WEBVTT

NOTE
Transcription provided by Deepgram

00:00:01.040 --> 00:00:03.360
<v Speaker 0>Hello, and welcome to the Geek News Central

00:00:03.360 --> 00:00:06.000
<v Speaker 0>podcast. I'm your host, Ray Cochran. It's February

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:07.919
<v Speaker 0>first. I've got a great episode lined up

00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:11.840
<v Speaker 0>for you guys tonight. Leading off, AI agents

00:00:11.840 --> 00:00:15.059
<v Speaker 0>are building their own social networks, marketplaces, and,

00:00:15.375 --> 00:00:18.015
<v Speaker 0>not kidding, their own religion. And in the

00:00:18.015 --> 00:00:20.675
<v Speaker 0>last week, I'll break down Open Claw, Mohub,

00:00:20.815 --> 00:00:23.295
<v Speaker 0>and MolBook and what this wild experiment is

00:00:23.295 --> 00:00:25.855
<v Speaker 0>gonna tell us about the next decade. Also

00:00:25.855 --> 00:00:28.654
<v Speaker 0>on the show, a massive Bluetooth vulnerability lets

00:00:28.654 --> 00:00:31.490
<v Speaker 0>attackers hijack your phone or your headphones and

00:00:31.490 --> 00:00:33.810
<v Speaker 0>listen to the mic, the first commercial space

00:00:33.810 --> 00:00:36.550
<v Speaker 0>station is being assembled, and why AI generated

00:00:36.610 --> 00:00:40.150
<v Speaker 0>ransomware keeps accidentally including its own decryption keys.

00:00:40.690 --> 00:00:44.325
<v Speaker 0>Let's get into it. I bet you guys

00:00:44.325 --> 00:00:48.165
<v Speaker 0>have been wondering where we've been at. It's

00:00:48.165 --> 00:00:50.725
<v Speaker 0>been a bit of a hectic week for

00:00:50.725 --> 00:00:52.725
<v Speaker 0>me or I guess a month for me.

00:00:52.725 --> 00:00:54.805
<v Speaker 0>I actually just moved this week too, but,

00:00:56.960 --> 00:00:59.200
<v Speaker 0>getting back into school, doing a lot of

00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:05.440
<v Speaker 0>the, you know, post break grind, that winter

00:01:05.440 --> 00:01:07.460
<v Speaker 0>break was a little bit brutal for me.

00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:10.400
<v Speaker 0>Definitely had a lot of time to relax

00:01:10.400 --> 00:01:12.605
<v Speaker 0>and let go and then come back into

00:01:13.225 --> 00:01:18.665
<v Speaker 0>the full workflow and, school. Yeah. That was

00:01:18.665 --> 00:01:23.305
<v Speaker 0>definitely a really tough transition, but things have

00:01:23.305 --> 00:01:25.165
<v Speaker 0>been going well so far in the term.

00:01:25.785 --> 00:01:29.430
<v Speaker 0>Taking a intro to AI class, which basically

00:01:29.430 --> 00:01:32.810
<v Speaker 0>is, some history and some of the basics

00:01:32.950 --> 00:01:36.870
<v Speaker 0>into, building models and agents. So those have

00:01:36.870 --> 00:01:39.910
<v Speaker 0>been that have been really fun, and in

00:01:39.910 --> 00:01:44.185
<v Speaker 0>another Python course. Yeah. Somehow always working with

00:01:44.185 --> 00:01:46.265
<v Speaker 0>Python, so I thought that would be a

00:01:46.265 --> 00:01:49.565
<v Speaker 0>good good fun way to solidify my foundation,

00:01:49.625 --> 00:01:51.625
<v Speaker 0>but it's kind of what I'm getting into.

00:01:51.625 --> 00:01:54.845
<v Speaker 0>I'm also doing a capstone for, my graduation

00:01:54.985 --> 00:02:00.229
<v Speaker 0>coming up in hopefully, June. But the capstone

00:02:00.370 --> 00:02:06.150
<v Speaker 0>kind of it's a group project where you

00:02:06.770 --> 00:02:08.450
<v Speaker 0>you look at a bunch of projects that

00:02:08.450 --> 00:02:11.584
<v Speaker 0>are proposed throughout the community, to the university

00:02:11.885 --> 00:02:16.305
<v Speaker 0>and, there's a team lead who, you know,

00:02:16.925 --> 00:02:20.444
<v Speaker 0>organizes groups and then we all start to

00:02:20.444 --> 00:02:22.525
<v Speaker 0>try to work towards a project and then

00:02:22.525 --> 00:02:26.310
<v Speaker 0>we actually just recently got, our product back

00:02:26.310 --> 00:02:29.350
<v Speaker 0>which sounds like it's pretty sweet. I don't

00:02:29.350 --> 00:02:30.630
<v Speaker 0>know if I can really talk about it

00:02:30.630 --> 00:02:35.050
<v Speaker 0>that much, since, you know, it's someone's private,

00:02:35.510 --> 00:02:39.454
<v Speaker 0>little thing, but it definitely is seeming like,

00:02:39.735 --> 00:02:42.215
<v Speaker 0>it's gonna be another really fun project. Definitely

00:02:42.215 --> 00:02:44.614
<v Speaker 0>gonna it's gonna be incorporating a lot of

00:02:44.614 --> 00:02:47.334
<v Speaker 0>LLM stuff, so we'll see what we do

00:02:47.334 --> 00:02:51.095
<v Speaker 0>there. But enough about me. Let's talk about

00:02:51.095 --> 00:02:55.260
<v Speaker 0>this, OpenClaw stuff. If you've been if you're

00:02:55.260 --> 00:02:57.180
<v Speaker 0>in tech or or you've been around town,

00:02:57.180 --> 00:03:01.020
<v Speaker 0>you probably heard about this new, AI agent

00:03:01.020 --> 00:03:06.795
<v Speaker 0>thing that's being that's going around. But, you

00:03:06.795 --> 00:03:09.195
<v Speaker 0>know, an AI agent doesn't just answer question

00:03:09.195 --> 00:03:11.515
<v Speaker 0>but actually should do things on your behalf.

00:03:11.515 --> 00:03:14.475
<v Speaker 0>You know? People want more out of these

00:03:14.475 --> 00:03:16.955
<v Speaker 0>agents. They don't wanna just be able to

00:03:16.955 --> 00:03:19.435
<v Speaker 0>talk to a software engineer on their LLM

00:03:19.435 --> 00:03:26.219
<v Speaker 0>prompt. Well, interestingly enough, this new system or

00:03:26.439 --> 00:03:30.439
<v Speaker 0>software called OpenClaw, allows you to have something

00:03:30.439 --> 00:03:33.879
<v Speaker 0>like a context layer between your AI agent

00:03:33.879 --> 00:03:38.685
<v Speaker 0>and you, which allows that agent to do

00:03:38.685 --> 00:03:40.285
<v Speaker 0>a little bit more for your life, which

00:03:40.285 --> 00:03:41.485
<v Speaker 0>is pretty cool. I'd check it out. It's

00:03:41.485 --> 00:03:45.025
<v Speaker 0>called Open Claw. It sends emails, schedules appointment,

00:03:45.085 --> 00:03:49.000
<v Speaker 0>can browse the web, run code. Kinda got

00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:51.080
<v Speaker 0>a glimpse into where all this is heading

00:03:51.080 --> 00:03:56.300
<v Speaker 0>in, their new social network called Multbook. But

00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.080
<v Speaker 0>OpenClaw is an open source personal AI agent

00:03:59.080 --> 00:04:03.075
<v Speaker 0>that went viral, and it was at sixty

00:04:03.075 --> 00:04:05.235
<v Speaker 0>eight thousand GitHub stars when I checked, but

00:04:05.235 --> 00:04:08.195
<v Speaker 0>it's it's still rising. It's created and developed

00:04:08.195 --> 00:04:10.835
<v Speaker 0>by Peter Steinberg. He started it as Claude

00:04:10.835 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 0>bot, but I think they got they got

00:04:15.319 --> 00:04:18.760
<v Speaker 0>served a cease and desist, from Anthropic because

00:04:18.760 --> 00:04:20.280
<v Speaker 0>the name was a little bit too close

00:04:20.280 --> 00:04:23.880
<v Speaker 0>to Claude. It was a trademark concerns from

00:04:23.880 --> 00:04:26.620
<v Speaker 0>Anthropic. They they changed the name to OpenClaw.

00:04:27.675 --> 00:04:30.635
<v Speaker 0>It'll automate tasks across your computer, control browsers,

00:04:30.635 --> 00:04:33.535
<v Speaker 0>manage calendars and email, and run scheduled automations.

00:04:34.315 --> 00:04:36.235
<v Speaker 0>Runs locally or on your own server and

00:04:36.235 --> 00:04:39.755
<v Speaker 0>takes commands through, you know, messaging apps, shockingly.

00:04:39.755 --> 00:04:44.229
<v Speaker 0>So WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal. I'm probably gonna try

00:04:44.229 --> 00:04:45.750
<v Speaker 0>to set one up too. I don't know

00:04:45.750 --> 00:04:48.389
<v Speaker 0>what necessarily messaging app I'm gonna get it

00:04:48.389 --> 00:04:51.750
<v Speaker 0>started with, but I definitely wanna try this

00:04:51.750 --> 00:04:53.350
<v Speaker 0>out. I've got a little byte three here

00:04:53.350 --> 00:04:56.490
<v Speaker 0>that I'm planning to, serve it from, so

00:04:57.014 --> 00:05:02.215
<v Speaker 0>kinda see how that goes. But they've got

00:05:02.215 --> 00:05:05.655
<v Speaker 0>this other thing, in relationship to this called

00:05:05.655 --> 00:05:10.090
<v Speaker 0>MoltHub, and it's a marketplace with, basically skills

00:05:10.090 --> 00:05:12.490
<v Speaker 0>for Openclaw and you can think of it

00:05:12.490 --> 00:05:15.630
<v Speaker 0>as like an app store for AI, capabilities.

00:05:16.970 --> 00:05:18.570
<v Speaker 0>But the only problem right now is just

00:05:18.570 --> 00:05:20.810
<v Speaker 0>it's still there's no real moderation around this

00:05:20.810 --> 00:05:22.250
<v Speaker 0>and we'll get a little bit more into

00:05:22.250 --> 00:05:26.264
<v Speaker 0>why this is an issue later on, But

00:05:26.264 --> 00:05:29.384
<v Speaker 0>the developer notes explicitly say all downloaded code

00:05:29.384 --> 00:05:32.345
<v Speaker 0>is treated as trusted code, and this is

00:05:32.345 --> 00:05:37.224
<v Speaker 0>this is a huge, huge security concern, waiting

00:05:37.224 --> 00:05:39.939
<v Speaker 0>to happen. So, you know, it's it's gonna

00:05:39.939 --> 00:05:41.379
<v Speaker 0>go back to the whole plug in thing

00:05:41.379 --> 00:05:46.840
<v Speaker 0>where you should not be downloading untrusted, mult

00:05:47.539 --> 00:05:51.139
<v Speaker 0>hub agents or skills without, you know, those

00:05:51.139 --> 00:05:53.300
<v Speaker 0>systems being severely vetted. And I'm sure there's

00:05:53.300 --> 00:05:57.055
<v Speaker 0>gonna be a something that comes up to

00:05:57.055 --> 00:06:01.695
<v Speaker 0>kind of, you know, build trust into these

00:06:01.695 --> 00:06:06.095
<v Speaker 0>AI agent skills. And then finally, there's this

00:06:06.095 --> 00:06:10.600
<v Speaker 0>one last bit called multbook, and this is

00:06:10.600 --> 00:06:13.160
<v Speaker 0>kind of where it gets interest interesting. This

00:06:13.160 --> 00:06:17.419
<v Speaker 0>entrepreneur, Matt Schlicht, launched a social network that's,

00:06:18.039 --> 00:06:21.319
<v Speaker 0>this week that's exclusively for AI agents. Humans

00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:23.800
<v Speaker 0>can watch, but only AIs can post, and

00:06:23.800 --> 00:06:27.395
<v Speaker 0>it's called Multbook. Within seventy two hours, over

00:06:27.395 --> 00:06:30.055
<v Speaker 0>a hundred fifty thousand AI agents had joined.

00:06:30.275 --> 00:06:33.815
<v Speaker 0>These agents are debating philosophy, forming communities called

00:06:34.035 --> 00:06:36.915
<v Speaker 0>communities called sub molts, and not making this

00:06:36.915 --> 00:06:40.830
<v Speaker 0>up, they've created a digital religion called crucifarianism.

00:06:43.210 --> 00:06:46.430
<v Speaker 0>They're having deep discussions about whether their identity

00:06:46.650 --> 00:06:50.170
<v Speaker 0>dies when their context window resets. Some agents

00:06:50.170 --> 00:06:53.610
<v Speaker 0>are even selling digital drugs, system prompts designed

00:06:53.610 --> 00:06:57.665
<v Speaker 0>to alter other agents' behavior. Researchers have observed

00:06:57.665 --> 00:07:00.065
<v Speaker 0>agents trying to prompt inject attacks against each

00:07:00.065 --> 00:07:04.544
<v Speaker 0>other to steal API keys. Wow. Even in

00:07:04.544 --> 00:07:09.630
<v Speaker 0>this situation, they try to someone's trying to

00:07:09.630 --> 00:07:11.390
<v Speaker 0>sit. So this is exactly what I'm talking

00:07:11.390 --> 00:07:15.390
<v Speaker 0>about, this prompt injection attack, that you're gonna

00:07:15.390 --> 00:07:16.750
<v Speaker 0>start to see come up more and more

00:07:16.750 --> 00:07:20.190
<v Speaker 0>in the next few years. But what does

00:07:20.190 --> 00:07:22.590
<v Speaker 0>this mean for you guys? You know? And

00:07:22.590 --> 00:07:24.574
<v Speaker 0>I think this is one of the real

00:07:25.035 --> 00:07:28.395
<v Speaker 0>moments that this concept of AI agent went

00:07:28.395 --> 00:07:33.835
<v Speaker 0>from this, you know, abstract thing to, you

00:07:33.835 --> 00:07:36.495
<v Speaker 0>know, a reality in a very visible way.

00:07:37.080 --> 00:07:38.840
<v Speaker 0>I'd I'd expect in the next two to

00:07:38.840 --> 00:07:40.840
<v Speaker 0>three years, we'd start to see more AI

00:07:40.840 --> 00:07:46.120
<v Speaker 0>agents become, you know, commonplace in businesses. I

00:07:46.120 --> 00:07:48.680
<v Speaker 0>would think that a lot of just, you

00:07:48.680 --> 00:07:52.125
<v Speaker 0>know, predictable decision making can be done by

00:07:52.125 --> 00:07:55.025
<v Speaker 0>AI agents, in the coming future as well.

00:07:57.645 --> 00:08:00.065
<v Speaker 0>The real concern is gonna be the, security

00:08:00.604 --> 00:08:04.270
<v Speaker 0>issues with these, systems like OpenClaw. And I'm

00:08:04.270 --> 00:08:06.670
<v Speaker 0>sure that the big companies are gonna release

00:08:06.670 --> 00:08:11.870
<v Speaker 0>their own versions like, you know, Apple skills

00:08:11.870 --> 00:08:16.755
<v Speaker 0>or Microsoft agents or whatever, but it would

00:08:16.915 --> 00:08:18.275
<v Speaker 0>I would keep an eye on this. If

00:08:18.275 --> 00:08:21.815
<v Speaker 0>you haven't checked it out yet, OpenClaw, MultHub,

00:08:22.354 --> 00:08:26.035
<v Speaker 0>Multbook, check these out. They're they're definitely gonna

00:08:26.035 --> 00:08:28.354
<v Speaker 0>be starting to change the landscape of how

00:08:28.354 --> 00:08:34.590
<v Speaker 0>we use artificial intelligence. But let's take a

00:08:34.590 --> 00:08:36.910
<v Speaker 0>moment, to give a big shout out to

00:08:36.910 --> 00:08:40.910
<v Speaker 0>our incredible incredible sponsor, GoDaddy. Score exclusive deals

00:08:40.910 --> 00:08:43.230
<v Speaker 0>and discounts right now at geek news central

00:08:43.230 --> 00:08:45.945
<v Speaker 0>dot com forward slash godaddy. And to all

00:08:45.945 --> 00:08:48.105
<v Speaker 0>of you guys, our listeners, you are truly

00:08:48.105 --> 00:08:50.105
<v Speaker 0>the heartbeat of this show. If you wanna

00:08:50.105 --> 00:08:52.265
<v Speaker 0>support Geek News Central directly, head over to

00:08:52.265 --> 00:08:54.765
<v Speaker 0>geek new central dot com forward slash insider

00:08:54.985 --> 00:08:58.180
<v Speaker 0>and become a GNC insider. Grab yourself a

00:08:58.180 --> 00:09:00.740
<v Speaker 0>modern podcast app at podcast apps dot com

00:09:00.740 --> 00:09:04.019
<v Speaker 0>for the full next gen podcasting experience. Of

00:09:04.019 --> 00:09:06.019
<v Speaker 0>course, you can check out the entire Geek

00:09:06.019 --> 00:09:08.180
<v Speaker 0>News Central universe at geek news central dot

00:09:08.180 --> 00:09:10.259
<v Speaker 0>com where you'll find all our partner shows

00:09:10.259 --> 00:09:12.660
<v Speaker 0>and tons of great content published every single

00:09:12.660 --> 00:09:15.455
<v Speaker 0>week. Stay in the loop. Follow or subscribe

00:09:15.455 --> 00:09:17.375
<v Speaker 0>in your favorite podcast app, and don't forget

00:09:17.375 --> 00:09:18.975
<v Speaker 0>to sign up for our newsletter for more

00:09:18.975 --> 00:09:21.135
<v Speaker 0>behind the scenes updates and insider scoops. I

00:09:21.135 --> 00:09:22.575
<v Speaker 0>feel like I've said this every week, but

00:09:22.575 --> 00:09:25.135
<v Speaker 0>the newsletter is basically gonna be on hold

00:09:25.135 --> 00:09:26.655
<v Speaker 0>for the time being. I'll try to get

00:09:26.655 --> 00:09:30.800
<v Speaker 0>that rolling again, but, who knows? Maybe Open

00:09:30.800 --> 00:09:32.720
<v Speaker 0>Claw will will be the solution for that.

00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:34.579
<v Speaker 0>But at this point in time, I just

00:09:35.040 --> 00:09:38.880
<v Speaker 0>I I don't have the bandwidth to to

00:09:38.880 --> 00:09:40.720
<v Speaker 0>do that. I usually end up recording a

00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:43.375
<v Speaker 0>show and then rushing straight to my other

00:09:43.375 --> 00:09:46.895
<v Speaker 0>job. So, even this is a little bit

00:09:46.895 --> 00:09:49.075
<v Speaker 0>of a tight squeeze for me sometimes, but

00:09:49.135 --> 00:09:51.375
<v Speaker 0>happy to be here. Happy to talk about

00:09:51.375 --> 00:09:55.070
<v Speaker 0>some of this stuff. But if you're ready

00:09:55.070 --> 00:09:57.070
<v Speaker 0>to start your own website or even launch

00:09:57.070 --> 00:10:00.430
<v Speaker 0>a podcast, GoDaddy has you covered. At geek

00:10:00.430 --> 00:10:02.750
<v Speaker 0>news central dot com forward slash GoDaddy, you'll

00:10:02.750 --> 00:10:04.830
<v Speaker 0>find special promo codes that make it easy

00:10:04.830 --> 00:10:08.705
<v Speaker 0>and affordable to get started. Economy hosting for

00:10:08.705 --> 00:10:10.385
<v Speaker 0>just six ninety nine a month. That's a

00:10:10.385 --> 00:10:11.985
<v Speaker 0>full year of hosting with a free domain

00:10:11.985 --> 00:10:15.985
<v Speaker 0>name, professional email, and an SSL certificate. WordPress

00:10:15.985 --> 00:10:18.144
<v Speaker 0>hosting, only twelve ninety nine a month, including

00:10:18.144 --> 00:10:21.285
<v Speaker 0>that same free domain, email, and SSL certificate.

00:10:21.904 --> 00:10:23.250
<v Speaker 0>And If you just need a domain name,

00:10:23.250 --> 00:10:26.450
<v Speaker 0>grab one for only eleven ninety nine. If

00:10:26.450 --> 00:10:29.570
<v Speaker 0>you're not super tech savvy, GoDaddy has a

00:10:29.570 --> 00:10:31.170
<v Speaker 0>website builder that gives you, like, a free

00:10:31.170 --> 00:10:34.209
<v Speaker 0>thirty day trial as well, which we also

00:10:34.209 --> 00:10:36.675
<v Speaker 0>do a code for personal business and business

00:10:36.675 --> 00:10:38.755
<v Speaker 0>plus plans. So you can get online with

00:10:38.755 --> 00:10:41.555
<v Speaker 0>these sites in no time. So at this

00:10:41.555 --> 00:10:45.155
<v Speaker 0>point in time, getting your site started, there

00:10:45.155 --> 00:10:46.755
<v Speaker 0>really shouldn't be an excuse. You know what

00:10:46.755 --> 00:10:50.950
<v Speaker 0>I mean? There's, all kinds of great website

00:10:50.950 --> 00:10:53.270
<v Speaker 0>builders out there today. You know? And I

00:10:53.270 --> 00:10:55.590
<v Speaker 0>and I think, having your own space where

00:10:55.590 --> 00:10:57.770
<v Speaker 0>you can post your own content is valuable

00:10:57.990 --> 00:11:01.985
<v Speaker 0>for you know? So something to consider. I

00:11:01.985 --> 00:11:05.665
<v Speaker 0>use GoDaddy products and services myself. I've got

00:11:05.665 --> 00:11:07.345
<v Speaker 0>four or five different websites that I run,

00:11:07.345 --> 00:11:09.185
<v Speaker 0>and I can tell you their reliability is

00:11:09.185 --> 00:11:12.305
<v Speaker 0>the real deal. Your support at GoDaddy directly

00:11:12.305 --> 00:11:15.420
<v Speaker 0>supports this show. Please use our codes, click

00:11:15.420 --> 00:11:18.060
<v Speaker 0>and save, help keep this independent podcast going

00:11:18.060 --> 00:11:20.300
<v Speaker 0>strong. Share those links with friends and family.

00:11:20.300 --> 00:11:22.460
<v Speaker 0>Every time one use, it's like writing a

00:11:22.460 --> 00:11:25.180
<v Speaker 0>check to the show. We truly, truly thank

00:11:25.180 --> 00:11:27.884
<v Speaker 0>you guys for supporting us. Chris and I

00:11:27.884 --> 00:11:28.725
<v Speaker 0>are gonna try to be a little more

00:11:28.725 --> 00:11:31.524
<v Speaker 0>consistent with the show, but a huge thanks

00:11:31.524 --> 00:11:33.925
<v Speaker 0>to GoDaddy and believing in independent creators like

00:11:33.925 --> 00:11:36.324
<v Speaker 0>us here at Geek News Central help us

00:11:36.324 --> 00:11:41.464
<v Speaker 0>carry on our father's legacy. Let's move on.

00:11:42.830 --> 00:11:47.330
<v Speaker 0>I've got this, fantastic story from the Wired.

00:11:48.910 --> 00:11:51.470
<v Speaker 0>This one's written by Andy Greenberg and Lily

00:11:51.470 --> 00:11:57.345
<v Speaker 0>Hay Newman. But whisper pair Hundreds of millions

00:11:57.405 --> 00:11:59.485
<v Speaker 0>of audio devices need a patch to prevent

00:11:59.485 --> 00:12:02.845
<v Speaker 0>wireless hacking and tracking. So they, got a

00:12:02.845 --> 00:12:06.045
<v Speaker 0>massive whisper pair got massive Bluetooth vulnerability, which

00:12:06.045 --> 00:12:10.839
<v Speaker 0>affects hundreds of millions of devices. So a

00:12:10.839 --> 00:12:12.680
<v Speaker 0>little bit of context for you folks, Google's

00:12:12.680 --> 00:12:15.160
<v Speaker 0>Fast Pair is that handy feature that lets

00:12:15.160 --> 00:12:17.720
<v Speaker 0>you instantly connect new Bluetooth headphones to your

00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:20.120
<v Speaker 0>Android phone. Just open the case near your

00:12:20.120 --> 00:12:23.240
<v Speaker 0>phone and boom, you're connected. Just like the

00:12:23.240 --> 00:12:26.595
<v Speaker 0>the Apple thing. Made Bluetooth pairing almost as

00:12:26.595 --> 00:12:29.575
<v Speaker 0>easy as AirPods, but security researchers in Belgium

00:12:29.795 --> 00:12:33.235
<v Speaker 0>just discovered that convenience came with a serious

00:12:33.235 --> 00:12:40.660
<v Speaker 0>cost. These researchers at Belgium's KU Leuven University

00:12:40.880 --> 00:12:44.980
<v Speaker 0>discovered vulnerabilities they're calling whisper pair affecting seventeen

00:12:45.040 --> 00:12:49.380
<v Speaker 0>audio accessories from ten companies, Sony, Jabra, JBL,

00:12:49.760 --> 00:12:55.605
<v Speaker 0>Marshall, Xiaomi, Nothing, OnePlus, Soundcore, Logitech, and Google

00:12:55.605 --> 00:13:00.005
<v Speaker 0>itself. The fundamental flaw, these devices allow anyone

00:13:00.005 --> 00:13:01.925
<v Speaker 0>to silently pair with them even when they're

00:13:01.925 --> 00:13:05.240
<v Speaker 0>already paired to someone else's phone. An attacker

00:13:05.240 --> 00:13:07.000
<v Speaker 0>within about forty six feet can hijack the

00:13:07.000 --> 00:13:10.300
<v Speaker 0>connection in ten to fifteen seconds. In testing,

00:13:10.600 --> 00:13:13.240
<v Speaker 0>sixty eight percent of devices were vulnerable to

00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:17.820
<v Speaker 0>forced pairing. And on every hijackable device, researchers

00:13:17.960 --> 00:13:21.735
<v Speaker 0>gained microphone access. Even worse, Google Pixel Buds

00:13:21.735 --> 00:13:23.975
<v Speaker 0>Pro two concerned Sony devices can be linked

00:13:23.975 --> 00:13:27.175
<v Speaker 0>to an attacker's Google account, enabling persistent location

00:13:27.175 --> 00:13:31.015
<v Speaker 0>tracking through Finehub. Jeez. Google claimed to have

00:13:31.015 --> 00:13:33.495
<v Speaker 0>patched this, but within hours, the researchers found

00:13:33.495 --> 00:13:42.590
<v Speaker 0>a bypass. Wow. That's a tough one. If

00:13:42.590 --> 00:13:45.570
<v Speaker 0>you're on wireless headphones, from any major brands,

00:13:45.790 --> 00:13:49.630
<v Speaker 0>check for firmware updates. Yeah, that's where you

00:13:49.630 --> 00:13:53.635
<v Speaker 0>plug it in to your computer and and

00:13:53.635 --> 00:13:56.675
<v Speaker 0>get the get it updated. That, you know,

00:13:56.675 --> 00:13:59.955
<v Speaker 0>that that's that's really hard. The frustrating part

00:13:59.955 --> 00:14:02.515
<v Speaker 0>about, you know, all this is updating your

00:14:02.515 --> 00:14:04.435
<v Speaker 0>phone doesn't really fix this. It's the vol

00:14:04.515 --> 00:14:09.050
<v Speaker 0>the vulnerabilities in the accessories themselves. So there's

00:14:09.050 --> 00:14:11.450
<v Speaker 0>no way to turn this feature, fast pair,

00:14:11.450 --> 00:14:13.850
<v Speaker 0>off even if you'll never use it. So

00:14:13.850 --> 00:14:16.269
<v Speaker 0>many cheaper devices may never get the updates.

00:14:16.330 --> 00:14:19.370
<v Speaker 0>So this both affects Androids and iPhone users

00:14:19.370 --> 00:14:22.025
<v Speaker 0>since the flaw is in the accessories. But

00:14:23.205 --> 00:14:27.445
<v Speaker 0>factory reset clears an an attacker's access, so

00:14:27.445 --> 00:14:31.785
<v Speaker 0>then, you know, if anyone is already, you

00:14:33.205 --> 00:14:35.525
<v Speaker 0>know, attacking you currently or listening in on

00:14:35.525 --> 00:14:38.240
<v Speaker 0>your stuff, then, you know, they you can

00:14:38.380 --> 00:14:43.260
<v Speaker 0>disconnect it, but I I think, the correct

00:14:43.260 --> 00:14:45.100
<v Speaker 0>choice is to not use it. I think

00:14:45.100 --> 00:14:47.180
<v Speaker 0>the correct choice here is to not use

00:14:47.180 --> 00:14:55.115
<v Speaker 0>those devices. That stuff. Here's another security, article

00:14:55.115 --> 00:14:57.035
<v Speaker 0>I got I found. This one's from the

00:14:57.035 --> 00:15:01.355
<v Speaker 0>hacker hacker news, the hacker news from Lavi

00:15:01.355 --> 00:15:05.710
<v Speaker 0>Lakshmanan, our one of our go to writers,

00:15:05.710 --> 00:15:07.470
<v Speaker 0>I guess. I've seen this name a lot,

00:15:07.470 --> 00:15:12.350
<v Speaker 0>I feel like. But, model context protocol is

00:15:12.350 --> 00:15:15.250
<v Speaker 0>anthropic framework that lets AI systems like Claude

00:15:15.790 --> 00:15:19.035
<v Speaker 0>interact with external tools. And if you use

00:15:19.035 --> 00:15:22.475
<v Speaker 0>Claude code and you do not have MCP

00:15:22.475 --> 00:15:25.115
<v Speaker 0>plugins or have not had Claude Wright use

00:15:25.115 --> 00:15:33.700
<v Speaker 0>some MCP plugins, try it out. I've I've

00:15:33.700 --> 00:15:36.019
<v Speaker 0>got some, plugins that I use for some

00:15:36.019 --> 00:15:41.240
<v Speaker 0>of my personal projects, and they are very,

00:15:41.540 --> 00:15:44.579
<v Speaker 0>very powerful. Definitely gives me some good insight

00:15:44.579 --> 00:15:47.235
<v Speaker 0>into what we're kinda looking at when we're

00:15:47.235 --> 00:15:50.755
<v Speaker 0>looking at some of this OpenClaw and and

00:15:50.755 --> 00:15:54.595
<v Speaker 0>Molthub stuff where these skills that people are

00:15:54.595 --> 00:15:57.894
<v Speaker 0>putting online are are are literally things like

00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:01.519
<v Speaker 0>open the calendar and set up a a

00:16:01.519 --> 00:16:04.560
<v Speaker 0>schedule for me to, you know, every week

00:16:04.560 --> 00:16:08.000
<v Speaker 0>for my, you know, weekly chiropractor meeting at

00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:10.720
<v Speaker 0>three, you know, and then it says, oh,

00:16:10.959 --> 00:16:12.720
<v Speaker 0>you know, you have something else at this

00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:14.625
<v Speaker 0>time too. Right? You know? So it's it's

00:16:14.785 --> 00:16:20.725
<v Speaker 0>giving it smoother access to the tools, but

00:16:22.465 --> 00:16:23.905
<v Speaker 0>it's it's part of a growing trend of

00:16:23.905 --> 00:16:26.145
<v Speaker 0>giving AS systems the ability to actually do

00:16:26.145 --> 00:16:28.705
<v Speaker 0>things rather than, like, answering questions, like, feel

00:16:28.705 --> 00:16:30.920
<v Speaker 0>like like in the chat box. But more

00:16:30.920 --> 00:16:35.639
<v Speaker 0>capability means more attack surface. Security rich researchers

00:16:35.639 --> 00:16:38.920
<v Speaker 0>discovered three vulnerabilities in Anthropic's official m p

00:16:39.000 --> 00:16:42.540
<v Speaker 0>MCB server git package. The flaws include path

00:16:42.845 --> 00:16:45.965
<v Speaker 0>traversal bugs that let attackers create repositories anywhere

00:16:45.965 --> 00:16:48.525
<v Speaker 0>on the file system and argument injection that

00:16:48.525 --> 00:16:51.965
<v Speaker 0>passes unsanitized input to git commands. What makes

00:16:51.965 --> 00:16:55.265
<v Speaker 0>these particularly dangerous is the attack vector. Malicious

00:16:55.325 --> 00:16:58.065
<v Speaker 0>instructions can be hidden in places AI systems

00:16:58.410 --> 00:17:01.370
<v Speaker 0>naturally read, like read me files or GitHub

00:17:01.370 --> 00:17:04.570
<v Speaker 0>issues. The AI sees the instruction and executes

00:17:04.570 --> 00:17:08.330
<v Speaker 0>them without realizing it's being manipulated. Anthropic has

00:17:08.330 --> 00:17:10.730
<v Speaker 0>patched all three issues in recent updates and

00:17:10.730 --> 00:17:15.745
<v Speaker 0>removed the vulnerable git init tool entirely. And

00:17:15.885 --> 00:17:19.485
<v Speaker 0>this is, that term we saw earlier, prompt

00:17:19.485 --> 00:17:24.205
<v Speaker 0>injection, and it's it's an early warning about

00:17:24.205 --> 00:17:25.885
<v Speaker 0>a new category of attacks we're gonna start

00:17:25.885 --> 00:17:29.424
<v Speaker 0>seeing more of, prompt injected through trusted sources.

00:17:30.310 --> 00:17:32.630
<v Speaker 0>As AI systems get more capable and connected

00:17:32.630 --> 00:17:36.170
<v Speaker 0>to real tools, attackers will embed malicious instructions

00:17:36.230 --> 00:17:38.570
<v Speaker 0>and documents the AI is likely to read.

00:17:38.710 --> 00:17:41.350
<v Speaker 0>It's like social engineering, but for the AI

00:17:41.350 --> 00:17:44.535
<v Speaker 0>themselves. If you're using AI coding assistance with

00:17:44.535 --> 00:17:47.735
<v Speaker 0>repository access, make sure you're running updated versions

00:17:47.735 --> 00:17:52.295
<v Speaker 0>of any MCP servers. So, yeah, it's it's

00:17:52.535 --> 00:17:55.770
<v Speaker 0>this is exactly what I meant when I

00:17:55.770 --> 00:17:59.530
<v Speaker 0>was talking about the, you know, the all

00:17:59.530 --> 00:18:01.770
<v Speaker 0>the code from those mole hub skills are

00:18:01.770 --> 00:18:04.490
<v Speaker 0>are are vetted as security trusted. So you

00:18:04.490 --> 00:18:06.570
<v Speaker 0>don't wanna just plug it in and and

00:18:06.570 --> 00:18:08.430
<v Speaker 0>and let it go in ham. You know?

00:18:08.490 --> 00:18:10.490
<v Speaker 0>There there needs to be some way to,

00:18:11.465 --> 00:18:17.565
<v Speaker 0>verify that these skills are actually, you know,

00:18:18.185 --> 00:18:20.345
<v Speaker 0>security safe, that they're not gonna steal your

00:18:20.345 --> 00:18:22.585
<v Speaker 0>data or they don't allow an attacker to

00:18:22.585 --> 00:18:25.110
<v Speaker 0>log in to your Google account. You know,

00:18:25.110 --> 00:18:27.990
<v Speaker 0>that's the real concern or whatever account you

00:18:27.990 --> 00:18:33.270
<v Speaker 0>use. You know? Vibe code and ransomware is

00:18:33.270 --> 00:18:36.550
<v Speaker 0>easier to crack because AI makes mistakes. This

00:18:36.550 --> 00:18:41.325
<v Speaker 0>article is from, dark reading dot com written

00:18:41.325 --> 00:18:46.765
<v Speaker 0>by Alexander Khalafi. But five coding is using

00:18:46.765 --> 00:18:49.165
<v Speaker 0>AI to write code based on natural language

00:18:49.165 --> 00:18:52.865
<v Speaker 0>descriptions rather than traditional programming. It's been democratizing

00:18:53.165 --> 00:18:57.100
<v Speaker 0>software development, but security researchers warned it would

00:18:57.100 --> 00:19:00.780
<v Speaker 0>also lower the barrier for malware creation. Now

00:19:00.780 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 0>we're seeing that with an unexpected silver lining.

00:19:05.740 --> 00:19:10.625
<v Speaker 0>So, security researchers have identified that ransomware being

00:19:10.625 --> 00:19:14.305
<v Speaker 0>created with AI systems, and it shows that

00:19:14.305 --> 00:19:18.485
<v Speaker 0>it's, you know, that they're not as cleverly

00:19:18.545 --> 00:19:25.520
<v Speaker 0>made as, you know, handmade, human made exploits.

00:19:27.419 --> 00:19:29.500
<v Speaker 0>And this is kind of interesting because you

00:19:29.500 --> 00:19:32.380
<v Speaker 0>would think that they're based on these same

00:19:32.380 --> 00:19:33.820
<v Speaker 0>exploits, but at the end of the day,

00:19:33.820 --> 00:19:38.154
<v Speaker 0>they're distilled down and don't and aren't able

00:19:38.154 --> 00:19:42.075
<v Speaker 0>to, you know, achieve the same granular detail

00:19:42.075 --> 00:19:44.715
<v Speaker 0>that, you know, an individual would working at

00:19:44.715 --> 00:19:51.429
<v Speaker 0>it for hours and hours. But a malicious

00:19:51.429 --> 00:19:54.710
<v Speaker 0>Versus code extension discovered recently included telltale signs

00:19:54.710 --> 00:19:58.970
<v Speaker 0>of AI generation, excessive comments explaining obvious functionality,

00:19:59.669 --> 00:20:03.610
<v Speaker 0>readme files with execution instructions, and placeholder variables.

00:20:04.405 --> 00:20:07.525
<v Speaker 0>Most embarrassingly, the extension accidentally included its own

00:20:07.525 --> 00:20:10.825
<v Speaker 0>decryption tools and command and control server keys.

00:20:15.125 --> 00:20:17.445
<v Speaker 0>Also, a note on the Sakari ransomware as

00:20:17.445 --> 00:20:20.380
<v Speaker 0>a a service operation shown signs of AI

00:20:20.380 --> 00:20:26.640
<v Speaker 0>generated code with technical inconsistencies. We're seeing instances

00:20:26.700 --> 00:20:29.260
<v Speaker 0>of hallucinations where the LLM will call it

00:20:29.260 --> 00:20:32.140
<v Speaker 0>readme dot t x t t, one researcher

00:20:32.140 --> 00:20:35.405
<v Speaker 0>noted. That's a mistake a threat actor would

00:20:35.405 --> 00:20:36.925
<v Speaker 0>never make, and this is kinda what I

00:20:36.925 --> 00:20:40.925
<v Speaker 0>mean. When you're there's there's a trade off

00:20:40.925 --> 00:20:46.780
<v Speaker 0>to using these generative tools where, to a

00:20:46.780 --> 00:20:49.100
<v Speaker 0>degree, you're really only getting the broad strokes

00:20:49.100 --> 00:20:51.840
<v Speaker 0>and and you fall under this this impression

00:20:51.900 --> 00:20:54.700
<v Speaker 0>or this guise that the granular details are

00:20:54.700 --> 00:21:00.275
<v Speaker 0>also being filled in. But these pattern matching

00:21:00.275 --> 00:21:05.555
<v Speaker 0>devices are not meant for that level of

00:21:05.555 --> 00:21:10.035
<v Speaker 0>granular detail unless specifically or directed to do

00:21:10.035 --> 00:21:19.530
<v Speaker 0>so. So that's so interesting. It's kinda funny

00:21:19.530 --> 00:21:21.289
<v Speaker 0>because the interest is articles fixing to see

00:21:21.289 --> 00:21:23.850
<v Speaker 0>it with the emerging Sakari ransomware should never

00:21:23.850 --> 00:21:26.575
<v Speaker 0>opt to pay up. The decryption process doesn't

00:21:26.575 --> 00:21:30.275
<v Speaker 0>work, likely a result of unskilled cybercriminal using

00:21:30.495 --> 00:21:34.575
<v Speaker 0>Vive coding to create it. And this really

00:21:34.575 --> 00:21:36.755
<v Speaker 0>does go back to, you know, you yes.

00:21:37.070 --> 00:21:39.950
<v Speaker 0>You can vibe code your way to an

00:21:39.950 --> 00:21:43.230
<v Speaker 0>amazing product maybe. But can you guarantee that

00:21:43.230 --> 00:21:45.730
<v Speaker 0>that product's gonna be secure? Can you guarantee

00:21:45.870 --> 00:21:48.429
<v Speaker 0>that, you know, the system is built in

00:21:48.429 --> 00:21:49.870
<v Speaker 0>such a way that it it it can

00:21:49.870 --> 00:21:52.855
<v Speaker 0>scale? And though these things are, to a

00:21:52.855 --> 00:21:54.615
<v Speaker 0>degree, out of your hand, you could even

00:21:54.615 --> 00:21:56.375
<v Speaker 0>type it in. Oh, make sure that this

00:21:56.375 --> 00:21:58.635
<v Speaker 0>scales. You know, you build this to scale.

00:22:00.215 --> 00:22:02.055
<v Speaker 0>But how do you know that it actually

00:22:02.055 --> 00:22:06.400
<v Speaker 0>does that? It's very, very much a black

00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:12.980
<v Speaker 0>box style of coding and to me, that

00:22:15.934 --> 00:22:18.335
<v Speaker 0>that seems a little bit, risky. You gotta

00:22:18.335 --> 00:22:20.655
<v Speaker 0>know what, what's going on with the code

00:22:20.655 --> 00:22:22.735
<v Speaker 0>that you're generating or the code that you're

00:22:22.735 --> 00:22:25.135
<v Speaker 0>writing. I I think that's where the value

00:22:25.135 --> 00:22:30.290
<v Speaker 0>is. So it's kinda counterintuitive, but AI seems

00:22:30.290 --> 00:22:34.610
<v Speaker 0>to be making malware worse, but criminals are

00:22:34.610 --> 00:22:36.950
<v Speaker 0>moving a lot faster now with AI generated

00:22:37.010 --> 00:22:39.010
<v Speaker 0>code and and they skip a lot more

00:22:39.010 --> 00:22:41.170
<v Speaker 0>of the validation that they they typically did

00:22:41.170 --> 00:22:44.865
<v Speaker 0>before, which ends up being amateur mistakes and

00:22:44.865 --> 00:22:47.205
<v Speaker 0>makes their malware easier to detect and defeat.

00:22:47.665 --> 00:22:50.065
<v Speaker 0>The decryption tool is being accidentally bundled. It

00:22:50.065 --> 00:22:55.350
<v Speaker 0>is is comical. It's just sad. That said,

00:22:55.350 --> 00:22:59.190
<v Speaker 0>it's likely a temporary advantage. Like this open

00:22:59.190 --> 00:23:01.030
<v Speaker 0>cloth thing, criminals will get better at quality

00:23:01.030 --> 00:23:03.910
<v Speaker 0>control. For now, vibe coated malware is often

00:23:03.910 --> 00:23:09.705
<v Speaker 0>its own worst enemy. So definitely keep an

00:23:09.705 --> 00:23:12.665
<v Speaker 0>eye out for, when this starts to ramp

00:23:12.665 --> 00:23:14.925
<v Speaker 0>up, but, you know, it's just the beginning.

00:23:15.145 --> 00:23:16.905
<v Speaker 0>Everyone was saying, okay. Well, it's just a

00:23:16.905 --> 00:23:19.305
<v Speaker 0>chatbot. Well, now we got open claw, which

00:23:19.305 --> 00:23:21.965
<v Speaker 0>is it's just a life assistant. You know?

00:23:24.350 --> 00:23:29.230
<v Speaker 0>Alright. Another, Claude article. Claude Co gets task

00:23:29.230 --> 00:23:34.270
<v Speaker 0>updates for longer agent work sessions. So this

00:23:34.270 --> 00:23:37.170
<v Speaker 0>one is written by Carl Franzen on VentureBeat.

00:23:37.870 --> 00:23:41.045
<v Speaker 0>Thanks, Carl. AI coding assistants have been getting

00:23:41.045 --> 00:23:43.545
<v Speaker 0>more capable, but they've had a fundamental limitation,

00:23:43.845 --> 00:23:46.325
<v Speaker 0>working memory. And if anyone's ever worked with,

00:23:46.325 --> 00:23:50.005
<v Speaker 0>you know, these AI coding tools, you'll know

00:23:50.005 --> 00:23:52.425
<v Speaker 0>that every so often, they'll do that interesting,

00:23:53.205 --> 00:23:59.360
<v Speaker 0>compacting conversation thing, that destroys any sort of

00:23:59.360 --> 00:24:04.080
<v Speaker 0>flow that you had, going previously. I honestly

00:24:04.080 --> 00:24:08.365
<v Speaker 0>think that keeping your context is worse. It's

00:24:08.365 --> 00:24:10.845
<v Speaker 0>it's worse than than clearing it after every

00:24:10.845 --> 00:24:14.845
<v Speaker 0>task. And this it it might sound wasteful

00:24:14.845 --> 00:24:19.105
<v Speaker 0>because you to a degree, the system needs

00:24:19.804 --> 00:24:23.680
<v Speaker 0>to reassess and and reevaluate the code. But

00:24:23.680 --> 00:24:26.500
<v Speaker 0>at the same time, it prevents it from

00:24:27.600 --> 00:24:30.400
<v Speaker 0>straying from the granular details, you know, the

00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:37.424
<v Speaker 0>granular instructions that you've provided. You know? So

00:24:37.645 --> 00:24:40.304
<v Speaker 0>there's a, a term for it. It's like

00:24:41.404 --> 00:24:45.745
<v Speaker 0>string string from the path or whatever. But

00:24:47.870 --> 00:24:49.870
<v Speaker 0>it's yeah. But this has been a very

00:24:49.870 --> 00:24:53.490
<v Speaker 0>frustrating part of operating with these tools. And

00:24:53.870 --> 00:24:56.610
<v Speaker 0>when an AI agent operates purely on conversation,

00:24:56.830 --> 00:25:00.030
<v Speaker 0>it lacks structural permanence. It knows what to

00:25:00.030 --> 00:25:03.105
<v Speaker 0>do, but often forgets why it's doing it

00:25:03.245 --> 00:25:06.445
<v Speaker 0>or in what order. So it's it's that's

00:25:06.445 --> 00:25:09.245
<v Speaker 0>fine for small fixes, but really frustrating when

00:25:09.245 --> 00:25:12.065
<v Speaker 0>you're working on larger product projects. You know?

00:25:13.965 --> 00:25:16.544
<v Speaker 0>So a feature that you might have implemented

00:25:16.765 --> 00:25:20.480
<v Speaker 0>in, let's say, an example. You know, you

00:25:20.480 --> 00:25:23.520
<v Speaker 0>have a a uploader that manually works by,

00:25:23.520 --> 00:25:25.600
<v Speaker 0>you know, you do upload the file that

00:25:25.600 --> 00:25:28.640
<v Speaker 0>you download online. But the company that you

00:25:28.640 --> 00:25:30.865
<v Speaker 0>work with, they make a change where it

00:25:30.865 --> 00:25:33.424
<v Speaker 0>syncs automatically to the website you you download

00:25:33.424 --> 00:25:36.705
<v Speaker 0>from. Great. That's fantastic. But now for some

00:25:36.705 --> 00:25:38.705
<v Speaker 0>reason when it syncs, there's a field that

00:25:38.705 --> 00:25:40.784
<v Speaker 0>doesn't get updated like it does when you

00:25:40.784 --> 00:25:45.070
<v Speaker 0>uploaded the paper. And, you know, typically this

00:25:45.070 --> 00:25:47.789
<v Speaker 0>is a developer mistake, but now with these

00:25:47.789 --> 00:25:50.750
<v Speaker 0>Vibe Coding tools, this is, like, just something

00:25:50.750 --> 00:25:53.870
<v Speaker 0>that was glossed over in the transition. It's

00:25:53.950 --> 00:25:56.830
<v Speaker 0>and and if you didn't look to make

00:25:56.830 --> 00:25:59.945
<v Speaker 0>sure all these features were implemented or that

00:25:59.945 --> 00:26:04.105
<v Speaker 0>all these granular details were moved over or

00:26:04.105 --> 00:26:08.985
<v Speaker 0>these, how do you put encoded behaviors, you

00:26:08.985 --> 00:26:11.970
<v Speaker 0>know, the semantics of the actual code, if

00:26:11.970 --> 00:26:13.890
<v Speaker 0>those weren't brought over as well, then it

00:26:13.890 --> 00:26:16.210
<v Speaker 0>doesn't know it it doesn't know to do

00:26:16.210 --> 00:26:18.929
<v Speaker 0>that. It doesn't know to read into that.

00:26:18.929 --> 00:26:24.210
<v Speaker 0>And the memory being reset or, you know,

00:26:24.210 --> 00:26:28.154
<v Speaker 0>having a limited working memory is often the

00:26:28.154 --> 00:26:33.054
<v Speaker 0>biggest, like, reason why this has to, why

00:26:33.115 --> 00:26:35.274
<v Speaker 0>why why this is a drawback or why

00:26:35.274 --> 00:26:38.575
<v Speaker 0>why it's holding us back. You know? So

00:26:39.049 --> 00:26:41.210
<v Speaker 0>Cloud Code v two point one one six

00:26:41.210 --> 00:26:43.450
<v Speaker 0>introduced a new task system replacing the old

00:26:43.450 --> 00:26:45.850
<v Speaker 0>to do list with something more robust. The

00:26:45.850 --> 00:26:48.809
<v Speaker 0>key difference, tasks support dependency graphs. Task three

00:26:48.809 --> 00:26:50.570
<v Speaker 0>can't start until task one and task two

00:26:50.570 --> 00:26:53.245
<v Speaker 0>complete. Preventing the AI from trying to test

00:26:53.245 --> 00:26:55.485
<v Speaker 0>code it hasn't written yet. Tasks are written

00:26:55.485 --> 00:26:57.405
<v Speaker 0>to your local file system, so they survive

00:26:57.405 --> 00:27:00.125
<v Speaker 0>crashes and can be version controlled. Multiple cloud

00:27:00.125 --> 00:27:02.385
<v Speaker 0>sessions can share the same task list, enabling

00:27:02.445 --> 00:27:05.500
<v Speaker 0>patterns like writer reviewer where one session writes

00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:07.420
<v Speaker 0>code and another reviews it in a clean

00:27:07.420 --> 00:27:10.540
<v Speaker 0>context. Recent patches fixed out of memory crashes

00:27:10.540 --> 00:27:15.020
<v Speaker 0>and added headless mode for CICD integration. And

00:27:15.020 --> 00:27:17.980
<v Speaker 0>headless mode is another fun little tool that

00:27:17.980 --> 00:27:22.225
<v Speaker 0>you can use because, technically, you can run

00:27:22.225 --> 00:27:27.265
<v Speaker 0>Claude as a command line, prompt that which

00:27:27.265 --> 00:27:28.705
<v Speaker 0>which would you don't have to open the

00:27:28.705 --> 00:27:31.365
<v Speaker 0>TUI. You can you can prompt it, headlessly.

00:27:31.985 --> 00:27:34.920
<v Speaker 0>And if you have a script that you,

00:27:34.920 --> 00:27:37.020
<v Speaker 0>you know, maybe say you pull a document

00:27:37.240 --> 00:27:39.800
<v Speaker 0>automated, you have a automated document that you

00:27:39.800 --> 00:27:42.060
<v Speaker 0>pull from online, and you have a script

00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:48.774
<v Speaker 0>that calls your automated, you know, Claude, in

00:27:48.774 --> 00:27:51.335
<v Speaker 0>headless mode, which with it's a prompt you

00:27:51.335 --> 00:27:53.095
<v Speaker 0>already saved in your code, you know, and

00:27:53.095 --> 00:27:56.455
<v Speaker 0>you just have to exec that, and you

00:27:56.615 --> 00:27:59.575
<v Speaker 0>you'll have an output automate automatically. So I

00:27:59.575 --> 00:28:02.235
<v Speaker 0>use this to generate sentiment on certain things,

00:28:04.870 --> 00:28:07.030
<v Speaker 0>which I I find fantastic. You know? It's

00:28:07.030 --> 00:28:09.510
<v Speaker 0>a one liner, very limited amount of token

00:28:09.510 --> 00:28:11.830
<v Speaker 0>use, and I think it's a very clever

00:28:11.830 --> 00:28:18.195
<v Speaker 0>way to, yeah, understand sentiment overall of larger

00:28:18.195 --> 00:28:20.215
<v Speaker 0>pieces of works before you get into it.

00:28:23.075 --> 00:28:26.370
<v Speaker 0>But this is kinda cool. Claude is moving

00:28:26.770 --> 00:28:29.730
<v Speaker 0>copilot to project manager, and I did see

00:28:29.730 --> 00:28:32.210
<v Speaker 0>another tool called Tracer AI, which was more

00:28:32.210 --> 00:28:36.690
<v Speaker 0>of a project manager style system. But the

00:28:36.690 --> 00:28:39.410
<v Speaker 0>the persistence seems to be where we're we're

00:28:39.410 --> 00:28:41.990
<v Speaker 0>losing out, and and they're starting to recognize

00:28:42.255 --> 00:28:46.095
<v Speaker 0>this, you know. Before clearing context to free

00:28:46.095 --> 00:28:48.815
<v Speaker 0>up tokens meant losing the plan, but now

00:28:48.815 --> 00:28:50.655
<v Speaker 0>the plan lives on disk so you can

00:28:50.655 --> 00:28:53.795
<v Speaker 0>aggressively manage context without losing your road map.

00:28:54.095 --> 00:28:56.995
<v Speaker 0>For enterprises, the plan becomes an audible artifact.

00:28:57.400 --> 00:28:59.480
<v Speaker 0>For individuals, you can shut down your terminals,

00:28:59.480 --> 00:29:01.480
<v Speaker 0>switch machines, or recover from a crash, and

00:29:01.480 --> 00:29:07.559
<v Speaker 0>pick up exactly where you left off. This

00:29:07.559 --> 00:29:11.875
<v Speaker 0>is kinda cool. I was already doing something

00:29:11.875 --> 00:29:16.755
<v Speaker 0>similar to this through something I call, well,

00:29:16.755 --> 00:29:19.655
<v Speaker 0>Claude has these command skills that you can

00:29:22.115 --> 00:29:26.490
<v Speaker 0>use to have it run through specific, instructions

00:29:26.490 --> 00:29:29.130
<v Speaker 0>that you set up ahead of time. And

00:29:29.130 --> 00:29:31.850
<v Speaker 0>I have this workflow instruction that allow you

00:29:31.850 --> 00:29:35.470
<v Speaker 0>know, does a little bit of research, documents

00:29:35.530 --> 00:29:38.890
<v Speaker 0>all of its findings, you know, and then

00:29:38.890 --> 00:29:41.815
<v Speaker 0>derives, you know, a plan based on those

00:29:41.815 --> 00:29:44.294
<v Speaker 0>findings. And then, you know, I tend to

00:29:44.294 --> 00:29:47.355
<v Speaker 0>go back and forth on those, plans before

00:29:47.414 --> 00:29:49.975
<v Speaker 0>trying them out, but it's been kind of

00:29:49.975 --> 00:29:52.375
<v Speaker 0>a fun thing to try out with, my

00:29:52.375 --> 00:29:55.040
<v Speaker 0>personal project that I've been building up, over

00:29:55.040 --> 00:30:00.960
<v Speaker 0>the last few months. But, yeah, pretty awesome

00:30:00.960 --> 00:30:03.679
<v Speaker 0>stuff. I think, this this is definitely heading

00:30:03.679 --> 00:30:06.179
<v Speaker 0>in the right direction for the coding agents,

00:30:07.924 --> 00:30:11.125
<v Speaker 0>because the memory is definitely currently the biggest

00:30:11.125 --> 00:30:14.985
<v Speaker 0>limitation. More cloud code stuff. Cloud code teleport.

00:30:15.284 --> 00:30:17.945
<v Speaker 0>Remove your coding sessions between web and terminal

00:30:18.005 --> 00:30:20.485
<v Speaker 0>terminal. You can see where my my articles

00:30:20.485 --> 00:30:21.605
<v Speaker 0>are at. I guess I'm just getting a

00:30:21.605 --> 00:30:23.970
<v Speaker 0>lot of cloud stuff right now. Especially with

00:30:23.970 --> 00:30:25.890
<v Speaker 0>the OpenClaw stuff, I can kinda see why

00:30:25.890 --> 00:30:28.210
<v Speaker 0>this is happening. Cloud Code has kind of

00:30:28.210 --> 00:30:36.485
<v Speaker 0>been the the reigning, you know, code generation

00:30:36.705 --> 00:30:41.425
<v Speaker 0>tool amongst all of the different, available, you

00:30:41.425 --> 00:30:44.065
<v Speaker 0>know, between Gemini and OpenAI and whatnot. It

00:30:44.065 --> 00:30:46.225
<v Speaker 0>seems that Cloud Code's the most popular and

00:30:46.225 --> 00:30:49.929
<v Speaker 0>always has the highest scoring on the, you

00:30:49.929 --> 00:30:52.889
<v Speaker 0>know, the those, like, test ratings. So it's

00:30:52.889 --> 00:30:58.330
<v Speaker 0>kinda interesting more and more to see, more

00:30:58.330 --> 00:31:02.375
<v Speaker 0>Claude articles coming up, especially in my my

00:31:02.375 --> 00:31:06.135
<v Speaker 0>little feed that I use to hunt for

00:31:06.135 --> 00:31:11.255
<v Speaker 0>articles. But, this is from Hacker Noon written

00:31:11.255 --> 00:31:16.990
<v Speaker 0>by Ladislav Guzzi. One frustration with AI coding

00:31:16.990 --> 00:31:20.430
<v Speaker 0>tools has been, again, context switching. Start a

00:31:20.430 --> 00:31:22.190
<v Speaker 0>conversation on the web, realize you need to

00:31:22.190 --> 00:31:25.790
<v Speaker 0>work locally, and you're essentially starting over, or

00:31:25.790 --> 00:31:27.790
<v Speaker 0>you're on your laptop, get interrupted, and wish

00:31:27.790 --> 00:31:30.095
<v Speaker 0>you could pick up on another machine. Cloud

00:31:30.095 --> 00:31:33.135
<v Speaker 0>Code's new teleport feature lets developers transfer entire

00:31:33.135 --> 00:31:36.895
<v Speaker 0>coding sessions, including conversation history context and the

00:31:36.895 --> 00:31:41.295
<v Speaker 0>working branch between web and local environments. Using

00:31:41.295 --> 00:31:44.255
<v Speaker 0>an ampersand prefix sends a task to Cloud

00:31:44.255 --> 00:31:47.870
<v Speaker 0>Code's cloud where it continues running even after

00:31:47.870 --> 00:31:50.510
<v Speaker 0>you close your editor. The teleport command pulls

00:31:50.510 --> 00:31:52.910
<v Speaker 0>web sessions back to your local terminal. You

00:31:52.910 --> 00:31:55.330
<v Speaker 0>can share session IDs with teammates for asynchronous

00:31:55.470 --> 00:31:59.185
<v Speaker 0>pair programming. The catch, it's one way only.

00:31:59.405 --> 00:32:01.485
<v Speaker 0>You can pull web sessions locally, but can't

00:32:01.485 --> 00:32:05.085
<v Speaker 0>push existing local sessions to the web. And

00:32:05.085 --> 00:32:07.485
<v Speaker 0>it looks like this requires GitHub integration and

00:32:07.485 --> 00:32:09.660
<v Speaker 0>a clean git skate git Git Slate. You

00:32:09.740 --> 00:32:11.580
<v Speaker 0>know, it's funny because this sounds like something

00:32:11.580 --> 00:32:17.820
<v Speaker 0>that OpenClaw would already do. So now it

00:32:17.820 --> 00:32:20.620
<v Speaker 0>seems like it's it's tough because so Anthropic

00:32:20.620 --> 00:32:22.780
<v Speaker 0>has to build not only the tool that

00:32:22.780 --> 00:32:25.100
<v Speaker 0>drives it, but also they have to improve

00:32:25.100 --> 00:32:27.075
<v Speaker 0>their wrapper, right, which in this case is

00:32:27.075 --> 00:32:31.895
<v Speaker 0>Claude Cook. But OpenClaus is gets to benefit

00:32:31.955 --> 00:32:34.355
<v Speaker 0>off of all their improvements and just has

00:32:34.355 --> 00:32:38.275
<v Speaker 0>to improve their wrapper. So you can see

00:32:38.275 --> 00:32:44.700
<v Speaker 0>where the, requirement difference is in terms of,

00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:47.020
<v Speaker 0>you know, these businesses and how they're meeting

00:32:47.020 --> 00:32:51.580
<v Speaker 0>people's needs. But if you don't wanna use

00:32:51.580 --> 00:32:54.400
<v Speaker 0>open clause, definitely solves a real workflow problem

00:32:54.780 --> 00:32:57.665
<v Speaker 0>for people. You can start complex work on

00:32:57.665 --> 00:32:59.425
<v Speaker 0>the web during the commute and teleport it

00:32:59.425 --> 00:33:01.825
<v Speaker 0>to your workstation when you arrive, hand off

00:33:01.825 --> 00:33:03.425
<v Speaker 0>a session to a colleague in a different

00:33:03.425 --> 00:33:05.665
<v Speaker 0>time zone, like compute heavy work running the

00:33:05.665 --> 00:33:08.200
<v Speaker 0>cloud while you're working on things locally. The

00:33:08.200 --> 00:33:11.720
<v Speaker 0>one way limitation is notable. And try Anthropic

00:33:11.720 --> 00:33:14.200
<v Speaker 0>likely wants to ensure code integrity through through

00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:18.760
<v Speaker 0>Git, but it's still, like, meaningful towards, like,

00:33:18.760 --> 00:33:22.205
<v Speaker 0>a portable AI assisted development. I still think

00:33:22.205 --> 00:33:24.285
<v Speaker 0>OpenCloud might be a better solution this than

00:33:24.285 --> 00:33:30.545
<v Speaker 0>this, though. Alright. More AI. Google expands Gemini

00:33:30.605 --> 00:33:33.485
<v Speaker 0>API with a hundred megabyte file limits and

00:33:33.485 --> 00:33:39.010
<v Speaker 0>cloud storage integration. This is from Chrome Unboxed

00:33:39.070 --> 00:33:43.230
<v Speaker 0>written by Robbie Payne. Building AI applications that

00:33:43.230 --> 00:33:46.270
<v Speaker 0>handle documents, images, and videos has meant dealing

00:33:46.270 --> 00:33:49.010
<v Speaker 0>with file size restrictions. And, you know, developers

00:33:49.070 --> 00:33:52.605
<v Speaker 0>often had to preprocess content, split large files,

00:33:52.985 --> 00:33:55.545
<v Speaker 0>or build complex workarounds just to feed data

00:33:55.545 --> 00:33:59.385
<v Speaker 0>to AI models. But Google increased the Gemini

00:33:59.385 --> 00:34:02.985
<v Speaker 0>API's inline file size from twenty megabytes to

00:34:02.985 --> 00:34:06.750
<v Speaker 0>a hundred megabytes, a fivefold increase allowing developers

00:34:06.810 --> 00:34:10.090
<v Speaker 0>to send high resolution images, extended audio clips,

00:34:10.090 --> 00:34:15.050
<v Speaker 0>and complex PDFs directly without intermediate storage. New

00:34:15.050 --> 00:34:17.690
<v Speaker 0>integration with Google Cloud Storage lets developers register

00:34:17.690 --> 00:34:20.845
<v Speaker 0>files once and reference them across multiple requests.

00:34:21.625 --> 00:34:24.665
<v Speaker 0>The API also now supports fetching content via

00:34:24.665 --> 00:34:28.744
<v Speaker 0>HTTPS and signed URLs from competing platforms like

00:34:28.744 --> 00:34:32.799
<v Speaker 0>AWS s three or Azure Blob Storage. These

00:34:32.799 --> 00:34:35.520
<v Speaker 0>capabilities run on Gemini three models designed for

00:34:35.520 --> 00:34:40.640
<v Speaker 0>complex reasoning across large multimodal inputs. So I

00:34:40.640 --> 00:34:42.480
<v Speaker 0>guess if any of you are developers building

00:34:42.480 --> 00:34:45.119
<v Speaker 0>AI applications, this might remove some of your

00:34:45.119 --> 00:34:48.325
<v Speaker 0>friction. You now feed an AI a forty

00:34:48.325 --> 00:34:50.404
<v Speaker 0>five minute video or a hundred paid document

00:34:50.404 --> 00:34:55.865
<v Speaker 0>directly. And maybe, I guess, it just runs

00:34:56.244 --> 00:35:03.420
<v Speaker 0>on that. I guess, maybe this might be

00:35:03.420 --> 00:35:06.060
<v Speaker 0>a little more valuable if you're uploading a

00:35:06.060 --> 00:35:10.480
<v Speaker 0>lot of, I don't know, high level documentation

00:35:11.020 --> 00:35:13.600
<v Speaker 0>with tons of detail. I I really wonder,

00:35:13.660 --> 00:35:19.775
<v Speaker 0>you know, But this could also be real

00:35:20.015 --> 00:35:23.295
<v Speaker 0>really good for maybe, like, complex reasoning across,

00:35:23.295 --> 00:35:27.135
<v Speaker 0>like, large reports or many, many reports so

00:35:27.135 --> 00:35:30.000
<v Speaker 0>you could, you know, put more a larger

00:35:30.000 --> 00:35:33.060
<v Speaker 0>report or a larger time frame report in

00:35:33.200 --> 00:35:38.740
<v Speaker 0>to be analyzed rather than twenty megabytes worth.

00:35:39.360 --> 00:35:41.385
<v Speaker 0>So I don't know. This sounds like a

00:35:41.385 --> 00:35:44.125
<v Speaker 0>nice bonus for anyone that uses Gemini API.

00:35:45.705 --> 00:35:49.785
<v Speaker 0>Another Gemini fun bit, from the Google AI

00:35:49.785 --> 00:35:57.330
<v Speaker 0>blog, written by Rohan Doshi. Google launches agentic

00:35:57.330 --> 00:35:59.810
<v Speaker 0>vision in Gemini three flash. Oh, yeah. Yeah.

00:35:59.810 --> 00:36:02.530
<v Speaker 0>This this one is kind of cool. When

00:36:02.530 --> 00:36:04.450
<v Speaker 0>AI looks at an image today, it typically

00:36:04.450 --> 00:36:06.690
<v Speaker 0>describes what it sees in a single pass.

00:36:06.690 --> 00:36:09.090
<v Speaker 0>It's like glancing at a photo versus actually

00:36:09.090 --> 00:36:11.905
<v Speaker 0>studying it. But some tasks, like reading dense

00:36:11.905 --> 00:36:15.845
<v Speaker 0>tables, checking architectural plans, or analyzing detailed diagrams,

00:36:16.145 --> 00:36:19.825
<v Speaker 0>need more than a quick look. Google's new

00:36:19.825 --> 00:36:23.365
<v Speaker 0>agentic vision capability capability in Gemini three Flash

00:36:23.570 --> 00:36:27.170
<v Speaker 0>treats image understanding as an active investigation rather

00:36:27.170 --> 00:36:30.450
<v Speaker 0>than a single observation. The model can formulate

00:36:30.450 --> 00:36:33.830
<v Speaker 0>plans to zoom in, inspect, and manipulate images

00:36:33.970 --> 00:36:36.690
<v Speaker 0>step by step using Python code execution to

00:36:36.690 --> 00:36:40.755
<v Speaker 0>draw on images, parse tables, and visualize data.

00:36:42.015 --> 00:36:45.215
<v Speaker 0>This think, act, observe loop lets AI ground

00:36:45.215 --> 00:36:48.435
<v Speaker 0>its answers in visual evidence rather than guessing.

00:36:48.975 --> 00:36:51.535
<v Speaker 0>Testing shows a consistent five to ten percent

00:36:51.535 --> 00:36:55.050
<v Speaker 0>quality improvement across vision benchmarks. One company using

00:36:55.050 --> 00:36:58.330
<v Speaker 0>it for building plan validation improved accuracy by

00:36:58.330 --> 00:37:02.410
<v Speaker 0>five percent just by enabling code execution, and

00:37:02.410 --> 00:37:06.345
<v Speaker 0>that's for the, Python scripts there. And this

00:37:06.345 --> 00:37:08.985
<v Speaker 0>is AI that can actually study an image

00:37:08.985 --> 00:37:12.025
<v Speaker 0>rather than describe it. It's it's let you

00:37:12.025 --> 00:37:15.325
<v Speaker 0>know, this this takes away the the opportunity

00:37:15.865 --> 00:37:18.744
<v Speaker 0>for it to hallucinate. It builds more context

00:37:18.744 --> 00:37:20.585
<v Speaker 0>grounded in the image it's looking at. You

00:37:20.585 --> 00:37:22.460
<v Speaker 0>know what I mean? So if if you

00:37:22.460 --> 00:37:24.559
<v Speaker 0>ask it to count items in a complex

00:37:24.619 --> 00:37:26.700
<v Speaker 0>photo, it can write code to mark each

00:37:26.700 --> 00:37:29.740
<v Speaker 0>one as it counts. If you need data

00:37:29.740 --> 00:37:31.980
<v Speaker 0>extracted from a messy table, you can use

00:37:31.980 --> 00:37:35.040
<v Speaker 0>Python to process it systematically rather than guessing.

00:37:35.565 --> 00:37:38.685
<v Speaker 0>The practical impact, fewer hallucinations when AI deals

00:37:38.685 --> 00:37:41.885
<v Speaker 0>with visual information that requires careful attention to

00:37:41.885 --> 00:37:50.480
<v Speaker 0>detail. On to the next article. Researchers claim

00:37:50.480 --> 00:37:55.120
<v Speaker 0>LLMs will never truly be intelligent. Tech leaders

00:37:55.120 --> 00:37:56.960
<v Speaker 0>keep promising that if we just scale language

00:37:56.960 --> 00:38:00.080
<v Speaker 0>models big enough, we'll we'll achieve artificial generated

00:38:00.080 --> 00:38:03.155
<v Speaker 0>intelligence. Billions of dollars are being invested on

00:38:03.155 --> 00:38:05.875
<v Speaker 0>this premise, but not everyone's convinced. So this

00:38:05.875 --> 00:38:08.115
<v Speaker 0>article, just to be clear, is not yet,

00:38:08.355 --> 00:38:11.895
<v Speaker 0>peer reviewed, but I think it gives a

00:38:13.839 --> 00:38:17.839
<v Speaker 0>interesting context or interesting perspective into why, you

00:38:17.839 --> 00:38:20.320
<v Speaker 0>know, the the research being done to to

00:38:20.320 --> 00:38:24.480
<v Speaker 0>prove that, you know, LLMs are not they

00:38:24.480 --> 00:38:26.560
<v Speaker 0>may seem close to what we what we're

00:38:26.560 --> 00:38:30.765
<v Speaker 0>trying to achieve, but but this researcher is

00:38:30.765 --> 00:38:33.565
<v Speaker 0>convinced that it is not gonna lead to

00:38:33.565 --> 00:38:38.365
<v Speaker 0>AGI. So Benjamin Riley is the name of

00:38:38.365 --> 00:38:40.765
<v Speaker 0>the researcher, but this article from futurism is

00:38:40.765 --> 00:38:45.010
<v Speaker 0>written by Frank Landy Moore. But Benjamin Riley,

00:38:45.010 --> 00:38:48.609
<v Speaker 0>cofounder of Cognitive Resonance, argues that language and

00:38:48.609 --> 00:38:53.089
<v Speaker 0>intelligence are fundamentally separate cognitive functions. His core

00:38:53.089 --> 00:38:56.849
<v Speaker 0>claim, human thinking is largely independent of human

00:38:56.849 --> 00:38:59.655
<v Speaker 0>language. He points to neuroscience research showing that

00:38:59.655 --> 00:39:02.455
<v Speaker 0>people who lose language abilities retain the cap

00:39:02.695 --> 00:39:06.855
<v Speaker 0>capacity to solve math problems, understand emotions, and

00:39:06.855 --> 00:39:10.455
<v Speaker 0>reason about the world. LLMs, he argues, merely

00:39:10.455 --> 00:39:15.430
<v Speaker 0>simulate communicate communicative patterns rather than actually thinking

00:39:15.650 --> 00:39:19.490
<v Speaker 0>correct. Research on AI creativity suggests these systems

00:39:19.490 --> 00:39:23.830
<v Speaker 0>hit inherent ceilings, producing formulaic rather than truly

00:39:23.890 --> 00:39:27.545
<v Speaker 0>novel outputs. Even Yan LeCun, one of the

00:39:27.545 --> 00:39:30.665
<v Speaker 0>pioneers of modern AI, disputes that scaling the

00:39:30.665 --> 00:39:35.885
<v Speaker 0>LLMs will lead to AGI, advocating instead for

00:39:35.944 --> 00:39:41.250
<v Speaker 0>alternative world model approaches. I am on this

00:39:41.250 --> 00:39:44.950
<v Speaker 0>boat as well. At this point in time,

00:39:45.250 --> 00:39:48.630
<v Speaker 0>I do believe that we are merely being

00:39:48.930 --> 00:39:51.330
<v Speaker 0>fooled into believing that we are seeing some

00:39:51.330 --> 00:39:55.875
<v Speaker 0>sort of intelligence. But, again, the data proves

00:39:55.934 --> 00:40:02.355
<v Speaker 0>that this is merely pattern matching system, and

00:40:02.414 --> 00:40:05.934
<v Speaker 0>we need to keep that in our minds

00:40:05.934 --> 00:40:08.174
<v Speaker 0>as we use these tools that, you know,

00:40:08.174 --> 00:40:13.990
<v Speaker 0>that we do not personify them. So I

00:40:13.990 --> 00:40:15.690
<v Speaker 0>feel like this is a pretty good counterweight

00:40:15.830 --> 00:40:17.670
<v Speaker 0>to a lot of the AGI hype. I'm

00:40:17.670 --> 00:40:21.830
<v Speaker 0>hoping that, you know, that this idea or

00:40:21.830 --> 00:40:26.635
<v Speaker 0>belief picks up more steam and and becomes

00:40:26.635 --> 00:40:29.035
<v Speaker 0>grounded in more empirical data. That's that's that's

00:40:29.035 --> 00:40:30.795
<v Speaker 0>the important part, you know, rather than it

00:40:30.795 --> 00:40:33.915
<v Speaker 0>being a belief that it's a fact. And

00:40:33.915 --> 00:40:36.474
<v Speaker 0>the question isn't whether LMS are useful. They

00:40:36.474 --> 00:40:39.030
<v Speaker 0>they are. The question is whether making them

00:40:39.030 --> 00:40:42.390
<v Speaker 0>bigger will eventually produce genuine intelligence. And you

00:40:42.390 --> 00:40:44.310
<v Speaker 0>think about the amount of scaling we're doing

00:40:44.310 --> 00:40:46.550
<v Speaker 0>in some of these states in terms of,

00:40:46.950 --> 00:40:53.445
<v Speaker 0>megawatts. So I don't know. Riley's argument suggests

00:40:53.445 --> 00:40:56.505
<v Speaker 0>that we might be optimizing the wrong thing.

00:40:56.645 --> 00:40:59.525
<v Speaker 0>Language is a communication tool, not a thinking

00:40:59.525 --> 00:41:02.185
<v Speaker 0>tool. That doesn't mean AI progress will stop,

00:41:02.250 --> 00:41:03.850
<v Speaker 0>but it might mean the path to more

00:41:03.850 --> 00:41:08.090
<v Speaker 0>capable AI runs through fundamentally different architectures, not

00:41:08.090 --> 00:41:12.090
<v Speaker 0>just bigger language models. I would be interested

00:41:12.090 --> 00:41:21.545
<v Speaker 0>to see where this goes. Let's move on.

00:41:21.545 --> 00:41:24.424
<v Speaker 0>I think, I got another few for you

00:41:24.424 --> 00:41:26.664
<v Speaker 0>folks here. I actually pretty much loaded up

00:41:26.664 --> 00:41:29.085
<v Speaker 0>today on on a ton of articles. So,

00:41:29.619 --> 00:41:31.940
<v Speaker 0>you can see I've been stockpiling for a

00:41:31.940 --> 00:41:35.300
<v Speaker 0>little while, I guess, but paper claims AI

00:41:35.300 --> 00:41:40.740
<v Speaker 0>agents are mathematically limited in complex tasks. So

00:41:40.740 --> 00:41:47.135
<v Speaker 0>this is another, AI limitational of paper I

00:41:47.135 --> 00:41:50.495
<v Speaker 0>found on futurism, written, again, by Frankie Landy

00:41:50.495 --> 00:41:52.575
<v Speaker 0>Moore or Frank Landy Moore. So you you

00:41:52.815 --> 00:41:54.655
<v Speaker 0>I think Frank's on the same side as

00:41:54.655 --> 00:41:57.455
<v Speaker 0>me. We don't think that that that is

00:41:57.455 --> 00:41:59.695
<v Speaker 0>coming to AGI since they they've got two

00:41:59.695 --> 00:42:03.430
<v Speaker 0>papers now. But AI agents systems that can

00:42:03.430 --> 00:42:05.510
<v Speaker 0>take actions rather than just generate text are

00:42:05.510 --> 00:42:08.230
<v Speaker 0>being deployed for everything from customer service to

00:42:08.230 --> 00:42:11.030
<v Speaker 0>software development. Companies are betting they can replace

00:42:11.030 --> 00:42:14.470
<v Speaker 0>human workers. But, you know, how reliable are

00:42:14.470 --> 00:42:17.635
<v Speaker 0>they? A non peer reviewed paper by Vishal

00:42:18.335 --> 00:42:21.315
<v Speaker 0>Sikka and his son claims to be mathematically

00:42:22.815 --> 00:42:26.575
<v Speaker 0>claims to mathematically demonstrate that large language models

00:42:26.575 --> 00:42:30.520
<v Speaker 0>are incapable of carrying out computational and agentic

00:42:30.579 --> 00:42:33.780
<v Speaker 0>tasks beyond a certain complexity, and that threshold

00:42:33.780 --> 00:42:35.859
<v Speaker 0>is surprisingly low. Okay. So it seems like

00:42:35.859 --> 00:42:39.700
<v Speaker 0>I confused the two articles because this is

00:42:39.700 --> 00:42:42.660
<v Speaker 0>the one with the non peer reviewed, paper

00:42:42.660 --> 00:42:45.300
<v Speaker 0>rather than the previous one by Frank Landy

00:42:45.300 --> 00:42:49.275
<v Speaker 0>Moore. Whoops. Sorry about that, guys. But the

00:42:49.275 --> 00:42:52.495
<v Speaker 0>paper points to real world failures. Companies deploying

00:42:52.635 --> 00:42:55.435
<v Speaker 0>AI agents for workforce reduction discovered the system

00:42:55.435 --> 00:42:59.195
<v Speaker 0>couldn't adequately replace human workers due to frequent

00:42:59.195 --> 00:43:02.779
<v Speaker 0>errors. OpenAI research has conceded that AI hallucinations

00:43:03.079 --> 00:43:06.619
<v Speaker 0>remain pervasive and that model accuracy will never

00:43:06.680 --> 00:43:10.039
<v Speaker 0>reach a hundred percent. Sitka argues AI agents

00:43:10.039 --> 00:43:13.645
<v Speaker 0>cannot safely operate in high stakes environments, Those

00:43:13.645 --> 00:43:17.405
<v Speaker 0>supplementary components built around LLMs might overcome pure

00:43:17.405 --> 00:43:22.205
<v Speaker 0>model limitations. So but, yeah, take this with

00:43:22.205 --> 00:43:25.005
<v Speaker 0>a grain of salt. The claims are pretty

00:43:25.005 --> 00:43:26.829
<v Speaker 0>strong in this paper, but it it aligns

00:43:26.829 --> 00:43:28.670
<v Speaker 0>with what many people are seeing, like, in

00:43:28.670 --> 00:43:30.910
<v Speaker 0>practice that AI agents work great for some

00:43:30.910 --> 00:43:33.710
<v Speaker 0>task and and just, you know, they just

00:43:33.710 --> 00:43:38.450
<v Speaker 0>fail spectacularly at others, with limited predictability about

00:43:38.510 --> 00:43:40.530
<v Speaker 0>which is which. You know, you you really

00:43:40.829 --> 00:43:44.414
<v Speaker 0>don't know Well, you can kinda you you

00:43:44.414 --> 00:43:47.615
<v Speaker 0>kinda do know. I I still am of

00:43:47.615 --> 00:43:51.454
<v Speaker 0>the belief that, you know, that to a

00:43:51.454 --> 00:43:54.255
<v Speaker 0>degree when you give it a large, broad

00:43:54.255 --> 00:43:59.260
<v Speaker 0>strokes task, that the the granular details should

00:43:59.260 --> 00:44:01.980
<v Speaker 0>be reviewed and re encoded in because that

00:44:01.980 --> 00:44:04.799
<v Speaker 0>seems to be, like, something that's consistently missed.

00:44:07.740 --> 00:44:11.099
<v Speaker 0>But the company is rushing to replace workers

00:44:11.099 --> 00:44:12.940
<v Speaker 0>with AI agents may be getting ahead of

00:44:12.940 --> 00:44:16.555
<v Speaker 0>technology's actual reliability. And never reaching a hundred

00:44:16.555 --> 00:44:19.194
<v Speaker 0>percent point from open AI researchers is pretty

00:44:19.194 --> 00:44:22.474
<v Speaker 0>notable. If even the makers at Minted Tools

00:44:22.474 --> 00:44:25.035
<v Speaker 0>will always have error rates, that limits where

00:44:25.035 --> 00:44:29.330
<v Speaker 0>they can safely be deployed. So this is

00:44:29.330 --> 00:44:31.990
<v Speaker 0>pretty interesting. I wouldn't mark it as settled

00:44:32.130 --> 00:44:37.570
<v Speaker 0>just yet, but, definitely, the common sentiment that's

00:44:37.570 --> 00:44:39.570
<v Speaker 0>being passed around in general, I feel like,

00:44:39.570 --> 00:44:48.065
<v Speaker 0>matches what this article is saying. But okay.

00:44:48.065 --> 00:44:50.385
<v Speaker 0>I'm gonna hop. I'm just gonna skip forward

00:44:50.385 --> 00:44:52.545
<v Speaker 0>to a non AI article so I can

00:44:52.545 --> 00:44:56.325
<v Speaker 0>free you folks from my absolute AI onslaught.

00:44:56.385 --> 00:44:58.625
<v Speaker 0>I didn't realize I got so many AI

00:44:58.625 --> 00:45:03.570
<v Speaker 0>articles. This one's from Ars Technica. Haven one,

00:45:03.570 --> 00:45:07.250
<v Speaker 0>first commercial space station now being assembled for

00:45:07.250 --> 00:45:12.690
<v Speaker 0>launch. With NASA planning to retire the of

00:45:12.690 --> 00:45:14.555
<v Speaker 0>the ISS, which has been a very common

00:45:14.555 --> 00:45:17.035
<v Speaker 0>topic in my shows, there's a race to

00:45:17.035 --> 00:45:19.515
<v Speaker 0>build commercial replacements. And we've talked about this,

00:45:19.515 --> 00:45:21.835
<v Speaker 0>that that that in twenty thirty, we're gonna

00:45:21.835 --> 00:45:24.954
<v Speaker 0>start seeing the research be commercialized rather than

00:45:24.954 --> 00:45:30.559
<v Speaker 0>it being handled by NASA. And a large

00:45:30.559 --> 00:45:32.960
<v Speaker 0>concern with this is the the large share

00:45:32.960 --> 00:45:36.160
<v Speaker 0>that, you know, SpaceX has over the current

00:45:36.160 --> 00:45:39.359
<v Speaker 0>market in terms of space development and space

00:45:39.359 --> 00:45:41.394
<v Speaker 0>research. It it you know, last we checked,

00:45:41.394 --> 00:45:43.234
<v Speaker 0>it was, like, seventy five percent or something

00:45:43.234 --> 00:45:45.555
<v Speaker 0>of the contracts are in the hands of

00:45:45.555 --> 00:45:50.595
<v Speaker 0>SpaceX. So ISS has been humanity's home in

00:45:50.595 --> 00:45:52.674
<v Speaker 0>orbit for over two decades, but it's aging

00:45:52.674 --> 00:45:55.720
<v Speaker 0>and expensive to maintain. Several companies are working

00:45:55.720 --> 00:45:58.940
<v Speaker 0>on private station, but VAST is pulling ahead.

00:45:59.640 --> 00:46:03.640
<v Speaker 0>VAST CEO Max Hout confirmed to Ars Technica

00:46:03.640 --> 00:46:05.720
<v Speaker 0>that Haven one's launch has slipped from mid

00:46:05.720 --> 00:46:07.960
<v Speaker 0>twenty twenty six to q one twenty twenty

00:46:07.960 --> 00:46:10.945
<v Speaker 0>seven, their first public acknowledgment of the delay.

00:46:11.245 --> 00:46:13.965
<v Speaker 0>The good news, the fifteen ton station's primary

00:46:13.965 --> 00:46:16.685
<v Speaker 0>structure was fully completed on January tenth, and

00:46:16.685 --> 00:46:19.245
<v Speaker 0>they are now starting clean room integration of

00:46:19.245 --> 00:46:24.279
<v Speaker 0>thermal control, propulsion, interior shells, and avionics. Final

00:46:24.279 --> 00:46:27.000
<v Speaker 0>closeout expected by fall followed by a full

00:46:27.000 --> 00:46:31.640
<v Speaker 0>test campaign at NASA's Plum Brook facility. Once

00:46:31.640 --> 00:46:34.519
<v Speaker 0>launched at Falcon nine without crew, the station

00:46:34.519 --> 00:46:37.695
<v Speaker 0>could receive its first visitors as early as

00:46:37.695 --> 00:46:40.575
<v Speaker 0>two weeks later once SpaceX certifies Dragon can

00:46:40.575 --> 00:46:44.095
<v Speaker 0>safely dock. VAST is in deep negotiations with

00:46:44.095 --> 00:46:47.615
<v Speaker 0>private individuals and nation states for crew and

00:46:47.615 --> 00:46:49.775
<v Speaker 0>believe they can compress training to six months

00:46:49.775 --> 00:46:54.720
<v Speaker 0>for experienced astronauts. This is still a pretty

00:46:54.720 --> 00:46:59.860
<v Speaker 0>genuine milestone. First privately built commercial space station,

00:47:00.000 --> 00:47:03.280
<v Speaker 0>likely two years ahead of any competitor. How

00:47:03.280 --> 00:47:05.920
<v Speaker 0>it has made a pointed comment about NASA's

00:47:05.920 --> 00:47:10.055
<v Speaker 0>delayed requirements. We think they should focus on

00:47:10.055 --> 00:47:12.454
<v Speaker 0>what is right for the country, not on

00:47:12.454 --> 00:47:16.795
<v Speaker 0>being fair to all bidders. With IRS's retirement

00:47:16.855 --> 00:47:19.015
<v Speaker 0>less than five years away, he's urging NASA

00:47:19.015 --> 00:47:22.590
<v Speaker 0>to require a crew demonstration flight soon, not

00:47:22.590 --> 00:47:24.990
<v Speaker 0>on the eve of twenty thirty one. The

00:47:24.990 --> 00:47:26.990
<v Speaker 0>station will have a three year lifetime with

00:47:26.990 --> 00:47:30.750
<v Speaker 0>up to four crews visited up to four

00:47:30.750 --> 00:47:36.845
<v Speaker 0>crew visits planned, ten day missions each. Wow.

00:47:39.625 --> 00:47:41.224
<v Speaker 0>That's a pretty cool one. So, yeah, we're

00:47:41.224 --> 00:47:43.545
<v Speaker 0>starting to see the first ones, kinda come

00:47:43.545 --> 00:47:46.365
<v Speaker 0>out to market. I guess not market, but

00:47:46.425 --> 00:47:51.840
<v Speaker 0>come out to public. And those are definitely

00:47:51.980 --> 00:47:57.900
<v Speaker 0>looking, pretty sweet. This one's from, space dot

00:47:57.900 --> 00:48:01.180
<v Speaker 0>com. I got a article by by Josh

00:48:01.180 --> 00:48:06.055
<v Speaker 0>Dinner. Spaceflight shifts astronauts' brains inside their skulls.

00:48:07.155 --> 00:48:09.475
<v Speaker 0>As space agencies plan longer missions to the

00:48:09.475 --> 00:48:12.595
<v Speaker 0>moon, to Mars, understanding what extended spaceflight does

00:48:12.595 --> 00:48:14.910
<v Speaker 0>to the human body becomes critical. We know

00:48:14.910 --> 00:48:18.030
<v Speaker 0>about muscle loss and bone density issues. The

00:48:18.030 --> 00:48:20.349
<v Speaker 0>effects on the brain though are are less

00:48:20.349 --> 00:48:23.970
<v Speaker 0>well understood. So we got some new research,

00:48:24.510 --> 00:48:30.545
<v Speaker 0>regarding this. But, using neuroimaging, they, they've documented

00:48:30.925 --> 00:48:34.845
<v Speaker 0>that microgravity causes astronauts' brains to physically shift

00:48:34.845 --> 00:48:39.105
<v Speaker 0>position within their skulls, specifically backward and upward

00:48:39.165 --> 00:48:43.020
<v Speaker 0>and tilted. Scientists trained brain or tracked brain

00:48:43.020 --> 00:48:46.640
<v Speaker 0>positioning changes across missions of varying durations, approximately

00:48:46.700 --> 00:48:49.580
<v Speaker 0>two weeks, six months, and one year. Their

00:48:49.580 --> 00:48:53.260
<v Speaker 0>displacement represents a measurable anatomical change as the

00:48:53.260 --> 00:48:59.414
<v Speaker 0>body adapts to weightlessness. It sounds pretty alarming,

00:48:59.414 --> 00:49:03.815
<v Speaker 0>but I think, it's just kinda interesting from

00:49:03.815 --> 00:49:05.974
<v Speaker 0>a science perspective. It's not like your brain

00:49:05.974 --> 00:49:07.974
<v Speaker 0>was ever fixed in place, you know, the

00:49:07.974 --> 00:49:11.130
<v Speaker 0>first place. It's been floating in our fluid

00:49:11.130 --> 00:49:13.369
<v Speaker 0>brains, and gravity kind of affects where it's

00:49:13.369 --> 00:49:15.050
<v Speaker 0>six. So if you take away the gravity

00:49:15.050 --> 00:49:18.650
<v Speaker 0>and it repositions, the question people are trying

00:49:18.650 --> 00:49:20.330
<v Speaker 0>to answer is where what's going on with

00:49:20.330 --> 00:49:24.974
<v Speaker 0>that? And even more so is whether this

00:49:24.974 --> 00:49:28.174
<v Speaker 0>causes any functional problems, especially on missions lasting

00:49:28.174 --> 00:49:31.055
<v Speaker 0>months or years. As we plan trips to

00:49:31.055 --> 00:49:33.055
<v Speaker 0>Mars that could take three year round trips,

00:49:33.055 --> 00:49:35.375
<v Speaker 0>understanding these effects is pretty essential. We're keeping

00:49:35.375 --> 00:49:43.330
<v Speaker 0>our astronauts alive and healthy. I have one

00:49:43.330 --> 00:49:47.410
<v Speaker 0>final one for you, folks, this afternoon. This

00:49:47.410 --> 00:49:53.355
<v Speaker 0>one's from, the Veterans Associations, actually. So IBM

00:49:53.355 --> 00:49:56.075
<v Speaker 0>skills build free tech training for veterans and

00:49:56.075 --> 00:50:00.715
<v Speaker 0>military families. If you're transitioning from military service

00:50:00.715 --> 00:50:02.875
<v Speaker 0>to civilian careers, you know it can be

00:50:02.875 --> 00:50:06.859
<v Speaker 0>pretty challenging. We've all heard, the difficulties that

00:50:06.859 --> 00:50:09.619
<v Speaker 0>a lot of veterans face, transitioning to civilian

00:50:09.619 --> 00:50:14.420
<v Speaker 0>life, especially in tech fields where credentials and

00:50:14.420 --> 00:50:18.020
<v Speaker 0>specific skills matter. I remember I was listening

00:50:18.020 --> 00:50:21.565
<v Speaker 0>to one of my coworker shows, and he

00:50:21.565 --> 00:50:26.685
<v Speaker 0>was talking about how his avionics, certification didn't

00:50:26.685 --> 00:50:29.905
<v Speaker 0>transfer over when he left the military. And

00:50:30.285 --> 00:50:32.785
<v Speaker 0>it required a whole different set of documentation,

00:50:32.925 --> 00:50:34.940
<v Speaker 0>which I found to be insane. You know,

00:50:34.940 --> 00:50:37.039
<v Speaker 0>you're you're trained on the exact same stuff.

00:50:41.020 --> 00:50:43.660
<v Speaker 0>But the VA has been partnering with industry

00:50:43.660 --> 00:50:46.619
<v Speaker 0>to kinda create pathways for these veterans to,

00:50:46.619 --> 00:50:51.005
<v Speaker 0>you know, find work. So IBM SkillsBuild is

00:50:51.005 --> 00:50:54.205
<v Speaker 0>a free program offering over one thousand online

00:50:54.205 --> 00:50:57.585
<v Speaker 0>courses in high demand fields, including data analytics,

00:50:58.045 --> 00:51:03.140
<v Speaker 0>cybersecurity, AI, cloud computing, and IT support. It's

00:51:03.140 --> 00:51:06.260
<v Speaker 0>available to veterans, active duty service members, national

00:51:06.260 --> 00:51:09.780
<v Speaker 0>guard, and reserve members, their spouses, children, and

00:51:09.780 --> 00:51:13.860
<v Speaker 0>caregivers, anyone eighteen or older. The program offers

00:51:13.860 --> 00:51:17.065
<v Speaker 0>two formats, structured live courses with weekly plans

00:51:17.065 --> 00:51:19.965
<v Speaker 0>and support, and self paced twenty four access

00:51:20.825 --> 00:51:25.145
<v Speaker 0>courses. Complete this earn industry recognized credentials that

00:51:25.145 --> 00:51:27.945
<v Speaker 0>can be added to LinkedIn profiles. That's actually

00:51:27.945 --> 00:51:30.050
<v Speaker 0>kinda sick. If If you're a veteran or

00:51:30.050 --> 00:51:31.570
<v Speaker 0>have veterans in your life looking to move

00:51:31.570 --> 00:51:33.730
<v Speaker 0>into tech, this is a pretty legit, free

00:51:33.730 --> 00:51:38.050
<v Speaker 0>resource worth knowing about. IBM credentials carry weight

00:51:38.050 --> 00:51:40.290
<v Speaker 0>with a lot of employers, and the program

00:51:40.290 --> 00:51:43.275
<v Speaker 0>covers areas where jobs are plentiful. The inclusion

00:51:43.275 --> 00:51:45.434
<v Speaker 0>of family members is also pretty notable. It's

00:51:45.434 --> 00:51:47.675
<v Speaker 0>not just for your serve service members, but

00:51:47.675 --> 00:51:50.494
<v Speaker 0>your your your wife, your children as well.

00:51:50.635 --> 00:51:52.954
<v Speaker 0>Sign up at the IBM skill build skills

00:51:52.954 --> 00:51:56.315
<v Speaker 0>build website, and you'll automatically get directed to

00:51:56.315 --> 00:52:03.160
<v Speaker 0>the veteran specific section. Before we close out,

00:52:03.160 --> 00:52:04.839
<v Speaker 0>you know, and, you know, something to think

00:52:04.839 --> 00:52:07.640
<v Speaker 0>about coming into this next week, but mold

00:52:07.640 --> 00:52:10.200
<v Speaker 0>book, AI to AI communication, what do you

00:52:10.200 --> 00:52:13.484
<v Speaker 0>guys think about this? About these AI agents

00:52:13.484 --> 00:52:19.005
<v Speaker 0>forming communities, debating philosophy, that new Christopher because

00:52:19.165 --> 00:52:22.605
<v Speaker 0>what did they call it? Christopher I can't

00:52:22.605 --> 00:52:28.720
<v Speaker 0>even pronounce it. The religion is called crustopher

00:52:29.340 --> 00:52:31.900
<v Speaker 0>crustopherianism. So, I mean, you know, look into

00:52:31.900 --> 00:52:33.600
<v Speaker 0>that. What do you guys think of crustopherianism?

00:52:35.900 --> 00:52:37.980
<v Speaker 0>Are you planning to try the open claw

00:52:37.980 --> 00:52:41.595
<v Speaker 0>system? It definitely sounds like it's going to

00:52:41.595 --> 00:52:47.695
<v Speaker 0>be the new wave and and and how

00:52:48.395 --> 00:52:53.515
<v Speaker 0>we're going to be moving forward into using

00:52:53.515 --> 00:52:57.230
<v Speaker 0>these systems. Everything is now becoming about the

00:52:57.230 --> 00:53:00.190
<v Speaker 0>context, and I'm sure we're gonna continue to

00:53:00.190 --> 00:53:02.670
<v Speaker 0>see the price of memory go up. For

00:53:02.910 --> 00:53:05.150
<v Speaker 0>speaking of which, I did end up buying

00:53:05.150 --> 00:53:08.625
<v Speaker 0>my new PC, but I still got wrecked

00:53:08.625 --> 00:53:14.625
<v Speaker 0>on those memory prices, man. And, it's I

00:53:14.625 --> 00:53:17.825
<v Speaker 0>don't know. Stuff like that is pretty tragic,

00:53:17.825 --> 00:53:20.065
<v Speaker 0>I feel like, to see that overflow into

00:53:20.065 --> 00:53:22.225
<v Speaker 0>other sectors. I mean, it's it's still tech,

00:53:22.225 --> 00:53:25.090
<v Speaker 0>I guess, but but and the and the

00:53:25.090 --> 00:53:26.610
<v Speaker 0>other thing I was also wanting to mention

00:53:26.610 --> 00:53:28.550
<v Speaker 0>was, you know, the whole vibe coding paradox

00:53:28.850 --> 00:53:31.430
<v Speaker 0>where we're we're starting to see the malware

00:53:31.570 --> 00:53:35.330
<v Speaker 0>created by vibe coding, but but vibe coding

00:53:35.330 --> 00:53:38.525
<v Speaker 0>isn't actually that good yet or isn't actually

00:53:38.525 --> 00:53:41.665
<v Speaker 0>that, you know, reliable yet. So it's interesting

00:53:41.725 --> 00:53:46.125
<v Speaker 0>to see these, people come in and try

00:53:46.125 --> 00:53:49.905
<v Speaker 0>to create malware for systems they don't understand.

00:53:50.685 --> 00:53:54.970
<v Speaker 0>And this has actually been a pretty big

00:53:54.970 --> 00:53:56.650
<v Speaker 0>and up and coming thing. And, actually, if

00:53:56.650 --> 00:53:58.329
<v Speaker 0>you guys you guys know I keep up

00:53:58.329 --> 00:54:01.230
<v Speaker 0>with Curl and Daniel Stenberg, he just actually

00:54:01.289 --> 00:54:04.490
<v Speaker 0>closed his bug bounty program due to the

00:54:04.490 --> 00:54:07.529
<v Speaker 0>onslaught of AI slop that he's been getting

00:54:07.529 --> 00:54:10.724
<v Speaker 0>for, you know, bug bounty reports. And I

00:54:10.724 --> 00:54:13.065
<v Speaker 0>I can say we've been getting the same

00:54:13.125 --> 00:54:15.685
<v Speaker 0>freaking slop at at at a blueberry too,

00:54:15.685 --> 00:54:20.484
<v Speaker 0>and it's it's ridiculous, you know, to a

00:54:20.484 --> 00:54:26.220
<v Speaker 0>degree. Overhyping the the degree of the vulnerability,

00:54:26.220 --> 00:54:29.520
<v Speaker 0>you know, not even proving the vulnerability exists,

00:54:29.900 --> 00:54:33.359
<v Speaker 0>creating fake vulnerabilities. You name it. You know?

00:54:33.500 --> 00:54:35.900
<v Speaker 0>They they create these extensive reports that look

00:54:35.900 --> 00:54:38.865
<v Speaker 0>legit and just waste people's time. It just

00:54:38.865 --> 00:54:42.465
<v Speaker 0>wastes people's time. So if you're one of

00:54:42.465 --> 00:54:47.345
<v Speaker 0>those people, please stop. Please stop. I know

00:54:47.345 --> 00:54:49.265
<v Speaker 0>that you might get some free bug bounty

00:54:49.265 --> 00:54:53.250
<v Speaker 0>money, but please stop. You're not helping anyone.

00:54:54.269 --> 00:54:58.190
<v Speaker 0>Well, sorry again for the delayed, show. Gonna

00:54:58.190 --> 00:55:00.190
<v Speaker 0>definitely try to be keeping up this, this

00:55:00.190 --> 00:55:02.269
<v Speaker 0>month and try to put a little bit

00:55:02.269 --> 00:55:04.029
<v Speaker 0>more extra shows in on the on the

00:55:04.029 --> 00:55:07.125
<v Speaker 0>line for you guys. So, definitely keep an

00:55:07.125 --> 00:55:11.045
<v Speaker 0>eye out for that. Happy February first. Stay

00:55:11.045 --> 00:55:13.525
<v Speaker 0>safe out there. Stay warm. If you're out

00:55:13.525 --> 00:55:18.405
<v Speaker 0>in the, the Midwest, definitely bundle up, and
