that's not the case more than
once in the first couple of weeks.
The point is that
as their own families are saying the operation is what's
putting them in danger, why?
'cause they've killed them many times, I think by design.
But either way, that's what's happening.
As Kaisei points out, if Israel had agreed
to the ceasefire today, they would've freed the hostages.
There you go. Instead, Netanya chose to bomb Rao
where they are likely being held.
Israel does not wanna ceasefire.
Israel does not want the free hostages to free them.
Israel wants to murder every last
Palestinian who would occupy the land.
I think that's very obvious right now.
And as Saul Rod points out, why would anybody be surprised
that Israel rejected a ceasefire deal
that would release all hostages when the US already vetoed
un ceasefire resolutions more than once?
That would've done the same thing months ago.
It was never about hostages, guys.
And again, the framework agreement aims at the release
of all Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip is their claim,
but it's provably not the case.
Elon Levy, in response to Antonio Guerra saying,
I am disturbed and distressed
by the renewed military activity in
Rafa by the Israeli Defense forces.
I urge the government of Israel to stop any escalation
and engage constructively in ongoing diplomatic talks.
As always, they just can't.
I mean, Elon Levy in particular,
it doesn't matter if it's a logical statement
or not, you can't let them make you look like
the evil villain that you are.
So he goes, well, I'm disturbed.
This is usual shtick
and distressed by the fact
Hamas is still holding 132 hostages, who is starving,
torturing, raping and executing.
But that's just me. So just lie, lie, lie.
And 132, you know isn't true
because they've already proven to you
that you have killed most of them.
But they want that number to be stuck
because they wanted to eventually look if they have to,
like they're not returning the one they
should or that they killed them all.
That's the game that's already being played.
Now, I'm not gonna dismiss the possibility
that they have killed some of them or that some
of them died in other processes.
But the bottom line is we can prove more than anything else
that IDF bombings have killed them.
Their own people have come home
and they still tell you that.
So the idea that you just were, you ignore the fact
that everybody wants you to stop this, that
what you're doing is illegal, that the deal
that you put forward, you're now denying.
But all you can do is kind of just turn it back on 'em
and say, well, I'm distressed about the thing that,
what does it have to do at this point?
In fact, what it does is show that you don't care about them
because that's where you are going to,
you're bombing where they're held.
But the point is again, that this guy's either not smart
enough to realize the contradiction
or is so desperate they need to just push in something
that water muddies the waters.
Columbus, this is my point, Israel.
Israel initially negotiated for 40 living hostages,
then 33 living hostages.
Now, the best offer from the terrorists is 33,
not all whom are alive.
Okay, well, at the end of the day,
the bottom line is we can prove
that you have killed them with your bombings.
So the way that she keeps playing this is
that means they've killed them all.
Which first of all, you can't prove neither can I,
but we know for a matter of fact
that you killed some of them.
So at least I can prove that that's not accurate.
But they don't care about accuracy,
as I said, you know why they're dead.
You're just too much of a coward to admit it.
And here's a great breakdown,
three minutes long from Dan Cohen about the Hannibal
directive and the provable evidence
that they have lied about most of what's happening.
And here are some of the hostages
who have come back from Gaza saying,
Israel military shot at the tractor, taking the hostage
to Gaza, killing her mother, injuring her
and her daughter and her brother.
We're supposed to ignore that.
That's one of many who have continued to say that.
And this is about October 7th.
But after that, we've got the evidence
of them bombing them in Gaza
or shooting them when they come out saying,
please save me, pop pop, they're dead.
The other guy runs away, comes out 20 minutes
later, please don't shoot me.
Kills him. Two people shoot him all on the record
or the other hostages that they've gassed to death
with their supposedly not deadly gas.
And the mother called that out because the report proved it.
Even though they lied about it, Hamas did.
It doesn't matter.
Now, interestingly enough, this came out today.
Hamas claims another person was killed
with the current raha bombings making our point.
Now, you could argue they're taking advantage,
which I don't know why they wouldn't
not supporting what they're doing.
What I'm saying is from a logical strategic perspective,
you could argue, of course they could take it,
they would take, yeah, you killed more.
They could be lying about it.
But at this point it's already been
clear that they've said that.
And every time they have, it's later been backed up
by other hostages.
So as they're bombing Rafa, the point makes itself,
they could be at the very least,
killing the very people they claim their
objective is to save.
Clearly that's not true. And Assad rah points out as well.
Israel's, oh, this is the one I was looking for earlier.
Blinken says, the only thing standing between the people
of Gaza and ceasefire is Hamas.
Clearly not true.
And Israel strikes Rafa targets hours
after Hamas agrees to the ceasefire.
That's the truth. Now, in interest of time, actually,
because I've already gone over this for the most part,
I was gonna include this Al Jazeera article again,
why they don't want them to be there highlighting the
breakdown of the deal and that yes, it was obvious
what happened, that yes, they offered it.
Yes, Tomas accepted. Yes,
Israel scrambled away acting like nothing happened.
But you can break down the three phase
breakdown we read yesterday.
In fact, if you wanna check that out, it's very clear.
It essentially is a staged delivery of an exchange
that ultimately leads to a ceasefire
that's hopefully lasting
and the removal of their people of,
of Israel people on the ground.
Again, my point has always been, you know, as well as I,
that there's no reason that that could happen.
And literally 24 hours later,
they could just go right back to doing what they're doing.
They could argue they shot a rocket
or whatever, or just not even care.
Why wouldn't they do that? They're the ones claiming they're
a big threat and in the meantime,
they get all their people back
and they can't piece that, that
that puzzle together.
Clearly they don't want them back.
There's a thousand things that makes that clear, guys.
Now, Israeli negotiators, as we pointed out earlier,
scramble after Hamas accepts the cease file proposal.
Great article by the cradle,
but just wanna highlight a team
of mid ranking Israeli officials will travel
to Cairo in the coming hours to see if Hamas will agree
to changes, which is so stupid
because they offered it, they accepted it,
now they're offering changes and they're not even
sending their main people.
As Reuters reported, that says, while confirming
that Israel would not accept the current proposal,
but if not all of Israel, to to, to accept it, they did and,
and they sent it, they accepted it.
It's on them to acknowledge the
agreement they've already made.
But it says this delegation is made up of mid-level invoice.
Were there a credible deal in the offering?
The principles would be heading
to the delegation says an Israeli official.
So they, they can't even, they, it's like they can't help
but be so ignorantly smug.
Why would you say that right now? 'cause you want it.
You wanna act like none of nothing. They're doing matters.
We're more important. The point is, you just admitted
that this isn't even important to you.
Well, if it even was important, we would even,
we would send the real people, but we're sending some low
level people because it's not even a real offer.
How, how else do you take that?
But this is a game that the offer,
which could end the killing
and bring your own people home is just kind of a small deal.
We don't even care. Yep, exactly.
Netanyahu has formally announced the rejection
of the hostage deal, even though again, it was on them
to reject since they were the ones that offered it
and they accepted while claiming negotiations will persist
again, I promise you, even if Hamas doesn't even come back
to the table, they're gonna act like they put it forward
and Hamas doesn't even care.
That's what you will hear. I promise you.
They've lied about it 15 times already
and I've proven it to you at least half of those.
Now I'm gonna skip this as well.
Actually, I'll play a part of this. This is the one from
Mesan with, what's his name?
Jonathan, uh, con, con ruckus.
The general, I think spokesperson for the IDF,
the very least says no surprises here.
Marias and I discussed the situation in Rafa
and Hamas', latest lies regarding our hostages.
I represent Israel, guess who he represents?
Like they just can't help themselves.
He's not saying he supports a moss, he's just arguing
that you're lying about the other side.
But to you, if you're not blindly Zionist supporting,
then you're a terrorist prorate, pro mob,
anti-Semitic maniac, just dumb, dumb,
dumb, all the way to the bottom.
Broad stroking, no evidence, claiming what you are
as the only thing that makes me, it's dehumanization,
which I am no fan of mesan,
but it's pretty stupid
to just argue he's representing Hamas like
he's there as their representative.
That is the kind of leadership you get from Israel.
Why wouldn't you just come out and be
like, here's why he's wrong.
Let me prove to you that that would be
what a respectable person would do.
But when you know that you're lost, when you know
that you're caught, what else can you do?
Here's, I wanna play just the beginning of this,
- Your fellow at the Foundation for Defense of democracies
and the former IDF spokesperson,
retired Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Conki, also
the editor in chief and chief
and CEO of eo Medi Hassan Medi.
You, I know you have an exclusive report about a letter
that Republican senators sent
to the international criminal court.
We will get to that in just a few minutes,
but I wanna ask you about this reporting about Hamas saying
publicly they've agreed to a ceasefire deal,
but it's really kind of a counter proposal that they have
- Setting the lie.
Is that what an interviewer's supposed to do?
Let me set the narrative for the challenge.
Like, so if the idea was to have them discuss it,
why are you setting the narrative?
You're, here's the lie, go. That's not what happened.
I'm sure that's what she stupidly thinks happened
because she was given some sheet that says that not
what they actually think.
It's not what happened.
Even ne if you have blink in saying they better accept this
because it's a whole big deal, it's obvious
that this was not what happened.
Now Israel's also trying to now lay it,
lay it on the US acting like they did something wrong,
showing you that nothing is sacred to them.
They will attack their own allies the
moment it suits their interest.
You know, just like the US
- That includes elements
that they know Israel never agreed to. So
- Yeah, they did.
Yes they did. Like this is, they're trying
to pretend like they put things in it they knew Israel
wouldn't agree to because you're already setting the
argument that it was Hamas that didn't want this.
They didn't add anything.
Guys, that's the most obvious part of this.
Let's just say you wanna argue
that Israel didn't know about it,
which is kind of what they're trying to pretend.
You can easily prove that Hamas didn't add anything.
They just said, yes, we agree to what you put in front
of us, and yet here's a CNN anchor saying they knew they
added things that they wouldn't accept.
Why? Because that's what Israel does every time.
Who do you think gave them that narrative?
- So was this some kind of propaganda effort by Hamas
to say, we're at the table, we're agreeing to something,
- Which by the way, is what they've done every
single time in reverse?
- Well, look, the reporting we have, uh, says that yes,
it was an Egyptian Qatari proposal
that the Americans were involved in too.
I mean, the CI director,
bill Burns has been involved in this.
Um, the Israelis apparently were on board until, of course,
Hamas agreed, and then the Israelis bluff was called,
and now they're saying, well, we don't agree
to this proposal because we wanna free the hostages,
even though the proposal would help free the hostages.
- Isn't it shocking how easy to see that is?
That's the truth and,
and the logic of how yes, that would've freed the hostages.
But their argument is, we need to go into Raffa
to free the hostages, and if we take
the deal, we can't free the hostages.
I mean, it's like the stupidest circular
logic I've ever hurt my life.
It it, the, the very statements contradict themselves.
- I can I just pause you there for a, a second there,
- Writing the newspaper.
- I just wanna, I just wanna add a one bit of information of
- Course, because as the interviewer, you have
to make sure you nail down, like he's,
you're not even letting him talk.
You're, you're, you're debating him at this point.
It just shows you how clear these people are
and narrative managers
cuts them off right in the middle of a
- Sentence, this proposal, because we wanna free the
hostages, even though the proposal would
help free the hostages.
- I can I just pause you there for a second
- There. Writing newspaper.
- I just wanna, I just wanna add a one
- Information.
- I think's here the part that Israel didn't agree to is
that the part that that calls
for a permanent end to the war and
- Which it didn't really do.
We read the two yesterday.
I mean, ultimately it ends with a ceasefire
and an agreement that you're ceasing
hostilities, but that does not end.
I mean, there's, let's just say, let's say the day
after that Palestinian Islamic jihad did something, well,
they would attack them and you know that.
So the point is that this is not the end to anything.
They could make a thousand reasons to do it.
This is just an illusion to
make it seem like they shut it down.
They're the ones that put it forward.
- And I think this is really what is at issue here.
That Israel has never agreed to that,
and that maybe this is a counter proposal,
but that means essentially that everybody has to get back
to the table and agree to what is on the table now.
- Oh, okay. What is, who is on the table now?
They're so bad at their jobs.
She was gonna say what is real before?
So the whole point is,
the only way this ends is if you agree to
what Israel wants, don't you understand?
You racists. I mean, that's what he's shooting.
But e either way, that's what is Israel is on the table.
Well, okay, so all you're saying is the same thing.
Not until they come back and accept what we put forward.
So let's just say haha comes back and the pretend back
and forth and says, okay, but then we add this.
Okay, well then you could say it ends
when Israel accepts it.
It's not the same point. Well, no, it only works one way.
You're a racist.
- Yeah, but let me just say, in
what world is Hamas gonna say,
we're gonna release all the
hostages and you carry on killing us.
Exactly. Obviously outside world America,
Western countries has been wanting a ceasefire for a while.
We were told Hamas was the obstacle,
and now they're calling Israel's bluff.
The reality is, Abby, that the obstacle
to a hostage deal has always been Benjamin Netanyahu.
And those are not my words. Those are the words
of Heim Rubenstein, the former spokesperson
for the hostages family who told the Israeli press last week
that Netanyahu's been the obstacle.
He says that they found out there was a deal on the table
back on October 9th, 10th
to get hostages released. But netan
- Shocking breaking news.
What Ryan's been telling you for seven months, ,
well, welcome to the independent
media. If you're new to the show, Yahoo
- Hid it from them.
Those are the words of the spokesperson for the Israeli
families of the hostages. And he,
- And by the way, that's not what I'm tell
that was a provable fact in the first
week directly from people involved.
I was proving it to you this entire time just in case
you're new, right?
This is not hard to see and I wasn't the only one.
There's plenty of other independent media just recognizing
this medi Hassan breaking moment on CNN
that they even disregard is not new information.
And if anybody anywhere in this conversation was honest,
that would've been the talking
point from the very beginning. But they're not
- Hi it from them because he knows that if he agrees
to a hostage deal, his fascist colleagues
and his coalition government will collapse as government.
This is Israeli domestic politics, which
- We just, which we just talked about, by the way.
That's true. They're, they're threatening
to collapse the government if they don't.
So he's just a puppet at this point for his own,
for his own extreme parts of his government.
- Colonel, what about that?
I mean, if the hostages are all released,
shouldn't Israel seriously consider ending hostilities in
Gaza and allowing for a political settlement
that leads to the future?
- Now think about the question as always.
What do you think is gonna happen?
Is he gonna honestly engage
with the dynamic and say, well, yes.
I mean that makes sense. It's logical
and we do want our hostage back,
but lemme explain why that doesn't meet our neat.
Nope, .
- Yeah, I'm listening to the second edition of, uh,
METI Hassan's monologue that I saw earlier.
- So first an attack on him personally. Okay?
- And it's not surprising that, uh,
you're parroting Hamas talking points.
- Okay? You call him Hamas classic.
Wait for it's racist probably coming soon. Uh,
- Really the, let's put things here in perspective.
We have a terrorist organization
that abducted civilians and soldiers
- Oh, back to October 7th.
Got it. See how that works?
It's, I mean, you could have, you could have guessed exactly
what would happen because that's all they have.
Now you look even many songs like, oh, come on.
Like we're, they're just,
we recycling the same talking points like Ryan Mast,
like all the rest of the blind following paid off members
of Congress that are fighting
for a foreign country at the expense of Americans.
It's crazy. And even if you agree
with everything they think about
that we're still talking about seven months later
and an ongoing genocide
and the interest to stopping that
to just re just pull it back to
what happened seven months ago.
It's, it's perverse at this point.
- They're the ones for the last four months have been
refusing any deal that Israel the
- Lie, lie, lie, lie.
I mean, I'll just leave it there. I I wanted
to play a little bit more, but just for time.
I mean, but that these are lies, guys. Lies, provable lies.
Ryan Grim. This is what I was making earlier.
This is alarming.
Now, this is a diplomatic Christian affairs
correspondent for times of Israel.
There's a whole thread, but the point is, he says,
Israel will achieve its war objectives.
A senior Israeli official tells me, quote,
we will destroy Hamas' military
and governing capabilities, free the hostages,
even though those are contradictory at this point,
and ensure that Gaza does not pose a threat
to Israel in the civ civilized world in the future.
And you could argue they mean the same.
But I agree with Ryan. I think it says Israel shifting from
saying their objective is to make sure Hamas is not a threat
to saying that they want to ensure
that Gaza does not pose a threat.
I mean, you obviously see how that can shift.
It's, it's mission creep.
It's what they do every single time.
And I knew it was coming. We're going to see that.
I promise you, even if they actually destroy Hamas,
which is probably not likely
or possible, they will shift to one of the other groups.
Now, the last point is just to show you
what has happened since this is what you've seen.
Others gonna be some graphic stuff here.
First of all, Dan Cohen highlights,
and this is going from today forward moments
before invading Zionist soldiers blast rams horn
and chant Let us destroy Rafa.
That's, that's what's happening on video on the record.
The many of them posted on their own social media,
they're all pretty yay, destroy it all.
And yet they pretend if you listen to the corporate media,
the, any blinking
and Biden, that they're pinpoint targeting Hamas
and they're getting all the people outta the way.
And it's that easy to prove.
I don't think I had that in there. Yeah, it's just them.
You, you can just listen to it.
It's in Hebrew and they're just singing and chanting.
Now, this is an interesting clip in regard to the beginning
of the cutting off of the crossing.
This was earlier, earlier, earlier today.
It says the route of crossing is closed,
cutting off the lifeline for 1.5 million people.
The same group that's has been screaming
that they're their only one allowing aid
through has now just officially cut down the crossing in
general for the beginning of a military operation.
And here's what the report says on the ground.
Al Jazeera, of course, because that's, this is why they're
so desperate to hide what their reporting,
- Israeli military is still operating
inside rough high crossings.
And we did look at videos and,
and footage emerging from the area, uh,
through official telegram accounts belonged
to the Israeli military
associated with the Israeli military.
But it's showing a great deal of damage caused by tanks
and armored vehicle causing great deal of vandalism inside,
uh, the, uh, the crossing, uh, the crossing and property.
- Uh, and what he's talking about, by the way,
are the soldiers just like everywhere else they go,
showing you that they, apparently they have no control over
their like, crazy IDF Like, I mean, how many examples?
Like don't you think they, so
that they're either completely okay
and even even supporting
the actions they're taking, the way, the stealing
of lingerie and jewelry and the destroying of their homes
and the assassinations, you know,
or they're just so completely out of control
that they're not a real professional military
as he pushes every time that they just don't have control,
they don't have integrity, they don't have any kind
of discipline because right now you saw 'em take this
crossing and as Robert covered,
and you can see in video, they're just driving their tanks
around laughing and blowing things up. These are children.
- It solved. Israeli military started the early hours
of this morning under heavy cover of intense bombing
by artillery, shelling by, uh, by attach jets,
by the quiet capers in, in the area of, uh, the vicinity
of the crossing, as well as the, uh,
attack drones at the eastern part, uh, of ity.
What's going on right now did not,
did not stop at just the text message
or the phone calls that sent to people.
People right now are forced to evacuate under heavy, uh,
intense bombing campaign at the,
- I don't miss that, right?
They, yeah, they love to drop some leaflets that by the way,
in very aggressive nature,
say, get out or we're gonna murder you.
It's basically what it's translating to.
They're bombing them out of the way.
Does that sound like what you
do for people that you're trying to save?
Obviously not. Or bombing where they end up going
or shooting them on the way, which has happened every time
- Eastern part of Rafa City.
And the fact that there's Israeli military right now is
operating inside the crossing itself,
cutting off the only lifeline right now to, uh,
the people in Gaza, particularly for the 1.5 million
displaced Palestinians, uh, here in Rafa, uh,
city at this point.
Uh, this land, the crossing has been vital within the past
months allowing the, uh, humanitarian aid to go through it,
even though it was at a very low level,
at a very low capacity.
But it still, it provided a lifeline for people.
It crammed in this a small part of the goggle script. Now
- We're seeing another point
that I wanna point out right there for why they,
if I would ask why they might allow any in, right, is
that if you don't allow any aid through by this point,
you would've, it would've been scenes
like you would've never imagined.
You know, people literally like skin
and bones dying, collapsing in front of cameras everywhere.
I mean that, that let, this is, I can't believe they're able
to pretend this isn't happening.
But that'll, that would've been something
and nobody could have disregarded.
So that's, uh, one of the argument arguing reasons.
Now they can make it a slow dripping process
that they could just casually blame on Hamas.
That's, you know, pretty, pretty
disgusting. But that's what's happening
- With the Israeli military presence here.
All landed crossings are closed right
now by Israeli military. And this is
- All closed.
That's the truth. Just to keep lying about it. Uh,
- It see sort of ceiling off the Gaza strip
and cutting it off from the remaining parts
of the surrounding regions.
- So here's what happened after that.
Well, first of all, this, this was from the sixth yesterday.
Israeli, these are images
and satellite images that were re they were showing you
that they were reinforcing
their military around the borders.
Satellite imagery obtained by Al Jazeera revealed
that positioning of nearly 300 military vehicles on the
outskirts of Rafa, a city now housing
over a million displaced people.
They were boxing them in today.
It's even more clear, Maggie Tran reports
that the IDF is now in control
of the entire Philadelphia axis along the
Egyptian border in Gaza.
Now, there's that there, I mean, there's multiple aspects
of crimes in my opinion, in regard to both the Egyptian side
and what's happening to Gaza.
This is a breach of the Egyptian Israeli peace deal of 1979,
also known as the Camp David Accords.
According to the agreement, Israel is not allowed
to station any military units in Zone D, which consists
of a narrow strip of land along the entire Egyptian border.
But they don't care. Why? Because they don't.
There's a narrow care. There's nothing sacred at all.
And these people argue the Zionist government
that if they need to, it's the, it's okay
because it's what we need to do.
Self-defense, you're racist.
It's the same as everything else we've talked about there.
As they've said many times, we can
legislate anywhere in the world.
The international law doesn't apply to us.
The, if you don't believe that, it's easy to look up.
They've said it more than once publicly in the Knesset.
Same point applies here. 'cause they want it to.
So they have now completely blocked them in
and are currently bombing them.
You explain how that doesn't make, how that makes sense
of saving the people they claim they're trying to save.
IDF Hamas terror targets bombs their strikes terror,
excuse me, IDF strikes Hamas terror targets in East Rafa
terror targets, you know, also peppered with a lot
of civilians if no terrorists at all,
but who care terror targets in East Rafa.
Isn't that the place that you've been telling us
until 30 seconds ago
as the safe zone that you've been keeping safe?
And if not, why'd you let TOMA in there
if you told them to go there?
Because that's the safe zone.
Doesn't that imply that you let it become the not safe zone?
It's just, it's nobody's, it's everybody else's fault.
Again, like you're in kindergarten, right?
Don't, you can't take responsibility for your eye.
Everything they say continues
to be pushed out to somebody else.
At the end of the day, it's obvious that they did nothing.
That they've just been torturing these people,
displacing them, bombing them on the way, laughing about it,
murdering them on the side, starving them along the way,
bombing every location and then posting about it on TikTok.
This is one of the journalists on the ground highlighting
that they have killed 20 executed.
He writes 20 Palestinian employees at the R of crossing.
I dunno why we would even dispute that. This is possible.
It's been the seemingly the only
consistent thing of the whole process.
And re remember, they just killed workers in Lebanon.
Civilians. Now, sir Li Bean highlights
that the bombing continues to contin it has been ongoing
for month 1.7 million people, half of them children.
Now, their carpet bombing the area
as this was even being reported by Al Ja zero.
Look at this, guys. That's not some small bombing,
that's not some one 10 attack.
That is a massive bombing
that I can guarantee you killed a lot of civilians,
Sarah Abdullah rights the same.
Israel still intensely bombing Rafa right now.
This is today targeting
residential homes and killing civilians.
Bodies of children are being found under the rubble.
Now, I i i, I recommend if you've got children, that some
of these next things are gonna be hard to see.
But I, a and, and by the way, the reason I used it
for the picture today, I believe it's important
that we truly see what this is.
And I know most of you know that.
But this is, this is, this is something
that we really need to understand.
This is what they're doing. This is a random soccer
player, football player.
And wherever you are in the world, been killed
by an Israeli airstrike on his family home in Rafa,
here are the children that you can see.
Now, I recommend, you know, again, this is rough
to see guys, these are dead children
that have been collapsed in the building
that they're desperately trying to dig out.
And this is Max Blumenthal saying, here's
what Israel did in Rafa.
This is what it's, this is what its road
to total victory looks like.
God here,
this is one of the hardest things I've seen.
I don't know why this hit me so hard.
I mean, it's obvious why,
but of all the things we've seen, a father tries
to comfort his son while he is receiving medical treatment
as he was severely burned
and injured in Israeli airstrike on Rafa.
I think it's really just the fact that he's trying
to hug his son and he can't even do that.
I just don't know how anybody can pretend this is
not exactly what it looks like.
Here's the picture we use today.
As Sarah Wilkinson writes, well Done world.
The Israelis take Rafa close the border.
No medicine, no aid, no intervention.
The international community has excelled itself this
time, right?
So you, you go in there.
Aren't you just trying to save all these people? What?
Why didn't you bring any help for them?
This is what they're doing. And guys,
these are not some hype.
These images themselves have been reported
and have been seen by people on the ground.
Doctors journalists, watch this happen.
This, this has gotta be one
of the worst things I've ever had to cover in my life.
This is the worst thing I've ever had to cover in my life.
And it's not just the worst because it's so shockingly bad.
It's the worst because people that are pretending to be good
are the ones telling you this is okay.
This is not wrong. It's actually the right thing
that we're defending ourselves, that these people are bad.
It just, it's, it's going to sit with me for the rest
of my life that we didn't, didn't do more to stop it.
Here's a Saul Rod.
Today I saw a Palestinian man pick up the pieces of flesh
to put in a body bag,
a child's lifeless body pulled from the rubble
and a little girl being carried out
with a blood soaked face.
And then I saw American students get arrested by riot police
with batons for protesting the horror.
We just showed you this yesterday.
BM reports the fact that they're sitting around the table
before this just happened.
And here's what the Israelis are
saying in their news discussion.
I think we should have gone into Rafa yesterday already.
There are no uninvolved civilians there.
You have to go in and kill and kill and kill.
We have to kill them before they kill us.
This is what they're teaching people.
Not everybody believes it.
Not every VA June, not every Palestine Israeli.
Clearly a lot of them. Majority it seems. But not everyone.
This is what they're teaching people.
This is why they grow up to think this.
This is Simon Shiman, Boker vice president, vice chairman
of the world, LACO, the international arm
of Netanyahu's own party.
We need to go in there and kill, and kill and kill.
That's what they're promoting.
That's what our media can't recognize.
That's what Biden can't acknowledge or Trump or RFK Jr.
Here's a so rah also pointing out the UN
has publicly made it clear.
Operations in Rafa will be a tragedy beyond words.
The WHO incursion in Rafa will plunge crisis in Gaza
to unprecedented levels.
Doctors without Borders, nowhere in Gaza is safe.
Human rights watch, forcing this displaced Palestinians out
of Rafa is catastrophic.
Everybody else you could imagine this has
to stop Wall Street Journal.
Why Israel must take Rafa.
It's the last sanctuary for Hamas' military battalions.
That's not true. Even their own people say that's not true.
This was written yesterday. Great job journalism.
Mossad Rah also points out in New York Times.
This is how they wrote this article.
Two dozen Bodies brought to Rafa Hospital.
Doctors say, what a good, what a great reporting.
What happened to them? What and why are they?
It's just so many. As she makes a clear point,
here's how it should read.
Israel kills over two dozen, over uh, um,
over two dozen over, uh, overwhelming Rafa Hospital.
That's what happened. They know that.
Not even Israel's denying that. What a weird way to say.
Israel's already killed a dozen Palestinians in Rafa
and hospitals have no capacity
because Israel attacked, attacked them.
'cause that's the truth. Here's a, here's a video that,
by the way, and he makes a great point about this, as much
as the TikTok weird video that I hate.
He makes a great point. We've shown you this video.
But his point that I like is that he said, look,
I showed you this back in February.
Nobody wanted to listen.
Now we're watching it happen in Rafa
- Past 215 days of this genocide watch.
- And if you don't remember, the video is showing you the
different segmented areas and how they said move.
You gotta move because this is not the safe area. Go there.
And then they bombed 'em all there.
And then they move them over there.
And by the way, every time bombing back where they were
as well and where they're going, that's been proven,
but shifting them along,
bombing them the whole way along. That's the truth.
- Remember when they told everyone to move down south,
it's gonna be safe down south.
Watch. The
crazy part is I showed you guys this 135
days into this genocide.
We are 80 more days into this genocide
and we are literally witnessing the same thing.
Close to 40,000 innocent people have been murdered.
Tens of thousands are still under the rubble.
And now everyone's here down in the south in Rafa,
in their bombing Rafa.
There are over 1.5 million innocent Palestinians
that have been displaced in the south of Gaza,
in Rafa right here.
Over 600,000 of them are children.
The aid, the food, the waters all in that area.
And now Israel's indiscriminately bombing this area.
Now mind you, all of these people are living under tents.
They're indiscriminately bombing this area,
dropping leaflets from the sky,
telling them it is no longer safe to be there.
They have to leave. Where are they supposed to go?
Literally, where are they supposed to go?
There is nowhere else for them to go.
How can you look at this visual demonstration
and not call this a genocide,
not call this an ethnic cleansing, not call for a ceasefire.
So we need you now more than ever to keep posting,
keep sharing, and do not stop talking about Palestine.
- Exactly. Now that, remember,
that clip's put from a while ago,
then we played that as well.
It's a great graphic. It's important
'cause it's hard than deny, but that the,
the argument being made by some of these, you know,
pro genocide Zionists, if you will, are saying, well,
there's plenty of places they
can go, which I'll show you right here.
But the reality is Alma Wasi, for example, as I keep saying,
has been, we, we discussed this months ago,
they've been bombing there.
So this is a game
that the media willfully ignores how that's happening.
Here's what Elon Levy says.
Well, first of a Dr uh, I always do that.
Jeremy Corbin says,
the assault on Rafa is another utterly despicable war crime.
As bombs reign down on a trapped
and terrified population, we implore our government
to find an ounce of humanity
and end its complicity in this senseless massacre.
Wake up. This is not a war, it's a genocide.
And don't forget, this is the guy that they, you know,
was caught up in being called
and Andy mite for the same dumb
reason other people have in the past.
Not to say that there aren't those existing
racist doesn't exist.
That's a stupid thing as well. But he was never doing that.
It was because he was pointing out uncomfortable truths
for the empire and they use that against him.
The point though is Elon says, you can't say they're trapped
and condemn Israel for trying to move them.
Just these lazy, clumsy arguments.
How in the world can you not?
Just because they're moving them into a dangerous place
does not mean they're helping them.
You're just, I mean, again, this person is so bad at this
and yet he, he's the best they got.
It seems as a soft MD says they are trapped,
surrounded on all sides by the
EIDF, which we just proved to you.
You're a liar, Elon.
You're a liar and a disgusting war criminal.
A hundred percent. Lastly, here's
what Caitlyn Johnstone wrote.
I think this is important. I don't oppose the butchery in
Gaza because I love Hamas or hate Jews or love Islam
or hate America, which is basically the things
that they're the two party illusion jams things into.
She says, I don't oppose the butchery in Gaza
because I'm a lefty or a Kami or an anarchist
or an anti-imperialist.
I, I oppose the butchery in Gaza
because I'm not an effing psychopath
opposing Israel's butchery
and Gaza is so obvious, so common sense,
such a bare minimum fundamental level being human 1 0 1
position, that if it isn't immediately self-evident to you
after learning the basic facts, your problem is much,
much deeper than whatever ideology or bias
or prejudice you might happen to have.
There's something wrong with you as a person.
If you support Israel's butchery
and Gaza, you've got much bigger problems than merely not
having the correct ist or ism belief system.
You're just all effed up inside
your conditioning has made you into such a generally
S-H-I-T-T-Y human being.
You have deep and immensely cons, cons, uh, cons,
consequential flaws in your character,
and you won't mature as a person
until you heal and transcend them.
Opposing Israel's atrocities
and Gaza doesn't make you a good person.
It just makes you a normal person.
And supporting Israel's atrocities in Gaza
makes you a bad person.
Nobody gets any points for opposing an active genocide.
That's just the basic bare minimum requirement
for a normal human being
with a functioning empathy center in their brain.
If you can't meet that basic, bare minimum standard,
you deserve to be viewed as with suspicion and disdain.
And anyone in your personal life who cares about truth,
morality, and humanity
should seriously reassess their relationship with you.
I just, it's, you know, and this, this isn't about
political differences, guys,
that I'm not even getting into the political day.
This is about the murder of innocent people on any side.
The idea that anybody should support
what happened on October 7th or support,
and I'm not talking about the active resistance.
I'm talking about the crimes that were committed, whether
by a DF or God or uh, Hamas
or the ongoing seven months of genocide sense
or any number of other examples around the world.
It's just about basic human decency
and the crimes that we can see
and how they pit us against ourselves using the screamers in
the two party illusion who don't care about the things
that we, they pretend to care about.
It's a trap and we've been lost in it far too long.
And I'm just hoping some
of this stuff can just shake the hell out of what needs
to be shaken so we can see it, so we can stop it.
Thank you for tuning in today. I know this stuff is hard.
I know some of this can be really emotional,
but I know you see it.
I know you feel it
and it's just time to do something about it.
This cannot continue.
We can't fall back into these traps and cycles
and wait for this to start up again.
And I asked somebody to point out in the chat, by the way,
which we've already highlighted,
what's going on in Congo should be highlighted,
what's going on in Myanmar,
what's going on in many locations that the US government
and Israel we can prove are involved in?
That's not just because I'm trying to overlap these things.
It's because it's the truth.
And you could see it the, the, the diamond industry,
the whole overlap of what Israel controls there
and maintains what we're dealing with.
And there's a huge part of why
that is allowing what's going on in the Congo.
And it's overwhelming the central line you can see.
And it's not just one government,
one religion, or one ethnicity.
It's clearly people
who don't care about humanity at the expense of
for their interests at the expense of everything.
I know we see it. Help us stop it. Thank you for tuning in.
I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.