- Always like, oh, but Israel is surrounded on
all sides by enemies.
And it's like, do you know
who else was surrounded on all sides by enemies?
These guys? Yeah.
It turns out when your state is, uh, founded
by genocidal ethno nationalists stealing land
that isn't theirs, uh, your neighbors tend
to not like you very much.
Shocking. Like Zionists always try
to frame the central conflict in the Middle East as, oh,
these Arab states refuse to recognize Israel's right
to exist, which is like technically accurate,
just like it's technically accurate
to frame the central conflict of World War ii,
as the Allied Nations refuse
to recognize the third Rex right to exist in both cases
for very good reason, because both the Third Reich
and Israel were founded
by genocidal ethno nationalists stealing land
that wasn't theirs because they felt they had an ancestral
historical claim to it.
Oh, but the Arab states are the ones
that declared war on Israel.
So technically they started the conflict.
France and the UK are the ones that declared war on Germany.
So by your logic, Hitler's the victim, which is logic
that only makes sense if you frame violently stealing
people's land as a neutral action
that everyone else should be fine with.
Oh, but the Levant used to be part of the Kingdom of Israel,
and Czechoslovakia used to be part of the Holy Roman empire.
I guess that gives Hitler a free pass.
- Welcome to the daily wrap up, A concise show dedicated
to bringing you the most relevant independent news
as we see it from the last 24 hours
Monday, May 6th, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Likely gonna be the very last time
you see me in this setting.
Uh, it may be very similar,
but this is the last time you'll probably see me here.
If you're on the YouTube stream,
why just actually mean that?
But in general, if you're on the W YouTube stream,
it's probably just about to get started.
I forgot to change over the thread,
so it'll be starting for you right now.
Now I've got very limited time today,
and genuinely not whether I end up trying to go long or not.
Uh, and literally have about an hour
and a half, if not less, for multiple reasons.
So we will see if we get to everything
that I have lined up today.
What I have in the title in general,
we're gonna make sure we cover,
but there's quite a lot to talk about as, as always,
but important developments in regard
to obviously the ceasefire conversation,
the illusion therein, the Rafa invasion, the beginning
of it, or at least the statement they're in,
where there's a lot to talk about around developments
around the Israeli perspective of these conversations.
As I keep trying to show people really powerful statements
coming from writers from 9 7 2 magazine showing you people
on the ground saying, if Israel does not accept Hamas' deal,
Israel will burn.
These are Israeli Jews protesting Israel's government,
and yet we are being called racist in the United States
for highlighting that Israel should be accepting the deal
as opposed to continuing their genocidal efforts in Gaza
that's threatening the lives of the hostages
that they claim they're trying to rescue.
It's ridiculous, and it has been from the very beginning,
regardless of whether you think they're right
or wrong in regard to what's going on in the general sense,
what's happening here is obviously counter
to everybody's interest other than the Israeli government at
the expense of both the Gaza people, Palestinians
and the Israelis, which is just fascinating
to see how this is developed.
Now we're gonna talk about how that's gone forward,
how it seems the Rafa discussion,
as I was already feeling we talked about, is sort
of being used as this counterbalance to push back against
any deal that goes against their interest,
which is any deal at all it seems,
which is frustrating everybody,
including the Israeli population.
We're also gonna get into, um, some conversation around,
which one was it here?
Oh, as, as well as you know, there.
Well, I mean, actually, I'm gonna go
and pause there for obvious reasons for time,
but we wanted to talk a bit about the bombing
and the Kareem Shalom discussion around the illusion.
Israel's framing this clear attack
of a military buildup in regard to Rafa as some sort
of Hamas targeting of aid while they're being lied,
while they're lying yet again about the delivery of aid
that both ra as well as the United Nations
and specific rapporteurs have openly, publicly proven
and called out just in the last week about
how they're withholding aid, stopping aid from getting
through the same thing that's been going on the entire time.
Now, as they're beginning their buildup
for what's gonna happen in Rafa,
it seems either this was an attack that they manufactured,
or I mean, it seems that her Hamas has claimed this,
but even that, to me, I just don't know how to read
with all the different dynamics of Israel funding Hamas
and the cutter part versus the people in Gaza.
It's very confusing.
My point is that there do seem to be statements
of Hamas claiming something that happened there,
but on top of that, it's suiting Israel's interest to a t
and lying about what actually happened, which is the bombing
of a military buildup as opposed to the crossing location
of aid, by the way, aid
that they're also not letting through.
Anyway. So it's an interesting dynamic if we have to.
We'll get to that tomorrow. I'd like to start with a couple
of, well, first the shout out
of the clip that I played here.
Uh, here we go. This, this, uh, I've seen this guy,
I'm not familiar with his work necessarily,
but I've seen his clips floating around,
really doing a good job, calling out the contradictions,
the logical contradictions.
But his statements to are in no way are meant
to be taken despite the fact
that they already are in the comments to imply
that somehow Hitler was right or that that's the right side.
If you read it like that, it's the only way you can ignore
what he's highlighting, which is that Zionism is,
is in the same po.
Well, let's put it this way, that the logic that's used
to make it seem like they're not committing genocide could
be applied to the n the Nazi agenda in the every single way.
Doesn't mean they're even the same thing.
It just shows you that what's happening is a willful
disregard for the obvious reality in hopes
of a politically favorable presentation
that most powerful people in the world seem to be accepting,
despite the fact that their entire
population see right through this.
But check this out, it's a good clip.
Now, Wal, I wanna point
out a couple of quick things to start.
Jason did a great clip of our recent show around the, uh,
EPA ignorant ignoring PFAS forever chemicals
to such a strong degree that it's built up
so dangerously in human waste
because it's so extreme in our environment
and then in our bodies that even the waste
that's now being used to make fertilizer,
which is its own conversation using human waste
to make fertilizer in some kind of environmental process,
is translating to dangerous levels
of PFAS in the environment that's used in,
and even translating to 10 to
neighboring farms of places using that.
Imagine that extreme stretch.
It's so dangerous in your body
that your waste even then used it to process, becomes
so dangerous that it then gets translated
through the use into neighboring farms,
and I just talked about this, has killed cattle, sheep, uh,
uh, horses, chickens per an investigation by,
by legitimate investigators on the ground.
That's been all documented.
You can prove for yourself it's even going
through more litigation at this point.
And the crazy part of this is that it's obvious,
it's been around for such a long time.
We've been screaming about PFAS, about forever chemicals,
about the products they're used in.
And EPAs argument is, well,
there's pfas all over the place in normal
things like sunscreen and toys.
So it's just everybody consumes it,
therefore, that's why it's there.
And they say, well, it meets
regulations so everything's okay.
So we're just gonna ignore the fact that people are dying,
animals are dying and things are dangerous,
and we can test this stuff in our bodies,
even though we know it's dangerous.
And the EPAs acknowledge
that it's dangerous, but yeah, it's everywhere.
So, oh, well, that's actually what we're being told.
It's absolutely mind blowing.
Now, I'm not gonna say that I know for sure
that every single person at the APA is
compromised or any, or all of them.
Maybe it's just such a defunct organization with
so few people to do any good manufactured that way,
that it's never going to allow change.
And maybe they're trying, I don't know.
It doesn't seem that way. I only say that to be objective
because I don't know their intentions.
I know that there's very clear governmental processes
that are used to hamstring things
that might actually cause change.
However, is it's happening.
This is being allowed, it's mind blowing to me.
So make sure you check this out.
On top of that, I just wanted to highlight another Post
Organic Consumers Association ban, the Highly Toxic manmade,
uh, its, uh, fluorinated Chemicals, PFAS
or Forever Chemicals.
And just as a good article from May 1st showing you how
ubiquitous this is everywhere
and that they've known about it, then people have been
telling 'em about it forever, and
that they've been ignoring it
and sidestepping it
until only just recently going, oh yeah, that's right.
It can lower fertility and wind by 40%.
That was a recent post by, uh, uh, uh,
this last time it was Wake Up Today or Am Today
or whatever that platform is today.com corporate media,
and yet it still continues.
Now, on another side note,
glyphosate shouldn't be a side note, in fact,
but we've been screaming about this for a decade or more.
Here's a new peer-reviewed study,
2024 glyphosate presence in human sperm.
You know how I've been keep telling people
that every time it seems like it, at least somebody
that kind of sneers it off and goes, you're being hyperbolic
or you're being a conspiracy theorist.
When I say it's literally everywhere, it's in the air,
you're breathing, it's in the clothes you're wearing,
it's in the food is everywhere.
Studies have confirmed this every which way.
As I talk about the, the, you know, UK did a piss test
for parliament and every single one
of them had it in their urine, or it's in the
cottons, they're used to make the clothes.
So it's everywhere. It's in everything you,
this planet has been drenched, and that's not
because of some one single bad Monsanto company.
It's a huge part of it. It's
because the government that allowed this to be the reality
through compromising situations or whatever else,
but this one shows you it's in your sperm first report
to positive correlation
with oxidative stress in an infertile French population.
It's just nonstop.
If they cared, this would've stopped a long time ago
because there's a lot of people that have been, you know,
like hair on fire screaming about
this because it's important.
But here we are now also include the great interview I had
with Stephanie Eff PhD
and Danny Rancourt PhD about glyphosate mRNA
and spike proteins
and how they work in a synergistic
fashion to destroy your health.
I guess that's just one of those crazy coincidences
that end up working exactly the way it would if you tried
to make this a weapon and dangerous.
But, you know, coincidence as well as a great clip that I,
we just put out on Substack, another one coming tomorrow in
regard to the outstanding RNA burkhart interview, never
before seen abnormal blood clots in COVID-19 vaccinated
patients written by Taylor Hudak as the interviewee
as well, interviewer as well.
She also wrote the breakdown of this,
which is very important.
Now, what she's highlighting here is both just the general
concept of never before seen abnormal clots,
but also that this work he's showing
has yet to be made public.
Not to say that these are, you know, there's been a lot
of coverage of abnormal clots, so that's made clear,
but this is actually a really important discussion as well
as to remember, again, that just to pointing,
pointing this out the other day, there's
so many people out there that are taking this work
and repackaging it and not including the source material.
I'm glad the clips get out.
But the point is, the problem is if somebody sees
that clip without any source material,
we all know how this works today.
People that don't want to see it will dismiss it.
Usually they will anyway.
But if there's somebody who just might be on the fence
and they're able to scroll down
and look at the, the full, you know,
the source material included in this link,
which is the last American vagabond
and the main site, you'll get to see all the source material
and then links to larger databases
and things that we've co compiled
to have all the source material to the actual
clinical work done by Arna Burkhart.
So you can prove the stuff of yourself as opposed
to just seeing somebody talking about it,
which gives the ability to just go, I'm not going
to look at it now.
That there, at least one that I saw with it was like the,
the Sergeant Network or whatever on Twitter just took the
clip, posted their own logo on it,
even though there was a clip that Taylor made.
Like everybody needs to call stuff like that out.
Also, yes, for credit, but
because people like that are grifters
or bottom feeders that are scrubbing other people's work,
using it to claim anything
without including the source material.
And that has to be important to us.
We have to make sure we let people
prove these things to themselves.
Otherwise we end up in a circular motion,
just like on Twitter, where we're all high fiving about
things we know and ignoring things we don't wanna see.
That's what they're trying to create.
It's absolutely monumentally important.
Now, two more points. I just discussed this with Zoe Smith,
uh, the, the, uh, whistleblower medical coder who wrote, uh,
the, actually I should have grabbed that.
Let's see if it pops up. Hold on. There it is. Perfect.
She wrote this amazing substack post for our substack, um,
and this it is, oh wait, this is actually the one
that is, let's see.
Oh, it is on. Okay, so yeah, my,
my Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult by Zoe Smith,
and it's, it's fascinating.
It's terrifying. We had a great interview today
that I'm most likely putting out tomorrow,
and that's in regard to some important things that she saw
as she puts it as sort of as the medical coder, having sort
of the sim city view
of all the different agencies submitting their coding
around all the actions and all the testing
and all the things they're doing, being able to see
that there wasn't a rise in the things they said there were
in the beginning, and it only coincided
with the PCR tests and the injections.
And it's fascinating.
It's an important discussion as well as just
to include the fact that they're hyping
and that we should not be falling into whether
it's bird flu or anything else.
Two new covid. Here's the
actual website I was talking about.
What is this us, not us. What is this today, America today?
I forget what the hell is that called again?
But two new covid variants called apparently flirt
Ridiculous are spreading in the us What are the, who cares?
I really honestly don't care at this point.
What, what this do they do this with every new flu variant.
Now that we know, as a matter of fact,
'cause of peer reviewed science, that this was never worse
than the flu according to the IUs group
and the leading science on the topic, proving
that this is less than the flu for the, for, what was it,
90% or 80% of the entire age group population
that's peer reviewed science.
The point is, what's the issue with the new,
if there's a new thing floating around, if it's even real,
first of all, it sh I right now, there's no reason to think
that we should be any more concerned about anything else
that's ever happened, and they're gonna be
hyping this to push new things.
Ask yourself whether it could be,
I'm not saying don't take precautions, wash your hands.
Do you know what you would normally do to stay safe?
This is meant to push people into another state
of fear as always.
And maybe it's the beginning of something new
like another covid push.
I don't know. I'm not gonna lean into that
until I see that happening.
I see a lot of independent media that sort
of do that hype for them.
And I understand even with good intentions
trying to go, oh, get ahead of it.
This might be the new thing. But I'm worried about
doing that for them right now.
Sort of like with the Rafa conversation in another angle.
But just heads up, this is being pushed, begins to build.
We'll be on it. Now, let's start with a conversation
around censorship,
but as it pertains to the Israel conversation, I want you
to see this, 'cause this is actually really important in
regard to the whole narrative partisan push
that we see in every single topic.
The last American vagabond was just censored on TikTok.
I mean, like literally, not just censored,
just deleted no notification, no email, which whatever,
we're censored from everywhere all the time.
Like I literally do not know anybody
and Alex Jones included, who has been censored
and in, in as many ways as we have.
And I mean, to this moment, not where we get let back.
I mean, Twitter's the only place we've ever been let back on
every single other platform that you can name,
in my opinion, other than the independent ones
that are not censoring mostly anyway, you know what I mean
by some of them that I'm worried about?
We have been censored and we still continue to be
TikTok Instagram.
I mean all of them guys. It's wild.
Now, my point is, this just happened.
Jason was about to post a new clip
for us, and it's just gone.
Couldn't find this about half an hour ago when I had it up.
It was still sort of flickering with gray in it.
You could see gray outlets, but you couldn't see anything.
Now it's just gone. And you can see clearly this is TikTok,
the last American vagabond.
Let's refresh and just in case, oh,
see it flickered for a second, but it's gone.
View profile. See what happens there.
Gone. Okay, so here's the interesting point.
What are we being told about TikTok right now?
That TikTok is a, I mean, I guess Chinese run
or whatever the narrative is, Singaporean, CEO,
but whatever the point is, oh, and again, us backing,
but we're pretend it's only China
'cause that's what partisan Banon tells you.
But the point is
that we're told this is a wildly anti-Israel,
manipulative Muslim run, whatever the narratives are,
they're all over the map, but ultimately converges
with the idea that they're promoting Israeli nar,
anti-Israeli narratives, which are anti-Semitic in order
to manipulate the conversation.
So if I'm the one, I mean, how does that make sense here?
Exactly. Explain to me why, if this isn't, aren't we doing,
isn't that what, at least they're claiming we're doing a
bunch of antisemitic pro negative Israel conversation.
No, we're just breaking down the truth
for you in an open-minded objective way that's fighting
for anybody oppressed, whether they be Jew or Muslim
or Christian or anything.
But what they want you to think is we're doing that,
but here we are in TikTok and we're censored for doing that.
So at the very least, that doesn't really add up, does it?
And this is what gets hilarious for me, is that
what we're really seeing today,
which I can prove in every one of these platforms, is
that there's a clear direct censorship around things
that are highlighting these problems, even on TikTok.
Now, yes, there's a lot of people out there
that are on TikTok saying all these things
every time I've said this before,
and I'm not certain that this is why it's
happening, of course I couldn't be.
But what I keep highlighting is that the one,
the real censorship is around people
that challenge the establishment and prove it.
Just like we talk about with AstraZeneca or myocarditis
or blood clots that Whitney and I got censored on Patreon
near at the same week.
It was the same week near the same moment. Why?
Because we proved it.
And they even said that in their documentation,
you're allowed to talk about this stuff,
you just can't spread misinformation.
So the point was, well, it became misinformation when we
used the source material that showed that it was happening,
we now know that was the truth.
It's happened. They proved it, even in regard
to AstraZeneca, that was recent.
So here we are again.
And I think this is because we're not just going Israel bad,
and this is the history which they can then go, yeah,
dangerous anti-Semitic, but they let it stay there.
It's because we're going here is the provable,
documented truth about this discussion,
which is usually somewhere in the middle.
That's what I think you guys can decide for yourselves.
I think that's hilarious.
Now, on the note of TikTok here, Ryan Grim posted this,
a co-sponsor of the TikTok ban said in a closed door meeting
that Congress moved to ban the app
because quote, you're seeing
how these kids are being manipulated
to oppose Israel's war effort.
That's what they're actually saying.
And they obtained the audio.
You can, you can listen to it right here.
The point is, they're not talking about it
because of misinformation or antisemitic,
or they, they're saying it's because it's hurting
the interests of Israel.
And if you don't think that, here's a
clip of them talking about it.
This is our arbitrary writing, incredible mask off moment.
Romney and Blinken say that the ban of TikTok was directly
because, quote, the emotion, the impact
of images has a very challenging effort on the narrative.
These are weird accidental words, ladies and gentlemen.
And it says, the narrative being is real's pr.
I mean, even if you want to pretend it's something else,
the images not fake stuff,
but the images which we can prove are real.
They admit it, they're real,
are challenging for the narrative.
That's the reality.
- Well, I know that's not your area of expertise,
but you have to, um, um, uh, uh, have some thoughts on that,
which is, I mean, as you've said,
why has Hamas disappeared in terms of public perception?
A an offer is on the table to have a ceasefire,
and yet the world is screaming about Israel.
It's like, why aren't that screaming about Hamas?
- Well, we'll get to that. Exactly. Proven exactly.
Yet again today, they're either too ignorant to no,
or they're willfully lying to you about it.
The fact that Israel is routinely disregarding
what everybody else wants, including their own people,
in specifically about the ceasefire
conversation. But everything else as well,
- Except the ceasefire.
Bring home the, the hostages that said,
it's all the other way around.
- No, they've refused the deal four or five times.
Now, whether they like the deal
or not, that would have brought their people home.
They know that. He knows that he's lying to you. Uh,
- I, I I, I've, I mean,
typically the Israelis are good at pr.
What's happened here? How have they, how have they,
and we been so ineffective at communicating, um, uh,
the, the, uh, realities there.
And our, you're on, uh, an intravenous feed of information,
uh, with, um, new impulses, inputs every millisecond.
And of course, the way this has played out on social media
has dominated the, uh, the narrative.
Mm-hmm, and you,
- Yeah, by, by the way, interest of time.
I'm gonna leave it there. Make
sure you watch this for yourself.
Today's gonna be less video content
and just trying to go through the information
for you guys to check out for time.
Now, here's what Ryan Grim says about the same clip,
incredible historical document here.
Blinken says, Israel's PR is failing
because social media allows people a direct look at what's
happening, shor of the ability to mediate it,
and it lands with emotional res resonance.
Romney then says, that's why we moved to ban TikTok.
You just can't make it up.
They're, they're, they're straight up on the surface
admitting, and I don't even think they're truly
that self-aware to recognize
what they're saying and how it means.
What it means here is an interesting point.
American Jewish billionaire, Alex Karp is using spyware
to intercept phone calls from international
citizens to Palestinians.
His company Palantir, is selling this information
to the unit 80, unit 8,200 in the IDF so
that they can target civilians in Gaza.
I mean, we're, I'm planning on having a conversation
with Whitney about this overlap.
Palantir, it's very interesting.
We've talked about it a lot, but more into the current
perspective of this with the artificial intelligence
and all that we've talked about.
But my God, if we're talking about this overlap
with very clear, high level like supernational entities
that are using their powers to allow them to do
what we all see them doing, this is not some unique thing
that can be shoved away on one person like Netanyahu as much
as they really want that to be the case.
Now in regard to Al Jazeera, which is all this is,
whether it's TikTok
or whatever else, it's obvious
that in some ways they're trying
to hide what is being shown.
And here is un Human Rights Watch saying we regret cabinet
decisions of Israel to close the Al Jazeera in Israel.
Which, you know, they all scream about
how fresh press freedom and Iran
and how they're removing this and China, Russia doing that.
And then we shut, they shut down countless examples,
but it's all because, well, they're bad guy.
Oh, simple enough. Our I said so bad guy.
So we'll just ignore all the things we said.
Like the rules based international order ploy is, it's,
it's crumbled six months ago.
It's so embarrassingly obvious
that at the very least they don't care about anything they
claim they're fighting for when it
comes to their own actions.
That's clear that cat is outta the bag and it says they free
and independent media is essential, says the UN
to ensuring transparency and accountability.
I'm not even saying they agree with that,
but they're sure stating it sure makes 'em look good.
Maybe they mean it now even more are
so given tight restrictions on reporting from Gaza.
Freedom of expression is a key human right.
We urge government to overturn the ban, which they won't,
they, you know, and you know why it's obvious
as the Saul Rod points out,
this is why Israel shutting down JA zero.
They don't want us to see what they're doing in Rafa,
the last refuge of Palestinians
and Gaza, this is from yesterday overnight,
Rafa Israel strikes target targeted 11 homes,
not Hamas locations, not un buildings, not hospitals
or churches, but 11 homes, 21 bodies have been recovered.
Now this is being cited and discussed by UN entities.
The all you're gonna get is people like Matt Miller acting
like he's not sure investigations will go on
and then never talking about it again.
And people like Israel's lackey screaming about
how you're all racist, otherwise we know what's going on
and everyone else can see it in the world.
They're murdering families in the location.
They claim that they're about to invade.
They've been bombing them for months now.
And that's why, because Al Jazeera highlights these things,
whether or not you think they're honest, whether
or not they lie, every other point that it, it's,
the point is we know that this is the
accuracy accurate reality.
Here's a clip that I planned
and I have planned for a long time, this one
and a couple others to go over when there's a day when
there's not much else happening,
which it never seems to happen.
But this is a 16 minute video,
which I highly recommend you watch in
full from double down news.
It says what really happened on October 7th
by Richard Sanders and this is an Al Jazeera investigation.
Now he just wanna play you the opening clip.
And this is something you really need to watch the entirety
because the truth is shockingly obvious
- Zero's investigative unit.
We've conducted a forensic meticulous examination
of the events of October the seventh.
We uncovered very real crimes committed by Hamas and others.
But I think what was perhaps most significant were the
crimes we discovered that did not happen.
And it's hugely concerning
that these revelations have been virtually entirely
ignored by the Western press.
What's extraordinary is the Israelis were
aware of the plans.
Hamas were actually training quite openly for this operation
and they were actually placing the training videos online
so anyone could view them on the very night,
- Which makes me truly question when,
especially when we understand the proof, the proof
and open statements by Netanyahu
and his own, the coup meeting in 2019
that they were funding Hamas in order to divide Palestine
with the, or Gaza with the West Bank.
And so that has to make you at least ask whether there was
a, some kind of a coordination there,
which would change the whole perception on whether
Hamas is fighting for one.
I mean, I think it's multifaceted.
I think there's a lot going on here.
It's never as simple as one side or the other.
It's all, there's always more vying agendas.
But just all I'm saying is consider that possibility
- Of October the seventh
before Dawn spotters along the fence are reporting back
to headquarters and the head of Mbet
and the head of military intelligence
take this seriously enough.
Then in the middle of the night, they're up
and talking to each other and they conclude.
It's just another training exercise.
And what is extraordinary is
that they don't even raise the alert level to number one,
a hit by Apache helicopter unarmed civilians as well.
The Israelis were then extraordinarily slow to respond.
Now they scramble Apache helicopters,
but there's no ground control.
It's pretty clear that in the chaos,
some hostages at least were hit
by Apache Helicopter fire. We've
- Now, I'll leave it there.
Make sure you watch this.
Here's just what he quoted from it.
The kibbutz is were I, we've identified 18 people
who were pretty much certainly killed by the police.
That's not even debatable anymore.
Hartz and Mon Weiss and 9 7 2,
and I mean countless gray zone have covered this
explicitly showing you that this is the reality.
Their own people, helicopter pilots, tank drivers, the,
the head, the head security of kibbutz told publicly
that he saw them kill their own people.
They bombed the cars as they left.
And they've openly said that they shot.
I mean it's, oh, it's shocking
that we can't have a public conversation about this.
It says kill everyone then allow people to be captured.
I mean these are statements made by the IDF.
Make sure you watch this.
Now in that same point, the lies,
they just keep spreading no matter what.
People like Elon Levy where he says, we vowed never again.
I guess that only applies in one direction, right?
But then last time Antisemites incinerated Jews was seven
months ago and just shows an oven, I guess,
which has no bearing.
That oven is not in Gaza. It's just a random picture.
If you search it on, it's just from
something completely different.
'cause that's how they roll, you know?
But the point is, and this is never again is now, I guess,
but except in regard to Gaza.
'cause most of the Jews protesting this,
especially in the protests out there in campuses,
which are in most cases funded by Jewish organizations
that left half them, there are Jewish
with Holocaust survivors
and they make it out to be a bunch of Jew hatred.
'cause that's how maniac , how lost they are.
But the point is that they're the ones telling you never
again means for anybody, not just Jews.
And they're watching it happen to people in Palestine.
Now the point though, incinerated Jews,
you know what that's referring to?
The lie that they were burned,
which did not happen according to Harts, which I'll include
that link for you, which you can read for yourself.
He knows it's there. He just hopes you don't know about it
or don't care and just listen to him
or blindly regurgitate his lies.
This is the Harts. If it'll finally translate, there we go.
That this simply pointing out that the,
that not all these things happen in reality
and they get into the baby in an oven, they get into the,
the stomach coat open, the burning alive, the beheading
of children, none of it.
And they'll tell you in the article, did not happen lies.
And here he is lying for it again
because he wants you on this holocaust remembrance day
to fall back into the idea
that this is happening all over again.
But here, captain Grove highlights the reality.
And in this video we just pointed to,
they discuss the same thing, the lies.
And here's just a couple of other points you'll make.
Paradigm shift says, never forget
how a moss burned all those babies.
And the high highlights the video of the, what's his name,
Eli Beer, who Ray zones broken down aggress.
A lot of people have highlighted how dishonest this person
is saying a woman has had her baby cut outta her stomach.
Nope. Provable lie. Everybody has admitted that's a lie.
And they still keep pushing that narrative.
And I mean people in the IDF Harts leaning
people in the conversation.
And the point is that these are the people they're citing to
and they talk about burning people alive or simple reality.
Are you talking about when the IDF shot Israelis
with Apache helicopters and tank shells, the only munitions
that were there capable of doing that.
But nobody cares in that conversation that wants
to hide the, the reality
because it works
to make the lies sound like we're doing it all over again.
Back to Holocaust, back to
that's the only argument they have.
Now, of course, if it wasn't approval reality,
we would be the bottom line is
that they go into the hypothetical, the evidence is there.
They're lying. They know they're lying.
And yet they keep pushing this.
That's insulting to Jews,
that's insulting to Holocaust survivors.
It's insulting to anybody but Zionists, they don't care.
Now, in regard to the threats, this is actually crazy to me
that they're willing to do this yet again in regard
to the international criminal court, not the inter,
not the world court, the inter court of justice.
This is the ICC who is pretty commonly un
compromised in my opinion.
And this is not a po this is not a unique opinion.
They've shown themselves to be pretty meek when it comes
to finally, you know, going the full nine yards.
So now seeing as how they seem to be stepping further,
investigating, asking questions, Netanyahu
and his own government, I, it's been reported even
by their own people, that they're pretty terrified of this.
Hart said the same, now you've got him pulling all the
strings, pulling all those pocket strings tied right
to Mike Pompeo and everybody else.
They jump up and go, how dare you. We'll come after you.
Don't forget, this is not new.
Mike Pompeo says the ICC joins forces with Hamas.
Or if they do, that's how he's framing this
right outta the talking points.
So now the ICC is Hamas, if they just do their job,
doesn't this seem stupid?
Yes. And this is why most people are seeing through this.
It should, it's, he's saying it should face the full weight
of US sanctions again showing you.
So he's saying, if you do your
job, we're gonna break the law.
'cause that's what that means. Us unilateral sanctions
is not how that's supposed to work.
It is in fact illegal when you break it down.
It's supposed to be international entities from some kind
of a un body discussing this
and handing down sanctions in a world sense.
Not individual nations handing out unilateral sanctions
as if they're the rulers of the world.
That's what they do. But
so do other countries too now because they do that.
But the US is the one that really started this momentum.
They're just gonna sanction
entities that don't do what they want.
Now, ask yourself how they're capable
of sanctioning an international body.
It's not a country, they're not really, the point is
that they have so much financial control
that they'll just do what they want to anyway,
if they join forces with Hamas by investigating Israel.
Because it's not like Israel's never committed a
crime anywhere else, ever.
Right? In no other context, context,
we're not talking about the crimes against
Libya, the crimes against Syria.
It's just they'll join in with Hamas if they do an
investigation that should make you disgusted.
That should make you feel, that should make you recognize
what these leaders in
gigantic air quotes actually care about.
Here's what they actually said.
Now this is a scoop apparently broke.
I'm not, I, me, Hassan is what Len Veritas says.
I've looked into that has just exposed a letter from US
Republican senators directly threatening the ICC.
You'll want to hear this, the quote you have been warned,
target Israel and we will target you.
That's a threat. There's no way around it.
And let's not forget as I'll actually show you first 2018,
John Bolton threatens the ICC was sanctioned,
that they dare investigate the US or Israeli war crimes.
Now if you actually read what he said, it's, I mean, well,
and this is just one of the quotes, if the court comes
after us, Israel or our allies, we will not sit quietly.
The point is he go when he in his many different back
and forths, he openly implies he
will go after their families.
That's a terrifying reality.
Pompeo has done the same and he's doing it again.
Now, here's what the letter says, signed
by all the usual suspects, Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz,
Marco Rubio, mark Rub, Marco Rubio, Rick Scott.
Ridiculous. Here's what it says.
And this is actually pretty wild Dear Mr. Kahan of the ICC.
We write regarding the reports
that the ICC may be considering issuing international arrest
warrants against Netanyahu and other Israeli officials.
Such actions are illegitimate and lack legal basis.
And if carried out, will result in severe sanctions against
you and your institution.
You realize they're investigating four war crimes,
not even necessarily to the, to the, the point of genocide,
even though the World Court has said that there is merit
for the investigation of genocide.
And so they're just investigating for crimes.
You realize how many crimes have been proven,
how many human rights groups have highlighted the murdering
of children, the raping of families
or the pillaging of families, the raping of individuals,
the destruction of land, the destruction of farmland.
I mean, and I'm, I mean guys just as October 7th,
but going back 75 years
and they're gonna threaten them for,
for even investigating this.
I just don't know how anybody
doesn't see the truth behind that.
Even if you stand with Israel, the US government stepping in
to do this should be chilling.
It says the ICC is attempting to punish Israel
for taking legitimate actions of self-defense.
Seven months by, by the way, so seven months
after October 7th that we're still calling this self-defense
against their Iranian backed aggressors.
These people are children.
In fact, in your own words, it says you witnessed quote
scenes of calculated cruelty conducted
by Hamas in Israel following October 7th.
That's somehow dis like you can only hold one
thought in your mind at one time.
Like let's just say you believe everything they said
about Hamas on October 7th.
That does not change the provable crimes
of collective punishment, starvation,
everything they've done.
But that's how they want you to read it.
It's all okay because they started it like we're in
kindergarten or the fact that let's not,
let's pretend like we don't know that Israel funded Hamas.
And so they're at least in some way culpable.
And it's far more than that for what happened
or the fact that they saw it coming and didn't do anything.
But let's pr, let's pretend that doesn't exist
because people like Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz
and Rubio are per, are willfully blind
to anything about ha any
that makes Israel look like the aggressor.
It says these arrest warrants would align the ICC
with the largest state sponsor of terrorism
and its proxy again.
So by arresting an Israeli entity for crimes,
it aligns you with their enemies.
This is the most childish logic.
So it, this is, this is the same as saying that believing
what Russia says about our elections, even though it's true
is wrong because it helps Russia.
No, it's the truth. So believing it is the truth.
It doesn't matter who else it helps.
You're just trying to hide the truth.
So by doing this, you're simply aligning them by default
with the person fighting Israel
because you don't like what they're showing.
That's not how that works.
They're not standing up and going, I'm joining Hamas
because we're investigating Israel.
It doesn't matter who they were fighting.
They're committing crimes. So it
deserves to be investigated.
This, these are the leaders
of the so-called free world guys.
That's what these are people standing up for your democracy
as they shout down anything that goes against their agenda.
It says to be clear, there is no moral equivalence
between Hamas' terrorism
and Israel's justified response kicks a special kind
of stupid to make those kind of statements right now when
the world and they know it sees it.
The ICC is also prohibited
by its charter from proceeding in any case,
unless the relevant government is unwilling
or unable to police themselves.
And this is how they use this to manipulate the people
that don't know that Palestine is in fact a part of this.
Yes, Israel and the United States are not,
which should tell you something.
They use this as a mechanism against anybody else,
but they themselves are not a part of it.
So they act like they're somehow independent of it.
Palestine is, and all this time they try to act like, well,
Hamas was voted in Hamas is their government,
okay then they are their own place,
which means they have the right to work with the ICC,
which means they have the right
to bring in this investigation.
They're terrified of that.
It says you yourself have said Israel has trained lawyers
who advise commanders in a robust system intended
to ensure compliance with international law.
Ridiculous. It says by issuing warrants.
You would be calling into question the
legitimacy of Israel's laws.
No, they know damn well we're talking about Palestine.
But it says issuing arrest warrants for the leaders
of Israel would not only be unjustified,
it would expose your organization's
hypocrisy in double standards.
, yeah. Kettle black right there.
Cook kettle pot black or pot calling the kettle black.
Your office has not issued arrest warrants
for Iran supreme leader or any Iranian official.
Okay? Much that's interesting. Syrian President Assad.
Okay, Haas leaders. Okay, so what's their argument here?
So their argument is, because we said they're bad guy,
you're supposed to arrest them, not evidence aside.
So that what they're saying is you
didn't do it when we wanted you to.
So you're just doing it because they want you.
No, that's not what's happening.
They're investigating this
because there is so much evidence that they can't not,
I still don't think it's gonna come to pass.
But realize how obvious that is.
The, I mean, again, the world court, everybody,
human rights groups, United Nations,
I mean this has been a waterfall of evidence.
They've stayed, they've stood up
and screamed what they're doing themselves
and all they do is go, you haven't arrested Iran's
leader for what?
Because you guys claim he did something that you can't prove
that I can prove you're lying about.
It's children. We're dealing with guys children with a lot
of overwhelming power.
It's terrifying. It says,
nor have you issued an arrest warrant for it, China
Xi Jinping or Chinese officials for what?
I'm not saying they're not committing crimes.
I can guarantee you they're committing crimes.
Can we prove these things?
Are you even alluding to a crime
or are you just going they're, we don't like them.
You should be going after them instead stomping your feet.
Finally, neither is Israel nor the United States
or members of the ICC.
There's the other point I was saying, it's kind
of the one they're making right here and there and are
therefore outside of your
organization supposed jurisdiction.
Again, guys, they're very aware of the nuance here
that Palestine is and they're the ones calling on the ICC.
It says, if you were a, if you issue a warrant
for the arrest of the Israeli leadership,
we will interpret this.
This is the threat not only as a threat
to Israel's sovereignty, right,
but who cares about Palestine
but to the sovereignty of the United States.
Yeah, exactly. Like we're telling you,
they see it as the same.
So there, so who cares if that puts Americans at risks
or in general, but if, if you do this, we will take that
as attack on our sovereign.
It's not, Israel is not the United States attacks on Israel
sovereignty are not attacks on American sovereignty.
But that's what your supposed leaders,
your rulers are telling you.
You know why? Because they're compromised.
Because they're acting in the interest
of another country at the expense of Americans.
Now it says our country demonstrated in the American service
members protection act, the lengths to which we will go
to protect that sovereignty.
Read Israel. That's what they're saying right there.
So there's how many times I've told you the American
legislation go just even, I mean it's more now than ever.
But if you go through in the doc
and just look at any current
or pending it's any moment I've looked at half
of them involve Israel, random things that have nothing
to do with this, somehow have
shoehorned in interest of Israel.
There's a reason for that.
APAC is an obvious point, but much, much more than that.
And they're literally telling you, here's an act we did
that shows you what we'll do if you attack Israel at
the expense of Americans.
The United States it says will not tolerate
politicized attacks.
Not because we can prove their crimes
and that they're standing up and gleefully showing you their
crimes and then taunting you to do something about it.
Not that, but because we just wanna go after them
because it's politics.
Imagine watching the mo biggest genocide
that most people alive today have ever seen.
And then calling it pol politics,
it says if you move forward
with the measures indicated in this report, we will move
to end all American support for the ICC, which
as far as I can tell doesn't exist.
They're not a party to it.
They attack it anytime it comes after them.
They've threatened their families.
So I'm pretty sure you don't support the ICC unless it goes
after the guys you don't like,
which shows you your hypocrisy.
But it goes and sanction your employees and associates.
How does that even remotely make sense?
That is the kind of that's, I mean
that's like a Lindsey Graham action.
What does the employee have to do with
what the ICC is doing that's going after?
That's like saying we're gonna attack your family.
That's like saying we're gonna censor your family's bank
accounts or, or financially censor
because you don't, we don't like what your website's doing.
That's what this is what the US government is.
Just understand that they are belligerent,
they are aggressive.
They do not care about the things
that they point at other people have to abide by.
We're gonna go after your individual employees
and associates and then they go bar you
and your families from the United States.
You have been warned if you've ever seen a better example
of an authoritarian government acting authoritarian
and I mean like aggressively showing you that they are not
what they ever pretended to be.
It's right in front of you. Meanwhile,
they're all screaming about a bunch
of ki college kids pushing
and showing what they're actually doing.
That's the biggest threat to this country.
Not the fact that these people aren't even fighting for you.
It's terrifying. Now again,
John Bolton had threatened their families
and threatened things in the past, like a lot of them have.
Well, let's go through a couple other posts since then.
2018, guess what ICC was investigating.
Israel went the same way.
Now, I don't know at this point whether this was them trying
again and getting shouted down, but they got attacked.
They got threatened. They got sanctioned.
And guess what happened? It didn't go anywhere.
Here it is in 2019 here can't be fixed.
Senior ICC judge quits.
Why in protest of the United States
and Turkey meddling in their affairs, most of which revolved
around Israel and their own crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.
But yeah, but you know, attack them
because they're looking at what we do that's wrong.
This is not what the moral entity does.
Here is 2019 the ICC again
to investigate Israeli government war crimes.
'cause they don't exist though, right?
And of course, again, they got threatened.
They got attacked, they got sanctioned,
they backed away every single time.
December, 2020 ICC dropping inquiry into British war crimes
in Iraq showing the failure
of the international legal system.
Why? Because they got threatened by the United States
and everybody else around it and they dropped the ball.
Again. That's how this works.
Here's 2021 Israel calls ICC antisemitic
for deciding it has jurisdiction over war crimes.
Yeah. You know, do you see what that says
for stating its mandate?
As long as it applies to Israel, you're a racist
Only when it applies to Israel.
So when they charge the United States
with crimes, are they anti-Christian?
It's a stupid argument.
They're looking at the crimes
of these entities and they're calling them racist.
Why? Because that's what they do.
Zionism uses the for threat of racism to hide its crimes
behind the Jewish population.
You know, here's 2021 ICC again
investigates Israeli war crimes.
But guess what? It went the same way.
So here talking about their, the US government statements
around all this, Lindsey Graham says, in regard to
Netanyahu, giving a speech around never again is now.
I mean, think about how insultingly stupid that is.
While you're committing
genocide, you're claiming never again.
That's just disgusting. And Lindsey Graham, Mr.
Belligerent pro-Israel, anti-American,
Lindsey Graham says, well said, Mr.
Prime Minister, I can assure you American people
and Congress will have your back.
Your fight is our fight again, either so shockingly unaware
and, and, and not, you know, just completely out of touch
with the American people or, or not caring
because that's not
what the vast majority of Americans think.
It's just not. Polls have shown that both sides
of the paradigm, it's not the reality.
They have their strong support,
but it is not even close
to the majority of Americans or the world.
They've lost it. Your fight is our fight. No, no, no.
Their fight is your fight.
Lindsey Graham, at the expense of Americans.
And we all see that now. It's coming out crazy.
It's very clear right now.
Here's what Kim Iverson said in regard to his, his post
where he goes, if this report is true,
it is beyond the pale.
And this was a, I forget which one this was. Hold on.
It was, oh yes. Okay, I'm glad it's right here.
At the same point I was gonna get to this is this.
See, I'm always ahead of myself,
us put a hold on ammunition shipments to Israel,
which I highly doubt actually.
Like I actually literally do not
believe that that's happening.
They're just, they're just no
longer doing it in a public way.
That'd be my personal opinion.
But at the very least, it's still important
that they publicly claim to do that.
'cause that is a big deal. And
Israel's gonna call them out for it anyway.
'cause that's what they do. They attack their allies when
they barely step outta line.
But he says, this report is, if, if this report is true,
how do you not know if it's true?
Aren't you in the government?
I mean, that's just him trying to water it down.
I think that's how childish people are.
He says, our best ally in the region
and one of our best allies in the world is responding to one
of the most vicious attacks against
Jewish people since the Holocaust.
It was not an attack on Jewish people. That is your game.
It was an attack on the occupier of Israel.
And yes, there were crimes committed,
but it was also a legal act of armed resistance around
that provably fourth Geneva convention occupied.
I am certain he says that the United States Congress is
fully on board for continuing to supply military assistance
to the Jewish state without conditions.
I can't believe they keep saying that.
So it, so if they murder
a bunch of children, it doesn't matter.
No conditions, we don't care.
You break the law, doesn't matter. No conditions.
You can do whatever you want with them.
You can bomb your own families. It doesn't matter.
No conditions go. That's what the words mean.
There is no alternative meaning to no conditions
as they fight for their survival.
Is that what's happening? No.
As they murder another group who fights for their survival,
Israel's destruction of Hamas is non-negotiable.
. Well, I don't think literally anybody other than
people fighting for the ceasefire
or even calling for you to stop going
after Hamas, then I'm sure plenty of them think that.
But that's nowhere in the conversation that I can see.
They're calling for ceasefire.
And you call that not going
after something that you're gonna go after either way.
And we all know it. Here's what, here's what Kim had said.
How is Israel our best ally? Exactly.
That's, I mean, just even on that one point gets
so many examples of how they've publicly made fun
of almost everything in this government,
publicly from numerous officials said, how easy it is
to manipulate the American government, how easy it is
to make them do what they want, how much,
how little they think of them, how much,
how little they think of Christians.
I mean, it's everywhere.
And yet Lindsey Graham, you know, grovel at the feet
of Israel, it's ridiculous.
I, I don't know how they don't see that,
but she says, have they ever sent troops
to any of our numerous wars?
No, but they did send orange juice during the Korean War.
Are they, are they, are they, are they largest?
Are they our, our largest trading partner?
No, that would be Mexico, Canada and get this China.
Even over Israel, we don't even share the same main
religion, cultural, heritage or language.
That would be the uk, Australia, and Canada.
So she asked, do you mean they are your best ally,
Lindsey Graham, because they spend so much money
through their lobbies, pacs on your campaigns.
Yep. Now the scoop is that they are holding ammunition.
I just wanna highlight again, people like
Fetterman saying the same thing.
Hard disagree, frankly, nobody cares Fetterman.
But it says, I have consistently opposed
any conditions on supporting Israel.
That's what they're supposed to say apparently.
But I don't know why they think that's okay.
Zero conditions, they can do whatever they want.
Who cares about the Lehe laws or whatever else.
That doesn't matter. No conditions
as they battle in the State Department
or how they're supposed to be abiding by certain laws.
You realize conditions could be laws too, right?
So no laws are bound in regard to their support for Israel.
No conditions silly.
Now in regard to the deals we're talking about,
Hamas accepts ceasefire deal.
Now, this is from today.
It says Israel examining proposal.
IDF airstrikes, target Rafa.
So just showing you as we're pretending this is a deal,
they're literally bombing civilians with nowhere to go.
That's how gross this all is.
And that's why you're the politicians
that pretend it's not happening are equally disgusting
because it's unbelievably clear.
And that's why people in the UN
and un run the human rights groups, the doctors
that are seeing it are so horrified, most of them,
because they probably didn't see
how terrible things truly were,
thought they would stand up and fight for their own people.
Nope. Not ask the American
Palestinians how it's working out for 'em.
Point is, everyone's reported this,
that Hamas has accepted a deal, a deal by the way
that was being developed by Qatar
and the others involved that Israel is well aware of.
And guess what happens?
Well, first of all, this is the
multiple group showing you this
Hamas accepted ceasefire proposal.
But Israel said it was unacceptable.
Here's AP saying Israel leaders have approved a military
operation into the Gaza Strip of Rafa,
Gaza Strip city of Rafa.
So all we're showing you here is first of all,
that the moment it seemed like there was actually some kind
of a deal, what have we been telling you?
They don't want it. Their own people see that.
They want to continue this.
And I actually think at the expense
of even the hostages Hannibal directive, I think
that's provably obvious at this point.
But the reality is the moment it started
to seemed like it was gonna happen quickly approved the
thing that that's was supposed to stop everybody in this
deal except Israel, the primary thing they're trying
to stave off right now is the invasion of Rafa.
So the moment that it seems like it's gonna happen, they,
oh, let's invade Rafa.
I keep telling you, there's, this was met.
This is a tool that's been used.
Uh, there's, as we just showed you, Israeli officials,
other people involved, experts in the, on the military side
of this have told you, and I'm talking about former IDF
and current, that there is no military objective in Rafa.
It's a lie. There's nothing they will accomplish.
It will not end the war. Hamas is all over Gaza.
It's not just in Rafa.
They're pretending this is something
to use it to manipulate the world.
And guess what? Also the murdering of all the people
that are gonna happen in that process
so they can achieve some small military manipulative gain.
It's disgusting the deal though. Scroll down real quick.
They updated it. Here we go. Here's what it says.
The proposed ceasefire, the phases,
this one Israel disregarded.
And again, even though they were going back
and forth about this, Hamas on Monday has agreed
to a three-phase deal for a ceasefire
and hostages for prisoner swap.
Although an Israeli officials said the deal was not
acceptable to Israel because terms have been softened.
My point though is that this was in the back and forth.
This wasn't just Hamas standing back
and saying, no, this was going Qatar was involved.
It says the United States, which alongside Qatar in Egypt
have played a role mediating the talks,
said it was studying the Hamas response
and would discuss it with Middle East allies based on
details announced so far by Hamas officials
and an official briefed on the talks.
The deal that the Palestinian group said it had agreed
to included the following phase 1 42 day ceasefire period.
So it's guys, it's not even a complete ceasefire.
So that's actually pretty shocking to me
'cause I never thought that they would cave on that.
So it clearly shows you yet again
that Hamas is in fact even caving on their red line.
Hamas released 33 Israeli hostages in return
for Israel releasing Palestinians from Israeli jails,
Israel partially withdraws troops,
not even a full withdraw from Gaza
and allows the free movement
of Palestinians from south to North Gaza.
That's a huge issue for them for many reasons,
because one of the things they're doing, which I highlighted
for you, is put getting people in Northern Gaza
to renounce their right of return, filming them doing so
and having them return anything, any documents they have.
I mean, this is bigger than people realize.
So they can't do that. So now they're stuck now phase two,
another 42, 42 day period that features an agreement
and to restore a sustainable, calm to Gaza language
that an official brief from the talk set, Hamas
and Israel had actually agreed in order to take discussion
of the permanent ceasefire off the table.
See my point? So they did remove that line,
the complete withdrawal of most Israeli troops from Gaza,
which they could obviously put right back in the moment this
was over, which they, I can't guarantee they will.
Hamas releases Israeli reservists
and some soldiers in return
for Israel releasing Palestinians from jail.
Phase three, the completion of an exchange body.
So the rest of it, I guess. So all of them back and forth
and starting the implementation of reconstruction according
to the plan overseen by Qatar,
Egypt in the United Nations ending the complete blockade
of this, of God's a strip, which they'll never allow.
So all this shows you is that this is, is this is Hamas
with Qatar and Egypt and the United Nations
and the United States coming to an agreement in Israel,
the last second going, screw
that in invade Rafa acting like Hamas is the one
that somehow didn't do something like every
other time before this.
It is so infuriating that we even have to keep going
through this because of screamers online and elsewhere,
and most of which are your US government, by the way,
who scream falsehoods and pretend like it's not the reality
because of their own self-interest suppressed news,
highlights, breaking ceases fire terms
and everything you need to know, you
can read through it more here.
We just read the brief part of it. Here's Hamas' statement.
The fighter, the the, uh, it says, uh, the fighter brother,
uh, ISAL Hania, head of the political bureau
of the Hamas movement had a phone call
with the Qatari Prime Minister
and the end with the Egyptian Minister of Intelligence
and informed them that the Hamas movement's approval
of the proposal regarding the ceasefire agreement.
So here is, uh, AV zine from 9 7 2 magazine.
Hamas has not provided the formal answer.
Now this is before they officially said yes, right?
So just realizing this is what you said even
before they agreed that they hadn't
even given a formal answer.
So my, my answer, my point is why right then is Israel not
like, so if they hadn't answered that means at
that moment there was pretend action
that Israel was willing to accept it.
So if it had been given to Hamas to answer
and the mediators are involved, how do you not see that?
That's Israel. Now after they say yes, it's going, wait,
nevermind, it says,
and already Israel is making moves on Rafa.
So her point was, before they even answered,
Israel's already beginning to make this happen,
this is meant to destroy this like they have in every other
circumstance, every other pretend deal in the past,
they made sure it would look like Hamas refused it
or Palestine in general so they could blame it on them even
though they made sure as we now can prove that it was
so full of poison pills
and manipulations that they would never accept it.
The decision in part of Israel's effort to make it appear
as if it once the deal
and is doing everything to get one while Hamas is rejecting.
But this is misleading again, this is an Israeli writer
for 9 7 2 magazine.
Hamas did indicate it will agree to Egyptian proposal
and move ahead with the first stage relying on guarantees
that Israel will end war later on,
which I guarantee they won't.
There were several reports to this effect.
You can read 'em from Israeli journalists,
says Israel's portrayal
of Hamas rejectionism is factually incorrect at this point.
It looks like Netanyahu saw that Egypt
and the US pressure was working and decided to back out.
Well look at that. Pretty sure I already retweeted that.
But it says it also ignores the fact
that Israel's war objectives were in continued
to be direct conflict.
Indirect conflict. See, she, that's the point.
They've already stated
that they do not care about getting the hostages back
or released to the secondary.
They said that twice in the very first week of this.
If you want the hostages, you have to agree
to the proposal to end the war.
The entire security establishment is behind it as well.
The Hamas mortar and rocket attack from Rafa on Israeli's
soldiers, which is the truth of it.
And if we don't get there with time,
which it doesn't look like we will, that's the reality.
They bomb soldiers preparing for an invasion of Rafa
and all the liars like Elon Levy pretend they bombed the aid
that they're not bringing in.
It was a care, it was a pretty flimsy effort
to kill two birds with one stone.
But he says they on they bombed Israeli soldiers near the
Kareem Shalom Sunday night that killed three
and injured sev, uh, several more seriously
and is also contributing to deterioration
and could be a primary motive for Israel actions today.
But bottom line remains Israel's portrayal of Rafa invasion
as necessary for a win
for Israeli security does not have legs.
Numerous people inside their own apparatus have made
that clear any of offensive
and Rafa, she writes, in addition to further killing
and destruction in Gaza will hurt
chances to return hostages.
Everybody knows that they're lying to you in regard
to the Israeli government, the US government.
It will also escalate the region, uh, escalate the problem.
There is also no reason to believe that a military op,
whether limited or full scale in Rafa will provide a
different outcome than such ops have in other parts of Gaza,
which is absolute destruction.
Now, here is her point, gathered
outside the occupation forces their headquarters
in Tel Aviv of Israel.
Families of the Israeli captives are literally
chanting deal now.
Now every time I show you this,
people like Elon Levy grab this, post it
and say, see, they're calling on the UN
to that's not what they're doing.
He'll lie about it. I already see 'em doing it.
The point is that's not what they're saying.
This is what the writer we were just discussing, Mara,
from 9 7 2 magazine says,
one woman whose son is currently a hostage says if the
government doesn't go for the deal, the country will burn.
Here is her saying that on record
only Israeli people can end this massacre.
Sadly, families of Israeli detainees
and Gaza says, quote, Hamas agreed to the deal.
The government must agree now,
otherwise we will burn the country.
Uh, and of course this gets very little coverage
because it's challenging and people are expressing
it probably Twitter as well.
Here's Ben Shapiro lying about it as usual,
because he's such a coward today.
He can't acknowledge even the basic truth
around what's going on in Israel
because he's locked himself into a corner.
He's painted himself clearly into a position from which he
can't return because he spent the last seven months
screaming falsehoods.
He says, here's how this went down,
even though we just broke it down for you, Israel.
Here are the terms of our proposed ceasefire as if
that's the only thing that matters, right?
Hamas? No. We'll,
fire rockets at your soldiers at a humanitarian aid entry.
Well, at least he admits there were soldiers there, but the
but it was not even the same location.
The bottom line is, that's not what happened.
There was a deal on the table that Hamas accepted
that Israel backed out of.
And he says, Israel, okay, we're going into Rafa.
Which by the way, why is that some kind of counterbalance?
He says, Hamas, we accepted a ceasefire
negotiation with ourselves.
No, at worst they accepted it with everybody but Israel.
But that's not even what happened.
And he knows that this is cowardice.
And he goes, media, Hamas accepts ceasefire, right?
Because it's clear that all
of the media is clearly on the side of Gaza.
Really? You mean all the ones
that have been purposefully lying for this agenda for Israel
for seven months barely squeaking out truth here and there.
And again, they're telling you, the people on the ground,
Ben, are telling you that that's not the reality.
Great journalism bud. Here's Ellan Levy.
And this is funny because it's a follow up to what he said
before lying, right?
He came out early going, that's not true. Hamas did this.
Then he goes, oops, wait a minute. It looks like Hamas
didn't agree to the ceasefire.
'cause the only one the that matters
is the one Israel wants.
He says it agreed to a ceasefire
that's supposed to win you over.
What a complete moron like the bottom line is, we can see
publicly from all corporate media, including Israeli media,
that there was a, a ne negotiation going on.
So when you admit they agreed to a ceasefire, all
that proves is Israel backed out.
It says to a proposal that Israel hasn't agreed to
and maybe hasn't even seen.
Oh, maybe great job bud.
Maybe they literally just commented about it in
corporate media that they knew it.
And just this is, these are people that are so desperate
that they just have to lie
and hope they win somebody over, but nope, doesn't matter.
And then love this guy says, Elon,
you literally got fired for lying.
Shut up, the truth.
But here's Hartz with talk
with Hamas, talks on verge of collapse.
Netanyahu puts up a rejectionist front
and the director of the CIA was dispatched
to the Middle East in an effort to save the deal.
And Netanyahu is considering to be, is considered
to be the main obstacle.
But let's just listen to this fired liar over here
who says something different with text on Twitter.
'cause that's smart, right? How embarrassing for you.
Here's Dan Cohen, and this is actually really important.
Associated Press says the Hama Hamas announces
it has accepted the deal.
He writes, if Israel agrees to the ceasefire,
which I don't see happening, but if they do,
this is interesting, and this is
where the pressure's coming from, I guess in,
in Dan Cohen's reporting, and I agree with them, Ben Gere
and Smo tricks, the two as far as two of the most maniacal,
psychopathic in this whole thing will collapse.
The Netanyahu government and un
and unprecedented upheaval in Israeli society will begin
Israel's gigantic internal rift temporarily papered over
by the trauma of October 7th
and the war of Gaza, which is the truth,
they were boiling over wanting to lock up Netanyahu right
before this will exacerbate
to new levels potentially collapsing the state of Israel.
If Israel rejects, which it just did for the most part,
it will further cement its status as an international pariah
and only delay the inevitable.
Israel has no good options
because it's a prisoner of its own Zionist ideology.
Exactly what I'm saying.
Hamas one October 7th, Israel will admit defeat
or destroy itself is what he said.
Now, here is it, is it some is a, um, what was it again?
He was Oh, that's right.
The official account for the Secretary General of the League
of Arab nations speaking for the Arab nations
and simply saying, now some
of these were hashtags that I can't read.
But the general point is, despite what's been going on
and Hama and Hamas accepting the deal,
Israel's maneuvers indicate it's bad intentions.
It says they call, he calls on everybody to
and the western countries to support Israel
to assume the responsibilities
and restrain the occupying force
to prevent further deterioration of the situation.
As Palestinian civilians are the ones paying,
the price won't matter.
I don't think they're gonna care. Now,
just a couple last points, because
I'm gonna have to get outta here guys.
BM points out something very important.
This is what this is.
This is, uh, a couple of days ago on channel 12,
Shiman Boker, vice president of the world, LACO,
the international arm of Netanyahu's own party says, quote,
I think we should have gone into Rafa yesterday already.
He says, there are no uninvolved civilians there.
You have to go in and kill and kill and kill.
We have to kill them before they kill us.
How are we still pretending this is not the obvious reality
when it's literally on corporate media in Israel
and we're all just acting like it's not happening?
Or some people are. Wow, this is the truth, guys.
This is what they're trying to accomplish
if we just care to pay attention.
Now, I think I'm gonna end there, have to actually, I'll,
I'll, I'll rapidly go through the R of points.
Kaitlyn Johnstone. I'll just skip that for time here.
Here's the point. I just wanna include some of the points
of people highlighting the fact that British Air Force
bringing in military equipment could mean that we've seen it
before, but this does seem
to be a buildup support for what's gonna happen.
Rafa, Dr. Joe points out the image I used today.
This is Rafa from a,
this is I think from a couple a month ago or so.
The point is, they're preparing to invade this location.
Guys, all this other small area that's all people,
humanitarian tens all packed around this 600,000 children,
most of which are sick and
injured, that they're gonna invade.
They have nowhere to go.
Howard Beckett points out Israel issues an evacuation order
for 250,000 people in Rafa.
They don't have anywhere to go. Egypt won't let them pass.
They pleaded with the Israeli to not usher in the slaughter
of unleash the slaughter and Rafa.
They've been ignored. Everybody sees it building.
Nobody seems to be powerful enough to stop it.
This person points out the images reveal Israeli
militaries, reinforcements near the border.
So all this is showing you, again, Al Jazeera,
which is why they don't want it to be there, is
that they've literally barricaded them in.
They can't go to Egypt, they won't let 'em through.
They won't, they can't go back north.
They're in a box right now.
So when they begin to do the invasion on top
of the bombing they've been doing for months,
this is guaranteed to be a slaughter again.
That's what, I guess they're trying
to leverage that against the world.
James Elder from UNICEF says, we are told by Israel
that this will be a limited offensive.
We're told there would be no,
no way the South would endure the same thing
as the North admitting that they just murdered everybody.
But except Condiss, which is in the south,
is very clearly, absolutely destroyed.
They're lying. Red Crescent points out their headquarters
show thousands of civilians evacuating.
They're already fleeing for their lives, many of which,
just like before are getting a shot at or getting attacked.
Just like every other example we've seen, Israel officially
announces the beginning of their operations in Rafa,
which doesn't mean it's gonna happen.
They, I feel like they've done that before.
That's why I've been cautious about this reporting.
But it does seem that things are beginning,
so I'm very worried about
where this goes for the rest of the night.
It, I just, we just make sure we're paying attention,
make sure we're documenting everything.
Because I think this, hopefully it doesn't happen,
but I believe this is going
to be pretty bad if it goes forward like
way Israel wants it to.
And as Sarah Abdullah covers,
they're already attacking in Rafa just like they
already have been though for months.
But they're beginning defenseless, starving people, intenses
and they're bombing them right now.
IDF strikes a moss terror targets in Rafa
as it's already beginning.
That's how this works, right? But here's why they say this.
Here's Fox News. Hamas kingpin hold up in Gaza,
or likely in cutter, in some air conditioned room
doling out things Israel wants 'em to say.
My personal opinion, aside from the reality that
Hamas Israel has an open policy
of human shields called neighbor
procedure that nobody wants to talk about.
The claim is experts say they're using human shields.
You wanna see why they say that great, great journalism.
This one guy who is an American analyst simply says,
my sources tell me, which we don't get to know who they are.
The number one leader of Hamas organization has 15,
20 hostages protecting his family.
That's why human shields, that's it. That's it.
That's all you get. You get one guy saying his sources
that we don't get to see claim,
he's got this many people in Gaza that prove,
even though there's not a single point
of evidence we've ever seen since October 7th,
that proves any of these things, certainly could be,
it wouldn't surprise me.
Meanwhile, we can literally prove how they continue
to use human shields in Gaza, Israel.
Lastly, the hostages that have come home continue to tell us
that they watched them kill people, their own people.
We'll just leave it there. We were gonna
get into the cream crossing.
Just recognize guys that they're lying about it,
like damn near everything else.
And also recognize that they are continuing to blockade us.
Senior of official says Northern Gaza is now in full blown
famine here.
Philip Lazar Gaza said, the Israeli authorities continue
to deny humanitarian aid.
This was on yesterday, and they just keep lying about it.
Francesca Albany, we haven't seen reject.
We, what I have seen, rejected by Israel
and stored in warehouses in Northern Sonai is not just
critical supplies for survival in Gaza.
It's the solidarity of so many people from the world.
Bri, Brazil, France, Kuwait, Singapore.
You can see their, their age just sitting in their houses
doing nothing, most of which is simple food
or things that they need, they do not allow.
And here is the reality on the ground.
As Mo Mohad SFA points out 245 calories, children
and Gaza have only 245 calories a day.
Forced starvation is an act of genocide.
Let that picture sit with you. That's the reality guys.
That's what they're doing. And of course,
they're now currently, as of today, bombing in Rafa.
While there are British government aid workers there
as well, but they don't care anybody trying to help them.
The, the o the obvious reality is here.
Now, unfortunately, I do have to break off guys,
limited time today, but thank you for tuning in.
I think it's important that we continue
to highlight the lies despite is, you know, despite
how uncomfortable it might be for some,
because it's so easy to prove that they're lying.
And right now, I hope to God
that this does not continue
the way they're talking about it.
I hope it's just actual leverage
and that they back down knowing
that they don't have position to make this happen.
But something tells me the belligerent nature
of the people involved in their government,
that they'll push this farther just
to see if they can scare people away from pushing back.
And you know, who the cat, the, the bi, the,
the most hurt in that situation.
The Palestinian civilians, mostly children.
That's what we're dealing with. That's what your government
around the world, most of them are still blindly supporting
and signing documents to try
to stop people from investigating.
That's not a rules based. Anything.
That's a belligerent authoritarian government fighting
for its partners at the expense of you.
Thank you for tuning in today. I love you all as always.
Question everything come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.